What is, & whats are the behaviors of LEFT BRAINED & RIGHT BRAINED Peoples?   Scholers plz let me know?
458400
I wrote an Essay to define "What is Truth?" and "Why did God create man?" In order to do that, I had to define the terms you are seeking: the ability to store knowledge, process it, and act on it. Only the first two or three pages relate directly to your question, but I think you will be interested in the entirety of it.\n\nEssay\nWe must distinguish between “knowing” and having information. “Knowing” is having direct experience of reality, while “being informed,” is having definitions, descriptions, names and narratives. Knowing vs. being informed are direct antagonists of each other. Knowing is a process that begins in the visual processing of the right side of the brain and culminates in the unification of reality and the two brain hemispheres, while becoming informed takes place in the left side of the brain and culminates in the total separation of reality and the two hemispheres of the brain.\n\nThe left side of the brain breaks up the world into finite components and time sequences, and the other, the right side of the brain, focuses on the unity of things in the world. The left hemisphere is the intellectual, syllogistic logical faculty that we measure through IQ tests, which excels in communicating finite concrete ideas, in addition to the definitions and descriptions that makes up the technological processes (chemistry, mathematics).\n\nBut not everything in the world fits neatly into definitions, descriptions and linear logic. Therein lies the problem with predominantly left-brained people, and Western civilization in general, who try to use this faculty to communicate all realities. This problem is compounded by the ingrained belief of most people that information is knowledge. And worse when we try to understand ourselves.\n\n“Know thyself,” they say. But what is real? What is the truth? \n\nWe perceive the world through our faculty of consciousness, i.e., we perceive thoughts, feelings, physical forces and objects through our consciousness. But consciousness exists apart from the things we are conscious of. We are aware of thoughts and feelings, but these were not generated “consciously.” Neither is consciousness an entity (as is usually taught).\n\nWe are also taught that “will” is a separate entity, but it is not, neither separate nor an entity. Consciousness and the will are opposite polarities (passive and active) of the same function. They are not really separate. They\nare two parts of the same thing, so I shall heretofore refer to them as “consciousness/will,” or simply “C/W.” As two parts of the same thing, they act in concert together. But the will also exists apart from the functions it sanctions, initiates, selects, controls, or suppresses.\n\nWe have verbal and graphic thoughts, but we also have a “thought generator, that throws thoughts into the sphere of consciousness, but functions outside and independent of the will. This is the mind.\n\nWe also have feelings, emotions and sensations, but also a “feelings generator” (incorrectly labeled as our soul). The generator of thoughts, emotions, and sensations is one and the same. But we have no perception of its existence and activity. Something (this thing) is working outside our sphere of consciousness that is guiding our physiological, mental, sensual, and emotional functions. This hidden, subconscious, or unconscious agent is called the spirit, the psyche, or soul.\n\nMost people describe themselves with their habitual pattern of thought and emotional responses to events. And too, most people identify themselves as the thought generator (their minds) and its contents (their beliefs).\n\nThis misunderstanding is responsible for the impossibility to “Know thyself.” I have already described a hidden aspect of our selves which we share with God. Our soul or spirit is intended to be shared by God, and carries a designed and specific function. \n\nThe consciousness/will, or C/W, are the indicator
372112
There are a ton of studies that have been done trying to distinguish intelligence based on which hand you use the most. Some people will argue that lefties are more artistic, creative, imaginative people which right-handers are more scientific, grounded, imperative thinkers.\n\nThis has to do with which hemisphere of the brain is being used and all that wonderful scientific jazz. "Smart" is a subjective term and relative to each individual.\n\nI think the only real difference between lefties and right-handers is that you don't want to seat them next to each other during dinner. That would be a catastrophe.
199439
See the link and scroll down to "earthworm" for an interesting discussion of its segments and what they do.  One segment has the brain which controls movement.  Good luck.
