Does god want men to have no foreskin?
826781
Penis cutting 1:01 All men should be circumsized because it looks so gross when its not cut. \n\nhehe
958451
Yes. A circumcised man is a beautiful sight to see. An uncircumcised one is just disgusting.
978518
he went around and saw suffering and said that in order to end suffering we must get rid of our desires.    \n\nno powers, no pregancy, its just a statue
992753
Not other than it's easier to keep it clean and then the father doesn't have to have the "how to clean your self" talk, with their son.\n\nIt looks nice, a lot of girls/women don't like foreskin. \nIt's painful, but it's not like he'll remember it. \n\nA Mohel, is a person that performs the circumision, in the jewish faith. On t.v. this lady hired one, even though she wasn't jewish and she said the baby hardly cried at all. It was that reality show  Dr. 90210.
1164478
Nope. Actually, when you're not circumcised you require no lubricant as the foreskin acts as a sheath and the skin is pulled down upon penetration (leaving you looking, well, circumcised and more ably stimulated).
731023
Absolutely not.  A man should be able to do what he wants with his own body.  More often it is the man who wants the vasectomy, not the woman.  A vasectomy is not castration so I don't see why anyone would consider it a loss of manhood or refer to the man as "whipped".    \n\nThe Bible says slavery is ok (Exodus 21:7, Lev. 25:44) and it also says anyone who works on the Sabbath should be put to death (Exodus 35:2).  I would like to see you fight for these as well. The Bible makes no mention of a vasectomy being prohibited.  Interpretations are a different story.\n\nThe US government will not bend for Christians every time a different interpretation of biblical scripture crops up.  The doctrine of separation of church and state prohibits this.
348047
God doesn't want you to worship Him, but to know Him. Blind faith and worship won't bring you closer to God, following His guidance, especially what his Son Christ had to tell us, will.\n\nThat is, follow the golden rule, not what other so called Christians will have you believe is true. Treat others as you would be treated, love everyone, turn the other cheek, accept diversity.\n\nChristianity today is so mixes up with politics, the original message is often lost.\n\nChrist would not have been against gay marriage (only old testament crap mentions this), he would not have discrimitated in any way. He would have abhored war, gluttony, greed, love of money, gas guzzling vehicles, etc.\n\nIn response to emils122: Christ gave us a new covenant. He totally disregarded the Sabbath commandment, showing how the old law was replaced with the new (Luke 4:16-30, Luke 4:31-39, Matthew 12:1-8; Mark 2:23-28; Luke 6:1-5, etc).\n\nAs Christians, we follow the example of Christ, not the Hebrew Scriptures. They make for good stories, but it is very dangerous to take them literally.\n\nHave your ever eaten pork or shrimp, shaved your face, or worn multiple fabrics (cotton, linen, silk) at the same time? Well if you have, you are as sinful, according to the Book of Leviticus, as any man who lies "with a male as with a woman." That's right. Eating pork (Leviticus 11:7), or fish that "has not fins and scales" (Leviticus 11:10) is also an abomination. The section also proscribes shaving beard growth (Leviticus 19:27) and prohibits wearing a "garment of cloth made of two kinds" of fabric (Leviticus 19:19). While Orthodox Jews today follow many of these ancient edicts, the entire section is about primitive rituals concerning conduct and cleanliness to insure growth of Israel's population and is not taken literally by most Americans today. Earlier in the Old Testament, we have the story of Lot (Genesis 19). Some Biblical scholars interpret this passage as a complicated commentary on "hospitality," as the two angels visiting Lot were about to be "known" by certain men of Sodom. But read on. The more telling turn of this story is when Lot offered his two daughters to be raped instead. How many Christians today think letting their daughter be raped is proper way to show hospitality?\n\nEnough said, I think.
