how long do u have to sue for a dog bite?
492352
One year to take action.  I am a mail carrier and was attacked and bitten by two dogs simultaneously.  Get a lawyer thats the best way no head aches.
1135959
If suit has been filed within the time frame (usually 2 years for most torts) then the statute of limitations does not apply.  You have been served have notice and must respond within the time stated on service of process or you will lose by default.  Check with your insurance you may have coverage for this.
514346
Ernie, why on Earth should this person go to that law firm if the verdict was for the defense?  This gal asking the question is seeking to be a plaintiff.\n\nIn any event, were you hurt in the accident?  If not then you don't have a lawsuit.  If you were hurt, go to any reputable personal injury lawyer in your area.  You don't need someone who's done a tanning bed case.  This is basic personal injury law.  Go to www.martindale.com to find a listing for lawyers in your area.
449409
I haven't seen the tape, but in order to sue you need either to have your own interests harmed, or you need to be suing under a law which grants a private right of action to sue to enforce the law.  Animal cruelty statutes are usually criminal, and have to be enforced by the district attorney or county prosecutor, not by suit of a private individual.
394319
Most states a report has to be filed within 24-72hrs of the accident otherwise no claim has to be paid.  This allows evidence, documentaion, etc to be collected.  It also allows there to be shown a connection between an accident and the injury.
1131585
I don't mean to upset your apple cart, but if another person's dog caused injuries that severe on the premises of a vet, you should not be handling the case yourself. You should be haveing an experienced personal injury atty at least review your case. Odds are, you will expend your one opportunity to get redress in court and come out with much less than you are entitled to. This sounds like one case where "going on the cheap" is a very bad idea.
816127
The burden of proof is on the prosecution. However if this is a realistic dog-beating then I imagine it could be a messy deal in court. You would have to prove it somehow that you used a prop. As far as the legal issues animal cruelty is a big crime and the fines and jail time are not nearly strict enough.
888991
Well... \n\nfor negligence, you need 4 things\n1.  duty\n2.  breach\n3.  causation\n4.  damages\n\nyou dont have any damages... excpet maybe the price of the chocolate.  what would you sue for?
448354
It's nice to know that there are people liek you that care about animals and are willing to do something about it.  That being said, personally, I would not leave them a message, I'm not sure of the legal implications, but I don't think it's the best way to go about fixing the issue.  If they are abusing the dogs, the chances are they won't stop if you leave them a message - they will probably just take out the anger on the dogs, or do it someplace where it's not visible.  Worst case scenario, they'll find out it's you, and you could have safety or legal problems.  \n\nYou could always contact one of the major animal groups to ask them the best way to proceed, as I'm sure they have effective guidelines.  If they don't give you the advice you need, the second best move (or maybe the best?) would be to contact one of the animal protection groups at a local law school.  The advantage is that they are small, and always want to get their hands on "live" cases.  Here's a link to such an organization, the ALDF (Animal League Defense Fund): http://www.aldf.org/windows/chapters.html\n\nI think it's so terrible that people do this to their animals...
782638
Your sign MUST read....Dogs running free!!\n This will depend on the exact circumstances of the incident. The following should be used as a guide only for possible scenarios as each case will be considered individually.\nIf you SET your dog onto an intruder and the person suffers injury then you may  face prosecution and the the court could order the dog to be kept under control/destroyed (dangerous dog not under control) \nIf an intruder breaks in whilst you are out and is attacked by the dog then it is unlikely that you would face the need to defend a possible court order. \nThere is also civil liability to consider in any damage that your dog may cause. It should be noted that most dogs will simply bark at an intruder but will not follow with a physical attack.By placing the sign with the wording *a vicious dog* you are admitting you own a dangerous dog.
587983
It depends on how much money is involved.  a friend of mine has a lawsuit going and its been two years already
889882
Make sure the neighbor notifies his household insurer FORTHWITH or the insurer will refuse indemnification.\n\nYou would probably have to sue to get more than out-of-pocket expenses. And your legal costs might leave you with less than you spent.\n\nIf the neighbor refuses to cooperate, you will have to see that he is served with a summons or the statute of limitations (varies by state; in Minnesota the statute of limitations for dog bites is six years) could run. Two years is a not uncommon limit -- but the insurance policy will have a much shorter limit, perhaps just a few days, for notification.\n\nYou can Google <dog bite statute limitations + [your state]> and probably find out what the limitation is.
15268
It would depend on the medical procedure on how long you can "sue" them
523606
STOP! before retaining an attorney $$$, consider contacting the business and informing them of the incident and request the name of their ins. provider. Often they make reasonable offers. (in this case doc bill plus $1000)\n\nOnly if they refuse and your injuries/damages exceed your states max. small claims award by $1000 should you even consider discussing the matter with an attorney. \n\nUnless you were injured and treated professionally (have a bill) your case is weak. Damages for pain and suffering with this type of occurance will be aprox. $1000 unless you can prove the incident was the result of negligence or malice. \n\nIf you hire an attorney it is likely there won't be enough money left to pay the bill for your care.
999589
sign outside a vet/taxidermist\n"either way you get your dog back!"
1170656
Yes. You can talk to your town about it. Most towns have an animal control officer, who can deal with it. Of course the things to remember here are:\n1) It's not the dogs' fault. They probably haven't been cared for or trained properly.\n2) You can always threaten the guy with legal action, but of course you'll have to live next to him so...
1035508
The statute only specifically mentions insurance companies and lawsuits for injuries generally have a 6 year limitation. It is unclear from the statutes if it s possible to sue someone whose insurance did not cover an accident, especially if the person did not properly request payment from the insurer. I would speak to a lawyer about it.