do u know anything about ontology that related to this titels : committment,responsibility,context,content...?
472527
I know a little about ontology as it relates to AI\n\nThere a list of ontologies at the first site, skimmed it. did not see anything but I may have missed something that you might like.\n\nThere a ontology on bibloograhy of the pholosophy of Mind\nwhich may be useful.\n\nContemporary Philosophy of Mind: An Annotated Bibliography \nThis is a bibliography of recent work in the philosophy of mind, philosophy of cognitive science, philosophy of artificial intelligence, and on consciousness in the sciences
252246
4 legs to any good relationship.\n\nCOMMITMENT.\nCHARACTER.\nCOMMUNICATION.\nCHRIST.\n\nAny questions?
640662
cooperation\nalliance\nharmony\nparticipation\nsynergism\nunity
256989
values, commitment, trustworthiness, association, interests, etc.
1025510
your perspective about your organization, people, and our world. It focuses on an agreed-upon focus on adding value to all stakeholders\n\nsocietal - relating to human society and its members\n\nvalue - (in this case) A principle, standard, or quality considered worthwhile or desirable
382069
A synonym for the word "synonym". hmmm... how bout: \n\nanalogue, annotation, answer, characterization, clarification, clue, comment, commentary, cue, delimitation, delineation, demarcation, denotation, determination, diagnosis, drift, elucidation, exemplification, explanation, explication, exposition, expounding, fixing, formalization, gloss, individuation, interpretation, key, outlining, rationale, rendering, rendition, representation, settling, signification, solution, terminology, translation, adequation, agreement, alikeness, compatibility, conformity, correlation, correspondence, equality, evenness, exchangeability, identity, interchangeability, interchangeableness, likeness, match, par, parallel, parity, similarity. ???
1041168
Try http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noun
1021776
Yes, ideas, facts and concepts are all linked. Could you make your question a little more clear?
843008
1 thinking\n2 logic\n3 commonsense\n4 rational thought\n5 facts\n6 proof\n7 tolerance
287149
What is the document catagory or or subject?? Any additional info would help!
44177
I'm sorry, but I don't think that you have actually asked a question here, or perhaps you have left off some very pertinent information. Unless you just wanted the above statement to be explained.\n\nIn this instance, the universe of discourse just means all the points contained in the set S = (p(x,y)), which is all the possible combinations of x = 1,2,3 and y = 1,2,3. For example, (1,3) and (2,2) and (3,1) would all be points contained in the universe of discourse for p(x,y).
245417
The Semantic Web is a project that intends to create a universal medium for information exchange by giving meaning (semantics), in a manner understandable by machines, to the content of documents on the Web. Currently under the direction of its creator, Tim Berners-Lee of the World Wide Web Consortium, the Semantic Web extends the ability of the World Wide Web through the use of standards, markup languages and related processing tools. \nen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Web
566187
methodology for the planned capture and re-use of organisational knowledge.
224564
(m)\n\nPurpose of a Data Dictionary: To DOCUMENT for all posterity the data elements, structures, flows, stores, processes, and external entities in the system to be designed.
637043
i believe what you mean are "existential" and "universal" claims. the word existential refers to words such as some, many, few, or any other word which implies the existence of another set which does not contain members for which the "some..." statement is referring to. a universal statement includes the other group of words including all, none, every, etc which do not imply the existence of a group without the attribute referred to by the statement containing the all, every, etc.\n\nthe problem with universal statements involves a "universal generalization" about an entire set based on the existence of a few members which meet the criterion. example. "my dog is red, joes dog is red too, therefore all dogs are red."\n\nthe problem with the existential statements involve "existential instantiation" let me give you an example. "some dogs are red, i have a dog, therefore he is red". "if it rains the sidewalk is wet. the sidewalk is wet so therefore it rained." you see the problem with this line of reasoning\n\nin short \ndont conclude "all a is b" based on "a0 is b"\ndont conclude "a0 is b" based on "some a is b"
1100298
Intention.  All things start with a thought and manifest from there.
73358
Commitment and understanding\n\nansw3r3r