Once I-140 approv, my friend told me that counsular processing is faster for adjustment of status? Is it true?
359481
Hi Sujan.  Any application for a green card will only be approved when a immigrant visa number becomes available for you.  Since both consular processing and adjustment of status draw from the same pool of visa numbers, they'll take the same amount of time.
265847
i believe it is 3 yuears.  INS performs a vrey lengthy process.  Asking questions, detail of habits, etc.
64901
Can you clarify your question?  Are you referring to the time it takes the INS to process the application, or the time that you have to file the application?
1036485
During the "teen" years, the neurons and electrons in the brain are experimenting with logic paths. This routing and rerouting takes from 3 to 5 years for the average individual. The know it all phase, is one that allows for freedom of speech, and empowerment, if it were to be stifled, it only comes back in the form of anger later in life. My recommendation is to grin and bear all the abnormalities, and just sit back and enjoy the show!!!\n\nHuggs and Kisses,,,\n\nLonnie
1056837
Yes I have it at the minute, I'm just over a year on with little improvement, my consultant has estimated up to 2 years for recovery.
789150
well kind of....\nit depends on who u talk to. \nand if your gonna be in the towns, its better to have a fast computer
228049
Simple reason because both activities are accessing the same part of the brain!! When you "listen" something, the audio cortex PUMPS information "linked" to that tune to your main CPU ;) which is needed to handle the information from the Visual Cortex.\n\nGonna go lil more mubo-jumbo. When you are looking for an address, your visual cortex is sending information which has to be number crunched and processed thus taking your CPU utilisation to 100%. Think, you wont do this when you are returning home. Because that route/information is already pre-recorded in your brain and you need not process it, just have to "retreive" and "match".\n\nSo if you dont have a HyperThreaded brain, you have to switch off the music while you look for the address.. \n\nYou would switched off the TV/Radio when you get a telephone call too, even if the volume was way down. The reason is the same.\n\nP.S: I too switch off the music while lookin for an address.
10748
either one... you reached a natural frequency and need to change your speed...
790195
It takes a loooooong time. They dont generally exaggerate a whole lot on the websites. That is based on when it is a busy period, but I think it probably takes a little bit less. Good Luck with the immigration process.
212259
the brain is capable of processing 400,000 bits of information a second,we process 2000 what does that tell you?consciously trying to solve two difficult problems at once is unlikely.Good Luck
1046866
If you go to www.uscis.gov and you click on the right on Case status and Processing dates you will be able to select the place that will process the application ( irt might be in Texas since you're from FL - Jacksonville Fl does not process I 130's \nIf it will be processed in TX...that's bad luck since they are only now processing the applications they received in 1999....I hope this helps a bit ....\nBest of luck to you.
1126501
Nope mah there is no way you can get it faster. Marrying a citizen will not expediate your process because you are already a resident, so that won't make much of a difference, The only way I see that you can get your citizenship quicker is in fact to join the military but you say you have already tryed to no avail. Just wait it out time will pass before you know it. Muahzzz!!! .
895054
Guilty as charged. No twinkies for you. I recommend you slow down. Radar is only affected by angulation and then it is typically on your side, not mine.  Go pay your fine.
82859
Well, since I'm not affiliated with Microsoft or Sun, here's my 2 cents.\n\nC#, or any .Net platform program, or any Java program running under JRE should NEVER be faster at complex math calculations than any language that compiles natively.\n\nHaving said that, if the speed limit is 70 miles per hour, can you go faster in a Porche 911 or a Ford Taurus?\n\nYou are going to have to work real hard to convince me that with the speed of computer hardware today, your speed differential between .Net or Java code versus something natively compile is worth it.\n\nMost of the time, even with complex calcuations, I/O is the bottleneck.  But if speed is of that importance, then I'd say it was important enough to prototype the calcuation in both languages and test it out.
96163
No, you can not say this. It depends on the programming of the application. In several benchmark tests a higher clocked single core CPU is still faster than a dual core CPU.\nI found a good article where the two processors Intel Pentium D 820 (dual core) and Pentium 4 670 (single core HT) are put in opposition.\nhttp://techreport.com/reviews/2005q2/pentiumd-820/index.x?pg=1
798004
Depends moderately on the application but generally you'll find bus speed will have more effect as usually the bottleneck is not the processor itself but the pathways into and out of the processor.
663192
The one i was receiving is fact. Here is more info:\n\nEmergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) have used a simple test for identifying stroke victims called the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS). It’s fairly simple and is composed of three basic observations.\n\nCincinnati Stroke Scale\n\nFacial Droop\n\n\nNormal:      Both sides of face move equally\nAbnormal:  One side of face does not move at all\n\n\nArm Drift\n\n\nNormal:      Both arms move equally or not at all\nAbnormal:  One arm drifts compared to the other\n\n\nSpeech\n\n\nNormal:      Uses correct words with no slurring\nAbnormal:  Slurred or inappropriate words or mute\n\n\nKeep the CPSS in mind because I think you can see how the stroke test in the e-mail was developed. Researchers tested the CPSS by giving laypeople instructions over the telephone as they observed mock patients (1). With a trained EMT giving them instructions, the accuracy was over 90%, but to implement this system for all 911 personnel would require massive training and is probably not practical.\n\nHowever researchers from the University of North Carolina developed a test that appears to be based on the CPSS and when tested with laypeople, identified stroke victims with over 95% accuracy (2). It takes less than a minute and is very simple.\n\nThe stroke test consists of three simple parts:\n\nFirst, ask the person to smile--a big smile so you can see his teeth. That identifies any muscle weakness in the face, especially on one side--a classic symptom of a stroke.\n\n\nSecond, ask the person to close his eyes and lift his arms out to the side to shoulder level. If he can’t, that identifies muscle weakness associated with strokes--again, primarily on one side.\n\n\nThird, ask the person to repeat a simple statement to check for slurring of speech. Researchers used several familiar phrases such as “Don’t cry over spilled milk.” \nDuring the study, the last two were more easily identified than the smile test with almost 100% identifying the symptom correctly. The reason may be that unless you know the person, you don’t know what his or her smile normally looks like. The comparisons to the CPSS are obvious and the directions are easy to follow.\n\nThe American Stroke Association does not endorse this test because it’s based on a very small subject sample. Here are the warning signs for stroke promoted by the ASA.\n\nSudden numbness or weakness of the face, arm or leg, especially on one side of the body \nSudden confusion, trouble speaking or understanding \nSudden vision problems in one or both eyes \nSudden trouble walking, dizziness, loss of balance or coordination \nSudden, severe headache with no known cause \nThe warning signs are geared to the victims, but if someone is experiencing confusion, he wouldn’t be the best judge of what his body is experiencing. However, if you feel any of those symptoms, get help immediately.\n\nThe stroke test is geared toward laypeople. They’ll make mistakes in their interpretation of symptoms, but it would be an error worth making if the person is indeed having a stroke. Why? Because the faster the person is treated, the less permanent the damage may be. Strokes can be debilitating, leaving a person speechless and paralyzed. Minutes count and this test would appear to help speed things up. There doesn’t seem to be any downside to it.\n\nWhat do you do if you believe the test is positive? Call the emergency service number like 911 or if not near a phone, get to the victim to a hospital immediately. You may not just save his life--you may help him preserve a good quality of life.\n\nReferences:\n\nLiferidge AT, et al. Ability of laypersons to use the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004; 8(4):384-7.\n\n\nHurwitz A et al. Untrained Adults Can Identify Symptoms of Stroke by Directed Use of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale. Abstract presented at the 2003 International Stroke Conference.