Why hasn't Bush challenged Scooter's statement yet?
403614
He probably is guilty as charged. I would hate to be in scooters shoes. Bush will be out to get him now. But the truth is cleansing.
287138
Bushy is no Christian.  Bushy is the diabolical reincarnation of the devil.  He is still in disiguise until he takes full military control of the country.  Anything he says about Christianity should not be taken at face value.\n\nAgain and again, George W. Bush has challenged the people of America and the world to choose between principle and following his tempting lead.\n\nHe makes plain that he will do horrible, amoral things, such as roll back environmental regulations, which will - according to reports by people called scientists by most, evil intellectuals by George W. Bush - cause 18,000 people a year to die prematurely. In return, he promised to put some money in people’s pockets via tax cuts.\n\nLead me not into temptation, but deliver me from evil.\n\nGeorge W. Bush made clear he wanted us to go without our allies into Iraq – even if he occasionally lied and said otherwise. He never hid the fact that he wanted the booty of oil and rebuilding contracts all to himself – and for those who were willing to follow him. Yes, more Americans would lose their lives if we went in without our allies. Yes, there was a greater risk of the mission being unsuccessful. Yes, the grounds for undertaking the mission were tenuous at best to begin with. But he promised the mission would be easy money, people giving us flowers and the second largest oil reserves on the planet. And so people supported his alliance-destroying hatred and arrogance.\n\nLead me not into temptation, but deliver me from evil.\n\nGeorge W. Bush sent out a call to the leaders of the world: either you are with me or you are against me. I am undertaking a mission you are being told is unjustified by those who are best in position to know – the UN weapons inspectors – he told the world’s leaders plainly. I am going to undertake this mission, regardless of what facts and evidence tell me, and anyone who comes along will get to share the booty; anyone who does not will miss out on millions and millions of dollars. Give me your sons lives, he told the world’s leaders, ignore the will of your people, and I will give your wealth beyond your wildest dreams and fame and popularity like you never imagined. Most leaders stood strong against the siren song, some did not.\n\nLead me not into temptation, but deliver me from evil.\n\nGeorge W. Bush had already depleted the nation’s coffers, having promised to line the pockets of those who had followed him with hordes of cash and bounteous jobs. The hordes and jobs never came. Then, he said to the people again, I will rob the coffers a second time. Support me, and I will line your pockets – I will give you $400 a head for your young ones. Let me line the pockets of the rich once again, leaving the nation in bankrupted tatters, and I will give your real wealth this time – not like the lies and empty promises I gave you before. Follow me into this temptation just one more time, and you will see. Empty the nation’s coffers with me, and I will make you rich. And again people gave their support to George W. Bush.\n\nI could keep rambling on and on but I think you get the point.
47347
Actually, tough as this might be to accept there are a number of reasons...\n\n- It has not been proven that he lied\n- It has not been proven that he broke any laws\n\nContrary to conspiracy theories, a republican led congress cannot prevent an impeachment if either of the above occur, or prevent an investigation or judicial hearing should the democrats push for one.\n\nReality, take a deep breath and try to take this in, as we can assume the democrats would drive for this the second they felt they could, it is a fairly safe assumption that President Bush has done nothing that would warrant his impeachment.\n\nSorry to burst your bubble...
1147613
What do you mean, "why won't republicans see we need progress?"?!?  How can you say that?  What do you think President Bush is seeking in Iraq and Afghanistan?  He's seeking progress for the people there that have been under harsh oppression for so long.  What do you think he is doing in raising security for our nation?  He's making it easier for the "independent minds" of America to make their own progress (we are capable of making progress without the government's supervision at every step) without fear of terrorist attacks on centers of economic progress (The World Trade Center).  You are simply wrong in saying that Republicans don't see that we need progress.  Perhaps if the Democrats would see that progress in areas other than their own is still progress, they would stop accuse the Republicans of squandering resources on unneeded action.
167057
Bush isn't selling the ports ... they already belong to a British company that is selling them to a company from the UAE.\n\nAnd US always has and will continue to be responsible for security at the ports, regardless of what company owns them
661678
Liberal scum??? Whiney Liberal??? Hmmmmmmmmmm, I'm guessing some of these fools will still be included as Dubya supporters when his approval rating hits 1% in 2008. My guess however is that, sadly, Dubya's worst times are ahead of him. There are big revelations about his presidency yet to be revealed. The Scooter Libey trial has only begun. And God knows Dubya will continue to consistantly screw up the world in the next few long years. But hey! What do we know. We're just liberal scum am I right?!   George Dubya, Still Fightin the Good Fight!
772902
The President said today that he decided to replace Don a week ago but continued to claim to support him so as not to influence the outcome of the elections.\n\nThis was both a lie (lying to the public) and a major blunder on Bush's side. If he had canned Rummy a week before the elections Republicans might have been able to save some of the seats they lost yesterday.
304861
Well George Jr. and Dick discussed the CIA report in my home. Dick wanted the contract to rebuild the pipeline. We won't be in the White House forever. Scooter was supposed to keep this information to himself.
556403
Bush doesn't even know what the word IS means\n\nso there is no way that he is multiplicty in one
401547
Not soon enough.\n\nActually I may be wrong about that. Can you say "President Cheney" without choking? Me either.\n\nOkay, let's say we impeach them both, and both are removed. Hey, a man can dream, can't he? Whups! Can you say "President Hastert"? BAD DREAM! BAD, BAD, BAD DREAM!!\n\nI think I would rather wait until after the mid-term elections, nail them both, and then say "President Pelosi." Heck, maybe she will even pick Hillary as VEEP.\n\n\n____________________________________________________\nA LITTLE ASIDE to Annoying up above: What part of the phrase "Scooter squealed like a pig" makes you think that the questioner thinks Scooter is "now a paragon of virtue and truth"? Actually I think it is pretty obvious to all but the kool-aid drinkers that Scooter is a scared little boy caught with his hand in the cookie jar who has just run out of lies.\n\nI think he needs to spend a long, long time in time-out.\n\n\n____________________________________________________\nA LITTLE ASIDE to Brian down below:\n\nAsking questions about our so-called leaders does not weaken America, not even indirectly. Sunshine is the best disinfectant.\n\nHowever, TREASONOUSLY OUTING UNDERCOVER OPERATIVES WHO ARE TRYING TO FIGHT THE SPREAD OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS **DIRECTLY** weakens America.\n\nAs for those responsible, "Hangin's too good fer 'em."
602243
Bush didn't keep his word is the correct answer to the question.
607191
Why do I still call myself a Bush supporter?  Well I am sure he will send troops to the boarder but not enough to actually curb the problem.  I heard this morning that the troops that go down will not be part of the enforcement.  So are they just going to stand around and count how many people are crossing.
794311
Bush...inquisitive?\n\nNo, he has no plan.
775954
It has not cleared congress yet.
992619
It is NOT decided yet.
948135
The reason President Bush has not been impeached is that he has not committed an impeachable offense. The liberals’ constant rant that he lied is in fact a lie. He acted on the same information that congress did when they authorized the war in Iraq. He did not lie under oath as Clinton did. In fact, his biggest fault is that he has been brutally honest and the liberals don’t agree with what he has to say. That doesn’t make it a lie. I wish the liberals would come up with a meaningful rant, but I don’t think they’re capable of it.
167453
In that speech he was talking about new forms of energy so to reduce the USA's dependency on oil.  He mentioned a longer-life battery for electric cars.  But sinch Mr. Bush is largely a self-seeking fraud, it's hard to know what is true or not.  He's done nothing right so far.