how was the u-2 incident resolved?
814795
click here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U-2_Crisis_of_1960
1005576
I think we owed it to them to give them a chance to get their act together peacefully when we took the lid off of the pressure cooker.\n\nHowever, I don't think we are supposed to become a new lid on a new pressure cooker.  Imbalances of power were created under the old regime and it may be that those can't be sorted out peacefully.  At some point, it becomes their problem.\n\nHowever, if we had known they would have this much trouble sorting themselves out peacefully, I think many of us would have had a different opinion about going in to begin with.
1025566
What were we supposed to do, deploy a military we had all but dismantled.\n\nHell, we didn't leave Georgie boy enough spare parts to fix a flat and he took all the blame (another slick move, don't you think?)
377306
It was faught on the Aleutian Islands in Alaska.  A Japanese submarine was engaged and sunk by the Navy.  There were run-ins with both German and Japanese subs off of coast in the Atlantic and Pacific, but no battles on land
340494
The US learned that their actions could cause wrong interpretations by the Soviets, example: \n\nUS destroyers were dropping signaling depth charges on a Soviet submarine near the quarantine line, intending to force it to surface. Unbeknownst to the US Navy, it was carrying a nuclear-tipped torpedo. The captain lost his temper.  The oxygen supply dropped in the sub and as temperatures rose to 120 degrees, some sailors fainted.\nVadim Pavlovich Orlov, an intelligence officer said the bombardment was like "sitting in a metal barrel, which somebody is constantly blasting with a sledgehammer.... But we were still holding on, trying to escape. We were suffering like this for about four hours."\n\nThe sub's commander, Valentin Savitsky, who could not communicate with the Soviet general staff, thought a nuclear war may have started up above. He ordered an officer to assemble the nuclear-tipped torpedo and prepare it to be fired.\n\nBut Second Captain Vasili Alexandrovich Arkhipov told Savitsky that the conditions for firing the torpedo, a rupture of the hull, had not occurred. Savitsky reversed his order and the submarine surfaced.  Nuclear war was averted thanks to the actions of a subordinate officer.\n\nThe outcome of this event, after it became known on the American military on how close they came to nuclear war was to change its policies regarding military confrontations, ie from now on they would take into account the possibility that the Soviets might interpret their actions as a cause for a nuclear response.
623186
5:00 A.M.\nBierko’s men flush out the Sentox gas aboard the sub Natalia. Bierko instructs them to begin the launch countdown. They are targeting high population areas to punish the Americans for allying with Moscow.\n\n5:01 A.M.\nAudrey contacts Admiral Kirkland at the Point Mugu Command Center to alert him that terrorists have seized control of the Natalia submarine. All of the Navy crew onboard dead. She asks him to sink the Natalia with his F-18 fighter planes. Yet they won’t be there in time before the missiles launch.\n\n5:02 A.M.\nJack, Henderson and the TAC team are at the dock of the Natalia. Since backup won’t get there in time, Jack will have to stop Bierko himself. Henderson notices a signal tube launching off the side, which indicates someone on board is trying to send a distress signal. \n\n5:03 A.M.\nHenderson tells Jack that he won’t go on the sub unless he gets his own gun for protection. Distrusting Henderson, Jack is hesitant to give him a weapon.\n\n5:06 A.M.\nChloe scans the area around the sub for emergency frequencies and finds one coming from a survivor. She patches Jack to Rooney, a petty officer engineer aboard the sub. Rooney gives his location, and Jack has him go to an entry point where they can board. Rooney will have to kill the terrorist at that post to go unseen.\n\n5:08 A.M.\nHenderson demands a gun, and Jack gives it to him. They head towards the sub.\n\n5:09 A.M.\nNovick briefs Logan about Bierko raiding the submarine and taking over its missiles. \n\nFrom outside the conference room, Martha watches Logan in the midst of the crisis. She calls Pierce and warns him not to remove the body from the retreat until she talks to Novick. \n\n5:10 A.M.\nWith less than ten minutes to missile launch, Jack asks Henderson how long it will take him to shut the system down.\n\n5:11 A.M.\nJack instructs Rooney on how to slit the throat of the terrorist guarding the door. Rooney clumsily attacks the man and kills him. He radios Jack that their entry is clear. Jack shoots the guard on the deck, and the TAC team runs to the top of the sub.\n\n5:12 A.M.\nThe missile doors open up on the top of the sub in preparation to launch. \n\n5:13 A.M.\nJack and Henderson board the sub and meet Rooney. He shows them where the control room is, and Jack has him access it from the other side to create a distraction. \n\n5:14 A.M.\nRooney knocks over a tool cart, causing a loud noise. Bierko leaves the control room to investigate. Jack and his team go in the control room and see one man left to arm the missiles. Jack stabs him in the throat. \n\n5:17 A.M.