Did you vote for Bush?
138676
No. I didn't vote for Cheney's monkey on a string. If he is the lesser of two evils, what would the other guy have done? When you've bankrupted the country, raped the environment, taken away the people's rights and freedoms, lied to your citizens so you can masacre foreign countries, started a civil war, thrown gasoline on the fires of hatred in the middle east, and pis**d off the whole world in the process, what's left?
998045
No, but I got a call like that during the presidential election asking me to vote for Bush (too late, I'd already voted and it wasn't for him).  I think it's a tacky way to campaign.
865635
I have read and heard all that you are asking about also. It is amusing because now when the subject of Bush comes up, everyone says, "I didn't vote for him."  Well, someone did. \n\nThere was a special on HBO about how the votes can be and probably have been tampered with in the last election. It is kind of scary. I like the hacker that laughed and said, "give me ten minutes on the computer and I will give George Bush's social security number."  \n\nMy hope is that in 2008 the Democrats return. I think we are long over due for a change. I think Barack Obama for President and Hillary Clinton for Vice President. What do you think????\n\nTo actually answer your question the answer is YES. I have also read and heard enough facts to convince me enough was played with to ALLOW him to become President.
533594
I didn't vote for Bush but\n\n1-Clinton allowed the 5 major oil companies to buy the smaller ones out-he knew why they wanted too-he would not look in to alternatives, -look at Coalition for Alternative Fuel(on web)-he refused to grant anything for an alternative-Bush is allowing more help here.\n\n2-No doubt about it we need some order to the immigration issue-masses were flooding annually-this has caused problems(schools-state aid-medical)they came long before and no one wanted to see-they rather cut programs here (was this fair to poor here?) Bush did something-others did nothing\n\n3-War-this is always tricky-I do not support the war-but in fairness-Bush is not afraid to do something (rather we see the reason or not)many allowed some harm (better look at Ollie North  on web statement-years ago-he said these same terrorist we are dealing with today were trouble than-no one did anything-could have been some prevention of things and life's than)We did not enter Hitler's territory (history) until after thousands and thousands died-we stalled. At least he does speak out (rather we agree or not-Others cost lives by their not doing anything)\n\n4. -After huge spending on Clinton's part-many programs for poor were cut (especially Mental health and some Physical health-he allowed Pharmaceuticals companies do charge enormous prices-and allowed them to threaten Canada (what other company could) to not sell to seniors there or they would cut off the sale of vital medicine to them (heart) at least change the prices  (look on web). Now more in government are speaking out for the right too-No one said anything with the others .And Health was Clinton's campaign.\n\n5-He sees his popularity and it must be tough-Clinton would have cried and do anything (even at cost to us) for his ego.\n\n6- I hate to say this but Reagan-really hurt the environment-allowing many things that took years to get. Big time pollution. Many followed.  See how much waste is allowed for companies (on web)to dump even in water. Bush has hesitated in this area-not sure why-but he is not permitted a lot of things from companies. Hasn't done anything but hasn't hurt more.\n\n7-We see why we need to learn to speak well (although many who look and speak well are the biggest liars-snakes we have)\n\n8-No silly sex scandals-he does know to conduct himself in a nice way.\n\n9-Barbra-does do a lot of good charities-and when she is there she doesn't make it a champaign for herself. (like Hillary)\n\n10-I don't know about 'your' statement on Bush and terrorism-so I will take the blank face Bush has shown and give it to you. Thanks Bush\n\nThere is 10-all you can look up or see for yourself. Do I get a prize for this even though I didn't vote for him or Clinton?  I'm independent most don't know you can write your own-rather they like it or not.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\ns
932847
Sure!\n\nI bet BUsh's vote felt very insignificant to him today
92637
BUSH! Thank God I didn't vote for him at all! It's bad enough that he gives us Texans a bad representation! But I'd be afraid of losing my nice shoe after kicking him! No shoe is worth it!
