After we stage an unprovoked attack on Iran, what country will we force into democracy next?
406484
The next country we will force into democracy will be the State of California.
227977
We probably will go to war with Iran, but not until 2007.  This is an election year and Congress is not going to approve anything which will infuriate the public right before half of them are up for reelection.
1142993
soon, it definitely depends on Iran - if Iran does not comply and keeps going for nuclear weapons, we will be invading Iran for sure.  \n\nNear-term Iran, However I think China down the road may be WWIII if there ever is one.
248016
Let's see, what do we have to choose from?:\nIndia-Pakistan\nTibet-China\nTaiwan-China\nIsrael-Iran\nUS-Iran\nUS-Moscow \nN.Koren-S.Korea\nUS - ex-Soviet Central Asia\nDo the conflicts in the sub-Saharan region count? (just kidding)\n\n\nMy vote is for Israel vs. Iran to degenerate into a major conflict.  A US strike is improbable; the US is in no position to order an invasion of Iran, given the continuing disorder in Iraq, it could launch airstrikes against suspect nuclear facilities in Iran, but most likely it will come from the Israelis. If Iran and other Arab countries rataliate, the US may be in for a major conflict.\n\nThe next crisis in line concerns N.Korea.  Their stated intentions of acquiring an operational nuclear arsenal has sparked calls for a military solution here also (by the right-wing hawks of course). The Pentagon has already begun moving additional forces into the region, including, most ominously, a squadron of nuclear-capable B-52 bombers.\n\nThe third, is the impending crisis involving China and Taiwan.
354813
Did you watch the last war, (desert shield)?  We fired at them and they fired at Israel.  If Iran get their hands on a nuke what do you think they will do?  Let's see, I know generate power for Israel.
820595
No, why you silly Arab....we need to blow up Iran next.
166715
the longer we wait the more causualities there will be.  Something needs to be done with Iran NOW.
201248
Prepare yourself for the unthinkable, war againsty Iran may be a necessity.\n\nThe UNIMAGINABLE but ultimately inescapable truth is that we are going to have to get ready for war with Iran.\n\nToday Tehran threatended the US with 'harm and pain' for hauling them before the UN Security Council over its nuclear program.  The rapidly intensifying crisis is like a train on a collision course.\n\nWhile we were chasing phantom nukes in Mesopotamia, next door, Iran was busy building real ones.\n\nThe unavoidable reality is that we now need urgently to steel ourselves to the ugly probability that diplomacy will not now suffice, one way or another, unconsciounable acts of war may now be unavoidable.\n\nThose who say war is unthinkable are right.  Those who say the US should not send young boys to die in the Middle East far from home are right.  Those who say war will foster more violence in the Middle East are right.\n\nMilitary strikes, even limited, targeted and accurate ones, will have devastating consequences for the region and for the world.\n\nAll the argument against a strike are fearfully powerful.  But multiplied together, squared, and then cubed, the weight of these arguments do not come close to matching the case for us to stop, by whatever means necessary, Iran from becoming a nuclear power.\n\nIf Iran gets safely and unmolested to nuclear status, it will be a threshold moment in the history of the world, up there with the Bolshevik Revolution and the coming of Hitler.\n\nIran has stated that they will 'wipe Israel off the face of the map."  They've stated that the 'holocaust was fake.'  And the kind of society we live in and cherish in the West will change beyond recognition if Iran becomes nuclear.  We balk now at intrusive government measures to tap our phones or other intrusions into our civil liberties. Imagine how much more our freedoms will be curtailed if our government's fear we are just one telephone call or e-mail, one plane journey or truckload away from another Hiroshima.
989118
Well, we have reason to keep an eye on all of the countries above.  I'm personally the most concerned with North Korea.  Unlike Iran and Iraq, the North Koreans BELIEVE the garbage coming from the government, and may actually fight to the death or sacrifice everything to achieve the goals of the few fruitcakes in the government.  Iran and Afghanistan are more like Iraq, if push comes to shove, they'll fold, because the people will look after themselves first.  If something were to happen with NK, our military could certainly do some serious damage to them, significantly more then they could to us, but I don't know if we could perform a "regime change" without either significant international assistance or significant increases in our numbers.  The draft could come back into play if Korea were able to detonate an atomic weapon on our soil.  Just my opinion.
420045
I don't think Iran will back down and we will probably strike Iran with possible the help of Israel. I think that probably won't happen for several months until all else fells. This could be the start of the tribulation.
491700
Iran for sure because after Afghanistan and Iraq wars USA is quite tired and short of supplies and even a Friend countries
409665
A worst case scenario would unroll if the US were to launch a major air strike against Iranian nuclear facilities in the next few months.  A limited air strike against a "choke point", such as the Iranian uranium conversion facility at Isfahan, would like disrupt Iran's nuclear program for a long time.  The problem is what happens then?\n\nIran will respon in some way, all of which are devastatint to regional and international security.  They could lob scuds at Israel and US bases in the region.\n\nThe could block the Strait of Hormuz, cutting off the oil pipeline.\n\nThey could stop selling oil.\n\nThey could use their connections with Hezbullah to launch terrorist strikes against US interest.\n\nThey could do all or any of the above in combination. The only feasible targeting of a US nuclear attack would be the hardened facility at Natanz, under 75 ft of hard rock.  The other nuclear facilities are soft targets and can be taken out by conventional weapons.\n\nWhatever course the US takes, be prepared for the UNIMAGINABLE>
383737
Surely Iran won't start to attack,but if US or Israel attack Iran, Iran will answer them,and it's definite right to answer them,Iranian are peaceful people but they are very patriot, they can't stand attacking their country,but in this game many innocent people will lose their life, i hope Israel and US be more wise about this.
210236
I don't see anything happening over Iran too soon.  Any US president would be insane to start a war with Iran and should be sent to a psychiatric facility immediately.  The EU and NATO definitely won't do anything to piss the Iranians off, Iran has missiles that are within range of their countries.  The UN doesnt have the balls to do anything either (plus you have Russia and China who'll oppose a lot on the Security Council).  Frankly, I think Israel is the only one who can be counted on to do anything at all--which in their case is going to be military action.  That, sadly, is going to drag us (the U.S.), if not Europe, in as well.
575313
Iran ...I mean Germany has peaceful intentions.
930939
Mostly Foreign states, but if you want one chosen i would have to say IRAN, a FASCIST state setting between two country's that will be working Democracies. Iran hates its own people and ARABS so much they kill them by the hundreds.
348487
At this point, it looks like Iran will have to strike first.  Americans don't have the fortitude to start another war.