Thank you for Nuclear Proliferation?
603501
Your gesture is in-compete without cursing those who chose to use it to kill human beings, instead of serving the humanity by using it as a power source.
999127
God bless you too. I agree with you 100%. The problem is, it isnt going to happen. Then we would be as bad as them. Wholesale killing cant be the answer. We have to do it right, but I'll tell you what, the thought of a few B-52's tossing some tactical nukes  does make me smile.
776880
U.S. benefits? they only people you see concerned with this issue would be democrats like they are not corrupt........it is partisan politics as usual, the big picture is preventing nuclear proliferation , imagine if the Iranian dictator/mullah gets a hold of a nuke? want to live life according to them....no basic human rights, religious bigotry, anyone opposed to this war does not have a clue, the big picture is preventing chaos, genocide...helping the peaceful people in the region to have a better life and address our national security, the democrats have no plan for this war, it is a difficult problem that will persist for decades, if the terrorist use a nuke all other problems in this world will pale in comparison.In general I do agree with you and all you people who oppose this war I think your cowards, hey lets have a draft! or are you too busy enjoying yourself to fight for what is right? isolationism and pacifism have been historically shot down.Lets work towards eliminating all nuclear weapons internationally....keep our thumb on the Iranian government and take out the nuke facilities if necessary, if we do not they will most certainly use them on our good friends in Israel, have they not been crapped on enough? oh yeah viet vet I served fourteen years preserving our freedom and proudly display my commendation from Donald Rumsfield....a great man I would certainly like to volunteer but like you I am too old.
751023
Hooray for the nucleus!
314889
Israel attacked one of our warships, and we did nothing. What makes you think we care about nukes? Besides, they're a useful bogeyman to use in negotiation with the Mideastern leaders: "If you don't play nice, we might not be able to protect you from Israel." See how that works?
29846
i would deffinatly say yes it is for peace, since america and isreal HAVE LOTS of NUKES and nobody is saying anything ...:)
1046226
Absolutely.  I think we do the same exact thing Reagan did to Libya.  We send 1 ICBM with a conventional war head to the missile site and 49 others to the personal residences of the dictator in charge.  Usually that gets the point across....It did with Libya.
776559
That was awesome.  Thanks for sharing\nb
1000291
It's preemptive thanking ... kind of silly, isn't it?
617148
You just thanked them.\nKeep us posted, please.
481813
Why should the US be the only ones to have nukes in the first place?  Our president wants to claim everyine else is out to use them, when the fact of the matter is that our country is the only one in the world to have actually used them in a war situation.  In my eyes, I see our world as one.  And if one country on the map is allowed to have nukes to defend themselves, then so should everyone else.  We are just another country.  Just another land mass on the map.  Yes, we have more than others, but we also are more arrogant.  I can vouch for that, since I can be pretty stuck up at times.
95977
Don't know if I ever answered one of your questions, but in any case, I will say "You're welcome" for everyone.  Glad to be of help!
1043469
Not particularly, but thanks for asking.
641194
Hiroshima was nuked, you need to rephrase your question.
1030528
It's a good thing if we can monitor and help proliferate thier nuclear activities so they remain for energy only, not weapons.  Aiding Iran in this way could lead to future partnerships between our nations, and it sends a positive message to other countries about our ability to act diplomatically.\n\nIt's an important move symbolically, for our national security, and possibly a good business move.
1113941
I would continue the nuclear program.As long as it's OK for other countries to have nuclear energy(cos i don't think they are building weapons of mass destruction) it's OK for Iran to have it too
1115283
Yes, and thanks for your points.