Basic straight line depreciation, and basic double-declining balance depreciation?
371728
straight line = 150,000 (200,000 * 1/12 *3 years)\ndouble-declining = 115,740.75 (1/12 * 200% = 16.66%)\n\n200,000*16.66% = 33,333.33\n166,666*16.66% = 27,777.77\n138,888*16.66% = 23,148.15\n\nAccumulated depreciation after 3 years = 84259.25\n200,000-84259.25=115,740.75\n\nAny more homework you need done, ha!
1014552
False.  It's an individual retirement account.  It doesn't really have much to do with valuing inventory.  Those are FIFO, LIFO, and so on.
638305
Ok, here it comes:\n\nBalance Sheet\nAssets = Liabilities + Equity\n\nIncome Statement\nRevenue - Expenses = Net Income/Net Loss\n\nOnce you know what your net income or loss is, it is added or substracted to/from the company's equity (represented in the Balance Sheet). This is how net income affects the equation, as the equity will increase or decrease, increasing or decreasing your assets.\n\nHope this helps.
1148875
The *right* way to figure this out is to use an algebraic\nformula, but I think it's easier to visualize if you use a\nspreadsheet.\n\nIt's slightly difficult to present a table in Yahoo Answers\nbecause everything is jammed hard against the left\nmargin.  [I'm not sure why that's a feature.]  To help\nreduce the column misalignment, I displayed all of the\nnumbers with a constant width (ie. with leading zeros\nwhen necessary).  Bottom line is that you'd have\n$30344.87 at the end of eleven years.\n\nYear == years since start of account (in half year increments)\nRate == interest rate\nBalance == running balance of account\nInterest == interest payment for previous 6 months\n\n\nYear    Deposit     Rate   Balance  Interest\n\n00.00    820.00     0.000  00820.00   0000.00\n00.50    820.00     1.050  01681.00   0041.00\n01.00    820.00     1.050  02585.05   0084.05\n01.50    820.00     1.050  03534.30   0129.25\n02.00    820.00     1.050  04531.02   0176.72\n02.50    820.00     1.050  05577.57   0226.55\n03.00    820.00     1.050  06676.45   0278.88\n03.50    820.00     1.050  07830.27   0333.82\n04.00    820.00     1.050  09041.78   0391.51\n04.50    820.00     1.039  10214.41   0352.63\n05.00    820.00     1.039  11432.77   0398.36\n05.50    820.00     1.039  12698.65   0445.88\n06.00    820.00     1.039  14013.90   0495.25\n06.50    820.00     1.039  15380.44   0546.54\n07.00    820.00     1.039  16800.28   0599.84\n07.50    820.00     1.039  18275.49   0655.21\n08.00    820.00     1.039  19808.23   0712.74\n08.50    820.00     1.039  21400.76   0772.52\n09.00    820.00     1.039  23055.38   0834.63\n09.50    820.00     1.039  24774.54   0899.16\n10.00    820.00     1.039  26560.75   0966.21\n10.50    820.00     1.039  28416.62   1035.87\n11.00    820.00     1.039  30344.87   1108.25\n\nAdditional comment:\n\nOh man, I messed this up.  Thanks to "Mark Taranto"\nfor catching and correcting my mistake.  \n\nI took yet another look at this and want to\nwork through it carefully.  We appear to have\nas many different answers as there are people\nsubmitting solutions.\n\nOn day 1, Joanne put in $820, so that's her's balance.\n\nAfter 1/2 year, the bank would add half of 5% interest,\nwhich is 820*.025 = 20.50 and Joanne would add another \n$820.  So after six months, she would have:\n\n$820 + $20.50 + $820 = $1660.50\n\n\nAfter one year, the bank will again add half of 5% as\ninterest, which would be $1660.50 * 0.025 = $41.51.  \nThen Joanne would add $820, so the new total would be:\n\n$1660.50 + $41.51 + $820 = 2522.01\n\nContinuing this process in the spreadsheet, the\nfinal result after 11 years is:\n\n$23809.46\n\nThe corrected spreadsheet follows:\n\nYear  Deposit  Rate    Balance  Interest\n\n00.0  820.00  0.0000  00820.00  000.00 \n00.5  820.00  0.0250  01660.50  020.50\n01.0  820.00  0.0250  02522.01  041.51\n01.5  820.00  0.0250  03405.06  063.05\n02.0  820.00  0.0250  04310.19  085.13\n02.5  820.00  0.0250  05237.94  107.75\n03.0  820.00  0.0250  06188.89  130.95\n03.5  820.00  0.0250  07163.62  154.72\n04.0  820.00  0.0250  08162.71  179.09\n04.5  820.00  0.0250  09186.77  204.07\n05.0  820.00  0.0195  10185.92  179.14\n05.5  820.00  0.0195  11204.54  198.63\n06.0  820.00  0.0195  12243.03  218.49\n06.5  820.00  0.0195  13301.77  238.74\n07.0  820.00  0.0195  14381.15  259.38\n07.5  820.00  0.0195  15481.59  280.43\n08.0  820.00  0.0195  16603.48  301.89\n08.5  820.00  0.0195  17747.24  323.77\n09.0  820.00  0.0195  18913.31  346.07\n09.5  820.00  0.0195  20102.12  368.81\n10.0  820.00  0.0195  21314.12  391.99\n10.5  820.00  0.0195  22549.74  415.63\n11.0  820.00  0.0195  23809.46  439.72
712944
Most machines are depreciated over 7 years or less therefore it would seem that the basis in this item would be zero ($0.00).  The next issues would seem to be the nature of disposition.  It it is sold for the FMV you would have an income of $35,000.  If the presumed tax rate were 40% which would mean $14,000 after tax value would be $21,000.
