What do you make of Bush's New World Order?  Is there any such thing or another urban legion?
363749
New World Order means that all developed countries should work together to achieve the common goal, which is, a harmonious and peaceful world under US dominance. It is a legion but not practical at all. George W. Bush.. he obtained more than 50% vote in 2004 election. If you trust the wisdom of American voters, give Bush a chance, don't give up too early, he still has 2 years to become a respectful president in United States history.
701723
Yes. Bush further destabilized one of the most important regions on the planet. Big time. And the Middle East will stay in chaos for decades. Until we leave and the Iranians with their nuke take control of the region.\n\nThe dumbest unilateral US foreign policy move ever. And we ain't seen nothin yet.
392595
"New World Order" refers to some groups desire for a global community gathered under one governmental body.\n\nThe "Illuminati" is a secret society which some believe are involved in a plot to control world leaders.
338033
Yes, it's something like "New World Order".\n\nCORRECTION: "A New Order of the Ages" is what it means.\n\nSo, basically the same thing.
113042
Do you talk about Matwees or Samurl Huntington's "clash of civilizations"?\nAs it looks it is inevitable. Just hope it will go easy on the world, because Bush looks serious about taking up a war.
493532
He is a puppet of the New World Order of which his father, Donald, Dick and many other elite are members of.\n\nSo Yes!
610908
I watched the video a few of months ago.  After a couple of years of some research I believe the majority of our politicians are completely in the dark as is most of the nation.  \n\nI do, however, believe there is an international conglomerate that uses many of the world governments and their citizens as pawns to establish a New World Order.  Some call them the Elite European Bankers or the Illuminati.  They are real and obviously do exist.\n\nAs for many of the "terorist" acts that have occured in the past, including Sept 11 and the Muir Building in OK City, the evidence is almost overwhelmingly blatant that what really happened is not what the government and the media want us to believe.  \n\nPeople say I'm crazy.  Maybe I am.  Maybe I'm not.
683642
Definitely yes, Bushite regime is attacking the heart of America, with the so called War on terrorism (is War on Democracy) the future of the US seems to be very fearsome and risky, with the organised wars made, US in whole has made a big anti-US community worldwide, the respect that US held a few years back (One of the best Democracy) has now been ruined with the so called "war on terrorism", a state representing or showing faith in democracy should respect the same for others too, how can you justify that "One person did wrong so to punish him I may kill some innocent people who has nothing to do with that person ???" This is in no way democratic, killing of the civilians has brought the US a permanent black spot in the history where no-one if unbiased would justify the wars and the US decisions. Even the US people killed and injured in the same are not less than the people attacked, I always took US as one of the most civilised and democratic and an ideal country but now I think it would be difficult for me to classify US in either of these. Its almost same what Saddam did, He did and his people paid for it, Bush sounds somewhat same but diplomatic, SUBJECT is same, representation is different, so what, PEOPLE ARE KILLED AND IT DOES MATTER (MAY NE NOT TO U.S.) BUT TO THE CHILD WHOSE PARENTS  WERE KILLED, TO THE WIFE WHO IS WIDOWED, TO THE PARENTS WHOSE CHILDREN ARE KILLED, TO THE NATIONS WHOSE GENERATIONS ARE KILLED. MR. BUSH COULD YOU PLS EXPLAIN THE DEFINITION OF DEMOCRACY, I THINK WE ARE UNDER A WRONG IMPRESSION OF WHAT DEMOCRACY IS? BECAUSE PEACE IS NOT SPREAD BY MEANS OF GUNS, INVASIONS AND ATTACKS, ITS SOMETHING THAT HAS TO BE NURTURED AND SOWN. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE I CAN SEE IS - ONE PERSON WITH A GUN IS IN UNIFORM SO HE IS CALLED A MILITARY PERSONEL AND THE OTHER WITHOUT THE UNIFORM AND SO IS CALLED A MILITANT, BUT THE MOTIVES REMAIN SAME FOR BOTH. SORRY, BUT NEVER EXPECTED THIS FROM THE MOST CIVILIZED AND EDUCATED SOCIETY LIKE - THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
298455
One thing, this is not the KKK or the Communist Party.  I am skeptical, but given the paranoia and stupidity in the Bush Administration, who knows ?  Maybe so.\nFat lot of good it will be, unless we are dealing with Richard the IIIrd.  But Bush is not smart enough, though his handlers are.
