how do I analyze this sentence: I'm afraid we see things differently. ?
827464
Somone is politely telling you that you are wrong.\nThe "I'm afraid" is merely social convention and has no real meaning: the speaker is not truly remorseful that he is correct and you are wrong. He is simply pretending (in a superficial and insincere way) to feel some sadness that he is unable to bring you to a correct opinion.\nThe "we see things differently" means simply "I am right and you are not." No one intentionally maintains a viewpoint that they believe to be incorrect, so the speaker believes that his point of view is the right one. QED.\nHope that helps.
1096050
Because people interpret things differently
828635
Fear of the unknown.\n\n*(*
219215
If it's a compount sentance...\n\nExample:\n\nI'll run for help, you get the fire hose!\n\nThe subjects are 'I' and 'you' with an implied 'and' conjunction (but not really).  The compound predicates are 'run' and 'get'...   So... there you go.\n\nThis isn't two sentences, it's a compound sentece.  (I guess the case could be made that it should be two sentences.)  Keep in mind that I was trying to make a compound sentence with two non-conjunctionated (like my made up word?) subjects.  Really you would say soemthing like "Go get help and I'll grab the hose" which WOULD have a conjunction.
627754
Hey, hows about this?\n\nA day in the life of a tree\n\nImagine that trees could see things. Imagine what a tree would see in 24 hours. A domestic argument, friendships formed and broken...\n\nA simple idea but you could make it brilliant. Maybe I'm being nuts but better than an elaborate idea that has been done to death.
570500
They all already ARE grammatically correct... they just sound a bit formal.\n\nOther ways to write the sentences:\n\n1. He doesn't think piano lessons in the garden are unusual anymore.\n\n2. His love of singing and dancing helps him make connection with his friends.\n\n3. Everyone was surprised when the animals to react violently to the treatment.\n\n4.  No one is surprised in today's time to see them playing with their archenemies.
860168
To me it says that the person has seen something (or maybe even heard something) that they wish they hadn't.  Something very emotionally overwhelming.
154644
This phrase refers to looking back at what has happened in the past and everything seems to be clear (like perfect vision or eyesight which is 20/20).  Things make sense only after they have happened.  You have the benefit of seeing what happened at the beginning, middle, and end only after time has passed.  You can't go back and change things, but at least you have knowledge now about what could happen in the future for similar events.  The phrase is usually used in reference to something bad that happened or a missed opportunity, that had you known what you now know, you would have done things differently.
208224
She is a shrinking violet\n\nShe is midnight's morning glory (I just made that up, but you can use it, haha)\n\nHmmm... shy in what way?\n\nAnyway, metaphors compare someone to something WITHOUT using like or as.
777591
Please learn to compose a sentence that makes sense.
1120288
There are two possibilities here:\n\n1) "That joke went over my head"  - you didn't understand it.\n\n2) "I'm in over my head" - you have gotten into a situation that you can't handle.
414921
Sentence number 2 is correct.\n\nThe reason sentence 1 is not correct is because it has a dangling participle. In other words, the participle cannot distinguish what it wants to describe. \n\nIt could be that you realize how much different you have been than before (like in sentence 2)\nOR------\nit could be that you realize how FREQUENTLY you have been different than before.\n\nIf you read sentence 1, you will realize that both senerios could be true. \n\nHope this helps\nThanks\nJon
1014071
The 2nd sentence is correct and very formal; there is something like an old subjunctive form hidden in it.\nThe 1st sentence is (informally) not incorrect and could be found in British English.
209105
The outward and visible sign of an inward fear.\n\nHe saw a ghost.\nIt occupied — that dismal thing! —\nThe path that he was following.\nBefore he'd time to stop and fly,\nAn earthquake trifled with the eye\nThat saw a ghost.\nHe fell as fall the early good;\nUnmoved that awful vision stood.\nThe stars that danced before his ken\nHe wildly brushed away, and then\nHe saw a post.\n—Jared Macphester\n\nAccounting for the uncommon behavior of ghosts, Heine mentions somebody's ingenious theory to the effect that they are as much afraid of us as we of them. Not quite, if I may judge from such tables of comparative speed as I am able to compile from memories of my own experience.\n\nThere is one insuperable obstacle to a belief in ghosts. A ghost never comes naked: he appears either in a winding-sheet or "in his habit as he lived." To believe in him, then, is to believe that not only have the dead the power to make themselves visible after there is nothing left of them, but that the same power inheres in textile fabrics. Supposing the products of the loom to have this ability, what object would they have in exercising it? And why does not the apparition of a suit of clothes sometimes walk abroad without a ghost in it? These be riddles of significance. They reach away down and get a convulsive grip on the very tap-root of this flourishing faith.
208429
My wife and child are moving to a different city.  I am moving to yet another city.  \nI am going to be homeless again after many years.  \nI have more debt then money.  \nA very serious entity has destroyed me and my life and I am in the process of rectifying things.\nMy life has been a poorly written movie and it just got worse.
753125
Dunno where you got this sentence from, but I can only make sense of it if I assume that there's a typing error and the writer means 'carrier' not 'barrier,' where 'carrier' is a method of transport (car, truck, plane, etc.).\n\nIn that case the sentence might be better written as:\n\n'Whether or not distance is related to the available means of transport is not clear, because only the most important carrier could be chosen.' \n\nWhoever wrote that should be taken out and shot. Hope I guessed right.
404631
Well... what is the context of the sentence?\n\nIs that a statement or part of a description?\n\nBecause if it said "John and Paul were strangers, yet to be friends" it makes sense.\n\nOn the other hand, if that sentence is meant to stand alone as a statement, then some of the answers are right. It should be "Strangers are yet to be friends".\n\nNow, if you're asking for the meaning of it, like others said... all friends were once strangers because they didn't know each other. So, at some point in time, in the past, they were strangers that would become friends.\n\nHope this helped!