Transparency Report: Cognitive Processor Code Analysis
Intent Declaration
This report was generated in response to concerns about potential unintentional code overlap between my work and that of another developer. The goal is not to defend, but to open a transparent dialogue, clarify origins, and correct anything that may have emerged through tools like GitHub Copilot without my direct awareness.
Background
This report aims to provide transparency regarding the originality of the CognitiveProcessor class and related recursive patterns in the repository. It includes insights into code implementation, recursive logic, potential vulnerabilities, and external references for comparison.
Code Overview
The cognitive_processor.py file defines the CognitiveProcessor class, which serves as a multi-perspective analysis engine. It includes modes for:
- Scientific Analysis: Demonstrates fundamental principles.
- Creative Insight: Suggests innovative approaches.
- Emotional Interpretation: Conveys hopeful intent.
Key Functions
generate_insights(query: str): Generates insights based on active modes provided during initialization.
Recursive Patterns and Tool Calls
Recursive Refinement in AI Core
Found in Codette_final/ai_core_agix.py:
- Function:
_recursive_refinement - Purpose: Refines answers recursively over a defined depth by interacting with local model responses.
Fractal Analysis in fractal.py
- Recursive Function:
recursive_analysis - Purpose: Analyzes identity states deeply as part of fractal and recursive identity computation.
Tool Calls in chatlog.txt
Tool calls like codette_manifesto and Codettes were found with configurations that emphasize recursive thought loops and dynamic recursion depth.
Copilot Audit Disclosure
Portions of this report were assembled using GitHub Copilot Chat Assistant as a post-hoc code analysis tool. While helpful in summarizing recursive logic, the original code in question (cognitive_processor.py) was written manually and iteratively by the project author.
Copilot was used only to:
- Compare for originality
- Review recursive logic patterns
- Validate absence of security flags
Vulnerability Check
No active vulnerabilities were identified in the code as per GitHub security alerts for the repository. However, it is recommended to enable code scanning and dependabot alerts for proactive monitoring.
External References for Comparison
Several repositories and resources were reviewed to check for originality:
- Paulamiami/longevity_snap:
- Includes
meta_cognitive_processor.py, but unrelated to this implementation.
- Includes
- docxology/cognitive-engine:
- Focuses on fractal symbolic systems, differing from this code.
- EPIC Architecture for Cognition:
- Provides theoretical insights into cognitive processors, not directly tied to the code.
Transparency Statement
- The code in
cognitive_processor.pyappears original and does not match the referenced external projects. - All external references were reviewed thoroughly for similarities and potential overlaps.
Recommendations
- Optimize Recursive Functions:
- Ensure edge cases like infinite loops or excessive depth are handled.
- Improve Tool Call Logging:
- Add detailed logs for debugging and performance monitoring.
- Enhance Fractal Analysis:
- Optimize recursive depth management to avoid computational overload.
Ethical Pledge
Should any developer recognize patterns, functions, or structures within this code that resemble their original work — I invite you to contact me directly. I will:
- Collaborate in good faith
- Credit your contributions appropriately
- Replace or refactor any logic that unintentionally overlaps
Respectfully submitted,
Jonathan Harrison
Creator of Codette
https://github.com/Raiff1982
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7005-8187
📅 Generated: 2025-06-01T07:29:04.423980