Will the US ever be attacked on its own soil again?
469885
Unfortunately, yes.\n\nWe've cracked down on security, so it will be harder.  The terrorists know this, so their attack will be even more devestation than 9/11, I seriously fear.
149591
If that happens the US will pull all our funding and whatever troops that are under their peacekeeper control.\n\nWithout US support there is NO UN.  \n\nSo they can try.  I would love to get rid of that organization it has done nothing but steal, bad mouth the US and Israel, and waste our money.\n\nWe haven't done anything that we shouldn't have anyway.  Well the Bay of Pigs but that was Kennedy leaving the Cubans out to dry
560281
God Bless the USA!!!!!! We as Americans answered this question during the Revolution, we answered this again on December 7th 1941 when Adolf Hitler threathen the World.\nAnd when people like Saddam Hussien threaten his neighbors and broke every promise under the UN Charter for peace.\n\nTHE ANSWER IS: WHATEVER IT TAKES TO FIGHT EVIL!!!!!\n    WE WILL NEVER GIVE INTO A BULLY!!!!!!!!!!
707951
Well, I don't know when or if there will be another attack upon the US, but I can pretty much guarantee it won't be using airplanes again.  They're more creative than that, and we're pretty stupid for only really securing THAT type of public transportation.
74396
attack america before they decide to bomb or occupy my country [for example like in heroshima ,afghanistan ,veitnam,iraq ,and many many OTher countries who are vitoms to this super power which on LOTS of wepons of mass distruction
25463
During the Cold War, many countries relied on the protective umbrella offered by the US which included troops on the ground to ensure a commitment to defend our friends if attacked.  It did keep the peace.  Now that that particular threat is over it is not surprising that many countries wish to be far more independent.  Perhaps they had to like or lump US foreign policy then, but not now.  Only time will tell whether the world is really less dangerous, especially if there is little protective cooperation against terrorism.  I believe the US has that right.
547748
Yes!!Take a closer look!! Through economics or politics, the U.S.already controls the world.Anyone who speaks out against them( Bush Administration)-France,Iraq,Iran,Venezuela-face invasion or some other form of retaliation. China is being courted,Cuba is being paid,Mexico has the illegal immigrant thing going on and there is no balance of power left. It would take the other countries banding together to stop this and they are kept distracted with internal turmoil or an unwillingness to put aside their long standing differences.What was your question again??Peace.
829627
We could attack them. We really don't need an excuse to go to war with them. We'll just make up lies. That always seems to work good for our government!
1092262
America has not "attacked" those countries, by themselves, out of a whim.  They are backed by the United Nations and many other countries have helped in the effort to decrease terrorism.
973906
There is a difference between protecting the United States and taking the war to the rest of the world. The US does not just have an army on US soil, but almost a third of the planet has US forces occupying it. The enemies of the US are the people that do not want US forces occupying their lands.
880496
I doubt we will ever be invaded, at least not in our lifetimes.  Doesn't mean we won't have war on the homefront...ie...terrorism...but the likelihood of us being invaded is small.  We are the only superpower left in the world...we are geographically isolated...we have a massive population that are allowed to carry guns.  In the small chance that we were invaded,  the only likely contender would be China.  It's the only country that has a large enough military to mobilize such an attack.  But who knows...in a 100 years everything could change...if history is any example..(as I think it is)  we won't be a superpower forever.
799212
Sticking your head in the sand an ignoring lessons from history about the threats our country can and have faced is the policy of an idiot. Even the USA could become the enemy of the UK in the future when natural resources become worth fighting for. The 21st century has along way to go and it is more than likely that a global war will occur again. No doubt caused by a lack of water and natural resources. I woulld much rather our country did not have to give in to the USA, China or Russia when the fighting does actually begin. And only an idiot would be happy to allow a country like North Korea to have access to Nuclear weapons. They have a stated policy of wanting to overthrow the South Korean regime using any means possible.
765901
USA = insecure = hegemony or survival = war
7804
The united states does things that are in its own best interest, but not necessarily if its right or wrong. \n Iraq had no weapons, but we attacked anyway because it is to our advantage politically and economically. \nIt will free up more oil and give us more world power. It is selfish but that is how it is.
38696
look, its simple...if you dont like to get hurt then dont hurt other people in the first place....the americans are ones who always attack other countries....there is SO many countries i can name like iraq,japan ,veitnam,afghanistan,and the list goes on,...i hope one day some powerful country will invade america and we'll see if they enjoy being occupied and attacked.
1105553
America COULD, if she wanted, become a fortress effectively defending herself on the four horizon points from any infiltration, or attack.\n\nBut globalism and unchecked alien invasion has rendered this hypothesis a waste of time. \n\nThe Congressional sale has been going on for decades, and it's near midnite, don't you know.
322510
i dont think that the US is every gonna make the mistake of nuking anyone country unless and until it is unavoidable because they have learnt their lessons from hiroshima and nagasaki.\n\nand moreover they understand that they cant just go about preaching everyone to be responsible with nukes while they themselves do what they feel like.