Why are Conservatives hoping that Communist China will nuke America?
481360
APPARENTLY YOUR FIRST THREE RESPONSES WERE MADE BY BUSH CONSERVATIVES....YOU CAN ALWAYS TELL... THEY CHANGE THE SUBJECT TO SUIT THEIR NEEDS...AND THEN ATTEND CHURCH WHILE \nTHEIR LOVERS ARE SITTING IN THE BACK PEWS WITH THEIR WIVES/HUSBANDS...SUCH HYPOCRITES....!!!  YOU REALLY RILLED THEM UP...MAYBE THEY WILL FORGET TO TITHE THE CHURCH NEXT SUNDAY..!!! OR THEY WILL FORGET TO ANSWER ON THE NEXT SURVEY HOW "WONDERFUL" MR.BUSH IS DOING..!!
604753
to "unite" the world under communism.  Now the largest remnant (Russia) just wants to annihilate the US (although they won't admit it publically until they pull it off).
247514
The biggest one is BUSH borrowing funds from Communists to add to our national debt. China is Communist, and that would have been treason several years ago, well not so many years ago, with Regan or even Clinton.
241416
China has always been a threat.\n\nNuclear weapons do not increase that risk.  They provide balance that results in a healthy trade arrangement.
357423
No, they cowtow to the Chinese Communists in China.  They self-censor to please the Communists.
115391
One way to structure an answer is to look at the resources the United States had and now has to deter Communism abroad. During the Cold War vitually our entire military capability was focused on deterring the Communist threat to the U.S.  Today in spite of 1.5 Communist nuclear equipped countries (China 1.0, N. Korea .5), virtually none of our defense budget is directed against this "threat".  Economic globilization has (since the wall came down in Germany) and will continue to "protect our six" from Communism
64982
Conservative thinking is about making the ordianry people feel surprised about the things you mentioned. For them is all part of a plan which is to get filthy rich by exhausting resources all over the world.
856973
One would have to be a hardcore communist to think that those news media organizations you listed above have a conservative bent.\n\nThey are very much liberal.
1144258
The families and relatives of the terrorists would have been slaughtered in horrible raids, and many innocents would have been killed as collateral damage. No one would have questioned China's motives or tactics because, after all, freedom of speech is not a right of the people there. And Chinese leaders do not tolerate criticism too well. \n\nChina may have also seized the opportunity to topple Saddam and seized the oil fields. Their economy is starving for energy. Here is Saddam, there is the oil ... all we need is a bit of an excuse and there he goes and here we go. Michael Moore and others project this motive on the US for going into Iraq. If we really went in there to seize the oil, why can't we get any? Oil prices have surged in the last couple of years, primarily due to China's growing appetite for energy.\n\nI'm not sure China could have taken out Saddam on their own. So maybe that is the only reason they opposed the US for doing it. They wanted the oil for themselves.
1098193
usa scared of North Korea :) b'coz it's not poor country such as Iraq or Afghanistan.if usa do something,China erase usa from history,from map,from earth :)
366405
The Sino-American War will happen in the next 20 years. It will involve nuclear weapons. Invading China isn't feasible.  That's also a bad battle plan, because the longer we wait, the stronger China gets.
124824
Communism and Marxist theory is no longer considered to be a threat, mostly due to the Soviet Union's fall from power. China is the last large Communist nation and has the fastest growing economy in the world.\n\nAlthough communism has given socialism in general a bad name, many Western European countries have been able to effectively utilize various socialist ideals in capitalist societies. Unfortunately, Americans still feel somewhat threatened when hearing the label 'socialist.' \n\nThe problem with communism wasn't its connection to socialism; the spread of communism became a problem due to fascist regimes and movements. Fascism is a current worldwide threat, in addition to existing societies based on religious fundamentalism.
948132
i don't know what percentage of americans would consciously support a socialist economy, but the jokes already on them...  we're not completely capitalist, and if we were it wouldn't be long before the next great depression...  people don't know the definitions and the models political scientist have made.... so I will demonstrate....\n\n                       America\ncapitalism ----X-------------------------- communism\n      (this dotted line in between represents socialism)  \n\n      X marks the spot, that's roughly where we are in this spectrum... personally I'd like to find us somewhere in the middle, but the holier than thou, devout conservatives don't like the idea of socialism because they want to keep all their hard earned money for themselves, understandable, but not very charitable, sociable, or Christian.   And you know how liberals are supposedly Godless, so that must make conservatives Godly?  HAHAHA!  Start acting like it....
767693
Yeah...... wouldn't suprise me! but if the U.S.A. is going to be communist: They better prepare for a civil war! cause I know of alot of people who would rather die than give up their freedom! If our government would try communism they would be overpowered by the people! and our military service men and women would be wiped out by civillians. They aren't that stupid! Thats suicide! And they won't nuke us because they would destroy themselves in the process sense they would be bombing their own country! A civil war against the American people would result in the death of all government branches. Civilians would be taking over the white house.
1127913
Yes. Americans are afraid of anything that they don't understand. And those under 18 seem to understand just as little. \n\n I dont really think there ever has been a true communist nation - just a bunch of capitalist-monarchists who called themselves communists.  Funny....Some Americans (and others) will say the communist ideal is good but not practical cause its never worked HOWEVER democracy is a good idea too - but we've never had a true democratic nation either and the faux democracies of our world  have not "worked" either. \n\nSo hmm....whats more practical? A communist gov't to train the people into caring for each other so that eventually they will be capable of making the right decisions - OR an immediate "democratic" government which gives the selfish people the ability to make decisions on their own before they have been educated enough to wipe away the influence of humanity's self-destructiove history? \n\nThere is a reason that there is a minimum voting age in most nations - it is the same reason that communism is a necessity for a true socialist world - a world where one hand helps - not hinders the other.
248685
To the U.S.A of course they think that China is a threat because Americans dun wanna get robbed of their leading position in military, economics and technology in terms of world standard.\nIn my opinion it will be worse than USA in the sense that it will be less involved in world's politics. For instance poking into other countries business. Then we wouldn't have a WORLD LEADER to lead the world in the so called(right way).You may think that its not good to poke into other people's business but the fact that is that someone must lead the world just like how the father decides in a family otherwise the world will be even more disorganised. Again then China will then be a threat to not only the USA , but also to the WORLD.
1028838
Modern liberalism in America isn't communism, it's more like socialism. They just think they can fool people by not using the word "socialism". Unfortunately a lot of people are fooled. Fortunately most liberals are either too baked or too busy protesting something on election day.