How many liberals  believe that 9/11 was a "vast right wing conspiracy"?
595943
This is what's truly hilarious about the liberals. They swear to God (strike that, they don't believe in God)- swear to whatever the hell they believe in that W is an idiot, and we're all mindless drones for thinking other wise. They laugh for months if he so much as mispronounces something (apparently further proof that he's retarded), and yet...\nthey actually believe that this same guy could have masterminded 9-11 just so he'd have an excuse to go after Saddam and steal his oil. WTF kind of mindset is that, anyway?\n\nBut what else can we expect from people who keep re-electing Ted-dui Kennedy?
950996
I truly appreciate this question. \n\nTo all those who give the token thumbs down to a question like this, or use the juvenile retort of "conspiracy-nut job," please, take some time to seriously analyze the unanswered questions surrounding the 9/11 attacks. \n\nInterestingly, the burden of proof is no longer on the "conspiracy theorists" but on those who have stood by the government's official claim that 19 hijackers with box-cutters financed by Bin Laden, crashed 4 planes without any chance of prevention. \n\nThe following is irrefutable: \n\nFact: Bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. Check out the FBI website. Reason? They don't have sufficient evidence to convict him. Perhaps this is why Bush said he really doesn't care about him. \n\nFact: There are hundreds of televised claims from that day that witnesses heard or felt explosions prior to the collapse of the towers.  These include firefighters, police, newsreporters, and civilians. \n\nFact: 47 story - WTC 7, we are told, collapsed from fire alone. This was unprecedented for a steel frame building. Furthermore, it fell symetrically in free fall speed. Science and deductive reasoning will easily support the cause of this collpase as demolitions. Fire does not have the energy to do this.  \n\nFact: The steel from WTC was shipped overseas before an investigation was even opened. This is the greatest destruction of evidence in the history of forensics. \n\nFact: Thousands of first responders have been afflicted and some have even died from respiratory failure. The government will not support investigations into the many reports which show that these heroes have micronized steel, glass, and concrete in their lungs. Fire, and the collapse from gravity would not produce this type of dust. Demolitions, however, supports the evidence. \n\nFact: We were told that NORAD didn't intercept any of the planes that day. This spans from about 8:24, the time of the first report of a hijacking, to 10:06, when the last plane crashed in Penn. NORAD's has a prior track record of intercepting planes within minutes. Standard Operating Procedure was not followed that day. They also changed their story several times. \n\nFact: The investigation into 9/11 was initially opposed by the Bush Administration. The 9/11 families pressed for one. They got it, but with remarkable conditions. The total costs of the investigation, including the NIST report, was only $16 million. The cost to investigate the Space Shuttle crash - $50 million. The cost to investigate Clinton - $42 million. In other words, the greatest failure of our defenses deserved less money than the shuttle and Clinton's perjury. What an insult to the 9/11 families. \n\nFact: No one has been fired for 9/11. \n\nFact: The spike in put options on Boeing, United Airlines, and American Airlines were never investigated. Millions are still unclaimed. This indicates someone knew. Why not check out this lead? \n\nFact: The August 6, 2001 Public Daily Briefing Memo was titled BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE IN THE US. Yet prior to its declassification, we were told by Rice and Fleisher that there were no warnings. Had this news been made public, couldn't travelers, law enforcement, and the airline workers  have been a little more guarded or informed to notice something that day? Wouldn't we have guessed right away that the first report of a hijacking was indeed a terrorist? Or would we have dismissed it as "one bad pilot" and continued to read "My Pet Goat" while America was attacked?\n\nThe bottom line - If the deaths of 3000 people occurred under the control of a corporation, people would have been brought up on charges of criminal negligence. Despite the growing movement and mounting evidence into the WTC collapses, the government still has made up its mind that it is fire that brought these buildings down and that 9/11 was simply a failure of imagination. Th
670766
9/11 is when General Pinochet seized power in Chile with the help of the CIA.\n\nIronic that the bunch of terrorists carried out attacks in the USA on that anniversary.\n\nStill, if you think a missile hit the Pentagon or that a UFO hit the 2nd Twin Tower then I suspect that you love conspiracies.\n\nFor me, I believe that a group of mad Muslims hijacked several planes and crashed them into US buildings in the name of "Allah". Nothing sinister, no Government collaboration, just a major terrorist attack against the USA.
1043195
yes... they also assume that about 80 percent of America believes the same thing that they do... even after about 48 percent of America voted for Kerry... and that was when Bush was popular, compared to now... \n\nIn short... they are in denial... listen to them... all media is against them, except for 1 or 2 clearly bias networks...\nthey think liberals are both extremely stupid and yet they control all educational institutes... and liberals want to take over America and turn it into a communist dictatorship... this is what some of them actually say on here... \n\nmany of them clearly have no base in reality...\n\nAnon28: welcome to Yahoo Answers!... I've seen that one before
268710
liberal conservative?
1061491
Check out "FahrenHYPE 9-11". It's the liberal equivalent of the Mohammed cartoons! INFIDELS!!!!
525265
Do you believe everything liberals tell you?
1023681
the left probably has more... but I think that the ones on the left are believed by fewer of those on the right...\n\nfor example... 9-11 was caused by the government... believe it or not, the VAST majority of those on the left do not believe this, but those who do are quite loud about their beliefs, so it may seem more actually believe it...\n\non the conservative side... you have the "liberal media"... that it seems almost every conservative believes... (perhaps it's the same though and only they are the loudest, I'm not so sure?)... \nclearly while some media outlets do have some bias of some degree, the VAST majority of what the major news networks say is true and based in fact...
