the outline about the British parliamentary form of Government..?
534756
sorry, i couldn't find anything about it on google.\nhttp://scotthortonshow.com/\nmoney, http://www.philipdru.com/griffin_stream.html\neducation, http://www.philipdru.com/taylor_stream.html\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/gatto_stream.html\ncorporate agriculture, http://www.philipdru.com/krebs_stream.html
325184
try those.\n\n\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_National_Government\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_government
87185
Try this site:\n\nhttp://www.usconstitution.net/\n\nIt has all kind of information on the Constitution.
173947
No- Technically the Queen is the head of State, but she has no real power.\n\nIn Britain, the power lies in Parliament. When a General Election is called(every 5 years) we elect in each constituency a Member of Parliament who sits in the House of Commons on that constituency's behalf. Then the party that has an overall majority of members there is entitled to form a government (currently the Labour Party). The leader of that party becomes the Prime Minister (Tony Blair) and he/she forms a Cabinet, which deals with all of the major responsibilities, and proposes bills to Parliament.
217973
Yes many differences. Look up for each system what their basis  and structure of govt are
229670
Parliment's purpose is to make laws for the country.\n\nThe Parliment represents the will of the people and proposes and passes laws for the country.
889079
Saudi Arabia democratic system is different to UK's, we operate a bicameral system which means anything our PM puts through in terms of big legislation has to go through to the House of Lords, just remember back to Fox hunting.... you think they can make big decisions like reforming the work laws or anything so contraversial, it will probably be a long time before anything such as this happens unfortunately.
694838
The U.S has a constitutional government and operates as a representative democracy through a congressional system under a set of powers specified by its Constitution.\n\nCanada is a constitutional monarchy with Elizabeth II, Queen of Canada as head of state, and a parliamentary democracy with a federal system of parliamentary government and strong democratic traditions.
530125
COALITION GOVERNMENT:\nA coalition government, or coalition cabinet, is a cabinet in parliamentary government in which several parties cooperate. The usual reason for this arrangement is that no party on its own has a majority in the parliament. In times of crisis such as a war or a major economic or political crisis parties may form an all-party National Unity Government or Grand Coalition.\nCabinets based on a coalition with majority in the parliament ideally are more stable and longlived than minority cabinets. While the former are prone to internal struggles, they have less reason to fear votes of non confidence, although majority governments based on a single party are usually even more stable as long as its majority can be maintained.\nOPPOSITION:\n\nParliamentary opposition is a form of political opposition to a designated government, particularly in a Westminster-based parliamentary system. Note that this article uses the term government as it is used in Parliamentary systems, i.e. meaning the administration or the cabinet rather than the state.\n\nIn First Past the Post assemblies, where the tendency to gravitate into two major parties or party groupings operates strongly, government and opposition roles can go to the two main groupings serially in alternation. In this context, the opposition forms a recognized, even semi-official "government-in-waiting". Its "opposing" can degenerate into a charade pending the eventual exchange of roles and occupation, or reoccupation, of the Treasury benches.\nSelect Committees:\nA Select Committee is a committee made up of a small number of parliamentary members appointed to deal with particular areas or issues originating in the Westminster System of parliamentary democracy. Select Committees exist, obviously, in the British Parliament, as well as in other parliaments based on the Westminster model, such as those in Australia and New Zealand.\nmembers bill: Private Member's Bill is a proposed law introduced by a backbench member of parliament, whether from the government or the opposition side, to that legislature or parliament. In most parliaments within the Westminster System of parliamentary democracy, the overwhelming majority of Bills introduced are proposed by members of the Cabinet. However some parliamentary time is often set aside so that backbenchers may introduce Bills also. Note that a private member's bill should not be confused with a private bill; private member's bills are in fact public bills.\n\nIn reality, few backbench Private Member's Bills make it to enactment. In some cases, controversial measures that a government does not want to take responsibility for may be introduced by backbenchers, with the government secretly or openly backing the measure and ensuring its passage. They are sometimes known as "Government handout bills". The Abortion Act 1967 was enacted in the United Kingdom through this means, with the Bill itself was introduced by a Liberal Party Member of Parliament, David Steel; through the support from Home Secretary Roy Jenkins the Bill was given enough government time to allow a full debate.\n\nMMP government:\nMixed member proportional representation, also termed mixed-member proportional representation and commonly abbreviated to MMP, is a voting system used to elect representatives to numerous legislatures around the world. MMP is similar to other forms of proportional representation in that the overall total of party members in the elected body is intended to mirror the overall proportion of votes received; it differs by including a set of members elected by geographic constituency who are deducted from the party totals so as to maintain overall proportionality. In the United Kingdom, the form of MMP in use for several bodies is known as the additional member system (AMS), although the term additional member system can also be more broadly applied to include parallel voting, a non-proportional
1136117
Freedom !!!!!!!!!  In the form of Democracy.   The British GOVT is OK , Prime Minister Blair really runs things well.  The Queen along with the rest of the Monarchy, is a tribute to the past, the History and what the Country symbolizes, but on a day to day of GOVT activities, Mr. Prime Minister Blair runs with it.
