What was the spread and the o/u in the San Diego-Oakland game today(Sun. Nov 26.)?
827900
The spread at game time was SD -13 and O/U 43.5
933583
Hasselbeck plays at home against a weak GB secondary.  Rivers faces an Oakland pass defense that is actually quite underrated.  Plus there is the whole LT domination factor.  I'd definitely go with Hasselbeck even though it's his first game back in a while.
830475
Romo seems to have the hot hand and even though they are not getting blownout, they seem to be playing from behind.\n\nHines Ward and Reggie Brown.  Ward is a must go.  Bruce is playing in Seattle and we all saw that weather last night, miserable.  Furrey is not as good as anyone of these guys.  Brown is coming off a BYE and is playing a weak Washington D.
923038
Your right on with all your picks today. Tiki has been loosing all his TDs to Jacobs and Frank Gore, he plays for SanFran. The two jones will light it up today. Also your thoughts on LJ and Crumpler are right on. Alge is the better TE but you have a way better match up with LJ.\n\nGood Luck
287858
not as of 3/28/06 at 4:33 CST.  \n\nCheck out this link to help you out. \n\nhttp://proxy.espn.go.com/nfl/fa?null
816621
i don't agree with the call at all.  if a player willingly gives himself up (much like as if a QB were to slide or take a knee), contact is not needed for the play to be blown dead.\n\nthis guy caught the ball and gave himself up.  the play should have been blown dead as a completed pass.\n\nguess there are different rules for QB and non-QBs? i have no idea.. bottom line, the call cost the Raiders a shot at winning the game. \n\nevidence of a conspiracy against the Raiders, or a conspiracy for SD.  \n\nThis not only cost Oakland, but it cost DEN and KC a chance from gaining grould on a SD team that should have lost that game..
679182
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/recap?gameId=260520104
856690
the pass was a 43 yd pass.  Line of scrimmage was ND 43  \n\nOffical stats are here:\nhttp://web1.ncaa.org/d1mfb/driveSummary.jsp?expand=A&acadyr=2006&h=657&v=513&date=25-NOV-06&fn=null\n\ndrive summary:\n 4 Southern California PUNT 09:21 43 TD 08:21  2 57 1:00 \n(1st and 10) USC TROJANS drive start at 09:21 (4th). \n(1st and 10) Gable, C.J. rush for 14 yards to the UND43, 1ST DOWN USC (BRUTON). \n(1st and 10) Booty, J.D. pass complete to Jarrett, Dwayne for 43 yards to the UND0, 1ST DOWN USC, TOUCHDOWN, clock 08:21. \n(1st and 0) Danelo, Mario kick attempt failed. \n(1st and 0) Van Blarcom, T. kickoff 60 yards to the UND5, GRIMES return 17 yards to the UND22 (Bradford, Allen).
669338
lol nice guys, totally beat me by like 4 mins... sad thing is i have the yahoo sports stat tracker on too... 21 and 11 is right... go edwin encarnacion btw
765952
We had a similar issue in our league several weeks ago. Note that NFL gamecenter likely won't be corrected after the fact. To see the scoring corrections in Yahoo, go to your league page and select the Players tab at the top, and then select Stat Corrections.  FYI, McNabb was credited with a TD pass later in the week.\n\nIf you're not satisfied with this explanation, use the feedback link on this page:\n\nhttp://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/football/scoring/football-01.html\n\nYou probably won't get a response right away, but give it two days.
968973
Well, this week hurt a bit, but Boldin is a monster.  That should be an upgrade.  It wasn't an awful deal.  Overpaying isn't always bad.\n\nRomo has been very solid, but that game was an anomaly.  He's not going to do that every week.  He's only a week or two removed from a very modest no TD game.\n\nBulger's problem is the O-line.  Why they aren't throwing it to Holt all day is beyond me.  They are leaning on Jackson more.  \n\nYou are going to have to hope Bulger gets it figured out, simple as that.\n\nI would take a flyer on Jay Cutler.  Maybe you can catch lightning in a bottle.  He was incredible in preseason, and maybe he'll capitalize where Plummer couldn't.  They have a favorable matchup in the fantasy playoffs against Arizona.
1069919
Currently?\n\nFreddy Sanchez, Pit  \nHitting .351
757064
Grade: B-\n\n1. Stallworth is still risky.  It's not clear how effective he'll be.\n2. Henderson is a nice spot play IF Colston (concussion) and/or Horn (groin) are out or limited.  If he's the #3, I'm not sure that's a great play.\n3. Mike Bell may or may not get the load.  No word on Tatum Bell yet.  He'll get carries, but who knows how many?\n4. San Diego has no linebackers left.  They may not be able to continue their dominance up front.\n\nStill, you could have a decent week if the ball bounces your way on injuries to other players.\n\nGood luck!
905733
well i would not put any money on the line if i was asking this question.... obviously you know nothing about football. why did you put $20 on it?????????
916290
Raiders D ... against a mediocre Houston team, Oakland should handle themselves well.  If they could hold San Diego to 21 points in Week 12, then how many points do you think Houston will be able to put up?  Buffalo is on a hot streak and with McGahee's return, San Diego will hold itself well.  However, Buffalo has other weapons that need to be addressed (Parrish, Evans, Thomas) and, at least, can mix up the offensive schemes.\n\nOakland will face a primarily one-dimensional offense against Houston, which favors the Raider Defense this week.  Start them over San Diego.
927801
After a week of NFL games where nothing was predictable....NYJ beating New Eng, Favre wins in the dome, Indy sneaks by Buff, ATL losses to Cle, etc....I am looking for tonight's game to be more predictable.  Carolina is the superior team, they have also had the last two weeks plus to get ready for this game.  CAROLINA 27-13
782451
Well if you are panning on betting on these teams i would lay off all of them except San Diego over Oakland. Taking and giving points will break you even. Just load up on San Diego and give the points and bet over for a sure win!!!