Why Israel have many Atomic Bomb And No one do nothing ????????
145109
Because they are surrounded by countries where the state-endorsed and led religion has declared jihad against Israel.  As long as Israel has the bomb, they at least hold the bomb over the heads of the eniemies that want to attack them.  \n\nIsrael does not want to destroy Jordan, Egypt, Syria or Iran, but those countries all want every Jew dead.\n\nAt least they will be able to take out a few million islamo-fascists if they are invaded.
459575
You must have posted this just as I put my answer to a similar question! Anyhow, here's what I wrote:\nIran. 200 years and they have never attacked another foreign state. They are members of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (Just like about 170 other countries). They are NOT Iraq, as in, they are well advanced industrially and sanctions won't mean much to them as they are also fairly self sufficient. \nThey HAVE NOT breached ANY of their responsibilities as sigintories of the NPT. They have cooperated with the IAEA and allowed UN inspectors to their facilities.\nHmmmm, The United States is also a member of the NPT and has breached its responsibilities under the treaty several times. The USA has USED the UN to go to war ineffectively no less than SIX times since WWII! That does not include political insurgencies and and the like... Oh, wait, I remember The US has been there and done that. Look at the last time the US messed around with Iran! \nIsrael is not even a signitor of the NPT! Yes folks, Israel is not even a member of the NPT and REFUSES to allow UN Weapons inspectors to monitor their nuclear capabilities. HUH? Yep, it's true... We bomb Iraq back to the stone-age for "Developing WMD without UN Monitoring" (WMD that never even existed) and all the while Israel has a KNOWN Stockpile of WMD and constantly refuses to co-operate with the UN and the IAEA!! Israel is a rogue state! But hey, Pakistan also has WMD and is also not party to the NPT. Weird... They are always wanting to kick their neighbours **** (India) and why aren't USA World Police F*** Yeah wading in there to "Create stability, in the Indian Sub-continent?" Me thinks someone is puppeteering with The USA!
510813
Israel Does not pose a threat to any other middle east country. \nThey can do a great deal of harm if they so wished.\nBut never have i heard of Israel threaten any other country with a nuclear strike. \nUnlike The country of Iran who has threatened to wipe out Israel. \nWhen it has developed the Nuclear weapon to do it. \nBut i will say one further thing, Israel is now nor ever will be a Doormat for any other country to try and wipe their feet on.
350961
The problem isn't that Israel exists, or that there are Arabic (or Persian in the case of Iran) nations. The problem isn't that Israel is occupying Palestine and the Golan Heights. Yes, the Israel-Palestine conflict offers regional leaders "reason" to attack Israel. There would still be much infighting between the many ethnic groups in the region without the Jewish Homeland.\nThe problem arose with the end of the First World War and the division of much of the old Ottoman (Turkish) Empire's Middle-Eastern territory, from the Palestine (as I will refer to the pre-Israel Holy-Land) into Persia (Iran) and the Arabian Peninsula by France and Great Britain (the UK). Much like the division of Africa, ethnic and historical boundaries were disregarded, and unfriendly tribal peoples were crowded into the same states (much like Hutus and Tutsis in Rwanda).\nResentment of the rule by the Western Powers, the Arabs and Persians looked to aid from Hitler's Germany in order to overthrow the French and British. Nazi involvement is therefore an important component in the anti-Semites in the  Middle-East.\nWith the departure of the Western Powers after the Second World War, the Arab states found their political Independence. However, the discovery of oil found the United States becoming increasingly interested in the area. The US sought economic superiority in the region, developing the strong-arm subterfuge tactics that it would later use in Latin America in order to try and control Middle-Eastern Governments. These tactics lead to mass unrest against foreign backed rulers, whether they were Capitalist or Communist (let Iran and Afghanistan be respective examples). Hatred of foreign blessed rulers, and the ideological strife  and rebellion these rulers caused are key causes of the lack of peace in the region. \nIsrael is supported by the US to a startling degree, while the other Middle-Eastern governments  are often products of anger against former rulers, generally fronted by the US. This hatred of America and her puppet rulers abroad is a cause of unrest in the Middle-East, as well as in Latin America (Castro originally led an uprising against US puppet dictator Fulgencio Batista, before US policies caused him to seek Soviet aid and shelter with the Communists), is a component of violent unrest in these regions.\nIt is naive to say that there is any one reason that there could be peace without Israel, or without the Arab (and Persian) states. It is naive to say that the elimination of any one reason is the root cause of unrest in the Middle-East, including the resentment of Israel. Three major reasons could be considered the most important.\n1. Former Franco-British control ignoring ethnic lines (ie lack of "Kashmiristan")\n2. Anti-Semitism introduced by Nazis (actually, this should be Anti-Zionist or Anti-Jewish feelings because the Arabians are actually a Semetic tribe)\n3. Oil and the resulting US attempts to control the region that led to anti-western sentiment that placed such governments in power--this also results in resentment of Israel because of its close ties with the US.\nThis is in no way a simple conflict, but a complex regional conflict with roots dating to the end of the First World War, perhaps even as far back as the Crusades. There are more reasons that I listed above that suggest that there could be much unrest without the Israeli state. \nIsrael's was most likely very much just the point where the Arab states "lost it".
593475
So what if it has bought?The USA sells nuclear weapons to Israel.Why doesn't anyone complains about it???!
