Who do you think would win in a 1-1 game t-mac or ray allen?
460511
t-mac, he has a better everything than ray allen except for the long shots, which he is still very good at.
984738
I don't think Oakland will beat anybody, anywhere.\nSteady Eddie- WTF is Herman Moore? How can he be coach of the year if he doesn't exist?
898943
Go with Kitna...I really like the matchups in this game for detroit. Expect Roy Williams to have 100+ and a couple TD's tomorrow.
990394
It can't be Dirk as you said because that photo looks bald plus Dirk drives more standing up.\n\nI think it's Tracy McGrady. T-Mac drives and dribbles exactly like that. But his head isn't really shaped like that...\n\nIt can't be Steve Nash because his hair would be sticking out at least a little. But then again that does look like Steve when he's about to make a pass...\n\nIt can't be LeBron because he wears a headband and I don't see a headband sticking out in that photo.\n\nI would say Chauncy because his head is shaped like that but he dribbles NOTHING like that. He always has good fundamental dribbling.\n\nCONCLUSION: I'll take a wild guess and say it's Steve Nash because of his back to back MVPs and the photo looking like his exact passing motion when he's driving.
828034
Ray Charles...KO...first round....No Brainer.....Stevies a good guy, but don't stand a chance in the ring !!!
361786
One team is loaded with guards..and the other team is loaded with big men.  It really depends on the tempo of the game.  In a running game, I would think Team 1 would win.  In a half-court set, I would think Team 2 would win.
737690
gotta go with the Mavs....not bc they went to the finals last year, but bc the spurs r growing older by the second and the rockets have not only showed they r weaker but my god r they inconsistant....one night tmac torches a team for 40 the next night he scores 14 and they get blown out...plus yao needs some swagger...he needs to play more physical, the final reason the mavs win is the freak of nature himself....DIRK, the dude is a monster....rebounding skill slike a center, scoring abilities like a premiere guard....and a match-up nightmare....just ask the spurs lol they haaaate him
537016
It depends if T-Mac gets better.
495381
Randy foye because he is a  Combo guard plays with feistiness he will make opportunities happen Not afraid to throw his body into traffic and play with the big boys Not only tough, but athletic Great first step, excellent leaper Supreme finisher and rebounder at 6-3  Has a fearlessness that allows him to take the big shot \n\n \n            Who said they definetly have enough PG's. They got one good one Raefer Alston who hasnt done much since he left streetball. Bob Sura who is terrible. And David Wesley who hasnt ever been good at nothing but 3's. \n\n       Randy Foye can play both Guards and that is what Houston Needs. T-mac plays the Small Forward. And a lot of people are saying houston needs a power forward. They signed Stromile Swift who is a young athletic power forward. He might have had a terrible year but dont write him off. So did T-Mac injury or no injury. I think Yao had his best year when he wasnt injured.\n\n            Final Randy Foye
928593
Westbrook easily.  Indy run defense has been very poor.  Packers actually do a decent job of defending the run (terrible against the pass though so expect a big day for Hasselbeck).
963046
Westbrook.  Jones is losing carries and they will look to throw more to see if Tony Romo is the real deal.  Also, the Skins D really sucks and Mcnabb hasn't been bright the past weeks.  I would defintly go with Westbrook.
158754
Hmmmmm.....they're fairly even. Pierce has been a slightly better scorer, but that's only because T-Mac didn't get a lot of playing time in his Toronto years - over the last 5-6 seasons, T-Mac has the edge. T-Mac has a better assist-to-turnover ratio and a few more blocks, while Pierce has been healthier and has more steals. They're comparable field goal shooters, but Pierce is a bit better from long-range and the free throw line, though he commits more fouls.\n\nThe statistical edge goes to T-Mac. I love my Kansas players, but I have to give credit where credit is due.
22289
Seattle or Indy, depending on who was at home.  I think that Peyton Manning's "no-huddle" offense would have a helluva time communicating at Qwest Field because of the 12th man.  That said, either team could win at either place, but I give the advantage to the home team.
848808
I'd have to say Ray Allen.  There are a lot of other great shooters from the past such as Larry Bird, Walter Davis, Reggie Miller, Rick Barry, Isiah Thomas, Kevin Johnson, Jim Paxson, John Stockton, etc.  And even now, Michael Redd, J.J. Redick, Richard Hamilton, Allan Houston, Kyle Korver, etc.  I've watched all of em', but Ray Allen has the "purest shot".  If you just watch him, his shot just looks so easy.  His release is perfect and fairly quick.  And looking at it, it just looks so natural, a thing of beauty.  Not only does his shot look nice, but he has one of the highest FG%'s.  Ray Allen, the "purest" shooter in nba history.
621869
In the NBA, Ray Allen. In college basketball (going into the NBA), J.J. Redick although I don't like him personally.
805867
M. Morris because it is a home game and they are playing against Oakland\nI would also go with your guy from NY Giants because they are playing Houston
716460
1 word: Macaca\n\nif allen would'nt have said that, he would have prolly won