Who is the 3rd anti-christ??????!!!!!?
491815
3rd???   was there a 2nd???
447756
What? Jesus never said lets leave Judah. What? all the prophets say Israel will "win" in the last days. What> jesus said you wont see me again untill the last days as he assended . What? yet he appeared to Paul on the road to Damascus (the very man that hates jesuses followers)and gives him a plan to bring jesus to the heathens .    Jesus revealed many things to his disiples he never said this man would come along and set the way the new formed congregations (or there even should be congregations) conduct there buisiness. Once established, being set aside from judah, being involved in war and oppression ever since and Judah has been the victim many times ,but now Israel is home Christianity will be used to defend Judah and its rights till the final day. What an interesting arena   this human game is being played out in. I wish I was around to see the Dinosaur game being played! All 66 books are important, probably even more! (ps  ------  try to establish who wrote the scripts for the opposing players oh if you believe somthing  you just end up trying to prove what you belive and will have trouble really seeing the facts)  love to all
1118463
really? that's hilarious. satan's got his eye on you...or is it the antichrist? or is it that freaky kid damian who IS  the antichrist? or is it just nero? no matter what, that's an impressive eye on you.
1149403
The anti-Christ will NEVER call himself a Christian, not will he claim Jesus Christ as his Saviour. President Bush does. \n\nThe anti-Christ does everything opposite of Jesus Christ and seeks to destroy all those that love the Him. President Bush supports Christianity and loves the true Christ.\n\nMy advice to you is to study the Bible, watch the History channel, and read up on your president. Then you would not ask this type  of question and reveal your lack of knowledge in both of these areas.
1104519
(I'm pasting a question I posted today to answer your question)\n\nCorrect me if I'm wrong but isn't the anti-christ suppose to come to earth under the disguise of being a Christian? Then he becomes a world leader using his faith right? And then the story goes that all who follow him etc... those who don't are saved....\n\nIs that right?\n\nBecause if it is, I'm pretty upset after watching pbs.org Frontline story "The Jesus Factor" http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/...\n\nIt's a documentary of Bush and his path to religion. In 1988, he was hired by Bush Sr. to find out how to appeal to the evangelical voters. He reported back stating they were a huge populance and he is actually quoted as stating in 2000, "you can win the presidency with their vote ALONE."\n\nIf you watch the entire show, you see how he studied this early and then set out to use his faith to become president.\n\nNow, tell me pls, does this not describe what is prophesied as as what the anti-christ will do by then gaining world power?
242308
"NICKNAME", who are you?  That is really wrong!  Crosses are not pagan in the least!  They are not idols, they are ways of remembering the amazing thing that Christ did for us.  And Christ DID die on a cross.  Where'd you come up with stake from?  Read your Bible and do your research!  Goodness!  I've never heard such a thing before as "Jesus died on a stake"!  That's rubbish.  I'm sorry if I sound rude, I'm just in a stressful mood.  But I mean what I say.  If anyone wants to talk to me about Christianity, feel free.  My email is earthtoblondes@yahoo.com  Give me an email if you have any questions/comments!  I hope to help everyone I know to become a Christian, and I'd like to help you too!
839092
It's so interesting that you happened to ask this question right now because I just happened to read a very informative article on this very subject.  Here are some excerpts:\n\n"The list of those charged with being the antichrist is a long one.  In the past, those labeled 'antichrist' included Jews, the Catholic papacy, and Roman emporers...The Apostle John is the only Bible writer to use the word 'antichrist.'  In two of the letters bearing his name, the word appears five times, in both the singular and the plural.  The verses in which the word appears" are as follows:\n\n1 John 2:18; 1 John 2:22; 1 John 4:3; 2 John 7\n\n"From these verses, we can see that the antichrist is a liar and a deceiver, bent on destroying a person's relationship with Christ and with God.  Accordingly, the apostle urged his fellow Christians: 'Beloved ones, do not believe every inspired expression, but test the inspired expressions to see whether they originate with God, because many false prophets have gone forth into the world.' (1 John 4:1)\n\nJesus too warned against deceivers, or false prophets, saying, 'They come to you in sheep's covering, but inside they are ravenous wolves.  By their fruits [or, works] you will recognize them.' (Matthew 7:15, 16)\n\n...'Antichrist'  means 'against (or instead of) Christ.'  So in its broadest sense, the term refers to all who oppose or lyingly claim to be the Christ or his representatives.  Jesus himself said: 'He that is not on my side is against me [or is antichrist], and he that does not gather with me scatters.' - Luke 11:23\n\n...Because Jesus' disciples are persecuted 'on account of his [Jesus'] name,' the persecutors are clearly antichrist, against Christ.  The 'false prophets,' some of whom were once Christians, are also in that category. (2 John 7)  These 'many antichrists,' wrote John, 'went out from us, but they were not of our sort; for if they had been of our sort, they would have remained with us.' - 1 John 2:18, 19\n\nThe words of both Jesus and John plainly indicated that the antichrist is not a single person but is made up of many individual antichrists.  Moreover, because they are false prophets, one of their main objectives is religious deception.  What are some of their devices?"\n\nThe articles goes on and additional subheadings read, "Spreading Religious Lies," "Antichrists Reject God's Kingdom," "The Antichrist 'Tickles Ears,'" and "Test the Inspired Expressions."\n\nIf you would like to read the whole article, you can email me and I'll send it to you.  I'm sure you'd find it very interesting and informative.\n\nI wish you well!
