The news reported that the pentagon released new footage of sept. 11th but its the same footage as before.why?
612669
It is the same footage because before it was leaked, now it has been officially released. This is what I heard here but I havn't been in the US since last november. Your link was the first i saw this footage leaked or released.\n\nCan't tell that it's a plane. My computers not great and it's a small viewing box but I guess enough have said it's not great where I believe that a larger view wouldn't help much. It also appears to come in horizontally only fueling my suspicion. I imagine a plane would come in at an angle, especially since the pentagon is not that high. Never flew a plane but flew enough simulators to know skimming across the ground that low ain't easy, especially for someone with little flight experience and probably never flew an actual jumbo jet before. Looks like a rocket fired sideways like in an explosion test. I can't tell it's even the pentagon. If they hoped to clear up rumors that doesn't help. They really did it anyway to remind us why we fight.
165393
Claim: First is that there was NO plane found at or near the pentagon. \n\nFact: A disintegrated American Airlines Boeing 757-223 (N644AA) was found on the lawn and inside of the Pentagon.\n\nClaim: a janitor in the first tower who heard an explosion in the basement minutes before the plane hit.\n\nFact: Thousands of other people heard and saw the explosion come from over their heads. Video images show Boeing 767’s hitting both of the towers.\n\nClaim: Also, research was done on the flights, and most cross country flights are booked to capacity but those 4 that day (towers, pentagon, flight 93) were all booked to LESS than half capacity, as if they knew what was going to happen.\n\nFact: Load factors for American and United Airlines had been very low on all flights. They were already hemorrhaging money and United eventually went into bankruptcy. American is still losing their shirt. This was competition in action…not predestination.\n\nClaim: The pilots apparently weren't good and I think he said 1 or 2 didn't even have the pilot’s license.\n\nFact: The pilots (I assume you mean the terrorist pilots) had enough training to steer an airliner into a building. You don’t need to be much beyond a private pilot with some internet information available to be able to fly an airliner in a reckless manner into a large target. But you probably couldn’t do it twice.\n\nClaim: The article alluded that the government had a lot to do with (or planned attacks)... ran out of characters :-(\n\nFact: The government’s too big to keep a secret this big. Too many people have big mouths…and coordinating a mass suicide would not be something many people would agree to get involved with.
779876
The folks at the Pentagon no longer let me sit in on the intelligence briefings.  I do know that Iraq did not cause 911, and nobody in the government has ever said it did.  I don't know where this inaccurate info came from .  Why would you think you would be in the loop in regards to the status on bin laden?  Don't you think that the fewer the people know what's going on, the better chances we have in catching him off guard?
1166933
This video is very compelling evidence that there's a lot more to the events of 9/11 than most people know.  A few of the things in the Loose Change video are inaccurate, but it compiles enough accurate information to lead to further questions.  \n\nTo the people who say things like "this has all been disproven" or "it's just conspiracy theories" you are fooling yourselves.  The famous philospher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) said “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident”.  People will believe any lie either because they want it to be true, or because they fear it is true.  The lie you are believing is that the official story of how the events of 9/11 occurred are true.  When you OBJECTIVELY analysis the scientific evidence -- as a detective or scientist would -- without injecting false patriatism into the equation -- you realize that it is simply physically impossible that things happened as we've been led to believe.\nAnd  as a side note, questioning the events of 9/11 is NOT unpatriotic.  On the contrary, it's about the most patriotic thing you can do.  We have a duty to defend this great nation of ours against ALL threats, foriegn AND DOMESTIC.  And the families of the victims of 9/11 have a right to know the TRUTH of how and why their loved ones died.  In that spirit, I present the following very small bits of information concerning the events of 9/11.\n\nYou can’t collapse a skyscraper with jet fuel.\nMany engineers have come forward and said that there’s no way those buildings fell from fire.  Steel doesn’t weaken until almost 2000 degrees F, and it doesn’t melt until almost 3000 degrees F.  Jet fuel doesn’t burn hot enough to do it.\nThe official NIST report states “The initial jet fuel fires themselves lasted at most a few minutes” and office material fires would burn out within about 20 minutes in a given location. (NIST, 2005; p. 179, emphasis added.)   The final NIST report on the Towers admits:  \n"Of the more than 170 areas examined on 16 perimeter column panels, only three columns had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250ºC… Only two core column specimens had sufficient paint remaining to make such an analysis, and their temperatures did not reach 250 ºC. ... Using metallographic analysis, NIST determined that there was no evidence that any of the samples had reached temperatures above 600 ºC."  (NIST, 2005, pp. 176-177) \nKevin Ryan, the engineer from the company that underwrote the towers, said it was impossible that a jet fuel fire brought the towers down.  The architect who designed the twin towers has repeatedly said that he designed them to take not 1, but 2, massive passenger airliner impacts and not fall.  \nPools of molten steel were found in the basements of the towers (including tower 7) weeks after 9/11.  Steel melts at 2777 degrees F.  Jet fuel burns at only 1577 degrees F.  It is literally impossible for jet fuel fires to get hot enough to melt steel into molten pools.  Something else must have done it.\n\nFirefighters and survivors said repeatedly that bombs were going off throughout the towers, on many different floors. Firefighters gave very specific descriptions of seeing flashes of light and explosions going off on the lower levels.   If you watch the news from that morning, you'll even see Fox news reporting a "4th explosion" going off in tower 1.   For instance, at the start of the collapse of the South Tower a Fox  News anchor reported:   “There is an explosion at the base of the building… white smoke from the bottom… something happened at the base of the building!  Then another explosion.”\nFirefighter Edward Cachia independently reported:  \n“[We] thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came
305251
yeah thats true.I remember that that movie was supposed to air on T.V in the U.K around the time of 9/11 and they didnt show it because it was similar to what happened.
