Why U.S.A. can't conquer the whole world ?
462905
Wow i would never have thought someone would think that could be a good thing.\nThe USA CAN INDEED conqueur the world\nwho would stop them? they have the most efficient deadly military in the world... the most advanced weapons... they know all the secrets of the world and beyond our planet that we do not... their allies go far beyond what we think we know. World leaders are all of the same bread.. they dont care what the world is called all those power hungry assholes care about is having us all on a leash. Im happy that in the middle east at least SOME PEOPLE are fighting for freedom. \nIt fkn pisses me off to think that people encourage the war that is going to lead to our demise and continue to send their children and themselves to fight for a force that doesnt give a shit about you or anyone you know.\n\nWHY would you want to be slaves?\nThe day people everywhere begin to see that being a good thing is the exact same day we forfeit all our rights.... you might as well just kill urself if ur going to be that fkn stupid.. let the rest of us who want a decent world for the future of man take care of things
522599
because the USA wont allow it
1079169
The realities of the oil crunch and energy-hungry nations have forced many countries into a potential global conflict. We can't back away from it but we could limit it by producing alternative sources of power. While the US sanctions the war in Iraq (as a source of black gold),it condemns China for seeking the same in African countries...by peaceful means! The American government has been led by wealth over many years,and the current administration is not an exception. Perhaps we should require a different document....not of independence but a curriculum vitae of elected officials as well as proof of their financial dealings.
442832
Terrorists don't want to rule the whole world, they just want to be in control of their own countries.  They attack the US because they think "western influence" is ruining their values, and that we're messing around in their business too much.  Keep in mind that they've said they only attack nations who are active in the Middle East, they don't attack Swedes or I dunno, Ugandans.  \n\nWell, not all terrorists.  Plenty of groups just represent minorities who are getting the shaft from their own government.  And in at least a few cases, they've actually made a difference (Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, for example).\n\nIt's the fanaticism of Middle Easterners that's scary.  And the fact that rather than attacking their own governments and people, they're attacking ours.  \n\nDoes Bush care?  I think he does...no one wants to see American citizens killed.  Does he care as much or more about looking good and living up to his father's reputation?  Probably.
371943
No, I think a much larger and the main reason why the world dislikes the U.S.A. is because we have a free society that is a challenge to continuously downplay in favor of their own system.\n\nI also believe that a far greater undermining of our country is done by people who don't know the difference between sedition and dissent.  I can disagree with President Bush's policies and decisions, and present evidence for why.\nI can also undermine my own country by calling him names and spreading rumors.
1095564
No, the worlds gov's don't "serve" the USA, more like take every advantage of the USA. If you look at the United Nations for instance, ninety +% of the nations we provide billions of $$$ in aid to every year vote AGAINST us more than 60% of the time on resolutions. So, no, we are not the puppet master, or we would not have the issues in the middle east that we now face. Not to mention the rest of the world.
1016089
WTF? America never did any good for the world everything they do is for their benefit not others. Why don't people realize that America is the biggest threat to the world? They are the most pride and arrogant nation in the modern world. This country is ran by rich people who don't know anything about life. America is a nation of war and always have been and always will be.\n\nWho is it that took this land and take credit for discovering it, and never paid for it? Then they say things like this happen all the time so it okay. But if someone do that to them then they are a threat when America did it to someone else. Why is it OK for America to Nuke other nations it's because it war so it's okay. But when others want nukes to Nuke America like they did others it not okay. \n\nDo not y'all realize that the money spent is not for good but control the want the world to be in check, they want a New World Order."who can make war with the beast" if the beast always keeps the upper hand in war. US will destroy any nation that try to advance in war with nukes. So when one nation have so much control in the world. Any wicked man can control the world if they can get the power of a nation like this in their hands.\n\nLike the war in Iraq instead of of admitting they were wrong their pride gets in the way and say "we did the right thing by getting him out of power". They never take any responsibility for what they do. If this nation can't discipline itselfs then God will.
828343
unfortunately not.  Too many people in India compared to US.  Unless India attacks america and occupy its land...they stands no chance.  There are very few countries in the world that did invade other coutries and occupied land.  India and China are two such countries.  No wonder why these two countries are now  over crowded.
393411
Because the US is too busy trying to tell people how to live thier life. The world will never be unified until they all have the freedom they deserve.
1099006
Because a failure in Iraq is  failure to America and our standing in the world will go down.  If we leave prematurely the entire world will see America doesn't stick it out to the end.  That is a position we as a country cannot have if we expect our allies to stand by us.\n\nBesides, we lucked up and got the moth to the flame effect there.  The terrorist have gone to Iraq to run us out.  They are now there for us to fight and kill, and it is better to fight them there than fight them here.  They have shown they have no intention of leaving us alone.
352834
Often the goal of the united states was to be isolationist whenever possible as for much of the time we were still growing in strength as well. However, what you find in a lot of occasions, is that in the south america, or in the pacific, the united states gets involved to protect their interest. They intervne in order to gain territory, protect their ally, or whatever they case may be. They do it in Cuba, Panama, the Philippines among other places.
973906
There is a difference between protecting the United States and taking the war to the rest of the world. The US does not just have an army on US soil, but almost a third of the planet has US forces occupying it. The enemies of the US are the people that do not want US forces occupying their lands.
985974
You are really saying a lot of BS.\nEngland is a tiny, powerless, impish little country.\nThe US is the most powerful country in the world, even if our current president is an idiot !!
682941
The thing of being a super power after the second world war kinda got to americas head. Now japan rules it has the power and tech. to take on america but it dosent show off like america. America just pokes its nose in other poeples business they just wanna show that still are in power but reality check. they aint!   like for instance the time when tensions grew between india and pakistan.USA barged in and told they wont let a war take happen they just want a piece of the action, what happened then india told them to back off this is our issue and we will resolve it.
933520
The insertion of troops was a major mistake. The entire region under Islamic influence from Morocco to Indonesia is far less stable as a result. The U.S. is increasingly seen as dictatorial by increasing numbers of people around the world. Our economy has been vastly weakened. We do not have enough troops available should other emergencies develop. The Civil War, denied by the Bush administration but acknowledged as being fully underway by the rest of the world, deepens daily and leaves American troops there as sitting ducks. There can be no victory in Iraq. Just as the British learned after World War I, the Iraqis will not be conquered. There is too much value underground (oil) and too much division above-ground. The only result of continued occupation will be increasing governmental debt for the U.S. and more dead and injured American soldiers. Military contractors such as Halliburton are being enriched. The Bush administration has no idea of what they mean by "victory", nor does Tony Blair in England.
768344
I wonder this myself some times, especially by countries which really do not have all that great relationships with the U.S, such as N.Korea, China, and Russia just to name a few. An invasion against the U.S. will only be possilbe if invaders ally, I do not see it possible that one country can invade the U.S. though.
487681
No need to conquer them.  Just ask them if they'd like us to annex them.  Put it up for vote in a Mexican election (We should allow Mexicans here to vote in it too).  America is great.  They know it, we know it, why not expand?