is ones personality atributted to nature or nurture?
826843
A little of both.  Nuture from environment and exposure to culture.  Nature from the chemical balances in the brain, natural and unnatural.
435612
I think you meant genetic and psychological.\n\nIt's not neccessarily either. I believe you are just born that way, so if anything, genetic.
689637
I have personality, can't you tell?
117975
Looks (which are deceiving) are a mixture of both parents.\nMy mind and discipline are like my father’s.\nMy heart and patience are like my mother’s.
1138007
Personality:  happy, fun-loving attitude; positive outlook on life.\n\nPhysical:  Eyes, smile, curves without anything too out-of-proportion.
366392
yes,but it differs from the  way your looking for a personality,like behaviour,body,attitude & knowledge.\nif your intersted to more about the person,you must have to know, that person must have these qualities.but i am  not clear about what kind of personalities you mean
731680
I've always been a type A personality which could often make for an interesting dilemma for an introverted trait.  Now, I'm still A but I like to slide into B and hang out a lot more.  Good question & thanks for asking!  :)
226962
Although this is my personal opinion I believe that our inherent psyche is preprogrammed for survival.\nThis tends to afford the motivation for life.\nThis is my theory of natural selection or survival of the fittest.  Jose
7022
Wow, that is a LOADED question. There are numerous variables the determin psychological responses in any species. Fear would be an emotional variable and environment would be physical variables (cold, wet, hot, ect.). Try to be a little more specific. ANYHOW, time for this question to finally end! Vote!
613414
Both. Your genetic makeup will determine a large number of factors in your makeup/development. Environment also plays a large role. If you look at the studies on identical twins, you'll see that they are extraordinarily similar for the first few years, but then start developing differences. These variations won't be physical, since those are genetic, but more behavioral.
765081
It is a characteristic of the organism, made by nature.
366675
TRAITS \nPersonal Characteristics, things about you such as eye-color, skin color and blood-type that are special.\n\n\nINHERITED \nTraits passed down from your parents. (Traits that you were born with.)\n\n\nACQUIRED \nTraits such as pierced ears, hair length, scars, etc. that you were not born with.
648856
Most often it is an inborn characteristic and is a combination of characteristics that people find atttractive.\nIt can be developed but the whole point of the charisma of a person is its naturalness.
878053
Gender traits, are they  learned or are they hereditary?
1072964
I have always believed it was more nature than nurture.  Too many things didn't fit the nurture.  Too many people from different backgrounds end up gay.  \n\nAngeltress:  Many genetic traits are only passed on by the mother and never the father.  Just because gay people don't procreate doesn't mean that the genetic information doesn't make it to the next generation.  The best example I can think of is Leebers Disease.  It is a genetic disorder that causes blindness in males and insanity in females.  It is never passed from a male to an offspring and is always passed from the mother.  This disorder is more rare than homosexuality, however the gene that causes it continues to be passed to next generations.\nAs long as somebody is procreating, the genetic information is passed to the next generation.  Same for homosexuality.  The recessive trait is there...  being passed on...  but doesn't require gay people to pass it on...  even though many gay people have children who grow up to have their own children.\n\nThe question I have now is will Christians begin aborting the little abominations in their womb so that they don't have to raise a child hated by god, or will they continue to have them, mess up their minds by trying to change them, then throw them our into a sorry world to fend for themselves like they have been doing for generations...
463288
In adoption studies, psychologists studied how much children's IQ was related to their parents. For example, was the biological child's IQ closer to their parent than the adopted child to their new parent? They found that biological children have a closer IQ to their biological parents than do adopted children to their new parent. So that means that nature must have played more of an important role than nurture. However, when the adopted child came from an impoverished environment and was put in a better home with better parents, their IQ increased dramatically, which means that nurture still plays a great role in influencing a child's IQ.\n\nThe types of twins are fraternal or identical.\n\nThe nature vs. Nurture debate is about whether you become the person you are because of (nature) biological factors (meaning you are born with a certain IQ and certain characteristics that you inherited from your parents and cannot change) or because of (nurture) environmental factors such as how your parents raised you, if you were in an abusive or good home, etc.
814044
It is sort of complicated... at least; in my opinion it does. For example, when I was younger I knew that I was not like every other male, but now that I am older I know for a fact that I am who I am. A homosexual. When I was younger I dated several female friends whom I still keep in contact with now... \n\nThat question "Nature or Nurture?" is hard. I believe that people are born the way that they are born, but grow up to be who they are. \n\nA path was chosen, but from then on we make ourselves out to who we choose to be... I hope my answer helps you on your paper dear... Email me anytime.