In the Bible it states that God is the creator, but who created God?
357321
So many people ask this question.  God is the Creator.  He is NOT part of the Creation.  He is the Creator.  He was not created.  He is GOD.  That's what makes Him God.  He has always been.  He is not subject to time.  Time was also something He created.  He is the alpha and omega, the beginning and the end.  He has no beginning or end.  He is GOD.  He is bigger, and smarter, and holier than we can even fathom.
1041513
God created the plants just like He created Adam and Eve and all the animals.\n\n"And God said, ":Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit...."
1185044
God is, he always is and always was, he was never born nor created. He just is. This is too hard of a concept for the human brain to understand but it is what the Bible explains it to be.
155380
Ha! finally a question i can actually answer and know 100%! In the beginning, God created the earth, along with the heavens. He said it, and it was done. Pretty sweet, eh? lol...he's pretty good, made it all, in the matter of 6 days...
1111274
well i believe that the creater is apart from the creation. Popular new age philosophy likes to think that everything is God. Yet, this goes against the Bible's teachings. Trust the Bible. peace.
601242
We were not created by chance.  God was lonely and need companionship so he created Adam.  The rest of us descend from Adam and Eve.
84971
You have to understand first that we are not on the same realm as God.  God is higher than us.  His ways and his thought are higher than ours.  We should never question anything that God has done\n\nAs for where God came from...God has always been.  It is hard for us to imagine this because we think only as humans.  To us,  there is a beginning and an ending to all things.  Not to God.  God always has been and always will be.
488235
There are two accounts of creation in Genesis, the six day account in chapter 1 and the second accound begining Gen 2:4-25.  In the second account we see God beimng refered to as the LORD God somewhat differently than in the first creation narrative.  The second account hold well with Evolutionary theorists and can allow for an evolutionary creation of the world by God and then man following lastly.
55265
God. (cheating) This explanation is what everyone eventually resorts to when the other answers fail. Now, before I go any further, I should make clear that I'm not talking about any of the gods defined in various religions. Throughout all of human history, we've been trying to explain existence. But nobody has ever succeeded. And it's likely that nobody ever will. So we create the concept of God, whose only necessary property is being "that which explains existence." \n\nThis doesn't tell us much about god, though. It doesn't mean that any particular religion is correct. It merely defines god as something which answers The Question, because we have not been able to. \nread this: http://www.toykeeper.net/philosophy/knowledge
202067
a straight answer? God wasn't created. He has just always been (existed). He is the author of all life, so He can't be created by anthing else.
505404
A plethora of authors wrote the Bible. It is contrary to Church teaching to say that God wrote the Bible. It is understood that the books of the Bible are inspired by God.
280950
God wasn't created, He just always "was"....faith is the substance of things unknown, having faith is what it is all about =)
623720
Who is the Creator \n\n\nBy Dr. Jaafar Shiekh Idris \n\nCan It Be Matter? \n    A very popular question among atheists is, ‘Granted that the existence of temporal things necessitates the existence of an eternal cause, why should that cause be the God of religion? Why can’t matter be eternal and be therefore in no need of an eternal creator?’ I shall argue, on an Islamic basis but at the same time also on a rational basis, that the attribute of eternity entails other attributes, which matter does not and cannot have, and cannot, in view of this, play the role of the original and ultimate cause of temporal things. Muslim theologians say that eternity of existence logically implies everlastingness. This is true because, if something is eternal then it does not depend for its existence on anything outside itself. If this is so then it can never pass away, because only those things pass away that lose some of the external conditions on which they depend for their existence. If the ultimate cause of temporal things is eternal and everlasting, it must of necessity be self-sufficient, qayyoom and ghanee. \n\n    Can there be more than one such creator? The Quran tells us that this is impossible;\n\n“God never had a child, nor have there been any gods beside him. [Had there been any], each of them would have appropriated to himself what he created, and some would have overcome others.” \n\n    This Quranic argument was paraphrased by some Muslims theologians in a way somewhat like the following: The assumption that there are gods beside the one true God leads to false consequences and must therefore be false. If there is more than one god, then (a) if every detail of everything in the world was the result of the action of one of the gods, it cannot at the same time be the result of the action of another god. But if (b) some things in the world were created by some gods, and others by other gods, then each god would rule independently over what he created, which means that nothing in his world can even in principle, be influenced by anything outside it. But this contradicts the observed unity and interdependence of the world. And if that is impossible, then (c) some gods will overcome others, but if that happens then the ones who are vanquished cannot be true gods. There can, therefore, be no more than one creator. \n\n    How does this creator create? Since He is self-sufficient, He cannot be said to depend on anything outside Himself in any actions, and cannot therefore be said to produce His effects the way natural causes do. But if He is not a natural cause, He must be a volitional agent. And since intention implies knowledge, and knowledge and intention imply life, he must be a living being. Since He is an eternal and everlasting being, all His attributes must reflect this quality; thus He must be not only knowing, but all-knowing, not only powerful, but all-powerful, etc. \n\n    Since no matter in any form can answer to these attributes, and since all these attributes are implied by the two attributes of eternity and everlastingness, no form of matter can be either eternal or everlasting, and thus no matter of any form can play the role of that ultimate cause. This much of the attributes that an eternal and everlasting creator must have is enough, I suppose, to show that it cannot be matter. \n\n    But this conclusion can be further confirmed by what modern science tells us about the nature of matter. \n\nWhy Should He Be the God of Islam? \n    Some might say, ‘Granted that this god is a personal and living God, and that He has the attributes which you mentioned, why should He be the God of Islam and not, say the Christian or Jewish God?’ The God of Islam is the God of all true prophets of God from Adam down to Moses, Jesus and Muhammad. But it is a basic claim of the religion with which Muhammad came that previous religions (including Christianity and Judaism) have not been kept in their pristine form which those
1014536
God......hello he created satan.
327357
God created man, no other creator made man before God.
550591
noone "created" god he has alwayz been in existence.
1142144
Well, none.\n\nThe God of the Book (Christian, Islamic, Jewish God) created the Earth... not the universe.\n\n:/\n\n- 16 yo Pagan