So, like, I was talking to this guy, and he was all like, he SO didn't do it. So I was like, DUDE, he?
812949
In late 2002 and 2003 Grigori Perelman of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, Saint Petersburg posted 3 papers on the arXiv:[7]\n\n    * The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications, 2002\n    * Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds, 2003\n    * Finite extinction time for the solutions to the Ricci flow on certain three-manifolds, 2003\n\nIn these papers he sketched a proof of the Poincaré conjecture and a more general conjecture, Thurston's geometrization conjecture, completing the Ricci flow program outlined earlier by Richard Hamilton.\n\nFrom May to July 2006, several groups presented papers that filled in the details of Perelman's proof of the Poincaré conjecture, as follows:\n\n    * Bruce Kleiner and John Lott, Notes on Perelman's Papers (May 2006) filled in the details of Perelman's proof of the geometrization conjecture.\n    * Zhu Xiping and Cao Huaidong, A Complete Proof of the Poincaré and Geometrization Conjectures - Application of the Hamilton-Perelman theory of the Ricci flow (Asian Journal of Mathematics Volume 10, Number 2, p. 165-492 (June 2006)).\n    * John Morgan and Gang Tian Ricci Flow and the Poincaré Conjecture (July 2006) gave a detailed proof of just the Poincaré Conjecture (which is somewhat easier than the full geometrization conjecture).\n\nOn August 22, 2006, the ICM awarded Perelman the Fields Medal for his work on the conjecture, but Perelman refused the medal.[8][9][10] John Morgan spoke at the ICM on the Poincaré conjecture on August 24, 2006, declaring that "in 2003, Perelman solved the Poincaré Conjecture."[11]\n\nThe August 2006 issue of The New Yorker contains an article, titled "Manifold Destiny", on some of the issues surrounding Perelman's work.
748173
It wasn't me.\nI like his questions.
1098194
I'm having that EXACT same problem right now with a guy I'm hanging out with.\n\nAre you friends with him?  does he call you?  Do you hang out together?  Or are you wanting to know whether or not he is interested in doing these things with you?  Because there is a big difference, at least to me.
190344
have you got anything in common? Just talk some rubbish, doesn't matter what as long as it starts a conversation! but if you don't say anything you'll regret it, at least if you speak to him you stand a chance!
734969
ask him about a time when you too wasnot togther let him thing you saw him do some thing that you would not like like ask him( when your ready to tell me about it i will for give you i will be here)
815535
well u didnt say what he did , so we wouldnt know.. \nWould he do it again,, is the problem still there,, only u know,, so go with ur head, not ur heart
377942
The gentleman I met was dead on target.  He told me things about myself that I did not openly speak of at the time.  I would not necessarily call our conversation a "reading".  We were two people whose paths were simply destined to cross.  He became a very trusted confidante, a teacher, and mentor.
289310
He might have done that in a friendly way. I would not contact him about this, if he wants more I am sure he will let you know....K
588687
I'm with the guy who asked the question
382126
he wont cause from your little story he didnt ask for it
696491
Just ask because when you blew him off, he probably thought you weren't interested.  Thus, he wouldn't ask again because he doesn't want to come on a creepy guy.
348864
I would not put up with that,But i guess it depnds on how\nlond you guys have been going out,But still he should have of called you..
764896
Your so mean !!!\nOf course you still like him, and he sure as heck likes you.\nHe might be upset he never did anything and now your going around talking to other guys and potentially going to forget completely about him.
793988
I don't think he forgot, he just did not want to CALL.
895589
He was probably just nervous cause he didn't know how to react to your  having to call his direct attention to you at that moment. Like maybe he was doing a little fantasizing and got caught.
304348
I deliberately picked fights with my guy, to see how serious he was about the relationship. See, it's like this- he doesn't get mad- ever. And I had to know- if it came to a fight, would he get mean? Would he shout and scream and go psycho, or storm out? Would he hit me, or what? So, I was pretty mean to him, just to see what he'd do. I feel guilty about it, and haven't done it since.
452176
I don't.  A committed relationship means just that.  Seems like this guy isn't committed, and he lied to you about it.  Wow, what a catch...