what do you think about bush trying to stop iran from having nukes?
604437
yes. he is doing a great job. all the people who think he is doing a bad job are idiots. all the stupid people seem to not understand. if they want iran to have nukes then they are anti america.
661098
Should the U.S be stopped from having nukes?
231561
I think we should round all liberals and ship them off to Iran.  Maybe they could persuade the islamofacist regime over there to give up their desires for nuclear weapons and to destroy Israel off the face of the earth by sitting under palm trees and singing kumbaya with the mullas until the camels come home. Maybe we will get lucky and have the Isrealies take care of the radical iranians & liberals at the same time with their nukes.  Is it just me or has every nation near Isreal threatened Isreal with destruction?  Would some one please tell me when Isreal has unjustly attacked their nation neighbor?  The absolute ignorance and attitude towards one of the strongest, most stable, techonolgically advanced country in the Middle East is just stunning.  What in the hell has Iran, Sryia, Jordan, or Lebannon provided to advance mankind?  Have any ot these countires provided any means, methods, or technologies for Humans?  Oil is the only thing I can think of and the USA had to go to them to help find, extract & refine oil.  Iran is sitting on top of the 2nd or 3rd largest supply of oil and they need nuclear power?  Use up all the oil and them you will have a major concern.\n\nI know what some of you are thinking.  What about the USA, India, and Pakistan, they have nukes!  No sh*t sherlock.  All countires with nukes has openly stated they have them & that the IAEA can freely inspect their nukes.  Iran on the other hand, has not announced their intentions and will not let the IAEA inspect.  Why even North Korea has let the IAEA inspect nukes.
553738
No.  As much as I don't care for President Bush, he has:\n\n* Never called for the annihilation of another sovreign state. (Israel)\n* Never made threats to nuke another sovreign state (US)\n* Never allowed extremism to dictate his country's politics\n\nI think the sooner the president of Iran can be replaced, the better the world will be.
442167
He is the president of Iran, and I fear that only he knows what he is looking for.  It seems he wants Iran to have nuclear weapons.
246540
Iran's president has made it no secret that Iran is developing WMDs.  He also has said that they plan to blow Isreal off of the map and then come after the U.S.  Iran is a threat to our national security.\n\nAs for Isreal, they are the only free nation in the middle east and are a close ally of the United States.  I have no problem with them having WMD's because none of them are going to end up in my backyard.
472119
The media is really hyperinflating this.   The use of a strategical nuclear bomb must come from Congress.   The President may authorize the use of a single tactical nuke.   Doing that without Congressional approval would be political suicide for everyone under G.W. Bush though.   Bush doesn't have anything to lose by using this strategy, but he will utilize every other option he has before going that route. \n\nI would think that if Iran does not comply soon (and the clock is ticking my friend), covert actions will be taken if possible.   If they aren't an option, then it is likely that you will see the use of the B1 bombers and Tomahawk missles.  Perhaps some F-111 or other precision bombers too.   \n\nIran isn't stupid either.  They have their labs in fortified areas....surrounded by civilian populations, so when they are bombed, they can cry to the bleeding heart liberals that we bombed the women and children.   \n\nDon't look for nukes from the US to be hitting Iran soon.  Let's just make sure nukes from Iran aren't hitting the US anytime sooner either.
387302
i do not feel that Iran are looking for allies, their president is getting his people behind him by playing games with america (and the rest of the world) to enhance his hatred for the west. He is a very clever man.
335511
I think that we will eventually get into a war with them, if some bleeding heart liberal gets elected, I don't think we will do anything to stop them.  \n\nHeres what I want to happen, We need to either set up a military overthrow, and set up a true democracy there, or we need to go in there, and systematically destroy every facility that is even remotely assosciated with neuclear anything, and then assasinate a bunch of people in the government.\nHopefully, this is what bush will do, 1. Kill welfare, 2. with all that money, fund a full scale invasion of Iran.  3. If neccesary, draft...
