Why isn't there an ultimate plitical party?
372922
there isn't because all the party is just think for themselves coz its a rich business and they are just for themself not for anyone else. All political party are corrupted.
800831
It isn't realistic. There will always be right wingers and left wingers. However a new middle party is a good idea.
888209
They could, but they represent very different philosophies. It won't happen. The only thing they have in common is that very few people vote for any of their candidates.
875321
There are hundreds of political parties out there offering all sorts of views.\n\nSo go join one, and promote it! Then again, there's plenty of room for more parties. You can anme it after yourself.
1023839
Couldn't the same be said about all political parties?
1063013
Two party systems are inherently more stable than those with more parties, because the way to get more votes is always to be more centrist.  The votes that are being fought over are those who agree with some of what one party says and some of the other.  \nMultiple party systems are more unstable, because the way to get votes is not to appeal to a majority but rather to appeal to a motivated minority.  If there were 10 parties, a party could win with only 15% of the vote--even if the other 85% totally disagree with that parties platform.  This leads to success for racist and nationalist parties, as well as other extreme parties that cater to only one interest.
565321
Because the United States is a generally stable country in which the preferred pace of change is gradual and in which radicalism has never found favor for very long.\n\nNew ideas are implemented slowly and tend to be appropriated by one or both of the major parties which gradually change their political postures. \n\nFor the most part, both parties are "big tents" which tolerate a wide variety of opinions amongst their members and have no fixed ideological perspective. \n\nFor most of its history, for example, the Republicans were the more progressive of the two parties and the first attempts to legislate racial justice and women's rights were Republican initiatives. As late as 1964 the landmark civil rights Act of that year received proportionately more Republican than Democrat votes. Obviously things have changed but are just as likely to swing back in the other direction as not.\n\nSince each of the parties stands for whatever its membership at any moment wants it to, voters are not as motivated to leave and form a new party. Rather they either switch parties or work to change the policies of the party they belong to.\n\nFurthermore, the American system of government with its "winner take all" type elections makes it difficult for a new party to gain traction. Every institution of government has developed procedures to accommodate two parties and a new party finds itself without any role other than gadfly or spoiler.
1046
Somebody good like McCain should run as an Independent!  The partisan politics of the Democrats and Republicans seems to cause a lot of nothing getting done for the sake of toeing the party line.  I feel we need someone who can breach the impasse(s) that these parties seem to have caused over the years by uniting individuals from the "ruling" parties to take an active part in government.  The current system needs some kind of "spanking" and only an independent can do it; I feel McCain is the man.
679047
.... okay, from what I can make of this, here's my answer.\n\nThere is NO ruling party. There is a party that has Executive power, but overall, it's even.\n\nThere will ALWAYS be dissent among the population. Never will everyone agree. \n\nAnd, no. You can't take action against a party just because you don't like them. Everyone has a turn.
992612
Hm,\n\nEver heard of \nIndependant\nReform Party\nAmerica First Party\nConstitution Party\nFamily Values Party\nThe Green Party\n\nThere are many - proplem is people are happy with the crap they have. Or, just too lazy to do anything else.\n\nThere are MANY more. Do a google search and find one that fits your beliefs. Then, promote it.
218663
Nobody currently in Washington. There are people "on both sides of the aisle" who would agree with you on some of these issues, but not all. Think 3rd party. Try my link...
215712
Because it is a proportional representation system, no party is likely to have a majority. Significant parties are likely to include:\n\n* Party of Regions likely to be the largest bloc:\n\n* Our Ukraine; and the\n\n* Yuliya Tymoshenko.\n\nOther major players are likely to be the Socialist and Communist parties.
786072
Only extreme partisans completely support the agenda of one side or the other. The vast majority of the country are moderate. They may lean to one side or the other, but are still willing to cross lines in the name of good legislation.
840220
Because they want to live simple. Too many political parties can weaken the current governments and create the political mayhem and disasters.
953101
I think it it would force the parties to understand they have to start working together.\nCurrently both parties are focused on what is best for the party, NOT what is best for the people, a third party would force an end to this abomination.
92256
In the United States, most people believe in the "marketplace of ideas". That is, that the more arguments and opinions we talk about the more likely we are to find the right answer.\n\nThe problem with only having one party is that you are less likely to get a diversity of opinions. Consequently, you're less likely to find the best solution to a given problem.\n\nOf course, it's possible to have a marketplace of ideas within one party...but the whole point of a "party" is to organize a bunch of people who beleive the whole thing.
420330
The problem is the powerful 2 party system. Democrats and Republicans muscle out "independents" and leave us with a choice between 2 entire sets of beliefs.  We're forced to pick a party that fits us even if we disagree with much of the platform.  If we could level the playing field and encourage competition, the power would shift from the major parties to the people.