Why do Muslims kill other people for the cartoon of Mohammad?
494113
Speaking as a muslim woman who actually knows what the Quran says and the hadith say, I would say they are just being extreme and pick and choose what to believe in.  In the hadiths, the Prophet (PBUH) always excused insult such as this and would actually be very angry at how the muslims of today are acting.  I say that I know what it says, because I was never taken to a school like they are over there and I never had the posers brainwash me.  They brainwash these people and put their own interpretations into their minds while ignoring the parts that go against what THEY feel.  They like to scream about having rights over women, but they ignore the second part of that very same sentence that says women have the same rights over men.  They are just hypocrites.  They disgust me and make me angry that this is the face they want to show the world.  It pisses me off.
488593
Jesus was mocked in cartoons and painting even more than Moham, but the Christians know better than picking up their pitch fork, and kill people, and burn their places of worship as the Muslims do so many times.\nAnd no, the number who rioted against the cartoon was large, not a few people, you should've watched the news better.\nA priest in Turkey was murder over the cartoon, and he has nothing to do it, the only reason was he was a christian and a Priest, innocent man.  I Pakistan, in Indonesia, Egypt, Syria, etc. \nThe world would NOT let a movie or a book be release about Mohammed, true or fiction, because we all are afraid of what the Muslim will do to us, and those who are not afraid! are being too PC even to the death of us all, physical or metaphysically.\n\nFor those who think the book has truth in it, try this for size!  Mohammed married a very young girl! his sons wife! a captive from one of his wars! had many slaves... just some.  What would the Muslim do if someone point them out in a book, or parish the thought a movie!  :0  heads will roll.
1053228
Why do u want to know about muslim killing muslim?
314771
The Mohammed cartoons did not limit any Muslim person's ability to practice their religion.\n\nMaking images of Mohammed is banned in Islam.  But this prohibition doesn't apply to non-Muslims, even though some Muslims seemed to think it does.\n\nAs a Catholic, I've seen and heard derogatory and offensive things about Catholicism that make the Mohammed cartoons look tame by comparison.  \n\nI think this kind of stuff is highly offensive -- but that's part of living in a society where we have free speech.  It means that occasionally, we have to put up with something offensive.\n\nOffensive anti-Catholic material is, to put it mildly, not what I like to see or read -- but I don't feel it has ever limited my ability to practice my religion.
80596
The Pakistani cleric that put this $1,000,000 bounty does not even know that it was a contest and the cartoons was  actually drawn by 12 cartoonists.\n\nIt is sad to see someone that thinks he knows God and set out a bounty on the wrong people.  Why would God want you to kill someone?  If God was upset, he would have struck all 12 down.  Some of the Islamic clerics are uneducated even in their own religion.
853300
for a muslim to kill, cheat, or lie to a non-muslim is completely accceptable behavior.....all are infidels ... and pigs and dogs.
452845
As far as I understand it, it is against their own religion.  Therefore they are being inconsistent and hypocritical.  Mohammed was a peaceful leader and yet they blasphemed his name themselves by rising up in such a violent way to 'protect' his good name during the incident of the cartoons.  What of the fact that they have slandered the Christian icon Jesus?  Yet, they don't expect Christians to rise up against them do they?  \nOr is that what they want?  Another holy war to make life interesting?  To lose their loved ones in bitter rage in the name of religions that have both preached peace and love (in spite of admitting only one God)?\nIf it were a matter of severe oppression and humiliation it would be understandable, but still not justified in the eyes of their own religion.  But it is not.  Muslims are accepted worldwide nowadays due to religious tolerance.  They are making THEMSELVES feared and hated through their own actions.  Should others rise up against their religion in the name of their own (as of old) and try to dominate them in the name of THEIR one true God?  Perhaps this would gain a grudging respect from Muslims and matters might calm down.
343695
it's sad how they succeed to destroy the image of this beautiful religion Islam. muslims are victims of this nasty game. and it's obvious from reading people comments such as (reward 12 virgins for the suicides) that they just know so much little. they didn't know that all Muslims scholars condemn theses terrorists activities but for some reason they don't receive any news about that here. Islam forbid killing Innocent people, Islam forbid killing your own self and Muhammad warned the Muslim world from being extremist and he said three times:\n "those who are extremist are going down"\n\nJesus talked about the comforter, and they claimed it's the holy spirit. comforter was refer to Muhammad the comming prophet who will complete the message of God and He is the last of all the prophets. \n\nand the Quran is a big evidence of the real God. but some will aruge about Islam without even discover Islam. what if Islam was true and Muhammad was a true prophet?
122444
When the artist Andres Serrano displayed "Piss Christ" (which depicts a small plastic crucifix submerged in a glass of the artist's urine) Christian's around the world didn't rise up and riot in the streets. They didn't kill anyone or call for the burning of embassies. The world didn't demand an apology from the artist....on the contrary, it was herald and given awards. Freedom of Speech groups rallied around and defended the piece.\n\nWhy are those groups not rising up now? The world is calling for an apology and it's simply ridiculous. I think that US News outlets should run the cartoons. Offensive or not, it's news.\n\nTo apologize and bow down to every little thing that irritates Muslims and terrorists alike is letting terrorism win. Don't get me wrong, I know that not all Muslims have a desire to "kill infidels." However, rioting in the streets, burning embassies and killing Europeans in the Middle East doesn't send a very good message to the rest of the world that they are a "religion of peace."
