Does Bush know who the President of Pakistan is yet ?
493611
It's on his speak and spell now, so he is ok.
808111
The president is George W. Bush.
542190
George W Bush has one
858922
i think it is bush and bin-laden. not america. dont get us confused.
857986
yes\n\nhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2005/10_october/06/bush.shtml
347184
BUSH IS GOOD FRIENDS WITH THE BIN LADEN FAMILY.\n\nBUY OR RENT FAHRENHEIT 9/11.
509929
Is this a trick question? George W Bush that's who!
897153
laden is in pakistan and bush in U.S.A
392048
He is the best option for that country at this time. The House of Saud is horrible, but who could take their place and be open to dealing with the free and civilized world?\n\nMusharraf has done everything we needed him to do, but not even he has complete control over all elements in his government.  He's really had to do some work with his secret police, the IIS as that they were essentially protecting Bin Laden and it has been infiltrated by Jihadists, of which he is certainly not. \n\nthe following was a free post from Stratfor.com\n\nGeopolitical Diary: The United States, Pakistan and Musharraf\nApril 07, 2006 03 56  GMT\n\nU.S. Assistant Secretary of State Richard Boucher has said the United States wants the Pakistani military to come under the control of a civilian leadership, a Pakistani daily reported on Thursday. This statement is a dramatic turn of events, especially considering the history of U.S-Pakistani relations since the 9/11 attacks. \n\nIslamabad's unique position as the second home of al Qaeda -- coupled with a perception that President Gen. Pervez Musharraf alone could prevent the country from falling into the hands of radical Islamists -- kept the Bush administration from assuming a tough position against the Musharraf administration, even though Islamabad's cooperation against al Qaeda, from the U.S. point of view, has remained subpar. Perhaps even more significantly, the Bush administration has chosen to overlook the fact that the world's only nuclear-armed Muslim state is ruled by a military leader, even amid its wider push for democracy in the Muslim world. \n\nNow, however, it appears that the United States wants to correct not only the political aberration that has allowed Musharraf to hold two offices -- the presidency and military chief of staff -- simultaneously, but also that there is a concern about the political role of Pakistan's military establishment. Put differently, as the internal pressures against Musharraf mount, Washington is working toward a political order in Islamabad that can help to contain the instability stemming from the imbalance in civil-military relations.\n\nThe Musharraf regime always knew that at some point in the war against the jihadists, the United States' focus on Pakistan would degrade from the level of strategic interest to tactical concerns. The Bush administration, it appears, has just begun to take stock of the notion that Musharraf's indispensability is a myth -- thus, Washington's shifting posture toward both the Musharraf regime and Pakistan itself. \n\nThe key to understanding this situation is the fact that the focal point in the U.S.-jihadist war no longer is South Asia, but is now the Middle East. Capturing jihadist leaders such as Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri and Mullah Mohammed Omar remains a priority for the Bush administration, but as time goes by it has become clear that the jihadists' strength has been reduced -- to the point that al Qaeda now seems to be, at best, a regional player, and largely unable to carry out meaningful attacks, even on its own turf. \n\nSo, then, how does Pakistan figure into the U.S. geopolitical calculus now? The Bush administration is realizing that rocking the Pakistani boat will not lead to instability of unbearable proportions. After all, political instability has been a defining characteristic of Pakistan since its founding, but the state has not collapsed. More importantly, radical Islamists -- hype notwithstanding -- lack the means to seize control of the government. \n\nPakistan has been ruled by the military on and off for half of its nearly 60 years in existence. During the other half of its history, there have been as many as 17 different civilian administrations. One military dictator was forced out of office by mass demonstrations in 1969, while the second had to leave office after the 1971 territorial division that created what is now known as Bangladesh. The third was
478653
smart answer from ITGUY...\nthat's correct... I think Bush sends Bin Laden Christmas presents! Bin Laden is Mr. X that Bush is using as a reason to attack any area he likes! But you'll never hear of Bin Laden being seen in North Korea.. trust me on this one ;)\nAlso Bush made sure that Bin Laden's family were escorted safely outside USA after 9/11 because he doesn't want to upset the man in case some honest FBI or CIA decided to question them.
63298
It is not Pervez Musharaff. It is Shaukat Aziz. He was sworn in as the 23rd Prime Minister of Pakistan. He was sworn on August 28, 2004.
648601
u should ask "when" but "how" ,"how" is Mr Bush's stuff which we haven't discovered yet...maybe
933589
USA has never changed its foreign policy towards India and Israel with change of guard in the White House. In 2008 also, when the country will have a Democratic candidate as the US President, nothing much is expected in Pakistan. As rightly pointed by some one, Pakistan is being used and had been used by UK and USA to keep India engaged and busy so that its potentiality of becoming another super power does not become a reality. With democratic government installed in Pakistan, it will be inconvenient to dictate. Individuals can be commanded and not leaders. President Ayub Khan, Yahya Khan, Tikka Khan, and Musharraf are individual Army generals and not peoples leaders.\n\nMusharraf will continue in power so long as the people of Pakistan do not shed blood to earn democracy. No pain no gain.
433364
You know, I've wondered that myself. Don't forget, Osama worked for the Central Intelligence Agency back in the 1980s when he was fighting the Russians in Afghanistan. I have wondered if they never dropped him off the payroll.\n\nAs to why he hasn't been arrested, even though the CIA knows where he is. It is because he is in Waziristan, which is in western Pakistan. The US government, and rightly so, is worried that an incursion into Pakistan to arrest Osama would destabilize the Pakistani government, potentially leading to their overthrow by fundamentalists.\n\nAnd as you probably know, Pakistan has nuclear weapons. Having fundamentalist loons with nukes is about the worst case scenario, period. So Bush lets Osama roam free because he wants to keep Musharraf in power.
1124021
no, but george bush is related to osama bin laden
194618
Bush says the India and Pakistan    have different history and different needs. Still people keep on comparing both.
164744
Ummmm...Bush?\n\nWhat's the question?