Since "BUSH" himself said the "Nuclear leak" from the Conservative Nutcases wasn't true! Whats your next Plan?
397193
Since when is what Bush says the truth?  I haven't heard a truthful word come out of his mouth yet.
1035622
Pretty pissed that our party hasn't been very conservative... Fiscally conservative - the war spending I understand, but pork spending? Oh no! \nTanked the immigration issue. Bush came in with a fair bit of the hispanic vote & a plan that would have helped pick up much more of this growing population. Now we're going to pass nearly the same plan & piss off the voting block that caused us to do it? Bad idea! \nLooked bad getting judges in! \nSocial Security? Couldn't get anything done even though it's going to crap in just a few years, will never be there in any form by the time I retire, and will seriously hurt the US economy on the way down. Yet all we did was take the hit for talking about it. \nDoing the right thing overseas, but looking bad & taking too long to do it. We couldn't have put 500k troops in there to crush that place from the start & be done with Iran by now too? \n\nWe knew in advance that Bush was not the best leader we have & that he's more liberal than 80% of our party, but we needed to take the middle to win the election & accpeted that we wouldn't get much done, but YES I'm not happy that what congress has accomplished these last 6 years has been non-conservative in nature. We'll still keep congress this fall though & I think win the Pres again in 08, I'm really looking forward to watching democrats freak out when that happens.
579211
You start with a falsehood that carries on throughout. But that's the leftist way, isn't it? Lie, lie, lie, and lie some more - because there are plenty of useful idiots who will believe you.\n\nThere were numerous reasons for the invasion of Iraq - their failure to have proven they destroyed their caches of WMD was just one of many reasons.\n\nSo, are you just gullibly stupid or are you a weasel manipulative lying sack of manure? Why would you lie to your son?
792104
He was lying, he admitted as much himself, end of story. What, are they going to say he was lying about lying, so that at least he told the truth twice? (LOL) Now, let's hope his previous statement (about Rummy staying until the end of his presidency) proves to be prophetic, and we can get rid of Bush, as well.
961638
The Democrat operative Richard Armitage admitted to being the leaker. Nothing is going to happen to him because no crime was committed.\n\nThe Liberal press did very little coverage of it. That is why you didn`t know.\nThat is also why you see all the posts here of uniformed answers about Scooter Libby who was indited for an unrelated issue and had nothing to do with the outing.
612855
Is this on Bush's list?\nMaybe he should make a test first, nuking, let's say, Texas, to see if you can actually see the oil.\n\n(just sarcasm, no offense meant)
323283
First thing we need to do is stop this war! Bring home the troops and end the blood spilling.Because everyone knows by now that we went to war on false information!
753519
Yeah Jimbo who idea in the first was it to go after WMD's in Iraq?  Have you heard any apology to the troops from Bush making that lie!
1010351
Impeach Bush! Get a new President and get out of Iraq!
826233
how do we prevent bible thumping conservatives like yourself who are dumber then a sack of rocks from taking over our country and ruining everything?
1037581
Your funny....i will laugh...........wait for it..........NOW......HAHAHAHA.\n\n\nThere is no point in name calling, i just want you to stop spreading lies told to you, I want you to research better of course...you deserve better.\n\n\n'WASHINGTON - In his final word, the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has “gone as far as feasible” and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion."\n\nhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7634313/...\n\n\nWASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. inspectors have ended their search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in recent weeks, a U.S. intelligence official told CNN.\n\nhttp://www.cnn.com/2005/us/01/12/wmd.sea...\n\n\nUNITED NATIONS — A report from U.N. weapons inspectors to be released today says they now believe there were no weapons of mass destruction of any significance in Iraq after 1994, according to two U.N. diplomats who have seen the document\n\nhttp://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/...\n\nNo weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq by the group looking for them, according to a Bush administration source who has spoken to the BBC. \n\nhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/polit...\n\n\nFour months after Charles A. Duelfer, who led the weapons hunt in 2004, submitted an interim report to Congress that contradicted nearly every prewar assertion about Iraq made by top Bush administration officials, a senior intelligence official said the findings will stand as the ISG's final conclusions and will be published this spring. \n\nhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/art...\n\n\nAND AS A JOKE>>>>>>>\nWASHINGTON — The chief U.S. arms inspector in Iraq has found no evidence of weapons of mass destruction (search) production by Saddam Hussein's (search) regime after 1991. \n\nhttp://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,1346...\n\nLook i support goal of a stable democracy in Iraq, I sure as hell want the troops safe, but this adminstration lied, and sacrificed or troops for that lie. It is time for competent leadership.
