really appriciate it, if some1 can spend few minutes explaning this. thank you.?
481038
His argument would be that he based his decision to give you a reduction on information that you provided him that was later revealed to be false or exagerated. So he is the victim of your fraud and should be awarded damages which is the amount of the reduction he allowed you. This argument may very well impress a judge or jury if you choose to have one.\n(Setting aside the Matter of proof)\n\nYour best counter argument seems to be that you sincerely believed that the heretofore unrevealed but known by him competition was causing you to fail. (mostly due to the debt load of the purchase price) The fact that you later succeeded proves that you were right about that. Both of you must have expected or hoped for this result when you agreed to the reduction, otherwise you would have just got a rescission and got all your money back for fraud and not tried to continue. He cannot now claim that his worthwhile efforts to prop up your failing business by reducing the debt was not the reason you finally overcame the competition and did not fail completely. The adjustment you both made worked as planned.\n\nSo if you can prove to a jury that you were not lying to him when you told him the cost was too high to compete, you will probably win. If you convince him of the likelihood of your case winning, he should quit or settle cheap. Only a fool want to go to court with a losing case.\n\nAlternatively, if your ultimate success came as a result of market conditions improving, then that is your benefit only for being in the business at the time of the business market conditons improving. It is not as a result of his reduction in price. It is not connected with the fact that he did not tell you about the other competitor.\n\nIf  the later success is a result of your improving your marketing efforts or methods, then that too should be exempt from his sharing in your business proceeds as it comes from your effort and brains, not his reduction in price.
164798
Hi I cant help you on this one, but do like some of your questions. Keep up the good work.
602700
Can you clarify your question? It is very hard to understand.\n\nThanks
123518
Hi, the link below will explain things for you... sorry for the canned response....
1148119
Its hard to understand ur question , please add  some more detail ..
53838
I'll be glad to help. Could you provide more detail? Do you remember any examples of the (something ridiculous) that I could work with? Thanks. If you can get me more details I'll edit my answer if I find something.
700797
Whoa, now that is a huge topic that would be impossible to explain in a simple answer. But I got an an idea... open your text book and read the answer, it will certainly explain it better than what can be said here.
629084
huh?....explain urself on this one?
1091569
could you expand the question please?
984612
heres a detailed answer and definition, good luck
280308
u can get answer at www.howstuffworks.com\nok, if u get yr answer, then let me know,if don't get it then also let me know.
1043982
Click this link for a thorough explanation.\n\nHope it helps. :)
157576
In the textbook you got the question out of. Read it! LOL
532490
go to this site, its very good,\n\nit gives clear explanations and statistics
771697
Try Google or Yahoo.  You'll find worked examples there.  I think it needs diagrams to understand; they and the accompanying explanations are too complex to attempt to reproduce here.
45252
Ok, I could find very complicated explanations and then I found this one.  Hopefully it will help.  Read it carefully.
193486
um. i think i just helped you with this. your other question. sorry it was kinda slow but   i didnt see it till now.