Why is “I am looking forward to see you” wrong grammatically? Specify the rule please?
410284
The -ing form is called the progressive and is mainly used to describe on going events.  In this usage the form is the future progressive, which is used to describe an on going event which has not yet started (if that makes any sense).  When you see that person, you will continue to see them (at least for some period of time).  Usually in English future events are referred to in -ing unless followed by "will" or "going to".  \n\nI will see you\nI'm going to see you.\n\nIf going to is follow by "be", then the next verb will end in -ing\n\nI'm going to be seeing you\n\nAs far as I know, any time you are using the "looking foward to" phrase, the next verb will always end in -ing, because you are looking foward to doing that event for a period of time or repeatedly, not just one time then done with it.
125842
Because they cannot form a complete sentence by themselves. "I going to store" just doesn't make sense. It doesn't have all of the information about tense, mood, person, etc. that a sentence proper needs. Is it "I am going" or "I was going"? A verb is finite if it can stand on its own in a sentence with no other verbs. The verb phrase "am going" IS finite.
1182438
This is fine as it is. The few grammatical mistakes that there are just aren't worth correcting.\nGood job, and good luck on your speech!
1004580
This doesn't really make any sense to me.\nHere are those words in sentences.\nI had it.\nWe went to see it.\nIf we go to it you will see it.
1072926
The statement number 1 is grammatically correct.\n(Other answerers - To be grammatically correct, a sentence should not be meaningful -- Consider this: I saw some cars flying near the bottom of the Pacific Ocean when I was eating iron sheets)
947400
I agree with byzantino's answer: "May God be with you" is correct but in Spanish we also use it like "Godspeed" ( good fortune; success (used as a wish to a person starting on a journey, a new venture, etc.).
1010622
Alright- let's say that someone has just given you directions, and they ask you if you have understood what they have said, you could reply either "yes, I understood" or "yes, I understand" - I believe the reason for this is because the info was presented to you already (past tense) but you are being asked whether you understand it now, therefore you can also answer in the present tense, "I understand"- if you are referring to understanding the info at the time it was presented to you, you can use the past tense "I understood".\nGet or got- getting something is considered "future tense"-ie" I get paid on Friday", " I am going to get a haircut"- "got" is considered present tense ie "I have got a ton of homework", "Do you see what I've got?". Hopefully this makes sense...you're doing well- keep up the good work.
1064981
'Go' carries an element of meaning of 'away from the place the speaker is now in'.\n\n'Come' carries an element of meaning of 'towards the place the speaker is now in.'\n\nTherefore 'I'm coming with you' focuses on the togetherness and the presumed simultaneous arrival of the two people at a shared place.\n\n'I'm going with you' focuses on the departure together towards a distant destination.  The difference is quite subtle but could be important.\n\nThere are similar elements of meaning in the verbs 'bring' v. 'take' - though more marked.
54571
No.  It should read, "Please go to the concert with Tammy and me."\n\nIf you remove "Tammy and" from the sentence, it should  still make sense.  You wouldn't say, "Please go to the concert with I."\n\nYou could say, "Tammy and I would like you to go to the concert with us."  Again, if you remove "Tammy and" from the sentence, it still makes sense.\n\nThe rule: Use "me" when you're the object, and "I" when you're the subject.
1158726
however, not all native English speakers write or speak grammatically correct.\n\ni spot an error that could be overlooked by many in your sentence. "........., the first thing they usually mention is.."\n\nwould be better if "...........the first thing they usually mention has.."
213059
"Hasta la vista" means, colloquially, "See you later!".  The literal translation is "until the seeing", which of course makes no sense in English.
36610
'I am hungry \nEats your hand \nKeeps the other for tomorrow \nAnd your head \nFor the days of party.'\n\nYes, this doesn't make much sense in that order, but different languages use words in different orders than other languages.
376986
Looking forward to that day, are you?
161155
It's a cultural thing. The Korean language doesn't have the same inflections as say, English, so "What are you doing here?" comes across in the same tone of voice as "Nice to see you." Unless they're smiling at you, it can be hard to realize that they may not mean to come across as unfriendly. They also don't have the same concept of personal space, so they will stand right next to someone without meaning to be agressive.
520915
its just a turn of phrase now but I assume comes from the use of the conditional tense- I would do something conditional on something else happening. \nSo I would like to thank you (written in a card) may mean I would like to do it in person but I cannot.\nso its written as a replacement for face to face contact.  \nalso it may be that someone is offering their thanks in advance- I would like to thank you for your help ( if I receive it)
9596
When you speak to another about a current emotion, John IS upset. \n2)To BE somewhere is correct and after you left, you have BEEN there. \n3)Should is a desire unfulfilled and shall is an action about to be done. "I should do this" Means, the desire is there, not necessarily the actions behind it. "I shall do this" is speaking of an act about to tak place. 4)Must and Have to are used the same way, however, MUST is more proper. (Going and gonna mean the same but going is more proper)\n5) go to www.google.com there search for adjective listings, it will help to know them. \n6)the quote about the company picnic is corect, it is a formal way of saying "Aww, we are going to miss you, friend"\n7)Yes, that quote is granmmatically correct. \nThe English language is tough to learn, and it is full of double standards and screwy rules, but hang in there, it will be worth it.
771036
I'm going to be busy preparing [myself] for the wedding = Voy a estar muy ocupado preparándome para la boda\n\nor\n\nI'm going to be busy preparing for the wedding = Voy a estar muy ocupado preparando para la boda