In Islam why woman can not utter Talaq Talaq Talaq ( Divorced)like man where are equal rights for them?
457907
i dont know about you insulting muslims, or any religion.\nin islam a woman has the right to divorce her husband, or file a divorce law suit for specific reason she might want to end the marriage for.\nread about islam before you insult any part of it.\nits amazing really that an ignorant person claims the right to discuss any topic.
493592
Even if Allah is male ,Muslim men should wear burqas.They should be ashamed of themselves of what they hav done to their womens.Four marriage allowed and a women is locked up in home ,thats absurd and uncivilised.\n\nIslam need to modernise
569196
First of all DNA , you tell me can all women afford to pay for DNA ? in all countrys ? of course not.\n\nWomen emtionally cannot handel 4 men nor physically, this would mean she has to have sex atleast 4 times a day everyday with each man, lets say they al like sex twice a day then thats 8 times a day, and the womans body cannot stand this, read the medical reports of prostitutes and thier wrecked cervix's\n\nWhen is Polygamy allowed in Islam? \n\nThe sections of this article are: \n\n- When is polygamy allowed in Islam? \n- What was the purpose of Noble Verse 4:3? \n   - The way I read Noble Verse 4:3. \n- Why didn't Allah Almighty directly prohibit polygamy? \n- Why then did Prophet Muhammad practice polygamy? \n- Can anyone be absolutely fair? \n- Too much illiterate and starving kids damage the society and Islam. \n- What if the person is rich and can afford polygamy? \n- Conclusion. \n\n\nMarriage from multiple women in Islam might not be allowed for those who might result in damaging the society with their marriage by bringing more illiterate, poor, and in many cases starving children to the society.\n\nLet us look at Noble Verse 4:3 "If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice." Notice how Allah Almighty orders men to be either fair to their wives or never marry more than one wife.\n\nLet us look at Noble Verse 4:129 "Ye are never able to be fair and just as between women, even if it is your ardent desire: But turn not away (from a woman) altogether, so as to leave her (as it were) hanging (in the air). If ye come to a friendly understanding, and practise self-restraint, God is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful."  Here we clearly see that Allah Almighty tells men that they will never be fair to their wives.  \n\nLet us see why then Allah Almighty temporarily ordered polygamy but yet very highly discouraged it, and why I personally believe from the Noble Quran that polygamy should not be allowed today to most Muslim men in the Muslim world.\n\n \n\nWhat was the purpose of the Noble Verse 4:3? \n\nNoble Verse 4:3 was revealed to Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him in Madina after he migrated to it from Mecca and established an Islamic state there right after the battle of Uhud in which the Muslims not only had lost badly against the Pagans, but also suffered a dramatic decrease in the number of Muslim men.  The Muslim men before that battle were approximately 700.  They became only 400 after the battle.  This loss had left so many Muslim women (1) Widows, and (2) Not able to get married if they were single. \n\nTo make matters even worse, the Muslims had faced yet another battle against the Pagans in Mecca and its neighboring tribes who wanted to attack the Muslims in Madina to finish off Islam once and for all, and by the Jews and the Christians in Madina who betrayed the Muslims in the "battle of Trench" after signing a defense treaty with Muhammad peace be upon him against the Pagans.  \n\nAll praise due to Allah Almighty.  With Allah's Will and Mercy, the Muslims had miraculously won the battle against the Pagans of Mecca and drove them back to where they came from, and then attacked the Jews and the Christians who betrayed the defense treaty and kicked those hypocrites out of Madina forever! \n\nThese continuous battles against the Muslims were very costly in terms of Muslim men's lives.  The women had to be taken care of one way or another.  For this reason, Allah Almighty had revealed the Noble Verse 4:3 to Muhammad peace be upon him to solve the social problems that the Muslims were facing.  That is why at the very beginning of the Noble Verse 4:3 we see Allah Almighty setting a conditional clause for Orphans
198361
I will explain some from Saudi Arabia which is the center of the muslim world and thought to be very muslim like.\n\n1. Women can't drive even if they have International driver license.\n2. Women can't go outside alone even if they need a prescribed medicine and their life is in danger.\n3. Women have to share their husbands with other wives and kaneezes (slave girls).\n4. Women have half the rights of a man if their father or husband dies (heredity rights).\n5. women have half the vote meaning if a man sees new moon of Ramadan or Eid equals if 2 women sees it and witness.\n6. Women have to wear a veil on their face even if that hinders the site and they fall in a ditch or manhole (its okay).\n7. If they don't do any of the above they are beaten by Religious police (shurta) with a wooden stick like animals.\n\nThese are some of the rights women have.
