It is said in India that L.K.Adwani&Md Ali Jinnah are brothers i.e.BHAI-BHAI.Do you agree,if not why not?
397229
Yes I agree that they are brother in the concept of dividing the peoples , the minds and their hearts. Jinnah has divided the nation on the basis of religion where as Advani has divided the members of the family on the basis of religion. Jinnah did faught against both the britishers and his fellow brothers where as Advani is on the path of killing his own fellow citizens and getting humiliated by his own fellow partymen.
941379
All are spoon feeding babies. You could recommend them for Amul baby advertisement.\n\nAll we know about them is sons of departed eminent leaders. But they should work hard and get people approval before they could be called good politicians.\n\nAnyway munna bhai you ask really good questions.thanks
1108327
About Lala Lajpat Rai I know that he took part in the procession that was carried by some other etremists Bhagat Singh and the others in which they were shouting slogans "Simon Go Back'\nSimon was some cruel British Officer in those times.It was a very aggressive procession , ppl carried black flags with them to symbolise thier protest...but this turned out very ugly.Lathi charge was imposed on everyone and Lala was brutally hit and he died in the incident.
919799
both of the brothers were military vets....we should all be proud.\n\nPat gave up a 6 figure job playing for the NFL, and died in Iraq. God bless his soul.
119910
That's a scary tought.\n\nI don't think such a question can be put under such a hypothesis, since both countries are nuclear powers AND both governments proved to be strong-headed.\nIn the event of open conflict I believe neither will concede defeat without first resorting to their nuclear arsenal (after all, Pakistan built its arsenal for this very purpose, to counter the Indian threat). If such was the case, I doubt the human race will live to see the next day.\nIndia can't neutralize Pakistan's friend, unless it gains that permanent seat with veto in the UN Security Council, but then India wouldn't need to invade Pakistan, that would be too stupid.
594259
IRONICALLY THATS PRETTY MUCH TRUE.\n\nBUT, FOR UNKNOWN REASONS SOMEONE HIGHLIGHTING PATHAN AS A FAR BETTER BOWLER.
1159454
Well bro if you want all the history chronological then it here:\nKashmir was free and I should be given freedom....\n\n\n 1947: August 14/15. British India is partitioned into India and Pakistan as part of the independence process. Majority Muslim areas in the West (now all of Pakistan) and East (the place now called Bangladesh) form Pakistan. The British also allow the nominal rulers of several hundred "princely states," who were tax collectors for the British and served at British pleasure, to decide whether they wanted to join India or Pakistan. Pakistan demands Kashmir accede to it. The Hindu ruler of Kashmir does not make a choice. Kashmir has three major ethnic areas: Ladakh in the northwest, which is majority Buddhist; the Kashmir Valley (controlled by India) and the part now controlled by Pakistan, which is majority Muslim, and Jammu (in the south), which is majority Hindu. The overall majority is Muslim.\n\n1948: "Tribesmen" from Pakistan invade Kashmir with the support of the Pakistani government. The ruler of Kashmir asks India for help. India demands that Kashmir should accede to India first. The ruler agrees. India sends forces to Kashmir and the invasion is blocked. Kashmir is divided into a Pakistani controlled part and an Indian controlled part. This de facto partition continues to this date with the dividing line being known as the Line of Control.\n\n1948: India takes the Kashmir issue to the U.N. Security Council, which passes a resolution calling on Pakistan to do all it can "secure the withdrawal" of Pakistani citizens and "tribesmen" and asking that a plebiscite be held to determine the wishes of the people of Kashmir. Neither the force withdrawal nor the plebiscite has taken place.\n\n1962: India and China fight a border war. China occupies a part of Ladakh.\n\n1965: India and Pakistan fight a border war along the India-West Pakistan border and the Line of Control in Kashmir. U.N. brokered cease fire and withdrawal to pre-war lines affirmed by the leaders of the two countries at a 1966 summit meeting in Tashkent, USSR (now Toshkent, Uzbekistan).\n\n1970-1971: An election in (East and West) Pakistan results in an overall majority for an East Pakistani party, which is ethnically mainly Bengali. The Pakistani military refuses to allow the Parliament to convene. East Pakistanis demand autonomy, then independence in the face of brutal repression by the Pakistani military. Guerilla warfare ensues. About ten million refugees stream into India from East Pakistan. India also provides sanctuary to Bangladeshi guerillas. Pakistan attacks airfields in India and Indian-controlled Kashmir. India strikes back in West Pakistan and also intervenes in the East on the side of the Bangladeshis. The U.S., in a "tilt" towards Pakistan, sends a nuclear-armed aircraft carrier, the Enterprise, and its battlegroup, to the region, in an implicit nuclear threat to India (which influences nuclear politics of India in favor of nuclear testing). Pakistan loses the war on both fronts and Bangladesh becomes independent.