why is the gat population still so misunderstood 2006?
473708
Because people fail to understand being gay is who we are.\n\nWhu are people straight?\nWhy are people people?
988927
... apparently only about 53 percent or so lost their mind in 2004... but that's at least  5 percent too many... it seems people are starting to realize what's going on now, but some still have no idea...
299941
Its matter of perception. \nSome see large population as burden other see buyers and workers in them. depends on  lenses of your eyes my dear.
999051
That's a pretty uneducated and illogical question.\n\nThe main problem with your argument is that you make it from a personal perspective, which is obviously laden with vitriol and contempt, rather than a standpoint where you offer even a vague detail, not to mention a hint of statistics.\n\nIf ignorance is bliss, I'm guessing you're in Paradise.  Have a nice day.
510518
Most answers were totally off the mark -- the correct figure is close to 2 BILLION, a figure incomprehensible to the purveyors of provincial sports such as American football.
485437
No it's the American people that are that naive. The people talk this family value crud and then turn a blind eye to the corruption in the government they claim they believe in. If you look with open eyes at the state our government is in today you would either have to be really pissed or just be too stupid to not see the sell out going on today.\n\nSure they can miss a 10 ton shipment of coke because they DON"T CARE about that. Just the same as their bullsh*t about only 11 million ILLEGAL Mexicans in this country instead of the TRUE number that is over 30 MILLION. Oh but that's right we have 30 million Americans that don't want a job according to the BushPig administration.
893768
the original ratio was suppose to be 1 for 30,000 people, however over time that has not been enforced. I'm unsure where and why at this point, but I do know it is not in line with the requirements of the Constitution.
281541
As at the last census in 2001 there were 31.02 million. Better statistics can be found on www.statcan.ca
606770
I dont think everybody is. Think back to 2002. France didn´t even score in his group and small countries were performing much better. I don´t there are "small" countries anymore.
508920
We are not under populated. Land or size of a country has nothing to do with a country population it is the resources that is needed. We are running out of water and areas that can sustain population. \nIt is call "Carrying Capacity" look it up you just might learn something. \nAlso, the USA is losing a quality of life do to over population. 300,000,000 at a 1.25 rate of growth. Traffic, smog, the in ability to fix roads, educate children, health care you name it we are losing everything. Those are the things that made this country the best place to live and we are losing it fast.
774992
This is all news to me.  Considering the population of America has now reached the 300 million mark, they better be prepared for the majority.\n\nTake Care
1118349
Where are you getting this information?  Sounds like the crap that is spread on the nightly news.  You really need to travel to different places in the country and meet different people and then you will have a better perspective.\n\nBTW, it's enigma not inigma.
640492
i like the way you think man. the fact is howver that failure to reproduce is concidered unnatural HOWEVER! there could be a small overlooked message in the DNA that says once every so and so years people will be gay, to decrease the surplus population...i neer saw it that way im glad you enlightenemd mee
237335
I believe 46.8% of the made up statistics are true. However 14% of the made up stats are actually written in French, which I can kinda read....so of those 14%, I can only understand 7.2%. And then you have to take into account the made up statistics which are actually correct, that accounts for 17.3% that I don't have to believe because they're already correct. \n\nSo when it's all said and done, I actually only believe 13.6% of the made up statistics.....which for me is good because I'm gullible!
188021
As you can see the answers are all over the place.  I have provided a link to a website which shows statistics on a graph from the year 2001.  Although it's not the most current of information, it is a good starting point.
134496
I have found a site relating to the topic I can't say that I can vouch for how reputable the information is.  But here is the link you make your own educated decision.  Obviously anyone can fudge numbers to make there own point.
98932
Who says they are? \nAccording to national census data the pregnancy rate among women 15-18 years has dropped significantely since 1988 (1988:111/ 1992:111/ 1996:96/ 2000:84, rate per 1000). While the abortion rate in this group has also dropped from 42% to 24%, the birth rate in this group is still lower nowadays (47 per 1000) than it was in 1988 (53 births per 1000). \nYour problem is perception, not reality.