Will Agassi win another Grandslam? If so which one?
147153
no he is at that point is his career where he may come close but never actually win it, at this point he is just to old
471290
He is a Spanish tennis star.I am his fan. He is the current defending champion of the on-going Monte Carlo Masters tournament. Today, he thrashed Coria to qualify for the semi-final. I hope he retains his title this year.
487696
1.Greg Rusedski\n2.Andy Murray\n3.Tim Henman\n\nthe ranking points are very close - and the order appears to change every week.\n\nMurray will certainly be clear at the top this time next year.
383087
No, I don't think he will.\n\nHowever, I believe he shall reach one more Grand Slam final, probably at the United States Open.\n\nRoger Federer and Andy Roddick shall never again win a major title. That is, at least, my prediction. However, I am very unsure.\n\nI believe the following years shall be dominated by a comeback by Juan Carlos Ferrero and James Blake, Guillermo Coria, Rafael Nadal, Marcos Baghdatis, Andy Murray, and Francisco Verdasco.\n\nAlso, Nikolay Davydenko and David Nalbandian will continue to linger barely inside the TOP 10.
508723
Highly unlikely. \nYes, he has achieved an amazing amount of success for such a young player. He won the French Open last year, he's closing in on the all-time record for consecutive clay-court wins, he's already risen to #2 in the world. But it is going to be next to impossible to take over the #1 ranking as a one-surface player.\nI know a lot has been made of Nadal's progress on hardcourts, but many recent clay-courters have achieved some success on hardcourts. There is a big difference between winning a tournament or two on a surface and becoming a real threat for the Majors on that suface. Lets not forget that Federer has had much more success on clay than Nadal has had on hardcourts (let alone grass).\nUntil or unless Nadal picks up his game away from the red stuff, he's unlikely to seriously threaten Federer's reign at the top of the mens game.
1034312
Federer seems like a pretty good bet. He's won the last three and he looks like he's adjusting to grass well this year.\nOn the women's side there's not really a clear favorite but Sharapova's got a decent chance. Maybe Mauresmo too.
1031873
For the men Federer, but it would be great if Agassi could pull it out.    For the women, Henin-Hardinne
42677
Hey Jesus, Agassi is not a women, and I think Henin Hardenne is going to win after watching yesterday's semifinal game against Maria Sharapova.
426851
I think Mark has been struggling with his form before his China Open win, something that is reflected in his slide down the World Rankings. I think they key for Mark will be getting past the first two matches. If he can successfully do that and build up some momentum, then he stands a very good chance indeed.
312378
Well I'm always a stickler for an underdog, and as no \npast crucible champion has retained it first time, my money is on Shaun Murphy.\n\nHowever watching Williams play, and O'Sullivan beating Ryan Day last night I really believe it's between the three of them.\n\nNB: Refer to Tommy's answer, if Ronnie wins it this year it will be his third World Title.
348792
Goosen shot 6 under par. Mickelson shot 4 under par. \n3 days left in tournament.Northern Irelands Graeme McDowell leads on 8 under par.
542973
nope and to be honest i dont really care as i cant stand the arrogance of him.\n\nnadal is going to win the french open by beating federer again :)
666466
He has the game to. Great blend of power and guile. If he stays injury-free, he stands a great chance of winning a Major. Most likely an Australian or US Open. The hards-courts suit his game perfectly.
426535
I think Nadal has a decent chance to repeat, however there are many good competitors on this surface. I would'nt dismiss the possibility of Federer capturing this title, but he reminds me too much of Sampras, somewhat impatient for an outstanding clay court player. Look out for Nalbaldian, Gaudio, Coria and Davydenko!
271638
I say Pete Sampras but Roger could be coming up also
455885
You would have to bet on Phil. He's the best golfer in the world right now(sorry to disappoint all of you Tiger fans) Phil is just playing at a higher level than anyone else right now.
695331
No, but he is among the greatest players of alltime. The fact of\nthe matter is, if he was able to win the US Open a few times,\nhe might not have left the game so early. He could have been\nthe greatest player ever, since the rate he was winning Slams during his peak years was even better than Sampras. His failure to win the US Open, despite four trips to the final, is what ultimately forced him to retire prematurely. If he had won even once in those four trips, I'm guessing he would have hung around the sport longer. Another factor is he didn't like to play so frequently, and the new rules that were coming into play would\nhave forced him to do that to retain his world ranking. Those two\nfactors probably had more to do with anything else for the reasons he didn't retire in his 30s, instead of his mid 20s, when\nmost players are about to hit their prime, or are in their prime.\n   No one has able to achieve the French Open-Wimbledon\ndouble in the same year since Borg did it (1976, 1978,1979,1980). Jim Courier (won 1993 French Open, lost in 1993 Wimbledon final), Rafael Nadal (won 2006 French Open and lost in 2006 Wimbledon final) and Roger Federer (lost 2006 French Open final, and won 2006 Wimbledon final) have come the closest in this regard. Ivan Lendl and Stefan Edberg also came close. Ivan Lendl won the 1987 French Open but lost in the 1987 Wimbledon final to Pat Cash. Stefan Edberg lost in the 1989 French Open final to Michael Chang and the 1989 Wimbledon final to Boris Becker. Bjorn Borg the French Open six times, but it wasn't in 6 consecutive years (1974, 1976, 1978-1981). Manuel Orantes won the French Open in 1975, while\nGuillermo Vilas won the 1977 French Open men's singles title.\nI think Borg didn't play the French Open in 1975 or 1977, but I'm\nnot sure. He did win Wimbledon five consecutive years (1976-1980), and made the final in 1981. Roger Federer has a chance\nto equal Borg's modern era record in 2007 and has to reach the final in 2008 to equal Borg's mark of 41 consecutive wins at \nWimbledon in the modern era. I forgot about how close John\nMcEnroe came in 1984 to winning the French Open against\nIvan Lendl. He went on to win Wimbledon and the US Open\nthat same season. I think his 1984 season is still one of the greatest seasons in tennis history for a male or female player.