Do you actually believe that Al Qaeda attacked the U.S. on September 11th?
399832
Try this link. It will reveal and answer a lot of questions you may have.\n\nhttp://fpiarticle.blogspot.com/2006/04/911-in-plane-site.html\n\nI dont believe a plane crashed into the pentagon. Flight 93 was made up. The planes that crashed into the WTC's were not commercial airlines. There is no proof! With all the video footage... you never really see the commercial logos. It's all bogus.\n\nThink about it. Why would the government do this? To create FEAR! This is the new era. There is no more cold war. No more bad super power. So where does the government turn for war? To an invisible word called "Terrorist". The war on terrorism is only a few words. \n\nFear makes me people more controllable. They spend more. They submit to anything that will protect them. And in exchange for it all is our freedom.
1090154
do you really think we would be in iraq if 9/11 hadnt happened ?after the islamic jihadists 30th attack on america , we finally responded. dont confuse the issue . the terrorists are the jihadists.
670766
9/11 is when General Pinochet seized power in Chile with the help of the CIA.\n\nIronic that the bunch of terrorists carried out attacks in the USA on that anniversary.\n\nStill, if you think a missile hit the Pentagon or that a UFO hit the 2nd Twin Tower then I suspect that you love conspiracies.\n\nFor me, I believe that a group of mad Muslims hijacked several planes and crashed them into US buildings in the name of "Allah". Nothing sinister, no Government collaboration, just a major terrorist attack against the USA.
936248
Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny. \n\nFAKE CONFESSION\nThe official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.\nhttp://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg\n\nEVIDENCE\nThere are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.\nhttp://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM\n\nHere is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=\n\nMolten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid.  Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7, that was not even hit by a jet.\nhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ\n\nFORENSICS\nA chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.\nhttp://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml\n\nCONFESSION \nWe also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329\n\nTESTIMONY\nThere is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon..."\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=\n \nThis video, obtained by a public interest group, shows the top rear fin of an air craft  hiding behind a call box:  Whatever is hiding back there, is under 48 ft. long, to small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 ft. long.\nhttp://www.clipaday.com/2006/05/pentagon_plane_crash_from_sept.html\n\nMOTIVE\nThe New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.\nhttp://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf\n\nOPPORTUNITY\nWitnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off
1104038
The "twin towers" as well as the Pentagon were not attacked by terrorists. They were attacked by our own government!! The "plan" was to get everyone "fired up" to attack the Islam nations, so we could get control of the world's oil supply. If you don't believe me check out the link! This is a VERY informative website!\n\nhttp://www.hugequestions.com/
1014359
Oh lordy, I thought I was alone.  There is NO evidence of any connection between Iraq and 9/11.\n\nJesus some of these people are dumb.
404409
Certainly not.  Bin Laden took credit for it, and he and his buddies plotted it without any help from the US.  It's ridiculous to even give this idea a moment's consideration.
754302
Yes, Al Quada was responsible for the attack on the twin towers on 9/11/2001, but Bin Laden may not have been responsible.\n\nBin Laden is said to have approved the attack, but he had nothing to do with the actual planning and he is not in charge of Al Quada.  Bin Laden is a rich Saudi and a great contributor to the cause of Al Quada.  Without a doubt some of his money was used to fund the attack, but it is doubtful if Bin Laden is in charge of Al Quada.  However, at the time the Bush Administration announced its vendetta against him he was the highest Al Quada leader we knew of.\n\nThe death of Bin Laden will not stop Al Quada; in fact it will survive the death of any one of its leaders, even if we are able to kill the entire leadership someone will rise from the ranks to take over.  We have seen exactly this happen in Iraq.  However, if Bin Laden were killed then that would cut off a lot of Al Quada's funding.\n\nIf cutting the "head" off the beast won't work then the US Government will be happy to cut off the "foot" (Bin Laden) so it can't keep running.\n\nAl Quada would not take the blame from anyone else.  They are quite proud of their crime and are extremely happy to take credit for it.  The successful attacks prove that Al Quada is a powerful force in the world of international terrorism.  Hamas and Hezbollah would love to pull something like that off in the US.  Because of their attacks against the US Al Quada are heroes in the Middle East.\n\nI also don't believe the conspiracy theories that the US somehow helped, wanted, or pulled off the attacks.  There are much easier ways to plan for a war in Iraq.  In fact Bush's staff was looking for some excuse so George Junior could "finish" Daddy's War.  I don't like the Bush Administration, but I don't think they would be capable of doing something like this.\n\nIF however, I were wrong, if somehow they or part of the government were behind the attacks then the news of that would have surely leaked out by now.  News that powerful simply can't remain hidden.  The thing that most conspiracy nuts forget is that it takes more than 2 or 3 people to pull off these big conspiracies.  It has been said, "Two people can keep a secret, if one of them is dead."   Talk about a huge story, if someone just had a rumor of proof they could go to any newspaper and become famous overnight.  Then they could go on the talk show network and become rich, all the while being a huge hero in the eyes of every American, not to mention the book deal.  That kind of temptation is too strong to resist and that is why I know that the big conspiracies aren't real. People love to gossip too much and the rewards for busting a conspiracy this big would be worth almost any risk, even the risk of your own life and the lives of your family.  If someone got that news out then they would have it made for the rest of their lives.\n\nWhat we need to worry about is Al Quada’s threat to take out the Capitol or White House.  Al Quada was behind the first bombing of the World Trade Center.  When that failed they came up with a new plan.  They are working on another plan right now.  Hopefully they are too tied up fighting us in Iraq to pull anything off, but as so many leaders have said, “The terrorists only have to get lucky once.”\n\n·Al Quada was behind 9/11, they are proud of that fact and it makes them a force in the Middle East.\n·Bin Laden supported 9/11 with both money and his blessing, but he was not responsible for it.\n·Any conspiracy that the US government could have somehow been involved in the attack just won’t hold up to scrutiny.  The simple fact that no credible evidence has been found to date that the US had something to do with the attack proves it.
