Anyone have any personal knowledge if oxygen(ozone)therapy is effective as a cancer treatment?
138149
"Don't let desperation lead you to try things just because someone advises you to do so. Read the information on this web site thoroughly. We strongly recommend that you avoid any "alternative" cancer treatment discussed on Quackwatch."\n\nan excerpt from quackwatch's website.  They discussed and debunk different myths on alternative healing
1075523
It is up to her oncologist. Get a good one. Maybe she will be given radiotherapy. She should stop eating too much meat, do alot of deep breathing cos it seems cancer cells don't like and can't survive on oxygen but thrive on carbon dioxide. Take alot of fresh fruit juice (buy a juicer and start juicing). Take wheatgrass and more vegetables.  Read up on ovarian cancer on the internet.
120036
I agree with the previous answer, while ozone is a powerful cleaning agent, it has also been proven to be harmful. I am a certified Indoor Air Quality professional and I recently wrote an article about things to consider in a home air purifier: \nhttp://www.breathepureair.com/airqualityblog/residential-air-purifiers/\n\nYou may also want to check the Maerican Lung Association, which also has a section titled "Problems with Ozone"\nhttp://www.lungusa.org/site/pp.asp?c=dvLUK9O0E&b=39289\n\nThe EPA also has some great information on their Indoor Air Quality Fact Sheet: Ozone Generators that are Sold as Air Cleaners: An Assessment of Effectiveness and Health Consequences:\nhttp://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/ozonegen.html\n\nThe Canadian Center for Occupational Health and Safety also has a published report about the negative health effects of ozone:\nhttp://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/chemicals/chem_profiles/ozone/health_ozo.html
1087785
hmm maybe through ultraviolet therapy?
1035586
I am 67 and have had Prostate Cancer. My doctor has a very high success rate here in Chicago. He is an Oncologist as well as a Urologist. Operations and "Seeds" don't seem to wotk too well. His treatments do. I wish there was some way to communicate. He is really very good. He cured me.
24278
Depends on how you set it up.\n\nThe result will range from a more complete oxidation of waste to ozone saturating water and start to leave water phase.\n\nOzone is a toxic gas, - avoid ozone release.\nTreated waste will qualitatively not be more harmful than for a "normal" ozone dosis. The quantities of ketones, aldehydes, acids and carbon dioxides will increase and harmfullness depends on quantity.
905705
Yes.\nIn fact its vest to refuse treatment from the mainstream meducal profession, and seek an alternative treatment. There are many cures available.\n\nRead this report.\n\n\nhttp://dgwa1.fortunecity.com/body/cancer.html
577
Please listen to me as I am only here to help. You have to do exactly as I say. Go to the website and look up CESIUM CHLORIDE AND OXYGEN DROPS. The other ones could be green algae and paw paw, etc etc. These medicines are known in the medical field, but they dont talk about it. Because these are natural remedies with no toxic chemicals in it. So, thats why they cant profit from it. If they cant profit, they dont sell. I mean, some are even made of mushrooms that you can grow anywhere. Why would they promote this? These doctors will never make money. So, the FDA has put a restriction on these remedies. They cannot say anything about cancer on their labels. They have to be sold as vitamins or health products. But, the website can tell you how to use it, and what cancers it can cure. See how they are suppressing the world? In fact these treatments can cure up to 90% of patients that doctors have already given up on. Chemo therapy is not a therapy. I would rather die then go through with that. They try to kill your cancer with chemicals and radiation. If they kill all your cancer before they kill all your body cells, then they consider you cured. But, what about after that? Your body is damaged and your health deteriorated. There is almost no recovery to this. How many people you know live past 5 years after chemo therapy? Not much if any at all. And compared to the masses, its almost nothing. What do you have to live with after chemo? Your body is not sunburned, its practically microwaved. CESIUM CHLORIDE can be taken with OXYGEN DROPS. Go to the websites. You can go to these websites and they will give a whole package for you to buy. You can take these medicines over the course of 3 months, a year, or whatever they prescribe. After your mom is feeling well, taking it for about 2 months or more, you can almost garauntee that you are cured. But, you have to listen to them and take it till they tell you to stop. They even cure certain 3rd stage cancers with a 90% success rate. But, time is of the essence so I urge you to buy it as soon as possible and take next day delivery or something. I wish you the best of luck in the future. But, heed my warning, do not go into chemo. They always tell you something fuzzy like, oh..you might live another 2 years, or you might die right away..etc etc....Then how do you decide? But, they always say that people who have been on chemo will only live a maximum of X years after that.  So, if you do exactly what I say, not only will you have a chance to survive, but all your friends that may get cancer...
