We all know that Iraq was behind 9/11, but what was its exact role?
368451
Wat do u mean wat was iraqs exact role in 9/11?\nThey hijacked sum planes and crashed them into the twin towers for example and other places. \nHow STUPID r u?
308972
First of all, you desperately need to learn to spell!\n\nSecondly 'Zacarias Moussaoui' is not a prime example of anything!\n\nhe has NOTHING to do with iraq, nor did iraq have ANYTHING to do with 9/11.  We are in iraq fighting because we have a greedy president who fights for his causes instead of what is right, instead of what the people want!\n\nIt has been proven time and time again that Bush lied about iraq to get us there!  He has a personal vendetta against them and vowed to get them before he was even elected!  He just needed an excuse to get there.  Now that he has the whole country afraid of terrorists after he (yes bush) planned 9/11 personally, he was able to get the excuse he needs to attack iraq.  There are no if ands or buts about it, iraq is an unjust war, we have brought havock to these poor innocent people and destroyed their lives!  Whats next?? Nuclear war in Iran??? if bush has his way then yes!
817225
The root cause? 9-11. It angered the most powerful nation in the world.
1021446
If you have any doubt about what happened, watch this video:\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801\nIt's called "Loose Change" and uses FACTS to prove the Bush government was behind or at least supported the 9/11 attacks.
1007819
Before US attacked Iraq i was sure it was a terrorist attack committed by AL-Quaeda.After they attacked Iraq i wasn't that sure.\nI saw too "loose changes" and i think u should better see "911 in plane site" it has stronger points.I don't know what to say about WTC but I'm convinced that the Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane and nothing will ever convinced me that it was.So yes I tend to believe that it was part a conspiracy.
576862
I don't think Iraq was about Bin Laden. Bush used terrorism and WMD's as an excuse to go. I think he knew he wanted Iraq before 9/11 ever happened. For the rest of your question, I agree that we should not have went into Iraq without authority from the U.N. But if there ever came a time when a genocide was going on and we needed to step in quick, screw waiting for the U.N.'s approval. Get in there and get it done. That will never ever happen as we have witnessed in the past....\n\nBlaird- As far as I know, Zarqawi was not a terrorist until after the invasion of Iraq, Someone fill me in..
903715
Nothing to do with 9-11. The Bushies wanted to add power to the presidency. The easiest way to do that is to go to war somewhere. The whole thing was decided even before Bush was elected. Drum up a war with Iraq so he could be a "War President," and thus get the extra juice in constitutional powers...and get an extra bump as an incumbent pres, since most all wartime presidents are reelected.
499273
9/11 has been in works since Operation Desert Shield. Even afterwards, while we flew Operation Northern and Southern Watch from Prince Sultan Airbase over Iraq, Bin Laden was fuming at the USA "infidels" being so close to Mecca. It was going to happen someday. GWB just drew the wrong card.
463014
By providing intelligence about impending attacks on Iraq (2003) to the Iraqis in order to help them fight against the US.  Wait a second, that wouldn't really be helpful, now would it?\n\nActually, they are cooperating by arresting suspects in Germany and trying them in court on terrorism charges.  They also continue to produce schnitzel and wurst in large quanitites in hopes that the terrorists will eat a lot and be too sleepy to do bad things.
1019763
It was right although we should have taken care of business when his father was president.  To kodadom92, President Bush never said Saddam was involved in 9/11.
1062676
The War in Iraq had zero (less than zero) connection to 9./11.\nSaddam Hussein had no connection with 9/11.\n\nThe war was/is about neo-cons with a vision of creating an American empire in the Middle East. The reason they have no exit strategy is they want to stay there forever. How else do you explain permanent military bases and a $600 million embassy in Baghdad?\n\nNone of the 9/11 terrorists was Iraqi. 15 were Saudis. If we really want to stop terrorism, we should crack down on Saudi Arabia -- but the royal family has financial ties with the Bushes.
42843
Here we go again\nWe are liberating Iraq, Trying to destroy terrorists (remember 9/11) and we thought they had WMD (they did at one time) but inteligence was wrong.  But whether they have them or not, it is a good thing to help the Iraqi people so they can experience the freedom we take for granted.
327290
9/11 was an inside job. (see link) Planned and implemented for this purpose: \nPetrodollar Warfare: Dollars, Euros and the Upcoming Iranian Oil Bourse (see link)
510875
according to everyone (exaggeration) on yahoo answers:  9/11 was caused by bush (after he created AIDS, Death, and the Devil) and then he also paid all the Terrorists to attack us in Iraq to keep this whole thing going.  Bush must spend his weekends pissing off the users of yahoo answers.\n\nhere are the reasons for the Iraq war (9/11 only made us worry more about those who were out to get us it was not a cause of the war):\n\nIraq broke a treaty so they were invaded \n\n(What treaty)\n\nthe one that ended the Gulf War\n\n(how did they break it)\n\nThey did not allow inspectors to look for banned weapons\n\n(Did they have banned weapons)\n\nYes, they had lots of banned missiles and a few WMDs but not the large stockpiles we were looking for.\n\n(why were we at war the first time)\n\nBecause they invaded Kuwait, end of story
108486
No. Iraq posed no military threat to the US.  They had nothing  to do with 9/11, but did happen to be sitting on the second largest oil reserves in the world.  This was a military adventure, a colonial war of choice - and one we are not going to win.
708556
the invasion of Iraq had nothing to do with demorcay, which was a front, or making the world a safer place, it had to do with a personal vendetta against Hussien by Bush, who tried and tried to tie Iraq to 9/11 but couldnt , who insitsted there were wmds, but couldnt find any, and anyone who said they did, please cite the source, it was also for oil! Meanwhile Bin Laddens boys continue to operate, why vbecause instead of pouring the amount of troops needed to kcik their butts in Afghanastan, we decided to invade Iraq! That alone should raise eyebrows, but it gets worse if you investigate just how the twin towers colsaapsed, when steel does not melt at the tmp that  the building got to, nor should it of free fell! SO someone hide something, and used Hussien as a shield so that they could accomplish their goal, which was $$ oil all powerful presidency, curtailing civil rights!
1099649
For everyone who says that Iraq had nothing to do with 9&#92;11. \nWe are fighting a war on terrorism and there is no single country that we are fighting. The terrorists are based and&#92; or supported  in many ways and operate independently of each other but they all have the same goal. Afghanistan was a host country, Iran supports them with money and equipment, Saddam paid $$ for suicide bombers and had training camps. Syria is also a sponsor. \nThe point is that while Saddam may not have been directly involved with 9&#92;11, he was a part of the bigger problem and had to be dealt with sooner or later. The terrorists are a network and need to be taken down wherever we find them.