Federer or Roddick or Agassi?
139697
At this stage, Roddick is not in the running. He has a big serve and a big forehand, but has few big wins to his credit. He does not volley well, he positions himself way to o far behind the baseline, and his backhand is just okay. His volleys are mediocre and he lacks the court coverage of Federer and Agassi.\nAgassi has one of the best returns, as good of groundstrokes as anyone, and a very effective serve when backed up by his groundstrokes. His volleys are okay, but he doesn't use them often, and he doesn't have as versatile a game as Federer.\nFederer has the strongest groundstrokes, equally adept at topspin and slice, a serve that he can hit with an awesome variety of pace and spin, superb volleys, fabulous balance and foot speed, and a creative tennis mind.\nFederer is significantly better than Roddick, and certainly better than Agassi is today. In both of their primes, it would be close, but Federer would clearly have the edge. Federer is simply the best tennis talent ever.
426535
I think Nadal has a decent chance to repeat, however there are many good competitors on this surface. I would'nt dismiss the possibility of Federer capturing this title, but he reminds me too much of Sampras, somewhat impatient for an outstanding clay court player. Look out for Nalbaldian, Gaudio, Coria and Davydenko!
164664
I think it is a tie between Federer and Agasi.
825311
Definitely Wimbledon.\n\nThere is so much history with the sport and if you ask any professional tennis player the one tournament they would like to win, they would pick Wimbledon
403337
For now, I would say Sampras because he did it for longer.  They both can play various styles but within that variety,  I'd say Sampras was more of a classic power player and Federer the more "artistic", touch player.\n\nWhen it's all said and done, and if Federer has a few more dominant years, I think that most people will answer your question with "Federer".  I'm definitely pulling for him to break Sampras' record for most majors won in a career.
702373
federer. even in pete's prime.
671588
Quite possibly.\n\nRight now, i think Nadal is better than Federer on clay however. Nadal has a few years in hand over Federer to round out the rest of his game.\n\nOnly thing that stands in Nadal's way in my opinion is his emotions. Sometimes he lets them get the best of him at the most inopportune times.
774194
I don't think McEnroe or Borg would live with Federer or the other very top players - the game has changed.\nHowever you can only beat what you are up against on the day, so McEnroe, Connors, Borg, Laver, Rosewall etc were all great for their time as was Fred Perry - where's the next Great Brit coming from - Andy Murray?
676002
The one and only Swiss tennis star ROGER FEDERER!!!!!!!!!!!
22690
I like Andre.  But Federer is the most complete player I've seen, and I've been watching tennis for 20 years.
332442
Federer,Nadal,Tipsarevic,.....
328873
I think Andy Roddick will win another major title. I realize there are alot of strong players in the game today and winning a major is extremely difficult. I think Andy will proabably reach three more grandslam finals during his prime years, and I think he will win two of them. Andy would probably already have three grandslam title to his credit, but he was born at the same time as Roger Federer and that guy is simply unbelievable. Roddick is a tremondous talent, and I enjoyed watching him perform well for the US in Davis Cup.
883635
On Personal Preference:\n\n1 Federer - predictable but groundbreaking, and a nicer person than most #1s\n\n2 Nadal - partly for being able to pose a Big Problem for Federer, and partly for instinctively getting how and how not to act to be great for the sport\n\n3 Nalbandian - another Federer question, plus he tends to be a level or two better at bigger events\n\n4 Davydenko - for apparently being injury-proof; he may play more tournaments in a row than some others will all year\n\n5 Blake - great story, very nice person, just needs not to go walkabout in deciding sets\n\n6 Roddick - the swagger leaves me cold, though I can appreciate why others might like it.\n\n7 Robredo - has his moments; a bit of a dark horse\n\n8 Ljubicic - a little like the pre-major-winning Lendl; maybe a bit of a whiner?\n\n1 Dementieva - must have enormous internal fortitude to get such results with such a non-asset of a serve and gets huge points for her social sensitivity in her US Open finals appearance\n\n2 Mauresmo - probably the gentlest soul among all the top players, and has really paid her dues in many respects to deserve her success\n\n3 Henin-Hardenne - glorious game, incredible competitive fire; loses points for questionable sportsmanship and too-blatant selfishness\n\n4 Clijsters - the opposite side of the JHH coin; capable of a much better resume and refreshingly open about valuing friends over trophies, but a little too content with one major title\n\n5 Kuznetsova - for making Martina Navratilova look like a genius\n\n6 Sharapova - love the intensity, maybe too marketable, MAJOR mandatory deduction for the pornographic grunting\n\n7 Hingis - great thoughtfulness on court, but lost a lot of points for making derogatory remarks about Mauresmo years ago (as well as getting into verbal fights with Richard Williams) and doesn't seem to have grown much; dating her doesn't seem to have done much good for Magnus Norman or Sergio Garcia\n\n8 Petrova - probably capable of improving, but fell at the first big hurdle
383331
Ginepri is playing well and Sampras has not played a match in a long time. However don't ever underestimate the abilities of Sampras. I mean he has won 14 grand slams. Come on. It could be a good match if Sampras is in shape, otherwise Ginepri is able to win.
1072173
tough to call.. agassi has the experience.. nadal is 16 years younger.. \n\nthey said agassi was limpin' around after his last match.. i'm gonna have to go with nadal simply because of the youth factor
215960
i totally agree with u roddick is only good becuase of his serve..if it wasnt for his serve he wouldnt survie playing from the base line...so blake is a better player he knows when to switch gears and ask for roddick cocky mofo he only has one and tats his serve...
548645
Theres no doubt that Nadal is a great player, however, he only truly shines when playing on clay.  Federer on the other hand, has mastered all surfaces and has become a legend when compared to Nadal.  BUT, at the Roland Garros, since it IS a clay tournament, Nadal definitely may have an upper hand, as he has shown in the past when playing Federer.  It is a tough prediction, and, considering Nadal has had a lot of down time from being injured, I think that Federer might be able to pull out the next French.