why would someone not get bail for child pornography?
375400
The Constitution allows for denial of Bail for people who pose a risk of fleeing to avoid prosecution. The amount of jail time in most states for Child Porno is very lengthy up to and including Life without parole.\n\nThe person once convicted is also at risk of loosing his life after entering the prison population. You see, even criminals, hate Child Porno Perverts, and kill them.\n\nSo as you can see this person has all the reason in the world to flee and try to  avoid going to prison.
589569
if they are then they have a warrant and there must be a very good reason for doing so.  if they do it illegally then it just ruins their case against the suspect
869222
Such things fall under the jurisdiction of the home country of the host site, and not all countries are quite so keen on trying to bust pedophiles (though this is starting to change). Interpol can get involved, but their resources are stretched rather thin with other criminal activities.
621029
because people are crappy parents and dont want to do any work, they dont want to sit down with there kids and explain how things work, they want to abuse them and then wonder why they listen to shitty music and shoot people. then they arent createive enough to come up with a god reason for it to happen so they blame someone they can sue.
92601
The laws regarding obscenity charges etc are not even state laws usually but are set at the local level. I live in Georgia with a similar political climate and here there is no police coming to people's homes to check for porn. What I would do though to be safe is sell any such movies online because then what you sell becomes interstate commerce and is only subject to federal law through the interstate commerce clause in the US constitution.
200663
It isn't for excuses, it is so they GET THE POINT!!!!\n\nPutting them in jail would be WORSE, but they deserve to be smacked around for not supporting their children!  \n\nSCUM SCUM SCUM!
150826
I believe the reason no one else has answered is the same as my reason, but I figured I may as well tell you.  I do not like to answer questions that expect me to "hit the blue line" before I do.  I have been burned by viruses (virii?) too many times, and too many times simply found that the next thing wanted was my contact information.  Then spam comes spewing out my email inbox like the owl post to Harry Potter in the first movie!\n\nI love kids, and hate to think of them being abused, but I know that such a tear-jerker cause can be exploited shamelessly by people who are far more interested in their own agenda.  I do not want to fall victim to those types anymore than I want kids to fall victim to any abuser.\n\nThere are also sensitive issues about false claims of abuse during heated divorce cases, people who consider the term "child abuse" a convenient buzz word every time a parent disciplines a child, however mildly, etc.  There are people who would force parents to surrender their rights to their children to "security," as our federal government has asked us to surrender our right to privacy to "security."  There are people who would shut down a day-care center on charges of abuse, when what they really want is to gain control over the children themselves.\n\nIt's a mean, mean world out there, and I hope you are sincere.  I'm not convinced this is the way to go about what you are trying to do (I hope) to help the kids themselves.
27365
Several reasons:\n\n1.  Trailers (economic reason).  Free pornography is given out as a preview, an enticement to buy a longer or unedited version.\n\n2.  Theft (anarchic reason).  Like music or software, pornography that may have been purchased legally can be illegally copied to a computer and uploaded.\n\n3.  Exhibitionism (psychological reason).  Some people just like to show their naked bodies to strangers, either via webcam or the upload of still images.
865327
hmm good question.  Since it's not real children I'd wager a guess that it would have to be an already convicted pedophile to have it to be violating parole.\n\nPedophiles are the scum of the earth!
717945
Against the people who abused said child, yes.  But I wouldn't get my hopes up about going up against any state run agencies.
409619
I would imagine that would be possible if you were to show that the parents are incapable or unwilling to care for the child and provide a safe environment.  It would probably be a long, slow process; however, if the child is in an abusive or drug oriented situation, it would be worth the effort to protect the child.  Unfortunately, it may depend on a judge and we have seen lately how they rule on a lot of cases against people who should be in prison.
497799
I have known other people in similar situations as you are in. One close friend was accused of molesting his daughter by his ex wife. She reported him a few hours after a custody hearing in which she lost.  The child said her father never touched her, the ex and prosicutors convinced a jury the child denied the abuse because she was afraid of the father. He is still in prison for a crime the victim said never happened.  The child is no little kid eather, she was a teen. \n\nPeople need to realize just how false accusations not only hurt the accused but the children too. I wish Americans would wake up and see this sort of thing happens all the time.\n\nThis makes me wonder just how many innocent people are in jail. These people are not going to get freed by DNA testing because there is none. Part of the reason why I became a civil rights activist.\n\nI think CPS has become a tool of the devil and is used to take control of our children. If you can control what the children think you can take over a country. Just look at how uneducated our society is today on Constitutional rights? Your situation is a prime example of many constitutional violations yet we as a society continue to allow it.  Why?\n\nI am sorry I can't give you an answer to quickly solve your problem. The only advice I can give is lots of prayer(and it works no matter what your religous beliefs are) and get a good attorney with experience in these types of cases.
152674
you may try Oprah...she's had many stories on her show and recently had one of a teen enslaved by child porn via webcam.took a NY times reporter to expose the truth as the police didnt intervene for 50 days.
316434
It depends upon the crime he has been charged with. The courts are not compelled to release people they believe to be a danger to society or a flight risk, however they can't hold them without cause either. His lawyer should be filing a Writ of Habeus Corpus if there is some question.
178822
Because there's so many devils in the world & the net gives them easier access. They can get to kids they might otherwise couldn't have. The death penalty would be too easy, make them suffer!!  It's about time they did something about the perverts on the net!!
53942
Since child MOLESTING would have nothing to do with child pornography (as far as legality is concerned), I think you must have part of the story wrong.
65666
Other than help them get the best lawyer you can afford, I don't really know.\n\nIf they are in jail, a good lawyer might be more likely to get them out on bail.  They are more likely to rebut the prosecution's case or to come up with evidence to exonerate this person.\n\nIf their bail is too high for them to be released, perhaps you could help with securing a bond.  It all depends on how much you can or want to help.