which country have never had a investigation of nuclear weapons?
404556
The U.S. -- we exclude ourselves from investigation, probably because we have the most nukes and no one can make US.\n\nAlthough Haiti, was pretty funny.  \n\nOr Bikini Atoll after that one little explosion.
426364
I don't think any country should have nuclear power unless they are using it for producing power, not weapons.
46848
USA, UK, France, China, Russia, India, Pakistan, Israel(but have not admitted), South Africa had them but gave them up.
457093
Yes, Seneca said that.  Interesting that you would quote him. Do you know what his point was in saying "Be careful that your enemies dont get your weapons"?  Sounds a lot like that quote is very much in support of limiting nuclear proliferation Would it be best if nobody had nukes?  In the 50 years before nuclear weapons were invented, over 100 million people were killed in wars.  And in the 60+ years since, is that true?  If the US destroyed all of it's nuclear weapons, do you seriously believe this would end the problem?  That countries like North Korea and Iran would generously quite trying to build them?  The US, along with the EU, is trying to stop other countries from building nuclear weapons.  Are you trying to say that because the US, France, and the UK, among others, have nuclear weapons, that they should not try to stop proliferation?  Are you saying that the US and those other countries should get rid of their nuclear weapons, and thus would miraculously cause everyone else to stop building them?  Think about it-the US is hated by many powerful countries.  If the US got rid of their nuclear weapons, would that tend to make those countries more eager, or less, to build a weapon that, once the US had none, could aid these other countries in actually defeating the US on a battlefield?  Think through your argument- The US having nuclear weapons may be a problem, but it is unrelated to nuclear proliferation.  And, the US is not leading the battle to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons, the EU is.
1086575
I feel uncomfortable with any nation having nuclear weapons.  If you are refering to general technology, such as power plants, then not necessarily, because there are a lot of countries without democratically elected governments that have nuclear technology.  It does not matter who has the technology, its how they use it that is important.
885475
i think it is stupid and irresponsible.  The US is the only country in history ever to use an atomic weapon, and on civilian targets, what right do we have to dictate who can or cannot have nuclear weapons?
1015722
WMDs haven't been. The useless remains of WMDs have been found. What has been found amounts to nothing more than toxic waste which is easily found in Iraq; and in the United States for that matter.
622632
it is not a new discovery. UN have been a puppet in USA hands for long time now. UN is useless when the subject concerns USA.
581271
The world's best-known and most  efficient 'secret' manufacturer of weapons of mass destruction  is not Iraq, not even North Korea, but the barbaric zionist enclave in Palestine. A nuclear, biological and chemical  warfare programme that even the Israeli Knesset cannot get  access to, let alone the United Nations.  In September 1986, Mordechai Vanunu, a technician at  Israel's Dimona nuclear site, revealed to the Sunday Times  that the nuclear military programme based there had produced  'over 200' nuclear warheads. Days later he was tricked into flying to Rome where he was  abducted by Mossad agents and secretly transported to Israel.  In November 1986, he was tried in camera and sentenced to 18  years' imprisonment, 14 of which were spent in solitary  confinement.\nIn 1999, in response to a petition from Yediot Ahronot  newspaper, the government released about 40 per cent of the  trial documents.\nThe Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists estimates that Israel  has the world's fifth largest stockpile of nuclear warheads  (more than Britain, which it believes has 185).\nIn February 2000, Knesset member Issam Mahoul said Israel  had '200 to 300' nuclear weapons; in August of that year, the  Federation of American Scientists said that Israel could have  produced 'at least 100 nuclear weapons, but probably not  significantly more than 200'; the Stockholm International  Peace Research Institute estimates 200. Other sources, including Jane's Intelligence Review,  estimate between 400 and 500 thermonuclear and nuclear  weapons.