Do you know why india not become a developed country even it have enough resourses?
407680
The people have been suppressed for so long that they are just now awakening...like China
998487
What the question takes for granted is that there is some entity that can be called 'World Power' with all the accompanying connotations of how that power can be used over others in various ways. The question is not just irrelevant, but also dangerous in that it promotes the desire of and acquisition of power that OVERPOWERS, whereas real power PROTECTS. \nTo answer the question in a limited context, India is making progress here and there; its urban elite earns more and has access to modern technology and many comforts that are perceived as part of a lifystyle worthy of envy and emulation. Yet, there are huge slums in the cities, which portray a stark contrast between urban prosperity and urban poverty, seen as they are side by side. Millions in rural India still suffer for want of basic necessities of life and have little or no access to education and healthcare. \nIt is not only erroneous to speak of India as a world power in the making, it is ridiculous and perhaps even sad to even suggest that transition. The question, in a sense, betrays our preoccupation with POWER. If we instead concentrate on questions relevant to peaceful cooperation and coexistence, we will ensure a better world for all humanity. The least we can do is to refrain from asking such questions and by so doing save ourselves precious time and energy.
504863
Overpopulation is one of the worst problems in India. India has very high Gross Domestic Product value but beacuse of overpopulation India's per capita income is quite low. Population growth according to some recent research can also be positive for India. Europe, Japan and China are losing people and that will create a workforce shortage. Number of elderly people would increase and they will demand their pensions. That would actually be bad for their economy. However, I believe that India will overcome all this challenges, like it always has. For example - countless number of invasions and tremendous ethnic diversity.
66243
It depends on what else there is to spend on, in India's case, there is alot more stuff to spend on, health, sanitation, education, poverty, etc. If India is gathering armies and building a war machine that would be spending too much and neglecting its duties to the average citizen. Money must be spent on defense, there isnt a way to avoid it, unless you are ok with being invaded and ruled by another country. A country must have the capability to fight a war in defense of itself or be able to muster enough forces to defend itself on the hour basis. The basic idea is to have a military to defend its citizens yet have it balanced so it can satisfy basic needs of the people.\nThat said, India probably is spending too much on military, India faces no immediate threat of invasion, yet it maintains nuclear weapons falicities and lets their country's poor stay poor, maintains large army, yet has low education levels, builds weapons and buys weapons when its streets are crowded with health hazards. It also dosnt subsidize its economy (as seen that not many items are "made in India")\nhowever thats good for the US. Seeing competition from China is enough for now, some people think the US cant hold its position as world leader, but it can, if certain policies are pursued.
110026
india, although most are ignorant to this fact, is one of the highest gross producers in the world. its between the top ten economies of the world. their natural resources along with their labor make their country one of the top trading countries to date.not only that but india is the second largest country in the world in terms of population thus making it a strong work force in Asia and the rest of the world. how ever this does not make a country "better". i dont believe there is a standard according to which we can judge the "better" countries of the world since there would always have to be a specification in what areas they are "better" in
280164
My answer would have to be no, a country cannot develop economically without outside help. First of all, economic prosperity is dependent on commerce with other nations. A country cannot grow wealthy by spending its money within itself. Just as a business cannot be successful unless it buys and sells its product or service to others.\nThe United States would not have survived without trading with other nations. The original thirteen colonies took a huge chance when they declared their independence because the British were their main source of revenue. Aid from nation's such as France were what Kept America going at that time.\nThe United States is able to continually borrow money for the simple fact that we have sufficient resources to back our loans. I suppose that global lenders might consider us a good investment.
699542
Indian politics is somewhat based on exploiting sentiments and situations of illiterate and poor people, in spite of that India has huge potential of becoming one of the developed nations if our natural and human resources are properly utilised.
569115
It is a fast developing nation,in all the sheres particularly in the Information technology sector.What else u want to know?
527865
Yes, it is the one unifying factor for Indians, and so it should. It also brings in a lot of money to the country, so why not?\n\nst
1079959
China also would like to help but can't because of its close proximity to India who might be suspicious... you're on you own sorry!
1154788
If you want to improve India's economy, just look at Nehru's plan for improving India. Nehru was an inspiration to people all over the world when it comes to bringing India up as a huge power.\n\nNehru did amazing things by unifying India. He kicked the Portuguese out of Goa. He organized his country and gave Udder Pradesh, and the northern provinces enough autonomy that it included northern India instead of dividing the Sikh's and the Hindi's. He united India after the British left. He worked to give India independence in the same fashion that Gandhi did. \n\nLook at the contributions of Nehru and Gandhi and you can follow their example to improve India's economy.\n\nBefore the British left, India was a much poorer economy than it is now. Between the time that Nehru became President and the time he died, he led India from being one of the poorest countries in the world to being an independent producer of it's own food. That is an awesome accomplishment when you think of how big India is, how populated it is and how much of a difference it made in such a short time. \n\nNehru and Gandhi are awesome people for India to be proud of. If I were going to join hands with anyone, I would hope that Nehru and Gandhi were there holding hands with me.
693696
the major problem is that india is ruled by some inefficient politicians where much of the money goes to their own pockets. it does not mean that all the indian leaders are corrupted, but majority of them are , whatever b the party they belong to. this makes development of india move at the pace of a snail in terms of capital equipment.
116021
Low standard of living, under developed industrial base, low HDI... a lot of developing countries also tend to have large amounts of cheap labor (india for call centers, malasia for computer parts) which, despite common misconception, is actually very good for the developing countries.
456450
Of course,If you mean India ready to take outsourcing jobs.But India is not ready to outsource its jobs.Bcse over 36% of Indian Youth remain unemployed.
851147
I seriously 'a lack of adequate resources' is the main reason behind the failure of few start ups. Especially so if the venture is overseas. For the many market research (either physically going into the propose country / through other resources), it really does not help if the venture requires enough monetary funds at least for the first six months to support the deficit. The suppliers and distributor also plays a major role in making your venture work and careful design chain of suppliers and distributors who you can rely on - considering that 'resources' are as mentioned above but cannot be find in the country investing in which imports are much expensive and takes a longer time.
639201
For India to become a prime power in the world, it is going to have to do a superb job on ending local corruption.  A little thing Gandhi forgot about.\n\nI don't see that happening for at least 50 years.  Because India has 300 million people who speak English, and has a democratic tradition for 60 years, it will surpass China if the Chinese devolve into quarrelling and trying to maintain an economy based on "the Party."  But surpassing China, though a key benchmark, is not the same as unseating American power.\n\nBut for your dream to come true, local corruption has to shrink to the point where the smartest young people stay in the country with their PhDs instead of immigrating.
153302
yes,why not ? \nall u mention are nations that have lot of people who have smart brain and guts.and money can easily find with that 2 resources.so the only matter just time and conscious to manage and channel their resource better .