Are fruits and objects animate or inanimate?
607086
Have you ever seen the movie Poltergeist? You seem to have lots of weird stuff going on around you , maybe the cause is paranormal.
565605
they look like weebles but more egg shaped. the name for what they do is nestables. figurines that start from smallest to largest that fit inside each other. certain nestables arepretty. they are fun to collect. the characters she's referring to are'nt all that great.
198980
A personification poem gives life to an inanimate object.  It would be like a poem about a table.
853208
Anímate chiquita \n\nYou can also say: Anímate niña (it's the same)
196598
Fruit's good as long as it's one fruit. If it's Strawberry scent, that's cool. If it's Peach Melon Lemonberry Sugar Pie, no. D:
247751
Stop motion animation, miniatures, rear projection.
385280
table\nangle\nrumble\ncrumble\nlovable\ncycle\ntriangle\nnoble
57448
bananas\npotatoes\ncitrus fruits\npeanuts
703147
artificial is manmade or a substitute 4 something real and natural is where it is made by nature like water, trees ,and animals. Things like natural resources r natural but artificial thing r like artififcial legs, grass, and artificial flavoring in some foods
943044
It's a fruit, product of a tree!
420961
it was about objects in motion
514545
By their definitions, you can't have both.\nIf a force is truly unstoppable, then no object is unmovable.\nIf an object is truly unmovable, then no force can be unstoppable.\n\nThen again, the force may just pass through the object the way neutrinos pass through the earth.
505901
There cant be an unstoppable force or an immovable objet in nature, so their collision can only be imaginary.\neven if it happens one of them has to behave abnormally!!\nSo Either the force will be stopped or the object will move, either ways there will be deviation from nature!!\n\nIt is like asking is infinity < infinity +1 !!\nThink about it!!
70856
The apple story is an exaggeration at best, a myth at worst.  I don't know too much about it, but my understanding is that Kepler had made three assertations concerning the motion of heavenly bodies and Newton found the mathematics that fit the results.  Everyone knew the moon hung in the sky, circling the Earth forever, but no one knew why.  On Earth (where people draw most of their experiences and intuition), it seemed that objects wouldn't accelerate on their own accord unless they were in contact with something.  Newton's insight was that objects can accelerate without contact, and the same force that pulls objects (like apples) towards the ground is the force that "holds" the moon in its orbit.
1055913
I'm not sure I understand your question.\nDo you mean that, "If "bananas", a never-before seen or imagined item suddenly appeared out of thin air, then Athiests would believe that these bananas came from monkeys"?\n\nIf so, then I would answer by saying that very rarely (if ever) do new objects suddenly appear from no source. (This does happen on a sub-atomic level, but only to certain particles and certainly not to "bananas") \n\nIf, someday something were to materialize from nowhere, it would be illogical to assume that the entire Athiest community would throw up their hands and declare, "The monkeys did it!" More reasonably, they would study the "bananas" and if after many trials, the "bananas" were not identified to have come from anywhere, they would probably classify "bananas" as a new type of "super-material" and leave it for future generations to ponder.\n\nIn regards to your question about proving the non-existance of such "bananas", that would be easy. All you have to do is show that "bananas" appeared recently. Then you could easily say that because no "bananas" existed before the date they first appeared, they must not have existed then. In other words, the current existence of the "bananas" is proof that they didn't exist then.\n\nIf I misunderstood your question I am sorry, please disregard my answer.
1109288
Responses without sources aren't answers, just opinions.\n\nAnthropomorphism, a form of personification (applying human or animal qualities to inanimate objects) and similar to prosopopoeia (adopting the persona of another person), is the attribution of human characteristics and qualities to non-human beings, objects, natural, or supernatural phenomena. Animals, forces of nature, and unseen or unknown authors of chance are frequent subjects of anthropomorphosis.
60967
Depends.  \nIf it is one apple plus one orange, the answer could be "1 plus 1".\nIt could also be 2 as in 2 fruit.