what is vice versa when we are using in the sentence.?
818819
vice versa means the other way round.\nfor example, if it is australia vs. west indies then u say australia will beat west indies or vice versa. that means either australia will beat WI or WI will beat australia. did u get it?
125272
I would have put this under Words and Wordplay, but here is fine.\n\nAs for the question, it really is a question of situation. Contract the two that you don't want emphasis on.
648431
The only way ı can find any logic in this sentence is if the comma before 'for example' is changed to a semi-colon. Then it's two different sentences and, even if I don't like it, I can parse it.\n\nSo, if that's the case, then it's 'situation', not 'patterns'. Patterns are an aspect of a leaf's form and physiology. You can reword this sentence like this: Leaves develop in different situations; according to these situations, the form and physiology vary.\n\nThis is logical when you look at the example, because 'different degrees of light' are different situations (as someone else said, 'environment' would be more suitable), and the example says that 'different degrees of light' affect how the leaf adapts (preumably altering its shape).\n\nHope this helps. Swat your teacher upside the head for giving you such an ill-formed question!
811980
Your sentence is good as it is.  The only word I would question is "also".  (I'm guilty of over-using it also!!)  I would remove it if it isn't necessary to the meaning of the sentence.  Best of luck.
778765
It depends on which is the "subject", and which is the "predicate". "With" would presume association, whilst "By" would suggest Participation.
662941
None because:\n\n1.) There are robots all around making our lives easier.\n(took out comma)\n\n2.) There are robots all around, which make our lives easier.\n(added comma)\n*Note: This seems to be incorrect, so I will say that the answer MAY be #2, depending on how you were taught English.\n\n3.) There are robots all around; they make our lives easier.\n(changed comma into semicolon)
261796
Compound sentences use words like..(but and ). Those are words that join sentences or help add more. You do not change the sentence you simply join them together....\n\nThe rabbit jumped into the bushes and the dog followed it.
930918
Can you use it in a sentence?
818276
After this sentence, start a sentence with "Moreover,"\n\nThat should do the trick!\n\nHope that helps!
575719
Your statement and grammar awnsers that question
45967
D) Other. Try this:\n\nThough 'two', 'too' and 'to' share the same pronunciation, each spelling carries a different meaning.\n\nJust an idea.
190443
what do you mean by which of the above? you silly person, dont copy what teacher wrote on the board - annotate the question silly!
432603
Can you rephrase the question?  I am not sure I understand what you are asking.
68646
Perhaps "with" is supposed to read as "which"?
538319
A -> B\nB -> C\n...\nT -> U\nYou (U) -> V\nV -> W\n\nSo, You -> V
691650
No, they are not the same. The first one is grammatically incorrect & should not be used. The second is grammatically correct & is used in the context of the comparison e.g "Isn't there the same problem in the English government as in the American government, in regards to international trade?"
886524
Your question is very vague. There is not even a verb in it. And "whether", demands an alternative. Like, whether..... or.....\n\nPlease rephrase your question as a complete sentence.