I want to know some thing about Dellism (like Fordism or Toyotism)?
407357
Dellism is a production paradigm prevalent in recent years. It involves creating a widespread fan base for inexpensive computers. Then once the fan base is established you outsource your technical support to Bangalore, India where wait times for help skyrocket as you are bounced from one incompetent individual to the next. After that you attempt to get individuals buying warranties to to pay extra for faster service to keep from waiting an hour. Then you sit and watch as your consumer base is stolen by companies such as HP and Alienware that still value customer service over trying to increase already huge profits.
193749
go to\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianism
418573
This will be helpful\n\nhttp://www.dism.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=22&Itemid=10
33218
So far it is, the problem with it is that it's evil.  Why is it evil?  capitalism thrives on excess.  Which means that it makes more than neccesary, thus putting strains on natural resources and trying to squeeze as much work out of your workforce with for as little money as possible is another thing that goes along with capitalism.  Consumerism is the offical religion of capitalism.  The practicioners are labeled consumers and the preachers (marketers) push consumption more and more to make it more and more successful.\n\n  I'm doing my best to come up with another one.  So far, my best one is integrating robots in the workforce and after that people then work at being the best people they can be, like the ideal society those long dead philosophers talked about.\n\nBasically, in the system, the majority of the labor will be performed by robots leaving people to do just what they'd like to.  (possibly) The govt would ration everything kinda like communism, but the robots would produce a slight excess kinda like capitalism.  One thing I see the need for is a reduction of the human population to take the stress off our resources.  With robots doing all the work,  there's no worry about who's gonna support our pensions etc.  because the workforce is always adequate.  So after reaching an ideal population, having enough robots to perform the labor we dont want to, then rationing off the resources in some manner, we'll finally be free to not only pursue our own interest, but we'll also not have to go find poorer countries to go outsource anything to which will hopefully mean no more recessions!\n\nHere's some variables, families own robots, they pay maintaince and they repair the robots, that's their job, and they get the revenue the robots make for whatever company.\n\nYou'd have to call these robots something else so you could define them from the other ones.\n\nAnyways, I should work on this idea more, but I hope we can make it possible.\n\nI'm also gonna work on other new govt ideas.
567356
See Rousseau and women in\nhttp://cal.csusb.edu/Faculty/Philosophy/moody/314f04%20rousseau_and_women.htm
271525
You should try reading "Flesh and Machines" by Rodney Brooks.  He does a nice cursory overview of the history of robotics and the implications on society of their existence.
37623
Read Plato's Republic, Edmund Burcke, Machevelli's The Prince, John Locke's Two Treaties on Government,  histories on all the great societies of the world's history, and The rise and fall of Rome.\n\nThis gives you a good idea of what works and what doesn't
603101
Go here, plenty to read on them...\nhttp://www.rickross.com/groups/krishna.html
1172258
http://www.chomsky.info/
1131779
communalism is something else but you probably mean 'communism'\n\nWell in the Marxist theory, communism was regarded an 'ideal'  realm of society in which everyone would contribute as they could and receive as they need. (Any earlier stage couldn't be regarded as Communism)\n\nSocialism was a transitory stage on the way to communism.\n\nLater on the terminology used in the Marxist theory was rather blurred and confused as Stalin declared the USSR had to head for 'socailism in one country' (as opposed to universal revolution rhetoric) and; the term 'communist' in the names of the leading parties in the Eastern bloc turned out to be the names of the concurrent regimes in those countries at that time.
693701
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feudalism\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feudal_society
984127
Since you're obviously new to the game of rhetorical slandering, I'll go easy this time and offer a bit of advice:\n\nExamine closely which party most resembles the  Marxist doctrine, and try again.\n\n\nFozzy: if I could give thumbs up, I'd give you one.\nnice lesson.
839382
Greed, Slothfulness, Pride, Envy, Jealousy, Lust and Gluttony\n\nI don't know what Dogmatism means.
774474
According to wikipedia:\n\nCommunism is an ideology that seeks to establish a classless, stateless social organization, based upon common ownership of the means of production.  It can be classified as a branch of the broader socialist movement.\n\nSocialism refers to a broad array of doctrines or political movements that envisage a socio-economic system in which property and the distribution of wealth are subject to social control.  This control may be either direct—exercised through popular collectives such as workers' councils—or it may be indirect—exercised on behalf of the people by the state.
1110680
An awesome book that will show you the difference is Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand.  It's a long read but you will definately get it by the end of the book.\n\nIn short:\n\nCapitalism: "Every person for themselves."  You choose how to earn your money and choose how to spend it.  You have the freedom to control your finances and make whatever decisions you want with it.  Most people in America choose to spend it on junk and then blame other people when they are not successful.  That is because they do not have personal accountability or responsibility.  For the rare ones that do, there are no limits.\n\nCommunism: Government controls everything.  Everybody makes the same amount of money at every job.  Literally a doctor will make as much as a burger flipper at a restaurant.  The government controls the price of everything from your rent to food to gas to television.  No freedom in how you can earn and spend your money.  Limits to what you can do success-wise is determined by the government.  This is usually what the liberals in America strive for as it is "equality" and "fair."  It also destroys what makes Capitalism great.
863157
Check out Politics1.  http://www.politics1.com\nThey have a lot of information on political parties.\nBut off the top of my head,\nRepublican\nDemocratic\nSocialist\nGreen\nLibertarian\nConstitution\nand\nReform (although they are almost defunct now).
803050
like this :\nhttp://www.chiots-france.com/Trouver-votre-chiot/Cao%20Fila%20de%20Sao%20Miguel-1.jpg