how did the scientist of the big bang theory  make the star  or what ever & who made the scientist?
818241
But we do know that religion makes people ignorant.
636967
Stars are huge, very, very hot balls of gas that shine brightly. Stars like all other matter is made up of millions of atoms. The simplest and lightest element is hydrogen gas. Enormous clouds of hydrogen gas and dust particles form in space. Gravity draws the dust and gas close together forming a huge clump, or mass.\n\nAs more and more matter is added to the mass, its gravity increases. This pushes the atoms of hydrogen gas closer and closer together. The mass begins to contract, or get smaller. It also gets denser and hotter. The center is hottest of all because the atoms are being squeezed together. The heat creates tremendous energy. Energy is the power necessary to make things happen.\n\nFinally, the crowding of the atoms, the heat, and the violent energy forces the hydrogen atoms to combine. This makes a new and heavier element called helium. The change of hydrogen gas to helium gas is called thermonuclear fusion. When this happens a star is born.\n\nTherefore , stars appear to be circular in shape because of the gravitational pull the mass exerts from all sides. It attracts hydrogen and dust particles with equal force from all sides and hence from a distance when we look at a star , it appears like a shining ball to us. When the Helium gas reaction takes place , it still appears cirular to us since the gravitational pull inside the star holds it together with equal force in all directions. \n\nThroughout a star's life, thermonuclear fusion goes on in its core, creating enormous energy. That energy becomes light and heat. It makes the star shine.\n\nThe new star will shine in the heavens for billions of years. It will stay that way until all its hydrogen gas has changed to helium.\n\nWhen a star has finally turned all its hydrogen into helium it is nearing the end of its life. Scientists believe that the amount of mass left in the dead star determines what will become of it.\n\nWhen a star has finally turned all its hydrogen into helium it is nearing the end of its life. Scientists believe that the amount of mass left in the dead star determines what will become of it.\n\nWhen an even bigger star — a giant star — uses up all its energy, it collapses even more than a white dwarf. Its mass and gravity are much greater. No space is left between the atoms. Electrons and protons inside the atoms are pushed together. They become neutrons and the giant star shrinks to a very small size. It is called a "neutron star" and is usually only a few kilometers in diameter. But its mass is so great that a tiny bit of neutron star — less than a teaspoonful — would weigh about half a trillion kilograms. That's as much as a long freight train loaded with bricks!\n\nSometimes, when a giant star collapses, particles called neutrinos are forced out of the atoms. As the neutrinos burst forth from the dying star, the star shines more brightly than any other object in the galaxy. It looks like an enormous sparkler. This is a "supernova."\n\nWhen the amount of mass left in a dying star is three or more times the mass of the sun, something very mysterious happens. A star this massive shrinks much faster than the white dwarf and the neutron star. Its force of gravity is very great. Nothing can escape it — not even light, which moves faster than anything else in the universe. This star becomes a "black hole."\n\nMany astrophysicists believe that there are black holes at the center of most galaxies, including our Milky Way. Although that may be so, our solar system is too far removed from the black hole for us to be influenced by its pull of gravity.\n\nAnother popular belief about black holes is that it can be a very vital tool in time travel\n\nCheck these links :) very interesting :) \n\nhttp://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/q285.html\nhttp://science.howstuffworks.com/time-travel3.htm
737882
Agostine Monk and Abbot, Gregor Mendel, did more to advance the science of change and evolution with his plant studies.  He's considered the Father of Genetics.  He actually made "intellgent design" in plants possible.\n\nThen there's Father Georges-Henri Lemaître a Roman Catholic priest, honorary prelate, professor of physics and astronomer.  He gave us the Big Bang theory.\n\nIsn't it funny how the actually scientific theories are conjured up by Religious Priests.
44696
While Wikipedia rightfully gives credit for the idea to Georges Lemaître, his idea was built on the work of other great scientists of his time. Einstein's general theory of relativity was the foundation for work done by  Alexander Friedmann prior to Lemaître's work. Freidmann proposed with mathematical equations that the universe was expanding. After Lemaître proposed his ideas Hubble provided the proof that was needed. Many cosmologists actually give the credit for the Big Bang theory to Hubble. \nhttp://www.umich.edu/~gs265/bigbang.htm\nHowever, many other scientists deserve significant credit for later providing more proof and evidence to support and modify the original theory. Although it is widely accepted today, there are alternative scientific theories that have not been completely dismissed. One of these was proposed in 1993 based on observations of the accelerating universe. This quasi-steady-state theory is not well accepted, but is an example of how the Big Bang Theory is being constantly tested and re-examined by science as new evidence is found.
