Do you think that TELEPORTATION  will be possible in the future ?(as Stargate)?
366388
Actually yes, in theory teleportation is completely possible (I'd also like to point out that most things on Stargate are plausible, only they would be very difficult for us to achieve given our current level of technology). Also, I assume by 'teleportation' you mean the stuff like the Asgard beaming technology or the Goa'uld transport rings, not the Stargate. The Stargate actually does not fit the definition of teleportation, simply because it creates a wormhole through space, the wormhole is actually a direct "path" if you will, that transports the dematerialized object through so quickly that it appears to be telepotation.\nAs I stated earlier the Asgard beaming technology and the Goa'uld transport rings are much closer to teleportation, and are both scientifically plausible. Transport rings, when in position, transmit all matter within their circular formation to another pair of rings at a different location, utilizing a conduit of bright energy. If there is a person or object on the receiving end, the rings can exchange the two simultaneously. Asgard transporters on the other hand,  use magnificent energy beams to dematerialize their subjects and send their energy forms careening away at near-light speeds.
155292
See my answer to the question "Is time travel a possibility?" especially the part about other universes
297213
Tough to believe I agree. I just spent the last couple hours surfing for other information and opinions. I find the time travel theory plausible. My first question was if his mission was to go to 1975, what is he doing posting in 2000-1? The personal request from his grandfather strikes me as checking on a change to the timeline. So true or false? I am leaning towards true, but if he changed this timeline then future as he describes it is moot. Check out the site below, I found it interesting.
338032
It's called science fiction for a reason. Scientifically, everything in Stargate could happen (and I believe it will).
15897
Are they talking about black helicopters as well?\n\nOh, to answer your original question, teleportation is the movement of matter from one place to another without it going through the intervening area.  In other words, Star Trek stuff, also known as fiction.\n\nYou might check your sources to make sure they don't spur other BS like this.
1155083
Yes it's so possible. Computers will be smart enough to learn things themselves, and since they're computers they can organize, memorize everything and communicate with each other (computer) at light speed. They can control all other machines with their technical devices. They'll be so powerful.\n\n It will happen, but not anytime soon.
455699
there already are hover cars (just not yet in production).\nas for teleportation, i suppose it is not yet possible. think about it, existence is like a 4 dimensional coordinate system where the 3 dimensions (x,y,z) are dependent on the 4th coordinate, which is time. Right now, if we follow this 4d coordinate system, the whole function of existence would be continuous. The introduction of teleportation in this scenarion would cause the function of existence to be discontinuous, which would be very hard to explain. Put simply, it is really hard to drastically change the (x,y,z) coordinates as the time it takes for the change approaches zero (teleportation).
771444
I think so, It depends on which type of teleportation you are referring to.\n\nHere's a good resource for teleportation info:
56785
Yes, time travel is possible. :)\n\nIf you put a person in a rocket that can accelerate up to near light speeds on a round-about trip, when this guy comes back, he'd have aged much lesser than the guys who sent him. So he has travelled forwards in time.\n\nTravelling back in time is also possible. Oscilatting in time is possible. Time statis is also possible. All if we imagine a universe that has only a few elementary particles.\n\nHow? Well imagine a universe that has only a pendulum that swings back and forth. Now, we, as observers of this pendulum, can make the following observations, all different, and all "correct"\na. The pendulum is swinging back and forth as time advances\nb. The pendulum swings forth, then the direction of time reverses, and the pendulum goes back in time and swings back\nc. The pendulum is swinging forth and back as time retreats\n\nWhich of these is correct? We can't answer that question. So we can choose any one - it doesn't matter. These three are just different ways of looking at the phenomenon.\n\nYou may also want to read up about Feynman's diagrams
467849
I think that there is the theory that you could travel back in time, but it is really all Star Treckie.  I don't think there is any possibility of travelling back in time, no matter how fast you can go.
