who is the real crimainal in iraq ?saddam or bush?
481068
Umm...Saddam did some really bad things during his reign as ruler of Iraq. Whether Bush is a criminal or not will be determined by history.
171519
SHARON for sure \nhe is a war criminal ... killing people and building walls arond them and stealling their land ETC...\nand in the end bush says about him that he is a peace maker !!!!
512106
i think its George W Bush at present time,.....he create chaos to a Afghanistan,Iraq,now Iran....GWB create havoc to this country and many countries were affected because of his imagination about terrorism....that does not exist...
245185
hands down - clinton.\n\nI believe Clinton actually did his job in service of the American people (even with the whole cigar thing). The international community loved him on top of it!\n\nWhile Bush on the other hand is in the service of his investors. Who can really say that Bush (1&2) were actually serving the people.\n\nWhen Clinton lied, nobody died.
1106049
Nobody deserves to die.\nThe difference between George W. Bush Jr. and Saddam is that Bush represents the majority of a people, while Saddam Hussein only represented himself.
1035336
hugo chavez\n\n-- he manages to drive bush crazy
133808
Saddam was the Baathist party leader in Iraq.  Most Sunni's are Baathist as well.  That is the connection between the two.  Saddam is by no means a religious man.  It was on rare occasion that he even wore Arab garb.  The Sunni's enjoyed most of the perks under his watch.  Most of the army was Sunni, yet most of the Republican Guard were from his home town. These are the people that he trusted the most; these were his most loyal followers, it had nothing to do with religion. His relationship with all other segments of Iraqi society was at best, guarded.  The Kurds would have had his ass in a New York minute, given half the chance.  The Turkman had no particular edge with Saddam, and the Christians just stayed out of his way. The Shiites, particularly those in the south, had strong ties to Iran.  Iran's brand of Islam is predominately Shiite, so Saddam was not particularly friendly to the Shiites.  Saddam ruled with scare tactics and he was pretty effective with them.  He kept every one under control but at a high price.  The mass graves still pop up occasionally!
1131933
In an effort to make it look as if he was actually accomplishing something after the 9/11 attacks.  If we all remember correctly it was not Saddam Hussein who was instrumental in those attacks, but rather Osama bin Laden.  here we are 4.5 years into this and still no bin Laden.  All the emphasis is on Iraq.  When did Iraq came into this picture?  It's the classic bait and switch tactic used by so many con men prior to Bush.
1125954
IT IS LIKE CHOOSING BETWEEN EVIL AND EVIL..\n\nboth have excelled as criminals and are actually muderers responsible for the death of uncountable innocent people..\n\nbut yes george bush is better because he doesn't believe that other religions are religions of kafirs and that shariyat should be established..  \natleast his jehad has a motive (oil...oil...oil in iraq)\nosama's doesn't make sense..
348121
haha "the Clinton days were better!!!"  hahahah\nI guess the pres gettin some action is seen as more positive than a war.  Anyway, I want to know who Pres Bush has peronally killed or given orders to kill... anybody? *crickets*  Yeah that's right, that's what I thought.  On the other hand Saddam gave orders for thousands and thousands to be killed (ok allegedly, friggin PC nazis).  \nso to answer the question, the aspect I hate is blind ignorant bashings that are fueled by Kool Aid drinkers and the  liberal mass media, who will not admit that THEY are the mass media and the real sheep here.
652903
BUSH WILL WIN COZ SADDAM IS HUNGRY FROM SO MANY DAYS
17340
don't know who this Sadam is so I will have to go with Bush
476878
Yes I did.  Did you know that Osama was responsible for 9/11 and not Saddam?  Did you know that Bush has failed to bring Osama to justice?\n\nBush is the Commander-In-Chief of the military.  Therefore Bush is directly responsible for the failure to bring Osama to justice.
32683
Define good and evil in this world. Saddam is an evil man. There are men at large right now who are guilty of similar atrocities and are in our own country.\n\nUnfortunately, some of our people consider them heroes.\n\nLook deep inside of yourself and try to tell me who is actually right in this world. It is a sad and scary state of affairs.
601640
Gee....could it have been Saddam Hussein?  He did kill hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians and openly threaten both the United States and Israel.  How can you blame George Bush for starting the war?  I mean, can you blame the cop for arresting a murderer?  Nope, you blame the murderer!
844468
George W. Bush is a war criminal, a mass murderer and a barefaced liar. He can't be charged since he is still in power. "Diplomatic Immunity".  Because he lied, our troops died. Because of his arrogance and his favoritism between Shiites and Sunnis, a civil war occurred in Iraq and death among innocent people multiplied. So who is responsible for all this fiasco and death in Iraq? Bush and his Evil Team are responsible.
643817
Bush.\nWarmongering corrupt ineptitude on one hand. No intellectual curriosity. Lying to justify an unnecessary invasion and even his own party hates him.  Everything he touches turns to trash.