Did Bush really believe America would allow Jerry Falwell & Pat Robertson to save America?
361804
I did hear McCane say that on meet the press this morning and also admited that Bush has made some mistakes in Iraq.
58585
If you ask Bush he will say "Because God wants me to be president."  If you ask me, I think people were afraid to change the guard because of the war.  Basically, the American public said: hey, you guys messed up with this war thing but why don't you try and finish it anyway.  I am still shocked.
802712
I heard that one too the other day but it was 'what country would Jesus bomb?' - same thing though. Both get the point across that the Bush supporting evangelicals are fake Christians. I call them Bushians, Bush Christians.\n\nCan you believe there are still ppl trying to say that Iraq had something to do with 911? (answerer above me needs to read the 911 commission report)
421781
If the plan would have worked, then I'd say go for it, but it is not working.\n\nBush is a puppet for the wolfowitz doctrine and other high profile secret societies. He is not for the people, he is for corporations, and making money for him and his cronies. Not helping any of use Americans. Bush is a good puppet.
1011563
The following is an interesting little factoid you may interested in:\n\n \nJune 4, 2006 -- More on George W. Bush's "Sanctity of Marriage" gay marriage constitutional ban. \nGeorge W. Bush's marital problems have just taken another turn for the worse. Apparently, Mr. Bush has not only engaged in an extra-marital affair with a member of the opposite sex who is also a senior member of his Cabinet, but also a member of the same sex. WMR received the following  release this morning from Leola McConnell, Democratic candidate for Governor of Nevada (who has been endorsed by WMR). McConnell is a one-time professional dominatrix.\n"President Bush's speech to the nation Monday. If he doesn't say he's a gay American or at the least a bisexual one then he shouldn't be making one at all. And the notion that it would be in regards to writing bigotry into our nation's Constitution is reprehensible. Too bad it isn't me doing the rebuttal because in 1984, I watched him perform (with the enthusiasm of homosexual male who had done this many times before) a homosexual act on another man, namely Victor Ashe. Victor Ashe is the current Ambassador to the nation of Poland who should also come out like former Governor McGreevey of New Jersey and admit to being a gay American. Other homo-erotic acts were also performed by then private citizen George Bush because I performed one of them on him personally. \n\nI am the woman this website (bushssecretlifein84.tripod.com) speaks of that has been posted on the net nearly two years now. None of this would be the business of anyone but President Bush's little ruse to save his failed presidency by using DOMA [Defense of Marriage Act] to divide Americans one from the other has to be exposed as the act of a desperate closeted homosexual man. The only crime in being GLBT is in the hiding. The President needs to come clean with the American people about his own past sexual behavior before he tries to besmirch the humanity of people in search of sincerely committing to the same bonds of matrimony he's afforded. He violated his own vows of monogamy having a homosexual affair with a long time family friend of whom his wife had no knowledge. His hypocrisy seems to know no bounds. \n\nI had planned to run for governor of Nevada without going into any of this but his planned nationally televised address to the nation makes it necessary for me to address his attempt at division in as public a way as he picked to try this Bushification of reality regarding same sex marriages.\n\nSincerely,\nLeola McConnell\nLiberal Democratic candidate for Governor of Nevada\n --------------------------------------\nNow, aint this special!?
205884
Who said American's support him? \n\ncheck out the following link, it'll light up your world
73776
yes!!  \n\nTake a look at President Reagan.  He was given so much critisism for Iran Contra, Evil Empire, and Star Wars.  But look now, he's revered as a great man who caused the collapse of communism.  It's all about sticking to your beliefs and I think that's exactly what President Bush is doing.  There's always going to be critics.  But the smart people, the majority do see President Bush as doing a good  job.
187605
The destruction Bush has accomplished is no so much in the physical but in the philosophical aspect of this country.  Religious beliefs can be very influencing which is why they were separated from the government by The Framers of The Constitution.  Bush has repeatedly brought his Protestant beliefs into The White House and is proud to admit it.  Even worse than this is the use of "spin" and even Bush made news that T.V. station were paid to air.  The Bush administration has truly started America on a path away from US key values, away from The Constitution.
