When the queen dies Will Prince Charles finally get the opportunity to be a Real queen?
412226
no, they plan on making his son king in his place and skipping him...
116439
I think the convention goes that it's passed to the Progeny, so Wills comes after Elizabeth and Charlie.  As for the Edward VIII question, there are a couple of ways that could've played out.  There's some guy in Australia who could've inherited the throne by now instead of Elizabeth.
45359
Prince Charles is the current prince of wales and first in line to inherit the british throne. when Prince Charles is king, william will be the prince of wales. harry will basically get nothing b/c william's future kids would be in line for the throne of wales & britian.\n\nand please try to do your own homework next time. you can google this & find out the info but you don't know if a user knows what he is talking about or is lying.
659547
Under UK law Charles can renounce his rights (refuse to be King).  If that happened William would be King, although all the indications are that Charles is desperate to take over and will not renounce the throne.  Apart from anything it would be desperately unkind to force his son to be King in his twenties.\n\nOnce Charles does become King (and that could take another decade) he will become a lot less free.  He will be unable to express a personal opinion on anything in public.  That will be hard on Charles.
1037662
Queen Elizabeth II.  Her Majesty has been on the throne since February 1952 when her father, King George VI, passed away.  She has seen the coming and going of many world leaders in her 54 years on the throne.  She is extremely knowledgable about world affairs and has a legendary memory.  She is a valuable source of advice for many world leaders.
1137290
Charles is heir to throne and I don't think he'd abdicate.  I think its wrong to say that nobody likes him, so he's made a few mistakes in life, haven't we all!  In my opinion this should make it easier for the public to relate to him and make him the peoples monarch.  I can't blame him if he wants to be George after his coronation, Kings named Charles don't really have a good track record in this country!  I hope that the public do accept Camilla as Queen, she is so supportive to Charles and makes him look happy and relaxed, isn't this what a Queen should do for the King?  It annoys me that people go on about how she's not the prettiest woman alive but as long Charles and Camilla and happy it doesn't really matter and they have my support!
764141
the Prince Consort\n\nor King if he is the ruler
650065
The title of Prince of Wales is traditionally given to the eldest son of the Sovereign. This is not automatic but is granted at the discretion of the Sovereign. Once the Prince succeeds to the throne, the title with merge with the crown until it is granted again, most likely to Prince William. \n\nActually Prince Charles studied the Welsh language in University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, shortly before his investiture as Prince of Wales in 1969. He made a speech in Welsh and English during this ceremony. \n\nFor information on the title of Prince of Wales, Prince Charle's creation as Prince of Wales and his investiture, see the links below.
767894
Seems to be going, thanks to her boyfriend's persuation and Virgin owner Branson...\nBut you never know, the Queen could always forbid her, as she _might_ inherit the crown someday.
789168
Many, many people think so, I'm not sure if she was myself, but if you look around online you can see evidence for both sides.\n\nLike, did you know that Diana was actually alive after the crash? There's actually a photograph of her in the car after the wreck with her eyes open. And people say she would have lived if the ambulance wouldn't have driven so slowly and passed several hospitals on the way. It's really interesting to research, you should check it out.\n\nIf she was, I'd say it was definately by the royal family's request. There's rumors that she was going to marry that Dodi guy, or was possibly pregnant with his child, Charles wanted to remarry, or even just she was supporting Palestine. I dunno the truth, I wish I did :o I listed one site to give you some theories and evidence and such, but look around google and you'll find tons!\n\nSo far that I know of, it's been declared just a tragic wreck. There's rumors the driver of her vehicle was drunk, I dunno if that turned out to be true or not.
94274
As an American, I have nothing to say about it but then again, the average British subject has nothing to say about it either.  Prince Charles has done very little to regain the popularity he lost following his split with Princess Diana.  His ongoing relationship with Parker-Bowles made him look out of touch with reality, yet the age spread between himself and Diana may have been the biggest problem between the two. They probably could not identify with each others generation. Prince William seems to be the odds on favorite for taking over the throne.  One has to wonder if Charles really wants the job anymore.  His mother could step down and let him have some of the glory, yet she chooses not to relinquish her authority.  I doubt that his marriage to Camille has helped his relationship with mum. So, he may be taking the path of the old Duke of Windsor, its not as though he needs the money.  William would be a fine choice as the next King of England.
1041062
There has been talk in the past of doing away with royalty in the UK.  They no longer have any say in government affairs but they do serve a purpose, as good will ambassadors and someone for the rest of us to talk about ;-)
905717
Prince Charles is married to Camilla Parker Bowles
329676
king charles the second\n\nthis link may help you
429183
I doubt it, although it's not a bad idea.\nI think modern day royals are less into being royal nowadays, and it's just not practical to be so far removed from society and clueless as to how regular people live their lives. Queen Elizabeth's younger children, Andrew and Edward, have really strayed from the typical royal routine and are fairly "normal" people. I think this trend is likely to continue in the future, which is good!\nAnyhow, as to marrying outside the royal circle, I think because these younger royals are more involved in a normal everyday style of living (as far as a royal CAN be, that is) I think the more at ease they are with so-called commoners and have more in common with them, personality-wise. Fifty years ago, NO ONE in the royal family would have considered marrying someone like Sarah Ferguson or Sophie Rhys-Jones, who worked for a living and so forth.\n\n(As for the "inbreeding" comment, royals all over the world have been inbreeding for as long as the concept of royalty has existed.)\n\nI think if the Queen had had her way, none of her children would have been allowed to marry any of the people they did. Ok, well, MAYBE Diana. ...MAYBE.
929704
He was born Prince of Greece and Denmark in Corfu in 1921, but renounced his Royal title when he became a naturalised British subject in 1947. Just prior to his marriage to the then Princess Elizabeth, King George VI created him Duke of Edinburgh, Earl of Merioneth and Baron Greenwich,\n\nSome time after H.M. ascended the throne, she created him a Prince of the Realm.\n\nIMO, he never was given the title "Prince Consort", which had been the title of Prince Albert, the Prince Consort.\n\nIn British Royalty, a "King" has precedence. Also, a King would designate that he was the Sovereign, the Monarch; that he had became such by inheritance.  Since such is NOT the case, therefore he is NOT King (or king consort).  Her Majesty inherited the Throne; since she is the Sovereign, the Monarch, she is designated as Queen Regnant -- Reigning Queen. \n\nNormally the wife of a King is a Queen Consort. Still questionable whether Camilla will get that title or not.\n\nYou asked "He is married to Queen Elizabeth so why is he just a Prince instead of King Consort?"  \n\nIt is because he is married to a Queen Regnant.
885415
Since his active period overlaps the time when Elizabeth I was on the throne, definitely yes.  You might say late Elizabethan, as he was active after her death as well.