century.hit by batsman or made hit by fielding team?
462803
IF IT IS A RAHUL DRAVID CENTURY, ITS AQUIRED.\nIF IT IS A SEHWAG CENTURY ITS A (FIELDING)TEAM WORK.
948940
5772 Runs combined by Australia and England in the 2005 Ashes series. 5 test matches (tour games and ODIs not included).\n\nhttp://stats.cricinfo.com/guru?sdb=team;team=ENG;class=testteam;filter=advanced;opposition=AUS;notopposition=0;homeaway=home;continent=0;country=0;notcountry=0;groundid=0;season=2005;startdefault=1877-03-15;start=1877-03-15;decade=0;enddefault=2006-08-20;end=2006-08-20;tourneyid=0;finals=0;daynight=0;toss=0;scheduleddays=0;scheduledovers=0;innings=0;followon=0;result=0;seriesresult=0;captainid=0;recent=;viewtype=list;runslow=;runshigh=;wicketslow=;wicketshigh=;ballslow=;ballshigh=;overslow=;overslow=;overshigh=;overshigh=;bpo=0;batevent=0;conclow=;conchigh=;takenlow=;takenhigh=;ballsbowledlow=;ballsbowledhigh=;oversbowledlow=;oversbowledlow=;oversbowledhigh=;oversbowledhigh=;bpobowled=0;bowlevent=0;submit=1;.cgifields=viewtype
559249
IN OUR VILLAGE, WE PLAY STREET CRICKET.THERE IS NO ADEQUATE SPACE TO CHANGE THE FIELD.SO, WE THE BATSMEN CHANGE THE ENDS AND STRIKE.THE PHRASE" BATSMEN CHANGE THE STRIKE" IS OKEY AS FAR OUR CONCERN.
560976
Yes.  A batter's uniform counts as part of the batter, a ball that touches the uniform still counts as a hit batsman.
823039
huh? this is very straight forward. Langer would be given out. Waugh was never caught so he wouldnt be. The single was never completed so waugh would still be on 99. He would simply be at the non bowlers end for the next ball.\n\nThere is no issue here at all.
1131545
The legend of Legends, Sir Donald George Bradman (aka The Don), scored a Century in just 24 balls (in those days in Australia each over comprised of 8 balls, hence this magnificent record was set in just 3 overs). He retired from cricket with an unbelievable average of 99.94.\nTo know more about Don, visit his wonderful Museum at Bowral, Australia. or visit www.bradman.org.au
1130021
sachin.....simply coz had he been in DON's era, he surely would have got 35 odd centuries. One can't claim that DON would have got runs at avg. of 99 had he been playing currently.\nAlso sachin has vast experience behind him. DON i guess played just 29 odd matches
648902
Sir Donald Bradman of Australia was, beyond any argument, the greatest batsman who ever lived and the greatest cricketer of the 20th century. Only WG Grace, in the formative years of the game, even remotely matched his status as a player. And The Don lived on into the 21st century, more than half-a-century after he retired. In that time, his reputation not merely as a player but as an administrator, selector, sage and cricketing statesman only increased. His contribution transcended sport; his exploits changed Australia's relationship to what used to be called the "mother country". Throughout the 1930s and '40s Bradman was the world's master cricketer, so far ahead of everyone else that comparisons became pointless. In 1930, he scored 974 runs in the series, 309 of them in one amazing day at Headingley, and in seven Test series against England he remained a figure of utter dominance; Australia lost the Ashes only once, in 1932-33, when England were so spooked by Bradman that they devised a system of bowling, Bodyline, that history has damned as brutal and unfair, simply to thwart him. He still averaged 56 in the series. In all, he went to the crease 80 times in Tests, and scored 29 centuries. He needed just four in his last Test innings, at The Oval in 1948, to ensure an average of 100 ­- but was out second ball for 0, a rare moment of human failing that only added to his everlasting appeal. Bradman made all those runs at high speed in a manner that bewildered opponents and entranced spectators. Though his batting was not classically beautiful, it was always awesome. As Neville Cardus put it, he was a devastating rarity: "A genius with an eye for business."
1146577
AS PER RULES....UMPIRE IS CORRECT.\n\nBUT LARA TRUSTED HIS FIELDER GANGA.\nGANGA MIGHT BE RATED AS RELIABLE BY HIM.\n\nSO, LARA INSISTED THE OUT.
1134590
I'm guessing it was the most sixes hit, but can't find a source at the minute.. (couple of minutes later) Here you go\nhttp://content-usa.cricinfo.com/asksteven/content/story/141316.html
1003432
50 overs any time. twenty20 is like highlights of a 50 overs match. the bowlers r there to be belted around, not make a match thru their ability. batsmen r there to slog fm the beginning. what abt the real tussles between the batsmen and bowlers? \n50 overs match it is for me.
787703
The fastest Century in One Day International was scored by Mr. Shahid Afridi of Pakistan.\n\nIn the K.C.A. Centenary Tournament played at Gymkhana Ground, Nairobi against Sri Lanka on 04.10.1996, he scored 102 runs in 37 Balls with the help of 11 sixers and 6 fours. Pakistan won that match by 82 runs.\n\nSahid Afridi was Man of the Match.
750029
The 35 centuries will be definitely be overtaken within a year. The most likely to do that would be Ricky Ponting - younger than Tendulkar and already has 31 tons to his credit. Tendulkar, unfortunately isn't scoring test centuries as frequently as before. He has scored just 4 centuries in the past 4 years (One against Bangladesh). In the same period, Ponting has scored 17 centuries. I have a feeling that even Lara (32 test centuries) would go past Tendulkar. \n\nComing to ODIs, Tendulkar has almost double the number than his closest rival (40 vs. 22 centuries). I don't see any current player (Including young talents like Tharanga) to reach close to 45 centuries (Possibly where Tendulkar would end up). \n\nBut then, records are meant to be broken. With more matches coming up against minnows, somebody will eventually get to that ODI record. My guess is it will be an hugely talented opener from a subcontinent team  - they play more ODI matches in easier batting conditions. I think the ODI record will be intact for at least the next 10 years.
645323
Yes it is possible.  The first batsmen hits the ball and they run either 1 or 3.  The fielder throws an overthrow (where the fields accidently miss the ball) so further runs or potentially a four are additionally scored.  \n\nSay in this instance, the batters run 1 and there is an overthrow of 4.  That gives the first batsmen his century and puts the other batsmen on strike with 1 run remaining.  The second batsmen hits a 4 or a 6 to win the game and also get his century.
63067
why'd you put this in cricket? i dont know how to help you.
366191
on tuesday a player called Jonathan (Northorthleads) break the record in a club match, he scored 42 runs in one over.\nPrevious record was 32 runs made by Gary Sobers(1968) and ravi Shastry.\n\nit is only a first class record thats all...
962620
Stumps at Day 3\nAustralia 181/1\nLead of over 620 runs \nDon't know why they didn't enforce the follow-on despite having a lead of over 400 runs.\nLanger and Ponting were at the crease.\nHayden was run-out for 37, I guess.\n\nEngland were all out for a mediocre 157 thanks to a six-for from the old war horse Glenn McGrath, his figures reading 6/50. Three wickets for Stuart Clark and 1 for Lee. \nNo addition to Warne's tally of 685 wickets, at least for now.