i am looking for a good book on C# and C#.net prefarably by indian author. even foreign authors will do?
473867
I recommend these books for learning C#
514022
well if you need an idea or two\nGet Up on C# and learn the the .net environment and Java can only help..
382913
XML is the newest but all .net language are mostly new\nlike C#,vb.net,all .net framework
255682
In C# you do not do inline assembler as C++ allows.\n\nYou can write dll very easily to be used as an assembly.\n\nC# is easier than C++ and C.  \n\nC is considered and unstructured language while C++ and C# are structured languages.\n\nC# introduced several features that handle a lot of work you'd have to do yourself in C++ and especially C.\n\nYou can use the GC, garbage disposal to handle memory management for you in C#.  If you ever had to do memory managementin C or C++ you know how time consuming and error prone the can be.\n\nC and C++ use headers where C# have a using to define the namespace of the classes that'll do that brunt work C and C++ has to do themselves such as Structure definitions, etc.\n\nC# has built in exception handling like Java only you are not required to throw e like in Java.\n\nC# offers properties to classes unlike Java.  This allows a class designer greater access control without decreasing functionality for a caller to use.\n\nC# work s for stricky win32 to .NET platform targeting.\n\nC# give you the power of C++ or aboubt 95% of it and the ease of VB and in targeting the .NET, you may find C# much easier for more advanced functions and dll calls.\n\nThe C# compiler will assign defaults to your variables referrence or pointer = null, and value = 0.  In C and C++ if you forget to init something that must be, like when using hooks, it'll compile and throw run time.  \n\nC# shelters you from tedious tasks like that and more.\n\nThere are great simularities between C# and C++, but C++ is the one with greater horsepower.\n\nC# contains a library than easily lets you go from web to net to desktop and back.  You can create a great smart clinet using VWD and C#.  So you can create classes that will port from your aps.net to your winforms apps with out re coding for the different platform.\n\nhttp://www.microsoft.com/Express can answer alot of questions on C#, try it and the C++ Express, free until Nov 6, 2006 and see for yourself.\n\nC# is really a great .NET compiler it seems designed for it.  But going into the opsys and targeting a specific platform can be done and it's actually easier than C++ and of C.\n\nMSDN and CodeProject have great referrences for beginners and the community is always great at anwering your questions.  There is no such thing as a dumb question, everyone's out there to learn and help one another learn.\n\nIt's so needed with how fast things change and how much there is to know.  One man is no islanad in development these days.
517962
If you are creating a chatting software like yahoo or msn messenger, then c# is ok if you know it well.I used Visual Basic and Visual C++. They are way lot easier. And The main problem with these softwares is that they need constant updating and debugging. So Give VB or VC++ a try ok as they are relatively easier to code and hence update and debug.
1006379
Those are programming languages. IT's not that easy to list all the details here. C#,ASP.NET and VB.NET are products of Microsoft. Why dodn't you try google!
908927
Go for Black Book for VB.\nComplete Reference for C++ is good.\nC++, Java and .Net are valued.
411773
Hi \n\nI am having 2-3 very good books on ASP.net, Please give me ur mail address I will sending u view email address:\n\nMy email address:yogesh_b_c@yahoo.com
344651
Hey, email me, LBphan@gmail.com, i might be able to help you out a bit, ive got some stuff for c++ and c# if youre curious, and ill give you whatever youre looking for free of charge.  my name is andy, by the way.
923648
I don't know about in your town..... but\nI'd start by getting some books on C#.net (the red WROX books are great!)\n\nIf you need assistance with a particular feature doa search looking for tutorials.  For example:\n\nC# DataSet Tutorials\n\nYou can also go to groups.yahoo.com and join some of the C# groups there.  They are great!
325585
you have to use the MVC++ and write the code is C++ codes, which looks similar to C. Nowadays, you can take advantage of C£ or C£.net, especially in you are going to deploy the application in Microsoft servers, like Microsoft SQL Server.\n\nIf your question is how to start from scratch when you know nothing about it, then you can buy programming books. I like the ones from Que Publisher and Sams. You can look for the books on Amazon.
2853
I always recommend Bjarne Stroustrup's "The C++ Programming Language", third edition.  It cuts straight to the meat of what is different between C and C++ instead of messing around with arrays of char like most tutorials do.
1143763
http://www.alibris.com/search/books/author/Devi,%20Shakuntala
472980
I agree that Visual Basic 2005 Step By Step, by Microsoft Press, is a good book. It focuses on teaching you how to perform specific tasks with Visual Basic .NET.\n\nIf you are more interested in learning how the language operates, I would suggest Beginning Visual Basic 2005 by Wrox Press.
105864
have u tried codeproject? i think its the best, i always use that website for .net tutorials.
436531
Get an old pc with MS BASIC on it, and then look around for a "Idiot's Guide..." book about BASIC. It's so out dated though... Why not learn C#, C++, J#...?
1087227
If you highly recommend it as a good translation of the Upanishad, I would gladly like to receive it. You needn't give it to me for free, I will gladly pay you for it and the shipping. The only version of the Upanishads I have is not very good at all. It only has five of the Upanishads in it and most of the book is "Translator's Commentary". The book was translated by a Christian missionary so the version tends to use Christian terminology (and the Translator's Commentary, which takes up half of the book, is full of "how the Upanishads compare to the Bible"). Its an awful translation! :(  I probably should have known better since the first version of the Bhagavad Gita that I bought was from the same company and it failed to translate a great deal of the Sanskrit (so in the middle of sentences would be Sanskrit phrases, but then no translation of what it meant). Thankfully the head organizers of the satsang I attended got together and got me a copy of the version they use (which is the one that was translated by Christopher Isherwood & Swami Prabhavananda). It's a very good version that I am so thankful to be able to read. That said, if your Upanishads was translated by Swami Prabhavananda then I have great hopes that the translation does a great deal of justice to the Upanishads and well worth the read. \n\nI don't feel comfortable posting my address, etc, here, but you can contact me for that (just click 'contact gabriel_zachary). I do live in the US (Oklahoma). I hope you find a good home for the book (even if not with me...afterall if God intends for me to have it, then it'll be, if not then atleast I now have heard of the book and if you give me your recommendation of it being a good book, then I won't hesitate to buy it at a later date)\n\nPeace be with you,\n\nNate