do you have to be a killer to prove a point ?
139117
I am curious as to the meaning of your question.  There is a difference between killing and murdering.  A killer is a life taker, be it human or animal or insect or maybe even vegetation.  If you are referring to the intentional taking of a human life then no.  War does not fall into this category.  War is a necessary evil.  It helps maintains those freedoms we hold so dear.
1130621
If someone killed my child brutally, not accidentally... I think I could actually kill.  iIdon't know, I hope not, because it would not do any good... but I think that would be the only thing strong enough to actually incite me to murder.
224834
Yes.\n\nIf you execute a murderer he will NEVER escape.  He will NEVER hurt anyone else.  And it helps the victim's family heal.  The thought that a murderer is still alive grates on the minds and heartsof the families of the victims.  And there is something that is inherently just about executing a murderer, because the victim will NEVER have another birthday, will NEVER have another holiday with their families.\n\nSome crimes are so vile that the only punishment can be death.
389576
If the criminal admits to the crime, then I agree, kill them the same day.  But if they proclaim their innocence, they have a right to appeal. You are either guilty beyond a reasonable doubt or you aren't...so I don't really think you can put a percentage on guilt to be ok with the execution.\n\nOn a side note, I think that capital punishment is a good crime deterent.  If people are desperate, it won't matter, but it will deter some.
155299
NO. BUT DON'T LET ME CONVINCE YOU LOKK AROUND ON THE STREETS AND SEE WHAT WOULD HAPPEN TO YOU. LIVING ON THESTREET, ROBBING YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS FOR MONEY, PROSTIUTING YOURSELF FOR MONEY THE LIST GOES ON AND ON
861525
If you can prove it yes,  but it has to be within the statute time of your state or Government,\n\nThe evidence is what will get you a win,  but you will have to use it as proof to win,  that means produce the evidence say you were wrongfully punished and sue the crap out of that community.
318080
I do believe violence is not the answer and that it should be a last resort. But the non-violent approach can be as bad as the violence way. Like lawyers they twist and manipulate words and facts, the media and the countries all do the same. In this case, it is screwing everyone over. Like that evidence is not admissible crap. We have a tape showing him murder this person, but we didn't legally obtain it, so not admissible. Total crap, its evidence one way or another. So non-violence can be as bad as violence in that nothing is ever totally fair for humanity. So is killing the person for killing someone else or letting the killer off because of some technicality worse, violence vs. non-violence?
105400
Absolutely, however there are much easier ways to go about killing someone. If you have you heart set on it though, go ahead.
188454
Actually, it's either yes or no.\nSerial killers may kill in one of these reasons:\nMoney,\nRevenge,\nMentalness,\nTerroism\nGetting Dared (which is very like IMPOSSIBLE)\nAccidental\nSuicidal Terroism\nSome serial killers may be the nicest, caring people in the world, but might need revenge. For example, say that you have a mean enemy, and one day killed your pets. (This is not a clear example, sorry) And you would like revenge. But, some serial killers are. In an experiment, scientists found out that 58% of the serial killers kill people because of mental illness, such as hearing voices, or hallucinations. \nI hope this helps you.
619873
I say yes.\n\nIf they're making the conscious CHOICE to enter your home, then you have the obvious reciprocal choice to make them pay for theirs.\n\nIf they're committing a crime in the first place, especially such a personal one...shouldn't they be punished for being such an obvious dumb@$$?\n\nNow, generally, I won't shoot to kill...but I'll be damned if I won't shoot to maim someone breaking into my home.
661276
While murder in America is illegal, suicide fits that bill. If you believe you are one or a hundred, pull the trigger! They can only give you the chair once right!\n But in all honesty, buy the gun and shells yourself, put that together and then in your mouth and pull the trigger! Save from the world your problem.\n\nI have attempted to phrase this in a manner I thought you would understand.
531467
Good point, if instruction were the only reason for punishing someone.  However, there is also deterrent value ("Don't you other people kill someone or you might end up dead yourself like this guy"), and prevention value ("Well, he won't be killing no-one no more, what with being dead and all").\n\nI think what you are touching on is the age old dilemna between 'an eye for an eye' vs 'turn the other cheek'.\n\nAddition: Can I just add to Apollo (below), thanks for the advice in thinking before I type.  I wonder how long you thought before deciding that killing someone will not prevent them from commiting more crimes?  That's what prevention value means.  Also, when you assert that it's been proven that executing murderers does not act as a deterrent, I think that's the sort of thing the 'source' field is for.  Sorry I seem to have upset you, but there's really no need to insult me in return.  By the way, I didn't mention in my response whether I am in favour of execution or not - please refrain from presuming you know the answer.
256689
Don't invite trouble. You never know who is on the net, a killer or friend.\n\nAfriend is less likely so be careful.
636799
Are you keeping score?  Too many people have been killed by too many other people for so long, that you can't get an accurate count.  If the killers stopped killing, then no one would need to count anything except our blessings.
942264
Sure, why not.  You don't have to be on the side of right or justice to be competent.\nRommel was implicated in the plot to assassinate Hitler, and was forced (allowed) to commit suicide.
222638
It's illegal right now & I think I have it in me to commit a murder at times. If it were legal, I KNOW I would get even with a few people (supposed 'best-friends' who stabbed in the back being high on that list)...\n\nWish I had a sniper. The world would be a better place... for me :D
402518
If you fear for your life or your family's..nothing will happen. You have a right to defend yourself. But be smart.\n\nIf you cant prove fear of life then brandishing a firearm is one of several things you may be charged with if you point a firearm. There are other charges you'll be slapped with also. \nI suggest ANYONE who has or is thinking of obtaining a firearm read this book..it only costs a couple buck and is a real eye opener. Very plain language without all that "legalese". This one is a california edition, laws in your state may vary.\nhttp://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0964286483/qid=1145804767/sr=2-3/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_3/002-1006831-6660060?s=books&v=glance&n=283155