Who do you think deserves a place in the Indian team- R.P Singh or Munaf Patel?
594150
munaf patel. he offers variety in bowling when compared to  r p  singh. tht makes him to get the place in the team.
637232
yes the offcial award is given to Sarwan for finding his form back. \nbut it should go to Greg Chappel for letting a boogie team like WI white wash the ODIs.
941909
Not at all...\nBalaji has proved he is a failure in ODIs, since the first match he was introduced.Right now Sreesanth & Munaf' s performance has found far better than Balaji.Same as with experienced Agarkar & Zaheerkhan.VRV played only 2 ODIs & RPSingh also need some more time to being evaluated. Nehra is not at all in the picture now & probably will never be considered also. Only Pathan's recent performances make any sense to ur question. But in no doubt we can say he is better than Balaji...
928127
He deserves a place in the team as a player but he should not be picked by SA board because of the match fixing acceptance. ICC should look into the matter and impress upon SA board to take action as per ICC rules.
1138724
Jugraj Singh was an excellent player but got injured badly in road accident one or 2 years bak.I dont think he has palyed since that in the national team.\n\nWish he comes bak in full form as fast for the good of the game.
613455
RAHUL DRAVID.\n\nHIS HARDWORK NOT VALUED YET BY FANS PROPERLY.\n\nUNSUNG HERO.
1001975
after lara.....i would say sarwan
655743
Yes,Gangully is a better player than other player's like Sreesanth, R.P.Singh, Raina etc. He is the most successful captain than Dravid and other captains. The selector's and captain Rahul Dravid give no chance to Gangully for doing better. They are saying that there is no need for Gangully.But he is made the Team India. I think he is enough capability to return cricket. The captain and selector's not give chance because he is a Bengali boy.But one day will when bengali's are ruled in India then they see the selector's and the other community. I think and whished that Gangully will return to Indian Team like a Tiger of Bengal.
881128
NO THEY BOTH ARE NOT BE GOOD CAPTAIN.  THEY SHOULD TRY FOR YUVRAJ SINGH.
759550
I think they have included him only because of the World Cup. With it heading, India needs someone who can score some runs and also stays at the wicket. He performed well in last tour in Caribbean. So, they are, maybe, looking for a permanent no. 3 batsman. Though risky, but I think it´s a good move by the selectors. Where they have tried players like Venugopal Rao, Suresh Raina, Ghambir, and the most shocking decision came when they included Piyush Chawala for England series. Eventhough he bowled only 14 overs in that match. So, why not Wasim Jaffer?\n\nRawal.
721255
It's good to see Sehwag and Kaif performing. Other batsmen have spent a lot of time on Indian pitches, and Sehwag and Kaif have not. I guess they are adapting faster then the others. There isn't a problem in the team. The games were all close. Middle order batting needs some finetuning. The rest is fine.
681213
My list :\n1. Sachin Tendulkar\n2. Rahul Dravid\n3. Sunil Gavaskar\n4. Gundappa Vishwanath\n5. Dilip Vengsarkar
729581
This achievement is a result of the joint effort by all of above, all really wants to keep their role best in this.\nVengsarkar being new in this team deserves less ( eventhough inclusion of Jaffer, a big blunder)- \n\nWhat this Chappal & Dravid handle with our team, nobody understand.Their selection of final XI batting / bowling changes in each matches, nobody can digest.\n\nLet us look about the recent stories.\nAfter the continous failure of batsmen they never tried to shruffle the batting order according to their ability. They says to have done experiment with Pathan at no.3, that is not much a hilarious idea. Many punch hitters have been sent to these positions and been succesful for all teams. Even Chetan Sharma scored a century at no.3. So sending as Pathan as a punch hitter according to circumstances we can admit, but how we can consider him as a top order batsman..?\nThey never tried Dhoni at no.2 or 3, who can stay around and also go for big hits after being settled. Insted of Pathan they could have tested Dhoni Yuvraj or even Raina as one more chance. Since middle order batting collapsed worstly, Dravid had to get down upto no.5 or 6 followed by Sehwag.\n\nIn DLF cup Sreesanth was called back & he bowled well against WIndies & the next match he has been dropped.\nAgain in SA, Pathan & Sreesanth was included in the 1st match.After the match has been abandoned without a ball being bowled for the second match surprisingly both were omitted. At least 3-4 continous chance should be given for a player to evaluate his performance.\n\nWhat way these guys are thinking, nobody knows. Then Y this consideration is not giving to substitute batsman for long time in place of Raina or Kaif.\n\nOn recent performance of Indian team, a rotation base experiment of players, ( as Australia did before & hence became the best) since we have numerous young talents as well as experienced ones.\n\nThe present Indian team is not bad, but the utilization of it is important. When they R replacing Sehwag it should be DKarthick who was succesful in one day games than Jaffer at domestic matches, and also a better competitor.\n\nBowling we have all are almost at same range, but in SA type of wickets it is better if they go for Saheer,Munaf, Sreesanth,Pathan & Kumble ahead of Agarkar & Harbajan.\n\nHowever let us hope for the best in coming days...
652814
hey don't go to say who is better now. Lets wait how India's performance in foreign countries. Until then, we can't say rahul or saurav is better!
486719
Test Cricket ---------- BRIAN LARA\n                        INDIA - RAHUL DRAVID\nODI-------------------- SACHIN TENDULKAR\nPONTING is a close follower in both forms of the game.\n\nDhoni has a long way to go. Even he cant be compared with these greats.
342040
Harbhajan Singh for ODI as he is extremly economical.\nAnil Kumble for test matches
189350
i m a pakistani, but i m a big big fan of Sachan, he is a fantastic player, he should continue .....it