If a country has been ruled by military regime without the will of people, how can we get rid of the regime?
484919
First, through a concerted, non-violent protest by all citizens of the country at home and international fora. If it is responded by repression and harsher measures, then, through an armed revolution. Such moves are sure to be supported by all democratic and peace loving countries of the world.
1085093
unfortunately, yes.  as the commander in chief of the armed forces, the president can send them in to any place he wants, and technically they are supposed to follow his orders.  in the event that he doesnt leave office, impeachment obviously wouldnt work, and the only way to get rid of him would be to kill him, as Thomas Jefferson alluded to when he said that the people had the right and responsibility to overthrow a government that is corrupt and reestablish the old system.\n\nnow, to your question.  in debate on the house floor a few years ago (right before the invasion of iraq), representative mcdermott quoted an article from the Sydney Morning Herald titled, "Foundations are in Place for Martial Law in the United States."  Bascially, during the Iran-Contra Affair, Ronald Reagan issued an executive order giving FEMA even broader powers than Congress gave it, and among these powers were the ability to prevent violent and widespread internal dissent or national opposition against a US military invasion abroad through the use of the military, basically, declaring martial law.  all of reagans papers, including this order, were sealed by the bush administration.  therefore, we do not know the full story.  \n\ni hope that this answers your question.  ive got the whole speech, and id be happy to give it to you if you want it.
468065
They are an oppresive regime who supports terrorism but there's not much we can do about it.
453891
Its the reading of world history, abuse of power & molestation of peoples' & even the human rights were the ordrer of Autocracy & Monarchism. Many examples of the recent past stand there in support of the records in history.  \nSo, democratic system is the better choice that can stop the emergence of Autocratic regime & Monarchism which has alway been seen as curse to the people. \nYes, God is always there for any system we follow or we don't.
425139
i lived in thailand for 8 years,and their form of govt is parliamentary/monarchy and sad to say i could say they dont practice democracy,the military is so powerful and their is no due process in that country,but if you dont mess with the system you wont have problems...
106030
Democtic rule  is the constant balancing of 2 great truths of national leadership, as decided by the populace themselves.  \n\nPeople need freedom, and people need discipline.\n\nBut as hightower says...\n\nDiscipline without freedom is tyranny\n\nFreedom without discipline is choas.\n\n\nAll other political systems fall into one or the other of the last two examples, I believe.
312947
who knows, we don't have any control over our government...
910002
Nope. There will always be those types of people who will take advantage of the "weaker" people. When I say weaker, I mean those people who are physically or perhaps even emotionally or mentally not as strong as others. If there was no government, you would have roving bands of folks going around and taking things from others and forcing others off their land. Eventually, these bands would form dictatorships. To counteract these bands, you would have regular folks ban together into Militias or something like that. And these Militias would either work democratically or have some sort of leader. Ultimately, you would have to set down rules to get together. Ultimately, these rules would have to be enforced when folks broke them. The bigger the group, the more rules that get broken and the more time you need to spend enforcing the rules. Suddenly, it makes sense to have a smaller group do all the enforcing and that group becomes the intervention of an outside authority. One of the ideas of the Bolsheviks was to have a dictatorship of the proletariat for about 5 years after the revolution and then all the people would govern themselves in a model communist utopia. That 5 years became 70 and eventually the USSR broke up and communism stopped there without this utopia where the people governed themselves knowing exactly what is good for them.\n\nThe trouble is that, even in this day and age where everyone is supposedly reasonable, people really aren't that reasonable. People are selfish. They want more than their fair share. Then some people come up with crazy ideas that they want to impose on everyone else. There is a major irrational side to every human being. It causes people to rape and murder and take drugs and do all kinds of things they shouldn't. It also causes love and compassion. This side will always be in humans and will always cause some people to do some stupid and some good things. Because of this, unless you have a really small group, you will always need the intervention of an outside authority.
65581
what military?.. they have a military?.. thats a new one on me.. \n\nseriously though.. they really dont have one to speak of.. several years ago in the intrest of being a "peace loving" nation.. they cut funding for just about everything.. if anyone wanted to overthrow them it would not be difficult
246097
A STATE CANNOT HAVE ANY LEGITIMATE POWERS UNLESS THEY ARE GIVEN TO IT BY ITS CITIZENS\nIf government officials decide one day that no one should work on Sunday, even assuming the community generally supports their decision, where would they get the authority to use the police power of the state to enforce such a decree? Individual citizens don’t have right to compel their neighbours not to work, so they can’t delegate that right to their government. \nWhere, then, would the state get the authority? The answer is that it would come from itself; it would be self-generated. It would be similar to the divine right of ancient monarchies in which it was assumed that governments represent the power and the will of God – as interpreted by their earthly leaders, of course. \nIn more modern times, most governments don’t even pretend to have God as their authority, they just rely on swat teams and armies, and anyone who objects is eliminated. As that well-known collectivists, Mao Tse-Tung, phrased it: “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.”
371103
No.  No country will ever rise the expectations of their citizens.  The only thing that can be done is to minimize the evils of the powerful.
145730
After overthrowing an evil regime, would you think it smart to leave a country in ruins? The world learned a lesson after leaving Germany to rot after WWI, and look at what type of tyranical government came along after that.\n\nIn most cases of war, especially lately, it is not the case that a whole country is entirely against another. In the cases of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, it was more or less regime toppling and terror hunting. It is important for the people in those countries to experience the benefits of a free form of government and give them the chance of a peaceful future. This could help ensure more stability and good relations.
884475
Our government isn't capable to do anything at will.
388950
Honestly, USA. We took over other people's land and called it our own. Our government and President sucks. Most of the people in the country don't know about their own Constitution. And there is always something corrupt in the White House now-a-days.
1095495
Every country has the government and political system it deserves. That includes the electoral rules and systems.\n\nSo if things are not right (and I agree that they are not right), the people will have to act accordingly.\n\nNo country can be ruled or controlled against the will of the people. However, if the people are too dumb, ignorant or lazy to care for their own future, you get a country like the USA.\n\nThose who don't care will be taken care of.
868381
We should leave them alone.  Or perhaps you might be suggesting we enslave them, in a figurative sense of the word, by forcing them to live like westerners.  We may have the best system here in the west, but it is obvious, like in Iraq, that not all people are cut out to make a democracy work.  Interference would mean more war and more reconstruction.  Things are moving slow enough in Iraq, we really don't need to expand on our problems.
103961
it is something that america cannot control if their government follows its own laws.\n\nhowever, the CIA and U.S. army could pretty much knock aside any dictator it saw fit given that they didn't care about public opinion or bad press.