structure of employees sheriff court scotland?
139123
The lower court in Scotland is the Sheriff Court. Each Sheriffdom (of which there are six) has a Sheriff Principal. There are 49 Sheriff Courts within the Sheriffdoms, with a judge, known as a Sheriff.\n\nThere are 3 legal areas within a Sheriff Court: Civil, Criminal and Commissary. The civil jurisdiction, though inferior, is extensive and the majority of civil cases raised in Scotland are taken in the Sheriff Court. There is an appeal from Sheriff to Sheriff Principal and to the Inner House of the Court of Session. An appeal may be taken to the Inner House directly. From the Inner House further appeal may be taken to the House of Lords. In criminal matters the Sheriff also has a wide jurisdiction in relation to most crimes; only those of greatest gravity lie outwith the Sheriff's jurisdiction. There is no appeal from Sheriff to Sheriff Principal in criminal cases, the appeal lies to the court of criminal appeal.\n\nThe superior court in Scotland is the Court of Session formed by the Inner House (comprising the first and second divisions) and the Outer House (where only single judges or Lords of Session also styled Senators of the College of Justice sit). The principal judge is the Lord President, who leads the first division, whereas the Lord Justice Clerk leads the second division. The court sits only at Parliament House in Edinburgh.\n\nThe highest civil appellate court is the House of Lords which sits in Westminster. The judges who sit in the House are the Lord Chancellor, the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary, and those peers who hold or have held high judicial office. The House of Lords has an appellate jurisdiction from Scottish courts in civil matters only; it has no Scottish criminal jurisdiction.
1184232
By what names are RMPS, RME and RE better known? \n\nAnyway, all the teaching jobs in Scotland are listed on http://www.tesjobs.co.uk. Click the "browse" link because the "search" link always makes my computer fall over.
723911
Try the UK court website HCMS.  They should be able to help you.
202853
The Federal Judiciary is broken dowm into 13 Circuits of Appeal. Within each Circuit, there are District Courts. See the map at http://www.uscourts.gov/courtlinks/ to get an idea of the breakdown. District Courts are the trial level courts in the federal system. District Court Judges oversee matters in District Courts.\n\nMany states also have District Courts. For example, there are nine Judicial DISTRICT COURTS in the State of Nevada. These are also trial level courts.\n\nSome states call their trial level courts by different names, like Superior Court. It just depends on the state.
398456
Yes, Judicial Watch has a website, it is: www.judicialwatch.org\n\nA list of Judicial Watch officers and staff members is available at this site: http://www.judicialwatch.org/staff.shtml
196329
its not called Scotland yard , \nits called the special branch
791880
Try the website of the place of incarcination oder the police / sheriffs department.
377584
http://www.sc.gov/Portal/Category/EMPLOYEERIGHTS
942114
You can find some info here: http://www.coursework4you.co.uk/sprtcasec211.htm
790740
yes we do have courts here and lots of them there called civil  county courts they handle civil cases such as claims against people like you and me, counter claims and business disputes such as insolvency or a company has not paid for goods recieved by a supplier but in extreme serious cases where breach in health and safety such as death or damage to property or the enviroment then the matter will be turned over to the crown courts were they can receive a higher sentence or fine you can find out how many companys are taken to court usually they offenders are printed in your local newspapers under business section or you can find out this information from the local county courts or visit the department of trade and industry
924738
Basically all courts have an usher and a clerk to the court.\nIt then depends on the court, in the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords up to 7 Law Lords can sit at one time to hear a case, normally it is 3 in the court of appeal.\n\nIn the crown court it is one judge\n\nMagistrates court will be a chairperson who is legally qualified and two lay magistrates from members of the public who are advised in law by the clerk to the court. The clerk to the magistrates will also be legally qualified.\n\nThere will also be a stenographer who will transcribe the proceedings as well as the proceedings being recorded.\n\nAs to the level of representation in these courts at the moment is under review. From crown court upwards solicitors do not have a right of audience which is why a barrister has to be instructed.\n\nConversly you can represent yourself, however without legal training it is not a good idea and in some cases it is frowned upon by the courts when defendants cross examine victims.\n\nHope this helps.
335904
Here is a link to the sheriff's office \n\nhttp://www.norfolksheriffsoffice.com/
884971
Try this site:\n\nhttp://sheriff.cuyahogacounty.us/corrections.asp
225130
There are data concerning jobs and careers from the local site:\n\nHarrogate Borough Council - Jobs and Careers\nhttp://www.harrogate.gov.uk/harrogate-195
981466
If you have complained to the sheriff and feel you have not gotten any help, the next person would be the county prosecutor. In the state that I worked the county prosecutor was the highest law enforcement person in the county. Good luck
1160964
your comment about the law lords coming up with laws with the help of their friends is complete bull. Law lords are simply the highest level of judge in the UK. They dont proactively make laws. Like the courts below them they must wait for a case to be brought before them, and then decide on the disputed points of law that would be in the best interest of the parties, and society. There is no doubting the intelligence and ability of our law lords. They are among the best in their profession, in the world, let alone in hte country. \n\nAs for a conspiracy in law, well, judges are very hard to remove. The circuit judges and above can only be removed due to infirmary (physically/ mentally unable to do the job) Retirement (age 70 or 80, i forget which) Resignation, and dismissal. Since the only way to dismiss a judge is for parliament to petition his removal (virtually pass a law to remove him) there really is no need for them to 'use the law to cover themselves' And in practice that wouldnt happen anyway. Albeit only one high level judge has EVER been dismissed and one low level (for smuggling drugs in his yacht) Besides, not wanting to amend parts of the law? hell they'll amend it as the public see fit if they want to get elected again. Just to point out how well the law has been used to 'protect' the government in their sleaze allegations. I think the only way for what i think you're suggesting to happen would be for one of the arms of state (montesquieus theory, The legislature, The executive and the judiciary) gains too much power. But then the other arms act as a check and balance to bring them back down to earth.\n\n\nNotyou311- The law lords are the top judges in the UK. The house of lords, whilst being a chamber of parliament, also houses the highest court in the land. They decide on only THE most socially important cases and are bound by no courts (except the European court of Justice but thats debateable). THe only thing stronger than the law coming out of hte house of lords is an act of parliament.\nHotirongirl- Nobody has absolute power. There is always a check and balance to cancel them out.
231395
Head Office\nMedway House\n98-99 Dixons Green Road, Dudley\nWest Midlands DY2 7DJ\n\nTelephone  01384 243665\nFax  01384 357752\nEmail:  langstonesociety@wwmail.co.uk \n\nThe above info you could have found out yourself by typing Langstone Society in the search facility.... ;-)\n\nThe web site isn't very exciting, and I'm not sure they post job vacancies on there.  Why not try the direct approach and write to the Human Resources Manager, enclosing a CV, telling them why you want to work there, and asking them whether they have any present vacancies; if not, would they please keep your information on file. Keep a copy of your letter and if you don't hear from them in 2 or 3 weeks, write again.  Keenness may provoke their curiosity.