Is there any probability of war between man and machine as we saw in matrix trilogy?
411037
sigh......\nIm sure we are smart enought to make robots that have the ability to do so\nAnd if we do\nim sure we will make a button to shut down all robots
238212
I do accept the impact of Star Wars and other Science Fic movies.\n\nBut I think if there is one movie which shook the foundation of the "Reality" while still lurking in the realms of Fiction.. \n\nIts MATRIX..\n\nIt made me ask so many questions. Doubt so many things. Its too vast a subject to discuss in 200 words...\n\n.:Fishie:.
135657
Its a good question.\n\nWe know because feelings such as love, humour, and sadness cannot be created by a 'Matrix'.
37851
I quite disagree with Darrius. The law of accelerating returns and Moore's law make it inevitable that by no later than 2040 we will have advanced so far technologically that we will be able to do all that they do in the Matrix movies and more. We won't need  a huge spike driven into a hole in the back of our heads though. (Ever hear of wireless networks?)\n\nWithin a decade or two we will be able to supplement our brains with implants allowing us to parallel process (multi-task), enjoy instant and total memory recall, and communicate via the then ubiquitous, wireless Internet with other people or computers including being able to download information. \n\nThis is just scratching the surface. Check out my source links and hang on, we're all about to go on one heck of a ride.
110067
It happens in the realm of science fiction (Babylon 5 or Star Trek), but in reality, I doubt it.  Revelations says so, sure, but as one professor at my college put it: "We're eventually heading in that direction, but we'll probably wipe each other out before we actually accomplish that".
732128
Neither would win, they would resolve their differences and team up to destroy the evil robots and martians. They would be known as Pinjas. :)
267689
What will happen in the future is not a fact, but an opinion, however the most scientific opinions on the future are those that are based on logic, such as chronicling a cycle of events and deciphering the pattern in the trend of events to accurately predict the future.\n\nLogically, I think a third world war will occur, because of the contemporary existence of the same conditions and trend of events that led to all previous wars and world wars. The world of humans will come to an end, but not the world of non-humans, either from the pollution caused by the nuclear warfare of world war 3 or the massive industrialism that might take place in rebuilding the modern world after the destruction from world war 3 (global warming), or from uncurable plagues, such as bird flu, AIDS, HIV, and etc.
1145600
maybe "earth final conflict"
101044
Yes, we won: Neo got rid of Agent Smith, that was the evil side of Neo trying to take over the Matrix. Because of this, the rulers of the Matrix decided to free all the humans that were still connected to it, and people and machines will go back to living together. The Architect, when he speeks to the Oracle, indicates that. You might want to rent The Animatrix, it gives background on the origin of the Matrix, and some interesting graphics.
1103975
There has been war since the beginning of man's time on earth what changes are you expecting?
397568
finite resources plus infinite demand for resources equals conflict.\n\nbut the term "war" can mean many things, so i guess it depends on your definition of war.  if the term "war" is taken to be as broad as the term conflict, then yes--war is inevitable.  if, on the other hand, you mean by the term "war" a very specific type of conflict manifestation at a very specific level of the organic hierarchy, then i would suggest that it is theoretically possible to mediate the infinite conflict in different ways by revising the parameters of the organizational structure.\n\nfor instance:  one of the unspoken but very real reasons for war is population control.  (this isn't to imply malificent despots cackling wickedly as they plan population reduction wars--it has to do with the natural pressure of increased direct competition for resources erupting into violence as systems fail to accomodate basic needs.)  as social systems continue to naturally develop greater control over modes of reproduction (i.e. the progression of sexual mores, marital rituals, birth control and sex education, extending into the near-future developments of genetic engineering, cloning etc.) the state will learn to preclude population surpluses in order to obtain the greater efficiency provided by a more harmonious stability.  (if you find this logic hard to follow, think of it this way:  when the technology to enhance genetic traits such as intelligence, longevity and athleticism  (or provide extra senses and adaptations for tech interface ports) becomes available, the government will control it.  although there will be fierce battles to preserve natural breeding, the vast superiority of genetic engineering as a mode of reproduction ensures its eventual succession (if we survive the terrorist attempts to induce an apocalypse rather than allow the human race to be succeeded, that is).  when test-tube offspring become the norm, a non-violent population control system will likely emerge.)\n\nanyway--this addresses only one cause of war, but i'm sure you can see how the ramifications can extend to all the various aspects of the current institution of warfare.  the conflicts will remain, but what we call "war" (people killing people in organized battles) may very well disappear sooner than you think.  (although it's also possible that the future modes of conflict resolution will be far more ruthless than our primitive wars).\n\ni'll leave you with one more thought to elucidate my point.  thousands of years ago our primordial ancestors (closer to beasts than to men) waged a different type of war--not for land or ideology, but to eat or be eaten. their primitive minds were probably incapable of conceiving of a state of affairs where the sabre tooth was not a fierce and cunning enemy, where a perpetual vigil for a tactical battle to achieve a visceral kill would not be a constant and necessary aspect of the daily lives of their children.  and yet, with remarkably few exceptions, this war has long since ended.  there is no predator that regularly hunts human prey, and only an infinitesimally small percentage of the food eaten by humans in the modern world is hunted in the wild.  the war has ended.  and yet the conflict remains.  in order to survive humans must eat.  in order to be eaten, the food must die.  only now, this conflict is resolved through a peculiar social contract.  we breed livestock and crops whose sole purpose of existence is to feed us.  we kill them, but it can't really be called war. they offer no real resistance, and they only reason they were given their strange lives in the first place was to be eaten.  i used the term "social contract," and indeed, that's what it is.  civilization authorizes their birth on the condition that they be an easy (and delicious) food source for humans.  individuals that are especially docile or delectable succeed in reproduction, and inefficient
428221
Na just the Matrix trilogy.. But funny story; Carrie Anne Moss used to be in a tv series called Matrix back in 1993, which was about a hitman called Matrix :)
49031
if we dont watch out maybe it will. iam not trying to be a pessimist but there is a lot of crime(terrorism) and other kind of wars different countries indulge in and with the help of technology its a lot easier to have a war
419017
Yes, but I belive that one day, machines will be feared to high exxtent, due to the intelligence, that are programmed into machines. As the technology in machines increase, so does my fear.
528237
I think prety much the same except there will be a lot of internet sites, there user interface will be more 3D and there will also be more disadvantages like spam, hacking, etc.  The war between computer viruses and anti-viruses will still go on.
744487
Matrix?  What about Terminator?!  I always laugh when people say how can computers take over?  Our children take over from us - and we taught them everything they know... Why isn't it possible?  If you can teach a computer to have original thought (and why isn't that possible if a human can do it, and computers have processors like our brains) then I don't see why they wouldn't rebel.\nYeah gotta love those animatrix cartoons.  They rock. Very scary though.
1018885
Outcome 1:\nNo, the world will end before then, especially if North Korea/Iran don't stop it with their nuclear programs.\n\nOutcome 2:\nNow that computers have become such a large part of our lives, I don't see us ever not using them.  They will become much more advanced and the way that we interact with them will change dramatically.\n\nOutcome 3:\nWe will develop computers that become too powerful and we will live in a world much like the Matrix (maybe we already do ;) ).  Come to think of it, what if in the Matrix, people built computers inside the Matrix and these computers made another Matrix, like a Matrix inside a Matrix.  You could call the second one Matrix Jr.