How long IT (software) industry will take to reach final saturation point ?
363404
when it reach the point when everyone is connected
465301
I think it depends on how much your workload is. But most programs are about 2 years in length.
1077038
Another worthwhile Idea Labour will rave on about 4 a few months, then abandon after they've ploughed Millions in2 it!\n\nIt's the IT system 4 Social Serivices, like I say millions will B spent on it & as is usual with this wishywashy bunch, they'll shelve it B4 it even gets started.
687277
1 hour or 60 mins or 3600 seconds :-) is the time it takes but it will still be 12:30 :-p
302656
I did the same, It takes up to 3 months...just be patient
947468
This is never a surprise on any revision of software. This was a known from the day of release as well as the Secunia advisories for security issues. The common knowledge to all upgrades, If revision do not install 1-2 months after release, if a major patch 3-4 months if a complete new OS not for one year or until first major patch has been issued. \nMost IT people do not download and use new software especially in a corporate environment until they are sure there are not a lot of problems with the software as it can cause a lot extra work for them.
934395
From what I've heard, it's going to be about 2 hours and 15 minutes long, but it's still in production...I've included a couple websites that can help.
259792
Because it is in starting stage, it will be there soon.\n\nLet is take some time.
1041054
It depends on your state and your company policy. Most likely you will not after only 90 days.
564425
Right now it looks very, very good. The predictions have always been way understated. When you consider that soon, every piece of equipment will contain a computer and software ... we will need programmers until we can program a computer to program!!! That a ways of TG !!! Regards and Good Luck
620457
The latest published date is "First Quarter 2007" delayed from late this year... but even that is up for debate.  The following article was published a couple days ago.\n\nVista’s Outlook Gets Cloudier\n\nGartner predicts Microsoft will ship its upcoming Vista operating system later than the January 2007 target.\n\nMicrosoft’s upcoming operating system Windows Vista is unlikely to ship until the second quarter of 2007, research firm Gartner said Wednesday, suggesting another potential delay that would be profoundly embarrassing for the software giant despite having little long-term impact. \n\nGartner said it now expects Vista to hit the shelves anytime between April and June of next year, instead of January, which is when the company last said it would roll the OS out. Microsoft still has plenty of work to do on the product, said Gartner. \n\nMicrosoft is expected to release Beta 2, or the second test version of the product, next month. Analysts estimate it will take another nine months to turn that into a final product. \n\nVista is the first major operating system to come out of Redmond in nearly five years and is regarded as the most important one since Microsoft released the Windows 95 OS nearly a decade ago. \n\nVista has been through multiple delays. Microsoft was initially supposed to ship Vista in 2005, but moved it to 2006 after it failed to meet internal targets for test releases. In April, Microsoft said Vista would be out in January 2007, instead of fall 2006 as was expected (see Microsoft Clouds Tech’s Vista). \n\nMicrosoft responded to Gartner’s report, saying it will stick to its schedule this time around. “We respectfully disagree with Gartner’s views around timing of the final delivery of Windows Vista,” said the company in a statement forwarded by its public relations company, Waggener Edstrom. “We remain on track to deliver Windows Vista Beta 2 in the second quarter and to deliver the final product to volume license customers in November 2006 and to other businesses and consumers in January 2007.”
460201
TOO EARLY QUESTION..\n94 MORE YEARS LEFT..
1040706
Not sure how long but you will want to look at the site below.
898082
in the long term end.
189475
Of course it will continue in the future. No doubt about that! And one of the main reasons is that some international companies even support this issue. For example compare the system requirement for XP/2003 with the requirements for the new Vista! YOu'll see the major difference. And not only this, all major game developers support this, even finance it.
867489
Can it be done given the time constraints (you need it by when)?\n\nCan it be done given the resource budget (people/equipment/money)?\n\nCan it be done in a way that meets performance and other quality requirements(glitchy bugs, performance, resource consumption, etc)?\n\n(I can also think of a 4th feasiblity tenet -- Is the problem solveable by current (or anticipated) technology?)\n\nWe have a saying in the software industry, you can have it quickly, you can have it bug free, or you can have all of your desired features.  Pick two.
140741
Hopefully the Y2K "concern" forced us to look more to the future in regards to programming and data storage. I think all developments now are just building and improving on previous designs and processes, so there should be greater adaptability.