Is limestone mined in virginia?
470110
http://www.mme.state.va.us/Dmm/Orphaned%20Mineral%20Mines/Docs/Orphaned%20Mineral%20Mines.htm\n\nEach year West Virginia mines and quarries produce 10 to 13 million tons of limestone and dolomite valued at between $40,000,000 and $53,000,000. These materials are used to make a wide variety of products, including: construction aggregate, agricultural lime, coal mine safety dust, fluxing agents, desulfurization sorbents for coal-fired power plants, lime, and acid neutralizers. (Copy from: http://www.wvgs.wvnet.edu/www/geology/geolmrls.htm)
1041596
Certainly not an active one that I know about.  It would be really wierd to have one in Port Deposit, since it's right on the shores of the Susquehanna River.\n\nThis area is not known for being geologically active.  Most of that is farther to the west in the Appalachians.
690069
Good question.\n\nLimestone is found in the earth.  Refined Limestone and limestone in it's pure form is known as Calcium Carbonate.  (CaCO3).\nIf you mix limestone with water, you'll get some mixing, but not all the limestone will go into solution.  What did go into solution can be "painted" onto a wall but it won't stay past the next few rains.  \nIn order to use limestone for paint, it has to be refined.  In other words, it has to go through a chemical reaction such as Carbonation, in order to get the product that you desire.  \nPlease see my sources for more information.
480107
There's been some silver found along Brush Creek outside Peebles in Adams County and in Clifton Gorge on the east fork of the Yellow Springs Creek in Greene County.\n In Hancock County there are pay to dig areas where you can find Celestite, Dolomite-Pyrite and fossils and the same in Putman County.\n Ohio also has some glacial gold and a few diamonds have been found but as far as I know, no Aquamarine. You have lots of stuff you can look for just not what you're wanting to look for. Best of luck to you.
544445
yes i am from va...represening va beach and hampton area and richmond area, charlottesville area\n\ndont forgtet all of 757 804 434
317914
Yes, I lived in Virginia when he was first elected governor.  I'd like to see how far he could go with a run for the presidency.
597986
Take a close look at the coal mines of West Virginia! Poor people went to work in the mines and formed whole mining towns. As the mines got bigger the towns literally sank, slid off of mountains, etc.
1069528
The Blue Dick Mine is in Nevada, near Lida.\n\nNot sure I ever heard of the Able Mable Mine.
344762
Virginia Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation is responsible for contractors.  Contact them for more information.
695984
No i love Virginia fuck those laws they dont aplly to me lol but anyways its a very versetile place theres southern country living parts like Montross,Farhnam,Tappahanock where CHRIS BROWN LIVES,those beautiful places to raise a family then there are plenty of suburbs like Fredericksburg and stafford that are pretty much picture perfect towns Then you have the spots that look like conneticut that are dated back to the 1800s like dowtown Fredericksburg. Then you have very urban places like Alexandria and were only minutes from urban dc. And Richmond with has some of the most beautiful Italian Archetecture with the cathedrals,then you have the blue ridge area where its all beautiful moutains,Then you have great beach spots like Virginia beach one of the best party spots on the east coast, and colonial beach. Whether your lookinf for a Country,urban,part,beachy,farm living,moutainliving,suburbs,European influencd,or New england influenced area you got it.
1027799
Send orders to: Daniel W. Bly, 403 18th Street, Grottoes, VA 24441; e-mail: dwbly@aol.com\n\nEighteenth-century Swiss and German pioneer families of the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia and their European origins and ancestors. Families in this volume: Brambach, Coffelt, Foltz, Hockman, Hoover, Niswanger-Niswander, Stephens, Wakeman, and Zehring.
110134
First of all, Virginia is not a state...it's a Commonwealth.  And second, the largest collection of mentally retarded individuals in the Commonwealth of Virginia can be found in the Governor's Mansion.
206254
In the 1940s to 1960s the coal mining communities were really booming.  I live in an area in West Virginia that use to be the home of millionaires.  Now it is really sad.  It is not a really horrible place, but it tries its best to put on a good front.  The city of Bluefield WV was a hot spot then.  Check out coal mining communities today and yester year.  Also a place called Bramwell, WV might just bring ome interest to you.
