What incident do u think that caused Osama Bin Laden to target & bombed his own country>>Saudi Arabia?
153751
Saudi Arabia is pro USA .Ben Laden is Saudi born but has not been wecomed in his country for many years. Saudi has arrested many of Ben Ladens followers.It is really one of the few pro American Arab nations.
689079
who are you?   Osama Bin Laden?
1131636
Zarkawi isn't bin Laden. Zarkawi didn't attack on 9/11. But it's nice to know this nut case is dead.
925344
Bin Laden "claimed" responsibility, those that preformed the act were in fact Muslims in America illegally...Those that hate Bush can make up the wildest stories and convoluted conspire theories but cannot justify how Janet Reno illegally used military tanks and poison gas outlawed by their ally the U.N. to murder American citizens in Waco Texas. \n  Make a list of the facts...Then believe what you will! You will do that anyway!
858922
i think it is bush and bin-laden. not america. dont get us confused.
29348
Probably Osama and his goons.......
779876
The folks at the Pentagon no longer let me sit in on the intelligence briefings.  I do know that Iraq did not cause 911, and nobody in the government has ever said it did.  I don't know where this inaccurate info came from .  Why would you think you would be in the loop in regards to the status on bin laden?  Don't you think that the fewer the people know what's going on, the better chances we have in catching him off guard?
514172
I think Osama Bin Laden is a good example!!
637765
Saudi Arabia ofcourse
48174
First of all It's Osama Bin Ladin. He is just like u and me but more desperate, he had seen more brutality than us, has more money and a god damn organisation. He just like us hated when our brothers and sisters are hurt and killed without proper reasons but he acted differently. He just took a step a little further. He is said to be involved in 9/11 attacks. If that's true he did something really wrong. But to him it's fine coz America did and doing the same thing to his muslim brothers and sisters. Whatever it is, he shouldn't have done that. Now, there's no difference between him and America.
904832
Let's face it Bin Laden is a lot more useful to the US free and alive. Nice boggey man to scare your spastic population into doing whatever the wealthy want.
556952
Kuwait - and they had their eye on Saudi Arabia which would have been next.  We stormed over there practically overnight to oppose it.
475164
osama bin laden, has ordered people killed. thats enough without going into bombs he built or trained children to build and carry on them or tell there parent he will have them killed if their parents to wear these bombs into crowds of innocent people and commit suicide. plus much, much more.
555952
Hello Hashi,\n  OK call me crazy if you wish, BUT, all I know is if I lived in a neighborhood where everyone around me has a gun (bomb?) and one of them has been in a continual gun battle with one of my religious brothers (Palestine / Israel.) Then there's the other one that invaded my next door neighbors house to steal all his valuables (oil,political freedom,will) (US / Iraq) and to add insult to injury, he's not even from around here to begin with! Yeah call me crazy! I definitely would want my own gun. Wait a minute, they DO call me crazy!\n\nAs a side note, I think we should not be so damn cozy with Pakistan either, it appears that the Musharraf's Mob is playing serious games with us, both on the capture of bin Laden and the sale of nuclear secrets to not only Iran, but also Libya and North Korea. (see link)
27590
1. Who made 9/11 attacks:\na. Physically "Al Qaeda", practically we (US) have some blame on our selves because our middle-eastern policy is very biased towards Israel and we supported dictatorial regimes for a loooong time.\n\nb. Is it a political deceit: Yes & No. \nNo because the attacks did happen and because in 99.99% Al Qaeda was responsible. \nYes because, the US government plays the fear to launch its own geostrategic interests on the name of fighting terrorism. By the same token the British could have labeled the Boston Tea party as American terrorists.\n\n2. No one has ever the complete answer except the ones that did it. B. Laden admitted that he organized it.\n\n3. The only thing you can rely from a politician is that you can not rely on them. Some say politics is the art of the marrying the ideal with the feasible.\n\n4. Catching Saddam was much easier. Saddam does not have an international underground network.\n\n5. The Taleban where Stationary targets and did not launch a guerilla warfare. No member of Al Qaeda walks with an "Al-Qaeda member" stamp on his forehead. They blend with the local population that sometimes is supportive.\n\n6. Guerilla war is much more difficult than Desert Storm. The Iraqi army was sitting ducks. \n\n7.
71976
I believe that Bin Laden was responsible for the attacks, yes. Unfortunately, people have (a reasonable) tendency to question anything 'official' or 'government-related', so they turn to explanations involving aliens, missiles, CIA, Freemasons, and the Mossad.\n\nHere's the thing : Why the hell would a country send four airplanes to smash into their own buildings, and to kill their own people? That's just stupid.\nAnd if the government is lying, then what happened to the victims? The planes? Saying "it's a conspiracy" tells the families of the dead, and the survivors, that they died for nothing.
891702
Highly doubtful.  We are likely to keep a "garrison" there for quite some time.  We still have bases in Saudi Arabia etc.  Which btw- is one "sore point" with Osama on why he declared jihad against the US.