What is the different between terrorism and Resistance ?
486448
G.W. Bush calls "The Resistance" "terrorist" in Iraq. Or sometimes "the insurgency". The truth is that they are mostly fighting for control of the oil. All who fight the USA in Iraq are not terrorist. If China were to invade the USA as we invaded Iraq then I would fight to the death. I would not kill myself to kill others, that's a terrorist act. I would want to live to fight another day and "resist" longer.\nA terrorist will never fight our service men face to face, they know better. Terrorist do the dirty work behind your back. That's is why we lost 58,000 in nam.\nBTW, The NSA has recorded this question and all answers. They also have your old phone records. Do you feel safer now? I also read today they have pictures as small as 3.3 ft. of you in your back yard cooking hot dogs.
195797
Terrorism is only terrorism, which ever side you remain. Killings  innocents in World Trade Center, At London Railway stations or in Delhi crowded Markets are always terrorism which ever side you are. F-16  are bombing remote villages because terrorist are hiding there.
602872
Terrorism is the most critical issue facing our world today. To strengthen and augment our government’s current antiterrorism efforts, we urgently need a more fundamental approach that neutralizes the very basis of terrorism, preventing terrorist attacks before they begin.\n\nAn approach—known as the Invincible Defense Technology—calls for the establishment of a permanent group of 40,000 experts in “technologies of consciousness” to neutralize the acute ethnic and religious tensions that fuel violence and social conflict, effectively disarming terrorism at its basis. This approach is an essential component in any comprehensive approach to combating terrorism.
21537
its a part in the battle against terrorism
974646
I am confused and I don't know how to answer your question, because I believe that "all muslims are not terrorists" as much as "all terrorists are muslims"..
887677
Instilling fear in people is terrorism, eg. "shock and awe", "all options are on the table".  \n\nAnyone who uses force or the threat of force to coerce others into compliance and obedience is a terrorist.  \n\n"War is terrorism practiced by the rich.  \nTerrorism is war practiced by the poor."\n- unknown\n\n\n.
482405
Is not considered but it is. You own people which you treat bad and beat them or even if you want you could kill them. That is terrorism because you are attacking people that do nothing against you.
316259
the greatest difference between religious and non-religious terrorism lies in the fact that religious bigots are able to brianwash the peoples minds on religious pretexts. this has become more dangerous as they see no reason. this is greatest threat from such dirty minds.\nthough terrorism in any shape is unwelcome but in extraneous situations at least other half is able to see reason or give credence to ideas.
527579
Terrorism is an extreme act in opposition to something or someone you personally value.  \n\nThe "legal right to fight against occupation" is an extreme act in support of something or someone you personally value.\n\nOne person's patriot is another person's terrorist.
673291
What does a terrorist look like?\nAre we backing this terrorist's country at this time?\nWhat can I do as an individual to help stop terrorism?\nWhat is the definition of terrorism?\nCan the CIA, NSA, or the FBI win the war on terrorism
835060
Sure\nu can collect detail about terrorist and terroism in following links\nwww.terrorworld.com\nwww.truetalibans//wars.com\nww.rdxterrorist.com\nand also wikipediya of terrorist\nall the best
629755
have no idea soz look onto \nhttp://uk.search.yahoo.com/search?fr=fp-tab-web-t-1&ei=ISO-8859-1&p=What+is+the+differences+between+Maoists%2C+Naxalites+and+also+the+terrorist&meta=vc%3D
1088391
Terrorism:\n  A word the United States government tells its media to say when the freedom fighters of the invaded country try to win back what the U.S. wants to push its totalitarian regime(new world order) on the invaded country,other state,local municipalities. in other words it is someone who has a pair and gives all and is willing to fight to the death to regain lost ground and does not want what the U.N. pushes.
205378
Terrorism = acts of violence commited against non-combatants (that includes civilians and auxiliary military personnel and any military that's not actively involved in an open armed conflict) with the purpose of harming the psychological balance of the enemy (basically seeding terror within an opponent's ranks).\n\nThe men fighting US and UK in Iraq (and elsewhere where US and UK have troops on soil other than their own) are basically freedom fighters. But when they employ tactics that are ment to seed fear rather than obtain tactical advantages over a declared enemy, that makes them terrorists also.\n\nHowever even here there's a fine line as some freedom fighters commit terrorists acts others don't. The difference is even more obscured by the fact that US declared a war on terror and if such a notion is to be taken seriously (though normally it isn't enough to just say you're at war and actually considered to be at war lawfully) then the attacks against US personnel in Iraq can't be considered terrorist acts, since it's war.\n\nIf another country occupied mine I would fight by any means I see fit. There is only one justified reason for occupation and that is if the occupied country has requested foreign military intervention through recognized representatives that speak for an accepted majority of the country. Sometimes the UN can authorize military intervention on a country's soil if that country has commited repeated acts of aggresion against UN members or the violent conflict within a country threatens the territorial integrity of a UN member. If my country would be at fault for any of these, I would join the occupation force (which wouldn't be called an occupation force anyway).\n\nAs such, the US presence in Iraq isn't justified and is also illegal. The US campaign there was accomplished with the use of lies, deception and acts of terrorism performed by US military (attacks against civilian population, economic embargo even of humanitarian products, the 'oil-for-food' extorsion attempt - some which were conveniently called mistakes, a very unbelievable excuse from the most modern army in the world which also claims high moral principles).\n\nAgain, as such we can identify two types of terrorism: classic terrorism (performed by international organisations such as Al-Qaeda or national such as ETA or IRA that usually employs physical violence: guns, bombs, etc) and neo-terrorism (or state-terrorism - performed by a nation against another, state-endorsed which employs methods of economic coercion, indirect violence against civilian population such a economic embargo, high prices for food and water, etc commonly performed by US, Israel and sometimes China outside of international lawmaking agencies such as UNESCO and UN).\n\n--- to bungiebabe (edit): it will be a challenge to find the source which I copy/pasted simply because it doesn't exist. All answers I give come from my personal experience and research (I am correspondent on Middle East issues for some newspapers in my area, which is why I tend to answer this type of questions) and sometimes I credit Noam Chomsky and Annabel McGoldrick for quotations, but I don't copy paste. My main source is, as always if you've followed my posts, www.un.org and the UN list of General Assembly resolutions and Security Council resolutions.
1072218
terrorists are reactionists. retribution is the motive.
846976
Homeland security is intended to protect the country from terrorism.  However, the fight against terrorism entails an intrusion into private records and bank accounts in order to identify terrorists and their supporters which is a tradeoff for civil liberties considering that innocent persons might be breached.
805219
I believe Bush is different from terrorist.  They are fighting the only way they can to try and free their countries from our economic and military domination, fighting for their homeland and families; and Bush is making our young people fight, die and kill innocent people for oil profits for the wealthy.