Who do you Think are the best 3 Players ever in Tennis?
472950
Ever?\n\nBjorn Borg\nJohn Mcnroe\nAnd Boris Becker\n\nFemale:\nMartina Nafratilova\nMonica Selez\nChris evert Loyd
1186746
i totally agree.\nNadal is Hoooooooooooottttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt!\nHe may not be dominating the grass and hard courts but, he is definately the king of the clay. with a little more practice Nadal will be the King of all surfaces.\nNadal is the best!!!!!!!!!!!!!
457945
There are about five players with an excellent chance of winning the French. There are also about 20 other players that are capable of winning but are considered dark horse / longshots to win. Nadal being the favorite to WIN, Federer is between 2 and 4 on on players with the best chance.   Nadal, Nalbandian, Federer, Coria, Ferrer, Ferrero, Gasquet, Davydenko, Robredo etc. are all excellent contenders for the French Open
34942
my all time fav is boris becker cuz he was the best player i have seen in tennis , but from current players i like andre aggasi  , sharapova only cuz of her looks n sexyness n sania mirza cuz she the only known tennis player from india
666402
For men, you'd have to say Pete Sampras.  He won Wimbledon 7 times, against relatively tough competition.  For clay, I'd probably pick Borg who won the French Open six times.  Although I'd believe a modern player like Nadal would beat Borg, that has as much to do with modern equipment as anything.  For hard courts, I'll pick Ivan Lendl.  Lendl had perhaps the worst win record of anyone of his talent, but he reached the U.S. Open final from 1982-1989, which is 8 consecutive years in a row, and he won it 3 years in a row.  Had Lendl been just a little tougher mentally, he would be considered the best player ever.\n\nFor doubles, hmm, I'll go with the classic of John McEnroe and Peter Fleming, although there were many very talented doubles teams.  Its popularity has fallen due to a lack of a top singles player.\n\nFor women on grass, I'll pick Martina Navratilova. I know. She won Wimbledon 9 times, and she was a finalist 3 more times.  That's a lot of times to reach the finals.  Steffi Graf won 7 times as a baseliner, but I prefer to see a serve and volleyer on grass, especially considering how few women play this style of tennis anymore.  On clay, Chris Evert was the queen of clay, winning the French Open 7 times and reaching the finals twice more.  Women's hard courts is a close call.  Martina won the US Open on hard court 4 times, but was finalist 4 more times.  Steffi Graf won it 5 times, and was finalist 3 more times.  I'll give the edge to Graf. \n\nFor women's doubles, I'd pick Martina Navratilova and Pam Shriver.  They're the only doubles player to win the Grand Slam.  They won 109 matches in a row, a record.\n\nIf you had to pick mixed doubles, you'd have to pick Margaret Court who won a mixed Grand Slam in 1963 with Ken Fletcher, then again in 1965, with three different partners (John Newcombe, Ken Fletcher, Fred Stolle).
592315
My guess must be FED EX he's an overall player able to play in any surface to perfection, better place your bets on Roger Federer.
955762
Here the real statistics on this for the current player. 1- Nadia Petrova, has the best serve & the most number of aces. 2- Nicloe Vaidesova. \nMaresmo, Justine, Sharapova, Hantuchova, Ana, Safina & Iancovici, have about the same.\nRemember, Sharapova has improved her serve ,at the end of the year, so the idiots who say Sharapova, has no idia about tennis or his year history, but just go by beauty in giving Sharapova credit.
1172202
Federer, Agassi, Nadal, Roddick, Mayer,and Hewitt!
385188
Rafa I mean Rafael Nadal. Federee is also good but Rafa is a rockstar. Such a strong body combined with powerful shots.\nIn Gals i lov Maria Sharapova with her orgasmic shrieks.
717167
You know, every country goes through a period of rebuilding once their champion players retire or begin to wind down. It's not fair to expect to produce champions at every turn. We in Oz have never had the pleasure that others have had with multiple champions or choices of them. We have produced some great players though, some of the best, just not all at the same time. Just be grateful that no matter where the players herald from that we still get to see fantastic tennis. I know what you are saying in relation to representative tennis. Sadly a lot of players do put their personal careers ahead of country. Although I personally find that a little sad ( as none seem to mind the chance at Olympic Gold) They have the right I guess to limit their matches and games if it's the Grand Slams that they have their eyes on. We tend to have unrealistic expectations of our players. Maybe it's just that other players are finding form or new players making their mark. I'm sure they are trying. They wouldn't want their fans to be disappointed in them.
403337
For now, I would say Sampras because he did it for longer.  They both can play various styles but within that variety,  I'd say Sampras was more of a classic power player and Federer the more "artistic", touch player.\n\nWhen it's all said and done, and if Federer has a few more dominant years, I think that most people will answer your question with "Federer".  I'm definitely pulling for him to break Sampras' record for most majors won in a career.
641075
3rd greatest player ever
597739
Rod Laver. He won four grand slams in Tennis. Plus the quality of opposing players in his times was very high. They were legends in thier lifetime. A galaxy of super tennis players appeared at that time.
545513
1) Tiger Woods. It is mechancially sound, powerful and it never abandons him in the middle of a round. It's also beautiful to watch. Good enough to win the US Open twice (and everything else).\n\n2) Vijay Singh. Another mechanically sound swing that appears so effortless. Good enough to win the Masters.\n\n3) Ernie Els. Mechanically sound, powerful, and effortless. Good enough to win the US Open twice.\n\nHowever, the BEST swing of all time was that of Ben Hogan. Once he figured out his swing it never abandoned him even under the most extreme pressure of major chapionship golf. Watching his swing was like watching an artist -- it was truly beautiful and awe inspiring.
519331
Federer because he is skillful
332442
Federer,Nadal,Tipsarevic,.....
22690
I like Andre.  But Federer is the most complete player I've seen, and I've been watching tennis for 20 years.