Who did adam eve eat of the fruit?
826987
I am not sure what your question is but we should always be thankful for GOD has given us.
155500
Her name was Lilith.  I believe, but might be wrong, that it is a hebrew origin.  She was suppose to be Adams first wife, make from the earth.  She wouldn't submit or be subserviant to Adam so god cast her out of the garden of eden.  He then made eve from adams rib.  Alot of things have been said about her like she became a demon, a vampire, evil, etc.  Just go to any major search engine and look her up, the variety of legands are great reading!
444313
it all depends on what the word says.Eve didnt make Adam eat the fruit,some christians may say stuff cause there confused.Adam wanted to listen to man kind not God,so that left him with a curse,and it depends on how many sins you did and if u live your life the way god wants us to!!!!!
372298
Eve did not eat an apple.  The word touch means to lay with a woman  and the word beguiled means wholly seduced. And the serpent is not a snake; it's Satan playing one of his first roles.  Trees, yup there were fruit trees there in the garden but in reading Eze 31 we find that sometimes God uses trees  "as" peoples.  trunks= the body and limbs= arms & legs.  Adam & Eve covered their private parts with fig leaves, not their mouths
1002740
WHAT was the original sin? “Sex,” many people will answer. They believe that the forbidden fruit in the garden of Eden was a symbol of sexual relations and that Adam and Eve sinned by committing a sexual act.\n\nThe idea is not new. According to historian Elaine Pagels, “the claim that Adam and Eve’s sin was to engage in sexual intercourse” was “common among such [second-century] Christian teachers as Tatian the Syrian, who taught that the fruit of the tree of knowledge conveyed carnal knowledge.” Also, to Christendom’s Church (so-called Christians) Father Augustine of the fifth century C.E., sin had its beginnings in sexual desire on Adam’s part. In fact, Psychology Today said “Adam’s sin was carnal knowledge.”\n\nMany do not know that this interpretations flatly contradict the context of the Genesis account. The law in question is recorded at Genesis 2:16, 17: “From every tree of the garden you may eat to satisfaction. But as for the tree of the knowledge of good and bad you must not eat from it, for in the day you eat from it you will positively die.”\nWas that really a veiled reference to sex? Well, as recorded at Genesis 1:27, 28, God commanded the man and the woman to “be fruitful and become many and fill the earth.” How were Adam and Eve to obey that command without having sexual relations? Are we really to suppose that God gave them a command and then sentenced them to death for trying to obey it?\n\nBesides, the Genesis account shows that Adam and Eve sinned separately, not simultaneously. Chapter 3, verse 6, makes it clear that Eve was seduced to eat of the fruit first and that “afterward she gave some also to her husband when with her and he began eating it.” So eating of the forbidden fruit would make an inept and farfetched symbol of sexual intercourse.\n\nWas it Knowledge:  What about the claim that the forbidden fruit was a symbol of all knowledge? Actually, both Adam and Eve had already taken in plenty of knowledge before they disobeyed the law at Genesis 2:16, 17. Their Creator, Jehovah himself, was directly involved in their education. For instance, he brought all animals and birds to the man for him to name them. (Genesis 2:19, 20) \nNo doubt Adam would have had to study each one carefully in order to give it an appropriate name. What an education in zoology! Eve, although created later, was also not ignorant. When questioned by the serpent, she showed that she had been educated in God’s law. She knew the difference between right and wrong, and she even knew the consequences of wrong actions.—Genesis 3:2, 3.\nInterpretation of original sin as either sex or knowledge is just that—human interpretation, nothing more. Its weakness is shown up by the question of the faithful man Joseph: “Do not interpretations belong to God?” (Genesis 40:8) The Bible is much easier to understand when we do not impose human ideas on it but, rather, let it interpret itself. \n\nWas It Disobedience?   By eating of that fruit, what were they doing? The New Catholic Encyclopedia timidly suggests: “It could have been, simply, an open defiance of God, an insolent refusal to obey Him.” Is that not what Genesis clearly says? Romans 5:19 confirms the point: “By one man’s disobedience many were made sinners.” (The New Jerusalem Bible) The original sin was an act of disobedience.\nA footnote in The New Jerusalem Bible puts it this way: “It [the knowledge of good and bad] is the power of deciding for himself what is good and what is evil and of acting accordingly, a claim to complete moral independence . . . The first sin was an attack on God’s sovereignty.” \n\nprerogative to set the standards for man as to what is approved or what is condemned. By refusing to obey God’s law, man was calling into question God’s very right to rule over him. Jehovah justly answered the challenge by allowing man to rule himself. Wouldn’t you agree that the results have been disastrous?
