Does Britain have the largest population of big eared people?
827160
At least there is no census report. But by mere observation using the law of probability we may say that people with abnormally bigger sized ears are found in India because of Caucasian and Mongoloid mixture of racial stock.
585997
its not true in england.  sikhs have the biggest gurdwara in europe.
1180031
By land mass, Russia is the largest at 17,075,200 sq km, Canada is second largest at 9,976,140 sq km, United States is third largest at 9,629,091 sq km, and China is fourth at 9,596,960 sq km.\n\nIf by population, China is the largest at approx.1,306,313,812 people, India is second at approx. 1,080,264,388 people, and the United States is third at approx. 295,734,134 people.
903249
No. The percentage of the muslim population in Britain is still significantly outweighed by that of the Christian and non-muslim population. Hindus, Buddhists and Jews all contribute significantly to the British population. It is, however, entirely possible that in 30 years Britain will become a "Christian-minority" country where the sum of all other religious groups is more than the number of Christians while they will maintain status as the largest minority group.
292853
Great Britain no contest
1187280
perhaps people from the UK.
609691
Billions and billions of people
340803
depends what you want to know, however a couple facts:\n\nIt covered about 14.3 million square miles (more than 37 million km²), about a quarter of the world's total land area.\nBy 1921 the British Empire held sway over a population of about 470–570 million people\n\nsome more info can be found at:\nhttp://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9016519?query=british%20empire&ct=\nand\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_empire
559958
The latest figures I can find are for 1995 (first source), when there were 15,000,000 speakers out of a population of 131,000,000, i.e. about 11%.  The population is now about 168,000,000, so if the proportion has stayed the same, that would make it around 19,000,000 speakers.\n\nThe second source (2005) gives a figure of 17,000,000.\n\nThe third source gives a rough estimate of 5,000,000 speakers in urban areas whose English is good enough to work in call centres.\n\nIn all cases these are almost entirely second language speakers.  However as English is used in nearly all universities as the language of education and as the working language of government, the civil service and the millitary, the level of ability should be high amongst the better educated.
373820
The current distribution of the wolverine (Gulo gulo) does not include England (see the map and data at this link:\nhttp://bss.sfsu.edu/geog/bholzman/courses/Fall00Projects/wolverine.html )\nHowever, a fossil wolverine has been found in England dated at about 83,000 years before present, so they went extinct there after the Late Pleistocene, well before historical times.\n\nOriginal research article (sorry I don't have a link): Sutcliffe, A. J. et al. 1985. Wolverine in northern England at about 83,000 yr B.P. faunal evidence for climatic change during isotope stage 5. Quarternary Research: 24:73-86.\n\nThis fossil is also mentioned in this publication:\nhttp://wwwrses.anu.edu.au/environment/eePDFs/2005/2005%20-%20Pike%20et%20al%20-%20U-series%20dating%20of%20the%20Late%20Pleistocene.pdf
810839
I wouldn't say that it's normal but it seem's to be very common.  I lived in London for 3 years after college and I met very few Brits who were proud of their country, culture or heritage.  Many were planning to move away - usually to Australia.  I often heard that the British policy on providing amnesty to foreign nationals was too soft and that Britain wasn't Britain anymore.
248831
Not to many, I would guess. People haven't lived in caves in quite some time, so probably it is limited to hermits and the horrible subspecies of Morlocks.\n\nBut if you mean "how many people live on the world," well then that is a different matter entirely.
533498
Monaco has the highest density of people. China has the most people but, it is also very large lowering the population per acre
239060
The largest freshwater lake in the British Isles is Lough Neagh in Northern Ireland with a surface area of about 388 sq/km.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lough_Neagh
683311
Based upon your own information and bias, the Mongols were the best in the steps and open ground where they could use their horses.  Indeed, the largest empire (land area) in human history was the Mongol empire.\n\nBased upon who they met and never conquered: the Norse (as the Russ, who traveled to Russia) and the Celts.  The Golden Horde stopped in Poland and Novgorod.\n\nIt was also the Celts who stopped the Roman army from expanding to the very coasts of Europe and the British Isles.
517329
Germany has most people and biggest economy, but UK has most clout around the world. However the French are the biggest moaners, so I'm not sure.
1174914
UK Gov't statistics have:\n\n59 835 000 (2004)\n59 113 500 (2001)\n55 928 000 (1971)\n\nBut can't find figures for the years you specify yet!\n\nEDIT: OK, so I remembered another good source, here goes:\n\n60 218 000 (2005)\n59 113 000 (2001)\n57 439 000 (1991)\n56 357 000 (1981)\n55 928 000 (1971)\n52 807 000 (1961)\n50 225 000 (1951)\nn/a (1941)\n46 038 000 (1931)\n44 027 000 (1921)\n42 082 000 (1911)\n38 237 000 (1901)\n10 500 000 (1801)\n 5 600 000 (1750, estimate)\n\nThere has been a census of the UK population every 10 years since 1801, except during the war, hence the dates.\n\nInterpolating would give estimates of 52.5 million (1960) and 55.3 million (1969). 2006 figures are not available as yet. Judging by the current rate of growth, it will be around 60.6 million ;?)