Can personal injury statute of limitations move to time limit for motor vehicle injuries if caused by car door
476733
almost definitely no.  This injury did not arise from operating a motor vehicle, it arose from the cop's error.
1081484
I went to court because of my parents divorce about 4 years ago. It ranges from 1 to like 5 hours according to the reason your there and how long it takes a judge to reach a verdict. \n\nThe amount of times you go there depends on the reason your in court. A simple car accident might keep you coming to court for about 1 to 3 days depending on how it all went down.\n\nThe length of each break ( called a recess) depends on the judge. Your attorney can request a recess, I mean if you have one. Also if the judge needs time to reach a verdict.
878003
Wisconsin requires that all medical malpractice actions for personal injury or death be filed within three years from the date of injury. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 893.55(1) (West 1997). The statute also provides that a claimant may bring an action for medical malpractice within one year from the date of discovery, subject to a maximum limit of five years from the date of the negligent act. Id. However, the five-year limit was recently held to be unconstitutional insofar as it applied to a claimant who could not reasonably have known of her injury, which was caused by a failure to diagnose cancer, until after five years had passed. Estate of Makos v. Wisconsin Masons Health Care Fund, 211 Wis. 2d 41, 564 N.W.2d 662 (1997). Foreign object cases must be brought within one year from the date of discovery or three years from the date of the incident. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 893.55(3) (West 1997).\n\nActions brought by or on behalf of a minor are subject to the above-noted limitation, or such actions must be brought by the time the minor reaches ten years of age, whichever is later. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 893.56 (West 1997). For claimants who are disabled by reason of insanity, an action may be commenced two years from the date the disability has been lifted, with a maximum of five years from the date of the negligent act. Wis. Stat. Ann. § 893.16 (West 1997).
563625
Section 340.5 of the Code of Civil Procedures states that an action must be commenced within 3 years of the injury or 1 year of when a person reasonably should have or did discover the injury, whichever is first, unless "(1) upon proof of fraud, (2) intentional concealment, or (3) the presence of a foreign body, which has no therapeutic or diagnostic purpose or effect, in the person of the injured person." Further, if the injured party was a minor, they have 3 years or if under 6 at the time of injury, until 8 or three years, whichever is longer. This limitation does not begin if the parents and/or insurer commit fraud or collude to fail to bring an action on the minor's behalf.
662204
It varies from state to state but it varies from 6 months to 4 years...I'll try to obtain the CA requirement and update the answer for you. Also, the date of the statute starts when the problem is discovered, not when the procedure took place...very important!\n\n*****UPDATE!!!\n\nHere ya go!!\n\nA medical malpractice action for injury or death must be brought within one year from the date the claimant discovered the negligent act, but no more than three years from the date of injury. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 340.5 (West 1992). For retained foreign body cases, the statute is tolled until the claimant discovers or should have discovered the injury. Ashworth v. Memorial Hosp. of Long Beach, 206 Cal. App. 3d 1046, 254 Cal. Rptr. 104 (1988), rehearing denied, March 23, 1989.\n\nActions by or on behalf of minors must be brought within three years from the date of the negligent act, unless the child is under the age of six, in which case the action must be commenced within three years or prior to the child's eighth birthday, whichever provides the longer time period. Id. It is notable that the statutory period begins to run for adults at the time of discovery but for minors at the time of the negligent act. Although the California Supreme Court has yet to address this anomaly, other courts have begun to read a discovery rule into the provision for minors, on the theory that not to do so would deny minors the equal protection of the law. Photias v. Doerfler, 45 Cal. App. 4th 1014, 53 Cal. Rptr. 2d 202 (1996); Katz v. Children's Hospital of Orange County, 28 F.3d 1520 (9th Cir. 1994).\n\nIf a claimant is insane, a guardian can be appointed to permit the claim to be brought within the required time limit. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 372 (West Supp. 1998).
878536
Call an attorney in your area and find out the time limit.
