homosexulaity and tantric sex?
367751
Ummmm what about it?????  If its your thing-GREAT!  I say live and let live!  To each his own!  I cannot judge anyone for the way they live their lives!  As long as they r happy who am I to tell them they cant do it?????  Love is love no matter who u love.
937497
Do you want laypersons terms that the general populace might be able to comprehend, or do you want upper level comprehension? :O)~\n\nIntersexes are either genital shapes and sizes not congruent with current dominant standards of genital shape and size preferences.\n\nIntersexes are also people whose chromosome patterns might not be xx or xy (such as xxy or xxxy, or xxxo, or xo, or mosaic meaning a mix of chromosome patters across different cells)\n\nIntersexes are also a mix of both of the above two options.\n\nThe thing about labeling someone intersex, is that when people from the medical community are deciding whether or not to label someone intersex, they often fluctuate as there is not set standard of criterion across the board. \n\nSome use size standards, such as a phallus that is larger than .9cm is too large for a female, therefore if the doctor feels that the [infant] should have been female according to the doctors preferences looking at genitals and /or chromosomes etc the doctor might trim the phallus or remove it (social construction of the female sex)\n\nAnd if the phallus is smaller than 2.5cm and/or the doctor feels that the [infant] would be unable to stand while urinating as an adult, on an [infant] the doctor feels should have been male according to the doctors preferences looking at genitals and/or chromosomes etc, the doctor might choose to do genital reconstructions and possibly hormone replacement therapy to construct the [infant] as a female regardless of chromosomes etc.\n\nSex is on a spectrum, you see, where the categories of male and female are not static, meaning, not absolute categories, but rather made up of cultural preferences, they are invented labels put on varrying places on the sex spectrum in order to validate a cultures claims of categories of sex, to perpetuate the segregation of human beings.\n\nIntersexes are often marginalized or stigmatized by societies in order to preserve the western binary gender and sex systems which declare that there are only two sexes, and only two corresponding genders, that both are biological, and that the placement of certain sex and gender labels on human bodies mean something, signify something, often socially and religeously. For this reason, many intersexes are subjected to cosmetic surgery, isolation, shame, discrimination, invalidation, and less access to vital medical care and information about their bodies. And often when they are given medical care or information, it is in such a way that highlights cultural preferences/standards for "male" and "female" and downplays the validity of a natural human body which does not conform to these cultural preferences.
672644
This is an answer to your question that also touches on a couple of the other answers that you have received.\n\nHomosexuality is sexual attraction to the same sex to the exclusion of the opposite sex.\n\nHomosexuality is as natural as any other form of sexuality.  The traditional natural law argument maintained that homosexuality did not exist in nature, and therefore was unnatural.  Now we know that to be totally false.  Decades long indepth studies have revealed that in fact homosexuality exists in all of the hundreds of species studied; furthermore, among those with pair bonding, homosexual pair bonds occur to the exclusion of any heterosexual mating.  The seminal study in this field is by Dr. Bruce Bagemihl and is titled "Biological Exuberance" it is published by St. Martin's Press and may be available used online.\n\nThe argument that it is communicable -- one of the traditional anti-gay argumetns -- is demonstrably false.  People may deal with their sexuality later in life, but sexual attraction to same sex members combined with a total lack of sexual attraction to opposite sexed members cannot be spread from one person to the other.\n\nTraditionally (pre 1970s) psychology treated homosexuality as a pathology (disease) and attempted, though admittedly without success, to "cure" it  -- that changed in the 1970s, partially as a result of political action, but mostly as a result of a series of studies that convinced most psychologists that homosexuality was, whatever else it might be, neither a disease nor curable.  Hundreds of peer reviewed studies since then have supported the progressive conclusion of the 1970's psychologists and psychiatrists.\n\nToday we have a movement that claims it can cure homosexuality.  Some of what it uses is pop psychology, most of what it uses is religious.  The reality is, now being established by study after study, despite bitter opposition from the practicioners to any studies being performed; that it doesn't, and in fact can't change anyone at all.\n\nThat is not to say that a gay person can't pretend to be straight.  Can't marry a woman, presuming that we are talking about a male (which will ill serve the woman, because real attraction will never be there)  and can't father children.  The whole process of living a secret life of one night stands and hidden trysts while pretending to be straight is the very closet from which gay people are escaping.  It doesn't change what you are -- only lets the bigots feel more comfortable that you are "like everyone else," at the cost of your self-worth, dignity, and character -- and most of your female partner's dignity as well.  To be in the closet is not to be straight, it is to be unhappy, perhaps even more unhappy than being celibate. It is also not to say that a gay person can't decide to live without sex, anyone can do that.  A gay person however is a gay person; and cannot be anything else, not because of pathology, which has been rejected now for over 40 years by the doctors that study homosexuality, but because it is what is natural to him or her.\n\nRegards,\n\nReynolds Jones\nSchenectady, NY\nhttp://www.rebuff.org
678697
I believe what you're asking is "What is Kamasutra?" It is an old East Indian philosophy on the different means (And positions) to please the one you love sexually. There are many books on it.
