What is Hon Barrister John Miller?
141018
It is a form of the "nigerian bank scam" and they are just trying to get information from you so the can steal money from you.  I get dozens of these emails per month.\n\nI would forward to email to the abuse department of the internet provider where the email originated.  Beyond that, there really isn't much else you can do besides ignore it.
795196
The name John Doe has long been used by British courts to represent an unidentified party in a court case.
128498
Most countries operate with one kind of 'lawyer'. The English legal system operates with two ñ the barrister and the solicitor - together they make up the legal profession. The traditional view is that we have one legal profession with two branches but in practice they operate separately with their different traditions, training organisations etc. We can view the situation as a profession where the division of labour principle operates. Both carry out their separate roles with a view to administering the law. \n\nAlthough Barristers and Solicitors are seen as members of one profession their training, traditions and governing bodies are entirely dissimilar to each other.  No doubt if you were to confuse the two professions while in the presence of a Barrister or Solicitor you would be quickly and clearly informed of your mistake, for their tradition and values as professionals of the English legal system leads to a prowess not often seen in what some might call a job, but what many would call their duty.
752997
SarahLiz is correct. Short version.\n\nBarristers appear before the court. Solicitors give legal advice.\nLawyers and attorneys (at law) do both. \n\nMost jurisdictions have just lawyers/attorneys. Some split and have separate licenses for barristers (litigators) and solicitors.\n\nOther than that, the terms are often swapped around. See above.
654301
John Parrott\nhttp://search.bbc.co.uk/cgi-bin/search/results.pl?scope=all&edition=i&q=1991+snooker+champion
57443
John Roberts\n\nBio:\nJohn Glover Roberts, Jr. (born January 27, 1955) is the seventeenth and current Chief Justice of the United States. Roberts previously was a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, spent 14 years in private law practice and held positions in Republican administrations in the U.S. Department of Justice and Office of the White House Counsel.
382226
Facts of the Case\n\nThompson was Sergeant-At-Arms for the House of Representatives. Hallett Kilbourn was subpoenaed to testify before and deliver documents to a Special Committee established by the House of Representatives to investigate the bankruptcy of J. Cook and Company. He appeared but refused to answer questions and did not deliver the documents. After a report back to the full House, Sergeant-At-Arms, John G. Thompson, was ordered to take Mr. Kilbourn into custody. When the Sergeant-At-Arms brought Mr. Kilbourn before the House to be questioned by the Speaker of the House, he again refused to answer questions or produce the documents. He also refused to offer an explanation of his refusal. The House resolved that Kilbourn was in contempt and should be held in custody until he agrees to testify and produce the requested documents. \n\n \n\n \n\nQuestion Presented\n\nDoes the House of Representatives have the right to compel testimony?\n\n \n\nConclusion\n\nRarely. “...there is in some cases a power in each House of Congress to punish for contempt.” That power is qualified in the next paragraph, “The cases in which they can do this are very limited,” and they added, “...we cannot give our assent to the principle that, by the mere act of asserting a person to be guilty of a contempt, they thereby establish their right to fine and imprison him, beyond the power of any court or any other tribunal whatever to inquire into the grounds on which the order was made..”\n\n \n\nThe Court also reaffirmed the rights of Legislators to speech and debate protection from arrest while Congress was in session.
596851
John Howard offcourse
172507
Minister Louis Farrakhan.\n\nLM
914166
Celebrity Attorney\nSurgeon (plastic, specifically in Beverley Hills)
218110
John Howard is the prime minister.
790851
They are lawyers who have been elected to be judges. I'm pretty sure that they are DA's before judges. Good luck.
873127
earl  anthony hons and the highest paid too hons--
686820
In the British judicial system, there are barristers (trial lawyers, who practice at "the bar", or within a courtroom) and solicitors, who do not do trial work, but give legal advice, prepare documents and forms, etc. In the US and Canada, there are only lawyers, who may do both or only one.
814833
Chief Justice John Roberts of the US.\n\nThe Supreme Court is highest court in the United States.  The Chief Justice presides over the Impeachment Cases conducted by the Senate.
240155
Percy Robert Miller (born April 29, 1967), better known as Master P, is a rap artist and CEO and founder of No Limit Records.
403178
Queen's Counsel (postnominal QC), during the reign of a male sovereign known as King's Counsel (KC), are, in England, Wales and Northern Ireland barristers, or in Scotland advocates, appointed by letters patent to be one of "Her Majesty's Counsel learned in the law". They do not constitute a separate order or degree of lawyers. They are, however, more than merely a professional rank, as their status is conferred by the Crown and recognised by the courts. In order to join the Counsel you have to serve as a barrister for at least 15 years.\n\nQueen's Counsel have the privilege of sitting within the Bar of court, and wear silk gowns of a special design (hence the informal title Silks). \n\nHistory: England\nThe Attorney-General, Solicitor-General, and King's Sergeants were King's Counsel in Ordinary in the Kingdom of England. The first Queen's Counsel "Extraordinary" was Sir Francis Bacon, who was given a patent giving him precedence at the Bar in 1597, and formally styled King's Counsel in 1603 (W. S. Holdsworth, History of English Law (1938) vi 473-4; Patent Rolls, 2 Jac I p 12 m 15).\n\nThe obsolete rank of Serjeant-at-Law was formerly more senior, though it was overtaken formally in the 1670s, and professionally in the course of the late eighteenth century by the newer rank. The Attorney-General and Solicitor-General, had similarly succeeded the King's Serjeants as leaders of the Bar in Tudor times, though not technically senior until 1623 (except for the two senior King's Serjeants) and 1813 respectively (JH Baker, "The English Legal Profession 1450-1550" in Wilfred Prest (ed), Lawyers in Early Modern Europe and America (1981), 20). But the Queen's Counsel only emerged into eminence and integrity in the early 1830s, prior to when they were relatively few in number. It became the standard means of recognising that a barrister was a senior member of the profession, and the numbers multiplied accordingly (Daniel Duman, The English and Colonial Bars in the Nineteenth Century (1983) 35.) It became of greater professional importance to become a QC, and the serjeants gradually declined. The QCs inherited not merely the prestige of the serjeants, but enjoyed priority before the courts.\n\nQueen's Counsel and serjeants were prohibited, at least from the mid-nineteenth century, from doing chamber work. They were briefed together with a junior barrister, and they had to have chambers in London (Duman 98-99). Till 1920 in England and Wales they had to have a licence to appear in criminal cases for the defence. On appointment, QCs renounced the preparation of written pleadings and other chamber practices.\n\nQueen's Counsel were traditionally selected from barristers, rather than from lawyers in general. This was because they were counsel appointed to conduct court work on behalf of the Crown. Although the limitations on private employment were gradually relaxed, they continued to be selected from barristers, who had the sole right of audience to the higher courts. However, in 1994 solicitors of England and Wales were entitled to be admitted to the upper courts. Some 275 were so practising in 1995. In 1995 these solicitors alone became entitled to apply for appointment as Queen's Counsel. The first such was appointed March 1997 (On 27 March 1997, of the 68 new QCs announced, two were solicitors. These were Arthur Marriott (53), partner of the London office of the American law firm of Wilmer Cutler and Pickering, and Dr Lawrence Collins (55), a partner of the City law firm of Herbert Smith who was subsequently appointed as a High Court Judge.\n\nThe first women to be appointed as King's Counsel were Helen Normanton and Rose Heilbron in 1949.\n\nThe appointment of further Queen's Counsel was suspended in 2003 and it was widely expected that the system would be abolished, although existing QCs were not affected by the suspension. However, a vigorou