which one should i get Mitsubishi evo8 or subaru STI?
150969
If u dont like modification, buy Subaru. \nIf u want more, buy evo8. \nI read, subaru only can reaches 550 HP in Prodrive Support, fully modified, but Evo8 in Rally Art can reaches 678 HP and If u want to use Mivec Engine, it can be more than 720 HP. It's up to u
58017
Short answer is yes but it will cost you about $2500 including labor. Depending on what model you have will depend on the laughter part. I had a '95 Si that was in great condition, but I was tired of getting spanked by newer American 4 bangers, so I bought a WRX. I could have added a turbo or supercharger but I didn't have the cash, I had the credit to buy a newer used car. You have to think about reliability though. Spend enough money to get good hardware and for god sakes have a reliable (with references) shop do the work and hopefully get a warranty, speaking of which, your factory warranty will probably be void. You would however have a kickass Honda, as long as it is not a 4 door. Then I guess you would have the ultimate sleeper...
977586
handling would go to the 240sx, its RWD and lite. How many FWD cars are known for good handling COMPARED to RWD. Speed is up to you depends on what you do or want, fwd = understeer/ tourqsteer= lame. Comfort well i dont know. I'm biased towards RWD...
196417
Eclipse: Base FWD model equipped with a 140 hp 2.0 L 16-valve DOHC Chrysler 420A engine \n\nEclipse RS: Equipment Upgraded FWD model equipped with a 140 hp 2.0 L 16-valve DOHC Chrysler 420A engine \n\nEclipse GS: Equipment upgraded FWD model equipped with a 140 hp 2.0 L 16-valve DOHC Chrysler 420A engine \n\nEclipse GS Spyder: Convertible FWD model equipped with a 141 hp 2.4l 16-valve SOHC Mitsubishi 4G64 engine \n\nEclipse GS-T: Hardtop FWD model equipped with a 210 hp turbocharged 2.0 L 16-valve DOHC Mitsubishi 4G63 engine \n\nEclipse GS-T Spyder: Convertible FWD model equipped with a 210 hp turbocharged 2.0 L 16-valve DOHC Mitsubishi 4G63 engine \n\nEclipse GSX: AWD model equipped with a 210 hp turbocharged 2.0 L 16-valve DOHC Mitsubishi 4G63 engine
99960
Here in my view are the pros and cons of each:\n\nAdding a custom turbo to the GS: pros: you can select the turbo, it doesn't have to be the stock GSX turbo, but you have a lot of good choices, for example the Mitsubishi TD05-16G or TD05-18G.  Cons: you will need bigger injectors, fuel pump, and engine management. I highly recommend custom dynotuning for safety and performance. Torque-steer: with FWD and additional torque, you will encounter significant torque steer. This shouldn't be a problem if you are aware of it, and drive carefully. You will probably need a new clutch to handle the additional power.\n\nGSX: pros: less torque steer due to AWD. Injectors and pump are already sufficient.  cons: AWD drivetrain will have more driveline loss of horsepower in exchange for better handling.
917121
Toyota will shake up the mix a bit, will be interesting to see how well they do.\n\nWith the car of tomarrow it wont matter what your drive all the cars will be the same.
314743
Depends on what you want, An evo offers "cheap" interior as opposed to the Subie STI.  The subie is more refined to drive then the Evo.  Still the evo is a great looking car, and the tuning ability are almost the same.  So, if I had a choice I would buy both and see which is the best.
255015
The SRT-4 has Fun factor written all over it! Fast from the factory and insanly fast when modded.Simple to mod,easy to maintain and fun to drive.\n\nThe Gt , big motor, V-8... nuff said.\nthrow a supercharger on that bad boy and call it a day!\n400HP!
279998
That depends on what you can afford. The M3 is awesome if you have the money, but you don't want to get in over your head. The 330ci is cheaper and still a great car.
490556
go with the one you can afford.  Remember this. To drive in love can be pleasant but the drivers seat can sometimes result in disaster when you don't know enough. Good luck and much wisdom.
361727
I couldn't agree more.  451 cubic inches of pure Mopar Muscle.  510 Hp 544 ft/lb of torque in my 68 Dodge Charger.  I wouldn't trade it for an Evo, Subaru, and definately not a honda.
109553
For the money, Audi definitly! I'm a bimmer fan myself but in terms of overall I would pick the audi because it performs better and I believe it has more aftermarket options available.
288236
The BMW is the superior car, but it depends on the venue. The all wheel drive of the RS6 will do better on fast open tracks and the rear wheel drive BMW will clean it's clock on short tight tracks.
411029
reliability and avalabilty of aftermarket parts -- > go for the honda\n\nreliability for aveo is questionable since it has its platfrom taken from daewoo.
567604
i would say pure drive as it has more control then the aero drive
219651
First of all, the Eclipse is NOT a eurpoean car. The Eclipse is made by Mitsubishi... in Japan. The Eclipse is an IMPORT not a EURO car.\n\nOnto the European cars..\nThe main european car companies (in my mind) tend to be the German companies: VW, BMW, Meredes-Benz, Porsche, Audi, etc.\nThe "best" German company, in my mind, is Porsche, because they are the cream of the crop. They are very comfortable, they have unparalleled braking power, and they certainly aren't slow...\nHowever, the most practical european car would most likely be the BMW 3 or 5 series. They have everything a person would want in a european car, without costing as much as a Porsche. They aren't in the same league, but they're semi-comparable.\n\nHope this helps!
127609
I would go with TYC.  But I'm not sure they even make those for your car.  You might want to go with HIDs.