185901
I'm on the fence about this. I think it was ploted by this administration to insight patriotism in the peaople and as incentive for war. Somewhat like what was done in the 70's. But was it Bush's idea? No he isn't smart enough. It had to be someone higher up like his father or the Freemasons. I know I may sound crazy but its just my opinion. \n\nHey I might be wrong and Bush is probably the best president we've had in years. \n*bursts out laughing*
599482
Yes, It is possible to someday have a "New World Order."  I mean this in the most positive way.  It will take time and some revolutionary type of thinking however.  I have traveled all over the world and I have found that we have more in common with people of the world than we have differences.  People want the same things--good health, happiness, economic opportunity, to raise a family, hope and just governance.  We are closer than many will lead us to believe. It will begin with a vision of common grounds regarding shared values and the continuous denouncing of evil and evil rhetoric.  Certainly, there is going to be hatred and contempt, but we cannot let a small minority of "Terrorists" threaten our very existence.  People are basically good and will choice good over evil once their primal needs are satisfied.  The problem with a world society is one of fairness to all people and sectors of the world.  This becomes a major obstacle to world peace and is probably the one thing that can prevent the evolution of governance to that level.  That notwithstanding--doesn't it sound a lot better to visualize world peace than to live in a world full of hatred and violence?  And a world in which we are united against those who create chaos.  I could envision a day when we are governed by a board of our peers that are responsible for ensuring just and competent governance.
83679
It is absolutely a real entity! When the New World Order comes about, things will get terrible. Prejudice towards fundamental religions, particularly Christianity, will get really tough. Beware! (I am dead serious)
609280
Largely because the only people interested in imposing a New World Order are the ones who want to force everyone to conform to their ideological and religious beliefs.\n\nYou don't need a New World Order if everyone is free. Enlightened anarchy (no, not just plain garden-variety anarchy) is the only truly effective form of government.\n\nNow, we just have to wait for the entire species to become enlightened, and to let go of fear, hatred and prejudice. Then we'll be fine.
916565
Hello,\n\nYou know what, tonight I just watched the movie, "United 93", and at the end of the movie the producers had written some things about how the military were 100 miles away from the planes attacking the Twin Towers. \n\nOut loud I said, "We can thank President Clinton for closing all the military bases in that area. If they had been open, I am sure the military planes could have shot down the terrorists.\n\nBut then, I thought to myself, "Yeah right, this was all part of our governments plan to create a war and find our way into the New World Order."\n\nHope this helps you...................................................  :-)
783487
Bush likes to emulate John Wayne.  Just walk into the bar and challenge anyone to a fight.  Though the Duke never followed the Bush doctrine of "shoot first and ask questions later."  It would be nice if Bush were forced into having more chairs at the table, but his agenda does not call for the kind of help you describe.  Mayor Daly once said in Chicago, "our police are not here to prevent disorder but to preserve it."  I think Bush's plan for the middle east has all along been to destabilize the region,not to make it right.  The other countries you mention could all prove helpful, but that might disturb the no bid Halliburton contracts Cheney obtained for his company.  We can only hope.
