is the lochness monster real???is there proof?
370048
i don't think the loch ness monster is real. I think it's more of a myth that someone started and it kind of flared and spread around. There were a few pics in the past that were supposed the "loch ness monster" but the photographers later confessed that they were all a joke. As far as i know, there is no real proof that shows the loch ness monster is real :]
616245
Fake, the guy who started the whole Bigfoot thing told reporters that Bigfoot was made up right before he died.  Yet, people hunting for Bigfoot have said that they are not going to let that deter them from finding Bigfoot.  Do you see a problem here?  I hate stupid people.  Anyway, that one is certainly fake, the others are probably not true either.
677704
Sadly, nothing plausible at this time.\n\nMany believers in the Sasquatch have it that the professional zoologists have some kind of conspiracy to cover up the existence of Sasquatch, but in fact most zoologists would be ecstatic if such a new, exciting species were to be found.\n\nThe closest anyone has come to credible evidence is the infamous Patterson film, purportedly of a Sasquatch walking along a creek bed.  There are many technical inconsistencies with the film, as well as anecdotal evidence from costumers that indicate that the film is more likely a hoax than actual footage.
1097492
Fake tht has been exposed.. sorry to dash ur thoughts ...truth is i saw a scientific documentary which clearly shows how he uses magician like tricks to fool people \n\nFor eg tryin to convince people into thinkin he can somehow bless them with his 'miraculous dust' when really it was jus a small piece of chalk neatly hidden between his fingers and crushed when supposedly 'anointin or blessin' his followers\n\nIn addition also am aware of people who claim to ave been sexually abused.. even if u thought them to be detractors u cant deny the prev mentioned scientific evidence..
773163
Interesting...but is there truly any way to know for sure?  It's like the Shroud of Turin, there's so much controversy that the true science in it is lost.  I think that it's the general consensus that will influence the possibilities of orgin and usage (scary, huh).
249940
I had to look it up which is the one thing about Yahoo Answers that I adore, all of these questions about thing you never heard of before. It sounded interesting so this is what I found.\n\nThey may be all around us... in the sky, in the water, even in our homes. They have been captured only on film and videotape. No one knows what they are, where they come from, whether or not they are alive, and they have never been touched or seen at rest.\n\nThey are called "rods," "skyfish" and sometimes "solar entities." Although the video evidence is compelling that they are quite real and probably living creatures, they are completely unknown to science - a fascinating and baffling mystery.\n\nSkyfish were first documented by filmmaker José Escamilla, who discovered them by accident. In 1994, Escamilla had videotaped a "conventional" UFO near Midway, New Mexico. Fourteen days later, while seeking to photograph the UFO again, he instead captured a flying object that was not a vehicle of any kind. At first he thought it was just an insect or bird. When he examined the film frame by frame, however, it became clear that what he had captured on film was something unknown. Later, more distinct images were captured while Escamilla was filming cliff jumpers at a deep cave in Mexico. When he developed the film, small flying things could be seen zipping around the divers at a high rate of speed - so fast that they weren't seen with the naked eye. \n\nThe enhanced frames of film revealed that the flying thing appeared to be rod-shaped with two undulating wings or appendages along the length of the body and which gave it the appearance of swimming through the air. Escamilla dubbed them "rods" and has since filmed and videotaped them dozens of times. And after introducing them to the public through his website, roswellrods.com, he has received further reports and video and photographic evidence from other parts of the US and around the world. The strange flying enigmas have also turned up in documentary footage, TV news shots and even feature films.\n\nAre They Alive?\n\nWithout a specimen in hand to examine, it's impossible to determine whether or not skyfish are living organisms, but it's Escamilla's best guess that they are. The video evidence certainly makes them seem so. They move through the air like insects or birds, sometimes darting around objects with a kind of animal intelligence - but at a speed far greater than any known insect or bird. How fast? Analysis of film and video of skyfish from around the world indicate that they can be moving as fast as 150 to 1,000 miles per hour - faster than the speed of sound. \n\nHow big are they? The same analysis indicates that they might range in size from just a few inches to perhaps over a hundred feet in length! How could something that large be unknown? That's part of the skyfish mystery, yet there they are on video.\n\nAlthough most skyfish have been seen in the air outdoors, they have also been photographed and videotaped indoors and even underwater. A photograph displayed on Kitty's Kitchen website appears to show a skyfish in mid-flight ready to pass through a doorway in her home. And a TV news report on Escamilla from KCOP Channel 13 includes clear footage of a skyfish swimming in a stream, indicating that they are equally at home in the water
52805
Yes, they are real.  A pic can be found on Wikipedia (see source).
