critically examine the arguements for the reformation of united nations system?
814237
The United Nations actively pursues anti-American policies and appeases America's enemies, while being largely funded by $3 billion worth of annual American dues. After revealing the depth of rampant corruption in the UN, it is time to recognize the changes in Old Europe and redesign America's alliances that line up with America's national interests. \n\nIf John Kerry and Hillary Clinton have their way, Kofi Annan and Jacques Chirac will gain veto power over American foreign policy. Scared? You should be. It could happen. And in Inside the Asylum, former deputy undersecretary of defense Jed Babbin shows just how it could happen and why the UN deserves the nickname "The Asylum." \n\nIn the Asylum... \n\n* the UN assists international terrorists. Babbin exposes the shocking links between the UN and terrorist organizations. \n\n* The money trail from the UN to Saddam Hussein. It is time to rip the veil from the outrageous Oil-for-Food program-proving that the UN sold its moral legitimacy for oil, stuffed its own pockets at the expense of the Iraqi people, and undermined American pressure on Saddam Hussein: the UN's cash cow. The UN's Oil-for-Food program, provided Saddam Hussein with the means to bribe politicians, to deprive his people of needed food and medicine, and to literally steal billions of dollars. There is even emerging evidence that money from the program might have gone to support al-Qaeda. \n\n• The UN's raid on the American Treasury: dominated by Third World staffers who consider the United States Treasury "the common heritage of mankind." Kofi Annan, the UN secretary-general, is an anti-American moral relativist who misses no opportunity to arrogate power from the United States to the UN. \n\n* The United Nations and the European Union are morally bankrupt-and open enemies of the United States. France and the United Nations have cost American lives in Iraq by their perverse delaying of American action in the Iraq War. American troops are fighting and dying today because of a terrorist strategy Saddam Hussein developed while France and the United Nations delayed Operation Iraqi Freedom. \n\nThe UN is more of an international criminal than a dispenser of legitimate international law. If America wants to retain its sovereignty and security, it's time to escape from the UN asylum and say goodbye to the false friends of Old Europe. We owe no tribute to the UN and the EU, We should not be ashamed and divided to look after our own defense." \n\nThe United Nations building in Manhattan is an international enclave, no longer American territory. Inside the Asylum is a powerful argument that it's time to reclaim that land for America.
825998
I think the idea of the UN matches exactly how it handles major problems (genocide in action).  Its a great idea that some intellects with great ideas for humanity discuss with great passion and get together and chat about how to make things better.  But, then you hand them a decision that requires the violence to matched in order to be humane and they can't do it.  Easier to sit on the side lines and Monday morning quarterback than to strap one on and put it on the line.\n\nSo, what are the good for?  Nothing we shoudl request they relocate to Paris.
561027
Without a doubt, revolution. Most people won't simply reform of their own accord whether in a group setting or as an individual. As long as their are two or more opposing sides I believe that there must first be an agreement of what is it that needs to be reformed. You cannot reach this agreement however if the two parties simply refuse to agree. Therefore the revolution comes first, and then reformation. My humble opinion.
878680
The goal of the United Nations was to increase discussion between nations in an effort to prevent global conflict.  But has it worked or does it really have any jurisdiction over its members, no.  Many nations, such as the United States of America, have failed to ratify much of the UN charter.  For example, the US has not ratified the International Criminal Court, a separate judiciary entity somewhat affiliated with the UN.  However, the UN does play a somewhat integral part in maintaining communication with outside nations. A great example is the UN's efforts to aid with peacekeeping in Darfur.  Though this is seemingly unsuccessful, the UN has worked to maintatin the prescence of peacekeeping troops in the region. \n\nHowever, this leads to more problems.  Throughout the years, peacekeeping troops have been known to rape their refugees and commit other inappropriate acts during their mission. This increases the negative opinion of the UN and its actions among nations.  In addition, when nations such as the US blatantly violate the charter and the UN declarations, it suggests the ignorance of global opinion. These events lead to greater tension between nations instead of increased pacifism, as the body is designed for. \n\nNo nation, due to the act of sovereignty, must abide by the laws of the UN.  This is solely because if the rules of the UN were more heavily imposed than national law, prominent UN nations, the UK, US, France, etc., would have greater precedence in the domestic politics of smaller nations, such as Swaziland.  This would lead to an almost imperialistic setting where global superpowers would be able to enact laws that colonized developing nations and poverished nations.\n\nI hope this answers your question!
