What's the signifigance of the "JM" patch on the NJ Devils jerseys?
403463
It's for Dr. John McMullen (previous owner that passed away in 2005)\n\nCheck out this site:\n\nhttp://www.newjerseydevils.com/2005/html/theteam/teamnews/mcmullen-patch.php
942781
i cant find any thing about a patch but there is a lot of other stuff on ebay\n\nhttp://search.ebay.co.uk/search/search.dll?MfcISAPICommand=GetResult&ht=1&shortcut=0&from=R41&query=Tsunami+Bomb&category0=&Submit=Search\n\nsorry mate\nwhat about a t shirt\nhttp://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Tsunami-Bomb-Punk-Rock-Band-T-Shirt-skull-heart-L_W0QQitemZ160048690495QQihZ006QQcategoryZ307QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item160048690495
292512
here is an ebay search:\nhttp://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?cgiurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcgi.ebay.com%2Fws%2F&fkr=1&from=R8&satitle=gerry+mcnamara+jersey&category0=
591889
you can check on thesportsauthority where you can custom make your jerseys
841510
I have read about the Jersey Devil many times. It has been immortalized by the New Jersey Devils Hockey Team. \n\nThis is an enduring urban legend that could possibly have a basis in fact. It is within the realm of possibility that at one time, there really was a baby with terrible birth defects, possibly affecting the facial features, born among the settlers. These deformities could have been the common cleft palate or one of the more grotesque syndromes. To these illiterate and superstitious people, this child would certainly have been perceived as a child of the devil and most likely would have been treated with curiousity and fear, and shunned by the community. \n\nUnder these circumstances, the wonder is not that this child may have grown into a dysfunctional adult, but that it managed to reach adulthood at all. \n\nThis unhappy person could have lived in the wilderness, living off the land and avoiding the settlements, where he was likely feared and despised. \n\nAnyone encountering this unkempt and grotesque wild man in the woods could be forgiven for thinking that he had come face to face with the devil, himself. And when they died, this man got credit for it. He most likely received credit for every other calamity that happened to these people, as well. \n\nAnd if he died alone in the forest, his body would most likely not have been found. Therefore, legend states that he is still there, in the woods (or at least in the hockey arena). \n\nOn the other hand.. the devil himself may be camping out in the wilds of New Jersey.
1060655
I was rather fond of the old look. Maybe it's just nostalgia, but now that it's gone, I think it was pretty cool. I mean those were the colors they were when all the memories were made. HOWEVER, the more the team seperates themselves from the old Disney look, the better. The change will give the team more NHL credibility. You know, instead of being bashed for being the team named after a kid's a movie.  However, it's just not the same.\n\nI do agree with the earlier post. It DID remind me of the penguins. Is that a bad thing? I don' t know. The color scheme looks interesting, though. Instead of the scary Jason mask duckbill, now there is a webbed foot in the shape of a D. Is that a good thing? I don't know. I think the logo should have a cool symbol, like Boston, New Jersey, Detroit, or the neat looking Rangers Jersey. The word Ducks alone doesn't do it for me.\n\nAnyway, what I do appreciate is that the team listened to players and fans' input.
263454
If it's cheap, then it is not authentic. There are some at http://vikingmerchandise.com for $124.99, but they are for players that are doubtful to be with the team this season. If you want cheap jersey, look at the replica jerseys. At the same site, they are as low as $37.50.
418681
devils, new jersey... gag
1078572
real jerserys usual come with a sticker on it saying it's the real thing or they put the supporter logo on the bottom of the jersey like rebok, nike, etc..
680601
Tampa Bay Buccaneers, the pewter and crimson is awsome!! I is not boring like 'Shittsburgh, but not over the top like 'Limpver. Using the jolly roger on the helment improves on the Raider logo. As a Cowboy "fan"atic it pains me to say this, the Giants in the red jersey is TIGHT as an alternate uniform!!!
