What does "the Qualifying Quota  Share" means?
472242
Quota is used to refer to an allocation. The qualifying quota share would thus mean the alloted share.
721167
It means that upon your demand, the company has 45 days in which to include the shares issuable upon exercise of your warrant in a registration statement - which enables you to sell the shares (if you want to). It's fairly common for there to be a penalty if the company is unable to file a registration statement within the specified time period.\n\nIssuing new shares would be dilutive; but, the shares that were issuable should have been factored into diluted EPS\n\nTo exercise the warrant, there should be a form to exercise. If you don't have it, contact the company's investor relations department
590084
It is already abolished.\n\nNow a days it only surviving because of "reservation" and vote politics.\n\nReservaed quota is deviding the society today not the ancient cast system.
699990
Without more specifics, it could be a statutory consolidation as well.\n\nBut it sounds as though he is refering to a horizontal merger.
801294
It all relates to the P/E or the Price to Earnings ratio. It measures how much revenue or profit one share earns and compares that to the price you would pay for that one share on that open market.\n\nWhat you or your banker are talking about can be dangerous because you could be paying a lot of money for a share that does not have a lot or any income behind it at all so you would be in danger of losing your investement. This happened a lot in the dot come bust where sahres worth $500 or more were issued and bought for companies that weren't even making $.01 per share.
796222
http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/q/cp?s=%5EFTSE
454968
so if the program was completely filled with only indians, would you find this discrimination against other races? what if it was only white people, would it make a difference? my best guess at quota systems is that they are designed to prevent racial monopoly. ie all white schools have to let in other racial groups. the whole thing is racism regardless of fairness. no race should create a monopoly in any resource and then block out other races from having equal oppurtunity.  maybe this is not happening in your situation, then im sorry if your being discriminated against
340057
SHARE MARKETS ARE WELL KNOWN FOR ITS FLUCTUATIONS..\nNOW A DAYS THE INDEX GOING HIGHER..A SIGN WHICH SHOWS A COUNTRY'S ECONOMIC PROGRESS..\nWELL.\nE.C. IS HIGHLY EMPOWERED TO CONDUCT AN FAIR ELECTION OF THE WORLDS BIGGEST DEMOCRACY.
600221
It probably means that the commission the person would recieve would be 48-50% of what they had sold each month or year.  Also, they would be able to advance up to 4500 dollars a month of their salary, meaning they would be paid that amount before actually earning it.
1156990
It means that the stocks trade in the "pink sheet" market.  This is an over-the-counter stock market for very small-cap, thinly traded stocks.  Sometimes, when a stock can no longer meet the listing requirements for Nasdaq because of low market cap or low stock price, the stock is delisted and trades in the pink sheet market.
649224
It depends on the exact place of employment but a merit increase is an a increase you get when you have made a direct contribution to your company in some way. Such as an idea for the company to make more money, get better orgainized, a way to save company money, come up with an idea that can be used in some way. That sort of thing is considered merit. Now when you do something of this sort you be sure to bring this up in your evaluation. Your employer should but if they do not you do and do not be shy about it either. You deserve to be paid for what you know!!
67313
My goodness.  Some truly well thought-out and excellent answers here already.\n\nBy people who obviously have no idea what they're talking about.\n\nIn California, "quotas" are illegal.  Your question assumes they are legal and they exist, and I would certainly disagree with you.
1183503
Dividends are either qualified or non-qualified.  \n\nQualified dividends are the ordinary dividends received in tax years beginning after 2002 that are subject to the same 5% or 15% maximum tax rate that applies to net capital gain. They are shown in box 1b of Form 1099 –DIV.\n\nQualified dividends are subject to the new 15% maximum capital gains rate if the applicable regular tax rate is 25% or higher. If the applicable regular tax rate is lower than 25%, qualified dividends are subject to the new 5% maximum capital gains rate.\n\nTo qualify for the 5% or 15% maximum rate, all of the following requirements must be met:\n\nThe dividends must have been paid by a U.S. corporation or a qualified foreign corporation. (See qualified foreign corporation.) \nThe dividends are not of the type listed later under Dividends that are not qualified dividends. \nThe proper holding period is met \n\nNon-qualified dividends are taxed at the taxpayers nominal rate.
960754
It is legal to use race as one of a number of factors is determining admissions.  This was decided by the Supreme Court (Bakke decision).  The ruling stated that race cannot be used as the primary factor in determining admissions, but can be used as part of the decision process.\n\nAlthough no company will ever admit to quotas in the job market, it does exist.  Diversity is the new way of life to many people.
696661
Did you read your own link? The government's quotas were to protect the market for other farmers and not induce surpluses to drive prices lower than what would be necessary to successfully maintain the farms. This is similar to monopoly laws. In the link you cited, the following statement was made:\n\n"Roscoe Filburn exceeded his production quota by 239 excess bushels. To consume this amount in the form of bread, Mr. Filburn and his family would have had to consume nearly 44 one-pound loaves each day for the following year."\n\n44 pounds a day of bread? Come on now. Filburn was obviously trying to capitalize on the free enterprize system at other farmers expense!!!\n\nHad the government allowed Filburn to go unchecked, he would have saturated the local market with grain, lowering the price per bushel, allowing him to come out OK with his mass production but putting other farmers at risk as the excess supply would have driven the price too low for them to keep their farms running. They would have probably foreclosed, then Filburn would have a local monopoly on wheat grain in following years allowing him to sell for inflated price because his competition would have already been eliminated.\n\nPolice State? Not hardly! Your example clearly shows our government looking out for the people on a long-term basis.
331294
Typically it means "interim" financial until more permanent debt can be arranged ---generally there is a permanent lender ready to lend but their may be a timing issue or some conditions to be met before the permanent lender can fund -- the borrower then seeks out a bridge loan (typically at a higher rate) until she/he can close on the permanent financning
932703
There are no set rules.  The S&P Index Committee has the final say based on their own criteria.  If you want the full explanation, it is here:\n\nhttp://www.ifa.com/Media/Images/PDF%20files/SP500_Rules_GeneralCriteria.pdf\n\nIt is an easy read.\n\n.