677198
The United Nations websites might give you some perspective on this issue.
18613
For detail, read my studies below. I will give you a few basic last days concepts and corresponding technology.\n\nThere needs to be a way to see the abomination that makes desolation for all the world to see. - Satellite TV (the new temple plans have closed circuit cameras)\n\nGlobal scanning and tracking of worlds financial transactions. GPS, GIS, underskin ID, computers-internet, secure online payment.\n\nDesire to unite under one global religion - Todays ecumenical movement.\n\nAbility to destroy an entire city in one hour - Nuclear weapons\n\nJewish people are required to be back in the land as a country with all nations poised against her. Note: The UN has condemned Israel hundreds of times and is the only country banned from participating in the UN process.\n\nThe above would not be possible even 70 years ago. Almost all that is needed technology-wise for the last days scenario is ready.
1032679
the best way is have a deep look at the reports that created by the UN...\n\nthey are named as : "Human Development Report" \n\nsearch on the web and u will find what u want, it's useful
476259
If there exists considerable doubt, ask for reasoning. If still in doubt, try a change.\nhttp://watchtower.org In many languages
553749
There are many changes I would like to see by the end of the 21st century. Changes with peace, hunger, AIDs, the list goes on and on. If I had to pick three these would be it : ____,____, and ____.\n\nthat can be a help for the 1st paragraph. the next 3 paragraps can tell what you'd change & why. The last can be the 1st paragraph re-worded.
333672
I would guess many NGOs would practice "diplomacy."  Same with IGOs.  They are of increasing influence in the world stage.
148743
The United Nations is a debating society, and cannot agree on hardly anything.  How would we define "the world community?"  And how would YOU define the Kashmir issue?
594048
Whatever it is, it is too much.  We need to kick that sham organization out of the U.S. and stop paying dues to what has become a total joke.  The U.N. is useless and is actually an impediment to getting anything done globally.
1006922
NO IT CAN'T, BUT THE POLITICAL SIDE OF THE UNITED NATIONS CAN SHOW HOW FREE IT IS, BY SIMPLY ALLOWING PEOPLE THE OPPORTUNITY OF DIFFERENT IDEAS TO THINK ABOUT WITHOUT INTERUPTING.EXAMPLE IF YOU CHOSE H3LL FINE IT DOES'NT MEAN ANYONE ELSE CREATED IT FOR YOU.THAT'S ALSO LIKE SAYING IF YOUR READING YOUR BIBLE AND YOU WIND-UP AT THE PEARLY GATES IT DOES'NT NECESARILY MEAN YOU AND EVERYONE ELSE IS DEAD, OR ALL ANGLES...DIFFERENT TIPS FOR DIFFERENT FOLKS.
1078463
Yes. The U.N. is primarily made up of countries that would have to be considered as run by dictators.  Nothing good can come from such an organisation.  We cling to it in hope of it fullfilling its inteded purpose.  We should accept its failure or get rid of the countries that are not in compliance with the founding principals. As it is, it is only a way of helping evil prevail.
415228
Also try: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_nations
104026
The Model United Nations Alumni Society will host James J. Patton, Esq., adjunct professor at the University of Maryland School of Law, as the first speaker of the 2006 Global Affairs Lecture Series on Monday, Feb. 20 at 6 p.m. at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC). His topic will be international trade law and related contemporary issues.\n\nIn a prepared statement to the press, Patton said, “International trade and our government’s policies towards economic engagement with the world are critical drivers of both improving quality of life in financial terms and increasing global stability in a period of increasing uncertainty.”\n\nPatton is the Acting Director of Maritime, Cargo and Trade Policy within the Department of Homeland Security, where his portfolio includes International Trade and Cargo Security issues, working in such areas as Operation Safe Commerce, Customs-Trade Partnership against Terrorism, Container Security Initiative, and developing private sector and international support for container security programs. He serves as Designated Federal Official for the Departmental Advisory Committee on the Commercial Operation of Customs and Border Protection and as a US delegate for World Trade Organization negotiations on trade facilitation.\n\nThe goal of the Global Affairs Lecture Series is to examine the conduct of foreign policy and to explore the configuration of forces (economic, political, social and environmental) now shaping global affairs. In so doing, the series will consider the responses of national governments, international agencies, and trans-national business and service entities.
974548
The UN is a toy for the rich countries that keep it in existence.  Without funding from the US, the UN would be even less viable than it is now.  Do you have an example of this toying or is it just your impression?