491363
I voted for Bush.  I am disillusioned in some ways, but I don't apologize.  I think Kerry would have been worse.  I vote by issues not by party and the Democrats have to come up with someone sincere before I will vote for them.  They are too into 'slick' lately. It is hard to get a handle on where someone so slick is coming from and whether they actually have any convictions, at all.  In the last election it was very much a matter of 'the Devil you know...'\n\nI do my homework before elections, and vote my conscience.  I think the concept of 'apologizing' for one's vote if you do that is ridiculous.
1121837
I know that my last neighbor, who is gay and living with his boyfriend, voted for Bush. When I asked him why he would since Bush is against gay rights, he said he agreed with most of what Bush stood for except for the anti-gay tendencies. He went on to say that he wasn't concerned about getting married and since Bush wasn't pro-gay-discrimination (in an active sense), he didn't feel Bush's views on gays impacted his life. So he voted for him.\n\nThat's a Republican for you, though, huh? :)
541689
The people didn't choose Bush. The damn election was rigged! (I would have voted for him anyway because I thought he would do better for America than Kerry. So I was wrong.)
717838
you voted for Bush, and you're speaking about intellegence ... I guess I voted for Kerry because, unlike the puppet in office, he can speak clearly, he doesn't get nervous and smiley when he speaks in public ... he can read, and write ...
1086447
I voted for Bush in 2000. I now see how he has totally screwed up this country beyond repair. He has caused more problems for the US to deal with then he ever tried to solve. Not only with the war in Iraq, the war on terrorism but the national deficit, education and too many other areas to mention. But the problem is not Bush alone, it is the complete jackasses in Washington who waste time on petty issues while these world changing events are happening and do nothing to correct these problems because they might upset their constituency and not get re-elected!
756673
OF COURSE HE IS, HE VOTED FOR BUSH!!
567799
I voted for George W Bush and he is a great man. Shame on you.
199795
I voted for Bush twice, and now I totally regret it. I thought Kerry seemed very weak and unsure of himself in the televised debates, and that bothered me. I also didn't like the fact Kerry claims to be Catholic, but believes abortion is okay. That didn't make sense to me.  \n\nYet now if I could vote again, I definitely would have voted for Kerry or someone else. Bush has done nothing but disappoint me. Our national debt continues to grow, we continue to fight a totally unjust war in Iraq. Hussein had absolutely NOTHING to do with the 9/11 attacks, and he did not have any weapons of mass destruction. He was never a threat to the U.S. as Bush told us.  But hey, never let the truth get in the way of a good war, right? \nBush continues to violate people's human rights by holding men without giving them a trial and torturing them in secret prisons around the world. He taps American Citizens' phones without a search warrant.  How is it okay to do all this, and yet we impeached Clinton over receiving some favors from Monica? What? Makes no sense. Give me Liberty or give me death! Down with tyranny and his light blue ties.
388292
No.  In my opinion, people who voted for "B"ush do lack some sort of intelligence (especially if they voted for him a second time).  But let's not forget, Bush didn't even win the popular vote the first time.  That obviously implies that they were a lot of people who didn't vote for him (common sense).  \n\nA statement like yours is a gross over-generalization that just sounds unintelligent.  Not all "A"mericans voted for Bush or agree with how things are being run.  There are people everyday who work to minimize the damage that he's doing, tirelessly.  \n\nSo I think that the best thing for people who wish to judge all Americans based on one leader or representative they see on television every now and then is to pick up an American History book or call any halfway intelligent American and talk to them before making an ignorant statement like that.
1060927
Yes, I would.  But NOT for President Bush.  I wasn't old enough to vote for him in 2000, but I wouldn't have voted for him, due to my views.\n\nIn 2004, I did NOT vote for him, because he was doing a shoddy job as President.  He won, but I'm sure that he would have NO chance of winning a third term.
855470
Yes I did...First time ever. I'm 33. I figure it was my one vote that failed to keep george bush out of office so I feel more responsible this time around to make sure I vote.\n\nEveryone that complains about bush are the ones that don't vote. So now if I don't like the new person atleast I have the right to complain or agree since I legally put my vote in.\n\nEveryone should vote! Its your life and the life of your kids! Vote and have a say!