Is human acting as per the movement of planets in the universe?
374462
None at all. The human gives himself too much importance. Essentially, the role of mankind is as unimportant as the role of rocks, mosquitos and, actually, anything in the universe. However, mankind would not survive had it accepted the absolute pointlesness of its existance and so, our elevating of humanity's status above something what it really is seems only natural.
343599
you've got it backwards. Anyways different masses of matter and gas made the planets that's  one of my theories. so there you have it.
440880
Well I am not sure if it is proper to apply the term to the sun, but the sun's apparent motion against the background of fixed stars is always in the same direction as that of planets that are moving in the prograde direction.
1117424
Here's what probably happened:  Planets normally move in an orbit around a star (sun).  There is the occasion that a rather large astroid may hit a planet knocking it out of sync with its orbit.  Based on that theory, the wobble produced could force the planet out of its orbit all together.  Then, yes, it would be possible for planets to collide.  Could you imagine what that might look like?  With that said, I'd say that there is an off chance of the same happening to earth.
284410
No.\nI am immersed in the re-release of 'Cosmos', the Carl Sagan tour of Life, the Universe and et cetera.\nThe stars are distant suns or galaxies, in some cases.\nScientists have taken readings indicating that everything is flying away from us at immense speeds.  We might think we are the center of the universe, but we are near the edge of just one smaller galaxy.\nRemember, in an explosion, the outer material flings away at a high rate of speed, and that near the center at a slower rate.  The 'ball of dirt' in the medium range assumes that everything is flying away from it.  And promptly begins judging amateur singers.
116858
it confirms mine.  Being wiccan/pagan I believe that the earth is a living, breathing being that is growing and changing.  Pangea is proof of that.  While the earths growth and changes take longer than the lifespan of humans it does happen.
221462
Actually, No.\n\nIf our planet was anything but symetric about the access of rotation, it would develop a tremendous vibration or wobble.  This would lead either to localized forces that would eject people and things beyond the gravitational field, or would result in the complete breakup of the planet itself.\n\nSorry.
928537
not at all, the material weight is just taking different forms, a person is a composition of something already here, there is not heavier planet.\n\n:> peace\n.
615320
No way, there must be many, many planets throughout the universe that are similar to our own and support life. There are probably many others that support life that is much different than we are accustomed to also.
599254
The Sun, its pull is making the planets in this system orbit.
1130994
Yes, the planets go through phases. Celestial phases are basically light hitting different hemispheres at different times.
367327
Yes.  Actually there is a mathmatical formula for finding the number of habital planets in the universe.  I remember that it is in three parts, but cannot for the life of me remember the exact formula.  It is based on number of stars (suns), how many planets would be orbiting the suns with the same life producing elements we have on earth, and the possibility of the same type of factors in evolution we had here on earth.  \nThe problem with the formula is that it represents only the type enviromental factors to produce "life" as we know it, not taking into regards other element based sources of life.  For instance, we are water based, whereas some other life forces may be silicon (Star Trek fans) based or based on an element we don't even know about.  \nYou may want to search the internet for the formula.  Sorry I can't remember it from my astronomy classes many years ago!
1171072
Not at all.  The Milky Way, Andromeda and a few other galaxies are in the "local group".  The galaxies in this group orbit around each other.  Just like our planets.  At times some planets will be seen to recede from us and at other times they will be getting closer as all go along in their respective orbits.
388822
our neighbor in other planets
1046630
I can agree with that. The earth is changing. So many will not make it through but some will. \nLove & Light\nSharon\nOne Planet = One People
1159975
No.  I think it can be generalized that humans judge motion in two ways.  First, a physical reaction; feeling a car on the road, or wind in your face.  Second, a visual reference; such as trees buzzing past or a familiar landmark getting closer.\n\nSince there is no "atmosphere" to speak of in orbit (at least not what we'd consider an atmosphere anyway), there is nothing physical to oppose his motion.  Therefore, from his perspective, he is just sitting there.  Also, since the shuttle that he's tethered to is also moving at the same speed, it doesn't appear to move either (unless of course the astronaut is moving toward, away from, or parallel to the ship somehow).  Regardless, with no frame of reference, there is no sensation of motion.\n\nWell, what about the Earth?  Surely that is a frame of reference.  Well, yes and no.  Sure, one could look at the rotating Earth below them and get some sense of how fast they were moving.  However, anyone who has taken a road trip and has been driving towards a mountain range (i.e. driving across Nebraska towards the Rockies) knows that something that far away and that large can fool the senses into believing that you've stopped.  Therefore, I would (and this is an opinion) discount the Earth as a frame of reference.
959085
the rotation of the earth and the semisic activity