What body was under 1956 constution  to guide people to live there lives in accordance with Islamic principles
404673
what does this have to do with special education?
819780
More and more people are studying Islam and funding the trurth.!\n The teachings of Islam states that the Muslim community should coexist in complete harmony and tolerance with people of other religious communities. The Qur'an prescribes that as long as the other communities do not oppress the members of the Muslim community, they ought to coexist in love and tolerance. This has been demonstrated by Muhammed (PBUH) through his life. Even the subjects of a Caliphate have no right to hamper the freedom of faith nor the freedom of worship of the non-Muslim citizens. The ruler is liable for the complete protection of their lives and property. The Prophet (PBUH) has taught that it is an unpardonable sin to be unjust to non-Muslim citizens.
890005
Guess what? Your source for your question previously is not entirely correct. Women are, in fact, allowed the right to divorce. Also, a person who speaks ill of Prophet Muhammad(swt), etc isn't sentenced to death - at least not from what I've read in fiqh books. \n\nAnd yes it is the duty of every Muslim to adhere to the Shariah as long as it is from Quran and Sunnah. period.
60535
A government with laws basically from religions like Old-Testament, New Testament and Quran.  I believe there is God and He has tried His best to guide us to make our community and personal life better by providing us Law.
645280
The ruling system that emanates from Islam is neither theocratic nor republic. It's unique; Islam is not being implemented in it's totality anywhere in the world. The misconception is that countries such as Saudia Arabia and Iran can be considered Islamic states, however, that is not the case. Furthermore, the Islamic state permits it's citizens to practice other religions, in contrast, to what was just conveyed earlier by the other person. If your intention is to attain a better grasp of the ruling system under Islam then I recommend the book that I inputed under the heading "Source(s)" in the bottom. I hope I was to some avail in respect to your inquiry.
199460
Sharia law (6th century code of barbarism) tells them to kill the infidel, the unbeliever, hence the execution of christians and jews. It's amazing in the 21st century that people still adhere to barbaric laws.
676271
The Golden Rule -- do unto others as you would have them do unto you.\nIt's a concept that's common in many cultures (not just christianity), such as karma.  It's also common sense:  basically, treat others well and they'll treat you well.\nYou don't need religion to lead a moral life.
953621
Malaysia is a signatory to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but the legislation that created the National Human Rights Commission (Suhakam), also restricts the application of the Declaration to those "fundamental liberties provided for" in the Constitution and to those provisions consistent with the Constitution. In 1999 prior to Suhakam's creation, opposition leaders and non-governmental organizations, including the Bar Council, criticized the definition of human rights as too narrow.\n\nHowever, following former Suhakam Chairman Musa Hitam's October 2001 statement that human rights would need to take a back seat in the fight against terrorism, the Commission has assumed a lower profile in carrying out its mission and has not often publicly challenged the government on sensitive subjects. The new Chairman of the Commission, former Attorney General Abu Talib, appears to favor a low-key, behind-the-scenes approach to promoting human rights.[1861]
1085651
1. The right to practice whatever Religion you wish\n2. the write to print the Truth even if it's negative\n3. the right to speak the Truth even if it is negative\n4. the right to assemble peacefully\n5. the right to petition grievances
401687
One religion hmmm this is intresting, i guess that i would pick commandments that focused on helping others and promoting a society that attempts to help others, Christanity has some good guidelines in that department, also eastern religions focus on an idividuals place in the world definitly useful. Just stay away from the dietary laws... i like food in general.
342238
Yes, this is true to some extent.  However there must be some basic level of human decency and political ethics that underlies all human transactions.  Building from this foundation, we create a framework for dialog and tolerance.\n\nChief in this basic level is the absolute provision to "live and let live".  As long as some action or belief of mine does not impact your ability to live your life as you choose, you may protest but you may not threaten or use violence.
647258
It would be nice if everyone followed them.\n\nAs for the Christian response above if you bother reading the laws you will see that you all ready more or less follow them though your own religion same thing goes for Muslims. Coincidence? Maybe...
