Bombing civilians in Afghanistan from 10,000 feet , and killing civilian funny  American isn't it ?
602204
If we're killing a**holes like you, I'm all for it.  Saddle up your camel and move on.
227101
The United States military does not target civilians intentionally. Thats what the terrorist do! And yes there was terrorists there before we took Iraq. To be an "Insurgent" you must be a member of a political party. What political party do the so called "Insurgents" belong to? Answer, none! The terrorist hide behind the innocent! If you cant figure that out, your in need of an EDUCATION DEVOID OF LIBERALISM! Would I send my son there? If he wanted to go then I would support him. I can't force him to do anything. He will have to make that choice on his own.
599084
YES!! It's either go over there and fight them or have them come here and kill our civilians.
1018999
No official report corroborates your claims.  You're really embarrassing yourself.  The use of profanity only shows you lack understanding, intelligence, and logic skills.  That is why you let a novice fiction filmmaker spoon-feed you information contradicting everything you saw on that day.  I am sorry for you.\n\nThe terrorists on flight 77 did not need to take off nor land the plane.  The take-off part had been done for them.  They never planned to land.  So what does it matter if they had trouble with landings?\n\nImpossible turns?  Could it be that the terrorists didn't know what they were doing?  I doubt they planned to make those insane maneuvers.  The first attempt at the pentagon was botched, so they had no choice.  They were planning to die anyway, why wouldn't they attempt an "impossible" maneuver?\n\nLight poles at the pentagon were knocked from their break-away bases (new safety design), unlike the poles the filmmaker references in another accident.  Oh, and ripped out of the ground is not damaged???  The poles did exactly what they were designed to do.\n\nhttp://911myths.com/\nhttp://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html\nhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html\nhttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/05/911_documentary_removed/\nhttp://wtc.nist.gov/\nhttp://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html\n\nNow please shut up.
71520
Absolutely! Look at the pentagon! Anyone with half a brain that watched the live CNN coverage of the hole can see... the hold was 15 feet, the plane was 44 tall, there were no wings on the lawn, yet the hole was 15 feet... catch my drift? The hole wasn't big enough to fit that plane. Yes, it is sad that so many people died, what makes it even more sad is that are government is likely to have taken a part in the losses of our own lives. Couldn't imagine what they could have used such an even for....hint hint... Patriot Act... hint hint...
68756
well, they bombed the living hell out of baghdad.\n\nand they push around other countries.\n\nsure, there are real terrorists out there, but i think america is pretty friggin bad aswell.
1116110
First of all, even if you are genuinely from where you claim to be, even if English isn't your first language, Use the spell check feature that was so thoughtfully provided by Yahoo...  \n\nSecondly, as far as I know, we are currently in Afghanistan and Iraq, not Iran....(Do you know something that we don't? Seriously) \n\nThirdly, I assume you mean 'who are they kidding?' and 'who/what kind of people would vote for this?'  That in itself is a flawed premise. American citizens no more voted to go into Afghanistan or Iraq any more than the citizens of those countries decided to set in motion the events of 9-11.  (Also it's a Representative republic, not a democracy....)  \n\nPart of that is allowing people with opposing(if misinformed) viewpoints to speak their minds.  However, while there is 'freedom of speech' here, and I applaud your using that right, there are those Americans who have nothing better to do with their 'freedom' and spend their spare time posting similar comments  to a website such as this and portray themselves as something other than what they truly are.  \n\nI mean no offense, and if such is not the case, you have my deepest apologies...
