Well, just for the people Bush lovers, would u dislike him if one of your people is in the war getting kill?
829280
What is "my people"??  \n\nI'm a Bush supporter.  I don't think he's perfect by any means.  I think he's done alot wrong and I think he could make better choices.  However, I still support him and believe in what he does.  \n\nAs far as sending a loved one to Iraq, I've seen my husband deploy there 3 times in his career.  It's what his job is and I know that.  There is no greater honor than being married to a soldier or member of the military.  We can never forget what their duty is.  We can never forget, they protect people like YOU from terrorists in Iraq and elsewhere.\n\nWould I dislike Bush if my husband died??  Hell no!!  It's his job and his duty.  I fully support him and his career.  I would be honored to be married to a soldier who lost his life for his country.  Do I want it to happen??  Of course not.  I still support Bush, the action in Iraq and my husband.\n\nWhat are you and "your people" doing to ensure freedom??
242471
I'm not George Bush fan, but thanks nonetheless for this question.   Hopefully, some of those who are blinded by their hatred will learn to "simmah down" a little.  To be credible with criticism, you've got to maintain perspective.  I see some have already succombed to temptation, and demonstrated that they can't operate within the constraints of the question . . . sad really.\n\nMuch as I find to dislike about him, I also do find some good things.  He is willing to stick to his principles, even when he fully knows it is politically unpopular.  He has tried (unsuccessfully) to change the poisonous atmosphere in D.C.   He has complimented Clinton, minimized the attention placed on the Clinton destruction and plundering of the White House when they left, made real outreach to include Kennedy, Hillary, and other opponents.  All of which has been reciprocated by nastiness.   As you point out, he is a stellar role model for fitness.  And if you admire his wife Laura, as I do, you have to consider that she chose him for her husband: a pretty powerful endorsement.
1049509
Do you have a particular reason for asking this?  Osama Bin Laden is a terrorist and Bush is a President.  It is a difficult question as disliking one does not include liking the other.  I dislike Osama for many reasons much more serious that the ones I have for disliking President Bush. Likewise, I have some sense of patriotism that nudges me to help support our president from a national point-of-view when I think it appropriate.  While, at the same time, I have nothing but ill-will towards Al Quaida and other groups that take the beautiful religion of Islam and slander it to create hate around the world.
1124657
wrong as wrong can be, every death that has happened over there since the day of our invasion, has to blamed on bush.  he should be tried as a war crimminal in iraq.
1056052
It,s Amazing How One Can Knock President Bush When John Howard And President Bush A Good Mates! John Howard Was Just In The States With President Bush. Right Or Wrong ,\nAll That Is In The War Are Sticking Together! \nLook in your own backyard before knocking others.\nIf you had a child SERVING  in the war,,,\nWOULD YOU BE SO NEGATIVE ?\n~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~ Peace.
1039616
Nope -- terrorists hate us whether we are Republican or Demorcrat or nothing.  They hate that we are free and have the freedom to speak out and worship how we choose.  I'd rather have a president who is willing to take the offensive  than somone who tries to hug the terrorists and have a bomb tossed in our pocket while doing it.
1120731
Any nation of people who sit back and let George W Bush (modern Hitler) 'control' their country are f*cking thicker than pig shit. I feel 4 the iraqi people, there is NO f*cking excuse 4 them yanky b*stards to bully there way around iraq. Thank the lord (if there is 1) most yanks hate GW BUSH.
597440
it depends on the person....we're not all the same you know, which is a very common mistake that many foreigners make with americans, but me personally, i wouldn't want war unless mayb they actually attacked us
1043671
Okay... You could pick five random answers I've given and figure out just how much love I haven't lost for Bush... but god damn! You agenda people are getting on my last nerve. Did you miss the subtle bus or something? Woohoo... we get it... you don't like the war. Hey, here's an idea! How about asking a pointed question that gets only opinionated responces, dividing your answers into two easily definable groups. Then lets add lots of exclimation points, because that makes everything better!!!!
321555
I have noticed that the Bush admin. is in a corner or someone disagrees with them, they tend to degenerate into name calling and question that person's patriotism and attempt to attack them personally  that is a tactic the Nazis employed when they came into power by suggesting that anyone that opposed them was either a traitor or would be exposed as being immoral in some way, its a good way to avoid the real issue and make people afraid to speak out
97824
Hell yeah.  I would have shot him in a heartbeat.  Ok...that wasn't the "politically correct" answer to give, but after being there, my bro-in-law is currently in Fallujah, and my hubby leaving in 2 weeks for his 2nd tour....I know how the insurgents will very easliy destroy themselves...ESPECIALLY if it means taking out 1 or more of our great soldiers.  I would much rather have one more dead insurgent(not IRAQI) than suffer more casualties of our troops.
