Is Chris Matthews of MSNBC's Hardball a good and fair journalist.?
481224
Depending on your bias of course ,you wont see any news source not supporting there favorite stand.
348757
got to go with hannity....but i like them all really.\n\nthank god for them. do you remember 20 years ago when the libs had a monopoly on the media???
923506
Well yeah I think he is the man. Yes he is just doing a job but we don't know if to him it's more than a job. From interviews I have seen of him it's more than a job to him. Yes the people at peverted justice should be applauded as well. What they do is great. But with out Chris and Dateline they would not have the publicity that they have. So I say Chris and Dateline are the Shit!
529740
What an understatement!  A recent survey asked people in the media to identify themselves politically, and over 80% of media people said they considered themselves liberal.\n\nWhen I was a kid, I thought all the major sources of news (60 Minutes on tv; The New York Times newspaper, etc.) were all fair and balanced because they were established, venerable institutions.  However, now I realize the only fair and balanced source of news is Fox News (Bill O'Reilly, etc.)\n\nThe liberal media says something as if it were fact, and everyone believes them.  For example, they say we're losing the war in Iraq when every military commander says losing the fight on the battleground is impossible.  We can only lose the war in the media.  Elite Al Qaeda members have actually said the same thing!  Writers have already documented intercepted messages from top eschelon of Al Qaeda who flatly state that they have to win over the stupid American public because they can't beat the U.S. military.  You can find one of these quotes in the book on President Bush, "Strategery".\n\nThe liberal media blasts people with the same negative messages until people just assume the news is true.  Voters in Florida were leaning towards the democrats in the last election because the liberal media kept saying that that, due to the bad economy in Florida, voters would choose a Democrat for President.\n\nHowever, more conserative outlets on talk radio and Fox News' Bill O'Reilly pointed out how the Florida economy was actually in great shape.  Finally, the voters realized, "Hey, the economy here IS good.  The press just keeps trying to spin the truth."  Hence, Florida voted for Bush.
1047741
can't argue with having one less liberal in the media
1037699
he called that cub-loving-jerk-a** reporter a \n\nf  -  a -  g -  g  - o - t.\n\nand whats wrong with that?\n\nit was off the record, not aimed at gays, and the truth.\n\nOzzies the best.\n\ngo sox!\n\np.s.\n\ni had to spread the letters cuz answers tried to block it.
342708
No...but I bet there could be some good ones. I doubt reporters are allowed where the real speeches and decisions are formulated. By the people behind the celebrity congressmen/women
204315
I don't think that he is necessarily a bad president he just makes bad choices. His decision making skills are not good. I think the media personifies everything and makes everyone look bad. I guess its like with anything Else there are pros and cons. We just need to pick a president with more cons than pros and one that has a balance when it comes to the issues.
620464
Yes it is good for baseball.  He is one of the greatest players to ever see the game.  And hes a good guy.  Did you hear what he did for the Lexington team?  he bought them freaking plasma screen tvs and a bunch of couches to revamp their dressing room.  Hes a good guy, a good player, and he still has it after all these years.  He  could probably go 5 years if he wanted to.
717022
You think Murdoch has ethics? He owns Fox News, doesn't he?
367915
Saying Fox News is "fair and balanced" is like saying George Bush is a "compassionate conservative".\n\nYou don't have to prove that you are "fair and balanced", you don't have to prove that you are "compassionate". These "qualities" are meant to influence what people think your motives are. But you cannot prove what someone's or some industry's real motives are, that is why emphasizing motives that are actually the opposite of one's true motives is so effective at masking the truth. \n\nGenerally, when right wingers emphasize their "motives" in this manner -- whether it be to "liberate" Iraq, when in reality it is to control/conquer Iraq, whether it be "compassionate" when they are really vengeful, whether it be "moral" when they are really corrupt, whether it be "fair to all Americans" when they really favor the rich minority -- I assume their true motives is just the opposite, even if they are not themselves aware of this.
331853
I don't know if he is a good manager, because it seems like he's mostly been a writer, talker, and comedian.  But as far as I know he's always been truthful, and careful about getting facts and details straight.  He might be too blunt to be a great head of state though.
940767
msnbc has all day coverage as does cnn
1065660
I listen to him and he has some valid points.  By the way, he will be in Kansas City at Royals Stadium tomorrow!  I am going to try to go see him.
361688
haha, good one. \nBut seriously, I don't think he's bad. Just ignorant, which could be a lot worse.
981718
A lot of libs will forever deny a liberal bias even though a survey was taken that 9 out of 10 news correspond in Washington   voted democratic the true test that news is even handed if both sides complained about the reporting, but when was the last time you heard a democrat  candidate complain about bias reporting ,oh I forgot Fox which is the only station that will challenge both sides with tough questions.
941270
The thing to remember about Rush is that he's an entertainer, not a newsman. He says the things the people in his demographic want to hear, whether centered in the truth or not. Personally, he's not my kind of entertainer.