Sean Hannity and Alan Combes Question?
461064
If you think Hannity is honest, I have a piece of land in Timbucktoo to sell ya. \n\nWhat Hannity is good at is dismissing facts, attacking the messenger, cutting off and redirecting his guests if they disagree with him, and he has total disregard for honesty. \n\nExamples...See what he said about the Abner Louima Case, you know, the guy that was sodomized by NYPD officers. Hannity said he fabricated the story and his claims of being sodomized by the officers was really from gay sex. Guess who confessed to what Mr. Louima claimed they did. Yup, the officers who committed this heinous crime. Did Hannity apologize? Uh, nope. \n\nHannity was spouting on his talk radio show that "liberal anti-war protestors" were heckling families of fallen veterans at funeral processions. He cherry picked local news reports to support the charge. Guess who was/is responsible for heckling the families?? Anti-gay protestors from Westboro Baptist Church. Did Hannity fess up and apologize?? Uh, nope. \n\nHannity's quotes about the Kosovo intervention when Clinton was president...\n\n"There's no exit strategy."\n"We've hurt the people we're trying to help."\n\nHe threw criticisms left and right at Clinton.\n\nWhat war does that sound like?? \n\nWhat does he say about Iraq? He frequently criticizes opponents of the Iraq war for undermining the war effort and giving strength to our enemies. \n\nThat's just a tidbit of what Hannity is really like. Honest?? Hannity is the farthest thing from being honest. Vote for him for president? That would be insane.
600009
What is the question here? All I see is a lame-as sed rant about what you PERCEIVE to be true about the White House. I guarantee you there are a number of people on a daily basis saying "no". I haven't seen anyone get their head lopped off. And seriously, are you suggesting that it wasn't time for a new director of the CIA? LMAO. Get a clue.
1111757
That would be "Air America" the liberals answer to Rush, Hannity and the vast right wing conspiracy on the radio.  I don't know if they are all lazy, but they are broke and do have quite a few unedcuated types on board.  Pretty darn said.\n\nThe anti Bush radical get their information from thin air....obviously they don't use facts.
448473
I love this guy! The conservatives have been a little tricky on these pages the last few days man. For some reason they don't like people illustrating the truth to other Americans. So since Bush's, Brian Doyle the (Chester Molester) was implementing the Patriot Act on his 14 year old girl suspect, inside of the United States of America. I think that Nixon taking his punishment like a man, makes him look like ST. Michael.
387125
So many douches so little time...\n\nI have to laugh at the votes for Michael Moore - don't ya'll do *any* research at all?  If you did, you'd know that UNlike O'LIEly and Inshanity, (sorry couldn't resist) Moore has *your* best interests at heart AND his material is based in fact, not whitebread/fascist/racist fantasy...\n\nBut since you are asking about douche bags, surely you meant to include the women?  Ann Coulter and Michelle what's her name...?Malkin - try out to out-douche each other all the time.\n\nIn a way, you can't blame these HIGHLY PAID BABYSITTERS FOR THE RIGHT:  All they have to do is spout what these zealots want to hear and the networks will pay them nicely for getting the 'bots to tune in - and consume, consume, consume...
1148695
I answered a question today where a liberal is calling for the death of Ann Coulter.  There have been other questions posted on here where people have asked why isn't Bush dead yet.  A democrat said that Bush should be shot between the eyes on national tv.  There is plenty of hate and vitriol from the left.  The problem is that you agree with it so you don't see it as hate.\n\nEDIT: The "you" is the left or liberals.  If you are offended that I lumped everyone together then maybe you shouldn't do it yourself.  You labeled every single conservative as morally bankrupt.  If you can't take it don't dish it out.
387640
There's no chance he will step down because it appears that legally he will be able to fight off the charges. It doesn't matter how many times he lies or distorts his statements to the public if he is not under oath.\nThe public should demand that his administration come clean on everything and not stand for any more distortions. Remember when he said he would not wiretap without warrants? Remember when he said the leakers would be dealt with?\nSean Hannity is trying to get out the far right vote in November because he fears that a democratic congress would impeach Bush. By implication, a Republican congress will not, regardless of what Bush does.\nAll I'm hoping for is that the media, the public, and congress will be more skeptical and that his seemingly unlimited grasp for power will be curtailed until we can elect someone else. The public in general is finally coming around; congress at least is no longer a monolithic force; but most of the media still love to spout the administration's talking points. Time for people everywhere to challenge the administration's assertions.
1013076
Do you have to make this sooooo hard?\n\nUm, Bush. No, wait, I mean Cheney. Or maybe Frist. Definitely Rove. Or DeLay. Ann Coulter? Too obvious. Rush Limbaugh getting busted with his Viagra? Things that make you go hmmm. \n\nDamn.\n\nI'll play this like Trivial Pursuit & go with my first instinct: \n\nBu$h.
819560
I asked a fellow attorney today if the ACLU would be defending that father of 5 out in CO who got ratted out on by the drug-dealing prostitute.  \n\nInterestingly, he dissed the ACLU (a first), so I think the DNC is distancing themselves...
541661
Not a shred of proof?  Where the h&ll have you been the last 3 years??!  Wathcing Fox News and nothing else??  \n\nNeither Bushie nor Rummy would know the truth if it bit them in the @ss.\n\nNo sense showing the Mona Lisa to a blind man, I guess...\n\nBTW, life-long Repubican here, until about 4 years ago...  No party affilliation now...
