what is the children's rights charter?
147257
can u add in details what does it mean? I will put this on my watchlist and hope that you will add some details too it. If it is too complicated stuff, I m afraid I can't do it bcuz I m a student.
905116
I am assuming that you are asking about Kevin and Jared’s Law (Child and Family Services Statute Law ...The short title of this Act is Kevin and Jared’s Law (Child and Family Services Statute Law Amendment), 2006. \n\nThe following material from Toronto Sun answers your question:\n\nTrouble is, it was never proclaimed -- not by the Tories and not by the Liberals since they came to power, even though it was the brainchild of one of their own. Amazingly, some youth outreach groups oppose the law as too "draconian" -- because, hey, why shouldn't a 14-year-old have the right to sell her body for cash? \n\nSo, Queen's Park has a bit of a sorry record when it comes to following through on private member's bills designed to help children. Supporters of Kevin and Jared's Law are aware of this and are urging everyone to keep pushing their MPPs until they set a date for royal assent and proclamation of Bill 89. \n\nGood plan. But while we're at it, let's push them to do the same for Bill 86. Both are about protecting kids from abuse. Neither one does any good if it just sits on a shelf.
964982
What rights?\nThey don't have any, and if they do something really stupid, the legal system declares them adults.  NO justice!
1110728
give them their rights
1161656
It is Britain\n\nThere is no written constitution or comprehensive Bill of Rights; Britain's constitution is to be found partly in conventions and customs and partly in statute. The Act known as the Bill of Rights 1689 deals with the exercise of the royal prerogative and succession to the Crown.\nThe British legal system provides some remedies to deal with human rights abuses. For instance, the remedy of 'habeas corpus' secures the individual's right to freedom from any unlawful or arbitrary detention.\nParliament, however, has power to enact any law and change any previous law.\nThere is no fundamental distinction between 'public law' and 'private law'. Any person can take proceedings against the Government or a local government authority to protect his or her legal rights and to obtain a remedy for any injury suffered.\nBritain has not generally codified its law and courts adopt a relatively strict and literal approach to the interpretation of statutes. The ratification of a treaty or international convention does not make it automatically part of the domestic law. Where necessary, the Government amends domestic law to bring it in line with the convention. Because of Britain's membership of the European Community, Community law is part of British law and takes precedence in the event of conflict between the two.
583808
Here are a few sites that might help you:\n\nhttp://soc.enotes.com/child-labor-article\n\nhttp://www.ilstu.edu/~jnassar/child.html\n\nhttp://www.earlham.edu/~pols/globalprobs/children/Amye.html\n\nhttp://www.empereur.com/DOC/Child_Labor.html
797935
They are all Human Rights. Human Rights are the basic rights given to individuals irrespective of his sex, race, nationality, caste, color, etc.
32194
Kids theoretcially have the same rights, but as minors can still be told to what to do by adults so it might not always seem like they have equal rights.
845559
To advise the child on legal and court matters.
887235
Amazing, isn't it, how many rights get stolen all in the name of 'for the children'. Considering that public school teachers unions are heavily Democrat, one wonders why they'd seek to invade the privacy and rights of the students in this manner.\n\nWatch out for do-gooders who do things 'for the children' or 'for your own good' - they will casually toss aside your rights for their cause.\n\n"The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience."  Albert Camus
873069
hi vinay\ni'm 4m hyd, and im in CBSE too\ni chose human rights\n1) i spoke about definitions and history of rights --- INTRODUCTION\n2) talk about human rights organisation like the UNHRs, ASEAN, and others --- GOOGLE it\n3) talk about human rights charters like the UNDHR, the Aisan charter, the Human Rights Act (India) --- --- GOOGLE and http://www.nhrc.nic.in/\n4) Human rights violations: use the many case studies in the NHRC website above\n5) discuss apartheid --- wikipedia\n6) talk about nelson mandela and martin luther king jr\n7) discuss human rights violations under Indira Gnadhi\n8) use facts and figures from the Amnesty website http://www.amnesty.org/\n9) CONCLUSION --- write about world human rights day\n10) n u could also create a comparison between China and US in human rights\n\nmail me 4 more
810059
Rights of the people.
270816
I would in this case focus on the origins of "Human Rights". The Human Rights issue at the UN didn't come up that simple. The person who brought this issue up first was the wife of the US president, Mrs Eleanor Roosevelt.\n\nI would advise to check out the following links, to get information for your tesis.\n\nOther possiblities/information you can find at the Un or Amnesty.\n\nYou can write about:\n- children rights\n- human rights in general\n- president roosevelt, his wife and human rights
232088
Not in the constitution. However, Article 20 of the US Code covers the topic of requiring an education to children through grade 12.\n\nRegarding non citizens, you cannot forbit them from attending. US Code, Title 20, CHAPTER 39, SUBCHAPTER I, Part 2,  § 1703\nlink: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode20/usc_sec_20_00001703----000-.html\n\n(Whether that pertains to undocumented aliens is up for debate)
181106
see:\nhttp://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
66089
they had the same rights they have now except now adults are coddling little "tyler" and "britney" and it just appears they have more rights when in fact little has changed except parents and other adults wanting to make everything "safe" and they are actually making their kids weak both in body(obesity) and spirit. If some group wants something done in just their way it's always " for the children". Kid's rights haven't changed but the explotation of their innocence and the fear it can instill in parents so that parents will support whatever some special interest group has in mind is about all that has canged there was time people would never have sunk so low.
892445
The United Nations' Universal declaration of Human rights contains that passage.\nhttp://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html