Visual Studio .Net ---- New vs Old Version -- Please Read Details?
823029
You need to provide a bit more informations if you want any useful tips.  \n-What are the two versions here?  2002 and 2003, 2003 & 2005...\n-What exactly happens when you try to run it?  Do not work isn't that much help
357354
When you reopen your program make sure that you have opened the project file using visual studio and not just the .cs file because without the project file you will not be able to compile or run your project\n\nhope this helps
131768
You, can just go to the website, and install the latest version, that is out, It's version 6..They have a newer one out now, its version 7, but it is still in beta (testing) I would recommend that you get the 6 version, for now..I heard the 7 is picking up, a lot of problems..Here is the website, where you can get it..http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/default.mspx\nYou do not have to uninstall the older version, it will just install the newer one..Good Luck..
957232
in 1.x visual studio, you can specify the order of compilation.  Right click the main project and go to preferences.  You'll see how to specify the order.\n\nI don't have visual studio in front of me at this moment to walk you through the steps, but that is the right direction to go.\n\nYou can add a project within your main project.  That's what I do when I add class libraries.  Make sure you go to new project, and then add to current project.
57959
Side-by-side programming in .NET is creating applications that use different versions of the .NET framework.\n\nBy default, all (desktop) applications compiled with Visual Studio 2002 use version 1.0 of the .NET Framework, those compiled with Visual Studio 2003 use version 1.1 of the .NET Framework and those compiled with Visual Studio 2005 use version 2.0 of the framework.\n\nASP.NET applications, as of version 1.0 and 1.1 of the framework, required different ASP.NET IIS filters to be used on the site, depending upon the version of the framework the Web application was compiled against.  With the .NET Framework 2.0, individual Web sites can be configured to use either version of the framework through the IIS configuration tool.\n\nSide-by-side execution allows for all versions of the framework to be installed on the computer and the respective applications will use the appropriate versions.  Executable applications which don't use "breaking changes" (or those that no longer work with the newer frameworks) can modify their application configuration file to use different versions of the .NET framework.
65676
VB.Net code uses .Net library classes where as VB code dont.\nalthough you can use a convertor to convert your old vb project int vb.net but reverse is not possible.
154826
Try uninstalling and reinstalling your .NET framework and be sure to get the newest version of 1.1. You could also try version 2.0 but it is still in beta.
235205
There are quite a few differences between the two. Probably too many to really explain fully. If you are looking to begin programming then you should use VB Express 2005 or C# Express 2005 (if you've never programmed before).\n\nVB6 is still a great programming language and is used daily to make good Windows programs. But the versatility and power of the .Net platform make it a better choice. (That is if you are looking to use Microsoft products)
611205
It's quite simple. Just create a snk file (a strong name key). This snk file is a special file that generated only by developers to ensure the intergrity of your .NET class libraries.\nOn Visual Studio 2005, right-click the project name and choose Properties. After that, click Signing (on the left side). Check the "Sign the assembly" check box and then create the snk file.\nIf the class library is decompiled and rebuild, it will ask the original snk file. This will add protection to your class library.
290098
"the difference is obvious" as quoted from microsoft itself.\n\nVisual Basic .NET is in no way a sucessor of Visual Basic 6, its a completely new language that is named by Microsoft as Visual Basic, which is completely stupid as these makes confusion. (This is actually true, since VB.NET is not build on top of VB6, it's almost made from scratch)\n\nVB.NET is actually out of the road of Visual Basic, it doesn't have, in any way, Visual Basic essences. If you want to know, Visual Basic .NET is created by some stupid C (or C++, or C#)developers, not VB developers, stupidly interesting isn't it?\n\nAnd some people have also been saying that Visual Basic .NET is C# rebranded to get VB popularity over C\n\nVB.NET, IMO, should be put down, and VB7 (which is currently not available), should be put as the succesor of VB. VB7 would in my imagination, support .NET framework, but have the same concept to VB6
476724
There's no appreciable difference in the performance of ASP.NET 2.0 versus 1.1.\n\nHowever, you need to keep pace with changes in the .NET Framework; eventually, Microsoft will stop supporting older technologies.\n\nASP.NET 2.0 has a significantly better collection of layout controls; has very useful, cross-platform navigation controls; has significantly more convenient methods of data access and display; makes it far easier to create custom components and handlers; and has simplified many of the more common controls, such as those used for input and data handling.
