How do European badgers differ from American badgers?
596820
Raised in England Live in America ... Thats me ?\nThe American Badger is larger and Brown also found on roadside dead .. \nThe English  one was smaller and Black both striped.\nnever found one on roadside dead
1050906
European. American's have best benefits.\nJapanese have best overall care for their employees.\nAmerican's pay the LEAST.
736171
There are several species of ant-eating mammals that have evolved in different parts of the world. These look externally similar because of their adaptations, but may belong to only distant lineages.\n\nIn the Southern Hemisphere, you may find:\n\n- South America: the anteaters here belong to family Myrmecophagidae (order Xenarthra). They lack teeth and have long thin snouts, a very long and sticky tongue, and powerful claws that they use to tear ant and termite nests apart. The giant anteater is terrestrial, while the smaller species are mainly arboreal.\nMore about them:\nhttp://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Myrmecophagidae.html\n\n- Africa: the aardvark is a specialized anteater too. This animal belongs to its own order, the Tubulidentata. \nhttp://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Orycteropus_afer.html\n\nThere's also a species of pangolin distributed in Africa. Pangolins belong to yet another order, the Pholidota:\nhttp://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Manis_temminckii.html\n\n- Australia: there are no placental mammals in Australia, but they still have their own marsupial anteater! The local name of this animal is "numbat", and it shares the typical ant-eating adaptations: long snout, very developed tongue, reduced teeth.\nMore about it:\nhttp://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Myrmecobius_fasciatus.html\n\nIf you compare these animals, you will see their common features. They're a great example of adaptive convergence.
10054
A wolf is a canine (related to dogs.) A wolverine is a mustelid (related to weasels.)
1112115
Wolverine\n\n   1. Wolverine\n      The single species of wolverine is a heavily built animal, immensely strong for its size and capable of killing animals larger than itself.\n\n   2. Wolverine\n      Wolverine, «WUL vuh REEN,» is a fur-bearing animal that lives in the northern woods and tundras (cold, treeless plains) of Europe, Asia, and North America. It is sometimes called the glutton.\n\n   3. Wolverine\n      The wolverine is the largest members of the weasel or mustelidae family in North America.
522219
I don't know raccoons well but I know some people consider the Panda family as being closely related to raccoons(not bears) - so that might be a little interesting fact you can throw in somewhere.  Also in Japan they have shrines where they are worshipped as important spirit creatures. \n\nI know there are raccoons in Asia and North America but I do think there are any in Europe.  They tend to be omnivorous and can be "urbanised" like foxes -living out of garbage cans - again see Tokyo.  Hope this little helps.
996397
You are describing the difference between a Celtic foot and a Saxon foot.  A Celtic foot has straight toes and a longer front of the ball of the foot.  A Saxon foot has angled toes and a shorter front of the foot.\nUnfortunately for me, American shoe fit was brought into this country from German shoe lasts.  The typical shoe is ill-fitting for a Celtic foot.\nSince my family is some of each we have the angle of the English with the length, shape and bunion potential of the Celt.  I despised the shoes of the 1990's which had very short vamps and left me with toe-cleavage.\nHere is the first article I could find to describe it.
411280
As a non American or European,\nI feel EU has a long way to go in terms of the "U". Besides, at the end of the day, Europe united or not will always side up with the US on the really important issues. And unlike the other superpower contenders, Europe shares most of the American values - and actually makes them work better in most cases.
1133075
Because they are different. A frog lives mainly in water, and a toad lives on land. They are not the same kind of animal. You might as well ask why do dogs bark and cats meow? Obviously, that's because that is what they do!!\n\nHope you agree.
206012
When I took English class inmiddle school, I learned that the difference is not only there size but also what there species or characteristics were like. They don't all act the same and have different goals and ways of living. hope this helps. =>
750196
The grizzly bear, Ursus arctos horriblis, has a range in this link which is a picture of a map. Slightly different range than brown bears in general since there are several races of these bears. There's brown bears in Russia I believe. I'll try to track down that information for you to if I can.\n\nFound it! Range for all Ursus arctos animals regardless of race or subspecies!
