was 9/11 a conspiracy? is the us government responsible? have you seen 9/11 loose change?
357017
Larry Silverstein Purchased The WTC Within A Year Of The Attacks And 6 Months B4 The Attacks(9/11), He Insured The WTC Complex For A RECORD 7 BILLION $$(With A Clause In The Policy SPECIFICALLY Covering A TERRORIST ATTACK)\n\nWell.. Mr. Silverstein Recently Purchased The Sears Tower And A Short Time Ago, Insured It For ANOTHER RECORD(UnDisclosed)Amount....\n\nThe SECURITY For WTC Was Provided By (Get This) MARVIN BUSH\nA Brother To George W And Jeb(Which May Explain How The FOLLOWING May Have Occurred)\n\nIt Is Being Investigated That The Buildings Were RIGGED For CONTROLLED FALL( Which Would Have Taken MONTHS)\nIncluding Building #7 (Which Was NOT HIT BY A PLANE And Had Minimal Fire Damage)\nIt Has Been Stated By Structural Engineers(Independant Of The Hokey Investigation By The Bush Crime Family)That It WAS NOT POSSIBLE That WTC 1 and 2 COLLAPSED From The Impact Of The Planes That Hit Them\nThe REASON BLDG 7 Was Destroyed Was To Conceal The EVIDENCE That The Buildings Were Dropped From A Control Bunker In The Basement(Where The Technicians "Ignited The Fuses" So To Speak)\nIt Is VERY Difficult To PROVE As The EVIDENCE Of These Crimes ( THE DEBRIS FROM THE COLLAPSES)Were HURRIED AWAY TO CHINA For RECYCLING After The Disaster\nThe So Called TERRORISTS That Were SUPPOSEDLY Flying Those Planes (Mohammed Atta And His 19 Friends) Well..16 Of The 19 Are In Fact Proven ALIVE With The Other 3 UnAccounted For ,But Presumed ALIVE\nIt Has Been Speculated That The 2 Planes Tht Hit The Towers Were Remotely Operated By The Military With NOONE Aboard\nFlight 93 (The One That "CRASHED" In PA) Is In Fact STILL In Service\nAnd At This Time , There Is NO EVIDENCE That A Plane Crashed Into The Pentagon, Although Something(A US Tomahawk Missile???) Did Fly Into And Destroy A Portion Of It\n\nWhat Ive Told You Is In EVIDENCE In A Theory Behind The Trade Center Attack Being An INSIDE JOB ORCHESTRATED By The BUSH Crime Family , And BLAMED On TERRORISTS So That Bush Could ILLEGALLY Go To War(Without The Approval Of Congress)\n\nFor MORE On This See: Alex Jones At Ground Zero\n\nhttp://martiallaw911.info/video.htm......\n\nSee Also: Loose Change 2nd Edition (Google It)\n\nhttp://www.world-action.co.uk/explosives...\n\nhttp://www.commondreams.org/views03/0204...\n\nhttp://www.realestatejournal.com/propert...\n\nhttp://martiallaw911.info/video.htm...\n\nIMPEACH BUSH NOW
635126
C’mon: Do you really think nineteen guys with box cutters were behind 9/11? Then why, when no steel-frame building had ever collapsed from fire, did three fall down that day? (One, 7 WTC, wasn’t even hit.) How could a terrorist’s passport emerge in perfect condition? Why was it so important to clear debris before all the bodies were recovered? Did the U.S. secretly plan the whole thing? The 9/11 conspiracy theorists have it all figured out.
592602
that the u.s. government helped plan and carry out the attacks on 9/11.  it's my favorite because it's true, and because people ought to know.  here's the evidence:\n\nthey think they'll get away with it because they know people are afraid to admit that they believe in a conspiracy.  to quote v for vendetta; "if our government was responsible for the deaths of thousands of our own citizens, would you really want to know?"
