Shouldn't the Air and Space Museum be empty?
491553
Only if airheads go to visit....smile\n\nAnd no...I was not referring to you....lol
1178772
Because they don't exist, and they'd have to think of a new excuse to keep things like this quiet:\nhttp://www.area51zone.com/aircraft/index.shtml
1061904
You have confused.space air will not touch the earth.
473598
LOL \n\nNope, it's been deserted for years!
724152
Airplanes depend on air for their lift. The atmosphere ends well short of the moon.
52366
Estimates of about 35 million pieces of debris are common.  Of these about 100,000 are in the square centimeter or larger size category, and NASA routinely tracks about 8,000.  People are good at throwing stuff away.  Shame we did not throw ot far enough away.\nI have personally viewed at least four or five of the biggest pieces.
19572
leave yes, but not forever.  then i could come back & visit & see how much space debris & space trash is floating in our upper stratosphere.  then i could appreciate how untrash the new place looks.\n\n\nby the way, do U really have monkey feet?
332802
Actually, There is no such thing as a true vacuum...period!\n(exerpt from a previous answer)\nContrary to popular belief, empty space is not empty, and it is certainly not a vacuum. In fact, a true vacuum has never been created, anywhere, where the atomic count and therefore air pressure is zero.\nresearch it, its true.\n"Empty" space actually contains an average of 1 hydrogen atom for every 32 cubic centimeters of space, this data is per NASA.\n\nIn our own Milky Way, space is more dense with 1 hydrogen atom for every 1 cubic centimeter.\n\nOne day the misinformation of space as a vacuum will finally die out.\n\n\nspread the knowledge
68395
Perhaps, but not visiting us. Think about it. Why did flying saucers and abductions only start to be reported after man invented flying machines? Not many claims in history of aliens and what not. Its because UFOs are most likely classified test vehicles that the airforce is using. We know for sure those exist and where they are stored.
937381
The Shuttles built were:\nEnterprise (not able to go into space, used for training purposes, currently at Edwards AFB)\nColumbia (destroyed)\nChallenger (destroyed)\nplus the three still in service.  They are to be retired within the next four years.  One will unquestionably go to the Smithsonian's Air & Space Museum.  One may be left on display at Cape Canaveral.  The final one may wind up at some very lucky museum elsewhere in the USA.
360378
Well... Let's see...\n\nWe know nothing is there, and we brought back 842 pounds of Moon rocks. Ain't that enough?\n\nBesides, why should we do it, if no other country is doing it?
983421
no, you cannot get on base unless you have an ID or a temporary pass (meaning someone who has an ID signed for you to get on).  if you know someone in the military you could probably get on with a temporary pass (i did a number of times after 9/11 when i was just dating my husband and had no ID).  if they haven't seen the star of india, take them on that.  that was really interesting.  i'd also check and see if balboa park had a maritime museum (or if there is one in SD... i don't know if there is, sorry).  i know that balboa has an aviation one (it's kind of seperated from all the other museums so most people don't know it's there)... planes are pretty cool to young boys too, so that is hopefully a viable alternative to them.
170296
Empty vessels seldom last long
645192
No, there's nothing really to see on the moon, and the environment is a bit harsh to do much of anything without a spacesuit.\n\nMaybe in a few hundred years, we will have more advanced technology that lets us visit other places more easily.
357358
yeah men, pointing itself, no dust over the legs on landing, no proves at all, and we already know that with the tecnology of the 60 it will be a surprise if they could be able just to hit the moon with the rocket, actually, many years later still Nasa was proving materials to suport speed over MATCH, and plus the space clothes...for God sake...really...the most expensive and bad movie ever...
627134
Actually, There is no such thing as a true vacuum...Period!\nA true vacuum has never been created, anywhere, where the atomic count is zero.\nThere is always atomic content left to fill the "vacuous" space. No one has ever been able to creat a true vacuum.\n\nContrary to popular belief, empty space is not empty, and it is certainly not a vacuum. \nresearch it, its true.\n"Empty" space actually contains an average of 1 hydrogen atom for every 32 cubic centimeters of space, this data is per NASA.\n\nIn our own Milky Way, space is more dense with 1 hydrogen atom for every 1 cubic centimeter.\n\nSo to answer your question, EMs have never been propagated through a true vacuum that we know of.\n\nOne day the misinformation of space, or anything else, as a true vacuum will finally die out.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/vacuum...\n\n\nspread the knowledge
1028401
The space is endless.If it has any end,man need many years to find it.good bye.