What are these 360 degrees? and why are these 360 in count? R these related 2 a human life, some how?
486840
The reason why 360 is such a "popular" number is because it is easily divisible by all numbers from 1-10 (with the exception of 7). If we wanted to divide a circle into a certain number of parts equally & have a convenient measure, we need an original big measure which can be easily divided and the parts can be measured easily as well - 360 is suitable for this purpose.
866702
180 degrees =  pi  radians\n\n305 degrees\n=  (305/180)  *   pi\n=  (61/36) pi
3096
If your question is - why is the angle around a point 360 degrees, then the answer is that a point by itself has no specific starting or ending point and hence the whole 360 degrees is the angle around a point in space in 2D
29453
This all dates back to the Ancient Babylonians who liked to count in base 60. Ratios of 6, 12, 60, and 360 were seen by them as being 'round' numbers in the same way that we use base 10 and see 5, 10, 100 etc as useful numbers to divide things up into. \n\nSee: http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/ HistTopics/Babylonian_and_Egyptian.html \n\nThe Babylonians divided the sky into the 12 signs of the Zodiac, and a circle into 360 degrees. They divided the day and night each into 12 hours (although in many time systems the lengths of these varied between summer and winter! Babylon was rather nearer the equator than Liverpool, so they didn't get too confused with this). The hour was split into 60 minutes and a minute into 60 seconds. \n\nAll these numbers have survived for 4000 years, despite the fact that we have changed our numbering system to base 10! In England, when I was young, we still measured with feet, each divided into 12 inches. The Americans still do! [By the way, do you know where the mile comes from? It's Roman, not Babylonian!] \n\nThe year is nearly 360 days long and the Babylonians split it into 12 months. Other civilizations based their calendar on the moon and had 13 months. We still have problems with this today because Easter is based on the lunar calendar and migrates around the Julian calendar in a complex way. Chinese new year is still based on the Lunar calendar
697797
If θ is a reflex angle then \n\n180° < θ < 360°\n\nAngles are categorised as follows\n\n0° < θ < 90° ------- acute angle\n90° = θ  ------------ right angle\n90° < θ < 180° --- obtuse angle\n180° = θ ----------- straight angle\n180° < θ < 360° -- reflex angle\n360° = θ ----------- revolution
610173
Radians are based on pi.  A radian is equivalent to 1/(2pi).  Because it is just a ratio of another constant, it isn't based on a physical standard unlike feet, meters, etc.\n\nIt's just like degrees.  A degree is 1/360th of a complete circle, but nobody needs to define 360 with a physical object.  We all know what 360 is.  Similarly we know what 2pi is (it's the circumference of a unit circle).
801229
90° < beta < 180° means 2nd quadrant.\nsin beta = 12/13 \nbeta=arcsine(12/13)=67.38° in the 1st quadrant\nor 180°-67.38°=112.62° in the 2nd.\n\ntan beta = 3/4 , sin beta < 0\nsin beta<0 means 3rd or 4th quadrant.\ntan beta>0 means 1st or 3rs quadrant so we are in the 3rd quadrant.\nbeta=arctan 3/4=36.87° in the 1st quadrant. or\n36.87°+180°=216.87° in the 3rd.
846895
11 true; 12 angular; 13 true; 16 parallel; 19 nonzero; 21 b; 22 d.\nYou're welcome, but you really should study enough to understand the ideas of rotation, translation and energy. If they don't matter now, they may be quite important later.
950847
the base angles are equal therfore each is (180-25deg17')/2\nso each is 155deg43'/2   which is 77deg51.5' which as a decimal is  is 77.8583degrees\n\nNOW circular measure is The measure of an angle in radians.\nThere are 2*Pi radians in 360deg therefore\n1deg = PI/180 rads\ntherefore\n77.8583degrees= 77.8583 times Pi/180 rads\n\ntake Pi as 3.142 and a calculator gives 1.359 rads
268937
No. There are 360 degrees in a circle.
260231
360-260 = 100 degrees\n\n\nOOPS\n============================\nI read it wrong -- I read it "difference" instead of "refence". "Difference angle" didn't make much sense either -- but then i thought people ask questions wrong too".\nSorry about that and .....  YES, jangboyz IS CORRECT.
1105920
They add up to 360 degrees. (If you walked around the quadrilateral you would end up facing the same way as when you started, hence you went through 360 degrees. For a re-entrant or crossed-over quadrilateral, make that 360k degrees)
74833
Skew angle is an angle >180 but < 360\nFor any angle there is a skew angle in reverse side.\nFor example in other side of 120 degree, there is a 240 degree skew angle.
205070
360 degrees = 2 pi radians\nimplies \n180 degrees = pi radians\n180 degrees/pi radians = 1 (Or) pi radians/180 degrees = 1\n\nTo convert radians to degrees multiply the given data in radians with 1 which will not alter its value.\nNext replace 1 with the expression having radians in the denominator and simplify the expression.  \n\n4 radians \n = 4pi radians x 1\n = 4pi radians x (180 degrees/pi radians)\n = 4 x 180 degrees\n = 720 degrees\n\n\nhttp://www.schoolingkids.com/\nhttp://www.futureaccountant.com/
290208
360 is the number of degrees in a circle. Basically, it means that people can see you from many different sides. Actually, I was surprised to see the term used in Yahoo! although it is common in other settings. In the business world, for instance, there is a 360 degrees review where your supervisor and coworkers rate your performance. Again, it means that you are rated by people who see you in many different ways.
928324
30 Degrees! There are 360 degrees in the clock made up of 12 hours. Each hour would then be 30 degrees! 30X12=360
106316
The Cartesian coordinates based on two axes X and Y\nAny point is reprensented(expressed) by a certain horizontal distance (X) and certain vertical distance (Y) form an fixed origin having (0,0) coordinates as reference point >>>> this produce a unique representation for each point\n\nThe Polar coordinates based on the raduis R and the angle theta \nAny point is represented by a distance (r) taken in a certain angle theta from the reference point (origin)\nSince that angle repeated every 360 degree=2pi\n(eg 1=361=721 in degrees) so each representation represents an infinte of points {eg (5,1)=(5,1+360*k) where k =any integer} so the reprensentation is not unique in polar coordinates\n\nthe proove .. the origin (0,0) could be (0,any theta) since the raduis is zero the angle is not important so the origin point could have any angle