913049
I'm not sure what you mean by "normal" - if it's for homosexuals and heterosexuals, that covers just about everyone in the world.\n\nHomosexual = someone who is interested in their own gender\nHeterosexual = someone who is interested in the opposite gender
1044427
Nature tells us that homosexuality exists.  Are humans animals?  Are there homosexual humans?  Ergo...?\n\nThe fact that you have not quoted sources is of no consequence to me -- I am willing to take at face value that perhaps the cattle and lizards were setting domination patterns. I am curious as to how the motives of the lizards were determined to be "to humilate"?\n\nty kinney, of course, makes terrfic sense about the differences beetween humans and other animals and would worth be re-reading.  \n\nOf course, without any applicable citation, which would seem to be fairly easy to find, your insistence on the behavior of cattle weakens the argument, particularly when you assert such detail as "the male/male behavior documented never culminates it penetration! therefore it is not sexual in nature."  From your reaction to other posts, I assume you're after some sort of penetration?\n\nI must point out that an insistence on male/male penetration omits other non-dominance behaviors practiced by other animal species, such as courtship. \n\nTREE SWALLOWS:  Full cloacal contact has been observed by Wilson and Bull in  male Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor), complete with  the “ticking” vocalizations which are apparently reserved for  heterosexual copulations in Tree Swallows.  They also note that dominance behaior among Tree Swallows is very different.\n\nLIZARD: A. carolinensis engage in both homosexual courtship and copulation -- with one male exhibiting the male behavior in courting being the mounter and the male exhibiting the female courtship behavior being mounted. Previous studies (Noble and Bradley in 1937) dismissed this as hierarchical behavior, but more recent observations (Cooper, 1977, and Sigmund, 1987) show a more thorough understanding of A. carolinensis society, including polygamy and consistent homosexual behavior in the absence of dominant males.\n\nBISON: Courtship, mounting, and full anal penetration between bulls is common among American bison. My Lakota brothers and sisters call them pte winkte —pte =bison and winkte is the word for two-spirit, their description of the transgendered  in their Nation.\n\nFEMALE CATTLE:  Mounting of female cattle in heat by other cows is common among domesticated cattle.  (Obviously, since no marital aids have been documented, no actual penetration occured.)  The same has not been observed among wild cattle in a study by Queensland College in Australia.  Although stress was cited by the observers, they also admitted the possibility of domestication as a factor -- so perhaps civilization figures into it.\n\nBONOBOS: Barbara Fruth and Gottfried Hohmann observed same-sex genital contacts in wild female bonobos.  They have already been mentioned here, I just thought I would give the citation, even though no penetration happened.\n\nZOO ANIMALS: The penguins, koalas, rabbits and others that have been documented as exhibiting homosexual behaviors have most often come from zoos or domesticated situations.  This does not necessarily indicate a corrupted or aberrant social system, but (Occam's Razor) they can be more easily observed.\n\nHYENAS: Actually, Ploss and Bartels have seen hyenas licking each other's genitals.  Hyenas are of particular interest in this discussion because, according the Bestiary of Barnabus, hyenas were believed to have predominantly homosexual sex, and were associated with homosexuals.  This view was strongly held in the time of Augustine, who was a zealot advocate of conversion.
199066
nopes...they dont have vaginas. homosexuality is an attitude, a personal preferance. it has nothing to do with physical abnormality or anatomy.
651299
A homosexual transexual, I think.
1048507
Transsexuals only have one type of genitalia--either the one they were born with, or the one created by sexual reassignment surgery.  You are thinking of hermaphrodites or intersexed people.
