What is the punishment for AGGRAVATED INDECENT LIBERTIES for a first time offender?. It occured in KANSAS.?
365244
Just Asking, I know that you have sent this question in an email to me directly and I have to apologize for not being an expert in Kansas law, in fact in New york there is no such law as Aggravated Indecent Liberties.  But if I had to guess, it's similar to having sex or sexual contact with a minor (who is incapable of consent by the mere fact that they are a minor).  I believe that it is a felony in Kansas but I don't know the punishment structure there.  Being a first time offender will play in his favor but he will still receive some sort of jail time and or probation.  Plus he will not be allowed to have any contact with the victim.  I wish I could be of more help but I have only been to Kansas once (Washburn School of Law) and I didn't come across any indecent liberties while there.\n\n5/2/06: Just Asking, I tried to email you but it wouldn't go through.  He probably won't do jail time being a first time offender but his probation will probably last a couple years with no contact with the victim.  You may want to contact your local Crime Victim Advocate and/or your local DA.  I would be happy to research this futher for you if you'd like.  Could you send me another email address?  The one you are using for Yahoo Answers says it's not confirmed and it won't let me reply.  Thanks.
759588
People who are caught for the first time are termed as accused. A jailbird is usually called as KD - as it means he is a well "known deviant" from the law.
305691
In the state of Missouri, a C felony is punishable 1 to 7 yrs incarceration. I have 3 C felony's for possesion of a controled substance (meth) and a D felony on my record. With the third C felony, the courts did indict me and because I then had three C's, charged me with Prior & Persistant Which is a B felony and carries 5-15 yrs doc.\n I was lucky and had a decent lawyer, he got the Prosucuting Attn to agree not to give me anymore than three yrs. For that to be possible, 3 yrs, it had to be brought back down to a C. \n    D felony is, I think  1-4yrs not real sure on that one. \nI know for a fact that a C felony is 1-7 yrs 1 being the least the judge might give, 7 being the max he is allowed to give.\n My first offense I got caught with about 2 grams of meth, I received 5 yrs probation with 2 yrs SIS. SIS is suspended imposition of sentance. that means I go on probation for 5 yrs, if at anytime in that 5 yrs I commit the same or any other crimes, or receive a number of many possible violations of probation, I go to prison to serve the 2 yrs.\n  \n(the rest of the story, I ended up serving 120 day shock on the first charge because I got the second charge... was allowed back on probation after the 120 days, with 3 yrs back up for the second charge, violated probation, technicalities and served 6 months of the three yr sentance. got the third charge a few yrs later by being in th e wrong place at the wrong time... event though I had learned my lesson. and got another 3 yrs and served 6 months on that).... all done now....no more for me ty.lol) \n\n Depending on the amount he was caught with and extenuating circumstances, if not a lot, and no prior record, and a fairly decent lawyer, he'll most likely get probation.
412447
The link below requires registration, but I think it might have your answer right there.  It even specified in NC.  I think you get put on probation, or stricter probation or something.
146295
It is certainly possible that such a person would be subject to criminal jurisdiction by each state, and by the Federal Government.  He was already convicted? Is this about where he is to be imprisoned?
99195
What was his offense? It's pretty easy these days to become a "Registered Sex Offender"... I know one guy who wound up charged with sex crimes when "Drunk in Public" would have been the appropriate charge...he urinated in public (the parking lot) and did not zip back up... and now must register as an SO for the next 5 years... all I'm saying is that there may be more to the story and this guy may not be any danger at all, to anyone...If the dad truly should be kept away from his daughter, she should contact a victim's rights advocacy group for advice.
562668
Failure to Register which is a 5 year prison term. Also, he will be charged with violating probation, which can carry his original sentence. He is definitely looking at prison time and probation when he gets out of prison. He will also have the GPS on when he gets out.
409022
felony even if its only 1 pill and your first offence. most first time offenders in fl get 18-36 months probation depending on wich county you live in mine was pinnellas county. st pete. try not to use a court appointed lawyer if you dont have to your best bet is to hire your own. good luck.
931972
Probably going to have to re-word your question or at least add some additional information here.  I know I don't have a clue what you're asking, and it doesn't look like anyone else does, either.\n\nTry explaining more about this, and include the state you're in.  Also probably be a good idea to explain more about what you mean by the penalty differing from what's in the penal codes.  If you're only charged so far, there's no penalty because you haven't been convicted yet.
361798
Jail time and/or fines.  In some cases, probation is the sentence.  Child Rape:  Many states have passed a law called Jessica's Law.  A girl named Jessica was raped and killed in Florida by a man who had already committed rape, but was given a light sentence.  To prevent this from happening again, Jessica's law sets a sentence of a minimum of 25 years, and a GPS tracking device on the rapists when they get out of jail.\n\nMany liberals are against this, either because they don't like the GPS (right to "privacy" even though the GPS system would save lives) or they hate children:)
45953
My wife had some time ago.  We no longer live there. I don't know if that helps.  We hired an attorney out of KS.\n\nIs there a blog?  I've heard that can help.  Link is a good idea.  More people will probably come forward anonymously.
