is there a star HD835 or HD83536?
613898
Yes to both.  I do not, however, have any information on either.
131095
Enjoy:\n\nhttp://www.seeing-stars.com/Live/StarsAddresses_A.shtml
354510
By stars, you mean women, and by telescope, you mean co-ck right?\n\nAnd yes.
692194
Here are those nearer than 10 light years away:\n\nNote that several of these are double or triple stars in a star system\n\nName, Distance, Apparent Magnitude, Absolute Magnitude\nProxima Centauri V645 Cen 4.2 11.05 (var.) 15.5  \nRigil Kentaurus Alpha Cen A 4.3 -0.01 4.4 \n Alpha Cen B 4.3 1.33 5.7\nBarnard's Star  6.0 9.54 13.2 \nWolf 359 CN Leo 7.7 13.53 (var.) 16.7  \n BD +36 2147 8.2 7.50 10.5  \nLuyten 726-8A UV Cet A 8.4 12.52 (var.) 15.5  \nLuyten 726-8B UV Cet B 8.4 13.02 (var.) 16.0  \nSirius A Alpha CMa A 8.6 -1.46 1.4  \nSirius B Alpha CMa B 8.6 8.3 11.2
768736
180°\n\nYesterday it was asked about a 5-pointed star.\n\nWell let us look at an n-pointed star\n\n1. Draw the circumscribing circle\n\n2. Join the vertices and create a regular n sides polygon inside the circumscribing circle\n\n3. Join each vertex to the centre\n\n4. Each point of the star is half the ange at the centree subtended on the same side.\n\n5. Each angle in the centre is equal as they are all subtended by equal chords as the sides of a regular polygon are equal.\n\n6. The sum of the angles at the centre of the circle = 360°\n\n7 So the sum of the angles at the circumference \n= sum of the angles of the star \n= ½ of 360°\n= 180°\n\nBONUS\n8 So each angle = 180°/n\n\nIf n = 5 each angle = 36°\nIf n = 7 each angle = (25 5/7)°
329166
It depends on how massive the star is:\n\nFor stars of less than 8 times the mass of the sun:\nMain Sequence -> Red Giant -> (planetary nebula)-> White Dwarf\n\nFor stars with 8 to about 18 times the mass of the sun:\nMain Sequence -> Red Giant -> (supernova) -> Neutron Star\n\nFor stars with more than about 18 times the mass of the sun:\nMain Sequence -> Red Giant -> (supernova) -> Black Hole\n\nNote that for the massive stars I've simplified things into the "red giant" term, high mass star evolution is pretty complex, and many high mass stars can transition between red and blue supergiants several times during ther brief lives.
1088976
here you go:\n\nhttp://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/astronomy/stars/startypes.shtml\n\nFrom your list it would be nova, but that is for a (relatively) short period of time.
973173
There are more stars than we can count.  Most of them have planets.   Most of those planets have moons.
387987
http://www.star.le.ac.uk/~cgp/prof77.html
354564
yes there is. Solaris is the North Star.  As you may realise by the name if you can spot it it will point you towards the north direction so long as you are in the northern hemisphere.  It is the only star in the sky that does not appear to move as observed from planet earth.
77735
Some stars might have a solar system, but not all do.  Some stars are actually two "suns" orbiting around one another (called a binary star) but appearing to the unaided eye as a single star.  Some are even three stars together, such as alpha centauri, which is the closest "star" in the sky--though it is actually three stars that look like one.  Some are stellar clusters, where many of these "suns" are all bunched close enough to appear as one star.  Some are entire galaxies, with billions of stars, but so far away that they appear to be a single star from earth.  Some are stellar clusters, where many of these "suns" are all bunched close enough to appear as one star.\n\nSome things you might think are stars are actually planets.\n\nSome are dead "suns," where the fuel for the nuclear fusion that makes the sun burn has all been expended, leaving a big mass of iron, that glows white-hot for many years before turning dark.  If you look at these so-called "white dwarves" through a powerful telescope, you can see a faint ring of matter that has been blown away in the explosion that came when the star died.  Some stars are huge, and some are small.\n\nSome of the stars we have been able to see have solar systems of their own, which we detect by the slight wobble caused by the gravitational pull of the planet (or planets) as it orbits.
722718
August 23 - September 22  (Virgo)
373411
7.257276\n\nhttp://www.go.ednet.ns.ca/~larry/astro/HR_diag.html
892778
I think maybe the separation is smaller than the resolving power of my eyes rather than the angular separation of my eyes. So I can't resolve the two sources and just see one bright star. \n\nBest of luck - Mike
488135
A little over 4.35 light years.
246014
astronomy and astrology
236374
A very bright "star" that's usually reported is the planet Venus. It rises and sets close to the sun and has therefore in ancient times been given the names Eveningstar and Morningstar. \n\nIf you see a star that sets or rises just hours before or after the sun and is exceptionally bright, you're with highest probability looking at our neighbour planet Venus.