who's "prince charles"?
814205
A ghastly relic of the Middle Ages who is a walking advertisement for republicanism.  A man who has to have seven boiled eggs lined up for him to choose the perfect one for his breakfast, a man who has to have his cushions plumped up by someone before he can put his ar*e on them, a man who likes a servant to squeeze toothpaste on his toothbrush for him, and a man who had to have a servant hold a specimen bottle for him to pee into.  This very man married a pretty young woman who he didn't love purely for his "breeding programme", while he was sleeping with a married woman, and when his ambition in life was to be reincarnated as one of her tampons.  He is someone who likes to pretend that he is an expert on subjects such as architecture, and who actively supported the disgusting "sport" of foxhunting right up to its abolition.  He has a fondness for Islam (even has an Islamic garden), has friends in the Bin Laden family and wants to defend all faith (in defiance of the 500 year requirements of his role as the future head of the C of E), even though many Muslims would have executed him for his adultery (the fate of a princess in Saudi Arabia).  When he married his mistress he should have gone into exile, as Edward VIII did. I hope that answers your question!
629867
No I do not know Charles.
1050833
Depends on the country.\n\nAlright, saying the UK makes this answer very simple. Pick up the nearest tabloid. You'll see one of three people on the front. All three have the same first name: Prince. Either William, Harry, or Charles will follow.\n\nThat's where your tax money is going.
535958
742: Charles the Great is born on April 2, traditionally in this year, but possibly as late as 747\n\n\n751: Charlemagne's father Pippin is declared king, beginning what would later be called the Carolingian dynasty\n\n\n768: Upon the death of Pippin, the kingdom of Francia is divided between Charles and his brother Carloman\n\n\n771: Carloman dies; Charles becomes sole ruler \n\n772: Charlemagne makes his first raid on the Saxons, which is a success; but this was just the beginning of an extended struggle against the decentralized pagan tribes\n\n\n774: Charlemagne conquers Lombardy and becomes King of the Lombards\n\n\n778: An unsuccessful siege of Saragossa, Spain, is followed by an ambush of Charlemagne's retreating army by the Basques at Roncesvalles \n\n781: Charles makes a pilgrimage to Rome and has his son Pippin proclaimed King of Italy; here he meets Alcuin, who agrees to come to Charlemagne's court\n\n\n782: In response to recent attacks by Saxon leader Widukind, Charlemagne reportedly has 4,500 Saxon prisoners executed en masse\n\n\n787: Charles launches his educational plan by ordering bishops and abbots to open schools near their churches and monasteries \n\n788: Charlemagne takes control of Bavaria, bringing all the territory of the Germanic tribes into one political unit\n\n\n791-796: Charles conducts a series of campaigns against the Avars in present-day Austria and Hungary. The Avars are eventually destroyed as a cultural entity\n\n\n799: Pope Leo III is attacked in the streets of Rome and flees to Charlemagne for protection. The king has him conducted safely back to Rome\n\n\n800: Charlemagne comes to Rome to oversee a synod where Leo clears himself of the charges laid on him by his enemies. At Christmas mass, Leo crowns Charlemagne Emperor\n\n\n804: The Saxon wars finally come to an end \n\n812: Byzantine emperor Michael I acknowledges Charlemagne as emperor, though not as "Roman" emperor, providing official power to the power Charles already wielded in fact\n\n\n813: Charles delegates imperial power to Louis, his last surviving legitimate son\n\n\n814: Charlemagne dies in Aachen
561810
i dont t think that prince charles would have got diana killed.\n\nafter all he is not stupid enough that he wont know that he will be the first person on whom the finger of suspicion would be raised.\n\nmoreover it would have been a hell of risk for him to take with the gains nowhere close.\n\ni think that it is another of those conspiracy theories by people who dont have anything worthwhile to do.\n\ni think that his new wife is fabulous. she knows the way she is supposed to carry herself as a member of the royal family and doesnt get herself into controversies.  and both of them love each other very much, what else do you want.\n\nas for his son i think the younger one is a bit headstrong like his mother while the elder seems to be sensible enough.
1137290
Charles is heir to throne and I don't think he'd abdicate.  I think its wrong to say that nobody likes him, so he's made a few mistakes in life, haven't we all!  In my opinion this should make it easier for the public to relate to him and make him the peoples monarch.  I can't blame him if he wants to be George after his coronation, Kings named Charles don't really have a good track record in this country!  I hope that the public do accept Camilla as Queen, she is so supportive to Charles and makes him look happy and relaxed, isn't this what a Queen should do for the King?  It annoys me that people go on about how she's not the prettiest woman alive but as long Charles and Camilla and happy it doesn't really matter and they have my support!
355624
Not that I know of but it could well be Prince Charles.\n\nActually I don't know which dictionary you're talking about but that would include millions of people who never worked a dayin their lives.\n\nThe conventional definition of 'unemployed' as I understand it is 'out of work but wanting to work'. People who choose not to seek employment are not considered part of the 'work force' and are generally not listed in unemployment statistics.
791162
Elizabeth Windsor\nPhillip Mountbatten-Windsor\n\nCharles Phillip Arthur George Mountbatten-Windsor, \n\nusing Prince Phillips last name of Mountbatten with that of the Queen's, Windsor.  How we know is his Marriage certificate with Lady Diana Spencer, his wife.  The same last name is used for his brothers.  However, when he becomes King, his last name (Charles only) will be Charles Phillip Arthur George Windsor.  (No Mountbatten).
205215
full name is Charles Philip Arthur George mountbatton-windsor
813656
probably princess diana and prince charles
828509
Charles Babbage\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Babbage
674469
Hon, I want to help out but there are quiet a few Charles Jordans???\n\nCheck out the website below maybe it will help you.\n\nCharles Gordon may be:\n\nCharles George Gordon (1833-1885), ("Chinese" Gordon), British soldier & colonial governor \nCharles Gordon (producer) \nCharles Gordon (humorist), Canadian journalist \nCharles Grant Gordon, beverage entrepreneur \nCharlie Gordon (born 1951), British politician \nCharles Gordon (CFL) (fl. 1990s), Canadian football player \nCharles Gordon (KU) (fl. 2000s), American football player
158248
Is it Charles R. Drew?
109098
LOL a man. Royal Family Memba.
668108
I respect the QUEEN the most...Prince Charles the least...Good question,Princess!...Prince David/Royal House of David
550805
Sorry, but how would anyone know the answer except Prince William. My advice is to find his email address and go ask him.
732751
I believe it was Charles Lamb.