Is Bush going to be connected with the 9/11 controversy ?
831064
Radical islamic terrorists were responsible for 9/11. Not Bush.\n\nAnyone that says otherwise is a partisan a-hole.
537006
Here is a perfect example.  Check out page 3 of the report below.\n\nCompletely setting my political views aside if 9/11 hadn't happened there is no way that Bush would now be our president.\n\nThat being said I think whatever benefit he got from 9/11 has been eaten up in the last year or so.
713175
The Bush Administration hasn't taken responsibility for a damned thing. They blame Clinton for the present and their opposers for the future. Another terrorist attack would see the current president's approval soar. Hell, without 9/11 Bush might have lost the election, hmmm
631745
I feel that when 9/11 happened that I supported going to war to track down and capture the jerk that planned these attacks, Mr. Bin Laden.  And I was a strong supporter of that.  But now, the war is about something else and I don't support it.  I don't ever recall supporting the capturing of Saddam and taking over their country and building it up brand new.  I don't think it's our business, I realize that Saddam did horrible things to the people in his country, but the country was in better shape then than it is now.  The focus of our war is no longer about 9/11, it's about Bush's personal family issues, he's not doing this for the good of our country, he's doing it for himself.  I'm starting to feel that 9/11 was planned, I think that it was a conspiracy within our government, and that our President had a certain hidden agenda.
193272
Yes i do believe that the Bush administration was behind 9/11 !! Too much evidence pinpoints at Bush!\n\nEvidence refers that the WTC buildings 1,2 and 7 didn't collapse simply because of fire as told by the Bush admin. but because of pre-planted explosives!! \n\nNever before in history has a steel high rise building collapsed simply because of fire. On 9/11, by coincidence, three such buildings collapsed in ten to fifteen seconds, almost freefall speed. \n\nIn other words, if you dropped a brick from the top of the World Trade Center it would have taken about that time to hit the ground.\n\nFor further verification visit this website:\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6545313046180631815&q=contrary+9%2F11&pl=true\n\nI know that after you watch the video included on this website you will all believe that Bush was the one behind all this!
828751
More than likely a little of both. Mind you that would mean that there were 2 thoughts in his head at the same time so I rather doubt the first reason. Seriously though, of course Bush as leader of the Party campaigned for control , every president campaigns during mid-term elections. As far as his worrying about having his administration investigated, he believes he is right and lives by the Alfred E. Newman philosophy"What? Me worry?" All I hope is that at least now there are some checks in place and other voices(other than God) will be heard.
1090880
I don't know but I'll tell ya what... My immediate thought when they broke into videos on VH1 with the breaking news on 9/11 was 'OMG'. My second thought right on the heels of that was 'Bush is gonna use this to go after Saddam somehow.'
496082
I am a liberal. While I don't believe Bush planned 9/11, I do believe he ignored warnings about it.\n\nCIA agents met with bin Laden in July 2001 in a hospital where he could easily have been arrested.\nhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html\n\nAugust 6, 2001, presidential daily briefing entitled Bin Laden determined to strike in US. PBD indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.\n\nhttp://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/10/august6.memo/\n\nIn late July 2001, Egyptian intelligence received a report from an undercover agent in Afghanistan that "20 al-Qaeda members had slipped into the US and four of them had received flight training on Cessnas." They passed on the message to the CIA, fully expecting Washington to request information.\n\nhttp://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/102347/index.php\n\nDennis Hastert, Speaker of the House, and several other members of Congress refused to meet with FBI agents who wanted to tell what they knew about a planned terrorist attack on lower Manhattan. John Ashcroft's Dept. of Justice intervened. David Schippers, Chicago attorney and previous Clinton impeachment investigator, called several members of Congress (including Hastert) begging them to take testimony from the FBI agents before the terrorist act occurred. The agents were later threatened with prosecution by the DOJ if they went public with what they knew. \n\nSource-9/11 Commission Report\n\nOn the morning of 9/11, Sen. Bob Graham (head of Senate Intelligence Committee) and Rep. Porter Goss (head of House Intelligence Committee) had breakfast with General Mahmoud Ahmad, head of Pakistani Intelligence, who had earlier directed that $100,000 be wired to Mohamad Atta, terrorist ringleader. \n\nhttp://baltimorechronicle.com/media3_oct02.html\n\nWhat I'm saying is that although I don't believe he had a hand in it, he and his administration didn't try very hard to stop it, either.\n\nBy the way, I like your screen name. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like you're searching for the "truth", only spreading hatred.
151234
I have seen parts of it. to "bored", the reference to bush I think is the present president not the one voted out in 92. If you need more to think about check out "9/11 In Plane Sight" found in my sources.
989105
Just search Yahoo! Answers and you'll find plenty of people rehashing the same trash that's come out of the White House since we went to war. Even now that Bush has distanced himself from linking Iraq and 9/11, there are people who insist that there was a connection. \n\nBear in mind this was three years ago, but there was a poll that showed that Fox News viewers were at least 4 times as likely to be misinformed about the link between Iraq and 9/11.
667242
Its Simple, if George Bush is Sidious, then he wouldve been the mastermind behind the 9-11 incident, off course then we have to assume tht Bin Laden is General Grievous. \n\nAs you can see how he won the elections anyway, with a Roaring success, and he is still in power, now he has turned his eyes to IRAQ. The only way for him to bring the US into power was thru war.Billions of dollars was used for weapons, the billions are being rolled up, its the only massive economic stabilizer for US, without war there is no weapons, no weapons no income, the US would be suffering in thier economy.
397709
AS MUCH AS THE REPUBLICANS IN HERE WISH TO BELIEVE IT, THERE IS NO CONNECTION BETWEEN 9/11 AND IRAQ.\n\nBIN LADEN EVEN SAID THAT SADDAM WAS AN INFIDEL.
141610
Did he start this war ? And don't natter about 9/11.  We know there was no connection concerning Iraq.
425534
No, too many major issues have occurred under his rule such as 9/11, Iraq and the immigration/Katrina fiascoes
24932
I DON'T THINK SO\nBush was 24 hours stressing on his campaign WAR of Terror but wat he did was just created more Terrorrist in the middle east and Terror to all Christian countries making us feel unsafe.U won't know when the next time a building might be strike again like the 9/11 style
109185
He is the WAR president, silly.  Now that just would not make good sense would it?  FLASH! to pn... where is the evidence that Iraq had ANYTHING to do with 9/11.  Were there any terrorists attacking the US from Iraq ? NO.\nAfter the US led invasion and occupation, Iraq is a training ground for terrorists from around the world - thanks to Bush.\nBut we caused that mess and created a political vacuum that is leading to a civil war.  Don't be a sheep and follow the sheeple that bleat 9/11 9/11 , terra terra terra. \nThey are largely uninformed and misled.
966498
i hope so. i believe it was an inside job. just way to many coincidences.NORAD standing down on that particular day  for first time in 35 yrs. Marvin bush company in charge of WTC security,he forgot to start renegotiating a new contract,old contract happened to end  on 9-11. why did they have to 'pull' building 7 ?  how could they not find both black boxes that are designed to survive crashes yet find the hijackers unburned passport on the street ? etc.