"I think we should just blow up USA what do ya'll think?"?
415030
I think that although the U.S is highly corrupt, that we shouldn't blow it up, nor should we attempt to blow up any country - it would not only spread a high amount of radiation, but it would also alarm the countries allies - and surrounding countries. \n\nI think that the entire 9/11 deal spread vast amounts of racism towards Iranian and Iraqi people who've never done a wrong in their life. Americans shouldn't fear people from Iraq or Iran, but we should fear the Al-Quida, which is supposedly the group responsible for the "attacks" of 9/11. \n\nI that most people aren't as accepting as they say, and look poorly upon other racest, such as Mexicans, Peurtoricans, Brazillians, because my school is highly racist towards those groups. :( \n\nAmerica is by no means a "clean" country, it's highly corrupt - as is any country, we just got the butt end of corruption. People take matters, such as "blowing up" an entire country too lightly.. to obliderate an entire country, would be not only sickly wrong, but it would be out of despise..\n\nFuck our country and it's media polluted youth. :[
231660
TO crazyjimsmith: "Well lets see, the country will crumble into disarray. There will be more killing." -- um yeah, there is usually turmoil when someone invades you and dacapitates your government.  You americans don't undersdand anything about world. Most Americans have never been outside the US.  I was astonished when i found out...  Your point of view is from your couch through fox news.\n\n"Sharia law will be introduced so women will lose all their rights." - will it? how do you know? Is that the same knowledge that got US in Iraq in the first place? If sharia will be introduced, can't you see? It is part of their culture. Americans can never accept anything or anyone different, only because you do not understand it. When Iraqis are ready they will revolt. When you invade, all things aside, their first priority is to get rid of you.\n\n"Democracy will be destroyed, there will be a flood of refugees because people will flee the country." -- Democracy will be destroyed? Is there a democracy there now? Or is there a puppet government established by the United States.  Do you think most Iraqis wish to be occupied? Of course not, therefore they will not want a government that is cooperating with the United States.\n\n"Iran (Iraq's neighbour)" <-- the dumb audience needed a clarification that Iran is somewhere in middle east as well.\n\n"... will try to exert even more influence, as they are already meddling in Iraq's affairs. There will be mass killings." -- Okay there will be mass killing? because Iran will be meddling in Iraq's affairs, right? Oh wait... what is the United States meddling in again? But of couse "we" can meddle but we can't let "them" meddle because there a going to be mass killings...\n\n"Will the United Nations help? The United Nations cannot be relied on to organise a tea party. Have a look at what the UN did in Yugoslavia and East Timor" -- I'm looking and i'm liking much more that what i'm seeing on the news everyday.\n\n"You're a school student and you have to do this for home work don't you? How did I know?" <-- oh man, oh man that a was a tough one.  I'm sure noone else could have guessed that one\n\n"Because your teacher is an imbecile" <-- chances are... but so are you.\n\nTo the Questioner:\nThere are some benefits from withdrawing troops from Iraq. There are downsides as well. There will be civil war when troops withdraw. However, troops are only a timer for that conflict. Administration's policy is to build a Iraqi force to keep order, but when Americans withdraw this force will be loyal to their clan not to Iraq. Iraq is not a nation, it's a country, but it's not a nation. It's a country that Brits and French put together on a map, and that Saddam held together by terror.  Now the benefits would be:\n1. troop safety\n2. more volunteers for the military\n3. stop having a reason for the world to hate the US\n4. National Guard could be used for guarding the nation's borders (national guard -- guarding the nation see the relationship there?)\n5. Quit speding money that you don't have for god sakes. Debt what debt? here's my other credit card!\n6. Focus attention on things that need to be done at home\nand so on and so on
676706
blow it up with dynamite?
820595
No, why you silly Arab....we need to blow up Iran next.
862032
put all terrorists into room 101 with bush and Blair and fill room\n101 with oil right to the top.Drown them all in the black gold\nthey are fighting for.B@stards all of them.
661891
I think we're headed for another explosion (a war, if you will) because people need to purge their anger ever so often and war seems to be the only way they know to do it.  Things get awry in the world and it takes that purging to get rid of it.\n\nJust look at all that's going on.  We in the US are very angry and upset about the illegals, Mexico isn't doing anything to help, just the opposite from what I've heard, Iran is demanding nuclear arms, the US is saying huh-uh, Russia and China are ready to side with Iran, we've invaded Iraq, rightly or wrongly, everyone is mad at us for that, we're losing our freedoms, have the equivalent of Brown Shirts (Homeland Security), everyone is afraid of terrorists (what has really happened here since 9/11 to make us fear that?) we're talking about constructing a WALL!?!?!? between the US and Mexico.  The world has gone INSANE.
