Who would win in a fight to death?
611222
Chuck Norris would win, beating all 10 simultaneously with a roundhouse kick that contains so much energy that Sub-Zero's mangled corpse would land in Antarctica, preventing global warming by keeping the Ross Ice Shelf frozen.
874450
Depends on whichever one has trained to perfect his techniques, and which one has the best strategy to win in the confrontation.
671555
I would say Cyclops.  Though Omega Red has super human strength and the carbonadium implants in his arms, he lacks one thing that has always defeated him in the past, people to back him up.  Cyclops has the other X-Men to back him up and his optic blasts which can tip over enormous objects or pierce holes in carbon steel plates.  this is also assuming that the battle or his back up do not exceed 15 minutes because it would take him another 15 minutes to regenerate his ability to use the optic blasts.  Even with that in mind I must say that I believe Cyclops would win.  I can always end with the argument...Hey, he's one of the X-Men!  Their the good guys! lol!
477818
Chuck Norris would win. Chuck Norris always wins.
1144992
Well I guess that whoever wanted to lose would be on their side!!
1001894
I have to say Buffy would win. There is a simple answer for this too. Supernatural powers. She has the edge over the others because of this. Plus, Buffy never works alone. And well, I cannot see Gabrielle able to stand a chance against the magical Willow.\n\nSo with the friends and supernatural powers on her side, I think Buffy would be able to take the others down. I mean, Buffy went up against a God. But to be fair, Xena did kill her share of Gods.
238153
Yes, Presidential Death Match!  The winner of the fight represents the US in wars over seas where the leaders of 2 Nations have an all out battle.  We could even do giant robots with people inside, I saw a movie like this once.  The winner gets the others territories, unfortunately I think we would all be living under Alqaida rule because Bin Laden would kick GW's butt in a real fight one on one.  I would have to vote for Chuck Norris in the next election or maybe Mike Tyson, ROFL.
1014815
Wolverine basically can't die therefore he wins...\n\nNEXT!
3515
That depends on who you are fighting.
547757
hahahaha tito ortiz would kill batman. theres no utility belt in the octagon.
271379
Wow it would be a cool shootout...they both would probably die though
441146
wolverine. despite them being fairly evenly matched, wolverine has berserker rage on his side and when he gets like that, he can't distinguish between friend or foe and in that state, he could beat almost anyone
538787
No it would ruin the plot. Who would they fight? I guess they could beat up that bulldog
732128
Neither would win, they would resolve their differences and team up to destroy the evil robots and martians. They would be known as Pinjas. :)
587259
Gee, I don't know....\n\nMaybe they'd just "whoa" each other to death.
1089278
Who would win:\n\n1) USA vs Russia...   USA\n2) Japan vs Iran ....Japan\n3) China vs India... China\n4) Pakistan vs Iran ..... Iran\n5) Italy vs Mongolia.....  Italy
913914
Nah, lets do it like Hamilton and Burr, pistols at 10 paces.  The last man standing wins.\n\nHaving two people fight to settle a difference makes no sense.  Lets say that a modern day Bruce Lee was out there.  Would he always be considered right because he could beat up anyone who disagreed with him?  This would lead to a might makes right scenario and historically, that does not work.\n\nAlso, what about if Peewee Herman and Evander Hollyfield disagreed about something?  I admit, that would probably be pretty funny to watch, but all we would be settling is that Evander can hurt Peewee in oh so many ways.\n\nAn organized debate would make a lot more sense.  A mediator makes the most sense.