what is Obligation in Grammer? Expressing Obligation please?
609087
Obligation is the requirement to do something.  It can be expressed using modal verbs like MUST and HAVE TO.  These verbs are followed by the bare infinitive (the infinitive without "to").  \n\n"You must wear shoes."\n"You have to wear shoes."
793737
You're alive. Do something. The directive in life, the moral imperative was so uncomplicated. It could be expressed ... \nBikhari hui zulfon ko girahgeer bana lo. Rakhna hai mujhe qaid to zajeer ... to the hiphil imperative of the verbal root '-I-h () meaning "bring thou up by. ...\nhttp://my.opera.com/squibc4/blog
896219
an auxiliary verb is used in front of another verb to alter the meaning,mainly expresses;\nwhen something happens, by transforming a tense of the main verb. eg;ishall\npermission ,obligation\nability to do something\nthe likelihood of something happening \nbe\ncan\ncould\nshall\nshould\ndo\nmay \nmight\nmust\nought\nwill\n would\nhave\nlet
614833
Well i speak English but i have no idea what an article in the English language is. I see some of your mistakes though, One would not say "I go for walk" One would have to say "I am going for a walk" or "I'm going for a walk" I always make these mistakes in my french classes as well.  If you want to send your paper to me I'll read over it and have my boyfriend who knows a lot more about English rules read over it also.
61830
First, let me suggest a great book called "Eats, Shoots, Leaves" by Lynn Truss. I think you would appreciate it.\n\nSecond, let me embarrass myself by tackling your sentence.\n\n(H)ey, what(')s or what is up with my gramm(a)r?\n\nThose were the obvious errors. Of course, I reserve the right to find more, but that is it for now.
1022563
This means the sentences are in the passive tense, rather than the preferred, active tense.\n\nExample:\n\n"This was the one that I had wanted." - passive\n\n"I wanted this one." - active\n\nMost of the time, active tense is preferred.
639827
You have trouble using articles correctly.  You should study indefinite and definite articles (the, a, that, etc.).  Also, one would say "Would you please evaluate my English on the following links (or it is okay the way you wrote it "on these links")?"  To ask "Can you..." queries the listener to whether they are capable of doing the action requested.  To use the conditional is more appropriate and polite.
154059
It's latin and it's a form of the verb 'loquor', meaning to speak. I think its English equivalent would be 'speaking'.
739657
Not optional grammar is.
1112909
Oportet vivere. ("It is necessary to live." "It behooves one to live.")\n\nI wouldn't translate the "one" literally because using "one" to represent an impersonal/generic subject is something that is done in English but not in Latin or in Romance languages. It's much more common to use an impersonal verb conjugation (such as "oportet" meaning "it is necessary") than to try to translate "one" as a generic subject using a universal pronoun such as "unus" or "aliquis". Likewise in French, you can say "on doit vivre" ("one must live:), but it sounds much more authentic and more polished to say "il faut vivre" (" it is necessary to live").\n\nIn short, opt for a translation that sounds more authentic rather than a literal translation. If you're still not sure which one to choose, pick the top three and email them to a Latin professor at a local university to ask him to select the best translation (i.e. not necessarily the most literal translation). Just be sure to be polite when you ask, and you might consider offering him a small fee in exchange for his services. After all, professional translators get paid for their translations, and university professors have better things to do than sit around all day translating tattoos for for people. I mean, I don't blame you at all for seeking professional advice, but language professors get those kinds of requests all the time and resent being expected to translate things on the fly for no compensation. It's always wiser (and more polite) to treat a request for a translation as a business deal, even if it will only take him two minutes.\n\nBest of luck!
1029996
Exclamatory, Declarative, Interrogative, Imperative
216506
"The first step to keep..." This is technically called an "infinitive of purpose". When a complement answers the question "What for?" you need either of these structures:\n\nto + infinitive verb (infinitive of purpose).\n\nfor + noun (e.g.: The first step for a healthy state).
639349
Guarantee: To accept responsibility for an obligation if the entity with primary responsibility for the obligation does not meet it. \n\nWarranty: An agreement between a buyer and a seller of goods or services, detailing the conditions under which the seller will make repairs or fix problems without cost to the buyer.
1059877
"Be did?" This is interesting. Wish I could understand what it means.
314262
have to\nThe verb phrases have to and have got to express necessity and obligation. They differ subtly in meaning from the auxiliary verb must. While all of these verbs can be used to express a command or warning (You have got to leave now. You must not shout), have to and have got to are somewhat more forceful than must in expressing necessity. There has (or has got) to be some mistake conveys a bit more emphasis than There must be some mistake. Only have to can form verb phrases with may, be, and have. We can say I may have to go but not I may have got to go. We can say You are having to do a lot more work these days but not You are having got to … We can say The town has had to repave its main road but not The town has had got to … In spoken English people often drop the have from have got to, as in We got to get up early. But in formal writing got to is not ordinarily considered acceptable.\n\nmust\nThe auxiliary verb must is used to express necessity, obligation, and probability: Plants must have water in order to live. Swimmers must take a shower before entering the pool. You must be joking. Unlike other auxiliaries like can and may, must has no past form like could or might: They insisted we must wait until tomorrow. In this regard must resembles need and ought to.
859163
In an imperative statement (in other words, when you give a command), the subject is "you".  Example:  "Get the telephone!"   We don't say "you", but it is the subject.
84992
What do you need help with, grammer?