Charter Change: Solution for Economic Crisis-Agree or Disagree Explain?
143151
Whose charter to change and which economic crisis, you need a little more context for someone to answer this.
56330
it sure isn't doing what the PEOPLE want.  Instead they do what the minority wants and don't care about the rest.  It's going after the bill of rights to the point we should call them the bill of privledges.  The economy isn't doing good and we are pouring money into a 'war' that is not going good.
528121
Continually look for the best company to provide your goods or service.  We are in this state because people just accept it.  If everybody shopped around for the best deal then businesses who remained complacent would go out of business.  By having to compete in the market place their prices would fall.  \n\nAs for the government and their stealth taxes, we all have to vote to get rid of Labour and keep the Tories out.  I doubt the Lib Dems will be any better but at least the big two will get the message that we are sick of being ripped off by their policies which are pro big business.
995289
All of it. It is all under review, and due for a complete overhaul upgrade. Some aspects will be kept similar or the same, but the majority of the rules are expected to change toward more complicated, difficult to understand terms and conditions, allowing more loopholes, even though the authorities claim the purpose is to simplify and make it so anyone can understand. This is a commonplace political tactic used globally, particularly in Western countries, to impede the public understanding and increase control and ability to manipulate the masses for unjust purposes. There is very little you can do about this, now that you know. Sorry.
278672
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7772696530684663669&q=Loose+Change+2nd+Edition\n\nplease watch this informative video..it may help
633831
The principles of capitalism are the same everywhere. Its the law that interferes. Indian govt and law are only getting towards free trade - they still have lot of communistic policies
972184
The Hindu : Opinion / Editorials : ON THE RIGHT TRACK \nThe previous Government might as well have called for ... laws to increase flexibility in employment contracts have been on the agenda since 2001. ...\nhttp://www.hindu.com/2004/07/08/stories/2004070801301000.htm - \n\n\n\nhttp://indiacode.nic.in/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=192308+&tfnm2=5 \n... Government may specify in respect of each such employment, contracts any disease ... any employment specified in Part C of Schedule III contracts any ...\nhttp://indiacode.nic.in/qrydisp.asp?tfnm=192308+&tfnm2=5
976832
Everyday, some where in this country, a court case is heard regarding disagreement with an exec tor as to a decision they made.  They must make those decisions in accordance with the perceived wishes of the decedent and the desires of the beneficiaries while remaining within the law.  That can be a tough order.
1131071
The original change from feudalism was done thru revolution. The same goes for Russia. The change to quasi-capitalism is made thru choice and a realizaton that pure socialism does not work. It is a wonderful consept on paper but due to human nature it does not work.
751630
aside from the lies that it's based upon and the false political \nreasons that started it, it's become a money issue . what can one do when legislature goes bad ? Normal needs it for monetary reasons : if they do their job they lose there job....   u can imagine what's under the table.....justice can't prevail in a pentocrisy on the take one of the problems with capitalism w/out conscience.\nIt's probably unconstitutional ...
701871
I am writing from the US, but if this were an American organization I would check the charter document (Certificate of Incorporation) and By-Laws regarding the percentage of vote required to propose (as opposed to approve) a merger, as well as quorum provisions.  I would guess a simple majority, of not just a motion and a seconding of the motion, would be enough.\n\nAs for the substance of the measure and voting it up or down, look through ALL the by laws, and maybe Robert's Rules of Order, and try to use them to get your way, or at least to block what you don't want.\n\nIt's like a chess game, although of course much more serious.\n\nGood luck.
1061689
We had no choice. In 1975 we voted to join the Common Market with Europe, not a common government, which is what has gradually happened. Our current government has allowed this, and has split the country up, without asking the electorate first, into 12 regions, per the EU's Regions of Europe plan.\n\nWe're too far integrated into the union to leave now though. Such a move could collapse the economy. We need the EU now, and they need us. We didn't do too badly before it. However, the majority are against it. Consequently, the British government won't hold a referendum on it, even though many times they've scheduled dates for a national vote on whether we should join the single currency, which have all been postponed, because they know they'd be defeated.\n\nRegularly, laws are being applied to the UK and other countries, from Brussels, the seat of the EU government. But a big issue currently is companies making crazy cost-cuts by outsourcing to other countries, which is affecting the economy, reducing it to a services-based economy, with very few manufacturing industries left.\n\nBut the EU has big problems; currently a corrupt, bottomless pit where money mysteriously disappears on a regular basis. As it stands, It's too big to be unified as a single European state, and is already straining under its own weight from the immense bureaucracy, red tape and a myriad of languages to translate its documents into.\n\nAs for the Pound, the fight is on to save the 1300-year-old currency. A few other countries of Europe are fighting to retain their national currencies too. So far, it's just a minority that supports joining the single currency. It seems very much as if the EU, with the help of its pro-Euro camp in Britain, is trying to weaken the Pound to a point where one day accept we'll have to accept the Euro, which may eventually be stronger. It's already begun; UK-based companies find it more expensive trading from here with other countries because of the extra fees incurred changing Pounds to Euros. As soon as the two currencies are harmonised, it's we'll likely join. If we'd joined earlier, maybe companies wouldn't have moved to Euro countries, production to China or call centres to India.\n\nBut if we don't decide on it soon, there might not be many companies of worth left in this country, as the most profitable ones will have moved somewhere cheaper.
763556
Most people voted for "change". That is what the Dem's promised... The question is What change..  The economy- Best its ever been\nUnemployment-Lowest its ever been\nTax breaks-Dem's promise to increase taxes\n  We will have to wait and see what "change" is , good or bad it was never explained just promised..
1096810
Well wait for the next one on the Republic, this will get through.\n\nHopefully we can have one on the new industrial relations law.\n\n (former Howard supporter)
394610
the charter change is already a long proposal by the local officials of the different provinces of visayas and mindanao...\nmost of the people of these area wants federalism because they feel that most of gov attention is derected in metro manila and other provinces have slow growth...\nhowever most senators and ones in power dont have the political will to pursue change for their own agenda... Pres.Ramos proposed charter change before then the senate opposed to it...Erap tried to propose it then it was rejected again..\nby far Gloria has the most succes in pushing it but as we see now many senators are against it again, the same senators who run under her slate and supported her agenda. whether what is the motivation behind Gloria's attemp for cha-cha..only her will know...\nher allies will say its for the best of the country while her critics will say its her plot to avoid allegations against her and to stay in power...\nas for me, i think parliamentary-federal is a better system of gov based on performances of other countries...\nbut system alone is not enough, the people in gov must also change for the better for it to succeed...
1074505
NO.\nToo many business interests across the board. Each state is dependant to some degree on another state.\nToo many people of every walk of life depends on the other to stay afloat.
794681
Corporate charters\n\nStates began granting corporate charters to businesses, if the business promised to be an asset to the public economy.