What economic challenges does poland face to adopt the euro?
597989
poland does not face as many economic challenges as the wealthier countries such as Britain and Germany, because their currency is not worth a great deal, so it would not have to be devalued to meet the requirements of the Euro. They also gain from the fact that they are able to go and live anywhere else in Europe much more easily now and get a well paid job wich they cannot in Poland. The only challenge that they will face, is that the Euro will push up the price of most of their day to day shopping goods. They will also receive enormous subsidies from the rest of Europe.
1074600
You will have to take your case to Poland
1134425
There are not any. Europe is a group of nations which have grouped together to form a union, hence the term E.U. Industries are nationalised within each country or member state, and belong to that memebr state, not to the E.U directly. For this to happen the E.U would have to become a super state with a president/leader. Fortunately (I am a nationalist) this ideology was stopped when France and other member states voted against the European Constitution a couple of years ago.
858263
I'm not bothered either way really. It's about even.\n\nThe main argument for not joining is that the UK loses control of its own interest rates, about the only 'lever' that the government has to control the economy.\n\nAn interest rate set to suit the whole EU might not suit the UK. At the moment, unemployment rates are low. The government needs to consider how they would pull out of another early-80s style unemployment crisis. Dropping interest rates might be the only way to stimulate business. If the EU doesn't let you do that, you can get 'stag-flation', a combination of stagnation (lack of economic growth) and inflation, which  France and Germany haven't fully got out of.\n\nYou can't stimulate business any more using government subsidies, because they aren't allowed by the EU or the WTO (World Trade Organisation).\n\nInterest rates obviously have a strong effect on house prices and also affect business profitability and whether international companies see more or less profit from setting up in the UK or somewhere else.\n\nIts all a question of the supply and demand for money, as far as borrowers are concerned. When it comes to mortgages and things, higher interest rates means less demand for loans, but a higher cost if you do actually take one out.\n\nArguments in favour of joining the euro are that there would be no more foreign exchange transaction fees, both for businesses and when you jet off to Spain, accountancy would be simpler for multi-national firms and for firms that import/export goods or services to/from the present EU zone.
516790
No and i will explain why. When they join the EU the whole economies will collapse. EU is nothing but trouble
702112
A good question (but perhaps better off in the economics area of the site). Every pound or euro note you hold has been printed and spent by the state (before you receive it from your bank or employer or client), and on the day it was printed, the total number of pound notes in the country changed slightly.\n\n  This is the issue we are discussing here: how much money can a country print before it causes disaster?\n\n    The answer is that generally a country may print or create a small amount of cash on top of the notes it takes out of circulation, but while deciding how much to print, it must take a very careful look at recent inflation and exchange rate statistics.\n\n   If a country prints too much money, both the inflation and the exchange rates will go haywire / will be adversely affected. This is because, as money becomes more abundant but the things you buy with money do not, the ratio of people wanting to buy stuff and people selling stuff changes. \n\n  Simply put, if a country doubles the amount of money in circulation, then market forces will automatically take down the value of the exchange rate at least by half, prices of all goods and services will go up (will double), and imports become harder to afford as it now takes at least twice as much money to but the same imported goods.\n\n   Why is this not the case for the USA (and the Eurozone)? It is sometimes and to an extent (for the above reasons), but:\n when much of the extra money that is added into circulation does not get spent and then spent again by the person who received it, and again ..., instead the money is stockpiled somewhere (by a person, a company or a government), then the above affect does not take place until the stockpiled money is spent again. \n\nAnd if the total amount of money in the world being stockpiled (most large stockpiles are in dollars and euros as there are used for international trade and to keep other currencies stable) goes up, so (to conclude in the correct jargon) non-inflationary increases in money supply are possible.
118204
Nothing\n\nThe Euro is now the currency of Spain\n\nIt would have been worth $7.17\n\nIt is no longer accepted for changing at commercial banks. There is a very faint chance that the central Spanish bank in Madrid  may still change it for Euros.
151638
The best way is Google or Yahoo Search. I recommend http://www.franchising.info.pl - Polish website
603725
THREAT TO LOCAL SMALL SCALE INDUSTRY AND EVEN BIG UNITS\nMORE FOREIGN EXCHANGE OUTGO IF PEOPLE LOVE FOREIGN GOODS\nTHREAT TO CULTIVATION AND UN REMUNERATIVE PRICES AND THE GENERIC SEEDS MAY NOT SPROUT AT ALL\nLOSS OF JOBS AND UNEMPLOYMENT\nDICTATION DOMINATION BY THE GLOBAL PLAYERS AND COMPLETE CHAOS AND EXTINCTION OF DEMOCRACY AND ELECTED GOVT
1092359
England refuses to adopt Euro coz its Currency Value is Higher than that of Euro
1055622
There are both political and financial reason for not doing it.\n\nWhilst the existing member states are ignoring their obligations to the stability pact rules, why should we prop up their currency?
1034641
Its good for the eastern european countries because they will inevitibly profit from the deal because the lower cost of doing business there should attract industry and jobs and theoretically open their agricultrual markets.  But bad because they will never have the respect of western europe and will always be treated like the figurative step-children of the EU.\n\nThe EU will eventually collapse because the founding members will not reap the benefits of membership they envisioned at the onset.  The only reason they have grown so quickly is europe is trying to unite under one currency to be larger than the US, but since each country has its own separate economy the two can't really be compared.   The Brits see this which is why the UK has retained its own currency, so when the euro fails along with the EU they will have the strongest currency in Europe.
480909
The answer is nothing ! Zero! Thats because there is the Euro now in Europe!
916515
You have to ask the Poles- neither of them speaks English
179435
I am personally a bit scared because with the full free movement of goods, it will be even easier for other countries industries to relocate there. But in general I see Romania joining EU a positive thing
59212
Simply, because the economically condition is different from one country to another. So is the political condition. Those two elements are playing the greatest role in making the currency rates varied.
753297
In simple terms there are 3 competing blocks of economic powers.\n\nThe US, Canada and Latin America who are linked to the Dollar\nThe EU block (UK, France, Germany) who are linked to the Euro\nThe Tiger Economies (Japan, Asia, Australia) who are linked to the Yen.\n\nAnything which weakens one block, such as a new poor member joining, strengthens the other blocks as the original block needs to spend money bringing their new member up to their standard of living. \n\nWhen East Germany was re-united with the much richer West Germany, the tax-payers within West Germany and the EU had to fork out hefty tax rises to cover the cost. This resulted in a fall in the Euro v's the Dollar/Yen meaning people in those 2 blocks benefited.\n\nIf Turkey joins the EU it will require even more financing than East Germany to raise the standard of living.\n\nIf Mexico were to join the USA it would cause a financial hemorrhage within the US and benefit the EU nations.\n\nThe other advantage to the US of Turkey joining the EU is that it might make Turkey less "Islamic" and more Westernized, leading to other Islamic nations seeking membership too.\n\nIf Islamic countries become more Westernized it will make the Middle East more safer in terms of less Anti-Americanism from the Arab nations.\n\nThere are more complex factors involved, but the above is the basics.