Who design the plane?
827952
in 1799, Sir George Cayley, a baronet in Yorkshire, near Scarborough, England, conceived a craft with stationary wings to provide lift and "flappers" to provide thrust. It also had a movable tail to provide control. So convinced was he that this idea is an earth-shaker, he engraved a drawing of this craft on a silver disk. Cayley wass the first to separate the different forces that keep an aircraft in the air, and his engraving was the first recorded drawing of a fixed-wing aircraft -- an airplane. So It was dear old blighty that came up with it.
385869
Inspired!!!\n\nI think he was engineered, created and modified as opposed to recruited;)
947171
ok well what do you want to know?\n\ndesigners use physics when they design airplanes.\nphysics allows us to determine how much lift a wing will produce and thus how much weight a plane will be able to carry.\nIt determines which materials and how strong they have to be to hold the plane together. \n\nphysics can also describe how the control surfaces (flaps and rudder) affect the plane and how big they have to be to control the plane safely.\n\nand that is just a start. physics is used in all aspects of designing and flying a plane.
524662
Companies of the size and reputation of Boeing and Airbus cannot make Chinese type planes. With a properly trained/experienced pilot, both the planes are safe - one cannot say the same about many other makes!
991449
Planes Mistaken For Stars.\n\nThey are fucking genius, and get no credit whatsoever.
487444
There seems to be a part missing.\n\nPossibly airplane:Wright::telephone:Bell
334477
I'm almost certain that Grumman and McDonnell are the Engineer's names you are looking for. \nThe Company which designed the original and all the variations of F-15 (Eagle, Strike Eagle, etc) was McDonnell Douglas Corp. \n"...After looking over the initial concept studies, in March of 1966 the USAF issued Concept Formulation Study (CFS) contracts for these requirements to three manufacturers--Boeing, Lockheed, and North American. Although Grumman and McDonnell had not been awarded any Air Force contracts, they nevertheless continued to fund their own studies on the same requirements. \n\n( )...However, none of the submitted designs were considered any further by the Air Force, mainly because the aerodynamic configurations and the bypass ration of the turbofans were considered inadequate. Nothing was ordered by the Air Force, and work on the F-X proceed at only a slow pace from mid-1966 to the autumn of 1967. On April 28, 1967, McDonnell merged with the Douglas Aircraft Corporation, becoming McDonnell Douglas. However, all of the work on the company's F-X proposal continued to be carried out at the St Louis facility ".
279165
Fundamentals of Sailplane Design\n("Grundlagen für den Entwurf von Segelflugzeugen")\nby Fred Thomas\nForeword by L. M. M. Boermans (President, OSTIV)\n\nISBN 0-9669553-0-7\nLibrary of Congress Catalog Card Number: 99-61150\n9" x 10.5", 286 pages, hardcover\nIndex and Bibliography\n\n\n$50 US + S&H\nNow available!\nOrdering information below. \n\nThe definitive text on sailplane design by Fred Thomas, Professor of Aerospace Engineering at the Technical University of Braunschweig (Germany). Covers the basics of sailplane design, including aerodynamics and flight mechanics, operational and regulatory requirements, aerodynamic design optimization, wind tunnel and flight test procedures, and historical outlook. Appendix with extensive collection of detailed design data and 3-view drawings for over 150 sailplanes, including both vintage gliders and modern sailplanes. \n\nContents\n\nBasic Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics: Fluid dynamics and the sailplane - Airfoil and wing theory - Performance and handling qualities - Aeroelasticity \nDesign Requirements: Certification requirements - JAR-22 - Cross country theory - Thermal models and climb performance \nSailplane Design Optimization: Basic considerations - Wing design - Variable geometry - Flying wings - The World Class - Fuselage and wing-fuselage transition - Empennage and controls \nDetermination of Performance and Handling Characteristics: Theoretical methods - Experimental methods \nTrends in Sailplane Development: Sailplane class definitions - Early glider designs - Sailplane development to date - Outlook \nAppendices: Tabulated design data and three-view drawings - "Zacher" flight test protocol - German-English glossary of technical terms \n\nAn errata sheet is available here. \n\nHow to order\nPlease order "Fundamentals of Sailplane Design" from one of the following suppliers. Most accept online orders. You can also order the title through your local bookstore (it will, however, take longer). \n\n\nNorth and South America:\nKnauff and Grove Soaring Supplies (Julian, PA) Toll free: (888) 724-3677; (814) 355-2483, fax (814) 355-2633. Ships internationally. Accepts Credit Cards. \n\nDAR Corporation (Lawrence, Kansas) (785) 832-0434 Ships internationally. Accepts Credit Cards. \nAircraft Technical Book Co. (Tabernash, CO) (970) 887-2207, (800) 780-4115 (toll free) Ships internationally. Accepts Credit Cards. \nKiona Publishing Inc. (Richland, WA) Ph/Fax (509) 627-0456, (866) 627-0456 (toll free) Ships internationally. Accepts Credit Cards. \nSailplane Homebuilders Association (Tehachapi, CA) (join SHA and receive book at discount) \nBob Wander's Soaring Books and Supplies (Minneapolis, MN) Toll free: (800) 660-0238 Accepts Credit Cards
730662
e. Nintendo\n\n\nd is actually correct but not the best answer.  a was the start of the Ind. revolution.  c probably very few airports built having no airplanes yet.  I would have to say the answer is b...very tricky.  Why do you think it was England?
9461
The chief architects of the Pentagon were George Edwin Bergstrom and David J. Witmer. They had orginally design a square building with one side cutoff to preserve an existing road at the proposed building site. This resulted in a pentagon shape.\n\nPolitics resulted in a change in the building site and refinements in design by the architects defined the Pentagon's final form.
105761
Very detailed and very complex.  The shuttle was built by a multitude of contractors, so each contractor had their own technical drawings, but all these drawings and assemblies had to meet the specification of NASA.
974849
The USAF does not actually build them.  They look at the proposed designs from the major aircraft designers (such as Lockheed Martin) then they just pick the one that best suits the purposes of the Air Force.  There are several designs that are presented when the USAF goes looking for a new aircraft.  Only after they see the capabilities will the Air Force make their choice.  They have a very rigorous test that they put the potential aircraft through and only those that pass with the highest marks will be accepted.  This test will generally narrow the selection down to one or two planes.
1084157
They found that the second wing (bi-wing planes) was not helping the planes lift, but rather was just adding unnecessary weight to the plane.  Therefore it was inefficient.\n\nSome planes today actually have a smaller wing in the front and a larger wings in the back.   Also, some one plane known as the flying wing did not have a wing in the back.  In fact this is basically the design of our new stealth fighters and bombers.   \n\nSo new designs are coming forward all the time that find new design concepts in flying.
673054
There seems to be a part missing - as it is, this doesn't quite make sense.\n\nPossibly airplane:Wright::telephone:Bell
1070185
It is necessarily true that a plane would be built IF nothing makes that impossible.  It might be impossible because the parts are not in the junkyard, and the parts could be aluminum atoms.  Or it may be impossible because the tornado does not have the ability to bond the broken windshield fragments, only smash them together, which breaks them down.\n\nFrom infinity big bangs, there would be me typing this and you reading it...seven...carry the...infinity times.
239902
i have no idea...but if i had to guess...it would probably be something they made up and customized.
952996
my grandfather worked in area 51 for 3 years. my own grandma didnt even know it until after he died. the secrets run deep out there, but what she figured out was they were testing experimental aircraft. the secrecy is for our national security. my grandfather designed electrical blueprints for aircrafts. the stealth bomber was one of his "projects".