prove of guilt george ryan?
402048
he was fuond guilty in court.
957991
HE IS  A PIECE OF GARBAGE !!! He did it and there is no doubt he did it...Hell his own brother who was ther at the time refuses to testify on his behalf......\n\nIf you want the truth about this case go to http://www.danielfaulkner.com/
117501
I have to agree with Anna.  Why would you hope for corruption in either party?  As a good american you would want what is best for this country.  You would hope that there would be no curruption with Libby.  I can sense the glee in your tone.  How evil is that? And what happened with "innocent until proven guilty"???? Or does that not apply to the republican party??
813423
Careful he may say guilty!
229252
The guilt must be proved. This is writted in the law. But it's true that some people are treated like they were so. There are intents to stop this.
451480
My understanding is that it is part of an ongoing offensive against corruption in Illinois. Ryan isn't the only person caught up in it. Mayor Daley's former patronage chief faces trial shortly along with three colleagues. My understanding is that it isn't related to capital punishment.
860322
In a recent courtroom drama, accused murderer Jack Merridew was almost attacked by fellow defendant Ralph Grant following his statement in the investigation surrounding the deaths on the island. (Nether) boys are in custody.\n\n(the) courtroom environment that had begun in silence erupted into a flurry of activity when Mr. Merridew provided details into the deaths of some of the boys which provoked an outburst by Mr. Grant. He got up from his seating screaming, “You’re such a liar!” His lawyer, Will Hayden, tried to calm him down. Mr. Grant flew out of his chair in a rage and could hardly be stopped. Running to the stand, intending to attack Mr. Merridew but being restrained by the police in time. \n\nsounds great to me! A worthy =)
1077510
Of course he got away with it.  No matter what happened, GW would have pardon the creep anyway.  I beleive that Karl Rove and Cheney were directly involved and should be tried for treason.
567682
I think some small percentage of people might, but ONE of the hardest things a person can do is to admit when they have made a mistake.\n\nEspecially if they have spent considerable time (months, years, etc.) defending their position and insisting they were right.\n\nAnd that applies to many things...not just George W.
262708
Does it even matter anymore?  He was found not guilty. I watched the trail and I would have given the same verdict if I was a juror.  \n\nForget about it and move on! \n\nThe Killa's not thinking about it!
934644
try reading ''unfit for command'' a nice little read exposing what a fraud kerry is and it is taken from actual stories from his fellow swift boat comrads during his tour... it paints a portrait of him having a  desire for getting medals under questionable circumstances, like getting a purple heart after tossing a grenade into a rice paddie and a piece of shrapnel put a small cut over his ankle... or rescuing a fellow comrad and saying his boat was involved in a hail of machine gunfire but since it was a freshly painted boat , they wondered why there wasnt any bullet marks at all on that boat.. once he touched american soil he ranted about the abuse his  fellow american soldiers were doing to the enemy and put all of the soldiers at risk... total sellout and a fraud.. oh by thr way george bush tried three times to fly combat in vietnam and was turned down because he didnt have the required flight hours... john kerry did not get shot several times in combat.. he served 4 months in a year tour but the media acts like he is a rambo with several tours of duty... he requested several times to leave vietnam early and he was granted his wish... dole, bush sr, reagan, all served duty in nam and bush jr did serve in the national guard..  good ole bill clinton is a draft dodger but the dems didnt want to talk about that when they ran against bob dole... when kerry ran against bush thats all they wanted to talk about and when he was called on his service duty he was exposed as a fraud and he was caught with his pants down and around his neck.. then they questioned the gall of anyone questioning his service in vietnam but didnt want to talk about it anymore and he didnt defend himself anymore except for the moron who ran around the country saying ''' john kerry saved my life'' like some broken record but he didnt reveal the details about his ''rescue'' and he went back in hiding and he is nowhere to be found...hmmmmm...
314023
You say you can prove that the politicians were involved- but why didn;t you use it in your trial so that you were not convicted??  If you are going to try and fight it now it's gonna be more difficult and you are going to need a great lawyer.  Be prepared to be riddiculed and harassed, amoung other things...\n\nYou need to make your evidence concrete- DO NOT USE CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE!!  Be prepared to fight and don't give up- take it to the higher courts.\n\nTry <www.wrongfulconvictions.com> it's a website that is based out of the University of Miami that run a wrongful convictions program- they investigate possible wrongful convictions and there are some great links on their site to other sources of information for you.
647498
Hi Swordfish,\nNo body read it so, folks are still being duped.\n-Ryan
672297
It doesnt matter, they have to do that, if they call them guilty, they can be sued for slander if he ends up being found innocent.  It can also taint witnesses that see the report, as it helps to establish guilt in their minds.
483490
can u prove it was signed under duress?
810197
You don't say who made this request to the Coucil and in what circumstances.  It sounds as though the Council is being gently prodded to think things through and perhaps withdraw an action to recover what is owed on the grounds that the person is somewhat deranged or mentally handicapped.  Those hearing the case can't say such a thing outright, but they can drop loud hints to the effect that if a person isn't in a fit mental state to deal with his financial affairs, it is perhaps not a good thing to bring him to court, especially if he is arguing with deep conviction that he doesn't understand why he is being prosecuted and doesn't feel he owes anything.  Maybe now that we are not allowed to use Latin in court, "moral culpability" is the new "mens rea".
1032630
Children of 6 years do not dare to ask such question in my place :)\n\nTurkey does not want to admit guilt. Admitting guilt may require to pay restitution, not to mention dented national pride.