Which one is the better show WWE RAW or WWE Smack Down? Why?
459496
Neither. WWE is too much of a soap. TNA is a bit better but if you are looking for technical skills with no flashing lights and 'biggin' it all up, then you want World of Sport
440295
NONE world wrestling entertainment is better
544818
WWE Firday Night Smackdown Rocks!!!\n\nWWE Friday Night SmackDown! is a professional wrestling TV show that airs in the United States on UPN, in Canada on The Score Network, in India on Ten Sports, in the UK, Republic of Ireland and mainland Europe on Sky Sports, in Portugal on SIC Radical, in Australia on FOX8 and in Finland on SubTV. It is produced by World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) and is the main broadcast of the SmackDown! brand. The show was previously seen by wrestling fans as WWE's "B show" to its older counterpart, the live Monday night show RAW. Since the brand extention, the show has raised in both ratings and recognition and is treated on screen as the on-par competition to RAW. Between 2003 and 2004 the show suffered again with some believing there was increased attention put on RAW, but since the 2005 draft, and the move from Thursday nights to Friday nights, SmackDown! has risen to prominance once again.\n\nThe SmackDown! stars typically perform four shows in a week. WWE usually tapes its Tuesday evening show for UPN to air on Friday evening of the same week. However, the show is occasionally broadcast live. From its launch in 1999, SmackDown! was shown on Thursday nights, but as of September 9, 2005, the show moved to Friday nights [1]. To reflect this change, the show is now referred to as Friday Night SmackDown!
846388
i like TNA better than WWE
253565
you can go to www.wwe.com go to tv shows smackdown
327464
it was gr8\n\nit was the wrestling that i like\n\nthere should be ECW every week like raw and smack down
808269
www.gamesfaq.com\n\nthis is the smackdown raw page:-\n\nhttp://www.gamefaqs.com/search/index.html?game=wwe+smackdown+raw+06&platform=0\n\n.
1040162
Trish.  Beth has some major skills, but Trish has a lot more experience and, in comparing the two wrestling styles, the best strategy in breaking-down her opponents in the ring.
717080
what storyline? its all boring. they show the same things again and again.\n\n\nex- smackdown_\n\n1 person comes out then 2 persons come and beat him up then another person comes and helps the forst person and GM comes out and says tonight TAG team Match and the Crows cheer (i dont kow why) they are all boring story lines .\n\nhey but i still watch wwe
628650
On saturday June 3 WWE & "See No Evil" present RAW Live! - Bowling Green, KY 7:30 p.m. and On sunday June 25 WWE presents SmackDown Live! - Pikeville, KY 7:00 p.m\n\nHope it helps you out =)
394495
Monday Night Raw is on USA channel\nand Friday Night Smackdown is on UPN
709455
unfortunately I missed the live events this time but have been to a few in the past and I have to say that raw kicks smackdown's butt. Much more atmosphere and crowd noise.
828753
smackdown vs Raw 2006
1098387
WWE   IS MORE FOR ENTERTAINMENT AND ECW IS MORE HARDCORE  \nLOTS OF BLOOD
1114557
WWE because of DX\n\nbridget
343529
WWE. The only thing interesting about TNA is that the ring is a different configuration. Half of the wrestlers on TNA are former WWE wrestlers who couldn't draw a crowd anymore.
715945
I personally think wwe is much the better show and there many reasons why this is.\n1-having 99% of the best wrestlers on their roster.I feel only Christian,Kurt Angle and AJ Styles have it for T.N.A.\n2-WWE owning copyright after copyright to wrestlers names and moves and the actual matches.This results in wrestlers having to change their gimmics and names and end up calling themselves Kip James.Also instead of a over the top battle royal you end up with starting on the floor and trying to get over the ropes into the ring all because wwe owns the battle royal.\n3-TNA copying WWE ,WWE doesnt copy TNA. whats that about the saying immitation is the biggest sign of flattery .\n4- TNA a place for old washed up stars,that couldnt make it or get over in wwe. ex Billy Gunn,Raven,Rhyno,spike dudley,chrisy hemme,the list goes on and on.\n5-Power and money as long as the wwe has this TNA will always be a 1 hour a week show going nowhere very fast.\n6-Jeff Jarret. and some think Tripple H is power mad and wont put over talent.Who would yu rather have as champion.\n7-The x division and the reason for this is simple.This division is the highlight of tna and the likes of aj styles,chris daniels and pety williams make the company what it is.But how long can these and many others keep puting their bodies on the line like they do.Not for much longer. As the bar keeps getting raised there is going to be further to fall and wrestlers will fall.Then without the x division there will be nothing left.