1-the Italian ……………..in Italy .(A:live / B:are living)?
363778
A, although it sounds awkward to me. I would say, "Italian people live in Italy" or "Italians live in Italy" or something like that.
11183
is italian for: (you) understand/understood?
485191
The first one would be better if you said "I have seen that movie ten times already."\nOr, if you prefer, you could say "I have watched/seen that movie ten times."\n\nThe second would be better if you said "I lived in China for five years."\n\nIf you STILL live in China you would need to say "I have been living in China for five years."
208284
Ma ---> (Ma)yonaize\ng-->(w)ill\nei-->(i)mmortal\nri-->(ri)ta\nco-->(co)cain\npho-->(fo)to\nbia-->(via)l
622864
I think he means "living"\n\nDespite the cost of living, _living_ remains popular.\n\nSounds like a case of wit to me... a foreign language not spoken by the yahoo answers crowd...
389370
it depends on how many people you're speaking to:\n\n"Benvenuto in Italia" for one person, or\n\n"Benvenuti in Italia" for two or more people.\n\nHope that helps!!
1080049
1. near\n2. During\n3. at
580539
1.) Also I have...  or I also have...\n2.) In my house there is/are...
538319
A -> B\nB -> C\n...\nT -> U\nYou (U) -> V\nV -> W\n\nSo, You -> V
1104452
Hello I like cats and dogs. I have a house in the countryside with a big garden. Well, bye.\n\nNow I'll traslate it in Italian, it is very similar\n\nCiao mi piacciono i gatti e i cani. Ho una casa in campagna con un grande giardino. Bene, ciao.
630476
Grammatically they are both correct.  #2 sounds more natural.  My only source is my Sprachgefühl (feel for language)
174593
a) soccer\nb) lasagna\nc) Maria Luise Auer\n\nI hope this was helpful!!
96996
IS:\nVERB: \nThird person singular present indicative of be.\n\nBE:\nVERB: \nFirst and third person singular past indicative was   (wz, wz; wz when unstressed) KEY  , second person singular and plural and first and third person plural past indicative were   (wûr) KEY  , past subjunctive were , past participle been   (bn) KEY  , present participle be·ing   (bng) KEY  , first person singular present indicative am   (m) KEY  , second person singular and plural and first and third person plural present indicative are   (är) KEY  , third person singular present indicative is   (z) KEY  , present subjunctive be \nVERB: \nintr. \n\nTo exist in actuality; have life or reality: I think, therefore I am. \n\nTo occupy a specified position: The food is on the table. \nTo remain in a certain state or situation undisturbed, untouched, or unmolested: Let the children be. \nTo take place; occur: The test was yesterday. \nTo go or come: Have you ever been to Italy? Have you been home recently? \nUsed as a copula in such senses as:\nTo equal in identity: "To be a Christian was to be a Roman" (James Bryce). \nTo have a specified significance: A is excellent, C is passing. Let n be the unknown quantity. \nTo belong to a specified class or group: The human being is a primate. \nTo have or show a specified quality or characteristic: She is witty. All humans are mortal. \nTo seem to consist or be made of: The yard is all snow. He is all bluff and no bite. \nTo belong; befall: Peace be unto you. Woe is me. \nVERB: \naux. \n\nUsed with the past participle of a transitive verb to form the passive voice: The mayoral election is held annually. \nUsed with the present participle of a verb to express a continuing action: We are working to improve housing conditions. \nUsed with the infinitive of a verb to express intention, obligation, or future action: She was to call before she left. You are to make the necessary changes. \nArchaic Used with the past participle of certain intransitive verbs to form the perfect tense: "Where be those roses gone which sweetened so our eyes?" (Philip Sidney). \n\n--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\nETYMOLOGY: \nMiddle English ben, from Old English bon; see bheu- in Indo-European roots. See am 1 is , etc. for links to other Indo-European roots \nUsage Note: \nTraditional grammar requires the nominative form of the pronoun in the predicate of the verb be: It is I (not me); That must be they (not them), and so forth. Nearly every speaker of Modern English finds this rule difficult to follow. Even if everyone could follow it, in informal contexts the nominative pronoun often sounds pedantic and even ridiculous, especially when the verb is contracted, as in It's we. But constructions like It is me have been condemned in the classroom and in writing handbooks for so long that there seems little likelihood that they will ever be entirely acceptable in formal writing.·The traditional rule creates additional problems when the pronoun following be also functions as the object of a verb or preposition in a relative clause, as in It is not them/they that we have in mind when we talk about "crime in the streets" nowadays, where the plural pronoun serves as both the predicate of is and the object of have. In this example, 57 percent of the Usage Panel prefers the nominative form they, 33 percent prefer the objective them, and 10 percent accept both versions. Writers can usually revise their sentences to avoid this problem: They are not the ones we have in mind, We have someone else in mind, and so on. See Usage Notes at I 1, we.\nOur Living Language In place of the inflected forms of be, such as is and are, used in Standard English, African American Vernacular English (AAVE) and some varieties of Southern American English may use zero copula or an invariant be, as in He be working, instead of the Standard English He is usually working. As an identifying f
673488
They have 3:\n\nOrigin  \nFallen\nAnywhere But Home [live]
954273
both one is singular, the other plural\n\n:> peace\n.
935532
in a restaurant or \nat a restaurant\n\nboth are fine\n\nin a hotel\nat a hotel\n\nboth are fine
196307
- not the belief\n- live\n- and the day news\n---------------