radiation dosage of 64 slice ct scan?
488998
it should not exceed 5 mSev :) ..
1059712
http://www.vistaradiology.com/NewFiles/MRI.html
814379
The cost depends on where you live, if you have insurance, and your financial situation. Cost also depends on how many images you have taken. My sons last CT he had a pelvic, abdominal, and chest scan (whole body). The total cost was $3470.  Our health insurance covered the entire cost.
84952
60 CAUSE UR CUTTING IT IN HALF. ALL THE WORK
1058287
First, this is a topic that is of continual annoyance for people who work with radiation.  Let's tackle this in sections...\n\nFirst let's start with the Roentgen.  The Roentgen (R) is defined as charge per unit mass.  Historically, it was defined as the amount of gamma or x-rays that produced one electrostatic unit of charge in 1 mL of air at STP (1.293E-3 g).  More currently, R=2.58E-4 C/Kg (C=Coulombs).\n\nOk, back to it.  A RAD is defined as 100 erg/g.  This is basically the same thing as R; a unit of charge per unit mass.  This is the "old" system unit.  This was supplanted by the SI unit of the Gray (Gy).  A Gy is defined as 1 J/kg (seeing the trend?).  Both units are a measure of Absorbed Dose (D).  Ok, if you would like to move between them, the conversion is 1 Gy = 100 RAD.  Why?\n\nOk, 1 J/Kg = 10^7 erg/10^3 g = 10^4 erg/g = 100 RAD\n\nNow, onto the Dose Equivalents.  A dose equivalent, H, is the effective dose received from ionizing radiation.  However, not all radiations are created equal.  A 1 RAD exposure to x-rays is far less harmful that a 1 RAD exposure to >10 keV neutrons.  So, a sliding scale was introduced.  For a given exposure to radiation, \n\nH=QF * D\n\nwhere QF is the quality factor and D is the absorbed dose.  Ok, back to your question.  A REM is the Dose Equivalent corresponding to Absorbed Dose in RAD.  Confused?  Ok, take a dose in RAD, multiply by the quality factor, and you get an answer in REM.  For the SI system, take a dose in Gy, multiply by the QF, and your answer is in Sieverts (Sv).  Generalized quality factors are:\n\nX and GammaRays - 1\nElectrons and Positrons - 1\nNeutrons E < 10 keV - 3\nNeutrons E > 10 keV - 10\nProtons  - 1 to 10\nAlphas - 1 to 20\nHeavy Ions - 20\n\nFor reference to the annoyance caused by the dual systems, as a radiological worker, my DOE imposed dose limit is 5 REM.  This dose is very easy to remember and seems intuitive.  However, under the SI system, my dose limit is 50 mSv, which seems small, though they represent the same physical quantity.
962168
target level is below 180 but ideally below 140 (but this will carry a higher risk of hyoglycemia).\nnever make it below 80 or even 100 as hypoglycemia will be a real danger.
765446
don't try to decrease the dose without your doctors advise. Take your doctors advise and don't listen to any one here!!! RN
460628
100-112 but check with your Dr. it depends on your bone structure\nthank you
1033178
64 bits set in code unfortunately
1091947
Depends on the model, but they are not constricting like an MRI.  Maybe 2 feet?
502903
4.0\n1600\n\ngood luck, mate.
1080805
Less than 100mg/dl and more than 60mg/dl
294284
multiply 70x60 to find out
420712
seems a patient is waiting! do him a favor, send him to someone who knows. however, i am no oncologist but i think quantity of radiation should depend on the site of the tumor, its grade and stage (extent of metastasis), clinical status of the patient, etc. the best way to go about it would be consulting a radiotherapist/ oncologist.
673507
This is total free u should downland follow the steps in the link\nRun a dos scan in the computer.\ni will give instruction for the dos scan \nhttp://ts.mcafeehelp.com/faq.asp?frames=1&docid=71397&CategoryId=243&chat=&s=1
800850
68 and -224. You are right. Good job.
479514
It printed this for me 0♦8\n\nHope this Helps.\nGood Luck!!!