how social conflicts relate to terrorism?
481240
Social conflicts as in internal or external? Perhaps you can elaborate on your question -but I take it you mean internal.\n\nIn other countries most people don't have regular jobs and their lives are lived from on day to another. they have lost all hope and have mostly given up on their government promising change and reforms. This especially applies to young people. When millions of young men have nothing to do and are pissed off -you get them rallied up for some bullshit cause and blame everyone else including the West, you got yourself a whole bunch of terrorists -and the is the shortest answer possible.
846316
Are you asking because of the EU situation?  I believe it runs deeper than that, as far as policies are concerned, not just terrorism
83064
Unfortunately, the above answer is incorrect. It is the social context of the group and the socioeconomics of each group. Not the violence or the crime.
207637
First Terrorism has nothing to do with Islam or any religion No Popular Religion Teachs harming another living being..........\nOn a differnet note India is the only country in the world where the Govt cares about the sentiments of the minority and is busy pleasing the minority community insterd of standing with the majority population.
547954
Depends what your argument is. and what exactly the debate is about. Good to know your oppositions points ahead of time though. Does one side want to say terrorism is good.\n\nSome say that a terrorist is just a freedom fighter, the difference is that terrorist kill innocent civillians in order to scare or terrorize the general population. Freedom fighters fight guirilla warz against the military and police.\n\nTerrorists (usually) have no unified flag and are just disgruntled individuals working on their own. It is said that there are larger groups that are working together. Your Al Qaida, kkk, skin heads, \n\nWhy do terrorists terrorize, even if not valid reasons what is their excuse. Are they oppressed, what?\n\nWhat is the govt. doing about it, at home and abroad?\n\nIs it as big a threat as some people make it seem?
198413
Terrorism and revolution are quite different.\nTerrorists target civilizations and use "terror" to bring about their change.  Revolutionaries target the government they feel is oppressing them.\nHowever, as they say: One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
434182
that is a very difficult question.  It really depends because both are organized in a sense and both do things that are illegal; however terrorism is more of a fear tactic used to change the veiws of government officials or affect the decisions that they are making.  Terrorism main point is to make a statement, while organized crime, at least to me, wants to stay underground in a sense that they want to run their operations without getting noticed.
1156032
The conflict comes from trying to control what we have no business controlling and cannot even though we try.\nfor we have no control and that is scaary, we cannot control population, religion or an out of control government and uncontrollable spending.
295896
Terrorism  started in middle east with palestines and jews.   They'd attack civilians for intimidation.  To nip it in the bud, there should've been mass education about its negative effects and moral consequences.  Also, take out the leaders of the terrorists.  \n\nToday, America and other western countries must stop attacking other religions and exploiting 3rd world countries.  They should also stop killing others.  Killing creates a need for revenge.  That is why they are attacking.\n\nIts a vicous cycle of escalating violence.  You kill my family, I will kill you.  You kill that individual and then someone else wants revenge.  And on the loop goes
482405
Is not considered but it is. You own people which you treat bad and beat them or even if you want you could kill them. That is terrorism because you are attacking people that do nothing against you.
511372
Yes, apparently there are at least statistical distributions that terrorism seems to follow, one of these distributions is the Power Law, that is there are far more small terrorist attacks than there are large ones.  The exact structure of how many small ones there are, how many medium sized ones, etc follow a well defined distribution.  \n\nIdeally these mathematical properties may help us in determining when and where an attack may take place, and hence may help us to defend against one.\n\nIn other fields mathematical properties are used to profile trading behavior of people in the stock exchange, and the SEC has used some of these models to successfully nail insider traders.  The IRS has also used these models to locate people cheating on their taxes.
109813
According to the dictionary, a terrorist is "One that engages in acts or an act of terrorism."\n\nTerrorism is defined as "The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons."\n\nAccording to these definitions, there are members of PETA who do qualify for the terrorist label. That being said, unless the organazation supports and condones these activities, the organazation itself is not a terrorist organization.
882127
terrorists at least have an agenda, however stupid and misguided.gang members are just as dangerous, just without any reason. a terrorist will give you a righteous speech about why he does what he does, a gang member will probably just laugh. nevertheless they both need to be dealt with and i don't see a reason why there should be difference in their punishment.
423852
Firstly,I heared alot about terrorism and its connection to Islam. so i think by false that Islam=terrorism. when i chat muslims i found them normal people but i think they know what they want and they trust their God completely.so I think that Terrorism have not any connection with Islam and muslims who kill, burn and explode are only bad people which fill all countries and all religions.
119814
TERRORISTS ARE KILLERS THAT WANT TO IMPOSE OR TAKE SOMETHING (a religion,land,wealth/resources,a port etc)\nHUMANITY HAS ALWAYS HAD SMALL segment OF KILLERS. GLOBAL COMMUNICATION ALLOWS GROUPS TO BE EASILY LEAD BY KILLER FANATICS THAT PROMISE WEALTH OR "GOD" REWARD..\nMankind as a whole, has survived because this element must be killed or contained to secure the safety of all mankind.\nMankinds history is full of wars caused by this segment of killer "leaders" that seek to obtain THEIR goals \nPopulation size does not negate peaceful co-existance with neighbors even if they have a different culture or beliefs.\nTODAY, the weapons are more lethal and can effect even isolated populations so the danger is greater.
342925
Religion, and its social impact on morality and war.
366407
Conflict is essential to growth of the society. History has proved that. So it is necessary that difference of opinion are expressed and they clash with each other. \n\n"Let a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of thought contend" - Chairman Mao Tse Tung