What does an architect really do? Wat r d necessary attitudes 2 bcome 1? Is it more suitable for a man?
145058
An architect usually has a precise eye for detail. A background in art is especially helpful, with strengths in thinking as an engineer, a builder, good people-skills and an interior designer. An architect has to be a great listener when he/she is meeting with a client, to truly hear what they are asking for, and even what they're not actually verbalizing. It is a most fitting career for either gender, and there are all sorts of specializations in the field. \n\nIt is a rewarding career that can pay extremely well or get you by comfortably, in some sort of style. (Architects do have, above all else, STYLE.) You can work in a large firm and enjoy the big-city life or work in your pajamas at home. You can go anywhere with architecture...but you do have to enjoy sitting on your bum quite a lot. The hours are long and the deadlines can be stressful - but almost any job includes that.
1140676
They're both important, but you can change looks. Changing attitude is a pain in the ass.\nSo, personality and attitude... and not in the cliche' way.
1162321
well u definitely need to know physics to be doing architecture... i mean, if u seriously wanna make biuldings n all then how will u manage if u don't know anything abt newton's laws, force, tension, elasticity n what not.... check out this link for more details:\nhttp://learning.indiatimes.com/career/car_options/arch/arch.htm
659770
Mental is a big aspect.  He's gotta be smart enough to respect women and intelligent enough to hold a converation.  Looks, while not a MAJOR priority... I still gotta be attracted to the guy.  What's the point in dating the perfect man if the though of fooling around gives you the creeps?
644863
Generally:\n\nDrawing (by hand)\nComputer modeling/visualizing\nPhysics (statics, structures)\nHistory of Architecture\nStudio/Design Courses\nArchitectural/Building Sciences\nProfessional Practice\n\nThe numbers and types of these courses will vary with the university focus, be it design or technology or science or history. Also, most professional degree granting programs will require a basic college math course (calculus), history course, and english/writing course. \n\nArchitecture schools will give you many of the skills to get a job as an "intern architect" (you do get paid).  What is important to employers is: 1) that you are proficient in CAD; 2) that you can communicate well verbally and in writing; 3) that you understand different materials and how they are assembled in three dimensions.  The better colleges/universities will expose you to all three of these things throughout your college experience.
714745
For architecture schools a lot depends on your grades.  In many schools architecture is the most competitive major.  \n\nBe sure that you go to a school with a 5 year or 4+2 program.  You do not want to be "pre-architecture."  That qualifies you for nothing.  I did a 5 year program at Ball State (good program) but many schools are switching to Masters instead of Bachelors, but honestly, most firms know someone with a 5 year B-Arch is as qualified (sometimes more) then someone with a Masters, so that should not be your guide.  \n\nI agree with the above schools.  But here is my advice on finding a good school.\n\n I'd stay away from "big names."  You need to be taught by real professors in studio classes and not by grad assistants.  Where ever you go look for that.  Also look for a school that leaves the building open 24-7, closing an architecture building at 12 or 1 is a huge pain for students who have to bring drawings and stuff home to finish (all nighters are normal for architure students from year one.)  Look for a school that offers cross displinary minors worked into your cirriculum, so often architecture majors never get to take classes outside their major, pretty depressing.  Look for a school that offers classes on "sustainable" architecture.  \n\nThen get ready to work your butt off.... and have the time of your life...
937941
Experience working with Java architects has taught me...\n\n1) Software architects are required by law to be absolutely horrid programmers.  Practice writing loops that eat up all available memory (because "that's how you do it") and bring down the server, then complain that the server needs more memory.  Delete functioning cross-browser code (because "that's not how you do it") and then make the code so it only works in IE.\n\n2) Software architects are also required to have incredibly inflated egos and to always be experts at everything.  Everyone else is an idiot.  Practice shooting down the opinions of the "lesser" programmers.  Research new ways to reinvent the wheel.  Remember, org.w3c.dom is ok, but you could write wrapper methods around it and make something that only you understand, making yourself invaluable to your employer.  Who needs Struts and Hibernate when you can spend a year developing your own broken framework on the company's dime?\n\nSee my full rant on "architects" at: http://softwareblog.csixty4.com/?p=4
845769
I know you hear people talking about "working" on a marriage or relationships, but its not like putting a wing on a house.  From what you say it sounds like you want him to be more sensitive as you perceive yourself to be.  Men and women are different, why do you want to feminize him?
629762
Show respect!  Ask good questions.  Don't go overboard throwing your knowledge around trying to impress anyone; you'll come across as an arrogant little know-it-all.  That doesn't mean you can't have opinions; just remember that they (probably) all have a similar level of education, and experience on top of that.\n\nThe mechanics of design are, of course, important; but much of the real world revolves around relationships.\n\nOh, and VERY IMPORTANT:  Proofread yourself!  Spelling, grammar and (in your question) punctuation errors make a very bad first impression!
