It is written that: " In the beginning was the Word ....(is) the Word a product of Thought or whatev U think?
611439
To say that there was a word means that thought went into it.  Sounds logical to me.  The power of the spoken word is, then, immense.  The lord speaks of the tongue as a double-edged sword, and also, that we will be held accountable for every word that we utter.  This is very sobering.\n"In the beginning was the word" implies that the "word" is what brought us into being.\n\n"Man cannot live on bread alone, but on every WORD that comes from the mouth of God"  Interesting.
712363
It is not a sentence...\n\nBeneath the noted universal concerns there lies a distinctive world view.\n\n Or better yet use a semi colon after the word preceeding but ..then replacing it with however and a comma...like this \n\n" ; however, beneath these universal concerns there lies a distinctive worldview."
453724
First one must think before one writes. Thinking could also be subconscious and one writes automatically. This style of writing was made famous by the Irish novelist James Joyce. Since writing is a form of action, there needs to be a thought to start the writing engine.
970369
"I think therefore I am." Descarte was trying to start from what was indesputable, & procede to the less certain aspects of knowledge.\n\nThe ability to think was to Descarte proof that we actually existed. Descarte was deeply confused. Thinking is one of many things we DO, as well as breath, act, sense, emote, remember, imagine, or meditate. If we stop thinking, what happens? Nothing except our mind grows quiet & somewhat more peaceful for a while. We still are, thinking or not at all. If we stop breathing, we die. Wikijo would have said " I breath, therefore I am." It would have made more sense.\n\nI hope this helps.\n\n;-)
29968
In the beginning was the Word.  And the Word was with God, and the Word was God.  He was with God in the beginning.  John 1:1&2
869039
Thoughts become things
1150364
it means.."at first glance"...
81788
MEDITATION I.\n\nOF THE THINGS OF WHICH WE MAY DOUBT.\n\n\n1. SEVERAL years have now elapsed since I first became aware that I had accepted, even from my youth, many false opinions for true, and that consequently what I afterward based on such principles was highly doubtful; and from that time I was convinced of the necessity of undertaking once in my life to rid myself of all the opinions I had adopted, and of commencing anew the work of building from the foundation, if I desired to establish a firm and abiding superstructure in the sciences. But as this enterprise appeared to me to be one of great magnitude, I waited until I had attained an age so mature as to leave me no hope that at any stage of life more advanced I should be better able to execute my design. On this account, I have delayed so long that I should henceforth consider I was doing wrong were I still to consume in deliberation any of the time that now remains for action. To-day, then, since I have opportunely freed my mind from all cares [and am happily disturbed by no passions], and since I am in the secure possession of leisure in a peaceable retirement, I will at length apply myself earnestly and freely to the general overthrow of all my former opinions.[L][F]\n\n2. But, to this end, it will not be necessary for me to show that the wholeof these are false--a point, perhaps, which I shall never reach; but as even now my reason convinces me that I ought not the less carefully to withhold belief from what is not entirely certain and indubitable, than from what is manifestly false, it will be sufficient to justify the rejection of the whole if I shall find in each some ground for doubt. Nor for this purpose will it be necessary even to deal with each belief individually, which would be truly an endless labor; but, as the removal from below of the foundation necessarily involves the downfall of the whole edifice, I will at once approach the criticism of the principles on which all my former beliefs rested.[L][F]\n\n3. All that I have, up to this moment, accepted as possessed of the highest truth and certainty, I received either from or through the senses. I observed, however, that these sometimes misled us; and it is the part of prudence not to place absolute confidence in that by which we have even once been deceived.[L][F]\n\n4. But it may be said, perhaps, that, although the senses occasionally mislead us respecting minute objects, and such as are so far removed from us as to be beyond the reach of close observation, there are yet many other of their informations (presentations), of the truth of which it is manifestly impossible to doubt; as for example, that I am in this place, seated by the fire, clothed in a winter dressing gown, that I hold in my hands this piece of paper, with other intimations of the same nature. But how could I deny that I possess these hands and this body, and withal escape being classed with persons in a state of insanity, whose brains are so disordered and clouded by dark bilious vapors as to cause them pertinaciously to assert that they are monarchs when they are in the greatest poverty; or clothed [in gold] and purple when destitute of any covering; or that their head is made of clay, their body of glass, or that they are gourds? I should certainly be not less insane than they, were I to regulate my procedure according to examples so extravagant.[L][F]\n\n5. Though this be true, I must nevertheless here consider that I am a man, and that, consequently, I am in the habit of sleeping, and representing to myself in dreams those same things, or even sometimes others less probable, which the insane think are presented to them in their waking moments. How often have I dreamt that I was in these familiar circumstances, that I was dressed, and occupied this place by the fire, when I was lying undressed in bed? At the present moment, however, I certainly look upon this paper with eyes wide awake; the head which I now move is not asleep; I e
299656
im thinking what should i think to write an answer to your question on thinking so im thinking whther i should think and think or stop thinking so that thinking doesnot eat my head.if it does so maybe i can never think agaun and if u cant think again my thininkg power will go, so better nit to think and think of doing something reasonable.\nso maybe i need to think of what should i think now so tat i can answer your thinknin question
539710
It means to understand that something is based on reason. Therefore words from the bible were written as known to man from words of "Jesus" and the viewpoint is not exchangeable.
178478
"your thoughts 4 some extra points"\n\nWell, that was what you said, isn't it?  =)  thanks!
641415
At first glance, the thing that jumped out at me was the use of alliteration, which is the repetition of the same first sound or first letter. (perfection of paper, etc). He seems to use this repeatedly.
178525
DO YOU MEAN THOUGHTLESSNESS?
44342
ALL was.  ALL is.  ALL ever shall be.  [The primordial state for which there is no beginning or end]  The ALL spake [Big Bang], and Motion was [Creator], and is, and ever shall be; and being positive [going forth outward], was called He and Him.  The ALL MOTION [created universe] was His speech.\n\nHe said, I AM!  And He comprehended all things, the seen and the unseen.  Nor is there aught in all the universe but what is part of Him.
714726
was it “Kind words do not cost much. Yet they accomplish much.” ?\nIf not there are loads more on here http://en.thinkexist.com/quotation/Kind_words_do_not_cost_much-Yet_they_accomplish/146158.html
158355
i think its is a word the author made up
800740
Now there is a truly original thought!  How refreshing.  I will make that my question to ponder as I go to sleep tonight.\n\nThank you.