437011
Dear Sir you are highly mistaken! It is not Israel thats afraid of Iran but it is the other way round. Israel has full support of the USA so it does not need to fear Iran or any other country of the world for that matter.
339476
Firstly,I am an Asian and I think your attitude toward the Middle-East is very condescending.I hope you realize that this "blowing up" will result in a loss of miilions of human lives?To answer you question,my response is no.If Iran were to get nuclear weapons it is unlikely that they will target their mainly Islamic neighbours since Iran is an Islamic Republic.Israel however would probably be the first to be attacked by Iran.The Jewish State however has also equipped itself with nuclear technology and would doubtless retaliate as soon as possible.As a result more nuclear-equipped countries would be dragged into the fray perhaps resulting in a much-feared nuclear holocaust.And as for "letting" Iran get nuclear weapons it is possible that they already have a nuclear arsenal.President Ahmadinejad is probably just trying to incite America into invading his nation so that he has an excuse to launch a nuclear attack against the latter.
656776
I say that you are crazy.  Iran cannot have nukes, no if's, and's, or but's about it.  They have vowed to wipe Israel off the map, and a nuke would give them the means to do it, and permanently.  A weapon that deadly in the hands of insanity is just that- insanity.
924070
Israel has always held a special position in the world by way of its stranglehold on the US Senate and media. The US says what Israel wants it to say and does what Israel wants it to do.\n\nIf Israel decides to keep its attacks on Gaza quiet, there's not much you or I can do about it. It will be kept quiet. Even in this forum, comments against Israel are suppressed. Just read the previous posts.\n\nBesides, Israeli soldiers murdering innocent women & children in cold blood is nothing new. They've been doing it for 50 years. I've seen footage of an Israeli soldier taking careful aim at a young man running for his life and then firing live rounds. He took 3 full seconds to aim. You do not aim for 3 seconds when you are firing in self-defense. He missed, then he laughed with another soldier who was standing beside him. They looked like they were hunting ducks or something. That's the Zionist mentality. Non-Jews are considered less than human.\n\nOthers have questioned why some say Israeli deaths are acceptable while Palestinian deaths aren't. The difference is that Israelis are occupiers. The land that is now Israel was taken by force from Palestinians. If a burglar breaks into your house and you kill him, it's called self defense. It's the same thing. Israel is the burglar. Palestine is the house.
947526
Why is Israel a rogue terror state? because it defends itself from an enemy that openly says that it will wipe them off the face of the Earth? i do not condone several of the decisions that Israel has made, but at least they have never wiped someone off the face of the earth.
271253
if israel attacks iran ,it wont use a nuclear weapon,countries make nuclear weapons just to threat eachother and keep their independence like north korea and libya but if israel attacks iran at the best result, iran will have the excuse to end the negotiations and start enriching uranium. and iran wont use a nuclear weapon because it doesnt have one so dont worry and if u want to live in peace try to change ur president
304661
only 4 of the 57 muslim nations on this planet recognize the one jewish state of israel. It is simple intollerance and hatred. IN the case of iran, it is a theocratic dictatorship, that diverts its peoples attention from their dire prediciment and living conditions and makes an enemy of of a small nation over 1000 miles away
757735
I think they never explained the attack on teh USS Liberty either. Israel needs to stop and take a long hard look at their aggressive policies before they alianate all of the world and fall again!
908751
Sharon is (was) a war criminal. Modern terrorism (blowing up innocent people to get what you want) was invented by the Israelis. In 1946, while Palestine was being administered by Great Britain, Menachem Begin authorized the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, killing around 100 people, including many British soldiers who were staying there.\n\nIt is true that many in the Middle East want the destruction of Israel. However, it is equally true that Israel wants to kill every Palestinian on the planet. Israel cares only about itself and is certainly no friend of the United States. \n\nInterestingly, the only country on earth that stood to benefit from the US invasion of Iraq is Israel. Political instability in the region is to there advantage – not that they need an advantage, since Israel can simultaneously defeat the combined militaries of every country in the region. Israel is no victim and is as responsible as anyone for the continuing problems in the region.
713428
These people has suffered by the German in WW2 ans in spite of learning from the pain they had, they let others suffer as well. Israel is a terrorist state that managed to get away of everything. The reason is that Israel and the Jewish lobby run the US and US runs the world...no chance for world peace!!\nPOOR PALESTINE!
304565
I can only think of one faith based nation with a nuclear arsenal: Israel.
213095
No. Israel has probably had nuclear weapons for the last 30+ years, and has not used them. Iran, on the other hand, is dedicated to the destruction of Israel, and may or may not use them.\n\nImagine what may happen if Iran possesses nuclear weapons. If an attack is launched by Iran on Israel, Israel would respond in kind. In addition, if one or two nuclear missiles became errant and struck one of the three other nuclear powers in the region (i.e. Pakistan, India, or China), it is very possible that those countries may retaliate against another innocent country (i.e. an errant missile from Israel strikes Pakistan, India is blamed, and those two countries start a nuclear conflict).\n\nIn addition, with that region being so unstable, it is a very real possibility that the base materials of a nuclear weapon may fall into hands other than a nation-state. That would mean that the traditional deterrent of MAD would no longer be applicable. That scenario would only end with the destruction of a city or other high value target, which would cause an immediate response from the victimized country.\n\nShort of it is - Israel has not used any nuclear weapons since they have obtained them. There is no assurance that Iran would do the same.