why does CO2 attack  atmosophere  and how ؟?
489293
Good day! As far as I know CO2 or carbon dioxide does not destroy our atmosphere, as a matter of fact it's part of our atmosphere...The one that your telling that destroys our atmosphere is the CFC or Chlorofluorocarbon, that can be found in air fresheners, perfumes, air conditioners and refrigerators. And I read in a book that the destroyed part found in Australia can only be whole again if we pulverize all the seaweeds and distribute it up high(stratosphere). So, that's it, I hope I answered even a part of your question.
1118601
sky is nothing but made up of gases . as gases rise uo they all collect above
613038
an event that is effecting the atmosphere today was the mass production of cars and industrial sites in the world. this is hurtin the atmoshperic ozone layer.the carbon monozide coming out of these things is whats doing all the damage
904836
carbon dioxide from the air combining with ribulose 1,5 bisphosphate
551957
because the co2 is pressurized, meaning the molecules have greater kinetic energy even at the same temperature. when the seal is broken, it depressurizes so the kinetic energy of the molecules can equalize, and so lots of co2 molecules rush out, making a whoosh sound because they cause air molecules to vibrate as they move, making sound.
377959
Global average temperature is subject to a couple of external and internal influences. Position relative to the sun and sun spot activity are major external influences which occur in cycles of various repeat rates (sun spots seem to oscillate in a ten year cycle, frex, and might be related to the El Ninjo phenomenon).\nInternal influences include composition of the atmosphere, reflectivity of the surfaces and unusual particle pollution (e.g. after huge fires, like a couple of years ago in Spain and Portugal, or after volcanic eruptions).\n\nGases have varying heat capacity: diatomic gases (oxygen, nitrogen) are "the norm" and rather limited in their ability to take up heat.\n\nGas molecules store heat by rotating or vibrating (they also speed up when heated, but transfer that energy quickly via collisions). A diatomic gas can store significant amounts of energy only by  a vibration along the bond between the atoms and by rotation around the center of this bond on an axis perpendicular to it.\n\nTriatomic molecules (water, CO2, Ozone) can vibrate along two bonds, which allows them to store more energy. The longer CO2 molecule (still straight) can store more energy by the same rotations diatomic gases have, plus it can vibrate out of the straight form. Water is an angled molecule and can have additional vibrations along that angle.\n\nPolyatomic molecules like e.g. methane have lots of ways of rotating and vibrating, which allows them to store a lot more heat than normal atmosphere.\n\nThe greenhouse gases as a rule have a higher heat capacity than diatomic gases. Main culprits are CO2 and CH4, with one molecule of CH4 having more heat capacity than several molecules of CO2.\n\nBoth these gases are emitted by both technical and natural processes. Our atmosphere was in an equilibrium state without any technical processes.\n\nTechnical processes also produce other effects, such as cloud cover. Airoplane exhausts form ice clouds in the upper atmosphere which can reduce the amount of solar energy (through reflection) by as much as 10%, counteracting the greenhous effect their CO2 and H2O emissions produce.\n\nClimate is a very unstable equilibrium and can easily be tipped either way by small causes. That makes it extremely hard for experts to predict changes, and not much easier interpreting past changes. One problem with discussing human influence on the climate is that there is no comparision value for climate without human influence, we don't have another earth to experiment with.\n\n\nAll these facts somehow contributed to the rise of average global temperature. Locally, that may mean that the climate grows colder...\n\nThe rise has been observed, a trend is expected. Exact causes are hard to nail down, and the balance may be tipped radically into the other direction if the gulf stream gets cut off (though not as radically as Hollywood suggests).
142692
whew, thats odd, um i would have to say the reaction that takes place to create all that gas that is produced to fill up the air bag, im completely guessing tho, so dont take my word on it
685823
Strictly speaking, it is not true.  CO2, being heavier than air, WILL accumulate on ground level, if the air is perfectly still for a long enough period of time.  Or if the CO2 gas is colder than the air.  \n\nKeep in mind, though, that since the molecular weights of CO and of air are pretty close, the relative rate of diffusion of CO in air will be fairly slow.  That means if you have something making CO and putting it into the air, the worst place to be is right next to it.  Especially if the air is still.
