What do you think of this? Is it not a cleat violation of 1st Amendment rights?
613511
Fascism.....plain and simple
1168085
Leauge and Union footballs are synthetic, not leather, maybe you should get your facts straight before posting such a stupid statement!!!!!\n\n\nAnswer to your Question!!!!!\n\n\nROFLE to the statue of Wally! \n\nGO THE BLUES!!!!!!\n\nAND GOOD ON YA WALLY FOR TAKING IT SO WELL!!!\n\n\nQuick!!!!!!!
609674
the video says its not avalable. but since i see military personel then maybe it is good.\n\n\nhay dude i just saw it and yesss this is awsome it brings us military personell hope to kick there a$$es.\n\nPS i was at school a while ago
1029519
On first consideration, it would appear to be hypocritical, but it isn't.  These are both part of a deeply-held Liberal premise that no one should be held responsible for their actions. They can not accept that actions have consequences.
690750
Yes I think it is. I don't think it would cause problems for the refs though. I think that they shouldn't make an exception and I don't think that they should change the rules. Honestly how would the refs think he is a QB. He will be running different postions and the Refs hopefully have enough of a brain to know the difference by postion. The point though is that the NFL assigns numbers in a certain way. It is for the Fans, the Refs, and the Announcers basically. It also keeps it from the confusion in college where it well just pick a number that isn't retired. Assigning a set of numbers to a postion makes it easy. Then add in that these players are around a lot longer it makes sense to want guidelines.
959648
Why is this just singled out to football players?.. There are alot more sports than that.  They all do the same thing. You kinda sound like a homo in the making.
782766
If it is a team fine, then it goes to the Company or owner of the team to be used as management of that company (team) in repairs, uniforms, or just to help the team. If it is a league fine, then I believe that they say it goes to the NFL or whatever league for the betterment of the league.  Prob still goes into the commish's pocket, but for their sake, I am sure they would say that it is donated or used for advertising or some crap like that.
401463
Outstanding idea.  These people are trespassing on property that they have absolutely no right to be on.  Trespassers really seems to drive home the lack of legality on the issue far better than aliens.  I think this might help get more Americans to realize how much these people are costing them.  It's ok to love your heritage, but it is stupid to think that it is ok that these people are here.
433303
Doesn't bother me one bit. Just thought you were making a fashion statement, looks fine to me. Why would anybody think you are being disrespectful or whatever, to me you should be able to wear what you want and when you want to, that is what freedom is all about is it not?
552995
Thank you for this beautiful montage.  I can't imagine anyone not being impressed, American or not, with the images shown. The music was nice, too. \n\nI almost didn't open it, because I don't want you defining who a patriot is, especially since their definition is almost always at odds with mine. \n\nRemember, donate responsibly.
321937
my opinion? you are a retard for placing LACROSSE under FOOTBALL(AMERICAN).  if you really wanted to place this topic, you should have placed it under OTHER-SPORTS or under CURRENT EVENTS
672350
Caning, paddling, physical abuse is not OK.\n\nI don't care that it's a "tradition". It serves no real purpose.
277002
Absolutely.  It's freedom of speech.  Its the first ammendment of the constitution.(Bill of rights section)
1038635
Would that be like "shooting ourselves in the foot?"  We are really trying to find the "logic" in this one.  Nah, it wouldn't be coveted Yahoo points?  \n\nWhat do you hope to accomplish by acting out the very actions you passionately criticize?  What "incite," oops "insight."  --  a case of "Two wrongs DO make a right?" \n\nCount us out!  It will cost the school money!\n\nEdit:  Bad idea.  We will check with Yahoo to see if an account user can change the rules of this forum.  That is pretty strong language you are using there.  And, no, no one here will march;  we participate in constructive efforts regarding current events.\n\nCorrection:  We did not say we didn't like your posts; we said we do not like the APPROACH of your posts.  This approach creates yet another problem, simple.  Your motivation (to show how much MORE impact YOUR leadership can make than the illegals),  appears cavalier and  misguided.  \n\nWe will, however,  pursue TEGID's  constructive post, instead.  He can count us in.
155601
Wow, I didn't know stuff like that still happened. I've seen if for stadiums but not highways.  I have two answers, contact the ACLU, and start a petition with signatures of all others that are affected by this.  I'm sure they feel like you do, attract as much publicity as you can, public offices don't like to look bad.
309605
It's a states rights issue.  It doesn't fall under the jurisdiction of the Federal Government
578186
Yes. I am sick of judges saying you can't wear a shirt that might hurt someones feelings (the kid in CA who got in trouble for wearing an anti-gay shirt). Are we turning into wusses? What about all those people who wear anti-war or anti-American shirts. I don't like 'em, but I'm not crying to some judge.