i have no idea about computers, but could someone pleas tell me what processor is faster? 600mHz or 1.3? help!
820877
If it is 600MHz vs. 1.3GHz, then the 1.3Ghz is faster.  1GHz = 1000MHz.  You should know that both of those processors are really really old and out of date.
458454
Here is an article explaining why the single-core FX-57 would be faster for gaming than a dual core AMD;\nhttp://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2005/06/27/amd_fx_57/1.html\nAMD FX-57 is the fastest single core chip on the market.\nA DFI Lanparty board is best know for its overclocking abilities: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813136009\nI believe the A8N32-SLI Deluxe has the fastest benchmarks of the motherboards for socket 939\nhttp://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813131568
80142
Intel's Pentium M (m is for "mobile") and P4 are different style chips, so it is difficult to compare them on clock speed alone.  \n\nWhen I purchased my laptop (two years ago), I did some research on this topic.  The claim at that point was that the 1.6 MHz mobile was about the same as a 3.5 MHz P4.  This may have been in PC Magazine or something online.  (Can't find the source quickly.)\n\nThe main thing is that the M chips suck less energy, which is good in laptops, where battery life and heat are more important.
134858
Try getting a faster processor. I just bought a 2.4GHZ laptop Pentium 4 and office opens SUPER FAST! FASTER than my 1.3 GHz Laptop!Also, I have 512 MB RAM.
590601
1.8 is pretty fast.  That's about a 3.0 on an Intel chip.  Intel chips inflate their frequencies quite a bit.  However, a 1.8 centrino for example will perform like a 4.0 pentium if not better.
1027735
possibly 3.1ghz but be careful i tried overclocking myself once and it didn't go too well
33063
Ok, so, in general, Higher is always better. As long as you have a processor that can handle it, you should always move up. I've basically  revamped my computer about 3 times, just upgrading, so I don't have to get new everything. It's alot cheaper. BUT, go for the 512. 1 gig of RAM is ok, I guess, but keep a sharp eye out for a new processor. If you can afford it, get the pentium D.
355709
I always tell people to stay away from celeron processors.  Sure they're cheaper, but you get what you pay for.  A laptop with a pentium M processor is probably going to be smaller than one with an AMD.  AMD processors run a little hotter, so they require more space, but they are also slightly faster.  What I would go for though is the new Intel Core Duo processor.  It has two processing cores on one chip so it's a lot faster.  I think Dell just released an inspiron with one in it.  Apple's got them in a laptop as well.  I'm sure there are also many other companies that are going to have them in their machines as well.  But if you have to chose between the three you listed above, go with pentium or amd.  You really wont notice much of a difference between the two.  Just stay away from celeron.
769423
Okay always remember this: 64-bit Processors are WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYY better than a 32-bit processor becuase they have faster data transfer rate so I always recommend AMD processors with 64 in the title, I don't really care for Intel Processors. Even though this is a bit of topic, heres a question.... Which is better an Intel Pentium 4 with 1. ghz or an AMD Athlon XP 1800+, well the answer is the 1800+, even though the processor speed will be lower than the Intel Pentium but because of higher data transfer speed in AMD CPU's you notice higher speeds in AMD processors, so I recommend always go with the AMD.
521058
You need to take a broader look to decide which CPU/Chipset combination is good for you. There are several factors thatshould influence your choice besides clockspeed, like L2 cache, memory access and technology (DDR vs DDRII), I/O buses, etc.\n\nAMD Athlon 64 seems to be the natural choice for gamers today, but I would strongly recommend to wait until Intel's Conroe is out. It will kick AMD's a*se big time.\n\nhttp://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2748\n \n\nFor great head-to-head comparisions check Anandtech at: http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/
286003
64bit processors have the ability to run 64 bit operating systems(i.e. windows xp pro 64bit), and use 64 bit applications. 64 bit allows more system memory, among other things. Yeah the fx55 amd is over $1000 and is "only" 2.6ghz. But it is the fastest cpu in existance right now, so that "justifies" it's price. It beats an intel 3.8ghz. A 64bit 1.8ghz cpu, which is equivalent to a p4 3ghz is about $150. Not that expensive, and way cheaper than intel's new 64 bit chips.
222271
the 3.06 p4 run quite a bit hotter than the 1.6, so yes get at new cooling fan rated for the processor you have. Tiger direct has them cheap, so does Spartan Tech. I believe both ship world wide. Maker sure your 3.06 is really a 775 socket CPU as Socket 478 cpu's wont fit in a 775 motherboard. Then buy the appropriate fan.
734126
The first one is faster than the second one.  533Mhz > 400Mhz.  I would trust crucial.com.  Although both will work for your system.\n\nAlso, buying from a major brand is always better than buying generic.  The memory will perform much better.\n\nAlso again, if I were you, I would look into getting a 512mb stick of RAM instead of the 256mb.  That would give you a grand total of 1024mb or 1gb of ram, which is what I would recommend to take full advantage of that system.\n\nGive this a try . . . http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820231038\n\nAnd to the answer above, yes SODIMM has a 200 pin version.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodimm
26067
We are talking about levels of cache here.  The previous post is talking about the amount of level 1 cache as compared to what the original poster is talking about which is level 2 cache.  Am I wrong?\n\n\nBottom line, the pentium is faster.  This is due to the pentium's amount of cache that is "closer" to the processor.
299993
If it's a single thread program, the pentium 3.0 ghz\nIf it's a multi thread program, the dual core.
710631
I have 2 Dell core duo laptops that I want to sell off right now. \n\nOne is 1.66GHz and the other is 1.83GHz, they both have 1GB RAM. Honestly, you may not be able to notice the difference in speeds. And the difference in prices of those 2 that I'm selling is $40.\n\nSo if that 40 bucks is not much to some people, they will go for the 1.83GHz, but personally, the 1.66GHz will do just fine to me.
1076428
Depends on what you do really. if you just use it for basic word processing, its probably not a big deal. but if you use it for more intense things such as development or gaming, then yes, its really time for an upgrade. The processor of the new model you mentioned will be roughly 3 to 4 times more powerful. Even more maybe since your computer is kind of old. Also look at RAM (memory) and you should get at least 512 mb 600 mhz. However, your computer way obsolete when it comes to power. But like I said, depending on what you do, it may not be an issue.