are italian people circumsised?
363891
Not the vast majority of them in Italy. The only place it is commonplace is in the U.S., the rest of the world knows that it is a barbaric practice.
1014829
99% of males are circumcised without thier permission, too\n\nplease won't somebody think of the penises
612498
Firstly circumcision must be performed in the Major Religions... from biggest to smallest: Islam, Christianity, Judaism... They are circumcised due to their religious beliefs, and also for hygiene purposes, you are saying they have big penises... have you 'fukd' all of them? You whore bag
786223
My husband is circ'd but we decided to leave our son uncut...\n\nThe health reasons are bogus:  should we cut off our daughter's labia because she might get yeast infections, and it's be "cleaner"?  No way!  That's barbaric genital mutilation!  But it's ok for sons?!?\n\nAlso, roughly 40% of boys born these days are left uncut... so the "locker room" argument is also B.S.\n\nWhy hurt a baby?!?
523368
I have hear that Frankie is not circumcised - but that may not be correct. However, when the site is actually up and running, http://www.club18-35.co.uk/ is a good reference point.
1112340
it is a personal decision that people make based on religion, or if the father is circumsized, or for medical reasons. It has been found to reduce the risk of infections later in life such as STDs. There really is no benefit or difference with sexual relations (i know from experience)...
990060
No difference really.  But a circumsised penis is easier to keep clean and prevent any bad odours, which could be a turn on in some cases
757530
I am Italian...and in the same 'position' as yourself...\nSo, if you could be so kind as to let me know when you find the answer to your question, I would really appreciate it...cheers!!
691878
As a nurse, I can tell you there are no "circumcision  scars." There are only circumcised  and uncircumcised men/boys. You must be pretty foolish(that's a nice word) for us to believe any teacher/professor would allow such a ridiculous project to be worked-on. And, furthermore school and college is out right now. I have seen some sick people in my life, but get a grip. Just go buy a magazine. I cannot help but wonder if you think the rest of the people in the world are as stupid as you are to ask such a question.
618426
Circumcission is a Jewish culture thing that at one time forced upon the people of America. It is no longer forced since it is nothing more than a religious ritual. In fact you must request it now days or a Dr will suggest it . Most jewish doctors insist it is important but it is really not.\n\n  In fact it does destroy the sensitivity of a male. The bible often rebukes it as a religeous cult of the Babylonians which was introduced into Judaism as part of their cult ritual which was later imposed upon the American peoples and now is no longer required. \n\n   Jesus even rebuked the Jews as "those of the circumcission" which implies that it is not required of GOD. It is destruction of the flesh as GOD made it and any religion that practices it is merely a cult that goes against the nature and creation of GOD and implies that GOD is inept in his creation of man. It is not required by GOD nor for any such myth as cleanliness! It is simply a Judeo religeous cult which brings sin to a person because of cutting the flesh of man. It is immoral scripturally and should never be imposed upon a child until that child alone can make that decission for himself. It is mutilation of the body against GODs creation\n\n   It is simply a cult Judeo  religeous practice which the Bible warns us against in Titus 1:3-4 about believe anything that comes from the mouth of a Judaizer and how they will pervert the laws of GOD. If God who created all His creation as perfect and "good" (as stated inthe bible)  , wanted man to be circumsized then man would have been born that way. Circumcission is a cult injection into GODs perfect word and doing so brings sin against man. Circumcission is a biblical mistranslation and illegal interjection into the word of GOD. True Bible scholars know that the bible speaks of it as a cult ritual of the Judaizers and Babylonians, not that of Gods True chosen people.
723211
of course not, the process is called female circumcision. It happens only in backward tribes of Africa. In this process, the part of the vagina called the 'the female penis' or clitoris is sliced off! this procedure has been banned through out the world in most countries.\nIt is a belief in these tribes that, a woman has no right to enjoy sex and it is sinful for a woman to masturbate. Therefore they circumcise and even stitch the vagina up, so that the woman dont indulge in premarital sex. the stitches are only opened a night before the marraige ceremony.
