What country is least likely for America to attack in the next 12 months?
403304
Canada has a lot of oil. According to all the liberals, that is the only reason Bush invaded Iraq, so it makes sense that Canada would be next. Plus it's closer to home.
619714
"It takes two to tango"... so, both really, but as for any one faction, verses any other... the US, is definately the most dangerous... where Israel comes in, is provocation, to put it simply, Israel (vs Iran), or Iran (vs the US directly) is the spark, and the US is the proverbial "powderkeg". Iran is, however, a HUGE threat to the world economy (in particular, the fragile US economy), but to be such a threat, it needs a cause to "unite" its people, that is where we (the US under republican or democrat leadership), and Israel (under virtualy any leadership), come in to play... by itself, without direct combat Iran is possably the most dangerous power on this earth (due to its economic signifigance)... but as far as direcly killing/destroying the world, and creating unecisary death, and combat, the US takes the "blue ribbon"... but never fear, if the partisan bickering continues, and socialist government systems continue to rise at there current rate (here in the US), the democrats and republicans that currently ocupy this country will colapse its economy, rendering the US relatively powerless, and making way for the evil empire of China to rise... of coarse when this happens (and it will, if we do not signifigantly change our course in the next 15-25 years, the economy will undergo another "crash", like in the nineteen thirties), China will be the biggest military threat...\n\nDoesn't make you very optomistic about the future of our world does it? I just hope this new "crash" doesn't happen within my lifetime... Even with the idiodic (not patriotic) red white and stupid general public at the relm, eventualy (hopefuly soon), we will get an inteligent president, who will guide us away from this path of self-destruction (after all, if you have enough monkeys typing on enough typewriters, for a long enough time, they may eventualy type something intelegent, right?)...
579502
1. The US will attack Iran.  -->  Military attack?  Maybe 5%.  At this point, the U.S. wants to reach a diplomatic compromise, and luckily we can rely on the intelligence and competence of Condaleeza Rice.\n2. The US will use nukes in the attack.  -->  The U.S. does not use nukes as a first strike.  0% chance.\n2. WW3 will start in a big way   -->  If war looked imminent, the UN would finally wake up out of its coma and start honoring its charter, rather than just engaging in empty rhetoric.  Until now, the UN has had the luxury of inaction because the United States always stepped into the void and did what had to be done.  However, a huge future conflict would require that the UN work feverishly to prevent a catastrophe.  1% chance\nall within the next 12 months.
1162473
1.  Israel, because they don't honor their alliances (e.g. bombing of the USS Liberty) and often act impulsively in an overly-aggressive manner.  I think they would actually use their nuclear weapons without giving it a second thought.\n\n2. North Korea, because they've proven that they don't honor any agreements and that they have no problem with being duplicitous (e.g. getting aid for not developing weapons while secretly developing weapons).  Clearly they are determined to develop nuclear weapons, but I'm not so sure they would be willing to use them.\n\n3.  The US may pose the greatest threat to North America, since they are the only country that has actually used a weapon comparable to a nuke.  They have the means, and they are clearly willing.  Will their current policies lead to their use, which presumably would be followed by a counter-attack that would decimate parts of North America?
622016
the world will not be a safer place. Other nations need US help for support. Not only in battle, but also for spying and other support. As you know, US forces are all over the globe.
985264
china... US... 2090ish.... \n\nnot sure on the winner.. depends on what happens between now and then... \n\nat the moment, U.S. is a two point favorite... the way I see it....\n\nthere is almost no chance that either\n\nA. the U.S. will completely fall out of the world view in 5 or so years\n\nB. that Russia will become that large of a player in 5 or so years... \n\nmaybe 30-50... not 5... unless there is some sort of huge depression... or nuclear incident... which would be WWIII anyway most likely...
595718
only danger at the present time is from the USA
1092262
America has not "attacked" those countries, by themselves, out of a whim.  They are backed by the United Nations and many other countries have helped in the effort to decrease terrorism.
618429
The US will only bomb.  They have no prayer of holding the country without a unified coalition of nations.  The bombing will probably take place in about another year.
345673
The USA,of course.\n\nThey want no one but themselves to have weapons of mass destruction.\nThey have absolutely no respect for other goverments from countries with different cultures.\nTheres no other country that  represents a bigger threat  to they world.
108875
Realistically, I would say China looks like a good bet. I want it to be America, but I would be lying if I said that China won't eventually surpase the US.
44495
in america's case which is to occupy and bomb countries
192063
Certainly not in near future means woith one year. However, after pulling forces from Iraq, US will try to attempt on Iran.
11470
Mexico is which country America will invade next. 10/16/06
1020271
Most likely Brazil.And though Brazil is good we are not afraid of them.we might give them the shock of their lives.
397574
No one will win, if we attack them this will give other countries another reason to hate us, especially in the middle east.
114285
1) Yes\n2) When the United States of America invades another country or when the United States of America is attacked by Terrorists or when China starts buying Gold (Currently they have just 2% of their reserves in Gold)