Which are the different teams in the NBA?
595565
Boston Celtics \nNew Jersey Nets \nNew York Knicks \nPhiladelphia 76ers \nToronto Raptors \nChicago Bulls \nCleveland Cavaliers \nDetroit Pistons \nIndiana Pacers \nMilwaukee Bucks \nAtlanta Hawks \nCharlotte Bobcats \nMiami Heat \nOrlando Magic \nWashington Wizards \nDallas Mavericks \nHouston Rockets \nMemphis Grizzlies \nNew Orleans Hornets \nSan Antonio Spurs \nDenver Nuggets \nMinnesota Timberwolves \nPortland Trail Blazers \nSeattle SuperSonics \nUtah Jazz \nGolden State Warriors \nLos Angeles Clippers \nLos Angeles Lakers \nPhoenix Suns \nSacramento Kings \n\nIf you want the teams by division and conference, visit this website.
353435
Good team list I would add\n\nBaseball: NY Mets, Boston Red Sox\nBasketball: Boston Celtics, Chicago Bulls\nSoccer: Manchester United
505890
Sixteen teams in the NBA play in the post-season.  Eight teams are in each conference (Eastern and Western), and the top teams in each conference make it into the playoffs.  In the first round, the top teams play the lower teams (i.e. the 1st v. 8th, 2nd v. 7th, etc.) in each conference.  Each series (between two teams) continues until a team wins four games in the series (e.g. the 1st-place team in the Eastern Conference wins four games against the 8th-seed).  Then this continues into the semi-finals with the same pattern (i.e. the lowest-ranked remaining teams play the highest-ranked remaining teams and a series ends when one team in the series wins four games).  Then there's the conference semi-finals, where the remaining teams in each conference play until one team wins four games.  Then the remaining two teams in the NBA playoffs play for the championship, when one team wins four games in the series.
51699
Go here for all the info you need:\n\nhttp://www.nba.com/allstar2006/
463763
I don't follow the NBA as much as I did a couple years ago, but my picks:\n\n1) Clippers- They have the youth and the experience with veterans. Really deep, all they need is time and determination.\n\n2) Warriors- Jason Richardson and Baron Davis are explosive. Now who else? The Warriors started powerful then died down as the season progressed. They need more talent and a leader who actually cares about the championship.\n\n3) Lakers- Kobe scores a million. Need I say more? Half of this team cares about how their stats look so they can get a new contract worth millions. Right now, the Lakers have no hope. They chose to Kobe instead of Shaq and this is the result they are going to get.\n\n4) Sacramento- This team does look like a mess. But who knows? This could be a surprise. The team that was a favorite to win the West three years ago is almost gone. But Mike Bibby, one of the strongest leaders, still remains. All thats needed now is to decide what direction they want to go to.\n\n-Way2Determined
529023
All time:\n\nStarters:\nPG - Magic Johnson\nSG - James Worthy\nSF - Elgin Baylor\nPF - Larry Bird\nC  - Wilt Chamberlain\n\nBench: Michael Jordon, Bill Russel, Kareem Abdul Jabar, Oscar Robinson, Charles Barkley, John Stockton, John Stockton\n\nActive:\n\nStarters:\nPG - Allen Iverson\nSG - Kobe Bryant\nSF - LeBron James\nPF - Kevin Garnett\nC  - Yao Ming\n\nBench:\nShawn Marion, Elton Brand, Dirk Nowitzki, Dwyane Wade, Paul Pierce, Gilbert Arenas, Marcus Camby\n\nCoach: Phil Jackson\n\nWinner: Active in quadruapale overtime.
1151584
Personally, I vote for the Detroit Pistons, but if you look a the NBA top ten teams list, the Chicago Bulls had two outstanding teams at a time when the competition was greater:\n\n1964-65 Boston Celtics  62 - 18  (.775) \n\n1966-67 Philadelphia 76ers 68 - 13  (.840)  \n  \n1969-70 New York Knicks  60 - 22  (.732)  \n  \n1971-72 L.A. Lakers  69 - 13  (.841)  \n\n1982-83 Philadelphia 76ers 65 - 17  (.793)  \n  \n1985-86 Boston Celtics  67 - 15  (.817)  \n\n1986-87 L.A. Lakers  65 - 17  (.793)  \n  \n1988-89 Detroit Pistons  63 - 19  (.768)  \n\n1991-92 Chicago Bulls  67 - 15  (.817)  \n\n1995-96 Chicago Bulls  72 - 10  (.878)
160144
for what team or are you talking about the entire league?  If the later, then I would recommend http://www.nba.com or you can check each team.
473456
1996-Bulls\n1997-Bulls\n1998-Bulls\n1999-Spurs\n2000-Lakers\n2001-Lakers\n2002-Lakers\n2003-Spurs\n2004-Pistons\n2005-Spurs
363519
Baseball,Football,basketball
1103386
1 Andrea Bargnani PF Toronto Raptors Italy\n\n2 LaMarcus Aldridge PF Chicago Bulls Texas\n\n3 Adam Morrison SF Charlotte Bobcats Gonzaga\n\n4 Tyrus Thoms PF Portland Trail Blazer  LSU\n\n5 Shelden Williams PF/C Atlanta Hawks  Duke\n\n6 Rudy Gay SF Minnesota Timberwolves Connecticut\n\n7 Marcus Williams PG Boston Celtics Connecticut\n\n8 Randy Foye PG Houston Rockets Villanova\n\n9 Rodney Carney SF Golden State Warriors Memphis\n\n10 Patrick O’Bryant C Seattle SuperSonics Bradley
202347
miami heat\nUtah Jazz\nOralndo Magic\nPhoenix Mercury\nIndiana Fever\nNew York Liberty
915568
Yes there is. The New Jersey Nets. Soon they will become the New York Nets if they make the deal. If you want to look them up, go to www.nba.com
212983
http://www.nba.com/history/\n\nYou can see all sorts of things from NBA history on this site.
689854
San Antonio\nLos Angeles\n\nTwo different cities.\n\nThe Spurs play in San Antonio.\nThe Clippers and the Lakers play in Los Angeles.
519802
2002 -- Los Angeles Lakers\n2003 -- San Antonio Spurs\n2004 -- Detroit Pistons
678308
The Spurs. The Pistons are very good and play like the Spurs(all D,all the time) but they don't have dominant MVP player like Duncan. Plus Parker has stepped up his game. And you can never count Ginobili out. Bruce Bowen can slow down any opposing teams top player,Oh don't forget that they have Robert Horry just waiting to pull out another game winner.\nThe Spurs have way too much depth to be messed with and if you saw sundays game, they are already on thier way to taking care of the Mavs.