Why do punitive damages go to the person who has been compensated?
832242
Because the reality is that if there is no incentive, then plaintiff will not make a claim for punitive damages.  It takes money to prosecute a claim, and most people will not do so for free.
598565
You can sue them for violating their contract in order to force them to follow the bylaws, but you would need to prove that there was damage and what exactly it was (not necesarily in a quantity of money) in order to receive any payment.
902232
If the person signed a contract saying they would be liable for the costs of treatment, they are liable. Take them to small claims court.
801153
It depends on where you live.  However most small claims courts do not allow suits for punitive damages.  You have a case, however you will most likely only receive the amount you paid for the pictures.
175119
I imagine the case law varies significantly.  Obviously it would be a matter of scale where the injury has a significant impact on the one injured.  \n\nMy other, a lawyer got something like 50 bucks from someone when she cut herself on their product.  She could have gotten a lot more if it were a substantial injury.
293600
They give you the second chance in case the purchaser does not pay or returns it. A lot of times when someone purchases something it does not get paid for, so they offer a second chance just in case.
787286
It does because it serves the Defendant of those cases more than the Plaintiff.\n\nIf I get injured by a product, the severity of the injury should determine what is right. \n\nHypothetical situation: I light a fire cracker and it burns me, well that is what I get for playing with a firecracker. But if I'm killed under the same situation (and we know a firecracker shouldn't have that much of a charge in it), my wife, kids, or anyone that would have a fruitfull life if I was still alive should get just compensation if I was still alive.\n\nThe first situation is frivilous, but the second situation isn't. That is why liability is a touchy issue. But that is what the courts are supposed to do, draw a line until we change the law.
56315
If you are found liable for the injuries of the other person, then you are liable for that amount.  If they get a judgment against you for $1.5M, then they can go after your house, your business, your personal property, 401(k), etc.  If you don't have the money or don't own property, you are considered "judgment proof."  Some people might consider going into bankruptcy after taking such a hit.
825840
(1) Send the demand letter, requesting your $$ back; however, do not say that you will request punitive damages if they do not settle, give them a time limit to respond say 1 month to 6 weeks, then file suit. (2) if you sue, then ask for court cost and lawyer fees (missed work  and transportationcannot be recovered under the law)and ask for punitive damages (do not specify an amount, the court might give you more or less than the $1000.00 you are seeking )  the court can award punitive damages if the actions of the company was wrong. I WOULD CHECK AND SEE IF THIS COULD BE TAKEN TO A NJ SMALL CLAIMS COURT, THAT WAY YOU WOULD NOT NEED AN ATTORNEY.
403216
the executor of the estate is supposed to divie up the remains equally, i think; and that means for everything that is sold you get an equal share.  if they sold it, it doesnt matter if they already spent their portion of what they got, they still owe you your share.  you can sue them.  its a shame people act so selfishly and unethical towards each other when their parent dies.
1166712
If the damage caused by your neighbour was depreciated from the value of your car before the insurance company issued their final settlment, you should be compensated by your neighbour for that lost value. Should your neighbour reneg on his promise, with proper evidence that your neighbour was responsible for that damage, and proper evidence that your insurance did in fact give you less because of outstanding damage on the car, you should prevail in small claims court and recover your loss.
839136
Like the other person said, get a hold of your old attorney and explain the situation. Your second should have been included. I fyour attorney made a mistake, he is liable for any damages you suffer as a result from this. It seems like your second got transfered to the loss mitigation department and what they stated, is normal protocol for a second to do.\n\nRegards
652969
They aren't compensated, but you can sue the state for compensation.\n\nYou have to have permission to sue the state, but they'll give you permission and probably settle with you to compensate.
73901
There is no way to "beat" the case now that you have already lost it.  It can be appealed, but that would cost more than paying it.  The best thing you can do is reach an agreement about paying off the judgment against you.  You are bound to pay off the judgment (I presume the court found you owed money and didn't order particular steps about how you should repay) but it can be hard to actually collect, and most people eventually agree to payment schedules rather than trying to force total immediate payment.
496000
it really all depends on the natyre of the injury i beleive.  A lot of times it is done in a settlement...but it may vary from palce to place so take a look at some government web sites to get more informed.
132471
Hi Mitzi-\nI'm very familiar with PA law.  The theft is going to be based upon the amount involved.  I can almost guarantee that there will have to be restitution.  Sentencing depends on the person's past criminal history (if any), the facts of the case...if it was particularly heinous and the victims involved, etc. and the amount of cash or items taken.
967194
The judge did not commit a crime.  He did the job he was paid to do and did it in good faith.\n\nThe victim will have to seek compensation, usually through legal action.