Is Gravity reflected to our universe from an alternate dimension?
157319
I'm interested in what kind of answers you'll get to this question.  The fact of the matter is, no one really knows what gravity is or where it gets it's energy from.  One of the few things that are known about gravity is that it is not effect by space and time like light.
511117
No scientists or astronomers SAY that there is a 5th dimension. There is no direct, observable evidence that such a dimension actually does exist. Dimensions beyond the four we know of are only IMPLIED by certain solutions to mathematical equations used in what's known as string theory. String theory actually implies that there may be as many as 11 dimensions!
846992
How can this be answeared? Well only if there is more then one universe then you are in one of them ofcourse which is alternate from all the rest..so maybe
990756
There is no definitive answer other than theories, but theories can be very convincing. The best one is this: two p-branes collided unlocking the four fundamental forces of physics; gravity, electromagnetism, weak, and strong. The variables of space, x, y, z, rapidly expanded into infinite with time. Therefore, we have the easily percieved 3 dimensions with a 4th time, all of which we can sense and measure. This is how space rapidly expanded\n\nA collision of universes caused it. Multiverses.
594695
The universe cannot have an end, it has to be infinite and completely symetrical. This leads to three possible scenarios for its shape a saddle shape, a spheroid, and a flat plane. Different experiments have led scientists to believe that space is an infintie flat plane. The main reason why we know that if there were edges to space then we would have to me moving towards some objects and away from others. This is not the case as all observed entities are moving away from us. This leads to the assumption of a infinite expanding universe. \n\nAs far as our perception is concerned we are not inside of anything since the universe occupies all of the space that we can observe so the universe is everything. But if somehow you could step out of our universe into a higher dimension you dont know what you would see. There are some theorists who believe our universe is one of many universe. But since there is no way to see out of the universe we may never be able to answer this question. I agree that if you start thinking in this manner it can get quite perplexing\n\nTo the person who said space must have an edge to expand think of a baloon. If we go down a dimension imagine that our galaxy is a penny glued on the surface of a baloon. To us the baloon has no edges at all since we cannot see out into the third dimension, yet the baloon is expanding. So from our vantage point we live on an infinite surface that is expanding and causing nearby pennies to all travel away from us.
983939
The problem with detecting the fifth dimension (or the sixth, seventh, and so on, it is believed there are 11) is that our bodies are built to measure only the three old-fashioned spatial dimensions, plus time as a fourth dimension.\n\nScientists have been hoping that at least one of the extra dimensions might be rolled up in such a way that its influence could be seen by measuring gravity's pull on a scale of, say, a millimeter or less. So far, no anomalies have been officially reported, although there have been occasional blips that are likely due to tiny experimental errors rather than the fifth dimension.
14349
The known universe based in our present level of technology is not necessarily the whole existing universe or universes.We can have a beginning in our known universe independently of the others. For example, one of the theories explain the present expansion as a huge bubble of matter and waves. But, maybe there are other bubbles. And what if the black holes are the  connections with other parallel universes in other dimensions? And the Big bang is just a transfer of matter from one universe to other? Many scientists are working now in this subject, and the best way to follow the new theories is reading the science journals from time to time.No answer is definitive because the science will continue to discover new facts and develop new theories that are beyond the wildest imagination.
52550
I believe the universe is a 'closed' shape, meaning that there is no 'edge', however it does have a finite size.  But just to entertain your question, if we one day did reach the End of the Universe we literally would be unable to describe anything on the otherside.  Everything we know about physics, space time, the fundamental forces, the universal constants and so on only exist in this universe.  Anything 'outside' of the universe could potentially then have different laws of physics and thus would be completely beyond our comprehension.  Words would literally fail.  For more fun reading, checkout the link in the sources.
