how do you put the word alleged in a sentence?
827755
EXAMPLE:\n\n  " The husband alleged, that his wife put poison in his food"\n\n(meaning it could be false, usually one person's word)\n\n"The police alleged, that the defendant had a gun in his hand."
881821
It is not a proper word, however it has evolved into a word used commonly.  The word you probably want to use is "arguably" which is the adjectival form of the word "arguable." "arguable" means something that is open to argument.  For instance "'Argumentably' is arguably a word."
456323
LAY AND LIE IS TOP ON THE LIST EVEN NATIVE SPEAKERS FAIL AT USING THEM...\n\nLAY, LAID, LAID\nLIE, LAY, LAIN\n\nYesterday, she lay down for an hour.  But native speakers sometimes say 'she laid down'... WRONG!  But they say it.\n\nShe has lain down everyday for the two past weeks.  And again, a native speaker might say 'she has laid down' WRONG!  But some say it.\n\nIf you say: 'Yesterday I laid down' That's wrong!  Yesterday I lay down. (<---- CORRECT...)\n\nTRANSITIVE & INTRANSITIVE THAT'S THE QUESTION!
879009
Neither of these statments is even close to being true.  If someone spoke the line you said and another changed it, the term for what the second person did would be "misquoting".  The term for what the first did would most likely be "libel".
1046936
I would do it like this:\n\nperson 1: blabbity\nperson 2: blah\n\nJust do two lines with person 1 at the top and person 2 on the bottom.  Do it one sentence at a time.  It might be tedious, but that's the best way I can think of to give your friend full access to what is going on.
60044
An assertion is simply a declarative sentence. It need not be true. Example: (I am asserting that) I am the King of England.
148966
It depends on context.\nGeneral or prevalent usage does not necesarily legitimise bad English. \n\nIncidentally your answer to another question where you have suggested that 'like' is a substitute for different forms of the verb 'say' is totally erroneous. The 'sentence' the questioner has asked about is so magnificently ill-structured that it takes time to comprehend and with no context in which to place it (no textual commentary and it is not part of a larger scripted dialogue or transcript of a conversation) we must take it at its 'effective' face-value.\n\n"Like" is here the equivalent of the equally vague "sort of" or "kind of" and is meaningful only in the generally and necessarily vague (or arguably 'free') state of the informal language coding of the rest of the 'sentence'.\n\nBut this then brings us to clasification and despite all arguments to the contrary we are stuck with the 'like' in question (no pun intended) falling into the category of the adjectival.\n\nI suppose, at the end of the day, it may depend on quite what one means by semantics...  but that day has not yet begun and the end is faraway...\n\nThanks for inspiring me to spout.\n\n:)
734271
I see one run on sentence that needs to be split. I also see two others that should be combined into one\n\nThat said, a good writer never pads the piece. The whole idea is to make it as clear & concise as possible. As a writer, the only legitimate way to extend this is to add information.\n\nI just did a search & on the first page I opened & found the answer to your problems - with an "s".. Your info or the web page info is incorrect, one or the other  There was enough other info to expand the reason for the tie.\n\nAfter a quick search, I found additional info & an error you may wish to correct.       This is a much better version than the 3 sentences I wrote earlier, correct? That is what I mean by clear & concise.\n \nYou've done all right so far. just a little more..
3922
The verb of a sentence states what the subject does. \n   For example: "The dog ran down the street." The dog is the subject and the verb "ran" is stating what the subject does.
266425
You have to look at the entire pleading in context.  Unless the pleading is verified under penalty of perjury, none of the allegations can be grounds for perjury.  Furthermore, you need to look at the specific nature of the allegations and the qualifiers.  If the declaration alleges something based on "information and belief" as opposed to personal knowledge, that doesn't support a charge of perjury if determined to be false.  Finally, the phrase "believes and avers" might have a specific meaning under the laws of your state that might be unique.
1097400
a).\n\nBut it's "case AND controversy."
897074
you could either use a comma as you have or change the sentence to.... i am in good physical condition and exercise every day.
526898
Innocent till prove in Guilty
661172
paraphrase is a re-wording\n\ncommentary adds extra materials and expounds
747290
An implied topic sentence is one where the topic is obvious by the constant reference to the topic. \ne.g.\nAlthough the building was amazing in its architecture &  astounding in size, its main feature was its beauty to the eye of the beholder.\n\nImplied topic: This is a building which is exceedingly beautiful.
912999
Because the sentence structure police will get you. But really as long as it is in informal conversation it is ok. In business documents or something for school it better be correct.
411239
you can't, because these are apocryphal terms, which means questionable authorship or authenticity; or Erroneous; fictitious. this is a trick question, with no answer