what is the best preforming mutual fund?
402722
You can go to this Morning Star site and get the best performing funds for the past year. It is ProFunds UltraJapan Inv.  Unfortunately funds that do the best one year frequently do terribly the next year.  You can also get the funds that have done best over the last 3, 5, and 10 years.  Unfortunately studies have proven that even funds with good 10 years records have a tendency to underperform the market in the future.  The Magellan fund had the best record ~15 years ago,  over the last 10 years it has not done well.
1024088
Mutual Fund\nSome or most mutual funds do not allow you to enter or exit except after the close of the trading day. \n\nIn mutual funds, unless you give the orders, it is always "in" the market. Some are limited to how many times you may trade in and out.\n\nYou have no idea whom is managing your money, and have no guarantee from past performance.\n\nA mutual fund will rarely outperform, or match the performance of the S&P or Dow because of their fees.\n\n\nETF's\nIt will take you hours of searching to find a mutual fund cheaper than investing in ETF's. An ETF has no loads or fees except for the commission, like any stock. In general, ETF's are much cheaper to trade.\n\nAn ETF will exactly match the index it is tied to, minus commission cost, which is negligible.\n\nYou can short the market with an ETF (betting on the market going down), which you cannot do with a mutual fund.\n\nThere is no "short-selling rule" like there is with stocks.\n\nI can't imagine why anyone would pay someone you don't know to keep you in the market at all times, when you can do the same thing yourself a lot cheaper, and get out when the markets get risky, like at failures at old all-time highs, like now. \n\nThe best way to do anything yourself is to learn something about it first. You'd be surprised at the thousands of books available on this one subject at your local library.\n\nBut most people spend more time deciding the color of their new car, than they do on a mutual fund advisor, for example. \n\nAre you really wanting to do this yourself, or are you asking about someone who is an expert who can do it for you?\n\nIf you invest in the stock market right now, or just buy into all the ETF's you can afford, it's a crap shoot, like rolling the dice, and the odds are probably not in your favor, whether you have an expert fund manager or not, because mutual funds are always "in" the market.\n\nThey say "Buy and Hold" for the long term is better, but that depends on when you get in, and what your definiton of "long term" is. The phrase "Buy low and sell high" infers that you buy after a decline; decidedly not the case here.\n\nThe Dow has approached all-time highs last seen in Jan 2000 and failed, so if your long-term definition is more than seven years, then you won't mind waiting another seven years for a profit.\n\nIn my opinion, the name of the game is capital preservation. When the risks are high, like right now, you get out of the stock and bond markets and park your cash in a interest bearing money market fund or CD or Treasury Bill.\n\nThis is simply not a good entry point for investors. Be patient, wait a few months, and you'll be able to buy much more stock a lot cheaper, the risks will be lower (even though they will seem higher), and your chance of success greater.\n\nIf you wish to research the “Buy and Hold Strategy” further, or perhaps trade yourself, I recommend two book titles. One is called "Which Is Better, Buy-and-Hold or Market Timing?" The other is "Do You Have What It Takes to Be a Market Timer?" They will give you plenty to think about.
192317
Unlikely that kind of growth in mutual funds.  They are for safe, slower growth investing.  You would need something volitile, like oil stock to make that much money that quickly, and you stand to lose money that way.
1007147
Actively managed funds lose their shine as the market matures and hence outperforming broader market consistently for a long period is nearly impossible.\n\nAs far as India is concerned only around 100-300 stocks are well researched and actively traded in the market and hence provide liquidity.  Fund houses which go beyond these stocks can always pick-up winners and hence beat the market index.  Just look at the how a large cap fund FT India Bluechip fund can better the Sensex index by huge margin.  An yet to mature market like India will always offer better opportunities for the fund manager for the next 10-15 years.\n\nETFs and Index funds have low expense ratios and that is plus point.  But in the diversified funds vs ETF/Index funds they are not mutually exclusive and hence they can compliment any investor portfolio.\n\nGood luck.
13235
If you doing research on funds then: \nwww.morningstar.com\n\nIf you investing in funds then it's good to open an account with large fund family such as:\nwww.fidelity.com\nwww.vanguard.com\nwww.troweprice.com
1018690
Magnum is a little bit risky with the contrarian style. I might lean towards Reliance, or HDFC out of the ones that you have named. Best in general is hard to define. The best fund for you will be the one that best matches your risk tolerance and your time frame for investing.\n\n\nHDFC:\nWITH absolute returns of around 90 per cent over the past year, the HDFC Prudence Fund remains the top choice among the balanced funds available to the investor. \n\nIts performance in 2003 reinforces the case for investing in a fund based on its track record across two or three market cycles. The NAV of the fund's Growth Plan has quadrupled since the end of 1998, and now stands at Rs 45.71 . \n\nSuitability: Investors with an appetite for risk, who are looking to build equity exposures now, should consider routing their exposures through the HDFC Prudence Fund. Given the sharp run-up in equity market levels, any investment made now in an equity-oriented fund, is likely to carry a big dose of downside risk. \n\nBut as a balanced fund with a near-40 per cent exposure to debt or debt equivalents, the HDFC Prudence Fund may provide better downside protection than a pure equity fund, while allowing you to participate in any further appreciation in equity values. \n\nPerformance: With a 90 per cent return over the past one year, the fund outperformed the Crisil Balanced Fund Index, its benchmark, by a wide margin. Though only 60-65 per cent of the fund's assets are invested in equities, the fund has managed to outpace a good number of pure equity funds, both over the past one year and over a