Does anyone think that we face another terrorist attack while the Bush Administration in in office?
146146
Well we will certainly have another attack, it really does not matter who is in office.
762562
Because they want  things will go back to post 9/11. When Clinton and Bush1 were presidents(Bush2 was only in for 8 months)they were able to attack us with impunity.Blow up Embassies,attack ships,kill civilians,and ignore all civilized behavior. Lets hope they're wrong.
700597
Another attack can occur at almost anytime. No system is 100% fool proof and you can bet that the terrorists are looking and plotting a way to sneak another attack in on us. \n\nYou cant reason with terrorists and they don't understand talk. They kill woman, children and innocent people in the name of their religion, so, how can you reason with crazy people??\n\nWhile I am a democrat, I cant think of one, that could or would have handled 911 the right way. The liberal side of the party wants to talk about everything. They talked and talked in WW2 after getting evidence the Germans were exterminating Jews. They talked people all the way to the gas chambers in Auschwitz's and Treblinka.\n\nThis nation needs to pull together as one, but to do that, we need those people in Washington to do whats right for America, and not for their party. I point my finger at BOTH parties for staying the party line, and not the route that is best for this Nation.
859559
oh i agree with you there! i think he is doing the best he can being one man and having so much on his plate. the United states is having major issues especially with terrorists and wether bush was president or not, they still would have attacked us they were planning it for years and years and they hate us. i bet if a different president were in office everyone would hate him too because people love to blame someone when things go wrong but the bottom line is he is our president, the one who is fighting for us, maybe we should blame .. hmm i dont know .. the terrorists who flew planes into our buildings and killed thousands of innocent people on an ordinary tuesday morning!\noh and kia u are worried about terrorism cuz he is in office.. that is because they attacked while he was in office not because of him! the point of him not giving up the war is to keep terrorists from gaining strength again!
893104
if ur against the american administration ur a terrorist ... thats what bush said "ur either with us or with the terrorists"  ... on a more literal note though anyone in any country that resists american imperialism and globalization policies is a terrorist ... and the media tells us that these shadowy boogymen are hiding around every corner with suitcase nukes so u better submit to tyranny and give up all ur rights so "they" can protect you from an enemy that cant even be pointed out .. its ludicrous ...\n\n... yeah thats the thinking ... "the ones" ...nothing definite .. just a fear of someone somewhere out to get you ... and god forbid we question who that might be .. they will tell us who that is depending on the situation and the present agenda and who "needs some killin" at the time ...
577510
It seems that our government has failed us at every level to me... first with Clinton, as you have stated, but his failures is no excuse for the current presidency not taking further action to catch bin Laden now... I'm not even going to talk about pre-911 failures, which I think there were some by both Bush and Clinton\n\nNow that we have seen what he is capable of, we still haven't caught him... which to me is much less excusable than not catching him before we knew what he was capable of... and I think we're open to other attacks now... \n\nwe should not look to the past and pointing fingers anymore, at Bush or Clinton, but talk about what we should be doing now... which if you ask me, is focusing on Bin Laden
595577
Hindsight is 20-20, but I'm not sure. We still would have lost American lives so it seems like we would still have gone. However because of how brutal and devastating the attacks were that they hit a target and how they have permanently scared DC and NYC, those things might have had a larger effect on the decision than the acts themselves... OK, I think we would have no matter what. I believe Bush wanted to go to war and unfortunately 9-11 gave him an opportunity to do so without a fight from government or the American people.
706834
Not even Michael Brown. Notice how he is no longer in the Bush administration, soon to be followed by Rumsfeld.\n\nThis administration is a menace to America.
409526
Maybe but George bush is definite a terrorists
240159
We werent safe during the Clinton Administration when Al Queda was PLANNING 911....nor were we safe during the NUMEROUS attacks that have been defeated since.\n\nAs long as we have the money and power, we will always maintain some risk, but Al Queda is driven by a culture that NEVER EVER EVER EVER forgives...so Im convinced that now, on some level, right or wrong, we will ALWAYS have to contend with the idiocy of radical Islamists on SOME level.  I just hope people take 9-11 seriously enough to help the government do it's job with the newer security measures and even, kooky as it may sound, by reporting suspicious activities.\n\nThe people at the flight schools where Mohammed Atta trained suspected something strange, but didn't speak up.  Maybe now we can all be a little more aware of strange circumstances, if they occur in our lives.
12072
If the USA keeps making themselves a target, than yes, certainly.\n\nConsider:  Bush himself estimates 30,000 Iraqis slaughtered in his war.  That is considered a conservative estimate by most, but let's say it is true.\n\nEach of those people killed had family members:  fathers, sons, mothers, daughters - all who will grow up hating America, and wanting vengeance - wanting to create their own 9/11.\n\nThat's not even considering our other policies in the world that make people hate us.  As we speak, the Bush administration is creating the next generation of terrorists in the world.\n\nI hope I am wrong.  But it seems like terrorism in the world will only increase, and the "war on terror" will never end.
47360
Probably not (and no, that was not a stab at President Bush himself).  Many American's probably couldn't even name the president 30 years ago, let alone any individual act that he did -- and contrary to popular belief the world was just as harrowing back then as it was now.  So unless something truly dramatic happens (mankind reaches Mars during his term, for example), he'll just go down as just another American President.  And if you think 9/11 alone was significant enough to mark his place in history, how many of your can name the president during Pearl Harbor, an equally shocking event? (You'd be surprised how many people couldn't).
91069
No way. It was Bush's way of diverting the american public's attention from more important issues, PLUS, it was a great way for him to make some extra money. \n\nTerrorism is a threat only if you let it be. Wake up, it's all make-believe.
429691
Let's think about this a little bit...how long do you think that it would have taken anyone to plan out an attack like that. Think about how many people would have to be involved. I don't think that Bush could have done it in the amount of time that he was president. If you want to believe it was our own government that was involved I would have to start looking at the Clinton administration or administrations preceding that. That doesn't seem to work!\n\nCome on people! There are terrorists out there that want us dead. Why is that so hard to understand. Oh yeah and for those people that sit there and accuse Bush for 9/11 and then sit there and talk about how stupid he is, I think that you need to pick one...because those two ideas do not work together!
776718
Amen brother preach on. They will come and it is going to be beyond belief. Most likely we will be facing a biological or nuclear disaster that will be the worst attack on American soil. You are very right the libs have sided with the terrorists but that will not save them once they are here.\n\nThey just don't get it do they?
1024143
In the past we would be attacked (i.e. 1st World Trade Center attack, Marine barracks in Beirut, Blackhawk downing in Somalia, Embassy attacks, etc.) and our response has been little to non-existent. On 911 we were attacked and this President has done something. It was a very tough decision but he made it. The path has become rough, many who supported him have changed their minds and no longer support him, but he has stayed the course. I do believe both the president and the troops deserve my support. They are doing what has not been done for a long time. Fighting the enemy, if you believe we should have gone to war with Iraq or not Al Queda is in Iraq today, and our men and women are fighting them. Al Queda attacked the USA and I agree with the president that we should hunt them down, wherever they may be.
735261
Not yet. There has been a build-up of terrorists and weapons in Mexico for more than a year. The U.S. has done nothing to stop it. seems some people want an attack to happen between now and the 2008 elections.