In all its history, which are the countries that have attacked Canada?
599356
Good Question, I am not an athority on Canadan History but to answer your question I need to know a few things?\n\nWhen does it start being Canada and stop being a british taritory?  The United States fought British Troops in both attempts to attack northword (I am sure some of the troops may have considerd themselves to be Canadan)\n\nyou said "attacked Canada"  Do you include the Germans attacking Canadan units in france in WW1 and WW2?  The 3rd Canadain Infatry Divison stormed Juno Beach in Normandy on D-Day.\n\nBut if you only mean the mainland than I have no new information to add.
1161031
The only good thing about Canada is that it's connected to the USA.\nIf it wasn't for us protecting your azzes, you would have been Hitler's Bitchez.
740269
Politically: Canada.\n\nA respected and trustworthy nation, Canada has many friends that they could call to aid us, or at least help sway global opinion. Large landmass also would allow us to house troops or bases if need be in the area.\n\nMilitarily: Australia\n\nWith a bigger, stronger, smarter army, and a loyal friend of America, Australia would be able to pump alot of money and troops into a world scale campaign.
650230
Canada has been with the US in Afghanistan from the start.\nHere is a chronology:\nhttp://www.cbc.ca/news/background/afghanistan/timeline.html\n\nI suspect some people who comment on the news, like President Bush, don't actually read the news.  I have noticed articles about Canadian troops all along.
634233
Zimbabwe, North Korea, Belarus, Cuba, Iran,...\n\nhttp://www.arthuredelstein.org/worlddictators/\n\nItaly has been a democratic republic since June 2, 1946.
984924
Honestly i think Canada is one of the most peaceful Countries..you havent heard them on the news lately about starting a war or whatever have u ..u hardly hear them on the news because of bad things lol
317250
I'm not sure why you think that Canada is "more respected."\nBy whom? I'm an American living in Europe and I learned in the many years here that all they do is compare themselves to the U.S. They criticized the Irak war, but it was a matter of them not having money for their armed forces. Of course they are very loud at criticizing, but they depend on the U.S.A. for their defense. At this time they see no direct risks (Cold War is over), so they play the important ones. \nWhat has me wondering all the time is that a country like Canada still embraces MONARCHY!!! I think this is extremely ridiculous.
1078633
I'm unaware that Bush has ever attacked a country without a reason. The only countries America has ever fought with during the Bush administration were Iraq and Afhganistan, in which we had many reasons to be there. What are you talking about? Are you stoned?
712285
Which country? Which fight?\n\nPeace.
127757
Canada... They're defenseless... And they have delicious bacon!!!
241706
would canada count?\n\nwas a colony at one time
38756
Why do you say "our" enemy without explaining who you are? I assume it is because you are American and since America is the centre of the world, you don't need to state the obvious. I assume you think I just spelled "centre" wrong because it should be "center" because that's how American's spell it.\n\nMy point is, criticism of the US by Canadians and others is because of the arrogance of Americans and your tendency to impose your will around the world.\n\nCanadians have most things in common with Americans. (But not banks as someone else said in their answer.) We are not becomming your enemies. But Canada and US are supposed to be partners in the North America Free Trade Association. A dispute arose over soft wood lumber. The dispute was settled by an indepenedent tribunal but the US refuses to accept the decision. Free trade has been great for both countries but America's refusal to play by the rules has two results. One, it has cost Canada billions of dollars. Two, it has lead to increased criticism of American arrogance, whether it be on this issue or any of the other ways the US acts like a bully.  \n\nIt's not true that Canada is becoming your enemy, but if it were, it ought to tell you something about how pooly to treat your friends. After all, you don't have many in the world. If you start to worry about losing your few remaining friends, with whom you have so much in common, maybe you need to consider that you may be doing something wrong yourselves.\n\nWe in Canada need to improve as well. For too long we've been taking advantage of the US and not pulling our weight militarily. With the election of a Conservative government on Monday we will be taking a step to correct this.
1148371
Um I think either North Korea or Iran might spark ww3. China & Russia would back them cuz they are communist or somehow allied or have common interests. I think on the side of the US, would be the UK, EU, Japan, & Austrailia. This is the big shocker though. The hidden communists in Canada would sieze power & use Canada as a staging ground to attack the US & UK. Most of ww3 would be fought in Canada or something along those lines with slight variations in the outcome depending on how it all unfolded.
703504
LEMME THINK ABOUT THIS...... probably the hockey game because we wouldnt have a chance against a country invading us. lol jk GO CANADA
180243
I believe Canada is a part of NATO and NATO is in Afghanistan at the moment. Plus the Canadians are a good professional force. They need to do their part.
760357
Canada will not defend you with military force.  And Canada has a mutual legal assistance treaty with Poland allowing for extradition if the alleged crime would be a crime under Canadian law.\n\nhttp://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/intpolicing/centralauth_e.htm\n\nSorry.
195252
Howdy\n\nThis is an interesting problem.\n\nIt depends firstly as to why any terrorist group would wish to attack Canada, they are widely regarded as the worlds best peace keepers, not to mention that the current canadian are careful to keep a neutral stance in their foreign policy. \n\nIf you could identify a reason for attack, why not attack the United States which is at present the "Great Satan" rather than spending time and resources on attacking a nation when it hasn't been identified as the main threat.\n\nAny biological attack does not follow borders or legal conventions, this means that an attack of this type would most likely end up all over the northern contient depending on the viral agent and its delivery method.\n\nAs for your suggested delivery methods, rodents have in the past been the transport method for a viral agent such as the more famous "Black Death". Birds have transmitted dieases such as SARS which as spead accross the world from china to europe. \n\nI can't be sure of the delivery options which the militaries of the world have tested, but you can be sure that they have been looked into. Although I would have to say that the threat in my opinion comes from waterbourne agents rather than infecting thousands and thousands of mice and rats. \n\nI would have to say that the threat is low to nil in this case.\n\nHope it helps\n- Phil