north indians(aryans)--caucasian ? what do you think?i'm having this bet with a freind of indian origin?
822745
Ya ppl in north have migrated from the north from place like afghan & even Iran....\nThey have taller, grey eyes lighter coloured skin...\nsince they have live so long here ofcourse there will be mixing of races...\nSouth has more dravidians who were native & darker skin...\nThey were chased of south so there are more of them in south...\n\nHope this answers ur queries..
521321
Economist, I REALLY like your answer.\n\nQuestion: If other cultures hanging out with whites makes them "whitewashed" does that make my blue-eyed blond granddaughter "blackwashed" because she has a beautiful  partly black daughter?
945917
Which Indians are you talking about?\n\nNative Americans or India Indians?\n\nIf you are talking about India Indians...Here's your number one source =].\n\nI've done many research projects, papers, and lectures on India--and to top all of that, I'm Indian myself.\n\nLemme no if that's what you were talking about!\n\nAlso, I'm not leaving any websites here because I don't know what you need to know about them. Try specifying what you're looking for so it's easier for people to help you..and it'd avoid people questioning your own question! Lol..\n\nAnyways, feel freee to message me from my Yahoo Answers Profile..I'll get back to you asap! =]\n\nTake care and have a nice fridayy! =]
636044
Arya is not a race. Whole rig veda uses the word only four times and just to refer a well behaved educated person.\n\nAryan race theory was a foul propoganda spread by Imperialists and evangelicans to justify their own acts. They wanted to tell indians that they are also outsiders and simultaneaouly snatching native acheivement away from them by telling it was not their own civilisatiuon but some western one who developed India.\n\nThe Aryan migration theory has got overwhelming evidence agaist it today. \n\nGharat?? it is a kind of machine. what it has to do with aryans?
412805
Are u an American-Native (Indian-American) ??? I know everybody has an immigrant background? \n\nIf you are white then you should cause ask your granpa' where he is immigrating from :)\n\nHope I can help / Thank you for using Y!Answers :) hehe.
1019492
1. As per latest research(which is true) , Harappans were not Dravidians but were a diverse set of people living in South and west Asia for a long time\n\n2. The "Indo-Aryans" were living in the Northern most part of India by 3500 BC .. The earliest parts of the Vedas date to this time (3500 BC)...however Vedas evolved to their final present form by 1500 BC\n\n( I am not bothered where they came from)\n\n3. By 2500 BC , "Indo-Aryans" spread to the plains to the east of the Harappans, Bihar, UP, MP,  Gujarat etc .....(They lived to the east of the Harappans but slowly mixed with the harappans\n\nproof:\n\na. the eastern sites have Vedic influences but in the western sites, there are not many\n\nb. After 2300 Bc the process of synthesis between Vedic people and Harappans was in an advanced stage especially in the east.\n\nc. The "Indo-Aryans" built cities to the east of the Saraswathi and co-existed with Harappans for a long time.\n\n   There were 100's of "Indo-Aryan" kings whom we need to date (They were somewhat different from Harappans but they co-existed and synthesised gradually)\n\n4. By 1900 BC the River Saraswathi dried up : there was mass migration to the east. The Harappans got sucked into the Gangetic valley along with many others (fusion of Indians complete)\n\n5. After the drying up of the Saraswathi, the western most sites got isolated from the sites of the east because   they were now separated by a desert and were culturally differnet (not synthesised)\n\n6. The culturally isolated sites i.e mohenjodaro may have been prone to any raids (doubtful???) so we can clearly tell anybody who talks about any violence ..that it was a purely internal political problem.
1097977
cute question, shows good off the wall thinking, keep asking more, some people will think your just being a smart ass but I like the question.  \nP.S.\nIs someone from Egypt that now lives in America and African-American after all Egypt is wholly a part of Africa yet many are more Caucasian in appearance?
