does anyone know new jersey case law that has held state shall not enter contract with minor??
471681
federal trumps state. under federal statute it is not binding to enter into a contract with a minor.
410517
It depends on the location.  Talk to a lawyer.
902230
The "contract" you are referring to is actually more of an agreement. If it's anything like what I've seen at my kid's schools, it outlines what your responsibilities and obligations are in that classroom. This is not the same thing as a legally binding contract. In other words, your teacher cannot sue you in a court of law if you don't do your homework. \n\nPersonally, I don't think kids should sign anything unless their parents know about it and approve of it first. It isn't that the "contract" in question is unreasonable, just that as a parent, I think I should know what a teacher's expectations are of my children, in order that we can ALL be in agreement. The "contracts" I have seen at my kid's schools have always had a place for the parent to sign, as well. I don't think a teacher would object if a student said that they didn't feel comfortable signing anything without their parent seeing it first.
930580
The cashier isn't required to keep it in that situation, but he can't accept payment on it, as it's obvious that the child isn't the cardholder.  But if he accepts the purchase and the kid knows the PIN, the parent isn't going to be able to dispute the transaction (disclosing PIN waives the right to dispute).  So he loses nothing by doing so.\n\nThere is a rule in law that children don't have capacity to contract: this means that they can't understand the nature of a binding agreement, and it is unfair to place such obligations on them.  I don't know how often it comes up in practice though.
394762
Ok, I don't need to edit, I need to totally change the answer, lol.  I thought that you borrowed money from your mom or something like that.\n\nIn the case of the apartment lease, it also depends on where you live.  In some cases, 17 year olds can be held to the terms of the contract, especially if you had an adult sign with you.  Your best bet would be to see a lawyer about it.
48430
Yes, if they can find a landlord who will rent to them.  Most won't because the lease won't be binding.  The lease is invalid if signed by a minor.  Which means that the minor can't be held liable for anything (unpaid rent, damages, etc...)
442311
I believe it depends on what is written in your contract.  I recommend asking a professional (i.e. attorney).
87374
In most cases involving minor's counsel, this is an attorney appointed by the Court to represent the child's interests and paid for by the parents.  Unless there is a hotly contested custody hearing, the court usually won't appoint one.  Of course, the exact laws and policies on will vary vary by state.\n\nIf your son wants to come live with you, talk it over with your ex.  You might be able to work something out.  If your ex won't agree, you will need to file a motion for a change of custody and prove to the court that it is in the child's best interest to live with you now.
54231
A minor can start a business however a minor cannot sign a contract unless a parent or guardian cosigns the contract for you.
559494
"The case of Fare v. Michael C. the U.S. Supreme Court held that whether a juvenile's waiver of rights was voluntary and knowing depends on the totality of circumstances"\n\nYou can find information about FARE V. MICHAEL C. in the links below.
138961
Hi tiff_ige,\nI've lived in several states and have never ran across that law. Good Luck: Blueladybug
181721
You may haev to look up your local jurisdictions laws on that one. I'm not sure about NJ's over state laws and recalling officals and who has the power over that. But I'm certian its in your local constitution and laws.
134106
Apparently it was never actually filed.  \n\nThere was some issue with the organization that claimed to have filed it.  Details here: http://www.wnho.net/njl_facts.htm
908644
Of course. The sons formed a contract with the hospital - there's no requirement that a contract provide services directly to one of the parties to the agreement.\n\nThat the contract was verbal (if it was) does not alter the situation, unless the state in which this took place has a very unusual Statute of Frauds.
574484
Well, I don't want to be the only different voice, but since you are a minor, your father should normally be allowed to "sign" for you, as your legal guardian. Since as someone under 18 you are not allowed to sign into a binding contract
4074
Minor in Possession...the consequences differ from state to state.
612043
As long as the contract is legal and binding (for example, the parties involved were of legal age to enter into a contract), then yes, the transaction is done and either party can be sued for non-performance or breach of contract if needed. \n\nThe above is of my opinion based on my experience and knowledge as a California real estate mortgage broker and investor. I suggest you seek legal advice from a lawyer who specializes in real estate law.\n\nRegards...