"why is it good to add more trees in the rain forest and what is the advantage?"?
604902
you get more air from the trees, it takes away carbon dioxide, and it protects the ozone from further damage.
192873
Dont listen to teh idiot above, how could cutting down trees help improve the ozone layer???\n\nThe answer is A because trees convert CO2 to O2, the more trees you cut down the less trees you have to make 02 from CO2 so there will be an increase in CO2
670552
I believe that there is already a logging system in place. Carefully controlled logging actually helps forests regenerate. There are many animals that cannot live in dense, old forests. Deer, for example, thrive on saplings and young vegetation. There is a huge difference between clear-cutting and logging.
45018
1. Remember trees need carbon dioxide and turn them to oxygen? less trees means more carbon dioxide... which means global warming (CO2 is also called the greenhouse gas.)\n2. Trees need water... less trees means more water flowing down when it rains. also, soil erosion is an issue.
1002784
yup! i agree with u....... \nthe  remedy is to atleast plant more trees and try not to mess up with mother nature in the name of developments.... \ndevelopments are good......... but who will be there to utilise it? \n\nwe are doing lot of bad than good to mother earth.... we need to start now.........
160700
It's not the money!\nIt's the fact that the earth will be terribly out of balance and mother nature will take a drastic nose dive if there are not more forests.  All life will probably die.\nOur atmosphere is created by all the plants and trees giving off all their oxygen.  Earth would not be the beautiful life supporting place that it is without trees.
100562
Slash and burn allows people to take temporary profit from the rainforest but at the sacrifice of thousands of years of evolution and natural development.  There have probably been hundreds of cures for cancer that will never have a chance because those species that had it are gone.\n\nGoing, going, gone.\n\nIf the rich of the world would help the poor they wouldn't need to slash and burn the forests.
472817
I think it would help in your theory,due to more greenhouse gasses would be assimilated by more trees.\n\npart of the problem with global warming is that much of the planets eco systems are being destroyed without being replendished (south america tree harvesting)
459024
the positive side is they get some financial aids to maintain the rainforest and more publicity to the rainforest so more research done,\nthe negative side more intrusions to the area disturbs the natural habitat
117277
There are no advantages or disadvantages, it's just a short term weather cycle.  It's like asking what's the advantage to rain?  It you're asking, it doesn't influece global warming or any crap like that.
832178
Advantages:\n* You get to know more about the world around you.\n* More species would be discovered.\n* More scientists on the planet Earth.\n* More subjects for you to study in school.\n* More technology for our convenience.\n\nDisadvantages:\n* Scientists die in labs because of accidents.\n* Too many species to keep track of.\n* Animals disturbed from habitats.\n* Plant species taken from environment.\n* Rare species threatened.
22008
Just like some people said, big tree are more easy to attach wind...people like to talk about BIG people, that's why :)
387994
It provides a cover for the animals and nutrients that reside there, so that in hot, dry weather, or rainy storms there is covering to keep things from seeping out.\nIt also provides a habitat for many creatures.
756237
I personally have not invested in Reforestation, but I have seen many of the effects first hand in the area of Papua New Guinea that my mother is from.  In a monetary sense I think it is a bit of a crock.  The rainforest Hard wood that recieves the highest prices takes at least 20 years to grow before you can harvest enough wood to make a decent enough return on the cost of collecting and dividing the tree into peices.  I can not see how they would be able to give you these kinds of returns over the shorter periods, especially if there is no decrease in the amount of illegally harvested timber on the world market.  I think that they would be able to command a higher price if they can prove that the wood they supply is harvested ethically, but I do have serious doubts as to the ability of this firm to make these kinds of returns to investors.\n\nI believe that the Re-forestation  of Rainforest would have significant effects Environmentally and Economically for the associated communities, however the time span for regrowth of Rainforest and the bio-diversity that accompanies it is much longer than all the projections listed on this website.  I would not call them a scam but I think that they are being a little overoptimistic.  I believe returns are possible however I do not believe these numbers are possible and I can not understand why there is such a large jump in the projected figures for year 22 and year 25 as tree growth is a pretty linear affair.  I am all for Invetment with environmental benifits but I think these guys are dreaming.
473660
A forest has lots of wood, a wood doesnt have lots of forests
144817
To give back to the environment. (one can never have too many trees)
627376
The only aswer to this is- grow more and more trees. Trees produce oxygen, it helps to increase rainfall, it helps to maintain temperture. so grow more and more trees and save earth.