choose the sentence that illustrates the correct agreement of subject and verb?
823716
When you use either/or, or neither/nor, the verb must agree with the subject that is closest to it. B and C as you have typed them here are both correct. Hopefully you will apply that knowledge to your other homework items and do them yourself.
419607
This answer depends upon the way the words are used.  If you are saying something along the lines of " The answer was clear to him and me." That would be correct since you want to use 'him' and 'me' separately in order to check the accuracy of use. ie. The answer was clear to HIM..  and The answer was clear to ME.  Each works so the original sentence is correct. \nAs for 'you and him', this would be used in a sentence such as "The punishment will apply to you and him". This is correct for the same reason.  Separate the two and see if each works properly.  \nYou will notice that each works with each of these sentences..  It is not always so, such as with 'he and I' or 'me and him'. If you think of each personal pronoun separately, it is not difficult to decide.
300603
Your sentence doesn't make a great deal of sense because you can't have a question mark in the middle of a sentence.\n\nI'd go with two words:  thank you.
877892
Simple subject - we\nSimple predicate  - should do ("do" alone is incorrect...this is a verb phrase)
1149709
There are two basic parts to a sentence: the subject part and the predicate part. The subject part contains the simple subject and all of its modifiers. The predicate part contains the verb and all of its modifiers.\n\nExample: Mary who is the girl who scored the winning  goal in the high school finals became a star in college three years later.\n\n"Mary who is the girl who scored the winning  goal in the high school finals" is the subject part of the sentence. Mary is the simple subject.\n\n"became a star three years later in college" is the predicate part of the sentence. Became is the verb of the sentence.\n\nThe subject part is what the sentence is about, and the predicate part makes a statement about the subject part.\n\nI hope this helps!!
68942
sì, é proprio corretto. However, the really correct sentence would be: Sei il mio eroe.
1089803
First, to answer your comma question: Your second sentece is correct. 'If you give me money' is a dependent clause: it relies on 'I'll order a pizza' to make complete sense, so a comma is needed to correctly combine the two clauses that form your sentence.\nThe first link below explains more about dependent and independent clauses and how to combine them with correct punctuation.\n\nNow, to the subject-verb agreement question: The first sentence is correct. Again, this is about dependent and independent clauses, as well as subject-verb agreement. To identify the subject of the sentence, try removing the phrase that is in between the two commas. When you do this, you can clearly see that your verb must agree in the singular, because you are talking about 'the bus'. 'The bus' is the subject of your sentence. \n\nThe phrase in between the commas is a dependent clause: to make sense it needs context from the other parts of your sentence. Without context, the phrase 'in addition to three cars' makes no sense, so it cannot be the subject of your sentence. \n\nYou could turn this sentence around by moving the nouns:\n'Three cars, in addition to the bus, are a total loss.' Note how the verb agrees with 'three cars' now, and not with 'the bus'. The phrase in the middle is still not able to stand by itself as a complete idea, so it is dependent and cannot be the subject of your sentence\nThe second link will help you understand subject-verb agreement a bit more, too.\n\nI've emailed this to you, as well. I hope it helps!
1029094
Three is plural, so the form of the verb "is," should be *are.*\n\nThere are 3...... and since the number is under ten..... you're supposed to write it out:\n\nThere are three.\n\n\n** Oh, and it is not incomplete.  A sentence is a sentence when it has both a subject and a verb.  You don't need a direct object or subject compliment to complete a sentence.  The word "there" is a place.  (A noun is a person, place, thing, or idea.)  Therefore, the subject is "there."  The verb is "are" which is a form of the infinitive "to be," which is a linking verb.  The word "three" is an adjective that's used as a subject compliment.  Subject and verb are in place- sentence is complete.
798050
You should say...\n\nYo no lo tenía permitido pero de todas formas vi el show.\nor\n\nYo no lo tenía permitido pero de todos modos vi el show.\nor\n\nYo no lo tenía permitido pero de todas maneras vi el show\n\nyou can invert to the order in all 3 sentences, for example...\n\nyo no lo tenía permitido pero vi el show de todas formas.
66520
"Grammar"\n\nIn the second half of your continueing sentence you are referring back to the first half when it should be treated as two seperate sentences at a minimum.
597711
Can you form a sentence that makes any sense?
897074
you could either use a comma as you have or change the sentence to.... i am in good physical condition and exercise every day.
698038
Gone Car - Jay and R M both have the right idea here. For purposes of clarity and ease of understanding, whenever possible a pronoun should be used in a sentence after the noun to which it refers. The sentence as you present it is not good English for this reason. Instead you could say here\n\n"Do you think it is a good idea when we study a sentence to break it and then restructure it?"\n\nor \n\n "Do you think it is a good idea to break a sentence and then reconstruct it when we are studying it?"\n\nor \n\n"Do you think, when we study a sentence, it is a good idea to break it and then restructure it?"\n\nor\n\n"When we study a sentence is it a good idea, do you think, to break it and then restructure it?"\n\n\nThese sentences are all correct, but I like the first two a little more than the last two because I think they are simpler in form and therefore a little easier to understand.  Notice though that in all four sentences here the "it"  which occurs twice and which refers to "sentence" is found both times after the word "sentence" has already been used. That just makes it easier for everyone to understand. Note also that in the first sentence you could include commas after "idea" and "sentence" if you like.\n\n-m
152278
When I was in high school, my spanish teacher taught us the proper verb agreement by making a good sized 8 sided dice (dye?) On the dye there was a subject and a choice of 2 or 3 verbs. The teacher starts off the game by throwing the dye to a student, they roll the dye, say the question out loud, and then answer it. If they answer it correctly, they get to throw it to any student they want in the room, but if the student gets it wrong they give it back to the teacher. You could make an incentive for those who get it right in one try if you'd like, but we never got any lol.
62172
B\n\nIf you would use the word "Us" then it should be "Me".\nIf you would use the word "We" then it should be "I".\n\nLorna and I went to school. We went to school.\nHe gave the book to us. He gave the book to Lorna and me.\n\nSo the correct form is: "The basketball bounced right between Lorna and me."\n\nItself, ourselves, myself refer to reflexive action. Reflexive action is done by and to the same person or group.\n\nI gave myself a shampoo. We gave ourselves the day off.
268304
It's B; I'm very certain.\n\n"A" has a subject, verb, and a direct object.\n"C" has a subject, verb, and a prepositional phrase.\n\nBut "B" is the one that has a subject complement, "better," which describes the subject, "I."
789858
with = con \n\nor you can say "acompañado con" which is accompanied with.. depends on what you're trying to say :) but in most cases just leave it at "con"