Who do you agree more with:  Hannity or Colmes?
147554
HANNITY ALL THE WAY!  Love the way he raises money for the funding of the college education for the children of the troops.  Just because he refused ONE benefit that Moore accepted doesn't mean he doesn't donate time and money (look at all Moore takes in from  his other talks and  edited movies and donations).  Perhaps it was a known fact to Hannity that Moore was more welcome and he, like many other conservatives, would have had something thrown at him by students who are often brainwashed by their liberal professors. However, we should keep in mind that BOTH, first and foremost, are personalities.  And, frankly, slovenly people like Moore aren't my type.  There are lots of little (or should I say EXTRA XXXXXXXL) stories about Moore, too.  At the antiwar (rather anti-everything) demonstration in NYC, Moore had to stop at some Mexican place and rest for an hour eating tacos while the others ate their bagged lunches and kept marching.  I guess most of us admire those who share qualities familiar to us.  Frankly, I'll take the intelligent guy with the looks over the obese loudmouth anytime (or the guy with the light bulb-shaped head who makes little sense to me, Colmes).  Brains and good looks make such a nice combination.\n\n*Someone here sounds so familiar*  *Rolls her eyes*
423076
Once again the right wing asserts as truth something that is not, then acts on that "truth" to bring things more to their way of thinking. They claim that mainstream media is liberal, therefore they need to be blatantly conservative to offset the media bias. They ignore the vast conservative ownership and control of much of the media, ignore the proud tradition of the press being critical of whatever government is in power, and point only to the   majority of reporters as "liberal." Maybe so, but nothing on tv compares remotely to the blatant drumbeat of the GOP talking points on Fox.\nFox so completely contaminates their news with their political bias, that anyone who has the sense to get a broad picture of the issues can only be shocked by Fox's one-sidedness. \nFair and balanced is a claim similar to Bush's of being a uniter. Sure.
487256
Your details lead me to believe that you don't actually listen to Air America.  I split the afternoon between Hannity and Rhandi Rhodes.  Sometimes I even throw Rush in the mix, though I much prefer Al Franken.  I get both sides and usually the Air America side is fair.  They speak the truth, whether it be a Democrat or a Republican that is making news.
360989
Fox News Network on T.V.\n\nTalk Radio:\nLarry Elder\nBill O'Riley\nShawn Hannity\nJohn & Ken
800220
Savage is a bit "edgy"... Hannity is good, an interviewer, and advocate of conservative values.... Limbaugh is the grand daddy of em all, he is a teacher, a proselytizer of conservatism. \nActually I like Glenn Beck best of all... his "fusion of entertainment and enlightenment" is a good balance. He tries to explain right and wrong rather than left and right or Republican and Democratic. He also is one of the few that "gets it" in regard to the Islamic Jihadist. He understands the danger that not only the US is in but the whole world is in from them.
432268
I disagree about Coulter and Hannity. Oh they are good at lying and spinning, but they are not in Limbaugh's league. No, the only guy out there who can tell a bald-faced lie with as much in-your-face bravado as Druggy Limpboy is Bill O'Reilly.
496395
haha, did u get that from Colbert?\n"Great president or the greatest president?"\nI'd go with the Biggest Scumbag :)
1187902
I think that each side responds to the other...but who is to say who started it?  Surely it has been going on long before Hannity and Moore...et al.  You think Rush and the like are "out there"...I can only speak about Rush, he is the only one I listen to with any regularity..and even him is about twice a month or so...but he substantiates what he says, and backs it up with fact..and if you look it up, you find he is correct....\nI think it goes too far most of the time, and people end up bickering about superficial things, and lose sight of the ultimate goal, to make this country the best it can...and to do this requires more than one side...more than one viewpoint.
758604
Hannity!\n\nWait... no no no....... Fred Phelps.  Wouldn't THAT just take the cake?
1018110
Michael Moore, Dan Rather, the New York Times. \n\nThree of the pipers on the left, all proven liars!!
475222
hahaha\nNO to both of em buddy. Lou Dobbs is completely right biased, but the great thing about him is that he doesnt hide it like others do. Hes all in your face about it. Even though I dont agree with him at all, I still respect him. Let me tell you something, there is no such thing as unbiased news in the world today. Everything is slanted, its just a question of proportion...Fox slants very far, CNN slants but not as much as Fox, NBC slants nicely but still not as much as Fox. Point is, if you want good unbiased news, watch the Daily Show with John Stewart on comedy central. He makes fun of everybody...Totally unbiased\n\n\npeace\n\n\n\nAddition: No kiddin Stewarts a liberal. But if you ever take the time to watch his show, he makes fun of the liberals just as much as he does the conservatives. Thats what I like so much about him, hes picked a side, but he can make fun of his own side as well as the other side when they mess something up. You know?
972136
I seem to recall Rush Limbaugh referring to Arlen Specter as a "RINO"... meaning, Republican In Name Only.  Hope that clears it up for you.\n\nPS: I did get to read the transcript of his comments about Fox, it didn't say anything about Fox directly, he pointed to a commercial done for Michael Steele (who's running for senate in Maryland) who's sister (who has MS) was concerned about how Fox portrayed Cardin (who is also running for senate) verses Steele. Basically, Steele supports stem cell research and Fox came off as if Cardin did and Steele didn't... I just haven't been able to find the Fox commercial to judge for myself.
1002032
I'm assuming you mean extreme left and extreme right. \nSome examples:\nExtreme left- Michael Moore - distorts facts to make money and advance his personal agenda\nExtreme right- Ann Coulter - distorts facts to make money and advance her personal agenda\nThe only difference is the agenda.\ndixierock: How about Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, and Pat Robertson (you know, the man of God who calls for people to be murdered?). Do you need more or will 3 do?
1047741
can't argue with having one less liberal in the media
702205
Tough one.\n\nI do not like Ann Coulter, she thinks her sh_t does not stink. Every bodies sh_t stinks.\n\nDon't know that much about Nancy yet.
937145
Hannity ?\n\nOh no....I'm supposed to be celebrating....not vomiting.
1010215
a folk tale used by republicans. the number one rated news channel is fox news(conservative), number one tv show (bill o'reily-republican) and radio show sean hannity (conservative nut). doesn't sound liberal to me.