555054
its a felony assault the person who did this should be arrested, and could get as little as 2 years in prison, if its a first offense it would probably be about 2 yrs.\n(family Experience)
1073410
Go to findlaw.com and research your states law for sexual assault. Chances are since he broke probation, he will have that time to actively serve too. It doesn't look good. Especially if they 'box-car' his sentences, meaning serving one before he can start another.
711541
More than likely he'll spend the night in jail and get out the next day.  Then he'll have a court hearing regarding the charges.  IF this is his first offense he MAY be able to plea it down to disorderly conduct, IF the victim agrees.  If this is a habit he'll do time and pay lots of court fees.
807175
Govt. is very harsh on meth possesion b/c it is america's top drug right now. If he is a 1st offender hopefully he can get probation and rehab but otherwise it is a felony so they could give him a few weeks but nothing any harsher then that because its simple poss.
425810
"Applying Criminal Penalties to \nActions in Cyberspace"\n\nPreface: The messages below were posted in the Cybercrimes Seminar during September, 1998, as part of the class discussions.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nArticle No. 331: posted by Susan Brenner on Mon, Sep. 14, 1998, 13:29\nSubject: Blank scenario: the Student #9 statute\n\nArticle No. 274: [Branch from no. 273] posted by Student #9 on Sat, Sep. 12, 1998, 23:19\n\nThe following is a quick and dirty first draft of a proposed statute to criminalize any action producing the type of injury involved in the Blank case. It draws from CA Penal Code sections 288.2(b) and 647.6(a). I did not have a copy of a criminal statute that provides for additional civil remedies, handy...so I winged it.\n\nMy belief is that this rough draft contains enough flaws to inspire an evolutionary discussion process, ultimately, leading to the production of a sample model statute. Might be good practice...if enough of us join in. So go ahead and propose: a)why we should trash it, altogether [but, don't forget to include your alternative!]; b)how the draft should be revised; etc.\n\nMPC section 1.01:\n\n(a) Every person who knowingly distributes, sends, causes to be sent, exhibits, or offers to distribute or exhibit by electronic mail, the Internet, as defined in Section 17538 of the Business and Professions Code, or a commercial online service, any false or legally protected matter about another person, and with the intent, or for the purpose of causing said person embarrassment, or economic, professional or social harm shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars, by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both the fine or imprisonment. \n\n(b)Every person who (cut and paste from above up to)...or social harm, resulting in injury to said person shall be subject to civil liability of not less than ten thousand dollars and not exceeding one hundred thousand dollars.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nArticle No. 334: [Branch from no. 331] posted by Student #9 on Mon, Sep. 14, 1998, 14:44\nSubject: re: Blank scenario: the Student #9 statute\n\nI do not favor the forfeiture approach--Internet Service Providers sometimes require user acceptance of the terms of a specific agreement that addresses user liability for such activity with corresponding prohibitive language towards same(e.g., Yahoo email agreement).\n\nRe: the statute\n\nIf we define "person" to include both individuals and organizations, the fine and civil remedies seem a bit low. Perhaps setting the fines at "not less than $5,000 for each independent publication [as identified by ISP records]...what upper limit would be appropriate?\n\nHypo: If McDonald's Corporation discovered that Wendy's hired an agent to spread internet rumors that McDonald's used red earth worms to increase the protein content of their burgers, the cap on civil remedies seems almost an invitation to cyber-mischief. How should we set civil remedies as provided by this statute to serve as an adequate deterrent? \n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nArticle No. 335: [Branch from no. 334] posted by Student #9 on Mon, Sep. 14, 1998, 14:56\nSubject: re: Blank scenario: the Student #9 statute\n\nClarification--I do favor civil remedies provided by the criminal statute, as reflected in its drafting. I would prefer that Internet Service Providers be immune from either criminal sanctions or civil liabilities. Persons--either individuals or organizations--should be subject to both criminal sanctions and civil liabilities reasonably calculated to both deter the commission of the object crime and provide remedies for the victims of same.\n\n------------------------------------------------------------\n\nArticle No. 340: [Branch from no. 334] posted by Student #10 on Mon, Sep. 14, 1998, 17:46\nSubject: r
903873
I once put a guy in prison for 5 years for raping me(he only got statutory). WIt was a very traumatizing time for me and the sentance isnt so brief. With this in mind Id have to say I think a woman like this should get the minimum sentance for a rape charge seeing how she rtried to force that jail term on an innocent man. He couldve been found guilty and wouldve had that label for his whole life,getting registered and not allowed in some housing/apartment complexes bc of it,job issues,time lost of his life. She deserves the same sentance, They were too easy on her.