what will happen to the world if president bush takes over osama bin laden as commander of al-quaida?
155285
Bush just doesn't have enough personal wealth for that job.  Osama is loaded and is selective in his spending.  On the other hand, Bush spends America's money as if there were no tomorrow.  Osama counts on tomorrow & all the people he can buy. God help us.
811134
Bush is friends with the Bin Laden Family, here I have a link with Bush walking in a flower garden of Bush's, with Prince Abdullah Bin Laden at the Ranch in Crawford Texas. Holding Hands!!!\nhttp://hurryupharry.bloghouse.net/archives/2005/04/26/monitoring_bush_i_wanna_hold_your_hand.php
123340
U will get married when George W Bush dies, triggering WWIII, which will lead to India being the next super power!!!
392082
Lolz, i think that the US will still continue on to be the world power and slowly try to unite the world under Bush.  Once all the world is renamed into the great UNITED STATES OF EARTH, Bush will be our "central" leader and bring peace to all!!!\nNO WORLD WAR 3!!! ALL HAIL BUSH!!!\n=)
715860
Please. And Bush was not a chickenhawk? Gimme a break. 9/11 happened on bush's watch. Even the 9/11 comission said so. And he STILL hasn't got bin Laden. In fact, i heard Bin Laden is chillin' in New orleans. Cuz we ALL know that no republicans will go THERE! HA!
167527
Osama destroyed some buildings. \nG.W. is destroying the Country.\n\nOsama has gotten some Arabs mad at us.\nG.W. has gotten all the rest of the Arabs and the whole world mad at us.\n\nBush is a much bigger threat.
808111
The president is George W. Bush.
688162
In regards to Bush leaving, it depends on who would replace him. As for the world being better off with out the entire USA, I guess much of the world would have serious financial problems considering how much money, food, and aid the USA gives to everyone else.
1088512
America of course ,how can there be any doubts about that.\nbecause they are going to take control of the world by force and most likely start a nuclear war.\nnot even talking about all the wars they were involved in  or how many people they have already killed.\n\n Millions of people's lives have been destroyed by lack of knowledge in the past. Today, Billions more may succumb to the lies and hatred of those who strive with all their might to mold our perceptions and minds. There exists a small group of powerful people, David Rockefeller \nis one of them, who today command vast fortunes and they wish to own and control the entire world for themselves. A small number of the rich and powerful have learned how to incrementally control the vast majority of us through our own individual prejudices, desires, and \ngreed. When stacked up, that represents almost a total power monopoly over humanity into a few hands. \n\nThe Bush family, beginning with Prescott Bush, have served as satraps of the Rockefeller, Brown, and Harriman interests. President Bush is simply a puppet of this powerful cabal, and their schemes will be carried out by whatever next president comes to power to effect an insane, murderous plot for global dominance.
967281
Depends:\n\nRepublican Answer: Bin Laden, Saddam\n\nDemocrat Answer: Bush, Olmert
1010826
What?! Are you nuts?!!! That's a fate worse than capturing him, throwing his a-- in Gitmo and subjecting him to torture! But like THAT'S gonna happen...most likely George HW Bush will have both Anna Nicole AND Osama (since they go way back) down to the ranch in Crawford for a big barbeque and orgy!
61426
He is alive, and with the Bush's friendship with the Bin Laden family and Saudi royalty, it is not far-fetched that his pursuit and eventual capture is theatrical.  Not to bow to conspiracy, but it is plausible his whereabouts are known.  But the better half of me has to deny all this, as the burden of 3,000 lives would be awful heavy on Bush's conscience.
1124021
no, but george bush is related to osama bin laden
660846
You are so right.\nI personally think we have Bin Laden.  Bush will produce him when he needs him.
669946
In his latest audiotape which was released on January 19th, Osama ben Laden had declared: "If you [Americans] are sincere in your desire for peace and security, we have answered you. And if Bush decides to carry on with his lies and oppression, then it would be useful for you to read the book _Rogue State', which states in its introduction ... " He then goes on to quote the opening of a paragraph (which appears actually in the Foreword of the British edition only, that was later translated to Arabic), which in full reads:\n "If I were the president, I could stop terrorist attacks against the United States in a few days. Permanently. I would first apologize -- very publicly and very sincerely -- to all the widows and the orphans, the impoverished and the tortured, and all the many millions of other victims of American imperialism. I would then announce that America’s global interventions -- including the awful bombings -- have come to an end. And I would inform Israel that it is no longer the 51st state of the union but -– oddly enough -– a foreign country. I would then reduce the military budget by at least 90% and use the savings to pay reparations to the victims and repair the damage from the many American bombings and invasions. There would be more than enough money. Do you know what one year of the US military budget is equal to? One year. It’s equal to more than $20,000 per hour for every hour since Jesus Christ was born.\n"That’s what I’d do on my first three days in the White House. On the fourth day, I’d be assassinated."\nThe stunning victory of the Islamic Resistance Movement Party Hamas in the Palestinian elections underlines the central contradictions in the Bush administration's policies toward the the Islamic World. Hamas' stunning victory underlines the contradictions, hypocrisies and double-standard in Bush's Mideast policies.\nDemocracy depends not just on elections but on a rule of law, on stable institutions, on basic economic security for the population, and on checks and balances that forestall a tyranny of the majority. Elections in the absence of this key societal context can produce authoritarian regimes and abuses as easily as they can produce genuine people power. Bush is on the whole unwilling to invest sufficiently in these key institutions and practices abroad. And by either creating or failing to deal with hated foreign occupations, he has opened our minds to the fact that only militant Islamist movements that gain popularity because of their honest credentials is only the way forward.
307924
I think he would have gone into Afghanistan and focused on getting Bin Laden. He probably would also have strengthened security measures within the states (something that Bush still hasn't done, or at least not to an extent where it shows a difference). One thing that he would not have done was go into Iraq for supposed WMDs.
347184
BUSH IS GOOD FRIENDS WITH THE BIN LADEN FAMILY.\n\nBUY OR RENT FAHRENHEIT 9/11.