Fastskin II -- worth it??
458755
not necessarily...depending on your current times, unless you need to drop a couple of hundreths you will fare just as well with a faskskin 1 (which can be found for a lot less).  alexander popov still swims in just a brief.\n\nthe technology of the fastskin 2 is the best available, don't get me wrong, but it is more so just a marketing scheme to get you to spend more on thier product than anything.  you will in all likelyhood be just as fast in a fastskin 1, or even good tyr/nike suit of similiar quality.\n\nyour training is what will get you results...a brand new competition suit is just the sprinkles on the icing on the cake.
736768
Well, I disagree. I think you should buy it. But don't expect miracles! It may work at the minimum resolution (a bigger resolution than 320x240 will cause the application to drop too many frames).\n\nCheers!
263260
Yes, I'd higly Recommend you with Norton 2006. They have made the software Faster than ever with even more security. And most of what i like is that it an intellegente software. Intellegent in the sence, it automtically detects what are good programms and what are bad.
1162999
tune up 2006 utilities have a 30 day trial that works ok. Really you would find your time better spent in removing any and all spyware and then optimizing your startup files to remove the junk not used. Auto updaters and the like grab a lot of resourses for little return. Another big hog of resourses is the so called security suites and their bloated security centers. Better to use individual programs that  are streamlined and serve the same uses.
30974
Fastweb is pretty good.
1015773
Absolutely.  In fact, do it AS WELL AS your own online store.  As far as software goes, Adobe's got some great products.  Their vector-based product will probably be what you want (Illustrator).  There are other vector-based packages out there that are less expensive.\n\nWhen you get some ideas, send me something, and I'll buy some t-shirts from you.  I really dig some retro t-shirts with the off-color sleeve trim these days.  Kind of making my statement, I guess.
857512
i wud get the acuview 2 weeks for cost reasons. they are cheaper on a per day basis. besdies that contacts are great, cant even tell they in ur eyes
79057
i would ask local shapers, they are usually your best resource for little known shapers and would estimate the value for you. Then your not as likely to get ripped off, or part with a potentially $$pricey item for a lesser price.(assuming it is "the real mccoy). sorry, couldn't resist!
835358
I tried it for a week on a cruise..and well no acne product actually works. those ppl on t.v..duh they're wearing makeup. i mean its a better price than for proactive,  but for me it didn't really work. I use Murad, and to be honest, I've learned not to rely on acne products, because that itself can't get rid of acne. you have to eat right, drink lotsa water, etc,etc.But my skin's really oily, and i live in a hot climate, and the cruise was in a hot climate too, so that may have also added to Acne  Free not working for me. You know, if you're broke, and only have like $2, you could go to your dollar store and get a 7-day trial pack for a dollar(not including tax). that way, you can see for yourself, and if it works for you. THEN, you can decide whether or not to spend the full $20.00 (full price), instead of buying it, not having it work for you, and spending all  that moolah for nothing. have a happy thanksgiving!
330298
Why not just toss it or store it and go get some CD-R's. A 50 pack on sale cost $9, that's .18 a piece vs. spending time erasing and recording on slower CDRW's. Even at min. wage your time needed to erase and burn at slower CDRW speeds sould be a couple of bucks so give your time value and you can see it's not worth it to use them.
486789
this question is based on the wrong idea, comfort is not the deciding factor here.. its speed and muscle compression\n\nFast Skins are designed for less drag and increased muscle performance by compression\n\nSpeedos are just the old way of thinking that less material is faster\n\nand long trunks I'm assuming you mean board shorts, should not be used unless you're not worrying about speed\n\n\nso in pure comfort, boardshorts are less constrictive followed by speedos and then fast skins.. but opposite when looking for speed
756616
I've got one, and i wish i never had!!\nDispose of it, give to charity i could never get it running 100%.\nBelieve-me i tried. It was not a wise buy i can tell you.\nPrice for lexmark are very invitating but the hardware-software are a waste of money. I still have it for the sake of scanning but every time i turn it on i hide all baseball bats, hammers, bricks, etc i can see about. After no heavy objects are in sight, then i turn it on (when it does of-course). I've seen smoke, I've heard noises, I've felt electricity comming out of it. Next time it gives any sigh of life....i will stamp on it!!!\nSorry i couldn't help, but thanks i feel much better now!
