Do you gained  performance or any sort of benefit after converting Asp.net 1.1 application to Asp.net 2.0?
476724
There's no appreciable difference in the performance of ASP.NET 2.0 versus 1.1.\n\nHowever, you need to keep pace with changes in the .NET Framework; eventually, Microsoft will stop supporting older technologies.\n\nASP.NET 2.0 has a significantly better collection of layout controls; has very useful, cross-platform navigation controls; has significantly more convenient methods of data access and display; makes it far easier to create custom components and handlers; and has simplified many of the more common controls, such as those used for input and data handling.
836374
If you built your application using VS 2005 and it is compiled as a .NET 2.0 application it will not run under .NET 1.1 even if you used only classes that are found in .NET 1.1\n\nTo solve your problem either the host needs to support .NET 2.0, or you rebuild your application using .NET 1.1 (using VS 2003 for example).\n\nAnyways, in MSDN, new classes are marked with "new to 2.0"  in case you want to know which classes are new to 2.0
798447
as much as in .net or mainframe.
471134
It's basically an invetory of clients or contact, i have developed one using c#, asp.net and sql server db :) let me know what you've go so far
497870
Professional VB.NET, 2nd Edition \nBy.. Wrox Publishers\n\nBook Description\nWritten and tested for the final release of .NET v1.0, this book explains the underlying philosophy and design of the .NET Framework and Common Language Runtime, and details the differences between Visual Basic 6 and Visual Basic .NET.\n\nVB.NET is covered virtually from start to finish: beginning with an overview of the .NET Framework, and ending with best practices for deploying .NET applications. In between, everything from database access to integration with other technologies such as XML is covered. Each of these new features are investigated in detail. You will see that VB.NET has emerged as a powerful yet easy to use language that allows developers to target the Internet just as easily as the desktop.\n\nYou will learn how to:\n\n- Develop applications and components using Visual Studio .NET\n- Effectively apply inheritance and interfaces when designing objects and components\n- Organize your code using namespaces\n- Handle errors using the Try...Catch...Finally structure\n- Access data using ADO.NET and bind controls to the underlying data sources\n- Create Windows applications and custom Windows controls\n- Interoperate with COM and ActiveX components\n- Create transactional and queuing components\n- Use .NET Remoting to exchange serialized objects between clients and servers\n- Create Windows Services\n- Use Visual Basic .NET to access information on the Web\n- Create and consume Web Services\n- Secure your applications and code using the tools provided in the .NET Framework SDK\n- Arrange your applications and libraries in assemblies and deploy them using Visual Studio .NET\n\nFrom the Publisher\nThis book is primarily aimed at experienced Visual Basic developers who are looking for an introduction to Visual Basic .NET and the .NET Framework.
57959
Side-by-side programming in .NET is creating applications that use different versions of the .NET framework.\n\nBy default, all (desktop) applications compiled with Visual Studio 2002 use version 1.0 of the .NET Framework, those compiled with Visual Studio 2003 use version 1.1 of the .NET Framework and those compiled with Visual Studio 2005 use version 2.0 of the framework.\n\nASP.NET applications, as of version 1.0 and 1.1 of the framework, required different ASP.NET IIS filters to be used on the site, depending upon the version of the framework the Web application was compiled against.  With the .NET Framework 2.0, individual Web sites can be configured to use either version of the framework through the IIS configuration tool.\n\nSide-by-side execution allows for all versions of the framework to be installed on the computer and the respective applications will use the appropriate versions.  Executable applications which don't use "breaking changes" (or those that no longer work with the newer frameworks) can modify their application configuration file to use different versions of the .NET framework.
608760
Yes. VB6 is much a better language than the lame VB.NET. I don't say this out of nothing, the proof is listed down here and they are not even a complete list. \n\n- VB.NET is often quoted as not a worthy enough to be VB6 succesor, due to its (very) poor backward compatibility, making it almost the same as new language. Even Microsoft admit this by having their motto for the language "The Difference is Obvious", yeah it's obvious since it's basically a different language, with some minor extra feature and majorly crippled.\n- VB.NET's compiled code can be decompiled easier than VB6's because it uses Intermediate Language, and not a direct comilation into Machine Code\n- VB.NET runtime is approx. 10 times larger than VB6 runtime, making  programs need a much larger memory demand. This useless overhead is a significan disadvantage.\n- It have been proven that some of the changes are NOT needed for the language to comply with either CLR (Common Language Runtime) nor .NET framework. These changes are suspected to be because the people that develops VB.NET wanted to selfishly create something that is more similar to their own language than the original Basic.\n- Most of VB6's greatest feature is missing. Some has been restored at future version of VB.NET, like the Edit And Continue feature, but until now, I haven't seen control arrays in VB.NET. There is a solution for Control Arrays substitution, that they say is simple, but in fact, the lies is obvious, it is NOT SIMPLE AT ALL, in fact they're very complicated and complex. In VB6, CA is made in design time, in VB.NET, there is no way to make it in design time, you had to create a CA in runtime, which is very not simple.\n- VB.NET IDE crashes all the time, VB6 IDE is much more stable. 10% of the time I (just) opened the VB.NET IDE, it crashes, and 60% of the succeded one crashes afterward, just after I instructed the IDE to create a new project.  Finally, it would crashes 90% of the time while I was working on the code. I have never get any crashes on VB6 eve for once in my entire life.