Is "Agree to Disagree" an argumentive stalemate?
462873
When one person says "Let's agree to disagree" he is proposing a truce as it were, a resolution in which each side agrees that they will no longer try to convince the other, while continuing to hold opposing opinions.\n\nIf you thinking not winning = losing, then it constitutes a loss.  But I think a peace treaty such is not a loss -- and I certainly think proposing to do so is not a loss.  If the other person does not agree, then the person who proposed it can argue on with equal vigor.  In most casees, it is no sign of weakness to offer a truce.
1094952
some people just love to argue. they want to be right. even if you say they are right, they argue that you're "Just saying that so we dont' fight" ...and then suddenly you're arguing over that. although if it's a woman doing this, it CAN be b/c of hormones...if they aren't normally this way....so keep that in mind too.
492588
A weaker argument can defeat a stronger argument if it is worded more clearly and better than a stronger argument.  If you can't say what you have to say well (so that others can understand you), then you can't argue very well no matter how strong your argument is.  Also, some people like to argue with a loud voice and be very aggressive, and often they win arguments (even if their argument is weaker) due to intimidation and an inability for the other person to speak.\n\nOften, though, it is easier for a stronger argument to defeat a weaker argument.
675637
The only way to do this is to truthfully discuss what the old terms were and why there were problems before - you both have to be willing to compromise - if you can't then it is not worth it to begin with.
541030
Make it known to those who are forcing you that you disagree with this solution.  Do so TACTFULLY and make sure to back up your argument with facts and figures.  I would present this protest in written form.  If this doesn't work and your forced to continue, at least you have a written document of your protest and your reasons why.  This may help you from being the "fall guy", at least minimize your culpability if the "client" takes some sort of legal action.  Also, if there are any co-workers who agree with you, try to get them to "sign on" with you.  Good Luck!
1082937
*applauding*Thank you! Sometimes the only way to get along is to agree to disagree and move on.There's no need to be nasty about things.
982704
On Yahoo Answers? I doubt it! In real life interaction people face each other and have discussions, but the Internet is anonymous. Many people are more willing to state radical opinions in an extreme manner because there is less recourse and definitely less chance of getting punched in the nose. Could people get along? Yes if they chose to, but it is not going to happen. Much of what passes for political discussion on Yahoo Answers is purely designed to inflame rather than address actual issues of the day. Both sides are equally guilty and neither shows any evidence of change any time soon.\n\nEdit: The answers you are receiving here is a prime example of why it won't happen. In order for people to find common ground, they must first admit there is common ground. Just look at the answers here, most cannot fault their own side in the slightest, but instead place all the blame on the other.
1032745
There are two general ways of responding to an argument you disagree with: providing your own counter argument, or trying to silence the person, shut the argument down. In my experience, people tend to resort to the latter when they lack the eloquence or ideological consistency to develop their own rational argument. It's basically a panic reaction of being unable to defend their own position, but refusing to either admit this to themselves, or engage with the alternative point of view. Personally, I think that if you have a strong and consistent argument, it would be able to "defeat" alternative points of view purely through the strategy of confrontation and argumentation.\n\nSo if I were you, I would take the removal as a compliment. It means you've asked a question they can't answer!
1167221
I think people are bound to say things which they don't really mean down deep inside esp when an arguement is going on.My thought is he did apologize and sometimes that's about all one can do.I have heard actions speak louder than words. As long as the person treats another with respect then I wouldn't hold one arguement over thier head forever.
366407
Conflict is essential to growth of the society. History has proved that. So it is necessary that difference of opinion are expressed and they clash with each other. \n\n"Let a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of thought contend" - Chairman Mao Tse Tung
100919
Sounds like you're at the point where you agree to disagree.
979499
Pick and choose your battles wisely.  Stand up for yourself if it is something you really believe in.  Otherwise, if it's something he really believes in, listen, be understanding, and just let it be.  It's not worth the aggravation to always argue or that you always have to win.  I think its really important to only argue when absolutely necessary.  If you are not wanting to get into a fight; let him know, and stop the conversation.  Sometimes, later I'll even get an apology for it.  I just don't make a big deal out of it.  They appreciate that.
916450
Check  the link of the source. You see that there are some disagreement
9154
Right in the middle of an "argument" jump in & point out to both of them that they fight & argue constantly. Point out the fact that it is very childish & how tired you are of it. Whatever the underlying problem is between them should/will surface....once that surfaces, it can be resolved & harmony restored.
306423
This arguement will never end.
969904
How a person responds to an argument is not a guy or girl issue . . . it's how the individual (no matter the gender) handles the response and situation of an argument.  How to handle this issue, no matter if it was the guy or the girl . . . when things are calm...maybe even several days or weeks later...tell your sweetie something to the effect of "I'm uncomfortable of how we argue...I'd like to openly discuss this so we can clarify some understanding and set up some 'ground rules' for when we have disagreements."  Then sit down and openly share what you do and don't care for in your style of 'arguing'.  Remember to share not only what you don't like but also what you do like.  Maybe your girlfriend will share that her style is to be left alone for a certain period of time before you two relate together again.  You both express your thoughts and then begin negotiations and agreed boundaries.  All this really needs is COMMUNICATION.  I don't feel enough couples really have healthy respectful communication skills.  One person shouldn't have to back down and chase after the other.  And it's not right for the other one not to accept a sincere apology that included the acknowledgment of what they felt was hurtfully projected.  You and your sweetie sit down and openly discuss what style of relating (and understanding of the others) mode of relating and arguing best suits the two of you.  A relationship is in part like a business, discuss and find what works best for the healthy success of your (business) relationship.  Though in a relationship...there are the perks of love and kisses.
897872
Should they have actually said conciliatory olive branch?\n\nThat would be to make a move to reconcile differences and move forward with a relationship, sort of a 'mend broken fences' type of thing.