If a valid conclusion does not follow, write no valid conclusion.?
413530
Your argument is of the form\n\n1) All As are Bs,\n2) If C is B, then...\n\nNo valid conclusion follows from this form.
590080
not prove - but offer a rationale. Same with statistics. Like Humpty Dumpty said i nWonderland " I pay the words, so they mean whatever I want them to mean."
455739
Something for which confirmation is not got.
177409
Nope... Nor will we run out of answers to give, either right or wrong.
164193
i suggest you should start any activity with fixing "out comes" not the "input".Unless you reach that outcomes you shoud not revise anything. if you use this principle of fixing outcomes you will never need to make any revision.
960442
These are not rules, just statements. As statements I do agree. God is, I am not He.\n\nAs for other replies, it is written: "Only a fool says there is no God." There has been a lot of fulfillment to that statement.
724331
walking contradiction
135341
You need to write your own conclusion, we were not there in the lab doing the experiment with you, we dont know your results or the goal of the lab.
972139
According to deductive conception nomologica of the scientific explanations, and possible to have deduction without explanation? No, if you arrive at a deduction then you have an explemation, even if it does not match what you thought your hypotosis would be.
924570
an exception.some thing not consistent with an assumed  theory/relationship-in maths, a point of failure of the equation
750509
Part 1: Nothing\nPart 2: I don't automatically believe everything that is written.\nPart 3: Agreed and  not only is it nonsense, it's not going to happen and the less-aware amongst us perpetuate the myth as they cannot face the reality of life and death without believing in false promises. They may not ever learn the truth, which is a great pity.
1109801
toss a coin and then see if the answer feels right --- if it doesnt than choose the other option \n\nmake a choice and move on
187437
Here's an example that I saw a lot in the last set of papers I graded (ugh):\n"Participating in this campaign is not my duty because I have no obligation to do so."\n\nThe conclusion, "Participating in this campaign is not my duty," is justified by the statement, "I have no obligation to do so."  However, the justification is just a restatement of the conclusion, so no real support for the conclusion has been given.  That is begging the question.
299656
im thinking what should i think to write an answer to your question on thinking so im thinking whther i should think and think or stop thinking so that thinking doesnot eat my head.if it does so maybe i can never think agaun and if u cant think again my thininkg power will go, so better nit to think and think of doing something reasonable.\nso maybe i need to think of what should i think now so tat i can answer your thinknin question
773183
If you disagree with a statement, you never feel that it is true.\n\nIf you tend to disagree, you would probably never feel that it is true, but you might make an exception in certain cases.\n\nFor example, take this statement:\nCheating on a spouse is okay.\n\nWhereas person #1 is happily married and might always disagree, person #2 may know a friend who was in an abusive relationship, and after cheating on her spouse, married the other man, who has treated her like a queen ever since.  Person #1 would mark disagree, and person #2 would mark "Tend to Disagree"
885857
Having the ring of truth or plausibility but actually fallacious: a specious argument.
337084
That, technically. has not been proven.