there was a Judge that stated "It's like porn you know it when you see it". I need the Judge's name please.
355965
Justice Potter Stewart, Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 197 (1964)\n\n"I have reached the conclusion . . . that under the First and Fourteenth Amendments criminal laws in this area [obscenity] are constitutionally limited to hard-core pornography. I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know if when I see it; and the motion picture involved in this case is not that."
929839
Here's a direct quote from the Dr. Phil website.  Also below is a link from same for controlling jealousy.  "Pornography isn't real, it's a fantasy. It's makeup, beauty lenses, hair extensions, camera angles, lighting and silicone! It's also somebody's daughter who has taken a really, really wrong turn. She's demeaning herself, debasing herself, humiliating herself and she's being exploited by people who are funded by you. It is a sick, demented, twisted world. It's not healthy, it's not natural and it's not normal."  This is why you feel this way.
1050327
I actually had the show on today, but failed to get any details....or have since forgotten.  Try judgejoebrowndotcom  or fox.com (or whatever network it was on) and look for links like About This Show, or Ask our Staff, or similar.\n\nGood luck!
1017041
Yep........Judge Judy
638232
It's a judge;of course he/she can.
1020647
The clips from WoW put together to an old tune with new words saying "The Internet is for Porn". ;)  You'll have to watch it at least half a dozen times before it doesn't make you laugh anymore.
720363
His name is Daniel Powter and you can check the video at this website. \n\nEnjoy
17704
Ugh..........you can't. Man, there is so much porn out there......must you pay? Must you really ask this question anyway??? \n\nThe guy above is right.......lol
850932
you don't. that is done by the admin. of youtube. if you're lookin for porn, try haporn.com
62584
Some good answers here.  I'll take a stab at it myself, though I don't know anything about the incidents other than what the original poster included in his question.\n\nFirst, we're talking about illegal pornography.  "Regular" porn, the kind that isn't illegal depending on whoever's standards we're using, isn't going to be subject to a search warrant because it isn't a crime...and search warrants can only be issued when they seek to provide evidence of a public offense (a crime).  So whatever porn we're talking about, it's evidently illegal according to whatever legal standard is being used (and this varies, but things like kiddy porn are illegal everywhere in the US).  Once the illegality has been established, then I don't think there's much left to talk about...you cannot hide behind a right to privacy if you are engaging in criminal behavior.  That's not to say you give up your right to privacy, it's to say that if you're engaging in criminal acts, the government has the right to ask a judge for a search warrant to gather evidence of those acts, and I would argue that you cannot complain about your privacy being "invaded" when they do.\n\nAnd a word about search warrants; they are not rubber-stamped documents that sail through the justice system to your front door.  Law enforcement agents must prepare an application for them, outlining reasons to believe a particular place holds evidence of a particular crime.  They must swear the things they've said in that document are true, and then they must present the document to a neutral party - a magistrate (or a judge).  That magistrate (or judge) then reviews the information provided by the agent, and decides on his/her own if there is a more than likely chance (i.e., "probable cause") that the things the agents are looking for are in the places the agents say they are.  Despite the rare news to the contrary, magistrates and law enforcement alike take this process seriously.\n\nAbout the "third party" argument made by the original poster: again - if you're engaging in criminal behavior, you cannot expect to hide behind the right to privacy just because you've given the evidence of your guilt to a third party.  The government has the right under our system of law to gather evidence of your criminal behavior, no matter where you have left it.\n\nIf you want to deliver evidence of your involvement in criminal acts to a third party, press on...and you do so at your own risk, obviously.  The original poster's comment is well taken; if your third party is going to comply with an order of a court to disclose certain information relative to criminal acts, then perhaps you need to find another third party - one who will become a criminal themselves if they fail to comply with a lawful court order.\n\nYahoo and Google have not betrayed anyone's trust...although it's been a while since I've seen them, I'm fairly certain both corporations have privacy policies, and I'm equally certain both of them talk about safeguarding your information except when ordered to release it pursuant to a court order.  If the third party thing bothers you, don't use a third party...there's a saying: "three can keep a secret, if two are dead."  \n\nDon't want anybody to know what you're doing?  Don't tell anybody.
532105
I concur with your conclusions.  I had sex before I was of age. some of that sex was with a man who was of age.  I pushed myself on him. It was MY decision.  No one has the right to take that away from me, no matter what the law says now.  I am disgusted that the legal system thinks it should be able to double guess me or anyone else.\n\nRegards,\n\nReynolds Jones\nSchenectady, NY\n\nPS  The gentleman has now communicated with me.  He was 17 at the time of the encounter -- which is legal in nearly all states (Age of Consent averages 16, NY is 17, a couple of states actually are 18) this means the sex was legal, but the porn may not have been.\n\nRJ
56252
Probley staged. you porn freak
760084
The impersonator is going to end up in jail..this person has gone too far!!\nI've already contacted a lawyer!
711992
Good News!!!!\nDo check this URL.\nYou will get what you want.\nP.S: Please do not click Porn images, and minimize pop-up windows. \nGood Luck,
49127
only if the judge allows it in
1092058
go see a judge he show u one
650321
The courts decide with a real judge. Everything else is fantasy and fiction.