Do you think that the Holy Grail might have been Jesus' child?
405841
Would it be so wrong if he loved Mary Magdelene and had her child?  I don't think so.  Jesus was supposed to be the perfect human being.  Wouldn't the perfect man want a wife and family?  I think the fear is that if there was a child then Jesus' bloodline has been passed on and just as the pharasees were afraid of Jesus's judgment and what he stood for back then,  Religious leaders today know they may be no better off perhaps even worse off.
559055
basically a professor follows various clues and comes to the conclusion that jesus and mary mgdalene had a child, and that his blood-line continues to this day.  this blood-line is the true "holy grail" - nothing to do with a cup that held his blood when he was on the cross.  The book implies that the catholic church has known this all along, and has kept it a secret - even making jesus out to be the son of god rather than mere mortal\n\nthere!
1174668
It's common knowlege that there are tons of scriptures that where left out of the bible. Many thought that the "Holy Grail" was these lost scriptures. \n\nAnswer - No, the bible is not complete
645853
Maryam : 19 : 88-92\n\nThey have said that the Beneficent God has given birth to a son (19:88). This is certainly a monstrous lie! (19:89). \n\nThis would almost cause the heavens to rent apart, the earth to cleave asunder and the mountains to crumble down in fragments, (19:90) to ascribe a son to the Beneficent God (19:91). \n\nThe Beneficent God is too Exalted to have a son (19:92).\n\nAz Zukhruf : 43 : 81\n\n(Muhammad), say, "Had the Beneficent God really had a son, I would certainly have been the first one to worship him (43:81).
1019817
Which story?\n\n* The story of Robert Langdon and Sophie Neveu?  They're fictional characters, the invention of the author.\n\n* The story that Jesus and Mary of Magdala were married and had children?  It seems unlikely -- although the Bible doesn't specifically say that Jesus was *not* married, (1) it would be a strange thing to omit considering that even Simon Peter's mother-in-law gets a mention, (2) none of the early church historians say anything about it in their writings, and (3) the Gnostic books that imply the possibility of romantic relationships between Jesus and MM were all written, at the earliest, 120 years after the fact.\n\n* The story of the Priory of Sion?  I think it's been fairly well established that, at the very least, Dan Brown (as well as the authors of /Holy Blood, Holy Grail/, one of his major sources ) was duped by the hoax -- see Wikipedia's entry on Pierre Plantard for more details.  Based on Brown's own statements and writings, however, I get the impression he's trying to talk out of both sides of his mouth on this one, so I'm having a hard time imagining him as an innocent victim of Plantard's ruse.
587186
also... if god had a child, (jesus), why shouldn't jesus have a child?
1181661
miracles, no.  Jesus, I believe several people (not just apostles) have written of him.  From what I understand though, few imply the possibility that he's the son of God.
238285
I believe that Jesus was a great prophet who was more in touch with God than any other ever has been.\n\nThe idea that he is the son of God or that there is a holy trinity is something that I've never been able to wrap my faith around.
345469
Basically, Jesus was a man, who married Mary and had children.  His bloodline survives to this day.  The Holy Grail is not a chalice of any sort, it's his and Mary's descendants.  The Catholic Church thought it would be best to keep this hidden from the public, and to also turn Mary into a whore so that people would lose respect for her, the position she held as the wife of Jesus, and for women as a whole.  It also goes on to explain how the Catholic Church has used it's position to change actual history and have us raised to believe in stories that in fact didn't happen.  \n\nReally, just read the book.  Twice if you have too.  Besides being entertaining and a very good read, it leaves you with lots to think about.  Being raised a Catholic and having doubts about my beliefs for years and years now, this book was a real kick ..........
913743
Yeah that is a good question, and I am not sure how to answer it myself. Children do come up with the best questions though don't they? I guess my answer as cruel as it sounds the other twin should have accepted Jesus, and How could God do that? Well he  is God so anything is possible through him, and the first twin would be given a new heavenly body free from defect.
