do u agree with the danish newspaper on what they published about muslims' prophet ? why?
140908
No.  Doing or saying anything that is insulting to another person's religion is a line that should not be crossed. I think the words "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" are very appropriate here.
679096
Because the American media is a confused crock pot of B.S. and nuggets of actual truth. If we showed pictures like this all the time, it would just show muslims are just as normal and human as anybody else from any other religion or culture.\n\nDamn, now the FBI is at my door. Thanks a LOT!
387783
Has anybody bothered to report this guy yet? I haven't. I just keep taking his bait. What a glutton for punishment I am.\n\nI hear a Muslim yell it five times a day every day. Usually I stop and listen because it's beautiful. It's very romantic - like church bells in the distance.\n\nNot how you'd react, of course. You wouldn't know beauty (and tolerance) if it bit you on the a*se.
105774
Yes it is. Most of the worlds wars started over religion and this is further proof.\n\nThe Danish imams, who protested the publication of 12 Muhammad cartoons [see them all below] in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten last September, have announced that they want to end the dispute. For four months the imams and their radical Muslim organizations have unsuccesfully demanded government censorship. However, despite immense pressure (also from international organizations such as the UN and the EU) the Danish government refused to call the newspaper to account.\n\nLast week a couple of Norwegian papers decided to publish the cartoons in support of the Danish paper while in Denmark moderate Muslims, encouraged by the government’s refusal to be intimidated by the radicals, have distanced themselves from the imams. The latter announced on Friday that they no longer demand apologies from Jyllands-Posten for the publication. Instead they said they just want two things: a guarantee from the Danish authorities that Muslims can freely practice their religion without being “provoked and discriminated.” And a declaration from Jyllands-Posten that the cartoons were not published with the intention of mocking the Muslim faith. “We want Jyllands-Posten to show respect for the Muslims. This can happen with an apology, but it can also happen in some other way. We will leave it to Jyllands-Posten to come up with some ideas,” said Ahmed Akkari, spokesman of the Muslim organizations. “We want respect for Muhammad restored and we want him to be described as the man he really was in history, and that he gets the respect he deserves,” Akkari stressed that Muslim organizations are still deeply opposed to the publication of the cartoons.
158051
Getting back at them over the cartoons aren't we now...\nThe Danish people are peaceful and very intelligent. These cartoons ought to be water under the bridge...\nJust having a little joke there...
81767
First no matter how nasty or offense the cartoons are to you -- THEY ARE JUST CARTOONS!\n\nSecond, the cartoons were printed previously - IN EGYPT - and there were no anti-Egyptian riots.\n\nThird, Denmark is a nice little democracy and its citizens can handle the voting there just nicely.\n\nFourth, if you want to vote in Denmark then by rights Danes should be able to vote or influence your favorite country. Somehow I doubt you'd want that.
655517
what is up with Islams?? That link is creepy!! Obviously they dont know what love is...no wonder their country is all jacked up!!
615876
Apparently the reformed muslims have rewritten the queeran to be more user friendly.  Muslims still have the problem with the association with the false prophet mohammed.  He was a self admitted child molester and 'married' a 6 year old girl to have sex with her.  He would be arrested in any western culture for doing that.  In muslim cultures, little girls are fair game as long as they have had their first periods.
