I am confused, did Adam eat Brontosaurus steaks?
465378
Yeah, he and Fred Flintstone would go out after bowling and get a couple of bronto burgers.
381607
This was somewhat difficult to find, I have to tell you, and it does not necessarily mean that the foods were his absolute favorites, but according to the weblink below, he liked to give sauerkraut and mashed potato parties.\n\nPlease take time to vote for the best answer.  I took quite a bit of time looking this up, but I found out some fun stuff along the way.
329047
it was a tyranosaurus rex wasn't it? I'm pretty sure that was it. except for the ones that he'd made up in the mansion of course, we don't know the sequance in which he made those, but the tyranosaurus rex was the first one you saw him do
441240
honestly, i have no idea.\ni dont one bit.\nits a bunch of bull to me.\ni mean he was like in my opinion a cave man or something.\nwhats sooo amazing about some dead cave man?
414692
Lucifer did not cause Eve to eat the fruit.  She chose to eat the fruit herself.  Satan lied to Eve and misquoted what God had told Adam and Eve about eating the fruit.  She just blamed it on the serpent (Satan).  Then Adam blamed Eve (the woman Thou gavest me Lord).  Not one took credit for the action that they had just done.  Many scholars believe that Adam loved Eve so much he ate of the fruit so that he wouldn't be without her.  \n\nIf you read the passages in context, you will see that Satan misquoted what God had told Adam and Eve about the fruit.
938378
To say that God didnt allow people to eat these things anciently because of no refridgeration or anything like that is absurd.  If you believe that then you would have to agree that God is not all knowing.  He must not have realized that one day in the future someone would invent a box to keep ice and meat in because if He did realize it then He surely He would have said "when the ice box in developed you may eat of these unclean animals".  \n\nThe problem here is translation the words "tahor" and "tamei" in hebrew do not translate well in to english so they chose the words "clean" and "unclean".  It is a spiritual teaching using physical things like a pig for instance.  But like any other commandment, if you strip the physical part of actually doing the commandment away, and only focus on the spiritual it will eventually loose its meaning thats why the physical is so important.  This would take me a while to explain but essentially the animals we are not to eat are scavengers, they devour other animals.  The animals that are edible chew cud.  Man was originally made to be vegetarian but when God allowed meat during the time of Noah, He chose animals that chewed cud.  If we were not going to be vegetarians then at least we would only eat animals that chewed cud so we were only one step away in the chain so to speak.  \n\nI dont want to ramble but this is a huge subject that needs to be taught.  There are so many other areas to cover like divided hooves and chewing cud being linked with rightly dividing the word and chewing on it until it becomes milk to feed "baby" believers in Yhwh.  There is really a lot there if you study it out.
93999
Your spelling skills are atrocious. Babies do not come from wounds, they come from wombs. There is no theory of evaluation, it is the theary of evolution. And it is not resion, it is reason. Where did you go to school?\nAnd to answer your question, Adam did not have nipples, because Adam did not exist.
477625
Dinosaurs actually lived preceding bible time and their remains are a decently sized loophole of the book. Comedien Bill Hicks once referenced the topic when he offered a fictional conversation between himself and a believer in bible time. It was a one word question and read: "Dinosaurs?"\n\nBy the way, there were no Dinosaurs at the time of Noah's arc.
733459
You mean Peter, Cephas [the Rock], right? Yup. He was married and his wife prepared them a meal, I think.\n\nPeace be with you.\n\n[I'll research it now and get back to you...]
331350
The story does not stand up to scrutiny and Fundamentalist Christians are easily embarrassed by it.\n\n(a) Were all 8 species of tiger on there? (some have now become extinct but there were eight), If so, how come they didn't attack, kill, eat and thereby drive into extinction, their traditional prey?\n\n(b) Same question as regards lions. The presence of lions would terrify other occupants of the boat. Even lion faeces has this effect.\n\n(c) With the flood waters rising rapidly, how did Noah, lacking any engine room (not even an outboard motor), manage to nip over to Australia to save the koala and kangaroo, or Latin America to save the llama, or China to save the panda?\n\n(d) There must be hundreds of breeds of dogs recognised by the Kennel Club? Were they all aboard? And if it was just a pair of breeding golden labradors, how come we have Great Danes and chihuahas?\n\nChristians are a bit stuck to explain these things.\n\nThey can't say God created them after the Flood, because, allegedly, there was just one Creation, and no afterthoughts,\n\nNor can they claim "they developed later" because they would be conceding there was such a thing as evolution, which the fundamentalists deny.\n\nAnd the most obvious flaw in the story is the size of the Ark. Was it 30 cubitts x 60 (as I recall)? A couple of camels, a pair of elephants and a brace of buffalo and you'd be fairly full already. The giraffes would have to be on deck, you couldn't stow them in the hold. So how come they all packed into one boat? Realistically Noah would have needed a Dunkirk flotilla of little boats, each with its own crew and skipper, to achieve the conservation of every species on earth.\n\nPS as pandas only eat bamboo, and the whole world was purportedly flooded, not just the lowlying coastal areas, how come there were bamboo supplies ready and available for them, when the flood receded? If there wasn't any bamboo, they would now be extinct, woukdn't they?
49256
First one ate fruit was Adam
1016987
Better yet, how did Noah feed and contain all those monsterous dinosaurs?\n\nAnswer is: its a big con....there was no ark !\n\nSlim
285593
It's obvious why he is shy, people want to capture and/or kill him. I would be very elusive too, wouldn't you? I don't know if dinosaurs chewed cavemen bones or tossed them up in the air or not. Some were carnivorous so they probably did snack on them a little.
1066210
He didn't. He fit two of every animal in an extremely huge ark. And back then two of every animal was a small amount because mutations didn't occur among the animals making the many subspecies we have today. We'd only have one type of ape, one type of duck, and so on.
420087
YES man was made on the same day as dinosaurs! and he walked with them for a long time.\n\nwell thankyou for calling me a complete idiot gratvol, but i know that you are sadly mistaken.
1022045
I have never heard of it. I have butchered hogs (not commercially) and that idea has NEVER come up. I cannot see any logical reason to do it. I think he was making it up. How did he say he did it?
515872
I'm pretty sure he didn't, but he did do the Hellraiser movies with Pinhead.  Check out his fansite at Clivebarker.com, cool with lots of images, some openly homoerotic (Clive is gay).