does any one know case in ccl4 and chloroform toxicity?
481451
Who do you want to knock out?
672813
http://www.psigate.ac.uk/roads/cgi-bin/psisearch.pl?term1=alkyl+halides&limit=0&subject=All\n\nhttp://library.tedankara.k12.tr/carey/ch4-2.html\n\nhope this helps
43062
No. Chlorine is highly reactive and as a result is not found in its free state in nature.
215160
http://www-ec.njit.edu/~skawinsk/chem243/chap11/chap11.htm\nthis may help–near the bottom
159821
Dear\nGOthrough this link\nhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=toxicity%20of%20securidaca%20longepedunculata%20(violet%20plant)&hl=en&lr=&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2006-01,GGLG:en\nu might get what you want exactlly
396313
Chloroform.  It's an anesthetic (or, used to be).
483391
I'd sure be cautious with any Methylene Chloride!  It is highly volatile and it is a carcinogen.  Nasty stuff!  I would first try a strong detergent and steam.  Steam will loosen a lot of compounds that you wouldn't expect to respond to heat and water alone.\n\nJohnny
230666
Chlorination of drinking water eliminated typhoid, cholera, and dysentery that were commonly carried in drinking water when chlorination was introduced in the early 1900's.\n\nHowever, there are some negative effects:\nI quote:\n"... the July [1992] issue of the American Journal of Public Health, researchers found that people who regularly drink tap water containing high levels of chlorinated hydrocarbons have a greater risk of developing bladder and rectal cancers than people who drink unchlorinated water. The study estimates that about 9% of all bladder and 18% of all rectal cancer cases are associated with long-term consumption of these hydrocarbons. This amounts to over 20,000 new cases each year."\nhttp://www.chem.duke.edu/~jds/cruise_chem/water/watinorg.html\n\nEuropean water treatment has largely shifted to ozone and filtration, and they have found it works. Plus the chlorine residuals are about 10 times less than in US water.\n\nAnother negative effect of chlorination is that it can create what are known as trihalomethanes. One example of a trihalomethane is chloroform, which causes an allergic reaction in about 10% of the population. Chloroform, or trichloromethane can cause liver and kidney damage.  Fortunately the concentrations are monitored and are generally quite low. One trihalomethane, known as dibromochloromethane is associated with cancer risk of one per million at 0.6 micrograms per liter. That's about the same as 6 parts per billion. The cancer risk of this is only one per million, but that concentration is barely measureable, and most people ingest large quantities of drinking water daily, so it is not as insignificant as it may seem. \n\nBromine is also sometimes used, either in addition to chlorine, or as a substitute. This is the source of what I believe are the worst hazards, such as dibromochloromethane.\n\nAnother chemical that is added to drinking water is fluorine. Fluorine is added in much smaller concentrations than chlorine, and does substitute for some of the chlorine so it actually will reduce the amount of chlorination. You probably get quite a bit of fluorine in your toothpaste, as there is almost no toothpaste on the market today that does not contain fluoride. There are some potential negative health effects of fluoridation, however, there is lots of evidence that in the concentrations in most drinking water that it is beneficial more than harmful. Fluoridation is added in about 60% of US public drinking water.\nhttp://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/fluoridated-water\n\nIf you are concerned about your drinking water I suggest you use an activated carbon type filter and filter both drinking and cooking water. Not all activated carbon filters are created equal. Here is a source that explains what they will remove and what they won't remove:\nhttp://www.ext.nodak.edu/extpubs/h2oqual/watsys/ae1029w.htm\n\nDrinking bottled water does not mean you have avoided this problem. Bottled water is regulated in the US by the FDA, and must generally comply with the same standards as public drinking water. In many cases it is better because reverse osmosis, or distillation has removed any potential contaminants. One trade-off is that water in plastic bottles will absorb small quantities of phthalates. Studies that showed that phthalates caused cancer in rats were generally  dismissed as not being relevant to humans. They are also known to be broken down in the body within one or two days, so do not pose a risk of bioaccumulation. I quote:\n"The CDC report is, in all, very good news because the trace levels of phthalates found are within EPA safety levels and therefore should not pose a concern for human health."\nhttp://www.phthalates.org/yourhealth/human_exposure.asp
1072909
1. CCl4 carbon tetrachloride is a colorless liquid.\n2. Zn is the most chemically similar to Cd, because the two elements belong to the same family or column of the periodic table of elements.\n3. Only B and C a representation of Bronsted-Lowry's Acid-Base Theory.  A and E (HCl(g) + NH3(g) --> NH4Cl and Cu2+ (aq) +4NH3(aq) ---> [Cu(NH3)4]2+(aq)) represent a Lewis Acid-Base reaction. D (Al2O3 +2NaOH(aq) + 3H2O(l) --->2NaAl(OH)4 (aq)) is a combination or synthesis reaction.
