Is it ok to have kids under 10 in jail??
401169
if they are visiting someone then I believe it would be OK but  I wouldn't force them to go let them do it on their own consent.
204827
Children are the only thing that's sacred remaining in this world. People who hurt kids should be punished severely. Yes, that is an excellent idea, in my opinion- to sterilize criminals who have harmed innocent kids (every kid is innocent, because they are defenseless against larger adults). If they are prevented from having any other kids, that would help give at least some degree of assurance that they wouldn't fall into recidivism. But on the other hand, measures might need to be taken to prevent any offender from adopting other children, and measures to prevent an offender from working around kids, too. Prison time would also be a good idea- and sterilization. If the individual ever got out of jail, then they would not have any immediate children to harm.
240213
I don't think so. Jail is jail. No matter where they jail. They have no freedom. They will meet the same problem inside the prison such as bullying, pressuring ,fighting ,raping among the criminals. Not happy at all.
950338
Do you mean, if you're just a little bit over the age limit and she's just a little bit under is it then only a little bit illegal?\n\nSorry - the law doesn't really work like that.  If she's under age, she's jail-bait, whether you're 18 or 80.\n\n.
71973
well, almost certainly you would need to call your local police or sherriff's office, if you want to report her for a crime.. or the state family services board, if you want to help the children..  but i can't tell you how to do that since i don't know where you live.\n\nsorry!  guess they're doomed to a life of hardship and despair.
332933
I reported a man who kids use to come to my place of work and tell me mommy and daddy make us do all kinds of sexual things,it was all done in secrect,but,they took the kids away and the grandparents have custody and he got 7 months in prison,she was ordered to stay away from the kids!sometimes,speak up to help these poor children,I do,it breaks my heart!The police interviewed the children and both parents where taken in,I still don't understand why she didn't get any time coz she also has aids and probably gave it to her 2 kids!so sad!I pray for them every night!Young children don't know how to make these things up and that was enough to get him arrested and have the children taken away!
607877
I'm pretty sure most district courts have programs for problem kids.  I'd either inquire with the court for your area, or check with your local police department.
913302
Yes it is the law in the UK.  You cannot let a child leave (unless to an adult guardian) before the age of 16 and neither can they leave of their own free will. The police will return them to home xx
529406
Yes. They will put you in jail and take the 16 year old to a foster home.
163360
So you're absolutely clear on this, there is no legal age in California to be leaving kids alone.  \n\nHowever, and as other posters have mentioned, there are a number of child abuse and neglect laws that can come into play here, and they can result in nearly anything from hefty fines to years in prison.  \n\nIf you know your kids, and trust them to be able to take care of themselves, it's your call.  Of course, it would be good if someone knew you and trusted you to make the right decision about your kids, but that's kind of also left to you.\n\nI have a 15 year old daughter who I would (and do) leave at home, sometimes all day.  I would not do it overnight, both because she doesn't want to, and because I would worry.  I would have left her home at 14...and sometimes at 13....but much younger than that, and I wouldn't have left her home for very long.  \n\nIt really depends on your kid(s), but there is no specific law that says how old a kid has to be.
658581
i dont think its your problem man. i know he's your kid and you're concerned for him, but if he's 30 and cant get his crap straight, i dont know what you can really do for him. he's going to need to be willing to start at the bottom. like, rock bottom, working at wendy's or something. but, thats better than going back to jail.
79817
There is no real minimum in most states, at least that I'm aware of, but there could be in some. The real question isn't how old the babysitter, but whether or not the parent is endangering the child by leaving them with the babysitter. A 9 year old could be completely competent to babysit, especially if she was aware of what to do in an emergency, but if something happened to the child she was watching, there could definitely be charges of child negelct/endangerment against the parents.
415477
Until they are of a certain age yes.  I think the child has to be 13 and then they are old enough to make the choice of wether they want to go or not, but either way, it will have to go through court to be done properly.
617538
For the best answer, you should check with your  local police department, or child welfare office. It may vary by state. I believe it is 12, but you should also be aware of the child's maturity and capability.
810029
Only if your in jail (sometimes)
311810
Hi, I'm from Carolina, and I'm not sure if there is a law for that what you asked. I think common sense plays more a part than anything. I think it is safe when a child reaches 10-12 years old. Of course there are 10-12 year olds who are dependable, and some that are not, I think it depends on your kids. I know of a 12 year old who was in daycare because his mom couldn't trust him enough to stay at home and not burn down the house, or let strangers in while she worked. Generally around that age, they should be able to stay home by themselves until a first shift working parent(s) come home for the evening. Most of the time the child is only there for 2-3 hours alone before an adult get s there, which is not bad. As a child with both parents working, I remember staying there for an hour and a half until my mother got off work. We walked home from school, me,my brother and my little sister. My bro was the oldest at  10, I was 8 and lil' sis was 5 or 6. We were good kids and me and lil' sis listened to our bro. We would not answer the phone, go outside, cook anything, or watch t.v (until homework was done) no tv until homework was done. He would threaten to tell if we didn't listen to him, and we did since he was the oldest and in charge. I am 28 now, and I'm still alive and well. That is my point. It depends on your kids! My bro was responsible at 10 years old, so my folks knew they could trust him to watch over his baby sisters!
669378
I think any child that commits an 'adult' crime should be tried as an adult. He is certainly old enough to know the difference between right and wrong.......... blimey, my kids are 9 and 8 and they have known the difference for years!!\nIf we were harder on the younger ones, as they get older hopefully they will grow into better people. After the age of 16 I think it is too late to change them.\n\nChildren know these days what the age limits are and I have seen that younger ones are pushing it to the limits because they know they won't get punished for it. Don't always blame the parents, it isn't always their fault. They didn't tell their children to commit crime (unless they are twisted) so any child that does so should face the consequences of their actions!!