929987
Imperialism as we knew it may be no more, but Empire is alive and well. It is, as Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri demonstrate in this bold work, the new political order of globalization. It is easy to recognize the contemporary economic, cultural, and legal transformations taking place across the globe but difficult to understand them. Hardt and Negri contend that they should be seen in line with our historical understanding of Empire as a universal order that accepts no boundaries or limits. Their book shows how this emerging Empire is fundamentally different from the imperialism of European dominance and capitalist expansion in previous eras. Rather, today's Empire draws on elements of U.S. constitutionalism, with its tradition of hybrid identities and expanding frontiers. \n\nEmpire identifies a radical shift in concepts that form the philosophical basis of modern politics, concepts such as sovereignty, nation, and people. Hardt and Negri link this philosophical transformation to cultural and economic changes in postmodern society--to new forms of racism, new conceptions of identity and difference, new networks of communication and control, and new paths of migration. They also show how the power of transnational corporations and the increasing predominance of postindustrial forms of labor and production help to define the new imperial global order. \n\nMore than analysis, Empire is also an unabashedly utopian work of political philosophy, a new Communist Manifesto. Looking beyond the regimes of exploitation and control that characterize today's world order, it seeks an alternative political paradigm--the basis for a truly democratic global society. \n\ncc
586140
New World Order refers to any group who intentionally decides to refashion the world according to some belief or ideology. \n\nIn the US it is the "Discovery Institue" who are the most troublesome in their persuit of a New World Order.\n\nThey plan to-\n-discredit science in favour of intellegent design\n-change the social concience in favour of a less  materialistic version\n-change the social fabric in favour of christian goods and services\n-substitute abstonance for abortion\n\nWhat is worring is that they have been actively involved in these issues. as can be seen in recent events. They use the media/TV anyway to put forward their argument but fail to disclose that it is all a part of the plan of their "New World Order".\n\nUnfortunately Christian members of society, champion their views but most are ignorant of their intensions and are being used and manipulated by the Discovery Institute.\n\nHere is their goals:\n\nTHE WEDGE STRATEGY\nCENTER FOR THE RENEWAL OF SCIENCE & CULTURE\nINTRODUCTION\n\nThe proposition that human beings are created in the image of God is one of the bedrock principles on which Western civilization was built. Its influence can be detected in most, if not all, of the West's greatest achievements, including representative democracy, human rights, free enterprise, and progress in the arts and sciences.\n\nYet a little over a century ago, this cardinal idea came under wholesale attack by intellectuals drawing on the discoveries of modern science. Debunking the traditional conceptions of both God and man, thinkers such as Charles Darwin, Karl Marx, and Sigmund Freud portrayed humans not as moral and spiritual beings, but as animals or machines who inhabited a universe ruled by purely impersonal forces and whose behavior and very thoughts were dictated by the unbending forces of biology, chemistry, and environment. This materialistic conception of reality eventually infected virtually every area of our culture, from politics and economics to literature and art\n\nThe cultural consequences of this triumph of materialism were devastating. Materialists denied the existence of objective moral standards, claiming that environment dictates our behavior and beliefs. Such moral relativism was uncritically adopted by much of the social sciences, and it still undergirds much of modern economics, political science, psychology and sociology.\n\nMaterialists also undermined personal responsibility by asserting that human thoughts and behaviors are dictated by our biology and environment. The results can be seen in modern approaches to criminal justice, product liability, and welfare. In the materialist scheme of things, everyone is a victim and no one can be held accountable for his or her actions.\n\nFinally, materialism spawned a virulent strain of utopianism. Thinking they could engineer the perfect society through the application of scientific knowledge, materialist reformers advocated coercive government programs that falsely promised to create heaven on earth.\n\nDiscovery Institute's Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture seeks nothing less than the overthrow of materialism and its cultural legacies. Bringing together leading scholars from the natural sciences and those from the humanities and social sciences, the Center explores how new developments in biology, physics and cognitive science raise serious doubts about scientific materialism and have re-opened the case for a broadly theistic understanding of nature. The Center awards fellowships for original research, holds conferences, and briefs policymakers about the opportunities for life after materialism.\n\nThe Center is directed by Discovery Senior Fellow Dr. Stephen Meyer. An Associate Professor of Philosophy at Whitworth College, Dr. Meyer holds a Ph.D. in the History and Philosophy of Science from Cambridge University. He formerly worked as a geophysicist for the Atlantic Richfield Company.\n\nTHE WEDGE STRATEGY\nP