i need the case on U.S vs. Sharpe. telling what happend in the case.the U.S vs. Sharpe was in the late 1980's.
471973
The citation for United States vs Sharpe is 470 US 675 (1985).\n\n\nHere are the facts of the case:\nArgued November 27, 1984 \nDecided March 20, 1985 \n\n\n\nA Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agent, while patrolling a highway in an area under surveillance for suspected drug trafficking, noticed an apparently overloaded pickup truck with an attached camper traveling in tandem with a Pontiac. Respondent Savage was driving the truck, and respondent Sharpe was driving the Pontiac. After following the two vehicles for about 20 miles, the agent decided to make an "investigative stop" and radioed the South Carolina State Highway Patrol for assistance. An officer responded, and he and the DEA agent continued to follow the two vehicles. When they attempted to stop the vehicles, the Pontiac pulled over to the side of the road, but the truck continued on, pursued by the state officer. After identifying himself and obtaining identification from Sharpe, the DEA agent attempted to radio the State Highway Patrol officer. The DEA agent was unable to contact the state officer to see if he had stopped the truck, so he radioed the local police for help. In the meantime, the state officer had stopped the truck, questioned Savage, and told him that he would be held until the DEA agent arrived. The agent, who had left the local police with the Pontiac, arrived at the scene approximately 15 minutes after the truck had been stopped. After confirming his suspicion that the truck was overloaded and upon smelling marihuana, the agent opened the rear of the camper without Savage's permission and observed a number of burlap-wrapped bales resembling bales of marihuana that the agent had seen in previous investigations. The agent then placed Savage under arrest and, returning to the Pontiac, also arrested Sharpe. Chemical tests later showed that the bales contained marihuana. Respondents were charged with federal drug offenses, and, after the District Court denied their motion to suppress the contraband, were convicted. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that because the investigative stops failed to meet the Fourth Amendment's requirement of brevity governing detentions on less than probable cause, the marihuana should have been suppressed as the fruit of unlawful seizures.
96052
2005\n\nI hope this site helps you...\n\nDon
81317
In a law library.  There is probably one at the county seat that is open to the public.  The S.W. is SouthWest Reports.  Volume 390, page 266, will be the start of the case.\n\nYou can print out all cases from Westlaw's web site, but you need an account with them; it's not free.  If you know anyone who is a lawyer or law student, they may be able to print it out for you.
583033
Article in a Newspaper\nGlaberson W. 1999 June 7. The courts vs. scientific certainty. New York Times; Sect 4; 5 (col 3).
1118110
Munn Vs. illinois a case decided by U.S. Supreme Court  citation is 94 U.S. 113 : 24 L Ed. 77 (1876). search it and read it
235686
Go to the following site and use the search button in the top right corner. \n\nhttp://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/index.html
465470
I wish I knew. check out the Cornell law website if you feel like doing some research on your own.
349423
good job, try ussearch.com
848706
I apologize for the above comments of my colleagues. I find that sometimes people in this field forget that we all started somewhere.\n\nAs for your question, FindLaw.com which is usually a great free site will not be much help to you.  This is because in the instance of Supreme Court briefs, FindLaw's data starts in 1999, and the cases you have listed are all in 1996.\n\nHonestly, I can't think of a site that lists all third party briefs to a specific supreme court case out for you, so you will probably have to find data then read through it \n\nOne more tip:\nCheck and see if your school has a subscription to Westlaw.com\n\nGood Luck
316660
Try here:\n\nhttp://blogs.chron.com/sportsjustice/archives/2006/01/bagwell_and_dra.html
98162
Talk to your case worker. They are the ones that know about your particular case. I don't think Yahoo Answers is the place to get this information, unless your case worker participates here.
1144247
For the case I would try Lexis Nexis.  \n\nHere is a bio on Mauro: http://www.historicist.com/mauro/bio.htm
350978
I would start a search for this information with www.ustrotting.com.  From there, you can probably find the information you are looking for.
667217
Dear Friend,\n\nYou would need to call the court who heard the case.  Unless you have access to Westlaw or Lexis, there's no other way to get the documents.  If you're not sure who heard the case, try to narrow it down to the state and federal courts closest to where the person lived.\n\nYour Friend,\nFrancesois
834681
Unfortunately, Nebraska (lived there for 6 years) is behind the times.  You cannot find out information online.  The best thing to do is to call the district attorney's office (or if you know who your friends lawyer is call them) and ask questions.  I had to do this for my stepson.\n\nGood luck
460158
I think you mean United States v. Nixon (Richard Nixon)\n\nnot.\nNixon v. United States is a different case. (Walter Nixon)\n\nSearch for "United States v. Nixon" precedent turn up the following:\n\nCheney v. United States Dist. Court\nHohn v. Unites States. 524 US 236 (1998)\nTrammel v. United States 445 US40 (1980)
606355
I'm sorry to hear about your brother . . .\n\nFirst, you can search USA TODAY's archives online; they go back to 1987, but unfortunately contain only the text of the articles:\nhttp://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/USAToday/search.html\n\nFailing that, you can contact USA TODAY's Customer Service people online:\nhttp://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/USAToday/customer_service.html\n\nGood luck!