why cant we have a world system where help can be given to all needing nations; through a knowing and sharing.
605851
It would make the world a better place to live, and people would be happier
1067407
Of course it could.  However I don't think that will ever happen.  War is too convenient.  War is a remarkable catalyst for redistribution of funds.  A select  few in the grand scheme benefit.  War does not help the starving children.  It does however help the munition mfg. and makers of war  implements. War helps lobbyist  and the organizations they lobby for.  It also helps  political enities  who are not above a little ill gotten gold.
1052049
Without communication it would be impossible to develop a country.  You need to know what the needs of the people are and develop accordingly as there is no single formula for development - don't let anyone tell you otherwise.
817921
I'd like to think we could agree upon giving help to those that are less fortunate. It seems that all people have this in common.
294128
With today's technology and demographic implosion,  the world has become a smaller place. We have a clash with other civilizations not understanding different cultures. Each culture differs in customs, traditions, behavior, religion and language. The idea that the Western culture wants to impose a Universal State in the world is impossible and not even war can make it happen. We are headed towards major destruction, not total, but something very drastic.
1018255
We would have to help each other out a lot more.  We'd also be more careful with what we had.
1059763
I don't think it is advisable nor feasible that one leader over the entire world would be a good idea. While perhaps someone to regulate the sovereign countries may seem smart in all essence you have to remember the human factor. Once you give someone that much power it becomes harder and harder to regulate them and keep corruption out of the top ranking offices. Capitalism started out helping America, but has quickly turned fascist, because the human factor was left out of the equation. A single person in charge of the world I fear would be inviting trouble. While I wouldn't even recommend a committee to be in charge of the entire world it makes more sense than one person.
599482
Yes, It is possible to someday have a "New World Order."  I mean this in the most positive way.  It will take time and some revolutionary type of thinking however.  I have traveled all over the world and I have found that we have more in common with people of the world than we have differences.  People want the same things--good health, happiness, economic opportunity, to raise a family, hope and just governance.  We are closer than many will lead us to believe. It will begin with a vision of common grounds regarding shared values and the continuous denouncing of evil and evil rhetoric.  Certainly, there is going to be hatred and contempt, but we cannot let a small minority of "Terrorists" threaten our very existence.  People are basically good and will choice good over evil once their primal needs are satisfied.  The problem with a world society is one of fairness to all people and sectors of the world.  This becomes a major obstacle to world peace and is probably the one thing that can prevent the evolution of governance to that level.  That notwithstanding--doesn't it sound a lot better to visualize world peace than to live in a world full of hatred and violence?  And a world in which we are united against those who create chaos.  I could envision a day when we are governed by a board of our peers that are responsible for ensuring just and competent governance.
502286
USA should stop helping everyone around the globe and help their own! You should help someone who will help their selves. I feel like for some unfortunate reason a person may become homeless or not have food. I believe we should help them get on their feet, but the ultimate goal is they go to work and make it on their own. If they are disabled or to old to work then extend the help!
172411
You can't help somebody who doesn't want help. "ask and you shall be given" It is one's own obligation to become what one wants to become. Probably helping is not the right word, I would go more for not obstructing them more. Plus there are individuals in 3rd world countries that live like in 1st world countries and people in 1st world countries that live like 3rd world countries so I guess nowadays it's not about 1st world or 3rd world, it's about individuals in one world. What I do believe is that the strong should help the weak but to a physical extent only.
832286
Good question. Thank you. I could think of a hundred things, but let me just share a little. In my hope I see a time when we, meaning the great collective "we" of humanity, would no longer find a need to be afraid of one another any more. A world without the fear of the Other, but instead, a recognition that we are all related, all a single family. We would do what all families do, only on a global scale. We would care for those who were old or sick or in need. And we would be busy working to help one another grow. We would reach out into the Universe around us while we protected and nurtured this fragile island home, Earth.
146249
If you don't mind my asking -- what is the reason for this question.  We do empathize with the plight of developing countries, however it's not the responsibility of the west to take care of everyone that asks for help.  When westerners give aid to some countries (not all), graft and corruption steals this aid and the aid does not get to those that need it.  This is a waste of our money, something that we dont feel we want to do.\n\nWe are sympathetic to the needs of those that are less fortunate, but when we DO but into the business of others we tend to get slammed by the international media.
256711
to help people in what ever way you can ,we are all human and need help in one way ore another. seeing people suffer or lonely makes me wish I could do something to ease their lives
409261
Because everyone can suffer, even the Chosen people.\n\nDivinity does not bring suffering, humanity does.
213278
Its a matter of preception. If you believe that this country is responsible for the welfare of its citizens then yes. If you believe that everyone can help themselves, then no
996238
i always that the wordl needed a war counrtry.  that way, we could just go there and fight and not wreck houses and stuff.....................  i suggested part of Africa as its big and theres a lot of suffering going on there........we could buy part of it and help out the people at the same time.
1181261
I think the issue of the homeless and the hungry is more a local issue than a national, after-all, who should be more moved to compassion, the guy sitting in Washington, or the neighbor who sees the person on the street.  As far as helping other countries, there is the moral issue, we are not on this planet alone and we do have a responsibility to the rest of the world.  But we have to see the practical side also, people who are desperate do desperate things.  Terrorism is as much battled by humanitarian efforts as it is by war.