how long is a search good for after a judge singe it?
471220
You're asking how long a search warrant is good for after a judge has signed it, right?  Little tough to tell.\n\nIn California, search warrants are good for ten days from the date of issue.  They can be extended for good cause, or a new warrant can be sought.\n\nTo give you a good answer, you're going to have to tell people what state you're in.
1023763
Depends on charge type, you have to convince a judge you have cause, but it is standard operating procedere in all DV cases. If you want it droped then you both have to apperar before the judge.\n\nGood Luck, Im looking at 1-3 years because of the system
754702
Chances are very good if he's already on probation.  It's up to the individual judge, but most cases I've heard of like this did get jail time.
340194
My understanding and work experience has been "it depends on the circumstances".  If both parties are in agreement, it can go very smoothly and I've seen a response back in 1-2 days.  Other times, when the case is rough, it has been know to take longer -  up to a week.
170758
Turn youself in. Recieve judgemnt from the judge. Then travel accordingly.
887259
It depends on what the judge set at the trial.  It could be anywhere from 2-5 years.  You need to find out what time frame the judge gave.
390231
Depends on when the judge makes the decision.Followup with your lawyer.
896344
It all depends on the subject matter.  For very urgent applications, an ex parte application can be made to a judge in chambers, in which case it is a matter of hours!  Otherwise, it depends on how full the court list is.
963944
probably after the appeal
432374
A hearing can be any length of time.  It depend on what its about.  Usually one day or less, but the Nixon-Watergate hearings went on for about a year - so you need to ask the judge.\n\n====\n\nA child support hearing also varies, but unless you expect a big legal fight, they are usually just a few hours once yours actually starts.  Usually what happens is that the ex-wife goes in and tells the judge how much money she wants so that she can afford to drive the kids to school in a BMW and buy a new house in a better neighborhood.  Then the guy says how poor he is and why he can't afford what the mother wants.  Usually, the judge is male and the guy gets shafted in amongst all the alligator tears.  Its best to negotiate these things ahead of time so that there are fewer surprises.
619763
Depends on the court.  Mostly, keep records in order.
314665
When was the warrant issued?  If it wasn't issued till the 27th then of course it was an illegal search on the 26th.  If it was signed off by a judge but not entered into the system till the 27th then it would be a legal search.  If it was signed off on the 26th or before but the date is entered incorrectly into the system then that won't cause a problem as long as it was correct when the judge signed it.  If it was issued in a manner which specficed that it could only be done on the 27th (not common, but can occur) then the search on the 26th was illegal.  Without a bit more information to know what each date truly is that's the best I can provide.  Also what date was the search actually executed? If it's marked as the 26th but it was truly the 27th then they have to amend the complaint form, but once that's done there's no problem.
721134
It all depends on the judge.  In California, for instance, judges have up to 90 days to issue a ruling.  I know some judges that will issue a ruling immediately.  Meanwhile, I know one judge in particular who will almomst always wait until the 90th day to give you a ruling.  It's infuriating but there isn't much you can do about it.  Judges have a tremendous amount of autonomy.  Once the case is submitted to him/her for ruling, all you can do is hurry up and wait.
962330
I am not a supreme court scholar, but if evidence of a separate crime is discovered during an initial search, which is later found to have been faulty this is called fruits of the original search or something to that effect.  The answer to the best of my knowledge is that no, the fruits of the orignal search would be inadmissable.  However, I believe that there have been some recent Supreme Court rulings that may have loosen the rules in this regard.  If the orignal search was based upon good intentions, the new rules might just allow those previously poisoned fruits to be admitted.  Any legal scholars out there??
242073
It will depend on\n\n1.  The judge of the court where the sentence was issued\n\n2.  How long it has been, they will want to see enough time passed.  Not just months but years\n\n3.  They will want to see you prove you have not had any more bad checks for a long period of time\n\n4,  Also if you can show you have gotten more education, worked steady, did something with your life it all helps
692252
It will take usually 90 days up to one year to place it on the docket.  The Supreme Court has within 7 years to make a decision.  That is the maximum that they have to decide on your case.  If not, your case can go into default, and after 3 times in default if no ruling has been made then you can be determined to win your case.
241429
It depends on a number of factors, including the type of case, which state and which court.  In California, for example, you must serve a serve a judgment debtor at least 10 days before a debtor's exam.  In other cases, you must give "reasonable" notice.  Federal court may be different.