808107
It has allready been done. Particles have been 'transported' from one local to another. It happen ed when I wrote and answered this question, \n\ninformation was teleported, as were some atomic and sub atomic elements. \nRecent developments\n\nUntil recently, scientists had been able to transport only light or single atoms over short distances (millimeters). However, it was reported in October 2006 that Professor Eugene Polzik and his team at the Niels Bohr Institute at Copenhagen University in Denmark have made a breakthrough in the field.[3] Their experiment involved the transportation of information from one macroscopic atomic object containing thousands of billions of atoms to another, located half a meter away. The technique involved the use of quantum entanglement, quantum measurement and quantum feedback. Little information is available, however, which throws suspicion over what would otherwise be a great accomplishment.\n\n[edit] Davis report\n\nIn 2001, the United States Air Force commissioned Eric W. Davis, Ph.D., FBIS, to do a scientific study of teleportation.[4] The Davis report has been very controversial due to its recommendation of further studies of p-Teleportation:\n\n    A research program improving on and expanding, or implementing novel variations of, the Chinese and Uri Geller-type experiments should be conducted in order to generate p-Teleportation phenomenon in the lab.[4]\n\nThe report (page 2) classified teleportation concepts into five sections:[4]\n\nsf-Teleportation \n    "the disembodied transport of persons or inanimate objects across space by advanced (futuristic) technological means." The report does not further define sf-Teleportation, and has no further comment on it than to dismiss it from the scope of the report. This type of teleportation could use a physical connection between the two locations, such as a wire. Using existing technology, such as the Internet, or telephone lines, could be the means for this type of teleport. However, this means it would be extremely slow, since a typical living animal is approximately equal to 600YB (yottabytes). Compression could be utilized, but would have to be effective in keeping all data intact.\n\np-Teleportation \n    "the conveyance of persons or inanimate objects by psychic means."\n\nvm-Teleportation \n    "the conveyance of persons or inanimate objects across space by altering the properties of the spacetime vacuum, or by altering the spacetime metric (geometry)." This category includes the use of wormholes for transport, and the modification of the speed of light.\n\nq-Teleportation \n    "the disembodied transport of the quantum state of a system and its correlations across space to another system, where system refers to any single or collective particles of matter or energy such as baryons (protons, neutrons, etc.), leptons (electrons, etc.), photons, atoms, ions, etc." The report explicitly includes in this category a process essentially the same as that envisioned by the fictional transporters of Star Trek. It also includes quantum teleportation by means of quantum entanglement.\n\ne-Teleportation \n    "the conveyance of persons or inanimate objects by transport through extra space dimensions or parallel universes."\n\nThe report did not investigate sf-Teleportation other than to define it. The report recommended further study in all other types of teleportation (pages 28-29, 47-49, 54, 62).\n\n[edit] Teleportation scenarios\n\nThe use of teleportation as a means of transport for humans still has considerable unresolved technical and philosophical issues, such as exactly how to record the human body sufficiently accurately and also be able to reconstruct it, and whether destroying a human in one place and recreating a copy elsewhere would provide a sufficient experience of continuity of existence. Believers in the supernatural, such as religious people, might wonder if the soul is
1156662
No we cannot. The time travel stories are our over enthusiastic mind's work. It just cannot be possible. Unless we attain speed of light. Do u believe in relativity? think about it... maybe u will find answers there.
450925
I am not a Stargate Atlantis viewer.\nTry http://imdb.com/title/tt0374455/\nYou can discuss it more in depth here.
18539
100 years might be a bit quick, but I think this may happen faster than one might think at first.\n\nRay Kurzweil is a well-known predictor of technology trends and suggests that the technology to 'move' a person from their brain to an electronic replica will happen in the not-so-distant future. Once this is possible, the technology needed for interstellar flights will be greatly simplified because any approach to transport a human (as they currently live, in a biological body) would consume incredible resources just to provide an environment in which they could survive.
1128700
My first answer is probably not, because we would see future people by now.\n\nHowever, what if UFO's are time machines from the future?
137522
NOVA: Do you think that backwards time travel will ever be possible?\n\n\nSagan: Such questions are purely a matter of evidence, and if the evidence is inconsistent or insufficient, then we withhold judgment until there is better evidence. Right now we're in one of those classic, wonderfully evocative moments in science when we don't know, when there are those on both sides of the debate, and when what is at stake is very mystifying and very profound. \n\nIf we could travel into the past, it's mind-boggling what would be possible. For one thing, history would become an experimental science, which it certainly isn't today. The possible insights into our own past and nature and origins would be dazzling. For another, we would be facing the deep paradoxes of interfering with the scheme of causality that has led to our own time and ourselves. I have no idea whether it's possible, but it's certainly worth exploring.\n\nNOVA: Would you like it to be possible?\n\n \nSagan: I have mixed feelings. The explorer and experimentalist in me would very much like it to be possible. But the idea that going into the past could wipe me out so that I would have never lived is somewhat disquieting.
354085
Saw a documentary some time ago where they had managed to 'teleport' energy a couple of feet, so I guess it is may be a possibility at some stage.