what's the past tense of notice?
463721
notice is a regular English verb.\nAnd like any other regular verb, it ends in -ed. In other word 'noticED'
337944
The tense depends on where it is at in the resume.\n\nAn objective section - so be future tense.\n\nYour current job should be present tense\n\nPast jobs should be past tense.
356820
if you're talking about fell, as in to fell a tree, then the past tense is felled. If you're talking about fall, then fell is the past tense.
308908
Depending on the context it could mean notice that work is about to begin on a building, or it could mean notifying creditors of a bankruptcy petition being filed. Try doing a yahoo search for "notice of commencement" - by putting the search text in quotes, the search results should be more specific to what you're looking for.\n\nHope this helps.
500303
Use a verb in past tense (hacer - mandar - pedir and such verbs that denote you asked for something or you ordered something) and the main verb in infinitive.\n\nFor example:\n\nI have the car fixed: [Yo] hice arreglar el auto\n\nThey have the house cleaned: Ellos mandaron limpiar la casa
1010622
Alright- let's say that someone has just given you directions, and they ask you if you have understood what they have said, you could reply either "yes, I understood" or "yes, I understand" - I believe the reason for this is because the info was presented to you already (past tense) but you are being asked whether you understand it now, therefore you can also answer in the present tense, "I understand"- if you are referring to understanding the info at the time it was presented to you, you can use the past tense "I understood".\nGet or got- getting something is considered "future tense"-ie" I get paid on Friday", " I am going to get a haircut"- "got" is considered present tense ie "I have got a ton of homework", "Do you see what I've got?". Hopefully this makes sense...you're doing well- keep up the good work.
1038578
No it doesn't sound right does it.  Unfortunately, there are a lot of grammatical issues with advertising and slogans.  This one comes from AOL, if I'm not mistaken.  "You've Got Mail" is shorter and easier to program than "You have received some email."
963999
Everyone has given you nouns - which is what you don't want.\n'Mention' is a verb.\n'Caution', 'question', 'motion', 'ration' can be nouns or verbs.
1085425
If you are talking about Spanish, which is the language in which I learned these terms, the imperfect tense is used to describe something that happened in the past with no specifically stated time. For example, the sentence "When I was a young child, I went to the mall," when translated into Spanish would require you to conjugate the verbs "be" and "go" (used as "was" and "went" in English) to the imperfect tense.\n\nThe preterite tense is used to describe something that occurred in the past at a specific time. For example, the sentence "I went to the mall last Wednesday" when translated into Spanish would require you to conjugate the verb "go" (used as "went" in English) to the preterite tense.\n\nHope this helps.
401701
It is past tense, you are maybe thinking that 'to go' implies current and active, this is true but the context of the rest of the sentance gives you the tense... 'They let us...', 'They did not let...', 'I let him go' etc (All past tense)\n\nLet without a modifier like 'will' or 'am/are' is past tense 'They will let us go'(future), 'They are letting us go'(present).\n\nThat's a good point!... Is the question mark meant to be inside the quotes? if so that makes it a question (not great grammar tho') probably should read 'They have let us go?'
186597
It's a shame the asker didn't include more of the surrounding text from this article so it could be analyzed more closely.  \n\nAnyhow, grammarians will concur that the structure:  \n\n"...active surveillance and robust peer intervention among high-risk groups such as female sex workers had had an impact in the South..." ,\n\nIS, technically, correct.  Sacramento Dweller was correct in identifying this seemingly awkward grammatical structure as a matter of tense.  Sentences utilizing this particular structure generally fall under the category of "Conditional Sentences."  Sentences featuring the 'had had' syntax are classified as "The Third Conditional," or "Conditional Type Three," and can generally be diagnosed by analyzing them for similarities with following structural formulae:\n\n(The Type 3 Conditional / Third Conditional Formula:)\n\n" IF + <insert past perfect tense verb> + <insert perfect conditional tense verb> = RESULT OF SUPPOSED CONDITIONS.*\n\n*~NOTE:  RESULT(S) of the supposed conditions usually resemble one of the following two structures, depending on when events occurred:  \n\n(1.) Result:  <insert simple present or past tense verb to express an obvious, or predictable fact / outcome>\n\n(2.) Result:  <insert modal verb  + simple present or past tense verb to express a known fact / outcome >\n\nEXAMPLE #1:  "If you had had proper training as an assassin, we would not be in this situation..."\n\nEXAMPLE #2:  "If I'd had proper training as an assassin, you probably wouldn't be here to complain."\n\n(Notice how in EXAMPLE #2, the contractions 'I'd' is used instead of saying, 'I had had' to illustrate the terms of the condition being discussed, though still allowing the reader to ascertain and understand the time-frame and sequence in which events occcurred?)\n\nRules for proper usage of the "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure state that the structures are 'to be used when talking about unreal, or "hypothetical" situations occurring in the past.'  That means, the related events DID NOT 'ACTUALLY' HAPPEN in the past.  Sentences utilizing this structure are almost always phrased to reckon, "If circumstances were different, what could / would have this been like?"  \n\nThe expression of time / tense in this [third] variety of conditional sentence structure IS identified as the past, and indicates that an action was completed "in" the past.  The condition and / or result, therefore, cannot logically be fulfilled because the action in the "IF" clause never actually happened.  Action in "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure is almost ALWAYS characterized by the quality of being absurd, and impossible to achieve.\n\nTense and Terminology?\n\n-Simple Present Tense:  Expresses a fact, habit/routine, or ability.\n\n-Simple Past:  Implies that the action happened before and is not happening anymore.\n\n-Past Perfect (Pluperfect) Tense:  Relates that an action or event ended prior to another action or event.\n\n-Present Perfect (Continuous) [Past-composite] Tense:  Indicates either events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Perfect (Conditional) Tense: Relates varying degrees of certianty or uncertainty about events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Modal Verbs:  incorporated with other verbs to illustrate the notion of possibility, impossability, necessity or other degree of probability.
