What Clinton and Bush did for us?
594673
Clinton brought many scandals to the White House ; had numerous affairs( he lied under oath: "I did not have an affair with THAT WOMAN"); the Whitewater scandal;Travel Office fiasco ; the death of Vince Foster.. Clinton was the greatest security risk to the United States .He was more concerned with a golf tournament than the military mission that was waiting for the "go-ahead, with pilots in the cockpit , having to abort , because Clinton refused to be distracted from golf .Clinton used the Soldier's & Sailor's Relief Act of 1940 to delay the Paula Jones misconduct lawsuit-but had to withdraw that argument after many in the military lost complete faith in him and protested .The list is endless-and don't forget Bill & Hillary looting the White House when they left.\n  "W", on the other hand inherited a severely weakened military after "The Clintons" left office , along with a loss in morale for recruitment of troops . George Bush's committment to the military has made great strides to protect our nation. Homeland Security after 9/11-whereas after the first bombing of the WTC , under Bill Clinton, he couldn't be bothered to go to the scene .On 9/11 the Secret Service tried to get George Bush away from Gound Zero , for his safety-but he refused to leave until the "heroes" were able to say what they wanted to say to him ."W" has proved to be a take-charge President who is determined to protect the US and defend freedom. Those who followed Clinton , have only talked about protecting the rights of the enemy; and denouncing the very soldiers who are protecting our nation .When hundreds of thousands of mutilated bodies were found in Saddams mass graves , Ted Chappiquiddick Kennedy compared President Bush to a BRUTAL DICTATOR. WHEN AMERICANS WERE BEING BEHEADED, Clinton's crowd was upset over abu Grabbe .President Bush has seen many of his programs succeed . Besides Homeland Security, the Patriot Act , and keeping our economy from crumbling after 9/11, George W. Bush values our military and values the American people-despite what his detractors may say .When George Bush took the Oath of Office, he meant it !
29129
The Republicans wanted to impeach Clinton for what he did...  What Bush has done ranks much higher on the reasons for impeachment
1142058
Bush has nothing to really do with the economy as it is today....try looking at the Media's scare tactics....a bad report from Ted Tunners monkeys and the stock market goes down.\n Clinton is the gulity one..he gave our trade to China,who hates us & has one of our deep water ports under their control and he also gave them the Suez Canal....
1017867
I think is awful but unfortunately its politics.  Clinton was too busy cleaning up his own mess in the White House to worry about helping another country in need.  He was also didn't help because they are no threat to America. He is a coward.
1120564
Supply side economics has never worked, it has always resulted in a recession. This administration is no different. We would really be in the dump if it was not for the war. Clinton used consumer driven economics, he raised taxes on the very rich and reinvested it into infrastructure, which created good paying jobs, when these people started buying things it created more jobs and the whole thing snowballed to the largest expansion in the country's history. When he left office he left the budget in the black and was paying down on the national debt. It did not take Bush long to destroy all the advances that we had made and are now going in debt at a record clip.
559782
The legacy of Bush's damage is the death of hundreds of thousands of people, the destruction of one of the greatest ancient civilizations, and the ruin of the U.S. economy.\n\nThe legacy of Clinton's damage is a few semen stains on some clothes, and the unlikely careers of some distinctly untalented women (e.g., Jessica Hahn and Monica Lewinsky).
578838
ask bill clinton...when he wasnt dittling around with monica, he made China the "Most favored nation"...title which was an honor in trade terms...it meant give them anything they want...we want their business....\n\nheres another ism for you mind...guess who was the most favored visitor to the white house during the clinton years...over 131 visits....\n\nanswer.....Yasser Arafat...\n\nwho we have also given about 4 million dollars a year for  25 years...\n\nthe founder of the Hamas palistianians...that money didnt do us a lot of good....we financed his operation...\n\npolitics makes strange bed fellows.....Mark Twain...1863
690995
Yes I do! Bill Clinton was an awesome President for America. George Bush has destroyed everything Clinton got accomplished in 6 short years.
