how do you think is the best nash or t mac?
406702
Don't really understand your question. If your asking who is better, that questionis unanswerable. They are completely different players. Nash is a point guard. His job is to dish the ball and to be the leader on the floor, almost like an extension of his coach. TMac is a scorer. His job, basically, is to score and rebound. If you like at their track records, it is arguable that Nash is a greater asset to his team. He has taken his team furtehr into the playoffs than TMac. Also, TMac always seems to get hurt. Nash is always reliable, and he's white.
503623
Nash is freaking greattt. but Jordan shot the ball that often cause he was consistent.  You're a ball hog when you shoot like crazy but can't score.  they moved the ball into Jordan's hands cause they knew he could knock down the points.  \n\nDont knock him for setting a high standard.  You can think highly of players, but give him his due respect!
365821
Nash, for his leadership skills.\n\nThe Suns have lost 3 starters, one being perhaps their best player, Amare Stoudemire. Despite the lack of a dominating interior pressense, Nash has been able to keep this team together.\n\nNASH for MVP!!!!
579614
How about Nash/Barbosa against Terry/Harris\n\nThat should be fun
6276
Kobe is.  Please note i am not a Kobe fan, just a realest\n\nKobe:  32.7 points / g, 5.4 reb / g, 4.4 Asst. / g.\n\nT-Mac: 23.9 points / g, 7.2 reb / g, 5.4 asst / g
617221
PHOENIX\nAS LONG AS NASH IS PLAYIN WELL
479356
Sure why not. T-mac isn't even playing and the 3 you're getting are all awesome.
1026964
If your talking abut floor generals, then yes he is the one of the best along with Nash.\nIf your talking about all the leaders in the NBA, head coaches included. HELL NO
532090
I'm not the most proficient Mac user but if your looking for basic fulfillment of your needs then a Mac Mini or the basic iMac will fit the bill. I'd go with the iMac personally. but for the best quality and efficiency the Power Mac G5 is the best choice.\n\nHowever, now that Intel is starting to create better processors that aren't just faster but are more reliable and windows has a Media Center Spec. O/S, I would seriously look into an Intel OR AMD based media center PC.\n\nThe macs I mentioned go for between $600-$1300 (USD)\n\nAnd the Intel's, depending on Configuration, can go anywhere from $700-$1500 (USD) for a decent configuration.\n\nPersonally I choose Windows over Mac because for components within a computer it is much more compatible. the Apple O/S stalemates you to just a few options that can limit productivity. but it can really fall on personal preference.\n\nMy second source will bring you to a very good PC that is based on an Intel chip set and can run Windows Media Center 2005. it goes for $690 (USD) not including tax and shipping and handling.
158754
Hmmmmm.....they're fairly even. Pierce has been a slightly better scorer, but that's only because T-Mac didn't get a lot of playing time in his Toronto years - over the last 5-6 seasons, T-Mac has the edge. T-Mac has a better assist-to-turnover ratio and a few more blocks, while Pierce has been healthier and has more steals. They're comparable field goal shooters, but Pierce is a bit better from long-range and the free throw line, though he commits more fouls.\n\nThe statistical edge goes to T-Mac. I love my Kansas players, but I have to give credit where credit is due.
1157037
probably tom's best friend. maybe look at tom's top 8 or something
342228
Steve Nash is still leading in the MVP votes.  He might not have stellar stats, but he carries the team.  Sun would not have this kind of records without Nash this year.  It's all about the team, not individual.\n\nThink about this - if you play with Steve Nash, suddenly you are a star (look House, Diaw...).  If you play with Kobe, you suck.  And Kobe would keep blaming on you.\n\nLebron James is also good, but some coaches and analysts still think he doesn't create enough open shots for teammates.  Just FYI.
523390
only tonight thank god\n\ngo suns!\n\nsteve nash for mvp!
220669
Yes, Kobe Byrant is the best. Don't hate on him. Ya'll some lames why ya'll hating. he cold and ya'll know it
567767
I say Kobe whether you're comparing him to T-Mac or anyone else currently in the NBA. I'll assume that you were comparing him to McGrady, so I'll work with that. I feel that McGrady is a more fluid scorer. He just makes it look so easy. Obviously, Kobe is a great scorer, also, but Kobe has to work much harder to get his points. McGrady scores so easily that it looks like he's not even trying sometimes. Kobe is always stutter-stepping, crossing over, spinning, pump faking, basically always working hard to get a shot off. I think T-Mac's height, length, and better jumper give him a more clear advantage over most of his defenders. Overall though, Kobe has a huge advantage. McGrady isn't much of a defender. He has the ability, but doesn't seem to have the desire to defend. For anyone that calls Kobe a ball hog, but praises McGrady for "team" play. Kobe's career assist average is higher than McGrady's. Before you say "it's b/c he had Shaq", Kobe averaged 6.0 assists in his first season w/o Shaq, while T-Mac averaged 5.7 assists in his first season with Yao. Kobe's all-around game is superior to McGrady's. When I think of team play, I factor in defense as a major factor. So, I think Kobe is the better player.
1009563
Nash\nHamilton\nPrince\nDuncan\nDiop
991270
I've had a Dell.  They are good but then I was converted to a Mac.  Seriously, they may cost a bit more but are soooo easy to use and have none of the problems pc's have.  A lot of fun, too.  Check 'em out.  I have the iBook G4.