The Let's Make a Deal problem?
825718
Using probability, you can show that it is better to switch.  It does raise your chance of winning a good prize.\n\nLet's think of this in terms of having two doors with a goat and one door with a car.  Thus, the probability that you originally picked the car is 1/3 and probability that you origianally picked a goat is 2/3.\n\nIf you picked the car (1/3 probability), then one of the two doors with a goat would be openned.  If you switch, then you get a goat automatically.  If you picked one of the goats (2/3 probability), then the other goat would be shown.  If you switch, you would win the car.  Thus, if you switch, you have a 1/3 probability of winning a goat and a 2/3 probability of winning the car.\n\nThink about if you kept your door.  The original probabilties would still hold.  1/3 probability of getting a car; 2/3 probabilty of getting a goat.\n\nWikipedia has a good discussion of this problem.  I especially like the tree diagram that is shown there.
368530
Good Question!\n\nMaybe we should get the monopolies committee to look into it :-D
958461
You made yourself a problem with section 8 when you used the ring. Also did you get any proof of the deal of the trade of the ring and its value? The problem is in a section 8 is you were dealing with a government contract. You got involved in a illegal deal with a barter without permission of the government. I would say you are both in trouble.
30975
I'm sorry, we are veeeery complex and complicated and sometimes contradict ourselves...please be patient, we would work on the problem, but there is a shoe sale...
195983
You should try to bargain and compromise with them. Show them how much u like it. Give examples of your dedication to it...if any.
442274
Can you get the rights? Usually. Will the producers have to pay? Absolutely. Is the rights price negotiable? Often but once you determine a price for one chances are they will all want the same amount. Good luck.
663477
Take her to court. If she made a verbal contract with you, then she is liable to uphold her end of the deal. \n\nYou have enough evidence for a court to agree with you, I would hope.\n\nProviding she purchased the supplies, that alone should show a preponderance of evidence that she intended for you to make her a product which she intended on purchasing.
756740
If its not working correctly take it back for your money or an exchange (Sale of Goods Act).\n\nYour contract is with the shop not the manufacturers (Donogue v Stevenson 1932).\n\nMakes me very lived that shop keeps do not know the law and they trade!
811587
what is the problem?????. , for which you want the answer
609208
hey try to think logically about the problem.. its really easy just too much words and it confuses you. so take a deep breath and then begin. take 25 % off of $375 and it will give you the answer..... im pretty sure about this but you cant trust me on those dog gone word problems, lol \ngood luck
1152140
That's part of their seller's agreement.\nHopefully, that item you're offering will bring in a much better price if a bidding war erupts between potential buyers.\nKeep you fingers crossed.
179505
thats really odd! theyve been in business a long time. I did try the # too--and got same message.\n\nid complain to federal trade commission and BBB, also stop payment or notify bank of the problem
977689
Can you post the actual problem here, so we can give you specific help?
1020903
whats the catch tho that deal
680148
The greatest mystery here is "WHAT IS THE PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED?"\n\nIf a knowledge of the 'knapsack' problem is required, please copy it here for all to ponder............
663090
I doubt it'll work out. They'll probably have future arguments about this. If one member submits to the other's requests, at least ONE of them will end up unhappy because they were "forced" into making that choice.
171130
Let's get together and make some sense.