What happen to the Bolsheviks in the end?
488764
The Bolshevic( Marxist Russian Social-Democratic Labour Party (RSDLB(b) party was created in the 1903, in 1952 it was renamed into Communist Party of Soviet Union, this title was used up to 1991 year. Now CPRF (Communist Party of Russian Federation) exists in Russia and there are quite a lot of  elder people who believe in communist ideals and wish to return Soviet times. So, they didn't go anywhere, some are still members of the communist party, others changed their political views. For example, the first president of Russia-Boris Eltsin was a member of CPSU himself, but then turned to democracy.
644227
Write a note! you must be joking??\nThe Russian revolution brought about a massive change in the way the country was run politically, the Royals were 'Done way with' (quite rightly)!and the people took over, this caused a lot of dissent between various groups of 'People Leaders' these little problems were  'democratically' resolved by the leaders bumping each other off, they then had a USSR! A United  Soviet Socialist Republic! Not Communist, socialist!\nMany Socialist believe Communism will really arrive when all Socialist countries unite under one banner and all adhere to the same form of Socialism, it's not all over yet by a long chalk!\nThat's your note! \nIf you would like to offer me a commission to write a book on the subject I'm open to offers(business is a bit slack at the moment!
166335
Industrial revolution led to capitalism and bourgeois society.  New class of Working people were getting developed. This contradiction led to many revolutionary activities and in the course idea of socialism and communism were born like a natural event.
331181
I don`t have the symbols on my key board to answer correctly,but in our language it`ll be USSR, th Union of Soviet Socialist Republic, with "Soviet" meaning "council",and a council being rather defunct during the Stalin years.
22083
The Soviets exhausted too much of their resources and drained their country. Socialism is great; in theory.
329818
Nicholas II dragged russia into WWI.russia was unprepared to candle the military and economic costs.Their military had millions in it but they were poorly trained and their supplies began to run low becuase they had so many people.The Allied forces couldn't break through the Dardanelles to get them supplies from the south and the North sea was Frozen becuase its winter.Russia was forced into a corner with loads of pressure on the Czar which forced Czar nicholas to step-down becuuase of war-related shortages and enormous casualties from the feirce german  army.By this time russia had began seperating becuase  of  the growing revolt.The Bolsheviks leader V.I. Lenin took control of the lands through force.They took control of the government and got russia out of the war through the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk.Actually V.I. Lenin created the treaty by giving most of russia's western border along with the people in those lands to Germany which in turn got them out of the war. Some people literally went to bed russian and woke up germans. It stopped the war on the russian front which is all the russian people really wanted.
984971
History of the Soviet Union  \n    Human beings have always demanded leadership; without it, society invariably heads toward self-destruction. But mankind has evolved over time, from a primal form of tribal leadership, to monarchy and dictatorship and finally, is on its tortuous path to the possibility of complete democracy. From the end of the Renaissance, the people have gradually awaken to the knowledge of human rights and a hatred of dictatorship, thus leading to bloody striving for independence. Such was the case of Russia, a nation rocked by many revolutions; a nation which, in stretching its arms toward economic superiority and political freedom, has sacrificed tens of millions of its people. In proud Russia’s turbulent history, it is demonstrated over and over again that, while the people may be repressed and scared into obedient silence for a while, they will rise, in order to defend their basic rights as human beings.\n\n \nBOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION  \n    Russia, near the end of the nineteenth century, was an impoverished state, miles and miles behind the other nations of Europe. At the beginning of the reign in 1894, Tsar Nicholas II, made an attempt at building factories and railways in order to boost Russia’s economy. Despite such vast economic progress and industrialization, the peasantry was far from satisfied. For, just as in any country new to industrialization, the government temporarily forgot its priority, in the rush to catch up to other more technologically advanced countries: its people. Ridiculously low wages, child labor and deplorable working conditions were wide spread, as trade unions were still outlawed. As the bridge between the poor and the rich widened, revolutionary sentiments began to grow.\n    From the masses, two revolutionary groups arose, both stemmed from the followers of Karl Marx, the Mensheviks, those who wanted wider popular support before launching any revolutionary movements, and the Bolsheviks, disciples of a particular interpretation of Marxism, who wanted radical change immediately. On January 22, 1905, 200,000 workers and their families gathered in front of the Czar palace to demand better “better working conditions, more personal freedom, and an elected national assembly.” The czar’s generals ordered their soldiers to fire into the crowd, killing as many as 1000 citizens, whose efforts only achieved little in terms of political change.