If women ran the world, would missiles and rockets be shaped differently?
490911
Women actually do run the world.
333084
women are fickle.........females are one of the wonders of the world....don'tcha think?....i mean really...is there a single female on this earth you can predict her action?
323726
Yes definately. Woman was created from man. That is why the word "man" is in the name "woman"!! The male species is more intelligent and dominant than woMAN!!!
1072320
No.  The human male is not doomed.  Women would never permit this to happen.  If they did, then women would have to deal with other women all the time.  That prospect would be to horrifying for any woman.  ;)
116906
Yes, women can, as long as they have a brain.
113859
Absolutely, not only it is possible but very likely.Be ready  for the next election process where Sen. Hillary Rodhman Clinton may be facing Condolece Rice. A little more than half the population are women.
82871
I suppose the opposite would also be a bias question.  Would the world be better run by women?  I think that egual representation all around would be ideal.  Keep in mind, there are plenty of great male representatives and plenty of bad ones.  Again, the same can be said for females.  So, the question should be, is it important that free society be governed by fair rulers?
898901
Nah but we should only allow FEMALE Military Leaders!!\n\nThe world would definitely be a more peaceful place.
1118557
Women are smarter\nMan are stronger
434657
taht depends on the women:>
440667
When women take over the would finaly they won't be all the cr** men created
183576
Not me. IMO..most women are too emotional, and I would not have faith in the way they would handle foreign affairs.
1140618
It would depend on what they are doing. Men are better at some things and Woman are better at others.
1113217
What an interesting question.  I think you are right - I expect it would make a huge difference - especially if it included those countries where women currently can't hold office at all.  I imagine there would be far fewer wars as I don't think most women would choose a path of direct action (such as the war in Iraq).  I would like to think there would be more nurturing and care across the board - but that depends on the women.  I mean, look at Margaret Thatcher - she wasn't exactly the warm and fuzzy type.\n\nI think the best thing would be if there could be a more even match of men and women in power, perhaps we would see more balanced leadership - who knows!
610156
she probably would beat some men but not them all.every body has its capabilities no matter how long or how hard you train and once it reaches that limit then thats it
304431
I may not trust Clinton to run this country (in war time or peace time, makes no difference to me really.) Women can run wars though. Margaret Thatcher was brilliant in the Falklands War, leading her country through a tough time to an impressive victory over a formidable enemy. Condoleeza Rice would probabally be a great war time leader. Women can be tough too. Make no mistake about that.
713495
Wouldn't it depend on the size of your rocket?