Iran Maintains Energy Program Is Peaceful?
362777
How did this get on a soccer catagory?
625577
Iran saying that they are enriching uranium for power generation. Security council should closely monitor the pace in which they are enriching. I dont think Iran has much power demand.\n\nyes its ok if the are using nuclear power for peaceful means & for their nations security. Because every nation has the right to protect themself.
111322
MAIN REASON JELOUSY.there is the decrease in the oil filds in the usa and europe is just folowing,so the point is that Iran is now very rich in both oil and the new unclear energy so the main thing is, it is going  be richer then the usa soon so they want to prevent this. Though they do not have any evedence thet Iran is making weapons useing un clear energy.Infect they should be happy to know that there is going to be other kinds of energy available other then oil.
36793
Iran, no need to question.
402581
It shouldn't be a first option.  The ideal situation would be an internal revolution in Iran, I can't imagine that the average Iranian is terribly happy with Ahmadinejad and Khamenei though the Iranian police state has so far been able to keep them in power.  I think that diplomatic options need to be exhausted before military options are exercised, but it is up to Iran how far this goes.  If they allow the IAEA in to monitor and verify their claim that they are trying to generate Nuclear power for civilian purposes (which all current evidence indicates is not the case) then the world will probably let them do so, however if Iran begins deploying and/or exporting Nuclear Weapons they will have to be stopped, and it would be imprudent to take any option off the table before their intentions are known.
187723
Yes but use it for peaceful purpose.\nPakistan
1130820
Iran is using oil to make electricity , atomic tech. is not only to make energy.we use atomic tech. for cancer,biotech,.... ... its a technology and every body should use it.\nwhen you hear about atomic energy you just think about atomic bomb !! israel is not a good nation untill they attack to other nations. iran is strong enough to control the area.they didnt attack to any body just other nation want to attack to iran becouse of oil and they see iran is improving and they can not see that.atomic tech. is an improvment for them.bbc&cnn,... are false,listen to reallity
129506
IRAN ALWAYS WANT PEACE
424885
Only under close supervision  by U.N. Inspectors to make sure the use is only for peaceful generating of electricity and not for making weapons to threaten others with.  Iran has proved to not be a good neighbor in the collective body of nations that inhabit this Earth and it is only right with statements they have made for us to be concerned that their intentions are not purely honorable.  They need to comply with the other nations of the world and prove that their intentions are honorable at which time I am sure that they would be allowed to continue their quest for alternate sources to generate electricity, however not unchecked.
497359
People above me who are blaming this on Bush, read a newspaper.  This is not a problem that President Bush is inventing.  The United Nations, the International Atomic Energy Agency, and Europe agree that this is a problem.  Open your eyes and stop blaming everything in the world on Bush.  The Iranian problem can be solved peacefully if the leadership of Iran will stop trying to get nuclear weapons.  They say that nothing will stop them from their nuclear programs.  If they don't change their minds, the problem will not be able to be solved peacefully.
233509
Does Iran have any oil? question is answered with a question but question is answered.
485984
Take it at 95%. The US, Britain, and France all are getting tough on the UN to stop Iran from its nuclear program. But as you know IRan is not listening and probably won't listen into they have obtained nuclear weapons.
371556
I'll have to assume that you are asking why the United States is pushing Iran to give up its nuclear program while we maintain one ourselves.\n\nFirst, the nuclear program of the United States does not violate international law. Our program follows conventions agreed to by numerous nations and treaties. Iran will not even open up its program for people to look at. Indeed, Iran denies that a nuclear weapons program exists.\n\nSecond, the United States has displayed six decades of responsible nuclear weapons handling. Iran has displayed nearly three decades of sponsoring terror across the world.\n\nThird, the United States embraces and protects democracy. Iran fails to even recognize them and vows to wipe them off the face of the earth.\n\nFourth, the United States is a nation of laws which, for the most part, get followed. They are written by men who have time to ponder the intent and impact of the laws being written. Iran is a fundamentalist Muslim state whose leaders rule according to whatever their twisted view of the Koran tells them to.\n\nHope that answers your question.\n\nHave a great day, Jock-o!  :-)
642572
nuclear program and ahmadinejad
1168694
Your question assumes that Iran has military ambitions with respect to the development of nuclear energy technology.  Either way (peaceful or military use), Iran is about 7 to 10 years away from even developing the capability to enrich enough material to develop a single nuclear weapon.\n\nIt seems much more critical to reign in the activities of nations the world over that have thousands of nuclear weapons (like the U.S., Europe, India, Pakistan, etc.), or nations wherein nuclear stockpiles are poorly secured (in Russia and former USSR states).  The latter is a far more dangerous threat with respect to potential terrorism.\n\nIn addition, all of this is predicated upon accepting "nuclear" as a reliable energy source.  The dangers of Chernobyl, Three Mile Island and the like, as well as the intractable problems of nuclear waste disposal and vulnerability of nuclear plants to terrorist threats make it crucial that the entire planet move away from "nuclear activities."
228413
Uranium is a radioactive metal. \n\nLast Updated: Tuesday, 14 February 2006, 18:02 GMT \n\n E-mail this to a friend Printable version\nIran urged to halt uranium work\n \nWestern powers suspect Iran's nuclear ambitions are not peaceful\nFrance and Russia have urged Iran to halt its uranium enrichment programme after Tehran confirmed on Tuesday it had resumed the work.\nThe French prime minister and Russian president issued a joint statement calling on Iran to conform in full with the demands of the UN's nuclear agency.\n\nIran on Tuesday confirmed it resumed small-scale uranium enrichment work at the Natanz plant last week.\n\nWestern nations suspect Iran is trying to build nuclear weapons.\n\nUranium enrichment is one part of that process. However, Tehran insists its nuclear programme is solely for peaceful purposes.
248178
A nuclear power station in Iran is not bad. However the 'fuel' (enriched uranium or plutonium) can be used for composing an atomic bomb. The politicians are afraid for that. So do I.