Is there any truth in the idea that some women can only carry a pregnancy to full term of  one sex?
481605
In all my years of working with fertility, I have never heard this. There's no reason I can think of for this to be anything but a myth.
1143706
YES! my sister-in-law did when she was 7 months pregnant. She was fine and the baby was born 2 months later in perfect health.
867074
This is essentially two uteruses, yes? How far does the vaginal septum extend? I think the biggest issue is whether the man can penetrate comfortably (for both people) and is the septum so long that one ejaculation only stays on one side, and is that the same side that the egg for that month is on (remember that you only drop one egg a month usually and it will be from one ovary or the other). The other problem is that the baby won't have as much room to grow if there is a divide down the middle of the uterus, so it may not be possible to carry a child to full term. Is surgery possible?
586251
the earth's population is increasing every minute i do not see the reasons for having a big family these days. Everything is expensive too, so having just the one is ok to me, plus carrying a pregnancy for nine months isn't always easy and the birth effects people in different ways. One to me is plenty to be getting on with.
1185677
not unless they have 2 uterus's
665602
If you're talking about abortion it's allowed in the following cases:\n1-Continuation of pregnancy can lead to the mother's death (Where it becomes obligatory to do it, since mother's life is more important than the baby's).\n2-Any time before the 40th day, if it was proved that the baby will be retarded. Why the 40th? It was proved scientifically that the embryo becomes human (Religiously speaking, was given a soul by God)\n3-Any extreme necessities that requires the abortion. \nAny other situations it's not OK.\nI already said, it's believed in Islamic faith that the soul enters the body in the 40th day.
863789
I think you read about the theory that if you stop your periods by either pregnancy or pregnancy and breastfeeding, your chances for certain cancers are reduced (breast, ovarian)  the theory is that the less a woman menstruates during her reproductive life, the less chances of these hormonal imbalances.  The "natural" way to stop the menstruation (temporarily) or at least the ovulation is by interrupting it with pregnancy or breastfeeding.\n\n      But different women have different family histories and health issues.  For some women, yes, the pregnancy and birth will be too traumatizing  and they should not go through it too many times.  For "average" women a pregnancy is normal and healthy, and does not require a lot of interventions.  Not all women are like this, and some are better off to have fewer pregnancies.  Only a doctor can really tell.  \n    There are many drawbacks to having "too many" pregnancies (too many being different for each woman)  one is  the stretching of muscles leading to a possible prolapse of the uterus (can be helped or prevented with kegel exercise).
954175
Gal\nI think a guy could handle it IF they were able to be waited on hand and foot for the nine months, then have an epidural during the delivery. Oh, and then after the baby was born, they'd need another 9-12 months -at least- to "recover" and the woman would be required to take care of the baby -since he carried the baby for 9 months.  \n\nMost women can obviously handle it...... sometimes multiple times.....without any of the above "conveniences".  \n\nAnd I'm NOT bashing...... I'm just sayin'........
1136741
of course they can; anyone can have a baby. if the mother is O neg she may have to get an RH factor shot. I can't remember what it was all about, but I am O neg and had to get one becuase the father of my child was B pos. It doesn't hurt though. It is just a quick shot given at the beginning of pregnancy. Believe me; other parts of childbirth hurt a lot worse.
199067
of course it's possible. having regular periods doesn't necessarily mean that you are excluded of not being sterile(not capable of having a child)
1141760
I say it is wrong.  Each sex has different characteristics and feelings and attributes.  A baby need both a female and a male role model.
623644
Chances are against it, but yes, it is possible.  Try to go to www.scarleteen.com, they've got some expert advice on all and any questions about pregnancy, curiosity, your body, anything and everything under the sun.  It really is a great help.
493289
I am an alternative medicinal therapist and an ex nurse and I do know that it is possible to have this operation reversed. The odds of it working are low but it is possible.There are a few women who have had babies. In fact I know of someone that had the whole lot removed, uterus,tubes and ended up pregnant. Before she had the op she had intercourse with her husband, the sperm fused with her egg. After the op she had no womb, the little bugger attached itself to the wall where the womb once was and grew it even had a water bag around it.
414571
You give a good argument for pro choice, and to me, it's a refreshing one.  I am in agreement with a woman's right to choose but become less committed when the babe becomes a viable age.  I have worked in neo-natal units and clearly see that they are more than a "fetus" at 24 weeks (or less) of gestation. I would like to trust the woman to make a decision that is best for her own well-being, but with consideration of the unborn potential person she has created.  Unfortunately, not all women are so unselfish and generous, and even go so far as to use abortion as a frequent form of birth control, which disgusts me.  I have also had the experience of these same "mothers" not being fit to take care of themselves, let alone a baby, and one with the multiple health concerns that many premature babies must deal with throughout their lives.  This too, consumes the same, or more, of the natural resources you speak of and is also commonly a drain on society's welfare system.  \n\nSo, the debate continues.  Yours is a fresh perspective.  Thank you.
551712
If I understand you, you are saying that someone was carry a baby for another woman, however the women did not want the baby should she miscarry.  Morally no she should not abort the baby, however some miscarriages happen naturally.
925777
It is said possible but practically not prooved. It has never been done completly. Only until a specific state and then it was put into a utero. Especially not with humans as it is against the human rights. But technically it it the same with every mammal. But even it has not be done I strongly belief it is possible and when not now, then certainly in a few years.\n\nGreetings Dr.Seuss
739014
pro-life with exception for rape and incest which accounts for almost nil. By now after all these years of sex education, and condom handouts you would think they would know how to avoid pregnancy! Instead they use it as a form of birthcontrol.