do you think we should stop animal test and use child killers and phedophiles instead?
819616
Great idea, wish I'd thought of it.
1173330
Yes, it'd be better if children were prevented from such events, because they may not truly understand the implications of sex, and fetishes, etc.\nst
688523
We should condemn the politicians, media and lobbyists who are creating the uncalled for hysteria towards rehabilitated former sex offenders. \n\nThe FACT is that rehabilitated former sex offenders have the lowest recidivism rate, with the exception of murderers. Your child has a much higher chance of being harmed by a drug dealer/user, drunk driver, gang activities, drowning, playground accident, sexual abuse by someone known to the family and parental neglect. As a matter of fact, there is a 90 to 95% chance that someone known to the child will commit an offense instead of the register sex offenders. Yes, there are some horrific cases, but they are few and far between the actual truth. If you would look on the FBI website you would see that many more children each year are killed by parents, drowning, drunk drivers, etc. than they are by registered sex offenders.\n\nRather than have this Country cause all this hysteria, spend needless tax dollars on a registry and the new laws that will do nothing to prevent child abuse, we need to learn how to prevent sexual abuse, we need education on the issue and we need sensibility. These laws were originally created for the Sexually Violent Predator and only for law enforcement use. We need to go BACK to the original intent. The registries are so watered down now with completely non dangerous persons the truly dangerous can get lost in the crowd.\n\nBy the way, I have no fear on this issue. I speak out all the time. I work with rehabilitated former sex offenders everyday.
859476
I agree that foxes are a pest for most country folk.  However, I do think that it is disgusting to allow dogs to tear a living animal to pieces.  I also don't agree with hunts and packs of hounds following foxes across farm land and private property as it does damage.  Yes I know it shouldn't happen, but in reality it does.  I live in Derbyshire and have seen happen it many times.\n\nGassing underground is an option but it's not just foxes that will be killed.\n\nShooting to kill is acceptable to me (just my opinion) but as you stated, this can result in wounding and a painful death.\n\nSnares are barbaric and should be outlawed.  Full stop.\n\nAs far as culling is concerned, it should be done in a way that's as humane as possible but to be honest I don't know what the answer is.  That's probably why this debate rages on.
329206
I believe each human should be thoroughly evaluated and determined as to what kind of reform methods are possible.\n\nTake into consideration from what kind of environment they were raised in.\n\nYou never really know why someone has killed someone else. It could have been out of their own fear of retaliation, or mental distress.  "Threat elimination" is a thing that drives alot of people to murder.  Also, the person may have been under the influence of hard drugs or alcohol, and did something they wouldn't have done, normally (sober).\n\nFrom my own point-of-view, I believe most male aggression is caused from sexuality (hormones), so I'd vote for castration of murderers, rapists, child molesters, etc., instead of death penalty.  BTK is a perfect example of a guy who should have been castrated straightaway.\n\nIf we did "Eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth", then the whole world would be blind and toothless...
759974
Without a question I would ban it.  We are trying to save our earth and its people not kill them.
838161
Yes we are vegetarians we totally agree with you!!!!!!!!!\nAt least we know some people care about animals!!!!!!!!  Not  Only for the animals sake but people are so unaware of all of these chemicals and steroids that they are putting into these animals to make them bigger quicker to get money now. We have no idea what all of these chemicals,etc...are going to do to our children as they grow in the future.  By  the way please don't turn  a blind  eye to how animals are being tortured for their body parts while they are still alive.  God did not put these creatures here for us to mistreat just because we are more intelligent.  Maybe we should start taking I.Q. Tests and just clean out  the world of the less intelligent ones.
850293
I use to hate hunters and then when I stopped and thought about it I realized that I respected hunters more because they kill their own food and it's much more humane then a slaughter house. When I was in school I had to do a project about animals and it became about animal rights and the things on PETA and other animal rights website had me horrified. For a while I tried being a vegetarian but it was hard when my family would belittle me over it. I still eat meat now but not nearly as much. If possible I try and buy items that don't test on animals. Out of everything I think animal testing was the most horrific. Especially since it's not 100% accurate scientific wise since animals and humans react different to medicines and products. Aspirin can kill a cat, you can give a low amount to a dog, it helps a human, and does nothing for a horse. \nI really hope animal laws improve. Just being more humane would be a really great start!
