Prez bush good or bad if he could run again would you vote for him yes or no and why are why not?
411253
George Bush is probably one of the worst presidents in history, his blunders are well documented and bears out in his approval ratings, I didn't vote for him twice and his daddy twice, both of them are in politics to serve their own self interest. Dubue was appointed to a first term and I think he cheated on his second so was never really elected. As for why not the list gets long starting with his appointment, the Iraqi war, Katrina, his supply side economics. When you go to the gas pump just be sure and thank George Bush. His policy's are the one that is responsible for the high prices, his policy's on illegal immigrants, and on and on and on.
140697
I have to say I agree with you. In his first term, he messed up, so we should not have re-elected him. His is driving America downhill.
972592
George Bush IS a great president. He is the best person we could have had in office when 9-11 hit. He's done a great job economically. Our economy is on the rise. He is also steadfast when it comes to the war on terror. I know that he cannot run for a 3rd term but if he could I would vote for him again.
648780
I would.  He's smart and principled.  One might think he should have spoken out louder about his disagreements with the Bush administration.  But his not having done more reflects only on his respect for stability.  He did all that was possible.  He's a good middle ground.
572452
Ummmm..\n\nNobody is voting for him. He cannot be up for re-election, and he was already voted in in the last election.
32612
I'd venture that they would vote for him in a 2nd term if they were to find out he was gay sometime during his initial term, simply as a strong political move that sent the message of "conservative humanism" to the American public.  A brave , new party, so to speak, kindler, gentler, less homophobic because "one of theirs" has somehow joined the other team.\n\nOn the other hand, if he ran for an initial term as a Gay Republican, I don't think he would get many votes from straight Republicans.  \n\nRepublican Senator Paul Koering never hid the fact that is gay, but had political problems because of his sexual preference.  The difference in his situation and George Bushe's Republican gayness is that Bush has a much larger constituency to convince that he's either an OK guy anyway or say nothing at all and let his voters believe that he's a sinful gay butt-rompin' devil.  If he were already in office, he'd make it a huge part of his re-election campaign and probably have little trouble getting over the hump (no pun intended) since Republicans are stuck so far up his ass anyway, he wouldn't have much convincing to do to sway them in favor of having room for another.
183841
A woman as president? let see England hasn't done too bad. If a good woman ran I would vote for her. Any person that is capable of moving the country forward deserves the chance. As for all the people that are condemning Bush, DID YOU VOTE??! because if you didn't you have no right to complain.
50089
The one pro of having the possibility of running more than twice is the concept of the "Lame Duck" Presidency.  This is where the President doesn't get much done because he doesn't have the possibility of moving forward his policy, so congress doesn't try to hard in a second term to push the adjenda.
896096
Absolutely.  He obviously has worked well within his rights as our president and those threatening various form of legal harassment are attempting to undercut our method of democracy.  I would not put up with that.\n\nNeither would most people.\n\nIf you don't like the decisions Bush is making, than vote against the party in the next election.  But, getting around our representational system with phony charges?  That kind of thing could easily lead to civil war.
696318
Not really.  This midterm election was more of a "recall" of the current Senate, and does reflect some mistrust and dislike of the president, since it was his party which lost seats.  However, the presidential election is still two years away, and a lot can change between now and then.  Also, the next presidential race will be a tough call since both parties much put forth a new candidate, as Bush cannot run again.
633833
No. I did vote for him, but mostly because I was voting against Kerry. If there had been a better opponent, I would've voted against Bush. Kerry was too wishy washy for me and wouldnt take a stand on the issues.
270616
If Bush was up for election, yes I would vote for him.  The reason for this is because I do not allow the press to influence me through its propaganda.  Instead, if I want to know about something the president has done, then I research it through multiple channels.  By this you can get an unbiased idea of what is going on and I have not seen where he has done anything so terribly wrong.\n\nImpeachment?  The Democrats would never be that stupid.  If you impeach a person when they are on thier way out of office, the vice president steps in and takes over.  Because incombents usually win presidential elections, Dick would be in office for 10 years (2 to finish Bush's, 8 with his two terms).  Do you think that the Democrats really want to block themselves from the Whitehouse for the next 10 years?
1029704
I voted Kerry, but I had voted for Dean in the primary and wish he had won the nomination.\n\nIf I had it to do again, of course I would vote Kerry in the main election (assuming I couldn't rally enough friends to change the Democratic primary results), but I would also take two particular friends with me to vote for President and let them experience the political process (I later found out that they had never voted for anyone, in any election).\n\nIn the meantime, I have a sign in my window reading "Impeach Bush," and I can only hope that my dearest wish will come true...\n\nor that at least our VP will resign over shame for his stances, his policies, oh, and for shooting someone in the face...and that Bush will find himself a far less efficient instrument for the radical right without his puppeteer in the wings.\n\nSorry, but I needed to let out some frustration there. Thanks for listening. Good question.
1059096
Well this is an interesting question!  Although life without Bush might seem like a good idea it just might be better for us to wait for the next Presidential Election to see that come true.  Why do I say that, Cheney.  Do we really want him as a President?  Just wait for the next Election and then we can have one big White House shake-ep without all the blood!
41723
If only we were so lucky. \n\nYes I definitely would. The country did great under his leadership. He could turn the economy around and re-build foreign relations again. \n\nI'd rather have a president that lied about his sex life than one that lied about nuclear weapons.
287527
Too late. Thanks for asking though. This is Bush's second term and we can't elect him because he can't run for office. \n\nDemocrats will decide after 2 years that Kerry or anybody else should run.
835383
Yes.  He could become President.