five-year time-frame. \n\nHDFC Prudence Fund adopts a flexible asset allocation pattern; both its equity and debt exposures can swing between 40 and 60 per cent of its assets. But in practice, the fund has tended to stick with a particular asset allocation pattern for two to three years, based on its view of the equity and debt markets. \n\nFor the past couple of years, the fund has been allocating 60-65 per cent of its portfolio to equities and the rest to debt and money market instruments. In 2003, the fund appears to have periodically rebalanced its equity portfolio to keep equity in the 60-65 per cent range. \n\nBetween June and December 2003, despite the sharp appreciation in equity values and in the NAV, the equity exposure has actually fallen from 62.2 per cent to 60.6 per cent. \n\n\n\nReliance Vision:\nAn Indian fund, Reliance Vision, was the second best performing fund globally in the April-June quarter, according to Lipper Asia Ltd, which tracks approximately 80,000 funds worldwide. \n\nThe fund operated by Reliance Capital Asset Management Ltd gained 34.86 per cent last quarter, second only to Aberdeen Select Indonesian Equity Fund, managed by Aberdeen Asset Management Asia Ltd, which rose 34.95 per cent. \n\nMagnum Contra:\n\nA normal diversified equity fund is one that invests in the stocks of various companies in different sectors. Magnum Contra does the same thing.\n\nHowever, as the name suggests, it will follow a contrarian view to investing and takes contrarian bets on stocks. This means the fund manager will deliberately bypass the popular stocks that everyone else is chasing. Instead, s/he will pick stocks that have the potential to appreciate (rise in price over time) but are undervalued and out of favour with other investors.\n\nThe fund manager will focus on stocks that have strong fundamentals but are trading at a significant discount to their intrinsic value. In layman's terms, this refers to a stock whose share price is, say, Rs 15 right now but has the potential to be Rs 100 over a period of time. Yet, it does not feature in the 'favourite list' of other stock pickers. \n\nIn other words, the fund managers of such funds will invest in companies that are out of fashion, yet sound. These will be stocks that are strong on fundamentals, but whose value is not yet recognised by the market. To put it very simply, it is
17439
Try some of these links:\n\nhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&oi=defmore&defl=en&q=define:Mutual+fund\nhttp://www.mfea.com/\nhttp://www.guardfamily.org/B06/B0601/A0001_D/glossary/bhs04_glossary.html
455254
Mutual funds are a type of investment, where professional managers use your money to buy a variety of stocks (or bonds). It spreads the risk among more diverse investments so they are better than buying a single stock.\n\nIf you mean by investing in banks simply putting your money in the bank and earning interest. Then YES, mutual funds are better than that because banks pay almost no interest.
62474
Alder Capital – \n\nthe best performing unit linked fund
199313
Talk to your bank about investing in a mutual fund. Ask for high growth and moderate risk. The reason I suggest this is because it is obvious you know little or nothing of investing, this is what I would buy. You wont see the kind of returns on any other unmanaged investment.\n\nBest Wishes
970570
A mutual fund is exactly what the name suggests.It is a fund Created mutually by a no. of investors like me and you.each investor contributes some amount towards the fund and in turn receives units of that mutual fund in proportion to his/her contribution.\n\nThe fund manager will in turn invest that money in the  market and try to generate profits by selling and buying at appropriate times.\n\nhe will then pass on the profits to mutual fund holders(like u and me) after deducting his fee/commission.\n\nmutual funds have a lot of benefits\n1)it takes out the burden of managing your own portfolio of stocks\n2) it provides investors an opportunity to invest in stocks which otherwise are very expensive for a single person to invest \n3)it provides you access to professional management of your investment.\n\nmutual funds are primarily of 3 types\n\n1)Equity oriented funds:most of the money would be invested in equity instruments(shares):high risk and high return.\n\n2)Growth oriented funds:most of the money is invested in Debt instruments e.g.Bonds,debentures etc.:low risk ,low return\n\n3)Balanced funds: half the money is invested in debt ,half in equity:moderate risk,moderate return \n\nhope this helps....cheers
311039
This is a vague question.  What do you mean when you say what is the best.  If you mean safest, most have insurance guarding you on your investments if the financial service and/or trust company were to go bankrupt.  If you mean, honest, depends on what you are looking for.  Are you interested in one of these places to manage your money?  Manage your trust account?  \n\nIf you can be more specific, I will help you. \n\nGood luck!
329108
A mutual fund is your best bet.  Remember that "quick" money means risky when it comes to investing.  Better to go slow and not lose your money.
221386
Fidelity Diversified International Fund.\n\nI've been doing VERY well with it.  The fast growth is going to be found overseas for the next 10 years or so, so put some money to work outside the US.  Keep yourself diversified, but if you're not overseas, this is a good choice.  [note, if you do lose money, I'm sorry but I will too]
1049712
There is a low risk mutual fund out there, ticker symbol PRPFX.  It has never lost money in any year since it started in 1997, and has averaged a return of 6.5% each year.  Go to morningstar.com to get more information on it.  Also, you can acquire it without any fees at Charles Schwab.  Good Luck.
500935
One good choice would be to invest in a no-load mutual fund. I suggest either T.Rowe Price, Vanguard, or Fidelity.  Here are a couple of websites to help you choose a good performer.  Don't let an investment representative fool you into thinking he's worth the 5% or more commission he'll charge.  You can do your own homework, and probably get better results.  I know I do.  Good luck.  Don't be intimidated.\n\nhttp://screen.morningstar.com/fundsearch/FundRank.html http://biz.yahoo.com/p/top.html\nhttp://screen.morningstar.com/fundsearch/FundRank.html
189875
try fidelity.com or vanguard.com or schwab.com .. also cheapest is tradeking.com\n\nwells fargo is a good bank, investment fees on the funds are high however.