Does anyone know how the annual rate of population increase would be affect without immigration?
364785
Currently \nThe ILLEGAL Immigrants In Our Nation Comprise 5 Percent Of The Workforce\n\nThe UNEMPLOYMENT Rate Is 4.7 Percent\n\nYOU Do The Math
265552
US economy will increase with following advantages:\n\n1. Fine of 2000 dollars for two million people.  Lot of money!!\n2. We will get tax for last five years, and also for next ten years.\n3. Price for apples will stay same.  Price to cut grass will stay same.  Home prices (construction) will stay same.\n\nRepublicans argue that what is the gurentee that another million will not come to US?\n\nI want to ask them what is the gurentee that woman won't be raped after imposing tough laws?  what is the gurentee that murder won't happen?\n\nIf god can't give gurentee of that, who are you to ask for alien's gurentee?\n\nBackground check must be done to identify criminals.  US has more advatage that aliens.\n\nGuest-worker is a good program, but conservtatives want votes, so they will never approve it.
330854
40.50% increase in population
789712
Let x be the number of years.\nLet n be the amount of increase in people\nLet p be the initial population in year "0"\n\nf(x) = p + n(x/10)\n\nFor example, if you had 100,000 people, and it increases by 10,000 people every 10 years, your equation would be:\nf(x) = 100,000 + 10,000(x/10)\n\nThis can be simplified to an increase of 1,000 every year.\nf(x) = 100,000 + 1,000x
710620
Try sifting through these sites:\n\nhttp://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2005-18,GGLD:en&q=US+immigration+rates\n\nhttp://search.yahoo.com/search?search=US+immigration+rates&ei=UTF-8&fr=ks-ans&ico-yahoo-search-value=http%3A%2F%2Frds.yahoo.com%2F_ylt%3DAps0mcqPHW2uZLPIw3dW2HYazKIX%2FSIG%3D111gjvvgj%2F*-http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fsearch&ico-wikipedia-search-value=http%3A%2F%2Frds.yahoo.com%2F_ylt%3DAsfTiAfilWKLldjhroFU8uEazKIX%2FSIG%3D11ia1qo58%2F**http%253a%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSpecial%253aSearch&p=US+immigration+rates\n\nIt's called RESEARCHING the internet ;) :D
539442
If all parts are implemented, I think it will make illegal immigration much harder to get away with in the future.  However, legal immigration will be greatly increase. I guess the net difference will be that it will be easier to keep out criminals and terrorist suspects, and will be easier to track and police immigrants in our country.\n\nMy problem is the gap in time before the infrastructure is in place.
363148
Problem #1: Population \n\nThe first problem I see with the current state of the immigration laws is the significant rise in population that has, and will, continue to occur over the next fifty years. According to the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), an estimated 1.1 million immigrants, both legal and illegal, enter the United States every year. 700,000 of these are legal immigrants; 120,000 are refugees, and between 250,000 to 300,000 are undocumented or illegal “aliens” ( Baldwin, 1995). The United States population at the moment is roughly 288 million people. If this trend of aliens is not decreased, the population will reach 400 million by 2050. How many people can America hold? \n\nProblem #2: Benefits Illegal Aliens Recieve \n\nCurrently, under federal law, undocumented foreign citizens are eligible for emergency healthcare, free schooling from kindergarten through high school, and W.I.C. or Woman, Infants, and Children nutritional program ( Baldwin, 1995). This is important to note because there are currently between eight and ten million aliens currently living illegally in the United States. An estimated 2.5 million of these illegal aliens currently reside in the state of California alone, due to the agricultural jobs that are readily available for cheap labor (Kadetsky, 102). It should not be surprising then that the residents of California were outraged over the amount of money that they were being forced to spend, and the amount of resources that were being used to support aliens that are not “allowed” to be in the United States in the first place. \n\n \n\nProblem #3: Homeland Security\n\nIn the Fiscal year of 2002, which runs October 1 through September 30, the United States Coast Guard, which is the country’s primary maritime, or sea going, law enforcement agency, intercepted 4104 immigrants from various South American countries (USCG, Para 2). Since then, the numbers of immigrants intercepted by the Coast Guard, has continued to climb at an alarming rate; jumping to almost 11,000 in 2004, 9,500 in 2005, and currently with less than two months into the 2006 physical year, there have already been 1,000 migrants accounted for and processed through the Coast Guard (USCG, Para 1). Illegal immigration can potentially cost American tax payers billions of dollars a year. The United States Coast Guard, whose primary obligation is to prevent the loss of life at sea, can not stop this problem by its self, it is mearly the first line of defense. It is up to the rest of America to join the fight and help put an end to this awful practice.\n\n\nthanks cherokee rose i put my signature on  petition you rock
959712
Amnesty for 30 million illegals making it possible for 120 million more of their family members to come here. All accepting jobs at the new minimum wage, which will in turn cause price adjustments across the board, businesses will fold or not be able to hire, and we will be stuck with them all on welfare.(One example)
586254
Better technology and medicine is a given. Gas prices will probably be higher. People will continue to complain about the economy but no one will do anything about it. We'll have a different president (the way things are going now, probably a Democrat), but we'll still have troops over in Iraq. TV shows like "The Simpsons" and "Friends" will continue to be on reruns every other hour. Americans will continue their dieting craze, but won't stop eating fast food. More doomsayers will emerge, just as people did right before Y2K. And as for resolving the immigration issue, I really have no idea...
