Whats the difference between wi-max and Motorola's canopy technology?
601993
Dear Cln2n,\nYour pertinent question and urgent curiosity has unfortunately, been buried under more legitimate concerns. If you don't get an answer within 24 hours, it is best to delete your query and ask again.\nCln2n, I would like to take this opportunity to express my personal opinion. You have been foolish, Cln2n. Very, very foolish. Anyone can see that the purpose of Yahoo! Answers is to serve as a modern chatroom. More and more, Java programming is becoming less and less supported, there is no other method of bringing people together in a social environment than to create PHP scripts where the "thinking" can be done on the server rather than on your machine. With that in mind, Cln2n, you should interrogate the shallow-minded participants of Yahoo! Answers with matters that appeal to their common denominator. Questions such as, "How long is the normal tally whacker?" or, "My boyfriend says I should dump my hubby, what you think?"..., would get you a substantial number of replies.\n\nGive up your pursuit of truth and petty wonders, Cln2n. Quit asking bland, colorless questions. Are you naive? No person who is capable of giving you the answer you hoped for can last while reading though a heap of puddings, pies and pastry. I'm only doing you a favor, Cln2n, by giving you a proper admonishment you can now begin to formulate an apology. When you are ready, send your atonement to http://surveys.yahoo.com/user_ad_feedback\n\nAnd Cln2n, if you insist upon asking serious questions, remember that a few good jolts from a peace officer's tazor should bring you around to your senses. Please, check your spelling and throw some slang into the mix so you don't offend any of the egos lurking, waiting to pounce on you with crass, thoughtless one-liners.\n\nThank you Cln2n, and have a great day! -Zack
1111424
I bought "Mobile Phone Tools" by Motorola off of eBay.\n\nI have transferred my phone book from a V400 to my V3 Razr, added pictures for wallpaper etc.\n\nThere is no version number on the software but it says Copyright Motorola, INC 2004.\n\nIt works good.
114702
Your question is not clear.  Since it is in "networking", it is presumably about antennas for 802.11 wireless or bluetooth, which operates in the same band.\n\nFirst source:  effects of antenna, multipath, etc.\n\n"An antenna simply integrates (or adds up) the various signals directed towards it, with a weighting factor as a function of both propagation and polarization directions.\nDirectionality can change magnitude of multipath effect seen by radio by minimizing contribution of other paths, but does not change radio’s innate ability to handle a given multipath effect.\nDoes interact with circuitry and nearfield environment, changing performance (see 11-04-0675)"\n\nSecond source:\n\n"New world record for unamplified wireless networking!! \n125 miles!"
765837
I've had experience with all three of these, I prefer the wireless form Verizon.  Even when your signals quite weak it's speed is very good.  Something you might wanna look into, if you already have a cell phone, Look in your phone's menu and see if it offers a DUN setting, if this setting appears in your menu all you'll need is a USB cord and the drivers for your phone, and you can use it as a wireless modem.  This will save the expense of having to add another subscription account to your cell service.  All you will need to do is modify your contract, for unlimited Internet access.  This will usually only at about $25 a month to your total bill.  Where as if you purchase a contract for an air card this usually adds $75-$80 a month your cell phone bill.  I hope this helps good luck!
91915
By using Google.\n\nhttp://www.google.com\n\nSearch for WiMax and also 802.11.N
1136732
Ad-Hoc Mode is a way for wireless devices to communicate directly with each other without using an access point.\n\nInfrastructure Mode is a way wireless devices communicate with each other through an access point.
