What are the two ways of handling multi vender connectivity?
141766
I'm not sure I understand your question, could you please be more specific?
381137
You have dual.I've met many people with dual it can come in handy.
83184
You could use Fuzzy Sighted Link State (FSLS) routing.\n\n FSLS includes an optimal algorithm called Hazy Sighted Link State (HSLS), which sends a link state update (LSU) every 2k* T to a scope of 2k,where k is hop distance and T is the minimum LSU transmission period. Thus, both FSR and FSLS achieve potential scalability by limiting the scope of link state update dissemination in space and over time. \n\nTheoretical analysis on routing overhead and optimization for this type of “myopic” routing can be found in. Optimized Link State Routing Protocol — Optimized Link\nState Routing Protocol (OLSR) is a Link State (LS)  protocol. It periodically exchanges topology information with other nodes in the network. The protocol uses multipoint relays (MPRs) to reduce the number of “superfluous” broadcast packet retransmissions and also the size of the LS update packets, leading to more efficient flooding of control messages in the network.\n\nor a LS or OLS of some kind. if very large, stay away from LS....use some type of OLS or the FSLS.
1146741
Well try a shippping term called "Grouppage" which means you can share a container with two or three merchants having small shipments similar to yours. \n\nAlso this can be studied better if you can specify your shipping origin and destination.
526998
use a gateway which supports both the ends.\nmore info on http://www.cisco.com
984407
In most cases you just report them both.  This would be called a "bimodal" distribution.  (You absolutely DON'T average them.)  A related question is what do do when it's a 3-way or more tie for most common.  Usually in that case you say there is "no mode" because nothing is more frequent than anything else.
1009149
A network hub with both types of connection will do it. Probably cant get an actual hub, since most such devices are switches these days
199469
Neither of the previous two solutions are secure.\n\nTry \n\nhttp://www.veritas.com\n\nor\n\nhttp://www.emcinsignia.com\n\nNote to previous answerers: Read the question, then answer it.
346719
go to mapquest.com\n\nput in both addresses and get answer
405055
use LAN cable.\nif you want to connect more than 2 computer. use a router and a hub. \nall computer can be used to acces the internet at the same time.
868579
I found this article that might give you some suggestions:\n\nhttp://www.networkcomputing.com/showitem.jhtml?articleID=160910914&pgno=1\n\nplrr
146200
You should contact GMAC to find out what their procedure is to handle the transaction.  I imagine this is a pretty common occurence, so I'm certain they'll be able to lay out what to do and how to do it to expedite the transactio.
866263
Token passing is an excellent way to eliminate collisions.  Only stations with "the token" are permitted to communicate...kind of like "raising your hand" in a classroom to prevent everyone from talking at the same time.\n  \nThis is fundamentally different from the CSMA/CD technology that standard ethernet uses to reduce collisions.  (basically...after a collision, each station waits a random amount of time before retransmitting):\nhttp://www.webopedia.com/TERM/C/CSMA_CD.html
537137
I'd do the same, but use IPX. Its more secure.
521870
This is a networking problem - look up 'Linear Bus', 'Star' or 'Hub', 'Token Ring' and 'Fully Connected Mesh'.\n\nYou need 21 for a fully connected topology, but you could do it with far less.
161234
you might look into getting a Virtual Private Network.  It's a secure, internet based technology where you can connect between PCs in different locations.
173957
plug the 2nd in as a slave or connect the two through a network