circket  2 batsman 94&94 both make hundred but 7 runs to win the match 2 balls reamaning both makes 100 how?
487800
Yes. It's possible in more than one ways!\nMy answer is this:\nThe second last ball: Batsman-1 hits hard and they run 3 runs. When the third run was being taken an enthusiastic fielder throws the ball to one end, misses the stumps and the ball crosses the boundry for 4, resulting in total 7 runs. The team has won the match! BUT WAIT... The umpire is signalling one short-run (incomplete run), because during the process of running 3, one of the batsmen didn't once plant his bat properly inside the crease. So, effectively, they have scored just 6. Thus, although batsman-1 has completed his century, but the team still needs 1 run to win. However, because of all this, now batsman-2 in on strike (as they had ran 3). \nThe last ball: Instead of scoring that single, batsman-2 hits a six, to complete his 100. \nFinally, the team has won, and both have scored 100's. \n\nThere could be another possibilities also, but while deciding the best answer, please think practically and consider the tense situation also.\n\nThis same question was asked TWICE before by some \nÂ¦Â¥Â¦Â¤Â°ÂºÃ?Ã?Ã?Ã?ÂºÂ°... about 5 days ago. My answer was the same as I have written here (and some users have actually copied my answer here, without giving any citation!). \nBut, there that asker selected the following answers:\n1. By ThE FLamEe\nBatsman A faces the second last delivery. He hits the ball for a six, which is saved by the fielder in the deep. The fielder is just to lazy to stop the ball by his hand, and stops by his hat. Batsman A has already ran a run, and is on the opposite side. The batsman gets 6 runs, 1 he ran, 5 for penalty! Batsman A completes century. Now Batsman B hits a six on the last ball, thereby making his century and winning the match.\n2. By t_rex_boi\nEasy....the batsman 1 hits the first of the 2 balls and runs a single......the throw to run out at the keepers end misses the stump and hits the cap/helmet ( not worn) of one of the fielders/wicketkeeper. thats 5 runs so total scored on the ball is 6(1+5) and the strike changed as they took a single. the last ball is hit for a six when 1 run was needed.\n\nNow, my question is:\nDo you think in a tense situation like this a fielder would stop the ball with his hat? So, in my opinion, the answer 1 (By ThE FLamEe) is just a possibility, nothing more. The answer 2 (By t_rex_boi) is quite acceptable.\n\nSo, before deciding anything, think practically (although this example is a rarest of the rarest situation indeed). In a tense situation you can expect short-runs, over-throws... etc. Not that a fielder stopping the ball with his hat!!!
528302
Nobody has achieved it in international cricket - it has been done twice in first class cricket by Garry Sobers (Notts v Glam) and Ravi Shastri (Bombay vs Baroda), but both were domestic games.  No player has hit 32 or more in full international cricket, but both Ians Botham and Ridpath have hit 32 in an over playing for international representative sides on tour games (against provincial, rather than other national teams).\nYet despite this answer being up for hours, people are still answering Sobers/ Shastri.  Neither of those was INTERNATIONAL cricket matches, folks....
603603
17; 11 (fielders) + 2 (umpires) + 2 (batsmen) + 2(runners)
1058753
30 runs from 54 balls
733262
In Test Matches:\n\n1. While batting, pile up as many runs as possible with scant regard to run rate \n2. While bowling take as many wickets as possible with close-in fielders\n3. 5 batsmen+ 2 All rounders + 1 WK + 3bowlers\n\nIn ODI:\n1. While batting pile up as many runs as possible with a view to have a high run rate\n\n2. While bowling: Do not concede runs with defensive fielding\n\n3. 6 Batsman+1 WK + 4 Bowlers
575145
I am afraid that`s not correct.\nThe number of runs made is right but they were made in 45 overs rather than 48 overs.\nNow India will win the game no matter what the score is.
751132
My dear friend, it´s Steve Waugh who holds this record. He has 25 hundreds out of his 32 in winning cause.\n\nAnd as it was expected, Gavaskar holds the record for maximum hundreds in drawn matches. He made 22 hundreds in Drawn matches out of his 34.\n\nRawal.
692450
SIMPLE.\nSIXTH BALL OF 'X'S OVER..1 WIC.\nNEXT OVER FIRST BALL 'X' GETS 1 WIC. THE INNINGS ENDS AS THE LAST MAN GETS OUT.\n'X' GETS HAT TRICK WIC, IN HIS FIRST BALL OF THE FIRST OVER OF THE NEXT INNINGS.
828397
The batsman does not get a run if a bowler bowls a wide.\nIt goes only to the team.\nIt does not even add to the bowler's figures. But he would have to bowl an extra ball.
132643
Shastri hit 6 sixes in an over against Tilak Raj of Baroda in Ranji Trophy match while playing for Mumbai. He actually scored 200* in 113 balls hitting 13 fours and 13 sixes in that innings!!
796748
56 in odi\n34 in test\n90 in all
218406
remember, the match is played in mumbai, where there will be no assistance for seamers. And english spinners are not that good. harmison is not available. that means dravid has high chance of scoring 100
859550
LOL! Not much point checking that wikipedia link when he 's just cut & pasted most of it!\n\n\nA briefer answer, based on the fact that you understand how limited overs cricket works:\n\n..Unlike one day cricket, both teams have TWO batting innings each. The only limit to when an ininings has to end is when the batting side lose their tenth wicket, although a captain can also call an early end to his side's innings if he believes his side has more than enough runs to place them in a very strong position (this is called "declaring") \n\n...The first objective of the team batting first is to score enough runs to make the match almost impossible for the fielding team to win. Remember, they can take as long as they wish to do this providing they have at least one wicket left. \n\n...The first objective of the team bowling first is to dismiss the batting side for as few runs as possible, as quickly as possibly.  \n\n..Once the bowling side have taken all 10 wickets, the batting side's first innings end, and the teams change over. Alternatively, if the batting side have such a big total that they think the bowling side will seriously struggle to match it, they can declare an end to their own innings.\n\n.. so, here's an example. Lets say Australia go on today to make 560 all out. England then bat and make 420 all out. This means Australia would have a lead of 140 runs on the first innings. Australia then have their second innings, and make 300 all out. They now have a lead of 440, so.. England must make 441 in their second innings to win the match OR avoid losing all their wickets to force a draw. \n\n...Bear in mind that although there is NO limit on the length of \na team's innings, there IS a time limit in the match..namely five days. So a team has to judge how to pace its two innings and the speed of its scoring.. too long, and it does not allow itself enough time to dismiss the opposition, making it easier for the opposition to play for a draw. Any team which finds itself in a position where a win becomes unlikely ( like England at the moment !) will always try to avoid defeat by playing defensively for a draw.\n\nThats as simple as I can make it!
1047851
Twice. Once in First innings and once in second innings. He can get out virtually for third time, if he is running as bye runner for a batsman and gets out by runout. But, this will be accounted to the batsmen who is playing at that time and not to the Byrunner account.\nSo, Maximum - 2\nMinimum - 0\nPossible is 1 also along with 2 and 0
386667
actually  K the right answer to your question is belinda clark of austrailia who scored 229 not out(not 220) against denmark in mumbai in 1997.\nur question was a smart one i must admit quite hard to find these days\nin mens cricket its saeed anwar.
796911
118 out. Vs. East Zone vs North Zone at Guwahati. Today.\nCouldn't add to overnight total. Was out on the fourth ball of the day.
552491
shane warne -700 oidd wickets \nnext would be muthiah muralitharan,