What are the effects of Nationalism?
139656
You should make difference between patriotism and nationalism. They are both love for ones country, but the first has a positive conotation and the second has a negative.\nSo the result can be from preventing imigrants in the coutry to more drastic things. Such as violation of human rights and gun use.
1019324
Not much effects on economy or social well beings..\nThis is because one party employs 'whips' to enforce bench members to 'aye' the motion, even though he/she felt differently..\n\n...if u know what I meant...
688206
Fascism was a national movement and played on the strong feelings of nationalism (national pride). The Treaty of Versailles, which ended WWI, punished the Germans for their role in that war. As a result, their ability to arm themselves and to create and support large armed forces was taken away from them. They also had to pay large amounts of money to other countries for war debt, causing serious economic problems for them.\n\nAlong came Adolph Hitler who played upon the worst instincts of the German people and kept telling them they were a superior race, that they were economically in trouble because of other countries who were unduly punishing them for WWI. He promised to restore the country  economic superiority, to create and maintain  an armed force worthy of a world power (for defense, of course), and to make Germany a world power again as it indeed was destined to be (according to Hitler).\n\nThey believed him, and the rest is history.
945329
Here are a couple:\n\n1. Development of Canadian nationalism:\n\nDespite all of the people that Canada lost in the First World War, there were many battles in which Canadians fought valiantly. Canadians became known for their bravery and strength, and we began to see ourselves as a nation separate from Britain, capable of accomplishing our own goals. Specifically, you should look into the battle at Vimy Ridge and Ypres.\n\n2. The war caused women's roles to start to change. Look for facts about:\n\n-More Canadian women in the workforce.\n-The Canadian suffragist movement.\n\nPerhaps you might also want to say something about how the war was a pre-cursor to the Roaring Twenties in Canada, or how the war helped us to industrialize.
497325
There are no words like creative nationalism. Every one is a nationalist for his country. The worst example (sorry) of true nationalism could be referred to the Talibanis, who feel that they are creative nationalists, and the entire world knows(-Iran) that they are terrorists.
295538
"One of the most obvious effects of the famine was emigration. Although the famine itself probably resulted in about 1 million deaths, the resultant emigration caused the population to drop by a further 3 million. About 1 million of these are estimated to have emigrated in the immediate famine period, with the depression that followed continuing the decline until the second half of the 20th century. These migrants largely ended up in North America, with some in Australia and in Britain."\nTable of figures at the site below
444288
Too much nationalistic pride. But it is not even about them really loving their country it is because they don't like other countries. But it isn't even about their hate of other countries. It is simply because they are angry. Angry about the way their life is, angry about their lack of success, and hard times. They blame this on everyone else instead of accepting responsibility for their own lives. Blame it on a race, other country, God, even society.
405995
Globalization affects the periphery countries very negatively. With things like structural adjustment programs forcing third world gov. to give up their soverignty there is very little a country can do to try and find there own sustainable way to grow their country. Since these countries are often exploited through investment and the labor practices of transnationals it shouldnt suprise anyone that discontent and instability is often a third world problem.
669461
The terms "Ethnic Rivalry" and "Spill over effects" relate to the cause and the far reaching outcomes of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. (Burundi also had had a similar experience before Rwanda's genocide)\n\nRwanda is a country with only two tribes - the Hutus and the Tutsi. These tribes were in constant struggle for ruling the country. The thirst for power thus resulted in ethnic rivalry between the two tribe, that culminated in the genocide.\n\nThe direct effects of the genocide was the murdering of million people (I don't remember the exact figure, u can search on google). However the effects of the genocide could not be contained within Rwanda borders. Rwandese had to flee their country to save their lives. Most fled to the neighbouring country of Tanzania, thus adding a burden to the already strained social services in the country. Some refugees went as far away as Europe and the US. This is one example of a spill over effect of Rwanda's genocide.\n\nHope I have shed some light into your queery. Feel free to contact me if more clarification is required.
602811
The answer to this question would fill a book and you certainly couldnt do it justice here.\n\nMaybe break the question down into sub questions like what effect did it have immediately during the conflict, what effect did it have on politics, religion, welfare, human rights, future wars etc.\n\nThat will give people a chance to give you good short answers which will then build up a picture.
