What are the best diagonestic methods?
829193
Look at the urls\nhttp://www.DIAGNOSTICS.CC \nhttp://www.EARLY-DIAGNOSTICS.COM \nhttp://www.EARLYDIAGNOSIS.ORG \nhttp://www.EARLYDIAGNOSTICS.BIZ \nhttp://www.EARLYDIAGNOSTICS.INFO \nhttp://www.EARLYDIAGNOSTICS.ORG \nhttp://www.EARLYHIVSYMPTOM.COM \nhttp://www.HEALTHCLUBJOURNAL.COM \nhttp://www.LIVEHEALTHY.INFO \nhttp://www.URINARYTRACTINFECTIONSYMPTOM.COM
1118399
Best is ask that person
636329
I like to use GraphCalc, as it also includes live rotation of 3-D graphs. See http://www.graphcalc.com/ .
1111291
The docor is the key. the best methods are through the nipple or through the armpit. And please be realistic with the size!
762781
ask police.They knew the best methods
899180
In the direction of the velocity vector. That's the best that can be done, given the limited information you have provided.
917224
Simply use correct order of operations\n\nparentheses\nexponents\nmult/division (from left to right)\naddition/subtraction (from left to right)
920579
use synthetic  divsion method \ni think this link would help\nhttp://www.purplemath.com/modules/synthdiv.htm
132897
Try some good books.I found integration n diffrentiation the most easy ones.Solving quetions from it always used to relax me from boring linear n modern algebra.\nThere is no shortcuts to learn them but if u try hard on it u will find it the most shortcut thing in maths.\nGood Luck:)
572199
I guess my favorite is sin(x). The graph of sin(x) is pure and simple. Starting at the origin like many other famous functions, it curves up to a maximum, curves down to a negative minimum, and returns to the x-axis. This graph is reflected everywhere in nature, from wheels, pendulums, and other physics-related concepts. Also, the area enclosed by one half of a sin(x) curve and the x-axis is 2. How cool is that! Sin(x) is better than all the other trignometric functions because it is the easiest to use.
654869
to me that is the best way. you are not alone.
1170590
The methods vary in varying religions. Since your preference is not known, I refer you, with confidence, to a Parsi friend <faliengineer@sbcglobal.net> You may quote my name. With best wishes Sunamwal
290835
There are a number of methods. One way is to crash out the cadmium as an insoluble salt and than weigh that salt, to back-figure the cadmium. The problem there is that you would have interferences from many other metals.\n\nSpectrometrically, you could accomplish it using an ICP or simple atomic absorption. The later might require the use of standard addition, particularly if your matrix is complex. You figure out the absorbance after adding known amounts of cadmium.
105012
You can build all (or most of) the platonic and archimedaic solids using Origami.\n\nYou can also buid conic sections (hyperboles, parabola, ellypse and circle) by repeatedly folding a piece of paper along the tangents, point by point, using fundamental properties of each one. (= you get them as the envelope of their tangents).
379747
any of these methods:\nelectrical and electromagnetic methods,\ngravity exploration methods,\nground-penetrating radar,\nmagnetic exploration methods, \nseismic methods
857742
Any acid.  Vinegar is the best probably.
68512
Ask Dr. Math is my favorite.  You can also try Mathworld, though I usually find that I leave it more confused than when I entered.