can you train a train,, or can you train a train to train?
149869
i don't know thanks for the points
526550
What type of training are you trying to conduct? Is this during the teaching day or after? This information would help me to answer your question.
819772
by three line segments duh.. a traingle
351713
In American English it is CANNOT, but I think that in British English you can use "can not."
704858
You can do either of those if you want to.\n\n///
464630
trainning makes you better, faster, more efficient,.,, in whatever ya training.
485026
Line is related to train tracks, like the "Red Line" or the "Sandy Line".\n\nPath - I don't know, but I think related to "route"\n\nRoute - How you get from Point A to Point B. There are many different routes usually. You can choose from walking, riding the bus, taking a taxi or a train, or any combination of these makes up the route that you take to get from Point A to Point B. The route can be chosen to minimize the time it takes, or to minimize the amount of walking that is needed, or any number of other choices.
255598
It depends on what the sentence is talking about.  \n\nFor example, if your original sentence says "James Mitchell is the instructor of the class." the revised sentence can be "James Mitchell instructs the class."\n\nWithout more detail, I can't suggest any verbs in particular.
552082
Yes.  \n\nYes, you can.
548200
Here's a simple exercise.  Go down to the train tracks and throw yourself in front of an onrushing train.  If you are hit and killed, whether or not it was predetermined is something you can investigate on the other side.  Maybe.
1148784
well if there was, then he wouldnt in theory be training, But more or less learning or practicing, You cant train something you dont know in the first place.
1039781
Depends on how long the train is.....right?
321681
Well, I'm assuming that the spelling errors ("helps" not "heps") aren't the focus of your question.\n\nI think the second sentence is correct. Though both sentences make sense and are very similar, the second one does not have that extra "to" in front of the word learn. That "to" is unnecessary, and concise sentences are generally more correct than less concise ones that convey the same meaning.
425034
<<listening to one other>>\n\nshould read "listening to one **another**.  \n\nassuming "following and following a conductor" are two different things. \n\ngood use case for answers. :)
267755
Can it? Yes. Does it have to? No.
112063
They are not trainable in the way that horses have been bred to be.  You should look up an earlier question a few hours ago about horses and riders (and read the answers).
186462
I'd like to see a woman at the helm of a train :)