Anybody who knows about direct variation?
820734
direct variation equation is y=xk  (whereby "k" is constant) \n\ny=21    x=7  (sub these numbers into the equation)\n\n21=7k\n\nsolving for k\nk=3
1135408
OH NOES THIS IS LIKE A MATH PROBLEM!!!! i can't handle any more variables :( sry.\n\n\nhahahaha.
268119
To answer that question you would have to know if the differences between "having a variation" and "not having the variation" are normally distributed.  If so, you could make an assumption on the number to look at based on normal distribution and 3 standard deviations.\n\nIf there is no normal distribution to the data, then you would have to determine your own "statistics" for the odds that the deviation would occur, and calculate the number based on the possible number of "variations" that could occur, versus the odds that any one could occur.
862418
Is there supposed to be a letter after 20,000?\n\nIf not, then you could say that 89.2% of the variation in y is explained by its relationship with a.
938555
Different makes, and even different models from the same manufacturer, do differ.  I know this, as I have written the software for one model.  In fact, the algorithms used are a commercial secret, guarded carefully between manufacturers.  This is also the reason I am unable to provide more data, or references.\n\nYou may be able to find them for yourself, though.  Good luck.
990409
No. You are either complete or not. There is no variation. You can't be slightly complete, as there is only one way of being complete. Therefore if you are not complete you are definatly incomplete.\n\nAnyway, entirely incomplete sounds nicer ;-)
225578
the direct x and the dot net framework,
390725
varies wildly by state
379771
http://www.mikeholt.com/mojonewsarchive/EC-HTML/HTML/WyeTransformerCalculations~20030916.htm
472713
I don think the amount of blending wud make any difference. But that doesn mean u wud get the same result if u don blend at all. U've to blend at least to a minimal extent.\n\nDifferent source, if u mean from different species, then there shud obviously different result. There are differences in cellular structures, presence of cell wall..... blah blah blah
45901
making someting with the same genetic makeup as the original
335615
Yes, often there is inherent recessive genes that happen to come to surface irregularrly... there may also be protein production differences in that different processes are set off at different times.
229858
if you had an inverse variation, then x*y would always be the same number.\n\nif you had a direct variation, then x/y (or y/x) would always be the same number.\n\nonce you know which variation you have, then use the equations y=kx (for direct) and y=k/x (for inverse) to find the relation
467756
revision? edition? correction? amendment?
567497
No. Variation only indicates limited change.  Yes, there is indeed variation, but as far as such drastic changes as Evolution indicates, the changes that must occur for Evolution to be true do not occur.  The change is not that drastic.\n\nThere are limits to the changes.  Our own tampering with fruits and vegetables show that we may "create" a new fruit or vegetable, but seeds will not be produced.  It is because we have caused an unnatural thing to be produced.  \n\nYes, there are definite "Laws".
771697
Try Google or Yahoo.  You'll find worked examples there.  I think it needs diagrams to understand; they and the accompanying explanations are too complex to attempt to reproduce here.
799966
the external angle\n\ni hope that this helps