What do you think about John F. Kennedy assassination?
371600
I Think It Was A Shame. We Will Never No The Whole Truth. JFK Is The Only One That New What Happend.
45163
Actually nobody knows who did it.\n\nThe Conspiracy...\n\nThe Conspiracy\n\nDealey Plaza\n\nWhat about those witnesses? Didn't everyone hear shots from the Grassy Knoll? What about the Tague wounding? Who was the "Umbrella Man?" Was the rifle recovered really a Mauser? Does "acoustic evidence" show a shot from the Grassy Knoll? Were the Three Tramps suspicious? How could Kennedy's head go "back and to the left?" \n\nThe Single Bullet Theory\n\nYou've seen Kevin Costner give the conspiracy version of the Single Bullet theory. You know: Connally seated directly in front of Kennedy, at the same height, and facing straight ahead. Was that really what happened? \n\nLee Harvey Oswald\n\nWhat sort of person was he? Did he really have "Top Secret" security clearance? Did he shoot at General Walker? Were there two Oswalds? If Oswald shot Kennedy, what was his motive? Was the man exhumed in 1981 really somebody besides Oswald? \n\nJim Garrison and New Orleans\n\nDid Oswald really share an office with Guy Banister? Did Clay Shaw really use the alias "Clay Bertrand?" Why did Oliver Stone make a movie about the Shaw trial and not even mention Perry Raymond Russo? Did David Ferrie die a "mysterious death?" What about Jim Garrison and the Mafia? \n\nMedical Evidence\n\nDid the bullet that hit Kennedy in the back penetrate only an inch and fall out? Was Kennedy hit in the head by a bullet from in front? Are the autopsy photos and x-rays faked? Did all the doctors at Parkland Hospital believe that Kennedy was hit in the front of the neck, and if so, are their opinions decisive evidence that that is what happened? Was the back of Kennedy's head blown out? Are the autopsy photos faked? \n\nBogus Evidence\n\nDid you know that all the evidence in this case proven to be forged has been on the conspiracy side? One key piece originated with the KGB! Did you know that the "mysterious deaths" are virtually all not so "mysterious" when you look at them closely? Do you trust authors like Mark Lane to tell you the truth about what witnesses said? \n\nJack Ruby\n\nThe "lone nut" theory of the assassination is really the "two lone nuts" theory. What sort of person was Jack Ruby? A mobster? An intelligence agent? A small-time hustler? The sort of volatile character who might really have shot Oswald out of righteous anger? \n\nOliver Stone's Movie "JFK"\n\nWe expect Hollywood movies to take some liberties with the historical record. But what do we think when Hollywood turns history on its head? Oliver Stone wants to overturn the verdict in the Clay Shaw trial. The jury found that District Attorney Jim Garrison had no case — so Stone invents a case on celluloid. Just how honest was Oliver Stone, Shaw's Hollywood prosecutor? \n\nJohn Kennedy: Liberal Martyr?\n\nFor some in the conspiracy crowd, John Kennedy was a liberal saint, who was going to implement policies that would bring America into a new Utopia. So, of course, a threatened Power Elite had to kill him. Was Kennedy the kind of left liberal who threatened established interests? Was he a hero of Civil Rights? Had he decided to pull out of Vietnam? Historian Eric Paddon dissects these claims in a series of essays based on his posts on the Internet. \n\nAssassination Logic\n\nSome notions about logic, probability and statistics necessarily underlie all discussion of "conspiracy" or "lone assassin." Does the lone assassination theory involve too many implausible "coincidences?" Are there a suspicious number of "connections" between various figures in the case? Is the Single Bullet Theory highly "improbable?" \nAssassination Witnesses\nIt writings about the assassination, as in real-world criminal justice, witness testimony looms large. But just how reliable are the witnesses? How many witnesses are just flat out telling tall
987171
When John Kennedy got assasinated. I was a small boy and I couldn't believe it could happen to our President.
1131126
JFK would have, had he not been assassinated.\nOtherwise...who cares as long as Bush no longer has another family member run for office.
1092730
The CIA had an opening for an assassin. After all of the background checks, interviews, and testing were done there were three finalists...Two men and a woman. \n\nFor the final test, the CIA agents took one of the men to a large metal door and handed him a gun. "We must know that you will follow your \ninstructions, no matter what the circumstances. Inside of this room, you will find your wife sitting in a chair. Kill Her!!!" The man said, "You can't be serious. I could never shoot my wife." The agent said, "Then you're not the right man for this job." \nThe second man was given the same instructions. He took the gun and went into the room. All was quiet for about five minutes. Then the man came out with tears in his eyes." I tried, but I can't kill my wife." The agent said, "You don't have what it takes. Take your wife and go home." \n\nFinally, it was the woman's turn. She was given the same instructions, to kill her husband. She took the gun and went into the room. Shots were heard, \none shot after another. They heard screaming, crashing, banging on the walls. \n\nAfter a few minutes, all was quiet. The door opened slowly and there stood the woman. She wiped the sweat from her brow, and said, "This gun is loaded with blanks. I had to beat him to death with the chair." \n\nMoral: Women are evil. Don't mess with them
98070
Since you used the word "accidentally", then it IS an accident. I noticed you keep asking about various people being shot by the Vice President. It doesn't matter who they are...get over it!!!! It was an accident. I would rather go hunting with Chaney then riding with Kennedy...you may be too young to remember that a woman drowned to death while T. Kennedy was driving under the influence of alochol and HE didn't report it til days later.....look it up....Chappaquidick, Mass...
