foreign policy of usa from1990 till 2006?
473110
New York Democracy Forum: How Can America Advance Democracy in the World\nAsia Society, New York, NY \nMarch 8, 2006 5:30 PM \n \nThe Foreign Policy Association, The National Endowment for Democracy and the Asia Society invite you to watch a New York Democracy Forum lecture on how America Can Advance Democracy in the World featuring Richard Holbrooke, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations.\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\nPress play to watch video or download below.\n\n\n\n\n\nSpeaker:\n\n\nRichard Holbrooke\n\n\nFormer U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations\n\n\n\nDate:\n\n\nWednesday March 8th, 2005\n\n\n\nLocation:\n\n\nAsia Society\n\n725 Park Avenue (at 70th Street) \n\nNew York, NY 10021 (map)\n\n\n\n\n\nRichard C. Holbrooke served in President Clinton's cabinet as the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations from 1999-2001. As Assistant Secretary of State for Europe (1994-1996), he was the chief architect of the 1995 Dayton peace agreement that ended the war in Bosnia. He later served as President Clinton's Special Envoy to Bosnia and Kosovo and Special Envoy to Cyprus while a private citizen. From 1993-1994, he was the U. S. Ambassador to Germany. He served as the Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs during the Carter Administration (1977-1981) when Sino-American relations were normalized in December, 1978. Ambassador Holbrooke is currently Vice Chairman of Perseus, LLC, a leading private equity firm, and Chairman of the Asia Society.
172737
go to www.usatoday.com...they have the latest world news!
554263
Get it through your heads.  Israel has controlled American policy since 1948.  It's the "New World Order".
803868
Try this:\nhttp://www.cdi.org/issues/usmi/\n\nKeep in mind, this is a budget REQUEST made in 2000 for the 2001 fiscal year. Also, the military fiscal year ends in October.
13353
None - There were a bunch, but Bush reversed about 50 years of progress by pulling the USA out. \n\nI figure <and I'm only figuring> that we will never ever ever ever reach full international agreements. If you mean only the countries that are most likely to try to bomb others, like Iran or the USA, we will have to wait for some competent leaders with competent foreign policies. \n\nDon't get me wrong, though, many countries have made agreements. But I think many people will agree with me that without the USA in peace agreements with you, there is probably no point in attempting world peace.\n\nEDIT: I hope this wasn't a question in your homework. Don't use this :P
393664
Per year? Or since 1776?
859238
refer \nhttp://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/5610
96052
2005\n\nI hope this site helps you...\n\nDon
967504
Where do you begin. Good luck with that one!!!\nLook at things like how 9-11 was handled, the war in Iraq, the political scandals, etc. That should tell you what you need to know.
27273
The US Policy on the Congo during this period is one that is complex and not very easy to define. In the early 50's the US policy towards emerging nations was to support Europe first pertaining to colonial issues and to maintain order and secure strategic resources. This agenda came into question in the mid 50's, as the US began to realize that as African countries tried to gain more freedoms (economic, political, social), many European nations were resistant to these measures - most notably Belgium. The US also realized this resitance would most likely result in growing civil unrest in the colonies.\nThough the US was receptive to change in African colonies, the US did nothing to prevent the overthrow and eventual murder of Congo's first president, the democratically elected Patrice Lumumba - having suspected, via intellengence, that he was a communist. Let it also be known that the UN and Belgium did nothing to prevent this either. In fact, Belgium supported the military coup led by Joseph Mobutu.\nThe tacit support of the removal of Lumumba from office, led to the to reign of one of the most brutal dictators in history - that of western (Belgian/European/US)- supported Mobutu Sese Seko.\nIt is difficult to summarize the US foreign Policy in the Congo during this period. While indirectly involved in events going on at this time, it is primarily Belgium that had the most influence over Congo and its future.\n\nIf you are interested in learing more you should check out "In the Footsteps of Mr. Kurtz" by Michaela Wrong,  "King Leopold's Ghost" by Adam Hochschild, and "The Troubled Heart of Africa: A History of the Congo" by Robert Edgerton
391058
Afghanistan,against Russian invaders.\nthey fought for a full decade!\nwatch out AMERICA.
926393
The legacy of Bush's foreign policy is a complete failure.\nHe has proven time and again to be obtuse and incapable of understanding intricate international political winds. He has proven on many occasions to be caustic on the sensitivities of other Nations, only willing to negotiate if it serves his interest even at the expense of the American people. America is an important country and her people do not necessarily reflect the ideological path he has chosen. The next president will have many fences to mend.
909355
Foreign Policy--\nToughen sanctions on NKorea until they stop counterfeiting and talking about nukes.\nGradually move US troops to Iran.\nGive Iraq 3 months.  Promise rebuilding aid if they comply.  Withhold aid if they don't.\n\nSocial Policy--\nReform public education.  Break up the NEA.  End tenure.  Take all origin theory OUT.  Expel children whose parents won't make them follow the rules.   Teach responsibility with rights.\n\nMake Social Security need based now.  As it should have been 20 years ago.\n\nTie corporate tax cuts to employee incentives (medical, childcare, etc.)\n\nSanctions on Mexico, tied with funds, to make them fix their economic problems and to make them stay home.\n\nLimit welfare recipients to two children (males and females), after that, sterilization (males and females).  Welfare until the youngest child is in kindergarten.  Stop rewarding unmarried mothers--make welfare independent of marital status.\n\nSafety nets for the working poor--medicaid, childcare.  So the welfare parents will choose to work.
625867
This smells like a research paper you should be doing your own research for.  I'll just say the foreign policy of the 1950's was totally dominated by worldwide struggle with the USSR for allies and hegemony.  Everything else was secondary.  On top of the perpetual war footing and a major shooting war in Korea there was the threat of nuclear holocaust.  And the American imagination has latched onto the idea that this decade was innocent and carefree, a Golden Age that makes our own times dark and frightening in comparison.  This grotesque glorification of the past plays right into the hands of the current regime, which manipulates fear to stay in power and strip away our constitutional rights.
348311
The USA has gone since 1990, that is five in a row.
703108
Perhaps you're thinking of the Monroe Doctrine, issued by Monroe in 1823. The Doctrine claimed the Western Hemisphere pretty much under the control of the U.S., and that we would defend other countries in it against intrustion by European powers. \n\nThere's also the "Good Neighbor" policy under FDR, which is similar.
105016
1788\n\nhttp://www.mainlesson.com/display.php?author=synge&book=seapower&story=first