How did Hermes protein get it's name.?
153986
I don't know what the Hermes protein is or how it got it's name, but i know that Hermes was a Greek god, and he used to deliver messages to all the other gods. (the one with wings on his shoes) Hope it helps! :)
785808
usually protein with some metallic ions
152296
Phytagoras HIMSELF! the man!\n\nI think he did it while trying to find a scientific explanation on why did theif folks gave him that name.
421534
1)Karl Stetter (born 1941), German microbiologist .\n2)Luc Montagnier (born 1932), French discoverer of HIV \n3)Robert May (born 1936), biologist, physisist, mathematician, President of Royal Society of London 2000-2005 \n4)Sydney Brenner (born 1927), British molecular biologist, winner of the 2002 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine\n5)Günter Blobel (born 1936), German Nobel Prize-winning biologist who discovered that newly synthesized proteins contain "address tags" which direct them to the proper location within the cell. \n\n*Famous European biologists in the past*\n1)Robert Bárány (1876-1936), Austrian physician, received the 1914 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his research on the vestibular system \n2)Jules Bordet (1870-1961), Belgian immunologist and microbiologist, winner of the 1919 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his discovery of the complement system in the immune system \n3)Alexis Carrel (1873-1944), French biologist and surgeon, winner of the 1912 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his work on sutures and organ transplants, advocate of eugenics
65787
Olny srmat poelpe can read thsi I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! if you can raed tihs psas it on !! i can raed it, waht aubot you??\n\nI just found that on my facebook wall yesterday, so I thought it was weird when I saw your question. When I looked it up, I couldn't really find a name for it. The post said the research originated at Cambridge University in England, but the link below says it came from Saberi and Perrott, two researchers in California. I wouldn't trust either source without more info to back it up.
1005721
Perhaps the most famous of these experiments is called the Miller-Urey experiment. Using water, methane, ammonia, and hydrogen to simulate primordial earth, and a little electrical coaxing, Miller managed to form 13 of the 21 amino acids organisms use to build proteins, and nucleic acids, mostly in the form of adenine.\n\nThere are some caveats, whether this is actually the composition of the primordial soup has been called into question, and the presence of some molecules, oxygen for example, ceased all biological molecules from forming. We really don't know what the environment was, but the important thing to take away from the experiment is that it's absolutely possible for organic molecules to spring from a random collection of chemicals.\n\nOpponents of evolution like to use the idea of a typewriter factory exploding and forming a dictionary as an allegory for spontaneous creation of a cell. For a fully formed cell to be produced spontaneously certainly is impossible, one of the leading hypothosises is that, as with everything else in evolution, it started in steps, the explosion at the typewriter factory didn't for a dictionary, it formed a word. The first form of life was probably little else than some RNA molecule that managed to replicate, more advanced structures took more time to develop. Interestingly enough, it's now thought that mitochondria were an ancient bacteria that formed a symbiotic relationship with larger cells, a relationship that was so successful, all future life was based on it, this is why they still retain their own genetic information.
52882
Presumably you know that the primary structure of a protein is simply a chain of amino acids.  The secondary and tertiary structures form as the result of various intermolecular forces pulling different amino acids in that chain together.  Hydrogen bonding is one of the intermolecular forces that act on the amino acids in the chain and cause them to fold up. Think of it this way: if you started with a long strip of paper (representing the primary structure of the protein), and then stapled it together in a bunch of places to make a complicated three-dimentional structure, the hydrogen bonds would be like the staples (or some of them), holding the linear chain of amino acids in a three-dimentional shape.
1089185
It's supposed to be argon, but the way it got abbreviated when you posted it, it doesn't go up to r, so it's much harder to answer.  I had to look at the title bar to see the whole thing.
