who is the most exciting tennis player to watch?
493748
Sabatini i know she is retired but have you seen her when she gets real sweaty.wooow.
622241
Roger Federer is getting there boys.  He might do it.  Just keep watching, he might be the best in the world in the history of tennis in a couple of years.
634891
The best player - Federer
1186746
i totally agree.\nNadal is Hoooooooooooottttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt!\nHe may not be dominating the grass and hard courts but, he is definately the king of the clay. with a little more practice Nadal will be the King of all surfaces.\nNadal is the best!!!!!!!!!!!!!
199178
Since I have actually been asked this question before by some female tennis fans I will repeat what I told them.  The male tennis player with the largest female following is undoubtedly Marat Safin.  Since I was asked for my opinion I told them that David Ferrer of Spain had the look of a top male model.  To check on these players you can go to atptennis.com and enter their names for pictures.
988759
Yeah, Federer and maybe Henin - Ardene or Mauresmo!
164664
I think it is a tie between Federer and Agasi.
944674
Justine rules!  Very consistent, number one on the ranking with the very least number of tournament played.\n\nAs for american player, there is Sharapova.  Not quite but otherwise the tennis world will remain american free for an other 3 years I would say.
1127730
Bjorn Borg. In my opinion, Tennis has never been played as beautifully as was played by him.
702373
federer. even in pete's prime.
332805
You may not have been around during the moonballing era at the French Open, but that was surely the most boring of times.\nAs for today, the big matches are still exciting, but perhaps less so than a decade or two ago. The big difference, in my view, has nothing to do with your premise about modeling and acting, however, or about their focus. The big difference is twofold: first, players have converged on a single style of play with minor variations. That style is the power baseline, power serve game. No more McEnroes, Edbergs, Navritolovas. This means that we are usually watching less interesting tactical matchups.\nSecond, there are few of the intense rivalries of before. We had McEnroe vs. Conners vs. Borg; Graf vs. Seles; Evert vs. Navratilova; Agassi vs. Sampras. Right now we are missing the enduring rivalries, although I don't see that as a permanent situation.\nSo, on the whole, I agree that tennis is slightly less exciting than early, bur for different reasons.
519331
Federer because he is skillful
926294
I think Andy has to be in the Top 5. He just have to play consistently. He should be there when Davydenko turns off. He could still reclaim from James Blake the honor of being America's top tennis player.
485576
I think Federer is a great tennis player, but it must take a long time before he can be  as good and as famous as Agassi and Pete Sampras!
645557
Federer because right now he is the greatest player on the mens side only one man can consistenltly beat him the rest all fail when trying. he has class and is not crazy on the court and has the best game there is!!
557450
its a tough call........\nmy head says Nadal but heart says Federer.\nI'll cheer for Federer.
537595
Roger Federer & only Nadal can stop him. But remember, if he wins, he becomes the first to hold four grand slams concurrently. What can be more motivating?\nAmelie, Kim, Petrova, Justine, Martina, Sharapova......\njust take your pick! But remember, Amelie is playing at home.