Has anybody seen the film "What the bleep do we know", if so what did they think of it?
367498
As a scientist I found it interesting and thought-provoking, and a way of bringing people to some questions.
365813
Yes, I have seen Stay Alive and I was pleasantly surprised. I waited two weeks after it came out and read peoples' responses on Yahoo Answers. Most of the people said it sucked, but my boyfriend wanted to see it so we went. Like I said, I was surprised because everyone said it was bad, but my boyfriend and I really liked it. \n\nI guess it depends on the individual, because a lot of people liked The Hills Have Eyes and I thought it was STUPID!!!!
831636
This movie was a beautifully created film.  The cinematography alone made it well worth the cost of a ticket.  The costuming was beautiful, artful and relatively authentic.  As long as you are/were willing to sit through the length of the movie, it was very well done.\n\nI do agree that the use of a Chinese actress versus a Japanese actress was not the brightest call, but unfortunately, most Americans really don't recognize the differences (very sad, but also true.)\n\nI loved the story, though now that I have it on DVD, I tend to skip over the beginning where she's a child (except for the flavored ice scene - it's just beautiful).  I really love watching the development of the characters.\n\nWhile a lot of people think it isn't worth renting over and over again, let alone owning, I see it as a beautiful rendition of a lost part of history.  And to think - the book was written by a man! Go figure!
234661
i saw the movie and loved it!!\n\nmemories!!!
1104562
I have. I enjoyed it very much. It was great to see many spiritual concepts being shown and discussed in a movie, a rare treat these days. I had to watch it twice to digest it all.
953629
Wow that was an amazing movie,--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\n\n\n \nI'm the first to admit that I get a little sappy when writing about Dead Poets Society. I first saw the film during my senior year of high school, and 16 years later it's a movie that is still with me, one that I go back to time and time again.\n\nThere's a little bit of formula at work here: A stuffy rep school, 1950s, a collection of impressionable young boys, and a teacher that will change their lives. But there's something at work that turns what could have been a forgettable, droll piece of saccharine storytelling into a classic. Part of it is Robin Williams as Mr. Keating, a young English teacher that uses poetry to teach them how to "Sieze the day," to suck the marrow out of life, as Thoreau put it.\n\nThe poetry angle is an interested and unexpected one. And writer Tom Schulman and director Peter Weir have no confusion that the idea is a little corny. Putting a kid in front of the class, covering his eyes, and forcing him to free associate until he comes up with a verse about Walt Whitman? Sounds ridiculous, but it works. In fact, it's one of the most powerful scenes in the film.\n\nThat's because the kids in the film are just as good as Williams is here. Robert Sean Leonard is the ostensible star as Neil, a deeply repressed lad who's the class president type yet dreams of doing something artistic, despite the insistence by his father (Kurtwood Smith) that he become a doctor. And then there's roommate Todd Anderson (Ethan Hawke), an intensely shy young man who's attending Welton Academy for the first time this year and will be memorably brought out of his shell, fighting all the way, by Keating. The other students of note -- Josh Charles as a lovesick kid and Gale Hansen as the unforgettable rebel "Nuwanda" -- are equally apt.\n\nUltimately the film revolves around Neil's story, when he decides for the first time to defy his father and act in a local play -- as Puck, in A Midsummer Night's Dream, of all things. This leads to a series of catastrophic events that culminates in (spoiler alert from here on out) Neil's suicide and the scapegoating/firing of Keating for it.\n\nAt once uplifting and emotionally crushing, there's no way to leave this movie without wanting to somehow improve your life and follow Keating's advice by seizing the day. Every time I watch the film I'm compelled to complete some lingering project, plan a trip, move into a new house, or do something unforgettable. Weir's direction perfectly captures the 1950s mood -- an era of repression just on the verge of breaking wide open -- and Williams manages to keep his mania in check for the bulk of the film, trotting out an impression here or there when the story requires it.