139933
Probably Rocket scientist, and balistics expert.  Other ones would be physicist or physical scientist.  Oh and if your talking equations, well anything with force.
27023
My understanding is that the Creator organized his being from some huge pre-universal black hole from which The All spoke (Big Bang) and created Motion (the Creator).\n\nSince the Motion was outward and forward, thus positive, it was called He and Him.
149583
Astronomer - the scince is Astronomy
226760
Once upon a time, a person upon the earth looked at the stars and "wondered" about the same question you're asking. They didn't have any tools except their eyes, but they were so fascinated that they begin to ask other questions.  The questions were simple at first like "What are those white things up there?"  Why are there different sizes of the objects?"  "Why do some seem to move while others seem to stand still" etc."  \n\nThey began to discuss it with others and ideas began to bounce around among interested people.  Some begin to organize the various thoughts and ideas into systematic units; some began to invent tools such as mathematics and pattern analysis, telescopes, and theories, etc.\n\nAnd they taught them to their successors who continued to ask questions and build on the knowledge and techniques and tools until today, we know a lot more than that person who first said "I wonder....".  The by-products of all that 'wondering" have led to modern learning techniques, verbal communication skills, etc. and happier, fuller, lives than ever before.\n\nThe study of the humongous universe quickly led others to study more and more miniscule things:  atoms, quarks, particles.  Today, thanks to all those who have "wondered", \nwe have a pretty good idea how the universe as we know came into being.  Many theories are still being studied and the final answer has yet to be discussed.  If you really want to WONDER, ask a physicist what he knows about what happened just prior to what is called "the Big Bang".
92532
The big bang; the theory that the solar system was created by a large explosion of dust and gas. The dust and gas was pulled together over many years by gravity and formed the planets.
328774
Science is based on finding physical evidence in the universe, not on idle speculation.\n\nSince the results of the Big Bang are strewn across the sky, it is possible for science to use what we see to deduce what the universe was like at the time of the Big Bang.  However, due to the violent forces involved at that time, finding physical evidence of what reality was like BEFORE then is extremely difficult.  No one has yet devised a way to do it.\n\nThat means any ideas about what it was like before the Big Bang (including whether "God did it" or not) are idle speculation and not science.  As such, they should be taken back to the religion forum.
875292
Hubble discovered expansion...sort of. He proposed it as a theory but it was a colleague who did the math and proved it. I can't remember the colleague's name.
205330
The Big Bang Theory has not been proven. Don't believe every piece of hype that you read. Many predictions of BB and related theories have been verified. Many others have been contradicted. Same with some ID and Creation theories. Some have been verified, some have been contradicted. Many evidences claimed to support a billions-years-old universe also support other explanations. Usually it's just a matter of premises.
1090100
This can be answered very, very simply.\n\nRelativity works well in  in it's area of expertise, astronomy and space science.  Basically, the scientists took the answers (how the planets revolve around the Sun, the Mass of the planets and stars, how the stars and galaxies move) and created an elegant series of equations to explain them all.  They believed their equations to be correct because this is what they were observing, so it must be true right?\n\nWell no, as we built better telescopes we began witnessing objects and entire galaxies moving far too fast for their observed mass, defying the equations and defying gravity!  It wasn't light pressure robbing these celestial objects of a few arc seconds, which is what sprung Einstein to whop up Relativity.  Venus was so much of a mystery, but Einstein cracked it, right?\n\nWRONG!  If the atom doesn't fit, you must aquit!  Electromagnetic forces have been known to cause these very same effects we witness the galaxies doing.  If the astronomers can't explain something they see, they blame it on magnetics.  Double-helix galaxies, just like our DNA, are floating around out there.  That should tell you where you should start looking to explain the molecular and Universal connection.\n\nVenus' orbit is nearly a perfect circle, and it spins the other direction very slowly.  It used to be called the hairy planet, the smoky planet, and bearded planet.  It's latin name means morning star.  It was literally glowing!  I'm sure some electromagnetic stuff was going on with it, and that would help explain it's brand spanking new surface.\n\nhttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuzSsKSIJO_WapqWQB7tQcPsy6IX?qid=20060612222952AAFdmeo\n\nMars got blown the hell up.  That's a start on finding out about it right there, google should take you the rest of the way.  Hope this helped you understand why those two theories will never be united.  One of them, relativity, was based on a few wrong assumptions.
