Actually I want to know that can we completely destroy the water ? Is there any absolute way to destroy water?
481909
if you had a bunch of antimatter - anti-protons, electrons, and neutrons, they would annhilate with the water, destroying both but producing a whole bunch of energy
453770
yes.  i have done it with boiling water (trust me.. i had no choice).  they died immediately.
143491
Not using present technology, no. Water is an oxidised form of hydrogen. It is chemically very stable and that makes it effectively impossible to extract energy from it.\n\nBy putting a lot of energy into water it is possible to produce hydrogen gas that can later be used as fuel. However that does not make water a fuel source. Far more fuel is needed to produce the hydrogen than is ever recovered when the hydrogen is burned.\n\nIt is concievable at some future date that the development of controllable fusion technology will enable th euse of water as a fuel source, but not until then.
297283
Not pure carbon in pure water, no.  Don't believe me, try sticking a pencil lead (graphite is pure carbon, not actually lead) into a glass of water and see if it dissolves.\n\nBut carbon will dissolve in some solutions.\n\nAs an aside, you think the guy above me might be trying too hard?  A more concise answer is usually preferable.
785932
Sorry, but creativity and destruction are inextricably linked, especially where humans are concerned.\n\nThe only way to do it would be to destroy the destroyers, and that would pretty much defeat the purpose, wouldn't it?
794246
Absolutely.  In fact, there have been several different approaches, including zapping little pellets with a monster laser (NOVA), which are then immersed in water.  These minuscule nuclear bombs fuse and release their energy into the water, creating steam and turning turbines.\n\nThe most promising method, however, is a fusion reactor; a magnetic bottle which traps plasma.  Fusion occurs when the electromagnetic forces of nuclei (which are positive) are overcome.  In order to get nuclei, atoms are injected into the reactor and brought to immense temperatures.  The individual atoms, which are neutral, become so energetic that the electrons are stripped from the nuclei, creating plasma.  Plasma is simply free electrons (negatively charged and unbounded to a nucleus) and the positively charged nuclei.  Because these are positively and negatively charged, the plasma is contained within magnetic field lines.  This is the proverbial "magnetic bottle".\n\nThe nuclei smash into each other, creating helium nuclei and excess neutrons.  These neutrons are EXTREMELY energetic (14 MeV), and are neutrally charged.  Therefore, these neutrons zip right past the magnetic field lines.  The charged plasma remains, continuing the fusion process; and the neutrons are captured in water, where elastic collisions with H2O molecules transfers the energy from the neutrons to the water, heating the water, turning it to steam, and turning the turbines.\n\nThere are a couple of major problems.  First, the sun is very big and very hot.  Getting similar temperatures and pressures on Earth is next to impossible.  Although the energy released is several orders of magnitude greater than the energy put in when the process is going a full capacity, getting it started has been very difficult.  However, through TFTR and the new ITER, already the plasmas have generated more energy than were used to start the process.  This is a big step.\n\nAlso, the magnetic bottle and the plasma can experience some strange instabilities and wave functions.  Any time a harmonic resonance-like phenomena occurs, the fusion can break down, the plasma cools, and the process slows or stops.  As the test reactors continue to gather data, these phenomena are better understood.\n\nFinally, those 14 MeV neutron zip through the magnetic bottle and the water, and interact with impurities in the concrete and building materials, creating radioactive waste.  This waste is not insignificant - huge amounts of concrete becomes low-level waste.  Low level waste is NOT a measure of how dangerous it is - this stuff can be very dangerous - but it will only remain dangerous for about 100 years or so.  It's not the stuff that remains deadly for thousands of years.\n\nSo solve the instabilities, be able to sustain a plasma and reaction long enough to become self-sustaining, and be prepared for the low level waste, and fusion will become an almost unlimited energy supply.
696985
In conclusion we found the water to bead up like a dome until the increase in mass/weight overcame the Penny's ability to hold the water. Then the water ran onto the table across the floor. There was a bare electrical wire which the water shorted out and it caught fire, burning the building down. After the Fire Department left, we decide never to try this stupid experiment again!\nYou may want to reword it some, this this best I could do from what you wrote.
1016830
Water wastage will never be a problem, EVER.\nWe have abundant resources, and if those ever began to dry up, which they won't because of rain collection, we have desalinization plants that filter the salt out of ocean water and purify it so it is drinkable.\n\nBy the way I love that word, "wastage."
412868
Water isn't important for everything. It's only important for living things such as plants, human beings, and small bacteria. Water is the one and only thing that could give you energy and rehydrate you completely. Water as the last person said has 2 hydrogen atoms and 1 oxygen atom. Those gases are helpful for your body to function.
1046638
i don't really know about this but i'm fairly sure i can give a better answer than lrisjqoijgjr  \n\nyou could probably use a surfactant to break down the molecular attraction between the water molecules but this would leave pollution through the path of whatever you were using to travel through the water\n\nbut yeah not really practical but better than uingnpds
887802
I sure hope this is just a paper exercise and is not going to be actually performed.  Sodium hydride will react very exothermically with water and is extremely hazardous.
381019
is this limited to the 4 main elements? water is so powerful so....
1182440
The polarity is what makes the atoms in the H2O molecule stick together if not for that then there would be no water, meaning no life except bacteria, and no us. I think that is pretty important. \n Also it can dissolve most anything. \nThere is high latent heat of fusion  meaning it needs a lot of heat removal before it changes to ice= does not freeze very quickly therefore giving us drinkable water and grow crops and everything else. \nThere is high heat capacity. IT needs a lot of heat or energy before it vaporizes therefore it does not vaporize quickly and turn in steam during hot seasons and months leaving us again with no water.\nThere is high surface tension. Therefore it allows most things on it to float since water has a high density. Ice can float on it during freezing seasons. If ice did not float it would go to the bottom and freeze all the marine life like fish and plants.
388103
course.People are allergic to water.Anything is possible
1108709
Safe to drink... or safe to be around in the presence of an electrical current?\n\nWell zero conductivity would be ideal, because it would be evidence of zero ion presence in the water.\n\nHowever the water could be very conductive and still be "safe" to consume. Salt (Na-Cl) for instance mixed into the water would make turn the water into an ionic solution. It is therefore now has conductivity. But as we all know... we can consume salt water "safely" if it is consumed at appropriate amounts.
154228
Humans doesn't have the ability to destroy the atmosphere. We can only polute it. The only way to destroy the atmosphere is to blow up planet earth.
245648
yes water can go bad according to this link http://science.howstuffworks.com/question201.htm