who is an in dependent land in afrika?
458236
Just the Jungles.\nNo land is free in this world.\nThanks to USA.
836320
New York, but they also had large settlements in Southern Africa.\n\nChow!!
346020
I went there and it said that no one can register that's outside of South Africa. Are you outside South Africa?
292418
I don't know but if you send me an e-mail I can give you the e-mail address of a south african friend of mine who might be able to give you an answer.
866289
I think that is a really good thought provoking question.  But you have to consider to that Africa was also affected by the slavery trade as well as being Colonised by European countries.  In fact it wasn't until the late 20th century that South Africa was still under the complete control of European Colonists.  But as an African American I can say that I am very happy and fill privileged to be born in America.
54723
Interesting question. The best answer is to check out my thoughts below, and then skim through pages 28-68 and see if you agree.\n\nIn the British colonial Kenya story "Weep Not, Child", the man Ngotho says ‘God showed Gikuyu and Mumbi\nall the land and told them: “This land I hand over to you"'. He believed that the land was in their care and belonged to no one man.\n\nHowland, a British settler, also feels strongly about the land  that it effect it is his "god" because he pours all his energy  and time into it and it *saves* him. He believes that the land was wasteland and therefore he has a God given right, or at least a legal right to ownership.\n\nOne claim is brotherly and shared, the other is selfish.\n\nGood luck!
715607
I assume you mean South Africa - the nation, rather than southern Africa, which would include nations such as Mozambique, Angola, Namibia, Botswana &c.\n\nThe best source for South Africa is Davenport, but a well-balanced paper will need other inclusions, so look at SIPRI (Stockholm Institute for Peace Research), the ANC (African National Congress). Ancillaries would include info on the Broederbond, Umkhonto we Sizwe.and individuals such as Paul Kruger, Joe Slovo, Nelson Mandela, Steve Biko, Cecil Rhodes, Vasco Da Gama, D F Malan and the Ossebrandwag.\n\nI will give you a very brief resume.\n\nThe native tribes of South Africa include the Khoikoi (San, or Bushmen), who inhabited the Cape region at the time of the landing of the first whites. These were all but wiped out by various vagaries, not all at the commission of whites. Natal was inhabited by the Zulu, who suborned other, lesser tribes by their mastery of warfare. Cattle were their measure of wealth, and the researcher should be aware that most of South Africa, including Natal (the Zulu homeland), was free of rinderpest, a disease of cattle vectored by insects. There was a belt of rinderpest across southern Africa, approximately from the Limpopo to Northern Angola.\n\nThe White man landed initially at the Cape, and what is now Cape Town was established as a rest and victualling station for Dutch trading ships on passage to the East Indies. Colonisation followed. The rival British East India Company also used Cape Town and other landings. As Britain became the strongest sea power, she annexed the Dutch Cape settlements, forcing the Dutch inland.\n\nMuch of the history of South Africa revolves around the conflict between the Dutch settlers, and the British. The Dutch became asimmilated to South Africa, and a language developed (Afrikaans), that is a melange of Dutch and the words of indentured labourers from Malaysia and other Dutch colonies. The British remained aloof. Rhodes had ideas of the British Empire extending from the Cape to Egypt. The Afrikaners had a different viewpoint, and moved northwards (the great Trek). Examination of web sites and books on the Voortrekkers will yield great benefits.\n\nUltimately, the British defeated the Dutch settlers, and South Africa became part of the British Empire. The Afrikaaners, however, were made of stern stuff, and eventually were able to declare South Africa as an independant Republic.\n\nSouth Africa became a major player and a significant Power in the world from the 1960s onwards. By declaring a Republic in 1948, the descendents of the Voortrekkers sloughed off Imperialism, and started to plough their own course. This course was strongly biased towards the White man - Black people were disenfranchised and subjected to the policy of Apartheid (seperate development). Despite this, many Blacks, particularly those of the Zulu tribe, gave support to the Republic and served as soldiers and police.\n\nApartheid earned the opprobrium of the world, despite the fact that other countries practiced similar policies, and South Africa was subjected to embargoes on trade, particularly arms. She developed her own arms industry, and co-operated with other pariah nations such as Israel and Taiwan, developing weapons such as the G6 Self-propelled gun and the Rooikat Light Armoured Vehicle that lead the world in this branch of technology. Even today, South African defence products are in the forefront of the arms market, as the legacy of her forced self-sufficiency has not yet fully atrophied.\n\nSouth Africa today is free from all imperialism, except that of Business, Capital, and political correctness. Property in the richest areas of the country is extremely cheap, and there is much employment, especially in the private security market. Its neighbour, Zimbabwe, is a model of post-colonial efficiency, and we can be cheered that post-Mandela South Africa will exhibit similar results.
1085076
I think it's South African...not real sure though
102270
SOMALIA\nZIMBAWE\nMaputo, Mozambique\nAbidjan, Ivory Coast\nLuanda, Angola\nWindhoek, Namibia
584884
Go to the American Embassy in South Africa and ask.
846271
The answers to your questions are available on the free, online encyclopedia, Wikipedia. Look here:\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_africa\n\nHope this helps!
579672
SOUTH AFRICA\n\n- closely followed by india
1011735
America works with the governments that are in place.  It protested apartheid, but worked with the government as a player in the international community.\n\nAmerica only truly targets foreign governments if it perceives them to in some way be a threat to America.  South Africa wasn't.
639701
India, Newzealand, South Africa, Pakistan
192712
becos they are over dependent?
632634
You'll have to clarify your question.  Indigenous peoples have lived in South Africa for hundreds of thousands of years.  Do you mean to ask when Europeans started stealing South African land, enslaving Africans, and using military force to take control of the country?: Do you mean to ask when the first Europeans settled there(1652)?  Or when the British annexed the Cape (1795)?  Or when the Brits seized control over the country through brutal military force (1910 - The Union of South Africa created)? Or when the Boers won control of the country and began the horrors and injustices of apartheid? (1948)?
984029
G'day Ned B,\n\nThank you for your question.\n\nHis surname is African from Kenya where his Dad was born.  He was raised by his white mother in Kansas. He and his wife are members of the Trinity United Church of Christ.\n\nI have attached sources for your reference.\n\nRegards