\n\n1972: India and Pakistan sign a peace accord, known as the Simla (or Shimla) agreement, according to which both sides agree "to settle their differences by peaceful means through bilateral negotiations or by any other peaceful means mutually agreed upon between them." Both countries agree that they will not unilaterally try to alter the Line of Control in Kashmir.\n\n1974: India tests a nuclear device. Pakistan accelerates its nuclear weapons program.\n\n1980s: U.S. supports Islamic resistance to Soviet occupation of Afghanistan and also the dictatorship of Zia-ul-Haq in Pakistan, which promotes Islamic fundamentalism in Pakistan.\n\nLate 1980s: There is a state-level election in the Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir. There is evidence of fraud. Militancy rises in Kashmir. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, Hindu fundamentalism begins to become more power
840260
NO...\n\nAt Japanese shrine, the Netaji is god\n\nTokyo, July 30: At the Renkoji temple here, the Indians and many Japanese who come visiting know of only one god: Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose. \n\nIn a small patch of green outside the Japanese-style shrine in Suginami residential district is a simple but elegant bust of Bose, who was undoubtedly one of the most popular products of India's independence movement.\n\nAfter his reported death in a plane crash in Taiwan in 1945, an event still shrouded in mystery, his ashes were said to have been brought to the shrine. And over the decades, Renkoji temple has become a pilgrimage point for thousands.\n\nEvery day, someone or the other -- Indians or Japanese or both - make it to the shrine to have a glimpse of the grey colour bust of a bespectacled Bose, wearing his military cap, erected on a platform.\n\nMost visitors stand reverentially before the bust. Some bow their heads, as if praying to god.\n\nClose by, a rectangular black stone with Japanese inscription reads: "Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose: Monument". \n\nThere are also two separate stone plaques on the walls that state that three Indian prime ministers and a president have been to the shrine: Rajendra Prasad, Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Atal Bihari Vajpayee.\n\nThe caretakers of the temple refuse to speak about Bose. But a visitors' diary has several hand-written entries, by bothsIndians and Japanese, eulogising Bose, whose Indian National Army (INA) raised with Japanese help at one point looked set to militarily free India from the British Raj.\n\n"I am very lucky to visit this shrine. Great day for me," states an entry from Pulak Chakravorty of Bangalore.\n\nRana Gupta of Kolkata echoes him: "It is a very lucky day for me."\n\n"This is a great day of my life," adds P. Sharma of Ghaziabad near New Delhi. "At last I could see the place where the brave son of Mother India is sleeping."\n\nSushilkumar Shinde, former Maharashtra chief minister, pays his tribute: "My salute Subhash Babujee, who sacrificed his life for India."\n\nSudha of New Delhi is almost praying: "Please bless us!"\n\nSeveral entries are in Japanese language. Some of the visitors are from countries as far as the US, Chile and Germany.\n\nP.K. Mukherjee from South Korea states: "I am very excited to visit this shrine. We as Indians are proud of Subhash Chandra Bose, the patriot of India."\n\nAbhijit Dasgupta of Kolkata asserts: "I feel so proud to be here. Netaji will remain in our hearts for all time."\n\nSomnath Roy Choudhury, also of Kolkata, adds: "One of the great moments in life, paying respect to the greatest freedom fighter of India."\n\nG. Sanjivi Rajan says: "Our respects and namaskar to this great freedom fighter of India."\n\nSujoy K. Sanyal of Kolkata is emotional: "I feel I have come on a pilgrimage. I feel sad that we, in India, are forgetting about his sacrifices and ideas." Another Kolkata entry simply says: "I am overwhelmed."\n\nAbhijit Desai of Mumbai is all praise for Bose: "Thank you, Netaji, for contributing to India's freedom. You live in our hearts. India is proud of you. Jai Hindi!"\n\nSome have praised the Japanese government for maintaining the Bose bust and for helping to organise annual events commemorating his life and times. \n\nThere is one man, however, who has a different point of view.\n\n"This so called ashes of Netaji is a ... conspiracy," says A. Sinha of Kolkata, echoing the view of those who believe Bose never died in the Taiwan plane crash. "Our greatest hero is immortal... He was a victim of imperialism."
