Do we say experiment has been repeated or treament been repeated when talking about replication?
466083
experiment is replicated. data anaylsis has more got to do with experiments than treatments.
1088726
you can iterate:\n\nit·er·ate    ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (t-rt)\ntr.v. it·er·at·ed, it·er·at·ing, it·er·ates \nTo say or perform again; repeat. See Synonyms at repeat.
1080325
Are you copying Darwin's questions?
6514
False.\n\nThe key word in the question is 'always'.  If there is any probability of a different answer, no matter how small, then it can not be 'always'.
434070
How many times can you ask the same question?  You've already asked this.
414921
Sentence number 2 is correct.\n\nThe reason sentence 1 is not correct is because it has a dangling participle. In other words, the participle cannot distinguish what it wants to describe. \n\nIt could be that you realize how much different you have been than before (like in sentence 2)\nOR------\nit could be that you realize how FREQUENTLY you have been different than before.\n\nIf you read sentence 1, you will realize that both senerios could be true. \n\nHope this helps\nThanks\nJon
472064
why same question agan and again and again
45770
I don't think so.This question has been asked several times.You are not supposed to repeatedly ask the same question.
1156399
This is a good question even for a statistician.\nThe problem is your set is small and I do not know what the deviation between samples is, however the repeatability and reproducibility information can bind the window \nthrough which the third value will fall through or perhaps even remain in.  \n\nLet me know.
798456
NONE OF THEM ARE CORRECT.  THEY ARE ALL WRONG.  IF YOU REPEAT IT 20 TIMES, IT WILL STILL NOT MAKE ANY OF THEM RIGHT.  IS THAT CLEAR?
671704
Yes, it is inherent that the human race repeats itself again and again, whether it be mistakes or discoveries.\n\nI had read something in the last year that discussed this exact theory. Some scientist (I forget if it was a historian or another type of academician) had recently published a theory stating that society and people will always be rediscovering the same concepts and go through the same errors in each time period. His theory was that since the way we learn is through experience, and if we haven't experienced something yet, we will need to experience it to truly have a frame of reference. Thus society tends to forget lessons that have been learned if the people in that society were not directly involved in those lessons.\n\nWe can see this in today's society. We have already seen the atrocities of war in the beginning of the 20th Century - famine, genocide, discrimination, etc. Yet these same problems and same concepts are re-emerging as the people who lived through those times die and newer generations who have no real experience of those scenarios become the majority.\n\nYou can see it in every teenager. As they emerge from childhood and become teens, they start to really develop their own sense of independence, self-being and identity. The things we tell them as parents since we have experienced it ourselves become ignored by them. Their frame of reference is limited to what they have experienced so far. Since what we are telling them is beyond their frame of reference - it ends up being ignored - until they experience it themselves.\n\nInterestingly enough, this whole theory that this modern day scientist developed regarding this reiteration of the same themes and need to relearn the lessons of history and ideas is not something new. According to the link that I was reading this from, there was an economist or philosopher in the 1500s or 1600s who had developed the same theory and had given it a specific name. Of course, as a self-fulfilling theory, that theory had been forgotten until it was "discovered" by this modern day philosopher. I'm sure that same theory was discussed in ancient Greece or Rome or Egypt or China and had been similarly lost until it was "discovered" by the next philosopher.\n\nUnfortunately, I don't have the link anymore to that site - until it becomes "rediscovered" by someone else.\n\nInterestingly enough, this whole concept occurs in literature as well. I had been reading a fantasy series by Robert Jordan. This Wheel of Time series has this same concept. It depicts time as a wheel with the different periods as a spoke or arc of that circular wheel. When we are in one spoke or one era, we can look behind us and see parts of the wheel, but not the whole wheel. The part that we can see clearly is history. As it fades further away it becomes legends. Soon even that is forgotten as those sections of the wheel are no longer visible. Eventually though, that section of the wheel comes back to our frame of reference, along it all the mistakes and lessons of that time. Its a very interesting theory that Robert Jordan presents in his series and of course it is a wonderful series to read if you enjoy fiction.
636842
I would agree that you should use once and twice, although people might look at twice if you used thrice (it's a bit old fashioned).
739874
To evolve a thing must have a point at wich to begin,in the limited thought mode.\nevoltion is a constant in the universe, just like change. Evolution is Change and that is the only known constant in this Universe. as we understand it. \nCan time repeat itself, maybe. \nNot as we understand and accept things, so no, evolution cannot repeat itself.
1110566
A) GUYS - AT LEAST 3 TIMES/WK\nB) DOLLS - AT LEAST 12 TIMES/WK
570473
that something happens more frequently than it does not happen, or that something is likely to happen
1077433
Can you provide a link/links to this amazing occurance?\n"Every time"....so how many times has it been?\nYou provide the facts so others can refute.\nHow can people refute when you don't provide any evidence?
707097
an experiment is used to test a hypothesis.  \nhypothesis: i think that if i drop my pencil, it will stop when it hits the ground.\nexperiment: drop your pencil.\n\nif it stops when it hits the ground, you have proven your hypothesis.  if it goes through the ground, you had better find some wings fast, becuase the you are about to fall a very long way, or else you are dreaming ;)