North Korean Ship Registry?
404175
what are you asking? Most ships regardless of flag are on one of the main classification societies anyway if anything for international standards at sea and a quicker process upon entering foreign port. examples being DNS,ABS, or one of the many Loyd's societies.
618245
I realize this will be quite difficult, but you will have to do a little more "dirty hands" research and dig up some information such as the name of the company who owned the ship, or where it was built, etc. in order to find your info.  I have seen lots of info about ship-owning families and companies, but few ship's names (except very famous ones) actually appearing in web searches.  Good luck!
541236
Yes, I read about it.\n\nHere's the Navy's official version:\nhttp://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq21-1.htm
1078530
North Korea being a communist state is supplied with equipment from Russia. Sure they have the Mig 25s and the T-72 battle tanks and a small Navy. The country touts its nuclear capability so it can get foriegn aid. They are a desolite country and see how well the south is doing and want that too. The military is run by its dicator and have quite a large army. They are held somewhat in check by the S.Koreans and the US Army at the 38 paralell.
767378
http://uboat.net/allies/warships/ship/3943.html\nShe was a good ship and crew...good nuggets of info here.
732253
Try this site\n\nhttp://www.nsopr.gov/
1029023
Try this.\n\nhttp://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-k/ss35.htm
211958
yes,it is not on the thisk,it's on your computer:\nstart->run->regedit.exe->enter\nand there u will find a list of all your registry entries.it's a probability that u won't understand anything from there,but u may try to...
725941
I saw the report. Something is fishy. First off why would our military ever let that info out if it were true? Secondly, a diesel sub, and we can't detect it with a carrier group until it surfaces close to that group implying we will get shot out of the water if we try to do anything.  Bullcrap. It sounds like a political ploy in the making. Here's my guess. China has intentions of invading Taiwan, and we are not going to do a darn thing because we owe China too much money. I hope some Navy people post on this question. I want to hear their opinions.
1155694
http://www.korean-war.com/
883419
it's actually Cal Maritime in Vallejo, and the web link is:\nhttp://www.csum.edu/
1184964
www.nvr.navy.mil/nvrships/details/ATF106.htm\n\nalso, if you type "ATF 106" into the Google search bar .........
556663
You did not say if you were a retired veteran or just a veteran of the military.\n\nIf you are a military veteran you may not get exchange or commissary privileges.\n\nIf you are retired military veteran and have your military retired ID card, you may request from the Commander US Forces Korea the privilege of shopping in the commissary and PX.  He or she will either approve or disapprove your request.\n\nThe last time I was in Korea I was approved to shop in the exchange because before I arrived there I requested permission as a retired military veteran with a retired military ID card.\n\nI hope this has been of some use to you, good luck\n\n"FIGHT ON"
1012548
http://www.geocities.com/freighterman.geo/types.html
392642
Here are a couple of links:\n\nhttp://www.nzmaritime.co.nz/amokura.htm\n\nhttp://www.simplyhifi.com.au/HMS_Sparrow_10_2.jpg
989890
North Korea does not have ballistic missiles capable of reaching targets in the US -- yet!!!  Plans to test the first such missile appear to be in go-ahead stage, but until a successful test launch and subsequent successful test launches, they will not have demonstrated a reliable long range missile system.  We also have no credible evidence that North Korea has produced a weapon capable of being mounted on the missile.  We also cannot confirm that North Korea even has any nuclear weapons at all, although we know they have sufficient plutonium for several devices and we suspect they have built several devices.\n\nKim Jong Il postures in a risky game of brinkmanship by permitting this test prep to proceed.  The missile was fueled Sunday, June 18, which is usually an indicator that the launch will go forth.  (Removing fuel is a hazardous procedure, so fueling usually means a go-ahead status.)\n\nIf the test proceeds, it will be Korea's first launch attempt of a long range missile since its unsuccessful 1998 launch of a missile over Japan.  That missile's third stage failed to engage and the missile broke up and fell into the Pacific.  Analysts fear Korea has improved the missile design since then.\n\nIf there is a launch and it is successful, we will enter a new era, and we'll see nuclear brinkmanship not seen since the Cuban missile crisis.\n\nComparisons of Korea and Iraq are not valid, and solutions will vastly differ.  \n\nIn the post-USSR era, the US stands more likely to be targeted with a nuclear weapon or weapons by terrorist organizations.  Such stateless organizations have the ambition to make such attacks, and are unhampered by any fears of retaliation, as there would be no nation-state against whcih to retaliate.\n\nNorth Korea's Kim Jong Il is fettered by his nation, and is well aware of the stakes.  \n\nI suppose, in my weary last words here tonight, I'd say that I don't think that Kim Jong Il will launch a nuclear weapon against the US because our response will not be a tactical air and ground campaign.  It will be a nuclear response.\n\nI'd like to write more, but it's late and I'm tired.  I hope what I did write makes sense and is at least somewhat informative.  I don't pretend to know how this will all play out in the coming months and years.\n\nI'm sorry to be seeing the situation develop, but that seems to be the theme of the post 9-11 world as I know it.
1009721
This is the official homepage of the DPR or North Korea:\n\nhttp://www.korea-dpr.com/\n\nCheck this also: http://www.kcna.co.jp/index-e.htm\n\nThey are both in English.