what is the solution for terrorism in the world?
404012
well, listen to this :)\n\nIf you want to bring peace to the country,\nbring peace to the regions first;\nIf you want to bring peace to the regions,\nbring peace to the cities first;\nIf you want to bring peace to the cities,\nbring peace to the families first;\nIf you want to bring peace to the families,\nbring peace to your own family first;\nIf you want to bring peace to your own family,\nbring peace to yourself first.\n\ntc, marifa5970 from Austria/Europe
400594
Islam is not the solution to anything.  I understand that not all Muslims are terrorists, but the vast majority of terrorists seem to be Muslim.  \n\nIslam is a religion of peace???  That's not how I see it.  I don't seem to recall a Swede blowing up anything in the name of Christianity.\n\nMuslims seem to have an inability to live peacefully with their non-Muslim neighbors.  The Israelis are quite happy to live next to a Palestinian state, but the Palestinians refuse to live next to the Israelis.\n\nIn India, the Hindus are constantly attacked by Muslims.  In East Timor, the Christian East Timorese never attacked the Islamic Indonesians, but the Islamic Indonesians tried to slaughter the East Timorese.  In Philippines Abu Sayyef engages in terrorism because the Philippines is a Christian nation.  There is ethnic cleaning in Darfur and Nigeria -- both initiated by Muslims.\n\nAs a Christian, the DaVince code is highly offensive to me, but I do not advocate bombing the publisher or killing the author (there is still a fatwa against Salman Rushdie by the way).  The Muslims don't like a cartoon in a Danish newspaper, so they riot all over the world.  Grow up!  That violence was orchestrated in order to cause trouble.\n\nThe November riots in Paris were orchestrated by the imams in the Paris mosques.  Based upon what I see, Islam is a religion of violence.  It is not the solution to anything.
1092819
I think we are unchartered waters on this one.  We have never fought an enemy of this nature before so where to draw the line and how far to take it will depend on the world's willingness to stop the terror attacks.  As we saw with Spain, not all countries view this war the same.  But, unless there is a concerted effort on the part of all governments that value freedom to destroy the terrorists throughout the world we will never end this.  Afghanistan and Iraq are the tip of the iceberg.  The Islamic terrorists, and make no mistake that that is who this war is directed at, have the ability to travel all over the world and use the tools of cowards to continue their jihad.  Since we are not fighting a standing army, and I doubt that our estimates of people involved in terrorist oganizations is close to accurate, we cannot know when we "get them all".  The ultimate solution will have to come from a coalition of world governments being willing to root out these organizations on their soil and drive them into a corner where they are considered, and please forgive the use of the term, lepers.  Once they are seen as un-touchable (in that no one wants to touch them or allow them safe haven) then we can talk about drawing lines.
853931
Kill him\n\n1. It will show terrorists that we and Iraq are serious about what we are doing. \n\n2. He is a killer.\n\n3. He must never walk the Earth again.\n\n4. You point about martyrdom is false.  You are showing that pacificism does not work.  We must deal with killers with violence.  When you have a bully, beat the jeepers out of him and he will go away.  \n\nTHE MAIN REASON WHY WE HAVE SO MUCH TERRORISM PROBLEMS IS WE DO NOT RESORT TO VIOLENCE.  WE ARE TOO SOFT ON PEOPLE WHO WANT TO KILL US.  WE DID NOT LEARN THE LESSONS FROM WW2: IGNORING EVIL ONLY MAKES IT HARDER TO GET RID OF LATER.
1053006
TERRORISM..WE LIVE IN THE AGE OF THE TERRORISM PHENOMENON!!
18922
In my opinion, the War on Terror will only motivate the terrorists even more... Though its not possible to elimate terriorism in it's entirety, its something that needs to be done.
111623
The world will never be terrorism free again.  It's a genie that's out of the bottle.  Terrorism is a tool, a weapon.  As hateful as it is, the suicide bomber was a brilliant invention; and like guns, and bombs, and the rest of our arsenals, once they've been discovered they are never going away.\n\nThis is why, by the way, a "War on Terrorism" is so ridiculous.  We can fight specific people or cultures who USE terror as a weapon.  But a war on terror is no more sensible than a war on slingshots.
