Was the theory of Quantum Aether dynamics Tested?
488405
i'm not sure, but i think that maxwell explained those exactly
632020
That we've found so far, anyway. The Michael Crichton book Timeline (not the movie, dear God not the movie) talks about light particle/waves as indicative of the existence of parallel universes. It's very interesting. Not only do they exhibit particle/wave behavior but no one can observe a photon where it is, only where it was. And sometimes it seems to have disappeared entirely only to reappear in a different place. Makes me wish I was smart enough to full grasp quantum physics.
12701
Quantum Physics would say "no". It was long supposed that once we got down to a certain level, everything would be predictable, but as you may already know, quantum physics doesn't tell us yes or no - it gives us several statistical maybes and such.
427178
yes, it has been tested with jets going around the earth and is confirmed often with the shuttle and other fast moving objects.\n\nwikipedia.org look up time dilation or special relativity.\n\nit also slows down the stronger the gravity field (gravity and acceleration are such that you can't do ANY test to determine whether one is affecting you or the other in a closed frame of reference, like an elevator)
994144
You mean quantum teleportation? I can point you to some layman's sites explaining how it works. . . Keep in mind, you are only teleporting the state of the "matter" (the experiments I am aware of only move photon states, though in principle you could apply them to electrons and protons), not the energy itself. Also, entangling macroscopic quantities of matter with some stream that could teleport its state (making a copy at the other end) is currently an intractable engineering problem.
484329
see this link\nhttp://www.colorado.edu/physics/2000/quantumzone/index.html
206005
The "aether" was thought to be a medium through which electromagnetic waves travel.  The idea was based on the notion that sound had to travel through something (solid, liquid, or gas) in order to be heard.  The existence of the aether has been disproven.
4816
Okay, so you know how quantum physics shows us that all points in space, all bits of matter are at any moment both a particle and a wave.  And Einstein's special theory of relativity shows us that all light is made of waves.  And these two theories combine in interesting ways, but don't completely gel.  For decades physicists have been struggling to reconcile the two theories, but they have been unable to do so effectively.  Something was always holding them back, basically because the universe seems to be holding more energy than there is space in the points of known mass.  This made scientists wonder where all the energy was.  And then they discovered, that the space in between the atoms was itself teeming with life.  And the life that lives at the bottom of all matter, inside the shell of the tiniest waves of photons, or quanta, is a strange world of simultaneously vibrating strings.  And those strings of multi-demensional vibrating pulsating energy play in a kind of metaphysical choir, creating all the intricacies of mass and energy in the universe, as if these tiny little strings were conductors conducting a vast symphony, only they were conducting that symphony with the conductors of all the other symphonies of the atoms they were orchestrating with.  And those collections of atoms and molecules and other interesting bits were actually being played by an army of conductors conducting simultaneously with an entire legion of instruments singing and strumming away.\n\nString theory is mind-bogglingly wild, because it's so advanced.  It took PBS three hours to explain it completely, and I was still lost.  Only when I completed the book about the show's research did I have a deeper grasp of it.  Basically you just need to know that these little strings that vibrate in 6, up to 10 dimensions (depending on whose theory applies to that particular "particle" - I told you, it's mind-blowing)  and how they vibrate impacts what manifests on the level of perceptible reality.\n\nWhat's so incredible about this is that science is finally catching up to philosophy.  The Middle Way, or what Huxley called the Perennial Philosophy, has always told us that the perception of life is merely the perception of imperceptible changes on a fundamental and/or spiritual nature, and the manifestation of those changes in the world that we see around us.  In many traditional cultures, those changes are manipulated by otherworldy figures, gods, angels and the like, which is outside the scope of scientists to discern, but in today's physics, the wall between the reality we see and the reality that is real is paper-thin.  Scientists are beginning to discover that everything truly is everything, and once they can prove it, life can get a whole lot more sane, because folks will have realized that what we are today is what we were twenty thousand years ago, we are one indescribable circle trailing itslef through time, perhaps even creating subtle vibrations that resonate with other vibrating universes that themselves are creating a reality in a world far, far different than this one, beyond all perceptible consciousness.  Perhaps, there may even be a heaven, in which all this is taking place and yet life is going on and on and on, without fear or violence or pain.\n\nEnjoy your continuing discovery of the details behind string theory.  It truly is a fascinating subject.
