do women perfer uncircumsized or circumsized men???? and why?
600043
Very debatable about whether there is no reason for it.  I prefer not to run the risks of UTI's, thank you very much.
552245
Yes, and for a variety of reasons, most of which have to do with hygiene. Bacteria tend to build up beneath the foreskin if it isn't washed properly every day. Women, for obvious reasons, are then more susceptible to vaginal infections.\n\nA real benefit of circumcision to both men and women is that the friction of the uncovered glans over the years tends to reduce sentitivity a bit, thus leading to the man being longer lasting during sex. There are exceptions to this, but it's generally true.
958451
Yes. A circumcised man is a beautiful sight to see. An uncircumcised one is just disgusting.
846726
I think men believe that the anus is tighter than the vagina in addition to a form of submissiveness.  I wouldn't let a guy enter mine unless he let he enter him first.  So far no takers, lol.
184487
Circumcision is recommended because it is easier for the man to keep his penis clean.  If it is uncircumcised and not cleaned properly, it can lead to infection.
656933
Although most circumcised men would never openly admit to it, they are jealous of men who have foreskins. \n\nThey know that their foreskins were removed without their consent when they were (usually) babies and so they try and make EVERYONE suffer the same abuse as they encountered.\n\nBe proud to be normal and intact - the way that nature intended. \n\nThese days there are NO hygenic reasons for circumcision if you bathe at least once a day. There will therefore be no smell. Accusations otherwise are just born out of ignorance. If you consider most of European men, for instance, are uncircumcised, don't you think they would have moved to circumcision en masse long ago if circumcision was the most hygenic and correct thing to do?\n\nAlmost all other reasons for circumcision are now medically treatable and therefore, circumcision is unneccessary.\n\nFor women, an intact penis is DESIGNED to work better that a circumcised one because the foreskin allows for greater movement during sexual intercourse and less lubrication is required.\n\nIt is also better for the man because his glans is soft and sensitive - the glans on circumcised penises gets thick and hard over the years and decreases sensitivity and can even lead to erection problems.\n\nI am writing this as someone who IS circumcised and I am appalled that a fully functional part of me was trimmed off for no real reason and which has, subsequently, given me a less satisfactory sex life than my uncut counterparts.
1060770
not only in egypt\nyes, its a custom in some african countries, its circumstision (sp?) but for women
1087987
In my experience, sex with a circumcised man verses a non-circumcised man has not been very different.  \n For oral sex on an uncircumcised penis there is the extra skin to work with until the penis is fully extended.  For vaginal intercourse the feel is no different between the two in my opinion.\n   When a grown man gets circumcised it is a lot more painful and will take a while before he will be ready for intercourse again.  Until he is healed you can take advantage of alternative methods of play. \nIf this is what he really wants then I say go for it!  It could spice things up in the marriage to have the change.  You might consider doing something different for fun as well.  It doesn't have to be surgical.  How about a Brazilian wax?\nMy brother had this procedure done when he was older and said it felt like he had a potato in his pants for weeks.  He is very happy with the final result.
221845
its his penis i dont really care\nhard they look pretty much the same anyway\nand ladies if you think a circumsised is so much better watch the procedure being done its barbaric
49312
the "basic" difference is a penis. Women don't have it. There are many other differences though.
1104051
I see you r serious so i don't mind giving you an opinion, but this is just 1 person. I will admit i prefer circumcised, ONLY because i find it more appealing for hygienic reasons. However, I'm not the type to meet u & screw u so if i took the time to know a guy that interested me and it came down to we became intimate and i find out right then, i'm not going to get up and walk out over it, by then it wouldn't matter-unless he was nasty! If hygene is not an issue i will say, it's more to play with and the particular guy i'm using as experience was very sensitive with the addition, and it made it more fun and enjoyable for both of us. He always said that was a big part of it. So if this guy is similiar, he's a lucky guy and will have some great sex as long as he isn't hung up on it, & keeps himself clean he may learn to be happy w/ it. Then it won't matter what some girl thinks, only THE girl, and if she don't know what to do with it, move on.
349222
Speaking as the EX wife of an uncircumcised man......circumcised please.  Not only is it more sanitary but it's so much more appealing to the eye.
744980
Well, I suppose you could say the same thing about circumcision for the males too. There is really no medical justification for it. Just religious/societal beliefs.\n\nI do NOT support this, but know that spiritual beliefs often cause people to do things they wouldn't ordinarily do or do things that are very destructive without realize or admitting it.\n\nThey circumcize females to prevent arousal. To say that females should find joy in fulfilling their womanly duties and giving birth, not through fleshly, sinful sexual stimulation. Just another patriarchal way of keeping women "in line".
358283
The word it circumsized.  Many dontors now consider it a useless operation.  It is also a very painful one for a baby.  As long as an uncircumsized man keeps himself clean, there is no reason for the operation.
621799
Since most people in the world except in curtain countries have uncircumsezed penis's, I am suprised that your not asking about it being the other way round.\n\nThey generally have no problems with either
786223
My husband is circ'd but we decided to leave our son uncut...\n\nThe health reasons are bogus:  should we cut off our daughter's labia because she might get yeast infections, and it's be "cleaner"?  No way!  That's barbaric genital mutilation!  But it's ok for sons?!?\n\nAlso, roughly 40% of boys born these days are left uncut... so the "locker room" argument is also B.S.\n\nWhy hurt a baby?!?
1014829
99% of males are circumcised without thier permission, too\n\nplease won't somebody think of the penises