what is the significance of nelsons number (111)?
489955
All triplets in all bases are multiples of 111 in that base, therefore the number represented by 111 in a particular base is the only triplet that can ever be prime. "111" is not prime in base ten, but is prime in base two, where 111 = 7 in base ten.
158146
This is the reason why we (Jehovah's Witnesses) take the 144,000 number (as mentioned in Revelation 14) as a literal amount:\n\n***Why do Jehovah’s Witnesses take the number 144,000 mentioned in the book of Revelation literally and not symbolically?***\n\nThe apostle John wrote: “I heard the number of those who were sealed, a hundred and forty-four thousand.” (Revelation 7:4) In the Bible, the phrase “those who were sealed” refers to a group of individuals who are chosen from among mankind to rule with Christ in heaven over the coming Paradise earth. (2 Corinthians 1:21, 22; Revelation 5:9, 10; 20:6) Their number, 144,000, is understood literally for several reasons. One is found in the immediate context of Revelation 7:4.\n\nAfter the apostle John was told in vision about this group of 144,000 individuals, he was shown another group. John describes this second group as “a great crowd, which no man was able to number, out of all nations and tribes and peoples and tongues.” This great crowd refers to those who will survive the coming “great tribulation,” which will destroy the present wicked world.—Revelation 7:9, 14.\n\nNote, however, the contrast that John draws between verses 4 and 9 of Revelation chapter 7. He states that the first group, “those who were sealed,” has a definite number. However, the second group, “a great crowd,” is without a definite number. With that in mind, it is logical to take the number 144,000 to be literal. If the number 144,000 were symbolic and referred to a group that is actually numberless, the force of the contrast between those two verses would be lost. Thus, the context strongly indicates that the number 144,000 must be taken literally.\n\nVarious Bible scholars, past and present, reached the same conclusion—that is, the number is literal. For instance, in commenting on Revelation 7:4, 9, British lexicographer Dr. Ethelbert W. Bullinger observed some 100 years ago: “It is the simple statement of fact: a definite number in contrast with the indefinite number in this very chapter.” (The Apocalypse or “The Day of the Lord,” page 282) More recently, Robert L. Thomas, Jr., professor of New Testament at The Master’s Seminary in the United States, wrote: “The case for symbolism is exegetically weak.” He added: “It is a definite number [at 7:4] in contrast with the indefinite number of 7:9. If it is taken symbolically, no number in the book can be taken literally.”—Revelation: An Exegetical Commentary, Volume 1, page 474.\n\nSome argue that since Revelation contains highly symbolic language, all numbers found in this book, including the number 144,000, must be symbolic. (Revelation 1:1, 4; 2:10) That conclusion, though, is clearly not correct. Granted, Revelation contains numerous symbolic numbers, but it also includes literal numbers. For instance, John speaks of “the twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.” (Revelation 21:14) Clearly, the number 12 mentioned in this verse is literal, not symbolic. Further, the apostle John writes about “the thousand years” of Christ’s reign. That number is also to be taken literally, as a careful consideration of the Bible shows. (Revelation 20:3, 5-7) Hence, whether a number in Revelation is to be taken literally or symbolically depends on its background and setting.\n\nThe conclusion that the number 144,000 is literal and refers to a limited number of individuals, a relatively small group when compared with the “great crowd,” also harmonizes with other Bible passages. For instance, later in the vision that the apostle John receives, the 144,000 are described as those who “were bought from among mankind as firstfruits.” (Revelation 14:1, 4) The expression “firstfruits” refers to a small representative selection. Also, while Jesus was on earth, he spoke about those who will rule with him in his heavenly Kingdom and called them a “little flock.” (Luke 12:32; 22:29)
1025956
Ten is a good round number.
313089
I don't know the exact number but I know what you are talking about.  I had that number.  I got it from www.chrisbrownworld.com.  I'm not sure if it is still there though.
896371
It is now called Roentgenium 111. Look it up in any search engine.
1032089
discovery of the number 0?
496368
MIGHT BE NELSON EDDIE
826399
123 a big big news for you!...\n:)! http://www.osoq.com/funstuff/extra/extra04.asp?strName=123
1073255
Lots of numbers show up frequently, especially when you are looking for them.  This is a relatively common phenomenon that is experienced by quite a lot of people.\n\n1024 is a very commonly occuring number because it is 2^10\n1023 = 2^10 - 1\n\nThere is a movie called Pi, it is about a guy who becomes obsessed looking for a particular "216" number as it is called.  After I watched the movie, I've noticed that I see the number 216 quite frequently.
450487
DanTheMan(and some number if its not available just like that) example: DanTheMan3922
1019856
I saw the number 23 on a Dr.Pepper soda can. Does that mean anything. I don't have the number 23 in anything like phone, ss number, ect.
992444
38822.06\n\nDon't forget the significant figures.
342459
Since there are seven ones, it will count up to 7 and then back down - 1234567654321.\n\n 1111111\nx1111111\n-------------\n0000001111111\n0000011111110\n0000111111100\n0001111111000\n0011111110000\n0111111100000\n1111111000000\n-------------\n1234567654321
478761
100,000,000,000,001 or one could give it to you in scientifi notation with a rounding error 10.0 E13
611725
I thinkit's more the number significance than the amount.\n\n12 is a power number....
61276
100101111\nThat is:\n256+32+8+4+2+1
216459
2.7182\nLook up Napier's constant (that's what it is called).