1182672
FYI-For Your Informtion\nBTW-By The Way\nLOL-Laugh Out Loud\nLMAO-Laugh My A** Off
951270
a high school student asked me a very serious question during the hieght of the bird flu disease.... she asked: "Sir, is "bird flu" the past tense of "bird fly?" She was very serious!!!! \nAnother thing is resigning from a stable job and opening up a business without any knowledge about it!!! That's me!!! hehehehehe.........
874261
Definitely past tense. You will make statements about things that "have happened" in the past, as opposed to things that "are happening" in the future.
57292
The past tense is a verb tense expressing action, activity, state or being in the past.\n\nIn English, there are two distinct types of past tense:\n\n   1. Present perfect (see perfect tense)\n   2. Preterite (or simple past)\n\nEach of these may also be found in the progressive (continuous) aspect.\n\n-----------------------------\n\nThe English continuous\n\n\nFormation\n\nThe continuous aspect is expressed with a regularly conjugated form of to be, together with the present participle of the main verb. For example, in the sentence "I was going to the store," the verb phrase was going is in the past continuous tense - that is, in the continuous aspect and the past tense.\n\nThe continuous aspect can be applied with any mood, voice, and tense, and in combination or not with the perfect aspect, although for obvious semantic reasons, some combinations are less common than others. Some examples of the continuous aspect include:\n\n    * We had been talking for hours. (indicative mood, active voice, past tense, perfect continuous aspect)\n    * If you're not going to be working on it the whole time, … (indicative mood, active voice, present tense, continuous aspect)\n    * … then I recommend you at least be working on it when the teacher gets back. (present subjunctive mood, active voice, continuous aspect)\n    * I wish I were being given more interesting tasks. (past subjunctive mood, passive voice, continuous aspect)\n\n[edit]\n\nUse\n\nThe continuous is generally used with actions that are actively on-going at the time in question, and does not focus on the larger time-scale. For example, the sentence "John was playing tennis when Jane called him" indicates what John was in the middle of doing when Jane called him, but does not indicate for how long John played, nor how often he plays; for that, the simple past would be used: "John played tennis three hours every day for several years."\n\nThe perfect continuous (have been doing), as a special case, implies that the action being described was interrupted at the time in question, and does not clarify whether the action resumed. For example, "John had been playing tennis when Jane called him" suggests that Jane's calling him interrupted his tennis-playing (whereas in the former example, it was possible that he simply ignored her call), and leaves open the possibility that what she told him required such urgent action that he forfeited his match and left.\n\nIn the present tense, the continuous aspect can be used to describe actions that have not begun yet; and in any tense, a similar effect can be achieved with the auxiliary "go" in its continuous aspect. An example of the former is "I'm taking three classes next semester"; of the latter, "I was going to do it if I had time, and then I didn't have time." In this use, this construction has a temporal (tense-like) quality in additional to its usual aspectual one.\n[edit]\n\nThe continuous in other languages\n\nWhile, as noted above, the term continuous is originally specific to English grammar, it can be extended to other languages that have similar constructions.\n[edit]\n\nFrench\n\nFrench does not have a continuous aspect per se; events that English would describe using its continuous aspect, French would describe using a neutral aspect. That being said, French can express a continuous sense using the periphrastic construction être en train de ("to be in the middle of"); for example, English's "we were eating" might be expressed in French either as nous étions en train de manger, or as simply nous mangions.\n[edit]\n\nJèrriais\n\nJèrriais constructs the continuous with verb êt' (be) + à (preposition) + infinitive. For example, j'têmes à mangi translates as we were eating.\n[edit]\n\nSpanish\n\nIn Spanish, the continuous is constructed much as in English, using a regularly conjugated form of the verb
1181376
Used to, you just  had to publish a notice like that in the local newspaper(s).\n\ni don't know if it needs any special , legal wording.\n\n\nHere is one published in a classified ad.\nhttp://lookatokc.newsok.com/classifieds/categories/?section=7260
328375
(past tense)  I.E. I didn't set my alarm yesterday and I overslept.\n\nI need to check my alarm, I do not want to oversleep. (present/future)