Have u ever heard about the scratch on the moon seen by Nill  Armstorng when he visited the moon.?
465475
Oh; I'm sure that he surely would have done that, then he made a white rabbit appear out of his turban.\n\nIgnorant Muslims are as bad as ignorant Christians and ignorant Jews (not to mention ignorant atheists)... Please God give these people some brains.
889167
Not, it is a derivative of moon land, in actual fact no one can reach the moon. NASA reach moon, it was a plant but not a moon. Even now they sent two sat's to sun....are you believe they manage to reach the sun.\n\n1) Because, your teacher teach you that there is a person reach the moon from NASA. \n\n2) But my grand mother say that there is her grandma sit down in the moon, prepare dinner for me. \n\nabove two item which one is true?....you need marks to pass the exam. So you begin to believe the teacher....on the other hand my grandma want's me to take a dinner with full happiness. that she would like to say my dinner from the moon. \n\nfrom the above two information, which you choose to predict to your teach.\n\nMy conclusion is that every thing can be done by human. why you want to predict the teacher that the NASA actually land on the moon. so don't think too much to predict the teacher....try to follow their instruction...once you reach as a scientist. Then you think toomuch like me......\n\nYoung scientist.
400722
No.  I saw this video about the moon landing, and how it was done.  The video showed how the lighting was all wrong, and a picture a satellite took of a "part of the moon" here on earth.  I could go on, but I am too tired.
795625
Yes, there is quite a bit of equipment on the moon that was left behind during the six moon landings.  This inclues the "moon car", the descent stages of the Lunar Modules, and numerous experiments.\n\n And, there are several crash sites where the Saturn IV-B boosters were crashed intentionally onto the moon in order to produce seismic vibrations for the seismometers left on the moon by the astronauts.\n\nThe problem is that none of the equipment is large enough to be seen by telescopes.  At that distance, even the Hubble Space Telescope cannot resolve objects less that three or four meters in size.  Nothing we've left behind is large enough.\n\nP.S.  I think "spacejohn77" was referring to the article linked below.
371858
I am a big project Apollo fan and have done a lot of reading into this over the years (including the conspiracies). Armstrong has never talked openly about the moonlandings in public and most of what is reported from him has been hearsay. One thing I did read is that he was meant to say 'That's one small step for A man, one giant....'. I read also that the lunar ladder to the surface had to be modified after the landing as it was too short.
517455
Here men from the planet Earth first set foot upon the Moon July 1969, A.D. We came in peace for all mankind."\n\nI knew this already but there is proof below, how do i know it? Independents day the movie lol! Right at the begining, if i remember correctly you cannot see it all so i went to find out :-P sad huh!
50505
There's the Man *in* the Moon, but not the Moon *in* the Earth.  So far, there is only one moon orbiting the Earth and its name is ... "Moon".
423837
Are you talking about the god Apollo, or the space mission that put man on the moon?
996857
Based on the information out there, I now believe that they never went  to the moon. There is no wind on the moon, yet the flag blows in the background. The angles of lighting do not match the way they are supposed to, unless lighting was set up...and an extensive amount. The temperatre that the films would have been subjected to, would have destroyed the pictures. And for the picture of the footprint on the moon, there would have had to have been moisture to create such a mark. If you take completey dry sand and try to make a castle out of it, what happens? It crumbles...any child who has been to the beach knows that you need a little water. so, anyone can believe what they want, but im going on facts :)\n\nps...dont mind my spelling
388081
Well, i read an autobiography of Buzz Aldrin's of his walk to the moon (in a literature textbook), and it sounded pretty real. Why would Buzz Aldrin lie about something like that?
