Can someone help me this "supposedly" math problem?
824818
OK, here goes:\n\nThe data could be\n7 9 10 12 12 13 14\n\nThe median (center number) is 12\nThe mode (most repeated number) is 12\nThe mean (average) is 11.\n\nThe point is that you need to look at all three measures to get a good idea of the data.\n\nHere's another set:\n1 3 10 12 12 19 20\nThis has the same measurements.\n\nIt is only when we look at things like the variance and std deviation that we can really see the difference between those two data sets.\n\nGood luck!
1118957
The first number has to be (x+6) and the second number is (x).  There are four possible combinations: 6,0 (60); 7,1 (71); 8,2 (82); 9,3 (93).  60 plus 8 (68) does not equal 06, or 6.  71 plus 8 does not equal 17.  82 plus 8 does not equal 28.  93 plus 8 does not equal 39.\nUnfortunately, this problem is impossible.\nSorry I couldn't be of more help.
663777
SOrry, I can't help you. If I had the formulas I could do it, but there is no way I remember that off the top of my head! Good luck
858530
it is possible when X=33.02163079..... try it
358699
Please visit http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/52240.html
779526
How are you even sure that such a function exists? the numbers look very random.
604123
I figured it out... the answer is 1/(13*(2-3x))\nIf you need an explanation tell me
1186783
You can't really solve it - all you can get is x+y=31.54875
925132
TimGNO is correct, although a pedant would point out that he hasn't shown this point is a maximum.  But  it is common sense.  See my response to the second time you asked the question, I got the same answer (foolishly mucking around with tangents), but make a couple of other observations you may wish to look at.
1066144
Without the knowledge of where point e is, this problem is insolvable.\n\nI suspect, however, from a brief diagramming session, that you will need to solve for the length of ab using the Pythagorean Theorem, and set up similar triangles.
1102516
by any chance is this a question from your maths homework? lol :D\n\nI cant work it out myself because to put it simple, im crap at maths.
60599
This is not an equation.  Its garbage.  Both side of the equation have to equal each other.\n-35=.000075 this does not compute
1094108
Use a calculator and raise it to the 1/3 power.\nDon't try to do it by hand...
1053054
Use the binomial.  I've already shown you how in a previous question.  And you already know that you need to use it.
842997
No... though some my say M+Y=L... but that's not realistic. Plus this is under math, and it should be science. Ask your friends about it. You're not going to recieve much comfort on this site with a question like that.
51150
UGH!!!  Thx for the effort (I was the one to post that question, as a part of a solution to another problem I found here on Yahoo! Answers.)  Incidentally, I made a mistake when simplifying the other problem and it should be xln(2)-2ln(x)-ln(86400) = 0\n\nI don't know any way to get rid of the ln(x) unless maybe it's using calculus techniques?  I'm just glad this problem is making other ppl trouble about it as much as I did :-).
1065017
I'm writing up a proof right now that this is not possible.\n\nCheck out the pdf at:\nhttp://www.geocities.com/euleratuo/