DO KlLLERS REALLY DESERVE A LAST MEAL?
596695
It is only to assuage our own guilt that they are given a last meal. In reality we are no better off than the killers themselves if we have to resort to dealing death in retribution. think about this, how is killing different for the legal system? What are the alternatives to the death penalty? Why are we not using and advertising their usage more?---It really makes you wonder about the cruelty and the overall lack of compassion in our societies judicial system.--"You kill someone in the state of Texas, We'll kill you back" Ron White--\n--Food for Thought--
716313
Muge, instead you should have asked these people if would they eat there own babies ( and many would ) you are asking your question to mostly ignorant people who have no understanding of these issues...who live on a diet of McD and KFC and whose brains are riddled with dormant mad cow virus.\n\nThey have no better understanding than Korean puppy torturers. If it's not human it's food. Post your question where more intelligent people might read it.....Carnivores are cruel.
1016461
Hey! If this person works nights at a Pizza Hut, and sees his colleagues all night long, there is no reason to make him/her spend more time with them.  He/she needs their rest and if they're anything like me, they don't want to hang out with a bunch of minimum wage losers so they can be reminded of how miserably they failed themselves and their families.  Fellowship you say? Misery does not always love company.  If you really   care for this person, you'd help them find a real job.
1106798
thats a really good question. i have wondered the exact same thing. i personally believe that these people are probably getting their food for free because of the fact that they choose to stay there for hours without food. i was surprised last week when those ladies walked out of the restaurant. they are probably just people solicited off the streets. who knows?
73464
I am in favor of executions for the worst crimes.  For those that think it is "barbaric" to execute a murderer, do you really think the murderer was gentle with his victims?  Do you think the muderer gave the victim time to be with their family and say a tender goodby, like they get before their execution?  I guess you believe the murderer also prepared a  nice last meal for his victim too, right?  And since most executions in the US are now carried out by lethal injection, nice, painless, and peaceful, I guess you believe the muder victim died the same way?\n\nYes, I think the executions should be made public.  Nobody that does not want to attend has to.  And the criminals should lose all of the above perks that they get.  They certainly should not get more than their victims got.
180671
Yes, it is much better than giving scumbags like the one mentioned in the question a lifetime of freebies.\n\nThe only thing wrong with it is they are given a much more humane death than they gave their victims.\n\nVictims didn't get a chance to say "goodbye" to their families, or a last meal, why should the killers?
566611
only if eaten.\nHave you ever saw the movie "see no evil"? \nThe dude shoves a cell phone down a girls throat she she chokes to death
792370
yes.obviously if they have done it by knowldge.if they have not done any mistake so what asking apoligy from any elder person is called giving respect. its not a shame.
362607
Forget Proper! Go based on the quality of the procedure itself, and the temperment of the person that did it! \nI think there is too much put into what you are "supposed" to leave, that people in customer service, waitresses etc, forget their manners, just figure they are OWED that tip. Screw that!
695089
It's selfishness bordering on solipsism to care about what happens to you after you die.  Of course they can eat me.\n\nThough after they eat me, they're still five starving people. I suppose they could draw straws to see who they have to kill to eat next. OH! Or each cut off a limb and share that, so they'd all survive.
198941
Serves them right.  Too gone for too long, I'd say
959133
Yes.\n\nLegally you can walk away with some of your pride and dignity intact and allow them to spend the rest of their lives keeping an eye on each other because they each know the other can't be trusted.\n\nHonestly, why would you want to devote even one more minute of your time or energy on these two even if you could "punish" them?  It's unhealthy.
1104210
Take a tip...? \nit might be your last one next time !\nLOL...
277132
Well, it depends.  In food, it means it is past it's expiration for freshness and shouldn't be consumed.  If you mean as used as a description of a person it means that they are given anything they desire whether or not they have earned or deserved it in an excessive manner (materialistic).  Usually these people have unnatural expectations that will never be satisified AND a spirit of entitlement that will alienate themselves from the rest of society.  Sad really.
438380
no, if I am in the brain dead situation I would want them to harvest my organs after my family says goodbye.  It would beat the way they stop feeding you and let you starve to death.
9736
Yes. Unless someones not home. We usuallly wait for an hour or so but we do have a deadline kind of time after which we are free to have our meals without waiting for a person. Our's is a closely knit family.
631960
Yes I would.  My granny who lived in the doublewide in the middle of nowhere (from whence and from whom I draw my name), would get meals on wheels when she was older and sick with cancer.  Not only was the food very welcome, but the regular company was nice too.\n\n:) Thanks for asking JuJu!