807488
I know how you feel, but there is hope. \n\nI am currently in the Bahamas with my Mother who has Terminal Lung Cancer. There is a clinic here that has been in operation for over 30 years. We have been here for 4 of our 8 week stay, everyday is really neat. A lot of the patients stick around in the meeting room/ waiting room to visit, and share stories and catch up. There were 40 people all talking and laughing, talking about cancer and life, the returning patients talk about how bad their cancer was 4, 8, 10 even 18 years ago when they started coming to the clinic, the cancer that has since disappeared. There is nothing dangerous or foreign to the treatment, just building up your immune system in a very effective manner. If you want to know more contact me or go to www.immunemedicine.com I cannot tell you how impressed I am with what I have seen and how my Mother has already improved. I know one man who was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, he skipped all US, conventional (poisonous, dangerous) options and went to the Bahamas and is doing great now. Another man who has been coming here for 18 years that had prostate cancer. People with just about every type of cancer. But, they are honest here, you send them your medical information and they will tell you whether they believe they can help you or not, and they will send you home if they don't think you are benefiting. \n\nMy mom has shown drastic improvements and is feeling so much better. and we are in the Bahamas so we are having a good Mother-Daughter vacation.\n\nI have also done a lot of research on the Cesium Chloride/DMSO treatment and think that it has merit and you can do it at home.\n\nThe clinic here believes that a supplement/liquid called VIBE works really well in addition to other treatments, I am going to look in to that some more.\n\nUS doctors push chemo and radiation, but when you look at the statistics and side effects it is not a good option for most people. My Mom had both before we came here and now that I know more about them and have researched them I feel horrible that I let her go through them. She was lucky (so far) the only long term side effect she has shown is short term memory loss. \n\nThe stories I have heard from the other patients here about how they were treated by US medicine astound me. One lady went home to have a shunt put in her liver so she would be ok to come here, but they refused to put it in unless she agreed to do chemotherapy, is that what our country is about? Denying helpful procedures unless we agree to dangerous, toxic ones? The drug companies run US medicine at least when it comes to cancer treatment and it is sad. Most doctors will tell you not to try alternative medicine and some will refuse to even see you again if you do. To some degree they are not to blame, they have not been taught anything about it other than that it is evil and wrong and they would be rejected by their colleagues if they suggested alternatives.\n\nI would also like to tell you about another lady staying at the house we are staying at, she is 86 years old and has breast cancer as well. She arrived at the clinic the same day we did and is doing very well. Her immune system continues to improve and she gained 2 pounds since last week. She is absolutely thrilled with this treatment and knows that it is helping her.\n\nPlease whatever you do, research first. \n\nOne very helpful website is www.cancertutor.com\n\nGood luck!!
971227
get the book "natural cures they dont want you to know about" by kevin Trudeau book number 2 it has alot of stuff that you can do.. my grandfather has been doing it and hes had cancer for like 3 years and he stopped his kemo last year and he seems to be doing better with what the book told him to do.. now i am not saying do what the book says and itll go away.. or even dont listen to the doctors but i am just telling you what my granfather did.. please do what you feel comfortable to do..
