How come most European countries are multiracial but Asian countries are not?
408748
asia is multi racial. singapore for example is home to malay, chinese and indi. i doubt if asia will be "globally-multi racial" in the future.
263936
I've studied in 3 countries : Malaysia, Singapore & Australia, and all of them are multi-cultural, multi-ethnic countries with many different races within a single University campus and city. \nNeedless to say, most of my friends aren't even of my own race or country: :)\nRespectively:\nSaudi Arabia, U.A.E, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, China (including Taiwan), U.K, Singapore, Malaysia, Denmark, Indonesia, Australia, Iran, Palestine & Israel, Cyprus, Sri Lanka, Hong Kong & New Zealand.\nAnd yes, I'm still very much in contact with all of them, most of whom which I meet everyday!
953951
Asian is a broad term....NO
867877
I am from China...I can read your message because we also have internet access(I wonder how you think of Chinese,uncivilized?)\n\nEuropeans used to be weak ethnic groups. Unfortunately, hundreds years ago,europea became very strong because of social and scientific revolution.And China only stayed here. The result is the invasion from European countries.\nAnd now,Europeans are  comparatively rich and stable than most other countries. Some of them are ignorant,arrogant and racial.Some appear to be friendly. \nUnlike the north America,the cultures in europea are highly diverse.  We can't generalize something to all Europeans. Europeans people seem to cherish their own culture.
662695
You are right. It can be an extension of Asia because there is no real delineation between Asia and Europe, like Africa, Americas and Australia. We can as well call it Eurasia. Whaddya say?
643528
maybe so they can meet a nice asian girl?  I don't agree with why they don't get replies though.  Asian euro is asians wanting Europeans, to which many a black man is.  If you would like I would suggest telling them to check out the site below, or the many like it.
752599
I'm assuming that the company that puts out the applications just thinks Arabs will choose Asian, as the middle east is technically on the Asian continent.  I think it should be separate though.  Most people think of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, etc. when they think of Asian, and the culture in the middle east is much different from the that of the  aforementioned countries.  Although as I've said before, it's just for statistical purposes.  I've put Alaskan Native before and no one said anything. lol
1059537
Nope not all Asians.......The mongolians have it and mostly south east Asians have it....85% of people in India don't have it.....I guess Indians and pakistanis don't have small eyes except people that live near the boarders (migrators from other countries). And exceptions always there, but rest of the Asians they have small eyes (90% of it).
1046658
French colonies in Africa. \nNo, Europeans aren't supposed to be Caucasian. I don't know where you heard that from?
147795
Not all white girls look better than asians, same applies vice versa. It all depends on the individuals you're comparing! Furthermore, even if you're comparing 2 equally beautiful girls, there won't be any conclusion. Both would be beautiful in their own ways.
506838
its just because your skin. but there are more states and countries that treat equal opportunity to white, yellow, gold, green and black people, dig?
814250
Both have large Asian populations.
909409
well that's a good question.as u yrself hv mentioned,the country is SO BIG.well that's the hint.russia is a MULTIRACIAL country.in the russian lang itself there hav been two dif terms:Русский-Русская [russkiy-russkaya] (a man and a woman who belong to Russian {european} ethnic and Российский-Российская [rossiyskiy-rossiyskaya] (a man and woman of the/who live in the Russian Federation.he/she might be a Russian or not).according to wikipedia: As of the Russian Census (2002), 79.8% of the population is ethnically Russian, 3.8% Tatar, 2% Ukrainian, 1.2% Bashkir, 1.1% Chuvash, 0.9% Chechen, 0.8% Armenian. The remaining 10.3% includes those who did not specify their ethnicity as well as (in alphabetical order) Assyrians, Avars, Azeris, Belarusians, Bulgarians, Buryats, Chinese, Cossacks, Estonians, Evenks, Finns, Georgians, Germans, Greeks, Ingushes, Inuit, Jews, Kalmyks, Karelians, Kazakhs, Koreans, Kyrgyz, Lithuanians, Latvians, Maris, Mongolians, Mordvins, Nenetses, Ossetians, Poles, Romanians, Tajiks, Tuvans, Turkmen, Udmurts, Uzbeks, Yakuts, and others. Nearly all of these groups live compactly in their respective regions; Russians are the only people significantly represented in every region of the country.to be short russians represent the european race of the russian federation.just look at them:blonde hair,blue eyes etc....