\n    To complicate matters even further, in 1914, Czar Nicholas II made the fateful decision to launch Russia into The Great War, World War I, dragging with him Russia’s 11 million peasants. Russia’s economy was still growing, not yet mature, no where near able to handle the economic crisis that the war brought. The Germans crushed the Russian’s poorly equipped troops and inexperienced generals, as well as the soldiers’ morale. The czar had pushed his unstable economy and his unwilling people into World War I; he would indeed feel the consequences of his actions.\n \nMARCH REVOLUTION  \n    In March of 1917, a group of women textile workers led a riot against shortages of bread and fuel. The Tsar’s soldiers were ordered, once again, to fire into the crowd, but were convinced by some of the women to join their cause. Enthusiastic shouts of “down with the war!” and “down with the autocracy!” were heard all over. The Russian populace, after three centuries of oppressive rule, suddenly erupted with the “fever of the masses”; their sheer number and determination forced Nicholas to abdicate his throne. He and his family were placed under house arrest and shot a year later by the ultimately victorious Bolsheviks.\n    A provisional government (temporary government) headed by Alexander Kerensky replaced the dead czar regime as the people dared to look forward to a more secure future. But the provincial government decided to continue Russia’s involvement in the war, worsening internal conditioning. Kerensky gradually lost th
910002
Nope. There will always be those types of people who will take advantage of the "weaker" people. When I say weaker, I mean those people who are physically or perhaps even emotionally or mentally not as strong as others. If there was no government, you would have roving bands of folks going around and taking things from others and forcing others off their land. Eventually, these bands would form dictatorships. To counteract these bands, you would have regular folks ban together into Militias or something like that. And these Militias would either work democratically or have some sort of leader. Ultimately, you would have to set down rules to get together. Ultimately, these rules would have to be enforced when folks broke them. The bigger the group, the more rules that get broken and the more time you need to spend enforcing the rules. Suddenly, it makes sense to have a smaller group do all the enforcing and that group becomes the intervention of an outside authority. One of the ideas of the Bolsheviks was to have a dictatorship of the proletariat for about 5 years after the revolution and then all the people would govern themselves in a model communist utopia. That 5 years became 70 and eventually the USSR broke up and communism stopped there without this utopia where the people governed themselves knowing exactly what is good for them.\n\nThe trouble is that, even in this day and age where everyone is supposedly reasonable, people really aren't that reasonable. People are selfish. They want more than their fair share. Then some people come up with crazy ideas that they want to impose on everyone else. There is a major irrational side to every human being. It causes people to rape and murder and take drugs and do all kinds of things they shouldn't. It also causes love and compassion. This side will always be in humans and will always cause some people to do some stupid and some good things. Because of this, unless you have a really small group, you will always need the intervention of an outside authority.
610946
Good question, The war had just ended successfully, and that led to the Roaring Twenties. Not sure what you would call it.
286988
there were a lot of contributions to the defeat of germany in WWI. a lot was more internal, like the German Revolution. the website talks about this and other events.
178773
That sounds like a recipe for class warfare (which is basically marxism in disguise). Besides their leaders (and many of them) are helpless pessimistic little whiners.
362657
This is beyond the scope of a simple answer, but there were two revolutions, the first in February of 1917 in which tsar Nicholas was overthrown and a Provisional government set up under Kerensky, and a second revolution in October, (or November, depending on which calendar you use) when the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional goverment and established the Soviet state.  Following this was the civil war in which the forces of the Red and White armies fought for control.  The Bolsheviks were holding Nicolas and his family and entourage in a house requisitioned from an engineer, Nicholas Ipatev, in Ekaterinburg, and in July, 1918 when White forces threatened to take the town, the Imperial family was ushered to the basement and shot, their bodies carried in a truck into a forest and dumped first into a mine shaft and then reburied in a shallow grave.\n\nThere are quite a number of books on this subject, and the matter is far too complex and detailed to permit any satisfactory discussion here.
511600
You will have to research Marxist history, Do not focus ont the revolts of 1848 in Europe, Focus on The Paris Commune of 1872, The Revolt of 1905 in Russia, and The Bolshevik revolt. I believe it originated in the Paris Commune. The other two revolts will tie in Vladimir Illich Ulaynov.(Lenin)
427141
No not anymore after commy rule it ended.
931843
what ever happened to we the people
88470
The liberals would become extinkt eventually..\nAbortion\nHomosexuality\nPolitical Correctness\nWelfare and Entitlements\nAssisted suicide
666937
Doubtful.  Marxists seldom help their people.