poor demarcation of buildings?
410900
yes but just a little bit of paint
1113037
your layout might have it to where they dont show up on purpose. either change your layout or find it in the codes some where so you can take it out
878309
Diamond-Square is a great height-map generation algorithm. It's kind of cool that something that simple could create realistic landscapes.
630158
Since you don't want to subdivide (subdivision with chi-square is perfectly valid BTW) you could try a Tukey's HSD. However if you are doing this by hand it will probably be faster to subdivide.
663345
I don't think there is an easy answer to the Alexandia Cornice problem.\n\nSorry.
917923
Try google earth. I don't know how recents the images are....
678118
maybe you look at the wrong places???
389321
Some of the inframes don't appear to be working. Looks like it could be an OK site once it's working though.
686425
The answer to negative spaceis ::::\n\nArchitects sometimes refer to " negative space" as important in creating a desired effect- an area devoid of architectural details can enhance a larger effect.
651802
The two "triangles" are not exact triangles, but rather are quadrilaterals.  The error in representation actually adds up to be one unit.  I have done the caculations in AutoCAD, and it turns out to be one square unit missing causing the extra space.
798812
Yes its the area...say of the parking lot.  This is the Rational Method.  It looks alot like darcy's law.  It is very simple and easy to use.  However, for undeveloped areas....forested, grass...try the SCS Method.  It is a little more complicated but produces better results.
183743
No straight answer to this one. It depends 'exactly' what you define as a building, and whether you count masts and aerials that are on the top blah blah blah.\nHave a look here though for more information::
1008897
try using a jpeg or png.  and reimport it inot your library.  Also when you convert it to a symbol make sure not to move the center achor point.
604223
Most likely, but check with your building inspector.  You may want to do that anonymously, if you get my drift.
190267
Any of the skyscrapers - Empire State Buildin, Sears Tower - would be fine, since they're also very blocky. For a greater challenge, you might even try the Pentagon, since it is a regular pentagon in structure.\n\nYou might start off with the Washington Monument, since it's nearly 1-dimensional (because it's so much taller than wide or deep).\n\nI'm American, of course, so I think mostly in those boundaries - I'm sure there are buildings in other countries that work, too.
335563
Hey, I just did a quick search for New York City Architecture and found this web site.\nhttp://www.greatgridlock.net/NYC_Images/imgalpha.html\n\nWhen you go there scroll down and they have the building in alphabetical order with the dates that they were built in parentheses next to them.  Look for the dates in your time period.  There are a few.  You will get an idea of what buildings were around then.
771669
Cause squares would look weird