722523
ALL THIS 17 YEARS I HAVE BEEN TRACIN GOD I DID NT FIND ONE.BUT ACCORDING TO ME JESUS WAS A BABY LEFT IN CATTLE SHED.HE WAS FOUND BY MARY WHO WAS A VIRGIN SO CALLED VIRGIN MARY (MOTHER)AS SHE WAS NOT MARRIED.HE GREW UP AS A NORMAL BOY BUT HAD TO FACE HUMILIATION OF BEEN BORN TO MARY WHO WAS VIRGIN.HE TRIED TO PREACH LOVE BUT IN FAVOUR THE JEWS PRIEST WANTED HIM TO CRUCFIED .BUT THE COMMANDER OF CEASER WAS NOT HAPPY WITH THIS AS JESUS HAD ALREADY FACED THE PUNISHMENT HE REQUIRED.SO HE MADE A PACT WITH JESUS THAT THE CRUCIFICATION WOULD BE DONE BUT IT WOULD IT WOULD BE A PLAY HE WOULD BE GIVEN ANESTHESIA (MOSTLY WINE IN THOSE DAYS) AFTER THE CRUCIFICATION .HIS ALIVE BODY WAS SHIFTED TO THE CAVES SECRETLY HEALED AND HE RECOVERED IN 3 DAYS .HE WALKED INTO THE CITY AND ASKED HIS FOLLOWERS TO COME WITH HIM .HERE ONLY JUDAS FOLLWED HIM FROM HIS TEN FOLLOWERS .PEOPLE FOLLLOWED HIM AND WENT TO EGYPT .AND SETTLE BESIDES A NILE RIVER BASIN.JUDAS NEVER BETRAYED JESUS HE FOLLOWED THE ORDERS OF JESUS .HE WAS OBEDIENT ,FAITHFULL AND DIFFRENT FROM OTHERS THATS THE REASON JESUS LOVED HIM.JESUS MARRIED MARY AND WAS ALIVE FOR 45 YEARS AFTER CRUCIFACTION .HE HAD A SECRET FAMILY WHICH WAS PROTECTED FROM BEING KNOWN TO MANKIND .THERE ARE MANY EVIDEINCE OF IT.THE BIBLE ITS IS ONE IT STATE MARY MAGDELENE AS A PROSTITUTE TO PROTECT ITSELF .AS THE CHURCH SAYS A PERSON CAN BE GOD ONLY IF HE IS SINGLE.THE CHURCH ALSO SAYS GOD IS IMMORTAL .DOES ANY ONE NO WHAT IS IMMORTAL .IT MEANS UR NAME SHALL REMAIN IN THE MINDS OF PEOPLE EVEN IF THE DUST FROM UR BONES IS GONE.
818087
I believe that there is a lot of compelling evidence for the theory behind the Da Vinci (everyone should notice that that's what you asked about, not the novel itself)\n\nThe Priory of Sion part is highly questionable, but the evidence for the bloodline of Christ is very plausible and at least as "provable" is the orthodox Christian account.
28315
The Holy Grail might exist but not as what the people think. It's a symbol rather than a cup. It won't give you inmortality but it can give you wisdom.
1010804
Do you sincerely believe literally that Jesus was holding His own flesh and blood?\na little more study of Scripture might help here.
554361
Yeah I guess he was, I mean, where else would he have gone? I think it was traditional then for the father to be present to deliver the baby. Matthew 1-2 and Luke 2.
658993
Jesus didn't have a "special cup." If you're referring to the holy grail it was folklore that originated around the 12th century AD, 1100 years AFTER Jesus!\n\nTo answer your question:\n\nJesus did have possessions but from what we can surmise He most likely left them at His house with His mom while He continued His ministry. After He began preaching Jesus it seems relied on charity and donations to fund His missions. He could have bought stuff during that time with that money I suppose but from what one can gather Jesus didn't really care about material possessions. Not because there's anything wrong with gathering possessions, but because He had everything He needed.\n\nSecond Question: All my stuff will go to my friends and family to help them like my stuff helped me. The vatican will probably give all their stuff to the next pope to squander away just like always.\n\nhope this helps.
375207
"There is actually quite a bit of written history from that time period that proves he did exist. But thanks for playing anyways."\n\nHAHAHAHAHAHA.... prove it. Show me one single piece of paper and I will believe you. The fact of the matter is, there was NO record of a historical jesus. In fact, St. Paul (who recorded the very first story of "Jesus") didnt mention anything about a virgin birth, miracles, or even this plane of exsistance. It was set in the same relm as Zeus, Hera, and other fictional characters. There are no writings from ANYONE who supposedly followed "jesus". If you know of any first hand evidence, I will gladly look at it and convert my faith if its true. So heres your big chance, all you good christians out there... In fact, Im gonna make it a new topic.