1063295
If you would truly like to read some about this, there are many books available from the internet and Ebay.  I have read several about the life of Edgar Cayce.  I don't intend to indoctrinate anyone.  You would have to decide for yourself, and have the right to reject it.  In India, this subject is not even discussed.  It is like knowing that babies are born, and that everybody will die at sometime.  Those two facts cannot be disputed, and there are no arguments about whether birth and death is true or not.  Reincarnation falls into that category.  They don't argue about it or discuss it.\n\nRecently a couple from Louisana with a 5 years old boy revealed their true experience.  When their son was approximatel 1 year, he began to have frequent nightmares,  Parents did the natural thing.  This went on until he was approximately 2-3.  The boy loved airplanes and had every sort and description.  One day, his mother bought him a model of a WWII aircraft.  She began to explain the parts and under each wing there was a cylinder.  She explained to her son that these were missles.  The boy replied, those aren't missiles, they're extra fuel tanks.  She passed it off, but felt a curosity about his knowledge of WWII aircraft.  Finally one day, his father decided to ask his son questions about his dreams.  The boy began to explain that the plane was on fire and going down.  This was the basis of the nightmares which were ignored in the past.  His father asked what happened.  The boy said it had been shot down.   Father asked, who shot it down?  The boy, with astonishment said, "Well, the Japanese, of course."  Father asked where tihs happened.  In the Pacific, he answered.  On further questioning, the boy, mind you, 2-3, told him that he was stationed on a carrier and gave his father the name of the carrier.  He also gave his father the name of a friend on the ship.  With much difficulty. his father learned that the carrier was a small one and had indeed served in the S. Pacific.  The father then tried to find the pilot by the name his son had given to him.  The pilot is alive, or was recently, and was found in Arkansas.  He verified all that the boy had spoken of.  The plane in the dreams crashed in flames and the pilot never found.\n\nThis has been documented by other sources, not me.
504999
I always thought suri was a type of man powered chariot in India. More similar to cross- inbreeding.
80444
lol, i guess the word "son" means "year" right? well it was 1992, under the captaincy of Imran Khan.
803747
Probably u have not heard the name of Budi Kundaram, who was the best wicket keeper we had and subsequently, Sadanand Viswanath. I would rate Dhoni only after these two. eventhough I also hail from the place of Dhoni. Apart from these, we had N.Thamane
925520
hey man I was wondering just an educated guess on my part but were your parents "SIBLINGS"??
1003123
no but pakistan and india were one nation in the past and the british led to their division which was very depressing and awful as their were massacres all around as people of hindu and muslim religion were just running towards the indian and pakistani parts (now) respectively.
1187247
yes my friend he is real Pathan with his full name Irfan Khan Pathan.So enjoy!!!!!!!!!!!
1096101
Rahul Gandhi. If Advani becomes the PM, he'd probably make ethnic cleansing legal.
815942
Yep, I remember hearing about that. I think they are also related distantly. I saw that on some family tree website, how weird!