Is Oakland Raiders Michael Huff a complete bust like the other F'ing waste 1st round CB/S picks Al Davis made?
455788
I AGREE WITH YOU THE RAIDERS AINT GOING NOWERE TILL MY DAD AL DAVIS DIES BUT IM STILL A RAIDER OH YEA THE FAG THAT Answer this question before me Suck a dick RAIDER NATION will never die!!!!
557726
Yes....they are.  Complete morons.  They picked a guy for their number one draft pick, who couldn't record a sack against three division three schools.  That is not a number one draft pick. Oh...and Reggie Bush was right there....but I guess Domanick Davis is the answer.  HHHHHAAAAA!
566970
he wasn't worth it. i dont think he even deserved it. the 49ers should have known they could get a qb with more potential in the next draft or out of free agency. They already had rattay, dorsey, and pickett at that moment in time and they should have let them compete for the starting job. Now they signed trent dilfer too! Braylon Edwards should have been the top pick.
1171077
LJ obviously... (18th round... so sweet)\n\nKeep Chad & Larry Johnsons.\n\nYou can easily replace Dunn & Hasselbeck.
900153
Is that a real question? If so, Chargers are about 100 times better. Raiders will get a top 3 pick in the draft.
476116
Yes. They are complete idiots. Reggie Bush is a game changer. Dont tell me they already have a RB, because Bush can be a RB, KR, PR, and WR. And Bush would have also solved some of the Offensive Linemen problems, because his running would take pressure off of them. Its also bad because Mario Williams isnt a great player. This guy takes many plays off during the game, to be the #1 pick, you need to be a gamechanger. Williams isnt a game changer, Bush is.
934305
Looks pretty good, but agreed, put Edge in or even mike bell. Jones-Drew is decent but is sharing carries with Fred Taylor who is really coming on. Definitely get rid of oakland D.
1033795
Yes. They are returning all of their starters, and have added to their secondary in free agency and the draft. They've got Grossman back and healthy for the season (cross your fingers), and now have Griese as a suitable backup. At the receiver spot, Bradley was starting to come on last year before he got hurt, and Berrian hsowed some potential towards the end of the season, and obviously they have Muhammed in the #1 spot. As far as the tight end situation, they don't have a stand-out player at the position, but Desmond Clark is at least serviceable, and Ron Turner's offenses typically dont rely heavily on tight ends. The problem that I do see is what most see as the strong suit- running back. I've got a bad feeling they're going to end up going with a RB-by-committee situation, which I think is a bad idea. Platoon situations don't give either back a chance to get into a real rhythm. Jones is already not happy with the situation, and I'm sure Benson won't be after long. I think they do have a chance to go to the bowl this year, but I think they may be one more year away.
397811
My good friend is a die hard Lions Fan so i am sure he would agree with you.  If history tells u anything it is that, YES, he is the worst, he has done nothing with the talent he has drafted in the last five years, he needs to work on the intangibles of a team like Offensive line and defense.
134299
They've succeeded before, and they will do it again......The fact that he's there has nothing to do with it! I will admit that the raiders have sucked for the last few years, but it's not davis' fault!
453051
Uh..........................................................I think they may take that running back from USC, what's his name????????????????????????????????????????????????????REGGIE BUSH. I mean, yes they have more problems than a little, and taking him will not address a BIG problem that they have (even though D.Davis is not healthy all the time). I mean, they need OL help (D'Brickshaw Ferguson would be a nice pick), a nice backup QB(VINCE YOUNG ANYONE???), D-LINE help(Mario Williams, AKA Little Julius Peppers), and they could get all that if they trade the no.1 pick. BUT, IF YOU KNEW U COULD PICK UP THE NEXT GALE SAYERS WITH THE NO.1 PICK, U WOULD IN A HEARTBEAT!!!
584321
They obviously went with a need pick. Their DL last year was pretty bad. Not picking Bush means that Domanick Davis IS healthy. It's a tough call, would you take Bruce Smith or Marshall Faulk in their prime? I'm just glad Houston didn't take Bush cuz I wanna see Reggie play for many, many years. Houston now has Kubiak which has installed Denver's offense. Denver's offense is harsh on RBs. RBs don't usually last there.
327648
I think the raiders will improve to about 6 - 10 this year.  It may not be what you want to hear but it is an improvement over their last season.  They will be in some close ball games but I think Aaron Brooks just doesn't consistently make great decisions with where to go with the football.  Brooks will look spectacular at times, and then make a couple bad throws that could cost his team a game.  Also their running backs are serviceable, as long as they don't put the ball on the ground.  Their linebackers and safeties have recently had a problem with wrapping up and are missing open field tackles.  Michael Huff was a good pick, that guy is a solid and safe pick.  The Raiders will work through this year and show improvement, but will still lack quality offensive lineman and some linebacker / safety / cornerback help.  They are moving in the right direction now, but will not have quite enough to make the playoffs just yet.  Now if Aaron Brooks improves in his decision making like Jake Plummer did, and all of their draft picks and free agent acquisitions have career years, then they can...but this is the football equivalent of winning the lottery.
801125
Man your are crazy a WR???? I would like to take a WR but last year we drafted a good WR Santonio Holmes! I think they will take a back that is bus-like Michael Bush would be good for us. But we need a good corner back that can get-r-done ike gets burned to much,townsend is getting old,McFadden is a little young, and colclough has not done anything yet and is on IR.
958682
Actually it kind of sums up the Raiders season so far.  Out of control with an owner who has let the game pass him by.  Before the knee event I was keying in on Randy Moss and Art Shell.  Moss looked like a guy who wished he was in a thousand other places last night rather than being at the game.  Shell looked like a deer in headlights, not knowing what to do next.  Pretty sad to see a once proud franchise who based everything on "excellence", as Al Davis use to say, drop completely off the football map.
479764
If you're desparate for someone at third, go for it, but chances are pretty good that there's someone else available. Wiggington has a little power. He hit 17 home runs in 2004 and 7 in 155 AB's last year. And he's entering the prime of his career. And it's Tampa Bay. They're not exactly overrun with talent. When Huff comes back they'll find a place to play Wiggington. So he'll probably get you some home runs and a few RBI since he's batting clean up. But he's not that talented of a ball player overall. His AVG will probably hurt you and he doesn't get on base enough to score runs, even if TB had anyone batting behind him to knock him in. He capable of 25 homers this year, but that probably doesn't make up for the rest of his drawbacks.
950599
Kevin Jones. The Detroit D is terrible and he doesnt get consistant carries so he is the most unsteady performer on your list. Also given how bad the Lions defend the pass (and now are missing 3 of their starting 4 D linemen) I think they will be playing catch up all day sunday, that means not many carries for Jones.