347515
Now that is one big question lol. I would say this to you, what do you want from iran?\nOk so Iran gets nukes so what?\nSo they give them to some bad guys so what?\nSo bad guys give them to us like say 3 of our biggest cities. May four cities. Now what do we need to do to Iran?\nHow many got to die before we make a decision?\nIt is coming and soon!!!!!!!!!!
586798
Iran's president IS nuts, basically. He's spouting nonsense for internal consumption and hasn't completely understood yet that the international media picks it up and runs with it. Iran may or may not really be nuclear capable, but the ayatollahs who really run the country want their populace to think so. In any case, don't bomb them...yet.
432793
Essentially he wants as few countries to have nuclear weapons as possible, which he has in common with many other people on the planet. The more countries there are with Nukes, the more chance there is of one nation using them against another nation and therefore the more chance there is of global nuclear war, which no-one wants.\n\nHe's being very loud about Iran (and North Korea) because they are "Unfriendly" states, i.e. They don't like America, nor in fact any of the Western Countries. But it's not as if it's just him, many European nations are lobbying very hard to stop those 2 nations getting nuclear weapons as well. Essentially the main worry is that Iran's connections to extremist Muslim paramilitary groups (or Terrorists if you prefer) will cause them to start supplying nuclear weapons to them, which they'll use against targets in the West. There's also the whole Israel problem, the president of Iran has been very clear in his opinions of Israel (he despises them and wants to destroy them), if he gets his hands on Nukes and uses them on Israel, then the whole world could go down the toilet.\n\nThe reason he's not going on about India (or Pakistan) is because they already HAVE nuclear weapons, so there's not much point trying to take them away now.
706670
They need something over there to be bombed.  I think a few cruise missiles are in order simply to wake up ahmadinejad and scare the sheet out of him.  There must be some actions and repercussions for what they are doing.  If there aren't, why would they ever stop?  It needs to be done now BEFORE they have a nuclear arsenal.  Same goes for north korea.
864501
Let's all pray he doesn't start another war somewhere to take people's minds off his goofups!\nHe seems to have his eyes on Iran. God help us!
106532
One thing's for sure, US won't go for another war, it already has too many on its hands.\nAfter being referred to UN Security Council, pressure will be placed on Iran. \nWith no country coming to its rescue at this point, let's see whether Iran buckles under the pressure or not.\nMost probably, it won't. Because developing a nuclear capability is more of a pride for each nation, even if its only a deterrant.\nBut, only time will tell!
883767
lol, the Shah of Iran was instilled in the 50's, before Iran got nuclear technology.  In the 70's he was forcibly removed.\n\nOUr governments secrets continue to be declassified, albeit 40 years too late, but it is good to know what lengths those in power will use to stay in power.\n\nI am aghast at the idea of sharing nuclear technology with India, who refuses to sign the Non-proliferation treaty, yet already has 150 nukes?  Plus their continual pissing match against Pakistan is a little concerning as well...but we collectively put Bush in charge....and are now paying the price.  Iran signed the NPt...which basically is an agreement to NOT BLOW UP THE WORLD.  As the country with the Most Nukes, if anyone attacks with nukes, we can and will effectively destroy the world.  Kind of cry babyish, I know:  play by our rules, or we'll blow up the whole friggin world.....luckily, even our idiot leaders see no point in ruling a radioactive wasteland....at least for now.
831598
I heard about missile test, maybe they are able to carry nuclear war heads, but there is no evidence whatsoever that Iran is making Nuclear weapons, or even intends to.\nBut that will be the excuse when George Dubya attacks Iran before the end of his term in office. Of course this is a very bad idea, but the wheels are already in motion, and only mass protest in the USA can stop it. The Mid-term elections can't stop it, most democrats will go along with a new war that will have severe consequences for the entire world.\n\nIt is not good news for Dubya at this point in time that the media reports Iranian missile tests, because it show the consequences of his foreign policy, Iraq and Afghanistan Invaded, North Korea safe from invasion. In short the whole world can see that if you don't want to be invaded by the USA, get your hands on some nukes as quickly as possible.\nhttp://www.portalino.it/nuke/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=18792