What is Marshall Law and how can it be used?
372143
Madison Avenue really screws things up.  Marshall's Law is a stupid advertising gimmick for Marshall's discount department stores - it's stupid because it did exactly what I predicted it would do, which is get people thinking incorrectly about...\n\nMartial law, which is what you are asking about.  Martial law is basically suspension of civil liberties in the name of complete civil order enforced by a military or police state.  When martial law is declared, it's typically in reaction to civil unrest such as riots or revolution, though it has often been used preemptively by dictatorial-minded governments.\n\nGoogle "martial law" for more.
757332
If they take the debt to court and get a judgment they can get a marshall to collect against his assets, possibly including the car.  (In some states an only car has some protection.)  However, it isn't like his old car where the seller had (presumably) retained a security interest (and title) and so didn't have to jump through as many hoops to get that asset.
28230
This is an interesting question. International law is seemingly in the process of being written. It is tough to decide what really is a violation of international law.\n\nThis also brings up the point of the idea of whether country's are sovereign or not. Is a country bound by laws made by an International group?
941823
Anaky. Its the rule of law that keeps a country going smoothly and provides for law and order its abused at times but history shows those who have good laws in place prosper.
548140
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/hague01.htm\n\nhttp://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/ibasicdocuments/ibasictext/ibasicindex/Pacific%20settlement%20of%20disputes.htm\n\nhttp://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/ibasicdocuments/ibasictext/ibasicindex/Pacific%20settlement%20of%20disputes.htm
504691
Marshall, Thurgood \n \n \n1908—93, U.S. lawyer and Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court (1967—91), b. Baltimore He received his law degree from Howard Univ. in 1933. In 1936 he joined the legal staff of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. As its chief counsel (1938—61), he argued more than 30 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, successfully challenging racial segregation, most notably in higher education. His presentation of the argument against the "separate but equal" doctrine achieved its greatest impact with the landmark decision handed down in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954). His appointment to the U.S. Court of Appeals in 1961 was opposed by some Southern senators and was not confirmed until 1962. President Lyndon B. Johnson appointed him to the Supreme Court two years later; he was the first black to sit on the high court, where he consistently supported the position taken by those challenging discrimination based on race or sex, opposed the death penalty, and supported the rights of criminal defendants. His support for affirmative action led to his strong dissent in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). As appointments by Presidents Nixon and Reagan changed the outlook of the Court, Marshall found himself increasingly in the minority; in retirement he was outspoken in his criticism of the court.\n\nSee biography by J. Williams (1998); studies by R. W. Bland (1973) and H. Ball (1999); R. Kluger, Simple Justice (1976).
538946
To assist in the reconstruction of Europe after World War II. \n\nIn the speech Marshall outlined the problem: "Europe's requirements are so much greater than her present ability to pay that she must have substantial additional help or face economic, social, and political deterioration of a very grave character." He then suggested a solution: that the European nations themselves set up a program for the reconstruction of Europe, with United States assistance.
598702
Legally you can do nothing until he is evicted by the court system.The Marshall will remove him and his belongings.\nThe changing lock bit will only get you sued and you would lose.
7741
Unfortunately, they don't have definite roles. The FBI is supposed to in charge of federal investigations within the country. The CIA is supposed to be in charge of intelligence in foreign nations and against foreign nationals within in the country, though the FBI seems to have jurisdiction over those people as well. The US Marshalls are somewhat more clearly defined. They protect the courts and judges and enforce their rulings. So, for instance, US Marshalls were instrumental in ensuring desegregation. The other federal law enforcement agencies are extremely well defined, being limited to either a specific location (like the Capitol Police) or specific statutes (like the ATF), but there is some overlap with them and all the other agencies. The FBI, for instance, can enforce the same laws as the ATF. The source below has a list of federal law enfrocement agencies. The other aspects of national security are all classified as military, and by definition are only supposed to target foreign nations or foreign nationals in America.
823575
It depends on the reason you want a lien.  If it is for reparation on a civil judgment go to the judge who ruled and ask him for it.  \n\nIf it is a "mechanic's" lien for services, or for filing a debt to you on purchase of the vehicle contact your State Department of Vehicles  In both instances you will have to show proof that the money is due to you.  However, it's fairly simply to do.  The fees depend on that state and county you are in.  \n\nAs far as a Marshall, they are used to serve papers for a pending lawsuit.  Liens are generally mailed.\n\nHope this helps.
745911
the role of law has changed to the "roll" of law,\nie bankroll of law. example: OJ Simpson, Ken Lay,Ted Kennedy, and Micheal Jackson.\nthe law is only relevant to those who are bound\nto live by it.
665921
http://www.iccbooksusa.com/index.cfm?fid...\nhttp://www.llrx.com/features/foreignlega...
859721
They use prior case law, the Constitution, Bill of rights and other federal and state statutes....etc.
931143
Basically the law you are talking about is the theory that an object in motion will stay in motion until another force acts upon it.\n\nMomentum is calculated by multiplying the mass by the velocity of the object.  There are many applications for these caclulations like if you wanted to find out what would happen in a head on collision between two objects.  You would be able to calculate in which direction the two objects would travel after the collision.\n\nAnyway, here is a website that I found for you that explains it completely.
298187
The Geneva Convention sets the standards for international law for humanitarian concerns and deals primarily with treatment of prisoners and civilians during a war. Office or cubicle size is a labor law matter and every state is diferent.
543248
Are you asking about a particular countries set of laws? If so you need to specify. If you are requesting a definition, they are effectively codes of conduct in business and commerce.
348113
http://www.law.emory.edu/IFL/legal/palestine.htm OOPS I thought you meant custody law...doh! by customary law do you mean customs such as society habits http://www.palestine-net.com/tourism/ or customs as in bringing goods in and out of a country? http://www.tppalestine.com/imp&exp/customs.html