has anyone seen the 911 Pentagon video footage released in the last 24 hours and what did u think?
594773
I have seen it several years ago. You can make a 7 foot hole with a 767 jumbo jet. One of the engines alone would make a larger hole that what the damage shows.
1163400
considering that one of the first things i saw on the page said, "Proof Blue Screen Technology Faked 2nd Plane "  i know its crap.\ni'm tired of writing about the 911 conspiracy stuff and these conspiracy ideas floating around right now are just getting more and more outrageous.  are there some questions that need to be answered about 911? yes probably are a few....but these questions have NOTHING to do with: now blue screened planes, planes swapped secretly for missiles and drones, faked plane crashes, secret voice sampled passengers to fake phone calls home, secret landing fields, breakaway light poles, hundreds to thousands of planted "witnesses" and fake work crews planting explosives.\nthis stuff is either some strange disinformation campaign, or someone trying to make a buck off people who don't trust the government and can't think.
396213
That video, as well as many other on that subject can be seen at my link. I tend to view these as propaganda. Of course, I view everything that comes out of the White House on this subject propaganda, too. There are facts that will never be known. There are too many discrepancies on both sides of the argument to make an informed decision one way or the other...
165393
Claim: First is that there was NO plane found at or near the pentagon. \n\nFact: A disintegrated American Airlines Boeing 757-223 (N644AA) was found on the lawn and inside of the Pentagon.\n\nClaim: a janitor in the first tower who heard an explosion in the basement minutes before the plane hit.\n\nFact: Thousands of other people heard and saw the explosion come from over their heads. Video images show Boeing 767’s hitting both of the towers.\n\nClaim: Also, research was done on the flights, and most cross country flights are booked to capacity but those 4 that day (towers, pentagon, flight 93) were all booked to LESS than half capacity, as if they knew what was going to happen.\n\nFact: Load factors for American and United Airlines had been very low on all flights. They were already hemorrhaging money and United eventually went into bankruptcy. American is still losing their shirt. This was competition in action…not predestination.\n\nClaim: The pilots apparently weren't good and I think he said 1 or 2 didn't even have the pilot’s license.\n\nFact: The pilots (I assume you mean the terrorist pilots) had enough training to steer an airliner into a building. You don’t need to be much beyond a private pilot with some internet information available to be able to fly an airliner in a reckless manner into a large target. But you probably couldn’t do it twice.\n\nClaim: The article alluded that the government had a lot to do with (or planned attacks)... ran out of characters :-(\n\nFact: The government’s too big to keep a secret this big. Too many people have big mouths…and coordinating a mass suicide would not be something many people would agree to get involved with.
797101
Well, the 911 hijackings and terrorists attacks have been declared actions by B.Laden and his supporters.\n\nWith that said, there has since come to light a lot of evidence to support that it was an inside job by 'unknown' government officials. Most suspect Cheney and Rumsfeld.\n\nThere has also been quite a bit of evidence questioning whether or not actual planes hit the Pentagon... but rather it was a bomb.\n\nEither way, at this point, it is pure speculation and I highly doubt we will ever know the truth within our lifetimes.
1086272
I believe you and I saw your google video.  Those buildings should have not come down that way.  Those buildings came down like a demolition crew was there.  It came down too straight.  That takes years of training. Where did that video go.  I was trying to send it to a few people and even my copy of the web address changed.  What's Up With THAT?
986450
No it is not crappy. It is pure hell.  \n\nThose troops in the vid are bloing off steam. If they didn't they\ncouldn't do the job.
758474
Any one who as seen the photos that were supplied to to the media  through various news outlets has to come to the sober conclusion that it was not a 737 airplane that hit the Pentagon.\n What is disturbing is why did they hold on to these videos for so long? Were their video experts "enhancing" it at the Pentagon all this time?
1007281
People are going to believe what they want to believe.  I saw a plane crash into a building.  Was it real or was it created by Hollywood.  The only people that really know are the one's that were there.  Al Qaida has taken resposibility for the 911 attacks. So? Who do you think did it?
1160864
lucky2bealive, I don't want to disagree with you but I don't believe you are going to find anywhere in the historical records that Bin Laden claimed responsibility for the 9/11 bombings. What he has done is praise the matyrs of that event. However, there would be more clarity and the issue can be put to bed finally if the government gave us the names of all the people that died in the various events. Where are the planes that crashed? Do you really believe that a building like the Pentagon would have cameras that are intermittent and take pictures every 7/8 seconds. Come.. Come. We are talking about the most technologically advanced country in the world. Something smells fishy and the stench cannot be dispersed until the Government come clean. Have you ever seen reports of the examination of  the so called crash sites?
