So what's the deal with New York cops shooting a guy 40 times on his wedding day?
813724
OH WELL THAT IS NOT MORAL AT ALL
818006
The other guy says police officers cant make any comments, but when u r a cops daughter u can......... Years ago my father was trying to catch this man who had been eluding police for quite some time.... see, he wife died 2 weeks before my dad and other officers caught him.  U may not find anything wrong with this story so far.  But when my dad finally arrested him, guess who was buckled up in the front seat???? The mans dead wife.
414396
Dude 4/20 is not supposed to be a huge party day.  You just smoke alot more than usual.  And for those people talking about cops, u got to relax they are not goin to come after u because u talk about smoking on the internet.
432091
As far as I know, Julius Hodge is not engaged to be married. He was however, involved in a shooting incident on a highway near Denver two days ago.
841034
well first of all for anyone saying that this is not happening i would like to let u know that this is not the only place in which this has happened and sadly it probably will not be the last .\n\nin my opinion this should concern to all even if u have nothing to do with the issue . the government is not respecting the law they are doing the same in a lot of situations . they do not longer fallowing the rules which are there for a reason (so you as a person are not abused and mistreated by your own government ) . what happened to those immigrants could happen to almost anyone . \n\nnot so long ago in the news they showed how they entered a home and started shooting when a person who was sleeping turn around scared and confused . they killed the guy and then found out that they had entered the wrong house . what an excuse , what a mistake which coasted the life of someone , of someone who was an exemplary member of society , because he was . he used to work every day , used to pay his taxes and never caused any problem to anyone .  \n\ncould this ever happen to you ??? it could happen to anyone if we do not start asking the government to put into effect the laws which all Americans accomplished .
976068
I guess I am qualified to answer this.  I was a police officer in London for 30 years and am somewhat unique in that I was both shot and stabbed.  I was trained to use a firearm for over 20 years.\n\nThere are several different issues here, one of which is that we select police officers based on certain criteria, none of which is their ability to use a firearm.  It therefore goes without saying that many serving officers, if not most, will not have the skills (either practical or emotional) to be armed.  We do NOT recruit people into our police forces in order for them to kill our fellow countrymen.\n\n(As far as one of the other contributors to this answer is concerned, just about the only "accidental" shooting was of Charles de Menezes, and we all know WHY he was shot.  I think everyone in the police understands that that was a terrible mistake, but the mistake was not made by the firearms officer, who acted (a) in good faith and (b) in the belief that he was protecting the lives of many other Londoners when he fired his shots.  There are several other controversial ones, but unfortunately all you ever read are headlines without knowing the full substance behind the stories.\n\nHowever, the most pressing argument against officers being routinely armed is this:  at present officers attend many incidents where physical contact is involved; pub fights, domestic arguments, theft, assault; whatever you can possibly think of where, ultimately, the police officer and the alleged criminal come into physical contact.\n\nAt present, in the vast majority of instances, such physical contact results in a peaceful arrest or solution to the dispute.  In a few it involves a scuffle or worse.  Rarely, if ever, does it involve a confrontation by the officer with a lethal weapon, for the very simple reason that most people do not carry such weapons.\n\nHowever, arm EVERY police officer and the difference is apparent.  Every single time a member of the public comes into contact with a police officer he or she has the opportunity to become an armed criminal by the very simple expedient of overpowering the officer.\n\nMany of our new breed of officers are of very slight build - the smallest I ever saw (I left in 1998) was a 4'10" girl at Brixton, who was the same size as a 12-year-old girl.  It takes very little imagination to see how just about anyone could get her gun off her.\n\nThus, with every officer armed, every single incident they ever attend has the potential to become an armed incident.  This would require a profound change of policing practice which would be only of benefit to the police officers, who would be duty bound to protect themselves, and of no benefit whatsoever to the public who they serve.  Officers would have to become very aloof and distant.  That is the total antithesis of what we expect in a British police officer.\n\nWhat we DO need is an armed response that is available at very short notice - it was always my view that the system that I left was nowhere near good enough.  I understand that armed officers are more readily available nowadays.\n\nThe other measure that could be taken to protect society (including police officers) from armed criminals is a robust sentencing policy (which we aren't going to see).  In my view, anyone arrested for carrying a knife unlawfully should go to court in the first instance.  If convicted they should receive a custodial sentence of 12 months without remission.\n\nSimilarly, anyone convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm should receive an immediate custodial sentence of 14 years imprisonment.\n\nFinally, in your example of the house where the shooting took place, the decision not to enter was nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not the officers were armed.  It was a very poor management decision by a senior officer.\n\nUnfortunately, in these days of liberal academic senior officers, many of whom are selected to fill some sort of quota, such poor dec
600309
here some article I came arcoss\n\nsomething to think about\n\nhttp://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=168993\n\nhttp://www.christiangallery.com/walsh.htm\n\nhttp://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/archive/index.php/t-17962.html\n\nJohn Walsh Does it Again!\n\nI don't watch the John Walsh show since he did his hatchet job on women who use guns to protect themselves. But as I flipped through the channels today, I saw a brief mention of the word "guns" on the Walsh Show and just had time to see a text blurb at the bottom of the screen claiming, "almost 40,000 people a year are killed by guns."\n\nOf course, this is another lie.\n\nAccording to the CDC's National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, the number of people who died from firearms-related injuries in the last reported year was 28,663.\n\nOf those, 16,586 (57%+) were suicides.\n\nNow, if you haven't figured it out by now, John Walsh isn't against guns per se. He's just against the peasants (that's you and me) having firearms. That's right, the very people he relies upon to buy his sponsor's products to support his show are the ones he wants to turn into disarmed victims.
