What is your definition of a "government sanctioned child abuse center"?  There is only 1 correct answer.
471332
Were you thinking of School,try indonesia,if you can type you can sew shoes.Coal mines of britian 6 year olds were put to work in places too small for adults.All you have to do is learn and make poo,get over yourself.
667019
its illegal period regardless if a parent permits to it. It is even illegal for a parent to hit u, its called child abuse and the standards have evolves, Social Workers would go into a frenzy if they saw the slightest bruise on a child, or if a child told them that their parents hit on them.\n\nIt was once acceptable to beat your children as it was seen as discipline and teachers especially nuns and priest in catholic schools used to whack the BEJESUS out of children with rulers. That would be, id say 15+ years ago.\n\nNowadays, thats a teacher up for the grounds of dismissal, a criminal case of battery, and a civil case for pain and suffering, the humiliation, and punitive damages.
299694
Assuming your are an American, what government sanctioned child abuse center, aka public school, did you attend?\n\nIran has pledged to wipe Israel off the map and drive them into the sea.  Is this what you call a "kind and good people"?
915837
Go to your state's web site and type in child abuse. You should find something there.
668283
Contact the state attorney generals office. I witnessed a CSP of minor and I'm a Federal Agent...if it would not of been for my testimony the offender could of easily walked. You owe it to the children to do everything in your power to lock that SOB up!!
676430
my guess would be the United States Government (USG)\n\nevery person or entity is responsable for it's own actions, whether they be good or bad.
381602
Frankly, I've never heard that term and I've worked in both education and law enforcement.\n\nMy guess would be that somebody made that up to get across the idea that the kid's truancy and delinquency reach sociopathic levels.
464530
======\n\nedrcc is right and detailed on the subject.\n\nhe has also referred a site.\n\nPeople should answer like this.
691880
Well lilibuggs02, It does seem like navymilitarybrat76 and skorpkah420 speak with some authority and may have some experience in this issue. \n\nI mean after all, consider this, we are in a f*cked up war because of weapons of mass destruction that don't exist and never existed in the first place all because of false allegations. There seems to be a trend of taking actions now and asking question later. \n\nI would be worried, cause as you know, everyone tells the truth, for example, take george p***y, I mean bush. Anyone can MAKE SHIT UP, but it takes a certain mentality, such as the mentality  being demonstrated here by navymilitarybrat76 and skorpkah420 to accomplish such a feat. \n\nUnfortunately, so many false claims result in removal of children from their family homes everyday it unfathomable. Our current president is a prime example of this, (people who make shit up and ask questions later, after the damage is done).  When children are taken away as a result of false allegations, the parents sometimes eventually get them back, but by the time that happens, the kids most like will have suffered severe damage. The cost of which, both financially and mentally, is mind boggling. \n\nI have acquired tons of articles of kids being taken from their family homes and placed into foster homes, only to be used as literal slaves and sex slave at all ages.  What's really disturbing is that kids are taken away without merit and before there has been any investigation whatsoever, in fact that is the way it's done. \n\nIt's usually occurs as the result of someone(s) like navymilitarybrat76 and skorpkah420, under the pretense that they know what's in "the best interest of the children". Now after that happens, the person(s) that have made the false allegation(s) can be held accountable for damages, if it's ever found out who that person(s) is.  However, since the system is based upon anonymity it's difficult to find out who made the false allegations in the first place.  This happens more frequently than not.  \n\nskorpkah420 and navymilitarybrat76 seem like the types of people who would make such false allegation(s) without even considering the weapons of mass destruction they have just used to destroy a kids life forever.  These do-gooders are the most ignorant people of all.  They leave wakes in their path that impales a kid and a family's life forever and justify it.  \n\nIt's similar (although, much worse)to a person who has really really bad gas and farts without the consideration of those around him/her, and them wonders why no one wants to be around them.  Ignorance is bliss but costly.  (Sorry for the seriousness with which I answered your question.)  I have unfortunately had some experience in this area.  It's what has lead me into the field of law. It is the very reason I have become an advocate.  Thanks Mimi for directing me to this question.  I love you all, Bling On
98236
Your answer is here. Children have rights and how this works is posted on this site.
521196
I know of some rehabilitated former sex offenders that are single parents. Do you think their children would agree with you? Their children that love them. Their children that are taken great care of by them. I bet if they could get on here and answer this question, you would really be enlightened. I know of one little girl that got Six Flags to take the wording "sex offenders" off the tickets. She is being raised by her single parent who is registered.
824986
So are children victims..of their parents??\nResident's victims of state laws?\nStudent's victims of their university?\nEmployees  victim's of their employer?\nThe public victim's of the news media/print business conglomerate's \n...Specify WHAT type of authority you mean..
717945
Against the people who abused said child, yes.  But I wouldn't get my hopes up about going up against any state run agencies.
805075
Its a trick question, right? everyone knows that there is no such thing as an honest Government official.  HA good one. almost had there for a minute.
1047316
The public has a right to be protected from idiocy in their community. Much like the traffic law that helps protect you by requiring vehicles stop at red traffic lights instead of driving through them and t-boning you and ripping the bones out from under your skin, children too need protection from the foolish and inconsiderate.
84703
Definition by US Gov't.:  "Premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience."\n\nThis word is used a lot lately in very imprecise ways.  For example, Iraqis who blow up US troops are not terrorists, because the troops are not noncombatants.  To call any government or any person working for any government "terrorist" is a contradiction in terms.  This doesn't mean that they may not be behaving in inappropriate ways, just that people should find something else to call them.\n\nFor example, if it is discovered that the men who carried out the Trade Center attacks were actually working for the government of, say, Iran, (and I am not implying that they were) then they would no longer be called "terrorists."  They would be "enemy combatants."  This is a distinction which is particulary relevant in the current political climate.
231533
Yes, I think the government intrudes on our personal life way too much.  A parent could be arrested for spanking their child.  The Dept. of Human Services has become a threat to every parent.  Your kids can be taken away a lot easier these days.  My neighbor will lose her kids if she misses too many counseling appointments that were set up by DHS.  It's getting ridiculous.....