332305
Huh? Who is Jesus? Do you mean that jewish rabbi Jeshu that the greek christians renamed Jesus and claimed him as their God in the flesh? Didn't he already come back once? How many lives does that guy get any way? The last event would probably be "WORLD-WIDE PANIC"
707252
I found this ,it may answer some of your questions.(these or not my writings)\n\nA would-be historian and wannabe scholar by the name of Hugh Schonfield who did a book titled something like, “In Search of Historic Jesus.” It didn’t take long to realize that this man was out to prove that the divine Jesus, the Son of God, didn’t exist, and that he – Schonfield – had an anti-God, anti-Faith agenda behind his writings. He made the outrageous supposition that “the early Church fathers may have rewritten some of the New Testament books and influenced others to rewrite the story of Jesus” despite a total absence of any historical or documentary proof to support such a thesis.\n\nAnother wannabe historian, Gary R. Habermas, took it even a step father with his claim that “the Gospels represent the teachings of the early church and not those of Jesus himself.” These kinds of spurious claims are johnny-come-lately efforts of liberals and leftists who neither know, nor have a relationship with Jesus Christ, nor have they ever even made an effort to personally put Jesus’ claims to the test.\n\nThat said, let’s examine some of the historical evidence that does exist. \n\nMany years ago, my father made reference to a volume of historical documents he had looked at when he was studying in Bible College. He later obtained a copy and sent it to me. The book was titled, The Archko Volume, and represented the culmination of many years of effort of two eminent scholars, Drs. McIntosh and Twyman of the Antiquarian Lodge in Genoa, Italy. Published in 1887, the work provided copies of writings and works taken from the Talmud and the Sanhedrin contemporary to the time of Christ, along with a copy of “Acta Pilati,” which was a report sent by Pontius Pilate – the Roman procurator or governor of Judaea – to Caesar detailing the arrest, trial and crucifixion of Jesus. Some of the other documents included Gamaliel’s interview with Joseph and Mary concerning Jesus. Gamaliel, you may remember, was the Pharisee at whose feet Paul the apostle sat while he was yet a Pharisee, being instructed in the ways of the sect.\n\nThe Archko Volume also includes some documented reports of Caiaphas, the High Priest who presided over the Jewish trial and judgment of Jesus prior to His being brought before Pilate, as well as his report to the Sanhedrin concerning the resurrection of Jesus.\n\nAccording to the testimony of the two researchers and archeologists who came up with the documents, the sources of these documents were ancient libraries in Constantinople and the Senatorial Docket in Rome.\n\nWhen you read these documents, it provides an interesting perspective and an otherwise not-considered view of others who either participated in or observed events and people who were involved in some way with Jesus Christ.\n\nOne of the things often overlooked by those who seek to authenticate the historical Jesus is the fact that what we now refer to as the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) were written as personal testimonies of men who walked and talked with Jesus. These were eyewitness accounts. What makes them all the more intriguing is the fact that they were written at different times, in different places, and in three different languages (Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic), and yet they agree with each other. Each of the writers has a distinct personality and a perspective that differs from the others; and that personality comes through in the writing style. Nevertheless, there is synoptic agreement between Matthew, Mark and Luke. \n\nJohn writes from a totally different perspective as Jesus’ best friend, and the majority of what he writes details the final week of Jesus’ life and what He taught before He was crucified.\n\nBut, let’s step away from the accepted canon for a moment and look at the works of historians who were contemporary to the time.\n\nPhilo Judaeus of Alexandria, Egypt was a contemporary of both Jesus and the apostle
211045
The name above every other name is Jesus Christ.Is this what you are referring to?What do you mean "who wrote it?"
