do the hajis have a nuke inside the u.s.?
605695
You're a tool, the only people who have a nuke in the states are the crazy morons in government.
847571
if by we, you mean us and uk, then yes.\nsaw a very disturbing documentary about depleated uranium shells which were supposedly not used during first gulf war.\nguy using a giga-counter (?) actually recieved a pre-programmed audible warning to leave the area immediately. that was while examining a destroyed tank on which children were playing. many birth defects / still births in the same area and around the country.\nthe victors write the history books.\n\nworlds fked up.\n\nalso bradley is not only vehicle that uses dep uranium - a10 aircraft too. have gun is fool.
302101
Yes, of course there is such a location. It is a US military flight test facility in the middle of the Nevada desert. I seriously doubt it has the so called alien space ships in storage as rumored for the past 60 years. However, it does have very high technology aircraft, engines, and space related electronic and aviation equipment within its confines. Unlike most US military facilities, it is not open to the public and what occurs there is in most cases information that is classified in accordance with the National Security Act of 1950. It is this aura of secrecy that keeps the science fiction writers and rumors flying concerning what is there and what happens there. The base was built in its location to make access and observation of operations more difficult, since the majority of the equipment and operations are classified to protect the national security of the USA. Hopefully, this answers your question.
201783
I actually think the Air Force was telling the truth on this one, there are no aliens in their custody at Area 51 or any other place. The 'craft' found in the late forties really was a weather baloon.\n\nPlease remember, at the time the weather baloons were the only way for the USAF to obtain spy photographs of the Soviet Union, and this was before the Berlin Blockade, so the USA was still technically USSR's ally. We did not want to admit that we were spying and provoking war. Also, Roswell was the only airbase with an active force of aircraft capable of nuclear delivery. Well into the 1950's the US military still had no idea of how to handle nuclear material safely, thus the recurrence of above ground testing, soldiers marched into mushroom clouds in the desert and the Bikini Atoll fiasco, not to mention the strange wounds reported at the base hospital.\n\nI don't think there is a greater intelligence in the universe. I think we are it, and we're pretty stupid all in all!
1040504
If you are talking about just New Mexico, than the answer is probably not.  \n\nThere was only one above ground nuclear weapons test in New Mexico (the testing of the very first atom bomb at the Trinity Site in the White Sands Test Range near Alamagordo on July 16, 1945).  This blast was one of the weakest ever in terms of power and radiation and there were very few people present (due more to the secrecy of it, than for health reasons).  The test area is still largely off limits to people and there were no large population centers nearby or immediately downwind at the time.\n\nHowever, many Americans were exposed to radioactive fallout from the numerous nuclear tests that were conducted in Nevada during the 1950s and 60s.  There have been many documented cases of statistically high cancer rates and birth defects and deformities (which is what most 'mutations' result in) for people that were living downwind of the test site in Nevada, Utah and parts of Northern Arizona.  These are the tests where tourists would sometimes watch from a distance (as noted by another poster), there were no tourists present for the one New Mexico test.
113141
Why do the Americans think the world belongs to them. Who gave  America the right to have nukes and stop others from having them. USA is the only country to have used Nukes in war. \n\nUsa has no right to stop Iran from developing Nukes, like it had no rite to attack Iraq. Why does Isreal get to have nukes ? why doesnt Usa Attack Isreal?? Why does india get american help to develop nukes ?\n\nDude no country has the right to stop others from developing Nukes ... especially the country which has the largest depo of nukes themselves !
