Who has the liability of a criminal assault by a board member of an Association?
148607
Seems to me that  the board member who committed the assault would be responsible.
619248
1 count of assualt with intent per offender. first degree misemaender
169583
Typically most state dram shop acts provide for liability only if the person served was "visibly intoxicated" when served.  Under that standard, probably.
1028781
Yes he could be charged.  Everyone could have just walked away, so self-defense is not an issue.  Why did the guy faint after being slapped was he old?
194270
That fact that you mention disputes between residents makes me think you are referring to a homeowner's association.  You are probably referring to the "executive session" of the Board of Directors.\n\nMeeting laws on private associations vary by state.  In most jurisdictions, the board of directors can adjourn to a private meeting to discuss personnel issues, litigation, contrat negotiations and members discipline.  This is not necessarily a complete list of topis because the laws of your state may be different.
630422
call your local police dept. they can tell you the statutes on that.
82305
The funny thing is that there could be two types of trespassers at Augusta.  There isa criminal and a civil definition.\n\n  If you do not have the right to be on the ground of this property, you may have committed the criminal act of going into somebody else's land or property without permission of the owner or lessee, a criminal act in Georgia, which if it is your first offense, could receive a fine of up to 1000 dollars under current state law (judges decision), unless there are aggravating factors.   Aggravating factors involved with your trespass such as assault, theft, etc, could make it worse.\n\nThe interesting part of this is that the golfers could actually committ trespassing as well, but are punishable only under the civil definition of trespassing.  Hitting a ball into the yard of a person whose property abutts a gold course could give grounds for a tort that may be a valid cause of action to seek judicial relief and possibly damages through a lawsuit, don't laugh there is precedent.
69608
Are you asking about whose more guilty, the person who breaks into the house or the person who pays for the burgler's kit?  In modern American jurisprudential thought, both are EQUALLY liable for any damages, assuming theire is reason to believe the person 'paying' was 'reasonably aware' that the funds were going to be used illegally.
63414
http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/C600-699/6200001039.HTM
1051698
The laws vary from state to state.  I would check with your local district attorney's office as to your options.
839303
Could be a felony, depends on the extent of the injury.
191501
depends on if a weapon was involved. If you hit your spouse with an open/empty hand it's ussually considered simple assault, which in most jurisdictions is a misdemeanor with a fine involved. If you use any sort of object then it's aggrevated assault and it's a felony. Also if you live in a jurisdiction with a three-strikes law, even your third simple assault charge can be judicated as a felony.
926015
That's very broad, and the laws really vary from state to state.  But generally speaking, at least in many areas, the owner of a bar is liable of they "knowingly" serve alcohol to someone who is "obviously/visibly intoxicated" and that person proceeds to injure someone.  The difficulty is proving the bartender should have known this guy was so intoxicated; it hinges a lot upon eye witnesses and other factors such as BAL.  Many plaintiff attorneys will argue that if the BAL was X%, then he must have been obviously intoxicated.  Expert testimony is also often a huge part of a trial.  Ex: If this person was plasterd, wobblin around and they served him another drink and then this person subsequently left the bar and on his way home swerved and killed someone, the estate or family of the deceased could sue the bar, if they could prove the above facts.\n\nThat's the general shtick.  I could go into much more, but hope this get's what you're looking for.
598565
You can sue them for violating their contract in order to force them to follow the bylaws, but you would need to prove that there was damage and what exactly it was (not necesarily in a quantity of money) in order to receive any payment.
8809
"Simple assault" is defined under the Model Penal Code: "A person is guilty of assault if he: (a) attempts to cause or purposely, knowingly or recklessly causes bodily injury to another; or (b) negligently causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon; or (c) attempts by physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily injury."\n\nI'm unfamiliar with the term "criminal restraint."  Perhaps it refers to the form of assault committed, that the defendant used bodily assaultive force to restrain an individual?  Your question is unclear.\n\nRegardless, the offense of simply assault usually requires a court appearance, since it is usually an offense greater than a mere payable misdemeanor.  The defendant would have to contact the court in the jurisdiction where the incident took place for specific information.
1100954
I am the treasurer of a homeowner's association.  I can not tell by your posting if you have violated the By-Laws or other homeowner's association covenant.  If you have and that is the reason they are going after you, then you will most likely lose.\n\nUsually an association does not go after a member unless it has cause.  Additionally, the association can not go after you unless the board of directors authorize it.  So, apparently they also believe they have a just cause.\n\nYou would probably be better off making peace and try to settle without going to small claims court.  My association has not lost a case yet.  The By-Laws are "air tight."
968577
1st degree assault & battery