Why can't liberals wait until Bush starts murdering thousands here (like Saddam) before they ruin him?
480306
Because that will never happen. The President's job is to protect American lives, and he is doing an outstanding job. The economy is booming, unemployment is at 4.7%, jobs are being added at the rate of 200,000 per month, and there have been no terror attacks on US soil in almost 5 years.\n\nThe Democrats do not have a viable political strategy to win back Congress or the White House. That - coupled with the fact that a lot of liberals and Democrats STILL haven't gotten over the election of 2000 - means that their strategy is to bash the President.\n\nFor example, Democrats are bashing President Bush over the price of gas - even though the President can no more set the price of gas than he can set the price of an airline ticket. Yet, the Democrats have also blocked every initiative to drill for more oil in our own back yard. They have blocked drilling in the ANWR Reserve (the LARGEST oil deposit in North America) and in the Gulf of Mexico. Instead, the Mexicans and FIDEL CASTRO are pumping out all of the oil. And still they blame President Bush.\n\nWith a strategy like that, I look forward to the Republicans keeping control of the House and the Senate this November.
1108975
In keeping with their "Aid & Comfort To The Enemy" agenda-the liberals will do anything;say anything to harm the U.S. under President Bush because they can no longer win elections .They have done more to hurt the morale of our troops than ever before and I'm wondering why we don't hold trials for treason. John Kerry & Jane Fonda would be the first to be tried .The far left & the drive-by media were strangely silent when Zarqawi was video-taped beheading people-but are the first to jump on the band wagon against our troops while in harms way .There ought to be a law!
366154
Hating Bush is more important then saving lives to most wacko leftist people.\n\nThe leftist in this country backed Hitler also, so their love for murderers like Hussein is nothing new.\n\nDid God save the Jews, or did U.S. service men? idiot.\n\nNobody said that murder loving idiots can't speak their minds. Did anyone say that?\n\nSome people are just racists and put a price on human life, some people think all human life is equally important.
699924
HA! You need to qualify that to ask why do they NOW say this! Look at these documented quotes from liberals BEFORE we ousted Saddam:\n\n"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." \n       President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.     \n\n"Together we must also confront the new hazards of chemical and biological weapons, and the outlaw states, terrorists and organized criminals seeking to acquire them. Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade, and much of his nation's wealth, not on providing for the Iraqi people, but on developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them." \n       President Clinton, Jan. 27, 1998.     \n\n"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." \n       Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.     \n\n"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." \n       Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998.     \n\n"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." \n       Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.     \n\n"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." \n      Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.     \n\n"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." \n       Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.     \n\n"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." \n       Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.     \n\n"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." \n       Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.     \n\n"We know that he has stored away secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." \n       Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.     \n\n"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." \n       Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.     \n\n"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." \n       Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.     \n\n"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build u
335511
I think that we will eventually get into a war with them, if some bleeding heart liberal gets elected, I don't think we will do anything to stop them.  \n\nHeres what I want to happen, We need to either set up a military overthrow, and set up a true democracy there, or we need to go in there, and systematically destroy every facility that is even remotely assosciated with neuclear anything, and then assasinate a bunch of people in the government.\nHopefully, this is what bush will do, 1. Kill welfare, 2. with all that money, fund a full scale invasion of Iran.  3. If neccesary, draft...
1120742
IT IS CALLED WAR!!! Get the big picture - Saddam gone, women not beaten & raped for what male family members did, women allowed education, hundreds of thousands of people no longer being slaughtered by Saddam, women not forced to wear burmas ( long black completely covering), 1st democratic vote taken, & etc.  We have done lots of good just given little credit for it by liberals.\n\n\nGo back & read all of Jefferson's speech, he did not mean personal safety - he meant if safety as a nation is not worth our freedom as a nation, not as individuals. Liberals see everything as me, me , me - my safety, my freedom, my country's freedom - forget everyone else. We are part of a big world & must help defend other nations or our freedom will not be deserved.
486793
I am not and I would like to round up all liberals and send them to GITMO and let all of them stand in a circle, holding hands with their muslim brothers, singing peace\nsongs before they're beheaded by their peaceful muslim brothers. Maybe, then maybe they might get the message. No one will ever get my 2 weapons, except barrel first.
1089390
Ya! When Saddam was murdering Iraqis by the thousands and putting them in mass graves, that was none of our business!  And when he used chemical and biological weapons on his own people, we should just continue to let it happen! And when his sons put live people into wood chippers feet first so they can watch themselves die, that's not nearly as bad as giving them a chance to vote and be free. And when they had state rapists to rape and torture people and murder four year olds of people who dared to speak out against Saddam, that's way better than an elected government!  Ya! Shame on us. \n\nCooldude, You are a f'n ideological idiot!