229539
Are you saying that it should be ok to call him Bush sometimes since we talk about him so much?  If so, I agree.  If not, my bad.
863902
I don't hate him. I think him and his administration have done tremendous damage to this country, but I don't hate him as a person.\n\nHate implies emotion. I do my best to not allow emotion to cloud my judgement when it comes to such things. People should vote based on logical reasoning, as opposed to emotional bias.\n\nYou have asked a difficult question. Which of the many errors and aberrations is the one that "takes the cake".\n\nI would have to say Iraq and the policy of the pre-emptive strike. With Afghanistan, there was at least some logical justification for attacking them. But with Iraq, there was none. Absolutely none. Really. \n\nThere were never WMD's. It's hard to have a secret weapons program when you can't even keep the lights on. There were also no connections to terrorist groups. Saddam believed such extremists represented a threat to his power (as most dictators do).\n\nThe bi-partisan congressional report stated these facts. So that brings us to the last reason: Removing a dictator.\n\nWell, the problem with removing an iron-fisted dictator in a region known for sectarian violence and instability is that there is a high probability that such violence and instability would resume. Bush Senior was smart enough to listen to his advisors on this (and remembered what happened to Soviets in Afghanistan in the '80's). They realized that going all the way in and removing Saddam from power would create a lot more problems than it would solve and cost serious money. Even news analysts at the time stated that removing Saddam from power would end up being a serious problem.\n\nBush Jr., however, did not listen to the lessons of the past. He also seemed to disregard the advice of recent advisors.\n\nIf you're not going to learn from the past, or listen to your advisors, then you'd better have a damn good plan. If you disregard the fact that the war was an incredible mistake, the military planning was only OK. If we had been fighting even a somewhat comparable foe our forces would have gotten smacked (review the war strategy to see why). But since we were fighting a massively inferior force we won militarily.\n\nOf course, military victory is only half the battle. Afterwards, you have to win the peace, the hearts and minds of the people. This is perhaps where the biggest mistakes were made. Looking at it objectively, it would appear either some large assumptions about the Iraqi people were made or the Iraqi socio-cultural history was ignored. In any event, the administration's plan was broken and has led us to what we see today.\n\nYou can try and blame insurgents/terrorists, but that doesn't make logical sense. The insurgents and terrorists weren't there before the invasion, and only a fool would think that they wouldn't quickly move in to try to fill the power vaccuum left by Saddam. \n\nYou can also try to blame the democrats, but the republicans had control of the house, senate, and presidency. Besides, the democrats contributed to this problem as well. Don't let the spin fool you, both sides share the blame on this.\n\nAnd to really rub the salt into the wounds, the massive expenditure of the war plus the tax cuts (if your're going to have a war, at least have tax money to run it) has caused us to borrow even more money from foriegn countries to pay for it. Not what I would call fiscally responsible. In order to pay off the national debt, every man, woman, and child in the US would need to pay $17,000.\n\nNow we're mired in a war that had no legitimacy, has no exit strategy, was against the will of the world (UN refused to back it with such shoddy evidence), the country seems to be well on its way to a civil war (which was warned), we've spent over $500 billion (also warned), and so far the only thing we have to show for it is hanging a former dictator and thousands of dead bodies, both soldiers (theirs and ours) and civilians.\n\nFrom a lo
5662
Heck no! The only thing the war is strengthening is The Evil Party's pockets! As for weakening.............I don't like Bush very much AT ALL!!!! so I won't say what I WANT TO!
1176609
well yes and no. I do not like president bush but i want our Country to look strong in the war and win over the mean terriorists.
911015
sometimes we do but I do not agree with it. I saw the statment brother aziz made and I really feel a bit upset about this topic. \n\nHe asked if God told bush to start this war? If God was wrong?\n\nGod did not tell George Bush anything. I just feel bad for all our troops overseas and all our Good men and women who have died. As well as for the all innocent lives that have been taken in Irak and elsewhere.\n\nIt is a sad thing indeed and I really do not even want to talk about it, I DO NOT LIKE POLITICS. We all have friends and family in the military and overseas and is just sad to see what is going on. It just makes no sense to me.\n\nI do appreciate the MEN AND WOMEN OF THE U.S MILITARY FORCE and I am sad that many have died in the line of duty and left widows and children!\n\nI pray for all our man and women in the military as well as for all of us Americans and all our brothers and sisters muslims and non-muslims. Inshallah there is world peace and we do not go through the situation we are in now.\n\nGOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! AND GOD BLESS ALL OF US! AMEEN!
1020491
Yes, y not?  Bush is trying to rid a country of murderous assholes.  Hes doing the right thing.  and all the people that say the war is bad and all that, just talk to someone in the military that has been over there.  they will all tell you how proud they were to be over there, to see the faces of the people they have helped and to have so many people coming up to them and thanking them, so just shut up about the war.