What country that have more than enough for nuclear armaments?
369293
Total warheads listed.\n\nUnited States 9,960\nRussia (formerly the Soviet Union) 16,000\nUnited Kingdom <200\nFrance 350\nPeople's Republic of China 400\nIndia 40-50\nPakistan 24-48 \nNorth Korea 0-10
33660
It all depends on the country and the number of missiles with the nuclear warheads on them. It the country only had about 10 bomb it would definitely be possible. A country like Russia or China with 1000s of warheads it would be nearly impossible.
62970
THE U.S. has more nukes than we know what to do with.  Any idiotic country that would openly attack us  deserves to die in a nuculear holacost for their stupidity.
507070
You should say that the USA has WMD, why should not anybody else?\n\nThink about it. The USA is the only country to have used nuclear weapons. How can we trust them not to use them again? We can't. Other countries have the rights to protect themselves against the USA's nuclear attacks.
398746
About 27,000. About 13,000 of these are ready to use, the rest are in long-term storage.  Of the 27,000 total warheads, 26000 are in the US and Russia.
101653
China is estimated to have an arsenal of around 400 nuclear warheads, down from 435 in 1993. China is thought to have produced some 600 nuclear warheads since 1964, and U.S. intelligence and defense agencies predict that over the next 15 years China may increase the number of warheads on primarily U.S-targeted missiles from 20 to between 75--100.
638207
None.\n\nThe five Nuclear Powers.\n\nThe World should stop at 5 Nuclear Powers.\n\nThe nukes may never go away.\n\nBut it helps to know there has not been a single nuclear attack against any country since Nagasaki 1945. That is more than 60 years ago.It would be safe to keep it that way.\n\nCan anyone guarantee the same if other countries(ANY) start developing nuclear weapons indiscriminately?
493174
lol what shit. currently its\n1.china 2.russia 3.Uk 4.america 5.N korea\nhow can a country that cant beat iraq and was afraid of N korea be 1st? technology is there but then just like in vietnam china would throw their bodys at it and over power them. Uk is 3rd due to the fact of their training and also global support that currently usa doesnt have.
1086575
I feel uncomfortable with any nation having nuclear weapons.  If you are refering to general technology, such as power plants, then not necessarily, because there are a lot of countries without democratically elected governments that have nuclear technology.  It does not matter who has the technology, its how they use it that is important.
931297
nothing at all, 6 countries have nukes now, only 1 more country is needed for the prophecy to be fulfilled.
1049152
This is a very difficult question.  Yes, every country has the right to nukes, it is only fair.  However, that being said, every country having nukes is going to lead to an apocolyptic war, so it is in the interest of the entire world to limit the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
840879
As pointed out there are many levels on which this could be answered.\nHowever, your question suggests which country has the most might regardless of component factors.\nhere goes.\n1.USA\n2.china.\n3.israel.\n4.britain.\n5.france.\n6.north korea\n7.russia\n8.finland\n9.australia\n10japan.
235628
Most countries i believe have the technology. Its actually about producing it. I believe our government and the UN have treaties about the amount of nuclear power to have for each countries.
533503
It's ridiculous that one country would assume it has the right to tell another country not to produce or have the same weapons it has. I don't understand why any of the people concerned are so stupid: I mean, if anyone ever did decide to deploy nuclear weapons, we'd ALL die...
1078530
North Korea being a communist state is supplied with equipment from Russia. Sure they have the Mig 25s and the T-72 battle tanks and a small Navy. The country touts its nuclear capability so it can get foriegn aid. They are a desolite country and see how well the south is doing and want that too. The military is run by its dicator and have quite a large army. They are held somewhat in check by the S.Koreans and the US Army at the 38 paralell.
962440
U.S.A., France\n\nNot- Horth Korea, Cuba
597031
Given the current political and military capabilites of both countries, I would say Iran.\n\nThis is why:\n\n~The United States military is very stretched due to deployments in afganistan and iraq.\n~The United States government has very limited global support, especially from Russia and China (who have economic ties to Iran)\n~Iran supports the powerful terrorist network Hezbollah (which can cordinate strikes against Oil Freights and Rigs)\n~Iran has a larger regional military capability (Russian, Chinese, and North Korean missle systems capable of hittin target as far as Europe)\n~United States is on the verge of an economic crisis due to increase in oil prices and a weaker dollar (compared to the euro and yen), meanwhile Iran has no such energy shortage.\n\nIf you consider other military conflicts of the two countries it is obvious who would win in a war - Iran.\n\nAmerican soldiers fear death, in contrast to Iranian soldiers and militia whom believe their death is equal to martyrdom. Oh and not to mention that the majority of the American people are against armed conflict with Iran.\n\nI hope this answers your question.