Is it risky to have first child if woman is 33 years old?
472390
There are always risks, whatever your age.  But think: women are having healthy babies in their 40s these days - and even later.  Talk to your doctor.
842013
A woman get technically get pregnant at any time.  So always be careful. It scares me that people ask questions like this.
664623
I have a story that may answer your question, when I was a few weeks away from having my daughter I went to see my OBGYN and there was an older couple, the woman was in her late 60's, the husband was in his early to mid 70's, the woman looked very worried and embarrassed. I figured she was just there for some gynecological reason but I did not ask of course.She started talking and told me that she and her husband had just gotten married and that she was there because she thought she might be pregnant!!!! She had not gone through menopause and she never fathomed pregnancy at her age so of course so birth control wasn't top priority, but maybe it should have been.The answer to question is yes, she can still get pregnant provided she has never had a hysterectomy or has gone through menopause, so you go rock her boat.
152005
Surgery cures the condition.At 35 a woman can have children.
820251
It is possible to have another child if the doctor thinks it is wise.\n\nI have worked in a clinic for women.  A lot of women have fibroids usually they give you heavier periods and rarely become cancerous.  \n\nI had an ovarian cyst myself but it disappeared after my son was born.   Sometimes they do that but a lot of times they require surgery.\n\nHere are some links\n\nhttp://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/uterinefibroids.html\nhttp://www.4woman.gov/faq/ovarian_cysts.htm\n\nhttp://www.gynalternatives.com/fibroids.htm
769889
Absolutely, just like there is increased risk for older mothers in having children at older ages (Down's Syndrome risk in children increases dramatically with mother's age for example), the same thing holds true for fathers.  \n\nRemember that germ cells are created during our DEVELOPMENT, and remain in tact in our bodies until there are no more left (in females this is menopause).
434167
i think it is better to have 2 children myself but there is a big age different there. i have 6 kids myself and i love them all very much. my older sister wanted another baby after i had my 3 rd son my #5 lol and she did after 7 years of freedom and she said if she had to do it all over again she would not. its truly a big question you want to ask yourself if you are ready to lock yourself down to another baby and give up what you got. i mean its hard today with kids the rules have changes alot and your age is another thing you might want to look at to the older you get the harder it is to carry a baby my last daughter i thought i was dieing it was very hard f or me and i was only 30. my sister also had alot of trouble she was 33 with her last one. best of luck .
785039
Women have done it... but think of it this way, when your child is in high school, the woman will be turning 70.  That's very hard on a child, to lose their parents so early, plus, having low energy and being slow and elderly also have a great impact.  I think it's better to examine why a woman may want a child, a new born baby, when they are turning 50.  Is it a mid-life self-fulfilling prophecy? It always depends on the individuals, but I would venture to say it could do more harm then good to the child.
635506
It is medically possible... for a woman of 33 to go through MENOPAUSE...\n\nAs with all things that concern you... \n\nSEE YOUR DOCTOR.\n\nPlease, based on these symtons... SEE HIM/HER fast... Okay?
367295
see the doc. i have a family member that could'nt have kids until she was in her 30's or 40, somethiong like that, but anyway something about her overys, but she finnally had kids after being treat from a doc.
579251
I would definately see a doctor about this one. You are now 35 which is the older side of the spectrum for getting pregnant. Your gyno will be able to give you specific information about all this stuff and will talk you through the best solution for you.
1062470
My aunt got pregnant at 43 and 45 with my cousins. As long as you are healthy and aware of the risks involved, I see nothing wrong with it! Why not? 40s women typically are going to be better prepared for a child than a 20something. Your career is established, your home is established and you've outgrown the need to be out partying every weekend! Of course thats an overgeneralization, but I've found it to be true. Not to mention 40s are more laid back than 20s. Im half way there and can see myself as a far better mother than I would have been 10 years ago and can only imagine it would improve in another 10 and I pretty much thought I was the $h1t 10 years ago!! LOL\n\nI say go for it!
132927
A female, age 53,could outlive her  63 yr. old husband by 12 years.  This of course  doesn't take into account any pre-existing medical conditions.\nRN
1049225
Women over 35 MAY have more difficulty conceiving and bearing a child.\n\nTwo reasons for this:\n\n1) A woman has as many eggs are she will ever have at birth. As she ages, her eggs do too, and their quality does decline with age. This means a higher risk of miscarriage, certain birth defects (like Down's syndrome), and also, if the egg released at ovulation  is of poor quality, a lower likihood it will implant and grow if it is fertilized (making it harder to get pregnant).\n\n2) As women approach menopause, they may ovulate less frequently, meaning fewer chances per year of getting pregnant. Also, changes in the hormonal workings of their reproductive organs could result in a lower quality egg, as the egg must be "ripened" and matured in the ovary before being released each menstural cycle.\n\nAll said, fertility is a very individual thing. Age may decrease the ease or liklihood of a woman getting pregnant, but it depends a lot upon the individual woman (and man) involved.
385835
I think the problem is the health of the baby - the risks are higher for women over 35 to have a child with downs syndrome, or some other defect. A lot of women nowadays though, are choosing to wait until they are older - they may have tests to determine your risks.\n\nGo to www.webmd.com and talk to your GYNO about it!
267098
There is no risk at all for your children...I am B- and my husband is B+ as well.  We are pregnant with our third baby, and everything is fine.\nNowadays they have a shot called Rhogam that they give women at around 23 weeks of pregnancy and then again after birth if the baby is RH+.  The shot falls under ALL insurances and is no big deal at all. They give it to you in the doctors office just like a flu shot.\n\nIn the olden days they didn't have this shot and women did have problems with subsequent pregnancies.  But that problem no longer exists for women who have prenatal care.\n\nReally, the Rh factor is no big deal.  Don't worry about it.\n\nGood luck to you!
531533
I  Hope u mean Human being "female" and not animals - Well in that case heres soemthing i have from the internet for you ..... the source is given below\n\n\nELEVEN or 66? No one in their right mind would say either is the ideal age to have a baby. \nThe average first-time mum in the UK is 29 — the perfect age to have a baby, according to consultant gynaecologist Peter Bowen-Simpkins.\n\nHe says: “You are as fertile as when you are 20, but at 29 you have the added bonus of being more financially and emotionally stable.”