explain the movie END GAME?
606734
if you are talking about the movie that comes out this year it is about a secret agent and a reporter who are investigating a assination attepmt on the president.  it has cuba gooding jr, and james woods in it.
1002131
I just saw a few minutes ago and I think that overall the movie was good but the ending was a little farfetched and the dialouge is to dull. The action is very well done and the story is very involving (as you can see In trying not to give it a way) I would go see it, my only major problems are the Hollywood ending and the shortness of the film.\n 4 out of 5 stars.
697201
I completely feel you on this...I've seen that movie myself, and a few others.  There are so many questions, I don't understand how people can just ignore it...and in fact get mad at you for questioning it!  Isn't that the point of democracy, being allowed to examine what's going on and make an educated decision?  Don't let the mean remarks that you will inevitably get bring you down...you are a thinker, and that is to be commended!\n\nEDIT: Nikki, here is the link:  http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7218920724339766288&q=loose+change
124123
are you referring to the city or the movie? since your question's in the movie category, i assume this is about the movie? the one starring eric bana? This movie attempts to illuminate both sides of Israel's conflict. While the focus is on Israeli actions and choices, Palestinian and Arab motivations are present throughout the work. For me, Speilberg's treatment of both sides was an attempt at balance. Neither side is commended or exaulted for their behavior. Instead, the film attempts to generally question the nature of their decisions and acts. \n\nIf this film does make any stance on Israel and Palestine, it makes a general condemnation of the violence on both sides. Speilberg goes through great lengths to show the cycle of violence - lamenting the perpetual loss of life in violent conflict.\n\nThe film's conclusion extends Speilberg's effort to question violence and its role in human affairs. The protagonist chooses against returning home - he lives in exile. The cycle of violence has taken a toll on him. \n\nI'm unclear in deciding whether the protagonist approves or condemns of his own choices. But I do believe that he realizes that violence is not a future solution. \n\nI think that this was a geniune attempt at thoughtful reflection of the consequences of violent conflict. For a mainstream movie, this had unusual depth. I felt that there was an honest attempt to depict both sides as human beings - with rational, legitmate values and motivations. \n\nI would encourage anyone to see this film. Audiences should try to analyze both the film's perspective and their our own beliefs on the real world content behind the work. Any film that can spark people to pose these serious questions deserves attention.
1091771
Curator at the Louvre is murdered.\nHarvard Professor is called in to explain the murder, which involves strange symbols.\nCurator's granddaughter shows up, rescues professor.\nTogether they uncover clues to a huge conspiracy in which the Catholic Church has buried that Jesus and Mary Magdelene had a child and there are living descendents of Jesus.\nTurns out the curator's granddaughter is a descendent of Jesus. At the end, the professor finds the resting place of Mary Magdalene.\n\nThat's the basic plot. Go see the movie. It's good.
834698
Like Jack Sparrow! So sad what happened at the end of the 2nd movie. No, I don't say savvy after everything I say "in accordance with the prophecy". That works with everything, I swear. I'll throw a savvy from time to time for you.
770301
Well, I'll differ from the rest of the gang here.\n\nYes, "The Fountain" is one of the strongest movies made ever. But you need to watch it unlike any Hollywood movie.\n\n"The Fountain" is not a movie with an "end" or final outcome to it. It is a journey of a man's(or Man's) quest to protect what he loves, which gets manifested across ages. It is about coming to terms with your love for a person and what you're willing to do for it.\n\nIt is best watched with your guards lowered, and let emotions of the movie reach out to your heart. Like life, the "Fountain of life" is not about reaching the destination, but the experience of the journey.
7093
It's a documentary (narrated by Morgan Freeman) about emperor penguins and their yearly single-lined march across the harsh an inospitable Antarctica landscape until reach their breeding ground. I guess you accompany everything from courtship to the birth of baby penguins.\n\nDo you mean watching the movie to celebrate your birtday or getting a copy of the film as a birthday gift?\n\nEither way, if you're a fan of penguins, you're bound to like this movie. A friend of mine really liked it and he is only mildly interested in penguins.\n\nHope i can help, bye
439360
I don't quite remember the movie . . . but as a multiverse . . . where the outcome of any possible scenario has happen in a parallel universe . . . \n\nThere have many theories about it . . . none have been proven yet.
