Smart@ss answers only please.  What is the future of Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI) and the Democratic Party.?
455296
He's going to move to nebraska and be the next Miss America. Those legs....mmmm. Of course Fiengold will get the support he needs to become a transvestite. HE WILL BE ELECTED Miss USA
380132
Of the three candidates who has a website listing in the list of nominations, none of them state if they are a member of a polticial party. My only advice would be to contact all of the candidates and ask if they have ever been, are or if elected intend to take the GOP, Dem, Green, Constituition, Libertarian whip or are they pure Independents?
151943
if you take all our troops home right now what would happen to the fledgling democracy in irag? or afganistan?\nI am not a demorcrat or a republican......to many brain cells still living... but  I have enough sense to realize that if we withdraw today....thousand more innocents will die...I am torn.....I dont think that even one more american should lose thier life in that region...  we cant force democracy on people.....they dont seem to understand it or want it.......look at palistine.....years of fight for freedom .....they are there and what do they do? vote for the monsters that attack innocents.......what the hell....? being a pacifist is also not the anwser....those folks dont respect weakness.... think if we send a message loud and clear you kill one americian.... journalist...and the pain begins......will get thier attention.....I am rambling again.......and to all the haters of republicans...\nlook what the demorcrat party has done to Mass...and Ca..\n I have been to both states...live there...if you are a working person......you are taxed out yur u know what...?\nwhy ? entitlements for the masses who vote for demorcrats.......but it cant be paid for.......so thier solution...taxes taxes taxes.......soon the business move... from cali to nevada ..arizona ect... mass.... well I am rambling sorry......hit a couple of nerves.. Peace
930362
DEMOCRATS WON!\nRUMSFELD RESIGNED!\nDeal with it, Repubs
728042
no one knows\n\nprolly nader AGAIN\ngulliani and mc cain for the GOP\nnot sure about the dems
506806
How about E...f u c k the republicans and f u c k the democrats.  Hopefully some new party will emerge in that time that takes the baseline consevative look with a feel for liberal change.  All I know is I'm voting for S.B. Squarepants, Esq. again...he'd do a better job that any constituent backed monkey puppet that runs.
846981
I would submit that personality had little to do with the election. I am Repub as they get and will admit GW is no prize. GW may be smart (or not)..in either case he comes off like a jackass.\n\n The Dems had simply gone too far left. Gun Control, sexual "anything goes" policies and ever more government does not sit well with the older generation. I'm talking those 60+ who vote faithfully. Maybe when that generation and mine dies out the goverment can go ahead and progress to the Dems dream of a Nanny State. There are enough of us left that can do for ourselves,thank you, without needing the likes of Al/Bill/Hillary looking out for us.\n\nGovernments should build infrastructure and defend the country, and little else....something sadly even the Repubs are forgetting these days.
1064363
I'm trying to figure a way we can vote him in for a third and fourth term like FDR got.  Oh, I know they changed that rule by Amendment, but, seeing how the democrats got a President for four terms, I think it only fair that we Republicans get the same, and now that we're in the middle of a war like FDR was, I can't imagine a better time to re-elect GWB to a third and fourth term.  God Bless America, One Nation Under God.
804648
YES YES YES YES!!!!!\nthat would be the end of the democrat party
1103767
Russ Feingold, the communist senator from Wisconsin, is so liberal - of course he supports abortion in every way, shape and form to the point that a woman could probably drop her baby in a dumpster on the way to the delivery and it would be a matter of "choice" to him. He hates the President, loves taxes, wants to cut and run in Iraq, and basically does not have a principaled, honest, courageous bone in his body. The liberals will love him - I think they should nominate him for President.
161930
I haven't seen any up-and-coming democrats.  I'm starting to get worried.  The party is still unfocussed, and right now there are marvelous opportunities with so many in the republican party under investigation or in other trouble - the demos need to take action!  \n\nbtw – thanks for your nice answer to my question tonight!  I like you, you’re cool.
860679
I really think we will see a virtual stalemate for the next 2 years and I do not believe it will be because of the Republicans. Many of the Democrat leadership are beholding to the far left, but many of the newly elected Democrats are much more moderate. Personally I think what you will see is a lot of Democrat infighting, especially if the remaining Republicans stand up for traditional conservative principles. The one area where I am very worried is on the illegal immigration front. I think there is a definite chance that they will try to pass the Kennedy/McCain immigration bill from the Senate. The stumbling block before was the House, but that block has been removed and if it makes it to the President' desk he will sign it because it is exactly what he has wanted all along.
862360
During the election Lieberman said he would caucus with the Democrats.  Last Friday he said he will be a Democrat, as expected, to retain his Senate seniority.\n\nHe would most likely be chair of Homeland Security since he is the ranking member.  That is a position dear to him and one he is good at.  Besides, since the party ran and campaigned against him they will have to over him a bone to keep his allegiance on the issues where he disagrees with the party.  A 51-49 split doesn't leave much room for dissent.
867166
There is no reason to be any more concerned today than you were yesterday. The Democrats won the House. What did they really win? They won the right to make the president a lame duck. Mr. Bush can still veto any legislation they try to pass and the Democrats do not have a 2/3 Senate majority required to over ride a veto. The Democrats say they want change, so here's their chance. We will see in the coming days if Democrats really want change for all Americans and are willing to reach across the aisle, or if they just want power. Either way do not expect much to change in the next 2 years. If anything this election has almost guaranteed that nothing substantive will happen in that time.\n\nmrfoxhorn: I have to take exception with a few of your statements.\nI am middle class, I do not make 200K a year. I make more money than I did during the Clinton administration and I am paying less in taxes.\nBecause one man in the Republican party solicited a teenage boy, it does not make the entire Republican party gay. This is one the most ridiculous statements Democrats make.\nThe Republicans did not handcuff Mr. Clinton with Monica. Mr. Clinton created his own woes by lying about the affair under oath. Credibility and honesty from our leaders (all of them) may not matter to you, but it is very important to me.\nI do not blame Mr. Clinton for 9/11, I blame terrorists. What I blame Mr. Clinton for in regard to terrorism is his administrations direct efforts to hamper intelligence gathering and sharing. \nThe idea that the Democrats will build up the military stands in stark opposition to their actual record on military spending. How do you think Mr. Clinton was able to balance the budget? It wasn't by cutting social programs, but rather by dessimating the military and intelligence communities.\nDemocrats have won the midterm, you wanted change and now you have it. Pointing fingers at the other side for their failings isn't going to work anymore. Democrats now have to take responsibilty and start showing us what positive change they propose for America. I am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt in this area, but I honestly believe they will fail miserably unless they change their thinking and move forward rather than looking back.
166026
He is no longer a congressman, as of January 16th. The district's offices are still open and staffed until the vacancy is filled, and their contact info is at the site below.\n\nEdit: Sorry, didn't realize he had become Senator. You can e-mail him at the site below. They prefer not to receive direct e-mail.
129600
Let's hope he does.\nLike the last time, he'll take a lot of the far-left liberal votes away from the Democrats.
889653
I hope so. . .The unfortunate truth and sad realization is; it proves that our democracy is mostly dependent on money to win elections.\n\nHopefully, this can be addressed and fixed.   The Dem's have spent more than ever, and were very close in spending to what the Reps have. (To win and have payed less is encouraging, and shows a good sign, however, it bothers me to think about where the money came from).\n\nIf the Democrats have resorted to taking funds the same way as the Reps, then we have a change in name only. I hope not, as I am a Democrat, and I personally despise the fact that you need money to win.\n\nThank you all for voting. . .Great Job