Why are Liberals hypocrites?
812976
Why can't you see that all politicians are hypocrites?
624344
It's the American way, and they saw it on TV. Most of their reasons are unfounded, untrue, childish, and showing ignorance. They call themselves liberals.
346707
"They" are called "liberals because their scope of concern expands to include everyone (Jesus was one of the first Liberals). Most liberals even have compassion for jerrks like you too!
1048786
Because if Liberals told us who they really are and what they really believe, they lose every time... ooops, I guess that's happening anyway...\n\nEven though Liberals agree with Communists and Socialists, they know that those labels don't play well with the American People.
928828
I did not think they were a liberal group.\n Are you making stuff up to try to prove that people dont look anything up for themselves and will just argue with someone?
41984
Of course I would - I wouldn't be a hypocrite like the liberal Democrats in this country who claim that they are for diversity in America. They are only for diversity if the person agrees with the way they think - anyone else has sold out their race. \n\nAnother example of liberal Democrat's "tolerance" for black candidates in America is shown in this excerpt from an article about Lt. Gov. Michael S. Steele in his bid for the U.S. Senate : "During the 2002 campaign, Democratic supporters pelted Mr. Steele with Oreo cookies during a gubernatorial debate at Morgan State University in Baltimore."\n\nThat's one of many reasons why liberals are hypocrites....
734905
From earlier questions I see a liberal double standard!!!!
997731
I too can tell a liberal just by the way they act...they have a hate basis for anything they don't agree with while paying lip service to "tolerance".  The way they act is so child-like.  What they don't understand is that they are attempting to take away all the rules in our country...commit crime....let them out,  marry same sex...there is nothing perverted about that....be a pedophile,,,,it's ok, you were born that way.....and down with religion, esp Christian because it is evil to have a higher power say that anything is wrong.   It is a child-like existance in a world of theory...global warming, abortion, gun control etc. etc. I wish we could cut the country in half and live in the conservative half!!!
507480
Sorry proff, but is all about enriching ones self, you seen the one above me. Liberals are the scum of the earth because they care about people, it is wrong to care about anybody but yourself. I personally have seen both sides and I can't be so callus, maybe that is why I am a democrat. I think if you have a pile of boxes and you want to move them it is better to lift from the bottom that way you move all three boxes but if you lift from the top as the repuglicans do then all you lift is the top.
1087102
Its not ... Conservatives think everything is left-wing biased and Liberals think everything is right-wing biased ... the simple fact is that humans are incapable of presenting facts in a completely objective way ... thank god some of us have the intellectual ability to develop our own opinions.
37281
I assume you are a liberal and the "country of hypocrites" you refer to are conservative.\n\nNo, we thought Bill Clinton should have been removed from office because he lied under oath. He got caught. And he ADMITTED he lied under oath. As the chief law enforcement officer in the land, someone who breaks the law by lying under oath is not fit to occupy the office. In other words, Mr. Clinton admitted he committed PERJURY which is a FELONY. You and I would be in jail for committing it. Why is Mr. Clinton above the law?\n\nMr. Clinton showed an absolute lack of respect for the military of this country. Military members were not allowed to even wear their uniforms at the White House. He showed a determination to engage in some minor military action so he could answer critics who claimed he was a dove. He drove the military to the sad state of world policeman. He depleted the military both personnel and materiel wise until it was a hollow military that had soldier running around yelling "BANG" on training exercises. (And I know what I speak of - I was in every one of the scenarios listed above.)\n\nAnd last but not least, he is still chain to the demon named Hillary. SHE is the Anti-Christ and will spell doom for the world as we know it.\n\nAGAIN - browneyedmaiden is talking out of her a**. "Look how many of our special men and women that we have lost due to Bush's vendetta." Let me assure you, Ms. Maiden, that the vast majority of men and women in Iraq are there by there own choice. How do I know? I have been there. Twice. We take pride in our jobs because it is a tough job and not many people are up to it. Those who don't have the courage to do it generally sit back and complain about the special men and women we have lost due to Bush's vendetta. We love it because we are helping people put their lives together - lives that have been dismantled and detroyed over the course of the last 30 years. Many, many soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines volunteer to go back to Iraq to serve another tour. \n\nBut I don't expect you to believe that because the media doesn't report on those things. Check them out yourself.
