IF BUSH SAID MASSACHUSSETTS HAD WMD WOULD HlS CONSTITUENTS BACK HIM?
369059
Matter a fact I am pretty sure the U.S.Navy has an installation there anyway. Mass could fight back! There are several submarines at port there.
1088301
Great question.  I would love to see Murtha, Sheehan, Moore, and even John Kerry holding hands in front of a mosque in a means of protest.  See how they feel when they are attacked by a suicide bomber.  These liberals need to decide what they stand for (instead of just anti-Bush) before they start bashing our troops and other military leaders.  They might be worth listening to if they ever had any good points to make.
351441
I have never met PRESIDENT Bush, so I can't say whether I like him or not.  I'm not intellectually challenged or DEFICIENT (that's the correct spelling, answerman), and actually, I'm not even a Republican.\nHowever, I don't think many people could have led our country better the last six years, except maybe me, lol.  J/K.  I do wish we could raise FDR from the dead though, he would have been awesome right about now!  And, oh yeah, he was a Democrat, not that it matters...\nSo here's why I approve of PRESIDENT Bush as President:\nHe hasn't defended himself on Hurricane Katrina.  Everyone wants to blame him, but really, Louisiana is NOT the only state that was heavily damaged by the hurricane.  What about Mississippi?  Oh, that's right, their STATE government took care of them...and they asked for federal aid immediately.  In New Orleans, it was announced by the mayor, the senator, and the governor that they did not need federal aid the day after the hurricane.  Yet after all hell broke loose, the National Guard was sent in...and quickly.\nThe wire-tapping was a great idea.  Too bad the media got ahold of it.  Why was it a great idea?  Because it allowed the government to listen in on calls placed from known Al Qaida operatives to the US.  They were NOT listening in on Joe Schmoe telling his best friend how much p***y he got the other night, or Jane Doe telling her sister how much pot she smoked.  So, nice job media, ruining that one.  \nThe so-called "leak", which was in fact the disclosure of DECLASSIFIED information.  The CIA agent that was "outed" hadn't been a covert agent for over five years.  Yet President Bush isn't defending himself on that either.\nHe's been accused of "lying" about the WMD's, and yet hasn't defended himself.  I really wish people would get over that one, because no matter how many times they're told that the Democrats "lied", and the soldiers over there (and who were there in the last three years) that have found evidence that there HAD been WMD's also "lied"...they won't listen.\nI could say much more on how he's NOT a bad president, but I'm not going to waste my time.  If some of these people REALLY wanted to know, they would watch FahrenHYPE 9/11 (which disproves much of Michael Moore's lovely\n"documentary"), stop watching Loose Change, and maybe take a look at truthorfiction.com, snopes.com, popularmechanics.com (and search for the story about debunking the 9/11 conspiracy myths), or www.strategypage.com (and search for the story on the War in Iraq).\nHere's what I like about President Bush:\nHe's true to his word, especially away from the cameras.  I've heard many stories about how he shows his respect for our Armed Forces members, has taken the time to pray with someone just because they asked him, given hugs and comfort to those who have lost loved ones in 9/11 and the War...\nOverall, he shows his integrity in private.  That's what matters most to me.  I couldn't care less about how well he speaks (or doesn't, as we all know is true), because that's his public face.\nI like the fact that he illegalized partial-birth abortion within his first few months in office, yet has left abortion alone other than that, even though he feels it's wrong.\nI love the fact that he doesn't listen to the war protesters, and instead listens to the soldiers on the ground.  Most of them say we CAN'T pull out...and we'd better not.  Also, many of them have said that even though they were injured, they would go again and again.  I saw that on, if I remember correctly, CBS news, which, as most conservatives know, leans to the left.  I've also talked to many soldiers myself, and most of them have told me the same thing.\nMost people that have met him say he's not the "bumbling idiot" many think he is.  He's actually ver
36223
I will not apologise.  He said there were WMD's based on the fact that he knew where they would be. It's been two years so if he does find them it's more likely that the US planted them there!  Bush has lost all credibility on Iraq.
222318
Its not an accepted fact.  If you notice 90% of the Democrats who were screaming about "No WMDs in Iraq" have all but shut up.\nIts because evidence has come out that Iraq did indeed have working WMDs and that those working WMDs were sent to Syria, as well as other places.\nNow the only ones who cannot accept the fact that Iraq had WMDs are the liberal sheep who haven't heard any different from their leaders.\nBut as I stated above they are not talking, they don't want to show their ignorance, and stupidity, and if someone doesn't talk about something for a while, eventually everyone forgets about it...\nThe problem is that the liberal sheep are still screaming that there were no WMDs, and keeping that fire burning, which will eventually force the democratic leaders to fess up and say, "Ok there were WMDs.  They have been shipped to Syria.  But Bush is still to blame for every social and moral wrong that you can think of."
916009
I don't know of a Jon Carry. However, any aspirations John Kerry had in becoming our next president was blown away by his idiotic remarks about our troops. The liberals in Massachusetts may keep re-electing him ( after all, they keep re-electing a murderer ), but he is toast as far as any other political office.
