Legal term, Abstract Of Judgement?
478115
abstract of judgment - A copy or summary of a judgment that, when filed with the appropriate public office, creates a lien on the judgment debtor's nonexempt property. • This lien gives the judgment creditor the right to attach the judgment debtor's property. (source: Black's Law Dictionary)\n\nlien - A legal right or interest that a creditor has in another's property, lasting usually until a debt or duty that it secures is satisfied. • Typically, the creditor does not take possession of the property on which the lien has been obtained. (source: Black's Law Dictionary)\n\nWhat this means in English: You've won a case against someone. You can file the abstract, and it creates a lien against that person's property -- it allows their non-exempt property be sold off to pay off the amount of the judgment. That is, with the sale, its pays off what you're owed. Some property will be exempted from possible sale; what that is depends on where you are, and such.
390231
Depends on when the judge makes the decision.Followup with your lawyer.
126060
Judicial Discretion is the technical term for it, meaning that the judge has that option and can choose to follow those recommendations made by cousel. \n\nIn common terms though -- OUCH!
231676
What state?  What ruling?
201356
Yes, it is.\nAn abstract noun is a name for an idea - e.g. idea, performance, communication, democracy, hatred or terror.\n\nA concrete noun is the name of a person, place, object - i.e. something you can see, touch, hear etc. - e.g. eye, eagle, New York, George Bush or wildebeest.
673612
Not a clue on the legal reasoning bit, I'm afraid. Stare decisis means 'stand by your decision' meaning that decisions of previous judges have to be followed if it is in a lower court (there are also some other exceptions.) The UK statutes have to 'match up' to EU legislation and the Human Rights Act. I think that it all links in with not going against the EU bit, but I'm not too sure, I'm afraid. Hope that helps you a bit! :)
898075
I can't find the text of the decision online, but if you have access to LexisNexis or Westlaw, the citation for the case is 595 F. Supp. 1521. You could also go to a law library and look it up in the Federal Reporter. The ruling was made by a Connecticut Federal District Court in 1984.
603077
http://dictionary.law.com/
1088526
Writ of Fieri Facias\n\n"The name of a writ of execution. It is so called because, when writs were in Latin, the words directed to the sheriff were, quod fieri facias de bonis et catallis, etc.; that you cause to be made of the goods and chattels, etc.\n\n"The foundation of this writ is a judgment for debt or damages, and the party who has recovered such a judgment is generally entitled to it, unless he is delayed by the stay of execution which the law allows in certain cases after the rendition of the judgment, or by proceedings in error."\n\nBasically, you have been found to be liable for damages (sued for instance), this writ of execution empowers someone (like a sheriff) to come collect the damages. It also usually prohibits the property from being sold or refinanced.\n\nUsually written as "fi. fa." rather than FIFA, which can lead to confusion when searching for it on the web.
218013
More precisely, it's a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, meaning "notwithstanding the verdict."  A judgment entered by the order of the court for the plaintiff (or defendant) although there has been a jury verdict for the defendant (or plaintiff).\n\nUnder the federal rules, which are often mirrored in the states, the party making such a motion must have previously entered a motion for directed verdict, usually prior to the presentation of their own case, in order to be entitled to make the JNOV motion.
251398
a default judgment is entered.  if you are not there to contest it, and the ruling is against you, you waive all rights to future contesting it and are absolutely stuck with the ruling...a bad idea unless you are guilty as sin and are prepared for the consequences.
3615
Conclusion = A judgment or decision reached after deliberation\nFindings =  A statement or document containing an authoritative decision or conclusion(reasons)
742495
The outcome of what was being decided in court is being withheld.  Could be a closed file (closed to the public for whatever reason) or because the judge wants more time to render a decision.
258886
WesLaw.\nFindLaw.\nJstor.
775093
Judicial review refers to the Judiciary's right to examine any law that someone claims is unconstitutional and, concomitantly, to issue a decree striking it down if it is not.  Judicial restraint is a more general term refering to a court's supposed reluctance to interfere with the legislature unless it has clearly overstepped its constitutional authority.  Hope this helps.
701403
What is the jurisdiction for this scenario?
512959
do you mean to sue someone on a particular issue or do you mean once you sued someone, how long is the judgement good for to collect on it ?