Why is paying for sex considered wrong?
481108
well doing hookers exposes you to every thing and everyone that she has seen before,rubbers or not.think a little many are little old lonely men whim have poor self hygeine,little self care and simply want the release once a month before they start drinking.\neasy area for, hiv herpes candida,and syphllis,and now adays tb  the resistant type.\nin the us it is illegal except nevada in some places,otehr countries have horrible times with the hiv going bonkers because of it to.\neven russia is making ammends to curb the hookers there and it was a mainstay of society and money,tourism and many things, but the death it brought hasnt measured up to the \nextra money it brought in either.\n\n  but in all essence if you get in a bad marriage you will pay for it anyways and be lucky to escape with your life, so in many ideas   WHATS THE DIFFERENCE\n  see above explaination
1160321
it isnt against the law but heres why i think its wrong\n\nif u were the baby, and ur mommy who brought u into the world wanted to have u killed, is it YOUR fault? No!\n\n2nd,  it's your mommy's fault, because she got dingy with a guy, and shes like, *puts her hands up* "I didnt know it would happen!!" sorry hun, sex = children (most of the time, anyway)\n\n3rd, its murder.  "You shall not murder," Exodus 20:13\n\nand fourthly, its just not fair to the baby.  \n\naddressing the mother here, "YOU had the sex.  YOU agreed to go home with that cute clerk from the grocery store.  YOU didnt resist AT ALL!!!"\n\nits wrong.  period.
1113005
Yes, I do.  Medical massage therapists are allowed to rub people with their hands to make them feel good.  Sex workers use stimulation to make people feel good.  The only difference seems to be the religious ramifications.  It is a throwback to our stupid Puritanical roots.  I don't think any laws should be based on religious standards, and the law against prostitution is based only on that. \n\nAnd for those who say that venereal disease is the reason it should be illegal, I disagree.  If prostitution were regulated, STD rates in sex workers/patrons would decrease.    \n\nSome people are good at math, some are great artists, and others are good at sensual acts.  I don't see why a woman or man who wants to use his or her body to make money should be denied.  After all, isn't that the same thing professional athletes and models do?
426412
Umm.....if you need to pay someone to marry you, something must be wrong.  So, I don't think so :)
977172
It isn't wrong. The religious nuts want you to think it is wrong but it really isn't. \n\nAs long as it is consensual and as long as protection, then it isn't wrong.
760812
It's disgusting. Men don't deserve to be able to pay money for that kind of attention, they should have to be polite, kind, and caring and build some kind of relationship to get that. It's wrong. And by doing it you're supporting men being pigs. Not to mention that you're disgracing your body and soul.
619416
Some people are willing to receive but not give.Others are just uncomfortable with the whole concept.It is best to ask upfront if this is something you require with sex.Communication rocks!!! Peace.
1076573
No your not wrong because it was better to be safe then ending up having a girl thats pregnant with a child that belongs to you and you having to pay for child support if you don't get married
762984
if she's in a relationship or marriage then no, its not the same as prostitution where sexual favors are exchanged for money....
726800
NO IT IS NOT!  NEVER EVER EVER BUY SOMETHING JUST TO GET LAID!  you will hate yourself in the morning.  A woman that needs a gift to give you some is s whore!  Yep she is getting something in exchange for sex...which makes you...paying for sex! You really need to think about what she wants a little more...if she really loves you, flowers and a teddy bear or simply time together will be good enough to get you laid...if you gotta pay for it go to vegas where it's legal and the workers are tested regularly...I wouldn't risk my privates to a disease just to get laid and have to pay for it too!
576245
to legalize and regulate for example a 'red-light' district which would put the pimps out of work and provide health care for the gals BUT morality steps in and says its wrong to pay for sex, to encourage extramarital sex and to allow this behavior in society.  However, they don't call it the world's oldest profession for nothing.
661760
that is probably true-sex before marriage is wrong there.
801785
Morally...wrong...very very wrong....\n\nLegally...I think it depends on how old you are buddy.
498127
Last time I checked this was a land of freedom.\n\nI'd also like to point out that sex/nudity are completely natural, and it's our idiotic society and culture that makes these things out to be immoral and wrong.\n\nSo to answer your question, no.
538136
I dont necessarily think its wrong as long as its with another adult and you arent doing it with children online.  I would suggest going out on a date rather than online stimulation.
743434
I think you've answered your own question kind of! Though about paying women for bringing life into this world, I'm not so sure.. With population growth as it is in the world, I think it might be better to say that women should pay to bring life into the world, because the world's situation stands to point out that resources are decreasing, thanks to population explosion these days and other factors.. For people like rape victims, who didn't mean to bring life into the world, I'd say they should be the one's who need the benefit.. Hope this helps.. Cheers!
587660
Morally speaking, yes, it's not correct ethically, but it sells. And as for the girls that do it, They like money. o.O You may or may not but there are plenty of girls when approached and handed 1,000 dollars or more, would do anything to be able to keep that. It's not the best way to make money. But I figure since the experience probably will feel somewhat good and they're getting money too, it's a bit of a win-win, even if immoral.