Windows CE .NET 4.2 Development with Visual Studio 2005??
367983
the VS 2005 emulator can run any Win CE or Pocket PC OS. If you can get your hand on Platform Builder, you can build the same OS your device has and happily run it on the emulator. HTH..
617375
Go to the MS site and run an eval to see if your sysytem will work.\nSite also has instructions for the upgrade actions.
936394
Here you go\nhttp://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/reference/win2k/setup/changeUI.mspx\n\n///
1158317
Your best bet is to go to Microsoft Downloads and download their compatibility wizard on your machine first, it will tell you what you have that won't work before you start. I am using the 64 bit version now and I love it.
480057
it is very easy. go to package and deployment wizard which listed alongwith other options in start>>Programs>>microsoft visual studio>> and follow the instruction.
569820
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/whyupgrade/win2k/w2ktows03-2.mspx\n\nhere's the official whitepaper
957300
Net framework 2 is out now so install that instead. Its not that important but if you want to run certain apps it is nessasary but if you are running without it at the moment obviously everything you use dosent need it.
205058
Visual Studio.NET or one of the free "express" developers such as Visual C# Express.  Visual Studio costs money but the express IDE's are free.
666736
executable which u have of a .net desktop application is actually not a true executable. It contains CIL (common intermediate Language) code. So it needs .net framework to run, which compiles it just in time (when the exe is clicked) and then runs it.\n\nIf .net application is build using .net 2003 then it will going to need .net framework 1.1 and if it is build using .net 2005 then it will going to need .net framework 2.0\n\nYou can check in Add/Remove application whether the .net framework is installed or not.
514063
Check this out.  It is talking about VS .NET 2003 but should get you the needed information.\n\n\n\nhttp://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/previous/2003/sysreqs/default.aspx
927738
Whilst there is no built-in C compiler (and never will be) you can download and install the .Net SDK from Microsofts website which will provide you with the ability to compile for .Net (C++, C#, VB, ASP) architecture.
590715
Just right click the shortcut of the program icon and then go to compatibility. There you can use Win 95 /98 Compatibility\nYou can use this feature only in win xp
357354
When you reopen your program make sure that you have opened the project file using visual studio and not just the .cs file because without the project file you will not be able to compile or run your project\n\nhope this helps
527334
First, it helps to get a background on the language.  Inside C# by Tom Archer (Microsoft Press publishing) will give you a good background.\n\nNext, you will need to get the compiler.  You can either get the Visual Studio 2005 Express Edition (for free) from Microsoft's MSDN Website or, alternatively, you can get the .NET Framework SDK (which comes with the compilers) and use an alternate IDE, such as SharpDevelop.\n\nThe .NET Framework SDK comes with several pieces of sample code that demonstrate the various .NET APIs and technologies.  Also, you can download the 101 Code Samples for C# from Microsoft's MSDN site.\n\nWhen you have questions, you can visit the other community sites to post questions, look for user samples and articles, etc.  I've include the links to all below:
451495
Best and easy to use is Visual C++ Express 2005 (it's free)http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/visualC/default.aspx\nand you can get complete information on Microsoft's Vc++ from http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/ infact there are video lessions and how Do I.. Guides at http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms177549\n This will be the best compiler to use  as you are doing development in windows xp . As it will provide you with good API's (IT's a COMPILER + IDE)\nThere is another free compiler http://www.bloodshed.net/devcpp.html . It's a good compiler , if you want to be vendor neutral.\nThere is another free compiler called GCC (this is a GNU compiler (i.e Open Source and free too) you can get complete information on this from http://gcc.gnu.org\nand you can download the compiler from http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html\nWith this compiler you can do development on many operating systems with the same toolset.
1020786
If you are developing for the .NET Framework then without question use C#. It will go much smoother than trying to use managed C++.  C# is in general a much easier, less error prone language to develop in. I would only choose C++ for those portions where you need very efficient code. or where you need to port to non-windows operating systems.\n\nOn any windows based project today I would do it in C# using .NET. then after I had everything working. If and Only If  I needed better performance. I would determine the critical sections of code and only if needed redo only those parts ( hopefully small ) in unmanaged C++.  There are tools such as reflector which can help change the language if needed.\n\nBy the way I am currently working on a large project which has both C# and C++. I have over 15 years experience with C++ and maybe a year of experience with C#. There is no question that C# provides significant benefits over C++ in terms of reliability.
917939
Yes. and it must be .NET framework 2.0