Traveling at 10% of the speed of light, how long would it take to travel a distance of 30 Light years?
470138
As everybody else noted, the theoretical space journey would take 300 years in earth terms or 298.5 years aboard ship.\n\nThis presents you for some challenges in your story-in-progress as you would need:\n\na) a long-lived character or characters like Robert Heinlein's Lazarus Long; or\n\nb) generations of people born and raised on board ship with new generations trained in running a spaceship; or\n\nc) the passengers kept in hibernation while the crew is manned by androids and advanced computers.
426747
The speed of light is a measurement of how fast light travels in a vacuum. The speed of light also known as "c" as in the famous Einstein equation E=mc^2. And its equal to 299,792,458 m/s or in U.S miles per hour is about 670million miles per hour!!!!!!! It would take light coming form the sun only 8 seconds to arrive on earth which is 92million miles away. Now say "WOW!!"
383249
The Hubble Space Telescope can see out to a distance of several billions of light-years. A light-year is the distance that light travels in 1 year. Since light has a speed of 186,000 miles per second (light can travel about 7 times around the entire earth in 1 second!), light travels about 5,865,696,000,000 miles in just one year. You can attach 9 more zeros to the end of this to get 1 billion light-years and another one for 10 billion light-years. The farthest that Hubble has seen so far is about 10-15 billion light-years away. The farthest area looked at is called the Hubble Deep Field.
11066
well first, read my other answer to your question about the speed of sound.  You would probably expect the answer to be the same, and the light to reach the other car, but this is a special circumstance because nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, not even light itself.  when a beam of light is shone ahead of a rapidly moving space vehicle, and is expected to be moving at the speed of light plus the speed of the vehicle, it is still only moving at the speed of light, which is puzzling.  Physicists have defined the speed of light to be the ultimate cutoff point for speed.\n\nAnd also, you wouldn't be able to travel at the speed of light anyway because time would probably stop since it does get slower and slower the faster you go.  Velocity warps time, the faster you go, the slower time moves for you relative to a stationary object.  I've read this, and it is definately true, we had to derive the formula in physics from, and calculate the time, lenghth(which decreases with speed), and mass (which increases with speed) distortion as well.  The effects of this are very negligable unless you are moving at speeds very very close to the speed of light, at least over 90% of the speed of light, and we haven't gotten anywhere close yet.  The denominator of this factor that time, length, and mass are distorted by actually is 1 minus the square root of the speed of light(c) over the speed in which the object is traveling (v), so the reason you can't go faster than the speed of light is because if v was greater than c, then that square root would be greater than one, meaning the denominator would be negative, meaning the factor would be negative, and the light would actually be travelling backwards in time...\n\nIf you find any of this interesting, I highly recommend "The Elegant Universe" by Brian Greene.
418308
The speed of light in a vacuum is exactly 299,792,458 metres per second (or 1,079,252,848.8  km·h-1, which is approximately 186,282.397 miles per second, or 670,616,629.4 miles per hour).
616855
The sun is approx 98 million miles away, light travels 186,282.397 miles per second. So we would know ( and die) about 8.768 minutes later
339050
The speed of light in a vacuum is exactly 299,792,458 metres per second (or 1,079,252,848.8  km·h-1, which is approximately 186,282.397 miles per second, or 670,616,629.4 miles per hour). This value is denoted by the letter c, reputedly from the Latin celeritas, "speed". Note that this speed is a definition, not a measurement, since the fundamental SI unit of distance, the metre, has been defined since 1983 in terms of the speed of light—one metre is the distance light travels in a vacuum in 1/299,792,458 of a second. The speed of light through a transparent medium (that is, not in vacuum) is less than c; the ratio of c to this speed is called the refractive index of the medium.
181040
yes but to get to other universes u must travel out of our universe and then travel to another one but that would take 1,000 years to complete at the speed of light but if you dont belive me look it up on google...or watch the science channel
82335
Sound travels at approximately 720 miles per hour. Light travels at 186,000 miles per second.
