Why can't the liberals just support the President like Conservatives have always supported liberal Presidents
485445
Now, now... Just because I waited until Billsh*t Clinton left office before I called him a lowlife redneck womanizing sh*t for brains *sshole... that does not mean I supported him.\n\nHell, I've already got a bad back.
744615
i think that you are forgetting that our president at the time, FDR, had some of the most liberal legislation in our nation's history passed while he was in office. Learn you history!
875048
First of all, you're not a loser. More like a hero since you're not afraid to reveal your beliefs in this sea of liberals. \n\nFYI - I'm with you. Reagan, Bush 1, and Bush 2 are three of the greatest presidents in our history. Some of these libs won't accept the fact.   Even when they sit down in 20 years from now and read about these 3 presidents and their achievements while helping their grandchildren with their history homework. All of them seem to have their minds made up and insist on wearing blinders to boot.
869494
Another liberal American hater. Instead of just being haters how about come up with some ideas that would help make this world a better place. The democrats have not worked with this President or this congress at all. During the Clinton administration the Republicans crossed party lines and approved all of his judicial nominees and passed many pieces of legislation because they want to be a part of the solution and not the problem. Liberals are the most despicable people on earth. I rate them right up there with the French.
813205
I am not a rubber stamp for Bush.  I have my own views and it just happens to be in the same thinking mode as him on SOME issues.  My views are completely opposite of the liberals, that does not make me a puppet.  I hold my values, morals, ethics, God, my Country, my Troops, my Veterans, my POWs very dear to me.  Sadly, the liberals don't hold those same views.\n\nAmerica will learn a bad lesson in the next two years.
999864
Look at the responses to your question. Liberals hate bush to the point of stupidity. He can do no good no matter what. Clinton sends troops to Bosnia and they accept that without ANY protest (they are still there even though Clinton promised they would return in one year), our troops are dragged through the streets of Somalia (that's ok because a liberal sent them there). As much as liberals like to think of themselves as open minded and non-judgmental they are neither. If you know a liberal this is a great joke to play. Read the paper in the morning and look for a quote from any liberal (i.e. Hillary, Teddy, Nancy P. etc.) attribute it to Bush and the liberal will spew hatred at the comment and say, "what an idiot", when you correct the source they will get upset and leave. If you do the same to a conservative they will usually say something like, "well that is stupid" and still disagree. Conservatives are better on the ideological which hurts us politically but it's better than being a liberal.
945863
The first thing they would do is blame George W Bush, whether or whether not he was President. If we had a demacrat as a President they might be willing to do something about it, but probably not enough. They would probably want to try to appease the terrorists in some way. As long as there is a Republican in the oval office they will only play the blame game.  Liberals dont have any kind of plan for the future , they just criticize whatever the President or the republicans do.
1085306
Why do liberals always have to "find" some sort of problem in Bush's Administration. For example, it's like when of Bush's administrators professed he was "gay" and all the Dems were on that. What I don't understand is, Dems "are for" gays yet they're criticizing Bush? Why so anti-gay all of a sudden?
530420
Conservatives only hated DEMOCRATIC government. Now that they can vote to cut down trees, build more bombers, give money to their industry buddies, it's all good. Right? Right? Hmmm....
854359
Because America does not want liberal leaders.  The only way they get votes is to pretend to be centrists.
319080
You know I have always wondered why Repuglicans can say being liberal is a bad thing. It really isn't, we think before we act, we explore new ideas, and we care about the human race.
875288
Good question! At the last election Bush went on about 'Massachusetts liberals' (forgetting that he is president of Massachusetts as well as the other 49 states)  even though it pays its own way in the Union, contributing more than it takes out.
814370
They just don't like what President Bush is doing right now with the War on Iraq,   They know that everything is going great with the economy, and that just drives them crazy.  Liberals seem to think more than act.
1008090
BECAUSE THEY ARE LIBERALS.\na Conservative would have NEVER let this site run out of ink\nWHAT F*&^% ink?
735444
Liberals are supposted to support homosexuality, why is it a problem for liberals that some pastor and Foley turned out to be gay.  I'm a republican and I could care less about gay marriage and the like.  Plus, Foley and that Haggard guy don't represent the entire republican party, me, or any other conservatives
570647
A true liberal isn't consistent.  Rosie O'Donnell rode hard on Tom Selleck about his support of the NRA, but turns around to hire an armed body guard.\n\nNow if a true liberal was consistent they would have to
80476
The ACLU supports only what the Liberal wing of the democratic party wishes for it to support.\nI think the ACLU is far from being an organization that promotes the well being of all, but one that promotes the agenda of another. Namely the Democrat's\n\nThose who call the president of the USA A Nazi, must be so ignorant of who Adolf Hitler was and the history behind him.\nIf anything Adolf desired a socialistic society.  More like old Russian Communism.  How would a President that is more middle of the road, but definatly a conservitive be a Nazi?\n\nOh for the one who can't get the quote right..   It is:\n\n"Those who would give up Liberty for security deserve neither Liberty nor Security."  \nThat would definatly  fall with the Communistic Liberals.  I want and this president is trying to give back some of our Liberties that where stolen from us.  The Patriot act and the stuff dealing with it was because of a terroristic act.  Now, I would hope after the terroristic acts of a bad religion cease or is totally distroyed, then they can get rid of that act.\nIt is not this president's fault that we where attacked and we still have a long way to go to rid our country of terrorist.