142603
Global hegemony makes us a target from terrorism.  If you want more terrorist attacks, then by all means invade sovereign nations for no real reason.  However, if you actually want to keep our country safe, it's probably best to keep our heads down.
379803
we should take immediate actions to condemn, counter-attack and take preventive measures for all kinds of terrorist attacks..even those come in disguise as freedom fights...the terrorist have turn the whole world into a boiling pot..we have been in slumber long enough...wake up world...before it comes to ur door-step..
481110
Yes. If they take over Palestine fully, then the problem will be solved once for all.  Or the entire middle eastern countries where there are problems for more than 5 years,  where there are so many terrorist problems, should be taken over for administration by the combined armed forces of US, UK, Germany, France, China, India, Japan and Russia, without any self interest by these countries.
811129
There is no way you can eradicate an concept.  Terrorism is a concept.  You could theoretically REDUCE its occurrence.  You could possibly DETER its occurrence.\n\nBeyond that, it's just another buzzword.  Look at it in this context:\n\n"Nazi leader Herman Goering once remarked that it was easy to lead people into war, regardless of whether they resided within “a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.'  All that was required, Goering argued, is for their government to 'tell them they are being attacked, and [then] denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to greater danger.'"\nDavid R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of PRAVDA
1158182
First it is freedom.  True freedom, personal, religious, and political is the solution. With out that your country will continue as it is forrever.  No amount of international help (food, money, pats on the back) will help. Those things only keep those in power stay in power.
599482
Yes, It is possible to someday have a "New World Order."  I mean this in the most positive way.  It will take time and some revolutionary type of thinking however.  I have traveled all over the world and I have found that we have more in common with people of the world than we have differences.  People want the same things--good health, happiness, economic opportunity, to raise a family, hope and just governance.  We are closer than many will lead us to believe. It will begin with a vision of common grounds regarding shared values and the continuous denouncing of evil and evil rhetoric.  Certainly, there is going to be hatred and contempt, but we cannot let a small minority of "Terrorists" threaten our very existence.  People are basically good and will choice good over evil once their primal needs are satisfied.  The problem with a world society is one of fairness to all people and sectors of the world.  This becomes a major obstacle to world peace and is probably the one thing that can prevent the evolution of governance to that level.  That notwithstanding--doesn't it sound a lot better to visualize world peace than to live in a world full of hatred and violence?  And a world in which we are united against those who create chaos.  I could envision a day when we are governed by a board of our peers that are responsible for ensuring just and competent governance.
927400
That would depend on what your nation is.\nBut not much, because all nations are under a similar threat from their own secret service departments, which operate on behalf of the New World Order, to keep people terrorised.\nIf we ignore the secret service terrorism, the tiny remainder could be viewed as no real threat at all.
1114653
i am sorry to say this... but you will if only USA and other nations stop getting involved with the middle eaterns countries problem. you know, they can solve this themselves if given the chance. the armies and wars and bomb attacks are just making it worst. toleration is the key. you want peace... then let them be. if they can't stop fighting themselves, then its their problem but honestly by intervene you are just making it worst. diplomacy, communication, unity are the main thing. just because some nations are bigger and more powerful does not mean they have the right on everybody else, nation, humans and life. be realistic. think about it. oh by the way, they have jihad but not against USA its against the people who fight against their country, beliefs and religion. all muslims are in jihad mode not just in the middle east. if you don't understand the true meaning of jihad, don't ever talk about it.
143969
If you mean prevent the growth of terrorists, then it would be to bring up the standard of living in poor countries and educate the people, destroy despots and introduce a free society that allows and nurtures their specific religions and beliefs without denying others. Since there will always be poverty and governments that are cruel to their own people, it will take a long time. Effectively you have to transform entire societies.\nTo prevent the introduction of terrorist activities within the US, we should adopt similar restrictions and intelligence gathering as that in other countries that are currently under siege, perhaps similar to Israel?
890086
To protect the world from terrorists.