I watched MEET THE PRESS today and they used the term "THEO_CON" whats that mean?
360848
Theocratic Conservative.  Otherwise known as the religious right.
959268
The term means "New Conservatives". Their ideology differs somewhat from that of the "Old Conservatives", whose  belief system is more consistent & above board. In other words, the real neo agenda is more hidden than the old conservatives'  agenda.\n\nThe original Conservative ideology was for government to stay out of the affairs of the private sector. They acted on the belief that business & individual matters is best left left with the people & not in government. The neocon record speaks for itself. Though they pay lip service to this philosophy, The actuality is, never before in this country has the Govt been more intrusive, at the expense of small business & the public at large.\n\nOpen mindedly comparing the records of Presidents Eisenhower, Ford & Reagan with Bush, Cheney, & Robertson will show the truth of this argument.
20666
I would find it highly likely that 1) it's a gimmicky phrase; or 2) it's an outright fake.\n\nDo a little reading on this guy,\n\nAnalysis of Kevin Trudeau's "Natural Cures" Infomercial (2004) by Stephen Barrett, M.D. \nhttp://www.infomercialwatch.org/tran/trudeau.shtml\n\nWikipedia entry\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_Cures_%22They%22_Don't_Want_You_To_Know_About\n\nKevin Trudeau Banned from Infomercials\nhttp://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/09/trudeaucoral.htm\n\n20/20 Report "King Con? Bestselling Author Selling Questionable Cures to the Desperate and Gullible"\nhttp://abcnews.go.com/2020/Health/story?id=1527774\n\nSkeptic's Dictionary\nhttp://skepdic.com/trudeau.html
1003092
www.theonion.com\n\nIt's fake news, satirical, very funny
132563
ACLU (AntiChrist Lucifer's Union) propaganda\n\nWell....you asked
1040462
Sounds like its a slang term for a test. like POTUS ( president of the united states )
1170599
GW is not a homo and would probably smack the college out of you for suggesting it. Karl Rove may have experimented with his own butt a few times.
658500
Dear Theo,\nYour pertinent question and urgent curiosity has unfortunately, been buried under more legitimate concerns. If you don't get an answer within 24 hours, it is best to delete your query and ask again.\nTheo, I would like to take this opportunity to express my personal opinion. You have been foolish, Theo. Very, very foolish. Anyone can see that the purpose of Yahoo! Answers is to serve as a modern chatroom. More and more, Java programming is becoming less and less supported, there is no other method of bringing people together in a social environment than to create PHP scripts where the "thinking" can be done on the server rather than on your machine. With that in mind, Theo, you should interrogate the shallow-minded participants of Yahoo! Answers with matters that appeal to their common denominator. Questions such as, "How long is the normal tally whacker?" or, "My boyfriend says I should dump my hubby, what you think?"..., would get you a substantial number of replies.\nGive up your pursuit of truth and petty wonders, Theo. Quit asking bland, colorless questions. Are you naive? No person who is capable of giving you the answer you hoped for can last while reading though a heap of puddings, pies and pastry. I'm only doing you a favor, Theo, by giving you a proper admonishment you can now begin to formulate an apology. When you are ready, send your atonement to http://surveys.yahoo.com/user_ad_feedback \nAnd Theo, if you insist upon asking serious questions, remember that a few good jolts from a peace officer's tazor should bring you around to your senses. Please, check your spelling and throw some slang into the mix so you don't offend any of the egos lurking, waiting to pounce on you with crass, thoughtless one-liners.\n\nThank you Theo, and have a great day!\n-Cody
1174079
Actions explain philosophy. Yahoo selectively chooses news stories and gives them leftist slanted headlines. They are more than happy to work with every despot in the world and use their product to advance that governments perverse agenda. That in and of itself  shows their dirty red liberal agenda.
915514
"Put God in the centre:\nHis pure representatives guide the leaders..\nThe leaders lead the country in a divine way..."\n\nDo you have any idea how much that sounds like the Taliban ... or the current theocracy in Iran?\n\nDid you translate this from Arabic or Persian yourself?
412992
Essentially it's saying (at least to me)...\n"My kind are conservative, we have basic family values, and we're a little bit ignorant (but we don't really care)... and we're upset because our kind isn't looked at favorably by Hollywood and corporate media... and not even by Dubya and his corporate butt-kissers.  But we're going to keep doing what we do and thinking what we think, regardless."\n\nMy take on it, at least...
476770
Its just right wing fear mongering.  That is one of the things they are good at.  I thank my stars we live in a country still where you have the freedom of speech, the right of assembly and the right NOT to have a religion if you choose.  Its also a freedom FROM religion. \n\nI am reading posts here that seem to support a theocracy and are not content to mind their own business.   I have no use for Talibornagain Christians.  I don't get all this gay paranoia in our society.
1074307
Yes, it's a hoax and complete satire.  It's making fun of fundamentalist Christian groups.
146625
It has no real meaning, it is his little "catch phrase". They tried to imitate it in English as "believe it".
757543
no...hell no...Bush's desire to set up a plutocratic theocracy was stopped Nov 7...thank God!\n\n\nThe paranoia hasn’t yet burned down to embers. The term theocrat has become a commonplace, employed by bomb-throwing columnists, otherwise-sensible reporters, and “centrist” Republicans such as Connecticut’s Christopher Shays, who recently complained that the GOP was becoming the “party of theocracy.” And now the specter of a looming Khomeini’ism has migrated into the realm of pop sociology, producing a spate of books with titles like The Baptizing of America, Kingdom Coming, Thy Kingdom Come—and, inevitably, American Theocracy, the Kevin Phillips jeremiad that shot to the top of the New York Times bestseller list this spring.\n\nMost of these books aspire to be anthropologies, guides for the perplexed that lead the innocent reader through what the subtitle of American Theocracy calls “the perils and politics of radical religion.” There isn’t perfect agreement on what to call the religious radicals in question: Everyone employs theocrat, but Kingdom Coming also proposes Christian nationalist, while The Baptizing of America favors the clunky Christocrat. Others have suggested Christianist, the better to link religious conservatives to Osama bin Laden—and of course there’s the ubiquitous theocon, suggesting a deadly mixture of Oliver Cromwell and Paul Wolfowitz.
1103049
It's called Freshmeat only & u can go to overdrive.mtv.com. I LOVE THEO!!!!!
371440
Generally this is the way people show support or opposition to an item on the political agenda.  \n\nDoes it make sense?  Sure it does!  If you can get 10 people in a ROOM to agree on one thing these days, it's saying something LOL!  If you can get thousands, then you are showing unity, and chances are, those that are demonstrating are not alone and people at home feel the same way.  It is an effective way of letting ANY governmeent know what the people thinks.\n\nIs it ALWAYS followed?  Ummmmmm no, and thank heavens (not because of the Iraq war)!  If every protest was heard and followed then every single day a demonstration of gigantic proportions would be held for/against the same issue and then how do we decide.  What's important is - the media attention and the fact that you felt strong enough to protest about an issue.  The rest is up to the guys in the White House I guess. :)