Which of the following sentences has a dangling modifer?
610301
2.  "of course"\n\n3.  "He hates to be late." It is assuming an emotion, which is not proper formal writing. \n\n4. "With the proper help..."  I think... I can't really remember my list of prepositions. I'm pretty sure "with" is a preposition, but "although" may be one too. Maybe "although" is a conjunction. Go with "With the proper help..." \n\n1. I'm assuming "By the light of the moon, I tripped over a rock."  This is just a guess, because the sentence doesn't sound right to me. It's been a while since I worked with dangling modifiers.
529025
I think this is a case of a writer, or his editor, searching for a word and not coming up with the word he intended. I think he was looking for "tapped," which can mean selected, but his mind gave him "tabbed" instead. It's not the making of a noun into a verb that is the problem. That's done all the time in informal English. It's just not a good word choice.
974163
None of them.  \n\nA, C, and D are grammatically incorrect.\n\nB is wrong because the pronoun is not capitalized correctly.
394511
The past participle of jump is jumped.\n\nMaybe you would die if you jumped, but if you do jump, I couldn't let you do it knowing your grammar was incorrect.\n\nGood luck.\n\nYou crazy, cheeky wee person.
469519
Simple Present\nSimple Past\nFuture\n\nYou can find more info online at: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/esl/esltensverb.html#presperf
712363
It is not a sentence...\n\nBeneath the noted universal concerns there lies a distinctive world view.\n\n Or better yet use a semi colon after the word preceeding but ..then replacing it with however and a comma...like this \n\n" ; however, beneath these universal concerns there lies a distinctive worldview."
1004580
This doesn't really make any sense to me.\nHere are those words in sentences.\nI had it.\nWe went to see it.\nIf we go to it you will see it.
467223
left\n\nExamples:\n\nI will leave. or I am leaving. -> I left.  or  I have left.\n\nWill he leave? -> Has he left?
186597
It's a shame the asker didn't include more of the surrounding text from this article so it could be analyzed more closely.  \n\nAnyhow, grammarians will concur that the structure:  \n\n"...active surveillance and robust peer intervention among high-risk groups such as female sex workers had had an impact in the South..." ,\n\nIS, technically, correct.  Sacramento Dweller was correct in identifying this seemingly awkward grammatical structure as a matter of tense.  Sentences utilizing this particular structure generally fall under the category of "Conditional Sentences."  Sentences featuring the 'had had' syntax are classified as "The Third Conditional," or "Conditional Type Three," and can generally be diagnosed by analyzing them for similarities with following structural formulae:\n\n(The Type 3 Conditional / Third Conditional Formula:)\n\n" IF + <insert past perfect tense verb> + <insert perfect conditional tense verb> = RESULT OF SUPPOSED CONDITIONS.*\n\n*~NOTE:  RESULT(S) of the supposed conditions usually resemble one of the following two structures, depending on when events occurred:  \n\n(1.) Result:  <insert simple present or past tense verb to express an obvious, or predictable fact / outcome>\n\n(2.) Result:  <insert modal verb  + simple present or past tense verb to express a known fact / outcome >\n\nEXAMPLE #1:  "If you had had proper training as an assassin, we would not be in this situation..."\n\nEXAMPLE #2:  "If I'd had proper training as an assassin, you probably wouldn't be here to complain."\n\n(Notice how in EXAMPLE #2, the contractions 'I'd' is used instead of saying, 'I had had' to illustrate the terms of the condition being discussed, though still allowing the reader to ascertain and understand the time-frame and sequence in which events occcurred?)\n\nRules for proper usage of the "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure state that the structures are 'to be used when talking about unreal, or "hypothetical" situations occurring in the past.'  That means, the related events DID NOT 'ACTUALLY' HAPPEN in the past.  Sentences utilizing this structure are almost always phrased to reckon, "If circumstances were different, what could / would have this been like?"  \n\nThe expression of time / tense in this [third] variety of conditional sentence structure IS identified as the past, and indicates that an action was completed "in" the past.  The condition and / or result, therefore, cannot logically be fulfilled because the action in the "IF" clause never actually happened.  Action in "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure is almost ALWAYS characterized by the quality of being absurd, and impossible to achieve.\n\nTense and Terminology?\n\n-Simple Present Tense:  Expresses a fact, habit/routine, or ability.\n\n-Simple Past:  Implies that the action happened before and is not happening anymore.\n\n-Past Perfect (Pluperfect) Tense:  Relates that an action or event ended prior to another action or event.\n\n-Present Perfect (Continuous) [Past-composite] Tense:  Indicates either events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Perfect (Conditional) Tense: Relates varying degrees of certianty or uncertainty about events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Modal Verbs:  incorporated with other verbs to illustrate the notion of possibility, impossability, necessity or other degree of probability.
949096
Stop! Halt! Shut up! Drop dead! Go away!\n\nhmmmm. I would say yes, a sentence can be both.
465570
This is similar to a very old example used in many grammar books to show the importance of punctuation to the meaning of a sentence. The original sentence was:\nA woman without her man is nothing (not "without a  man").\nDepending on where the punctuation is inserted, the sentence can have two different meanings:\nA woman, without her man, is nothing.\nA woman: Without her, man is nothing.
622435
C.  The tree was planted by Mary.\n\nIn every other sentence, the subject performs the action expressed in the verb.  The subject of sentence "C" is TREE.  The tree recieves the action- not performs the action, so it is passive. \n\nActive voice would read:  Mary planted the tree.
896262
Grammatically, they're both correct.\n\nIf you're using this sentence in some kind of composition, your biggest problem is that the sentence has an inconsistent tone. The middle of the sentence has the sophisticated "atypical dialects," while the beginning and end are much more conversational and less descriptive.\n\nBut if you're asking me to pick, I would say the second.
305730
"I wish I were."  It's the subjunctive mood.  Any time you express uncertainty like that - as in you're not sure if you're going - you have to use subjunctive.
45919
it can either mean "past" or "string".
1022563
This means the sentences are in the passive tense, rather than the preferred, active tense.\n\nExample:\n\n"This was the one that I had wanted." - passive\n\n"I wanted this one." - active\n\nMost of the time, active tense is preferred.
368520
Sentence B\nThe verb "looks" is linkning, therfore its complement is either a predicate nominative or predicate adjective.