can any body frame a sentence using "becuase" 3 times successively?
358406
The English Teacher told the children to ues the word "because", because "because" sounds better than, "cuz" when writing an English Paper.
380519
At least more than 3 times.
946542
Ask the question 3 times why don't you.
566744
4 to 5 times in one row
850301
You're doing well, keep up the good work. Needs to be three syllables instead of four though if you think about it. Symmetry only has three.
281432
This is a paradox!! Cannot be resolved. It is just like saying that "This sentence hass 3 misttakd."
647749
The first one is correct.\n\nThe second would be correct if you changed the is to has.\n\nHTH
962195
A IS TRUE\nB IS TRUE\n3 IS I DONNO\n4 IS TRUE
152201
Ask the question again but next time compose a coherent sentence.
720464
When you say "Todays" aside from being grammatically incorrect it implies that you ask one per day, this is the third one I've seen.\n\nBtw, that's d*mn funny, I don't think he'd lose his job.
261796
Compound sentences use words like..(but and ). Those are words that join sentences or help add more. You do not change the sentence you simply join them together....\n\nThe rabbit jumped into the bushes and the dog followed it.
1011256
Would you mind repeating all of that, only this time in English?
52099
SHAKE YOUR THING IN THE AIR THREE TIME YELLING YEE HA
186597
It's a shame the asker didn't include more of the surrounding text from this article so it could be analyzed more closely.  \n\nAnyhow, grammarians will concur that the structure:  \n\n"...active surveillance and robust peer intervention among high-risk groups such as female sex workers had had an impact in the South..." ,\n\nIS, technically, correct.  Sacramento Dweller was correct in identifying this seemingly awkward grammatical structure as a matter of tense.  Sentences utilizing this particular structure generally fall under the category of "Conditional Sentences."  Sentences featuring the 'had had' syntax are classified as "The Third Conditional," or "Conditional Type Three," and can generally be diagnosed by analyzing them for similarities with following structural formulae:\n\n(The Type 3 Conditional / Third Conditional Formula:)\n\n" IF + <insert past perfect tense verb> + <insert perfect conditional tense verb> = RESULT OF SUPPOSED CONDITIONS.*\n\n*~NOTE:  RESULT(S) of the supposed conditions usually resemble one of the following two structures, depending on when events occurred:  \n\n(1.) Result:  <insert simple present or past tense verb to express an obvious, or predictable fact / outcome>\n\n(2.) Result:  <insert modal verb  + simple present or past tense verb to express a known fact / outcome >\n\nEXAMPLE #1:  "If you had had proper training as an assassin, we would not be in this situation..."\n\nEXAMPLE #2:  "If I'd had proper training as an assassin, you probably wouldn't be here to complain."\n\n(Notice how in EXAMPLE #2, the contractions 'I'd' is used instead of saying, 'I had had' to illustrate the terms of the condition being discussed, though still allowing the reader to ascertain and understand the time-frame and sequence in which events occcurred?)\n\nRules for proper usage of the "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure state that the structures are 'to be used when talking about unreal, or "hypothetical" situations occurring in the past.'  That means, the related events DID NOT 'ACTUALLY' HAPPEN in the past.  Sentences utilizing this structure are almost always phrased to reckon, "If circumstances were different, what could / would have this been like?"  \n\nThe expression of time / tense in this [third] variety of conditional sentence structure IS identified as the past, and indicates that an action was completed "in" the past.  The condition and / or result, therefore, cannot logically be fulfilled because the action in the "IF" clause never actually happened.  Action in "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure is almost ALWAYS characterized by the quality of being absurd, and impossible to achieve.\n\nTense and Terminology?\n\n-Simple Present Tense:  Expresses a fact, habit/routine, or ability.\n\n-Simple Past:  Implies that the action happened before and is not happening anymore.\n\n-Past Perfect (Pluperfect) Tense:  Relates that an action or event ended prior to another action or event.\n\n-Present Perfect (Continuous) [Past-composite] Tense:  Indicates either events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Perfect (Conditional) Tense: Relates varying degrees of certianty or uncertainty about events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Modal Verbs:  incorporated with other verbs to illustrate the notion of possibility, impossability, necessity or other degree of probability.
1010831
1. to be\n2. not to be\n3. that is the question!
248887
can it be exlained in one word?
698038
Gone Car - Jay and R M both have the right idea here. For purposes of clarity and ease of understanding, whenever possible a pronoun should be used in a sentence after the noun to which it refers. The sentence as you present it is not good English for this reason. Instead you could say here\n\n"Do you think it is a good idea when we study a sentence to break it and then restructure it?"\n\nor \n\n "Do you think it is a good idea to break a sentence and then reconstruct it when we are studying it?"\n\nor \n\n"Do you think, when we study a sentence, it is a good idea to break it and then restructure it?"\n\nor\n\n"When we study a sentence is it a good idea, do you think, to break it and then restructure it?"\n\n\nThese sentences are all correct, but I like the first two a little more than the last two because I think they are simpler in form and therefore a little easier to understand.  Notice though that in all four sentences here the "it"  which occurs twice and which refers to "sentence" is found both times after the word "sentence" has already been used. That just makes it easier for everyone to understand. Note also that in the first sentence you could include commas after "idea" and "sentence" if you like.\n\n-m