Carezani proof of What is gravity force?A Unified force explanation?
486526
Carezani is someone who I have heard of.  He claimed to have found an error in Relativity but so far no one other than him and his supporters seems to know what that is and he came up with a theory called autodynamics which he said was more complete.\n\nExperiments have since confirmed Relativity and shown autodynamics to be wrong but that doesn't seem to have stopped his supporters (I'm not sure what he is up to now).
64226
Whoa!  These are very different questions, but here is Joule's law is a physical law expressing the relationship between the heat generated by, and the current flowing in, a conductor. It is named for James Prescott Joule who studied the phenomenon in the 1840s.  As for The Theory of Everything, it is a hypothetical theory which would unify all known phenomenon and make them explainable. The Grand Unified Theory.  In the universe, there are 4 fundamental forces. The Weak, the Strong, the Electro-Magnetic and the Gravitational.  However, gravity does not 'fit in' with the other forces (in that it does not appear to exist at very small scales).  If this is the case, then why?  We believe that there is a theory so complete that it can do everything from explain the aparent randomness of quantum phenomenon (for example an apparent lack of causality) all the way up to the orderings of filaments and other grand structures.  String Theory is one of many 'Theories of Everything' which is being explored.  There are many different flavors of string theory, but most of them agree on the fact the our universe has more than 4 dimensions and some suggest as many as 10 or more.  Further, the theory suggests that all matter and energy is composed of tiny 'strings', which vibrate.  The type of vibration determines what type of fundamental particle the string is.  In theory there would be a 'vibration' representing a gravity particle (the graviton), but as of yet no particles resembling gravitons have been seen to exist.  On a less scientific note, many Theories of Everything have the fall back that they do not allow for testable, quantifiable and observable results - the core of modern science - and thus fall within the realm of philosophy in that they attempt to explain the way things are, yet leave specific details lacking.
602422
They are not equal. They variates both over the inverted squared distance, but the gravitational force is F=(m1*m2)/μ*r^2 (F is force, m is pole strength, μ is the permeability of the intervening medium, r is the separation) and the gravitational force is F= -G*(m1*m2)/r^2 (G is the gravitational constant, m1 is the mass of the first object, m2 is the mass of the second object, r is the distance between objects). Indeed, those two forces have similarities in the formula, but they are distinct.
154823
Strickly speaking there are four fundamental forces: electromagnetic, gravity, the strong nuclear, and the weak nuclear force.\n\nOn the other hand, it has been shown that the electromagnetic and weak forces are two aspects of the same thing - sort of like how ice and water are two aspects of the same thing. And it has been shown that this electroweak force is the same as the strong nuclear force.\n\nIn other words, those three forces are really one force that we observe as different aspects.\n\nGravity has yet to be connected. String theories are one way being pursued to try and link all four forces together. I ten to think, and most physics people do, that gravity is related. \n\nBut if it isn't then we have : electroweak-strong and gravity as the two forces.
285876
OK, Law of universal gravitation can be given as:\n\nF = G(m*n/r^2)\n\nWhere F = gravitational force, G = Gravitational Constant, m = Mass 1, n = Mass 2, r = distance of seperation between centers of gravity.\n\nSo, in your example, m=20kg, n = 120kg, and r = 0.5m. Plug them in and get\nF= G(2400 kg^2)/0.25 m^2\n\nSolving for F, you get F= 9600 (kg/m)^2 * G\nSince G = 6.67300 × 10^-11 m3/kg*s^2\nYou get\n6.40608 x 10^(-7) Kilogram-meters per second squared.
