Try Solving this classic paradox?
483853
You said "57 + 2 = 59"\nIt should be "57 - 2 = 55", which was what was spent.
253239
***********************Spoiler Alert***********************\n\nThe puzzle is solvable. I spent about 4 mind-racking hours on it. Click the link to see the puzzle together. :-)
1066144
Without the knowledge of where point e is, this problem is insolvable.\n\nI suspect, however, from a brief diagramming session, that you will need to solve for the length of ab using the Pythagorean Theorem, and set up similar triangles.
1113261
hypothetically\n\nan infinite number
1018412
do you really want someone else to think for you?\nhmmm...well then...\nhere it goes...\n1. look in your math book...there are examples of how to do this problem...\n2. same answer as above!!!\n#3... same...\n\n#4!!!! remember Einstein solved "un-solve able" problems!!!
1139143
Counterclockwise to both questions.
133517
the solutions is 7,8,3,2 or 7,6,5,2. The problem works with both sets of numbers.
695134
Isn't that a paradox?
95684
try to pawn it, multiply the offered value times 3 or more
978758
There's a mathematical riddle that claims to "prove" 1 = 2, but if you examine it closely enough, it turns out to be dividing by 0.  Sorry I csn't remember the riddle.
368963
Hello i dnt think its possible but u can try with AIEEE this is equilent to B.E
1123895
You'll need to restate that problem.\nIt's not solvable as written.
294990
Imagining the world with no hypothetical situations is a hypothetical situation itself.  It's an impossible paradox.
155155
Yes. Do a Google search for Zeno's paradox.
1087622
Use the explanation given in the last question you asked, and just put 12 in place of 4 from the previous problem.
277593
In your case use your fingers bye the way 2+2 = 4
917052
16/24....it's really not that hard...you should be able to solve it on your own.\nps. you might want to simplify it down to 2/3.