Would a life size image of a Ruler be acurate on my Computer screen?
604837
Not really.  It depends on the size of your monitor and the resolution that you set it up.  There might be some site that has all possible combinations, but that's kind of rare.  You could approximate it if you knew your dimensions.
889529
just change the image size I think if you do percentage rather than pixels its easier to work on the scale, if your not happy with the size just do a ctrl Z to go back tot he original size or add me on msn  aidan_hart@hotmail.com n I can talk ya through it, as I dont have a version open in front of me now, and dont fully understand your question
566833
right click on desktop > go to properties > click settings > slide resolution bar and experiment until u get the desired resolution.
544470
Open it in Windows Photo Editor.  Use IMAGE / RESIZE.\n\nYou could also do this in a myriad of programs such as Powerpoint, etc.
107209
If you want to do that by hand use free trasform (ctrl+t). You can also use Image->Image Size to scale the Image and Image->rotate .. iguess it's obvious :D
919487
I think the general idea is to report as much information as possible from each measuring device. Otherwise you are just throwing away information. So for the ones that read out some digital display, you would simply report all the digits that it reads out. The other ones, where you have some choice in the matter, you would read to the nearest marking, plus estimate one more digit. \n\nAs an example, take the ruler marked with 1 mm markings:\n\ncase A. Widget length lines up exactly 10 mm \ncase B. Widget length is halfway between the 10 mm mark and the 11 mm mark. \n\nYou could actually measure a difference between A and B, so the number you report should reflect that difference. So case A would be reported as 10.0 mm, where as B would be reported as 10.5 mm. If you report both as just 10 mm (because that is how the ruler is marked) you would be missing the fact that you can measure a difference between the two. But generally, you can't estimate anymore that one place past how the ruler is marked, so you wouldn't try to report 10.55 mm, for example.
180246
Yes. There will be a small quality degradation, but you probably won't notice it. You'll notice these kinds of things if you copy a copy several times.
492364
Look in Edit preferences, Expressions.  Click browse your PC and find what u want.  I think it has to be like 48x48 pixels.  Mine is my cat's face.
160292
Yes you can... sometimes it isn't totally accurate but sometimes it is VERY acurate - like 99% acuracy.  I tested mine and it said my town correctly.  \n\nHere are a few sites that have the search feature that are available to anyone who wants to use it.  It can be used for good things but it can be used by idiots who are trying to find ways to hurt others.
201111
You need to measure the distance between the closely spaced lines (J values).  Trans and cis J values will be different
158033
Excel will do this.\n\nIf you don't have software try a search for\n\n"free online graphing tool"\n\n"free online graphing application"  or ...."software"\n\nThere are lots of free online computation modules for doing all kinds of weird things, even in the thousands.\n\nSo there must be what you want somewhere too.\n\nIf the result does not download you can use the Print Screen button up at the top of your keyboard, I think this copies it to scratch and you can paste the result into PaintBrush and remove the parts you don't want.  The saved image can be imported into MWord.\n\nI have done lots of this stuff and almost always found a way, even when something somewhere was not working right, when you are working hard for your salary you have to get things done with quality in whatever way is possible, even with impediments.
74995
In MSPaint,Go to View->Zoom->Large Size. It will serve your purpose
843413
depends on the quality of the photo file ie x by y pixels.
1043348
It's almost impossible to discuss graphics software without first establishing an understanding of the differences between the two major 2D graphic types: bitmap and vector images. This is an important lesson and often a tough one to grasp. If you work with graphics at all, it's bound to come up, so it's an important concept to understand. Let's start by talking about the more common type: bitmap images. \nFacts About Bitmap Images\nBitmap images (also known as raster images) are made up of pixels in a grid. Pixels are picture elements; tiny dots of individual color that make up what you see on your screen. \n\n\nFacts About Bitmap Images\nBitmap images (also known as raster images) are made up of pixels in a grid. Pixels are picture elements; tiny dots of individual color that make up what you see on your screen. \n\n\nAll these tiny dots of color come together to form the images you see. The typical computer monitor has 72 or 96 pixels per inch, depending on your monitor and screen settings. \nTo illustrate this, let's take a look at a typical desktop icon such as the one shown in the image here. The icons on your desktop are typically 32 by 32 pixels. In other words, there are 32 dots of color going in each direction. When combined, these tiny dots form an image. The icon shown in the upper right corner of this example is a typical desktop icon at screen resolution. As you can see, when you enlarge the icon, as I have in this example, you can clearly see each individual square dot of color. Note the that white areas of the background are still individual pixels, even though they appear to be one solid color. \n\nBitmap images are resolution dependent. Resolution refers to the number of pixels in an image and is usually stated as dpi (dots per inch) or ppi (pixels per inch). Bitmap images are displayed on your computer screen at screen resolution: 72 or 96 ppi. However, when printing bitmaps, your printer needs much more image data than a monitor. In order to render a bitmap image accurately, the typical desktop printer needs 150-300 ppi. If you've ever wondered why your 300 dpi scanned image appears so much larger on your monitor, this is why. For more in-depth information about resolution, scanning, and printing bitmap images, refer to my article Getting Started Scanning. \n\nBecause bitmaps are resolution dependent, it's difficult to increase or decrease their size without sacrificing a degree of image quality. When you reduce the size of a bitmap image through your software's resample or resize command, you must throw away pixels. When you increase the size of a bitmap image through your software's resample or resize command, the software has to create new pixels. When creating pixels, the software must estimate the color values of the new pixels based on the surrounding pixels. This process is called interpolation. \n\nDid you notice in the paragraph above, I specifically talked about resizing images "through your software's resample or resize command"? I want to make the distinction between this method of resizing versus zooming in and out, or dragging the edges of your images in a page layout program to resize it. This type of resizing is more accurately called scaling. Scaling an image does not effect the image permanently. In other words, it does not change the number of pixels in the image. However, if you scale a bitmap image to a larger size in your page layout software, you are going to see a definite jagged appearance. Even if you don't see it on your screen, it will be very apparent in the printed image. Scaling a bitmap image to a smaller size doesn't have any effect; in fact, when you do this you are effectively increasing the ppi of the image so that it will print clearer. \n\nCommon bitmap formats include: \n• BMP \n• GIF \n• JPEG, JPG \n• PNG \n• PICT (Macintosh) \n• PCX \n• TIFF \n• PSD (Adobe Photoshop) \n\nPopular bitmap editing
643717
make the picture larger or equal to the res'.
898742
It depends how many you put there.... You could for instance have an 8-bit grayscale JPEG, or a 24-bit full-colour JPEG. The bit depth isn't fixed.\n\nRawlyn.
542597
It is possible. However, you need to establish from the picture (I assume by picture you mean photo or a realistically painted picture) something of known length. \n\nFor example, if in the picture you can find a piece of paper money, and that you can compare the size to a same piece of paper money, then you can determine the scale of picture to real life. \n\nAlso, you have to make sure the object of interest in the picture is more or less at the same distance from the camera as the reference object.