What would be the scientists' interpretation to God according to what the Bible describes Him?
478039
I've read one time that the scientists saw God as one big ball of cosmic energy and that triggered to the Big Bang Theory which in turn evolve and created some creatures on what we called Earth.
338943
One word: Platypus\n\nIf that's not a mistake, then God has a GREAT sense of humor.\n\nEdit:\n\nAnyone consider that God just may be an engineer? So he creates the universe, but he doesn't want to have to make every little decision. A speck of dust goes where now? God has more important things to do than worry about the small stuff. So God figures out all the physics, math, and the other things because he's God, and then throws enough energy into the mix. His systems are all set up, so the big bang happens, and now he can kick back and wait for 24 to start showing (or something, what ever God does to pass the time).\n\nProblem is, sometimes you get a weird quirk in the system, it's not really a mistake because the systems still work, but it isn't quite right either. So God just let's it be.
1102706
One of the things that my Pastor always says is that the creation tells man that God exists and that man has a obligation to look for God also.  I think God is sayin that they don't have an excuse cause he made the things so they would know.    \nRomans  1:20  For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
1118945
Where do you see that description in the Bible?\nThis is the closest thing to a physical description of Jesus in the Bible.\n\nRevelations 1:13   And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle.\n\nRevelations 1:14   His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; \n\nRevelations 1:15   And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.
279136
Science=evidence, data, repeatable experiments, facts\nGod= believe, faith, intangible\nI am a biologist and I believe in God, not religion necessarily but GOD. You don't measure it, or test, or experiment on God it is something you can feel inside when you look at something you find beautiful and are amazed.  When you feel everything is going wrong but you continue, when you keep going on hope.
530815
An interesting point you make, and it is, indeed, true. During the scientific revolution, most of the scientists that participated in it were Christians. Isaac Newton, for example, had believed that his discoveries concerning light and universal gravitation had to do with God. Many scientists were Christians, and did not perceive science as simply an endeavour in which one attempts to legitimately answer a question. Many of these scientists were those who had viewed science as a way of understanding the mind of God. It was thought by many of these prominent scientists (Isaac Newton, Lord Kelvin, and many others) that, if one were to better understand the universe through science, they could see God in all creations and discoveries. In fact, during the scientific revolution, one scientist said that "Science is thinking God's thought's after him." This quote really embodies the basic reason for scientists' devotion to science during the revolution. God was the driving force for many of the scientists, along with interest and the spirit of inquiry.
177988
I agree and this is one of the most difficult issues that I have been struggling with lately.  Our ancestors of 2000 years ago did not have the science nor the technology to explain everyday events.  "Oh my gosh!  That glowing ball is back!  It must be a god!"  So, they named him Helios.  I'm just so confused as to why the Bible is still the end all, be all authority.  We've obviously made leaps and bounds in our understanding of the earth, our solar system, our galaxy and our universe.  Ugh!  I'm just so confused and find it VERY hard to follow with blind faith.
498678
Ancient Jews, first century Christians, and Jehovah's Witnesses understood/understand it to refer to the original prospects that God presented to Adam and Eve: perfect life in a paradise earth, with everyone practicing true worship. The Scriptures clearly teach this as the hope for the majority of mankind today and throughout history.\nPs 37:11 'the meek will possess the earth'\nProv 2:21 'upright will reside in the earth'\nIsa 45:18 'God formed the earth to be inhabited'\nMatt 5:5 'the mild will inherit the earth'\nRev 21:3 The tent of God is with mankind
537189
Jesus would probably say something like, "There's not enough atmosphere on the moon to blow the dust around".  Or, then again, He might not.  He might also say, "You need to pay more attention in Science class".  Who knows what he would say.