176201
i read this on bbc world website, that before the denmark newspaper published cartoons of prophet mohammad , on of their cartoonist came to the editors with the cartoon of jesus but one of their editor rejected it by giving the reason that it will arose hate. then why did published the cartoons of porphet mohammad.  \n\nanother reporter said on the same website that islam prohibits to sketch the god and all mesengers which include mohammad, christ and moses. \n\nthen why not another people realize this. \n\nu can check this on bbc website anytime.\n\nand tell me who is rite
158156
yes they aren't funny at all.\nit seems the only reason af publishing them, is this situation:\n\nhere they are:\nhttp://www.di2.nu/files/Muhammed_Cartoons_Jyllands_Posten.html
84016
-From the source quoted below...\n\n"Controversy over the publication of images depicting Mohammed in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten has erupted into an international furor. While Muslims worldwide are calling for a boycott of Denmark and any other nation whose press reprints the cartoons, Europeans are trying to stand up for Western principles of freedom of speech and not cave in to self-censorship in the name of multiculturalism and fear."\n\n"While the debate rages, an important point has been overlooked: despite the Islamic prohibition against depicting Mohammed under any circumstances, hundreds of paintings, drawings and other images of Mohammed have been created over the centuries, with nary a word of complaint from the Muslim world. The recent cartoons in Jyllands-Posten are nothing new; it's just that no other images of Mohammed have ever been so widely publicized. "\n\n<snip>\n\nIt's also hypothsised that the situation was inflamed by the addition of 3 images that were NOT printed by the Danish newspaper.\n\n"Yet when a delegation of Danish imams went to the Middle East to discuss the issue of the cartoons with senior officials and prominent Islamic scholars, the imams openly distributed a booklet that showed 15 images -- not only the original 12 cartoons, but three fraudulent anti-Mohammed depictions that were much more offensive than the ones published in Denmark. It is now thought that these three bonus images are what ignited the outrage in the Muslim world. The newspaper Ekstra Bladet obtained a copy of the booklet and presented the three offensive images on its Web site (though not in an easy-to-find place). All look like low-quality photocopies."\n\nIt comes down to a clash of cultures and an intolerance of world views. Perhaps with a little provocation thrown in. I can't explain the level of violence though. Seems pretty extreme.
92275
Good for you for sharing that...\n\nThe Mufti of Marseille quoted the same verses...\nHe was angered by the muslim community for demonstrating against the Cartoons \n\nHe said that especially Western Muslims, have benefited greatly from Free Speehc and Free Press...\n\nHe said that those manifestations where the proof that Muslims were week in their faith because they got offended for just a few cartoons of bad tastes. He also says that Criticism helps make one strong and look at himself.\n\nHe also added: That the current problem with Islam in the West and Arab countries is that there are more and more Imam that dont have enough spiritual knowledge of Islam and they are too focused on the political aspect of Islam... Such as the Imam of Danemark that provoked the whole situation...\n\nSo you are right to ask that questions.... But very very very few Muftis and Imams voice the spiritual view of Islam...Mr. Benchek. the Mufti of Marseille is a rare gem (With Balls I might say...).
938850
I'm not muslim, but you're absolutely right!\n\nPlease can you translate that heading of yours that's all in Arabic? I'm interested in knowing what it says! =)
504061
Rushdie's book banned? That's insignificant! He was sentenced to death for writing his book! But in China you can get tortured for carrying a Xtian bible. Look at the way the Islamists called for the beheading of the Danish cartoonists! What religion do you know of that is truly tolerant of (all) others?
121068
Because danish laws are well-done!! He hasn't done anything reprehensible.\n\nPS: my answer does not mean that I agree with the drawings of the journalist.
542526
This is the second time I posted this answer.\n\nThere's nothing really spectacular or journalistic about it, that's why, and media, may it be in the west or middle east cannot earn and would close down in no time if they would show things like that. \n\nWhat you have featured here are nothing new and it is too ordinary for media to give inportance to. In short those are not news materials, those are just simple pictures that may or may not entice people to see. That's why the word news came from the word "NEW" because people would only put interest on new things that happens around them. So, terrorism is news because it's new to a lot of people and it attracts attention and that's what terrorist wants. This way they increase TV viewing increasing their income by increasing the chances of getting good sponsors. There is nothing personal to it, really. So, don't point to the media the problems of Islam. Stop pointing your accusing fingers or else you will only see the mistakes of others and not yours. \n\nIn order for correction or change to take place, there should be acceptance of mistake first because how can you correct your own mistake if you don't see your own mistakes but instead see the mistakes of others. It's like barking on the wrong tree.\n\nMedia only report what they see. I don't believe that there are intentions of twisting the truth because what they report are only what is available to them and they don't have the whole world on their shoulders. If media twists the truth, who will really suffer in the end? We know it's not the sponsors or their viewers but them. Because the truth is that, in the free world, when their credibility suffers, their future follows.  \n\nSo, it nothing new really, I hope you got the picture so that you'll stop wondering anymore. By the way I am not a journalist, I am just an ordinary person who has an open mind who checks on my own fault first before looking at others.
657931
Why would you take it seriously though?\n\nIt is fiction, that is like asking if Harry Potter would make Muslims give up their faith.\n\nWhile Dan Brown does site some facts, they are hard facts such as the existence of Opus Dei and facts taken out of context can make any fiction seem real.