Do you want the 22nd amendment to be repealed?
458325
I like my Constitution just the way it is. After 8 years of Bush, we'll be ready for some new ideas \n.
56012
Of course not. You should be the first one to obey the constitution because you swore to abide by it
883374
The republicans will probably find a way around that amendment like they have found away around all of the other ones. Lets pray to God that someone will stop them.
390887
Are going???????  ...Don't you really mean to say: Have already gone?    ...Indeed, we are looking at a very sad and dangerous heading for our hard-fought democracy.   Poor founding fathers have been shaking in their bones for some time now, I'm afraid.   I truly wonder: Have we really taken good enough care of the wonderful and immeasurable heritage they had left us?   It is much harder to recover our lost liberties than to lose them.   ...The worst crimes in this world have always been committed and justified in the name of the best and the holiest of intentions.
776792
I wouldn't; it is an outdated system that needs to be completely overhauled...the genius of the founding fathers is that they knew that they could not anticipate what the future would be and therefore built in a system to change things as the country evoled...i.e the second amendment and the electoral college both need to be reconsidered
453178
No\nJust De-criminalized
789945
When you repeal that section of the First Amendment.  You know, the part that says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."
952069
DR: Your side said that when Nixon was in power too!\n\nIt is a great day, I finally feel after 6 long years I got a piece of my country back. Tired of seeing the constitution ripped to shreds by a bunch of pasty-white closeted bigots. \n\nViva Le Resistance!
820174
That would be the appropriate time for Americans to exercise their right to bear arms.  That is the reason that amendment exists - to allow the citizens of the country the right to take up arms against their government when the government is usurping the rights of its citizens.  I would say the scenario you propose is not likely to happen, but the last six years have gotten us pretty darned close!
885132
actually it would be all of the above and then some. i think they would take the law out of our country and we could just do what we wanted when we wanted to whomever we wanted without suffering any consequences. that's what they are aiming for. can you see that?
912137
I am as opposed to gun control as anyone could possibly be. I do however think there should some restraint on not what types of guns you can own, but on who can own them. I like how that part currently is, ie. No violent felonies, No one under 18, And must be a citizen. \n\nThe Constitution says, " The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall NOT BE INFRINGED". Therefore any control over what types of guns you can legally own is un-Constitutional, therefore illegal. People say if you are not apart of a militia you have no right to own a firearm, they are wrong! The militia the founding fathers are talking about is an armed nation of Americans. Like in Switzerland, most men over 18 are apart of the national militia and are REQUIRED to own military style weaponry, unlike America where you are considered a maniac to own an AK-47 or M-16, which I have civilian versions of both. \n\nI found a picture that I really like http://www.haz-matt.com/pics/second%2520amendment%2520primer%25202%2520web.gif , I like how it says, "When they tell you you don't need it, is when you need it most".\n\nWhy I support very loose laws concerning Gun Ownership so much is because when the government starts banning different types of firearms, what's to stop them from banning another, then another, until there's nothing left to defend ourselves but .22 rifles. The Second Amendment is meant to have the people armed to defend themselves against tyranny. To be adequately prepared to fight off a tyrannous government or an invading army we would have to be at the very least equally armed as they are. That means have more civilian access to fully-automatic military arms, not just semi-automatic copies.
565467
Short answer: NO!\n\nIn this country (America) we have a beautiful constitution. This constitution gives us immense inalienable rights. Rights no one can take away from us. One of those rights is the 2nd Ammendmant right, the Right to bear arms! We have the fundamental right in this country to own guns to protect our country, our family, our neighbors, and ourselves. Banning guns would violate the document that has ensured and protected our freedoms for centuries. \n\nMore importantly if you ban guns the only people left with guns would be criminals and the military. And criminals on a daily basis have more access to my house, my street, and banks than the military does. Banning guns would make criminals more deadly.\n\nIn the famous words of Charleton Heston speaking at an NRA meeting, "The only way you'll remove my gun is to pry it from my cold dead hands."\n\nhope this helps.
713052
No. We are armed because of the constitution, and we are Armed so if our government either local or federal gets out of line then "we the people" can put them back in line.\n  Should you have the right to privacy in your home some of the time?
549961
Well, the 3rd amendment - there aren't many issues with troops being quartered today.\n\nThe 18th amendment is also now completely irrelevant, as it was repealed by the 21st. \n\nThe rest all are fairly relevant, although it's arguable that some are more important than others.
688133
The Constitution is intended as a framework upon which the nation can build a legal system.  It's a wonderful thing.  Read it.  (You can get a free copy from the Cato Institute)\n\nThe only thing better is the Bill of Rights.\n\nMy least favorite Amendment is the 18th, but it's okay 'cos the 21st set that right!
1085573
Absolutely. lock-N-load\n\nIn the immortal words of Abraham Lincoln\n"This government of the people, for the people and by the people belongs to the people and if the people shall ever grow weary of the government they may use their constitutional right to amend the government or exercise their revolutionary right to overthrow it."
875382
A brief web search revealed:\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution\n\nhttp://www.ustl.org/Current_Info/22nd-Amendment-text.html