What nation will be the one to circumvent Irans nuclear ambitions?
465284
Israel, using the USA as a proxy (as was done in Iraq).
546383
The possesion of nuclear weapons in the hands of any state whether civilized or not makes the world very unsafe.The scenario of having a world power that believes in improving it own nuclear arsenal but shout at those who claim to want it for peacefull purpose is rather ridiculous.Iran possessing Nuclear is has wrong has the US,Russia,China,Pakistan,India,Britain,France etc refusing to disarm their Nukes.Disarmament should be acrossthe board,if not we are creating Nuclear apartheid world
373677
Iran will nuke Israel if given the chance.  They are that stupid.  We have to stop them but the answer is not to nuke Iran but to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons.  I say air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.  This is of course, after diplomacy fails.
129651
Another war - If the U.S. attachs Iran, it's likely China and Russia will side with Iran.  That could get us nuked.
750170
Iran has been a threat since 1979.  Ayatollah Khomeini himself called the USA the great Satan.  That in itself does not constitute a military threat but it deos indicate that they really do not like the USA nor any of the Western world.
575313
Iran ...I mean Germany has peaceful intentions.
1027355
Yes, if they get the opportunity , they will.  Dont trust Iranians.
637318
they ain't gonna. u.s. is hypocrits. they worry about iran while we are sitting on our tons and tons of nuclear arsenal.
36793
Iran, no need to question.
1162473
1.  Israel, because they don't honor their alliances (e.g. bombing of the USS Liberty) and often act impulsively in an overly-aggressive manner.  I think they would actually use their nuclear weapons without giving it a second thought.\n\n2. North Korea, because they've proven that they don't honor any agreements and that they have no problem with being duplicitous (e.g. getting aid for not developing weapons while secretly developing weapons).  Clearly they are determined to develop nuclear weapons, but I'm not so sure they would be willing to use them.\n\n3.  The US may pose the greatest threat to North America, since they are the only country that has actually used a weapon comparable to a nuke.  They have the means, and they are clearly willing.  Will their current policies lead to their use, which presumably would be followed by a counter-attack that would decimate parts of North America?
427551
Iran is threatening world peace....by disobeying the west.\n\nIran has 2 choices:\n\n1. Obey the West and prosper.\n2. Disobey the west and suffer consequences.\n\nNo one wants to live on a planet where Iran has nuclear weapons. This will not be tolerated by any G-8 nation. If Iran refuses to comply with western demands....war is inevitable and regime change .
356129
Neither. Iran looks around the world and sees that several of the countries in their region have nuclear weapons, such as Israel, China, Pakistan, and India. This places Iran at a disadvantage should hostilities ever break out. From Iran's standpoint, it is unacceptable that their enemies have nuclear weapons, and they have none to defend themselves with.\n\nIran does not want a real war with the US. They know that they cannot stand up against the US military in an actual shooting war. In addition, the damage to Iran's infrastructure due to air attacks would be so great that it may take them a generation or more to rebuild.\n\nIran also doesn't want the world's attention on this issue. The more that the world pays attention to Iran, the less that they will be able to get away with their less desirable actions (i.e. financing suicide bomb attacks against Israel).
313917
iran, or the next one belonging to the group that obliterates one of our building/monuments/or bases....of course iran has a way out...cease their nuclear programme.
109426
Not going to happen. Europe and the US going to war with Iran is a possibility.
532696
It should not be allowed nuclear capabilities, and we should all endever to prevent this occurance, because it is not within the intrests of the Western world. I recognise the arguement that Iran is as unstable or backward as the Western press portray it to be, however a neuclear Iranian would enable it to dictate policy in the region to a much larger degree, look at North Korea for example. The West needs a weaker Iran to exploit its natural resources, we should not be apologetic about this fact, we should however be careful how we go about it. As previous events have shown, badly planned interferance is far worse than isolationism.
549897
Iran only has the capability (at the moment) to make a dirty bomb rather than a full nuclear device.\n\nWhy wont use one if they get it is that pretty much the rest of the world will turn Iran into a crater - the nuclear taboo would galvanise the world against them to immense proportions. Anyone they are likely to launch against is also likely to be a nuclear power.\n\nThe leaders in Iran are on to a good thing and are unlikely to risk losing this.  Aggressive rhetoric has been part of Arab/Islamic culture for decades - the very definition of sabre rattling.\n\nPeace out
680493
The only comments by the US that are relevant to Iran is, it will not allow Iran to be a Nuclear power.  IT has stated, as has the European countries in the UN, that it believes that Iran is seeking to become a Nuclear power.  If the US is a liar on that basis, then so are the European powers.  The consensus is, that Iran is not being truthful about it's intentions relative to nuclear power.  I agree with that consensus!