need opinion about site?
412024
Ok - these are just impressions.\n\nIntro:\nI found the scrolling title distracting. Everything else looks pretty clean.  If you're going to have any motion, I would put it with the brain graphic more than likely.\nA little hesitation when I went to go to next page - it's not exactly clear.  Continue should be under the main text -think "website for a real dummy" always - simple is best.\n\nNext event button doesn't work. So I clicked "Members," unsure of what that might be.  You might relabel it project staff or something similar so it doesn't look like it was a default tag, but that's probably a nitpicky point. \n\nMembers page:\nCrop the photo at the bottom - date stamps are not cool. Just bring it in tight around the group's shoulders. This text, "Dr: Yasser M. Kadah" needs help.  You'd be better off changing it to something like "Supervisor: Dr. Yasser M. Kadah" or at least putting a full stop (period) instead of a colon.  Lose the scrolling text again - everything else pretty clean, get photos of other project staff if you can but I completely understand having to put placeholders.\n\nProject Steps:\n\nOk, again the scrolling text needs to go.  Otherwise, get an English or Journalism person to go through the text - you've got some awkward syntax. The under construction pages - even when a page is under construction, be sure to link back to the source page just for visitor convenience.  You need to either open a pop-up for pages not on your site, or warn that the link goes to an external site.\n\nSchedule:\n\nUmm, not sure about this page - is there a reason for it?\n\nDownloads:\nAgain, a good proofreading - "useful" has only one L in it.  The scrolling bar is beginning to drive me insane.\n\nContact us:\n\nPretty clean, except instead of "Eng : Mohamed Sami" I would either spell out the word or use a full stop (period) rather than a colon.\n\n\nOverall, you've got a pretty clean design, since I was able to just nitpick it.  Other than a couple of places where navigation is unclear, just please, please, be rid of the scrolling "Brain Computer Interface."  The problem is that it is the only moving item in the entire website, so your eye tends to be drawn to it.  You'd probably be better off running an entirely static design.\n\n\nOh yeah - I'm running on a broadband hookup, newest version of IE.  Look at mine as the layman (read: most users!) version of a rundown.  Most site viewers are neither going to know nor care what code is in the site, so long as it works and looks good.  Do feed in the META tags as mentioned above, though, you will need them for the search engines to pick up on.
408186
Yes if you have a good plan that can make the site standout from the scores of others we have. \n\nEmail me and we can perhaps chat abt it.
780652
I had never heard of it so took a look after seeing your question.\nIt looks to be quite good, and there is a reference to ebay on it (Obviously trying to steal some ebay customers).\n\nSo at first glance - yep - it looks good and I will be taking a better look at what they have on sale there. Of course, until you can find someone who has actually bought something, then you will not know for sure, but I might just buy a small item, just to test them out.\n\nI'll post a question if and when I have a go, to let you (And anyone else) know.\n\nHows that? Sorry I did not actually answer your question, but at least I took a look at the site.\n\n:-)
706811
I think it's great.  Loads quickly, not too busy, and not crowded with too much information.  SOmewebsites with too many things going slow down its loading and yours is great.  Although I am not a web builder, I've done it, but am not an expert.  You may get more criticism from the more experienced like yourself.
