One of those stupid logic problems...?
364822
Yes.\n\nAll jeeters are jopsters but are all jopsters jeeters? All weemits are wonkers but not all wonkers are jeeters, so it's possible to be a weemit but not a jeeter. \n\nSo I say yes.
469247
A = A\n\nThis is one.
1036394
Well, Miss Princess, it looks like you are not that intelligent after all.\n#1 That is not a sentence.\n#2 "why" should be "Why"\n#3 "r" should be "are"\n#4 "dum" should be "dumb"\n#5 "cause" should be "because" ("Cause" and "because" are two different words.)\nAnd, to answer your question, if it can be called that, I am actually a genius (according to the IQ test I was given as a child, anyway).
93641
Okay, 2 + 4= Look at 2 now look at 4, 4 is 4 pieces and 2 is 2 pieces. add the 4th piece and the second piece = 6! Duh!
800191
You seem to have either a very poor grasp of logic or you severely lack the ability to ask a clear question ...\n\nThis doesn't compute, Al.\n\n(((( r u randy? ))))\n.
222284
duh...?  what's your question, Mam?  \n\n=0(
910403
If John had a 1 then Sheila's number would need to be 2\n\nIf John had a 5 then Sheila's number would need to be 4\n\nSo when John says "I don't know your number", he has just effectively told Sheila he does not have 1 or 5\n\nThe same logic dictates Sheila cannot have 1 or 5 and also lets you say:-\n\nIf Shiela had a 2, she would know John had a 3 (Since she knows he does not have a 1)\n\nIf Shiela had a 4, she would know John had a 3 (Since she knows he does not have a 5)\n\nSo when Sheila says "I don't know your number" she is effectively saying, "I don't have 2 or 4"\n\nSo Sheila's number must be 3
537244
...and the question is?
934914
yup 2+2=4, and some people are stupid!
1018246
HAHAHA You are just stupid!! Problem solved!!!\n\nSpammer\n\nthanks for the points!!\n\nagain
166615
maby a stupid question ??
364344
emmmmmm\n\nd. its not a fuction of x in terms of y explicitly. It needs to be rearranged
862865
Huh?\n\nThis makes no sense.
759105
False... y has to be 2...\n(3,2) is a solution, but not (3,1).
1160912
and the question is...?
191250
Mathematicians have proven that, in general, 1 + 1 = 2. It took them awhile to do it, but they succeeded. Unless the time truly comes when there is a need to ignore this generalisation, this assumption made is as good as any other axioms ever declared by the wise logicians.
968857
just work backwards to find out the logic in it. That way you'll get why it works that way it did