is there a relationship between the color of money and the coutries economy?
462930
Only to the extent that having more colors in money makes it more difficult to counterfeit. So, if there is a huge amount of counterfeiting going on, then that country will experience high inflation and loss of buying power. If they then switch to colored money (as we did) then the counterfeit bills can be removed from circulation and the money supply will go back down to where it should be.
1386
It mainly develops naturally. The flow of money is the building block of an economy, and people will keep money flowing fairly well on their own as long as there is a basic infrastructure, such as a set market place and day/time. The highly complex economy we have today is mainly the result of these natural developments. Governmental interference can only make a limited amount of difference.
535520
Why does this question keep coming up?\n\nCurrencies have different values because economies have different sizes. The U.S. economy is millions of times the size of that say of Namibia. So the U.S. dollar, backed by prosperity of an industrialized super power has much more value then the currency of a small, impoverished nation with few resources, no industry and little if any fiscal policy.\n\nThe actual value of each currency against others is set my market forces. Supply and demand. Who wants to buy more of what. But the actual buying power of a currency has to do with its stability, the financial strength of the nation that issues it and its worldwide demand.
109388
The creation of wealth comes from adding value to something that already exists.  If you mine a metal, you add to its value by making it more accessible.  If you paint a picture, you add to the value of the paint and the canvas by combining them in a particular way.  If your organize data into a data bank, it's just like gold:  you have made it more accessible.
792365
The state of the economy.
1012956
Studies have shown that the rich are growing progressively wealthier, with the richest 1% of the American people commanding upwards of 30% of the total personal wealth.  The middle class tends to be largely addicted to spending, with a small amount being directed towards appreciating assets - ie. they invest at a mucher lower rate than the wealthy.\n\nSo, in short.  The answer to your question is yes.
1183253
False.\n\nCapitalists built the world and made it what it is. Yes,a minority\nof people have most of the wealth but there have always been rich and poor long before capitalism came along.\n As for long term prosperity for the majority-yes. That's what\nthe increase in the standard of living is all about.
141347
Green!! It is the color of money, grass, leaves and all things good.
545282
Not much difference here today.  What they did not spend today they either spent yesterday or will spend tomorrow.  So as you see it will not have an effect on our economy.  Whether you buy it today or tomorrow you still have to have what you need to live, so you will buy it .
1187022
Yes.  The euro has inexplicably grown stronger with the last addition of nations even though all of the economic indicators have fallen.  France has record unemployment, the rest of western europe isn't too far behind and the attraction for businesses to put new plants in eastern europe where wages and cost of living are dramatically lower will not improve the situation.\n\nBritain still uses its own currency because they don't have faith in the fake economy established by the EU.
757797
One is a country and the other is an economy?
636494
It's not going to be that different from a traditional economy.  They have a community and traders like most countries.  It's just a smaller realm of goods.  There's a study here: http://www.cba.uc.edu/econed/LatestAmishBrochure.pdf
344225
Yes this is true. We could have billions of money and still want more. People always want, want, want . They never think of the third world and be grateful for what you have even if it mightn't be alot compared to what others have
473482
Similarities\n1. Prices will be high.\n2. Money Floatation will be high\n\nDifferences\n\n1. In Growth, production level and quality of goods also will increase, but in inflation production level and quality of goods remain the same but price will increase..\n\n2. Standard of living will increase in growth, it will be low at inflation periods..
21298
This is a tricky question. Economics is a broad topic, and this is a narrow application. One interesting observation that I've heard is that slavery is non-existent in post-agrarian societies! Once a culture starts to move toward an industrial age, slavery simply melts away. The assertion is that capitalism is incompatible with slavery.\n\nKen Wilber has related this to developmental stages in human cultures. It is dangerous to assume a cause and effect relationship here. It might just be that once a culture has matured enough to have a robust decentralized economic system like modern capitalism, the culture likewise matures sufficiently to find reprehensible the levels of coercion that slavery requires.
269873
After 400 years of slavery should blacks be ahead of whites economically no in fact hell no why?? Because climbing the economic latter is like a race those who starts first have the ultimate advantage so its like this whites started runninng the economic race 400 whole years before blacks even thought of any type of wealth infact whites used blacks to get where they are today 400 yrs of payfree labor (free money in white peoples pockets) gav them anothere boost many whites have what youde call old money, money passed down from generations, which was generated by slavery, then theres fertile land, nourished by blacks. No real apologies made, no reparations, racism still exists although the majority of racist have no reaal reason to be angry (whites ancestors didnt suffer in America). Good thing is no no Great thing is no naa Astonishing thing is, is that Blacks havnt lost faith theyre still running the race and are catching up, through the many years of suffering if blacks didnt learn to do anything else they learned to surive and fight, so while blacks are running the race today theyre still fighting and surviving. Blacks are way far ahead of whites as far as the total outlook on life simply because theyve struggled for so long and lived without that theyve learned to appreciate the more simpler aspects of life therefore broadening the view. When you start off poor there is soo much more to look foward to but when you begin rich you loose the ability to indulge on the simpler  plesures. The African American race has sooo much to proud of and I think that they should embrace theyre past to prevail in the future, Black generations have come farther than many other races and they werent carried with money like many others. I say give blacks another 10 yrs and they would have caught up creating a tie unvailing equality for all Blacks in America shrinking racism to a diminutive peice of crap.
1122510
I am agreed with the answer of SR to somehow.\nThere are four factors of economy i.e.\n1.   Land\n2.   Labour\n3.   Capital\n4.   Organisation.\nevery factor is earning on its usage\nRent for land,\nwages for labour,\ninterest for capital, \nand profit for organisation.\n\nAs capital plays a vital role in any enterprise or u can say that in economy so it has a great importance in it.\nThe rate of interest is so determined to maintain the level of capital in order, in enterprise or in economy (when we are speaking generally).\nThen comes the concept of inflation and deflation in economy, i think there is no more need to clear these concepts.\nSimply interest rate is a tool to control the inflation and deflation in economy.