peoplesoft functional?
469781
Yes, both the Company and the Software are both completely functional.\n\nOracle completed the acquisition of PeopleSoft in 2005
11525
Salesforce.com has a free evaluation version of their software.  After the trial, you'll still be able to use minimal features, which should be good enough for a small business.  Might have changed, but it was true when I tried it a few months back.
898263
Try this website:\nhttp://www.systransoft.com/index.html
1041779
Yes it is still functional.\n\nTry http://www.msn.com
982738
My experience is fairly much the same as yours. Are we just weary or is Database really difficult, or at least more difficult than the other modules. Perhaps a bit of both.\nIt will be interesting to see what other people think...
676348
Your program is only a good as the documentation. Your program may be a work of art, but if it is not documented properly, then it will not achieve it's full potential. It is the same with any system design.  If it is not documented properly, or is not worded in plain english, then\nthe entire system suffers.
168991
I am assuming you are the one asking the questions.  I have found that the biggest failing database developers have is not using the resources available for code samples. \n\nQ:  Where would you turn for help with creating a stored procedure or a select statement that was erroring out?
1049182
found on on metalink it says that version 9.4.2 has not been supported since 1997.  10.5 and 10.6 have not been supported since 2001.  10.7 not supported since 2003.\nIt looks like 11i is the only currently supported product and 11i.10 is the current version.\n\n11i has been around long enough that there are desupport notices for some of the earliest 11i releases.  That's rare for Oracle, usually they support the current major release.  I expect a new major release of the Applications to go along with 10g prety soon.  It'll probably be hinted at or announced at the next AppsWorld\n\nAlso 11i refers to the Oracle Applications - a suite of financial, human resources, manufacturing, and and accounting applications, not a database.  The differences between 9i and 10g can be found here:\n\nhttp://otn.oracle.com/pls/db10g/db10g.show_toc\n\nAlso found on on metalink it says that version 9.4.2 has not been supported since 1997.  10.5 and 10.6 have not been supported since 2001.  10.7 not supported since 2003.\nIt looks like 11i is the only currently supported product and 11i.10 is the current version.\n \n11i has been around long enough that there are desupport notices for some of the earliest 11i releases.  That's rare for Oracle, usually they support the current major release.  I expect a new major release of the Applications to go along with 10g prety soon.  It'll probably be hinted at or announced at the next AppsWorld.\n\n Oracle 10g (like all Oracle releases) has heaps of features - most of which you don't care about. The thing Oracle hangs it hat on with 10g is Grid computing. I'm not using it so I don't care.\n\nIf you are a DBA, there's probably a lot of stuff in the new features guide that will interest you. As a developer / software designer using a non-Oracle front-end, the bits that interest me are:\n- Extensions to the MERGE statement\n- Extensions to CONNECT BY functionality\n- The MODEL clause\n- Table compression\n- Improved support for partitioned IOTs\n- A new front-end web deployment tool called Oracle HTML DB\n\nFor the nuts&bolts programmer, 10g is a bit of a disappointment after such things as:\n- PL/SQL (6)\n- Cost Based Optimizer, Stored Procs/Funcs/Triggers, Hash joins / Anti-joins, Bitmap indexes, MViews (7.x)\n- Partitioned tables, Object Relational features(8.x)\n- ANSI compliant SQL, MERGE statement, multi-table INSERT (9)\n\nI've been using 10g (rel1) for about 8 months. I've found fewer bugs than in first releases of previous major versions, but it's not exactly NASA-rated. Hopefully 10.2 is a bit more stable
708972
Depends what configuration you have... If you're running on a lower performance computer and you have a lot of apps installed, it will take a while untill the list is filled (it could last a few minutes)...(On my old Duron 700Mhz with 256ram  i had oracle 9i installed and working:D, .NET 2001 and other programming stuff and it took me 5 minutes as I remember until that list was "filled"...).
600864
Do you get a blue screen saying anything? Sounds like a driver or IRQL mix-up. Any recent changes? Did you run a good anti-virus prog like AVG 7.1? Need more info to help you.
404062
(m)\n\ngoto the following link for logic sql commands\n\nhttp://docs.hp.com/cgi-bin/doc3k/B3060190208.12319/75
293894
Since mysql, Oracle, DB2 and Microsoft all offer free versions of their databases I am not sure who would pay money for a database.  Try selling something else.
388709
Yes, it is available, but as I can see, only in Developer Suite package.\n\nOn attached page there is a section "Oracle Developer Suite 10g (9.0.4)".\nI think it's what you need.\n\nBut as for me, better decision will be using the latest version of product, which is Oracle Developer Suite 10g (10.1.2.0.2).\n\nBTW, to download it, you must be a member of Oracle Technology Network. Became a member, if you don't yet. It's free and very helpful.
705509
You need to identify your database requirements.  Simply moving to a proper relational database is likely the right move, but you might want to identify the restrictions around your choice:\n\n- operating system\n- programming environment (what will apps be written in)\n- price\n- volume of data\n- amount of concurrent users\n- level of database administration required\n- synchronization/replication\n- availability of help (online communities, etc...)\n\nFor my money, I would start of trying either:\n\n- Postgres\n- MySQL\n- SQL Anywhere Studio - Developer Edition\n\nThe latter is a great commercial-product choice because of the low cost of both licensing and of support, plus it has one of the best online communities going (the newsgroup "sybase.public.sqlanywhere.general" and other "sybase.public.sqlanywhere.*" newsgroups)\n\nLinks below should help.
1158830
In a word: yes\n\nif you have an familiarity with ms-sql 2000 using the built in reporting services, and as you're familiar with crystal reports, you'll discover that the reporting services within ms-sql 2005 with the included reporting services has quite a few more features.\n\nRealize though that the reporting server/services defaults to C# pages; so there isn't really much of a difference; as you'll be dealing with a programming language of some sort, rather than having the actual database perform the functions which will create the reports...\n\nif i may suggest.\n\nAs you're already using stored procedures, why not expand the power of sql (as long as the flavour is at least 2k SP2), and have it create the reports directly with a few triggers defined by the dynamic pages in whatever flavour language you prefer?\n\nThe reporting server/services when installed, generates a slew of directories, pages, and control (behind code pages) defaulting to C# asp.NET 2.0 pages.\n\nif you are curious, i recommend downloading MS-SQL 2005 Express and install it. You'll be able to apply it to any website located currently within your development/staging environment and test it directly without interfering with your currently deployed applications.\n\nPersonally if it were me. I'd likely avoid the management of a database conversion of parameter values via a scripting language, and just have the database do what it's meant to do. After all, most dbase enterprise systems have intergrated capabilities to produce reports in a variety of methods (w/ my preference being xml/xsl display, leaving me the option to display within any environment in any codebase).
159342
The best for enterprise is Oracle 10g, ighly reliable, fast,scaleable. MySQl for open source, nice easy and free of charge.
691193
Hi .. \n\ni guess the following page can reslove your issue\nhttp://www.phpfreaks.com/postgresqlmanual/