239810
Actually, there has been some evidence that cervical cancer rates are higher among women with uncircumcised partners.\n\nThe article below indicates that uncircumsized men are at a higher risk for contracting HPV (possibly because they have more skin in the area that is prone to infection) and some strains of HPV cause cervical cancer.\n\nI remembered reading this several years ago, this article was from 04/2002.
1007641
I'm against it. There is no benefit, and once its gone you can't get it back. So if you are considering it, read up about it, check out views from doctors and women who have been through it. In some cultures they not only cut the clitoris the sew up the Virgina leaving a very small gap for menstruation and urine and when they get these women married guess what? The man forces himself through those stitches. Other cultures use the same blade and these women end up contracting diseases like AIDS. It's an evil act and it should be banned.
1052892
As an adult... stay as you are... it's a major surgery when you wait until adulthood.  As far as the theories go:  Circumcised men are cleaner, it's more enjoyable... and so on...  they have been argued... unclean people wont clean whether they're circumcised or not, and that circumcised males actually have more nerve endings.  Either way is fine if you're thinking about your children.  In America it is expected because of tradition, and some families still view the religious implication that circumcision holds.  But I wouldn't recommend it after infancy.
289016
A circumcised penis is always healthy and clean in every respect of its existence.\nIt is totally dependent on the person's personal hygiene.\nThis is why the Jews and other religions (Islam especially) specify that all males be circumcised, otherwise they are unclean.\nIt might be strange to others but it is true.\nOn the other hand Girls or women should not be circumcised,\nMany African Muslims believe that female circumcision is required by Islam. In fact, no form of genital modification and mutilation is mentioned in the Qur'an, but only in disputed hadiths. Clerics supporting female circumcision rely on a single disputed hadith and another hadith which was discredited by the consensus of scholars as forged. In Saudi Arabia (Hijaz), where Islam originated, female circumcision has never been practiced by the locals before or after Muhammad. Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, never allowed the procedure to be performed on any of his daughters. Most scholars believe it is practiced more as a result of ignorance and misconceived religious fervor, than for reasons of true religious doctrine. Many Arab Muslims interpret different passages as being in opposition to female circumcision, and believe the practice to be un-Islamic.
1141512
There is a procedure which is referred to as "female circumcision," but which is actually very different, and thoroughly disgusting.  In some countries, the father actually cuts out the clitoris, supposedly to make a woman less likely to cheat on her husband.  The idea, I suppose, is that if she does not get any pleasure from sex, she will have no incentive to take a lover.\n\nLike I said, it is thoroughly disgusting.  I was walking through an ultra-liberal bookstore once and saw a book with a photograph of the ritual.  The mother was holding the girl, dressed in her best dress and apparently bent over a chair or table, while the father was behind her skirts with his knife and the girl screamed in pain.  Why the picture was put in the book is probably in order to say it is barbaric, but I didn't need a photograph for that!
700756
I have known a number of friends from England, Germany, and France who, after living here for a while, had themselves circumcised at the urging of their wife or by friends like me.\nI am still in touch with them. I asked how they liked it and how is their sexlife now. All of them liked it very much and found that whole penis sensitivity is as good if not better than being uncircumcised. Two had a tight foreskin. They are gratetful to be rid of the pain they had in intercourse. Three had general anesthesis. Two others had local. There was no pain during the procedure. There was slight discomfort for 2 to 5 days afterward. All went back to work between 1 and 2 weeks. A good resource is www.circumcision.center in Atlanta GA. This clinic under Dr. David Cornell, a skilled urologist, is one of the best I understand. There may be others less expensive. Sometimes whether you are Jewish or not, you can find a mohel through a rabbi in a synagogue near you, who will do the circumcision at a reasonable price. Be sure to check out any urologist or mohel as to how many adult circumcisions they have performed successfully. Also figure out what type you want, high and tight, loose, etc. Anyway go for it, you won't be disappointed.