506645
OF COURSE THE SEPTEMBER 11 INCIDENTS WHERE ACTUALLY FAKE JUST LIKE THE MOON LANDING . AMERICA AGAIN FOOLED THE WORLD.\n\nTHERE IS EVEN A VIDEO ABOUT THIS .\n\nTHE MAIN REASONS THAT THEY SAY ARE AS FOLLOWS\n\n1.THE AIRCRAFTS THAT STRIKED THE WTC TOWERS WERE NOT HAVING ANY WINDOWS WHICH CLEARLY SHOWED THAT THEY ARE NOT PASSENGER AIRCRAFTS . PROBABLY MILITARY CARGOS .\n\n2. WHEN THE VIDEO IS ZOOMED IN WE CAN CLEARLY SEE SOME THING THAT IS ATTACHED TO THE BELLY OF THE AIRCRAFT .NO PASSENGER AIRCRAFT WILL HAVE SOME THING THIS ATTACHED TO ITS FUSELAGE .WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS THAT IT IS NOT A PASSENGER AIRCRAFT .\n\n3. THERE IS AN SMALL EXPLOSION ON BOTH THE AIRCRAFTS JUST BEFORE STRIKING INSIDE THE WTC TOWER . THIS CAN BE CLEARY SEEN IF THE VIDEOS ARE ZOOMED . \n\n4.IN THE VIDEO THAT SHOWS THE PENTAGON ATTACK THERE IS NO AIRCRAFT AT ALL SHOWN IN THE VIDEO .ONLY A SUDDEN EXPLOSION IS SHOWN .ALSO THERE IS NOT EVEN A SINGLE PIECE OF AIRCRAFT WRECKAGE ON THE SITE EVEN IN THE VIDEOS THAT WERE TAKEN IMMEDIATLY AFTER THE INCIDENT .\n\n5.ALSO A STUDY HAS CONFIRMED THAT IF A BOEING 757 WITH THE SAID AMOUNT OF FUEL CRASHED INTO THE PENTAGON THE DAMAGE WOULD BE VERY MUCH MORE THAN THIS . ANALYSISTS HAVE CALCULATED THE IMPACT STRENGTH AND THE CAPABILITY OF THE MATERIALS WITH WHICH PENTAGON IS CONSTRUCTED .\n\nAMAERICA JUST WANTED A REASON TO ATTACK TALIBAN .\n\nOTHERWISE JUST IMAGINE , IF THE TALIBAN HAD BEEN ACTUALLY BEHIND THIS THEN THEY WOULD HAVE SURELY CLAIMED THE RESPONSIBILITY .\n\nGEORGE.W.BUSH IS A TRAITOR . HE EVEN FOOLED THE AMERICANS ALSO . JUST LIKE NASA FOOLED THE AMERICANS AND REST OF THE WORLD BY SAYING THAT THEY LANDED ON THE MOON AND SHOWED MANY FAKE VIDEOS .\n\nAMERICANS WILL HAVE REMEMBER ONE THING -- WHATEVER YOU DO -- SOME IS WATCHING IT FROM ABOVE -- GOD .YOU WILL BE PUNISHED .