1166933
This video is very compelling evidence that there's a lot more to the events of 9/11 than most people know.  A few of the things in the Loose Change video are inaccurate, but it compiles enough accurate information to lead to further questions.  \n\nTo the people who say things like "this has all been disproven" or "it's just conspiracy theories" you are fooling yourselves.  The famous philospher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) said “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident”.  People will believe any lie either because they want it to be true, or because they fear it is true.  The lie you are believing is that the official story of how the events of 9/11 occurred are true.  When you OBJECTIVELY analysis the scientific evidence -- as a detective or scientist would -- without injecting false patriatism into the equation -- you realize that it is simply physically impossible that things happened as we've been led to believe.\nAnd  as a side note, questioning the events of 9/11 is NOT unpatriotic.  On the contrary, it's about the most patriotic thing you can do.  We have a duty to defend this great nation of ours against ALL threats, foriegn AND DOMESTIC.  And the families of the victims of 9/11 have a right to know the TRUTH of how and why their loved ones died.  In that spirit, I present the following very small bits of information concerning the events of 9/11.\n\nYou can’t collapse a skyscraper with jet fuel.\nMany engineers have come forward and said that there’s no way those buildings fell from fire.  Steel doesn’t weaken until almost 2000 degrees F, and it doesn’t melt until almost 3000 degrees F.  Jet fuel doesn’t burn hot enough to do it.\nThe official NIST report states “The initial jet fuel fires themselves lasted at most a few minutes” and office material fires would burn out within about 20 minutes in a given location. (NIST, 2005; p. 179, emphasis added.)   The final NIST report on the Towers admits:  \n"Of the more than 170 areas examined on 16 perimeter column panels, only three columns had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250ºC… Only two core column specimens had sufficient paint remaining to make such an analysis, and their temperatures did not reach 250 ºC. ... Using metallographic analysis, NIST determined that there was no evidence that any of the samples had reached temperatures above 600 ºC."  (NIST, 2005, pp. 176-177) \nKevin Ryan, the engineer from the company that underwrote the towers, said it was impossible that a jet fuel fire brought the towers down.  The architect who designed the twin towers has repeatedly said that he designed them to take not 1, but 2, massive passenger airliner impacts and not fall.  \nPools of molten steel were found in the basements of the towers (including tower 7) weeks after 9/11.  Steel melts at 2777 degrees F.  Jet fuel burns at only 1577 degrees F.  It is literally impossible for jet fuel fires to get hot enough to melt steel into molten pools.  Something else must have done it.\n\nFirefighters and survivors said repeatedly that bombs were going off throughout the towers, on many different floors. Firefighters gave very specific descriptions of seeing flashes of light and explosions going off on the lower levels.   If you watch the news from that morning, you'll even see Fox news reporting a "4th explosion" going off in tower 1.   For instance, at the start of the collapse of the South Tower a Fox  News anchor reported:   “There is an explosion at the base of the building… white smoke from the bottom… something happened at the base of the building!  Then another explosion.”\nFirefighter Edward Cachia independently reported:  \n“[We] thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came
687691
I do believe Bush and his people are behind the 9-11 attacks. Nothing out of the whole official explanation makes any sense at all. Its got more holes than a swiss cheese for christs sake. Cell phones on the plane? Where were the bodies from Pennsylvania? Etc Etc\n\nTwo of the planes are still flying around in broad fucking daylight and people are still believing the official lies. The level of denial in some people is just downright frightening.\n\n\npeace
71976
I believe that Bin Laden was responsible for the attacks, yes. Unfortunately, people have (a reasonable) tendency to question anything 'official' or 'government-related', so they turn to explanations involving aliens, missiles, CIA, Freemasons, and the Mossad.\n\nHere's the thing : Why the hell would a country send four airplanes to smash into their own buildings, and to kill their own people? That's just stupid.\nAnd if the government is lying, then what happened to the victims? The planes? Saying "it's a conspiracy" tells the families of the dead, and the survivors, that they died for nothing.
1098154
you are right to be curious, there are major cover-ups going on regarding 9/11. i would invite you to view www.911truth.org (i'm not affiliated with them).  also www.scholarsfor911truth.org .\n\nthere are many more but those will get you started :)
1133783
This is a little long, but very insightful and thorough.  If you have some time you NEED to watch this.\n\nhttp://www.planetquo.com/Loony-9-11-Conspiracy-Theories\n\nI think that there is something bigger going on here.
850389
Sadly, I believe are government had everything to do with 9/11.  Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence I have been able to find.  \n\nFAKE CONFESSION\nThe official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.\nhttp://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg\n\nEVIDENCE\nThere are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.\nhttp://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM\n\nHere is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=\n\nMolten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid.  Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.\nhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ\n\nFORENSICS\nA chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.\nhttp://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml\n\nCONFESSION \nWe also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329\n\nTESTIMONY\nThere is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon..."\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=\n \nThis video, obtained by a public interest group, shows the top rear fin of an air craft hiding behind a call box: Whatever is hiding back there, is under 48 ft. long, to small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 ft. long.\nhttp://www.clipaday.com/2006/05/pentagon_plane_crash_from_sept.html\n\nMOTIVE\nThe New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.\nhttp://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf\n\nOPPORTUNITY\nWitnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks p
1160864
lucky2bealive, I don't want to disagree with you but I don't believe you are going to find anywhere in the historical records that Bin Laden claimed responsibility for the 9/11 bombings. What he has done is praise the matyrs of that event. However, there would be more clarity and the issue can be put to bed finally if the government gave us the names of all the people that died in the various events. Where are the planes that crashed? Do you really believe that a building like the Pentagon would have cameras that are intermittent and take pictures every 7/8 seconds. Come.. Come. We are talking about the most technologically advanced country in the world. Something smells fishy and the stench cannot be dispersed until the Government come clean. Have you ever seen reports of the examination of  the so called crash sites?
