i need to no bout the 50's,bout all the supreme court cases that happen can anybody help me?
459558
1950–1959\nMullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306 (1950): proper legal notice in the settlement of a trust \nGraver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605 (1950): patent law, doctrine of equivalents \nSweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950): segregation, separate but equal \nMcLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950): Fourteenth Amendment, segregation \nJohnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (1950): jurisdiction of U.S. civilian courts over nonresident enemy aliens; habeas corpus \nFeiner v. New York, 340 U.S. 315 (1951): Free speech v. public safety \nDean Milk Co. v. City of Madison, Wisconsin, 340 U.S. 349 (1951): Dormant Commerce Clause \nUniversal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 (1951): judicial review of agency decisions \nJoint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath, 341 U.S. 123 (1951): freedom of association \nDennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951): First Amendment and the Smith Act \nStack v. Boyle, 342 U.S. 1 (1951): defines excessive bail \nRochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165 (1952): restriction of police power \nZorach v. Clauson, 343 U.S. 306 (1952): release time programs \nYoungstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952): presidential power to seize steel mills during strike to ensure wartime production \nKawakita v. United States, 343 U.S. 717 (1952): treason accusation against a person with dual citizenship. \nToolson v. New York Yankees, 346 U.S. 356 (1952): baseball and antitrust regulation \nUnited States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953): State secrets privilege \nBeginning of active duty of Chief Justice Earl Warren, October 5, 1953 \nBrown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954): segregation, “separate inherently inequal” \nBolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954): segregation in the District of Columbia \nBerman v. Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954): eminent domain, takings \nCommissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426 (1955): definition of taxable income \nWilliamson v. Lee Optical Co., 348 U.S. 483 (1955): Due Process Clause, economic liberties \nGriffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 (1956): access to court transcript for indigent appeals \nReid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957): treaty power, right to jury trial \nRoth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957): obscenity \nTrop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 (1958): Eighth Amendment, loss of citizenship \nByrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., 356 U.S. 525 (1958): application of the Erie doctrine \nNAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449 (1958): freedom of association, privacy of membership lists \nSpeiser v. Randall, 357 U.S. 513 (1958): loyalty oaths \nCooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958): enforcement of desegregation, "massive resistance" \nLouisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of Thibodaux, 360 U.S. 25 (1959): Abstention doctrine \nSmith v. California, 361 U.S. 147 (1959):
312544
what state? is it fed. district court,us supreme court? need more info and i can get it for you.
913292
If this is for an essay and you have time for research then you use a treatise on constitutional law. There are also resources online.\n\nThe US Supreme Court rules on the federal constitution. State supreme courts (in NYS the Court of Appeals -- their supreme court is the lowest court of general jurisdiction, following English practice) rule on state constitutions. Here's an example where a state law on double jeopardy was stricter than the federal rule: http://www.uniset.ca/naty/maternity/192P2d449.htm (in federal practice, two different sovereigns can prosecute the same offense, California law (only) is different).\n\nCiting a US Supreme Court case is easy. You go to http://www.lexisone.com (free registration required) or to http://justia.us (uses Google searching rules which may be more familiar to you) and you look for what you want -- key words, etc. Supreme Court cases are cited in the pattern "Smith v. Jones, 123 U.S. 456 (19XX)".\n\nMost Supreme Court constitutional law cases are famous: Roe v. Wade (abortion), Loving v. Viriginia (miscegenation), Lawrence v. Texas (sodomy), Miranda v. Arizona (right to warnings upon arrest), Gideon v. Wainwright (right to counsel). And so on.
270992
It is true that the Supreme Court can hear any case it wants. A common type of case they take up is a case involving a legal issue in which two or more of the federal circuit courts have reached different conclusions on the same issue. The Supreme Court will take the case to settle the relieve the conflicting opinions of the circuit courts.
80588
Try FindLaw.com. It covers U.S. Constitution, U.S. Code, Code of Federal Regulation, U.S. Supremem Court decisions, and just a ton of other stuff. There is also a breakdown on state codes and regulation.
190655
you might want to try tennesseecase.net
366028
What sort of rights. I'm looking for a case to take on right now. Is there money involved?
490652
Roe v. Wade (abortion) by far is the most influential case during that time period.  Wyman v. James about 4th Amendment rights.  Parents right and Free Exercise in Wisconsin v. Yoder.  I would personally recommend Yoder as Roe is probably going to be used by a lot of other people in your class.
989031
The first link gives you the actual U.S. v. Hitchcock case.\n\nAnother link you may want in the future, if you want Supreme Court cases, is below the first.
1063516
CalLaw is a fabulous resource for California legal issues.  The link below is the search I did on the site specifically for your question.  Just keep in mind it isn't free!  However, you can use the case names as a jump-off for further internet searches.
1155598
your record gets cleaned when you turn 18, it might be  pain to get details but if you talk to the right person you might be able to dig something up because they keep records of all court cases. Good luck!!
143773
Try www.findlaw.com.  It offers online access to cases, codes and practice areas.  It even has subject FAQs that should help find the information that you want, or someone who can provide it on a professional level.
255314
You can read them here:\nhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0163_0537_ZS.html
649231
About facts on the Supreme Court,check\n\nhttp://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0875894.html\n\nhttp://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,622,00.html\n\nhttp://www.constitutionfacts.com/Supreme_ct/Supreme_ct.htm
140022
You can go to free site, FindLaw, or just try to Google "United States v. Rosado-Fernandez" and see what you get. If you have Westlaw or Lexis you can use those
375699
As a law student I have had to find cases and so forth.\nThe best thing to do is use your search engine and try different keywords and see what you come up with, you will probably come up with acutal cases........read the first couple of paragraphs of the case you pull and see if its what you're looking for...............\n"Ohio, obsenity prosecution, or prosecution Ohio case, obsenity..........move the words around...........
712789
Go online and find the state or federal website with the courts.   Click on "view case history" or "minute entries"....or words similar to these.  Each State is different.  Good Luck