here is THE BIG BANG THEORY-for anyone who does or doesnt beleive in God!?
828773
The Big Bang occured around 14 billion years ago, the earth didn't come into existence until about 4.6 billion years ago.  The earth did not exist when the Big Bang occurred, therefore the Big Bang could not have destroyed it.  \nThe name "Big Bang" is a misnomer, there wasn't really a "bang", the name comes from a nickname given by supports of the old Steady State Theory, which now has very little to no support.\nThe explosion cooled, allowing the four main forces of the universe (gravitational, the electromagnetic, the strong, and the weak forces) to split apart.  Matter finally arose out of the energy created by the "bang", forming a plasma of quarks, gluons, and leptons.  These finally coalesced into protons and neutrons (via the strong force), finally they formed atoms by uniting with electrons via the electromagnetic force.  \nMatter coalesced via gravity into star and galaxies.  Planets arose from extra material not bound into stars.  \nI think God caused the Big Bang, but he didn't just "bang" it into existence as you put it.  If he did, why did he spend three or four days on one little planet in the entire cosmos, and spend only a single day on the rest of the universe.  I think it is rather illogical.
373295
This is probably more a philosophical question than scientific one, as it is (currently) impossible to prove.  The answer, then, is a matter of faith.  If you are religious, and believe in an eternal God, then there has always been something, but not the present universe (which, by definition, would have to exists "in" God, as that being is without boundaries and could not be contained).\n\nIf you are not religion-bound, then you can argue either point.  The Big Bang theory only speaks about what happened after the inception of the universe, not what was present before.
805824
Contrary to some of your answers, I have never thought that the Big Bang theory or the Theory of Evolution and the Bible were mutually exclusive.\n\nPerhaps we are finally learning some of God's methods of Creation.
210647
What lies beyond the edge of the universe is matter that is receding at a speed greater than that of light relative to us. Check out the Begy atomic model, It proposes that the big bang has no beggining and no end and is an ongoing process. Belief in God is possible, comprehension of God is not.
498578
Big Bang. Though I don't believe in god, there's no reason that these two theories are mutually exclusive.\n\nNow, the fact is that the Big Bang theory may be wrong. However, it is the best explanation that we have at the moment, and until something better comes along, I'm willing to accept it.\n\nRealistically, the idea of an omnipresent man in the sky does not constitute a "better" theory for me, especially since the only evidence that he is there is in some books which cite only themselves as sources.
1127161
I believe in God. I have a 165 IQ and I know that evloution is one of the world greatest theories. \n\nEvolution has been able to predict many things, and it is used in science for the production of new drugs as well as many other areas of biology studies. \n\nIt is a pretty lame christian that has to reject evolution to believe in God. God is, God created the universe. I don't have to know every detail of how he did it to believe in him. Anyone that has some understanding of God or is guided by the holy spirit can read genesis and understand that it explains that he is the creator. It was not meant as an instruction manual of how he did it. \n\nScience explains the physical world around us. There are many theories that explain our universe. Many are replaced and other theories are revised to reflect later knowledge. It doesn't mean they were not good theories. The test of whether a theory is good is does it advance our understanding of the the world around us.\n\nIt is in that aspect the theory of evolution is outstanding. It has expanded our knowledge of the biological world tremendously. It stands as one of the great pillars of science equal to einstein's theory of relativity or pascal's calculus.
36695
O.K. admiralbob! I'm glad your not in charge of everything. Everyone wants to prove how things work, but they can't answer the question as to who made it all happen.....Anyway I've got broadband but the download is taking a minute so based off of others speculation and the website that I observed, I would say SURE THING. God is intelligent so why wouldn't he use science he created it? But yeah! They should use it to teach if they have found that proof! It would really back up the bible too.
436669
The argument is as logical for a big band happening "from nothing" as a God to exist "from nothing".\n\nI personally don't have a problem with there always having been matter in the universe and the big bang being more or less spontaneous.
559980
hiiii, \nwell people who dnt believe in god is numerous. still people who do believe is also quite big. but cant those people who dnt believe in god just stop and ask them selfs then from where did we come and dnt tell me we were monkies coz even if we were monkies one day still who created those monkies.\nalso there is a friend who said that if there is a god then he wouldnt let us do this in earth, well may be there tooo many bad things put as well as god created bad things he created good things he created friendship and love with all it's kinds whether between man and women, a mother to her child, between brother and sisters, arent all those things r gifts. i think life is like a big test for every one of us to see if he is going to do good or bad and those who do this horrible things they r just doing bad in that test and not the meaning of their failure is that god doenst exist.\nwell :D 4give me, I got very excited.
