What is the meaning of Pentium 111 667 MHZ?
823941
Pentium 3 is the CPU and 667 MHZ is the processor speed.
695852
I think I understand what you are saying a little better than the other people.  You are looking at the 1.86Ghz speed and comparing that to Pentiums in the 3GHz range and saying, well wouldn't the Pentiums be faster.  The answer is no, because speed is no longer the only important factor.  The new Core 2 Duos are based on a much better architecture, which allows them to do a lot more work than the old Pentiums, even at a lower speed.\n\nKeep in mind, this is not because it is dual core.  The Pentium Ds were dual core, and some had clock speed of 3.4Ghz and stuff like that, but the Core 2 Duo would still be faster because of its better architecture.  Also, don't listen to the people who said to just double the speed because it is dual core, that is incorrect, it just doesn't work that way.
292134
the 1800+ is running at 266mhz bus speed i belive from what i have read and the 3.0ghz is useing either a 400mhz or 533mhz or 800mhz bus speed cpuz-z is good at finding that stuff out
1097600
sure minimum sys req:\n\n    *  Pentium 233 MHz (Recommended: Pentium 500MHz or greater)\n    * 64 MB RAM (Recommended: 128 MB RAM or greater)\n    * 52 MB hard drive space
483654
You usually have the point to make it shorter. so 1.6ghz would be 1160. 2.6 is 2600, 2.0 is 2000 etc
386957
There might be, but it makes no sense.\n\n550 MHz is glacially slow.  You will have to upgrade most of your system, including the motherboard, CPU, and RAM, to get anywhere near today's standards for performance.
908329
you posted in wrong section\n\nthe e6300 is a desktop processor\n\n> yes, its good, not awesome\n1.86 ghz, 1066 mhz fsb, 2 mb l2 cache\n\nthe e6400 is 2.13 ghz, 1066 mhz fsb, 2 mb l2 cache\n\nthe e6600, e6700 have higher clock speeds, but that's not all, their l2 cache is an awesome 4 mb\n\nas for the notebook core 2 duo series from intel,\nthe t7x00 is awesome, featuring 4 mb l2 cache !
531586
THE INTEL DUO CORE IS MUCH MORE BETTER THAN INTEL PENTUM M \n\nIT RUNS AT 667MHZ  FSB AND M RUNS AT MAX 400MHZ
258848
MHz - megahertz\nGHz - gigahertz\n1GHz=1000MHz\nAbbreviation for megahertz. One MHz represents one million cycles per second. The speed of microprocessors, called the clock speed, is measured in megahertz. For example, a microprocessor that runs at 200 MHz executes 200 million cycles per second. Each computer instruction requires a fixed number of cycles, so the clock speed determines how many instructions per second the microprocessor can execute. To a large degree, this controls how powerful the microprocessor is. Another chief factor in determining a microprocessor's power is its data width (that is, how many bits it can manipulate at one time). \nIn addition to microprocessors, the speeds of buses and interfaces are also measured in MHz.
186259
The Pentium D is a 64 bit chip. The AMD Athlon 64X2 is a dual-core processor while the Athlon 64 is a single core.
191711
Check out Tom's Hardware Guide. They have a special article called "The Mother of All CPU Charts". This should help you find what you're looking for.
203139
Software that is written to take advantage of a dual-core processor will allow both cores to work together to complete a task. You won't get true 6 GHz performance, but it will be significantly quicker than if you were running a single core 3 GHz processor. One complaint about the Pentium D chips is the two core use the Front Side Bus to talk to each other, therefore, the processor speed is limited when the two cores are working together. I'm running a Pentium D 830, and aside for an increase in my electric bill, I'm happy with it's performance.
493026
r u kidding, a Pentium D is a dual core processor, that means that u have two and i mean two 2.8Ghz processors which equal 5.6Ghz and u can burn ur DVDs and watch ur movies and surf the Internet in the same time because the load is divided between the two processors,go for the Pentium D off course, that if u can Handel it's price\nNote: u will need a different Motherboard if u want to go for dual core
663224
Pentium D is not a true 64-bit CPU. It has some 64-bit extenstions for memory access, but is not really 64-bit in the true sense of the term.
667524
All I know is that it's a TI chip based on TMS320 DSP platform. I found a good expression on the following site, but am not sure it's valid still.\n\nBetter to take a look at TI databooks.\nYours\nFredy
137723
The best place to get this information is straight from Intel.\n\n>> Systems based on Pentium 4 processors 2.80 GHz (and below) should have a maximum expected temperature of 40°C in the maximum expected external ambient (which is typically 35°C). <<\n\nhttp://support.intel.com/support/processors/pentium4/sb/CS-007999.htm\n\nHope this helps.
37178
Those numbers represent how fast they are compared to a Pentium 4 processor.  First a little explanation is in order, AMD 64 and Athlon processors have more L1/L2 cache than comparable Pentium 4 processors in some cases but all AMD processors have faster data pathways and can process information more efficiently than a Pentium 4 processor.  So when for example when you see an AMD 64 4000+ running at 2.4GHz that does not mean a single thing as far as clock speed goes.  Intel is famous for milking the clock speed which is no longer the determinant when it comes to the performance of a processor.  Back to the AMD designations, the 4000+ (or any XXXX+) designation tells you that in this case with 4000+ it performs to the equivalent of a Pentium 4 running at 4GHz which Intel has been unable to produce, they top out at 3.8GHz.  So a 2700+ is the equivalent of a Pentium 4 at 2.7GHz, 3200+ is the equivalent of a Pentium 4 at 3.2GHz and so on.\n\nBut note that the lower end Sempron has the same designations of XXXX+ like a Sempron 3000+ but it is not being compared to a Pentium 4.  The Sempron 3000+ means it performs like an Intel Celeron clock at 3.0GHz.\n\nSo when you see the "+" designation on an Athlon it is being compared to a Pentium 4 and the "+" designation on a Sempron is being compared to a Celeron.\n\nIf you want a further explanation of why AMD processors can get by with slower clock speeds and still operate faster than Intel offerings, see these benchmarks over at Toms Hardware and note how all the AMD Athlon chips are at the top of the chart, http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/11/21/the_mother_of_all_cpu_charts_2005/page24.html