JACK THE RIPPER what was the reason for killing ..?
142938
There's an old saying in the Criminal Justice course I took when I was in college.\n\n"You cannot rationalize irrational thinking."\n\nMeaning that ole Jack probably had a reason, but it was not rational.  You'll only drive yourself crazy trying to find out why....
249058
First, no one murdered Jesus, he gave himself freely to make possible our salvation and return to our Father in Heaven. Secondly, all sins can be forgiven by a loving and forgiving God. While I do not believe as noted about that either the Jews or Romans murdered Christ. Jesus knew what was necessary and again gave himself freely in harmony with the Fathers will.\n\nI do not understand why anyone would want to blame others for the gift of salvation made possible by the life, death and resurrection of Christ. While many may say Jesus was treated poorly at the hands of his oppressors, this does not take away from His willing sacrifice for our future salvation. I do not place blame for the death of Jesus, I give thanks for his willing to die for yours and my sins.\n\nPeace be with you all,\n\n+Michael
832078
Anxious, vigilant. People became terrorised by the idea of a mad, serial killer. There was no television or radio, but there were stories in the press of the time. News spread by word of mouth, so there was exaggeration and a degree of panic in the local population. Against this is the tradtion of British stiff upper lip, " well i wont happen to me!" I m not letting it stop me from going to work or I have to go out tonight to earn my way!\nPerhaps you should read some of Charles Dickens or Charles Booth or other social writers from the time.\nJack the Ripper is a pseudonym given to an unidentified serial killer (or killers) active in the largely impoverished Whitechapel area and adjacent districts of London in the latter half of 1888. The name is taken from a letter to the Central News Agency by someone claiming to be the murderer, published at the time of the killings.\n\nThe legends surrounding the Ripper murders have become a combination of genuine historical research, conspiracy theory and folklore. The lack of a confirmed identity for the killer has allowed Ripperologists — the term used within the field for the authors, historians and amateur detectives who study the case — to accuse a wide variety of individuals of being the Ripper. Newspapers, whose circulation had been growing during this era, bestowed widespread and enduring notoriety on the killer owing to the savagery of the attacks and the failure of the police in their attempts to capture the Ripper, sometimes missing the murderer at his crime scenes by mere minutes.\n\nVictims were women earning income as casual prostitutes. Typical Ripper murders were perpetrated in a public or semi-public place; the victim's throat was cut, after which the body was mutilated. Some believe that the victims were first strangled in order to silence them. The removal of internal organs from some victims has led to the proposal that the killer possessed anatomical or surgical knowledge or skill. Though many diverse theories have been advanced, the world may never know the true identity of Jack the Ripper
902984
Not only because he fell into the roses, but also because previously in the movie, when they stop playing, someone says that the game is playing itself. That means that the countess anticipated killing him, and not him falling into the roses.\n\nThe first people killed off in the movie did not die instantneously, and neither did he because his game death and real death were not done simultaneously, because, unlike the girl that died, he WAS playing the game; the game was not playing her.
842602
wtf?\n\nDon't understand... thought Michael Stone was the bloke who killed the Russells?
307285
greed!power!Control! love! hate!  You name it.  Just about anything.  It's human nature for man to be superior to all others.  The first killing was when Cain killed Able.  And that was because of jealousy.
978328
Not the gipper...Jack the Ripper
745068
He was proved innocent in a court of law.  Why would you hang and innocent person.\n\nCoach
40006
The Murderer that is being executed.  It's a consequence of his crime.
757697
Who did he kill this time?
509563
oswald killed kennedy because he was trying to steal the jack ruby.
628046
Well in my opinion he was a killer only killed 2 women and dugged up the rest of his victims even his own mother. He was a cannibal he would eat there skin and wear it.
860322
In a recent courtroom drama, accused murderer Jack Merridew was almost attacked by fellow defendant Ralph Grant following his statement in the investigation surrounding the deaths on the island. (Nether) boys are in custody.\n\n(the) courtroom environment that had begun in silence erupted into a flurry of activity when Mr. Merridew provided details into the deaths of some of the boys which provoked an outburst by Mr. Grant. He got up from his seating screaming, “You’re such a liar!” His lawyer, Will Hayden, tried to calm him down. Mr. Grant flew out of his chair in a rage and could hardly be stopped. Running to the stand, intending to attack Mr. Merridew but being restrained by the police in time. \n\nsounds great to me! A worthy =)
146888
Why you planning on killing him?
580784
to kill the one that sniched
407897
Jack the Ripper. I think all his victims were female and all were prostitutes.\n\nPeter Sutcliffe, the Yorkshire Ripper was so named because of the similarities between his M. O. and that of Jack the Ripper.
1053228
Why do u want to know about muslim killing muslim?