Which Harry Potter Movie do you feel is least like it's book counterpart?
472650
I was more angry with Alfonso Cuaron and the third movie. The parts that were cut about the Maurader's map, and details about the connection Lupin and Sirius had to Harry's father. Oye. I could go on for days. \n\nI'm the most happy with the fourth movie, really. Considering how much of the book had to be cut out due to time restraints, Mike Newell was AMAZINGLY true to the book. I loved that movie so much!
917728
I love the Phoenix from the comic books, she was awesomely powerful, yet retained all of Jean Grey's memories, quirks and feelings, which was ultimately the key to her undoing.  The movie version of Phoenix was sooooo weak...
516591
i havn't seen the movie but im putting money down that the book is much better.  How many movies do you know that our better then their book counterpart.
1086019
i expect it will be good,but im a little scared that they are going to cut SO much good scenes...i mean,Dobby and Vinky didnt even show up in Harry Potter and Goblet of Fire...that is just wrong!
1018725
i got hooked on harry potter after seeing the first movie, then i read the books, they are a lot better than the movies, i would have loved to see the quidditch world cup in the 4th movie, but no they left all that out, my favorite chacter in the book is a toss up between dumbeldore and mad eye moody, they are both awesome, and the last book is under raps, but i can tell u one thing from having debates about the sixth book, DUMBELDORE FAKED HIS DEATH, HE IS NOT DEAD, email me or message me for details
76899
YESYESYESYES!!!\n\n\nIt has been a few years since I read the books, but I think that it was one of the most faithful book-gone-movie movies that i have ever seen.
8827
i do think the movies should be more close to the books... but i also know it would be too difficult to do it... but i guess there's when the creative side of the filmmakers get into action...they should try to find the way to do it as close as the book as possible... as a conclusion i just wanna say that i was a bit dissapointed of the last movie... they took out so many things
595542
iv always love davinci book... its one of my faves now. but having a bad feeling towards the movie--- it was toned-down... has the church been conspiring with the screenwriter??? it did not put the book into real life... tom hanks and cocteau were lame.. THE DECENT ACTING.tsk...a realy BORING SUMMER MOVIE!\n\nI thought the book was hard to read but this\nmovie was even harder to sit through.\n it supposedly is the best film of the year.. \nDO U THINK THE DA VINCI CODE worth the\nLONG WAIT WE GAVE???\nbrrrrrrrrrrrr...\nANYWEI, ONE WUD JUST GO AND SEE the film\ndiscuss and debate.\nok, i enjoyed as bit...(,")
1061297
It was actually really close to the book. I was surprised. I liked it.
701380
My favorite movie is probably The Outsiders. It's almost exactly like the book. All the characters look just how I thought they would while I was reading the book. The people in the movie were great actors. It so sad but I really like it. Even if it is an old movie.
95410
The Plague Dogs\n\nIt's a cartoon.  The book was written by the same person who wrote Watership Down.  It's so depressing and sad!!!  I hate it!!!!\n\nI also didn't like the Matrix.  I know I'm probably the only person in the world who doesn't like that movie, but I was so damn BORED in the cinema.  I just don't understand its appeal.  Oh well.
390261
It all depends on which film and novel.\n\nThere have been some books that were made into movies that were completely different from the book that made me cringe when I first watched them. If they were all like that, I would be totally against it.\nThere are some that clarify a book, especially if it's an old one. I enjoy Pride and Prejudice and The Count of Monte Cristo better on the screen than reading them because the 19th century writing is very wordy. True, they're not exactly the same, but it gives the general idea at least.\nThen there are the others that are perfect as books and as movies, such as the Lord of the Rings. Those books needed to be brought to the big screen and, though they weren't exactly the same, it was perfect nonetheless.\nAs for everything, it all just depends.
38576
Well... Same pinch... I love Harry Potter.\nThe Harry potter series are deliciously suspensful, with wonderful plot twists, so many characters- some we love, some we hate, some we suspect. It includes familiar student concerns like homeworks, grades,  hateful professors, fierceful rivalry, blush-inducing crushes. Harry has been growing and so have I!\n\nThe movies are good too. Though i would not compare them with the books! The dirctors have done a good job, though we always feel the book has been reduced to a large extent. The trio (Dan, Emma, Rupert) are more than perfect for their roles. And they hav made every teenage fan go 'gaga'.
4573
i LOVED it!! I felt it was better than the other ones, but that's because the fourth book is my favorite. I was disappointed that they didn't include the parts about Hermione and SPEW and the actual Quidditch World Cup game, but I know that the movie would have been almost 10 hours long if the writers included every single part of the book.
69835
harry potter my friend got me into it and now i'm a total geek\nthe only thing i can say in my defence is that i've never dresse up like the characters
510266
I'm a Christian, and I honestly didn't really see the big thrill with the book.  I feel the same way about Harry Potter.  I think that these two literary pieces of tripe are overrated hacks.
552809
Harry Potter (all of the movies)\n\nPeter Pan (the newest movie)