Do I have a chance proving this case?
482992
1. If the court that would handle the probate is local go there and have the entire court file copied.\n2. Hire an attorney that does probate, have him/her review the court file and advise you of your rights.\n3.  If the court is not local, contact an attorney where the court is, have him/her copy the file and then advise you of your rights.\n4.  To answer your question as best I can, there are all sorts of rules that set out time limits for doing things in court.  Each state has its own set.  However, if you can show that you did not get notice and that you have taken action upon realizing that you had not gotten notice, most courts can essentially waive most of the time limits.  I've recently had a five year old judgment vacated based on lack of adequate notice to the defendant five years ago.\n5. Whatever you do, now that you have some idea that you didn't get the form, move quickly to assert yourself in court.
702945
this is gonna be impossible to prove , the fact is your car was there around that time , and you arguement that it was only a matter of minutes will work both ways , you say 6;59 she says 7;04 , if you go in saying you were there at 6;59 that is like admiting guilt ......... you are gona lose time from work going to court  and a letter is a laughable defense ....... just pay the cash and move the car at 6;30 next time
38665
The best way to prove it one way or another would be to try it and see what happens.\n\nHere's one explanation on why it works...\nhttp://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mwaterbags.html
98813
nope.  it's circumstantial, but icing on the cake if you get other evidence.\n\nget photos.\n\nif this isn't a leagal issue, then you don't need proof, just leave.  no need to deal with this situation if you're not married.
607457
I would say yes but you could be penalized for lying if it went back to court\n\nGood Luck and God Bless!!
12094
Possibly.  The FAQ on the link below should help you determine this.
405100
Possibly with a court order
109672
Find proof and contact the county attorney with your proof.  It will be up to them to prosecute depending on how much evidence you have.  If your evidence is insufficient, they will not prosecute.
85703
If it is genuine, I think it will be impossible to demonstrate it.  \nIf it is not genuine it will possible to demonstrate it.\n\nSo we will only be sure after they say that is not genuine.
368214
this has been on the news this week in the metropolitan Philadelphia area.  You certainly have a case regardless if you purchased the product or if it was given to you as a sample.  I'm not sure who you need to contact in your area, but if you do a little investigating, it shouldn't be too hard for you to find out.
418715
Well - you have to ask yourself - is it worth going to court for. Depending on how much money it is, you can either go to small claims or go for a civil suit. I'm nearly 100% sure that you can probably get them to settle but you need some type of documented paperwork. In a civil suit - its beyond a preponderance - so - as long as your evidence provides at least 50% - its not beyond a reasonable doubt. Again - i'd need to know more about the case - but in general - you need the paper work documenting what they said - otherwise it becomes a game of he said she said.
915419
I would listen to the D.A in this case. Unless there is absolutley NO proof or enough evidence, I'd say the DA knows what they are talking about. Bless your heart and I hope everything works out for you.
1107508
What evidence might that be?
613655
May depend on the state but... Basically you affirm under oath that what you say is true and did happen to the best of your knowledge. A court date will be set and it will be you plus the state or DA vs the defendent. You had better be able to prove your case in court and have been truthful in the warrant. If you weren't or etc. you could face civil suite by the defendent. If things are what you said then I would not worry and press forward with the truth. There are other things along the way... arraignment, pre-trial, hearing or trial etc. Depends on if the defendent pleads guilty.
77472
I would think anything is possible. Wouldn't it be in your case file? Have you had the record expunged? If not, you should be able to get it from the courts. BTW...just wondering, did you like that pic or something? I'm not picking on you, it just seems weird that someone would want to have their mugshot!
314023
You say you can prove that the politicians were involved- but why didn;t you use it in your trial so that you were not convicted??  If you are going to try and fight it now it's gonna be more difficult and you are going to need a great lawyer.  Be prepared to be riddiculed and harassed, amoung other things...\n\nYou need to make your evidence concrete- DO NOT USE CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE!!  Be prepared to fight and don't give up- take it to the higher courts.\n\nTry <www.wrongfulconvictions.com> it's a website that is based out of the University of Miami that run a wrongful convictions program- they investigate possible wrongful convictions and there are some great links on their site to other sources of information for you.
228353
Possibly something like fraud or perjury, if the elements are there and can be proven - very unlikely.\n\nIf it is proven that he intentionally lost a case, he will likely be sanctioned (even disbarred) and would be liable for legal malpractice.