275559
UPDATE: I've just read your comment so I'm leaving the difficult stuff below. \nFirst things first:\nProbably you know (but it's worth repeating) that the genetic information in each cell is kept as DNA. This DNA is able to copy parts of itself as RNA. RNA in turn builds proteins. Our bodies are not made only of proteins, but proteins are the ultimate regulators of what our body looks like and how it works. So, if a gene in your DNA synthesizes a specific RNA, and this in turn can make a particular protein, this protein will have to do with the way you look and function. Another person with a somewhat different "variety" of the same gene, will have a different appearance and/or function. Each gene codes for one protein, so it takes a really large amount of genes to code for all of them (and this is VERY simplified, the interactions are much more complex).\n\nNow for the second part: the fact that you have several really long DNA strands in each cell (these DNA strands are what can be visualized as chromosomes under special circumstances) does not mean that every single little gene in your DNA will generate RNA and ultimately produce a protein. Only a part of the DNA is actually active (and it's a small proportion), the rest is just "there" and doesn't code. And the expression of the gene (=when the gene's information becomes visible) depends on the interaction with other genes, with other substances that are cellular regulators, and many environmental factors. \n\nExample: you know Siamese cats? they have a genetic constitution such that the dark color proteins are formed especially at the body parts that are colder. So usually you get a sand-colored cat with black legs, tail, and ears. But for this pattern to show, there has to be interaction with the right temperatures. If the cat is not exposed to these colder temperatures, the dark parts don't develop. Or maybe other proteins or regulators "got in the way" of the process. And you get a cat with no dark parts (or the opposite, a very dark animal from excess cold). \nAnother example: suppose a baby is born from tall parents; they in turn had tall parents, so it's highly probable that the baby has the "tall" potential. But if this baby is not well nourished during his/her development, he/she will not reach the height that he "potentially should" have had. \nCan you see the difference? The genotype is ALL the genetic information that you have, and the phenotype is the result of the combination of this genetic information with other factors: the person/animal/plant as it is realized. \nI hope this helps you, I'll be around :-)\n\nCheck this site, it's great:\nhttp://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/evo101/IIIA1Genotypevsphenotype.shtml\n-------------------------------\nThe genotype is the genetic information that the said individual carries in each of his/her body cells. Much of that information is never expressed (=becomes "visible" or translates into actual characteristics), and much genetic information can yield different characteristics depending on the interaction with many environmental factors (which occur both inside and outside the cell or organism in question). Thus, the final fully developed individual is the result of the genotype ("raw" genetic information) PLUS environmental/developmental factors; the characteristics of this final product, the real individual, constitute the Phenotype. \nFor instance, an individual with a perfectly "normal" genotype may develop many types of abnormalities due to problems during pregnancy, including drugs, lack of oxygen, etc. Identical twins have the same genotype (they come from a single cell) but are never completely identical; and of course they have different personalities. This is because of all the epigenetic phenomena that influence development. And it's also the reason why reductionist approaches that s
924396
It is very simple. Last band gives you that answer. You need to see G=G bond and it is follow by TAG. It is definatly eukaryotic.
426666
Helium - From the Greek word "helios" meaning "sun"\n\nNeon - From the Greek word "neon" meaning "new"\n\nArgon - From the Greek word "argos" meaning "inactive"\n\nKrypton - From the Greek word "kryptos" meaning "hidden"\n\nXenon - From the Greek word "xenos" meaning "stranger"\n\nRadon - Named after "the element radium" (radon was called niton at first, from the Latin word "nitens" meaning "shining"
597566
The Hershey-Chase experiment was a series of experiments conducted in 1952 by Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase that identified DNA to be the genetic material of phages and, ultimately, of all organisms. A phage is a small virus that infects bacteria. It consists of a protein coat that encloses the genetic material. When a phage infects a bacterium, it inserts its genetic material into the bacterium, while its coat remains outside.\n\n \nStructural overview of T2 phageIn a first experiment, T2 phages with radioactive 32P-labeled DNA infected bacteria. In a second experiment, T2 phages with radioactive 35S-labeled protein infected bacteria. In both experiments, bacteria were separated from the phage coats by blending followed by centrifugation. In the first experiment, most radioactivity was found in the infected bacteria, while in the second experiment most radioactivity was found in the phage coat. These experiments demonstrated that DNA is the genetic material of phage and that protein does not transmit genetic information.\n\nHershey shared the 1969 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his “discoveries concerning the genetic structure of viruses”\n\nis this wat u meAN?
1150737
it has beeen therorized that the sigle cell was born from primitive proteins that comingled together in a primordial ooze of amino acids and that is how life was thought to be formed on our planet so many years ago
853939
Go through this:\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/protein_bio...\nor http://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/to...\nor\nhttp://www.kids.net.au/encyclopedia-wiki...\n\nyou will get whatever you want.
271339
Concerning Amino Acid Sequences, some biologists believe that the differences in protein structure represent functional differences while others think that they occur at random because of random mutations and represent the passage of time.  The "random-tick" hypothesis states that they can be used to determine when a particular group branched off (molecular clocks).
309813
ClOC-(CH2)10-COCl + H2N-CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2-NH2 -------->\nadipoyl chloride         +    hexamethylene diamine\nH2N-(CH2)6-NH(O)C-(CH2)10-CO-NH-(CH2)6-NH(O)C-(CH2)...etc\n\nDifficult to do without drawing, but adipoyl chloride is the acid chloride shown, and hexamethylene diamine is the diamine drawn, the second molecule.  \n\nThe amine has two nucleophilic centres, and the acid chloride, two elextrophilic centres.  These react together to form a long polymeric chain of many repeating units.  There are many forms of Nylon, which are made in the same way using molecules of different chain lengths.  FOr example the first form of Nylon was Nylon 6,6 - made from the same amine as yours, but from an acid chloride containing 4 less methylene (CH2) spacers.  The bonds joining the two molecules together are AMIDE or PEPTIDE bonds.  These are the same bonds which join amino acids together to make proteins, which are formed from DNA.\n\nI hope this helps.
722185
From this patent\n\nwww.freepatentsonline.com/6962719.html\n\n\n\nThe total extract described in EXAMPLE 1 was loaded in a dialysis bag with molecular weight cut off 500 (Spectra/Por®, Cat. No. 131 057). Both ends of the bag were sealed with clamps. The bag was placed in a bucket contained deionized water, in which the ratio of the supernatant and deionized water was 1:10. The total extract was dialyzed at 4° C. with stirring thrice each for 20 hours. The solution remaining in dialysis bag was collected and concentrated under reduced pressure to give the extract.