Does anyone speaks (Aramic), jesus first language?
465530
No, there are several dialects spoken in Syria and Lebanon which are similiar to Aramaic, but Aramaic died out about the time the Muslims conquered the Middle East and forced Arabic on everyone.
1004381
No. \nSource 1:\n    * 1 Cor. 12:7-11, "But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal. For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit; To another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit; To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues. But all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will."\n\n    * 1 Cor. 12:29-30, "Are all apostles? are all prophets? are all teachers? are all workers of miracles? Have all the gifts of healing? do all speak with tongues? do all interpret?"\n\nNot all speak in tongues because God doesn't give the gift to everyone.  Speaking in tongues is not THE sign of salvation, but A sign.  If anything, the fruit of the indwelling Spirit of God is listed in Gal. 5:22-23 is the sign of salvation.  \n\n    "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law" (Gal. 5:22-23).\n\nSource 2: Was there a point in time when you surrendered your life to Christ? Was there a moment of brokenness when you recognized that you are indeed ungodly and cannot become righteous by your deeds? Have you invited Jesus into your heart and made Him Lord? Has there been a change so that you are no longer living for the world, but living for Christ. Walking in obedience out of love for God is evidence of salvation. Speaking in tongues is not.
577242
Even as an atheist I have to support this idea, especially when it comes to English tutoring. Anyone spending five minutes on this site realizes that we are experiencing a language crisis in this country. Spelling and grammar have become passe, leading to one incomprehensible post after another. So please, please, please speak to your pastor or whomever you need to in order to implement such a program.\n\nAnd, in the name of whatever you consider holy, take the time to explain the difference between "there," "their," and "they're."
620667
yes\nThere is a lot spoken about tongues all in Corinthians. \nRemember tongues is speaking in another language such as if I spoke in Spanish right now comprenda. It is not babbling.\n\n1 Corinthians 12:8For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom;  to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit; 9 To another faith by the same Spirit;  to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit; 10 To another the working of miracles;  to another prophecy;  to another discerning of spirits;  to another divers kinds of tongues;  to another the interpretation of tongues: 11But all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will.
753433
Aramaic.  He may have also spoken Greek, which was a common language, believe it or not, in the Middle East at that time among educated people.  He may also have spoken Hebrew.  But, it's assumed that, assuming that Jesus actually existed, that he spoke Aramaic, since that was actually the local language at that time.  Hebrew was then the ancient religious language, but common people spoke Aramaic.\n\nLittle is known about the historical Jesus, however.  The Gospels are some of the few pieces of evidence that we actually have about him/Him (I don't want to offend Atheists or Christians :-) ).  BTW, there are more than just the 4 Gospels in the Bible.  There were quite a number of them.  Many of these were collected in the Nag Hammadi Library (which you can get in a book - look for that title on Amazon).  You can also read about them in _The Gnostic Gospels_ by Elaine Pagels.  The average time at which the Gospels were written is about 100 AD, quite awhile after Jesus died and it's unclear to scholars whether any of them were actually written by the actual discipals or just by Christians who identified themselves as those discipals.\n\nSo, it's rather difficult to know much about Jesus.  Some scholars have even said that there's no real evidence, apart from the Gospels, which they see as suspect, that he/He ever existed.  Even if he/He did, it's unclear what sort of person he/He was.  Was Jesus well educated, in which case he/He probably spoke Greek?  Was he/He actually a rabbi, in which case he/He almost certainly  knew Hebrew as well as Aramaic?  I don't think we really know for sure.
570802
not sure how to spell the word, but, FYI, the language you heard spoken in The Passion was mostly Aramaic.
364778
NO\n\nIt was the day of Pentecost 33 C.E. Weeks earlier, Jews and proselytes from at least 15 regions of the far-flung Roman Empire and beyond had packed Jerusalem to celebrate the Passover. On that day, thousands of them heard—not in confusion, as those at ancient Babel did, but with understanding—ordinary people filled with holy spirit proclaim the good news in numerous languages spoken in the empire. \n\nJesus’ disciples could probably speak common Greek, the popular language of the day. They also used Hebrew, the language spoken at the temple. However, on that Pentecost day, they “astonished” their diverse audience by speaking in the native languages of those people. The hearts of the listeners were touched by the vital truths that they heard in their mother tongue.\n\nAmong those ‘speaking in tongues’ today are Pentecostals and Baptists, also Roman Catholics, Episcopalians, Methodists, Lutherans, and Presbyterians. Jesus said that the holy spirit would ‘guide his disciples into all the truth.’ (John 16:13) Do the members of each of these religions believe that the others who also “speak in tongues” have been guided into “all the truth”? How could that be, since they are not all in agreement? What spirit is making it possible for them to “speak in tongues”?\nIn the first century, when Christians ‘spoke in tongues,’ what they said had meaning to people who knew those languages. (Acts 2:4, 8) Today, is it not true that ‘speaking in tongues’ usually involves an ecstatic outburst of unintelligible sounds?\n\nIn the first century, the Bible shows, congregations were to limit the ‘speaking in tongues’ to two or three persons who might do that at any given meeting; they were to do it “each in turn,” and if there was no interpreter present they were to keep silent. (1 Cor. 14:27, 28, RS) Is that what is being done today?\n\nThe Bible does indicate how long the ‘gift of tongues’ would be a part of Christian experience. According to the record, this gift and the other gifts of the spirit were always conveyed to persons by the laying on of hands of the apostles of Jesus Christ or in their presence. Thus, after their death and when the individuals who in that way had received the gifts died, the miraculous gifts resulting from the operation of God’s spirit must have come to their end. Such a view agrees with the purpose of those gifts as stated at Hebrews 2:2-4.