152650
I think that's the essence of the deception of the Bush administration and in many ways the entire republican party. That is, talking about Christian values while not really having any. Would Jesus wage war? What about "turn the other cheek"? Would jesus give tax cuts to the wealthy while ignoring the poor? Bush claims he's pro-life, but starting a war that causes thousands of innocent lives to perish is certainly not pro-life in my opinion. Probably one of the most devout christian presidents we have ever had is Jimmy Carter (a democrat). He has recently been very critical of Bush's presidency. I think his criticism is interesting because Carter himself, is a deeply religious man. I'm not a christian myself, but i have a tremendous amount of respect for christians who actually uphold christian values, but at the same time recognize the values of our constitution. I think Carter does an amazing job of balancing these and he's the role model of a true christian patriot. Bush is the exact opposite. He gives the Chrstian faith a bad name and he disrespects both the values of the Constitution and the Bible at the same time. It amazes me that most Christians think he's on their side. It simply amazes me.
1048497
Actually, your assumption is wrong. Most of the people of the world believe in some kind of supreme being or an afterlife.\n\nAs far as politics goes, I have this to say: Our elected representatives and 'leaders' don't seem to represent ALL of their people. In the case of Geo. W. Bush, he brings a more radical Christian perspective with him to office. That dictates his stand on the war, gay marriage, etc. He is not fulfilling his duty by representing the whole of the United States. He, like many of his kind, use a "majority rules" attitude, thereby inflicting his ideals on those who do not share his beliefs.\n\nEver heard of "separation of church and state"? Do you know what that means and what that implies? In our above example, it means that the President, elected members of Congress and the Senate should not be bringing their own, personal religious agendas to the table. They should be working for the common good of ALL our country's people. \n\nLikewise, prayer does not belong in public schools. Note I said PUBLIC schools because they are funded by the government and not, say, the Catholic Church. Private schools are allowed to have prayer because they are entities unto themselves and are not funded by the public trust.\n\nAs for "In God We Trust": You should probably understand that our "Founding Fathers" were highly religious people. Puritans to be exact. As such, they founded the United States as the direct result of their persecution in England. It is archane (at best) to say, "In God We Trust" because not everyone believes in God. They may believe in Allah, Buddha, Earth Mother, or may not believe in a god at all. That doesn't make them wrong. It just makes them different.\n\nMany people (not all) believe the "God" should be removed from our currency, from the Pledge of Allegance because "God" is not something that all peoples of the United States believe in. Constitutional ammendments allow us our freedom of religion (and thereby LACK of religion), so why make everyone else do when they do not want to do. That's like saying that everyone should eat peanuts -even if they don't like them, or - more deadly - if they're allergic.\n\nAs for times changing, you're right. Times are changing. It always has and it always will. Hemlines, dancing, music, attitudes towards the human body - all of it. It's called progress. We've moved on from witchhunts and spirits into understanding multiple personalities, seizures, and other conditions we once thought to be the work of the devil.\n\nDon't fear change. Try to embrace it. Or at least try to understand it. You don't even have to like it. While it may not be best for you, it doesn't mean that it's wrong for everyone. Whether that mean believing in a god, our differing political views, or our belief in UFOs.\n\nI hope you try to adjust peacefully.\n\nBest of luck.
898852
Without going all the way back to the 1970’s, the main suspects are:\nRichard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, and Douglas Feith. Throughout the 1980s and, especially, 1990s they advocated the use of America’s military might and premiere position in international politics to spread the American way life around the world.\n\nDuring the 1990s they pressured first President G.H.W. Bush and then President Clinton to take out Hussein and remake Iraq and its’ government in an American democratic image. Both Bush and Clinton were too smart to fall their stupid plan and so, at the time, it went nowhere.\n\nThen along came slow-thinking George and 9/11, and the stage was set for American disaster. Bush, with Cheney and Rumsfeld’s urging, decided to implement the neocons plan, convinced that it would secure his place in history (something that is even more of a driving force for Bush than for most ego-driven politicians).\n\nNot knowing, or caring to even learn, anything about the geopolitics of the Middle East (and Iraq in particular), and refusing to listen to experts (including Colin Powell and his won father), but claiming that God had told him it was a good idea, Bush went ahead with a plan that had no up-side fro America. \n\nInvading Iraq not only distracted America from pursuit of Bin-Laden and the others responsible for 9/11, but it was doomed to failure because of the realities on the ground.\n\nOf course, the neocons are now blaming Bush and the military for messing up their plan. As usual, however, they are wrong. Their plan never had a chance – no Middle East expert in the world gave Bush’s invasion more than a 50 percent chance of realizing any kind of success.
