What do you think about this new rule...?
829612
A send off rule would be crushing to the game.  It would waste time trying to get the player off the field.  In high school ball, a player is sent off automatically after a caution untill the next sub opportunity (free substitution).  The game would move slower and the opposing team will get an advantage.  \nAs far as harrasing officials, it should stop.  The laws of the game state that only the captain of the team may question a call.  If this was taken seriously, and dissenting players cautioned, we may be able to at least fake some respect for the referee.  \n\nSome time ago there was actually a "blue" card.  It was a card that sent a player off for the rest of the current game, but did not effect the next game.
343995
Good point!  I'll check out who to ask about this.\n\nWhere is the "Tell us what you think"?\n\nI found it!  http://add.yahoo.com/fast/help/us/answers/cgi_feedback\n\nI get the other points on here about how people will want further sub-categorization and the concern about general questions.  But there seems to be a lot I've read today wanting Christians out of here.  I'm willing to be moved to another location.  People are still going to be curious and peek over there.  And taunt us.  But they can't complain that we're ruining "their" spirituality section.
160854
I was happy that the 2006 racing season started again... the race was so-so... I hate the fact that the rule changes are already starting... do you remember when it was the WINSTON CUP? We never had as many WEEKLY rule changes... I understand that the sport has grown and more safety pros are involved... but I say, LET THEM RACE! Can't wait to hear what everyone is whining about later on speed and cant wait to hear what Mr. Helton has to restrict before next week's race.... ohhh boy... it wasn't broke, why try to fix it?
1092834
I agree that the refs need to let them play.  These new rules slow down the game so much.  I'm a Rangers' fan but John Davidson needs to shutup with this, "It's hooking because his stick is parallel to the ice."  This isn't math class and isn't the way the game has been played.  The NHL needs to go back to the old rules because it makes the game more exciting.  They made the rules to encourage hockey idiots to watch.  If they didn't like hockey then, they're not going to like hockey now.  It's so dumb that they make these rules for morons that have never followed the game before.  Just let the boys play the game they love playing and don't call these b.s. penalties to make it exciting. I'll be disappointed if the game-winning goal is scored on a dumb penalty.
772154
I agree but it's nothing new. It has been going on since the beginning. I think there is still integrity in politics, but sometimes you have to fight fire with fire. I think there is more balance than we realize you just have to look really hard to see it.\n\nLook at how wild the media/mtv has gotten and yet people seem to be getting more uptight and judgemental and there are way more rules (laws) against things than I remember as a kid.
415583
No...its stupid....they should change it...i got my best answer right away..the next 2 or 3 were ok then the rest were crap
733183
That's a good idea they can track the cows right to their stalls.But they wont,that's too smart isn't it?\n\nHere's a question that got deleted by the brave people here.I don't see the violation \n\nIf Democrats win the House and/or the Senate, will it be harder?\nQuestion Details: for the Bush administration to push through so-called free trade agreements and the free-trade-at-all-costs agenda? What do you think ? Do you favor this plan for free trade or not ?\n\nReason of Violation:Chatting & Personal Communications\n\nThats the entire question ,I had closed it and chosen the best answer before someone went back on my questions and reported it.Its very frustrating,but I am just amazed at people.
1141394
It was right, but I am thinking this is just an internet thing. But hey that is just my opinion. \n\nGood Luck!
775159
This is a new regulation on Yahoo, I am surprised you haven't heard about it, it's called the "stupidity-factor of questions asked" You'll get a violation for this, repeat offenders will spend a Day in solitary confinement.
1105667
That's the greatest thing I've seen all day! Thank you. I'm pretty sure it's going to be a short term clause, but it's good to see somebody trying to work within the system. It' won't work in the long run, but bringing public awareness around is a good step (if a small one) towards political change. Plus, it's pirates! How cool is that?! Avast! Arrgghh!
995289
All of it. It is all under review, and due for a complete overhaul upgrade. Some aspects will be kept similar or the same, but the majority of the rules are expected to change toward more complicated, difficult to understand terms and conditions, allowing more loopholes, even though the authorities claim the purpose is to simplify and make it so anyone can understand. This is a commonplace political tactic used globally, particularly in Western countries, to impede the public understanding and increase control and ability to manipulate the masses for unjust purposes. There is very little you can do about this, now that you know. Sorry.
993912
It is against the guidline: http://groups.yahoo.com/local/guidelines.html\n\nBut, policy is just plicy if no one care. Yahoo can't police all groups without the help from the members.\n\nSince you are one of the member, why don't you report this to Yahoo? The link I posted above have the reporting link.
1028539
Why would this majority rule then be correct? As in, who gives you the right over someone else? You'll force them? That doesn't make sense. Beyond this, I'd love to see a transcultural model that actually works. It won't. Because guess what? Are you going to let everyone practice religion? Whatever one they want? Even if it goes against your code? If you don't, this won't work. Also, if you apply certain moral codes, and someone doesn't ascribe to them, so what? What are you gonna do? Punish them for bad morals? If you don't, then what was the purpose in the first place? If you do, then you have become an oppressive society. And before you become one of those you had better be sure you know what you're doing. Another point, because everyone believes it doesn't make it right. What if you wanted to amend it later on to say that killing is OK? Would it then be OK? If you have a universal standard of morality, then it can't change, otherwise what's the point? If it can't change, then majority rule is not the determining factor of universal moral guidelines. So what makes your first majority any more special than the ones to come? This is illogical, impractical and unfeasible at best.
1069823
his policy is BS..i wouldn't watch my family get hurt and just stand there.  but on the other hand, if the rule wasn't so strict, players would just hop into the stands for the littlest thing...so i dono.  i think the policy is fine, but if my family was in trouble, i wouldn't care about being suspended or fined.
433244
Follow the default rules, don't try to make things interesting for the first time.  I have seen people changing rules so it becomes extremely favor to RBs, and the commissioner doesn't even know.  Be ware of this weird situation.
1050840
No. The changes aren't good, they lead to confusions. We shouldn't change the established rules even if they are from the early days of physics. Tradition and quality,  they go hand in hand.  Maybe if a extraterrestrial civilization will conquer the Earth, they will be electrocuted by our machines, or at least they couldn't use them. This is a good policy to protect ourselves from intruders.
668576
I think its cool. \nI like this change-for-the-better.