How would this effect the Statemnt of Cash Flow?
826414
The answer is a).  No cash was received.
810491
There may be a provision in the cash advance terms and conditions that if you don't use it, it is withdrawn.  You would have to check your specific terms and conditions.
92538
"cash on cash" is a rate of return measured by the first stabilized year's distributable cash flow divided by the amount of equity retired.  Distributable cash flow is the net operating income minus the cost of the debt.  So if your NOI is $10,000, and first year debt payments add up to $5,000, distributable cash flow is $5,000.  So, if you put $25,000 in equity into the investment, the "cash on cash" is $5,000/$25,000, or .2 (20%).
1045692
The UK banks are now on watch for this sort of Transaction, and will report it as suspicious if not in keeping with your normal activity.\n\nMoney laundering / Drug based activites and counter terrorism are all issues for the banking sector. You would be suprised how wide ranging the effects of recent legislation here.\n\nForgive me for saying this though. You sound out of you depth if you are asking. BE CAREFUL!
1089279
This is more complicated than can a short answer will allow but here's a start:\n\nThe method used in reporting cash flows will be apparent from the top and bottom lines.  If the top line is net income, and everything adds to net income, then they are using indirect.  If the top portion has changes in net working capital (change in receivables, change in cash, change in payables) then the firm is using direct.\n\nThe 10-K will ideally have multiple years' data, but that doesn't always happen.  However, you can look up the 10-K for the same quarter prior year for comparison purposes.  From there get comparative net income and operating cash flows.
43091
I doubt that it will be that serious. First of all, most people will not be impacted. The majority of loans made in the past few years were still 30 year fixed rate loans and most buyers made down payments. The small portion of buyers who were speculating and cannot carry the payments long-term will become foreclosures. Yes, those foreclosures will drive prices down in the areas where they happen, but not everyone has to sell. Only those sellers who are in a position where they have to sell will be impacted. Long term holders of real estate will continue to make payments and will not be impacted. If a property's value drops down below loan value there is no requirement that people will have to "come up with the difference" as you put it, unless they are forced to sell. The most likely bunch of investors that will be negatively impacted are the ones that actually follow the advice of "real estate gurus" that preach the no money down, flipping, and similar deals. I don't think they are a significant part of the market and will be glad to be rid of them for awhile. \n\nThe lenders are not stupid. They do expect some impact in places like California and Florida and are taking steps to spread their risk. Many markets are counter-cyclical and have not experienced any part of the bubble you are afraid of, so lenders are spreading their portfolio risk by lending in various markets. Texas is a good example, where appreciation has been low in single digits. \n\nReal estate markets are micromarkets, and do not behave like stocks. As any agent will tell you, location, location, and location are the keys to real estate. Good locations will mostly continue to be good locations in most cities. People will still like living in California and Florida (although the hurricane risk there makes me question their sanity). Much of the money driving the boom in these areas is foreign money. Few people realize that since the dollar has dropped almost 30% that non-US investors have been buying what they see as bargain property. After all, it is 30% cheaper than it was before for them. Many of these investors pay all cash. They will not be impacted by falling values. Unless the dollar recovers value, that money will continue to flow in. \n\nI've been through two real estate reversals, once in the early 1980's when mortgage rates actually went to 19%, and another in the early 1990's when real estate values dropped about ten to twenty percent in some markets. There was a crash in commercial real estate in the late eighties created by the Reagan administration changing the lending regulations at the same time they increased the reserve requirements for banks that led to the savings and loan bailout. That was coupled with a change in real estate depreciation laws, but this mostly impacted commercial properties (and taxpayers who paid for the bailout). Most people's lives are barely impacted by falling real estate values. Like I said the only ones that will notice are the ones that are forced to sell for some reason other than falling real estate values. \n\nBy the way, I own KBH and have made more money off of it in the form of dividends and stock payouts than I initially invested back in the 1970's. The stock has split so many times I have lost count. The stock can go to $1 and I will still show a profit.
1131608
It's not possible.  The money is guaranteed by the company that sold it to you for the cash.  Money orders and cashier's checks represent as Cash on a balance sheet.  They cannot bounce like a check.
911091
depends on cause of it\n\npresent maximization is by FII in few stocks \n\nif find a scam then it will bad \n\nthus generally 95 % unaffected by profit
341291
In some ways, yes, beause it shows the speed at which your market is turning in cash rather than disbursing it in real time, at the very least, daily.  Your accounting profit is a rather static measure of your performance for the accounting period covered.
637183
depends on the comapany
326118
Probably zero.  If the company truly has no assets, it is likely that it will be treated as having liquidated for federal income tax purposes.  Even if it has not been liquidated, there are tax rules that are designed to make it difficult or impossible to derive a benefit from buying a company that has nothing but a NOL.  I doubt you will find a well-informed buyer who is willing to take a chance that the NOL will be usable in the future.\n\nIf you (or whoever the present owner is) were to start up a new business in the company, and assuming it is not considered to have liquidated, then you might be able to use the loss carryforward.
80754
There would be a frenzy.  Look at how people are going after meaningless points, me included.  Just imagine what offering  money would do to us.
361100
That would depend on the business type. Can you clarify?
84730
Cash flow is a more pure reading of exactly how the business is doing.  EPS can have a lot of other factors that are variable from quarter to quarter, such as one time charges or different tax rates.
68626
If there is increase in net income it will increase assets in balance sheet becouse the profit will transform in assets and if decrease in profit it may go from capital side.
1105530
C.\n\nThe risk will determine how much is too much risk.  If the firm is cyclic, then the amount of debt should be lower so that the firm can still make interest payment during the down times.\n\nThe tax structure determines the amount of tax shield and also factors into the optimal capital structure.  More tax means more debt.\n\nEdit: By the way, Mark, I've gone through your papers a few years back and they were rather interesting.  I would have sent an email, but you don't have your up here on Answers and I didn't really want to invade your privacy by going through other channels.
188170
If it is about the bank balance you are asking ... it would increase the amount you owe the bank...  \n\nthe overdraft balance would increase on account of this..\n\nIf BRS is your doubt... check this \n\nhttp://futureaccountant.com/forum/index.php/topic,28.0.html\n\n\nhttp://www.futureaccountant.com/