571901
Ooh, nice question.\n\nActually, I think you could make a strong case that they didn't have sex until after they left Eden. There's no mention of it, and I know they had no children when they left. \n\nIt was eating the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge that made them realize they were naked; is it possible they were having sex prior to this, yet failing to notice this one detail? Which they then figured out from eating a piece of fruit? \n\nI could almost imagine them just not bothering to contemplate the fact that they had different genitals because the subject never "came up", as it were. But the whole Fig Leaf story just sounds absurd if they were copulating the whole time.\n\nAfter the Fall, of course, it wouldn't really matter if they sinned or not, having already been declared sinners.\n\nOn the other hand, if they weren't having sex prior to the Fall, and one assumes that God intended, or at least hoped, that they would not disobey Him and remain in Paradise forever, one has to wonder why He would give them genitals at all. I mean, seriously, what's the point? \n\nAgain, good question.
632638
if eve did not bite the fruit, she would not ask adam to eat it. Then they will  end up having a talk, look passively at each other then grin , tell in their mind" this is borin" say good bye n would have gone in two different ways. \n  and we all would not have born in this damn world!!!.
1069537
He was as fooled as Eve and as guilty. He was standing right there when Eve picked and ate the fruit. HE didn't even try to stop her. But as a coward he waited to se if she died before he ate.
841617
After spending time with Eve, Adam was walking in the Garden with God. Adam told God how much the woman means to him and how blessed he feels to have her. Adam began to ask questions about her. \nAdam: Lord, Eve is beautiful. Why did you make her so beautiful? \n\nGod: So you will always want to look at her. \n\nAdam: Lord, her skin is so soft. Why did you make her skin so soft? \n\nGod: So you will always want to touch her. \n\nAdam: She always smells so good. Lord, why did you make her smell so good? \n\nGod: So you will always want to be near her. \n\nAdam: That's wonderful Lord, and I don't want to seem ungrateful, but why did you make her so stupid? \n\nGod: So she would love you\n\n\n\nhaha love that one =]\n\nxx
721891
The fruit came first.\n\nRead up!
860980
Do you know the bible story of Adam and Eve? Well, to eat the apple was a sinful act, and Adam was told specifically not to eat it. His wife took teh apple and bit into it, then showed it to him and told him to do likewise. It didn't take a lot to tempt him into eating it, because it looked so delicious, and the hunger for knowlege was consuming him. So, long story short, to be the apple of someone's eye is to be the temptation to him/her becaus ethey want you so much. It is also used in fondness by parents or friends, and that meaning differs slightly, meaning that you are very precious in their life.
57732
Actually, she ate the fruit of the tree of knowledge, not necessarily an apple. She wanted knowledge without paying for it and was kicked out of paradise and then realized she needed some clothes.
461596
Came from the koranic, biblical, belief. It wan't exactly apple as per the holy scriptures... it cam efrom there. People like to beleive that Adam really didn't swallow IT and IT is stuck in his throat.
1148705
Adam and Eve.  Read your Bible.
1181331
Do you recall the Marijuana plants in the garden of Eden? I didnt think so...and if you think we should eat every plant that exist in the world today how about a hemlock brownie?...a little Hemlock and your going to be dead or in the hospital. the verse you speak of was in Genisis at the start of creation when Adam and Eve were In Eden and were told the could eat of any tree in the garden except the tree in the midst of the garden....they were kicked out of Eden...and all plants are not healthy here.
326516
The fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Bad is not known, and besides, it wasn't the fruit itself that was the problem...it was Adam and Eve's obedience that was the issue!
897923
Only fruit from the forbidden tree in Eden could not be eaten.\n\nToday's apples don't come from the forbidden tree.   Therefore, there's no problem with eating them.\n\nIn fact, Christianity encourages people to take care of their health, as our bodies are "temples of the Spirit."   Since apples are healthy food, eating them is actually something Christianity would encourage.\n\n.