rajasthan govt not alow to farmer his land agricluter?
816762
You mean there  really is a country where a farmer has to ask permission to farm his own farm. geeeeeeeeee you guys need top overthrow this bum rajasthan, hang him and dem,and freedom.
190487
I have to agree...feudalism...is HERE....NOW.  In a very NOW sort of way....!\n\nTo work for your land....Kinda the pseudo motto of the National Guard.\n\nSo to answer the question.....it is not all of a sudden....it is here now....prevalant and will continue UNTIL....we get it right.
978545
nope\nbecause common sense to a farmer is not commom sense to a city slicker\nthe problem is, everyone should agree with me and they dont\nits so sad\n:-)\n\npeace
1075737
Except in southeastern India, which receives most of its rain from the northeast monsoon in October and November, dryland cultivators place their hopes for a harvest on the southwest monsoon, which usually reaches India in early June and by mid-July has extended to the entire country. There are great variations in the average amount of rainfall received by the various regions--from too much for most crops in the eastern Himalayas to never enough in Rajasthan. Season-to-season variations in rainfall are also great. The consequence is bumper harvests in some seasons, crop-searing drought in others. Therefore, the importance of irrigation cannot be overemphasized.\n\nIrrigation has been a high priority in economic development since 1951; more than 50 percent of all public expenditures on agriculture have been spent on irrigation alone. The land area under irrigation expanded from 22.6 million hectares in FY 1950 to 59 million hectares in FY 1990, an increase of 161 percent in four decades (see table 28, Appendix). This increase was about 33 percent of the estimated potential. The overall strategy has been to concentrate public investments in surface systems, such as large dams, long canals, and other large-scale works requiring huge outlays of capital over a period of years, and in deep-well projects that also involve large capital outlays. Shallow-well schemes and small surface-water projects, mainly ponds (called tanks in India), have been supported by government credit but were otherwise installed and operated by private entrepreneurs. Roughly 42 percent of the net irrigated area in FY 1990 was from surface water sources. Tanks, step wells, and tube wells provided another 51 percent; the rest came from other sources.\n\nBetween 1951 and 1990, nearly 1,350 large- and medium-sized irrigation works were started, and about 850 were completed. The most ambitious of these projects was the Indira Gandhi Canal, with an anticipated completion date of close to 1999. When completed, the Indira Gandhi Canal will be the world's longest irrigation canal. Beginning at the Hairke Barrage, a few kilometers below the confluence of the Sutlej and Beas rivers in western Punjab, it will run south-southwest for 650 kilometers, terminating deep in Rajasthan near Jaisalmer, close to the border with Pakistan. A dramatic change already had taken place in this hot and inhospitable wasteland by the late 1980s. As a result, desert dwellers switched from raising goats and sheep to raising wheat, and outsiders flocked in to purchase six-hectare plots for the equivalent of US$3,000.\n\nProgress in irrigation has not been without problems. Large dams and long canals are costly and also highly visible indicators of progress; the political pressure to launch such projects was frequently irresistible. But because funds and technical expertise were in short supply, many projects moved forward at a slow pace. The Indira Gandhi Canal project is a leading example. And the central government's transfer of huge amounts of water from Punjab to Haryana and Rajasthan, frequently cited as a source of grievance by Sikhs in Punjab, contributed to the civil unrest in Punjab during the 1980s and early 1990s (see Political Issues, ch. 8; Insurgent Movements and External Subversion, ch. 10).\n\nProblems also have arisen as ground water supplies used for irrigation face depletion. Drawing water off from one area to irrigate another often leads to increased salinity in the supply area with resultant effects on crop production there. Some areas receiving water through irrigation are poorly managed or inadequately designed; the result often is too much water and water-logged fields incapable of production. To alleviate this problem, more emphasis is being placed on using irrigation water to spray fields rather than allowing it to flow through ditches. Furthermore, charges of corruption and mismanagement have been levied against government-operated facilities. Cases of bribe
719506
If the county owns they land...then they own it.\nThey don't have to do anything with it.
