Justifiable or gross abuse of power?
600760
Littering is a misdemeanor...but they usually don't pull you over for it...unless it's quota time\n\nAnd why do you have to appear in court if you didn't get a ticket....sounds more like a verbal warning\n\n\nA summons huh?...that's a little odd usually they give you a ticket if you have to appear in court.\n\noh and btw I think it's more of a gross abuse of power ,just to get there quota for the month
229252
The guilt must be proved. This is writted in the law. But it's true that some people are treated like they were so. There are intents to stop this.
131656
I agree with the first 2 answers...and would like to add I certainly would be embarassed to keeping a leader..(if he deserves that title) such as him in power..when he is doing so much destruction...this certainly is not the road to peace that Humans deserve.
101354
Power corrupts and if you are a cop then that would be us and if they'd like they will prove it by showing you it is just-us.  If you think just-us is justice then you are part of the problem.  Thick corruption and a passive society of smacked asses.  Then too, the cop will say, "We can do that and you cannot.  Yet through it all, they are a neccesary evil in that there are those times when their assistance is needed: Even inside prisons.  Therefore what we have is a mixture of shit and honey.  Amen.
97189
There is authority in the Bill of Rights to protect you from forced consent to certain things (search and seizure, quartering troops, etc).  But anything else is up for argument.
779577
Yes very much so. Apparently people are not reasonable enough to handle have this privilege. Sometimes one bad irresponsible person ruins it for all.
436819
Assuming for the sake of argument that you've accurately presented all the facts, I would say a fine is in order but nothing more.\n\nBeing run off the road is definitely an extenuating circumstance, but slapping someone unprovoked is never acceptable.\n\nThe woman who ran the other woman off the road should separately be on a much larger, pointier hook for what she did.
879447
Hypocracy!\nIt is the administrator killer.
978429
To be honest, I don't think it's fair at all.  The world should be for everyone, isn't it?  But people in power don't seem to think so.
802973
No and if it is possible then it is not an abuse. It is an oversight.
877345
I agree. Party affiliation aside, I believe that anyone who wants to waste our time and money deserves ejection from office. It's insulting to the people who elected the official to be petty and frivolous.
408808
Thats a good question and you are certainly NOT a freak for asking it! I certainly think there is more to it than the 'powers that be' would like us to think. It is ALWAYS healthy to ask questions of those who govern/control, otherwise we become ignorant sheep.
126245
Yes it most certainly is.  Misconduct can be deemed as a person misusing their power and authority or behaving poorly; Corruption is worse because the decisions involved with corruption often lead to extreme gain for one person or organization over the expense of the larger body.
729952
I think it is about people being mislead in order for some people to exact revenge, make huge amounts of money, and revel in their power.\nIt is unjust that innocent people on both sides have to suffer and have little choice in their fate.
968575
impreachment and prision
349164
No, 'abuse of power' is not a crime or an ethics violation for lawyers.  I am not sure what you mean.  Using government agencies for research is generally not only legal, it is encouraged, because they have the official sources of information, text of court opinions, official filings, etc.  If by personal research you mean that it was not business related, and somehow they should have paid for it but did not, then that could be some kind of fraud, but your question is very unclear.
943848
Revenge is premeditated and therefore wrong. A justifiable murder, say in the defence against extreme violence towards oneself or one's family should be looked on leniently.