If a owner hires a contractor? But he doesn't tell him the danger that he is about to get into is he liable?
813993
the company is the responsible  party for not reseaching first.
320547
Highly unlikely, but also depends on city and or state landlord tenant laws where you live.  If you truly feel wronged by the situation I would address the landlord directly about the issue.  Although, in most cases the laws favor the landlord so you have to determine whether or not you really feel he was liable and negligible in the situation.
1029134
I guess that depends on your point of view. Yes, they do ask seemingly stupid questions, but most of the time, they are trying to establish that a contractor is compliant and it's ok to keep doing business with them, usually becuase it's convenient and in the government's interest. And, if you answer really stupid questions wrong, that's a warning flag to them, and might precipitate a *real* investigation. Be happy that you're getting stupid questions and not *good* ones (that you don't know the answers to, etc.).
924090
so far it sounds more like miscommunication issues and not discrimination.\n\nthe best thing to do is have a meeting with the builder to identify what you can do to make things right.  it's that simple, show initiative and do not be defensive if your craftsmanship is criticized. \n\nthere will be other projects that this builder may consider you for, if you show that you are responsible and are trust worthy.  looking for a law suit is costly and getting others in the middle of it is a sure way to get a bad reputation in the industry you are in.
264579
Their insurance would have to pay.  While it is your tree, your own insurance would not cover damage to their property nor are you responsible.  You do not have control over what happens to the tree.  The only possible exception would be if you knew the tree was a hazard (ie it was rotted badly or already falling).  The same thing applies if it is your neighbors tree.
1112290
Contact the Better Business Bureau in your area.  They should have information on the contractor.
706541
If that's what the proposal said, and that's what you signed, then it will be difficult, but not impossible, for you to prevail.  First, think about getting a copy of the proposal.  The fence company should have it. Read it.  Where is the limitation of liability clause?  Did you see it? Did they point it out to you?  Is it reasonable? (i.e. there are some things in some states that you can't waive by contract.  If the thing says that they're not liable for any damage whatsoever, it may or may not be enforceable in Florida).  Did you mention the PVC piping to them? Did they make any oral representations about the pipe (these may or may not be valid, depending upon the representations)?\nThis is an uphill legal battle for you, but what about the practical side? Call the business owner, tell him:\nHey, your guys really messed up my underground PVC piping.  I'm not happy with your work, and I would like to talk with you about having you help pay for the repairs.  \n\nExplain exactly how the fense building caused the repairs.  If possible get some proof that they didn't build the fence in a "workmanlike" way--that they were not careful somehow.  Mention that you can report these facts (never say that you'll badmouth the business itself; that can be grounds for a business libel suit) to your friends.  See if the guy will work with you.  Don't just talk to the person who answers the phone, or even the super who put up the fence--get as high up as possible.  Perhaps there is a non-legal way to settle this.\n\nIn addition, if the value is just a few thousand dollars or less, you can consider taking this to small claims court -- (the name is different in each state).  You don't need a lawyer (some states prohibit a lawyer) and the rules of evidence don't apply.  The forms are easy, and oftentimes the judge will give a "fair" verdict, rather than one that would apply a strict interpretation of the law.  Just give the facts without emotion.\n\nAs always, you can (and should) consult an attorney.  Most attorneys do not charge for their original consultation.  Call the Bar association for a referral, especially for one that does "construction defect" litigation.
341472
As a Realtor, he must disclose everything.  The liability for the agent is higher because of being his own transaction.  So, in most cases, yeah...it's probably a good thing because he/she has more to lose.\n\nStill, get an independent inspection.
29756
Oh you are opening up pandora's box!  Do  you really want tenants working on your property?  You are opening yourself up to a lot of liability issues there.  Definetly speak with a lawyer, but as a property manager I would say not a good idea!  If I let the tenants make decisions about repairs/maintenance/upkeep around here there would be mayhem!  I can't tell you how many people knock on my door daily....to ask to borrow a plunger! ugh!  Seriously though, think about your investment, you want to protect it right?  People tend to care for their own property much better than those who are merely renting!
