Do you think that Daniel Radcliffe suits the role of Harry Potter?
823807
More than people realize. He's not only Harry's mirror image, and a good actor, he is also a Leo, born in the year of the snake. And his birthday is only two weeks from Harry's.
368302
Actually I am Daniel Radcliffe... and I've been to Greece 2 already... Loved it and will go again in the future.
896373
I am a 23-year-old Harry Potter fan. Yeah, lame but I can't help it. I have read all the Potter books and seen all the Potter movies. In general the books are way better than the movies. I think this is true with every book-into-film movies.\n\nThe first HP movie was nice. I liked it. The second one too. They were more to the book than the third one. The third movie to me is the lamest of them all. I hate the way they did the storyline and I didn't like that they changed the movie sets. The school's all different from the first two movies. Third one got thumbs down from me. The fourth one was fun. I liked it. It was more to the book. I went to see the midnight show for the fourth movie. Now the third and fourth movies are soooo badly acted that it's embarassing to watch. The three main characters are supposed to be more friendly and comfortable with each other. They're really tight buds in the books and in the movies they seem alittle awkward  with each other. I don't buy it that they're best friends. Hopefully the fifth movie will be more believable. I hope so. \n\nBottom line: The Harry Potter books are better than the movies.\n\n\nCheers to Potter fans:)
797996
Well, people like Harry because he's just trying to live. Draco, as a character, is a rotten person. His family is long line of dark wizards and Death Eaters. So, if you were going to have anything to do with the Malfoy's, just be careful never to offend them. Trust me, they'd have no problem flinging a poisonous snake at you. Oh, also make sure you're a pure-blood, or something really close, else you have no chance at all. This is the character I'm describing. The actor, Tom Felton, well, I don't know anything about him. Other than he was looking Harry in the eye in the first two films, but towered over him in the third. Which may be why he was standing on the ledge below Harry in his only shot in the fourth film. Oh, plus his hair was just like it was described in the book for the first two films, but then was really wild and gross in the third. I'm glad he combed it in the fourth.
1059279
Harry Potter - Daniel Radcliffe\nRon Weasley - Rupert Grint\nHermione Granger - Emma Watson\n\nhttp://www.imdb.com/title/tt0241527/fullcredits
240358
Here are some suggestions:  Paul Giamatti (or the guy who played opposite him in Duets - he 'd be good, though you need a big name I guess).  Jim Carey should play a sinister role sometime soon.  Nicolas Cage would be a strong lead. Jemery Irons - kinda obvious.  Matthew Broderick would be great for that "boy next door wouldn't hurt a fly" kinda look.  Ralph Fiennes would be awesome because he looks a little psycho anyway.  Clive Owen would be a great, scary-strong looking hitcher.
908247
I believe Daniel will portray a more grittier portrayal and more closer to Ian Flemming's creation he is a great actor . To those who only comment on his looks how many secret agents really have amazing features its a nice change for Bond to look more like the boy next door.
394656
Not sure how he will fit into the part. I read the book 3 times and still trying to picture him ....also trying to think of who my choice would have been. Time will tell ~ just hope the movie does the book justice when it opens next month.
982274
He is super cute. DId you see him in Tristan and Isolde? He was looking hot! I love him in spiderman has harry, he looks hot as that character too. i also love his voice, its so deep.
278091
I've seen all 3 films, and really liked them all, and will see his latest soon.  Except that he's English, and as someone else said, this was his first major gig at movies, and he's only 14 years old, there's not much I can say about him.  I like his partner in crime, Emma Wasson though.  I believe she's a better actor/actress than Radcliffe and might go father in future films than he does.  Even when they are together in a certain scene, she seems to direct the movie, and Radcliffe follows her directions.  Of course, both at 14, this could change soon.  Most child actors don't make it in the adult world of movies, but there are exceptions.
