Do you believe that the CIA has sponsored terrorism?
815019
Absolutely.\n\nMost terrorism is conducted by the secret services, primarily CIA/MI6/Mossad/ISI.\nThe main culprit is CIA, who were at the root of 9/11.\nIf the secret services were closed down, the terrorism would stop, and most of the reasons for war would disappear. Enormous savings would be made, the world would be far more peaceful and happy, and no-one would be living in fear.\nThe only reason it is not done is that those who control the secret services make great profit out of their activities.
393598
yes, its the only way to get support for their fake wars & maniacal policies. it really strikes up the patriot in the gullible. proven to work over the last 3000 years.
49078
No.  He alleged that the Nicaraguan Contras were selling drugs in the United States to fund their activities in South America.  This has been pretty much proven true through numerous documents and interviews.\n\nWhat he implied in his reporting and following speeches was that the CIA knew this was going on and, since they supported the Contras, allowed it to continue unhindered by police.  The has never been proven (although most related parts of the investigation were sealed as classified documents).\n\nThe biggest claim of the CIA-Contra link came from two drug dealers.  Norwin Meneses Cantarero, who was a former Contra turned drug-lord claimed he was able to operate in the US because the CIA kept the police away.\nAnother was drug kingpin, Oscar Danilo Blandon, who during the early 1980s, was the largest supplier of cocaine in the United States.  Upon his arrest, he claimed he was getting his drugs from Nicaragua, and the CIA was helping him.  Both were seen as drug-dealers trying to salvage themselves through conspiracy theories, but their claims still remain and others have come forward to both verify and disprove their claims.\n\nBut as to the idea of your question that he proved the CIA introduced drugs into black communities to destroy them, it isn't true.  He alleged that the CIA protected drug dealers to give money to the Contras.  And Cocaine was just as destructive to white communities during the time of the alleged CIA-Iran-Contra affair as it was to black ones.
1016945
Very interesting.  \nThe CIA has always been a morally amiguous organizition which serves the government not in the interests of right and wrong but in guaranteeing US military might throughout the world.  Ex-Nazis were probably used to make connections and guarantee some flow of information.  \nI especially like that the article points out the sentiment of the war on communism took precedent over right and wrong within our government, however slanted a view that is.
324842
Terrorism is buisness. With out the governments and big buisness there would be no terrorism. It works the the favor the governments and big buisness. How does it benifit the supposed guilty parties and little people.... NO WAY WHAT SO EVER! ;) so who is responsible? I think we have heard the work FRAMED used before.
307866
Yes,\nI don't have a source but i do remember when it all hit off in Afganistan after 9/11 there were reports in the European newspapers critisising US foreign policy.\nThe CIA is known to hava assisted and trained Afgani fighters, and supplied weapons. The critisism was that they assisted them in getting rid of the russians at the time and then were not happy with the resulting government and their policy's so in they went to cause some more turmoil.\nWHY?? Cos the USSR was a big enemy then.
777069
It's an absolute outrage, and the sad truth is, this has been going on since BEFORE 9/11.  The link I've included below takes you to a paper written by the Center for Security Policy back in 2001.  In in turn references an investigative report that ran in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review back in January of 2001.  Those Investments go back to when Barbara Hafer was the State Treasurer.  This has been a known issue for almost six years, and as far as I'm concerned, Bob Casey along with everyone else who serves on the retirement fund board, should be charged with treason!\n\nThe paper below includes the entire original article, which gives the names of five companies, and how those companies are involved in aiding terrorists.
6832
Although I am 99.999% sure that they are not currently CIA agents, it would not surprise me in the slightest to learn that they had been on the payroll at one time.  But then, what is wrong with that.  Times change, enemies become allies, allies become enemies.  Russia was an ally during WWII, but then our mortal enemy right after.  I believe that during the Russian occupation of Afghanistan that Usama was heavily funded by us because he helped fight a greater enemy.  It isn't that we agreed with his policies then, it is just that he was a lesser threat than Russia was.  Same kind of situation with Iraq and Iran.  A the time, Saddam was the lesser threat than was Iran.  Remember, enemy of my enemy can sometimes be my temporary freind.
