Can anyone think of ANY special interest groups who are not generally upset with the president?
830053
Well, there's Halliburton, big oil, weapon manufacturers, al Qaeda and the KKK.
779500
i wouldn't say there is one... but those who are more interested in what is best for themselves instead of what is in the best interest of those they represent would top the list.
91902
Find members of their party that are interested in truely serving America and have them internally censure them...works just as well and it doesn't embarass them or lead to more politicizing of what's going on...let the sharks take care of the sharks...they have bigger teeth...
1086460
I think if done professionally Republicans can raise good points. If you are looking for them on here, on either side, you will be sorely mistaken. People let their emotions control the real need for solution.
52379
I am not in love with my president. No hatred either.
145546
Yes, there are and, historically, there have been.  Ghandi is a good example as is Nelson Mandela.  While they weren't kings, they were important leaders.  Farther back, one can find monarchs who appear to have cared.  Sadly, we cannot really gauge that caring by our standards of behavior as time change.\n\nRight now, I would be hard pressed to find any leader who cares as much as they claim to.  Three examples of men who came into power on a foundation of caring about their country and people are obvious.  Hitler said he would free Germany of financial oppression and look what happened when he, instead, implemented his own plan of power.   Castro was able to gain power based on a promise of freeing Cuba of the influence of Batista and US corporations and politics.  He has since isolated Cuba in a way many find undesirable.  The third example is currently open to debate.  GW Bush claims to care about his country and people and, while we can say he is protecting the USA (ostensibly), he has eroded the individual freedoms which many claim a truly loyal-to-his-constituency would never do.
800286
that all the examples you gave are of those on the right shows me you aren't really interested in "coming together" but are trying to blast those on the right while ignoring cnn, abc, cbs, nbc, ed schultz, al franken, new york times, etc.  but the bottom line is no one would be profiting off of political divides if no one wanted to participate in such divides.  all the people and organizations you mentioned are just providing a service in response to public demand; that's why they are making money.
394325
You really need to sit down and think. Read the news from around the world. Pay attention to the critics and stop to analyze them. It's not as exciting as hunting, but it will help ALOT.\n\nIt's more than one, but our presidency and country needs more than one simple solution...
1151974
smart athiests... (ones that don't force their athiesm on others) might actually be BEST suited for president..\n\npersonally i am an athiest, but i wholeheartedly support whomever's religion if they feel that it answers their questions/gives them guidance.. and because athiests don't subscribe to any religion perhaps they can finally treat everyone in the US as equal... and not base policy on specific religios leanings...\n\nthat said, there are tons of folks who would never vote for an athiest... so there prob. already have been athiest presidents and there will be many more... they just won't talk about it...
763464
Special interest groups do not actually provide anything except a few votes for the politicians that support them.\n\nThis might sound harsh, but the best career politicians stay as far away from special interest groups as they can.\n\nIf there is a pro-life group for example, a very conservative republican might make an alliance with them to obtain their vote... but others who are pro-choice will abstain from voting for that politician so he might lose as much as he gained from the alliance unless he lives in an area with a heavy right-wing populus.\n\nThe same is true for democrats and liberal special interest groups. Some democrats will be reluctant to align themselves with a gay marriage proposal if they live in a conservative community.\n\nIn order for a politician to make strides  that count, they must maintain the illusion that they have YOUR best interest in mind... so they try to stay away from issues that fall 50/50.\n\nSometimes, they will "create" an issue that did not previously exist because they know that a strong majority would agree with them.... one of these issues is Child Protection. \nEverone loves the kids.... so it's a sure fire way to get a big vote because you would have to be a real jerk to support the opposite.
461317
it's not us per say. it's our president making the decisions that people have to follow. ask him.
83515
whatch out for trigger happy vice presidents\n(just kidding)\naccidental shooting of dogs and people second
389725
Yea, but they're mostly community groups and usually focus on the fight for equal rights.  I doubt you'll find very many popular ones online though since that seems to be the number one spot for guys to cruise.
18263
Certainly, think Operah would be a great choice. Lose the male ego & let some-one who can communicate with the masses have a go... Then again look what Thatcher did to Britain!
502684
Here are a few. By the way, did you notice how Little assistance the liberal ^^^^ above was. They don't have any information that actually supports how they feel.
8504
I'd like to see Bill Clinton get it. I think he's making a play for it. I think it would give more credence to the organization.
653962
I suspect that there are a lot of neocon zombie types out there that just follow the leader...like lemmings over the cliff.\nThey don't question anything that the President does or says.\nFor those that do have a working brain and actually use their civil rights to question the administration, these neocons only offer quick-draw comments such as "knee-jerk liberal", etc.\nWell, I'm here to tell you that as a life-long Republican, I did NOT vote for "W" (does the "W" stand for "wrong"?) in 2004...I did in 2K, but I learned from my mistake.\nAt least with the stickers on their cars, we can spot the lemmings.