Trig: Fox Population Problem?
365048
1. Sorry, but I can't draw a graph on Yahoo! Answers.\n\n2. t = time, 600 (subtract 200 from 800), (subtract 2.9 from 5.1), -200 (subract 800 from 200).\n\n3. # of foxes = t (number of foxes added each year)\n\n4. Divide 5.1/2.9, then multiply the total number of foxes added per year and multiply it by 7, 0, 9.5, 2, or whatever number to get the fox population for that year.\n\nGood luck! :)
1135408
OH NOES THIS IS LIKE A MATH PROBLEM!!!! i can't handle any more variables :( sry.\n\n\nhahahaha.
758583
dP/dt = 0.069762e^(0.011t) * 10^9\n\nSince I think the population should be in billions of people per year.
499158
The red fox (Vulpes vulpes)is not endangered and in fact lives in a higher population density in cities than people are aware.\n\nTwo color variations exist which include silver (gray or blackish in color, sometimes completely black) and cross foxes (grayish color and darker stripe that looks like a cross, hence the name) and are always identified by their distinctive white tipped tail.  These color variations can be rare even though the species is thriving.
575459
Sorry but I don't quite understand your qn.\nCan you make it clearer?\n\n(to ozert:\ncos A and sin A could be negative values if tan A is in Quadrant 3)
124804
For an uncertainty x of 0.01 (which your 99% accuracy would be) you need 1/x^2 samples which would be 10000.  This is true for a large population (>>10000).  I believe you still need that many for 20000 population but am only 99% sure.\nSource: Best recollection of a stat course 50 years ago.
1075715
Here are two sites that look into the problem:\n\nhttp://www.kw.igs.net/~jackord/bp/f6.html\nhttp://math.fullerton.edu/mathews/N310/projects/e6.htm
154373
http://forums.prospero.com/foxsimpsons/start/
322159
Are you kidding me? Sin(x) is awesome! I totally love sinx-ing  those sexy numbers :)\n\nI sinxed pi the other day, and it totally melted away.
373411
7.257276\n\nhttp://www.go.ednet.ns.ca/~larry/astro/HR_diag.html
342766
go to the open darwin community. They may be able to help you.
365741
I think all you have to do is plug in a few values for C to get a graph.  For example, try 0, 5, 10, 15, 20.  It's continuous so you can connect the dots.\n\n(0,0), (5,87.5), (10,350), (15,787.5), (20,1400)\n\nTotal labor for 20 is 1400.
283145
One point of confusion: do you mean the regular inverse trig functions or the inverse hyperbolic trig functions? The first is written "arctan x" and the second is written "arctanh x". Either way, the solutions are very similar.\n\nTo see the problem worked out for the regular trig functions, click on the first link below. (I rendered the work as a graphic...this is nearly impossible to visualize with just text). If the graphic doesn't display right in your browser, that's because the browser shrunk it to fit. Just click it to see regular size or download the link to your desktop and view it there.\n\nIf you meant the inverse hyperbolic functions, I also explain in that link how to adjust for that.
806376
an enormous number..!!!\ncalculator gave up
418192
try this\n\nhttp://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_139058.htm\n\nlet me know if it works
684466
Wikipedia says 'billions of decimal places'. I think there are computers continuing to calculate it at the moment so the answer is different now than it will be in 15 minutes when you need it!\n\nhttp://www.angio.net/pi/piquery has 200 million. Enough for now?
171835
estimated world population at time of post 6,593,337,406 as per http://www.ibiblio.org/lunarbin/worldpop\n\nmultiplied by ten = 65,933,374,060\n\nthat's my guess