434669
Liberals do not want to stop fighting terrorism. They just feel that the "war on terrorism" has been perverted, and become a "war on everyone that pi$$es us off". Think about bin Laden for a minute. The neo-cons like to bring up 9/11 in every single speech they make, but what about bin Laden? He is responsible for 9/11. Where is he? Bush has gone from his primary objective being to bring bin Laden to justice to not thinking about him much. \n\nbin Laden is a terrorist who attacked America. Saddam is a terrorist who attacked his own people. Where should the majority of our troops be, defending America or defending Iraq?\n\nI support our troops 100%. It's the idiots in the government, most of whom have never fought in a war, that I don't support.\n\nBoth Liberals and Conservatives love America, but I say that if you love something or someone, then you are particularly concerned when that something or someone turns out to be broken or sick. When your child has a fever, you don't waste time bragging to everyone that he's an honor student, you take him to the doctor. And you don't accuse the doctor of hating your child when he points out that he has an infection. You thank the doctor, you get the prescription antibiotics, and you work hard to heal your child.\n\nBoth Liberals and Conservatives love America, but Conservatives seem to love America in a "my country can do no wrong" way. Conservatives act like the battered spouse in an abusive relationship. No matter how many times he comes home and beats her, he's still a good man.\n\nLiberals see America in a "let's make it better" way, like the sick child I mentioned earlier. Unfortunately, lately there have been a lot of liberals saying "America is sick" and very few saying "this is how we cure it".\n\nSorry, I strayed from the question.
1150773
Don't be mean, don't confuse liberals with facts.  They are going to believe whatever MoveOn.org spoonfeeds them about Iraq, WMDs, and 9-11 conspiracies.  Their heads would explode if they were actually held accountable for the crap that comes out of their mouths.\n\nI always find it funny that libs will call President Bush a retarded idiot who can't find his butt with both hands ... and then in the same breath call him the anti-Christ evil genius that only want to make money and destroy the planet.  I wish libs would get their propaganda together.
1115608
Absolutely! What produces terrorism abroad produces ultra-right wing conservative here. Don't believe me? Look at James Dobson, one of the most vile human beings on the planet.
1128650
The "OBL and the 7 dwarfs" theory is probably the least plausible conspiracy case for the 9/11 attacks.  Unfortunately, it is the only one that has been investigated in "back-assward fashion".\n\nNormally, in a real investigation, you look at motive, opportunity, and resources.  You investigate and gather the facts on those things, and then you build a case that fits the facts.  You don't start with an instant conclusion and then work backwards to change or cherry-pick facts to fit your conclusion.  In science they call this "pathological science", where a mad scientist comes up with a wierd theory and then proves it with narrow examples...and facts contradicting this theory are summarily tossed out, changed outright, or ridiculed.  In law, this kind of theorizing leads to "kangaroo courts", where the "burden of proof" is on the defendent and not the prosecution.\n\nThe real video evidence, science, 1st-hand witness statements, and paper-trails all contradict the official conspiracy theory.  Will we ever get a confession of those that pulled the strings?  Of course not, but it is enough for Americans to wake up, see the truth, and those that did perpetrate the attacks won't be able to pull off another one.
305702
The same crazies who say that the U.S. government was behind 9&#92;11.....lots of them.
259211
Yes i do believe that 9/11 was a conspiracy!! People who say otherwise are just in denial or are too afraid to dig up dirt regarding the evidence which definitely pinpoints at the US government!! \n\nTo those people just visit this website and watch the video!\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6545313046180631815&q=contrary+9%2F11&pl=true\n\nI know you'll believe it was a conspiracy after you watch this!
86727
I know you wouldnt think so, by listening to the media, but most americans agree with you. Liberals didnt complain when Clinton was wiretapping  suspected terrorists. Its such a double standard and more and more americans are waking up and seeing the truth. Bush is doing a better job than any liberal could do.
290535
A great deal is implied in your question. If I read it as I think you intended it, you mean to illicit some of the various conspiratorial beliefs surrounding the events of that infamous day.\n\nThe official, and still controversial version of events, are recored in the “9/11 Report.” You can get a copy for free here : http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911... if you care to “thumb” through the 580 some odd pages of report.\n\nAs an aside, there were no 737's used in attacks. Two 757's and Two 767's were used to attack economic, military and, it is believed, political targets. I say believed because in addition to the World Trade Center, it is believed that the White House and The Capitol were among the originally intended targets. \n\nWhile you can get a chronological breakdown of what happened that fateful day, most people seem to miss the fact that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda succeeded in proving that radical Islam and the West were at war. This is a fact that few American leaders from either party chose to recognize,  until 3,000 Americans were murdered on 9/11. See references to the prior WTC, the Khobar Towers, Embassy's in Kenya and Tanzania, and the USS Cole bombings, all of which occurred before 2000 and about which nothing was effectively done.\n\nIf you are inclined to entertain conspiratorial ideas about 9/11, fine, but keep this in mind;  contradictions don't exist. If your faced with one, check your premises because one or more of them must be wrong. This is not to say that conspiracy is impossible, but rather, try to reconcile the facts before moving on to conjecture. \n\nWe remain at war to this day.
1077136
Why ask? You don't even believe 9/11 happened the way it did and you apparently don't respond well to questions as to what you do believe happened. \n\nAs to this question, absolutely it should have been responded to exactly the way it was except that our government should stop worrying about what liberals say and carry out the war with all the necessary force. Further, I just don't understand why some believe that Saddam Hussein or the Taliban is so much preferred to the U.S. democratic political system. That's what we know so that's what we teach. Seems to have served you well.