The definitions of l/hold f/hold restrictive covs adverse poss delaps in regards to land and property?
457529
Have a look at this webpage I uploaded a few days ago - it has hundreds of definitions of terminology used in real estate and financial services... http://profend.com/answers/financialterminology.html
2635
http://www.t-tlaw.com/fin-04.htm
30577
4-1.15. Safekeeping Property\n \nSee link below.
741417
Not community property: any asset or debt that the individual had before the marriage.\n\nCommunity property: any asset or debt by EITHER PARTY that has accumulated during the marriage.\n\nThat means that, under California law,  everything gets split down the middle, regardless of whether you kept "separate accounts" or not. All the furniture, services, etc. and any bank accounts , though you think are "yours" or "his", technically you each own half of each other's stuff.\n\nAs for the debt, he's on the hook for half of it. It was a debt incurred while you were married.\n\nLikewise, you are entitled to half his retirement money accumulated during the marriage, he is entitled to half of what you've accumulated.\n\nHence, the need of an attorney for you two to negotiate who gets what.\n\nMy parents got divorced in Wisconsin, also a community property state. My mom would have had to give half her IRA to my dad, the deadbeat that he was, if the attorney hadn't worked out a compromise.\n\nThe reason behind community property law was that women frequently got scr_wed at the time of the divorce. The man usually made more money, including retirement money, and the wife wouldn't get at it unless successful in suing the husband in court. Since the man had deeper pockets, he could get a better attorney, putting the wife at a disadvantage.
1178531
The rules are complex, and violation of the rules carry some harsh penalties. I would suggest you consult with a competent securities lawyer in FL.\n\nThe link below provides some basic information from the SEC.
648984
There are a lot of variables, but unless they violated the terms of the trust they cannot be held liable.  Also, making reasonable investments (which turn out to fail) doesn't rise to violating investment terms.
521478
Unfortunately, you can only roll it over into another investment property (Like-kind exchange)  Applying it to your residence will not work.  You have sixty days (before or after the closing) to identify another property and 180 days to close on it.  If you held the property for investment (say yes) and held if for over 12 months, you will pay tax on it at the lower capital gains rates. If you held it for less than 12 months, it is considered ordinary income and is taxed at your regular rate.  If it is less than a year, see if the buyer will wait until the year is up.  Give them soem money back at closing to compensate them for waiting.  It could be worth your while.  To see what the tax might be, use your tax software to estimate what your tax would be.  Sorry to hear about the medical problem, I hope everything works out.  Also, ANY profit is a good profit!!!!!
404659
What you are referring to is adverse posession, which is part of common law and thus exists in all of the common law states. Giving you the exact details of the laws in all of the states would be time consuming, so if you give me the state you're in, I can get you more detailed information. The long and short of it is that in order to claim adverse posession, you must have "actual, visible, hostile, notorious, exclusive, and continuous possession of the property" for a certain length of time, depending on the state, and in some states make a claim of right to the land.\n\nEdit:\nIn Arizona, adverse possession requires 3 years if under title or color of title, 5 years if recorded in a deed and paying taxes on the land, but without title, and 10 years if you are simply using the land, and it cannot be more than 160 acres. In Colorado, there is an absolute limit of 18 years, but the law is somewhat more complex than in Arizona. See the last link below.
788676
Look on the right for index area and keep narrowing it down.\nStalking, assault, theft and robbery.\n Hope it helps.\nMan, sombody's in deep doo doo.
165628
Federal Offence on federal property.  State offence otherwise.\n\nThis is my field of work.
1038556
Alice, you are going down the rabbit hole!\nIn a nutshell, there is a law that could be used to get anyone but the Rockefellers themselves out of a home/ off of land etc. they own. You aren't inquiring about real estate, you are neck deep in politics on local, State and Federal levels. So here's the worst case. A citizen can't own real estate in the USA. The best case is, a citizen can pay for real estate in the USA. Actuality/Reality falls to either side of the middle on a per case basis.\nMain concers Federally now are hydrological. Contaminated (defined by Clean Water Act standards et al) water from your property cannot mingle with natural runoff. However, Farmers seem to be exempt from this in the recent cases in Columbus, Ohio, where public water was under toxic advisories due to fertilizer runoff. I guess "if everybody is doing it" it isn't unlawful to poison the public water supply....\nOn the other hand, an egg farmer in Ohio has faced years constant Federal litigation and multiple fines for chicken farming runoff into a non contributing (to public water supply) stream. \nI don't know what your intentions are, but if you have a life to devote to these issues, you will resolve that laws are selectively enforced, which is the real issue or theme of you querry as I see it.\nWith respect to land development, Clean Water Act standards are the sword over the involved parties heads at the negotiating table. Hydrological studies by competent parties are scutinized on both the sellers side and the buyers side and some large deals are pending elections. \nClinton enacted The Clean Water Act so we can deduce what is good for business....\n\nWith regards to drug laws and real estate. Feds have carte blanche. Even large sums of cash on hand can allow for land/property siezure. \nbuzzflash.com (watchdog journalism Homeland security legislation pertaining to land use/rights)\ntheforbiddenknowlge.com (has some useful links pertaining to Federal/international real estate legislation)\n\nYou are going to be busy for awhile.....
