Why did the DOD re-release an already leaked tape of the flight hitting the Pentagon?
609512
Wars going bad for them and they are losing support. Even from those who were all gung ho just last year. The public is saying 'it's a mess and we need to take care of ourselves first.' And 'this is another vietnam.' years and years if gurilla insurgents that continue to recruit with no end in sight. \n\nThey release the tape to remind us all why we're there. And maintain support for the war. A guy from saudi arabia, based in the sudan, is supposedly behind an attack and was maybe hiding in Afgahnistan so it's obvious that we need to free Iraq. \n\nThey didn't release the other two because we've still got years to go. Thier saving those for four more years till you need another reminder. \n\nThe medias been shut out of the loop unless they support the administration and have given up trying to get anything from them. The media who supports him is fine with using journalism to promote the national interest.
458023
plane plane plane plane , I checked out the video here , if you repeat something enough times,enough time goes by.... It was very interesting well worded but incorrect. All the statements were taken out of context. I have read the full conversations with living victims and witnesses, go over your memory of the day,a plane hit . Some of the photos here were taken days,weeks later. The truth is a plane hit with real people on it,real names faces,not a missile. What is real scary? It has been 60+ years since the concentration camps, some have been saying this documented horror never happened. We have something similar here but with misinformation and considerably sooner. Sometimes a duck is just a duck. This nightmare had an author and it was not the US government,nor most of its Muslim citizens,Israel,or a missile, unless you include an airplane used as a missile.\nPS what would really settle every ones mind would be to release the videos. I understand why they can't yet but in time it would be wise, it will end this insult and conjecture.
163223
The motive would be to declare martial law.\n***\nThe plane intended to hit the Capitol was shot down before it hit it's target.  (I'm going off of the theories that I am familiar with.)  Signals were crossed and the plane was shot down early.  This, in turn, made for a wonderful story, as the plane was determined crashed because the brave souls on the flight stood up to their highjackers.  Had that plane hit the Capitol, the whole of D.C. would have been crippled and George W. Bush would have had an indisputable reason to declare martial law.\n***\nI don't have the movie memorized.  If you need to know about these conspiracies, please watch one of the films dedicated to the topic, or read a book based on the same.  The plane didn't hit (according to the theories I am familiar with) because the military plane sent to target it misinterpreted the orders.  Their plan did not go 100% accordingly, obviously.  The motive was there, the means were there, the actual act got muffed due to a lack of interpretation on the pilot's part.  (PLEASE do not think that I am holding these happenings as truth, I am just filling you in on all that I've watched, read, and heard on the radio.)\n***\nDid you ask just to ridicule?  I thought that this was a debate forum of sorts, not a free-for-all insult fest.
1160864
lucky2bealive, I don't want to disagree with you but I don't believe you are going to find anywhere in the historical records that Bin Laden claimed responsibility for the 9/11 bombings. What he has done is praise the matyrs of that event. However, there would be more clarity and the issue can be put to bed finally if the government gave us the names of all the people that died in the various events. Where are the planes that crashed? Do you really believe that a building like the Pentagon would have cameras that are intermittent and take pictures every 7/8 seconds. Come.. Come. We are talking about the most technologically advanced country in the world. Something smells fishy and the stench cannot be dispersed until the Government come clean. Have you ever seen reports of the examination of  the so called crash sites?
