Which would you choose: 1) Good defense + bad offense 2) Good offense + bad defense 3) Average on both?
141613
Good D.  If my opponents can't score, they can't win.  And in football, you're defense can score so it goes double for that sport.
986543
good outweigh bad\n\n:> peace\n.
1181072
Don't forget, the players are the ones playing the game. Speaking of players, what happened to Owens? I remember two cups ago, he looked like a sure star. Yesterday, he looked less than average. The same for Beckam, to me, he was a very good player, just a bit of a choker. Very average now. I should not talk. My team, one of the favorites, already won a game. Favorites? They looked mediocre, with a weak defense.
799702
Go for it, Easy job...well at least in my league, all run, barly any passes haha.\n\nPretty good size for both, depends on your build, and speed.
621332
Cover 2 Man out of a 3-4 Over. Not sure where that'll be in your playbook, but it is an excellent defense because all recievers are covered and two safeties are down field to help, plus the linebackers have man on running backs so the run support is boosted to go along with the 3-4 Over formation that slides the D-Line over the strong side of the line.
590566
I guess I would go with Fossum edging out Towers, but they both are pretty bad.  In a head to head game with equal teams, I go with Fossum.  if you are looking for a win and need to know using their respective teams, I might go with Towers due to his better offense behind him.
758806
Definitely the KC defense.  Denver's offense has not played well this year, and the game is at Arrowhead, where the KC crowd will be a factor.  Philadelphia looked lost on offense and defense after McNabb got hurt last week, and I wouldn't want to play anyone's defense against the Colts in Indy.  Start Kansas City, and make sure you get them in before tomorrow!
524734
First requires technical knowledge but reaction time is less important.  Third is more of a reaction position, so it depends on the player.\n\nI would vote for third overall, though.
1182674
KOBE. Scores more and is a better defender.
379641
I would say try to move around on offense, and try to get open where you know you can make a shot. If you don't have a nice touch or are not a 3 point shooter, obviously it does you no good to get open there. However, if you get open within your range, how could they not pass to you? Also, make smart choices. If you teammate has a better look give him the ball. Always look for who has the best shot or the weakest defensive matchup against them.
1100816
It depends on the defensive scheme,  but bump and run is another popular one.  Most of them are just revisions from the teams base defense though.
894518
go with new england because they have a good pass defense and will stop detroit and houston. the only tossup would be miami but they are still a bad team. New England does play teams under .500 as Denver plays teams over .500
162607
wow, i think you mean defense.  but hey here ya go.. there are littlary tons of different variabtions of these.  Some ill give ya are, man to man, 2-3 zone, 1-3-1 zone, 2-1-2 zone, 1-2-2 zone, half court trap, full court trap, box, box and 1, triagle and 2, full court man, run and gun, lack defense (like Grinnell), pressure D, Switching screens, but the one of the best defenses is a great offense...(and visa versa)
527845
Mavs.\n\nSuns got a great offense.\n\nMavs got a great offense.\n\nMavs got a good DEFENSE.\n\nSo Mavs in about six or seven.
780004
me  personal would play a 3 5 2. with wings backs 2 center mid an attacking mid an d2 stickers. attacking while still very diffensive if wing back do the right amount of work. try some one like deco or makalele in the midfeild.
904777
Both Good, But if I had to vote on them, I would go for the second:)\n\nJoke 1... 6/10\n\nJoke 2 ...9/10
516834
I prefer the 85 Chicago Defense. I just know that when I think all time greatest that is always what I think of. The Bears had the name and the swagger. The D just was filled with names. They tore the other teams apart.