What is the principle of mixed government?
602967
A pragmatic one. That two types of government are able to combine forces and able to co-join two methods of government to solve the same problem from two perspectives.
839702
Federalism is a system of government in which sovereignty is constitutionally divided between a central governing authority and constituent political units (like states or provinces), creating what is often called a federation. Proponents are often called federalists. In Canada, federalism means opposition to sovereigntist movements (usually that of Quebec). In Europe, "federalist" is often used to describe those who favor a stronger federal government (or European Union government) and weaker provincial governments. The same is historically true in the United States, with those who generally favor a confederation, or weaker federal government and stronger state governments, being called "anti-federalists". However, in recent years in America "federalism" has come to be associated with opposition to a stronger federal government.
163014
Ahh, the Connecticut Compromise.  Small states wanted each state to be equal.  Large states, obviously didn't like that idea.  They felt that since they had more people, they should have a larger share of representation in government.  The Connecticut Compromise brought the two sides together with the Bicameral legislator - House (based on population of the state) and Senate (making all states equal).
976633
No no no no no! Every country should be it's own, and be seperate. Countries shouldn't be mixed together. If they are, people lose their convictions that set them apart in the first place. (i.e. "nutrality". btw, nutrality is the first step towards humanism and a Godless nation)\nIf cultures are swirled together, it  leaves a mellow, confused country that is fighting itself because of citizen unrest.
649083
Yes, but it might depend on type of government
951131
In a nutshell, Federalism is the seperation of powers between a Federal, national government and a local government, as we have in the U.S., or it can be defined as the decentralization of powers between differnt levels of government, such as the national government has powers, the state or province has certain powers,  the individual counties or parishes have certain powers, and then the towns and communities have certain powers, the second definitioin is much better, though neither is perfect.
217973
Yes many differences. Look up for each system what their basis  and structure of govt are
1024778
Federalism focuses on the idea of a balance between the local individualized governments of the states and the large unified Country-wide government, i.e. our federal government.  Separation of powers can refer to what is constitutionally given to the federal government and what is left to the states.
878813
If you are asking what the responsibilities of a government should be, I  have always found this definition to be the best...Anything the private sector couldn't, wouldn't, or shouldn't do. If an issue doesn't meet at least one of those criteria, the government should not get involved in it.
295067
Its a form of government, there are monarchies where you have Kind and Queen, Republic, Oligarchies, Democracy like the USA, Socialist, Communist like China, Anarchies, Fundmentalist where supreme religious leader rule.
1150523
Individuality versus state control I think. I read it a long time a ago.
824675
To have a constitutional government elected by the people. But the USA led force do not enjoy the trust of the people. Hence, anything done at the behest of the combined force will be lacking legitimacy. It is under UN supervision that an interim government be constituted to hold election for constituent body to frame the future constitution for Iraq. Then only normalcy will come back.
529994
1.  bicameral sistem is good when a population is divided into several (2,3,4 but not too much) major (non political) groups.  that is like multynational state, or federative state...   So in this case the bicameral parliament makes it possible taking into consideration the interests of several groups (espessially in federal countries - interests of the Union (the whole population), and specific interests of States (population of the states)...\nbut if the population is unified - the bicameral system makes it burockratic, and all the processes are being slow downed...\n\n2. other question is Presidential - Parliamenar... that is a major question, and no one can for sure say which is better.\nin case of peresidential republic, a lot (but not all) is depending on the person of President (and how much population trust him) - so if he is a good one, he can change a lot, fight corruption, etc.  but if he is a bad one, so it will be hard to stop him doin all those terrible things we see in some countries.\nin the case of Parliamtary republic - it is more democratic, but less effective - so it will be very hard to change something to better (although if the population get united, and tries to do something togeter, and they trust each other - everything can be accomplished), but they won't be able to make as big a mess, as a single superpower president can....
131223
Wow, this sounds like a question right off of a school worksheet. Oh how I wish I had Yahoo answers back in my school days. \n\nMy opinion: \n\n1- A divided government will be less concerned with qualifications than approving someone that supports their agenda. \n\n2-The long wait for appointees to be approved can leave jobs unfilled thereby reducing the government's efficiency and effectiveness...as though it had any to begin with.
630912
It's a government of the people, by the people and for the people.
647132
The parliment IS the government.
823836
The type of government can change in a country, depending on who is governing/presiding/leading it.