how do I know the Boyles and Charles law (observation)? i forgot what i saw.?
413571
Boyles law related the pressure and volume of a gas, as pressure goes up volume goes down and vice-versa. Charles law related temperature and volume, as temp goes up so does volume and vice versa.\n\nThe collapsing can demo really does not show either of these laws. If you boil a small amount of water in a can for a few minutes the water will turn to water vapor and expel most of the air out of the can. Then you need to invert the can and place it in cold water. This will seal the opening AND cause the water vapor in the can to condense. After the vapor condenses to liquid water, it takes up less space--- this decreases pressure inside the can, and higher air pressure outside the can crushes it. Not related to either law because they deal with gasses only, not gasses that change state to a liquid.
135532
You can either look it up or determine it experimentally.\nI cant get much more specific without additional details.
629338
i saw a show once on these old mysterious structures. they had a map of the world and all of these structures were marked on the map. I couldn't believe what I saw… it formed a circle, actually two circles. The inner circle (dots) were exactly spaced between the dots of the upper circle.\n\nIt's hard to explain but what I saw was this... instead of drawing a circle around you would connect by going down then back up (like the letter V), down then back up, over and over again in a clockwise fashion. If you can envision what I am saying it turned out to be like a pie cut into several times…an arrow pointing to the middle!(no dot in the middle)\n\nI was screaming at the tv saying can't you see it, aren't you going to point it out? Nothing was said!!!\nI don't remember what show it was and I didn't have enough time to exactly see where it was pointing to.\nI wonder what mystery could be found in the center of that map?\n\nHas anyone else seen this????\n\nI just searched the web for an image to help visualy. looks something like the image in the link below.
125445
I will have to agree with the last poster, how do you think you can learn, if we give you the answer, I know I have the answer in my old notes. But choose not to tell you.\n\nBut since I'm kind natured,try the link, I can't say anymore.\n\nI hope you find your answer and learn it.\nAnhar Hussain Miah
610921
Both of the thigns you are talking about are very slow processes.  I'm terribly sorry to be a bubble-burster but that question has been long since pondered by geologists far and wide.  Very good observations but neither is very major.  Never stop thinking and learning just as you are now.  You will be a great mind, just keep it up.
355505
Go to this website: http://www.wylde.com/_videos/cg010001.html
269213
Here is a link right to the page with the video.\n\nIt is not clear but it is the best I can do.
180043
Umm....  there is no way to disprove it....thats why its called a law, not a theorem.  Also, you need to be more specific.  What ways?  Whats experiments?  \n\nAsk again with  more details and I will help you
468084
Greetings,\n\nKinda outta my league, but perhaps the link I posted can be of some use to you.\n\nDiscover had an article last year about a couple of inflation cosmology theorists who believed the speed of light, while constant now, was not constant in the very early universe, it was in fact slower.  Not sure about all that, but thought you might want to go digging for the article.\n\n-matt
275047
I like these two very much.\nCarefully read the theory of the related chap,\nThen try to solve the problems,\nthink more about the relationship of each theory.\nI cam solve any problems though I was blind for 1 year, then a tried to undersand,\nso i hope you can pass only when you think more about these.
1035169
André-Marie Ampère (1775-1836)\n\nTHE FRENCH PHYSICIST and mathematician André-Marie Ampère worked \nat the beginning of the 19th century in Paris, France. He used \nhis mathematical and statistical skills to observe and measure \nnatural occurrences that had been discovered by other European \nscientists. His greatest work involved the relationship between \nelectricity and magnetism, and the forces between conducting \nwires. He also developed a new way of classifying chemical elements.\nAmpère's name was given to the basic unit of electricity - the \nampere or amp.\n-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nRobert Boyle (1627-91)\n\nBORN IN Lismore, Ireland, Boyle became well known in his lifetime \nfor his natural philosophy. A pioneer of the experimental method, \nhe helped establish chemistry as a science, distinct from alchemy. \nHe suggested that matter is composed of fundamental "corpuscles" \nthat combine in different proportions. Robert Boyle is probably \nbest remembered for his study of gases. Boyle's law states that \nat constant temperature, the pressure and volume of a gas are \ninversely proportional.\nAs well as helping to found modern science, Boyle wrote a theology \ntreatise and organized lectures to defend Christianity against \nother religions.\n-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nMarie Curie (1867-1934)\n\nPOLISH-BORN physicist Marie Curie and her French husband Pierre \nare famous for their work on radioactivity. They were inspired \nby the work of the French physicist Henri Becquerel (1852-1908). \nMarie Curie was the first to use the term "radioactive" for substances \nthat emit invisible forms of radiation.\nShe also isolated two new radioactive elements: polonium and \nradium. After Pierre's death, she took over his job as professor \nof physics at the Sorbonne in Paris, the first woman to teach \nthere. She continued her research, looking for medical uses for \nradioactivity. She was awarded the Nobel Prize for physics in \n1903 and for chemistry in 1911.\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nAntoine Lavoisier (1743-94)\n\nTHE FRENCH chemist Antoine Lavoisier is regarded as the father \nof modern chemistry. He is remembered particularly for his work \non gases, gunpowder, and combustion. He named both oxygen and \nhydrogen, observing that these two gases combine to produce water, \nand explained oxygen's role in combustion. This led him to describe \nelements and compounds, giving many the names by which they are \nknown today.\nLavoisier and his wife Marie (1758-1836) were meticulous scientists \nwho produced some important manuals describing scientific experiments. \nIn the aftermath of the French Revolution, Lavoisier was executed \nby guillotine.\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nLouis Pasteur (1822-95)\n\nTHE NEED to solve problems affecting the French silk, beer, and \nwine industries led to some brilliant work by the French chemist \nand microbiologist Louis Pasteur. He isolated and eliminated \ntwo different bacteria that were causing disease in silkworms, \nand also produced an accurate explanation for the process of \nfermentation. He showed that food could be made safe by heat, \nin a process now called pasteurization.\nPasteur is also known for his work on diseases that affect animals \nand humans. He developed life-saving vaccines for treating anthrax \nand rabies.\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\nErnest Rutherford (1871-1937)\n\nTHE NEW ZEALAND-BORN British physicist Ernest Rutherford laid \nthe foundation for the development of nuclear physics and modern \nquantum theory. He investigated radioactivity and the nature \nof alpha (positively charged) particles. His most significant \ndisc
933713
You probably cant find it over the internet. \nJust work it out yourself.....you are studying the subject arent u?
911668
why dont you just look it up yourself, this is asking far too much, it will be a better learning experience for you if you actually find it out yourself....this requires looking at lots of good textbooks or many websites....just google it...
405243
They worked together. Across the space-time continuum.\n\nYou obviously aren't in the know.
1096274
The only thing I know that is close is called the Johannes law\nand it is Astronomy\n\nI hope this is what you needed
590185
Ha ha hahaaha - very smart observation.\n\ntrue - i m speechless
354230
Greetings,\n\nFollow this link to Sky and Telescope magazine's website almanac.  Plug in your information and it will give you the info you requested.\n\nhttp://skyandtelescope.com/observing/almanac/\n\n-matt