165675
They also have a House of Lords whose members inherit the\nseat rather than being elected. They rubber-stamp the legislation that Parliament passes.\n Their Prime Minister has more power in the Legislative branch of their government than the U.S. President may have\n in\nthe American Legislature. This is because he doesn't have to\ndeal with potential problems like,for example,a Congress or\nSenate with the majority of members belonging to the opposing party.\n As well,the British have a three-party system. These parties are the Conservatives,the Liberals and the Labor Party. The Conservative and Labor parties are the two main\nones,with the Liberals taking a relatively small percentage of the votes in elections.
514420
At the moment it is a democracy/constitutional monarchy, where the queen is the head of state but does not wield any power.\n\nPreviously Britain has been ruled by an absolute monarchy within a feudal system as well as having Oliver Cromwell, who, I guess, would be described as a president at a time when representational democracy did not really happen (1641?)
75138
The preamble basically outlined the goals of the new Constitution when it was written. It also denotes powers in the government, but not specifically.
399777
You could say that the British *way* of government is the best but not necessarily that the British government itself is the best.\n\nOur parliamentary system is known as the mother of all parliaments and has been a model used for centuries throughout pretty much all the demcracies in the world.  Each country has of course, it's own rules and regulations and it's own way of doing things but the system is based on the British system.\n\nI wouldn't necessarily agree with your comments.  You say that we have low taxes, in fact, we have higher than average taxes paying 41p in every £1 earned as tax.  This compares quite well to the EU as a whole (48p) but quite poor in comparison to other countries (29p in the US for example).\n\nOur economy isn't particularly healthy and today's announcement of thousands of job losses at Peugeot is a good example.  If it weren't for the trillions of dollars worth of north sea gas and oil that's been keeping the economy afloat for 32 years then we, as a nation, would have been bankrupt a long time ago.  We used to be world leaders in textiles, ship-building, steel, electronics, engineering, railways but all these industries have long since declined.\n\nWe do have free healthcare but the NHS, which was once the envy of the world, is in crisis.  Huge sums of money have been pumped into it yet we can only staff it by draining the resources of other countries by paying their doctors and nurses to come over here.\n\nThe safety net you mention costs over £100 billion a year, that's the equivalent of £5,000 for every single household in the country.  Considering that the average household gets nowhere near this amount it demonstartes just how much is wasted on bureaucracy.  To give you one example from when my Dad worked for the government... It was decided to look into the possibility of moving one of the government departments to new offices, it cost us (the taxpayer) £94 million for them to decide to stay where they were.
1104281
The head of state in Scotland is the British monarch, currently Queen Elizabeth II (since 1952).\n\nThe Kingdom of Scotland ceased to be an independent state on 1 May 1707.\n\nIn 1603, James VI of Scotland inherited the English throne upon the death of Elizabeth I. From then until 1707, England, Scotland and Ireland had shared monarchs.\n\nIn 1707, the Act of Union merged the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland into the Kingdom of Great Britain.\n\nUnder a system of devolution (or home rule) adopted in the late 1990s two constitutent countries within the United Kingdom, Scotland and Wales, voted for limited self-government, subject to the ability of the UK Parliament in Westminster, nominally at will, to amend, change, broaden or abolish the national governmental systems. As such the Scottish Parliament is not de jure sovereign. However, it is thought unlikely that any UK parliament would try to unilaterally abolish the devolved parliament and government without consultation via a referendum with the voters of the constituent country.\n\nThe Presiding Officer (Oifigear-Riaghlaidh in Scots Gaelic) is the Speaker, the person elected by the Members of the Scottish Parliament to chair their meetings. He (or she) also heads the Corporate Body of the Scottish Parliament and as such is viewed as a figurehead for the entire organisation. Two deputy presiding officers are elected to help fulfil the role.\n\nThe first person to hold the position was David Steel, Baron Steel of Aikwood, appointed in 1999.\n\nList of Presiding Officers\nDavid Steel, Baron Steel of Aikwood 1999-2003 \nGeorge Reid 2003-present
968248
Read up. \nhttp://www.answers.com/topic/reform-act-1832\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_Act_1832\nhttp://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/PR1832.htm\n\nBasically, the Tories, who served in the House of Lords, were being threatened by members of the House of Commons, which is similar to the House of Representatives in that they are elected to represent the people, because the people were no longer willing to put up with them. The Tories were politicians favoured by royal authority and the established church, and who sought to preserve the traditional political structure. So basically, the Tories were only interested in surving the wealthy.  The House of Lords is a politcal house in which wealthy, noblemen are pretty much born into. \n\nThere is much more information so read up! GOOD LUCK!
548765
The previous answer is correct. For more information, visit www.royal.gov.uk. This is the official website of the British Monarchy and has a wealth of information.