Can you solve this logic puzzle?
824158
You have to turn one light on for a while so that it'll warm up, turn it off and then turn another light on. then you can go into the room and feel the two unlit bulbs - whichever one is warm is the first one. The lit bulb is the second and the cold bulb is the third\n\n=)
480003
It's not just a question of puzzle logic, but also a question of people logic. It works like this.\n\nSince all 3 of the men raised their hand, they could all see at least one green dot. By this, they could all determine that there were at least 2 green dots. That's the puzzle logic part.\n\nFor the people logic, you have to remember that all three of the men were wise and probably came to the first conclusion immediately. However, they hesitated for a couple of seconds after their blindfolds were removed. This hesitation is important.\n\nThey all knew there were at least 2 green dots. So, if any of them could see a red dot, then he would have said immediately "I have a green dot". After all, if there must be two green dots and he (any of the wise men) could see only one, then he could easily conclude that the second green dot is on his own forehead.\n\nNone of them did that. They each saw 2 green dots which was the minimum amount that could be there according to the puzzle logic. So, they didn't know if the dot on their own forehead was green or red. Since they all hesitated, the one man who stood up concluded that the other two were having the same issue of seeing two green dots that he was. The only way that could happen was if all three dots were green.
92305
a= 34\n\na=b\n\ntherefore, b=34.\n\nunless this is a trick question.
273146
:}\nchance without cause is a logical impossibility
5316
If it were plus, instead of times, the answer would be 1.\nAs it is, I don't recognize it.  Perhaps my math is a bit rusty...
315067
You seem to have pasted some sentence fragments together.  Is it a puzzle?
357332
Is this trick question?
897370
can you complete the question please?
717483
1\nbecause u have mentioned that 1=5 so 5=1 and it cant = 9
794749
This shall work.\nhttp://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/pub0009/LPMArticle.asp?ID=305
479438
ok I looked up the riddle for this...the answer is No. Because the last question is Can you guess the riddle. Everything else is there to throw you off. So Technically the answer is no. Enjoy :)
997490
many, many discrete logic states...not just 0 or 1
759105
False... y has to be 2...\n(3,2) is a solution, but not (3,1).
884867
is this a trick question ?
225658
You may have miss-typed the riddle!\nThe question should be:\n8 _ 4 9 1 _ _ 10 3 2 0\nIf that is the case then the answer is:\n8 5 4 9 1 7 6 10 3 2 0\n\nReason: This list of numbers is in alphabetical order
1007654
Is this your homework???  The answer is B, anyway.
978758
There's a mathematical riddle that claims to "prove" 1 = 2, but if you examine it closely enough, it turns out to be dividing by 0.  Sorry I csn't remember the riddle.