what are the similarities between IQ test and piaget's reasoning task?
357982
I dont know - but your question intrigued me, and the subject makes for interesting reading. Try this link ..\n\n\nhttp://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/piaget.html\n\nIan
158324
different halves of the brain. verbal reasoning (& hence reading) is more about emotion, math is about logic. High school classes are not that demanding, so you can get good scores in both, but it is very rare for famous mathematicians to be famous writers (Lewis Carol is an exception tho :).
686141
intelligence means you can solve a complicated problem.\n\nwisdom means you know which problem to solve.
823556
It is called the Wonderlic IQ test...\nESPN.com has a cool demonstration Wonderlic test.
670285
Einstein and Newton didn't use their brains to the maximum extent.  They just used a lot more of their brains than most people.  Also, an IQ test can be used to test ones "brilliancy", but only if it is a good one.
357738
hard to say, there are a variety of IQ tests out there.  What were the ranges for that test?  you should be able to find out that info.
298624
The GCT/ARI is a general reasoning, math, spatial relatinships and if I remember correctly, a verbal skills section.\n\nIts not really an IQ test, bet it can determine your options for specializing later on.  Lots of different schools have varying requrements for qualification.
431490
IQ = Intelligence quotient - measure of person's cognitive ability\nEQ = Emotional quotient - measure of person's ability to cope with and address situations
224879
On an IQ test scores between 85 and 115 are within the average range, low average to high average, so a score of 100 could be considered exactly average.  There is no perfect score for an IQ test.  \n\nThe most commonly used test is the Wechsler.  The Stanford Binet is another one.
94230
Emotional intelligence (EQ) might be a greater predictor of success than Intellectual intelligence (IQ), despite an assumption people with high IQs will naturally accomplish more in life.\n\nEmotional intelligence is a person's ability to understand their own emotions and those of others, and to act appropriately using these emotions.
750544
The most common IQ test given today is the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Revised (WAIS-R)  and its equivalent for children  Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - III (WISC- III).\n\nIf you want to undergo this inventory, you should find a licensed psychologist who specializes in conducting IQ assessments.  However, it will cost money.\n\nHowever, IQ is just a number, which may or may not have any validity in gauging your intelligence.  It is a very controversial entity among scientists and the general public alike.
187622
The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT) is not an intelligence test as the previous poster indicated but is an individual academic achievement test designed by the same company as the WEchsler IQ tests, and so it is easily compared to these tests.  People who use the WIAT often do so because it is so easy to do comparisons between the WIAT and the WEchsler IQ scales, making it easier to determine discrepancies, identify learning disabilities, etc.  Sometimes it is used simply to determine a child's skill level based upon that test's norms and comparing the child to other children his age.  The WIAT offers a variety of norms, which many assessors like.  Many people like it because it is administered in a similar manner to the WEchsler IQ scales, and individuals adminsitering the WIAT are often very familiar with the format for administration of the IQ tests.  The WIAT flows well, and in my opinion is a superior instrument to others of the same type - Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement or Peabody Individual Achievement Test for example, and gives a more usable range of information.  The WIAT provides a measure of both listening comprehension and reading comprehension, which helps in identifying learning disabilities.  The scores can be used to compare a child's current level of achievement with what would normally be expected at his grade or age level.\n\nThe WIAT-II presents one item at a time without time limits, except for the Written Expression subtest.  It offers standard scores, percentile ranks, stanines, and other scores, based either on the student’s age (four-month intervals for ages 4 through 13, one-year intervals for ages 14 through 16, and one interval for ages 17 through 19) or the student’s grade (fall, winter, and spring norms for  grades Pre-K through 8, full-year norms for grades 9 through 12, and separate college norms), compared to a random, stratified, nationwide sample of  3600 students.  About 9% of the students were identified as having educational disabilities, but not serious neurological disorders.  All students spoke English.  A sample of 1,069 students was given both the WIAT-II and a Wechsler Intelligence Scale so that examinees’ WIAT-II scores can be compared to achievement scores predicted from their intelligence scale scores on the basis of actual test scores from the sample.  Achievement scores predicted from intelligence tests fall closer to the mean (standard score 100, percentile rank 50) than the intelligence scores from which they are predicted.\n\nThe test can be administered by special education teachers who have completed masters level assessment courses.  It is often administered by learning disabilities specialists, reading specialists, educational psychologists, psychometrists, etc.\n\nI hope this information is helpful to you.
663953
this was an episode of married with children where the daughter forgot a fact cause she learned a new one and her brain maxed out, so she had to learn all the new facts to be in some contest,\nthen in the last second her dad goes, and daddy loves you, which replaced the fact from the start of the show, which was the winning question,\n\nultimately your question hinges on the word healthy, and based on my understanding of iq, there would be a limit to how much a person could learn in one day, one month, etc.\n\nso lets suppose we look at me, i test around 128, not bad, and i can read about 30 pages of a book a day before my head "freezes" and i can't read anymore without comprehension,\n\nsomeone with an iq of 115 might go 20 pages in the same time with good comprension,\n\nthis assumse we read at the same speed,  assume the 115 person can read faster, as fast as me lets say,\n\nand now we both get froozen at about the same time lets say,\n\nthe person with the higher iq would retain more,\n\nso, their are variables here,  with how healthy, could the person in the same amount of time read 50 pages,\n\nagain, in the same time, there is a limit based on iq of how much comprehension, before the aforementioned, freeze\n\nthe freeze i get on the train to work and on the way home reading my books,\n\nlately it was a book called misquoteing jesus, about how the new testement has changed from its oldest copies,  not much of the meaning has changed, same jesus, death and reserection,\n\njust no snake handling in the oldest copies,\n\nfeel free to email me if you'd like instead of talking back and forth in all these silly questions\n\ndarwin_spartacus@yahoo.com\n\nyour friend
172939
Both require the use of sophisticated mental activities; they often require considerable analytical skills and data upon which to employ those skills.\n\nPrediction, however, is a bit on the chancy side: in trying to predict the outcome of an event, or the expected outcome of a cluster of events (say, sequential flips of a coin or rolls of a die or deals of a hand in poker) an intelligent predictor will offer a range of probable outcomes (eg.  you can expect an average of 50 heads per hundred coin flips, with about a 95% probability that it'll be between 40 and 60).  To infer is to begin at an observation, or with a defined set of assumptions, and to use logical rules to make your way to a conclusion that is logically inescapable, and as certainly true as your assumptions and as accurate as your chain of logic: no range of outcomes here!
740731
They are both intelligent, but in different ways. This is a values question, not an intellegence one. A person can be a genius in science and not have a clue about asthetics, or music or literarture. The same can be true of the arts student, who can be a creative genius, but finds math difficult. These areas of study use different parts of the brain, and most people are stronger in some areas than others. It is a disservice to tell bright children that they can be anything they want to be-it would be better to tell them to find out what they are best at, and give them the resources to run with it. It is a mistake to value science over the arts, or vice versa- we need them both.
1073345
The formal operational stage occurs in children aged 11 years plus, according to Piaget. I've got a psychology folder on it, email me if you want any details.
328880
It depends on what you call intelligence, and the environmental influences involved. If you have taken the tests before, you are more likely to do better--this doesnt necessarily mean you have gotten smarter. Also, a person might score really well on the test, but the test doesnt measure common sense or emotional maturity, which many could consider to be factors of intelligence also.