Would you vote for Barrack Obama in 2008?
466253
I would vote for Barrack Obama because he stands for something and he supports the Democratic Agenda. As for whether I would vote for Condoleezza Rice the answer would be no. I am a Democrat and would never vote for someone who belongs to the immoral Republican Party.
633833
No. I did vote for him, but mostly because I was voting against Kerry. If there had been a better opponent, I would've voted against Bush. Kerry was too wishy washy for me and wouldnt take a stand on the issues.
540846
Neither. \n\nThey are both weak-minded tools of the major parties. I would vote independent (again).
428856
No, I would vote for her because she is a capible, strong, intelligent lady. She would make a wonderful president and would have one of the best advisers that anybody could have, her husband the last legally elected president of the United States.
165327
I personally will vote for the candidate that most closely matches my views.  I am a conservative democrat, but to be honest we are so far away from the 2008 elections that a lot can change.  Politicians tend to show thier true colors only reluctantly.\n\nOne great tool I use is Issues2000, it tracks politicians based on voting records and public statements.  It is a good way to determine who I feel most closely associated with and I will be looking at it closely in 2008.\n\nAt the moment I am unhappy with the direction of our country: religious persecution, corruption, lies propogated as truth.  I will very likely be voting democrat on into the future.
1102732
I would.\n\nMost people don't even know who Russ Feingold is, beyond the fact that he was trying to get a measure passed to get the troops home early. Personally, I think he knew that it wasn't going to work, but it DID get them to start thinking of other ways to get the troops home. \n\nBefore saying "hell no", I would look up the things that he's done that no one has heard of. He's been a politician in this state since as long as I can remember.\n\nEdited to add: Just because I like Feingold does not, I repeat, DOES NOT mean that I would vote for Kerry. I think he's a spineless weasel who should be in bed with Gore. Personal Opinion. Not all Republicans are alike, not all Dems are alike. I don't vote a party ticket. I vote for the people that I agree with the most regardless of whether they are Rep, Dem, black, white, pink with purple polka dots, etc. Please don't tell other people what they think. Just because Feingold is on the same 'ticket' as Kerry, doesn't mean that he's a lying idiot too.
844213
Yes, I voted all Republicans in the past and I will in the future and I will only vote Democrat if the candidate comes from the same city I reside in even if it is for the Presidency of the United States of America and even if I disagree with the Liberal Agenda, I will vote for them because we reside in the same town.
577100
I think they have grounds, but it would be hard to push through. I'd like to see Bush and Cheney among others indicted as war criminals.  Its ridiculous what's happening in our government right now.  Who do you think will run in 2008?  If its Hillary are you voting for her, I don't agree with all her policies, but I think she'd make a good president and I think its about time we get some Girl Power in the White house.
609072
Okay, no.  That would be a tad bit creepy.  Also, very undignified.  I would never vote for anyone if they acted like that and then decided to run for a position in the government.  I am impressed that you took the time to type that entire thing in ghetto-speak though.  Rather nice.
1171274
YES!!!!!!! I'd vote for you (oh, crap.. I'm Canadian..)!!\n\nAnd when you become president, we gotta kill all the lesbian cats!!!\n\nWOOOOOHOOOOOO\n\nPAT ROBERTSON FOR PRESIDENT!!
701625
Barack Obama has a better chance to win, so I would consider him the better candidate.\n\nThere are too many people out there who have such hatred for Hillary Clinton and would automatically vote against her. I don't think she would have much of a chance to win.
360304
I know nothing about him, so I would need to do some research on him.  His skin color is not relevant to me.  If I agreed with his views and he was qualified for the office that he might run for, I would consider voting for him.
428832
I will remember him as the guy that turned the republican party into what they always criticized the democrats for... Big Government and lots of meddling in peoples' affairs.\nI'd vote Libertarian if I thought they could win.
1183007
I will not support evil thus it is highly unlikely I will vote in 2008. There has never been an opportunity for me to vote FOR someone that was worth voting for. All of this ZOG nations visible leaders are traitors. Only those that serve the true enemies of our people (the true jewish rulers) are given any chance at victory when they run for office. Both major parties and most of the fairly well known minor parties are under the same jewish control as is our media and financial networks from the Federal Reserve banks on down. The left wing and the right wing are both wings on the same jewish plane with the jewish pilot heading for a cliff as he plans to eject. I am out of the left - right box.
1132856
No. It sounds like a good idea given the nature of certain presidents elected in the past, but this would be way too complicated.  It's likely  registered voters of the opposing party would mostly vote against the incumbent, meaning the incumbent would need to spend his entire first year in office campaigning to protect himself against being voted out.  If this were the case, the President would have no track record to go on.  It would cost the country hundreds of millions of dollars more in campaign funds that could go to better use, and would distract the executive branch, the media, and the general public from focusing on real issues.  \n\nThe ultimate solution to this is for voters to do some more research before they vote.  Look at track records, look at the candidate's real stance on the issues, and resist being spun by the propaganda machines that dictate campaigns.  That's probably unlikely to happen though.
983656
Absolutely. I'm a Democrat, and I'm very happy about the recent election results, but assuming the Dems retain control of both houses of Congress, I would prefer to elect a moderate Republican in 08. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Back in 1994, the combination of a Democratic Congress and President made for a lot of corruption and bad legislation. When the GOP took over Congress, Clinton was forced to compromise, which made both branches of government work better.\n\nSome people think gridlock is bad in government, but it's what the founding fathers wanted. Bipartisanship ensures checks and balances (which have been sorely lacking since 2000). Hopefully we won't have shameful, self-serving pork like a multi-million dollar bridge to nowhere in Alaska, while the Gulf Coast is struggling to rebuild even a basic infrastructure after Katrina. This is the kind of junk government you get when you stack Capitol Hill with a bunch of Yes men.
813004
Wish they were, I'd vote for 'em. \nEIB Baby!!!!!!!! Rushbo all the way!!!!