please help!! SCIENCE! uni !?
409764
well, to put it another way, how can you have an opinion about something that you don't really know anything about?\n\nSo, for example - Cloning: the immediate reaction of a large sample of the population is that cloning is wrong and should be banned, but this is without them really knowing the things that cloning actually encompases. Yeah you have the cloning of things like dolly the sheep, but there are also examples of therapeutic cloning, where cells may be harvested before any actual animal is made. Or the cloning of an extinct animal, or nearly extinct animal, to prevent its extinction. Through knowledge you get a more balanced view of the pros and cons of an issue rather than just the knee jerk reaction.
207210
go here: http://school.discovery.com/sciencefaircentral/
613443
Niuchemist is mostly right and deserves the vote, but there is one correction I would make-heavier molecules don't necessarily have less "kinetic energy", they move more slowly-it is the speed of movement that is the critical thing, not the kinetic energy, which is a product of speed *and* mass.
9558
hmm, well I'm a college student, I'm a freshman, but I'm a physics major and love talking about physics :)  I can help you with any physics problem or questions or something if you want.  I'm usually on the physics part of this site because I'm a dork like that and I like answering people's physicsy questions in order to procrastinate my papers and studying for my finals :p  I actually tutor kids in physics, so if you have any questions, feel free to ask, my e-mail is cmi3@yahoo.com
696750
try the following. they are really helpful.\n\nwww.tutor4physics.com\nwww.physicsclassroom.com
1031284
websites aren't that trustworthy for accurate scientific advice. I'd recommend finding someone to ask in person... Wilkipedia is good for some basic things, but anything beyond Physics 101 is a crap shoot.  \n\ngood luck
301027
I'm not sure which grade you are studying, but this is a website with a wide variety of science-related material.\n\nhttp://www.factmonster.com/homework/hwscience.html
779341
http://www.sirinet.net/~jgjohnso/matter.html\nhttp://www.usoe.k12.ut.us/curr/science/sciber00/7th/matter/sciber/intro.htm\nhttp://www.stcms.si.edu/pom/pom_student.htm\n\nhope they are helpful
778908
This website is quite helpful:-\n\nhttp://www.sciencebuddies.org/\n\n\nThis website contains a few sample projects and related theory at different levels.
1186091
Try searches at the following. You may need to hit the library.   Your answer will probably not be found on the web.\n\nhttp://www.scirus.com/srsapp/\n\nhttp://www.scienceresearch.com/search/
172930
look in a library book or a science book...
579359
http://science.howstuffworks.com/vdg2.htm
1083195
Come on now. Do your own homework. Wouldn't it be more efficient use of your time on the computer to search for "recent scientific article"\nTry americanscientist.org or .com or .edu
387766
Discovery Channel has some nice science project resources.\n\nhttp://school.discovery.com/sciencefaircentral/
1140497
Gravity holds things with mass together.\n\nElectromagnetism holds things with unlike electric charges together.\n\nThe strong nuclear force holds things with colour charge together over short range.\n\n\nHope this helps!\nThe Chicken
777731
Try this...this may help you http://www.stevespanglerscience.com/
258115
Basic Physics Questions\n\nI am a student, and I have a basic physics question about...\nThis question would be better covered by a physics teacher in your school that you can interact with for better understanding. You might get a science fair project out of it, too.\n\nDr. Louis Barbier and Beth Jacob\n(October 2002)\n\n\nParticle Physics\n\nI am trying to learn some physics on my own, but I find the descriptions of particles either too technical or too vague. I want a description of the structure of a nucleus and how particles are classified. I need a text that's not too hard, but without sacrificing rigor.\nI'm afraid you can't have a text that's not too hard without sacrificing rigor. If you have a background in physics, a standard undergraduate text book that I would recommend is Nuclei and Particles by Emilio Segre.\n\nDr. Louis Barbier\n\n\nSub-divide Electrons?\n\nCan electrons be divided into sub-particles or are they pure energy?\nThere is no evidence that electrons can be sub-divided. They appear to be pure, primary particles. Although matter and energy are in some ways different forms of the same thing, electrons have a rest mass and so are considered matter and not pure energy.\n\nDr. Eric Christian\n(May 2000)