Diplomacy in the international organisations?
145166
is there?\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=135\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=140\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/griffin3_stream.html
585900
Well the Security Council of the UN is investigating things like the genocide in the Sudan and the Iranian nuclear issue. It was formed by all of the member countries.
744225
negotiations\ncontracts\nperserverence\ninvention
548140
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/hague01.htm\n\nhttp://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/ibasicdocuments/ibasictext/ibasicindex/Pacific%20settlement%20of%20disputes.htm\n\nhttp://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/ibasicdocuments/ibasictext/ibasicindex/Pacific%20settlement%20of%20disputes.htm
794065
Well I think its always nice to be a tad diplomatic when the situation demands it.Sometimes it saves relationships due to misunderstanding.Also diplomatic people are more popular because they don't take sides or get into controversies easily.
527424
better lines of communication between the superpowers. before that the only was through each countries Embassies, with no direct telephone link between the White House and Kremlin.\n\nKennedy managed to avert a war by getting his offer through a radio station in Moscow.
398168
It is my impression it is a plan of containment, and limited action.  Diplomatic pressure is most likely not going to be effective.  Some form of action will be required but it will be a group of nations involved with limited military involvement.
171448
An ambassador's HQ is an embassy. (Was that your question?)
415228
Also try: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_nations
446634
The organization is biased. Specifically, it is biased towards the 5 permanent members of the Security Council (Russia, United States, United Kingdom, France, China.) The Security Council passes some of the most important measures in the UN and is usually the one that prompts a serious international effort (not the general assembly as might be believed.) It has those 5 permanent members and 10 elected members. Yet if a measure goes to vote there and ends up 14 For and 1 Against, and the one "against" happens to be one of those 5 permanent members... The measure fails. \n\n14-1 and 1 wins. This is why the UN can't usually pass any serious measures. Most major world problems involve 1 of these 5 countries and therefore they and they alone can prevent any action against their interests by simply vetoing the resolution, regardless of world opinion.
388007
Does it have to be an Embassy?
581109
Honesty and diplomacy.
865550
How about COMMUNICATION
366611
Diplomacy/Influence - a small nation state may be influenced to ally with and then become an integral part of the larger civilization due to the advantages - benefitting from medical advances (etc).
897529
Normally they carry on diplomacy, ask, and it is considered by the member nations.\n\nIn reality, I think it's about money changing hands, and the promise that even more money will slide from palm to palm as time continues.
837396
Diplomacy can not make up for stupid political decisions. But at least it can present a government's best case to the outside world.\n\nAlso, it can garner support for marginal cases by "calling in chips" for past and future favors. 95% of British people have opposed the Iraqi war from the start. Yet Bush somehow got Blair to support him with troops -- and got numerous other countries to supply at least token forces. We will never (or not for 30 years maybe) know the way he did that, what he promised, how he cajoled. But it was diplomacy that did it.\n\nDiplomacy has existed since pre-Roman times -- since biblical times -- so it must work. Since the 1980s, however, it's changed because CNN does so much reporting, and reports from embassies are less urgent. Also communications have improved; technical staff from governments speak to each other, meet up at conferences. And almost everybody speaks English now.\n\nDiplomacy often fails, but that is no reason to abandon it. The reason why diplomatic staff are rotated every few years is because they are supposed to view local cultures and systems through US eyes. And make representations to local government, industry and the press based on instructions from home. Just as in court half the time advocacy fails and the other side wins, the game must be played even if it's hopeless. Often enough one does succeed.\n\nThe worst is when seasoned diplomats see the inevitable failure of a proposed government policy and are ignored. The Iraq war is such a case. The quagmire was predicted. But as is often the case, negative intelligence and diplomatic opinion were suppressed. As documents go through editing in the process of rising through the ranks and getting clearance at political levels, they tend to be rewritten to reflect what the President wants to hear. That's why the Shah got his visa in 1979, and that's why the US went to war in Iraq.
1148677
Politics on a world scale....