whats another way to say we wont stand for this?
814151
NO!\nWe will not even give this consideration.\nWe feel this is an untenable situation.\nWe will not tolerate such.\nWe do not condone this and will do all we can to see that it ceases.
878579
A more correct way would be "because they don't want to be disturbed". (However, as a side note, most of the people I know use "do not" instead of "don't".)\n\nSome extra corrections on what you've written:\n"Please, look at this answer and correct it for me:" and "Why have they rented a cottage in the mountains?"
651169
It stands for:  You Ain't Trax, You Ain't Sh...\n\nUsed by Marines.
1095322
"Naturally the common people don't want war, but they can always be brought to their goverments bidding. Simply tell them they are being attacked and chastise the left for being unpatriotic. It works the same in every country." - Herman Goering, Hitlers Reichmarshall at the Nuremberg trials.\nRight wing radio has been a real force for the White House in promoting the separation of Americans. The reason why is simple. If we dislike each other then there is no reason to talk to one another and share ideas. If the citizenry can be kept apart then the manufacture of consent can be accomplished easier. So we call each other names and label each other as Left/Right - Republicans/Democrats - Liberal/Conservative - Red State/ Blue State. All these phrases do nothing but to split AMERICANS apart.\nThe point of public relations slogans like "Support our troops" is that they don't mean anything... That's the whole point of good propaganda. You want to create a slogan that nobody's going to be against, and everybody's going to be for. Nobody knows what it means, because it doesn't mean anything. Its crucial value is that it diverts your attention from a question that does mean something: Do you support our policy? That's the one you're not allowed to talk about. As long as we keep forgeting that we are Americans and not the divisive phrases I listed above we will never learn about our right to open discussion and ideas. Like our founding fathers intended us to be.
188302
Peop;e are se;f wo;;ed \nthey do not want to recognize the sovreign rights of their creator.\nWe are willful  self willed and do not want to recognize his authority.\nWe do not want to give up even things that are harmful to our selves.
614716
hold the pickle, hold the lettuce,\nspecial orders don't upset us,\nAll we ask is that you let us serve it your way.\n\nHave it YOUR way, Have it your way,\nHave it your way at Burger King.
50703
In Oz we use that to mean something similar to, "I'm going to kill them." Not literal killing of course.  Just that you are going to get seriously angry with them.
1154409
what would they call us
318122
Leave them alone!! unless you can prove conclusively that they mean harm to others.\nI mean:- Can Prove Conclusively, that they mean harm to others,not just some BS weapons of war theory.
856380
dont say my name\n\n
670201
(Cold comfort version):  "This too shall pass."\n\n(Better):  You get off from work soon!\n\n(Best):  Hey sexy! Your silver-tongued charm will be     fully operational again tomorrow, so all of the a**** will be charmed off the donkeys again, and you can rejoice once more in being your own suave self!  :0)
513708
Too cool for the ROOM!!   eh?\n\nyeah mannnnnnn!\n\nfight the machine...mannnn\n\nrelax you are not that important and you are not "on to something"\n\nMannnnnn!
567931
Retorical Question  \n\nA question not intended to be answered.
268437
prevailing standard\n\naccepted standard\n\n"the right way"
274857
Nosce te ipsum.\n\nNot quite so pithy in Latin.
509340
Refuse/resist\n\nSepultura
237927
well in this day and age fuck off can be the same as shut up.i don't know what context it was used in, but let him no u wont stand for that, give him one more chance then u must leave if he does or he will walk all over you.