what is the significant of the two hands?
599788
It's easier to swing from the trees.
611888
The link below is a pretty good analyzes of the two with out favoring one or the other.  It was written in a method that even I can understand so you should be fine ;-)
426072
with your hand, left or right, non-dominant for the stanger
338421
One one hand, yes. But on the other hand it's even smaller.
428645
Approximately 10% of the population classify themselves as being left-handed, with the percentage slightly higher for males and lower for females (McManus, 2002). Faurie and Raymond (2004) reviewed handedness frequency over more than ten thousand years (the oldest evidence coming from Palaeolithic ‘negative hand’ paintings), and determined that there was no difference between the oldest sample and the proportions found in university students today.\n\nHope that helps!
527661
there has to be some difference...if the minute had would be shorter than it would make it difficult to check with accuracy that it was on which minute at any moment...and the accuracy of hour hand is also clear due to minute hand...thats why it is so..
697367
yes but use both hands
856956
I think it originates from having used a finger from each hand to form an actual Cross. over time it became more practical to use two adjoining fingers on the same hand(the non dominant one) as it allowed the free hand to work on the task at hand
863740
when the big hand meets the little hand
100362
Answers : \n1. The 'second' hand of a watch since the other two are 'hour' hand and minute hand. \n\n2. Spare tyre
441269
15.2 Hands\n\nhttp://www.moviemistakes.com/film3411/corrections
125832
Left hand, ring finger =-)
855983
what about it?? two points thanks
209549
When the big hand touches the little hand
508619
the difference is the location of the tongue and hands
1035549
The lines on your hand are points that allow the predictable and comfortable folding of skin in response to the mobility of your hand. They are like gaps in the sidewalk that allow concrete to expand. They have no significance beyond showing you how you first moved your hands in your mother's womb as you were forming (now whether *that* has significance is hard to quantify). They will change to accomodate changes in physiology like when the musculature or tissues change underneath but normally won't change very much (hence leading to the bogus claims of the lines having mystical meaning....if they always changed, there'd be no way to claim the ability to read the future).
180015
There is a chart for the hand and a chart for the foot. See links below.