There as a Texas law past in 1989  SB1814 usually found posted on plastic milk crates. what is it?
494228
Texas SB 1814 "requires third party consultants for any post conviction of DNA evidence requested by the prosecution."  Why you see it on a milk carton is beyond me.  Are you sure you have the phrase "SB 1814" is what is says?
297600
Public Law 94-142 (Education of All Handicapped Children Act) \nIn 1975, Congress passed Public Law 94-142 (Education of All Handicapped Children Act), now codified as IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act). In order to receive federal funds, states must develop and implement policies that assure a free appropriate public education (FAPE) to all children with disabilities. The state plans must be consistent with the federal statute, Title 20 United States Code Section 1400 et.seq. (20 USC 1400) (For more information on IDEA, legislative history, implications, see the other files in forum libraries, especially those that relate to the Shannon Carter case which was argued before the US Supreme Court on October 6, 1993.)
665485
Try this:\n\nhttp://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/Historical/112205.asp\n\nHope it helps.
704204
This didn't mention anything about now, but has records for previous years. The Bottom link says 14 in California and they say that's 2nd to Texas. Overall I think about 50
280971
you 'believe' that it was '88 to '91????\n\n\nID theft is illegal as*bag... \n\nfind something more productive to do like play tag with semi's or lick the gray hound bus bumper on the interstate.
329348
Milk.  That is why Elmer's has a picture of a cow as the company logo.
1187845
I believe that the term you are looking for is "Trafe".  It refers to all animals deemed unclean under Levitical law.  These laws, if you really look into them, weren't arbitrary.  They were designed to keep safe people who were born in a time when food spoiled extremely easily.
146835
U.S. Supreme Court\nSAN ANTONIO SCHOOL DISTRICT v. RODRIGUEZ, 411 U.S. 1 (1973)\n411 U.S. 1\n\nSAN ANTONIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL. v. RODRIGUEZ ET AL.\nAPPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT\nOF TEXAS\nNo. 71-1332.\n\nArgued October 12, 1972\nDecided March 21, 1973\n\nThe financing of public elementary and secondary schools in Texas is a product of state and local participation. Almost half of the revenues are derived from a largely state-funded program designed to provide a basic minimum educational offering in every school. Each district supplements state aid through an ad valorem tax on property within its jurisdiction. Appellees brought this class action on behalf of schoolchildren said to be members of poor families who reside in school districts having a low property tax base, making the claim that the Texas system's reliance on local property taxation favors the more affluent and violates equal protection requirements because of substantial interdistrict disparities in per-pupil expenditures resulting primarily from differences in the value of assessable property among the districts. The District Court, finding that wealth is a "suspect" classification and that education is a "fundamental" right, concluded that the system could be upheld only upon a showing, which appellants failed to make, that there was a compelling state interest for the system. The court also concluded that appellants failed even to\n\nPage 411 U.S. 1, 2\n\ndemonstrate a reasonable or rational basis for the State's system. Held:\n\n      1. This is not a proper case in which to examine a State's laws under standards of strict judicial scrutiny, since that test is reserved for cases involving laws that operate to the disadvantage of suspect classes or interfere with the exercise of fundamental rights and liberties explicitly or implicitly protected by the Constitution. Pp. 18-44.\n\n      (a) The Texas system does not disadvantage any suspect class. It has not been shown to discriminate against any definable class of "poor" people or to occasion discriminations depending on the relative wealth of the families in any district. And, insofar as the financing system disadvantages those who, disregarding their individual income characteristics, reside in comparatively poor school districts, the resulting class cannot be said to be suspect. Pp. 18-28.\n\n      (b) Nor does the Texas school-financing system impermissibly interfere with the exercise of a "fundamental" right or liberty. Though education is one of the most important services performed by the State, it is not within the limited category of rights recognized by this Court as guaranteed by the Constitution. Even if some identifiable quantum of education is arguably entitled to constitutional protection to make meaningful the exercise of other constitutional rights, here there is no showing that the Texas system fails to provide the basic minimal skills necessary for that purpose. Pp. 29-39.\n\n      (c) Moreover, this is an inappropriate case in which to invoke strict scrutiny since it involves the most delicate and difficult questions of local taxation, fiscal planning, educational policy, and federalism, considerations counseling a more restrained form of review. Pp. 40-44.\n\n      2. The Texas system does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Though concededly imperfect, the system bears a rational relationship to a legitimate state purpose. While assuring a basic education for every child in the State, it permits and encourages participation in and significant control of each district's schools at the local level. Pp. 44-53.\n\n337 F. Supp. 280, reversed.\n\nPOWELL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C. J., and STEWART, BLACKMUN, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. [411 U.S. 1, 3]
980257
no its not legal in Texas. u can put them on light poles and trees. u can ask local stores if its alright to put them in the stores window. another thing is to go to your local radio station and ask them to put his dog type on the air to see if anyone has seen him.
63978
Check this website.  It has a copy of it and tells how it was bascially written over night and in a hurry.  This website tells you all about Texas.\nwww.lsjunction.com/docs/tdoi.htm
425500
www.cdva.ca.gov/service/plates.asp  -I found it under Yahoo!(the best) Search Engine.
1008440
I would love to see that law.  (Heck, my whole family would love to see that law!)  Do you have a citation?  I have a feeling this is too good to be true.
279789
"texas department of corrections" or "texas laws.com"
934919
You can download an explanation here:\n\nag.ca.gov/publications/2003_Intro_BrownAct.pdf\n\nEnjoy!
343296
See: http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/pe.toc.htm
1123577
you might find something here\n\nhttp://newmexicostate.mastmexico.com/newmexicostateincometax/
2197
Unfortunately, since 1977, the laws have changed so those numbers don't mean much. You can't find the set of 1977 laws online. You may want to try going to the Buffalo city hall ask for help there.