740963
A while back in US history, people shifted from having smaller farms to larger ones, and companies started buying huge tracts of land and developing it.  Because they had new mechanical equipment to help them farm, they grew more corn and more wheat than had been produced before on the same land.  As the farmer/corporations started to sell the grains, they realized there was too much of it on the market.  They could barely give it away.  They were on the brink of bankruptcy, and that meant that NO one would be growing either of these important crops.   So the government decided to bail them out by subsidizing the farms, just to ensure that someone was still growing food in the US.  (interestingly, this is also why the government pays people who own certain plots of farmland NOT to grow anything on their land, which is an even worse waste of tax dollars)  I'm not sure if this was meant as a temporary measure, but it has stuck around, probably because once the government starts giving away money, people start to think they have a right to it.  I'm sure if anyone proposed to stop the subsidies now, farmers would be in an uproar, even though their businesses would survive.  Maybe more small farms would fail without them, but the large corporations who produce most of our food would be fine.  So the answer to your question is, large producers of crops can support themselves, they just don't think they should have to.
932844
we do have a  land celing act here in India, acoording to which a person cnt have more than a limited amount of land.\n\nThis means less land in hands of rich people.\n\nDo you have anything like that?
1170779
No. A land is governed by Islam only if it follows Islamic law. So even many "Muslim countries" today are not governed by Islam.
498778
Most of the agricultural lands in India are very much less than a hectare and also some were unaccountable. Organic manure may help in good yield and the top soil in course of time has been eroded and it requires regeneration.
850354
if you eat you are part of agriculture without it you don't develop
923842
You are right. He was not a strong contender for the post of Prime MInister. He was picked by Sonia as the situation was not favourable for her to take the reins of the country. Once she finds the situation conducive for her of her son Rahul, our PM Manmohan will have to go.
422075
Yea. You are still proccessing somethin that belongs in the agriculture catagory. Why wouldnt you think that? You are still working on the farm, and having to do things old ways, yea it qualifys.
1153988
Agriculture generally requires large area of land and is land intensive. Land is ever becoming a scarce resource as world population is keeping exploding as a result of which the existing household per capita land is decreasing and hence people are cutting down forests in search of additional land for agriculture. On the other hand household lands are being monopolized by big commercial farms driving household farmers into towns. Still in some places household farmers are changing int producing high value products that do not need big land area.This has brought about a change in agriculture pattern in many areas of the world.
901414
some deades ago,some small merchants and traders,who did not have much money to buy land in open areas,made their shops in residential lands where there are the houses of people,it is illegal,as the shops should not mix with residential houses.but well,as u know,our goverment is lazy and corrupt,it did not bother to remove those shops.now,in 2006,the govermnet opened its eyes and realized that new delhi is the capital of india,and so this city must be diciplined ,and as u know the commenwealth games and asian games would be held here in 2010 and 2014 respectively.so,the government though to make new delhi more sophisticated in their "master plan 2021",so they made their first step  by making the life in delhi diciplined,by dividing the city into areas per category,like,the redential areas would be in one part of the city,and the shopping complexes,malls should be in another part of the city,and the delhi government even wanted the small shops to be closed,as they left a bad impression of our city,so they started closing all small shops located in residential areas.this closing of shops is called "sealing".well,they have already closed a lot of shops,but some are still left.then in  the days of diwali,one of delhi's major festivals,the government announced that no sealing would take place in these days,when the diwali celebration was over,the government(supreme court) said that sealing would again start from nov.1. now the traders and merchants became angry because by sealing their shops,they had no source of income,which could cause a lot of unemployment and civil disorder.the goverment did nothing about this problem of the merchants.it said that when those people knew that making shops in residential ares was illegal,that why did they make shops there.the merchants protest that when they made illegal shops,where was the government?why didn't it stop them,so in a way,it is the fault of both.still,to show their anger against the starting of sealing by nov.1,they started making rallys,protests etc. so the government had to withdraw its sealing plan on nov. 1.its chaos,no one knows whats happens next...........
836978
MORE THAN SIXTY PERCENT OF THE POPULATION IS DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ENGAGED ON AGRICULTURE.N AGRICULTURE NEEDS WATER FOR CROP CULTIVATION SO RAIN IS IMPORTANT IN TODAY'S AGE.
749056
There are not enough Merindians to govern the states.
845379
The Districts falling under this region are not developed when compared to other districts in the state of Andhra Pradesh\nThe meagre development of the districts came into light only when the issue of Telangana is raised.\nThere are no. of Quaries in this region, from which we can get lime stone, coal etc, and which is a asset to the whole Nation and even then they are being neglected.