why doesn't the government release the video captured from nearby buildings surrounding the pentagon for 9/11?
401544
IT'S FISHY.\n\nBUT THIS IS THE COVERUP ADMINISTRATION.
942524
What are you talking about the official story you mean as reported by the media, they are only reporting what they see and told to report.   If you don't know that already then this is why you have doubts about everything. \n\nWe don't and cannot know everything, proven by further investigations days months years later.  You see people come forward and offer their own thoughts or recollections on the matter, some choose to further the thought or idea and controversy is born.  \n\nAll I know is that it was devastating not only for the US but for the world, this was the World Trade Centre, it was a blow not only to the US but to all the world and it was terrorism, and I refuse to believe any government in the free world would have any part in it and still be re-elected by its people.  If this is the case than we have already lost all that our forefathers faught for, liberty, freedom of speech, prosperity, everything is fake and we might as well be living as in the movie the Matrix.
1175030
I think it very convincing. I remember wondering why there was no exterior plane wreckage the day it happened. If it was a missile or a military plane the government would want to hush it up as it would be difficult to pin that on Islamic nationalists unless they had help. It is a bit like the anthrax attacks. One of the 9-11skyjackers was treated for an anthrax skin lesion, an extremely rare condition before 9-11. There was also a very direct link between one of the skyjackers and the first anthrax victim. His former landlord worked in the same building. Yet the government avoided investigating any links and tried to find a scapegoat.
826745
what i want to know is how did these hijackers infiltrate the pentagon and get them to turn of there defences . i is supposed  to be one of the most secure buildings in the world . there must have been more than one camera picking the pictures of the so called planes if i walk to my local shops i am picked by over 1 hundred cameras i live in a small town in England . it happened in Washington on of the most important city's in the whole world. its because American people a so gullible they can sell this lie to them. whats next.
753595
Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny. \n\nFAKE CONFESSION\nThe official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.\nhttp://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg\n\nEVIDENCE\nThere are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.\nhttp://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM\n\nHere is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=\n\nMolten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid.  Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.\nhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ\n\nFORENSICS\nA chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.\nhttp://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml\n\nCONFESSION \nWe also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329\n\nTESTIMONY\nThere is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon..."\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=\n \nThis video, obtained by a public interest group, shows the top rear fin of an air craft hiding behind a call box: Whatever is hiding back there, is under 48 ft. long, to small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 ft. long.\nhttp://www.clipaday.com/2006/05/pentagon_plane_crash_from_sept.html\n\nMOTIVE\nThe New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.\nhttp://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf\n\nOPPORTUNITY\nWitnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the a
165393
Claim: First is that there was NO plane found at or near the pentagon. \n\nFact: A disintegrated American Airlines Boeing 757-223 (N644AA) was found on the lawn and inside of the Pentagon.\n\nClaim: a janitor in the first tower who heard an explosion in the basement minutes before the plane hit.\n\nFact: Thousands of other people heard and saw the explosion come from over their heads. Video images show Boeing 767’s hitting both of the towers.\n\nClaim: Also, research was done on the flights, and most cross country flights are booked to capacity but those 4 that day (towers, pentagon, flight 93) were all booked to LESS than half capacity, as if they knew what was going to happen.\n\nFact: Load factors for American and United Airlines had been very low on all flights. They were already hemorrhaging money and United eventually went into bankruptcy. American is still losing their shirt. This was competition in action…not predestination.\n\nClaim: The pilots apparently weren't good and I think he said 1 or 2 didn't even have the pilot’s license.\n\nFact: The pilots (I assume you mean the terrorist pilots) had enough training to steer an airliner into a building. You don’t need to be much beyond a private pilot with some internet information available to be able to fly an airliner in a reckless manner into a large target. But you probably couldn’t do it twice.\n\nClaim: The article alluded that the government had a lot to do with (or planned attacks)... ran out of characters :-(\n\nFact: The government’s too big to keep a secret this big. Too many people have big mouths…and coordinating a mass suicide would not be something many people would agree to get involved with.
