What do the  comments made by thepresident of Russia imply about the Bush administration?
601112
That Bush isn't to be trusted. All of America knows that's true why shouldn't the Russians. Putin knows Bush's policies are failing in America, that is a sign of a brilliant man and leader. I read some comments from above and they aren't very smart. Putin has total cooperation from the split states such as the Ukraine and the Baltic States, so their military might is still a major problem. George Bush is crying wolf to a ex KGB officer, and I don't think he is listening to him either.
947690
A very calm experienced manager,America needs a man like that in Kremlin to have good stable relations.Boris[Vodka Monster] Yeltsin would have made the things far worst if he was still in office.He sold the Russia to the Oligarch Mob which Putin recovered back very calmly.
1110287
To have something to complain about. For example:\n\nIraq's arsenal of weapons of mass destruction was not captured by US forces who heroically brought down Saddam Hussein's regime three years ago this week. It vanished before they arrived.\nIsraeli intelligence reported before the US-led invasion that starting in late summer 2002 Saddam's WMD arsenal was shipped by truck convoy to Syria. Recently, documents seized from Iraq after the fall of the regime were released to the public. Those documents revealed that under the direct command of former Russian prime minister and KGB boss Yevgeny Primakov, Russian Spetnaz forces oversaw the transfer of Iraq's WMD to Syria ahead of the US-led invasion. These reports have been corroborated by Saddam's Air Vice Marshall General Georges Sada.\n\nSo rather than being destroyed or secured, Saddam's WMD arsenal was simply moved from one rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations to another rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations.\n\nOf course, American Media will NOT report this, it will prove Bush right, and then they would look stupid.\n\nMichael Moore, thanks:\nFriday, 23 June 2006 \nWhen News Lies \n\n\nWHEN NEWS LIES\nMedia Complicity and The Iraq War\n\n\nBy Danny Schechter, The News Dissector\n\n\n\nA new book from Danny Schechter offers an up to date indictment of the role media played in promoting and misreporting the war on Iraq. It is an analysis of how and why the media got it wrong that pinpoints the failures of journalism and the collusion of media companies with the Bush Administration. The author of EMBEDDED: Weapons of Mass Deception (Prometheus 2003), an account of the TV coverage of the US invasion, returns with a more comprehensive, updated and insider look at the media complicity that Schechter argues "made the war possible."\n\n\n\n"Most of the anti-war movement focused on the crimes of the Bush Administration ignoring the mainstream media, its far more effective accomplice," says former network producer Danny Schechter (ABC, CNN). "The government orchestrated the war while the media marketed it. You couldn't have one without the other."\n\n\n\nWHEN NEWS LIES includes the feature -length DVD of the prize-winning film WMD (Weapons of Mass Deception). The book will also include the complete script as well as a discussion of the challenges of exposing media with media with a documentary. It chronicles the media war fought alongside the military campaign and the struggle to stand up for truth. \n\nSource(s):\nGoogle it:\n\nSaddam, WMD, Spetsnaz\n\nhttp://www.wmdthefilm.com/mambo/index.ph...
555778
KKKarl Rove wrote all that crap that didn't mean anything. Bush had a ear piece in as always, didn't you see it? The speech was just more Bush crap that wont prove to be the truth later on. I don't believe anything he says, it will be a great day when he is gone.
1007399
The people the listen to her have let her go to far.\nThis is because the are special people.\nThis might help explain:\n\n\nYOU ARE A SPECIAL PEOPLE CONS\n\nYou supported bush, but in time, you will come to\nrealize how he targeted you for deception.\n\nYou were specially picked because of the attributes\nyou possess: fear, ignorance, arrogance, belligerence,\nbigotry, and low self-esteem. Bush's political\nstrategists calculated that the people most easily\nmisled and controlled are the ones who fit your\nprofile, so they crafted their propaganda just for\nyou.\n\nHe got your support by making you feel better about\nyour personal flaws. He told you to wave the flag\nbecause your bigotry is nothing be ashamed of, and to\nthump the bible because your ignorance is a virtue.\nYou should cherish your hatefulness and\nsmall-mindedness as they are family values. You are\nnot society's rejects, but rather, you are higher on\nthe ladder than certain other people. Right-wing radio\npoints them out so that you know who to hate to feel\nbetter about yourself.\n\nHe feeds you crap about "imminent threat",\n"patriotism", "spreading freedom", and "flowers and\ncandy". He's only tossing you a bone because he knows\nhe's going to be asking you for a hefty sacrifice\nsoon. He repeats meaningless, mind-numbing platitudes\nlike "Freedom is not free!" and "We're fighting them\nthere so we don't have to fight them here!" You fell\nfor it.\n\nBy now, it should be apparent that the invasion of\nIraq was a shameless oil grab. We're there because the\nrich, powerful, and greedy of this country, people who\nyou have nothing to do with, want to control that part\nof the world's oil resources for decades to come, and\nthey're using your tax dollars and your children's\nblood to do it. Over a hundred thousand people,\nAmerican and Iraqi, are dead because of it, and the\ndepleted uranium left behind will ensure that tens of\nthousands more die afterwards. You call that\nliberation? Not even that many people died when Saddam\nHussein tried to grab Kuwait's oil fields years ago.\n\nYes, you are a special people, cons. You do not\npossess patriotism, a love of America, or any of those\nhigh-minded ideals as you would like to believe. You\npossess the qualities that allowed bush to hijack your\nfree will to do his bidding. You were used, and he did\nit by playing to the personal shortcomings that most\npeople try to hide. Like Samuel L. Jackson's character\nat the end of the movie Unbreakable, you become aware,\nonly after the fact, of the disgraceful role that you\nwere destined to play. You will come to realize that\nyou are history's bad guy. Like the McCarthyites or\nthe brownshirts, you will serve both as a symbol of\nshame and a warning to future generations. You truly\nare a special people.GOD HELP US ALL,AND AMERICA.
