who is supposed to pay excise duty?
462807
A Manufacturer or a producer of goods in the first instance pays the duty. Component of the duty is added to the cost of the product which is utimately borne by the end user.
854088
The one who pays the bill.
971527
Hope this helps\n\n1. Preliminary\n\n(1) The rules enacted by the two next following sections shall have effect, in place of the rules of the common law, to regulate the duty which an occupier of premises owes to his visitors in respect of dangers due to the state of the premises or to things done or omitted to be done on them.\n\n(2) The rules so enacted shall regulate the nature of the duty imposed by law in consequence of a person's occupation or control of premises and of any invitation or permission he gives (or is to be treated as giving) to another to enter or use the premises, but they shall not alter the rules of the common law as to the persons on whom a duty is so imposed or to whom it is owed; and accordingly for the purpose of the rules so enacted the persons who are to be treated as an occupier and as his visitors are the same (subject to subsection (4) of this section) as the persons who would at common law be treated as an occupier and as his invitees or licensees.\n\n(3) The rules so enacted in relation to an occupier of premises and his visitors shall also apply, in like manner and to the like extent as the principles applicable at common law to an occupier of premises and his invitees or licensees would apply, to regulate-\n(a) the obligations of a person occupying or having control over any fixed or moveable structure, including any vessel, vehicle or aircraft; and\n(b) the obligations of a person occupying or having control over any premises or structure in respect of damage to property, including the property of persons who are not themselves his visitors.\n\n(4) A person entering any premises in exercise of rights conferred by virtue of an access agreement or order under the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act, 1949, is not, for the purposes of this Act, a visitor of the occupier of those premises.\n\n2. Extent of occupier's ordinary duty\n\n(1) An occupier of premises owes the same duty, the "common duty of care", to all his visitors, except in so far as he is free to and does extend, restrict, modify or exclude his duty to any visitor or visitors by agreement or otherwise.\n\n(2) The common duty of care is a duty to take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that the visitor will be reasonably safe in using the premises for the purposes for which he is invited or permitted by the occupier to be there.\n\n(3) The circumstances relevant for the present purposes include the degree of care, and of want of care, which would ordinarily be looked for in such a visitor, so that (for example) in proper cases-\n(a) an occupier must be prepared for children to be less careful than adults; and\n(b) an occupier may expect that a person, in the exercise of his calling, will appreciate and guard against any special risks ordinarily incident to it, so far as the occupier leaves him free to do so.\n\n(4) In determining whether the occupier of premises has discharged the common duty of care to a visitor, regard is to be had to all the circumstances, so that (for example)-\n(a) where damage is caused to a visitor by a danger of which he had been warned by the occupier, the warning is not to be treated without more as absolving the occupier from liability, unless in all the circumstances it was enough to enable the visitor to be reasonably safe; and\n(b) where damage is caused to a visitor by a danger due to the faulty execution of any work of construction, maintenance or repair by an independent contractor employed by the occupier, the occupier is not to be treated without more as answerable for the danger if in all the circumstances he had acted reasonably in entrusting the work to an independent contractor and had taken such steps (if any) as he reasonably ought in order to satisfy himself that the contractor was competent and that the work had been properly done.\n\n(5) The common duty of care does not impose on an occupier any obligation to a visitor in
839345
The landlord can ask a tenant to pay for whatever they want.  It's up to YOU if you want to or not.  If you don't, I would suggest looking else where, where it's not included in the lease.
677673
wooo....\nyes u have to pay nicely...\nif not, the shop keepers will call the police...
95785
depends on their contract statement.  some say they absolutely have to have to payment BY the due date, not just postmarked
816729
call whoever it is you want to pay and set up arrangements
219037
The import duty in UK is a right ***** I agree.\n\nYou are allowed £18 import duty tax free on merchandise and double that (£36) tax free on items marked as gifts on each package I believe. If you can get them packaged separately this would definitely help (even better if you get them sent different days). \n\nAlternatively if you can bribe someone to falsify the value of the contents then this would be good too but it's doubtful that'd happen!\n\nAs for shipping company, I have no idea. Sorry.
368612
Yes, they have to pay.  Whether or not they do, now that's a different story.
652558
The first answer may only refer to income tax(?) If you take into account indirect taxes such as purchase tax/VAT, duties such as on fuel etc. and other charges such as local authority rates the situation may be different. I think a better picture would be obtained by looking at the government's total tax revenue as a percentage of GNP.\nIn the end you pay your money and hope the government makes good use of it.
1143731
I know you mean council tax, anyhow the lady in question was wrong not to pay her bill. I agree that carting someone off to jail for a minor offence is abominable when paedophiles are being set free.If only more people complained in this country, look at France, they have a riot every time the government there cocks up!It's time we stopped adopting the "stiff upper lip" attitude and started to show the politicians who their bosses are, us the taxpayer!
834249
if they are professional they should say their fee.  if not pay what u feel is right
846344
none they call their agent to do it.
909297
In SSI there is general exemption of excise (Payable to central govt) of Rs 1.00 crore it means that if the production is upto 1 Cr in a year then there is no excise payable. for that the manufacturer has to give an undertaking that as and when the turnover crosses 1 Cr it will get itself registered with excise department.\n\nthere are also many other exemptions available to SSI. mainly in bank credit,sales tax(Now Vat in many states),power tariff etc. which is not available to other larg scale companies
1051564
Indian constitution has provided for different types of tyaxes.  what we pay is on our personal income, which is a direct tax. VAT, Customs etc are on goods, which is an indirect tax.
259524
Yes. Since they are human, they pay tax, the eat and breathe just like anyone else, they should have the same right as anyone else.
929797
1. Custom duty is applicable on all import irrespect of its use  or purpose\n  2. Depreciation can be claimed under Income Tax Act on imported cars if used in tourism industry. Otherwise depreciation cannot be claimed