wts the best way to understand physics ?
822971
spend more time on physics and chemistry and less time on the other two. And READ READ READ
408399
Best damn site period.  I use it all the time.\n\n\nhttp://www.advancedphysics.org/
288638
I think it is the best\n\nhttp://www.physicsclassroom.com\n\ninside the website\nmotion\nphysics tutorial > 1d kinematics\n\nforce\nNewtons laws
656520
when you look at different theories in physics , there is some sort of limitations with the theory so there is always a need of the other theory.\nin case of your question i prefer both depending on the application and the simplicity of getting the solution.\nif dealing with speeds comparable with light speed and the elementary particle physics i will go with Q mech. but if there is a problem of motion in space of a body of definite and fixed mass then i will solve through newton laws.\nalthough the laws in Q.mech. can be converted to the laws of classical mech.via the CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE. thus depending on the application we can use either Q.Mech. or Newtonian one
657657
1. read vociferously\n\n2. find a good teacher; save yourself a lot of money in losses and invest it in a proper education of trading
31825
http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/\n\nThey have open material from courses taught at MIT. I have been able to glean a lot from them.
1162008
Most of these principles are addressed in detail in physics text books.  Perhaps you might try at a local college or high school  library.
614330
It sounds like you are talking about an area of science known as quantum mechanics, though you might be referencing subatomic particle theory.  Yes, the math can be a bit much and the conceptualizations a bit forced.  But not knowing you I am hestitant to say no way.  Maybe you could should start out with little thermodynamics.\n\nThe first site below is one called HyperPhysics.  The link will send you straight to the grid on thermodynmics.  Try tapping the buttons, read and little and see if it makes sense.  I suggest you start with kinetics.  If HyperPhysics doesn't do it for you, try Wikipedia.  If you want to leap in head first the last reference is about string theory, tachyons and all that good stuff.  Good luck and heppy learning.
927184
here's what I want to know:  is there anything you enjoy about physics?\n\nI know that's an odd question, but here's why I'm asking:  if you approach your studies as an opportunity to learn something new, it'll become less of a chore and a memorization thing. Concentrate on learning concepts rather than facts and formulas. \n\nIn high school you're taught to regurgitate information. In college it's usually (hopefully) different. Most professors want to broaden your mind, and that's not going to happen if you're just spitting out facts and figures. \n\nThe best way to stop worrying is to enjoy the process. Really.\n\nI'd recommend going to the prof and asking him what you're doing wrong--tell him you really want to succeed in his class.  (you may be surprised by his response, hopefully in a positive way)
696750
try the following. they are really helpful.\n\nwww.tutor4physics.com\nwww.physicsclassroom.com
107748
http://regentsprep.org/Regents/physics/physics.cfm\nhttp://www.sparknotes.com/physics/\nhttp://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/phys/Class/BBoard.html\n\ngreat sites, the 3rd one is the best
49314
Sorry, but with the time you spent typing these questions you could of looked them up in your physics book or googled them.  Sometimes getting others to do your leg work isn't always the best answer to a problem.  Good Luck in your new class!
779341
http://www.sirinet.net/~jgjohnso/matter.html\nhttp://www.usoe.k12.ut.us/curr/science/sciber00/7th/matter/sciber/intro.htm\nhttp://www.stcms.si.edu/pom/pom_student.htm\n\nhope they are helpful
55028
I can, the problem is that it's a bit long (but not that hard). the demo can be found in every physics book (e.g. Physics of solid state, C. Kittel)
438745
try wingfields art of mechanical motion, doubleday i think.
704188
Quantum Physics is the Science and Study of Atomic Particles, the most basic of which is the Electron, the Proton and the Neutron, and the futher study of the constituent parts of those particles, Quarks, Muons, Gluons, etc etc etc.\n\nThe Standard Model is the best way to learn these particles. There is (apparently) no rhyme or reason as to the why's and wherefor's of the Standard Model - meaning that nobody knows WHY the weights are what they are, nobody knows why the numbers shake out the way they do and the particles organize themselves the way they do - this is one of the last great mysteries of Physics that modern M-Theory (String or SuperString Theory) is attempting to answer.\n\nHere's a good link or three\n\nOf them all, I would recommend the Wiki as a great place to start... Take notes, it's fairly complex, you can do it!
412724
Best way is to learn from books. Don't trust the e-book courses online. Books give a more comprehensive look into how to use technical anaysis.