1120910
Great question, Josh.\n\nI have had good encounters with police every single day of my life for the last 19 years.  They have been some of the hardest working, most decent, caring, giving, ethical and sensible people I have ever met.\n\nThey have been uncles and aunts to my children, they have been best friends to my wife, and they have been brothers and sisters to me.\n\nI don't know a group of people anywhere in the world I would trust more with my life or my family.\n\nHave there been exceptions?  Sure...a very few.  And you can all take heart in knowing that if you didn't like the cop you dealt with, chances are pretty good the people he/she works with don't like them either.   \n\nIt puts a hole in my heart to read some of the stories here about how some of you have dealt with police officers who have been rude, corrupt, obnoxious, liars.  I know there's bound to be some of them out there, but I haven't met them yet.  \n\nI have been - and I know no better word for it - blessed by the company I've kept for the last 19 years.  The men and women I have worked with in this profession are the most remarkable people I've ever met.\n\nJosh - thanks for the question.  Those of you who have answered with positive answers, you did this old cop some good tonight.
932716
according to the north carrolina laws, i broke three at one time and am now married to the lady. \n\nIn N.C it's if two unmarried people check into a hotell room they are now married. It is illegal to have sex between the two beds in a motel room, and While having sex, you must stay in the missionary position and have the shades pulled.\n\nIn South carolina.\nEvery adult male must bring a rifle to church on Sunday in order to ward off Indian attacks. I never did that.\n\nIt is considered an offense to get a tattoo. OOPS!\n\nLancaster County: It is illegal to dance in public. I LIVE HERE, i'm screwed!\n\nWhen approaching a four way or blind intersection in a non-horse driven vehicle you must stop 100 ft from the intersection and discharge a firearm into the air to warn horse traffic. NEVER DID THAT EITHER. OUTA TRY IT THOUGH!
781113
I agree. This has happened in my town twice in the last 8 months, and both times they killed the men. One of them was my husband( I am not in any way joking). He was   the most wonderful man I have ever met in my life, and would never hurt anybody. He was following orders when he was shot, but the cops weren't communicating with each other very well, so within 10 seconds (literally)  my husband was gone. All thanks to a  jumpy, cop high on adrenaline. My husband was not armed, and he did not try to attack. I honestly don't know how they are getting away with it either, if  it was anybody else, they wouldn't. I'm sorry, but I just don't think that having a badge and a gun entitles ANYONE to take the life of someone else.
160754
im sure everyone has their own opinon, in mine i would have to agree with you. the police just have this cocky way of doing things...why? bc they wear a uniform. in my home town a few weeks ago two officers shot and killed an african american man. they were both white. they went to arrest him with a warrant of violation of probation. why were there two guys? they say he ran inside and hid in the bathroom with a shot gun. come to find out he didnt even own a gun and was babysitting his 5 year old nephew.... they shot him while he was holding his nephew....thats screwed up...
773628
As an Ex-illegal Allien, a now a USA citizen, working for law enforcemets for many years...now very retired...I can tell you one thing...fake marriages usually 90% back-fire to the immigrant that seeking a way to stay in USA...because usually the other side that gets involved in this kind of scim is greedy and very dishonest...so soon or later the immigration service gets aware of the situation...DUE TO THE PROBLEMS THAT CREATE BOTH PARTIES with the LOCAL POLICE AUTHORITIES AND COURTS.and then is no mercy on his or her efforts to stay in USA.
144577
Do a search on Yahoo. The guy is fine and jokes about it. The media can't get over it yet. They will (eventualy)
698937
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-6cLovllX4\n\nI didn't even see it or hear about it and utube has dropped the video.  this is all I could find. \n\n\nI don't think in the end it will hurt his image to much.   Celebrities can literally get away with murder.  It will all be quiet soon
250399
He has 12 children and has been married 4 times.
726698
I'm certain he is guilty. What kind of innocent person would lead the cops to chase after him for a long time after he lied and told them he would turn himself in? There were no other suspects that the police could find, and guilty people are let free a lot. The problem seems to be the amendment in the Consitution that says that a person can't be tried twice (double jeopardy), even if substatial evidence amounts against that person. I have heard a lot of rumors that a murder weapon was found, but that eveidence is now usless thanks to that amendment. Rich people like him can afford the best of lawyers, and his lawyer certainly was no amateur. He helped many other famous people walk free, and your lawyer runs most of the show at a trial. He knows all of the loopholes and how to bring his client out of a hole.
823784
THE GUY IS A DISCUSSING SLUG. IF I WERE YOU I WOULDN'T GIVE HIM THE TIME, BUSINESS, NOR ATTENTION (AND MONEY TOO !!!) HE IS BEGGING FOR !!!\n\nHE'S JUST TRYING TO MAKE MONEY OFF THESE MURDERS !!! (AND ONE OF THEM BEING THE MOTHER OF HIS CHILDREN !!!)