tell me about Mac using Intel duo core processor? it is better than previous?
471297
It has the obvious advantage of being much faster.  But also, it will help that Intel develops new and improved hardware at a much faster rate and at considerably less cost than Motorola ever did, thereby giving you greater performance at a lower cost.  Possible disadvantages could be that BIOS chips that operate with the Intel processor will still not be updated, but we can hope that Macintosh will continue to maintain its high standards of hardware.\nBecause Intel is using x86 type processors it's possible that we will see generations of Macintoshes running Windows instead of Mac OSX. On the other hand, it may give Mac OSX greater popularity, now that some of the first MacBooks can dual boot into Windows XP, because it will give users a bit more opportunity to get over the learning curve of switching operating systems.  We will just have to wait and see.
1160623
Yes they run pretty good, not has fast has the Intel Core Duo but its not much of a difference if you don't run multiple programs at once. Also they consume a lot less power so your battery life can last much more, like 2 hours more then the Core Duo.
432898
Core duo has two processing cores which makes it faster - can handle more instructions. Centrino being older is slower and was kind of a bundle deal where if it said centrino it had to have wireless access (not the cpu - the computer)
554774
i tryed to send you a email but some how it did not go through so i am "answering" here. you are very ignorant about macs. i have worked with a lot of pcs both fast and slow, and never had any thing but problems with them. all pcs are junk compared to macs. macs never get viruses, have the best hardware in the world, and have been rated the best computer of any price. they last long, have all good software, pcs have a lot more software but most of it is junk and if you got rid of all the bad stuff there would be less for pc than theere is for mac. i know what a good computer is and you dont. i will never use a pc again. my mac is the best computer i have ever had, and when i need a new computer i will get a mac. PCs STINK.
783489
Forget the Intel "Core 2 Duo" and look instead to those using the new AMD Turion. If you have the money, have a look at the new Alienware notebooks - Mac has NOTHING which even scratches the surface on these bad-boys (esp if you opt for the 1GB of graphics memory) ...you'll never look back
14669
it will never come out, coz Apple is now underway transiting from choosing PowerPC (G3, G4, G5) as cpus for the new macs to Intel. also, "G5 mobile" is a kinda "non-existent" coz IBM/Freescale has no intention from day 1 in releasing G5 mobile according to recent reports.\n\nthe first Intel based mac will be released by June 2006 according to Steve jobs in his earlier keynote speech, CEO of Apple.
78221
There reallyisn't any known disadvantages yet.  Do you know anyone that has one.  But honestly, I think that intel makes good chips.  At least in a mac they will be able to run better without crashing as much.  \nBut you always take a risk when you are the first person to buy something.
352223
Mac is the future\n\ni also have an iBook G4 - its a 1.2ghz\n\nmy house has:\n3x iBook G4\n1x PowerMac G5 Dual\n1x iMac G4\n1x Cube G4\n\nSoon to have:\niMac Core Duo\nMacBook Pro
660921
Acutally, Intel Core Duo ONLY refers to the dual core Centrino systems with a Intel "Yonah" Processor, Intel 945 express chipset, and Intel Pro/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection. (I'm pretty sure that the laptop can still be called "Core Duo" if the wireless card is replaced with a similiar non-Intel-brand one.)\n\nThe processor speed is the maximum non-overclocked speed at which EACH processor runs. Although there are two processors, you'll never get close to doubling the speed of a single processor. Practical gaming, business, and synthesis benchmarks show that average improvement in using 2 processors is anywhere from 0-30%. Multithreaded processes will see more benefit.
532090
I'm not the most proficient Mac user but if your looking for basic fulfillment of your needs then a Mac Mini or the basic iMac will fit the bill. I'd go with the iMac personally. but for the best quality and efficiency the Power Mac G5 is the best choice.\n\nHowever, now that Intel is starting to create better processors that aren't just faster but are more reliable and windows has a Media Center Spec. O/S, I would seriously look into an Intel OR AMD based media center PC.\n\nThe macs I mentioned go for between $600-$1300 (USD)\n\nAnd the Intel's, depending on Configuration, can go anywhere from $700-$1500 (USD) for a decent configuration.\n\nPersonally I choose Windows over Mac because for components within a computer it is much more compatible. the Apple O/S stalemates you to just a few options that can limit productivity. but it can really fall on personal preference.\n\nMy second source will bring you to a very good PC that is based on an Intel chip set and can run Windows Media Center 2005. it goes for $690 (USD) not including tax and shipping and handling.
996570
Macs are great I tell you.\n\nI have been using Mac for more than 12 years now. For the last 3 years I've also been using a PC (w/ windows OS) only because of some softwares I like that aren't available for Mac OS. But I would always prefer using a Mac anytime anywhere. One more thing besides the fabulous Mac OS, Mac hardwares are very reliable and durable.\n\nI would recommend any of the new MACs with Intel core duo processors for the applications you are using:\n\nfor laptop try the Macbooks:\nhttp://www.apple.com/macbookpro/\nhttp://www.apple.com/macbook/macbook.html\n\n\nfor desktop try the iMacs:\nhttp://www.apple.com/imac/\n\n____________________________________________________\nRead the following news item:\n\nApple technology brings World Cup updates to millions\nBy Jim Dalrymple\n\nChances are if you’re watching highlights from the FIFA World Cup matches on television, you are seeing Apple technology hard at work. Highlights from the world’s most popular sport are being prepared using multiple Apple products and technologies.\n\nThe biggest of the television networks using Apple products is the Host Broadcast Service (HBS), which is a collection of production groups brought together specifically for the 2006 World Cup. From its master control center to the dozens of cameras at each match, the production team is responsible for everything from managing the feeds coming back to the Munich headquarters to quickly delivering highlights to mobile phones within minutes of the action happening on the field. ....\n\nREAD MORE HERE:  http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/06/22/worldcup/index.php
942324
Problem with core processors is very little applications take advantage of the multi cores. Yes, it is faster then the regular core duo. I don't remember the speeds check out http://tomshardware.com for reviews perhaps they did one on this.
1111388
macbook pro has 2.16 Ghz but 2 gb ram 120 gig hd. and built in camera. pretty damn expensive though
850686
apple dual core, 2 operating systems for the price of one, has many cool features. handles high end design programs without a hitch.
13433
Apple announced they will start to release new systems based on Intel processors in mid-2006.\n\nhttp://www.apple.com/pr/library/2005/jun/06intel.html
734635
I recently bought a refubrished Apple Powerbook G4. I love it. It have a 15 inch screen. Supports 2gb memory. Has a independent 64mb graphics card. 80gb HD.Great battery life I would suggest the new MacBook which runs windows+mac.
947816
Macs are definitely a better machine if you look at the technical specs.  Esp. the new MacPro Books, they have dual Xeon Core Processors (the ones found in servers!!!).  Also they offer up to 16 GB of memory, for a laptop that is amazing!  But it all depends on what you want to use your machine for.  If you need to crunch numbers and process spreadsheet and data warehousing PCs are for you.  If you want a machine that runs beautifully and so smoothly like for Video artists, Musicians, and anybody who can appreciate a piece of technology that is also dually a piece of art than the Mac is for you.  One last thing to get really hooked up the MacPro Books (I mean Bluetooth keyboard, mouse, 23" HD panel, 16 GB RAM, 500 GB harddrive space, and the works)  you will have to spend about $5,900.  PCs are much cheaper, but if you look at the specs you will see why!