1153435
We observe four dimensions everyday, three spatial and time.\nBut...theories such as string theory predict that the space we live in has in fact many more dimensions (frequently 10, 11 or 26), but that the universe measured along these additional dimensions is subatomic in size. As a result, we perceive only the three spatial dimensions that have macroscopic size.\n\nThis is not so strange as it sounds, which I'll show with an example. Imagine you are in an airplane, flying over sea. Seen from a height, the sea looks flat, two-dimensional. But when the plane looses height we start to perceive the waves, that move in a third direction we could not see before.\n\nThe universe could be the same. Four macroscopic dimensions and a few more, hidden ones. We can only perceive them for instance, by the small effects their existence might have on subatomic particles.
445645
Forth Dimension - Another Dimension?\n\nMay be you meant another dimension than our so called reality. \n\nScience knows that there is no atom as a material item, there is only energy. Energy can be rough or fine in frequency and nature.\n\nEnergy goes far beyond our so-called natural world. Thoughts are energy, intuition is. I often had a feeling about something without knowing the details. Many times it turned out that my feelings were right on. Everybody has this ability, some are more aware of it than others, some use it more often than others.\n\nScience is challenged by the crop circles. As hard as science tried to imitate the crop circles with their intricate patterns, it did not succeed. No observation brought proof that some students would bend the corn plants. Furthermore, when bent by means of earth, the plants were sharply bent, yet, when made as supernatural crop circle, they were gently bent, as if steamed. Science has no answer as to how the crop circles are made, unless it would admit that there are some otherdimensional forces at work, which have skills that go far beyond ours. It seems that intelligences without a body are at work, able to express themselves in symbolic messages, many of which resemble the stone age messages (see Professor Herman Wirth Roeper Bosch's books).\n\nMany people have reported contacts with those who had left the earth plane, and Pete Sanders (an MIT graduate) teaches otherdimensional skills, some named in his bestseller book "You Are Psychic!"\n\nBy the Bio*Chakra Light MeditationTM we can change the past and brighten the future, tapping into the brighter dimensions (see www.biochakra.com, Hilites).\n\nIs not the Cabbala Tree of Life rooted in heaven, in the other dimensions, and its branches reach to earth? What are the ancients telling us? The roots of all events on earth are in the other dimensions; and what comes down to earth as the fruits of the tree, are the worldly facts we experience. If we want to change the fruit, we have to change the roots. Here is where spirituality and religion come in. Our thoughts are of the other dimensions and can create here on earth. Should not we better have good thoughts, experience harmonious sounds, colors and events -  rather than feed our lives with detrimental thoughts, destructive noise called music and nasty scenes, which may get stuck in our unconscious and create in our lives?\n\nI think that the other dimensions make life on earth more meaningful as a school to learn our true powers.\n\nMay be you want to read Carlos Castanedas' books, especially volumes 3 and 4. Events as described in these books have been known from other cultures and areas of the world.\n\nIn naturally altered states (Alpha State and beyond) we can reach these other dimensions and potentially may know everything, for all is one. It is a question of focus without doubt.\n\nHappy interdimensional journeys.\nCordially, India.Magica
171019
Nope.\n\nThis is similar to the question, "OK, the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into?"\n\nBoth questions are based on analogies which are designed to help us think about complex situations. They tend to be ones where we think of the universe as being something like the surface of an inflating beach ball which is being blown up. Our image of the "beach ball universe" includes space to expand into.\n\nThis is a limitation of the analogy, not the actual universe. The details of General Relativity describe the "shape" of the universe and how gravity effects different parts. GR works on the scale of galaxies and galaxy clusters. For smaller scales, dropping a pencil off your desk for instance, Newton's Gravity is fine. (GR turns into Newton's Law of Gravity at small scales.)\n\nOur brains are simply not designed to imagine curved space with all three spatial dimensions. To get around this the analogies use two-dimensional universes. But the analogies can't be taken too far. In this case, the only way to really understand deeply the structure of the universe is by understanding the mathematics. There is no exact mental picture.\n\nSo, the question has no answer, and in fact, logically speaking, makes no sense. (That isn't to say it is not a sensible question, it is a sensible question.) \n\nThe usual example of such a question is: "What is north of the north pole." Once one gets to the pole there is no more North. Everything is south. So asking what is north of the north pole is (logically) a nonsensical question.\n\nSo the answer is: the question makes no sense (logically).
