Why aren't  all democrats send to Gauntanemo bay because they all support terrorists?
478546
You are either with us are against us! you dont believe in that do you? thats the same line we've fallen for for centuries. stalin, mao, cheng, wassalib, hitler, poipot, melosovic, il & leone have all used that to commit terrible things while in power. heres another slogan for ya, 'those who can be made to believe absurdities can be made to commit attrocities'.
1001294
Yeah I know whatcha mean, not to mention when Clinton bombed Yugoslavia we didn't have that many Republicans saying it was wrong.\n\nIn fact loads of Democrats and Republicans supported the Yugoslavia bombing but loads of the same Democrats that supported that oppose Bush bombing Iraq.\n\nHello why is it ok for Clinton to bomb and not Bush?
905043
Without bickering?  No way.  Can they come to a consensus?  Probably.  The Democrats are very beholden to the environmental lobby that wants no new drilling in the US at all, so it'll be a fight.  I think it's in everyone's interest to have ZERO depenence on anything in the Middle-East though, no matter what they must do.
924935
You got it!!!!\nThe Terrorists knew that sooner or later, the Democrats would come to their rescue.\nCNN showed the Terrorists dancing in the streets celebrating the Democrats big win.
653950
I think we went in not realizing that liberals in our country would support Abu Musab Al Zarqawi, Syrian and Iranian insurgents. Democrats backed these forces with their statements everyday. Ted Kennedy's statements end up in Al Jazeera everyday. How could we have stopped the Democrats from supporting the enemy? Good question! \n\n    Oh by the way, we tried to get the U.N. involved...the Secretary generals son, Germany, France and Russian were taking bribes from Saddam Husein in the (oil for food program) and would not vote on the counsel with us. France and Russia even gave tactical advice to Saddam while we were moving in on his troops. Don't hand me your UN crap.
749193
Is there ANYBODY in the house free of some sort of corruption?  I guess Nancy has to pick people who she thinks can do the job, but now she's realizing that corruption is not limited to Republicans.  Another campaign promise failed.\n\nI'm willing to forgive if this bunch can find a better way to deal with terrorism.  I'm not going to criticize, I put up with criticism for years as a Republican - the ball is in your court Dems!
961209
I agree that Democrats are weak and just want to try and appease and reason with everyone.  Unfortunately, you can't reason with a dictator.  They just want the power and money.  We can only do so much at once.  We can't even get the American people to realize how important the war in Iraq is and that it IS part of the war on terror.  How are we supposed to convince them to take out everyone else?  Things are happening according to God's will.  We are moving toward the End Times.  It's foretold.  There's no stopping it!
713310
Let's hope so.even now the right wing propaganda machine is working hard to let people forget and blame everything on the Democrats.\nAccusing the Democrats of somehow being in bed with the terrorists even.While even Bush spoke out strongly against this notion saying Democrats will defend America.\nThe United states needs to be strong and the right wing must stop labeling fellow Americans as the enemy because then the terrorist win.If Americans start to fight Americans Osama is really happy
887785
The Democratic party can not be trusted with protecting the defenseless, note they are the party that believes in taking the lives of the unborn the most defenseless of them all and they would like to see you defenseless also by taking away your ability to defend yourself with the use of any weapon. As far as the Iraqi people is concerned by all means take away anything or anybody that is defending them.
304808
The problem isn't with doing bad things to terrorists.  I don't think that anybody left or right really wants guilty terrorists to not be punished.  The problem as I see it is that it is too easily abused.  We have to accept the president's good word that he's only jailing the guilty.  Which is all fine and dandy, as long as we have an omniscient God in the whitehouse, or at least someone who has a heart of gold.  \n\nThe problem is that nobody is perfect and at least when there's an actual legal system that applies, there is some mechanism to right impropriety.  But as things stand, there isn't really and we have to depend on the system working perfectly.  \n\nThe problem with this die hard logic is that eventually a Democrat will get into the Whitehouse.  Maybe even (*gasp*) Hilary Clinton.   The question that always is on my mind to a dedicated republican is would you trust a Democratic administration with a democratic congress with said powers? It will happen eventually.
699235
It is what the Democrats have been doing an excellent job of lately, " Hiding and watching", or in the military, it's called "Hiding in the Foxhole". \n\nThey may be in for some big surprises. I am a Democrat, and I am voting republican. If the Democrats can support bush and company, why shouldn't I?\n\nDarryl S.
204148
Reublican's are just leaning on the fact that they are strong on national security issues. National Security has been carrying the Repiblican party since 9/11 and will continue to do so until the Democrats come up with some real ideas other than Bush is wrong. They keep running on this platform and they keep loosing elections.
851287
Only 1 that I know of is in favor of that... Charlie Rangel from NY.  Why would you make such a generalization about the entire Democratic party based on what ONE member thinks?  I'm a Republican myself, but I have to come to the defense of the Democrats on this one.  The vast majority of Dems don't agree with Rangel's position and won't support it.\n\nSee... this is why you need to actually pay ATTENTION to the news and think for yourself, not just parrot what someone else is saying.
898377
Democrats from the beginning have had problems with terrorism. For one thing they haven't produce a plan on terrorism. By the way there have been some rank and file Dems which have broken away from their party and have gone Republican. Why? the ranting far left and thier criticism of the President. The keep talking the talk but they haven't produce results. U see Democrats care about is power and high taxes.
420136
I wouldn't have it if they didn't want to kill us Americans, or at least those who are supposedly the moderate Muslims would come out against those who strap bombs on and kill innocent people.  But they are no where to be found.\n\nOh well, if we get a democrat as President I'm dipping all my bullets in pigs blood.
1031506
He's a democrat. Had he done something about the bombing we probably wouldn't have had 9/11 because we would already be a presence in the middle east but he was too busy with interns instead of being the leader of our country. Everyone seems to forget 9/11 wasn't the first attack and yet somehow Bush is the bad guy for finally doing something about it. (steps down from soap box)
1074312
Muslim or not, these people planned mass murder!\nWe all should be happy they got caught, their next target could have been in our own hometown,killing people we know and love.\nTerrorists use computers too. How many of the HATE BUSH,HATE AMERICA ,ANTI WAR, ANTI MILITARY, Q & A's you see on here everydayare coming from the BAD GUYS ?\nI haven't seen 1 democrate get on tv this morning and congradulate anybody for stopping this plot. But,if it had not been stopped the Dems would be raising Hell\n\nCould it be that the Dems are secretly supporting the BAD GUYS to make the administration look bad , so they can get back their power?\n\nWas Howard Dean behind 911 ????