Are there any good references to creationism apart from www.creationism.org?
138039
hi rainlover \n\ngo to http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/wic.html \n\nit's a great site ;)\n\n\nhey i read your profile and it says you love rain...\n\ni have friend who loves rain.\n\nshe will never stop talking about him
1044829
http://www.emjc3.com/helland.htm\nhttp://www.getsaved.com/\nhttp://www.carm.org/doctrine/100truths.htm
977079
huh, yeah im not a creationist either, but i dont think that you can fully understand the stuff without an in depth study of scientific material. \n\nthere is a book called darwins black box by michael behe.  he doesnt call himself a creationist, hes a biochemist that after looking at plenty of evidence has alot of questions and decided to write a book. it basically is challenging evolution. \n\nfrom what i understand the missing links (transitional species) are not there in the fossil record.  thats why you have guys that come up with the punct eq theory, etc.  there are some that say they have found a couple missing links here and there, but it doesnt explain the massive amount of life that supposedly changes from one thing to another. \n\nanother guy is sennapathy (sp.), he is a south asia indian guy that has the same questions and different conclusions.  hes a genetic scientist.\n\ngranted there are examples of mutations, like in viruses and the like, that one could point to, but the data for large scale biology is still sketchy
770151
OMG, thanks for that link... those pictures are just amazing!\n\nI already accept evolution, though :)
812832
Here are a few good Christian websites:\n\nMonergism Theology Site \nwww.monergism.com\nThis website has a great wealth of information on various subjects of the Bible, giving many resources from both Christians who are here on this earth today, and those from our past. \n\nDesiring God Ministries\nwww.desiringgod.org\nIf you are looking for a sermon on a particular subject or passage, check out Desiring God the ministry of John Piper. This website contains a great wealth of information from Piper's years of pastoring and writing. Most of his books are online for you to read for free as well as countless audio messages.\n\nGrace to You\nwww.gty.org\nThe Ministry of John MacArthur. John MacArthur is a pastor who is commited to chapter by chapter verse by verse teaching of God's word. Excellent website.\n\nAlbert Mohler's Blog\nwww.albertmohler.com\nAlbert Mohler is the president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Kentucky. Albert Mohler is one of the leading evangelical voices in the nation and offers great commentary on recent events. For intelligent Christian discussion this radio program is definitely worth every second!\n\nAlpha and Omega Ministries\nwww.aomin.org\nInterested in some good theological debates between Christians and Non-Christians? James White offers debates on video and audio at a reasonable price, along with a wealth of other information worthy to be checked out. Great apologetic website.\n\nChristian Apologetics and Research Ministry\nwww.carm.org\nAnother great website is CARM headed by Matthew Slick. CARM is a ministry that deals with defending the Christian faith and providing answers to those who are oft in opposition of it. Great section on cults and world religions. \n\nReligion News Blog\nwww.religionnewsblog.com\nInterested in religious news? This website collects religious news feed worldwide. Excellent website to find out the most recent information concerning the religions you are most interested in hearing about.\n\nThese are just a few excellent websites with material that will keep you busy for hours, days, months, and years to come!
935770
ewtn.com;pureloveclub.net{look under research};;;AND\nhttp://jerrysmith29.tripod.com/catholicteens/
75898
I found a bunch of stuff for you: creationist, Big Band, myths all around the world... enjoy and good luck!
861407
wikipedia.org is another good site as well. ^^
853231
http://www.natural-law.org/index.html
679573
Creationism is dead...if it was ever alive to begin with.\nIt was conjured up in Seattle think tank by Brainiac spilling coffee on floor.\nCan't wait for the next publicity stunt in the religious arena.\noh yeah....I forgot about the Da Vinci Code.\nremember...its fiction.
396923
Creationism is based in religion, but there is scientific backing..  The scientific evidence for it is called Intelligent Design and offers a great deal of evidence for a creator.  "Darwin's Black Box" by Michael Behe give a great scientific refutation of macro-evolution (species into species evolution).  If science is the search for truth then all avenues must be explored.  I'm a creationist and a scientist, the best science I've seen supports a creator.  Darwinian and Neo-Darwinian evolution have major flaws and gaps, how did the information in living beings come about.  When we see an ordered room, machine, book, etc. we know an intelligent agent was at work.  Same in nature.  If evolution didn't create things, then there was a creator.  As Sir Arthur Conan Doyle said, "When you eliminate the impossible, whatever is left, however improbable, must be true."
1107217
Creationists are people who take the bible literally and believe that God created the world in seven days.  They believe that this idea should be taught in schools, and in some schools in America this idea is taught as a fact, with evolution being presented as another 'idea' that should not be given much attention.\n\nCreationists use biblical explanations to explain things that happened over millenia - for eg. they say that the reason rock is laid down in strata is not because those strata were laid down over millions of years, recording the earths atmosphere and climate, but because of Noah's flood.\n\nThe ideas come from the bible and from people who take it literally rather than allegorically.
204965
Here's a ton I found earlier, quite randomly: \nhttp://www.adherents.com/largecom/fam_christian.html\n\nIt's ironic you ask! :)
669415
>>>>Is Creationism really science?\n\nNo. Science requires that a theory be potentially able to be proved wrong by readily collected data. Nobody can provide a list of observations that would falsify creationism. Therefore creationism fails the basic test for being science.\n\n>>>> Is it totally based upon relegious beliefs from the >>>> Bible....\n\nNo, it is mostly based on tradition and superstition. The majority of people who base their religious beliefs on the Bible are not Young Earth Creationists.\n\n>>>>>what is the basis of Evolution?\n\nObservational evidence and repeatable experiments. Over a hundred years of observational evidence and repeatable experiments.\n\n\n>>>Does it have a basis beyond observation?\n\nNot really, unless you want to consider the observation of experimental results "Beyond observation". All science is based on observation of evidence.\n\n>>>> By definition can science, or scientific investigation,\n>>>> include observations beyond the five senses?\n\nOf course it can. Science routinely investigates things like  ultraviolet light or the population dynamics of bacteria or the interactions of subatomic particles. None of those things can be observed with any of the five senses.\n\nScience has no problem with accepting observations beyond the five senses.\n\nThe only requirement is that either the observations be replicable or the conclusions be falsifiable. If disinterested observes can repeat your observations you can use the observations of a Native American spirit guide and still be engaged in top level science.
1005150
Well said.\n\nCordially,\nJohn\nhttp://www.GodSci.org
457955
I think -- I hope -- that since last December when the Dover decision was rendered, more people have become aware of the fact that there's no difference between classic creationism and "intelligent design."  And that they are, as you say, total BS.\n\nIt's a pity this lesson now has to be paid for by the taxpayers of the Dover school district.
524209
http://www.wikipedia.org