289971
Yes. They are currently using them in Iraq in the form of Depleted Uranium. \n\nAmerican soldiers have dropped Depleted Uranium (DU) on enemy combatants since 1991. It is lethal; it is horrid, and although it doesn’t have the showmanship of a mushroom cloud, it is still a nuclear bomb. \n\nThe use of DU is illegal under all international agreements, treaties, and covenants and it is illegal even under U.S. military law regarding WMDs. It breaches the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the UN Charter, the Genocide Convention, the Convention against Torture, the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, the Conventional Weapons Convention of 1980, and the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907.But in defiance of those international treaties, and its own laws, the United States continues to use this destructive material with full knowledge that its use could result in the slow annihilation of all species, including our own. \n\nDepleted uranium is a waste by-product of nuclear weapons and domestic nuclear power. It is used in weapons because it is cheap, ignites easily and burns fiercely on hitting a solid target. When it impacts, it releases an aerosol of fine uranium oxide that is breathable and spreads great distances by wind until weighted down by rain, where it falls to the ground and is absorbed into soil or water sources. \n\nScientists are quite certain on two points: DU is deadly; and the effects of this material will continue to contaminate the Earth long after humans are extinct. DU is the Trojan Horse of nuclear war, the ultimate gift that keeps on giving. The half-life of the material is 4.5 billion years. \n\nThis is very dangerous material: it meets the U.S. definition of a ''weapon of mass destruction'' and while the United States is prepared to invade sovereign countries on the basis they ''might'' have WMDs themselves and they ''might'' be willing to use them, the Americans actually have them and actually use them. And they use them in complete disregard for the people and nations on whom they are dropped, even in disregard for the health of their own and allied troops. In the months and years following Desert Storm, thousands of babies have been born to vets with horrible deformities (missing limbs, one eye, missing ears, incomplete or missing organs - reminiscent of the Thalidomide babies of the 1950s - but in far greater numbers. In 1995, Iraqi health officials reported alarmingly high increases in rare and unknown diseases, primarily in children, and presented a study of this state of affairs to the United Nations. The increases occurred in leukemia, carcinoma, cancers of the lung and digestive system, late-term miscarriages, congenital diseases, and deformities in fetuses, such as anencephaly (absence of a brain), and fused fingers and toes, not unlike those found in the babies of Gulf War veterans. \n\nIn response to the mounting evidence of the hazards, the American response has been to use the same material in the Balkans, in Afghanistan, and now in Iraq again.
1134141
I feel they have every right to self defense just as any other country in the world.  Remember, the US isn't one to police the world in terms of nukes.  The US is the only country that has ever used it as a weapon in war time. No other country has.  The US is just another landmass on the map.  If one country can have mass killing weapons, then everyone else has the right to defend themselves as well.
638789
now .. haven't you opened a can of worms ?!?!?!?\nit is a tough one, mainly because NO ONE can say whether or not there's actually a military (bomb-making) aspect to the "nuclear ambition". \nConstruction of the nuclear power plants in Iran started many years ago, long before the mullahs came to power ... so it's not as if this is something new that the current regime has suddenly come up with. In that sense, and since there is no "proof" of any malicious ;) activity, I personally don't see why not complete power plants on which millions and millions have been spent already. But then again : is there an atomic bomb hiding behind the facade? I don't know ... you don't know ... Bush doesn't know ... the IAEA doesn't know. To be fair, I would say all "countries" are "innocent" unless PROVEN otherwise.
271430
They have been at civil war in the middle east on some level, since before recorded history. It is their way of life. They teach their children to butcher people. They have killed each other with sticks, spears, machine guns, and bombs. If Iran has its way, they will soon be killing with the atom!
437785
Hmmm......I remember a couple years ago, bush said something like this (direct quote):\n\n"knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."\n\nYeah, I remember that, I was sitting in 105:H International Studies at Washington University when he said that, it was a reference to "Iraq's" "Nuclear technology" that we all know now that he never even had.....whooopsy, guess we can't use that phrase again....\n\nThey've been threatening Israel for the last 30 years, in fact you act as if Israel is so vulnerable, while as a matter of fact they are the ones that have ballistic missiles and atomic capablities, you act as if Iran is the bully===right.....hmmmm yeah did you get the memo? \n\n------------\n\nI don't like your attitude when it comes to describing their leaders either, I have my own feelings towards most Islamic extremists as I do for Christian extremists (Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson), but I don't go as far to label them and make a racial slur...you need to have some decency, and I know your probably quite young, however better to learn now than never right?
808853
No, not yet. But the media hounded them to be released to the public and that's where the item about making a bomb came from. It was in the news right before the election.
1004284
They have one ICBM intercontinental ballistic missile that has the capability of reaching California. The U.S. is deciding if they will destroy it before they test launch it or wait until they do and try and I mean try to blow it out of the sky with one of theirs, but have admitted that their not sure if they can hit it. This is why the U.S. just test launched a rocket over Alaska yesterday to knock a missile out of the sky.
92286
Because US gives them bonuses, as you may remember they declared their nukes just a few monthes ago without any protests and there are some other bonuses that I've heard of but I can't remember now.\nBut I must add that this good US friend government was the main human source of Taleban and Bin Laden a few years ago.\nAgain I must add that when Bin Laden was friend of US an Islamic country named Iran did all its best to help anti Bin Laden groups in Afghanestan but they failed because US was supporting Bin Laden and Iranians told that these people are dangerous but who cared?\nDo you know that there are some Islamic countries that have no armies Like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait,Qatar and UAE? Do you know how they protect their countries? They pay US and US protect them. Saudi Arabia Airports are always open for US military aircrafts.\nAnyways it seems you think all Muslims are natural born terrorists. \nYou are wrong.
