Question about Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire movie?
468662
The thunderstorm was a dramatic effect for the movie itself. It has nothing to do with the book itself, and the book mentions nothing about Mad-Eye Moody having any effect whatsoever on the weather. The director added this effect to create a mood.
520243
OMG! I finally finished watching all of them. I really liked the Goblet of Fire, but I think that was the 4th huh? I get them all mixed up. Then I would say 3rd one. They get better each time!
20089
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. i like it because i think that Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter) is hott.
774543
The third one was the best so far.  The director did an excellent job creating the dark and intensity of the story, and the story flowed together perfectly.  The others were too childish, Goblet of Fire was good but too rushed and crunched together.
1010189
http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hp&id=1808496768&cf=prev\n\nvery informative
1014334
I would have to say that all of them were great but the fourth one (Harry Potter & The Goblet Of Fire) really stood out for me, there was alot more action and graphic effects, but they did miss out crucial (or what I wud consider crucial lol) parts like the Quidditch World Cup, I really wanted to see the Veelas & Winky. But overall the characters have matured more and you now see a deeper side to them, plus Draco is totally hot in this one, he no longer has his hair all slicked back (even though he didn't have it that way in the 3rd one) and I like the new side of Ron that we saw in the movie, it was nice to put words to picture instead of having to try and picture it in you head for yourself. Well that's my answer and I think since I wrote so much I should get best answer! *lol*
718927
1)Congratulations Level6 player!!\n2)Harry Potter 4:Originally they wanted to make 2 movies\nthen they decided to make one with the highlights cuz the\noriginal idea was not very good (didn't make the producers happy).Anyway the director (Mike Newell) decided to\nfocus on Voldemort's character and the effect of his existence to the other \nheroes of the book.Pity though,in my opinion so far its the best book!
619018
aahhh!  tim o'brien... sorry, i dont have the answer because i never saw the movie.  i did read the book though.  tim o'brien is actually a teacher at my school (texas state university) and the chair of the english department.  he actually came to my class (close friends with my english teacher) last semester and the 17 of us got to talk to him one on one.  it was so interesting to hear all of the things he had to say about life, war, love, things that are going on now...it was also very interesting to hear that most of that book is not reliable information on what really happened to him at war.
193737
Harry Potter is 14 in the Goblet of Fire. \nActually if you are asking about Daniel Radcliffe he is currently 16 years old.  \nActual Date of Birth of Harry Potter as told by JKR is July 31, 1980.
1086019
i expect it will be good,but im a little scared that they are going to cut SO much good scenes...i mean,Dobby and Vinky didnt even show up in Harry Potter and Goblet of Fire...that is just wrong!
555632
I thought it was pretty good.  Yeah, the beginning was a bit off, but for people who have no idea of the situation in the UK at the time, it was a great way to explain the fear.  I still like the books better, fevered imaginings are usually a bit more detailed than any movie.\nIt will be interesting to see how the next movies go -- especially since there are Chronicles that are not in the same timeline.
493674
Below are movie titles\n1.Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (2001)\n2.Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002) \n3.Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004)\n4.Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005) \n5.Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007) - UNDER PRODUCTION
839305
The trailer looks good. Glad to see Gary Oldman back. Even happier to see Helena Bohnam Carter and Imelda Staunton join the gang of elite British actors camping it up for Harry Potter.\n\nJust a little concerned about how they are going to cramp all that story into a single movie. Order of The Phoenix is my favourite in the series. I was kinda disappointed at all the jarring omissions from The Goblet of Fire. The character of Rita Skeeter is the writer's satirical take on the fakeness of the media. All reduced to a side note. And how about Hagrid's half giant legacy?\n\nI know Order of The Phoenix will never be better than the book but I'm sure the film makers will at least make it entertaining.
76899
YESYESYESYES!!!\n\n\nIt has been a few years since I read the books, but I think that it was one of the most faithful book-gone-movie movies that i have ever seen.
735331
I thought I was the only one who did not enjoy The Fellowship of the Ring. What does the Ring do? Why is everyone so self righteous? I can't feel the sadness when Gandalf died because in no part of the movie show the development of their deep friendship. What's the significance of Cate Blanchett's scene other than to turn grey? So conveniently the Balrog appears after everyone was cornered by Orcs in the mines. It does not have a big satisfying ending with its budget. Frodo seemed like a weakling that has the tendency to get stabbed.\n\nSo good to get all this out of me. Thank you very much.
557361
If you enjoyed the book, you'll like the movie.  they are very similar.  I would recommend seeing it in the theater if possible.  I think all good movies are better in the theater.  But do NOT take your baby!  \n\nIf you can't get out anytime soon though, you may as well save some money and wait for the DVD. \n\nI don't think you'll be disappointed w/the movie though.  Ian McKellan is excellent as Teabing!\n\nAnd just to comment on the person above me...I think it totally depends on where you live and how many showings your theater has.  For me, some showings were sold out, but I just walked up 10 min. before the movie started and was able to get tickets for my showing.  I haven't NOT been able to get tickets for a movie I wanted to see in like 2 years...since less people go to the movies these days.
973434
The book is better than the movie and neither are outstanding.  they are ok.  It would be hard to follow the movie and really understand what is happening without reading the book.  I think both book and movie have been highly over-rated.\n\nIn terms of getting to sit and watch a movie - maybe if you have a portable DVD player and you take it into the bathroom with you and lock the door and refuse to come out until it is finished!!  When y kids were little that was the only place I could read for a few minutes!  How about hubby taking care of the kids for a couple of hours so you can watch a movie undisturbed?  Otherwise, hire a baby-sitter for a few hours so you and hubby can go to a  movie.  I sympathize!!  Best of luck!  They do grow up and before you know it the house will be quiet!!