Where are the Weapons of Mass Destruction?
469964
The Weapons of Mass Constuction are the Dewalt line of tools and you can buy them at any Home Depot.
438236
M1 rifle, M1 carbine, Tommy guns (for the lucky), tanks, bombs, missiles, torpedos, people, hand grenades, stick grenades, Atom bomb, Big Bertha (huge cannon), etc...
35208
The Us has the largest stockpile of active nuclear material thus it is still the most dangerous nation there is, liable to use their nuclear arsenal if they deem it is rightious enough for their cause such as they had contemplated during the attack on Iraq. As for the world many countried now own nuclear arsenal such as France, Isreal, China, Russia, India, Pakistan and other countried deem to be developing nuclear capabilities such as North Korea and Iran.
1181821
Go to the White House on the net and get Bush's speech which, after 2 years, admitted there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The UN told Bush that before the invasion but  he ignored them!\n\nIf you need other sources let me know.\n\nNo doubt on weapons as search ends\nBy Dafna Linzer\nWashington\nJanuary 15, 2005\n\nPage Tools\nEmail to a friend Printer format   \nPresident George Bush at a media briefing this week.\nPhoto: AP\nRelated\nBiological agents \nThe White House ends the hunt for weapons of mass destruction, the main justification for the Iraq war.\n\nThe hunt for biological, chemical and nuclear weapons in Iraq has come to an end nearly two years after President George Bush ordered US troops to disarm Saddam Hussein.\n\nThe top CIA weapons hunter is home, and analysts are back at Langley, Virginia.\n\nOfficials who served with the Iraq Survey Group said the violence in Iraq, coupled with a lack of new information, led them to fold up the effort just before Christmas.\n\nFour months after Charles Duelfer, who led the weapons hunt in 2004, submitted an interim report to the US Congress that contradicted nearly every prewar assertion about Iraq made by top Bush Administration officials, a senior intelligence official said the findings will stand as the survey group's final conclusions and will be published this northern spring\n\n--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nBush's no-apologies speech convinces few \nCHILL AT U.N.: President defends Iraq policy to polite but firm criticism\nRobert Collier, Chronicle Staff Writer\n\nWednesday, September 24, 2003\n\n \nPresident Bush strongly defended the U.S. invasion of Iraq before the United Nations Tuesday, getting a polite but steely response as world leaders warned that his go-it-alone policies could undermine the international organization. \n\nThe president came to the U.N. General Assembly in New York hoping to secure greater international support for the U.S.-led occupation as well as commitments of troops and financial aid. Based on the reaction to his speech, including open criticism from U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan and French President Jacques Chirac, he got few if any takers. \n\nSeeking to set aside past differences over America's decision to go to war without U.N. authorization, Bush told the assembled delegates that "the nation of Iraq needs and deserves our aid. And all nations of goodwill should step forward and provide that support." \n\nBut Chirac, addressing the assembly after Bush had spoken, strongly criticized the president's decision to wage war unilaterally, calling it "one of the gravest trials" in U.N. history and saying it "undermined the multilateral system."
588541
weapons, oil and construction
624254
At least New York exists.  The only WMDs in Iraq are the ones the US military uses.
