Shakespeare said "All the world is a stage".  Is Iran going to be the sequel to Iraq?
609633
I see we're all going to be amused to death.
841887
Iraq is very rich in Oil my son and I believe you. This called "investment"! tomorrow these students would be "Ministers" in Iraq and would "CLOSE THEIR EYES" and sign "BILLIONS DOLLARS"  contract with US companies to buy 'Weapons' and AGAIN have a big war with Iran and others!\n\nIn IRAN we have seen a lot of these kinds of Ministers. Khomeini execute many of them! That is the reasons that US is anger with IRAN as in last 25 years did not get any CONTRACT from Iran!\n\nList of Corrupt Judges and Lawyers involved in my actions  \nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout/judgtable.html\n\nList of corrupt Police Officers in Toronto & montreal\nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout/pig.html\n\nCanadians' Crimes \nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout/canada1.html\n\nList of corrupt judges and lawyers in Canada\nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout/1dictionary.html\n\nCorruption in Justice System in Canada\nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout/80dictionary.html\n\nLAWSUIT v. Canadian Judges and Lawyers\nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout/conflict.html\n\nINDEX\nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout\n\nTORTURE IN CANADA\nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout/section11.html
128918
I would argue that we are already at war with Iran. Iran is the major reason for the fighting in Iraq today. Iran has a great interest in seeing that Iraq is not stabilized and we continue to concentrate our efforts there. With Afghanistan being relatively stable, a stable Iraq means that attention will be focused elsewhere. Like Iran and their nuclear program (which the United Nations has condemned and passed resolutions that Iran must stop it). If Iran has stable democracies with American soldiers in them to their east and to their west, they'd be mighty nervous.
379494
Today?...NO. Somewhere in the near future..YES. Considering he planned the war in Iraq, there is no doubt that he wont invade Iran to. The plans are on the table, the option is open..why no just start a world war 3. I really think that is what this country is coming too.
161945
Sometimes the entire Iran situation looks like Iraq, the current Iranian president 9being an independent candidate) seems like a perfect target to be the next Saddam Hussein. \n\nPolitically, the US is pressurizing the opposition to join them, as it is the governing regime will definitely go weak and then like in any other progressing economy they will have their foot in the door to make sure that there is a well paved road for them to commute whenever they want.\n\nI think only time will tell what exactly is the major game plan here, but one thing is sure it is not going to be a smooth ride and eventually the US will gain something substantial.
491236
Yeah, but they all say that!! I would hope that we learned our lesson from the mess in Iraq about capriously taking things into our own hands. First off, I believe that Iran is all talk- similiar to that of North Korea, so I think it would be smart to continue diplomacy and get the backing of the world if/when that fails. Rushing in without world support will only lead to more problems.
150869
very soon. Does Google Romeo really think that Iran is a peaceful nation? Is that person blind to the truth staring right at him. We know that Iran host terriost, we know they're trying to build nuclear weapons, and if we don't act now, then Iran will be the one who starts lobbin missiles at us instead of the other way around.
662061
Iraq, Iran, or Afghanistan.  They seem to think they know how the world should be run.
482393
No, 9/11 was the start of world war three. Iraq is just a chapter in the war on terroeist
432893
An air strike against Iranian nuclear facilities is unlikely to be surgical. There are about 50 sites associated with nuclear development in Iran and they are mainly sited in towns where civilian populations would be at risk. An attack would be certain to inflame the Islamic world against the US, almost certainly lead to a full-scale civil war in Iraq with the support of the predominantly Shiite Iranian people, and the US fleet in the shallow and narrow Persian Gulf would have to withdraw or be vulnerable to Iranian missile attack.The cynical explanation for the Bush Administration's threats against Iran is that, like the build-up to the invasion of Iraq, the real objective is "regime change", which has been re-enforced by the slump in President Bush's approval rating to 34 per cent.The ramifications of such an attack could be disastrous. At a minimum, it would likely “rally the Iranian public around an otherwise unpopular regime, inflame anti-American anger around the Muslim world, and jeopardize the already fragile U.S. position in Iraq.” But most importantly, a military strike would “almost certainly speed…up” Iran’s nuclear weapons development by sparking a “crash nuclear program that could produce a bomb in a few years.”
534730
IRAN and IRAQ will be the Grave of U.S.A. militarism. No need for changes N to Q or vice-versa
471153
I think Iran is far harder nut to crack than Iraq and it would be biggest Bush's stupidity if he try to attack the country at least now. Besides, Iran can't for now threaten anybody with its uranium-enriching level.
206868
NO DOUBT .. America is doomed.. b/c Wise men have told us that when God makes a man or a nation mad, it is a sign of His will to destroy them NO TEARS for that. But the tragedy is that when it falls, it won't be alone, it will take others >> Iraq is the first nation & Iran will follow pronto.
290601
If there is a war between USA and Iran it will be because Iran is threatening Western Europe and Israel. If that happens, then Iran will be bombed to destroy its infrastructure the way Vietnam was bombed.  Any war with Iran will be a defensive war in response to what Iran has done just as the war in Iraq was due to Iraq's attack on Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Israel and other middle eastern countries.  The USA contrary to public opinion is not a war monger and does not get involved in war unless it is attacked itself, or its allies are attacked.  The US was asked by many oil producing countries to get involved in Iraq, but sadly was not allowed to admit that this is what happened.
292799
The next major one will probably be Iran.  There will be plenty of little ones before then though.
397826
OH MY GOD I HOPE NOT!  there is an article in april 23 L.A. times in Currents written by Zbibinew Brzezinski comparing the build up to the war with Iraq with all the rhetoric thats going on with Iran. Know what? 2nd verse same as the first! its scary.
37791
The answer to that question is both yes and no. Iran’s President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, understands that the world is still suffering oil shock from the recent natural disasters, in addition to the fact that the majority of the US Army and Marines are stabilizing Iraq. This entire plot to stare down the world is merely a tactic of “shock and awe”. \nThe bottom line is no other Middle Eastern country other than Syria has shown support for their actions. Also, no European or North American countries are supportive of their actions. \nIf embargos were enacted and Iran began withholding its oil, the world would not come to an end. Sure prices would rise, but often the will of the people is stronger than any economy or dictator. \nIf all trade was ceased between the majority of the world and Iran, the economic repercussions for Iran would be disastrous. As it is, the government is terribly unstable, faces daily democracy marches, and only gains support through Islamic extremism and terror. \nFinally, if war were to break out, Iran is positioned right between two US allies, Afghanistan and Iraq. This would provide ample staging areas for any type of offensive. Also, as demonstrated during the first gulf war and to some extent during the second, the American and European militaries are designed for short term hit and run tactics which allows modern technology to be used most efficiently. If Iran was to stop selling its oil, it would hurt many countries that might have had a neutral stance at the beginning. With this being true, any military action could easily see the most global coalition that modern warfare has ever seen.\nacansco@yahoo.com