Within which latin american countries was liberation theology most prevalant  during the 1970s?
144054
Elsalvador rings a bell.
582618
South America, most of Central America, and the Caribbean
1142266
Latin American culture in general has a tendency to be very male dominated. This "manliness" factor would be called into question by something such homosexuality.
165751
Hard to tell, seeing as how much time has passed. I bet Latin America wouldn't be Catholic, since Spain would probably have been taken over as well. \n\nProbably no Protestant Reformation, either. The world would be quite different.
113941
Well, the first reason was French Revolution. When the notice came to America most people said that it´s time to establish those principles in Latin America.\n\nAnd later, the Napoleon´s conquest of Spain.
363416
Bolivia, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, Venezuala have lef-wing governments. I am not sure how many of them was elected after Bush took the office. However, it is true that there is an anti-American left wing trend in Latin countries. There is going to be election in 10 more latin countries till the end of this year. I guess we’ll see the exact picture at the end of this year. Please look over the following link.\n\n\nANALYSIS: HOW THE US 'LOST' LATIN AMERICA \n“There is trouble ahead for Uncle Sam in his own backyard. Big trouble…….… there is a wave of profound anti-American feeling stretching from the Texas border to the Antarctic.”\nhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4861320.stm
634646
Well in Latin America, just to be short, basically think about Cuba (the missile crisis) and just to go more generally it affected a lot its politics. For example the birth of guerrillas and the killing of anyone who could lead a Latin-American country to a social or communist State. \nIn the middle of Asia i.e. the extremist Islamic groups gain power and stop communist from taking power\nFor more infos check www.wikipedia.com and just look for cold war.\nHope it helped
550687
I would argue that the Cold War affected Latin America in about the same way it affected the entire 3rd world. Many lower class individuals were easy targets for communist propaganda and likewise any poltical manuevering they attempted was seen by Washington DC as communist revolution. Therefore America would naturally side or back whatever regime wished to supress any popular or socialist/communist power being sought. Any peasant or lower-class miltant movement undermining western/capitolist philosphy was dealt with under very cruel circumstances. There was for instance, and you may look this up on the internet, something called the Guatemallan college of the Americas (http://www.derechos.org/soa/guat-not.html), in which American inteligence officials were brought in to teach proper torture and assination techniques to our "allies" in Latin America in dealing with communist revolts and militant movements. If you consider Cuba part of Latin America then that opens up an entirely new can of worms following the Jan 31st 1959 takeover by Fidel Castro which eventually led to a Socialist government (technically not communist one because the revolution was not declared a communist one until afterwards). As soon as Castro sided with the Soviet Union, America naturally hated him and began a propaganda/embargo against him which has lasted well into the Bush regime. One must remember that the 3rd world (including Latin America), was the battleground for the Cold War. We may not have shot directly at Moscow, but we would shoot at their allies whenever we could. Likewise, we would support anyone they hated. The saying goes, "any enemy of my enemy is my friend", which was why we supported and trained such names as Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden when they were fighting against the Soviets or their "allies". Now the the Soviet Union is gone, many old "friends" have became hated enemies, with few really knowing what has happened.\nAnyway, I hope this helps you out somehow. I am a history teacher so I know a thing or two. Good luck, and hope I gave you enough info.
742365
south america, between chile, bolivia, paraguay, brazil, uruguay and the atlantic ocean.
451604
I will surely go for 1970. The team was on a mission which it accomplished. I recall that the entire forward line was "lethal". From Tostao to Pele and Jarzinho. The 1982 squad even though was the favorite for that year considering it had the likes of the great Zico, Socrates, Junior, Alemao (to mention but a few) had a poor striker in Serginho who ironically performed brilliantly at the club level before the world cup.
392543
Third World is a term first coined in 1952 by French demographer Alfred Sauvy to distinguish nations that aligned themselves with neither the West nor with the Soviet Bloc during the Cold War. Today, however, the term is frequently used to denote nations with a low UN Human Development Index (HDI. In general, Third World countries are not as industrialized or technologically advanced as OECD countries, and therefore in academia, the more politically correct term to use is "developing nation".
441472
According to many people, the Brazil squad of 1970, including Pele, Gerson, Rivelino, Jairzinho, Tostao and Carlos Alberto, are considered to be the greatest team of all time in the world cup. They won the 1970 cup beating Italy in Mexico City, the score was 4-1 on 21.6.70 with 110 000 in attendance.
1042202
Ernesto Guevara  was an Argentine-born physician that became a member of Fidel Castro's paramilitary 26th of July Movement that seized power in Cuba in 1959. He left Cuba in 1965, was captured in Bolivia in a CIA-organized military operation and died at the hands of the Bolivian Army on October 9, 1967.
529426
YOu can search that online, but it did not do much for Latin America. It made more damage than good.
374299
in mexico  1970 when brasil team won the world cup
756271
Central America\n\nIt's Belize, formerly British Honduras
103591
China, Cuba, Venzula,Mozembeque are a few.\n\nA communist country as defined by marx in the communist manefesto has not and will not exsist