1120779
This answer is in reply to rliedtky's answer to this question.   Listen.  I dont care how many people you have claiming there was a 757 or a small plane, or a missle...  it DOESNT MATTER.  Eye witness accounts are all going to be different regardless of what actually happened.  It's a version of the truth.\n\nAnd the truth we may never know, but one thing we DO KNOW is .... well it was NOT a 757 like our government said it was.  The eyewitness accounts you speak of (which I have never heard of before) claim the "757" hit its left wing on the ground and then slammed into the pentagon.  Well, this is just simply impossible.\n\nIf the plane's wing broke off while hitting the ground and then hit the building, and this is why we have a 16ft hole in the pentagon, well then, there would be parts of the wreckage ALL over the grass of the pentagon lawn.  In addition, there would be wreckage to be removed from inside the pentagon.  \n\nThe facts???  \n\n-the pentagon video released to us shows NO EXPLOSION until CONTACT with the plane and the building.  Meaning, a PLANE will NOT hit the ground without making a huge fireball.\n\n-lets say the wind DID break off the plane, and the plane STILL did not touch the grass, how was the hole 16ft wide???  The middle of the plane is 24ft wide and 44ft high.  The other wing would of still been attached to the plane and would of had to hit the building SOMEWHERE!\n\n-WHATEVER hit the pentagon went through 3 walls and 9 feet of steel before coming out the other side, in again, a perfect 16ft wide hole.\n\nNOTE:  There was NO wreckage removed from the pentagon.  NO bodies from people on the plane recovered.  AND TO THIS DAY we still have not been able to see what REALLY hit the pentagon.\n\nIf you have a brain rliedtky, instead of questioning my education on this matter,  you should re evaluate your information sir or ma'am.   And until you are able to see what actually hit the pentagon, you will not be able to answer ANY questions except for the fact that is WAS IMPOSSIBLE for a 757 to of done this damage.\n\n\nI personally feel you along with 90% of america will choose to trust in your faithful government over ANYTHING ELSE because the TRUTH is something you will not be able to accept at this point in time.\n\nI am NOT making ANY money from speaking about this topic.  I am doing this because I REALLY CARE and LOVE my country, and I feel we need to re-think our political values on this nation.  Our government had any and EVERY thing to do with 9/11 and people need to know ALL of the facts, not just what mainstream media and the goverment are speaking of.\n\nAfterall, it's impossible for ANYONE to make and educated decision on ANYTHING without knowing ALL OF THE INFORMATION.  \n\nI spend 40-50 hours a WEEK researching this material for my show, and I promise, if i felt it was not SOLID FACTS, I would not report it, NOR would my staff allow me to do so.\n\nThank you for reading,\n\nJoshua Fourrier\nwww.AirAzonaRadio.com\njosh@airazonaradio.com
621955
Because it was NOT a plane but a missile which hit the Pentagon.\nFlight 77 did not even exist
970803
You did not know? I am not surprised; it is classified information.\nDon't tell anybody else, but I have it on authority that all is revealed in this highly confidential document:\nwww.abovetopsecret.com/forum\n/thread181168/pg1
1124887
How about you do some more research, and then tell us what YOU think.  A little common sense will get you thinking the right way.  Good luck.\n\nhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html\nhttp://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html\nhttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/05/911_documentary_removed/\nhttp://wtc.nist.gov/\nhttp://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html\nhttp://911myths.com/
412944
Yea it's Conspiracy, If U have lime wire then Search about 9-11 Conspiracy on Movie. U'll find a Program over there Show U that there was No plain Hit the Pentagon & They Just Say So, & The Plain which Hit the two Building had A Missle on Them ... There Is No Boing Have Missle & There is No Missile even in Cargo plain. & How G.W.Bush told the PPL that He open the TV & watched they show the First Plain hit the Building & They Didn't Capture that one by News Cam & they got it from someone who was capture a fire beside that Building ... Alot U going to Discover on that Movie. To be sure it's the Movie ... Just write on Lime Wire Video search " 911 Conspiracy " & Then find the Movie which have size 498 MB. Then Download it & U'll discover that The Government of USA did Allllllllllllllllll.
826745
what i want to know is how did these hijackers infiltrate the pentagon and get them to turn of there defences . i is supposed  to be one of the most secure buildings in the world . there must have been more than one camera picking the pictures of the so called planes if i walk to my local shops i am picked by over 1 hundred cameras i live in a small town in England . it happened in Washington on of the most important city's in the whole world. its because American people a so gullible they can sell this lie to them. whats next.
399832
Try this link. It will reveal and answer a lot of questions you may have.\n\nhttp://fpiarticle.blogspot.com/2006/04/911-in-plane-site.html\n\nI dont believe a plane crashed into the pentagon. Flight 93 was made up. The planes that crashed into the WTC's were not commercial airlines. There is no proof! With all the video footage... you never really see the commercial logos. It's all bogus.\n\nThink about it. Why would the government do this? To create FEAR! This is the new era. There is no more cold war. No more bad super power. So where does the government turn for war? To an invisible word called "Terrorist". The war on terrorism is only a few words. \n\nFear makes me people more controllable. They spend more. They submit to anything that will protect them. And in exchange for it all is our freedom.
