do courts have to let the accused ask for fingerprints to show that he did'nt have a gun on hes person?
609682
well that is a part of evidence so they will get to the point of asking for the finger prints on the gun. now if you have a lawyer then the processe will go alot faster.
905737
Law abiding citizens can have all the guns they want. Everyone I know has at least one.  If the police show up to take my gun, well, there will be some shooting. It is my right to have one and to defend myself in my home. Badge or no badge, no one will get it without getting shot.
194201
Someone who has been accused of comitting a crime or is believed to have comitted a crime but it hasn't yet been proven in a court of law.
342019
No, depending on the state, but here in COlorado once you file the DV charges, the state takes over and prosecute's. The only way you can "drop" them is if they go to court and he pleads not guilty, they will go to a jury trial, and all you have to do is not show up then there is no evidence, and nothing happens to you either.
785110
You would probably have to get in touch with the county where the person was tried and ask if they have a data base, though, knowing that the criminals have more rights than we do, they probably protect that info. Good luck.
823682
The Law exists, and is there. However there are some little minor glitches here.\n1) Why do you have a gun?\n2)Why did you not attempt to walk away and call the Police/\n   (taking the Law in to your own hands...)\n3) you must be able to prove beyond reasonable "doubt" that    you  were in a situation of self defense, and you had no other recourse.\nMost likely you will go to prison, unless you can prove with witnesses.............
1024100
No, he does not have to show you. If you decide to plead not guilty, the officer can be questioned, in court, about the radar gun he used, it's operation and maintenance.
703617
Your husband is the victim of identity theft.  I would start by retaining counsel and then having the attorney contact the police department to determine what their records show.  The attorney can also advise you on the procedure in Arizona for resubmission of fingerprints on your husband, so that the proper name is associated with this, and that if your husband is stopped on a traffic stop, he isn't required to prove that he isn't your brother.\n\nFor a referral to an Arizona attorney, consult your local or state bar association.
745277
First of all your a dumb#ss for letting him borrow it.  But second of all... they will not be able to trace the bullets back to you.  Because even though those bullets may have lands and grooves and striations made by your gun that can be matched 100% to the barrel and firing pin of your weapon, they would need your gun to match the bullets to make a match.  Your gun would have to be recovered at a crime or reported stolen and recovered in order to be run through IBIS or some similar database at a crime lab.  Unless they go and take all the .38 smith and wessons and test them which isn't going to happen.  But if you do hear something about a crime he commited I'd go to the cops anyways to clear your conscience.
661017
No... You committed no crime, and unless you suspect that the item in question was connected to a felony there is no requirement to hand it it.
1116957
Yes. The person for whom it is issued can't own a firearm for a certain period among other restrictions.
929764
If people want to cover thier faces, they can, if they don't, they don't have to. It's their face!!! If it makes it difficult for the police to identify people and arrest them, then they can nicely ask the men to remove the facial covering for them. But what police officer is gonna know the face of a criminal from memory or picture? In the world where plastic surgery is possible how does the face even give a clue to who a person might be? The real clue is DNA, so go with the fingerprints!!\n      I always thougt that just because a few people from a group did something, it did not mean that the rest did it too. That's called being prejudiced. Being American [and i'm not saying that Americans are the only ones that believe this] I believe that you are innocent until proven guilty.
381266
In most states, it does not matter.\n\nFor example, in Georgia an Armed Robbery is a robbery committed with an offensive weapon, any replica of an offensive weapon, or a device having the appearance of any such weapon. It is actually possible to be convicted of armed robbery if you did not have a weapon. For example, if you put your hand in your pocket and cause someone to believe you have a gun, you could be convicted of Armed Robbery. \n\nTherefore, the fact that you had a real gun, whether it worked or not, would allow you to be convicted of armed robbery.
1137436
that is not up to florida but up too the fbi. they did a background check on him and the mental problem wasn't on record. if you are concerned call your local fbi office and they will have it revoked it will go on file and he will have to give up his permit.also he will never be allowed to own a hand gun again. problem solved.
620619
sure you can\n\njust don't forget to put a phony weapon in the culprit's hand, once you have shot him, as depending on where you live, the suspect need to be armed, for you to qualify as legitimate self defense.\n\non other hands, why not rather just prevent him from crossing over your badly protected home? Raise the height of the fences, put dogs all around, 24/7 security, armed private patrol rangers all over the lawn..\n\nwhat ? you cannot afford it ?\n\nthen most likely there is nothing worth vandalizing, so why bother ?
190562
if the cop has suspision of you doing something or carrying something in your purse then yes but he Must ask you for permission b4 doing so. it is your right to refuse & tell him to get a warrant to search your purse.
783937
Miranda is based on a case law - Miranda v. Arizona - and established the necessity for the police to advise a person of their rights when they are both (1) in custody abd (2) being questioned.  It applies across the country, though the exact wording does vary from place to place, state to state, etc.\n\nThe police do not have to advise you of these rights unless the two above conditions are met.\n\nSo, if the police question you and you are not in custody, the police do not have to give you your rights.  If you are in custody and not being questioned, the police do not have to give you your rights.\n\nMiranda also does not apply under certain special circumstances such as when public safety could be jeopardized if you are not immediately questioned (i.e., you may have discarded a loaded gun in a public place and finding it will ensure public safety).