When referring to sports memorabilia, what is a lithograph?
826100
A lithograph is a copied print of something, mostly used in relation to famous art pieces. In the case of sports, it would most likely be a replica of a signature on something. Maybe a poster or sports card or something, that would be a replica of the player's actual signature.\nHope that helps.
41108
You 'Dumbkid'. :)  You're handling it aren't you?\nYou will often see souvenir baseballs under glass.\nLet me try to find a source, but you can call a couple stores that sell models.  They should know where you can get a display case or will carry one.\n'Til then, you can use a sponge with a couple of drops of dish soap and lightly wipe the surface.  It will take a few minutes to see a difference.  The ink is permanent and will not be affected.\nOr at least be sure your hands are clean when handling it in the future.\nNow, tell us who autographed it.
572234
Something that is not in its permanent form yet ?You mean like the shadow of an idea or a concept? Usually you have to hire a print shop to help you with your format a little. Kinkos is good.You would almost certainly have to say what type of business it is before an accurate logo could be established.\nI think you may mean successfull. one way to decide this is drive around looking at popular businesses.
443092
registered product.\nthe logo or design has been registered so you cannot copy it
798380
cAN'T SEE BUT YOU NEED TO TAKE IT TO A SPORTS COLLECTABLE SHOP I'M SURE THEY CAN HELP
931647
Take it to a sports collector store and and get them appraised.  You could also buy a Beckett magazine.  They have the values of cards.  It is hard to say the value of a card without knowing the year, maker, condition, and card number.
321135
Usually, the worth of any given autograph will depend on a lot of specific details,\n\n1) The date of the autograph.  Depending on the person, early or late autographs can be more valuable.\n\n2) Condition of the autograph.\n\n3) What is the autograph on?\n\nand so on.\n\nFor a generic answer, here is one example of a site offering $100 for a Roy Rogers autograph.\nhttp://about-autograph-collecting.com/celebs2.htm
133793
A white out pen (the kind that erases mistakes).  You can still see it, but it doesn't photocopy on white paper.
47445
Stationery is the former (notes, papers, pens etc)\nStationary is the latter (still)
635242
I looked a little more about this for you and found this story about the pink jersey. Sorry it's kind of lengthy, but tells it all. Enjoy!\n\nThe Mystery of the Pink Jersey\n\nMike Laga amassed 423 career AB over the course of nine seasons between Detroit, St. Louis and San Francisco.  He had a .199 career average, and is probably best known for being the only player to have hit a baseball actually out of Busch Stadium (A foul ball left the park in September of 1986).  \n\nBut for me, Mike Laga will always be remembered for something else: The 1987 Topps card which depicts him wearing an airbrushed-pink jersey!  \n\nIn all my youth, the closest baseball cards came to perfection were those ’87 Topps.  Sure the early Upper Decks were nice; and I won’t sell the 1988-1989 and 1991-1992 Donruss sets short.  But those ’87 Topps had that special something: the perfect mix between action and posed photos.  The player-name box was tastefully understated.  The team logo was just the right size.  Many remember that set for the wood-grain frame that brought it all together.\n\nThe answer to the Mike Laga question has eluded me for years.  As a boy I wondered “why is Mike Laga wearing a pink jersey?”  Later it became “why would somebody at Topps airbrush a guy’s jersey pink?”\n\nMy first thought was that it might be an error card.  I hoped that something had happened when the film was being processed that botched the photo.  Error cards are worth a lot of money, right?  My 1981 Fleer Craig Nettles is an error card, and at one point it was worth $5.  $5!!!  I’ve got 800 of these Mike Laga cards, I might be rich!\n\nMy sister and I must have spent an entire summer trying to track down the 1988 Donruss Mark Grace rookie card; or the Fleer Billy Ripken with the dirty word on the knob of the bat.  I knew error cards were worth a lot of money (to a nine-year-old), and so when I saw that the ’87 Mike Laga was worth a mere $0.03, I quickly dismissed the notion that it was a true “error card.”  \n\nOne possibility is that Topps used a photo from Mike’s time in Detroit, although my first instinct is to reject this premise: the Tigers did utilize the three-band strip of elastic around the neckline, but the Tigers jerseys of 1986 buttoned-down (unless I am mistaken; admittedly I am not an authority on the history of Tigers uniforms).  The photo of Laga clearly indicates a jersey without buttons is being worn.  \n\nPlus, baseball card photos are traditionally taken during spring training, right?  Mike got dealt to St. Louis in 1986, so they could’ve easily snapped another photo of him during spring training of 1987; or they could have easily taken an action shot from the end of 1986.\n\nEven if this was a modified photo of Mike Laga in a Tigers jersey, it differed from what Topps would typically do for this situation.  For example, the 1988 Topps Doug DeCinces (card #446) features DeCinces in an Angels uniform having rounded second-base and possibly watching a play develop at third.  Across the top of the card the name “Angels” is spelled out in block letters, but in the lower-left corner of the card in 6 or 8 pt black type is written “Now with Cardinals.”  If the only thing that Topps had available for Mike Laga was a 1986 photo of him with the Tigers, why not simply note in the corner that he is “Now with Cardinals,” like they did for DeCinces?  \n\nI do know that card companies pay players for their photos (although in the 1980s it probably wasn’t much).  Did Topps not want to pony up an extra hundred bucks to pay Laga for a new photo?  If they felt that Mike was such a marginal player, why include him in the set at all?  In any event, the total costs of detailing a Mike Laga photo in 1987 probably far exceeded that of just paying him the $100 for a new photo.     \n\nAlthough the Mike Laga card is a mystery, it is not my favorite card in Topps set of 1987 (no disrespect to Mr. Laga).  My favorite was al
259568
appears to be an abstract paper.it invites the background in advertising your products.or even light papers,it approaches more appealing.
189865
Try http://www.supersteals.madebig.com ... This site is amazing, it's free, & I love it! They have great offers, rebates, & sometimes free shipping! Look for Pro Sports Memorabilia, or Star Struck Pro-Team, they might have some good info for you, or just go to "Shop Now" and you can do a search!
881726
Depends on if it's in good condition or not. And Topps cards weren't the greatest either, so it's hard to tell. Look it up somewhere on a sports card website.
1118772
wihtout a signature, date, or player associated with it, about $20.  SOrry.
521494
Please bear in mind, while original photos do still retain some intrinsic value, advances in technology which make it possible to recreate photos have taken away a lot of the re-sale value of such memorabilia. Also, there is a great deal of discussion that is targeted at bringing down the Kennedy mystique back to earth. Also, auction sites make it easier to sell such items, but it also lets people know there are more resources available as well.
108690
There are many different types, the most common is Litho but there's Riso, Silk screening, Flexo, Stocastic. These are all for large scale printing and there's of course different means of printing photo's using light techniques.
55762
The following article points out some of the tattoos that Amare sports. Hope this helps.