294922
http://hotzone.yahoo.com/b/hotzone/20060320/hz_afghanistan_0306/blogs2986
763569
The lowest form of moral depravity is to hold others to a standard that you have no intention of living up to yourself, this describes American foreign policy since the turn of the century. You ask a excellent question that challenges even the most die hard maniac or warmonger or whatever you want to call the mainstream American public. As for OBL, your right ,why(you need that bad guy out there running around to maintain your constant state of fear and paranoia when it comes to the public)
1185423
It becomes a genocide when it happens to THEM... If an American dies it's a huge crime, but if my country is bombed and thousands of innocent people get killed, than it is an "act of democracy". When a child next door was killed when NATO bomb fell near our building, I was a horrified witness of "American concern for human rights"... Oh, please leave us to our own tyrants, we don't need your bloody mercy! And how the hell do your soldiers defend America in MY country when we are thousands of miles away from US, and we do not and can not put you people in any danger?\nAmericans should take a deep breath and deeply think about the fact that half of the world was celebrating on the 11th of September... I didn't, and I feel deeply sorry for every victim of that attack, but in the light of what your troops are doing all over the planet - you have certainly had it coming... And it hurts, doesn't it? But, 11th of September was an act of terrorism, while American killings are "peace actions"- oh, for Good's sake wake up!
801341
Nobody needs to die by Napalm. That's one of the worst ways out in my opinion. We do enough damage to our targets with 2000lb guided bombs/missiles with out burning, asphyxiating, and roasting alive the civilians who aren't trying to kill Allied Troops in either Iraq or Afghanistan. \n\nCome on people...get real. Would you really like to see people getting cooked alive on the news? I've been to Iraq twice and I sure as heck don't wish to see people getting cooked alive.
389468
completely agree.  this plane was most likely shot down by the air force, but it makes a great story about those people being heros. god bless them all, but i don't think it's true.  \n\nyou know, it sucks that crap happens, but we do the same damn thing every day in other countries.  we kill innocent people and blow up crap for no reason.  too bad, that's probably why they do it back, then we do it back, and it never stops.  it will only get worse.
1005944
The one who blows stuff up with bombs is a terrorist.\n\nNow note carefully:  I did not make any distinction between one who sets an IED at a roadside, and one that drops a bomb out of a plane.\n\nThe distinction is in the intent, and desired results, not the method of delivery.\n\nTerrorists hurt people for the sake of making a statement.  And I will admit there are times where you have to fight a government on unconventional terms.  But you better be ready for the consequences when you do so, because you are going to get them.\n\n---\n\nSince someone asked me about it by e-mail...\n\nI did not mean to say our troops are terrorists.  They are not.  We have them in a difficult situation, doing a difficult job, and I have a lot of respect for them and what they are going through.\n\nWhat I meant to be saying there is that the people who sent them, ie- Bush and Rumsfield and Cheney, the ones who decided we did not need to observe the Geneva Convention any more, that we can jail people forever, and have the right to torture them,  THOSE people I put on close to the same level as the terrorists.  They are bringing us down to that level.\n\nI fully support our troops, and am frankly in awe about how many of them are doing their job after this period of time.  And yes, there are a couple that have not.  But the vast majority are holding up a lot better than I think I could in that situation.\n\n-Dio
745179
no, cos you would kill more of your own then the enemy, i mean look at the u.s military they killed more allied troops in friendly fire incidents then the enemy did, proof that short sighted ppl are a danger to your own side.
87462
Yea Shure Right lets try to set a new record. does the prez get a fluffy toy if we set a new record? if that is the goal to kill our troops why bother sending them so far? we could just ship them 500 feet off shore and sink the ship? or fly them into the remaining buildings of New York. Even better we could hire bin laden to just shoot our troops.\nAnd our next prez will have to set a even bigger high score. where next Canada.\nOh one more thing. It suckes that even one of our fine men and women died, but if you think 2260 is a number to high to pay for anyones freedoms on earth then you should start fighting your real foe The Automobile, now that kills
420437
I agree with you, it is hard to imagine Americans needing more evidence than that to retaliate. I think not only should we retaliate, we should do it harder. American soldiers know what they are doing when they enlist, they are putting their lives on the line to keep things like 9/11 from happening.Remember Pearl Harbor? Japan will think twice next time. We should never allow anyone to attack our civilians. A show of force may deter the next guy on the list from doing the same.
670475
What a disgusting and immoral rant! You like to see people killed? American or not, we are all human beings...man