Whats the form of government in the Czech Republic?
594823
Prime Minister and a Parliament.
679723
it has a democratic government based on the westminister system
97011
The people have the constitutional right to change the government by voting in local and national elections.\n\nIf you mean change the form of government, say from a Republic to a monarchy, for example, no, that isn't in there.
920020
First of all, the Czech Republic and Czechoslovakia are not the same thing - the former was only part of the latter; the two parts broke into separate countries in the early 1990s (I forget the exact year)\n\nAlso, the Soviet Union never "owned" Czechoslovakia, which remained a separate republic and government.  It did politically control it as a puppet state, however, from 1947 until 1988.  Before then in was independent for a couple of years after being occupied by the Nazis from 1938.
729670
Depend on the constitution and the deal between central government and the region! Forms include cantons, ..\nWe could also see it from the point of view of the USA and each state, the EU and each state, ... Germany, Switzerland, ... and their cantons, ...
100247
Göran Persson\nPrime Minister, Prime Minister's Office \n\nSweden's democratic system\nSweden is a parliamentary democracy, which means that all public power proceeds from the people. At the national level, the people are represented by the Riksdag which has legislative power. The Government implements the Riksdags decisions and draws up proposals for new laws or law amendments.
1100328
Government is a system of social control under which the right to make laws, and the right to enforce them, is vested in a particular group in society. \n\nGovernments are distinguished by whether power is held by one man, a few, or a majority. Today, it is common to distinguish between types of government on the basis of institutional organization and the degree of control exercised over the society.\n\nOrganizationally, governments may be classified into parliamentary or presidential systems, depending on the relationship between executive and legislature. Government may also be classified according to the distribution of power at different levels. \n\nThe basic law determining the form of government is called the constitution and may be written, as in the United States, or largely unwritten, as in Great Britain. Modern governments perform many functions besides the traditional ones of providing internal and external security, order, and justice; most are involved in providing welfare services, regulating the economy, and establishing educational systems. The extreme case of governmental regulation of every aspect of people's lives is totalitarianism.
1053131
Belgium.\n"as a result of the 1993 constitutional revision that furthered devolution into a federal state, there are now three levels of government (federal, regional, and linguistic community) with a complex division of responsibilities; this reality leaves six governments each with its own legislative assembly"
153494
It is a republic. It is governed by a representatives, not by the actually people (as in a democracy).
1110857
Czech.  I googled it for you :-)
455861
Both are federal states and both are republics, but in India, the president is a mere figurehead without any political power (like European monarchs). The executive branch of government in India is a cabinet led by the Prime Minister, but to govern the cabinet needs support from Parliament. While the US is a "presidential" style, the Indian system is thus a "parliamentarian" style of government. \n\nIndia has a multi-party system, while in the US, two parties are dominant (making it a 'two-party system'). The current Indian government is led by the Congress party but is dependent upon support from a range of smaller left-wing parties in parliament. The parliamentary system is fairly similar to that of the UK, the Westminster system, with two houses. In India, the lower house is elected by popular vote and this is from where the cabinet must have support. The upper house could be compared to the US Senate, with representatives from each state, but the election process is different. \n\nThe judiciary in India is independent and the Indian Supreme Court is on the one hand an arbitrer between the states, and the states versus the central government (as a constitutional court like the US Supreme Court), and also the last appellate court.
142419
absolute monarchy (rule by one monarch or dictator), constitutional monarchy (represenattive rpublic with a monarch serving as head of state) oligarchy (rule by the few or party rule),represenative republic (rule by the masses through elections for representatives), democratic republic (rule by the masses directly by referendum), anarchy (mob rule) Legislative Executive and Judicial are the branches of government not the forms of government. totalitarianism, communism, socialism etc all fall into the above categories as party rule in the case of communism or totalatarianism or democratic republic in the case of socialism.
