I think  violating rules is very interesting than obeying,.......... true?
470249
I disagree. I my experince. Reason people break the rule is becuase they cant win any other way. Ponder this thow rules are ristrictions enacted and enforced by individuals or private comp. ect. laws are differrent. Laws are inacted by Legislative body or gov. entity. Now im going to get deep with you. No one can enact or enforce rules that conflict with laws set by the gov. body. So most of the time no one is really breaking any rule because they confict with gov. laws. most of the time
155004
By not wanting to conform to stringent rules society says we have to obide by when they make no sense.  By wanting to do or say or believe something that society says you can't.  By wanting to be different and make a statement all your own.  By wanting to be an individual instead of part of the heard.  By wanting to be a leader rather than a 'sheep'.  Your own uniqueness as opposed to the mold they want you to fit into.  That is what makes you a rebel.\n\nIs being a rebel bad? nope!  Some of our greatest artists, musicians, thinkers and educators were rebels.  They did what people said they couldn't.  Rebelling isn't bad.  Stand back and let them.  They are finding themselves.
495947
i am intrigued by your idea of LOGIC!!! interesting
578569
Yes I think that is a very good idea, and yet we do have something called "THE GOLDEN RULE", that is uniformly a part of every religion of the world.\nJust a reminder of the definition: "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you". (exception) Buddhism: "Do not do unto others as you would not have them do unto you".\nYet, your point is well taken, that it is beyond the moral capacity of most individuals and governments to NOT follow "The Golden Rule" or be Meddlesome.\nQuite frankly, I'm tired of it just as I suspect you are!
1003245
I think it is the fact that I am entirely too principled to dare compromise those principles. Irrespective of the consequences, I simply will not yield on something that is so fundamental to who and what I am. My core principles of personal morality, integrity and honour define me. So even though my life would doubtless be easier and my social calendar more full if I'd simply relax, retreat and sit on the fence instead of standing up to be counted, I will not do so. If I needs must fight for what is right, I shall do so. And if that fight should cost me my very life, I shall do so just the same.
518983
No, we should understand a rule of universe that is so simple no one gets it: for every action there is a reaction. The more we interfere there, the more they will interfere here in the future.\n\nWe are a cancer to ourselves.. or is that Bush and his corporate masters are a cancer to us??
252430
This is the way I view things.  I wasn't around when they made the laws therefore I don't think it's fair that I have to abide by the ones I don't agree with.  If I feel like a law needs to be changed or if I want to make something made legal that isn't then I will try for it.  I will fight and get petitions and go to meetings for my cause.  However, if I still don't get my way I'll do what I want. I will continue to do illegal acts or whatever the circumstance may be.  I would never put anyone in harm's way but if I feel there is a stupid law I shouldn't have to abide by then I don't.  I may have to suffer the consequences but I will fight for my beliefs.
819341
obey me? uhh...i duno :P
633506
What's the point in having a law if you don't intend to enforce it?  Of course it can be enforced - it's a matter of getting sufficient resources and having the WILL to enforce it!  Which seems to be sadly lacking ... until election time ...
870569
It could be more interesting if the yahoos would stop the violating crap!
151488
yes, because vigilance balances man's tendency to abuse not only his liberties but others as well. Vigilance is all that keeps the world from utter despotism.
360106
Had a book called 'breaking the rules', haven't got it now. Look for it on line, a poem or two might be published on line.
989738
I think true free speech is limitless, but if you say something false that incriminates or otherwise harms others, the fact that you harmed someone would be a violation of law.
24538
Weird huh?  Even weirder, if you carefully scrutinize an activity, that's exercising oversight.  But if you completely miss something, that's an oversight.\n\nIt's a wonder we communicate at all sometimes.
699806
You are too funny, but I completely agree with you.  I think people in this world should try minding their own business and celebrate whatever the hell they want to.  I do find that people take more pleasure out of minding everyone elses business instead of their own.
624359
Absolutely not! I am a police officer and I tell you that I would much rather prefer that everyone just obey the laws. When I make an arrest, depending on the circumstances, there are hours of paperwork, reports that have to be written, follow-up information to be gathered, court appearances, and countless hours of missed sleep (when you have to go to court, but work night shift).\n\nUsually the people that make these sort of comments are the ones that are breaking the law or hang out with the ones breaking the law. If you behave, I have no reason to mess with you. If you don't, you better believe I will do what needs to be done. It's that simple.
1152758
I think there is an element of truth in what you say.  But I think what is at the heart of what you are saying is tolerance.  If people could have a little more tolerance for people that were different than themselves then maybe there wouldn't be so much war/chaos.