\n\nIn recent years, Dead Poets Society has become a curious platform for deconstruction and revisionism. Viewers wonder, among other things, whether Neil was so troubled because he was secretly gay. Whether Keating might genuinely be guilty of contributing to his death. Whether "Sieze the day" isn't such a great motto after all. I'm not actually supporting any of these ideas per se, but the latter-day ruminating gives the film more weight than you might otherwise think, and it makes the movie all the richer for it. \n\nI Give it 4 out of 5 stars lol
814689
Is this a question or an advertisement?\n\nGlad a film totally changed your life.\nBetter be careful what else you watch.\n\n\nI thought it was interesting, but it didn't rock my foundations....\n\nMar 14, 2006 - New York Times - New York, NY (Newspaper)\nFar Out, Man. But is it Quantum Physics? by Dennis Overbye \n\nCan physics save your soul? Two years ago, a movie with the unpronounceable title "What the #$!%* Do We Know!?" became an underground new-age phenomenon, raking in $11 million out of midnight screenings and word of mouth, spawning an industry of books, tote bags, clothing, DVD's and "biofield" jewelry. It purported to argue, based on the insights of modern quantum physics, that reality is just a mental construct that we can rearrange and improve, if we are enlightened or determined enough. Science and spirituality have tied the knot, and the world is your infinitely deformable apple. This winter an expanded version, "What the Bleep, Down the Rabbit Hole," began to play to audiences who say that the movie confirms what they already thought about the cosmos, some vibe they had that it is a slippery, woo-woo-woo kind of place. The movie just finished a two-month run in New York and is to be shown in May at the Quest for Global Healing Conference, in Ubud, Bali, with luminaries like Walter Cronkite and Desmond Tutu attending.
451954
one of the greastest movies. it is a classic. it is a movie that will never go away. i love this part....\nstupid worthless no good g$d damn freeloading son of a \nb$%^h. retar$$% a$$hole know it all jerk....and it goes on and on...
597095
Have you seen that movie yet?  I saw it yesterday.\n\ndoes that help?
525331
I have read the book and I just saw the movie last night. I am a christian; however, I have read scripture and other religously based works, both fiction and non-fiction regarding almost every known religion in the world. I am a christian by choice, not because it is the only religion I have ever been exposed to or know anything about. \n\nThat said, I loved the book and thought the movie was way underwritten. Definately worth seeing, but the screenplay was terrible and character development was absent. How, people knew what they knew and when they knew it was absurd. And the stupidity (you don't have to let everyone know about your change in flight plans immediately after you decide to change them. You don't buy train tickets on a credit card when your running from the cops....) started to get annoying. The movie sped up when it should of slowed down and left things in that could have been omitted. On the other hand it also had a kindergardenish way of over explaining when it should have moved on (like the mansion scene). This may be okay for those who haven't read the book or aren't aware of who Mary Magdalene was.\n \nI didn't think it was boring, but I'm into this kind of material a lot. As for the fictional/nonfictional status. definately fictional, and I don't say this because it conflict with the Holy Bible whose origins and completeness have its own host of questions. To me, it just doesn't make sense for God to leave a bloodline through Jesus.  It makes sense for Jesus to have a wife or a 'companion' as much as it makes sense for any Jewish carpenter to have a wife. Was this fact entirely omited during the assembly of the Holy Bible???? Possibly.  Just one of many questions. I think the Da Vinci Code is a 'what if' type of work that does not try to affend anyone, but have fun with this question.\n\nI'll tell you what....What if...through DNA testing they found out that Mohammed suffered from severe BiPolar disorder? Imagine the Hoopla that movie would stir.\n\nExplore life...spread peace.
