What's latest on Intel? And what would be Intel s next big thing?
605450
Currently, the latest in Intel is their Pentium D processors as well as their Core Duo processors for mobile solutions. Their next biggest thing is called the Conroe Processor for desktops and Merom for mobile solutions. They're expected to show up in late Q2 or Q3. Conroe and Merom have already been tested out significantly and are showing to be much more capable than any of the current Intel processors, and are easily surpassing all of AMD's X2s. At the same time, AMD is set to release its AM2 processors, so you'll just have to wait and see which is better in time.
195812
realalexpc's answer is absolutely right; but to answer your question: I don't think Intel makes ANY 64-bit processors.
974062
intel core 2 duo\nfamily t7x00 not t5x00\n\n>> base t7200 is 2.0 ghz, 667 mhz fsb & 4 mb l2 cache > which is awesome\n\nturin struggles at 512 kb to 1 mb l2 cache, further divided between the 2 cores ! <256+256 / 512+512>
93216
it looks like they're not rushing to release this too soon.  According to the following content I found on microsoft's site, probably next year at the earliest.  performance on programs like this probably won't suffer as much as graphic, layout or video-editting software that is running in the emulation module: rosetta, however, so I wouldn't necessarily let the lack of a new office delay you too much.\n\n"Q. Will you re-release Office 2004 for Intel-based Macs?\n\nA. No. There are no plans to re-release Office 2004. With Rosetta, Office 2004 runs well on Intel-based Macs.\n\nQ. When will the next version of Office for Mac be available?\n\nA. The next version of Office for Mac is under development, and we typically release a new version every two to three years. Although we are on track, making sure that our next version will run on the Intel-based Macs will likely require additional time in our development schedule. We will know more about our release date after we’ve thoroughly evaluated the Intel-based Macs, and have identified any changes we need to make so that Office for Mac runs smoothly on both PowerPC-based Macs and Intel-based Macs. "
246036
intel's CORE DUO\n\nAMD'S x2
942628
Intel's Dual Core CPU's have 17 major flaws in them that have appeared in the last 4wks. They aren't telling to much about it until they can fix the problem. The 1st of the Dual Core CPU's will not be replace with new fixed ones. The CPU's are in the BETA stage....Sorry...But there's not fix at this time....Thanks
332067
Chipset as in the motherboard Chipset like Intels 975x or do you mean the processors?  \n\nIf you're talking processors AMD is kind of spanking Intel the last year.  They're chips are running quicker at slower Speeds and in the last couple large benchmark tests done by Cnet and a few other sites like anandtech.com AMD seems to be the better processor in almost all benchmarks and not to mention they also win the Price war with Intel. \n\nMy last PC that i bought, a $3000 Alienware, i got the 3.0Ghz Intel Dual core,  Now i'm kinda jealous of the new AMD chips that seem to run all over the Intel chip that i have. \n\nIf money is no object get the new AMD Athlon 64 FX-60+.  You won't be disappointed.
1148471
that is not a motherboard, intel are brands for processor.\nlook at the speed, the one with the highest speed is the best.
400692
Definitely the semiconductor and transistor industry.  Just recently, intel was able to make CPU's with 60nm transistors, thus able to fit 33% more transistors than the previous 90nm technology, which allows for a faster and more efficient CPU.
694694
I would suggest that you wait until the release of Windows Vista, which will be in January for business and a few months later for individuals.  Wait until all the bugs and flaws are worked out, and see what kind of hardware works well for Vista.\n\nI like the Intel Chip set but a lot of people I work with like AMD. I look at it like this: the bigger the better. Get the best stuff you can in your price range.
410956
there is a new Intel CPU in the pipeline, named Conroe. the only thing i read is a short test report of a comparison, Conroe vs. an overclocked (2.8GHz) Athlon 64 FX-60, whereby amazingly the Conroe beat in all tests AMDs flagship.\n\ntest report\nhttp://techreport.com/etc/2006q1/conroe/index.x?pg=1
28218
Name of the next workstation OS will be "Vista" (was codenamed 'Longhorn' while in pre-release).\n\nThere's already been some debate in 'Answers' about when it will be released: my gut tells me mid-2006, based on delays they've had so far.
317648
I'm simply appalled at the number of people recommending Intel.  I'll just assume that they have been living under the perverbeal rock.  It's not here-say, there's hard proof that AMD just crushed Intel.  AMD occupies the top of every single benchmark comparing their processors to Intel.  Intel processors are slow, inefficient and run hotter than AMD counterparts.  Performance wise you CANNOT BEAT an AMD processor.  The fastest for gaming are the Athlon 64 FX series.  The dual core Athlon FX-60 is currently the fastest consumer processor but you'll pay upwards of $900 just for that processor.  If you need proof Tomshardware has the incontrovertible evidence that Intel just sucks, period, http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/11/21/the_mother_of_all_cpu_charts_2005/page24.html I'd never buy an Intel processor, EVER.
12991
AMD is far superior to Intel.  In laptop land you will want to look for a AMD Athlon 64 3200+, 3500+ or 4000+ and if you can get the 4000+ you will be one very lucky, person.  I wanted the laptop with a 4000+ processor in it and they ran out of stock before I could get over to Best Buy so I guess I'll have to make do with my 3000+.\n\nIf you're looking for benchmarks, see the link below.  Notice all the processors at the top are AMD.
221377
go to this web site and you can read there all the stuff about Intel and AMD CPUs and a lot of comparisons.\nhttp://techreport.com/reviews/page.x?pg=processors
907637
If you use and Intel Chip try my FAV program\n\n\nhttp://www.intel.com/design/motherbd/active.htm
256039
AMD, they're more efficient, and an improvement on Intel's stuff. Intel pioneers, AMD improves. Clock speed isn't everything.