If you go faster than seed of light and you turn your lights on can u see your lights?
143269
As you approach the speed of light, your mass approached infinity... As your mass approaches infinity, it takes more force for you to accelerate... Therefore, I don't think it is possible for you to acchieve the speed of light...
990349
No. You wouldnt know or need to know because your nowhere near any part of the front or backline of the forces. P.s you changed those lightbulbs yet?
1005278
Yes, light travels faster than sound. You can tell from several \nexamples. The best would probably be that of lightning and thunder. The next \ntime during a storm, if you notice when lightning flashes across the sky and \nwhen you hear thunder, you will find that it is always the lightning that \nflashes before the thunder. This is because lightning (i.e. light) travels \nfaster than thunder (i.e. sound), and reaches you faster, so that you see the \nlightning before you hear the thunder. In fact, light is enormously faster than \nsound. Light travels at 300,000,000 metres per second (i.e. 300 million metres \nper second), while poor old sound travels only at 330 metres per second.
1042298
No it can't.\n\nLaser light goes at exactly the speed of light.
763848
you couldn't drive at the speed of light.  But if you could drive near the speed of light, and turned on your headlights, light would leave your car at the speed of light relative to the car.  Einstein asked this very same question (except I think he used a train).  ANYWAY......this seems paradoxical and impossible.  But it's not....because TIME and SPACE (and distance and mass and all other measly "constants") change in order to make this possible that the speed of light still remain a constant.\nP.S. - Don't expect to understand all of this at once.  I'm pretty bright and it took me quite awhile to catch on to just how it works.
555954
Updated 1997 by PEG.\nOriginal by Philip Gibbs 1997.\n\n\nI am driving my car at the speed of light and I turn on my headlights.  What do I see?\n\nSadly this question and all others about experiences at the speed of light do not have a definitive answer.  You cannot go at the speed of light so the question is hypothetical.  Hypothetical questions do not have definitive answers.  Only massless particles such as photons can go at the speed of light.  As a massive object approaches the speed of light the amount of energy needed to accelerate it further increases so that an infinite amount would be needed to reach the speed of light.\n\nSometimes people persist: What would the world look like in the reference frame of a photon?  What does a photon experience?  Does space contract to two dimensions at the speed of light?  Does time stop for a photon?. . .  It is really not possible to make sense of such questions and any attempt to do so is bound to lead to paradoxes.  There are no inertial reference frames in which the photon is at rest so it is hopeless to try to imagine what it would be like in one.  Photons do not have experiences.  There is no sense in saying that time stops when you go at the speed of light.  This is not a failing of the theory of relativity.  There are no inconsistencies revealed by these questions.  They just don't make sense.\n\nDespite these empty answers, nobody should feel too put down for asking such questions.  They are exactly the kind of question that Einstein often asked himself from the age of 16 until he discovered special relativity ten years later.  Einstein reported that in 1896 he thought,\n\n``If I pursue a beam of light with the velocity c (velocity of light in a vacuum), I should observe such a beam of light as a spatially oscillatory electromagnetic field at rest.  However, there seems to be no such thing, whether on the basis of experience or according to Maxwell's equations.  From the very beginning it appeared to me intuitively clear that, judged from the standpoint of such an observer, everything would have to happen according to the same laws as for an observer who, relative to the earth, was at rest.  For how, otherwise, should the first observer know, i.e., be able to determine, that he is in a state of fast uniform motion?  One sees that in this paradox the germ of the special relativity theory is already contained.  Today everyone knows, of course, that all attempts to clarify this paradox satisfactorily were condemned to failure as long as the axiom of the absolute character of time, viz., of a simultaneous, unrecognizedly was anchored in the unconscious.  Clearly to recognize this axiom and its arbitrary character really implies already the solution to the problem.''\n\nIn 1905 he realised how it could be that light always goes at the same speed no matter how fast you go.  Events that are simultaneous in one reference frame will happen at different times in another that has a velocity relative to the first.  Space and time cannot be taken as absolute.  On this basis Einstein constructed the theory of special relativity, which has since been well confirmed by experiment.\n\nQuestions of relative velocity in relativity can be answered using the velocity subtraction formula v = (w - u)/(1 - wu/c2) (see relativity FAQ: velocity addition).  If you are driving at a speed u relative to me and you measure the speed of light in the same direction (w = c in my frame), the formula gives v the speed of light in your reference frame as, v = (c-u)/(1 - u/c).  For any speed u less than c this gives v = c so the speed of light is the same for you.  But if u = c the formula degenerates to zero divided by zero; a meaningless answer.\n\nIf you want to know what happens when you are driving at very nearly the speed of light, an answer can be given.  Within your car you observe no unusual effects.  You can look at yourself in your mirror which is moving with the car and you will lo
998287
Well, when I drive the speed of light in my car... \n\nI think the person in front of you would see that they're on, but they wouldn't illuminate anything.
