can any one give me the formula to E=MC`2`?
401395
Way to go Arbitrage!  Oh to funny guy- yeah we get that E=MC2  IS a formula- but if you really want to "get it" Check out Maxwells equations. It's a great time to be a science nerd with all this info pouring in now! Figure it out & go up one on Albert!
217977
f(E) = 1/(exp{(E-Ef)/kT}+1)
1166133
Multiply both sides by R+r\nI(R+r) = E\nDistribute the I\nIR + Rr = E\nSubtract IR form each side\nRr = E - IR\nDivide both sides by R\nr = (E-IR)/R
954813
Yeah, it's E=mc^2 and it relates energy and mass.  E is energy, m is mass, c is the speed of light (celeritas).  The equation could come useful in physics, like atomic physics.\n\nWhat did you wanted to know?
294096
The theoretical physics equation E = mc2 states a relationship between energy (E) and mass (m) first formulated by Albert Einstein in his 1905 paper "Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhängig?" ("Does the Inertia of a Body Depend Upon Its Energy Content?", published in Annalen der Physik on September 27), one of the articles now known as his Annus Mirabilis Papers. \n\nIn the context of special relativity theory, the implication is that energy and mass are, in some sense, equivalent. In practical terms, it led to the atomic bomb. It is one of the best-known equations of all time. Even those who may not explicitly know what it means may have some idea of its meaning through culture. Background and consequencesThe equation resulted from Albert Einstein's inquiry into the dependence of mass on its energy content. The famous result of this inquiry is that the mass of a body is actually a measure of its energy content. To understand the significance of this relationship, compare the electromagnetic force with the gravitational force. In electromagnetism, energy is contained in the fields (electric and magnetic) associated with the force and not in the charges. In gravitation, the energy is contained in the matter itself. It is not a coincidence that mass bends spacetime, while the charges of the other three fundamental forces do not. \n\nRest energy = mass X (speed of light)2\n\n\nAccording to the equation, the total amount of energy obtainable from an object is equivalent to the mass of the object multiplied by the square of the speed of light. \n\nThis equation was crucial in the development of the atomic bomb. By measuring the mass of different atomic nuclei and comparing that number with the mass of the individual protons and neutrons, one can obtain an estimate of the binding energy available within an atomic nucleus. This not only showed that it was possible to release energy by fusion of light nuclei or fission of heavy nuclei, but also to estimate the amount of energy which can be released. \n\nIt is a little known piece of trivia that Einstein originally wrote the equation in the form m = L/c² (with an "L", instead of an "E", representing energy). \n\nA kilogram of mass completely converts into \n89,875,517,873,681,764 joules or \n24,965,421,632 kilowatt-hours or \n21.48076431 megatons of TNT \napproximately 0.0851900643 Quads (quadrillion British thermal units) \n\n\nIt is important to note that practical conversions of mass to energy are seldom 100 percent efficient. One theoretically perfect conversion would result from a collision of matter and antimatter; for most cases, byproducts are produced instead of energy, and therefore very little mass is actually converted. In the equation, mass is energy, but for the sake of clarity, the word converted is used. \n\nAccording to Umberto Bartocci (University of Perugia historian of mathematics), the equation was first published two years earlier by Olinto De Pretto, an industrialist from Vicenza, Italy, though this is not generally regarded as true or important by mainstream historians. Even if De Pretto introduced the formula, it was Einstein who connected it with the theory of relativity. Applicability of the equation E=mc² applies to all objects with mass, as it is a statement that mass is energy. Its applicability to moving objects depends on the definition of mass used in the equation.
407618
k e =1/2  * m *v *v\n    =1/2 *3 * (3.5*10) * (3.5*10)\n    =0.18j (ans)
690012
the equation is as simple as the elegant and simple universe.the equation means that any type of energy can be converted into mass and vice versa. it means that at speed of light the enrgy becomes infinite(to accelerate it actually)and thus mass becomes infinite(special relativity)provided the generation of light in both the cases. the actual equation is e(kinetic energy)=mc^2/underroot(1-v^2/c^2).the e=mc^2 equation is still applicable for objects moving or stationary meaning that both the equations are true.
321969
formula is S=M+2\nS+M=5.64\n\nso 2m+2=5.64\n\n2m=3.64\n\nm=1.82
956102
Here is the equation\n\n(246,92)U ---> (4,2)He + (242,90)Th + 2Gamma
62455
Einstein's theory: e(energy)=m(mass)c(speed of light) squared so e=mc2
130040
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_%28mathematical_constant%29\nfor the significance of e and how it is used, use this link
618887
By relativity, E = Mc2\n\nIf E = 4 X 10^6 J, then....\n\n4 X 10^6 / c^2 = 4.45 X 10^ -11 kg\n\nWhere C = 299,792,458 m/s
729915
E = cp*m * ∆T; you have cp (specific heat), m and ∆T.  Find how many moles 1kg of iron is, and subsitute that for the mass in the formula for cp.  You can get that information here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron
125124
E=Mc^2 is not newtons 2nd law of motion\n\nEnergy = mass in kg * the speed of light squared which is in m/s\nThat is the full equation,it is by no means a proof but it is the equation\nNewtons 2nd law of motion is mass * acceleration,acceleration has units of m/s^2\n\nLight does not accelerate\n\nE= mc^2 is used to find how much erergy is required to create new mass,it is used a lot in particle physics
798483
Here it is:\n\n(98,42)Mo + (1,0)n ---> (99,42)Mo
1001506
Dude! all you have to do is increase the velocity!\nOr Dude! I got it! E= MC2
81056
ja :), that's a good one. E=mc^2 talks about the equivalence between matter and energy; c is just the constant that joins them both ..you won't attain a c ¨velocity¨out of it ; you'll just have to use \n E=mc^2/(sqrt(1-(v/c)^2) ( Is it Lorenz transf?) and I think Xav was pretty clear with his explanation! :)