When did the Russian revolution start against Czar and what were the exact reasons with results thereof?
362657
This is beyond the scope of a simple answer, but there were two revolutions, the first in February of 1917 in which tsar Nicholas was overthrown and a Provisional government set up under Kerensky, and a second revolution in October, (or November, depending on which calendar you use) when the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional goverment and established the Soviet state.  Following this was the civil war in which the forces of the Red and White armies fought for control.  The Bolsheviks were holding Nicolas and his family and entourage in a house requisitioned from an engineer, Nicholas Ipatev, in Ekaterinburg, and in July, 1918 when White forces threatened to take the town, the Imperial family was ushered to the basement and shot, their bodies carried in a truck into a forest and dumped first into a mine shaft and then reburied in a shallow grave.\n\nThere are quite a number of books on this subject, and the matter is far too complex and detailed to permit any satisfactory discussion here.
914784
Proletariat was the driving force of the Revolution. The proletariat (from Latin proles, offspring) is a term used to identify a lower social class. In Russia Bolshevik Party that organized the revolutionary movement in its majority consisted from proletariat. You can read more about them at this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolshevik_Party
456498
Revolutions defined as overthrowing the government in power require fighting, b/c the government does not usually want to be overthrown, and they protect themselves with whatever (armies, terrorists, bodyguards, rocks), and while the ones causing the revolution might be powerful, they're seldom powerful enough to overcome this without force.\n  The most current "revolution" that spilled the least amount of blood was in Romania in 1989. But even then the government had the army open fire on some college kids protesting. And the end result was that the dictator was machine gunned down after a mock trial on Christmas day 1989.\n  But some conspiracy theories would say that what happened in Romania wasn't even a revolution but all done by the government.
277917
Ya Russian is agressor till 1980. Now also it is agressor in part of militray .
134364
Imperial Russia is the term used to cover the period of history from the expansion of Russia under Peter the Great, through the expansion of the Russian Empire from the Baltic Sea to the Pacific Ocean, to the deposal of Nicholas II of Russia, the last tsar, at the start of the Russian Revolution of 1917.
1081972
Boris Yeltsin was a good transition.  He was someone that the communists didn't hate, and yet he was not a communist, and forged the way for Russia to survive after the fall of the Soviet Union.  So, he was somewhat of a revolutionist.  However, once he was in power, he was not a very good leader.  It took everyone some time to see that he was not the best man for the job, because of the great changes that were taking place as a result of capitolism.  He had a bad drinking problem, which led to his general dislike, distrust, and inability to lead.
511600
You will have to research Marxist history, Do not focus ont the revolts of 1848 in Europe, Focus on The Paris Commune of 1872, The Revolt of 1905 in Russia, and The Bolshevik revolt. I believe it originated in the Paris Commune. The other two revolts will tie in Vladimir Illich Ulaynov.(Lenin)
580092
like when? the city is 850 years old, and spend half that time being capital of Russia, so lotsa stuff went down.\n\nhere are just some benchmarks that are not so obvious from general history of Russia\n\n1250 - Founded by Yuri Dolgorukii, who ruled Russia from then-captial Kiev\n\n1533-1580 reign of Ivan the Terrible, who finished consolidating power in Moscow. The city witnesses some gruesome medieval-style executions, hence the "Terrible" nickname.\n\n~1610 As a result of civil war after Ivan's death, Moscow is taken by Polish troops, who are soon kicked out by russian militia\n\n~1710 Peter the Great moves capital to freshly Built Saint Petersburg. Moscow become a provincial city\n\n1812 Napoleon invasion. After a bloody Borodino battle, Russians set fire to the city & abandon it.  Napoleon moves in nonetheless, rans out of food and is forced to retreat in the middle of winter, loosing most of his army.\n\n1924 Communists move capital back to Moscow since St-Petersburg (renamed Leningrad) was too close to border with capitalist Finland.\n\nwinter 1941-1942 Battle of Moscow, outgunned Russian troops aided by Russian winter stop Germans miles away front he city and counterattack.\n\n1991 Hard-line communists attempt a coup against Gorbachev's liberalization. Mass protests in Moscow, headed by Boris Yeltsin. Military moves in, but takes the side of protesters, and the coup fails. Yeltsin uses resulting political capital to disband Soviet Union.\n\n1993 Right-wing parliament starts a standoff with Yelstin, resulting in troops moving in again. This time, fighting erupts, ~100 people die and parliament building is shelled by tanks. Yeltsin prevails, parliament assumes "puppy dog" posture from then on.