166684
Democracy \nA system of government where the people rule.  \n\nRepresentative Democracy \nA democracy where the people elect representatives to rule for them.  \n\nConstitutional Monarchy \nA monarchy where the monarch is a figurehead. The country is ruled through elected Parliment Members. This monarchy also has a constitution.  \n\nMonarchy \nA system of government in which a king/queen/emperor etc. is the sole and absolute ruler. The right to rule was usually passed down to the eldest son, from the current monarch, when he/she died.  \n\nOligarchy \nA system of government in which a few people rule.  \n\nAristocracy \nA system of government in which a few people rule, usually the richest, and higher class. The right to rule was passed down within the family.  \n\nTyranny \nA system of government where a ruler has total power, not limited by a constitution or\nby other officials; especially one in ancient Greece. This ruler seizes power often by force, and rules single-handedly. In ancient Greece a tyrant often ruled fairly and justly and got important things done quickly. Many were very popular.  \n\nDictatorship \nA system of government in which one person has seized power violently, and is the sole ruler for life. (Or until he/she is overthrown).  \n\nTotalitarianism \nA system of government where every single part of an individual's life is controlled and watched by the government. People who support this kind of government, believe that strict order is the key to a society without chaos. Myanmar is run by a military government, often the case in a totalitarian government.  \n\nCommunism \nCommunism is a way of living in which the government owns and runs all the business. There are many forms of communism, the "ideal" form of society. Karl Marx set down the foundation of modern communism. Unfortunately all peaceful attempts to have a communist society have been abandoned early on. Usually the only way to have a communist region, is usually through revolution. These often have a cruel dictator, and are not "ideal." There are also many factions of communism, who usually fight each other. One example is Socialism.  \n\nAnarchy\nAnarchists believe that government is evil, and that it limits individual freedoms. So anarchy is no form of government at all. Its roots can be traced back to the Goths in Europe.
995920
Depends whter the country has a Presidential system or not. In a presidential system the Presidnt is eleced and is the head of state. In a non-presidential system the P.M is highest elected representative so the president or monarch is just a rubber stamp.
370292
chief of state: President Viktor A. YUSHCHENKO (since 23 January 2005) \nhead of government: Prime Minister Yuriy YEKHANUROV (since 22 September
120130
prague - czech republic
530125
COALITION GOVERNMENT:\nA coalition government, or coalition cabinet, is a cabinet in parliamentary government in which several parties cooperate. The usual reason for this arrangement is that no party on its own has a majority in the parliament. In times of crisis such as a war or a major economic or political crisis parties may form an all-party National Unity Government or Grand Coalition.\nCabinets based on a coalition with majority in the parliament ideally are more stable and longlived than minority cabinets. While the former are prone to internal struggles, they have less reason to fear votes of non confidence, although majority governments based on a single party are usually even more stable as long as its majority can be maintained.\nOPPOSITION:\n\nParliamentary opposition is a form of political opposition to a designated government, particularly in a Westminster-based parliamentary system. Note that this article uses the term government as it is used in Parliamentary systems, i.e. meaning the administration or the cabinet rather than the state.\n\nIn First Past the Post assemblies, where the tendency to gravitate into two major parties or party groupings operates strongly, government and opposition roles can go to the two main groupings serially in alternation. In this context, the opposition forms a recognized, even semi-official "government-in-waiting". Its "opposing" can degenerate into a charade pending the eventual exchange of roles and occupation, or reoccupation, of the Treasury benches.\nSelect Committees:\nA Select Committee is a committee made up of a small number of parliamentary members appointed to deal with particular areas or issues originating in the Westminster System of parliamentary democracy. Select Committees exist, obviously, in the British Parliament, as well as in other parliaments based on the Westminster model, such as those in Australia and New Zealand.\nmembers bill: Private Member's Bill is a proposed law introduced by a backbench member of parliament, whether from the government or the opposition side, to that legislature or parliament. In most parliaments within the Westminster System of parliamentary democracy, the overwhelming majority of Bills introduced are proposed by members of the Cabinet. However some parliamentary time is often set aside so that backbenchers may introduce Bills also. Note that a private member's bill should not be confused with a private bill; private member's bills are in fact public bills.\n\nIn reality, few backbench Private Member's Bills make it to enactment. In some cases, controversial measures that a government does not want to take responsibility for may be introduced by backbenchers, with the government secretly or openly backing the measure and ensuring its passage. They are sometimes known as "Government handout bills". The Abortion Act 1967 was enacted in the United Kingdom through this means, with the Bill itself was introduced by a Liberal Party Member of Parliament, David Steel; through the support from Home Secretary Roy Jenkins the Bill was given enough government time to allow a full debate.\n\nMMP government:\nMixed member proportional representation, also termed mixed-member proportional representation and commonly abbreviated to MMP, is a voting system used to elect representatives to numerous legislatures around the world. MMP is similar to other forms of proportional representation in that the overall total of party members in the elected body is intended to mirror the overall proportion of votes received; it differs by including a set of members elected by geographic constituency who are deducted from the party totals so as to maintain overall proportionality. In the United Kingdom, the form of MMP in use for several bodies is known as the additional member system (AMS), although the term additional member system can also be more broadly applied to include parallel voting, a non-proportional