did  any one  know  any  thing about     <ct scanning>  plz  send  me  books   as  u  can?
399105
CT Scanning means: Computed Tomography or CAT Scan\nThe following is copied from a Wikipedia source:\nComputed tomography (CT), originally known as computed axial tomography (CAT) and body section roentgenography, is a medical imaging method employing tomography where digital geometry processing is used to generate a three-dimensional image of the internals of an object from a large series of two-dimensional X-ray images taken around a single axis of rotation. The word "tomography" is derived from the Greek tomos (slice) and graphia (describing). CT produces a volume of data which can be manipulated, through a process known as windowing, in order to demonstrate various structures based on their ability to block the x-ray beam. Although historically (see below) the images generated were in the axial or transverse plane (orthogonal to the long axis of the body), modern scanners allow this volume of data to be reformatted in various planes or even as volumetric (3D) representations of structures.\n\nAlthough most common in healthcare, CT is also used in other fields, e.g. nondestructive materials testing.
155750
I love it. Have over 20 books on the subject, and still want more! Do you have any good book suggestions ?
693106
Use the newsgroup alt.binaries.ebook.technical, and post what you want there.  someone may have it.\nThanks
1184744
Do you want them scanned?  or mailed?
823829
The only way a cast could interfere with a ct scan would be if the cast had some sort of metal rod in it which is unlikely.\nIt's not the cast material that would interfere, only something metallic.\nHope this helps.
96387
Scanning gray scale by hand - Logitech ScanMan 256 handheld scanner - evaluation\nHome Office Computing,  June, 1991  by Steven C.M. Chen\n\n Save a personal copy of this article and quickly find it again with Furl.net. It's free! Save it.\nAT A GLANCE: Easy to use handheld scanner capable of capturing 256 levels of gray.\n\nDOCUMENTATION: Very good; explains all features and functions.\n\nSETUP: Straightforward, simple.\n\nVALUE: Excellent.\n\nSUPPORT: About average; prepare for a lot of busy signlas. Available via phone or bulleting board; both are toll calls.\n\nLIST PRICE: $499\n\nSTREET PRICE RANGES: $300-$350\n\nLogitech ScanMan 256 - scanning device - Hardware Review - Evaluation\nHome Office Computing,  Feb, 1992  by Steve Morgenstern\n\n Save a personal copy of this article and quickly find it again with Furl.net. It's free! Save it.\nThe Logitech unit is quite simply the best handheld scanner I've used--a combination of functional, innovative hardware design and powerful, easy-to-use scanning and image-editing software.\n\nThe size, shape, and feel of a handheld scanner matter a lot, and I find the Logitech unit fits my hand exceptionally well. To solve the common problem of the unit wiggling as you pull it across the original, the Logitech has been designed with one wide roller in the front and two smaller ones in the rear, providing a smooth, stable motion.\n\nThe second major problem with hand scanners is velocity--if you move the scanner too quickly (usually very easy to do), your results suffer from serious distortion. Logitech tackled this challenge with a Scanning Speed Indicator light that's clearly visible on the top of the unit. If you're moving at an appropriate speed the indicator glows green. Move a little to quickly, and it turns yellow. Exceed the speed limit entirely, and it turns red, indicating that you'd better start over.\n\nAnother smart design decision is the use of a single press of the scanning button to turn the unit on and keep it on until you indicate completion of your scan by hitting the keyboard Return (or Enter) key. Too many handheld scanners expect you to hold that button down throughout the scan--and that constant pressure makes it too easy to move the scanner off course.\n\nThe other key to Logitech's success is the Ansel image-editing software included with the unit. Running under Microsoft Windows 3.0 (which must be purchased separately), Ansel combines basis ease of use with several powerful filtering commands. I have been able to dramatically improve scans of mediocre originals by employing. Ansel's Smooth, Sharpen, and Equalize commands.\n\nThe only negative involved in using the ScanMan is the size of the unit--its scanning width measures just 4.1 inches across. Ansel does allow you to "stitch" two separate scans together to create a full-width image--it works reasonably well with line art, but photographs are more problematic. As long as you're working with reasonably small originals (snaphsot-size photos or modest-size clip-art images), though, the ScanMan produces remarkably high-quality output at a very reasonable price.\n\nCOPYRIGHT 1992 Freedom Technology Media Group\nCOPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group
551942
You are on the right track, read both books objectively and sincerely, I believe you will no doubt arrive at the truth. Kindly let me know the results of your findings at the end of your research, best of luck with your download hunt. Kind regards.
908486
once you scan it it will ask where do you want it to go.  Pick MS Word.  Save it, then send it out
995113
Here is a good place to start for prices: http://www.pricewatch.com/scanners/\n\nGood brands are Epson, IBM, Hewlett Packard
256776
Send them to a service like this\n\nhttp://www.myspecialphotos.com/scanning.asp\n\nor buy a scanner like these\n\nhttp://www.photo.net/equipment/digital/scanners/primer
777873
have a read at this, it may help.\n\nhttp://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/W7/W7A.HTM
155839
a lot of scanners are glued ...but if that is not your case try open it (there are some scues on the back)...but don;t use alcoohol
1160110
See in\nhttp://indscansteel.blogspot.com/
849951
google it, or send an e-mail to your local librarian
673507
This is total free u should downland follow the steps in the link\nRun a dos scan in the computer.\ni will give instruction for the dos scan \nhttp://ts.mcafeehelp.com/faq.asp?frames=1&docid=71397&CategoryId=243&chat=&s=1
988154
daddio,\nThe current technology used for cat scans cause no known harm. To read more about this, view my sources linked below. Good luck!
545066
ABOUT SCANNING:\n\nScanning is a legacy of the Unix/Win95/98 era. Before, everytime your computer crashed or turned off without a proper shutdown, it would recommend that you scan the hard drive for disk errors. In fact, many older Unix machines require you to do this; otherwise, they just wouldn't run. WinXP and Win2K are quite resistant against these types of errors, which rarely occur anyway.\n\nSo, you only need to scan when your computer turns off without a proper shutdown sequence. In addition, you could run the scan once every several months just to be safe. It probably won't have a tangible difference though. And if you have WinXP, you probably never need to run the scan more than once every 6 months.\n\nABOUT DEFRAGMENTING:\n\nYou need to defrag your computer if the hard drive starts making a lot of "clicking" noises every time it is accessed. Defragmenting once every other week with Win98/ME, once every month with Win2K, and once every other month with WinXP is recommended if you move a lot of files around.\n\nYou should run the analyze tool that comes with the defragmenter. If it's over 15-25% fragmented, you should run defrag. This is especially true if you're using Win 98/ME. Win2K/WinXP use NTFS, so they're less prone to fragmentation.\n\nIn addition, WinXP automatically defrags your computer on idle. I move thousands of files each week, and it's still less than 10% fragmented.\n\nSo if you use WinXP, unless you hear your hard drive making "clicking" noises and slowing down, you don't need to defragment it more than once a month. Personally, I almost never have to defrag my hard drive.\n\nLastly, if you have a small hard drive or not much ram, you'll probably be using a larger portion of your hard drive for the pagefile, which will get accessed more often. In this case, you'll need to defragment your hard drive much more often.