Discovery or Discloser law?
414305
It's not a statute, it's a court rule of procedure. Discovery takes in interrogatories, requests for documents and depositions. It can include a "view" when the locus of an event cannot be seen from a public way.\n\nJust because the information has been disclosed to the party's lawyer does not mean it can be shared with a spouse of the party, since the attorney must maintain attorney-client privilege even as to a spouse.\n\nIn a criminal case, the prosecution generally has a duty to disclose evidence exculpating the defendant. The defendant, except in MA and a couple of other states and federal courts, there is no general duty on the defense to share information with the prosecutor.\n\nA defense lawyer will usually share any disclosures with the defendant. But the lawyer will tell the defendant not to disclose it to anyone else if it will affect the case when it gets out.
1141541
Litigation doctors or patient or Gov.??\n\nwhat we need is enlightenment
1007655
GET A LAWYER TO FIND OUT , OR CALL LOCAL GOVT TO FIND OUT
205912
That is proprietary information. It is not released to the public.
467802
He or she can probably get into more trouble by withholding evidence.  The words that come to mind are: accessory after the fact.  I believe that could apply here.
1075474
A scientist's discovery could be used for the benefit of humanity or for the harm of humanity.  Do we sacrifice the benefit because of the possible harm?  It is a question society needs to answer.  The discovery has no intrinsic right or wrong.
617355
Yes and no.  It has to be warranted or the other party has to know.
566689
Not exactly sure what you're asking.  You or your attorney should be able to file a Motion for Discovery (of evidence) with the prosecutor or court.  This asks for written/recorded statements of confessions make by you to law enforcement, your criminal record.
468096
Probably best to seek legal advice (lawyer).
1057851
Is there a question in there somewhere? \n\nYou seem to have forgotten to include a legal question.
601109
I think the rest of the saying is:\n\nWhat is revealed is interesting...\n\nWhat is hidden is even more interesting!
1001079
You have to file the official document or motion requesting discovery.  Otherwise, they can and probably will ignore your request.\n\nIf you request discovery properly, they do have to share the evidence with you.  The clerks can NOT help you.  That would be practicing law without a license.  Your best bet is to see if your state has a self-help legal center, possibly linked from the official state website.  It might have the forms for various motions on there.  Otherwise, you can do a google search and see if you can find one.\n\nGood luck.
1094661
Go to the website and look. They disclose that information.
1124959
Generally not.  A suit to confirm title is between the two parties of interest and shouldn't impact other innocent parties but that too depends upon state and jurisdiction.  It also depends upon whether the parties were aware or reasonably should have been aware that there was a cloud upon the title.
232368
If the information given conforms to State regulations in its content and is not mistruths they can get away with it, however just about anyone can be sued for just about anything these days. Whether you have a potential winning case depends on several legal factors that your lawyer would no more about than yourself, probably.
1048974
they  can  charge you but depending on the evidence that they have against you you might not be convicted. If you have a public attorney i would ask him to get you your discovery, if not you can go to court and request a copy of the the discover. If there is no evidence to support the charges that they are filing against you have nothing to worry about.\nGOOD LUCK!
696474
Not my career. But it can affect others, if they are not documented.\n\ncc