760665
yea  you tell how it is ! personally i think we should nuke the french
204772
Of course... Maybe the US should invade Canada so we can end that issue.
84425
Sink it! USA USA USA I like the way you think. We should have blown it up in 1968.
919481
First off, I strongly disagree with the person right above me, but respectfully so. I just don't think it's possible that a wack country could get enough weapons to "destroy" earth. And we wouldn't need to destroy the earth to respond. I just think that is an unlikely scenario. Will nukes be lit off in our time? Probably, but I don't think it will destroy the world.\n\nHowever, regarding your specific item, your prof is right that the United States is destroying itself. Here are my points:\n\n* Dysfunctional families. 50% divorce rates, parents working two jobs, single parents, teen parents (on the rise). Through our history we have relied on a solid social foundation, where families were expected to raise kids right. That doesn't happen now, and once you start sliding, it is near impossible to stop. On this point, I see the reasoning behind diehard conservatives and their hate for liberals. Well, I am a liberal (so to speak), but I am a firm believer in a solid family, with children being dealt with strictly as needed (not beat, but made to know the rights and wrongs).\n\n* Media onslaught. Gets worse and worse. MTV, television in general. I don't even like taking my kids to supposed "G-rated" movies anymore. Pop culture, or whatever you call it, is slowly destroying our traditional culture. And with kids and too much free time, video games, internet, and tv really are doing some damage.\n\n* Educational issues. In this day and age, it is impossible to "leave no child behind". Our schools should be geared to handle the upper level kids, college bound kids. Riff-raff that are there for fun and games should have a half-day school, and job corps the other half to get real life skills. Our college-bound learners are being brought down by an increasing number of riff-raff kids.\n\n* Economical issues. Because of educational issues, and greed on the profit margin, companies are outsourcing white-collar jobs to India and China, where better educated people will work for less pay.\n\nThere is more. I think your prof is right in a way. We are losing our edge.
225565
Nuke them.  its the only way to get their attention.  I am sick of the USA having to abide by these weak azz UN laws when we are the super power, HOW ABOUT WE ACT LIKE IT.
1076775
Lemme capture this for you. The towers got run-into by some ragheads flying planes fulla peeps that didn't wanna die. Country goes ape. USA bombs tha crap outta Tora Bora in Afghanistan and then we talk smack about Pakistan but then they say ok an try to help us.\n\nThen we ran outta stuff to blow up and the economy needed a boost and Iraq is right there so Bush says they have WMD's and the sheep say yes so we go down there and kick NATO out and our inspector says fuckit so Saddam must now have WMDs so to Iraq we go and blow stuff up and take things like oil to offset war costs and Cheney's old company Haliburton gets like $15.00 for a $2.50 MRE and $9.00 for a napkin and now Americans are mad because they found out Bush lied but the white house likes to spread blame so nothing will happen hey let's go bomb North Korea oh no wait they have real WMD's we'll pass on that.
