What was better, the old WWF or the old WCW?
607045
Vince McMahon did a great job of marketing the WWF and he gave us a great wrestling organization that millions have been able to watch and enjoy.  The WCW was run poorly but they had the best talent as they came out of the NWA.  If the WWF had Sting, Rick Flair, The Steiners, and The Road Warriors back when each was in their prime, the WWF would have been twice the organization it was.  Just imagine those great WCW wrestlers with Hogan, Undertaker, Austin, Rock, Michaels, and the other WWF talent.
397597
The Ultimate Warrior was a great wrestler, crazy perhaps but good, the WWF was OK when it was around
616213
Well not surprised so many seem to answer the latest ones, proably never saw the older ones. The best match had to be Hogan vs. Andre the Giant. It is what MADE Hulk Hogan as well as proably one of the biggest things that happened to Wrestling. When Hogan put down the Giant and took the Title it was the passing of the flame. Keep in mind the Giant LET him win, as almost no one at that time could actually beat Andre. He was too big and too powerful. So when Hulk Hogan won it was to pass the flame and give Hulk Hogan a name. He then used that name to make the WWF a huge organization.
830937
I AM A REAL WRESTLING FAN MY FATHER , MY BROTHERS AND FREINDS SHOWED ME WHAT WRESTLING SHOULD BE. I STARTED WATCHING SINCE 1984 AND NOW IT 2006 I SEEN GOOD FEDS GO DOWN LIKE AWA, WCCW, WCW, ECW AND COUNTLESS OTHERS . THAT MADE WRESTING BE WHAT IT IS . VINCE MAY OF MADE IT MAIN STREAM WITH HOGAN . BUT LATELY WWE SUCKS AND THE TALENT IN TNA IS GETTING BETTER EVERY WEEK AND THE MATCHES ARE WORTH ORDERING ON PAY PER VIEW . AND TNA EVENTS GIVE ME THE RUSH I BEEN LOOKING FOR !!!! TNA TNA TNA !!!!!!!!
1145271
It won't be the ECW we all remember; Vince will turn it into a developmental territory so you'll see guys from OVW join it. The original ECW stars will be there at first to make the new guys look good. Vince basically wants to do to ECW what he did to WCW - book its inferiority to WWE.
811527
no smackdown was pose to be wcw but all the wcw big names didnt sign with the wwe until after 2002 after smackdown came\n i see wat u mean but fridy night wcw
986252
wcw was very low budget and often ridiculed, where as everyone loved wf.\n\nThey've mixed the good with the bad to make it not so good!
459496
Neither. WWE is too much of a soap. TNA is a bit better but if you are looking for technical skills with no flashing lights and 'biggin' it all up, then you want World of Sport
824150
ECW original (1996 to 2001) beats the hell out of anything WWF/E has done since 1989.\n\nRing Of Honor (2002 to 2006) is superior to both of them, however, by leaps and bounds.
1110363
Best group...4 Horsemen, hands down. They OWNED the old NWA/WCW promotion and put WCW on the map to a point where Ted Turner ended up buying it and almost put WWE out of business.\n\nMost entertaining group....Degeneration X. Great storylines, fun characters, and the guys were actually enjoying themselves.\n\nMost overrated group...NWO. A combo of overacting and trying way to hard to be bad...they ended up just being a caricature.
814535
there wrestlers have more abilities an talent ? .. ALOT of TNA wrestlers Are EX wwe, wcw (aka wwe) .. so that dont make sense ..\n\nan better PPV's ? .. I dont recall when the WWE had a Fire at there PPV , an lost time , an matches ... \n\nI'm a fan of Both , but i guess i just dont see it your way.
892777
i highly doubt that Ted Turner would bring WCW back considering all of the competition with WWE, ECW, and TNA now. WCW would not stirve enough and just go bankrupt.  WWE is the ultimate wrestling company
1126041
its not boring...you want boring? watch TNA...cuz WWE is SO NOT boring...i mean WWF (the same thing) was sucha better thing and it was wrestling~~!\n\nbut still wwe has had their problems, but even though, they are the best ever!
93510
Here are some reasons....\n1. The storylines are predictable\n2. They've done the same things over and over again on the Free TV Shows...\n3. Everything is built so you pay $35 to watch the monthly PPVs.\n4. There are too many PPVs\n5. Wrestling has lost its edge compared to 6-7 years ago when it became popular again.  Back then people tuned it because it was unpredictable and you didn't know what was going to happen next.\n6. Boring characters, everyone goes by their name and they are just average men, whereas there aren't any new characters or character development.\n7. Not a lot of new young talent, we're seeing the same old guys over and over again.  Anyone new that they bring in is someone who hasn't wresteled in 10 years or was from WCW.\n8. The business has lost touch with what the fans want and is becomming more and more like WCW.\n9. It's becoming more like WCW and less like ECW.
1083676
The CORRECT answer is, it depends onwhat style of wrestling you like. If you like a balance of wrestling, characters, feuds and storylines, then WWE is better. If you like more hardcore style wrestling with less rules and more fighting, then ECW is the way to go. Hope this answered your question.
909034
wwe has more flash and drags stuff out , tna has better matches, more high flyin' and puts more in an hour than wwe does in 2.
851947
wat kind of wwe do u wacth. the 5-9 year old version. lol.