126346
I don't remember reading that, but if you want to look for yourself, here's a GREAT website:  www.biblegateway.net.  totally searchable in lots of versions and languages.  (by the way, I typed Jesus and hell into the search and came up empty, to save you some time)
908735
The word itself couldnt have been used, because the language itself didnt even exist until after Jesus.\n\nGo, learn history...
1038002
I would if I could understand your question. What language are you talking, Martian?
826223
Hello Friend.. :)\n\nHere is God's message to you.. :)\n\nhttp://fathersloveletter.com/fllnarration.html\n\n\nIn Jesus Most Precious Name..\nWith Love..In Christ.. :)
405571
Check out Matthew 16:13-17:\n\nWhen Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, "Who do people say that the Son of Man is [I am]?"\n    "Well," they replied, "some say John the Baptist, some say Elijah, and others say Jeremiah or one of the other prophets."\n\n    Then he asked them, "Who do you say I am?"\n\n    Simon Peter answered, "You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God."\n\n    Jesus replied, "You are blessed, Simon son of John, because my Father in heaven has revealed this to you. You did not learn this from any human being..."\n\nJesus pretty much told Peter that he was correct when he said that He was the Son of God.\n\nHere is another scripture:\n\nLuke 9:18-20 (similar to the previous one)
537342
Yes.\n\nIn Wales about 15% of the population speak Welsh as a first or equal first language.  Most scoolchildren in Wales have to learn Welsh.\n\nIn Ireland, Irish Gaelic is spoken - particularly in the Western areas.\n\nIn Brittany (North Western France), Breton is spoken by a sizeable minority as a first language alongside French.\n\nIn Scotland - paricularly the Western Isles and Western Highlands - Scots Gaelic is spoken by a - diminishing - minority.\n\nManx is surviving as a second (learned) language but has no real mother tongue speakers on the Isle of Man.\nThe same applies to Cornish.\n\nCumbrian is to all intents and purposes extinct and survives in a few ancient texts only.\n\nNumerous other celtic languages - from as far afield as present-day Turkey and Spain are long dead.\n\n'Britain' is a celtic name from the original celtic (sometimes referred to as British) language spoken throughout the British Isles before the Roman conquest in the first century A.D.
511215
Which language it is? please specify.
722971
hmmm...yes??? ummmm....no???? maybe??? I guess it would help I if I could read the language!
98839
An Aramaic scholar tells me that nowhere in the original texts of the Bible [written in Aramaic, soon after Jesus was crucified] was it mentioned that Jesus [or anyone else, for that matter !] said that he is the Son of God.\n...Jesus actually said 'WE are the CHILDREN of God' - to imply that all human beings are equal in God's eyes.\n...But in subsequent translations, the intepreters [who already had the setting-up of a powerful religion in their minds] conveniently changed Jesus' statement from the plural to the singular. And [male chauvinists, all !] corrected the gender-neutral 'children' into 'son(s)' as well !\n...If we take Jesus' own words [spoken in Aramaic] into account, then all of humanity [including Jesus !] will be children of God.\n...But, several people [including even some christians] found it [and still find it] difficult to digest the mis-translated statement that Jesus himself claimed that he alone was the 'son of God' !\n...From the overall image that one has of Jesus, he comes through as a thorough gentleman - who cannot really be associated with mouthing such 'tall claims' !\nThose are the handiwork of Jesus' 2nd, 3rd and 4th generations of 'followers' - who needed such crudities as 'prop's for their 'campaigns' !
904239
I am very surprised that this had no replies before me!\nI probably am not the best person to answer as Im not particularly religious.  I was brought up attending church but to me Jesus is pretty much just a fictional character in a very old book ( that probably wasnt translated very accurately anyway!)...;