533594
I didn't vote for Bush but\n\n1-Clinton allowed the 5 major oil companies to buy the smaller ones out-he knew why they wanted too-he would not look in to alternatives, -look at Coalition for Alternative Fuel(on web)-he refused to grant anything for an alternative-Bush is allowing more help here.\n\n2-No doubt about it we need some order to the immigration issue-masses were flooding annually-this has caused problems(schools-state aid-medical)they came long before and no one wanted to see-they rather cut programs here (was this fair to poor here?) Bush did something-others did nothing\n\n3-War-this is always tricky-I do not support the war-but in fairness-Bush is not afraid to do something (rather we see the reason or not)many allowed some harm (better look at Ollie North  on web statement-years ago-he said these same terrorist we are dealing with today were trouble than-no one did anything-could have been some prevention of things and life's than)We did not enter Hitler's territory (history) until after thousands and thousands died-we stalled. At least he does speak out (rather we agree or not-Others cost lives by their not doing anything)\n\n4. -After huge spending on Clinton's part-many programs for poor were cut (especially Mental health and some Physical health-he allowed Pharmaceuticals companies do charge enormous prices-and allowed them to threaten Canada (what other company could) to not sell to seniors there or they would cut off the sale of vital medicine to them (heart) at least change the prices  (look on web). Now more in government are speaking out for the right too-No one said anything with the others .And Health was Clinton's campaign.\n\n5-He sees his popularity and it must be tough-Clinton would have cried and do anything (even at cost to us) for his ego.\n\n6- I hate to say this but Reagan-really hurt the environment-allowing many things that took years to get. Big time pollution. Many followed.  See how much waste is allowed for companies (on web)to dump even in water. Bush has hesitated in this area-not sure why-but he is not permitted a lot of things from companies. Hasn't done anything but hasn't hurt more.\n\n7-We see why we need to learn to speak well (although many who look and speak well are the biggest liars-snakes we have)\n\n8-No silly sex scandals-he does know to conduct himself in a nice way.\n\n9-Barbra-does do a lot of good charities-and when she is there she doesn't make it a champaign for herself. (like Hillary)\n\n10-I don't know about 'your' statement on Bush and terrorism-so I will take the blank face Bush has shown and give it to you. Thanks Bush\n\nThere is 10-all you can look up or see for yourself. Do I get a prize for this even though I didn't vote for him or Clinton?  I'm independent most don't know you can write your own-rather they like it or not.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\ns
1175929
I'm not of either party, but I'll answer anyway:\n\nBush: His tough will do attitude.  I respect him for this.  Sadly I feel like he's using it as a fear tactic and not appropriately.\n\nClinton: I respect his diplomacy. Nations actually wanted to work with us when Clinton was in charge.  \n\nIf we had a combo of both, we'd be great.
930710
Two people- Bush and Blair
549584
In retrospect, Clinton was one of the better presidents the United States has had. Setting his personal life aside, he managed to bring our financial house in order after years of mismanagement by Reagan and Bush.\n\nClinton was responsible about the use of US military power globally. He got rid of Slobodan Milosevic, and actually did attempt to take down bin Laden.\n\nHis trade policies were based on flawed assumptions, and cost the US hundreds of thousands of jobs, but I can't see a Republican being better.\n\nBill Clinton had his flaws, but he is light years ahead of the guy in the White House now.
554758
Absolutely.  It has nothing to do with anything Clinton did or didn't do.  Bush is by far the worst leader in the history of Earth.
760504
Nixon and Clinton .......... and none of these two president committed a worst crime than bush\n\nsorry ...... i sincerely apologise and admitted my mistake as an honorable liberal do ..... SORRY! should have studied my history
536582
Clinton was an AMAZING president. What I don't understand about this whole thing, though, is why he was nearly impeached for lying about sex, while our current president is rewarded for bringing our country to war under false pretenses.
631826
I voted for the first Bush and the second. I am not ashamed to say and no I do not regret it. He is doing a great job. What have you done for our country?
68682
It was awesome with Clinton. Bush...well, we should've only had one go with him...