I am looking for a cheep oil or any petrolic liquid to dissolve magnesium acetate or/and calcium acetate?
480971
acetates are ionic, and will more easily dissolve in water than an oil. thats your best bet.
966603
well, sodium chloride is soluble, so you won't be getting any solid product from it, but calcium carbonate is insoluble, so it would be solid. Calcium carbonate is what your looking for.
766925
carmex, it's amazing, you can get it from Boots (if you live in the UK) but vaseline is good too!
325235
You need to try something which dissolves oil but does not attack canvas.  Can you try a chlorinated hydrocarbon?  Carbon tet or trike might to the trick.  Try an obscure corner of the bag first though.
275122
thermal depolymerization is what you're looking for.  Water, heat, and pressure will do for the first step.  Reforming the produced oil, usually light fuel or #2 diesel (C14/C14+), into "petrol" (C7-C12 ?) is best done with zeolites.
244114
you could try petroleum jelly its tasteless and harmless and very cheap to.
295894
magnesium sulfate heptahydrate or MgSO4 . 7H2O
404775
Al2 (CO3)3\n\nAluminum Carbonate\n\nCarbonate salt used for oral ingestion to treat instances of increased stomach acid (acid reflux, heartburn) Medically: Basaljel
166236
I suspect you used Naphtha, a volatile liquid used for cleaning items and removing oil and grease. This is a relatively safe chemical with the exception of its high volatility and flammability. However, anything is possible and if you have doubt or issues, I suggest you see a medical professional.
322528
The LEAST soluble compound on the list is calcium carbonate. It is slightly soluble in water - solubility is about 7 x 10-5 moles/L.
1134850
http://www.google.ro/search?q=What+solvent+can+dissolve+salicylic+powder%3F&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
296910
try the petroleum companies... usually overseas...
371226
Calcium(Ca+²) and Magnesium(Mg+²)
373023
Ultrasonic cleaners might be the best solution.\n\nHere is an excerpt from the source listed below: \n\nAlthough a range of possible alternative products is available today, experience has shown that substitution of TRI is not easy and even not feasible for a number of specific cases, either for technical or economical reasons. For all cases, substitution of TRI needs a thorough evaluation of all process aspects. For this reason we intend to work with the authorities in order to prevent a blanket implementation of forced substitution, and allow sustainable and continued safe use of TRI. \n\nThe alternatives you will probably consider first are the chlorinated solvents perchloroethylene (PER) and methylene chloride (MC). They match closest the technical features of TRI, such as non-flammability, high solvency power, a wide range of material compatibility and excellent drying and recycling properties.\n\nBeside PER and MC, you have probably also heard about other alternatives such as aqueous (water-based) alkaline systems, flammable solvents (e.g. hydrocarbons or modified alcohol based formulations), supercritical CO2 or hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), etc.\n\nIt is impossible to say definitively which technology is best. That depends on your specific application, on what you are cleaning, which materials you want to remove, the cleanliness required, the variability of the parts cleaned, the throughput to be achieved, the cycle times, etc. \n\nFor example, for the cleaning of parts between two water-based manufacturing steps (e.g. galvanising), aqueous systems may be better, since parts are put into water phase again later and no energy-intensive drying step to remove the water is required. \n\nIf you need to have very clean and dry surfaces (for coating or surface hardening, for example) and if you have a variety of different metals or blind holes, narrow distances and very fine orifices or a lot of residual oil to clean, hydrocarbons or aqueous systems may not clean and dry well enough. In these cases, chlorinated solvents will offer most often the best solution as they are compatible with most materials, have a high cleaning power, are easy to dry, don't leave residual films and are easy to recycle with high quality by distillation. In addition, chlorinated solvents are today best suited to be used in modern closed systems with minimal losses. Their ecological performance has very much increased and, when used in well-operated metal cleaning systems, they outperform aqueous cleaning as long as drying is required. This has been shown by a Life Cycle Analysis carried out by Ecobilan. \n\nPER comes closest to TRI in technical performance and is often the first choice candidate as an alternative to TRI. However, it shows clear inherent technical differences, which need to be taken into consideration. On one side, PER offers a lower volatility and therefore is advantageous to minimise emissions in closed equipment. On the other side, PER has a lower solvency power and is therefore normally used at a higher cleaning temperature to achieve similar performance. This may raise concerns regarding the compatibility with specific metal working fluids and temperature-sensitive parts. \n\nMethylene chloride (MC) shows excellent cleaning properties already at low temperatures, favouring the cleaning of temperature sensitive parts. However, its high volatility makes emission control more difficult and requires special equipment.\n\nHydrofluorocarbons (HFC) and hydrofluorocarbon ethers (HFCE) are very expensive and show very limited solvency power. A thorough evaluation of the global warming potential is also required to choose the adequate product.
605041
water, rubbing alcohol or if nothing else acid :P(dont really do acid)
465476
Corn  or vegetable oil
104161
You could rig a "Dean-Stark Trap" on the side of your condensor. That will eliminate water from your esterification (assuming its similar to the Fisher esterification) and force the production of more water and product, until one of the reagents is used up or an equilibrium is achieved.\n\nAnother method would be TLC, comparing the starting reaction mixture to the final product.\n\nSpectroscopy (NMR, IR) could be used.\n\nFinally, you could just put some of your sample into a GC-MS.