610473
sure 911truth and the "loose change" film both say that.  i'd like to see a more thorough and objective investigation of these claims, however. and such an investigation must not be hindered by balking attacks. is it me, or is it that any body who raises some kind of question or proposes there was an alternative explanation to 9-11, is thrown to the wolves for being a tin-hat wearing conspiracy theorist?  why can't we be more like factcheck about this? it is not helpful to be dismissive NOR is it helpful to carelessly throw unfounded paranoid ideas into these discussions. how about we investigate 9-11 using the scientific method? what a concept
1127335
Some of what is presented in "loose change" can be disputed to the point of possibly being coincidental or hear say.\n\nBut there are also things that are pointed out in the film that cannot be disputed, as it would violate the laws of physics for them to have occurred in the way that our government has led us to believe.\n\nI have been doing research on both sides of this issue and there are several items that violate physics.\n\n1. No mater how structurally compromised the struck floors were, the towers could not have fallen at free fall speed. This can only occur when there is no support anywhere under the falling structure.\n\n2. You cannot take out multiple light poles on the way into the pentagon with out leaving massive amounts of debris in the path from the poles knocking chunks out of the plane much less the flaming fuel spill it would have produced. The Boeing fuel tests proved that a plane hitting even a single light pole would rip the wing off creating a huge fireball immediately. There was no debris or scorch marks anywhere other than the scorch marks at the building itself.\n\nThe laws of physics do not conveniently change for anyone no matter how much rhetoric that people spew. We will probably never know the truth about who was responsible, but we do know that the story our government has fed us doesn't hold water.
754530
I believed the official story of 9/11 for a while. Then I woke up. Though some of the official story may be true, too much of it has been de-bunked and now it just doesnt add up. People can beleive what they like, but lets take a look at some issues of concern. Great question!\n\nWe are a country that spent five years and $100 million investigating President Clinton. We probed the depths of the Iran-Contra scandal – a debacle that would have never come fully into the public eye had a special investigator not been appointed.\n\nThe 9/11 Commission interviewed two of it's own members and spent only $3 million. We have spent far more energy, money and time seeking the leak of Valerie Plame's identity and Barry Bonds' use of steroids. \n\nDonald Rumsfeld, Gen. Myers confirm there were total of four war-games on 9/11 taking place in New York city and Washington D.C. (C-SPAN) \n\nU.S Intelligence conducted exercise to simulate plane crash into government building morning of 9/11. (Boston Globe, USA Today) \n\nRumsfeld announces Pentagon lost track of $2.3 trillion the day before it gets hit (CBS, DoD) \nFinal budget of 9/11 commission was 3 million dollars. Commission interviews two of it's own members about attacks.(Newsweek)\nBush signs Airline Transportation Stabilization Act which if 9/11 victim's families except, they can't sue airlines or US gov't for any reason. (Gurdian, LA Times) \nSept. 10, Former Pres. and ex-CIA dir. Bush Sr. met with Osama's brother at Carlyle Group meeting in D.C. and is at the White House morning of attacks. (Washington Post)\n\nPakistani president Pervez Musharaf met with the House and Senate chairs of the intelligence committee during an emergency session at 8:30am 9/11/01.(CBS Wall St Journal) \n\nMarvin Bush was head of company that did security for Dulles and WTC. Bush’s multi year WTC contract was to end on 9/11/2001. Bush signed W199I- WF-213589 months before 9 11 ordering FBI not to stop Al-Qaeda. John P. O'Neill accepted Bush’s old job. He was the 25 year head of counterterrorism with the FBI. He angrily quit the FBI as a result of George Bush’s Order W199I. His first day on the job 9/11/01 he died in the north tower.\n\nOf 18 PNAC members, 10 will be in the new Bush Admin. (ABC) \nRumsfeld predicts terrorist attack in US 2 minutes before 1st WTC plane crash (Fayetteville Observer) and later predicts Pentagon crash minutes prior. (Telegraph) \n\nFive of the alleged 9/11 hijackers receive training at secure US military bases. (MSNBC) \nFAA manager mangled, cut, and destroyed 9/11 tapes. (Washington Post) \nWhite House staff given Cipro on 9/11, full month before first cases of anthrax reported. (Washington Post)\n\nRudolph Giuliani in his testimony to the 9/11 Commission said FEMA arrived in New York on September 10th to set up a command post located at Pier 29 under the auspices of bio-warfare exercise TRIPOD II scheduled for September 12.." New York’s Command post was in building seven before it was moved to the pier hours in advance of the attacks.\n\nThe FBI has further delayed the release of a video that they promised to us on NOV 9 and that may show the impact of flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11th 2001. Out of 83 confiscated videos, we have only seen two.\n\nMade public on November 18, 1997 by the Assassination Records Review Board.\n\nActual Operation Northwoods de-classified document from George Wahington University -Home of the National Security archive.\nhttp://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/doc1.pdf\n\nWikipedia- Operation Northwoods overveiw\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods\n\nSigned into order by the CHAIRMAN and EVERY MEMBER of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the plan (read it yourself) calls for innocent Citizens to be shot on American streets; American ships to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent "terrorism" to be launched in major East coast cities.\n\nThe plan calls for Forei
1038770
The bush administration is responsible for the whole 9-11 attack. Watch 9-11: Loose Change (2nd Edition).
