Which would win in a fight to the death : an albatross or a rabid capybara ?
369304
anythin rabid would lose i'd think. unless it was fightin like a worm or somethin. (0_o)
974892
It would depend on where the battle took place. In the water, if the crab was big enough, it would win for sure. On land, no doubt the monkey would open up a can of whoop ass that the crab had never seen, lol. The monkey would have a nice seafood dinner at his expense. The monkey would grab a stick and commence the beatings, THANK YOU SIR MAY I HAVE ANOTHER!!!
556536
I disagree with everyone here.\n\nI think the lion would win. Which was also shown on a discovery channel show, I forget the name of the show...but they did mock fights with different animals. I don't know if itss till on the air.\n\nAnyway, a lion in the wild faces fights with other male lions over territory and family. But in the wild, a tiger rarely sees another tiger...they simply do not have the same skills a male african lion would have. A lion would win.
1039530
I say Spiderman. Batman can't compete with Spidey's strength and agility. Plus Spidey has his spider-sense, which can warn him about any of Batman's gadgets and if Batman is trying to attack him in the dark!
1147978
Garfield. I do like Bucky, but he always resorts to violence. Garfield would win in a non-violent confrontation.\n\nSplooch!
1076073
Possibly Rabies. A teenager here in Texas just died a month or so ago from a rabid bat coming in through his window and biting him while he was asleep.
1071983
Mila Kuniz or Jessica Alba.
851741
Definitely Batista!!!!! THE ANIMAL IS UNLEASHED!!!!!!!!
245091
bats. their young will cling to the mother's chest as she's in flight.
341330
Parrots ARE smarter than doves, but you're right about the muscles being the deciding factor rather than the brain. Given the sounds I've heard coming from both, parrots have more "agile" syrinxes than doves.
700767
a Wolf. Better to live alone and prey then follow others and be preyed upon.
810406
No contest!\n\nPolar bear would win every time. They are much bigger and really, really mean...
161088
The killer whale is so big that a shark would never be able to do any damage to it.  But at the same time a whale can't fight back.  So it would be a tie.
1100482
Goat and rabbit.  Goat never gives up, sheep has no stomach for a fight.  Squirrel can whip rabbit but goat, once sheep dealt with, claws or no, moves in.  The power of determination versus the power of claws.\n\nBrains comes in as well.  Sure, squirrel cleverer than rabbit, but sheep much stupider than goat.   Goat in the end.  Rabbit might not feel too good afterwards but goat doesn't care about teammates, only about winning.
889764
I wonder your appetite for wildlife in this single question. All your questions have answers on situation. \n1. Hippo is heavier and bulkier. It is one of the most dangerous animals to roam around. If a hippo and rhino fight in water, the hippo will easily easily easily win. But on land, rhino has the speed (force) and armour to give a very tough fight. I believe the rhino could win after a tough fight.\n\n2. There was a story recently in India that a tiger which wanted to feed on a new born elephant calf, killed its mother. This would have been a wonderful eco sight but it was found only on investigation. If this is the case, then I believe a lion can take down an african male elephant depending on these two situations. \na) both are alone \nb) if elephant is not alone, it should have a baby calf to guard. \n\nHope this gives some food for your thought.
704934
It's kind of a moot question since neither can fight each other in reality.  The tiger would definitely be out of his element in the ocean and would either be outclassed or drown.  On land, the shark would just flop around while it was being eaten alive maybe snapping at the tiger now and again.  If both animals were able to live in both environments, I would have to pick the shark.  On land, the shark's skin and body fat would protect him from the tiger's claws and superficial bites.  I say superficial because the tiger wouldn't be able to get his small mouth around anything on a shark but the fins.  In the ocean, the shark's superior swimming ability would simply leave the tiger in the dust or should I say a cloud of blood.  What do you think?
212060
Well, the teletubbies have a numbers advantage, but Barny could probably eat one.... hmmmm.... thats a good question. Then again, I'm pretty sure the teletubbies can shoot lasers out of their head from their anntenna.. Yeah I'm gonna go with the Teletubbies.