i want to know why some people don't want their child get immunization?
358250
Depends what the vacccination is. Some of them are said to have illness connected to them, but a lot of them have not been proved yet.
58232
I agree with Nurse Annie -- never get immunizations when you're sick -- or even the sniffles.  Also, it would be the same if the nursing mother was sick and it was time for the nursing child to receive shots.
959668
I think it should be an informed, adult choice, not enforced on another person's body, especially children by others unless for medical reasons as you say.
955027
The sole advantage of vaccination is to the drug companies who are making a fortune out of a superstition.\n\nDo NOT get vaccinated.\n\nA vaccinated person is MORE likely to get a disease than  a non-vaccinated person. The whole theory of vaccination is flawed. It causes a weakening of the immune system thus making those who are innoculated more susceptible to disease.\nThere are so many awful side effects to vaccination that it should be considered extremely dangerous.\nJust sit back and think for a while.\nIs there any sense in injecting a disease directly into your body.\nWe have been subjected to an awful mind control program to enable the drug manufacturers to make a fortune.\n\nThe Vaccination Hoax\nhttp://www.whale.to/b/hoax1.html\n\n\nIf you go to the vaccination liberation web page, at\nhttp://www.vaclib.org/exemption.htm\nYou will find all the forms necessary to provide exemption for your child.\n\nIf you want to study the history of vaccination, see\nhttp://dgwa1.fortunecity.com/body/vaccination.html
706129
You are half way there!\n\nDo NOT get vaccinated.\n\nA vaccinated person is MORE likely to get a disease than  a non-vaccinated person. The whole theory of vaccination is flawed. It causes a weakening of the immune system thus making those who are innoculated more susceptible to disease.\nThere are so many awful side effects to vaccination that it should be considered extremely dangerous.\nJust sit back and think for a while.\nIs there any sense in injecting a disease directly into your body.\nWe have been subjected to an awful mind control program to enable the drug manufacturers to make a fortune.\n\nThe Vaccination Hoax\nhttp://www.whale.to/b/hoax1.html\n\n\nIf you go to the vaccination liberation web page, at\nhttp://www.vaclib.org/exemption.htm\nYou will find all the forms necessary to provide exemption for your child.\n\nIf you want to study the history of vaccination, see\nhttp://dgwa1.fortunecity.com/body/vaccination.html
251237
I personally don't want children, and I have very good reasons for choosing not to. However, some people have very good reasons for choosing to have them. In developed countries there is little worry by the elderly of growing old in poverty because of various pension programs, both private and public. Many therefore choose parenthood not for economic reasons but because they have an emotional need to shower a child with love and affection, as well as the desire to pass on the family name. I personally don't want kids because I enjoy the freedom of singleness and look forward to marrying a woman who also doesn't want kids so that we can enjoy life to the fullest together. Also with all the uncertainty of world events, I'm very apprehensive about bringing a child into it. No I don't think it's unnatural to choose to remain childless, it's a personal decision and nobody should be criticized for either choosing to have or to not have kids. There's many naysayers who decry the end of "Western Civilization" because of the fact that many people in developed lands choose childlessness, but it would be better to instead focus on how the birth rates of these nations could be lowered and the living standards improved for these people. So I hope I have answered your question, it was a good one.
1135957
Some illnesses/medical disorders can ONLY be cured by surgery or a medical intervention. It's not a matter of crossing your fingers and hoping that your child doesn't die. If you are truly religious you would realize that God has given people the ability and intelligence to be physicians for a reason. I think anyone that denies their child medical care for 'religious reasons' should be charged with neglect and attempted murder. There have been way too many cases of children dying from people that have distorted religious beliefs.
507028
As the father of an Autistic daughter, I can say with no doubt whatsovever that the MMR vaccination trigered my daughter's Autism. She came out of the Pediatrician's office after receiving this mutiple vaccination and began banging her head on the ground, screaming at the top of her lungs. She screamed and banged her head on the ground for about a year after that vaccination. The Pediatrician said it had nothing to do with the vaccinations... He was a liar. They know and vaccinate anyway. \n\nA child's liver is not even fully developed or capable of handling the 72 plus toxins administered to a child by the the time they are six months of age. Ethical doctors in the past would never vaccinate a child less than six months of age. In addition, a child's brain is not fully developed until they are closeer to two years of age. Pediatricians know their window of time they have with children in their care is limited so they have to begin at birth administering vaccinations and keep every child they can get into their office on the deadly vaccination schedule to make a living.\n\nAt the very least a parent should not give their children any vaccinations until they are at least two years of age but I think that age five would be a better age as most Austism begin before age five. Then consider that most vaccines that are supposedly designed to prevent diseases cause more of the diseases to those who are vaccinated than occurs to those who choose not to vaccinate.\n\nIf you do the least little bit of research about vaccines, you would never abuse! your child with poison but doctors today are not ethical. Who do you think is the least likely to vaccinate their children? Answer: Pediatricians.\n\n\nBecome educated about this issue. You think it will not happen to your child...
