What is the point of the nation state?  Does God want one world government ruled by Globalists and U.N. types?
822486
When did geopolitical situations have anything to do with God ?
56986
I do not, the ideal that one being ruling the entire universe is greatly flawed, not to mention the bible makes no sense. People always follow power, why not create the most-powerful being possiable and follow it?\nGod didn't create people, people created god.
978261
This sounds like 5%'r or also called Nation of Gods and Earths ideology.\n\nhttp://www.inetmgrs.com/onepeoples/nation_of_gods_and_earths_http.htm
187959
You know you are in tiled to your belief that is why are country is free for you to post such a remark. But this is the land of the free Created by GOD. The United States allows you to have this freedom and that freedom comes from Jesus Christ our savior and KING!...   In other country's the religion you abide by will kill a man for believing other things. Now is that a merciful God a loving God ? I hope you finally come to the truth and give your life over to Jesus Christ so you are spared on judgment.\n\nGod Bless you..
131415
The world will only have one government when the Kingdom of God takes over until then we will have to live with what we have.  There is no way in this lifetime!
211226
Nothing.  In America there is seperation of church and state as long as it is presumed that christianity will always be included.
1019058
The United Nations is a global government to which 191 nations belong. Your question makes no sense because there already is a "global government."
1066623
I like very much the way you started: ALL RISE!\nAnd there is no legal system which is perfect!\nMoreover, though, I do not trust "god" and this is due to the fact that god never talks to anyone, except the leaders (which gives me suspicions that the leaders claim they were told by god! - what do you think?)\nFor example, whenever someone attacks another, in the last 16 centuries, they claim that god ordered them to do that! Last, but not without importance was the Bush claim for America's and her allies to Iraq!
426887
Do you mean God is the world as a 'collective consciousness'? If this is what you mean then surely this collection of posts would just be a sample of the thoughts within this united being. And why should the one which is picked by the asker be THE word of God (the world in total)? Are not the other opinions just as valid? What if someone else asks the same question and picks a different best answer? When the best answer goes to vote, there is often not a complete 'winner',  sometimes no decision is reached at all. In that case, what would the opinion of your idea of 'GOD' be?\n\nSo no, I don't think they are the word of God, because I can't accept yourr idea of God! :)
1155295
Well there's a lot of talk about the head of one world government being You-Know-Who...Mr Uber-Antichrist...so that'd take up a fair bit of time, you know...\nThings to do today:\nPut out laundry\nQuell rebellion in Khazakstan\nFeed cat\nMake war upon the lamb and all his armies...check.\n\nSeriously, any one world government could probably only be enforced by armed control or general economic benefit. So the president would spend most of his or her time in committees, trying to get economic redevelopment packages agreed between member-nations, deploying forces to stop everyone trying to kill each other and signing more bills than can comfortably be conceived.\n\nInteresting question though.
1079293
Answering your question must keep two things in tension. On the one hand there are the commands of God to punish the wicked nations occupying the Promise Land upon Israel's entry into it back in the first six books of the Bible. Couple this with God's using neighboring nations to oppress His own people in the rest of the "historical" books in the early portion of the Bible, and one finds a God Who uses nations (righteous or unrighteous) to punish unrighteous nations as a whole. On the other hand there are Christ's commands to love one's neighbor. Although the original context referred to fellow Israelites, Jesus applied this rule to a hated half-breed nation between the northern and southern portions of His nation. He even went a step further by instructing His followers to love their enemies.\n\nSo, on the one hand one finds the Christian God commanding nations to kill nations for their immorality. On the other hand one finds the Christian God commanding love toward one's neighbors and enemies.\n\nThis dilemma has been a matter of frequent discussion throughout the history of the Christian church. What is the Christian position on every type of violence from self-defense on a personal level to world war on a global level? Should Christians advocate taking up the sword to punish evildoers, or should they advocate a pacifist position? If you haven't become familiar with Augustine's "Just War Theory" I'd recommend researching it. His position, slightly modified to fit a variety of circumstances, has become the cornerstone of subsequent Christian positions on violence and war.
898101
God does not bless any earthly nation. How could he, when the whole world is lying in the power of the wicked one, Satan the devil? Would he give his blessing to nations when they are engaged in warfare against each other, causing death and suffering, including taking the lives of innocent men, women and children? The answer is no.\nSatan is in complete control of all governments and false religion. His time is running out and he knows it. His destruction will occur soon, in God's due time. The nations and all false religion,which is under his control, will suffer the same fate. They will be put out of existance.\nThe only nation which has God's blessing is not a physical nation, but a spiritual nation and it is called spiritual Israel or the Israel of God, made up of a "little flock" of anointed ones who are awarded life as co-rulers with Jesus in his Father's heavenly government.
337662
exactly like what Julius Ceasar, Napoleon, and Hitler wanted...this isn't to say that it might not work and make the majority of people happy given a compassionate and good leader.  However, the world is too big, and some militant extremist group would start some crap.  It's not quite possible.\n\nHowever, I've read science fiction novels about the world being run by corporations in the future.  This is a very interesting idea, and seems more probable than everyone being considered one country.
1058126
I dont think any nation should be run by any religion..\nI dont think they have anything to do with each other.
442492
The reason the world is round is pretty a more than imaginary question and you could keep asking that question forever and ever without getting the right answer.God is the supreme being, the most powerful and he just created the world the way he liked.If it were you that had so much power,won't you do anything you want with anything you desire?\nLike I said there would be lots of answers to this question scientifically,geographically and mentally but the main point is that God is the all powerful.
978285
You infer correctly, and bravo for pointing this out.  People insist on it because that is what they want to believe, whether it is true or not.  They will insist that this is a "Christian" country, simply because Christianity is the main religion of the people.  In reality that doesn't mean squat to our Constitutional principles or freedoms.  If the founders wished to create a Christian nation they had the perfect opportunity to do so.  They chose instead to create a democratic republic in which religion has no say.  This fact gets conveniently ignored by fanatical Christians who think they automatically have the right to run everyone's lives.  They'll quote scripture as though it is civil law, but have little clue what the meaning of separation of church and state is at all.  Better education in our schools could help dissolve their ridiculous notion.\n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\nAce?  For every quotation from a founder supporting the role of religion in government, I can produce two from the same founder speaking against it.  This debate went on for quite some time and the founders wrote and spoke about both sides of it extensively.  The proof in the pudding is that they had a chance to install a theocracy and chose not to do so.  They chose to keep that distance between church and state in the end.  How can you even argue with that when they didn't take the opportunity to create a theocracy?
653051
Well if that bothers you then just read the prohpesies told by Kenneth Coplaland Ministries and Creflo Dollar mIniatries. Also If you want to change it you can if what you are saying is true. Look I believe in God and he has promised some go things for the future of this country. God can turn anything around if his faithful people ask him too and do what is right.