Who here can name all nine Supreme Court Justices without looking them up?
820716
Good Q... i doubt i can\n\nkennedy, thomas, scalia, ginsberg, roberts, alito...\n\nthat's all i can do from my head
625553
HUHHH??? whose names?????
98389
The decision in Hammer v. Degenhart was rendered in 1918.  The following were the members of the Supreme in that year.\n\nChief Justice :\nEdward Douglass White\n\nAssociate Justices:\nJoseph McKenna\nOliver Wendell Holmes\nWilliam Rufus Day\nWillis Van Devanter\nMahlon Pitney\nJames Clark McReynolds\nLouis Dembitz Brandeis\nJohn Hessin Clarke
590142
Nine. New appointee Judge Roberts is the new Supreme Court Justice.
1107670
The nine members of the Supreme Court are referred to as Justices.  They have drivers which double as bodyguards.  They pick them up at their residences in the morning and drive them to the Supreme Court building.  There are armed guards throughout the building and its perimeter.  \n   Once the session has ended for the day, their respective drivers take them home or wherever else they may be going.  They do not have secret service detail for their private residences, unless it is warranted by some threat.\n   Recently, Justice David Souter was required to have protection at his home.  Protesters were trying to have his house condemned in response to the Court's decision over an eminent domain case in the northeast with which they were extremely displeased the with outcome of the trial.
231018
There maybe more than one person with the name but from my source have given you a page where search for the name is listed. I hope this will answer your question.
848706
I apologize for the above comments of my colleagues. I find that sometimes people in this field forget that we all started somewhere.\n\nAs for your question, FindLaw.com which is usually a great free site will not be much help to you.  This is because in the instance of Supreme Court briefs, FindLaw's data starts in 1999, and the cases you have listed are all in 1996.\n\nHonestly, I can't think of a site that lists all third party briefs to a specific supreme court case out for you, so you will probably have to find data then read through it \n\nOne more tip:\nCheck and see if your school has a subscription to Westlaw.com\n\nGood Luck
865588
Here's my list:\n\nDarryl Dawkins\nMoses Malone\nKevin Garnett\nJermaine O'Neal\nTracy McGrady\nKobe Bryant\nAmare Stoudemire\nLebron James\n\nSo far, I got 8.
70571
If you could categorize Justices empirically and state without qualification that four were always ultra conservative and four were always ultra liberal the ninth justice would be the 'swing vote' commanding a majority of five for whichever wing he or she sided with.\n\nMore likely this varies issue to issue.  You might have three solid pro-abortion votes, three solid anti-abortion votes with the othe three justices being the 'swing votes.'  The same would apply to any other hot button issues like gun control.
409138
I can tell the names of several that don't.
660620
no one\nat least publically known
61657
And what's so interesting about that? All the currently seated Supreme Court justices had enough votes for confirmation. That's the way it works.
99465
The new Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court is John Roberts.
555877
Access Supreme Court Decisions or plainview doctrine.
1166302
hurray for Scalia. About time some common sense came to the court. Hope we can get alot more like him in there.  Get back to following the constitution and not the whim of justices like Briar and Ginsburg.
1013068
anita roddick\nmartha stewart\noprah winfrey\nAlison Goligher\nindira nooyi\nmeg whitman\nKim Winser\nAnnette Court
178935
BLACKMUN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which WHITE, STEVENS, O'CONNOR, and SOUTER, JJ., joined. SCALIA, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, post, p. 623. KENNEDY, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which REHNQUIST, C. J., and THOMAS, J., joined, post, p. 628.