To all liberals and Democrats who complained that President Bush never used a veto?
829606
Line item veto! First of all you who are for the government helping you pay for health care, giving you minimum wage increases, dumping more in social programs? Who is going to pay for it? Hell lets just steal it from the rich and call it a tax! I want my share from those rich bastards! Which what is considered rich? Beings the upper 10% of wage earners pay 60% of the taxes. Why don't you use one of them government handouts called pell grants and student loans, and get yourself and education, then a job, and then pay higher taxes because you have lived right?
698491
Yah by all means lets keep this lie going. I don't think everyone has heard it yet\n There is no liberal media bias. This is one of the BIG LIES told to keep people from questioning our government.
948135
The reason President Bush has not been impeached is that he has not committed an impeachable offense. The liberals’ constant rant that he lied is in fact a lie. He acted on the same information that congress did when they authorized the war in Iraq. He did not lie under oath as Clinton did. In fact, his biggest fault is that he has been brutally honest and the liberals don’t agree with what he has to say. That doesn’t make it a lie. I wish the liberals would come up with a meaningful rant, but I don’t think they’re capable of it.
496021
No, there are many things that congress does that should be vetoed. The veto power is an important power in our government... even if Bush refuses to veto anything. It gives the President the power to curtail congress. An example of when it should be used has been in the news recently, where congress wants to stick all sorts of pet projects into the spending bill for the troops in Iraq, and pay for some of the Katrina relief. Congress critters seem to think that if they stick their stupid projects, like the railroad to nowhere, or the bridge to nowhere in Alaska, into a bill like this, they will automatically get approved. That needs to stop, and the veto power allows the president to stop it, if he chooses to.\n\nCheers :)
1072764
I haven't seen him but I have seen other right-wing nut jobs posting all the time spewing their hatred for us Liberals.  Just because we don't agree with everything Bush says or does doesn't make us scum suckers as one guy put it.
222892
Well, according to all the SUPER INTELLIGENT liberals - you're crazy.\n\nFortunately, no one with an IQ over 55 pays any attention to them insofar as having any VALID points on how to IMPROVE things. If MANTRAS and WHINING translated to ACTUAL PROGRESS - we'd be living in LIBERAL UTOPIA right now.\n\nPersonally, I lean right - but I wouldn't be sorry to see Bush pack his bags and move out tonight. He has surrounded himself with idiots - just like his father did. He's out of touch with the public in general and most of his support base specifically. \n\nAs I say frequently: Bush is a MORON - but he's still 100 X BETTER than ANYONE the LIBERAL DEMOCRATS have.\n\n\nstephenvest@...: Steve buddy! Snap out of it! get a grip! ANYONE that checks your history of questions will RECOGNIZE YOU for EXACTLY the LITTLE LEFTY PROPAGANDA MONGER YOU ARE... THAT is the ONLY REASON you're here. Sad to be THAT RABID over such CRAPPY PHILOSOPHIES. You need to get out more into the REAL WORLD.
519737
I agree with you.  I'm an Independent, and I'm really appalled by the level of belligerence and irrationality coming from the liberal left.  (I know that Democrats are not the same as liberals, but the party has lately chosen to align itself with those extreme left elements, which is why I would not vote for a Democrat right now).
32155
It's so funny that Democrats used Bush's grades as an issue during the Kerry Presidential campaign and Kerry actually did worse than Bush in school. It's little things like the truth and facts that get in the way of liberal arguments all the time. Man, that must hurt...
820394
Ever hear off Veto power everything in this country is about to be put on lock down due to party politics.  Bush wants this and the Dems want that and neither will get anything.  Every election year I realize more and more why I hate our political system.
996695
~Actually, as much as I hate to have to say it, just as with Lyndon Johnson, what he has done is within his right under the constitution or enabling legislation.  If you want to complain, that's all well and good but you have to be specific and know what you're talking about.  It's when imbeciles shoot their mouths off out of ignorance that folks like Trickie Dick and Georgie the Younger get their support from the balance of the uninformed hoi poloi.
