Do you believe the new Pentagon footage..?
612226
Watch this video\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848
396213
That video, as well as many other on that subject can be seen at my link. I tend to view these as propaganda. Of course, I view everything that comes out of the White House on this subject propaganda, too. There are facts that will never be known. There are too many discrepancies on both sides of the argument to make an informed decision one way or the other...
460707
ok i've watched loose change four times or so now, and spent way too much time reading on various websites, they make some convincing points...but then they ignore alot of stuff as well...like common sense.\n\ncould there be some conspiracy behind 911? yes there could be. is it these theories that are popularly being advanced currently on the web...no\n\nstart at the end and work your way forward: the point of 911 was to destroy some buildings.  there are easier ways for the government to pull this off than to.\nsecretly swap planes in the air for non-passenger drone places, fly two of them into buildings, which they already rigged with additional explosives, secretly land the planes, secretly kill the passengers, fake a plane crash at one location, get voice samples from passengers to load into a computer to produce fake phone calls to loved ones with, then swap one plane for a missle (never mind that some claim this was a smaller drone plane) fire it into the pentagon, get 100 or so people to claim they saw a plane(this is ignored by loose change which uses two of the four people that claimed to not have seen a plane) then run around real fast knocking over the light poles etc...loose change claims a plane couldn't knock over those lamp poles that way, but never tries to explain how they were knocked over, if we assume that not all 100+ witnesses were cia plants, then we have to wonder why no one went, "and there these guys ran around loosening all the bolts on those lamps and pushed them over and ran off! dam kids!"\n\nloose change and other sources also use alot of broadcasts from very early after the attacks took place during which there was alot of confusion about what happened, live news especially while something is happening doesn't always get things 100% correct and uses alot of speculation to fill in time while they figure things out.\n\nloud thuds of things like, say upper floors falling into lower ones, could no doubt sound very much like other explosions going off.\n\nthe list goes on and on, but this post is getting rather long.\n\nok so lets face it, thats one complicated plan to bring down some buildings.  you could just blow them up, blame who ever you wanted to, say you are investigating how security could have been breached to such an extent, and leave it at that.\n\nits just too complicated of a conspiracy, that would take way way too many people to keep their mouths shut.
702565
You prefer the loose change dribble I see.\n\nhttp://michellemalkin.com/archives/005885.htm\n\nhttp://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/photos/index.html#parts
1075311
yes. he lied about seeing the 1st plane hit on cnn but the footage didnt air for another 14 hours. the fbi, cia, nas & dod all had info in the hijackers. their locations, pasts, their financing, their intentions & the training they were getting. its all been documented.  http://scotthortonshow.com/
1163400
considering that one of the first things i saw on the page said, "Proof Blue Screen Technology Faked 2nd Plane "  i know its crap.\ni'm tired of writing about the 911 conspiracy stuff and these conspiracy ideas floating around right now are just getting more and more outrageous.  are there some questions that need to be answered about 911? yes probably are a few....but these questions have NOTHING to do with: now blue screened planes, planes swapped secretly for missiles and drones, faked plane crashes, secret voice sampled passengers to fake phone calls home, secret landing fields, breakaway light poles, hundreds to thousands of planted "witnesses" and fake work crews planting explosives.\nthis stuff is either some strange disinformation campaign, or someone trying to make a buck off people who don't trust the government and can't think.
132360
The moon landings were real and there is overwhelming evidence for that fact. The "evidence" the hoax side always presents are truly laughable for those that have a little more knowledge in their brains than those that obsess about that Fox tv mokumentary. \nThey say that when the flag moves in some footage it is "proof" that it did so because it was blowing in the studio. What one can clearly see is the flag moving because an astronaut is moving it. \nAlso the absence of stars in the photos are supposed to be "proof" it is a fake. Anyone with a little knowledge of how a camera works can tell you why there are no stars. The moon is pretty bright. Right? In fact on the surface of the moon the sun shines twice as bright as it does on earth during the brightest of days. Now imagine standing in such intense light. If they had set their cameras to expose the, by comparison, extremely faint stars instead of the surface of the moon the film in the cameras would have recieved so much light the film would have melted, ruining the cameras. The purpose of the Apollo missions were to take pictures of the moon. Not the stars. We can take pictures of them from earth. Also stars would have been the easiest thing in the world to fake it the landing had been a fake. With a $25 billion budget you would think NASA could have afforded a script supervisor...\nI could go on and on and on but I have answered this question so many times. I wish people could just stop asking it. The only ones that claim the landings were fake are those that are really bored and have way too much time on their hands.