223601
No theres no time limit but there should be a court date set within 2 weeks of getting the ticket(sometimes 3 weeks)...I would call the court house and find out
557465
Answer me back...what state did this accident occur in....\n\nDifferent insurance rules apply from state-to-state as there is no unifying federal insurance guidelines.\n\nThere are also different programs in different states.\n\nThere may be something on his or other family members auto policies that may help.\n\n\n---edit info---CALIFORNIA\n\nThis may not mean too much to you at this point in your life but I'll keep it rather simple...\n\nCalifornia is not a "No-Fault" or "PIP" state so the automobile coverage will be limited as follows:\n\nAutomobile MedPay policy:\n\nHe could file a Medical Payments claim under his own auto policy.\n\nHe could file a Medical Payments claim under the vehicle owner's policy if it was someone else's car\n\nHe could file a Medical Payments claim under the policy of a family member with whom he resides.\n\nThese auto MedPay policies usually have limits of $1,000-$10,000 and will help somewhat.\n\nSecond, if the accident was not his fault...\n\n(1) He could file a liability claim against the at fault party's insurance carrier.\n(2) If the accident was caused by a hit and run driver that cannot be identified he coould possibly file an uninsured motorist claim against his own auto policy.\n\nIf this friend was working at time...he could file a Workers Compensation claim on his enployer's WC carrier.\n\nEach CAlifornia County has an indigent care program on top of Medicare and Medi-Cal programs offered at federal and state levels.\n\nThis male friend's best choice of coverage for this is "Medi-Cal" if there is no automobile or Workers Compensation policies applicable to accident.\n\nBelow are links for (1) AM Best digest of state insurance laws... Very Dry reading.\n(2) California Medcare program\n(3) California Medi-Cal program\n\nHope this shows you how important it is to be fully insured in case this happens later to you.
1049080
It would be the statute of limitations for malpractice, which is 30 months.
619957
First of all, assuming the mismanagement is an ongoing issue the statute of limitations would likely not be seen as having begun to run.  However, if this is a past issue then it might start from the date of the last action of mismanagement or it might start from the date of the realization of the mismanagement, which could be recent.  Regardless, this issue will be likely litigated in court if at all applicable.\n\nHowever, only a lawyer licensed in Illinois can advise you how the Statute of Limitations might apply in Illinois.
693453
More info required, before even a comment could be offered. Suggest you refer a good attorney, a.s.a.p., like maybe yesterday, so that the statuate of limitations, if applicable in your case does not come into force\n\nst/
863890
Depends on the applicable state's statute of limitations. It varies from state to state.
1035183
I have not found the hit and run statute for California, but I am wiling to bet that it says that if you hit an automobile and cause damage to it, and fail to remain at the scene it is a crime. Likewise if you hit an an automobile and cause injury to a passenger, and fail to remain at the scene it is also a crime.\nSo leaving the scene of a property damage accident is one count and leaving the scene of a personal injury accident is the second count.
810342
There are many limits. Laws vary by region and some states restrict certain lawsuits. I advise you to go look for some information on your state.
1065558
That depends entirely on the facts of the case and the penalty is at the discretion of a judge.\n\nReckless driving, for example won't get you as much time as you would if it were a DUI related manslaughter.
1135959
If suit has been filed within the time frame (usually 2 years for most torts) then the statute of limitations does not apply.  You have been served have notice and must respond within the time stated on service of process or you will lose by default.  Check with your insurance you may have coverage for this.
816128
That isn't how statutes of limitations work.  Statutes of limitations are designed to prevent lawsuits from being brought too long after the alleged wrong has occurred.  For example, if someone assaults you, you can't sue them 20 years later, you have to sue them within the time limit established by the statute of limitations, which varies from state to state.  As you've already initiated a case and seem to have won, the statute of limitations doesn't apply.  \n\nI think what you're asking is if there's a statutorily defined time by which any monies you win in court must be paid by.  The answer is "Probably not", but the losing party will of course be bound to abide by whatever payment schedule is ordered by the court.  You can assume that the court order on this subject is going to comply with the law.  Judges aren't dumb.\n\nIf you're looking to get that money faster, there are companies out there that will buy that equity from you for a smaller lump sum up front.  I don't recommend it, as you wind up with less money than you would if you just waited it out, but you can get the money faster that way.