while ar there gay or lesbian, didn't God create women for men?
410681
They are decieved into what they are doing is right, Because other gay men brainwash them into joining them,\n\nSome(Not all) Gay men will try to brainwash stright men into joining there team by being super extra nice to them, and play with there emotions.\n\nThey are also decieved and brainwashed by soceity, peer presure, Pornogophy, infulcnes, tv, family, childhood, and mental illness that "may" be devolped from child molestation.
1058589
Because, while Judaism first claimed that their God was genderless, the original religion was influenced by hundreds of years of patriarchal societies that saw men as being the most important members of a civilization.  By the time Christianity and Islam came along as little branches off to the sides, the "he" was firmly in place, despite the supposed-"genderless" nature of the deity.  Unfortunately, now there are those who refuse to see it any other way.  I prefer my Wiccan Goddess and God that acknowledges the balance between female and male, the need of each for the other.
369829
There was once a star trek episode that explained specific points that dictate whether something is an organism or not and one was that you had to be able to reproduce.  Man and women can, in general, reproduce but woman and woman and man and man cannot?  Together it is impossible for them to reproduce (with the exeptions of hermaphrodites whose case is arguable)  I believe in God and he made man and woman to be together. It was such an ingenious plan that we are perfect puzzle pieces foreach other, but like the humans we are (carnal and unable to easily overcome our inadaquacies) choose to go the direct opposite of what God intended.  I'm sorry to the homosexual population if you are offended. I honestly am.  I do not hate you but I do not have to agree with you.  I have many friends that i love but do not agree with and some of those are homosexual.  Its just that if you did not understand your sexuality in the first place then why do you think you are for sure homosexual?  I do not believe it is a natural affection but purely choice (which thank God we have) Choice.  You choose your feelings but I do not condemn you for that.  I dont condemn you at all but I condemn homosexuality.  Its not natural but you can do what you wish.  I just think that if you cannot naturally have children as a couple, let others who lost the opportunity but do have it naturally as a man and women, adopt.  Do you understand? I think I'm just being confusing. sorry.
1036444
I think you're answering your own question.  You say that, according to creationism, women were created in man's image, which would mean that man existed before woman, which in turn would mean that Adam already had nipples and therefore Eve was created with nipples (in his image), but with breasts to feed her babies.\n\nSo, logically, men have nipples because they descend from Adam, who was created with nipples.
167551
Because of homosexuality.  Due to homosexuality, a man could be considered feminine by wearing womens clothes and be called gay names, plus womens clothes don't look right on a man, or don't fit right, where a woman can wear most mens clothes and not look strange.
751453
God never changed his perspective on women, they have always been free agents.  Keep in mind the treatment of women start and end with what MEN and WOMEN do.  God never intended things like divorces but temporary provisions had to be made in the law.  Womens rights have only been granted on account of  recent human enlightenment.  Bear in mind also that women arent free in every country today!\n\nIf people had always lived by Biblical principles they would know and understand that all mankind (including women) are created equal in Gods eyes.  God got just as mad in the Bible when women sinned as he did when men sinned.  One could make a strong argument though that the reason for womens rights have come as a result of free nations that God created to begin with!
449700
seems to me, God made you, too....you didn't choose to be gay, so why would you be punished?
376380
IF GOD INTENED IT TO BE SO THAN THERE WOULDN'T BE WOMEN. MEN ARE JUST AS ROUDY AS WOMEN. INFACT I THINK THE WORLD IS MORE PEACFUL THAN IT WOULD BE WITHOUT THEM. THINK ABOUT IT, THEY ARE THE ONES THAT KEEP THE PEACE, BREAK FIGHTS WHEN MALE EGOS START INFLATING. THE WORLD NEEDS WOMEN.
785853
But they can! Just depends on what hetero man u ask! LOL this would mean that women who say the same thing ARE LESBIANS??? Then we wouldn't have any ladies left for us!
