Which has shown more support to military combatants The Clinton Administration or the Bush administration?
154996
The Bush administration, of course.
321501
Well, they are both fans of domestic spying and striking countries that pose no threat. The Republicans support the establishment of an American empire, much in the same way the Nazis strove for global domination.Bush is doing everything in his power to extend executive powers. In fact, Sandra Day O'Connor recently said that the U.S. is moving towards  a dictatorship. When a Republican-appointed former Supreme Court justice says something like that, you know we're in trouble!
1110482
Yes they would still be going on........To all the people who hate Bush,but Loved Clinton.....In no way was Bosnia or Somalia a threat to us......yet clinton sent troops to both places,and in Bosnia he sent in troops without UN Support.....I guess to Bush haters....The Lives of Bosnians and Somalians are worth more than Iraqi's.....................
1029742
If you were cognizant of reality, you would realize just how uneducated your question is.\n\nAfter 9/11, the US and a coalition of nations went into Afghanistan because the Taliban government there was hosting and supporting al-Qaeda and Osama.\n\nBush had also said that he was generalizing the war on terror, and supported going after countries (like Iraq) that supported, hosted and supplied terrorists, including al-Qaeda, Hamas, etc.\n\nAdditionally, Saddam had refused to comply with the UN resolutions in destruction of his WMD (see link).\n\nWe were not OK with Iraq under Clinton; Clinton created the US policy of regime change in Iraq. On 12/16/1998, Clinton attacked Iraq with almost 400 stand-off weapons (cruise missiles) and 600 aircraft bombing sorties in response to his failure to comply with UN weapons inspectors.\n\nYour 'knowledge' of recent history is wrong.
930710
Two people- Bush and Blair
992584
You're going to get so many different answers all based on all sorts of different political views...\nBut for me personally, I don't like everything that Bush has done domestically (and no, I'm not talking about the supposed spying program or any of that rabble) but he has been the best during this time of war.\nAs far as Clinton goes...he commited treason. He sold secrets, used presidental order unconstituionaly...but I have nothing actually against the man, just his policies and his actions that he did as president.\nI am a Conservative Federalist...I am for small federal government and for individual state rule. I believe that almost any issue can be handled by the state in accordance to what the people want. So as of right now, I'm frankly mad at all the toe stepping going on in the federal government. This country was founded as a represenative republic and as of right now, this country is moving to the ideology of a democracy. And don't get me started on the activist courts...lol. \nBut as to your question who is better? I would have to say Bush because of my personal feeling on politics and ideology...but others will say otherwise or the same, all for different reasons. I hope you get the reaction you were hoping for.
146351
Clinton was far more articulate. His lies actually made you think 'maybe he telling the truth'. I assume that because he was a lawyer and thats what they do best. Bush has a Business degree. Thats why he always seems to be trying to 'sell' us something.
61378
Yes, the first bush administration are the ones that trained Bin Laden and supplied them with arms. Then The US Government screwed them over.
713175
The Bush Administration hasn't taken responsibility for a damned thing. They blame Clinton for the present and their opposers for the future. Another terrorist attack would see the current president's approval soar. Hell, without 9/11 Bush might have lost the election, hmmm
160102
I feel no loyalty to the Bush Administration.  Yes be afraid, very afriad.  The Chimp is the most dangerous person on the planet, however its his handlers, ( Rove, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Norquist ) that seem to be largely behind things. \n\nI kind of see Bush as something akin to the Emperor Caligula.
152717
Of course, Clinton did it before.\n\nhe went into Yugoslavia without going before the U.N. and members of his own Party claim Bush should have had U.N. backing before going to War yet never criticize Clinton.\n\nNot to mention Clinton didn't even try to get U.N. approval to go to War but Bush did try and told them we were going to War with or without U.N. support.
837148
Many of those on this forum are republicans, which are now the minority party, George bush has never enjoyed the popularity that Clinton did and still does. I didn't vote for Bill only because he dodged the draft and I served, I didn't vote for Bush because he found a differnt way of avoiding the war, but on the ver all, Clinton was a good president. He tried to do every thing he said he was going to do, so no one should have been suprized, he also defeated a sitting president which is rare. So I don't think you can judge the consensious of the American people by this forum,btw\n\nClinton did an excellent job considering the republicans had the majority in both houses for most of his term!\n\nThere was debt although not like the war is creating. And while I dint vote for him I didnt vote republican then either but Libertarian\n\nI gave you a thumbs up but notice how few anti Clinton comments compaired to the thumbs down, the republicans and ne cons do that, they also report views when they conflict as they do not believe in free speech or intellegent debates
304835
Blame George Bush, when Clinton was the president he released the strategic reserves, of couse he and his family wasn't profiting from it.
1071597
Mr Clinton stated that the reason he was sending troops was because Milosevic was committing genocide.  He was right and it was stopped.  Mr. Bush claimed he was sending troops because Saddam had WMD's, was starting a nuclear weapon program, had ties to AL Quada and was involved in 9-11.  All those things were wrong and now thousands of people are dead and the killing continues.  If Mr. Bush would have stated he was sending troops because Saddam was committing genocide, then he would have been right, also.  That's the difference: being right vrs. being wrong.
76894
Definitely Clinton.  During the Clinton years our economy was great (imagine operating with a budget surplus rather than deficit!) and he isn't a warmonger.
595776
Clinton was handed bin laden when he was in office ; but "refused". The Liberals really grasp at anything they can to criticize President Bush , because it's like you say:"They can't win elections".Instead of standing for anything or trying to help the country-they look at the worst in anything, and then they run with that "doom & gloom" football.It's like they can't handle it when nothing is "wrong", because how are they going to convince the population what "loosers" they are with out them ..
731071
That is true!!!! Bush cares more about Americans and protecting us, no matter how hard the liberal media and democrats tries to discredit him!!!