Illinois v. Bush  check  this out!?
359216
It is something that needs to be done and if we leave it to the repuglicans it will never get done. Impeachment is probably not going to happen do to the control of the House but at least it will get in front of the American people and that is real important with the election coming up in November. The repuglicans are to corrupt to do it but just the publicity alone is worth the trouble. I wonder how they will spin this movement around to make their hero look good.
891133
so Greenpeace has been jailed? and you claim Bush is a liar! if you are captured on the battlefield, you are an "enemy combatant", not a suspect in custody, there is a vast difference. you have the rights guaranteed (if you're in uniform) by the Geneva Convention, not Miranda, understand? if you are not in uniform, then by the laws of war, you can be summarily executed on the field of battle without trial. this is not some new thing Bush made up, either. Major Andre, the Brit who took the plans for the defense of West Point from Bendict Arnold was summarily executed when he was captured because he was out of uniform. you libs really need to learn the laws before going off half cocked accusing someone of breaking them
957991
HE IS  A PIECE OF GARBAGE !!! He did it and there is no doubt he did it...Hell his own brother who was ther at the time refuses to testify on his behalf......\n\nIf you want the truth about this case go to http://www.danielfaulkner.com/
714328
You seem to have a valid point.  If I were you I would hire an attorney in good standing with the GOP and I would file a suit in federal court.  I think your case would be a sure winner.
72732
I don't understand how you think. You try to conect Bush with the supreme court and go on and on about bush subjugating humanity to his will. You ignore that the supreme court has MAKING laws for decades, and thats not what the founders intended it to be. This law making aspect has been used for YEARS by democracts to further their own agenda. Youre so blindly consumed with an irrational fear of Bush that you can't see the bigger picture.\n\nHere in CA we have popular votes, we have a clear majority vote, the state supreme court declares them unconstitutional. This is an overwhelmingly liberal state, with an overwhelmingly liberal court system. The democrats here have the same gripe as you when it comes to Alito but when it comes to the CA sumpreme court over throwing their vote all you hear is silence because its their own party screwing them.\n\nTo summ it up don't be so narrow in your thinking, see the forrest not just republican trees.\n\nRegards,\n\nRascal\n\nPS. you seem familiar. Didn't you work for Bill Clinton?\n\nPPS. Can I have your vote for best answer please? :)
1005697
Thank you. And it was on the news tonight that Bush is being charged with violating the Geneva convention. Let's see what the people who support Bush have to say about that.
1036990
I'll say it again and spare you the cut+pasted legal reasons,\nWWW.VOTETOIMPEACH.ORG!!!!!!!
846053
I saw that, too, and thought it was amusing.  How would you like to have been the election judge working THAT precinct??  LOL!!\n\nHopefully he had time to go home and get his card and then come back to vote!
913262
Most intelligent people read Kennedy's investigative report on autisim and thimerosal.  As a parent, I paid attention.  While it is good to know what and how the USG is bilking and raping its citizens, we are getting too entrenched in the details.  Just like the Democraps, Repukelicans will take advantage as much as possible, especially when they sense the "tide is turning".  With the onslaught of their scandals amongst other reasons, the Repukelicans sensed their time was numbered, so they made the "hail mary" play and put as much "pork" into all bills as they could.  To pretend there is a difference between the two corrupted parties is bad enough.....to question why their greed and corruption has become so rampant, is to ignore the face looking at you in the mirror.  We allowed these scumbags to place their interests over those of America.  May your chosen diety have mecy on us all.  A response to the guy who won't sue in case of medical mistake:  while I wouldn't sue if my cast itched too much, I'd sue if they set the bone wrong, or put the cast on the wrong arm....The rights and welfare of the many does not outweigh the rights and welfare of the few....for securing individual rights inevitably secure the rights of society.
