Does any other country have military bases in foreign lands like the USA does?
463142
to add to the above answers, the UK also has a major training base in Canada (CFB Suffield), and in Kenya
1103447
No it does not.  Here is a list of countries that do.
938824
not on base at all.  as for OCONUS, you  wouldn't be able to bring them in to any other country at all.  so, your options are off base housing stateside only.
627255
HELL NO!  America is tending to interfere in other countrys matters far too much. They should realise by now that the second world war ended in 1945 with the unification of italy. The two super powers were usa and Russia. Russia got over it that times change but its just that usa is still stuck on the whole "super power of the world" thing. What happens in iraq and the middle east is their concern and they will sort it out their way usa has no right to interfere. usa has oil reserves that it can use but it wants to use the oil in the middle east that belongs to them but then kinda mysteriously got under iraq. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
342454
Well, that's a complicated question and it's not possible to answer it in a paragraph. The US does have military presence in nearly every country on earth. Sometimes it's by our choice, and sometimes it's by the other country's choice. It's difficult to say whether it's good or bad because there are a variety of reasons we are in particular countries. For example, we are helping to protect South Korea from the North Korean government. But I think we have no legitimate reason to be in Iraq.
232352
yes, it does exist. It's a secret militay base. I've seen programs on it.
474481
no. altho they do have one. i think w/ the WW2 treaties it limits them.
877701
yes they do and there army is equipped with material that is state of the art.  They mostly operated in coordination with the Belgium army  ( Korea, SFOR,IFOR, etc) .  For the moment they do have troops in Afghanistan and I belief also in Lebanon
357731
Absolutely NOT. No other country has the resources and intelligence capabilities that the United States does. It would be logistically impossible for another country to lead the war on terror.\n\nIt is true, however, that other countries need to step up and commit to the war on terror. Recent terrorism has shown it does not care about national boundaries, religion, political philosophies or the status of civilians. The United States has a volunteer military of over 2,000,000 (including Reserves) who stay in because they believe in the fight and want to be part of the solution.\n\nThe former British colonies of the United States, England and Australia have been leading the fight since it began in earnest. Each of those countries is committed to the fight and has not faltered. They have the experience and the know-how to continue and lead the fight.
562743
Technically, the Marines call all their bases "camps", and the Army calls all their bases "forts" or "posts".  The Air Force and Navy call all of theirs "bases".  Thats it.
383961
No, our nation is currently building several permanent bases in Iraq.  We won't be out of there for a long time
180813
Every country that has an embassy has US Marines in it.  Between Joint Task Forces, Port Calls, Humanitarian Missions, War theaters, and anything I missed, I think the figure is 111 nations host US troops.
1134141
I feel they have every right to self defense just as any other country in the world.  Remember, the US isn't one to police the world in terms of nukes.  The US is the only country that has ever used it as a weapon in war time. No other country has.  The US is just another landmass on the map.  If one country can have mass killing weapons, then everyone else has the right to defend themselves as well.
962440
U.S.A., France\n\nNot- Horth Korea, Cuba
1114548
Permanent bases are being constructed there. We will never leave.\n\nWe need Iraq as a launching point for the next war (U.S./England/+the others who helped us in Iraq VS. Iran/China/Russia/+their allies).
87912
There are, as previously stated, embassies that belong to their respective nations.  However, the only lands that are owned by the U.S are public properties; as all private lands and structures are owned by, and therefore belong to, the private entities who own the titles to them (despite being protected, taxed, and in effect controlled by the U.S.).
778240
This is from memory so it's probably not complete, sorry.\nEngland, Spain, Barbary Coast States, Germany, Austria Hungary, Italy, Japan, North Viet Nam, Iraq.\n\nNorth Korea (US was part of UN forces).