87329
Because we are narrow-minded hypocrites.
968792
Well, Bush has repeatedly said that everyone who disagree with him is a terrorist who hates America.\n\nI just clicked the Politics link above, and found this\n\n  Why Are Liberals So Stupid and Hypocritical?\n\nThis is relatively mild, compared to a lot of the attacks I've seen on this site.
316133
Liberals are idiots. They are self-indulgent, self loathing traitors who would rather destroy this country than loosen their necrotic death grasp on the last vestiges of their vanishing power.
470225
Liberals are monkeys.
496056
I think the reason is that liberals believe that man is capable of being perfect without anybody's help. They think that all it takes is education. This is the reason behind much of their supposedly self-righteous anger at anybody who seems to diagree with them:\n\n"I've just explained my position to this person, and he disagrees! Since I can't possibly be mistaken, he might simply be too stupid to understand. I'll be patient and give him a second chance."\n\n(After explaining a second time,)\n\n"I've just explained my position to this person who was pretending to be honestly curious and he STILL disagrees! Since I can't possibly be mistaken, and he doesn't seem to stupid to understanmd, he must be DELIBERATELY pretending to be dumb in order to waste my time! That makes him a CAD as well as a HERETIC! What's more, he knows EXACTLY how much what he says and does irritates me, AND HE'S DOING IT ON PURPOSE!"\n\nThe above assumptions cover most if not quite all of the liberal position. People are not born liberal. What kind of person does it require to take an innocent child and turn them into a liberal...? I will tell you what kind of person you need. It takes a villain.\n\nYou correctly point out that liberals are dissatisfied with Christ, this is because they largely do not have a personal sense of sin. They see no need or a Savior, they do not recognize the moral response of guilt (" 'laws' are for the governed, not for the governor") and they have lost all sense of shame.\n\nLiberals appear to recognize guilt only as a means of manipulating people; they will not admit to a real sense of moral guilt because that would be to recognize a standard be behavior above themselves. They respond to attempts to put them on the same footing with the rest of the world as attempts to shame them, and their pride will not allow them to admit that they might be mistaken. So they castigate those who would criticise them, at the same time hurling terrible and vicious attacks against their opponents, in an attempt to shame their opponents. \n\nBecause they do not realize that there must be a basis to moral accusations, their attacks are largely built on emotional appeal, and are factually invalid.\n\nThis unyeilding effort to block all sense of personal responsiblity has its parallel in an individual psychological response, called malignant narcissism.\n\nMalignant narcissism was first described by a psychologist and author Dr. M. Scott Peck in his books The Road Less Traveled, and others. He describes the resistance of some hideously selfish people to recognize their own selfishness. This was his attempt to describe the moral condition traditionally called 'evil', in psychological terms. When faced with the 'good', evil must destroy it or be forced to face its own selfishness.\n\nIn American liberalism to day, I believe that we see malignant narcissism raised to the institutional level.\n\nThe group behavior of people may be either better or worse than their individual behavior. Among Christians we recognize that we ought to continue to assemble together on a regular basis becuse we will stimulate each other to love and good works more than if we do not meet regularly.\n\nAnd, we have (unfortunately almost daily in the news) seen reports of troublemakers who, egged on by their peers, commit even more heinous acts of violence and selfishness than they would have stooped to without such provocation. What makes organized crime and gang activity so bad and so dangerous to the community is the fact that it is organized. Organization is a 'good', which was made and intended to serve other goods. It is terrible that it has been coopted and enslaved to serve evil.\n\nSo it is with liberalism in America today. (By the way, I  hope nobody has misunderstood-- this is political liberalism I am talking about. Liberal Christians are a different matter, in terms
505631
Because liberals have so much love to give to everybody. They're sort of like Michael Jackson, in that they try to give it to the wrong people. So well intentioned, yet so misunderstood.\n\nWhere as conservatives rely too much on rational thinking to form opinions. Curse this brain of mine! Curse it!