802252
India is a secular state with a constitutional system where family laws are also protected. That way, the Islamic family laws are protected by the constitution though in its Directive priciples it expects the Union government to introduce a common civil code.\n\n'Darul Qaza' in Islamic law is referred to the Islamic Courts. But 'Darul Qaza' has no authority or force to get their decisions implemented through any enforcing agency. Hence, 'Darul Qaza' can not be termed as either in conflict with or parallel to the Indian judicial system.
516441
I love the blunt way you put it.\nYou call a spade a spade. \nThe Muslim law allows men to “marry” a woman and divorce her an hour later after they have screwed her. This is law is used all the times in Muslim countries to cover up prostitution. For example young girls from Iran, or India, “marry” rich Saudis for just one night.
50945
In most Asian countries a woman is still deemed as a man's property. She is taught that not covering up is a sign of shame, and of great taboos within the society (meaning not being a virgin, or commiting adultery, or being a loose woman) which would get tongues wagging and it would just all turn back against her.\nIt is a largely patriachal society where they are taught from young to be subserviant, submissive and under the mercy and law of a man's judgement and rule. \n\nThis is further emphasized in their religion where a man is the head of the family, makes all the decisions and his word is law, due to his supremacy under the eyes of their God. (Set in stone by the ruling that a man and a woman are equal, but men has a degree over them, that being the fact that they make the decisions.)\n\nAs a result, the whole society is based upon this ruling of divine law because it is a part of their religion, which is also one that governs their daily lives.\nThis has become such a norm that even if a woman wants to be independant, go out unveiled and is a feminist, she will be under the law of her husband or father, who is by law the head of the household and can demand her obedience legally.\n\nIn the more tribal or rural areas, her life depends on her ability to conform. If a woman doesn't wear a veil she is seen as a 'dishonour' to her family - women are the honour of the family and it is the man's duty to uphold it, supposedly - even the smallest spark of a rumour of her being seen with a man would have her killed.\nAn example is a report on the news a few days ago about a Pakistani man who slit the throats of his 3 daughters, one 16, the other 6 and 4. Reason was she was accused of adultery (with no proof or evidence) by her husband and the father felt "dishonoured", slit her throat, and those of her sisters because they "might follow the example of their elder sister in the future".\nThe irony is that she had wanted a divorce from her husband who was forcing her to work in a factory, when in their religion a woman is not obligated to work - she is encouraged to stay at home and assume a childbearing and childrearing role, as well as the duty of upkeeping the household and it's affairs.\n\nSuch cowardice is not unknown in these areas, where women live under a veil of subserviant fear and forced obedience, where their lives depend upon making sure no one can find any excuse to accuse her of something.\nIn the more educated areas, a woman does so because she is taught as such, ordered by her husband or father to veil herself, or she herself have chosen to do so.
697030
i didnt get ur question.im a muslim women.contact me at my email for any any any anything u ever have to say\n\nfreepurelol@yahoo.com
1056262
I do agree with you on this point.  However, this is not grounds to give women special rights.  For instance:  I have seen records of court cases in which the father is a decent man but the mother is on drugs and all the problems that come with it.  The father gets a divorce because the mother neglects the kids and she still gets custody on the grounds that "Children need their mother."  \n\nI agree with you, but equal rights does not mean special rights.
57831
because if the father of their kids were non muslim it is most likely that they become non muslim too ... so here we just lost a family of Islam to a non muslim ones\n\n\nIslam considers the husband head-of-the-family and therefore requires that a Muslim woman cannot marry a non-Muslim because she will be under the authority of a non-muslim husband. He may\nprevent her from carrying out her religious obligations by either pressuring her or physically abusing her. But it is not the sole reason for imposing the restriction. The situation is\nconsidered very damaging for the woman to practise Islam afterwards and even worse for the kids in such marriages.  There are NO conditions mentioned under which a Muslim woman IS allowed to get married or remain married to a non-Muslim husband\nafter she has accepted Islam. Therefore, even if she has freedom to practice Islam after marriage, she is NOT allowed to enter into an inter-faith marriage.
495542
"Woman".  Oman is a country, and "man" is theoretically the opposite of "woman".