1087787
I may not be the brightest bulb on the string, but there are two simple questions that haven't been answered to my satisfaction. \n\nThe first, is had anyone seen the plane as it was headed for the Pentagon? Specifically, anyone on the freeway or nearby roads? Anyone from the nearby hotel? A low flying plane of that size would have made tremendous noise that should have made at least one person look up. I don't remember any stories or news accounts of at least one witness who would be eager to be on TV and talk about such an experience.\n\nSecondly, and I would think this is most important, the quote of the gas station attendant who says the FBI was there "in minutes after the crash" to grab the surveillance tapes. I do need the gentleman's exact definition of minutes, since the difference between two or three, as opposed to 20 or 30 would make or break the argument for conspiracy. I would fully expect the FBI to gather every piece of evidence available in the quickest manner, since at the time of the crash, the "who dunnit" list was supposedly wide open. However, if agents were gathering information literally minutes after the crash, that would raise and wave wildly every red flag. \n\nEven if the argument was made that the Pentagon was a foreseeable target, and agents were in place, why weren't non-essential employees in the Pentagon directed to areas of safety? \n\nThe Secretary of Defense was in the building, during a national emergency. If it was prudent to have FBI agents at the ready to seize video of an air assault on the Pentagon from a gas station, why was the Secretary, 6th in line to the throne, left to sit in his office, venerable to attack?  \n\nDedication to office? Nope...I just don't see that happening. Job and status guaranteed for 8 years? Might have been a gamble he offered to take...\n\nIt would explain why he didn't fall on his sword and resign, at the very least, to uphold the honor that is expected of anyone in command of the military after so many false claims of easy victory in Iraq.
1153558
Stuff about 9/11 sounds interesting and there are many things that has not been clarified by our government. We can doubt what they do and I do not believe everything the politicians says. The video clip does not have many solid evidence and the creator is not credible enough.
560700
Anyone that has ever been interested, this is the same old boring video that has been out forever on the net.  It is NOT one of the two high-speed or high-resolution videos confiscated from both a nearby gas station and the roof of a nearby hotel by the FBI.\n\nThough Fox News is saying that this now "explains everything, go back to bed folks", it answers absolutely zero real questions about 9/11.\n\nThe families of the victims of 9/11 gave a list of 263 pertinent questions to the 9/11 Commission.  They received clear answers to just 17.  They need to know what happened to their loved ones, and we as Americans deserve the truth.
29237
This is a very true possibility because there is actual proof of the government hiding what happend on that day... if you recall a plane had also hit the pentagon as well as the towers right... negative there was no plane wreckage at that site. what had actualy hit it was a missle. and the government wants us to believe that it was a plan to not cause panic.
1136343
It wasn't.  Please read:\n\nhttp://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
460707
ok i've watched loose change four times or so now, and spent way too much time reading on various websites, they make some convincing points...but then they ignore alot of stuff as well...like common sense.\n\ncould there be some conspiracy behind 911? yes there could be. is it these theories that are popularly being advanced currently on the web...no\n\nstart at the end and work your way forward: the point of 911 was to destroy some buildings.  there are easier ways for the government to pull this off than to.\nsecretly swap planes in the air for non-passenger drone places, fly two of them into buildings, which they already rigged with additional explosives, secretly land the planes, secretly kill the passengers, fake a plane crash at one location, get voice samples from passengers to load into a computer to produce fake phone calls to loved ones with, then swap one plane for a missle (never mind that some claim this was a smaller drone plane) fire it into the pentagon, get 100 or so people to claim they saw a plane(this is ignored by loose change which uses two of the four people that claimed to not have seen a plane) then run around real fast knocking over the light poles etc...loose change claims a plane couldn't knock over those lamp poles that way, but never tries to explain how they were knocked over, if we assume that not all 100+ witnesses were cia plants, then we have to wonder why no one went, "and there these guys ran around loosening all the bolts on those lamps and pushed them over and ran off! dam kids!"\n\nloose change and other sources also use alot of broadcasts from very early after the attacks took place during which there was alot of confusion about what happened, live news especially while something is happening doesn't always get things 100% correct and uses alot of speculation to fill in time while they figure things out.\n\nloud thuds of things like, say upper floors falling into lower ones, could no doubt sound very much like other explosions going off.\n\nthe list goes on and on, but this post is getting rather long.\n\nok so lets face it, thats one complicated plan to bring down some buildings.  you could just blow them up, blame who ever you wanted to, say you are investigating how security could have been breached to such an extent, and leave it at that.\n\nits just too complicated of a conspiracy, that would take way way too many people to keep their mouths shut.