purpose,objectives and operations of world trade organisation?
408368
The World Trade Organization (WTO) is an international, multilateral organization, which sets the rules for the global trading system and resolves disputes between its member states, all of whom are signatories to its about 30 agreements.\n\nWTO headquarters are located in Geneva, Switzerland. Pascal Lamy is the current Director-General, taking over from the previous Director-General Supachai Panitchpakdi on September 1, 2005. As of December 15, 2005, there are 149 members in the organization [1] with latest being Saudi Arabia. All WTO members are required to grant one another most favoured nation status, such that (with some exceptions) trade concessions granted by a WTO member to another country must be granted to all WTO members (WTO, 2004c).\n\nSince its inception in 1995, the WTO has been a major target for protests by the anti-globalization movement
417265
TO ORGANIZE THE POLITICS AND ITS ORGANS IN SCIENTIFIC WAY \nAND MAKE IT ACCORDING TO NEW AND IMPROVE WORLD.
935573
Sorry, I don't understand what you're asking for, please add some information to clarify.\n\n\nOk, how about the topic of " The Dominance of Japanese Management in the World in the 80's and it's Decline" or "The possible effects of a South American Trade Organization on NAFTA and the EU"\nor "EU trade restrictions on US agriculture"  or "The effects of OPEC on US production/trade/economy"  or "Ramifications of China's lack of enforcement of Copyright laws on US producers" or "US investment potential in Vietnam since Normalization in Relations"\n\nas to sites....search using google, dogpile, answers.com, yahoo, msn, Jeeves....all have different priorities of which documents will come up first....takes research, any way you cut it.
464594
1. Globalisation. \n   \nNo longer can management think in the box. Focus is on the world much more than localities.\n\n2. Information Superhighway.\n\nThe World Wide Web has changed the way we market. Various options will need to be looked at before money is committed to any form of marketting.\n\n3. Delivery\n\nShipping used to be easy. With the world as your market, logistics have to be in place to meet these needs.\n\n4. International Laws\n\nThe boderless world however necessitates that we know and appreciate international laws which can affect us.\n\n5. Foreign Currency.\n\nHedging, Conversions, exchange rates etc all these are key to operating in the changing world .
504337
Given the fact "trade rules" are created and implemented by the wealthiest nations (G8), it is highly unlikely poorer nations will derive any direct benefit from those rules.\n\nIf "free trade" was "fair trade," it might be possible; but it isn't, so it isn't.
522218
Your question is not very clear, but here's are some facts and opinions on the topic.\n\nFACTS\n-----\n\nW.T.O. stands for "World Trade Organization".  The W.T.O. was created, at least in part, to reduce barriers to trade.  \n\nBarriers to trade can include direct barriers, such as government prohibitions on imports, or high taxes on imports.  Some people (mostly businesspeople who don't want any sort of government regulation) say that barriers to trade include such things as laws to protect the environment, laws to protect workers (e.g. from being exposed to poisonous substances), etc.  \n\nFree-market economists say that free trade allows the economy to function at maximum efficiency, with each country producing the products that it produces most efficiently, and then trading some of those products to other countries that produce other products most efficiently.  By minimizing barriers to trade, those economists say, we can maximize the living standards of people in all countries.  \n\nHowever, this is true only under special conditions, including the absence of "external costs".  An external cost is a cost that is not paid for by the producer or the buyer/consumer of a product.  For example, my factory might produce $1,000,000 of product per year.  But the pollution that my factory dumps in the river might cost people downstream $10,000,000 in damage.  Thus my factory, instead of producing $1,000,000 of net benefit, might actually cause $9,000,000 of net loss.  If this $9,000,000 is not paid for either by me or by the people who buy my products, then this $9,000,000 is an "external cost".  \n\nThus, although businesspeople and most well-known free-market economists generally won't admit it, environmental protection, labor protection, etc. can save more money than they cost, and eliminating those protections may reduce, rather than increase efficiency in some cases.  \n\nOPINIONS\n--------\n\nMost people's opinions on this topic are based on how their own income is affected by the WTO's trumping of environmental and labor protection laws.  People who make a lot of money from corporate profits generally want the WTO to destroy governments' ability to protect the environment and labor.  People who feel that the corporations are polluting the area that they live in or abusing workers generally emphasize that free trade is a means, not an end, and feel that governments should not allow "free trade" to trump environmental protection and labor protection.  These people feel that trade should be regulated when it causes external costs.  \n\nMy own OPINION is that our political leaders, such as George W. Bush, have expanded the powers of the WTO etc. too much.  The WTO etc. allow corporations to veto environmental and labor protections.  This allows corporations to essentially overthrow democracy and pillage the environment without regard to the harm to humans or even to the long-term sustainability of the economy.
