Which Beatle will die first: Paul or Ringo?
368186
Both are close to the same age, both exhibit a similar life style and have lived a similar life style.  I don't know their eating and exercise habits so it would just be a guess.  Darn I would hate to guess some ones time of death.  I just hope they both live a long time.  Sorry I weinered out on that one!
745126
Paul Walker\nJessica Alba
832329
Beatles - let it be\nb
267721
Lennon without a doubt.  I think Paul isn't quite as bad as people make him to be, but John and George were much better.  John especially took the music to a whole different level.
90584
A lot of internal difficulties.  John Lennon was preoccupied with Yoko Ono, George Harrison did not get along with Paul McCartney's overbearing nit-picking, and their musical interests were heading in different directions.  George was interested in eastern music, John wanted to address social issues, and Paul felt that people hadn't had enough of silly love songs.  Hence the split.
540135
•Peter Eckhorn offered Ringo £30 a week to go back to Germany and play with Tony Sheridan and an apartment. Ringo eventually joins Rory Storm. John called him at Butlin's to offer £25 a week as a Beatle.\n\n•Ringo had 400,000 shares of Northern Songs, Ltd. in 1969 worth £80,000.\n\n•When ATV bought a majority stake in Northern Songs in 1969, Ringo got shot of his holding for £80,000 but otherwise he didn't have much more money than sense because "if I think I'm being conned I do without". He also said at this time that he had "more money than I'd ever dreamed of" (Clayson and Sunday Post '69).\n\n•Ringo sold Brookfields (property) for £100,000 to Stephen Stills\n\nthats the best i can find. sorry
882965
If starr falls off the pearch before sir paul, then mabye you have something, but even then ill be hard to convince it was anything other than a coincidence.\n\nyouve got a keen eye though.
200503
Here's ONE!  st. paul, born------died.  ;o)
419527
BEATLES , BUT CANT REMEMBER ITS NAME
753413
I would say Elvis or John Lennon
606128
Well sorry but technically  Ringo or Phil can't match with such a guys like Steve Smith, Chobam, Blackwell, Cameron Clayton, Steve Gadd. Another thing is popularity- than there is other factors.
211068
Ringo Starr from The Beatles: His real name is Richard Starky...
1149152
Paul McCartney is 64, and Ringo Starr will turn 66 next Friday.
609030
I agree ringo IS 63-BUT STILL LOOKS GOOD TO ME
360454
Comparing Apples And Oranges    \n\n I Say The Beatles
670656
Probably The Beatles.
13478
The BEATLES  \n   If the Beatle didn't break the barrier, no one else would have.   The Stones are a great band and I love thier music but I think the beatles for the short time they were together were more prolific, and alway growing and changing.  Everyone copied what they were going through.   A good example of this is out there in a picture of Paul McCartney conducting an orchestra with Mick Jagger sitting at his feet and watching.