i would like the christian belief of the alfred wegener theory?
26943
It appears that the question period has expired.  If you have received an answer that meets your needs, please choose one of those as a 'best answer.'  If you haven't received a good answer for your question, you may want to consider the following,\n\n1) Re-post your question.  Newer questions get more activity on Yahoo! Answers than old ones.\n2) If you do re-post your question, consider why it wasn't answered the first time.  Could it be more specific?  Could it be worded better? Were there grammatical or spelling errors? Was it in the best category?\n\nIf it doesn't seem likely that re-posting your question will help you, then here's a listing of my favorite 'answer sites'.  Maybe one of them will help you.\n\nAnswers.com http://www.answers.com/\nBartleby http://www.bartleby.com/\nYahoo Reference http://education.yahoo.com/reference/\nHowStuffWorks http://www.howstuffworks.com/\nWikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page\n\nSince I really haven't answered your question, it is not necessary to give me any points.  Regards.
766364
I'd suppose they believe in the scientific, mathematical, physics-driven Big Bang.  Which would be right. \n\nA THEORY can be proved mathematically. Faith doesn't involve math, sug. \n.
909374
I agree with everything but the notion of a sentient god / universe.\n\nEdit:\n\nWhy would I get a thumbs down for my opinon? ... must have been a christian.
203736
Christian Science was an attempt by Mary Baker Eddy.  However, I think that the rational world and religion don't have a common base at the present.  Maybe someday rationality and a sense of the deeper, spiritual side of humanity will find a common home. Spirituality and religion are not the same, however. Religion plus Science: no.  Spirituality plus Science: yes. I think the Great Chain of Being describes the potential, rather than the actual.  Everything is possible, every kind of being, but only some have been realized.  \nI see where you're going.  Is this an alternative to "Intelligent Design?"  Perhaps.  Evolution is real in the physical, material sense.  TGCOB makes sense on another level, that of alternate realities.  \nStay with it. I like where you're going.
82598
alfred wegener\njust learned this myself (:
398295
I am not a Christian, nor a pre-Christian.  What I would like to say however is that there is no "one sentence" that you can write to convert thinking people to Christianity.  You have to give proper evidence of your claims, and that would most likely take a lot more than one sentence.
1081331
I can't really rate him, as I have not followed his work closely, just what I've seen on the news or in the paper.\n\nI've heard that he is a conservative personally, and if he had his way he would put the Church back a couple of hundred years lol, but I've also heard that he is known for putting himself last and doing the will of God and the Church, even if he disagreed with them.\n\nI read his first paper (sorry, don't know the latin name it's called) and was very glad to see that his main theme was Love.  Mainly calling Christians to love God, love each other, and keep that as a focus in our lives.  That was good.
1153814
i am a muslim and i dont know much about what ur saying but i would like to say that opinions are just that opinions, so lets just say that hitler could have been christian or not.  either way it doesnt change anything because he was psychotic anyway
457530
It's as rational as anything else.  Do you actually think the Special Theory of Relativity and Quantum Physics make sense?  They don't seem to, but they're both true.  A better question might be, is Christianity rational to YOU?  So much of reality is perception based.  The Roman Catholic Church has committed countless atrocities throughout history, but it has also led many people to a greater peace and awareness.  Looking for absolute truth?  I advise against it.  "Those who believe they have the truth will never seek it."  Our journey is just beginning.
1079032
This is my belief:\n\nWe are here so that God can experience God's self.\n\nGod is absolute. In this state there are no contradictions and no relativity. Everything is constant, absolute.\n\nThere are no temperature fluctuations, for instance. How would you know it's hot, if you never experienced cold? How would you know you're tall, if you never saw someone shorter than you? How would you know love if you never experienced hate or fear?\n\nGod knows what God is, but the knowing of a thing and the experiencing of it are two entirely different things. For example you know what icecream is, but experiencing the taste of it is different (and SO much better) than just intellectually knowing that it is frozen cream and sugar.\n\nGod created life as we know it so that God could experience God's self in the world of relativity through us, who are each an individuation of the whole.\n\nGod does not judge us for our actions...after this physical incarnation ends we will return to the spiritual dimension and decide if we want to stay or experience another physical incarnation. This is how we serve God.
62617
Listen, don't get me wrong, I disagree almost 100% with almost every aspect of Schneb's worldview.\n\nHowever, I like the guy. Unlike many Christians he has come to where he is after a tremendous amount of study and reflection. I think that this is admirable.\n\nI've got a lot of respect for Schneb. I think he came up with the wrong solution, but he sure worked hard on the problem. He thinks that I have come up with the wrong solution, but so it goes.\n\nI have a problem with the people who blindly accept what they read or hear, taking the easy way out, and letting someone else do all that hard stuff, like "coming to your own conclusions."\n\nI often feel that it's not so much what you know, but how you think.
715669
You're probably a very intelligent person. But this time your guess is way off. I don't think you understand Christianity.
71374
It actually seems that a predisposition to believe in god may exist on a genetic level. This idea has been popularized by Dean Hamer, a bigwig at the National Cancer Institute.\n\nI haven't yet read the book, but I'm very curious as I seem to lack whatever genetic component this is.\n\nI certainly can't accept this as proof of a deity, but I'd like to know more about it.
645944
I think its a truly interesting concept, if it would be proved to be true the world as we know it would change.. Most of the foundations of Christianity would be rattled. If I think its true? well it most certainly provides a few answers to many of my questions. Lets just say if its fiction then its one of the best fiction books out there, and if its true, the world isn't ready for it yet. It isn't a book about atheists it never says Jesus never did miracles or didn't exist, it just states the possibility of him not dying on the cross and kind of gives a insight at what his life as a man (not the son of God but a man) might have been like.
605106
Freud had a lot to say about how we understand religion.  The (our) father being the dominant position.  People need something to believe in and someone to show them the way.  We are truly weak creatures...well...not all of us are...but A LOT of us really don't think before we invest our faith.
142584
The Bible suggests that humans are theomorphic, in the image of God.  But I think that men wrote this who had an anthropomorphic conception of God.  I think God is beyond any form like that.  Certainly he is not limited to some physical form.  For our benefit, God takes forms so that we can grasp some idea of what he is like.
652920
By Arthur Custance \n"Man in Adam and in Christ"\n\nTO MY MIND, one of the saddest and most disastrous results of the theory of evolution as applied to man is that it has led to an entirely false conception of what man's true nature is.\n\nIf human evolution is true in the sense that Huxley and Simpson have held it to be, then man is an angel in the making, changing steadily for the better as he moves further away from his animal ancestors. His propensity for wickedness is recognized as unfortunate, but more in the nature of a relapse, a temporary set-back, a kind of unfulfilled-ness, which there is every reason to believe he will in time grow out of.\n\nBut if man is a divinely created being who has fallen from grace and can by nature change only for the worse, then his propensity for wickedness is something more than merely evidence of unrealized potential. From the biblical point of view it is a demonstration that something has gone dreadfully wrong from which there now seems no possibility of self-recovery.