what are the major debates in the study of international relation?
395938
The current major debate in international relations theory is that between Neorealism and Neoliberalism. The Neorealists believe that the international order is one that is based on anarchy and states are the chief actors. The main goal of states is security and self-preservation and their chief object is power or the balance of power.\n\nNeoliberals believe that states are the chief actors but they claim that there are grounds for states to cooperate, mainly through international institutions and also through a claim called the Democratic Peace Theory - that democracies tend not to fight other democracies. Furthermore, they say that hard power - or military power - is not the only thing that states focus on.
865542
War\nPeace\nCorruption
5320
You can find an article "U.S. Foreign Policy Objectives and Priorities in the Middle East and the Rest of the Globe" on US Foreign Press Center website >> http://fpc.state.gov/fpc/21564.htm. Going through this article you will get an idea.\n\n>>> Naveen Kumar
411197
you could do theology. I did my paper on argument between theology and teleology. depending on your level of understanding (i don't know what class you're in), you could discuss similarities and differences between paley's and ayala's argument. lemme know if you need more help. i'll post a few websites for you to research this topic in depth.
1041712
It is the dynamics of interstate conflict. Check out some of the work from FA Hayek
215172
http://humanitiesconference.com/ProposalSystem/Presentations/P001314\nhttp://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/\n\nHope it helps :-)
700592
It depends on what the conflict is.  WTO handles some items. \nThe UN handles others. \nThird parties volunteer to hear the case as a mediator.  \nSome times just plain battling it out in the media.\nSome times secret negotiations. \nand probably other methods.
760834
Maybe you should redefine your subject. Diplomacy requires multilateralism. No progress towards consensus occurs without it. Two nations may have apparently very unilateral foreign policies adverse to one another, but the moment they conduct any diplomacy even those policies become multilateral or they will likely make no progress in any negotiations.
492498
Child Abuse (domestic, international, internet)\nChild Trafficking\nRefugee and displaced children\nHIV Aids and other life threatening diseases\nPoverty\nImmigration Detention of minors\nHuman Rights\nTorture
333672
I would guess many NGOs would practice "diplomacy."  Same with IGOs.  They are of increasing influence in the world stage.
214143
I have never spared the chance to talk about controversial topics with all kinds of people, leftists, right wingers, communists, etc.\n\nPeople just don't realise that talking about things usualy solves half of the problem. TALK TALK TALK. You must always talk.\n\nI was very SHOCKED at Yahoo Answers for removing some of my questions where I asked about things like "WHY did the British Give the Palestinian Mandate to the Zionists". i found it very shocking that Yahoo would censor me.\n\nI have also participated in tens of International student forums in many different countries in Europe and even in the Middle East.\n\nYou can't imagine how people want to talk about important issues. Everyone has his or her own fear, and they need to talk about it.\n\nThe best thing to do for bridging the global divide is to think like a citizen of the world, and to start realising that that kid in Alabama riding his bicycle is as worthy as that Palestinian kid running in his worn out shoes away from an approaching Israeli tank.\n\nOr that Sudanese child in Darfur who is escaping a barbaric genocide.
377292
an excellent topic would be the case of american-iranian courts prosecuting saddam hussein.like they did mussolini.
151258
war theory deals with the justification of how and why wars are fought. The justification can be either theoretical or historical. The theoretical aspect is concerned with ethically justifying war and forms of warfare. The historical aspect, or the “just war tradition” deals with the historical body of rules or agreements applied (or at least existing) in various wars across the ages. For instance international agreements such as the Geneva and Hague conventions are historical rules aimed at limiting certain kinds of warfare. It is the role of ethics to examine these institutional agreements for their philosophical coherence as well as to inquire into whether aspects of the conventions ought to be changed.
281835
try "The Great War For Civilisation" by Robert Fisk.  You will need to go back further than 20 years too as the current problems are rooted in the decisions made after the first and second world wars.  This book covers other countries in the Middle East too.
79613
INTERNATIONAL relations are always based on INTERESTS not on theories.  But theories are used to legitimate everything.
715193
international-between nations\nthiryish\nstylist\nhomeless\ncriminology\nmacromedia\nmalpractice\nhear is a few that i could think of
518593
1 Lack of a Visionary Leader in either Party\n2 Misguided approach to foreign policy(Iraq,Iran, North Korea, Afghanistan,and India)\n3 Trade Imbalance and Current Account deficit....The day of equilibrium will come....\n4 Teachers Unions in Education\n5 Lack of overall fiscal constraint\n\n\nEdit...Independent....now how about a thread on actually resolving any of these issues...