95651
From what I've read there is a book about Islam and author wanted to have some images in it but no one will accept to paint.\nThe newspaper held some kind of competition about who dares to draw a caricature of Mohammad and paublished the result.\nIt seems that they have heard somethings about the Islamic rules around drawing Mohammad pics.
881754
ALL I KNOW IS THAT MUSLIMS PROMOTE KILLINGS AND BE-HEADINGS !!!\nAND THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE BY ALL STANDARDS !!!
96600
The extremists feel that ANY DEPICTION OF MUHAMMAD is blasphemy.. The depiction of him with a bomb with a lit fuse is a GLARING ATTACK on the fundamentalist Islamic faith..\n-------------------\nBorn Muhammad ibn Abdullah, he is said to have initially been a merchant who traveled widely.\n\nMuhammad often retreated to the mountains outside Mecca, for prayer and contemplation. Muslims believe that in 610, at about the age of forty, while praying in one of these mountain caves called Hira, he was visited by the Angel Gabriel who commanded him to memorize and recite the verses sent by God. These verses were later collected as part of the Qur'an. Gabriel told him that God (Allah in Arabic) had chosen him as the last prophet to mankind. He eventually expanded his mission as a prophet, publicly preaching a strict monotheism and warning against a Day of Judgement where all humans shall be held responsible for their deeds. He did not completely reject Judaism and Christianity, two other monotheistic faiths known to the Arabs; rather he said that he had been sent by God in order to complete and perfect their teachings. Many in Mecca resented his preaching and persecuted him and his followers. Muslims believe that this was in part due to his followers' holding Muhammad's authority above that of their leaders. Eventually, persecution followed and in 622, he was forced to flee from Mecca (the Hijra) and settled in Yathrib (now known as Medina) with his followers, where he was the leader of the first avowedly Muslim community. War between factions in Mecca and Medina followed, in which Muhammad and his followers were eventually victorious. The military organization that was created by this struggle was then set to conquering the other tribes of Arabia. By the time of Muhammad's death, he had unified Arabia, spread Islam throughout the Arabian Peninsula, and launched expeditions to the north, towards Syria and Palestine.\n\nUnder Muhammad's immediate successors, the Islamic empire expanded into Palestine, Syria, Mesopotamia, Persia, Egypt, North Africa, and Iberia. Later conquests, commercial contact between Muslims and non-Muslims, and missionary activity spread Islam over much of the globe.\n\nAll Muslims feel a great love and veneration for Muhammad, and express this feeling in many ways.\n\nWhen speaking or writing, Muhammad's name is preceded by the title "Prophet" and is followed by the phrase, Peace be upon him, or Peace be upon him and his descendants by Shias; in English often abbreviated as "(pbuh)" and "pbuh&hd", or just simply as "p". \nConcerts of Muslim and especially Sufi devotional music include songs praising Muhammad (see Muslim music, Qawwali). \nSome Muslims celebrate the birthday of Muhammad (Mawlid) with elaborate festivities. Others do not, believing that such festivities are modern innovations. \nCriticism of Muhammad is often equated with blasphemy, which is punishable by death in some Muslim states. \nMuhammad is often refered to with titles of praise. \nMuhammad's relics, such as his grave, his sword, his clothing, even strands of his hair, are revered by some. \nEven non-iconic representations of Muhammad are traditionally discouraged. From the 16th century, however, Persian and Ottoman art frequently represented Muhammad in miniatures, albeit with his face either veiled, or emanating radiance (see e.g. Siyer-i Nebi). Modern caricatures of Muhammad have caused great controversy and criticism (see Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons for an example). \nBeyond the stories accepted as canonical by Islamic scholars of hadith, or oral traditions, there are many folktales praising Muhammad and recounting miraculous stories of his birth, upbringing and life.
179466
Those are just the extremists, I think.\n\nI'm a Moslem, but I disagree that converts should be killed.\nI say, let God be the judge of their actions, and let God punish them.
117233
The cartoons were not unfair, just silly, in poor taste, and wrong. What was unfair was implying that all Muslim’s are violent extremists and that their religion is based/founded on violence.\n\nIt is also unfair to imply that all Westerner's are anti-Muslim by attacking and destroying their property.\n\nIt is extremely unfair for a child to die using poor taste, silly cartoons as an excuse.
706342
I don't need to go to your link to answer that. The reason is that some Muslims will attack anything, or anyone, at anytime, for any reason.
683511
First of all, it's not all people and not all muslims and not all islam...\n\nThis is what everyone sees...\n\nMuslim and Palestinians people are the only ones who actually strap bombs on their bodies and blow up innocent people.  No other nationality or religion does that.
800699
When I read you question I laugh, a nauhgty muslim would always repent b4 their death that's what hard liner muslims do.