why does george bush does not respond to venezuelan's president aggresions ?'?
492357
What makes you think there is no response?  I believe it's likely that there are spies and saboteurs inflicting all kinds of REAL but insidious damage... one can only hope.
231133
Have you noticed you haven't gotten any responses?..lol...No bush supporters out there, I'm not one, but love the fact no one answered..lol
881080
Maybe "his people" don't trust him in front of the camera for a while?\n\nMaybe someone else had to write what they did for him because he refused to make an apology of any kind, even the half-hearted one that was sent over the net?\n\nMaybe he's a wimp!?!?!
341644
His behavior cannot be justified as it is based in greed. Not much is made of the memo here in the states by the so called liberal press. He was looking to go to war with Iraq any way he could but his decision is immersed in the oil fields not the people. He don't care about our people, why would he care about them.
511058
The same reason George Bush can't say "Nuclear";\n\nIGNORANCE!
1125603
President Bush was put in a situation that no President has been in in a long time (Pearl Harbor)--when the United States was attacked on their own soil. We take for granted that we are surrounded by the ocean and idiots (Canada, Mexico, and Cuba, for example.) We had to send a message to the world that the United States will not sit around and be attacked. While the gas prices have jumped considerably since his Presidency started, it isn't entirely his fault. He has tried to drill in Alaska for oil but the Democrats will not let him. While he may have a big stake in the gas and oil industry, he certainly doesn't need the extra money from it. I would say that for all that he has had to deal with he has done a tremendous job.
913039
bush Jr is disliked by most of the people in the world. he second to ladden in some countries as per polls done by the guardian news papers. except UK, there is no friend to the USA .he is considered as danger to world peace even in countries like Israel and the UK.but it was not so in the case of Clinton.he did not take a brutal decision like invading Iraq without valid reason and caused for the deaths of  more than 600000 iraqis.
43605
He has angered westerners because he thinks of Iran's independency. Every thing insulates Iran's resources against westerners' cupidity is "a threat to world peace". Of course the true sentence is "a thread to our interests or cupidity".\nThis is the Bush's sentences: "At the start of 2006, more than half the people of our world live in democratic nations. And we do not forget the other half -- in places like Syria, Burma, Zimbabwe, North Korea, and Iran -- because the demands of justice, and the peace of this world, require their freedom as well."\nYou can find it in this url:\nhttp://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/31/sotu.transcript/index.html\nI have a question. Iran is more democratic or Saudi Arabia which its women can not vote or be a lawmaker. Why are not the names of countries like Saudi Arabia in the Bush's speeches????????\nDo not believe in their false pretenses.\nIf you follow westerners and try to please them, they escape. A good example is Turkey. They are like shadow, if you follow them they escape, if you escape they follow you.
820795
as per the recent poll conducted by the guardian news paper, bush outranked the presidents of Iran and north Korea who are regarded as danger to world peace. the poll was conducted in Canada, Israel, the UK and the USA and in some countries he was second to osama. the peace loving , democratic people of the USA sent signals to the world that they do not approve bush's policy in Iraq. the number of civilians killed is not 150000 but more than 600000 and all third world countries must unite and denounce bush's policy in Iraq and bring pressure on the UN to establish an international tribune for the trial of bush for war crimes in Iraq.
210511
YAWN.   George bush at least we are allowed to Verbally bash the President in this country try doing that in Cuba.
621066
HE LEFT THE QUESTION TOTALLY OPEN TO DEFEND BUSH ANY WAY YOU CAN... TALK ABOUT ANY GOOD POINT...\n\nYOU APPEAR, FOR THE MOST PART, TO BE HAIVNG PROBLEMS DOING IT (GRANTED, HE MAY HAVE CALLED THEM LIES, BUT IT'S STILL AN OPEN FORUM)... I CAN UNDERSTAND WHY YOU WOULD HAVE PROBLEMS...\n\nI SWEAR TO GOD I COULD DEFEND HIM BETTER THAN HIS FANS DO ON HERE... GEEZ!
