Greg Chappel is better coach than john wright?if no,why?
493634
YES.\n\nHE KNOWS HOW MAKE INDIANS WIN.\n\nBUT, WRIGHT TAUGHT ONLY THE WAY OF WIN.
857119
Yes it is a nice pair. Or else Sehwag and Ganguly.\n\nWe are fortunate to see once again the flowing, exquisite cover drives from Ganguly.\n\nWatch out Greg/Vengserkar/Kiran More.
916936
Yeah, they got Whitiker sitting on the bench.  When they've let him play he's shown a different sort of game ability.  The staff has the best read of the abilities you mention.  They see the kids every day.  Still, Tech has left better players sitting on the bench because Beamer won't adapt to reality season after season, or some warped loyalty or stubborness.  This wouldn't be the first season that the team didn't have the chance it would have had, at the best record possible.  Probably true of most college teams.  No way of knowing what the coaches may know about I. Whitiker's readiness to play ball.  With you, though, I don't have confidence in Beamer's ability to coach  at a higher level.
548355
Shoaib Akhtar is faster than Brett Lee but Lee is a better bowler overall. He is more consistant and takes more wickets. Lee also helps with the bat.
1017778
1 & 2. Bruce Edgar was 102 not out (off 141 balls in 202 minutes, including 7 fours) and was the non-striker for the "underarm incident".\nMcKechnie was the striker, and it was the first and only ball he faced (0 not out of 1 ball in 1 minute).\n3. Greg Chappell made 90 (off 121 balls in 161 minutes with 7 fours). He was out caught Edgar off the bowling of Snedden.\nThe match had earlier controversy than the underarm ball: in the Australian innings, Martin Snedden took a spectacular low outfield catch off the batting of Greg Chappell. It was disallowed by the umpires, although TV replays clearly showed it was a clean catch. Some commentators believed Chappell should have taken Snedden's word that the catch was good. \n\n15 runs were required from the final over. Hadlee hit the first ball for 4, was lbw to the second. Smith took twos off ball 3 and 4, and was bowled by the 5th. McKechnie came to the wicket with 7 required, 6 for a tie, and Greg Chappell instructed his brother Trevor to bowl the final ball underarm, rolling along the ground. Australia won by 5 runs, to lead the best of 5 series 2-1.\nHowever underarm bowling was not only legal, but until the mid 19th century was the norm. So although definately not in the moral tradition of the game, it was perfectly legal, although it should have been a no ball, as Australia had too many fielders outside the fielding circle!
594259
IRONICALLY THATS PRETTY MUCH TRUE.\n\nBUT, FOR UNKNOWN REASONS SOMEONE HIGHLIGHTING PATHAN AS A FAR BETTER BOWLER.
977557
What I find is that the Indians tend to expect results too fast and too many in no time. This makes the job of a coach really difficult. Greg has abundance of ideas and strategies which he wishes to implement gradually. I think he has the world cup in sight and is moving along accordingly. At this point of time, I find that the best bet is to support Greg to the fullest and he should be given a free hand (in the real sense) and should wait for the results of the World Cup.\nI totally agree with you that the review of Greg's performance be made only after the world cup.\nAll the best to dear Greg (Lage Raho Munna Bhai).
149581
No!\nGreg chappel is doing pretty good!!
1002139
He is a great bowler himself. No doubt about his ability as a bowler. But dont know his ability as a coach. Great Players may not be a great coach. There are many instances to prove this. But neverthless he can pass his many skills as a bowler to the next generation players. I think Pakistan can afford to try this. He can turn around things for his country.
