can anyone tell me the form used for each word inthis sentence  THE TRAIN LEAVES AT 11.00 TOMORROW?
476357
THE (defining article)\nTRAIN (noun)\nLEAVES (verb)\nAT (preposition)\n11 (noun)\nTOMORROW (adverb)
159138
about 1.5 hours - try www.thetrainline.com
1166078
I don't know the origin of this peculiarity of usage It may have something to do with the origin of community transportation vs. individual transportation, but I'm not certain. The following statements are correct:\n\nShe is on the bus.\nShe is on the train.\nShe is on the airplane.\nBUT\nShe is in the car.\nShe is on the bicycle. (This one makes sense, as she is not literally inside the bicycle)\n\nIn some cases of simple location, both forms would be acceptable. For example:\n\nAfter looking everywhere, they finally found her on the train.\nAfter looking everywhere, they finally found her in the train\n\nAlthough to my ear, "on" sounds more correct. The second sentence suggests they found her IN the train, as opposed to on top of the train, under the train, etc.\n\nIf I had to guess, I would say that the "on" form comes from colloquial usage for public transportation - "getting on board". Therefore, it should generally be used *unless* the final sentence, as read, could cause some confusion.\n\nFor example:\n\nShe is sitting on the train. This could be used to describe a woman on the roof of a train, legs dangling over the side.\n\nShe is sitting in the train. Pretty unambiguous.\n\nThe sentence "She is reading on a train" suggests to me an abbreviation of the thought "She is reading while (located) on a train." - hence, the "on" form of the sentence.\n\nDon't take this as authoritative. In fact, don't even take the grammatical "rule" being described as authoritative. It's a usage rule, not a grammar one - the same as "I'm engaged to a woman" as opposed to "I'm engaged with a woman". One is obviously natural in English, but both are technically grammatically correct. (I believe I read the second usage as a common error made by German speakers of English as a second language.)
467223
left\n\nExamples:\n\nI will leave. or I am leaving. -> I left.  or  I have left.\n\nWill he leave? -> Has he left?
54153
The first and third are correct. The first is in future tense. Still acceptable depending on context of the sentence.
1137143
http://www.edufind.com/english/grammar/
39284
la proxima              proxima\neste fin de semana      this weekend\nsaber                   to know\nsalir                   to leave\nhay                     it has
462745
It's me.\nOlek?\nYeah, Olek.  Are you going to work out today?\nWork out?  No, I really can't.  The tram's already coming.                           Sorry, but not today.
1052806
1 PM\n\nThe Brits are 6 hours ahead of you.\n\nYour time is (GMT -6).
75071
try\nhttp://babelfish.altavista.com/tr
634829
english next time please
1014071
The 2nd sentence is correct and very formal; there is something like an old subjunctive form hidden in it.\nThe 1st sentence is (informally) not incorrect and could be found in British English.
388331
The interrogative sentences can be:\n\n(1) Is Man Mohan Singh 12th P.M. of India?\n(2) Is not Man Mohan Singh the 12th P.M. of India?\n(3) Is 12th P.M. of India, Man Mohan Singh?\n\nYou can choose, whichever form suits you or your teacher, if it relates to your studies.
899838
1, [TIME]-I'm living on borrowed time.\n                 Video games require such an expenditure of time.\n[LIFE]- My marriage was just a pit stop on the road to Mandalay.\n            I don't know  what lies ahead on the road to success.\n[PEOPLE]- She withered away in sadness after he left her.\n             She wrapped her arms around me like a vine on a\n             trellis.\n[UNDERSTANDING]- I preach, I rant, but you just don't see!\n                    In order to understand relativity, you must first visualize yourself on a stationary boat where the shore is always floating away from you.\n\n2. Cheer up! \n    Nobody knows you when you're down and out.\n            Your frown brings me down.   I was up $300, but I left a loser.       Better put in some oil.  You're down 2 quarts. \nIt may rain too much in Seattle, but there is an up side to living there.     Don't look down on me just because I am poor.\n\n3. [TIME]  I sit alone writing songs while time rolls past my window.\n    The past is in the graveyard, the future is on the red eye to the pearly gates.\n[COMMUNICATION]  She funnelled her hopes and dreams  into a  pint bottle and threw them overboard.  \nThey hoped the march would send the president  a message.\n[ANGER] He was so pertubed he nearly boiled over with vitriol, and steam was pouring out of his ears.\nShe was a seething cauldron of molten lava, waiting  for a chance to erupt.\nI hope these are what you were looking for.\n\nCheers.
477527
From 12:00:01 to 16:59:59 you wish someone "good afternoon."\n\nAfter that you wish someone "good evening" as a greeting and "good night" if they are leaving.\n\nThere are exceptions to this, but this covers 95% of the cases.
673387
1st is correct.\n\n2nd is, though not incorrect, just plain akward. You are saying "what is the best time" that's like asking if you should leave at 1 pm, 3 pm or 6 pm for Thailand. But then you use the word "travel" and not "leave/drive/fly" - so the whole sentence is akward. Don't use it.
956823
Either *could* be grammatically correct, but they have different meanings.  In the first example, you are suggesting that travel is possible, but not definite.  "I don't definitely travel tomorrow; I might wait until the next day" is a grammatical sentence.  In the second example, you are clearly saying that you will not travel--it is definite.\n\nBut the first version is awkward, even if that is the meaning you intend.  It would be far better to say, "I may not travel," if that's what you mean.\n\nGood luck!!