If all humans are the same,is there any logic for creating different countries and nationalities?
397933
It is true we are all nearly identical genetically.  This is why culture plays such a defining role in our behavior both individually and as part of a larger group.\n\nThis is, for example, why I don't want to be part of a democratic system where religious fundamentalist are the clear majority.  I enjoy the ability to worship as I see fit without the threat of being stoned in public.\n\nIs this the answer you sought?\n\n-Armus
127182
Good question.  I think you may be on to something.  Our ancestors went from small clans roaming from cave/tree to cave/tree.  Then grew from towns and cities to states and countries in just several hundred years.  So as beliefs between people become more assimilated we may see a further melding of the worlds population into larger and larger countries.  Might take hundreds of years?
136346
Probably not. Certainly today they all have distict national identities and would likely not want to be merged like that.
146871
I think we need to be able to differenciate between individuals and countries.
337662
exactly like what Julius Ceasar, Napoleon, and Hitler wanted...this isn't to say that it might not work and make the majority of people happy given a compassionate and good leader.  However, the world is too big, and some militant extremist group would start some crap.  It's not quite possible.\n\nHowever, I've read science fiction novels about the world being run by corporations in the future.  This is a very interesting idea, and seems more probable than everyone being considered one country.
828227
same amount of nations in the world and 7 continents
272544
No. The idea of a one world government is a great idea in theory, but would only work if we had a perfect leader.  That is not going to happen.\n\nWhile it is true that different countries clash with one another, they also hold each other accountable.  If one country is treating its citizens poorly than other countries can place economic sanctions on that country until the problem is corrected, plead with the leadership to change thier policies, or when necessary remove the leaders of that country from power.  If we had a one world government, it would take a revolution in order to correct a leaders human rights violations.  No one person or one group should have the power to control the lives of the people of the world.
1092784
First of all, I only know of one world. Where are the other two? If there were three I would make everyone  start off equal. No one will be better than anyone else. Every race, creed, religion, would be the same. Everyone would get free medical, dental, a home etc. Then it would be up to the person to make their life better or worse. Thanks for the Q hun.
178193
Evrything is individual, and we are all different persons, with different beliefs, personal values, emotions, and genetics. Don't expect people to be similar to each other. Accept differences.
1187292
Anything that results in formal seggregation of the two populations will likely solve the problem.  But only if that seperation is backed up by force.
43032
Because that would be costly, chaotic and just one big problem!  There are too many religions, cultures, etc...If all of these people were forced to live in one country, war would be inevitable and a lot of lives would be lost.  As long as people are different, there can not be world peace.  Sad, but true.
217531
Probably not,  We would need one language, one culture and total political agreement.  There has not been peace for thousands of years, I doubt if we start anytime soon.
816846
yes, every person is unique genetically, we are all different and the same, at the same time.
943701
The same reason why in every country you go to you will find the same type of people but all have different beliefs. That is what freewill is about. What difference does it make anyway.
418411
If all humans started in Africa a very long time ago, they did not all stay there.  They wandered.  And as they wandered, tribal groups formed which were isolated one from another.  The characteristics of a given tribe were selected out in response to different environments.  Thus, for example, northern Europeans store fat on their bodies efficiently (way too efficiently for modern times!) to protect them from the cold winters.  The closer to the equator a tribe is, the darker skin is more valuable, and selection brings it to the forefront.  \n\nSo that's how we separated.  Now, with world wide transportation, we are coming together once more.  And as people from different gene pools breed, they produce the healthy children who have fewer matching of recessive traits.  Recessive traits are more likely to be the ones that cause problems.  So yes, it is better for us to mix, for the evolution of the species as a whole, and for the beauty and good health of the individual children thus created.
862906
I don't think everyone in the world would fit in the same place at the same time...
63127
There's a reason that no one nation rules the whole world. Is this a serious question?