Why do men ask the most biased questions.?
488411
1. Men are biased and ask stupid questions to see if they can.\n2. Women are moody. That is because they have learned that the world will cater to them.\n3. Sex is supposed to last more than 20 seconds. Try it and see if your girlfriend gets friendlier.
342317
the person like u ask such questions to make other people to make points.\n\ntks
696157
Women have the impression that guys are jerks and thats why they cannot trust any guy. Maybe it's because they have had bad experiences with guys. Not all guys are bad but you even know that guys think with the wrong head
661348
heres one: "why r men so lazy and retarded?"
340851
Only some men do this, and they probably do it for exactly the same reason that some women sulk when you dont give the correct answer to them.\n\nSome people react childishly.
124203
It's probably because they are simular to you, are curious about the same questions, or think they have the answers since they are all in the same thought pattern.. I don't think any ONE person is anwering everything,... that would be impossible.
390467
Coz men are men. It doesn't matters whether they're dense or not. All is different, each is unique. No offense, but perhaps you should ask why are you stereotyping.
550714
based on my own sampling I have noticed that people giving articulate, intelligent answers to questions asked gravitate towards the left in their views and the ones leaving simple sloganistic responses that in no way come close to answering questions seem to have a \n"rightie" bias.  \n\nAn unscientific sampling to be sure.
284646
when guys asks alot of questions like who's is it, say my name etc. that is really dumb we want to feel good while in the moment  not to answer all those damn questions to a quiz!!!!
277438
Same reason you guys ask sex questions.  Shows who is intellectual.
1036519
I pick the most thought provoking. I will often ignore the ones that are just parroting what I have said. Someone must bring in a different tilt on the subject, something I missed, or explain things well for me to give them the 10 points.
901136
I think most of the time the ones looking negatively at these men are women who want to have children or already do have children so they are already biased in their opinion.  But these people also tend to think that women who do not want children are selfish or something along those lines.
1097452
Aww... That's so sweet :)\n\nThe reason why we ask our own questions in the Men's Health Section of this great site is one major reason: Men are natural problem solvers and they know answers to everything that Women are curious about no matter what it is!\n\nWhenever I ask my Husband to help me out with my own problem no matter how big or small it is, he's always able to come up with the BEST solution ever :)\n\nIt's so wonderful knowing how tallented Men are even though sometimes they try their best and pretend like they don't know the answers to any problem :)
1109242
It's easy to give an opinion but hard to listen to another especially if it's not the same as yours.\n\nI for one invite opposing views life's more interesting that way.\n\nWould rather hear what you really believe than being surrounded by yes men.
51511
I  sense some hostility with the answers so far so ill be very careful. if u just met than there is a cardinal rule never call in the first 4-5 days so that they dont think ur all over them or desperate. if thats not the case than he either has a good reason like in the hospital or just lied it happens not only men do this though and i hope that the other ladies who read this will acknowledge that. women are just as bad as men if not worse because their better at it.
1034243
Because most men do lie!
536670
Maybe apathy.  Maybe defensiveness.  Maybe too many questions.\n\nI tried to answer some guy's question the other day and he got upset that I didn't answer yes or no.\n\nWell, his initial question was not a yes or no question and there were at least 3 questions he was asking at once.  If you ask too many questions, people are generally going to pick either the first or the last thing you said.\n\n(Case in point, read my question here:  http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AlYHfr9enEYxTaAQOGFw.9_sy6IX?qid=1006051030349 and then read some of my answers.  It is a highly specific question.  I think I have asked it in a logical progression.  But it's too much information.  People either didn't read all the way to the bottom or it's just more work than they want to put into an answer.  At least two of them gave me the exact answer I asked them to avoid.  It's too many questions.)\n\nIn his case, I actually did address the two questions at the end of his litany.  But it seemed silly to me to answer those first when they were asked last.  Sometimes the question isn't that great.\n\nAs for answering based on opinion or agenda, we only know first hand what our experiences are and what our interpretations are.  I don't know if we are fully capable of answering anything in a completely unbiased way.  Do people go too far and become unwilling to see anyone else's side?  Sure.  But if they perceive the question as "where do you stand?" of course they're going to tell you.  Or if someone asserts their way is the only way, someone is going to feel compelled to point out all the other ways. \n\nSometimes the questions are not questions at all.  Loaded questions are generally statements with a question mark tacked on at the end.  People who ask them, don't really want to know, but people feel compelled to answer them anyway, because they are generally based on what one group  considers to be untrue.\n\nThe higher the stakes or the contention, the more divided people become.  And this is the division as far as I can see:\n\nAtheist's statement:  "you are stupid if you believe in mythology and any belief in God or anyone higher than ourselves is the equivalent of belief in the Easter bunny," or "Christians are too ignorant to understand science and if they were just smarter, they would see that there is no need for God."\n\nChristians' statement:  "your life would be better if you accepted Jesus as your Savior", or "if you don't see the error of your ways, you are going to hell."\n\nI've not been paying enough attention to the other views (agnostics, pagans, wiccans, Jews, Muslims, etc) to voice their "side."  But you get the idea.\n\nI think part of the problem between Theists and atheists is that if science is wielded by the party who is trying to overthrow God, science necessarily cannot be neutral ground.  Theology is not neutral ground.  \n\nI'm not saying that science is the enemy, but it can't answer everything.  Since it is used by atheists to discredit God, it cannot be considered neutral.\n\nSo were do we meet to talk things out?  What could we decide is neutral?