Has anyone seen Baitbus?
415291
I was at a friends house and they where playing one of those episodes from a website. From what I glanced at it seemed a bit staged to me or at least the money was offered down the road before it all took place. I mean how many Guys that are getting a BJ would not take a sneak peak from under your sweatshirt someone put over your face to see the supposedly chick that is supposed to be giving the BJ and realize its a Guy at the end ? very doubtfully but I think the answer to your question is Yes and No .. yes some guys will do anything for money and some guys couldn't have a tin can to piss inn and wouldn't do it.. Maybe its morals judgment etc. ? Guess i don't really know the answer but over all i think its SOME would not ALL
294037
Yes, I've seen it.  In fact, it's on my hard drive.\n\nThough it has a few good merits, it's still is what it is.. \n\nA Conspiracy Theory.
32503
Hostel..and no I haven't seen it.  Unless I can find a sitter..I'll be waiting till it comes out on DVD.  :(  It really does look like a great movie tho!
1057181
Years ago, a British comedy act called Monty Python released a sketch (on an eclectic show called Monty Python's Flying Circus) called "spam, spam, spam". This skit involves a couple at a restaurant in which every meal seemed to contain spam. No matter what the poor couple tried to order, it was just repackaged spam.\n\nThis sketch was created well before the internet existed outside of a few computers connected together by phone lines. It was a bit prophetic, though, as the waitress in the sketch was just as annoying as email spam, and just as horrible to contemplate.\n\nWhen the internet first began, there was no such thing as spam. There was plenty of email, but none of it was of a commercial nature. You see, the internet began as a military and educational project. Making money had nothing to do with anything, so there was no reason to send out commercial mailings.\n\nProbably the first spam was written by an employee at Digital Equipment Corporation. It was intended to be sent to every email address on the ARPANET (which much later became the internet), but since space was limited the later names were truncated.\n\nOne of the first truly despicable spam messages came from a guy named Dave Rhodes. According to legend, he w as a college student who wrote an email advertising a pyramid scheme. This spam was not really an email message as it was posted to the Usenet (newsgroups) but the concept was the same. Lots and lots of people got to read an email advertising a silly scheme with a subject of "MAKE.MONEY.FAST!!". I'm sure that, just like today, may ignorant people responded and sent Dave their hard earned cash to purchase a fleeting dream.\n\nAs an interesting side note, it's very possible that "Dave Rhodes" never existed, at least not in 1986. The university which he supposedly attended has no record of this man. Since chain letters existed for years (way back into the 1970's) before, 1986 is very possibly the year in which someone simply typed one of these snail-mail letters into a computer and sent it off to the newsgroups.\n\nIn 1993, a man with the name of Richard Depew decided to introduce a concept known as retro-moderation. This would allow newsgroups to become a little bit more controlled, by having a moderator who would cancel postings after they had been made. While there were moderated newsgroups up to this point, Depew was suggesting moderating after the fact.\n\nDepew wrote a program to delete these postings. Unfortunately, it had a bug and write 200 messages to the news.admin.policy newsgroup. This annoyed a lot of people, who, for the first time, called the messages "spam". This is the first known time that this kind of thing was referred to as spam. (See "Origin of the term spam to mean net abuse" for the full story.)
665876
I hadn,t seen it before.\nbut thanks for the link
805664
urgh I hate it\nI saw one today \nit was the typical \n4 times a billion over 9 times the square of the atoms in a cherry or something\nits obvious it's a scam\nI've never ever seen anybody win and even If they did, I wouldn't be surprised if the b******s hung up on them before they could claim the cash.\n\nand the presenters- get some personalities!
1079323
This film is crap! Sorry but dont waste your money!  My friend (in the photo) went to see it and the whole film is based on just two people, the girl is all mouth - she keeps saying she is gonna castrate the fella - and just keeps threatening, its like "just bloody do it ok"!\n\nIts a ok film for a boring night in, but not worth a trip to the pictures.
960416
Nothing's wrong with shortbus, in fact it is good films that are different, but still cover relevant issues are released.  However it is contoversial and some would say not suitable for discussion on a family site!\nIf you were wanting to know about the ending here goes:\n\nSofia begins to go daily to a spa with an isolation chamber to meet Severin, and the two begin to have intense conversations. Severin begins to help Sofia loosen up sexually; Sofia helps Severin achieve a deeper human connection than she had experienced before. One evening at Shortbus the two have an unplanned sexual experience that causes strain on the friendship.\nThroughout the film we see that James has been making a film about himself. It turns out to be a sort of suicide note for Jamie, and James tries to take his life by taking pills and simultaneously drowning himself. He is rescued by Caleb, who takes him home. Caleb and James then have sex, and James is awakened to the good things he has in life when he sees how desperately Caleb has clung to them as a voyeur.\nUltimately Jamie and James appear to have decided to maintain a one-on-one relationship. Sofia finally achieves an orgasm while having a threesome with a couple at Shortbus. Caleb and Ceth wind up meeting and hitting it off, and Severin decides to stop being a sex worker to be an artist
57178
http://www.markarkleiman.com/archives/california_recall_/2003/12/bait_and_switch_in_california.php
734186
Hi B K, I've seen that movie at least "20" times, it's one of my favorites! It was easy for him to prove the "corruption"...he lived in that prison for 15+ years, and saw everything the Warden and his CO's did. As far as his "Mr. Stevens" goes, everything was legit. He sent away for "his" ID, Social Security card, opened several bank accounts etc...because he was smart and read the books in the library. Plus, he was a bank manager on the outside. He just played the Warden like a "fiddle". All the while, the Warden thought Andy was making deposits into his bank, when actually he was depositing some/most (?) not sure how much/when he would do that, into "Mr. Stevens" accounts. As for the poster being re-attached, my guess would be that he had some sort of tape/putty that he put on each corner. XOXO Moonpie...P.S. It's just my opinion! And, I loved it when he told "Red"..."I was a honest man on the outside, I had to go to prison...to learn how to become a criminal".
906015
well said uncle sid...I have never actually followed b.b. but I have watched bits of it and I would love to know where they get the morons from, seems to me..the more obnoxious and perverse you are the more you are a ' celebrity ' ??  : (   why...and this is entertainment !!   ANNNNDDDD....who the hell decided we Brits want to watch plastic comedy american trash along with the rest of the muck they show, americans have no sense of humour like ours ..now you've got me mad !!    lol
475531
one of those "straight to video movie's huh".  I'd like to rambo kick 50 cents @ss. The teletubbies can get teleskinny with chuck norris "home gym"  (hey where's christy brinkly). The knight rider goes on a covert operation to hunt down all of the members of the "care bare mafia" for their disgusting displays of cheerfullness.
473498
It is great.  \nMight I suggest looking for the opportunity to see Spamalot in NYNY.
334781
it is a very odd show.  What ever happened to just watching Seasemy Street?  I think those teletubbies are evil minions...Barney is harmless...a wirdo also with a nerdy voice, but harmless either way.  I just hope my kids don't pick up that goofy speach impedimant that Barney has...\n\nThey're making Cookie monster into a pansy also...he is now a Fruit Monster...he is supposed to go crazy over bannanas now instead of cookies.  What a joke!
336825
Not yet. But there is a stolen copy doing the rounds and it is on the net somewhere.\n\nIt is one movis that will make up crack up laughing. It's relly good
1149264
No i haven't seen it if you figure out what it is let me know! :)
714484
I saw the trailer for this and it looks really funny. I'm looking forward to buying the dvd, thanks! Trailers here: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0392908/trailers