350483
Come on what do you think check out some web pages on what happened at the pentagon and then you tell me!!
68173
Yes..I have seen the vid...makes ya go hmmm...certainly an out of ordinary video..it was seen and recorded in Mexico...there have been numerous reports...and until last year no video..It is truly hard to say what it is...but it is very strange...almost like a jet pack...but..who really knows for now..I prefer to keep an open mind on things and not assume until more proof is shown..but as I said..the vid is interesting to say the least.
1114376
you again?, well just in case you didn't get them the first time:\n\nhttp://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html\nhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html\nhttp://wtc.nist.gov/
610908
I watched the video a few of months ago.  After a couple of years of some research I believe the majority of our politicians are completely in the dark as is most of the nation.  \n\nI do, however, believe there is an international conglomerate that uses many of the world governments and their citizens as pawns to establish a New World Order.  Some call them the Elite European Bankers or the Illuminati.  They are real and obviously do exist.\n\nAs for many of the "terorist" acts that have occured in the past, including Sept 11 and the Muir Building in OK City, the evidence is almost overwhelmingly blatant that what really happened is not what the government and the media want us to believe.  \n\nPeople say I'm crazy.  Maybe I am.  Maybe I'm not.
458023
plane plane plane plane , I checked out the video here , if you repeat something enough times,enough time goes by.... It was very interesting well worded but incorrect. All the statements were taken out of context. I have read the full conversations with living victims and witnesses, go over your memory of the day,a plane hit . Some of the photos here were taken days,weeks later. The truth is a plane hit with real people on it,real names faces,not a missile. What is real scary? It has been 60+ years since the concentration camps, some have been saying this documented horror never happened. We have something similar here but with misinformation and considerably sooner. Sometimes a duck is just a duck. This nightmare had an author and it was not the US government,nor most of its Muslim citizens,Israel,or a missile, unless you include an airplane used as a missile.\nPS what would really settle every ones mind would be to release the videos. I understand why they can't yet but in time it would be wise, it will end this insult and conjecture.
1120454
as much as i hate to admit it...i believe its very possible. i mean the evidence even makes 9/11 look like a conspiracy. and i hate to believe it and im not 100% sure were i stand with that but lets just say pieces eerily fall into place
29237
This is a very true possibility because there is actual proof of the government hiding what happend on that day... if you recall a plane had also hit the pentagon as well as the towers right... negative there was no plane wreckage at that site. what had actualy hit it was a missle. and the government wants us to believe that it was a plan to not cause panic.
1093022
no, it isn't. i was at the pentagon that day and it wasn't a plane. where is the tapes in question on loose change?
397929
Thats not the greatest film Ive ever seen to be honest. But its not bad. This documentary, is a much, much better one.\n\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848\n\nIt talks not only about the pentagon, but also what really happened at the WTC towers and Shanksville PA. If you think what you saw in your movie there was mind-blowing, watch this one. I was stunned by the end. Great film. Thank you and keep spreading the word!\n\n\npeace
627907
I'm very weary of the conspiracy theories. As one of the people who watched the plane go into the Pentagon (literally watched it hit), it makes me very annoyed to see how many people think so many other people could be wrong, imaging things, or a part of a conspiracy. Maybe the theory would be credible if no one was around to watch.  But between NYC and DC/Arlington, both in the tail end of rush hour commuter traffic, you'd have to get about 50,000 people to agree to this conspiracy. I find it insulting and I am immediately annoyed by anyone who actually thinks these web sites are reporting the truth.