Is this why Clinton was so much better than Bush?
825677
Yep, that is the difference.  It sounds perfect to me\n\nhave a nice night!
1014200
OBVIOUSLY, it's all clinton's fault. Bush couldn't POSSIBLY have fvcked anything up THIS bad, right? He's GAWD'S president, remember?
1010859
Clinton, and not because I hate Bush, but because\n\n1.The economy was better under Clinton\n2.There was less fear/actual terrorist attacks\n3.The country was fairly united\n4.Less division between parties\n5.Better education plan without No Child Left Behind\n6.Working on healthcare problems vs. working on changing the Consitiution\n7.Scandals had to do with sex, not money theft, conspiracy, and wiretapping...\n\nClinton wins, the only place people really hate him for is the affair and that was his private business, in reality almost all Presidents have affairs...
363231
clinton is idiot. bush is moron.
500195
bush stole that, Gore would have been a MUCH better president in every way, HANDS DOWN!
552725
While Bill Clinton did not receive 50% of the popular vote in either 1992 or 1996, he did win the plurality of the popular vote in both elections by a wide margin.\n\nGW Bush never won any election by margins that Bill Clinton saw and in fact didn't even win the popular vote in 2000.\n\nYes, I would vote for Bill Clinton if he were able to run again.  And I would vote for Hillary if she ran.  But I'd also vote for Condie Rice if she ran against almost anyone else but Hillary.
146351
Clinton was far more articulate. His lies actually made you think 'maybe he telling the truth'. I assume that because he was a lawyer and thats what they do best. Bush has a Business degree. Thats why he always seems to be trying to 'sell' us something.
142835
Bush ... he's so much younger ... heathier ... and fistier\n\n<Clinton has had 2 heart surgeries ... and has a wife that gives him the evil eye daily ... so he's not too healthy ... I even think Nancy Regan could take Clinton out today>
97474
Bush, most definately!!!!!!! This answer has nothing to do with the fact the I like Bush or that I am a diehard republican but the fact that......Clinton is a pig!!!!!!!
671326
I don't care what Clinton did in his personal life. It's none of my business like it's none of these others responding to this question. Clinton did his job...better than Bush. He had more sense than Bush too. When you see you're people getting killed left and right (Somalia) pull them motherf***ers out of there and get out of dodge. Makes common sense. You don't keep sending more in because of your stubbornness and pride to the i won't lose syndrome. You're going to lose the war and get thousands of families killed for no reason. I'd never vote for Bush any of them his cousin soon to be on the way in office either. I never voted for none of them and I'm glad I didn't. Thanks Bill Clinton for giving the economy it's best years since the 1980's. I can't say yeah, those were the good old days when this decade is over with. I never in my life had years were I said "I don't want to remember those years." until Bush came in office. As a black man, I know that Clinton if I were walking down the street he'd speak to me and probably have dinner with me. I doubt very seriously if i were by myself Bush would speak to me if he seen me on the street. Condeleeza Rice is just a front to make him not appear racist to the media. That's the only reason she got that high position. Yo, i'm out of here. All of this talk about bush is about to make me head for the trash can.(Going to Earl) I'm out man!
518265
A monkey would do better than bush.
654422
BILL CLINTON!  Even though he got a BJ in the oval office, he was still MUCH smarter then Bush!  I don't know anything about Henry Kissinger, so I can't help there.
965080
Actually, I disagree with the first two posts. Bush has had much more power during his term. If Clinton did half of the things Bush has done during his Presidency, Clinton would have been lynched.\n\nTo answer the question, IMO I would like to see a "smarter President" take office. And no, I don’t think any President should have the power to steal an election, send a country to war under false pretences and force their greedy agenda on the country they are supposed to serve.
231212
I am glad Bush is mortal.  He would be the God of Imbecility and War Crimes, other wise.  I see a lot less people died on Clinton's watch.  Considering the things Bush has done, he has a reason to look over his shoulder.
61207
This is kind of a lopp sided question as it is always easier to complain about whatever we currently have.  However in this case the answer would be George W. Bush.  I have read some of the answers that you have gotten and some are based on complete misconceptions.  Yes our economy was better under the Clinton Administration, however that was due to the fact that the things that Reagan did for the economy were finally bearing fruit.  By the end of the Clinton years we were back into recession that plagued the early Bush Administration.  Clinton campaigned in 1992 promising National Health Insurance, however in his 8 years as President was not even able to get it to the floor of Congress.  Clinton had Congress's approval for the same reasons as Bush did in 1998 to go to war with Iraq, yet he never followed through with it.  If we blame Bush for making mistakes in his reasons for going to war with Iraq, Congress and the President made the same mistake in 1998.  What seems to be a common thing for both the American Public as well as our Politicians is a short attention span and a short memory.  In retrospect most Americans now think of Nixon as being a good President as well as a great statesman, yet in 1974 he was the most hated man in history moving Hitler to number 2 for the first time in over thirty years.
467402
Definitely\n\nIt would be better than Bush
865379
Yes, but I also watched all of Clinton's speeches, I agree more with Bush but got a lot out of both Presidents speeches.