will there be any other world war after the world war2?give reasons for your answer.if possible give web links
464486
There will always be world wars (if you're counting there have actually been nine, including the American Revolution, and the French and Indian War or Seven Years War depending on where you live) \n   There will be more world wars, as long as there are violent people on the earth, they just might not be labeled as such.
108667
We are not going to have a WWIII anytime soon.  The polarization that affected the world in the 20th century is not present.  Democracies rarely if ever go to war with one another.  Since almost the entire worlds wealth is in 10 countries, all democracies, I do not see a political conflict ever arising.  The only wild card is China. When they do rise to economic and military prominence, there could be a destabilization of Asia.  If they also convert to a social democracy there will be no real threat of a world war.\n\nCulturally there is a war, between Jedo-Christianity and Islam.  The birthrate in European countries is so low that their Islamic immigrants will outnumber the original inhabitants of France, Italy, and Germany in 100 years.  The distinct differences beftween the cultures will have to blur or there will be another holocaust, which side will do it, who knows?  Remember Bosina-Herzogovina??  Orthodox Christians decimating and raping muslims to wipe them out.   If nations are pushed to the brink of extinction, they will use all means available.  Another cultural wildcard, India.\n\nNo one knows what will happen, I just hope that the Israeli-Palestinian confllict is resolved fairly and justly for both sides, that moderate and tolerant religeous leaders of all faiths prevail, instead of the fear and hatred that is growing all over the world.  \n\nI have hope, that with no facist or expansionist communist regime with any money or resources, our world will eventually learn to be at relative peace.
517127
The 3rd WW will be different from the 1st and 2nd. It may already have started. Iraq fighting USA and its allies (most of the developed world) is one example. We could add in Afghanistan and Iran. Turkey is drawn into it because of the Kurds. The Russians are still fighting the Chechen's and others. Israel has been fighting its neighbours for 60 years. There are many battles going on in Africa. The Chinese, Koreans and Japanese are the not the best of friends. India and Pakistan have been fighting in Kashmir for years. The list is a long one. \nWhat is the third world war about: People use religion as an excuse but it is not religion. It is about ignorance and stupidity. The best example of this the USA.
643866
I certainly hope so!  Sometimes I wonder if the neo-isolationists have ever read about how Hitler was allowed to build his war machine and launch WWII?  Ten years later, 6 million dead Jews, after a global war.  OOPS?!\n\nDoes anyone really think that the U.S. should do nothing about rogue states like Iraq and Iran and Afghanistan under the Taliban?
918556
The United States and Britain!\nAnd here is the reason for it since the first World War!\n\nhttp://www.thelastoutpost.com/site/1330/default.aspx
440322
Was there a WW1? Did WW2 follow? Think about it
780312
i havent heard of any german soldiers doing this.  but i have heard of japanese doing up to 30 years after the war ended
138731
I think you should look to Germany right after World War II.
271340
Got news for you.  The others you speak of will develope new systems no matter what we do.  So yes, it is justified by that alone.  In the history of Humankind, those who do not prepare for war are always defeated, at least initially, by those who did.\n\nLessons include the French in WWII who saw the Germans re-arm, saw the tactics of the German Army in Poland, saw that their tactics and equipment (the French Char Bis tanks were good, but suffered from limited usage of radios) were not up to par, and frankly wished the war away until it was too late.\n\nBritton also saw the comming of WWII, but was slow to arm, upgrade, and change tactics.  Several humiliating losses later, they matured very quickly while London burned.\n\nGermany, while advancing steadily in WWII, chose to ignore logistics and over-engineered their systems to the point a Panzer Division sometimes had 10 different tank types from PZ-38t's to PZIIIs (model A-J), PZIV's (models A-F), Tiger's (2 models), King Tigers, assault guns (STUs), Mobile AT guns (based on the different PZ chasis), etc and so on.  This became a mechanic's nightmare of systems.\n\nThe US in WWI-WWII had spent little money on upgrading/producing systems and suffered greatly in WWII.  The venerable M1 Garand rifle was not available until mid 1942 in large numbers and the USMC at Wake, Midway, the fall of the Phillipines, and Guadal(sp) Canal still used bolt action M1903A3 Springfield rifles and ancient machineguns.  US tanks were the inferior in armor and firepower to the Germans until the M26 Pershing came out in 1944.  At the current rate of soildier casualties in the War on Terror, it would take the US 200 years to equal the casualties it suffered in WWII.\n\nThat is but one example.  But here is what you, as a civilian get from these projects (short list): Surgery, Open-heart surgery, prostectics, blood clotting agents, infectious disease control research, computers, hybrid vehicles (the first were submarines), GPS, Helicopters, radar, microwaves, the internet, nomex/kevlar fire resistant materials, nano-machines, intelligent robots (one even crawls through natural gas pipes to check for leaks), Gortex, increased gasoline engine efficiency, nuclear power, x-rays, etc and so on.