1177009
George W Bush is arguably the most hostile president in the history of the USA.\n\nHis foreign policy hostilities have alienated the USA from several European countries.  At least his father was wise enough to actually build a multilateral force against Saddam Hussein when Iraq tried to take over Sudan.\n\nHis poorly planned, self serving war on Saddam Hussien (disguised as a war on terror) has painted a target on the backs of all Americans, Canadians and Australians (as well as their soldiers).\n\nHe doesn't know how to come up with a well-conceived plan.  His "no child left behind" plan was a great idea in theory.  It would be awesome to have our schools do whatever is possible to make sure that all children of all ethniticities and socio-economical backgrounds have a good change at going to school and doing well.  The only problem is that George W decided that all the states should pay for his plan - at the expense of essential jobs such as police and firemen.  George's law says that sending students to school is significantly more important than having enough policemen and firemen protecting the public.   His poorly conceived plan did not include federal funding - not HIS problem.\n\nHe lies so often that he has no credibility.  After the first election where the Florida Hanging Chads (who were not 21 years old and not registered to vote) placed him in office, he promised to reach out to the Democrats.  If American held their breaths waiting for that promise to be delivered - we would all be dead.\n\nHe is unable to separate Church and State siding with the Religious Right more often than he sides with the American public he swore to serve.\n\nThe unfortunate thing is that  years down the road, some people may hail him for freeing Iraq and setting up a democracy there.   They will ignore all the harm he has done and how poorly he has run his administrations.\n\nI have the utmost respect for the office of The President of the United States of America.  I have absolutely no respect for the cold, callous, insensitive person who is abusing that office right now.  Fortunately, due to our well conceived constitution, this too shall pass.
681321
yeah, i asked how come the pres hasn't been assasinated yet. they got to me!  they said it incited violence and hatred. i was simply asking why it hadn't happened yet, not advocating it. i failed to mention that if he DID happen to get shock-n-awed, i'd uncork 10 bottles of frikkin champagne, but you never heard me say that!
912100
Bush may not even know. He just does what he is told. Remember, this is a President who did not even know there was internal strife in Iraq, or that the Sunni, S’hia, and Kurds even existed as independent entities, before he invaded. He did this even though his own father had written in his 1998 book ‘A World Transformed’ what a bad idea it was. He invaded even after Colin Powell warned him that “if you break it, then you own it”.\n\nSo, on the one hand, it is because he is uninformed and does not know anything about any of the major issues. Then, there are the problems associated with his learning disability that make him an ineffective speaker if he gets off-message. It was embarrassing when he bailed out of appearing before England’s parliament during one of his visits there because his handlers decided he was not up to the task – something that Tony Blair faces on a regular basis. \n\nNo one in the world takes Bush seriously, other than in matters of his reckless misuse of America’s military. Leaders from North Korea, Iran, and other countries routinely punk Bush to his face. They play him like a chump just because they can and they like to make him look weak and foolish on TV.\n\nWhen he and Hugo Chavez were both at the UN, the Secret Service had to peek around corners to make sure that Bush did not accidentally run into Chavez and have to speak to him. \n\nHow pathetic is it for the President of the United States to be sneaking through the halls like he is in High School and trying to avoid someone that he is afraid to face?
1022186
Because the American government embraces any thug who will co-operate in their quest to control as much of the world and its wealth as they can take from others. Were he to stop co-operating with them, he would be vilified as Hugo Chavez is now, only he would deserve it. The current (and unelected) American government is not remotely interested in Democracy, but hopes there are enough stupid people around to believe what they say and to not notice what they are actually doing.\nListen to "Democracy Now, The War and Peace Report" if you ever get the chance.   <democracynow.org>
78508
He got elected for a second term and when it's up he can't ever get elected again.The people who support Mr. bush  and approve of what he is doing are the one's who are getting rich.It's all about oil and money.If they run a monkey for president and oil and money was backing him up ,he'd get elected.Even if you didn't vote for the monkey.
579062
Of course they do.  The reason why the elected gov't is opposed is because the people with  money aren't making out like they used to.  The gov't is now working for its people and not its business.  That's why the United States is so willing to support the coup leaders, because it is their business interests that are at stake.  God forbid the people get taken care of first.\n\nThe reason why the opposition aren't able to elect anyone or get their referendum passed  is because an overwhelming majority of the people living in Venezuela support their gov't.