If 40 out of a sample of 180driver preferatransmissionoverautomatic,abouthowmanydriverspreferapopulationof900?
468216
Several people have answered your questions before, and you should use the method that they have used.  If the proportions remain the same.\n\n40/180 = x/900\n\nSolve for x.\n\nDo your own homework, seriously.
70984
90-180, depending on how its brewed.
491871
Many different resources are available to you. \nApproximately 3,220\n\nTop hit: See below.
1014357
about 120,000 nowadays
551860
Not sure what you are asking....but exhuast header will vary depending on the engine and type of header.  Typically you may gain up to 8-10 % performance.
220756
it depends on migration or...\nimigration rates.
257309
Yeah many many many people are into them.  I had to get rid of my 69 though.  Darnet.  As a matter of fact I would buy one of yours if you were near Houston.  Heh...
773298
Depends what specific area you are talking about but i think it is in excess of 560,000 people.
1048519
a poll is just a majority of all people. asurvey is usualy asking a certain group of people. ithink.
14525
positive 40 would be the answer
979806
Are you asking for sheer number or percentage of a group?  Your question is unclear.
1099213
Yes.  The first one below has 8755 answers.\n\nHowever, it used to be that you could not have more\nthan one hundred.  See the second link for info on that.
63116
69.\n\nOkay, okay... it's useful on a race car so the number reads the same from all perspectives from the track, and even if the car gets turned over. Geez...
660232
I am sorry that I am unable to support my answer with direct polling and a supposed credible source - but I will say this - the answer given by the WSJ that "Americans tend to drive more miles in high-milage cars, " etc... seems very slanted in the first place. \n\nThinking about it logically, the purpose of owning a higher fuel economy automobile is so that we CAN drive further for less - but that would not mean that one would start driving outside of their normal routine. Example: Driver A has an older, lower economy automobile. Driver A works Monday thru Friday and commutes 15 miles each way to and from work. With the lower economy automobile, Driver A is getting 22 MPG (Average) and therefore is consuming 6.81 gallons of fuel for the weekly commute. \n\nIn addition to The weekly work commute, driver A goes to and from the store on the weekend, and takes a small drive - for a total of 50 extra miles, therefore consuming an additional 2.27 gallons of fuel. (9.08 gallons consumed total)\n\nDriver B owns a higher economy automobile. Driver B works Monday thru Friday and commutes 15 miles each way to and from work. With the higher economy automobile, Driver B is getting 35 MPG (Average) and therefore is consuming 4.28 gallons of fuel for the weekly commute. \n\nIn addition to the weekly work commute, Driver B goes grocery shopping on the weekend, and takes a long drive - for a total of 150 extra miles. Consuming an additional 4.28 gallons of fuel. ( that is a total of 8.56 gallons of fuel consumption)  \n\nThe above is a rediculously surmised argument - based on numbers that I am sure would be impossible to actually total - and without any real ability to monitor consumption - but the results are similar to the truth anyways - higher fuel economy undoubtably means lower fuel consumption - math does not lie - but PEOPLE DO - and the WSJ supposition is NOT based on any reasonably factual study - refute their basis, don't waste time looking for an equally foolish and slanted study to do the work for you.
129772
They can hit 120+ in some straight aways. Rallying is pretty intense. You gotta have balls to do that sport.
203692
got the right data...\n\n\nAs on 23-03-2006 \nregistered ones \n\n66,987,532\n\ncheck the link....
133639
What kind of car. Did they replace it 90W-140 or just 140.\n 90W-140 .\n If you have a Porsche or older aircooled VW and they put in straight 140 you will not be able to shift it in Winter