Is this equation accurate.?
399492
You almost had me, but check this answer out.\nA square has 2 square roots, a positive and a negative.\nSo girls and money have opposite signs. Which one is\npositive is your choice. \n  But here's another point, when money squared is\nnegative, Girls are definitely imaginary.
714493
This *is* the way to write it so that x is the input and w is the output. If you want to solve for x in terms of w (i.e. have w the input and x the output), you are better off doing numerical approximations than using the cubic formula (it is really, really nasty).
510352
The solution by a_ebnlhaitham is not quite correct in that he omitted the 2 from the power of r (i.e.(teta)).The answer should be 1/(1 - r^2) not 1/(1 - r). The series converges because r lies in the open interval (-1,1).
663777
SOrry, I can't help you. If I had the formulas I could do it, but there is no way I remember that off the top of my head! Good luck
159588
The newest views about this say the following:\n\nB=m/h^h\n\nKaterina\n\nP.S. I don't explain anything more, as you can find it in the previous Q! They were quicker than me.Anyway, when 2 persons have the same opinion in a forum, seems that this opinion is correct. Good for you!
541116
3=2 did get a correct answer...maybe you need to review your rules of square roots.
307282
that math formula that proves it is SO WRONG! i just talked about this with someone, if you look at the formula it gets messed up like halfway through.\n\ndo we need to break this down?\none fish + one fish = 2 fish
224079
try this site... it shows step by step how to go about sloving these equations, good luck:
670392
If the two equations are related, and if the second equation is correct, then the first equation is wrong.\nIf 3x=2(x-4), then 3x-2(x-4)=0\nOn the other hand, if the two equations are not related, then x could be different in each, and therefore both could be correct.
677061
i think this formula works.\nfactorial of A-4A\nso.using this formula the correct answer is 5012
766444
time to the minus one.\n\nDo a dimensional analaysis on a rate equation to confirm this.
115650
--5 2 0 1 -----  F L O W\n--4 2 0 1 -----  B L O W\n--1 0 2 5 -----  W O L F\n-------------------------\n1 0 4 2 7 ----- N O B L E\n\nBut still N and W value are coming same...does this problem have solution. If you have then can you please send the answer to my mail id hssiddhu@yahoo.com
603820
Well i cannot write the whole formula here but check the link below
197333
i think \nx = 2664.173
950045
Correct formula should be as follows:\n\nE = 1/2*I*w^2
4935
ur second equation is wrong. \n2a is not equal to a-squared (which u symbolized by ab, since a=b).
243814
although the equation is not complete and therefore the full answer can not be given. i believe this equation will need to be differentiated using the product of a product rule.