\n- VB.NET codes are generally longer and need more work to type than the same thing done in VB6\n- There is no Data Type Currency. And there is no substitution either.\n- This new language claiming the name VB, have much difference but is too similar enough to be confusing people that have mastered the VB6.\n- VB6 to VB.NET's code converter is suck enough to introduce new bugs that is purely inexistent in the original code.\n- Converting code to VB.NET makes much more loss than profit that you can get.\n- VB.NET syntax isn't in sync with VB6's spirit.\n- VB6 is already fully Object-Oriented Language in 'concept'. Most people don't think so though, but it is 'conceptually' OOP, just because it doesn't follow some of the rules of OO doesn't mean it isn't an OO language.\n\nMS tried to patent the keyword IsNot, this is stupid, since patenting it might mean we cannot lawfully use the keyword.\n\nALL IF NOT MOST OF THESE ARGUMENTS  IS BACKED BY WIKIPEDIA IN THE ARTICLE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_Basic_.NET\nOR MSDN (Microsoft Developer Network, a.k.a Microsoft undignified way of creating money by selling products without help file in VB6, their sin is already released a bit in VB.NET by having an unhelpful help file in VB.NET)
950004
I tested all three beta versions of IE7 an installed the final version.  IE7 technology is actually copied from Linex.  An it is asbolute garbage.  \n\nThe entire program slows down your system to a crawl.  An I have broadband an it did not make a difference.  I even removed all the security out of Ie7 like phishing to scan each webpage.  An still IE7 ate up all my resources and slowed my pc almost to a hault. \n\nI removed the IE7 and you will get an automatic roll back to IE6 6.0  -- All of my speed came back.\n\nMinddoctor, France
825721
I doubt it, but if the code is simple enough it just might.  Otherwise you're just wishing for forward compatibility.  Can you switch over to an asp.net1.1 server to test it at home?
431226
Since this is your first application i would probably recommend starting with ASP.NET and C#.  It's relatively easy to learn and implement and web project within the dot net framework.   However, I do like the control and features that server side Java (JSP,Servlets,JSF,etc...) programming allows.  The down side do java is that deploying the application once it's written is somewhat cumbersome.   There's also PHP.. which i personally hate! with a passion.. but is very similar to ASP.\n\nEitherway whichever technology you use, there are plenty of example and tutorials online that can guide you through getting started.   \n\nHope this helps....
271336
Use a SSI (server side include)\n\n<!-- #Include File="file2.aspx" -->\n\nShould work for any web application that supports them including ASP .NET
1038492
Classic ASP is not, but ASP.NET uses object-oriented languages. (such as C#.NET and VB.NET)
253791
The future of .Net is looking excellent.  More and more large companies are adopting it for mission critical applications and onve most developers give it a try they never want to go back to where it is they have come from.  It's not going to go away any time soon.
618134
u can convert the VB6 file first into a Vb.net file then from Vb.net u can convert to ASP.net file with out any interface but u should run that file in VS2002 or VS2003 they u have the compiler for that....
255775
For client/server work I use vb.net. For web work I use ColdFusion. They are both easy to learn and easy to use.
35994
I don't think either is any better. It all depends on the what you want to do and what environment you want to do it in.\n\nIf you want a more open source environment you might look at JSP running on an Apache web server for example. Otherwise, you might be leaning towards ASP.Net, which is a bit more proprietary and needs some version of IIS. I think I have heard of some plugin or extension that allows ASP.Net applications to run on an Apache server. As for PHP it will run anywhere with almost no setup.\n\nAll three languages are very flexible in terms of what you can do with them.\n\nPHP has been around for a long time and has become very robust. http://www.php.net hosts a magnificent library of the built-in functions that extend the PHP framework.\n\nJSP is based off of the Java language, which can sometimes be a bear to learn, but allows for a very interactive user experience. JSP also has a strong library of work that can be easily built off of.\n\nAll anyone really talks about when talking about ASP.Net is its framework. .Net has very robust framework that allows you to easily extend user controls as well as any built-in types or methods.\n\nIn terms of documentation, PHP and JSP have really good documentation because of its user base. So it is fairly safe to say that if you can't find it in the documentation is has probably can't be done. .NET, on the other hand, has a lot of documentation, but you are better off looking through a book or some forums for help.
382120
I was pretty used to using VS6 and updated at work in the last couple of years to VS.Net.   For C++ developers, it's a nice jump to the .NET IDE that really gets them access to rapid Windows development.   \n\nBut for VB developers, it's a big change.   This is because VB 6.0 lives in such a different environment than VB.Net.   Visual Studio.NET is a TRULY object oriented platform and many of the oddities about VB were removed to put all of the languages on the same playing field.  For more on this, check out some of the migration articles on the following link.\n\nIn fact, one of .NET's main advantages is Language independence.   You can develop and compile VB, C#, C++ and many other languages from the same IDE and even in the same project. \n\nAnyway, even with VB, once you get past the big change in the environment, you'll see that .NET is very powerful when compared to VS6.0.   Things like inheritance and .Net framework calls (instead of those clunky Win API calls) make a huge difference.\n\nFinally, for web development, VS.NET provides ASP.NET, which is a big improvement over ASP.  Now you have a framework to do true structured programming for the web.  And it can be as simple as dragging a control on a form and coding behind just like VB 6.