Why do LIBERALS think capturing OBL would solve anything?  Do they think the war on terror would end?
595776
Clinton was handed bin laden when he was in office ; but "refused". The Liberals really grasp at anything they can to criticize President Bush , because it's like you say:"They can't win elections".Instead of standing for anything or trying to help the country-they look at the worst in anything, and then they run with that "doom & gloom" football.It's like they can't handle it when nothing is "wrong", because how are they going to convince the population what "loosers" they are with out them ..
215456
Ok, look:\n\n There is no reason why George W Bush should be "booted." He is protecting this country to the best of his ability and the Liberals are exactly the opposite. People need to realize this:  How can you protect a country that doesn't exist?  If we would not went to War on Terror then we might not have a country. The terrorist would have kept bombing us and killing us. Then, we wouldn't have a country...then we wouldn't have a Constitution...then we wouldn't have any rights.
419280
Both, I think.  There is significant evidence that our government spies knew a great deal about OBL, and there is apparently also some evidence that his operations have, at times in the past at least, been financed by American money.  So I wonder if he isn't a real terrorist conveniently manipulated by the US Government to have an excuse to put in place the draconian "homeland security" measures to take away our privacy.\n\nThe problem I have with these "emergency" measures is that once the government has the data on individual citizens it seeks, then even if the laws are later declared unconstitutional, the data and the pathways to collect it is still there.  And I am "paranoid" enough to fear Big Brother (or in American, it has become Big Sister) more even than I do Arab terrorists.
781170
That is liberal propaganda for you.  Can't prove a damn thing just throw out an assertion and see if it sticks.  This is what makes liberals the greatest assassins of character and dangerous.  Who was it that said how a lie can get around the world before the truth can be revealed?  \n\nOf course, we all know the Iraq war is an extension of the first Gulf War and Saddam violated at least 15 UN resolutions and Saddam was not contained like the liberals say he was.  He was shooting missles at our planes before we went in which was a direct violation of the agreement after we kicked their ass the first time.  \n\nAfter 9/11 President Bush said if you harbour a terrorist or sponsor a terrorist, you're a terrorist and we're coming after you.  How fast we forget 9/11 and how Saddam was paying terrorist and supporting their dirty deeds.  What bothers me is SADDAM HUSSEIN IS A TERRORIST and no one makes this a point.  No politicians or media calls Saddam a terrorist which he is.  It is the reason we went in.  Could you imagine if his sons had survived our attack?  They were worse than he is!\n\nTerrorists have learned how this countries military can win wars but will be held back by our politicians and how Vietnam was lost politically.  This is why terrorists terrorize!  They are not trying to win militarily but politically.  Liberals calling the war illegal is partisan politics for Democrats being out of power.  Liberals put their party above being an American.  Traitors!  Just ask Joe Leiberman.
954934
Who cares what those people think.  I'm more interested in preventing iran from franchising out nuclear weapons to all the arab states and then blowing up the world as part of jihad.  Whatever it takes to prevent that is justified and if that includes turning Iraq, Iran, Syria and whomever else needs it into a sheet of glass because the liberals in this country won't allow the necessary oversite to prevent this in a humane way, then so be it.\n\nWhat matters is preventing world war 3, not satisfying idiot liberals.
752501
110% agreement about your conclusion concerning France. Spain has already, for all intents and purposes, been defeated. \n\nLet me try and put this in context for the brain dead liberals:\n\nWhen the people in a country have been given the opportunity to form a government that answers to the people instead of the other way around, a government with leaders elected by the people with guaranteed rights and freedoms - and a small minority of Islamic radicals fights to prevent this, using terror tactics and the killing of thousands of innocent men, women and children - how can you possibly call these demented dirt bags, "freedom fighters?" \nJust what the hell is your definition of "freedom?"
687723
Because liberals know that it ISN'T easy to find Osama.  Nor do they want him found, because they share so many of his views.  Not only that, but according to liberals, 9/11 was President Bush's fault, not Osama's.  They never have a bad word to say about Osama.  Both liberals and Osama hate America and doubly hate President Bush.  Osama's continued freedom, combined with his thumbing his nose at the President, delights liberals.  If Osama wrote a book and announced that he was making an appearance at Barnes & Noble for a signing session, liberals would be lined up for miles to meet him. Remember: the liberal's fundamental desire is never to solve a problem, but rather to create a costly government program to institutionalize and perpetuate the problem.
