Why does Tiger Woods pwn soo much?
140905
If you are asking why he OWNS so much, the answer is he was born with some talent and he spent his entire younger life being pushed by his father with a singleminded purpose to excel at golf. So today, he has fame and wealth, but at what cost? Try to think of what he had to sacrifice while growing up such as friends, spontaneous activities, and just hanging out. There is always a balance between what you have and what you gave up to get it. Each person has to come to grips with whether or not they made the right choice. \n\nOne the other hand, if you are wondering why he has so much and you perhaps don't, or if you think it is not fair for one person to own so much while others don't, that is the wonderful part of living in America, the greatest nation on earth since the beginning of time. Every single person has the ability to choose, but most squander those choices. I hope you will think deeply about the answers and perhaps craft some new purpose of focus in your own life as a result. Best of luck.\nThe Answer Man
519506
Go to the site below and sign up for Tiger's fan club. Personally, I find a whole loads of golf tips that even better than any of the golf books, or golf lesson. The problem is there are too many to finish it. By the way, it filled with video clips.
302621
SHUT-UP GUYS..\nA TIGER NEVER EVEN DREAM TO OPPOSE 'THE LION'.
565915
I think it will not affect your game too much because the most important thing is your technique. For example, even if you give a 'rubbish ball' to Tiger Woods, he can still play under 70 strokes. Anyway the most important thing is your technique and not the ball.
504760
Maybe because he spends to much time.
1029555
Because its involve lots of money. I was just walking in the sport section of a department store yesterday and came to realise that a box of golf balls (12) of any kinds is more expensive than a football (soccer). In golf, you can loose a box in a round of golf (i.e. hitting into the waters, jungles, off the mountains and all sorts of hazards and lost it). And that is only for one player. Think about it, a soccer ball is played again and again by two teams of a total of 22 players.\n\nGolf's is also called a gentleman game because nobody fight over the ball, as each one has his own, unlike soccer and definitely not very violent like American football, where loads of people hitting each other for one ball!!!!\n\nPlsme. I can think of other kind of more expensive sports though; like horse back polo, where each player must have five expensive horses (may cost each 100,000 USD), and sailing yarcht (how about 10 million USD), Ballons, speed boats, sports cars (formular 1)..
833457
A LOT!!!  "As for Woods, his income in 2005 was pegged at more than $86 million - just under $12 million on the course, and $75 million off the course."
784233
I have.He is the best in the game and will be the best ever.He has the best head in the game.I have never seen anyone pull off some of the most pressure shots in golf and he is just getting to the age in golf thats is supposed to be the prime age.I can`t imagine he will reliquish his  top spot in golf for many many years.
6859
Heck no, Tiger is raking in the money. He'll never retire as long as he has a chance to beat Jack Nicklaus's record for winning major championships. He also has a good shot at winning the most tournaments all time, which is currently held by I think Sam Snead at around 80. \n\nTiger wants to be the greatest ever, so he won't retire until he's exhausted all his skills to achieve that goal.
1026874
They do not play golf like Tiger does
314796
He is the 4th best player in the world, so yeah he is a multi millionare.\n\nFederer, Nadal, Lubicic, Roddick, Nalbandian, etc are all rich.  \n\nwww.atptennis.com\n\nYou can see their earnings on the above site.  This does not include appearance fees or coporate sponsor fees like nike, etc.
1153290
Andy's game is based on pure power. He hits the crap out of the ball. His "lack of game" could be attributed to several things.\n\n1) His style of play is very one-dimensional. He'll always have a hard time beating players that out-think him (see: Federer in every Wimbledon match they've played in). A lot of players have figured out how to keep in the points despite his power. \n\n2) His biggest weapon is his serve. However, he often seems more interested in breaking new speed records than placing his serves out of the reach of his opponent.\n\n3) Coaching carousel. The fact that he's gone through so many different coaches makes me think that he's blaming a lot of these coaches rather than looking at himself. He was at his best when he was with Brad Gilbert, but he probably felt that Gilbert was trying to change his game too much. I can understand that, but he needs to realize that his game isn't perfect and he needs to be able to adapt...a la Andre Agassi.\n\n4) Mental aspect. What a lot of people don't realize is how much a professional player needs confidence and how much tennis is a mental game. If a player has any doubt in their mind about being able to make a shot, then they'll probably miss it (if you're a skiier, think about the last time you were on the slopes and you started to say to yourself, "OH CRAP! I'm going to biff it!" and then you promptly wiped out. It's the same thing for tennis). And once a player starts doubting himself, his game loses the edge that makes him so tough. Roger Federer is so good because of this aspect. Ever since he turned pro in 1998, he's had the same tools, but it was when he learned to be confident in his game that he turned the corner and became so dominant. Andy needs to regain his confidence.\n\nBut don't worry. Andy should do well this Wimbledon and carry some momentum into the hard court season.\n\nI hope that helped.
917504
YEP...! - you beat me to it...! I was just about to ask that too...\n\nIt's obvious he's one of those players with a ritual of irriatating little things he MUST do every time he lines-up to send OR receive a serve, lots of pro sports-stars are superstitious like that - OR else they deliberately try to unsettle an opponent by messing about. Mary Pierce is another one... But hey...! - sometime it works... and players like that are really cheats and should be punished...!\n\nBut this bum-picking thing of Nadal sure beats me...! I reckon a best friend (or three...!) should tell him that people are beginning to talk...!  Even his best fans...!!
463025
Wilt, come on now 20,000, even if half of it is true.\n\n\nok ok, I am not sure if any one was as dominant as he was in his sport.  they changed rules for him.  other than that I would say Sorenstrom, she is more dominant in LPGA than Tiger is in the PGA
494851
Yeah, that's part of the design of the irons, supposed to make them more forgiving. See here for info:\n\nhttp://www.golfdigest.com/hotlist
1052264
Several reasons. One, they don't like each other.  It all started a few years back when Tiger went to Nike and then went into a slump. Phil said one of the reasons was that Tiger was playing with inferior equipment to which Tiger responded angrily. Tiger has since wanted to beat him every time out.  They were also paired together during the last ryder cup and never spoke to one another. Tough to do when you are playing as teams. Tiger constantly made faces whenever Phil would hit a bad shot. Tiger simply doesn't like to lose. Now with them trading number one back and forth, the rivalry has heated up.
835195
fast but a poor golfer