682026
No shame indeed.\n\nLook at this quote, from Mr. Halliburton : \n\nVice President Dick Cheney, in remarks that caused a stir in neighboring Russia, accused President Vladimir Putin today of restricting the rights of citizens and said that "no legitimate interest is served" by turning energy resources into implements of blackmail. (http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/3840352.html)\n\n"from religion and the news media to advocacy groups and political parties, the government has unfairly and improperly restricted the rights of the people."...says guy who got re-elected due to the Religious Right, and who pushed for passage of the Patriot Act among other "restrictive" laws.\n\nAND WAIT FOR THE KILLER QUOTE : "And no one can justify actions that undermine the territorial integrity of a neighbor, or interfere with democratic movements." Yes, real quote. I kid you not.\n\no_o!
649803
I don't know. It's in the "bushisms" book, available at your local library (they really do have it). Then you can read the quote in context. You will better understand the quote when you better understand what he 'meant to say'. Oh well, he's got two more years to work on making a comprehensible sentance.
847136
Bush senior was the head of the CIA during the Carter administration.\n\nDuring this time the CIA was illegally selling arms to the contra rebels in Nicaragua and giving the money to Iran to keep the hostages that they took from the US embassy.\n\nAt the same time the Republicans were accusing the Democrats of not doing anything to get the hostages released thus swaying our own presidential election allowing Regan to get into office.
691612
The whole speech was a metaphorical comparison of the "cold war" to Bush's "war on terror".  His point was that by America's being able to claim victory in the cold war Truman was vindicated, and by extension his "war on terror" would be vindicated by its eventual success.  However, that is probably unlikely, whoever gets elected Dem. or Rep. is probably going to drop Iraq like a hot potato (with no e).  So, its just Bush trying to make himself feel better because he knows he isn't really popular in the polls.  Whether he really has oil interests in the region or represents them is another question entirely, and one I personally cannot answer with any definitive evidence either way, but then, Cheney does have well known ties to Haliburton.
6832
Although I am 99.999% sure that they are not currently CIA agents, it would not surprise me in the slightest to learn that they had been on the payroll at one time.  But then, what is wrong with that.  Times change, enemies become allies, allies become enemies.  Russia was an ally during WWII, but then our mortal enemy right after.  I believe that during the Russian occupation of Afghanistan that Usama was heavily funded by us because he helped fight a greater enemy.  It isn't that we agreed with his policies then, it is just that he was a lesser threat than Russia was.  Same kind of situation with Iraq and Iran.  A the time, Saddam was the lesser threat than was Iran.  Remember, enemy of my enemy can sometimes be my temporary freind.
961634
Ask George W. Bush personally.
959684
Bush says he's going to let Rove go \nbecause he won't leave his \nspecial reporter alone. \n\nJeffy is all mine cries Bush!!!
564272
It means that when the President speaks on any subject, people listen. I have no respect for George W. Bush, but a decent President could affect American society by speaking out intelligently on many issues over which he or she has no direct authority.
198873
I believe that the foreign policy of his administration, their policy of pre-emptive war and their economics are dangerous to Americans and the world.  I also believe that this administration, though seemingly incompetent, is very aware of what their actions bring to the rest of the world.
289159
He has the backing of Russia.
321501
Well, they are both fans of domestic spying and striking countries that pose no threat. The Republicans support the establishment of an American empire, much in the same way the Nazis strove for global domination.Bush is doing everything in his power to extend executive powers. In fact, Sandra Day O'Connor recently said that the U.S. is moving towards  a dictatorship. When a Republican-appointed former Supreme Court justice says something like that, you know we're in trouble!
375486
What you try to mean is this:\n\n Since George Washington (Americas 1st president) up to President Clinton (the one before the former), the United States has been in debt for as much as 1.3 trillion.\n\nOn the other hand, only Bush himself has put the United States into as much debt equalling a total of about 3 trillion. And he's still got a couple of more time in office.\n\nHonestly, this does not concern me at all because I am not a national of this country. Personally, I believe Bush has it's good and it's bad. We have to acknowledge the fact that maybe if it were not for him, perhaps any terrorist would be at the reach of nuclear weapons just as Iran may be able to start a Nuclear war to any nation.\n\nI certainly believe that he might be being too agressive and that handling so many issues such as: Chinas economy, unhappy Immigrants in the US, A ridiculous costly wall being built on its borders, Iraqi War, Osama Bin Laden's reappearance, Iran nuclear power, and un happy people with High Oil prices (just to name a few) is putting much pressure into the country's well being (economically speaking).\n\nNext Election will be tough, The United States definately needs a president to follow up Bush's "balls" and aggressiveness/stupidity (whatever you want to call it) to keep it rolling. Just remember Hitler. He was doing great until he decided to invade Russia and do so much Bull $hit everywhere in europe.