1069329
Nationalism is a form of identity that holds that (ethnically or culturally defined) nations are the "fundamental units" for human social life, and makes certain cultural and political claims based upon that belief; in particular, the claim that the nation is "the only legitimate basis for the state", and that "each nation is entitled to its own state." Nationalism also refers to the specific ideologies of various nationalist movements, which make cultural and political claims on behalf of specific nations.\n\nPatriotism denotes positive attitudes by individuals to their own perceived civic or political community, to its culture, its members, and to its interests. Actions towards other countries, or to non-civic groups, are not generally described as patriotic, and they may be referred to by a specific name, such as pro-Greek philhellenism. Patriotism is closely related to nationalism. Differences between the two are commonly claimed to be that patriotism is primarily emotional and related to positive attitudes to one's own community, while nationalism combines both positive attitudes to one's own community and negative attitudes to other communities and is related to war
87465
These were all properties of the Nazi movement, or Nazi Party, as it became.  Nationalism, the assumption that one's own nation is somehow more valuable or right than any other, was used to manipulate what had been a justifiable German pride, turning it into a negative thing. (Not "we are great," but "everyone else is worthless.")  Imperialism then followed rather inevitably from that: if the people of other countries are worthless or inferior, why not take them over, to improve them by making them German?  Militarism was then needed to achieve that goal, and Hitler assembled amazingly large and well-disciplined armies to carry out his imperialist purposes.  The war came, then, because the countries invaded did not just roll over and play dead, but fought back.
563383
it's a side effect of multi-culturalism.
498112
They were divided into North Korea and South Korea with Nationalism being a problem. Also North Korea was Communist and South Korea had a government supported by the United States.
659188
good project...I don't know all the answers to your questions but I bet if you googled it with the phrase\n*German Nationalism post WWII* you'd get a lot of info.\n(use the asterisk's to lock in the topic)
761007
Get real it was the result of a nation gone mad, religious or other\nwise
421906
The rise of nationalism.\n\nEurope avoided major wars in the 100 years before World War 1 began. In the 1800's, a force swept across the continent that helped bring about the Great War. The force was nationalism - the belief that loyalty to a person's nation and its political and economic goals comes before any other public loyalty. During the 1800's nationalism took hold among people who shared a common language, history, or culture. Such people began to view themselves as members a national group or nation. Nationalism led to the creation of two new powers - Italy and Germany - through the uniting of many small states. War had a major role in achieving nation unification in Italy and Germany. On the other hand, nationalism weakened the eastern European empires of Austria-Hungary, Russia, and Ottoman Turkey. Those empires ruled many national groups that clamored for independence. The Balkan Peninsula or the "Powder Keg of Europe" caused tensions and therefore threatened to ignite a major war. Rivalry for control of the Balkans added to the tensions that erupted into World War 1.\n\n\nA build-up of military might occurred among European countries before World War 1 broke out. Nationalism encouraged public support for military build-ups and for a country's use of force to achieve its goals. By the late 1800's, Germany had the best-trained army in the world. In 1898 Germany began developing a naval force that was big enough to challenge the British navy. In 1906, the British navy launched the Dreadnought, the first modern battleship. The Dreadnought had greater firepower that any other ship of its time. Germany rushed to construct on just like it. Advances in technology helped aid in making military forces stronger. Machine guns and other new arms fired more accurately and more rapidly than earlier weapons. By the end of the 1800's, technology enabled countries to fight longer and bear greater losses that ever before.\n\n\nA system of military alliances gave European powers a sense of security before World War 1. They formed these alliances with each other for protection and guarantee that other members of the alliance would come to the country's aid if attacked. Although alliances provided protection, the system also created certain dangers. If war came, the alliance system meant that a number of nations would fight, not only the two involved in a dispute. Alliances could force a country to go to war against a nation it had no quarrel with. In addition, the terms of many alliances were kept secret. The secrecy also increased the chances that a county might guess wrong about the consequences of its actions. The Triple Alliance was made up of 3 countries, Germany, Italy, and Austria-Hungary. They all agreed to go to war if attacked by Russia. Bismarck also brought Austria-Hungary and Germany into alliance with Russia. The agreement was known as the Three Emperor's League and was formed in 1881. They all agreed to remain neutral if any of them went to war with another country. In 1890 when Bismarck left office it gave a chance for Russia and France to form an alliance. In 1894, France and Russia agreed to call up troops if any nation in the Triple Alliance mobilized. Russia and France also agreed to help each other if either were attacked be Germany. \n\nBeginning of the War\n\nOn June 28, 1914 a Serbian terrorist named Gavrilo Princip assassinated Archduke Francis Ferdinand.  The Archduke's assassination triggered the outbreak of World War 1. On July 28 Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia. Because of Austria-Hungary's alliance with Germany, Serbia sought help from Russia. In 1914 Russia vowed to stand behind Serbia, but first Russia gained support from France. Germany declared war on Russia on Aug. 1, 1914, in response to Russia’s mobilization. Two days later Germany declared war on France. The German Army swept into Belgium on its way to France. The invasion of Belgium cause