can a great dictatory can be a great CEO of a company?
371856
first learn the industrial management and enhance ur ethico-moral values ........... then a big YES
589002
If the owner's relative was not the best candidate for the position, it certainly wasn't ethical and that's called nepotism.  Unfortunately, I think it is legal.\n\nIt isn't fair, in my opinion, and demonstrates to other employees that the owner is not loyal to them or respectful of them.
155402
A corporation is owned by its stock holders.  That includes a lot of what is classicly called "widows & orphans;" that is, people who are dependent upon the income from their investments, especially if held in mutual funds or in a trust.  A lot of times they are not at all wealthy, having inherited those assets.  Once they start spending the capital, not just the interest, they will be doomed to smaller and smaller incomes until they starve.\n\nWhen we think of a large corporation, the tendency is to think of the officers and executives of the company, who get huge salaries and benefits, including stock in the company.  But there are very few people with the organizational skills to hold down such a position.  Also, there are very few people who are not only capable but willing, given the long hours, heavy responsibilities, lack of privacy, and social demands (going to all sorts of social activities for business reasons, rather than for your own pleasure).  I, for one, don't need money so bad that I would put up with all that.  So, they get huge salaries and benefits on the same supply and demand law that governs us all: there is so much demand for competent executives, and so little supply.\n\nThose who condemn large corporations have probably bought the BS that was being dished out in the USSR years ago.  Or they fail to see that some projects require a large organization to achieve the goal.  When I worked for Bechtel (the largest privatly owned corporation in America at the time), they were building a whole city to accommodate a population of 100,000 as just ONE of their projects.  Even if they hire innumerable subcontractors, it takes a lot to plan and execute such a project.  It couldn't be done by a "mom & pop" operation!
233334
Not directly. Most executives are hired by the Board of Directors. The Board is elected by voting shareholders.
8328
CEO of a technology corporation\nBaseball player
802488
Sheik of Dubai. I heard tonight on the tele that he is a CEO of many corporations in Dubai and he a billionaire many times over. I am sure he made most of his $$ from his daddy and big brother though.
812807
It is possible to have a benign dictator - someone who has absolute control and uses it (to some extent) to benefit the people he governs.  But it is hard to argue that the government of Cuba is anything else when opposition groups are illegal and there are no observers or NGO oversight during elections.\n\nCastro has done a lot for his country, particularly in terms of education and medicine, but it is sad to see it come with a loss of civil and human rights.  I think it's misleading to look at his actions as entirely good or bad.
770021
Probably. He is a great leader and he is known to win a whole lot, even under impossible odds.
1107148
They want the corporations to rule the world!
337662
exactly like what Julius Ceasar, Napoleon, and Hitler wanted...this isn't to say that it might not work and make the majority of people happy given a compassionate and good leader.  However, the world is too big, and some militant extremist group would start some crap.  It's not quite possible.\n\nHowever, I've read science fiction novels about the world being run by corporations in the future.  This is a very interesting idea, and seems more probable than everyone being considered one country.
231649
Better to be one`s own boss than someone else`s servant.
366385
I had a great boss at my last workplace.  Here are some of the reasons why I thought so:\n\n1. Led by example.  He treated the office as a family, cared about the people, and he was personally very committed and hard working therefore, the people tended to be more committed and hard working.  We actually worked with a sister company under the same president and CEO.  just the two division were run day to day by different General Managers.  Yet this culture and attitude of the two divisions was night and day, and I definitely attribute the better working environment to the personality of our General Manager (my boss).\n\n2. Had an open door and fought to get rid of the institutional/corporate roadblocks for me to be able to accomplish my job.\n\n3. Unafraid to make tough decisions and stand up for them.  Overall, I think leadership has a lot to do with character and confidence.  Confident and secure people tend to not be the ones who fly off the handle for no reason and are unafraid to be decisive and not waffle about.
209866
Of course. When any boss hires an employee, he expects that employee to generate more wealth for him than he pays them.\nIt's called Capitalism. If the rate of pay is mutually agreed upon, then both parties should be happy.
637895
You can find a very nice biography in the Sands Las Vegas website, of which he is the Chairman & CEO http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=185629&p=irol-govBio&ID=128704
751831
Becasue politicians rule the country.\nAny business if it wants to survive in this world must have good relationship with the rulers and lawmakers.\nLawmakers make laws which have impact on the businesses of these large corporations. Corporations like Microsoft that are truely global gaints can be easily effected by new legislation.
112819
I'm going to quote from Spiderman here (as lame as that is) lol.  "With great power comes great resposibility."\n\nI would think that a person, nation, corporation, etc. that was truely powerful would have the resposiblity to help or protect the weak. Even better would be to teach the weak to become strong. The powerful have the ability to either use it to dominate or for more noble purposes.
461500
The board of directors control the company from the top.  If they don't like anything about the company, they're allowed to vote and make certain changes.  They can fire anyone, including the CEO after a vote.  So, in essence, they have final say on the major decisions, making them the ultimate managers.