What's correct: "tying" a tie, or "knotting" a tie? Or neither?
152430
the correct phrase is tying the tie. and it works because you TIE a knot in the tie. just like tying your shoes.
590386
[title]\nI.[topic]\n  A.[subtopic]\n    1.detail\n    2.detail\n  B.[subtopic]\n    1.detail\n    2.detail\nII.[topic]\n  A.[subtopic]\n   1.detail\n   2.detail\n\n\n\nand just keep this pattern going till you nneed to stop.
760722
everything else is a single unit that is textured. Hair is multiple units that are relitively untextured. When you tie hair in a knot, not all of the hairs have something to pull against. When you tie a rope, the rope is caught by itself and stays, but the hairs in the middle fo the knot are really just being curled around a bit, but dont have anything to bite into to keep them like that, they just slide right past each other. a knot needs to lock around itself to stay and there are just too many hairs not doing that for you to be able to tie your hair up like that.
123397
It also depends on your height.  If you're taller than usual, like me, you might have to content yourself with half-Windsors or four-in-hand knots for most of your life, just because the extra fabric lost in tying a double will bring the tip of your tie more than a quarter of an inch above your belt buckle.  \n\nIf you CAN wear one, I'd use it when you have (as above) a thin silk tie, or for 'official' occasions - weddings, funerals, presentations to the board.  Job interviews and dates would likely perceive a double as being too stuffy.
368520
Sentence B\nThe verb "looks" is linkning, therfore its complement is either a predicate nominative or predicate adjective.
1071340
The correct answer is "as". This type of question is called an analogy.\n\nAnother and more popular example of one is:\n\nA glove is to hand as a shoe is to ________ (The answer is foot because the glove covers/protects the hand then the shoe must cover/protect whatever it is referring to.)\n\nI hope that made sense to you. If I figure out a better way to explain it let you know.
908134
Linking verbs do not express action.  They connect the subject of the verb to addittional info about the subject.  \nExample:  Ashley is a teacher.  Is connects the subject (Ashley) to the additional information about her.
719448
You can use either when adding a qualifying clause afterwards.\n\n"I like the cat which is red"  "I like the cat that is red" both work. \n\nThat sounds a little more casual/natural.  Which sounds a bit more high brow formal.  \n\nThat can also double as a pronoun.  Avoid using the word "that" twice in a row however.  "That which is wrong"  vs "That that is wrong."
555814
like 'tay-al'  or  'tie-al'
425082
Are you asking which term is grammatically proper? If so, both can be depending on the usage. But generally, we use the term head OR tail as we are usually referring to a choice of one side OR the other such as the simple gambling act of flipping a coin. But the way you have framed the question ("What are the two sides of a coin?") you are speaking of both sides at once so proper grammatical syntax would be head AND tail.\nConfused? Me too...
853193
well, I can speak for "cold"  \n\nIt comes from the root of the word, which is actually "cold condition."\n\nOne catches a "cold condition" rather than "catches cold condition"
175428
It looks like a typo (a typing mistake) to me. Is that the entire sentence, or is there more? If there's more to the sentence, then the word might be "best-connected."
653725
Neither is correct grammar. You could say:\n\nMy new website is a.b.com.\n\nIf you really want to keep your wording, you could probably do it like this:\n\nThis is my new website 'a.b.com'. or\nThis is my new website: a.b.com.
566319
either is acceptable..\n\nthough, if you would be using the sentence in theme papers.. or any formal writing..\n\nyou should use the second..\n\nthis is for the reason that when a number is present in a sentence..\n\nit is only appropriate that you affix the word "for"..\n\nexample...\n\nwe were trekking for four days (it wouldn't seem formal if you use "we were trekking four days")
568462
I have see both terms used on road plans, and have heard both spoken on various road projects.  Either seem to be correct.
18590
Normally I wouldn't just drop an URL and go, but this is a very complex question, assuming you are not looking for hypenation rules for those two specific words, rather than a more generalized sense of when and how to hyphenate compound words.  For some very detailed information on hyphenation and compound words in general, check the sources listed below.  My own personal rule of thumb, hyphenation is used more often than it should; when in doubt, avoid making hyphenated compounds "just because".  If the two words do not look right separate or joined (without a hyphen), then I will stick one in there.\n\nExamples of when hyphens come in handy include words like ex-girlfriend (ex girlfriend and exgirlfriend just don't look right), or when the combined words might be mistaken for a different word (re-sign a paper vs. resign a paper--the context may let the reader figure out the meaning, but it interrupts the natural flow).\n\n[edit: almost forgot, given the two examples above, I would put a hyphen in.  "High-quality investment" and "Lower-cost solution" would be correct based on the rules in the two sources quoted below.]
592847
I know a lot of knots, I've used them in all sorts of things from fishing, boating, climbing, rapelling, etc.  The blood knot is a good joining knot, but I use a figure 8 follow through.  It isn't that hard to tie, and it's really really strong.  (I trust my body to it when I climb, so it should be ok for 2 pieces of braided line).