When science and technology can't create a drop of blood, what for it thinks it is supreme?
481927
No research is going on very fast. At laboratory stages artificial blood is already formed.Soon we will synthesize it in yhe lab.Blood substitutes are used to fill fluid volume and/or carry oxygen and other gases in the cardiovascular system. Although commonly used, the term is not accurate since human blood performs many important functions. Red blood cells transport oxygen, white blood cells defend against disease, platelets promote clotting, and plasma proteins provide various functions. The preferred and more accurate terms are volume expanders for inert products, and oxygen therapeutics for oxygen-carrying products. Examples of these two "blood substitute" categories:\nVolume expanders: inert and merely increase blood volume. These may be crystalloid-based (Ringer's lactate, normal saline, D5W (dextrose 5% in water)) or colloid-based (Haemaccel, Gelofusin). \nOxygen therapeutics: mimic human blood's oxygen transport ability. Examples: Hemopure, Oxygent, PolyHeme. \nOxygen therapeutics are in turn broken into two categories based on transport mechanism: perfluorocarbon based, and hemoglobin based.\nVolume expanders are widely available and are used in both hospitals and first reponse situations by paramedics and emergency medical technicians. Oxygen therapeutics are in clinical trials in the U.S. and Europe, however Hemopure is more widely available in South Africa.
78229
Whatever the answer be, a war is NEVER justified by the progress that science could make due to it... \n\nthink about the people who died because of the bombs, toxics, radiation, bullets...\n\nI've heard that some progress was made on the field of artificial blood...among others
996254
If you think science is so flawed why are you using a computer on the Internet?  You are using the machines created by the same scientists that you have so little respect for.  Doesn't that make you a hypocrite?
1085767
I was thinking blood, but without water, we couldn't have it.  Water is my vote (though I like the oil answer I saw).
152741
Nope this is not possible. Although it would be nice, wouldn't it? No more expensive tests and laboratory procedures.... :-)
562939
I have done a lot of research on the subject and most medical doctors think it is unecessary. It could dehydrate you I think.
662557
Well a lot of the people who will be shaping the technologies are talking about it.\n\nAs for the rest of the populus I suspect it is because those technologies haven't shown much ability yet so they just safely ignore them while a few idiots go out and protest against biotech, etc.\n\nWe also have a very big lack of knowledge of when it will happen and we have no idea what will be beyond the singularity so it probably seems like a vague concept to most people which wouldn't help awareness.
694214
This is a quesiton made for Doctors but i think i can add a point here,  there is a big gab between man and animals, for you to take the blood of animal and feed animal is like asking the dog in your community to send a mail from your mail box to a freind.  the brain of animals can never be equated with man.  the thought of animals can never balance with man too.Never in life should you think of using animal blood to man.  Man is made to be so high than any other thng in the world.  and talkign about the blood is the highest liquid that deserve respect than any other liquid on planet earth for now.  But tomorrow we can reach a point we will see a better liquid than Blood.  Please have respect and respect the liquid that is red in colour called BLOOD.  Thanks and God Bless US
502307
Their bloody doctrines are full of blood alright. There's hemoglobin everywhere. They must love the stuff. On the surface it's about being good and all that; below the surface it's all about blood. Blood this blood that. "Eat my flesh and drink my blood." From the start to the end it's mainly about blood. Who can bare such a thing? Perhaps they are made in the image of their god; that is, bloodthirsty? But they're not scary, amusing would be closer to the truth.
1039337
omigod no!!!\nhiesenbergs uncertainity principle stated in the most rudimentary manner is this\nFor exceeding small particles, its is not possible to accurately identify their mass and velocity at the same time. \nRead more about it here:\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle\nIt has ramifications in advanced physics like for wave-particle theories, and is an extremely interesting thing to ponder about, but IT CAN NOT EXPLAIN EVERYTHING, THE LEAST BEING WHY BLOOD IS RED IN COLOUR.\n\nIncidentally , blood is red in colour due to haemoglobin.\nRead more about it here:\nhttp://www.coolquiz.com/trivia/explain/docs/blood.asp
58158
I would think it would be just about impossible even if you ran water through the veins there should still be a few blood cells
454187
most things that scientists have made are duplicates of what God has already created but they have not be able to make LIFE. They cant make "real human" because the source of life is with God.
1145247
"No, I am not superstitious. I dont believe in that crap. Technology is just a tool created by man, nothing more. "\n\nSuperstitious???? How can something written almost 2,000 years ago be accurate today? Read Revelations Nukes, broadcasting, mark of the beast etc... are all in there. Technology is a tool created by man that will be abused by man! So my answer is absolutely this is setting the stage and the technology is just waiting to be abused by the Beast/one world order.\n\nOT
96556
you are right to some extent but it is important to publish as all the science work is dedicated to humanity....to serve it....it is man who is responsible how to handle it...like revolver can be used to prtect yourself and some use to kill other....i guess u agree!
483784
for teleporting one needs to convert himself in to the size of photons and then pass and at that level i dont think it is possible to see where one is going as there wont be any betweeen the brain and the rest of the body !\nand for this the available technology can not support \n\nsincerely speaking, i think that it is or was an alien technology not a thing made on earth . atleast not at that time!!\n\nAND ONE MORE THING IT WASNOT ANY ROMANIAN  ...NOT FOR THE FIRST TIMEATLEAST  !\n\nit was by some HINDU GOD<P.S. I AM A CHRISTIAN>
773936
most obviously not. \nyou can use the lastest technology to shoot somebody dead. All goverments spend tons of bucks for research how to kill people. \nBut then they also spend money for research via national science foundations to cure people of diseases or invent life-supporting technology. \nBut also if you use technology which could be live saving in an incorrect manner, you can do damage to a person. Look at the history of X-rays. Look at radiation treatments. \nAnd these are only the technical aspects. There are moral and psychological aspects as well which can be good or bad. Look at stem cell research debate for an obvious choice.
945323
science because it cannot survie inside their bodies. it is a fragil virus that needs the proper host for survival.