Expalin the 4-3 Defense?
397055
you have four down linemen (2 ends 2 tackles) and 3 linebackers. \n\nX  X  X  X\n  X  X  X
365959
Defense cause that is what I play
834335
4th is most balanced without question, really strong\n3rd is most explosive with LT, who is really all you need
424143
4-3-3 because you have your center defense as the sweeper and the other defenders as regular defenders. For the midfields, there are two outsides and one offensive middle and one defensive middle. For the forwards/strikers, there are two outsides and one middle. The outsides will recieve and dribble the ball and the middle will be ready for a cross if needed. This formation gives you more defensive strength as well as some more offensive options. This can work on any level of team that you are playing (easy team means defensive midfield goes up and hard team offensive midfield comes back).
437497
I'm giving examples on 4-4-2, 3-5-2 and 3-4-3\n\nIn the 4-4-2 system, the two fullbacks will support the attack at will, making it 4 on the wings, 2 in central midfield spreading the ball, and 2 strikers ready to attack the ball in the box. While defending, the 2 wingers track back and help out, making it 4 on the wings, 2 in central midfield and 2 centrebacks marking their strikers.\nBasically, the 4-4-2 is a very versatile formation, capable of attacking and defending.\n\nIn 3-5-2, the 3 defenders would most of the time be sitting back compact.The 2 wingers are in charge of attacking down the flanks, and the 3 midfielders in the centre are crucial to the success of 3-5-2. They have to win the balls in central midfield. In defence, they have 2 at the sides, against the overlapping fullback, 1 defender would be pushed out wide, and 1 central midfielder comes in.\n\nIn 3-4-3, the 3 defenders, again, stay compact in defence.\nThey rarely push forward in support of the attack. The 3 strikers are the key along with the attacking midfielder. They are supposed to pressure the defenders into mistakes and give away the ball , and the 2 side strikers move out to help the 2 wingers, and they basically more men around the box than usual.
1047369
hard to say...lets look. new offensive minded, air it out, style coach. a couple of free agent QB's who like to throw. (especially McCown) a decent RB, a tight end that can catch, and 3 very gifted (and troubled) WR's. add all that up with a fairly tough schedule an i would say 7 and 9 is as good as you can ask for.
90663
romeo Crennel by far.  No one said the 3-4 d would work but look at what they did. their worst loss was to pittsburgh (41-0)but its hard for the players to get pumped up for a big game when you introduce the special teams
275509
If U mean what positions of the Deffender that he could play in,so at first it depends on the formation of the team.As an example,in 4-4-2,there are:\nright back\nCenter back\nCenter back(again)\nLeft back.\nIn formation 3-4-3,there are:\ntwo third backs who are center backs like in 4-4-2,in addition to a Sweeper who plays behind them.\nIn 5-3-2,the deffenders positions are:\nright wing back,\ncenter back\nLibro\ncenter back\nLeft wing back,\nHere are the most famous formations that most of teams in world use,but also in any formation in world the deffender positions won't come out from the positions I sayed.\nI hope I covered your question.\n:)
936213
What type of fantasy basketball are we talking about? Head to head? Rotisserie? If roto, what stat cats? You need to provide more info to get a legitimate answer.  \n\nAnyway, four person leagues are waste of time. \n\nCheck out the link below for more details and a damn good resource for fantasy bball (at least from what I've found that's out there).
441138
You want a large DT (nose Tackle) to clog the middle.  Larger DE's (more like hybrid DT's) and at least one pass rushing OLB (ie. Shawn Merriman or Lawerance Taylor).  One of the major differences in the 3/4 is that you need larger bodies up front but you have a lot more flexability with how your LB's line up and play.
1009639
Eagles have a defense?
939536
USC!!!  I would think momentum is on USC's side.  USC is starting to be comfortable with the 3-4 defense that was newly introduced this year.  Now that the defense has adjusted, this year's defense is not only as strong as last year's defense but quicker with the availability of 4 linebackers as opposed to 3 linebackers in years past.  That being said, let's not overlook UCLA.  I don't expect USC to lose, but let's exercise at least a little caution.  FIGHT ON!
886068
Yes, you can slot in Colston easily for your TE spot...no brainer. He leads the NFL in recieving...and although it may have looked like a fluke the first quarter of the season he keeps producing. Also, you have stallworth back and healthy so you should have three productive recievers still. Plus, I dont like lienart and fitz just came back...I see it as a bit of a steal for you. Your defenses are sub par but the rest of your team is well rounded...might as well improve where you have the biggest weakness.
827021
Ravens +3... that defense is nuts and i think the offense can do enough to keep them in the game\n\ni wouldnt touch the total... that game could be 28-24 or 14-10
956611
I would have to give you a 8.  Your defenses are probably killing you.  But, the rest of your players should be able to offset the beating your D/ST's are getting.  \nI'm very, very disappointed with Pittsburg and Tampa Bay this year...especially Pittsburg.  I thought they would be better at this point of the season than they are, and many picked both of these teams to be in the playoffs...not in contention for a top 10 draft pick.
945197
Your answer is simple. You take shockeys points(and projected value in mind) along with whatever defence you already have.  Add them together and see what the value would be versuses what the point value would be with Chicago defence and whatever backup tight end you have (and projected value in mind). Do this with all trades to see if you are really benefiting.  Keep strength of schedule in mind.
103899
No defense.  You got a bunch of shooters (Marbury, Francis, Crawford, Rose...) who don't want to pass the ball.  And a weak post presence.  Most nights, those gifted guards will put up their points.  But Knicks opponents never have trouble marching right past them into the paint and collecting easy baskets inside.  \n\nI bet it bums Larry Brown out when he turns to his bench and sees that Ben and Rasheed Wallace aren't there.