Please educate me on stipulation agreement?
821754
If you are party to a court matter that you don't think you should be involved in, then you need to get an attorney and notify the court of what you think is happening.\n\nHowever, it may also be the situation where the original case is still listed as active because it is stayed (paused) while your new agreement with agent-B is being resolved. This is common, and the court should be able to tell you what the actual current status of your case is. Just contact the clerk of the court, or have a lawyer do so to be sure.
442311
I believe it depends on what is written in your contract.  I recommend asking a professional (i.e. attorney).
730794
It might be helpful if you look at other reports to get an idea... try this link to a whole list of links that matched "negotiation report"\n\nhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=negotiation+report
572847
Did you read the "fine print" in the loan contract? Looks like you need a lawyer.
743857
The purchase agreement needs to have a clause specifying that the terms are contingent on financing.  If not...you may be in trouble.
839429
ask what the cost to buy into this is (the start up cost). ask about the  term of the agreement, ask amout what kind of help they are going to give you to help this business get up and running? Good luck
752638
try looking up this word:  Infofax\n then try these sites: www.usdoj.gov/deal/concern/\n                               www.theantidrug.com
767218
Unless there is some kind of fraud involved, contracts that "auto-renew" are perfectly legit.  Contractual terms can be basically anything that the parties want them to be, and if those terms include a provision for automatic renewal, you got it.
1111501
Depending on situations- Is there anything that refers to this situation in the " terms of agreement "?\nIs there any indication that remaining merchandise is on back order? B/O\nIf so that business can not refuse shipment.
177887
Contact a legal nurse, who can draw up an agreement. Also, an attorney can do this.
913250
Yes. Though you will have to provide DOB and other information if they make an offer.
248520
If you have a contractual agreement, you should be able to confirm what they can and can't do. \n\nIf not, walk away.
752744
I suppose that you are in the UK.\n\nI would disregard the answers here unless they identify themselves as knowledgable in British Common Law.\nI just took my contracts final today in American Law, and we have the Uniform Commercial Code which changed a few things found in Common Law.  For one, you don't need to have mutual assent to have a contract.  You can have unilateral contracts, you can have promisory estoppel, you can have quantum mertuit etc.  There is no mutuality here because the advertisement doesn't name a specific person.  If it had said, "I will sell these CDs to the first person who replies"  then the parties would be identifiable.  I can name several American cases that refer to this example, but that wouldn't help you.  I have an English Contracts case book from 1887, which belonged to my great great grandfather, but that won't help you either.\n\nThis question would best be handled on the American side with\nHARVEY V. FACEY\nThe court held here that there must be a definite offeror and offeree for there to be a contract.  This is applied to advertisements as well.  An advertisement is generally held to be an invitation for an offer rather than an offer because it is not definite enough.  If the ad had said, first person to call me gets it then it would be an offer because the offeree could be easily identified (LEFKOWITZ V. GREAT MINN. STORE)\n\nIn America, Gaz could sell his CDs to any of the ladies he chose, or he could reject their offers.  Each of the ladies gave an offer with different terms: 2000 and pick up in 2 weeks, 2000 immediate pick up, 1500.\n\nLike I wrote, however, this would be the American view.  I could go on and on about how the UCC would apply, but this would be wasting your time.\n\nIn a hypothetical, you must analyze each person's position, and then put in your own facts.  What if Gaz sold to one of the ladies, what could the others do?  Which offers were valid?  Look at the methods of acceptances, counter offers are rejections and an offer.\n\nBecause this is a sale of goods, you have to address the statute of frauds whether someone will be successful or not. (remember the acronym MY LEGS, it's the G part)\n\nI'm killing myself now because I just realized that an option contract is binding under the mail box rule upon receipt.  I got that one wrong arrrgh.\n\nOk I'm done with the law for at least a week, time to hit the pub and get smashed
293292
Go to the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE).  Here's a link for you to review...good luck.
176349
I might be interested. How much money would be in my end of the deal?
806169
if it looks like this.. then yes..\n\nEMPLOYEE LOAN AGREEMENT\n\n\n        THIS EMPLOYEE LOAN AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into as of the\n30th day of April, 2001, by and between INKTOMI CORPORATION, a Delaware\ncorporation (the "Company"), and EDWARD AUGUSTUS HALLY ("Employee") and MARGARET\nELIZABETH MASTERSON (the wife of Employee), who are together herein referred to\nas the "Borrowers".\n\n\n                                    RECITALS\n\n                A. Employee is employed by the Company as its Senior Vice\nPresident and General Manager of the Content Networking Solutions Group.\n\n                B. Borrowers have found it necessary to relocate their residence\nin order for Employee to become an employee of the Company.\n\n                C. The Company and Borrowers desire that the Company lend to\nBorrowers the sum of One Million Seven Hundred Thirty-Five Thousand Dollars\n($1,735,000.00) to assist Borrowers in purchasing a new principal residence.\n\n        NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Borrowers agree as follows:\n\n\n                                    AGREEMENT\n\n        PAYMENT: The Company will lend to Borrowers the amount of One Million\nSeven Hundred Thirty-Five Thousand Dollars ($1,735,000.00) (the "Loan"), which\namount shall be used by Borrowers for the sole purpose of purchasing a new\nresidence located at 17 Acorn Lane in the City of Los Altos, County of Santa\nClara, California (the "Property") pursuant to the terms and conditions set\nforth herein.\n\n        CONDITIONS PRECEDENT: The Company's obligation to extend the Loan to\nBorrowers pursuant to this Agreement is expressly conditioned upon the\nsatisfaction of or waiver by the Company of all of the following conditions\nprecedent, each of which is exclusively for the benefit of the Company:\n\n        Borrowers shall have delivered to the Company each of the following\n(herein referred to as "Loan Documents"):\n\n        One (1) original promissory note in the amount of One Million Seven\nHundred Thirty-Five Thousand Dollars ($1,735,000.00) in substantially the same\nform as Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Note"), with all uncompleted information\nfully completed; and\n\n        One (1) fully executed, validly acknowledged deed of trust and the rider\nthereto, encumbering the Property as security for the Note, in substantially the\nsame form as Exhibit B attached hereto, with all uncompleted information fully\ncompleted (the "Deed of Trust"); and\n\n\n\n                                      -1-\n<PAGE>   2\n\n        Two (2) fully executed Promissory Note and Truth-In-Lending Disclosures,\nin substantially the same form as Exhibit C attached hereto, with all\nuncompleted information fully completed (the "Truth-in-Lending"); and\n\n        Two (2) fully executed Certificates of Employee, in substantially the\nsame form as Exhibit D attached hereto, with all uncompleted information fully\ncompleted (the "Employee Certificate").\n\n        Lender shall have received from First American Title Guaranty Company\n(the "Title Company") a title insurance policy insuring the Deed of Trust in the\namount of the Note as a first lien on the Property, subject only to the\nexceptions to title described in Items Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 of that certain\nPreliminary Report prepared by the Title Company, dated April 5, 2001, and\nbearing Order No. 660189, and including the following title insurance\nendorsements: 100, 103.7, and 110.9.\n\n        Lender shall have received an appraisal in form and prepared by an\nappraiser approved by Lender determining that the appraised value of the\nProperty is at least $1,735,000.00.\n\n        Lender shall have received a copy of a U.S. FIRPTA certificate, and the\nstate equivalent certificate, executed by Dr. Eugene Bauer and Gloria Bauer,\nacceptable to Lender and providing that no withhold
506558
Might want to start by taking a course in reading and writing.  That way you can understand legal contracts better, otherwise your plan may just backfire.