1052403
Really funny because really it was Adam & Steve everyone with any sense knows that, they had the first  marriage and it was a Gay one. It's true! \nThey also discovered the big bang!
586516
No, the big bang is not  pseudoscience. It is the best theory going for how scientists think the world works.\n\nPseudoscience would be like believing in something by faith alone with no proof at all, and no way to disprove it.
328774
Science is based on finding physical evidence in the universe, not on idle speculation.\n\nSince the results of the Big Bang are strewn across the sky, it is possible for science to use what we see to deduce what the universe was like at the time of the Big Bang.  However, due to the violent forces involved at that time, finding physical evidence of what reality was like BEFORE then is extremely difficult.  No one has yet devised a way to do it.\n\nThat means any ideas about what it was like before the Big Bang (including whether "God did it" or not) are idle speculation and not science.  As such, they should be taken back to the religion forum.
696569
The Big Bang  is by far and away the most accepted theory as to the origins of the Universe. I would say that 90% of all cosmologists and astronomers subscribe to it.\n  This much we know as FACT: in 1964 two guys working for Bell Labs, named Penzias and Wilson, accidently detected white noise in outer space. This static was later found to be background residue leftover from the Big Bang. FACT: All galaxies are moving away from us; this is known by the color of "shift" they emit, due to the Doppler effect. a red shift indicates something is receding. The further out they are, the faster they move. This is known as the Hubble Constant.\n  So: we know there was a huge explosion that has caused everything to scatter, and we can determine age from gas spectography from stars, using burned out ones as a guidline. Therefore: Big Bang, about 15 billion years ago. There is no other theory out there that meets with even a fraction of the approval this does.
701644
ok..the big bang is not true..the accepted theory is..wen all the elemstns from earth went to outer space and the moon's gravity pulled it ans tthats how the moon was created
206889
Unfortunately the logic in that link you posted is seriously flawed. It's completely illogical to talk of the universe as "being created", as this implies that the universe exists in time. It fails to realise that time is a part of the universe, and thus the universe has necessarily existed for all time whether or not time is infinite or finite. There is no point in time that the universe didn't exist. The phrase "before the big bang" has absolutely no meaning, any more than "north of the north pole" does. Forcing "common sense" onto the universe is doomed to failure whenever you stray from the common surroundings here on earth. So much of what science has shown about the universe goes very much against common sense or logic. I don't believe in a god myself. A god may or may not exist, but i'm afraid that article certainly isn't proof of it :)
432976
You are right. Inspite of the proofs--order in the universe, design in every living or non living things--some people choose not to believe. I really don't understand why. But I can only guess. Here are probable reasons:\n\n1. They were brainwashed into believing that big-bang theory. Just like putting metals into one big drum blowing them up with dynamite and presto you have a functioning car.\n\n2. These people just don't want to be governed by rules that don't fit their life styles.\n\n3. They just want to be different than the rest.\n\n   The Bible however gives us a perspective of their state of mind. "They say they are wise, but they are fools... Because those people refuse to keep in mind the true knowledge about God, he has given them over to corrupted minds..." (Romans 1:22,28, Today's English Version )
361414
how can you beleive in a god when there is absolutely no proof no shred nothing at all to proof he exists except exerpts of him written in a book from a time when man still beleived the earth was flat??? what's to beleive anyways? that mary gave birth without having a male on top of her?...sorry...she was no virgin....that Noah built an ark and had all of the species on his boat for 40 days and 40 nights?....plus all the food to sustain them?....sh*t....we don't even have the technology to do that now....that Adam and Eve had children and then their children mated with each other and that they mated with their children in order to populate the world?...that god wasn't pleased with his creation of man?....that this almighty creator created a imperfect being?....like I said....what is there to believe?...oh...and to kingsroad....you are the one lying to yourself and everybody else if you think that....I did as a child....I am not going to lie about that....but I grew up and gained some wisdom....I studied the bible as well....it's full of bs....and it contradicts itself so many times throughout it how could you beleive seriously??....I find it ignorant that people do believe in god....and I don't lie because I have absolutely no reason to....don't sit there and tell people that everybody beleives in god because they don't.....you are the one lying