Question on Grammar.....A and B both have $1.0M.   A and B each have $1.0M.   Same meaning??
153953
A and B EACH have $1.0M is correct.
127917
A: 2 PPL HAVE SAME GENDER\nB: 2 PPL HAVE SAME BIRTHDAY\n\n\nP(A) = 90/190\nP(B) = 365/365 X 1/365 = 1/365\n\nP(AnB) = P(A) X P(B) = 90/190 X 1/365 = 0.001
1179373
You ought to be able to "logic" it out.  I think you might be making it more complicated, in your mind, than it really is.\n\n"y" is an unknown number.  2y is double that number.  \n\nThat means that there are two of "y" is 2y, or that "y" can go into 2y twice.
475186
A quantity that is divided by another quantity.
876730
A quarter and a nickel.\n\nONE of them is not a nickel...its a quarter!
885981
I HATE it when they omit the comma.  It makes me confused.  I start to wonder if the last two items are more closely related than the other items.  But every time I try to argue about this to somebody, they tell me to stop being so stuck up about grammar when my own isn't so good.  So I just keep quiet and ignore it.
802753
"Division by Zero in mathematics is undefined because no definite meaning can be attached to this operation. To understand this, notice that a/0=b must (if it means anything) mean the same as a=0•b.\nHowever, if a≠0 then a=0•b is not true for any b; and if a=0 then a=0 is true for every b. This tells us that a/0 cannot be assigned a definite value- and therefore has no meaning."    --George Simmons
584190
Correct.\n\n(1350+99)*1.06
628648
None. The two numbers have no common factors, bar -1. You mean exactly (with no remainder) not evenly.
951234
Grams are mass\nKiloliter is volume.\n\nYou can't convert 1 to the other.
719127
Well you got a quarter and a nickel.  Because one of the coins is not a nickel, it is a quarter.  So the other one is a nickel.  Hehehe.... Good one.
65508
This question is not very well-posed and I believe that is why you have no answers yet. \nfirst, what's with the n(B) = 2.....  ? the dots are leaving out something important.\n\nby AnB i assume you mean the intersection of A and B, not the union AuB. Also, what is the expression A'nB' mean?\n\n-too much time on my hands....
252461
Suppose:\nI lend you one dollar, now you owe me one dollar. \n\nIf you spend the dollar you are holding ( the one I gave you), you have no money, right?\n\nNo.  You have minus 1 dollar.  You still owe me a dollar, so, you can't say "I have 0 money", as it's not true.  You do have money, simply a negative quantity of it.
991856
It is called WRONG. If A is much larger than B, then A+B/A is about A unless you meant (A+B)/A, in which case the result is about 1. In neither case do you get A/B.
943121
Both of the top 2 answers are correct depending on what you meant. If you meant the sum of 5 times EACH of the numbers then the first answer is correct. If you meant the smaller number added to 5 times the larger number then the second answer is correct.
4413
If you think of the "and" operator in grammar as a "plus" in math, then no--both can't exist simultaneously (well, after you poop it out I guess).\n\nAnd since people want to emphasize you not being able to have something more than the action maybe that's why they say the HAVE first.
118612
Kerplode is right - but that's kind of complicated.  Basically you solve both in exactly the same way.  The only difference is that instead of an = you have an > or <.  \n\nIt just looks different, there really is no difference in how you solve them.