the nazi military drive toward the russian caucasus and the middle east demonstrated?
371173
B) and D) and my factual reasoning:\n\nHitler had argued in Mein Kampf of the necessity of acquiring new territory for German settlement (Lebensraum) in Eastern Europe. \n\nTo hardline Nazis in Berlin, the war against the Soviet Union was one of a struggle of Fascism against Communism, and the Aryan race against the "inferior" Slavic race.
60215
It gets alot from Russia and the Caucasus.
645327
"Russia, one of the Allied powers during the war, had problems with its supply routes over sea. The Baltic Sea was locked by the German Navy, while the Black Sea's only entrance was through the Bosporus, which was controlled by the Ottoman Empire."\n\n"By late 1914, the Western Front, in France and Belgium, had effectively become fixed. A new front was desperately needed."\n\n"After the failure of the naval attacks, it had become clear that ground troops were necessary to eliminate the Turkish mobile artillery."\n\nThe Australian and New Zealand Army Corps, "The Anzacs were to land north of Gaba Tepe on the Aegean coast from where they could advance across the peninsula and prevent retreat from or reinforcement of Kilitbahir."
378669
It was something to do with Germany, in WW2.  I believe it was the official name for the law that made the Jews leave German territories.
234249
Hitler wanted to start a war by claiming the Sudetland (West Chezkoslovakia) where "true german arians lived" before WWI. Much to his surprise the British and French agreed to his demands in hopes of "appeasing him". But that only made him think they were cowards and accelerated his invasion of Poland.
290464
Ok.....a full answer to this would take 200 pages minimum.  This is the stuff graduate thesis are made of....but to summarize.........\n\nYou have to change how you view what WW2 was.  It was essentially a late and last ditch effort for a newly resurgant Russian and German empire to expand territory.  Both countries have always had flexible borders (borders that often change) over their histories.  And Russia in particiular has always sought expansion for warm water ports.  If you look at the geography of it......Germany and Russia are natural rivals.  This is why Russia so distrusted any form of a unified Germany following ww2....Russia has always seen invasions from German territory...even before there was a Germany.  In the early-mid-late 30's both countries were already expanding.....but the Germans were bogged down with Yugoslavia and Poland, and the Russian expansion was bogged down in Finland.  Both leaders also distrusted their militaries....and had to consolidate domestic power at various times.  The alliance/non-agression pact was always meant to be a temporary measure.  Hitler rose to power screaming about communism and socialism.  He was always a direct rival of Stalin.  Stalin and the communist party in Russia saw Hitler as an enemy of the proletariat...and historically feared Germany.  In other words both Stalin and Hitler knew that they were going to be fighting at some point.  The non-agression pact was a mutual agreement to take care of other concerns before this happened.  Germany over came it's problems/obstacles before the Soviets did (they had a 70 year advantage on industrialization, and a more centralized/homogenous population) and broke the Warsaw Pact first.  Stalin's reaction was simple disbelief....and when he did find out the invasion was real he hid for days inside of a bunker and Russia was in chaos.  He finally emerged...and ww2 was fought on the the plains of Russia.  To say that ww2 was a land war between Germany and The Soviet Union would not be too far off the mark.  Both sides benefited from the non-agression pact....but Germany was quicker to take advantage.  As far as appeasement.....the initial German expansion was more bluff than anything else.  THe german war machine could quickly have been stopped in places like Czeck.  To understand appeasement you have to understand the Versailles treaty (the treaty/surrender that ended ww1).  The German State lost territory, had to make reparations, etc.  They had limited military production.  The French (who suffered the worst of ww1) were the primary driving force behind the humiliating (to German thinking) Treaty of Versailles.  The English always felt the sanctions on Germany were unfair and unenforcable.  Because of this....when the Germans entered areas like the Sudatland......the British saw it as fair.  The french lacked the strength or will to fight...especially without international support.  By the time that Germany entered Poland (a mutual invasion with Russia actually), their war machine and industry was far greater...and Hitler's domestic power was far more consolidated.  The Germans already had a huge buffer zone.  Appeasement lead to the inevitable and eventual war with a stronger Germany.
950530
No.  The Germans weren't responsible for it in the first place.  The Nazis were.  Big difference.
782900
No countries have done such things, groups within countries have done though.  For example, Islamic fundimentalists have waged war on western civilisation (not just Christianity I might add) but that doesn't mean all of the Middle East suddenly becomes an enemy.  Much in the same way, the Nazis were German but that doesn't mean all of Germany was an enemy during WW2, just the state that took presidence.
151772
The act that started WWII was Hitler's invasion of Poland in 1938, you can look there. But of course it could be argued that WWII started before that as Naziism took hold of the German country.
99729
I'm having a hard time finding those specific details online.\n\nHere is a book specifically focuses on the British/Soviet Invasion of Iran\nhttp://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0275927938\n\nBasic Information that I've found so far,\nhttp://www.iranian.com/History/Nov97/WWII/index.html\nhttp://www.parstimes.com/history/anglo_soviet_invasion.html\n\nfrom http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Soviet_invasion_of_Persia\n"The Soviets came from the north with their 44th, 47th and 53rd Armies."\n\nfrom http://www.onwar.com/chrono/1941/aug41/25aug41.htm\n"The Soviet forces advance in three columns under General Novikov's command. One column moves on Tabriz while the other two advance on either side of the Caspian Sea."\n\nLots of detailed information on WWII Soviet military actions and compositions\nhttp://rkkaww2.armchairgeneral.com/index.htm
707240
yes you better beleive it.some body said above russia will be the next 3rd reiche,untrue our governments are all run by the global elite ,world banks and such most of the figure heads in so called civilised countrys are compramised this goes back a century but the point is the 4th reiche is on its way and all the countrys involved in thse world banks are part of it.in the next 5-10 years we will be living in a world wide version of nazi germany t,the people will be drafted and used as cannon foder to invade contrys that are not under control of the NEW WORLD ORDER like .....................the middle east ,there are and have been millitary bases all over iraq ,this will be the base in which to invade the middle east .this is kind of a generaliseation and off target to your question ,but all this is in plain view .history is repeating itself.
293533
Russia stretches all the way from Europe to Asia. The "middle east" is not stricty defined in Geography but basically means those countries stuck in the middle between asia, europe and africa; maybe that's why they are always fighting!
455717
What,there were 60 million people killed in that war why don`t you interview one of the Russian survivors of the death camps.20million Russians were killed in that war.All you here about is the jews! It is offensive!
452346
Nazi Germany and the third reich. Hitler
650174
the Caucasus and Ural mountains
323881
Unilateral acts committed by Armenia? The invasion of Azerbaijan: the Nagorno-Karabakh war of 1991.
635194
Ogr (about Hitler Youth boys fought in Berlin), Stalingrad (German perspective on Stalingrad Battle), Enemy at the Gates (Hollywood version of old Soviet story), Marshal Zhukov (a Russian movie on legendary Marshal of Red Army).\nThey are many to count.