1184378
Yes, in fact the CIA, the KGB and Mossad have been working together for many years now to create stories saying that they have been doing good things for the world that are in fact bad things because they've been trying to hide the fact that they are covering up their secret agendas and in fact working undercover with double agents and reverse spies in secret cohorts with the government, tobacco companies, petrol firms, Arabian sheiks, the military complex, the Fox network, the Masons, the Illuminati, the mafia, the Elders of Zion and Russian pop group t.A.T.u. to cover up the fact that Jimmy Hoffa killed JFK by flying him into the Pentagon in order to put fluoride into the water and put the Mark of the Beast on all citizens who happen to believe in conspiracy theories.
1120651
Of course......Its called Corporate America.\nNot to mention the NSA and CIA and CPI.
648043
WOW!\n Im amazed at how many of you believe what mainstream media tells you.\n Was 911 a conspiracy? I will leave a few comments ,try a little research yourself while we still are permitted to do so in the USA.\n\n Who actually benifits from this..?\n\n!!!WAR = MONEY!!!\n\nBush Jr : Scares Americans into the Patriot Act\nBush Sr : Main supporter of the NEW World Order\nJedd Bush : Just happened to own the security co. in charge of the WTC buildings.\nF.E.M.A : now has the power of martial law.\nLarry Silverstein :By far cashed in more than anybody,On 9/11, by his own admission, Larry Silverstein ordered the demolition of his building. No jet hit this building but It did hold FBI, CIA records.\nthe Gobalists\nSupporters of the Patriot Act and a Police State\n\nThis is just a scare tactic to sucker americans into giving up more of thier freedoms in order further the adjenda of a one world governement and it's top tier members. \n\nJUST SAY NO! TO PATRIOT ACT 2 ,It may not be in your face now ,but just wait until the next government sponsered terror act (dirty bomb) they continue to desenstize you to through mainstream media(FOX)\n \nIf your really interested in preserving your freedom and understanding the full truth of 9/11 check out these sites below for the full details of exactly who was responsible.\n\nAlso you can go to google video and view many video's about this. Lookfor:\n\nLooseChange2\nMartial Law 911 rise of the police state\n\n\n<<<<<NJ Port authority>>>>>dont just respond for points here....\n\nLarry Silverstein invested $386 million in WTC 7.  On 9/11, by his own admission, Larry Silverstein ordered the demolition of his building.  In February of 2002, his company won a settlement of $861 million from "Industrial Risk Insurers".  Do the math, Silverstein and not NJ PORT AUTHORITY!!!
1103787
You're trying to say the government was behind 9-11?  Please, go back to reading Harry Potter and playing computer games.  Stay away from conspiracy theories.
558649
I have never heard of the CIA having any checks and balances on their authority.  You tell me: If no one is watching you, would you break the rules?  There is a strong possibility unethical tactics are perpetrated by the CIA, but how would we ever know for sure?
838152
This administration has been fear-mongering since 9/11, its getting pretty tired, but its the best they've got.  FOX News is the deliverer of their propaganda.  If people hear the same crap over and over, they will eventually accept it as truth.  I wouldn't believe anything you see on that network.  I've seen a complete interview of a Democratic congress member, then seen the clip they aired on Pat O'Riley's show.  They had cleverly edited it to look like he said the exact opposite of what he actually said, then Pat took the Dem's ideas and claimed them as his own.  \nAs far as being a terrorist organization, since they don't actually take part in violence, I'm not sure they qualify.
933055
No. Because none of those things are true. There is solid evidence behind the claims of those who do not agree with the government's conspiracy theory about 19 Arab hijackers.
102672
Unless you are engaging in activity that could be construed as aiding and abetting terrorism, I think you are being overly paranoid.\n\nThe government is engaging in those activities, but it has more to do with data mining. The government has a program called Tempest that is capable of monitoring electronics within the nation, but it does not do so arbitarily. Tempest runs in the background. When certain key phrases come up (for instance, "I want to kill the President"), Tempest roars to life and signals agents that someone to watch out for has been identified.\n\nThe government does not just arbitrarily say, "I think I'm gonna listen in on Sam's conversation tonight and see what pops up." That is like finding a needle in a haystack.
1168779
Let's see.. The LTTE is on record as a terrorist organization. \n\nThe LTTE extorts money from Tamil commuties in Canada and other expat communities. \n\nThe LTTE is responsible for atrocities. \n\nSo, yeah. They should be prevented from operating, fundraising, etc.