157911
use a blacK light and see what happens
724874
Answer is yes.  By "seeing", what we really mean is our eyes receiving light either reflected or emitted from an object.  It doesn't matter how fast the object is moving, or if it's approaching or receeding - the speed of light is constant, therefore you will see it both coming and going.  That's one of the beautys of relativity - the speed of light is not relative to the object it's coming from, but instead is fixed and will measure the same speed for all observers in the universe, moving or not.
767825
Do u see the Lights on ur CPU or computer.?\nDo you see lights on the Monitor that its turned on ?
506771
Actually by what Einstein explained, da light will still be in  front of da car, it won't go behind u no matter how fast u r going even if u r faster dan da speed of light. Weird? rit. I too thought so, It was explained in discovery channel. Well I'll try 2 explain it 2 u, But it wud hav been easier if I cud actually show it by som animations. When u r travellin at da speed of light, time stops. Ya it does. Time is somthin like per user setting, it is unique for u & each & every one. Think dat ur carrying an Einstein's clock, which is a simple devise with 2 mirrors facing each other with a photon bouncin of the mirror. Each time it bounces from a mirror u'll hear a tic sound, that will b 1 second for u. Say u travel at a speed little less dan light u r movin forward but da photon has 2 move a lot more distance than it initially had been, which was in a straight line, but now it's motion will b som what like a hypotenuse, so it has 2 travell more distance dependin on ur speed. So ur 1 sec will not be da same as 1 sec is for som 1 on earth. So actually ur headlight will be actually movin faster dan u no matter what
970195
This is one of the oldest questions in the world, after Einstein came out with his special relativity.  The answer is that no matter how fast you are going, your headlight beam is STILL shining ahead at the speed of light. This is exactly what the equations say, and it works.  If it wasn't true, then all the giant particle smashers in the world costing billions of dollars wouldn't even work.
24020
Neglecting the lengthy derivation of why light speed travel is impossible, the first postulate of relativity is that light has the same velocity regardless of how fast you're moving.  So, at ANY speed you can achieve in your car, when you turn the lights on you'll see the waves moving away from you very very quickly.
1075094
Of course they'll work. The question is if you will see them. You can't travel at the speed of light, anyway, or physics is wrong, so nobody would be able to give you an answer. \n\nAssuming you were just really close to the speed of light, you would still see them. Einstein discovered that the speed of light in a vacuum is constant to ALL observers, no matter how fast the source of light is going relative to the observer. So at any speed, you can see your headlights just fine.
1081423
the speed of light is constant no matter what your reference frame is, so the light from your headlights travels at the speed of light (as seen by you in the moving car and by a person standing on the side of the road)
935501
Well theoretically you wouldnt be able to travel at the speed of light. At the speed of light yoru mass would become infinite and time would virtually stop for you. But at the speed of light the light would still be infront of you. Think of it this way if you are in a race and the runner directly infront of you is traveling at the same velocity as you you would neither fall behind nor would you catch up. So the light would be in front of you.
647799
You can't go at the speed of light. It's a theorical limit, so it's unreacheable. Only the light can reach it.\n\nIf C is the speed of light, the fastest you can get is C*0.999999999... (insert as many '9' as you want). When you turn on the headlights, they will be somewhat faster: they'll reach the speed of light.