Is there case law about winning a motion to undo a late filing of court documents?
478229
The opposing side does not have to agree for you to prevail.  A motion is a written request to the Judge that your case is assigned to, explaining your filing difficulties and stressing that you did present timely documents.  If the Judge finds your argument to be fair, he/she may rule that it is in the interest of justice to permit you to proceed.  Also, you should serve the opposing side with a copy of your motion.
1174022
Unlike due process, there is no statute of limitations on appeals.  The reason is you are not on trial here, the lawyers are.
1026555
If you provided a 30 day notice prior to serving unlawful retainer papers, then you will win. As long as you follow the order and procedure, you will win. But one slip-up will change things for the tenants favor.
959134
Yes, you can recourse to a superior court. Ask for legal advise, recoursing is not cheap.
212810
Most courts will have appeals packet for you.  Do this quickly, as some court matters have a time limit on appeals.  If you are not able to complete the forms on your own, contact your state Bar Association (lawyers), and ask for pro bono (free service) attorney to assist you.\n\nBut do understand that you can only appeal matters if there were technically errors made during the case and not just because you did not like the outcome.
266247
Sounds like the husband fraudulently hid assets from the court and from the wife.  You file a post decree CR 60 (civil rule 60) motion to vacate the final decree. CR 60 is the court rule that gives you a chance to "re-open" a case under circumstances of fraud, misconduct, newly discovered evidence, etc.  So, you file the CR 60 Motion with your affidavit outlining the "fraud" of the ex husband in hiding the valuable assets.  You ask the Judge to sign an "order to show cause" as to why the case should not be re-opened due to the husband's fraud.  You serve the order to show cause on the ex husband, which basically PUTS THE BURDEN ON HIM to appear in court and "show cause" why the final Decree SHOULD NOT be re-opened so the court can remedy the fraud he has committed!!.....You basically can get a new trial and probably get sanctions against the husband for committing a fraud on the wife and on the court!v  Good luck.  If you can show the husband intentionally hid assets in bad faith, he is going to get stung by the court!!!
633791
very weird, instead of sewing them SUE.  Don't beleive any DOT laws were broken, you may have something on abandonment, but only a lawyer will know for sure.
213394
Contact the court clerks office with your information. There's a small fee involved in processing it again.
46633
A judge can do anything calendar wise with proper notice and the following of the Rules of Court.  This all depends on your jurisdiction. I'd suggest you attempt to reschedule through the court's Clerk. If a judgment was entered despite the cancellation of a mediation or hearing, it MAY be the basis for an appeal, but once again it depends on the jurisdiction.
477232
In most States NO. (check your local laws). \n\nMost states state that the landlord can not change the locks on you for a missed payment. She has to go through the "Eviction Process" and can only take your deposit and sue you for the remainder owed. She can not lock you out, sell your belongings, or kick you to the street without going through the legal process.\n\nThe legal process usually gives you 3 months in most states. Of course I'm assuming your late rent isn't that overdue??? But she would need to issue you an Eviction notice weeks in advance of Eviction.\n\nGet legal help.
350294
yes it is possible.  You can choose to be in default of the hearing which means that since you did not show up then the decree is defaulted and if the papers have been signed by both parties that is the end of it.
159120
Absolutely. But, the law limits the amount of time you have to file your case. Different areas have different laws. I would suggest you ask an attorney.
815843
The information above won't help you much. Perhaps if you can provide something more as to why you'd file a motion with a court to stop payment, that would help someone guide you.\n\nIt sounds more as if you're looking for a court rule...
1000889
The old saying 'get it in writing' will probably apply here.  Otherwise, a judge will just view it as hearsay.\n\nSo, if it wasn't in writing, you will have a hard time proving a case about the refusal part, which will open the door to collect the past support.
1141619
An application process to some type of appeal.
862299
A case for harassment will be thrown out of court if it is based on your eviction of the tenant for nonpayment of rent. The operative word is "res judicata": she could have brought the matter up in the earlier case.\n\nAnyway, claiming and enforcing a legal right through normal channels cannot be harassment. I am assuming this is not a "statutory tenant" under a local rent control scheme. And that you did follow legal procedures.\n\nWith difficult tenants it is always best to keep a diary, listing contacts and what was said. If you have the means (perhaps by way of telephone bills) to reconstitute such a list, it will be helpful in court if the case is not dismissed on motion (you should tell the judge at the start that you want summary dismissal as the complaint states no cause of action; if the judge agrees then the case is over before it begins). Or you could counterclaim for the stolen (or "converted") property. You probably need to serve the documents for that now. You should be able to get a blank form (or a model as used in other cases) for that from the clerk of the court.
391891
Neither constitutional law nor state court eviction proceedings are my bag, but here's a suggested area to look at from what I gathered.  \n\nUSC 28.89.1443 discusses removal of civil rights issues from state court to federal court.  Technically, you aren't asking for removal.  However, it sounds like the fed courts are treating the eviction proceeding as a closed state decision and, thus, your counterclaim (ie - your filing) is precluded. I don't remember the specific statute, civ pro rule or case, but federal questions can be raised at any time.  If the violation encompasses a federal question, I'd go back and essentially say 'ok, so this is a removal request because a federal question of jurisdiction over a civil rights matter that I am claiming on exists.' There might be a case under USC 28.89.1443 to support it such a removal request.  \n\nWith no knowledge of the actual complaint, opinion, etc to examine arguments, this is about all I can think of.  Best of luck.