597923
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change
918595
there are surveilliance cameras every 100 feet around the Pentagon. All video of the crash has been locked away.\n\nOther facts:\n\n-multiple explosions were heard as the buildings were collapsing.\n-there was an explosion on the first floor of WTC lobby elevator shaft before the building fell.\n-passport was found at ground zero belonging to one of the highjackers, completely intact.\n-9 of the 19 highjackers were found ALIVE in various parts of the world, after 9/11.\n-all building security was removed, for a few hours, from the WTC 2 weeks before 9/11 so that government agents could perform a security drill.\n-cell phone technology wasn't well enough in 2001 to allow calls from planes.\n\nSomething sinister has happened. Since then the US government has created laws (Patriot Act, Homeland Security Act) that allow them to do whatever they want whenever they want in the name of Homeland Security.\n\nJust wait until the time comes when all US citizens are required to have RFID implants. Laws will be in place so that you cannot function without having one. No banking, no shopping, no medical visits.\n\nUSA Freedom...just an illusion.
396213
That video, as well as many other on that subject can be seen at my link. I tend to view these as propaganda. Of course, I view everything that comes out of the White House on this subject propaganda, too. There are facts that will never be known. There are too many discrepancies on both sides of the argument to make an informed decision one way or the other...
611622
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=loose+change\n\nWatch that video. It will answer all your 9/11 related questions. It is an hour and twenty minutes long but it is a good film.
412944
Yea it's Conspiracy, If U have lime wire then Search about 9-11 Conspiracy on Movie. U'll find a Program over there Show U that there was No plain Hit the Pentagon & They Just Say So, & The Plain which Hit the two Building had A Missle on Them ... There Is No Boing Have Missle & There is No Missile even in Cargo plain. & How G.W.Bush told the PPL that He open the TV & watched they show the First Plain hit the Building & They Didn't Capture that one by News Cam & they got it from someone who was capture a fire beside that Building ... Alot U going to Discover on that Movie. To be sure it's the Movie ... Just write on Lime Wire Video search " 911 Conspiracy " & Then find the Movie which have size 498 MB. Then Download it & U'll discover that The Government of USA did Allllllllllllllllll.
1114376
you again?, well just in case you didn't get them the first time:\n\nhttp://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html\nhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html\nhttp://wtc.nist.gov/
460707
ok i've watched loose change four times or so now, and spent way too much time reading on various websites, they make some convincing points...but then they ignore alot of stuff as well...like common sense.\n\ncould there be some conspiracy behind 911? yes there could be. is it these theories that are popularly being advanced currently on the web...no\n\nstart at the end and work your way forward: the point of 911 was to destroy some buildings.  there are easier ways for the government to pull this off than to.\nsecretly swap planes in the air for non-passenger drone places, fly two of them into buildings, which they already rigged with additional explosives, secretly land the planes, secretly kill the passengers, fake a plane crash at one location, get voice samples from passengers to load into a computer to produce fake phone calls to loved ones with, then swap one plane for a missle (never mind that some claim this was a smaller drone plane) fire it into the pentagon, get 100 or so people to claim they saw a plane(this is ignored by loose change which uses two of the four people that claimed to not have seen a plane) then run around real fast knocking over the light poles etc...loose change claims a plane couldn't knock over those lamp poles that way, but never tries to explain how they were knocked over, if we assume that not all 100+ witnesses were cia plants, then we have to wonder why no one went, "and there these guys ran around loosening all the bolts on those lamps and pushed them over and ran off! dam kids!"\n\nloose change and other sources also use alot of broadcasts from very early after the attacks took place during which there was alot of confusion about what happened, live news especially while something is happening doesn't always get things 100% correct and uses alot of speculation to fill in time while they figure things out.\n\nloud thuds of things like, say upper floors falling into lower ones, could no doubt sound very much like other explosions going off.\n\nthe list goes on and on, but this post is getting rather long.\n\nok so lets face it, thats one complicated plan to bring down some buildings.  you could just blow them up, blame who ever you wanted to, say you are investigating how security could have been breached to such an extent, and leave it at that.\n\nits just too complicated of a conspiracy, that would take way way too many people to keep their mouths shut.
1073198
Reporting on what has already happened is ok. That is news reporting. Problem is they like to broadcast in advance leaked planns for attack. "Sources in the pentagon say that the AirForce is planning an air strike between midnight and 6 am. They want to try and catch Osama by surprise" Is there any question why we can't find the son of a bitch when reports like this make it to the 6 o'clock news the day before the attack is supposed to happen. Do you think perhaps Osama might have someone with a satalite dish, Fox news channel, and a cell phone???
1007281
People are going to believe what they want to believe.  I saw a plane crash into a building.  Was it real or was it created by Hollywood.  The only people that really know are the one's that were there.  Al Qaida has taken resposibility for the 911 attacks. So? Who do you think did it?
1120136
Here is the full link\n\n http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=loose+change
1154170
9-11  Are you serious?  I watch it the conspiracy is the oldest wrong info around.  My father work in Homeland Security.  The facts are what we saw the stories people tell are just that.  We were attacked!!!!