If AL QUAIDA Had 20 Million SLEEPERS In The US, Do You Think They Could?
468440
I completely understand your innuendo.\n\nGet involved with counter demonstrations by illegals:\nhttp://www.illegalimmigrantprotest.com\nContact your senators and congressmen by email:\nhttp://www.congress.org
926654
Osama was a bit of a spent force already then. He's always been the paymaster of the organisation rather than its Supreme Commander, so I'm not sure that much would have been achieved (except for a propaganda blow to al-Queda) by simply napping him. I agree with the administration's decision that the whole network in Afghanistan had to be crushed, not just a few figureheads. That said, though, I blame Bush & Co. for letting Osama get away with how many top men and active fighters when they had them holed up in Tora Bora. All because they feared massive American losses if they had to fight up hill. So they allied themselves with cash-hungry local warlords. Lesson one: if people can be bought once, they can be bought twice...
1106688
take the first 20,000 we capture, send them to the mid-East. Give them a gun, and tell them if they fight for 6 months, then they can be US citizens. That should work.
1121958
Sadly, no.\n\nAl-Zarqawi was just a drop in the bucket, there's more where he came from.
93685
Honey, there are many Muslims that are American too. It's not the good Muslims that are causing this and it would be an unjust move. Besides, sleeper cells would find another way in another guise to form their cells. So no, it would not be the right thing to do. The Muslims have just as much right to be here as Christians or Jews or Budhist or whatever. America is freedom and freedom applies to religion as well. God bless.=)
88133
It's not six, it's twenty-one!  Dubai is a GOVERNMENT RUN company.  And the government that owns it has allowed Al Queda to launder money through their country, in essence, funding terrorism against the United States of America.  They, Dubai, have also banned CNN from doing anymore interviews or to video tape their operations overseas.  They really want to silence Lou Dobbs.  Why, if they are on the up and up?  Please DON'T BE SO IGNORANT as to think Americans don't want Muslims controlling our ports (port authority).  We don't want terrorists or terrorist funders controlling our ports (port authority).\n***\nTwo of the 9/11 highjackers were from the UAE, the UAE continues to harbor arms dealers and terrorists, the UAE recognizes the Taliban as a legitimate governmet, the UAE refuses to accept Israel as anything but non-existent...I am glad and proud that this action is being questioned.  Listen to your radios, crack open some print, do the research, you will see that there are too many shady business deals and lying going on here for this deal to be legit.  First Bush says he'll veto (he has yet to use this power since he has been president) ANY act passed by Congress to halt these proceedings, then the VERY NEXT DAY he said he didn't even know about the deal until the American public knew about it...Why all the lies and secrecy if this deal is on the up and up?\n***\nLet's debate, not be mean to one and other.
738939
I think that is a great idea if they have the WANT or desire to be a citizen.  Some of them are here only to make money (very little) and are doing the jobs that Americans won't do.  There is no way we can keep them from sneaking into our country and I think we should be more worried about the muslims.
397898
We can and for some reason we don't want to.  I read a Time Magazine article a couple years back around the anniversary of 9/11 it was a time table of the hunt for Bin Laden.  It noted at the very least 4 times when Osama Bin Laden was in the sites of our fire power and we hedged.  Once he was with a Prince of EAU and we didn't want to risk injuring Arab royalty- do we not have sharpshooters?  for another article that is amazing go to this url:\n\nhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11522484/from/RL.2/\n\n\nOr this one:\n\nhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11522484/from/RL.2/\n\nor this one:\n\nhttp://www.rushonline.com/visitors/osama.htm
12072
If the USA keeps making themselves a target, than yes, certainly.\n\nConsider:  Bush himself estimates 30,000 Iraqis slaughtered in his war.  That is considered a conservative estimate by most, but let's say it is true.\n\nEach of those people killed had family members:  fathers, sons, mothers, daughters - all who will grow up hating America, and wanting vengeance - wanting to create their own 9/11.\n\nThat's not even considering our other policies in the world that make people hate us.  As we speak, the Bush administration is creating the next generation of terrorists in the world.\n\nI hope I am wrong.  But it seems like terrorism in the world will only increase, and the "war on terror" will never end.
161790
Today , the world sees the arabs and particulary the muslims as uncivilised people . Let me ask you a question : Why beleve the media ? Why beleve the western polititians ? Why does western people differ of the arabs ? I'm not saying that their wrong , I am saying that their exagerating .This is my idea and  Bin laden has the pretty same idea . He's in anger of the lies of the western peole . He inhertitated a lot of money from his familie and he decided to use it to buy arms and defend his people . He is an honoroble man . Let me remind you that the Americans created Bin Laden to do terrorist atacks on the USSR . Figure it out yourself
1065344
It is not.\nAl Quaida is based in many countries and primarily in Afghanistan. Iraq was a diversionary tactic to vent the anger the American people felt over the attacks on 9/11. No war being fought overseas prevents the possibility of another terrorist strike in the US. We need to be securing our borders and investigating the cells that are already in the US, instead of trying to build an empire in the middle east.\nEvery day thousands of illegal immigrants flow across our southern border. Included in this population are Chinese, Arab, South American, and other ethnicity's that could have terrorist intentions. The US Government will not spend hardly any money on closing this gap because it is not politically correct. They are perfectly willing to squander our tax dollars in the middle east, and have created the largest national debt ever. \nI could go to Mexico this afternoon and arrange to meet someone and bring back weapons, explosives, etc and not be molested by anyone in the process. If I can do it you damn well know there are others doing it. The likely hood of being caught doing anything on the Mexican Border is remote. We are undermanned and overwhelmed down there and no-one except a few vigilante groups seem to care.
1041617
nope never.. if u read their past, they r trained by USA only earlier, Osama for Afghanistan and Saddam for Iran...remember 1 thing, few Trainees r smarter then their Trainer.  Osama is 1 of them.
361012
Probably for the same reason you don't blow yourself up... instinctive self-preservation. Although the world would probably be a better place without them, I'm sure mass suicide isn't in Al-Quaida's plans anytime soon.
545377
There is no such thing as a "civilian Al Queda". Anyone who proudly identifies themself as a member of an organization whose mission is to take over the world with brute force and terror, is an enemy of all humans. If I thought I had Bin Laden in the crosshairs of a Hellfire missile, I would launch. It would be nice to capture him alive, but dead is good, too.
479608
It is probably not likely. I say this because of the countries it surrounds, but it still is possible. They have been to the UAE before, which is near some dangerous countries for Americans.
545814
I don't know that I would go so far as to say they would reach for imperialism, but it is true that governments will take advantage of the fear caused by terrorism to usurp some of the citizens rights.  We saw this after 911, and it will be a long time before it gets set right again.
1146586
Well the key word in there is 'we'. Even if our government was able to determine the true origin of a staged t. attack, I'm sure 'we', the public, would never be told.\n\nAs for whether or not it is possible: sure.