What is the difference in a AMD XP 2800 and a 2800+....?
612217
Yep absolutely nothing.\nNow if you want the difference between an AMD XP 2800+ and a AMD Athlon 64 2800+. This will be a big difference.\nAMD 64 is newer technology, it's faster and needs different computer equipment.
88314
Opteron are excellent processors...especially the 64bit models.   Of course they are not as good as the XP models but they are not slow by any means.  Yes they work great the the Nvidia type cards...make sure you have a good MB.
659694
there is a big difference. after being unlocked, the 6800 has twice as many vertical rendering units, it also has a better gpu and more shaders. The 6800 is much better, and with RivaTuner (www.3dguru.com) you can make a 6800 equal to a 6800ultra/6800GT.
452202
The new Intel Duo-something. I have an AMD processor in this one though and it seems to be pretty fast.
907856
Of those two, get the one from tigerdirect. It's factory overclocked by default. (590MHz core. The newegg one is running 560MHz core.)\n\nIt won't make a world of difference, but it's cheaper and will spit out 4-5FPS more.
271759
it would be AthlonXP  2300+
844304
3D MARK 2006/7 , PC BENCHMARK 2006/7 , TUNE UP UTILITIES 2006/7 , ETC...................  I DON'T REMEMBER NOW !            \nNOTE : YOUR COMPUTER MAY NOT RESPOND FOR HOURS OR IT MAY HANG ,BUT DONT BE AFRAID . IT WILL TAKE A GOOD EXAMINATION OF YOUR COMPUTER .           "ROBIN"
957699
Run dxdiag. It should tell you about the RAM, CPU, OS(and build), and the DirectX version.
61706
most likely that you have a computer with a Genuine Intel processor\n\nx86 refers to the intel 80286 processor family that is used in the PC. The other CPU manufacturer is AMD.\n\ni leave a table with cpu speed
392006
I believe the fastest Athlon XP was the 3200+ before they started with the Athlon FX and 64.  I may be mistaken.  Depending on your motherboard, your system may not be compatible with this processor.  If you are running an Athlon XP 1800+, for example, the highest you can upgrade to is the 2200+.  After that, the chips were using different micron technology that will not work with the older socket.  The 2800+ that I have is upgradeable to 3200+, but it's not really worth it because the speed boost will be insignificant.
221377
go to this web site and you can read there all the stuff about Intel and AMD CPUs and a lot of comparisons.\nhttp://techreport.com/reviews/page.x?pg=processors
620922
The Athlon XP is a socket A cpu.  It is not made with sse2 or sse3.  The 3000+ is the 2nd fastest socket a  only the 3200+ is faster and would not be worth the cost of the upgrade, not enough performance difference to justify it.  \nThe Turion is the new mobile chip based on socket 754.  754 is on it's way out as socket 939 is the current AMD standard.  \nThe only way you will be able to upgrade would be to install a new mobo and chip.  Odds are your memory would be fine as 754 and 939 both use DDR.  Both 754 and 939 mobos can use AGP video cards, just make sure that you don't accidently buy a pci-express board if you intend to re-use your video card.  PCI-express is replacing AGP and is evidently the future of video cards.
1132425
Actually, the number 3500+ is a relative rating that compares AMD to its competitor Intel. 3500+ means that it performs relative to a Pentium4 at 3.5 GHz. The architecture of the AMD cpu allows it to perform faster at lower clock speeds than intel processors, although that is not necesarily better. The current maximums of literal clock speeds is about 3.5GHz or 4GHz when overclocked. This literal speed has not been surpassed because of the amount of heat that the cpu generates, therefore companies have been modifying data pipelines and creating dual core cpus to get better performance. The real speed of your computer is still a balance between all components, so as sockets upgrade and architecture changes to better accomadate faster ram and hard drive speeds and real support of 64bit computing is created, performance can still increase while cpu clock speeds can't be raised.
911575
NO Xp Pro is probably the best os you can get currently but why are you changing to a Athlon? a intel pentium processor is better than a athlon but its your choice just a suggestion.\n\nHope i helped
704645
http://www.systemshootouts.org/shootouts/laptop/2006/0424_lt2800.html\n\nYou can make your own decision by looking at the comparison\nthe shootout did.
908329
you posted in wrong section\n\nthe e6300 is a desktop processor\n\n> yes, its good, not awesome\n1.86 ghz, 1066 mhz fsb, 2 mb l2 cache\n\nthe e6400 is 2.13 ghz, 1066 mhz fsb, 2 mb l2 cache\n\nthe e6600, e6700 have higher clock speeds, but that's not all, their l2 cache is an awesome 4 mb\n\nas for the notebook core 2 duo series from intel,\nthe t7x00 is awesome, featuring 4 mb l2 cache !
975831
Not, it's no equivalent, but I don't think it would make that much difference.  You're going to pay more for the Intel, but the AMD is probably just fine.