What US city has the highest net income percentage?
491068
1. Beverly Hills, CA.\n2. Fairfax County, VA.
721875
Where?  in the US? About 88 per cent.
849427
New York would most likely be considered a "high value target" because of the financial aspect. Most records and fincancial institutes are there. Wipe out wall street and wooooooo..\nAnd too think of how many people could be affected because they are concentrated.\nSecond would likely be Los Angeles for its population and then maybe Chicago.\n\nKind of morbid to think of it but that is a fact the US must consider.....
422952
Michigan boasts the highest paid educators in America, they also boast the strongest state teacher's union in the country.
392589
According to Wikipedia.org these are some of the most important cities in Connecticut. Also (sources link) you can find the richest cities and misc other stuff.\n\nDanbury \nBridgeport \nHartford \nNew Haven \nNew London \nNorwich \nStamford \nWaterbury \nMeriden \nMiddletown \nStorrs \nTorrington \nWillimantic\nBristol \nGreenwich \nManchester \nNew Britain \nNorwalk \nRidgefield \nWest Hartford \nWestport \nEast Hartford
124771
Forbes Magazine did a special report in 2005 entitled "Best Places for Business and Careers." Using data from the research firm Economy.com, Forbes Magazine looked at business costs (labor, energy, tax and office space expenses) and living costs (housing, transportation, food and other household expenditures) to come up with their list. Texas and Virginia come up at the top of the list with 7 areas in the top 20 because of highly educated labor force, and relatively low business cost.\n\nThe Best Metros are:\n\n1. Boise ID \n2. Raleigh-Durham NC \n3. Austin TX \n4. Washington DC - Northern VA\n5. Albuquerque NM \n6. Huntsville AL \n7. Fayetteville AR \n8. Norfolk VA \n9. Atlanta GA \n10. Madison WI\n\nThe Forbes website (link below) also includes ranking by cost of doing business, job growth, educational attainment, population. They also have a ranking for small metro areas.\n\nIsabel Isidro\nhttp://www.powerhomebiz.com
1061151
Funny you ask that questions, I was just reading about this this morning. Check below from Fox New, hope this helps:)\nCensus: Fastest Growing U.S. Cities Are in Suburbs \nWednesday, June 21, 2006\n \n STORIES \n•College Grads Chase Jobs, Culture to Big U.S. Cities•Census: Americans Moving to Rural Areas \nWASHINGTON — Elk Grove, Calif., wasn't even incorporated six years ago, and now it's the fastest-growing city in America. \n\nBigger, older cities are losing ground.\n\nThe Sacramento suburb grew by 11.6 percent last year, to 112,000 people, typifying the nation's appetite for open spaces, affordable homes and suburban living. Once a rural farming community, Elk Grove has given way to sprawling development, fueled by a short commute to Sacramento and local employers such as Apple Computer.\n\n"Ten to 15 years ago is when the housing started coming in. That was followed by the businesses," says Janet Toppenberg, president and CEO of the Elk Grove Chamber of Commerce.\n\nAmericans have been moving west and south for decades, and last year was no different. All but three of the 50 fastest-growing cities from 2004 to 2005 were in those regions of the country, with many in California and Florida, according to Census Bureau estimates Wednesday. The estimates were for cities with populations of 100,000 or more.\n\nClick here to read more on the report from the Census Bureau.\n\n(Story continues below)\n\n ADVERTISEMENTSAdvertise Here  \n \n\n\nElk Grove was followed in the top five by North Las Vegas, Nev.; Port St. Lucie, Fla.; Gilbert, Ariz., and Cape Coral, Fla.\n\nAll five are suburban, and all have fewer than 200,000 residents.\n\n"We have a pattern that is consistent across the country," said Hans Johnson, a research fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California. "Families choose to move to areas where they can buy more housing for less money and often with better schools."\n\nAmericans also are moving away from many of the nation's biggest cities, though the reasons vary with the cities.\n\nPeople are following jobs out of struggling Midwestern cities. Others are leaving expensive Northeastern and Western cities in search of more affordable homes. And people are fleeing big cities everywhere in search of better schools.