Is an I.Q of 133 good for a 13 year old?
361791
Regardless of your age a 133 is very good--just short of genius.
1079966
Before you spend the money, check and see if your school checks them out.  Many schools do this, and then you can decide if you'll use it enough later in life to purchase it.  For instance, my high school checked out TI-82s to us, and then I ended up buying an 83 when I got to college.\n\nAlso, be aware the some teachers do not allow you to use your own calculators on tests due to the fear of cheating.  You might end up having to learn how to do it all on a basic calculator anyway, so that might affect how "worth it" it is to you.\n\nPersonally, I feel a TI-83 or so is plenty worth it.  My teachers always let us program whatever we wanted into our calculators anyway, because our tests were such that we had to show our understanding, and not just spit back facts and formulas.
255173
i am 13 years old. am interested in good fiction ,music, facts about the world, definately  not  philosophy,gardening etc. and ofcourse fooooooooooood
578728
You have to pass an IQ test before they allow you to use it. Anyone under 80 is OK, so I think you'll pass.
413790
The mere fact that you call it the "20s" and the "19s" and then follow it up with about 30 question marks proves you're about 14. Talk to me in another 14 years when you have some real experience and maybe I'll listen then
767997
1. Any halfway accurate IQ test you take would factor in your age when calculating the score, so a 13 year old who gets less questions right than a 25 year old might still get the same score.\n\n2. Most IQ tests you find on the internet are total crap, and furthermore, that Tickle IQ test gives you your score based on the performance of everyone who's taken the test, which includes people who cheated on it, which makes it ridiculously inaccurate.\n\n3. Many IQ tests are flawed in the questions they choose to use. For example, questions about proverbs and other cultural items do not test your intelligence so much as the depth of your knowledge of American English, and a brilliant person from another culture will miss that question. A famous example of a flawed question is, "Which of these does not belong with the others? A. dog B. deer C. cow E. horse." Someone might say "A. dog" because the dog does not have hooves. Someone else might say "deer" because the deer is the only animal that is not domesticated. Someone else might say "cow" because the cow is the only one that's a source of food. Someone else might say "horse" because the horse is the only one you can ride on.\n\n4. IQ tests often do not account for the variety in kinds of intelligence. There are many kinds of intelligence, some recognized by American culture and some not recognized by American culture but recognized by other cultures. For example, there is social intelligence, creative intelligence, logical intelligence, etc. IQ tests generally look at four intelligence types, but totally miss many others.\n\n5. The original purpose and professional use of IQ tests is not to tell normal people how smart they are. IQ tests were originally designed to detect mental deficiencies. For example, a child with a particular disorder might fail a large number of questions related to logic, or a child with another disorder may miss the questions relating to spacial skills.\nOnline tests will do a sort of reverse of this- telling you that your strong point is your spacial reasoning or something. It's not quite so bad as just spitting out a score, but it still is not what that kind of test is best used for.\n\n6. Once again, these things are as unreliable as all ****!\n\nSome geniuses might get a 260 on these tests. But, some geniuses might get a 95. There are many kinds of intelligence, and no IQ test- especially no free IQ test you find on the internet- can really tell you how smart you are. Your intelligence is something you have to discover by yourself, by coming up with the right way to go about things and getting the results you expect.
331594
I'd say Hardy Boys is nice. Much better though is "The Three investigator series", it is fantastic. If it the 13 yr old is a girl, Nancy Drew would be good. Any of Roald Dahl's books would be quite good for a 13 year old.\nSome books in order of my preference wud be:\n1.The Three Investigators (they have 13 or 14 books, u cud choose anyone, they r equally nice)\n2. The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar and Six More,\nOR\nThe Great Automatic Grammatizer(both by Roald Dahl\n3. Eragon by Christopher Paolini\n4. Goosebumps by R.L Stine(any of those 50 odd books)\n5. The Princess Diaries, by Meg Cabot(only if it is a Girl)\n6. Nancy Drew OR Hardy Boys Series\nMost of them are really good, i enjeoyed them when I was 13, I think so will u.U cud try out Harry Potter too, but I think u must already have, It is so popular\n\nWARNING:I do not suggest u to continue reading Enid Blyton. She uses the same kind of Characters, and almost the same plot n all her stories, gift her books to ur younger siblings. If u really must read her books, try reading the Famous Five series, The first 3-4 books are good but then she gets into much repition
492347
What chanel is 13?  That would help us with you're question.
461855
113 is in the normal range.  Not top of the list, but not on the "special" bus, either.\n\nWorry not but keep studying!
772125
No I am in level 4 and I am 13. Go for it.
1156365
It's normal.  Just talk to her, and be there to answer any questions.  If she's a good smart kid, you shouldn't have any thing to worry about.  What's important is that she can make good decisions.
819654
I am 9 but mine scored in at 146, so I would say yours is quite low.
484285
You could consult the college catelogue. They can tell you what they require and what they don't. \n\nYour best source of correct information is to go straight to the source rather than asking a bunch of 13 year olds who are bored in study hall.
256724
10 12 14 18\n\nbecause you are just 13
195991
Any quotient is a ratio, and by definition an average I.Q. will be 100.\nThe ratio, I.Q. = (mental age / chronological age)100.\n\nHave a look here:
789598
Hi there.\n\nI would say that it is definately suitable for a thirteen year old, I havent read ti myself but I have read the reviews and an interview she did regarding it and she said that she specifically wrote it for young girls, to insire them and there is nothing unsiutable in there. Also the reviews have said that it is not ''very reaveling'' which basically meant it didnt have the smutty stuff like other celebs such as jodie marsh and jordan.\n\nI think it would be great for a presant for a 13 yr old. My sister is 13 and I'm getting it for her for xmas.\n\nHope that helps
575365
13 but not overnight.