841195
For years a debate has ensued over the practice of animal research and experimentation. The scientific community and animal rights activists have disagreed as to whether the benefits of animal research and experimentation are worth the pain and suffering that these experiments often cause to the animal subjects. Scientific advances have greatly reduced the number and severity of animal experiments that take place\n\nThere are  two main categories of animal experimentation and research, medical and cosmetic. \n\nMedical testing involves testing new drugs for their levels of toxicity and trying out new medical procedures. Animals are used to represent humans and human reactions in these tests in order to analyze the potential impacts of the drugs or procedures on humans\n\nCosmetic testing is use of  animals to test the risks involved with the use of certain cosmetics and household products. This type of experimentation predicts the irritation levels of these products and any dangers they may pose to humans\n\nWITHOUT ANIMAL RESEARCH:\n*60 MILLION PEOPLE MAY RISK DEATH FROM HEART ATTACK, STROKE, OR KIDNEY FAILURE FROM LACK OF MEDICATION TO CONTROL THEIR HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE.\n*7,5000 NEWBORNS WHO CONTRACT JAUNDICE EACH YEAR WOULD DEVELOP CEREBRAL PALSY, NOW PREVENTABLE THROUGH PHOTO THERAPY. \n*POLIO WOULD KILL OR CRIPPLE THOUSANDS OF UNVACCINATED CHILDREN AND ADULTS THIS YEAR.\n*MILLIONS OF DOGS, CATS, AND OTHER PEYS AND FARM ANIMALS WOULD DIE FROM ANTHRAX, DISTEMPER, CANINE PARVOVIRUS, FELINE LEUKEMIA, RABIES AND MORE THAN 200 OTHER DISEASES NOW PREVENTABLE THANKS TO ANIMAL RESEACH.
244150
Protecting your offspring is a very strong natural urge. Could I kill to protect my daughters? Yes, Probably before I could kill to save my own life.\n\nElizabeth, I agree with you about the perverts. I never could understand how many pedophiles actually make it to trial. If it was my child I'd hunt them down and they should pray the cops find them first because I would not let them have a quick and easy death!!
311637
Easy, just ban the English or lock them up in some zoo. Don't think the other animals will be best pleased, though!
835343
We don't even need to give examples of animals but of the freaking millions of street children that are raped, beaten and on drugs everyday. I'd like to see these extremists go all around the world and shelter every single one of them. If they can't, they ought to shut up.
1127636
It would be easier to count the percentage of women who did so rather than the total number of infants murdered.  Either number's gonna be high, so be sure you know you're  arithmetic.
333671
i think is wrong because God create animals not for us to use it for animal testing.
709254
i think that people who abuse children should be castrated but of course that is against their human rights but i think that it is against human rights to abuse a child. i think the same applies to all crimes and criminals. if you violate someone else's human rights than so should yours. people wouldnt be scared of this if they havent done anything wrong
684215
I don't think we should have child molesters walking amongst us...they should have been put to death.
865425
I think they offer the perfect solution to one of society's more pressing moral problems.\n\nHuntingdon Life Sciences and its associated companies are constantly under attack for their use of animals in scientific research. Obviously, the experiments conducted on the animals, while essential to medical and scientific research, are often painful and result in the death of the animal. Another problem is that, while guinea pigs, chimpanzees or dogs share certain physical and biochemical similarities with humans, they aren't exactly the same.\n\nStreet beggars fill the gap admirably. Physically and biochemically they are identical to human beings, without actually being human. There are plenty of them and there is absolutely no reason to care about what happens to them. If we finish experimenting with one and dispose of it afterwards, we can just go and get another one. There are plenty to go around.\n\nThough it's of no concern, this also gives their life some purpose, in that they will save a chimpanzee or a rat from having to suffer. This is certainly of far, far greater value to society than their current role.