If you let Saddam Hussein fight against Osama Bin Laden, who would win?
462145
George 'Whatever' Bush will wins, definitely. \nI'm positive about this one. Really!
654220
saddam was a dictator..but bush s a president of the us,leader of democracy and peace..then i should say bush..cause at least saddam never say i wanna giv world peace..but bush always say this!and hes peace is afganistan,iraq,abu ghraib,guantanamo,supporting israel,threat iran and...
1182805
I wouldn't say Baker gave Saddam permission.  It was more of a the US will look the other way.
362115
No! Saddam deserved everything he's getting!Osama will probably end up in a hole too and we'll em!
652903
BUSH WILL WIN COZ SADDAM IS HUNGRY FROM SO MANY DAYS
190181
bin Laden objects to the presence of US troops (infidels) on Saudi soil. He objects to the US's unconditional support of Israel over the Palestinians. He objected to US support of Saddam Husein during the Iran/Iraq war (where do you think Saddams biological weapons came from?). Basically he just wants the US to keep it's nose out of other peoples business. For further reading (does anyone read anymore?) I reccommend '1000 years for Revenge' by Peter Lance. Pick it up at your local library...
870774
Bush was more worried about Saddam because he threatened Bush Sr. \nNot to mention all the major oil fields at his fingertips now.\nHe could care less about Osama or the American people.
476878
Yes I did.  Did you know that Osama was responsible for 9/11 and not Saddam?  Did you know that Bush has failed to bring Osama to justice?\n\nBush is the Commander-In-Chief of the military.  Therefore Bush is directly responsible for the failure to bring Osama to justice.
870744
Osama Bin Laden to kill Chelsea whilst they're playing, that's good. But more realistically, Man U to win.
29348
Probably Osama and his goons.......
1131933
In an effort to make it look as if he was actually accomplishing something after the 9/11 attacks.  If we all remember correctly it was not Saddam Hussein who was instrumental in those attacks, but rather Osama bin Laden.  here we are 4.5 years into this and still no bin Laden.  All the emphasis is on Iraq.  When did Iraq came into this picture?  It's the classic bait and switch tactic used by so many con men prior to Bush.
980747
Personally I really don't care what happens to Saddam.. he was a horrible man that did horrible things to the people of his country and hopefully with our help they can step in and make their country better... The only person however that I care about is Bin Laden and his followers...
790270
Don't worry about that. Osama Bin Laden has promised to establish a base for action in Iraq after the US troops leave. So New York is the next place to be bombed, because you voted Democrat. Believe it.
688818
It's hard to guess, but I'll take a shot:  9/11 would probably still have occurred.  Gore would most likely have gone into A'stan as a result of the attack.  Saddam would still be in power as I doubt Gore would have had the political will to confront Iraq.  Chances are that Bin Laden would still be alive (as I believe he is today).  The economy might be a little worse off, due to Gore's reluctance to engage in cutting taxes or spending on entitlement programs (even though Bush hasn't been much better in that regard) and appeasement of the enviromentalist and their religious adherence to the Kyoto Protocols.  Assuming he would have been reelected in 2004, Gore would have been able to shift the Supreme Court to the left with more pro-abortion, anti-2nd Amendment justices not to mention placing a more liberal chairman on the Federal Reserve board.  That's about all I can think of.  Frankly, beyong Iraq and the SCOTUS appointments, I don't see much difference.  Anyone who says otherwise is a partisan hack who hasn't been paying attention to how little difference there is between the two mainstream political parties these days.
1026714
Osama Bin Laden. The Sultanate of Oman threw his sorry ass out of there because he tried to rip off Oman of it's myrrh futures.
425673
I agree with deedlebay, w.o.m.d. were just a cloak to get into Iraq. Hello people I thought we were going into war to defend our country because of 9/11. We have people from America and other countries dying everyday and we still haven't got Bin Laden?!? \nNot only that but Saddam is on trial for events that happened in the 1980's not for the innocent lives that were lost on Sept.11th. Where is their justice?
691505
I am not sure that this is defining era for anything other than destruction.  I have to say Bin Laden for the same reason we remember Hitler........other than that I would struggle