558729
OPEC is the organisation of all oil producing countries in the world and deals with oil exports-imports issues.\n\nWTO refers to the collective policy of Free trade in the world. Meaning anyone around the world can do business anywhere else wherever WTO is accepted. Its a liberised economy.
1025240
The interesting thing about the global economy is that pertains to the entire world and all of its countries. The global economy must be healthy in order for nations to prosper economically, also, the economy can't exist without money - thus we must have enough fair trade to let less wealthy nations get involved in exportation. The idea of fair trade is definitely one of the most essential issues when discussing the global economy because of the monopolization that certain countries having on certain items, this only pushes the less wealthy countries to the side and lessens the chances of their possibly prosperity. The global economy should be fair. Fair for everyone in order to get a bunch of money. That's what life is all about, getting money. MONEY=HAPPINESS.
717711
Regulate trade between various nations.
221667
United Nations Organisation
283767
The function to make necessary action (some directions to human resource positioning/recruitment and technological support) according to the objectives of the company.
373660
For all practical purpose it is designed to help smaller associations (countries) with how they set up and run their national association.  FIFA works with the infrastructure the construction and renovation of football pitches.  The help with the administration setting up structure of associations and its staff.  The provide education for coaching, sports medicine, and refereeing.  Work hard to promote youth football, training of youth coaches, talent promotion, football schools, etc. \n\nIt is on the FIFA website if you want additional information
216405
The New York Stock Exchange's mission is "to add value to the capital-raising and asset-management process by providing the highest-quality and most cost-effective self-regulated marketplace for the trading of financial instruments, promote confidence in and understanding of that process, and serve as a forum for discussion or relevant national and international policy issues."
902041
The objective would depend on the position you are applying for.  The only generic one I can think of is to contribute to and grow with the company.
616917
The Bretton Woods Conference of 1944 proposed the creation of an International Trade Organization (ITO) to establish rules and regulations for trade between countries. The ITO charter was agreed at the UN Conference on Trade and Employment in Havana in March 1948, but was blocked by the U.S. Senate (WTO, 2004b). Some historians have argued that the failure may have resulted from fears within the American business community that the International Trade \nOrganization could be used to regulate, rather than liberate, big business (Lisa Wilkins, 1997; Helen Milner 1993).\n\nOnly one element of the ITO survived: the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Seven rounds of negotiations occurred under GATT before the eighth round - the Uruguay Round - concluded in 1995 with the establishment of the WTO as the GATT's replacement. The GATT principles and agreements were adopted by the WTO, which was charged with administering and extending them. Unlike the GATT, the WTO has a substantial institutional structure.
333672
I would guess many NGOs would practice "diplomacy."  Same with IGOs.  They are of increasing influence in the world stage.
722426
Well there's the debate whether if those effects are positive or negative in first and third world countries.  In a little more than 10 years after the creation of the WTO the world's poor nations became poorer and the rich nations wealthier.  I think any economic policy to be implemented ought to involve social development as well... it doesn't make sense to make the global exchange more efficient if the majority of people will suffer from it in the end.