Subconscious contents specifically attitudes/predispositions/motivators have genetic origin.Right?
485982
Some do and some are learned.
870015
genes, are made up of coded information. It is these codes or mutations of code that contain information that determine your characteristics.
463562
When you were born does not determine personality.  Heredity and environment determine personality, regardless of what astrologists try to tell you.
721873
THAT PRETTY LAME IF YOU ASK ME.GENETICS AND GENES AND CHROMOSONES ARE THE CONSTANT ENVIRONMENTMENTALLY UNFRIENDLY OR MAYBE FRIENDLY COMPONETS THAT DESIGN A HUMAN BABY. HOW THE CHILD WILL APPEAR LIKE HAIR COLOR SEX EYE COLOR AND IF THEY CAN HEAR OR SEE ARE ALL GENETICALLY INSPIRED.IF YOUR A MALE TAKE A LOOK AT YOU OWN MOM AND HER DAD.IF YIUR FEMALE LOOK AT YOUR DAD AND HIS MOM.DNA WILL DEFINITELY GIVE YO AND IDEA WHAT YOU WILL APPEAR WHEN YOUR OLDER.
108053
Sure, \ntry www.genetic-programming.com It's Dr Koza's page.... you'll need some time to find the information.
476174
This is a very good question, here is what I have come up with already. I have depression so it need to do more research too. If you have any other questions, or learn anything else interesting let me know.\n\nAccording to http://www.irishhealth.com/index.html?level=4&id=2580 "It is generally accepted that depression tends to run in families. But how much of this familial tendency is due to shared genes and how much is due to shared environment? "\n\nHere is another that says yes. http://www.depression.realage.com/content.aspx/topic/16\n"Family, twin, and adoption studies have indicated that genetic factors are involved in the development of mood disorders (affective disorders). Potential genetic markers (that is, specific traits present on the genes) have been identified on specific chromosomes (Souery et al 1977). Some of these markers are directly linked to neurobiological processes, believed to be related to the occurrence of major depression. "\n\nFor more information about Genetics and Depression check out these sites:\n\nhttp://www.psycom.net/depression.central.genetics.html
303607
OK, I can see how they may be confusing, and really have only tinges of differences.\nSociological generalization is based on research.  For instance: Based on research we might conclude that people living below the poverty level are more likely to have a lower level of education than those living above the poverty level.  It is not one hundred percent correct but is based on statistics and research.\nStereotypes are generally not based on research, instead they are based on assumptions of the general public.  Thus, they are more often wrong than not.  \nBoth are used to simplify the world in which we live, and neither can be one hundred percent correct.
306747
Interesting puzzle:\nfMRI studies have shown that neurons in the brain associated with a task begin to fire about 800 milliseconds before the person is even aware that they want to perform an action.\n\nDo we have no free will? \n\n\nMed Hypotheses. 2001 Mar;56(3):364-6.\nIf there were no free will: Fisher CM.\n\n\nElectrophysiological findings in humans who are performing voluntary acts, indicate that the intention to act, follows brain activity rather than preceding it. This has implications for voluntary behavior and the doctrine of free will. This essay reviews the fields of human behavior, including medicine, in which this new thesis might have far-reaching significance. Copyright 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.\n\nAn extract:\n\n...it should be pointed out\nthat somewhat the same conclusion may be reached on\nthe basis of rather elementary observation. Every thought,\nfeeling, inclination, intention, desire, every mental\nimpression no matter how brief or faint, must be created\nby nervous system activity. How else could they arise? Ideas would have to arise without a physical basis.\nNervous system activity must always precede. Every\nnuance of thought and feeling arises in and must be preceded\nby its own specific electrical configuration in the\nbrain. If one has the experience of ‘willing’ the nervous\nsystem to do something, the impression of ‘willing’ must\nhave been preceded by nervous system activity.\nOtherwise there would be no source and we are in the\nrealm of the supernatural. Before I think of anything, it\nmust first have taken form in my nervous system.\n\n\nTherefore: answer to your question would be 'nervous system activity'
200880
There is little/no evidence of homosexuality having a genetic basis. I'd advise you to check into NARTH. They're a secular research organization that does research into the roots of homosexuality. The lead members of the organization are former  leaders of prominent research groups and publishers of prominent journals (ex. American Psychological Association).\n\nTheir general consensus is that homosexuality results from social conditioning and childhood experiences. Check out the website below.
853788
It is genetic. The first source gives the information on a chromosomal difference and second and third sources are on brain differences, and the fourth source is on two identical twins raised in the same household with what appears to be different gender identities.
346093
If it's for a noble reason (i cannot come up with any), then yes.\n\nIf it's just a random urge, again, yes, so that you don't pass on the psycho gene and improve the human gene pool by removing yourself from it.
954706
You know hormones have great effects on your own behavior. Have you ever been very afraid, or angry? We are quite certain the human behavior is probabilistically influenced by heredity. The only argument left among scientist is the proportion of the heredity of behavior.
89438
first question:  I believe it is in the genes.  You either "get" words, or you don't\n\nSecond question (saved 2 points good for you)  I don't believe they do.  I'm not really sure what you mean.
390146
No, because such an instinct would probably be genetic. If there was such an error, then those people would not reproduce and therefore would not pass on that gene! The gay "error" you're talking about is not the same because it is not actually genetic in the hereditary sense.
382569
Ooooh, an opportunity to ramble!\n\nI think there is definitely something inherited about that feeling. If you 'believe' in natural selection (I can't believe I have to say that...), nature occasionally selected for those that were always looking for something better. This leaves us with a genetic legacy that survives today. \n\nI also think that certain features of modern society promote this idea. Advertising for instance is based on the idea that your life is not good enough. You need something more to make your life whole. Another example might be the idea of a soul mate. When nothing but perfection is good enough, you're bound to be disappointed.\n\nSo, to answer your question, a little bit of both probably.
1153424
There are a number of scientific studies that do just that. I've linked to Wikipedia which sums up some of them, but the overall conclusion is that sexual orientation is determined in utero and is due to a number of factors, not just genetics.\n\nThe identical twin studies, especially those where one twin was straight and one gay, indicated that there's more going on than genetics.\n\nSimon Levay's study of brain structure indicated that homosexuals have a larger hypothalamus than heterosexuals. There have been other studies showing that gay men think like straight women as the brain activity was observed.\n\nThere's a finger-length study, indicating that women with a certain middle finger length are more likely to be gay.\n\nThere are birth order studies, where straight male children were born first and a gay male child later, suggesting that there may be hormonal influence on sexual orientation.\n\nBut whatever you think, know that it is not chosen. No one would choose to be ostracized, ridiculed, and made to feel a lesser citizen.
438708
Some evidence suggests it, but no direct link has been discovered as of yet.  I, personally, don't believe there are direct genetic involvments with any addiction.  Genetic predispositions to addictive behavior, maybe, but not to any particular type of addiction.