832952
1) Twelve 12 American astronauts have walked on the moon.\n\nApollo 11: Neil Armstrong & Buzz Aldrin\nApollo 12: Pete Conrad & Alan Bean\nApollo 13: << failed to land on the moon >>\nApollo 14: Alan Shepard & Edgar (Ed) Mitchell\nApollo 15: David Scott & James Irwin\nApollo 16: John Young & Charles Duke\nApollo 17: Eugene (Gene) Cernan & Harrison Schmidt\n\n\n2) What about the Van Allen radiation belts?  Wouldn't it have killed the astronauts?\n\nThe existence of the Van Allen radiation belts postulated in the 1940s by Nicholas Christofilos.  Their existence was confirmed in *1958* by the Explorer I satellite launched by the USA. \n\nThe radiation in the Van Allen radiation belts is not particularly strong.  You would have to hang out there for a week or so in order to get radiation sickness.  And, because the radiation is not particularly strong, a few millimeters of metal is all that is required for protection.  "An object satellite shielded by 3 mm of aluminum will receive about 2500 rem (25 Sv) per *year*."\n\n"In practice, Apollo astronauts who travelled to the moon spent very little time in the belts and received a harmless dose. [6]. Nevertheless NASA deliberately timed Apollo launches, and used lunar transfer orbits that only skirted the edge of the belt over the equator to minimise the radiation."  When the astronauts returned to Earth, their dosimeters showed that they had received about as much radiation as a couple of medical X-rays.\n\n\n3) Why haven't we been back?  \n\na) The "moon race" was an extension of the cold war. It was mostly about national prestige. We got there first and achieved our primary objective. There was some good science: surveys, measurements, sample collection. But it was mostly about being there first. Once we achieved our primary objective, there was no political will to go back. There still isn't.  Perhaps, if we discover He3 or something else valuable, there will be.\n\nb) I used to travel to Crested Butte, Colorado every year to ski. Because I don't go anymore, does it mean that I never went?\n\n\n4) The U.S. government scammed everyone?  \n\nIn 1972, there was a politically motivated burglary of a hotel room in the Watergate Hotel in Washington, D.C. There were only about six or eight people who knew about it. However, those people, including Richard M. Nixon, the President of the United States, failed to keep that burglary a secret. It exploded into a scandal that drove the President and a number of others from office.\n\nIf six or eight people couldn't keep a hotel room burglary a secret, then how could literally thousands of people could have kept their mouths shut about six faked moon landings? Not just one moon landing, but six of them!\n\n\n5) What about the USSR?  \n\nEven if NASA and other government agencies could have faked the six moon landings well enough to fool the general public, they could NOT have fooled the space agency or military intelligence types in the USSR. The Soviets were just dying to beat us. If the landings were faked, the Soviets would have re-engineered their N-1 booster and landed on the moon just to prove what liars Americans are. Why didn't they? Because the landings were real and the Soviets knew it.\n\n\n6) Why does the flag shake?  Where are the stars?\n\nTake a look at the first two websites listed below.  They deal well with all of the technical questions.\n\n\n7) Finally, please tell us what you would accept as definitive evidence that the six moon landings were real. Is there anything?
912266
Summary \nThe speaker proclaims that he has been the victim of "strange fits of passion"; he says that he will describe one of these fits, but only if he can speak it "in the Lover's ear alone." Lucy, the girl he loved, was beautiful--"fresh as a rose in June"--and he traveled to her cottage one night beneath the moon. He stared at the moon as his horse neared the paths to Lucy's cottage. As they reached the orchard, the moon had begun to sink, nearing the point at which it would appear to the speaker to touch Lucy's house in the distance. As the horse plodded on, the speaker continued to stare at the moon. All at once, it dropped "behind the cottage roof." Suddenly, the speaker was overcome with a strange and passionate thought, and cried out to himself: "O mercy! If Lucy should be dead!" \n\n\n\nThere's more info on the site.
444891
Tomorrow, 4/13/06.  At least according to my calendar.  We cannot see the moon here as we have had rain for about six weeks straight.  I would love to see it!!
184575
Yes, he did.  If you have a good enough telescope, you can see the sites of all the Apollo moon landings.
751616
I am very effected by the fool moon, however as a Cancer it is my ruling planet.  I make sure to saty home that night and have a few drinks.  I always make a very special meal and just enjoy watching the moon pass over my house!
15143
I'm not sure. I believe it is real though. Wish I had some solid proof to back it up. Perhaps we wont know for sure untill civilians are able to land freely on the moon and see for themselves. Until that happens fully, we just have to rely on faith.
774239
"You know nothing of the crunch!"\n\n"One time, I saw a man looking at me, yes, with his eyes. And then, he, he picked up a tube. And he looked, in the tube, and he made the moon big, inside the tube. The moon big inside a tube!"\n\n"The wind is my only friend"\n\n"I'm gonna creep inside you like a warm kitten!"