Will Charlie Sheen's stance against the official 911 explanation be followed by other brave celebrities?
603009
You know, I'm all for conspiracy theories, but the 9/11 ones are just silly.
962679
Hope fully some of them will though it's very doubtful.Much like "the great leader" himself they seem to think reality will be different if you just keep believing it is.\nIf you just repeat lies long enough and belief in them hard enough,they will eventually become true.That seems to be the right wing ideology\nFurthermore there is a whole propaganda network to keep them sleeping.Like the websites that are being spammed here recently,fox news etc.\nBesides that there is the tragedy of good honest people who believed in Bush and the pain it will do them to realize they were mislead.That's a psychological thing,the mind has trouble letting go if you believed in something passionately
368320
Anyone who answers yes to this question is not. A "do gooder" true at heart will remain annonymous. Everyone else has an agenda.
698937
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-6cLovllX4\n\nI didn't even see it or hear about it and utube has dropped the video.  this is all I could find. \n\n\nI don't think in the end it will hurt his image to much.   Celebrities can literally get away with murder.  It will all be quiet soon
537431
I totally agree! If you have nothing to hide, why worry? \n\nIf it will get terrorist caught, drug dealers brought down, child predators put away, rapist thrown behind bars, etc.\n\nWhat a wonderful world it would be..\n\nPersonally, I thought the CIA flagged calls from terrorist all along! I was so surprised to find out that it wasn't so. I feel much safer knowing that this is being done now... Maybe that is why we haven't had another 911.
274128
Thanks.  That clears away some thoughts of a dark conspiracy.  I believe in a strong two-party system (as the best of all checks and balances) while permitting unlimited small parties to come and go.  Both parties deserve to share the celebrities.  They can help draw attention to candidates who need to get their message out.  Celebrities are often strongly motivated enough to even get into politics and run for office (as any of us are free to do).  My main objection is that certain celebrities who are probably too involved with their careers to study the issues merely parrot the invective of highly partisan (and highly paid?) political activists and bring very little real information to the debate.  I wish they would just shut up and cast their one vote; just like me.  But speech is free.
180145
Officially: Lee Harvey Oswald\n\nUnofficially: ? \nThere is a conspiracy out there to hide us from the truth.\nI guess I watched JFK (the movie) too many times.
592988
K-9, I love your insight. People watch too much Fox News and CNN and refuse to do any research for themselves. Ignorance is no excuse, we all should seek truth, no matter what. My husband still proclaims what the media and government has been forcefeeding the US and the world for 4 years, and he thinks I'm insane to beleive any different. He still beleives this after he lost the use of his right leg and permanently injured his spine in combat. It's sickening how some people refuse to see the truth even when it's right in your face. They never gave any CONCRETE proof Al Qieda had anything to do with the WTC attacks. I don't buy it. I see a more sinister possibility of what likely happened...and I'm sure you do too.
1160888
The shortest quickest easiest answer to this question that fulfills all of the above conditions while introducing the least amount of explanation ( applying Ockhams razor) is that 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.  TruthSeeker you rock!!
846164
He is a bit of a sham, I agree. I often have thought his points of view were biased in some way, and I think that he does alot of inappropriate things for ratings. I don't think a family's intervention to a member who has a drug or other addiction should be televised and should pass as entertainment. I think he has done some shameful things and you very well may be right, this could be one of them.
242565
i wouldve answered it but i couldnt figure out how to leave a comment. charlie sheen is pretty liberal. so he could just be reading into the planes trns and all too much. im a socialist so i dont have room to talk about his political views.\ncheck out my blog www.myspace.com/HappyBuddaH
877436
You raise the big question that is never answered.  The big boys make decisions for us all, based on what and for whom?  We are naively raised to believe that they are serving us, but we all are savvy enough now to realize that the story we were told is not often true at all.  Whether it is Iraq or Afghanistan, Katrina, education, our borders, whatever, we find that there is a huge difference from what we expect  and what actually happens.  We all suspect, for whatever reason, that things are not on the level, and that our interests are being sold down the river.  Some of us think it is minor, some of us think it is treason.  What we get are phony explanations with the truth obscured for generations, all to protect us.  Whether it is JFK's assassination, the 9/11 investigation where the important chapter is not released, the true story of why there was no help for our citizens after Katrina and no insurance for their losses, we find we don't get the true story.  You can bet we will not get it now while we invade countries that have not attacked us, all under the guise of going after the perpetrators of 9/11.  What is Cheney doing talking to the Saudi Prince?  We would all like to know.
1075311
yes. he lied about seeing the 1st plane hit on cnn but the footage didnt air for another 14 hours. the fbi, cia, nas & dod all had info in the hijackers. their locations, pasts, their financing, their intentions & the training they were getting. its all been documented.  http://scotthortonshow.com/
938342
alright man, just go to www.st911.org. I believe there is a list on www.911truth.org. It will blow your mind.
989405
There are a few "celebrities" who actually practice what they preach. Very few. Most just go about their privledged lives and spew crap because people listen to them. I like the book title, although you should drop the "uneducated" part. That way you could have a "forward" by John Kerry and Al Gore.
737362
No "Paul I", those people are not crazy.  In fact, they represent a growing consensus about what happened on 9/11.  They are  brave people who have enough courage to question our governments white wash of the attack.\n\nMost all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny. \n\nFAKE CONFESSION\nThe official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.\nhttp://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg\n\n\nEVIDENCE\nThere are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.\nhttp://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM\n\n\nHere is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=\n\nMolten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid.\nhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite\n\nA chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.\nhttp://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml\n\nCONFESSION \nWe also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329\n\nTESTIMONY\nThere is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole."\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=\n\nMOTIVE\nThe New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.\nhttp://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf\n\nOPPORTUNITY\nWitnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.\nSee "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA
610473
sure 911truth and the "loose change" film both say that.  i'd like to see a more thorough and objective investigation of these claims, however. and such an investigation must not be hindered by balking attacks. is it me, or is it that any body who raises some kind of question or proposes there was an alternative explanation to 9-11, is thrown to the wolves for being a tin-hat wearing conspiracy theorist?  why can't we be more like factcheck about this? it is not helpful to be dismissive NOR is it helpful to carelessly throw unfounded paranoid ideas into these discussions. how about we investigate 9-11 using the scientific method? what a concept