Do you think there will be a us _ Iran war and if yes who will win?
491700
Iran for sure because after Afghanistan and Iraq wars USA is quite tired and short of supplies and even a Friend countries
1180686
IRAN is gonna beat s***out of mexico........Go iran
367237
It will be a deep impact for USA. The united states will go to boggy!\nNo I don't mean that Iran is a powerful state. USA is very powerful and USa can beat Iran however, a war eating of the source of  a country. And many people in the world will hate USA. It is not good for American people:(
571250
Well now.  A US battle battle group, which consist of aircraft carriers, destroyers, nuclear attack submarines, is capable singly of defeating any power on earth.  And the US has twelve battle groups. So at the very least Iran would be wiped out twelvefold.\n\nRemember how Saddam Hussein's "Mother of all Battles" turned out to be a total non-event.  Iran would simply cease to exist in a matter of days.\n\nAll your conceited, self-serving phony so-called religious rhetoric is useless drivvel.
690189
Honestly I think China would win. The way things have been going on with our Country, I'm not sure what's going on with us. And since Bush is killing all of our troops over in Iraq, who will fight; women and children???????????
40027
The answer in one word:\nNO!!!!\n\nThe answer in many words:\nHELL NO!!! Because the number of troops for the military are streched so thin, its unblievable!! The US will not attack North Korea, because they have been spending too much time on Iran. And they can't do anything about Iran, because Iran has the backing of Russia, China, and India on the political front and the Hamas who is now in control of Palestine along  with the hezbolla militants will start hundreds of terror attacks. Now in Iraq, the Shi'ie muslim party is in power and they will soon become a major allie of Iran and so the US will be even more busy in Iraq. Iran will not be like Iraq that was invaded in a week, it won't be invaded, and hence we will have another Vietnam on our hands. And lastly , If the US even makes a threat to attack Iran, the oil supply from the second largest distributor of oil in the world will be cut off and hence the already high oil prices will triple, causing mayham!!! Does that answer your question? If it does, vote mine as the best answer so I can get 10 points.
536620
Yes if they keep on going the way they are. Iran will get the Bomb, With USA painted on the side of it.
333706
A war between Iran and US would be a tragedy for both nations. It is not important who wins, it's important how many victims there will be on both sides. At the present technological stage, it should be easy to understand that war must never be an option.
1144711
No,they won't.If America is smart enough I don't think they'll mess with Iran.'Cos Iran it's not Iraq or Afghanistan.And US doesn't have the financial and human resources to start another war.It would be lost from the start.
377167
i think America wont try another bloody war like in Iraq, the Iranian ppl voted for thier president unlike Saddam so if there is any war coming it would be WW3.
248016
Let's see, what do we have to choose from?:\nIndia-Pakistan\nTibet-China\nTaiwan-China\nIsrael-Iran\nUS-Iran\nUS-Moscow \nN.Koren-S.Korea\nUS - ex-Soviet Central Asia\nDo the conflicts in the sub-Saharan region count? (just kidding)\n\n\nMy vote is for Israel vs. Iran to degenerate into a major conflict.  A US strike is improbable; the US is in no position to order an invasion of Iran, given the continuing disorder in Iraq, it could launch airstrikes against suspect nuclear facilities in Iran, but most likely it will come from the Israelis. If Iran and other Arab countries rataliate, the US may be in for a major conflict.\n\nThe next crisis in line concerns N.Korea.  Their stated intentions of acquiring an operational nuclear arsenal has sparked calls for a military solution here also (by the right-wing hawks of course). The Pentagon has already begun moving additional forces into the region, including, most ominously, a squadron of nuclear-capable B-52 bombers.\n\nThe third, is the impending crisis involving China and Taiwan.
290601
If there is a war between USA and Iran it will be because Iran is threatening Western Europe and Israel. If that happens, then Iran will be bombed to destroy its infrastructure the way Vietnam was bombed.  Any war with Iran will be a defensive war in response to what Iran has done just as the war in Iraq was due to Iraq's attack on Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Israel and other middle eastern countries.  The USA contrary to public opinion is not a war monger and does not get involved in war unless it is attacked itself, or its allies are attacked.  The US was asked by many oil producing countries to get involved in Iraq, but sadly was not allowed to admit that this is what happened.
420045
I don't think Iran will back down and we will probably strike Iran with possible the help of Israel. I think that probably won't happen for several months until all else fells. This could be the start of the tribulation.
341405
I think I'm gonna go in the yes column for this one. I don't really see China getting involved, not openly anyway. I think a conflict with NK is approaching quicker than anyone is imagining. When, not if, when we strike Iran the die will be cast. At that point we are left in a giant nightmare of our own design. The mideast in turmoil with our assets being sucked dry and Kim Jong-Il looking at his pie chart of the axis of evil. Iraq down, Iran down, time to hit the button. I'm thinkin' he's not a man to bluff. He has openly stated he will use his nukes pre-emptively against the US.
551438
He will probably go after Iran next. I hope not but he is starting a war of words as we speak.
82143
It depends who does what.  If Iran announces it's got nukes, or blocks the Strait of Hormouz, then them.  If North Korea suddenly gets in into their heads to invade the South (or else decides to lob a couple at Japan -Koreans on both sides of the DMZ, along with most of Asia, have bitter memories of Japanese occupation.  Syria, perhaps, though not as likely, given the problems Bashir Assad already has.  However, Iran is the most likely of the three to go nuts -especially with those madmen Khameini & Ahmadinejad at the helm.  And Iran's the primary backer of the insurgency in Iraq -an invasion would force them to cut off ops in Iraq.  It's a strategic question more than anything else.  Iran makes the most sense, since they have a lot of influence in Central Asia & the Caspian -two areas we're trying to gain influence in, along with Russia & China.  It also makes life harder on the Saudis & Syrians, and means it's one less threat we have to face in the Middle East.  Or, it could be something totally out of the blue, caused by someone attacking an ally of the U.S. (though one could argue that's what Iran's doing in Iraq now).
69348
I doubt the United States would declare a state of war with Iran- Iran has not attacked us (at least directly). If we fought a military action, I think it would be brief and simple, involving mostly naval and air forces to bomb and destroy Iranian nuclear reactors.\n\nI think the war would also be coalition-based, with UN and EU forces participating. After destroying the reactors, we would probably end the fighting.\n\nThis is similar to the 1981 bombings of that Iraqi nuclear plant by the IDF-AF (Israeli Defense Forces/Air Force). Except this time, we'll be fighting with a coalition.\n\nI am not sure if Israel should participate in this war. Like the 1991 Gulf War, it could ignite anti-Israel and anti-Semitic feelings in the middle East and spark a huge war.