promoting competition is the best atrategy to acclerate industialisation discuss?
366476
Actually I think you're right. If you compete in such days like these where money is so valuable this will increase industrialization. More people will make stuff to get more money than any other person. They will try to invent new stuff and even try to create more of one huge invention. If you know what i mean. But basically that is the strategy to accelerate industrialization.
706337
sorry man i know you want real answer but really try to read strategys  for the biggest fast food restaurants\n\n\ni hope the best for you
1029888
There should be a difference in you and your employees. There should be some advances that are a factor in you being a leader from experience or from extra programs that helps you stand out and branch you higher from them. The competition should know of what needs to be known from only you. With dedication in our position and an elite sense of confidence that will keep you from thinking any uncertainty in rising to the top, you can become anything you want. If every man was equal in business there would not be a successful society.
763803
human nature to be competitive I think.
921579
Start by analysing the market in which you wish to enter (assuming a market already exists for the product) This will let you consider the problems you may encounter and always consider competition, if there is already someone providing your product/service can you deliver it better, more efficently etc...\n    Perhaps start with P.E.S.T analysis - this considers the following factors affecting the Market and your product/service - POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, TECHNOLOGICAL....consider the implications of these factors on your idea (e.g with selling an product that could be banned by the government in the future you could have a political problem).\n    Consider something called S.W.O.T analysis....Strengths, Weaknesses, Oppourtunities and Threats...this will look at the market in terms of your business and for you to consider your competitors in threats. Also consider you competitors strengths and weakness (can you compete and what oppourtunities does this present)\n    To further your understanding of the market and where a gap may exist why don't you try drawing something known as a perceptual map. It would have to axis and look much like a cross drawn on a page. To take an example of supermarkets the two axis may be labelled "quality of product's" and "cost" (Very basic examples, you can change these to fit your market) - You can then plot at various points on the graph where the various supermarkets sit. For example in my opinion (if the greatest quality is on the vertical axis at the top and lowest at bottom, whilst cost on the horizontal axis is greatest on the right and lowest on the left) Marks and Spencer may lie in the top right hand corner. Once you fill in all your competitors you may see a gap in the diagram (hopefully where your product/service could lye)
871724
This is purely based on demad vs supply concept.\nThere are many ways!\n\n1. Win them on what you are good at\n2. Show courage to learn new things\n3. Convince them to adapt yourself\n4. Genuine display of long term goals\n\nIf nothing works out.. use the ultimate threat in your current company that, you would resign.. Let me know if this doesn't work! All the best :)
449020
If you look at the marketing mix in ICT age you will find out that in win-win busineses some activities doesn't have a clear relationship with gain the capital or customer! Keep contact if you would like!
473031
Strategic HRM comes from the resource based view of strategic management.  This view holds that one company is advantaged over another by its preferential access to information and resources.  \n  OK, this aside, if one company has a big manufacturing facility, can't another one borrow and buy a big facility too? Answer is often "yes". which leads us to the idea that companies need to compete by acquiring knowledge and skill faster than the competition.\n  Here is where KRM comes in.  Companies need to both hire for a competitive advantage, meaning getting the employees for the best fit with the company's strategy, but they need to also 1)  develop these employees to fit the current needs, 2) develop these employees to support and facilitate the changes in the business environment of the organization, and 3)  need to keep these assets you just developed.
35699
Not in the short term and probably not in the long term either.  They may successful begin their project, but if it's a commercially viable market then others will move in quickly.  Usually the first company to enter a new sector is not the company which achieves the most success in that sector.
960514
Hi Ricardo,\n\nI think you need to look at the centralisation of the management structure and production processes.\n\nReduction in overheads.\n\nPossibly more effective inter-departmental lines of communication.\n\nEasier customer/supplier liason.\n\nPossible reduction in staff liabilities. (wages etc.)\n\nJust a few ideas to get you going. \nHope your studies are progressing well.\n\nGood luck
97381
"awesome" if its good work!\nrise in demand n suppy in the initial time period.....n then depending on other factors.....decline or consistent demand n suppy!
416153
It's not a way to improve competitiveness at all. It's a way for local companies to increase profit margins by importing cheaper inferior quality crap made in a Chinese sweat shop. It also causes an increase in foreign debt which isn't a good thing and it also costs local jobs.
137720
Not bad for a first attempt.\n\nDo a search for similar sites and get an idea of what your competition is doing.
786712
better to compare with other companies in  the industry. \n\nIn some industries you need large capital investments in equipment.
420365
Increase demand of product by advertisement.\n\nAnd ake sure you have more demand than supply.
637130
Compete with a colleague, or make dares.
227160
I work as a business coach for many entrepreneurs, and the one question I ask them when they're not sure about launching a business, is: "Are you ready to go to war in order to make your business succeed?"\n\nMany people will suggest advice of the kind "give it a shot, you never know." It's quite wrong advice, because launching a business is NOT easy. Unless you are committed 100% to make it work, it will not be a good idea to try. \n\n70% of new businesses fail within the first year, 90% within the first 3 years. The main reason people fail is that they underestimated the amount of business knowledge and training that they would need. \n\nBusiness is really war, especially if you're launching a NEW business (and not buying an existing, successful franchise). Only the most committed people, who have integrity, intelligence and an abundance of energy will ever succeed.\n\nHope this helps!