What does it take for world peace to accomplish?
463056
Peace is not natural to human beings because we cant live in peace....Did you graduate from a public school?\n\nLearn about something called scarcity...\n\nThe world has limited resources....we dont have enough resources for everyone...\n\nYou are just like any other animal in the jungle...you must eat and drink....protect your young ......so they can survive and prosper...\n\nOur planet doesnt have enough food for everyone....we dont have enough houses and cars....oil....water....etc..etc..\n\nSo if your kids were starving to death.....and you knew your neighbors had food but would not share....what are you going to do?\n\nMost of us all live in western nations.....we are used to living in a certain way.....everyone in here who says things like we should share and etc....fine...but that means:\n\n1. You will live in a much smaller house..(maybe 800 sq. ft)\n2. You will drive 1 car...(for your whole family..a small ugly car too)\n3. You will have 1 computer per house\n4. Your medical care will have to be drastically cut. To even out your lifespan with the worlds.\n5.Western people will need pay cuts so we can increase the worlds pay.\n\netc...etc...etc...and you females dont need makeup and plastic surgery ...etc etc....\n\nbut you get the point...\n\nMost of us westerners are not lowering our standard of living for the world.....We would rather kill them and take what they have to increase our standard
530852
Get all the world's leaders into a room & refuse to let them out until they had come up with a solution to world hunger & stopping wars.\nSurely if one nation has more than enough & another has none then it isn't rocket science to work out that the rich nations should give to the poor.\nEvery world leader today seems to think only of their own country instead of the world as a whole. Except for GW Bush of course, he thinks he is the leader of the world & needs to be taken done a peg or two.
565558
Treat others with love and respect.\nStrive for justice and peace.
666636
What does "World Peace" mean to you?\n\nReally... I mean, they all seem to want it. It would be nice to know what they actually think it is, wouldn't you say?\n\nGoodluck!
240091
The problem with "world peace" is in the definition from culture to culture.  Different cultures have different views on "peace".  Many in Western Cultures view "world peace" as a utopia where armed forces are never needed and we all work together for the common cause of advancing Humanity and self-fullfillment.  The minority Whahabbists Islam sect (Taliban/Al Qeada's brand of Islam) views "world peace" as everyone with dissenting views is dead or enslaved.  A Serb may view "peace" as having no living Bosnians or Kosovar Albainians alive and vice-versa.  Hitler's view of "world peace" was having no Jews... Oddly this is the same view many "anti-war" protesters share according to their writings and protest signs.\n\nIt is a sad fact that most of the world is increadibly cuturally ignorant.  The "Blame America" crowd makes one believe this is a problem unique to the USA, but it is not.  Far too many in the world are willfully ignorant of other cultures.  Oddly enough, or maybe not, the US Military is spending large sums of money to teach service members to be fluent in other languages (Rossetta Stone) and training in other cultures.  This, in turn, causes mission overseas to be more successfull and builds better friendships.  Though it will take time for this to fully come into play.\n\nSo the biggest problem is the lack of a common definition of "world peace".  If the world cannot even agree on a definition for "peace", then it will be difficult to attain.  Unfortunatly, it may take an influence outside humanity for us to unite (an asteroid strike, truly massive natural devistation, or some such factor, and then the unification would only last for a short while).
1136195
Two years.  First, war it would only be in the Middle East and Sub-saharan Africa.  The apathetic world leaders would sit on the sidelines while the world struggles, but soon after those areas are completely devoid of any decent human beings to murder and terrorize, violence would spread thoughout the world, eventually comsuming everything.
324058
There would be peace in the middle east and the whole world
827393
Every man, woman, and child deserves to experience world peace.
320848
World Peace.  It would benefit every single person.
1058169
World peace is such a beautiful idea, isn't it? I would really love for everyone to be able to get along. However, realistically speaking, that just isn't how things are. Wars have existed since the beginning of times, and I'm sure will continue throughout the end of times. The reason being is because there are more greedy, selfish, hateful SOBs out in the world than there are loving people. Everyone always wants to be right, and many will to go whatever lengths to try to prove it. \nIt's a sad and cruel world.
700647
No, because everyone would actually want world peace. 9/11, the embassy bombings, the Cole, London, Spain.... these show clearly, that peace is not at the forefront of the enemies mind. \n\nSo, no.
1178047
I think the key is for each and every one of us to live and do his or her part. Instead of me thinking of countries or leaders or someone else, I start with myself. What am I doing? What can I do to make a difference? The answer can be enlightening and simple. Every time I am with another human being, I can be a person of peace. I can smile. I can show deference and respect for the other. In my mind, I can keep from passing judgment on anyone or catch myself if I start to do it. In other words, peace starts with me. And it starts with you. It begins with each one of us. Stay nice. Stay happy.
363749
New World Order means that all developed countries should work together to achieve the common goal, which is, a harmonious and peaceful world under US dominance. It is a legion but not practical at all. George W. Bush.. he obtained more than 50% vote in 2004 election. If you trust the wisdom of American voters, give Bush a chance, don't give up too early, he still has 2 years to become a respectful president in United States history.
513228
Uniting religion, will not happen, too hard. Nations, no way, government, isn't that same as nations!  Peace on Earth! will not happen as long as we continue with our struggle against each others.  The least unity possible is religion, no matter how much we try, we will never see it, at lest in our life time, and these days it is getting less and less possible to be.
807031
no, with the US here now, there is no world peace. It would be more violent though
39661
Unfortunately I think it's nearly impossible to achieve true peace throughout the world.  I think if we as people would look inside ourselves and try to be the best person we can be and to do good towards others instead of judging them and thinking that they should agree with us and want what we want. I think if people realized that each person choses their path and they have that a right to that choice and if we respect that there would be more peace in the world in general.  Peace begins within one's self.
1037433
Depends on every human being... I dont think religion is the answer, since everybody actually thinks their religion is the only true one and dismiss the rest... We can obtain peace only if we all think about making peace, peace is inside each one of us.