479084
This is the Sura i.e. chapter called Nisa meaning women. In this sura rights and duty of women is described in brief. I know after reading this sura you many have question,\n\nWhy does Islam degrade women by keeping them behind the veil?\n\nThe status of women in Islam is often the target of attacks in the secular media. The ‘hijaab’ or the Islamic dress is cited by many as an example of the ‘subjugation’ of women under Islamic law. Before we analyze the reasoning behind the religiously mandated ‘hijaab’, let us first study the status of women in societies before the advent of Islam\n\n\n1.   In the past women were degraded and used as objects of lust\n\n\nThe following examples from history amply illustrate the fact that the status of women in earlier civilizations was very low to the extent that they were denied basic human dignity:\n\n\n\n\nBabylonian Civilization:\nThe women were degraded and were denied all rights under the Babylonian law. If a man murdered a woman, instead of him being punished, his wife was put to death.\n\nGreek Civilization: \nGreek Civilization is considered the most glorious of all ancient civilizations. Under this very ‘glorious’ system, women were deprived of all rights and were looked down upon. In Greek mythology, an ‘imaginary woman’ called ‘Pandora’ is the root cause of misfortune of human beings. The Greeks considered women to be subhuman and inferior to men. Though chastity of women was precious, and women were held in high esteem, the Greeks were later overwhelmed by ego and sexual perversions. Prostitution became a regular practice amongst all classes of Greek society.\n\nRoman Civilization:\nWhen Roman Civilization was at the zenith of its ‘glory’, a man even had the right to take the life of his wife. Prostitution and nudity were common amongst the Romans.\n\nEgyptian Civilization:\nThe Egyptian considered women evil and as a sign of a devil.\n\nPre-Islamic Arabia:\nBefore Islam spread in Arabia, the Arabs looked down upon women and very often when a female child was born, she was buried alive.\n\n\n2.   Islam uplifted women and gave them equality and expects them to maintain their status.\n\n\nIslam uplifted the status of women and granted them their just rights 1400 years ago. Islam expects women to maintain their status.\n\n\nHijaab for men\n\nPeople usually only discuss ‘hijaab’ in the context of women. However, in the Glorious Qur’an, Allah (swt) first mentions ‘hijaab’ for men before ‘hijaab’ for the women. The Qur’an mentions in Surah Noor:\n\n"Say to the believing men that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty: that will make for greater purity for them: and Allah is well acquainted with all that they do."\n[Al-Qur’an 24:30]\n\nThe moment a man looks at a woman and if any brazen or unashamed thought comes to his mind, he should lower his gaze.\n\nHijaab for women.\n\nThe next verse of Surah Noor, says:\n\n" And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what (must ordinarily) appear thereof; that they should draw veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons..."\n[Al-Qur’an 24:31]\n\n\n3.   Six criteria for Hijaab.\n\n\nAccording to Qur’an and Sunnah there are basically six criteria for observing hijaab:\n\nExtent:\n\nThe first criterion is the extent of the body that should be covered. This is different for men and women. The extent of covering obligatory on the male is to cover the body at least from the navel to the knees. For women, the extent of covering obligatory is to cover the complete body except the face and the hands upto the wrist. If they wish to, they can cover even these parts of the body. Some scholars of Islam insist that the face and the hands are part of the obligatory extent of ‘hijaab
944119
There is a whole surah named Women\n\n\nThe quran talks about women and breastfeeding for two years\n\nIt mentions the same amount of rewards and punishments for both men and women\n\nIt says that women get to keep what they earn\n\nWomen have a right to their own in heritance\n\nthe right to divorce\n\nIslam gives women the right to run for political office\n\nThe right to be supported by her husband\n\nThe right to get Dowery \n\nThe right to write her own marriage contract\n\nThe right to select her husband of choosing\n\nThe right ot to pray if she has her period or is sick\n\nThe right to keep whatever she earns from work, inheritance or otherwise\n\nThe right over her children\n\nThe right to vote for officers running for goverment\n\nThe  right to attain the same education as men\n\nthe right to be treated with dignity and kindness by her husband and all members of her family\n\nShould I go on sweethert?\n\nWe could be here all night....
988010
It does happen - the danger is very real in a misogynistic 'cultures' I do not know enough about Islam to know that this is why women have less rights in such countries - perhaps in certain offshoot groups.....  If the culture/religion says that women have less rights then the warning signs are there. We never believe that it could happen to us/ to our marriage. Life has a way of dumping you on your head though.  Even a different country and the same religion is dangerous. I no longer beleive that you should take such risks - too many mums and kids going through this - There is an organization called child-find for just such things.
