Why do USA government always resist Neuclear Reactor of Iran ?
359647
That's a misconception.  As much as I dislike the current US government, I must say that they do not resist nuclear power in Iran.  They, along with most other democratic governments, do not approve of the type of reactors that Iran is building.  \n\nIran is developing "breeder" reactors and  making enriched uranium, whose only "reasonable" application is weaponry.  If Iran were truly interested in nuclear reactors for domestic power there are a number of different designs that are cheaper and more efficient, and don't create weapons.
56062
Be real.  It's not just the US concerned about it, it's pretty much the rest of the world.  Iran cannot be trusted with it and that's that, their government is always unstable and you don't know who'll be controlling the nukes next year.
522599
because the USA wont allow it
777045
Get your facts straight.  The IAEA just issued a report on the amount of spent plutonium discovered upon inspection, which was far more than was required for a peaceful energy program.  If Iran wants to act like a stubborn child they deserve to be treated like one.
230933
This is all very convenient and farcical. You have the most belligerent nation on the planet, the only one that has used nukes in the past, the one that has the capability to destroy the world many times over, behaving like an empire telling nations what they should or should not do.\nThe assumption that other nations who may want nuclear weapons are "crazy" serves as the rationale for not allowing them to have them.\nIf you paint your adversary like a nut job bent on destroying Israel then everything you do or say will be justified.\nI don't particularly like Iran, a theocratic dictatorship, but one must remember that the primary goal of any dictatorship is to stay in power. Iran knows very well that if they would use nukes on anyone, let alone Israel, they would be wiped off the map.\nThe same reasoning was valid for Saddam's Iraq.\nThe last thing a fledgling dictator like him could have wanted was to create a case for being removed. That's why the alarm by the US govt that Iraq was a threat are ludicrous.\nBut people get easily drunk on propaganda.
979010
As a signer to the nuclear NPT, Iran has the RIGHT to enrich uranium for power plant fuel. As the CIA and IAEA documents have stated over and over- time after time, there is ZERO evidence that Iran is even seeking weapons. The only people who say they are is BushCo (the people most interested in manufacturing a reason to invade and steal their oil). Bush is counting on Americans not knowing the difference between "weapons" grade and "fuel" grade uranium enrichment (TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT THINGS). The IAEA and CIA both know that IRAN is complying with the NPT. War mongering Bush is desperately making up outrageous reasons to invade...and I wouldn't put a FALSE FLAG OPERATION past him.\n\nInteresting fact: Israel isn't a signer of the NPT yet has an assload of nuclear bombs.....hmmmm.
443026
Iran hates the United States because we interfered with their moderate government back in the 1950's and put the Shah in power.\n\nThe former government wanted to nationalize the Iranian oil industry, which is a big no-no in the eyes of the US. The Shah was a brutal dictator, and the inevitable occured in 1979 ... Islamic Revolution and the rise of the Ayatollahs.
652202
i think that the average American does not have a problem with Iranian people. The government however has a bad history. I think its best for the entire world if they left nuclear evolution alone.......
564877
Because the US of A is scared. Scared of Iran forming more allies and inspiring other countries to follow. The US of A wants to stay on top and oppress others like always.
689397
Iran is an evil theocracy. The iranian government is attempting to make nukes to use on the United States.
478437
well obviously you know that one isotope is weapons grade and one is not.  the iranians want the isotope that can be dismantled into nuclear weapons because thats what they plan on doing with it...  the United Nations offered to give them the alternative nulcear energy isotope plant but they refuse... they want the weapons grade, wonder why?
351976
Iran is an unstable, extremist government who consistently make comments about wiping it's neighbors off the map.  That country can not be allowed to have a nuke.  For those of you who think that since the USA has nuke all countries should be ALLOWED to have nukes I wonder if you would feel the same if one was dropped on your mom's house or boyfriend, girlfriend, dad  or grandmother.  Sooner or later Iran will have the ability to launch a nuke on the USA.  Remember they are a Muslim country and they believe that people of all other religions should convert or die.
373758
The US is the country that has the most nuclear weapons on the world. And it is always the one country that points the finger to small little no-meaning countries that even don't have the money nor the resources to build 1 bomb. And then they attack them. It is strange that the media does not open their eyes in the media-campaign of nuclear weapons in Iraq/Iran and so on. Nobody writes in the Washington Post or the New York times, that the US has more than 400 Nuclear bombs in deposit. Ready to nuke the world about 20 times. And nobody complains about that.\nAlso the fact that the US did not sign the non-atom-pact, does make it clear that it is the agressor and not the peace-keeper.
532696
It should not be allowed nuclear capabilities, and we should all endever to prevent this occurance, because it is not within the intrests of the Western world. I recognise the arguement that Iran is as unstable or backward as the Western press portray it to be, however a neuclear Iranian would enable it to dictate policy in the region to a much larger degree, look at North Korea for example. The West needs a weaker Iran to exploit its natural resources, we should not be apologetic about this fact, we should however be careful how we go about it. As previous events have shown, badly planned interferance is far worse than isolationism.
308622
As far as I am aware, the 2 atomic bombs that were dropped are still causing deaths today due to birth defects and cancers.\nHyposcrisy? I have often wondered the same thing. The question I ask is why does it appear that the US government only allow the US and it's allies to even have nuclear capability?
680493
The only comments by the US that are relevant to Iran is, it will not allow Iran to be a Nuclear power.  IT has stated, as has the European countries in the UN, that it believes that Iran is seeking to become a Nuclear power.  If the US is a liar on that basis, then so are the European powers.  The consensus is, that Iran is not being truthful about it's intentions relative to nuclear power.  I agree with that consensus!
371556
I'll have to assume that you are asking why the United States is pushing Iran to give up its nuclear program while we maintain one ourselves.\n\nFirst, the nuclear program of the United States does not violate international law. Our program follows conventions agreed to by numerous nations and treaties. Iran will not even open up its program for people to look at. Indeed, Iran denies that a nuclear weapons program exists.\n\nSecond, the United States has displayed six decades of responsible nuclear weapons handling. Iran has displayed nearly three decades of sponsoring terror across the world.\n\nThird, the United States embraces and protects democracy. Iran fails to even recognize them and vows to wipe them off the face of the earth.\n\nFourth, the United States is a nation of laws which, for the most part, get followed. They are written by men who have time to ponder the intent and impact of the laws being written. Iran is a fundamentalist Muslim state whose leaders rule according to whatever their twisted view of the Koran tells them to.\n\nHope that answers your question.\n\nHave a great day, Jock-o!  :-)