DID YOU HEAR THAT D-12'S PROOF IS DEAD? i just read it..?
396382
Yup. I heard about 2days ago. I live in Detroit so it was one the local news not to long after it occured. It's a really sad thing. And I hate to say this, because of the outcome, but it usually takes a tragedy for people to understand consequences.
1160864
lucky2bealive, I don't want to disagree with you but I don't believe you are going to find anywhere in the historical records that Bin Laden claimed responsibility for the 9/11 bombings. What he has done is praise the matyrs of that event. However, there would be more clarity and the issue can be put to bed finally if the government gave us the names of all the people that died in the various events. Where are the planes that crashed? Do you really believe that a building like the Pentagon would have cameras that are intermittent and take pictures every 7/8 seconds. Come.. Come. We are talking about the most technologically advanced country in the world. Something smells fishy and the stench cannot be dispersed until the Government come clean. Have you ever seen reports of the examination of  the so called crash sites?
1006681
Honey, I hate to tell you, but this "evidence" that 9/11 was an "inside job" was already disproven.  Don't you think that the news media would love to release it if it was so?  After all, they already had to admit that there was no actual "wire-tapping" and that the "leak" was actually the disclosure of declassified information.  It's like every time an allegation comes up, it's disproved, so they have to come up with something else.  They'd love to jump on the conspiracy theory bandwagon.  911truth.org is LIES.  So is Loose Change.  So is letsroll911.org.  The .org at the end of their names means nothing.\nMy proof?  A 100 year old magazine, with no political affiliation.  Go to www.popularmechanics.com, and search for the story about debunking the 9/11 myths.  They have actual testimony from witnesses, firemen, police officers, and scientists who studied exactly how and why those buildings came down.  \nPlease, please, please research this more thoroughly.  I've seen all those sites, I've seen the "evidence", I've watched their "documentaries".  I found them to be about as true as Fahrenheit 9/11, which Michael Moore himself admitted was mostly lies.  The rest was a distorted brand of truth and misquotes, and things taken out of context.
1167927
Amazing..at least those idiot's rewrote it for the 7th time. I couldn't believe it!!!\n\nThanks for posting this..I've sent this already to several people
400726
I don't know about the best, but I've heard a funny one.  To paraphrase, "a hacker has gained control of satellites and is beaming down mind control rays"...then the guy went on to post 'evidence' of this being true (like Bush writing his not asking if it was okay to use the restroom).  The sad part is, this guy was being serious.  See source link for his full description of what he thinks is happening.
785052
there is no evidence or confirmation
1027907
did the people who responded to this even read it??? haha\n\ni think it's hilarious...and so sad, yet so true.\n\ncheers!
1144268
it was a hoax.. check yahoo news
688295
Sparky First let me say I appreciate the 10 pts. I don't know what I did to piss you off though. I told you to look up the work "Qumran" because it is one of the best documented archaeological finds in the world and I knew that there would be plenty of info online (which would be convenient for you). Would you rather me refer you to the dozens of books that I know of offhand or to an infinite # of archaeological reports that are incredibly boring to read? I studied Qumran under Jodi Magness at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and she is the foremost American Archaeologist in the world concerning the "holyland." In particular, she is definitely the foremost authority on Qumran, where the Dead Sea Scrolls were found.  In case you don't know, archaeology is SCIENCE, not religion, and archaeological reports and finds are scientific and are not at all connected to the Church or any religion.  \n\nNothing in my answer to you dealt with religious dogma, I simply tried to answer your question as to why SOME Christians see a threat in the DaVinci code. Now, as for your claim that the bible was written 200 years after Christ, well that's true for some of the later NT books, but not of the Gospels. Some of the gnostic texts were much later than the gospels, which is part of the reason they were rejected by the church. \n\nAnd lastly, you claim that the bible has changed so many times that it's all crap. What do you have to support this? Go see the Dead Sea Scrolls some time, which were written between 2500-2000 yrs ago (as I visited a DSS exhibit about a month ago in Charlotte, NC). And then compare that to the KJV or the American Standard Bible.  The Old Testament found in the 1950s in the Caves near Qumran is nearly word for word with what we have today.  It is amazing that in 2000 or more years the Jewish text has changed so little!  This means that we should all reexamine the amount of credit we have granted the Jewish oral tradition that was so important to the early Christian Church.  IT IS ACCURATE, whether you want to admit it or not. SCIENCE and HISTORY support that.\n\nAgain, I answered your question rather well... Let me try one more time in FIVE SIMPLE SENTENCES that will be very easy for you to comprehend this time:\n\n1.  It wouldn't be so bad if Jesus was married.\n\n2.  Christians are NOT offended or threatened by the possibility that Jesus could have been married.\n\n3.  It's simply not historically true or believable, from the bible and from the writings of two Roman historians Tacitus and Josephus.\n\n4.  However, Some Christians ARE offended by the notion that Christ was not Divine; and the "The DaVinci Code" claims his having a child is proof that Jesus was NOT divine.\n\n5.  Such a claim can be damaging to the mission field because people like you believe anything and everything you read in a novel or see on TV and are therefore hostile toward Christianity.\n\nSo, that's why some Christians are offended by the DaVinci Code and by the notion that Christ might have been married to and had a child with Mary Magdalene.  Because of the hostility towards Christianity that such false belief creates.  People like you work directly against anyone trying to bring people to Christ.  \n\nPS.. the whole "MM was a whore" lost in translation thing.. do your history research man, you don't know what you are talking about at all.  You speak fiction and pass it off as truth. \n\nAnd you wonder why people would be offended?  maybe some people just like the truth?\n\nLet me ask you a question.  Why are you so offended by Christianity?  What are YOU afraid of?  The Truth?
