If women ran the Pentagon, would missiles and submarines be shaped differently?
602385
how can a submarine glide through the water shaped like a disc, perhaps, without being detected or try escaping an enemy submarine shaped like a sphere?\n\nit has nothing to do with your penis extension. it's just is.\n\ni tried answering your question, as seriously as i can. but i'd rather not and just give me my two points.
369059
Matter a fact I am pretty sure the U.S.Navy has an installation there anyway. Mass could fight back! There are several submarines at port there.
434657
taht depends on the women:>
1035292
Acutally the military is better for many women than civilian life. The training and advancement oppertunities are the best they have ever been for females. There are restrictions on serving in Special Forces, Submarines, and most ground Combat units. But they are females on most ships, flying planes, and holding command ranks through out the world. How many Fortune 500 firms can say that???
619588
NO!...Go ahead  I'll take the heat..call me a chauvanist if you choose.  I was in the Marine Corps in combat...I just would never want to see a woman there.  I can't justify it.  I have a daughter in the Air Force (medic) and I'm very proud of her...but infantry...absolutely not.\nThere is only one really practical reason I can offer for not allowing women in the combat mos's.  While I know that women can demonstrate significant levels of physical fitness I don't believe they have the upper body strength and size to engage in combat against men.  I believe that for them to train side by side with men would cause standards of training for men to be lowered.  Only those who have trained for infantry can appreciate this.
281050
the only rate they cannot be is FT.  Any submarine NEC they cannot have, nor can they be a SEaL, but they can be any of the source rates for SEaL or Sub forces.  The closest equivalent to FT is FC(Same job, just FT is subs only)\n\nHowever, opportunities are limited for females, due to logistics. For instance, there are only a set number of HMs available, as a large percentage of them serve with the Marines in combat..no females allowed there.  Additionally, there is only so much room aboard surface vessels to berth females
440667
When women take over the would finaly they won't be all the cr** men created
210163
There were very few women in combat zones (Allied women, at least) and those who were there were primarily nurses.  The services did use women for a few other funtions.  One was for the women to fly the aircraft from the States to points of embarkation where they were loaded on ships.  Stateside, women took over men's jobs in building the war material.  "Rosy the Riveter" was actually many thousand women.  When the war ended these women lost their jobs and men took them once again.
315230
If women were running things, there would be little or no war. Women are nurturing creatures and some are very senstive, so they wouldn't want anyone to die.
853960
Yes, but if you change the head shape a little bit to heart and eyes to a bit rounder it would be more like a female, but do not be offended i am just suggesting. Looks don't matter, but your heart does.
76148
Yes.\nShould any and all women be allowed?  No.\nFor example, women pilots tend to have slightly faster reflexes.  I have no problems with women flying into a war zone and then flying out.  The same could be said for tank crews and naval craft.\nInfantry?  This is a different matter.  If the woman can drag a wounded buddy out of fire, then why not.  But then again I think that the standards for both men and women in combat should be higher.  I say if a male cannot drag a wounded buddy, he should not be there either.
879877
Absolutely! Why do you think they make sportscars shaped as they are? They're trying to replicate female curvature.\n\nI was watching a documentary on architecture a long time ago, and a Japanese bridgemaker said something very similar - he said he liked using curvature in his bridges associated with women.\n\nPeople see it as a sleek and attractive.
52204
I dont think so. Their beauty comes with the whole package. They would definitely look different when they are taller. Pretty? That remains to be seen. Personally, I think petite ladies are more feminine and thus could look prettier to others.
478102
Yes i would, it's about time, we had some really smart lady in charge. \nFor one on the most advanced nations on earth, we are one of the few democracies that have never had a woman leader.\nMaybe the time has come at last.
899927
So long as you penis is as long as an intercontinental balistic missile you shouldn't have any problems although there may be a risk of going sterile through the radiation.  Oh and the only women you'll be able to have will need to be some serious heffer bucket women about the size of the statue of liberty and probably won't be considered a catch.
798662
They wouldn't roll very far if they were any other shape now would they?
1120738
Depends on the womans age