925099
It is a twist on scripture. My wife grew up in the same kind of church, a preachers daughter. If these bunch of legalisms would read the bible they would find out that that scripture ends with, "But we have no such customs in our churches." The original intent of this was concerning the Jewish law where women were supposed to cover their heads as a sign of subservience to God and their husbands. It's pure legalism. I have argued on the hair being a coverings also and how ridiculous this is. If hair is considered a covering, then men can go to church without pants on since we have hair covering our legs. It is legalism plain and simple.
1121380
I think you mean circumcised.\n\nNo, the Quran does not require it, but Muhammad spoke favorably of it.
1041609
Yes, you can have a circumcision that doesn't remove all of the foreskin.  It is not very common; but the tissue removed may be more or less depending on how the circumcision is done.
12030
It is also not god's will for you to eat shrimp, wear clothes made of 2 kinds of thread or for men to shave their beards.  In the same chapter where it describes "man laying with men as with women" it also outlines how a daughter may be sold into slavery.\n\nIf you are going to hold these beliefs please be consistent and don't pawn off your bigotry as the "will of god"
115010
having sex is natures gift given to u so why to reject it\nif u have abstained then instead mastu**ate as it will fulfill your sexual desire.the foreskin has not shrunk due to the reason given by u.if u want to get rid of this problem u will have have to undertake a small painless surgery known as circumcision where your foreskin will be removed.
656933
Although most circumcised men would never openly admit to it, they are jealous of men who have foreskins. \n\nThey know that their foreskins were removed without their consent when they were (usually) babies and so they try and make EVERYONE suffer the same abuse as they encountered.\n\nBe proud to be normal and intact - the way that nature intended. \n\nThese days there are NO hygenic reasons for circumcision if you bathe at least once a day. There will therefore be no smell. Accusations otherwise are just born out of ignorance. If you consider most of European men, for instance, are uncircumcised, don't you think they would have moved to circumcision en masse long ago if circumcision was the most hygenic and correct thing to do?\n\nAlmost all other reasons for circumcision are now medically treatable and therefore, circumcision is unneccessary.\n\nFor women, an intact penis is DESIGNED to work better that a circumcised one because the foreskin allows for greater movement during sexual intercourse and less lubrication is required.\n\nIt is also better for the man because his glans is soft and sensitive - the glans on circumcised penises gets thick and hard over the years and decreases sensitivity and can even lead to erection problems.\n\nI am writing this as someone who IS circumcised and I am appalled that a fully functional part of me was trimmed off for no real reason and which has, subsequently, given me a less satisfactory sex life than my uncut counterparts.
182643
1 Corinthians 6:18 Flee from fornication. Every other sin that a man may commit is outside his body, but he that practices fornication is sinning against his own body.\nHebrews 13:4 Let marriage be honorable among all, and the marriage bed be without defilement, for God will judge fornicators and adulterers.\n1Thessalonians 4:3 For this is what God wills, the sanctifying of YOU, that YOU abstain from fornication.\n(1 Corinthians 6:15) Do YOU not know that YOUR bodies are members of Christ? Shall I, then, take the members of the Christ away and make them members of a harlot? Never may that happen!\n(Ephesians 5:3) Let fornication and uncleanness of every sort or greediness not even be mentioned among YOU, just as it befits holy people.\nThese are but some. Hope this helps. :)
567180
I am sorry, I looked Exodus Chapter 4 verse 26 up in my bible and it didn't mention God wanting to kill Moses. It talks about Zipporah calling her husband (Moses) a bloody husband because she circumcised their (her's and Moses') son. But in Ex. 4:24-25 God wanted to kill him b/c his son was not circumcised
1078217
Circumcision is an outdated torture that should be abolished. It does nothing to help the function of the penis and actually loses some of the nerves in the penis. I am intact and love it and I have had no complaints From anybody I have been with. The main thing is to teach the young boys how to keep their penis clean and they will have no hygiene problems and better sex because of the extra nerve tissue
809904
There is no sin in such a thing. That sounds like legalism to me. As well as quite foolish. The bible never specified this to be wrong.\nPaul only mentioned a womans hair is her glory. Not so as to not cut it.