was V for Vendenta a bad movie?
470738
V for Vendetta was an awesome movie! It was very entertaining and thought provoking. I would see it again because it was that good. Every moment of it kept me entertained. It was a very good plot and I loved the point of the movie.
1052243
I did see it and it was cute.  Like you, I don't see many movies because they are too expensive, but we took our kids to see it.  While it was 'animated' the storyline was not geared (HAHA!) toward kids.  \n\nMy suggestion...wait for the video.
788297
no i haven't seen it but i want to see it ever since it came out but never got around to it u have to tell me if it's good or not , \n\nit looks like a really good movie even if it is pg, i like pg movies so talk to ya later!
734497
Fast Food Nation was a great book, and as a piece of nonfiction, it is still one of the best pieces of long-form journalism of the decade. But Eric Schlosser and Richard Linklater's fictionalized take on the same topic isn't deserving of the original book's name.\n\nFirst, the film tries far too hard to do far too much at once. Is it a cautionary tale about eating beef? Cattle farming? Illegal immigration? Paying workers too little? Crystal meth? Optimism? Any one of these (or even two) would have been enough fodder for a 2-hour film, but tackling them all in one movie is a blunder. A very Big One. No topic is explored enough, and in the process, they all suffer.\n\nSecond, the casting is hit-or-miss. Wilmer Valderrama is surprisingly good, as are Greg Kinnear and Ashely Johnson. As expected, Catalina Sandino Moreno runs away with the film, when she's on camera, which is not very much. But Avril Lavigne is laugh-out-loud terrible, as is the comically unscary Luis Guzman.\n\nThird, the grossout factor. There are graphic and bloody scenes of animal death and dismemberment in the movie, but to what end? They're stuck in with no discussion or reflection on them, and because of this, they seem simply gratuitous, not moving or instructive. And really, that's the story of the entire film.
1060838
Don't rent it if you're bored by black and white or if you're looking for  a lot of action/romance.\n\nIf you're looking for a good movie with incredible acting, rent it.  It's worth every penny.
723702
You can't compare old films to new films.  Its like comparing old music to new music.\n\nMost people tend to say the older ones (of just about anything) are better, but its all down to personal preference.  A lot of modern films rely on dodgy CGI effects and sex, which is why the new version might have done well at the cinema, whereas the old films relied more on suspense and tension, but then the trade off is that these things are harder to achieve with cardboard sets and no colour.\n\nAgain, its all down to personal preference.  But yes, Paris Hilton did ruin what could have been a perfectly good film.
337663
I just saw it  it wasn;t too bad  BUT Jennifer did not do her best in  this movie  Clive Owen owned it.. he has more scenes in it than she does\ngive it a try  everyone is their own critic
422739
I thought it was a bad rip off of "The Lady Vanishes" except on a plane instead of a train. It even blatantly stole the fog on the window idea. It was a big disappointment.
317040
YES!!! I thought "Walk the line" was a good movie and my sister hated it with all her being.lol\n\nSame thing with that movie "Domino" i loved that movie and my parents hated it, luckly my sister liked this movie\n\nAll this shows is that i have GGGRRREEEAAAATTTT taste in movies
1185915
No, it wasn't any good at all. The original stunk pretty bad, too.
837432
its the worst movie i have ever seen. its tooo boring. don't go for it.
206931
I hear you Asif, I really enjoyed the film but was not blind to its flaws. \n\nFirstly the story is more disjointed than the graphic novel on which its based as the film had to fit a decent time. \n\nYou dont get to understand the eye, the ear, the finger and the head. You don't understand how the fire at Larkhill started, then you would appreciate the Scarlett Carson rose connection even further. You don't understand how V has access to the core of the system. \n\nSecondly, from a visual point of view the film used the same cues as the Matrix series which is almost a bit cliched now. \n\nBefore the dictatorship has normal colour, the present day is saturated with blue. The shadow gallery and Detrich's house are warmer coloured. \n\nBullet time is used in the action sequences and jars with the style of the comic which portrays violence in a much more real way. \n\nWhilst V has a very powerful message the film stayed less true to the comic than the likes of Hell Boy and Sin City. \n\nInstead of the Guy Fawkes intro if the real factors that catalysed Moore and Lloyd to write the novel were listed (the miners strike, the cold war, the palpable fear of AIDS and the homophobia that went with it, the race riots of the early 1980s) rather like the the intro to Star Wars then it would have made more sense.\n\nIt was also jarring for UK media to see the UK portrayed as being run by a pious leadership as we are secular country in comparison to the US.\n\nLastly and most importantly, Alan Moore asked for his name to be removed from the film. This communicates the wrong message to reviewers, after all Moore allowed his name to be associated with The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen film, which truly was dreadful.
1128705
Me and two friends saw it on saturday.  It was good, I liked it.  I wouldn't recommend seeing it though unless you love romantic flicks because it has nothing but romance in it.  It's a really cute film the only thing was it was hard to keep track of events and who lived in the present and who lived in the past and one key event in the story was very obvious in the beginning...I'll give it a 2.5/5 though, only see it if you like romance movies...if you don't you probably won't like it, but if you're into romance movies defaintly give it a try.
1035963
I can't think of any particular ones right now--but I have seen movies with very unhappy endings (which I expected to turn out happy).  For instance, there was one where a couple struggled to be together for years, and finally when they were--one died.  I was very upset about that.
612431
I hated it. Their were only a few funny parts in the whole movie. It had absolutley no point. People at my school are still wearing those VOTE FOR PEDRO t shirts. It was a sorry movie and a pathetic excuse for a comedy!
461462
I didn't care for it, I didn't think it was creepy at all.\nThe "shocking" scene were not so shocking and the movie lost me after the main character passed out.\n\nThe movie left too much unexplained.\n\nSorry.
307769
That movie was terrible. I expected a lot more from T.I.;\nThe storyline was weak. It should have been more action and more fights.