which religion has science proven to be the closest to true,and /or possible?
371582
Zero, zip, nada, none...
279136
Science=evidence, data, repeatable experiments, facts\nGod= believe, faith, intangible\nI am a biologist and I believe in God, not religion necessarily but GOD. You don't measure it, or test, or experiment on God it is something you can feel inside when you look at something you find beautiful and are amazed.  When you feel everything is going wrong but you continue, when you keep going on hope.
729951
Hocus Pocus, pure and simple!\n\n(I was a catholic for 28yrs until I decided to study up on my "religion" from their own writings, and was amazed at the nonsense of it). They, themselves, convinced me it was false!
353156
Christianity as well as other religions are not real, science is the only real answer to your question!
899015
You can choose to use either your (1) faith or (2) reason.  If you choose to use only faith, then you must ignore the physical world about you.\n\nReligious faith is completely compatible with science as long as religion stays exclusively in the spiritual realm and science stays exclusively in the physical realm.  It is only when religion pontificates about the physical world or science speculates about the non-physical that we run into trouble.
676697
Religion in regards to Christianity is not opposed to science.  If something scientific is a true, valid fact, it will not be in opposition to the Bible, because Jesus is truth and rooted in history. \n\nThere is no physical energy present.  Both science and the Bible concur on this.  However, the Bible will go on to explain that you do have a soul which will continue on.
143326
Science is a useless substitute for religion.\nReligion is a useless substitute for science.\n\nScience requires the tools of science. Religion requires the tools of religion. \n\nYou do not use a ruler to find the temperature or a screwdriver to measure air pressure. Both the ruler and the screwdriver are good tools, but each useless when used inappropriately for a task they\nwere never designed to accomplish.\n\nIn their purest forms science cannot prove or disprove religion and religion cannot prove or disprove science. They are two vastly different tools.
875740
The key words are faith and belief. that is why I get so on my high horse when religions try to invoke science to try and prove thier god exists, or even worse use their god to prove science doesn't.
1103609
I'd say science, but that doesn't seem to need proof, as a logical theory will suffice. We keep revising the age of everything as new evidence is introduced (which we should), but then take that new estimate as gospel truth. Humans need the security of believing that we understand the world around us, whether it be handed down from someone above, or a collection of our own limited observations. Proof, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.
203736
Christian Science was an attempt by Mary Baker Eddy.  However, I think that the rational world and religion don't have a common base at the present.  Maybe someday rationality and a sense of the deeper, spiritual side of humanity will find a common home. Spirituality and religion are not the same, however. Religion plus Science: no.  Spirituality plus Science: yes. I think the Great Chain of Being describes the potential, rather than the actual.  Everything is possible, every kind of being, but only some have been realized.  \nI see where you're going.  Is this an alternative to "Intelligent Design?"  Perhaps.  Evolution is real in the physical, material sense.  TGCOB makes sense on another level, that of alternate realities.  \nStay with it. I like where you're going.
586516
No, the big bang is not  pseudoscience. It is the best theory going for how scientists think the world works.\n\nPseudoscience would be like believing in something by faith alone with no proof at all, and no way to disprove it.
869180
The only faith required for science is the belief that the physical universe is at least partially knowable. Where gaps are filled in by conjecture, scientists are busy trying to prove or disprove the conjectures - no one takes it on faith. The fact that science may see things differently next year makes it very different from religion, where any change in the dogma leads to accusations of heresy and other histrionics. \n\nScience is also willing to admit it doesn't know everything, where religion expects you to accept it as absolute truth. Your understanding of science is very distorted; I hope you will manage to gain some education in that area.
110204
Dear. ISlam is the fastest growing religion in the world today. Its a true religion. more then 70% of quran has been proven scientifically correct and the rest is not proven yet. but not 1% is proven wrong.The best way is to study Islam. and if u need any resources please contact me on my email below. i'll try my best to find the topics u need. may God guide u to the right path.\nU must visit : \nhttp://www.irf.net/irf/comparativereligion/index.htm\nmy email is lion_mughal@yahoo.com
553047
Just logic. Science has answered so many things about the world that religion hasn't been able to.\n\nThere is no need for religion or "Jesuses" anymore.
518285
Jehovah's Witnesses have the true religion.
110452
There are none....only Christianity is self evidenced by the Creator Himself through the Holy Spirit once salvation is accepted Through Jesus Christ ever thing else is works religion.
414676
1 is not true. Most scientists are religious. \n\n2 is true if you add "some" at the beginning. Not all people believe that there is a god.