472097
Hi- I am a MtF transsexual and I have some impressive ta-ta's (breasts for you clueless out there). I got a little greedy, told my doc (Thailand docs are the coolest!) to implant me with some big 'uns, and, well, I ended up with a 46 DDDD/G rack- Oy!\n\nAny way, my gay friends all act so jealous that I went ahead and got boobs (Yeah- like being a flat chested girl is supposed to be natural). I jokingly told one of my closest gay male friends that I would be happy to pay for him to get some of his own, but he acted shocked and immediately started back-pedaling on what he said he wanted. (He still likes to wear my bra occasionally- go figure).\n\nI think gay men are very in touch with their feminine side, and want to be more feminine, but getting a sex change seems to cross the line- they still enjoy being men and having their outdoor plumbing, too. I guess that also applies to getting boobs- they may like them, because they are an obvious outer sign of femininity, but they wouldn't actually want a pair attached to THEM. Watch Will & Grace- this theme comes up a lot between the characters Jack McFarland and Karen Walker.\n\nI enjoy it when my gay friend wants to masssage my boobies, though- I know it won't lead to sex.\n\nHope this helps...    =^.^=\n\nOh, and Jom156- you are a spaz fundie retard- the poster SPECIFICALLY SAID "no derogatory remarks", and, well I guess you couldn't resist-
557900
chose one of these\n=> Chemical disturbances in the body\n=> need of attention\n=> Nature's force working through them (for reproduction)\n=> Shakti tatwa in girl naturally attracting towards Shiva tatwa of boy and vice versa
661403
First of all, let a real transsexual (me) ring in on this one.\n\nOk, first a few definitions-\n\nSex is physical and is determined by genes\nGender is the inborn feeling that you are a male or a female\nSexual orientation is who you are attracted to sexually\n\nSex is between the legs, gender is between the ears, and sexual orientation is who you want between the sheets.\n\nThat being said, a person can be born who is physically and genetically male, but through an accident that occurred in the womb, the brain never got masculinized (turned into a male brain). The fetus gets masculinized both physically and mentally by the presence or absence of hormones in the womb. If the hormones are present too early, too late, or the baby is insensitive to them, the baby will not be completely masculinized. Also, it seems that female is the natural, or default mode for fetuses. So, basically, you can have a baby who is genetically male and has male genitals, but who is female mentally. This is what happened to me.\n\nI am a straight woman in a male body, and I am getting surgery to straighten out what happened to me. So, as a straight woman, I am interested in straight men, (or at least bisexual), someone who is attracted to me as a woman.\n\nI am not interested in gay men as sexual partners- they do not appeal to me. I am also not interested in "converting" a man to being gay. It is not in my best interest to convert men to being gay- they want a man with a penis- I am not male, nor do I want a penis or look like a man.\n\nI once had a boy friend who confided in me he was gay, he knew he ws gay, and he hoped that dating me would make him straight. He was disappointed that I was so much like a female- we fought over the same things women and men fight over. We split up eventually- I was not what he was interested in- I am not a man. I have also had a male friend who was painfully heterosexual confide in me that he would have never have considered having a gay relationship, but there was a certain "female vibe" I gave off, and he couldn't stop thinking about me- he told me it drove him to distraction. He also told me that although I had a male body, he found it hard to think of me as a male.\n\nI would hazard to guess that many of the men that were interested in me in a sexual capacity were completely straight, or bisexual- no gay man would be interested in me sexually. Maybe they thought they would "have the best of both worlds", but I disappointed them in that I am completely a female mentally. I may have the body of a male, but not the mentality of one.
945225
Actually, I think that a lot of the gay community that appear to be atracted to either the Asian or Paganistic lifesstyles are not doing it so much for the sex, but for the acceptance of who they are.  THere is a higher number of transgender individuals in Asia than anywhere else in the world.  Why?  Because they are more accepting.  Buddhism, Taoism and even Hinduism do not exclude people based on their orientation like so many CHristian faiths do.  Personally, I enjoy that asian culture and like to have asian themed stuff around the house, but with me, it is more out of respect and personal enjoyment of the culture than an atraction to their males.  I have a husband of my own, and that is more than enough to keep me occupied.  I also did martial arts for may years, which may be part of why the culture appeals to me.
1095589
There is no real answer for that question.\n\nHomosexuality has been around for a very long time but since the 1800s it has been considered taboo and often becomes hidden. Most likely the majority of the world is heterosexual with a large portion of the remainder being bisexual. I have never met a homosexual in my life, all of my "homosexual" friends have been in fact bisexual.
819031
Flesh! hot super smoothe silky perfumed female flesh! Don't wanna sound like the sex addict that I am, but It's been so long, that next time I get some, I will make sure to hit Nirvana at least 10 times...!
726937
BECAUSE OF GROWING VEXATION ON MULTITUDINOUS SEX
1166312
you Can use Annie for it indeed there is a erogenous point in males  on the prostate , actually anal sex in males make More sense than in females since females lack a prostate.