what does abstract judgment mean and what would veteran affairs have to do with it?
396737
An abstract of judgement is just a summary of a judgement, a ruling made by a court.
593758
Judgment is a court order binding on both sides.  Fact dependent whether you can have set aside and a new trial.  The trial is usually final.  Maybe the facts weren't on your side?
502990
Advance rulings under service tax law means:\nThe determination by authority of a question of law or fact specified in the application regarding the liability to pay service tax in relation to a service proposed to be provided by the applicant. \n\nAn applicant can be a non-resident or resident who is starting a commercial activity in joint venture with a non-resident.
103720
It means "from the office"  -- that is, it refers to something which is so because of the authority of a person's office or position.  In a courtroom, a judge's authority might be said to be "ex officio."
580587
A qualified report has noted certain shortcomings, as per the following definition from the American Heritage dictionary: "4. To modify, limit, or restrict, as by giving exceptions."\n\nAn unqualified opinion can only be issued when there are no material exceptions noted in the testing performed (such as a "scope limitation") or the results of testing.
306475
If you are a cop in the line of duty, or a soldier in areas of active combat, or for purposes of self protection.\n\nOr if you are vice-president and just had an error in judgement.
716978
It means that someone remains impartial and does not agree with one side or the other in a dispute.\n\nA sample sentence:\nA neutral mediator helps people resolve their disputes because he listens to everyone, he identifies areas where they can reach agreement, and he never takes sides.
240788
sounds like the article's generalising at a rate of noughts, & so afaic it means don't take it remotely seriously.\n, you'd bee wasting your time
1108927
It means that you may file a new suit on the same cause of action.\n\nYou may file a motion to reconsider the ruling.  This usually requires that you have new information that you did not at the time of your last hearing.\n\nYou may appeal the ruling to a higher court.  In an appeal you need to show that the judge had faulty legal reasoning.   They do not re-evaluate findings of facts on appeal.  You will need an attorney to do an appeal properly.
1108860
that means there has been a decision made against you.  whatever the judgment may be, it is a decision made by the judge (and sometimes jury) that you are at fault.  usually it results in an awarding of money for the other party - to be paid by you.  a motion for consideration is what you file when you want the judge to consider a point.  they are filed on any number of issues and without more info, i wouldn't be able to tell you what the judge was being asked to review.
465813
It is a decision number\nperhaps you are being asked to be more decisive.\nAlso take a good look at your beliefs and your spirituality
15683
Its not theat he may not believe in it.  it doesn't matter as much to a suprem court justice except in relation to their past cases.  Stares Decisis mearly means that lower courts must follow the some opinion of the higher courts.  Being on the supreme court of the land, Thomas is not bound by any other court decisions, so really he doesn't technically have to follow any judgments.
894823
This can't be answered without more information. What kind of judgment, what state, when and under what circumstances was the judgment issued.
478115
abstract of judgment - A copy or summary of a judgment that, when filed with the appropriate public office, creates a lien on the judgment debtor's nonexempt property. • This lien gives the judgment creditor the right to attach the judgment debtor's property. (source: Black's Law Dictionary)\n\nlien - A legal right or interest that a creditor has in another's property, lasting usually until a debt or duty that it secures is satisfied. • Typically, the creditor does not take possession of the property on which the lien has been obtained. (source: Black's Law Dictionary)\n\nWhat this means in English: You've won a case against someone. You can file the abstract, and it creates a lien against that person's property -- it allows their non-exempt property be sold off to pay off the amount of the judgment. That is, with the sale, its pays off what you're owed. Some property will be exempted from possible sale; what that is depends on where you are, and such.
941654
Well in most instances you can't simply "appeal" a final decision because you have newly discovered evidence because an appellate court can only consider the record as provided by the trial court. The proper action would normally be to file a motion in the court issuing the judgment, before taking an appeal (this way, if they deny the motion, you have something to appeal that the appellate court would have jurisdiction over). \n\nI don't know what jurisdiction you are in, but in federal courts it would be governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) [See below]. However, to preserve the sanctity of judgments there are stern limitations on setting aside judgment based on newly discovered evidence. It must be evidence that "due diligence" would not have discovered during the trial and, although not expressed in the rule, I believe most courts require that it be materially prejudicial, in that it is likely to have a substantial impact on the judgment. Also, it cannot be more than one year after the entry of judgment.\n\nReally, unless this is really huge evidence and it is under one year, you are out of luck.
659396
Until the investigation is complete - it is pointless to speculate.\n\nI do advise you to avoid making an assumption that what appears to be an isolated incident reflects the status of the rest of the military.  If you assume that this in any way is an indication of the state of the military then all you are going to do is make yourself look foolish.
578371
well.. if you don't care about your benefits, and don't plan on coming back in the military... then no... it simply means that you are unqualified for military service... Now the truth is it is usually associated with some sort of physical or moral disqualification.  \n\nMany employers ask if you've ever served in the military and if so did you receive an Honorable Discharge... a General Discharge is considered the same as a Less Than Honorable discharge. What a future employer may or may not do with this information is up to them I suppose... but that is the only effect that I can see in a RE-4 w/ General Discharge.