432898
Core duo has two processing cores which makes it faster - can handle more instructions. Centrino being older is slower and was kind of a bundle deal where if it said centrino it had to have wireless access (not the cpu - the computer)
195047
WiMax stands for Wireless over Microwave access. It is a new standard that is coming up as an extension to broadband technologies such as DSL and Cable, especially where these services are not available. The underlying technology is still Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM).\n\nFor more info: http://www.tutorial-reports.com/networking/broadband\n\nhttp://www.wimaxforum.org
292619
Security! \n\nSecurity should be a big part of any presentation concerning wireless connectivity.\n\nAdditionaly you could discuss its uses (RFID, networking, etc...)\nCost\nInfrastructure comparison to wired connectivity\nAccess
533674
WiFi is a LAN protocol (that is, it doesn't involve routing) so anything involved with WiFi, such as SSIDs, has to be either Layer 1 (physical) or Layer 2 (data link).  And SSIDs don't have anything to do with the physical aspects of transmitting and receiving radio signals, so I'd say that mismatched SSIDs are a Level 2 problem.
240883
Both 802.11B and 802.11G operate in the 2.4GHz range.  This is an unregulated band and is heavily occupied by many devices including other WLANs and wireless telephones in your neighborhood.  Both 802.11B and B have support for multiple channels, if you haven't already, try using different channels.
448995
What cell carrier?  I have motorola (nextel) and I can't lock my own browser.
472387
Well if your phone wireless freq. is 2.4Ghz it's going to basically fight over the air space. Most wireless signals run on 2.4ghz. Only one that doesn't is an 'A' network.  So the best solution for you IMO is to just get a new Core-less phone that runs on the 5.8ghz freq. You win because the 5.8 phones are the best ones, and they are not to expense.... As you getting a router on the freq.
191965
Biggest difference is price and available speed packages.\n\nCable usually allows larger bandwidth at much higher prices.\nDSL allows reasonably large bandwidth for normal useage at reasonable prices.
638090
Tutorial...\n\nhttp://www.turnpoint.net/wireless/cantennahowto.html
193613
amen to the girl above me!\n(i currently use Cingular, and its awesome)
1081811
Comparing WiMax to WiFi is akin to comparing apples to oranges. Initially it’s easy to see why the comparison would exist, as most people think WiMax is merely a more robust version of WiFi. Indeed they are both wireless broadband technologies, but they differ in the technical execution and ultimately their business case is very different. In addition to the technical differences that exist, the marketplace difference is that equipment is more or less non-existent for WiMax and certainly not geared towards a residential environment with very high pricing to be expected. It will take at least 2 years to see equipment of mass market uptake pricing. \n\nWiMax will not be commercially available until the second half of 2005, and even then at a very controlled level. This is primarily due to standardization issues. In fact, it won’t be until 2006 that a robust production and implementation will happen due to the ramp-up period for manufacturers. This is certainly one challenge to the widespread adoption of WiMax. Additionally, WiMax will have issues of pricing, and will remain far more expensive than WiFi. WiMax will be primarily adopted by businesses to replace or displace DSL, and offices that want to cover a lot of territory without entering the world of endless repeaters that are necessary with the 802.11 technologies. It will take some time (2 years) for WiMax to significantly reduce its price-point for residential uptake.  WiMax will not displace WiFi in the home because WiFi is advancing in terms of speed and technology. Each year brings a new variant to the 802.11 area with various improvements. \n\nAdditionally, for commercial deployment, frequency allocation will be an issue. With the three dominant communications players controlling the best frequencies, it will be hard to get the type of traction needed with the remaining companies operating in the frequencies available. WiMax will become extremely robust and displace WiFi as the deployment of choice for commercial deployments, but that won’t even begin until the end of 2006. Based upon the number of public hotspots already deployed, WiMax will not be chosen to replace those as they are up and running adequately and personnel involved understand how to work with the technology. The business case does not exist at the hotspot level. Where it may exist is for wider free use deployments such as city deployments (free ones) and other government sponsored or carrier sponsored (with ultra inexpensive pricing for consumers) deployments. If this happens then its not only WiFi that will be displaced, but cable and DSL will also lose a percentage of their subscriber base. What will cause the displacement is the consumer’s proven desire for a bundled package.