Can you answer these bible questions? Part 4?
604793
14. B \n\n15. Obviously, Jesus obeyed the traditions that were expected of any Jew, or He would never have gone to the Temple as a baby to be circumcised. "Moses seat" is a tradition, because it is not found anywhere in the Old Testament. So its A and B.
1106582
Please give a Biblical reference for what you are talking about.
809925
I noticed that you started doing these riddles a few days ago. Brain teasers and riddles often fascinate me, so I would look forward to more of these puzzles from you.\n\nOn the one where it was King James Bible, I had thought of that but dismissed my own answer. Should have gone with my first instinct as I have since learned.\n\nAnyways, yes, I do look forward to your riddles and will attempt to solve them as I can.
1147037
The Bible is so mysterious... I wish someone had all the answers. I'm driving myself nuts over questions like this everyday. Good luck!
149426
which bible do u mean? I think u people have got many bibles...and y would u care about the "number" while nobody cares about following the bible by NOT committing this deadly sin (adultery)
1027393
FACT 1: A couple drove down a country road for several miles, not saying a word. An earlier discussion had led to an argument and neither of them wanted to concede their position. As they passed a barnyard of mules, goats, and pigs, the husband asked sarcastically, "Relatives of yours?" "Yep," the wife replied, "in-laws."\n\nFACT 2: W O R D S A husband read an article to his wife about how many words women use a day... 30,000 to a man's 15,000. The wife replied, "The reason has to be because we have to repeat everything to men... The husband then turned to his wife and asked, "What?"\n\nFACT 3: CREATION A man said to his wife one day, "I don't know how you can be so stupid and so beautiful all at the same time." The wife responded, "Allow me to explain. God made me beautiful so you would be attracted to me; God made me stupid so I would be attracted to you!\n\nFACT 4: WHO DOES WHAT A man and his wife were having an argument about who should brew the coffee each morning. The wife said, "You should do it, because you get up first, and then we don't have to wait as long to get our coffee." The husband said, " You are in charge of cooking around here and you should do it, because that is your job, and I can just wait for my coffee." Wife replies, "No, you should do it, and besides, it is in the Bible that the man should do the coffee." Husband replies, "I can't believe that, show me." So she fetched the Bible, and opened the New Testament and showed him at the top of several pages, that it indeed says.........."HEBREWS"\n\nFACT 5: The Silent Treatment A man and his wife were having some problems at home and were giving each other the silent treatment. Suddenly, the man realized that the next day, he would need his wife to wake him at 5:00 AM for an early morning business flight. Not wanting to be the first to break the silence (and LOSE), he wrote on a piece of paper, "Please wake me at 5:00 AM." He left it where he knew she would find it. The next morning, the man woke up, only to discover it was 9:00 AM and he had missed his flight. Furious, he was about to go and see why his wife hadn't wakened him, when he noticed a piece of paper by the bed. The paper said, "It is 5:00 AM. Wake up." Men are not equipped for these kinds of contests.\n\nAND FINALLY\n\nFACT 6: God may have created man before woman, but there is always a rough draft before the Masterpiece!
308524
Wow, there's a question that requires a book to answer! :)\n\nI would recommend a webpage like this one:\n\nhttp://www.beliefnet.com/index/index_10000.html\n\nI can answer questions about all the Christianity-related ones (Chrstian, which includes also Catholic, Baptist, Pentecostal). Feel free to send me an e-mail if you want the long version!
