NOW THAT WE KNOW THAT BUSH IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR OUTING A ClA AGENT WILL HE BE IMPEACHED SOON?
401547
Not soon enough.\n\nActually I may be wrong about that. Can you say "President Cheney" without choking? Me either.\n\nOkay, let's say we impeach them both, and both are removed. Hey, a man can dream, can't he? Whups! Can you say "President Hastert"? BAD DREAM! BAD, BAD, BAD DREAM!!\n\nI think I would rather wait until after the mid-term elections, nail them both, and then say "President Pelosi." Heck, maybe she will even pick Hillary as VEEP.\n\n\n____________________________________________________\nA LITTLE ASIDE to Annoying up above: What part of the phrase "Scooter squealed like a pig" makes you think that the questioner thinks Scooter is "now a paragon of virtue and truth"? Actually I think it is pretty obvious to all but the kool-aid drinkers that Scooter is a scared little boy caught with his hand in the cookie jar who has just run out of lies.\n\nI think he needs to spend a long, long time in time-out.\n\n\n____________________________________________________\nA LITTLE ASIDE to Brian down below:\n\nAsking questions about our so-called leaders does not weaken America, not even indirectly. Sunshine is the best disinfectant.\n\nHowever, TREASONOUSLY OUTING UNDERCOVER OPERATIVES WHO ARE TRYING TO FIGHT THE SPREAD OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS **DIRECTLY** weakens America.\n\nAs for those responsible, "Hangin's too good fer 'em."
872932
No, just because it is not logistically sound. Only the U.S. House can impeach a President, and there are enough votes there for it. But that does not remove him from office. He would then stand trial in the Senate, where a 2/3 majority vote would be needed to remove Bush from office. There are not enough votes in the Senate for that. Therefore, it would just be a waste of time for the Congress, and a waste of taxpayer money.
25181
Unfortunately, since both houses of the legislature are controlled by Republicans, the liklihood of President Bush being impeached is virtually nil.\n\nIn order for him to be impeached, the House of Representatives would need to file articles of impeachment, which are passed by a simple majority. In order for this to occur, some Republican representatives would have to cross the aisle and vote with the Democratic minority. In the remote chance that this would happen, the case would be forwarded to the Senate for trial.\n\nOnce in the Senate, two thirds of the present Senators would be required. Once again, since the Republicans control this part of the House, the liklihood of an actual impeachment occuring is remote at best.\n\nAnd on another note, punishment is determined by the Senate. They can choose to remove him from office, or do nothing should he be impeached. Again, the odds of anything happening are slim and none.\n\nWhile it's nice to dream, we're going to have to wait for President Bush to leave office in eary 2009, unless the political landscape shifts drastically between now and then.\n\nRead the Wiki below for more info.
972407
Unfortunately until Congress reconvenes in January ,at least another month of Hell,my guess is ,is that Bush will do something before then to force impeachment proceedings.
666396
Hardly breaking news. We need to vote the rascals out in Nov. 2006. This will put pressure on President Bush, and it will bring up the possibility of impeachment.
892494
i hope so. but democrats don't want to impeach bush. they want to push him in the right direction for a change, though.
924263
No, I believe Nancy Pelosi, who has said they will not be seeking impeachment.  She expressed there is too much to accomplish to let the Congress get snarled up in impeachment proceedings.  I think she's right.  I'd like to see him impeached, I think he richly deserves it.  But, I'll respect the Democrats more for turning their full attention to the war, the economy and our safety in this country than for seeking revenge.  On a side note, Bush already invited Pelosi to lunch, I couldn't believe the fit of giggles that gave me lol.
1049807
Bush will not be impeached. He will resign in disgrace next spring, like Nixon did in 1974.
361320
I don't think it will be the end quite yet. With Republican control, there will have to be unrefutable evidence of the "name your issue" that has crossed the Bush Administration's path to get them to actually do something about it. There is mounting evidence against him in several areas, but not black and white outstanding evidence; at least not good enough for them as of yet. It is only a matter of time, but if the Democrats wrestle control in November, the risk of this happening will increase; however, they will have to be careful and do that only with credence, or they will be accused of just wanting to get back at Bush. When that day happens, I will be ecstatic.
448010
Micheal Moore is a true Patriot, he should be awarded the Freedom medal in Philly on July 4th. for his courageous and informative reports. Bush hasn't been impeached YET as the republicans are currently calling the shots in D.C.  That is about to end soon as the midterm elections are approaching. The criminal republicans day of reckoning is fast approaching, enjoy it while you can repugs. Bush and his goons should be on trial for their crimes against humanity.
