Is bush the missing link to darwins theory.?
357052
Bush is missing a few links
69537
Conclusive no, it's still a theory. However, in 2005 probably more than any other year, the theory has received it most compelling validation through DNA analysis.\n\nComparison of DNA between species is mapping out a family tree which matches what the theory of evolution predicts.
1160398
He came up with the Theory of Evolution
1043841
Hitlers plan was to correct evolution and erradicate entire races of people who had made the human race "soft" - and publically stated this.  Bush has not been proven to be as radical or as insane yet.
797853
Yes Marx was on to something but some of his ideas were a little far fetched.\n\nalso Darwin's views have been twisted to be racist. he did not write the origin of species to relate to people. the man is talking about animals.
292900
Er, Einstein doesn't HAVE a theory on evolution. What he does have is a theory of relativity. Go to Darwin for theory on evolution
521655
I hate to trip the bush lovers up with facts, but YES, it is true. Please check out the link below and feel free to pass it around....\nhttp://www.oldamericancentury.org/bushco/bush_crime_family.htm
457129
how about Charles Darwin?
195109
Depending on how the sentence is arranged it could well be true. Bear with me. Suppose I take the last two words, "work seekers," as the definition of the population to be "analyzed." \n\nWould you be totally shocked to learn that only 6% of job seekers approve of Bush? (I'm thinking a lot of folks looking for jobs hold any current administration in lower regard than the part of the population who isn't looking for a job. And even that group only gives him an approval rating of less than 40%. )\n\nIt's true I would expect the unemployment rate to be higher than 38% for work seekers. After all, one assumes a work seeker doesn't have a job. That assumption, however, could be mistaken. Many people could be looking for second jobs.\n\nAnd if that's not what you meant, then Mike Gilbert is right.
127184
This has baffled me too.  I have a friend who is crazy about Bush and she explained it this way:  "I love Bush, because he's like a common person in the way he trips over his words and sometimes doesn't make sense.  I don't really trust intellectuals that much."  I hope this isn't the prevailing sentiment in the United States, but it would explain how we ended up with such a person as the visible face of America to the rest of the world.
1172049
there is talk of a split of us to orthodox jim darwinism\n\nthe current mainstream jim darwinism is treating jim darwin like a god and that wasnt the intention
963651
wow, couldn't you find ANYONE to agree with you?\n\nthat's a real shame.  \n\neven your buddy Bush can find a few people to agree with him.
363324
There is no proven connection at this time, hence it being a "theory." There are definite similarities, like we share 93% of the same genetic similarities with orangutans.
653816
Evolution is a theory.
983838
Darwin never "withdrew" his theory, nice try.\n\nYou're right there were lots of storms and meteorites.  For all we know, life needed a couple of tries to get started.\n\nJust the fact that you are asking whether we came from monkeys or from goo, shows that you either have NO idea what evolution is about or are just trying to get a rise out of people.  You bore me.
919450
Evolution is only a theory. The theory states that more complex life forms evolved from more simple life forms. A brontosaurus, according to the theory, would evolve from a much smaller plant eater with a much smaller neck. I don't know the exact name of the species, but I can get that information for you though it goes beyond the scope of this question.\n\nThere are bones of apelike animals that would have had brains equal in size to our own, but bone structure vastly different than human beings bones. Did modern humans wipe out intelligent apes or was that us? The theory of evolution has flaws like the Big Bang theory and many other scientific theories. The theory of evolution is far from perfect which is why you can't seem to make sense of it.\n\nWhat is missing from the theory is the so-called "missing link." If a giraffe evolved a longer neck over millions of years why are there no bones of these intermediary stages of giraffes with slightly longer necks? Just its ancestor and the modern animal.
509868
I never heard that story, it strikes me as contrived bollox anyway, but no, it makes no difference.   Anyone that thinks it matters is searching desperately for something to substantiate that anti-intellectual horror: creationism.  Science works because it outlasts every individual scientist, to be tested and refined again by the next generation of open minded clever people.  Evolution has, er, evolved quite a lot since Darwin's time, and many of the puzzles left by him have been solved.   If Newton had recanted, apples would still fall to the ground.