does bush and blair attend church on sunday's?
482593
They'll show up in a church if it's politically advantageous.  It's a good photo-op.
425675
tomorrow at 12 and sunday at same time
1089587
Well for the readers, The Christians gathered on the first day of the week, to celebrate the ressurection. This is why most Christians go to Church on Sunday. \n\nHowever, Since Christians rest in Jesus, everyday is a Sabbath day!!!!
259832
Depends on the Episcopalian/Anglican. Some are more "Anglo-Catholic" which means they pretty much follow the traditions of the Catholic Church with the exception of following the Pope. Other Anglicans are full blown Protestants- John Wesley, the founder of Methodists was a life long Anglican and so you have those who never left the Church, but are de-facto Methodists.\n\nThere is a high degree of tolerance in the Episcopal Church so if you do or don't chose to eat meat on Friday, it won't be an issue.\n\nAs a general rule, no. But I know some Episcoplians who give up something durng Lent.
392547
it was a sunday, but I don't know if it was easter
623457
No, but government & the church are both forms of control by the "leaders".  Remember the church was against the printing press, because the masses could now look and interpret God's word on their own.  The relationship one has with their God is different.  Granted some individual's God is an object & who can defind what that relationship is.  It is hardly 2 way communication.
701648
I say I am going to church tonight and again on Sunday (twice).
179571
No; Christians don't worship on Sunday because of Jesus' resurrection. They worship on Sunday because at the Council of Nicea it was established that Christianity & Judaism must separate. Did you know that Saint Nicholas (AKA Santa Claus) was on this Council? This is where the ancient, Jewish Synagogue most Christians know as the Early Church\nsplit from it's Jewish roots. The early church was entirely Jewish at it's conception.\nThis council made very clear, deliberate rules to separate the Jewish practices from the Christian ones. The Church did start out worshipping on Saturday.\nUnderstand that in Genesis 1; it says the evening & the morning were the first day. It doesn't say from sunrise to sunset, but from sunset to sunrise! It reverses the way Americans view a day. This mindset is what differentiates the Gregorian calendar (solar) from the Hebraic (lunar) calendar. If you look in the story of David, Jonathan & Saul; it says they were celebrating the New Moon. Jews follow a lunar calendar, & their Sabbath is Friday sundown to Saturday sundown. This is the Biblically commanded holiday known as Sabbath; a weekly day of rest offered to mankind. Even the 10 Comandments say to honor it, yet Christians simply follow tradition instead of doing what the Bible commands.\nSo, Jews also worship on the same day of SDA people. From what I understand, they also keep Biblically kosher; correct?
1163349
Absolutely! He's ignorant and intellectually lazy, and what's worse is the fact that he doesn't care! In an interview with the BBC, the Welsh singer Charlotte Church talked about her meeting Bush. When she met him during a trip to the US, he asked her where she was from. When she told him that she was from Wales, he asked her what state that was in. She had to actually explain to him that Wales is a small country that's next to England! Bush is also quoted as having said something like, "I don't need anyone to tell me what to think, but I do need someone to tell me where Kosovo is." He's a stupid, gun-crazy, religious fanatic redneck and a walking disaster area. He's the worst thing to happen to the US, if not the whole world.
798778
The terrorist President has failed to alienate the Europeans, he carried all the shame on his head although some Americans too have been contaminated by him. What a shame on bush. Blair has no option but to carry bush's bag or the IRA Christian terrorists would receive new funding from the USA.
781926
I've been married 25 years and the way I got here was by respecting each other and that includes never putting demands in the conversation. We attend a non denominational church and I hear this dilema come up alot from former members of churchs that use guilt to keep their flock. I can't believe what I hear family, friends and even leaders in the church tell people should they decide to attend another church outside their faith.\nI do believe it is healthier for a relationship if you can worship together so I would suggest saying to your spouse that this is your choice but you would be willing to compromise.  I also wouldnt push my church on him though and expect all that guilt and pressure  to simply disappear, it won't.  If alternating isnt possible maybe  you can attend a service at a different time such as Saturday evening service with him and Sunday at your own church alone so your pleasing him and getting what you need in your life also.. Another idea is attending bible study classes or another growth class at your church during the week, keeping involved there and attend Sunday services with him but be honest and tell him your doing this. \nI can see this getting alot more complicated when children come into the picture so pray on it hard and seek council on it from your Pastor.\nFollow your heart because Jesus knows your heart and whatever you decide please don't give up worshiping him.
