What is the difference between the mongolians and huns the same  thing?
478044
The Mongolians were (are) from the country north of China (called Mongolia) and the Huns were from Eastern Europe/Western Asia in what is now Turkey (and that region).
1182640
They are both about the same. They both hate Jews, they both think they are superior to everybody else and that they are the only ones who deserve to live free. They both tend to be very ignorant of everything including what is supposed to be their own beliefs and sacred texts.
392410
Actually, amarsupials are mammals. They are a sub group just as is the other group that includes the platapus and echidna (can't remember the name of this group).\n\nThe difference is that the young is succled in a pouch. \n\nThey are born alive, not in egg, they are warm blooded, as all mammals do/are.
925169
mongolia is on the northern border of China, between China and Russia.
468947
The Hun were a war-like tribe from the region which is now Germany. They were one of the tribes which raided and eventually destroyed the Roman Empire.
117610
The short answer is, they are groups of nomadic people who live outside of conventional society.  The long answer is more complex since there are many different groups of gypsy travelers form different ethnic backgrounds.  \n\nThe source below should give you a basic idea of who they are and what the different groups are about.
603926
Khan (sometimes spelled as Xan, Han) is a title with many meanings, originally commander, leader or ruler, in Mongolian and Turkish. Khan also means a leader of a tribe. Presently Khans exist mostly in South and Central Asia.\n\nThe word is believed to be a contraction of Khagan (though that apparently means 'khan of khans'). It was known in Europe since the 13th century, when Mongol hordes overran Eastern and Central Europe, e.g. Latin chanis, Greek kanes, Old French chan; recorded in English circa 1400.
383520
I love to learn other languages. \n\nLanguages are the essence of culture and visa versa. One cannot exist without the other. This is mostly noticeable in languages which are still not effected by the onslaught of modern Western civilization. I speak several European languages where the mind-set and ideals are all basically the same. \n\nBut when you begin to learn languages that are not of the  European descent things start to change drastically. You find connections with nature and the world around you that have been lost or are lacking in the major European languages. Ways to express things in a whole different sense.\n\nI speak fluent Mandarin and have a BA in Mongolian language and literature, I am also learning Cherokee. All three of these languages do not fit into the European language category and are fascinating; but with that also comes the hard part, learning to understand and absorb the new ways of seeing things and different ways of expression. Each of these different languages has its own individual connection with people and the world around it. The Chinese language is very cut off from nature and sees humanity as the strong point in its expression. Whereas the Mongolian language is very much a part of the natural world in its strong and expressive vocabulary connected to nature.\n\nLanguages are fascinating! They provide us our thought process, our world-view and the way we perceive life in general. \n\nLanguages can be a hindrance or a mind-opening experience.
664016
the Chinese and those of the Steppes
1039685
they are spelt different
919523
No.  They were separate creation of God that did not survive the flood.  They were sub-human species.  They were not in the human line of Adam.  They undoubtedly lived along side man and had some of the same features and habits, but that is where the similarities end.
377294
They are not particularly closely related, but they are both in the order Rodentia.  They probably split somewhere between 65-55 million years ago (though some genetic studies suggest it could be much older).\n\nThey share characteristics of rodents: evergrowing incisors, 1 top incisor and 1 bottom incisor (per side).  They have no canines, the maxilla is a part of the zygomatic arch.  There are additional physical characteristics as well as genetic ones.
1166808
You already have the answer: geographically they are clearly one continent. So you can't receive a geographical answer unless you were wrong. But you refuse to receive any answer that is social or political. So you won't find the answer.\nJust in case: in many countries it is called "the Eurasian continent".
468722
They're different so do both.\n\nI don't think you can directly compare the two.
382304
they are humans just as we are. they just have different cultures.
507990
No. \n\nMongolians are the people who have had a long history that predates chinese.. They are well known for their bravery, short horses and fierce soldiers. They had a very good civilization with good arts & crafts. They were self sufficient people. They conquered and ruled chinese people for sometime... \n\nChinese were their neighbours who were huge in population, following their own style of civilization, arts & crafts. They had a different style of battling and fierce soldiers. They were mostly innovative in bring about many inventions and wining over mongolians eventually... \n\nThe scientific world had given a name called 'Mongolaid Race' to all the asians who looked similar to each other in the facial appearance, color, etc.. This has brought many confusion.. but hope u r clear now!
865907
According to the encyclopedia, which is very accurate here in this case:\n\n"A bovid is any of almost 140 species of cloven-hoofed mammals belonging to the family Bovidae. The family is widespread, being native to all continents except Australia and Antarctica, and diverse: members include buffalo, bison, antelopes, gazelles, and both wild and domesticated cattle, sheep, goats, and water buffalo."\n\n"The biological subfamily Bovinae (or bovines) includes a diverse group of about 24 species of medium-sized to large ungulates, including domestic cattle, Bison, the Water Buffalo, the Yak, and the four-horned and spiral-horned antelopes. The evolutionary relationship between the members of the group is obscure, and their classification into loose tribes rather than formal sub-groups reflects this uncertainty. General characteristics include a cloven-hoof and usually at least one of the sexes of a species having a true horn."\n\nHowever, the domestic cattle species Bos taurus that you see on farms is extinct in the wild. Wild cattle today is not the same species as domestic cows and bulls. Wild cattle belong to the same family and in some cases same subfamily and look very, very similar, but they are not the same exact species. A gaur is wild cattle of India. There's the Cambodian Forest Ox, several other types of wild cattle.