494002
It will be devastating to the USA because of Family Unification/Chain Migration better known as bring in the Village. \nThe USA will increase its population from 300 million today to between 400 million to 1/2 billion in 20 Years. 40% poverty.\nhttp://www.heritage.org/research/immigration/wm1076.cfm\nCheck it out.
471202
Very bad...I sonetimes wonder if we have methods of indirect populatin control....attacks..diseases..cause their are only so many resources.....for so long...\n\nAnd with the rate of growth..its going to be interesting in 30 years..
539579
The population growth rate is about 85,000 per year..
357625
The situation appears dire for the united states of America. Trends suggest that by 2026 there will be more immigrants entering the states than there are citizens every 3 years. Although the policy of removing immigrants is currently achieving results of exporting around 1 million per year these numbers are vastly outweighed by the organized crime syndicates finding ways of getting even more in. advice: lock up your daughters. Good luck America.
265072
No, it doesn't change it.  The crude birth rate is the number of births per 1000 people, it doesn't include infant mortality.
524714
Impact of amnesty proposals on Illegal Alien numbers \nhttp://www.theamericanresistance.com/ref/illegal_alien_numbers.html#howManyIl...\n\nOn January 9, 2004, President Bush proposed a guest worker program - a thinly veiled amnesty for illegal aliens. \nA February 29, 2004, Fox News article subsequently stated that from 50 percent to 90 percent of illegal aliens apprehended claimed they were coming here for the "amnesty" (their words). One Border Patrol officer stated that "They believe that they are only responding to an invitation." \nShortly thereafter, the Border Patrol was ordered not to collect this information. \n\nWord of the amnesty had spread far beyond Mexico. \nApprehensions included Nicaraguans, Brazilians, Venezuelans, Ecuadorians, Chileans, Chinese, Pakistanis, and East Indians. \n\nBy June, 2004, U.S. Border Patrol official statistics revealed that there had been 135,468 apprehensions along the southwest border during April 2004,  an 80 percent increase when compared to April 2003. A May 23, 2004, New York Times article stated that after a 4-year drop,  apprehensions were are up 30 percent over 2003 apprehensions along the entire southern border,  with 660,000 people detained from October 1, 2003 through the end of April, 2004. \n Representative Kolbe testified that 155,000 people had been apprehended along the Arizona border in the first three months of 2004. \n\nAlthough correlation does not necessarily imply causation, it seems reasonable to presume a relatively modest 25 percent increase in illegal aliens starting January 15, 2004,  through the rest of the year as a result of the "guest worker" proposal.  This 25 percent is a conservative estimate of the increased flow of illegal aliens into the U.S. as a result of President Bush's amnesty proposal. In fact, official Border Patrol apprehension statistics show that total 2004 apprehensions as of June 30, 2004  represent  A 190 PERCENT INCREASE  over total 2003 apprehensions.\n\n\nShort Answer: Granting Amnesty Will Only Result In An EXPONENTIAL INCREASE To The Problem We Have\nWe Should Drop This Addiction COLD TURKEY
543939
On the increase...but still very small in comparison to other large cities.\n\noops...crimes or actual deaths ? (old age.etc.)\n\nThere :www.fin.gov.on.ca/english/demographics/demog05.html -\n\nGood thinking riddnidds !
1185862
Because the number of illegal aliens can only be estimated, similarly the fiscal cost (government budget outlays) for those aliens can only be estimated. Dr. Donald Huddle, a Rice University economics professor, published a systematic analysis of those costs as of 1996. The study also estimated the tax payments of those same aliens. \n\nAt that time, the illegal alien population was estimated to be about five million persons. The estimated fiscal cost of those illegal aliens to the federal, state and local governments was about $33 billion. This impact was partially offset by an estimated $12.6 billion in taxes paid to the federal, state and local governments, resulting in a net cost to the American taxpayer of about $20 billion every year. This estimate did not include indirect costs that result from unemployment payments to Americans who lost their jobs to illegal aliens willing to work for lower wages. Nor did it include lost tax collections from those American workers who became unemployed. The study estimated those indirect costs from illegal immigration at an additional $4.3 billion annually. \n\nDuring the years since that estimate, the illegal alien population is estimated to have roughly doubled, so the estimated fiscal costs also will have at least doubled. Furthermore, the passage of time is accompanied by inflation in the costs of services, e.g., school budgets continue to climb. Therefore, what was estimated to be a cost to the American taxpayer of $33 billion in 1996 today would be at least $70 billion. Similarly, tax collections would have increased — sales taxes at least — so that the net expense to the taxpayer from illegal immigration would currently be at least $45 billion. The indirect fiscal costs would have also increased, especially during a period of already high unemployment, to perhaps and additional $10 billion annually.