642804
I believe Severus Snape from the Harry Potter books has been proved too be bad, but I think that behind the smoke screen, hes good. Heres Why - \nWARNING: SPOILER FROM HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF BLOOD PRINCE!!!\n1. Snape Lies to Narcissa and Bellatrix... Twice\n\nDuring the meeting that Snape has at his house with Narcissa and Bellatrix in chapter 2, Snape tries to explain to them why he never killed Harry all those years at Hogwarts when he had ample opportunity:\n\n"Of course, it became apparent to me very quickly that he had no extraordinary talent at all. He has fought his way out of a number of tight corners by a simple combination of sheer luck and more talented friends. He is mediocre to the last degree..." (HBP pg 31/36)\n\nBut we know Snape knows this is a lie. We know Snape knows that Harry is a powerful wizard. We know he knows Harry is a parselmouth. We know he knows Harry could conjure a corporeal patronus when he was just 13 years old. We know he knows Harry has stood up to and prevailed against Voldemort five times!\n\nBut not even one whole page later, Narcissa is crying to Snape she has something she wants to say, but has been forbidden to talk about by Voldemort. Snape immediately replies that she should follow Voldemort's orders, and sister Bellatrix agrees. But Snape appears troubled by the conversation:\n\nBut Snape had gotten to his feet and strode to the small window, peered through the curtains, and then closed them again with a jerk. He turned around to face Narcissa, frowning. (HBP pg 32/37)\n\nWhat happened to make him jerk the curtains closed all of a sudden and turn back to the women, frowning? Has he had a revelation?\n\nIt is only at this point that he confides in them that he already knows the plan, that Voldemort has already told him. He's lying again! \n\nIf he already knew the plan, why would he have taken the position, just one moment earlier, that she should follow Voldemort's law and not speak of it? \n\nWe know Snape is a powerful Legilimens, we learned that in the Occlumency scenes with Snape and Harry in Order of the Phoenix. Just in case we forgot about Legilimency, J.K. mentioned it just a few pages ago. Questioning Voldemort's trust in Snape, Snape interrupts:\n\n"You think he is mistaken? Or that I somehow hoodwinked him? Fool the Dark Lord, the greatest wizard, the most accomplished Legilimens the world has ever seen?" (HBP pg 26/31)\n\nHaving just been on the verge of spilling the beans to Snape, Draco's assignment must have been top-most in Narcissa's thoughts, and in the quiet moment at the window, Snape saw it in her mind. He then lies to them about already knowing the plan, to gain their trust.\n\nSo, at the same time that Snape is trying to convince Narcissa and Bellatrix that he's worthy of Voldemort's trust, we can see he is lying to them, several times. That can only mean that Snape isn't as loyal to Voldemort as he'd like Bellatrix and Narcissa (and us!) to believe.\n\n2. What Hagrid Overheard\n\nHarry is talking to Hagrid after the poisoning of Ron, and Hagrid lets it slip that he overheard something he shouldn't have:\n\nI was comin' outta the forest the other evenin' an' I overheard 'em talking -- well, arguin'. ... I jus' heard Snape sayin' Dumbledore took too much fer granted an' maybe he -- Snape -- didn' wan' ter do it anymore ... Dumbledore told him flat out he'd agreed ter do it an' that was all there was to it." (HBP pg 405/380)\n\nThis clue comes right out and tells us that Snape is following the orders of Dumbledore, although we now see whatever Snape has promised to do for Dumbledore is difficult or unpleasant.\n\nWe also now have comfirmation that Dumbledore has a plan, which involves Snape, and Dumbleore is confident that the plan that Snape has agreed to will proceed.\n\n3. No DADA Teacher Has Lasted More Than 1 Year\n\nFor every Hogwarts yea
579754
presently robert langdon in da vinci code
436249
Dont know\nI think he finally could, his hair had to be a certain way in the first few films (based on the books) but for the 5th movie I dont think it will matter. There is so much going on in the story (again, based on the book) his hair isn't going to be of much concern. \n\nI hope that they can finish making the movies before the kids get too old. I cant imagine any other actors taking any of the leading actors places. \nOne good thing is that the writer of this series actually lets her characters grow and age, so the main characters do not stay one age infinately, which is something that happens in other written series. So to see Harry Potter at 18 will follow the storyline int he series, it wont be a shock. (even if Daniel Radcliff is in his early 20's, he can still play an 18 year old. Anyone remember the 30-somethings that played the 90210 high school students?)
839305
The trailer looks good. Glad to see Gary Oldman back. Even happier to see Helena Bohnam Carter and Imelda Staunton join the gang of elite British actors camping it up for Harry Potter.\n\nJust a little concerned about how they are going to cramp all that story into a single movie. Order of The Phoenix is my favourite in the series. I was kinda disappointed at all the jarring omissions from The Goblet of Fire. The character of Rita Skeeter is the writer's satirical take on the fakeness of the media. All reduced to a side note. And how about Hagrid's half giant legacy?\n\nI know Order of The Phoenix will never be better than the book but I'm sure the film makers will at least make it entertaining.
615350
oliver wood was played by sean biggerstaff, but to answer the question, id prefer draco malfoy! he's so much better looking and much more talented. But to be completely honest id rather have lucius....
259919
Harry Potter??? There are lot of Harry/Hermione shippers... Harry/Ginny shippers... But since Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince - its Ginny n Harry confirmed.\nIf he survives the 7th book... he might marry someone ... but we wont know..\nIf you are talkin about Daniel Radcliffe.... he is only 16 - don't you think it's a bit too early to get married??? Dont know about him though...
576795
The guy who plays him in the films is called Daniel Radcliffe. \nIn the books:\nHis full name is Harry James Potter.He is called Potter or Mr Potter by his teachers, scar-head or potty by Draco Malfoy and Harry by his friends ('mate' by Ron). The public knows him as the-boy-who-lived, or the son of Lily and James Potter.Hagrid calls him 'arry, but that's 'cos of his accent...\n\nYou are aware that he is a fictional character, and therefore doesn't have a 'real' name as such, though, aren't you? Daniel Radcliffe is just an actor...