can anyone scientifically prove creatisionalism?
357308
Charles Darwin explored exactly that when he wrote about his Theory of Evolution. Read his works!
722945
No, there is not. Parasychology is NOT a science.\n\nThere is no evidence that ghosts exist, thus as far as science is conscerned they are assumed not to exist. Obviously you can not learn about something that does not exist.
1018829
None that has been proven.
1074697
Yes I do, but as for showing proof how would you do that it would be kind of like proving that there is or is not a god.
1135844
I actually watched an excellent video on this in a college horticulture class (I want to assume it was NOVA, but I don't know). In this video, they had experiments set up by different men who claimed that plants are psychic, or that plants respond to prayer, or recognize people. Of course, even though these experiments got the results that were wanted (the plants that were prayed for did grow better, and the electrodes attatched to the plant did go beserk when the woman who smashed the neighboring plant walked by again), I think that there is not yet any way to really prove that plants have feelings. Not yet, anyway.
852147
it is not true\nbut i have no proof
1179547
I think we're all obliged to pass on all known facts, and all theories.\nAnd, theory is the correct choice of words for your question, IMO.\nSince neither can currently be absolutely proven nor disproven by 'scientific' standards, both of them are theories (or beliefs .. sets of information that meet personal criteria for acceptance).\n\nI lean toward God/Creation, myself. That trumps Big Bangs, etc. since God would have created that  :-)  (not that it matters to anyone but me!)
272532
Both exist... but there's no scientific proof of either. Its one of those "I just know" things...
499259
Yes it is possible.  If you want more proof you could just type that same question into google and it will pull up alot of articles supporting that fact.
397152
There have never been any documented, verifiable cases of telekinesis/psychokinesis.  \n\nThis points to the probability that telekinesis is not possible, and no one has been able to figure out even a theoretical basis that would make it possible, but doesn't totally rule out the existence of telekinetic ability.  \n\nJust makes it extremely, extremely improbable.
528263
The only thing that science can prove, is that the scrolls are of about the right date. No proof has been provided as to the truth of what's written on them. But then, the same can be said for all the scrolls in the bible too.
680846
there is no scientific proof as far as i know that soul really does exist.but many philosophers have plausible arguments in support of the existence of the soul.as far as our energy is concerned it simply changes form and gets converted to heat energy,chemical energy etc.
24794
Till now there is no confirmed research to prove this.Personally i dont think it is possible.
651960
... you don't have one.\n\nbut like any, the scientific method only allows for a hypothesis can only be disproved.
1076950
Scientific methodology and evidence.
403270
Yes, but try to get some proof first.
855974
neither exist... show me some proof.