1166933
This video is very compelling evidence that there's a lot more to the events of 9/11 than most people know.  A few of the things in the Loose Change video are inaccurate, but it compiles enough accurate information to lead to further questions.  \n\nTo the people who say things like "this has all been disproven" or "it's just conspiracy theories" you are fooling yourselves.  The famous philospher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) said “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident”.  People will believe any lie either because they want it to be true, or because they fear it is true.  The lie you are believing is that the official story of how the events of 9/11 occurred are true.  When you OBJECTIVELY analysis the scientific evidence -- as a detective or scientist would -- without injecting false patriatism into the equation -- you realize that it is simply physically impossible that things happened as we've been led to believe.\nAnd  as a side note, questioning the events of 9/11 is NOT unpatriotic.  On the contrary, it's about the most patriotic thing you can do.  We have a duty to defend this great nation of ours against ALL threats, foriegn AND DOMESTIC.  And the families of the victims of 9/11 have a right to know the TRUTH of how and why their loved ones died.  In that spirit, I present the following very small bits of information concerning the events of 9/11.\n\nYou can’t collapse a skyscraper with jet fuel.\nMany engineers have come forward and said that there’s no way those buildings fell from fire.  Steel doesn’t weaken until almost 2000 degrees F, and it doesn’t melt until almost 3000 degrees F.  Jet fuel doesn’t burn hot enough to do it.\nThe official NIST report states “The initial jet fuel fires themselves lasted at most a few minutes” and office material fires would burn out within about 20 minutes in a given location. (NIST, 2005; p. 179, emphasis added.)   The final NIST report on the Towers admits:  \n"Of the more than 170 areas examined on 16 perimeter column panels, only three columns had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250ºC… Only two core column specimens had sufficient paint remaining to make such an analysis, and their temperatures did not reach 250 ºC. ... Using metallographic analysis, NIST determined that there was no evidence that any of the samples had reached temperatures above 600 ºC."  (NIST, 2005, pp. 176-177) \nKevin Ryan, the engineer from the company that underwrote the towers, said it was impossible that a jet fuel fire brought the towers down.  The architect who designed the twin towers has repeatedly said that he designed them to take not 1, but 2, massive passenger airliner impacts and not fall.  \nPools of molten steel were found in the basements of the towers (including tower 7) weeks after 9/11.  Steel melts at 2777 degrees F.  Jet fuel burns at only 1577 degrees F.  It is literally impossible for jet fuel fires to get hot enough to melt steel into molten pools.  Something else must have done it.\n\nFirefighters and survivors said repeatedly that bombs were going off throughout the towers, on many different floors. Firefighters gave very specific descriptions of seeing flashes of light and explosions going off on the lower levels.   If you watch the news from that morning, you'll even see Fox news reporting a "4th explosion" going off in tower 1.   For instance, at the start of the collapse of the South Tower a Fox  News anchor reported:   “There is an explosion at the base of the building… white smoke from the bottom… something happened at the base of the building!  Then another explosion.”\nFirefighter Edward Cachia independently reported:  \n“[We] thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came
576804
it's working now.  but all you see is a single frame of something white entering the screen from the right.  the next frame is of an explosion, with no sign of the tail or anything.\n\nthe second link you posted is much more informative about the pentagon attack.
627907
I'm very weary of the conspiracy theories. As one of the people who watched the plane go into the Pentagon (literally watched it hit), it makes me very annoyed to see how many people think so many other people could be wrong, imaging things, or a part of a conspiracy. Maybe the theory would be credible if no one was around to watch.  But between NYC and DC/Arlington, both in the tail end of rush hour commuter traffic, you'd have to get about 50,000 people to agree to this conspiracy. I find it insulting and I am immediately annoyed by anyone who actually thinks these web sites are reporting the truth.
538522
I SAW the plane go in that day. I was less than a quarter mile away and I watched it happen. I can assure you, it was a commercial airliner.  We were in an office building in Crystal City, just across the highway and we were watching the CNN coverage of the WTC on the Internet so when we heard the plane coming in (you get used to what planes should and should not be doing there, so close to National Airport) we all watched. We could see bits of clothes and things from people's luggage falling from the sky after the explosion.  This was no missile or bomb. It was a regular ol' commercial airliner.\n\nYou can't see the debris because it's too far inside. The Pentagon is not a single building--- it is a series of pentagon-shaped buildings, each one a little larger than the last, and built around each other. These are pretty big buildings and there's a good amount of space in between.  It's a long way from the innermost part of the inner ring to the outermost part of the outer ring. And when the plane hit, it went all the way through the first two rings and most of the way through the third.\n\nSo the reason you can't see the debris is because the hole the plane made is deeper than the length of the plane. If you imagine parking your car allll the way inside your garage, as close to the wall as you can get, then standing off to the side a bit. You can't see your car any more. Your car did not disappear--- it just is in a place where it can't be seen from where you are standing.\n\nSo don't believe everything you see on the Internet. Any whack-job with a video camera and Photoshop can build a conspiracy theory web site.
611622
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=loose+change\n\nWatch that video. It will answer all your 9/11 related questions. It is an hour and twenty minutes long but it is a good film.
908696
i will watch it but you got to learn how to put a link on here for next time,highlight the address bar of the page you want to link to,right click go to copy,then go to where you want to put the link ,right click and click on paste alot more people will go to your sites if you do that.\n\nnot looking good is it .yet also the average fella cant seem to understand our western governments are controlled by world banks and so is the media . we are heading for a world wide version of nazi germany that is more of a threat to humanity now than global warming .\n\nupdate :itell you what changed in the U.S with KATRINA more people woke up to what is going on.fema wouldnt let the people out of certain buildings they were kept in for safety !!!! lorry loads of bottled water turn up FEMA turn it away ,a tanker of gas turns up everyone goes to get gas FEMA turned it away .the sheriff caught members of FEMA cutting down emergency comunication power lines ,the sheriff put the line back up and hadto put armed police along it to stop them from doing this .FEMA ?Federal Emergency Management agency !!! they go in make the situation worse then congress or whoever has the power to do so gives them more funding and more power as an agency .its literally getting down to twilight stuff here guys watch this link ,try and watch it all the way through, theres a mayor in new orleans at the end on mainstream news programme that actually tells the truth .would you beleive it!!!!\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7354448366688445862&q=police+state
994903
They should release all 84 confiscated videos as well as rescind all 2500 or so gag orders that have been placed on witnesses, either through direct threat or as part of their victim compensation packages.\n\nWhy can't some witnesses talk about what they saw and others can?  Why can't they just show one of the 84 videos where an actual plane hits the Pentagon to shut up the conspiracy folks?