Do you think there should be the Arnold Law?
466349
ABSOLUTLY NOT.  One's loyalty to the USA should never be weighed against the native nation of the president.  Last thing we need is either a manchurian candidate, or a president who is second guessed because of their nationality.
1067102
I believe that any one should be held responsible for any injury they cause\n\nBut no law like that would ever pass\n\nThe Congress right now passes laws and then makes those same laws not apply to them\nHow would you ever get that past them ???
317517
In one sense you bring up an interesting point.  Let me challenge you with a broader concept...\n\n...do our Laws reflect our Morality....or does Morality stem from the Laws we make each other abide by?\n\nIn their written series of civilization, Will and Ariel Durant made the point in the first book, "Our Oriental Heritage", that man did not need or make laws until he thought his neighbor needed them.\n\nThink on that a bit as you ponder your own question.\n\nIn my own personal opinion, I do believe that faith can and should inform public policy.  In a republic such as ours, we have agreed to abide by the majority, until a new majority comes into being.  And each new majority will bring its' own set of values.
582025
more like how many laws!!!!!!!!!!!
961254
No because when they do they become scientific LAWS\n\ne.g. the Law of Gravity
1050840
No. The changes aren't good, they lead to confusions. We shouldn't change the established rules even if they are from the early days of physics. Tradition and quality,  they go hand in hand.  Maybe if a extraterrestrial civilization will conquer the Earth, they will be electrocuted by our machines, or at least they couldn't use them. This is a good policy to protect ourselves from intruders.
495822
I agree. They should have to do some kind of work to get the dole. It just makes sense.
752766
I haven't followed this political case, but I believe that any law named after a person is questionable since those pusing it will often be reacting based on emotion and grief, rather than reason.\n\nAny good law will have safeguards, and rational provisions so that whatever action is made illegal is really the action that is the threat. I generally oppose laws that make actions illegal just because they might, in combination with other actions, have the potential to cause harm. I believe in punishing those who cause the harm, and not limiting action based purely on speculation.\n\nThat being said, the voting process has become an emotional one. People -- whether voters or legislators -- pass laws based on their gut reactions, often without any concern for the consequences or long term effects. Logic and reason have largely been abandoned in favor of making headlines.\n\nAnd sadly, that's not likely to change any time soon. Good luck.
29919
Arnold Schwarzenegger
635890
Nice idea, but that is totally out of the question. Remember that Hollywood is in California...imagine the tax return the IRS gets on those millionaires hollywoodian salaries...major bucks!! Not to mention that 90% of all the produce in the US comes from California! \n\nWhat we should build is a virtual wall, with heat sensors, and automatic lazer guns. It would shoot any warm body crossing the border..bunnies, as well as illegals...illegals be ware you're getting zapped!
791561
uhhh...do they have that law?
858548
No, the law is the law, it was made by people. If you need the law to be something different then make your case and get people to vote for it. If you can't then the law is probably right as it stands.\n\nIf you abandon the rule of law then you are heading for dictatorship.
178041
I believe that there should be a law and a test to procreate.  We have to pass a test to drive, to PAY for an education and sometimes to hold a job;but any jack@#$ can have responsibility of and reproduce a child.
167920
I don't believe so.  I believe that standards and laws are what make much of our crime today.  When aomeone is constantly told not to do something then that makes them want to do it even more.  You know what I mean?  Even so, more rules means more people and forces to enforce these rules, and I don't know about where you live but Detroit had layed off much of their police officers and Detroit is known for being full of crime.  The more police there are the worse things seem to get!!!  Just my experience.
305614
no, keeping the laws that are already there and IN FORCING them is the answer.... we have laws that has to be obeyed and learned... we also have a language that should be the national language of America !!! English.......
1180966
I can't imagine that any state legislature would create that type of law, but then again, their are some pretty strange laws out there.  I would guess that the answer is no.
943236
perhaps. live and let live should be the standard. somehow people forget all about it though.