Should I do this NBA trade?
479356
Sure why not. T-mac isn't even playing and the 3 you're getting are all awesome.
985409
I wouldn't wait on Marbury, it doesn't help he plays for a terrible team.  I don't liek Haslem either.  If you can get some trade value try to get Okafor, he is a point and rebound machine, plus a lot of blocks.  Mehmet Okur is also a good player for rebounds and points.  Plus he usually gets at least a block a game, and can hit some 3s too.
439309
If D. Lee was healthy, the trade looks fine..   though I do like Abreu as the best player out of the 7.  If nothing else, you gained a couple of free spots with Lee on DL.  You can tough it out for 2 months.  Without knowing the rest of your team, it's not really appropriate for anyone to advise who you should pick up.
939138
No. I am not going to do that. TEs are so inconsistent that you cannot trade a starting running back for a TE, unless their names are Gates or Gonzalez. I think what you should do is to see if you can counter them for something more, if you like your depth at RBs. Or like others said, free agents. Ben Watson should still be available. \n\nIf you accept you will lose too much, for a player who cannot get you consistent points anyway.
940019
Tough, tough decision.  But at the end of the day, it would really depend on what your team needs.  In Kidd, you have a player who is rebounding from a poor first week (despite the triple-double on the first day of the season) and is now averaging about 10+ points, 9 rebounds, and 8 assists.\n\nWhile in Nash (who has a hip injury but is still playing), you have the king of assists (having only played in one game wherein he didn't get double figures in assists (9)).  Nash is also a good source for three points.\n\nIn the end, I would keep Kidd.  With the recent injury to Richard Jefferson, more will be expected of him despite the arrival of Marcus Williams who was expected to cut into his playing minutes.\n\nHope this helps.
932671
Tough choice.....but i don't think you should.\n\nMarion is definitely the #1 fantasy player, but you won't find a center that can give you the numbers that Yao can.  It's hard to fill that position so I don't think you should give him up.
744481
I would keep emeka and biedrins because good centers are hard to come by.  PG's on the other hand is easier to pick up.  Since you are in a 20 team league (its really deep) I would keep all the centers you can and maybe you can bargain for decent PGs by trading in okayish centers.
739040
I see no reason to make this trade. You're definitely helping the other guy more than he is you.  Jordan is on a bad team that is only getting worse, and he's fallingout of favor with the HC\nBush is sure to have a 100 yd game here sooner or later, and better to have him do it while he's sitting on your bench, than when he's in your opponent's lineup.
81902
korver would be a good trade bait for someone like tayshaun prince, for defensive stats. crawford, davis, fisher and marshall can take care of the threes for you.\na good center would probably be okur or gasol. okur can come real cheap if you give up someone like a drew gooden or a donyell marshall + a scrub
934581
Your biggest problem is Nowitzki is on your bench. That should NEVER happen, Morrison is okay for a rookie but seriously!!! You need a couple of better centers and maybe switch Parker into a utility spot and sit Cassell or Smith instead of Parker. Try to trade Shaq and Baron-he cant stay healthy and could get you a quality center but overall seems like a pretty good team and you should be in contention all season.
755313
As long as you have a strong players to fill in your C positions this season I would definitely take this trade.  \n\nI am pretty sure poster is referring to Rafer Alston based upon his statement about "a game with 14" assists. Alston had a 12 AST game Saturday against Dallas. Felton has maxed out at 8 I believe.\n\nIn my opinion, Curry isn't going to do any better than he has so far, and likely will do worse. He's realy a one category player: Points. He doesn't rebound as much as you would like. He's gotten around 8 a game this season but that is not typical. His contribution in peripherals is not overwhelming either. Furthermore, Channing Frye is underperforming for NY right now. Once Frye comes around, which will happen, I predict Curry's value takes a hit. I could be wrong on this, it's not an exact science, but I'm also fairly sure there are some Cs on your waiver wire right now who will pan out better than Curry for the season.\n\nAs for Alston, he's in a great position for assists. He averaged just under 7 for last year and I think it's entirely reasonable for him to hover right around 7 a game this season as well. He's at best the fourth scoring option on Houston, but with T-Mac, Yao, and Battier around him he will have plenty of opportunities to dish out assists. Plus what really sets him apart are the peripherals. He's a 1.5+ steal per game guy easy and the same with 3PTM (he's outperforming these averages so far this season).\n\nIf someone will actually do this trade, you MUST go for it. It is clearly in your favor!
887455
That's a tough call, cause Colston is really getting it done this year.  But I have a tough time rationalizing giving up Westbrook.  If you don't have him, you are lacking a second top tier RB.  Maroney isn't any better than the other guys you already have (in my opinion)\n\nWhat if you countered with Lundy (or any of your other backs besides SA and BW) and any receiver except Holt and AJ for just Colston?  I doubt he'd bite, but worth a shot.
647662
Here is the question you should ask yourself. What player would you take with the second pick? What player would you expect to get with the 4th or 5th pick? There will be a little dropoff there, but it might be acceptable if it means trading the 15th pick for the 12th or 13th. I don't think I would do it myself, but there might be cases where this will work out pretty well.
772710
No Deal you already have a well balanced team from what it looks like here.  Plus let me very honest with you, the season is way early and only if you need serious help should you be considering a trade. Let the players you have go for about 2 maybe 3 weeks then see where you are in each of your offensive and defensive categories. Then go from there. Your team is well balanced with offense and defense, and if it was a head to head league you're in then I imagine you're doing prettu good thus far, if it's a roto league the only place i see you struggling is in FG% and Steals. Stick with your team for a few weeks then come back to a trade tha better suits you for the long haul if possible
1155204
That wouldn't be a bad trade, it has both ups and downs. Teixeira's been settling down after a hot first month. Pierre hasn't really been there so you can get your average up defeintly by trading them away and getting Hafner and Roberts. The only thing is your going to find a pitcher that you can replace Zito with because hes been pitching very well this season. Perhaps a Madduz or Millwood. Peavy has also been lights out as of late.  I'd say go for it, make the trade, and then try to find some pitching. Your offense should defeintly benefit though.
681109
I would probably at least consider making that trade. It sounds logical, for all the reasons you mention. I really wonder about any team that has Jeff Kent playing first at this point in the season.
157
Whenever you can trade 2 good players for 1 superstar player, it is a steal!  Because now it will open up another slot on your active roster and now you can play your other good player that's always in your bench.  But if you don't have depth, I wouldn't pull the trade trigger.