usability study in Digital library evaluation?
464585
Try these:\n\nJCDL'02 Workshop on Usability of Digital Libraries\nUsability of Digital Libraries at http://www.uclic.ucl.ac.uk/annb/DLUsability/JCDL02.html\n\nUsability Evaluation Techniques\nfor the Design of Interactive Digital Libraries \nhttp://www.cs.mdx.ac.uk/ridl/UET/\n\nEvaluating the usability of digital libraries through task-based tests\nhttp://dkc.jhu.edu/~teal/digilib/\n\nThere are lots more studies but these are freely available. Check with your local library to search databases that are not freely available on the internet.
34226
personailed search\nGUI\nAnd free tools
872282
analysis and evalution. \ngreater vocab\ncultural appreciation
477966
organization, free previews, direct keyword search, catagorization.
749936
'Usability' refers to how easily a user can use a device, website, or piece of software, etc.  This includes accessibility for those who are handicapped, ease of navigation, load time, page flow, etc.  There are gobs of information on the net concerning usability, but that's the skinny.
832700
Research it in the library
582595
Information accessability.
671359
A short form of documenting sources within the body of the paper
198436
the problem with digital libraries is they cant replace books in actual libraries and all the information those books hold.\n\nthe day when rely on computers for all our information is the day we sell our souls to technology because you cant hack and manipulate something that you can actually hold and see.
412024
Ok - these are just impressions.\n\nIntro:\nI found the scrolling title distracting. Everything else looks pretty clean.  If you're going to have any motion, I would put it with the brain graphic more than likely.\nA little hesitation when I went to go to next page - it's not exactly clear.  Continue should be under the main text -think "website for a real dummy" always - simple is best.\n\nNext event button doesn't work. So I clicked "Members," unsure of what that might be.  You might relabel it project staff or something similar so it doesn't look like it was a default tag, but that's probably a nitpicky point. \n\nMembers page:\nCrop the photo at the bottom - date stamps are not cool. Just bring it in tight around the group's shoulders. This text, "Dr: Yasser M. Kadah" needs help.  You'd be better off changing it to something like "Supervisor: Dr. Yasser M. Kadah" or at least putting a full stop (period) instead of a colon.  Lose the scrolling text again - everything else pretty clean, get photos of other project staff if you can but I completely understand having to put placeholders.\n\nProject Steps:\n\nOk, again the scrolling text needs to go.  Otherwise, get an English or Journalism person to go through the text - you've got some awkward syntax. The under construction pages - even when a page is under construction, be sure to link back to the source page just for visitor convenience.  You need to either open a pop-up for pages not on your site, or warn that the link goes to an external site.\n\nSchedule:\n\nUmm, not sure about this page - is there a reason for it?\n\nDownloads:\nAgain, a good proofreading - "useful" has only one L in it.  The scrolling bar is beginning to drive me insane.\n\nContact us:\n\nPretty clean, except instead of "Eng : Mohamed Sami" I would either spell out the word or use a full stop (period) rather than a colon.\n\n\nOverall, you've got a pretty clean design, since I was able to just nitpick it.  Other than a couple of places where navigation is unclear, just please, please, be rid of the scrolling "Brain Computer Interface."  The problem is that it is the only moving item in the entire website, so your eye tends to be drawn to it.  You'd probably be better off running an entirely static design.\n\n\nOh yeah - I'm running on a broadband hookup, newest version of IE.  Look at mine as the layman (read: most users!) version of a rundown.  Most site viewers are neither going to know nor care what code is in the site, so long as it works and looks good.  Do feed in the META tags as mentioned above, though, you will need them for the search engines to pick up on.
125896
Can you get 'Stumble upon?'  Also look at 'Vectorpark'!
334016
No, but I would like to check it out.\n\nHAHAHA Library humor!
501230
Try doing your own research for your college class...lol!\n\nAnastasi is interested in subcategorizing different kinds of validity to ensure increased effectiveness of testing (e.g. content validity may not ensure a useful score because of cultural validity considerations).\nGronlund focuses primarily on usefulness of results as the primary determination of vailidy.\n\nHere's something to get you started (I know about that evil writer's block problem...)...Just don't forget that APA format for your citation of these websites in the bibliography!\n\nhttp://www.burns.com/wcbcontval.htm\nhttp://www.gower.k12.il.us/Staff/ASSESS/4_ch2.htm\nhttp://teaching.berkeley.edu/bgd/quizzes.html\nhttp://cwx.prenhall.com/bookbind/pubbooks/linn/chapter4/objectives/deluxe-content.html
290947
um ask the librarian?
526785
none :-(, the first one clicked and deprived me of any experience that you wud have found useful
56355
willingness of the student to learn the material
664724
Well the Archive magazine that I know of is a software and hardware one! Which design were you talking about?