was the population of Cincinnati under 500,000 people in 1970? If not, what is the correct answer?
472404
Joe Hardy is incorrect.  In 1970, Cincinnati's population was 452,524.  Here are the next three decades of population:\n\n1980 - 385,457\n1990 - 364,040\n2000 - 331,285\n\nHowever, there were 925,944 in all of Hamilton County in 1970. \n\nHope this helps!
1156024
The population estimate for 2005 was 1,275,194.  This estimate comes from the U.S. Census Bureau.  \n\nhttp://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/15000.html
371534
counterquestion: (will you ask it for me?) why where the planes that crashed into the towers only filled up 1/5. not one of the airlines would have taken of with so few people on board. at least they say so.
340532
Check out the Cincinnati Enquirer at www.cincinnati.com.
731761
Not many for the majority of people. Most were poor, ill fed and led short lives.
232455
by 2005 the number released by official statistics is 1307,560,000, among of which 43% in cities and the rest in the country. I think the actrual number will be larger than the statistics.
1173129
According to 2000 US Census, the population of the city of San Francisco, California was 776,733. Census Bureau estimate for 2004 population is lower, though: 744,230.\n\nNeed the answer? Ask your friendly neighborhood librarian!
1064792
around 3.45 million.  based on projections off of the 2000 census.
88043
It's not that large of a number. Most people couldn't care less. It's just that the quiet majority are just that.. quiet.
269930
If you're talking about San Jose, CA, the population is just under one million.\n\nhttp://www.sanjoseca.gov/about.html
182578
20,090,437 (July 2005 est.) \nhope it is helpful
12142
The 2003 estimated population of the city proper was 3.093 million. Population of the urban area was 4.791 million as of 2000 estimates, while the metropolitan area (urban area and suburbs) was 5.604 million as of 2003 estimates.
581622
There are probably about the same number of 'weirdos' these days as a percentage of the population as there have ever been and as there ever will be.  It's just that today, as compared with the 1950s, say, we have such a marvelous communications network that you hear about the weirdos.  And if they account for, say, 1 in one-hundred thousand people, there are so many more people now than there were in the 1950s that of course any subset of that population is now much bigger.  The US population in the 50s was around 150 million, and now exceeds 250 million, so we have a hundred million more people, which means 1000 extra weirdos using the non-scientic guess for weirdo-rate I cited above.  In addition to the media-effect, crime investigation is much better now, so many "weird" crimes that may have gone unsolved and hushed up are now solved and used as popular television(!).\n\nWhat an odd species we are!
1042190
2,649,377,941 people. just a guess.
1041778
Now there are 3..In 1970 there were 13
53895
Probably not a lot. Less than 50.
63402
“Between 2000 and 2003, Salt Lake City saw a net loss of some 1,873 people, with the city's population declining to an estimated 179,894 residents, according to a U.S. Census Bureau report released (today).” \n\nIn July 2005 the population figures were as follows:\nSalt Lake City Metro: 181,743 and Salt Lake Area: 1.2 million\n\nSee the references below: