Why do Leander Paes and Radek Stepanek make a good team in Tennis Doubles?
491933
I THINK THAT BOTH ARE GOOD DOUBLE PLAYERS.PAES IS A GOOD VOLLEY PLAYER AND STAPNEK HAS GOOD GROUND SHOTS AND SERVE.WHEN BOTH COMBINE THESE MAKE THEM REALLY COMPETITIVE.
1121292
omg...this is exactly the same question i asked... Can't you come up with your own questions? JK. I was actually going to pick your answer as BEST ANSWER but i have to wait at leat 24 hrs. But here is the deal, if you pick my answer as best answer, ill pick your answer as BEST ASNSWER too. Deal?\n\nBut anyways. I think he is a great player. He demolished France's Monfils in straight sets, and i think he had a good chance of defeating Nadal in the quarter final. He is also extremely good looking. I bet if i was playing against him i would loose 6-0, 6-0, 6-0, not because because i suck but because i would be staring at him, not the tennis ball, all the time.
129995
They understand the professional demands that each has to face, and they are both very talented in the same sport. Man, their kids are going to be monster tennis players!
970906
i couldn't really say yes basing solely on federer's winning titles and the fact that he has acquired more than sampras at the same age.\n\n\nthe deal is, in the pete sampras era, another tennis great was co-dominating the circuit --- andre agassi. federer had no real competition (the competition that agassi gives to sampras is incomparable to that of nadal-roddick.) which is the reason why he has won more tennis matches
622903
Sampras was an absolutely brilliant tennis player .\nBut in my opinion Roger Federer , The Swiss tennis star ..\nhe is improving in each and every match ..\nthe way he playing every match shows he is having tgreat talent\nHe is SUPERB ..\n TALENT + HARD WORKING  that is federer
301088
Chalk another one up for Nadal. There are some other decent players left in the tournament, but noone who's likely to threaten Nadal.
21760
They didn't play each other.  They played doubles as partners.
328401
The Spurs are fantastic. They're one of the best teams in any sport mainly because of their core Tim Duncan, but also because of their amazing management who managed to draft gems like tony parker and manu ginobili late in the 1st or 2nd round. Their willingness to share the ball and help out on defense is the reason they are a well balanced offensive and defensive unit. Coach pop has also been great for them because he's just a great coach and he's as strict with Duncan as he is with any other player on his roster so he shows that just because Duncan's a superstar doesn't mean he gets special treatment.
549057
Andy Murray has the ability to become a better player.\n\nMurray is Scottish so why should he support a The "Auld Enemy" and risk upsetting many of his fans?
383331
Ginepri is playing well and Sampras has not played a match in a long time. However don't ever underestimate the abilities of Sampras. I mean he has won 14 grand slams. Come on. It could be a good match if Sampras is in shape, otherwise Ginepri is able to win.
867985
Most likely not.  They are usually playing with some injury as it is  during the course of a tournament.  They would not want to pile on the extra doubles tournament because they are going to want to recover for their singles play,  It would be a good idea I think foe them to play, nut I do not see it happening.
566397
Basically because he is such a complete player. He can hit all types of shots. He has no real weaknesses. He is good on all surfaces. Even though clay is not his favourite, he is still more than respectable on the surface. He can vary his tactics to counter all types of players. He has great stamina and athleticism to complement his inate talent too.\nSome players have proven tricky for him though. Nadal has won 4 of the five times they've played, and Nalbandian still has a winning edge on him. That said, his defeats are still few and far between.
1072173
tough to call.. agassi has the experience.. nadal is 16 years younger.. \n\nthey said agassi was limpin' around after his last match.. i'm gonna have to go with nadal simply because of the youth factor
303408
If an all-star South American team played an all-star Europe the South Americans would win for sure. They have technique and they play the game the way it was meant to be. Europeans usually just kick the ball up to a speedy forward and hope that he can score. It isn't as much fun to watch them play.
54048
wilson raquets and wilson balls go good together
1070964
they are da best right now in tennis alongwithy sharapova and clijsters so they more than stand a chance
523501
MEN (Singles): Andre Agassi (USA) def. Yevgeny Kafelnikov (RUS), 3-6, 6-3, 6-2, 6-4\n\nMEN (Doubles): Rik Leach (USA)/Ellis Ferreira (RSA) def. Andrew Kratzmann (AUS)/Wayne Black (ZIM), 6-4, 3-6, 6-3, 3-6, 18-16\n\nWOMEN (Singles): Lindsay Davenport (USA) def. Martina Hingis (SUI), 6-1, 7-5\n\nWOMEN (Doubles): Lisa Raymond (USA)/Rennae Stubbs (AUS) def. Martina Hingis (SUI)/Mary Pierce (FRA), 6-4, 5-7, 6-4\n\nMIXED: Rennae Stubbs (AUS)/Jared Palmer (USA) def. Arantxa Sanchez Vicario (ESP)/Todd Woodbridge (AUS), 7-5, 7-6(3)