what is the genus and species of the family dog?
483235
Canidae(Family)\nCanis(Genus)\nfamiliaris (Species)
836733
There's a lot of dog's breed. The dog's scientific name is based on the pedigree.\n\n\n**LABRADOR Retriever**\na breed of domestic dog. (We have one named Comet.) \nScientific classification \nDomain: Eukaryota\nKingdom: Animalia\nPhylum: Chordata\nSubphylum: Vertebrata\nClass: Mammalia\nOrder: Carnivora\nFamily: Canidae\nGenus: Canis\nSpecies: C. lupus\nSubspecies: C. l. familiaris\n\nTrinomial name \nCanis lupus familiaris\n \nThe dog is a mammal in the order Carnivora. Dogs were domesticated from wolves as recently as 15,000 years, ago[1] or perhaps as early as 100,000 years ago based upon recent genetic fossil and DNA evidence[2][3]. New evidence suggests that dogs were first domesticated in East Asia, possibly China[4], and the first peoples to enter North America took dogs with them from Asia. Genetic research has identified 14 ancient dog breeds, with the oldest being the Chow Chow, Shar Pei, Akita Inu, Shiba Inu and Basenji. Because many of the 14 breeds are associated with China and Japan, the theory that the dog originated in Asia seems to be likely.[4] Over time, the dog has developed into hundreds of breeds with a great degree of variation. For example, heights at the withers range from just a few inches (such as the Chihuahua) to roughly three feet (such as the Irish Wolfhound), and colors range from white to black, with reds, grays (usually called blue), and browns occurring in a tremendous variation of patterns.\n\nfor your reference on the  breeding\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dog_breeds
1062879
genus and species: Ramphastos Ariel\nfamily:Ramphastidae\norder:Piciformes\nclass:Aves\nphylum:Vertebrata
128531
The red panda (Ailurus fulgens) has been traditionally included within family Procyonidae, along with racoons and coatimundis. However, a 2000 study rejected the hypotheses that the red panda is most closely related to the bears (ursids) or to the raccoons (procyonids). \nSome new classification schemes assign it to its own family, the Ailuridae. \n\nThe giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) is a member of family Ursidae, along with other bears. The evidence for inclusion of this species is overwhelming, despite its obvious specializations. \nSo I guess the answer is No, none of the "panda" species are related to racoons.
521461
Scientific Classification\nKingdom: Animalia\n \nPhylum: Chordata\n \nSubphylum: Vertabrata\n \nClass: Mammalia\n \nOrder: Proboscidea\n \nFamily: Elephantidae\n\n\nSpecies\n\nLoxodonta \nLoxodonta cyclotis \nLoxodonta africana \nElephas \nElephas maximus \nElephas recki † \nStegodon † \nMammuthus †
1049888
I would have to say a cockroach. They sure as hell breed like them. Oh yeah I forgot it is that pathetic excuse of being Catholic. What a joke LMAO!!! Makes sense to be a cockroach, they are hard to get rid of too, don't insult the chihuahua.
217845
Mongoose or Meerkat (which is a member of the mongoose family) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meerkat
502659
The majority of small tooth whales are called dolphins.  They are mammals of the order Cetacea and the families Plantanistidae and Delphinidae and include about 50 species.  All have a beak like snout and sharp, conical teeth.  The term porpoise is sometimes applied to many of the same species, but porpoises, are members of the family Phocaenidae and have a blunt snout and spade or chisel shaped teeth.  The dolphin fish, is neither a dolphin nor a porpoise.  It is a sport fish related to the mackerels.
939486
Gila monster-yes\nchameleon-yes\niguana-yes\nsquid-yes\nladybug-yes\noctopus-yes\ncentipede-yes\narmadillo-no\nbaboon-no\ngoat-no\nreindeer-no\ndonkey-no\nwolf-no\ntree frog-yes\ntarantula-yes\nbutterflies-yes\n\nHint: the armadillo,baboon,goat, reindeer,donkey, and wolf are mammals and they give birth to their young.  Now the only mammals that do lay eggs are the platypus and the two species of echidna.\n\nI hope this helps.
7431
An Alaskan Malamute.\nIt is the cutest dog breed.\nDo visit the link to see its cute picture.
135078
Its part of the CANINE family; dogs, foxes and wolves all belong here.
1099392
Domain.\n\nThe classification system goes Domain (Eukaryote, Bacteria or Archaea), Kingdom (Examples: Animals, Fungi), Phylum (Example: Arthopoda), Class (Example: Insecta), Order (Example: Carnivora), Family (Example: Felidae [cats]), Genus (Example: Homo), species (Example: Homo sapiens), sub-species (Example: Bison bison bison)
49956
one species of animal is defined as a group of organisms that may breed to produce viable offspring. eg. "Mammals" are not a "species" as they are not all able to interbreed (never seen a rabbit-sheep cross, have you?) I would estimate at over 1000 "animals" although there must be many more species of organism, including many species of insects, plants, bacteria, fungi, viruses etc.\n\nLook up the science of "phylogenetics" or phylogeny for more details
517112
lions and tigers are one i know of. aka ligers/tygons. i believe wolves/dogs can be too. i would assume that there could be a lot more possibilities as long as they are in the same family of animal.
767098
Carnivorous mammals (an order) are divided into the families caniformia and the feliformia.  Foxes are of the caniformia family, along with dogs, bears, wolves, weasels, raccoons and others too numerous to mention.
667636
Hippopotamus, Shark,Lion, Elephant, Piranha, Gorrillas, Tigers, Wolves,Jaguar and Leopard
516185
It is not a breed of dogs but a breed of rabbits. \n\nThe saying comes from the fact that an old english gentelman by the name of Charles Familiarity used to exclusively breed rabbits called contempt bunnies. They were huge, carnivorous, lop-eared fuzzy bunnies that ate rodents out of dungeons. The breed died out as the use of dungeons became obsolete, but the saying still exists today.