what did you think of the movie "dogma" by kevin smith? like it, dislike it? why?
375101
I enjoyed it. Anything that takes itself too seriously deserves to be put up to ridicule, and that includes the Church.\n\nBesides that, the jokes were funny and well-timed, the plot was coherent within its own setting, the casting was perfect enough that I couldn't see anyone else playing the parts (especially Linda Fiorentino and Alan Rickman), and the cynicism toed the line between mockery and adoration.
451954
one of the greastest movies. it is a classic. it is a movie that will never go away. i love this part....\nstupid worthless no good g$d damn freeloading son of a \nb$%^h. retar$$% a$$hole know it all jerk....and it goes on and on...
97286
Are you refering to the first?  I personally thought it was a great movie.  Parts of it were kinda boring, but I loved the ending.  I think what I liked the most though was the moral message behind the movie.
378331
I Give It A ****4 STARS out of 5\n\n"There is no coincidence, only the illusion of coincidence," gravely says the masked hero of "V for Vendetta" half way through the film. \n\nIt is certainly no coincidence that a film written and produced by Andy and Larry Wachowski of "The Matrix" would feature such dialogue, along with a few impressive action sequences, spectacular pyrotechnics and an always-adept Hugo Weaving. That much is par for the course. \n\nBut the film is notable for the questions it raises. Is it coincidence that the flag for a futuristic London bears a symbol reminiscent of the swastika? That the aforementioned hero – the concisely named V – is, in fact, a terrorist? Or that characters in the film draw noticeable parallels to Western politicians? \n\nUnlike other recent comic-book-based movies, "V for Vendetta" is a political thriller of science-fiction proportions. Set in 2020 in a totalitarian England, rooted in over-the-top commentary of Western government and riddled with visual metaphors, "Vendetta" is successfully both action-packed and politically confrontational. \n\nBased on the graphic novel created by Alan Moore and David Lloyd, the film begins and ends with the Nov. 5 fireworks celebration of Guy Fawkes Day. Fawkes, a Catholic conspirator who tried to blow up Parliament in 1605 and was eventually hanged, serves as an ongoing symbol throughout the film and an inspiration for V and his deeds. \n\nThe plot follows the masked murderer as he skillfully and systematically avenges what we learn is a painful personal history in a neofascist state of Big-Brother-like laws run by Chancellor Adam Sutler (John Hurt). And though V's vendetta against his society is innately personal, it becomes one of universal importance, first enthralling the strong-minded Evey (Natalie Portman) and eventually the entire city. \n\nEven as his face is hidden by the mask's disturbing smile, Weaving ("The Lord of the Rings," "The Matrix") plays V convincingly. His rich and charismatic voice conveys an interplay of sarcastic wit and gleeful malevolence. The actor's background in stage drama undoubtedly informs the theatrical movements of a man who views society as his own personal stage. \n\nThough Portman loses her flowing locks halfway through the film, her performance only gains intensity. Her English accent isn't faultless, but she continues her knack of emerging as the heart of her films. \n\nDespite these performances and a remarkably intelligent script, "Vendetta" is mostly devoid of human emotion. The story may be character-based, but London 2020 is conspicuously inhuman. Giant speakers line the streets announcing the nightly curfew. Television, more than human contact, is the most prominent method of communication. Any controversial, multifaceted remnants of human history have been banned – anyone who owns an African statue or a copy of the Koran is a sinner at best. \n\nThus, though it carefully investigates issues of morality, tyranny and individuality and sometimes delves into the personal and painful histories of its characters, the film does not elicit emotional reaction until its climax, when the anxiety building throughout the film is suddenly and finally relieved. \n\nUltimately, given a powerfully fitting musical score by Dario Marianelli ("Pride and Prejudice"), vibrant cinematography by the late Adrian Biddle ("Aliens" & "The Mummy") and a restrained downplay of special effects, "V for Vendetta" is downright strange – quietly discomforting, yet refreshingly provocative.
104344
This is one of my favorite movies!\nI was speachless and depressed for a couple of days after I watched it.
