advantage of ASp.NET 2.0?
408930
There are piles of advantages. It's compiled, it's got great namespaces / objects, you can use just about any COM or COM+ object out there, it's compiled, it has certain AJAX-like features.
387746
Briefly, there are Anonymous Methods, Iterators, Partial Classes, and Generics. I think Generics is the best new feature in C# 2.0 because it gives you more flexibility (like templates in C++) and it's a lot easier to share the same code for many different tasks.
892567
<Ruby on Rails> do you calling this a web programming,script???\nWell ASP is good,but it's little unpowerful\n\nPHP is better than ASP./More secure,more powerful,more faster and much more!/
228434
ASP101 was where I first went for learning it. Then move on to all the others out there.\n\nDont forget 4guys.
1084809
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/previous/2003/sysreqs/default.aspx\n\nIf you're using this type of software, why don't you know where to look for this information?
186406
You write ASP.NET programs in one of four programming languages: C#.NET, C++.NET, VB.NET or J#.NET.\n\nYou can write that code in Notepad, if you're really good; but chances are, you'll want an IDE (integrated development environment) to make coding a lot easier. Fortunately, Microsoft gives one away for free.\n\nTo download it, and for answers on all things ASP.NET:\n\nhttp://www.asp.net
891794
Take a look at this website.  These guys give some very good tutorials in programming.  They do a lot in ASP.NET.
1108203
Yes, with asp.net 1.1 and 2.0 you can build up applications following a 3-tier architecture concept.\n\nThe use of 3-tier architecture empowers you with the flexibility to adapt your application in a modular fashion, ie without having to change the all code just because, for example, you want to be able to connect to different database engines.\n\nBy the consequent implementation of data providers in asp.net, you don't have to mix up connection strings and data queries with your logic code.\n\nMore on this topic under:
1066730
A good service provider who cares about the client should make sure the client DOESN'T have to upgrade under any circumstances.  This said, there are situations when the uprgade is required because some mission critical-piece of hardware or software that the client just acquired requires Windows XP.  However, in a situation like this (especialy it if involves expensive hadware) it may be better to replace the computer rather than to just upgrade the OS; for example, there may be issues with USB 2.0 support on older computers, and you won't even know you have them until you upgrade.  \n\nA related development is when the cilent needs the computer to perform some server functions (for example, serve ASP pages for the locat intranet).  Normally, this would require IIS, but IIS cannot be deployed on Windows 98.  In this case, however, there are alternatives; Windows 2000 Professional will do the job just fine, so there's no pressing need to run for XP.
60974
I prefer PHP because it is very flexible and fairly easy to learn. I would avoid ASP because of all the security problems with IIS servers.
382120
I was pretty used to using VS6 and updated at work in the last couple of years to VS.Net.   For C++ developers, it's a nice jump to the .NET IDE that really gets them access to rapid Windows development.   \n\nBut for VB developers, it's a big change.   This is because VB 6.0 lives in such a different environment than VB.Net.   Visual Studio.NET is a TRULY object oriented platform and many of the oddities about VB were removed to put all of the languages on the same playing field.  For more on this, check out some of the migration articles on the following link.\n\nIn fact, one of .NET's main advantages is Language independence.   You can develop and compile VB, C#, C++ and many other languages from the same IDE and even in the same project. \n\nAnyway, even with VB, once you get past the big change in the environment, you'll see that .NET is very powerful when compared to VS6.0.   Things like inheritance and .Net framework calls (instead of those clunky Win API calls) make a huge difference.\n\nFinally, for web development, VS.NET provides ASP.NET, which is a big improvement over ASP.  Now you have a framework to do true structured programming for the web.  And it can be as simple as dragging a control on a form and coding behind just like VB 6.
1154872
I noticed by looking at the filename extensions on my space that it uses asp.net and cold fusion.\nASPX and cfm.\nMy guess is things were probably initially written in cold fusion.
1139642
There is a lot of difference between asp.net  and asp\n\n1 - Asp.Net has the following features which were missing in Asp. \n(a) Code declaration  block\n(b) Compiled - Asp was a scripting language\n(c) Object oriented - Constructors/Destructors, INheritance Overloading\n(d) In build client side validation\n\n2 - Session in asp weren't transferable across servers. In asp.net they can span across servers , can survive server crashes and work with browsers that do not support cookies\n\n3 - Asp was built on the top of windows and IIS and was always a separate entity and therefore its functionality was limited.  Asp.Net on the other hand is an integral part of the OS under the .net framework. \n\n4 - Asp.Net has features like Garbage collection , cultures, in built graphics support which is missing in asp
908921
see if this helps:\nhttp://aspnet.4guysfromrolla.com/articles/111605-1.aspx
292367
That sounds like a fairly difficult undertaking!  I certainly would not use plain ASP; you would be much better off using ASP.Net, but Ruby on Rails would be the other logical choice.  As far as skills, you are looking at a 3-tiered application: a user interface tier, a business logic tier, and a database tier.  So, you would need to know a fair amount of HTML and JavaScript to create nice web pages, and probably Ruby or C# for the business layer, and SQL and some database administration skills for the database layer.  Good luck!
338309
VB.net is more friendly to a VBA person than asp.net (shares a lot more similarity in code).  But, if you're looking for more Web based approaches, then asp.net is probably the way to go.\n\nVB.net is more for writing standalone applications where asp.net is intended for writing and deploying web based apps.  Asp.net requires the asp engine which is only available through the web server.\n\nThe .NET framework itself is just the framework.  It is used in conjunction with many different languages (VB, ASP, even C#).  VB.NET is just a version of VB that utilizes the .NET framework.
355688
Try looking on this site.  \n\nhttp://www.asp101.com/articles/paolo/asp2aspnet/default.asp\n\nThis site claims that their isn't much difference in the file structure of asp and asp .net.  I use Visual Basic .NET and the difference between vb 6 and vb .net is .net is object oriented, so even if you follow the directions on the page, your asp project won't be using the object oriented technology unless asp uses this.\n\nAnyway, hope the site helps.