1025566
What were we supposed to do, deploy a military we had all but dismantled.\n\nHell, we didn't leave Georgie boy enough spare parts to fix a flat and he took all the blame (another slick move, don't you think?)
45244
Why should anyone trust Bush?\n\nOf course I "mind." My rights are mine, and they are non-negotiable. Why don't you invite Bush into your bedroom every night? Do you have "something to hide"?
879626
Well put from the conservative view.  Where were people like you all this time.  Bush has not only gone on this failed mission, he has almost voided the Constitution, the Bill of Rights,  he pandered to the Christian Right, he alienated most of the rest of the world, he has alienated anyone inside the country who did not agree with him by suggesting the were on the sides of the terrorists, he has  been the most divisive President I  have ever seen.  By doing all these things, he has given conservatism a bad name, and caused far too many to be more than suspicious of Republicans.  He has not only cost you all this,  he has cost  the country  far more.  It is time to abandon this "your either with us,  or your against us" mantra and go back to this country's strength - we are strong because of the variety of opinion and creative energy of all of us, not just the select few.  It is time to include, not exclude, as we face issues coming our way that will require the very best of all of us.
746351
There will be investigations.  They will start at the bottom  and work up.  If the public wants it to go all the way to the source, we will have to loudly support it, for otherwise it would be political suicide for the dems to do it.  Remember, it was only a few weeks ago that if you disagreed with the President, you were for the terrorists  and a traitor.
207668
Well, I'll clear up all the bias here.\n\nWhile it would be a good idea (we certainly shouldn't let them keep nuklear weapons) to invade Iran, I personally think that Bush is too unpopular now to start another war. If he's going to do that, he needs to spend a year or so after this war focused on internal problems. His approval rating is pretty low.\n\nI would also suggest he put more of the actual combat on the shoulders of the UN, since they would definitely be behind us in this endeavor.\n\nIn case you're wondering, I am a very conservative person, and I approve of what Bush has done so far. But I realize what must be done. Wars begun with a low approval of the leader have a tendency to turn out badly.\n\nEdit: And to the post above mine, thank you for not realizing how nuclear power works. A nuclear reactor is far more complex to construct than a bomb. A reactor needs cooling, containment. A bomb just needs two chuncks of enriched Uranium and a couple sticks of dynamite.\n\nNow, if *you* were a sect of radical Islam bent on killing all of those who weren't your belief, and you had the option of spending a few million dollars to build a bomb or a few dozen million to develop a reactor, which one would you choose? Which would be more helpful in your present situation?
503111
I likely know about as much as you do, planksheer. As with all such scandals, more details will gradually trickle out and we'll slowly become better informed. But what we know already is pretty damning.\n\nI believe admiralbob's first paragraph will be proved correct and, if so, it is crystal clear why bush was compelled to throw goss overboard last Friday. It's bad enough that these ANP sleaze with their hypocritical self-righteous moralizing engage in sex scandals that make their Democratic rivals look like choir boys in comparison, but to have a top intelligence official compromise an ongoing national security investigation due to his immoral conduct?! Jesus tap-dancing Christ, we can't have this shit going on! We're a nation at war, aren't we? Fighting evil-doers, right? Anyway, that's what The Decider keeps telling us...