What are the differences between problem “Cause and Effect”?
594296
well, simply to say, cause is the action made n effect is the outcome or result incurred from the action.\n\nexample: if u kill a chicken (that is the cause/action) then one day u will be killed by somebody (that is the effect/result)\n\nget it??
409355
the effects that it caused.
399303
It is the revenue generated by the change you are contemplating (the problem).\nCount only the revenue which will occur because of that change.
551973
TO CAUSE THE CHANGE CHEMICAL REACTION
901923
The "variables" are the things in the experiment you are testing.  If you wanted to see if the rate of polar bear births increased when the sale of ice cream increased in Georgia (btw, it does), then the variables would be polar bear births and ice cream sales in Georgia.\n\nYou should note that just because the values of your variables change, does not mean that a cause and effect relationship exists.  As in the example above, just because more polar bears are born in years where ice cream sales in Georgia are high, does not mean that Georgia can make polar bears have more babies just by buying more ice cream.
1154290
climate change is a natural effect. Global Warming is caused by man.
1171251
confounding variables are outside things that can effect results. example: examining the relationship between fish growth and food, salinity, and temperature all in the same tank. can't tell what's making the fish grow, can ya?\n\nexperiments reduce variability by controlling the environment more thoroughly.\ntake a statistics class, that helps with bio
1150209
In our FINITE minds, we only can comprehend that everything is an effect, and has a cause.\n\nWe can not comprehend that there is a cause... but nothing caused the cause.\n\n.. ouch... my brain can't handle this!! :)
496089
Adding a negative is the same as subtracting a positive.  Subtracting a negative is the same as adding a positive.
1106835
They are both equal depending on your approach and comprehension.  Scientifically, every thing is based on cause and effect, thus matter is not eternal nor perfect b/c it must have a beginning.  If it was perfect/eternal, then it would not change but it does.  Thus an Originator is required into the equation of existence.  I just added this 2nd part b/c I thought it may be interesting for you.
612421
Every effect has a cause is one of the scentral guiding principles of Science. In physics, local causality refers to the effect demonstrated in the immediate neighourhood of the causing force
544075
Wonderful question!!!\nBy definition, a problem is any stimulus, question, task, phenomenon, or discrepancy, the explanation for\nwhich is not immediately known. Thus, we are interested in focusing on student performance under those\nchallenging conditions that demand strategic reasoning, insightfulness, perseverance, creativity, and\ncraftsmanship to resolve a complex problem. Not only are we interested in how many answers students\nknow, but also in knowing how to behave when they DON'T know. Habits of Mind are performed in response\nto those questions and problems the answers to which are NOT immediately known. We are interested in\nobserving how students produce knowledge rather than how they merely reproduce knowledge. The critical\nattribute of intelligent human beings is not only having information, but also knowing how to act on it.\nA "Habit of Mind” means having a disposition toward behaving intelligently when confronted with problems,\nthe answers to which are not immediately known. When humans experience dichotomies, are confused by\ndilemmas, or come face to face with uncertainties--our most effective actions require drawing forth certain\npatterns of intellectual behavior. When we draw upon these intellectual resources, the results that are\nproduced through are more powerful, of higher quality and greater significance than if we fail to employ those\npatterns of intellectual behaviors.\nEmploying "Habits of Mind" requires a composite of many skills, attitudes cues, past experiences and\nproclivities. It means that we value one pattern of thinking over another and therefore it implies choice\nmaking about which pattern should be employed at this time. It includes sensitivity to the contextual cues\nin a situation which signal this as an appropriate time and circumstance in which the employment of this\npattern would be useful. It requires a level of skillfulness to employ and carry through the behaviors\neffectively over time. It suggests that as a result of each experience in which these behaviors were\nemployed, the effects of their use are reflected upon, evaluated, modified and carried forth to future\napplications\nHABITS OF MIND ATTEND TO: .\n·  Value: Choosing to employ a pattern of intellectual behaviors rather than other, less\nproductive patterns.\n·  Inclination: Feeling the tendency toward employing a pattern of intellectual behaviors.\n·  Sensitivity: Perceiving opportunities for, and appropriateness of employing the pattern of\nbehavior.\n·  Capability: Possessing the basic skills and capacities to carry through with the behaviors.\n·  Commitment: Constantly striving to reflect on and improve performance of the pattern of\nintellectual behavior.
750132
The major differences are two concepts: 1 Wave mechanics.\n2. Probability, that is , uncertainty.
857324
In a controlled experiment, you control the variables and thus, you affect the outcome. In an observational study, you don't touch anything and you don't affect the outcome.
758839
"caused." \n\nUnfortunately I have no idea what the rest of it means.  :P
512136
Three types of approaches are, however, especially important. First, there\nare approaches that start out from the general notion of a law of nature, then define the ideas of necessary and sufficient nomological conditions, and, finally, employ the latter concepts to explain what it is for one state of affairs to cause another . Second, there are approaches that employ subjunctive conditionals in an attempt to give a counterfactual analysis of causation. Third, there are probabilistic approaches, where the central idea is that a cause must, in some way, make its effect more like Each of these three types of approaches faces difficulties specific to it. The attempt to analyze causation in terms of nomological conditions, for example, is hard pressed to provide any account of the direction of causation—a problem that quickly becomes evident when one notices that one state of affairs may be a nomologically sufficient condition for another either because the former is causally sufficient for the latter, or because, on the contrary, the latter is causally necessary for the former. In the case of counterfactual approaches to causation, a crucial problem is that traditional analyses of subjunctive conditionals employ causal notions. Alternative accounts have been proposed, involving similarity relations over possible worlds. But these alternative accounts are exposed to decisive objections. Finally, there are also specific problems for probabilistic accounts, two of which are especially important. First, probabilistic accounts have struggled to find an interpretation of their central claim—that causes must, in some way, make their effects more likely—that is not open to counterexamples. Second, probabilistic approaches to causation typically involve the very counterintuitive consequence that a completely deterministic world could not contain any causally related events.
832630
Look for connections: causes and effects.\n\nGOOD Question!