What are Koala's habits?
598997
Koala's To Do List:\n\n1) Eat eucalyptus leaves.\n2) Look cute.
931384
Simple  my friend:\n\nZebras do not have pockets and therefore if they were to mug lions they would have no-where to put anything they mugged off them.\nThats the trouble with zebras everything is so black and white.\nNow Kangeroos, they will mug anything as they have the storage capacity and also know where they can get rid of the goods\n\nMany a dingo has lost jewelry cash and mobiles to a rampaging bunch of roos\n\nIn Africa the lion very rarely gets mugged and if he did he wouldnt tell anyone about it because of his pride\n\nPride is important to a lion, i know that because david attenborough said it once on planet earth..well lets be honest he isnt going to say it on the moon is he\nHope this helps
397339
Hang on.  You can suspend your disbelief enough to allow for talking animals... but you can't handle the accent?  I think you should more concerned that the damn koala is talking in the first place.
472752
The koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) is a marsupial, and is not part of the bear family.
164769
In reality, male koalas only have one penis, but it is split in two parts, in the shape of letter Y. This is called hemipenes.  Iguanas, snakes, koalas, and Komodo dragons all have a hemipenes. The dual penis is for ease of left-handed or right-handed mating. Also, at least in snakes, the semen does not flow through a vessel (like in mammals), but rather, a groove."
493236
probably chimpanzees... they just seem to have that mentality to me... not sure why. :)
910504
The humans are interesting to watch, especially if its feeding time or mating season.  I love to watch them stuff their faces full of food.  Odd creatures, yet fascinating.  If not them, see the primates first.  They seem to be the most active.
1166751
It is a fastinating animal, from Australia.  It is not the result of any cross breeding.  It is distinct, one of a kind.
746818
I actually personally work with eastern gray kangaroos at my local zoo, along with bennett's wallabies. they are very nice (all the ones i work with are females), of course these have been raised and have been comfortable around human contact their entire lives. they are very curious, however if they don't like something, they will let you know by growling at you, standing up on their back legs, and sometimes their tail. i have only been kicked once, but it was my fault, i startled her. if you have any more questions about roos, i would be more than happy to help ya out the best i can. i could talk about them for days! :)
288902
Koalas are sooooo cute!!! Wish they would have lots and lots of babies!!!!
426905
Koalas don't have teeth but they have mighty sharp claws. Males are more friendlyer than females. But both wont calw at you if you hold them right and don't look vicous.
639891
I'm not into the whole taking-over-the-world thing, but you make an interesting point.  I'd probably choose squirrels (they're my favorite animals, that's why) or koalas.  Squirrels would be all quick and tricky and trying to confuse us all, and they'd probably try to run us all over with huge machine/car things, so they might not make the best world rulers; koalas, on the other hand, are pretty laid back and slow, although I know that the male koalas are known to get pretty violent and crazy during mating season, so that could potentially turn out bad as well...
315514
Interesting! You've already gotten some good answers, but I'll add my two cents.\nI think that, more than being related specifically to food-habits, this trait is related to habitat and overall habitus (which includes not only food type but also food consecution mechanisms, locomotor type and other characteristics of habitat use). And of course, to evolutionary history. All lineages have adaptations and constraints of their own.\nAs a basic consideration, most animals that live in terrestrial habitats move in a mostly 2-dimensional world. Flying and climbing animals are the exception, as well as those that may expect predators to come from above. Aquatic environments, on the other hand, are always very much 3-dimensional.\n\nIf we consider vertebrates (which I guess it's what your question was aiming at), most have eyes placed more or less laterally on the head, ensuring an extensive vision field with some (small) binocular central area. Of course, the tradeoff for lateralised eyes is that reduced superimposition of both eyes' fields, thus lesser binocular vision. In the same manner, frontal eyes reduce the total field of vision.\nA (very partial) list of terrestrial vertebrates with frontal eyes and/or enhanced stereopsis (binocular vision):\n\n-Plethodontid salamanders.\n-Chameleons, geckoes, varanids (Komodo dragons), and many arboreal snakes, among reptiles.\n- Strigiformes (owls) and Falconiformes (eagles, hawks...), but also the kakapo, a nocturnal Australian parrot, and the frogmouths (Caprimulgiformes Podargidae). \n-Many generalized marsupials such as opossums; primates and felids.\n\nNot all these animals are predators, and there are several predators with lateral eyes and mostly monocular vision. \nSo, in my opinion, the main factor is not so much what you eat, but how you get it and where you usually move.\n \nFor example, let's take the case of mammals. The earliest known fossils seem to have had nocturnal habits and partially frontal eyes, such as those seen today in opossums. From there, I can visualize different evolutionary paths tending to more laterally placed eyes in animals that have to avoid predators (such as many herbivores - e.g. hoofed mammals- , insectivores or omnivores), and more frontally placed eyes in mammals that require good 3-D vision, be it hunters (as felids) or species that move in a 3-D environment (primates), and/or have nocturnal activity. \n\nOther vertebrate groups have different evolutionary paths and adaptive histories. For instance, the eyes of all birds are extremely large in comparison with other vertebrates, with very wide vision fields; and all birds have binocular vision to some extent. Only specialized predator birds have frontal eyes, but I guess that all birds use their enlarged cerebellum to calculate distances on the basis of the 20-30º binocular field. \n\nAquatic fish-like vertebrates privilege wider vision angles, but there are fish with good binocular vision, such as the hammerhead sharks and also many deep-sea bony fish species. In the case of the first ones, it could be a predator specialization, whereas in the latter case it could be related to vision in low-light environments.\n\nArthropods have a different system altogether, and I think their adaptations and constraints merit a separate discussion (what an elegant way of avoiding it!). \n\nSo, although we like to identify patterns that allow us better understanding of the biological world, I don't think there is a direct relationship with a single factor. The list of possible factors influencing vision type includes:\n- phylogenetic history (including previous adaptations and constraints)\n- locomotor habit (running, flying, climbing)\n- feeding habit (including type of food and ways of searching for it)\n- diurnal/nocturnal activity\n\nI'm sure I'm leaving important things out... I'm not even sure if this all makes sense!\n\n-----------\nUpdate: Gianguru, you're amazing.
559857
A joey!!!\nA quokka is a kind of wallaby, but scientific studies show that it is really in a group of its own. Unlike other wallabies, it has a short stiff tail and short hind feet. Its ears are more rounded than those of other wallabies, and its skull and teeth are different.\nIt is a small marsupial, about 80 centimetres long. It weighs about 4 kilograms. It has longish coarse grey fur.\nQuokkas eat leaves rather than grass. They hop like other wallabies.\nFor Additional information check out the website below!
620894
http://www.calm.wa.gov.au/plants_animals/mammal_possum.html
191150
Kangaroos are found in Austrailia.  If I remember correctly they are grassland animals, and they fill the same ecological niche as deer.
828759
There was a meteor shower the last few days, but those happen about once a month or so, with varying intensities, so nothing new there really.  I think there's no reason to think there's a correlation between your animal's behaviour and cosmic events (since there has never been shown to have a correlation before, except during solar eclipses).  Check their food or any stressful factors instead before trying to blame the universe.