Where can I learn the protocol of a judge for a mock trial?
458957
you need to get the judge's internal operating procedures and or your states code or statutes of civil procedure\n\nthe federal judges guidelines are in the federal code of civil procedure\n\nif you want something particular to your state, i would start out with your state's supreme court's website, many of them have these documents online now\n\nfinally, www.findlaw.com has an extensive collection of both federal and state law resources\n\ngood luck
1008707
Here's one with listing of rules.\nGood Luck!
499738
Try the following website for the 12th Judicial Circuit, Bronx County, New York.\n\nhttp://www.nycourts.gov/courts/12jd/civil_filingrules.shtml
911000
Take the pictures with you. Explain to the judge what happened. Don't argue or give any indication that you do other than worship the judge. Many have developed gigantic heads over the years and will give you a contempt of court citation on just a whim.\n\nA lot depends on where you are, and what type of person the judge hates.\n\nNever argue.
790130
judges do it. call the courthouse and ask.
801634
Habeaus Corpus is one option, but it's only really intended as a collateral attack on wrongful imprisonment.\n\nAs to proving you are innocent, that's the trial process. The judge just grants or denies continuances (delays) based on what the attorneys (prosecutor and defense) ask for. The judge cannot pay more attention to the matter, unless one of the attorney's brings a motion before the court.\n\nAsk your new attorney about a Speedy Trial motion.
1164341
simple call the police in the station in the town or city and ask them to pull up your name and say you are his attorney or barrister and ask for any outstanding warrants or charges then ask about the judge thats on the warrants and then contact and offer to surrender to that court on your own so they will be more lianiant with you and do take a lawyer to any hearings or courts as the outcome is more for you with a lawyer as with not
648818
What age are the students?  Here is a mock trial lesson:\n\nhttp://www.press.umich.edu/esl/tm/amerlegal/08587-09.pdf#search='mock%20lawsuits%20for%20students'\n\nWe contacted an attorney in our city to come and help us prepare a mock trial for our students.  She provided pleadings and court materials for the students.
270575
Judges typically are there to ensure that all rules of the court are followed – most importantly, the Rules of Evidence.  Judges can rule on whether certain evidences are admissible (to be presented to the jury), as well as ruling on any motions either side would make.  Judges would also answer any questions from the jurors when they are deliberating.  If a defendant chooses to have a “bench” trial, the judge also serves as the jury (fact finder) as well.  The judge would also give sentences to convicted defendants according to the rules.
765171
I can't recommend anyone, since I live in New Jersey, but I am listing Websites you can browse to find lawyers that might suit you.\nI would begin with writing out a list of questions you want to ask each firm you interview with on the phone:\nWhat is their experience and success rate?\nHow much to they typically get for their clients?\nDo they have experience in your type of case or similar cases?\nWhat do they charge and if it is free, what percentage do they collect fomr the judgment if it is favorable?\nProbably there are other questions>\nI would insist that a senior associate or partner handle your case, if I were you. You don't want to get into the situation, where they are using your case to train new attorneys.
271405
www.clelaw.lib.oh.us/public/misc/Muni_Ct.html\nwww.courtgateway.com/clerkcountycourtfranklinmunicipal.html
27066
Rules from a Book.\nTips from a Tutor.\nExperience from the telecost.\nPractise with your best attention.
1180285
Maybe findforms.com or freelegalforms.net.
833860
I doubt there are transcripts like in a modern-day trial, but you can call the Courthouse and ask.  If they have a transcript or any information available about the trial, it should be a matter of public record and available to the public.  The only exception to that would be if the Judge ordered the information sealed, in which case you would need a Court-order to get the information.
116422
Your question is very vague. Even if you gave ALL the details and we had access to the files in the case, we still couldn't answer it any more than if we were shaking a Magic 8 Ball or reading Tarrot Cards.\n\nThe fact is, there are three people who have the best idea of his chances, the deffense attorney, the prosicuting attorney, and the judge. Your man probably doesn't even know very much himself.\n\nNo matter how good the evidence is, one way or the other, it depends on how it's interpreted by the judge and jury before a judgment can be entered.\n\nHe won't know until the judge hits the gavel with his final judgment.\n\nGood luck.
317148
Debating ideas \n \n\nThe Five-minute Debate Planner (Mk I)\n\nTopic \n\nIssue and justification \n\n\n\nDefinitions and justifications \n\n\n\n\nCase line \n\n\n\n\nMaterial (arguments) \n\n\n\n\n\n\nRebuttal arguments \n\n\nAllocation \n\n\nAnticipated opposition arguments: \n\n\n\n \n\n\nThe "Five-minute Debate Planner" appears above — it is not unique. Use this sheet on some practice topics, and changed the plan to suit yourself.\n\nUse your version of the planning sheet\n\n\nto plan how you will present each debate, and \nto "capture" the other side's plan during the debate so you can analyse it. \nThe terms used in the sheet:\n\nThe topic is obvious. Just write it down as it is stated, and note what side you are on by writing "Aff" or "Neg" at the end of the line.\n\nThe issue is what the topic is really about. This question is very important if the topic is about a metaphor, like "People who live in glass houses should not throw stones". In this example, the issue is not about throwing real stones, or living in a glass house. You must always take time out to identify the issue.\n\nIn the same section, write down your justification for interpreting the issue this way. This shows briefly why you have chosen what you have chosen as the issue.\n\nNext, you come to your definitions. Mostly, these will come from your interpretation of the issue, and must refer to the issue. Sometimes, the definitions will come from what the "person in the street" would believe, or from the context of the topic. (If the topic is "That we should kill all the lawyers", this does not necessarily mean standing all the solicitors against a wall and shooting them, even if this strikes you as a tempting proposition. It helps to know that this was meant literally when Shakespeare wrote the lines for "Dick the Butcher".) Note down the context, if you know it.\n\nNext comes your case line. You need a quick statement of how the debate will go from your side.\n\nThen comes a brief points-form listing of your material, the arguments that your team will put forward.\n\nAs a separate section, note down rebuttal arguments. These are things that you need to remember and plan for, but which you plan to bring out in rebutting the other side's arguments.\n\nNext comes your allocation for the first two speakers. This divides up the caseline into a neat and logical division that gives each speaker a reasonable amount of material to work with.\n\nFinally, note down what you expect the other side to argue. Watch out: there may be more than one way of arguing either side of a case!!\n\nSample topics\n\nThese topics are roughly graded in terms of difficulty. In training, you will sometimes be required to take on a task which is easier or harder than your ability and age. Note that even the hardest topic can be debated at a simple level, and a very simple topic can be debated brilliantly!\n\nEasy\n\nThat homework should be banned.\n\nThat school uniforms are good for us.\n\nThat television is too violent.\n\nThat television does more harm than good.\n\nThat terrorism can be justified.\n\nThat the earth can look after itself.\n\nThat the IOC made the wrong decision for Sydney.\n\nThat a woman's place is in the home.\n\nThat Australia is a nation of bigots.\n\nThat the car is a luxury we can do without.\n\nThat all our woes have come from science.\n\nThat people who live in glass houses should not throw stones.\n\n \n\nJunior\n\nThat the Olympics are a five-ring circus.\n\nThat spectator sports are a waste of time.\n\nThat organised team sport is legalised violence.\n\nThat we are Uncle Sam's nephews and nieces.\n\nThat the law is an ass.\n\nThat education is the key to success.\n\nThat education starts after school.\n\nThat there is strength in diversity.\n\nThat peace depends on fear.\n\nThat we should try, try, try again.\n\nThat we should be vegetarians.\n\nThat we should
105843
depends on your judge