who is better curtis martin or martial faulk?
361361
For about a f5 year period Faulk was the most deadly player in football. He could run inside & outside. He was aswome catching the ball on screens and even lining up as a wideout. Very similar to Tomlinson.\n\nCurtis Martin is mister durable. Strait ahead runner. Been very good for along time. Fair as a receiver.\n\nI would have to say that Faulk has hall of fame numbers for 5 years with the Rams but nothing with the Colts. Martin was good with NE and the jets every year.\n\n\nMARTIN is my vote!!!
641158
Rooney ... defo ... he's from Croxteth in Liverpool ... you gotta be well hard too live there !!!
145796
Mark Martin has been in the Chase since it started and consistantly finished in the top ten prior to that. I'm glad he'll be around one more season.
654693
I would say this season probably Shane O'Bree. He has also improved heaps. I think Anthony Rocca has improved greatly and Nathan Buckley is always a star. Although Heath Shaw and Dale Thomas look like great future stars. I just wish Paul Licuria would learn to kick.
1046813
I would go with Curtis Martin.  He has played more games (CM-168 TB-138) and had fewer fumbles (CM-29 TB-39)  to start.\n\nHe has far better averages for rushing stats (Tiki leads only in average rush)\n\nRush:  CM - 3518  TB - 1890 \nYards:  CM - 14101  TB - 8787\nYds / Game:  CM - 83.9  TB - 63.7\nAverage:  CM - 4.0  TB - 4.6\nTD:  CM - 90  TB - 50\n\nHis receiving stats aren't as good as Tiki's, but the question is about being a Running Back, not a receiver.
347650
Warren Moon was 10 times better than both of them....but I would say McNabb is the better QB, although I think Vick is probably more athletic.
634013
Both injured so much, its hard to tell. Rogers on form though is currently better. Gits has huge potential to improve for the WC 07.
934082
I always felt Dean Martin had a far better voice and was a better showman than Frank Sinatra.  Sinatra had the bigger ego and had better contacts to get ahead.
530207
Chris Messina\nhttp://www.ftppro.com/library/six_feet_under
7103
Both are two of the greatest and toughest athletes in sports. Favre's wife has cancer, and he played a great game after his father's death. Although he leads the league in INTs this year, he is a sure-fire Hall of Famer no matter what he does the rest of his career.\n\nBut my vote as toughest would go to Armstrong. He survived cancer, and went on to win seven straight Tour De France. Cycling isn't such a popular sport anymore now that Lance has stopped. I'm not saying I like one over the other, though. Both are incredible people.
169045
I would say Martin but only because he's made more movies and more comedy specials plus he had his own sitcom for what?, 4 or 5 seasons.\nBut, Chapelle is most definitely more funnier and it seems like he is more popular and the money will start to roll in for him.  You had to have heard about the $50 million deal, if he accepts. Plus, he's been on Oprah.  Now that's the real way to measure success. LOL.
98532
Van Damme would win hands down. Steven Seagal's technique sucks. He has no control, and is in poor physical shape. I've worked with him, and he isn't all that good. He often hurts his stunt people because he isn't careful or well disciplined. Van Damme is very well disciplined. His technique is better and MUCH more precise. He is also a more patient fighter with more durability and stamina.
1067177
Mark Martin,just like your picks.He's the best.
402875
Paulo Roberto Falcão. He is widely considered one of the best player AS Roma have ever had, and one of the most talented midfielders ever. He helped Roma win one league title, and reach their only European Cup final. \n\nForza Roma!!!!
785802
booker and curtis. ever since joey harrington came in booker has been doin better and kevin curtis will get open on the deep routes all day
1095559
Matt Hasselback, becuase you specifically said right now. Brett Favre is one of the greatest/toughest  QBs in NFL history, but Hasselback is younger and slightly better QB than Favre is now.  Favre throws way too many interceptions. Alot of Favre's passes are go for broke (big plays/touchdowns/let the receiver catch in triple coverage), he was great at doing when he was younger and he was better decision maker.  He didn't throw as nearly as many picks as he does now.  I\n\nHasselback is not a playmaker like Favre, but he manages the game better and does not throw as many costly interceptions as Favre.
985804
Zinedine Zidane or Ronaldinho Gaucho