what will be the economical impact on Zimbabwe once Government take over 51 % in the copper mines?
611185
I wouldn't trust the government to take out the trash,hopeless and evil,what can the world do? nothing,too many conflicts already and  the so caled do gooders scream IMPERIALISM any time another country gets involved....copperprices will rise marginally but the people will receive no benifit
190207
Government STABILITY is essential for investment and growth. Many countries learned a hard lesson from investing in the Mid-East when they nationalized everything in sight.\n\nAfrica being a MUSLIM stronghold won't win you any stability investing nor growth either.
212718
dont understand your question ...\ncoca cola are present already in Zimbabwe .. but I assume you are talking something else ...
427799
Metalline Mining Company, which controls the Sierra Mojada District.\n\nhttp://www.metalin.com/zincsilvercopper.html
648801
Drop George Bush a line and tell him they have found unlimited oil reserves in Zimbabwe! :-) That will guarantee Mugabe gets ousted!
721213
Dai TANK payya,\n\nWhat is the community going to do with the money saved? Are they going to invest ( because they might have saved it with some intension to invest it, otherwise why should they save at all) directly. Will the government (if assumed to be present) borrow the funds saved by the community. If foreign trade is incorporated into the story, decline in prices could induce exports and increase income (to producers) or atleast eliminate losses as was given in the question.\n\nWhy did Keynes not the full question( or did i not understand fully)?
812686
It's a sad fact that many African countries that start off as democracies revert to tribalism. Zimbabwe is a extreme example but you'll find Mugabe has his defenders here on Answers. Most of these 'defenders' have of course never been to Zimbabwe and are just spouting someones  propaganda. I hope the RSA doesn't follow this path but of course corruption is rife throughout the country and this often leads to one party states which are the end of democracy.
349707
Yeah... I think you will see movements in that direction for many contenents... the African Union is in talks... but how knows if that will happen.\nI think it would be better for them because no one country has the infastruture to be very competitve in a global economy, but together they could make waves and get some things done
559286
The cost of copper has skyrocketed. As we reach the end of the oil age things are going to get more and more expensive.
314334
It was called Rhodesia while a colony.  And it was the British.\n\nIt's impact was, unfortunately, not as bad as things are now.
682268
The African Government is taking away jobs of white people.  It's time to more out.
157277
The country is still totally controlled by the Communist Party of China, which is the central government.  Individual provinces have their own governments, controlled by party members.\nBut economically, capitalism has been allowed to flourish, bringing prosperity to the country which communism failed to do.  The first people to benefit from this are the Communists - very ironically, the sworn opponents of capitalism!  Hopefully, however, the centralisation of power and national planning will channel this new money the right way.  The government has just announced it's latest 5-year plan for the rural (agricultural) sector (most Chinese are still down on the farm, and poor).  All agricultural taxes have been abolished and many measures will be taken to help the farmers. One wishes them every success in this worthwhile endeavour.
103218
It will become the 51st state, the name will be changed to bushland in honer of the man that freed it from tyrenie, the oil companys will benifit from the laws and decisions of the freely elected govener who by chance ran against his own party. I can't think of anything else. Maybe after we pull out and the civil war happens they will be run by a dictator and develop into a powerful nuclear country.
747400
Invest 70% of your capital in crystal meth, 20% in Government backed energy bonds, 5% in black hashish and 5% in munitions.  That should see you through the rough patches ahead.\n\nGood luck!\n\nP.S. Oh, I forgot.  Invest another 10% in those businesses who advise you how to give 110%,
522811
"By month's end, his government hopes to start redistributing as much as 54,000 square miles of unfarmed land to the poor."\n\nhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/22/AR2006052200750.html
734573
Oil, defense sectors will definately suffer.\n\nAlternative fuels will benefit, such as ADM, GPRE, and others.\n\nOverall though, this is a good thing, because with a balanced government; this will cause regulation-making to become slower, which is better for businesses. Businesses hate change.
1056556
Hmmm. It's time to take our studio audience all the way to Zimbabwe.\n\nNews Reporter (NR): What are the restrictions imposed on your country by the American Democracy and Economic Recovery Act?"\n\nCitizen(C): " I don't know good sir, but I am so hungry and thirsty, could you just give me a taste of your soda I see in your hand?"\n\nNR: "Sir, sir, will you just answer the question?"\n\nC: I am dying from thirst, please.\n\nNR: Well, I'll take that as a no comment.\n\nC: Sir, where are you going? I am thirsty. Do you think any of us knows what is going on? Sir? We are peons.  But rest assured that sh** roles down hill, so anything the US does to our government, it does to us first.  They wil not go hungry or thirsty, our government officials.  They are at the top. Sir?..........Sir..........oh for god's sake! I am thirsty!\n(Speaking to NR's back as he and his crew walk to van, ignoring C and load their equipment back into it.)