108448
This is one of those nutty conspiracy theories.  The satellite photo was takeng the day after the attacks.  It doesn't show much of anything that you can distiguish in any detail.  For all we know, they could have hauled debris away that might have hampered rescue efforts.  Who knows how much of the debris might be in the building?\n\nThe second photo was taken 3 days after the attacks.  Again, debris could have been removed to safety reaons, etc. And it isn't a vgood picture.  Debris could be in areas not shown on the photo like the courtyard area.\n\nThen of course there is the security tape showing the crash.  There is nothing new here, this is just someone who has too much time on their hands.\n\nAdded:\n\nYour question was "try this out and comment".  You posted a link to inconclusive photos that could be interpreted any number of ways.  You try to point to some vague conspiracy and a cover up with no supporting evidence.  How do you think people are supposed to react?  You ask where the wreckage is and I provide a number of plausible explanations that you chose not to ignore and not to analyze.
348183
I don't believe the official version of the 9/11.\nIf it was true why the government don't show us the videos of the plane crash at the Pentagon, Why the remains of the WTC were quickly destroyed, how can WTC 7 collapse with a small fire? Why the government and the EPA lied about the air quality surrounding the WTC after the collapse and putting the lives of hundreds if not thousands of men and women who were helping the recoveries in danger (most of them have health illness related to poor air quality these days)? Why the government can't give us the proper answers to these question. \nWhy can't we believe the government ? They lied for the war in Iraq, where's the WMD ? but at least we have remove the dictator.\n\nHere is one evidence of the collapse of the buildings were "pulled intentionally"\nA presentation made by professor Steven E. Jones.\nhttp://www.cerebellum.tv/fvideo/byu.php...\nThe power point slides\nhttp://www.checktheevidence.com/911/byus...\n\nEven in the 1960s the government were willing to create "terrorism" in order to attack cuba\nhttp://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf
1059519
First of all, the content of the website has not been authenticated.\n\nSecond, previous "terrorist claims" coming from so called  "Islamic" sites were traced back to western countries, such as those bragging about the Nick Berg beheading, which again raised much controversy regarding the authenticity of the video, its content, origin and those who carried out such a vile act.\n\nPlease check the archives in the following site: www.whatreallyhappened.com  and may know the truth
747180
concidering how our govenment couldnt even prevent 9/11 from happening or FIND Bin Laden, trust me, the govenment isnt as capable as they WANT you to think they are. Theyd rather control thru fear and misinformation.
71520
Absolutely! Look at the pentagon! Anyone with half a brain that watched the live CNN coverage of the hole can see... the hold was 15 feet, the plane was 44 tall, there were no wings on the lawn, yet the hole was 15 feet... catch my drift? The hole wasn't big enough to fit that plane. Yes, it is sad that so many people died, what makes it even more sad is that are government is likely to have taken a part in the losses of our own lives. Couldn't imagine what they could have used such an even for....hint hint... Patriot Act... hint hint...
1112224
There is NO DOUBT in my mind that the US government was behind it! Who benefited MOST from it. Bush got his war, the "Military Industrial Complex" is making hundreds of BILLIONS, Osama got away with it and is a martar to his followers. \n\nSome people will never believe no matter what the facts show. The same kinds of tactics have been used for hundreds of years. The German people didn't believe it in the 1930s & 40s either, and many still don't. But it happened.\n\nCalling people "conspiracy nuts" for entertaining the idea of OUR government being corrupt, doesn't change the fact that it ALWAYS has been. Some folks just refuse to consider such things. \n\nDoubters explain this: \n\nHow is it that burning jet fuel does NOT burn hot enough to melt steel, yet that is the "Official" explaination for the collapses of all 3 WTC buildings?\n\nWhy did the towers fall STRAIGHT DOWN? Physics would dictate that if the top was too heavy for the damaged area, it would have fallen to one side. \n\nWhy were police and firemen quoted as saying they witnessed multiple explosions in several locations (including in the basement) many far from the impact area. One so large it was measured on a reichter scale nearly 100 miles away.\n\nWhy did WTC building 7 go down? It was not hit and sustained very little damage from a fire in a small area of one floor.\n\nWhy did the owner of the buildings tell the FDNY to "pull" the building? It takes weeks to prep a building for demolition, yet they had it wired with explosives and leveled by 8 pm on september 11th.\n\nThese are the ONLY modern high rise building IN HISTORY to be brought down by fire!\n\nSo before discounting it offhand, at least try to answer the questions being raised.
