Is it illegal to put a hula-hoop decal on a pedestrian crossing sign?
493383
Probably because you are defacing public property.  You don't own it therefore you can't modify it.  Just like you shouldn't put stickers on someone else's car or house.  Because it's not yours.  OK to make your own sign and then put a hula hoop on it.  But you are hijacking someone else's work, property and investment.  Think how you would feel if someone painted your car with sparkles while you were gone.  they think it's cool but you are not amused.  same with the people who own the sign (probably the city).  They have to go around cleaning up defacement all the time.  they are not amused.
953816
You should be fine with that.  Most of the signs that are grabbed by the "sign patrol" are those are are either have obscenities, or go against any story they are trying to tell, or promoting someone else; for example, "F*ck It" or "Umaga fears Samoa Joe" or "www.impactwrestling.com"\n\n"Suck It" is a catchphrase, so that poster should be fine, unless of course you are on the hard camera side at a TV taping, then they will all get taken.
976112
Statute mentioned is how to obtain a valid Handicap Tag in Colorado.  Violation of the parking rules is a traffic violation.\n\nUse of a fictitious tag could be arrestable.
34756
If someone enters your property and is injured by a hazardous condition you are probably liable.  Posting a "no trespassing" sign should shift at least some of the blame to the trespasser, especially if local laws permit prosecution.  Only a licensed lawyer in your state could advise you on the full implications of the law.  For example an "attractive nuisance" perhaps a swimming pool without an adequate fence, puts the owner at danger of liability because small children (who would have been excluded by a fence) may enter and drown.  Even posting the property may not be enough.
155601
Wow, I didn't know stuff like that still happened. I've seen if for stadiums but not highways.  I have two answers, contact the ACLU, and start a petition with signatures of all others that are affected by this.  I'm sure they feel like you do, attract as much publicity as you can, public offices don't like to look bad.
750790
this is a pretty general question.\nLandlords may or may not have to do this.\nsome cities force large apt buildings and businesses to put in handicapped signs and some to do not.\nthis also depends on the state or country you are in.\nalso some localities do not force this on landlords with only a few apartments. Just because he is a landlord doesnt mean he must put in a sign.\nBe specific if you need a better answer.
301351
Unless it was your sign I can tell you it would be just as bad as trespassing on the property the sign for intended for. It can be classed as property damage or if you take the sign stealing.
937240
Was the property posted with signs or otherwise made to keep people out? Simple rules of common sense apply. If a reasonably person should have known they were not supposed to be there, then you're guilty.
2136
Simply stated, the White Cane Law specifies that a motorist must stop at least 10 feet from anyone using a white cane or walking stick or walking with the assistance of a guide dog.  Even if the blind person is violating a pedestrian law, each motorist has a responsibility to stop that is absolute.\n\nHere more detail:\n\nWisconsin has the White Cane Traffic Law, 346.26, which has been in force since 1947. This law states:\n\nBlind pedestrian on highway.\n\n1) An operator of a vehicle shall stop the vehicle before approaching closer than 10 feet to a pedestrian who is carrying a cane or walking stick which is white in color or white trimmed with red and which is held in an extended or raised position or who is using a dog guide and shall take such precautions as may be necessary to avoid accident or injury to the pedestrian. The fact that the pedestrian may be violating any of the laws applicable to pedestrians does not relieve the operator of a vehicle from the duties imposed by this subsection.\n\n2) Nothing in this section shall be construed to deprive any totally or partially blind person not carrying the white or the red and white cane or walking stick or not using a dog guide of the rights of other pedestrians crossing highways, nor shall the failure of such totally or partially blind pedestrian to carry such cane or walking stick or to use a dog guide be evidence of any negligence.\n\n3) No person who is not totally or partially blind shall carry or use on any street, highway or other public place any cane or walking stick which is white in color, or white trimmed with red.
1070313
its not against the law if it is on your property and only showing you home, business, etc... We have one in our back yard by our back door and you can sse it on our t.v and we have one by our front door. So no, they aren't illegal if used in the right way :) Hope this helps
666945
I lived in Hawaii for 17 years and billboards are illegal. It was sooooo nice to be able to see the beautiful outdoors uncluttered by all those huge signs.
548242
You didn't say what state you're in, and that makes a huge difference.  Your question is (evidently) a little unclear for some folks, too...so let's see if we can clarify at least that part of it:\n\nIt looks to me like what you're asking is if the police can stop you for a traffic violation committed on private property.  As an example, maybe you're wanting to know if you can be stopped at the local hotel for not stopping at a stop sign erected by the hotel on their property, having a headlight out, or driving five miles an hour faster than what the hotel's signs say you should.\n\nIn California, the answer is generally no.  The California Vehicle Code generally does not apply to private property, though there are some notable exceptions (DUI, reckless driving, etc).  The examples I cited above are not illegal in California.\n\nIf I've got that wrong...and what you want to know is if you can be stopped on private property for a violation you committed on public property...the answer in California, and I'd bet in every state in the union, is yes.\n\nBut really, if you want a reliable answer you need to explain what state you're in, and if you're talking about a specific violation, you need to talk about that too.  There are just too many variables that can apply without any additional information.
233458
I know, in most places of Canada & U.S.A. its illegal to part in any place it tells people NOT to park. You could park only in drastic emergancy situations anywhere if you were in drastic need to do such.
708458
Its probably 2pts.  Im not sure but it is a "moving violation"
800282
No it is not legal, and its trespassing.\n\nSo, you are in for a heafty battle. There are privacy rights, and your land lord can be liable if he is in on it.\n\nGood luck. DO you have hard evidence of this? you will need concrete. LIke pictures... Make sure you have them..
300256
Nope.  It's private property therefore you have to have permission to use it.  Just because it's a parking lot doesn't mean anyone can park in it or park in it long-term.  Generally they have to say they attempted to warn you that you needed to move, a sign does that, but an employee walking out to the car to inform the owner does also (even if the owner is not there the action shows the employee did attempt to inform you that you were no longer entitled to be there).
724656
This is called a cul de sac or court and yes, you can park there, unless there are city ordinances or a clause in your deed or homeowners' association agreement (if you have one) that prohibits it.\n\nIt's just like parking on the street.  You can't block the flow of traffic, though.