Would you date a guy who legally(licensed) conceals a gun?
411306
sure why not ? at least he can protect you.
689728
Most states in the west like Texas and Georgia have a law that a civilian can own a firearm legally.  Once it is displayed in public view for all to see.  If you are driving it must be displayed on the dash board of the vehicle.  I don't know of any other states at the moment.
298809
Find out about the laws for carrying concealed in your state first, for one thing.  Then go someplace where you can actually try a number of guns--maybe a gun shop with a shooting range?--and see what works.  Maybe take a shooting class, and learn about guns properly.\n\nAnd last but not least, never forget that anything you choose is available for them to take away and use on you.
599060
I'd say it's a total loophole, the law says that a convicted felon may not purchase or have a firearm in his or her possession; by marrying someone you do not assume their punishments so, I'd say yes you can marry someone who owns guns. However, if that person were to be caught and convicted of a crime in the possession of this said gun the law would then apply.
1160017
What you are about to do is illegal.  READ THE YELLOW FEDERAL FORM.   The firearm must be for you.  If you buy it then give it to him you have committed a felony because the gun was never meant to be for you!!!!!!!!!
1020598
not necessarily, but I would not tell any of my secrets to anyone who I do not know really well. You need to trust him first, know him and feel comfortable to talk about it....
19352
Date a Private Investigator.
578085
No, I wouldn't date someone like that.  If he's always the innocent one then he doesn't know what he did wrong and chances are he will keep doing it.
844935
OMG - You guys need to grow up. Your bf got shot? Why? Is he worth all the aggrevation? He may not grow up if he keeps getting shot. Sounds like a bad idea to pursue this guy. Move on.
428578
Depends on the situation. I do have a carry permit. I have carried in the past. I also actively hunt. For "everyday" no, I see no reason to at all.
1137436
that is not up to florida but up too the fbi. they did a background check on him and the mental problem wasn't on record. if you are concerned call your local fbi office and they will have it revoked it will go on file and he will have to give up his permit.also he will never be allowed to own a hand gun again. problem solved.
613954
The ramifications are huge -- not only for law enforcement but for the common everyday person too.  There are a lot of very unstable people walking around freely and some of them are medicated to the point of intoxication.  Consealed Carry has the potential of putting innocent people at greater risk and that alone is cause for concern.  If a private citizen/person has the right to carry a fire arm it should be exposed.\n\nIn the United States, concealed carry (a.k.a. CCW) is the right to carry a handgun or other weapon in public in a concealed manner. In some states, it applies only to the carry of firearms as all other weapons are expressly not covered by the right. Even as the number of states adopting legislation permitting this has grown, it has met with opposition. Currently, 48 U.S. states permit adults who have applied, have no criminal record, and (in some cases) meet training requirements to carry one or more handguns in a concealed manner. In some states the same permit may be used to openly carry a handgun. In others open carry is prohibited even with a permit. A few states do not require a permit to carry openly.\n\nIn 39 of these states, issuing officials may not arbitrarily deny a permit application, a practice known as Florida-style "shall issue." A further eight states have "may issue" laws; typically specific "need" must be established, but in practice, this is often a mechanism to prohibit most people from carrying.\n\nThese "may issue" states range from "shall issue" in practice (Alabama and Connecticut are examples) to "at the whim of local officials" (such as New York, Massachusetts, and California; rural officials in those states liberally issue permits but officials in urbanized counties generally are more restrictive) to "almost non-issue" in states such as Maryland where even documented death threats are sometimes not sufficient to convince officials to issue permits and to "never-issue" Hawaii, where permits are never issued under any circumstances.\n\nTwo states, (Vermont and Alaska), allow any non-felon who has reached the age of 16 or 21 respectively, to carry without a permit of any kind. However, Alaska residents may still obtain a completely optional, non-required permit so as to receive reciprocal carry rights in other states, or to gain exemption from the NICS background check.