Which sentences contain an italicized word that's used as a predicate adjective?
368520
Sentence B\nThe verb "looks" is linkning, therfore its complement is either a predicate nominative or predicate adjective.
1051613
Often, but it doesn't have to, if that's what you're asking.\n\n"I saw him" ends with a pronoun.\n"I sleep" ends with a verb.\n"I slept yesterday" ends with an adverb.\n"The dog is big" ends with an adjective.\n\nSome people will tell you not to end a sentence with a preposition, but that's often a silly rule; "Whose house are you going to?" for example works for me.\n\nMost interjections are a "sentence" in themselves: "Aha!"\n\nYou would not end a sentence with an article or conjunction (unless using them as examples of words, rather than for their meanings: ""Historical" can be preceded by either "a" or "an""; "There will be no ifs, ands, or buts."
220516
It depends on what kind of title it is. If it is of a large work (like a book), then it can be italicized or underlined (those are essentially the same). If it is a short work (like a short story or a poem), then it is in quotes. Add more info. if you are unsure.\n\nAddition: Movies/Documentaries are underlined/italicized.
974163
None of them.  \n\nA, C, and D are grammatically incorrect.\n\nB is wrong because the pronoun is not capitalized correctly.
743839
Be careful with the vague pronoun "it," and avoid it whenever you can, unless the antecedent for it is very evident.  Your sentence which begins "In this essay, it will concentrate on the discourse structure..." should simply use "essay..." as the subject and begin "This essay will concentrate on...."   The phrase "in addition includes the interpretation of a selected text (news) from a newspaper" is confusing and should be a clause.  A better construction for that additional information would be to make it an independent clause.  For example: "Additionally, this essay [and here you need to state why] includes an interpretation of a selected text."  (At that point in the essay, it is not really important whence the selected text comes---save that for when you get to it.)  Also, straight-forward wording is often much better, having a much smoother flow, than the use of pretentiously polysyllablic terminology.  Overall, what you have sounds good.
280542
A sentence can end with "for example." This would generally occur if the whole sentence was giving one example. Here's a sentence to show what I mean, for example.\n\nE.G. is best not used at all in formal writing, but if you do use it, use it to introduce a list of examples, not at the end of a sentence. So, "I like sweet fruits, e.g., Braeburn apples, tangerines, and pineapples." BUT "Different people like different fruits. I like sweet fruits, for example. My sister, on the other hand, likes bitter chocolate." (It's a bit choppy, but not grammatically incorrect.)
634079
C.  The predicate is the verb, only question C. has two action words, washed and ironed.  A and B have compound subjects, D has a compound object.
767465
I had taken algebra. Past tense.\nI ran versions of both sentence structures thru Microsoft Words grammar checker, and it didn't flag either one.
1144998
infused\nprofused\nmused\namused\ndisused
702135
D prepositional phrase because it is:\nin - preposition\na - article (adjective)\ngreat - adjective\nmaze - noun (object of the preposition)\na preposition followed by the object of that preposition is a prepositional phrase.  actually, its a prepositional phrase used as an adverb because it answers the question 'where were they imprisoned?'
255598
It depends on what the sentence is talking about.  \n\nFor example, if your original sentence says "James Mitchell is the instructor of the class." the revised sentence can be "James Mitchell instructs the class."\n\nWithout more detail, I can't suggest any verbs in particular.
800407
A few came up on my word finding software which turned out to be archaic or obsolete but acceptable for Scrabble!\n\nThere will be others such as comparative or superlative adjective forms or verb endings (-ed, -ing etc) which I have not listed in every possible case.\n\naw; ought abought bought fought mought nought rought sought brought thought wrought\n\nuff; anough chough clough enough enrough grough rough roughy roughie roughen shough slough(1) sloughy sough tough toughen tougher toughest toughly toughy toughie unrough\n\now; bough froughy plough drought dought\n\noff; cough coughed trough\n\noh: dough doughy though\n\nuh or oh; borough thorough\n\noo; slough (2) through throughout \n\nup; hiccough\n\nok or okh; lough hough brough
778765
It depends on which is the "subject", and which is the "predicate". "With" would presume association, whilst "By" would suggest Participation.
775058
This might be less specifically useful, but really helpful in the long run:  The easiest way to write these kinds of sentences is to look the words up in a dictionary or thesaurus and put together a sentence that makes sense with simpler words.\n\nFor example:  jubilant is similar to happy.  It might be easier to come up with a way to use happy in a sentence than jubilant.\n\nGood luck with the rest.
383482
the major verb in a sentence is the word ,is,
712363
It is not a sentence...\n\nBeneath the noted universal concerns there lies a distinctive world view.\n\n Or better yet use a semi colon after the word preceeding but ..then replacing it with however and a comma...like this \n\n" ; however, beneath these universal concerns there lies a distinctive worldview."
459291
C. Sandy washed and ironed her clothes\n\nwashed and ironed her clothes is the predicate and the "and" make it compound