1033130
To Loubean: He ain't in Afghanistan, he's in Pakistan. Where were you? Watching Faux News, probably.\n\nTo bungiebabe: Since when do we care about what other countries say? We're America, dammit! So you'd stand back and let Osama strike us again just 'cause another country is hiding them and calls invasion a "no no"? But if Clinton or another so-called "socialist" put the safety of our country before the rules, you'd call him reckless. \n\nThe Cancervative Party, none for all and all for the rich! Ain't ya proud to be an American?
1085577
OMG, Ms.I'm-more-righteous-than-the-freakin'-pope Ann Coulter is defending Limbaugh!? Despite the fact that they share the same racist Conservative values, I'd think Ms. Holier-Than-Thow would be only TOO quick to make a mockery of the man. But she's defending  him?! This can only mean one thing: Who was the blue pill for? Hmm...\n\n"Coulter and Limbaugh sittin in a tree..."
407232
I really like "SUPPORT DENMARK'S" remarks man! You are aware this kid is from Northern Ireland, and isnt a American anyway. I would think IRA, most likely terrorist from Ireland strirring up America. Ann Coulter is man, and one of those sick kind too. I think he must have to get a waxing at least twice a week.
432268
I disagree about Coulter and Hannity. Oh they are good at lying and spinning, but they are not in Limbaugh's league. No, the only guy out there who can tell a bald-faced lie with as much in-your-face bravado as Druggy Limpboy is Bill O'Reilly.
503111
I likely know about as much as you do, planksheer. As with all such scandals, more details will gradually trickle out and we'll slowly become better informed. But what we know already is pretty damning.\n\nI believe admiralbob's first paragraph will be proved correct and, if so, it is crystal clear why bush was compelled to throw goss overboard last Friday. It's bad enough that these ANP sleaze with their hypocritical self-righteous moralizing engage in sex scandals that make their Democratic rivals look like choir boys in comparison, but to have a top intelligence official compromise an ongoing national security investigation due to his immoral conduct?! Jesus tap-dancing Christ, we can't have this shit going on! We're a nation at war, aren't we? Fighting evil-doers, right? Anyway, that's what The Decider keeps telling us...
727854
FFS - are you too stupid to do your own internet search?!?\n\nGerry Studds - enter Gerry Studds, page, scandal\n\nStill too much for you? Fine - here ya go: \n\n~*~*~\nGary Studds Congressional Biography\n\nSTUDDS, Gerry Eastman, a Representative from Massachusetts; born in Mineola, Nassau County, N.Y., May 12, 1937; attended the public schools in Cohasset and Derby Academy in Hingham, Mass.; B.A., Yale University, 1959; M.A.T., history, same university, 1961; teacher at St. Paul’s School, Concord, N.H.; foreign service officer, United States Department of State, 1961-1962; member, President Kennedy’s White House staff, 1962-1963; legislative assistant to Senator Harrison A. Williams, Jr., 1964; State Coordinator of United States Senator Eugene McCarthy’s presidential primary campaign, 1968; delegate, Democratic National Convention, 1968; elected as a Democrat to the Ninety-third and to the eleven succeeding Congresses (January 3, 1973-January 3, 1997); censured by the Ninety-eighth Congress pursuant to H.Res. 265, passed July 20, 1983; chairman, Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries (One Hundred Third Congress); was not a candidate for reelection to the One Hundred Fifth Congress.\n\n~*~*~\nAP’s Extraordinary Double Standard Regarding Mark Foley and Gerry Studds\nPosted by Noel Sheppard on October 15, 2006 - 12:23.\n\nSince the Mark Foley page story first broke, there have been many articles discussing the double standard in which Republican and Democrat sex scandals are handled by Congress and the media. No finer example of such hypocrisy has been demonstrated than by the Associated Press on Saturday, October 14, which had nothing but high praise for the now deceased former Rep. Gerry Studds while it continued to heap scorn on Foley.\n\nFor example, an article entitled “Studds, first openly gay person elected to Congress, dead at 69,” spoke glowingly of the former Congressman who, unlike Foley, actually had a sexual encounter with a seventeen-year-old male page in 1973. In fact, the AP suggested that this was an important moment in history for gay rights:\n\n     “Gerry often said it was the fight for gay and lesbian equality that was the last great civil rights chapter in modern American history. He did not live to see its final sentences written, but all of us will forever be indebted to him for leading the way with compassion and wisdom,” said his husband, Dean T. Hara, 49, in a statement.\n\nThe article included some glowing praise from a current member of Congress:\n\n    U.S. Rep. Barney Frank (D-Newton), who announced he was gay four years after Studds’ disclosure, said yesterday his colleague didn’t let the scandal get in his way.\n\n    “It was very important to see, for young people in particular, somebody as capable and talented as he be openly gay,” said Frank, “That gave a lot people the courage to say, ‘I can survive this business in being honest about who I am.’”\n\n~*~*~*~*~\n\nGerry Studds Dies at 69; First Openly Gay Congressman\nNew York Times\nBy DAMIEN CAVE\nPublished: October 15, 2006\n\nGerry E. Studds, the first openly gay member of Congress and a demanding advocate for New England fishermen and for gay rights, died early Saturday at Boston University Medical Center, his husband said.
1156577
You're a great American\n\nI love Mr. Hannity, He tells it the way it is. He's very knowlegeable and not afraid to speak out on the issues.