Does the following use proper grammar?
596721
Hmmm...no. It's not a sentence, so it's not clear what rules of grammar apply, but I don't think "a symbol" can be taken to refer grammatically to "burn their underpants"--so that makes the underpants themselves a symbol of throwing off their matriachal oppressors. You might want "to represent throwing off..."\n\nI am a matriarchal supporter but that doesn't make me any less a grammar queen.
493476
I have the one cited below. It's excellent for reference, but not for methodical teaching of grammar.\n\nPrentice Hall Reference Guide to Grammar and Usage -- by Muriel Harris
912999
Because the sentence structure police will get you. But really as long as it is in informal conversation it is ok. In business documents or something for school it better be correct.
183309
You should get grammar check...
896262
Grammatically, they're both correct.\n\nIf you're using this sentence in some kind of composition, your biggest problem is that the sentence has an inconsistent tone. The middle of the sentence has the sophisticated "atypical dialects," while the beginning and end are much more conversational and less descriptive.\n\nBut if you're asking me to pick, I would say the second.
575719
Your statement and grammar awnsers that question
828112
Absolutely. I may only be 16, but I detest incorrect grammar. Why must anyone have an excuse for it? How can anyone misuse a little mark (the apostrophe)? Are they so stupid as to be outsmarted by the apostrophe and the simple rules that come with its use? I must admit that correct grammar is not taught properly (in my school, at least) at GCSE level. The only time I have come across a grammar lesson was for coursework requiring it! It isn't just you; I have noticed the decline in the use of the apostrophe, the semicolon, the colon and even the full stop! It's time we put an end to this and stand up against poor punctuation, grim grammar and substandard spelling. One area of debate, however, is that of the serial comma. . . I don't use it. . .
1144948
by learning proper grammer
118781
one about correct comma placement?
582597
what are you are talking about?? nice grammar.
59532
Can you be more specific in plain english. Your grammar is horrible.
772475
That is correct English, do not try to change it, just remember it, English is a majority rule language, and you are in a definite minority, so, tough luck, if you want to change English grammar rules keep using it and if it gets accepted, well done, till then, tough
747498
Do you need to learn English and rephrase your question so it makes sense?\n\nThe answer is yes.
68251
I think your avatar works pretty well for the purpose.  Your grammar backs it up.
587800
Please spell check and grammar check.
642370
Why are you asking this on the internet? And why can't you use proper grammar? "Do thur yahoo gotsd any... uh.. yur msn2go, eh? Er.. no, well anywho.. the .. nevermind." READ A BOOK!\n\n\nEdit:\nListen to me... I'm right... learn proper grammar, it is very useful no matter what other people say *wink*
1183309
No. It is incorrect. The case of who (nominative) and whom (objective) is ALWAYS determined by the way it functions in a relative clause when it begins the clause.\n\nTo illustrate: "(who, whom) service government servants" is the subordinate adjective clause. You will need who because it functions as the subject of the verb service within the clause, and the subject is always in the nominative case.\n\nNote: the subject of the sentence is We and the verb is Are.\n\nI hope this helps!!