gun control was Hitler's plan. how can we make it better?
468479
By not practicing it!  Actually, I believe that Hitler called for citizens to voluntary turn in their privately owned weapsons.  Interestingly enough, it was the Jewish community that was the first to comply.  And I believe we all know where it went from there as it related to the Jewish community.\n\nHow can we make it better?  Retain our right to bear arms, that's how!  Vehemently and vocally oppose any efforts, whatsoever, that removes our right to bear arms.\n\nFor the poster who answered that those who own guns are more likely to die from them:  do you think the criminal element is going to surrender their guns?  If you do, then you are deluding yourself.\n\nLastly, after the fall of the U.S.S.R., a prominent high ranking military Officer was asked why they had never attacked the United States when the U.S.S.R. was a SuperPower.  His answer?  "Because everyone knows every American is armed."  That should speak volumes.\n\n"Those who do not learn from the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them."
41982
Well, winning World War II set the United States up to be a world power.  It also helped ushered in a great deal of long-overdue reforms in Europe, and today a European Federal Constitution is now a very real possibility.  Further still,  had Hitler succeeded, he would have undoubetly gone on to destroy the United States indescriminatently.  He would not have spared a single American, even those who resembled his ideal race, because they had grown up in a culture that was, in his eyes, dirty and corrupt (not to mention we were his sworn enemy).  This is one of the many instances in which money plays no role, so the 2.6 trillion figure you site is meaningless.  And even though the use of atomic weapons is still controversial, that alone does not aide your case 'was stopping _Hitler_ worth it.  I'm frankly shocked and appauled that someone could use their freedom of speech, something that wouldn't be enjoyed in a Hilter-ized America, in such a blatantly ridiculous manner.
366109
Hitler would have succeeded in his first Final Solution. No Jews, therefore no Israel. This would have made the Muslims very happy. Until Adolph started using America's vast resources to bomb them off the face of the planet. He wasn't just anti-Jewish you know. He was a full-blown anti-Semite and that means Arabs and anyone else who followed Allah.\n\nAfter he rid the world of these two "vermin" races, he'd have knocked off the Slavs, although by that time, having used them as slave labor for several years there wouldn't be all that many left.\n\nThen the Chinese would'a got theirs. They'd have still become Commies and the only thing Hitler hated more than Semites was Commies.\n\nAfrica would have had their turn at a bloodbath next, because in 1936 he showed just how much he hated blacks.\n\nThen South America would be genocided because it has polyglot races and he was all for racial purity.\n\nThen he'd turn his attention to North America for the same reason and depopulate Mexico, Canada and the US.\n\nFinally he'd bump off any remaining Catholics and all non-Aryan Protestants in Europe.\n\nOne thing's for sure. If Hitler had won, there'd be no overpopulation problem. He'da whittled the numbers down to less than 50 million worldwide.\n\nThen he would have given parts of the world the size of old Spanish land grants to his buddies in the Reichstag and helped them to repopulate said areas with their slaves.\n\nTHEN, he'da found an excuse to declare war on the new owners and wiped them out.\n\nIf he lived into his 90's, he'd probably have succeeded in wiping humanity off Earth, not to mention wiping out most other lifeforms as well (all those nukes doncha know).\n\nWhat a great future..........if you happen to be anaerobic bacteria, that is.
1047961
look at Rwanda.  it is in a terrible place:  a landlocked country in central Africa and is so small.  it is in no way a tactical place to be.  it has no shore to dock ships and no oil or mineral reserves.  unfortunately, helping them would have been a waste of time and funds (military and tactically speaking).  \n\nso, on to Hitlers genocide.  Hitler was a very clear threat and was more than capable of taking over all of mainland Europe during the beginning of the war.  thats why we stopped Hitler.  \n\nalso, Clinton tried helping an African country back in 1993.  remember Somalia and Black Hawk Down?  Clinton didnt help Rwanda in '94 because he wanted to avoid a similar incident.
