what year ranger rear axels fit 1990 ford mustang and what year lincoln mark 4 front rotor will innerchange?
409426
don't waste time and money on a weak ranger axel. search the internet and area junk yards for a used ford 9 inch rear end. ranger axles aren't very strong especially next to the 9 inch. the 9 inch was standard in older mustangs\nbut the spring perches are probably not the same. or find a 8.8 inch 5 bolt out of a newer mustang which should bolt right in. the 9 inch is the strongest 5 bolt rear end ever made which is the best choice for high horsepower.\nhowever they are hard to find used and are expensive new or rebuilt. the 8.8 inch is easy to come by and is also a better choice than a ranger rear end. if you can reply to \njordan_00_slipknot@yahoo.com with a little more info\nwhether the 1990 has leaf or coil springs how much power you\nplan on getting to the ground and type of driving you will be doing i can help narrow the options down for you.\nas far as the brakes i'm not sure but you might want to\nconsider after market rotors calipers and pads if you are\ngonna have a good amount power when you are all done.\nhope to get a reply from a fellow mustang fan. good luck!
527379
Check eBay motors. They have a section dedicated to parts.
443573
I haven't really kept up on the 06 lincolns, but I will say this, when that car was introduced, it set records. It was the first truly beautiful, state of the art, powerful, prestigous lincoln built. And I can't imagine it losing steam in 6 years. 0-60 in 6.4? I believe that's right close to the Infinity. The car speaks for itself. Park it somewhere and watch the reactions of poeple walking by. It screams luxury. It's the only car ford did NOT want to put a 4.6 in STRICTLY because they WANTED to be different and "more refined". If that constitutes a copycat car then it's a sad day for detroit. I'm not a lincoln guy, but that car demands respect and admiration like no other lincoln before it.
77052
Get a Mustang GT and a Paxton supercharger kit. You should be running 450-500 horsepower at the rear wheels with that setup.
904765
You can try\nhttp://www.ranger-retrocenter.com/index-old1.html
480626
no, it's not stupid.  and can be done.  you will need to change out the tranny though.  a good C6 will bolt up to your 302, and perform very well.  you will have to take your driveline to a reputable driveline shop and have it modified to fit the length of your new engine and tranny combo.  as for your differential, as long as you're not drag racing this thing it should handle the torque and horses nicely.  if what you want is to launch the truck and pull some nice quarter mile times, then yes replace the entire rear end with that of a full size truck, that would take a bit of modification to do.  i would use the ranger's original diff and just be sure that it is full of clean extreme duty gear lube.
286752
You don't say what's wrong w/ it, Ford truck man. try this specialized site.\n\nhttp://fordfzone.com/forums/index.php?showforum=11
992213
the specs are the same... but the compression isn't and the carburator is different, as well the intake housing.  So take to you local maine repair shop... check the aprt numbers on the gasket for the intake... if they are the same, order the gasket.... see if you can buy a used intake and carb..... and hey... give it a shot.... but also be warned.... I wouldn't run her full throttle..... I believe the connecting rods are thicker in the 90.... as well as the cylinder walls being thicker.
205756
The best thing to do is get a Chilton's book for that year and make. It will be able to show you everything. Good luck!!!
64044
Ford Mustang.  Been awhile since I've seen it so I'm not sure what year.  I believe it's a '67, but it's somewhere from '65-'68.\n\n(And it's "Spenser" -- like the poet.
688187
most likely the civic, but i could be wrong, go to http://google.com/ and type in 2004 Honda Civic V4 Specifications, and 1995 Ford Mustand V6 Specifications, and see the HP and everything, and go from there.
451436
Dollar for dollar, you will be better off selling the 1990 and using the money to purchase a newer Honda/Acura (if that is you preference).  Putting more HP/Torque in a 1990 takes much more work and money than you will anticipate.  That era of car was not designed for that.  The newer cars have structural strength in critical areas needed to handle the power, and the suspensions/drivetrain are designed for the power/torque.
355511
it is the same as an1989 corolla it will never change but if you really wanna know goto tireguys.com
126497
Try the manufacture web sight with the same info
92070
Try this \nhttp://www.jeepforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=231410\nwill continue researching for you\nthis work?\nhttp://www.jeepforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=39873
364808
Contact the Early Ford V8 Club.  They're the experts on flat-head V8 engines.
169783
you can make the turbo work off of a 1984 SVO Mustang.  Hard to get but it'll work.  Try ebay. Also, the guy's post below mine is crazy.  The 2.8 in the SVO can be easily tuned to run in the low 12's.