71721
Basically, I'll put it in a nutshell. Theres lots more pyschological bunk that goes along with this, but basically... the Id is the part of the brain that is sorta like a caveman. Caveman want icecream- caveman GET icecream NOW. Caveman want sex- caveman get sex NOW.  (Its the core of your human needs and desires- animialistic sometimes in nature).  The ego is what you see yourself as. It is the thing in your head that says, " I'm cool and smart, therefore, I deserve some ice cream, now".  It more or less gives you reasons to do or not to do things.  Superego has always been described to me as the Cop of your brain. "Sure you want the icecream, and you want it NOW.. but do you need it?  Who's icecream is that? Can you have some of it?  Maybe you should ask, first"  That sorta thing.  I bet someone could give you a link, or explain it better to you.  I haven't studied all that in years and years. I was gonna be a shrink, but turned out to be a sleep tech, instead! lol
888344
I always get on from the left.  It's where the kick-stand is, so it has nothing to do with being a righty or lefty.  It is also the side I get in to drive my car (not in the UK) and the appropriate side to get on a horse.  Seeing a trend here?  ...and I'm right-handed
1127376
Good Question, which took me several minutes of valuable on-line time here at the Library to even consider a possible cause.\n\nPerhaps this overdramatized dualistic Labeling is PROOF of the lazy "lowest common denominator" of COMMON humans? This form of Aristotelian "thinking" harks back to the Ancient Greeks, so is not a new phenomenon, at all. Notice all the bloody WARS throughout recorded human history?\n\nAlfred Korzybsky, author of "SCIENCE & SANITY" and other General Semantics books, identifies this rigid, two-valued form of "Logic" as THE key factor in mental break-downs in thought; i.e. ( human misuse of Language leading TO actual INsanity!). He made his own observations  in psychiatric wards personally supervised in his work. \n\nDoctor Korzybsky (sp?) recommends re-training in General Semantics & MULTI-VALUED Logical analysis & description as a key help, if not a  REMEDY for such insanities! (Of course, those  NOT caused primarily by actual, Neurological Disease.)\n\nBinary or Boolean "Logic" is usefull in design of  NON-organic systems such as computer hardware, but dangerous if used to address REAL Life problems, or in Science and the Arts. The  simplest set of "Logical" values would be Trinary; i.e 3-valued!\n"Yes", "No", and "Maybe/Don'tknow4sure"!  \n\nThe simplistic use of "LIBERAL" versus "CONSERVATIVE" stereotyping you HEAR on the (AM) Talk Shows probably indicates frightened but LAZY Thinking of the commoner who  calls-into these programs. LIB/CON dualisms could also be a deliberate & manipulated RHETORICAL ploy of political pseudo-thinkers who wish to push their OWN (often stupid!) AGENDA! \n\nOoops! Sorry. Got carried away there.  Go READ Korzybsky!
853785
THANKYOU!!!!!!!!\n\nFINALLY SOMEONE ELSE WHO KNOWS MY PROBLEM!!!\n\nhttp://www.corsinet.com/braincandy/stupid.html
1084427
Good for you!\nI am so glad to see someone on here with more that one brain cell functioning :-)
658255
I felt it incumbent upon me to inform you that many "right-wingers" can spell words that others have difficulty with.  Conversely, I have also found that many "left-wingers" are acceptably proficient with spelling, grammar and vocabulary.\nThe fact of the matter is, there is no way to prove a theory that only left-leaning people have any semblance of intelligence.  \nYour "question" is inflammatory, biased, and most of all, completely and utterly untrue.  In second grade, I had a college vocabulary.  I always had an A+ in English/Spelling.  Even now, my friends know me as the one to come to when they need a spellcheck performed on something they typed or penned by hand, because I rarely miss a thing.  Yet, I do lean to the right.\nOn my own works, I may have the occasional typo, but usually that occurs only when I am feeling the effects of sleep deprivation.\nBut, I digress.  To answer your question, "right-wingers" and "left-wingers" are each comprised of both morons and geniuses.\nEdit:  By the way, by insinuating that "right wingers" are intellectually deficient, you are actually further perpetuating the hate and intolerance between the two groups.  It's horribly immature, and most definitely not exemplary behavior from anyone!
