What Court case ruled that Congress could not force the court to issue the rational basis test?
515034
sorry, i couldn't find anything about it on google.\nhttp://scotthortonshow.com/\nmoney, http://www.philipdru.com/griffin_stream.html
835633
The Warren Court (1953–1969) made several rulings expanding the application of the Constitution to civil liberties, leading a considerable change in the scope of substantive due process. It held that segregation was unconstitutional (Brown v. Board of Education) in public (ie, tax supported) schooling, that the Constitution protects a general right to privacy (Griswold v. Connecticut), that schools cannot sponsor or impose official prayer on students (Engel v. Vitale) nor mandatory Bible readings either (Abington School District v. Schempp), dramatically increased the scope of the doctrine of incorporation (Mapp v. Ohio and Miranda v. Arizona), found that the Fifth Amendment (Bolling v. Sharpe) required equal protection of the laws to all, and held that the Constitution requires active compliance (Gideon v. Wainwright).\n\nThe Burger Court (1969–1986) ruled that abortion was included in the Constitutionally protected right to privacy (Roe v. Wade), made several somewhat contradictory rulings on affirmative action (Regents of the University of California v. Bakke) and campaign finance regulation (Buckley v. Valeo), and ruled that the death penalty was unconstitutional as it violated the cruel and unusual prohibition in the Bill of Rights to the US Constitution (Furman v. Georgia), but later held that it was not unconstitutional after all if done in particular ways (Gregg v. Georgia).
1067836
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."\n\nThere is nothing in the Constitution about a "separation of church and state." Congress is not allowed to pass laws forcing people to participate in one religion or another, and they are not allowed to stop people from practicing their religion. This does not mean that a politician can not use his religious beliefs to form his opinions, character, and doings.
583033
Article in a Newspaper\nGlaberson W. 1999 June 7. The courts vs. scientific certainty. New York Times; Sect 4; 5 (col 3).
344704
The Supreme Court was made of strict conservative judges.  The New Deal policies were quite radical.  The Supreme Court basically rejected several of the New Deal ideas FDR put forth.  For example, the Supreme Court ruled the NIRA (National Industrial Recovery Act) unconstitutional.  The Supreme Court then rejected the AAA (Agricultural Adjustment Act).
9978
try this \n http://www.courts.state.co.us/supct/rules/2004ruleschng.htm
913292
If this is for an essay and you have time for research then you use a treatise on constitutional law. There are also resources online.\n\nThe US Supreme Court rules on the federal constitution. State supreme courts (in NYS the Court of Appeals -- their supreme court is the lowest court of general jurisdiction, following English practice) rule on state constitutions. Here's an example where a state law on double jeopardy was stricter than the federal rule: http://www.uniset.ca/naty/maternity/192P2d449.htm (in federal practice, two different sovereigns can prosecute the same offense, California law (only) is different).\n\nCiting a US Supreme Court case is easy. You go to http://www.lexisone.com (free registration required) or to http://justia.us (uses Google searching rules which may be more familiar to you) and you look for what you want -- key words, etc. Supreme Court cases are cited in the pattern "Smith v. Jones, 123 U.S. 456 (19XX)".\n\nMost Supreme Court constitutional law cases are famous: Roe v. Wade (abortion), Loving v. Viriginia (miscegenation), Lawrence v. Texas (sodomy), Miranda v. Arizona (right to warnings upon arrest), Gideon v. Wainwright (right to counsel). And so on.
319650
Its an "implied right".  Its not in the constitution.
567773
In Chisholm v. Georgia (1792), the Supreme Court held that it had the right to hear cases of individual citizens against states, in particular a state in which they do not reside. The states found that they did not particularly like this situation, and thus they passed the 11th amendment, which essentially gives the several states sovreign immunity from being made a party to a suit.
872811
None.  No law was broken.
417983
That trial was ultimately heard before the Supreme Court. Their opinion is at the site below. The ruling goes over the District ruling in detail.\n\nEdit:\nDon't pay for that crap in the site above. It's just a poorly written essay about the cases, not the opinion itself, which is available freely below.
332521
I found links to the decision by the apeplate court but not by the lower court....hope this helps you though...see below\n\nhttp://www.bccla.org/othercontent/00twusccfactum.html\n\nhttp://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/pub/2001/vol1/html/2001scr1_0772.html
759168
A New York statute forbidding permanent certification as a public school teacher of any person who is not a United States citizen unless that person has manifested an intention to apply for citizenship does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.\n\nHere is the dissenting decision:
1165882
Yes, because Maryland tried to tax the federal bank. And The Federal Government said Maryland couldnt, because Federal Law overrules and supercedes the Law of any state.  Hence a unanimous Courts decison that backed the Federal Governments law.\n\nSo yes.
768443
File a motion assailing the order for you to undergo a psychiatric test on the ground that it is not needed.  Cite valid reasons so that you need not pay yhr exorbitant fee.
1106370
Judges don't make law. The people in Congress make the law.
911235
Nope that is double jeapordy and you can not be tried.\n\nBy the way I think you mean the Constitution and more specifically the Bill of Rights, not the Declaration of Independence.