what is the bilateral symmetry of a jaguar?
491376
I would call it anterior to posterior/dorsal to ventral bilateral symmmetry - that is, if you drew a line through the animal from the front to back connecting its top and bottom, the resulting halves would be symmetrical.  However, I don't know if there are really specific types of bilateral symmetry - usually things are defined as asymmetrical, bilaterally symmetrical, or radially symmmetrical.
804222
Humans are symmetrical organisms. Cranial nerves are paired to provide innervation for the left and right.
245368
Most animals, including humans, are bilaterally symmetrical. This means \nthat the right and left sides are mirror images of one another. Thus both \nsides develop somewhat independently of each other. Having said that I have \nto emphasize the word "somewhat," since there is a great deal of \ninterrelationship, interaction, and communication between the two sides \nfor normal development to occur. Thus, as the face develops, two nasal \nplacodes (thickenings of the frontal process) develop. These begin to \nsubmerge and as they do, each placode results in the formation of a nasal \nchamber, and the region surrounding each placode forms a horseshoe-shaped \nthickening, known as  the nasal process. Each nasal process is subdivided \ninto a lateral and a medial nasal process, which partially surround the \nopening into nasal chamber. Since it is a horseshoe-shaped structure, it \nwill require a closure at its open end and that closure results from the \nfusion of the lateral and medial nasal processes with the developing \nmaxillary process.\n\nI hope this helps.
522916
Based on the term alone, I would say it is a tumor (not necessarily cancerous), or some other growth on both adrenal glands.  Bilateral = both sides, adrenal = glands on top of kidneys.  If it is appearing on BOTH kidneys, it seems paradoxical to what you would typically see in cancer.  I'm curious to know for certain what it is, though.
914899
Mistress is right.\n\nwhen we look at quadrupeds, what we see is very confusing, because the length ratios between the different parts of the bones are much different from ours.  for instance, if you look at a dog's hind leg, it would appear that it's knee bends backwards, but what you are really looking at is it's ankle: dog's femurs are much shorter than ours, so they almost "hide" in their fur.\n\nThe same is true with the front legs of other quadrupeds.  Look at this picture of a deer: http://www.exzooberance.com/virtual%20zoo/they%20walk/deer/White-Tailed%20Deer%20104024.jpg\n\nAt first, one would think that the deer is sticking it's front leg knee out the furthest, but if you look at it's bone structure, you will find that what appears to be his knee is much more like a wrist (with the hoof being the "fingers" and the bend closest to the deers body being the "elbow")\n\nElephant front legs (http://www.elephant-village-pattaya.com/images/Elephant.jpg) \nin comparison to deer front legs, look remarkably like a human's (as side from the giant foot and grey wrinkly skin and ... well you know.).  Elephants (and rhino's too I believe) are the only quadrupeds that truly have 4 "knees" when comparing their anatomy to a Human's anatomy.
675710
radial symmetry\n\n  • noun chiefly Biology symmetry about a central axis, as in a starfish.
1177938
The shape and symmetry of the dimples is central to a ball's flight characteristics.
820767
There is no real way of telling them apart, they are what you call sexually monomorphic and monochromatic, meaning they have no physical difference or difference in color. The females are slightly larger than the males, but you would only really be able to tell them apart if you had both in your hands. Under a microscope with some entomological knowlegde, you would be able to see the genetalia, but with the naked eye, it is quite difficult.\nThe best way to tell would be to find a pair in copulation, the one on the bottom is the female and the one on the top is the male. Seeing this will also give you an idea of the size of a female compared to the male....but thats about all....\n\nHope this helps!
863940
The basic answer is that symmetry is efficient from the point of view of growth of a multicellular creature.  The same DNA plan to construct the left side can also construct the right side.\n\nThe bigger question is why are we symmetrical from left to right, but *asymmetrical* from front to back?  (Dawkins covers this.)\n\nThe answer goes all the way back to an early stage in evolution where, basically, worms  were the dominant body plan.  \n\nThere are advantages to creating a separate opening for eating and excreting ... namely, it reduces the chance that the worm will reingest something it has just excreted.  So one end becomes the "front" end, for eating, and the other end the "rear" end for excreting.  As sense organs are far more useful for eating, they would tend to develop near the front end.  This in turn would cause nervous-system organs for processing sense information to be near the senses (the brain also goes to the front).  And all appendages that develop for locomotion, would develop to propel the organism forwards (towards the "front"), which is why tails (originally used for swimming) develop in the "rear" end, fins and legs are structured to push backwards.  And so on.\n\nHowever, while there is an advantage for front-rear asymmetry, there is no significant advantage to left-right asymmetry.  We don't find food more often on the right than on the left.  Predators don't attack more often from the right than from the left.  So it is advantageous to have sense organs arranged to look both left and right (two eyes two ears), and limbs arranged to move us both left and right (left limbs, right limbs).   So left-right symmetry has stayed.\n\nSo basically, we are bilaterally symmetrical, because almost all animals (except for things like starfish), had a common ancestor with a 'wormlike' body plan.\n.
346824
bilateral symetry disorder?? heck i dunno. but u can try out this test..
876025
A crease and two sides... :)\n\nSeriously, in zoology, I think you are alluding to a fold of sheep (aka flock of sheep).
625330
Yes. It's a biologic tendency and does indeed run in families! ALL animals favor one over the other. Infact, Polar Bears are usually left-pawed.
760332
we are basically asymmetrical...symmetry is nature's way of showing perfection...so the less asymmetrical we are the more attractive we are\n\nbut to the point: the side which is dominant is usually larger than the other because we tend to use the muscles there more, so that makes us look asymmetrical physically
849273
is symmetric if the figures are the same!
658011
This is as close as I could get.  Good luck!\n\nshe is very beautiful that so pretty color that it has, ciuda much its body.
669147
number of sides, congurency?, size of angles, distinguishing characteristics
537973
Cat pupils close from the sides to centre in a vertical line... \nHuman pupils stretch and opens in a circle...