499273
9/11 has been in works since Operation Desert Shield. Even afterwards, while we flew Operation Northern and Southern Watch from Prince Sultan Airbase over Iraq, Bin Laden was fuming at the USA "infidels" being so close to Mecca. It was going to happen someday. GWB just drew the wrong card.
817264
I think I'm a moderate Democrat, and no, I don't subscribe to the more outrageous conspiracy theories.  Two planes piloted by Arabs took down the WTC.  One plane crashed into the Pentagon, and another was crashed by the terrorists in Pennsylvania.  I still wonder where that anthrax came from.
1077136
Why ask? You don't even believe 9/11 happened the way it did and you apparently don't respond well to questions as to what you do believe happened. \n\nAs to this question, absolutely it should have been responded to exactly the way it was except that our government should stop worrying about what liberals say and carry out the war with all the necessary force. Further, I just don't understand why some believe that Saddam Hussein or the Taliban is so much preferred to the U.S. democratic political system. That's what we know so that's what we teach. Seems to have served you well.
27590
1. Who made 9/11 attacks:\na. Physically "Al Qaeda", practically we (US) have some blame on our selves because our middle-eastern policy is very biased towards Israel and we supported dictatorial regimes for a loooong time.\n\nb. Is it a political deceit: Yes & No. \nNo because the attacks did happen and because in 99.99% Al Qaeda was responsible. \nYes because, the US government plays the fear to launch its own geostrategic interests on the name of fighting terrorism. By the same token the British could have labeled the Boston Tea party as American terrorists.\n\n2. No one has ever the complete answer except the ones that did it. B. Laden admitted that he organized it.\n\n3. The only thing you can rely from a politician is that you can not rely on them. Some say politics is the art of the marrying the ideal with the feasible.\n\n4. Catching Saddam was much easier. Saddam does not have an international underground network.\n\n5. The Taleban where Stationary targets and did not launch a guerilla warfare. No member of Al Qaeda walks with an "Al-Qaeda member" stamp on his forehead. They blend with the local population that sometimes is supportive.\n\n6. Guerilla war is much more difficult than Desert Storm. The Iraqi army was sitting ducks. \n\n7.
834379
Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.  The picture of the cut core beam should be of special interest to someone with demolition knowledge.\n\nFAKE CONFESSION\nThe official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.\nhttp://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg\n\nEVIDENCE\nThere are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.\nhttp://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM\n\nHere is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=\n\nMolten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid.  Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.\nhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ\n\nFORENSICS\nA chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.\nhttp://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml\n\nCONFESSION \nWe also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329\n\nTESTIMONY\nThere is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon..."\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=\n \nThis video, obtained by a public interest group, shows the top rear fin of an air craft hiding behind a call box: Whatever is hiding back there, is under 48 ft. long, to small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 ft. long.\nhttp://www.clipaday.com/2006/05/pentagon_plane_crash_from_sept.html\n\nMOTIVE\nThe New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.\nhttp://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf\n\nOPPORTUNITY\nWitnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buil
659634
I'm starting to believe they were involved in some way.  I've seen that video, and it is very persuasive, but I don't think all of it could be true.  It's obvious that Bush and the ruling class have benefited greatly from the "attack".\n\nOh, I recommend that everyone watch the video at http://tinyurl.com/gqta9 .  It will change what you believe about the "attacks".
879278
Wow! I wasn't aware that everyone knew about the terrorist attack prior to it happening.\n\nDemocrats & the Liberals would have you believe that it was only the government that knew.\n\nCan you guys get your stories straight please. Its no wonder you are all so messed up with your thinking, you can't even coordinate consistancy with your lies.
799117
Please calrify your question.\nAre you trying to JUSTIFY 9/11??????
649228
I have not seen this but i can only imagine the theory behind 9/11.  I know that it was not by accident that the twin towers came a tumblin down...but i also know that it would never have happened if the gov't wasn't in on it. It is just to tragic and too big of a game for it to happen on American soil.