What is the minimum/maximum jail time for Burglary 2 (Breaking and entering )in Oregon?
493773
Burglary 2 is not necessarily breaking and entering. It is entering a building with the intent to commit a crime there. That is a Class C felony, punishable by up to 5 years and up to $125,000 with no mandatory minimum. Breaking and entering would more likely fall under criminal trespass, a class A misdemeanor. Look at the sites below for a full definition of each of the crimes.
618943
Statues of limitations are typically written by state governments and therefore it is dependant on what state the crime was committed in.  I would guess it should be 10 years or less, but that depends on the actual crime itself too.  Flashing is a sex crime and so is aggrivated rape and obviously they will have differnt laws governing them.  Misdemeanors will likely have a limit of 2-5 years or less and felony's should be significantly longer.
242568
Try this link. It will get you to the limitations of each class of crime. You will need to know if you are looking for the limitation on a felony or misdemeanor....\n\n  http://onlinedocs.andersonpublishing.com/oh/lpExt.dll?f=templates&fn=main-h.htm&cp=PORC\n\nHere is the text:\n\n2901.13. Limitation of criminal prosecutions.\n \n (A) (1)  Except as provided in division (A)(2) or (3) of this section or as otherwise provided in this section, a prosecution shall be barred unless it is commenced within the following periods after an offense is committed:  \n\n (a) For a felony, six years;  \n (b) For a misdemeanor other than a minor misdemeanor, two years;  \n (c) For a minor misdemeanor, six months.  \n (2) There is no period of limitation for the prosecution of a violation of section 2903.01 or 2903.02 of the Revised Code.  \n  (3) Except as otherwise provided in divisions (B) to (H) of this section, a prosecution of any of the following offenses shall be barred unless it is commenced within twenty years after the offense is committed:  \n  (a) A violation of section 2903.03, 2903.04, 2905.01, 2907.02, 2907.03, 2907.04, 2907.05, 2907.21, 2909.02, 2911.01, 2911.02, 2911.11, 2911.12, or 2917.02 of the Revised Code, a violation of section 2903.11 or 2903.12 of the Revised Code if the victim is a peace officer, a violation of section 2903.13 of the Revised Code that is a felony, or a violation of former section 2907.12 of the Revised Code;  \n  (b) A conspiracy to commit, attempt to commit, or complicity in committing a violation set forth in division (A)(3)(a) of this section.  \n  (B)  If the period of limitation provided in division (A)(1) or (3) of this section has expired, prosecution shall be commenced for an offense of which an element is fraud or breach of a fiduciary duty, within one year after discovery of the offense either by an aggrieved person, or by the aggrieved person's legal representative who is not a party to the offense.  \n  (C)  If the period of limitation provided in division (A)(1) or (3) of this section has expired, prosecution shall be commenced for an offense involving misconduct in office by a public servant as defined in section 2921.01 of the Revised Code, at any time while the accused remains a public servant, or within two years thereafter.  \n  (D)  An offense is committed when every element of the offense occurs. In the case of an offense of which an element is a continuing course of conduct, the period of limitation does not begin to run until such course of conduct or the accused's accountability for it terminates, whichever occurs first.  \n  (E)  A prosecution is commenced on the date an indictment is returned or an information filed, or on the date a lawful arrest without a warrant is made, or on the date a warrant, summons, citation, or other process is issued, whichever occurs first. A prosecution is not commenced by the return of an indictment or the filing of an information unless reasonable diligence is exercised to issue and execute process on the same. A prosecution is not commenced upon issuance of a warrant, summons, citation, or other process, unless reasonable diligence is exercised to execute the same.  \n  (F)  The period of limitation shall not run during any time when the corpus delicti remains undiscovered.  \n (G)  The period of limitation shall not run during any time when the accused purposely avoids prosecution. Proof that the accused departed this state or concealed the accused's identity or whereabouts is prima-facie evidence of the accused's purpose to avoid prosecution.  \n  (H)  The period of limitation shall not run during any time a prosecution against the accused based on the same conduct is pending in this state, even though the indictment, information, or process which commenced the prosecution is quashed or the proceedings thereon are set aside or reversed on appeal.  \n  (I)  As used in this section, "peace officer" has the same meanin
330913
Ask you attorney or look in the your state's penal code book.
1135395
DATE: \n          thieves' attacking hours...\n\nTIME:\n          night-time\n\nthus:\n         like a thief in the night..\n         WHO KNOWS??? ask a burglar ...........P
592737
I know in San Bernardino County, right next door, the presumption for first degree burg is the low term in prison.\n\nThe person's lawyer will have more info than anyone on Yahoo answers will be able to give you.
134038
title 1, article 3 section 5 subsection b of the illinois compiled statutes (ILCS) 720 ILCS 5 says:\n\n(b) Unless the statute describing the offense provides otherwise, or the period of limitation is extended by Section 3‑6, a prosecution for any offense not designated in Subsection (a) must be commenced within 3 years after the commission of the offense if it is a felony, or within one year and 6 months after its commission if it is a misdemeanor. \n(Source: P.A. 93‑834, eff. 7‑29‑04; 94‑487, eff. 11‑9‑05; 94‑683, eff. 11‑9‑05.)\n\n( from:  http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs4.asp?DocName=072000050HArt%2E+3&ActID=1876&ChapAct=720%26nbsp%3BILCS%26nbsp%3B5%2F&ChapterID=53&ChapterName=CRIMINAL+OFFENSES&SectionID=60572&SeqStart=4700000&SeqEnd=5600000&ActName=Criminal+Code+of+1961%2E )\n\nthe section that describes the crime of burglary (720 ILCS 5 Article 19) does not make any provision for a different statute of limitation.  (see first link in sources below.)\n\nso, 3 years from the event sounds like the answer.
