Who has high IQ on Nanotechnology, and mechanical engineering?
410919
In 18 hundred it was Albert Einstein, I believe he has a High IQ. But Nanotechnology is a whole new subject to some human..to be honor, I bet some people never have heard the term Nanotechnology...I'm into Nanotechnology. I been learn lesson from the pro...you should check your local libraries.or spend your money on book..
550923
Intelligence Quotient.
151933
Marilyn vos Savant has a column in a weekly magazine called "Parade."  She's listed in Guinness as having the highest IQ.
313969
Can't speak for Philosophy, but I believe for Physics the most reknown are MIT and CAL Tech.
642361
The Massachusettes Institute of Technology is renowned world over as the best engineering institute in the world.
83514
A massive IQ with an ego to match
64646
Marilyn vos Savant is a columnist, not a scientist.\n\nNewton, I have to say, kicked Einstein's booty.  No doubt, Einstein was a genius, but Newton was just that much more.  Einstein made great conclusions in well developed fields, leading to new fields, but Newton created quantitaive science as we know it.  He invented calculus.\n\nBoth were very prodigious, but i have to give Newton the slight advantage for having innovated in a desert rather than flourishing in a garden, as I would say Einstein did.  Although Gauss was a mathmatician first and a scientist second, I'd also have to say he is almost on par with Einstein.  Einstein is famous for the revolutionary nature of his works, while Gauss is known for the enormous quantity of work he turned out.\n\nMost over-rated: Galileo\nMost under-rated: James Clerk Maxwell
431177
They havent yet. Not in the usefull sense. However, I know scientists are sucessfull in creating components for nanobots. They've created ultra small engines, switches, transistors, wires, etc. The tecnological hurdle as I understand it is that 'connecting' these devices are really tricky.
608576
I am far more intelligent socially than my spouse and I am always spelling words for him, however, he is by far more mechanically intelligent than I and he is often described by people as "one of the smartest people they have ever met".  We compliment each others intelligence and have no problems.
637385
I'm assuming you mean Einstein, but I would have to go with Newton. He invented calculus and was absolutely revolutionary in developing elementary physics. Now, obviously Einstein was brilliant too, but at least he had a long background of physicists to build on. He stood on the shoulders of giants, one of which is newton.
1036105
Nerds ALL THE WAY!! Not because they study hard but because they often have the greatest personalities ever. Geek chic!
57912
Me?\n\nI don't think you can quantify such a thing. I am a scientist and work with many of the world's top minds in their specialized field. Could they manage to go grocery shopping on their own? No way, yet they can clone a cat. Go figure.\n\nA great author or poet is smart in one way, while a brilliant mathematician is smart in another.  \n\nI guess you want an all around Jack of All trades smart guy. Well Ken Jennings from Jeopardy has a lot of trivia knowledge and knows amny subjects, but no one would call him the smartest person on the planet.  Einstein was a great physicist yet he was a lousy artist.\n\nI think  you can be the best at somthing, but not the best at everything.
802119
i like scientific american and scientific american mind.  discover is also good, but im personally burnt out on it. ive rec'd it for the last 6 years and over time it just becomes too repetative.  im not sure what a good book for nanotech would be, but for dummies, or for idiots series are usually a good place to start. and sometimes you may be able to get a search result for nanotech in laymans terms.
414350
You determine a genius by his IQ.
1181566
That mother answer is a load of "housewife, can't get a job, aint gonna do anything other than squirt out kids....CRAP!"  get a flipping life you sad twat.\n\nand the answer to your question is NO......the highest Physics Position depends upon the country...if you were to look up Stephen Hawkin and Sir Isaac Newton, you might find a position which they both held/hold.  That is the highest position in Physics (academically).\n\nif you are asking the highest qualification.....kinda depends again.  Would you listen to someone who attained a Nobel Prize in Physics, or someone who managed to crack out a Phd?....hmm tricky.
269138
There are several good articles relating to this genius. One such article can be found at \nwww.rense.com/health/rife.htm
304601
MIT\n\nsee the link for more info