355471
No.  In the same way that a citizen of a country should obey the laws of that country, a country of our world should obey the laws of our world.\n\nThe laws and conventions have been set out by the most powerful countries over the last century or so (since the League of Nations) and, luckily for us these countries have tended to be liberal democracies.  Liberal democracies usually protect each other and never go to war with each other anymore.  Canada, France, USA, Australia, Germany, UK etc will never fight against each other as long as they retain a freely elected government and liberal, open-minded society.\n\nThere are many corrupt and evil governments and rulers in the world, but the ones who have the most impact outside their own countries are almost always in Muslim countries.  Islam is a peaceful religion but demands of its traditionalist followers that they treat the word of God as law.  Traditionalist Sharia law is inflexible and makes little account for the change in technology, culture and society which has happened in the last 1300 or so years.  When a theocracy comes to power in the Middle East which declares Sharia law, the only flexibility they have is by massaging interpretation of the law to accommodate modern circumstances.  But no amount of interpretation can hide the underlying problems associated with human rights.  Islamic theocracies, hamstrung by their self-imposed constraints on governing, are often doomed to either collapse or resort to sacrificing the liberties of its citizens to preserve their rule and becoming increasingly more "fundamental".\n\nIran is an example of one of these "bad-guy" countries.  There is almost no attempt to conceal that Iran funds terrorists, most notably Hezbollah in Lebanon (against Israel).  They have publicly called for Israel to be wiped off the map.  The bad news is that the bad guys have audacity, resolve and versatility.  They do not pay heed to international rules such as the Geneva convention, and can send a suicide bomber into Tel Aviv or onto a train to Madrid without losing a minute of sleep.  The good guys are slowed by conscience.  We must do what is right or at least the lesser of two evils.  A leader consults his cabinet, congress, etc and must answer to his people and the international community.  However, while we are less versatile, we have the great advantage of technology.  It is for this reason that we cannot allow states which refuse to behave responsibly to start to match our level of military technology and be able to construct nuclear weapons.\n\nIran is unlikely to use its nuclear weapons when it develops them but then it is not out of the question.  The threat of Israel's nuclear deterrent may not work on leaders such as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.  Some fundamental Muslims have the ridiculous notion that a harem of virgins awaits them in heaven if they blow themselves up and scores of innocent "Zionist" civilians with them.  This idea could well be extended to a nation scale.  Most Iranians are good, peaceful Shi'a Muslims who do not want to die, but unfortunately they don't have the keys to the missile silo ...\n\nThe world may seem like it is in trouble, but as communication improves via media such as the internet, increasingly oppressed citizens will see images and hear stories of their so-called enemies in the Western world and learn that we are not all devils (although certain administrations are far from perfect).  This will in turn make them less likely to vote for parties such as Hamas or take to the hills to join Al-Qaeda and may even cause them to rise up against the powers that be in Iran.  In the meantime we must not confuse ordinary Muslims with fundamental Muslims.\n\nThe great irony is that to a Muslim, the idea of a suicide bomber is so much more abhorrent than the idea of a McDonalds on the high street in Riyadh, yet some fanatics justify purging the latter by embracing the former (broadly spe
193121
http://www.hti.umich.edu/k/koran/browse.html This is an online version in English
1037218
If you look at the history of Muslim groups, whether a family, tribe, or country, they tend to accept one person as an absolute ruler that follows the teachings of the Koran.  The exceptions would be puppet governments installed to rule over Muslim peoples by colonial type powers over the centuries.   Kings, sultans, warlords, husbands, all have essentially the same role, to decide what is best for the group and enforce their decisions with a velvet gloved iron hand.  \n\nThe culture tends to allow horrific acts (by western standards) when rules are broken and it is up to the ruler to decide what actions must be taken.  If the ruler wasn't there to rule so strictly, then each person could commit random horrific acts as they saw fit whenever they felt wronged.  This would lead to all out anarchy and the culture would allow that if there wasn't a strong leader to decide where to stop.\n\nIt is a primitive system that worked well for centuries until the western ideologies caught up with them.  The world is a much smaller place now and this old type of rule cannot work in a world community.  It must be updated to accept 'infidels' as equals in their society, not as demonic non-believers.  The more this idea creeps into Muslim society, the tougher the hard line group becomes and friction arises.  \n\nThe Christian religion tends to change as society evolves to more or less suit the needs of the  times.  Still, there are some Christian groups that feel the same way as hard line Muslim groups that the 'old ways' are the ONLY way.  Kind of creepy.
653908
Check out:\n\nhttp://www.loc.gov/law/guide/saudiarabia.html
487959
Koran's Verse 5:32\n\n"...whosoever killeth a human being... it shall be as if he had killed all mankind, and whoso saveth the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all mankind..."