Would the term clone be suitable in reference to the newly formed panarians? explain?
596989
clones are exact copies of the mother cell. clones from a single cell are called monoclonal. this term is often used in immunity. EG: monoclonal antibodies. As for panarians i dont know what is it? plz explain your question better.
39793
I think the word utopia is greek. It literally means "nowhere". The term "utopian fiction" means that a perfect society can't exist because everybody has a different opinion of what it should be.
1181051
Clones aren't really an improvement over the original. They are at best a copy, even if they are not defective. So, I can't see using clones to create a "perfect race." Just stagnation.
786627
Cloning means extracting the DNA from a living thing and using it to create creating a genetically identical copy.\n\nAs there are no flying pigs in existence there is nothing to clone to create one.\n\nWhat I think you might be referring to is the potential creation of a CHIMERA. This is a blend of two creatures achieved by splicing together their respective DNAs. Obviously the resulting creature would no longer be a pig or, say, an eagle but might be something in between - a "peagle" perhaps. Conceivably the insertion of the genes which turn legs into wings and increase the flight muscles might just result in something like a flying pig - a frightening prospect! The main question is - would it taste like ham or chicken?
55395
Human cloning has long been a subject of speculation in science fiction. Science fiction speculation has included:\n\nthe use of cloning for "spare parts" for transplantation, typically with accelerated growth of the cloned parts \ntransferring one's mind into a younger clone body, as a way of achieving immortality \nclones somehow having a telepathic affinity for one another \nApart from the first, these ideas are currently pure speculation. (Telepathy has been reported by many indentical twins, for example seemingly unfounded anxiety of one twin, when the other who is far away is in trouble, or even more pronounced ESP, so the same could conceivably apply to artificial clones.
1063767
memory has nothing to do with cloning. clones are legal humans, just with identical DNA as some one else. no your children wouldnt be the clones children, the clone is one persons DNA put into the womb of a woman, and then it gets birthed like any other baby. nothing is the same except the dna, and especially not the age, relatives, or memory.  of corse its murder to kill a clone, the clone would be a person just like you or I. clones don't even necessarily grow up to look the same as their parent clone.
918014
Neo=new\nCon=conservative
509667
I would not want cloning after I die for the simple reason that there is only one of me. However for a clone to be me it would have to have my memories, my talents, my thoughts, etc. ,the clone would look like me but have a completely different life than I, so if they could take out the weaknesses from my genes and make a clone that doesn't have any major health problems I would consider letting them clone me after I die.
602448
sure, but that doesn't mean that the child is going to be exactly me.  We are formed by our environments, if I get a lot of sun that may mean that I am going to have a lot of moles and freckles, but my clone wouldn't.  The clone also would probably eat a lot better than I did when I was little, so they would develop better than I did, meaning that they could end up taller, fatter, bustier, and all that.  \nI am also unique by the childhood that I have, many of my ideas and mental characteristics were formed due to my upbringing but my clone would not have the same upbringing, so they may be much smarter or dumber than I or they may be republican, I don't know.
3468
A human clone, if succesful, is just a twin of the original person (but younger).  That's seems morally legitimate.  But today the success rate would be very low; some of the failures would be horrible birth defects.  So it would be unethical to attempt cloning a human today.  Eventually, if it could be done reliably, it would be ethical (but getting there from here seems awfully difficult).
1155507
This question DOES have an answer. The answer is that since souls do not exist, no soul would be entering another's body. When, yes WHEN, a human is cloned (unfortunately someone WILL do it), the clone will have the same genes. They will look alike and theirs traits that are determined by genetics and not environment will likely be the same as well. However, they will still be two different human beings. Both are still alive and the clone will be a baby. You won't feel any different. Why would you? There are many ethical implications involved with cloning. It would be sort of like identical twins (who share same DNA and fingerprints etc) but the result would be very odd indeed especially if the two talked to one another. How alike would they be?
438242
Every dust particle is alive and carries the breath and LOVE of GOD.\nEarth is not without SOUL .You acquire your identity even through normal reproducion because of this planet's matter. Every electron has a soul of ots own.\nIt conveys that we all make you , you do not make us.We LOVE GOD but you as humans LOVE only images of Gods so imagined and so created by men.\na clone will recieve more concentrated form of love from the Mother like a God.\nIt will prove that GOD resides in the heart and soul of a mother and HER LOVE for HER creation.\nALL RELIGIONS WILL BE PROVED WRONG WHICH IS URGENT REQUIREMENT FOR SURVIVAL OF MANKIND AS ONE SPECIE. mraju692yahoo.com
306392
If you could give us an idea of what the science fiction words are, then I'm sure that many people would be happy to help you.\n\nIn the meantime, here's a good online resource that may help you answer your own questions,\nhttp://scifipedia.scifi.com/index.php/Main_Page
95970
Not.\n\nI doubt one could ever have the same relationship with the cloned being as you did with the original. What if the relationship sucked and totally taints the memory of the original? What if the original had a sucky life and the cloned is condemned to it all over again? And the fear and grief of eventually losing that person all over again, just isn’t worth it. \n\nSome things are best as originals.
791983
Clone\n\nThe term "clone" is rooted in the Greek word "klon," meaning twig or shoot. The concept of cloning gained a foothold in the world of gardening where a twig or shoot could be used to create an identical plant in entirety.
1170509
To be Leary of such is honest but what if I needed a new part for my body and you could clone it?  What would you say then?  If God allowed us to clone people,  I believe he would not be cruel and deny that cloned person a soul.  Also another question arises which is a practical one.  If a person is cloned, then they have the same DNA and fingerprints.  What if that person commits a crime and you have no alibi?  You might be mistakenly arrested.
379599
There was a claim back in 2002 by a kooky UFO cult known as the Raelians that they had successfully cloned a human, whom they named Eve.  They refused to provide any evidence of their claim, and have never produced the promised 'follow-up' clones.\n\nThey did found a company called Clonaid which was supposed to build 'Babytronic' uterine replicators which would allow home cloning or something, but again never produced any tangible results.  They did try to get supermodel Giselle Bundchen to be their spokesperson, but she wisely turned them down.\n\nHere is the rather insane web-page of their company, Clonaid http://www.clonaid.com/news.php\n\nThe only evidence they provide for their authenticity is the fact that it would be mean to lie about something like that, so they would never do it.\n\nThey also sell a cell fusion device called the RMX2010 for only $9220 which looks remarkably like an ammeter you can probably buy at Radio Shack for about $20.