Will the china use horses for battle in the last war?
480682
When a Chinese chorse mis-behaved, the horse is stanpped to the groud and they drop a length of barbed wired and give the horse one thousand lashes.\n\nThat way it will perform in battle
1147093
The correct answer is: it depends on the conditions.  Each tank was designed for a particular type of battle - on its own 'turf' each tank would defeat the other.
1029548
The answer will be found with the Chinese.  Some would say they are on a course towards war with the "West" right now.  Conspiracy theorist on the wacko right even suggest China is behind al queda so they can learn more about our tactics, weaknesses, etc.  I don't buy that one.  \n\nChina has serious problems providing for its masses; food, water, energy, and oil are serious problems for the country and they may begin to the view the US as an ugly opponent for those things.  "IF" they can turn the US into a 3rd world nation that doesn't compete for resources we'll probably be fine.  If we remain a first world nation that bids higher on oil supplies and charges more for our vast agricultural resources then it could happen.
54960
Bush has said the US will defend Taiwan.  The problem is, there are so many Chinese in mainland China ... they would overwhelm us in a conventional war.
927731
Rite now, Uncle Sam would prevail.  Clearly, Red China has the numbers advantage, but Uncle Sam's got the war tools.  The US does NOT want to get into a land-war w/ Red China.  Also, consider the major economic ties, which exist between Uncle Sam and Red China.  Allahu Akbar.
1141021
Japanese won't fight this battle but they do have a good navy and good army. They are planning for something big in the region. They will not give up easily. They are looking to take Taiwan again. The US and the Japanese have a military cooperation thing. The Japanese are going to try to drag the states into the whole thing with China and Taiwan. It is happening already.
1076474
well it is china (even japan said the US will lose if we figth china)\nwell it will just make more war but the real reason is that there is no point in putting money in a country when you can not take something back (ie iraq = oil)
962770
Are you saying that China is trying to secure resources?\n\nThat they are using foreign aid to advance their own cause?\n\nThat money/goods are used to influence?\n\nThat instead of armed invasion a less costly means of securing future resources is to 'help' local governments?\n\nThat the world is falling into patterns of expanding and contracting empires? Wow glad I was sitting for this question.
872948
I would not worry.\nIf the Chinese build their tanks,warplanes and warships,with the same care  and attention,that they used when assembling the goods that they export to the UK,\nThen they will be lucky to move their armed forces more that 20miles from Beijing.
1164889
lol  what??????  china has the BIGGEST army with over a million soldiers
1052926
Disney's "Mulan" was the last animated movie I watched from Disney.  It had a historical plot and timeline well before the 1949 Chinese communist revolution.\n\nYou bet Communist China allows--even encourages--women to join the People's Liberation Army!\n\nRemember, the communist-nationalistic ideology spewed on their citizens by the Chinese Communist Party encourages military service across all races, genders, and levels of society.\n\nThe military is viewed as a stepping stone for most to improve their lot in life and as a tool for the communist leaders to strengthen their nation.\n\nMake no mistake about it, communists believe in domination and control, and they lie to the people by getting them to think they are doing revolutionary things that help their nation.\n\nMillions of Russian women fought in the Soviet armed forces during WWII, which hadn't ever happened prior to the 1917 revolution.\n\nI don't mean to say their sacrifices weren't important or that they were not needed to defend mother Russia, because they most definately were.  It was the fact that their willingness to serve, fight and die in a war was twisted into becoming a tool of communist soviet leaders.\n\nStay tuned, folks.  Communist China will supplant the USA as the world's only superpower.  You heard it here first.  After years of shopping at Wal-Mart, the USA will have transferred our wealth and power to the Far East, and Communist China will then blackmail the USA to its knees!\n\nRemember the Dubai Ports deal that raised such a brew-ha-ha and was eventually scuttled?\n\nHow many people recall in 1998 President Clinton giving away the lease rights to the Naval Station adjacent to the Port of Long Beach to the Chinese-communist-controlled, Hong Kong corporation Hutchison-Whampoa?  Do you also remember that same company underhandedly beat out other firms to operate the ports on BOTH sides of the Panama Canal?\n\nWhere was the brew-ha-ha then?
949340
Probably so...\n\nhttp://www.heritage.org/Research/RussiaandEurasia/BG1459.cfm\n\nEspecially in light of this...\n\nhttp://www.spacewar.com/reports/Fighting_An_Asymmetrical_Chinese_War_Machine_999.html\n\nand this....\n\nhttp://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/11/24/061124134543.qth288nm.html
684583
Have we not had enough wars?  What did we gain so far?  Disrepect from the rest of the world from what I can gather talking with people around the world.  \nOn what ground do we wage a war with China?  We'll be shooting ourselves in the foot again, and big time!
521446
It'll be a major economic power, but not like a power that'll rule the world.  Those days are over.\n\nIf anything, China will be the next superpower.
131838
At the current time we do not have enough troops to attack anyone else.  North Korea has one of the largest armies in the world, never mind that if we attacked them China might get involved and join the war against us.  And if you think the war in Iraq is bad a war with North Korea could easily cost us 1000 soldiers every 2 weeks or so instead of every year
18581
I think so.  China has a huge military.  But the US military is far more advanced.  Thats why the chinese military is striving to be like the US.  I think it would be nasty, violent, and numerous casualties, but the US would win in the end.
55216
Not in my lifetime.  As long as the USN controls the seas, it won't happen.  Remember, the German army couldn't even get across the English Channel in WWII, and the Chinese Army certainly isn't going to cross the Pacific anytime soon.  Heck, their navy currently isn't capable of extended blue-water operations, much less supporting an amphibious assault all the way across the Pacific.