Do you think another war is about to break out. WHy? I.E.  U>S> and iran?
364202
Unfortunately yes. We will not suffer another country (that is so full of terroristic groups) to possess nuclear weapons. The threat to our country would be too great, considering we are not well liked (for various reasons). I think a pre-emptive strike will happen in the near future, though the cost of it (economically, politically, and diplomatically) will be immense.
645980
What makes you think that the US is going to invade Iran?\n\nDid you think about this at all?
420045
I don't think Iran will back down and we will probably strike Iran with possible the help of Israel. I think that probably won't happen for several months until all else fells. This could be the start of the tribulation.
864501
Let's all pray he doesn't start another war somewhere to take people's minds off his goofups!\nHe seems to have his eyes on Iran. God help us!
473077
Sure, if they want to start WW III. On NPR a week ago some military guy was saying that in every scenario of an attack on Iran it ended up with a huge uncontrollable war involving the entire middle east. ITMFA!
227977
We probably will go to war with Iran, but not until 2007.  This is an election year and Congress is not going to approve anything which will infuriate the public right before half of them are up for reelection.
262461
There won't be a war until we advance far enough technologically to be a threat to them. Then, they will probably wipe us out because they are well aware of the human tendancy to over take and kill weaker civilizations. Or, they might sanction Earth if we start to develop weapons that could potentially pose a threat.
516444
No way! They're just going to cause more problems. It's like, 'You stab my back so I'll stab yours.' Where does the vicious cycle end? Do they really think that MORE war can bring peace? Retaliation is inevitable. If anything, the world situation's going to get worse.
341405
I think I'm gonna go in the yes column for this one. I don't really see China getting involved, not openly anyway. I think a conflict with NK is approaching quicker than anyone is imagining. When, not if, when we strike Iran the die will be cast. At that point we are left in a giant nightmare of our own design. The mideast in turmoil with our assets being sucked dry and Kim Jong-Il looking at his pie chart of the axis of evil. Iraq down, Iran down, time to hit the button. I'm thinkin' he's not a man to bluff. He has openly stated he will use his nukes pre-emptively against the US.
288874
World War III will happen and the world will suffer!\n\nI am more uncomfortable with Israel having nukes than Iran. Iran wants a deterent from America and its Allies invading them for their oil like we did in Iraq. Yes, Saddam is an asshole and deserves to die but he was never a real threat to us. I don't believe in Bush's answer of we attack to protect freedom and save innocent people...blah blah blah. If that were true then we would have invades China, North Korea or many of the countries in Africa and South America because these goverments are also killing innocents and crushing freedom but there NO OIL THERE for us to take or the country in question can fight back.
133364
Please clarify.  I really don't think you mean Iran is going to invade Iran.
87620
The odds are that a coalition will end up attacking Iran.  They can do alot to "placate" the world, but every day we wait they are getting closer to destabilizing the entire region.  Those who think the military cannot handle another engagement, bullpuckey.  We can call up ALL reserve and guard troops, we can start conscription, and we would WIN!  I hope like hell this does not happen, but America will not be bullied, or allow one country, JUST like Iraq, to threaten the WORLD's (not Cheney's or Bush's) oil supply.  If it was disrupted for any length of time, with a regional war, or by the theocracy in Iran(backed up with Nukes), the WORLD economy would go into instant depression.  \n\nThen who would we blame???  People forget that the entire WORLD needs peace and free access to resources, that way we all can prosper!
289061
I think the Bush administration has already lost all credibility.  I doubt they spend much time worrying about that.\n\nTo answer your question, in my opinion, no, we won't invade Iran.  I don't think the American public is prepared to go along with another war when we're already in the quagmire of Iraq.
528774
What are my ideas? Quite simple. He is going to be the reason another World War will happen. Already there is war in Iraq. If the Iranian President decides to attack Isreal, Isreal will strike back, causing probably Russia and Chian to attack Isreal, which then the US and Britain will get dragged in to fight Russia, China, and Iran. See since there are so many alliances in the Middle East, just like in World War 2, lighting the wrong fuse will cause a big bang that will escalate to World War 3.
1132162
No one day it will happen, probably from war. Its just a matter of time. When? I couldnt tell you.
557497
There is going to be a war with Iran and there is nothing anyone can do to stop it. If the USA does not stop iran they will develope a nuclear war head and get it to the U.S. because they hate American's and freedom, Also they think it will please thier god(who is gay) they are going to have to be B.I.T.C.H. slapped or the west is doomed.
307286
I think there is a strong chance that the War on Terror is going to continue into Iran.\n\n"A recent poll shows six in ten Americans think a new world war is coming: the same poll says about 50 percent approve of the dropping of the atomic bomb on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II. Somewhat inexplicably, about two-thirds say nuking those two cities was "unavoidable." One can only wonder, then, what their reaction will be to this ominous news, revealed in a recent issue of The American Conservative by intelligence analyst Philip Giraldi:\n\n"The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President Dick Cheney's office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States. The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons. Within Iran there are more than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option. As in the case of Iraq, the response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of terrorism directed against the United States. Several senior Air Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the implications of what they are doing – that Iran is being set up for an unprovoked nuclear attack – but no one is prepared to damage his career by posing any objections."