342387
The Anti Christ is a world leader who will rise in the last days after the church is removed from the Earth by Jesus in the rapture before the tribulation begins. As far as who he is (his name) we don't know. But I can tell you several things about him. One he will be a world leader that will arise out of europe. He will broker a 7 year peace agreement between Israel and the Arab world. He will allow Israel to rebuild their temple. He will be hailed as a hero by many. Someone will try to kill him but he will survive the attack. He will be possesed by satan. Half way through the 7 years he will declare himself to be God and will try to force the world to worship him. He will do this in the rebuilt Jewish temple. Those who accept him will have to receive a mark on their hands or foreheads in order ot buy or sell any kind of product. Those who reject him will be killed for doing so. He will greatly persecute the Jews and Christians after he declares himself to be God. When Jesus returns at the end of the tribulation he will be exposed as false and satan will be removed from the man and bound for a thousand years. After he (satan) is released satan will lead one final rebellion against God and then be completely defeated and sent into the lake of fire where he will suffer eternally with all who reject Jesus. The good news is if a person accepts Jesus as their Lord and Savior believing He died on the cross for our sins and rose from the grave. Then they will be forgiven and saved and will not be here to see the anti Christ or any of the atrocities he will commit.
737416
Better take him seriously.  He probably plans to be the anti-christ.in his next incarnation.
295795
Every now and again some version of Christianity accuses someone of being the Anti-Christ.  Usually it is someone who stands in their way or causes them grief.  Everyone likes to blame the horrors of the world on someone.  Based on their track record I doubt they'll ever get it right and the real anti-christ has probably had a long fruitfull life and is now retired somehwere where they serve cocktails on the beach.
149997
Yay!  I love your post!  It's true, nobody has EVER (get it?!), nor ever will come close to doing the things He did.  Oh sure, there have been good people, but were ANY of them perfect?  NO!!!  I forget what the statistic is, but I think it's really cool how the chances of someone fulfilling all of the OT prophecies that Jesus did are only one in a few million!  Jesus is alive and well, and will be coming back to reclaim this corrupted, old world for His own once again!  Oh, to imagine that day!
572755
I dont think the antichrist is alive yet. But, do you think he might be born on June 6th? You know, the whole 666 thing? That would be kind of cool. If that's true then we have only 20 to 40 years left! Oh God!\n\nJust kidding. Who cares who the antichrist is? By the time we know we are all gonna be dead, so dont worry about it.
638869
Delightfull!Teasing the "believers" is such a pleasant diversion. I see they are the only ones answering your question, so permit me to offer a change of pace.Lets see now,could it be the christian god?Perhaps allah?The jewish one? I give up,surely such a barbarous,murderous misanthrope would not be considered a god?No?
454072
Joshua.  People like you crack me up.  Really!  You argue about biblical-specific entries and events as if they were factual and undeniable.  "written 4000 years ago"  On what?  Notebook paper?  Do you have some copies of those 4000 year old writings?  Do you have some secret text that nobody else has ever seen?  Are you on heroin or acid?  What's your trip?  None of the authors of the NT witnessed the alleged resurrection.  No matter how you stretch it, there are no actual accounts of it.  Most of the NT was created and written in 320AD under the direction of Constantine the Great, and its puirpose was NOT for historic accuracy.  Its purpose was to create a doctrine at the Council of Nicea that all factions of religious doctrine could agree upon and pull everyone together.  Why does it appear that there only a few people that post here regularly who actually know this?  Is your only source of "history" the Bible itself?  Are you crazy enough to use the Bible to prove the Bible?  Talk about illogic!\n\nThe original poster is correct -- if the notion of god portrayed in the bible is accurate, then there is no need for "free will" -- God already knows how things turn out.  He already knows who chooses free will and who doesn't choose free will, how they act, and who the sinners are and who goes to hell.  He already knows the choices people made in the past and what they'll make in the future.  He already knows how things will turn.  Already been there.  Outside of the time line?  Fine, state it however you wish.  It's still the same.  He's all knowing.  He knows how the "souls" will turn out. There's no need for a test on earth.\n\nThe question is not flawed at all.  Your assumption that the Bible is incontrovertible is flawed, and your statements of biblical myths as assertion are ridiculous.  It is one of hundreds of unprovable myths on this whole planet, full of fatal flaws, like the one this question raises.