Who would win skirmish between a Churchill and a Panzer?
483918
The Churchill was a versatile tank which came in many different specialist versions including the Petard, which had a massive mortar mounted in the turret for destroying bunkers, bridgelayers, flails and flamethrowers.\n\nIn their standard tank mode however they were not designed with tank on tank engagement in mind as they were undergunned and underarmed when compared to anything bigger than a Panzer Mk4.\n\nThey were much more an infantry support and assault tank.\n\nA Sherman "Firefly" however which carried the upgraded British 76mm gun could hold its own against a Panther.\n\nTank on tank battles on the western front however were rare and hardly ever planned.
739243
Ike or Patton. Although Patton was a little crisp on the sides!
978005
The answer to your questions is the Juggernaut. \n\nBut the real questions here is Juggernaut VS The Blob who would win.
1023629
trying to decide who would win the next match
1091061
John Wayne could beat all of them. Because he uses his senses, and he had the patience to wait them out. Cause you have to wait for the right moment. Clint Eastwood has speed, so he could beat them too.
905101
neither...they would lie each other out of fighting
718169
The german tanks were initially way better than any allied tank, because they had much thicker armor, and a larger caliber gun.  The armor would not be puntured by most allied tanks guns, and the German guns would punch right through the thinner armor of any allied tank, such as the Sherman.
359759
In my opinion, this two countries could be the winner if they can avoid using the war as a solution of their problems. The diplomatic conversations would create a new great atmosphere of their relations.\n\nMay God not allow another battle occurs and occurs again...\n\nBe Wise...
435891
they conflict to eachother.
784914
they'll need to have a steel cage death-match.\n\nif you have a change of heart in the middle of the battle, you can throw simple weapons like clubs or axes to one of the guys.
295472
The Lee and Grant Tanks have 2 guns...kind of obsolete when we got into WW2 We gave a lot to the Brits. Top gun in turrent was I believe a 37 mm gun and gun in side coupula was probably a 75mm ..Ill hve to look it up on the web.Oh you are probably thinking of the giant British Mark IV tanks of WW1  They had guns mounted on the sides..The "males" had cannons and Females had machineguns.
1146762
I am, I am! But, only if I get the big gun. I'll get moving on making our bunker, you start rounding up supplies. Who are we fighting?
639219
it was fired. lots of times. \nstationed firmly or mounted on a railway wagon\n\ntry this http://www.waffenhq.de/panzer/dickeberta.html\n\ntranslation of text would be difficult (much technical), but nice pic. click an "bildergalerie" below
709024
The Tasmanian Devil (sarcophilus harrisii), a marsupial would for sure win the fight as it is an extremely aggresive animal and has very sharp teeth too. The devil will attack while a wolverine and badger would only defend themselves. The badger would lose the fight though.
418775
offense Mickey Mantle\ndefense toss up between Willie Mays or Roberto Clemente.
1129795
It'll be a geat match to watch between two Arab dessert warriors. We should expect a draw.
1048297
Italy vs. Australia  and\nSwitzerland vs. Ukraine