is a ferrari  faster than a lambagourini?
154358
Yes and no. Lambo makes two models currently, the Murcielago and the Gallardo. 0-60 times are 3.8 and 4.2 respectively. Ferrari, on the other hand has a variety of models. The F430 reaches 60 MPH in 4.0 seconds, the 612 Scaglietti in 4.1, the Superamerica in 4.2, and the Enzo in 3.4. So there are some Ferrari's that beat the Lamborghini's performance, and some that don't. But you will find both to be very, very fast.
692041
They are both within the small bunch of the FAST drivers in F1. However, Juan Pablo is more emotional and erratic like his Latin origin. KImi is more pragmatic and computer-like, a bit like his Finnish predisposition. Overall, now that for a few years they have had equal car, Kimi obtained better results consistently. Sooo, Kimi is apparently better.
70093
well the first major difference between the two is that ferrari's an italian brand and porsche's greman, ferrari's main strenght is it's speed, it is (as far as i know) the fastest street legal f1 race car, and it's strongest make is the enzo ferrari, while porsche on the other hand, has it's trade mark handling, i've seen other cars perform on a slalom course but nothing can out perform a porsche, the enzo's counterpart is the v10 carrera gt, i've seen alot of comparison tests between the two cars, and it's hard to tell which one is better than other because they both have strengths and weaknesses, if you wanna go for speed and have the money then go with a ferrari probly a 360 modena or stradale, but if you want to experience excellent handling and a bit on a low budget then go for a porsche probly a boxster or their new cayman s.
56584
Not very many. Speed = $$$$. $$$$ = low production rates. Out of the handful that do Bugatti, Mclaren F1, and Ferrari come to mind.
276445
McLaren F1 LM reached 240.14 mph stock. its in the 2005 guiness book of world records. a production car is a car that was produced and sold (had to be more than one made), for instance the mercedes clk-gtr roadster is considered a production car and only 5 were produced. some people may answer that the koenigsegg ccr which reached 242 mph on film is the fastest, but it has never been able to break the record under identical testing conditions as the mclaren so the record is not "official". the new bugatti EB 16/4 Veyron is supposed to have a top speed of 252 mph when it is realeased in a couple of years, we'll see. but for now the McLaren F1 LM holds the official record.\n\nAccording to The Koenigsegg website, here is their new model the CCX:\n\n\nPerformance \n\nAcceleration: 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) 3.2 seconds \nTop speed: 395+ km/h (245+ mph)\nStanding Quartermile: 9.9 seconds, end speed 235 km/h (146 mph)\nBraking distance: 31m (100-0 km/h)\nLateral G-force: 1.3 G\nFuel Consumption: Highway travel: 13 l / 100 km\nCombined: 17 l / 100 km
169833
to date: the Bugatti Veyron, top speed of 253mph, 1,000hp, also the most expensive\nsecond place goes to the Koenigsegg CCR\ntwo awsome cars\n**to the dude below me:   they are PRODUCTION vehicles, the guy asked for PRODUCTION vehicles, and they are not strictly "to order" only\nhis guess on the viper is correct: Viper GTS R/T - 245mph, but only a few of those were ever made
436568
It really depends on the vehicle and the driver. If you are experienced with manual transmissions, most "normal/everyday" cars are faster in manual. However, there are some high end models whose auto is faster (even driven by a novice) than the manual version driven by a professional race car driver. One example of this is the new (2007) Porsche 911 Turbo, which goes 0-60mph in 4 seconds with a manual transmission (with professional test driver) and goes 0-60mph in 3.6 seconds with the automatic transmission (in auto mode, not tiptronic).
86572
The Mclaren F1 is still the fastest production car in the world, if only by default. \n\nThe others such as the Koenigsegg and the Bugatti have not allowed their cars to actually be tested for their claimed top speeds. So the fastest PROVEN production car ever remains the Mclaren at 241MPH .\n\nOOPS>>>>I stand corrected after digging around more on the internet I found that;\n\nIn 2005 the Bugatti Veyron super sports car achieved a top speed of just over 400 km/h (248.6 miles/h) on the high speed section of the Volksvagen proving grounds at Ehra - Lessien. Thus, the Bugatti Veyron 16.4 becomes the fastest production car in the world.
