Vista RTM or MacOS X?
821100
Well, I think the one thing you need to consider is how you plan to use your computer.  "Different strokes for different folks" I guess you could call it.  If you're looking for the most ubiquitous operating environment, then Windows Vista it is.  Because of Windows major dominance of the desktop computing platform, you'll be in good company if you need to be able to have completely seemless interaction with other Windows users.  That isn't to say Tiger isn't seemless.  Almost all files I create in Tiger (except DMGs) can be opened in Windows without much of a hiccup.  But some files created in Windows I can't open in Tiger for the life of me.  If Windows Media files (especially the ones using DRM) are important to you, you might want to consider sticking with Windows.\n\nWindows also has the most support in terms of hardware, so if you are looking for being compatible with ANY device, you'll have a good amount of luck with Windows.  Tiger also has fairly good support as well, but I think by far Windows has it beat.\n\nIn terms of ease of use, I'd have to side on Tiger.  Aside from the unusual Dock, the software itself is very user friendly.  Software installation and removal is probably the easiest I've seen of ANY operating system (drag and drop).  Hardware installation is also very easy as well (practical plug and play).  Tiger seems to be somewhat hassle free in terms of maintaining it.  And as long as you follow proper security methodologies, you shouldn't have many problems with viruses, worms, and trojans (yes, Tiger can get them too).\n\nI use both Windows and Tiger on a daily basis and I can say that both have their place in the world.  It all really depends on what you plan to do with the computer in general.  I use Windows for Windows Media files, Outlook, and Quickbooks.  I use Tiger for writing software (Java and RealBASIC), email, surfing the Internet, watching movies, chatting, etc.
684756
hi,\nWindows is believed to be a poor imitation of Mac OS.The security that is being incorporated into Vista has been in OS X for quite a long time.The OS X has some cool secuity features .Check out this link its quite interesting.\nhttp://www.apple.com/macosx/features/security/
1016347
If your software is for the Mac then you have to go with a Macbook, if not you can get a much better machine that does not run OS X but has more ram or a better processor for the same money. For example ACER Aspire 5672WLMi or the more affordable ACER TravelMate 4202WLMi
61538
Microsoft Exchange server for the Windows side of things. As for the Mac I believe if you are trying to sync Mac & PC you are SOL.
1153915
Macs are better for art, media and creative projects.  They also aren't subject to the many viruses that PCs have to deal with.\n\nPCs are less expensive and have a wider variety of software to choose from.
414210
1)Reliability.  Macs have the lowest out of the box failure rate of all companies.\n\n2)Support.  Apple support is far superior to any support from any other company. If  I have a problem with my Mac, I go on the internet, schedule an appointment at the genius bar at the nearest Apple store, Go there and an Apple Genius fixes it right before your very eyes and if I have questions, the questions get answered.  I do not sit on the phone on hold for hours and then end up with a person who speaks English poorly at best.\n\n3) Vista ( the next release of Windows OS) has  many MAC OS X like features because OS X is clearly a better, friendlier operating system.  Oh, BTW, The next version of Mac OS will be out months before Vista, putting MS behind once again.\n\n4)Apple controls it machine configurations, the software is tested on specific hardware.  It is optimized for that hardware.  Windows has a wider variety of hardware to pick from,  and it is called Plug n Pray for a reason and that is it may not really be as easy to install as one thinks it would be.\n\nWindows might be needed because some of the companies don't write for the Mac OS, because the customer base is not as large. I have only found 1 program that I want that is Windows only and I found a suitable substitute.  Many people are concerned about gaming on the Mac, but hey, do you want a good stable reliable computer with great service or a violent game?\n\nMore and more people are buying Apples with a good reason, they are easier to use and more reliable.  You may spend a few dollars more upfront but you get what you pay for.  \n\nIn 2005 Apple won notebook of the year, desktop of the year and server of the year. I think that says it all! Oh and don't forget the iPod!
178093
OK here's the deal.\nfirstly a G5 will be better.\nThe intel based macs will have to run Adobe products in emulation which is slower.\nAdobe plans on releasing the new version of their software for  both chips, but there's no ETA on it.\nSo right now PowerMac G5 is what you want for your editing purposes.
21791
If you can wait a bit then do so, since Intel macs will be much faster. If not, then PPCs are still very good.
1018316
Mac's in general are more stable then windows that's for sure!! OS x is an excellent OS.
154294
I regret to say that you will not get there full explanation: the subject is not so simple.\nWhat do you intend to get from your computer? If - toying, mailing, browsing, XP will be enough for you. Note that last MAC operating systems are BSD-UNIX-based: they are professional OS'es. You can get with them everything you want -- but you will also learn a lot of (very interesting!) things...
693745
You can check the reviews done by Paul Thurrott. See the link below.\n\nMean while, Windows Vista, as the next OS from Microsoft, has a lot of adventages over Windows XP. It features a new look & feel, better file searching tools, very nice effects on windows (minimizing, switching or maximizing windows), new programs and games.\n\nFor both, Vista and messenger, aren't released jet, and because of that there could be some minor errors once they'll released, but they will be corrected from Microsoft as soon as posible.\n\nIf you are going to purchase Windows Vista, You must first check if your computer can run it, not all the computers are compatible with it.\n\nI dont know much about Messenger Live, but in Paul Thurrott's site is a review about it.\n\nGood luck.
805907
Get the new Apple, it can run MS and it is WAAAYYYyyy better. That's my next buy.
782145
Mac OS is better than WinXP.  The drawback with Mac is the price, it's so expensive.\n\nWindow compatible software and hardware are much cheaper and are more available on the market.  Moreover , Windows  games are so abundant.
791866
Mac User Here :)\n\nI prefer the Mac OS in general because it is more stable and more efficient.  The last thing you want is a frozen computer or re-start in the middle of a project.  \n\nPrice is comparable now (if you compare apples-to-apples); granted, they sell PCs for cheaper, but the specifications on those are also significantly less.  \n\nThe new Intel Macs can now run both Mac OS and Windows.  That is what I currently use, so IF in the design world, some of your clients or partners "must" use Windows, your Mac can boot both operating systems.  I use the Mac OS almost 90% of the time except the occasional need to boot into Windows\n\n\nRecommended hardware (minimal):\n- Mac: I would recommend at least a 2.0Ghz Core 2 Duo processor\n- PC: 3.0Ghz Intel processor or equivalent\n- As large of a hard drive as you can get (80GB miminum)\n- I would say at least 1GB of memory (RAM), and again, the more the better\n\nSoftware: Cannot beat Photoshop and the rest of Adobe's Creative Suite.  However, Adobe is planning to release CS3 in Spring 2007, and so the current CS2 may not be worth it unles you really need it.
187765
Two different operating systems, simply.  Microsoft is better in terms of easy to find software and hardware.  Mac is supposed to be slightly more reliable and efficient.
128229
I have Tiger--OS-X.4 and I love it. I have used both Mac and Windows computers and I prefer Mac. After all, there are millions of viruses out their for the PC, and only about 6 for a Mac.
731858
Macintosh and Vista are made by seperate companies so you will likely have to change a lot of the hardware and add more hardware so that Vista will be able to operate.  Your best bet would be to buy a Vista capable computer from Dell or Compaq.  That way you can be certain Vista will run.  Or if you just really want a Mac have a friend who owns a Mac to run the Vista Upgrade Advisor from the Windows website.  (Note: The upgrade advisor requires the addition of serveral packages.  The total download size is between 5.00 MB to 67.00 MB depending on your computer.  High speed connection recommended.)