1167567
Is the story really true about the hotel and gas station?  Did they really have a video of what happened and did the FBI really come in and conviscate the videos?  I would like to meet the person who investigated all that to see if it is true.  You would think that someone took some video shots of what happened at the pentagon.    The object in that video doesn't even look like a huge jet liner.   The little hole in the Pentagon was not produced by a jetliner where are the jet engine holes in the wall?  If there are any video footage it will been tainted after the Gov. finishes with it. will the world ever know what really happened on 911?     Bush doesn't seem to be too concerned about Bin Laden, He even said so himself on National TV.   They aren't really looking for him.   If they were they would have found him.  There are too many people in this world that would love some reward money to tell us where he is.  Somebody knows out there\n\nhey rocknroll5  if they have all been released, where do you view them?
327154
I've been doing my own research for a long time now.  As far as "asking questions that can't be proven"...every question I bring up indeed COULD be proven if the evidence were not destroyed.  Almost EVERYTHING related to what would amount to a fair forensic investigation as to the causes, circumstances, and material evidence of 9/11 has been thoroughly destroyed or completely sealed to the public.\n\nThink about that.  The largest mass-murder in US history and there is NO forensic evidence to be had by the public or independant investigators.  All scrap material from the WTC was carted off and sold to India as scrap without any examination.  Wreckage from all flights met with the same fate, except what little independant photographers gathered, which is compelling for the fact that the engines recovered were the wrong model in 3 out of 4 cases.  Four thousand witness statements have been sealed (4000!) and any first-hand witness that discredits the official story have been debunked as either un-patriotic or crazy.  FAA records and the clearest security video photage have either been destroyed or sealed.\n\nCongress authorized a total of $11 million to investigate the events of 9/11, but almost no money made it to investigators.  In comparison, Bill Clinton's bj merited $40 million in funds to investigate.  Money well spent?  Let me re-phrase that...$40,000,000 on an act of marital impropriety for one man and $3666 per murder of another.\n\nTo top it all off, the few FBI investigators assigned to this ALL have blown the whistle to say that they were given no resources to investigate, were stopped cold by orders from above when investigating certain avenues, and were told to lie on their final reports or the reports were changed/edited after they were filed.\n\nPropogandists count on a person to overcome logic with emotion, and in 9/11 they have succeeded admirably.  Anyone (including 8 years myself) who has been in the military will tell you they have been lied to more than once to achieve some "motivation".  There isn't much need in government culture to cover up anything, just a "don't ask questions and don't talk to the press" attitude, most people like to keep their retirement pension.  This video is just the tip of a VERY big iceberg.
275439
Now this is crazy! The government valued each person that died in the towers individually. So that lead to another lawsuit, which hasn't been settled yet. You can find articles on this at PBS Frontline and Nova. Good luck!
1160864
lucky2bealive, I don't want to disagree with you but I don't believe you are going to find anywhere in the historical records that Bin Laden claimed responsibility for the 9/11 bombings. What he has done is praise the matyrs of that event. However, there would be more clarity and the issue can be put to bed finally if the government gave us the names of all the people that died in the various events. Where are the planes that crashed? Do you really believe that a building like the Pentagon would have cameras that are intermittent and take pictures every 7/8 seconds. Come.. Come. We are talking about the most technologically advanced country in the world. Something smells fishy and the stench cannot be dispersed until the Government come clean. Have you ever seen reports of the examination of  the so called crash sites?
602875
Good question. I strongly believe that our dear government knows where he is. Why haven't they caught him? Perhaps because it is to the US interest that he is not caught yet. The US govt always knows everything, but at times they pretend like they don't, so that they may allow their enemies on act on something so that the US can censor people, use documents like the Patriot Act and who knows, perhaps a National Marshall Law. Govts are shaddy.