What is the difference between Jurassic Park movie and the book, i need three main points for an essay?
456963
1. Rent and watch the movie.\n\n2. Read the book.\n\n3. Stop trying to get others to do what you should be doing for yourself.
1160748
The book was better ,the movie was great . If you havent read the book read it 1st then watch the movie.
973434
The book is better than the movie and neither are outstanding.  they are ok.  It would be hard to follow the movie and really understand what is happening without reading the book.  I think both book and movie have been highly over-rated.\n\nIn terms of getting to sit and watch a movie - maybe if you have a portable DVD player and you take it into the bathroom with you and lock the door and refuse to come out until it is finished!!  When y kids were little that was the only place I could read for a few minutes!  How about hubby taking care of the kids for a couple of hours so you can watch a movie undisturbed?  Otherwise, hire a baby-sitter for a few hours so you and hubby can go to a  movie.  I sympathize!!  Best of luck!  They do grow up and before you know it the house will be quiet!!
853249
This is basically the same question you asked three hours ago.\n\nIt's all basic recall of facts from the book. Try re-reading the chapter.\n\nDo you HONESTLY expect someone to answer 21 homework questions for you?
540905
The name of the movie is "Intensity".  There is a book that the movie was made from written by Dean Koontz.  The book was even more Intense then the movie.  Forgive the pun.
187579
Paragraph 1 - list the name of the book and the author. (If it's part of a series, you can mention that too). Also mention the genre (fiction, non-ficition, fantasy, sci-fi, historical ficition, whatever)\n\nParagraph 2 - Describe a few of the main charcters (no more than three). Tell a little bit about what they're like and what they do\n\nParagraph 3 - Summarize the book. \n\nParagraph 4 - Tell what you liked and or didn't like about the book. Would you recomend it to a friend? Why or why not?\n\nGood Luck!
496332
Ads, tv shows and the news according to my 16 year old daughter who did read the book this year for school. I recommend you do that, too. It is not very long and it is very interesting.\n\nhttp://www.sparknotes.com/lit/451/summary.html\n\nthe above is an online Sparknotes guide to the book which should help you to get to the important parts more easily. \n\nNow get to work!! LOL.
912409
Ok the most easy way to get around such a question would be :The book is better than the movie".It actually counts for 98% of the adaptations.But The DaVinci code fits in the 2% of the cases where the movie is actually better than the book.\n \n       First of all Ron Howard (a beautiful mind) is a great director.The book itself did not appear so great to me having a rather bad character development (leading to the dissapointing revelation of the finale) and having the scientist explain it everything so that anybody can grasp the action is too much artifialism for me.For example Langdon dont need to explain the history of Paris to a french woman who herself is an Academic.This appears to a point in the movie but since the action is preety more spectacular it covers it uo.\n\nAlso the book has no fluidity.The chaptres last 2 1&#92;2 half pages maximum and the action is cut much to often.This leads to a confusion because you get to a point where the change of background-people leaves you with a strange sence.The movie is far better.The director not willing to follow all the cuts and changes of the author produces a more solid scenaro leaving the audience understand the changes.For example Langdon and the girl in the book seem (not ARE )the same in the beginning and the end which does not happen to the movie.\n    The standard motto is "go with the book".But this time I will choose the film instead
384913
The first thing you need to know is just what the teacher is asking for. If it is completely open, you have great choices. What about a character comparison between the main character and his protagonist. What about an indepth look at differnt themes with pertinent references to current world issues. It is a sci-fi book, look at what social aspects Bradbury predicted and what has actually become real. Otherwise you could compare Bradbury's writing style with one of his contemporaries.\ngood luck
103466
1. The story is true.\n2. It describes not entertains.\n3. If it is a library book, it has a number rather than all  letters.
841502
Your teacher assinged a report on the movie and not the book?  How strange.  You can get the movie at any video rental place.  You can get background on the story from Sparknotes or Grade Saver.  You can get background on the movie from IMDb.com
374559
Its an amino acid that the body produces.  In the movie they genetically engineer the dinosaurs not to produce it so that unless they are given it in the foods the animals would die incase they ever get off the island.
320883
Hey the Trilogy are books.  Don't just go by the movie, the books are more interesting and don't send you to sleep. Start with "The Hobbit", then move on to "The Lord of the Rings" and if you wish to go further "The Silmarillon" although that one is a bit heavy going.\n\nTo answer your question:\n1. There are many forces at work in the world that we do not understand.\n2. The individual can make a difference\n3. Taking care of the natural world and the environment is very important, properly looked after they will look after you.\n4. Working together, the weak can beat the strong
548035
Movie Based on book:- It seems an easy thing to do, but most of us have different impressions on any given book. The movie version is what the Director perceives as the definition of the book. A book can hold ten times more information. So making the movie, most of the book is lost.\nThe best way, in my opinion, to make the movie is to allow the book Author to write the screenplay.\n\nSequels:- When they first started to appear (1980's) they where mainly a money making devise to line the pockets of the movie companies, with no thought to quality. Now, they are as much big business but the quality is highly improved.\n\nRemakes:- Cashing in on old classics, just like 80's sequels.
971049
Do your own homework...\n\nbut direct characterization is where the author comes out right and says characteristics.  So look for descriptions and introductions of characters in the book.
1086391
i think that it is funny how seriously people are taking it. it's a novel not a historical book. anyway the movie sucks if u read the book and liked it i would recomend not seeing th movie, the movie dosn't explain a lot of things and left me more confused about the plot than anything else.
551940
read the book seen the movie, both are great, though book is by far better. \n\nthe moral is knowing to stand up for ones who can't stand up to them themselves. \n\nhope it helps!