797345
Yes.\n\nI also believed there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
992381
Iraq's arsenal of weapons of mass destruction was not captured by US forces who heroically brought down Saddam Hussein's regime three years ago this week. It vanished before they arrived.\nIsraeli intelligence reported before the US-led invasion that starting in late summer 2002 Saddam's WMD arsenal was shipped by truck convoy to Syria. Recently, documents seized from Iraq after the fall of the regime were released to the public. Those documents revealed that under the direct command of former Russian prime minister and KGB boss Yevgeny Primakov, Russian Spetnaz forces oversaw the transfer of Iraq's WMD to Syria ahead of the US-led invasion. These reports have been corroborated by Saddam's Air Vice Marshall General Georges Sada.\n\nSo rather than being destroyed or secured, Saddam's WMD arsenal was simply moved from one rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations to another rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations.\n\nOf course, American Media will NOT report this, it will prove Bush right, and then they would look stupid.\n\nMichael Moore, thanks:\nFriday, 23 June 2006 \nWhen News Lies \n\n\nWHEN NEWS LIES\nMedia Complicity and The Iraq War\n\n\nBy Danny Schechter, The News Dissector\n\n\n\nA new book from Danny Schechter offers an up to date indictment of the role media played in promoting and misreporting the war on Iraq. It is an analysis of how and why the media got it wrong that pinpoints the failures of journalism and the collusion of media companies with the Bush Administration. The author of EMBEDDED: Weapons of Mass Deception (Prometheus 2003), an account of the TV coverage of the US invasion, returns with a more comprehensive, updated and insider look at the media complicity that Schechter argues "made the war possible."\n\n\n\n"Most of the anti-war movement focused on the crimes of the Bush Administration ignoring the mainstream media, its far more effective accomplice," says former network producer Danny Schechter (ABC, CNN). "The government orchestrated the war while the media marketed it. You couldn't have one without the other."\n\n\n\nWHEN NEWS LIES includes the feature -length DVD of the prize-winning film WMD (Weapons of Mass Deception). The book will also include the complete script as well as a discussion of the challenges of exposing media with media with a documentary. It chronicles the media war fought alongside the military campaign and the struggle to stand up for truth.
1141848
The weapons found predated the Kuwait invasion and there is nothing found that post dated it! These weapons were there for over 13 years! How can that possibly be used to prove anything?\n\nPlease ask George Bush to identify, locate and present a breakdown of all current weapons, weapons technology and the location and amount of those which are no longer used but are stored in the US and any other country where our military is found!\n\nThe idiocy of all this is that Reagan took Saddam off the terrorist list in the 1980's in order for him to purchase weapons and arranged loans for him to do that. Because some of the weapons may not have come from the US, the money to buy them did, and Reagan's removal of Saddam from the list allowed him to buy them,\n\nCheney and Halliburton were deeply involved with Iraq!
130684
This war is a personal war between Bush and Sadaam.we had no buisness ever going over there.Where is the WMD's?
767983
Health, and weapons.  Have you looked at Wikipedia.com?
1012590
Email anyone in the U.S about how you can help find weapons of mass destruction.  NSA will monitor it, and send Condi over to visit.  Put on the tunes, something soft and romantic, and cook a nice (affordable) meal.  Answer the door naked.\n\nGet'er, tiger!
280483
What, knife, gun, atomic bomb? Please be more specific.
561147
Has to be wikipedia.org\n\nBut if can focus more on the delivery systems. For example, Pershing (land-based) and Trident (submarine-based).\n\nAlso read about chemical and biological agents as bombs, and the hydrogen bomb. Read about both nuclear fusion and fission too. Not forgetting about dirty nukes.
1134141
I feel they have every right to self defense just as any other country in the world.  Remember, the US isn't one to police the world in terms of nukes.  The US is the only country that has ever used it as a weapon in war time. No other country has.  The US is just another landmass on the map.  If one country can have mass killing weapons, then everyone else has the right to defend themselves as well.
1015722
WMDs haven't been. The useless remains of WMDs have been found. What has been found amounts to nothing more than toxic waste which is easily found in Iraq; and in the United States for that matter.
35374
I believe a weapon of mass destruction is one that can yeild wide-spread devastation in a single blow.  You're right, 'conventional' weapons can produce simular effects, but only when several are deployed at once.  Further, a weapon of mass destruction tends to take advantage of scientific advancements which originated fairly recently in human history, such as nuclear fission, fusion, bioengineering and so on.  A single modern nuclear warhead can not only lay waste to an entire metropolian area, but can irradiate the soil and lierally spread radiation across the entire surface of the Earth; lierally 'mass' destruction.