Constitutional law question on the prerogative?
824213
Prerogatives can only be validly exercised if it is within the powers of the official or entity as provided for in the Constitution.
1114941
When the Senate figures out how to get around the Constitutionality problem their bill has right now, or when one of the alternatives being introduced come up for a vote.\n\nYou could write or email your Congressmen to find out, and let them know of your interest.
852376
One condition: when it's requested.\n\nExample: your question.
441652
You should read the constitution before you ask constitutional questions
531123
For the people that don't know what that is:\n\nhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment04/\n The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.\n\nIt really is sad to see those soldiers fighting for freedom when freedom is being taken away.
349463
You are of course referring to Article 4 of the U.S. constitution....no cheating...you are going to have to read it to understand state's powers and limitations.....
166074
Knowing the answer before the question is asked.
134880
Ow!  What are you, pre-law?
464314
It decides whether or not pre-trial identification of the defendant violated their constitutional rights and, if it did, what should be done about it.
546447
The US Constituion say no but not only that it is one of those unalienabel rights that have been endowed by our creator.  The hand of big government can slap anyone so I say challenge the cult of the omnipotent state.\n\nIn Liberty,\nEric H. Smith
926888
Read the 4th, 5th, and 6th articles of the Constitution. One of them has the answer.
340101
The Supreme Court hears arguments from both parties to the case.  A party may decide to use public opinion as part of their argument, but decisions on constitutional questions are typically decided based on the text of the constitution, the historical reasons for adopting the provision in question & previous decisions of the United States Supreme Court.  Decisions from lower courts, both state and federal, are relevant considerations, but it's not necessary for them to decide.
334684
Yes. And if you doubt that answer, ask people the following questions:\n\n1. What 5 rights are guaranteed by the 1st amendment (Speech, religion, petition the government, assemble, and press).\n\n2. What does the 10th amendment say?\n\nI doubt most people could get one right, much less two.
1173309
Understanding the question
402445
I am not sure of the lie.. but if you have proof you didn't say it let people know.  And depending on the lie.. you have a right to say whatever you want.  Constitution says so.
477599
are you sure he wasn't quoting the preamble to the US Constitution?\n\n(We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,) establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
241762
yes it can. however it depends on the countries law policies. In some countries u have the option of challenging it before the PRESIDENT of the nation.