What's the difference between precis and paraphase? Examples plz! :)?
485827
Paraphrase involves putting a passage from source material into your own words. A paraphrase must also be attributed to the original source. Paraphrased material is usually shorter than the original passage, taking a somewhat broader segment of the source and condensing it slightly. \n Example: \nORIGINAL:\nStudents frequently overuse direct quotation in taking notes, and as a result they overuse quotations in the final [research] paper. Probably only about 10% of your final manuscript should appear as directly quoted matter. Therefore, you should strive to limit the amount of exact transcribing of source materials while taking notes. \n\nPARAPHRASE:\nIn research papers students often quote excessively, failing to keep quoted material down to a desirable level. Since the problem usually originates during note taking, it is essential to minimize the material recorded verbatim \n\nPRECISE:\nStudents should take just a few notes in direct quotation from sources to help minimize the amount of quoted material in a research paper
405648
The difference is the spelling and wording :)
66275
In the 1950's (and, evidently, also the 1970's), it was diagramming.\n\nNowadays, it's not diagramming but parsing.  Parsing uses terms like Noun Phrase or NP, and Verb Phrase or VP.\n\nParsing is illustrated at the link below:
199585
It sounds almost like you are referring to the 'grammar' of a particular language.  If you create a union or concatenation of two different languages which are context free, the intersection is not necessarily context free.  That is one of the properties of a context-free grammar.\n\nHowever, since you claim that L1 intersecs L2 and that it is context free, I can logically deduce that the grammar for both L1 and L2 is context free based on the aforementioned property of context-free grammars.
694182
Prefix=add a prefix to (ie. RE: or FWD:)\n\nSynonym=prescript
785640
S phase in interphase
177090
In the reference I found they kept referring to both terms without explainging the difference.\n\nI spent some time trying to figure it out but its beyond me. \n\n Even though it means losing 3 points its better to delete this question and consider reposting it with different wording than give the points to someone who does not answer it.
791273
Definitely b...\nDuring Interphase, there are 3 subphases - G1, S, and G2.  G1 is for growth of the cell, S is for synthesis of an extra set of chromosomes (amount of DNA in cells), and G2 is for preparation for the rest of cell division.  After interphase is prophase (nuclear membrane dissolves and DNA bundles up), then metaphase (DNA lines up on the center of the cell), anaphase (DNA separates towards poles), and telophase (Cell divides into two cells).  I hope this helps!\n\nAnswer: b. between the G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle
122440
no difference....just different terms
774494
No, a simple predicate just encompasses the entire verb of the sentence, while disregarding the object of the sentence, which would be the rest of the sentence. \n\nIn your example:\n\n- Leadbelly is the subject and also the simple subject\n- has influenced many folk, country, and pop singers is the predicate\n- has influenced is the simple predicate\n\nHope that helps!
700550
i think pb termed for pre board exams. if  i am right then go through the chapter bcoz whether its board or pre board questions are asked on the basis of application of theory and basic concept. better u should have given class and stream in ur question.
1177241
the first one was in past tense and the other one is in past progressive tense\nthe meaning is the same. the difference is how the sentence was constructed
895516
Prophase\nPrometaphase\nMetaphase\nAnaphase\nTelophase\nCytokinesis\nclick here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitosis#Phases_of_mitosis
656462
The two basic parts to a sentence are the subject and the predicate.\n\nA subject tells who or what the sentence is mostly about (noun or pronoun).\nThe predicate shows action or a state of being (verb).\nA sentence also requires a complete thought.\n\nYour examples all contain two complete thoughts, but only one of them is joined correctly (with a comma and a conjunction) as a compound sentence. (You also need to add a period.)
412955
I don't know. Whats the difference?
655567
the first link explains system boundary and the second is an explanation of computer simulations in the context of "conceptualizing a system".  hope this helps
691650
No, they are not the same. The first one is grammatically incorrect & should not be used. The second is grammatically correct & is used in the context of the comparison e.g "Isn't there the same problem in the English government as in the American government, in regards to international trade?"