are roadblocks legal?
153050
Yes. They have to meet certain rules of conduct. Research US Supreme Court ruling Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444, 110 S.Ct. 2481 (1990)
118869
not if it is a fork in the road
952918
It's called being a public nuisance and obstructing traffic.  you can be ticketed and if you refuse to disburse you can be confined
798251
Most firewall software's have a viewable list of what is allowed and what is blocked.  It is dependant on the specific software, so you have to name which Firewall software you are using.
926023
Anything is possible under international law, particularly for clear cut territories like UK/US. To avoid expensive lawyers fees, you can get legal advise in the UK (or even Legal Aid) to obtain an injunction... that's assuming the other party is legit/operational.
299908
Yes, it's still legal.\n\nAll that a cop needs is reasonable suspicion to stop a vehicle. \n\nArticulable facts concerning contraband can also permit a stop, without a traffic infraction.\n\nIt's also written into the legislation that they can stop to check for driver's licences and random breath tests. They don't even have to see you do anything wrong, and they can quite literaly pick people out at random if they choose to.\n\nThe fact that he found an illegal substance and beer in your car will DEFINITELY NOT sit well w/ the judge at your hearing in court...
997613
I'm afraid so. There've been cases where I-pass/ez-pass records (Electronic "tags"  used on Ecoast toll roads.) were subpoenaed in divorce cases.
964433
Please see reference below.\nIf there is no other access to a road, I would say the person will be able to claim right of way by necessity.\nConsulting with a lawyer is a good idea.\nGood luck.
24714
If the land that you have is to be used for a primary residence, then yes, it is possible to get an easment to build some form of road to the location.\n\nIf however, it is hunting land, crop land, or other non primary land, then it proably will not be allowed; instead a trail system will be used instead of a road.\n\nIt is best to contact USFS with the type of land, how many acres the land is, and where it is located, and they will be able to answer your question fully.
605319
I believe they can do so under color of law. \n\nWhen a "peace officer" activates that red light on their car your only lawful action is to yield to that red light. If the officer keeps that red light on and is behind your car, you are not free to go, you are under arrest, although most police will say its only a detention. The test is to ask if you are free to go, if you are not free to go you are under arrest.\n\nThe officer under California law can perform a warrantless arrest under the vehicle code. However as you pointed out the vehicle code can only be used upon commercial vehicles, this is why the DMV is so adamant in issuing Commercial Class C drivers licenses to all people so the officers can pull over just about any car as the vast majority of citizens have admitted to being Class C or other commercial class of driver. Once you show your License you establish you are a driver and subject to regulation.\n\nIf you are not driving a commercial vehicle, California law Vehicle Code Sec. 260(a),(b) can be enlightening. Section 260(a) defines the type of vehicle required to be registered (regulated) under the Vehicle Code, commercial vehicles. Section 260(b) flat out states private cars and housecars are not commercial vehicles. As a citizen you are supposed to have the logical brain power to infer if Commercial Vehicles are required to be regulated, and private cars are not commercial vehicles, then priavte cares are not required to be registered (regulated). \n\nThis is why in farming communities a truck with the NOT FOR HIRE sign can use the public roads unregistered (politicians have placed restrictions on this in recent decades, talk to some old timers they will set you straight).\n\nSo when a peace officer who has taken POST training demands a license, he is making several assumptions, one you have a Drivers License and two, you were engaged in the activity of driving, moving goods or persons for hire via the public easement. If these two presumptions can be proven unfounded then you as a citizen would have excellent grounds for filing a Title 42 Section 1983 action against the offending officer, as well as a Title 18 Section 242. Even if the officer beats the Civilr Rights case, he can't beat the ride you get to take him on through the federal court. So if you feel an offcier has violated your freedoms by giving you a ticket, sue him, at the very least you can pay him back for making you jump trough the Superior Court System, by making the officer jump through the Federal Court System.\n\nThe right to travel is a god given right, including the right to travel in the conveyance of the day unhindered by government actors.
993447
A highway is considered "state property," I can think of no reason why law enforcement agencies would be prohibited from doing so. If it is in their jurisdiction, they should have the authority.\n\nPresumably, they are responsible for enforcing the law everywhere in the county, including "state property" which is the same as "public property."
788325
Doesn't seem entirely on point, but the only case that nearly matches your terms is:\n\n200 Ariz. 523, 29 P.3d 870, 353 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 24\nCourt of Appeals of Arizona,\nDivision 1, Department C.\nHORTON  v. MITCHELL\nNo. 1 CA-CV 00-0500.\nJuly 31, 2001.\n\nNeighbors brought declaratory judgment action against landowner and his successors, seeking permanent injunction to stop landowner from dedicating land to city and to stop city from constructing roadway on land. Following a bench trial, the Superior Court, Maricopa County, No. CV 99-90519, M. Jean Hoag, J., denied the request for an injunction. Neighbors appealed. The Court of Appeals, Garbarino, P.J., held that: (1) neighbors were owners of lot and had right to enforce subdivision's restrictions, and (2) roadway was a structure, and thus was prohibited by the restrictions.\nReversed and remanded.
228604
Try contacting your state Department of Transportation office or your local Department of Motor Vehicles.  They'll have a list a requirements the vehicle must meet to be legal.  Good luck!\n\nhttp://www.fhwa.dot.gov/webstate.htm\nhttp://www.dmv.org/
220144
legal requirements for road signs at the site below, hope this is what you are looking for
364375
beadlocks on the street are illegal....fedral law
465362
The music and blocking of your driveway are illegal.  Contact the police.  They can have visitors all day and night you can't control that, you can only complain if they make "loud" noise.  Also they can park in front of your house, they just can't block the driveway.  The street is public so you can't stop them.
327853
None that are legal. There are illegal ways, but it would not be worth it to me. $250,000 in fines with a possibility of 5 years in jail? Not a good trade for watching King Kong...