559427
http://nationalzoo.si.edu/Animals/Birds/Facts/FactSheets/fact-europwhitestork.cfm
583341
This question is miscategorized.\n\nSpecial Education refers to the education and parenting of children with special needs.\n\nThat being said...\n\nA monkey is a primate with a tail (easiest way to tell). There are also other differences like smaller brain capacity.\n\nA chimpanzee is one of the Great Apes (also includes gorillas, etc.). Great apes do not have tails, have a larger brain capacity, often use tools (e.g. a stick for getting at termites, etc.), and can learn to use complex language.
431256
Americans actually comes from Europe because of the immigrants thing, so there are actually brothers. The different is that Americas rule the politic and economic world not the Europe
13486
Certainly.  They may have looked quite different than the 'cows' that they decended from, after much domestication, in the same way that a floppy-eared beagle differs from a modern wolf.  Yet both the beagle and the wolf are of the same species.  All animals, including humans, derive from 'wild' or natural stock.
450432
*Slipping on in* The dog is a mammal in the order Carnivora. Dogs were first domesticated from wolves at least 17,000 years ago, but perhaps as early as 150,000 years ago based upon recent genetic fossil and DNA evidence though there is doubt about the accuracy of this mitochondrial DNA evidence. In this time, the dog has developed into hundreds of breeds with a great degree of variation.\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog\n\nThere is very little genetic difference between any dog and any wolf, coyote, or jackal, etc., so little, in fact, that genetic tests cannot tell how much wolf is in deliberately bred wolf-dogs. The domesticated canines and their wild cousins CAN interbreed.\n\nThe biggest difference is that dogs are domesticated, and wolves are wild animals. What that means is that dogs can be good pets and companions, while wolves are still wild and not suited to living with people. Because they are related, there are a lot of similarities, but wolves represent one end of the spectrum and domestic dogs the other.\n\nWolves are generally bigger and considerably more intelligent than dogs. They are certainly more aware of their environment than dogs, and respond to other animals and humans differently. Wolves don't bond with humans readily the way dogs will. Wolves have a complex pack structure that dogs don't, even when they go feral and pack up. Wolves are constantly testing each other's dominance, while dogs generally accept whatever established hierarchy they live in.\n\nWolves are active and able hunters, while many dog breeds have lost that talent. Wolves are stronger than dogs. Wolves pace, dogs trot. Dogs can be trained, wolves can't (with possible rare exceptions on both sides). In a wolf pack, only the alphas lift their legs to pee (even the alpha female will do this, though not necessarily all the time), and other pack members squat. The alphas will also prevent any other pack members from breeding, and when the pups are born, the whole pack helps raise them. Wolves mate for life (except rare occasions), dogs do not. Dogs go into heat twice a year, wolves only once a year.\n\nWolves are different from dogs by their skull's characteristics, especially the orbital angle, which is the angle between the top of the skull and the side of the skull at the eye socket. This angle is larger (53 degrees or more) in dogs and smaller (45 degrees or less) in wolves. Wolves also have a third larger brain than dogs. Dogs' teeth are smaller, their muzzle is shorter and broader, and their foreheads are broader. Dog's ears are generally more pointed and longer, while wolves' are shorter, wider, and more rounded. Wolves' feet are much larger and more splayed than dogs'. Wolves have a narrower chest and longer, thinner legs. Dogs lack the scent glands, called precaudal glands, underneath the base of the tail.\n\nFor even the most wolf-like dogs, there is a distinct difference in coloration. The colors are much more contrasted and not well-blended on the dog, whereas the wolf's coloration is not contrasted as much and well blended to produce many shades and colors.\n\nWolves are fascinating creatures but they aren't just big dogs. While they are the same genus as dogs (canis) they are a different species: the wolf is canis lupus, the dog is canis familiaris.\nhttp://www.answerbag.com/q_view.php/39319\nhttp://www.lioncrusher.com/animal.asp?animal=35&page=4
834237
Check out the Honey Badger, they are without doubt the hardest mammals on this planet. They were even listed in the guiness book of records as the most fearless. Check out the link.