Any one know anything on Harry Potter?
493015
I don't know of any sites but I have to go with you on Saber...I like the movies, it is because of reality that we NEED to have  fantasy to keep our sanity
509944
I like Harry Potter deep-fried.\n\nYou know why Harry Potter's popular? It's a fad.\n\nIt's not particularly good writing, or particularly good acting. The idea of magic is ony mildly interesting, and the plot is just good vs. evil.\n\nI think it would be great is one of the lead actors died and they had to re-film the old series. (Not Harry because he's good in other things, too). Maybe even one of the bad guys.
441062
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_Harry
246005
Voldemort were after James and Lily because they were a part of The Order of the Phoenix. They were trying to stop him from taking over the wizarding world. I think in the end Harry will ultimately kill Voldemort. I also don't believe that Professor Dumbledore is really gone for good. Somehow I think he will come back. I hope you have read the books, because if not, then I just ruined it for you. I think Harry will end up becoming an Auror, or he may eliminate the need for them all together. It is very hard to predict the end to the story because it is always so much more complicated than you expect. Hopefully Ron and Hermione will get together and Harry will get back together with Ginny. We will have to wait and see though! You should check out www.jkrowling.com. It is JK's personal website, she also has links to her favorite fan websites about HP.
742756
Too much to give highlights in this forum, but here are a few high points.\n\nSnape becomes DADA teacher.\nNew character "Slughorn" is new potions master\nHarry borrows/steals an old potions book that is filled with mysterious potion-making tips that make him suddenly the "best" potions student.\nDumbledore giove Harry private lessons, in which they study memories and gain clues to Voldemort's possible weaknesses.\nDumbledore tasks Harry to retrieve a Memory from Slughorn\n    (The memory deals with how young Tom Riddle (Voldemort) decided to split his soul and save the bits of it in "horcruxes".  These prevent him from being able to die.)\nRon and Hermione become a couple\nHarry learns how to Apparate.\nHarry and Ginny Weasley become a couple\nHarry is convinced that Malfoy and Snape are plotting to kill Dumbledore.\nDumbledore assures Harry that Snape is acting exactly as Dumbledre expects him to.\nHarry and Dumbledore learn about 7 posible splinters of Voldemort's soul, and go on  a quest to retrieve and destroy one that they know about.\n\nThe quest goes badly, the horcrux has already been stolen, and Dumbledore is gravely injured.\n\nAs Harry and Dumbledore return to the castle, Malfoy is waiting to kill him but can't pull the trigger.\n\nSnape appears and a shocking event happens\n\nThats the gist of it.  Sorry if I've spoiled it.
600684
1)  No.  J.K. Rowling has said Harry Potter bears no relation to Lord Voldemort.  You may find the answer to that and many more questions at her personal website jkrowling.com.\n\n2)  J.K. Rowling has also stated on her website that Neville is not included in the prophecy and that it refers specifically to Lord Voldemort and Harry... and the actual phrasing is "and either must die at the hand of the other for neither can live while the other survives".  What this actually means is still up for much speculation, and while I have my own theories on the subject considering events in the Harry Potter series up to this point, it would take a long time to explain them, so I shall refrain from doing so here.\n\n3)  Is Snape good or bad?  As she points out in her books, people are rarely so simple.  Is Draco Malfoy good or bad?  Most of the evidence we've seen suggests he's bad, but the Sectumsempra chapter of Half Blood Prince gives us a glimpse into a boy who feels very much in over his head and whose public mask of confidence is just that... he's not prepared to be the type of person others want him to be.  Is Snape like that?  We haven't been shown very much of his private workings outside the short trip Harry took through the Pensieve in his office, so that, too is up for debate.  I don't think the evidence points toward him being evil, though, nor does it really indicate what people think it does.  His "unbreakable vow" was not specific in its second part.  Narcissa Malfoy trailed off before specifying what she was asking Snape to do, so for all that he could have interpreted the vow to mean "I must do what Draco Malfoy has been told by Voldemort to do if he fails to brush his teeth tonight!  DRACO!  GET IN HERE!  I SHALL STAND HERE AND WATCH AS YOU BRUSH YOUR TEETH THIS INSTANT!"  There you go, that part of the vow's fulfilled.\n\nThat said, though, after he ostensibly killed Dumbledore, his behavior suggests the part of the vow he had to fulfill--since it was the only explicit part-- was to take any action he could to protect Draco Malfoy, which is exactly what he did that night (and what Dumbledore did, too... I have to admit I thought he'd die, but I didn't really ever figure he'd die for Draco Malfoy).  \n\nBeyond that, even while he was fleeing the last thing Snape tried to do in the few seconds between Draco Malfoy escaping to safety and him having to follow, was pound into Harry Potter's head the two lessons Harry needs to most learn to prevail against Lord Voldemort, and which Snape has been increasingly angry Harry has not learned from Snape's repeated attempts to teach him over the past two years.  Instead of truly injuring Harry, he only slowed him up enough so Harry was forced to listen to him... every time Harry attempted to hurt him, he simply knocked the attack aside as a further demonstration of the advantages of being able to use those two abilities (occlumency and silent spell casting) during battle, all while shouting exactly what it was Harry should learn from Snape's easy deflection of the attacks.  He may not be a pleasant man, but Snape's actions were the actions of a teacher who knew he only had a few more moments to instruct a student who did not understand, but whom he was desperate to see succeed (for once).  If he really wanted Harry to fail, he wouldn't have bothered explaining just why those lessons Harry wasn't cottoning onto were so dreadfully important for him to learn, especially since they're the two lessons Snape himself would most have to employ in order to deceive Lord Voldemort and stay alive.
