may nyc police take dna from a person of interest without his consent or a warrrant?
490654
once it is deemed trash and thrown out by the person of interest, it no longer (DNA and all) belongs to the person and the police can go trash picking all they want and do whatever with it.  This does run into some seroius ethical issues, so it is not commonly used.
1082706
With todays DNA testing the answer must be Yes !\n\nAnd when it comes back of course you can ... everyone needs a hobby.
752549
This is extremely unlikely unless you are in the bootlegger's house when they are there to arrest him.  Copyright infringement is not high on the list of priorities for police services, despite those dire FBI warnings on movies and such.
91264
deoxyribonucleic acid-but you dont really need to know that
1105291
yes, but you will need a warrant from the FBI or  a local law office.  This is considered private info. and there has to be a  legal reason for wanting it.
1017
The route for this would be to file a civil claim for the benefits. As part of the evidentiary process, DNA samples could be taken from his relatives and your son to determine if he is related to the deceased without exhuming the body. I would talk to a local civil estate lawyer.
921459
probably.  ask your local city government/police.
225385
The NYPD should be able to give you that info.
735770
The police need a warrant to get your medical records without your consent.  If a doctor gives up that information without your consent, it cannot be used in a court of law.  If you are afraid your rights have been violated get an attorney.
984028
It may not be illegal, but it would be stupid. Your family would most likely call out the police to find you, and they'd be wasting money and man-hours to do so, which you'd most likely be liable for. Please tell me you've at least met this guy and know him well enough to be making this decision...
149063
Simple. Semen is collected from a rape victim. Suspect is never identified but genetic profile is logged in FBI database. Years later a suspect in another crime gives a DNA sample. It matches the previous rape. He gets charged with that as well, and convicted due to such strong evidence. This is just one of many possible examples.
559686
There is a procedure for having a party be subjected to a physical examination by a doctor.  If the person you want examined is not a party, you would need a court order.  \n\nSimilarly, if you need to test the DNA of a party, for example in a paternity suit, there is a procedure for giving a party notice.  If it is a non-party you will need a court order.\n\nIf the party fails to appear, then you will need to get a court order compelling appearance.\n\nIn order to have the court order someone to have a physical or donate a DNA sample, you will have to show why this evidence is important to the case.\n\nNote these procedures can only be used once there is a casee on file with the court and the defendant has filed an answer.
1072280
usually not that would be a breach of privacy unless they are a sex offender... the police have access to that info but they can not release it to the general public
155363
What would be the point.Only police investigators can accuratly determine that. Note  volume of same name like Smith are listed.
1177798
I would need more info. like what was he in custody for. If he was here illegally he was probably deported. If he has ties to any terrorist activity he is probably being held for interrogation somewhere. If it is for some other reason the FBI is not obligated to release the information to the public. I think your hands are tied until the person gets in touch with you.
138538
In general, absolutely.  But like any evidence it needs to be authenticated, and it will be excluded if it is not relevant (or if it contains hearsay, or is more prejudicial than probative, etc.)  It may also be excluded in a criminal case if it is a police recording obtained wwithout a warrant.
8803
Sounds like either a spam email, or a credit card charge for a DNA test.  I'd go with spam.