Is it "couldn't care less" or "could care less?"?
359823
The expression was originally "I couldn't care less."  It means "I care so little (i.e. not at all) that there is no way for me to care less."\n\nPeople started using "I could care less" by mistake, but eventually that became popular so now people say both.\n\nThere are lots of things in our language like that, where the "wrong" version eventually gets accepted.
168367
It certainly can be. Although "however" is most often used as an adverb, it can be used as a conjunction, as it is in this sentence from the American Heritage Dictionary:\n\nDress however you like.
760434
impossible\n\nbut u can reduce it
608286
Neither...\nThe word THIS is a pronoun or an adjective.\nThis is a good QUESTION!
681529
"were" is the correct usage. It's subjunctive usage, meaning that it is imagined or wished or possible, rather than reality.
351713
In American English it is CANNOT, but I think that in British English you can use "can not."
1099878
"that's the least i could do".  this never made sense to me.  it always made it sound like they were a cheapskate, or didn't bother to put any effort into it.
302394
I use both in different situations. If I were to say I was going on a vacation to the Caribbean, I would say Cu-rib-e-un but if I were to talk about the Disney movie and ride "Pirates of the Caribbean" I say Care-uh-be-un. I don't know why exactly, Care-uh-be-un fits better with pirates I suppose.
879841
It doesn't bother me in the least. I couldn't care less.
689858
Yeah, I'm surprised.\n\nBut I could really care less...
65645
im·portant·ly adv. \nUsage Note: Some critics have objected to the use of the phrase more importantly in place of more important when one introduces an assertion, as in More importantly, no one is ready to step into the vacuum left by the retiring senator. But both forms are widely used by reputable writers, and there is no obvious reason for preferring one or the other.\n\n-----------\nir·re·gard·less    ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (r-gärdls)\nadv. Nonstandard \nRegardless.\n[Probably blend of irrespective, and regardless.] \nUsage Note: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.
244095
none except\nmajors are longer, minors are shorter\nall GOD'S WORD is very important-vs by vs-chapter by chapter, choosing subject and object.  know more. contact me.
1138933
the closest you can get to an opposite for "not" is nothing.  literally, i mean like "   " because adding "not" makes whatever it goes with the opposite.  so the opposite of "not" is just to not have the "not"  :)
657007
The same as : Isn't it half good".\n\nMeans you're more or less ok as a person.
853867
It's in its lowest terms.\nIt can't be simplified.
782933
A little means there is a small amount of something. But little means almost none. Hence, a little is more positive. Consider the examples;\n\nI have a little homework. (I have some homework, a small amount)\nI have little homework. (The amount is so small, almost none)\n\nApply the same thing to a few and few. \n\nFew students wanted to volunteer...(sounds unsatisfied with the number)\nA few students wanted to volunteer... (like "Some students wanted to volunteer")\n\nNow, the difference is clear. A few sounds more positive whereas few implies some kind of a criticism.\n\nAs for enquiry and inquiry, I'd say enquiry is the British form and the inquiry is the American form.
989902
1. His pencil is superior to mine (use ".to" rather than "than"}  2. Neither of them was praised. (neither means one so you have to use singular - was.  3. She is more clever than anyone in her class.( no such word as cleverer)  4. The rich should not hate the poor.    5.This cloth is superior to that ( use "to" rather than "than".)   On number 4, you might have accidently typed that capital S - but it shouldn't be there.