Who agrees that men were only put on Earth for the obvious because they can't do much else right?
412570
I can't say I agree.....but it's funny how many women articulately defended the men, and how many men got their undies in a bundle about it!
930625
Very true man only follows the laws of god when they are convenient.
540421
I think it's because it was mostly men who were in control of  nearly everything in the past. It was men who worked, voted, drove, and etc. I'm sure that when "God" was first acknowledged or came into existence, it was probably men who preached and wrote about "God" and they could only relate to a "God" that mirrored them in some manner. And because women were once considered weak, how could someone or something as powerful as"God" be female? \n\nI also agree with what you said about language constraints.
689489
i dont think we have a choice because all men do it
266907
Well it boils down to this...\n\nThey have what men want, and they will do what they want, and we'll like it or we won't get any booty.
1126317
Depends on the circumstance, Sometimes yes. Unfortunately sometimes we men think with our smaller heads.
130211
Because they only think of themselves and their needs and desires. Men are selfish bast*rds.
967211
You are absolutely RIGHT!!!\n\nHowever, if we want a real change, we are the ones who have to take the first step.  Men behave the way they do because we let them.
606077
Actually, there have been a number of scientific studies (usually based on sailors stranded on deserted islands for long periods of time) that show that men by themselves usually do not really compete with each other if the society is only men with no prospect for women or outside interference of any kind, but instead are usually very cooperative. It is only when women are added into the mix that things start to get messed up. A perfect example is with the mutineers on the HMS Bounty. There were a bunch of guys who were getting along fine, then one of the mutineer's had his woman die on him and he decided someone had to give him another one. Within a few days all but one of them was dead.\n\nThis isn't meant to be chauvinistic, this is just what I have read several times in different sources over the years.
662216
interesting question can we yes do we want to well thats just the problem isnt it.In order for there to be peace things must be fair and not just fair but equal.All men are not created equal as one might want to believe.some stronger some smarter some healther some with more drive to succeed and a multitude of needs to be met based on education and experiance and ability.If we take all these things into consideration meeting the needs of people becomes of primary importance and is a goal worth achieving . do super achievers have a responcibilty to under acheivers does some one who uses drugs and is lazy deserve as much as this person and what is the balance we wish to achieve in order to maintain a standard of living no one should fall under even if we must care intirely for them. If people would worrie less about what others do and only do there best with the talents given them by the gene pool they are part of then peace is very possible.simple rules of behaveuor for the well being of all people need to be established.cause no harm to others or the enviroment would be a good start and a court of justice not judgement to determine a reasonable sentence.reality is hard but fair, accidents happen but not that often and some one is usally responcible.work is for the good of all men and a position of respect to be valued by society not an employer people often place there desires above those of others and should be reconed with as a crime under do no harm .we can all share in the vast wealth of planet earth if man only respects his fellow man and doesnt take advantage of him.man needs changeing work to keep his mind active and stimulate learning which only enhances his life and those around him.your reward for great acheivment should be acknowledgement by those who benifit from your ability and shared with the world.good work should be rewarded with time off for family not huge pay checks.and more hours worked supporting those who hired you.restructure of laborand management needs to be along the lines of teaching working side by side the knowledge shared is expaned 10 fold throught the world and all benifit.you cant solve a problem by tossing money at it but creating a sence of need to fufill a need gives man the reward and satisfation of helping others.jobs with low skill levels that require simple instruction yet hard physical work should be rewarded equally as if they invented scotch tape peoplewho show a lazy streak may be great thinkers unable to concentrate on simple tasks or will ing to do them no matter there role in the community can be fufilled with community projects of shot duration with long term benifits .you build a road may be all thats need for awhile great numbers benifit from hard work on common projects.If i am rich and provide all the money to finance a deal should i be rewarded or scolded for hoarding and not sharing.baseing your worth on money is of little value its only a simple minded way of keeping score in a game set up with rules that are not equal at its inception .man is capable of peace but i dont think willing he is to greedy in his nature still and may be for 100"s of years to come.
322710
... Male ego & pride....They say that all men are nothing more than children deep inside... I can't argue with that - most of them sure act like one.\n Damn men !!! Can't live with them... can't make them ask for directions...
906035
We all live in our society... most "great men" held the prejudices of their time.\nMartin Luther was a terrible anti-semite.\nSo was Richard Wagner, and Richard Strauss.\n\nCertainly the great minds of the Enlightenment weren't thinking about women when they said "all Men are created equal."  Thomas Jefferson held slaves and had sex with them.\n\nThat makes these people human. BUt their accomplishments are still very important to religion, culture, political thought.\n\nNobody's perfect (well, some people say one man was perfect, but he's a man-god.).  As long as we don't engage in "hero worship," thinking our founding fathers, or musicians, or philosophers, or movie stars, are perfect, holding some beliefs of the time does not destroy the person's other accomplishments.
448628
I would say we did not exist before God. We only existed in his mind as he was planning to create us.\nMen probably think they can rule somebody because they are strong enough to do it but not smart enough to understand they don't have to do it.\nI would say the contrary concerning about men avoiding household.
773724
I have seen friends create weaker men/husbands not by being too nice, but by taking over everything, doing everything, and controlling everything.  The men get used to them doing everything and they become lazy, weak, and don't feel needed.
613433
Sorry honey, but you've pretty much summed up EVERY man in that statement!! (well ok, not EVERY one, but the majority of them are self-centered!)
194976
I don't think it's so much a matter of people being too dependant on authority as it is a matter of people not wanting to take responsibility for themselves any more. People need to be told what to do nowadays because they don't like thinking for themselves, don't like having to be the one responsible if something happens that they don't like, don't like being the reason for something happening that doesn't benefit themselves.\n\nIt's a sad world that we have birthed, and our children are going to pay dearly for it.
1180788
Well all men were not created equil but all people were created equal. :)