How can the word "one" be a "compound unity". Isn't one a numerical value?
609891
The difference between Yachid (singularity) and Echad (compound unity) has been discussed here before.\n\nLook at Numbers 13:23 where the spies carried grapes back that were so big they had to use a pole to carry them.  The word is Echad. But it wasn't "one grape" that was being carried, it was one cluster.\n\nSimilarly in Genesis 2:24 man and woman become Echad flesh "one flesh". Are man and wife more than one?
770970
By saying the trinity, you are saying,"There are 3 distinct persons united in one God." They are not just names of the same God.They can co-exist at the same time and yet they are one. Taking this definition, It is actually not a mystery. The key to unsolving this mystery is understanding "one". The one is not the numerical number one. Below are the 2 definitions of one.\n\nA) Yachead – Absolute unity; the numerical number one\n– Abraham offered up his only (Yachead) son (Genesis 22:2,12)\n– They shall mourn for him, as one mourns for his only (Yachead) son (Zechariah 12:10)\n\nB) Echad – A collective unity; more than one person, one crowd, one nation etc.\n–People gathered together as one (Echad) (Ezra 3:1)\n–The Lord or God is one (Echad) God (Deuteronomy 6:4)\n–In that day, there shall be one (Echad) Lord and His Name one (Echad) (Zechariah 14:9)\n\nFor example there is one nation, but in it there is many distinct different persons. So likewise God is one(echad) God.\n\nExample 2: There is one Sun to rule the earth,The sun manifests in threefold power,Light, fire and heat. They can co_exist at the same time. \n\nNow for the sake of study, Christians have seperated the father, the son and the holy spirit, to be able to learn about each individual in a more comprehensive manner.\n\nBut the truth is they are always together and they are inseperable.\n\nso all these to say that \na) God is one in operation but 3 in revelation\nb) The three are distinguishable but indivisible\n\nHope this helps
1130664
1+1 = 10 if you are counting in binary.\n\n1+1=0 with 1 carry over if you are counting in urinary.\n\nanything bigger than binary = 2.\n\n1+1 = 1 if you are talking logical (OR) also.\n\n1+1 = 2 at first then it becomes 3 then 2 again if you are talking about marriage and divorce.
668533
There are 3 pairs:\n\n1. 0 and 0\n2. 2 and 2\n3. 9 and 9\n\nThere won't be any more as the number values get larger. This is because when the no.s are multiplied, there would be more digits than when the no.s are added. So they can't be opposite if they have diff. no. of digits.
1008854
Dont be fooled by the guy that might answer "Infinity plus one."  You know the problem with that.  How about "Infinity times infinity."
3940
1. It's one multiplied by ten to the twenty-third power.\n  -Otherwise ten to the twenty-third power.\n\n2. It is also an example of multiplicative identity.\n\nSorry if that is not what you are looking for.
990578
Our society uses base 10; thus, 1 + 1 = 2.  Try converting your 1 + 1 mathematical sentence to another base and see if you can find one that will equal 3~here are the directions to convert bases~\nhttp://www.britannica.com/eb/article-205799
1060197
Grappling with the axiomatic logic is not suitable for most of\nus and these readings are difficult.  Let me attempt an inadequate simplifi-\ncation.  I would say a number "belongs to a concept" and is an\nextension of that concept and then statements about numbers correspond to\n"identities of concept".\n\nIn the sense of counting, one apple and one orange represent identical\nconcepts even if apples are not oranges, so we write 1 = 1.  Now 1 + 1 or\nfor that matter 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 (repeating)  are represented in the\nsense of identity by other symbols which, if arabic numerals are used, we\nwrite as 2 or 5.  The symbols are just compact notation for representation\nof an identical "concept".  I would say that number is not anything\nphysical nor is it subjective.  This may not be very satisfying but deep\nphilosophical questions about numbers may always remain unanswered in very\nsatisfying ways.
44177
I'm sorry, but I don't think that you have actually asked a question here, or perhaps you have left off some very pertinent information. Unless you just wanted the above statement to be explained.\n\nIn this instance, the universe of discourse just means all the points contained in the set S = (p(x,y)), which is all the possible combinations of x = 1,2,3 and y = 1,2,3. For example, (1,3) and (2,2) and (3,1) would all be points contained in the universe of discourse for p(x,y).
484413
There is no such thing. You may be referring to Chapter 11, perhaps you confused it with a roman numeral 2
493159
It does not have a real number value and is therefore defined as "i". i is an 'imaginary number'. The concept is a little too involved for me to be able to supply a complete answer describing imaginay numbers though. Hope that helps.
110409
'Software', like other nouns such as 'water' is a continuous, rather than discrete, noun. It therefore doesn't take a plural.
580979
one number and one letter.
254599
Yes it is a function because the two variables have a 'one-to-one' relationship, which means that for  every value of x, you can get one and only one value of 'y'. If this one-to-one relationship exists then its called a function.\n  Ex.\n   If x=1, y=3\n   If x=23, y=47 etc.
2756
A to the power of n is:\n\nA * A * A ... n times.\n\nor\n\n1 * A * A * A ... n times.\n\nsince n is 0, w're left with\n1.\n\n--\n\nbut really it's defined to be 1.
890832
Gary, that's a good one, but one mistake...\nyou said that a=b, thus you cannot divide by (a-b) b/c that equals zero, and you cant divide by zero.
342027
hahahah that doesn't make sense in order for two sides of an equation to be equal the numerical value of each side must be the same.  Whats with all the equals signs!