what's the difference between feedback and efficiency?
109516
I'm only answering this question so the person above can get credit for their answer.\n:)
663002
Whats to think?\nHope is better!!!
1004113
The two terms are often used interchangeably, but the difference is, in simple terms:\n\nQuality control is the process of measuring the quality of the product... checking it to make sure its up to standards,\nQuailty assurance is developing and putting in place, methods of keeping the level of quality up...  designing the manufacturing process to maintain standards, for example.\n\nSo, assurance is preventative...  control is measurement
1176327
I think constructive criticism is the better way to go because you brought attention to something as well as a way to resolve the situation. Remember, if you aren't part of the solution you are part of the problem!!
415756
To improve efficiency\nHigher efficiency results in more product or service with less labor leading to increased revenue
208832
work more efficiently...
263288
I've not known there to be any significant difference other than simple vernacular.\n\nOne may say.....'we must maintain production for the shift to within one percentage point of the current value'.\n\nYou could equally say; 'we need to maintain production to within one percent of the current value'.\n\nSee.....not really a whole lot of difference.\n\nAltho, using "percentage points" in lieu of "percent" is not adding information to a statement. So you'd be better off dropping the fancy phrasing and just using "percent" by itself.\n\nAs you can see....you yourself are confused by this terminology, and if anything causes more questioning and chance for misunderstandings than just using the term as intended.
337981
The workload is similar, but it make or may not be effective for you it kind of depends on what way you learn best.  I have had classes both ways and found I learned more from the ones where I had to go to class.
28482
I wonder the same thing.  One difference is that it is very hard to follow the thread in "Yahoo! Answers".  The question asker can edit their question; a responder can edit their response.  (Actually, if you want to respond to an updated question, it appears that you HAVE to edit your original response...)\n\nOn the positive side, you can shutdown a thread by "resolving it".
382682
Atom efficiency is usually talked about in terms of being good or bad.  It isn't usually quantified.  However, if you are interested in the organic products you can that you are "wasting" the water.  In terms of atoms that would be 2 acetic acid molecule over all products equalling 14 atoms product over 25 atoms total products or 56% atom effiency.  For mass efficiency, you take the mass of desired over the mass total (52%).  Mass efficiency is different from atom efficiency.  In organic reactions, people like to talk about reactions being atom economical instead of efficient.  However, the concept of atom economy is not universally liked in the chemistry community.  If the byproduct is benign but has a large mass and is easily disposed of, that advantageous compared to a reaction that produces a byproduct that is lower in mass but has hazardous properties.
259973
This weblink will explain the differance between the 2\nhttp://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gorry/eg2069/async.html
208227
It means that for each 2 turns on one gear, there are 3 turns on the other (though I assume you know that already).  The efficiency is related to friction loss-the greater the ratio difference, the greater the force transer and thus friction loss, so the lowest ratio difference is the one with the least friction loss.\nThere is no change in distance from the fulcrum on a see-saw unless you are talking about the very small bending of the board, and that is likely too little to overcome other small forces, such as friction, movement of the people on the seat, etc.
768138
No.  An effective manager will provide positive and negative feedback.  However, the negative feedback should be constructive, not just "You suck at x, y, and z."  Employees need to know what is good and what is bad regarding their work.  If they never heard the negative side, they would never know what needs improving.
495190
to prove learning is better or more effective in what we see( observe) not what we hear...perform a task completely in silence...mime for the class to repeat it...have a second group perform the same task only verbal  count the number of students in each group who completes the task correctly you will be surprised at the results.
309355
"better" is a relative term.  What one user likes and another user likes can be different.
576595
a closed system has the ability to return information to the begining, it can have inputs and outputs as long as something returns to start the cycle over\n\nfirst sign of intelligence, see,think,do,feedback
1103367
it depends society always looks for wyas of making work easier, thus one would say improvment is the use of machines makeing manuel labor safer and easier, and reducing costs, but then one must decide if it is worth the pollution and look at america now, with little manuel labor we have become fatter, so either way there are cosats to which improves a country.