What does a "point " have in common with the notion of "god "?
149483
A point has no hight, width, or length, so technically its hard to comprehend that it is there.  However, for mathematical completeness, we know that it must be there.  God is something that is hard to see, but most of us know He must be there.
551311
God is a Spirituality Utility Vehicle.\n\n(sorry, I could not resist - no I am not religious, it was just to much to resist)
735633
God does not have a "meaning" in the sense that you are asking. Your question is asked in a way to say "what is the human perception of God." While God can be perceived in many different ways by people, He is still seperate and distinct from them. His "meaning" comes from who He is. He is Holy, Just, Righteous, Faithful, Vengeful, Loving, Kind, Merciful, True, etc. These facts are known through His inspired word, the Bible. Through people, God wrote the Bible in order to display who He is, to us.
764514
.    The concept of God the Absolute includes all . Time , space and beyond. All realities are found therein . Error , evil , sin , and iniquity are unreal and are lost in the totality of reality.
357565
God is my supporter, My Source, Love, and Life. God is the God and the Goddess and all the facets in between. God is you and me expressing to our fullest. God is All there is.
15400
hahahhaha funny... in fact yes, God is everywhere by a X-sense He has... and also in that relations angels or mom's could be considered spy of God :)))
44902
God. (cheating) This explanation is what everyone eventually resorts to when the other answers fail. Now, before I go any further, I should make clear that I'm not talking about any of the gods defined in various religions. Throughout all of human history, we've been trying to explain existence. But nobody has ever succeeded. And it's likely that nobody ever will. So we create the concept of God, whose only necessary property is being "that which explains existence." \n\nThis doesn't tell us much about god, though. It doesn't mean that any particular religion is correct. It merely defines god as something which answers The Question, because we have not been able to.
868548
A spatial point is an entity with a location in space but no extent (volume, area or length). In geometry, a point therefore captures the notion of location; no further information is captured. Points are used in the basic language of geometry, physics, vector graphics (both 2d and 3d), and many other fields. In mathematics generally, any form of space is considered as made up of points as basic elements.
915923
None. \n\nTHERE IS NO PROOF THAT GOD DOES NOT EXIST.  \n\nBut there is evidence EVERYWHERE that He DOES exist. \nWe see God in all that there is. There is evidence of him in all cultures. Some differ on who and what He his. But throughout history man of all ages and all cultures acknowledge a god. \n\nOne may not agree with all the natural things that point to God, all the history that points to God, all the people that point to God.....yet, and still, there is at least SOME evidence in these things to ANYONE that there is a god.\n\nWhen you weigh both sides, it  takes a fool to not believe in God.\n\nVirtually all our great leaders and presidents alike acknowleged God.  Our forefathers and foremothers, even the immediate fathers and mothers of of those that don't even believe in God; they believe(d) in God. \n\nConsider all the religeous scholars throughout the ages even unto this day, all the songs and hymns that have been written concerning God, etc. We could go on and on.  They don't all agree on many principles, but, they ALL agree that He is.  Somehow, all of these people are nuts and a few dim souls with enough free time to float around on Yahoo for several hours a day think they KNOW that God does not exist! I THINK NOT.  \n\nOne thing is for sure, some of them, before they die will come crawling to the God they denied;  the others will die wishing they had.\n\nIf we that believe in God are fools; then let it  be known that their ancestors, even mothers and fathers where even bigger fools.  Many of those that lived and died before us where fools.  Because they also believed.  But praise be unto God; they where not.\n\n"believe there's no proof"  . vs.  "believe the written testamonies and evidence everywhere"\n\nIt's a persons choice, but it takes a BONAFIDE FOOL to side with "no proof".\n\nThere is no "burden of proof" on anyone that believes in God to prove it to ones that do not believe in Him. The belief in God is ones OWN burden. Everyone only has their own burden to decide to believe or not to believe. \n\nI have no responsibility to prove Gods existence to anyone. Neither does anyone else have that responsibility.\n\n\nPeace
1001683
D and E. A bit of a contradiction, true. Cognito ergo sum. I think therefore I exist. Man thinks of God, therefore he exists. Which points to the fact that if the God is a product of man, then the supposed God of (A) does not exist. Therefore I motion that a god, or gods, do not exist at all. How can a god exist and de-exist, through the thought of man? Logic101. My weak point in college, but a great tool in regards to faith, religion, and gods.
644850
As a liberal minister, I think God is a figurative term. When nature hurts us, we(the God) get mad . We (God) assume that we(God) are punishing ourselves because of our own perceived shortcomings.
589979
I'm seeing this a lot lately. People mistake an issue of semantics for an issue of faith.\n\nThe fact is that "god," "God," "G-d," "GOD," or however you want to spell it has an agreed upon definition as a supernatural entity. Money is not "god," or "a god." Neither is pride, the big bang, luck, stars, or the Earth.\n\nNow, all atheists and agnostics have things that are important to them, but these things are not their "gods."\n\nUnderstand?
1051438
In both a scientific and theological sense, God can be defined as the origin of premise, which means he/she/it is the breakdown of causeality, the effect without a preceeding cause.  This, in effect, is not a governor of rules, but the rules themselves.  By this deduction, if there are other dimentions, God must exist in them or else they would have no rules and therefore not exist.
570553
What's the differance? They all point to the same God..
940924
I like your logic, and I agree.  I believe all gods are one God, just different names/aspects.  The supreme ruler is an IMMENSE being, and mere humans with our human brains cannot possibly interpret the whole thing as it is.  So we look at aspects of the supreme being.  I see one part, and you see another part.  But we're seeing the same Being.
591598
God is the ultimate nature of reality.  God is the guarantor of all meaning.  According to Spinoza, God is even you and me and the universe itself.  God is the source of truth, beauty and goodness.  Augustine said there was a God shaped hole in the heart of man. (Or was that C.S. Lewis?)
1037940
Actually, many Atheists agree with you and use this to claim with 100% certainty that no Gods exist. From this, they conclude that the definition of God is incoherent and has no definition. Something that cannot be defined cannot be claimed to exist as it has no conditional to be true or false.\n\nThis is called the Argument from Theological Noncognitivism.\n\nPersonally, I define a deity as being a supernatural, anthropomorphic entity that created the universe.