how could you start an uncontrolled bosch Reaction  on venus or mars?
401900
you would have to find the hydrogen somewhere.
343519
Here's a way to turn a common household chemical reaction into some fun.\n\nhttp://www.torgo.org/bpsubs/
891273
I don't understand this questions, but if you are looking for the bibliography of Carl Bosch. You can find it here:\n\nhttp://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1931/bosch-bio.html
212381
What are you asking about these reactions?
312986
dude above this comment addressed some of the problems . . . but what about the solutions?\n\nFor my astrobiology class I did research on terraforming Mars, and learned quite a bit.  The first thing that would need to be done is landing, constructing miniature chemical fixing plants that could do to the atmosphere exactly what we're doing to this planet right now: release greenhouse gases that otherwise would be locked in the regolith. This would have to be done first to allow the planet to warm up a little bit, but this would take a few hundred years. You see, this would project would have to have the full commitment of the entire human race over a few thousand years for this to be "completed."\n\nAfter a few hundred years of warming,  you might actually outgas enough atmosphere from the regolith to hold liquid water stably, you might have a little more CO2 to build atmos. pressure, but growing algae or anything would require genetic engineering, since algae, im sure, is not going to grow in soils containing peroxides and epsom salts. They would fix the atmosphere to contain more oxygen. This would also take a few hundred years as well.\n\nAssuming we had the patience for this, we could have some sort of atmosphere close to 60% the pressure of ours within 600 years, and the temperatures from the 50s-70s (one scientific paper said something about 77F being reached feasibly). So this terraforming is do-able, but do we need to? have we finished discovering things on Mars before we start erasing it with running water and weather systems? \n\nSome say there is still a lot of water on Mars, enough to make an ocean covering the entire planet about a few feet deep (thats a lot), but that would take a lot of work to achieve.  Also, you have to realize that all this work would not be permanent.  Mars has no magnetic field, and thus no real protection from the solar wind which would slowly strip the planet of its atmosphere. \n\nthe "mars project" would be fruitful but not permanent, and would work for probably a good several millenia, but would need maintenance. . .  \n\nim done typing
250034
If you can be more specific about the reason, then I can offer something.\n\nEdit: Ether would work. Any chemical will have some type of reaction with the cobra. So, nothing is 100% safe. Also, I don't have any information on the legal side, so I can't name something.
632386
look here:\n\nhttp://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/neo_ca\n\nselect what you want to see displayed from the pop-up menus and select display table.  try selecting "PHAs (Potentially Hazardous Asteroids)" from the first pop-up menu.
573477
Although the gravity on Venus is very similar to Earth's (about 0.95 G), the other conditions of Venus' surface would not make for a very pleasant visit by an unprotected human.\n\nThe atmospheric pressure at 'sea' level on Venus is about 95 times that of Earth's atmosphere, which would be an equivalent pressure to being half a mile deep in the ocean.  The open pockets and cavities in our bodies would be completely crushed, and we would be unable to breathe.\n\nThat's assuming we'd want to breath.  Most of Venus' atmosphere is carbon dioxide, which is not exactly conducive to human respiration.  What isn't carbon dioxide is rather high in a number of sulfur compounds, including hydrogen sulfide (the stuff in sour gas wells that kills people very very dead very very quickly), and sulfuric acid (which is also not fun to breath, or even have on your skin).\n\nAssuming we had some kind of super-duper hard shell pressurized, armoured, acid-proof space suit with suitable oxygen supplies, we'd still have problems.\n\nThe average temperature on Venus is about 480 degrees Celcius (somewhere in the realm of 900 F), which is hot enough to melt lead, and the rivers of molten sulfur probably wouldn't be too hospitable either.\n\nThe only thing the planet might have going for it would be mineral resources, but we can probably get those just easily from the moon or even the asteroids.  That atmosphere is just too darned hostile.
