What does Quoad ultra mean in law?
374987
“Quoad ultra denied” is broadly translated as “Everything else in the other side’s pleadings is completely untrue.”\n\nIt is just a form thing.  It doesn't actually mean anything that you need to pay attention to.
1154588
ubiquitous...meaning "everywhere" of course.\nIn Latin, "ubi" means "where," so it makes sense.\n\nFlibbertigibbets are ubiquitous on Yahoo, don't you agree?
416598
The US Constitution states that "No.. ex post facto law shall be passed." [Article 1 Section 9]\n\n"Ex Post Facto" is Latin for "after the fact". Basically, it means that you cannot be punished for doing something that was legal when you did it. That doesn't mean that if you keep doing it after the law changes you won't get into trouble.
703737
Similar systems are used on other countries as well.\n\nWhere there a multiple possible interpretations, the court should choose the one that makes sense given other laws. This could be to avoid absurdity, or to avoid conflict with other higher laws.
35299
This website could ans your question: <http://www.techlawjournal.com/glossary/legal/certiorari.htm>
450255
In the Middle East, zaghareet is an ululation performed to honor someone.\n\n**An ululation is a long, wavering, high-pitched sound resembling the howl of a wolf. It is an onomatopoeic word derived from Latin. Ululation is found in some singing techniques and ritual situations. In Arab countries ululation is commonly used by women to express celebration**
541892
Apparently better than yours.\n"Quotient"
67429
per·ju·ry    (pûrj-r) KEY  \n\nNOUN: pl. per·ju·ries \n1.) Law:  The deliberate, willful giving of false, misleading, or incomplete testimony under oath. \n2.) The breach of an oath or promise. \n\nHmmmmmmm... Me thinks this duth sound familiar, regarding current events..
976791
Latin. quod erat demonstrandum (which was to be demonstrated)
171016
Pro hac vice\nThe Latin term "Pro hac vice" means, in a UK legal context: "for this occasion."\nIf you aren't licenced under the BAR association, you can work single cases at a time for way less.
12969
It is the "current state of affairs." The Latin word "status" refers to something that has been "set up" - and is the same word that we get terms like "state," "status" (as in someone has high "status" in a community), and "statue" from.\n\n"Quo" in this context actually means "that was" - it's kind of like the Spanish "que" which is a very fluid term and can have many meanings in many possible contexts. The complete phrase is actually "status quo ante" which refers to some state of existence BEFORE some event. But now we have dropped the "ante" and just use "status quo" to indicate some current state of affairs.
623449
A Rabbi once said something like:\nIt is possible to use the law to interpret the law.\n\nParaphrased from memory:\n • Thou shalt not kill.\n • Whosoever lays with another man's wife... they shall both be stoned to death.\n\nDepending on your interpretation, is it even possible to follow both laws?\nWhich one has primacy?\nIs it possible that the latter rule made more sense when mankind was on the edge of survival?\n\nAgain paraphrased (and probably poorly):\nIf a law in the Torah offends you morally, it is your duty to judge it with the law.\nIf you do not agree with the law but it does not offend you morally, then preference should be to obey.
614884
actually, it was Latin "quid pro quo" meaning "something for something".  It is used a legal term now for something of value given for something else in return.
312542
Ancient. This is the "Law of Superposition. See\n \nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_superposition
839511
The Supreme Court held that "Freedoms of speech and press do not permit a State to forbid advocacy of the use of force or of law violation ****except**** where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is ***likely*** to incite or produce such action. "\n\nThat means that the law is only operative where the criminal conduct is likely to succeed.  This stands in stark contrast to crimes of Attempt, which can be prosecuted even when the act attempted is impossible; for example, attempted Murder against a dead body that the Defendant does not know is dead. \n\nThis requirement that the violence be likely may well nullify the entire statute under the Void for Vagueness doctrine.  How are police supposed to know when it is likely to succeed?
230630
If you mean the actual law, it is constitutional law.  If you mean the best for understanding interpretation of those laws than try books on law from your local library.  Most are written for laymen rather than for lawyers.
833206
I have no idea of the context, but this is the translation:\n"you, la Bruyère and Tori cannot judge me. Leave the table of multification to God"\nThat last part does not make sense to me. May be the "table of multification" is a french expression for something like "final judgement". \nGreetings from Holland!