789775
Yes. They are and will remain highly vulnerable to Islamic attack but in the USA all Ex-Presidents are given state security till life. So. they will never be insecure.
1125759
Fortunately .....yes if a country has researched extensively in the field of LASERS and has a SAM missile battery installed in one of the cities that city can be protected from a ballistic missile.\nthis is called anti ballistic missile technology. but the devastation to the environment can not be checked i mean to the atmosphere . the technology involves a LASER guided missile which is instantaneously launched if the in coming missile is identified as a ballistic missile.Identifying is done by low frequency ultrasonic signals , which identify whether the head as hyper sonic or super sonic usually ballistic missiles have hypersonic heads. if the atom bomb is launched in a cruise missile the only one who can save the city and that is ...............................................GOD. in near future there are going to be anti cruise missiles too.that is why the cruise missiles are so dangerous there are only four nations possessing the capability of a nuclear cruise missile the nations are U.S.A.,Russia,France,India. because these countries have the fastest cruise missiles in the world ... the patriot of the Americans, the Marcelo of the french ,and the BrahMos of the combined Indian-Russian.
374326
Under Bush anything is a possibility.\nProbably even nuking them.\nFrom Bush's track record, we can see that he cares less for humn lives that are non-American.\nHe would certainly try to nuke them if the need arises.\nPakistan has no reason to nuke Iran. Wrong guess.\nthis might brighten up some of your participants....read on:-\n\nDecember 28, 2005  \nNuking Iran With\nthe UN's Blessing \nOnly the American people can stop it  \nby Jorge Hirsch \nIn the "global war on terror," Iran is the next target, having been designated by the U.S. State Department [.pdf] as "the most active state sponsor of terrorism" in the world. The United Nations has given its blessing, and the U.S. will fill in the blanks. \n\nBefore we analyze this, however, let us ask ourselves: why not Florida instead? In fact, Florida should be way ahead on the list. Family considerations should not play a role in U.S. policy decisions. \n\nLet's compare the cases. For Florida: \n\n\nAt least 15 of the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers had Florida connections. \nThirteen of the 19 were in Florida before Sept.11. \nEight of the hijackers took flying lessons in Venice, Fla. \nFive of the hijackers trained in Florida gyms. \nTwo of the hijackers got drunk in a Hollywood, Fla. bar a few days before the attack. \nInstead, the connections between 9/11 and Iran are much more tenuous, according to the 9/11 Commission: \n\n\n"Senior al-Qaeda operatives and trainers traveled to Iran to receive training in explosives" in 1993. \n"Iran facilitated the transit of al-Qaeda members into and out of Afghanistan before 9/11, and some of these were future 9/11 hijackers." \n"We have found no evidence that Iran or Hezbollah was aware of the planning for what later became the 9/11 attack." \nThe 9/11 hijackers used planes, not explosives. So I very much hope that the Pentagon is revising its Nuclear Strike Plan. A precision-guided missile with a nuclear warhead – or a low-yield nuclear gravity bomb – should be effective in vaporizing both aboveground and underground facilities of Huffman Aviation School in Venice, Fla., with minimal collateral damage. \n\nThe fact is, terrorists do not need "state sponsors" to do their job. The 9/11 hijackers lived in the U.S., rented apartments, opened bank accounts, got drivers licenses, rented cars, took English lessons, had jobs, joined gyms, learned the needed flying skills, bought their box-cutter knives, and blew themselves up in the good old United States. And so will the next terrorists who strike us. \n\nFurthermore, some of the 9/11 hijackers lived and studied in Hamburg, Germany. And they met in Madrid. So are Hamburg and Madrid next on the strike list? \n\nDoes anybody really believe that the "training camps" in Afghanistan played any significant role in 9/11? Can somebody please explain what exactly the 9/11 hijackers learned at those training camps that they couldn't learn elsewhere? \n\nDoes anybody really believe that the purported meeting, which in fact never took place, of Mohamed Atta and an Iraqi intelligence officer in Prague would have played a significant role even if it had taken place? \n\nYet we are embarked in a "global war of terror" in response to the 9/11 attacks that has led to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and is about to lead to a U.S. nuclear attack against Iran. \n\nBecause make no mistake, an aerial attack on Iran that will include low-yield nuclear bombs is the next step in the "global war on terror," unless something extraordinary happens to derail it. \n\nThe "Legal" Framework \n\nThe United States invaded Iraq under the pretext of enforcing UN Security Council resolution (UNSCR) 1441. Bush stated in his address to the nation on March 17, 2003, \n\n"On November 8th, the Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 1441, finding Iraq in material breach of its obligati