Is there an alternative to broadband cable internet connectivity that really works, and almost as fast?
147155
Cable is definitely fastest, but if you have problems with your BB cable service - and assuming no other cable companies can offer your service - then DSL has to be your next option.  DSL in general aren't as fast, but still acceptable for typical web surfing, internet games, etc.  Of course, there is a possibility that you live too far from the central office, making DSL not an option.  Then, satellite should be your last option.  It is for sure not as fast as cable, but can still be 5x to 10x faster than dial-up.  There is a new offering from a company called Wildblue.  The link below will provide the installation and per month cost, but it really should be the last option.\n\nhttp://www.wildblue.com/forYourHome/index.jsp
625674
http://www.broadbandreports.com/speedtest?more=1\n\nscroll down find a test in your area
306787
The church I attend has the Directway satellite connection.  At the beginning there were more problems with connection.  Though the connection seems to be pretty consistently up now, it is just seemingly slow.\n\nThere is another satellite ISP now called Wild Blue based out of Denver, and they provide service throughout most of US.  Their website has the information on equipment, installation, and monthly pricing.\n\nhttp://www.wildblue.com
67249
http://www.bandwidthplace.com/speedtest/\n\nOne choice.
421549
I HIGHLY recommend Comcast.\n\nWe previously had DSL with SBC.  First, you should know that the SBC Customer Service reps are apparently chosen based on the fact that their IQ is less than 60.  Really, they were NEVER able to help us with any technical issues.  On top of that, we lost our connection due to their technical problems at least once a week.\n\nWhen we moved, we switched to Comcast (FYI, I have DTV for my tv signal, and we chose Comcast specifically for the high-speed connection).  Our connection is now faster AND more reliable.  In the year-and-a-half that we've had Comcast, we have lost the connection maybe three times.  Additionally, when you call them, the Customer Service reps not only listen to your problem, they are able to find a solution and give it to you with courtesy...We also find that when we do have to call, we spend less time on hold than we did with SBC (like 30 seconds compared to 20 minutes).  On top of all this, there have been a couple of occasions when we were late paying the bill...They called us a few days before the service was going to be terminated, and happily accepted the payment plan we suggested, and made it so that we wouldn't lose service.  They are truly a pleasure to deal with.
1180710
hello!\n\nwhat type of connection u want? is it the high speed service or cable or would it be broadband?\n-u can call ur local phone company and ask about their internet service and their features\n-try to ask if their's a lower rate aside 17.99
757912
Bootleggin broadband huh?
177888
Right now broadband is the way to go for speed and file size. It's the fastest. Cable TV are normally the providers of the service. DSL is the fastest telephone line service available, but broadband cable is twice as fast. The guy above me, could have told you with-out all of the extra jibberish.
178005
yes anything is faster than dialup.  i think comcast cable is the best then yahoo dsl
655297
I tried it--the Verizon DSL, that is. Is that what you're talking about?\n\nWhen it worked, the DSL was great. I didn't notice any significant changes from my previous broadband service. However, after a few days, something happened between my computer and the DSL software. I wasn't able to download anything and my computer's performance slowed to something less than a crawl.\n\nI'm not Geek Squad material but I do know my way around a computer system. After running all the diagnostics and disk/system cleanup stuff I had at my disposal, I called Verizon's tech support.\n\nTwo weeks and wh oknows how many phone calls later, they determined there were too many processes running on my computer and I'd need to call in a private tech to fix things.\n\nProblem is, I had changed NOTHING on my computer other than adding the Verizon software. So just for kicks, I deleted it. And guess what. My computer was fixed. I re-connected the broadband line and lo, my internet access was lightning quick.\n\nSo, I got rid of DSL. I really wish it had worked for me because the price is tough to beat. Around here, Comcast has the monopoly on high-speed broadband access. Bleah.\n\nIf you decide to try DSL, I hope it works as well for you as it did for me at first (and that yours never DOES do anything weird like mine did, LOL.)
166413
I originally had cable, which was technically faster (3 meg down) but I switched to DSL.  It's half the speed (1.5 meg down) but i hardly notice the difference...and it's a lot cheaper, too (at least in my area).
54209
The only solution is to get a faster connection.\n\nIf you have phone line, get DSL or Cable.  If you have DSL or cable, get a faster rate plan.  If you have the fastest rate plan available, go to ISDN or fractional T-1.\n\nOther then increasing your bandwith, nothing will make you go faster.  And all those programs that claim they do are just rip-offs.
294880
If DSL is not available. See if your local cable provider has high speed internet available. If that does not work then you can investigate using cellular broadband but watch out as you may find that it is not that fast in your area, as broadband speeds are only available in major metro areas. Then there are Satellite based services which can be very pricey. WIFI always needs a broadband connection somewhere behind it unless you are just talking among a local network.
1066661
torrents would have been my best answer. it doesnt slow me down\n\nNOTE: if you are using a router maybe you should do port forwarding so its not so slow
1184867
Yes.\nHere are some options:\n\nCABLE  \nRequires professional installation of coaxial cable, cable boxes, splitters etc. \n\nPros - Fast download speeds, most cases wiring is already in place, less costly package deals available if purchased w/ phone and tv programming.\n\nCons - Slightly more expensive than DSL\n*Contact your local cable provider.\n\nSATELLITE\nRequires professional installation of a small dish w/ ability to send and receive signals. \n\nPros - Makes internet accessible to remote or rural areas where DSL or Cable access is not available.\n\nCons - Most costly of all options. Download speeds limited. Telephone line needed for initial setup in most cases.\n*Contact Dish Network, DirectTV or your local provider\n\nWIRELESS\nMany municipalities across the country provide or have plans to provide, free wireless access. Your town may fall into this category. Check with your city hall.\n\nHOTSPOTS\nFree - local restaurants, snack shops, bookstores and coffee houses. \n*While using a vendor's free "hotspot," be sure to make a purchase...it will keep you in their good graces and insure that you'll be welcome on your next visit. \n\nCommercial - Requires a subscriber fee or paid account. Some  offer "Pay As You Go" options similar to cellphone offerings.\n\nShared - Neighbor (within 150 ft.) with internet and  wireless router or AP. Offer to pay a small fee to share neighbor's broadband via his/her AP. Just make certain that you both "turn off disk sharing" services and that the arrangement does not violate any provider defined "terms of service."
346417
It's actually possible with some broadband routers. If it has both a usb and an ethernet connection, try installing the usb on one and the ethernet on the other.
732475
I have 30 Mbit/sec FIOS, but I actually can get faster: http://img82.imageshack.us/my.php?image=nonwirelesstestmyspeedsdlsmall.jpg  The problem is that hardly any site will give me that kind of bandwidth.  I still only average 300-1000 KB/sec, when downloading files.  \n\nOh, and the answer to your question is that you're getting what you're paying for.  Pay a bit more, and you'll get ALOT more bandwidth.  For instance: http://www.fiberexperts.com/