972733
Senator Barack Obama attends Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago when he isn't in Washington DC.\n\nMaybe you should check your facts and no assume.  \n\nNarrow minded or racist I can't stand either so please go take a nap and wake up smarter. Have a nice day
757543
no...hell no...Bush's desire to set up a plutocratic theocracy was stopped Nov 7...thank God!\n\n\nThe paranoia hasn’t yet burned down to embers. The term theocrat has become a commonplace, employed by bomb-throwing columnists, otherwise-sensible reporters, and “centrist” Republicans such as Connecticut’s Christopher Shays, who recently complained that the GOP was becoming the “party of theocracy.” And now the specter of a looming Khomeini’ism has migrated into the realm of pop sociology, producing a spate of books with titles like The Baptizing of America, Kingdom Coming, Thy Kingdom Come—and, inevitably, American Theocracy, the Kevin Phillips jeremiad that shot to the top of the New York Times bestseller list this spring.\n\nMost of these books aspire to be anthropologies, guides for the perplexed that lead the innocent reader through what the subtitle of American Theocracy calls “the perils and politics of radical religion.” There isn’t perfect agreement on what to call the religious radicals in question: Everyone employs theocrat, but Kingdom Coming also proposes Christian nationalist, while The Baptizing of America favors the clunky Christocrat. Others have suggested Christianist, the better to link religious conservatives to Osama bin Laden—and of course there’s the ubiquitous theocon, suggesting a deadly mixture of Oliver Cromwell and Paul Wolfowitz.
883
Many wish he would be.\nThe reality is , if he does ; then there would be great uproar. The American public would suffer, especially the working middle class and the lower bracket earners. \nThe woes would just be unbearable!!\nThe economy of the USA would be negatively affected or even bought down lower that it already is.\nThe fact is  : Bush is using the "Born again church" to his advantage.\nIs he a Christain - Very much questionable, no signs of it. Hah!\nHe is as much Christian as Bin Laden is Muslim.
51453
Tony Blair has caught a lot of criticism from his fellow countrymen, much like that other leader . . . George W. Bush.  The majority of his critics, like in President Bush's case, is from the opposition party to that which is in power.  Although I am not British, I have kept up with their news, and it appears that Prime Minister Blair is doing well.  The media, (remember it's the liberal media, while Bush & Blair are respecitvely conservatives), has been attacking both of the leaders for about the last three years.  Gee, I guess that's why the U.N. military commander in Bosnia is the "FORMER".  I haven't read any positive news concerning Bosnia and the U.N. involvement.  So, putting two & two together, the proverbial statement holds true, "Those who live in glass houses, shouldn't throw stones."  Or to reference the Word, "He who is without sin, may cast the first stone."  If anyone would like to forward this to that FORMER U.N. military commander in Bosnia, you have my full permission . . . . if President Bush or Prime Minister Blair are doing so poorly, then I'd like to see you do better!  Come on, you've got my vote.  I'm sure your response is something like the following:  "No, I don't want that job!"  Good, then sit back, shut up, fasten your seatbelt, enjoy the ride and just use sunscreen!  Sorry, I'm a history major and love to argue politics.  Although evidently biased, maybe it shed some light on your question.
275065
I, for one, shall pray - that the Good Lord shed His Light on the US President's path, for Bush is the United States' President, and our duly elected Leader, at least for now.\n...What is the harm in praying for our fellow human beings : especially, when they are themselves feeling down and out ?\nEven Jesus would have approved of it !
1080996
Most say no, the Bible doesn't say that Christians must partake of the Lord's supper every Sunday.  A small minority say yes.  \n\nI go to a Church of Christ, and I don't know if it is the case where folks believe that we are commanded to do it every Sunday or that we do it because it is good to do so.  \n\nThose that say yes point to Acts 20:7 as indicating it should be done every Sunday ("Now upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread . . . .").  But, again, the vast majority don't see any explicit teaching on how often.  \n\nA good article on this is at:\n\nhttp://spindleworks.com/library/aasman/lshowmany.htm\n\nThere are those out there who say the Lord's Supper should be observed annually because the first Lord's supper was at Passover time and Passover comes once a year.  I think this is way off.  The Lord's Supper is in rememberance of Jesus, not in rememberance of passover.  And Jesus said "as often as you will," not "at the same frequency as Passover comes."