1147808
My Adventures in the Ozone Layer\nby S. Fred Singer\nNational Review, June 1989\n \nThe 123-nation Conference to Save the Ozone Layer, held in London in March 1989, ended with a whimper. The developing nations, principally China and India, were quite unconvinced by the evidence and unwilling to go along with the European Community and the United States in rushing to phase out completely the chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and other widely used chemicals. It seems they know better.\n\nIt is rumored that Mrs. Thatcher was converted into a global ozone fan by Sir Crispin Tickell, the diplomat turned eco-freak. Lord knows who the President Bush has been listening to, but he deserves better advice.\n\nNow it's on to a European conference in the Hague to which Maggie and George have not been invited --tsk, tsk-- and then a follow- up to London in Helsinki in May. All this after the 1985 Vienna Convention, the Montreal Protocol (Sept 1987), Geneva, Toronto, and who knows how many other international gabfests in between. Who can keep track of them? Norway's Prime Minister Mrs. Gro Harlem Brundtland hardly spends time in Oslo anymore. My word! When do these people ever govern?\n\nThe hyperactivity this creates in the agencies, mainly in the State Department and EPA, has to be seen to be believed. The congressional Government Accounting Office would have done an investigation and totaled up the thousands of hours and the huge resources spent on this issue -- except for the fact that Congress and its staffs are just as involved. As the Hill folks try to outdo the Administration and the feds dream up new initiatives, things are building up to a fever pitch -- spurred on by lurid stories in the media about the imminent danger. "Arctic Ozone is Poised for a Fall " scream the headlines. "Skin Cancer is on the Rise!" \n\nIs it all hype? Or is it a hoax? And is the hysteria for real? As we'll see later, the scientific basis for the much-touted ozone crisis may be evaporating-- leaving the new breed of geo- eco-politicians high and dry.\n\n\n\n\n--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\nHow did we get here? It's a long way from the supersonic transport to the Antarctic "ozone hole". But it all started with the SST, just twenty years ago. The emerging environmental movement scored its first great victory by convincing Congress to cancel the program to build two SST prototypes that would have been tested in the stratosphere. When sonic boom and noise objections didn't bring down the program, the activists discovered the stratospheric ozone layer and the fact that a fleet of 500 planes might have some influence on the ozone content of the upper atmosphere. Most influential was the argument that a reduction in the ozone content would increase the rate of skin cancers. That did it. And the skin cancer scare has been with us ever since, inextricably intertwined with the stratospheric ozone issue.\nThroughout these past two decades many truths were uncovered by outstanding and imaginative researchers, but many truths were not revealed to the public -- and quite a few things were propagated that departed from scientific truth. Scientists, by and large, behaved honorably, although egos and ambitions collided with the facts, tempting some to ignore facts. Politicians had no such problems or any hesitation to manipulate science and even scientists. And the media had a field day. Let me give you a personal account of this fascinating history.\n\nSSTs and Ozone\n\nI first got involved in the SST issue in 1970 while serving as a deputy assistant administrator of the EPA. I was asked to take on the additional task of chairing an interagency committee for the Department of Transportation on the environmental effects of the SST. Of course, I had some background in atmospheric physics, having been active in the earliest rocket experiments on the ozone layer, and even invented th
434343
I participate in the Cancer Societies Relay for Life.  My sister and I are co-chairing the event this year... It really is an AMAZING experience (if you are interested in attending a relay go to the website and look for information on events in your area:  www.cancer.org )\n\nI also help to plant the flowers by the side of the road in a neighboring town.... it's lots of fun and helps make the community look pretty all summer.\n\nCurrently, I am looking into doing toxin workshops for child care providers... many of the cleaning products used in homes everyday contain harmful chemicals that are slowly affecting people's health... my goal is to show people how to find safer natural alternatives.
431979
Complex and contingent on the type of cancer.  NCI.gov and FDA.gov have links to sites with information on just that.  The problem is, the more research that is done, the more the perspective changes.  For example, folic acid was thought to reduce the risk of heart disease in women but a recent study showed probably not, nor did aspirin.  With respect to cancer, eating only what God put on this earth without the preservatives and artificial substances, seems to be the best route.  Certainly the cabbage family, especially broccoli and the beta-kerotenes have been studied extensively as have the omega 3 fatty acids.  The list is extensive.  Basically when on chemotherapy, cold soft food works the best, if taking a platinum drug, lemon flavors help tolerate the metallic taste.  When on radiation a low residue diet without dairy products is best and when recovering from surgery, well, it depends on the type of surgery.  Most people don't get enough protein or iron in their diets and these are critical for cancer patients.
