HOW DO I ANSWER THIS QUESTION 'Please respond to the statement "truth has nothing to fear from investigation"
827275
I do believe truth has nothing to fear from investigation.\nI have a belief of my own, my faith.  where did it come from. \nWell it wasn't something my parents passed on to me because i left that belief system.. \nI searched for something for at least a good 10 years.\ni followed what was natural to me. what i felt worked when i tried it.\nafter so long trying things reading different peoples ideas i came up with my own views. \nThis sort of fits in with a belief system already out there. Also called Natures Religion. as its nature based. \nI believe i test my own thoughts and ideas.. (only to make sure I'm going going completely mad. most of the time.).\nWhere i see some follow there belief blindly not seeing reason or knowing what is good or bad. "its for the faith" or " its for god" .\nQuestioning brings our minds back from the clouds and hopefully gives us the grounding we need to answer them. \n\nJust my thoughts. \nBlessings ALD
82141
Passively. That is the only correct answer as the question is presented.
1144491
It is one thing to suspect something and another to prove it, I am sure if it was investigated it would be proved one way or the other. But it will never be investigated as those in power would not benefit from it. They may even be guilty of it.
161746
to answer all our ? truthfully
244463
Can you rephrase the question so it is understandable?
693274
HOW TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION?
602432
A very bold honest and straightforward letter.\nIt may not be possible to deny a word of it, hence USA will find it very difficult to respond.\nI liked it.
487512
How can I 'answer, with no question?'
701168
There is no such  thing as security.  Given that your decisions will not be based on fear.  to seek security is a fool's errand and will never lead to sound policy.
1124185
"Remember, it's not a lie if you BELIEVE it to be the truth..."\n\nGeorge Costanza
467802
He or she can probably get into more trouble by withholding evidence.  The words that come to mind are: accessory after the fact.  I believe that could apply here.
560144
Ask them about the red herrings in the story. All mysteries have red herrings.
1056041
Answers:\n\n1.  I do not fear you.\n2.  I do not fear you.
985241
The answer is:\n\ne) You have no supporting evidence for any of the above conclusions.
107545
You've not really asked a question, you are making a statement. Why the officer committed a crime is something only he can answer.
1162155
Be honest.  Say, "I don't know."\n\nIts an answer I wish Christianity wouldn't be afraid of.
443968
It depends!! A couple of questions need to be asked.\n\n(a) are the witness statements provided as evidence for the prosecution? If so they are subject to disclosure to the defence; or are they witness statements for the defence??;\n\n(b) has there been consent by the witness for release of the statement? (i.e. if it is my witness statement and I want to send it to the press, that is my right);\n\n(c)The other clarification that is required, it released to whom? Are we talking about public release without consent or release to the defence with a prohibition on public release?; and \n\n(d) what jurisdiction are you in?? (i.e. the laws of release change in difference countries, states, provinces, etc).