Are you a DNA descendant of Jesus and Mary Magdalene?
612571
Well I can turn water into wine...
504639
I think it is very possible they were married, but maybe not.  There is some evidence that he may have been married and some that says the person he was married to was Mary Magdalene.  The big thing is - does it matter?  I don't believe that if he was married it changed his message at all.
666291
if you read your the Bible then you will find that there is Mary the mother of Jesus , Mary Magdalen , and Mary the sister of Lazarus..so therefore there is three Marys that i remember............and they are all diffent people...
496128
DNA can trace a long ways back. There are "markers" that persons of the same relation will carrying. one set of markers is for your mothers side and another from your fathers side. if i rememeber right the mothers side is a little eaiser to trace back. :)
562431
No this is not true. I saw a documentary on Discovery channel, and the Da Vinci code is fiction pure and simple, created by three guys in France back in the seventies. All the documents were faked, and their is no evidence that Jesus married Mary Magdalene or fathered any children. It's just something to confuse people, none of it is true. Check your local listings for the Discovery/Times channel and they'll be playing it again, I think it's titles "the real Da vinci code" or something along those lines.
783066
OK..\nIt does not matter if James had a son or whatever because Mary was a virgin so she didn't use Joseph to have Jesus...\ntherefore no one is related to Jesus\nBut in the bible says that we humans were made by his image..\nwould you like to visit my church?\nI would glady explain everything to you....
27681
The new guy has obviously been influenced by the _da_Vinci_Code_ or other, similar works that posit that Jesus was married (most likely to Mary Magdalene), and likely had children through that union.\n\nThere are a couple verses in the gospels (depending on your translation - I'm looking at the New International Version) where Jesus is referred to as having brothers; I'd look specifically at Matthew 13:54-56, which says \n\n"54 Coming to his hometown, he began teaching the people in their synagogue, and they were amazed. "Where did this man get this wisdom and these miraculous powers?" they asked. 55 "Isn't this the carpenter's son? Isn't his mother's name Mary, and aren't his brothers James, Joseph, Simon and Judas? 56 Aren't all his sisters with us? Where then did this man get all these things?"\n\nWhile scholars have argued that "brother" might actually mean "cousin" or "other close male relative", the text wouldn't directly support that.\n\nThe wife and children thing can't be disproved Biblically - but neither can it be proven.  Some take the absense of direct reference to a wife as proof, while say that any man referred to as a rabbi/teacher would need to be married to have that status (as per the culture of the time).  Either way, there isn't anything that can be used definitively either way.
332664
I have read the Da Vinci Code.  I don't believe the story it has of Mary Magdalene.  Because for one, Mary Magdalene was never tagged as a prostitute in the Bible.  \n\nThis is the story I believe about Mary Magdalene: http://www.jesusdecoded.com/catholicchurch8.php
656137
We have common ancestory.  We didn't come from them(that would be akin to saying that someone came from their brother or sister) related-Yes, decended from-No.\n\nThis question seems to be a curious religious "fish hook". In mentioning "came from" in the question it seems to indicate there is a certain level of acceptance that there is such a thing as decendancy, lineage etc(and that it is possible that it could happen between species).  The theory of evolution is nothing more than lineage over the loooong term.  Find some pictures of your ancestors, think about how many generations seperate you.  Set aside for a moment any preconcieved notions you may have, take a good look into the intelligent eyes of a chimpanzee.  Maybe we aren't that different after all.    \n\nDo you look like a monkey?  Yea, and I smell like one too.  ;)
744941
No.. there are two marys.. mary the mother of Jesus.. and Mary Magdalen.. the prostitute Jesus saved from getting killed by a mod..
329978
Its about the theory that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene & their blood line still exists protected by a secret society called Priority of Sion. \n\nThough this is the main theme od Da Vinci Code, there are also many controversial facts such as Jesus was a mortal just like any of us, the church has been putting down the role of women in the society & many such things.\n\nIts worth a read, very intresting.
996156
Never, just like their DNA, and the shape and structure of their eyes, their finger prints will not be the same, some time there are born identical twins to parent that look alike 99.9% but the only thing that make them different is that .1% and their DNA and finger prints, it is just a divine way of God creating his creatures,
798007
Any supposed line of descendants of Jesus (such as "who fathered three children") is to be considered not credible.\n\nAs for the origins of the "first people of Ireland" ...perhaps some associate them with the ideas of the British-Israelites. Or you might consider http://www.irelandseye.com/irish/people/settlers/prehist1.shtm which, of course, includes evolutionist-type dating.\n\nThere is another legend which some believe, of David's descendants being connected with British Royalty. British-Israelism or similar named groups. Some of them believe that the Lost Ten Tribes of the Northern House of Israel’s descendants are to be found in the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic and kindred peoples of today.
383954
Personally, no. Mary was a Virgin, Immaculately Conceived, and was assumed into Heaven as a Virgin. \n\nHowever, some scholars believed that St. Joseph was a widow who was elderly and had grown up children  from that previous marriage and married the adolescent Mary as a favor to the High Priests of the Temple. Hence, Jesus had step-brothers. Other say that his reference to brothers is synonymous to cousins, which is how it was used back then, and still used today. \n\nOn Suday of Resurrection, the History Channel had a program about him, and on this topic you have brought up. The web History Channel web site might provide links to that show, as well as internet links to follow up on this subject.
443216
Your great great grandfather or mabe your cousine. Am I right?
602754
Yes, we are all relatives of Noah. He had his sons and their wives with them, along with his wife. But, the first man and woman were Adam and Eve, so we are all descendants from them.
659105
have you ever read the bible ? no  ? o k\n\nwow these are all worthless. ill just pick 1 at random .. \n27(my baseball #)\n\nthe geneology in matthew is Josephs line\nthe geneology in luke is Marys line. \n\n\nall 101 these can be cast aside with a TINY bit of research. this question makes you look stupid