Differencies in production efficiencies among nations in producing a particular good result from?
147293
Another one where we first must interpret the question.  I believe you are asking what differences in production policies mean in terms of efficiency in different countries.\n\nThe most efficient production is in a free market economy.  If investors pick and choose freely, and consumers freely pick and choose the results, the market forces of supply and demand produce the best products in the most efficient way possible.  Technology moves forward rapidly to keep up with competition, especially competition from abroad.\n\nGovernment regulations, such as tariffs, inspecters, and on into banning or outright confiscation of the means of production by socialist governments, all interfere with the free market economy.  A prime example is the imposition of a minimum wage, or the increase in the minimum.  Every time the minimum wage is raised, certain industries (fast food, sewing factories and the like) which rely heavily on minimally trained and experienced workers, must lay off some people in order to be able to afford to pay the remainder.  Those people who have few skills and therefore were willing to accept that minimum wage job rather than be unemployed are then thrown out of work.  Since it is no fault of their own, they go on unemployment insurance, and if they are lucky, are channelled into retraining programs, all paid for by taxpayers.  But if they had been able to stay on that minimum job for awhile, they would have learned skills, gained experience, gained seniority.  They could then move up, and everyone involved would benefit.  They'd make more money, they'd spend more money.  The company's efficiency is improved because their workers are getting more and more efficient and experienced.  And so it goes.  The artificial imposition of a cut-off only cut off the people it was supposedly designed to help.  Meanwhile, the manufacturer or service provider has to pay more for his remaining work force, and raise his prices as a result.\n\nIt is an iron-clad rule of the marketplace that somebody pays.  TANSTAAFL:  There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.  Generally, it is the consumer and the tax-payer.
175129
When considering whether to produce more capital or consumer goods, you first must look at the state of firms in south africa. If here is a need for efficiency and productivity among firms and businesses, then capital goods should be produced. Yet to produce profit, firms must offer consumer products. An equilibrium must be found where the amount of consumer goods meets the market demand while producing enough capital goods to sustain firms. A good starting point is to draw a supply/demand graph for south africa goods.
1028147
a: Ireland...more specific the North Side and the British \nd: Gross National Product
579732
i dont think so. why would you think people in other countries and other cultures are lower than your country? based on what? money? standard of living? average population happiness level? stressfull level and divorce rate? number of criminal and prison? average disposable income? nuclear power? morale? spiritual? EQ? IQ?
522596
If u mean productivity by this , it depend on many factors such as i.e. location
461338
You better understand correcly the name of the cordenates afterwards you must look at the chart and identify the trend, then you make your conclusion.\n\nexample: Y´s population of the world, X´s income per head\nthe chart is showing some countries with lower bars than others... Conclusion, some countries have a higher income than others...
570429
At that time, productive land was the standard upon which the power of a country was based. Land was the generator of more $
494073
Interest rates in that country relative to other country's interest rates.\nInterest rate expectations in that country and other countries.\nEconomic situation in that country.\nEconomic situation expectations in that country.\nPolitical stablility in that country.
1103367
it depends society always looks for wyas of making work easier, thus one would say improvment is the use of machines makeing manuel labor safer and easier, and reducing costs, but then one must decide if it is worth the pollution and look at america now, with little manuel labor we have become fatter, so either way there are cosats to which improves a country.
286901
Well increased efficency results in more product and less work.  This mean more money and available resources for the civilization which also mean since the people dont have to worry as much about food they can focus on other advances in society like science and math etc...
894821
You need to ask a more specific answer.  Do you mean area or economic size?  Please ask again, but clearly state your actual question.
143775
I don't know of an actual quantitative or qualitative scale to measure a country's development.   However there is a litmus test that economists generally use to measure how developed a country is.  You see how industrialized it is.  What kind of exporting or importing it does, how much foreign dependency it has.
257371
Gross Domestic Product is now the preferred term to measure how well a country's economy is doing.  It includes all the goods and services produced by the companies of the nation, which includes divisions of companies located in foreign countries.  Gross National Product measures the value of the goods and services of all ecomonic activities within the country regardless who owns the firm.  The value is high or low depends on the previous year's activity, and compared to other nation's GNP/GDP
1136621
Its Macroeconomics... its cheaper to produce goods/ services in Mexico as it is a less developed country. \n\n In Mexican a worker gets paid 50 cents per hour (example), whereas in the USA a worker gets $15 an hour and they both do the same job and the same work at the same standard of quality. \n\nLarge corporations in the USA that compete on a global level have to realise the loss of money they have in wages, they move to less developed countries to gain a competitive advantage, so they can produce more of their product for less and hopefully sell it cheaper (not always.... Economies of Scale).\n\n A real life example is General Motors sacking thousands of workers this year that work in their USA manufacturing departments and planning to build a new plant in China.\n\n Giddy Up!!
121818
The good will differs. and the value of it even differs in every year dependt of its produciton, quality, marketting, publicity etc. itis seen in the statement. the waqy i understood.
98629
it depends on what it powers and the efficency of the motor.
320143
A good measure of wealth would be the Gross National Product, which included the earnings of all Japanese Nationals including those living abroad and that of Japanese assets in other countries.\n\nA good measure is then to find the Gross National Product per capita, which is just the GNP divided by population. This is important because larger countries will automatically have a higer GNP due to its size, but GNP per capita measures the share that each citizen has.