if the subconcious is subconcious how did we concidered it's existance?
362042
To answer this correctly, you need to accept there is the ID, EGO and SUPER EGO.\nProgress from here.
510120
Currently, we conclusively know of no such thing.  The majority of the scientific community thinks it unprobable that there ever was such a thing.\n\nIt is not an entirley impossible concept.  We see stranger things in nature.
1068613
the magical composition for a planet to have life on has extraordinary complexity therefor life as we know it in the millions of planets we know so far about is almost impossible but not impossible . perhaps life does exist but not in the way we would expect or could possibly think of . lets not forget that even when we have been for so long in this planet it continues to amaze us , so translating that to the universe i think is just a matter of time before find what we less expected in the most unusual ways .
1746
it is verey possible to exist, all it would really be is a big ape,  many sitings of it have been recorded just not visually.  i think it is real it is just a shy creature most likly.  it could be realted to the yetti or somehting.
1070310
Time does not really exist.  It has a temporal existence that is passing and fading and decaying.  Put simply, there will be a last day, just as there was a first and as such time will have no claim to true existence.  Time will be swallowed by timelessness, as it was before time.  \n\nTime can only exist as timelessness moves aside, and creates a void of timelessness in which time may exist temporally.  Timelessness is the absolute from which time is derived, and upon which time is contingient.\n\nHowever, if you belive that you exist.  then you can say "i am."  You have temporal existence.  But only as the ABSOLUTE "I AM" moved aside for a while so that you could exist within the void of Himself.  You can only say that you are because the Great "I AM" made a place for you by getting out of the way.  \n\nThe Lord is the Absolute "I AM" from which you derived and upon which your ability to say "i am" is contingient.  You would not exist had not God existed before you and moved himself through compression to create a void in which you may temporarily exist.   The only reason you can say "i am" is that God says "I AM."\n\nFurthermore, your temporal existence is the PROOF that absolute existence is the true reality.  Want to disprove God's existence?  Then you must make yourself (and everyone else) non-existant, because each breath you take .. and each moment that someone can say "i am" is the proof of an absolute reality that says "I AM."\n\nGod is beyond the cosmos, and has moved aside to create a void of Himself in which you now exist - the cosmos ... a temporal void.
1005239
the object was created by something , it didnt just appear.\n\nSo as humas, we have a Createor, God, that created us, we didn't just appear, and neither did the bacteria and molecules that scientis claim we came from.  life is life, life just doesnt happen out of thin air.
990088
That could be tricky, and I'm not sure the religious folks so far have thought about the implications. For example, if Jesus did exist and was crucified in "our" universe, then under one of the multi-dimensional paradigms, there must be another universe in which he lived and was NOT crucified.
402489
An observable rule in the material universe is that nothing is the cause of itself, or if you prefer, everything is caused by something else. Think about it for a while... \n\nThe question becomes tricky when we realise that the entire physical universe is a single entity but with innumerable parts. We cannot help but ask, what is the cause of the universe? Clearly the answer cannot lie within the universe as that would contradict what is an observable fact, therefore, the answer must lie outwith material existence. Does the non-material in fact exist? It has too otherwise we have to call into question the ability of reason to reach the truth and the achievements of science certainly demonstrate that human reason is capable of great things.\n\nThe non-material cause of the universe has to be powerful (check out the immensity of the universe and space!), intelligent (look at the order found in the material world - the motion of planets to the human brain to sub-atomic particles), and personal, since intelligence without personhood is unthinkable.\n\nThis non-material, powerful, intelligent and personal being we call God.  How was God created? As a non-material being the physical laws of science do not apply. Therefore God is not created but the cause of what exists, pure being.\n\nAs Christians we claim this God as the God of revelation but since His existence is attainable by pure reason He is also acceptable to deists.
118979
No it does not exist. It is just an acquaintance forced into or chosen for negligble fraction of time in cosmic sense. Acquaintance is just a phenomenon. There is nothing true or false about it.
973786
highly improbable, but possible. not sure how or what but definitely not through any conscious entity, but energy is real. If we have lived once, it must be possible to live again... maybe i'll an amoeba or space bacteria :)
439354
Does one  exist in the first place?
601409
He is God, he always existed. This is difficult for man to understand because we are not infinite creatures. The finite can never understand the infinite.
882892
Science words.  I think about this alot. Even we humans have figured out how to create mini black holes, so I think that it's very possible the universe(s) was 'created'.  On the other hand, pure thought can create reality.  We may be someone's thoughts or someone's dream.....
655859
Who can honestly tell you here? Our finite minds cannot begin to fathom the infinite workings of the universe. There could have been a countless number before us; 42; 3; or we could be it.\n\nWho knows?
235322
We need to distinguish between Mind and Soul.  The mind is indeed a function of the brain, and the Soul is mostly indistinguishable from it while the brain is functioning.  We therefore leave open the question of whether the Soul is something quite apart, which can exist without the physical "housing" of the brain.  I personally think it is something different, and does exist apart from any physical structure, but my reasons are all spiritual/religious, and not in the least scientific.  The most scientific analogy is an idea or a concept, perhaps an archetype.  They clearly exist outside of any physical structure, and I believe the soul does, too.  My real question is whether it is an individual soul, and therefore there are billions of them, or whether we share souls at a higher dimension/level than we normally perceive.  The jury is still out on that one.
400541
I believe in the multiverse in the sense that we are perceiving one universe, but there are many possible realities that could have brought me to my current perceptions and there are many possible realities that originate from my current perceptions.  If there is no such thing as time, then all possible perceptions exist together, and what we perceive as time passing is merely our awareness of particular moments in one of the threads of events that are already existing in the "multiverse".
105102
There is no way of knowing that. Maybe one day we'll have enough information to figure it out. Maybe God created it, if he/she/it exists. Maybe it has simply always been there. Logically, there must be something which has simply always existed.\n\nIn response to the person who answered after me - Something must have simply always been. No matter what it is, you can ask where it came from. And when you have an answer for that, you must question where THAT (the source of the first thing) came from. I'd say it's pretty illogical for that to continue infinitely, so there must be something that came from nothing. I never said that something had to be the matter. Just that there must be something which has simply always been. Maybe the source of all the matter is something that has always been. Those who believe in God would say that he is the source of that matter, and that he has simply always existed. Maybe it is the source of the source of the source of the source of the source (you get the idea) of the matter that has always existed. Logic suggests that eventually you would have to reach the beginning of all existence, and whatever it is that started everything.