If you were prime minister of the UK what would you do with your power?
823771
What you have to understand is that the bath separatists party is looking to break away from main  personal hygiene state and form a separate lying in your own filth empire. The shower party is looking into taking over land owned I believe by the bathroom mat enclave in the lino Province it has already made several incurison necessitating an intervention by the washing powder elite forces in conjunction with the indesit committee. In order to answer this question we first need to seek resolution of all areas of conflict and try to maintain the status quo by having a wash instead!
431556
I would go and buy a nuke off the black market and\n use it. My husband, and many other members of my family are in the military.
358508
vote. What a pointless waste of time, get rid of this Head Of State rubbish, you need one democratically elected leader and that's that.  The Yanks do it, and it seems to work for them.  I guess you can tell I'm a Brit who wants a republic, but I wouldn't replace the queen with a president, just keep the role of PM
1171315
I'd bring home all the troops and let them kill and torture each other in Iraq, Iran, and wherever else they want to live like cowards...then I'd give every hard working American citizen an electric car, so the oil companies could kiss our butts....then I'd fire Cheney, and Rumsfeld, and all the other sorry behinds in our government!!!!!
855375
when you have a looser like blair in charge what do you expect
436221
Cameron. Because he's like a tory version of Tony Blair.
748074
Well most importantly I'd make sure my wealth lasts so I can keep helping for longer.\nI'd probably want to make a bit more before I used a considerable chunk to help society.\n\nI wouldn't give to any charities though. I think they are kind of self-defeating. I would like to help make my hometown somewhere worth visiting.\nI would save small shops and things like that. Try to stop the big corporations taking over.\nGive to the smaller cities (in Britain where I live) and help them to get more things and to compete with London. London gets too much and it's not fair on people who live nowhere near it.\n\nI would help fund things like skateparks and independant cinemas and youth hostels so people can travel about the country on a budget.\n\nI don't see much point in giving thousands of pounds to a charity for a rare disease which is only going to benefit about 10 people across the whole country. Or to cancer research or something when people are going to continue to smoke and then wonder why they got lung cancer. Then they need to be treated on the NHS.
602667
Put faith in your new government with the backing of brits and usa you will become a democracy believe me one day soon you will be proud to be iraqi and a dentist you do a wonderful job keep the faith your people need you.
241562
I would ban all religions,taxes and government. I would also put individual freedom as the top agenda.
876345
The Queen of England does in fact have more power than those of us here in America commonly believe.  And for those who believe it's Parliament who runs the country, I will remind you of this:  Before Parliament may begin their session, it is the QUEEN who grants them their power to do so, and there is a very great and large debate among scholars as to just what would happen should the Queen chose not to grant Parliament her ''ok.''\n\nAlso, for those narrow minded idiots who actually think the Queen has no power...here are just a few of her abilities:\n\nAmong the powers possessed by the monarch in the United Kingdom under the Royal Prerogative are:\n\n    * The appointment and dismissal of ministers;\n    * The dissolution of parliament and the calling of elections;\n    * Clemency and pardon;\n    * The award of dignities and honours;\n    * The declaration of war;\n    * The declaration of an emergency;\n    * The grant of Charters of Incorporation;\n    * The collection of tolls;\n    * The minting of coinage;\n    * The issue and revocation of passports;\n    * The expulsion of a foreign national from the United Kingdom;\n    * The creation of new common law courts;\n    * The creation of new universities;\n    * The appointment of bishops and archbishops in the Church of England;\n    * The printing of the authorised Church of England version of the Bible;\n    * The publication of all statutes, legislative instruments and Orders-in-Council;\n    * The exercise of jurisdiction over numerous Royal foundations of all kinds;\n    * The appointment of Royal Commissions and Officers for any purposes.\n    * The choice of the numbering of monarchs (See MacCormick v. Lord Advocate)\n\nThe queen is also immune from prosecution in the courts as she is present in all courts and acts as the prosecuting authority in most criminal cases, either directly or indirectly\n\nIt's also worth noting that before British involvement in the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Prime Minister Tony Blair, in a major break with precedent, sought parliamentary approval for British participation in the war. However Parliament's decision was in constitutional terms advisory as the actual decision would be taken by the exercise of the Royal Prerogative.\n\nLastly, I'll mention that it is His Majesty's personal prerogatives are:\n\n   1. The refusal to dissolve Parliament when requested by the Prime Minister. This was last reputedly done in 1910 (but George V later changed his mind);\n   2. To dissolve Parliament (and call a new general election) against the wishes of the Prime Minister;\n   3. To appoint a Prime Minister of her own choosing. This was last done in Britain in 1963 when Elizabeth II appointed Sir Alec Douglas-Home as Prime Minister.\n   4. The dismissal of a Prime Minister and his Government. This was last done in Britain in 1834 by King William IV; and\n   5. The refusal of the Royal Assent, last exercised in 1708 by Queen Anne [1].
16313
Check out:\nhttp://www.royal.gov.uk/\nfor more details. She is our Head of State and in theory has the power to disolve our Government. In effect this would be highly unlikley to happen! The UK is a constitutional monarchy so the Royal duties are mainly cermonial.
1093102
I would do something so radical it may shock those who read it - I would actually follow the U.S. Constitution! I would veto all bills that came to my desk that would be unconstitutional if made law. I would veto all budgets that funded even ONE program not permitted by it.
529252
I would open a home for children without parents or parents who are not involved.  And then I would hope I could get government help to keep it going. That would be something I would do.
366318
in England Tony Blair is our prime minister
784760
its a Constitutional monarchy\n\nthe queen owns it all and is the supreme power, but Parliament run and administer the country.\n\nthe powers she is suppose to have can't ever really be used, she's more of a big walking advertisement for the UK - but...she's the head of some parts of the army, all the navy and all the air force...so she could...in theory. do what the king of Thailand did a while back...if needs be.
355149
I'd tell President Bush that he's an idiot and he's screwing up my home, the country I love.\n\nRight now if I did that I'd probably be called a terrorist and thrown into a secret prison to be tortured.
1042956
I agree. Get rid of the royal family. They are no use to no-one. Not to workers or capitalists. It should be the one and only thing in witch  both of you would unite in.\nIt really amazes, how the english peolple accepts some dozen of human beings just party with style and luxury all their lives from birth to grave, and all is payed from taxes. A dream life for nothing.