411741
he is alive and I've got some evidence...see it all makes sense one you check the link below\n\nIt all makes perfect sense
880857
Not only does ID lack any sort of evidence, it lacks any sort of testable hypothesis.\nThe fact is; ID is mythology trying to enter the classroom in disguise as science. Thankfully, the disguise is so flimsy and so easily seen through that no one with more than an ounce of brain matter is fooled.\n\nJohn, you're an outright liar.\nEinstein would NEVER have said anything that inane. I realize that pious fraud is something you idiots have to resort to on a daily basis, but it's still fraud...
63023
Long Story Short : Its a hoax\nThis story has been doing rounds in the net way back 9 years ago, in 1997 when the story was published in Times Of India on 21 February, 1997. You can check the date at http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.indian/msg/a8da930145866c1d\nI don't have the thumbnails of the OS at present, but when I saw it, I recognized immediately that it was Mandrake, a flavour of Linux, in reality, with the desktop wallpaper changed. \n\nIf the origin of the story is not a hoax, then following is my version : The student had taken Mandrake,  might have made changes in the source code to rename Mandrake with O-Yes and recompiled it. Such custom distros are available freely on net, where you can change the name. Mandrake in those days was certainly better than Windows 95, so here's how the story propogated. But the funny part is the name of the OS itself. Why on earth would he keep a name like that. Even if the first paragraph is believeble, the second paragraph removes any doubt for this mail to be true. This article was again published in Times of India around 2003, twice.\n\nAnother website was set up http://oyes.does.it. When someone ever accessed it, it gave the message "O-YES, You are our latest Bakra. # 945", with the number incrementing. The official site of this OS is http://oyes.thefreebizhost.com/, down for the last 2 years\n\nI can assure you there is going to be another round of such hoaxes. Just 2 days ago, i.e. 4th January 2006, Pratham Kumar, a student from Dhirubhai Ambani Institute of Information and Communication Technology, Gujarat purchased the domain http://ramlalbhagat.com/. I actually ran a WHOIS query to see who owned the domain. He has even kept the page title as 'O Yes'. Contact him at pratham.kumar@gmail.com if you want to ask, when is the next round of hoax mails coming.\n\nHope this gives a detailed info on the hoax. Some other interesting places to study about it include :\n\nhttp://hindustan.net/discus/messages/60/13420.html?1134658861\nhttp://hindustan.net/discus/messages/60/13641.html?1091625286\nhttp://techmount.com/index.php/20041024/o-yes/\nhttp://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.indian/msg/a8da930145866c1d\nhttp://www.mail-archive.com/ilug-cal@ilug-cal.org/msg10070.html\nhttp://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/1450/\nhttp://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache:-JSPCMALB5kJ:www.barficulture.com/community/biztech/topic.php/2110/+oyes%2Bthefreebizhost.com&hl=en\nhttp://www.xent.com/FoRK-archive/jan99/0415.html\nhttp://plug.org.in/pipermail/plug-mail/2004-September/013006.html\nhttp://www.vinuthomas.com/printout210.html\nhttp://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache:-JSPCMALB5kJ:www.barficulture.com/community/biztech/topic.php/2110/+oyes%2Bthefreebizhost.com&hl=en
578598
Ok, guys, I just received the same notice from someone on my buddy list.  Since I don't just blindly accept it when someone tells me about a virus or any such stuff (Have been burned by believing that before!!!) I decided to do some checking on the net.  On the trendmicro website I found some information stating that the j_neutron07 "virus" is just a hoax.  Nothing on snopes.com just yet either way. As always, the choose is yours as to whether you want to believe or not, just be informed before you decide!!!
283366
I'm not sure which I find more hliarious, that Patzy calls your article, "bullshit facts" yet there isn't a damn thing to prove God exists that isn't strung together inconsitencies and things that are unexplainable, or the fact that MommaToldMeNotToCome has no ability to read the article and see when the article you posted in fact written.  Fact is, no one should be calling anyone elses beliefs bullshit.  \n\nAs for your question, it could be.  There is no way to tell.  Lots of people were crucified at that time and what happened to Jesus wasn't special.  He was one of many.  \n\nAnd Susenjungle, the Shroud of Turin wasn't used by mary Magdelen to wipe Jesus face, it was what was laid over his body after the crucifiction and due to the oils the body secretes during the ordeal made an stain of his face and body on it.  I have some good books on the subject if you are interested, let me know!  I love sharing books!
445286
A decigram. And proof BESIDES a wiki to back it up!
933884
How in the world would you expect anyone to be able to answer this question?  \n\nCould they be bluffing?  Of course.  Or maybe they're not.\n\nDo they have the proof?  There's no way anyone here can possibly have that answer.  \n\nDo I think there might be an informant in this case?  Yes, I think there might be.  I also think there might not be.  Again, how would anyone possibly know?
1061435
YOU POSTED THE 'Q' 1 DAY AGO.\n\nBOTH YUAN AND PATRICIA DIDN'T RULED IT OUT..!!\n\nSO..'LOL'...THAT MUST BE TRUE !!!!!!!