what is sponcership scandal in canada ?
464330
From 1994 - 2003, more than $150 million in commissions and production fees were paid to Liberal-friendly communication agencies on the basis of unpriced tenders.  These agencies were selected by senior Liberals in Quebec, along with senior officials in the Department of Public Works and (allegedly) the Prime Minister's Office.\n\nWithout telling Parliament, Prime Minister Chretien creates a secret $332 million fund to enhance Quebec's perception of the federal government.\n\nSo in plain english the Chretien government grossly mis-used millions of tax payers dollars.
180664
As frustrating as our Canadian government can be, I can't say that I have heard of anything as absurd as U.S. politics. Actors are always trying their hand at politics. I don't get it! Weird...
909243
Unless the girls live in Canada they are really going to have to return to the US to be interviewed, examined and file charges.\n\nYou can prepare the case by talking to experts and to chld welfare agencies and charities now.\n\nDon't rely on Y! Answers for serious matters of this kind.
293915
hi,\n\nthere is a bit about cheque fraud on this page:\nhttp://www.crimes-of-persuasion.com/Laws/Canada/criminal_laws.htm\n\nthis page from the mounties\nhttp://www.rcmp-learning.org/iim/ecdi1018.htm\ndiscusses it further:\n\n-----\n\nAt this point we should divert for a few moments and discuss the issue of NSF cheques. This is one of the most common false pretence offences you will encounter and it would be well to clarify that issue now.\n\nRead Sub-section 362(4) of the Criminal Code of Canada.\n\nYou probably noted that this sub-section is designed specifically to deal with NSF cheques. It places the onus of proof on the person writing the cheque, to show reasonable belief at the time of writing, that the cheque would have been honoured. This "reverse onus" takes effect the instant it is dishonoured due to insufficient funds.\n\nThis is a controversial issue which has been challenged (R. v. Driscoll (1987), 38 CCC (3d) 28 Alt, Ca).  Some courts have deemed it to be a violation of the constitutional rights, contrary to Sub-section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees presumption of innocence until proven guilty.\n\nThe Canada Evidence Act (Section 29), provides authority to obtain documentary evidence of "no funds", or "NSF" cheques. \n\n------\n\nanother link:\nhttp://www.lawyers.ca/dharris/articles/fraudrevistedpartiii.htm\n\n\nalso, be aware that in the US, it is NOT considered criminal to write an NSF check for a DEBT:\nhttp://www.ckfraud.org/penalties.html\n\ni don't know about canada.  probably best to ask a lawyer; most will give you a free 1-hr consultatoin.  keep in mind that since it's such a small amount ($100) you are unlikely to get the officials interested in pressing charges.  it's possible though.  i think small claims court is probably your best bet.
983801
try here:http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/home_e.shtml\n\ncanada justice system
229443
He had a heart condition and apparently was getting his drugs off a website based in Canada or something.  No, really, he was.  How he could do that I don't know, but whatever.  Either that, or he just died of boredom.  The ICJ is not known for fair & speedy trials.\n\nThe official report, of course, is a heart attack, which amazed me.  The SOB actually *had* a heart?
834175
I am not familiar with the concept of "issue" - must be Canadian.
813039
WE don't want trouble makers we have enough of our own lol.\n\nI guess they need permission not just from P.O. but from Canada too.\n\nwww.canada.gc.ca
7830
Canada. Why, you running from the law?
674007
I know several Canadians that put US folks to shame where politics are concerned. They are much more attuned to international affairs, domestic affairs than their southern neighbors are attuned to Canadian affairs.
596266
We'll never know the real story right now because:\n\n1) Its Afghanistan and its a very very complicated place.\n2) In war, truth is always hard to find.  (in part because of the chaos of war but also on purpose because controlling information is an important part of military tactics)\n3) Even if our decision makers knew the real truth of what is going on, which is doubtful, they still wouldn't tell us.\n4) There are more than one or two story-lines happening at the same time.\n\nSo if you want a long factual based answer, you're not going to get one no matter who responds to your question.\n\nIf you want opinions, there's lots to go around.\n\nIf you want the truth, go there yourself and keep searching but even there it will be hard to find.\n\nIf you want my opinion, its simply because the Taliban were very very bad people and some of us nice Canadians are willing to risk our necks to help people get out from under their boot prints.
896163
Do you know the Canadian law, and court processes.\n\nGo to a consulate or an embassy talk to their lawyer, he will be able to explain.\n\nJust a call may do. Request professional courtesy, and a call back, if a lawyer is not available.
435911
riddsridds i feel the same way  they will take from canada, let them seperate who cares anyways.\ncanadianphatkid@hotmail.com
1108761
I don't believe it's against Canada, it can be any country they can target. These guys that got caught were in Canada....
48306
http://www.notcanada.com/
1069771
a cop can search you for reasonable suspicion. in the us i know its legit. not sure about canada.
637652
Canada has similar programs, In the good ole US, we deny we have a drug problem, but we do offer needle exchanges for folks to get new clean ones, so they don't share.