How do people above the mason-dixon line view the south?
365782
They are just like people anywhere else.  there are a few voices of reason, but they are generally drowned in a sea of ignorance and stupidity.
973772
Hell no. Remember that during the segregation era, southern states hindered the advancement of equality by declaring they were "sovereign states" and didn't had to obey federal law. I support states rights to some limit and I think when states conflict with federal government then we are in trouble.
93265
Well ,it depends on what your status was. If you were a slave, it was pretty bad, if you were from the North it depended on how high in society your parents were. In the South, things were generally kind of rough for everybody. Also, just about everybody knew someone who was in the war, and it was especially difficult for the people who had relatives/friends on both sides of the war.
674658
The Ohio River.\n\nThe Compromise established a boundary between the slave states of the south and the free states of the north... This boundary became referred to as the Mason-Dixon line because it began in the east along the Mason-Dixon line and headed westward to the Ohio River and along the Ohio to its mouth at the Mississippi River and then west along 36° 30' North.\n\nhttp://ask.yahoo.com/20000829.html
471515
reconstruction in the south
224787
Lack of knowledge as to the customs of the South.  It doesn't matter one way or the other what they think.  It makes no difference in my life whatsoever.  I am from the South and am proud of it.  I am sure they are just as proud of being from the North. Don't let them get to you and just keep being proud of the South as you are now.
582924
i have several times..brought some friends along for some trips. In this area we have acient colonial plantation and slave houses just scatterd every where. Some are deep in over grown forrests others are lucky they survived the paving of the new raods they are so close.\nI really enjoy the sights of those old old houses...so much history...but it feels like there are the ghosts of the previous owners watching your every move..not quite hostile yet but wary...enough to give you prickles up your neck.\nAnd how could it be illegal if no one has lived in it for ages upon ages? I mean really why waste the history lesson of how people lived.\nThen the next adventure is to wander into the family grave yards and try make out the dates and writing on the stones...
789028
Maryland is a southern state; it lies below the Mason Dixson line. That's the fact.
149586
There is a new movie out right now about this: CSA.  It is a documentary about life in the US after the South wins, and defeats the North, so that the whole country is run by the South (rather than having two separate countries, a different scenario of a Southern victory.)\n\nThe premise of the movie is that the differences would be surprisingly small.\n\nIt is hard to know how things would be now.  Perhaps of the CSA had been a separate country, it would have faced an eventual and successful slave revolt (funded and supported by the remains of the Republican party in the North) and the CSA would be known as New Uhuru, or something.
500989
few people in the south
365579
About the old south black s
198437
It's Mason-Dixon and there isn't a picture because it is an imaginary line that divided the Northern states from the Southern states during the Civil War.
386096
because we southerners believe we where right ( at least some still do)..as for the term Yankee, it is used for anyone from the north, so don't feel insulted, they are just still alittle sensitive about the north winning..........the only part of the south i thought was really wrong was slavery !!! no man should own another............
913300
The south has always been typically more conservative.  The south was actually predominantly Democrat before the civil rights movement, these were called the Dixiecrats.  Now the Republicans are more interested with lessened government interference in economic matters, and many Southerners agree with these statements.  In the north the population is more condensed into cities, which tends to promote more liberal ideals, while in the south things are typically more spread out, which lends itself to more conservative thinking
1108015
The north is the dangerous part. The south has a few rough spots like any city would anywhere in the world. But the south is where to go if you don't want to get in trouble with Islamic law..
711342
One perspective can be seen in the film, "The Patriot".  It's not the specific location you're speaking of but perhaps that might give you an eyefull.
426718
Would you have stayed in the south if you were a slave?  No.  They were looking for jobs and racial tolerance by going north.