12304
The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was a Communist dictatorship formed after the Russian Revolutions. It was first headed by Lenin, then Stalin before a succession of more moderate leaders. From 1919 until WWII it "comprised of 11 republics, the RSFSR, Ukraine, White Russia, Armenia, Azerbaidjan, Georgia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikisan, Kazakhstan and Kirghizia. In 1940 Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldavia, and Finno-Karelia became constitutional republics."
156128
McCarthyism happened in the 1950s.  Groups of people (actors, news reporters, etc) were suspected of being communists - with no basis or foundation for the suspicion.  Many people were banned from doing their work because of their suspected communist ties.  This was during an era called the "Cold War" which was between the end of World War II and the mid 1980's.  At this time, the United States and Russia (then called the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics - USSR or Soviet Union) were sworn enemies of each other.  The USSR was a communist state.  When the USSR collapsed in the mid 80s and early 90s the two nations resolved their differences.\n\nCommunism is an economic system where the state owns the means of production, and everybody is supposedly treated equally - as opposed to capitalism (which the USA has) where the more you work the more $$$ you make, and the more $$$ you make the 'better off' you are.
768180
What's your question?  The revolution ousted a Soviet puppet government and installed Imre Nagy.  It started on encouragement from Voice of America.  The Soviets sent in tanks and troops, who thought they were in Egypt to fight the British and French invasion following Nasser's seizure of the canal.  Nagy was executed by the Soviets and Janos Kadar was installed.
124499
By the summer of 1978, a rebellion began in the Nuristan region of eastern Afghanistan and civil war spread throughout the country. In September 1979, Deputy Prime Minister Hafizullah Amin seized power after a palace shootout that resulted in the murder of Prime Minister Taraki. Over 2 month’s instability overwhelmed Amin's regime as he moved against his opponents in the PDPA and the growing rebellion.\nThe former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs "From the Shadows", that American intelligence services began to aid the opposing factions in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet deployment. On July 3, 1979, US President Jimmy Carter signed a directive authorizing the CIA to conduct covert propaganda operations against the revolutionary regime. This information has led to renewed debate over the interpretation of the alleged invasion. Supporters of the US intrusion allege that the USSR's intentions to control Afghanistan were already clear (particularly in their interpretation of the Brezhnev Doctrine). Opponents assert that the US deliberately gave the USSR casus belli to lure them into a conflict that could not be won at Afghanistan's expense.\nFurthermore, the regimes of the USSR and Afghanistan enjoyed comfortable diplomatic relations. Prior to the Soviet deployment, up to 400 Soviet military advisers were dispatched to Afghanistan in May 1978. On 7 July 1979, the USSR sent an airborne battalion with crews in response to a request from the Afghan government for such a delivery. Subsequent requests by the Afghan government related more broadly to regiments rather than to individual crews. With Afghanistan in a dire situation during which the country was under assault by an externally supported rebellion, the Soviet Union deployed the 40th Army in response to previous requests from the government of Afghanistan. The 40th Army consisted of two motorized rifle divisions, an airborne division, an assault brigade, and two separate motorized rifle regiments.