1009023
The universe that we live in has only three spatial dimensions. We are limited to length, width, and height, and we can only travel along three perpendicular paths. This page attempts to explain the properties of a hypothetical universe with a spatial fourth dimension. While people generally call time the 4th dimension in the universe we live in, time will be the 5th dimension in my hypothetical universe. \n\nMany fascinating possibilities exist when a spatial fourth dimension is present. Several types of wheels are possible, very complex machines can be built, and many more shapes are possible. Objects can pass by each other more easily, but they are harder to break into multiple pieces. Energy reduces much faster with distance than in the 3rd dimension, so both light and sound are weaker. Much more things can be compacted into a small space, but its much easier to get lost. In this page, I will explore these and many other interesting properties of the fourth dimension.
1007231
Current information is insufficient to give a correct answer. Once we explore more of the universe, maybe we could have a logical answer.\nst
253430
Well if gravity is what Einstein said it is=Curvature of space time.\nThan you are going to find some space time and uncurve it!\nThis would be anti-Gravity.
560107
that's a good question. when you find out what the opposite of gravity is, i believe you'll have your answer.
332409
Our universe has 4 dimensions: up/down, back/forth, left/right, and time. According to well established theoretical physics, it is likely that our universe has more than 4 dimensions and could have as many as 11 (according to String Theory). As to why we can't see them, the leading explanation is that, at the beginning of the universe, all dimensions were curled up, but that at the time of the "big bang", 3 of the spacial dimensions and time unfurled, creating the universe we know to day.  The other 7 dimensions currently remain curled up in space where we cannot see them.
533024
Is our universe in another universe?\n  \nBefore we can address that question, we must first define universe.  \n\nThe word universe denotes all space and everything (matter, energy) contained within it.  The prefix uni means one.  The root verse means word, carnate message, meaningful substance, matter.  Questions regarding our universe persist today.  Does it have a beginning and end, or does it go on forever and ever?  Is it linear or curved?  If it has limits of length or curvature, then what lies beyond the Universe?  If something lies beyond the Universe, then can’t we accurately call that the Universe?\n\nSome lay people and some scientists conceive of the universe as infinite space.  Others define the universe as finite, or limited (perhaps curved), space.  Still others incorporate the elements of matter and/or energy into their definition of the universe, as opposed to the space beyond matter and energy.\n\nGiven these concepts of our universe, some scientists conclude that the “totality of space could be infinite. Shrink an infinite space by an arbitrary amount, and it is still infinite. (Scientific American March 2005).”  \n\nAs to the notion that we live in an ever expanding universe, moving away from every other universe on the fabric of space-time, some scientists are careful to point out that “\nAndromeda, our nearest large galactic neighbor, is actually moving toward us, not away. Such exceptions arise because Hubble's law describes only the average behavior of galaxies (Scientific American March 2005).”\n\nIn accordance with your supposition that our universe is in another universe, “it has been hypothesized by some scientists that the universe may be part of a system of many other universes, known as the multiverse (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe).” Modern astrophysicists talk about multiple "pocket" universes that branch off from one another.  Stephen Hawking points out that parallel pocket universes can have no effect on a real observer inside a single pocket, so, according to Hawking, they are theoretical baggage that should be eliminated from cosmology, the study of the origins of the universe.\n\nSome string theories define the universe as a three-dimensional space in an invisible space having more dimensions. This is, in essence, a universe within a universe.  Our zone, a “braneworld” could periodically bounce into another parallel braneworld.  This may create what would appear as a Big Bang from one perspective or a Big Bounce of alternating expanding and contracting universe from another perspective.  Such a cataclysmic event is thought to occur 300 billion years from now, resulting in the rearranging and creation of a new universe.\n\nIs our universe inside another universe?  Well, apparently the Men in Black had it right.  Our universe seems to be inside of something else, another universe, called the multiverse.\n\nSteve\n:-D