can anyone tell me why president bush should not be impeached.?
470745
because he hasnt done anything that warrants an impeachment.
1345
Yes, I believe that he should.  He is a liar and a crook and every former President was impeached for thier misconduct, why not him?
167847
It's pretty clear that the president has done some illegal things, such as the warrantless wiretapping.  But only the congress can impeach the president, and as long as the majority of congress are Republicans, they are unlikely to do this.\n\nSo the only realistic way to get him impeached is to elect a majority of Democrats to congress in the fall 2006 election.
470862
We can't. This administration is really makin it hard. Sorry there is no answer. It would be alot easier if we Impeached BUSH though!
627976
First of all their are more Republicans in Congress than Democrats or Independents...so there's your answer to that! We have an unbalanced government, not to mention corrupt so why would they impeach Bush? They can't even pass a decent piece of legislation
171323
He has a better organized military and is using it for evil. He needs to be impeached even though it won't happen because of the majority in the senate. Then he needs to be arrested and tried in a world court for the crimes that he has commited.
245177
Because people tend to be STUPID!! I read an article today about how there are major rumblings regarding impeaching him...
1169202
I don't know how you people could honestly believe there is no need or cause for impeachment.  My God, this Administration has pretty much alienated us from other Countries, well, the middle east for sure, they have started unjust war, causing thousands and thousands of innocent men, women and children to lose their lives.  INNOCENT CHILDREN PEOPLE.  \n\nThe only way I could figure it, is all of you who are in favor, must of gotten the lucky tax cut like all of Bushies other friends.  The richie rich are the only ones who may even benefit the slightest bit from this holy war, but my God, is it really worth it?  Is it really worth the death of all these children?  For Pete's sake.\n\nMM5243, just out of curiosity, what would be grounds for impeachment according to you?
526619
I think it's all relative to perception.  Just the suggestion of impeaching President Bush has been suggested even before he got in office so that is nothing new.  Most people know you cannot impeach without just cause but, anger unchecked doesn't care about process.  They are going for the mob mentality.  This is the idea that just the suggestion of impeachment by enough influential people can bring it about.
328372
Because only Congress can impeach the president. And since congress just happens to be controlled by Bush's republican buddies, there aint a snowballs chance in hell of his getting impeached any time soon. Hes probably going to get away with all the lies and killing... Its depressing really.\n\n\npeace
27780
He's a horrible president.  He should be impeached for the following reasons:\n\nThe case for the impeachment of George W. Bush is made by a clear deductive argument: Any president who breaks the law and desecrates the Constituiton should be impeached. President Bush breaks the law and desecrates the Constitution. Therefore, President Bush should be impeached.\n\nConsider the evidence: The Eighth Amendment prohibits "cruel and unusual punishment," but Bush approves of extraordinary rendition, which allows suspects to be sent off to foreign regimes that condone cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment. He thus circumvents the Geneva Conventions forbdding torture.\n\nThe Fifth Amendment guarantees "due process of law," but the secret prisons operated overseas by the CIA totally ignore the "presumption of innocence," and thus run roughshod over this right.\n\nThe Fourth Amendment prohibits "unreasonable search and seizure" unless there is "probable cause," but Bush authorizes electronic eavesdropping on all American citizens without the court-approved warrants required for domestic spying. He also violates the "separation of powers" principle when he commands the executive branch of the government to operate secretly, and evade the checks and balances of the judicial branch.\n\nThe Fourth Amendment guarantees "the right of the people to be secure in their papers and effects," but Bush's reauthorization of the Patriot Act --- which allows the government access to medical and library records --- makes a shambles of this right to privacy. Since an Orvellian Big Brother might be spying on you, you had better not borrow Marx's "Communist Manifesto" from the local library.\n\nThe Sixth Amendment guarantees the right of the accused to "a speedy trial" and the right "to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation," but the prisoners at Guantanamo Bay are held for indefinite periods without legal representation, and without even hearing the charges against them.\n\nThe First Amendment ensures freedom of the press, but Bush mocks that freedom when he denounces the media as "shameful" for reporting his illigal domestic surveillance, and when he threatens an investigation of The New York Times.\n\nIf it is self-evident that any president who desecrates the Constitution should be impeached, and if it is proved by factual evidence that President Bush desecrates the Constitution, then it is inevitably true that he should be impeached.
973889
What people don't understand, is during the trial for impeachment, if Bush were found guilty, Cheney would be found guilty of C.A.H. also, and would Not become the next President. \n\nIs this why people are afraid to attempt to impeach Bush?  If an investigation began for impeachment process, we could all see Cheney is the puppet master. \n\nUnfortunately, the Dem's are having to battle a deeply embedded evil power that goes beyond Bush.  Things will only get worse. \n\n.