118162
I like the rsx but, i've heard the Evo is one fast *** car to go against.
160841
though the carrera gt holds the record at neuremburg, where it was actually tested during development, it wont win against a mclaren f1 on a straight drag strip, it can accelerate faster though but it's top speed cant match that of the mclaren, the carrera gt may get a head start but after a few seconds the mclaren is sure to overtake the carrera gt
10903
It's definitely not better than F1 performance.  An F1 car can corner at 4G+, which is about 4 times the cornering capability of the veyron, and weighs about 1/3 as much.  The reason they don't have the same top speed is because of gearing and downforce.  An top F1 car can cost more than 10X the price of a Veyron.\n\nThe veyron is a cool piece of engineering but it is too heavy and clumsy to compete on a racetrack with an Enzo or Carrera GT, much less an F1 car.
71917
the fastest I know of would be the Bugatti Veyron 16.4.  they are handbuilt with a 1001 Euro (987 SAE) horsepower, 8.0 liter quad-turbo DOHC 64-valve W-16 engine with 7-speed auto-clutch manual transmission, and tops out at 250+ mph.  in the 7th gear, the car gets less than 3 mpg.  a second key is required to program the engine into "top-speed" mode, where you can go 0-250 in less than 60 seconds.  an air-brake is required to take the car down from 250+ to 160 mph, and the audio system alone costs US$30,000.  a deposit of 350,000 is required to place an order, for a final cost of about $1.25 million.  it will be available in the US about summer 2006, and was recently featured in the January 2006 issue of Motor Trend magazine.
802198
The simplest answer is Intel Core 2 Duo is definitely faster than Intel Core Duo.  In other words, Core Duo is the first version of Intels dual core processors(2 processors in one) and Core 2 Duo is the second version.  \n\nThe longer answer is that within the last few years, everyone has realized that core speed (such as the 3.4Ghz or 1.86Ghz you mentioned) are not the only thing that determine speed.  Think of it like this, imagine that there were two autos you were thinking of buying.  One is a huge truck with a big engine, maybe a 6 Liter engine.  The other is a small sports car with only a 3 Liter engine.  Even though the truck has the bigger engine, the sports car will actually be faster.  So if speed is what you are after (which is really the main reason to buy a processor) then you will buy the sports car.  \n\nBottom line, buy the Core 2 Duo.
189868
i would say the STI is faster...if you look at the launching of the STI, it is made for racing..it is made to be pushed..the beamers started off as looks..and if it wasn't for the BMW M3, they would not be faster..an EVO and a BMW have comparisons, but the STI is way better...let me know if u need more help
162388
the max speed is higher on the 290.  the engine is also bigger.
1054955
The cars might look alike but there is a huge difference. On speed, Indy cars are faster but this is more due to the type of track that they race on. You can go flat out better on an oval track than a track with turns and chicanes. And especially now that F1 uses V8s instead of the V10s. On an oval track you make very few gear changes while on a specially designed F1 track as more as 3,000 gear changes. On the design, F1 cars a built with a focus on aerodynamic efficiency. And each car has a specific aero specification for each circuit. The FIA have limited development on very few areas of the car. So that's were geniuses like Adrian Newey and Rory Byrne work their magic. On tracks like Monaco cars use more downforce. In F1, teams have to construct their own chassis while in IRL they are allowed to buy it. F1 is also the riches with Team Mclaren-Mercedes being the highest spender for 2005. An F1, team employs about 500 or more people for engine development, aero and etc. And in terms of popularity, F1 is reportedly the second most watched sporting event next to the World Cup.
316247
four-legged are usually faster than two-legged, so it's F1! ;) both are equally interesting to watch though.