Who has the power to make treaties with with foreign countries??
816962
The President (or his representatives) has the power to negotiation treaties, but they must be ratified by 2/3 of the Senate (as per Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution).  If the treaty requires a change to existing U.S. law, then those changes would have to pass Congress like any other law.
587238
Well it would depend on the Constitution of the particular country.  But as an example the United States and Great Britain both have bi-cameral legistative systems.
531473
Huh?  There have been numerous international agreements that limit how wars can be waged.  The simple matter of that is war is bloody, but extremely necessary.  Get over it.  \n\nI'd suggest you read up on the "Law of Armed Conflict"  or "LOAC."
161208
They must go by the laws of the country in which they are operating.
279380
A bribe or Protection Payments?\n\nSeriously I believe that it is a called a Mutual Defense Treaty, i do know that the United States has entered into quite a few of them over the years.\n\n1949 - NATO Treaty; April 4\n\n\n1951 - Defense of Greenland: Agreement Between the United States and the Kingdom of Denmark, April 27\n\n\n1951 - Defense of Iceland: Agreement Between the United States and the Republic of Iceland, May 5\n\n\n1951 - Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of the Philippines; August 30\n\n\n1951 - Security Treaty Between the United States, Australia, and New Zealand (ANZUS); September 1\n\n\n1951 - Military Facilities in the Azores: Agreement Between Portugal and the United States, September 6\n\n\n1951 - Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan; September 8\n\n\n1951 - Military Assistance Agreement Between the United States and Yugoslavia, November 14\n\n\n1953 - Military Facilities in Spain: Agreement Between the United States and Spain, September 26\n\n\n1953 - Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of Korea; October 1\n\n\n1953 - United States Use of Defense Facilities: Agreement Between the United States and the Kingdom of Greece, October 12\n\n\n1954 - Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty (Manila Pact); September 8\n\n\n1954 - Protocol to the Manila Pact, September 8\n\n\n1954 - Pacific Charter, September 8\n\n\n1954 - Joint United States-Chinese Statement; December 1\n\n\n1954 - Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of China; December 2\n\n\n1954 - Exchange of Notes Between the Secretary of State and the Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs, December 10\n\n\n1949 - NATO Treaty; April 4\n\n\n1951 - Defense of Greenland: Agreement Between the United States and the Kingdom of Denmark, April 27\n\n\n1951 - Defense of Iceland: Agreement Between the United States and the Republic of Iceland, May 5\n\n\n1951 - Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of the Philippines; August 30\n\n\n1951 - Security Treaty Between the United States, Australia, and New Zealand (ANZUS); September 1\n\n\n1951 - Military Facilities in the Azores: Agreement Between Portugal and the United States, September 6\n\n\n1951 - Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan; September 8\n\n\n1951 - Military Assistance Agreement Between the United States and Yugoslavia, November 14\n\n\n1953 - Military Facilities in Spain: Agreement Between the United States and Spain, September 26\n\n\n1953 - Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of Korea; October 1\n\n\n1953 - United States Use of Defense Facilities: Agreement Between the United States and the Kingdom of Greece, October 12\n\n\n1954 - Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty (Manila Pact); September 8\n\n\n1954 - Protocol to the Manila Pact, September 8\n\n\n1954 - Pacific Charter, September 8\n\n\n1954 - Joint United States-Chinese Statement; December 1\n\n\n1954 - Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of China; December 2\n\n\n1954 - Exchange of Notes Between the Secretary of State and the Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs, December 10\n\n\n1949 - NATO Treaty; April 4\n\n\n1951 - Defense of Greenland: Agreement Between the United States and the Kingdom of Denmark, April 27\n\n\n1951 - Defense of Iceland: Agreement Between the United States and the Republic of Iceland, May 5\n\n\n1951 - Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of the Philippines; August 30\n\n\n1951 - Security Treaty Between the United States, Australia, and New Zealand (ANZUS); September 1\n\n\n1951 - Military Facilities in the Azores: Agreement Between Portugal and the United States, September 6\n\n\n1951 - Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan; September 8\n\n\n1951 - Military Assistance Agreement Between the United States and Yugoslavia, November 14\n\n\n1953 - Military Facilities in Spain: Agreement Bet
865921
Good luck with that.  Who's going to come and get him, and why would we let them?  We're not a signatory of that treaty.
592318
Lots of things.  Many companys need contracts that can be enforced in a variety of countries.  International lawyers pick the law that will apply to the contract and write the contract according to that law.  International Lawyers draft treaties and negotiate international loans.  It can be dull at times but some of it is very neat.
749184
The power to act with a specif law
458954
Iran has right to have the nulcear power if us, and other countries have. There is possibility of use of nuclear power against any country from the other countreis too.
1060705
No, he cannot. Any treaty must be approved by the Senate. And any change to this country's Constitution must be ratified by the people.\n\nThis ain't gonna happen.\n\nIs this even a real issue, or is it some bogeyman story?
233566
In short, because anything of significance required unanimous agreement, it was becoming unwieldy to act as a general government.  Two areas where this stood out.  One was acting as the singular contact with foreign sovereignties.  The other was in collecting funds from the States to pay for the general government.
926023
Anything is possible under international law, particularly for clear cut territories like UK/US. To avoid expensive lawyers fees, you can get legal advise in the UK (or even Legal Aid) to obtain an injunction... that's assuming the other party is legit/operational.
925643
here's a good website has all the treaties and even what they said in them http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/ntreaty/ntreaty.htm
96004
geez, your in big trouble if you are doing a term paper here, try google. key word treaty, paris, 1783.
478985
The United States must abide by laws that govern such things as international trade and human rights.  The United States, as is with every other nation, is not required to abide by the edicts passed by the United Nations.  \n\nIf they elect not to abide by a law that it feels is unfair or against the United States' interests they can refuse to uphold that law.  The consequences could include cooled relationships with other countries, embargos and even U N sanctioned war.
166981
Definite NO! If that were to happen, then freewill would be forfeited to that power. If one disagrees with that power, it could mean death for that person.\n\nThis is going to happen though, in the not-too-distant future. America is that Superpower. You've already witnessed what happened in Afghanistan, Iraq, etc. Soon America's going to just overrule the UN Security council & do what she pleases with the world. I say overrule in the assumption that 1 or 2 countries may disagree with this but most of them will agree with being ruled by America.
998924
I don't know. I guess there is no way for us to know which country signed first because they agreed upon it simultaneously. Unless you want to know by fact, who was the first representative to jot down a signature! Haha, I really don't know. But all I know is that, only Somalia and the United States have not ratified the CRC. Somalia is currently unable to proceed to ratification as it has no recognized government.