what is a listening contract?
820152
Never heard of it, are you sure you spelt it correctly.
587358
Listening and enlisting. :)
320952
A plea agreement is a contract between the disputing parties that must be accepted by the trier of law before it can have a legal effect.  So, the judge is not bound to accept a plea bargain, but any statements or admissions made in furtherence of such an agreement are not admissible should the trial continue.
279491
Listen account is used to  accept  connections, where a  socket is first created with socket, a willingness to accept incoming connections and a queue limit for incoming connections are specified with listen, and then the connections are accepted with accept. I could be wrong.
362298
Try here:\n\nhttp://www.valueoptions.com/provider/contractspecific/voc/monitoring.pdf
805941
it depends on the contract you signed.
997380
Give one months notice, and you should be fine, its consumer contract so any clause will be subject to reasonableness test in schedule 2 of ucta. (unfair contract terms act 1977)\n\nWhere a contract has very onerous terms then those terms should specifically be brought to your attention. Even if they were the law will not allow the inequality of bargaining power since you are contracting on their standard terms, so every clause has to be reasonable.\n\nIf the service is substantially different to what is promised then that is a repudiatory breach of contract and you should be entitled to rescind the contract, effectively be brought back into the position before the contract.\n\nI would suggest give notice to terminate on the grounds that they have failed to perform their end of the bargain, if they do not agree you may go to a solicitor and negotiate that way. It depends how much money is involved, whether you should go for small claims or not. \n\nWrite a letter to the company detailing your issues, and say you have all evidence in writing, and wait and see, more than likely they will back out. Even if they issue proceeding from what you have described you have a good counterclaim.
1083612
You have to have purchased a subscription already; then you can also listen on your computer.
1148097
This isn't very clear.   However, you might have an oral contract, such as, "if you do this, I'll do that", and Person B goes ahead and does it.  For example, if Person A says, "I'll buy your car for $5000 if you will have it tuned up and get it to pass state inspection." and you go ahead and get the work done.  Person A may be stuck with a contract to buy your car.  I don't know if this is close enough--you can email me if your situation is different.
954218
uSSUALY CONTRACTS HAVE A CLAUSE AND IT SAYS THE TIME FOR SENDING THIS LETTER, anyway  the letter should sayu:\nAccording to our contract date ....... by this mean I wan to finish it, since .......... As the contract says. \nthanking you in advance,\ntrully yours,
613297
Profoundly deaf - need for communication and attention from another person\nCDLA/3360/95\n\nhttp://www.lawcentreni.org/Library/dla.htm\n\nI hope this helps
767553
A Record Contract, money, fame
1055686
A verbal contract is just as valid as a written one.  Especially if that person knows the conversation is being recorded.  But laws vary state to state, so I would look up your state's contract laws on line.
1161168
The validity of the contract will not be affected by the place of signing or preparartion.\n\nFor other details u should explain the nature of arrangement.
752744
I suppose that you are in the UK.\n\nI would disregard the answers here unless they identify themselves as knowledgable in British Common Law.\nI just took my contracts final today in American Law, and we have the Uniform Commercial Code which changed a few things found in Common Law.  For one, you don't need to have mutual assent to have a contract.  You can have unilateral contracts, you can have promisory estoppel, you can have quantum mertuit etc.  There is no mutuality here because the advertisement doesn't name a specific person.  If it had said, "I will sell these CDs to the first person who replies"  then the parties would be identifiable.  I can name several American cases that refer to this example, but that wouldn't help you.  I have an English Contracts case book from 1887, which belonged to my great great grandfather, but that won't help you either.\n\nThis question would best be handled on the American side with\nHARVEY V. FACEY\nThe court held here that there must be a definite offeror and offeree for there to be a contract.  This is applied to advertisements as well.  An advertisement is generally held to be an invitation for an offer rather than an offer because it is not definite enough.  If the ad had said, first person to call me gets it then it would be an offer because the offeree could be easily identified (LEFKOWITZ V. GREAT MINN. STORE)\n\nIn America, Gaz could sell his CDs to any of the ladies he chose, or he could reject their offers.  Each of the ladies gave an offer with different terms: 2000 and pick up in 2 weeks, 2000 immediate pick up, 1500.\n\nLike I wrote, however, this would be the American view.  I could go on and on about how the UCC would apply, but this would be wasting your time.\n\nIn a hypothetical, you must analyze each person's position, and then put in your own facts.  What if Gaz sold to one of the ladies, what could the others do?  Which offers were valid?  Look at the methods of acceptances, counter offers are rejections and an offer.\n\nBecause this is a sale of goods, you have to address the statute of frauds whether someone will be successful or not. (remember the acronym MY LEGS, it's the G part)\n\nI'm killing myself now because I just realized that an option contract is binding under the mail box rule upon receipt.  I got that one wrong arrrgh.\n\nOk I'm done with the law for at least a week, time to hit the pub and get smashed
1101272
yes they can read your contracts VERY carefully before signing also know your rights as a consumer in your state go to your states website and search for the fconsumer rights section.
92520
In Black’s Law Dictionary an Oral Contract is defined as:\n\nOne which is partly in writing and partly depends on spoken words, or none of which is in writing; one which, so far as it has been reduced to writing, is incomplete or expresses only part of what is intended, but is completed by spoken words; or one which, originally written, has afterwards been changed orally.\n\nIn short, such a contractual dispute would go before the law (court, mediator, magistrate, etc.) and that which could be proven as agreement between the parties to the contract )written or oral) would be the rule.  There are other factors , but if you can demonstrate to the court that there was a “meeting of the minds” it can be inforced.