779873
call the local police dept. there.\n\nor check Google Earth - it has some crime stats.
1106552
That will depend on which State you are referring to, each State has its own classification for crimes as well as the recommended time for each classification.  check your local statutes on line or at your local library.  You could be more specific and I could answer a bit more specific
190926
I know the maximum sentence is 1 year in jail... not sure about the maximum fine.
1035407
In Missouri a second degree assault is considered a class C felony.  The punishment is "not to exceed 7 years."  So basically the maximum prison sentence is 7 years.  As it is a first offense they probably won't seek the maximum.  There is always the chance that you'll have a good judge, or that the DA will offer you a plea bargain.  GOOD LUCK!
853180
depends on the state and the charges my friend had a warrent from oklahoma and got arrested in california for it and he was sent back to oklahoma and had prison time
207205
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. TEDDY LEE WALL\n\n\nNo. 417PA97\n\n\n(Filed 30 July 1998)\n\n\n1.    Burglary and Unlawful Breakings § 173 (NCI4th)-- burglary -- sentencing -- defendant on parole for prior offenses -- plea bargain -- sentence consecutive\n\n\n    The trial court erred by directing that defendant's sentence be served concurrently rather than consecutively where defendant received a ten-year sentence for larceny and breaking and entering in 1989, with probation; defendant's parole was revoked; he was subsequently paroled again and the parole was again revoked; before the notice of the last parole revocation reached the Department of Correction, defendant entered into a plea agreement for second-degree burglary, larceny, and breaking or entering which called for a consolidated judgment of twenty- five years; the agreement and judgment did not provide for a consecutive or concurrent sentence; the Department of Correction eventually modified defendant's record to reflect that the last sentence was to be consecutive pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 14-52; and defendant filed a motion for appropriate relief which was granted. In accord with the plain meaning of N.C.G.S. § 14-52 (effective until 1 January 1995), defendant's sentence for burglary could commence only at the expiration of the 1989 sentence because he was already serving the 1989 sentence.\n\n\n2.    Criminal Law § 131 (NCI4th Rev.)-- plea agreement -- burglary -- concurrent sentence -- defendant entitled to benefit of bargain -- defendant not entitled to specific performance\n\n\n    A defendant who entered into a plea agreement in 1994 under which several 1993 cases, including burglary, were consolidated for judgment was entitled to the benefit of his bargain where defendant, his attorney, and the prosecutor understood that the 1994 sentence was to run concurrently with the sentence defendant was already serving. However, defendant is not entitled to specific performance because that would violate the law of the state. Defendant may withdraw his plea and proceed to trial or attempt to negotiate another agreement that does not violate N.C.G.S. § 14-52. \n\n    On writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(b) to review an order entered by Caldwell, J., on 7 January 1997 in Superior Court, Gaston County, allowing defendant's motion for appropriate relief and ordering that defendant's sentences be served concurrently, not consecutively. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 February 1998.\n\n    Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, for the N.C. Department of Correction petitioner-appellant.\n\n\n    Henry L. Fowler, III, for defendant-appellee.\n\n\n    North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services, Inc., by Winnifred H. Dillon, amicus curiae.\n\n\n\n    FRYE, Justice.\n\n\n    In this case we decide: (1) whether the superior court's order directing that defendant's sentences be served concurrently was in violation of N.C.G.S. § 14-52, and (2) whether defendant is entitled to a remedy for his reliance on the validity of his plea agreement.\n\n    This case developed as follows: On 12 December 1989, defendant received a ten-year suspended sentence upon his plea of guilty to several charges of larceny and breaking and entering and was placed on supervised probation. On 16 July 1991, defendant's probation was revoked, and his ten-year suspended sentence was activated. On 5 August 1992, the North Carolina Parole Commission gave notice of its intent to parole defendant from the activated sentence, and he was subsequently paroled. On 30 December 1993, defendant's parole was again revoked, reactivating his 1989 sentence.\n\n    On 26 July 1994, defendant entered into a plea agreement in case number 93CRS5858 to the offenses of second-degree burglary and felonious larceny and in case number 93CRS28258 to felonious breaking or entering and felonious larceny under which it was agreed that the
772445
it all depends on what you are stealing and how old you are...If you are stealing from a retail store and you are under the age of 18 or above the age of 60 you can steal whatever you want and get away with it. Now if you are stealing large amounts of money you will probably land yourself in prison for 20 years...I would personally choose the first one, I just have to wait until I'm 60.
958998
The national standard is 20yrs, with the possibility of parole in 10yrs... if he stays out of trouble in prison he most likely will serve no more than 8yrs in a medium security prison...
1062492
It depends on the misdemeanor and the state.
834569
It depends on what state you're in.  In my state the maximum penalty for a class A misdemeanor is one year in jail AND a $5,000 fine, unless it's a traffic crime, then the fine goes up to $6,250.\n\nFirst degree trespass, eh?  Sounds like you should have left their house when they told you, not gone to their house to begin with, or stayed away from railroad / public utility property :o)