416736
There are no federal regulations to speak of regarding  scrap yards or junk yards. it is normally the local authorities that have jurisdiction over who can operate, where they can operate.\n\nYou need to contact the local townships were each scrap yard resides.\n\nThe only thing the federal agencies monitor is OSHA who supervises safety, the EPA and DEP who monitor ground and air problems.\n\nIn West Virginia you can contact the "DEQ" Virginia Department of Environmental Quality  -  629 East Main Street  - P.O. Box 10009  -  Richmond, VA 23240-0009  -  (804) 698-4000 or 1-800-592-5482\n\nThe Department of Environmental Quality's enforcement mission is to take fair and consistent enforcement actions to ensure compliance with Virginia’s environmental laws and regulations in a manner that promotes the health and well being of the Commonwealth’s citizens and protects its environment.
807222
Might be neither if intended for racing. There's a Horse Industry Board . . .\n\nI did a search of cases. Without my going too deeply into the question it seems to me that horses can be any of the above: pets, livestock or racing stock.\n\nThere's one case that dances around the issue without addresing it exactly: F.A, Schottroffe Trust v. Trenary, 10 Va. Cir. 21, 1986 WL 401735 (Va.Cir.Ct. 1986). But even that one is not too helpful; and no Virginia statute addresses the issue. Look for yourself at: http://leg1.state.va.us/000/src.htm\n\n\n10 Va. Cir. 21, 1986 WL 401735 (Va. Cir. Ct.)\n\nCircuit Court of Virginia, Warren County.\n\nF. A. Schottroffe Trust v. William C. Trenary, et al\n\nAT LAW NO. 7594.February 14, 1986.\n\n*1 In this case the plaintiff claims damages arising out of the trespass by the defendant's cattle on the land of the plaintiff in a "no fence" county. The Court is required to pass upon the sufficiency of Ground No. 4 of the grounds of defense setting forth the affirmative defenses of contributory negligence and unavoidable accident. Both parties have submitted authorites on those issues but the Court notes that the defendant has filed no pleading testing the sufficiency of that ground of defense and makes this ruling upon the assumption that the appropriate pleading will be filed to raise that issue.\n\nHenry H. Whiting, Judge.\n\nWarren County has declared the boundary lines of each tract of land as a lawful fence to cattle in Article 1, Section 4-1 of its Code and the effect of this is to make the owner of the animals liable for their trespasses under the provisions of Virginia Code Section 55-330, which Poindexter v. May, 98 Va. 143 , 148 (1900), says restores the common law rule "which requires the owner of animals to keep them on his own land." Tate v. Ogg, 170 Va. 95, 101 (1938), described the Poindexter holding as "...that while at common law the owner of domestic animals was required, at his own peril, to keep them on his own land, or within enclosures, the rule has been changed in Virginia, as to certain animals, including horses and cattle, by legislative action, except in those counties where a .no fence' law had been adopted under the provisions of the Code." (Emphasis added.) Tate held that turkeys were animals outside of the statutory "fence" exception to the common law, making the owner absolutely liable for their trespasses, id., at 104, but refused to grant an injunction because the trespasses were only occasional, not willful and the damages at most were of trivial and inconsequential nature, id., at 107. Minor on Real Property (Ribble's Ed.), Section 122 at page 163, cites the common law rule, including Poindexter v. May as one of his authorities as:\n\n[I]ndependently of statute, or agreement to that effect, there exists no obligation upon the owner of land to fence it in, in order to keep out trespassing persons or cattle, there being at common law an absolute obligation upon other persons to remain on their own lands or in the highways and public places, to keep their cattle there, by means of fences or otherwise. In other words, in the case of cattle and domestic animals, the common law placed the duty upon the owner of the animals to keep them upon his own land by fences or other means, and imposed no duty upon the owner of the other land to keep them out.\n\nThe Restatement of Torts echoes this same rule in Section 504 in the following language:\n\n*2 A possessor of livestock which intrude upon the land of another is liable for their intrusion and for any harm done while upon the land to its possessor or a member of his household although the possessor of the livestock exercised the utmost care to prevent them from intruding. ...The liability imposed by the rule stated in this section is based primarily upon possession of the straying livestock and not upon the quality of the possessor's conduct. The fact that he has
140753
I dont know that much about that but its pretty easy to find if you use search. Here is what I came up with for you.\nhttp://www.eenorthcarolina.org/public/ecoaddress/riverbasins/RoanokeRiverBasin.htm
1069414
Sounds like an educator question. ;) \n\nA GREAT page on this subject is found at\n\nhttp://apgar.net/virginia/\n\nwith both the details you ASK, as well as the *big picture* answer. :)