who do you think is better and why...?
610953
Hayden Christensen is definitely cuter... and wayyyy younger... but as far as acting and talent I've only seen them each in one movie, so who knows. Who cares, though? Hayden's cuter and younger! yay shallow people!
539977
Which one do you like better?
329965
Chris all the way! by the way.. thanks for the comment earlier!
955435
You got to go with KG, he gets more assists and is a better all around player in my opinion.
970311
Guillani. I think he has a better temperament for the job. Other than that, both are highly qualified.
1092242
I think your question is a bit harsh?\n\nBeckham never said the was the best player in the world but he can probably spell better than you. \n\nBesides Gerard is better.
734981
HAHA fair enough. I would say Rocky, because he carries himself better. He could take a better hit and last longer. And he doesn't have a lisp lol.
895184
kennison.  i like him better\nb
476974
i like johan alot and hes my g. its tough to argue against him as being the best lhp in the game today, but im not going to say its johan because there is a pitcher even better than him and his name is Francisco Liriano. You may or may not have heard of Liriano because he is currently a rookie, but i really see johan in him and more. He is much more of the power pitcher than johan, and he overwhelms his hitters as good as santana. he has a better k/bb and k/9 rating and he is electric. liriano is taller and stronger, which makes him more intimidating, plus he is younger. he will be an allstar and a superstar soon if he isnt already. did i mention they are both on the twins?!?! thats wicked
1133028
BJ Penn is BETTER!!!  I think they both will do a rematch and Penn will make sure this match wont end up in the judges hands.
749651
thats a tough one. crosby has a better supporting cast of players to help him.  But ovechkin i think is an over all better player.  they are both very good players
138139
i will say Pele & Zidane...Deciding b/w G. Best & Pele is kind of hard so...but with Zizou & Roni, both are technically excellent (remember at their best! i know Zidane is done)..but Zidane has more stamina & a better team spirit. Roni as one will say in jargoon, chooses his matches.
576150
john terry maybe marginally better than puyol considering the fine job he has been doing for chelsea for some long time now. yes, questions may arise but i go for terry.
841067
your question is going to draw a lot of spite from people who disagree with you.  But I'll say Williams would be my choice between the two and here's the reasons why: As my PG as a floor general i would take Williams, yes Paul is quick but Deron is the smarter player. For scoring Paul easy. For defense it's williams again because Paul is too small and Willams can pound against big gaurds like Baron Davis and Billups. Stats that some where basing thier arguements on don't work Deron plays on a better team in a tougher conference so it's harder to fill a stat sheet and Paul's team bit/bites so it's easy to shine. The only way to really look at this and say stats matter would be if both players played on the same team. Since that's not the case it is as subjective as saying pizza is better then burritos... What you prefer would determine how loud you yell for or against.  It comes down to who fits better on your team and the way they play- for me that would be Williams.
355751
I don't think any is better than the other, there both great and have alot of talent...God bless
1122618
Tiger consistently hits better shots (shot shapes, recovery shots)\nPhil has hit some of the most amazing shots ever, but has also had to hit those shots because of poor previous shots.\n\nPhil is certainly great, but I will have to go with Tiger. His game elevates when needed. Once Phil gets some more time with Rick Smith and Dave Pelz and refines him game, I think he will be the one to watch for many years.
552999
They're both so good,it's too hard to choose between the 2 of them. Sorry,lol.