Which holy book read in this world in its original language and without any changes since its revealation ?
361065
Quran. never have been changed.
417685
It is tiresome to read answers from people that have not actually read the Bible. All the prophecies of the Bible have been fulfilled and are 100% accurate. The only one left is the prophecy of judgement day...when Christ returns. The Bible is the ONLY religious book that is 100% accurate in prophecy, history and in every other way. If you want to learn more, feel free to e-mail me.
277737
I've never heard of the The Jesus bible before, where did you hear about it?
400491
Peace on you...Muslims have something that offers the most clear proof of all - The Holy Quran. There is no other book like it anywhere on earth. It is absolutely perfect in the Arabic language. It has no mistakes in grammar, meanings or context. The scientific evidences are well known around the entire world, even amongst non-Muslim scholars. Predictions in the Quran have come true; and its teachings are clearly for all people, all places and all times. No one has been able to produce a book like it, nor ten chapters like it, nor even one chapter like it. It was memorized by thousands of people during the lifetime of Muhammad, peace be upon him, and then this memorization was passed down from teacher to student for generation after generation, from mouth to ear and from one nation to another. Today every single Muslim has memorized some part of the Quran in the original Arabic language that it was revealed in over 1,400 years ago, even though most of them are not Arabs. There are over nine million (9,000,000) Muslims living on the earth today who have totally memorized the entire Quran, word for word, and can recite the entire Quran, in Arabic just as Muhammad, peace be upon him, did 14 centuries ago. May Allah bless us.
867366
The Quran was revealed in Arabic and still exists in its original form.
149822
First what is a Holy book and what makes it Holy? Can mankind just say a book is holy and that is it? Is that national law, international, universal law, or is it some greater law of a greater area greater than the universe? \n\nDon't mind me I am always confused for I at times don't have any idea what is really being considered but I don't want to offend anyone. Maybe I should just stand by so others will think I am wise but us stupid people do like to show it and ask questions to affirm it.\n\nI may be wrong but I think that a Holy book is holy cause one says or thinks its Holy. I have two books that I want to use as a comparison. One is a Holy bible cause the word Holy is printed on the cover and the other is not cause the word holy is not printed there. As far as contents both have almost identical words and do cause the same thoughts to come to mind when I read them one at a time or compare them side by side. Of course it ain't over till its orer so I will just wait. Maybe that Holy book will eat up that other book or make that other book just disappear - who knows. It seems all things do in their time occur and Mr Murphy says if it can it will. So I will be patient.\n\nI do respect another who wants to have a Holy Book - that is his choice and I only ask him to respect my position of not doing so and I will respect his position of his choice. Please no war and let us do reason together rather than fight insisting one or the other is wrong or right. Does it really matter anyway?\n\nReally is it the fact the book is considered Holy or is it in the fact of how one does radiate the effect of the book to others? Is it not in the glow of a lamp that does provide the light so one can know the lamp is turned on and of value or not of value for those who want to stay in the dark.  Again I am just making comments and might be wrong again. so just take it as a value if such is to you. If not just ignore it like most other things that do exist all around to be used or atleast observed.\n\nI personally do see a light far away if I am in the dark but in the light some times I have a hard time seeing for sure if the light is on or not. Yes I do wear glasses so maybe that is the reason.\n\nAll of this is to say in my opinion that the word Holy is not the issue or fact. It is how others relate relative to one another whether considered brothers.\n, created, evolved, christian, muslim, or from another named or unnamed division or classification. Why not learn to reason together and let each follow his own Holy Book or not holy book and try to understnd it takes all the unique snow flakes to make a snowman. Ha Ha but a little heat from the sun will make him a puddle of water so the grass can grow after the cold if such was or is on schedule by the One in control if in fact one does accept there is one in control.\n\nIn conclusion In my opinion its not the book that is hard to understand and religion will never be understood. Its in the words the books put on display and the ways they are used that seems to present this hard to understand factor. A baby is very self-centered at birth and that is what the book called the bible says. Likewise all things will pass away and that is what the bible says as I read it. See its simple without those big big words like religion, spiritual, belief, position, Holy, and all that complicated stuff. Learn to be in a manner like a baby knowing if it does seek and seek it will in one way or another get a return. [note I did not say be self-cantered or exactly like a baby] So keep it simple and one will find the simple stuff in understanding. Don't take the simple and twist it all up in a complicated never to be understood package and for a new religion. Seems there is enough of that and enough Holy Books.
300429
It is not. Back then, each copy of the Bible had to be handwritten when they were reproduced. This means the scribes had free will to add/change anything they wanted. Also the Bible was translated from Greek and Hebrew to English. So its changed a lot, because there are no originals in existence. KJV went through the hands of countless scribes before being translated.  Even the dead sea scrolls are not the originals, just really old, close to original copies. And no, they're not in English
236124
The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures. It is easy to understand because it is in today's language. And it is properly translated from the original scrolls.\nvisit www.watchtower.org.