1144268
it was a hoax.. check yahoo news
102132
Are you kidding?? No it's not real. lol
386420
No! That is absolute bunk. Check out the highly entertaining Myth Busters episode on this subject.
991055
No one has ever produced any convincing evidence that anything besides perhaps the odd otter or two lives in Loch Ness.\n\nDespite numerous 'expeditions' and untold numbers of tourists coming to the lake every year, no one has ever produced so much as a half decent picture of one.\n\nAll the signs point to the probability that there's nothing there.
879536
No.  There isn't the slightest scrap of evidence that a worldwide flood occurred.  Nor is there any possible physical way to construct a wooden vessel the size described by the Bible without it cracking apart under its own mass in the water.  Nor is there any reaonably possible way for such a vessel to be ventilated by a single tiny window.  Or even have enough for two--or seven--of every species in the world.  Or an even remotely believeable method for a handful of people to actually be able to take care of all the animals aboard the Ark for nearly a year.  \n\nNot to mention the many ancient civilizations like the Chinese and the Summerians who somehow managed to keep right of going and not even notice their own desrtruction.\n\nThe more you look closely at the tale, the more "Godmagic" you have to invoke in your effort to explain away the real-world problems of the story.  Since there's no such thing as magic, it's safe to chaulk the entire story as fiction.  A secondary creationist tale.\n\nBTW:  Yes, there are many civilizations that have tales of floods.  Floods were a near-universal experience for our ancestors, so naturally they would be incorperated into mythologies.  What the Creationists convienently overlook is the wide variety of differences between all the flood stories...the number of survivors ranges from two to entire tribes, the details of the source of the floods and the motives of the gods that cause them are all different, etc...  The only commonality of the tales is the involvment of a lot of water.
311366
No monster in that lake....but a nice tourist attraction\n\nhttp://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/lesj/ness.htm
1026875
Yes, that is hilarious!  I'm wondering if it is real, too, though.  Someone else here said it was not real.  Regardless, a very good laugh!
906146
Even the best photos have been debunked. Nessie is often believed to be a leftover dinosaur like creature. It's a great story but there just isn't enough food to sustain a creature of that size in the lochs.\n\nIf a creature like "Nessie" lives, it's in the oceans, not in the lochs.\nThis a good photo of an odd carcass picked up by some japanese fishman that's quite interesting. It's from 1977, and still debated by some.\n\nAnd remember Giant Squids (Architeuthis) were considered a myth too, until just a few years ago they were finally found, photographed and proven to be real. And why did they look? Because those japanese fisherman kept pulling dead ones up.
538732
Real funny mister sinner.\nYou'll be laughing all the way to hell.\nThe Loch Ness Monster isn't real.  Do you think you can just worship something that isnt real?  I've got news for ya, pal.  We Christians are about 2000 years ahead of you on that one.
1052046
For the past 20 years I have been keeping up on the research into the Loch Ness Monster, and there have been a lot of people looking. Loch Ness is a heavily monitored lake. They've looked a lot, and they haven't discovered a single bit of evidence. I'm ready to call it and say that the beastie isn't there.\n\nAlthough, there is another possibility. I don't know if this has occurred to anyone else, but if everything has a spirit, then everything could have a ghost, so it could be possible for there to be ghost dinosaurs and one could be haunting Loch Ness.