DOES 'Hasitha' DESERVES 130 BEST ANSWERS?IS HE NOT FOOLING YAHOO! ?
485185
IT SEEMS NOBODY WORRYING ABOUT THAT.\n\nYAHOO MUST COME IN THIS ISSUE.\nREPORTED ABUSE MANY TIMES.BUT NO RESULT.\nHE IS DOING HIS CHEATING CONTINUOUSLY.\n\nA REQUEST TO YAHOO.\nYOU MAY REMOVE THE TERM "Gaming of points" FROM YOUR REPORT ABUSE GUIDELINES.\nIF YAHOO DID,'Hasitha' CAN DO 'CHEATING' LEAGALLY.
298111
That's ludicrous. Schneb is one of the people who are actually utilizing Yahoo Answers to the fullest extent. He thoughtfully and carefully answers every question that pertains to him.\n\nNow he's been suspended? For what? Some "violation" that makes no sense? I hope to see him back soon.
1060329
I have never seen macguyver727's Q&A.\nBut I must admit your Q&A are some of the strangest I have ever read. Maybe he finds your Q&A interesting and entertaining.
783692
He is the same one who post all those other ones too? He sent me some nasty e-mails one day. He is probably some kid getting kicks out of posting all that stuff.
184928
is that even him? when i read his question (if it really is him), i couldn't help but wonder why on earth would he be surfing the net asking questions when his wife just gave birth? why would he ask random people when he could just "buy" all the professionals out there.
948582
At least your account didn't get hacked down-- like mine.\n\nAs much as I would like to slam every lib here, I can't.\n\nIt's only a handful of especially bitter and threatened libs.\n\nNot all of 'em are soulless.\n\n\n\n\nGee, a thumbs down.\n\nIs it one of you "reporters"?
601047
Dear Srinivasa,\nYour pertinent question and urgent curiosity has unfortunately, been buried under more legitimate concerns. If you don't get an answer within 24 hours, it is best to delete your query and ask again.\nSrinivasa, I would like to take this opportunity to express my personal opinion. You have been foolish, Srinivasa. Very, very foolish. Anyone can see that the purpose of Yahoo! Answers is to serve as a modern chatroom. More and more, Java programming is becoming less and less supported, there is no other method of bringing people together in a social environment than to create PHP scripts where the "thinking" can be done on the server rather than on your machine. With that in mind, Srinivasa, you should interrogate the shallow-minded participants of Yahoo! Answers with matters that appeal to their common denominator. Questions such as, "How long is the normal tally whacker?" or, "My boyfriend says I should dump my hubby, what you think?"..., would get you a substantial number of replies.\nGive up your pursuit of truth and petty wonders, Srinivasa. Quit asking bland, colorless questions. Are you naive? No person who is capable of giving you the answer you hoped for can last while reading though a heap of puddings, pies and pastry. I'm only doing you a favor, Srinivasa, by giving you a proper admonishment you can now begin to formulate an apology. When you are ready, send your atonement to http://surveys.yahoo.com/user_ad_feedback \nAnd Srinivasa, if you insist upon asking serious questions, remember that a few good jolts from a peace officer's tazor should bring you around to your senses. Please, check your spelling and throw some slang into the mix so you don't offend any of the egos lurking, waiting to pounce on you with crass, thoughtless one-liners.\n\nThank you Srinivasa, and have a great day!\n-zealnik
251842
I am way ahead of you! I have reported him each time I see a post by him.  It's unfortuneate we can't enjoy ourselves anywhere!\n\nYes, everyone has a right to their opinion, and a right to express themselves how they choose, however, it is clear that this individual in particular has passed the "right of opinion" point!  There are numerous people who are opposing/offended by all his statements, and he is in violation of his user account, and it needs to be terminated.  We don't have to put up with it, we don't have to read it, we don't have to respond, but this person is posting back to back, it's hard to avoid it!
513471
...And the Great and Wise and Not-quite-omniscient God of Yahoo Answers spake thusly:\n\n"And lo, there shalt be a place known as Yahoo Answers, and it shalt be good, where the knowledge I have blessed my children with may be shared for all.\n\n"And I doth bestow upon it these gifts of freedom of speech, so my children may whine and squabble and type whats on their mind in their infinite boredom.\n\n"There shalt be community guidelines, a spelling checker, and a helpful points system to reward good answers; that people may ignore at their will.\n\n"And on the great day of judgement, when all those who have attained levels of Six and Seven, will join me and ascend to a heaven of useless sh1te, where grammar shalt run amok and all traces of spelling have departed long ago..."
1002000
No, no! It's nothing personal! I'm glad to hear your answer - I wish he had left it online. (Bilberries are one of my favourite fruits - do they grow better in the shade? All the more for me if so : )\n\nHe might have already heard or found an answer he liked and hoped to save anyone else trouble. Politer to have acknowledged the answers he'd received ... but he might not hav realised this. I have often seen my Q&A listed with zero answers and clicked on the question to find five answers anyway. \n\nHe might have posted it for a bet with his pal or partner and found that he was wrong, instead of proving his point, and zapped it in annoyance. Or to make a point - "I bet you all that this is the one question that nobody can possibly answer." \n\nOr he might have had it as a school assignment, and now that he has an answer, removed it to stop his classmates from searching yahoo for their own homework, so that he looks good.\n\nOr - who knows? Maybe he hasn't gotten many points and hopes that he will retrieve 5 points by taking the question out? I don't 'play for points', so I don't know if that's how the system works. \n\nIt would have been better if he had left it online, I agree with you. \nHe's learning. Aren't we all?
684367
i think he's real, his best answers increases and he has tons of points\n\nalthough yahoo could do that themselves
921435
Actually the Majority of his posts are Off Topic Spam, I report them as such, others are Personal Communication and Chatting, which I also report. Many others are rhetorical questions, If they aren't meant to be answered it's "not a question or answer" and if they lead to judgmental decisions it falls under Harassment.\n9 out of 10 of his posts are reportable. \nI do so simply because I find his questions only vaguely understandable, unwelcome proselytizing, as well as Judgmental harassment.
408880
It is NOT just you. There is a serious DUH factor in MOST of the questions in here.\n\n\nReticent how can you blame Yahoo's STUPID questions on Bush. That raises the DUH factor of the answers.
992928
I think answerman does ok, he ranks 47 in the world in points and is currantly 3rd in best answers. He is on a mission though and no loony bean is going to change that. We need a different direction because the one that Bush has taken us on is not working.
663655
Yes, I've seen this guy trying to bring people to his web site. Kinda creepy to me. You girls have to be careful!\nI reported him 'cause he is using this site to promote his site. sounds like garbage to me.
538338
Thanks.\nI have an idea:\nLet us all go to Hashita's Q&A page. There are at least 40  questions all asked by 'No Name' and resolved by 'Hashita'! Rate all his best-answers (you know what rating it should be), and get our 40 points! \nGive him a treat(ment) guys! He has earned more than 480 by cheating. We all deserve to have our share of 10%.
1085366
None of my questions have 20 answers.  What are you trying to say???  I'm deeply offended.\n\nActually, I don't really care what you think.  The answers I got helped me.  It's not quantity but quality.