should Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft, and Condie testify under oath for a REAL 9/11 investigation?
815015
What difference would it make? We all heard and saw what happened at the Clinton trial...
975341
Hell yeah!  We need a probe into 9/11 that Bush is scared of releasing!  Just think about how many lies we've been force fed by this bastard administration!!!  It's going to be great to know why so many Americans have died because of this ahole!
893636
Bad at best, and unconstitutional at worst.  I assume you are talking US.\n\nBush and Cheney should be impeached, and Rumsfeld, Gonzales and Ashcroft should be tried at the Hauge for war crimes.
1023032
Why? Because a high ranking FBI official AND Donald Rumsfeld were also guilty of stealing artifacts from the WTC and Pentagon crash sites.\n\nNow you don't want to press a case against Rumsfeld, do you? What is rockandroll's problem? Can't stand the truth?
994903
They should release all 84 confiscated videos as well as rescind all 2500 or so gag orders that have been placed on witnesses, either through direct threat or as part of their victim compensation packages.\n\nWhy can't some witnesses talk about what they saw and others can?  Why can't they just show one of the 84 videos where an actual plane hits the Pentagon to shut up the conspiracy folks?
1115200
You cannot take dead men to trial. Plenty of others have been tried and taken in for other terrorist threats, but their was no conclusive evidence that linked them to  911. The rest of the men that we know for sure were involved, are dead.
417410
the question should be - who should be retaliated against.\n\nno black boxes found, no in depth public investigation of each plane, no plane found in the pentagon, etc. etc. etc.  \n\nhmmm.  certainly the work of muslims (or not)......\n\nwe all knew it was bs from the word go
268910
I think it is very eye opening when you think of all that happened on 9/11 they still had more planned.  With all we had on him and having him ahead of the attacks of 9/11 and not being able to open him up about the attacks in advance show the resolve of the terrorist's against us.  He may be lying, however at this point what does he have to lie about.  With all he has admitted to he is bound to get the death penalty, which is possibly what he wants.  His testimony goes a long way to refute all those who believe 9/11 was just our government's conspiracy.  Why would another terrorist admitt to involvement in the planning of the attacks if they were indeed our government's conspiracy.  It is after all our government that the terrorist's have set out to discredit.
1084548
Why should anyone "flame" you for questioning such a major issue that has affected the lives of so many. It takes a lot of courage to question things and to seek the truth.\n\nThere are many websites that question the 9/11 official story.  \n\nThe controlled demolition of the twin towers by Thermate which is the controlled demolition explosive thermite plus sulfur. Sulfur cases the thermite to burn hotter, cutting steel quickly and leaving trails of yellow colored residue. \n\nQuestions that need answers as to why President Bush continued to calmly read goat stories at the school when he had just been informed that a plane hit the first tower.\n\nYou may want to check out these sites, best of luck and God bless you: \nwww.whatreallyhappened.com\nwww.informationclearinghouse.info\nwww.rense.com\nwww.reopen911.org\nwww.wanttoknow.info\nwww.ny911truth.org\nwww.mikehersh.com\nwww.prisonplanet.com\nwww.911review.com\nwww.septembereleventh.org
352459
It might be withholding some information on the grounds of national security of for legal reasons but in the main the events of that day are so well documented that it would be difficult to withold any of the salient facts.\n\nThere are conspiracy theories that 9/11 was orchestrated by the FBI and other US agencies but as with all conspiracy theories, they don't stand up to even the most basic of examinations and are based on ignorance not fact.
822976
I believe he sincerely thought he was doing right. The first suspect after 9/11 was Iraq's dictator after Operation Desert Storm and sanctions. He was our greatest enemy at the time. Now, we have only made new enemies and one of our oldest, much more influential and powerful. He was basing his decisions on the information presented to him, after all, he was not the one performing actual investigations and research. I truly believe he is a good-hearted person who was mostly mislead by advisors.
1010115
Where in the constitution does it state that we as citizens should not question our government when they are waging war in our name. Show me the chapter and verse, show me the amendment. If we are at war with the men who attacked us on 9/11 why haven't we found that 6' 5" terrorist carrying a dialysis machine through Pakistan?\n\nWe have opened up a new front on terrorism in Iraq. We are creating terrorists every day. The orphans in Iraq will come after us when they are of age. Believe it.\n\nThe NYT is not printing battlefield locations but reporting on a program that the President bragged about in his speeches. You want abuse of reporting? Check out Dick Cheney quoting the aluminum tube myth he helped fabricate with Libby and Miller below.\n\nThe "liberal media" shtick is getting old. If everything is going well in Iraq, go plan your next vacation there. Or sign up for military service.
1128650
The "OBL and the 7 dwarfs" theory is probably the least plausible conspiracy case for the 9/11 attacks.  Unfortunately, it is the only one that has been investigated in "back-assward fashion".\n\nNormally, in a real investigation, you look at motive, opportunity, and resources.  You investigate and gather the facts on those things, and then you build a case that fits the facts.  You don't start with an instant conclusion and then work backwards to change or cherry-pick facts to fit your conclusion.  In science they call this "pathological science", where a mad scientist comes up with a wierd theory and then proves it with narrow examples...and facts contradicting this theory are summarily tossed out, changed outright, or ridiculed.  In law, this kind of theorizing leads to "kangaroo courts", where the "burden of proof" is on the defendent and not the prosecution.\n\nThe real video evidence, science, 1st-hand witness statements, and paper-trails all contradict the official conspiracy theory.  Will we ever get a confession of those that pulled the strings?  Of course not, but it is enough for Americans to wake up, see the truth, and those that did perpetrate the attacks won't be able to pull off another one.
1032285
You people need to remember 9/11 and what could have happened since then . More attacks and more innocent people killed . Just ask someone who lost a loved one in the 9/11 attacks and see if they like Bush .\nAsk yourself , would you like his job ..... I don't think so ....
1171171
no.  the only evidence that can be used is documents, sworn testimony, or affidavits.  otherwise, they don't have to admit to having said it and anything else is just heresay.
267455
I would believe him before ANY one in this administration.\nMaybe he would.
582216
He should be impeached for his signing declarations, by which he asserts a right of noncompliance with bills he signs into law, and for NSA wiretaps, through which he systemically bypassed court oversight of surveillance activity prescribed by law.  As for Iraq, I distrust all of Bush's motives and methods, and I opposed the war, but there is more gray in that one.