everything about associative intelligence?
396253
Hi, What do you mean with your q's? Anyway here are a few links for "associative intelligence" - maybe there is something you are looking for.
507699
C would be more efficient for artificial intelligence, if you are thinking about one or the other.  But there are other languages that would be better suited for this task, such as LISP.
964689
That is the associative property.  In addition, it doesn't matter what order you add things in, so you can "associate" any grouping of additions and get the same result:\n\n(a+b)+c = a+(b+c)\n\nNote that this is true for multiplication as well:\n\n(a*b)*c = a*(b*c)
1174734
here's some good info and an interactive quiz:\nhttp://library.thinkquest.org/10977/start.html\n\ntry this link:\nhttp://www.colorado.edu/pwr/occasions/alicemath.html\n\nif nothing else it does "stretch" your mind.  Enjoy!
684350
Yes, we all are capable of absorbing the same amount of knowledge except as mentioned people with disabilities. Studies are now showing we all have different learning patterns but it doesn't necessarily mean higher intelligence. We are all exceptionally smart creatures. All of us.
55663
That depends on your definition of intelligence.\n\nThis is just the way I see it, machine learning is a machine learning, by training or whatever process, how to execute a process rather than it being preprogrammed. An example of this is the adaptive programming in the engine control computers of cars that have been around for almost 20 years.\n\nArtificial intelligence would, in my opinion, not only would it learn what to do, but also decide when to do what it wants to do. Intelligence, at least partly, is the ability to make decisions without instruction and programming.\n\nI know that this is vague, but I am not sure if that is what you were looking for. Hope this helps.
326954
I did not take this specific course in college however I have studied it extensively since I have been practicing. I honestly believe it supplies more answers than many of the theorist were able to provide.  It of course is used in conjunction with theories in practice but there is honestly an area you miss out if you don't cover it.  Try reading Molecules of Emotion, I can't think of the author, she writes in a way that is very down to earth and yet really explores the impact of emotion on neurochemistry.  From their it is easier to expand into the concepts of behavior.
1050272
I not very sure where your ID is but my guess would be the frontal lobes. Ok, firstly it is believe that a marvellous signal is responsible for memory and cognition; and the would be the theta phrase. This (through experimentation) is proven to be responsible for spatial memory. When you are required to do navigation, the hippocampus (mainly the right side) is activated. Thus we believe that our intelligence is probably due to our hippocampus. However, in recent studies, it is found that the medial septum and the perirhinal cortex also have theta. Thus it is proposed that recall and recognition is done but different pathways in your brain. So if your want to have an electronic brain, you need to be able to produce this theta phrase. Another thing to take into consideration is Long Term Potentiation(LTP). LTP is due to repitative synaptic activity. If your circuit cannot have LTP-like effect, you remeber nothing. Lastly, electronic implants being man-made will be unable to perform as well as neurons which is by nature as neurons also secrete substances and circuits cannot do so. With current technology, it is theoratically impposible to build an e-brain
747450
Sounds like Combinatorics.  Combinations, permutations, a bit of graph theory, discrete math, I usually describe it as "Advanced Counting".
224978
associative, commutative, identity, inverse
1088895
I have. I am not aware of any specific research into the concept (at least not direct research). I have found that synergy has an odd way of just kind of cropping up in ones life if one has the sense to look for it. I also tend to think in a more expansive pattern rather than linear habits that I had developed when younger- I often find myself extrapolating on concepts that have been familiar to me for some time and seeking new ways to integrate them into other, less conventional modes than I had originally understood them to be applied. I am an inventor, artist, artisan, and student of engineering and have been most grateful to R. Buckminster for his fascinating (and sometimes weird) contributions to my own thought patterns.
52382
Do your Theory of Knowledge Paper yourself :-)\nbut remember everything we experience is part of our personal attributes
1085765
Here's a few that I've looked through that have some good basic information and some other resources for more detailed information:\n\nBack-Propagation Neural Network Tutorial\nhttp://ieee.uow.edu.au/~daniel/software/libneural/BPN_tutorial/BPN_English/BPN_English/\n\nNeural Networks in Plain English\nhttp://www.ai-junkie.com/ann/evolved/nnt1.html\n\nIntroduction to Neural Networks\nhttp://www.willamette.edu/~gorr/classes/cs449/intro.htm\n\nNeural Network Theory - A short tutorial\nhttp://documents.wolfram.com/applications/neuralnetworks/index2.html
777739
Intelligence is a property of mind that encompasses many related mental abilities, such as the capacities to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend ideas and language, and learn. In common parlance, the term smart, metaphorically used is frequently the synonym of situational and behavioral (i.e. observed and context dependent) intelligence.\n\nAlthough many regard the concept of intelligence as having a much broader scope, for example in cognitive science and computer science, in some schools of psychology, the study of intelligence generally regards this trait as distinct from creativity, personality, character, or wisdom.
1026552
I also could not find anything on the web. try buying the book, or borrowing it from your local library, and getting the information you need direct from the source: The Science of Correct Thinking - Logic.
205230
Harry Lorraine and Jerry Lucas wrote a book called "The Memory Book."  They did shows where they memorized every name in the audience during the show, and memorized whole magazines, including pictures for the show (within a week).\n\nTheir system used association.  If someone's name is John, for example, you picture their face in a toilet.  You have to associate something absurd with each word to link them together.  I did it to pass botany lab, and I had the answers memorized (genus and species by looking at picture), but I had no clue what I was talking about.\n\nbanal sounds like a.n.a.l, so a.n.a.l is boring, fatuous--flatulation comes from a.n.u.s, cackneyed--I hacked up a loogie when I flatulated, mundane--mud came from my a.n.u.s, prosiac--I took prosac so that I could perform a.n.a.l....etc...... (I had to use dots between the letters because it is considered a bad word and won't show up).\n\nIf you picture this crap, you will NEVER forget that trail of words.
54487
A big problem is that we ourselves can't pinpoint a definition of intelligence. We have tests for intelligence (e.g. the Turing test) but there is still disagreement as to whether passing this test would consititute being intelligent (e.g. the Chinese room experiment). With no clearly stated goal, we can't formulate a feasible strategy for reaching the goal, nor can we definitively say we have reached the goal.