What happened after Martin Luther posted the 95 theses?
603966
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/95_Theses\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther
1111036
Yeah I read it and followed it for about a day. I don't know what's the outcome though. Internet justice is great though... in small doses.
1080143
The good archbishop was insane while he was alive -- I expect nothing other from his followers. Hopefully the church will liberalize before there is none left.\n\nReynolds Jones\nhttp://www.rebuff.org
667158
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!\n\nYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!!\n\nWhat a great new idea!  Christ spoke to abandon organization and temples!  He pretended to be the messiah to steer people away from the status quo.  He sacrificed himself to show them they were fooled!!!  And cried out that God had forsaken him!!!!  So they would KNOW!  The apostles simply capitalized on his fame, after the heat died off.  Turned him into an icon of what he tried to destroy...the Bible.
622791
i thought he quit\n\njust remember every time some one quotes a bible without telling you how they feel about it they are simply cutting and pasteing a document that has undergone changes by man from copy to copy \nthe last page of revelations in the king james version was actually a translation from a greek translation in 1611 of a latin version from the greek but from a greek copy,\nunlike the rest which was all from the greek new testement that had been publishes in 1520 or so\nthe old testement pretty much has been the same since the dead sea scrolls\n\nso dont trouble yourself over a christian troll who cuts and pastes
494491
I can help you just go to... \nhttp://www.mrburrell.com/atc_textbook/HMSS%20Files/Chapter%2013/Chapter%2013-Lesson%202.htm\n\nit will tell u lots about Martin Luther!
639051
Yes there are. The Christian reconstructionists are post. Also  the A-mill's are to a degree post-mill in that we believe the 1000 years are from Christs Ascension till His return and then the "Rapture". \nRousas John Rushdoony, Cornelius Van Til
237322
Dig here:\nhttp://www.luth.se/luth/present/sweden/history/
411189
http://www.lib.lsu.edu/hum/mlk/srs216.html\n\nlsu list no pledges.
692379
Though I would disagree with the statement as written, what it means is as follows:\n\nDuring a period of church history known as The Protestant Reformation, the Lutheran Church as we know it broke away from The Roman Catholic Church.  A fellow by the name of Martin Luther (not to be confused with the more recent activist Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr.) had famously nailed 95 theses to the door of the church.  These theses were intellectual challenges of certain church practices and dogma.  While this may sound like a bold move, in truth there was little all that flamboyant about it.  Church doors in that place and time were also used as community bulletin boards and many people nailed notices and documents to them the way we post bills in urban areas today.  The 95 theses were little more than 95 topics of discussion for debate he'd hoped to bring attention to.  Martin Luther never had the notion of beginning a new form of the Christian religion.\n\nPerhaps the most noteworthy of the questions dealt with the then Roman Catholic Church practice of selling indulgences.  This was a transitive notion that depending on where one was either got enforced as an abuse to a large degree or got used as a quick little means of acceptance.  That's to say that people who paid the church money got absolution for sins from clergy right away, something Roman Catholics believe is necessary to enter the kingdom of heaven.  It was a practice that dated back hundreds of years in different forms and that segregated those who could pay from those who could not as if sin was a matter of barter.  Martin Luther wished to debate the practice, perhaps even eliminate it.\n\nWell, having gone so strictly against church policy, the simple questions turned into a grandiose argument that sent ripples through the Christian world without end.  The church was just too powerful to fight.  Martin Luther received the brunt of the fallout.  However, it wasn't until an almost unrelated incident, years later, when a reigning Pope excommunicated the entire nation of Germany from the church, that the people there rose up and basically said, "Hey, we don't need your church, we can follow the teachings of this guy over here, Martin Luther."  All of a sudden Luther's questions and assertions had followers.  They built their own churches, patterned after what they knew from Roman Catholicism.  They acquired their own clergy and a few practices that differed slightly from RC but ultimately fell in line with what Martin Luther had pointed out.  Though not the Protestant religion, Lutherans had much to do with the protestant movement (Protestant Reformation), a second schism away from the church after the Great Schism had divided the RC church into Eastern and Western centuries earlier..\n\nAttending a Lutheran church ceremony differs little from a Roman Catholic ceremony in the same season.  There are usually fewer images of Christ and saints, prefering a simple cross and a greater focus on the WORD.  Roman Catholics recognize seven practices as sacraments while Lutherans recognize only five.  Many of the songs are exactly the same, but sung to different tunes.  The Lutheran hierarchy goes up to bishops or so while the Roman Catholic hierarchy extends all the way to the Pope.  Lutheran churches tend to be a little smaller.  Roman Catholics traditionally go to Confession in a dark and quiet private booth called a Confessional while Lutherans tend to simply confess all their sins in a single, common sentence during part of the ceremony.  Both believe in pretty much the same versions of Christ's story and both have similar formats of services.  There’s an academic question over transubstantiation, but one of little note to a person practicing neither religion.\n\nIn recent years, post Vatican II, the similarities between the two have gotten even closer to the naked eye.  That's to say that the Roman Catholic Church has extended c
579533
I don't know any good ones specifically but Wikkipedia would be good. Some slaves were allowed to go to church long as there was a sheriff outside the window, making sure the pastor didn't talk abuot freedom or something. Hope this helps! Good luck on your paper.
554746
Sorry, I just think it's not true.  Jesus had a good message.  Martin Luther King had a better one.  I don't believe in supernatural things.
458237
Martin Luther, the founder of the Lutheran religion, was German.  Martin Luther King, Jr., the civil rights advocate, was American.  Sheesh!
960462
http://www.959theranch.com/news/?news_id=151
620785
Soon Check here:\nhttp://www.messengernews.net/top_stories_full.asp?3474
487931
http://www.illc.uva.nl/dip/past-lectures/dip100904.pdf
166270
I was on my way to bed and stumbled across this question.\nHere's the answer but you must look it up yourself, because I'm tired of typing tonight, eastern time 12:27 a.m.\nNumbers 12 read the whole chpt. about Moses and his ethiopian wife. What God did to those who opposed. Good night! SOT-\n\nEdit: Oh, I am a christian and married to a german man (white) I'm black!