How many bombs United States will throw on Iran?
413712
none if they're smart. we already pissed off the rest of the world with iraq
322573
Bomb this bomb that, heck when are we gonna stop bombing
318311
yes he will have them, and yes he may misuse it by attacking other countries, and no the usa cant attack iran cuz if the us did it will turn the world to hell
43784
I doubt it.It wouldn't matter if the Iranian leader was the next Hitler.People in the US would still protest it,until it was too late and Iran developed a bomb that somehow wiped the US out.
243893
Israel or the United States.  Israel will bomb Iran because of the nuclear threat.  The U.S. will bomb Iran because it plans on dropping the U.S. dollar on March 20th and we can't afford that to happen...
571250
Well now.  A US battle battle group, which consist of aircraft carriers, destroyers, nuclear attack submarines, is capable singly of defeating any power on earth.  And the US has twelve battle groups. So at the very least Iran would be wiped out twelvefold.\n\nRemember how Saddam Hussein's "Mother of all Battles" turned out to be a total non-event.  Iran would simply cease to exist in a matter of days.\n\nAll your conceited, self-serving phony so-called religious rhetoric is useless drivvel.
48723
No one plan to Nuke the US specially Iranian, there are more Irani people in US than you can imagine, just go check your best universities like MIT or Stanford.\nThe only attack to US has done by Bin Laden and if you know he was created by CIA in order to prevent Afghanestan to have a government like Iran and Iranian supported Anti Taliban groups in Afghanestan all the time that US was supporting them, and Iran government yelled that he is a murderer, its not Iranian fault.\nUS don't like Iran to be a nuclear power, its a fact but you must search the reason elsewhere, its not hollywood movies, its politics.\nA nuclear Iran will ruin all power equations in Middle East. Even they can force US to leave the territory. That's the real reason.\nIran has threatened Israel to wipe out of the map for 30 years and nothing actually has happened and will not happen.\nThe main use of Nuke isn't military, its political, look at India and Pakistan, they declared they are both have nukes at the same time. they both have it but it was hidden, when one did a nuclear test the other one did it about a week. Can you get my point?\nAbout Iran and Israel there are many hidden facts that I'm not in the mood to repeat(if you really like to know them ask here or email me)\nAnyways don't worry, we will not nuke you, one who has to worry is me because once nice Americans  attacked an Iranian AirBus which was full of civilan travelers and I'm young and want to live long to see my grandchildren.
379646
So far only limited information is available, only from what was release to the press by the Iranian.\n\nJuLy 7, 2003, BBC news "Iran missile test alarms Israel" http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3051418.stm\n\nIran Missile Milestones - 1985-2000; http://www.wisconsinproject.org/countries/iran/miss-miles.htm\n\nAnalysis: Iran's Missile Capabilities; http://www.spacedaily.com/news/missiles-04zzl.html\n\nApril 08, 2006 Iran missile threat could harm US; http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060408/OPINION02/604080351/1009/OPINION\n\nCNN, April 05,  Iran says another 'top secret' missile tested; http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/04/05/iran.missile.ap/\n\nUpdate 2: Iran Test-Fires 'Top Secret' Missile ; http://www.forbes.com/business/businesstech/feeds/ap/2006/04/05/ap2649634.html\n\nAt this point, we may say that its nothing, but dont forget the fact that Iran fired a Silkworm missile (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silkworm_missile) in 1988 that hit US Tanker (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Earnest_Will)\n\nEven after that, Iran continue to develop and improve its missile technology, courtesy of teh Chinese.\n\nLast week missile test by the Iranian shows that the missile can deliver multi payload, it is also a well known fact that Iran despise the Jews.\n\nHow soon and how fast can Iran develop a cruise missile? its only a matter of time.
856738
I've been saying this for months. I've told EVERYBODY that after the elections, the U.S., Great Britain, and/or Israel WILL strike Iran.\n\nThink about it...  . . .We're not about to let them get NUCLEAR BOMBS.