504884
Sorry, but Baird invented TV\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Logie_Baird\n\nVon Braun was a rocket scientist born in Poland and "assisted" the Nazi's before going on to work in the USA for the military and NASA.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_braun
588112
Just check this link and go thru the following article also\n\nhttp://www.big-bang-theory.com/\n\nBig Bang Theory - The Premise\nThe Big Bang theory is an effort to explain what happened at the very beginning of our universe. Discoveries in astronomy and physics have shown beyond a reasonable doubt that our universe did in fact have a beginning. Prior to that moment there was nothing; during and after that moment there was something: our universe. The big bang theory is an effort to explain what happened during and after that moment. \n\nAccording to the standard theory, our universe sprang into existence as "singularity" around 13.7 billion years ago. What is a "singularity" and where does it come from? Well, to be honest, we don't know for sure. Singularities are zones which defy our current understanding of physics. They are thought to exist at the core of "black holes." Black holes are areas of intense gravitational pressure. The pressure is thought to be so intense that finite matter is actually squished into infinite density (a mathematical concept which truly boggles the mind). These zones of infinite density are called "singularities." Our universe is thought to have begun as an infinitesimally small, infinitely hot, infinitely dense, something - a singularity. Where did it come from? We don't know. Why did it appear? We don't know. \n\nAfter its initial appearance, it apparently inflated (the "Big Bang"), expanded and cooled, going from very, very small and very, very hot, to the size and temperature of our current universe. It continues to expand and cool to this day and we are inside of it: incredible creatures living on a unique planet, circling a beautiful star clustered together with several hundred billion other stars in a galaxy soaring through the cosmos, all of which is inside of an expanding universe that began as an infinitesimal singularity which appeared out of nowhere for reasons unknown. This is the Big Bang theory. \n\nBig Bang Theory - Common Misconceptions\nThere are many misconceptions surrounding the Big Bang theory. For example, we tend to imagine a giant explosion. Experts however say that there was no explosion; there was (and continues to be) an expansion. Rather than imagining a balloon popping and releasing its contents, imagine a balloon expanding: an infinitesimally small balloon expanding to the size of our current universe. \n\nAnother misconception is that we tend to image the singularity as a little fireball appearing somewhere in space. According to the many experts however, space didn't exist prior to the Big Bang. Back in the late '60s and early '70s, when men first walked upon the moon, "three British astrophysicists, Steven Hawking, George Ellis, and Roger Penrose turned their attention to the Theory of Relativity and its implications regarding our notions of time. In 1968 and 1970, they published papers in which they extended Einstein's Theory of General Relativity to include measurements of time and space.1, 2 According to their calculations, time and space had a finite beginning that corresponded to the origin of matter and energy."3 The singularity didn't appear in space; rather, space began inside of the singularity. Prior to the singularity, nothing existed, not space, time, matter, or energy - nothing. So where and in what did the singularity appear if not in space? We don't know. We don't know where it came from, why it's here, or even where it is. All we really know is that we are inside of it and at one time it didn't exist and neither did we. \n\nBig Bang Theory - Evidence for the Theory\nWhat are the major evidences which support the Big Bang theory? \n\nFirst of all, we are reasonably certain that the universe had a beginning. \nSecond, galaxies appear to be moving away from us at speeds proportional to their distance. This is called "Hubble's Law,"
559307
Check the following links, they'll answer a lot of your questions, especially those related to Hubble, the big bang and time.\n\nFollow the links in the stories for addl. info.
409220
big bang didnt produced planets. it produced gases and small particles. when the gases started concentrating at a point in space, they experienced huge forces of gravity. and thus got molded in a shape which offers minimum volume(SPHERE).