What is the easiest way transmite a satelite signal for live coverage?
821872
Use another satellite phone.
322593
Goto to Linksys.com\n\nhttp://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_Content_C1&childpagename=US%2FLayout&cid=1114037291160&pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVisitorWrapper
104909
download sun wireless SDK. There is a demo to show how you do it.
1131954
Call the satelite provider and get their tech support.
378826
DLeibowitz nailed it for you.  I could add that the best reception can often be obtained by holding the receiver antenna similar to the transmitter antenna, especially for weak signals such as walkie-talkies.  Both should be held vertical (or horizontal) but parallel at right angles to the line-of-sight.  When riding in a vehicle, there may be dead spots and even how you point the vehicle when parked may help bring in a weak signal, especially with long whip antennas.  The signals will pass through ordinary glass (real old timers used to open their windows!) and wood but can be interferred with by intervening metal wires and objects that act like antennas.  The earliest "radio signals" were sparks (and radio operators on ships at sea were called "sparky").  Your radio may even pick up the "sparks" of an arcing spark plug wire in a car passing by (or the "sparks" of lightning storms even far away).  All home radios used to have antenna connections but AM receivers now often use the house wiring.  FM antennas may be circular rather than straight wires (or even small wire coils within the set).  FM broadcasts are more line-of-sight than AM broadcasts that can bounce off the ionosphere as well as transmit line-of-sight.  Short wave receivers could even receive foreign broadcasts that bounced all the way around the earth (but often faded in and out when the path was interupted).  Exceptionally short radio waves such as used by cell phones need very short antennas and the transmitted waves are very penetrating prompting current concerns that long time use may possibly contribute to brain tumors.  Remember that X-rays that are far shorter (higher frequency) than visible light waves are far more penetrating too.
887243
you need a tv tuner card, if you dont have one install one or you can get an external card that allows you to have the computer recieve satellite signal.   heres a good link on the explanation of the external tv tuner:  http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/external-pc-tv-theor/index.html
157367
The most common satellites use a C-Band frequency which "Beams" down the programs that we watch. Star Choice, Bell Express Vu, Directv, etc all use this type of frequency for that purpose. Those same satellites all use Ka-band and Ku-band for other purposes as in Satellite Internet and so on.\nAs for the names of each one, thats a little tougher, there are over 180 satellites in the sky for commercial use.\nThis site has a list of those satellites in order by what area of earth they are "beaming" to. http://www.lyngsat.com
253517
should be able send signals with minimum (atenuations)loss of signals;\nshould have a high transmission speed-Bandwith;\nAccessibility and reparable;\nproduces what enters from the begining at the end;
154153
There isn't one.  You would have to pay a company a lot to have a satalite tasked to a certain location at real time.  Google maps and google earth do not use real time images. They are no older then 3 years though.  You can also try live.local.com, but again it is not real time.
481190
What you'll need will depend upon the distances involved.  Two wireless access points with directional outside antennas (the so-called Pringles can type) can reach up to a mile or more.  Beyond that you'll probably need a parabolic dish.  That setup can reach up to 22 miles (!!) with very careful aiming.  Either of these are limited to line-of-site.\n\nIf you want the best possible connection, go with Cisco Aironet gear.  It's expensive -- $4,000 or so for two Aironets, two parabolic dishes and 50 feet of wave guide at each end -- but well worth the expense.\n\nAnother possibility is the Proxim Tsunami wireless bridge.  A pair will set you back about $3500.00.  Range is limited to about 6 miles but they are dead easy to set up, far easier than the Cisco Aironets.  If you ground the mast properly (read the docs!) they can even take a direct lightning hit.  That's not guaranteed, but I've worked with them and seen it happen.
651079
I'd try TerraServer first.  You're not likely to get LIVE satellite feeds, but it's still good info.
578666
Satellite Internet or use your neighbors wifi network :).
965096
What you are probably looking for is an RBGAN or BGAN (Broadband Global Area Network). These are pretty much small satellite Internet terminals meant for use in remote locations. In fact, many of the "streamed" news reports you have seen from Iraq use this exact device. Because of of the wide variety of applications for these devices, there are also just as many accessories so you will have no trouble finding any adapters necessary to use/charge them in just about any situation. RBGANs are currently being phased out for the newer BGANS which means that there are very good prices on them right now, but coverage will not be available after 12/31/08. Sooo... If you know you won't need it past 2008, go for the RGBAN, otherwise spring for the BGAN. I suggest you go with the INMARSAT satellite system since it is very well known and the one I am most familiar with. Satellite internet is NOT fast (normally around 144kbps, NOT cheap and you WILL be charged by the meg (think $10/MB). You should check out http://www.outfittersatellite.com/rbgan.htm and http://www.bgan.us/personal/personal.cfm if you are still serious about getting satellite internet. Good luck!\n\nOh, and the INMARSAT system DOES cover all of Africa.
172868
http://www.google.com/maps\nEnter your address\nClick on Satellite button
591485
there are many ways to connect a computer to a satellite. \nhttp://www.get-direcway.com/promotions2.htm for Internet\nyou can use a short wave radio and your sound card for weather fax or a terminal node controller a 2 meter radio and talk to a satellite. http://www.mfjenterprises.com/index.php
734330
Honestly, if you can't get a line-of-sight, you would be better advised to run a cable, with suitable bridge/repeaters.\nTo get a broadcast network over the kind of range and terrain, you're looking at pretty high power, and that will get you into licensing issues, as we all as great deal of expense.\n\nThinking laterally, if you put up a mast at each end, could you get a line of sight above the trees?  That might still be cheaper than the alternatives...
937133
There are no public system that allows for viewing live satelite images.\n\nSorry