How many errors in translation have there been?
830958
Not only that, but *originals* for the vast majority of books in the bible haven't existed for thousands of years.  All the translators have to work from are copies of copies of copies of copies...\nOh, but of course, we *know* that nobody made any errors, changes, or intentional additions or deletions when they made those hand-written copies, right? ;-)\n\nForget about the actual content, OF COURSE there are errors in just getting what's called the bible into your hands from the people who originally wrote the books.  Anyone who thinks there are no errors of any kind in the bible is very, very deluded.
534031
babelfish.altavista.com\nBut be warned, it's a literal translation, so it will not be perfectly accurate.
610712
yup. a friend of mine does translation and interpretation for businesses. Another does web design. i know a couple writers. one proofreader. What are you good at? I am guessing there is a way to do it from home.
221246
Translations.com does good work and has been around for a while.\nhttp://www.translations.com/
66751
Nope. Never has, although there have been attempts in the past to make English the official language.
632700
It is 'mutatio'.\nNEVER use babel or anything like that to translate; it just translates each word as a separate unit and pays not attention to grammar or syntax, which leaves you with a pidgin translation, and looking very stupid.
865131
have you tried the automatic translator service from google? there are dozens of sites that will give you an automated (not perfect) translation!
648149
wordlingo.com.... I don't know how accurate the translations are though.  I ususally translate from english to whatever language then take the translation and translate it back to english... sometimes it's pretty crazy the way it comes out.
310385
Try this translator, bookmark it for future reference.\n\nhttp://babelfish.altavista.com/
271550
No idea.\nHowever, this site contains a list of error corrections to the 1992 edition:\n\nhttp://www.uscibooks.com/seiderr.htm
394508
Bible's been translated in almost 32 langauges.\nList of translations\n\n    1 Afrikaans\n    2 Chinese\n    3 Croatian\n    4 Czech\n    5 Dutch\n    6 English\n    7 Esperanto\n    8 Finnish\n    9 French\n    10 German\n    11 Gothic\n    12 Greek (Modern)\n    13 Gullah\n    14 Hawaiian\n    15 Hungarian\n    16 Icelandic\n    17 Italian\n    18 Jèrriais\n    19 Klingon\n    20 Latin\n    21 Manx\n    22 Polari\n    23 Polish\n    24 Romanian\n    25 Spanish\n    26 Slavonic\n    27 Slovene\n    28 Swahili\n    29 Swedish\n    30 Welsh\n    31 Urdu\n    32 Hindi\n\n\nfor more information you can check it out here\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_translation
585189
can you be more specific as to what the error is or what it says exactly ?\n\nFrom what you have said all I can say is that it is self explanatory ie its scripts that have errors, which doesnt really help much.
3794
Freetranslation.com have a free website translation service:\n\nhttp://www.freetranslation.com/free/web.htm\n\nas well as a free text translation service.\nThere also offer professional translation services if you want improved quality.
800462
Sorry, my Gibberish to English translator is out of order. Please try again.
986291
Never considered that - quite insightful...\n\nBut I would bet that it does account for quite the number of misspellings...\n\nKind of disturbing.\n\n-dh
1130826
In an odd way, sweet_shy is right.  Sure, there are translation errors and parts of it may have been added or deleted, but it's still God's work.  It was divinely inspired; the only part that really matters is the message, and do you really think that he would let his message be corrupted?  The rest is just fluff to make it readable.  Now having read the New Testament, I find that what I read is entirely in line with my knowledge of God.  I think the message comes through just fine and there are no errors in it despite whatever stages the actual text has gone through.
784161
I can see only one paragraph. Aside from this there are several mistakes in the use of English.