do tolorance requirments infringe on peoples rights?
468731
Free speech is a right. It has limits. You cannot threaten people. But if you believe they are wrong or sinning, they do not have a right to not be offended, as you are neither threatening them or harming them in any way.\n\nYou cannot punish peoples' thoughts and still be a free nation. \n\nYou have no right to deny others' speech merely because you don't like it. It is not harassment. You are equally free to ignore them or refute them. But if you curtail their rights by bringing government force against them, we've all lost.\n\nThat is a path that leads to oppression of all people.
97189
There is authority in the Bill of Rights to protect you from forced consent to certain things (search and seizure, quartering troops, etc).  But anything else is up for argument.
320346
"The new constitution contains human rights provisions, although their practical effect had not come fully into play since most provisions depended on implementing still-ongoing legislative and institutional changes."\n\nFor a full breakdown, see here:  http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/060322/2006032221.html
146773
There is no universal definition of Human Rights. There should be but due to dictatorships in different countries and war etc some countries don't even care about human rights. As sad as this is it is unfortunately true.
424695
No, we should not ignore this. I do believe that everyone has a right to come to this country to make a better life for themselves, but I believe that you should have to earn this right. Living with the rights that we do have is a privilege.
1115400
None.\n\nIf somebody says something insulting then it is a person's choice to let that upset them or not.\n\nIf somebody has a story they can PROVE then they should have the right to tell it.
451596
What makes you think you have a right to anything? \n\nSuggest reading Rights in the wikipedia.\n\n"There are two fundamental controversies surrounding the notion of rights: First, there is the question of the basis for rights (on what basis can rights be said to exist). Second, there is the question of the content of rights (what the rights of a person actually are)."\n\nWhat is a right?\n"At its most fundamental, a right is a claim, on other persons, that is acknowledged and perhaps reciprocated among the principals associated with that claim." \n \nWho granted  you these rights?
366028
What sort of rights. I'm looking for a case to take on right now. Is there money involved?
247680
you need to set other people to have more rights
490105
This right is protected by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. \n\n"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
191922
Our constitution forbids your rights to infringe on others rights.  We all have a right to persue Happiness here in the Good Ole USA.  If you take your life, although you may not agree,  Many will suffer great pain.  It is a permanent solution to a temporary problem and it never solves the problem only spreads it.\n\nEnjoy Life, Today , Tomorrow, and Beyond
321041
yes you can!!\nhuman rights act in the uk relates to fairness of trial.\njudges are not protected my such immunity, as they doing their job wrong.
82101
I guess you could make the argument that the way people dress is a form of expression (be it religious or otherwise) and thus requiring people to dress a certain way or discriminating against those who dont might be in violation of the first ammendment.
1115591
Nobody can have absolute rights and freedoms even in the most democratic society.  That's because people's rights and freedoms often conflict with each other, and you need to have respect for everyone's rights and freedoms equally.\n\nIf you are hungry and you have a right to eat, this doesn't mean that you can rob a food store and eat all you want because such action would violate another person's right to have private property.  And it's like that with all rights and freedoms.  \n\nYour rights and freedoms are not restricted as long as you don't interfere with other people's rights and freedoms.  But when there is a conflict between rights and freedoms of two or more individuals, then you need laws which specify what you can and cannot do.
45087
People want their rights.
105967
not without a warrant, 4th ammendment:\n\nThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
1058941
Of course, first amendment rights.\nI Corinthians 13;8a, Love never fails!!!!!