Who will be the next government of Bangladesh?
370416
BNP (Bangladesh National Party)\n\nLets see....
315592
Bangladesh was the last country granted test status on the 10th of November 2000.  Zimbabwe gained test status on the 18th of October 1992, they currently have a suspended test status until 2007.  There is a February tour of Sri Lanka tentatively scheduled for February of 2007 between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe.\n\nTechnically Zimbabwe have not lost their test status, it is merely suspended, so Bangladesh will remain the last side to be granted test status.  Kenya, Scotland and Ireland are the main contenders for future test status.
484893
BEGUM KHALIDA ZIA \n\nWIFE OF ZIAUR RAHMAN....
378071
The Birmingham government webiste has the candidates listed here:\n\nhttp://www.birmingham.gov.uk/GenerateContent?CONTENT_ITEM_ID=79158&CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE=0&MENU_ID=14275&EXPAND=512
466393
I think u r half informed... king has announced that he will alow election for prime minister post... but the prime minister will report again to the monarch... this is still not democracy.. I wld say it is democrazy!!!\n\nwell the people of nepal do not want the king to continue in his throne but rather leave that for a fresh president and thus become a proper democratic state...
1161077
The area which is now Bangladesh has a rich historical and cultural past, the product of the repeated influx of varied peoples, bringing with them the Dravidian, Indo-Aryan, Mongol-Mughul, Arab, Persian, Turkic, and European cultures. About 1200 A.D., Muslim invaders under Sufi influence, supplanted Hindu and Buddhist dynasties, and converted most of the population of the eastern areas of Bengal to Islam. Since then, Islam has played a crucial role in the region's history and politics. In the 16th century, Bengal was absorbed into the Mughul Empire. \n\nPortuguese traders and missionaries reached Bengal in the latter part of the 15th century. They were followed by representatives of the Dutch, the French, and the British East India Companies. During the 18th and 19th centuries, especially after the defeat of the French in 1757, the British gradually extended their commercial contacts and administrative control beyond Calcutta into the remainder of Bengal and northwesterly up the Ganges River valley. In 1859, the British Crown replaced the East India Company, extending British dominion from Bengal in the east to the Indus River in the west. \n\nIn the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Muslim and Hindu leaders began to press for a greater degree of independence. At the movement's forefront was the largely Hindu Indian National Congress. Growing concern about Hindu domination of the movement led Muslim leaders to form the All-India Muslim League in 1906. In 1913, the League formally adopted the same goal as the Indian National Congress: self-government for India within the British Empire. The Congress and the League were unable, however, to agree on a formula to ensure the protection of Muslim religious, economic, and political rights. Over the next 2 decades, mounting tension between Hindus and Muslims led to a series of bitter intercommunal conflicts. \n\nThe idea of a separate Muslim state emerged in the 1930s. It gained popularity among Indian Muslims after 1936, when the Muslim League suffered a decisive electoral defeat in the first elections under the 1935 constitution. On March 23, 1940, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, leader of the Muslim League, publicly endorsed the "Pakistan Resolution" that called for the creation of an independent state in regions where Muslims were a majority. \n\nAt the end of World War II, the United Kingdom, under considerable international pressure to reduce the size of its overseas empire, moved with increasing urgency to grant India independence. The Congress Party and the Muslim League could not, however, agree on the terms for drafting a constitution or establishing an interim government. In June 1947, the UK declared it would grant full dominion status to two successor states--India and Pakistan. Pakistan would consist of the contiguous Muslim-majority districts of western British India, plus parts of Bengal. The various princely states could freely join either India or Pakistan. These arrangements resulted in a bifurcated Muslim nation separated by more than 1,600 kilometers (1,000 mi.) of Indian territory. West Pakistan comprised four provinces and the capital, Lahore. East Pakistan was formed of a single province. Each province had a legislature. The capital of federal Pakistan was at Islamabad. \n\nPakistan's history for the next 26 years was marked by political instability and economic difficulties. Dominion status was rejected in 1956 in favor of an "Islamic Republic within the Commonwealth." Attempts at civilian political rule failed, and the government imposed martial law between 1958 and 1962 and 1969 and 1972. The government was dominated by Military and Oligarchies all rooted in the West. Significant amount of national revenues went towards developing the West at the expense of the East. The people of the Eastern wing began to feel increasingly dominated and exploited by the West. Frictions between West and East Pakistan culminated in a 1971 army crackdown
674543
You are living under the shadows of india, your politicians are corrupt and no leader in Bangladesh now a days can stand for his country. I think that is the main reason for the neglections.