62059
http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/\n\nI like how you said "Now that there are different versions of the book." Welcome to the 16th century.
116790
I wish to read it but only the original bible not the translations. I like to read each and actual words as sent by God not by humans.
1130826
In an odd way, sweet_shy is right.  Sure, there are translation errors and parts of it may have been added or deleted, but it's still God's work.  It was divinely inspired; the only part that really matters is the message, and do you really think that he would let his message be corrupted?  The rest is just fluff to make it readable.  Now having read the New Testament, I find that what I read is entirely in line with my knowledge of God.  I think the message comes through just fine and there are no errors in it despite whatever stages the actual text has gone through.
790981
+ The Catholic Bible +\n\nThe New Testament canon of the Catholic Bible and the Protestant Bible are the same.\n\nThe difference in the Old Testaments actually goes back to the time before and during Christ’s life. At this time, there was no official Jewish canon of scripture.\n\nThe Jews in Egypt translated their choices of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek in the second century before Christ. This translation, called the Septuagint, had wide use in the Roman world because most Jews lived far from Palestine in Greek cities. Many of these Jews spoke only Greek.\n\nThe early Christian Church was born into this world. The Church, with its bilingual Jews and more and more Greek-speaking Gentiles, used the books of the Septuagint as its Bible. Remember the early Christians were just writing the documents what would become the New Testament.\n\nAfter the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem, with increasing persecution from the Romans and competition from the fledgling Christian Church, the Jewish leaders came together and declared its official canon of Scripture, eliminating seven books from the Septuagint. \n\nThe books removed were Tobit, Judith, 1 Maccabees, 2 Maccabees, Wisdom (of Solomon), Sirach, and Baruch. Parts of existing books were also removed including Psalm 151 (from Psalms), parts of the Book of Esther, Susanna (from Daniel as chapter 13), and Bel and the Dragon (from Daniel as chapter 14).\n\nThe Christian Church did not follow suit but kept all the books in the Septuagint.\n\n1500 years later, Protestants decided to change its Old Testament from the Catholic canon to the Jewish canon. The books they dropped are sometimes called the Apocrypha.\n\nHere is a Catholic Bible website: http://www.nccbuscc.org/nab/bible/\n\n+ The First Pope +\n\nJesus said to him in reply, "Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my heavenly Father. And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven." (Matthew 16:17-19)\n\nThe Catholic Church believes the Lord made Simon alone, whom he named Peter, the "rock" of his Church. He gave him the keys of his Church and instituted him shepherd of the whole flock.\n\nThe Pope is the senior pastor of 1.1 billion Catholics, the direct successor of Simon Peter.\n\nWith love in Christ.
1090013
It's absurd to believe that ANYTHING passed down for hundreds of years, and translated into hundreds of languages could be EXACTLY the way it was in it's original form. Not to mention that there are now different versions of the bible, King James Version, etc. \n\nLike now with all the hype over the Da Vinci code, people should ask questions and understand the origin of the religion that they believe so deeply in instead of just following it blindly.
110952
This was the value of the Dead sea scrolls.  It gave scholars a chance to see what had changed in time since they were written and modern day editions.  The surprising thing was that there was a remarkable similarlity.\n\nHave you heard the saying, every translator is a liar?  This is because language changes with the culture.  A word like gay has has had its meaning changed dramatically over the last fifty years.\nUnless scholars change the words of scripture to reflect current usage, then the meaning will be lost.  So to stay authentic, the bible translations must change.
944296
On Biblegateway.com there are 69 translations of the Holy Bible.\n\nThey do not include the JW version of the Bible.\n\nMormons I know read the King James Version of the Bible, however the Mormon writings take precidence if they conflict with it.\n\nRoman Catholics read the King Jaes Version of the Bible, however the edicts of the Pope and other Papal writings take precidence if they conflict with it.\n\nMary Baker Eddy made up her own version of the Bible.\n\nThere are others as well.
621813
No to your added question.  It is the only one that has stood the test of time and remains loyal to the meanings of what has always been accepted as God's inspired word.  newer versions often leave out or add to which alters the meaning drastically - my personal opionion has always been that satan's greatest division for christians was to confuse their bible so they couldn't even quote it the same anymore.
560917
Of course, we believed that the original Bible that given by God to Moses had already vanished in this world but if it can be found, we cannot follow what lies inside it because the born of Quran executed other Holy Books including Bible.\nWhy we should believed to a book that have been spoiled by reckless people, they manipulate everything, the changed every contents ? We could not consider Bible as the Holy Book anymore... Too many version of Bible and we don't know which one is the right ones !.