Which one of your senses could you manage without?
362921
Taste for sure this way I can eat the stuff I hate that is good for you and I will feel and look better.
278647
We're limited by our imagination & what we can detect by our senses or tools
85414
Mute?\n\nProlly blind because i can still do a lot of stuff (as well as communicate)
954923
Hmmmmm....that's a very good yet tough question....Can I pick none of the above?  :)
945499
It means that your senses have become desensitized. \nYour morals have declined to the point that you have none.
676076
Mute, because I would miss being able to see my beautiful wife and watching her grow old with me.  i would miss seeing my son as he grows into a man.  I would never be able to see my grandchildren.  i would miss seeing the leaves in the fall, snow on trees, going birding, etc\n    I also feel that i would be much more of a burden on people if I was blind rather than mute.  I can always tell people I love them by writing them letter, signing to them, with my actions, hugs, and many other ways.\n   Just my thoughts. Peace and love
218984
you're still able to see, touch, taste or smell.. but you cannot feel anything........
210317
Great Question!  A Person who cannot smell are called an anosmaic
1055460
Nope. I can do without
1014116
Deaf.  I think I would feel less vulnerable that way.  Plus, if I learned sign language and/or lip reading, I would almost be able to compensate for my handicap.  However, with blindness, there is nothing you can easily do to bring any type of sight back into your life.  If blind, I would miss out on reading books (I don't think braille would be the same), watching the sunset and sunrise, watching the trees change color in fall, watching the new flowers bloom in spring, watching my loved ones grow up... Instead, I would be trapped in my own dark world.  No, deafness is definitely preferential.  Who cares about missing the sound of sirens, beeping traffic, swearing, screams of agony, fingers on a chalkboard...?
744274
sense of smell loss is refered to as - anosemia\nnot sure of the others
75406
like \n\nlife without sole\nlove without rose\nwork without pay\nsong without music\ncomputer without mouse
328454
In theory, I suppose you could live with\n\n1. Your brain\n2. Your heart\n3. 1 lung\n4. 1 kidney\n5. Your liver\n6. Some of your glands (not sure which one you absolutely need, probably the pancreas and pineal for sure)\n7. Some blood vessels and cappilaries to connect everything\n8. Enough of your spinal cord to connect everything.\n\nYou could go without skin I suppose, but you'd have to be in a clean environment, like the bubble boy. In that state, let's hope you didn't have any nerves, because every temperature change or slight breeze would cause you some nasty pain. Not to mention you'd dehydrate very easily. Of your head, all you really need is your brain, but you'll need at least a sac or part of your skull or something to hold it. It needs some fluid around it. Probably goes for your other organs too. If you're not moving around (and if this is how things are, you are NOT moving around), you probably don't even need your ribs.\n\nYou're going to need a nutrient tube or something to keep you alive, and probably a machine to breath for you too. For the feeding tube, at least a stomach might be necessary, but I'm not sure about that. I don't know if it's possible to feed nutrients directly into the blood stream.\n\nYou'd be deaf, blind, mute, and unable to feel, taste, or smell, but you could maintain a very precarious existence.\n\nIf you don't want machines or plastic bubbles keeping you alive, I'm afraid you're going to need most of your head and torso. All of your limbs, hair, eyes, ears, nose, lips, nipples, etc, can all be removed though. Removing large amounts of skin leaves you incredibly vulnerable to infection, so you'll probably end up keeping that. But you can still lose some organs! You probably don't need all your glands or remaining bones, and in addition you can drop a kidney, a lung, your spleen, your appendix, at least half your stomach, a large portion of your intestines, your testes or pretty much all your female reproductive organs, depending on your sex, and any excess fat or connective tissue not holding anything necessary in place. Sorry, guys need a penis to excrete waste, so we have to keep it if we are staying away from devices to keep us alive. This would still be a pretty precarious life, and not a lot of fun to be, or be around. You wouldn't be very healthy at all, and probably wouldn't live very long.\n\nSo if you got on a scale and tossed body parts to the other side until you were at absolute limit before you couldn't take away any more and still be alive, I'd say the scale would certainly tip towards the pieces you removed. Your limbs alone would go a long way toward doing that.
471711
It is when you are deprived of one or more of your senses typically blindfolded and the partner tries not to make noise. Some times they also tie the person so he/she can't use their hands (getting stimulation by touch). This makes you more aware of your other senses, specially touch, but also could be smell or taste. \n\nIt is different, not necessarily better or worse, a good experience
961081
Reproductive system we can live without entirely.\n\nMost other systems we need but can do without bits of:\n\neg. Neurology: we can live without vision, hearing, smell, taste
155626
I guess I'd say smell just because with the other ones you could live pretty normal. Without your sight it would be really hard to get used to it and live,without your hearing you would have to use sign language and that would be a pain because you have to talk a lot,usually.I still think tasting and touching would also be better because you have to eat,but I mean smelling also has an effect on your taste.Also touching I qould want more becuase you wouldn't feel pain or know when too much hurt is too much.
295223
I would have to say an anosmic. Anosmia is loss of sense of smell, I think...