814370
They just don't like what President Bush is doing right now with the War on Iraq,   They know that everything is going great with the economy, and that just drives them crazy.  Liberals seem to think more than act.
788157
The liberals are the terrorists best friend.  The terrorists can concentrate on fighting us in Iraq because they know the liberals will do their job in America.
987828
Wow the Libs go nuts when someone dares criticize their point of view but it's just fine for them to say that Bush is an idiot.  It's a the same double standard that when we Killed that piece of filth Zarkawi they cried "Were his rights violated?" but think noting wen two of our guys were murdered and their bodies desecrated.
1077444
as soon as we finish cleaning up Iraq,he we come.Im sure the world will hate us for it but it will have to be done.As long as we dont have a pansy liberal in office who cares more about world opinion than the safety of the citizens of the greatest country on earth,we will do what HAS to be done
752021
No, the radical left will insist on wastng time with investigations, and try to impeach Bush even though there is no cause for it.  The bush haters in the dem party of so crazed, they need thearpy.
789630
Graig C, I don't believe that Saddam is going to be executed. His next trials will drag on for 2 more years until next president will forgive him. Bush only hyped Saddam's execution before the election for political purposes. Bush can't be charged for mass murdering innocent people and thousands of our troops because of the patriotic act he signed. That was indeed shrewed of the neoconservatives. Yes, Saddam was a bad dictator and perhaps deserves to be killed, but he was not the worst dictator. Why is Bush picking on Saddam? USA built him up and made him bad. Rumsfeldt dealt with Saddam and supported him in the past. USA saved Saddam's butt in the past from many assassinations designed by his Shiites rebels. They gave him all the weapons and chemicals to defend himself from those Shiites rebels. Now because Saddam refused to cooperate with the USA like Qaddafi did and because we need Saddam's oil, so he is no good? What about Sudan's President Al-Bashir, who is killing innocent people left and right in Darfur? What about Libya's president, Qaddafi the horrible dictator? What about Egypt's president, Mr. Mubarak, the selfish bad dictator? What about Syria's President, Mr. Al-Assad, who is killing and jailing his opponents every day? What about Saudi Arabia King and his Sheiks, who hate Christians and oppressing outsiders (not Saudis)? Should we invade their countries and execute those dictators as well? C'mon Republicans, Is this logical? It is fine if you want to bully people around and control the oil resources in the world, but this is not the way to do it. Brutal Military Action as we are experiencing, destroying other countries and killing innocent civilians does not match our Great American Values and Morals. I am really ashamed of our president Bush and his bad ethics. God Bless the USA and our troops forever.
558201
YOUR ****** retards Libs\n\nYou got no candadite for president and you cant handel that.  ANd the person that says bush has let too many people die for nothing, do you consider freeing the iraqi people nothing, women can now go to school, drive cars, everyone can listen to the radio and watch TV, whatever if thats nothing do you.\n\nDo you like kennedy, he wasn't a conservative, and he started to get us involed in a conflict that killed 58,000 American lives, nothing was accomplished while we were there.  \n\nLibs can't see through the media.  We have a great conservative president and our liberal media does exposes all the bad parts of war.  For some reason they would rather our country hear about the 3 people that died in a car bomb then all the victories we have there
424641
Guy's like Bush and Cheney have liberated millions of people in Iraq.  No more torture, rape or mass killings.  What is wrong with that?  The world is a safer place without Saddam.  If you can honestly disagree with that then I know you are a f***ing nut.  I am going to assume that you are a looney liberal.  Aren't liberals the ones who care more about human rights and helping people less fortunate?  Obviously not.  If you want a socialist society, more government control of your life, then go ahead and keep making idiotic statements.  Bush was elected.  That means the MAJORITY of Americans have the same views as him.  If you don't like it, move to France.  They would welcome a coward like you with open arms.
1137868
The Americans have been gunning for his death all along, and\nwill defiantly impress upon the tribunal to give the Death penalty.\n\nBut you must also know, that even today Saddam is a feared and respected man by many in Iraq.The outcome will not be settled so fast. Did you see the Glaring eyes & stance when in court he recently told the judge"I am the ruler of Iraq and who are you, a foreigner trying to pass judgement on me?"\n\nThe recent spate of bombings in Iraq between the Shias and Sunnis is directly connected with Saddams case. Which country\nwould ever allow a foreign country to set up courts?\n\nNo. The chair will probably decay &break, and the switches/\nwires will rust or melt away.And dont suggest a rope, because there is no such strong rope exists in the World to snap such a\nstrong throat.