Which errors do you find in Catolich church?
611968
The error that I find in the Catholic church is not wanting people to use contraceptives. I mean if they don't want people to have abortions, well then let them prevent getting pregnant in the first place! Another thing is that prist shouldn't be celibate. Having sex is a part of life and I don't understand why priests in the Catholic church can't have wives? (I've seen some priests who looked mighty fine...wonder why they ever became priests!)
929009
It sounds like your head is in the right place, but your heart is not.  Despite the uneducated repetition of some anti-catholics on this forum, the Catholic Church was the church founded by Jesus Christ.  As much as they try to point out the sins of churchmen or misinterpret scriptures to their own destruction, the facts - as you stated - still remain.  The true church CANNOT apposticise - Jesus promised that it wouldn't.  And the sins of some clergy doesn't make doctrine untrue.\n\nAll this being said, you can't come at people with attacks.  It turns them away so that they will never listen to your arguement.  If you charitably answer their objections, maybe they will see the truth.\n\nFor those of you who think that the Catholic Church is not the original church - please visit my website.\n\nhttp://www.geocities.com/orthodox_doctrine/
319918
http://www.vroma.org/~hwalker/VRomaCatullus/Catullus.html\ngo through this link
833726
Be sure your sins will find you out fidgety.\nIt was competition day at the local golf club and the retired Colonel found himself paired up with the Bishop.\nThey set off and it wasn't long before the Colonel forgot who he was playing with and on missing a short putt exclaimed,"Bugger,I missed!"\nThe Bishop shook his head reproachfully.\nA little later,the same happened again,and the Colonel missed an easy putt.\n"Bugger,I missed!" he shouted loudly,at which point the Bishop was forced to tell him that the Almighty would not be pleased with his language and that something dreadful might happen to him.But almost immediately on the next hole theColonel missed his drive and was so incensed he shouted and swore for a good half minute.\nAll of a sudden the skies opened,there was a terrible clap of thunder,and lightening struck the Bishop dead.\nAfter a short pause a voice was heard from above,\n"Bugger,I missed!"
992044
I have been to several different churches.  Some do, and some don't.  The focus never seems to be on an image, statue or drawing.  I think people are worried to much about the wrong things!
1168521
It's a good question, but phrasing it that way will upset a Catholic, because the question is loaded... by asking it that way you are already implying that they doing something wrong (compared to other religions who might interpret adoration as worshiping false-gods).  \n\nStatues have long just part of the Catholic religion, and it's there for visual inspiration.  It' like asking a christian why their symbol is cross.  It's part of the iconography.
474807
what type of errors  u r getting. whatever it is, it is safe to delete errors always. dont worry.
877991
try to find out which one is not correct
950141
Why do you assume they don't? I've read it. Most of the sites out there on the Internet that host it are Christian apologetic sites, or Christian history sites collecting ante-Nicene writings. You wouldn't even know of this text if early Christian scroll-writers hadn't set it down.\n\nThomas is not included in the canon of scripture for reasons we can only speculate at, as the consensus on what should be a gospel formed in the 2nd century and we don't have all the discussions that took place at hand.\n\nHowever, those reasons likely include:\n\n- Thomas contains no narrative. As such, the words of Thomas could not be reliably placed on the scene. How could it be known if the text was unaltered if the writing never gives context to any of the sayings, for instance placing them within the Sermon on the Mount, the Last Supper, or even just some outing across the Sea of Galilee?\n\n- There's no guarantee Thomas possesses any of the antiquity some want to attribute to it. The only complete copy is from the Nag Hammadi find in the 5th century, making it younger than Constantine and the Council of Nicaea. No reference to a "Thomas gospel" predates the second century, which is not the case for the canonicals.\n\n- Thomas is gnostic, a theological position the early church categorically rejected.\n\nThat said, I've read it, and am thoroughly acquainted with it. It has its inspiring moments.
656391
Fix the typos. \n\nFix the grammar.\n\nIdentify the baby in the picture.\n\nAdd more to it.\n\nSpecial effects are available.\n\nExplain exactly what it is you do for your "church" and what the church's mission is.
1024989
Is been revised too many times to please the founding fathers of the catholic church. I think the Gospels ancient writtings that are being discovered recently will shed much information missing from the new testament.
252521
The Church has a tendency to exonerate itself when ever it sees fit on what ever the matter might be.  I don't see where this would be no different.  The idea that the church is NOT flawed and IS the body of Christ is something that it has been trying to hold to the highest degree since its conception.  If it shows flaw.  Misjudgment, mismanagement, what ever the case might be, can it see itself as the body of Christ with all its imperfections?  So to answer the question yes I feel it does exonerate itself.
172430
When citing the Catechism use "CCC" followed by the paragraph number.  For example, CCC 2748.  Sorry I can't give you a citation within context, but my husband must have taken our Cathechism elsewhere because I can't find it right now.
578166
The biggest mistake I ever made was getting out of the will of God, and getting out of church. I got with the wrong people. They took me out in sin, father than i wanted to go. I Thank God for bringing me back to Him, and for another chance to serve Him.
963215
http://www.landoverbaptist.org/news0402/biblefactquiz.html\n\n\nIt would appears to have some other issues as well...
677426
First understand that faith isn't easy.  Every believer at one point or another questions their beliefs.  If you don't like the bureaucracy in the Catholic Church, you may want to try a new denomination.  Try attending a "non-denominational" church. Last I would suggest that you talk with someone in the church about your concerns, they can offer insight and help you with your doubts.  Best of luck and God bless.
1139277
You do find so much rubbish in answer to sensible questions!\n\nThe early Church were under a new covenenant, the blood of Jesus, and so the strict rules of the old one, which everyone failed at anyway, were void.\n\nActs 15:29 You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. You will do well to avoid these things.\n\nPork is back on the menu!