Is it possible for us to see the outer most part of the universe????
366937
Maybe in a few millon years... so want to go visit it with me??
220589
For all we know there is nothing "outside" the universe, so obviously no way to look "at" it from any "outside". That way there is no way to compare the size of it, why you could probably say, the universe is infinitely small. There is a mathematical smallest size, called the Planck-Size. That is just where space ends to be space, so there is no inside. As simple as that. You don't need to invent any kind of god to think about those things.
1022362
Off course scienists investigate this. Our galaxy is pretty flat around where we are - only 3,000 light years wide. It gets thicker then that in the center -16,000 light years but that's still pretty thin compare to it's length - about 100,000 light years across. "above" and "below" us are other stars, possibly with other planets. Basically the same things that are "in front" and "behind" us across the length of the galactic disk. \nOn a very dark night you'll be able to see a bright band across the night sky - that's the Milky Way. You'll then be looking towards the galactic center. The pictures we recive from satelites and telescope come from different directions.\nAs for a 3D model of the universe there is such a project in progress but it deals with objects on a much larger scale - galaxy clusters, superclusters, walls and fillaments.
721496
Well, think about your question... What's on the other side of every other border you know?  Another room, another zone, another country, another place of some kind.  Borders are edges, but they're edges that divide things.  Although it's kind of cool to think "what if there's a border to space!" then you've also got to think "so what's on the other side of the border - and does THAT place go on forever, or maybe it has a border, too."  And what's on the other side of that border?  So space, in some form, is going to go on and on and on. \n We can see almost 15 billion light years with some of our most powerful telescopes, and in all that huge distance there is absolutely nothing that looks like a border - it all looks infinite. Some scientists say maybe space is curved - but the curvature they're talking about is a curve with no border.  Wierd, eh?  That's why I like science - there are some very strange ideas turn out to be true.
408049
Current estimates for the size of the universe are that it is so large that light from some parts of it that has been traveling towards us since the moment of the Big Bang still hasn't had enough time to reach us.  Furthermore, the universe is expanding rapidly enough that such light will NEVER reach us.  Therefore, no matter how advanced our telescopes become, humans will never be able to see the most remote reaches of space.
264754
Think of the universe as a giant bubble. Outside the bubble is nothing. nothing exists. no space. no time. Even though there is an edge to the universe, you cant reach it. If you started at the earth and went in a straight line. you would eventually come back to the earth. Also, we are not the only universe. there are other bubles. too. they are in the same nothing as ours. But you could not travel to other universes.
1009683
Hey I don't wonder about space rather its quite a bit interesting to wander in the space.....Its known journey began from Big Bang.....Our Universe is just 156 billion light years wide.....so keep wandering beforing it comes to an end.....
347537
I have given an answer to this elsewhere, but I will repeat it here.\n\nAssuming that by the question you ask, you are essentially asking what is beyond the edge of our Universe, the answer to which will change depending on whether we live in a flat, open or closed Universe.\n\nOne way to try to understand it is to throw away a dimension, and imagine being a 2 dimensional being living on a sheet of paper. Sort of like a cartoon that you drew. To them, the Universe they occupy consists of only the paper itself. There is only up/down, left/right, there is no in and out of the paper for them, it may exist for us observing them, but they can't see us, and they are not aware of this extra dimension. Living on this sheet of paper, whilst flat on the desk there is quite obviously an edge beyond which to them, is nothingness...... hmmmm\n\nOk, so now imagine that they aren't living on a flat piece of paper but on the surface of a sphere (say of a baloon for example). The inside and outside of the sphere is a dimension inaccessible to them. Therefore, there are now NO edges to their universe. If they travelled upwards from their position (NOT leaving the sphere), then they would eventually come back to where they started. If you then started to inflate the baloon, it would expand, but to the "cartoon" people, all they will experience is seeing their surroundings expand. To them, their universe is expanding into another dimension, that they cannot see, and that it inaccessible to them.\n\nThis in a way, but with one dimension less, could be what is happening to our Universe. There may be no physical edge that we can ever come across, but it could be expanding into another dimension. \n\n\nOn the other hand, if you are asking if the Universe will, one day, simply cease to exist .... then that is a completely different answer!!!!\n\nThe Universe is expanding - into what, could be another dimension - and the amount of matter in the Universe will determine whether or not this expansion will stop and reverse, or whether it will carry on for eternity!  As it happens there is evidence to suggest that the expansion of the Universe is actually accelerating, and so the end of the Universe will be a very dismal cold place.  There will be no stars left giving out light, the heat of the Universe will be stretched out over infinity!  It will be the death of the Universe.\n\nIf there was enough matter in the Universe then the gravitational pull of all the matter could force the Universe to start to collapse back in on itself. Eventually it would all come together in one place in what would be called "The Big Crunch" - and this would be the end of the Universe as we know it.