1022890
It'd be an almost impossible task, maybe they could take over a small part-like Hawaii, or Alaska (again Herculean), well and the US has weapons of Mass Destruction and are not denying them, rather using that leverage to control the world.\n\nIn case of such an eventuality happening, that particular invading country is gonna have the whole world after it's as.s, and will have to run, that is assuming that the local Americans don't start using their arsenal of weapons that their gun laws permit them to own, the other country is gonna get their as.sholes pasted on the wall\n\nA note to end - I am not an American and I am not from that fairy Blair's country, and have always been critical of US  in most of my posts pertaining to them. The vulgar expressions (they are a part of most humans' bodies though) are meant not as an insult but to explain, to stress that under the present circumstances what you are asking is practically impossible.\nChill out!\nst
554492
Not NO, but HELL NO!!\n\n""We never learn, do we?" he asked. My quizzical look made him chuckle, and he continued as he turned back toward the Wall: "It never ceases to amaze me what we let ourselves be turned into cannon fodder for. We let ourselves get talked into all sorts of horror, and only after the body bags start piling up do we begin to wonder why."\n\nWe both knew he had my attention now. "Know how many names are here?" he asked. "Something like 50,000," I replied. "You make it sound like a goddamn statistic" he said, "There's Fifty Eight Thousand Two Hundred And Twenty Nine names on this Wall." He said the words slowly, enunciating each one.\n\n"Fifty Eight Thousand Two Hundred And Twenty Nine. Every one of them a son; a brother, or a father, a husband, a cousin, a lover, a neighbor, a friend. Fifty Eight Thousand Two Hundred And Twenty Nine boys brought home in boxes. For what? For fuckin' nothing. And now the bastards are gonna do it again."\n\n"You mean Iraq ?" I asked. "That isn't gonna be for nothing. Saddam is dangerous, he has to be stopped."\n\nThe man could barely conceal his contempt. "Give me a break. A danger to who? Us here in the U.S. of A.? Is his navy off our coast? Is his air force flying over our cities? The only danger he poses is to his neighbors, maybe, and they're so worried about it that they're willing to let us die for them, but won't fight him themselves. And they want us to pay them for the privilege. With friends like that...." His voice trailed off. "Maybe you're right," he finally said, "this isn't for nothing. It's for oil."\n\nMy raised eyebrows made him shake his head, and he went on: "I don't know what's worse. Killing people over political philosophy, like in my time, or for oil. Hey, at least this time we might get something for our blood. Like ol' Tecumseh Sherman said, 'Nations go to war when there is something to be got by it'. Now oil can be got by it. After a great start, we're gonna be no different than any other empire that came down the historical pike.\n\n"And I know what you're gonna say next. 'He sponsors terrorism'. Where's the proof? I thought we were going after bin Laden for that. But wait, Afghanistan ain't got any oil. So we need another monster, who's got something worth taking. And Saddam is so damn convenient. Yeah, he's an evil sonovabitch who deserves to be taken out, but are we the ones who should do it? Are our kids the ones who should die for it? Is he worth another Wall like this?\n\n"And what the hell is terrorism, anyway? It's not a thing; it's not a place; it's not a person. It is a political and military strategy, that's all. Having a 'War On Terrorism' is as ridiculous as having a 'War on Flanking Maneuvers'. You'll end terrorism when there's no longer anything for anybody to get pissed off about."\n\n"As for now, maybe if we looked at why people are pissed at us, we'd begin to understand. Hell, it doesn't matter whether they're right or wrong; it's what they perceive that motivates them. What you have to address is why they perceive things as they do. Only then will you start to get a clue. And spare me the bullshit about them hating us because of our freedom. We haven't been truly free in a long time. And now we're letting all this demagoguery convince us to give up what little liberty we have left. Big Brother Lives!"\n\nCol. David H. Hackworth Or "Hack"\n\nEight Purple Hearts. Ten Silver Stars. Twice awarded the Distinguished Service Cross. And now a virtual shoe-in for the Medal of Honor. You name the honor, Colonel David Hackworth got it.\n\nSaddam killed millions? prove it. We killed 500,000 children under 5 with our blockaids, and
220881
I would set roadside bombs and kill everybody Americans and Iraqi's. What is the sense in that, Iraqi's are killing themselves more than we are killing them.
556175
No, revolutions only bring mayhem and ruin. How about getting rid of Mexico by uniting it with Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador and (just for the hell of it) Arizona. It could be called Mexsaldurna! New Mexico could just be Mexico. While we're at it, why not divide North Dakota into Northern Dakota, Northernmost Dakota and The Useless Patch of Land between Northernmost Dakota and Canada. And get rid of upper Michigan. Give it to Canada so we could take that New Brunswick. Next, divide the Carolinas into 23 states, each named Carolina, with minor spelling changes. Also, while I have your attention, we should erase Rhode Island. I don't mean annex it to Massachusetts, I mean erase it. Take a pencil to it, and make a big white space with nothing in it. And do something about Colorado and Wyoming! They look exactly alike in maps, and a square is such a boring shape. Make Wyoming into a triangle, and Colorado into a complex myriagon. Then unify Kansas and Nebraska to form Kanraska, and only let stupid white corn-huskers live there. And, if I could venture out of America for a sec, lets do away with all of these Soviet countries. There are fifteen, but their all so useless, why not make them into four? Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan? Who needs em? Moldova? Make that, new Romania! Now... what were we talking about?
1054160
I'd have no problem letting the turd-world wipe themselves out.  But if they attack us, they'll get the stomping of their lives.\n\nCase in point.