454072
Joshua.  People like you crack me up.  Really!  You argue about biblical-specific entries and events as if they were factual and undeniable.  "written 4000 years ago"  On what?  Notebook paper?  Do you have some copies of those 4000 year old writings?  Do you have some secret text that nobody else has ever seen?  Are you on heroin or acid?  What's your trip?  None of the authors of the NT witnessed the alleged resurrection.  No matter how you stretch it, there are no actual accounts of it.  Most of the NT was created and written in 320AD under the direction of Constantine the Great, and its puirpose was NOT for historic accuracy.  Its purpose was to create a doctrine at the Council of Nicea that all factions of religious doctrine could agree upon and pull everyone together.  Why does it appear that there only a few people that post here regularly who actually know this?  Is your only source of "history" the Bible itself?  Are you crazy enough to use the Bible to prove the Bible?  Talk about illogic!\n\nThe original poster is correct -- if the notion of god portrayed in the bible is accurate, then there is no need for "free will" -- God already knows how things turn out.  He already knows who chooses free will and who doesn't choose free will, how they act, and who the sinners are and who goes to hell.  He already knows the choices people made in the past and what they'll make in the future.  He already knows how things will turn.  Already been there.  Outside of the time line?  Fine, state it however you wish.  It's still the same.  He's all knowing.  He knows how the "souls" will turn out. There's no need for a test on earth.\n\nThe question is not flawed at all.  Your assumption that the Bible is incontrovertible is flawed, and your statements of biblical myths as assertion are ridiculous.  It is one of hundreds of unprovable myths on this whole planet, full of fatal flaws, like the one this question raises.
450360
what chapter in 2nd kings i see you have verses 23-25 but i need the chapter\n\nhttp://etext.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/Rsv2Kgs.html
1039643
You make some very good points. The bible was written in a time when homosexuality wasnt very common, people read into it much too far and take something out of it that could very well be not true.
770290
Question:\n\n1.  Who was this king who besiege Jerusalem during the 3rd year reign of Jehoiakin king of Judah (ans: Nebuchadnezzar)\n\n2.  Who is this man who interpret the dream of king Nebuchadnezzar (ans: Daniel)\n\n3.  What is the other name given to Daniel by king Nebuchadnezzar (Ans: Belteshazzar)
454609
If you really want the answer, then go here...\nhttp://www.biblebelievers.org/lages.htm
151200
1) seven - if all of the sheep have died, *except* seven of them, then logically seven of them have lived.  The remaining twelve have died.\n\n2) Bobby - If three of the children are named, and neither of the names are 'Bobby', then it stands to reason that "Bobby" is the fourth.  (Aside from being given the answer using the possessive form of his name.)\n\n3) himself - The man is an only child, and he is looking at himself in the photograph, since he is his father's son.\n\n4) glass - Greenhouses are made of "green" glass, not wood, since the wood would not let the light in for the plants.\n\n5) two - if you "take" two of the apples, then you only have two in your possession.  The rest are for anyone else to take.\n\n6) He's dead - if the man has a 'widow', then it means he is dead.  It stands to reason that there are most likely no laws on the books that allow for a living person to marry a corpse.\n\n7) Noah took them, not Moses - The ark used to carry two of each animal was built by Noah according to the old testament.  The story of Moses came later and he didn't gather animals in groups of two.\n\n8) one - if you disregard that some people believe in re-incarnation, any man, not just the average man, has only one day that he is physically born, but he celebrates that day each year for the rest of his life.
338676
Is this act Biblical?  (I'm curious to know....thanks!)
126814
Check out my answers....most of them don't have those phrases and I am a Christian. I do use the Bible as a reference for some questions that I answer.
222949
GodShew, could you please enlighten me (and hopefully other Christians) as to what Bible you are referring to when you come up with your questions/answers/comments. Sometimes you Bless ppl in the name of God, and sometimes it almost seems as though you are cursing His Word. Although this comment may seem offensive to you, that is not what I want to accomplish. I just truly want to know, where do you stand on the TRUE Word of God?\n\nWhy do you sometimes speak in "code?" If demons are putting this in your head, you are responsible for rebuking them. Since you know SOME truths about God's Word (even though many times you twist it, as is a characteristic of Satan and his demons), you are responsible for your actions, as it is my responsibility as a Christian to tell you that.
8351
I'll keep this short and sweet. Because it's the truth,you can read this in any bible. But first if you don't understand the bible get someone to help you understand it. People that don't believe this then they know nothing when it comes to the bible. I have three different bibles in my home and they all say the same thing Jesus is God's son....