\n\nNew York remained the nation's largest city, with 8.1 million people. The city has added 135,000 people since 2000, but it lost 21,500 from 2004 to 2005, more than any other city.\n\nDetroit, with its struggling economy, has lost 65,000 people since 2000, the most of any city. Philadelphia, which has lost about 50,000 manufacturing jobs since 2000, has lost 54,000 people during the same period.\n\nSan Francisco, with the highest real estate prices in the country, has lost 37,000 people since 2000, according to the Census Bureau.\n\nThe bureau issues annual population estimates based on building permits, housing units and other changes since its 2000 headcount.\n\nStates sometimes dispute those estimates based on their own calculations. For example, California officials estimate that San Francisco has grown by 22,000 people since 2000, rather than shrinking. But even if the city did add people, it did so at a much slower rate than cities in the center of the state, said John Malson, a research manager for the state Department of Finance.\n\n"The housing market out here has gone nuts, especially in the coastal areas," Malson said.\n\n"The Central Valley is still more affordable than the coast," he added. "A lot of people are moving out from the Bay area."\n\nMost of the big cities that gained population were in the South, according to the Census Bureau.\n\nIn overall numbers, Phoenix added the most people — 44,400 — from 2004 to 2005, giving it a population of nearly 1.5 million.\n\nNew Orleans, an exception in the South, had already lost population before Hurricane Katrina. The city lost about 30,000 people from
411329
With the percentage of creative class workers in the mid- to high 30s and with world-class universities, high-tech resources, vibrant downtowns and educated, responsive workforces, cities such as Raleigh-Durham; Washington, D.C.; San Francisco; Sacramento; New Haven; San Diego; Dallas; Philadelphia; and others - including mid-size cities such as Tucson, Allentown and Little Rock and small cities such as New London, CT; Des Moines; and Lansing - are exploiting, in the best sense of that word, their important market resources and building on them to create good jobs and livable communities.
933492
California continues to be the state with the highest proportion of immigrants, with 26.9 percent of residents born abroad in the 2002 count, up from 26.2 percent in 2000, the survey concluded. \n\nAmong large cities, San Francisco and San Jose rank fifth and sixth in the nation, respectively, for their high percentages of foreign-born residents. They rank behind Miami, Santa Ana, Los Angeles and Anaheim. New York is seventh.
75814
It all depends on where you plan to live and work. \n\nKansas City: $32,955\nTopeka: $31,357\nWichita: $31,949
59977
Fort Worth, Texas.....It has the lowest cost of living with the highest salary ratios in the country.  A 3000 square foot home in California costing $600,000 can be purchased in Fort Worth for less than $250.000.  In addition, Texas does not have state income tax as most other states do.  You will bring home more money in Texas than in most other states.  NYC and California are two of the most expensive places to live in the U.S.  Fort Worth is growing rapidly and there are plenty of opportunities for a variety of careers.\n\nGood luck and live well!
311997
If you're talking about state income tax, then it might be a couple depending on tax bracket.  Possibly Vermont or DC.\n\nSales tax is probably California.
648188
http://www.bestplaces.net/col/?salary=100000&city1=6440&city2=1920\n\nprovides a comparison w/Dallas, TX and Portland, OR
1119861
I say ATL- not because I live here. Atlanta is a work in progress and has much potential to be the best. LA is great if you have work there that can pay your rent and bills. Detroit is too cold(I'm from Indiana) and Houston I don't know about, just that it is IN Texas ^_^
649850
maybe neither...\n\nIt is based on the place where you earned your income.
808738
Sacramento, Califorina\n\nThis place is growing faster than anyone can belive\nyou want work I would go to Sacramento
70572
I'd have to say Austin. Plenty of stuff to do, large parks, and it's a big college town.