899467
So handedness isn't a simple dominant-recessive trait.  It's actually linked to lateralisation - a process during development where the two halves of the brain each become specialised for particular tasks.  So all people who are right-handed are typically lateralised in the same way, for example they have an area of cortex on their left hemisphere dedicated to language (Broca's area) with parts of the right hemisphere dedicated to processing facial expressions (these are just two examples, there are many other left-right specialisations).  But left-handers and a small minority of right handers have different speciaisations.  So Broca's area may be found on the right hemisphere in these people.  Other features of the typical left-right patten may or may not be swapped producing several different patterns of lateralisation within the human population, one dominant pattern, seen in about 90% of people and several other patterns seen in just a few percent of people.\nWhich pattern of lateralisation an individual is, (including whether they are left-handed or right-handed) is determined by their genes.  Incidentally, a very small minority of people are naturally ambidextrous and don't actually have a genetically-determined hand preference.  However, experience and development also play a role.  So a genetically left-handed person who is made to use their right hand will, by virtue of practise become better at using their right-hand.  Similarly, people can teach themselves to be "ambidextrous" by practising with their non-preferred hand, but this isn't the same as natural ambidextrousness.\nSo to (finally!) answer your question about why you aren't left-handed, lateralisation patterns (which determine handedness) are influenced by many different genes and different combinations of these genes will produce different patterns, so while left-handedness will "run in the family" it can't be predicted as easily or reliably as hair colour, or eye colour or any other single gene trait.
823731
The brain is convoluted. As are we all?
939510
I understand what you mean...\n\nAt first glance it appears as if they were trying to be politically correct. I personally would appreciate that openness of mind.\n\nHowever, we can only guess their intentions. We don't know these people, and if they are really open minded or were just being plain unpleasant. \n\nIs this openness of mind unlike them?
245633
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_Police\n\nBest I can do for you, Bucky
1100053
This is funny, I'm sorry but it's SO true! Liberals think they are smart or "educated" and yet they are total fools! Very funny!
837758
The right side of the brain controls the left side of the body. It's also responsible for controlling imagination and creativity so the answer to your ? is yes. South-paws tend to be more creative and intuitive. I don't know so much about brilliant, though. Many of the greatest minds throughout history were housed in right-handed bodies.
19763
It's a very good question. But it would be even better if you asked other way around. \n\nBecause, people who are left-handed are right. cz left side of the brain controls the muscles and also it is a bit faster than left.\n\nBut if you ask the other way around, that why many of us do it wrong? I really don't know. But can guess that its more cultural thing than anything else.\n\nhttp://www.coolquiz.com/trivia/explain/docs/lefthand.asp
399099
My theory: Only women need both sides of the brain men only use half of it. This is why women are alot smarter!\nBut in other theories: Right Side vs. Left Side\n\nEach side of the brain has its own unique and special abilities. The right side of the brain is intuitive, while the left side of the brain is logical.\n\nLeft side processes:\nSpeech\nAnalysis\nTime\nSequence \n \nIt Recognizes:\nLetters \nNumbers \nWords \n\nRight side processes:\nCreativity \nPatterns \nSpatial Awareness \nContext \n \nIt Recognizes:\nFaces \nPlaces \nObjects \n \nFunctions associated with hemispheric dominance include: \n\nRight Hemispheric\nFunctions: \nConnected to left side of the body \nIntegrates many inputs at once \nProcesses information more diffusely and simultaneously \nDeals with space \nResponsible for gestures, facial movements, and body language \nResponsible for relational and mathematical operations \nSpecializes in recognizing places, faces, objects, and music \nDoes intuitive and holistic thinking \nThe seat of passion and dreams \nCrucial side for artists, craftsman, and musicians \n\nLeft Hemispheric\nFunctions: \nConnected to right side of body \nDeals with inputs one at a time \nProcesses information in a linear and sequential manner \nDeals with time \nResponsible for verbal expression and language \nResponsible for invariable and arithmetic operations \nSpecializes in recognizing words and numbers \nDoes logical and analytical thinking \nThe seat of reason \nCrucial side for wordsmiths and engineers \n\nFemales tend to be more left hemispheric dominant and males tend to be more right hemispheric dominant.\nFemales Test Better On:\n\nPerceptual speed \nVerbal fluency \nDetermining the placement of objects \nIdentifying specific attributes of objects \nPrecision manual tasks \nArithmetic calculations (simple math) \n\nMales Test Better On:\nSpatial tasks \nTarget direct motor skills \nSpotting shapes embedded in complex diagrams \nMathematical reasoning