How does telekinetic energy relate to physics?
605330
well, if an object is moving, there must be some physical force applied to it - magnetic field, static electicity, pull from a sting, air pressure from a fan.
679319
Wow, Your question is so simple, but it's answer is researched for many decades now. \n\nAnyway, Any kind of energy (and the force is the mean in which the energy can be detected) requires the carrier, which is, well, material. Material carrier contains some kind of energy, in a certain amount. When the carrier collides with a body, it gives it's energy away to the body. In case of two carriers collision, a certain reaction occurs, and as the result, there is anoter type of energy or the carriers get destroyed, and their energy goes into heat or light. \n\nThe way of calculating an amount of energy that certain carrier contains, is the aplication of Einstein's formula of equality of the mass and the energy. If You are aware of the energy inside some particle, You can foresee it's influence to another particle.\n\nThe only force that is not connected to the appropriate particle is gravity (although there are some speculations about existence of so called "gravitones", as carriers of gravital energy and representers of the gravity force itself). \n\nThat unique force, which is not understood yet, makes Your question very heavy. Scientists from all over the world have been trying for more then 70 years to make the unified force theory, which could be used for calculations of any kind of force, with equaly accurate result. This would be named "The great unified theory of forces". So, let'hope that this theory will be defined soon, and that You will understand the duality force-matter better, by using it.
987744
Depending on what you have to use it for I agree whit Answers, but it isn’t as simple as that and it is really a theory, but here goes:\nWe live in a 3-dimensional world, which physics calls "3-space." But there is also spacetime, or 4-space, or the "4th dimension." Then suddenly comes this amazing new knowledge that time itself is actually compressed energy. And it is energy which is compressed by exactly the same factor by which matter is considered compressed energy: the speed-of-light-squared!\nSo we have a new companion to the famous E=mc2. It is now paired with E=tc2 (where t is actually "delta-t," or change in time). Or (amaze your family and friends and) say:\n"E equals em-cee-squared"\nand\n"E equals delta-tee-cee-squared" \nI am not fully up to speed whit all this part of physics but I think this is what you are asking about !
974804
It won't work.  You can look at it this way:\n\nOne of the basic laws of physics is Conservation of Energy.  You can't create energy, nor is energy lost.  It is always constant, but it may change form.  Let me give several examples.\n\nThe energy associated with a swinging pendulum changes from kinetic (moving) energy at the bottom of the swing to potential energy at the top of the swing.  Back and forth, kinetic energy, potential energy, kinetic energy, potential energy, etc.  The swing of the pendulum does slowly die down, but that is due to the gradual transfer of kinetic energy to the surrounding air in the form of heat.\n\nIn the second example, the kinetic energy of a moving car is converted to thermal energy (heat) when you hit the brakes.  That's why your brakes get hot if you've been doing a lot of braking.  Of course, to get the car moving in the first place, the engine converts chemical energy from gasoline to thermal energy, which expands the gases in the pistons, pushing on the pistons to make the mechanical energy that turns the wheels.\n\nBack to your problem.  To charge a battery, the energy must come from somewhere.  The amount of energy coming from your voice is small, and certainly the amount of energy picked up by a microphone is much smaller, since most of the energy goes right on past the microphone.  It would take a very strong voice and a lot of talking to charge a battery, even if the charging circuit were perfect with no losses.\n\nNow, if your voice could turn a windmill.........
43971
Da_vinci's answer is partly correct but it confuses force, power and energy. Energy is the integral of power over time, or more simply, if power is constant, energy is power * time. Kinetic energy can also be expressed as .5*M*V^2, M being mass and V being velocity.\nDa_vinci's example illustrates that since velocity is measured with respect to some reference, so is kinetic energy. Without a reference an accelerated object receives a velocity change but the kinetic energy change cannot be defined. Similarly, without a reference, decelerating the object requires application of a force but does not recover any energy.
154756
It essentially means that mass and energy are really the same thing. The true energy of an object is its mass times the speed of light squared.\n\nYes it's still considered valid...and always will be.\n\nYou can read more about it here:\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E%3Dmc%C2%B2
393889
There is potential energy and kinetic energy.  Kinetic energy is the energy that something has from motion.  It's equation is E=1/2*m*v(squared) where m=mass and v=velocity.  For potential energy there are many forms.  Gravity E=mass*height*gravity, Electric and magnetic fields are potential energy.  And nuclear energy E=m*c(squared) which is the rest potential energy that anything with mass will have.  There is also energy from light E=h*nu, nu=frequency h=planck's constant.  There is also chemical potential energy which is the energy contained within molecules.
