who govern suez canal?
597213
Suez Canal Authority (SCA) - A state owned authority which owns & maintains the Suez Canal. It was set up by Egypt to replace the then privately nationalized company in 1950s which result in a Suez Crisis. With UN intervene, Egypt then agreed to pay millions of dollars to shareholders of the nationalized Suez Canal Company.
34260
Egypt \nIntroduction\n\nBackground: The regularity and richness of the annual Nile River flood, coupled with semi-isolation provided by deserts to the east and west, allowed for the development of one of the world's great civilizations. A unified kingdom arose circa 3200 B.C. and a series of dynasties ruled in Egypt for the next three millennia. The last native dynasty fell to the Persians in 341 B.C., who in turn were replaced by the Greeks, Romans, and Byzantines. It was the Arabs who introduced Islam and the Arabic language in the 7th century and who ruled for the next six centuries. A local military caste, the Mamluks took control about 1250 and continued to govern after the conquest of Egypt by the Ottoman Turks in 1517. Following the completion of the Suez Canal in 1869, Egypt became an important world transportation hub, but also fell heavily into debt. Ostensibly to protect its investments, Britain seized control of Egypt's government in 1882, but nominal allegiance to the Ottoman Empire continued until 1914. Partially independent from the UK in 1922, Egypt acquired full sovereignty following World War II. The completion of the Aswan High Dam in 1971 and the resultant Lake Nasser have altered the time-honored place of the Nile River in the agriculture and ecology of Egypt. A rapidly growing population (the largest in the Arab world), limited arable land, and dependence on the Nile all continue to overtax resources and stress society. The government has struggled to ready the economy for the new millennium through economic reform and massive investment in communications and physical infrastructure.
641369
This is really easy. Machievelli said the ends will justify the means and rulers should basically do anything to stay in power, ANYTHING.If you've read "The Prince," by Machievelli, you would understand this idea. Each of the people you have listed were pretty ruthless in their desire to stay on top. Just provide examples of this. Google each of their names to get a breif history of thier years as rulers. You will find plenty to support your claim. If you can't read the prince, get some sparks notes and find a few of his really good quotes.
114634
Puntland is a self-proclaimed state within Somalia.  I believe the president of Puntland is now General Mohamud Muse Hersi "Adde".
260459
This is because the UK and Italy and Germany are filthy rich greedy Western countries that avoid acting responsibly. They know about the mines, but they ignore them.\n\nThe above mentioned country's have coldhearted governments that don't care about Egyptians.\n\nEgypt must call on the International Community to FORCE those countries to send special teams to clean the filth they left on Egyptian Soveirgn Soil.\n\nBloody Arrogant Western Governments!\n\nHow would they feel if the tables were turned?\n\nThey're so bloody arrogant!
1170755
The handover\n \nThe Miraflores Locks are seen here in modern times, as a ship enters the locks from Miraflores Lake, on the last stage of her journey to the Pacific Ocean.The invasion effectively ended military control over Panama. President Mireya Moscoso took office on September 1, 1999 and was Panama's first woman in the job. The treaty came into force on 31 December 1999, and since that date the canal has been run by the Panama Canal Authority.\n\nThe handover was highly controversial in the U.S., and its passage was difficult. The controversy was largely caused by contracts to manage two ports at either end of the canal, which Panama awarded to a Hong Kong-based conglomerate, Hutchison Whampoa. Some contend that the company has close ties to the Chinese government and the Chinese military.[24] However, the U.S. State Department says it has found no evidence of connections between Hutchison Whampoa and Beijing.[25] Some Americans were also wary of placing this strategic waterway under the protection of the Panamanian security force.[26]
455004
Was Jimmy Carter the President who gave away the Panama Canal?\n\nYes!
605868
I am a full blooded honky from the USA and I would love to visit Egypt.  I know their politics failed in the six day war between them and Israel in 1967, but I think they have a more compentent lead now.  I love Egypt!
929450
chief of state: Paramount Ruler Tuanku SYED SIRAJUDDIN ibni Almarhum Tuanku Syed Putra Jamalullail, the Raja of Perlis (since 12 December 2001)\nhead of government: Prime Minister ABDULLAH bin Ahmad Badawi (since 31 October 2003); Deputy Prime Minister Mohamed NAJIB bin Abdul Razak (since 7 January 2004)
258301
The Egyption. see source
259312
So no one ruling body has total control.
760022
Constitutional Monarchy that is also a Parliamentary Democracy and a Federation.\nFrom the CIA World Factbook\nhttps://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ca.html
639309
absolutely.  for example, egypt.  they haven't had a native egyptian ruling them for millenia.  all because pharoah wouldn't let the isrealites go.
838891
The Government sets regulations.
90551
A government of the people, by the people, for the people.
784760
its a Constitutional monarchy\n\nthe queen owns it all and is the supreme power, but Parliament run and administer the country.\n\nthe powers she is suppose to have can't ever really be used, she's more of a big walking advertisement for the UK - but...she's the head of some parts of the army, all the navy and all the air force...so she could...in theory. do what the king of Thailand did a while back...if needs be.
686626
Egypt (national democratic party)\nSyria (Baath Party).