Has anyone seen the movie  "What the Bleep Do we Know?" What did you like/dislike about it?
459523
I liked the movie demonstrates the biochemical basis for much of our behaviors and how our interpretations (based on past expereriences) so colors our experiences of present circumstances that two people can observe the same events and have *completely* different experiences.  There's a new freedom available in seeing the difference between what happened and our interpretation of it - removing a lot of the domination of events out of our life story and empowering us as the experiencer of our life.
217310
I have watched this movie several times and to tell you the truth, I felt bad after every viewing.  Not bad in the "I shouldn't have watched this" way, but bad that I have a part in nailing Jesus to the cross, even today.  I actually cried when I first watched it, and I am not one of those people that cry at movies, but this was a moving experience for me.  \n\nThe movie was adapted from a book that a num wrote a couple of hundred years ago.  She had visions from Jesus about what the Passion was like, and was told all of this in great detail, including how many times He was whipped, and the crown of thorns and everything else.\n\nI haven't read the book, but am still looking for it, but I have heard, from people who have read it, that the movie is very close to what this nun had written.\n\nI don't think the movie was supposed to "bring people to Christianity", but was meant to show people how Jesus suffered.  I agree that something should have been done about the Resurection, since Passion referes to the crusifixtion, death and resurection, but I did kind of like the ending, showing Him walking out of the tomb.
176312
Yes I have. It is hilarious in most parts, but the British wierdness of it was too strange for me at times. The robot played by Alan Rickman was wet-yourself funny. I also liked when the spaceship changed and was like "bee-boo-bee-boo-beep" The ending was too weird for me. I did not understand it and it ruined the movie for me. I mean, I had a general understanding of what the ending was, but I just didnt understand it entirely. I still love the movie though!
1120905
It was once of the best sequels I have ever seen.\n\nWe all know that as a rule, sequels suck. Thankfully there are a few exceptions and this is one of them.\n\nFirst of all, it isn't the same story as the first movie told in a different location. The story is a continuation, an explanation of the story that started with part 1. The location is different of course, and so are the new rules to survival. \n\nBut there are also new special effects and new gruesome ways to die, which is always a major plus in a movie like this. So for those people that thought that the 'victims' in part 1 were not all that 'deserving' of Jigsaw's cruel twisting of circumstances, there are a few better, seemingly more deserving candidates in this one.\n\nAnd there is a not-so-surprising surprise twist at the end. It was kind of obvious, but you get the idea. \n\nmy point? watch it anyway. If you like it, great. If not, then you can at least make fun of it with some relevant jokes instead of having to resort to the usual 'it's so dumb I wouldn't even watch it' lines.
847824
I agree with you. I thought it was a very intense movie also. I was also taken by the elements you mentioned shown in the movie. One thing that always bothers me in these type of films is the fact that if the characters are alerted of danger they disregard the warnings. For instance in this movie the siblings are warned by a psychic who describes in detail the horror that awaits them. The woman is so sincere she almost starts crying. What's up with that? Wouldn't any rational person feel there's some legitimacy in what the concerned person is saying? I would. All in all it was a good movie and tough on the nerves!
831636
This movie was a beautifully created film.  The cinematography alone made it well worth the cost of a ticket.  The costuming was beautiful, artful and relatively authentic.  As long as you are/were willing to sit through the length of the movie, it was very well done.\n\nI do agree that the use of a Chinese actress versus a Japanese actress was not the brightest call, but unfortunately, most Americans really don't recognize the differences (very sad, but also true.)\n\nI loved the story, though now that I have it on DVD, I tend to skip over the beginning where she's a child (except for the flavored ice scene - it's just beautiful).  I really love watching the development of the characters.\n\nWhile a lot of people think it isn't worth renting over and over again, let alone owning, I see it as a beautiful rendition of a lost part of history.  And to think - the book was written by a man! Go figure!
177243
I loved it.\n\nI've heard that even people who never saw the movie "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" also liked it.
246964
It was a great movie. It kept you guessing about what would happen next. \n\nSPOILER: This is for Agent_Check who had questions about the end.\n\nHe had the diamond in his pocket because the robber put it there when he bumped into him at the end.
498000
The movie is nothing more than religious propaganda, and not as ineteresting as propaganda like "Passion of the Christ".  \n\nThe movie was pseudoscientific crap, full of deliberate lies and urban myths.\n\nThe scientists who appearded were all outraged at the way they were presented in that movie.\n\nBy all means watch it, but be aware that it is just a work of fiction intended to gain converts to a religion. Almost nothing they say is true or accurate.
288535
Believe it or not, Not only is it my favorite film, it's was just talking about it seconds before you posted this question. \n\nAs for why I like it, well, the film is an incredible adventure that explores not only life and death and how we deal with it, but also the human psyche. The film shows life and death not as an "it's all bout who you know," Christian style after life, but takes more of a, "death is what you make of it," neo-Buddhist approach. The scenes that take place during the "living" years, especially those dealing with the "double D" anniversary and why they had it, shows human frailty and presumed strength in a unique and all too real light... And the way those scenes were tied into the ending and the changes in attitude were incredible.\n\nIn short, the movie itself was insightful, provocative and quite enjoyable with elements of a great romance and a marvelous drama while still presenting a fantasy style storyline mixed with a little mystery and all the humor you would expect from Robin Williams. The cinematography and effects were excellent and the acting was phenomenal. Why it wasn't a bigger success is beyond me. \n\nAs far as I am concerned, this is one of the best movies ever written and produced.
992385
Absolutely loved the film.  Only Munich BARELY edged it out for bets film of last year (but only barely).  It's one of the few open and honest films about the subject of oil and the Middle East.  I was also stunned at the storyline involving the recruitment of the young terrorist.\n\nAmazing stuff.
668621
I thought it was pretty good, actually. It was different at least. People always say "that was the worst zombie movie ever". Too bad those dumbasses couldn't figure out that they WEREN'T ZOMBIES! DUH. The film was about a doomsday virus that caused people to turn on each other, not zombies...\n\nSucks that they're making a sequal to it now; 28 weeks later. Sequals almost always stink.
652107
Before I answer, let me say that my brother-in-law is fire chief in Shanksville so responded to the crash.  As a result, I have seen all the immediate after photos so this movie was important for me to see.\n\nYes, I felt the movie was based on fact.  It is well done and not at all exploitative.  I think all Americans should see it.  Those people really were heroes and I would like to think, in the same situation, that I would choose to go down fighting and not just let it happen.\n\nNot a sound was heard in the theatre during the entire film.  I have never been in such a silent theatre.  I also don't think there was a dry eye in the place.  The movie is very emotional and makes you feel like you are right there with them.\n\nOne warning, the movie will be difficult for those that get migraines from extreme motion.  The film is very jittery...like the Blair Witch Project.
234661
i saw the movie and loved it!!\n\nmemories!!!
624540
Haven't seen it yet...but it looks interesting.\n\nIMDB's users seemed to enjoy it greatly, rating it a 10, 426 times.\n\nhttp://www.imdb.com/title/tt0067072/ratings
943345
OMG, finally someone else who has seen this movie!! I rented it and then bought the DVD the next day. I have made all my friends at least watch a few scenes.\n\nI LOVE the mix of humor and darkness in the film. Apparently this is a bit of an Irish thing - based on other Irish films I've watched lately.\n\nCillian is SO brilliant. I just can't gush enough about this movie!!
994372
i saw it. i thought that it was alot different. I thought that they shouldn't of picked that white dude to be the driver cause his hick voice kills it. But the story line was alot better. And Van came in back for alittle bit. \n\nLong story short was pretty good.