What is a nobel prize?
825919
A prize given to some great guy for doing something great to make them feel good. Nobel prizes are overrated...
724229
Here's a great website with pictures of the various nobel gases in lamps so you can see their glows and describe them yourself.\n\nhttp://www.assumption.edu/users/bniece/Spectra/Complete.html
1009304
Thats a good question. I think an experiment is in order.\n\n1. Sow a bunch of pennies in the middle of a busy street.\n2. Wait the see who picks it up.\n3. Count the number of people of picks it up and not get hit by a car versus the number of people of picks it up AND get hit by a car.\n4. Prepare to receive the Nobel Prize.\n\nYaya!
1186097
Scroll down to the National Award winners.\n\nhttp://www.chemistry.org/portal/a/c/s/1/acsdisplay.html?DOC=awards&#92;index.html
352633
From the Nobel Prizes : http://nobelprize.org/literature/laureates/1983/golding-bio.html\n\nBooks and Writers :\nhttp://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/wgolding.htm\n\nOfficial home page : http://www.william-golding.co.uk/
475781
Taking  by Birth or Citizenship into consideration Total 7.\n\nAmartya Sen - 1998 Nobel prize winner for contributions to welfare economics\n\nChandrasekhara Venkata Raman - Physicist acclaimed for his work on radiation effect, famously known as Sir CV Raman.\n\nMother Teresa - Christian missionary and winner of the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979\n\nRabindranath Tagore - Eminent Bengali literary figure. Winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1913\n\nSubramanyan Chandrasekhar - Winner of Physics Nobel Prize,Physicist acclaimed for his work on Black Holes\n\nVS Naipaul - Winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2001\n\n1968 Dr. Hargobind Khurana Medicine - Genetic Code
270758
she is a scientist in physics who had a noble prize
722751
That's not renewable. You just demonstrated that perpetual motion is feasible! Hello Nobel! Can I get in on this?
975175
Yeh, interesting question.  Here is a good response, taken from the Boston Globe:\n\nSort of, but as is so often the case, it's a little more subtle than a simple yes/no answer.\n\nEinstein did receive the Nobel prize in physics in 1921, and the actual citation from the Nobel committee was ''for services to Theoretical Physics, and especially of the law of the photoelectric effect."\n\nDuring 1905 alone Einstein probably made enough scientific leaps to justify three Nobel prizes, writing several papers that would change the world. Certainly the case could be made that he should have had several more for work done afterward, but most people like to think of that year as ''the big one" that made certain he would get a Nobel prize no matter what.\n\nOne 1905 paper dealt with the ''photoelectric effect" and is the work that was clearly cited for the prize. In this work he showed that, although most scientists believed light acted like a wave, one must also at times treat light as being made of little chunks of electromagnetic energy called photons. This was the beginning of the strange subject of quantum mechanics which made it essential to drop many preconceived notions of what made sense in order to really understand how the world worked.\n\nAnother paper of 1905 introduced Einstein's special theory of relativity (special in that it could not deal with acceleration, but only with constant velocity's) and introduced the radical idea of merging space and time into one thing: space-time.\n\nYet another 1905 paper showed that one could infer the existence of atoms -- something still controversial at the time -- by looking at the random motion of grains of pollen in a drop of water.\n\nEinstein kept working to develop his general theory of relativity, which extended the special theory to include acceleration and gravity, but this took a bit of time to get sorted out -- it was published in 1915 and introduced the idea of curved space-time.\n\nThis list of achievements is nowhere near complete, but space restrictions make me stop here.\n\nMany people feel that the Nobel committee wanted to hedge its bets a bit by just picking out just one of the mind-blasting 1905 breakthroughs (which were all still controversial 15 years later) and lumping the rest together as ''Theoretical Physics." Oddly enough, it's the ideas of quantum mechanics, ushered in by the Nobel-cited photoelectric effect paper, that are perhaps the most controversial today!
288190
Ede Teller, a Hungarian scientist who immigrated to the US. He died recently. I have almost forgotten to mention that he was awarded a Nobel Prize for peace.
721983
A local University (Public College, if you're not American) will probably yield you good & cheap results.  You won't be first in line for a Nobel Prize, but it's the most inexpensive higher education.  And any education you get will meet the mark of 99% of employers.
253298
The first woman to win a nobel price was:\n\n1905 Bertha Kinsky von Sutner became the first woman to win a Nobel Peace Prize. She had founded European pacifist organizations with her husband, Artur.\n\nThe First Woman to win in science:\n1911 Marie Curie won the Nobel Prize in Physics for the isolation of the elements polonium and radium.\n  \nfollowed by:\n  \nAlexis Carrel (b.1873), French surgeon and biologist, won a Nobel Prize for the development of blood vessel suture technique.
245008
I don't know, but Theodore Rosevelt was awareded an Nobel Prize for the treaty that ended the Russo Japanese war of 1905/
874388
It is the developing of technologies on the molecular scale in the field of biology. That's really the only way to describe it, I think. Why not look it up on wikipedia?
1105743
The link below lists all of the Nobel Prize winners from 1900 to 2005.\n\nThere are three prizes that are offered for "science" - chemistry, physics, and medicine.
26975
If somebody manages to answer you correctly with any concluding proof, be sure that he will win not only five stars but also a Nobel Prize!
1141362
Probably not\nThey have physics, literature, economics, peace, physiology and medicine and chemistry. Quotation from Wikipedia: There are several possible reasons why Nobel created no Prize for mathematics. Nobel's will speaks of prizes for those inventions or discoveries of greatest practical benefit to mankind, possibly having in mind practical rather than theoretical works.[6] Mathematics was not considered a practical science from which humanity could benefit (a key purpose for the Nobel Foundation).[citation needed]