607251
Pyotr Arkadyevich Stolypin (Russian: Пётр Арка́дьевич Столы́пин) (April 14 (April 2 Old Style) 1862 - September 14 (September 1 Old Style) 1911) served as Nicholas II's Chairman of the Council of Ministers (Prime Minister) from 1906 to 1911. He became known for his heavy-handed attempts to battle revolutionary groups and for instituting the agrarian reform.\n\nStolypin was a high-born member of the Russian aristocracy, related on his father's side to the poet Mikhail Lermontov. He had a good education and served in the government bureaucracy. His successes led to him first being appointed interior minister under Ivan Goremykin. A few months later, Nicholas appointed Stolypin to replace Goremykin as Prime Minister.\n\nRussia in 1906 was plagued by revolutionary unrest and wide discontent amongst the population. Leftist organisations were waging campaigns against the autocracy, and had wide support; throughout Russia, police officials and bureaucrats were being assassinated. To respond to these attacks Stolypin introduced a system of military tribunals that held quick trials of any accused rebels. If the accused was sentenced to death, as often happened, the sentence would be carried out within a day. Thousands of Russian radicals were killed under Stolypin's system. The gallows hence acquired the nickname Stolypin's necktie.\n\nHe dissolved the First Duma on July 22 (July 9, Old Style) 1906, after the discontent of some of its more radical members to co-operate with the government and calls for land reform. To help quell dissent Stolypin also hoped to remove some of the causes of grievance amongst the peasantry. Thus, he introduced important land reforms. Stolypin also tried to improve the lives of the urban workers and worked to increase the power of local governments.\n\nOpinions about Stolypin's work are very divided. In the unruly atmosphere after the Revolution of 1905 he had to suppress violent revolt and anarchy. His agrarian reform held out much promise, however. Stolypin's phrase that it was a "wager on the strong" has often been maliciously misrepresented. Stolypin and his collaborators (among whom in the first place his Minister of Agriculture Alexander Krivoshein and the Danish-born agronomist Andrei Andreievich Køfød should be mentioned) tried to give as many peasants as possible a chance to raise themselves out of poverty, by promoting consolidation of scattered plots, introducing banking facilities for peasants, stimulating emigration from the overcrowded western areas to virgin lands in Kazakhstan and Southern Siberia.\n\nIn June of 1907, Stolypin altered the voting system of the Duma, which resulted in his election as Prime Minister. The aim of Stolypin was to create a moderately wealthy class of peasants (the Kulak), who would be supporters of societal order. (See article "Stolypin's Reform").\n\nAt some point in the spring of 1911, Stolypin proposed a bill whose failure to pass led to his resignation. He proposed spreading the system of zemstva to the southwestern provinces of Russia. It was originally slated to pass with a narrow majority, but Stolypin's partisan foes had it defeated. In his anger, he resigned as Prime Minister of the Third Duma.\n\nLenin was afraid Stolypin might succeed in helping Russia avoid a violent revolution. Many German political leaders feared that a successful economic transformation of Russia would undermine Germany's dominating position in Europe within a generation. Some historians believe that German leaders in 1914 chose to provoke a war with Tsarist Russia, in order to defeat it before it would grow too strong. On the other hand, the Tsar did not give Stolypin unreserved backing. In fact, it was believed that his position at Court was already seriously undermined by the time he fell victim to an assassination attempt in 1911.\n\nStolypin's reforms did not survive the turmoil of the World Wa
650442
Alexander Kerensky. Hijacked Russian revolution. Set Russia back 80 years. He was a moderate, and would have allowed democracy to develop in a country where democracy had never flourished.
489027
The bolsheviks over threw the tsar of russia in 1917 they shot him and his family and declared russia a communist state prior to communism it was an imperialist state the revolution was started by men named lenin and trotsky the tsars name was nicholas (thats a very brief overview)
89301
Yes.Exactly.\nWhich Tsar?
533549
As a product of the Russian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic , I hope not. You shouldn't say that just based on a fascinating history or the political theories because I agree that they sound good. The Bolsheviks tried to start it, but all that the Bolsheviks managed to start was a line of totalitarian rulers; it was not true Communism. I am certain you would not be so supportive of Communism if you visited nearly any part of the former CCCP/USSR even today. The grim social ills and decay that the Bolsheviks started in the name of Communism are still obvious. It will take many years to fix that. I am proud of my country and it's history, but I hope it keeps history where it belongs and serves as an example to countries contemplating similar leadership styles. Continual brutality and discrimination cannot last, and when it falls, the country falls into an even sadder state because the citizens do not know what to do without being told.\n\nIn conclusion, people have tried to establish Communist entities in the past, but the reality is that while Communist and Socialist theory sound great, they morph into authoritarian or totalitarian leadership.  That is the exact opposite of Communism.  Communism is an impossibility anywhere; it cannot last.  People need leaders, and Communism cannot provide that or the proper government infrastructure.