844802
Iraq could be bombed back to the stone age but this is not what is wanted or desired. All out war to annilated every Iraqi citizen would be immoral though at this point probably desired by the Republicans to make the problem go away. Since the results with regard to the war on terror would be unknown the job will have to be finished.
1038463
Not really.  I know where you're coming from but:\n\n1 - Remember how everybody was thinking we had nabbed OBL and would parade him out just before the 04 presidential election?  Of course it did not happen and it won't again this year.\n\n2 - If you were right, Zarqaei would have been killed about mid-October.  It would still be hot news on election day.\n\nBut I wondered the same thing myself when I first heard it.
1077516
Good point.  If I were a liberal, I would have just told the U.S. to "MIND THEIR BUSINESS!", Like they are doing now.\n\n\n-------\n\ndon't you people understand?  the question is a parallel to what Saddam has done.  The liberals are saying things, like, "we should mind our business", and "quit sticking our nose in other countries affairs"
555379
Everyone notice, not one intelligent response or idea from a liberal. Just crap.\n\nEDIT: Hey G, no troops in Pakistan because they don't want them and they would destabilize a teetering government that has nuclear weapons. How many buildings has Bin Laden taken out lately? He is in caves with people who would die to keep him hidden. He will fall eventually. Can't hide forever.\n\nRE-EDIT: 20,000 troops in Afghanistan because they had the military might of the L.A.P.D, we didn't need more, they had the Northern Alliance there to fill the void.\n\n100,000 in Iraq because they had a real military with 500,000 troops. Other than Saddam's regime, there was no one else to take power, hence the large occupation force
491938
Stupid Liberals, I hate them so much. Hey Libs, do me a favor, visit http://www.hannity.com, and also give his show a listen or watch sometime, and see if your not convinced, that your old way of thinking makes absolutely no sense. Go Bush!\n\nHaha, I love reading the answers to this question. Why are liberals so mad all the time? Look, I would much rather have my phone lines tapped, than see 2,000+ people die a fiery death, on US soil any day. In order to preserve freedoms, we must concede some lesser freedoms. It's a shame that people so quickly forget 9/11. It bothers me that people are so against the war, even though we are taking the fight to the terrorists, there haven't been any further attacks on US soil, we are establishing a democracy where others can share in the freedoms we have, where so few are dying for such a great cause (no one is not to many. I would gladly give my life for 100 others to live their life free of an oppressive dictators rule.) and when a dictator that has killed 100,000's of people.
915676
Libs won't like your question. It shoots too big a hole in their original argument (which they refuse to give up) and leaves them seeming to support the continued reign of Saddam over kicking him out.
1020708
Terrorism is not up here.In my logic that says we were right the rest of the world was wrong.And also in my logic you should kill the guilty not the Innocent.\nWhy is liberal logic just the opposite?\nAs to selling peace,we were, they just didn't buy .You can't feed a tiger carrots.
184931
No, they don't!  They should go to a muslim country and try to speak their mind there, and see what happens!  It's not going to be pretty, when the muslims will get done with them!  So, maybe they could help some of us understand why they have so much tolerance for muslims who hate them, and want to kill them; and, why do liberals have no tolerance for christians who only want to help them, and everybody else!  It was the christians who founded this country, and they are the ones who allowed for freedom of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, along with freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom to assembly!  And rights of women, and minorities as well!  Now go try that in any muslim nation!  The liberals are trying to destroy the way of life in America from inside the borders!  The liberals are the enemy within!  Did I forget to mention that liberalism - is a mental disorder!
831772
The Service Chiefs are the experts and I think that everyone should listen to their advice. The problem is that the liberals view them as the enemy. They don't want America to be able to defend itself so they are very anti-military. Look what the loony leftys did to the ROTC in San Francisco. They didn't care that the kids participating wanted to keep the program. They just want to push their Secular Progressive agenda onto everyone.
1119151
Your question is very astute!\n\nIn Bill Sammon's book "Strategery", Al-Zarkawi is quoted from an intercepted letter.  It states that Al-Qaeda's only chance to win is to dupe the stupid and gullible American public into thinking the war is not winnable.\n\nWhat shocks me is that you could read the quote to certain far left Liberals, and they just don't seem to understand that we cannot lose militarily.  We can only lose public support for the war.\n\nThat is Al-Qaeda's goal.  They want us to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.