355234
I would check both Goblet of Fire and Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them.  If you don't have FB&WFT, you can find that information on www.mugglenet.com.
1022935
She's Come Undone, by Wally Lamb. Greatest read ever! Then there's always the Harry Potter books, there's 6 of them now, so they should keep you pretty busy.
114843
Not sure how much earnings JK Rowling has made from Harry Potter but it has now sold over 300 million copies in 63 languages!  \n\nThen there are the movies too - so the answer must be a LOT of money!!
628800
The best info on it...\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Da_Vinci_Code\n\nCan I get 10 points for that?
70882
Just because you read a book about harry potter doesn't mean you're going to want to perform witchcraft. People often think that way because of the ways they were brought up. (Values, morals, religon of upbringing, etc)\nIf you do want to do anything that is considered "magic" in the movie, in reality, you wouldn't be doing witchcraft at all.\nWitchcraft is a pretty broad term. Generally now, modern witchcraft is now called Wicca, and is not really "witchcraft" at all. It's a real religion, although the whole concept of "Wicca" and "religion" is really debated in the community\nPS: "Jesus Freak" didn't answer the question. she just made a blind statement.
407577
Well, it is rumored that HP7 will be released mid-2007.\n\nHere are a couple of things from JKR's site:\n\nListen carefully, I shall say this only once: the only sources you should trust concerning information on the Half-Blood Prince are official spokespeople for my publishers and my official website.\n- JK Rowling, JKRowling.com \n\nThe title of the book will not be "Harry Potter and the Pyramids of Furmat." \n\nThere will be no character named "Icicle," and JK said that she didn't recall saying there ever would be. \n\nDumbledore is not Harry's relative. \n\nHarry is not related to Voldemort and he is not related to Salazar Slytherin. \n\nLily Potter is not alive. \n\nLily was not a Death Eater. \n\nCrookshanks is not an Animagus. \n\nNeville is not the son of Peter Pettigrew. \n\nRemus Lupin does not have a twin brother and will not be killed by Peter's silver hand.\n\nYou could visit http://www.hp-lexicon.org/about/books/book_6-7.html for more info.
117077
Heyyy who cares??? I love Harry Potter.\nThe Harry potter series are deliciously suspensful, with wonderful plot twists, so many characters- some we love, some we hate, some we suspect. It includes familiar student concerns like homeworks, grades, hateful professors, fierceful rivalry, blush-inducing crushes. Harry has been growing and so have I!\n\nThe movies are good too. Though i would not compare them with the books! The directors have done a good job, though we always feel the book has been reduced to a large extent. The trio (Dan, Emma, Rupert) are more than perfect for their roles. And they hav made every teenage fan go 'gaga'.\n\nAnyone out there who hates Harry Potter, without  having read the book or seen the movie : "Hell to them"
499632
What kind of things would you like to know about The Wind in the Willows?
846278
Yuppersss... just LOVE 'harry potter' !!!! ive read all the books and have all four movies so far and cant wait for the newest movie to be released !!!!  ive been a fan since the first movie came out and even my Step-mother likes the books too and she's in her sixties and im 44 ..
543488
Yes i have and i love them all. I really like the latest one, its my favorite because it gives so much information about Harry and what his life is like, and why it is like that.
1155352
I type my opinion on this at least once a week.\n\nHarry Potter is children's (and some adults--like me!) FICTION!!!!!  It is a made-up, fun story.  It is about a male witch, but it is NOT witchcraft!  Some of the characters (made up--fictional---remember this part) are witches who are GOOD and some are BAD--------classic battles of good and evil.  Ohmigosh, is Superman witchcraft??  He Can fly!  Is Wonder Woman witchcraft?  She flies an invisible plane!  Is Batman...........oh, you get the picture.\n\nStop being such a fraidy-cat, and enjoy the books.