1.Find out about the landing by humans on the moon.?
360356
Twelve men have walked on the surface of the moon.
392838
We went to the moon. The simplest answer is usually the correct one, and in this case it's easier to assume that we really went to the moon than there being an international conspiracy involving every nation on Earth lying to say that we never made it to the moon.
543450
well there wasn't just one but the first person to walk on the moon was neil armstrong
399122
There have been a total of 12 people who have set foot on the moon, 2 each from Apollo 11,12,14,15,16 and 17 missions respectively. \n\nThe 12 are as follows:\nNeil Armstrong\nEdwin "Buzz" Aldrin\nPete Conrad\nAlan Bean\nAlan Shepard\nEdgar Mitchell\nDave Scott\nJim Irwin\nJohn Young\nCharles Duke\nGene Cernan\nHarrison Scmitt
341431
There are going to be very soon.\nCheck out NAsa.com or search your local news website for future Moon landing and you'll see the progress that we have been making in that aspect.
45110
Dr. Jack Schm itt and Eugene Cernan left the moon at 21:33 UTC on December 17, 1972. They were the last two astronauts to visit the lunar surface. Dr. Schm itt was the first scientist-astronaut to land on the Moon, and is a geologist.\n \n\nCernan was actually the last man to step off of the Moon. From the NASA journal:\n"Cernan: Bob, this is Gene, and I'm on the surface; and, as I take man's last step from the surface, back home for some time to come - but we believe not too long into the future - I'd like to just (say) what I believe history will record. That America's challenge of today has forged man's destiny of tomorrow. And, as we leave the Moon at Taurus- Littrow, we leave as we came and, God willing, as we shall return, with peace and hope for all mankind. "Godspeed the crew of Apollo 17.""\n\nHere is the NASA lunar surface journal for the Apollo 17 mission:\nhttp://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a17/a17.html\n\nGene Cernan wrote a book about the experience titled "The Last Man on the Moon":\nhttp://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312199066/qid=1127812744/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/002-3854888-7269644?n=507846%7CThe&s=books&v=glance
477918
Outer space...and to the moon.
608588
Yes, the moon landings were real. Some people still maintain that the Earth is flat - no one takes them seriously; no one should take the 'moon landing is a hoax' seriously either.\n\nFirst, we have material evidence: rocks from the moon, photographs taken from there, the word of thousands and thousands of people who worked on the project, etc. Even more damning, the astronauts left a prism mirror on the moon that anyone with a medium laser can target to see the laser reflected! And do you really think the Russians wouldn't have raised a stink if any of their, oh, dozen thousands physicists had found something dodgy? Or do you think they all failed to know about something like 'heat and air on the moon'?\n\nThen we have so much stuff in space now, like thousands of satellites, probes on Mars, and even outside the solar system, what is so unlikely about landing on the moon, which is incredibly close to us, astronomically speaking? It's only 3 days away!\n\nAll the arguments from conspiracy theorists have been easily rebuked; the three sites at the end give a good rundown. The most commons were:\n\n- There is a flag waving! there is no air on the moon! Hoax!\nHum. The flag is not moving, notice? It *looks* like it's in the middle of a wave, because it was built like that! The NASA, incredibly enough, figured out that there was no wind on the moon, and that a limp flag would be a tad disappointing, so simply attached the flag to perpendicular poles in that position. Try it in your garden, it will take 5 minutes.\n\n- The photos are too good! That's not possible!\nNo, they took hundreds of pictures, and you only see the good ones, just like any amateur photographer will tell you. \n\n- The footprint doesn't look at all like the one you leave in sand!\nThat's because the moon is not covered in sand... Sand is created by erosive forces grinding up rock, like the sea or plate tectonics. The moon has no erosive force, since it's dry and not volcanic. The dust there is rocks vaporised by meteoric impacts, which looks a lot like flour. Put a heap of flour on the ground and watch your footprint: very similar, no?\n\nSo, no, the government is not involved in *this* coverup :-)
190294
Yes, the US landed on the moon in 1969!
580105
Neil stepped on the ground first.  Buzz did it second.  And Michael was taking repeated trips around the moon while all of this was happening waiting for the landlubbers to return back in their lunar module to link up with his rocket, and return the three back to earth.  Michael musta been bored.  And probably cried too.  Poor guy.
128409
These are two links that will help you :\nhttp://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/profile.cfm?Object=Moon \n\nhttp://www.solarviews.com/eng/moon.htm \n\nGood luck with your assignment.
411479
Land on the moon or anything, I dun know!
298126
6 Apollo craft have landed on the moon each with 2 astonauts on the moon lander and one man in the orbital craft. Apollo 11,12,14,15,16,17 have all landed on the moon.\nThese 12 men are the only people to have landed on the moon.
355609
http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/Academy/UNIVERSE/MOON.HTML\nhttp://seds.lpl.arizona.edu/nineplanets/nineplanets/luna.html\nhttp://www.solarviews.com/eng/moon.htm\nhttp://home.hiwaay.net/~krcool/Astro/moon/
151208
Six --- Apollos 11,12,14,15,16 and 17\n\nFor those few simpletons who still insist that the manned lunar landings were faked, here are a number of websites that totally blow away that entire pot of idiocy:\n\nhttp://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Apollo_moon_landing_hoax_accusations\n\nwww.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_moon_landing_hoax_accusations\n\nIt takes time and thought to get through the data presented, so it's not as easy as leaping to the easier conclusion that everything was faked.
311873
Because we really did land on the Moon.
303940
twelve americans have stepped onto the lunar soil. they are, in order, neil a armstrong and edwin e aldren (apollo 11), charles conrad and alan bean (apollo 12), alan b shepard and edgar d mitchell (apollo 14), david r scott and james b irwin (apollo 15), john w young and charles m duke (apollo 16), and eugene a cernan and harrison h schmidt (apollo 17).\n\nthe second was edwin e aldren.