789784
we don't.\n\nDo NOT get vaccinated.\n\nA vaccinated person is MORE likely to get a disease than  a non-vaccinated person. The whole theory of vaccination is flawed. It causes a weakening of the immune system thus making those who are innoculated more susceptible to disease.\nThere are so many awful side effects to vaccination that it should be considered extremely dangerous.\nJust sit back and think for a while.\nIs there any sense in injecting a disease directly into your body.\nWe have been subjected to an awful mind control program to enable the drug manufacturers to make a fortune.\n\nThe Vaccination Hoax\nhttp://www.whale.to/b/hoax1.html\n\n\nIf you go to the vaccination liberation web page, at\nhttp://www.vaclib.org/exemption.htm\nYou will find all the forms necessary to provide exemption for your child.\n\nIf you want to study the history of vaccination, see\nhttp://dgwa1.fortunecity.com/body/vaccination.html
360972
a lot of people are still either ignorant or stubborn.  and some believe that since they are healthy they couldn't get it. oh well, let's just pray that some cure would be out soon so people can enjoy the gift of sex without worry.
560727
Please please immunize your children.  If you don't you are setting them up for being infected with some very infectious and debilitating diseases.  \n\nI had polio as a young child.  The vaccine was not being distributed then.  People worldwide think Polio is a thing of the past...well it is not!  Last year quite a number of children got polio right here in the USA.  \nPolio is very very contagious.  Just imagine someone who is carrying the disease lands in NYC and children who have NOT had the vaccine come in contact with this person.  \nWe can have an epidemic all over again...\n\nWouldn't that be fun?\n\nSo use your heads parents...!
867933
Despite what people say, the vaccine does not make anyone sick.  It is more likely, due to timing of flu shots that they already had a little cold coming on, or that their body had an immune system response that left them a little tired and run down, but not really sick.\n\nOr they are allergic to eggs.  They could also have an allergic reaction to the flu shot as it is grown in eggs, but that allergy is often a very serious allergy and can be life threatening.
981649
The same reason people promote abstinence-only sex ed and refuse to allow for distribution of condoms to minors--they are deluded into thinking that if we don't talk to our children about sex, they won't have sex.  Clearly, that's not working--we need to equip our children to be able to protect themselves.
451184
there should be less and it keeps getting worst... don't they learn at school to f... use a condom and protect themselves??.. not only because of pregnancy but mostly because of aids and all that... there's so many small children that end up coming to this world infected because their mommy and daddy didn't take the time to protect each other... that pisses the hell out of me... \nparents should take responsability too... teach and talk to ur kids about it.. this can be provented!!
221631
I have had to do this.  I had to go the the places she was immunized and have them make copies of records.  It took some time but we got it done.  If the doctor has retired, you need to find out where the records are.  Call the doctor at home.  They can also do bloodword to find out if the child has been immunized but this can get very expensive.  Sometimes people  have to get re-immunized if they just can't find any record at all.
1079817
That's one of the reasons I'm pro-choice. Abortion may be the wrong personal choice for me, but who am I to tell someone who can't afford the medical care to have a child -- much less care for it after birth -- that they must have one?\n\nOn an semi-unrelated note -- Ever notice how it's the people who are against abortion are also the ones against educating about birth control in schools and also usually -- but not always -- the ones most likely to limit welfare benefits?\n\nAdoption is nice, but since everyone seems to want to adopt perfect little babies -- not kids whose parents have abandoned them, or kids who have spent time in the foster care system -- it doesn't seem viable to have that as the only solution. **EDIT to clarify** My point here is that even when people do decide to adopt, they often overlook or choose not to adopt at-risk or high-needs children, older children or children who have been  in the foster care system. So simply saying every child that would be aborted should be put up for adoption doesn't seem a viable solution to me.
667560
Having children by two adults who love each other and want to expand their love onto their children is a good reason.\n\nHaving a child to try and keep a spouse is a very bad reason\n\nHaving children thinking it's going to solve your problems is a very bad reason\n\nHaving children because you are lonely and needing love, is not a good reason\n\nHaving children because you screwed up and didn't use birth control, is a sad reason.\n\nHaving children to entrap someone is a sick reason..