What do you like (or dislike) about the movie "V for Vendetta"?
364842
The references to Hamlet.  According to A.C. Bradley's theory of Hamlet, Hamlet's heroic characteristic was his powers of observation.  I picked up on the similarites between the movie "V for Vendetta" and Hamlet after V repeatedly says that the female character is "very observant".  \n\nBoth V and the female character were "reborn" in their own way.  V was reborn through the flames of the medical experiment facility.  The female Character was reborn after her UNREAL experience, but became a new person after she came to the conclusion that she should not be afraid. \n\n This is very similar to Hamlet, where Hamlet's fater the former king rose from the dead and from Purgatory.  Purgatory is similar hell, because Hamlet's fater complains of the Horrors that he must experience during the daytime.  Hamlet through out the play is liveing an UNREAL life.  He is constanlty hiding his thoughts and intentions from everyone he knows just as the female character does from the facist society that she lives in.  Hamlet is reborn by realizing that "readyness is all", meaning that the world is waiting for you and you need to live in the moment.\n\nHamlet's father came from a Hell-like place just as V did.  Hamlet avioded conflict at all costs and had the "Heart of a Poet" just as the female character did.\n\nMany countries banned the play Hamlet, because it was about overthrowing a king.  This is similar to what that rediculous NY Times reporter said about the movie.
1142083
I liked it...you just have to ignore all the obvious things like his perfect hair, and his perfect suit that never gets damaged no matter how many times it gets burned by fire or shot by bullets.\n\nIDK...Superman is the best! What can you say against him?\n\nThey can't add bad hygiene to his weakness list, or else it might over shadow the fact that Kryptonite is the only thing that can kill the great Superman!\n\nLOL!!! \n\nEhhh...give the guy a break! He has to save the whole world for crying out loud! Give'm a little gratitude - throw him a bone! : D \n\nThe action was awesome along with the special effects!\n\nThe cinematography was impeccable!\n\nKevin Spacey as Lex Luther was a genius!\n\nThey could have improved the storyline a bit, but it was ok!\n\nAwesome!\n\nTwo thumbs up! : D\n\nGo Superman!
997593
It was a well done movie, I thought.  The performances were great.  I liked the circular nature of the narrative.\n\nHowever, it is basically the same statement over and over again, "Everyone's a racist".  That's a statement I find a bit too simplistic.
97286
Are you refering to the first?  I personally thought it was a great movie.  Parts of it were kinda boring, but I loved the ending.  I think what I liked the most though was the moral message behind the movie.
594508
History of Violence - Both love scenes especially the one on the staircase - It was spectacular.\nIt was between Viggo Mortensen and Maria Bellos (I'm sure I am not spelling their name right)\nFor those who haven't seen the movie - You have to. To me it was the best movie of the year.
646624
Yes, saw it.  V's personality was very complex, he was definitely tortured, I think he wanted revenge more than a free society and the good that came out of it was only second.  I think it is Evey who grounded him, but I did not care for his personality-I read the original comics as a kid and I definitely did not like his personality he was an evil man, and just because good came form his vengeance does not mean his actions were good.  I enjoyed the movie greatly even though they made him have a more likeable personality.
246964
It was a great movie. It kept you guessing about what would happen next. \n\nSPOILER: This is for Agent_Check who had questions about the end.\n\nHe had the diamond in his pocket because the robber put it there when he bumped into him at the end.
733278
Just saw this at the World 3-D Film Expo and wasn't overly taken with this re-imagining of the original. If it weren't for the use of the 3-D and CGI this would be headed straight to the bargain DVD section of your local Walmart.\n\nI really wanted to like this movie more than I did. It had lots going for it. A sold-out premier in high definition 3-D using the polarized glasses instead of the inferior red/blue glasses. They used special cameras as well as stedicam in shooting the entire movie. So, it looked as good as it was going to get.\n\nBut...geeking out is just not enough to carry an entire movie...\n\nThe script was clunky with some odd use of dated language mixed with present day dialog. A couple mis-castings didn't help matters much either.\n\nAnd, it just wasn't creepy or scary...at all...
1004518
I liked it...you just have to ignore all the obvious things like his perfect hair, and his perfect suit that never gets damaged no matter how many times it gets burned by fire or shot by bullets.\n\nIDK...Superman is the best! What can you say against him?\n\nThey can't add bad hygiene to his weakness list, or else it might over shadow the fact that Kryptonite is the only thing that can kill the great Superman!\n\nLOL!!! \n\nEhhh...give the guy a break! He has to save the whole world for crying out loud! Give'm a little gratitude - throw him a bone! : D \n\nThe action was awesome along with the special effects!\n\nThe cinematography was impeccable!\n\nKevin Spacey as Lex Luther was a genius!\n\nThey could have improved the storyline a bit, but it was ok!\n\nAwesome!\n\nTwo thumbs up!  : D\n\nGo Superman!