553616
May be a plan, not sure. I actually believe Adam & Eve were God's first man/woman creation. They lived in Eden. Then God created more people in other areas outside of Eden. So, the Sons most likely found other women outside the Garden. But, that what I think, many other ideas on this.\nDang it Mainworry again. :-p Not seen you in a while; God Bless!
1153962
Your "she" made me laugh. Indeed, the idea of God being a male is in everyone's mind, although we know he doesn't need to be any gender. \n\nYour question could be "Who programmed God?"\nI don't think at all that way, but respect your original question and smile.... ;-)
196145
I am a Christian.  However the bible was written by MAN not GOD.  I do not think God wants us to be slaves to our husbands, thats just what man wanted from women.
346781
Neither (yet, oddly, both).\n\nIn response to the argument that the Bible refers to God as "Him" and therefore God is Male -- In the French language, words describing objects are preceded by "le" or "la" which gives them value as being masculine or feminine terms -- that doesn't mean the objects are female or male.  In most languages, ships and nations (just two examples) are referred to as "She" and "her" -- that doesn't mean they are female.  In the past, in the US, to simplify statements, if the gender was not known or could be either, "he" was used.  (Example:  "To return an item, he must have his receipt.")  Our (US) Constitution uses the term "he", but in no way is meant to imply that it only refers to men.  And, man, as a species, includes women.\n\nGod (as great as He is) and the Lord (as great as He is) would not be so petty (I believe) as to bicker about the terms, He or She, to describe Them.  If the Lord was both male and female through the ages, the use of "He" to describe His position simplifies writing.  People (I believe) are equal in His eyes regardless of gender.  \n\nBesides, in Scriptures, in naming woman, we really don't know that "woman" doesn't mean "equal to the first one, but different-looking". \n\nPeace.
720892
God could care less about women. They are like cattle. Only good for breeding and milking. God loves man only. \nDon't waste my time with stupid questions. You obviously did not go to Muslim-Christian_jew-School or you would know already that women are just here to serve MAN !\nYou a virgin ? Bet not. Bad. Very, very bad for woman not to be virgin. Against god.
870384
Yes. Women are not considered the equals of men, but are told be subserviant and obediant and considered lesser creatures than men in the deity's eyes.\n\nRomans\n\nPaul says "the head of the woman is the man," meaning that the women are to be subordinate to men. 11:3 \n\nIf a woman refuses to cover her head in church, then her her head must be shaved. 11:5-6 \n\nMen are made in the image of God; women in the image of men. Women were created from and for men. 11:7-9 \n\nWomen are commanded by Paul to be silent in church and to be obedient to men. He further says that "if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in church." 14:34-35 \n\nEphesians\n\nWives must submit to their husbands "in every thing" as though they were Christ. "For the husband is the head of the wife." 5:22-24 \n\nWives must reverence their husband. 5:33 \n\nColossians\n\nWives, according to Paul, must submit themselves to their husbands. 3:18 \n\n1 Timothy\nWomen are to dress modestly, "with shamefacedness" -- "not with braided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array." 2:9 \n\n"Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence." 2:11-12 \n\nReal widows are "desolate" and pray "night and day." But those widows that experience pleasure are "dead while [they] live." 5:5-6 \n\nYou should help a widow only if she 1) is over 60 years old, 2) had only one husband, 3) has raised children, 4) has lodged strangers, 5) has "washed the saints feet," 6) has relieved the afflicted, and 7) has "diligently followed very good work." Otherwise, let them starve. "But the younger widows refuse [to help]: for ... they will marry; having damnation." Besides the young widows are always idle tattlers -- "busybodies, spreading things which they ought not." He adds that "some are already turned aside after Satan." 5:9-15
561498
No there doesn't always have to be a "masculine" and "feminine" member in every homosexual relationship. However I've seen it both ways.
517729
When the bible speaks about Men it also refers to women also so yeah lesbians are out of the question too