Is it true that National Archives misplaced JFK's brain?
412254
That's whats supposed to have happened but it is possible someone took them for a keepsake. Cant tell you why they would.
521494
Please bear in mind, while original photos do still retain some intrinsic value, advances in technology which make it possible to recreate photos have taken away a lot of the re-sale value of such memorabilia. Also, there is a great deal of discussion that is targeted at bringing down the Kennedy mystique back to earth. Also, auction sites make it easier to sell such items, but it also lets people know there are more resources available as well.
1137077
It's true, the FBI removed them from the scenes and made them "Never found"\n\nOr the black boxes may have been removed beforehand, just to make it seem as if they had been destroyed.
327154
I've been doing my own research for a long time now.  As far as "asking questions that can't be proven"...every question I bring up indeed COULD be proven if the evidence were not destroyed.  Almost EVERYTHING related to what would amount to a fair forensic investigation as to the causes, circumstances, and material evidence of 9/11 has been thoroughly destroyed or completely sealed to the public.\n\nThink about that.  The largest mass-murder in US history and there is NO forensic evidence to be had by the public or independant investigators.  All scrap material from the WTC was carted off and sold to India as scrap without any examination.  Wreckage from all flights met with the same fate, except what little independant photographers gathered, which is compelling for the fact that the engines recovered were the wrong model in 3 out of 4 cases.  Four thousand witness statements have been sealed (4000!) and any first-hand witness that discredits the official story have been debunked as either un-patriotic or crazy.  FAA records and the clearest security video photage have either been destroyed or sealed.\n\nCongress authorized a total of $11 million to investigate the events of 9/11, but almost no money made it to investigators.  In comparison, Bill Clinton's bj merited $40 million in funds to investigate.  Money well spent?  Let me re-phrase that...$40,000,000 on an act of marital impropriety for one man and $3666 per murder of another.\n\nTo top it all off, the few FBI investigators assigned to this ALL have blown the whistle to say that they were given no resources to investigate, were stopped cold by orders from above when investigating certain avenues, and were told to lie on their final reports or the reports were changed/edited after they were filed.\n\nPropogandists count on a person to overcome logic with emotion, and in 9/11 they have succeeded admirably.  Anyone (including 8 years myself) who has been in the military will tell you they have been lied to more than once to achieve some "motivation".  There isn't much need in government culture to cover up anything, just a "don't ask questions and don't talk to the press" attitude, most people like to keep their retirement pension.  This video is just the tip of a VERY big iceberg.
676940
Oswald could not have been the only one that shot Kennedy. Police recovered a 1940's model Manlicher Carcano bolt action rifle from the sixth floor of the TSBD building. In theory, this was the rifle Oswald was purported to have used. In reality, the weapon was barely capable of accuracy at 5o yards, let alone having 3 accurate shots fired from it in less than six seconds. The head shot Kennedy received caused his head to move backwards and to his left. The whole back of his skull was blown out. Close study of the Zapruder film shows this in graphic detail. As for 9/11...........well, Hitler burned the Reichstag in order to implement his plan. Nothing is impossible for desperate leaders
612923
The warren commission was wrong, It could have been the Cubans as we tried to kill Castro only he succeeded, It could have been the FBI hoover was a cross dresser and the only reason Kennedy didnt expose him was, he turned the white house into a brothel, It could have been the military industrial complex, Kennedy was against our involvement in Viet Nam. Film at the time shows people dropping when they heard shots from behind the fence on the grassy knowl. Oswald was CIA and may have been involved that is why another CIA jack ruby killed him to cover it up. We as Americans deserve to know the truth
666808
No. The way we remember things is not just localized to one specific section in the brain, but it is a combination of neural networks essentially. Even if it was localized it would be very difficult to make someone specifically forget this without hurting other memories. Plus at present time drugs cannot be used to work locally in one specific section of the brain...even though nanotechnology will help us come closer to that goal.
113285
Well JFK was notified by a crying Jeane Dixon on the steps of the White House that he was cursed, and should NOT go to Dallas.  The arrogant prick died, so there ya go.  He had ample warning of his impending doom and still died.  The only way psychics can save people is if the persons believe in what is being said, and choose to alter their paths. \n\nAnd again, if a disaster is avoided by taking a different path, you will never know, because the disaster never happened.  \n\nI just found a website that says she did NOT predict JFK's death, so I guess there will be disagreement about that.  Since I was not alive in 1963, I can't really say from personal experience.\n\nAnother thing I need to mention about metaphysical advice--there are so many darn quacks out there. You must be careful.  I recommend being very clear in a relationship with the supreme being, or God, or whoever it is you think is at the core of the universe, to help you find an adviser that can truly help you.
929336
Every time I see that guy I think about Chappaquiddick!\n\nAfter the wreck (car off bridge, late at night, female passenger died by drowning) Kennedy got out of the car and water, walked miles to friends house, got cleaned up, rested, and his lawyer called the police in the morning. They eventually determined that he was confused! \n\nI wonder how many confused men and women are incarcerated, who were confused?