96387
Scanning gray scale by hand - Logitech ScanMan 256 handheld scanner - evaluation\nHome Office Computing,  June, 1991  by Steven C.M. Chen\n\n Save a personal copy of this article and quickly find it again with Furl.net. It's free! Save it.\nAT A GLANCE: Easy to use handheld scanner capable of capturing 256 levels of gray.\n\nDOCUMENTATION: Very good; explains all features and functions.\n\nSETUP: Straightforward, simple.\n\nVALUE: Excellent.\n\nSUPPORT: About average; prepare for a lot of busy signlas. Available via phone or bulleting board; both are toll calls.\n\nLIST PRICE: $499\n\nSTREET PRICE RANGES: $300-$350\n\nLogitech ScanMan 256 - scanning device - Hardware Review - Evaluation\nHome Office Computing,  Feb, 1992  by Steve Morgenstern\n\n Save a personal copy of this article and quickly find it again with Furl.net. It's free! Save it.\nThe Logitech unit is quite simply the best handheld scanner I've used--a combination of functional, innovative hardware design and powerful, easy-to-use scanning and image-editing software.\n\nThe size, shape, and feel of a handheld scanner matter a lot, and I find the Logitech unit fits my hand exceptionally well. To solve the common problem of the unit wiggling as you pull it across the original, the Logitech has been designed with one wide roller in the front and two smaller ones in the rear, providing a smooth, stable motion.\n\nThe second major problem with hand scanners is velocity--if you move the scanner too quickly (usually very easy to do), your results suffer from serious distortion. Logitech tackled this challenge with a Scanning Speed Indicator light that's clearly visible on the top of the unit. If you're moving at an appropriate speed the indicator glows green. Move a little to quickly, and it turns yellow. Exceed the speed limit entirely, and it turns red, indicating that you'd better start over.\n\nAnother smart design decision is the use of a single press of the scanning button to turn the unit on and keep it on until you indicate completion of your scan by hitting the keyboard Return (or Enter) key. Too many handheld scanners expect you to hold that button down throughout the scan--and that constant pressure makes it too easy to move the scanner off course.\n\nThe other key to Logitech's success is the Ansel image-editing software included with the unit. Running under Microsoft Windows 3.0 (which must be purchased separately), Ansel combines basis ease of use with several powerful filtering commands. I have been able to dramatically improve scans of mediocre originals by employing. Ansel's Smooth, Sharpen, and Equalize commands.\n\nThe only negative involved in using the ScanMan is the size of the unit--its scanning width measures just 4.1 inches across. Ansel does allow you to "stitch" two separate scans together to create a full-width image--it works reasonably well with line art, but photographs are more problematic. As long as you're working with reasonably small originals (snaphsot-size photos or modest-size clip-art images), though, the ScanMan produces remarkably high-quality output at a very reasonable price.\n\nCOPYRIGHT 1992 Freedom Technology Media Group\nCOPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group
1002682
Here are the pros and cons that I have for you:\n\nPRO\nOne of the better models by Palm as far as features a person really uses vs nice to have\n\nCON\n$199 is too much for this model.  You can easily find it for less than $150.
1181663
I agree with you about not running 2 at once. I've not done a head to head comparison, but I do use NOD32. I find it less resource intense than some of the their scanners I've used and I'm impressed with how frequently they update the signature file. The interface needs some work though as it's not as intuitive as other programs.
824827
proactive is a little expensive about $40 but it does work well. i tried it and i began to see results after a week of using it
117011
Hummer i love it, and Echo by Davidoff they also have the after shave, my husband wears it all the time, and it lasts for a long time,and it smells fresh, it's not too strong. It is a bit expense but it is worth it.  Next time you got to a store try the samples you will love it :)