what is the difference between a signed statement and a signed letter for production in a court of law.?
400123
If I undestand your question correctly, a signed statement is a statement made, usually to the cops or the court, directly giving one's information/story/etc. to them regarding the case/issue at hand.\n\nA signed letter for production can be a letter seized as evidence that is used in the case, but was written at some other time not necessarily to the court/cops/etc. directly about the case.\n\nDoes that make sense?  Say you gave a statement to the cops about a crime you committed-signed statement.  Or else say the cops found a letter you write your brother telling him you robbed a bank and they use it as evidence-signed letter for production.\n\nThis may be wrong, but without context, that is the best I can come up with.
742495
The outcome of what was being decided in court is being withheld.  Could be a closed file (closed to the public for whatever reason) or because the judge wants more time to render a decision.
526713
It is the same as tendering and passing forged documents.\n\nFrom Smith v. State 13 Ga.App. 663, 79 S.E. 764\n(1913):\nBut it is manifest that this objection is without merit because the words "pass or tender" are synonymous with the words "utter and publish." If the accused uttered the forged instrument, he published it. If he passed it, he uttered and published it; and, if he uttered and published and passed it, he necessarily tendered it.
774301
Before you file the Answer with the Court, you must mail a photocopy to the other attorney.  In most states, you must get someone else to serve the documents.  They must sign a declaration under penalty of perjury that they mailed a copy fo the opposing attorney.  The declaration is attached to the answer and filed with the court.
239610
You can write up your own.  I would google for some examples, but honestly a statement describing what the instrument is intended to do, and have it notorized, signed, and recorded...and you're done.
599774
I think it is treated as a signed contract butit is up to the courts to decide
32973
The basic gist of it is that, in most cases the original document has to be entered into evidence. The whole text is in the site below.
99113
In the US, this agreement is usually nothing more than a contract.  So, there should be no reason to have it notarized.
901237
Sport -- I'm not a U.K. solicitor or barrister, but in the U.S., e-mails are regularly admitted in evidence for al kinds of purposes.  As you've noted, the difficulty is if someone denies that they sent the e-mail in question.  IN the U.S. we have rules for admissibility of evidence, but, generally, so long as there is someone who can testify that (a) the e-mail address is the one customarily used by the author and/or (b) there are certain charadteristics of the e-mail which indicate its source, then a court will likely admit the evidence.   If the other party denies the evidence, then that's a fact question for the factfinder (in the U.S., usually a jury) to resolve.\n\nSure, when wanting someone to be bound by "their word" -- getting something signed by them and notarized is the most solid (of course, that doesn't mean that the contract will necessarily be valid, as there are lots of reasons that a contract may be declared invalid, like lack of consideration, unconscionability / coercion, fraud, etc. etc.). Probably followed by a signed written document, signed in front of a witness (non-notary).  Followed bya signed document, with someone who can testify that the signature on the document is authentic (because that witness is familiar with the signor's signature). Probably followed by some other kind of document, like a typewritten /s/ document or e-mail.  Probably followed by a pure oral agreement (in most circumstances, oral agreements are binding, if the parties intended to bind each other.  there are circumstances, at least in the U.S. to this doctrine, however).\n\nI hope you get some response from someone in the U.K., because there certainly can be differences in the law (even with our common legal heritage), so don't take anything I say as definite.
1074479
just means that ALL CONDITIONS must be met prior to the signing. Occuring in Wet States only. California, being a dry state, can draw loan documents and have them signed the day of the application (which I'd done 100's of times while working at Instafi.com) and meet conditions after the signing, however states such as North Carolina cannot sign loan documents until all the conditions of the loan are met.
1144061
Umm, no.\nThe note is anonymous.  No signing is needed.  If you need to use parting words, Warm Regards is the best of the choices.
953343
It could mean almost anything, depending upon the context.\n\nA pre-trial statement could be made by a defendant, as part of an allocution or preliminary hearing. It could be made in a civil case, at a motion hearing or by sworn declaration. \n\nA pre-trial statement is a statement that is made as part of the court record (usually under oath) and that occurs before trial. Other than that, I can think of a dozen situations where it might occur.
400238
well if you are being asked to sign one then your soon to be is making you sign your rights away to what will really be yours when you are married. If you get a divorce all you have left is you.
688649
Well one was written in english, the other in latin. That's kind of a difference.
40241
Depending on the document it does not have to be notarized to be "legal." In fact, a contract does not have to be written to be binding. (This is the case in every state.) If you are talking about a simple agreement between two people, having it notarized can help prove the the people involved actually signed it, but won't help with much else.\n\nHowvere, notarized or not, an agreement can be unenforceable for a variety of other reasons. (The real quetion about an agreement is whether it is enforceable. It doesn't really make sense to refer to ask whether it can be made "legal.")
1177755
on-line and off line rules (laws) use to be pretty different, but they are almost the same now.  what ever you do with the faxed or mailed copy you need to do with electronic resumes, just advised one of my clients recently on this.
832052
Short answer Yes.. contact the clerk of courts... some States have a do it yourself format... you do not have to have a lawyer (u should,  have a lawyer look everything over before you submit it to the courts (about $100.00-$500.00) for them to review your completed documents in this area.\ngood luck hint use plain language no slang or easily misunderstood words (fad words). yes means yes and no means no.