Civil rights. Do I have them?
829388
Of course none of this is legal.  It happens sometimes regardless.  \n\nYour questions are very familiar.  Refuse to live in fear.
683473
equal rights in what manners?
244534
The Civil Rights Act of March 1, 1875\nThe following civil rights legislation passed in 1875 was later delcared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and represents the last Congressional effort to protect the civil rights of African-Americans for more than half a century.\nWhereas it is essential to just government we recognize the equality of all men before the law, and hold that it is the duty of government in its dealings with the people to mete out equal and exact justice to all, of whatever nativity, race, color, or persuasion, religious or political; and it being the appropriate object of legislation to enact great fundamental principles into law: Therefore,\nBe it enacted, That all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the accommodations, advantages, facilities, and privileges of inns, public conveyances on land or water, theaters, and other places of public amusement; subject only to the conditions and limitations established by law, and applicable alike to citizens of every race and color, regardless of any previous condition of servitude.\n\nSEC. 2. That any person who shall violate the foregoing section by denying to any citizen, except for reasons by law applicable to citizens of every race and color, and regardless of any previous condition of servitude, the full enjoyment of any of the accommodations, advantages, facilities, or privileges in said section enumerated, or by aiding or inciting such denial, shall, for every such offense, forfeit and pay the sum of five hundred dollars to the person aggrieved thereby, . . . and shall also, for every such offense, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not less than five hundred nor more than one thousand dollars, or shall be imprisoned not less than thirty days nor more than one year . . .\n\nSEC. 3. That the district and circuit courts of the United States shall have exclusively of the courts of the several States, cognizance of all crimes and offenses against, and violations of, the provisions of this act . . .\n\nSEC. 4. That no citizen possessing all other qualifications which are or may be prescribed by law shall be disqualified for service as grand or petit juror in any court of the United States, or of any State, on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude; and any officer or other person charged with any duty in the selection or summoning of jurors who shall exclude or fail to summon any citizen for the cause aforesaid shall, on conviction thereof, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and be fined not more than five thousand dollars.\n\n\nSEC. 5. That all cases arising under the provisions of this act ... shall be renewable by the Supreme Court of the United States, without regard to the sum in controversy ...
629617
Despite the best efforts of the civil rights administration you are still going to run into idiots like Dan! and uck_me_say. There is little you can do without proof. I know what you mean as I was once a computer analyst. I wrote an entire ATM system for a bank back in the 80's and was solely responsible for the successful implementation of the system. With these credentials and more = including published articles on my field in leading industry magazines I didn't get hired for this one bank. From the guys energy I knew he was not about to hire any person of color. \n\nI just hung in there and I got hired at some place else. Later that same moron regretted he didn't hire me when the bank that did hire acquired his bank and I became his boss. \n\nLook at it this way. God is going to take care of you and God is bigger than bigotry. Look for your opportunities as coming from God. The door is open in front of you if you just keep knocking. It is tough for people of all colors right now.\n\nPay no attention to the venom in the other answers. Hatred is its own condemnation.
373627
It depends how the egress was granted.  You must allow them, but that doesn't mean you must allow people other then them depending on how the egress was worded.  Without that it's sort of hard to determine what "rights" she was granted.
851554
Every time one of our civil liberties is taken by the government, we are hurt. As a nation, and as a free people. Our own govt is trampling on the fabric of the Constitution, and the core values that this country was founded upon.\n\nPeople ask what rights I personally have lost. The right to counsel. The right to due process. The right to privacy. The right to assemble. Habeas corpus. Unreasonable searches. Warrantless wiretapping. The list of rights and civil liberties that have been trampled on by the Bush regime grows longer every year.\n\nEvery one of those rights stipped away was mine. Just because I never needed to invoke them didn't make them less mine. And just because you haven't needed them yet doesn't make them less yours.\n\nWe only have those rights we choose to defend. Only those rights we can defend. And if we do not defend them, we lose them. Not just for those who need them now -- but for all of us.\n\n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\n\nIn honor of Pastor Martin Niemöller:\n\nFirst they came for the 6th Amendment, but I hadn't been accused of a crime, so I didn't object to denial of counsel.\n\nThen they came for the 4th Amendment, but I wasn't talking to anyone overseas, so they wouldn't be monitoring me.\n\nThen they came for the rest of the 4th Amendment, but I only called my mother, so there was nothing suspicious in my phone records.\n\nThen they came for the 1st Amendment, but I never associated with criminals, so I didn't worry about being convicted purely based on what other people might do.\n\nThen they came for the 14th Amendment, but I never really understood the rules for Due Process (and wasn't allowed an attorney), so I didn't object.\n\nThen they came for the rest of the 1st Amendment, but I never told anyone about what the government was doing, so again I remained silent.\n\nThen they came for the 5th Amendment, ...... and I no longer had the right to remain silent.
514424
Essay on The Civil Rights Movements of the 60?s\nThe Civil Rights Movements of the 60?s ... However this was the beginning of many future accomplishments.\nhttp://www.dedicatedwriters.com/paper/The_Civil_Rights_Movements_of_-120363.html
843484
Yes - they are set out in the Bill of Rights and elsewhere in the US Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, and case decisions. There are also rights set out in the various state constitutions that may be stronger than the federal alws.\n\nMany of these rights apply only to government actions. Some also apply to private actions that affect the public.
1182120
LOL\nI'm from the south and I don't even know which I belong to. You could always go or call up your community center to find out.\nGood luck.\nPeace.
938614
I'm all for equal rights. What I'm against is special rights, like quotas or giving advantages in admissions & hiring based on race. Those types of things violate the equal protection clause. Political correctness has long ago reached the point of violating the 1st amendment.
233362
You absolutely have that right. It is protected by the bill of rights -- right of assembly and free speech.
189116
You should know that you don't have any protection from discrimination right now. The Republicans promote discrimination, and are mostly racists, white supreamists "SKIN_HEAD'S". Your not going to get anywhere with that right now. You have rights and freedoms nobody will inforce for you.
780848
You need to be more spefic with your question. If you believe there has been a viloation of your civil rights under the European Convention you should seek the support of a good civil rights  lawyer. You will have to exhaust all legal channels within your home nation before going to the European court so I hope you have  alot of time and a big wallet, why not try complaing to your local MP or representative or local ombudsman if you have a valid complaint against an agency of the state.
231942
You can find information online and at your local library.  Here are some links to get you started.\n\nThe Department of Justice page on civil rights written for kids in grades 6-12:\nhttp://www.usdoj.gov/kidspage/crt/crtmenu.htm\n\nHere's the ACLU's youth page:\nhttp://www.aclu.org/freedomwire/index.html\n\nAnd of course the Wikipedia page:\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_rights\n\nYou can do a google search for "civil rights," or any specific subtopic that interests you.  You can also go to your local library and search their catalogs.  Try asking the librarian to help you find information - that's what they're their for!  Also, you can ask the teacher next door who's teaching it if he/she can recommend any books or other materials.  Don't know if you don't know him/her - he/she will be impressed that you're even asking!\n\nEdit: I just looked at your question on contracts and I think I may have been wrong to send you to the kids pages.  But I hope it helps anyway.
417783
what rights do they not have?
289870
as in we have a right to live in peace, without fear of being killed, harmed , toutured or imprisonet aginast our will, ot have our civil liberties violated .ect... who guanrantees it?\nwe do\nmy role in your right\nnoly to defend it if need be, otherwise you are free to puruse your life as you see fit
676987
Try Title TITLE VII(EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) of Civil rights act of 1964.\nat:\n\nhttp://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/laws/majorlaw/civilr19.htm