1135730
An EPCI contract (Engineering, Procurement, Construction, and Installation) is normally used on large projects that have a srtict deadline.  The EPCI contractor takes a significant risk by fully ownig the project until they turn it over to the purchaser.  Such as an Infrastructure Project (e.g., road, rail link, bridge, water or sewage treatment plant, transmission line, even dam or hydropower plant) or similar where the Employer - who provides the finance - wishes to implement the Project on a Fixed-Price Turnkey Basis.\n\nThen the Employer wishes the Contractor to take total responsibility for the design and construction of the infra-structure facility, and the Employer wishes a higher degree of certainty that the agreed contract price and time will not be exceeded, except that if underground works in uncertain or difficult ground conditions are likely then the risk of unforeseen ground conditions should be borne by the Employer, and the Employer wishes - or is used to - the Project being organized on a strictiy two party approach, i.e. without an "Engineer" being involved, and the Employer does not wish to be involved in the day-to-day progress of the construction work, provided the end result meets the performance criteria he has specified, and the Employer is willing to pay more for the construction of his Project (than would be the case if the Conditions of Contract for Plant and Design-Build were used) in return for the Contractor bearing the extra risks associated with enhanced certainty of final price and time.
793387
Review your written agreement with him.\n\nProvide him in writing what he has not done to fulfill his end of the deal.  Be specific.  Feel free to include your concern that he would threaten a lien when his work is not complete.\n\nCommunicate in a way that if a judge has to read it you appear to be reasonable (don't hold $10,000 for $100 worth of work).  Request a reasonable date to have the work completed by.  \n\nWhen he fails with that date, give him a letter that states "This is a 72 hour notice to cure.  Failure to do so will place you in default of your contract".  \n\nPut all of your correspondence in certified mail.  Don't be surprised if he actually gets the work done in response.\n\nVery little discussion actually matters if it gets to the legal point because it can't be proven.  Get your ducks in a row in writing.  \n\nDisclaimer:  I am not an attorney, but I have dealt a little with liens and a lot with contractors.
944808
It is a lot of work, but you can hire people to do the things you don't know how to do or don't want to do.  It is much cheeper to build your own than to buy a new one.   Make sure to check backgounds of all contractors, and only hire ones who are bonded.   Have regular inspections by someone who is knowledgable to make sure the building codes are met.
503857
Only if you can prove he knew about it.\n\nHis liability is determined by your state laws, possibly some federal laws or administrative rules (EPA).\n\nCheck with a local attorney for more specific advise.\n\nAnd, you may want to take action as soon as you can because if the oil tank is leaking and contaminating other people's property, you could be liable.
959153
Hello,\n\nMy employer uses Independent Contractors to work on some of our contracts (we also refer to Independent Contractors or 1099s). When we'd like to bring someone on as an IC, I issue a formal agreement between my company and the IC which outlines the relationship of the parties and the rights that each has.\n\nDue to IRS regulations, we have to be very careful to distinguish between an employee and an independent contractor. Were you issued an agreement? If so, that should outline each parties obligations to the other. If you can provide a bit more information as to a possible predicament you may be in, I might be able to help a bit more.
480240
Well, hopefully there person you work for has liability\ninsurance......
949914
Was governance turned over to the neighborhood, or was the contractor still in charge of those matters?  Either way, you should have been presented with the covenants.  They are in place for the benefit of your neighbors, not the contractor.  If you plan on deviating from the covenants, at least be a good neighbor and talk with your neighbors about it.  If what you are planning carries any real risk that you might have to incur a significant cost for your planned deviation, then check with a lawyer to see if the covenants are even enforceable.  I know that if they are not worded correctly and handled in the proper way, they may not even be enforceable.  Even so, the good neighbor factor should weigh on your decision.
530193
Price per hour is like signing over a blank check.  Contractors can stretch jobs out for months.  It is better to have a well laid contract stating the work to be done, materials that will be used, deadline for completion, and most importantly that the contractor is insured and bonded along with his workers in case of an accident.  If you have a contractor that is not bonded or insured and they or one of their workers are injured on your property they can sue.