How the President can rectify his mistakes so that his party wins back office the next Presidential elections?
457260
Restoring the thousands of military and civilian dead and maimed to their families in the US, and the Allied countries would be a start.\n  \nAs the Congress pointed out during the Clinton era lying to the American people is not a mistake. GWB was deceitful in running for office as a fiscal conservative, and has lied to us about what he knew and when he knew it in the prelude to Katrina.\n  \nThe British memos have confirmed the allegations of Clarke, Wilson, et al that a case for war with Iraq had to be made at any cost.  So far that cost is the bankrupting of the country, and the death of about 2300 Americans, 207 Allied forces, the maiming of thousands more.\n  \nI'm tired of hearing "He's made some mistakes." "Mistakes" are made adding a column of figures and mispronouncing nucLEar. GWB's errors are monumental blunders, and reckless judgment lapses. \n\nHe can't rectify his "mistakes"
443231
Do you mean how to restore them in general?  Vote the republicans out.  \n\nIf you mean your individuals right, you have to explain why you lost them.  Ex-felon, or some other reason?
616312
Once upon a time... there was this guy who was the president. While president, he got caught with his pants down and lied to try and save face. \n Now the opposing party knew this was the big break they had been looking for. One of the members boasted, "we could put a monkey in office now". And that is exactly what they did. \nThe End
1156588
First, you have to get him to join the Republican party. Then, you move him to Texas and run him for president. Just look at the dildo in the White House for proof.
605230
Getting caught \nHe should have had a buffer between him and the controversy \nand a patsy to blame it on.\nAbove all he should have not got involved and betrayed the voters that put him in office.
1110959
The only thing that will bring back decisive elections, would be a very charismatic strong candidate.  The last couple of elections have been full of mediocre candidates who think that charisma is a cheese.\n\nI hope that candidate comes forward soon, cuz these guys suck.
18333
never... people in general are too stupid to realize what he's doing therefore he will gat the rest of his term in office
869939
DO NOT elect the ones that play dirty\n\nmaybe after a few elections they will learn
692385
Inform yourself, get involved at the precinct level, probably best with a party, work hard, get elected, and always remember why you did this.  \n\nListen to your constituents, but vote your conscience after evaluating all you've researched and heard. \n\nGet elected again, this time to higher office as many times as it takes to achieve your purpose.  Then leave office, like Cincinnatus.
366955
There is no provision in the Constitution for a recall of the President.  The only recourse against a President is impeachment which is done by the Congress.  In order for the public to have the President removed, they would need to pressure their Congresspersons to impeach him.
840813
Go and vote democrat.  Then after we take back the congress they will start investigations of king bush and his cronies and put in some real election reform laws.
1076376
Sure, but first you have to convince the entire electorate not to support them. Incumbents typically have an 80%- 90% re-election rate.\n\nGood luck.
262043
Let it run its course.  Pay attention, and take good notes.  Prepare for the next presidential election.
280453
Simple: mid term elections.  Congressional candidates can distance themselves from the "president" if they think their constituents are unhappy with his performance.  If this is the case, the candidate can "promise" to help get the party back on track.
31515
Nagin's problem is going to be that all the people who move back in time for the next election are likely to be white Republicans. As far as I know, he hasn't broken any laws, so he can't be impeached. A recall election is a possibility, but with the city in as big a mess as it is, that possibility is very remote at best.\n\nI would be surprised if the even ran again, to tell you the truth.
945493
Unfortunately, even now they are not. Anyone can make mistakes. So, electing him first time is understandable. But re-electing him is shocking. Supporting him even now is completely beyond my grasp.
1051687
No he won't be lucky because he will inherit the mess from this one...he has to be pushed into a war and once the republicans are out of office they will go on the attack against him blaming him for everything and acting like they never did anything to contribute to the problem....then the democrats will pretty much do the same if they lose so I hope a completely differnt party wins...Im sick of Dems and Republicans...why don't we all just try something completely differnt this next election.