Why US-american thinks that Bill Clinton is "best" liar vs J.W.B.?
146351
Clinton was far more articulate. His lies actually made you think 'maybe he telling the truth'. I assume that because he was a lawyer and thats what they do best. Bush has a Business degree. Thats why he always seems to be trying to 'sell' us something.
61207
This is kind of a lopp sided question as it is always easier to complain about whatever we currently have.  However in this case the answer would be George W. Bush.  I have read some of the answers that you have gotten and some are based on complete misconceptions.  Yes our economy was better under the Clinton Administration, however that was due to the fact that the things that Reagan did for the economy were finally bearing fruit.  By the end of the Clinton years we were back into recession that plagued the early Bush Administration.  Clinton campaigned in 1992 promising National Health Insurance, however in his 8 years as President was not even able to get it to the floor of Congress.  Clinton had Congress's approval for the same reasons as Bush did in 1998 to go to war with Iraq, yet he never followed through with it.  If we blame Bush for making mistakes in his reasons for going to war with Iraq, Congress and the President made the same mistake in 1998.  What seems to be a common thing for both the American Public as well as our Politicians is a short attention span and a short memory.  In retrospect most Americans now think of Nixon as being a good President as well as a great statesman, yet in 1974 he was the most hated man in history moving Hitler to number 2 for the first time in over thirty years.
549584
In retrospect, Clinton was one of the better presidents the United States has had. Setting his personal life aside, he managed to bring our financial house in order after years of mismanagement by Reagan and Bush.\n\nClinton was responsible about the use of US military power globally. He got rid of Slobodan Milosevic, and actually did attempt to take down bin Laden.\n\nHis trade policies were based on flawed assumptions, and cost the US hundreds of thousands of jobs, but I can't see a Republican being better.\n\nBill Clinton had his flaws, but he is light years ahead of the guy in the White House now.
58612
It was an attempted impeachment by The House of Reps.  Clinton was NOT impeached from his position as President of the United States.\n\nMy, my JETDOC, must be you haven't met up with Monica ;)  Maybe you should.  Your tongue...no, your type is sarcastic and undeserved, maybe such a release would loosen your stiffness some ;).  Must be a BUSH fan =)).  My thought is lying about a little oral sodomy does not compare to what BUSH has done to this country with his continued lies.  Such a comparison of lies..I still know who I'd choose...nothing like the smell of a sweet cigar!\n\njl_jack09, my apology for responding to JETDOC in your space...and I stand corrected by the happy man for my error in understanding.\n\nxo
769516
Clinton was a pervert/womanizer but JFK was a superior person.  Dude if you lookup pervert womanizer in the dictionary there is a picture of JFK. \n\nYour assertion has no validity.  Fact is required in a debate not personal opinion, just because you like someone or not does not make them superior or inferior.\n\nHowever I agree with your assertion to a point but would not hold JFK as your example (Reagan is a far better example of a quality president).  Party politics will almost certainly endanger the likelihood of a person of substance serving in the high office.\n\nAlthough I give to you Rudy Guiliani '08.  He is a man of substance.
360673
Yeah, Clinton was an idiot. He received intelligence which hinted at plans for the 9/11 attacks, but did nothing. If Clinton wasn't busy having affairs and lying to American people during his presidency, our current situation may have been alot different.
408973
Bush is definitly a much better president\n\nThere were more scandals during clinton's presidency then any others.  The head of FBI during clinton's presidency gave back his confidential access to the white house because he didn't want to be considered part of one of the scandals.  he spent more time investigating the white house the doing anything else during his eight years\n\nI won't even touch most of the things that went on but i do have to mention his affair
139405
I always enjoyed reading about Truman. Common man thrown into an uncommon situation with only his street wits to guide him. Plus, I have his rookie card authographed.\n\nBut then again, with the chimp in the white house, it makes me realize how good we had it under Clinton. So, indirectly, GWB comes in second.
325740
Let's get real, WE ALL LIE SOONER OR LATER THERE HON. ...... I bet his name is Bill Clinton.
1525
It's entirely a matter of preference and opinion. \n\nWith that said: Bill Clinton. :)
507638
bill clinton.\n\nextreme fraud.
716561
Lying under oath is why Clinton got impeached.  Apparently, lying about getting head is more treasonous and dangerous to the United States than lying about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
524035
(God, I wish that were true!)\n\nClinton!  Clinton!  Clinton!  Cause I don't like wimpy, ignorant, coke heads who can't even PRONOUNCE the names of foreign countries running mine!
321040
President Bush is complete lier, and a threat to the American people with his crazy lets go bomb every body attitude. I don't appreciate the Bush administration inflation policy with the over printing of U.S. currency and spreading it outside of the United States of America. Our deficit is triple and the highest of any former President, as a matter of fact, the Economist say it's as much as all the other American Presidents, all put together. Lying to America to gain access to another Country without a declaration of war, and the approval of the United Nations. No Osama Bin Laden, Saddam has been in custody for over 2 1/2 years, and Iraq doesn't have Government except for the U.S. Military. Allowing Exxon Mobil of Texas to profit 340 billion dollars for 2005. The Patriot Act is a piece of toilet paper the takes my civil rights away according to the Bill of Rights and the Constitution of the United States. George Bush has another bill on the block to take some more of my rights away, called the Constitution Restoration Act, that was written by Pat Robinson & Jerry Falwell, and the dirty tricks team. The man is a criminal to the United States of America and we want him impeached and imprisioned for his crimes to the U.S.A..
1043430
i dont think wanting american soldiers to come home to america is unpatriotic. neither is wanting a president to tell the truth to his citizens (and someone is going to talk about clinton here, YES, clinton lied, but he lied about his own penis, NOT about foreign "nucular" weapons). and jesse jackson......... wasnt he busted for cheating on his wife a few years back? \n\nthat said, i think they hate Bush the most.\n\nwhy do "conservatives" hate ppl that make less than $200,000 a year? why do they hate everyone BUT the ppl in your question?
176651
How can one know the answer to some hypothetical question whose answer is somewhere in the future.  History has not judged George W. Bush yet as he is still President.  What we have here is just a lot of people here you either think everything he does is wrong and those that give him their support right or wrong.  None of this will go very far in the judgment History will have on the man.  Each President has highs and lows in their popularity, which also goes nowhere in history actually judging the merits of his programs.  There are those who believe that Hilary Clinton would be far superior of a President that Bush however that is just polls as well and have no basis in fact for the way people feel.  If in fact Hilary would be elected she would also be judged by history after her term(s) and then you could compare the two, but you can not have anything but an opinion now, not facts.
565947
It's the excuse they use to hide his incompetence... everything is the fault of the "liberal media" or Clinton (who hasn't been in office for 6 years)\n\nAnyone who says "liberal media" has no idea what the word "bias" means or has no idea about politics what so ever...