Does anyone know where I could find a legal summary of the case The People V. Blaisdell from 1822?
402101
just type findlaw.com
616184
Your county law library -- the librarian can help you.  If you don't have a county law library, by some chance; call some law firms -- they often maintain libraries.\n\nIf you need help determining what book to look in, where -- e-mail me.  If I have time to look online, I will & will edit this or e-mail you.\n\n[EDIT]  I did a relatively quick search and found these:\n\nHustler Magazine v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988).  This case can be found (word for word) at:\nhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=485&invol=46\n\nIn it, you will find a lot of cases that were relied on to support this decision, so look for the cases cites.  (U.S. = Supreme Court cases; F. or F. Supp., = Federal (district) cases.) \n\nI forget exactly what's at this site.  I think it's another case, with case law cited also:  http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/Courses/tortsF01/IIEM.htm\n\nThere is general info at  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_infliction_of_emotional_distress  \n\nPut IIED (abbreviated and/or spelled out, in quotes) in the search box at www.findlaw.com -- you might find some cases.\n\nI'll let you know if I find anything else.\n\n[EDIT]  This site has to do with bullying in the workplace.  9th Circuit Court of Appeals.  \nhttp://writ.news.findlaw.com/grossman/20050920.html\n\n[EDIT]  If you find a U.S. Case you want to read, go to this page.  I believe you can pull up the case (word for word) by clicking on the appropriate link (on this page) and then the name/cite of the case.  \nhttp://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/casefinder.html\n\n\n\n[EDIT]  I found more for you.  Amongst websites (below) that you may be interested in, there are Cases cited.  The cases cited all have Federal cases (cited) within them, so look at the body of the decisions for more case law.  The case I've cited may not be (exactly) what you want, but cases within them may be.\n\nThe U.S. Legal Landscape: Evolving Towards Protecting Employees Against Bullying At Work; Possible Theories Of Employer Liability: How Employers Could Be On The Hook \nThe Hostile Working Environment Harassment Theory:  EEOC v. National Education Association Alaska, 422 F. 3d 840 (9th Cir. 2005) at\nhttp://www.lorman.com/seminars/teleconference.php?product_id=152654&topic=LB\n\n\nThis is an excellent site for info (perhaps).  The case I've cited below com from it: http://www.bullyinginstitute.org/studies.html\n\nTwo US Supreme Court summer 1998 decisions that made employers responsible ("vicarious liability") for harassment and discrimination by management who act as "agents" of employers:\n\n(1)  Burlington Industries vs. Ellerth,  123 F.3d 490 (1998), affirmed.  This decision fixes "vicarious liability" for illegal harassment on the employer. Supervisors are agents of the employer.    http://www.bullyinginstitute.org/bbstudies/ellerth.html \n\n(2)  Faragher vs. City of Boca Raton, 111 F. 3d 1530 (1998), reversed and remanded.  This decision assigns liability for illegal harassment to the employer whether or not the employer was aware of its occurrence.  http://www.bullyinginstitute.org/bbstudies/faragher.html\n\nAlso:  http://www.bullyinginstitute.org/bbstudies/eeocnea.html   This case illustrates an alternative motivational theory in which an abusive bully takes advantage of a traditionally female workplace because he is more comfortable when bullying women than when bullying men.   CHRISTOPHER v. NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.  [This may be the same case I cited above, or related to, 422 F. 3d 840 (9th Cir. 2005).  Read the entire Ruling (in .pdf format) -- a lot of federal cases cited.]
899469
Try http://www.law.upenn.edu/library/ulc/ulc.htm
369408
This is a great source... and if it's not in their database, they'll research it.\n\nGood luck
179417
Try the Department of Justice web site.
778284
go to :\nhttp://www.freelegalpapers.net
384875
I tried and tried to find a website that had the information for you, but had no success whatsoever.\n\nMaybe look through a local newspaper archive for the information?
648693
It depends on which court handled the case. If it is the U.S. Supreme Court, go to the website; http://www.supremecourtus.gov/ and click on the the docket link and enterin your search criteria. Good luck.
289705
Haven’t you at least read the case syllabus?\n\nIf not, read it and questions should come to mind.  \n\nYou can find it at the source link: .
210564
Sorry, not familiar with the case, but I do suggest Lexis Nexis at your college library
904812
Uh Lawyer Here--Do your own homework, start by reading the case, then look for comentary on it.  Also, you only got 2 days to do this?  Sounds like you left it to the last minute.  The case has to do with the remoteness of damages in contract and is related to the much earlier case of Hadley v. Baxendale.  \n\nA simple Google search has pulled up a scholarly article on this case--why is it that you couldn't do the same? Of course, I don't have access to the full article....
971952
If you could give a case citation, or at least the complete name of the case, the jurisdiction, and the approximate year of the decision, I can read it and give you some idea.  Unfortunately, you didn't give enough information to obtain help.
290509
Can you be more specific in what you are looking for?\n\nFor example are you looking for laws that are pertinent only to England?
987110
Well, the first step is to identify where it happened. Was it a state case or federal? What state / district? Was it appealed? Do you have a formal citation for the case? Or even a year?\n\nThere are many legal database out there (findlaw.com being one of the more useful). But if you don't know what jurisdiction the case was, it's going to be impossible to find.
866382
Try the links.\n\nSounds like the fines are substantial.\n\nGood luck.
419458
http://www.groklaw.net
205535
I think you'll find all the information you need at this link:\n\nhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=372&invol=335