305653
Hitler wanted to rule the world and have everyone follow him like sheep! Without thinking what was right for the people. Bush is the same trying to have everyone believe he is not a liar! And a control Freak as Hitler was!! The world is now based on control over others and that is a sorry thing.
113483
Gun control is the ability to shoot a fly off a cows backside from 100 yards with out hurting the cow!
62700
hitler was a bad man and he had to be stopped
1008719
I'd still call 'em a rat.  bur hey, you are right on target (wink wink) about the disarming.  Yeppers, they want to take away our guns.  AND they call US nazis!  The downfall of the Democrits IS that most of us sane folks SEE where they are heading, towards socialism/communism.  We in America are live by our freedom to choose.  I choose to work. That make me a capitalistic pig and I'm proud of it.  By my working, the libs get their welfare checks. they should be more grateful of us capitalistic pigs.
833880
Well you could always do a paper on Hitler, and don't get swept away into the World War stuff like everyone else, talk about his actual ascension to power, and how once the Nazi's gained the Reichstad they eseentially gave dictator powers to Hitler. Interesting stuff, you can see how much Hitler played politics in the early part of his administration. Maybe end it with the annexation of Austria. Very political stuff.
491010
The Nazi government had an aim to try and better Germany and expand its borders for "living space". The policies and trends are completely different, so a direct comparison doesnt really work, but i see your point.\nThe current US gov is not, im my opinion making policies that greatly benefit the country, rather business and making rich people richer. The Nazi's, although very much misguided and twisted, did have grand plans to greatly improve Germany, which in some ways they did achieve (they achieved a lot of infrastructure improvements for instance).\nIt does have a nice ring to it though ;)
250255
You know, one of the first things the Nazis did in coming to power was to ban the private possession of firearms.  There's a reason; when they wanted to knock the door down and carry people away without due process of law, they didn't want anyone to be able to fight back.  \n\nIt is also true that when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.  Now, some would say no, outlaws and cops.  I argue that at that point, those two groups become indistinguishable.  Do you honestly believe that every cop in your town is honorable and trustworthy?
1091439
No shooting is necessary, just more effective law enforcement. Since We, The People, comprise a componemenenement of our government (especially during ELECTIONS, which are coming up, Sen. Fatbody, mark your calendar and clean out your desk), it's wise that we do our level best to handle the immigration issue with the same care and concern as you'd use in making a birthday cake for someone you really care about, or fixing a car that you'll be relying on day in and day out. This has to be done RIGHT, and it has to be done properly, and there's no short-cuts.\nThe major thorn in america's side right now on immigration is the bitter fact that our representation is composed of a bunch of check-kiting sellouts, hence the need to act in November. It' important for them to 'feel our pain' at the polling stations, so MAKE SURE YOU GET OUT, AND VOTE. Encourage as many people as you know to do likewise. Low voter turnout is an historic problem in america, and people gotta develop a little civic spirit and make their views known, on paper, in unmistakable fashion, so we don't end up with, like, an oil company effectively running our country(into the ground), and writing national policy that will, in effect, render the actual citizens of our country more or less voiceless. \n\nPut DOWN the gun, and slowly back away. Instead of praising god and counting your ammunition, engage your city council in a dialogue. Attend a city council meeting, ensure that yours and others' views are being effectively transmitted to your state capitol. Write letters to the editor, take advantage of any public speaking opportunities you can find, take some time off from work to volunteer with your local groups, really get out there, and make your voice heard. If more people did that, I think there'd be a lot of people from other countries packing their suitcases and heading for the bus station, and there'd be no translator required. Either A) you do your level best to assimilate and hold a job, or B) hit the road, jack. No in-between, no putting 20 people into an apartment zoned to hold 4 at the most, no drug dealing, no pan-handling, and god help you if you rob somebody, because that'll mean 20 years in the Big House back home wherever it is you came from. There's no reason for american taxpayers to have to support foreigners in our prison system, not when it costs 40 grand per prisoner in support costs(that's a prime candidate for congressional review, there, if you ask me), and further no reason nor pre-existing obligation or debt that requires americans to tolerate a massive and unchecked influx of people from all over the world who simply want to come to america and \nlive off of others. Working rights need to be reviewed, too, if you don't have the authentic papers in your hands that say the government has given you the permission to work in america, then you'd better have some money saved, either that or get OUT.\n\nWe have existing laws. They need to be effectively enforced. That's only fair to all those who've put in a hard day's work all their lives, and deserve to have their rights respected and protected by our government. Part of that 'homeland security' stuff is NOT selling the country down the river, and since there've been several of our so-called representatives out there doing exactly that, walking hand-in-hand down the 'globalization' path with their corporate pals, it's time for a wake-up call, there. I'm all for an annual audit for these guys n gals that'll prove them above reproach, 'unimpeachable', so to speak, that'll give the american public the peace of mind it deserves in placing ANY faith and trust in this whole 'representation' process. If they're not doin' it, they need to be thrown out of office, there's a process for that, it's called 'a recall election'. Fraud and corruption ca
658006
You should speak to Hitler via the usual communication with the dead methods.  He had very similar opinions.  But perhaps he was a better speller!
