who believes the seahawks were robbed of the superbowl?
461585
oh absolutely, and it was one of the worst superbowls ever...very boring because even with all the calls going the steelers way, they still couldnt dominate the seahawks. it was an utter disgusting and cheap game that was ruled by the referees and its a shame this type of conspiracy and fixed games is happening in a great sport; not to mention the biggest game of the year. i will always hate the overrated ben roethlisberger so it was a relief to know that they got one thing right at least. They gave the superbowl mvp to the best steeler, Hines Ward.
64644
YES!!!! I did not relax when the Steelers were beating the crap out of them, and then even less so when it got close and closer. I did however feel it was going to be close and I thought they would pull it out. Going in I thought if the Steelers won today they would win the Superbowl, which will hold to be true I hope.
32070
logic..and judge is gay....lol..Steelers..they win , they can stop the seahawks run..did you see how SA was shining the second half against the pan?..steelers d is not gonna lay down like that...the hawks have an antsy QB ,the blitz will be perfect..HAHAHAHAHA.....they(hawks have alot of talent, i see how under a great coach they have strived to be better..they deserve to be where they are....but did you see RoeRoe(QB) on fire!!!???!!he was in the zone and the oc was pulling out all the stops...i look forward to the super bowl two great teams and two of the most emotional coaches in the game..since they both had 30 plus points in the last playoff games.... this Extra Large(XL)Superbowl should be one for the ages!!....now the superbowl wait begins!! ...Ben AKA RoeRoe.. Super Bowl MVP!!
103777
THE STEELERS DID WIN THE SUPERBOWL  \n\nALL YOU SEAHAWK FANS GET OVER IT.
139609
The better team won the Super Bowl.  I'm not a Pittsburgh fan, but they played well enough to win.  The Seahawks did not execute as well as the Steelers.  Too many dropped passes and an ineffective running game did them in.  Three big plays by Pittsburgh were the difference.
1093255
I sure do. The Carolina Panthers have a nice team this year. The seahawks are the only team that could challenge the Panthers in NFC and I don't think they'll make the playoffs this year. Somebody's gettin injured this year(MVP)
926971
yeah he aint doin so well\n\n\n\nGO SEAHAWKS
286587
I have seen the game 3 times and all the "bad calls" and the only call that was bad for the Seahawks was the one on the QB for the chop block. The Steelers could complain about the refs as well. There was a fumble by #86 we did not get and a block in the back on the Steelers QB Ben during the interception return that was not called. Besides how could people be surprised the the Steelers won, they beat better teams than Seattle in the run up to the Super Bowl. Clearly the Steelers are the better team. Seattle played a weak schedule in a weak conference in a weak division. They did not play the level of competition the Steelers did.
206122
I was somewhat disappointed.  I just wish Parcells and the rest of the team would get their act together and get back to winning superbowls like they did when Jimmy was there.  It's not all about 1 coach, it's a team effort when it comes to winning games.
499391
Who hasn't?  Prob after the superbowl wins.
559603
Whatever they paid... wasn't worth it. Millions of fans were heart-broken.\nBTW, you sure they paid? You know our football players tend to have the worst luck ever.
337481
The patriots were so lucky.  any knowledgeable football fan whos watches that play fulll speed knows it was a sack and a fumble, how the refs got it wrong I'll never know.  Im from St. Louis, and I feel robbed beacuse the raiders are my team, and my two favorite teams would have played in the SB that year.  \nI'll go one further and say that if that game goes differently, the pats would have never won a S.B. they won so many games in the 4th quarter, or after they were loosing all game.  Most teams that played the pats lost the games before they played them.  They would get too hyped up or physyced up the whole week before, and would blow the game when most teams had a shot to win.  Coaches and players would be scared of the pats, and consequently the would micromanage the game to the point where they would throw the game away in the 4th quarter.  The  colts have been a better team through those years, but could'nt get it done.  The pats are not as good as it seems.  I mean come on, there really werent any great players on those teams, and besides Lucky azz Brady, probably none of them will get in the hall of fame.  Bilicheck is the only one who deserves any respect, and besides that the pats are not half as good as people thought they were.  F-brady, F-the pats.
42566
No, the seahawks will.  :D  They're kickin butt!!
1969
you better believe it\n\nthey were robbed last year
117920
Yes. I think the Seahawks' failure to score contributed heavily to their eventual loss. They should've scored, which would've negated the Steelers' momentum going into the second half.
128541
No,questionable calls.......yes. Seattle had its chances,and was out-coached.
1281
No, for two reasons:\n\n1. They're not as good as their overall record (11-2). They play in the uber-weak NFC West which means fat helpings of the Niners, Rams and Cardinals. Yum. They're 3-2 versus teams with winning records (and the Giants game really should have made that 2-3). So I don't think they're that much better than the Giants, Bears/Vikes, Bucs, Panthers, Falcons, Cowboys and Skins--doesn't mean they can't get there, I just don't think they're the overwhelming favorite that their record would indicate.\n\n2.) A lot of the time, teams reach the Conference Championship once and lose at least once before winning and going to the Super Bowl. It's not a lock, it's not certain (and it depends a lot on the competition), but look for the Seahawks to make it to the NFC Championship and lose to someone recently experienced in getting to the next level like the Bucs/Giants/Panthers.