Did Gatsby love Daisy in the past or in the future?
483111
He loved her in the past and still loved her at his death (that is why he was there getting run over!).
88929
i do believe so...\n\nmore likely traveling into the past makes more scientific sense than into the future...\n\nwell, u enver know wut we gon discover in the nex years... u never know...\n\njus like thing used to be myth in the past, now, its jus a piece of common sense
1011178
No, daisy is Donald Ducks love interest.  I haven't seen daffy with anyone.  A few times he was with a regular looking female duck (regular as in - didn't talk or act human at all).  But just in a couple of really old episodes, and just for a minute.  Daffy didn't have a girfriend in Tiny Toones.
874261
Definitely past tense. You will make statements about things that "have happened" in the past, as opposed to things that "are happening" in the future.
965582
I think there's a reason most fairy tales are set in "old times" -it boils it down to essentials. People and places, no robotic arms or bionic wolfs to clutter up the meaning or moral of the story. Anyway "modern technology" has really only existed for about 100 years...about 0.1% of human history. \n\nIf modern technology and modes and means were to be included the scope of the story would have to be broadened...what's the point of a character going to an automated-replenishing dispenser when they can go to a "shop" in a simple story? Form follows function...if the story is set in the future and can include some technology for a good reason then it might be there to accomplish some end in the story. Read Podkayne of Mars by Robert Heinlein, it's almost a kids' story but it's set in space and does have some "modern" elements.\n\nThere might be stories in the future like "little Timmy the robot went to the great central computer..." if that's the norm for people. \n\nI would oppose modernization for the sake of modernization. There's a word that fits here: pointless. Now I need to find something better to do too, haha.
374876
When Meyer Wolfsheim describes the murder of Rosy Rosenthal at the Metropole years before, his language, mannerisms etc., seem to indicate that he is somewhat a shady man himself gleaned from his discussion of money, guns, and gang connections.How do we know this.\nGatsby tells Nick that Meyer is the man who fixed the 1919 World Series. This is hardly the sort of man with whom a person of Gatsby's claimed background and esteem would associate with.\nNick is shocked about everything relating to Meyer Wolfsheim - due to his proper Midwestern upbringing. So he becomes curious about Gatsby's relationship to Meyer. His doubts are further aroused when Gatsby is away from the table to make a phone call; Meyer brags to the host on being quizzed by him, that he has know Gatsby for several years and he is a "man of fine breeding" and a handsome and perfect gentleman who is "very careful about women." \nThe introduction Of Rosy Rosenthal in the conversation thus gives Nick an indication that Gatsby may not be what he claims to be.
856770
I don't believe this is a direct quote from Alcott's poems.  Based on the article linked below, it actually seems to a summarization by Paula J. Caplan, a Harvard sociologist, of what women in the 19th century wrote. \n\nHere is an excerpt from the New York Times article published August 11, 2005, and written by Stephanie Rosenbloom:\n\nPerhaps the last time that young women were as willing as they are now to admit to their attraction to each other was in the 19th century. “Back when Louisa May Alcott was writing, women were writing these letters to each other,” Dr. Caplan said. “They wrote: ‘I miss you desperately. I long to hug you and talk to you all night.’ ” Referring to another woman as a girl crush, she said, is not dissimilar to that 19th century behavior.\n\nNotice the use of "they wrote" as opposed to "Louisa May Alcott wrote" within this piece.
729415
OMG. This is hilarious. I am doing Annabel Lee in my Literature class right now! Okay so, it is about Edgar Allen Poe and his love for his 13-year old cousin who he married. She died an early death of Tuberculosis, and in the poem, Poe says that the angels were jealous of his loving relationship with Annabel Lee ( in real life, her name was Virginia) and so they were the ones who envied Annabel Lee's love with Edgar Allen Poe, so they took her from him. Poe died two years after Annabel Lee died.
1005165
By changing the present (or past) it doesn't necessarily change the outcome in the future.  Watch or read "The Time Machine" by HG Wells and that will explain it more.  I would suggest reading it.\n\nSome things are just inevitable and will occur regardless of how we act or react to situations at any time.\n\nI read that you remembered in T2 the hand and chip were saved.  As they studied these items, things could start to be set in motion by the machines that may occur in the future.  Now, assume that we run out of fossil fuels and the sun dims, but life still exists.  Without electricity or fuel that doesn't mean that we won't have the technology to go to war or destroy ourselves.\n\nI guess that's why in showbiz they call it creative licensing.  They can leave any door open to make more.
326810
Yes I think if Harry lives he and Ginny will get back together.  Harry loves Ginny, and she loves him.  Harry only broke up with Ginny to protect her from Voldemort.  Ginny will prove that she is a powerful wizard in her own right and prove to Harry she can take care of herself.  Also I agree with others here, she may not be as pretty as Cho Chang, but she has a warm heart, and she is fierce, that is what Harry finds attractive.
1121036
both qustions use the premise that the future hasn't happende yet but the past has. Your memory remembers things that have happened to you personally. Really, you can't change the future, since its not set in stone as the past is, Since it hasn't happened yet, it can't be changed. You can however change your actions in a way that makes it seem like the future had changed from what it should have been, but you werw supposed to make those changes, and did notchange anything.\nYou didn't change the future, just yourself at that moment in time.
628810
I hope it wasn't due four days ago. I find it ironic that with all the concern about teen-suicide, that Romeo and Juliet is usually required reading at this age. I think the Leonardo DiCaprio version that came out is a good version for understanding the universal values that Shakespeare's generation shares with today.\n\nAnger, though played with gently, still leads to death.\n\nFew know what passions beat within the heart of another.\n\nFirst love, is beautiful and pure, and blind to the misery the future holds.\n\nAs for what I learned...while love may be true, deception never serves it well.
845711
No, there is not a book what tells the future.\n\nBut there may be a book that tells the future. Not all the future. Just parts of it.\n\nLike who wins.\n\n(I've read it and I know)
1146835
William has a fiancee, but I can't remember her name. Harry had a South African girlfriend, daughter to a tycoon, I can't remember her name either.
30709
If time travel were possible some one fro the future would have already been here and become a Las Vegas Odds Maker.
496680
His mistress..what else.  She is there, i think, to give some irony.  Both Daisy adn her husband are cheating on each other, and both people's other man/woman die.
956958
IN THE MEMORIES OF FUTURE