Recent attack on Pakistani Army shows clearly the intigirity of Pakistan against terrorist.Should?
815948
Depends on what to demands are we have all to often been short on long term planning when it comes to arming people and then having it come back to bite us. I would perfer investments in assisting its citizens as well as the military
897885
Simplistic to the extreme...Osama is pretty much out of the picture. He can't do much from a cave in the wilds of Pakistan. Sending orders by Carrier pigeon doesn't work in this era. \nWe are fighting a losing war because we are *far* to worried about world and leftist US opinion. We should take the gloves off and not be bothered about civilian deaths or a blown up Mosque or 50.
233679
Pakistan is a military state & is currently US-ally in fighting the so called terrorism .. so it is in the Axis of Good >> but as soon as Musharaf killed .. Pakistan will not doubt be called AXIS OF EVIL.
768334
I'm not sure what the free world should do about Pakistan but I do think it harbors terrorists so we certainly should keep a close watch on it.  We simply must not continue to be blase about terrorism just because most of it is on the other side of the pond.  It only takes a plane ride (as we learned) to bring it here.  Terrorists have one agenda: to kill us.  If we don't stop them, they will succeed..
213218
America is clearly seeing its own interests and is supporting a country who will be able to help them in future. And clearly  this country is india and not pakistan since india is stronger economically, technologically, militarily and is becoming an important global player. This has nothing to to do with peace in the Indian subcontinent or with ethics.
703699
My own opinion is that I have met and worked with people from Pakistan and they are just as fine and hard working as anyone else.  However, there are many in that nation that have been seduced by radicalism.  Unfortuantely this makes them less than friendly to the west and it;s values.
428238
hardworking pakistanis are working for the progress and name of their country despite of thier small size..they don't want to be under shadow of india just b'cauz india is bigger in its area.\nthing what should come into the minds is only "Struggle for peace and progress"
41507
I'd say that Musharraf is putting on an act for his people.  There's no way that the US would have launched that attack without his knowing about it and his agreement to launch the attack.  Remember, he wants to prevent the terrorists from taking over his country like they took over Afghanistan (pre US involvement).
999545
Yes.\n\nAny government that launches OFFENSIVE military action is by definition terrorist.
1181744
Yeah you are right and they even have the audacity to say things like whoever attacks them or tries to take their nukes out then they will hit India and they say this after four defeats in four wars.India should teach them a lesson and the POK should be recaptured  because it is a part of india and the pakis are illegaly occupying it and using it as a launching pad for terrorist activities against India.Pakistan should not play with India's patience 'cause when it does run out then Pakistan will have no place to hide.
537408
Well Man! I am from Pakistan but that does not mean I have any grudge. My true assesment or spontaneous view is that because of the situation of geo-politics and ofcourse the relationship between Pakistan and India, nobody want to be a part of situation where Pakistn and India (God bless us) again in any tense situation, I mean when any country think about investment in defence sector of these two countries they have to think closely or stop thinking.\na layman view
628374
Ofcourse.We are trying our best.Pakistan has to take the step now.
1150280
Judging by your past answers and questions, you have no grasp of how this Islamic Terror thing works. \n\nI bet the head alien who is planning the invasion is hiding in Pakistan!!\n\nLook at this link, this is the governments list of known religious terror organizations. Look at what the majority have in common. \n\nhttp://www.tkb.org/Category.jsp?catID=10&contentType=1&sortBy=0&sortOrder=0&pageIndex=0\n\n\nYes I am, they are all conected by Islam. The radical islamist around the world are unifed by their hatered of the west. We are not unifed so they have the upper hand.
885855
Pakistan has a long way to go to upset history. Personally if that happened, they had a superpower like the US to help them pull that off.\n\nDon't see the US   doing that, period!\n\nPeople who can lie, cheat, and kill to try to move ahead don't do very well at the end of any matter.\n\njust an observation
1129995
Terrorist acts (suicide bombings, hi-jackings, hostage taking) are the acts of cowards, but in the minds of "terrorists" these tools are effective.  They are intended not to hit a military target, but to cause such an outrage among the CIVILIAN population that they are willing to force their governments to comply or concede to the "terrorists".  They also use these acts to call international attention to their cause.  What is more compelling, at least in the terrorist mind, than dead women, children, and elderly splashed across a television screen on the news programs of the "civilized" world?  \n\nSo, should we ignore it an expect it to go away?  That's what President Clinton did, to an extent.  And look what happened on 9/11.  So no, we can't ignore it.  But we can fight them, not on their own terms, but on our own.  We can show them that WE ARE NOT GOING TO BACK DOWN, WE WILL NOT CONCEDE, WE WILL NOT GIVE IN TO TERROR!  That is how you fight terrorism.
200285
not sure what you mean. Are there terrorists in Pakistan? Yes. Do the govermenet supports them? not officialy.\nIs it in the list of terrorist countries? no\nDo we consider it an ally on the war on terror? yes\nIs Osama hiding there? who knows.
701310
Terrorism is killing or threatening to cause physical harm to a civilised society in the name of some cause. Terrorism breeds out of perceived injustice whose advantage is taken by unscrupulous elements. There are different types of terrorism- religion-based, territory-based or state-sponsored.\nIrrespective of the type of terrorism the propagators try to justify it in the name of certain cause or ideology.\n\nReligious Terrorism: Example Al-Qaida who led Muslims to believe that they have been historically mistreated and must fight to avenge that.. Truth is that such people follow no religion because no religion propagates violence.\nTerritory-based Terrorism: Example LTTE in Sri Lanka, ULFA in Assam. They believe that their territory has been 'occupied' to external forces and they must fight to overthrow their oppressors. Truth is, in most cases, these people are greedy to control and exert their power with vested interests and little interest in public welfare.\nState Sponsored: BY FAR THE MOST DANGEROUS. Example Hitler in Germany, George Bush in USA, Narendra Modi in Gujarat, Musharaf in Pakistan, who use government machinery and armed forces to spread terror. The reason it is so dangerous is because people like Hitler and George Bush have access to tremendous resources, arms and ammunition to attack soft targets to further their propoganda.\n\nRemedies:-\nEvery country must actively co-operate and ensure to root out terrorism from their soil. \nResolving issues through negotiations and via multi-lateral forums like UN.\nAllaying fears in the minds of people, by avoiding 'us against them' and 'clash of civilization'  kind of rhetorics.\nEducating people and providing employment opportunities to disillusioned youth to ensure that they utilize their energy positively.