823207
gravity is a special case  of gravitation.It is the force by which earth pulls a one kg object towards it.\n\nie g=GM/R^2\n M=mass of earth\nR=Radius of earth\n\nnow force acting on a object  of mass 1 kg at a height h(from earths surface) will be \nf=GM/(R+h)^2\nwe can take out R out of bracket so that (R+h)^2 can be R^2{1+h/R}^2\nNow\nGM/R^2=g\nSo we can easily WRITE it as \nf= g/{1+h/R}^2\n\nThis f is that something we usually write as g'\n\nNow g' can be written as g{1+h/R}^(-2)\n\nFOR NOT TOO SOPHISTICATED CALCULATION\nIT CAN BE REDUCED USING BINOMIAL THEORM TO \ng'=g{1-2h/R}
834129
You are confusing energy and gravitational force. The two are\nnot equivalent. The property of gravity is based upon the mass of an object, the more mass an object has, the more gravity it posesses. The amount of gravity an object has does not increase or decrease with time.
560218
instead of counting the number of flux to determine the strength of the force, i suggest u hang a piece of metal on a string, then investigate the angle of the string when u put a magnet at different distance. Because with this experiment, u can calculate the force much more easily through the angel and length of the string with the knowledge of gravitational force.\n\nThe flux suggestion is good, but how do u determine the force? There r much more complicated theory behind it and they r less intuitive than gravitational force.
679319
Wow, Your question is so simple, but it's answer is researched for many decades now. \n\nAnyway, Any kind of energy (and the force is the mean in which the energy can be detected) requires the carrier, which is, well, material. Material carrier contains some kind of energy, in a certain amount. When the carrier collides with a body, it gives it's energy away to the body. In case of two carriers collision, a certain reaction occurs, and as the result, there is anoter type of energy or the carriers get destroyed, and their energy goes into heat or light. \n\nThe way of calculating an amount of energy that certain carrier contains, is the aplication of Einstein's formula of equality of the mass and the energy. If You are aware of the energy inside some particle, You can foresee it's influence to another particle.\n\nThe only force that is not connected to the appropriate particle is gravity (although there are some speculations about existence of so called "gravitones", as carriers of gravital energy and representers of the gravity force itself). \n\nThat unique force, which is not understood yet, makes Your question very heavy. Scientists from all over the world have been trying for more then 70 years to make the unified force theory, which could be used for calculations of any kind of force, with equaly accurate result. This would be named "The great unified theory of forces". So, let'hope that this theory will be defined soon, and that You will understand the duality force-matter better, by using it.
1168282
I read a book about this.  I don't remember the title, but this guy claimed he had it.  He claimed that all atoms are expanding at the same rate.  This is what causes gravity.  More massive objects expand in more space in less time than less massive objects.  \n\nI don't remember the details of the rest of the fields, but they all related to this expansion of atoms.
484687
A.) In his General Theory of Relativity, Einstein developed a mathematical description of gravity—one that links space to time and mass to energy in a fundamentally geometrical fashion. In other words, mass(-energy) shapes space(-time) instead of acting like a “force” in the traditional Newtonian sense.  (Thus, in Newton’s description of gravity, one would say that all bodies exert an attractive gravitational force on one another. In Einstein’s conception, one would say that all bodies change the underlying geometry of space-time in a way that causes them to be attracted to one another.)  Thus, our best understanding of gravity is that it’s a fundamental property of space-time to be “warped” by the presence of mass(-energy). So gravity is simply a property of space-time, and most likely, it came into existence at the same time.  (One caveat: curvature or warping really only provides an analogy to what the equations tell us. If you want to imagine the effects of an object on its surrounding space-time, then you can think of it as changing the shape of space-time in its vicinity. The distortion is real—we can measure its effects—but the images that are often presented of flexible sheets of space-time with bowling balls or marbles rolling around on them, for example, simply present analogous situations.)\n\nB.)  Spinning is a common attribute of objects in the Universe because the way things form virtually always leaves them in rotation, and once things get started rotating, it’s hard to make them stop.  It’s not intuitively obvious, but if you take, say, a cloud of gas and dust collapsing to form a planetary system, then averaging all the random motions of the particles will leave you with some tiny element of rotation.  As the collapse takes place, any rotation will be magnified, so you end up with planets revolving around their parent stars, and planets themselves rotating on their axes.\n\nC.)  It’s doubtful that we’ll ever acquire much in the way of interstellar real estate, simply because the distances involved are so great.  Our best hope is to carry on radio communication with them, but even at the speed of light, it would take decades or centuries for radio signals to travel between us and the stars currently within our range of communication.\n\n\nRyan Wyatt\nRose Center for Earth & Space\nNew York, New York
1044543
General Theory of Relativity:\n\nA mass in space creates an indention much like a bowling ball on a trampoline.  Its this indention that is the cause of gravity.  If a marble were to roll across the trampoline into that indention, it would take a curve path and eventually fall into the bowling ball.  This is what happens when you fall to the Earth: your body is in a sense sliding on the curvature of space-time.
