If the president of Iran & president Bush had a street  fight, who would win?
401584
the irani would kill them both by strapping bombs to himself
1068568
first of all bush would have trouble finding these weapons.. especially if they are of mass destruction... and clinton being able to act for himself would have no trouble defeating the bush- who  restricted from his animators by the cage would fall short of anything remotely capable of defending himself, or that country  he supposed to run...\n\nso physically clinton would win... but if its congress who decides the winner.. then i must say it would probably be bush who wins... though his capacity for living affterward would be likened to that of a vegetable after clintons beatingness of ample destructitude... \n\nindeed congress is corrupt.
463970
Neither. Iran is run by power-mad fascists, who will never act civilized, but they're not necessarily crazy enough to actually use a nuclear device. So, it would probably be a standoff between the civilized world and Iran over this issue.\n\nDiplomatically, every country but the US is afraid to use any pressure. No embargos or boycotts or sanctions. The 3 Euro-wankers that have been negotiating with Iran these past couple of years wasted a lot of time, because they were too much the sitzpinklers, to threaten a punishment of Iran for failure to comply.\n\nThe UN, as usual, is too busy sipping tea and denouncing America and Israel, to actually do or say anything useful.\n\nSo, like for the past 100 years, it means the USA has to do the heavy lifting for the good of mankind once again.\n\nI wish we would tell Iran, "If you attack the USA or Israel, we will wipe you off the face of the earth. Everybody else is on their own, do what you will. May Allah be merciful to them."\n\nI'm tired of spending American blood and treasure defending wankers.
257192
Bush = War against Islamic Facism
595556
The outcomes of such war would be pretty unsure, provided the US don't use chemical or nuclear weapons. The reason being that Iranians can be less equipped than the US but they are millions (millions of people in the Army i mean + those who would take a weapon should the US attack, exactly as it is happening in Iraq). \nDespite what many Americans or other people may think, Iranians are not stupid nor very much afraid of Americans. I think a war against Iran would end up exactly as the war in Iraq. Thay may fix Ahmadinejad but not all the clones coming out of there, turning the war into a permanent guerrilla, which in turn would cause a Vietnam-like situation. \nIt's what is happening in Afghanistan; it's what's happening in Iraq (And the US don't seem to envisage any tactics change) and it will also happen with Iran and Syria (Where Bush is planning to go immediately after Iran, as soon as he gets another valid excuse to gain some more oil fields). \nAnother point is: Are you all sure that EVEN IF, should the US win a war against Iran, causing millions of victims, that would be a victory in economic and diplomatic terms. No because what many out there didn't get yet is that in the world there are other countries too apart from the US and that means that certain actions are subject to the approvals of others too, at least because if you start a war next to my home country, i may have to handle refugees, terrorists etc. \nIn short, i think the outcomes of a war between US and Iran are very very far from seeing the Americans 100% winners. As a matter of fact they are not winning in Afghanistan nor in Iraq at the moment (It's a fact!).\n\nAnd mind me, all the above doesn't come from an antiamerican integralistic muslim, but rather from a Pro-America italian who has simply realized that the US are going a little bit too far in their so called "DEMOCRATIZATION" of middle east. And for those who may find my statements insulting, i'd suggest you all to wonder why the US didn't invade Saudi Arabia yet, since they are the root of the problem in that area...Will it be because Saudi Arabia produces 1/3 of all oil reserves in the world? Or because they enjoy a special relationship with the US? Or because they allow the US to keep their airforce bases over there (although not liking americans)?.....\nWinning a war is not simply killing the enemy and leaving the country. In these cases it's more about FIXING THE ONGOING ISSUES AND STABILIZING THE AREAS. \n\nThis would be best achieved with a President that is not Bush!A new Reagan would do as he had the brain it took and the balls to keep it real when situations get hard to handle, like in this case.
716478
The Iranian equivalent to George W Bush.\n\nAn insane religious nut.
848290
Bush or Osama?\nBut dear, they are financial partners.\nkiss
1000681
He's the president of Iran and he's been making Bush angry.
161945
Sometimes the entire Iran situation looks like Iraq, the current Iranian president 9being an independent candidate) seems like a perfect target to be the next Saddam Hussein. \n\nPolitically, the US is pressurizing the opposition to join them, as it is the governing regime will definitely go weak and then like in any other progressing economy they will have their foot in the door to make sure that there is a well paved road for them to commute whenever they want.\n\nI think only time will tell what exactly is the major game plan here, but one thing is sure it is not going to be a smooth ride and eventually the US will gain something substantial.
230056
I DONT THINK NEITHER WOULD WIN. THEY BOTH CAN BEAT EACH OTHER OUT IN LYRICS BUT IN A FIST FIGHT? I DONT THINK THEY HAVE THAT MUCH BALLS. IT MIGHT DAMAGE THEIR CAREER.
332195
The thing that young people should worried about is the draft Bush is threatening Iran with. The ages would be 18-37, this would take care of Americas financial problems. I wouldn't put it past him, since he cares not for the American people. War for oil is getting real old now. I really want to see some American diplomacy, that calls for compromise. George Bush is a looser, and is just stirring more fear up in the World to get votes, but America isn't scared anymore after all the Bush results of protection. Vote the Tyrants out and free America.
381808
Its entirely possible.\nIf the Iranian president continues to use Kruschev-like rhetoric then the west will prepare for the worst.\n\nThe Iranian president wants a confrontation.  He continues to make provocative and frightening statements.  With his boasts and threats he gives the west fewer and fewer channels of diplomacy.  Perhaps he believes he can succeed where Saddam failed.\nThe west will not be a Chamberlain.
62245
Iran has both a spiritual leader, called supreme leader (Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei) and a political/government leader called president (Mahmoud Ahmadinejad).\n\nIn its history, the spiritual leader has at times been more fundamental than the government leader, but right now it appears that in fact the president Mahmoud is an extreme fundamentalist.
44788
We're right next door in Iraq. Iran's president said he doesnt believe in the holocaust and now Bush is going to attempt to steal his oil with his ever so faithful weapons of mass destructions speech again.
660881
I would fight George Bush not because he is a bad president but because he is probably the toughest world leader at the moment and a hard bastard*&. \nIf i was to fight a actor it would be Tom Cruise he is in good shape but he is a pretty boy and bit of a wimp.\nAny pro fighter it would be David TANK Abbot from the UFC he is a bad ass but cant fight on the ground.\nGreat question but who would you  fight?
403027
Iran is a politically unstable country that has expressed a desire to attack it's neighbors.  The Iranian President apparently holds extreme views.  These things make Iran's possession of nuclear weapons very dangerous for its neighbors.\n\nIsrael, on the other hand, is politically stable and holds moderate views.  It is not a danger to its neighbors.
308986
How can you compare Ahmadinejad and Bush to the other 3?