1139401
Due to atmospheric interference, it would not be possible to see any mad made object left on the moon from a telescope on the surface of Earth.\nHowever, there is a very powerful, Earth orbiting, telescope which is free from atmospheric distortions…the Hubble space telescope.  However, even this telescope, as powerful as it is, could not possibly see the flag left on the moon.\n\nUsing a little math and common sense, it would not nearly be possible to see the flag on the moon with the Hubble space telescope.\n\nFirst, let’s get some basic facts straight.\nThe Diameter of the Hubble telescope is 2.4 meters and the distance from the Earth to the moon (on average) is about 3.84 E8 meters.\n\nPretty much the only thing limiting what Hubble can and cannot resolve is diffraction through a circular aperture (i.e. how light waves interact with each other when they get to Hubble's mirror.\nThe minimum angle which a circular aperture can resolve is given by the formula,\nTheta_min = 1.22 Lambda / D\nwhere Theta min is the minimum angle, Lambda is the wavelength of light we are using, and D is the diameter of the opening.\n\nIf we assume we are using light at 500 nm (roughly the middle of the visible spectrum) and we know that Hubble's diameter is 2.4 meters, we can find the minimum angle to be,\nTheta_min = 2.54 E-7 radians.\nThis is quite a small angle by Earthly standards, but will it compare to the angle to the flag on the moon?...we'll see.\n\nHere is where I have to make an assumption, but it is a very reasonable assumption and one that will assure us that out answer is correct. Watching the moon landing videos, one can see that the astronauts placed a moderately sized flag on a pole on the moon. Although I don’t know the exact dimensions of the flag, I can assure you, it was definitely no bigger than 10 ft. But for the sake of argument and to make the numbers easier, let’s assume it was 10 feet (~3 meters).\nIf the distance between the flag and Hubble is the same (about) as the distance from the Earth to the moon, then we can calculate the angle between the top of the flag and the bottom of the flag pole as seen by Hubble orbiting Earth. The angle comes out to be about, 7.81 E-9 radians, about 30 times SMALLER than the absolute minimum angle Hubble can resolve...and this is if we assume that the flag is 10 ft, which it obviously is smaller than that in reality.\n\nPlus, Hubble was specifically designed to look at VERY distant object. Although the moon is far away, it might as well be right next to us compared to the stars/galaxies/.. Hubble is supposed to be looking at. Therefore, I don’t know exactly how it will respond looking at such a close and bright object.\n\nOne this is sure through, you could not see the flag, even with one of the best telescopes ever built operating perfectly under ideal conditions using visible light.
210647
What lies beyond the edge of the universe is matter that is receding at a speed greater than that of light relative to us. Check out the Begy atomic model, It proposes that the big bang has no beggining and no end and is an ongoing process. Belief in God is possible, comprehension of God is not.
1023489
No.  But we see only the side that faces earth.\n\nHere's a good diagram that explains it better than I can...\n\n\nhttp://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/the_universe/uts/moon2.html
436621
yeah, i guess it could wrack almost anyone's brain.  spacetime is not infinite.  it is finite yet has no edge.  it may be something like the two dimensional surface of a sphere.  nothing inside or outside the sphere exists for the surface.  nothing exists outside the universe or before the universe.  i have something else for you to think about.  the universe is 13.7 billion years old, yet we can observe parts of the universe that are about 46 billion lightyears away.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_bang\nhttp://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html\nhttp://www.sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=0009F0CA-C523-1213-852383414B7F0147
159281
Take into consideration the billions of stars in this galaxy. Then take into consideration the billions of galaxies in the local cluster. Then take into consideration the billions of clusters in the local supercluster. Then take into consideration the billions of superclusters in the local segment of the wall. Then take into consideration the billions of segments in the Great Wall. Then take into consideration the billions of walls in the Universe. It's even possible there's more than one universe! \n\nWhat do you believe? I think there is life out there. But are they sentient and advanced? Maybe. Maybe not.
880652
the universe WAS a singularity (everything packed into an tiny tiny tiny space) before the big bang. So, i guess, technically, you  can go see the consequence of a singularity by opening your eyes. but see one as a singularity, i have no idea, sorry.
410657
Surely it's impossible to travel BEYOND the stars. Given that our universe is infinite, as we know it, and that the nearest star to us is too far for us to travel to now, I cannot forsee anyone EVER travelling TO a star, let alone BEYOND the stars.\n\nThat said, I do believe that there is other intelligent life out there. We would be arrogant to believe otherwise!
725849
Sure, it's possible. But you won't see any artifacts there. Even the largest telescope on earth does not have the resolution to see a 10 meter spacecraft from a distance of 350,000 km.\n\nAn object that size at that distance subtends an arc of .005 arcseconds. Both Hubble and Keck (the best telescopes on or near earth) have a resolution limit of about .05 arcseconds.
423943
The universe is basically everything.  The visible universe is the part of the universe that is known to us, it is the farthest we can see and, hence, the farthest we can study.  There may be more beyond this but it is kind of silly for us to worry much about it at this point because it is beyond our reach.\n\nVacuum (I'm assuming that's what you were typing), is supposed to be the complete lack of matter.  If you say that there is a vacuum inside a box then there should be no atoms inside the box.  We say that space is a vacuum but this is really a generalization.  Space is not completely empty but things thin-out the further you get away from the Earth, our sun, our galaxy...\n\nI'm not sure how one creates a real vacuum.  No one really knows how our universe came into existence but we have a very good guess that it started with the Big Bang.  There is some evidence to support this.\n\nHere are two websites that describe it better than I could if you are interested.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang\n\nhttp://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/universe/b_bang.html