I am looking for the best printer which prints pictures. I want to be able to print a great 8x10 from my PC.?
488377
Try a printer store :)))
619328
Try the "Print as Image" option in the print dialog.  It's slower than the default, but it might work for you.\n\nAlso, make sure you have the latest drivers for your printer and operating system.
760103
check the site posters,com they have posters and photos 8x10
1018065
Seems like you can't do it on that printer, I have the same experience too. The new HP printer (after DJ 900 series) feed the paper very quick, while the DJ 900 Series feed the paper slowly, which, can affect the starting point, since they don't have any sensor for the paper feed.\nTry using adobe pagemaker and make your desing slightly bigger than actual print. Hope this help.
145629
Can you open it up with MS Paint, which comes with Windows?\nIf not, how about Windows Picture Viewer.  When you are viewing that, do a print screen, then paste it into MS Paint.\n\nIn MS paint, can you try to resize it so it prints on 6 pages.  Go to Image, Stretch/Skew.  Type in a number for height and width, for example 50% to halve the picture.
598978
I use an ink jet printer on a daily basis and i just use ordinary photocopier paper.\n\nMost photocopy paper is universal now and works well with most machines.\n\nJust use a specialised paper when you want something to look high quality.\n\nOrdinary paper wont damage your machine
880183
Find out what type of connection the printer takes and what time of connection the PC takes and find a converter. They have plenty of them on the market. If i know what two types of connections you are talking about i could link you up. But i hope this leads you in the right direction\nCheers
797822
Ok, first of all, unless you are buying a laser printer that can handle input from DOS and uses an internal font, then the computer is sending VASTLY more than a few K to print even a simple letter.\n\nThe reason is that the image is sent over as (for example) a 600 x 600 dpi bitmap.  If you are printing a full page, it can be in the megabytes in theory.\n\nI do agree though, that the computer will handle this effortlessly.\n\nAs for whether this is a feature or not, it is a way to make the printer cheaper - like video cards that use the computers memory - if you are after a REALLY cheap printer, this might fit the bill nicely.\n\nDo bear in mind though, that COLOUR lasers can be found for under £200 / $400 if you shop around. It may be out of your price range, but if if "close", perhaps something to conisder....
1004934
If you don't plan on using it a whole bunch, you might consider the HP 5440. It costs about $70 and the black and color cartridge can be bought together in a pack for $30. \n\nIf you do quite a bit of printing take a look at the HP 5940 ($100) as it's built a little heftier and also comes with cartridges that last longer but cost a little more.\n\nThe HP 6980 is another good choice since it comes with wireless networking and costs about $150. It also has cartridges that last longer.\n\nHP printers are the best selling printers by far in the United States and PC Magazine's readers have voted them the best 14 years in a row.
788148
the canon photo printer is better because the quality of canon device and the resolution of canon printer is very higher from hp but the cartridge is very expensive .the hp quality and resolution is less but have a cheaper cartridge . my suggestion for a photo printer is canon.\ngood luck
1000078
Depends on what you kind of printing you want to do.  The overall quality of these three manufacturers can vary depending on which kind of machine you get.  Epson might not have the best quality all-in-one machines, but they have more expensive photo printers that are high quality.  HP has good quality for printing text, but on most of their machines the photo quality might be lacking when compared with other manufacturers.\n\nIf you want to just look at the whole picture, then they would probably rank: Canon, HP and Epson.  Canon doesn't have a ton of machines, but even their least expensive ones are usually pretty good quality.  That's what sets them apart from the other two because HP and Epson sell junky entry-level machines that aren't as good as the rest of their models.  Other than that, Epson machines generally require a little more maintenance than HP machines, so that's why they would probably be ranked behind them.
13132
I use an HP Deskjet, All-in-one. It was cheaper, but It serves as a printer, scanner, photocopier, and fax, all at once. I quite like HP, their printers also work under Linux.
25365
If you are looking to print the highest quality photos your inkjet can produce, than the combination of ink and paper is very, very important.  Follow the suggestions of the manufacturer unless you want to take the time (and expense) of experimenting yourself.\n\nIf you are just asking becuase some paper is labeled laser paper and other is inkjet, and your use is typical business, then you have more leeway.  In that  case try a few and see what gives you the best results...\n\nI have used 'laser' paper in my inkjets with results that I was very please with...
904422
Go to your local computer outlet store and get a USB splitter... You can't print from both computers at the same time though, unless the software is provided by printer manufactor.
575780
If you want to use it for the web, then Flash is the best. Otherwise Photoshop and CorelDraw r the best for print-ables. The can be easy to use as they are the widely used softwares and you can find their tutorials on the Internet.
1059856
go to http://www.shutterfly.com  Its cheaper way to go then what you are doing.  Your prints will cost you about a buck apeice after you pay for all that ink they charge 20 cents a peice and 2 bucs for shipping if you order say 15 at a time you will save alot of money.  Think about that. \n\nAlso you answered your own question in the question
373506
I've given up completely with Epson printers.  I think I've had 4 altogether (or about 10 if you count all the replacements).  Never had a 2200 model.  Had a 7800 (acceptable) a C70 and a C60 (appauling) and a basic printer that I can't remember the model number of (dire).\n\nWith the exception of the 7800 I was constantly in maintenance mode, alligning print heads, cleaning nozzles, replacing cartridges etc.  I personally found them to be extremely slow, unreliable and nowhere near as good a quality as was made out.\n\nFrom experience I'd certainly recommend going for a laser printer over an inkjet for normal black and white printing.\n\nI've had or still have Panasonic, Brother and Canon printers which have given me no trouble.  The Panasonic finally got thrown out the other day after about 10 or 12 years of faithful service and printing over half a million pages.  Other than routine servicing there was never a problem with it.  No problems with Canon and the Brother just prints and prints and prints and hardley ever needs new cartidges.\n\nGiven a choice of another Epson or pen and paper I'd stick with the pen and paper.