Do you agree or disagree with the quote,"To each species of creatre has been alotted(bottom there)?
477607
Disagree. "Gallop" is a word to describe motion in horses which could be applied to other quadrupeds.\n\nMoths fly... Bumblebees fly, even though their physics and physicality is all wrong.\n\nHumans think, but even mice have been shown to have rudimentary problem-solving abilities which involve thought.\n\nTherefore, I suggest that your proposition is false.
1031057
All right, I must admit you have made your point very clear!\nLikewise your wording is quite sound.\nPerhaps we must give it a second thought and \nElaborate the other way around as well\nReally do you want to get it right?
798456
NONE OF THEM ARE CORRECT.  THEY ARE ALL WRONG.  IF YOU REPEAT IT 20 TIMES, IT WILL STILL NOT MAKE ANY OF THEM RIGHT.  IS THAT CLEAR?
235272
I don't really pay attention to either side's nonsense.  Rather I find 3-5 other places that confirm or deny it.  If at least 3 don't agree on what was stated or how, it's probably nonsense.  Or I compare both sides on the same issue and then make up my own opinion.
717010
Why not include the rest of the passage, rather than simply trying to create issues?\n\nBesides, John Paull II is dead now, and not exactly in a position to clarify his remarks for you.
525058
Personally, I like how C.S. Lewis stated it (I think it was Lewis - if not someone please correct me):  "We don't have souls, we are souls. We have bodies."
1100158
I think we need to take the focus from 'assholian' people and put it on 'assholian' birds.\n\nI've yet to meet a bird that has been nice to me.\n\n\nThey are because they don't deem you worthy of better treatment.
43519
It hasn't been "proven" wrong, but there are several alternatives.  Check these sources for in depth information.  I got this information from James P. Hogan's "Kicking the Sacred Cow: Questioning the Unquestionable and Thinking the Impermissible", which covers evolution, cosmology, physics, environmentalism, AIDS, and the general attitude that the most prevalent theories must be right.
26790
this statement is niether wrong nor right !.....\n->if this line was true then the guy who loves you should not love you as you love someone else and should love the one who loves him........\n->if this line is false then everyone wold be waiting that when someboby will love him and then he would also love him,but this way no lovers will ever exist on this earth !
600364
mosqutoes are everywhere...\nwatch out!!!
351519
No         \n\n\n\nbut i think its wrong
1055955
im going to disagree with what you agree...agreed???
693591
I suppose you may have a point.\n\nBut what if someone said these things about you, could you take it as constructive criticism, or would you be highly offended?\n\nWe all have a huge mountain to climb.
101116
Its a matter of opinion.
1180511
heaven...or hell\n\none or the other, the choice is essentially ours\n\nthere is no option C\n\nwe will not become extinct, we are not going to destroy the planet, and we are not going to become anything other than human (in the material sense, anyway)\n\nsadly, we mostly take the low road (broad road), and miss the high road (narrow way)\n\nwe are certainly not "improving" as a society of creatures, we're not doing a better job of taking care of the earth, and we're not doing a better job of taking care of our fellow man...by and large, generally speaking\n\nbiologically/genetically speaking, our genome is (still) in decline, mutational load is increasing, the number of pathogens that we have to do battle with is increasing\n\ni am speaking generally, on average, on the whole here\n\nthe only reason we live longer on average today (and that statistic can be viewed and discussed from several perspectives including "QUALITY" of life) is do to science and technologoy...certainly not due to any random, accidental, lucky, purely naturalistic processes\n\nwe're not getting better...as purely naturalistic humans\n\ni'm not a pessimist...or an extreme optimist...i am a realist
888050
writing an essay is my guess\nit really sucks to be u \nand ill just point out that least and most contradict each other\ngood luck on the paper with those grammer skill\nno, i am a nice person\nsomewhere in the shriveled black heart lies some sympathy\nnow back on topic:\n\n1.  ecosystems are balanced, and all species share resources with other species, and are dependent on each other because if one side eats too much, there is less food for the others, adn they die\n\n2.   an ecosystem is everything that life has anything to do with.  So, if say a human pollutes the air, a plant cannot breate, the herbivore cannot eat, adn everybody dies again\n\n3. humans recieved this most wonderful gift of travel, but the rest of the animal world hates us for it now.  what i am saying, since really nothing stops a human from adapting the habitat to fit in.  we are really quite good at fitting in.  so, natural restrictions that normally limit a species from entering, dont even trip us.  We come into hte place and take space away from others, effectively pushing species onto each other, and they compete for the things htey need even if there is not enough, they then adapt and we futher evolution\n\nin the end it is all about resources, and competition (try Darwin)\ni hope my rambling helped
768056
No but that is a fantastic quote.\n\nFound it!  Thomas Dewar