531458
I don't think Bush is really a Christian, I think he is blinded to truth. He is greedy, and  selfish, and cares not for the people of  America. I do think he is being used by God though, to bring about the downfall and destruction of America and usher in the New World Order and  ultimately the Antichrist.
740164
It wasnt the current Bush, it was his father, while running for President in 1988.\n\nWhat he actually said was " I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God."
754724
I can't speak for God but I can tell you this, Bush claims God himself instructed him to democratize the Middle East.\n\nNow my opinion on this matter is that is bologna. That he just had powerful friends instructing him.\n\nThen again, I can imagine Cheney with a microphone connected to some light fixture... giving instructions. LOL
185935
I beilve in God and I cannot say what God would do because I am only a flawed human and not perfect like God. I'm a sinner too.\n\nMankind is mostly selfish, ignorant, and very easily manipulated by God's enemy the devil.\n\nI can only hope that God would have mercy upon us all and forgive us all of us for our sins.\n\nI can image that God is most unhappy and upset with how we let material wealth and power become our love and not follow the path set before us to do whats just and to do HIS will. Most people in the world are on love with the ways of man and not the way of God...Bush is just one example of this\n\nBush is not perfect and is no saint. He in my opinion is a minon of the rich and powerful and serves no one but himself and his rich masters. \n\nAgain, I hope that Bush is smart enough to say to God; \n\n"I am sorry for being an selfish, lyiing, self-centered, un-humbel servant of the rich and powerful. Please forgive me for all the lives I destroyed of my fellow Americans and my fellow brothers and sisters around the world. \n\nI prended to care about others especailly the poor and powerless and I did not use my position or power to help those in need. My decisions, actions, and inactions caused the death and suffering of many countless people. Please show me mercy and forgive me for all my sins. I didn't mean to be an advocate for hate and fear." \n\n"Please forgive for using the ways of Satan to make the life of the rich and powerful easier at the expense of the poor and powerless. Please also forgive me Father for not being a true Christian and also please have mercy upon those people who blindly followed by evil eays. I tricked and lied to many people and many of the decisions I made were wrong and I made it seem like these actions I took were for the good of the world. God, please don't send me to the pits of Hell. I realize I was wrong and I admit it to you."\n\nIf President George Bush does when he meets God then I can say that maybe God will forgive him. If he doesn't and he acts like the self-rightous lying hypocrite then he more than likely burn in Hell like the terrorist that have killed so many people in HIS name.
277653
Its a myth to sell George Bush to Christian evangelicals. \nWith all due respect to Marvin Olassky (sp?), the author of this doctrine, even the evangelicals are unhappy with Bush's broken promises. Compassionate Conservative really means social Darwinism.  They'll toss a crust of bread to someone if  they will allow some proslytizing up front - but take funds out of secular social safety net programs.  Its the new theocracy.
204201
A lot of people do actually. Pat Robertson is the top mouth piece for the modern Pentecostal Revival. His is the kind that speaks in tongues and plays with snakes. And a great many people believe that their path is the ONLY path to salvation. Which is sad to think about, but horribly true. And a lot of the older Pentecostals think this country is headed down a spiral of sin, we need to be a Christian Theocracy, and the only way to stop Armageddon is to make sure everyone knows that theirs is the only true path to salvation.\n\nWhat's funny is that the Christian Right recently denounced Pat Robertson AND Jerry Fallwall.