will russia nuke america if united states nukes iran and once again find no WMD's again?
457211
Okay, no.  It would make no sense at all for either of those events to happen.
220816
It is a very realistic and good question my dear friend...\n\nMy answer (opinion) will be "Yes".\nBut the fate of U.S.A will be more grieve than Russia.Because as you know lot's of enemy of U.S waiting for a weak point.Lot's of promise of revenge,lot's of hatred and enemy...U.S have to be careful...\n\nRussian system and culture is very different than U.S.A.I have been in Moscow.It is a lovely city...You have to see people,metro stations,museums and buildings...\nIf they don't want to talk no body can talk them.If they want to kill you.They kill you :) They have no details.\nIf they want to do sometihng.They do it.No lie,no acting.That's very simple.\n\nU.S.A will finish itself...
318311
yes he will have them, and yes he may misuse it by attacking other countries, and no the usa cant attack iran cuz if the us did it will turn the world to hell
392943
hope full it want come to that, however the only way to insure that Iran's nuclear capability it completely erased is to use a small tactual nuke. it would be kinda a bunker buster and while it would re lase radiation it wouldnt be a huge amount.
374326
Under Bush anything is a possibility.\nProbably even nuking them.\nFrom Bush's track record, we can see that he cares less for humn lives that are non-American.\nHe would certainly try to nuke them if the need arises.\nPakistan has no reason to nuke Iran. Wrong guess.\nthis might brighten up some of your participants....read on:-\n\nDecember 28, 2005  \nNuking Iran With\nthe UN's Blessing \nOnly the American people can stop it  \nby Jorge Hirsch \nIn the "global war on terror," Iran is the next target, having been designated by the U.S. State Department [.pdf] as "the most active state sponsor of terrorism" in the world. The United Nations has given its blessing, and the U.S. will fill in the blanks. \n\nBefore we analyze this, however, let us ask ourselves: why not Florida instead? In fact, Florida should be way ahead on the list. Family considerations should not play a role in U.S. policy decisions. \n\nLet's compare the cases. For Florida: \n\n\nAt least 15 of the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers had Florida connections. \nThirteen of the 19 were in Florida before Sept.11. \nEight of the hijackers took flying lessons in Venice, Fla. \nFive of the hijackers trained in Florida gyms. \nTwo of the hijackers got drunk in a Hollywood, Fla. bar a few days before the attack. \nInstead, the connections between 9/11 and Iran are much more tenuous, according to the 9/11 Commission: \n\n\n"Senior al-Qaeda operatives and trainers traveled to Iran to receive training in explosives" in 1993. \n"Iran facilitated the transit of al-Qaeda members into and out of Afghanistan before 9/11, and some of these were future 9/11 hijackers." \n"We have found no evidence that Iran or Hezbollah was aware of the planning for what later became the 9/11 attack." \nThe 9/11 hijackers used planes, not explosives. So I very much hope that the Pentagon is revising its Nuclear Strike Plan. A precision-guided missile with a nuclear warhead – or a low-yield nuclear gravity bomb – should be effective in vaporizing both aboveground and underground facilities of Huffman Aviation School in Venice, Fla., with minimal collateral damage. \n\nThe fact is, terrorists do not need "state sponsors" to do their job. The 9/11 hijackers lived in the U.S., rented apartments, opened bank accounts, got drivers licenses, rented cars, took English lessons, had jobs, joined gyms, learned the needed flying skills, bought their box-cutter knives, and blew themselves up in the good old United States. And so will the next terrorists who strike us. \n\nFurthermore, some of the 9/11 hijackers lived and studied in Hamburg, Germany. And they met in Madrid. So are Hamburg and Madrid next on the strike list? \n\nDoes anybody really believe that the "training camps" in Afghanistan played any significant role in 9/11? Can somebody please explain what exactly the 9/11 hijackers learned at those training camps that they couldn't learn elsewhere? \n\nDoes anybody really believe that the purported meeting, which in fact never took place, of Mohamed Atta and an Iraqi intelligence officer in Prague would have played a significant role even if it had taken place? \n\nYet we are embarked in a "global war of terror" in response to the 9/11 attacks that has led to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and is about to lead to a U.S. nuclear attack against Iran. \n\nBecause make no mistake, an aerial attack on Iran that will include low-yield nuclear bombs is the next step in the "global war on terror," unless something extraordinary happens to derail it. \n\nThe "Legal" Framework \n\nThe United States invaded Iraq under the pretext of enforcing UN Security Council resolution (UNSCR) 1441. Bush stated in his address to the nation on March 17, 2003, \n\n"On November 8th, the Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 1441, finding Iraq in material breach of its obligati
390549
The UN will probably not vote for an attack on Iran.  Russia is making money off of Iran, and Russia is broke so they need the money.  So, Russia is on the Security Council of the UN and has veto power.  We'll talk to them, impose some sanctions that Russia and others will skirt around, threaten them, etc.  I think that we'll bomb certain facilities if we think they're getting close.  One good thing is that France is totally against Iran having nukes.  That makes a coalition easier to form, since the French can be active whiners.\n\nHowever, Russia may get with the program if we can show proof Iran is close.  The superpowers know that it would be a BAD thing for little countries to get The Bomb.\n\nBTW, the reason Iran has such a creep for president is because the moderates boycotted the last election in protest of a failure to achieve more democratic change.  They'll probably vote next time, so they'll get a cooler president.
