who is this MELKISEDEK IN HEBREW 7...........WHO HAS NO BIGINING& END NO FATHER..WHO IS HE?
475003
Paul isolated an outstanding fact respecting Melchizedek, in saying of him: “In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually.” (Heb 7:3)\n\n Like other humans, Melchizedek was born and he died. However, the names of his father and mother are not furnished, his ancestry and posterity are not disclosed, and the Scriptures contain no information about the beginning of his days or the end of his life. \nThus, Melchizedek could fittingly foreshadow Jesus Christ, who has an unending priesthood. As Melchizedek had no recorded predecessor or successor in his priesthood, so too Christ was preceded by no high priest similar to himself, and the Bible shows that none will ever succeed him. Furthermore, although Jesus was born in the tribe of Judah and in the kingly line of David, his fleshly ancestry had no bearing on his priesthood, nor was it by virtue of human ancestry that the offices of both priest and king were combined in him. These things were as a result of Jehovah’s own oath to him.\n\nA view that appears in the Targums of Jerusalem and of Jonathan and that has gained wide acceptance among the Jews and others is that Melchizedek was Noah’s son Shem. Shem was then alive and even outlived Abraham’s wife Sarah. \nAlso, Noah specifically blessed Shem. (Ge 9:26, 27) But this identification has not been confirmed. The fact remains that Melchizedek’s nationality, genealogy, and offspring are left undisclosed in the Scriptures, and that with good reason, for he could thus typify Jesus Christ, who by Jehovah’s sworn oath “has become a high priest according to the manner of Melchizedek forever.”—Heb 6:20.\n\nThe Bible book of Hebrews points out that Jesus Christ, since his resurrection and entry into heaven, is “a high priest according to the manner of Melchizedek forever.” (Heb 6:20; 7:17, 21) To describe the greatness of Christ’s priesthood and its superiority over the Aaronic priesthood, the writer shows that Melchizedek was both a king and a priest by designation of the Most High God, and not by inheritance. Christ Jesus, not of the tribe of Levi, but of Judah and of the line of David, did not inherit his office by descent from Aaron, but obtained it by direct appointment of God, as did Melchizedek. \n\nAlso, it would have been fitting for Melchizedek to be king and priest in the very place where later the kings of the Davidic line and the Levitical priesthood served and where Jesus Christ, the one chosen to be a king and priest “according to the manner of Melchizedek,” was offered in sacrifice.\n\nThe first kingdom of human history, that of Nimrod, seems to have been initially a city-kingdom, later extending its realm to include other cities, its base remaining at Babel. (Ge 10:9-11) Salem, over which King-Priest Melchizedek ruled in the first kingdom with divine approval, was also apparently a city-kingdom.
788394
NONE - God has no sons
591639
God has no son or daughter...
239960
In reference to the answer provided by orphan_of_the_sky, I would point out that, just as shown in the paragraphs below about Canaan being the son of Noah's son Ham, "Israel" is actually the name of a person, and it is his descendants who are called Israelites.  Note that Israel was also known as Jacob, the father of Joseph (of Technicolor Dreamcoat" fame).\n\nThere are Hittites, Ishmaelites, Ammonites, et cetera.  Take off the "ite," and you will come close to knowing the "father" of that "nation."\n\nBiblical Canaanites\nHam discovered Noah naked while Noah was sleeping off some wine (Genesis 9:22). Because of this Noah cursed Ham's son Canaan to go into servitude not only to his Shemite and Japhethic cousins, but even to his Hamite brethren (Genesis 9:25).\n\nIn the so-called Table of Peoples in the tenth chapter of Genesis, Canaan is included among the four sons of Ham. It is generally agreed (apart from perhaps the most extreme minimalists) that Cush in 10:6 signifies Ethiopia, Mizraim (lit. two lands) is the Hebrew name for Upper and Lower Egypt, and Phut (Puti) a Libyan tribe. The name of their father, Ham, is often thought to be cognate with the old Egyptian name for Egypt, Kam-t (black), though this is more widely disputed. Some skeptics in the very early 1900s postulated that Cush, Mizraim, Put and Ham were all locations in northern Arabia, and suggested the name Canaan was therefore similarly of Arab origin. These scholars suggest it is plausible that inscriptions in the Canaanite language incorporated some geographic and religious phrases that originated in Arabic, although this is denied by other linguists, who posit that Arabic obtained such phrases from their Middle Eastern neighbours. Whatever the situation, it would appear that Canaanites were an amalgam of a variety of ethnic groups including North East Caucasian (Hurrians), Indo-Europeans (Hittites and Indo-Aryan Mitannites), various Semitic groups, Philistines and other People of the Sea, and elements from Egypt or even the Sudan and Libya.\n\nThus in the Bible Canaanites are identified as divided into eleven tribes or areas: Sidon; Heth (possibly Hittites); Jebusites; Amorites; Girgasites; Hivites (Possibly Hurrians); Arkites; Sinites; Arvadites; Zemarites; Hamathites.\n\nCanaanite populations are said to inhabit:\n\nthe Jordan Valley Josh. 11:3, Num. 13:29; Gen. 13:12), and \nMediterranean coastal territories Josh. 5:1; also including Phoenicia Isa. 23:11; and Philistia Zeph. 2:5 \nThe Canaanites or Kna'anim (כנענים, Standard Hebrew Kənaʻani, Tiberian Hebrew Kənaʻanî) are said in Deuteronomy 7:1 to have been one of seven nations driven out before the Israelites. Other passages describe regional ethnic divisions, of which the Canaanites were the coastal component. The term "Canaanites" in this context corresponds exactly to "Phoenicians". The seven Canaanite nations mentioned are the Hittites, the Girgashites, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Perizzites, the Hivites and the Jebusites.\n\nThe Bible indicates that God cautioned the Israelites against the sexual depravities of the Canaanites and their fertility cult (Leviticus 18:27). Thus the land of the Canaanites (specifically the Amorites, Hivites, Hethites, Girgashites and Jebusites) was deemed suitable for conquest by the Israelites partly on moral grounds. Deuteronomy 20:16-17, one of the 613 mitzvot, prescribes that no inhabitants of the cities of six Canaanite nations, the same as mentioned in 7:1, minus the Girgashites, are to be left alive.