967704
I keep hoping that the American people with get fed up with Bush and his cronies and charge them with impeachable offenses.  Might just happen after tomorrow.
607358
Yes it is time for Bush to step down, unfortunately our system does not work that way, but people have lost confidence in his ability to lead. His popularity has dropped to 29%. We will have an election in November that could change things. If the democrats can get a majority in either chamber then there is a possibility that he will be impeached. His leadership will certainly be challenged at best.
948135
The reason President Bush has not been impeached is that he has not committed an impeachable offense. The liberals’ constant rant that he lied is in fact a lie. He acted on the same information that congress did when they authorized the war in Iraq. He did not lie under oath as Clinton did. In fact, his biggest fault is that he has been brutally honest and the liberals don’t agree with what he has to say. That doesn’t make it a lie. I wish the liberals would come up with a meaningful rant, but I don’t think they’re capable of it.
255892
We are all sorry, but G.W. Bush has not lost his authority.\n\nHe is celebrating the fact that he WAS NOT elected President either time, and he still hasn't got impeached yet.\n \nHe will not his authority until Kenneth Starr or whoever has his job now gets him impeached,\nthere’s still time.\n\nIf they held him to the same standard as past Presidents,\nthey would have done it already.\n\nI mean Clinton only had sex.\n\nBush has committed many impeachable acts.\nSuch as starting a war without the UN.
545042
no... but this is in Bush's future\nArticles of Impeachment\n\nof\n\nPresident George W. Bush\n\nand\n\nVice President Richard B. Cheney,\nSecretary of State Condoleezza Rice,\nSecretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and\nAttorney General Alberto Gonzales\n\nThe President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. - - ARTICLE II, SECTION 4 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA\n\nPresident George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales have committed violations and subversions of the Constitution of the United States of America in an attempt to carry out with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes and deprivations of the civil rights of the people of the United States and other nations, by assuming powers of an imperial executive unaccountable to law and usurping powers of the Congress, the Judiciary and those reserved to the people of the United States, by the following acts:\n\n1) Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the  rule of law; carrying out a massive assault on and occupation of Iraq, a country that was not threatening the United States, resulting in the death and maiming of over one hundred thousand Iraqis, and thousands of U.S. G.I.s.\n\n2) Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.\n\n3) Authorizing, ordering and condoning direct attacks on civilians, civilian facilities and locations where civilian casualties were unavoidable. \n\n4) Instituting a secret and illegal wiretapping and spying operation against the people of the United States through the National Security Agency.\n\n5) Threatening the independence and sovereignty of Iraq by belligerently changing its government by force and assaulting Iraq in a war of aggression.\n\n6) Authorizing, ordering and condoning assassinations, summary executions, kidnappings, secret and other illegal detentions of individuals, torture and physical and psychological coercion of prisoners to obtain false statements concerning acts and intentions of governments and individuals and violating within the United States, and by authorizing U.S. forces and agents elsewhere, the rights of individuals under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.\n\n7) Making, ordering and condoning false statements and propaganda about the conduct of foreign governments and individuals and acts by U.S. government personnel; manipulating the media and foreign governments with false information; concealing information vital to public discussion and informed judgment concerning acts, intentions and possession, or efforts to obtain weapons of mass destruction in order to falsely create a climate of fear and destroy opposition to U.S. wars of aggression and first strike attacks.\n\n8) Violations and subversions of the Charter of the United Nations and international law, both a part of the "Supreme Law of the land" under Article VI, paragraph 2, of the Constitution, in an attempt to commit with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes in wars and threats of aggression against Afghanistan, Iraq and others and usurping powers of the United Nations and the peoples of its nations by bribery, coercion and other corrupt acts and by rejecting treaties, committing treaty violations, and frustrating compliance with treaties in order to destroy any means by which international law and institutions can prevent, affect, or adjudicate the exercise of U.S. military and economic power against the international com
1082482
Yes...the impeachment process is a safeguard.  The president must explain the reasoning for our war in Iraq.  \n\nHe has never explained it.  \n\nFirst it was the WMD's then the war on Terror, then fill in the blank.  \n\nHe works for us, and if he doesn't do his job...he should be fired.
507493
I really think that George Bush should go through an investigation. Impeachment could be the outcome of the investigation, yes.