575927
This is one of those coincidences that isn't a coincidence at all -- it's simply wrong. John Kennedy did have a secretary named Evelyn Lincoln (who may or may not have warned him about going to Dallas), but one searches in vain to find a Lincoln secretary named Kennedy. (Lincoln's White House secretaries were John G. Nicolay and John Hay.) \n\nThe more important point is that since Presidents are frequent recipients of assassination threats, they rarely make any public appearances without somebody's warning them of potential danger. Only on the extemely rare occasions when a tragedy actually occurs do we later take note of the warnings; in all other cases the failed "prophecies" are quickly forgotten. (Lincoln received "an unusual number of letters about plots to kidnap or assassinate him," said to have numbered at least eighty, yet none of those plots were enacted.) Nor does anyone think to mention other attempts at kidnap or assassination that were not preceded by any recorded warnings to the victims. (Lincoln was shot at on at least one other occasion.) \n\nYes, Lincoln was warned not to go to Ford's Theatre by persons concerned for his safety, just as he had been warned not to visit Richmond a week earlier, and just as he had been warned not to attend his own inauguration in 1861. Obviously, only one of the myriad of warnings he received throughout his four years in office was on the mark. Likewise, Kennedy was warned not to visit San Antonio the day before his trip to Dallas (and undoubtedly before a host of other appearances as well), but only the last warning he allegedly received is considered significant, because it coincidentally happened to come true. As Jeane Dixon and other "psychics" have demonstrated, if you make enough predictions, one of them is eventually bound to come true -- just as a stopped clock is also right twice a day.
1017861
The National Archives holds the original if that's what you mean.
150250
I am thinking the C I A took him out as  payback for the Bay of Pigs.  I have acutally walked the parade route and worked the tactical sniping exercise in my head.\nLets see, a cheap bolt-action rifle, equipped with a scope with poor eye relief against a target initially 30 yards away\ndriving on a curving road and accellerating beyond 35 mph.\n\nI knew a Marine Vietnam sniper with 45 confirmed kills that said HE could not have done it.  The Zapruder film seems to indicate he was killed by a round that struck the FRONT of his head.  The autopsy photos are on line. \n\nI am guessing this was a rouge project by people close to Allen and John Foster Dulles.  Had a grandfather that said in Nov 1960, If I was Jack Kennedy, I would never get another night's sleep knowing I stood between LBJ and the White House...but I don't think Johnson was involved. \n\nRightwing Cubans miffed after the failure of the Bay of Pigs may have helped.  Organized crime bosses did not like the Kefauver hearings either.
664614
By HOPE YEN, Associated Press Writer 5 minutes ago \nWASHINGTON - \nPersonal data, including\nSocial Security numbers of 26.5 million U.S. veterans was stolen from a Veterans Affairs employee this month after he took the information home without authorization, the department said Monday. \nLast year, more than 260,000 veterans could not sign up for services because of cost-cutting. Audits also have shown the agency used misleading accounting methods and lacked documentation to prove its claimed savings."\n\nWell, this administration appears to have issues without having anything stolen.\n\nThose in the service 1975 and after are many military who were in quite a few skirmishes that the government had, including those in Iraq.\n\nI hope they have hard copies somewhere, which they probably don't. Proving a negative is going to be hard for a lot of men who are eligible for benefits. How do you get benefits if you can't prove you are eligible for them? It will be up to the serviceman to prove, Hate to be them.\n\n26.5 MILLION RECORDS from 1975 to present
244578
I have... and, frankly, there's nothing then left to look up.  Worth noting, I only retained the knowledge that I'd accessed them...  not all the information iself...  and the end result of the knowledge which is, effectively, that it all makes good sense...  An encouraging memory on a day to day basis.
143970
No one has said that the bullet was not fired by Oswald's rifle. That's pretty clear. The question is, did that bullet hit JFK AND Governor Conolly, or just Governor Conolly, and no ballistics tests are going prove or disprove that. Conspiracy theorists believe that JFK was actually killed by another bullet, fired by a man on a grassy knoll, but that the government covered it up by saying that the bullet that hit Conolly had killed JFK. That the bullet does not exist of course fuels this conspiracy theory all the more, despite the fact that if the theory is wrong, it shouldn't have existed in the first place.
429537
After  JFK's failed attempt to kill Castro with the Bay of Pigs invasion and his attempt to get the American Mafia's help, Castro retaliated using a patsy given to him by the Russians.  I seen this on a German TV documentary...they tried to interview the Cuban agent who met with Oswald in Mexico City prior to the assasination...but his answers only created more doubt...
251892
Lee Harvey Oswald DID kill John F. Kennady, and this is why:\n\nThe Warren Commision conclusively proved that JFK was shot by a lone shooter, who was Lee Harvey Oswald. The Magic Bullet Theory answers conspiracy theorists' ideas of a second or third shooter, and it is definitly true because the USSS (United States Secret Service) has proved several thousand times over that the shot could easily happen. They have their own range that emulates the shooting exactly.\n\nMarine shooting requirements are very difficult. In order to make Marksman, the lowest decoration for rifle qualification, you need to hit and engage targets hundreds of yards out with a heavy rifle. At the time of Lee Harvey Oswald's service in the Marines they were probably using the M1 (a heavy rifle) or maybe the M14 (I don't know what years he was in the Marines). Thus, just because Lee Harvey Oswald couldn't qualify doesn't mean he was a bad shot, necessarily. Just to become a Marine you have to qualify...maybe he had a bad day.\n\nWitnesses claim they saw smoke rising from tall grass not far from JFK's motorcade, and some claim they heard more than three shots. But witnesses have proved time and again in criminal courts to be faulty, as their minds invent what their senses cannot divine. Countless times robberies have been remembered by people incorrectly, and security cameras see things right. \n\nIf JFK were assasinated by Carlos the Jackal (a famous terrorist), the Cuban Secret Service, or the Mafia, as the popular theories go, they would have used supressed weapons with flash supressors as well. All those forces are professionals and do have access to such weapons. There is no reason trained assasins wouldn't use weapons that could prevent their detection.\n\nJust because the rifle was poorly made doesn't mean that it's some kind of toy. Oswald was shooting downward from an angle, which is a fairly easy shot because the round goes low, not high, as is the problem with shooting upright or prone.