how does carbon sequestration make an application of the coase theorem?
371933
Pardon me for pointing this out, but your question belongs in Higher Education and not in Special Education. I'm sorry I do not know the answer to your question. When I entered those words into yahoo's search engine, the following site popped up.
704477
CO is not a powerful enough reducing agent to reduce CaO.\nPerhaps the questioner meant carbon dioxide?\nIn which case the equilibrium is simple:\n\nCaO + CO2 <-----> CaCO3
986283
I'm not going to do you're homework for you and I suggest that if you can't answer this you may want to consider dropping your econ class or getting some special help.  In most cases Marginal Cost = Supply for a given firm.  You're market clearing point will be Supply = Demand (for a competitive firm).  You can use that information to solve the rest.
795154
2CO(g) + O2(g) --> 2CO2(g)
519976
Take a look at this  www.classco.com/excieo/news/PEIPSM031009.PDF
778995
Yes!\n\nI'll assume by oxygen you mean breathable air (witch contains nitrogen, oxygen, co2, helium, and other gases).  Your teacher is trying to show you that everything is scarce under certain conditions.  The variable in this example is pollution.  \n\nThere is a certain demand for fresh air in large cities.  There is a limited supply.  Personal property (cars, trucks, factories) create negative externalities (pollution).  This pollution makes fresh air scarcer.  The more cars, the more pollution.  Assuming there is NO government intervention pollution would be so bad nobody could go outside.  Even Mexico City has certain limitations on pollution because it is getting so bad.  This externality is offset by the government imposing taxes to gas.  Regulations for emitions on cars, pollution licenses for businesses.  \n\nThe concept is very economic
929873
lol \n\nu would have to figure out, at least, how much CO2 a "common" rainforest tree can remove as they would remove the most CO2 not saying that other foliage would be insignificant. then figure out spacing between those trees. i think from that point you can figure out just how many square meters of rainforest it would take to remove a ton of CO2. \n\nthen, figure out a percent at which the surrounding foliage would assist in the removal of CO2. shrink the total area by that percent to get a more realistic size.
810375
B.  C4 plants have a unique molecule into which CO2 is incorporated.  Then the unique molecule will release the CO2 when it is trasported to it neighbor cell.
598151
A) carbon burning in air\nAll the other choices demonstrate physical changes.
30481
Carbon -- can't live without it!
1056892
Its WISELY getting the most for the least.  Making use of limited resources to fulfill unlimited wants.  As my ECO 251 instructor put it--"getting oodles of utils"!
274304
Here's a good source of info:\nhttp://ece-www.colorado.edu/~kuester/Coax/connchart.htm
782814
1) Bring all carbon dioxide producing systems under proper control. Regulate the carbon dioxide generation by all such systems so as to curb fanciful use of such systems, and allow only the necessary.\n\nThe United Nations can impose limits of total CO2 release by all systems in a country that can be allowed, can creat a technologically competent controlling and governing apparatus\nfor this.\n\n2) War footing plantation drives. Cover the entire globe with trees and forests. Not with any kind of green shrub,that is handy,  but botanically designed forests with eco-balance. It is not difficult., if all the Govennemts give this action a serious priority. And also, not so expensive as it may look, if the various populaces over the globe accept it with heart.\n\nForests are commercially exploitable systems. Let big investers cultivate forests on all the waste lands of all the Governments and be allowed to ripe the harvests in future.\n\nAll religions have given importance to trees. Design psychological projects of making all religious leaders to highlight and give emphasis to all the rituals related to trees.\n\nRedefine uses of lands and make suitable legislations. I will put it roughly in  this way. " Any piece of land which is not already used for dwelling, agriculture, industry, water reserves or throughfare, and is not privately owned, is open for any individual to plant trees and ripe the harvests thereof."\n\n3) Concentrate more on developing technology for mass scrubbing of CO2.  Both mega systems and micro systems.
960492
Carbon dioxide is food for plants, more CO2, more assimilation.
1165612
The equipartition theorem says that the energy will be distributed evenly among all the modes available.\n\nFor Ar, the only place to put in energy is in translational motion, because there can be no vibrations w/ just one atom, and rotation of an atom doesn't store energy either (actually it's more like an electronic transition, but that's another story.  Just approximate an atom as a geometric point, and there is no energy in rotation.)\n\nFor CCl4, the energy can be distributed among vibrations and rotations of the molecule, as well as the translation of the molecule.  The total number of modes =3A, where A is the number of atoms.  For CCl4, 5 atoms means 15 modes (3 translation which are equivalent, 3 rotation which happen to be equivalent b/c of the symmetry of CCl4 assuming all the same Cl isotope, and 9 vibration).\n\nNow, back to the equipartion theorem and temperature.  Temp is a meausre of the average translational energy.  So, the translational energy of Ar and CCl4 will be the same at a given temperature (the average velocity of the CCl4 will be less b/c it's heaver) But to get there, you had to put in more energy into the CCl4, b/c other modes took energy along the way.
810288
these links might help:\n\nhttp://zahry.usm.my/CAI_CBL/15-42426/_main/assign3/312fou.htm\n\n\nhttp://environment.uwe.ac.uk/video/cd_hdef/topic%20foundations/section2.htm
1101762
Chemistry is constantly evolving... an example of some recent developments is using carbon nanotubes (fullerenes) to act as supports for catalysts. This would increase industrial catalysts for refineries by a theoretical amount such as 10,000 times more efficient.\nWhomever can get this working would be a billionaire over night.\n\nThis work is still being done and is only a theory that is 2 years old.