which is correct? Work in progress, or working progress?
395924
work in progress sounds better, working in progress doesn't sound right.So Work in progress in my prospective sounds grammatically correct.
696956
It is grammatically correct if you mean to see that the pattern can be been seen around the clock, but just barely, and that hasn't changed for a while.\n\notherwise it's very awkward and not grammatical.  Depending on what you mean, it should be"\n\nPatterns can still be seen around the clock\nPatterns can just be seen around the clock\nPatterns can be seen around the clock
892348
Gaining?  Obtaining?  Receiving?  Taking?\n\nDepends on the usage...\n\nHope that helps!
42288
Do you mean a website or a work site?
935037
It is correct according to MS Word spelling and grammar check.  Use it...  Tools >Spelling and Grammar from the standard MS Word tool bar.  \n\nThey both will pass the test grammatically, but the first makes most sense.
406152
Docagahan and Dr. Doom are both correct.\n\nHow long have you been doing this type of work?\nHow long have you been engaged in this line of work?\nHow long have you been working in this field? \nHow long have you been working in this position?
102125
No, it does not sound right. It could be corrected as:\n\na. He is/was not able to perform\n\nb. He could not perform\n\nc. He is/ was unable to perform
616491
work = force * distance\n\nWork done is the product of the force exerted and the distance moved.\nno force, no work\nno distance, no work
379436
In response to your first question, the use of the word "their" in this case is quickly becoming colloquially acceptable in replacement of "his or her" or "your."  This has always been an awkward point in the English language.\n\nIn the second case, the use of "since" implies that the action is still taking place, but the use of "were" implies that the action has been completed.  Therefore, if these cultures still exist and are agricultural, "have been" is correct.  If these cultures no longer exist, then "since" must be eliminated in favor of something more clear.
1177241
the first one was in past tense and the other one is in past progressive tense\nthe meaning is the same. the difference is how the sentence was constructed
451500
Both are correct. You can use either of these.
796178
they're working on it................I mean a definition of "is."
1033980
I think it's right...seems like you have just replaced should with ought....and if you say it with should it would be grammatically correct, and since ought is a word...I would say YES!
891030
"work done through" what?  Your questions doesn't make any sense.
406686
Accomplishments?\n\nWell, you have your work cut out for you. Good Luck.
640980
Both sentences are grammatically correct when examined alone.\n\nThe first is talking about a situation in the present.  You would use this expression when you give a gift to someone.\n\nThe second is talking about a future situation.  You would use this expression when you were talking about a movie that the other person plans to see in the future.
699878
pretty much perfect, i would change only the following:\n\nI am [removed also.  no need for it, since you have not expressed any other concerns previous to this sentence.] concerned for the safety of anyone who may be in the building at other times. There are potential dangers in a building that is under construction, [add comma] especially if the construction crew doesn’t know you are in the building.\n\nIn order to be sure the construction crew is aware of your presence [you used the phrase "in the bulding" to finish the previous paragraph.  avoid repetition.], I am asking you to please [added please.  it's both cordial and professional to say please when requesting something from employees.]sign in with the security office during non-business [added hyphen] hours. In addition, the construction crew has requested that {added "that."  grammatical.] you use the front entrance, as opposed to the east or west entrances.\n\n\nhope this helps.