why is CE configuration the best feasible one ,when compared to  CC and CB?
613253
CE has high current gain , voltage gain about 500 which is suitable for audio frequency circuits.\nCB has unity current gain,voltage gain of abt 150 which is used in high freq circuits but has low current gain(approx 1).\nCC has high i/p resistance and low o/p resistance suitable for impedance matching but has low voltage gain(<1).\nAs CE has high ct and voltage gain its better than CB & CC
65938
Is CSQA popular? I think SCJA/SCJP/SCJD would be more popular...\n\nWell... any certification should be useful !\n\nP.S. I do have Network+ and CCNA
724558
The computer guru at a local shop is a guy who worked for a big company and got tired of the rush to market new products so he quit and set up a shop of his own.\n\nHE  SAYS;\nMac is more stable, harder for hackers to get into. But can be more expensive than IBM pc. Has much better graphics and is easy to use.\n\nIBM Style PC is less expensive and has far more software available.
286258
CE: Common Era; BCE: Before (the) Common Era.\n\nI love those.
1118559
the most advanced configuration would be\n\na really good mb with AGP 8x slot, usb and firewire and network built in, processor over 3 GHz, at least a 1GB of DDR 400 RAM, proll 3 G though, 2 300 GB hard drives, either IDE or SCSI/RAID interface, cool keyboard with fingerprint reader (to be used in place of passwords), mouse, 2 DVD+ and - RW drives with lightscribe technology, 7.1 surround card with front input/output access, all in wonder video card with TV and inputs/outputs (possibly on front), lighted fans or a hydrocooling system, 19' or more monitor, webcam, mic/headset, surround sound speaker system, a really cool case w/ fan controller system/internal temperature reading on front, and XP
135196
Depends up on the OS you are using. If you are open to OS then Linux is a good choice. It can easily help you achieve your objectives of load balancing & HA. Can obtain more info at http://lcic.org/. See a quick intro of Linux at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux.
391098
i am assuming you are trying to minimize losses in a utility distribution system...when i was a system engineer at a utility..the quickest payback items were 1)correcting power factor as close to unity as possible with switched capacitor banks 2)have a policy of sizing distribution transfomers properly in relation to the load (i.e not oversized) to miminimize NL (no load) losses and not undersized too much either to minimize LL (load losses).\n3)size distribution feeder conductors to miminize both NL and LL losses.  The correct point at which you achieve max savings has a good bit to do with your %rate of capital as well as your cost of power both KW and KWH rates.
388350
c. Supercomputer\n\nTop500 supercomputer list is now full of culster systems.\nMany of them are cheap and definitely much cheaper than classic supercomputer solutions.
388344
I don't feel that any of the default layouts are best. It really depends on what you're doing. Personally, I prefer the tools, timeline, actions, properties, and library. But that's just me.
35854
ECS motherboards are more afordable, and questionably less quality.\n\nI own two ECS motherboards (AMD64) (AMD semptron) and both work great =) at the rate computer components are changing, id rather have disposable motherboards than a top of the line one, which will be obsolete by next year\n\nedit: obsolete might be too extreme, lets just say most likely to be of restricted captabilities
1166805
I trust Gateway a little more, but basically it would boil down to price versus options. eMachines is usually a little less expensive for the same performance, while Gateway has been known for slightly higher quality.
444033
carbon copy  and blind carbon copy.  BCC Tends to get me in trouble a lot
725567
I recomend to use what u know better from those 2 PL but for very large applications C++ is stronger.\nBut looking at today's hardware configuration for business applications you can use either C++ or Basic the diference in performance is insignificant, and Basic it's more easy and faster to accomodate with if you don't master the PL yet.
391375
As with most Gateways, you will have trouble with addons in the future. BTX is not a common form factor, power supply might be proprietary, might not be able to add more drives etc.
214981
Yes, for one--a lot of programs installed are configured to load from C:drive. If you change this, they will not be able to operate. \nAlso, your d:drive is probably not configured with as much space as c:drive was. So this is not a good idea. \n\nIf you want to store some things on d:drive, I would not suggest making this a habit. \n\nAlso, when you defrag drive c: it is not going to do drive d:\n\nThere are many reasons that this would not be good.
176209
this has been an issue for along time with computer geeks however it has been found that both camps are right and that it is really up to personal preference computers do eat up more energy being  booted up but the fact that power surges and the mechanical parts in the drive in continuous use causes more where and tear including the , these two points alone show that they both kind of cancel each other out abit and any difference is so insignificant that it is more of a personal preference issue .
717116
Or just find a COTS solution, since such systems are already in use.\n\nIs there a question in here, such as what technology platforms might be appropriate?