What is mental space? oh, and canyon, thnx 4 d help...?
400337
The Mental space is a theoretic construct proposed by Gilles Fauconnier corresponding to possible worlds in Philosophy. The main difference between a mental space and a possible world is that a mental space does not contain a faithful representation of reality, but an idealized cognitive model.
1009023
The universe that we live in has only three spatial dimensions. We are limited to length, width, and height, and we can only travel along three perpendicular paths. This page attempts to explain the properties of a hypothetical universe with a spatial fourth dimension. While people generally call time the 4th dimension in the universe we live in, time will be the 5th dimension in my hypothetical universe. \n\nMany fascinating possibilities exist when a spatial fourth dimension is present. Several types of wheels are possible, very complex machines can be built, and many more shapes are possible. Objects can pass by each other more easily, but they are harder to break into multiple pieces. Energy reduces much faster with distance than in the 3rd dimension, so both light and sound are weaker. Much more things can be compacted into a small space, but its much easier to get lost. In this page, I will explore these and many other interesting properties of the fourth dimension.
51104
http://www.peterussell.com/mindmaps/mindmap.html\n\nGo to the bottom of that link.  MIND MAP SOFTWARE
1089277
http://bci2.k-space.org/\n\nIt is Much easier to read
768599
Hi. Try this link for info on the holographic storage of a mind. : http://twm.co.nz/pribram.htm and here : http://www.acsa2000.net/bcngroup/jponkp/
347450
is the 4th quadrant "what u dont know  and what others dont know about u?" or what u call the area of potential...?
734740
Hey there,\n\nWhy cann't you check this website for your information...\n\nspaces.msn.com/creativity-n-experience
910873
The fourth dimension is referred to as time because of 3d charting.\n\nSay you have a 3d chart of two airplanes traveling through the sky, and they both cross through the point x,y,z. That is a measure of depth, height and width on a coordinate map.\nNow, that would mean that the planes crash at that point. But they don't necessarily crash because there is another dimension involved, time. The way real world events are charted involves length width height and time when. That means its XYZ time. that makes time the 4th dimension.\n\nIf you are talking about another direction being the 4th dimension, then when we discover how to move in that direction, time will be the 5th dimension.\n\nALSO: Look at the animation by clicking on the helix at the right side of this website, it should help you.\n\nHope that helps.
313307
The size of your brain :)
182640
I'm not sure if this is what you're asking, but if...\nd = length\nd-3 = width\n\nthen the area is d(d-3), a.k.a. d^2 - 3d .\n\nHope this helps!
1180449
There is a very easy plugin for quick time that allows you to put more pictures and have a panoramic view of an area. If you want virtual toors of large buildings that needs to be done in some *cad software and will cost you lots of money and time.
191182
I am not sure about life more than 4 dimensions. Why? Is this funny for you?
697314
Astral time travel maybe.Why do people always think you have to physically go somewhere?Most of it will become memories of past tense anyway right? Less is more.You could spend 8 hrs plugged into the Matrix and come out with  years worth of experiences and memories. Look into remote viewing.
35412
Surely 3D graphics may help developing the sense of the third dimension in geometric representations.\n\nNo comment about the negative effects on other sides of some kinds of games.
671694
9X9 is 4.don tel me u din kno dat.
207128
4th dimension is easy, since it's time.  Just imagine something moving in a 3d volume and you're imagining four dimensions, x,y,z and t.\n\nYou can imagine an object moving in five dimensions or more pretty easily, too.\n\nImagine two three dimensional volumes, one is x, y, z, the other is x, y, w.   Now imagine a point moving along a line in each volume, such that if the point is folowing some equation f(x,y,z,w,t) the x,y,z volume is tracking its coordinates in x,y,z and the x,y,w is tracking its coordiates over time in x,y,w.  You need to keep them coordinated in your head, which can be tricky, but if you get good at it you can also imagine rotating one or both 3d volume about any given axis and keep tracking the point.  So, you can rotate x,y,z into x,y,w, or z,y,w, or whatever, while still imagining the motion of the point.  And, there you are, imagining five dimensions simultaneously.   You can do this for any number of dimensions, keeping track of them via rotation of basis and/or multiple 3d volumes, but it gets a little tricky, sort of like keeping two or three songs running in your head at the same time, but with practice it can be done.   I can successfully keep track of up to eight dimensions this way with ease, any more than that takes serious concentration.  It can be trickier if using non-euclidian volumes, but in some cases, like the small curled dimensions used in string theory, it can actually be easier than dealing with many large dimensions.
359632
I'm guessing that you're asking what does it mean to say something is 2.5 dimensional, as opposed to 2 dimensional or 3 dimensional.  \n\nAnytime you have a fractional dimension like that, you're dealing with a fractal.  That's where the word "fractal" comes from.  The dimension for an object that is self-similar at many size scales in a complex way can be thought of as an extension of the obvious fact that a uniform object of unit length d in two dimensions has an area of d^2.  In three dimensions, a uniform object of unit  d (a cube with sides d units long) has a volume of d^3, and so on.  \n\nSo, you can generalize this concept and say that something has the dimensionality of whatever power the scale along one axis has to be raised to in order to give the area/volume/whatever.   Since a fractal object has repetition at all scales of some sort of complex pattern, the relationship between scale and total size, the dimensionality, is a non-integer.\n\nSo, for example, if you had a volume which had been "Swiss cheesed" by some sort of algorithmic removal of sub-volumes, and sub-volumes of the remaining volumes, and so on, and so on, to make a fractal sponge, it would have a dimensionality between 2 and 3.