How well do you think king james played 2day?
463684
i think he did very well
879776
First of all, we need to know something about King Charles the 1st and what it means to be a "good" king.  \n\nI read that Charles I ruled without Parliamentary support during the "Eleven Years Tyranny."  This could be considered, "good," because the king was so strong and steadfast, but it was really tyrannical and bad for the people.  \n\nCharles I's legacy includes some positive recognition as a protector of the Church of England and is still celebrated by the "Society of King Charles the Martyr."  Because he was a "defender of the Anglican faith," he could be considered a "good," King.\n\nProbably the answers that are best could be derived from your text book, in class lectures, or assigned reading material.  He didn't seem to be a very "good" King at all...  He even lost the monarchy all together!
1161219
Beethoven or Mozart\nLinz was good, too but I don't think of him as "Famous" as the other two.\n\nOr are you talking modern times??\nLiberace or Elton John
510495
I prefer the King James Version because I believe it to be the most correct. \n\nOne of my favorite scriptures is:\n\nJames 1:5 "If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him."
1079521
One-dimensional?? Are you crazy? Do you even watch him play?? He will be THE BEST of his class!! Even better than Lebron (Which I've known since day one!)... watch and see!
1113644
I am a 58 yr. old woman, who has always thought, and maintains the thought that Michael Jackson is one of the most talented persons I've ever heard.  He is far better than Elvis Presley could ever have dreamed to be, and the only other entertainer  that I like better than Michael would be Little Richard.  ........by the way, I also like Prince.
1112754
depends on the player, the cleverness, and other various aspects. So lets hear it...it better not be about D Lee or Maddux!
851966
are you serious?king Richard was a king , bush only thinks hes one.as far as criticizing king Richard,no i wouldn't because a king can have your head chopped off.this isn't a very well thought out question.
329676
king charles the second\n\nthis link may help you
198356
Of course he should.  He could sing, move, act (well maybe not).  He was a great entertainer and had a great voice.  The man brought a lot of music into the lives of a lot of people.  While a lot of complaints are made that he watered down Black music, I think what he did was open the door to it being more widely adopted.
220024
To please James Ist of England and 4th of Scotland who had recently succeeded Elizabeth. The play includes\na. witchcraft which James hed written on in a short book.\nb. 'proof' that James was the legitimate air of Banquo in the play in the witches' pronouncememnts: the line of kings reflected in the glass represents James' ancestors.\nc. A scene showing the healing powers of being a good king. Note the allusions of sickness surrounding Macbeth with the air of goodness around Banquo and Malcolm.(English scenes, Act 4). Note also the play includes two physicians. Goodness, health and a legal King go together.\nIn the unstable situation following the huge succession doubts at the end of E1R's reign, a play demonstrating James right to rule would have been warmly welcomed.\nThe irony that James was certainly dissolute, probably homosexual and certainly not a nice person means he certainly needed all the help he could get (and no one wanted a return to the ping-pong religious faddists pre-Elizabeth.)\nThe chaos and evil Shakespeare generates in this play : unparalleled in his output, may hold up the mirror to England of what an Unstable government might mean, especially as the gunpowder plot had tried to do just this.
844193
Maybe Return of the King? lol
48293
I loved him in Real Genius and The Saint.  I think he may have put on a few pounds though.
268686
Yes! i have read it, its very much like the Kings James version.
593675
Thanks Bro.\nLike he said, all Lebron had to do was be a little patient.  VERY impressive against a good Pistons team.\n\nYESSS!!!  \nGame 6 in Cleveland tomorrow night...
407120
King John was definitely robbed, but not of his gold. He was not a popular king, but a most effective one, for he signed the document that was the basis of what is England's Parliament today, the Magna Carta. The hefty taxes levied upon the poor peasants of England were done so to pay the ransom for Richard, the Lionhearted, the absent hero of the Robin Hood saga. King Richard, on the other hand, despised England, and even after he was released from imprisonment, spent the remainder of his days in France...There is no factual basis for the stories of Robin Hood. However, Prince John did become king and ruled from April 6, 1199 until his death in 1216. He was largely unpopular due to losing coveted properties to France and for his excommunication from the Roman Catholic Church. That's why there have been very few royals since named John...The story of Robin Hood has no true merit in history. There are varying stories during that time when Anglo-Saxons and Normans still held prejudices against one another, some of them not so noble or heroic. It is widely believed that "Robin Hood" is a play on words evolving from the tales of an unsavory Robbing Hood or Thief. Despite Prince John's contributions - he is accredited with founding the Modern Royal Navy, he was considered unpopular among his contemporaries. Sad is the fact that while Robin Hood will always be fondly remembered as a wiley heroic fox, Prince John will go down in modern history as a thumb-sucking lion cub a la Disney. Hope this helped.
317456
Prince Charles was in the armed forces and is skilled in many martial arts, despite his friendly outward persona, he could kill people with his bare hands. I dont know much about prince (the singer) but I think Charles would waste him in under 3 seconds. I'd pay good money to watch that by the way.