What can I find About hate speeches containing sexual preference?
473113
WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO ?
20474
Searching the Community Guidlines, I can find no specific prohibition of these topics.  There is a mention in the Usage catagory about prohibiting anything that angers or incites users.  Perhaps they feel those topics are just too polarizing to the public.\n\nIt's also possible (but probably unlikely) that the questioners themselves deleted the questions.  I've included a link to the Community Guidelines for you to review.
458673
A man of gross intolerance, filled with hatred and bigotry towards all things not Islamic.  He is new in office and his rhetoric is quite ugly (telling everyone Israel will be eliminated).  If he ever makes an effort to match his rhetoric to actions I suspect he'll be eliminated quickly.
877850
Yes, I've read them.  The gays and pro-fags will just deny them though.  Or when all else fails, they'll just call you a hater homophobe.  Like anyone's afraid of a gay!  (Sorry homophobes, you know what I mean)
1149108
The first link is excellent and I will include some things from it.  It also offers the observation that throughout history, "disliked minority groups" have been stereotyped as a threat to society's most vulnerable members, from the Middle Ages when Jews were accused of murdering Christian babies in ritual sacrifice to the "threat" Black men posed to White women.\n\nThe study most often quoted as demonstrating that homosexual men were more likely to molest children was done by Paul Cameron.  Cameron, however, misrepresented all male-male molestation as being commited by homosexuals   He also went so far as to claim that male to female molesters were often bisexual, and "misquoted" (lied) about other studies in order to skew his data further.   \n \nIt goes on to list two other studies including a study by Dr. Carole Jenny which showed that in the  352 emeregency room cases she studied, the molester was a gay or lesbian adult in only 2 of the 269 cases in which an adult molester could be identified – fewer than 1%.\n\nI wish I could find the study that shows that something like 80% of male-male child molesters are in a sexual relationship with the boys' mothers, and I hesitate to quote that much, but it's such a good stat.
46991
The American Psychological Association page on homosexuality (link below) may be a good place to start.  There are more links at the bottom of the page.
418118
go to google scholar.\n\nHere's one...\nJournal of Social Issues\nVolume 55 Page 429  - Fall 1999\ndoi:10.1111/0022-4537.00126 \nVolume 55 Issue 3 \n  \nPerpetrators of Prejudice \nThe Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? \nMarilynn B. Brewer
890886
Most religious books are full of some hatred. Even the Bible is full of such hatred. It's not fair to single out one text.
376532
Any question that includes the words 'children' and 'sexuality' should ring alarm bells, especially when posted on a web site. Get help before you get into trouble.
726374
I read one yesterday and was shocked at how many people wrote "I'm not racist, but but I hate..." It made me really sad, usually you see enlightened, intelligent sensitive people (for the most part barring the jokers) then suddenly to see the opposite- a bunch of bigots, with prejudice and hate.\n\nI thought these discusions could help eliminate hatred based on skin colour or where your parents were born. I guess we humans still have further to go than I thought.\n\nI'm English but live in South Africa. Here everyone is working towards overcoming the divides. It seems that in the UK it is more acceptable to a be a racist. Theres so much hatred. I dont want to live like that. But I advocate freedom of speech, and that must aply to everyone. Im going to just read the questions that deal with issues not based on a persons skin colour. \n\nNo you are not alone in your frustration. I just hope peoples attitudes can change for acceptance rather than hate.
528391
Although I'm a firm believer in freedom of speech I find it quite disturbing that people don't have a problem with using this word in front of anybody, at any time.\nIt negates any sign of intelligence that you would not find it in your vocabulary to communicate disgust, anger and other emotions without resorting to a word that literally means fornicate or sexual intercourse. Aren't our brains a little more evolved than that?\nIf you want to use it, you have the right, but other people have the right NOT to hear it everywhere!
635613
Hatred and prejudice.
298357
What did Freud have to say about homosexuality? \n\nFor those who don't know, Freud among other professional dignitaries signed a statement, in 1930, which called for the repeal of the law penalizing homosexual relations between "consenting adult males." \n\nIn 1930 Freud again spoke in the Vienna public press on the subject of homosexuality. This time he appeared as a co-signatory to a statement addressed to a joint Austro-German legal commission which was considering the revision of the penal code. Among the other signatories were Artur Schintzler, Franz Werfel, and Moritz Schlick. The statement noted that the commission was reported as deadlocked over a proposal to repeal Paragraph 175, the law penalizing hosexual relations between "consenting adult males." But the deadlock should be broken. "Humanity, justice and reason" all required the repeal, and it should be agreed to immediately. "Homosexuality," the statement continued, had "been present throughout history and among all peoples." The laws which penalized it represented an "extreme violation of human rights" \n\nSigmund Freud's basic theory of human sexuality was different from that of Ellis. He felt that all human beings were innately bisexual, and that they become heterosexual or homosexual as a result of their experiences with parents and others (Freud, 1905). Nevertheless, Freud agreed with Ellis that a homosexual orientation should not be viewed as a form of pathology. In a now-famous letter to an American mother in 1935, Freud wrote: \n"Homosexuality is assuredly no advantage, but it is nothing to be ashamed of, no vice, no degradation, it cannot be classified as an illness; we consider it to be a variation of the sexual function produced by a certain arrest of sexual development. Many highly respectable individuals of ancient and modern times have been homosexuals, several of the greatest men among them (Plato, Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, etc.). It is a great injustice to persecute homosexuality as a crime, and cruelty too.... \n\n"If [your son] is unhappy, neurotic, torn by conflicts, inhibited in his social life, analysis may bring him harmony, peace of mind, full efficiency whether he remains a homosexual or gets changed...." (reprinted in Jones, 1957, pp. 208-209, from the American Journal of Psychiatry, 1951, 107, 786). \n\n1905:  Freud Invents Sexuality\n\nIn his 1905 Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality Sigmund Freud invented the idea of sexuality is a process independent of an individual's sex.  Thinkers before Freud from Ulrichs to Westphal to Krafft-Ebing believed that most men are born "normal" (i.e. heterosexual) but that male inverts inherit some female mental characteristic that makes them sexually attracted to members of their own sex.  Freud rejected the idea and argued that the direction the sexual drive takes has no necessary relationship to inherited sexual characteristics. \nInstead, Freud theorized, all children are born polymorphously perverse - their sexual desires can be drawn toward any object - and it is their childhood experiences that cause their sex drive to be directed to members of the opposite or the same sex.  Freud did not condemn homosexuals or other "perverts" and he was skeptical that homosexuality could be cured, but Three Essays continued the psychiatric tradition of labeling non-heterosexual sexuality "perversions" and "aberrations".  One section of the book even gives child-rearing tips to help parents lead their children to "normal" heterosexual adjustment.\n\nSince Freud rejected hereditarian theories of the causes of homosexuality, he also rejected the notion that homosexuals or inverts are necessarily feminine.  According to Freud, whether a boy grows up to have a masculine or feminine personality has nothing to do with the direction of his sexual desire.  Thus, depending on
224968
Something that includes, sex, violence, bad spelling, bad stuff about Jesus, Bush, Arabian people, Muslims, Christians, homosexuals...
279975
Feminism? :-))\n\nMisogyny is the hatred of women, misandry is the hatred of men.\n\nAnd yes, if you take it too far, sexism. :-))
1035018
No, hatred is not a criminal offense.  The deeds you do and things you say as a result may be.
213183
Yes.  Homophobia and gay bashing are still rampant.  Just look at some of the answers to questions here and you'll see it,