65542
it is not true that 72% indians are aryans.They are infact admixtures of ayrans and dravidians with greater percentage of latter one.Officially 5 southern states are recognized as dravidian states and other indo-aryan.It means most of indian people are indo-aryrans not pure aryans that is why they are not light-skinned,tall or muscular
268317
As said by a great man: All men are created equal. I agree totally - we're all born naked and defenseless. From then on though, it changes - we go home to our own families.\n\nMe, I'm Caucasian. Superior race, Caucasians? No. \n\nThe superior race is a myth. \n\nDid white man do superior things once arriving on American or Australian shores? The Spanish and Portugese explorers of South America, superior perhaps? Did the Mongols prove superiority by conquering all lands from China to central Europe? Are the Chinese superior for realising that over-population is a reality that must be confronted? The Polynesians and Micronesians who traveled up to 2000 kms by kayak in the Pacific, are they superior? The aboriginals of Australia who forced animals into extinction through over hunting, would they be superior? The Ancient Egyptians for the pyramids, or the Ancient Greeks for their contribution to philosophy and mathematics, superior? \n\nPersonally, I am of the opinion that the Romans were superior (in their time). I base this on the weaponry, military tactics, aqua ducts, their acceptance of paganism, the technology, and just to surprise you all, they were the first civilization to have field hospitals on the battlefield. They also had weaponry that was superior to that which was available to Napoleon II of France (circa 18th cetury). \n\nAs for superior today? \n\nOnly the man with $ in his pocket. That is superiority now.\n\nCheers, L
647036
Well, this is cool. Best of luck to you.\nI have ancestry from all those places, but I'm clueless.\nBut, rock on, dude!
1078814
I can't tell if you mean Native American Indians, or people from India or of Indian descent, but I like them both. ;)
459964
In my humble opinion, in today's world just about everyone dates 'interracially' to one extent or another. Or maybe nobody does???  Follow me here...\n\n1500 years ago, the Englas and the Saxons were killing each other whenever they could in what is today Europe. The Englas would not bread with the Saxons because they didn’t want to 'water down' their bloodlines. Today, we do not call people Englas or Saxons, they are the Anglo-Saxons. Likewise, Scandinavians didn’t bread with the Celts and Italians wouldn’t bread with the Irish. Then why am I Italian, German, Irish and Hungarian? Because sometime ago, someone broke with tradition and mixed bloodlines. \n\nSo if I date a French or Spanish woman, then am I not mixing 'races'? So then what is the difference between me dating a Spaniard or an Asian or a Greek or an American Indian or a black woman? Skin pigmentation? A few minor differences in bone structure? Isn’t there a difference in bone structure and pigmentation between an Italian and a Irishman? I can answer that!  Yes there is! \n\nSo would you be "Interracially" dating? Yes! You would be. So what?!? \n\nThen again, regardless of the color of your skin or the structure of your cheekbones, we are ALL A PART of the humane race. So then, no! it's not interracial. \n\nI guess it all depends on how you see others. Me, I believe ALL people are a part of the humane race. So 'Interracial' dating would be impossible... Unless you are dating a guy from another species, and I sure hope that is NOT the case. lol.\n\nI hope this helps.
817436
actually caucasian and chinese are belong to one family, all the caucasian are of chinese origin,
748102
"Natives" of this country refer to themselves as OP's (original people). This country wasn't named America by them. They are labeled by their being here first. As far as the descriptions that you gave you used Asian as an ethnic description but used a color as a description for African American. Why? Also the Op's have different genetic makeups just like every other ethnic group. I know African Americans who have slanted eyes and they are not mixed race. The darker skinned Natives are obviously from the hotter regions just like darker skinned caucasians and African Americans and any other race who live there. The colder the climate year round the paler the skin tone.
845608
I'd guess slightly tanned skin, high cheekbones and the hair could go either way. Really, it all depends on whose genes are more dominant.  I'm very much Cherokee Indian but you'd never in a million years guess it by looking at me.  All you can see is Irish.  My personal opinion though is that it would be one BEAUTIFUL baby!!!!
852077
I am a white man, US born, and grew up in the deep south.  That being said, I am of Welsh, Irish and German ancestry.  While some may consider that to be racially pure, I have never considered it.  My wife is 1/8 Cherokee, yet my son is Blond with blue eyes.  Who really cares?  What difference does it make?\nAs long as we dwell on matters such as this, we cannot move beyond them.
976428
There are Mongoloid Asians (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Filipino, etc.) and there are Caucasoid Asians (Persians, Arabs, Indians, etc.). Skin color has absolutely nothing to do with race. The term "white" is not meant to be taken literally. Race is more about skull size and bone structure. By definition, Caucasian ("white") people are those whose ancestry originated in not only Europe but North Africa, the Middle East, South Asia as well as much of Central Asia.