We all know O J did it, its not even question did he do it, its how he got away with it?
822193
The key is the bloody clothes, someone helped him or did it for him, why hasn't the federal government prosecuted him for violating Nicole and Ron's Civil Rights? This was a Hate Crime.
1165565
you could make it simple and just ask him when he did it.
172477
If u dont explain the situation then only god knows what Chris doing.
913727
He WILL be hung, or shot, or whatever way they choose to go about killing him.  An automatic appeal might matter in other cases, but who honestly believes he will be found innocent?  LOL!  I think everyone was happy when they caught him, because we all knew he would pay.  It's no surprise to me that he was found guilty.
909805
It depends on what they did.\nIf they provided the means, or assisted the person, they are criminally responsible.
1046406
no, but he probably had his hands in it.........
751664
I've been an attorney since 1993.  O.J. Simpson was found not guilty in the criminal case and was found liable in the civil case.  Those are verdicts that we have to live with.  The terms "guilty" and "not guilty" have narrow legal meanings.  A verdict of "not guilty" is not a declaration of innocence...it only means the jury felt that the prosecution failed to to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty.\n\nThere is no question that OJ murdered those two people.  His blood was and the crime seen and there blood was at his house.  There is simply no way that the police could have planted this evidence.\n\nI highly recommend a book called  Outrage: The Five Reasons Why O.J. Simpson Got Away With Murder.  It covers of great detail the mistakes made by the prosecution in this case.\n\nAnd by the way, Johnnie Cochrane was a very average lawyer in my opinion.
828914
it was hidden, or not true, or he didnt die
479622
THEY SAW HIM DO IT YOU IDIOT!!!
632205
Only George knows for sure, but I suspect that he wasn't raised right.  He's never once taken responsibility for the things he's done.  In his mind, everyone else was doing it, so that makes it OK.  Trouble is, he got caught, and most likely he was turned in by his political buddies.  Hard to believe somebody as old as he is doesn't know any better.  I thought the older generations were supposed to have better morals.  He disgraced himself, his family and friends, and everyone in the state of Illinois.
107545
You've not really asked a question, you are making a statement. Why the officer committed a crime is something only he can answer.
5860
isn't it already a passive voice? \n(He didn't perform the action himself, right)
89295
I didn’t see that question.  Who knows if he REALLY did it? If he really did do it, then, wow, that really sucks, and so does he.
926877
you are in denial.   of course he did it.    post the details of his crime.  if you refuse to do so it proves my point.and by the way, unless he is on death row the innocence project won't return your phone call.
60584
Do you think one of them did it?
266007
Yes, I think he knew the Who, when, where and how! He did nothing to stop it! I think that he was involved!
990821
C'mon.. What about the btcih that he was srewing. He doesn't have to prove himself.