Frontpage or Dreamweaver?
372509
I've been Web programming for over seven years and have used both.\n\nHands-down, Dreamweaver is the more powerful tool for Web editing, either as a beginner or an old pro. Dreamweaver makes making Web pages pretty much easier than FrontPage does, and there's practically no support for XML or CSS in FrontPage, while Dreamweaver has huge support for both.\n\nFrontPage does make certain server-side tasks, such as sending e-mail via a form, easier than Dreamweaver does, if you have FrontPage extensions enabled on your Web site.\n\nBut the final test is simple: Look at your favorite Web sites and choose View Source Code from your browser at any home page it has.\n\nFrontPage leaves a META creator tag that says FrontPage; DreamWeaver uses MM_ in the front of all the JavaScript it creates.\n\nI bet, on your favorite sites, you almost never see the creator=FrontPage tag, but you commonly see the MM_ in the JavaScript on those pages.\n\nVery few serious Web designers / developers use FrontPage. Many use Dreamweaver; now that Dreamweaver is an Adobe product, the number of people using it is only going to grow.
371292
I use Macromedia Dreamweaver - I find that easy
116066
invest in a wysiwyg(what you see is what you get) editor like front page or another one that is much better than front page, i cant think of what its called right now.  and it guides and shows you what your site will look like.
914220
Hoo boy....just read my blog. \n\nhttp://360.yahoo.com/dreamweaver.629ok
652418
Hi\n\nIf you know to use macromedia dreamweaver or frontpage you can create a website easily. But if your first time user you got to explore a lot. But if web design is not your passion then proably you can give it to me. I can do it for you. Also you can host you website anyone. I will give the full control to you. My recommendations of hosting providers\n\nwww.netandhost.com \nwww.verio.com\nwww.melbourneit.com.au
1077726
microsoft frontpage and macromedia dreamweaver are good. try some of the hosting companies that offer templates. prewired.com is good for that. there is absolutely no html involved. which can be a bad thing if you want anything more than a cookie cutter website.
510087
If you want to do it the hard way just open a text editor (ie. notepad) and type in the HTML code. Otherwise, if you want a wysiwyg(graphical) editor, the good ones cost money.\n\nI find dreamweaver to be a good all-round program; easy enough to pick up but also powerful enough to be useful to professionals.\n\nIf you want to make it look good you may have to lay out for a good graphics editor too, but that's up to you.\n\nIf you don't want anything too fancy then this (http://www.alleycode.com/) looks quite good.\nNB. you can still produce professional looking website with this but the tasks may not be automated in the same way as with using a program like dreamweaver. This would make using it a little more time consuming but in the end would probably give you more working knowledge of the HTML code.\n\nI would also recommend having a look at these sites:\n\nhttp://www.w3schools.com/html/default.asp\n\nhttp://www.htmltutorials.ca/\n\nhttp://www.webdiner.com/webadv/index.htm\n\nOh, as a last point you will need a company to host your page and a web address so that people can browse to your site.\n\nAlmost all ISPs provide you with a minimal amount of space and a subdomain name. They will probably provide website editing pages too-take a look on your ISPs homepage and see if there is an option to "log in" and then one for something to do with "webspace". The webpages to edit your personal site will be user friendly but not as powerful as an HTML editor.\n\nFor business purposes paying for a domain name can be of use and lends a more professional edge to a site(costs less than $30 a year depending on the domain name). I won't, however, recommend any hosting or domain name registration sites in case I give an overpriced one.
610703
www.macromedia.com the tutorial is with the free trial of dreamweaver..you are better off getting fireworks as well..great for designing the website and the two go hand in hand
1077328
Macromedia Dreamweaver 8\n\nZonealarm Security Suite
292101
In HTML the best for me is Dreamweaver.
17571
The best way to find answers for Dreamweaver questions like this is to go to the Dreamweaver support site at Macromedia. Since your Dreamweaver may be running on a Mac or some other platform it is hard to answer your question directly.\n\nYou can go here and find your solution:\nhttp://www.macromedia.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?event=search&mode=simple&search_text=upload&product=SG_Dreamweaver
472508
There is an absolutely wonderful html editor that is 100 percent free and in my opinion is on a par with Dreamweaver.  In some ways I find it better than dreamweaver and in others Dreamweaver is better.  The program is 1stPage 2000 and you can download it at http://www.evrsoft.com/ \n\nIt has 4 levels of user interface to help teach you the program and html programming too if you are so inclined. Fully supports ALL other programming formats, CSS, PHP, ASP, XML, etc, etc.\n\nTheir new version is out now too, although it is not free.
1108704
I prefer Dreamweaver.
632635
wysiwyg writes the html for you as you are dragging things on the page. no need to convert it. just upload the page to the server when you are done with it. do not use frontpage. it's difficult for newbies and uses code only internet explorer can view. get dreamweaver
249616
Macromedia Dreamweaver\nMicrosoft Frontpage\nor simple Notepade!
785618
Among both of them Macromedia DreanWeaver is best if you want to give your site professional look.Anyhow if you are not an expert in web designing;the better software is WebPage Maker.
7013
I use Macromedia Dreamweaver, but Frontpage is as good as it comes.\nBut your choice comes of other question: What kind of website U intend to build? \nTo create simple websites, go 4 Frontpage, is one of the simplest.\nTo create professional looking web sites, with database capabilities, in a RAD environment, use Dreamweaver, even when training is a bit harder.