1058217
Loved It!!\nI wouldn't want to have 18 kids to raise, but I loved the movie.\nBetter them than me, I say, LOL.
653757
Yeah i saw it! But i don't know what you're looking for exactly, a review?!! summary?!! or what? So i'm just gonnna tell you what i thought of it .. \nIt was a nice experience because its not like every other romantic comedy we usually see, the story is weird in a way which is what made the movie interesting, a bit funny, and gives a different perspective on love and marriage ...
265401
I saw it on Friday. It was a bit strange and far fetched in places but generally I thought it was really interesting and profound. My boyfriend didn't like it though. He thought it was a load of crap!
364838
It's pretty good. The story isn't that great, and if you aren't a fan of Cloud then there isn't much in this movie for you, but the action is pretty amazing.\n\nI recommend it.
687205
I really liked it though. I don't think it was really meant to be "scary". Just made me think of life. Of course I thought that guy was sick, but you know. Like he said, he didn't kill them, they killed themselves and each other. \nI liked the second better than the first. More people I guess, and that twist at the end. It was cool.
278084
It's a well made movie, as most of Spielberg movies are.  I truly was thinking it was going to be a Jew sympathizing movie, but was pleasantly surprised that Munich gave both sides of the issue.  Arabs kill Jews, Jews kill Arabs because they kill Jews, and the cycle continues upon itself.\n\nI won't ruin the ending if you haven't seen it, but it is a psycghological portrail of a man torn between what felt was right and how he feels after his journey.\n\nShould be an Oscar winner!
341907
I liked the movie, but it wasn't as original as the first three films. My favorite so far is the second movie. The movie mostly spoofs War of the Worlds and the Grudge. The movie leastly spoofs Saw, Saw II, Red Eye, The Village, and Million Dollar Baby. \n\nHope you like it!
34652
I saw it when it was first released in theaters and I wish that I would've waited until it came on t.v. I was very disappointed. The music was great and so was the actors, but overall I didn't see the point of the movie. It just seemed like a infommercial for church. Sorry, but I felt someone should've put more thought into the plot of the movie.
1142083
I liked it...you just have to ignore all the obvious things like his perfect hair, and his perfect suit that never gets damaged no matter how many times it gets burned by fire or shot by bullets.\n\nIDK...Superman is the best! What can you say against him?\n\nThey can't add bad hygiene to his weakness list, or else it might over shadow the fact that Kryptonite is the only thing that can kill the great Superman!\n\nLOL!!! \n\nEhhh...give the guy a break! He has to save the whole world for crying out loud! Give'm a little gratitude - throw him a bone! : D \n\nThe action was awesome along with the special effects!\n\nThe cinematography was impeccable!\n\nKevin Spacey as Lex Luther was a genius!\n\nThey could have improved the storyline a bit, but it was ok!\n\nAwesome!\n\nTwo thumbs up! : D\n\nGo Superman!
965275
Great scary movie, those other people don't know what the helll their talking about.\nProbably never even saw the movie!!!\nI did, and it was great.
217310
I have watched this movie several times and to tell you the truth, I felt bad after every viewing.  Not bad in the "I shouldn't have watched this" way, but bad that I have a part in nailing Jesus to the cross, even today.  I actually cried when I first watched it, and I am not one of those people that cry at movies, but this was a moving experience for me.  \n\nThe movie was adapted from a book that a num wrote a couple of hundred years ago.  She had visions from Jesus about what the Passion was like, and was told all of this in great detail, including how many times He was whipped, and the crown of thorns and everything else.\n\nI haven't read the book, but am still looking for it, but I have heard, from people who have read it, that the movie is very close to what this nun had written.\n\nI don't think the movie was supposed to "bring people to Christianity", but was meant to show people how Jesus suffered.  I agree that something should have been done about the Resurection, since Passion referes to the crusifixtion, death and resurection, but I did kind of like the ending, showing Him walking out of the tomb.
992322
Loved the movie. I wish we had the "Eye for an Eye" punishment. Those punks deserve the same thing.\nI am a sraight grandmother of 9, have a gay brother & lots of gay friends. They are the most caring people in the world.