641191
hi, yes i have seen the Da Vinci Code, and i agree with Professer Drex - it is very good despite what a lot of people have said about it. if you like this kind of film, go and see it. if you have read the book already, be prepared..it may not be exactly as you expect it to be....you know what they say about a film based on the book...although i haven't read the book yet..\nbut it is still great and so is Tom Hanks....enjoy!\none more thing, it may seem boring to some people because it doesn't have as much action as some films i.e MI3etc, only because it isn't that sort of film but just as mysterious. it does have some exciting bits, if a little predictable at times, but with a twist at others.....
1030523
"If you could see what I hear".  \n\nA fantastic movie about the life of entertainer Tom Sullivan.\n\nI laughed, I cried. I loved it. But not many others did.\n\nIt stars Marc Singer (Beastmaster and televisions "V"), Shari Belafonte and RH Thompson\n\nYou might find info on it on IMDB.  It was on video many many years ago, but I haven't been able to find it on DVD.  \n\nThanks for making me bring that up again!  If you get a chance, its a wonderful watch!
177243
I loved it.\n\nI've heard that even people who never saw the movie "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" also liked it.
206931
I hear you Asif, I really enjoyed the film but was not blind to its flaws. \n\nFirstly the story is more disjointed than the graphic novel on which its based as the film had to fit a decent time. \n\nYou dont get to understand the eye, the ear, the finger and the head. You don't understand how the fire at Larkhill started, then you would appreciate the Scarlett Carson rose connection even further. You don't understand how V has access to the core of the system. \n\nSecondly, from a visual point of view the film used the same cues as the Matrix series which is almost a bit cliched now. \n\nBefore the dictatorship has normal colour, the present day is saturated with blue. The shadow gallery and Detrich's house are warmer coloured. \n\nBullet time is used in the action sequences and jars with the style of the comic which portrays violence in a much more real way. \n\nWhilst V has a very powerful message the film stayed less true to the comic than the likes of Hell Boy and Sin City. \n\nInstead of the Guy Fawkes intro if the real factors that catalysed Moore and Lloyd to write the novel were listed (the miners strike, the cold war, the palpable fear of AIDS and the homophobia that went with it, the race riots of the early 1980s) rather like the the intro to Star Wars then it would have made more sense.\n\nIt was also jarring for UK media to see the UK portrayed as being run by a pious leadership as we are secular country in comparison to the US.\n\nLastly and most importantly, Alan Moore asked for his name to be removed from the film. This communicates the wrong message to reviewers, after all Moore allowed his name to be associated with The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen film, which truly was dreadful.
546279
I just came back from the theater myself....I was kind of dissapointed, it lacks of the surprise factor of the book and the way the clues a presented in a way that the reader can become part of the solving of the riddle, on the contrary, on the film, the  \nriddles are solved in a very obvioud way it seems unreal..it is an average film but surely it will become a big blockbuster due alll the buzz it has generated.
314535
I found it shocking, disturbing and compelling. They say you know the truth when you here it; well it all seems to ring true. Some have mentioned it as propeganda. No. Its a dangerous documentary that has used facts, COMMON SENSE and many many eye witnesses and footage. I for one found it quite disconcerting to know that it was a set-up. Look at what the Bush administration has used it to aid? Afganistan and Iraq, the deaths of thousands, more genuine terrorism including in  countries that have backed America in this phoney 'war upon terrorism'. Its sickening to actually see the evidence that we've been lied to and are still being lied to. Those who cannot see this from this documentary, good luck to you. You are so engrossed in the system and the illusions that the govenment continually dish out that you deserve sympathy. Just think of this; consider the dangers that those who put this documentary could be in and have been risking by making it. This is accusing the government, the fat-cats and the organisations such as the FBI in a very big and dangerous way. They're exposing a most ugly conspiracy that is endangering. I'm just amazed that this documentary is obtainable.\n\nGood luck everyone.
564767
Haven't seen it...you can, however, check the external reviews section of IMDB's page on the film...\n\nhttp://www.imdb.com/title/tt0052918/externalreviews\n\nThese are usually pretty helpful for film discussions.