What is the temprature of the Universe?
140132
The temperature of space in the Universe is about -454 degrees Fahrenheit, about 2.728 degrees above absolute zero. This temperature is what's left of the temperature generated when the Big Bang occurred (greater than 1.8^13 degrees Fahrenheit)
284973
-213.8 °F (brrrr).\n\nTemperature is proportional to the kinetic energy of air molecules in motion. At absolute 0, there would be no molecular motion, which is -459.67 °F. Thus 32 °F is 491.67 °F above absoltue zero.  If the molecules have half the energy as that, I suppose it could be considered twice as cold (half as warm = twice as cold?). 491.67/2 = 245.8 °F above absolute 0 and below 32 °F. So 32 - 245.8 = -213.8 :)\n\nUsing the absolute (Kelvin) temperature scale simplifies this calculation because absolute 0 is 0 K.
203147
Uranus surface temp is probably 99.6 degrees.  It's normally a little warmer than an under the tongue reading.
1137612
Empty space itself cannot have a temperature, unless you mean some\nabstruse question about quantum vacuums.\n\nHowever, if you put a physical object into space, it will reach a\ntemperature that depends on how efficiently it absorbs and emits\nradiation and on what heating sources are nearby.  For example, an\nobject that both absorbs and emits perfectly, put at the Earth's\ndistance from the Sun, will reach a temperature of about 280 K or 7 C.\nIf it is shielded from the Sun but exposed to interplanetary and\ninterstellar radiation, it reaches about 5 K.  If it were far from all\nstars and galaxies, it would come into equilibrium with the microwave\nbackground at about 2.7 K.\n\nSpacecraft (and spacewalking astronauts) often run a bit hotter than\n280 K because they generate internal energy.  Arranging for them to\nrun at the desired temperature is an important aspect of design.\n\nSome people also consider the "temperature" of high energy particles\nlike the solar wind or cosmic rays or the outer parts of the Earth's\natmosphere.  These particles are not in thermal equilibrium, so it's\nnot correct to speak of a single temperature for them, but their\nenergies correspond to temperatures of thousands of kelvins or higher.\nGenerally speaking, these particles are too tenuous to affect the\ntemperature of macroscopic objects.  There simply aren't enough\nparticles around to transfer much energy.  (It's the same on the\nground.  There are cosmic rays going through your body all the time,\nbut there aren't enough to keep you warm if the air is cold.  The air\nat the Earth's surface is dense enough to transfer plenty of heat to\nor from your body.)
1035039
204.44444444444446 degrees celsius\n\nhttp://www.wbuf.noaa.gov/tempfc.htm\nFarenheit to celsuis converter ^
1157491
Temperature is the physical property of a system that underlies the common notions of "hot" and "cold"; something that is hotter has the greater temperature. Temperature arises from the random microscopic motions of the atomic and subatomic constituents of matter. The temperature is related to the average energy of these microscopic motions. It is a fundamental parameter in thermodynamics.\n\nTemperature is measured with thermometers that may be calibrated to a variety of temperature scales. Throughout the world (except for the U.S.), the Celsius scale is universally used for most temperature measuring purposes.
324188
It is refering to the end of the universe.  Matter will keep expanding endlessly.  Eventually, everything will burn out.  There will be nothing to collide with for heat.  The universe will be black and cold.  This will result in the "Big freeze".
123
You might not have intended it, but your question is a lot more complex than you might have thought.  It turns out that the temperature of the sun is a function of how deep into the sun you are, with the surface temperature being about 6000 Kelvins.  To make things even more complicated, the Corona of the sun (which extends in all directions around the sun beyond the surface) is actually 1,000,000 Kelvins.\n\nThis fact is well established, but further research is required to understand *why* there is such a huge difference in temperature between the two.\n\nNow for the second part of your question:\n\nThe light intensity of the sun drops off as the inverse square of your distance from the sun.  The "heat" is another thing entirely, because heat is defined as the average kinetic energy of particles, and photons don't count strictly in that definition.\n\nThere are particles that come from the sun in the form of solar wind, and around the region of the Earth, they have a "temperature" around 1000k.
769934
It's the actual temperature with humidity, wind chill factor (if applicable), dew point and other conditions taken into consideration. There's actually a mathematical equation to figure it out but it may be hard to find since the calculations are done by computers these days.
71707
Temoperature wise, Absolute zero is 0 degree Kelvin, which is -273 degree Centigrade.  How high is up is relative to what you are asking.  If it is 1 degree Kelvin it is "up" from absolute zero, but it is still damned cold.
144701
by defn:\ntemperature is the degree of hotness or coldness of a body whereas heat is the energy in transit.
596270
45.987F if u don't believe me - take a thermometer and go around the world
166184
The frequency can be converted to energy, which has an equivalent temperature. Your question is rife with confusion. I attached a reference about the Big Bang that might clear some of it up.\n\nHere is the way to get the temperature of a wave of frequency f:\n\nE=hf\n\nwhere E is energy and h is Planck's constant. Also, for each degree of freedom, \n\nE=kT/2\n\nso for the photon with 2 degrees of freedom (2 spins), \n\nE=kT\n\nwhere k is Boltzmann's constant (the universal gas constant divided by Avogadro's number), and T is temperature.\n\nso T=E/k=hf/k \n\n(see references)
652610
36.5°C or 97.7 F is the normal human body temperature. temperatures equal and higher than 37.5°C or 99.5 F means that there is sth wrong with you.
274160
32 degrees F\nor \n0 degrees C
604439
Minus 127 Fahrenheit in Antarctica.
190829
People don't agree on this, but I say 70 degrees farenheit.  I leave it to you to do the math if you prefer celsius.