Do you think that ashes should include 1 or 2 other teams?
479340
yes definitely. more the merrier
137607
I disagree. Friend, cricket is a funny game. Miracles do happen. :) Yes, Pakistan are the favourites. Deficiency of fast bowlers will hurt India. But then again, you never know with cricket.
931019
You can pick anyone for the home series. Tell me a squad for an overseas tour - or the upcoming test series in SA.
367750
Australia is a great team..\nIf not ponting there will be somebody else to rise up to the\nsituation\nAustralia is not a one man army depending on Ponting...\n\n\n... I am Indian
509168
We cannot compare football with cricket both are different games, as so many cricket players not intrested in  playing too much cricket, it is better to reduce the no.of matches. Personally i believe it will helps international cricket or else people will not respond very much for every match.
745087
It's only the beginning, long way to go in the series yet.\nThe score is bad for England especially as they have lost 3 wickets and scored only 53 runs in reply.\n\nFor our friends in the southern hemisphere....\n lets not forget who are actually holders of The Ashes.\nAs well as the Rugby Union World Cup!!
594085
Well, if its two on one, then I think that the team of two would win. You get more ground coverage and conserve more energy.
734691
Sorry to say but the Aussies are not easily beaten at home.  Their record speaks for itself.  Firstly, England has too little key players on tour.  Freddie, Steven and Kevin is good, but not that good.  Aus has 11 very good players plus back-up to spare.\n\nEngland is also not on a very high recently and might just regret the ashes.  I predict 4-0 to Australia.
948940
5772 Runs combined by Australia and England in the 2005 Ashes series. 5 test matches (tour games and ODIs not included).\n\nhttp://stats.cricinfo.com/guru?sdb=team;team=ENG;class=testteam;filter=advanced;opposition=AUS;notopposition=0;homeaway=home;continent=0;country=0;notcountry=0;groundid=0;season=2005;startdefault=1877-03-15;start=1877-03-15;decade=0;enddefault=2006-08-20;end=2006-08-20;tourneyid=0;finals=0;daynight=0;toss=0;scheduleddays=0;scheduledovers=0;innings=0;followon=0;result=0;seriesresult=0;captainid=0;recent=;viewtype=list;runslow=;runshigh=;wicketslow=;wicketshigh=;ballslow=;ballshigh=;overslow=;overslow=;overshigh=;overshigh=;bpo=0;batevent=0;conclow=;conchigh=;takenlow=;takenhigh=;ballsbowledlow=;ballsbowledhigh=;oversbowledlow=;oversbowledlow=;oversbowledhigh=;oversbowledhigh=;bpobowled=0;bowlevent=0;submit=1;.cgifields=viewtype
755734
Considering the present strength and forms of both the teams, it will be very difficult for England to retain the Ashes
107937
how come u have 3 teams?
6193
The Ashes is a biennial Test cricket contest played between England and Australia. The series is named after the trophy, which is a small wooden urn said to contain the burnt bails from an 1882 game at The Oval. Each Ashes series typically consists of five Test matches, and the series alternate between the two countries. The next Ashes series is due to start on 2005-07-21 and will be played in England.
1100116
Yea, I think it needs to be included..\n\nI think they should have a college sports category, that would cover football, basketball and other college sports\n\nLets make it happen!!
871630
The truth is the current England team is crap. The public doesn't realise it because the British media would like to make them believe otherwise. \nJust wait till the ashes begin in 2 weeks to see more feeble excuses from the press! (and also from the team itself)
717651
That would put an odd number of teams in each league.  An even number is needed in order for each team to be playing regularly.
1137730
no they shouldn't they already have two teams!!!!!!!
79343
india on its current form????????....(wat form..cos they beat sri lanka..lankans r the worst team in the world and were about to loss the series to Proteas..wat the helll r u talking abt...current form?) must b joking..its australia, blackcaps, england, and pakistan (underdog they really do have a chance and well they r really playing well and may b west indies, but considering them is just a wishful thinking...well if u really ask me.i think if english can defend the ashes, they will b on a high and caribbean wickets do help fast bowlers, and remember the last time english were in carribean they caused havoc with there bowling fire power..so its all about ashes..and the english have all the ammunition tht will b needed to win the game...or it can b the aussies cos if aussies loss the ashes or win...thy r gonna come hard cos and they r gonna make sure there is no one to question them...Poms or Aussies