Relevants of UN with special reference to Iraq & Iran crises?
610754
i cant see UN play any role in iraq or iran crisis\nas u can see,in iraq war UN already said that there is no way that iraq have nuclear bomb but as u can see the war is still keep going and what UN can do about it?the american also cant find any nuclear bomb?so,is UN just a tool for american international cover up?u tell me\nin iran war,UN already state that iran didnt abuse any international law of nuclear power but the american still hesitate of it?\nnow u tell me is UN play its role as world united power?
415228
Also try: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_nations
402373
I just spoke with a friend who's preparing to go to Iraq for the military.  Now he's not sure where exactly he'll be headed (Iraq or Iran).  But he and I agree that it is best to address the Iran issue BEFORE it becomes a PROBLEM.  It's easier to fix now than later.
221667
United Nations Organisation
131205
You're really jumping to incorrect conclusions here.  Iran is being placed in front of the UN Security Council because of their desired nuclear program.  They were put in front of the Security Council by 27 countries (only 1 of which is the US).  The US has had no direct diplomatic ties to Iran since 1979 when they took the US Embassy.  Because of this, the US has actually had nothing directly to do with this issue, only indirectly thru the EU3.  Since 2 of the EU3 holds the US in pretty low regards how can you even think that the US has had ANY influence on the proceedings at all to date.
687210
Bush can.t deal with Iraq the way it is His crying wolf about Iran is only a ploy to draw attention away from Iraq Just as Iraq was used to draw attention away from the unfinished job in Afghanistan
404471
Oh yeah, Iraq is working out so well.  Iran, with a laregr populice that actually supports its government, would work out even better.\n\n(Incidentally, I think the idea of trying to convince Iran that it doesn't need nuclear weapons by threatening to drop nuclear weapons on it, as the Bush administration floated over the weekend, is brilliant psychology.)
628255
NO.They will take action against them through the UNO.I believe there will be no direct attack on Iran like the attack on Iraq.
957367
Many resons, the UN security council stated they had WMD. Iraq is a stratigic point in controlling the middle east. It keeps the fight off American soil to keep the civiilian causalities down.
906493
Unfortunately, Iraq will be united with Iran. Shiites are the majority in Iraq. If there is a democratic government elected by the majority, it will be Shiite. Shiites run Iran. Iran is a shiite nation. No bashing, but Bush has created an impossible situation. Bush is right about Iran being the axis of evil. So what the hell do we do now? Please. We must not ask Iran for help in Iraq. Oh, by the way, in Democracy, you do not kill the people who disagree with you. The so called Iraq government is a puppet regime.
1085198
Aren't there Australian consulates or embassies in Iraq? I know there were before the Gulf War, not really sure what the situation is like now.\n\nIf the situation is that bad, you can try contacting any Western embassy to see if they might provide asylum. The EU has a standing policy on asylum-seekers, so you might have luck if you contact any of their consulates.
1137397
In a very real sense, the U.N. is responsible for the United States having to go to war with Iraq.\n\nFrance, Germany, and Russia were getting bribed by Saddam Hussein though big payments siphoned from the Oil For Food program.  This is why these three countries were so against going to war.  They didn't want the cash flow to stop.\n\nSo, once again the UN Screwed us!\n\nSince you're interested in this topic, buy Eric Shawn's new book, The U.N. Exposed
104212
TRY THIS LINK\nhttp://www.un.org/
326020
The coalition of the willing (36 countries with boots on the ground and 78 countries offering logistic support) that went in to Iraq, went in under UN charter and 14 different resolutions from the 90 cease fire agreement. Nato is currently involved in helping train Iraqi troops and police.\nCanada is doing a very good job helping us in the war against terrorism with their troops that are deployed in Afghanistan. The UN peace keepers seem to have their hands full in Africa, the Ivory coast and Haiti, along with other locations.
627255
HELL NO!  America is tending to interfere in other countrys matters far too much. They should realise by now that the second world war ended in 1945 with the unification of italy. The two super powers were usa and Russia. Russia got over it that times change but its just that usa is still stuck on the whole "super power of the world" thing. What happens in iraq and the middle east is their concern and they will sort it out their way usa has no right to interfere. usa has oil reserves that it can use but it wants to use the oil in the middle east that belongs to them but then kinda mysteriously got under iraq. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
128918
I would argue that we are already at war with Iran. Iran is the major reason for the fighting in Iraq today. Iran has a great interest in seeing that Iraq is not stabilized and we continue to concentrate our efforts there. With Afghanistan being relatively stable, a stable Iraq means that attention will be focused elsewhere. Like Iran and their nuclear program (which the United Nations has condemned and passed resolutions that Iran must stop it). If Iran has stable democracies with American soldiers in them to their east and to their west, they'd be mighty nervous.
1020396
It's too late for that.  We've got our fingers in too much of the world for us to pull out now, and everything and anything we do is scrutinized and criticized by the world.  Think about it, we went into Iraq, and the UN said we should have worked through them.  Well, now we are at odds with Iran over their nuclear ambitions, and are trying to work it out through the UN, and they say we should work it out directly with Iran.  We're criticized for giving aid to Israel, and criticized for not giving aid to other countries.  We were criticized for going into Somalia, and criticized for not acting on Rwanda.  We cannot win in international opinion, and we cannot pull out.  Truly, the only thing we can do is look after our own national interests, and take the international community with a grain of salt.