\nHenderson gets to work on the controls, manually reversing the launch codes. Jack goes after Bierko.\n\n5:18 A.M.\nJack fires at one of Bierko’s men. Chloe warns him that they have sixty seconds until launch. Henderson works as fast as he can. \n\n5:19 A.M.\nThe other terrorist knocks Jack’s gun down. Jack grabs him and uses the man’s arm to fire at Bierko. Jack shoots at a pipe that releases steam, and he presses the man’s face to the burning pipe. Jack is set free from his grip. Bierko smacks Jack in the forehead with a metal tool. Jack leaps to a pipe above and uses his legs to snap Bierko’s neck. Henderson is able to dismantle the missiles. Everyone at CTU sighs in relief, and Karen has Chloe call off the F-18 planes.\n\n5:20 A.M.\nJack returns to the control room, but Henderson is gone. He tells CTU to take him off of radio and he runs outside on the deck to look for Henderson. Henderson comes up behind Jack and makes him drop his weapon. “You weren’t ever really gonna let me go, were you?” Henderson asks. He pulls the trigger and the gun clicks. Henderson realizes he’s been had, and he removes the empty clip from his gun. Jack accuses him of killing his friends Palmer, Tony and Michelle. Then he shoots Henderson dead. Rooney comes out and is frightened when he sees what Jack has done. \n\n5:27 A.M.\nMilitary transport vehicles arrive at the dock
378398
big trouble\n\nit made fun of air port security and how infective it was\nthe people walked through the security check with a nuke in plain sight
937128
The one about them overtaking the plane that landed in the Pennsylvania field is Flight 93. At least I'm pretty sure. They shouldn't make a United 93 and a Flight 93. It's really confusing.
391649
Most of the "crisis" was unknown to the people or the world for a few days. The after effects: the people of SU was not happy with the outcome, bc they did not know it was a deal between JFK and NK. The US took missiles out of Turkey and the SU took missiles out of Cuba. The world only knew of the actions of the SU-not the US.
236010
Accoding to accounts I have read, they were conducting a test of certain safety systems, which were supposed to shut things down in the event of a catastrophic failure. So they shut off certain other safety systems that would have tripped earlier, and went ahead with the test. The systems they were testing failed to work, so nothing shut it off. The reactor went critical, a lot of water was broken down into hydrogen and oxygen, which built up as an explosive mixture inside the containment vessel, and you know the rest of the story.
830217
Try checking the archives of the Washington newspapers to find out what happened.\n\nYou will need a date for the incident tho or use the on-line newspaper search facility.
105130
They say they are pursuing nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, our government says they are trying to build a bomb.  Given the track record of the parties on both sides of this issue I couldn't begin to guess who's telling the truth.\n\nThe most important issue here is that it must be resolved by diplomatic means.  I sincerely hope that Iraq has taught this administration that a military solultion is NO solution.
743668
Hope this helps...\n\nhttp://www.959theranch.com/news/?news_id=151
734947
Well in my opinion there is no such procedure.\n\nSometimes a situation may arise that only one nation is against a resolution passed by all other members. This creates a rift in EU and the decision making process is affected. Recently Poland was the only nation against a resolution pending in EU regarding relations with Russia. The overwhelming majority in favour of the resolution seems helpless against the vote of one nation. \nIn this situation how will the EU work.
156399
it's already been resolved...
405730
Solution?\n\nKill all of the pacifists.\n\nOnce it's only a matter of force, the bullies dry up and blow away.\n\nNot gonna happen, so we're stuck with negotiations on one end and military force on the other.\n\nThank you for your time.
108448
This is one of those nutty conspiracy theories.  The satellite photo was takeng the day after the attacks.  It doesn't show much of anything that you can distiguish in any detail.  For all we know, they could have hauled debris away that might have hampered rescue efforts.  Who knows how much of the debris might be in the building?\n\nThe second photo was taken 3 days after the attacks.  Again, debris could have been removed to safety reaons, etc. And it isn't a vgood picture.  Debris could be in areas not shown on the photo like the courtyard area.\n\nThen of course there is the security tape showing the crash.  There is nothing new here, this is just someone who has too much time on their hands.\n\nAdded:\n\nYour question was "try this out and comment".  You posted a link to inconclusive photos that could be interpreted any number of ways.  You try to point to some vague conspiracy and a cover up with no supporting evidence.  How do you think people are supposed to react?  You ask where the wreckage is and I provide a number of plausible explanations that you chose not to ignore and not to analyze.