what are the 2 major problems of construction of office blocks in 1967?
410533
poor design and shody materials
646896
Too much...  Flooding, traffic accidents.\nToo little...  Drought, water rationing.
1043017
Check with your city offices, like the building code dept.  Hope this helps!
814795
click here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U-2_Crisis_of_1960
494575
1 block north, 4 blocks west
883909
draw FBDs of the 2 blocks independently\nbe careful\nfind the accelrations of the  2 blocks using CONSTRAINT relations\nand comes ur answer\n\ndon't wait for the solution\nit lessens ur thinking power n creativity\n\nif it's still problematic, consult ur lecturer\n\nconcentrate on ur studies \nur still a college guy
773116
Total stagnation of the company or organisation.  Probably the worst examples of this are the National Health and Local Government.  The main features are a proliferation of managers  and assistant managers and various sub divisions! All trying to justify their existence by issuing more and more paper work!  Very shortly you get more managers than workers and these poor souls spend most of their time filling in forms!  Eventually the whole lot implodes.  Then nobody has a job.  It was a feature of all communist countries and that led to corruption and that led to economic collapse.  The EU is a prime example.
575536
Here is a great article with sample problems.\n\nHope this helps!
858071
The workers at this level are under all kinds of restraints endorsed by the Bush Administration.\n\nThe rules and regulations are constantly changing but the problems will be fixed.\n\nhttp://www.rivervalleynewspapers.com/articles/2006/11/20/businessreport/legalmatters.txt
196861
Go to the yellow pages and contact construction companies
231464
Your question is so broad you are asking for\nan answer that could earn someone a Master's degree!\n\nI would say that resources is the major problem in these areas.  Lack of water, food, shelter, education, housing, medicine, doctors, ...
717466
The art and science of designing and erecting buildings.
375551
There could be interferences depending on how your building is sited on the lot.  Keep in mind that if you are building a residence the presence of mature trees is a real plus and your building plan should preserve as many as possible.  \n\nUnless your building has a large footprint, the cost of tree and stump removal will be a tiny portion of your overall costs.  Roots must be removed in the immediate area of slabs and foundations, however roots beyond these areas will not pose a problem.
1124264
Here is a good article from a respected resource, Inc magazine. There are a ton of other topics you may find helpful as well.\n\nhttp://www.inc.com/articles/2000/03/17912.html\n\nGood luck.
535666
(a) The government should survey the businesses and/or area  homeowners, then build structures based upon that need.   (b) To know or have a friend in high-places, or become "BUDDY-BUDDIES" with several select members of the City's Zoning Commission, (who would also know our President, just in case a special CONSTRUCTION favor was needed).\n\n*Zoning: "...This commission, separates or divides municipalities into districts for the purpose of regulating, controlling or in some way limiting the use of the property, and the construction and/or structural nature of buildings, erected within the zones established...."(1) \n\nTo Intervene or Not to Intervene?  You would think our government already knows the answer here;  as our land has already been overdeveloped and our inhabitants voices have gone unheard.  What purpose(s) will the land be used for?  What about a 4-story development building recently erected, that currently blocks a homeowners view.  Did the homeowner have a voice to approve or disapprove the construction?   Was the land/structure used for or against it's inhabitants, would be my question, to you?
134548
Popular Mechinics about 1967 had one as a home build job.
894578
Don't add the two. Only the vertical distance counts in determining work because only in lifting the block did you move it against the force of gravity.