593626
To explain about the general plot, this movie will sound really boring. First the movie is in Black and White. What makes it even "weaker" is that at the begining of the movie, 12 men walk into a small room; a little over 1 hour later, the 12 men walk out of the room after a long series of talking, and the movie is over. Sounds boring eh? \nWRONG! This movie is absolutely fascinating and captivating! Now let me explain this first: I think my favorite movie genre are the medival battle movies like Braveheart. I like big war scenes and how people die for their country because of what they believe. Court-Jury movies usually don't captivate me. However, I think there are High-Quality movies and horrible movies in every genre. So my collection tries to find the best movies in each genre. So why would a movie with such low visual and mediocre general plot(not to mention romance, humor, and all that) make it into my collection? Well, the high quality part about this movie is that it challenges your mind directly. The more confidence you are with your intelligence, the more stunned you will be with this movie. \n\nAnyways, down to some numbers:\n\nVisual: 75\nAudio: 80\nScenes: 70\nGeneral Plot: 82\nSpecific Plot: 96\nIntensity: 95\nConsistency: 92\nSurprise Factor: 92\nIntelligence: 93\nEnding: 88\nHumor: N/A\nRomance: N/A\n\nAs you can see, this movie has quite a few low points. This is due to the oldness of the movie and the simple elements of it. The beauty of the movie, however, is how the movie makes you become sure on one thing, and then suddenly challenges your thought. It brings up doubt in a doubtless situation.\n\nVisual is Black and white, so no good points in it. The camera and light contrast is pretty good, so I still give it a 75. There are no particularly exciting music or sound effects....which would ruin the movie if there was. But anyways, I have to give a point to that so there it is. The music fits well into the mood of the movie though. \nNo great scences in the movie. Everything you see you have a good chance of seeing at home or outside: tables, people talking, conflicts, arguments...etc. \nIntensity is a high point in the movie. During the movie, although nothing exciting is happening, you can feel how intense everyone is. The hot air, people's tempers, fitting different personalities into one room and planning to come out with one opinion; you can almost feel that you are in the room and ready to argue. The conversations are also never pointless, each making a point a developing a character's personality. Basically, this keeps your attention on the movie. \n\nThe movie is quite consistent too. There arn't really places where you feel like the pace is too slow or nothing is happening. Every minute of the movie is consistently pretty good and making the movie a little better. \n\nThe surprise factor in this movie that I identified is not ones like Fight Club, Vanilla Sky, or Entrapment where what is real appears to be not. It simplies surprises you with statements that make you think "Wow, why didn't I think of that? Hmmm, I'm still not convinced though." And then after awhile, he points out another thing that you didn't think of that convinces you. After awhile, you'll change from a stuborn person to a convinced one. \n\nThe enjoyment of the movie is simply being sure of something, and then being convince the contrary. I consider myself quite intellectual and I love to argue. Most of the times I am right. This movie made me quite wrong (I would raise my hands with the 11 Juries) and I simply love it. Watch it and you won't regret.\n\nI havn't seen the new 12 angry men with color yet, so if everything else in the new one is just as good, it will be terrific and certain qualify with higher points. Anyways, overall I give this movie a 92. Go watch it.
528195
If you liked V then you should check out Equilibrium with Christian Bale. Helluva movie considering the low budget it was done with. Kurt Wimmer (Director) is a genius, he just recently did Ultraviolet which I wanna see regardless of the hokey storyline.
236863
To be honest, "V for Vendetta" has nothing to do with the Bush administration... the original graphic novel is actually a rebuke of former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and the movie in its released form is still, due to its setting, more of an anti-Blair piece than an anti-Bush one.  The anti-Bush overtones seem mostly to be played up by a media that wishes they existed.
173567
What i liked about the movie:\nThe fact that there were some pretty good looking babes in it and it was hilarious. I know it's the movie is not based on a true story but it kinda proves that men can be as misleading as women. (it's like sharon stone said, "Women can fake orgasms, but men can fake entire relationships"). I also like that little vibrant kinky red-head! Grrrarrr! 8)\n\nWhat i did not like about the movie? Hmm...hard one. Ahh..i got it..the fact that i was not in it 8P
470738
V for Vendetta was an awesome movie! It was very entertaining and thought provoking. I would see it again because it was that good. Every moment of it kept me entertained. It was a very good plot and I loved the point of the movie.
528444
It was a good movie.    The movie was done well.  There was more too it than just another war movie.  It mixed in romance, drama, and action all into one movie. \n  I an not one who watches love stories especially if it is suppose to be about one of the things that took us into WWII.  But I do agree with you.
490818
I bought for me and 4 friends. They bought the popcorn and soda. I was the only one who read the book first. It was so good I had to see the movie. I wasn't disappointed. Everyone loved the movie. \n\nThe movie was very close to the book, but the reading the book first is a good idea, because it's a complicated mystery and requires you to think a bit. \n\nI'd say the professional movie critics didn't like it because it was a cerebral, intellectual movie as opposed to a slam-bang, shoot 'em up, fireworks and explosions, SFX kind of movie. It isn't a WOW! LOOK AT THAT! kind of movie, but it is definitely a WOW! \n\nThe dialogue definitely stabs the Catholic Church right between the eyes and this is another reason why many people have a problem with it.\n\nEnjoy the mystery, the chase, the plot and the shocking surprises, one right after another. I would definitely pay to see it again, but only for the purpose of entertaining a friend who hasn't seen it.
285556
http://movies.yahoo.com/\nmy opinion v for vendetta i wanna see it