262541
it is a profit and loss. what is comeing in and going out. down to the penny. quick books does it for you.
398740
LTM = Last Twelve Months\n\nEBITDA = Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization
287375
Return is what you get (or expect to get) divided by what you invested.\nAnnualised Return is, given a Return over a period of time (say L), how much would you get over a year period.\nFor SIMPLE (or not compound) interest, you have\nR= 360 / L x r, where\nR is annualised return,\nr is EFFECTIVE return (that is, what you EFFECTIVELY get)\nand L is the investment period.\n\nIt's a simple (and archaic, let's say) way to compare yields for different investment periods.\n\nABSOLUTE RETURN is opposed to RELATIVE RETURN.\nThat is, absolute return is how much do you get, while relative return is how much you over a given benchmark, or comparison measure.\nAbsolute return, as weel as Relative Return, can be expressed in both annualised or effective terms.\nHope it helps
1005108
Simple interest is hardly ever used anymore.\n\nIt is certainly compound interest.
1025881
Sounds like a homework question.\n\nBy the matching principal, you recognize expenses in the same period as the revenues that they generated.  In this case, it is depreciation expense.
313319
It's been so long since I did ratios, I don't know if I remember them exactly...but I think current ratio is 2.5 ($40,000 current assets / $16,000 current liabilities), debt to equity would be 0.75 (Current liabs plus long term liabs = $60,000 / $80,000 equity), return on equity would be 9% ($7,200 / $80,000).  Hope you are just using these as check figures!!!
139495
Let's define some variables for the equation.\n\nD = monthly deposit ($200)\nr = annual interest rate (10% is 0.1)\nn = compound frequency (12 months in a year)\nA = account balance\ni = compounded interest\n\nLet's start the account this month, or month 0.\n\nA(0) = D\n\nOne month later, you make another deposit and earn some interest. But you only earn 1/12 of the 10% with you existing balance, which is r/12.  \n\nA(1) = D + A(0) + i(1)\n\nwhere, i(1) = A(0) * r/n. Which makes\n\nA(1) = D + A(0) + A(0) * r/n , or\nA(1) = D + A(0) * (1 + r/n ), or\nA(1) = D + A(0)*R, if R = 1 + r/n, but A(0) is D, so\nA(1) = D + D*R\n\nTwo months later, you make another deposit and earn some interest on the balance A(1). Similarly calculating,\n\nA(2) = D + A(1) * R, or\nA(2) = D + (D + D*R) * R, or\nA(2) = D + D*R + D*R^2\n\nKeep on going to three months later, \n\nA(3) = D + A(2) * R, or\nA(3) = D + D*R + D*R^2 + D*R^3, or\nA(3) = D * (1 + R + R^2 + R^3)\n\nFollowing this pattern, k months later, we get\n\nA(k) = D * (1 + R + R^2 + ... + R^k)\n\nNow, let's calculate the general expression (1 + R + R^2 + ... + R^k) in a closed form.\n\nLet S = (1 + R + R^2 + ... + R^k). Multiply R on both sides, we get\nS*R = (1 + R + R^2 + ... + R^k) * R, or\nS*R = R + R^2 + ... + R^k + R^(k + 1)\n\nSubtracting the two equations S*R and S on both sides, we get\n\nS*R - S = R + R^2 + ... + R^k + R^(k + 1)  - (1 + R + R^2 + ... + R^k)\n\nNotice the terms R all the way through R^k on the right hand side are cancelled and only left with R^(k + 1) - 1. So we have,\n\nS*R - S = S(R - 1) = R^(k + 1) - 1\n\nDividing (R - 1) on both side, we get\n\nS = [R^(k + 1) - 1] / (R - 1)\n\nRewriting the account balance at month k,\n\nA(k) = D * (1 + R + R^2 + ... + R^k), or\nA(k) = D*S = D * [R^(k + 1) - 1] / (R - 1)\n\nNow, 26 years make 26 * 12 = 312 months. But since you start with 0, so your k is actually 311. R = 1 + r/n = 1 + 0.1/12, and D = 200. So\n\nA(311) = 200 * [(1 + 0.1/12)^(311 + 1) - 1] / (1 + 0.1/12 - 1), or\nA(311) = 295667.15330119169 = 295667.15 (round to nearest penny)
205899
Many approaches:\n\n1) Discount cash flow method. Work out all the projected free cash flows of the company and then do a dcf on it. The key is not in doing up the model - the key is in your assumptions (as in all models);\n\n2) Multiples - look for a listed company in a similar industry and use a EBITDA multiple to find out an approx value. Check yahoo finance - it is rather good for info finding;\n\n3) Asset valuation method - not as accurate as the above but add up all the assets of the company. Note that the sum may be worth more than each piece if all is functioning together well;\n\n4) replacement value - check out the market values of all the assets and value that. \n\n5) Net Asset Value - Assets minus liabilities for a really general ballpark figure. \n\nI generally use 1 & 2. 3-5 are just very general guides.
140555
http://www.kiplinger.com/personalfinance/features/archives/2004/02/hsa.html
162629
This is really not a difficult question.  If this is tough, the rest of the course will only get worse.  \n\nHowever, you can figure it out by this:\n\nWACC = (Percentage Equity * Cost of Equity) + (Percentage debt * Cost of Debt * (1-Tax))\n\nHopefully that helps.
84661
and here is another....you can do prepayment savings analysis on this one too!!  Enjoy\n\nhttp://www.jeacle.ie/mortgage/
361454
Generally, the interest rate elasticity and the duration are used.  The first is the change in value based on the change in rates.  The second is the maturity of a zero with the same elasticity as the given rate/value.\n\nThere's a bunch of math behind it and you can look at the paper below.