Slim Shady for Senate?
459889
Yes why not im sure his b i t c h slapping amendment would be popular. and why not 50cent for president. for love of god im joking so calm down.
610457
he doesnt have to do shit. he is not up for reelction. the vp is not up for election... he has nothing to loose but gain lots of money for bigbiz... that is just the fact for the next 3 years..
867082
Tom Vilsack (at least I think that's how its spelled).  He's also announced he's running for the Democratic Presidential nomination.  Has anyone outside of Iowa ever heard of this guy?
796025
I agree about the Senate. There has been a clear shift to the Reps the last few days. I also think Lieberman will join the Rep caucus. House is also getting closer, but I still think that odds favor the Dems. I've only recently learned how many ex reps are running as Dems. I'm not sure what this means. I think we will be in for a very long night.
277034
I think so.  He thinks he's a Kennedy.  Like anyone gives a flying squirrel about his views on politics!
613337
It appears their title is simply "Senator."\n\nSee the site for the Nevada State Senate below.
1126560
I like Warner. I also like Evan Bayh. Recent polls put the 2 of them at the bottom of the pack as likely candidates, though, far behind Hillary, John Edwards, and John Kerry. None of the top 3 would bring in enough "swing voters" to win. Warner and Bayh are moderate enough to do it, though. Another possible, who few people mention, is Wesley Clark, who I like a lot, too (enough to write in his name on my 2004 ballot). I have yet to hear Mike Gravel's name mentioned, either, even though he is one of the few who have actually announced their candidacy. I like his stance on direct democracy and the FairTax plan.\nThe full list is:\nAnnounced candidates for the Democratic Party:\n\nSenator Joe Biden of Delaware \nSenator Christopher Dodd of Connecticut \nFormer Senator Mike Gravel of Alaska \n\nLikely candidates\n\nSenator Evan Bayh of Indiana \nRetired General Wesley Clark of Arkansas \nSenator Hillary Clinton of New York \nFormer Senator Tom Daschle of South Dakota \nFormer Senator John Edwards of North Carolina \nSenator Russ Feingold of Wisconsin \nSenator John Kerry of Massachusetts \nGovernor Bill Richardson of New Mexico \nGovernor Tom Vilsack of Iowa \nFormer Governor Mark Warner of Virginia\n \nOther potential candidates\n\nSenator Barbara Boxer of California \nGovernor Phil Bredesen of Tennessee \nGovernor Mike Easley of North Carolina \nFormer Vice President Al Gore of Tennessee \nRepresentative Dennis Kucinich of Ohio \nGovernor Joe Manchin of West Virginia \nSenator Barack Obama of Illinois \nGovernor Brian Schweitzer of Montana \nReverend Al Sharpton of New York\n\nedit:\nI would definately vote for Warner, Bayh, or Wesley Clark. I like John Edwards as a person, but he'd be a horrible president. I like Gravel a lot, too, but don't think he could get the moderate support my "big 3" could get. I think that there is too much distrust and/or hatred toward everyone in the "Washington crowd" for a Senator or Representative to take the White House. \n\nIf I had to pick one, it'd be Clark, simply because I know more about him than the others, having supported him in '04. But, once I read more into the candidates, my pick may change.
919254
Well that means if we win the house: We have just gained more than 16 congressional seats...That is always a great thing..... I will be blown away if we are able to win the senate...That would mean we held our current seats and picked up 6 more seats...Some of those are in the south...and one of them Is a African American running against a well funded millionaire...What funny is...Of all the people running for Senate...He would be elected in a Clinton like a landslide if he were White...I know that makes some of you uncomfortable to talk about Race and the south...and we have come along way...Just not quite there i am sad to say...But, I will work Oh so hard to help Mr. Ford...He is worthy and smart and articulate....It is really sad to think about the best candidate not being elected because of this....
407770
Based only on that one idea, I think that Foghorn Leghorn would make a much more qualified senator.  Or anything.  What is this guy, a Student Council senator?
730848
John Edwards is a great choice. Hillary will not run. Edwards could play the outsider wanting to make change. He also has no bad House or Senate record to use against him. I wonder if Democrats are that smart?
1109802
Wonderful!  I agree 100%!!!!  It's scary to think that a moderate Republican wont be elected in the red states and a liberal democrat will...well, just not be elected...  But, I think John McCain is a great Senator, and I think that Governor Pataki of NY is a great moderate Republican, who like us, is fiscally conservative and socially more moderate than most!!  Rudy G. is good too, but I don't really know what his aspirations are or the reason for them.
823553
How about Bob Casey, Jr (son of deceased Governor & current state treasurer) vs. Rick Santorum, prominent Republican senator from PA? That was very interesting, as Rick Santorum has always run on the "family values" platform, while Casey is also anti abortion, and also has a large family, is well respected as a good man of fine character. Santorum had nothing to use against Casey, except he had run in a number of elections (the same number sa Santorum, but for different offices).
1117983
Don't be so sure it won't be a Bush again. Brother Jeb is being touted as a possible Republican candidate. I'd say Hillary Clinton is the front-runner.
9508
From what I've seen so far, I'm hoping for Kansas Senator Sam Brownback (R).
956226
Don't bet on that.  He is an "Old School" conservative Democrat, which these days, they are hard to find.  Kind of like finding a Liberal Republican.  And BOTH do still exist!!!!!
550909
Sorry to say an honest man could not make it in.\nThe way we run campaigns does that-they are support by big time money(lobbyist-Oil-Pharmaceutical-AMA-ect). If we allowed only TV coverage-equal amounts paid by taxes-than favors would not be owed before they get in. Now it is money who gets them in and keeps them in. They support those who will not step on their toes and follow their lead on issues-or they cut them off and pay to have them humiliated. Sad but true. An honest man could not compete (we can't compete with their money) against this corruption. The media too is paid for. I wish an honest man could-but at this time not possible.\n\nAnd who ever said Hillary-please she has been in more scandals (not counting Bill's) than I could number. No not proved-but where there is "a ""lot" of smoke -there is fire. All were Greed related. Good thing she had money-to defend herself. You better get informed-plenty on Web-try it.
941582
hes not even in the senate office yet