in the history which armies defeat the us ?? at the and of the war....?
372806
Well, in terms of war or battles?\n\nAs far as war goes, the USA never lost a war.  In terms of battles, Germany, Japan, England, China, and the Confederacy.  The closest to loosing a war was 1812, against England.  We also lost a few naval engagements against the Barbary Pirate States, but won all land engagements.\n\nAs far as the guy above me, NATO and western Europe did not invade the soviets at the end of WW2.  The soviets would not return former independent nations to their own autonomy, claiming it created a buffer zone to prevent western invasion.  This was called the Warsaw Pact.  NATO was created in response, on a theory of containment.\n\nWe did land troops in Russia, after the revolution against the monarchy.  There were two governments, a Democratic and a socialist one.  Our troops never engaged, only advised.  Obviously, the socialists won.  This was at the turn of the 20th.\n\nIn Vietnam, the USA won every single battle with the NVA.  Public support eroded at home, so we pulled out.  It is said about Vietnam...."from the jaws of victory we pulled defeat."
1024061
The truth is it is the United States of America who is the real terrorist in Iraq.  We will end up like Vietnam. On the losing end.
977454
Welll, this site offers info about this battle, as well as an eyewitness account by an officer on George Washington's staff.  Scroll halfway down the page for the eyewitness account.\n\nhttp://theamericanrevolution.org/battles/bat_tren.asp\n\nAlso, the following site describes the lives of the soldiers and cites entries in their personal diaries about their conditions and view of the war:\n\nhttp://www.americanrevolution.org/soldier10.html
223332
Which war are you referring to. If you want an answer, you have to give more information. Click the Add Details link and explain what you are asking.
698393
Since independence, the US has lost ALL long wars (1+ years) it started:  \n\na) 1812\nb) Vietnam\nc) Beirut\nd) Iraq\ne) Afghanistan\n\n(Civil wars don't count.  How exactly do you lose a civil war?)  \n\nIf it's not a quick and easy win by overpowering force, the US does not and has never had the stomach to "stay the course".  The US only attacks "easy targets" (eg. Philippines, Mexico, Grenada), and in all five cases, the US assumed they were easy targets and learned the hard way.  (The US even managed to lose a short war against an "easy" target: Cuba.)\n\nThe US has never "won" long wars either.  In both World War I and World War II, the US ran and hid until they were forced to get involved (i.e. the US didn't start the wars), and in both World Wars, it was the British and Russians together who won them, and NOT the US.\n\nThe US may have technology, numbers and dollars to win, but it has always lacked - and still lacks - the three most important things it takes to win a long war: heart, spine, and stomach.  The US doesn't have those, while the Europeans, Africans, Asians and the muslims do.\n\n\nAdditional:\n\nThe US hasn't won any wars in 30 years.  As I said above, if it's not a quick and easy invasion, they won't do it.\n\nI also notice a lot of negative ratings for my answer.  That's the yanks for you, they never could deal with the truth.  (They still can't admit their own country's behaviour caused 9/11.)\n\n\n.
709209
The American Revolution.\n\nTimeline of the American Revolution.\n\nhttp://theamericanrevolution.org/tline.asp\n\nhttp://www.cvesd.k12.ca.us/finney/paulvm/foyer.html\n\nLexington and Concord.\n\nApril 19, 1775. "The shot heard around the world" was the first battle of the American Revolution.\n\nhttp://www.earlyamerica.com/shot_heard.htm\n\nThe American Revolution, also known as the revolutionary war, was one of the most significant events in American history. Without it, the United States of America may not have come into existence. Read on and learn why it happened, and learn about key events of the revolution. Also check out our links to other sites on the American Revolution.\n\nhttp://theamericanrevolution.org/\n\nhttp://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/revolution/\n\nhttp://edtech.kennesaw.edu/web/amrevol.html\n\nhttp://www.mce.k12tn.net/revolutionary_war/american_revolution.htm\n\nhttp://www.kidskonnect.com/AmericanRevolution/RevHome.html\n\nhttp://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/revolution/index.html\n\nhttp://www.ecsu.ctstateu.edu/depts/edu/textbooks/revolutionarylinks.html\n\nhttp://members.aol.com/TeacherNet/RevFAQ.html\n\nhttp://www.pbs.org/ktca/liberty/index.html\n\nThis site has everything..!!! Perfect for A P American History.\nAmerican History:  \n\nhttp://www.historyteacher.net/AHAP/AHAPCourseMainPage.htm\n\nhttp://www.historyteacher.net/AHAP/Weblinks/AHAP_Weblinks20.htm\n\nhttp://www.fordham.edu/halsall/\n\nHistory and Social Science.\n\nhttp://www.kidsolr.com/history/index.html\n\nGeneral Resources \n\nhttp://www.ushistory.org/\n\nGood luck.\n\nKevin, Liverpool, England.
649987
Mexico...defeating the French army In puebla ...some general ZARAGOZA did it...\nMexican independence in in the night of september 15
391058
Afghanistan,against Russian invaders.\nthey fought for a full decade!\nwatch out AMERICA.
