Does anybody know the current death toll from Iraq & Afghanistan of their dead people?
366423
Iraqbodycount.org puts the current death rate (for Iraq alone) somewhere between 34,139-38,280.
1173027
Oh my Fing God. You bastard; you just personaly attacked a veteran with a simple question and called her bloodthirsty. less than 50,000 at most have died, check it, no where close to a million. most have died because terrorists keep blowing them selves  up in mosques and crowded market places. The point was; if you don't realy know ANYTHING about it you shoulden't whine about it
500150
Yes. Hmmm... I wonder why immigration is suddenly such a big deal and the war is on page 6A??? Could it be an election year? Anyway, yeah it makes me sad, but it is also sad that no one ever asks how many Iraqi civillians have died.
559250
I'm not sure that we know. The sources I found said that 30,000 people died, but there are "no detailed records."
1114432
You do hear about it.  The reported death tolls are almost always higher for Iraqis than for U.S. or coalition personnel.  (But it's not "their own roadside bombs."  The people who set the bombs are not usually killed by them.  It's Iraqi civilians or police who are usually killed.)
767513
It's a Civil War and has been declared one by the Iraqi Defense Minister!\n\nActually the "Official" death toll for Iraqi's for those for the past 4 1/2 months is  10,538!  Iraq claims it is lower, though the actual figures show it to be higher. The insurgents, who are Iraqi's, are increasingly targeting women!\n\nI don't have a clue how anyone can claim it is anything other than a civil war as more innocent Iraqi's are dying in 1 day than Americans in 1 month! We claim it is a war! And if it isn't, just what the hell is it?\n\nhttp://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/i/iraq.html
976894
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties/\n\n\nIt's a shame. \n\nSupport our warriors, but not the war.
1028884
Not at all.  We are experiencing a virtual media lockdown.  It wasn't even until very recently until papers were showing ANY dead Iraqis whatsoever.\nYou want to see something else the media isn't showing you?  Try this one on for size.  This information might not be available for long with the downfall of Net Neutrality, so igrore it at your own peril:\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848
397390
Well as to date America has over 17,000 wounded soldiers that are missing arms, and legs, or both. Most of them  the ages 18-25 and it's for the rest of their lives. This isn't including the 100,000 men, women, and children the Iraqi's have lost due to America's invasion. The American death toll in addition the wounded is around 5000. I have gotten this information from the U.S.GOV. web-site. America has absolutely no diplomacy policies or programs going on with the other surrounding Countries that have concerns with Iraq financially in the Middle East region. Iraq's infrastructure is still in shambles, and they really have no way to support themselves without the aid of the United States military. There is also a Civil War going on in Iraq, and Iraq doesn't have any present Government system in place; because they can't agree who's going to be in charge. It's a mess that's what is going on.
772971
I can not speak for the Chechen war, but in Afghanistan approximately 15,000 Soviet soldiers were killed.\n\nWhat is more interesting is the non-letal casulity numbers:\n\n469,000 wounded\n416,000  infected with some sickness such as hepatitus and typhoid.\n\nThese numbers come from the Frunze Soviet Military Academy.
447281
By War on Terror, I assume you mean the war in Iraq? If that is the case, this website will provide the coalition forces loss of life in the war, their home cities/states and how they were killed. It may take some time to count up each individual to get a number for each state, but the information is accurate and reliable.\nhttp://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties/
476192
In the 1991 war, 382 died and 467 were wounded in some fashion.\n\nIn the 2003 war and the following occupation, 2,325 died and 17,467 were wounded in some fashion.\n\n\nThat's not bad at all.
756467
One really powerful primary source about Iraq and Afghanistan is the Sandbox blog on the Doonesbury website.  Every day there are a couple posts by soldiers involved over there.  There is a range of content, but it gives you the sense that there really are good people working hard to improve the lives of Iraqis even though there is also a lot of disastrous stuff happening.  It might open their eyes a little.  I think they'll find glimpses of the good side there, regardless of their politics.
85342
About 651,000 battle deaths. That number is only through the Gulf War so you probably need to add on another 3,000 or so for the wars in Afganistan and Iraq. The website below breaks it down by war.
494184
We will lose the war. ( How many Iraqi people did 9-11?) This is the truth. Shot and killed one day. News for one day. Buried in 4 days. Forgotten forever. Troops!! You are dying for nothing.
611787
Events in Iraq and Afghanistan are out of control and history tells us military efforts in both places are doomed to failure. Now for some reason we Canadians have sent troops to Afghanistan.I understand that sometime in the next year it is expected the Canadian troops will take on the full responsibility for the chaos in Afghanistan in order to free up the American troops for Iraq. What does this mean? More dead Americans, more dead Canadians, more dead Iraqis and Afghan civilians. Billions of American/Canadian dollars spent on a war effort which like Vietnam and even Korea was entered into with no viable exit strategy. Millions more dollars in structural and infrastructural damage to countries that can least afford it. And for what? 50 years later Korea is still divided and North Korea is a ticking nuclear time bomb.40 years later Vietnam has fallen under Communist rule. 5 years later there is no end in site for the war in Iraq and the people there are worse off than when Saddam was the leader. And George W. hasn't even started on North Korea or Iran yet. Yikes,where does this madness end?
1072161
I see that you have posted another question you really don't want an answer to. Stop telling us what we already know. People die in wars. Here are some numbers for you:\n\nTop ten wars with the most US military fatalities: as of 2003\n\n10: Gulf War: 148\n9:   Spanish/American war of 1898: 385\n8:   Mexican war of 1846: 1733\n7:   War of 1812: 2,260\n6:   Revolutionary War: 4,435\n5:   Korean War:  33,651\n4:   World War l:  53,513\n3:   Vietnam:  58,193\n2:   Civil War:  140,414 (Union only: Confederates recorded at 74,000 est)\n\nNUMBER ONE:  World War ll:  292,131\n\nThe greatest civilian losses in all world history are from World War ll: Across the globe, a shocking tally of: 25,568,400.\n\n42,747 Civilian deaths are reported at http://iraqbodycount.net/ and that doesn't compare to the lowest civilian body count of WWll which was 300,000 suffered in Hungary.\n\nCurrent death toll of our service men totals in at 2500 estimate, with changes daily. That currently puts Iraq in at #7 on the top ten.\n\nI don't want to see this war climb to number 6 any more than any one else. Beyond that, what I am trying to say, is that what you are saying has been known for centuries (speaking of the fact that people die in wars) so you aren't presenting anything new and in fact you are just ranting. Yet, I will answer you question by saying this. ONE death from this war, was too many. That is the reality of war. It is hell and good people die. I wish it weren't happening, but there it is. Support our troops, and welcome them home when they come!