545781
Lazarus Child. it's less than 2 hours and I dont understand the story
250592
I know alot but there is no real plot so I'm just gona throw stuff out...\n\nWell...Jack owes a blood dept of some kind to Davey jones and ends up messing up Will and Elizabeths wedding and gets them arrested because he comes and asks for their help. His crew somehow consistes of barbosas old crew. Jack ends up on the caniable island where he finds a treasure chest that he has to fight over with the caniables and Davey jones crew. Will meets his Father. Barbosa becomes a good guy and helps Willand jack. The compass that doesn;t point north realy poinst to your greatest desires. Elizabeth becomes a pirate. Comodore is a part of Jacks crew. Jack dies when he goes down with the balck prearl but in the 3rd movie will saves hom. Yup..that is all I know in a nutshell!
612511
It's the movie Sphere until the end when everyone goes home, that's not what happened...  A lot of people died in the movie.
835515
i dont know about the game but the movie was AWESOME!!!! \n:)
439498
It was a good movie, but I think they went just a little to far in the action of the movie.  There were to many scenes with to much action scenes, to close together. They tried to make an action/romance movie, but they didn't balance it right. I do not really know how to explain it, but there you are!
733845
Frank is a friend of Donnie's sister who come back from the future to help guide Donnie into saving the world from coming to an end. What happens in the film from the moment Frank first says "Wake up" is happening in a 'tangent universe', meaning an alternate reality.\n\nIt's a twisted story of Christ (I think). Frank is supposed to be an angel watching over Donnie - when he wakes Donnie up to meet him for the first time, after Donnie gets out of bed the camera pans up to film a poster of an angel. Also after the jet engine has crashed into his room, Donnie's dad talks about a guy who'd been killed when they we kids (incidentally that guy was called Frank, but I'm not exactly sure what that signifies) in a similar freak accident, and Donnie's dad says that Donnie "must have someone watching over him". Donnie is supposed to represent Christ, because he has to travel back in time and sacrifice himself in order to save the world, and Frank guides him along the way, with the acts Frank persuades Donnie to commit along the way proof of Frank's power (eg When Donnie burns down the house, the child porn stash is found). Also, when Donnie walks out of the cinema to burn the house, a sign shows a film called "The Last Temptation of Christ", showing that this was the last act Donnie (christ) would have to commit before his final sacrifice. \n\nI'm not completely sure about this theory, what I just wrote was what I thought having seen the original version of the film, but the director's cut put it in a different light. It gave more details of Roberta Sparrow's book (The Philosophy of Time Travel) which suggested that Frank was only doing it to save himself, and persuading Donnie to kill himself to "save the world" was a trick so that Frank could survive. It also explains how Donnie was able to move back in time. (This was because he was a 'Living Manipulated' according to the book and had the power to control water and metal (there's a scene when he looks at the sprinklers and they suddenly turn off - when he finds Jim Cunningham's wallet). He is also able to create a wormhole because Frank has given him that power - remember Frank telling Donnie he "can do anything [he] wants", and that Donnie can too, and then later showing Donnie how to create a wormhole in the cinema. So Donnie now has a wormhole and the ability to move metal faster than the speed of light - which, if you remember the conversation with his Physics teacher, are the two things he needs to create a rift in time.\n\nI probably just confused you more, try watching it again after reading this. Every time you watch this film you will notice something new, understand one more thing, but you'll also probably find another thing not to understand.
567469
That movie is awesome! It's hard to say what my fave part was. If I had to choose, though, it would be the war scene when everyone charges.
795558
The movie is simplified in the way that  the world = USA. Other vise its gets to long and complicated