973283
its a good looking site!\ni was in the same boat as you a few weeks back. i was so annoyed at the cost of advertising i decided to run my own classifieds website. the address is http://onequidadverts.com and is for both usa and uk users registration is free but advertising is a hell of a lot cheaper than most popular sites.\nmines a fairly new site but has been submitted to google and such like and my site traffic is moving at a steady pace so far.\nits worth a look and im submitting to more and more sites everyday so 100's of people a day will see your classified ads too.\nthere is an internet section you can advertise in for just $2 ( which is about £1.20 odd) for 7 days there are other price plans too.\ngoodluck mate
94942
Make a few things a little more bright, ie. the graphics across the top. Make your titles stand out a bit more, dark brown on black will not grab any attention. Put your login near the top of the page to make it easier to sign in. Oh, and I would ditch te "Time Now Is" thing, it needs to have a time zone if you keep it. Also, the "Topics" and "Posts" headings are considered useless information. If you post news that sparks discussions, you could really improve this site. Finally, under the "Last Post" header, don't list the times, but a useful piece of the post itself. (Keep the "No Posts" messages)
1042700
Daryl :), I give it 9.\n\nI think the site is well balanced and well structured. It downloads at an acceptable speed on a busy 56k connection.\n\nOverall I would have given it a 10 if it were not for two things.\nYou loose 0.5 for the featured pet. It is dark text on a dark background. On a slightly dark monitor the text is unreadable. change  the text to a lighter colour if you can. I think maybe that part is being serverd by a different website, so changing it may be difficult. Okay i see it looks better in IE but the links are still slightly blured because it's blue on a blue background. The problem with the other dark text is most likely to do with the way FIREFOX interprets your style sheets. IN my experience firfoex does a good job with style sheets i write bu then they don't work prperly in IE. it's very irritationg for me because i am new to style sheets.\n\nThe other 0.5 point you loose for the reservation page. Using firefox i get an error saying my "the current browser is either too old or too modern (usind DOM document structure)" and then a date picker is way off at the bottem of the page. I would have taken 1 point but i see it works in IE6 which is means it will display correctly on more than 80% of the worlds computers.\n\n I also like the fact that it's not rotten with images. The colour scheme is very consistent and doesn't change from page to page. There are no popups or flash content which i also like about it. \n\nThe last but no least you have provided alternate contact details not just a webform. People who don't like to uise the web forms can contact you by phone or email.\n\nWorthy of mention is that all the links worked, there is no iritating background sound or moving text or flashy banners. Navigation is also a breeze, not confusing like some other pages.
206994
I haven't tried this one but it looks interesting:\nhttp://www.sitesell.com/
202879
Here are some free resorces (easy) polls for your website\nhttp://freepolls.com/\nhttp://www.pollhost.com/\nhttp://www.snappoll.com/\nhttp://www.1stsitefree.com/poll.htm (links directory)\nhttp://www.freecenter.com/yourpolls/\n Enjoy and good luck.
284949
I'd take his advice. SOunds pretty good. Did you try the help links at all?
784103
Hey I am just starting to work with web design but people tell me that I'm really good\na website i just designed: http://paramusrunning.bravehost.com\n\nSince I'm new at this i wouldn't charge a lot.\nContact me if you want to know more about my services.
31259
Check out this great website
537991
I have heard good things about this site and polls it creates.\n\nhttp://www.dpolls.com/
1081240
Check these sites for reviews
1184950
u may get a brief review on shvoong.com
1044819
NOt worring about the name\nI give it 9 like i did the previous two times you posted the question.\n\nI think the site is well balanced and well structured. It downloads at an acceptable speed on a busy 56k connection.\n\nOverall I would have given it a 10 if it were not for two things.\nYou loose 0.5 for the featured pet. It is dark text on a dark background. On a slightly dark monitor the text is unreadable. change the text to a lighter colour if you can. I think maybe that part is being serverd by a different website, so changing it may be difficult. Okay i see it looks better in IE but the links are still slightly blured because it's blue on a blue background. The problem with the other dark text is most likely to do with the way FIREFOX interprets your style sheets. IN my experience firfoex does a good job with style sheets i write bu then they don't work prperly in IE. it's very irritationg for me because i am new to style sheets.\n\nThe other 0.5 point you loose for the reservation page. Using firefox i get an error saying my "the current browser is either too old or too modern (usind DOM document structure)" and then a date picker is way off at the bottem of the page. I would have taken 1 point but i see it works in IE6 which is means it will display correctly on more than 80% of the worlds computers.\n\nI also like the fact that it's not rotten with images. The colour scheme is very consistent and doesn't change from page to page. There are no popups or flash content which i also like about it.\n\nThe last but no least you have provided alternate contact details not just a webform. People who don't like to uise the web forms can contact you by phone or email.\n\nWorthy of mention is that all the links worked, there is no iritating background sound or moving text or flashy banners. Navigation is also a breeze, not confusing like some other pages.\n\nOh yes in the menu part, little strips are displayed in FIREFOX instead of 1 long one like in IE
472609
The site that you gave was a good site.  I dont know about best.  That depends on what you are looking for and if they have it.  Here are some other links on the subject for you to browse and see if they are what you are looking for and if they are better than the site that you have.  Happy Huntings!