Why is the number 17 significant to ICP?
467600
ICP and other people on their record label mention the # 17 alot in their songs as u might know. And what does all this mean? Violent J explains the 17 at GOTJ 2002: \nOn the day Carnival Of Carnage was released, it sold 17 copies. It was an inside joke within Psychopathic Records.\n\nEvert need help with an ICP question hit me up @ juggalo_xray_mmfwcl@yahoo.com
973501
There are conflicting numbers but heres a site for you...\n\nhttp://www.icasualties.org/oif/
1173176
The answer is always x=17
248920
here is my answers i think they are right 16-A , 17-D , 18-B , 19-A , and the last one is 20-C.
277598
That is a very good rule of thumb (excellent to remember the ballpark numbers for sure). \nOf course, the exact numbers would be a little different from individual to individual (up to 100% in extreme - and rare- cases), but in general it's true.
1073890
usually it +2 but it might also depend on the compound you are talking about.
968199
17/32 means you are on the waiting list of 17 out of the 32 sources for the file.  If you double click on the file you're downloading you can see a list of all the sources, each source will have a number.  The lower the number the sooner you will be able to download from them.\nThe amount of time to download something depends on the popularity.  Rare files take longer then new releases generally.
878948
Well, why is the number 18 in Latin pronounced duodeviginti (2 down from 20), instead of octodecim (following the pattern of the numbers from 11-17)? Same goes for Spanish, but with different wording.\n\nAlso, then why in Chinese do we not say one ten (and) three for 13 instead of ten (and) three, but we say one hundred one ten three for 113? (translated for your benefit)\n\nThere's just something in the etymology of the numbers that dictate it that way. (The others have the explanations of the specific etymology of the number 11)
407793
Because 30 is the magical number statisticians decided upon to indicate whether a population can be assumed to have a normal distribution.\n\nEdit:\nMore on standard normal distributions and why they are so important to statistical analysis here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_normal_table\n\nIdeally you want as many participants in a study as you can manage but costs often get in the way making 30 a popular number.\n\nRegards,\nArmus
972930
answer is 11,13,17,19,23,29
413790
The mere fact that you call it the "20s" and the "19s" and then follow it up with about 30 question marks proves you're about 14. Talk to me in another 14 years when you have some real experience and maybe I'll listen then
651226
Maybe this can explain it better.\n\nhttp://www.sci.uidaho.edu/med532/basal.htm
211094
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_%28number%29\n\nread down the page
438786
67*18/6+17-18=200 is correct mathematically and it follows the order of precedence.\n\nOrder of Precedence can be easily remembered by the expression "Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally".  You follow (P)arenthesis, (E)xponents, (M)ultiplication, (D)ivision, (A)ddition, then (S)ubtraction.\n\nThere is no parenthesis or exponents in this problem.\n\n67*18/6+17-18=200\nMultiplication first: 1206/6+17-18\nDivision next: 201+17-18\nThen addition: 218-18\nSubtraction lastly: 200\n\nProblem solved!
457015
In roman numerals I = 1 and V 5  the use of 1111 =4 because iv  represented the god Jove. The subtractive method of using iv came from more modern uses of the latin variations.  Also using 1111 on the clock creates a visual affect with the v111 on the other side and 1111 is easier to read sideways or upside down.   Check out 'roman numerals.com'
520658
#24,#99,#16,or #20\nWho knows?
749488
Tim GNO is wrong.\n\n17 * 29 * 31 = 10013 has more than 3 factors.  The factors of 10013 are 1, 17, 29, 31, 493, 527, 899, and 10013.  As was mentioned above, only perfect squares have an odd number of factors.  Reason is simply.  Any factor of a number has a "co-factor".  For example, 9 is a factor of 45, and its co-factor is 5 (since 9 * 5 = 45).\n\nSince factors occur in cofactor pairs, there is always an even number of factors, UNLESS one of those cofactor pairs is made up of the same number twice, which by definition makes the original number a perfect square.