What does Jesus like on his hamburger? Does he prefer a vanilla or strawberry milkshake?
407390
Jesus kept Kosher so he wouldn't have a shake with a hamburger.\n\nTorah clearly states no milk and meat together.
960975
Strawberry Margaritas are my favorite, followed by other sweets like a Singapore Sling, or a Long Island Iced Tea. If I'm eating, I usually just have Jack and Coke.
707430
HERES A REAL ANSWER - \nSalt is for flavour ENHANCING! when i put salt on my hot chips - it tastes great!\nAs christians Jesus is telling us to be like salt - to get into the world, change the flavour, and ENHANCE it!\nThere is no real correlation between any Jewish custom and salt - what i think Jesus was getting at was this:\n1. salt enhances the flavour of a meal\n2. spread out! hear me out on this one. We agree that salt makes food taste better right? but only when its spread right throughout the meal! imagine me and my hot chips again but with all the salt intended for a large chips all over ONE CHIP! disgusting and too much right?! So Jesus is telling us to get out there in the midst of everyone that isn't 'salty' - and to not just get introspective in our christianity - its a lifestyle that is proactive and outward focussed!\n\nJesus then takes it a step further - He even goes to the extent of saying that if you dont stay salty you'll LOSE your saltiness. \nTo understand it don't look excessively deep into this one - here's the key - if salt doesn't taste like salt whats the point of putting it into anything? its lost the whole point of being salt! \nie if christians stop doing the stuff that enhances and affects humanity (preaching the gospel, bringing healing and restoration, bringing God's presence into circumstances, making life unforgettable for our non christian friends etc) whats the point of them being christian?\nHeres the facts of what Jesus was saying - Christian is as christian does - otherwise whats the point?!\nHave a great day!
1007785
Well, if it ties into your other question about what if the anti-Christ is a female then I would say chocolate.
1010417
Usually chocolate but every once in a while I'll go for strawberry. But never vanilla.
946579
Chocolate, Vanilla, Strawberry Milkshake.\nHoney.\nCaramel.\n\nOh my...I feel frisky thinkin' about it!
824799
Communion is the New Testament equivalent of the passover. During the passover celebration the Israelites were looking back to their deliverance from bondage in Egypt and forward to the Messiah, the lamb of God. Today we celebrate communion looking back at Jesus' sacrifice for us when we were delivered from bondage to death and sin and forward to His coming at the end of this age when the Kingdom of God will be established here on earth.\n\n"For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, "This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me." In the same way also he took the cup, after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me." For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes.  1 Corinthians 11:23-26 \n\nThe bread and the cup are spiritual symbols of Jesus' broken body and shed blood. The notion that anyone ever did or ever does actually eat the flesh or drink the blood of Jesus is totally false. Those people who have been brought up in a religious tradition that promotes this false doctrine like to quote Jesus in this passage.\n\nJohn 6:53 So Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. 54 Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. 55 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. 56 Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.\n\nWhen you isolate that text from the rest of what Jesus had to say it seems to say that Jesus is talking about actually engaging in what amounts to cannibalism. But when you look at the whole context of that speech you see that Jesus was speaking of the spiritual truth that when a person believes on his atoning sacrifice that they will receive the gift of eternal life.\n\nJohn 6:60 When many of his disciples heard it, they said, "This is a hard saying; who can listen to it?" 61 But Jesus, knowing in himself that his disciples were grumbling about this, said to them, "Do you take offense at this? 62 Then what if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before? 63 It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh is of no avail. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life.\n\nGet it? The flesh doesn't do anything, Jesus was talking about spiritual realities. It is like when Jesus made this statement a little further on.\n\nJohn 7:38 Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, 'Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.'" \n\nIf you isolate that text it looks like people would have a river flowing out of their chest or something. But the author goes on to explain, since Jesus apparently didn't in this case...\n\n39 Now this he said about the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were to receive, for as yet the Spirit had not been given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.
578300
Is this Jesus now or Jesus when he was in a human body.I think Jesus could handle his liquor better.(this is pure speculation at my part)You always heard of Jesus drinking wine in the bible and I never heard of moses drinking wine  (I claim to be no bible scholar, thus I could be wrong. There is too much violence in the bible and the characters are painfully one dimensional for me to get into the book) Nevertheless, at the end of Jesus's career he drank lots of wine and ate lots of fish.Fish having a better amino acid profile than desert weeds which was accessible to Moses.Thus, Jesus was younger and more buff than Moses( and being the son of god can't be a negative)----Jesus wins,  a fair bet in Vegas 5:1
1022247
I'm a Christian to and I like beer and mixed drinks.  That in itself is not a sin.  The abuse of it, however, is.  \n\nEven Jesus drank wine.  At the wedding where he performed his first miracle of making wine from water (if it were a sin he would not have contributed to it) and at the last supper he drank it and had his disciples drink it (he wouldn't have caused them to sin).\n\nSo yes, it is okay.  Just be in control and moderate!
