what is a pampas deer in south america?
480289
Pampas Deer\nFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia\nPampas Deer\nScientific classification\nKingdom: Animalia\nPhylum: Chordata\nClass:         Mammalia\nOrder:         Artiodactyla\nFamily: Cervidae\nGenus:         Ozotocerus\nSpecies: B. dichotomus\nBinomial name   Blastocerus dichotomus\n(Linnaeus, 1758)\n\nThe Pampas Deer, Ozotocerus bezoarticus, is a deer species from South America. It is found in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay.\n\nPampas deers live only in open habitats, like Pampas and Cerrado. They are brown colored when adults. Adult males have narrow antlers with two or three branches and they also have scent glands on their hooves to mark their territories. Fawns are spotted.\n\nsource:\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pampas_Deer\n\nFor photo\nhttp://www.arthurgrosset.com/mammals/pampasdeer.html
1056851
The Alpaca (Vicugna pacos) is a domesticated breed of South American camel-like ungulates, derived from the wild vicuña. It resembles a sheep in appearance, but is larger in size, and has a long erect neck.
49442
the andes mountain range in south america, most of it is in chile.
1010425
Argentina Argentina Argentina
1172083
Grew up on an Ohio, USA dairy farm.  My dad is now into raising beef cattle.\n\nI hear Argentina is well-known for its beef farms.
206708
they are the same thing as mule deer and you can find them in any of the western states. generally in the Rockies
929482
Anywhere in Central America. They seem to change their appearance with different locations, so whatever look you want, you can get. Make sure you buy yourself a cow first, and leave it in an open feild. Try to catch the chupacabra feeding on it, and snag it. If you miss it, ignore the blow-fly larvae, because if anything causes you to disbelieve in the chupacabra, your chance at catching it will be gone forever. \n\nGood luck, although I don't think Chupacabras are fond of rodents. They'd better be  really big, juicy ones...big enough to mistake for a cow...
201393
It is a portguese name for a top female Brazillian model.\n\nThe english spelling is gazelle which is a deer like animal with antlers.
825156
The Amazon! In South America. Plenty of animals and plants. Oh, and natives! :-)
464728
Well, the GABI (Great American Biotic Interchange) went both ways, and several families of mammals from North America came to South America, and viceversa. However, only few native South Americans remain today in North America (NA), whereas many originally Holarctic families are thriving in South America (SA) at present. \n\nThe above answerer has outlined the three major "strata" defined by GG Simpson for the mammals of SA. The "original" South American mammals before the GABI included marsupials (shared with Australia, but forming a distinct cohort with different families) but also the exclusively South American xenarthrans (although there is a possible fossil anteater from Europe), and the Caviomorph rodents (closely related to the hystricognathous African rodents). In addition, there were some carnivores that had made it from NA. \n\nAfter the Panama land bridge appeared, the GABI was intense. North and South American faunas mixed and they appear to have coexisted for a long time. \nThe subsequent Pleistocene extinctions involved groups of both origins, but the South American natives were more intensely affected. Among the hypotheses to explain this,  interspecific competition has been mentioned, but also climatic changes. \nFirst of all, direct competition is _very_ difficult to prove, and more so with respect to fossil remains from strata that may not be exactly coeval. A more recent and preferred explanation involves a little paleoclimatology. \n** During the glaciations (and other stressful periods), South American conditions were more benign, because the continent is closer to the Equator, whereas environments in NA were much harsher, facilitating the extinction of the South American immigrants, along with many native North American giant forms. \n**In addition, the Central American corridor, which had been at first a savanna-like environment that permitted passage, later in the Pleistocene became more like a tropical forest. Then many cursorial (running) animals that inhabited open areas were unable to "cross the bridge". The giant ground sloths and glyptodonts were trapped in NA, and when climate and vegetation kept changing toward colder and drier conditions, became extinct.\n\nAnimals left from this: \nAmong the original South American natives, only the xenarthrans (sloths, armadillos, and anteaters) and marsupials (opossums)[early inhabitants], and the caviomorph rodents (originally derived from their African relatives) [second stratum colonizers] are alive today. The immensely diverse native ungulates went extinct, along with the representatives of the megafauna (giant sloths, glyptodonts, etc). At least one species of armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) is expanding its range in NA today, and the opossums (I remember Didelphis virginiana, not sure if there are others) are well established there. Caviomorph rodents also occur in NA (porcupines, genus Erethizon), but are mostly confined to Central America. \nThese are the South American contributions to North American fauna. In contrast, about 50% of the South American mammal genera have North American origin.\n\nWith respect to birds, at least the Passeriformes Suboscines are South American in origin, but I have no idea _when_ they colonized NA. They include the Tyrannidae (tyrant flycatchers). Other birds with Neotropical origin are the hummingbirds (Trochiliformes or Apodiformes).\n\n---------------------\nUpdate:\nMmm... I’m not sure what you call “non-speed strategies”. Predators? Running forms such as ungulates? There were many native ungulates in South America and they went extinct; also many marsupial predators such as the marsupial sabertooth “cat”  that also disappeared. Many caviomorph rodents are cursorial (capybaras, agoutis, etc).\nI would relate it more to size. Size _is_ a constraint because large animals have different energetic balance and need large amounts of food and room. And those went extinct in both co
812289
The easy answer is that the two longest countries in South America are Chile and Argentina.\n\nHowever, it may depend on what specifically you mean by "longest."  Chile is definitely the longest, north to south; but Brazil is actually longer than Argentina, thought it does not look so because it is also quite wide.
766641
brazil then argentina
533242
The Amazon - It is about 4,000 miles from start to finish, winding its way through most of South America.
399332
MEXICO, SPAIN, and most of South American countries but Brazil
662713
1.  Rio de Janeiro, Brazil - Serra da Mantiqueira and Serra do Mar.\n\n2.  The Andes (that runs all on the West side of most of South America, so there are more than five in here alone, Peru being the center.\n\n3.  Mt. Aconcagua - Argentina, South America\n\n4.  Pico de Orizaba  & Sierra Madre - Mexico City\n\nhttp://www.peakware.com/areas.html
1124507
The only badger species in the New World is the American badger, Taxidea taxus, which is restricted to North America and doesn't get any further south than Northern Mexico.\n\nThere are no badgers in South America (including Brazil).
39948
If we don't kill some deer by hunting there will be more of them to eat our corn crops and get hit by automobiles on the roads and highways.\nWoops, you say against.  Well, nobody wants to kill Bambi.  The best agruemnt against is that deer are creatures with a right to live.  Killing one requires a better excuse than wanting a trophy to hang on the wall.  If you kill a deer, you will need to process the meat or pay to have that job done (and it is messy unless you have the skill and tools of a professional butcher).  If you want to get the full benefit of the hunt, you will also have to tan the hide or pay to have that done.