Does stephen speilberg play with his sticky wicket?
815957
What makes you think his wicket is sticky?  It could be smooooooove and well greased.
637232
yes the offcial award is given to Sarwan for finding his form back. \nbut it should go to Greg Chappel for letting a boogie team like WI white wash the ODIs.
710629
The reverse hook. Shane Warne plays it well. he's understands hookers quite well.\n\nSeriously, it's the on-drive-through-midwicket off a leg-spinner. Nobody can do it better than VVS Laxman.\n\nAnd stop astrixing your questions.
341833
uh !!!!! whatever knowledge I have abt cricket is when u hit a wicket u get a batsman down...  If u get them all down u win..
568547
Y E S.\nHIS NOT FAMILIOUR TO SMASH BALLS QUICKLY.\n\nHE IS BLOCKING MOST OF THE BALLS...BY DOING THIS HE PRESSURISE THE LATE ORDER BATSMEN.\n\nHE IS NOT ROTATE THE STRIKE TOO.\nSO THAT, THE BOWLER HAS THE CUSHION TO KEEP CONTAINING.
520676
yes,he should because when he was captain he plays good cricket even now also.ups and downs always come in the way of good cricketer.when sunil gavaskar was not in form but he has done a good captainship.so he should play as a captian.i admire him.
159920
I think thats coz Sachin succombs to pace and classy swing.\nRazzaq bowls an expert reverse swing & Akthar is an expert scorcher
343148
Muralitharan has a defective action his bends more than the 15 degree angle that bowlers are permitted when he delivers the ball. Same is the case for Shoaib Akhtar, Jermaine Lawson, Shabbir Ahmed but guys, why did you forget Kyle Mills?\nMurali & Mills do throw the ball. Mills, because he is not asian will never be reported. While Murali has cited disability for his bending of the arm. But think of the amount of exessise turn & bounce he generates. He turns around matches on it's head because he has an unfair advantage. \nMY arguement is:::\nIf Murali is granted pardon because he cites disability, then why doesn't the air-force recruit pilots with specs.Disability cannot be cited as an excuse. Am I wrong anywhere??
648255
NO.\nITS TOO TOUGH.\nAUSSIES HAVE TO FACE VERY STRONG CONTENDERS THIS TIME.\nS.A. IS ONE OF THEM WHICH HAS MANY WORLD CLASS ALL-ROUNDERS.\nWHICH IS THE ESSENTIAL ONE TO WIN ODI'S NOW A DAYS.
327245
AN INJURED BIRD NEVER FLY HIGH AS BEFORE..\n\nEVEN THOUGH..HE WILL BE THE FAR BETTER BATSMAN.
288973
Of course.  If the batsman is out of his ground (i.e he has no part of his foot or bat behind the batting crease), is not attempting a run and the keeper breaks the stumps at the striker's end, he is out stumped.  It does not matter if the keeper throws underarm, overarm or simply hits the wicket with the ball in his glove - the result is the same.  However it is highly unlikely the batsman will be far enough out of his ground for the wicket keeper to thrown down the stumps particularly with an over arm throw.  In summary, the reply is 'yes, but it's unlikely'.  The previous answers differentiating between 'stumped' and 'run out' are misleading.\n\nFurther to all people saying it would be 'run out', then NOT NECESSARILY!!! The definition of a stumping is:\n\nIn cricket, a batsman can be out stumped if:\n\nthe wicket-keeper puts down the wicket, while \nthe batsman is: \nout of his ground (because he has moved down the pitch beyond the popping crease, usually in an attempt to hit the ball), \nreceiving a delivery which is not a no ball, and \nnot attempting a run. \n\nYOU HAVE TO BE ATTEMPTING A RUN TO BE RUN OUT!!!!  Therefore a batsman CAN be out stumped and NOT run out from an overarm throw by the wicketkeeper if he is not attempting a run.  End of chat.
452175
YES.\nOCCASIONALLY HE DOES WHILE RELEASING THE BALL.\nTHE GRUNT WILL DIVERT BATSMAN'S ATTENTION LITTLE BIT.
1131347
Without any sort of thinking , I can say the answer to this question as YES. He is leading wicket taker for India both in Tests and ODIs. He still can win matches for India. Giving a place in the World Cup team will be best way to acknowledge the greatest spinner of modern day Indian cricket who was always sidelined both by media and selectors!
63067
why'd you put this in cricket? i dont know how to help you.
462803
IF IT IS A RAHUL DRAVID CENTURY, ITS AQUIRED.\nIF IT IS A SEHWAG CENTURY ITS A (FIELDING)TEAM WORK.
592732
This term comes from the game of cricket - played on a pitch called a 'wicket'.\n\nWhen the wicket becomes 'sticky' the bowler gets the ball to move much more making it very difficult for the batsmen to score runs and not get 'out'.\n\nSo, if you are on a sticky wicket you are considered to be in a very difficult position in order to achieve your objective.
323345
Very economical. he may not be consistent but does either get wickets or bowls economically. Definitely deserves and earns his place on the team till next world cup. If he can be destructive in west indes, it would be great