who  might have come first,   boy or girl ? (I mean first on earth)?
406429
The simplest animals do not have seperate genders.  They are not male or female, but rather male and female combined.  We call them hermaphrodites, after a Greek mythological figure, the child of Hermes and Aphrodite who was both male and female.\n\nThat we are descended from hermaphrodites is demonstrated by our embryological development.  Before we're born, we all start off as neutral-sexed organisms, with both sets of the organs that will become testes or ovaries.  With a few exceptions, people with XX chromosomes lose the testes and the ovaries develop, making them female, while people with XY chromosomes lose the ovaries, develop the testes and become male.
469650
The first man on earth was Adam .... and he was alone because God created him with his power .But God didnt leave him alone ,He created Eve ...
314537
That is a great question that we will unfortunately never find the accurate answer to.\nAlthough, it only says in the Bible that Adam and Eve were the FIRST man and woman God created...I don't think it ever said they were the ONLY one's he created, if your looking for answers regarding the Bible.\nI'd also like to add that genetically, it's next to impossible to have a healthy child created in incest, especially as close as brother and sister. If those problems exist now, then reason says they would exist way back then as well. So, I think either God created more people, or Adam and Eve were the first "modern humans" along the evolution chain. I'm a bit undecided about it since I believe in God along with evolution...kind of weird, huh?
216451
Eve, Lilith came first. I guess maybe that could be wrong. Depends on how you define born. That is a mythology standpoint at least.
167575
The boys age or the girls's age?
592122
The chicken had to of come first. The chicken is what god created. If the egg came first then there would be no way for it to survive alone. Just like the questio n "What came first, the child or the parent?" Adam and Eve were the first 2 people on earth, they had the first baby. So it has been said. I don't know what you believe... but the answer is the CHICKEN.
429023
It is reasonable that there would be, seeing a person's gender is determined by (?what's the word?)To be a boy, you must have an x and a y. to be a girl you would have 2 x's. It is twice as probable then that it would be a girl then a boy. But then, that doesn't take into account the moon phase which does seem to do some. And also, there could be other factors. Also, after birth, males do tend to get killed more often then girls.
427214
If you are a creationist, like me, the chicken probably came first.\nIf you believe in evolution, then by that theory the egg would have come first.
895952
5 girls and 1 boy\n\nHowever, after re-reading your question and the other responses. I have noticed something in the wording of your question. In the main body you have the ratio ... girls to boys... which would leave mine correct. On the other hand, in the explanations section you have the ratio .... boys to girls which would require the reverse of 5 boys and 1 girl.  Thought, I would point out that situation in your varying reponses.
1037927
If "girls" would abandon you for a younger version than really were they ever there to begin with? They were probably waiting for someone else to come along the whole time. Don't worry Mr.Darwin! I am sure you have loyal fans. In the males and the females. \nLove & Light\nSharon\nOne Planet = One People
694977
Apparently the chicken came first.  Then the eggs.  According to Genesis anyway.
1072062
both are right.. in science studies, they only proved that dinosaurs came first. but in the bible, we cant question it bec its gods words
672072
Wow, does that include boys and girls???
680404
ok sweety. we don't know what you are . girl or boy.
338600
Adam was the 1st man.\nEve was the 1st woman.\nJinns and dinosaurs were the 1st creatures.
522321
some boys are innocent. some girls are innocent. so the answer is: Either. or neither. it depends.
217344
I do not think the question of better applies.  Consider the matter this way: The human mind in general has been deemed as equivalent organ between the sexes; with respect to its general psychological functions.  However, when incorporating real-world data one can see that maps over-the-span-of-human-time have basically been of the males' world.  Like hunters during the hunting and gathering times, travelers to places afar, explorers charting new lands, and the like, therefore, safe to say males as a group still do yet read more maps than do females.  I've no doubt there exists a female such as she can equally well read and interpret a specific map as can the best male.