315074
What the hell are you even talking about?  There are no other forces.  Any force in the universe is merely a composition of the four fundamental forces.
911261
well, we know that F = ma, and with gravity, F = mg\n\nWhat causes this force? gravitational attraction, which is defined by:\n\nF = Gm1m2/r^2\n\nSo, we can say that mg=Gm1m2/r^2, where r is the distance between 2 objects (1 and 2).\n\nnow, lets solve it for g\n\ng=Gm/r^2\n\nthis shows us that g varies inversely with the SQUARE of the distance.  So the distance between the earth and an object would need to be r*(sqrt2)
756183
Undisputed laws of physics as we experience it in our universe.\n\nThe mutual attraction between all masses and particles of matter in the universe. In a sense this is one of the best-known physical phenomena. During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries gravitational astronomy, based on Newton's laws, attracted many of the leading mathematicians and was brought to such a pitch that it seemed that only extra numerical refinements would be needed in order to account in detail for the motions of all celestial bodies. In the twentieth century, however, A. Einstein shattered this complacency, and the subject is currently in a healthy state of flux.\n\nNewton's law of gravitation\n\nNewton's law of universal gravitation states that every two particles of matter in the universe attract each other with a force that acts in the line joining them, the intensity of which varies as the product of their masses and inversely as the square of the distance between them.
60378
I assume you meant 'Unified Field Theory'.\n\nIn physics, unified field theory is an attempt to unify all the fundamental forces and the interactions between elementary particles into a single theoretical framework. The term was coined by Einstein who attempted to reconcile the general theory of relativity with electromagnetism in a single field theory. His quest proved elusive and a unified field theory, sometimes grandiosely referred to as the Theory of Everything (TOE, for short), has remained the holy grail for physicists, the long-sought theory which would explain the nature and behavior of all matter.\n\nIn physics, the forces between objects can be described as mediated by fields. Current theory says that at subatomic distances, these fields are replaced by quantum fields interacting according to the laws of quantum mechanics. Alternatively, using the particle-wave duality of quantum mechanics, fields can be described in terms of exchange particles that transfer momentum and energy between objects. Crudely speaking, objects interact as they emit and absorb exchanged particles, in effect playing a subatomic game of "catch". The essential belief of a unified field theory is that the four fundamental forces (see below) as well as all matter are simply different manifestations of a single fundamental field.\n\nA unified field theory aims to reconcile the four fundamental forces (or fields) of nature, namely:\n\nStrong force: Force responsible for holding quarks together to form neutrons and protons, and holding neutrons and protons together to form nuclei. The exchange particles that mediate this force are gluons. \nElectromagnetic force: It is the familiar force that acts on electrically charged particle. The photon is the exchange particle for this force. \nWeak force: Responsible for radioactivity, it is a repulsive short-range interaction that acts on electrons, neutrinos and quarks. It is governed by the W boson. \nGravitational force: A long-range attractive force that acts on all particles. The exchange particles have been postulated and named gravitons. \n\nMore info~ on the link...\n\n<BEST ANSWER>
903133
From what I learned in physics class, the force you are speaking of is measured in Newtons.