Is anarchy such a bad thing?
824842
Anarchy rools in the yookay now.  We are a country bankrupt in justice - only the rich can afford to go to law and the judiciary tend to favour those with money who can also afford the most erudite lawyers sans any moral code with an eye on the bank balance.  To bring us back from the anarchy we now experience secret societies need to be curtailed, secret law courts abolished, those in power need to be made accountable.  Politicians have their snouts in the trough, local Councils pass planning laws based on funny handshakes and PPF seems to benefit donors of political parties, whilst honours from political parties are being sold for hard cash.  Our security services are out of control and manipulate the strings of power whilst we have democracy lite sold to us as the real thing.\n\nWe need a justice system where everyone is equal in the eyes of the law, where it is possible that an innocent man won't be shot down and the police won't shrug their shoulders if he is, where free speech is not abolished, where one can get accurate verbatim records of judicial hearings - in fact why not have every judicial hearing available to download on the net?\n\n The rot has been going on under blue and red for many years.  The only way to pull back is to stop voting the established parties and vote independent so that the whips don't prevent members of Parliament voting according to conscience.  Problem is in an anarchic world no one has a conscience any more.\n\nI have a dream - but am constantly brought back to the nightmare of our ruling anarchic elite who believe that when one robs Peter to pay Paul one always has the support of Paul - so this Paulene conspiracy to feather nests down the food chain gathers apace as snouts dig into the ever diminishing trough of fleecing the poor Peters to pay the conspiring Pauls.
353034
Authority: They make the rules.\nRules:     Without them there would be anarchy.\nProperty:  You should respect other people's property if you expect them to respect yours.\nOpinion:  You should respect other peoples' opinions even though you may not agree with them. they have a right to express a reasonable opinion; as long as expressing that opinion isn't harmful to society as a whole. For example racist or extremist opinions.
1156749
How about Anarchy...we're just a hair from it anyway!!
410120
Think about what would happen if suddenly everyone decided that they were tired of "keep right" when they drove. They wanted to drive on the left side too.\n\nThere aren't enough cops in the world to MAKE people drive on the right side of the line. \n\nA stronger example occurred in the LA riots a decade or so back. Law enforcement could not stop the looting. But a television image did. It was footage of a man carrying a freshly "liberated" TV set being set upon by a small gang robbed of it. Easier than going to the store, I suppose.\n\nBut the image brought home to people the eventual consequenses of anarchy, the idea that laws to protect propery were protecting THEIR property too. Due to this image, the SOCIAL CONTRACT again went into effect.\n\nSo my conclusion is that the social contract -- self-discipline and self-governance -- is the most important aspect of our society.
65398
A New World Order in principle is great.  In a world of robots it is perfection.  For humans it is horribly flawed if your interest is in the "common good" for all.  Human nature is never taken into account.
1089470
Being poor and being bad is different. I dont know what others have made you or your country men to believe, but poor or not bad. If someone does something bad then alone they are bad, whether they are rich or poor or whatever... I think whether it is Americans or whomsoever it be, being poor is something very sad if they cant get essential things for life... All Americans can never be bad. I am not American but I certainly would say that it is not to be generalised. Probably there is some gap in people's understanding...I think it exists in most countries.
402821
The Anarchist's Cookbook is a joke, actually.  Most of the stuff in there is common knowledge, and a lot of it was totally made up (Smoking a banana peel?  Come on now).\n\nSo no.  It's not illegal in any sense of the word.  Nor is it really dangerous.\n\nHeck, you can buy it on AMAZON!!!
812861
calling the police would have been better\nyou're advocating anarchy\n(personally, I dont blame you)\n\npeace
860009
Depends on the dictator.  Many actually do better for the people than what existed before them.  The consistent problem is no matter what they do, good or bad, people of the country become at best dependent on someone to do for them, or at worst enslaved and totally ripped off, as well as murdered, raped, well sort of like the worst of anarchy.  At best what happens when it comes to an end?  The worst of anarchy?
949924
Its like anarchy except that it has currants in it.
131228
Well I think it depends on what type of gang you are in. If this gang is up to no good (stealing, fighting other gangs, violence, drugs,drinking, getting "jumped in", etc) then it is wrong not only just for girls but for ANYONE. If it's a good gang, such a getting together to help clean up litter, help the elderly etc. then of course there is nothing with that. If you are in a bad gang, I suggest you get help immediately and try to find a way to get out of it. It may seem fun now, but it could end up deadly.
509328
Sounds good on the surface, but there is far too much room for abuse of power, as if the government isn't already abusing its power, but I won't go on about the obvious.\n\nShort answer: No.
464209
Anarchy, and one in which all countrymen are moral. (And a theocracy, if everyone believes, but then it's a god's dictatorship) That is the problem with communism- for it to work, you need a strong dictatorship.
343874
Depend on what you mean by bad. If you go out of your way to break the rules, that's not easy at all. But if you just use every opportunity you get to rub people the wrong way, that's just entertaining.
724178
Hard to say considering that only a few provinces are involved in such anarchy. \n\nIf you wish to blame anyone, blame Iran and Syria.
858338
quick craificaton: democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on what to have for lunch. that's why we have a democratic republic. anarchy is how most of us live anyway. i wouldn't live any differently if the state or the feds went away ty for the good question.
578594
depends on if you ask an economist or a sociologist.\n\nthe sociologist will probably say it is bad.\n\nThe economist will probably say it is a good thing.