1026351
How 'bout this choice:\n\nThere's a God.\n\nHe loves you.\n\nHe doesn't love/like what you do.\n\nHe wants you to change your ways.\n\nHe gave you Jesus. you can accept his forgiveness.\n\nWe're all sinners, but we're all children of God. We can still say sorry and do what is right.
1008557
Jesus freed us from the old Jewish dietary laws.  He specifically said, "It's not what comes into a man's mouth that makes him unclean, but what comes out."\n\nAnd in the book of Acts, God says, "Do not call unclean what the Lord has made clean."
1186377
So, that guy will kick the crap out of the loin cloth dude, but not a guy wearing a robe saying he is Jesus? Well, good thing he's got it all figured out.\n\nGive the guy some clothes and ask him if he is hungry. Jesus is no different than you or I. We are all exactly the same spirit and seen exactly the same as Jesus in God's eyes. If you treat Jesus better than you treat your fellow man then you are a hypocrite.
202922
Well yes God has emotions like all of us. Jesus laughed and was really humorous in his teachings.\nIt would not surprise me in the least if when i got to heaven Jesus was drinking a beer just hanging out and telling jokes!\n\nP.S. people try to say that wine in ancient times wasn't alchol but more like grape juice. this is wrong. wine in ancient times was alchol and very strong.  It is not a sin to drink alchol but it is to get drunk.\nold wine was contaminated wine. new wine was not. this is why they never mixed it!
710548
He is the reverend McDonald, you can find him at the church of McDonalds, where people pray to the calorie gods as they sip their triple-thick milkshakes.
1144138
dunno but i ate a antelope burger once....yummy
425923
Well bread and gravy were on the menu:\n\nLink 1:\n"Do you know why we break the bread? In the passover feast it was broken to remind the Jews that slaves never had the luxury of a complete loaf. Slave always, which they were in Egypt, had to eat bits and pieces. Today the bread is broken to remind us that Jesus Christ's body was broken on the cross. That's why we eat this. We remember what happened to Him. He died of a broken heart.\n\nNow, at the last supper they had a very small menu. And I don't think butter was on the menu. I don't like eating dry bread, do you? I'm glad that the Bible says that bread and our water will be sure. I almost wish it says that the peanut butter would be sure. He didn't use butter, so what did they do for this dry bread? They dipped it. They dipped it in a sauce. It's still the custom in the Middle East to do this. The sauce is often made of stewed fruit or bitter herbs, or a combination. They would dip the bread, and that's why in another passage of the Bible it's called the sop (see John 13:26 cf.). They sopped up that moisture and ate the bread. For each person to dip out of the same saucer was very meaningful. What it basically meant is that you and I, all of us that is doing this, are saying by doing this tat we are in unity. We're old friends. We're going to share each other's germs here. We're going to share everything. We would die to protect each other. WE are a bonded unit. We're going to be loyal to each other until death. \n\n\nLink 2:\nOn the Last Supper Menu: Was It Leavened or Unleavened Bread?\n\nDid Jesus and his disciples eat leavened or unleavened bread at the Last Supper?\n\n    by Michael P. Germano\n\nThe Argument\n\n    * The Greek word for "leaven" is zume\n    * The Greek for what we read as "unleavened bread" is azumos which is translated more properly as "unleavened" with out the word "bread."\n    * When an author wishes to be specific about the type of "bread" in any incident, he uses azumos. That is, the emphasis is on "unleavened", and not on bread, e.g., I Corinthians 5:8.\n    * The "bread" used at the Last Supper is the more generic Greek artos Hebrew lechem. In fact, Psalm 41:9 which describes a normal meal is used as a prophecy of this supper.\n    * The conclusion drawn from these scriptures is that the last Supper was just that, a normal meal served with leavened bread.\n\nSome churches use leavened bread for communion others employ unleavened bread. Does it make any difference? The answer to that question takes one to denominational doctrine. If you examine the arguments for and against either practice you will find that the dispute generally comes down to whether or not Jesus of Nazareth broke leavened or unleavened bread at the last Supper. As he then commanded his disciples to continue the practice as an important theological metaphor churches seek to follow the example he set. The scholarly literature shows that specialists are of a split opinion. Some believe the last Supper was a Passover Seder with unleavened bread others do not.\n\nArtos is the Greek word for bread. In Greek azumos refers specifically to unleavened bread. Zume is leaven. Can artos be either leavened or unleavened bread? At the occasion of the Last Supper Jesus took artos and "broke it and gave it to them" (Luke 22:19). He then passed it out to his disciples and they ate it. He took some artos, a morsel or piece, which he dipped and gave to Judas (John 13:21-26).\n\nWilliam Dankenbring points out that the Greek word for the bread consumed at the Last Supper was artos. He argues:\n\n    ...that evening we read that Jesus broke "bread" - artos in the Greek language - and they ate of it (Luke 22:19); He took a piece of this bread, and "dipped it," and gave it to Judas, who was to betray Him (John 13:21-26). The word artos is th
791670
strawberry!!!\nis that what we are having for lunch, again?