354202
Here's a shot:\n\nhttp://www.707sportscards.com/psa-cards/02143863.jpg
159503
It cuts down on the jersey from rubbing you raw
1015291
It's the pine tar players use for their bats for better grip...it gets on their helmets everytime they adjust it, take it on, take it off...some playesr likd vlady use the same helmet every year, game in and game out so it looks pretty nasty...like Trot Nixon of the red sox, and ozzie guillen used to do the same when he played
920568
LOL! :) haha, yeah one big huge decastar would be good. :) and when they get to 100 WCs, they can have this even bigger one in the middle of their jersey. :) \nlol, but thatd look weird, maybe on the back. :)
635242
I looked a little more about this for you and found this story about the pink jersey. Sorry it's kind of lengthy, but tells it all. Enjoy!\n\nThe Mystery of the Pink Jersey\n\nMike Laga amassed 423 career AB over the course of nine seasons between Detroit, St. Louis and San Francisco.  He had a .199 career average, and is probably best known for being the only player to have hit a baseball actually out of Busch Stadium (A foul ball left the park in September of 1986).  \n\nBut for me, Mike Laga will always be remembered for something else: The 1987 Topps card which depicts him wearing an airbrushed-pink jersey!  \n\nIn all my youth, the closest baseball cards came to perfection were those ’87 Topps.  Sure the early Upper Decks were nice; and I won’t sell the 1988-1989 and 1991-1992 Donruss sets short.  But those ’87 Topps had that special something: the perfect mix between action and posed photos.  The player-name box was tastefully understated.  The team logo was just the right size.  Many remember that set for the wood-grain frame that brought it all together.\n\nThe answer to the Mike Laga question has eluded me for years.  As a boy I wondered “why is Mike Laga wearing a pink jersey?”  Later it became “why would somebody at Topps airbrush a guy’s jersey pink?”\n\nMy first thought was that it might be an error card.  I hoped that something had happened when the film was being processed that botched the photo.  Error cards are worth a lot of money, right?  My 1981 Fleer Craig Nettles is an error card, and at one point it was worth $5.  $5!!!  I’ve got 800 of these Mike Laga cards, I might be rich!\n\nMy sister and I must have spent an entire summer trying to track down the 1988 Donruss Mark Grace rookie card; or the Fleer Billy Ripken with the dirty word on the knob of the bat.  I knew error cards were worth a lot of money (to a nine-year-old), and so when I saw that the ’87 Mike Laga was worth a mere $0.03, I quickly dismissed the notion that it was a true “error card.”  \n\nOne possibility is that Topps used a photo from Mike’s time in Detroit, although my first instinct is to reject this premise: the Tigers did utilize the three-band strip of elastic around the neckline, but the Tigers jerseys of 1986 buttoned-down (unless I am mistaken; admittedly I am not an authority on the history of Tigers uniforms).  The photo of Laga clearly indicates a jersey without buttons is being worn.  \n\nPlus, baseball card photos are traditionally taken during spring training, right?  Mike got dealt to St. Louis in 1986, so they could’ve easily snapped another photo of him during spring training of 1987; or they could have easily taken an action shot from the end of 1986.\n\nEven if this was a modified photo of Mike Laga in a Tigers jersey, it differed from what Topps would typically do for this situation.  For example, the 1988 Topps Doug DeCinces (card #446) features DeCinces in an Angels uniform having rounded second-base and possibly watching a play develop at third.  Across the top of the card the name “Angels” is spelled out in block letters, but in the lower-left corner of the card in 6 or 8 pt black type is written “Now with Cardinals.”  If the only thing that Topps had available for Mike Laga was a 1986 photo of him with the Tigers, why not simply note in the corner that he is “Now with Cardinals,” like they did for DeCinces?  \n\nI do know that card companies pay players for their photos (although in the 1980s it probably wasn’t much).  Did Topps not want to pony up an extra hundred bucks to pay Laga for a new photo?  If they felt that Mike was such a marginal player, why include him in the set at all?  In any event, the total costs of detailing a Mike Laga photo in 1987 probably far exceeded that of just paying him the $100 for a new photo.     \n\nAlthough the Mike Laga card is a mystery, it is not my favorite card in Topps set of 1987 (no disrespect to Mr. Laga).  My favorite was al
895031
The new jerseys are not in NHL 2007 and you wont be able to get them until NHL 2008 comes out. EA Sports sets a deadline each year for teams to submit changes (i.e. jerseys) in order for it to be included in the game. Sabres revealed their jerseys after the deadline.
249588
Here you go.\n\nhttp://www.mysimon.com/Apparel-and-Gear/9000-11034_8-0.html?sdcq=dnatrs-fg_apparel_and_hat_type_robes-chicago_skates/dflltrail-Robes~Chicago%20Skates