"To be or not to be!.That is the question"...for who? or, what for?
457139
for us..\nto be - is to exist with comapassion and emotional bonds with others and god..the right way..with a purpose..serve the mankind..serve GOD..\nnot to be - living without a purpose..like an empty shell..wasting away life...\n\nall meant for us..all..
1151174
yes, or no.... how are anyone of us on here supposed to know?
582231
... is this supposed to be a question????
361743
Like shakesphere once said:\nTo be (make no sense)or not to be (make sense).
248965
is this supposed to be a question?
105881
...and your question is?
1147319
Perhaps both.\nThe two are not necessarily mutually exclusive.
1131032
And who might "us" be?
924922
Being what? Please clarify.
37519
So what is the question?
190727
Yes, but what is the question?
1116326
Why were we here? So that we can ask why we are here. And why should we ask why we are here? Because we are here and can ask why we are here.\nPretty absurd actually.
164480
This question is posed at the lowest point in Hamlet's life; father dead (murdered by his uncle), mother marries the uncle, who then plots Hamlet's own death.\n\nTo be, or not to be, that is the question: \n\nthe question posed by Hamlet – a trained mind; the question posed by the play centrally itself. The infinitive form ‘To be’ and ‘not to be’ posits a single compelling choice: Being or Non-being. It is the most radical choice we can make, suicide. \n\nWhether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer \nThe slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, \nOr to take arms against a sea of troubles \nAnd by opposing end them. \n\n\nThe question is re-expressed in terms of nobility of action; that is, whether it is nobler to endure or nobler to commit suicide. This is not a moral outlook. Rather it is chivalric as the metaphor ‘slings and arrows’ and the apparently mixed metaphor of taking up ‘arms against a sea of troubles’ suggests. The battle against ‘outrageous fortune’ is hopeless since it can marshal a ‘sea’ of force against which, as the mixed metaphor suggests, King Canute resistance is futile. However, by opposing one might successfully provoke one’s own destruction at fortune’s hands, which would end the matter honourably.
391702
.... and???\n\n\nI just know there has to be a question coming sooner or later......
826704
Oh my, people are trying hard to confuse you!\n\nI think we've all established that the verb should be ACCEPTS, right?\n\nSo, moving on: the pronoun must be HER. Why? It is the object of the preposition "except" and therefore must be in the objective, not the nominative, case.
303397
using the best of Boolean logic...\n\nbe or !be = 1.  always.  \n\nso, to be or not be is to be 1.  zen complete.
492586
So, and the question is???????????????