487096
bangladesh, and then comes Pakistan
618353
I think ADMK. Dr. J. Jayalalitha has done a pretty decent job as CM in the last term. She has managed to compensate for the damage to the TN. treasury caused by DMK previously and she has brought Tamilnadu some national attention. I am not denying that like all politicians she also amassed a lot of wealth using her politacal influence - but it looks like she is finally satisfied with what she has and has truly begun using her powers for the benefit of the state. People are realizing this. She is politically stronger now than ever. She is more mature in her knowledge of dealing with opponents and tackling obstacles - I have no doubt that ADMK will be the ruling party after May 2006 elections.
86582
We have a new government and besides of some playing major roles nobody really knows the names of our new  ministers:\nIt's a coalition formed by the two biggest political parties (social democrats and christian democrats) leaving the smaller ones in  an opposing role (communists, the Green Party and conservative liberal)\nOur former president Johannes RAU died after a serious illness.\n so a lot of things  are changing right now - we have to wait for the results...
54880
Nothing, the extremist wing will continue its work until the next Parlement Election (Next year) when people will select the other party and then Government will  become weaker and 3 years later they will select a president from the more peaceful party.\nThey will learn to appriciate those who have done good jobs for them like their former president Khatami.\nPersians are the most Unrespectful people on earth, that guy did great job for them and they only fussed at him.\nThey also have a soccer player who has scored for them most in their history and they only curse him.\nThey need punishment.
674144
This Election \n\nDMK will come to Power with the Outside Support of \n\n\nDMDK Party led by Vijaykanth..
76722
nobody really knows. but i hope in the near future. as far as i know, its presently ruled by a military junta and they are already planning to hold elections to finally construct a democratic government. But up until now, there hasn't been an election. There was one election where Nobel Peace prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi and her democratic party overwhelmingly won. but the junta just arrested her and cancelled the elections for a later date. We can only wait when the junta will finally give in to the demands of the world and its people.
636771
probably after the election.
880610
If a gov't is corrupt, then new young leadership must step up and clean house.\n\nIndia is full of corruption. It's time for a change!
1096101
Rahul Gandhi. If Advani becomes the PM, he'd probably make ethnic cleansing legal.
1057854
The Next President\nMurray Wesson does some speculation on the question of who Thabo Mbeki will appoint as his deputy president. It’s an interesting question because whoever gets the job will almost certainly be South Africa’s next president after Mbeki completes his second term.\n\nMurray argues that you can eliminate three of the top five candidates for various reasons (health, scandals, etc.), leaving Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma and Trevor Manuel. And that between them, Dlamini-Zuma is the more likely candidate. Perhaps, but my sources (oh, the joys of living in Pretoria) tell me that she may not want the job. That doesn’t mean she won’t accept it though! When the president phones you up to tell you that he wants you to be his successor, it’s a rare person who replies “sorry, I’ve got other plans”.\n\nThat said, I think Murray may be making a mistake in his analysis by dismissing Jacob Zuma. Before the election, I also figured that Mbeki would consider him a liability and use the cabinet reshuffle as an opportunity to appoint someone else. But if Mbeki was really planning to ditch Zuma, the most logical place to send him would be the premiership of KZN, not some cabinet post. My prediction is that Jacob Zuma stays on as deputy president.