Brillients tell me this- When a car crossing a overbridge.?
486575
Provided the bridge is not high enough, the vertical component will not change.\n\nThe tep. will remain constant if the train is in uniform motion.
609746
upside down\nwhile driving
1044240
My best guess is paid spectators and an off-cam crane.  Not only is it my best guess, it's the only sane guess I think can be made.\n\nNo group of unpaid, ordinary street schmoes are going to just keep exclaiming "unbelievable" and "are you getting this?" as seen in this clip.
1051502
Trick question! They aren't even on the same road!
120545
CROSS + ROADS = DANGER\n96233 + 62513 = 158746
519181
Build a bridge and get over it!
934996
Too many mouses here in Britain.\n\n£8 just to enter the city? Your having a fecking laugh.\n\nI suggest that everybody melts a congestion/speed camera today and send a clear message that we dont want these petty little men charging us for the right to use OUR cars on public roads.
38833
We need to know how wide the road is. If it's a two lane road, it would only take about a second to cross.
701082
If you are travelling fast I would think the signal would be completely disrupted...:D
813855
Do you mean the road signs?\n\nRight double curve:\nhttp://driving.information.in.th/images/thai-right-double-turn-warning.jpg\nLeft double curve:\nhttp://driving.information.in.th/images/thai-left-double-turn-warning.jpg
554326
The police are correct in their assessment.  Without an independent, disinterested witness to the state of the traffic signal, it comes down to "he said, she said" and unless one of you is of such poor character as to be not believable then it is a wash.  \n\nIf there were any other drivers that witnessed the accident but did not stop, it might be worth taking out an advert in the local rag asking if anyone witnessed the accident and would be willing to come forward and make a statement.\n\nBest of luck!
785771
Here is what a narrow bridge sign looks like. What the driver is suppose to do when they see one is slow down. That way if there is not enough room for the driver to cross the bridge (example: Another vehicle coming from the other direction, driver's vehicle to wide, etc) then they will have time to stop.\n\nhttp://www.snapdrive.net/files/162497/136709497.jpg
809075
As a Londoner, I've put this on my watch list --- I can't wait to see what some damnfool person from over the water will make of your question ! ! ! (Sorry I can't shed any light on your question - for obvious reasons !)
653370
its more stresful when you have large trucks on the bridge.  cars, unless they start making them out of lead, will really have NO effect or stress on the bridge.  That is how most bridges are tested (and why so many bridges have weight limits for trucks)  on paper.  civil engineers test out 'what would happen' if a large truck filled with water drove across, and to see how safe it would be.\n\nso, unless the bridge was filled with water trucks, and dumptrucks carrying rocks, etc.  you werent in any danger, and even if it was, the bridge is rated to handle a lot o weight with factors of safety being factored into the design, in case just such a scenario happened.\n\nbut to answer your question, assumeing that there is no great vibration or curves, its always better to have the least amount of weight on the bridge as possible
767695
dont let the transporter hit your a*s on the way out ;P
867128
At worst, it puts a dead stop to any further downslide.\nThink of it like an out-of-control truck being stopped by a massive roadblock.  There will still be an accident, but less damage than if you allowed that out-of-control truck to continue careening down the highway.
401412
As I understand it, the metal takes the hit of the lightening and the key to your safety is to avoid touching any metal attached to the base of the car while the lightening strike is active.\n\nI certainly hope I'll never have any cause to find out whether my understanging is correct!