550807
Your question sounds like you REALLY want to get into a man's head on how he thinks...  Refreshing!!\n\nAnyway, I can only answer for myself, so here it goes:\n\nFor me, physical beauty is great, but without having the ability to hold a conversation, I don't have time for her.  Think about it this way, if I am on a date and we decide to get intimate, that is fine.  But what happens after that????  If she cannot stimulate me mentally as well, the relationship will not last.  I need someone who can THINK as well as look good.  \n\nHere are some of the things that make ME happy:  If she wants to give me a deep passionate kiss right out in the open (like outside on the street) just because she wants to (by the way, I have done this myself in my past relationships -- I have had NO COMPLAINTS)....That would be nice!  \n\nThings that make me sad or angry would probably be if she disrespected me in any way.  Personally, I try not to do that, but I am not perfect.  There is a difference between doing something accidentally vs. a deliberate act.  If it is proven to be deliberate -- don't expect me to be around for much longer.  I will not stand for it.  \n\nI would like any woman who I have a relationship with to be a lady in public, but be a WOMAN in private.  \n\nI hope this clarifies somewhat your questions, if you want more information, just e-mail me.
990785
Good base of answers above, and all are pretty much correct.  An architect will determine how a building looks, feels, and functions to the satisfaction of the owner.  A structural engineer will determine what is required to resist the forces of nature (gravity, wind, seismic, etc.) so as to ensure the building can be safely occupied to the satisfaction of the architect.  Notice the chain of command...\n\nArchitects must pass a very intense testing program to become licensed in their state.  Engineers must first pass an FE exam (8 hours) usually after graduation, then get through four years of experience, then pass another 8 hour test to become licensed in their state.\n\nStructural engineering is basically a branch of civil engineering; however, I have found that many civil engineers who end up doing engineering in architecture lack the ability to understand the needs of architecture.  Enter the architectural engineer.  We are trained in the all of the essentials of engineering, but we also take courses in architecture to ensure some understanding of that side of building construction.  We are here to design a building, but lets not forget that the whole point is for it to look good.\n\nI was in the same predicament as you when I graduated high school.  I liked physics and math and buildings.  If you have an interest in buildings and construction and you have a technical background as well, you should consider architectural engineering.  If your technical background is not so strong and you have more creativity, stick with architecture.  Either way, be sure to find an ABET accredited program otherwise, the licensing process becomes much more difficult.
862756
Form and function the eternal dilemma for an architect.\nSome people say form follows function others say function should follow form.\nWell, in my personal point of view, I say function is more important than form. You can have a beautiful room but if it doesn't work, it will be a matter of time until it's not functional and aesthetic. Because you will do the best to turn it into a functional space.\nOn the other hand if you have a building that is completely functional, you might end up with an industrial-looking building, when in fact you wanted a cosy-looking house.\nHowever, whenever I am doing an architectural project, I always try to find a balance between form and function. But if I have to sacrifice something, it will always be form (if I can't really do anything else, or I'm running out of time.)\nA good example to this issue, are the follies in La Villete from Tschumi. This buildings look great, the red colour against the green from the park is great. But they have no function, you can't get inside the building and live space. The follies are there only to be contemplated from the outside. These buildings are quite controversial, as the theory behind them go beyond the function-form dilemma. But it's a good example.\n\nHope I helped.
766223
This is a broad question.\n\nHowever, The Construction Engineer reviews the design of a Building or structure with the Architect and offers suggestions and improvements to the design based on The engineers experience.\n\nA slight change to the Design can save money and time, perhaps.\n\nArchitects and designers constantly have the design reviewed by Construction Engineers for design enhancements..\n\nWith the Computer aided design, the data base can be reviewed world wide and at any time during the Design cycle.\n\nConclusion: The Design is reviewed by many Engineering individuals on line and in face to face meetings.\n\nHopes this assists you.\n\nRegards.
1170890
You question doesn't makes sence are you looking for architecture companies?  I'm confused.
837691
there are many different tastes and styles to choose from- many different likes and dislikes among architects and the companies that pay them for their services.\n\nbuildings are made to last so they must be able to function in the future which is hard to plan because of how technology is rapidly increasing\n\ndifferent styles are used in different parts of the country- example would be that houses in Midwest have basements and houses along the ocean do not- architecture must fit the geographical area
505654
GOD is the master of design, engineering, etc. I see nothing wrong with admiring his work as long as you do not Idiolize. Also, a little bit is good, too much ain't good. DO NOT dwell on anything too long.
370815
Architecture is one of the few subjects that incorporates both the arts and the sciences and as such it's useful to have qualifications in both areas.\n\nThere are no hard and fast rules when applying to universities as they each apply their own set of entry requirements and your choice of art, design and maths would provide you with a good grounding.\n\nWith the advent of computers a lot of the traditional skills of the architect are not so much needed - drawings and designs are created electronically as opposed to sitting at a drawing board for hours on end.\n\nArchitecture also involves a lot of maths and physics.  You have to understand how structures work and be able to determine what will and won't work (and safely).  For example, it might look very nice to have a fancy cantilevered vieweing platform projecting from the side of a building but if it causes the building to collapse then it's not very practical; you'd have to calculate all the forces involved and design your building to accomodate these forces.\n\nThere's an article from The Independent that you may find useful... http://education.independent.co.uk/higher/az_degrees/article26969.ece \n\nGood luck with your A levels and future degree course.