Can anyone please provide a logic model of any company.tnx.c:?
153654
I can give you Microsoft´s\n\n1. Find the best\n2. Get it, imporve it, copy it or kill it.\n3. Find ways to stop other from making the same to you.
1166488
There's no one as such. And if there exists one, it won't share the same position after the next 14 days as after each 14 days, updates by the companies are released.\n\nRegards\n(Siddharth Razdan)
241298
Heres a good one...\nhttp://del.icio.us/
99632
One of the best models I have ever seen is the CANSLIM model of successful stocks built by William J. O'Neil.\n\nIn this model, Mr. O'Neil tracks 100's of datapoints for the most successful stocks over the past decades. He then isolated the following seven charateristics of winning stocks.\n\nC - Current EPS growth over 25%, past two quarters\nA - Annual EPS growth over 25%, past five years\nN - New - New His, New Company, New Management, New Product\nS - Supply - Look for strong volume and small float.\nL - Leaders - The most powerful stocks lead the market.\nI - Insitutional Sponsorship - Successful institutional ownership increasing their holdings.\nM - 3 our of 4 stocks decline in bear markets. O'Neil teaches how to indentify rallies.\n\nO'Neil himself details how he turned his savings into a seat on the New York Stock Exchange by the time he was 30.\n\nThere are numerous stories of people who have based entire careers on the teachings of O'Neil. Many of the most successful traders in the United States cite William O'Neil as the best stock market educator.\n\nYou can buy his book How to Make Money in Stocks in any bookstore for about $20. If you subscribe to his paper, you are not hit up for $10,000 seminars. William O'Neil and Company operate with more integrity than any company I have ever encountered.
919375
from bseindia.com > bhavcopy \n\ndetails on tech analysis visit my answers
324244
sinx + xcosx  (product rule)
557864
What analysis tool do you intend to use?  You talk about use-cases so it might be UML.\n\nIf so, I can suggest 2 possibilities that are different from stabndard business models:  A charitable organisation; programming a game like Monopoly.
53234
Think this maybe what your looking for dude:\nhttp://yhoo.client.shareholder.com/press/management.cfm
1060068
what is the name of the company, or ticker? if you have that you can find the cusip number.. http://www.quantumonline.com/search.cfm?tickersymbol=UUU&sopt=symbol
354429
This site should help\n\nhttp://www.technologystudent.com/struct1/model1.htm
49945
Check out the below link. Its good. These are some interview questions on logic design that was online.\n\nhttp://ceaspub.eas.asu.edu/cse517/interview.html
919383
microsoft\ndell \nlinux\napple\nhp\ntoshiba\nibm\nfujitsu\nsony\nCompaq\nE-Machines\nGateway
1147549
http://pib.nic.in/feature/feyr2003/fmay2003/f120520031.html\n\nhttp://mnes.nic.in/business%20oppertunity/retset.htm
1025593
Maybe the Better Business Bureau would have one. Maybe research Worldcom or Enron.
128724
Check this out, it's awsome:\nhttp://www.4c-foresee.com/
905859
Excellent Question!!! I'm truly putting this on the watchlist.. because I can't really come with something witty right now... don't take this from me okay? I'm just brainstorming with you: How about saying that given that the company itself has a "sterling" reputation... I look forward to contributing to it with quantitative and community contributions through my enthusiasm, team spirit and hardwork... (cause they like results, eh?)... So in plain terms what you're here for is to deliver results that forwards their company.. after all.. every bit of effort definitely helps! Does this help? I'm still staying tuned to see other answers!! Good luck!
6029
excerpt:\n\nSamsung Electronics, the world's largest maker of computer memory chips, pleaded guilty Wednesday to a charge it participated in a worldwide price-fixing conspiracy that damaged competition and raised PC prices.\n\nProsecutors said Samsung, which is based in Seoul, South Korea, and other companies conspired in e-mails, telephone calls and in-person meetings to fix the price of chips used in personal computers and other electronic devices.\n\nThe outcome of the investigation also is expected to help fuel a private antitrust case filed by Rambus Inc., which licensed a memory technology that had been embraced by Intel Corp., the world's largest maker of the microprocessor brains of computers.\n\nIn 1996, Intel chose Rambus technology to help speed up systems running its then-upcoming Pentium 4.\n\nBut the chip makers did not want to pay Rambus royalties. DRAM prices fell sharply - so much so that Intel agreed to support non-Rambus technology in the fall of 2001.\n\nShortly after that, DRAM prices nearly quadrupled.