1009275
don,t worry some zealot will interpret the words of the bible to fit his beliefs-----dinosaurs existed and darwin was right---you can interpret the words in the bible or any religious book to fit your views---i believe there is a god---but not all the different gods that all these different religions describe---all those books were written by men!!!--they are not the words of god--they are the words of weak men-trying to get control of the people around them----it worked--
1071808
That's an awesome perspective, or interpretation.\n\nAccording to the script, "An Omer" was the amount God Himself told the folks to take for themselves, and that NONE was to be left in the morning...  So I guess that would be the amount needed for Moses to at LEAST strike a rock to make water shoot out for the People.\n(referenced at bottom, 1.)\n\nSeriously, though:\n\n"Manna" roughly translates to "WHAT (IS) IT?" in Ancient Hebrew, the supposed original language of the Bible.  \n(referenced at bottom, 2.)\n\nThe people had no idea what it was, just that it suddenly appeared, seemingly "from above".  They believed this to be a "GIFT" and ate of it.\n\nThe next thing you know, they're getting commandments directly from God Himself (all of which, in their original form, are profoundly simple and a good foundation for human coexistence)...  Sounds very similar to a Tryptophan-induced "revelation".  I've had similar revelations about The World, The Meaning of Life...  \n\nExodus 16:14 reads, something about a small round thing lying upon the ground after the dew was dried up.  There are types of mushrooms (tryptophans) that do indeed show up after dampness, and in the morning... \n(referenced at bottom, 3.)\n\nVery interesting possibility!\n\nGreat question.
942297
science is about measurements... and study of whatever things observed touched or heard... god in science cannot be quantized...\nbut einstein believed in one supreme being who made everyhting possible....\nothers say to see is to believe but a few say to believe is to see...
1065665
the bible is about philosophy and religion  and a history of a people.    It is not a science text book. it does not use empirical methods, nor does it require them to be used.  If  you believe in the Bible  it's because of your faith not your reason. \nA basic idea in science is that if light travels at  186 000 miles per second today on earth  it  also does in the rest of the universe both in the past and in the future and if oxygen has 8 electrons on earth then it also has them on Saturn.. These and many others are the building blocks for a sane reasonable universe.\nthose  who try to conform  the universe to biblical teaching  must out of sheer necessity  create a  crazy world  where a day isn't t really a day and a year isn't really a year and all of your reliable baselines are skewed.. it becomes lunacy.\nThe war is over ,Galileo Copernicus and Newton were right \nThe biblical version of the universe is wrong -give up
1025173
He was not an atheist... otherwise he would not have made this statement...\n\n"The sphere of religion belongs the faith that the regulations valid for the world of existence are rational, that it is comprehensible to reason. I can not conceive of a genuine scientist without that profound faith. The situation may be expressed by an image; science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." \n\n                                                                           Albert Einstein
725176
Show me how Psalms 22 was possible, and how life could have accidentally happened. If you know anything about creation science you must know about chirality of proteins and DNA...   Jim
289060
The Bible tells us Who. Science tries to tell us how (& there are many "hows" that science has figured out). Evolution is just a theory (not a proven fact), it is PoliticallyCorrect (so it is probably theologically wrong) - but it is an attempt to explain how God may have designed His creation.\n\nIn any event, the speculation is not worth much time or worry - it is not a criteria for God's Salvation by His Grace based on true faith (acceptance of His Salvation & acceptance of His Lordship, to be a disciple to seek to do His will). Scriptural fact:\n\nTrue Faith + God's Grace = His Salvation\n\nEvolution (or any other process of creation) is not a belief factor in the equation for Salvation. It doesn't matter if you think green is the prettiest color, or if you think orange is the prettiest color, or some other color - that is not a factor in God's Salvation, either. 'Faith + Grace = Salvation' is a time-tested formula - since Abraham - & it still works the SAME way. Because God is unchanging, His Word is unchanging, His Law is unchanging, His Salvation is unchanging.
26528
Wow... The best answer I've ever heard was given to me by the 19 year old daughter of my dear friend during her college interview (with me).  When asked how she reconciled her devout faith with the study of astro-physics (her declared major), she responded "I see physics as the study of God's creation".  I think that scientists are examing and exposing God's greatest and infinite wisdom.