1173021
The usa, they will blow themselves up to make it look likes someone else is getting them, probably iran next.
168352
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/nuke/\n\nThis is an estimate of the size of the nuclear program of Israel up to 2000; the text is in the Federation of  American Scientists site. The number in the graph shows something around 200 !\n\nMind you that the text cites that in the Yom Kipur war probably around 13-14 atomic bombs were build. Apparently, none of them were used, since the war was using only conventional weapons.\n\nWe all know that only two atomic bombs were used in history though, both of them in Japan by the american army.
512588
Right now we are heading to a war in Iran if Iran keeps up with WMD's.  A war on Civilisation is still verry unlikly the U.S. never had a war like that before.
329420
I know you're not serious, but here's a target assessment:\nMajor cities. Tehran, with a population of over 6 million, as well as Mashad with well over a million and Esfahan, Tabriz, and Shiraz, all of which are near one million, are the largest. Altogether there are over 30 cities with populations exceeding 100,000. But it is hard to envision any scenarios which would focus on urban destruction. Further, as soft targets, these cities could be devastated by relatively small nuclear weapons. There is no conceivable requirement for high-yield strategic weapons to attack Iranian urban targets.\n\nInfrastructure. A concentrated conventional attack on Iranian infrastructure (major bridges, rail yards, power generation and transmission facilities, telecommunications centers, industrial plants, and fuel depots) could certainly destroy the Iranian economy.  These are almost all soft targets susceptible to attack by conventional weapons. Only in extreme cases would any use of lower-yield nuclear weapons be at all attractive.\n\nCommand and control. Iran's key leaders are religious figures, so targeting the national leadership necessarily means targeting major religious centers. Such an action could only result in a firestorm of opposition throughout the Muslim world; this makes any specific targeting of the Iranian national leadership impractical. At a lower level, the Joint Staff of the Ministry of Defense, with its subordinate Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as well as an Operational Area Command and several field headquarters could certainly be targeted.\n\nSome of these may be in hardened locations, but the biggest targeting challenge would undoubtedly be identifying exact locations, especially in a time of crisis. Conceivably, attacks on some identified, hardened command centers could be carried out with nuclear weapons.\n\nThe contamination to nearby countries would prohibit the use of nuclear weapons, unless there were extreme circumstances.
1167061
Some strategist with the grand plan had to know this, so I'm not sure what the logic was in dismantling Iran's enemies before going after them.  Maybe the same logic at work that said toppling the sectarian dictator of Iraq who was keeping the religious fanatics from tearing each other apart was a good idea.  Or maybe the same logic that said starting 2 or 3 major wars in the Middle East would curb Islamic fundamentalism.\n\nAll I know is that our economy absolutely cannot mathematically sustain a 3rd war, and I estimate 6 to 8 months after the first bomb hits Iran for total "Great Depression" style economic collapse of the US.   This collapse was inevitable in 20 to 30 years before, but our government spending spree has accelerated this enormously, coupled with the "housing boom" that has seen $9 trillion more in home loans.  Over the next 30 years we, as American taxpayers and private citizens, will end up owing $54 to $100 trillion, and that is ONLY if we start doing balanced budgets NOW (it could get much, much worse).  Another war will absolutely break us.\n\nOnce it becomes more and more clear that we won't be able to pay this off, the dollar takes a nose-dive.
398746
About 27,000. About 13,000 of these are ready to use, the rest are in long-term storage.  Of the 27,000 total warheads, 26000 are in the US and Russia.
927671
My guess is about five years.  I'm planning to stay out of big cities as much as possible.  Iran is pursuing uranium enrichment technology; with high-quality U-235, it is almost trivially easy to build a nuclear bomb -- unlike plutonium technology, which the North Koreans tried, and which did not work very well.
640884
Hopefully never. Even though Iran's push for enriched uranium is totally wrong, for the US to go and attack another arabic nation would open up a whole new bag of worms. I think Bush and his mates should get over themselves. Violence solves nothing...just causes more pain for more people.