616775
I have seen several of the conspiracy theory films and they do make me think.\n\nThey insist that the WTC buildings one and two had to have explosive charges placed in them like a controlled demo for them to come down as fast as they did.\n\nThey show, and you can see, puffs of smoke coming out of windows floors below the floors collapsing.  Is this really PROOF that there were explosive charges.  You do not see any flashes with the puffs of smoke.\n\nThey show other tall building fires where they fires lasted longer and the buildings did not collapse.  But in the WTC collapses there were gigantic planes that hit and did a lot of structural damage.  There was also jet fuel that created the fires.  There was a tremendous amount of weight suspended above where the planes hit.  I remember thinking that it was amazing that the buildings did not fall down.  Of course, later they did.\n\nA few years ago (before 9/11/01) there was a 10 floor building being built in Bridgeport CT. There was a construction accident on one of the upper floors and the weight of what fell just massively overwhelmed the support below.  The whole building fell to the ground just like a controlled demo, just like the WTC towers.  There was no bomb, no plane hitting the building, no fire.\n\nI think that there was a lot of damage on the floors where the planes hit.  All it would take would be for one floor to fail and everything above it drops and hits the floor below.  Imagime how much weight that is.  It only gets heavier as it goes.\n\nStill, how the planes and bodies at the Pentagon and in PA completely vaporized makes you wonder.  One film says that flight 93 went to Cleveland and all the passangers were taken off the plane and that even the cell phone calls were fakes.  They do not say what happened to the real passangers after.  Were they all shot?\n\nA lot of the conspiricy theories have as many holes as the supposed cover ups.  Their idea of proof is often pretty lame.
1103787
You're trying to say the government was behind 9-11?  Please, go back to reading Harry Potter and playing computer games.  Stay away from conspiracy theories.
274082
Sparking an interest to your question, I am obliged to post what I believe is conspiracy at its best.\n\n9-11, I am going to say this right now, you may be offended by my point of view.\n\nWith reports going around, I cannot guarantee what I say is true or just rumors floating about the news and amongst the people.\n\nI've seen close up footage of the second plane colliding with the second tower of the Towers. Before the plane collides with the building, there is an explosion that erupts from the building engulfing the nose of the plane; yet the plane had not collided with the building yet. To me it seemed a little like Hollywood effects. When the third plane crashed into the Pentagon, I find it a little odd that the area the plane crashed into was completely deserted because they were "remodeling". While our nation was in a shock of awe from the "attacks", Bush was reading to kindergartners, with an upside down book.\n\nNearly hours after the "terrorist" attacks, the FBI released photos and full names of the hi-jackers. To top it all off, there was also surveillance footage of the hi-jackers in the airports. This kind of information could not be obtained and compiled to be released to the press within hours.\n\nCurrently, Bush is having an extremely hard time convincing half of America that Hussein had anything to do with the "terrorist" attacks. Bush's reason for invading Iraq is the fact that Hussein has Weapons of Mass Destruction(WMD's). While the search for these WMD's failed several times for Bush, he was becoming desperate. There were hidden reports that Bush was attempting to ship our own Nuclear Weapons to Iraq to use them as evidence against Hussein; but the weapons he was trying to ship weren't old enough to support his invasion propaganda. The only good thing Clinton did while he was in office was to dispose of all the Nuclear Weapons made in the earlier years.\n\nI've added a specific link below regarding the 9-11 conspiracy theory, I just wanted to put my two cents in.\n\nOn an unrelated note, there have also been whispers that everything we do will be recorded on video and audio tape, without our consent, in the up coming years.