Is this a copyright infringement?
815438
It is illegal to MAKE a copy, regardless if you sell it or not.\nThe section is:\nUSC 17 106-1.\n[1]
275627
Look at the legal documents that come with the program.  Unless it's shareware or freeware then it's illegal.  You don't even "own" the program, you only own a license to use the program.  \n\nOf course it's illegal to sell those copies.
313530
They probably have a copy-protection software on it. Anyways that is illegal. That is copyright.
881160
Unless you have the proper licenses *do not* do it.\nYou might end up in *jail*.\nLook at the link below for the implications of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA).
348839
It's called Fair Use. Look here:\nhttp://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_Overview/chapter9/
471131
This is most likely a copy protection issue.
1055546
you can play bites of the song \nbut playing the whole song with out the authors permission will be a copyright violation and they could sue you if your caught \ngood luck
1186870
Obvious parody. If they don't get the hunour then they are wound too tight. Fair use says you can parody anyone's work without their permission. You aren't passing his work off as your own. What a bunch of dips**ts.
406641
If you play commericial music on your site and you are not licensed to do so, you are violating copyright.\n\nAlso, if you download music from bearshare or any other file-sharing site, from someone who is not licensed to share that music, you are violating copyright.\n\nTherefore, this thread reported to abuse for copyright concerns.
961743
I don't think it is classed as copyright but if you make a copy and send it to yourself by registered post, you have some sort of proof you owned it before making it public.  but then again, why make it public in the first place?  \nWhen the tape arrives through the postal system, DON'T open the packet!!!
362757
No. You are creating a backup copy in case the hard copy is damaged. *wink, wink* Seriously though, as long as you're not making it publicly available I don't think that would be considered copyright infringement.
617640
That is illegal.  Take that Question to Lymwire or Kaza, it doesn't belong here..  Try Buying A Copy...  You get your own code (for free) with your purchase and the person who put his blood and sweat into creating it might actually get paid a few buck for your effort
878478
Awesome and powerful  I like it.  It could be my life, and it certainly says how I feel.  Did you really write it?  If so, you shouldn't post it on here unless you already have copyright.
969830
There is some outrageously bad advice above. \n\nYou unquestionably violate the copyright of the photographer when you reprint it without authorization, regardless of the fact that it's on a web page. Further, you violate the copyright of the web page author.\n\nThe only exception to the rule is what's known under the copyright law as a fair use...  and what you've described is unlikely to qualify.
527398
It depends on the use. Under the 'fair use' copyright law it is lawful to use and display copyright material under certain circumstances. \nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use
708262
Yes you can do that if it is not copyright protected.\nE
590520
Chances are that the content is copyright by the original creator.  When this happens, they can ask you to take it off, and you must do so, or if there is significant damages, they can sue you.  If it is less than 10% of their site and is for educational purposes, then you can legally copy the info if it is not patented.