how south africa was incorporated into the world system, how its economy has developed since incorporation?
484597
I assume you mean the takeover by Mandela and company?  Terrorism and the intervention of American bleeding-heart liberals is how it was "incorporated into the world system".  Since then their economy has gone to hell in a hand basket and is not getting any better.  The people who took over were the old communists wearing a different name.  Read your history.  If they haven't rewritten it already.
763098
South America and Africa are moving apart at 5.7cm a year. See link for evidence.
1007835
3 countries :  Australia, South Africa, Pakistan
438345
I'm from SA and am totally against Apartheid! that's the reason why the country seems like it's going down! if there were never a Apartheid Regime and everyone had equal opportunity and education, South Africa would be a first world country!
271162
The country is Lesotho, a constitutional monarchy.  When South Africa was under British rule, it was administered as a separate colony (apart from a few years) and became a its own country when colonial rule ended.  It looks like it was separate because it was too much trouble for the South African government to want to deal with in the 1870s and early 1880s, so they made the British Crown deal with it.
235188
as far as i can tell cause the people who are in charge of the nations are corrupt and never developed their countries through investment and private enterprise\n\nmy friend is reading a book about how agriculture is why europe is so well off, that there are all these immunities that europe built up because of all the farm animals, africa doesnt have a lot of farmland i dont think, not as much as europe,\nso the theory is that germs else where the last 1000 years have kept other parts of the world from developing at the pace of the europe/america\n\n\nI think the reality is in order to have a successful industrial revolution people who have capitol, ie money, have to invest it in business that are going to buy the machines, etc.\n\nin africa i dont think theyve done that, over the last 140 years, had people who bought machines for an industrial revolution,  . . . because my theory is the leaders are using all the wealth for their own purposes
741899
UK, Australia, Germany. There was some work done in South Africa, but I do not know the status now.
6459
Full participation.  Much like other "underdeveloped" nations, and borderline "developed" nations, that are integrating themselves as much as possible (India in particular), the subsaharan african countries should figure out where they can participate in the global economy.  The big question they must ask, and answer, is what resources do they have to offer that can compete/participate?\n\nI also feel the industrialized nations (mostly Western), need to adjust their attitudes toward international companies opening facilities in underdeveloped nations in general.  While exploitation in any form is unacceptable, there needs to be a different definition of exploitation in some cases, especially in countries where poverty (and likely death) is the only option.  Is it really exploitation when you offer an individual employment at four or five times the local going rate?  If I were in that situation, I'd say no.  However, paying a rate on par with Western standards offers these companies no incentive to move into these nations hindering economic development.  It can also severely upset the economics of a region as, suddenly, there are large influxes of cash, which can cause spiraliing inflation, making matters worse for those without these (relatively speaking) high-paying jobs.
470694
The world Economy is a triangular Society:-\n\nThe Very Rich  >>> 20%\n\nThe Rich >>>> industralized nations  45%\n\nThe Poor & the Very Poor >>> 3rd & 4th World 35%
155269
economic development -  the analysis of the economic progress of nations.
311544
it is the currency of south africa. A south african coin
466591
The resources of Africa have historically been exploited by Europeans and Americans, etc. The Africans themselves have been largely cut out of the deal. \n\nA handful of African leaders get rich, the rest of the population dies of malaria and dysentery.
300404
UNTIL SOUTH AFRICANS TAKE-OVER..
84018
The basics of it was that when Belgium colonized the area, they invented a sort of racial divide in the country between Tutsis and Hutus. There is little actual difference between the two groups, but the Belgians found it helpful to create a tiered class system. The Tutsis, the minority, were given priveleged status and ran the government in most respects. The Hutus, the majority of the population, were kept out of office and influence.\n\nEventually the strife between the two came to such a head that the Tutsis were forced to resign from most positions of government and a new, fairly democratic constitution was made, which meant that the Hutus took control. As a result most of the Tutsis fled the country.\n\nThere was a growing movement for democracy and reunification of the two ethnic groups, but when talks failed Tutsis invaded the country. As a result, there was a massive uprising against Tutsis, in which the ruling class of Hutus killed at least 100,000 Tutsis. Eventually the Tutsis defeated the Hutus and ended the genocide. Afterwards 2 million Hutus fled the country, fearing reprocussions from the Tutsis. They have now mostly returned.
1172543
Well how could a developing country have a fast economic growth? They are in the building process, more then likely have a new government, are not established in the world market and probably don't have much of a currency system. All these things take time to start. Building a strong and stable economy could take years.
1093772
Kenya's main economic strengths include tourism and agriculture. The economy is only now beginning to show some growth after years of stagnation. Some argue that this slow economic growth is because of poor management and uneven commitment to reform; others insist that it is due to falling commodity prices and poor access to Western markets.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya\n\nThe regional hub for trade and finance in East Africa, Kenya has been hampered by corruption and by reliance upon several primary goods whose prices have remained low. In the key December 2002 elections, Daniel Arap MOI's 24-year-old reign ended, and a new opposition government took on the formidable economic problems facing the nation. In 2003, progress was made in rooting out corruption and encouraging donor support. GDP grew more than 5% in 2005.\n\nhttp://cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ke.html
589570
South Africa and Australia