what is different between "one light one sun" and "big beautiful planet"?
610495
its missing love n peace but nothing much apart from that
1082359
New planet, discovered by the Samuel Oschin Telescope at the Palomar Observatory near San Diego, Calif., on Jan. 8, 2005,  is yet to be formally named.\n\n(This  newly-discovered object is more distant than the mysterious planetoid SEDNA discovered in 2003. Sedna is designated 2003 VB12.)\n\n Is at least as big as Pluto and about three times farther away from the Sun than Pluto. It is very cold and dark.It is currently about 97 times farther from the sun than Earth, or 97 Astronomical Units (AU). For comparison, Pluto is 40 AU from the sun. \n\nThis places the new planet more or less in the Kuiper Belt, a dark realm beyond Neptune where thousands of small icy bodies orbit the sun. The planet appears to be typical of Kuiper Belt objects--only much bigger. Its sheer size in relation to the nine known planets means that it can only be classified as a planet itself
45656
Designated 2003 UB313 (it hasn’t been officially named yet), this “planet” is slightly larger than Pluto, has a small moon and takes more than 500 Earth years to orbit the Sun.\nA planet is a body large enough that, when it formed, it condensed under its own gravity to be shaped like a sphere. It orbits a star directly and is not a moon of another planet.\n To simplify things, some scientists propose that the size of Pluto be designated the smallest size for a planet. If that argument carries the day, we now have 10 planets, since 2003 UB313 meets all the criteria.
90524
I just picked this information up off a website... I found it using "Google"\nSEDNA: \nthe tenth planet in our solar system?\n\n \n Sedna, which was very recently discovered at the outer limits of our solar system, seems hardly any different from Pluto. It is a massive, spherical body that revolves around the Sun and may even have its own satellite. But does this really mean that Sedna is a planet?
908149
SUN SOLARIS.\n\nI can not answer the reason - sorry.
70938
The newest one is Sedna. It's not a planet though.
119949
solar=sun\nlunar=moon
987484
Since Aerosmiths' Big Ones CD is my all-time favorite - as in stranded on a desert isle with only 1 cd to listen to, that's what I would choose! - I love all those songs! To choose only one, tho,\nI would have to say Don't Want To Miss A Thing from that meteor movie. It's how I feel about my children, believe it or not - I love them so much & I don't want to miss a thing - can't believe they're in my life, I'm blown away by how amazing they are & that song sums it up very well.  Great question - thanks!!!!
921964
From the website taken among the other answers, I took this quasar with its 4 to 5 million - billions times brighter than the sun. If this light is the same as here around the sun, I consider that the total energy on a given sphere is a constant. But the energy density is directly related to the surface of the corresponding sphere. It growth to the second power of its radius. In other words, when the energy is 4 times the one of the sune, the earth has to be at 2 AU (300 000 000 km) from the sun to get the same light level. Having a 4 to 5 * 10^15 (million - billion) more light means 70 000 000 AU to get the same light level. Since 1 AU is 150 000 000 km, this means a 10^16 km away from the light source. This represents a 1000 light years of travel. The closest star, besides the sun, is a 4.5 light years.\nThat's bright !\n\nAnother source gives hypernovae as brightest. A value of 3 * 10^46 J is given as the same energy level as the universe (for two seconds). To have an analogous, it's necessary to go for the big bang theory. If we receive one joule per square meter and per day on earth from the sun, then the corresponding sphere for this flash is 5 millions light years big. That's brighter but damn short. Two seconds !\n\nI have a third candidate. It was much shorter and much brighter. The big band itself.
533473
STP rocks. I'm going to have to go with, the dark side of the moon has an earth but you can't really see it and the day after tomorrow is like either Thursday or Fridayish?
1107840
Because there are still arguments whether Pluto is actually a planet, "Sedna" is larger than Pluto. But I believe the argument stems from sheer distance from the Sun, it is more of a rogue body.
438002
Senda - smaller than pluto, not a planet.\n2003 UB313 - bigger than pluto, not a planet\n\nThere are lots of objects just like Pluto out there, but right now it is a "planet" and the others are not.  The IAU's Division of Planetary Science is currently working on the whole planet issue, and we are supposed to have some sort of resolution to this issue by august of this year.  It is actually quite a mess over at the IAU right now.\n\nAs far as the universe goes?  We have found almost 200 objects that we call planets, but they are orbiting other stars.
175236
Mercury is close to the sun. It is visible only when the sun is below the horizon. It is seen either before sun rise  or after sun set.\n Venus is the second closest to the sun and closest to earth. Some times it is seen as morning star and some times as evening star. Sme times it is seen 4 hours before sun rise and 4 hours after sun set
343521
like of buffalo wings or the sun?
334251
The sun is not a planet.
147445
Its all relative..usually we use sun as a point of a reference when we talk about relative size of planets which circle it. Pluto is about the same size as mercury.
120361
As the motto of The Planetary Geology Division of the Geological Society of America says, ""When one planet simply isn't enough."\n\nSo my vote would be for "planetary geology".  :)