Hearsay ...can hearsay be used in court if the original source is dead?
141125
Under certain circumstances, the inavailability of the witness will make hearsay admissable.  However, some states have a doctrine that makes the words of the dead even harder to use as evidence.\n\nYou'd need more facts.
861525
If you can prove it yes,  but it has to be within the statute time of your state or Government,\n\nThe evidence is what will get you a win,  but you will have to use it as proof to win,  that means produce the evidence say you were wrongfully punished and sue the crap out of that community.
358128
Of course you can. But first you should gather your evidence.  Your attorney will want to know every tiny detail. Also, the more information you have, the better your case will be.
1168313
I don't think that would work you calling saying your dead, how can a dead man call his work...
1017
The route for this would be to file a civil claim for the benefits. As part of the evidentiary process, DNA samples could be taken from his relatives and your son to determine if he is related to the deceased without exhuming the body. I would talk to a local civil estate lawyer.
372840
Yes, if the higher court wishes to hear it.  It isn't very likely that they would hear your case though.
679932
A mistrial, you mean?\n\nYou may get your case appealed if you have reasonable proof that the trial or the proceedings before the trial were unlawful.
1124727
Yes you can but there are somethings you need to be aware of...you need to read any small disclaimers on the commercals and listen to the wording becaseu some false claims can really turn out not to be false by the wording they use...just misleading to the public who views it only in passing and dosen't take in all the information like the small print...so I'd get a consult and make sure you had a case before you did anything
116579
Only if there is a standing warrent issued by a judge.  Otherwise, SUE SUE SUE!!! :D
344761
Proposition 115 is an exception to the hearsay rule as it applies to preliminary hearings. Testimony about traffic infactions can be part of a preliminary hearing, so your answer is yes. \n\nIf you are asking if they apply at traffic court, I would have to say no.
631286
Yes, but it all depends on the situation. Call a lawyer and when you meet with him/her, ask to see if your record can be exspunged.
511159
I found this information, but it was in regards to Tennessee. I would imagine that most states have a law likened to this one, which is based on the federal statue. I'm in Louisiana and know that as long as you are a party in the conversation, then it would be admissable.\n\nEvidentiary issues. Individuals and businesses that make surreptitious recordings often do so with the expectation that the recordings will be useful as evidence.  Under Tennessee law, an undisclosed recording you might make would be admissible into evidence so long as a court finds it relevant to issues at hand in the case, and it would also be admissible to show that a witness either lied on a particular point of testimony or made a prior inconsistent statement, or has a bias in the case.  The one requirement is that the "tape recordings (or) transcripts... (are) presented in evidence by (a) witness who was present during their recording or who monitored the conversations, if he was so situated and circumstanced that he was in a position to identify the declarant with certainty."  State v. Jones, 598 S.W.2d 209, 223 (Tenn. 1980).  Now, you can't admit a tape into testimony just to show that a witness is a lowlife, but there are generally a number of ways to get the tape into evidence, though they will require an attorney to know the right way to do so.
966255
Do you mean re-creating the crime scene for witnesses?\nThis would not be possible for the most part, as we would have no realistic idea of what sounds/odour were there at the time.  \nThe best option we have is interviewing witnesses as soon as possible after the fact so that information is fresh in their minds.   You are right though, sometimes a witness will leave out something that the investigator may not think to ask at the time.
991390
You may be able to go down to the local police department if you are a family member and are simply interested. A local historian my also have information that the report may not to talk to him/her if you want any more info. But I don't live out there so I don't know the specific rules that say what you can and can't do regarding information like a coroner's report.
1113615
You would have to present evidence that you were detained without probable cause in order to have a case. You don't need to prove beyond reasonable doubt, just a preponderence of the evidence as this is a civil matter. It's hard to tell precisely if you would have a case based on your details, but I would guess that you have an uphill climb if it boils down to your word versus theirs. It might be advisable to consult a lawyer about this, but only if you truly feel that this was a case of police abuse of power.
44092
Yes.Try to talking to a lawyer to get the fact's...
1122506
no, its 90% inaccurate & inadmissable in a court of law. to take it could only serve against you. refuse it.