Which play left a deep impression on Gandhiji?
472790
Harishchandra & Shravana Kumar
758863
Manmohan Singh\nits bcause of his economic reforms that we r all proud to say that we r indians\n\ni also feel Indira Gandhi was a great leader
646189
Dear girl, first of all you need to be specific - is it Shakeapeare you are talking about?\n\nSecondly, it's Mark Antony in Shakespeare (not Antonio).\n\nBrutus gives a logical, unemotional speech winning the crowd over to the suggestion of making Brutus the new Caesar. Antony halts the crowd's support for the conspirators with a masterful speech that plays on the crowd's emotions.\n\nBrutus' speech was full of authoritative words while Antony appealed to the mob's emotions. While Brutus tried to show Caesar in anegative light, Antony tried to show Brutus is a very postive light. The use of rhetoric is also potrayed beautifully.
434216
a lot of shakespeares plays are examples. they are plays written in the middle ages (medieval times) that have a hidden moral adn your suposed to learn something from them
600048
One of the reasons that Iago is considered among the greatest villians in Shakespeare, if not Western Literature, is his lack of any real motivation.  The SparksNotes page below does a nice job, however, of providing passages with insight into your question.  As there is no single answer you can use passages in the play to support many different thesis.
931862
It's always seemed that way to me, anti-Semitism was quite common in Shakespeare's day, and nothing in his life or writings suggest that he was any kind of a social reformer.  He wrote what the people paying him wanted to hear because that was his job.  Almost none of what he wrote about Richard III was true, he was, after all, writing for the Grand-daughter of the man who usurped Richard's throne, just as Sir Thomas More, the originator of most of the mis-information, was writing for the man himself, but he told it so brilliantly that the play has eclipsed the facts.  Most performances of "Merchant of Venice" that I've seen show Shylock as an evil man getting his just deserts, it is the mark of Shakespeare's brilliance that it could be just as validly played other ways.  A truly great play doesn't have only one interpretation, I've seen both Lawrence Olivier and Derek Jacobi as Hamlet, the interpretations were total opposites and both worked, that is what the actor contributes.  Never forget, Shakespeare's plays were meant to be watched, not read, you never get the full effect any other way.  I used to live in London, and I've seen several performances by the Royal Shakespeare Company, all of them enriched my appreciation of the plays far beyond what I could get just reading.
1115438
Shakespeare...he was a partier.
679943
umm, it's a play\nTry www.sparknotes.com
567529
DDLJ... SHOLAY...you can watch them any number of times. \n\nrecent movies :-\n\nLakshya- highly inspiring\nBlack-   deeply moving\n\nSarkar,Company :- Ramu at his best
651521
Try sparknotes.com you may be able to find an analysis of the play.\n\nPesonally, I sometimes need the extra help because I don't know what Shakespheare is talking about.
463648
Gandhi, Jesus, and Bob Dylan.
150803
Well, I believe that play features a character simply called the "Narrator."  He is a third-person perspective on all events in the 'town.'  I would say that third-person perspective might be considered a literary element.
683952
Gandhi was the hope and role model (even for the leaders) for the Indians. Gandhi believed in a non-violence fight to reach their independence and Gandhi made sure of that.
774276
Sonia gandhi ,lal krishna advani
614485
well, Arjun is not bad at all...\nbut my all time favourite is:  <ding-dong!>  Shahrukh Khan!!\n\nlove him!!!!..
777022
"I do not believe that any book or person or event in my life ever made so great an impression on me as the plays of Shakespeare. They appear to be the work of some heavenly genius." \n- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe \nhttp://www.humanitiesweb.org/human.php?s=l&p=c&a=t&ID=9\n\n\nAlso, he made a speech regarding Shakespeare:\n\n Goethe's enthusiastic Rede zum Schakespears Tag (“Conversation from Shakespeare's Day”), had appeared after Goethe's return to Frankfurt in August 1771. \nhttp://poets.aspirennies.com/private/SiteBody/Romance/Poetry/Goethe/Johann_Wolfgang_von_Goethe_Introspection_and_Religious_Mysticism.shtml\n\nHis first contribution in the 1771-1775 period was to unleash the Shakespeare mania for which the Sturm und Drang movement is famous. His speech *Zum Shaekespaers Tag* (For Shakespeare's Day, 1854) was presented two months after his return from Strasbourg; a dithyrambic celebration of Shakespeare as a poet of nature, it has remained one of the great milestones of German Shakespeare criticism. Even more influental was the Shakespearean history play Goetz von Berlichingen mit der eisernen Hand (Goetz von Berlichingen with the Iron Hand; translated as Goetz von Berlichingen, 1799), first drafted in November 1771 and published in a revised version two years later. The play is based on a sixteenth century chronicle in which the old baron Goetz tries to maintan his independence in the face of the encroaching empire . In the resulting conflict between traditionand law Goetz's side degenerates, against his will, into open rebellion. The evil of the court is embodied in the beautiful Adelheid, who seduces Goetz's old friend Weislingen into breaking his engagement to Goetz's sister Marie. After Weislingen marries Adelheid, she poisons him. Goetz dies in prison, welcoming the freedom of a higher world. The play is written in prose (the form of Wieland's translation of Shakespeare), with explisive diction and many short scenes. The emphasis on the prosaic aspects of Shakespearean diction and structure shows that the play is not only a statement in favor of Shakespeare but also a rejection of the orderly elegance of French neoclassical form for German drama.  \nhttp://worldroots.com/brigitte/goethe1.htm
1123412
MAHATMA.\nSITA.\nTHYAGARAJA.\nSANGH.PARIWAR.\n\nDO YOU MEAN LAXMAN?