660285
Who the heck is he then...?
62856
None of these spellings are correct.  Remember, he was king of Babylonia, they didn't speak or write in English...they had never even heard of such a language.  Hammurabi is only a way to phoenetically represent how his name sounds (and that is only a guess as noone today can tell you how his name was actually pronounced).  Unfortunately, my keyboard dosn't contain Babylonian keys, or I would have written the correct spelling of his name.  Keep up the quest for truth!!!
1160033
Gabriel is Hebrew, so if he was Pagan, he was pre-Jewish Hebrew, which means they probably have a legitimate claim to him. The idea of Gabriel though, God's messenger, the Hand of God, that sort of concept is pretty universal. Lots of Pagan religions have that concept but it's not original to anybody.
76409
ADDED: Oh you are talking about the Name of Gd? There are quite a few names for Gd in the TaNaCH, there is the unpronounceable y-h-v-h, there is the pronounced 'adonai' which means 'my master' or my lord, as in lords and ladies of England, there are the derivitives of El, (meaning 'power' because Gd is the Ultimate Power) like Elohim, El, Eloah, and the constructs like El Elyon, El shaddai. Shaddai, and El Shaddai are derived from the idea that other religions have to have more than one as their godhead, or as godS, but our Gd is El SHaddai, meaning 'Gd Who Is Enough.'\n\nPlease see http://www.jewfaq.org/name.htm for the best, and most accurate, explanation there is on this topic!\n----\nBy 'the Jewish word' do you mean Hebrew or do you mean Yiddish, or do you mean Ladino, or do you mean any of the other languages created by the Jewish People?? As the Jews were kicked out of one Christian country to another, the first thing they did was to learn the local language. However, they wrote it in the language they knew, which was with Hebrew letters. Yiddish is a dialect of German, Ladino is a dialect of Spanish, and on and on. So, i am not sure which language you are referring to by "Jewish" word??\n\nIf you mean Hebrew, it is go-el. i do not know Yiddish or Ladino, so if it is in one of these two languages, i am sorry i cant help.
252235
He has four children.  His daughter Shani, works for his campaign:\nhttp://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=657462\n\nI don't think any of the other children have anything high-profile (and two of them may still be students).
1014520
He said -\n"I form light and create darkness, I make weal and create woe;\n I the Lord do all these things" \n\nHaving the word "evil" ....this is often mistranslated in English Bibles, but in the Hebrew it is absolutely unmistakable. \n\nCan you explain what you mean by "evil" and what God meant by "evil"???????????? \n\nYou can't question God!!!!! nor his word!!!!\n\nAnyway don't forget that God can make woe for the evil people. However I'm sure he won't do that. He is a loving father to all of us even through we doubt Him and try to find faults with God, His word and His creation.
641946
Does this mean that the first man in the holy book was the bastard son of a goddess? Who got her pregnant. I like this story. Was it one of the other Gods?
205007
who the hell is he..? where he come frm..?
804649
Apparently he's the son of Enoch, and the father of Lamech. He apparently reached the age of 969!!!xxx
504859
The closest thing that I can think of is that the Kabbalists label the middle piller of the Ein Sof (the 10 emanations of God) as being "The Son".  But they would make huge distinctions between this concept and how most Christians would see "the Son".
687774
Prophecies to Identify the Messiah, Which Jesus Does Not Fulfill:\n\n1) Matthew 1:23 says that Jesus (the messiah) would be called Immanuel, which means "God with us."  Yet no one, not even his parents, call him Immanuel at any point in the bible.\n\n2) The Messiah must be a physical descendant of David (Romans 1:3 & Acts 2:30).  Yet, how could Jesus meet this requirement since his genealogies in Matthew 1 and Luke 3 show he descended from David through Joseph, who was not his natural father because of the Virgin Birth. Hence, this prophecy could not have been fulfilled.\n\n3) Isaiah 7:16 seems to say that before Jesus had reached the age of maturity, both of the Jewish countries would be destroyed.  Yet there is no mention of this prophecy being fulfilled in the New Testament with the coming of Jesus, hence this is another Messiah prophecy not fulfilled.
208223
I THINK IT WAS SOMEONE CALLED SHEMUS.. I THINK HE WOULD.\n\nhow are you going to pick a  answer to all your questions..
237303
(m)\n\nABRAHAM\n\nThis name may be viewed either as meaning "father of many" in Hebrew or else as a contraction of ABRAM and Hebrew hamon "many". The biblical Abraham was originally named Abram but God changed his name (see Genesis 17:5). He led his followers from Ur into Canaan, and is regarded by the Jews as being the founder of the Hebrews through his son Isaac and by the Muslims as being the founder of the Arabs through his son Ishmael. A famous bearer of this name was Abraham Lincoln, the American president during the American Civil War.