368917
Again, from the documentary 'Corporation' a federal court ruled in a wrongful termination law suit that lying on television when not under any sort of oath or affirmation is NOT against the law.\n\nFox News allegedly had ordered some reporters to report misleading information about medical procedures for increasing the output of dairy cows, specifically to state the procedure was safe when that was not yet proven. When the reporters refused, they were fired. They filed lawsuit under the whistle blower federal law which protects employees who refuse to follow orders which are against the law. The Federal Judge ruled in favor of Fox, stating that lying on television is NOT against the law, and thus there is no protection for an employee who refuses to obey legal but unethical orders.\n\nAny statements that President Bush may have made, whether they were misleading as his critics would have us believe or a reasonable difference of opinion as his defenders would have us believe, were not under any specific oath or affirmation and thus are not a violation of any law. The Constitution states that the President can only be impeached for 'high crimes or misdemeanors.'\n\nPresident Clinton was impeached because of statements that were made while under oath in an ongoing trial, not for his statement in the press conference. While it is obvious that the actions he took during the affair were specifically done so in his own mind he could pretend he was not having 'sexual relations,' the majority of Americans would have to admit the actions were certainly close enough!
66659
Please read the article here:\nhttp://msmvps.com/blogs/chrisl/articles/10453.aspx
403459
They added a wheel tax back in my State, so there really isn't a tax break. I live in Indiana, and we have a Republican Governor now Mitch Daniels (crook), and Bush plant to the State. He got in on the President ticket. He just sold the 80/90 toll road to a Australian/Spanish Company that we already have paid for. So he too, is selling America. The road runs across the top of the State to the Chicago Sky-Way. Truckers are really hit.
926319
i'm not surprised, i went on the link and its the post-standard ! a typically left leaning publication and was surprised too that this professor is also liberal and liberally educated ! wow, its nice to hear someone tell the truth for a change instead of using something to back up their agendas...thanks for the link.
545652
Looks like you will NOT find it.  Note that no one using it bothers to give a specific quote or context.\n\nA web search turns up numerous cases of the very same article --a screed by Cindy Sheehan, where she lists this alongside various other positions she imagines Bush has.  \n\nNot exactly the most reliable, unbiased source.  No, if he'd said anything like this you can be sure there are plenty of journalists who would be out there reporting it!\n\n\nConsider also the slight possibility that Bush --or perhaps just a Bush supporter-- used the expression "old scrap of paper" of the Constitution, but NOT in order to denigrate it.  \n\nCompare the following random quotes from forums:\n\n*then the state is interfereing in church affairs - not legal, at least not according to a little old scrap of paper we call the "Constitution".\n\n*pick up the constitution and measure the action of the government.\nif they fall short or violate the old scrap of paper, then ANYONE... yes, anyone has the right to SUE the government, or press charges for the violation. \n\nNote that both of these speakers use this very expression for the Constitution but CLEARLY think of it very highly and are using the expression to help make that point!\n\nIt would not be difficult to imagine how a Bush-hater might come across such a phrase and jump to the conclusion it was intended negatively without stopping to check.\n\nAnd consider how easily this would happen -- someone who thinks Bush's NSA policy or whatever violates the Constitution makes a remark (their own opinion, mind you) that "Bush acts as if the Constitution is just an old scrap of paper".  That quickly becomes "Bush thinks that..."   and oh, so easily, ends up as "Bush SAID that. . . "   And of course THIS is the form that many pick up on and run with.
479070
Bravo!  I commend you for opening your eyes to the situation.  Prisonplanet should provide you with excellent links to great websites regarding building 7.  I also suggest watching "Loose change".  You can view it for FREE on Google video.
1092606
Clinton lied in court.  thats perjury!
1103728
Let's see.....Bush, the chimp;  Bush, Hitler; the stupid Bush;  the stupid Bush chimp; cross dressing cheerleader Bush:  (just a few of the names I have seen on Yahoo since I started coming on).    This is all so laughable,   Bush must be the brightest man on earth!  After all,   he aimed a hurricane at the gulf coast, he flew not one but two planes into the towers and found time to fly a third to the ground in Pa , he is single handily fighting a war, and he stole not one but two elections!!!  (this is just a small portion of the list of evil deeds libs have accused him of).  It's hard not to laugh,  Time for libs to grow up!!