How did the principle of interchaneable parts change the way many prouducts were made in the 1800's?
824672
look up the history of Eli Whitney. He invented the idea of interchangable parts in the U.S. when the military was in desperate need for muskets. He also invented the cotton gin later in life, a key invention that (unwittingly) prolonged slavery.
467040
In china in the early ages where they used to stuff the skin of deers and some other animals with tiny rocks and form a sphere then kick it around into small holes. It was then transfered to the british who then made it world wide and spread it all around the world..\n\nSure of it and i can bet on my life..
536066
Because over time people adapted to life in different areas of the world.
467867
The Origins of the Industrial Revolution in England\n\nThe first consequence of these developments was that cotton goods became much cheaper and were bought by all social classes. Cotton is the miracle fiber -- it is easy to clean, spin, weave and dye and is comfortable to wear. Now millions of people who had worn nothing under their coarse clothes could afford to wear cotton undergarments.\n\nSource: http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/lecture17a.html\n\n\nThe Industrial Revolution was a period of great change. new industries developed rapidly as a result of a number of new inventions and the way in which things were produced, and the way in which people lived and worked, changed rapidly as a result of these developments. \n\nIt is hard to say exactly when the Industrial revolution started or when it finished. Many factors influenced the changes that happened which makes studying the Industrial Revolution a little more complex than some other areas of History.\n\nsource: http://www.schoolshistory.org.uk/IndustrialRevolution/index.htm\n\nConsequence of the British Industrial Revolution?\nhttp://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:LY7kq6wIn90J:www.chass.utoronto.ca/~munro5/2DECNETH1.pdf+industrial+revolution+%2B+consequence&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=6\n\nThe Rise of the Industrial Revolution\nsource: http://www.costumes.org/classes/fashiondress/IndustrialRevolution.htm
1124069
a paradigm shift is required when quality or costs of traditional suppliers devalues the current product and makes it less competitive in the marketplace.  This can occur when suppliers cheapen down their costs to manufacture parts resulting in more defects than before.
1148865
They wouldn't have changed at all over the past 500 years.\n\nReal progress only happens by merging different ideas.
72377
In a short answer in the early 1800's the industral revoultion was in this peak, so they need something to transport raw materials to factories and finish products to place where it's going to be sold, that was quick, fast, and transport alot of thing, therefore the Locomotive was so important.
492726
Probably most of it will become peat, a kind of early form of coal.  Of course, glass, metal, and some plastics may not have changed change much.
195908
that's probably one of those laws that date back to the 1800's that for some reason has not been taken off the books.
346990
people started to have more free time\n\nthis is how materialism started because people could now create things to make life easier and they started making wants instead of just needs...
773010
NOTHING is built or made to stand up to how it was made back in the good ole days.\n\nCheap labor. Cheap materials. The cheapest way out so the seller can reap the benefits more.\n\nWe live in a greedy nation!
334367
* creating diferent types of synthetic fibers out of which new materials for clothing can be made.  maybe lighter clothing or warmer clothing, clothing that can change colors, things like that\n\n* development of machines and other instruments that could allow for clothes to be made more cost efficiently\n\n* as new technologies are created, new demands are placed on fashion - take the ipod for example.  wit its development, things like shirts with a ipod pocket could be created to go along with the technology\n\nthose are just some ideas
250087
I'm not sure what you mean by "evolve" in this context, but i think you're confusing standardization with evolution.  We build square houses becasue we can mass produce square parts easier than round parts (that's finally changing with laser cutters, etc.).  Also, square parts can be assembled by people with less skill and still look "professional."  The first huts were more often round or oval.  And once you start making cuts in wood, straight lines just kind of show up (try cutting a wavy line and you'll see what I mean).\n\nThere is something in our brains that likes straight lines, though.  I believe there is a hidden mathematical truth in a straight line (and a perfect circle) that feeds our higher order thinking.\n\nAnd I don't think Dr. Adam Bricker is a real doctor, but I'm just guessing.
58523
The one thing that sticks in my mind was that he invented the assembly line, which changed how things were manufactured.  Double check that, but I think that's right.
1179417
There are some heat treatments or annealing things they do with plastics that may change its strength.
294012
He made inventions that changed the world.
1104477
Certainly the electronics would have them completely baffled.  Some of the materials, particularly plastics, would be beyond them. They would also be missing modern metallurgy. They might not even notice it, but modern engines use alloys that were not in existence in the 1940's. So if they could ever get their copy to run (very doubtful, considering they'd be at a loss to duplicate the engine controls), it would wear out or break a lot sooner.\n\nThey might also have a hard time putting it together without modern robotic welding equipment. Without modern machining and casting techniques, they would probably find some of the parts very difficult to fabricate.