information on the korematsu vs. United case? (please)?
494229
Korematsu v. United States 321 U.S. 760 concerned an American citizen of Japanese ancestry who was arrested for failing to obey Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34 which required all such persons to leave certain parts of the West Coast after the Japanese sneak attack on Pearl Harbor initiated war between the United States.\n\nJustice Black, wrote the majority opinion which held that the order was constitutional and that Korematsu had properly been arrested for failing to obey it.\n\n"He was excluded because we are at war with the Japanese Empire, because the properly constituted military authorities feared an invasion of our West Coast and felt constrained to take proper security measures, because they decided that the military urgency of the situation demanded that all citizens of Japanese ancestry be segregated from the West Coast temporarily, and finally, because Congress, reposing its confidence in this time of war in our military leaders -- as inevitably it must -- determined that they should have the power to do just this. There was evidence of disloyalty on the part of some, the military authorities considered that the need for action was great, and time was short. We cannot -- by availing ourselves of the calm perspective of hindsight -- now say that at that time these actions were unjustified. "
159043
Read this page\n\nhttp://www.soi.wide.ad.jp/soi-asia/pkg1/06/48.html
339775
This is a listing of briefs for cases currently on the Docket.  The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR case is an employment discrimination case.  I've also posted a link to the latest slip opinions.\n\nhttp://www.abanet.org/publiced/preview/briefs/home.html\nhttp://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html
63287
There is quite a history on them. Please check these out:\nhttp://www.corporatecrimefighters.com/html/unum_s_claim_cheating_initiati.html\nhttp://www.unumprovidentlawsuit.com/\nhttp://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=12569
601909
Koizumi is a total prat! He really should stop visiting Yasukuni - it's not like it makes any difference to most Japanese people...!!\n\nIt's totally true that only a few people who are 'commemorated' there were actually convicted war criminals - the bulk of the soldiers were perfectly normal men, and it's also important to remember that until certain insane actions in China the Japanese military actually had a very good reputation!  In other words, they were NOT all a bunch of psychos...!\n\nYou must also remember that Yasukuni shrine doesn't actually have any human remains in it, so if Koizumi WANTS to pray for lost soldiers he could do it somewhere else! He can't have another shrine made though, because it's against the constitution for the government to have anything to do with religion - ANOTHER reason for him to stop going! One or two regional courts in Japan have actually accused Koizumi of breaking the constitution (if that's the right way to describe it?!) by making a public display of visiting a religious place, but nothing has actually been DONE to stop him!\n\nAnother important point is that until the current head priest took charge of Yasukuni there were NO convicted war criminals represented at the shrine!! Since then the Emperor of Japan has never visited the shrine, although he did before. (I don't know if he can hold out if the government puts pressure on him though - he's just a grinning puppet!) And this head priest REFUSES to remove the criminals - which would actually solve all the problems, because that's what all the fuss is about!!
167007
Hi, check the site below it didnt have a huge section on Judge Adams.  Hope this helps.
207866
This link might be able to help if not look up the Georgetown University website http://www.supremecourtus.gov/
7634
I heard this was a rumor from his trip to Mexico. Apparently, however, the suit is still in court and is pending a verdict. The real truths will come out on the stand. Link below is to a TheSmokingGun article describing the suit with filed documents.
489014
Check this out, this will clarify everything to you: \n\nhttp://www.johntreed.com/Kiyosaki.html\n\nPlease let me know.
850031
I can give you a starting point and you can decide how much research you want to do. Minneapolis Minnesota installed the same system. It ran for about a year before someone appealed the ticket high enough that the cameras had to be turned off. So there is "case law" out there somewhere.
894823
This can't be answered without more information. What kind of judgment, what state, when and under what circumstances was the judgment issued.
883331
try this http://www.japantimes.co.jp/
649231
About facts on the Supreme Court,check\n\nhttp://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0875894.html\n\nhttp://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,622,00.html\n\nhttp://www.constitutionfacts.com/Supreme_ct/Supreme_ct.htm
961360
This is a difficult case with no easy answers. \n\nThe lawyer who represented Ms Campbell in court sums up the other side's case: \n"This was not a decision about custody. It was a decision on whether Mr Rana had acted improperly by violating the court order made at the Court of Session in Scotland in June last year." \n\nFor arguments for both sides: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/highlands_and_islands/6192406.stm\n\ncc
807487
i knew a company in Taiwan that sold some goods to a USA company for about 40k USD. the USA company did not pay. they traveled to north carolina and took that company to court in the USA. the judge threw the case out because he said the Taiwan company did not have a USA office and they had no rights in the USA. but that was that case. yours maybe different.
935573
Sorry, I don't understand what you're asking for, please add some information to clarify.\n\n\nOk, how about the topic of " The Dominance of Japanese Management in the World in the 80's and it's Decline" or "The possible effects of a South American Trade Organization on NAFTA and the EU"\nor "EU trade restrictions on US agriculture"  or "The effects of OPEC on US production/trade/economy"  or "Ramifications of China's lack of enforcement of Copyright laws on US producers" or "US investment potential in Vietnam since Normalization in Relations"\n\nas to sites....search using google, dogpile, answers.com, yahoo, msn, Jeeves....all have different priorities of which documents will come up first....takes research, any way you cut it.
205535
I think you'll find all the information you need at this link:\n\nhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=372&invol=335