The Amorous Bugs (a logic challenge)?
372422
If each bug moves towards its target at constant rate r inches per second, then I think "infinitesimally speaking" because each target is moving at right angles to the direction of its seeker that the distance between seeker and target will lessen at the same constant rate of r inches per second.\n\nThus it will take 10 inches / (r inches per second) = 10/r seconds until all four meet in the center, during which time each will have traveled 10/r * r = 10 inches.
281432
This is a paradox!! Cannot be resolved. It is just like saying that "This sentence hass 3 misttakd."
81655
Yes:  theory of computational systems.
780025
x ≤ 5\n\n-- - - - - - -s-
511341
I'm not sure if I understood correctly but check out the pigeonhole principle
680148
The greatest mystery here is "WHAT IS THE PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED?"\n\nIf a knowledge of the 'knapsack' problem is required, please copy it here for all to ponder............
246532
Read 'The Unity of Philosophical Experience' by Etienne Gilson.  He ably dismantles this kind of Cartesian nonsense in the relevant section.
400012
a programmer wont waste his/her time here!\nso there is no one to answer you ;)
573927
single replacement, double replacement, decomposition, synthesis
491741
you arguments are good, however i swear that proving FLT isn't so easy . the best will that you yourself prove FLT in a single page checking out every arguments.\nafter all it took 350 yrs to find a proof !!\nkeep on trying ,good luck.
217153
While it may appear to you that since life dows exist which in itself is a mystery, mankind relies upon logic. When he cannot reason out the answers, determain, a formula to exctact and solve questions, discover a sep by step sequince he is then lost. When we are confused by controversy and we cannot find a conventional means to resolve our questions we become lost and will not accept what is put before us.
263164
I won 10 points!\n\nThis is pretty easy. Try to stump me with harder ones.
280454
agreement\n\nfor more antonyms, checkout:\nhttp://thesaurus.reference.com/search?q=contradiction
189806
Irrational persistent actions
393251
I'd dump it into a compiler and do it for you but you left too much out.  Impossible to return a syntax error free version without the whole program.\n\nAnyways, I get paid for this.  How many points is this worth?  ...to do someone's homework for him?  Or maybe he's doing contract work!  He's getting $70 and hour to let us do it for him!
40843
What a pity that you cannot answer your own question! I'm getting curious...\n\nIt seems to be a question in pure logics rather than arithmetics: as you don't know me you cannot give me any apple (first proposition: False) \nBut canaries don't have teeth (second proposition: false)\n\nSo the implication is true... \n\nOtherwise, being the postulate contradictory, any proposition can be logically proven: including "lower than 3 and higher than 5"\n\nI'm giving numbers?
802797
Answering questions in the reverse order of how they are asked is imminently logical and fascinating. The derivation of the phrase " lickity split" is a matter of contention unlikely to be resolved any time soon but I did enjoy the debate. I hope it's over.