Every one says that God can do every thing but some one says that there is something which God can not do ?
367974
Yes - God cannot sin.
872431
No, I don't agree with you. People can do whatever they want.  God doesn't exit.
566564
the basic premise of the question is in itself wrong, GOD aint everyone and everything, it is a part of him in each one of us and in things around us.\n\nso clearly a part cannot equal the whole entity, hence our pea brains as compared to HIS all encompassing knowledgeable self. \n\nso the situation you described is justified.\n\nas simple as that dear.
1013292
There are two ways to answer this.\n\n1. If God is all powerful, then there is nothing he can't destroy. To create something like this would be logically impossible, so he can't do it.\n\nIf you think an all-powerful God should be able to do even the logically impossible go to the second answer:\n\n2. Yes, God can create something so indestructible that even he cannot destroy it. Then he can destroy it.
32139
God loves everyone no matter what religion they are, no matter what sin they commit, no matter what. thats who He is.
930388
it is possible for anything if Allah wills it.
618485
why would god have rules on himself?\n\nGod does as He wishes and no one can put restrictions on His power...at least that is what i believe... i mean, if you believe in God, who else is greater than Himself? no one, so only He controls what he does...therefore He doesn't need rules to control that which cannot be controlled in anyway
67790
I dont believe that there are things that where never ment to happen cause that would mean that God screwed up and God dont make mistakes... ppl make mistakes. God allows things to happen for a reason... thats to teach us and to help us to follow him. God had everything planned before we where even here... At least thats what i believe
930244
Lord Krishna says every one can do that, if one can work on it sincerely. So, I guess you can do that if sincerely tried.
1019353
What man can't do, God can. He can do anything, He is God.\n\nMan, can't get into Heaven by himself. Because we are not clean enough. But God can make us clean enough.
14350
God has given everyone free will, and people can make choices. Most times than not, those choices will affect other people. He made the world to work a certain way, and he doesn't intercede every time someone makes a choice, because he gave you that choice.  And some people choose to hurt others. But we all answer for our actions, in one way or another-ALWAYS.
784211
If things were impossible for God, He wouldn't be God.\n\nNow people will turn a question like this into something that would test God (i.e. the famous "if God can do anything, can He create a rock so big He couldn't move it?").  The answer lies in the fact that while He *can* do anything and *nothing* is impossible with Him, he would not do something that contradicts His very nature and being because He is perfect.
368222
That is like asking if he can create a wall that he can not destroy. And if He choose to make a mistake, then is it a mistake? Any time the question is "Can God..." then the answer is going to be an uneducated guess. We don't know.\n\nNow if the question was, does God make mistakes?, then the answer is no. He is the only being that is perfect and infallible. \n\nMost peoples answers to this question says more about themseleves then it does God. Our opinion of God does not effect Him, but it does effect our life and our existence after this life is over.
925663
There are some interesting verses in the bible.  God says these things:  "I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will harden the hearts of those also whom I choose".  God also likens Himself to a potter, and we are the clay.  He speaks of how He, as God...has the right to choose what to do with that clay.  I don't know why certain people are found of God and certain others are not.  But there is one thing I believe with all my heart:  that God is perfectly just, righteous and holy.  So I do not give up my faith in Him for those things I do not understand.
1048119
God is soveriegn, and everything that happens is according to His will. Sometimes God even has to allow bad things to happen to make people turn to him or to help people trust in Him.
586323
God can do the best things to you and the worse.  Nothing compares.  Think about it.
158827
This question should be banned.  I see it all to often, but here is my answer anyway.  I hope it helps.\n\nGod and Omnipotence\nThe paradox of the stone, as presented by Wade Savage:\n1. Either God can create a stone that God cannot lift, or God cannot create a stone that God cannot lift – there are no other possibilities. \n2. If God can create a stone that God cannot lift, then there is at least one thing that God cannot do (i.e., lift that stone). \n3. If God cannot create a stone that God cannot lift, then there is at least one thing that God cannot do (i.e., create that stone). \n4. From the combination of 1, 2 and 3, it follows that there is at least one thing that God cannot do. \n5. If God is omnipotent, then God can do anything. \n6. Therefore, God is not omnipotent. \n\nWhat this argument apparently shows is that omnipotence is impossible (or, that the notion of omnipotence is incoherent). Thus, God cannot be omnipotent (as nothing can be).\n\nSuggested solutions to the paradox St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274):\nAquinas defines as “absolutely impossible” any thing where the “predicate is altogether incompatible with the subject” (his example: “man is an ***” (in the non-metaphorical sense)). With this in mind:\nWhatever implies contradiction does not come within the scope of divine omnipotence, because it cannot have the aspect of possibility. Hence it is more appropriate to say that such things cannot be done, than that God cannot do them.\n\nThat is, to be omnipotent involves being able to do all things that are possible. For example, it is not considered a limit to my powers that I cannot draw a square circle. That’s impossible, so it’s no failing that I can’t do it – it cannot be done.\n\nBUT: surely I can make a thing that is too heavy for me to lift, so that task is not impossible, so if God can’t do it, that really is a limit to his power.\n\nGeorge Mavrodes (1926-):\nMavrodes responds that although “a stone too heavy for Simon Cushing to lift” is not a contradictory notion, “a stone too heavy for an omnipotent being to lift” is a contradictory notion.\nMavrodes’s argument in full:\n1. Either God is omnipotent or he is not. \n2. If God is not omnipotent, then the fact that he cannot do something (either make or lift the stone) is unsurprising. \n3. If God is omnipotent, then, by definition, there necessarily cannot be a stone that is too heavy for him to lift (otherwise he would not be omnipotent). \n4. If there necessarily cannot be such a stone, then it is an impossibility. \n5. By Aquinas’s reasoning, even an omnipotent being cannot perform impossibilities. \n6. Therefore, by definition, inability to create a stone too heavy for one to lift is no barrier to being omnipotent. (In fact, only non-omnipotent beings can create objects too heavy for themselves to lift.) \n\nBUT: both Aquinas and Mavrodes assume that God cannot do impossible things. Is this right? Descartes, for one, thought not. Descartes believed God could make 2+2=5. Why? Because otherwise you are suggesting that God is bound by the laws of logic. But if God created the laws of logic, why should he be bound by them? Couldn’t he have made them differently?\n\nHarry Frankfurt:\nHowever, if we assume that God can do impossible things, then God can create a stone too heavy for him to lift (which is supposedly impossible). Furthermore, if he can do that, then he can go one stage further and lift that stone (also impossible – but what’s the difference between doing one impossible thing and doing two?) \nBUT: doesn’t that mean that the stone he created was not a stone too heavy for him to lift, and that we’re back to the situation of him being unable to create such a stone? Not according to Frankfurt:\nIf an omnipotent being can do what is logically impossible, then he can not only create situations which he cannot handle but also, since he is not bound by the limits of consistency, he can handle situations