Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of PACs.?
154052
I could have sworn I answered this one already.  Perhaps more than one person asked it.\n\nA PAC (Political Action Committee) may exist in many organizations, but the ones we know most about are in unions.  The strength is primarily in numbers:  lots of union members who pay lots of dues, and therefore make lots of money available to the PAC.  The strength also exists in the form of arm-twisting.  An ordinary individual donor to a political party or candidate has a modest amount of influence over that party or candidate, even if he is wealthy enough to make a sizeable contribution.  As an individual, he has only one vote.  But a PAC is not just a lot of money, it is effectively control over a lot of votes.  So this makes the party (normally the Democratic Party, at least in the case of unions) vulnerable to threats of "Do it the way we say or we will turn all our money and votes against you." \n\nThe weakness is the credibility.  Too often the PAC twists the arms of people the members of the union don't want to vote for.  A union member, even if he knows what the union wants him to do (generally, vote straight Democrat), is also aware that he has a SECRET ballot, and may well vote for a different candidate, or support a No instead of the expected Yes on a given ballot initiative.  This is especially true if he resents being forced to pay to the union to get and keep his job.  A minority of union members, occasionally growing to a majority in decertification campaigns, are of this latter type.  They joined the union because they wanted the job it controls, but they resent every penny they pay in dues.\n\nDecertification is the answer for many of these woes.  It takes courage, because union loyalists are not always above fighting dirty when the chips are down, but it can be done.
488800
Here is the group you should ask: http://www.grefpac.org/
665737
Do u mean..\n"What are the weaknesses in Malaysian communications infrastructure?"\n\nTo name a few..\n1. Not all areas are covered\n2. Still expensive\n3. Monitoring and governance are still lacking
489897
Here's a few spots to look at.  Hope they help.\n\nRegards
233218
here's a good website and a lot of detail! \n\nhttp://www.usgcrp.gov/usgcrp/seminars/971105DD.html
832513
Directory assistance is a beautiful thing.\n\nDid you want to tell us WHICH candidate?
747037
You might consider starting the paper as a contest to the premise.\n\nWhy does your instructor want you to begin with the supposition that there were failures related to the liberal party?\n\nConsider, instead, of focusing on the positive - the successes of the liberal party (WPA, Hoover Dam, Pentagon, Tennessee Valley Authority etc....)\n\nThen, contrast that with some of the failures - perhaps consider interest rates during the 70's, and the Iran Hostage thing. \n\nThen, try to weigh the benefits against the losses.\n\nIf your instructor is truly interested in your grasp of the facts, you'll do well. If you fail - then perhaps your instructor has some issues.\n\nGood luck. God is on your side.
636748
please read this website it will explain all pass it to yor friends: http://mindprod.com/politics/abughraibpix.html#ABUGHRAIBPIX
1117447
I've made some damn good ones. Power point is quite fun to play with. If I win as best answer I'll email you one. :) Since I don't see any other way to share a presentation with you.
168684
CA has an Easytrieve version for Unix, but it's not going to run on a Mac or other small machines.  Besides, the technology is more designed for a larger installation where file definitions are done once and many different users are writing reports.
718985
Good\n\n1.Quick loading\n2.good information\n3.Easily Navigatable\n4.very less images\n5.Few advertisements\n6.cross browser compatibility\n7.Pleasing colors and design\n\nBad\n\n1.Large Image loading\n2.Cluttered information\n3.Annoying unwanted popups\n4.Bad taste of color and design
930600
http://www.aipac.org/
1101397
The weak point is that it is not used enough.  How f*cking stupid are you?  You are against it, but can't find a reason why.  You wouldn't happen to be a top ranking Democrat, would you?
299542
research the contents well.......while making the slides dont make the back ground too bright ......use normal fonts with medium size....no animations or distrating music......logical pictures can be used.....most important is while presenting be confident.....
3598
I think Cerdic and D. M. W. make some good points; I'd like to expand a little bit. The key, as with most things, is 'strength in numbers.' That's why joining with a like-minded organization is helpful, you have a large number of people, motivated to action. When a politico is bombarded with large volumes of mail from unhappy constituents, he has no choice but to take notice. Another important factor is publicity. There's nothing a politician hates more than to have his dirty little secrets revealed. And yes, you must be persistent, as persistent as a lava flow. Best of luck to you.\n"Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny." -Lazarus Long\n"That government is best which governs least." -Thomas Paine
1146933
That's interesting. Really.\nI didn't look through the whole site.  So government funding advertising and campaign, with no private donations or little if using a match system.  It may work, but there are possible problems.  \nHow much money\nCould any candidate qualify with signatures, I'm not trying to be totally exclusive, but I also don't want any moron with a few signatures using taxpayers money to run a stupid campaign that endorses some stupid agenda, like wicans or something.\nAnd there's an extra commission or committee every year to determine equity in the funding.\nAnd it is kind of socialist.  Just kind of, don't get mad.\nI'm not trying to be negative, just thinking of pitfalls.\n\nIt is something to think about.
603124
This should be a good start:\nhttp://www.fgcu.edu/support/office2000/access/