What is the probability of to have not HIV antibody at the end of the one year?
490269
According to WHO guideliness, HIV antibody should seen in the blood in one year. So it is possibile to not to see HIV antibody until one year. But it doesn't observed that tehre is no HIV antibody after one year.
709641
A certain percentage of any population will be naturally immune to a particular disease, including HIV. There is no way known, as yet, you improve your immunity to HIV and any attempt would entail great risk. Foods might help, but the risk is too great. Play it safe.
169268
Yes,ask your sex partners.  There's no harm in asking someone if they have had an HIV test.  That information can keep the both of you healthy.
23162
I'm not sure I understand your question.\n\nIf you're asking how long it takes (after to exposure) for a person's blood to show antibodies (or not) to HIV, then I think the answer is probably yes. If a person is exposed to HIV, the majority of people will develop antibodies to the virus by 6  months if they are going to develop them.
77336
If there was very fresh, HIV infected blood on the knife, I would say the chances are high. But more than likely, if he wasn't bleeding and there was no blood on the knife from him, you'll be alright. Definitely, get tested after 3 months and then once again after 3 more months.
389983
Because a negative test result likely indicates absence of HIV infection (i.e., high negative predictive value), a negative test need not be repeated in clients with no new exposure in settings with low HIV prevalence. For clients with a recent history of known or possible exposure to HIV who are tested before they could develop detectable antibodies (129,130), the possibility of HIV infection cannot be excluded without follow-up testing. A false negative result also should be considered in persons with a negative HIV-1 test who have clinical symptoms suggesting HIV-1 infection or AIDS. Additional testing for HIV-2 and HIV-1 group O infection might be appropriate for these persons.\n\nThis basically says that if your results are non-reactive, you are not HIV positive, but if you are still in a high-risk group (multiple partners without using protection, drug user, health care worker, etc.) you should retest in the near future. It also would be important that this initial test was done within the timeframe that it would be accurate, and not too early after the exposure.  I hope this helps.  \n\nIf you are indeed lucky this time, please be smart and take the precautions to protect yourself, your life, and the lives of those you care about.
2910
Three to six months from your last unsafe sexual experience is the amount of time you need to wait to get an HIV test. Depending on the source, you will get differing opinions about this "window" of time between infection and HIV antibody detection in a blood test. For example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends six months, some city and state health departments advise waiting two months, while the Gay Men's Health Crisis (GMHC), the oldest and largest HIV and AIDS service organization in the world, suggests a three-month waiting period. Alice thinks that six months is a long time to wait for HIV test results, and a negative or positive test result three months after possible HIV exposure can be considered reliable, although not 100 percent accurate.
716927
A girl should not be afraid of catching AIDS or HIV from a bi man who has unprotected sex with other men (or women) if he has tested negative in two separate tests taken at least six months apart and he is completely monogamous. Otherwise, she is taking unnecessary risks.
897396
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/basic.htm
761582
In average, HIV 0.3% x 40% Hepatitis B. But you may reduce the risk of HBV near to zero by taking the vaccine scheme. Unfortunately, there isn't a anti-HIV vaccine yet. The most important way to prevent every blood-transmitted disease lies on universal precautions in proceedings with potentially-infected biological materials.
1137935
no.only fluid in the body contains hiv.but only fluid like semen or breastmilk contains enough hiv to make the non-hiv infected
235630
that is EXACTLY how you get AIDS.  If you got AIDS you will have the virus in your blood and be able to infect others immediately, but you will not TEST positive for AIDS for 3 months or more, sometimes up to a year.  So if you just did something foolish, please don't spread it around!  get celibate and get tested in a few months.
54920
If the virus is dormant, it will still be detected by the test.  It's a bit confusing, but when people talk about the virus being dormant they basically mean it's chilling out in the patient's body but not making him/her sick (in which case the patient is HIV-positive but does not have AIDS).  The virus is not immediately detectable (I believe whoever it was that said 3-6 months after exposure is right), but a patient can have HIV that will be detectable by an HIV test for several years without showing any symptoms.  The risk of a false negative on an HIV test is fairly low (I don't remember the exact number), but if you've had an HIV test that came back negative and are still worried about it you can always get tested again in a couple months.
302604
If they did an HIV viral load than it would indicate that you currently have active HIV virus in your blood. There are other viral loads that could have been performed ie Hepatitis C,B,or A viral loads. So if it was an HIV viral load that was performed with a result of 600 copies or more it would generally indicate that the patient is HIV positive there is the posibility of a false positive. If it is the first test that has been done I would suggest a repeat analysis and an HIV genotype. And talk with your doctor about your lab results not us schmos on the Q&A make sure you know what you're being tested for.
156911
as a person that is HIV+ please listen to this... its not 6 months anymore. The CDC recommends 13 weeks but the ELISA and Western Blot test can detect the virus much sooner. Until you find out your results please make sure that you are protecting not only yourself but the ones whom you engage in relations with. And as far as Post Exposure Prophalaxis is concerned it hasn't been proven to be 100 % effective and generally is done with rape victims only.
53215
There may have been trace amounts of the antibodies in your system but not enough to determine for sure if you have HIV or not, also, it may have been taken to soon after contracting the virus, you should take another test soon. If you do have the antibodies, that means you have the virus, cuz antibodies are only present in your blood when they are trying to fight off something in your body. \n\nI hope things turn out right for you, GOOD LUCK
731389
On the basis that you were indeed asking for websites which the previous respondent seemed to forget, here is one that might provide some useful info.  It is my own site, a little in need of a pruning but has a substantial amount of HIV information.\n\nhttp://www.mark.lineisp.co.uk/hiv1.htm