1092679
There were thousands of good decent jews rounded up, put on trains, sent to concentration camps and killed cruelly, heinously!  Nevermind how many. Nevermind those who conveniently "forget".  Hitler  was a dictator who ran Germany.  He was an insane man with senseless prejudices that blue eyed blonds are superior to brunettes and that jews should be annihilated.  Whole families were called to come...they knew not for what.  There were constant calls for certain people. When their names were called they were ordered into one of the buildings, told to disrobe and get into the showers.   If they were lucky, water came through the shower over their head. People who escaped the worst reported that men who ran the showers would play with freezing and boiling water, on people, but this was relatively kind.  When they weren't playing with the water, they had the gas jets on and people were killed.  Trenches were dug. Hundreds of bodies in a spot were thrown in on top of others.  Meanwhile loving family members were separated with no control over it at all.  And their only "crime" might be that they were jewish.  And the dictator, Hitler, in his insanity considered killing jews his right.\nI was an American in my teens living on the east coast, and I met a woman in her 20s with an accent I was unused to. She told me about being in the showers, and about the night she would have been killed in them with gas only she and her boyfriend had a chance to escape on bicycles and they did and they succeeded, and they  came to the United States and got married.  What I know, I "experienced" through her first hand description. But she was rare. Countless thousands of them never had a chance. She was jewish. Since then I have met many people,  a lot of them Germans who emmigrated to this country who insisted  Hitler wasn't so bad, and this mass slaughter did not happen. They were people who never would have been threatened with the ovens,  they were citizens of Germany and whatever they wanted me to believe they felt strongly about it.  It made Germany's fearless leader look bad,  Since then I have seen moving pictures on tv, taken from life --giant piles and thousands of these nude bodies in heaps  thrown from trucks down big slant shoots, and not acted by actors,  this was real. I have seen this repeatedly.  Even while watching this horror I have heard  Americans decide to accept the (fiction) viewpoint and insist everyone around them believe it. People can believe what they want. I value the truth, pretty or ugly.\nPeople like to fictionalize history a great deal, on many sujbjects. \nThey not only fictionalize the truth but they cite a contrived fiction of yesteryear and get multimillions to believe it for political reasons, for $$$ reasons, and aftter a time for majority reasons. And  then if you have a mind of your own appreciate it but keep your own council, unless asked for the truth.\n  That shameful example of Man's inhumanity to man is  in this case, the truth.  Don't let it be swept under a rug and don't let it happen  AGAIN\nagain.
535067
Hitler did! Huh! What to do think is happening in America?
539288
If you call them on the lies they are using to try to get their power back, they crawfish a little, or jump behind the First Amendment and complain about being called "Unpatriotic". Appeasement didn't work on Hitler in 1938, and it won't work on today's Islamofascists. If the Liberals get their way, this country could very well go under. Then we'd see them scream and piss themselves when they are having their heads removed with a dull knife.
241520
try Kenneth Burke about Hitler's rhetoric!\n\nafter a difficult childhood he hated everything so much that he wanted to destroy the world