how to build a nuclear bunker?i dont lke the current political situation of the world.?
397569
haha. good luck with that.
1101282
Ask the country in a heart felt way to conserve energy.Explain the big plan with out any panic.Have a good leader that everyone respected state the plan.Everyone would obey the rules and follow the plan or else they have to pay big fines.
105575
I THINK THAT YOUR COUNTRY'S DIRECTION IN THE NUCLEAR AGE IS DEPENDANT ON HOW THE PROGRAM IS BASED AND IMPLIMENTED. HOW IT CAN BE GUIDED AND MONITORED FOR SAFETY VIOLATION'S AND UPGRADES. I DO NOT WANT FOR YOUR COUNTRY TO GET UPSET AT CURRENT EVENT'S AND STRIKE ONE OF IT'S ENEMY'S WITH A NUCLEAR WEAPON JUST BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE CAPABILITY.
999127
God bless you too. I agree with you 100%. The problem is, it isnt going to happen. Then we would be as bad as them. Wholesale killing cant be the answer. We have to do it right, but I'll tell you what, the thought of a few B-52's tossing some tactical nukes  does make me smile.
364014
I think we need to act.  An air strike targeting uranium enrichment plants combined with covert operations to discover and destroy any hidden nuclear threats would probably work best.  That would minimize civilian casualties and set the nuclear program back for years.  We could then encourage the people to overthrow the current regimen.
664082
No way (and it's a good thing too).\n\nFirst you need the fissiles which are hard to get (sure, you can dig up Uranium but the stuff you dig out of the ground is useless in a domb).  Either you produce weapons grade Plutonium in a reactor (which requires refueling every few months and would be very noticable if the existance of the reactor is known) or you enrich Uranium to weapons grade which requires enrichment facilities that aren't that easy to hide.\n\nGetting the materials to build the bomb is the hardest part.  The only real market for weapons grade nuclear materials is to law enforcement agencies setting up sting operations.\n\nAssuming you have the neccessary nuclear materials you then have two choices of design.  Either a gun type device or an implosion device.\n\nGun Type devices are very easy to do but they don't work with Plutonium (only with Uranium) but since you asked if it was easy if you have the Plutonium I won't discuss that any further.\n\nThese are harder to make because you have to have the explosives around the bomb go off at pretty much the exact same time to compress the material and make a mushroom cloud.\n\nAs for the actual details, those are classified for good reason although postgrads have been asked to design nuclear weapons using only publically available material and they seem to be able design things that are workable so a good physicsist could probably come up with something.
294373
just make a list of all the people you want to be involved.  send out an email to all, inviting their ideas on a certain subject.  \n\nyou could make a Yahoo! group, to help with the administration.
880762
First, you need to posses a very charismatic personality and have the ability to get people follow your every word.  You also need a have a slightly distorted vision on what life in your country should be.  Once those are in place you then need to systematically get people to believe in your vision and have them vowel to lay down their lives for you and your cause.  Once this is in place you then create a plan of the most vulnerable areas and begin to gain a strong hold in these areas. Once that is accomplished you then eliminate your opposition and start laying down rules and punishments for the unconverted masses.  Once all this is completed and you are in power, you then need to rule with an iron fist and make examples of those who reject your thinking.  Just make sure you are surrounded by people who you most trust.  \nGood luck in your future endeavors.
110203
I'm sure there is land that you can use. All you really need is a rock to start with.Claim the rock as your own country- INVADE- then declare war on america. They will come in, bomb your rock- you lose. But do you? after they bomb you, they pay to help you rebuild into something bigger and better, so that little rock you owned as your own country and declared war on america with is now re-built into an island large enought to acomidate a few hundren people and BINGO- you have the country and the land all to yourself to rule. hehe
995063
Take a trip to Cuba! then go to Somalia, then go to all the other 3rd world countries, and ask them your question. then join the US Military and see it from both sides, and then learn not to call people ignorant, unless you are looking in the mirror. Then after you have learned all this, you will still have no answers.
808157
Hey hey LBJ,  how many kids did you kill today?  It sounds like the same people running this one ran Vietnam.  Bush is not there to prevent disorder,but to  preserve it.  All so the plunder can continue while our military are security police for Halliburton and whatever other agents are there carrying out the plunder.  And don't forget we threw Afghanistan in as well.  Tell it like it is.  It does not exceed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but it is right up there on the scaremeter.  Well done!
904428
Looks quite easy to me. All you have to do is follow the foot steps of that Iraqi Chalabi. Feed false intelligence about nukes and WMDs to Bush. He would be very glad to invade your country.
967743
There are many communist (China, N Korea, Cuba) and socialist countries (Sweden, Russia, France) where your ideas and assistance would be appreciated. Forgive me if I don't rush out in a lather to follow in your wake.
591259
Containment was a very complex political and military strategy, and I don't think this sort of question is appropriate. I'm not trying to be snooty (well, maybe I am) but I really hope this is not the sort of thing being taught today.
558857
Your idea is great. I would love it. You can practically go anywhere in your own country !! Cool. Plus think of it, no cross border terrorism, no wars, no nothing. We wolud be living in a peaceful world. Most of the evils in this world are due to difference in any two countries. One is more developed then other this and that. Though your idea is pretty good, I am afraid that what you say beholds true! Indeed, Human greed for power and wealth will not make it possible in first place cause everyone in the political field today, atleast the president's of today's countries will want to be the supreme of this new country and there will be conflicts. And Secondly, even if it takes place, the developed will develop more while poor will become poorer as the competetio will increase far more than ever. That is a brilliant idea. But do no feel sad, you can still dream about it tonight because I know, I will. I definately will.\nSo Long. Keep thinkin of more of such ideas. Bye
678378
Plant the seeds for honest dealings.  Lead by example and convince others to do the same.\n\nToday's children/teens (offspring of the baby boom) will be the largest voting demographic shortly. Convince todays' youth as to how much political power that actually is. \n\nTake the initiative and start new political parties NOW (even if you are too young to vote).\n\nThe youth of the world are pationate and can make quite a bit of change become a reality.  Lead and train others to lead.
1116836
In reference to another post there is no working star wars program in place, we are just as vulnerable to a missile attack today as we were fifty years ago, now the likelihood of a large scale nuclear attack is much much lower without the soviets runnin around, though it is always possible that by some computer error that a launch will take place from either us or the russian silos, afterwards if we don't convince each other that it was a mistake it would probably lead to a full scale nuclear exchange, now that covers the U.S. and Russia, but don't forget the other nuclear nations out there such as Pakistan and India which are pretty much where the U.S. and Soviets were twenty years ago, so on that side of the planet I would say within the next two years that there is a 20% possibility of a nuclear exchange barring any massive change in policy or major event such as some sort of military incident betweent those two countries. It is possible that there could be a nuclear device smuggled and detonated in the U.S. by some terrorist organisation but that would not lead to a nuclear war, unless the perpetrators of such an attack posessed a nuclear arsenal. Let me just say that with today's great technology a nuclear device does not have to be any bigger than a briefcase and with lax border control and nearly unlimited funding for terrorist organisations in addition to lack of intelligence on nuclear material around the world it is very possible that some terrorist organisation may suceed in detonating a device on American soil. Let's all hope that never happens