What was it that Russell Crowe got arrested for?
415490
punching, hitting someone in the face as USUAL!
708514
I wonder what you got arrested for?  Whatever it was hurts your credibility in the eyes of the police.  I don't know if they can refuse to allow you to file a report, but even if you do, It will not be taken too seriously because you got arrested.  You could talk to a lawyer about it, but I think you would be wasting your money.\n\nGood Luck.
8
Not sure if this is the origin, but I think it was popularized in the 1989 film "Tango & Cash". After Tango, played by Sylvester Stallone, and Cash, portrayed by Kurt Russell, were thrown into jail and setup in a failed jailbreak attempt, the bad guy Yves Perret (Jack Pallance) locked them in the boiler room with a bunch of felons Tango & Cash had put in jail. Prior to unleashing a can of whoop-ass, their conversation was as follows:\nGabriel Cash: I don't know about you, but I have an aversion to getting F.U.B.A.R...\nRay Tango: What's F.U.B.A.R.?\nGabriel Cash: Fucked-Up Beyond All Recognition.
55661
Your question is a little vague.  What state did this happen in?  Are you (or are any of the occupants) of the vehicle on probation or parole?  Did you give permission for your vehicle to be searched?  Do you know why it was searched?  Were alcohol or drugs in the vehicle (or was there any indication that alcohol or drugs were in the vehicle?) When you say it was seized, are you referring to the police actually taking it away from you, or are you just saying it was seized while they searched it?  You ask what to do...depends on what happened.  Were you cited?  Arrested?  Was contraband of some kind found?  The issue of probable cause to search anything can often hinge on very small details...I'll suggest that you're going to have a difficult time finding cases that will assist you in getting an education.  You can try searching through FindLaw.Com and see where that gets you.  If nothing came of the search (nobody was arrested or cited or anything), then perhaps you want to consider complaining about the officer's action to his department.  If something came of it, and you're going to court, then you need to speak with an attorney.  I may be able to help you sort some of this out if you'd like, but we'd probably need to do that in email.  Post an address if you'd like...
171367
Yes, He was arrested last week in Florida on charges concerning improper behavior with a minor...\n\nHere is a quote of his to RacerX-\n\n"What it looks like it is - what it says it is - it's not. It's not that,"
1033564
The poster above still just is'nt getting it\nSince when was reporting an actual infraction of the law a smear campaign?  The man was caught with an illegal documented perscription, end of story, THIS ACTUALLY HAPPENED.  Now if some people choose to smear him that is their own perogative, but simply stating a fact is simply stating a fact
540166
The crime is escape from lawful custody.  At the time of the escape the custody was due to the conviction, and was lawful.  The offence has been committed.
1174774
what it the army's mp's arrested yall ? if so what rights do you want read to you ? they dont have to read a thing to you.\n\nUCMJ\n\n807. ART. 7. APPREHENSION \n(a) Apprehension is the taking of a person into custody. \n(b) Any person authorized under regulations governing the armed forces to apprehend persons subject to this chapter or to trial thereunder may do so upon reasonable belief that an offense has been committed and that the person apprehended committed it. \n(c) Commissioned officers, warrant officers, petty officers, and noncommissioned officers have authority to quell quarrels, frays and disorders among persons subject to this chapter who take part therein. \n\n808. ART. 8. APPREHENSION OF DESERTERS \nAny civil officer having authority to apprehend offenders under the laws of the United States or of a State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession, or the District of Columbia may summarily apprehend a deserter from the armed forces and deliver him into the custody of those forces. \n\n809. ART. 9. IMPOSITION OF RESTRAINT \n(a) Arrest is the restraint of a person by an order, not imposed as a punishment for an offense, directing him to remain within certain specified limits. Confinement is the physical restraint of a person. \n(b) An enlisted member may be ordered into arrest or confinement by any commissioned officer by an order, oral or written, delivered in person or through other persons subject to this chapter. A commanding officer may authorize warrant officers, petty officers, or noncommissioned officers to order enlisted members of his command or subject to his authority into arrest or confinement. \n(c)A commissioned officer, a warrant officer, or a civilian subject to this chapter or to trial thereunder may be ordered into arrest or confinement only by a commanding officer to whose authority he is subject, by an order, oral or written, delivered in person or by another commissioned officer. The authority to order such persons into arrest or confinement may not be delegated. \n(d) No person may be ordered into arrest or confinement except for probable cause. \n(e) Nothing in this article limits the authority of person s authorized to apprehend offenders to secure the custody of an alleged offender until proper authority may be notified. \n\n810. ART. 10. RESTRAINT OF PERSONS CHARGED WITH OFFENSES \nAny person subject to this chapter charged with an offense under this chapter shall be ordered into arrest or confinement, as circumstances may require; but when charged only with an offense normally tried by a summary court-martial, he shall not ordinarily be placed in confinement. When any person subject to this chapter is placed in arrest or confinement prior to trial, immediate steps shall be taken to inform him of the specific wrong of which he is accused and to try him or to dismiss the charges and release him. \n\n811. ART. 11. REPORTS AND RECEIVING OF PRISONERS \n(a) No provost marshal, commander or a guard, or master at arms may refuse to receive or keep any prisoner committed to his charge by a commissioned officer of the armed forces, when the committing officer furnishes a statement, signed by him, of the offense charged against the prisoner. \n(b) Every commander of a guard or master at arms to whose charge a prisoner is committed shall, within twenty-four hours after that commitment or as soon as he is relieved from guard, report to the commanding officer the name of the prisoner, the offense charged against him, and the name of the person who ordered or authorized the commitment. \n\n812. ART. 12. CONFINEMENT WITH ENEMY PRISONERS PROHIBITED \nNo member of the armed forces may be placed in confinement in immediate association with enemy prisoners or other foreign nationals not members of the armed forces. \n\n813. ART. 13 PUNISHMENT PROHIBITED BEFORE TRIAL \nNo person, while being held for trial, may be subjected to punishment or penalty other than arrest or confinement upon the charges pe
966790
After a good cry? Jail time!
1046669
Nope-the police have to submit the information to a court. The court issues a warrant. The person is arrested.
1021079
There may be an on going investigation that you are not aware of.  Please speak to the policeman that you gave the report to and ask for an update.  Sometimes what we think is a done deal, is not enough for our courts to hang someone with.  I'm glad you had the courage and fortitude to do something about it.  Good for you!
829341
It was apparently found to be an accident.\n\nHe's most likely going to punish himself daily more than any jail could.  He probably knew and was buddies with the deceased....
835385
He got away with it for racial reasons.  One of the jurists stated on television that she knew he killed "that white woman" but that she wanted to teach the city a lesson after the Rodney King verdict.  For anyone else, that should have disqualified the verdict.\n\nWhat is he doing now?  Making money and flaunting his dirty laundry.  It's pretty close to a confession, but he's safe and he knows it.  He's got all his money locked up so that even the civil verdict that was decided against him cannot be enforced or collected upon.\n\nOJ Simpson is one of the most sordid, craven and worthless human beings we have the misfortune to share the planet with.  We can only wish something painful and horrid happens to him.
1150151
I actually am curious now. How will we know when he gets arrested?
204446
Most people would not agree with me but I steer awwy from Russell Crowe movies. He's annoying although "Gladiator" was cool.
504947
It advised an individual being arrested of his/her legal rights.  The right to remain silent is the most important one.  Talking can easily incriminate an individual.
970449
Here's the link to his mug shot from the arrest. He was arrested at the airport because the found a gun and marijuana in his car.\n\n\nhttp://www.thesmokinggun.com/mugshots/snoopmug1.html