639084
You have succeded in controlling the movements of a pendulum because you were holding the pendulum and moving it with your hand (I've done it myself).\n\nTelekinetic powers don't exist, simple as that (though there are a lot of things mistaken for telekinesis and a lot of cheating).
967323
I have no physics degree but I think this might help you.  The answer will vary slightly depending on how contemporary the physics you use to answer it is but here is an inexact answer which should give you the general idea.\n\nSo the first thing you need to know is that all matter is not in existence already.  Matter is energy in a special form where it is sort of tied up in a wiggly knot.  You can see the relation between the two in einstein's\n\nm=E/c^2   (just an alternate form of E=mc^2)\n\nwhere\nm is mass(the property that quantifies matter)\nE is energy\nc is the speed of light\n\nSo from that there is an equivalence between matter and energy.  Matter can be created by knotting up energy, or destroyed by liberating the energy it was made with.\n\nSo, without going into really advanced physics, all mass is not conserved (meaning it can be created or destroyed) but energy IS conserved, there are all kinds of rules involved, but you can interchange the two of them.\n\nWhen you release energy as photons from matter you are converting some of that matter (tied up energy) into energy.  If you could weigh the matter that radiated the photons well enough you would be able to see that it weighs less!\n\nIn "pair production" a photon can create matter; an electron and positron.\n\nAnother example of energy being released from matter is nuclear fission.  Where the matter going in weighs more than the matter after the process.  The difference of mass is the energy freed from the uranium fuel.\n\nIt's like the photon is some of the stuff that the electron is made of... (this is a loose analogy) like some of the waggling rope that the electron knot was made of.  The electron knot can lose some excitement (energy) by shedding a section of the length of the rope(photon) which goes zipping away as pure electromagnetic energy.\n\nAll the abstractions like neutron, proton, electron, photon aren't really such absolute and fundamental things that are seperate and different from each other.  They are more like energy tied up in different ways.
556496
It's the theoretical relationship between energy and mass.  Albert Einstein's famous equation.  It is what nuclear power is based on.
162564
Potential Energy = stationary boulder on top of a building\nKinetic Energy = once the boulder is dropped and has speed
916732
Is relative to the amount of energy and object contains.
1133673
Not every technology means physics though most of it depends on Physics or the equipments designed with the help of principles of physics.\n\nEven while sleeping a lot many things keep of happening in our body which can be taken as physics working inside u. Inhaling and exhaling, pumping of heart, exchanges between cells, movement, force, inertia, energy are all concepts of physics
253836
Kinetic energy is energy that a body possesses as a result of its motion. In simple cases, it can be expressed mathematically as half an object's mass multiplied by its speed squared.\n\nThe etymology of kinetic energy is the Greek word for motion kinesis and the Greek word for active work energeia. Therefore the term 'kinetic energy' means through motion do active work. The terms kinetic energy and work and their present scientific meanings date back to the mid 19th century. Early understandings of these ideas can be attributed to Gaspard-Gustave Coriolis who in 1829 published the paper titled Du Calcul de l'effet des machines outlining the mathematics of kinetic energy.\n\nIt is formally defined as work needed to accelerate a body from rest to a speed v. Having gained this energy during its acceleration, the body maintains this kinetic energy unless its speed changes. Negative work of the same magnitude would be required to return the body to a state of rest from that speed.\n\n\nPotential energy is stored energy. The energy is stored by doing work against a force such as gravity, a spring in a clockwork motor, or even an electromagnetic field.
428921
This question has driven me buggy for years.  As you stated, energy is technically "the ability to do work", and the other two answers posted have given excellent examples.   Unfortunately,  all the examples in the world don't tell us what energy actually "is".   We can see the results, as in, "Ok,  so this atom trades that particle with that one and speeds up...lovely...",  but as to what actually happens noone knows.  Thanks to Einstein we know that matter is kind of a "frozen" form of energy, but that isn't much help either.  Perhaps the whole concept will end up being purely semantic,  rather as "time" is another way to say "motion".  Who knows?  Exciting, no???  But for now all we can do is observe what happens, calculate what ends up where - and continue to wonder  :)
390389
What is says is that energy and matter are one in the same.  Energy can be readily converted into matter, and vice versa.  The speed of light squared is the proportionality constant between energy and mass.
36280
Assuming it can't be II and III, I would say it's all of the above. The potential energy is converted into kinetic - the velocity increases and the height decreases. The KE + PE remains constant, because there is no work being done because there is no force here (besides gravity). However, the first depends on how you define mechanical energy - if it's kinetic energy, it's true. If not, I really don't know what it is.