what is difference between terms of "CONTRACTING"and"SUPPLING"?
409959
It's hard to make much sense of this. Any agreement supported by consideration (money for money or money for value in goods or services) is a contract.\n\nA contract to supply a project means an agreement to provide one or more items need for the project.\n\nSupervision is a service, and a contract can provide that the same person or legal entity will provide the items and supervise their placement or use.\n\nConstruction contracts often provide for specialized products and services to be provided by the same person or legal entity (e.g., electrical installation, plumbing installation, alarm system installation, foundation building, framing, drywall installation, interior woodwork, etc.\n\nThey are both supply and service contracts, or both supply and service agreements. To try to call one a contract and one an agreement makes no sense.
1141224
Best scenario would be to consult with a legal professional on what's appropriate for your business needs.\nBut you can look at some legal docs online you might find useful... Just make sure you both agree to the terms.\n\nhttp://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2006-20,GGLG:en&q=legal+document+contract
1161168
The validity of the contract will not be affected by the place of signing or preparartion.\n\nFor other details u should explain the nature of arrangement.
662482
both terms are interchangeable.  But dictionary term is listed under dekameter.
272494
They accept bids from sub-contactors or simply offer the job for a spacific price and hire a sub contractor who accepts that price.  Unless there are unusual or unforseen circumstances, the contractor will hold th esub-contractor to their verbal or written agreement for payment for the job.  Larger contractors set the price for sub-contracting work more often tha small contractors, who tend to use the bidding process.
1070580
Hi!\n\nThe prior answerers had some good advice, but in the meantime, you might be able to also find a sample on FindLaw.com:\n\nhttp://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/business-forms-contracts/business-forms-contracts-a-to-z/#b\n\nGood luck!
677212
Letter of Intent\n\nKind of like a pre-contract where you agree to purchase (real property or goods) at certain basic terms, with the rest of the terms to be agreed in the final contract.
372667
A plaintiff is someone who has filed a lawsuit.  A defendant is someone who is defending against a lawsuit.  That has nothing to with contracts.  If you are negotiating a contract, there is no specific legal terms ot name the negotiating parties.  After you reach an agreement, you are a party to the contract.\n\nIf you make an offer, you might be called the offeror and the recipient by the be offeree.  The basic elements to a contract are:  (1) offer; (2) acceptance of the offer; and (3) an exchange of value.
1170705
Basic contract law - offer, acceptance and consideration.  You are bound to the contract that you sign, but you are not required to sign a contract.  You can decide not to sign, and they can decide to withhold services.
828054
Most contracts have a 48 hour resting clause.  So you should be able to   it is called breathing room.
125272
I would have put this under Words and Wordplay, but here is fine.\n\nAs for the question, it really is a question of situation. Contract the two that you don't want emphasis on.
971759
A stipulation agreement is a contract. And just as enforcible as any other contract.\n\nWaiving statutes of limitations may or may not be against public policy, but that doesn't render the rest of the agreement unenforceable.
610058
A D&B Contract is where a client (public or private) will engage a contractor to "Design & Build". The Contractor will then engage an Architect, Engineers, Quantity Surveyors etc to complete the project.\nA traditional contract is where the client engages the Architect, Engineers etc to do the Design and then employs a contractor to solely "Build".\nBasically the difference then comes on who has more liability and control over the finished product: In D&B the contractor has control over the project and therefore more liability: in traditional the client has to cover himself for any problems that may arise, but has more control over the project. Clients sometimes enploy a Project Management firm to ensure that the control is organised through them.\nThe basic premise is therfore simple, but there are complexities depending onthe contract
1151030
Hi!\n\nIn general, contracts are 100% binding if the parties signing the contract are legally able to do so (ie: they're not impaired) and if the subject matter of the contract is not illegal.  (This is a VERY watered down overview.)\n\nThis means, however, if you have agreed to non-compete or non-solicitation language in your contract, courts are very reluctant to step into the agreement and try to figure out the intention of the parties.  As a result, language like this, while potentially harmful, is valid language.\n\nOn the non-compete side of things, though, there has also been a general reluctance to stop a person from doing the work that is their livelihood.  In otherwords, if you are a carpenter and you sign non-compete language, you will probably still be able to work as a carpenter even if this means breaking the agreement.  The test usually used is whether not performing whatever it is that you said you wouldn't perform will result in substantial harm to you.  In other words, the courts are willing to invalidate this specific language because you not working would actually potentially result in a burden on society... which outweighs the possible benefit the other party has in you not working.\n\nNon-solicitation language, on the other hand, is more flexible.  Language such as this is usually between two businesses and merely says that you will refrain from hiring employees away from the other party... and that they will refrain from hiring your employees away from you.  A good contracts person, however, will limit this language to say that this does not extend to an individual from Company A actively responding to open job postings from Company B... but will prevent Company B from directly asking that Company A employee to apply.\n\nSo, the quick answer is that non-competes are generally not favorably viewed, as they are damaging to the interests of the public, however, non-solicitation language is usually ok.\n\nGood luck!
568462
I have see both terms used on road plans, and have heard both spoken on various road projects.  Either seem to be correct.
1026167
It means that you are about to sign a contract of some sort.  It's like an agreement.
453858
There's not a contract as in a signed one, but in this case there is a contract under the UCC.  This is especially true since both the parties are merchants who have a good deal of knowledge on the subject at hand, however since the merchant selling the books made a counter offer (the change in shipping price) the buyer must accept the counter offer for it to become binding.  ie If they don't wish to pay $6/bk for shipping they must not take the books, otherwise they are consenting to the counter-offer.