do you think : is there any nuclear bomb in iran ?
412788
As usual, "ProfessorAdam" is perfectly fine when Isreal bombs somebody but if that plan was proposed by President Bush it would be a failure of diplomacy that led him to it.\n\n"ProfessorAdam" is the biggest assclown on Yahoo! Answers.
603394
Iran can not have the atomic bomb !\n\nHey!.. Where are all you bush supporters on this one! This time bush is right (for once)
390533
While Iranians themselves have not invaded other countries, the government's rhetoric is very anti-western and full of hatred.  Hatred is a very dangerous thing and when you couple that with atomic/nuclear energy, there's your bomb right there. According to the IAEA?? I suppose they're about as credible as the UN?...thank you smiter! \n\nAs far as no documentation of Iranians having participated in terrorism...was not the current Iranian leader one of the hostage takers in the Iranian Hostage Crisis that occurred during Carter's administration? \n\nIn regards to the Iraninan youngsters-I only hope NEO's right.It's so unfathomable that a small group of extremists/fanatics can control an entire governmental system as well as the country. I can only say how sad of an example Iran is in regards to what extremism of any sort does to a country and to its' people. Iranians were known worldwide for their being a very highly cultured and intellectual people.  This has been squashed and suppressed by the Iranian government. Citizens have had to hide books, be careful of what and where they say/do, what they wear(women are beaten for wearing nail polish, makeup, or if their stockings aren't black enough, or they're without covering for their hair),lest they be heard and reported, jailed or worse. \n\nI hope that the Iranian people can one day return to live as they were, without the extremism/fanaticism ruling over their lives; and bring back a more moderate governmental system-then we can truly say that the Iranian government isn't dangerous for other countries.
484455
I saw this same question asked over and over again by different persons at Y!A.... \nWhy???!!!\n\n\nI wonder what is it about Iran that you think we people outside Iran do not know but should know? You tell us...please!
653608
Well nor does Iran have any nuclear weapons and nor is anyone claiming that they do so.All the countries of the world are worried about Iran's Uranium enrichment program which is a prelude to developing nuclear weapons technology.And rest assured Bush is not dumb he does not think Iran has nuclear missiles he is only concerned that it may develop the same in the near future.
656776
I say that you are crazy.  Iran cannot have nukes, no if's, and's, or but's about it.  They have vowed to wipe Israel off the map, and a nuke would give them the means to do it, and permanently.  A weapon that deadly in the hands of insanity is just that- insanity.
433489
To answer this you must have some expertise in the field of Nuclear technology. The worst thing to do is to reply and just answer. This is dangerous. You have to see things from different angles and try to analyze them. Yes, Iran has joined the nuclear gang in Uranium enrichment only i n a very low degree. It is the 10th country to get its hand on the Technology. However Iran is long away from becoming a Nuclear threat with Nuclear bombs and missiles.\n\nThe theocratic government in Iran is using this to oppress the Iranian Opposition and reformists in Iran. Do you think if USA was sure that Iran had Nuclear weapons, he would even wait a second? Come on guys.\n\nWith all the hatred that I have towards the Ayatollahs and I wish them fall by Iranian resistance, I condemn any attack on Iranian soil. To complete this, let's not forget that USA is the only country so far using the Nuclear bomb on Civilians. Now whether Iran wants to get their hands on the bomb or it wants it for Civil  purposes, it is a questions for coming days but the fact is that USA has used it in the past. \n\nIn my opinion, crazy people like Bush, Ahmadinejad and Bin Laden should take a family picture together as bloodthirsty- Vicious people of our beautiful planet. If we get rid of these extremists all, we can breathe in a free world. Long live Socialism and freedom!
679993
Small amounts have been found in Iraq, though not at the levels we believed.  Personally, I still believe that they could've been removed, but that's a debate for another day.  \n\nThe current Iran situation is that Iran is seeking nuclear power, however, most of, if not all of the world sees right through their current nuclear work as purely for the attainment of a nuclear weapon.  The president has even gone so far as to publicly state that he wishes to wipe Isreal off the map.  All we'd really like to do is to go in and see for ourselves how advanced they are, and they're denying that as well.
