why UN and his member r Quite about the warr of iraq.?
610684
You are talking of justice and fairness in UN when US is around.\nNo more kidding.\n\nBy the way the ratio of killings in Iraq is 100 Iraqis versus 1 American.\n\nAnd more scaring/dangerous fact is that it is acceptable to Iraqis and unacceptable to Americans.\n\nCan you imagine the outcome?
927593
The UN is too corrupt to be much good.\nJohn Bolton is standing up to the UN, and trying to improve it.\nThat makes the Democrats mad, and they have taken an oath to get rid of him.\nDemocrats want an UN Ambassador that hates America, as much as they do.
400998
I think you mean Bush does not want the Iraqis to be united in order to control them. This is right, but USA should not be blamed Iraq is made of two major ethnic groups and two major relgious groups and already divided.
755848
War criminals fall under different international laws than other people.  If he was naturalized, then he didn't disclose everything to your government and therefor, he isn't a proper citizen to begin with.
1178389
Oh YES Zarqawi was most certanly affiliated with al Quaida BEFORE the invasion of Iraq. He was in Afghanistan serving as a unti commander at a training camp prior to 9/11. He was wounded by US fire & fled into Iran & then across into SADDAM CONTROLLED northern Iraq, not the Kurdish area covered by the no-fly zone (he would have been killed there). While in Iraq, still prior to the invasion, he went to Bagdad for medical treatment, where his leg was amputated, and he was interviewed by Sadam security/intelligence agents about his experiences fighting the Americans & his intentions in Iraq. He was then granted an asylum visa by the Sadam govt. ALL of this is documented public record & was included in the UN presentation. Later, after the invasion & after he had significantly recovered from his wounds, he got back into the fight by going out on his own & creating an independent terrorist organization of mostly foreign fighters. A short time later, when running low on funds & a PR machine, he affiliated his organization with the al Quaida whom he previously served.
45273
I guess it's real easy to judge since none of you have to be responsible for the entire country. I have a feeling you have trouble managing your own lives. Only the uninformed have a problem with the way he does things. LOOK honestly at the way Saddam treated his people and the say YOU wouldn't want somebody to help you.  REAL NICE
637467
That's wrong..Yall need to give that man some air. He has more to do in his BS life then you would know what to do with. Any how his Sec of Defence is the one killing because he is the adviser of the pres. in war. I don't care if anyone is offened or any thing else.
36575
It is because of BUSH. He is the one cause everyone hates USA. He goes plays god, who the heck does he think he is rushing to Iraq because of WMD, a country can solve its own problem, paying the U.N more money, so the votes go in its favor even when it does something wrong like the Iraq war when there was no WMD, Bush just went there for oil and made up a reason and paid the U.N a lot of money for excusing him.
133808
Saddam was the Baathist party leader in Iraq.  Most Sunni's are Baathist as well.  That is the connection between the two.  Saddam is by no means a religious man.  It was on rare occasion that he even wore Arab garb.  The Sunni's enjoyed most of the perks under his watch.  Most of the army was Sunni, yet most of the Republican Guard were from his home town. These are the people that he trusted the most; these were his most loyal followers, it had nothing to do with religion. His relationship with all other segments of Iraqi society was at best, guarded.  The Kurds would have had his ass in a New York minute, given half the chance.  The Turkman had no particular edge with Saddam, and the Christians just stayed out of his way. The Shiites, particularly those in the south, had strong ties to Iran.  Iran's brand of Islam is predominately Shiite, so Saddam was not particularly friendly to the Shiites.  Saddam ruled with scare tactics and he was pretty effective with them.  He kept every one under control but at a high price.  The mass graves still pop up occasionally!
1002391
Yes. Because he was ratted out by one of his own. And more and more, the Iraqi people are informing on the bloody terrorist insurgents. Iraq has taken another huge step towards being rid of these scum.\n\nGod bless our troops and all those who fight for Iraqi freedom and liberty.
1030557
The stated cause of the invasion of Iraq was because it didn't obey the united nations, why should israel not have to. Oh, I forgot, Israel and the united states are allies and consequently can do whatever it likes to whoever it likes.
440549
the best way to war against someone is to take their humanity away. huns, japs, gukes, ruskies, pinkos, commies, whateveer the iraqis are...all meant to keep them from being people. the stupid masses would never support this or any war without 'the bad guys'. thats why theres so much anti muslim, arab, middle east hatred being bred in our movies, tv, radio, culture & politics. propaganda man.
787717
Interesting way to take your ridiculous viewpoint and shove it down people's throats.\n\nBut let me answer your question with a question of my own. John Bolton has nothing but disdain for the United Nations. Before he was sent up to NY (btw, a request made by Condi Rice because Bolton was such an incompetent boob, she wanted him out of the State Department) he did nothing but mock the UN. So, that being the case, why would he even want to be ambassador to the UN? Would you date someone you hated or live in a town you despised?
860728
Winki Pinki must be at that time of the month so just ignore her. Anyway, to answer your question, war is much needed sometimes but when in comes to the war in Iraq, I tooootally agree with you. They have no inclination of whats going on in the world, look at Rummy how he said France and Germany reminds him of "Old Europe", what a jerk to say suh a thing like that. They are our allies for God sake and not our bitch whores. They have a right to an opinion. This administration has no morals and rides the wave of shoving freedom down everyones throats. Thats why the world has indigestion now and its time to throw out the Necon clan from America.
772005
It's not for the U.S.  \n\nIt's for U.S. oil companies.\n\nBig difference.\n\n\nAnyone who thinks that the decision to attack Hussein and the fact that Iraq sits on the second largest proven reserve of oil in the world had nothing to do with one another is naive.
726005
Sorry I didn't. I didn't know that Shiites and Sunnis hated each other so much and that everybody hated the Kurds. I guess I should have thought about it since there was one once Tito died and Yugoslavia was broken up into its original pieces. Clinton had to send troops to stop the genocide there. Still, the evil that Saddam perpetrated on people should be taken into account of why the Shiites are so irritated. Sunnis got the better deal while he was in charge.
1034476
yes I agree. Why should we give a fuck about Iraq when no one country does and the UN didnt even stand behind us? oh wait I know the answer to this! it wasn't a war to find nuclear weapons Bush JR wanted to finish what Bush SR started. I know A LOT of soldigers in Iraq and they say its bullshit. They don't even know why they're over there anymore... thats reddikulas!!!! We shouldn't step in everytime a country isn't running the way we want them to. How would we like it if a country sent in their troops to us and said hey, we don't like the way your running your country, we're going to make you into a comminust country.... we wouldn't like it just like they don't like it. And give me an f-ing break saying this is a war on terriorism... if that is true why didn't we go for Osama (the PERSON freaking responsible for the attacks on USA) instead of invading Iraq for Bush to finish his daddys war! UGH I can go on and on hehe.