how did george bush win the 2004 election?
145589
The big issue in 2004 was greed. Neocons voted the pocket book over the common good of our Country. They did not seem to care that Bu$h was incompetent or that he was a draft dodger, as long as the cash followed.\n  The Florida Fraud was in 2000 not 2004. In 2004, Bu$h lost in Ohio, there were 247,672 votes thrown out by operatives. The Bu$h margin (certified) was only 136,483 votes. Had all the votes been counted Kerry could have won Ohio. It is also true that many did not vote. In Ohio there were long lines and not enough voting machines in the poor districts. As to the popular vote Bu$h only won it by 2.5 percent, the lowest margin since Woodrow Wilson's 1916 margin of 3.2 percent. Also check out “Diebold”, they are owned by Neocons. The Diebold President even said “I will deliver Ohio to Bu$h”.
514865
Average Americans.  After watching George Bush and his cronies steal the 2000 election and listening to his obvious lies and distortions to get us into this miserable war, they went ahead and re-elected him in 2004.  No wonder the rest of the world has lost respect for and questions the motives of the United States of America.
1106538
It is Diebold. And Bush's cousin is not the owner. You were hoping that Americans were dumb enough to believe false urban legends you spread.\n\nSmart Americans also know that the Diebold machines were a small portion of the voting machines and devices used during either of the elections Bush was in, and were not able to swing an election.
836616
Hmmm,  maybe this will clarify matters. After the 2004 election a bunch of Republicans started getting 'uppity,' they  defied Bush denouncing him as a lame-duck President out of touch with the Republican Party.  Bush butted heads with many of them and proclaimed a 'stay the course' policy loudly yelping that Rumsfield would stay on to the end of Bush's second term.  'Angry' voters turned against the Republicans, many of them the very same ones who had challenged Bush's power.  The 'Democrats' seized power.  But here is the amusing part.  The Democrats are not unified, many have their eyes on winning the Presidency in 2008, which truly scrambles ones loyalty.  Guess who these leaderless Democrats will have to turn to?   Yep, Geo W......    I loathe the smarmy rat and his evil puppet master Karl Rove but they are true political geniuses.  And do note, Rumsfield left on schedule, After the Election, after his presence scuttled several Republican's chances to win.   And who was one of the winners, newly independent Bush buddy Joe Lieberman....\n Bush scored big on November 7th and slowly it will dawn on political pundits.   (Actually Dan Rather has already figured it out )\n\nPeace...
462145
George 'Whatever' Bush will wins, definitely. \nI'm positive about this one. Really!
543930
Bush was reelected...he's the first president to loose the popular vote in his first term and then be re-elected
926917
well, after they finally allowed the overseas military absantee ballots to be counted (that kerry's team tried to keep from happening because they arrived a day late or something similar), it wasn't even close.  Bush won by a large scale.  I don't know the actual numbers.
478060
it was a fixed election    \n \ni live in ohio and oh there was some real politicin here.. a county with a little less than 5000 people lived there and were registered voter.  over 5700 people voted for bush ...? im a little confused  and they said it was a glitch in the automatic voting system
779921
Yes, absolutely. I saw one report that the world didn't blame the Americans for anything done by Bush in his first term because they dildn't know what he was about. But when they reelected him, knowing what he was about, they became complicit in his policies. So yes by the majority voting for Bush in 2004, you could say the American people are partly to blame for the debacle in Iraq.
139222
YES. Bush became president. If he can do it, anyone can.
366325
they rigged the vote. And then, we almost caught them, and he almost still lost, but then they rigged the process by having the supreme court decide instead of the people.\nActually Bush Lost to Al Gore by a wide margin.\n# http://www.votescam.com/\n# http://www.carpenoctem.tv/cons/voting.html\n# http://www.jfkmontreal.com/bush_votescam.htm\n# http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=1060\n# http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=182&row=2\n# http://www.votefraud.org/\n# http://www.garlicandgrass.org/issue8/Diane_Perlman.cfm\n# http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/KEE412A.html\n# http://revspork.blogs.com/revspork/2004/10/more_fun_with_e.html\n# http://www.oilempire.us/stolenelection2004.html\n# http://www.blackboxvoting.org/\n# http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/04votefraud.html\n# http://voteraction.org/
505480
Not everyone voted for Bush. A little over half our country was stupid enough to vote for him. Also, there were many voting irregularities that occurred in Ohio and Florida.  He is probably the most inarticulate and moronic President in American history. It is not brains you need to be president. You need to come from a powerful wealthy family, and have a father who also served as President...and high power friends who own huge corporations.
94498
George Bush would win. Go Texas!
901739
Winning a major election
407051
George W. Bush became president in 2000, and was reelected in 2004.\n\nHis father George Herbert Walker Bush became president in 1988.
870172
They won the election for the Democrats just as they won the election for Bush in '04.  In the next election candidates will need to cater to them.
144926
UGH BUSH! DO YOU EVEN HAVE TO ASK? GOD, I CANT STAND HIM! HOW DID HE GET ELECTED AGAIN!??