what does article 32 say?
375698
Article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (Section 832 of Title 10, United States Code), requires a thorough and impartial investigation of charges and specifications before they may be referred to a general court-martial (the most serious level of courts-martial).\n(a) No charge or specification may be referred to a general court-martial for trial until a through and impartial investigation of all the matters set forth therein has been made. This investigation shall include inquiry as to the truth of the matter set forth in the charges, consideration of the form of charges, and recommendation as to the disposition which should be made of the case in the interest of justice and discipline.\n\n(b) The accused shall be advised of the charges against him and of his right to be represented at that investigation as provided in section 838 of this title (article 38) and in regulations prescribed under that section. At that investigation full opportunity shall be given to the accused to cross-examine witnesses against him if they are available and to present anything he may desire in his own behalf, either in defense or mitigation, and the investigation officer shall examine available witnesses requested by the accused. If the charges are forwarded after the investigation, they shall be accompanied by a statement of the substance of the testimony taken on both sides and a copy thereof shall be given to the accused.\n\n(c) If an investigation of the subject matter of an offense has been conducted before the accused is charged with the offense, and if the accused was present at the investigation and afforded the opportunities for representation, cross-examination, and presentation prescribed in subsection (b), no further investigation of that charge is necessary under this article unless it is demanded by the accused after he is informed of the charge. A demand for further investigation entitles the accused to recall witnesses for further cross-examination and to offer any new evidence in his own behalf.\n\n(d) The requirements of this article are binding on all persons administering this chapter but failure to follow them does not constitute judicial error.
854114
It is practically impossible to answer your question because you do not have enough information.  What article, source, or amendment?  Are you referring to some type of statute?  Are you referring to a Constitutional Amendment?  An article of a statute?  \n\nYou don't have enough information here.  You should go to the library and speak to the librararians.  They will be able to assist you.
320346
"The new constitution contains human rights provisions, although their practical effect had not come fully into play since most provisions depended on implementing still-ongoing legislative and institutional changes."\n\nFor a full breakdown, see here:  http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/060322/2006032221.html
67177
Amendment II\n\nA well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
86137
It's a statement of policy.  It's meant to be authoritative and is used as a basis for future regulations and laws although it has no legal standing in and of itself.
318509
It is a list of international laws laid down by the UN council, it gives the fundamental rights which each human being deserves, including freedom of speech and education.  UN countries must work towards providing these rights for their citizens.
995289
All of it. It is all under review, and due for a complete overhaul upgrade. Some aspects will be kept similar or the same, but the majority of the rules are expected to change toward more complicated, difficult to understand terms and conditions, allowing more loopholes, even though the authorities claim the purpose is to simplify and make it so anyone can understand. This is a commonplace political tactic used globally, particularly in Western countries, to impede the public understanding and increase control and ability to manipulate the masses for unjust purposes. There is very little you can do about this, now that you know. Sorry.
277002
Absolutely.  It's freedom of speech.  Its the first ammendment of the constitution.(Bill of rights section)
197061
The First:\nCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
33557
Article 1, Section 3 reads:\n\n"No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen."
859218
Here it is:\n\n\nhttp://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/26/1551240
1140214
Have you ever read the UN Declaration of Rights? It's complete horse manure! It has things in it like the "right to electricity" or the "right to a job" those aren't rights, those are things that must be earned, not provided by a government at the expense of taxpayers. As a U.S. Citizen, I don't want my government committing me to some treaty that's been endorsed by a bunch of dictators and autocrats.
233393
you're not going to believe this, but I've found it:\n\nhttp://weyersheim.net.chez-alice.fr/BoulangerieHuss/reglementations.htm\n\nit's an abridged version of the legislation. You can get a translated version by babelfish, http://babelfish.av.com
800756
http://www.un.org/News/ossg/fy.htm
12630
Lawful orders?\nAre you military?\n\nThe UCMJ is quite clear on this.  Lawful orders MUST be carried out.
779444
Exactly, it's not a complete sentence.\nNo doubt it informs you about your right to protest against the decision:\n\n"(You can file an appeal) against this decision within 30 days of its communication at..."\n\nThe part in parentheses is not part of the German sentence you posted, but I'm sure it belongs there, I'm sure your sentence continues with \n1) where you should address your appeal to, and\n2) "Berufung eingelegt werden" or "berufen werden" or some similar words, meaning to appeal or to file an appeal.\nI'm sure because legal language is kind of predictable... it always uses similar phrases/structure.\n\nSo in essence: You can file an appeal (=protest) against the decision within 30 days of the date on this document with the authority/department stated after the word "beim" (the last word you provided)
299668
Where does it say we have a right to tell another country what they can or can not have? \nThe only right we have and should do is tell them what we'll do to them if they use that weapon on us or any of our interests. Then follow though without hesitation or a blink of an eye if they do. Simple as that.