Should Paul McCartney have gone with the prenutial agreement?
484474
I can't believe he DID NOT have a prenup.
625225
Pleased, I expect.\n\nI'm a big fan of Sven, but I do appreciate that his indiscreet  associations with alternate employers left the FA with little choice but to terminate his contract.\n\nI don't mind that Sven sounded out possible employment elsewehere (it seems quite reasonable to me), but most of England feels the opposite - and the FA had to act accordingly.
340775
There wasn't songs that were exactly released during ringo's brief departure in 1968, though The three of them continued on with out him. Paul drummed on various songs, Back to the USSR is the main one that Paul drummed himself.
521577
I had to pick up the copy of People magazine because they were featured on the cover.  Here are a couple paragraphs of what it had to say:\n\n"The truth, say those who know them is that the pair were just not compatible for the long haul. 'I don't think it's laughable to suggest she was bored, but I also don't think it was a generational thing,' says Heather's friend Phillip Goodhand-Tait, who adds that Heather told him as early as January that the relationship was on the rocks.  'You've got two people who've both got tremendous interests that are going to take them in opposite directions.'"\n\n"A friend of McCartney's is even more blunt. "It is quite simple: It was never going to work,' says the pal, noting that the two share strong, outsized personalities.  Although the couple cited media scrutiny as the root of their breakup, 'you can't have two like magnets pushing together,' says the source.  'You don't have two frontmen in  a band, but there were two frontmen in the marriage.'  Adds someone who recently worked with the couple: 'She has a real temper and he can be a bit stubborn, and it is maybe not the best mix.'"\n\nThe article also that other things that people have suggested are that Heather got bored, Heather didn't like being in Paul's shadow, Heather was too controlling, and Paul didn't like Heather always trying to use his fame to further her causes, and of course some say that she only married him for the money...  Personally, I bet it was just that they both had very strong personalities and they both were stubborn and together, it just didn't work.
510339
It was "Come Together" which was an original Beatles song but I do remember that Michael Jackson bought the rights to sing that song and other songs.\n\nThe song came from Michael Jackson's "HIStory" album.
838699
YES!!!! The McDonald brothers should have taken a 500 mile walk.They are an embarrassment to Scotland,and I am scottish.They need to go next.Ashley should have stayed.He just got all the wrong types of songs.
681439
I don't know. But, if I had been in the British government's position, and some guy threatened to starve himself, I would have said, "Go ahead, starve yourself".\nI know, it sounds cold, but think about that for a moment.
974369
You have to wonder. After all, she is using a top ranking divorce lawyer in an attempt to get a huge amount from Sir Paul in the divorce settlement. All that after such a brief marriage, and no children. Few people will see the fairness of this. It looks like Sir Paul is going to be forced pay an arm and a leg to a person that many will regard as a one-legged bandit.\n\nI of course do not share this view. Heather Mills is a wonderful person (just in case she is reading, and wishes to refer this answer to her libel lawyers).
788634
Had he signed that treaty, the only difference in the world would be a lot more Japanese Beatles. :)
925733
Hopefully nothing. Although Paul speaks well of Love he speaks poorly of relationships and people are constantly misquoting him for thier own purposes. If Paul had his way the human race would have died out about 1900 years ago. Being a virgin was the best but it was better to wed than to burn. Eek. I'll follow Jesus rather than Paul.
641672
I doubt it. People who say the Beatles were over hyped...ect. Never lived through Beatlemania. I did. They were a product of the time. There had never been adoration of a music band on that scale before. Every where you went was the Beatles, in magazines, comics, newspapers, radio, TV, Movies. \nKids used to run around the school playground wearing Beatle wigs. Teachers would play the latest Beatles single or Album to the class. You couldn't get away from it (a bit like Jade Goodie I suppose). Girls would recite their Beatles poems to the school assembly (I kid you not). There are bands just as good, if not better nowadays. Don't forget the 'Pop' band was still in it's infancy back then. And as we know, their music STILL has an effect on the music of today.
354200
I would say that Paul's ministry was on of total submission to his Savior , Jesus.  He went where he was sent, no matter the risk.  He knew he was destined to go into the heart of Rome.  He was arrested and had the ability as a roman citizen to immediately tell his captors who he was.  He would have been released from captivity, by the Judge.  Instead he appealed to Caesar even though it could mean his ultimate demise.  Now that is submission.
1146562
There's also clues on an album cover. This theory started with the front cover of Abbey Road. Paul is seen walking across the pedestrian crossing bare foot. This seemed to spark some sort of morbid sign that he was dead. Kinda like a mark of respect. Also if you look closely at the album cover, the white volkswagen beetle in the backround has the licence plate 28 IF. As in, will he reach 28? He was 27 at the time of the photo. That would have been 1969.
988453
paul mccartney & wings - Let 'em in
335314
Hilarious!\nif she didn't take Lennon's name she probably wouldn't take Bono's either, especially since it would be so silly.\nHave a silly day!
690299
If he accepts the deal his claim for unfair dismissal as also for the Restraint clause will be forfeited. take good advice before accepting such offer.
139294
Lennon if I had to pick.  Together they were way better than each on their own.  I do like the answer before mine though!