how much wood would a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood?
144414
Did you happen to look underneath your question as you were writing it, and see that four thousand people have asked that question already? You are by far the best though, mr original. thanks for the 2 points.
1176662
if a woodchuck were anything like chuck norris, it wouldnt need to chuck wood.  The wood would chuck itself off the trees, in fear of being roundhouse kicked to little splinters.
611407
as much wood a woodchuck WOULD chuck if a woodchuck COULD chuck wood
676426
A woodchuck could chuck all the wood if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
1151612
A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.......but....How much ground could a groundhog hog if a groundhog could hog ground.....\n\nA groundhog would hog all the ground he could hog if a groundhog could hog ground
528750
no where near as much wood as you could you could chuck
303288
I've already answered this question, so i'll just recycle my answer:\n\nWell, lets take a look at that, shall we. One would assume that the Woodchuck in question (which we will call Woodchuck A for the purpose of sounding scientific) would chuck as much wood as it could chuck, if it could indeed chuck wood.\n\nBut since there is no way to truly determine how much wood a woodchuck would chuck, then the only way to answer this question would be through comparison. How much wood would Woodchuck A chuck when compared to woodchucks’ B, C, and D? One would then have to take a few variables into account, Such as: \n\n1) How much body mass does our woodchuck have? A small woodchuck would chuck considerably less than an abnormally large woodchuck.\n\n2) How crazy about chucking wood is our woodchuck? And,\n\n3) What exactly is a ‘Woodchuck’? \n\nWebster calls this a "grizzled, thickset marmot," which leads me to my final question, \n\n4) What exactly is a ‘Marmot’?\n\nBut considering the fact that I don’t care, we’ll continue on;\n\nNow lets assume that Woodchuck B is dead, Woodchuck C has a headache and doesn’t feel too up to ‘chucking’ tonight, and finally, Woodchuck D we’ll say is a half-retarded, sub mutation born of an o-zoneless habitat. \n\n\nNow, use the formula m*d=x (mass x drive = how much wood a woodchuck would chuck)\n\n\nNow we take all our scientific sounding results and put them into action! Thus one would come to the conclusion that since woodchuck B is the mass of dead with no drive to chuck (0x0=0), and that woodchuck C is a smaller massed female woodchuck with no drive to chuck (?x0=0), and woodchuck D is in fact not a woodchuck at all (?), that woodchuck A would chuck a considerable amount more wood than woodchucks’ B, C, and D.
1175288
If solved, it is the answer to, "How much wood, would a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood".
366125
To assume that a wood chuck could chuck wood we must discover two things?  First, what is a wood chuck?  Is it a wooden animal whose real name is charles but goes by the nickname chuck?  Or is another thing entirely?  Is it a lumberjack named chuck who enshrined himself in this fabled rhyme?  Finally, if it is this lumberjack, is it the Paul Bunyan himself who of course used the alias chuck.  The last possibility concerns a very serious option.  Perhaps the chuck spoken of is Chuck Norris whose muscles are so chiseled, like wood.  If this is true then we all know than a wood chuck can chuck as much wood as you can imagine and more, because he is Chuck Norris.
25219
A wood chuck would chuck as much wood as a wood chuck could if a would chuck could chuck wood!(that is the rest of the twister)
8371
As much wood As a woodchuck would, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.\nthis is the sensible answer.\ni have read the links provided for the same question answered by the\ngoogle researchers but it is very complex i could not understand it\ndid u understand it?\n\nAfter much research from internet which iam doing for the past 6 years.\ni have found a reasonable answer for your q.\n\nANSWER:\nAbout 700 pounds. Compared to beavers, groundhogs/woodchucks are not\nadept at moving timber, although some will chew wood. (At Cornell,\nwoodchucks that gnaw their wooden nest boxes are given scraps of\n2-by-4 lumber.) A wildlife biologist once measured the inside volume\nof a typical woodchuck burrow and estimated that -- if wood filled the\nhole instead of dirt -- the industrious animal would have chucked\nabout 700 pounds' worth\n\n\n\ncheck this links\nhttp://www.beercanbob.com/bobfaq.html\nhttp://nethistory.dumbentia.com/nm8801.html\nhttp://people.cornell.edu/pages/rcd9/surv.html\nhttp://www.lib.washington.edu/Ougl/fun/qboard/wood.html\nhttp://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~naclhv/seekersfaq.htm#q7\nhttp://stpeter.holyinn.org/www/ramblings/1098.html\nhttp://www.beercanbob.com/bobfaq.html\nhttp://www.bathroomreader.com/faq.htm#20\nhttp://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=639629&lastnode_id=16056\nhttp://www.google.com/search?num=30&hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&safe=off&as_qdr=all&q=+%22+if+a+woodchuck+could+chuck+wood++%22+origin+answer&btnG=Google+Search
31899
It's been scientifically proven that a woodchuck will chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
367297
If a woodchuck could chuck wood. A woodchuck would chuck chunks, how may chunks would a woodchunk chunk?\n\nHow many chunks do you need?
2494
As much as a woodchuck could chuck, if a wood chuck could chuck wood.
1035616
Provided a woodchuck could chuck wood, it may be assumed that he would chuck all the wood that a woodchuck could, although the actual amount of wood in terms of board feet would vary according to the physical capabilities and motivation of the particular woodchuck in question. This of course is contingent on the proposition that a woodchuck, would in fact, be capable of chucking wood. This is a fascinating hypothesis, and we all look forward to hearing more such thought provoking questions in the future.
1012607
a wood chuck would chuck as much would as a wood chuck felt like chucking!
51800
A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.