Yahoo,can you give me some info about Civil War Factts?
413239
What aspect of the Civil War do you want facts about? The causes, battles, leaders, industry? You should be a little more specific with your question.
844334
"Godoompah" & "Starry Eyes" are correct.  The Civil War was an unmitigated disaster for both sides.  If that doesn't make sense to you; if you really can't understand how both sides could lose, then just try this simple three-step process....\n\n1) Open your eyes and read the deathtoll:\n    \n    120,000 killed in action \n    240,000 died of other causes \n  ~360,000 TOTAL Union dead and/or missing \n\n     95,000 killed in action \n   165,000 died of other causes \n ~260,000 TOTAL Confederate dead and/or missing \n\n  ~620,000 Union and Confederate soldiers \n   UNKNOWN total Northern and Southern civilian\n   casualties \n  \n2) Open your mind and think about it....\n\n3) Open your heart and feel about it....\n\nIf you really do this, neither the Civil War nor any of the other Overklass-generated orgies of mass murder will ever look the same again.....\n\nBefore some damn fool says so, I'm not a pacifist, a communist, or even a liberal ; I'm just a middle-aged guy who lived long enough to see through some of the crap our Beloved Leaders keep throwing at us to keep us all permanently mind-f***ed....\n\nNimadan
51945
The link below is to a site with all available information on the 4th Michigan Volunteer Infantry Regiment from 1861-1864.\n\nIt contains, a history of battles, photos and a list of members. Should be the most complete source of information you can find.
843301
The American Civil War Homepage \n\nhttp://sunsite.utk.edu/civil-war/warweb.html\n\nThe American Civil War Homepage gathers together in one place hypertext links to the most useful identified electronic files about the American Civil War (1861-1865). \n\nResearch/Informational Sites\n\nhttp://www.historyplace.com/civilwar/index.html\n\nhttp://memory.loc.gov/ammem/ndlpcoop/nhihtml/cwnyhshome.html\n\nhttp://edtech.kennesaw.edu/web/civwar.html\n\nhttp://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAcivilwar.htm\n\nhttp://www.civilwarhome.com/indexcivilwarinfo.htm\n\nhttp://ap.grolier.com/article?assetid=0173280-0&templatename=/article/article.html\n\nhttp://www.civil-war.net/\n\nhttp://members.aol.com/teachernet/\n\nhttp://www.refdesk.com/facthist.html\n\nGood luck.\n\nKevin, Liverpool, England.
538784
I just finished with the unit of the civil war, the Union had very unskilled soldiers but a lot of them, but the confederates had less soldiers with more skill, the confederates had the motherland aka England supply them but not enough supplies were able to come to them due to the fact that the Union had blocked most of the trade routes in the rivers, that wasone completed accomplishment.
762912
I found a link which has information on forgotten heroines of the Civil War.  It is about the nurses who cared for soldiers\nin dire conditions and has articles on lots of them.\nIt looked interesting, and there seemed to be lots of other links to information about Civil War women.
569247
These are very common subjects. You may consider doing research or checking class notes. For lack of that,\nthere was a big burst of industry after the civil war. Things became more advanced. More people moved to the United States and of course, emancipation of slaves had a great effect on the diversity of the population. Maybe these facts can help you to understand what sort of development you're looking for?\n\nSorry I couldn't be more helpful!
366664
Do a web search for Matthew Brady, Alexander Gardner, and Timothy O'Sullivan. They were all Civil War photographers. Lots of good info.
662985
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederate_States - Thats the confederate picture I'll help with Union soon.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:USA_Map_1864_including_Civil_War_Divisions.png - Thats for the entire United States but not labeled.
1122960
That was in 1865.  The Civil War was over, but the South had not yet been readmitted to the Union.
764353
You can get information at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_%281849-1865%29 for the information you are looking for.  I wont do your homework - but I will help you out (what kind of a history teacher would be then - lol)\n\nGood Luck!!!
515790
http://civil-war-replicas.com/assault-rifles-world-war-weapons-world-war-replica-guns.html\n\nCheck out this site.\nIt has everything that you need.