\n\nAs of 2006, only two US States—Wisconsin and Illinois—have no provision whatsoever that would allow for the legal concealed carry of firearms by "ordinary" citizens. There are currently movements in each of these states to pass concealed-carry laws; legislation was passed in 2004 and again in 2005, but vetoed by the respective governors. It is expected that Wisconsin will have a signed Concealed Carry law by the end of 2007. The Kansas legislature over-rode the governor's veto to pass CCW on March 23rd, 2006.\n\nReciprocal recognition of concealed carry privileges vary by state to state, are negotiated by each state with each other state where reciprocity exists, and additionally depend, in some cases, on the residency status of individuals holding each state's concealed carry license. Presently, a license from most states, held by a resident of that state, is recognized in approximately 30 other states. In contrast, a license from most states, held by a non-resident of that state, is recognized in slightly fewer than 30 other states at present. Attempts have been made in the US House to pass legislation to force all states to recognize all other state's concealed carry licenses, much as driver's licenses are recognized in all other states besides the one where issued, but no corresponding attempts at such legislation have occurred in the US Senate.\n\nCarrying a weapon is an enormous responsibility. Training courses spend a considerable amount of time discussing the many aspects of liability should one actua
1168668
No.  I don't date men who are not literate enough to spell "pastime" correctly.  And how in the world did you manage to cover Celebrity Poker Showdown in orange Cheeto powder without any of the rest of us noticing?  You are a clever little monkey, aren't you?
878503
I would say it depends on your states laws on it. As some states its legal to carry mace (with being certified as a concelaed weapon or device )while others very illegal. I know in New Mexico, where I am it is currently legal to own one however if your ever stopped it is illegal to conceal any weapon. It must be out in the open and in any crossing with a officer you must notify them immediatly you are armed. I know though the state is currently working on a law for it and it has been talked either banning it from the public to carry or make persons take a class at there expense to carry one. Check with your district attorney or ask a peace officer in your area. The city Im in just recently banned the public (civilian) from carrying tasers in public, its kind of conflicting right now since its only a local ordinance made and some say it could conflict with the states statue soon to come out. I do know it is totally illegal to carry mace, weapons or tasers into military installations or have them on your person/car on a base.\n\nI do have experience and carry one on duty. I would say it is a good device however I think any joe shouldnt be able to carry one as it can also be deadly to some. To carry mine me and fellow officers had to take written tests, courses on proper uses, and proper situations to deploy it and then were tasered with  x-22 tasers to feel the effect as same we have to be maced once a year to carry it for certification. I know the classes we took here from a trained instruction person it took us all a month in training on its proper use and testing to ensure everyone was widely aware of its capabilities and effect, and again said what situations to properly use it in. We hardly use it unless the situation really needs it. The cops tv show you just see all the good situations they require it to be used where as I have only used it twice in a year, being the other guy had a gun or large knife. So I wouldnt just deploy it just because billy joe is fisting up.\n\nIm guessing you want one for self defense. I know most manufacturers, specially like Galls, GT, etc.  will NOT sell any x-22 type guns used by law enforcement to the public or any similiar. I know some companies sell to the public but ones sold to the public are not as good as a x-22 and very less effective, as I dont blame them for doing this. I wouldnt want the 17 year old Im about to confront with one either.\n\nBut call your district attorneys office or local pd and inquire it.
180061
This is probably going to largely depend on the type of restraining order, and the state you are in.\n\nIn California, many restraining orders prohibit the acquisition or possession of firearms.  \n\nSo, if the employment you are seeking requires the use of a firearm, such a restraining order (while it was valid) definitely would have a negative effect on your ability to obtain that job.
40773
Yeah.  Do you want someone with an anger management problem to be carrying around a gun?
560176
OMG,if U are gonna follow these rules U wud become a lady killer \nosm..Then U can thank me for it..He He\n\nBTW,what happened to the handgun..Did U try using it..lol