If Lord Jesus Christ had sex with his brother James, would he then be known as Gaylord Jesus Christ?
371551
bye bye..you like having your questions removed don't you!
1092206
Nope,  to a Jewish person, Jesus Christ is just a historical figure.  It would be like an American stubbing his toe and exclaiming, "James K. Polk!"
580625
Well, that would make him more human than divine (or, at least, in some people's minds, detract from his divinity).  For pretty much the same reason, the Catholic Church upholds the idea that Mary, the mother of Jesus, was a perpetual virgin.  (They state that she and Joseph never consummated their marriage.  To have had siblings would have made Jesus too human.  People would have pointed to the mortality of the siblings as arguement that Jesus was merely a human philosopher.)\nAlso, a belief system that would have allowed for such an idea as the marriage of Jesus and Mary Magdalene would have set up a complicated sytem of privilege.  Claimants of descent from Jesus would have caused huge political consequences, if such claims didn't otherwise doom the religion early on.\nIn short, such a belief would have complicated the religion.
357023
If Jesus claimed this, and he never did .God would be angery with him because God create Jesus as he create Adm the first man in the world.
337420
Jesus was a good little jew boy and always did what his mother told him. Joseph was just his stepdad. He was expected to be married with children by the time he was 26, so I would guess he was married and had children. To do otherwise would be irreligious. I do not know if you were aware of it but Jesus was a very religious person. Breeding was an absolute requirement of religiousity. The jewish bible said to go forth and multiply. If your brother died before having children, you were required by law to knock up his ol lady. Better hope she was cute.\nIt was the later perverted priests of the false religion formed after Jesus that gave credence to the theory that Jesus was a celibate male because the Wierd Gay priests hated women and thought that you could not be holy if you defiled yourself with female contact. So they invented the myth that Jesus was celibate and that all priests should follow suit. We now know that is hogwash to cover up the fact they are mostly gay guys and always were. Take a look at those clothes the pope and the cardinals wear man. is that gay or what?\nThe reason the "bible" does not mention it is because it was a collection of old Jewish books that were written long before Jesus was born.\nYes the new testament portion of the so-called bible was added to it by the new religion of the followers of Christ AFTER he dies, BUT those too were just the writings and ramblings of the few people that had met and known Jesus during his brief period of life. These were called "gospels", meaning good news. But some of the people that knew jesus duing his time wrote books about it did not get included in the new religion "bible' because the gay priests got together and voted them out because they did not like the messages. the messages of the other gospels are completely in accord with the notion that jesus probably had a wife and child and she was Mary Magdalene\n(not his Mom for Chrisakes, he was not incestuous) It was the Mary Magdalene that hung out with him and the guys like a groupie. Sort of like Yoko Ono. She was his favorite and the other desciples were always complaining about her . These complaints were recorded in their "gospels" too and that is why they were left out by the new Church that was trying to establish a religion that they could control the world with.\nThey had a big meeting together of all the church leaders from around the old world and decided by VOTE to exclude many gospels, and burn them, and kill anyone who mentioned them as heretics and then they proceeded to do so.\n\nAmong these were the gospels of Mary( of course) and Phillip, and Thomas and some other works of note that explained many things. It is all available on the net at NAG HAMMADI LIBRARY in Egypt. A few copies and fragments were unearthed about 35 years ago, translated and are available for anyone who cares to read them.\nit is a shame that the friends of Jesus who knew him best were not allowed to tell anyone what they knew. But that is the way of the world of organized religion, something jesus did not really like. he was like a guru with desciples who were each supposed to spread the word by mouth to individuals who would each in turn spread it to others like a big AMWAY. But they killed him and  squelched his efforts.\n\nThe Mary that jesus loved and probably married, was NOT the whore named Mary mentioned in some bible verse as a person he helped, She was another Mary (Marys? hoodathunkit)\nI guess Mary was a common name back then too. The Church Fathers deliberately decided to discredit this Good Mary by spreading the misinformation that she was this whore. They later confessed to this canard about 30 years ago and apologized to the world but everyone still mistakenly believes that the Mary that Came to see Jesus on the cross and later got his body and took it to a tomb and washed it, like a good little wife, and was the first one he appeared to, was the whore. This was meant t
148422
I think that it's a strong possibility, but you know that the "christian" homophobes will write you some nastygrams about this question.  Funny how they are both Christians and hate gays.
