Please explain the law of change.?
143351
Every thing and every person is constanting changing in accord with natural laws or in accord with the actions of personal beings.  \n\nThere is an equilibrium between matter and energy.  The concept of endlessly increasing entropy is useful on relatively microcosmic levels, but it does not correctly describe the macrocosm.\n\nThe macrocosm is advancing towards perfection.  The subunits also are, but their progress is somewhat more erratic, particularly in the early stages.
464944
NONE.  All things were created!  Things adapt to changing environments, but they never turn into something entirely new.
765255
fate?\nMurphy's law?\n\n...are you trying to solve a crossword puzzle? How many letters? and do you have any of the letters already?
821503
as long as no new substance is formed and the change is not permanent/irreversible,it is physical change
788084
It derives from one of Newton's Laws. In the simplest terms - when you exert force on an object, that object will move in a direction and distance exactly equal and opposite to the force you applied. But, the saying as we use it goes beyond this physical explanation. I think it refers to the fact that all your actions have consequences and that therefore you should consider things carefully before you act. Things we do affect other people and those effects can change the world.
11531
The second law of thermodynamics is a general principle which places constraints upon the direction of heat transfer and the attainable efficiencies of heat engines. In so doing, it goes beyond the limitations imposed by the first law of thermodynamics. It's implications may be visualized in terms of the waterfall analogy. It's fundamental principle is entropy: In any cyclic process the entropy will either increase or remain the same.\n\nBasically, creationists believe in that the 2nd Law defines intention. An ordered process. But it has been disproven 100 years ago.
351098
This is the "if things are always meant to go to greater entropy, how can random molecumels reverse entropy and become organized" argument, right?  Ok-If you really thought that nothing could go from a state of disorganization to a state of organization, THEN you would have a good reason not to clean your room, stack the dishes neatly, build a house from a pile of bricks, etc etc.  Obviously, things can go from a state of disorganization to a state of organization-it happens constantly, all the time.  First, the law is involved in closed systems, where there is a set amount of energy-Clearly, Earth gets a whole whopping amount of energy every day, or everything WOULD fall apart.  But even in a local sense, life and evolution DO increase entropy, just like building a house from a pile of bricks does.  The equation is one of energy usage as well as organization.  The energy that turns into waste heat (maximum entropy) in the process of building a house, or building an animal, is greater than the organization that results from that energy.  So, you have to generate a lot of waste heat to get a little organization, and even in this small system you have increased entropy-Surely you can feel it that the energy to do the dishes is *way* more than the resultant organized dishes...  Evolution has used up an enormous amount of energy, and increased entropy-and the only way it can work is that it gets a constant large infusion of new energy all the time, from the sun (or geothermal processes in the case of deep sea extremophiles)- In a very real sense, life is ac extremely wasteful proposition, like the worst chronic shoppaholic-but its ok for the shopaholic, if they are given a billion dollars a day to do it.
826510
Chaos or in layman's language the 'change' is most constant as most of the learned answerers have replied. In physics also the most constant is change which sounds like a paradox. Truth in its final form is a paradox. Because we are in a world of illusions. The ultimate is non-elusiveness or changelessness.
578757
God is the same. God will never change. Man cannot change God just because times change.
235633
Relationships grow and change over time.  There is no guarantee of what the future holds other than change.
132159
Open up your thermodynamics book and do your own homework.\nHint.. add the energy required to raise the temp from 100C to 112C plus the energy used to change state, plus the energy used to go from 76C to 100C.  You should have all the info you need in your problem, and the energy required to do the change is in your book.
436081
There you have the 2nd (I think) law od thermodynamics.\n\nLook it up, but it's the commonly quoted one about entropy always increasing in a closed system.\n\nIn laymans terms, the amount of disorder always increases, as things naturally seek a lower energy state.  Eventually, when the universe is 'run down' it will consist only of a uniform soup of particles.\n\nFortunately we don't have to worry about that quite yet!"
103297
Theories are more complex than laws, where laws describe only one action or phenomena, theories explain the mechanisms behind the phenomena and related phenomena. \n\nAn example of a law is the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states:\nThe total entropy of any thermodynamically isolated system tends to increase over time, approaching a maximum value.  \n\nThe theory of gravity, on the other hand, governs everything from falling bodies, forces of attraction between bodies, and planetary motion.  It describes a wide range of phenomena, and is far more detailed than the Second Law of Thermodynamics.  \n\nTheories are also mutable and evolve as better information becomes available.  The Second Law of Thermodynamics will not and does not change, but gravity theory is evolving as discoveries are made in the field of quantum mechanics.\n\nI found this on a website; it may be helpful in describing the difference between theory and law:\nAn analogy can be made using a slingshot and an automobile. \n\nA scientific law is like a slingshot. A slingshot has but one moving part--the rubber band. If you put a rock in it and draw it back, the rock will fly out at a predictable speed, depending upon the distance the band is drawn back. \n\nAn automobile has many moving parts, all working in unison to perform the chore of transporting someone from one point to another point. An automobile is a complex piece of machinery. Sometimes, improvements are made to one or more component parts. A new set of spark plugs that are composed of a better alloy that can withstand heat better, for example, might replace the existing set. But the function of the automobile as a whole remains unchanged. \n\nA theory is like the automobile. Components of it can be changed or improved upon, without changing the overall truth of the theory as a whole. \n(Comes from the first site listed in Sources)\n\nHope this is helpful :-)
954232
no body know what going to happen tommorrow what is today is important .\ndont think about the destiny. Destiny  can be changed when  we can bring a changes in present situation which bring change in you future directly effect on your destiny.\nDont get dicourage by surrendering every thing in the hand of destiny.\nevery thing is not in the hand of destiny.
745911
the role of law has changed to the "roll" of law,\nie bankroll of law. example: OJ Simpson, Ken Lay,Ted Kennedy, and Micheal Jackson.\nthe law is only relevant to those who are bound\nto live by it.
100380
The universe has been shown to be decaying.  It is going from an orderly state to a disorderly state.  This is called entropy.\n\nThere is no known natural force or law in the universe that reverses this.  On a small scale, we can see that our intelligence reverses disorder temporarily.\n\nTherefore, on a universal scale, there must be an intelligence (obviously an intelligence far beyond ours) with the power to set the universe in order to start with.  These are two of the attributes of God.\n\nSo, yes, order in the universe is a proof of God.\n\n-------------------------\n\nTo address some flaws in a previous answer's argument:\n\nThe "Laws of nature" are just another way of saying "the rules of order."  And like any procedure, someone makes the rules.  Like a basketball game, there could be any set of rules, but the ones that are used are what distinguish it from being a hockey game.  And these rules were decided upon by intelligent beings.\n\nAlso, it is not true that all things must lead to infinite regression.  Infinite regression is only one possibility; the other is infinite existence -- in other words, God.
278672
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7772696530684663669&q=Loose+Change+2nd+Edition\n\nplease watch this informative video..it may help