1049890
FIRST OF ALL, LET ME CLARIFY THE BIGGEST MISCONCEPTION MADE BY CRITICS OF ISLAM. \nwhat women get in the paradise it exactly the same as men. in arabic when you speak to a group of people containing men and women you speak to them using the masculine verbs. however, in the Quran many times Allah says femals or males many times (but not always) to make it clear that the talk is not toward men only but also to women.\nalso, the paradise contains whatever one desires. so, it's obvious that if women desires men then they can have it.\n\n\nSurah 3:195\n\nSo their Lord accepted their prayer: That I will not waste the work of a worker among you, whether male or female...\n\nSurah 4:194\n\nAnd whoever does good deeds whether male or female and he (or she) is a believer -- these shall enter the garden, and they shall not be dealt with a jot unjustly.\n\n \nSurah 36:56\n\nThey and their wives shall be in shades, reclining on raised couches\n\nSurah 39:34\n\nThey will have with their Lord whatever they desire; that is the reward of those who good.\n\nSurah 43:70\n\nEnter the garden, you and your wives; you shall be made happy.\n\n\n=================\nthe hoors (male and females) have been created by God. and when the people who deserve to go to paradise, will be made as much beautiful as hoors. Allah has made everything in pairs. \n\nThey will say to each other, Glory be to God, who has made us to live together. They are  spouses.  that does not mean that paradise will have 72 times more woman than men. because hoors are made for both man and woman. \n\nHOPE THIS ANSWERS\n\nONLY ALLAH KNOWS BEST\n\nedit >>>>>>>>>>>>>\nMANY christians have problem with this issue, i ask why? Whats wrong with having sex with pure spouses which God has made legal and good. if you are against sex, then stop having it in this world as well. yesterday my christian friend told me that Christian paradise does not have any sex. SO SAD!
275613
Every one in this world has the right to live... discrimination according to color, religin, gender ..etc led to the most conflicts in this world...\nAnd about Islam... you have to read the fair books written about this religin so as to get the right information before judging muslims as beings have to disappeared!!!!
316647
HERE IS A SURVERY FROM FREEDOM HOUSE THAT SHOULD ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS.....\n\n\nMorocco is a country undergoing positive changes towards economic and political liberalization in particular more recently under the leadership of King Mohammad VI who ascended to the throne in 1999. Morocco is a traditional, hereditary monarchy with a limited parliamentary system. NGOs advocating on behalf of women’s rights are generally free to organize, plan conferences, seminars...\n\nNondiscrimination and Access to Justice: \n\nMorocco’s legal system is based on the Maliki School of jurisprudence under Islamic law and the civil law systems of both France and Spain. According to the constitution, women are afforded equal political rights as men however there is no statement of equal civil rights. There are measures taken to advance the status of Moroccan women such as the creation of a ministry responsible just for reviewing the status of women. For Muslim citizens, family courts adjudicate over issues of marriage, divorce, inheritance, child custody, etc. which are partial to men’s rights. In addition, Moroccan women can neither pass on citizenship to foreign-born husbands nor to the children of their foreign-born husbands except under special circumstances. New laws enacted have generally promoted the interests of women under the penal code. Cases of adultery, abuse, violence and are punishable equally for men and women but young women are prosecuted for pregnancy out of wedlock, Witness/testimony of a woman is still not equal to that of a man and while Morocco passed CEDAW, it did adopt reservations to certain articles.\n\nAutonomy, Security and Freedom of the Person: \n\nWhile the majority of people in Morocco are Muslim, there are small Christian and Jewish minorities who are free to practice their religions. Muslims who choose to convert other religions encounter social ostracism and it is unlawful for a Muslim woman to marry a non-Muslim husband. Laws preventing women from traveling independently or obtaining a passport have been repealed however in practice government officials may still request young girls and married women to produce consent from fathers or husbands.\n\nA progressive step towards gender equality within the family was an amendment to the CSP stating that women and men shared joint responsibility over the family and family matters with rights and duties of both spouses without discrimination; raising the marriage age for girls from 15 to 18 years is another example of policies adopted to gradually improve the status of women. Women are now offered the option of consensual divorce and divorce due to irreconcilable differences.\n\nThey are still at a disadvantage in custody cases and the trafficking of young women whether Moroccan or African is a serious problem for the country. Underage employment remains a common element of Moroccan society where young girls between the ages of 10 to 12 are hired as domestic servants although the legal employment age was raised from 12 to 15 in 2002.\n\nWomen continue to suffer from violence and harassment within the family and in public and better measures should be taken to prosecute such offences.\n\nEconomic Rights and Equal Opportunity: \n\nDiscrimination against women in the Moroccan economy is a factor holding back gender equality. A lack of access to equal economic rights is generally more common amongst the rural population than the urbanized segments of society due to lack of literacy and knowledge about rights, however apply to all women when it comes to inheritance laws which still distribute property according to Islamic law. Moroccan women are legally entitled to freely and independently dispose of the incomes they generate and property inherited. Women-owned businesses represent a tiny fraction of female labor participation; those in business tend to rely on personal funds or family capital to start-up and are unwilling or uninformed about access to credit resource