1098363
For starters, and this is an incomplete answer, but the Eurocentric perspective does not see Europe as a western peninsula of Asia, but actually as its own continent.  Europe is it's own continent according to the Eurocentric perspective.  \n\nBasing its world-view on Platonic essentialism, there is something "European" about Europe and its peoples, animals, climate, etc, so that there must be something "Asian" about Asia's people, animals, climate, etc.\n\nActually, it's all pretty much the same.  Europeans are really Asians, but at around 1450, they were the most backwards region of the planet--they were the furthest from the great Asian empires of the time.  So they had to rally around their religion, Christianity, and become "superior" by virtue of their belief in Christ.\n\nLater, they believed themselves superior because of their race, intellect, rationality, peaceful nature--all the stuff that makes them see themselves as the pinnacle of humanity.\n\nAsians see Europeans as pink, hairy barbarians.  OK, maybe I'm overgeneralizing a bit, but Asians see themselves as a more ancient people, and not really "asians" at all.  There are Chinese, Koreans, Thai, Indians, Sikh, Japanese, Khmer, Pilipino (no "h"), Samoan, etc., each with a vast (if untold) history.  Each radically different from each other as German is to French, but still having religious and cultural roots.\n\nSo, where did the term come from?  From Europeans, of course.\nIn the Platonic world view, rocks are rocks because of their "rockness."  In the Socratic worldview, rocks are rocks because of their relationship to papers and scissors, for example, because of their connections to other things.\n\nNot all rocks are the same or course.  Diamonds are much more expensive compared to ordinary pebbles, but not because of their "diamondness," (the Platonic/essentialist view) but rather because it's related to market demand, war in the Congo, sellers and resellers each trying to make a buck, TV commercials, weddings and so on (the Socratic-Hegelian/dialectical worldview).\n\nSo it goes that Asians are Asians, but this really doesn't make us understand Asians, but makes an easy definition to "Europeans" and around 1450 and the coming rise of Europe, the Europeans needed to figure things out the quick and easy way.  They were going from bottom of the barrel in civilization, to masters of the universe, for good and bad.\n\nSo if you see the world from an essentialist perspective, then Europe (or Asia) is the center of the world, and everything else revolves around it.  If you see the world from the dialectical perspective, then you see the world as related to each other.  Europe would not be Europe without Asia, and vice-versa.  Each needs the other, the way diamonds need middlemen to become valuable.\n\nWhen it comes to economic integration, IJapan, India and China, to a certain degree are fostering cooperation over competition, because of the need to compete with Europe over markets and create new markets.  In other words, if India and China do good with each other, Chinese people will buy Indian products rather than European products.  This fosters an Asia-first perspective.\n\nTo read more--a tough but good read, read "The Myth of Continents" by Martin W. Lewis and Karen Wigen.
823707
you can't say that either one is better.. that would be ignorant.. but understandable if you are one of those two races.. because people are always trying to represent.  But both are of Asian decent..  they kinda look similar,, but defiantly not the same... with different cultures and basically they are just different... its like comparing Mexicans and Puerto Ricans
747319
Same reason that asians generally have super straight hair or caucasions generally have thin hair. We are all different on the outside, but that's what makes us great. \nI am African American and I am very proud of my hair. I wear it natural most of the time.\nWe should all be proud with whatever we were born with and stop trying to all look the same.
758192
There is no such thing as race. There was a study done on human DNA, within the last ten years anyway, typing and comparing the DNA of people of many different "racial" backgrounds. Of course all the Asians expected to be genetically closer to Asians than anyone else, but it actually turned out that one Asian girl was closest genetically to her black male classmate. We are really very much alike under our skin.\nHumans are the closest to each other genetically. It's amazing. There can be as little as one nucleotide difference that distinguishes your DNA from mine.\nYou're totally right. People is people.