892821
The abstract study of dynamics is a world of mathematical\n   option coming of age.  Four come to mind that are interesting.\n   Chemistry the true relative quantum isotopic atomic servers.\n    Deregulation of the pollutants, actions never precedent.\n    Solid fuel for lite weight energy force distributions noncarbon.\n    Dynamics within resolutions response times unlimited space.\n    Any mentions of resolving an invention folder makes the act\n    of mathematics the candidate to be accurate in a blank palate.\n    Example one.  In the distress of giga junctions of raw create\n    the number of losses is proportional to the movements of the\n    disproportional active molecular redemanded.  1 equals 3\n    in hiv, rmz, other infections so why do the remaining have no\n    complements to adhere the tribute effectives. Showing that\n    they are the product dialing cross generic and solvency sweep\n    shoring 3.1 equals circumference times 1.2 the infective active\n    from non-directive suspended atomic molecular core solution.\n    Where 1.5 plus 2.5 are record all repairs or dominant genes\n     losing generic and upper gradients in moving within atomic \n     fields at 3.5 or 7.5 limits of pie.  To find data in this study is\n     open and immediate in pro-evolving positrons.
29352
If you measure the state of one of the entangled particles, you instantaneously set the state of the other particle (as far as we know, even if you are across the universe).  So, your answer is yes.\n\nNote that this is not a problem for relativity, because no information is being transmitted this way.  You can measure the state, but you can't control what it ends up being.
561193
You do have a point. Of course Schrodinger's equation was a brilliant breakthrough but these theories necessarily have a mathematical foundation and sometimes that foundation is not as secure as generally perceived. Mathematics is evolving and some of the stuff coming out is very weird, paradoxes and all, and this ends up affecting the way scientists formulate their theories. Put it this way: most physcists are not expert mathematicians and they are often a step behind with respect to rigor. As far as quantum mechanics is concerned, one has to consider its real and significant successes as a useful theory but with the realization that any developing theory  will necessarily have growing pains and it will need to be adjusted, finetuned and sometimes overhauled in the light of new info. in order to be incorporated in a more general theory of which it is a special case much like classical mechanics had to adjust to both quantum mechanics and the special and general theories of relativity. I think the greatest revision to quantum mechanics and General relativity will occur when the large and the small, and the uncertain and the deterministic, are finally 'married' in a breakthrough theory of quantum gravity. The problem with general relativity is that it is deterministic field theory and it is based on the concept of a space-time 'continuum'. I think the concept of continuum upon which the formalism of general relativity is based, is counter-productive and it needsto be replaced with a quantized 'granular' space-time structure that would allow things to get unified. On a philosophical note, you are right, in a sense, concerning questionable foundational definitions since if you keep asking the question: and what precisely do you mean by that? It doesn't take that many questions before you are reduced to axioms which are based on presumptuous perceptions of the human mind: In otherwords we could be missing a lot.
342951
You haven't kept up with the latest scientific\ndiscoveries.  Recently, well, in 1887, Albert\nMichelson and Edward Morley proved that no\nmedium (then called "ether" or "aether") was\nneeded for the propagation of electromagnetic\nradiation.
17379
The focus in the 21st century for the forefront of physics is understand the connection between General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. No question about this. The results could be a string theory, or loop gravity, or something completely different.\n\nAlso up there I think is a better understanding of a property we all know and love: mass. There is a search for the Higgs Boson. We need to find it and study it. Or, if it can't be observed try and determine what that means.\n\nOther challengs include being able to use the EPR phenomena of quantum entanglement to produce the first prototypes of an actual encrypted signal over a reasonable distance.\n\nNanotechnology is another challengs, in how to work those little parts into ways that form mini-computers, and also in ways that allow for various medical uses.
753404
Yes...thus far, it IS the simplest and best explanation of gravity...quantum mechanics doesn't explain gravity at all.  What is NOW needed is a theory of "everything" that can link relativity to QM so that they're BOTH compatible.
480443
I have not read the article but this sound it weird enought I thought I mention it.\n\n\nBurkhard Heim claimed it is possible to convert electromagnetic energy into gravitational and back again, and speculated that a rotating magnetic field could reduce the influence of gravity on a spacecraft enough for it to take off.
694010
If the laws of physics have the same forms in all frames of reference than the cause of interaction is confirmed.\nIn the case of this question there must have  been someone who caused  this fine question.\nOther wise it would have never existed.
1125359
I think the author of the article linked to in your referenced web page (it's the link below) explains it well. One of the many  fundamental constants, the Fine Structure Constant, may have changed very slightly -- or it may not have. The data acquired so far is not conclusive, especially as decided by the scientific establishment, which generally demands pretty overwhelming proof of such a radical idea. And as the author says, confirming evidence must be obtained not merely from more iterations of the same experiment, but from totally different kinds of experiment, and he adds that precision in these other experiment types is not yet high enough to be useful as a proof.