340867
Greetings,\n\nThere are no pictures of the South leaving, because they didn't go anywhere.\n\nThe southern states that formed the confederacy remained where they were, and their inhabitants, for the most part, remained where they were as well.  There was no mass migration, rather an expuslsion of everyone loyal to the Union and a seizure of everything formally belonging to the Union.\n\nThere aren't many photographs of the early part of the Civil War because photography was still in it's infancy.  There are many lithographs of the time though.  Lithographs are an artists interpretation rather than a photo.\n\n-matt
1098674
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Civil_War
429397
American Civil War, 1861-1865 \nAlgerian Civil War, 1991-2002 \nAustrian Civil War, February 12 to February 16, 1934 \nBoshin War (Japan), 1868-1869 \nChinese Civil War, 1928-1937, 1945-1949 \nCosta Rica Civil War, 1948 \nEnglish Civil War, 1642-1651 \nEthiopian Civil war, 1974-1991 \nFinnish Civil War, 1918 \nFirst English Civil War, 1642–1646 \nFrench Wars of Religion, 1562-1598 \nGenpei War (Japan), 1180-1185 \nGreek Civil War, 1946-1949 \nSalvadoran Civil War (El Salvador), 1979-1991 \nIndonesian Civil War, 1965-1966 \nIrish Civil War, 1922-1923 \nIrish Confederate Wars some parts of which were a civil war. \nKlang War; also known as Selangor Civil War, 1867 - 1874 \nKorean Civil War, 1950-1953 \nLebanese Civil War, 1975-1990 \nLiberian Civil War, 1990-1997 \nMozambican Civil War, see Rome General Peace Accords, 1975-1992 \nNigerian Civil War, 1967-1970 \nOnin War (Japan), 1467-1477 \nPakistan Civil War, 1971 \nParaguayan Civil War, 1947 \nRokosz of Zebrzydowski. 1606-1609 in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth \nRoman Republican civil wars, List of Roman Republic and Empire Civil Wars \nRomania had a brief civil war in 1989, after the fall of Nicolae Ceauşescu, between Communists and those against the former regime. \nRussian Civil War, 1917-1921 \nScottish Civil War; 1644-1652 \nSecond English Civil War 1648–1649 \nSengoku Period (Japan), 1467-1615 \nSpanish Civil War, 1936-1939 \nTaiping Civil War (China), 1851-1864 \nThe Anarchy, 1135-1153 (refers to the disorder during the reign of King Stephen of England) \nThe Brothers' Civil War, 1067-1072 (The war between King Alfonso of Léon and King Sancho of Castille) \nThird English Civil War 1650–1651 \nVietnamese Civil War, 1930-1975 \nWarring States Period (China), 475 BCE-221 BCE (this is not universally considered a civil war, but rather an international conflict. However each of the combatant states nominally acknowledged the authority of the Zhou kings of China, thus bringing them into one kingdom. This ended in 256 BCE, however this was a mere 35 years before the end of conflict) \nEnglish Wars of the Roses, c. 1455-1485 \nWars of the Three Kingdoms (England, Ireland, Scotland) 1639-1651 involved a number of civil wars: \nZulu Civil War, 1817-1819
1128896
Southern Advantages (Northern Disadvantages)\n\nFighting a Defensive War\n\n    * To stand on the defensive meant that the North had to invade and carry the fight to the South. This allowed the South to prepare and receive the enemy, although Lee was not a passive man by any standards. \n\n    * The South did not have many advantages, but just like in the American Revolution, it's very difficult to conquer an area. Essentially the South only had to muster the will to keep fighting until the North felt like quitting. That didn't happen, but theoretically it could have. \n\n    * When Southerners said that they merely wanted to secede from the Union they gave themselves a military advantage. Thus the North had to attack. \n\n    * The geography of the South favored the defender over the attacker. In particular, most of the rivers in the South run east to west. Thus as Union forces attempted to move south they had to cross all the rivers and the Confederates could defend them. Also, the fact that the Cenfederacy was simply defending itself meant that the Northern forces had to invade and occupy virtually the entire South before they could claim victory. That was a monumental task. \n\nFighting Spirit\n\n    * The South had soldiers who were devoutly dedicated to preserving the Southland. \n\n    * The South were the ones who started this war, they want to finish it. They were the ones with a motive. The North just wants to put the country back together. \n\n    * The North included "border" states like Maryland which had large populations of Southern sympathizers. The North constantly had to fight to keep up popular support for the war. \n\n    * Motivation. The South was fighting to preserve their homes from an intruder. The North on the other hand was fighting to preserve the union. To abolish slavery was added later, and this was cold comfort to most Northerners who had never seen a slave before. \n\n    * The Southern population, at least the white population, were more united than that of the North. In the North there was always a substantial political sentiment, based on various reasons, for not fighting the war and letting the South go in peace. \n\n    * The North was the invader. When troops approached the end of their volunteer enlistment, they wanted to go home. The Southern troops were fighting for their style of life, so they hung in there. \n\nFighting on Their Own Soil\n\n    * They were fighting on mostly native territory, thus they were more familiar with the ground. \n\n    * The theater of war was primarily in the South which was its home territory. Obviously the theater of war was well known to the South. The North was in enemy territory and was unfamiliar with the terrain. \n\n    * Since the Southerners were defending their own soil they were intimately familiar with the territory while the Northerners had to rely on maps. \n\nMilitary Leadership\n\n    * The majority of the best leaders were Southern born. When the South left the Union, these soldiers went with their home states. \n\n    * Military leadership of the South consisted of many Mexican War veterans. The North had some experienced officers. However the North's leadership was inferior to the South. \n\n    * Throughout the Civil War, Lincoln was trying to find generals that could win. Many say Grant was the only good general the North had. \n\n    * Lee, Stonewall Jackson, Longstreet, Forest, Stuart, the list could continue. The South was blessed with officers who knew how to fight and make the best of bad situations. \n\n    * A big portion of the Union's finer officers were from the South, and were more loyal to their home states when faced with the choice. Robert E. Lee is of course the most notable example, and would have been the first choice to command the Army of the Potomac if he had remained in the Union army. \n\nMilitary Aptitude\n\n    * The average Southerner had at some point in his life hunted for food. Thi
260942
go to this site\nIt has all you need to know about the battle of Gettysburg.\nhttp://www.civilwarhome.com/gettysbu.htm