The democrats are against the war, yet they couldn't care less about Saddam's murders, why?
155857
Because they're Democrats lol. But lets think... if we never went to war and a terror attack happend again.. who do you think would be the first to say "oh we should have done something in the first place?"... the Dems. but hey.. whatever lol
817424
I'm a Republican... The majority of the Democrats are morally wrong, and are all for that stuff....  Its almost like a sickness... They whine and stomp their feet about our soldiers being over in Iraq, fighting for our Country, and then they whine and stomp their feet for gay rights, etc.....Does that make sense..... Scary bunch of people, huh...
798066
Because the liberal media came up with some sort of "Bush Conspiracy," saying how he planned 9/11 and how he started the war because he's blood-thirsty and power-hungry.  What a load, I know.  What they fail to realize, though, is that the guys in Iraq opted to go.  There is no draft making them go.  They are patriotic Republicans (got that from the % that voted for Bush) that are out protecting their right to bad-mouth the president.  Instead of getting excited over every new death in Iraq so they can use that against the Bush administration, they should be praying for the solders and thanking them.  If it weren't for them, they'd be bashing Bush in Arabic.
586911
Amnesy International is a less biased source than President Bush, that is for certian. It is amazing that our control of this country has resulted in the deaths of thousands of civilians and we have a hard time understanding why people are so upset. We did finance Saddam, as we have done other dictators. It doesn't make it our fault that he did this to his people. I think it is just really interesting that our stated reason for going over there is that he attacked us. When that wasn't true we changed it to weapons of mass destruction. Well... that wasn't true either. Now it is presented as spreading democrarcy... hmmm... if our goal was to protect people from corrupt governments and spread democracy we would be in a lot of other countries...and we would be assisting countries that are starving. Kind of blows that out of the water doesn't it. I respect our troops deeply, that they would put their lives and destiny's on the line for us and I feel sad and distressed that we are not even being honest about why we are ending their lives as well as thousands of civilian lives that we don't talk about in the so called "liberal" media.
864259
No, they are not pro-democrat, they are anti-Bush.  Everything they believe comes from radical propaganda.  They dont understand American politics and what it means to be a Democrat or Republican.
1001294
Yeah I know whatcha mean, not to mention when Clinton bombed Yugoslavia we didn't have that many Republicans saying it was wrong.\n\nIn fact loads of Democrats and Republicans supported the Yugoslavia bombing but loads of the same Democrats that supported that oppose Bush bombing Iraq.\n\nHello why is it ok for Clinton to bomb and not Bush?
1134574
One, I'm not a "conservative sypathiser".  Two, you have already played your hand by identifying yourself with a majority which MUST mean that you are a Democrat or mistakenly believe that our country is a democracy.  Is your reliance on the "majority" necessary for you to formulate and justify your questions?\nThree, by placing restrictions on and making pre-judgements regarding the "truth" of Iraq, you show yourself to be intellectually dishonest.  \n\nHere are your three things, for what little regard you will pay to them:\n\nExempted food from unilateral trade sanctions and embargoes. \n\nSigned the LARGEST nuclear arms reduction in world history with Russia. \n\nCommitted US funds to purchase medicine for millions of men and women and children now suffering with AIDS in Africa\n\nFor the record, I am not a Republican.  I am a Libertarian.
739750
My brother is in Iraq as well as my brother in law, my cousin's husband and a few others that I know.  The democrats whine because that is what they know best.  They will change their values, morals, and their opinions with the wind if they think it well get them further on the political road to success.  At least our president sticks with his gut and doesn't allow the masses to compromise his dedication in protecting the people of this country.  And yes, the terrorists are very glad when a democrat is in office.  It means more freedom and less consequence for them to do what they want.
858931
most democrats voted for the war-now their memory seems to be failing.
575825
because the rich faggots want to make money off the wars. they don't give a damn if someone loved one is getting hurt or killed over there while they put their sorry asses in bed f****** their secretaries. all they care about is their money or their own kids who they worry about and not send in Iraq. speaking of it, u know that in all senators of the US Senate, there is onle one senator whose children r serving in Iraq. whenever you get time, bring that movie Fahrenheit 9/11 and watch it, trust me if you hate George Bush and people like him, you will want to kill him after watching the movie.
