How often can a court case be re-tried?
817214
Theoretically, an infinite number of times.  Unless there is a finding in the case or the case is dimissed with prejudice it is still active and can be tried over and over until a verdict is reached.  Of course there are practical considerations and often times, the state will give up and not try to go forward with the case when it becomes obvious that no jury is ever going to be unanimous.
493886
sometimes twice or more
213394
Contact the court clerks office with your information. There's a small fee involved in processing it again.
271524
Judgements will now just fall off. In most states they can keep renewing judgments every ten years FOREVER. They also have ways of collecting judgments depending on the laws of your state(I.E. - taking from your bank account, lean on your home). My suggestion is save up enough to pay it and do so.
935015
I haven't been able to find a time limit and think that our legislators have been reluctant to impose any time limit because the evidence in some cases is notoriously time consuming to put together.  What I do know is that every so often the CPS will have kind of spring cleaning session and turn up in court with a big pile of cases which they want to get rid of.  There are three basic ways of achieving this in the magistrates' court. The first is by the use of the power in section 23 Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 ('s.23'). The second is by applying to withdraw the summons or charge and the third is by offering no evidence in court.\n\nDiscontinuance under s.23 can take place at any time until the magistrates begin to hear evidence in a trial. Timely termination of proceedings is in the interests of justice. The power to discontinue enables The CPS to terminate proceedings as soon as practicable after the decision is taken and avoids the need for a court hearing or the attendance of the parties. It also enables a defendant in custody to be released immediately without the need to wait until the next hearing. For these reasons, where it is intended to discontinue the entire proceedings, the preferred method of termination is normally discontinuance under s.23. \n\nAs a general rule, a decision to terminate proceedings on the ground of public interest is final. Only in exceptional cases is it appropriate to re-institute proceedings terminated on public interest grounds. On the other hand, when the decision has been taken on the basis of insufficient evidence, it is open to the prosecution to re-institute the proceedings if further evidence comes to light. \n\nThe defendant has a right to request the revival of proceedings which have been discontinued under s.23. S/he must make the request within 35 days of the notice being sent to the court. The most likely reason for a revival notice is the defendant's wish to be formally acquitted on the offence or offences charged.\n\nThe effect of the revival request is to turn the clock back so that the proceedings continue as if no notice of discontinuance had been given, but it does not affect the termination of orders regarding bail or custody. If the defendant has been released from custody following the discontinuance of the case under s.23, s/he cannot be detained if the proceedings are revived.\n\nUnless circumstances have radically changed since the notice of discontinuance was issued, the reviewing lawyer will formally offer no evidence in court.\n\nAll being well, your friend could receive a notice of discontinuance at some point.  He probably won't want to revive the proceedings!
388226
as many time as you can get away with it. it really depends.
327346
2 years.\nThere is no limit to how many times they can be re-elected.
924370
Yes and No.  It depend on what type of case you are testifying for.\nFor example, if it was a drug related case, and who you are testifying against, there is no limit.  As I said, depends on the case.
250247
There is a statute to limitations, and in most states it's 7 years. Meaning after 7 years it's too late to file a claim against you.
500521
Yes you can.\n\nThe prosecutor can take the case to the grand jury over and over again, then use a preliminary hearing the the grand jury votes no true bill. Your lawyer can tell the judge at your arraignment hearing the case has been dismissed before and that will go a long way toward rolling it again. Good luck.
250329
If you were found not guilty by a judge or jury, the only way to retry the case would be if significant new evidence was found, or, like with OJ, a civil trial to assess culpability and possible damages.
145208
It happens from time to time, just try back again later.
609461
Depends on how many times you get wrote up for it.
485024
Yes, it can re-occur.Talk to a surgeon.
1091901
I think it's called double jeopardy.....You can't be tried for the same thing twice.......
1075675
as with all law related questions, a nice bit of info would be which countrys law you want advice on.\n\nWhen did she get convicted? Was that 5 years ago? or was the offense 5years ago?\n\n(I'm working on the UK legal system)\nAssuming that the conviction was 5 years ago, I still dont think its too late. I dont believe there to be limitation on time for an appeal to be brought. The appeal would have to be approved by the DPP (director of public prosecutions) who is only likely to approve it after that amount of time based on new and compelling evidence. The reason i dont think there is a time period for an appeal is because the criminal offenses worth appealing against are recordable crimes, and there is always a need to clear somebodys name if new evidence can do so. Either way you will need a lawyer to do so, so i suggest getting professional advice as you will need to go through a lawyer to make the appeal anyway.
120095
One can usually appeal it once on both sides.