1150243
The easiest way to find out the answer to that question is to look up the MSDS.  It gives all the information you need about it's toxicity, reactivity, etc.  A lot of chemical supply companies have MSDS on their websites, and I think there might be a government website that has MSDS accessible online, but I'm not sure.
545818
My father manufactured the active ingredient in agent orange,(C-5,6), at Hooker Chemical's Montague Michigan plant for the duration of the Vietnam War. The process was so volatile and so toxic that it had to be manufactured on a seven story wall-less superstructure in the middle of a 160 acre field. All of the production was then loaded on railway tankcars for shippment to Dow Chemical of Midland Mi.for addition of solvents and packaging for shipment to the military. At the close of the war, the superstructure was dismantled, and it, and all associated equipment, tools etc. were buried in a huge clay lined disposal pit on the site. The site remains a Toxic hot spot to this day and all of the surrounding neighborhood has water piped into them as the groundwater is highly contaminated. From '82-'93 my father ran a chlorine plant's maintainence department on the persian gulf, about 25 kliks from Kuwait City in Saudi. In 1997 he fell ill with the small cell cancer that has become consistent, though unrecognized by our government, as due to exposure to AO or its components. I know this as I was a service officer for the Am Legion Post here in my  town, and have seen the wreckage that this stuff left in its wake. I am an Non Combatant, US Navy, Vietnam Era vet, ( Commonly refferred to as a "rear echelon puke" ), who salutes and thanks you for your service. Hope you are well, and look forward to your Photo posts as you are quite knowledgeable on the subject. God Bless, Jed
633942
Alot of bad side effects. Quit now and your lungs will start to repair themselves.  I hate I missed your earlier question, but 16 drops = 1 cc/ml.,  5ml = 1tsp,             15 ml = 1 TBS... Nurse Stay RN, BSN
740087
It is Hazardous, and you should definitely always keep it away from children.  Ingredients contain Grapefruit Oil from its skins.  Usually extracted in Florida.  It appears as a yellowish to reddish-yellow liquid.  It smells very sweet and fresh.  It is an oil, therefore it is insoluble in water.  Its flash point is 111 degrees farenheit.  (Special Clothing and self-contained breathing apparatus' should be worn when fighting fires involving essential oils or chemicals.) - most information from hazard.com\n\nMost routes of exposure are from skin contact, eye contact, and ingestion.  It is non-Carcinogenic, which means it does not cause cancer.  No known medical conditions are aggravated by overexposure of this chemical.  No one to date has ever been overexposed, therefore the effects are unknown.  The chemical may be irritating to the eyes, skin, if inhaled and if swallowed.  If eye contact occurs, you are supposed to flush immediately with clean water for at least 15 minutes and contact a physician.  Skin contact emergency involves removal of contaminated clothing or shoes, and you are to wash the affected areas thoroughly with soap and water for at least 15 minutes, and contacting a physician is necessary as well.\n\nInhalation of this chemical may cause breathing to stop, keep the chemical out of exposure to fresh air for environmental hazard purposes.  If ingestion occurs, oversaturation by drinking plenty of water is essential, and a poison control center or physician should be called immediately.\n\nIt will not undergo Hazardous Polymerization and is stable- will not react violently with water.\n\ndo NOT allow the chemical to come in contact with strong acids, alkalis, or oxidizing agents.  (CO and unidentified organic compounds may be formed during combustion.)\n\nLeak and waste disposal procedures :  Do not have around any ignition sources.  Must be contained in a ventilated area.  Recover all free product in case of spill.  Absorb the remainder of the vermiculite or other suitable absorbent material.  Self-contained breathing apparatus' are recommended for any major spills...  Report spills to appropriate authorities if needed.\n\nTry http://hazard.com/msds/mf/gsc/temp/md100295\n\nI probably should have just given that to you in the first place.
531493
"CFC's (CHLORO-FLORO CARBONS) Ozone depleting chemical, very harmful to environment. Mainly found in refrigerants, spray cans, ets. Not peanuts."\n\n"CFC has many electrons"
108256
More than likely a chlorine gas I would rec. NOT experimenting with the two. I work in the water treatment field. Trust me
37496
If you want an educated opinion, bleach in any treatment plant creates toxins that are detrimental to bacteria, aerobic or otherwise. The problem comes from concentration. You'll hear the argument that there is so much water/waste and that the chlorine has disipated that it makes little difference at the plant. Aeration at the plant further releases the chlorine. The problem becomes minimal...depending upon your point of view. There is also an ongoing argument that chlorine mixed with with organic materials results in creating trihalomethanes which are carcinogenic. Its a mixed thing. You'll often see water downstream from a treatment plant actually cleaner than upstream. Doesn't mean it will support tons of productive life, but by clean water standards, it is actually cleaner.
38192
This may help:\n\nhttp://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/cysticfibrosis_dc;_ylt=AmtZ7kdWjjnPPLPeMdUWbSSs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3ODdxdHBhBHNlYwM5NjQ-