How do I describe a mile without using numbers?
142818
A mile is any of several units of distance, or, in physics terminology, of length: nautical mile, sea mile, an ancient Roman unit of length...\nOr you could just say: the distance from my place to school, or smth like that.:-D
87760
Miles: 1494.18 \nKilometers: 2404.58
49698
your variable m stays for "miles".\nYou thus just have to put 295 instead of m and do the exact reckoning: 0.05*295 + 30  14.75 + 30 = 44.75\n\nNow choose from the options the one which is closest to your number: 45\n\nIn this way you cannot do wrong
579272
40 m/h.  you do not need to know the distance.
362603
mi is miles, it is written like that to distinguish it from meters which is written as m
1124931
If it is fairly new it is probably 400 meters, but it used to be 1/4 mile. There isn't much difference, but it is a lot if you are training for a mile run.
232907
I would reword it as this:\n\nHowever, I am not good at math.\n\nHope this helps!
455277
About 3.1 miles, but you can look this up easily in Google. Just type "5 km in miles".  You can do all sorts of conversions this way.
403577
You have miles per minutes, and you want to convert it to miles per hour.  Set it up as fractions so the units cancel out, like this:\n\n1mile/8minutes * 60minutes/1hour  Now the minutes cancel and miles/hour is the final units.  Now just do the math.  60/8 = 7.5 mph.
249142
Use the digits unless it's the first word of a sentence.  You should never start a sentence with a numeral, but otherwise the general rule is you should only write out numbers smaller than ten (I usually write out other numbers too, though).  Also, don't write out numbers that have units attached even if they're smaller than ten.
154711
1 mile is ~ 1.609344 kilometers\ntherefore\n16 miles is ~ 25.749504 kilometers
1099729
1 mile = 1.609344 kilometers
926427
1 mile = 1.60934 km\n\n... which is the same thing as saying\n1 km = 0.621371 miles\n\nHence (27 km) x (0.621371 mile/km) = 16.7770 miles\nand (6.4km) x (0.621371 mile/km) = 3.9768 miles
736136
6.6_ miles (the _ means repeating).\n\nhttp://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=10*%282%2F3%29&btnG=Google+Search&meta=
45820
By my calculations, if you divide 14.45 by 3, it will get you 4.82 miles per half a mile. You then multiply that by 2 which would get you approximately 9.63. So therefore, you should run about 9.63 miles per hour without any breaks. In a simpler way, 14.45 divided by 1.5.
931765
1. d=t, any form of d=t+b would be parallel. b = any number. That is a line.\n\n2. d=t would also work here.\n\n3. Well if you go 60 MPH and you wnat to know how many miles a minute you can go convert using (60miles/hour)*(1hour/60minutes) and you get 1mile/minute. If you need feet, 1 mile is 5280 feet, so 5280 feet/minute
732382
5280\n\n\n"in Old England, the mile - derived from the Roman "mille \npassus" or 1000 double steps - was originally 5000 feet long as in the \nRoman definition (1 "passus" = 5 feet). Later, it took 5280 feet to \naccommodate exactly 8 furlongs, the most popular measure of the time.\n\nActually, the usual happened: the foot and the rod went slowly their\nseparate ways, being used by different industries (the weaver and the \nfarmer ....) Things had to be straightened up and, as the foot and the \nrod were already entrenched, we find these strange figures: 16.5 ft/rod \nand 5280 ft/mile. This was voted by the House under Queen Elizabeth I \nin 1595.\n\nIt should be noted that the furlong comes from the Greek and Roman \nstadion, which they themselves inherited from more ancient times. It \nseems to be the optimal length for the traditional plough.\n\nThe rod was determined by lining up 16 men (after the Sunday Service, \nthe story goes) and measuring the combined length of all their left \nfeet. These 16 feet make up 16.5 "feet." Thickness of the shoes? Gaps \nbetween feet? This is tradition ...."