if susceptibility of magnetic substances is found to be independent of temperature then it is?
369221
If susceptibility of magnetic substances is found to be independent of temperature, then it is dependent on atmospheric humidity.
1076485
i dont know much about physics but i did a search and this is what i got hope it has what you're looking for:\n\nhttp://science.electronicsinfoline.com/Physics/Electricity_and_Magnetism/
539149
A bit rusty, but here it goes - I beleive they subtract fro m the net magnetization. If some of the ions are anti-aligned it is called ferrimagnetic. If the ions anti-align completely it is called antiferrmagnetic.
1136539
Paramagnetic materials like Aluminum have magnetic properties, but cannot sustain a permanent dipole moment alignment. Hence it qualifies as a candidate for your question.\n\nAlso ferromagnetic materials (common ones are Cobalt, Iron, and Nickel) above their associated curie temperatures behave the same way. No permanent magnetization.
73795
Nothing.  Temperature is actually the kinetic energy of   countless atoms in a given space.  At 0 kelvin the atoms would stop moving.
212537
Well considering temperature is just a measure of the speed of the particles moving in a substance, the lowest temperature would be where there is no motion in the particles of a substance. This is called absolute zero which is measured as −459.67°F. This has never been acheived by scientists but they have come to within several thousanths of a degree away from it.
975911
First of all, I'm not professional of physical. I don't know at all, but Iron and steel are really high permeability, and strongly attract to magnet. Seem like the steel bar would tell you which one rely force electron. I don't think Iron has any thing to do with steel.
268504
I'm not sure anyone really "know" but there are many teltail clues.  Not all materials are magnetic except perhaps under very powerful magnetic fluxes (MRI's?) but all atoms of materials do have one or more electrons orbiting their nuclii.  We know that electrons can be directed by magnetic flux, perhaps in a TV picture tube, etc.  Therefore, the number and arrangements of electrons of the atoms differ and some create magnetic properties (dipoles or two different poles).  If an iron bar is heated to a high temperature all the iron atoms in the bar are permitted to spin around willy-nilly.  If the bar is then cooled while exposed to a strong magnetic flux (electromagnet?) all its dipoles will align uniformly with the external flux like the needles of compasses aligned with the earth's flux.  When cool, the magnet exhibits the combined strength of all the dipoles that were previously working against each other.  We know that atoms repel each other because of their electrons (and even their nuclii must be forced together to fuse because of protons) like basketballs with ballbearings at their centers, where the skins are made of rapidly orbitting electrons.  Whereas the basketballs would repel each other in any given positions, actual atoms in iron crystals repel directionally and they which can attract or repel a free electron.  The magnet has collectively directed their combined force.  If each dipole has a North and South pole, we would expect the entire magnet to also have a North and South pole, and for like poles to repel, just as in the individual dipoles.  Hope that helps a little.
886336
Different metals have different magnetic field strengths.\n\nFor example, neodymium magnets are among the strongest.
161570
Metals become magnetized more easily than other materials because of the way in which their molecules bind to each other.  The positive nucleii align while the surrounding electrons (negatively charged) float around in a "sea of electrons."  Because magnetism is simply the attraction of positive charge to negative, anything can become magnetic, though it may take more work to break the electrons free of their orbits around the central positively charged nucleus.  The strength of magnetism is directly related to the amount of energy it takes to bring the electrons away from their positions around the nucleus.  In metals' case, it takes little.  In an MRI, it is actually water that is magnetized.
1053114
If you perform a spectral analysis on the data you will see interesting details involving peaks and valleys pertaining to very low frequencies (these are periodicities in multiple years - even hundreds of years given enough data). So yes, the temperature at one point in time is related to the temperature at another, otherwise we will have a flat or horizontal spectra with no peaks and valleys.\n\nThis does not tel us about causality however...
603148
Magnetism is an inherent property of a material or object, e.g. the earth.\n\nElectromagnetism is magnetism created by an electrical field - electromagnet - and these can be found all over the place - electrical relays, doorbells (check yours you will almost certainly find that it contains an electromagnet, etc.\n\nIn most cases when the current is turned off the electromagnetism goes.  However, it is possible to magnetise something permanently by use of electromagnetism.
979029
It is not really of great practical use because it only occurs with superconductors, most effectively with type 1 supercondustors which have to be cooled to around -265 Centigrade. This is not very practical. The Meissner effect is also quenched by large magnetic fields.
356898
I don't think magnetic field varies a lot in another medium such as water.
290402
Yes. Since temperature is a measurement of average kinetic energy of an atom, when you get to the point that atoms disassociate (come apart), you no longer have anything to measure.\n\nHowever, above that certain point, the kinetic energy of a system is measured by particle energy.\n\nIf you look at big bang theories, you will note that the universe began at a high temp, which would probably be the maximum.
841413
Under normal conditions, magnets only affect the ferromagnetic elements (iron, cobalt, and nickel). So unless you have an abnormal amount of metallic iron in your body and the magnet is REALLY strong (think MRI strong) you should be fine.\n\nUnder abnormal conditions, liquid oxygen is magnetic, but it's a different kind of magnetism.
994808
All bodies possess magnetic properties. But the degrees to which they possess these properties differ from each other.\n\nThe degree is determined by the following two facts:\n\n1.)  The forces and the torques that a magnetic field exerts on these bodies.\n\n2.) The distortion that a body produces in a magnetic field, when it is placed in that field. \n\nDepending upon the above properties, materials are divided into three categories; para, dia and ferro magnetic materials.\n\nThe permeability of para magnetic substances is greater than unity; the permeability of dia magnetic substances is less than unity.  The permeability of ferro magnetic substance is much greater than unity. \n\nPara and dia magnetic substances do not distort the magnetic field (second test).\nTheir properties are measured only by the force experienced by them when they are placed in a magnetic field. (First test and also answer to your question)\n\nFerro magnetic substances like iron distort heavily the magnetic field; experience greater force; most importantly they experience torque. Therefore their properties are measured by the torque experienced by them.\n\nBecause of our familiarity with the property of ferro magnetic substances, we have a doubt whether other substances do have magnetic properties. \n\nBut in reality all substances do have magnetic properties. \n\nThe magnetic properties are due to the circulating electrons around the nucleus; this equivalent to a current and hence they produce a magnetic dipole.  The resultant of the dipole moments differs from substance to substance.