842497
If they are stupid enough to fire a nuke I think all nations with nukes should respond in kind. A few dozen big mushroom clouds coming from all the major powers would have a startling effect on all the countries who want to have a nuke.  Imagine it. One nuke from every country that has the capability to hit Iran. That would be like a huge "WHO IS NEXT" sign for the world to see.
1151008
Will america ever learn.It's not her decision to determine who can and can't have missiles.Still go on beating your drum with your bellicose attitude,as normal You can paint whatever picture you wish. The fact remains you are the only country to use atomic weapons or missiles in anger
675970
I hope not.. it would be a big mistake if they attacked Iran
588767
We have more WMD's than you, so if you try to defy us, you go BOOM. \n\nThat sounds stupid because of the way I phrased it, but it's true. We own the world with fear (which is known as TERRORISM). Russia has almost as many WMD's as we do though, so we're unable to push them around. Same with North Korea, since they have an alliance with North Korea. Thus, situations such as the 'Cold War' (I'm sure you've heard of it) arise.\n\nBut that doesn't stop the foreign policy makers in the US. Ohhhh no...the threat of nuclear holocaust never stopped us....*shakes head*
48723
No one plan to Nuke the US specially Iranian, there are more Irani people in US than you can imagine, just go check your best universities like MIT or Stanford.\nThe only attack to US has done by Bin Laden and if you know he was created by CIA in order to prevent Afghanestan to have a government like Iran and Iranian supported Anti Taliban groups in Afghanestan all the time that US was supporting them, and Iran government yelled that he is a murderer, its not Iranian fault.\nUS don't like Iran to be a nuclear power, its a fact but you must search the reason elsewhere, its not hollywood movies, its politics.\nA nuclear Iran will ruin all power equations in Middle East. Even they can force US to leave the territory. That's the real reason.\nIran has threatened Israel to wipe out of the map for 30 years and nothing actually has happened and will not happen.\nThe main use of Nuke isn't military, its political, look at India and Pakistan, they declared they are both have nukes at the same time. they both have it but it was hidden, when one did a nuclear test the other one did it about a week. Can you get my point?\nAbout Iran and Israel there are many hidden facts that I'm not in the mood to repeat(if you really like to know them ask here or email me)\nAnyways don't worry, we will not nuke you, one who has to worry is me because once nice Americans  attacked an Iranian AirBus which was full of civilan travelers and I'm young and want to live long to see my grandchildren.
191176
NO.\nDo you think only the U.S. has nuclear weapons?\nSuch dangerous and irresponsible action would only make\nnon-American world leaders more nervous than Bush has already made them-and many of them also have control of nukes.\n As well,it's only a matter of time before it's possible before some terrorist group has the capacity to make or\nacquire a nuclear device,and I'm sure what you propose would not only accelerate the process but make the most deadly form of retaliation there is inevitable. The world's\nchanged a lot since Hiroshima.\n There has to be another way to handle the Middle East,more\nfinesse than that is required.
1144711
No,they won't.If America is smart enough I don't think they'll mess with Iran.'Cos Iran it's not Iraq or Afghanistan.And US doesn't have the financial and human resources to start another war.It would be lost from the start.
649516
Anything 'can' happen, but what is the probability that it will happen? Consider this scenario, Iran developes an operational nuke in 2012 and decides to lob it at Tel Aviv.  The US and what's remaining of the Israels airforce would strike at Iran with conventional, and possibly nuclear weapons.  Will N. Koren, China and Russia come to Iran's defence or will they take the opportunity to attack S. Korea and takeover Taiwan, while the US attentions are elsewhere.   \n\nOr what happens if the US or Israel uses a nuke at the hardened facility at Natanz in 2007, or before 2012?  Russia and China still ascribe to the M.A.D. doctrine, but the rogue state of N.Korea does not.  Therefore, the probability of a nuclear showdown is greater with them.  Depending on their actions, the iranian fiasco could escalate into a global confrontation.
577249
YES! Russia gave a verbal agreement to Iran and other Muslim nations that they will defend Islamic interests back in December of last year.\nChina is in agreement and has Russia's back. You do the math.
349079
If USA nukes Iran, then it would be the advent of another nuclear war. And Once again it would be proved that organizations like UNO are useless against superpower THE USA...!!!\n\nIts high time that people stand up to human rights and stop becoming slaves of power which is nothing but money.\n\nIran and Iraq are the only countries which refused to give oil to states. And then the usa under the pretext of destroying the Weapons of mass destruction, bombed Iraq. \n\nAnd Iran is also not bowing down- and though it went to The Security Council but because its majorly ran by THE USA... it had no where to go...!!!\n\nOne nuclear attack will kill the world...!!! Its high time that people stand for whats right... and not whats wrong...!!! are we waiting for death...???
68592
I think that this question is totally irrelevant. If Iran( or any muslim nation against USA)  builds nuclear facilities (civilian or military) americans will destroy that country (only becoz they c them as a threat).\n\nI think that america's common sense has been permanantly crippled by bin laden. Post 911 America views the whole world suspiciously (except their slaves in UK and friends in Israel). America has ever since been contradicting themselves. Remember the war in iraq, it was fought bcoz bush claimed to have evidence of non existent weapons and the threat of a dictator.My question to the world is "If iraq , y not pakistan?". Mushy's a dictator and one who openly admits to having nuclear weapons.\n\nI predict that soon the patience of the international community will run out. A grand alliance (Russia, China , France , India and the Arab world) could be formed so that america and americans will exist only in history textbooks.