the angle of what is connected to the angle of what because both angles are exactly the same?
358118
In an equilateral traingle, all sides are equal and all three angles are 60 degrees.\n\nIn an isosceles triangle, two sides are equal and the two base angles of an isosceles triangle are equal to one another.\n\nThe other answer above refers to light reflected in a mirror or other reflecting surface/
952437
b. SAS\n\nSide-Angle-Side... two triangles with congruent angles with SAS relationship are equal triangles.
1139471
Yeah where's angle 1 and 2.\nBut remember the angle opposite the longest side has the greastest measurement.
86738
The angles all add up to 180 degrees.\n\nIf you know the lengths of all the sides you can use the "Law of Tangents" to find all the angles.  This is advanced geometry and Trigonometry, so rather than type, I am including a link to a pretty good explanation.\n\nhttp://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=38131
33049
Start with a square. All sides being equal and all internal angles being equal (90 degrees), there are four equal sides, each of which contain only two points --> hence, for N = 4, here are four couples of points which do not contain the other two non-coupled points. If they did contain the other point(s), it would not be a square and thus N would not equal 4. Which isn't true.
830426
The crux of this problem is for you to realize that the given angles are "complementary pairs", which add up to 90 degrees.\n\nYou are expected to know that the "co-function" of angle A gives the same value as the "function" of angle A's complement.\n\nSpecifically:\n\n cos(A) = sin(90-A)\n\nA graphical way of looking at this statement is that "cosine and sine are the same function, but offset by 90 degrees!"  We call that "out of phase by pi/2 or 90 degrees."\n\nThe same works for tangent and its co-function:\n\n tan(A) = cot(90-A)\n\nSo the answer to the second problem is 0.\n\nIf one of the fuctions in the first problem had been sin, the quotient would have been 1.  However, that's not the case, and I leave the upper problem as an exercise for another Answerer.\n\n Hope this helps!
799966
the external angle\n\ni hope that this helps
1112368
Angles associated with a Pyramid\n\ncheck out the site for the mathematical equation\n\n\n\n\n\n            In mathematics, the term pyramid refers to a rather general type of geometric solid.  One can find the definition here.  But the pyramids that one finds in different parts of the world generally have a rectangular base with the apex directly above the center of the base.  Most of the pyramids in Egypt actually have a square base and are therefore quite symmetrical. The four faces are isosceles triangles and are congruent to each other.  The shape of such a pyramid is determined by the angle that each face makes with the base, i.e. the angle formed by the horizontal line joining the midpoint of the base of a face to the center of the pyramid and the slanted line joining that midpoint to the apex of the pyramid.    That angle could be any angle between 0o and 90o. If that angle is close to 90o, then the pyramid would be very tall and would seem like a simple, pointed obelisk.  If that angle is close to 0o, then the pyramid would be almost flat and one would  probably be unhappy calling it a pyramid.  But the shape is also determined by various other quantities.  For example, the angle that each edge of the pyramid makes with the base would be sufficient.  (That angle is formed by the horizontal line joining a corner of the pyramid to the center and the edge joining that corner to the apex.)   Either of these angles is determined by its slope, or the inverse of its slope.  In modern Western Mathematics,  it would be customary to specify either angle by its slope, but the discussions of pyramids that one finds in the Egyptian Mathematical Papyri suggest that the Egyptian architect would have specified an angle by the inverse of its slope. For the slant-angle of the faces of a pyramid, the inverse-slope is referred to as the "seked" of the pyramid in the Rhind papyrus. \n\nhttp://www.math.washington.edu/~greenber/slope.html
358372
its square with all sides and angles equal
279825
I'll assume that you're looking for a solution to the system of equations, or an ordered pair which solves both equations at the same time.  Solving both equations for y tells you that y=(x-5)/2.  In other words, it is the exact same line.  When we have the same line in a system of equations, it is known as coincident lines, which means that there is an infinite number of solutions to the system of equations.
806325
360 degrees because only zero degree or 360 degrees places the angle in the same quadrant. if u are asking multiples of then the answer would be a finite number i.e. 360 degrees.\n\nexplaination:\ntake a circle and hold its radius at the circumference, now move it round the circle with its center point fixed. it will come at the same place only after 360 degrees, or it will substend the same angle as it was when u started the movement.
262981
All sides and angles are equal to a side and angle on another figure
726903
since the sum of two  angles is equal to the one angle it  imlies the third angle is 90 degree since \nbecause:\nLet the angles be a,b,c now a+b=c therefore a+b+c=180 now a+b=c therefore 2c=180 this implies c=90 degrees. therefore it is a right triangle hence the measure of the third side according to pythagoras therom is square root of the sum of the squares of both sides
657516
No difference, there are one and the same but from different angles
535452
simple  for smooth surfaces, the angle of incidence is equal to the angle of reflection\nso the angle of reflection is going to be the same angle mentioned in the question
1106173
The direction (angle) of |u| and |v|?
642048
Think about it.  If you have an angle drawn on a sheet of paper and you rotate one segment, will the length of the segment still be the same?  Yes, all you're doing is changing its position, the length remains the same.  \nWill the measure of the angle remain the same?  Of course not, by rotating one segment you're automatically changing the angle from it to the other segment.  \nFinally, if you rotate a segment, is it still oriented the same?  No way!  You just changed its position, how can it still be oriented the same way?