Did Adam and Eve have navels?
819342
no navels are a high bred, they had Valencias.
178454
A fun question, but there is no way to know the answer, nor does the answer ultimately matter.  \n\nNevertheless, I'll admit it would be a fun after-dinner conversation starter. <grin>  \n\nPerhaps the better question, if you assume that they DID have belly buttons, is this -- would Adam have collected lint in his belly button prior to taking a bite from the apple or would he only have collected lint after taking the bite?
105079
Below I've got the definition and history for the word navel, as in bellybutton. Have you ever seen a navel orange? It's got a bellybutton-looking spot on it, hence the name. Here's a picture of one: http://www.flowersdirect.co.il/var/103/2156-tb-pic_navel.jpg\n\nMain Entry: na·vel \nPronunciation: 'nA-v&l\nFunction: noun\nEtymology: Middle English, from Old English nafela; akin to Old High German nabalo navel, Latin umbilicus, Greek omphalos\n1 : a depression in the middle of the abdomen that marks the point of former attachment of the umbilical cord or yolk stalk\n2 : the central point \n\nOkay, and here's the def and history for the word naval, as in ships. As you can see, even though it sounds like navel, it comes from a completely different root. \n\nMain Entry: na·val \nPronunciation: 'nA-v&l\nFunction: adjective\nEtymology: Middle English, from Latin navalis, from navis ship\n1 obsolete : of or relating to ships or shipping\n2 a : of or relating to a navy b : consisting of or involving warships
55214
This one cracks me up.  Hmm.. what came first, the chicken or the egg.  I say the chicken.. Adam and Eve were never babies so the chicken had to come first and since they were never inside a womb.. no, I don't believe they did have belly buttons.
606749
Adam was created out of the dust from the ground.  God breathed life into him, and he lived.  But then Adam was alone, and God knew that Adam needed a companion - someone that was just like him, just for him.  So God created Eve out of his rib, to symbolize that man & woman are linked together.  Read the chapter Genesis 2 in a Bible, and it says all this.
272695
i think, i mean if you think about it, Adam and Eve were the forst humans, and if they had babys, the there babys had babies, and so on, so you would think, but im not positive.
58548
Your stomach, although they're not directly connected (they once were)\n\nThe navel is where the umbilical cord connected you to your mother before you were born. \n\nOf course, after birth the openings close up.
1174814
Good question.......I asked how did Adam and Eve have two sons and carry on the human race. Was it incest? i have no idea.\n\nWe have this idea that Adam and Eve were white (seen in pictures) but who really knows what race they were or if they truly existed. I was told that the bible is theory and it is symbolic not to be  taken literal. So take it for the "story" book it is.
1106224
Adam and Eve had more children. Cain married his sister. The story of Cain and Abel was centered upon them and not the whole family. It is believed that Adam and Eve had many children who intermarried. Kinda gross to think that we all came from inbreeding.
1116070
We were born.\nAdam was created. I don't believe he had a belly button.
1157544
If Eve didn't eat the fruit, Adam would have done it eventually anyway. \n\nBut suppose neither of them did. Humanity would still live in Eden, and be free of self-consciousness, shame, and sin. In that case, the need for Christ on Earth would have never existed, thus eliminating the development of the Christian religion.
127203
Adam and eve were created nude.\nIt is the lust with evil eyes which forced human beings to seek covers in various ways.
1051293
"No - Adam didn't. Neither did Eve."\n\nWhy? Because your belly-button (navel), or tummy-button as it's sometimes called, is a sign that you were once attached to your mother. You depended on that life-line - the umbilical cord - for your nourishment from her body as you developed inside her.\n\nBut our first parents, Adam and Eve, didn't develop that way. I believe that God would not have planted on them a false indication that they had developed in a mother's womb.\n\nWhen God created Adam and Eve in mature form, the day they were created they might have appeared to be, say, 30 years old. But God wouldn't want or need to create the appearance of a false history, any more than the mature trees created by God would have had growth rings initially. Those are things which would develop in their offspring as a result of processes later on.
1114789
Yes. The belly button, or umbilicus is a scar on the abdomen, caused when the umbilical cord is removed from a newborn baby. All placental mammals have a navel. While it is fairly conspicuous in humans, in most mammals it appears only as a thin hairless line.
56610
Well you see, as yet, no one has ever been able to find any real historical proof of the existance of this couple.  Sure, there have been all kinds of interpretations of various discoveries, that this or that "must mean" something else.\n\nBut this is a great question, as it simply points out a fact:  Genetically, how did one couple spawn so many different races?\n\nThere was an earlier question on this subject, where it was pointed out that even in the bible there are references to the existance of others, outside Eden, with whom those cast out must have mated.\n\nAt any rate, there must be other factors involved.\n\nThis being the case, then Adam and Eve can be supposed to have whatever genetic and racial characteristics you want to assign.  Who could proove otherwise?
695410
Probably the "God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve" one.  This argument totally overlooks the fact that God created hermaphrodites.  And anyone who believes that God creates humans, will have to agree that God created hermaphrodites, because they were born that way.  So obviously the Adam and Eve story does not cover all the people that God created.
1090219
Nope. Adam was never a baby, thus, no bellybuton.