Does Niburu planet really exists?
149506
Not acording to astonomers only husters and con men are willing to sell you thats one in a book!
413808
A simplistic 'yes' or 'no' answer to the question of whether extra-terrestrial life exists is not likely to take us to any meaningful conclusion. Nor does a communal belief in the existence of extra-terrestrials lead us, as a race, anywhere closer to understanding the true nature of the universe and its myriad possibilities vis-a-vis the development of life within it. \n\nIt is also to be noted that believing in ET life is an entirely different thing from being successful in establishing their presence. Probabilistic calculations tell us that we would be fools to think of ourselves as the sole "living" beings in this universe. But, the observable universe, atleast as it is at the present moment and given the way we are looking at it, holds no clue of extraterrestrial life of any kind.\n(There's another but to this)But yes, belief in extraterrestrial life, backed by a mathematical understanding of the possibilities would definitely go towards refining our search methodologies. Thats if we are truly interested, and if there is imminent benefit in holding that interest. These are of course, entirely different topics.
57853
Actually there is no tenth planet. Although Pluto is an official planet, others objects of about the same size, or even slightly larger won't be officially recognized as planets.\n\nAn object would need to be much larger, say the size of Neptune to become and official 10th planet. And some astronomers think that should an object may be out there.
249386
Yes, I do believe that life does exist in the universe on other planets. its doesnt mean that life is there only on Earth n in our solar system of the STAR SUN.\nIf u c there r millions of stars in the universe and triliions of planets so there is a possibility to find a planet similar or exact as EARTH which has the same atmosphere or maybe the same gravitational field or perhaps the same solar system is repeated somewhere in the universe. Thanx\n\n\nLuqman Cheema\nIslamabad, Pakistan
792312
I'm sure there's a large chance element in it, but one idea for the pretty clearcut difference between the inner "terrestrial" planets and the rest is explained at the following link:\nhttp://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=246
216857
yes....just because it's unidentified doesn't make it extraterrestrial.
86735
Well... Pluto isn't exactly a planet... some people speculate it is... others don't. Yes, another one has been discovered a while ago... I think it was Planet Nebula or something... in the far away galaxy of Cygnus (the constellation that resembles a goose)... You are talking about our solar system... right? I thought as much. In our solar system... there'd be 8 or 9, depending if you call Pluto a planet or not.\n\nEDIT: OK... there was one mass that could be considered a planet found in our solar system. It was called Ceres or something... found between Mars and Jupiter. Pluto may be an asteroid!
89758
Planet X did not exist.It was a possiblity for a few years,but we now know it is not.It could not hit us anyway.When the sun eventually condenses into a tiny ball,the closest planets will be sucked into it by its gravity.So,if it was getting sucked in too,which it would not,it would not get there in time.They did recently discover a new planet however.Its name is Sedna.
392780
We are told that the universe is, effectively , infinitely large. We are also told that the universe contains an indeterminate number of planets, also effectively an infinite number.\n\nIf you now consider the probability of something (anything) occurring. How about I give you odds of 100 million to one on their being alien life forms somewhere out there?\n\nNow, that's pretty remote odds, but if you consider that there are an infinite number of chances of it occurring, suddenly you have to consider those odds not remote,but pretty much a certainty!
766964
http://www.iau.org\nhttp://www.iau.org/fileadmin/content/pdfs/Resolution_GA26-5-6.pdf\n\non 24 august 2006, the international astronomical union reclassified pluto.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto\n\npluto does orbit the sun, is ball-shaped and is not a satellite, but it does not have an isolated orbit (a bunch of other similar bodies have similar orbits.) so it is not a planet.\n\ni have been waiting for this since i was about ten when i learned that pluto didn't fit the pattern set by the major bodies in the solar system so it was an anomaly. it just felt "out of place". now that astronomers have found hundreds of other bodies with similar orbits, classifying "134340 pluto" as a planet is even more irrational. i feel somewhat satisfied, but i don't know how long this will drag on tho. many planetary astronomers are satisfied that the definition is rigorous enuf. i can accept that the definition is flawed, but i can not accept that "134340 pluto" is a planet.\n\nthis was the right thing to do, believe me. this does not change anything about pluto or the solar system. this just corrects the mistake of classifying pluto as a planet initially.\n\nthis same thing happened has happened before.  in 1800, an astronomer found a body orbiting between the orbits of mars and jupiter and thought it was a planet.  astronomers finally stopped classifying them as planets after they found several other bodies with similar orbits, and no one thinks ceres, pallas, juno, and vesta are planets today.\n\nmany astronomers consider pluto and charon to be a binary system, but two small bodies orbit that system. they are called nix and hydra.\n\nincidentally, "134340 pluto" was never a moon of neptune. neptune did capture triton. this is why triton has a retrograde orbit
43083
Yes, it is entirely possible that there could be planets in other galaxies with life on them. There is nothing preventing the same conditions on our world being found on another world. It doesn't matter what people think about "aliens visiting our planet" or whether we can know about life out there. It definitely is possible.\n\nAs for the comment from Iamtheweasel: The bible doesn't say that you exist, but there you are! I don't mean to be rude, but does the Bible really have to say everything explicitly for it to be true, or even probable? It absolutely does not contradict that there is life on other worlds. From a fellow Christian, please don't be so closed-minded, especially by using a "No true Scotsman" fallacy of definition to define a Christian as one who doesn't think it's probable that there is life on other worlds.
141708
Yes. It's actually in our own solar system.  Whether it is a planet or not is the real question.  It is really small.  While bigger than pluto, it is still smaller than the Earth's moon!
783382
no the fourth planet from the sun.put me on best answer please!\n\nHappy Trails ♥!
838820
Hi. I do not think so. It may be possible that life forms unimagined may exist (I'd be surprised if they didn't) but they would still need to be based on something other than vacuum.
57670
According to Wikipedia, the official designation of this "planet" is 2003 UB313.  Its discoverers claim that it is definitely larger than Pluto, and that it has at least one moon.\n\nThe name is not actually Xena, and this is simply a codename used by the discoverers, and has not been submitted to the International Astronomical Union for consideration as a real name for the planet.\n\nIt's roughly 20 percent larger than Pluto, I guess.  They can't disclose the name that they will be proposing for the planet.\n\nThere is a re-definition of the term "planet" going on right now by the IAU, so it is possible that this will turn out not to be considered an actual planet.\n\nMore info here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_UB313
1068613
the magical composition for a planet to have life on has extraordinary complexity therefor life as we know it in the millions of planets we know so far about is almost impossible but not impossible . perhaps life does exist but not in the way we would expect or could possibly think of . lets not forget that even when we have been for so long in this planet it continues to amaze us , so translating that to the universe i think is just a matter of time before find what we less expected in the most unusual ways .
1178690
Right now the international convention in astronomy is debating on how a planet is defined... Pluto appears to be just one of the thousands of objects in the Kuiper belt which is believed to contain objects more massive than Pluto, 2003 ub313 is one prime example and is classified as a Trans-Neptunian object... I have already debated this topic with all the other webdatedotcom friends I have and the arguments are pretty interesting..