Who really destoryed the WTO and why was the official story never questioned?
368225
who did it? well it wasnt the butler in the hallway wilh a candlestick. how many different arab leaders are there in U.A.E.?i wouldnt know.however, it had to be a terrorist group of the arab world. look at the names listed they were all arabic.as for the official story, what we read and saw on the tube was as official as it gets.information concerning this tragic day possibly was edited just to be on the safe side. what i mean is that the story probably had more to it than what was said ,but with the turmoil in the world today, the increasing price of oil and fingers pointed at everyone, why say anything to start trouble? personally i dont think our country is the most advanced in defense or technology.our computers are made up of japans experts and as far as i know our defense systems are made with the same technology. i think there a a few small nations in the world that have come a long way as we have but secrets must be kept.hopefully im wrong but,i have read and surfed the web,i had found many items of interest that are questionable.im not a trouble maker and i think any information gotten will be sufficient enough to sustain my curiosity. i served during vietnam and i enlisted and would do it again. this country is my home and i was proud to serve.
502164
im not sure which country sent stuff but i do remember hearing that the U.S. rejected alot of stuff. i believe it was russia or maybe england
370505
Many countrys used to use protectionist policys to tax imports of stuff which undercut there own important industries. Other countrys respondid with simmilar measures, eventualy ensuring very little was traded between the main Empires of the day.
916923
The big lie continues.  We still can't get anyone to agree if torture is unAmerican.  It typifies our times when people like this just get shouted down, protests are not known to have happened, and 600,000 dead Iraqis is not genocide.  In ancient China a story read "a poor man will hang for stealing a loaf of bread, but when you steal the country, you are declared "Statesman of the Year."  It is hard to choose, it has taken courage for them both to speak out.  Good question.
1088005
Good question! Twin Towers (Saddam WAS linked to these MURDERS of innocent people when they discovered Al Quida training camps in Iraq near the Iranian borders); how many violations of the UN resolutions? So many I can't remember, but more then 12 that I know of; reports of WMD's, which whether you believe it or not, that had to be answered by force since the UN is a gutless piece of work, so corrupt that the French and Russians were making millions off the humane efforts of the United States who nearly funded all the monies for the "Food Program". Of course these funds were never used by Saddam to feed his people, he was to busy killling them by the hundreds of thousands while French politicians were getting millions. Hello, anyone home yet! Crimes of humanity not unlike Hitler. Remember him..and you know what, Hitler never  bombed the US but we still took him out. Does anyone ever ask WHY? Oh ya, the Palestinians and the President of Iran and Saddam. Hitler was their HERO...but he was an infidel too...go figure. Guess it comes down to madness. Even Saddam's generals thought he had WMD's because that is what Saddam wanted everyone to believe. Well, he got his wish...we believed him. I Wish he had died in that hole but my wish didnt come true.Women raped, children killed, wifes ravaged in front of their families for the pleasures of sons of Saddam, mass burials of innocent Iraqis who did not like their President (what a joke, president); using WMD to kill 300,000 Kurds; These are some of the reasons we are in IRAQ and if the damn politicians would let the military act like the military then this war would be over. If we entered WWII like this, we would be speaking German or Japanese. Truman was right, the US should never enter a war without using all it's might and power to defeat the enermy in a short, unrelenting manner and then return home. Unfortunately we have a bunch of weak politicians in office and a nation of sheep that follow their good shepards right into the gates of hell. Wake up America, the world is not what it used to be and Muslims want us all dead. Got it now.
174651
Because the U.N. had no such authority. Not to mention that "petelikesmail" is totally correct in his post above. The U.N. is a complete joke and ignores when real atrocities happen. When known human rights abusers are on the human rights committie, how could your trust them?
1170008
Because the wife of the president of Iceland was delayed at an Israeli airport over passport issues and it was taken as a diplomatic offense.  And it's questionable whether there was a door slam or not, depends who's telling the story... right?
680406
I think a lot of it is the facist regime that we call an administration has people and the media so scared to tell the truth and call a lie a lie that nothing gets reported.\n\nHere is a link to the Vid of Steven Colbert's report.\n\nhttp://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/04/29.html#a8104
530044
because the building was brought down by demolition experts, using explosives evenly placed around the building.\n\ndont tell me that you actually believed the official story.\nit was to create the opertunity to change the law ,to install more control.\njust as Hitler did before the seccond world war
87697
Yes, he does - the story was kept pretty quiet by the media, see the explanation below.
5926
Heck, after the oil-for-food scandal,  The fact that UN igores Africa why does anyone have any respect for the UN.\n\nNo they should you can't trust the UN
55683
He didn't lie,The invasion was based in part on foreign intelligence reports. As for the "Illeagal" war\n\n As much as people may hate the idea, but yes the war is legal under Article 1441, Acting under Chapter VII (articles 41 & 42)of the Charter of the United Nations.\n\nArticle 41: The Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be employed to give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon the Members of the United Nations to apply such measures. These may include complete or partial interruption of economic relations and of rail, sea, air, postal, telegraphic, radio, and other means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations.\n\n\nArticle 42\nShould the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations.\n\nThese are the two articles that the United States and Britain used to enforce the existing cease fire agreement. I used the term "cease fire" because no actual peace treaty signed,and hostilities could resume at anytime. \nSource(s) \nhttp://www.un.int/usa/sres-iraq.htm...\n\nhttp://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/chapte...
262742
The Chinese, without much doubt. However, some believe it was the Japanese. You can read more about it in the links below, and then decide for yourself.\n\njdmorningreport
422648
It wasn't.  Clinton inherited a clean slate from his predecessor.  The next time go to WalMart and see everthing there made in China, thank BJ Clinton. He made the godless Chinese "most favored trading partners".  He sent your jobs to Mexico(NAFTA), he anmestied 93,000 illegal Mexicans (letting them keep the US jobs they'd already stolen), encouraging the present flood of criminal entrants.
481284
no, I don't.  because people in poorer countries don't hear or see anything about the common Joe or Jane.  all they hear is what's in the news, "US bombs this"..."US barring trade with...".  Most of the world hears what the president and his cronies are up to...which is what most of us want.  we are poorly misrepresented actually.
967947
We'll never know the truth-a lot of records needed are sealed until 2050. Seems there's something they don't want us to know. There's so many theories and I know someone did murder the President besides Oswald. To make it more confusing, I saw some stuff on LBJ-there's a video of his mistress of 20 years that was pretty believable. And documents to back that up. I know there were plenty that didn't like JFK and it was probably a combination of theories. The LBJ theory has a few points in its' favor. LBJ was part of a powerful wealthy group of mostly Texas Oil guys. Some interesting names that include Nixon. LBJ became president and the oil guys got some handsome oil subsidies that JFK wanted to get rid of. There are those(including McNamara, JFK's Defense secretary) that felt JFK would never have escalated Vietnam. To make it weirder,, Bobby Kennedy probably would have been President in '69 but was also assasinated, and Nixon became President instead. I'll watch the other video-seems big oil sure could've been a factor.
334850
There are 2 sides:\n\n(1) Its base was weak and it fell when disturbed by the collapse of the other buildings.\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center\n\n(2) Private and illegal government information was in the building.  And though, the building endured minimal damage, the government decided it would be better to demolish it.\nhttp://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html\n\nNeither has been proven.