Every body is talking abt India and Pakistan tour of  Bush tour but US is only interested in India only, WHY?
147633
These two countries don't like each other and India has a more favorable attitude towards America. The "Cold War" conditions set in long ago also allow India to help us out with China.\n\nChina is a real sleeping giant and it's best for us the keep an eye on them.
951384
Hey,Fcukers. Pakistan already fought four wars with India who is 10 times stonger than pakistan so the thing is India will not be able to destroy us.pakistan also have nukes.I say that it will be the dooms day when pakistan will be destroyed with the rest of the world.
678163
well fo sure ........nobody knows. but the most likely reason can be to gain international respect vis-a-vis united states as it happened in the case of india . also to have a dominating position in the midle east given its complex geopolitical situation and also have an upper hand with respect to israel. dont forget israel also has nuclear weapons but nobody is concerned about that.........
443708
When President Bush says "We have no territorial ambitions; we don’t seek an empire," he is telling half a truth. Certainly the United States isn’t looking to make Iraq the 51st state. But that’s not the way of empire today -- it’s about control, not about territory!\nThe key is not who owns the oil but who controls the flow of oil and oil profits!!Until this is done he will not pull anyone out!! Bush wants control of the oil and that is his bottom line!!The ultimate goal is not Iraq--that bombed, blockaded state partially controlled by a witless thug whom the gang once succored--but domination of the world's oil supplies in the coming century, when the surging nations of China and India will reach their economic peak. These vast entities could eventually tilt the imbalance of world wealth away from the Anglo-American elites who have for so long held the high and palmy ground of privilege. But the voracious economies of the Asian behemoths will require unstinting draughts of the oil reserves now locked under the sands of Iraq and Saudi Arabia. There is oil elsewhere, yes--but nowhere else in the world are there reserves deep enough to satisfy the thirsts of China and India as they come into their own.
194618
Bush says the India and Pakistan    have different history and different needs. Still people keep on comparing both.
191222
There is no way to get corruption out of India. India is a huge country and it has to many people to keep corruption out of the government. How the hell is it Bush's fault?
87080
bush vist india n pakistan for its own purpose not to solve kashmir problem. yae south asian could do progess if kashmir problem  solved
933589
USA has never changed its foreign policy towards India and Israel with change of guard in the White House. In 2008 also, when the country will have a Democratic candidate as the US President, nothing much is expected in Pakistan. As rightly pointed by some one, Pakistan is being used and had been used by UK and USA to keep India engaged and busy so that its potentiality of becoming another super power does not become a reality. With democratic government installed in Pakistan, it will be inconvenient to dictate. Individuals can be commanded and not leaders. President Ayub Khan, Yahya Khan, Tikka Khan, and Musharraf are individual Army generals and not peoples leaders.\n\nMusharraf will continue in power so long as the people of Pakistan do not shed blood to earn democracy. No pain no gain.
612443
coz it is part of USA
167057
Bush isn't selling the ports ... they already belong to a British company that is selling them to a company from the UAE.\n\nAnd US always has and will continue to be responsible for security at the ports, regardless of what company owns them
1074463
ITS BECAUSE THE UNITED STATES HAS NOW UNDERSTOOD THAT THE FUTURE BELONGS TO INDIA AND CHINA . THE GROWTH STATISTICS OF INDIA CLEARLY SHOWS THAT ITS ALL SET TO OVERTAKE USA BY 2050 . SO INORDER TO KEEP CHINA UNDER CONTROL U.S NEEDS THE HELP OF INDIA . ALSO NOW THE U.S CANNOT AVOID INDIA . THEY ARE ALREADY IN A VERY GOOD POSITION WITH INDIA'S ECONOMY VERY STRONG AND CRUISING AHEAD FASTER THAN EVER . ALSO INDIA HAS BECOME THE CENTRE FOR MANY INNOVATIONS BECAUSE OF THE HIGHLY SKILLED WORK FORCE AVILABLE IN INDIA .\nINDIA ALSO IS A EMERGING AS A STRONG MILITARY POWER WITH ITS 4 TH LARGEST AIRFORCE . 6TH LARGEST NAVY AND 2ND LARGEST ARMY . \n\nINSHORT NOW IT WILL BE FOOLISH IF U.S DOES NOT STAND WITH INDIA .INDIA CAN BE A RELIABLE PARTENER IN U.S WAR AGAINST TERROR .\n\nALSO INDIA ALTHOUGH NOT SIGNED NPT , HAS A VERY GOOD RECORD OF NON PROLIFERATION NUCLEAR TECH. THAT THOSE WHO HAVE SIGNED NPT.\n\nBECAUSE OF ALL THESE REASONS U.S WANTS INDIA WITH IT FROM NOW.
99234
US has bought India's loyalty long ago when it allowed the country to build its nuclear arsenal.\n\nSo, India's going to betray a long-term economic and political ally (Iran). \n\nFrom this point of view various people can debate, loyalty vs opportunism. \nOn the other hand, India's position suggests lack of intelligence since it has taken such a position without having received any evidence that Iran is conducting a military nuclear programme (not to mention that even if it's the case, then Iran's nukes would support India).
383032
The Bin Laden family and the Bush family do have business ties... does that mean that Bush knows or has ever known osama... I don't know? But, I do find it interesting that he never talks about Bin Laden anymore and we didn't catch him, and it's just like we gave up or don't care? He killed 2,000 people on U.S. soil, what the Hell? Everyone says he's in Pakistan and Bush want's the Pakistanis to take care of it... They are doing a great job obviously.  Meanwhile, we invade a country that "MAY" attack us one day with "WMD" that they didn't even have? Let's worry about the guys that attacked us first, then worry about the guys that "MAY" attack us. \nAnd does anyone actually beleive that if we wanted to catch him and made a concerted effort that we couldn't?
1122237
America is at one of it's lowest in popularity (next maybe to that maid with open legs of a country supposedly governed by blair), you'd have to do a lot to improve on the Public opinion of your country in the eyes of the world as well as the Americans themselves.\nAlso, just stop the bush from putting his foot in the mouth everytime he open it.\nst
1187397
Same old answer - America seeks to dictate world policy instead of lead.  The stance is always all countries should support americas wars, policies and desires because it is in Americas interest.    Much of the time it is in the worlds interest but Bush simply does not seem to be able to articulate this.\n\nAs Americas influence continues to wain and China and Russia continue to prosper they are learning how to discuss and debate with other countries and are respected for it.  They will therefore grow to have more and more influence as America loses it's influence.\n\nSo yes - maybe Bush is leading america into the boondocks.\n\nAmericas economy is forecast to take another dive shortly and the American leadership needs to start talking to other countries on an equal footing.\n\nIran and Korea are another matter entirely.  Could you contemplate either country getting a nuke and not using it?  That really is a world problem that America/Bush needs to talk to other countries and learn leadership rather than trying to dictate or it could turn nuclear.
560732
I don't know if I would call India's support of the US "excessive".  We do seem to have alot of national interests and goals in common, so supporting each other would only increase our chances of success.\n\nBesides, Indian women are hot :)
260096
LOL! And you're asking Americans! Seek Indians in India, American's won't be nice about this!