525266
This is my own personal thoughts.....  \n\n\nTop Reasons for Impeaching Bush\nWhat are the top reasons for impeaching Bush?\nIraq\nInvading Iraq without any threat to the U.S. \nLying about Iraqi WMD's to Congress and the American people \nCausing the deaths of over 2,000 U.S. troops and the maiming of over 10,000 more \nFailing to provide adequate equipment and armor to U.S. troops \nAllowing illegal torture and murder of prisoners \nCausing the deaths of 100,000 Iraqi civilians \nSpending $300 billion in just two years for an occupation that could last for decades \nLetting Halliburton steal billions through no-bid contracts \nUsing vast quantities of depleted uranium weapons that will poison Iraq now and for generations to come \nSeptember 11\nIgnoring countless warnings of an attack in the U.S. \nReading "My Pet Goat" during the attack \nLetting Osama Bin Laden escape from Afghanistan \nHolding no bureaucrat accountable for ignoring warnings \nDelaying and obstructing the 911 Commission investigation \nTurning Afghanistan into the world's largest opium producer \nTerrorism\nAllowing international terrorism incidents to quadruple and trying to cover up the facts \nFailing to secure our borders and ports to prevent terrorism \nCreating a new generation of terrorists through the invasion of Iraq and the killing of 100,000 civilians \nLetting terrorists buy high-powered weapons inside the U.S. \nLetting North Korea build nuclear bombs and missiles that can cross the Pacific Ocean \nRefusing to shut down Pakistan's nuclear weapons exports \nForeign relations\nTurning the world against the United States \nPreparing for another war with Iran \nSigning treaties that cost America jobs and undermine American laws \nEconomy\nLetting gasoline prices double at devastating cost to the economy while oil companies make record profits \nLetting corrupt companies like Enron steal billions from consumers and employees \nCutting taxes for the rich and turning a $5 trillion budget surplus into a $5 trillion budget deficit \nAdding trillions to the national debt, which our children and grandchildren will have to pay off with interest \nLetting millions of American jobs go overseas \nFreedom\nLetting bureaucrats wiretap Americans without a court order \nLocking up suspects for years without charges or trials \nArresting nonviolent protesters at Bush events \nPacking the courts with right-wing judges to outlaw abortion \nOrdering federal courts to interfere in the Terri Schiavo tragedy \nTaking away our right to sue corporations through class actions \nTaking away our right to declare bankruptcy under Chapter 7 and forcing middle-class Americans into debt slavery <http://debtslavery.org/> \nDemocracy\nStealing the Presidential elections of 2000 and 2004 \nRefusing to investigate the disenfranchisement of tens of thousands of voters in Florida and Ohio \nPromoting black-box electronic voting machines without paper trails \nEmbracing dictators in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Russia, and China \nOverthrowing democratically-elected leaders in Haiti and Venezuela \nEnvironment\nAllowing global warming, which will cause massive environmental damage \nAllowing more toxic mercury in the air and water \nAllowing oil drilling in wilderness areas \nScandals\nIllegally "outing" CIA agent Valerie Plame, an important anti-terrorism official \nLetting a gay male prostitute (Jeff Gannon) roam free in the White House \nPaying journalists to give favorable coverage to the administration \nRelying on an earpiece for answers during debates and press conferences \nGoing AWOL from the Texas Air National Guard in 1972 and covering it up ever since \nDefending the most corrupt Member of Congress (Tom DeLay)
886117
LETS IMPEACH BUSH!!\n\n\n\n(Even though he's done nothing to be impeached for)
1159846
one of the reasons is that the congress is run by the republicans. just imagine bush being a democrat  - he would've been impeached and fired probably, like, 5 years ago! \n\nand to think that clinton was nearly impeached for (not even) scr*wing an overly enthusiastic intern, while this "prez" is scr*wing the entire country, if not the world!\n\nmonica sweetheart, where r U?? (can someone PLEEEZ give him a bl*w job so we can impeach him?? lol)
736172
Because there are no justifications for impeachment.
872932
No, just because it is not logistically sound. Only the U.S. House can impeach a President, and there are enough votes there for it. But that does not remove him from office. He would then stand trial in the Senate, where a 2/3 majority vote would be needed to remove Bush from office. There are not enough votes in the Senate for that. Therefore, it would just be a waste of time for the Congress, and a waste of taxpayer money.