Did you know that Jesus Christ is just a myth?
375207
"There is actually quite a bit of written history from that time period that proves he did exist. But thanks for playing anyways."\n\nHAHAHAHAHAHA.... prove it. Show me one single piece of paper and I will believe you. The fact of the matter is, there was NO record of a historical jesus. In fact, St. Paul (who recorded the very first story of "Jesus") didnt mention anything about a virgin birth, miracles, or even this plane of exsistance. It was set in the same relm as Zeus, Hera, and other fictional characters. There are no writings from ANYONE who supposedly followed "jesus". If you know of any first hand evidence, I will gladly look at it and convert my faith if its true. So heres your big chance, all you good christians out there... In fact, Im gonna make it a new topic.
130356
duped by propaganda & blind adhereance to myth. http://www.philipdru.com/gatto_stream.html \nhttp://www.philipdru.com/taylor_stream.html
842796
Well, there was David Friedrich Strauss, but as far as I can find he only claimed that Jesus was not divine. I'll keep searching and see if there was another who went further.
1388
The fact that a man named Jesus, from Nazareth was crucified under a Roman ruler named Pontius Pilot is one of the best attested to facts in ancient history.  \n\nReligious historians - such as Luke, the doctor, who's testment can be read in any commonly circulated version of the Christian Bible (The Gospel of Luke) -- as well as secular historians like the Roman historian Tactitus all agree on this fact.  They differ in how they choose to understand Jesus' death on the cross -- where a religous historian like Luke would say that Jesus was the "messiah" (the Christ, of Jewish Prophesy) and the son of God, Tacitus, refers to him simply as a nussaince and the originator of a "mischevious superstition".  \n\nSee below for more info.
648908
I think they believe in the existence of Christ, but do not believe He is/was the Messiah.  But He is!
300459
Jesus is the repeated story of, Osirus and Horus which 30.000 before ,already was a symbolic story of the movements of celestrial bodies ,that were given characters and gender  in order to pass on the story more easily to the people.\n\nthe names are changed for different cultures and indifferent times but the formula of the story ;of one plus twelve ,and one into three.has always remained the same.\nJESUS represents the sun (halo)the twelve disciples or iluminati represent the stars(light,halo)\n\nAnd all One God religions are ofshoots of sun worship ,as it being the Father of all life.\n\nChristians and Muslims rather die than admit that in effect they are a ofshoot pagan cultures .\n\nOver the milliniums their symbolic stories with their  characters have become real people or godlike people \n\nTo dispute that or take that away would shatter their faith and leave them even more confused than they already are.\n\nIn desperation they cling to biblical quotations and stories of suposedly other ,real ,objective writers in the past as writing additional true accounts of these peoples existance.\n\nin fact apart from the bible there is practically no evidence that most of the biblical figures were no more than fiction.\n\nsome people mentioned did exist,the best way to tell a lie is by lacing it with truths.\n\nThe church in its quest for power has done everything to  protect and enhance the Myth ,making it real and adding details .Because all of their money , political power and control ,stems from this.\n\nmost of this was done many years after the alledged birth of Christ and if you check out which people confirm the Myth you will see that they were people belonging to the same power structure that benefitted by the control,including people like --Plato ,Socratus,Leonardi da vinci.Aristolle ,Pythagarus to name but a few
1178497
Not only a myth, but a really, really dumb one....
1123273
Actually that's a myth.  \nSorry.
322372
It is the absolute Truth. Everything discussed in the book is Undeniable Fact. The Church has stolen the Truth from the people for too long! Jesus is the male part of a duality that involves Mary Magdelene.
1112250
Have you told him about Christ and everything he's done in your life? Don't worry so much about his religion - only Jesus offers eternal life.
1008625
We are saying that the story of Jesus was probably embellished alot down the line. Perhaps he did not claim to be the son of god, maybe he was just a prophet or political activist who gained people's admiration - and ended up being persecuted by the politicians of the time for spreading his political message.
283366
I'm not sure which I find more hliarious, that Patzy calls your article, "bullshit facts" yet there isn't a damn thing to prove God exists that isn't strung together inconsitencies and things that are unexplainable, or the fact that MommaToldMeNotToCome has no ability to read the article and see when the article you posted in fact written.  Fact is, no one should be calling anyone elses beliefs bullshit.  \n\nAs for your question, it could be.  There is no way to tell.  Lots of people were crucified at that time and what happened to Jesus wasn't special.  He was one of many.  \n\nAnd Susenjungle, the Shroud of Turin wasn't used by mary Magdelen to wipe Jesus face, it was what was laid over his body after the crucifiction and due to the oils the body secretes during the ordeal made an stain of his face and body on it.  I have some good books on the subject if you are interested, let me know!  I love sharing books!
1018802
the bible is just plagiarized myths from older myths
1015332
No one really knows.\n\nThere is no credible evidence to support the claim.\n\n\n"While some historians consider Jesus to largely be a mythological and legendary entity, (Jesus freaks claim he exists)"\n\nSource: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
742238
a myth is a great maybe. a legend is a great truth. not bad. i made that up myself. feel free to use people.
591525
Grrrrrrrrrrrr! christian mythology is a "myth" and evolution is real. no comparison
755139
That's funny, I remember Jesus saying repeatedly that he was NOT the son of God. He said he was the Son of Man. He claimed God was his father, but not necessarily in the biological sense, and he didn't claim any special relationship.\n\nBut regardless, the bible is a collection of mythology. Believe it if it makes you happy, but don't pretend there's some kind of proof that you're right and everyone else is wrong. All your logic is circular - the Bible proves Christ's divinity, and we know the Bible is accurate because Christ said so, and he's divine.