168804
Actually, nearly every state has laws that govern a legal concept called "adverse possession".  Adverse possession is a legally recognized way to gain title to someone elses land over time.\n\nThe requirements are very strict in most states, but it usually involves an "open and notorioius" possession of the land by the "squatter" to the exclusion of the owner over a period of years.  The number of years is a matter of state law.  Some states, like California, also require the squatter to pay the property taxes during the period of possession.  If you meet those requirements, you may still need to file a quiet title lawsuit to get legal title to the property.  You need to consult an attorney in your state for further information.\n\nThis concept is completely different from the idea of purchase property at a tax lien sale.  Both exist in most states.
295114
Adverse possession means openly holding property adverse to the interests of the owner for a period of years, sometimes as long as 20.\n\nIf the owner knows and approves of your use of the property, possession is not adverse.\n\nIf the owner does not and could not know of your use, possession is not adverse.\n\nIf you have not been in possession adversely for years and years, possession is not adverse.\n\nIt's basically really hard to do.
918993
This is referring to the rights of property owners concerning property adjacent to (abutting) theirs.  There are certain things that a person can do to infringe on the rights of his neighbors, i.e. loud parties, overhanging trees, dangerous contaminants that could seep over to adjoining properties, etc.
920284
me: land owner ( currently 200 acres ) and been through this many times with people, developments etc.\n\nYou'll need to talk to the council first. That is talk, don't send them a letter.\n\nMake an appointment with the forward planning officer to see if this parcel has any chance of being in the local development framework. Expressions of interest for LDF's closed in April this year, until 2018 so its going to have to be  apretty special case to get a permanent residence on it.\n\nThe facts that you choose a lob cabin, are down on your luck, want to live in harmony etc...bare no weight with planning, and neither should they.\n\nKennels can count as agricultural use ( sometimes ) , so you might try to go for an agricultrural accupancy condition, or a no-freehold transfer covernent.. These might help the council believe you are not going to move on and make moeny from it.\n\nEnvironment agency would have something to say as well, you'll need to be able to proove you have waste disposal. A septic tank, cesstank etc are the last resort and if possible they will amke you connect to mains drainage, even if its 100's metres away. They normally accept its not preactical if its going to cost more than £40K, but you might still have to spend £15K on a biodisc and reed bed. they would also have concerns about waste from the kennels if you are not on mains disposal.\n\nTalk to forward planning first. If they say its got a chance, you then need to go for change of use to residential and then outline planning. Once you've got that there is then the building regs.\n\nThe statement below...".....you can pretty much do as you please" is complete nonsense. The fine for illegal construction on agricultural land can be up to £50K for a single dwelling,in addition to being told to remove it.
161535
The phrase is adverse possession.  It is, in general simple terms, the principle that if someone exercises rights over a property for a long time, it becomes thiers.  \n\nThe law is different in different states, and complicated.  If you didn't know that the fence line was in the wrong place, it may well not be adverse possession.\n\nI know there are lots of clinics set up to help people with property issues in NYC.  Perhaps you can consult one of those if you don't want to consult a private lawyer.  (I knew someone who found help that way, and found the place through her congressman.)\n\nBut I recommend waiting until she has her survey done before you take irreversible action.
1002653
I wouldn't characterize current capital gain rates as "huge" in any case.  However, you may have some gain that is not eligible for capital gain rates.\n\nThe traditional way of deferring gain from disposition of real estate is to arrange a like-kind exchange.  For example, if you want to reinvest your sale proceeds in another property, you can arrange for an intermediary to purchase the other property, then trade it to you for the property you are disposing of.\n\nYou should consult a qualified advisor for more complete advice.