372246
(m)\n\nThe historical view: By Allan Little\n\n \n\nGet ready to be shocked. Prepare yourself to be awestruck. For shock and awe are what the United States military say they hope to achieve in the opening minutes of the coming campaign against Iraq.\n\nIt will – if it goes to plan – be a war like none the world has ever seen. Washington is about to test drive the early prototype model of a military juggernaut that will be so powerful that it will eventually make any talk of ‘military balance’ redundant, even laughable.\n\n\nIn Washington, where the talk is all of “power projection”, a new ideological conviction is taking shape. It is being driven by technological advance. Technology, increasingly, is shaping what America can do, how America defines itself, and how it engages with the rest of us by providing the means to impose its will through sheer force of arms anywhere in the world where it feels US interests are threatened. \n\n\nThe sheer scale of American supremacy is written in the numbers: the US military is larger than the next ten national forces combined. Its annual budget is 400 billion dollars. It has five hundred bases. And still this is not enough. The Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is planning such sweeping changes in the military that they amount not to radical reform, not even to a revolution – but to transformation. \n\n\n“What we’ve got now is a kind of third age of the American military,” says Michael Clark, “a globalised military that can now do pretty much anything it wants. And we’re also seeing the development of a political ideology which backs up that military dominance. And that’s a pretty uncomfortable situation for the rest of us to be in. For the rest of the world it’s rather like being in a bath with an elephant – no matter how sensitive the elephant tries to be, the rest of us in the bathtub are going to feel pretty uncomfortable.”\n\n\nWashington’s current impatience with its reluctant allies emerged first in the seventy-eight day air campaign NATO fought in Kosovo four years ago. Many of the allies were squeamish to begin with about going to war at all. France intervened to impose political restrictions on what the military could do, to declare some targets – not matter how militarily legitimate – politically unacceptable. Many senior US generals came away from that experience feeling bruised. General Mike Short, who commanded the air campaign from Italy, told me “I never fought a war by committee before – I don’t want to have to do it ever again’. \n\n\nThe talk now shifted from formal coalitions of partners bound by Treaty, towards informal short lived partnerships of expediency – so-called ‘coalitions of the willing’. \n\n\nThat impulse toward unilateralism only reflects what is happening technologically. America is entering a new age of hi tech weaponry – of precision bombing, of lazar guided missiles, of aircraft dropping bombs in the Gulf, while the pilot sits a thousand miles away or more – possibly even in the Pentagon and going home to his wife and kids in a Washington suburb at the end of his day’s remote controlled combat. \n\n\nI asked a US Air Force General about the transforming power of pilot-less aircraft. And it brought me a swift ticking off. “They won’t be pilot-less. They’ll have a pilot. He just won’t be in the plane”.\n\n\n“The accuracy with which modern aircraft can attack their targets is astonishing”, says the military historian John Keegan. “They can at last do what they always said they could do. They always said they could hit a target from 10,000 feet and it actually wasn’t true – they were always missing. There was a very high inaccuracy factor – there isn’t any longer. Weapons are so accurate – nowadays when an aircraft wishes to hit a target it does hit it.”\n\n\nThere is a battlefield National Park on the outskirts of Washington DC at a place called Manassas. It was here,
444329
What War did you fight in? Our President did not make a mistake, He took the war to them, Have you forgotten 9-11, Thank God we have not been attacked on our shores since. Besides it's something you idiots don,t think about, Iran we are now right next door. Think about it. I'll Ask again, I'm a Marine, What War did you fight in?
800741
The answer is simple - The rest of the world.  \nThe US has never won a battle except when it was fought on the back lot of a Hollywood Studio!\nThey go on about how they Won WWII but they where just a small part of the "Backroom Staff" on the scale of things. The only good thing about US Forces, is the size of their "Expendable Resources" both equipment and grunts!\nOn the other hand, they would win a contest of "Who shouts loudest and sounds most intimidating"
1087343
Too bad that there wasn't a way to make them both lose. Iran vs. Mexico, it should have been named the "Down with America" game because they are both out to destroy us in two different ways. The Mexicans are destroying our economy and our country from the inside out, while Iran wants to blow us off of the map. Screw them both.
1131619
Woe.....hey....why stop at WWI .....how 'bout the civil war. The revolutionary war.
828255
Switzerland, but they've always kept well out of any military involvement. The don't even have much of a standing army, but every man is trained in the use of guns, and guerilla tactics.\nThe US will go the way of all empires, the bad thing about this, from a European perspective, is that they probably will drag us down with them. It is not really wealth that destroys a nation, but relentless expansionism, as the US has practised ever since its founding.
822353
in history it was the battle american beat the british and after that battle they convince the french to go on their side and after the french became allies with US so did the spanish, so it was a battle that america won and convinced other countries to be in their army.
573032
Here is what a reviewer on Amazon has to say on the topic.\nhttp://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000069HSP/102-7802541-0853764?v=glance&n=130\n\n"As for accuracy to what occurred, a group of soldiers that were there appeared on The History Channel's "Hollywood vs History" program and they concurred that it was 75-80% factual. 20 - 25% Hollywood. That's probably a good ratio indeed."
511821
North and South. Union and Confederate, it was the war over abolishing slavery. The Confederates left the United States, and started the own government as rebels and traitors. The Confederacy had it's own money (currency) and President, although I can't remember what his name was. The North (Union) defeated the South in the Civil War, and reunited the United States. So look up the Civil War on the Web through "Ask Jeeves". Good Luck.