was it me or was the new Bond Movie not that great??
818753
I didn't like it either.\n\nI can't seem to get into ANY Bond other than Sean Connery.
815974
I liked it, but it is missing something that the other Bond movies had.  Definitly worth the ticket price and it was very good, but there was just something missing.
891717
My father, who's a dead ringer for Sean Connery, took me to see my first Bond movie in 1964 - the premiere of Goldfinger.  Sean will always be Bond first in my heart.\nRoger Moore was great as The Saint, but I thought he was too slick and shiny as Bond.\nGeorge "One Shot" Lazenby was good enough - there were some excellent action sequences in that flick.\nI liked Timothy Dalton except for his Burt Lancaster-esque laugh.\nAnd I certainly liked Brosnan - he was cool under fire.\nI haven't seen Daniel Craig yet but I'm looking forward to it.\nHow 'bout you?
834342
I agree, it was a cop out!  The movie was lame because it introduced too many unnecessary characters. They should have focused on the main ones from the previous films. Cyclops was made to look like a wimp, and they killed him off screen - how pathetic!  I hate that they removed Mystique from the picture so early on - she is an awesome character. The scenes with Magneto were excellent, but Jean (Phoenix) just stood by doing nothing for most of the film. It could have been much better!
230187
Was the other one, Pierce Brosnan, able to drive a stick shift? Anyways, I can't believe they picked Daniel Craig. And they are probably going to get rid of the corny one-liners and jokes that make the movies a Bond movie. They plan on doing a serious Casino Royale> That's the worst idea in the world!
347283
It wasnt as violent as promised, i didnt care about any characters, the first half seemed more of a comedy - i agree on the eye scene too... lol - stupid stupid stupid film. I actually watched the clips on the net and then when i watched the film i discovered i had already seen all the gore in it...... i thought it was gonna be sick. It didnt seem real, i mean i know it wasnt real...lol, but it seemed far fetched because of the stereotypes used in it - like the guys at the place, they looked like steroid induced Russians from and old Arnie flick, and the doctor guy - that scene where he touched the dude on the leg on the train reminded me of "Eurotrip"... mmmmscuse LOL... in fact it was kinda like eurotrip but with some death scenes thrown in... and the cities, Amsterdam, etc, they all just looked false and again stereotypical of people conceptions of european cities...\nI wonder how it would have done without Tarantino's name attached ...
324290
I thought it would be a lot better than it was; it had so much potential. It isn't a suspense thriller by any stretch, it moves really slow and quiet (kinda similar to "The Good Girl"). You randomly see the husband and wife getting it on and you have no clue why; I didn't feel the connection between the two. My boyfriend was disappointed as well; its not just a gender thing. If you really want to see it wait til your local video store either has a special or it goes in the dollar bin.
1181868
I would be really surprised if they were making a cheaper by the dozen 3 because the last one did not do well at all. Although, I thought the movie was okay especially for a sequel. After all, I did not expect it to be a blockbuster hit. Also, I check the Yahoo movies site and it does not list anything under Hillary Duff's future movies.
447205
I haven't seen it yet, was it really that bad???
833058
Yes, I'm pretty sure you are the only one on the face of this great green earth who doesn't like the new James Bond!  You may be  forgetting the premise of the movie:  This is the beginning of James Bond as 007 -- he's supposed to be different than all the other James Bonds to follow -- he is a work in progress (aren't we all?)
906719
I enjoyed it far more than I was expecting to. Don't listen to anyone who tells you that a blond northern bloke can't play Bond. He does a fantastic job \n\nGo and see it, you won't regret it !
354907
Dissapointing - premise had potential i guess but it was so predictable all the way throughout, didnt care about any characters, tying things up didnt always gel.... and the version i watched was labelled "Uncut - different to cinema version" - what was cut ???? Nothing actually happened on camera did it ?? I hate films that treat us, the viewer, as though we are stupid enough to fall for some of there crap !\nInstead of twisting everywhere it would have played better as a straight forward slasher flick, why do they always have to be clever - when Jason whacked heads off in Crystal Lake he just did it cos he was a serial killer... put the scares back and stop coming up with weak excuses why this person killed that person....LOL
527824
I totally agree. It's such a lame movie! What's the point of it? What's so interesting about it that people haven't gotten the first time? I don't think anyone can answer these questions. Plus, the ring wasn't even pretty.
435449
Yes, I saw it last weekend and I was so disappointed! It was so bad I feel like I wasted my money.  I think 3 was probably the best, maybe 2.
979859
Nope.  It was a slower movie, I will say that, but there was alot of mental torture, along side the physical torture.  If you aren't one to pick up on psychological thrillers and such, you are missing a big part of this movie.  \n\nI think they did a very cool job with the effects.  Very realistic.  And some totally wicked cool contraptions!
683175
the next james bond movie is called casino royale and it stars daniel craig as the new 007. should come out by the ned of the year
722785
Ph god, it was terrible, it's just a movie that tries to show how cool, sexy and uber Tom cruise is. Or just what I feel. Since when did M-I become 007? The only one that closely relates to the actual concept of Mission Impossible was the first movie by Brain Depalma. NEVER trust a movie which only shows the main actor's as the only attarction in the posters (no director, no co-actors, and no hint of what's coming).