1054714
if we travel at the speed of light, it would take approximately 4.2 years to travel to Proxima Centauri.  Obviuosly, we can't reach that speed.  Space Shuttles can reach a speed of 17,500 mph or 7823.2 m/s.  With this speed, it would take 161059.4 yrs
1040094
I remember it being said that if you were to travel at light speed for an hour, the amount of time that would pass on Earth would equate to years.  Indeed, it went further on to say that a baby would have grown into an old person in the amount of time that elapsed.  Taking that into account (let's say 60 years), assuming that the passage of time would be linear, and that there are 8,760 hours in one year, then perhaps some 525,600 years would've passed on Earth.  \n\nHowever, I'm thinking I did something wrong here.
40471
E=mc^2 \nEnergy = mass * (speed of light)^2, c = the speed of light (approx. 186,000 miles per second).
43761
The speed of light in a vacuum is exactly 299,792,458 metres per second (or 1,079,252,848.8 km/h, which is approximately 186,282.397 miles per second, or 670,616,629.4 miles per hour; sometimes roughly 300,000 km per second). This value is denoted by the letter c, reputedly from the Latin celeritas, "speed", and also known as Einstein's constant. Note that this speed is a definition, not a measurement, in that the fundamental SI unit of distance, the metre, is defined in terms of the speed of light: one metre is the distance light travels in a vacuum in 1/299,792,458 of a second. The speed of light through a transparent medium (that is, not in vacuum) is less than c; the ratio of c to this speed is called the refractive index of the medium.
631594
Our goal was to drastically slow down light, which travels through empty space at the universe's ultimate speed limit of nearly 300,000 kilometers a second. We saw the first sign of light pulses slowing down in March 1998. As happens so often in experimental physics--because it can take so many hours to get all the components working together for the first time--this occurred in the wee hours of the morning, at 4 A.M. By July we were down to airplane speed. At that time I had to go to the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen to teach a class. I remember sitting in the plane marveling that I was traveling "faster than light";--that I could beat one of our slow pulses to Denmark by a full hour.
194179
The distance from the earth to the sun is about 93 million miles. The speed of light is about 186,000 miles per second. Dividing shows that it tkes light about 500 seconds to go from the sun to the earth. That's 8 minutes 20 seconds.
598949
Depends on your perspective.  As you travel closer and closer to the speed of light, time for you will seem to be normal, but you will see it speed up for others who are stationary.\n\nIf you are the one who is stationary, time will seem normal to you, but it will slow down for the one traveling.\n\nAn example - your twin has just been chosen to go on an interstellar trip.  Thankfully you're telepathic and can communicate over any distance.  As she speeds up, you will notice that there are longer and longer times between her transmissions to you, even though she says she'd contacting you at the same time every day.  And when she returns to earth 50 years later, you find she's only aged 10 years! (Robert Heinlein wrote a great novel about just this scenario - "Time for the Stars").\n\nScientists have proven this amazing fact in many experiments. They've put an atomic clock on a fast jet and flown it around the world.  When they returned, the clocks had different times than those on the ground.  But not by much - the clocks were between 50 and 270 nanoseconds different than their stationary counterparts - that's 50 billionths of a second.  Not much - but 500 mph is pretty slow compared to the speed of light.\n\nAnother way this is used in everyday life is the GPS satellites.  This navigation system has to take relativistic effects into account in it's transmission signals in order to get the high accuracy it's capable of. Every GPS satellite has an atomic clock aboard.  Because of the speed of the satellites, a ground observer will see them ticking slower than real time, so the signals have to be adjusted.\n\nTo answer your question - if you traveled around the world at 700 mph for a week, you'd be a few thousandths of a second younger than your friends who stayed behind.
1061558
Moving faster than light isn't really the real issue for space travel as traveling AT the speed of light solves all the distance problems(unless you are interested in time travel!). Of course that in itself is a big challenge. If one could demass the vehicle then surely one could achieve the speed of light!!! Afterall photons do travel at this speed.\nBut we would do very well even with speeds like .99999c because time dilation will reduce the time required drastically. Have the science, just need the technology!