How many lives were lost worldwide during the Clinton Presidency due to his "distractions"?
493699
You forgot about Clinton's veto of the bill that would've made partial birth abortions illegal.  That law would have saved countless babies lives!!!!
867111
I am not sure of the number, however, there was one President,\nand I don't remember which one, whose entire cabinet quit.\n\nThank you very much, while you're up!!
484817
Hey don't forget about all the Americans that have died on "his watch"  as he likes to call it.\n\nBush ain't happy unless someone is suffering or getting killed.    He is slowly trying to make our lives a living ****.
964541
This is typically how a shameless coward like clinton fights a war.  From about fifty miles away.  The number of cruise missiles was probably less than a dozen, but even with that he caused an international incident and damn near WWIII.  It seems, Mr Genius and his intel group decided to target a building that his intel people said was one thing, when in fact it was the new Chinese Embassy!  Well the building went down, at least one Chinese diplomatic worker was killed, and the Chinese were madder than hell!  Naturally, slick willie climbed under the desk until the heat was off.  See, that under the desk routine of his, served more than one purpose.\n\nThis, I fear is the management style we can expect from the left.  As the saying goes, "Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it".\n\nTo the genius TOM, below.  I know it's no longer important that over 10,000 Albanians died as the serbs did their repeat of Bosnia, only because that coward clinton overruled everyone about putting boots on the ground.
558900
I can name four: Ford, Carter, Bush Sr. and Clinton. They are obviously not buried in the U.S. (or anywhere else) because they are not dead.
31296
as of 01/24/2006 reported us death in iraq due to the conflict were 2237 more info\nhttp://icasualties.org/oif/
744184
There is no definite answer to your question since the reported number varies depending on who's counting. The latest study though published by the Lancet medical journal in October 2006, suggested that about 655,000 people had died in Iraq as a result of the 2003 invasion. Quite impressive isn't it? I guess the argument for the war just went out of the window!
236981
Clinton was given the opportunity to take custody of Osama bin Laden during his presidency. Yet he felt it wasn't important enough to interrupt a game of golf. By the time he finished his round, the opportunity to take bin Laden into custody had passed. He didn't make a call, didn't do ANYTHING. And more people died as a result of Clinton's mistake than Bush's.\n\nSo, I ask, "What's your point?"\n\nCould we have done more as a nation? Absolutely. But during what disaster have we ever done enough. Don't forget that Governor Kathleen Blanco and Mayor Ray Nagin were all over TV saying the New Orleans and Louisiana didn't need any help ONE DAY AFTER THE HURRICANE. It wasn't until the backside of the hurrican hit and the levees broke on the inland side that they realized they needed more help.
872424
Wake up people.  The World Trade Center was bombed for the first time when Bill Clinton was in office.  Were you born in 1999 or something?  We did absolutely nothing about that.  The USS Cole (watch your spelling, hdchackz) was bombed on Clinton's watch - we did nothing.  9/11 happened less than 8 months after Bush took the oath.  It was in the works long before that - during Clinton's watch.  Don't try and blame Bush for that one either.
622360
Here are some facts you should know about past presidents. The world after them was fine and I think it will be fine after Bush.\n\n\nThere were 39 combat related killings in Iraq in January.\nIn the fair city of Detroit there were 35 murders in the month of January. That's just one American city, about as deadly as the entire war-torn country of Iraq.\n\n\n\nWhen some claim that President Bush shouldn't have started this war, state the following:\n\n\n\na. FDR led us into World War II.\n\nb. Germany never attacked us; Japan did.\n>From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost ...\nan average of 112,500 per year.\n\n\n\nc. Truman finished that war and started one in Korea.\nNorth Korea never attacked us..\n>From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost ...\nan average of 18,334 per year.\n\nd John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962.\nVietnam never attacked us.\n\ne. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire.\n>From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost ..\nan average of 5,800 per year.\n\nf. Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent.\nBosnia never attacked us.\nHe was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three\ntimes by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on\nmultiple occasions.\n\ng. In the years since terrorists attacked us , President Bush\nhas liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled\nal-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Libya, Iran, and, North\nKorea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who\nslaughtered 300,000 of his own people.
1020955
Of course Our people on the USS COLE matter, and yes I believe that the weakness that Clinton portrayed of Our country throughout his whole Presidency caused 911. He let those Muslim extremist kill Americans over and over without any retaliation. He was a disgrace to Our nation in my opinion!
999819
2500+....3000+ killed on 9/11.....58,000 killed in Vietnam.....200,000 killed in WWII....400,000 killed in the US Civil War......40,000 killed on US Highways every year.\n\nIn perspective, it's well worth it, IMO.
359169
It's actually a toss-up between Germany in WW2, and Iraq during Saddam's reign.  The longer we stay in the latter, the more mass graves are found.  So far the number is up to well over a quarter of a million.  Hitler killed over 6 million.  \nAnyone who says the US obviously hasn't read their history books...\nHiroshima and Nagasaki were both catastrophic...but as was said before,(maybe it was in another question) the US probably didn't even realize what the radioactive materials would do.\nIf they did, blame the Democrat that was in office at the time!  (Even though he was one of the best presidents ever...)
231212
I am glad Bush is mortal.  He would be the God of Imbecility and War Crimes, other wise.  I see a lot less people died on Clinton's watch.  Considering the things Bush has done, he has a reason to look over his shoulder.
1071050
Clinton........duh!!!
207385
this is really horrible... crazy presidents is driving world to become hill...in the other hands 200,000 Iraq was killed in this war.. millions of injuries..they loss almost everything ..their lives,their country and their families.. i hate Saddam Hussein and George W. Bush .
495503
What has "gone on" & is "going on" in our country has nothing to do with Clinton ! Hold him accountable for "gett'in busy" with a young (albeit, ugly) intern. Thats about it.\n\nAs for you being a "distraction":\n\n Surely 2 adults can act accordingly "at work"? Are you married?  Is he?  Are you guys "making copy's" in the copy-room?  It's OK to be friendly. Sounds like there is some sort of "attraction". It takes 2 "sticks" to start a "fire". \n\nJust try to be "Cool". \n\n\n\n\n\nHappy B-Day. I'm from the south. And I LOVE fishing and exploring. Wish you were going to North FLA or Southern GA. I could tell you some good places to get seafood & go fish'n. I have been to "Nawlin's" many times,(was born in P-cola, FLA).\n\nHave some "mud-bugs" & "gumbo" for me! BYE