describe 1 way the crusades separated people?
400387
The crusades seperated people because it caused people who where either looking for religous salvation or just money to leave and fight.
983387
The chapter your referring to is what should be happening all over the world today.\nThe scripture  ( Acts 10:11-48) was God's way of telling Peter ( and all concerned in this scripture ) that there is no race ( of people ) any better than the other. When God let down the sheet full of animals and reptiles and birds of every kind, He was " symbolically " telling Peter to go and " mingle " with other cultures, that nobody was any " gooder " than the other.\n And that is what I meant in my opening statement! Hope this clarifies your post.\nI have toexplain it more clearly after reading some of the answers. \nA Jew by name of Cornelius was warned by God to send for Peter. Immediately after speaking with God, Peter had some men at his door sent by Cornelius to come and get him. \n If you read further, verse 28 " And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean. "\n To simplify, Peter is saying that it is highly irregular for a Jew to associate with people of another race. He also said that God had shewed him what he was to do.\nI would suggest for all to read the whole chapter to fully comprehend what message God is portraying.
582228
when trade started to take place, people started move to cities, but what realli got feudalism to an end was the crusades. this gave the serfs a chance to join and leave their  land
479496
Red .\n As the blood of the victims of the Crusades and the Inquisition and the Conquista .
1083272
The Third Crusade (1189–1192) was an attempt by European leaders to reconquer the Holy Land from Saladin. It is sometimes referred to as the Kings' Crusade.
975001
Well I look at it this way. The christians stopped mass killings of Muslims after the last Crusade, the muslims never stopped mass killings since the Crusades.
258016
Alleluia! Praise the Lord! Glad you've seen through this, mate! The dilemma you describe is known in theology as the heresy of antinomianism (you might want to do a web search on it for the fun of it).\n\nSee the contrasting beliefs of the Eastern Orthodox, Oriental and Catholic Churches on this point.  They are far more coherent.
544599
Very much so : they were to secure the holy land and the route to Jerusalem for Christian pilgrims.          America's modern crusade is rather more to secure Palestine for the Jews.
955781
well the Crusades and the conquest of Cannan were a little different. First the Crusaders often went in to villages in Europe and kill people were their was no enemy or army to fight. The Israelites fought wars against army's and fortifications. \n\nas for the 40 years no they were not walking around the Sinai dessert for 40 years. Most of the time they were camped in one spot. Read up about the spy debacle that will explain why they were their so long. \n\nAs for the killing we really dont know how much blood shead their was from the Israelite battles. If you notice Their is almost never a record of any Israelites dieing yet all the Canaanites they attacked did die? History tends to be written by the victor this is no different.
21933
A Christian military order from the Crusades. Their original job was to guard Solomon's temple in Jerusalem. They made tons of loot and were eventually accused of devil worship and suppressed by the King of France and the Pope. Their stuff passed to the Hospitalers.\n\nSome think the Templars survived, and still guard the Holy Grail. For more, read Umberto Eco's book "Foucault's Pendulum".
463677
some of them were but several of the Crusades were unsuccessful
1224
Wikipedia is awesome.\n\n"In the 1st century, Zealots conducted a fierce and unrelenting terror campaign against the Roman occupiers of the eastern Mediterranean. The Zealots enlisted sicarii to strike down rich Jewish collaborators and others who were friendly to the Romans."
175876
All of them.\n\nBut more specifically it was much of the Iberian peninsula that is actually conquered by Arab and Berber Muslims, this starts almost eight centuries of Muslim presence there. Gaul (present day france) was also threatened\n\nChristianity and Europe were well into the Dark Ages (complete socio-economic collapse resulting in loss of technology and most centrelized government.) The Roman Empire was gone and many of the barbarian tribes that had moved into lands formerly held by the Romans were technologically inferior to the large religiously unifed forces of the Berbers.  \n\nA ruler named Charlemange who you may want to look up was responsible for unifying a relativly large area of Christian europe and halting the muslim advance.
578274
Christianity by far.  It has the bloodiest history.  Since the creation of Christianity they have been trying to dominate every aspect of religious life around the globe.  ANd violence has been a part of their tactic since the begining.  it cannot be denied its a fact.
534953
They were the Cathars (correct spelling will help you search Wikipedia - I won't do that for you).  They were a heretic sect of Christianiity that became extrremeely popular in southern France.   They  suffered greatly at the hands of the Inquisition, and were finally supprressed brutally in the Albigensian Crusade.
528482
The best place to get the truth about the crusades is in a book called "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades).  Check your local library.  \n\nOf course, if you are doing a paper for a very liberal teacher, he/she may not want the truth and give you a poor grade in revenge.  So be careful.  Also, go to the following site, for more:  \n\nhttp://www.cbn.com/spirituallife/churchandministry/churchhistory/crusades_gotquestions.asp
1040923
Before Christ there no Christians. The people were Jews, pagans and various Abrahamic based religions