895657
I think very soon there will be.  google.com/mars is very close.  Unfortunately, there's nothing really on Mars to check out.  Plus you can't get to the same resolution (obviously) as on Earth.\n\nVenus is even harder - there aren't really any well known features on Venus, and everything will be computer images based on radar telemetry.\n\nBut one day...\n\n.
426704
It depends on a variety of things: the angle of entry into the atmosphere, the size of the comet, the composition of the comet, etc.\n\nAn interesting note: one of the proposals for terraforming Mars is to use ice-coments to raise the amount of water vapor, create a greenhouse effect, and both warm the planet and add to the water on Mars.
207847
It's a Chemical/Fusion reaction...
206901
Add heat.\nAdd a catalyst.
433514
Possibly, but i believe venus is a better candidate.  The higher gravity of venus (very earthlike) would allow it to sustain an atmosphere like ours if we can solve 2 other problems...more solar radiation, and a retrograde day that is months long.\n\nThe L.O.V.E. project (Life On Venus Enhancement) I made this up when i was a kid:  solution 1 - put lightweight, but very large reflectors into orbit around venus, on the day side they will block light in a 24 hour pattern, on the night side they will provide sunlight in the same pattern.\n\nsolution 2 - release into orbit around venus a cloud of particles to reduce the solar radiation and also use the reflectors/shades described above.\n\nAs the temperatures approach earthlike conditions, introduce water (capture a comet probably, or change it's orbit subtly to get it to venus.)\n\nIt's possible there is substantial water on venus tied up in some chemical situation or another, we don't know enough about it.\n\nand btw, for the other answers claiming mars is too hot, um, no?
869853
Get some Wintergreen lifesavers.\n\n(P.S. - this really belongs in the Chemistry group, not the Astronomy group)
215215
There is very little chance mainly due to Venus' atmosphere which is made up predminantly of Carbon Dioxide (98%) which creates a severe greenhouse effect, not to mention the fact that the sulphur content in the atmosphere creates acid rain at regular intervals.
693601
It seems unnecessary since space settlement will be able to build more than a thousand times the Earth's surface area for us to live on while with Venus you might get the surface area of the Earth after a lot of effort and with Mars you'll get maybe a third or so (unless you do without oceans).\n\nTerraforming though is certainly possible, Mars would be easier than Venus but Venus would probably be a better planet once you finished it.\n\nTo terraform Mars you just increase the thickness of the atmosphere, put some plants there to give it oxygen and get some more heat to the planet (either you create a greenhouse effect or you put mirrors in orbit of the planet).  The biggest problem with Mars is the lower gravity.  It might not be a problem or might only be a problem if the Martians want to return to Earth or it might be almost as bad as zero g (and unlike in space it is very hard to make a large centrifuge on a planet).  The higher gravity will also make Mars incapable of holding an atmosphere with a lot of oxygen in it for any great length of time so over millions of years you'll have to replace the oxygen that leaks out.\n\nVenus has higher gravity (about 90% of Earth) so I don't expect gravity to be a problem there although heat is going to be a big problem.  Venus simply receives too much sunlight which is why it is so hot.  Even if you were to remove the atmosphere it would still be 100 °C which is far too hot for anyone to live so you have to reduce the insolation somehow.  Moving the planet would be the best way in my opinion although a giant filter between Venus and the sun (say at Sun-Venus L1) would also work.  Once you reduce the amount of sunlight striking the planet you can start to work on getting the atmosphere down to a more reasonable pressure by removing the CO_2 preferably by putting it into the rocks and then adding water.\n\nWith water you can then add plants and get photosynthesis going so that you can get the oxygen atmosphere needed.\n\nMercury might be another possibility but it combines the problems of Mars (low gravity and small size) with the problems of Venus (too much sunlight).
815739
This is a brilliant thought. Please read the book "The Case for Mars" by Dr Robert Zubrin, PhD. for a nuts and bolts down to earth scientific discussion of what it would take to put men on Mars, and ultimately to turn Mars into an Earthlike planet. It is available on amazon.com and in many local bookstores. I highly recommend it.