What do you think about V from V for Vendetta?
493299
fantastic!!!  The only good movie of 2006.  If you disagree, and you say M I 3 was good, you are a loser.
11972
The film was abysmal.  Stylistically, there were some very good moments in the beginning, but that doesn't cut it.  This film is a good example of a film that substitutes style and visual aesthetics for substance.  Furthermore, Anthony Hopkins (usually a fine performer), Winona Ryder (here less than mediocre), and Keanu Reeves (who should never be cast in anything) were all miscast and the film suffered as a result.  Finally, the last act of the film is campy, boring, and poorly shot (we shouldn't be distracted during the film's climax by how much the scenerey looks like a soundstage).\n\nRegarding the book, however, it is clear that the film has used it only as a framework for its own machinery and spectacle.  This was not Bram Stoker's Dracula, but F.F. Coppola's re-reading of the book through the lens of a kaleidascope.
285556
http://movies.yahoo.com/\nmy opinion v for vendetta i wanna see it
371299
It was a pretty good movie,\nwith similar twists and surprises as the first.\nI personally think it wasn't as good as the first,\nbut definitely a must see for the fans of the original!
97286
Are you refering to the first?  I personally thought it was a great movie.  Parts of it were kinda boring, but I loved the ending.  I think what I liked the most though was the moral message behind the movie.
558762
Tha is tuff- Thank you for Smoking or V for Vendetta
751734
Bradley P - that is one super answer!\n\nI put comics down for a while and started reading again. Suddenly I was hit with this post/pre/continuity stuff. Since I prefer to read in whatever order suits my mood - I dismissed the research as it would have gotten in the way anyway. Thanks for the summary.\n- - -\nI actually thought the new Superman was ok. Bullet in the eye was cool. Lifting small Island composed of Kryptonite - not bad.. Him getting beat up on the kryptonite island was similar to when the old superman gets beat up in the diner (in front of the old Lois).\n\nI just really disliked the plot. He comes back, DC's love story of the ages is shot to hell because Lois is with another guy (classy...) - plus he has a kid whose life he may never be a part of (very nice). Now you add Luthor as the villian again (I'm tired of this guy already), throw in tired old kryptonite because they couldn't come up with anything else (not a little, a whole continent this time). Sigh...\n\nI say both these supermen should get together and smash the people responsible for putting this film together. After they are done, then they could fight eachother:-)\n\nThe Old Superman wins..
1011350
I rented it by chance and I thought it was great! Very good! I thought it was going to be another Hollywood action film, but it was not. Pretty violent. Some fucked up characters. etc... (don't want to spoil the film)
1030361
I thought it was well done.  It was really good for a third film.  Usually the third film in a series is not as good as the other films and doesn't meet expectations, but X-Men 3 actually was very entertaining and almost as good as the first two in the series.  However, some of the speech was very cheesy, though all the action scenes were amazing.  I did wish that, instead of being 1 hour and 40 minutes, it was longer in order to add in more character development and expression of the powers.  It seemed really compressed in some areas.
1166168
Unfortunately it's not a good movie as what we expected.\nThe cast, the figures are all excellent. But It's not a successful movie. If the movie was really or much more sharp story as the teeth of aliens and the razor of predators, I think I can raise my two thumbs up!\nBut AVP only good in comic for the story...I collect them all from Action figures till comics.\nIf there is another sequel to come for the next AVP2, I am looking forward to watch it.
437686
Yep i just watched it recently. I thought it was good, but not great. It was a bit slow in places, but it was kind of touching too... to see from an outsiders perspective how screwed up their lives are, and how much I appreciate my life. \n\nFrom a technical perspective, I thought the filming was AMAZING. Insanely well done. I don't know off the top of my head who the director was, but they did such a fantastic job.\n\nDefinitely a good arthouse film, worth watching if only for the excellent directorial and filming illustration.