\nWhat Dimona is to Israel's nuclear programme, the Israeli  Institute for Biological Research (IIBR) at Nes Ziona is to  its chemical and biological warfare (CBW) programme. The  high-security facility is absent from aerial survey  photographs and maps, on which it has been replaced by orange  groves.\nExcept for token visits to Dimona by a Norwegian team in  1961 and a US team in 1969, there has been no international  scrutiny. Even the Knesset is denied access.\nHowever, the 1993 report by the Office of Technology  Assessment for the US Congress states that Israel has  'undeclared offensive chemical warfare capabilities' and is  'generally reported as having an undeclared offensive  biological warfare programme'.\nAnthony Cordesman of the Centre for Strategic and  International Studies states that Israel has conducted  extensive research into gas warfare and is ready to produce  biological weapons.\n\nAccording to an exhaustive study by Karel Knip, a Dutch  journalist, the IIBR's work has included the synthesis of  nerve gases such as tabun, sarin and VX.\n\nThe October 1992 crash an of El Al cargo plane in Amsterdam  that caused at least 47 deaths and caused hundreds of  immediate and subsequent mysterious illnesses led to the  disclosure in 1998 that flight LY1862 was carrying chemicals  including 50 gallons of dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP) - enough to produce 594 pounds of sarin. The DMMP was supplied  by Solkatronic Chemicals Inc of Morrisville, Pennsylvania, and  was destined for the IIBR.\n\nAvner Cohen has catalogued reported uses of biological  weapons by Jewish forces during the 1948 war in Palestine. The  Israeli historian Uri Milstein alleged that 'in many conquered  Arab villages, the water supply was poisoned to prevent the  inhabitants from coming back.' Milstein states that one of the largest of such covert operations caused the typhoid outbreak  in Acre in May 1948.\n\nThe Palestinian Arab Higher Committee reported in July 1948  that there was some evidence that Jewish forces were  responsible for a cholera outbreak in Egypt in November 1947  and in Syrian villages near the Palestinian-Syrian border in  February 1948.\n\nIn May 1948, the Egyptian ministry of defence stated that  four 'zionists' had been captured while trying to contaminate  artesian wells in Gaza with 'a liquid which was discover
838476
I would go with zero.  I would use information about the status of the enviorment and the prevenance of nuclear warheads and what countries have them.
18393
USA, Russia, France, Britain, China, India and Pakisthan have weapons and ICBM's to deliver those.\nIsrael might have a few, North Korea and Iran might be developing as Pakisthan and China and Russia might've sold secrets.\nUSA and Russia have 1000's while France, Britain, China  have hundreds.\nIndia's count is unknown but is suspected to rival China as they have been producing in secret since 1970's (Indira Gandhi)\nMany countries like South Africa and Canada have technology but don't build them.\nWith Canada, France, USA's and Russia's help India might rival almost everyone.
533503
It's ridiculous that one country would assume it has the right to tell another country not to produce or have the same weapons it has. I don't understand why any of the people concerned are so stupid: I mean, if anyone ever did decide to deploy nuclear weapons, we'd ALL die...
1049152
This is a very difficult question.  Yes, every country has the right to nukes, it is only fair.  However, that being said, every country having nukes is going to lead to an apocolyptic war, so it is in the interest of the entire world to limit the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
444679
With the rise in power of countries these days, we are lucky all we need to develope are bunker busting weapons.  Many countries have developed nuclear technology since the end of the "cold" war.  I'd be more concerned with the Iranians and North Koreans obtaining nuclear weapons than with the U.S. developing a weapon that could take out nuclear weapons in their silo's.
78424
Is it the cold war again? Huh. Now I'm not a fan of N. Korea's abuses or posessions of nuclear weapons, but what is to stop them from asking the same question about the US especially as it has enough nuclear weapons to cover the surface of the earth several times, and we are the only nation to ever use them?
418886
It is bad that any country has atomic bombs. As of now, it is not proven Iran has atomic weapons, it is only proven they have enriched uranium.
91551
There isn't any danger. Because IAEA is observing all nuclear activities in these two countries. So, Will there be any danger? But there are some countries that are making nuclear weapons but no one prohibit them of countinuing their destructive plans. Honest!