297663
I did an AICHE project on this a year ago.  We set up a model using a tower and extracted CO2 from the atmosphere using NaOH.  CO2 + NaOH yields sodium bicarbonate.  It's very expensive to do, however, because the regeneration process of NaOH required a lot of energy.  Also, we ran into problems with air circulation.  Obviously the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere is very small in comparison to nitrogen and oxygen, so in order to sequester enough CO2 to make a difference in the atmosphere, you have to be moving air at phenomenal velocities, which requires a lot of energy.  Burning fuel to produce this energy is kind of an oxymoron because you'd be adding to the problem of CO2; therefore, we used solar energy in our model.  We then said we'd store the CO2 in empty oil storages.
731446
c3h8 can not exist in the earths atmosphere
598151
A) carbon burning in air\nAll the other choices demonstrate physical changes.
646459
mainly CO2, which is why scientists are researching the planets to find out effects/ways to prevent global warming. it is often called "earths evil twin"
318431
Atmosphere has a very low heat capacity compared to hydrosphere. It will react strongly on short term (well below diurnal) changes, like insolation (amount of energy absorbed by the sun).
668625
See this link\n\nhttp://us.badm.washington.edu/yalch/Research/atmosphe.htm
1165908
Good question. I never understood that, either. Maybe something to do with the government or the some atmosphere changes? I have no idea, really. Sorry.
756113
Primary(aprox. 46 billion years ago) atmhosphere was included hydrogen, helium and ammonia. \nSecondary (current) atmosphere eveolved as volcanic activity added nitrogen, water vapor and CO2 to the atmosphere. And appearance of green plants added free oxygen to the air. \nAdditionally there are some variable components of atmosphere:two imporatnt ones; water vapor and ozone. Permanent compnonets are NITROGEN, OXYGEN, ARGON and CO2.
768729
This is an interesting but certainly not simple question. Ozone is formed naturally in the stratosphere as O2 molecules absorb UV light and break down to O radicals. These O radicals then react with O2 molecules and collide with another third body to remove excess energy to form O3 molecule.\n\nO2 + hv → 2 O\nO + O2 +M → O3 + M\n\nThese O3 molecules in the stratosphere is considered as our friend because they absorb most of the harmful UV radiation so that we will not be exposed to that. \n\nMore and more studies have shown that our stratospheric ozone is decreasing. This is due to the CFCs that we used long time ago. These CFCs was used heavily long time ago because of its high vapor pressure property. For example, it can be used as fire extinguishants, propellants, and solvents. One problem about these molecules is that they are very non-reactive in the lower atmosphere. As a result, they accumulate in the atmosphere and until they diffuse to the upper atmosphere, where the strong UV can break them down. As these CFCs react with strong UV and form Cl radicals, these Cl radicals undergo a "chain reaction" to destroy our ozone. As you may imagine from the name, each Cl radicals can effectively destroy many ozone molecules before it reacts with something else and be removed. So, only a very small amount is enough to destroy lots of ozone. CFCs have been banned long time ago, but because of its non-reactive property, the ozone hole problem that we are having today is caused by yesterday's CFCs.\n\nOzone in the lower troposphere, on the other hand, is considered as pollutants. It is because these ozone can react with many hydrocarbon in the presence of sunlight to generate smog (which is also called photochemical smog because they are generated in the presence of solar radiation). These smog not only reduce our visibility, they also irritate our respiratory systems. High concentration of ozone can also cause lots of damage to vegetation.\n\nThese lower tropospheric ozone is formed mostly due to reaction of NOx (NO and NO2) with sunlight in the presence of some hydrocarbons. As you may know, the vehicle emission contains lots of NOx, which is one of the reason for causing the tropospheric ozone.