810157
The issue of Iraq is a hot button now and both parties are using it to help their cause in the election.  \n\nThe Democrats, are playing on the death toll numbers that are rising with the time that is spent in Iraq.  They are also spouting the high costs of the war to work it against the Republicans.\n\nThe Republicans are touting the future results that may or maynot happen because of the time and money (not to mention the lives) spent in Iraq. \n\nI am lost at the attitude of the American people concerning the war in Iraq.  If these people protesting the Iraq war were around during Pearl Harbor and World War II, I wonder would they be protesting that war too?  Have you seen any of the movies about WWII, they are just movies I know, but the horror and destruction that went on then are so much worse then what we see today.  The men lost in the battle for Iwo Jima far surpasses the total of men lost in the Iraq war, and the battle for Iwo Jima lasted some 30 days, not the years that the Iraq war has been going on.  I know one life lost is a waste, but does the American public really think that anyone is able to accomplish anything like what we want to have happen in the middle east without lives being lost and blood being shed?\n\nWake up to reality, the freedom and liberties that we all enjoy today came to us at a cost to our parents and their parents and their parents  and their parents and so on.  It was the cost of lives and blood and sacrifice, and not having people at home saying how bad a job the military is doing, or saying that people in the military are illiterate.  The generations befor us knew that whether they agreed as to what was going on or not, that part of winning the war was done back home by the support of everyone.
520333
I can find very little evidence that Republicans officially opposed Operation Desert Fox. Republicans normally support appropriate military action against American enemies. For example, Paul Wolfowitz supported military action against Iraq in 1998. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about Democrats.\n\nI suspect that the Republicans who opposed saw it as a typically half-cocked attempt by Bill Clinton to give the appearance of toughness as a distraction from his impeachment. It had little impact on Iraq or Al-Queda other  than to convince them of our lack of will. It is just one example of how his weakness and foreign policy ineptitude sowed the seeds for September 11.\n\nIt is also evidence that the Clinton Adminstration believed that Saddam Hussein had chemical weapons and was working with Al-Queda. These views were shared by the Bush administration when it came to office.
27555
First of all its not that so many people whom u know dont like Bush that counts. Its democracy. So the final numbers count. It's not just u and me in democracy, but including you and me.\n\nBut if you ask why did they support for Iraq war then I dont know answer, but it reasons to me perfectly that they supported Iraq war directly or indirectly.\n\nIf u look at the US politics, its so amazing that the whole congress passed the war bill on Iraq, and still some of them say they opposed it. Common, lets not change interpretations of Democracy.
563748
Because in their mind every death is a little more validation that their opinion was right.  And these sick people would rather be right than achieve a rebuilt Iraq.\n\nThey say that they "support the troops".  But they dont.  Their real message is at best: "We want you to come home safely, but we don't want you to accomplish anything over there" - thats not support.\n\nIf the troops have victory, they see Bush as having victory... but the bigger picture is that a FREE Iraq with a stable government is a victory for the Iraqi people and the entire world.\n\n>insert bushlied;oil;oilbuddies;wmds; halliburton;etc.. here.\n\nand ignore the dozen reasons listed in the iraq war resolution that passed 77-23.
752557
Good Point.  I think it is just because they care about their liberal agenda.  They truly don't care about anything else.  That's just my opinion.
420136
I wouldn't have it if they didn't want to kill us Americans, or at least those who are supposedly the moderate Muslims would come out against those who strap bombs on and kill innocent people.  But they are no where to be found.\n\nOh well, if we get a democrat as President I'm dipping all my bullets in pigs blood.
858903
no, it's just that liberals have so much in their party to deal with, by that i mean sub-divided special interest groups, and have no focus. it is obvious when you ask them about a plan to get out of iraq. while the president says" stay the course" over and over the democrats say " we need to change course". over and over with no clear alternative to bush. multiply this by 1000 and " thar ye gowe". lack of focus.