what should the penalty be if someone caused a toxic spill give 5 reasons for yur response?
405775
There should be no criminal penalty, but the person should be liable in tort (i.e. they should be able to be sued).  \n1) By imposing criminal penalties (jail time, fines) the government removes money that could be used to compensate victims. (Thus removing double-punishment)\n2) By imposing criminal penalties (jail time, fines) the government removes money that could go to clean-up.\n3) By still imposing penalties in tort you would allow for victims to be compensated for injury. \n4) By limiting the damages to the tort law companies would be able to avoid hold-out problems. (You operate a factory that spills toxic gas into the air, to stop the spilling you would need to stop your factory so it is better to compensate all the victims without worrying that one of them will "hold-out" and ask for more money). \n5) This penalty system will anger the environmentalist (always a good thing) and your teacher (and you deserve as much for not doing your own homework)
473034
1) Don't do it again\n2) Tell them that it was an emergency\nor\n   Tell them that they are a client
875271
First drugs are illegal so a punishment goes there.\nUnder the use of drugs an act of crime occurs, may not have if accused was clean.\nConsider priors he/she may have.\nThen put together a jail term and a drug rehab program.\nI would suggest  a 3 to 5 year  sentence and less time for good behavior.  \nYes you are right about a killing being less time. That really stinks.
134555
This all comes down to human performance.  The cast of likely culprits would be in the 100's.  Ultimately, if you want to be  a hard nose about it, it was the fault of the shift reactor operator at the time that it happened.  That would only be because his license was the "One" that was allowing the plant to be operated at that moment.  The utility is responsible along with the operator for all consequences of operating the plant.
779927
This is my oppionion:\nPut it in this type of format.\nfirst part \nSituation : I was fired due to blah blah (whatever happened)\nForm (don't write that just giving you an idea) Write down exactly what happened and why you responded the way you did...and with your apologizes or whatever (even if you don't feel that way) for creating any upset with the company...why you like the company etc..\nAt the bottom next paragraph put how long you have worked there...how you have done or whatever on your job and why you are an asset to the company...and that it will never happen again.\n\nGet it? gosh sorry that happened....sounds like they were a bit tough on both of you really....you should have at least gotten a warning or something :(\nHope this helps! :) good luck xxxooo\nHey worse case You will find another job that knows your worth.
930132
1)The damage caused by the petro chemica smog.\n2)The human tragedy that strike at the lives of the people like the Bhopal gas tragedy too grave to be compensated by money.\n3)Urban poverty.\n4)The evils of industrilisation were well recognised even by the intellectuals of the 19th Century, like Ruskin, Arnold &Carlyle. It destroys the family of the industrial workers and their soul.
345014
Contact the EPA. They are a government entity. They have folks who can answer these kinds of questions for you.
1133455
Probably a violent/illegal substance/sex crime or any felony. Then again this is Oregon we're talking about.
310259
It was a environmental disaster, probably the worst ever caused by an oil spill. Thousands of animals died including sea birds, otters, seals, bald eagles, orcas, salmon, and herring. Also, there was severe ocean and soil oil contamination.
201032
how can you say it should increase if you dont even know what the penalty is reserch first the make a statement or atleast have some common knowledge on the subject
1082365
Ask for a dismissal, but you'll need a good reason!
466768
Any grease fires. And you shouldnt rush to putting out a chemical fire with water unless you know what it is.
1110435
The best way is give people an incentive not to pollute. Whether you like it or not most people an inherently selfish. If you give them a reason not to pollute (such as a % of the profits from fishing) they will be far less likely to dump into it.
474801
Consult the clerk of the court where the violation occured. You may have to pay a fee for the info.
424215
Less than 10 grams is not very specific.... 9 grams, for example, is not something deemed for "personal" use.... that is intent to distribute\n\nI am not sure of the max penalty, just that it is not high enough if the person ever gets out
53021
I think it would depend on what the complaint is about. But this should help.\n\nhttp://www.sc.gov/HowDoI/MakeAComplaint.htm
2542
Working in environmental analytics, pollution situations are a common experience. One of the most common occurrances of pollution is sullage or liquid manure in surface waters, absolutely deadly for all life forms requiring oxygen from the water, and poisonous for plants in high concentrations, too.\n\nPollution can be quite natural...