589977
They wouldn't. They would give some bullshit lip service speech about the need to protect America, then would have given money and aid to the Taliban as a peace bribe, since the liberal worldview clearly states that we are solely responsible for all the world's suffering, all the while trying to tune out the terrorists laughter at their pansy-assed response to the murder of thousands of our citizens.
806699
Despite the apparent gains by the Democrats, all support for Bush has not vanished. First of all, he still has a good number of Republicans in his corner. Also, some of the gains made by the Democrats were from Conservative Democrats like Lieberman, Casey. Webb, and Tester. When it comes to certain issues, like the war on terror, don't count Bush out as the Republicans along with the conservative Democrats still may be able to prevent the Liberals from waving the white flag and retreat from Iraq, leaving victory to the terrorists.
1168337
I don't see how anyone who knows the facts surrounding the Iraq war and can think clearly could possibly support him. Do the pro-Bush people realize that Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11? Being aware of pertinent facts like that might help you think more clearly about President Bush. \n\nThe issue is not about supporting the troops. The issue is whether the foreign policy is right. I believe it is not and that it is appropriate and necessary to acknowledge that fact. I think that the present state of affairs speaks for itself - the Bush administration is arrogant and incompetent. \n\nAnd folks, when you talk about freedom of oppressed people, that was not the reason we started this, remember - it was about weapons of mass destruction and terrorism.
1051157
First nothing can convince me,even if US finds WMD in Iraq ,that Saddam Hussein had them.If it was so they would have found it a long time ago.\nBush should be preoccupied by the situation in US and not spending money on wars,when those money are needed by the US citizens.\nIsrael still refuses to sign the nuclear nonproliferation treaty.Anything Israel does or say it's "self defense",while the Palestinians defending themselves are terrorists.And anyone who says anything bad about Israel is definitely anti semite,if if he's right.Bush keep supporting Israel 'cos they are the only ally in Middle East.It seems ,in mr Bush opinion that anything that it's Arab it's terrorist.
994186
That's easy.  Back when we were all discussing why Saddam needed his ass kicked, the libs kneejerked their way into a corner.  They hate(d) Bush SOOOO bad, they couldn't allow themselves to be seen agreeing with him, so the importance of the WMDs had to be minimized.  Now, any time a report comes out that demonstrates Iraq had WMD's, the lib press and politicians will talk about anything BUT that report.\n\nThe libs aren't completely stupid (ok, they are, but that's another topic) and they realize that to admit they were wrong will not only remove their mainstream base, but they will also loose face with the extreme lefties.  Not a good thing with elections coming up, so all they have left to do is scream about bringing the troops home, blah blah blah to divert attention from the real issues.
537394
of Course ! that will be one of US hiding reason after WMD for invade Iran. Bush will take that option coz Iran is a threat for economic and politic of US.especially for rhe democracy program in middle east.
212305
Bill Clinton answered that when he basically did nothing about the attack on the USS Cole. Liberals hate anything military (more or less)
594883
As much as I hate to say this but most of what he said was right.  Bush is crazy if he thinks the USA is going to be the only people with WMD's.  Iran is making nuclear warheads too.
524366
You put your question very well.\nYes he did have WMDs. just not found thanks to the delay in Attacking Iraq.\nThe people of Iraq did Want Rid of him. And MOST don't want him back.\nSaddam did Have links with Terrorists. The party he led were all Terrorists. I would just wonder how any other President would have handled the Pressure that was thrown at him the way 9/11 was on President Bush. Maybe if some of the ones on this site sent out good Vibes rather than the Bad ones. Might just make the Terrorists think twice. Before they act. When the American People Are United, The Worlds Terrorists Faltered. this my opinion as None American.\n\ng who or what gives you the right to call someone else Stupid Just because they have a different Point than yours.\nFucking typical rhetoric from a sheep herder.
1002110
Iraq was never about WMD.\n\nOur government knew this beforehand and when the people we sent to investigate whether or not they were trying to get yellow cake uranium got back and reported in that there was no evidence to suggest that Saddam was trying to obtain the uranium. This report was conveniently ignored and when the report went public, less than a week later the white house leaked the identity of the wife of the investigator, CIA operative Valory Plame ruining here career.\n\nBush is not a Conservative he is a Neo Conservative.\n\nDo not confuse the two they are vastly different. Neo Conservatives (neocon) attack and attempt to discredit anyone who spreads truth that undermines the misinformation they are trying to spread. They label anyone who questions their motives as Liberal or anti-American. Neocons do not care about anything that does not help further their own financial interests or keep neocons in power. But all the while they must maintain the image that they are just a good christian conservative looking out for you.\n\nTherefore the only logical reason that we invaded in the first place is to disrupt the supply of oil in order to drive up the price. If you do a little homework, the majority of both Bush and Chaney's assets are in oil. They are getting rich on the blood of our soldiers people.\n\nWake up people, if your not appalled, your not paying attention!
625478
It is possible to support the "President" and Not support bush the man.\nIn a way we all support the President of the United States\n(except those extreme left wing nut jobs who even Liberals like myself hate)\nIts g. bush the man who needs to be called to task. bush failed his country and as good Americans it is our duty to point this out.