856481
You don't want to blame the players for their performances and you want Greg Chappell to continue as the coach. Then, between the two, who should be blamed for India's recent poor performances? Not Sourav Ganguly, I hope.\nExperimentation is OK when you have 22 players who are close to each other in their performing abilities. India can just about manage 6 to 7 at the most, who are certain and consistent performers. So what's the logic behind Chappell's chop and change? Why should consistent performers in a particular slot make way for others, when the replacement's performance is unsure? With World Cup, 2007 round the corner, isn't it time we had a set team in place, raring to go? \nAnd whatever happened to motivation? Both coach and skipper seem to compete with each other to lift the trophy for the most uninspiring leader. And on top of that, contrary to the much touted belief that Chappell has a shrewd cricketing sense, he is in reality a shrewd politician who has optimally utilised BCCI politics and infighting to his advantage. He knows that he can continue as long as he stays on the right side of the powers that be. That and not performance is the topmost concern of the self serving Chappell. \nAnd it has come to light that a lot of players, specially youngsters and new comers are scared stiff of Chappell. They can't speak their mind freely for fear of retribution (being axed at the behest of Chappell). Chappell's flair for vengeance has already been well established. So much for confidence building. \nTeam India (rechristened Team Chappell) continues to demand flat, dead tracks as a precondition for good performances and a victory. On a green and bouncy top, their performance is pitiable. And offered a wicket of their choice at Mohali in the just concluded Champions Trophy, they dished out a pathetic performance and lost to Australia. So what essential difference has Chappell brought about, which did not exist in the era of John Wright? Why should BCCI fork out an extraordinary amount of money to a non performing coach? Just to keep him in good humour? Or for some flashy, headline grabbing sideshows like training with Indian Army personnel? Even our Jawans must be ashamed at their association with a training programme, which brought about such dismal performances from the team.\nYet you contend that Chappel should stay on. A pricey coach must deliver or be shown the door. Yes, Chappell should stay, only till the date when his contract with BCCI ends.\nI'm sorry, being unable to furnish a single point in favour of Chappell, even for the benefit of a self confessed cricket lover as yourself.
560238
i dont =)\ni'm aussie, but i think federer is a way better tennis player than hewitt
124091
Not Sachin surely...and what's the grouse with Ganguly - the most accomplished Indian Captain in its history...politocs aside...it should be based on performance...Tendulkar gives the spirit to the team...
866227
I think so. I was a supporter of Giles in the first test, I'm not sure why, I just was. But now I think we need more attack in our bowling, especially with Harmison throwing them all to the stands. Also Adelaide is apprently good for spin, maybe play them both...
774998
Ricky "punter" ponting is the key mate\n\njust check out his stats\n\nhttp://content-aus.cricinfo.com/australia/content/player/7133.html\n\nwhile i am not particularly fussed either way on the bloke his stats speak fro themselves
128862
no I really feel sorry for him. I dont think he deserves to be insulted like this. I hate that greg chappel. Now dadas under a lot of pressure. He's not the only one who's not in form, what about sehwag , sachin n even dravid at times. i really feel sorry for him
482384
It is too early to guess or post sreesanth better than pattan. Infact pattan has the experience and has played many games than sreesanth.
1030519
before i answer, i must tell u that ur question is worth thinking after. \n\nindian coaches for india haven't been much successful in the past. before they choose a coach for a team, they must not see how many records they hold in the history of cricket, but the coach of the team should be able to teach the team in such a way that the players r forced to perfection and get 100% performance. \n\nas far as expertise is concerned, ther is no lack of experts in india, but still some experts of overseas analyse the statistics better sometimes. may b that's the cause that the foreign coaches r more preferred than our own coaches who actually own their citizenship and r no migrators. \n\nwe have seen how kapil dev plays, but we have also seen that under his coachmanship, india did not win many matches, while now, after greg chappel came in action, india is at her best of forms. \n\nif ur trying to ask for a replacement for gregy, well, i suggest someone like desmond haynes, kris srikkanth, sunny gavaskar,\nvivian richards, etc if ur thinking to improve the batsmen.\n\nif u want an ideal coach for bowlers, well, i thinking india should have a bowling coach like dennis lilee, holding, jeff thomson, wasim akram (well if pakistan would let him be a coach for INDIAN bowlers), etc.