1141193
It's possible.  He was shot before he could be questioned by police, but when he was arrested he screamed "I am just a patsy".  So I guess it could be a part of the conspiracy to keep the real murderer a secret.\n\n\nWe're talking about the shooting of Oswald, not the shooting of JFK, right?
138939
Castro assasinated JFK using Oswald, in retaliation for JFK trying to kill Castro via the Mob.  Oswald met with Cuban agents in Mexico City prior his day in Dallas.  Castro became aware of Oswald via KGB agents who became familiar with him while he lived in Russia.  The FBI tried to follow up on the Cuban connection during the Warren Commission investigation but were recalled by Central DC office for unknown reasons, and the leads were never fully investigated.  A recent documentary attempted to interview the alleged Cuban agent but his response only added to the idea that Cuba was behind the whole incident.\n\nArea 51 was where the Stealth fighters/bombers were first tested.  Most likely spot where alien ships may have been reversed engineered, but only rumors at this point.  In any event the site is highly classified.  The ground sensors around the base bring immediate response by armed military with orders to shoot to kill.
492939
Boy did you open a can of worms!\n\nThe Kennedy assassination is one of the favorite of conspiracy theorist (notice I did not say nut cases).  The theories range from LBJ (totally assinine) to the Mafia (more belivable).  They also include Cubans (espcially with Oswalds connections), the CIA (no one ever asked why, they just say the CIA did it), to just some nutcase (it may be true, but can you prove it).\n\nThe real reason will probably never be discovered, but as long as people ask questions, that will be one that will be asked.
1001373
According to the Warren Commission, Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated John F. Kennedy.  Unless there is proof someone else committed the crime, Oswald is the most likely suspect to have assassinated Kennedy.
534562
depends on which bullet hit him ,not through the back, but the one that went through Governor O'Connelly's leg, ricocheted back behind the limo and made a u-turn into JFK's skull. Eye witness testimony have 2 women who said they saw a railroad-uniformed worker put a rifle case on the RR control box next to the RR tracks just behind the hedges on the famous grassy knoll and watched a man in a suite they thought was secret service assemble the rifle and shoot over the hedges and put the gun back in the case at which the man in the RR uniformed removed his coveralls and walked away with the gun. Much speculation. LBJ (V.P.) was known for his bitter contempt for JFK and was quoted at a party the night before that we wouldn't have to deal with that S.O.B after tomorrow. The Warren commission states a single gunman but eye wittiness' state otherwise. The History channel did a week long special in 2003 ( the 40th anniversary of his assassination ) and mater of factly said there were two or three gunmen. I think most people think it was an inside job.
257120
Mysterious assassination of JFK\n\nWatergate\n\nIrangate
117025
I think it is another biased movie that the makers want to try and push a conspiracy. You can look at any of the facts out there, and twist them any way you want to prove your theory. If I had the time and money, I could put together a movie proving that JFK is still alive and caused the attack on the WTC.
281289
Lee Harvey Oswald. I know there are tons of conspiracy theories, but the Warren Commision conclusively proved the Magic Bullet Theory, and the Secret Service has replicated the exact shot taken perfectly countless times. \n\nThe Magic Bullet theory basically matches the amount of shots heard and casings found against the bullet wounds in JFK and the man riding next to him. There were more bullet wounds in the two men and in the car then there were shots fired, which is grounds for wild speculation, but the Warren Commision, the USSS, and other private ballistics scientists have shown that the bullets richocheted at a certain angle, causing the damage to occur.\n\nMost of the evidence against the Magic Bullet Theory is not enough to prove anything: all of it is from "eye witnesses", who saw puffs of smoke from tufts of grass and heard gunshots away from the Texas Book Depository where JFK was shot. However, if an assasinan like Carlos Sanchez "The Jackal" really did kill JFK, he would have used a rifle that fired a smokeless round. Professionals do not leave traces.\n\nWhat's more, eyewitnesses rarely are even accepted as concrete evidence in any court of law nowadays. In trials involving armed robberies gone wrong, where a store keeper is shot twice, eyewitnesses often report there being several shots, despite clear surveillance camera footage. The problem with human minds is that we invent things subconciously, or we forget things and invent details.\n\nIt was Lee Harvey Oswald that shot the President.
134539
Frankly I was not aware of this till now. But I did some 1 hour research for you question and here is what I found out.\n\nKennedy used "Castro-Card" to defeat Nixon as the Cold War was in full force. But he was unaware that the CIA had all planned and was more than happy to have the hawkish Kennedy to get elected.\n\nApparently Kennedy developed cold feet and tried to avoid "US Involvement" and did some utterly stupid changes to the plan which nothing but doomed the invasion. Its the worst fiasco to hit the Kennedy Administration.\n\nHere are some links with more material for your essay. If possible buy/rent that book "Decision for Disaster: Betrayal at the Bay of Pigs ". You will blow your peers' essays with your explosive view points...\n\nAll the Best. Please do message me as how you did and what score it fetched to you..\n\n.:Fishie:.
15533
This link here should help you\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_assassination_theories
220678
the lone gunman theory is a crock.  there's no way that all those shots, from all those angles came in 6 seconds.  \n\nphysicists have shown it to be scientifically impossible.  the blows to jfk's body can be seen to come from different directions, right there on the videotape.  \n\nthere's a lot of people who wanted jfk dead, so the investigation has been cloudy.\n\nwhat is interesting however, is that when Oswald was arrested, there was NO INTERROGATION.  They didn't make a record, record a transcript, or make notes of ANYTHING they did with him.\n\nHe was in custody for a few hours, then he conviently gets murdered before he can talk, and give information to anybody.