How is properly to say for nylon sock's?
374915
If they are separate and come above the knee (thigh-high) - one on left leg, one on right - Stockings\nIf they only come up to just below the knee - knee-highs\nIf they only come up to the ankle - socks\nIf they are joined at the top and include panties - tights (in UK) or pantyhose (in US)
390842
wears nylons. That always does it for me. Also, guys love it when you show real enthusiasm towards them. Not fake enthusiasm. But real interest and be able to open up.
484504
Depends on which of the following meanings you require.\n\n(i) firmly:\nfirmly\nstrongly\nforcefully\nclosely\nsecurely\n\n(ii) closely:\nclosely\ncompactly\nsnugly\ncosily\n\n(iii) strictly:\nstrictly\nstringently\nharshly\nfirmly\nseverely\nsternly\nrigidly\n\nYep, hope this will help. =D
104050
Stationery, sleigh, seam, so (or sew), pair (or pare)
171101
What?  I don't understand the question.\n\nDo you mean you want the Spanish word for "rules"?  I would usually use "reglas" (it's feminine, plural).
107399
Formal:\n\nQuiere jugar basquetbol el viernes?\nQuiere usted jugar basquetbol el viernes?\nQuiere jugar baloncesto el viernes?\nQuiere usted jugar baloncesto el viernes?\n\nNOT formal:\n\nQuieres jugar basquetbol el viernes?\nQuieres jugar baloncesto el viernes?\n\nDepends on where you are and what you want to say.. they are all correct though. I am a fluent spanish AND english speaker :o)
815745
A tangerine in a sock usually.
900174
How about:\n"I need a sentence with notwithstanding in it?"
143068
underwear... lol.. no both socks first then shoes.. usually because my shoes are on the other side of the room when I put my socks on.
555814
like 'tay-al'  or  'tie-al'
305216
Thighs...\nSpread the word!
653653
The plural of dress is dresses.  If a singular noun ends in '-s', you (usually) make it plural by adding '-es'.
33558
Pair, pare, pear. LOL....language is a mystery.\n\nPeople want to know why we don't say "a pair of bras." Also, it's strange that the phrase pair of pants is the only way to refer to one such item, since the word pants is always plural. This explains why the singular pant is sometimes used, especially by the clothing and fashion industry. Though jarring to some people, singular pant has been in use since the late 19th century. \n\nPants is an Americanism first recorded in 1840, and was considered a vulgar term for at least a century afterwards. It is a shortened form of pantaloons, from Pantalone, a stock character in Italian commedia dell'arte, who wore a combination of loose breeches and stockings. The term pantaloons is first recorded in English about 1600, and was applied at different periods to leg garments of different styles. \n\nSo why do we say "pair of pants/shorts/trousers/slacks?" Until the late 17th century, leg garments were made in two parts, one sleeve of fabric for each leg, so calling them a "pair" made perfect sense. The two pieces of woven cloth (or animal hides) were tied to a belt to hold them up. Supposedly the resulting indecent exposure made the "codpiece" a useful invention. From the Columbia Encyclopedia I learned the history of pants: After the Middle Ages, a loose trouser, bound at the ankle, was worn. Then the lower legs became more fitted, and these "breeches" were shortened to the knee and worn with fitted cloths called "hose." Breeches grew shorter and hose became longer; by about 1450 the hose reached the hips and were attached by points (laces) to the doublet. Later the breeches and hose formed one garment, like tights. As the upper part of the hose became more puffed out, a separation occurred: the upper part was called "trunk hose," and the leg coverings were called "stockings." Trousers grew longer and stockings shorter. In the early 17th century, men wore pantaloon breeches, but a tight-fitting trouser was introduced in the late 18th century, eventually superseding knee breeches, or knickers. The so called "trunk hose" evolved into what we now call "pants," and the so called "stockings" are what we now also call "hose."
197261
Wool\nCotton\nSilk\nHemp\nFlax\nSisal\nJute \nCoir\nKapok
275971
"Dis" is a prefix for comfort - discomfort.\n\nIf you use the word "comfortable" you could have "uncomfortable", so then "un" would be a prefix.\n\nI guess if you use comfort as a verb, as in "to comfort" then you could use "re" as in "recomfort".\nI hope this helps.
1054321
♡Well, I live in Japan and I think the regular phrase would be "suteki na" 素敵 【すてき】 (adj-na,n) lovely; dreamy; beautiful; great; fantastic; superb; *cool; capital. ～But I always hear the "younger" Japanese girls (and guys) use the word "kakkoii!"  (sounds like "kah-koo-ee"). I'm not sure about the spelling, but I know it means something along the lines of "cool, wonderful, great..."! (☆Found it with my hubby's help!)↓\nhttp://rut.org/cgi-bin/j-e/dosearch?sDict=on&H=PS&L=J&T=kakkoii&WC=none&FG=w&BG=b&S=26\n That could be used. They use it for good looking guys, fashionable clothes, wonderful accessories... I'm sure someone will give you the correct spelling or another option! Hope this helps!♡\n♡Kara, I suggest you go to this site and check the Japanese words for yourself too.(*^o^*) You can learn lots of new words and choose the ones you like best!\nhttp://rut.org/cgi-bin/j-e/dict\nIt's easy, enter the Japanese word, for example kakkoii, Ikemen, bishounen and press "go". Your answers will appear soon. It's a useful site!
937264
There are someting called "Ashinaka" which translated would mean "the middle of the foot."  These were typically made of straw and would only cover the middle portion of the sole with the heels and toes protruding from the front and back.  They were worn to give better traction and gripping power.\n\nBTW...the link works if you take away the last three dots.