331100
I'm 98% positive that the music you want is the END of Tchaikovsky's 1812 Overture. There are many many places you find this song online; however, if you're picky about getting the EXACT arrangement (as well as a lot of other cool music) used in the movie, I would recommend just buying the V for Vendetta Soundtrack. :)\n\n(Actually, I'm only able to answer this question because on Tuesday I spent a good hour searching for this song--and probably for the same reasons as you. Here is where I got my copy: http://www.mp3-center.org/download_mp3/Tchaikovsky/1812%20Overture/1876446 The file is free and about five minutes long, with the big cannon finale at the end. And although it starts out softly, be warned that it does get a little loud.)
157890
It is an excellent movie, but it is really really sad.  Basically it is all about not being able to reconcile parts of your identity, live in the way you want, or really let anyone in.  It's about love, but it also is about the ways people can hurt those whom they love (or who love him) by their own fear and inaction.  \n\nIt is an amazing movie, the acting is really great.  I wish it would have had some more sex in it, but for it to even be making this much money and be getting this many award nominations is more then I've come to expect from straight america.
1152083
Well....I got a different view point. I feel that it's a movie that deserves multiple viewings.\n\nI will start by saying that this has undeservedly be panned by just about everyone! The fact is it wasn't what anyone was expecting, especially from Guy Ritchie. What everyone was expecting was cockney geezers and good one liners "do ya like dags?" etc, but this is far more mature than his previous works. I would agree that it is confusing but all the facts are there for us we just have to see them and listen harder, this film demands all your attention! Look past the cool and dazzling look of the film, try to listen to the dialogue rather than admire the performances and i think we will all get a more thorough understanding of the whole film.\n\nYes this has its influences from modern classics( fight club, pulp fiction etc ) but it is in the whole original in both direction and pacing with a music score second to none. I feel that if everyone watched this film over and over they would understand it a lot more and maybe appreciate it for the fine piece of modern cinema that it is and i hope also that Ritchie continues in this vain as i far prefer this to his mockney "masterpieces". \n\nThe brief plot outline is.............\n\nJake Green is a hotshot gambler, long on audacity and short on common sense. He's rarely allowed to play in any casino because he is a winner. Jake has taken in so much money over the years, he is the only client of his accountant and older brother Billy. One night, Jake, Billy and their other brother Joe are invited to sit in on a private game, where Jake is expected to lose to Dorothy Macha, a crime boss and local casino owner who can't play for squat, but always wins because people are too scared to beat him. Jake isn't afraid of Macha, and not only beats Dorothy in a quick game of chance, but takes every possible opportunity to insult the man. Jake and his brothers leave the game, and Macha puts out the order for a hit on Jake, who ends up working for and being protected by a pair of brothers, Avi and Zack, who are out to take Macha down.\n\navi and zack create the fictional crimelord mr gold to use in their big con to make macha and lord john destroy eachother without avi and zack having any direct involvement. \n\nthis film is about breaking free from mr gold, its more physcological than physical and thats obvious in the way its made. for once the physical actions in the movie mean so very little, you need to concentrate on whats happening to and IN the characters minds.
201077
of course people who came into v for vendetta hoping to see a nonstop action flick will be somewhat disappointed but it does leave u thinkin about governments and terrorism. They call V a "terrorist" and in some ways he completely is. He explodes building and inflicts fear into others to get his point out but the thing that really makes u think is that one mans "terrorist" is another mans freedom fighter
768738
Saw the new James Bond movie tonight. Other than being a bit long at about 2 1/2 hrs., I thought it was excellent.\n\nFantastic scenery, great (if somewhat exaggerated!) action sequences, good storyline, and Daniel Craig was really, really good.! Not sissyish or too suave. He is a great choice to play Bond.
262918
Well, I've seen them both, and while I think that Brokeback Mountain was a great film and that you should see it when you get the chance, I really liked V for Vendetta more. They're really completely different movies so it's hard to compare them. If I could only see one, I would see V, because it touches on many themes, has some good action, and really gives you something to think about (not that Brokeback doesn't, but the message in V is more broad). While Brokeback is good, V is incredible.