where can i find the real film of earth that captured from the moon?
151685
not sure of web site but think it's http://www.hubble.com,or you can try NASA's web site,either should might be of use/help.
69261
There are five retro-reflectors on the moon. The first web site shows their location on the moon. The second give more exact coordinates.
823638
Although my wife's father performed fuel calculations for the original Apollo landing, I'll spare you that speech. Instead, I will encourage you to watch two programs. The first show is called Conspiracy Moon Landing that it currently showing on the National Geographic Channel and it pretty much obliterates all of the popular conspiracy theories.\n\nI would also encourage you to watch a movie called Capricorn One. Made it 1978, it is a fictional story about a fake mission to Mars. Although it is a science fiction story, it is a good example of how utterly impossible it would be to fake a moon landing for any length of time.\n\n12 men walked on the moon from 1969 to 1972 and we have neither the resources nor the technology to pull off that big of a hoax for so long. Hundreds of thousands of people have worked on the space program. It would be far easier to put someone on the moon than to try and fake it and keep it secret for nearly 40 years. \n\nThe landings came at a time when our space program was ultra competitive with the former Soviet Union. Remember how big of a deal it was when Sputnik was put into orbit? They had the technology to monitor our moon shots and transmissions. Don't you think they would have called us out if they had evidence that it was all fake? \n\nPerhaps the most definitive proof of our trip to the moon is what we left behind. For the last 35+ years, scientists have been beaming lasers to the moon and measuring the return times. How are they doing this? The beams are reflected back by equipment left on the moon on at 3 different locations.\n\nCase closed.
488362
They didn't stage it. \n\n> If it was not fake then where are the real tapes. why are > they missing. \n\nWhat "tapes" are these? film, video and data are freely available from NASA.\n\n> wht Buzz aldrin is not ready to give interviews. \n\nBuzz gives interviews all the time. Buzz even punched that gasbag Bart Siebrel!\n\n> And how did the video shows lift off from the moon when no > body stayed there to shoot it. \n\nRobotic camera.\n\n> HOw did flag waved? \n\nThe flag wasn't "waving" in a wind It had ripples in it from the moment it was unfurled, and with no wind to change that, they stayed static.\n\n> how they communicated via vaccumm. dose satellite \n> transmits signals in vaccuum. \n\nYes, satellites transmit signals in vacuum. And so do remote landing craft on the moon directly back to earth. And so do incredibly remote robotic spacecraft that are now beyond the edge of our solar system. And on mars. And orbiting Saturn. And on the way to Pluto. AND being "transmitted" at earth from interstellar radio sources like stars. Electromagnetic signals do not need a medium to be transmitted-they are their own medium. \n\nanswer all this and i belive that NASA did landed.
1017971
I know it's a hoax because they filmed it in my backyard.  My parents had a place that had craters and a lot of white cheese and NASA asked us if they could use it for the astronaut's training...we agreed and then we found out that the astronauts were falling in the craters and putting flags in them and eating the cheese and saying they were on the moon.  We had to move away due to the embarrasment to our family and we were in hiding for many years.  It's only now I can tell you this because it's been over 30 yrs but if you don't hear from me anymore, it will be because NASA came back.  To verify my story, just ask Al Gore..he made global warming with a big window fan and now he is trying to blow it everywhere.
178177
Google has programs that do that for the earth and the moon but you will have to download some software to do it right and your computer will have to be fast, check it out.
500831
http://www.almanac.com/astronomy/moon/index.php\n\nits waxing
199666
I don't know where to get that replica from, but if you can capture some shots that show it really well you can go to a jewellery maker and have them make it exactly like the one on the movie for you.
601546
Well there is no "Live" Satalite picture on the internet which is free available. \n\nthis is free but you wont like it:\nhttp://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/uncgi/Earth?imgsize=320&opt=-z&lat=37.8571&ns=North&lon=334.094&ew=West&alt=13&img=learth.evif
447561
Here is it\n\nhttp://earth.google.com/downloads.html
270641
Google Earth.  Download it here: http://earth.google.com/
355609
http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/Academy/UNIVERSE/MOON.HTML\nhttp://seds.lpl.arizona.edu/nineplanets/nineplanets/luna.html\nhttp://www.solarviews.com/eng/moon.htm\nhttp://home.hiwaay.net/~krcool/Astro/moon/
203410
Hi. This is a good question...sort of.  Unless you have a little bit of experience with photography, you might not understand lighting and shutter speed selection.  Sunlight reflecting off the lunar surface and nearby objects is much more intense than starlight. If you think about taking a picture at night here on earth you have to adjust the shutter speed for what you are  imaging.  If you have a camera that does this automatically, it will likely select the object closest to the center of the frame and adjust the shutter speed for that object.  If you want to get star images you'll have to mount your camera on a tripod and let the shutter remain open longer. If the astronauts did this, the objects in the foreground would be extremely overexposed and wash out the entire image.  If you are asking this to determine whether the Moon Landing was a hoax, you'll need a much better question.  See the source below for a better explanation and for answers to more of the ridiculous claims that Hoax supporters have made. To learn more about astrophotography see the second link.
324293
I wonder how many people out there are too lazy to do some real research and read the scientific facts proving that man has landed on and partially explored the Moon. Here's a good place to start: http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html  On this website each and every "fact" claiming that the Moon landings were all faked are ripped to shreds.\n\nMy favorite "fact" is about the 'waving' flag on the airless Moon. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand how the flag can be made to appear to be waving. Duh!\n\nNobody from the Faked Moon Landing bunch has ever answered my question about several hundred pounds of rock and soil brought back that research groups AROUND THE WORLD unanimously agreed was non-terrestrial.\n\nGod should be spelled B-I-G B-A-N-G\nPBrax@netscape.com
238713
Men landed on moon during the times of space age race between Russia and USA. If it were a fraud, Russia would have been on top of it to bring it up. So, I guess it was confirmed that man really did land on moon and got rock samples back to earth. So i think it really happened. It can't be fraud. Ofcourse there is this talk about pictures taken by astronauts in moon that looks fake and all...but there are equally positive proofs of video and pictures taken on moon too. If you ask me, i think it is real.
21709
The link below is to a moonbow in epod (earth picture of the day).\n\nEnjoy!
93570
google earth, download and install this software and you will be able to watch the entire earth. :P