525283
lol no there is iran and thats it
322245
We've beaten the odds so far, but probability has way of catching up to up you. Let's look at current crisis.\n\nTargeting sites in a nuclear war with Iran, or any country in the region, would involve widespread nuclear contamination and large numbers of casualties. It would be impossible to limit this to Iran alone. And even in extreme circumstances, the only clear requirement for high-yield strategic nuclear weapons would be on some selected command and control facilities; their use would have to be restricted to a small number of targets because of fallout considerations.\n\nIf Iran did acquire atomic bombs, it would put pressure on other countries in the region to do the same. Many Arab countries believe it is unfair that Israel has nuclear weapons. If Arab countries, notably Saudi Arabia but also Egypt and possibly Syria, found themselves caught between a nuclear-armed Israel and a nuclear-armed Iran, it would greatly increase pressures to pursue their own nuclear options. \n\nThis could result in a regional arms race in the Middle East which is likely to be quite destabilizing, given the number and intensity of conflicts and instabilities in the region. \n\nBecause of Murphy's Law, the conflict could escalate into a major confrontation between US and Russia/China, especially when long range missiles are fired by the US at Iran (for instance), it could be interpreted by early warning systems in Russia and China as an attack against them. \n\nThe military people call it "accidental or false attribution". How does China know the missile is headed for Iran and not them? By the time the flight path is determined, it could be too late to form a retaliatory response, hence, it's better to "launch on warning". A global nuclear exchange could be initiated in a nuclear war in the Middle \n\nThere's been over 20 close calls during the Cold War and Post Cold eras, from the Cuban Missile Crisis to the accidental training tape incident at NORAD in the late 1970's, to the more recent 1995 incident involving a Norwegian science satellie launch. The hair triggers nearly put the world into a nuclear inferno. Most people in the world did not know how close they've come for the nuclear sword of damacles to come tumbling down on the heads. \n\nEven today, we only stand 28 minutes from a nuclear at any given time. The aging Russian early warning systems and their reduced security after the break-up of the Soviet Union should be real concerns. \n\nIf anything, a nuclear war will be the result of accidental launches from a false alarm from the two 'strategic' superpowers.
344348
Iran won't have a deliverable nuke for 5 or more years so we have plenty of time to work an alternative solution.\n\nMaybe the world will get lucky and they'll nuke themselves or fry enough of their technicians in accidents before they get "The Bomb".
122762
no. i am not from iran. but i sooo dont agree with you that iran is a terrorist country !!!! you cannot mark the whole nation as a terrorist,couse of some groups of people.you'll find terrorists all over the world if you look better.but they are extreme individuals, not the country.
223602
Which situation are you talking about? Iran and North Korea either have or are going to have atomic bombs soon. Pakistan and India both claim to have hydrogen bombs (which are much more powerful than the atomic bombs=uranium bombs).\n\nAtomic bombs are a type of nuclear bomb as are hydrogen bombs.
53857
I am an iranian...here everybody thinks that iran`s nuclear activity is peaceful at least this is what the governers say...i wonder if iran has the technology to make nuclear weapons but i dont believe that they can make atomic bombs! \n\nbut believe me iranians are not those kind of people to attack a country or sth...all iranians are kind people and we love living in peace because we have suffered a deadly war before and here nobody likes to see a new war!!!
1120143
I think Iraq went to hide there nuclear bombs over in Iran and now Iran has them.
35783
No, Iran should NOT have a nuclear weapon. They are dangerous actually VERY dangerous and people in Iran are stupid.
481215
iran doesn't have an atomic bomb...jesus christ\nthis American propoganda has really gotten to you all----Iran is far away from being able to get a bomb, and to this point they haven't violated any IAEA rules....stop accusing them----Iran has an insane president but the U.S. has an even insaner one and simply wants to invade countries......where are the WMD in iraq? i see a connection