286275
I've been reading alot about ARDS because I have 2 patients that I'm taking care of right now in the ICU that are not responding to any treatment. There are alot of differing opinions by various experts. It seems that there is nothing that has proven to be effective all of the time. Here are a few links for you.
274493
Absolutely follow the advice of your oncologist this time.\n\nAntioxidants would protect both the normal and cancer cells. Radiation oncologists carefully plan how and where between radiation is given  to kill off the cancer cells and damage as few as possible of your healthy and normal cells.
758587
You will find a lot of "nay sayers" when it comes to chelation therapy.   BMAC may very well be right about cardio renew.  As I recall, that is an oral chelation therapy.  I for one cannot tell you if what they are selling is authentic.  However, I have researched chelation therapy, and firmly believe that it has theraputic value and can start the process of reversing coronary artery disease.   From what I have read, the most effective form is IV chelation.   It is not some magical formula, but I firmly believe that it can have benefits if used while ingesting a very heart healthy diet.  There is simply to much positve data regarding chelation therapy to dismiss it.  The medical community does not endorse it, or for that matter even consider it, because it is outside the norm, and primarily because heart disease is a cash cow to the medical establishement.  Doctors, hospitals, and the medical community as a whole are more concerned with generating revenue than patient care.  And if that means sacrificing patients lives to improve there bottom line, they have demonstrated for many years that this is precisely what they will  do.\n\nPlease keep in mind that chelation therapy is not a cure all, and should be looked at only as a part of the process to returning to improved heart health.  There are of course circumstances that medical intervention such as heart bypass surgery is done out of medical necessity, but that is not always the case.  Chelation and other non invasive therapies, in some cases, can be equally if not more effective than traditional therapies for heart disease.  Speak to a doctor who is open minded regarding different therapies, be certain that your doctors motivation for recommending bypass surgery is not monetary.  Bypass surgery is absolutley necessary for some individuals, but there are many surgeries such as these where non invasive therapy would be adviseable.    Research this thouroughly.  There is a lot of good info. on the web, it just takes time to sort through the mumbo jumbo determining whom you should believe.  The very best of luck to you.
1064706
Ozone is actually O3, and it can only be naturally created in the stratosphere by incoming ultraviolet light.  The problem with the ozone layer isn't a lack of oxygen -- there's plenty to do the job -- but rather the presence of CFC's that have drifted up there from ground level over the past hundred years or so.  Chlorofluorocarbons, in the presence of ultraviolet light, release free chlorine radicals which attack ozone and reduce it to O2 in a catalyzing reaction; it is calculated that each chlorine radical can reduce around 100,000 ozone molecules before reacting with something else and being removed from the stratosphere.  So the removal of ozone becomes greater than the generation of ozone and you get a thinning (the ozone "hole" over the Antarctic and Arctic regions is a result of winter vortex winds which tend to concentrate atmospheric contaminants (including CFC's) in that area right around the poles, worsening the local damage.)\n\nGenerating ozone at ground level does a lot more harm than good -- you need it about fifteen to twenty kilometers up for it to protect you, and at ground level, because ozone is a powerful oxidizing agent, it can do your body a lot of harm.  Add to that the immense expense of generating enough ozone to do any good -- ozone can be artificially created by running an electrical arc through air (it's that "electrical" smell you get before a lightning storm or if your copy machine has been running a long time)  The energy requirements to produce the ozone and the logistics of getting it up to the statosphere soon enough to do us any good have already been estimated, and let's just say if you thought your taxes are high now, just wait for the price tag on this project, estimated by some in the tens of quadrillions of dollars to be effective.  So basically, if all the nations in the world gave us ALL their money, we could jointly afford to make this project a reality.  Ain't gonna happen, sorry to say.\n\nThe best way to repair the hole in the ozone layer is to eliminate the use of CFC's as refrigerants in favor of more ecologically friendly gases, and allow nature to repair itself.  We're already seeing a gradual decrease in the seasonal size of the ozone hole from the reduction or complete cessation of CFC use by most industrialized nations (some developing nations still use CFC's because they're cheap; we're working on trying to get them to switch as well)  It'll take upwards of 50 years before we really see the benefits of this -- takes that long for ground-level gases to rise to the stratosphere through natural circulation.