281835
try "The Great War For Civilisation" by Robert Fisk.  You will need to go back further than 20 years too as the current problems are rooted in the decisions made after the first and second world wars.  This book covers other countries in the Middle East too.
11700
of course, it is only a matter of time before we find something to fight about on a world war level.  WWIII is inevitable, just like the sun rising, poverty, finding out Santa isn't real, and Google becoming the next big monopoly.
1143930
There would be timeline repercussions.  World War 2 might never have happened, and the world would be a drastically different place.  It might be worse, or it might be better, there could have been some other crazy guy that just didn't get in before Hitler.  \n\nYes, I probably would kill him, but what if there was someone even worse out there just waiting for a chance?
80430
I believe the end of the world as we know it will actually happen in our life times and it has already started.\n\nI know we have survived 2 World Wars already, but do you think we could all really survive a 3rd with nukes.  The US is the most powerfull country in the world and they are starting to flex some of that muscle around. Eventually the rest of the countries of the world will fight back. It will end up being a nuclear war, which would cause the end to us all even if we are to survive the war. This theorie in my opinion is even confermed in Revolations. War, plague, pestalence, ect.\n\nYes, I totally believe this.
429292
Here is a very nice world war 2 weapons site. The site is divided into sections (rifles, machine guns etc..) for every major nation involved. It even shows a picture of the weapon discussed
1152249
World war 3 is over already.  It was called in the media as the Cold War.  There was enough shooting, although the princaples in the war never shot at one another (although they came close, ie cuban missile crisis, berlin wall circa 1963, and some others)\n\nWars don't have to be fought on the battlefield, and there is definitely a winner.  The west won that one because of their ideas of freedom and democracy (France dosn't count)\n\nAs for world war 4, we are in the midst of it now.  The enemy is different, and the fighting is different.  This is a war against that peaceful religion of Islam.  It is more dangerous than any other war because of the nature of the fighting.  These "holy warriers" are nothing but cowards willing to kill and maim innocent people (shooting children in the back as in chechnia, beheading those kidnapped in Iraq, "suicide bombings" killing whoever is nearby, and so forth)\n\nSo, world war 4 is on, and only We can win it.  We need to support our soldiers and sailors, and take the fight to the cowards who are attacking us.  Send them to those 72 virgins and let God sort them out.
773866
The first world war was referred to both as \n' The Great War ' in old English referrence to large or of  moment, also, misleadingly, ' The War To End All Wars ' as the second world war disproved so effectively. It was called The Second World War from the start, I think. I prefer Archie Bunker's call on it:\n\n" Da big one. Douba - ya douba - ya two. "\n\nNo. I doubt there's going to be a WWIII. We all know it doesn't go out that way.
1148371
Um I think either North Korea or Iran might spark ww3. China & Russia would back them cuz they are communist or somehow allied or have common interests. I think on the side of the US, would be the UK, EU, Japan, & Austrailia. This is the big shocker though. The hidden communists in Canada would sieze power & use Canada as a staging ground to attack the US & UK. Most of ww3 would be fought in Canada or something along those lines with slight variations in the outcome depending on how it all unfolded.