Which particles are certainly indivisible?
362076
Quarks - up, down, top, bottom, strange and charm.  Leptons - electron, electron neutrino, muon, muon neutrino, tau, and tau neutrino.  Force carriers - photon, gluon, W boson and Z boson.  This comprises the standard model of physics.
179228
Trying to change the laws of physics is harder than trying to eat just one potato chip, but it sounds as if you are asking about determinism, which is the belief that we do not in fact have free will and that our actions are not of our own choosing.\n\nOne way to look at it is that in our bodies, all the forces are balanced. This means that the force of gravity and the force of electromagnetism counterbalance each other. Neither one of them wholly dominate our minds or bodies. Sure, we are on the ground, but we can stand up, climb trees, walk up hills, etc., partially or temporarily defying gravity. \n\nThe strong nuclear interactive force and the weak nuclear interactive force are not the major thing in our lives, either. We are too big to be totally contollled by the nuclear interactive forces, and too small to be controlled entirely by gravity or electromagnetism. There is a YOU that is not determined (controlled) by those things. And YOU are able to pull the strings of your body, so that it obeys you, so that you consciously (not conscientiously) do things. \n\nOtherwise, there would be no such thing as good or evil. A vicious murderer, arsonist, terrorist, rapist, could say, "Your Honor, it's not my fault. I had no choice but to act that way, according to the laws of physics." If he could give convincing proof of this, the judge would have no choice but to let him off. \n\n(We can't have laws determined by voting, either, because man-made laws are just that-- man-made, finite, limited, and not necessarily fair. What if the bad guys got the majority of the vote? Would that make their laws right? No, of course not.)\n\nNo responsible judge would allow a criminal to escape justic based on an argument like this. The very existence of a justice system indicates that-- regardless of what we might say-- we believe in free will, we believe in the existence of right and wrong. Even the most materialistic person, when ill-treated, will protest the injustice. They may like to reason that we do not have free will (especially when it helps them get out from some responsibility) but when they are the one getting hurt, they suddenly remember that it isn't fair. \n\nWe can't have it both ways. If there is no free will, justice is an illusion and might makes right after all.\n\nSo, which one do you believe in?
273146
:}\nchance without cause is a logical impossibility
934638
Arbitrariness is one.
765400
You can not create or destroy matter. \nLaw of multiple proportions\nGas Laws\nEntropy, \nHeat laws, thermodynamics\nPeriodic Table rules\nlists of activities of elements\n\nI am sure that there are more
721826
"Arent all particles material?"\n\nNo.\n\nThere is a concept called wave-particle duality.\n\nHere is an example of a non-material particle, the phonon:\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon
14731
Photons, gluons, gravitons and Z are neutral and elementary so they are their own anti-particles.\n\nThe W+ and W-, the weak force carriers, are charged and are anti-particles.  W+ and W- can annihilate each other.
1091953
Analyzing the interactions between and examining the existence of, particles.
605414
According to one theory there are particles, which are exchanged and travel between the objects, giving impression that objects attract or repel each other. Nothing is proved yet and it is just a theory, as far as my knowledge is concerned.
68619
God\na universally all powerful self contradiction
239035
Independence....\n\nAnd what =0\n\nBig I
1113261
hypothetically\n\nan infinite number
335045
a) Changeable\nb) Determined by chance or impulse or whim rather than by necessity or reason
788162
All three Newton laws are real. They do support other two law, there is no conflict in them.
360394
A more generic term for the components of an atom is "sub-atomic particles."  I think that's the answer you're looking for.
641972
Photons.\n\nThere are about 10^9 photons for every nucleon in the universe.
878342
Nuclear force, gravitational force, (I think these can be either attractive or repulsive:) electrostatic force, and magnetic force.