519525
They obviously didn't teach you grammar.  \n\nNobody likes war but did you ever think that had Clinton paid more attention to world affairs during his stay in the Oval Office Bush Jr. may not have had an excuse to go to war.  Being selective in which party you criticize and taking such extreme stances while doing so will only contribute to this nations political problems, assuming you even voted last time.
895920
At no point during his presidency did George Bush wear a crown. He was not, nor is he autonomous. The decisions regarding Iraq are not his alone. He had backing, remember? Many democrats were among those backers initially.
988273
First off thank you very much for telling the truth on here.  Bush is a great president and there is no reason to impeach him.  Liberals are so unhappy that there is no decent liberal cadidate for president they have to rip apart ours in any way possible, sad huh.  It is worth it for the libs to lie about our country so it looks bad making our president look bad, pathetic.
50355
The reason Bush is still President is due to the fact that he has not been impeached, The reason why he was elected was because unfortunately the democrats can not come up with a reasonable candidate that can stand on issues versus hate speech. This has been demonstrated here and is another indication of republicans taking the white house again in 2008. You hear about the"lies, the half-a** answers, The bad grammar, or lack of leadership" but never examples of such. His approval rating at this time in his presidency is actually higher then Bill Clinton's was during the same time in his administration. Its a shame that a party that stood for the common man with heros such as FDR and Kennedy(JFK of course) Has turned into a bunch of people who have no dream, have no desire to build, just the ability to whine and complain. I disagree with the President on many things but what i like about him is that he does what he says he will. This is a welcome change. If democrats want the White house back, stop being afraid of being called a liberal and show people a better way, not just calling our leader(like him or not) a retard. The most important thing in order to be taken seriously is the ability to respect the differences in others and being able to debate the issues instead of name calling and threatening to move out of the USA if your opponent gets elected. (BTW im still waiting for many of Hollywood to keep their word and leave.)  Just my opinion, remember you asked and know that I respect your right to express yours.
984004
Clinton did kill people too . He also was otherwise preoccupied when the terrorists were planning 911. He let Bin Laden go free. More than 40 people who had dealings with Clinton died mysteriously. Bush is A man of integrity. He stopped Saddam before he had his nuclear weapon. Clinton gave away the instructions on how to builds one. Liberals are impossible to deal with. Illogical people are that way. They don't let facts get in the way of a good Bush bashing. I wish they could study your pea brains and figure what went wrong. Aussie chick this is none of your business.
869494
Another liberal American hater. Instead of just being haters how about come up with some ideas that would help make this world a better place. The democrats have not worked with this President or this congress at all. During the Clinton administration the Republicans crossed party lines and approved all of his judicial nominees and passed many pieces of legislation because they want to be a part of the solution and not the problem. Liberals are the most despicable people on earth. I rate them right up there with the French.
138279
President Bush made certain commitments at the site of the World Trade Center in NYC (right after the cowardly attacks on America by terrorists) that he would fight terrorists wherever they are.  Almost everyone agreed with him then, especially Congress including most prominent Democrats.  He has stuck to his guns and has not broken under tremendous pressure from the liberal far left.  There have been no further attacks on US soil, knock on wood, thanks to President Bush and many terrorist leaders have been killed or captured.  The liberal far left has not offered a single alternative to resist terrorism.  Oh, they proposed that we go get Osama bin Laden; but don't invade any foreign soil!  Thanks for nothing.\n\nHe could change his policies to placate the fiery Liberals (but believes that would be very wrong for US safety).  The Democrats taught his father how viscious they can be when he said "Read my lips, no new taxes" but caved in to Democrat pressure when he allowed modest new taxes to help pay for the first Gulf War that liberated Kuwait from Saddam.  You just know the Democrats would be the first to jump all over George W. if he breaks his word to the American people and eases up on terrorists, encouraging them to grow even stronger and violent here and around the world.\n\nThe Liberals want to put our soldiers in jail and throw away the key for any mistakes they make, but send a former Liberal-Democrat US Attorney General (Ramsey Clark) to defend Saddam at his nut case trial.  They should install cheering bleaches just for the US Liberals in the courthouse.