Can I sub-serve a court subpoena on the witness' brother?
412977
In almost all states, that probably constitutes good and sufficient service.  But without knowing your state (and whether you're a party to the action) it is impossible to say for sure.\n\nP.S.  The person above me is wrong.
399163
Hypothetically, you had to do something to &!$$ him off.  I've had people give me the lamest excuse for a threat (usually because they can't beat me up because they're fat) "My (distant relative) is in the Mafia!"  But if you were threatened, technically, join the witness protection program.
911024
Once you have been served with the subpoena there is no way you can get out of testifying, otherwise you would be in contempt of court and could go to jail until you decide to testify.
69246
i dont know but u can call the jail and if u know that persons name thay will tail u if thear thare or not i have a brother in person i called the person to see if he wase thear so try it .
296383
The answer is NO. But, you can't be forced to testify against your spouse.\n\nThe general rule is "The spousal privilege, also known as the marital communication privilege or marital privilege, is a form of privileged communication protecting the contents of communications between husband and wife. When applied, a court may not force one spouse to testify against the other.\n\nThe privilege is usually restricted to communications made during marriage and does not include communications made after divorce. In addition, courts usually do not permit an adverse spouse to invoke the privilege during a trial initiated by the other spouse or in the case of domestic abuse. Finally, courts may require that the communication relate specifically to communications about the marriage.\n\nSome courts distinguish between spousal privilege and marital communication. The distinction usually means that spousal privilege prevents one spouse from calling the other to testify to the detriment of the marital unit--this may occur in divorce proceedings or child custody disputes. Marital communication refers to the more general privilege.\n\nMarital privilege is based on the policy of encouraging spousal harmony."\n\nWhat isn't mentioned is that the spouse being asked to testify is the one that holds the privilege and the spouse being testified against can't stop the testimony by invoking the privilege.
1021654
You need to get your lawyer to subpoena the report.  He can get it prior to the court date, as he will need it to prepare for his arguement.
834136
What is it you're asking?  Your question doesn't really make much sense.  There are plenty of rules regarding service of subpoenas.  What state are you in?  What kind of subpoena?  Who's failing to serve?
982004
Apparently someone has been criminally charged as a result of of your complaint. Obviously they contest the charge(s) or refuse to plea and adequately moved for jury trial. Unless they take a plea for a reduced charge you will probably have a say, if not some explaining to do.\n\nOtherwise you have turned the matter over to the "court" and they will decide if you get to say anything in a legal forum regarding the matter. \n\nFurther it is up to the states prosecuting counsel and the defendants counsel whether or not you will be called as a witness of which there is no guarantee you will get to testify.
1031593
You would need to subpoena their tax return records.  If you do it that way, they have to turn them over to you.
700770
Depends on the nature of the work involved.Your Brother should seek legal advice as soon as possible. Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) can offer all the advice,free of charge.I wish him luck.
767319
I am not a lawyer, but anytime there is a court date with you involved, the court will send you a summons. If you haven't been served with one yet, you probably don't have anything to worry about as long as the mother knows your address or your husbands place of work so he can be served the papers. It is possible they may try to be tricky and give notice in the newspaper. Watch the Public Notices section to see if his name appears in any notices to appear that may be there.\nGood luck
1039451
The only way to quash a deposition subpoena in California is to file a motion to quash pursuant to CCP § 1987.1.\n\n1987.1 provides in pertinent part\n"When a subpoena requires the attendance of a witness or the production of books, documents or other things before a court, or at the trial of an issue therein, or at the taking of a deposition, the court, upon motion reasonably made by the party, the witness, or any consumer described in Section 1985.3, or upon the court's own motion after giving counsel notice and an opportunity to be heard, may make an order quashing the subpoena entirely, modifying it, or directing compliance with it upon such terms or conditions as the court shall declare, including protective orders. In addition, the court may make any other order as may be appropriate to protect the parties, the witness, or the consumer from unreasonable or oppressive demands including unreasonable violations of a witness’s or consumer's right of privacy."\n\nIt sounds to me like you're short on time in which case you can file the motion after filing an ex parte application to have the matter heard on shortened time.  This is a somewhat complicated process for a layperson but a matter of course for a lawyer.  Find one.  Get him/her to file the necessary motions on your behalf.\n\nAnother option, already suggested, is to contact that attorney who seeks your deposition and ask to reschedule while you try to obtain counsel through your insurance carrier.  Any reasonable attorney will make necessary accommodations to you.\n\nFinally, the last option, after you've spoken with the deposing attorney, is to not show up.  This is dangerous as it could open you up to sanctions.  However, if you document your conversations with the deposing attorney and can show the court that s/he refused to make reasonable scheduling concessions, then the court is less likely to sanction you for not appearing.\n\nPlease keep in mind that this response is for informational purposes only. I highly suggest you speak with your own attorney (or the hospital's attorney) so that you can properly decide what to do.
761351
I AGREE WITH YOU 100%\nTALK TO YOUR BROTHER ABOUT GETTING HIS RECORD SEALED (I BELIEVE IT CAN BE DONE AFTER 5 YRS.) AS LONG AS LAW ENFORCEMENT DOESN'T OPEN IT AGAIN ITS A DEAD ISSUE
46261
The problem here is that he lives in your place. It dont matter if it is in your name or not he lives there. When i was served with a warrant at my sisters house it did not matter that i wasnt on the lease what mattered was what was in the house. All 4 of us went to jail even tho my sister and brother in law knew nothing about what was there. Im not sure if this helps you but I thought I would share my experiance. I think you gave yourself the best advice, "get an attorney A.S.A.P."
65707
Probably not.  Get your brother to give it back to you.  Has it been filed with the County Recorder?  See an attorney.
627446
Dear Friend,\n\nYou probably can't, unless they owe you money.  If they owe you money, you can sue them for it.  If they say they can't pay, or if they ignore you after you win, you can subpoena their bank records.\n\nYour Friend,\nFrancesois
796635
If you invoke Fifth Amendment rights in response to a subpoena, the prosecution has two alternatives available:\n\n1. Grant you some form of immunity covering your testimony.\n2. Proceed without your testimony.\n\nHowever, if the subpoena calls for anything other than oral testimony, such as documents in your possession, the Fifth Amendment does not apply, and failure to respond constitutes contempt.