Whats the difference between; Management Summary, Scope & Objectives?
465420
I believe Management Summary is similar to Executive Summary, so see Source# 1. You can also find some examples there.\n\nRe Scope, not quite sure, but it should be about what you are going to do for the company. Like you said, 'duscussing effects of staff downsizing,... .' \n\nObjectives should be something that you have to find out (and be able to give the correlative findings, outcomes, result in the summary part at the end of the report). Why do you ahve to discuss about the effects...? \n\nI think this should be it!\n\nI cannot find the info from the Internet, so perhaps you want to try a library. Finding some examples of reports, theses, etc.. and see what they put in it.
336491
Vision: what you see your department to be in the future. e.g. to establish being the benchmark of all finance and accounting standards in the whole indusrty of (what industry are you?)\nvision is long term while goal is short term\n\nGoal: what you want to achieve in the future\ne.g. - to be fully computerized by the end of the year.\n\nyou may only have one vision, but you can have lots of goals. \n\nyes you are right, it has to be simple.
290469
Marketing is a wider concept than sales.\n The objective of 'selling' is to get as many quantities sold as possible, whereas the objective of marketing is 'consumer satisfaction'.\n  Marketing involves gaining the prospective customer, brand positioning, building goodwill, promotions etc. and also includes sales.\nSo sales is only a part of marketing with a restricted approach towards profit-maxisation thru icreasing sales but marketing achieves the same objective thru customer satisfaction.
197542
Corporate objectives are the specific things the corporation says it will do. These usually are either the same objectives that are listed on the mission statement, or are more specific objectives of general ones mentioned in the mission statement.
452064
It is management's responsibility to ensure that systems thinking is utilized throughout the Systems Development process. \n\nManagement complements the SDLC when it comes to Project Quality. It provides a method of managing these unique project efforts, which increases the odds of attaining cost, schedule and quality goals. \n\nThe primary benefits of a good Management Process will:\n\nProvide consistency of success with regard to Time, Cost, and Quality objectives\n\nEnsure customer expectations are met\n\nCollect historical information/data for future use\n\nProvide a method of thought for ensuring all requirements are addressed through a comprehensive work definition process\n\nReduce Risks associated with the project\n\nMinimize scope creep by providing a process for managing changes\n\n\nWithout strong management support, circumstances will affect our ability to satisfy the customer and meet our project and product objectives. Management that is willing to intervene, when asked to, will further increase the probability of successfully delivering a quality product.
274256
All projects bring about some sort of change.\nBringing about an organizational change is a project.\n\nHowever the discipline of organizational change tends to focus on the "technical" aspects of the how/why of getting people to change, whereas the project management focus would be on planning and executing the tasks/ideas identified by the organizational change experts.
1121226
Usually management is looking for a specific result - something that is measurable, time-bounded and specific. For example, a certain dollar amount of sales, or a certain level of net income. In order to achieve whatever results you are being held accountable for, you may have to perform certain tasks. For example, generating sales leads might be one task. Another task might be converting those sales leads to paying customers. Another task might be cross-selling another product to those customers. Etc.\n\nSo the difference between "task oriented" and "results oriented" might be that someone focuses on a particular task and does it very well, but without necessarily focusing on the results, or on the relationship between the task and the results. In other words, you might be real good at a particular task - generating sales leads - but not so good at converting those leads to the measurable results (net income) the company is looking for. Someone who is results oriented would be looking to achieve the results he/she is being held accountable for, and would perform whatever tasks would be necessary to get there - but probably would be more conscious of the relationship between the tasks and the results. They would be constantly asking themselves, is this particular task really getting me anywhere towards my desired results? Am I doing the right things right, or am I doing the wrong things right? Those kinds of questions...\n\nI hope this helps!
371721
a manager is supposed to manage depending upon the type of business and the position (specialization)the manager is supposed to manage (management is the art of getting work done by people
622727
vision is like the goal/destination.\n\nmission is how they will reach the destination or goal.\n\nex:\n\nmy vision is to be a level 10 yahoo answerer.\n\nmy mission to answer all questions and have the best answers!
12448
Primarily - well-rounded education, work experiences, and activities that are relevant to your field.\n\nIn terms of format, I always like short & sweet - briefly highlight all the wonderful things you've done, with just enough detail to get them to ask deeper questions.\n\nI always tailor to specific purposes - get rid of anything that's of questionable relevance in a particular instance, in order to allow more space for things that are sure to matter.
1071836
In management, you are studying the "nuts and bolts" of how to manage a business.  (Hence the name "business management," I suppose.)\n\nIn organizational leadership, you are studying how to inspire and motivate followers, to develop a vision for an organization, etc.  It is geared more toward executive levels of leadership.
675382
I'd say to lead is to take an active role, to direct others, and to make the decisions in a society.\n\nTo manage is more focussed on directing others, working with instead of over...etc.\n\nAs if you asked this question, lol.
312703
Project management is the application of knowledge, skills, tools and techniques to a range of activities in order to meet the requirements of the particular project. A project is a temporary endeavor undertaken to achieve a particular aim.\n\nWhereas general management simultaneously involves management of multiple aspects like Science/Engineering, Technical Support, Logistics and Infrastructure Support, Information Technology, Manufacturing, Human Services, and Business development in a business unit or enterprise.
613933
In a nutshell, it is the attempt to understand the goals and objectives of the shareholders in relation to their holdings with the company.\n\nPerformance objectives consist of the financial requirements for the organisation and other key result areas, which are critical for the organisation’s short-term and long-term success. These include profitability, return on investment (ROI) return on assets (ROA), earnings per share (EPS), dividends and cash flow. They are usually determined on the basis of satisfying the needs of the stakeholders, which includes shareholders and others who might have a ‘stake’ in the business such as management, employees, customers, suppliers and creditors. The driving force underpinning financial performance in the majority of cases is shareholder value. If the organisation performs well financially, share prices are maintained or increased. If financial performance is below expectations, share prices drop, limiting the organisation’s ability to attract equity financing to underwrite future operations and growth while also exposing the organisation to the danger of a takeover. Poor financial performance, particularly cash flow, also limits an organisation’s ability to attain debt financing (borrowing).\n\nHope this helps!
168916
Stakeholder management like all forms of management have ethical responsibilities.\n\nIn Stakeholder management the diverse range of stakeholders should have a better respresentation of the effects of a decision than a pure top down management.
191606
Research objective is discovering the answer to a proposed question.\n\nA hypothesis is a prediction of the answer to a proposed question.\n\nThe difference is, a research objective does not assume the conclusion whereas a hypothesis does.
232629
A blurb is a quick summary...maybe a short paragraph.\nTry this to make your own blurb...