What u all thinks about the nuclear agreement between India & USA?
356438
Well, India has a credible nuclear option with a clear and responsible chain of command. Also, the nuclear option is just a deterrence and India acknowledges the disastrous results of it's usage and will restrain from it's usage until provoked.\n\nBecause there's no more reason for research in nuclear field so it makes sense to reach an agreement to ensure a regular supply of fuel for the power reactors. \n\nThe R&D required, if any, would be in the field of weapons and delivery systems which have no link to this agreement and can go on independent of it.\n\nAs far as playing against Pakistan and China is concerned, the days are past when the world's two biggest economies would think of engaging in war. There's too much at stake for India and China to go to war.\n\nIt's just Pakistan against which India needs to keep it's defences up. Unlike, India Pakistan's economy is in shambles, the nuclear button is in the hands of a General(the government and PM are just puppets) and there are extremists dictatating terms and training Jehadis to spread terrorism all around the world.\n\nI find it laughable when I read an answer that said India invavded Pakistan 3 times!!! It's the other way round. In it's history of 5000 years India has never invaded any country.
874212
What is newclear?is it nuclear Whose deal are you talking about?The USA and whom About what
123340
U will get married when George W Bush dies, triggering WWIII, which will lead to India being the next super power!!!
730232
India is not ready yet. Nuclear arms does not make a country ready for world leadership.
938769
YOU ARE ASKING THE QUESTION WITHOUT KNOWING THE FACTS.  THE BOTH COMMUNITIES HAVE EQUAL ENOUGH PEOPLE IN THE SECURITY OF VIP AND OTHERS SECURITY.  EVEN HEAD OF OUR DEFENCE IS MUSLIM AND HIS NAME IS APJ ABDUL KALAM THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA.
576572
I believe you're right about the US attempting to have India as a strategic ally against China.  India is probably happy to have the US to count on in the event of a problem with China, too.\nThe fear factor of India doesn't make a lot of sense, because India does not have a history of attacking its allies.  The biggest problem for the US, as far as India is concerned, is Pakistan.  India and Pakistan have long had border problems, and the US has been known to step in to play referee on a few of these skirmishes.  Pakistan is also an ally that we need to keep close.
113141
Why do the Americans think the world belongs to them. Who gave  America the right to have nukes and stop others from having them. USA is the only country to have used Nukes in war. \n\nUsa has no right to stop Iran from developing Nukes, like it had no rite to attack Iraq. Why does Isreal get to have nukes ? why doesnt Usa Attack Isreal?? Why does india get american help to develop nukes ?\n\nDude no country has the right to stop others from developing Nukes ... especially the country which has the largest depo of nukes themselves !
861092
No, it means that both of those countries that you mentioned are in CLEAR AND BLATANT violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.\nThe US is not in violation of it.  Neither are the other nuclear-armed countries who agreed to the treaty.\nNorth Korea and Iran would have to have completely peaceful governments in order to develop nuclear technology.  They do not, therefore they SHOULD NOT develop anything nuclear.
63611
Given the rising post cold war competition (and cooperation!) among the US, the EU, Russia, China, India, etc. it's very feasible. Current projects point towards the year of 2030, and even if they're overdue, it should still be within our lifetime.
389648
of course it will! All those years of friction with neighbouring country Pakistan will now have a strong back up!(i.e: Kashmir conflict). Pakistan is already in good terms with the USA so India is scoring good points by having a nuclear treaty too..Another reason why the treaty's important is because the political situation is already unstable enough (i know what im talking about, i live in Lebanon), and the threats to Iran concerning its nuclear activities are opening more eyes on the danger of atomic energy. It was wise to sign a treaty with the US since it dictates (illegitimately) the steps of the Security Council and the General Assembly..
351450
Not at all.  In military and atomic power India is not a puppet like Iraq or Afgan.  Even if the 100 million people walks over, the invation will come to end.  US will not take this kind of invation decision against India or China fearing the population these countries have.
4861
Great thought, friend! \n\nHere ya go - presidentofindia@rb.nic.in
710826
The us has one of the worst histories in upholding treaty obligations, they are made then broken when they can take advantage of it. My people, American indians engaged with the governement in 535+ treaties, all of which were broken by the US at their earliest possible convience, so no never trust a treaty
1157622
how bout we assimilate both coutries nuclear programs so we don't have to waste so much energy.  why everyone wanna be against each other.  why not work as a team to better life.
1049075
My view is that since India has perfected a nuclear weapon, both countries should come to an understanding about how, when, it might be used, and how  secrets should be protected.
923052
Probably not the ultimate answer, but down the road a generation or two, they might look at it as a band-aid approach we used to get us by an energy crisis.\nIt is pretty well documented that usually brilliant discoveries come about when they are looking for one thing and find something else.\nSo, even in India, I doubt that nuclear power is going to be the ultimate solution.
658316
i guess Iran has a right to build nuclear reactors and also if needed nuclear bombs! if US & other western powers can possess it, then why should they maintain a double-standards in askinm other countries from not having it. They let India have it simply bcos it serves their foreign interets. Iran should go ahead with it! FYI, I am an Indian.