what was Sejanus' crime?
403268
Strabo's right! \n--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n \n Author: * Josephia Flavius - 78 Posts on this thread out of 696 Posts sitewide. \nDate: Jun 27, 2002 - 21:46 \n\nTwas Sejanus whose crime was to aspire to the hand of Claudia Livilla, Germanicus' sister and widow of Tiberius' son Drusus, in the hope of ruling as regent and guardian of Drus's son Tiberius Gemellus (born AD 19) once Tiberius was gone. Tiberias was in his seventies with no heir apparent but very wary, the swift and utter ruin of Sejanus, his asscoiates and children ushered in the reign of terror of Tiberius' latter years.
374571
http://www.cityrating.com/citycrime.asp?city=Kansas+City&state=MO
1053824
rape.. and hate crimes.\n\nvictim? id theft... i have bed credit
1033645
Folks are kind of missing that it wasn't a voluntary act.  If he did it himself then yes he is guilty of public indecency, if he had it done to him then he was actually a victim in the eyes of the law.\n\nWhether he would get a drunk and incapable/disorderly charge is another thing.
493144
Try crime library, it's got several stories on him.  Here's the link:
268830
"Lord of the" is right, Julies Ceasar was assasinated. Read more here:\n\nhttp://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/caesar2.htm
939823
1) Habeus Corpus\n2) damages\n3) conspiracy
27269
I don't know if he murdered someone in his family, but this site has some interesting information.  I have not yet determined its accuracy,\nhttp://www.reformation.org/columbus-unmasked.html
725780
Possessed by demons? Often an accusation levied against people who do not fit societies current specification for optimum citizen.\nThose that actually commit crime should be judged as any others by the legal system. Let us end the insane insanity excuse for evading responsibility for crime.
651302
Have you been a hermit over the years?\n\nMJ's dad was robbed and murdered YEARS ago.The two murderers(2 young men)later confessed they knew nothing about who they killed,nor did they know it was MJ's dad.
745068
He was proved innocent in a court of law.  Why would you hang and innocent person.\n\nCoach
85851
While I did not live during those times to be able to say how they addressed each particular crime, I could only provide what I 'think' they may have done based on literary works and plays that were handed down from those times.\n\nOne means of punishment was "the stocks", where a person was confined so that they could be seen (and perhaps) ridiculed by others.  From literature, such as "The Scarlett Letter", it appears that the puritans, who have put people to death for crimes they considered extremely severe (in order to root out evil, as it seems to me), appeared to be more inclined to find a way to publically ridicule the people that committed lesser infractions.  Sometimes they 'branded' people or made them somehow identifiable as persons who did not follow a strict "moral" code.\n\nWhile they seemed to be their own "jury of their peers", they probably didn't have the best means of punishment, espeically in cases where those doling such out were very superstitious.
540166
The crime is escape from lawful custody.  At the time of the escape the custody was due to the conviction, and was lawful.  The offence has been committed.
572711
OK, he was a reservist, therefore I'm guessing it's accurate to say he commited the crimes off-base and while not on active or reserve duty. \nIf he was not on military time, the military won't do anything, unless it's proved it happened on base in exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction and the statute of limitation has not run out. The military will only prosecute via UCMJ, if he was on duty at the time. If he's getting paid, at that minute, he's on duty. Retirees are subjest to the UCMJ, for severe offenses because they receive military retirement pay, but are no longer in the military. If he was on civilian staus at the time of the offense, on base, the local federal magistrate would be used.  \nIf the crimes happened while he was on civilian status the locals have first dibs, if they do not proceed the military has the option to, again...if he was on military status. If the state prosecutor did not proceed w/ the case, I doubt the military would or even can do anything. \nIf you need more info try to contact a local base and ask for their base legal office and or JAG office. \n\nAlso, there is no remorse or protection for molesters in the military, they usually get max punishments and not much of a chance for parole. They also do the hardest time in Leavenworth.
821045
Hey Del the yanks are answering,a guy is innocent till proven guilty,we are supposed to have human rights,obviously we havent got the the right to walk into town,the poor guy went to jail for that.These knobs should think of the family of the man.At the end of it all he was in jail coz they only thought he was a bad person.God bless him and his family
1003041
Lots of money a half ass alibi and a helluva lot of political power. \nAll for the one time price of selling ones soul
566442
Is he guilty?  If he's still in jail from 1979 - it must have been pretty heinous.  I vote you leave him there until he's finished serving his time.