102379
VB3, 4, 5, 6, .Net 1.1, .NET 2.0?
361276
My first instinct is that you should upgrade as the newer versions of Microsoft development environments have much better support for this stuff.\n\nBut, barring that, I'd just have to take a few guesses.  \n\nVB 6.0 was a bit touchy about how it handled APIs.  You may need to look into the variable types you're passing into the API call and its declaration - make sure you're using a current API declaration for VB 6.0 and that you have SP 6.0 installed.\n\nInternetReadFile is designed to use a buffer to pull chunks of the response back and accumulate them.  If you're trying to pull back a huge file in a single read, you may come across all kinds of limitations.   It's probably better to write something more scalable like the example below.   Pardon the formatting mess caused by this answers field.\n\n\n\nDim hInternetSession       As Long\nDim hUrlFile               As Long\nDim sReadBuffer            As String * 4096     ' Grab 4k at a time\nDim sBuffer                As String\nDim lNumberOfBytesRead     As Long\nDim bDoLoop                As Boolean\nDim sURL                   As String\n\nhInternetSession = InternetOpen("Test", _\n    INTERNET_OPEN_TYPE_PRECONFIG, vbNullString, vbNullString, 0)\n\nsURL = txtURL\nhUrlFile = InternetOpenUrl(hInternetSession, _\n    sURL, vbNullString, 0, INTERNET_FLAG_RELOAD, 0)\n\nbDoLoop = True\nWhile bDoLoop\n    sReadBuffer = scBlankStr\n    bDoLoop = InternetReadFile(hUrlFile, sReadBuffer, _\n                Len(sReadBuffer), lNumberOfBytesRead)\n    sBuffer = sBuffer & Left$(sReadBuffer, lNumberOfBytesRead)\n    If Not CBool(lNumberOfBytesRead) Then bDoLoop = False\nWend\nInternetCloseHandle (hUrlFile)\nInternetCloseHandle (hInternetSession)
389883
Windows NT (version released before Windows 2000) and Windows Server 2003 are different in many ways. Biggest changes are:\n\n1. Active Directory for User Rights Management\n2. .NET framework\n3. More Services including Terminal Service, Sharepoint services etc..\n4. Almost all services bundled with the OS have been improved. Example IIS 6.0 against IIS 4.0, IPv6 compatibility etc..\n5. Seamless UNIX compatiblity / interoperability\n6. Lots and Lots more....\n\nAn indicative Whats New is at http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/r2/whatsnewinr2.mspx\n\nAlthough this link only talks about what new from the previous version, it could give you a better idea.
721076
MS visual studio .net
584964
The steps to compile are the following:\n\n1) Install a compiler Visual Studio 2003 or 2005\n2) Unzip the source that you have downloaded\n3) click on the file with .sln (the solution file) which will open your Visual Studio and organize all the files nicely, ready to compile\n4) press F5.  If the solution and the MS Project is error free, you should get a debugging version of the application running and with all the source files compiled.
122392
The previous .Net version of VB/C#/etc supported both desktop, mobile and web applications, for .Net Framework 1.1+.  The new Visual Studio for 2005 support the .Net 2.0.\n\nMicrosoft is releasing a scaled down version of Visual Studio 2005 with just VB called Visual Basic Express 2005.  It will support the same .Net platform, but NOT do web and mobile developement, nor will it have the XML editor.\n\nSee the link below for more info...