constitutional rights?
461368
yes please. demandes for everyone on earth.
128326
Yes, Americans must be allowed to have guns.  The reason this is a constitutional right is to insure that the government can never subject us to a dictatorship.  As American citizens we have the right to rise up with arms to overthrow any repressive government.  Did you not learn this in school?
106227
Gee, if there were only some kind of, oh I don't know, CONSTITUTION... or BILL OF RIGHTS.\nSeems like that would help.
776528
These are some of your rights if that is what you mean\n\n1.The First Amendment guarantees the freedom of worship, of speech, of the press, of assembly, and of petition to the government for redress of grievances.\n2.The right to bear arms openly–adopted with reference to state militias–is guaranteed by the Second Amendment\n3.The Fifth Amendment provides that no person shall be held for "a capital or otherwise infamous crime" without indictment, be twice put in "jeopardy of life or limb" for the same offense, be compelled to testify against himself, or "be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law."\n4.The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right of speedy and public trial by an impartial jury\n5.Seventh Amendment guarantees the right of trial by jury\n6.The Ninth Amendment states that "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."\n7.By the Tenth Amendment "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
1058941
Of course, first amendment rights.\nI Corinthians 13;8a, Love never fails!!!!!
191399
You  have every right to free speech.  Use that right often!\n\nHowever, you don't have a Constitutionally protected right to unrestricted use of Yahoo Answers.  It is their service and they offer it for public use UNDER THEIR TERMS AND CONDITIONS.  They have every right to call the shots in this specific forum.
279530
1. Guarantee to freedoms of speech, press, church, assembly and petition for redress of grievances.\n2. Right to keep and bear arms\n3. Forbids quartering of troops without owner's consent\n4. Forbids unlawful searches, seizures \n5. Freedom against self-incrimination.\n6. Right to speedy trial and confrontation of accusers/witnesses against\n7. Right to jury trial\n8. Forbids cruel and unusual punishment and forbids excessive bail\n9. Says rights enumerated are not all the rights retained by the people.\n10. Gives states rights.  That is the powers not given to the federal government by the constitution are vested in the states or in the people.
978017
right to run for presidency :)
588848
Do you mean Constitution? http://www.law.emory.edu/FEDERAL/usconst.html\n\nHere you are.\n\nHere's a better one: http://www.constitution.org/constit_.htm
810059
Rights of the people.
334684
Yes. And if you doubt that answer, ask people the following questions:\n\n1. What 5 rights are guaranteed by the 1st amendment (Speech, religion, petition the government, assemble, and press).\n\n2. What does the 10th amendment say?\n\nI doubt most people could get one right, much less two.
123214
i don't think there is one.   Just read it.  If this is for school, I would focus on the amendments.
5317
2 words buddy, John Locke. If you talk about Locke, and "The Rights of Man" you should be OK. Use Wikipedia, and look up his Second Treatise on Government.
715944
it's not, \n\nIf the ACLU or some real constitutional lawers would step up to the plate and challange it, we could get somewhere.  \n\nand for the guy who said we don't have a right to privacy, how about you read the bill of rights.  \n\n"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."\n\nso "sneek and peek" wouldn't exactly be constitutional.
1059478
anything that is in the constitution..........
593095
We don't have a right to bear arms.  Please re-read the text of the 2nd Ammendment!  No court has ever stated that the ordinary citizen has a right to bear arms, and virtually every gun control measure ever passed has been upheald by the courts.\n\nThe 2nd Ammendment gives the states the right to raise militias.  The militia is known today as the National Guard and the Air Guard.  These are state-controlled military forces under the command of the governors of each of the 50 states.\n\nAt the time of our nation's birth, military personnel, the state militiamen in particular, were responsible for providing their own weapons.  (There was gun-control even then as only free white men were permitted to own arms.  Women, slaves, black freedmen (freed slaves) and native persons were not allowed this right in most states.)\n\nThe 2nd Ammendment only guarantees that the federal government cannot disarm the state militias.  Nothing more!\n\nIf you think that you have an inherent right to bear arms, try moving to New York City and telling the police that as they haul you off to Rikers Island.\n\nPlease don't confuse me with some anti-gun looney.  Far from it.  As a veteran of 21 years of military service, and an expert marksman, I know my way around the armory.  \n\nHowever, I do NOT support the open and completely unrestricted "right" to carry or own any and all weapons any more than I think that drivers license and vehicle registration laws should be scrapped.\n\nI DO believe that anyone who wishes to own or carry should be permitted to so do upon completion of training and licensing, much as is done in the states that have "concealed carry" laws on the books.  \n\nConsider that the military does not permit its personnel to carry weapons of any type until they are fully trained and have demonstrated competency in their handling, care and use.  And nobody is more anal about storing and controlling access to weapons than the military -- and that's as it should be!
116614
Your rights are not dependant on the Constitution but predate it in Common Law.  The Constitution is specifically about creating a general government for the States.  \n\nThe Bill of rights is not a list of personal rights (refer to Article IX of the Amendments).  The first eight articles are statements excluding the federal (general) government from doing specific things.  The last two are declaratory statements of basic truths in part underscoring the fact that individual rights are to numerous too list.\n\nRead Thomas Jefferson’s Kentucky Resolution, preferably his first draft. \n\nBy the way the Constitution of the United States is not long, it is only seven Articles of which the longest only has 10 Sections.  It is written in clear, easy to understand English.