964522
I believe that he would.  Jesus was a definite  liberal of his time.  In my opinion, the introduction of the words sin, hell, and satan did not come from the man, Jesus.
563971
No, wouldn't change anything regarding His divinity.  The problem would be in the christians who couldn't accept the fact that He could have been a real man, which He was.  Not a normal man of course, but He was a man in ancient Israel at a time when it would have been extraordinary for any man of His age to have not been married and had kids.  The same principal as the one where Mary was suppose to have been a virgin all her life.  Wouldn't have made sense, especially since He had brothers and sisters, but for some reason, people want to believe that Joseph didn't get the marriage annuled if she'd never sleep with him.  Just kinda silly.\n\nJesus was divine, He rose from the dead and assended into heaven, and the concept that He could have been married and had kids would have nothing to do with that divinity.  I personally don't believe He did marry or have kids, but the idea that He may have would not destroy my faith.  I think a lot of christian's faith relies on what they were taught and they simply can't accept the idea.
909442
If he were the son of God and the Son of man he would be Nephilim and an abomination.  God would gladly have killed Jesus himself to get rid of him.\n\nPerhaps Gabriel and Mary got it on.....
731180
Judas and the same if they were transexuals
666009
No, according to the laws of the Old Testament, Jesus would be God's bastard Son, since God was not married to Mary when He caused her to be pregnant with His Son. By modern standards that would also make God a deadbeat Dad, but at the time no such shame was generally attached to the Father. All shame was generally borne by the mother (whore) and the Son (bastard).\n\nJoseph is merely Jesus's stepfather.
100124
well, considering those are normal bodily functions, and Jesus had a normal body, I would have to say yes.\nWhat i wanna know is, how did this even come up?\nyou have an interesting mind.
29702
i am quite positive that he did. and i think it would be to mary magdalene, who by the way was NOT a prostitute. the prostitute who was stoned to death was not named. mary magdalene's name just came subsequently after the story of the prostitute so many people immediately assumed that she was the prostitute.\n\nmary magdalene may also have been a discipple of christ, and she supposedly has a book that was omitted from the bible (it's a man's world). there are even references in scripture that mary magdalene was the one who jesus would often kiss. \n\ni dont see why so many people are so offended by the idea that jesus christ was married. whether or not he was god, he came to earth to live as MAN. i mean to be so offended at the thought of a married jesus seems as though people think marraige is wrong. i mean marriage is supposed to be sacred to christians, why shouldn't jesus have done it?
35912
NO WAY. The Bible says NOTHING about Jesus Christ being married to anybody.
924598
No, Jesus is referred to as the second Adam.  See 1 Cor 15:45.
1147375
while the bible does [rather ridiculously, of course] condemn gay sex in other places and ways, this should, logically, show those people who are so proud of the "adam and steve" quip how stupid they are.\n\nand fr_chuck, your constant discussion of a "cure" for gay people is terribly offensive.  perhaps i might redirect your medical zeal to something more personally important to you: obesity, or male pattern baldness, maybe?\n\nedit, to mickey:\nmaybe jesus was queer as well as single.  don't just assume.
685805
Priory of Sion and Da Vinci notwithstanding, of course it is possible. Remember that there are many years in the life of Jesus not accounted for in the Bible. Anyone who thinks that he did not have relations during this time period is being a little naive. I'm not saying that there is a conspiracy, just that we need to look at him as a man. Now...what would Jesus do?