can the grant of a letters of administration by a court of competent jurisdiction supercede a duly registered?
482725
A court order granting Letters of Administration does not supercede a will.  From your question it appears that the Letters of Administration were granted.  Letters of Administration merely give the person to whom they are granted the right to proceed with the administration of the estate.  This means that he or she can proceed with the collection of all of the assets including all of the stock.  But this collection of assets, called marshalling of assets, is required to be done on behalf of the estate and not for the benefit of particular persons who may or may not be the beneficiaries of the estate.  Once all of the assets are collected in the name of the estate, the administrator must pay all of the debts of the estate and seek an order of distribution from the court.  Only the court, in its order of distribution, can order the stock to be transferred to the beneficiaries.  If you have a will, it can be submitted to the court with a formal Petition that it be admitted to probate in the same case in which the Administrator has been appointed.  The Administrator and other heirs can then formally object to it if there is any basis, and only a court can decide if there is a basis for objection.  If the court rules that it is valid, it must be followed to the extent possible and the order for distribution will be required to reflect the direction of the Testator contained in the Will.  Simply registering or lodging the will with the court is not enough.  You must offer it for probate.  Also you may file a request for special notice which is a document that, once filed, requires the administrator of any court action that he or she intends to take with the court.  Therefore the Administrator must notify you, formally, of any proposed order including the Order for Distribution and if it excludes proper heirs or a properly probated will you will have time to object and have the court require a proper order for distribution.
483490
can u prove it was signed under duress?
1141619
An application process to some type of appeal.
195415
Yes. Just as Indian power of attorney is legal in England.
585561
Yep. If someone files a public welfare petiotion on supreme court, supreme court can pass the ruling on it.
807246
Your auditor/lawyer will be able to get it done at the local subregistrar's office
537049
No - by definition, the signature of the applicant is not a countersignature
931103
As regard the procedure, you should get it typed on a stamp paper and get it notarised (no need to paste postal stamps).  As far as the contents of the affidavits visit the following link :\n\nhttp://passport.bom.nic.in
701403
What is the jurisdiction for this scenario?
988537
This is a question that can only be answered appropriately by the governing body that is issuing such a certificate.  As an objective observation, it may seem to be rather worthless in the real world and have no value whatsoever except perhaps to a person's self-esteem somehow.
304416
Yes otherwise there's no one being appointed and no proxy exsits.  You have to name someone to have someone be your proxy.  \n\nIf you mean do you have to agree to it if you're the one being appointed then no you don't have to sign, your name just has to be listed as the person being appointed.  If you choose not to do anything on behalf of the person that's your choice.  No law forces you to take action on their behalf.  I don't know of anyone who'd list someone who doesn't want to handle issues for them.  It'd just be inviting trouble since they could do whatever the proxy allows regardless of if it's what they want.
930703
The Legal Aid Board will grant you a certificate for legal aid if in the Board's opinion:\n\nyou have passed the merits test and the means test set \nyou have as a matter of law reasonable grounds for instituting, defending or being a party to the proceedings for which legal aid is sought \nyou are reasonably likely to be successful in the proceedings \nthe proceedings for which legal aid is sought are the most satisfactory means of achieving the result sought by you \nhaving regard to all the circumstances (including the probable cost to the Board, measured against the likely benefit to you), it is reasonable to grant the application. \nyour case does not fall within the excluded areas. \nIf the proceedings concern the welfare of a child including custody or access, factors 3 and 5 will not apply.\n\nAnother type of publicly funded help at court consists of the services of an interpreter where the client is unable to express himself adequately in English.  Sign interpreters are available for deaf and dumb clients and any Welsh speaker within the Principality of Wales, irrespective of ability to speak English or not, is entitled to the services of a Welsh-English interpreter.
663893
yes it is. but if that mail client requir's that then u can do that.
1149525
I highly doubt it. One of the reverands primary duties is to act as an authoritative witness when the couple signs the papers.  You can't be a witness for yourself.
46119
not exactly, if the person or agency you are emailing it to agreed to accept an email, it would have to be followed up with an actual hard copy original at some point in most cases. I personally would never accept a scanned copy as it can be greatly altered electronically.
245075
Here is the applicable federal statute:\n\nWhoever knowingly and willfully deposits any mailable matter such as statements of accounts, circulars, sale bills, or other like matter, on which no postage has been paid, in any letter box established, approved, or accepted by the Postal Service for the receipt or delivery of mail matter on any mail route with intent to avoid payment of lawful postage thereon, shall for each such offense be fined under this title.
818714
you can send them a letter cc to a lawyer as well.That will set them .....