Why    did  the Unitred States attack Yugoslavia in  the 90's?
152063
Oh! plese stop with the Bush bashing.Bush was'nt even president when American troops were sent in,it was Clinton and it was'nt for an Invation it was because:\n\nSrebrenica, a small Bosniak enclave on the border of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia Montenegro, was the scene for some of the worst gendercide and genocide(there was an ethnic cleansing being done) in modern Europe. \nThat is why NATO and the US sent in troops to quell the war that was going on between muslims and christians.\n\nIt was'nt an invation, Bush has invaded too much i guess...that even when American's were sent in the past to help.You think it was an invasion by Bush senior.(to my predessor)\nAmerica accomplished what it was sent out to do,that was to maintain peace.It did,America was'nt always a bully.
819935
It started when archduke Ferdinand was assassinated by a anarchist.  The US joined in when the Germans sank the Lusitania.
382944
BOY WOULD SOMEONE GIVE ewm90 SOME HELP WITH HIS SPELLING WOW MIND BOGGLING WITH SOME OF THAT GRAMMAR. AS WITH THE WAR IT WAS A MUST. HOW CAN YOU SAY UNJUST SADDAM HAD 18 DIFFERENT U.N. RESOLUTIONS THAT HE THUMBED HIS NOSE AT FOR THE LAST 14 YEARS. IT JUST TOOK SOMEONE WITH BRASS B*LLS LIKE GEORGE BUSH TO TAKE ACTION BECAUSE WE ALL KNOW THE "DEBATING SOCIETY" COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE UNITED NATIONS WAS GOING TO DO NOTHING. YOU WANT SAY GEORGE DOES STUFF TO KEEP HIS OIL BUDDIES POCKETS LINED WHAT ABOUT DEAR KOFFI ANAN, RUSSIA AND I ALMOST FORGOT OUR BUDDIES FRANCE. THAT IS WHY THEY OPPOSED THE WAR BECAUSE OF THE MONETARY INTERESTS THEY HAD IN IRAQ. AND WHERE DID WHOEVER THAT WAS GET OVER 50,000 DEAD IN IRAQ YOU MUST SMOKING SOMETHING. ASK YOUR SELF THIS QUESTION. WAS IT JUSTIFIED FOR BILL CLINTON TO UNPROVOKLY INVADE BOSNIA AND START A CIVIL WAR A SITUATION WE WILL BE IN FOR THE UNFORESEEN FUTURE. BOY HOW WE FORGET THAT HUH? I REMEMBER BACK IN 1998 WHEN CLINTON HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO TAKE OUT BIN LADEN BUT HE DIDN'T BECAUSE THE PRINCE OF THE U.A.E WAS RIGHT NEXT HIM. THAT PRINCE WAS CONSIDERED PART OF AN ALLY NATION BUT WHEN THIS WHOLE PORTS DEAL CAME UP THOSE GREAT DEMOCRATS CRIED WE CAN'T DO THAT THE U.A.E. IS AN ARAB NATION POSSIBLY LINKED TO TERRORISM. IT ALL CHANGES WHEN THE OTHER SIDE TAKES OVER HUH.
221058
try this link\n\nhttp://www.clio.co.yu/docs/polis/03_rusija.html
90659
There was war in Yugoslavia.  Everyone wanted to separate, because they didn't want to be munipulated by serbians.
677440
No I do not, The UN totally destroyed the infrastructure of Serbia. There was no movement to rebuild the damage that was created by the bombing. The economy of Serbia-Montenegro was crushed and nobody stepped in to help rebuild.\n\nThe conflict in Serbia was a UN action, led by former Democratic Presidential candidate Wesley Clark.\n\nThings are going bad in Iraq, but at least we are trying to correct the mistakes we made.
905911
The country of Yugoslavia causes haze and global warming because they burn millions of dead jewish corpses in death camps.
468765
Not a country yet... But in KOSOVO they LOVE America (and Clinton) Because they bombarded Serbia, and thus helped them towards Independence.\n\nKUWAITies like America too. Why? USA liberated them.
45937
None, as the Commonwealth of Independent States was simply a name given to the former USSR when then country started to split apart in the early 1990's.
179356
The operation was Called Operation Iraqi Freedom, that should explain a lot.  We were looking for WMDs that we knew should have been there and the other purpose was to rid the country of Saddam Hussein's regime.
699089
dirty israeli r kiling ambulance men,civ,KIDS,old women in palastine&then say it was a mistake!!!\n100s of massacres was comited by the coward israelies against Arabs & palastinians since 1948,and israel was never punished!\nbut when a palastinian try to revenge for his family who was killed or tortured by the israelies ,all the world punish all the palastinian ppl for it and call them terrorists!!!\nisrael have an army with the most advanced us weapons,the palastinian have nothing to fight with but rocks,old klashincoves & home made rockets!!!\nWho then should use a non violent approach in ur opinion.\nthe world should take action against the coward israelies or it will be a mess that will hurt all the world.
1088679
Who was the country that attack iraq \nwho was the country that attack afganistan?\nwho was the country that force iran to change their minester 26 years ago?\nwho is the country that like asians oil and one it all? \nI beilive that america is a very demacrat and good country but it did some bad things
214104
They didn't invade either place. I don't have the slightest idea what you're referring to. For one thing, both are long-time members of NATO.
358146
After the US pullout of Somolia in 1998, Osama and Al Qaeda decided they could destroy the US with one giant attack, so they planned it over the next 3 years, finally executing it on September 11th.  \n\nThis triggered the US response to terrorism.  Iraq was central in this effort that because Hussein and his regime was funding terrorism around the globe, was collaborating with Al Qaeda, and was sheltering known terrorists and terrorist groups in Iraq (one group we attacked on the first days of the current war).  Also, Hussein had been warned by the UN 17 times to comply with disarming his weapons and showing the disarmament, and he failed to do so.
266244
As the saying goes: 'good riddance to bad rubbish'!  The world court can now turn it's attention to more important matters, like getting Milosevic's two partners in crime, and they will be caught.  For some reason, the Serbs try and look like the victims in all this misery that has played out in the old Yugoslavia.  Folks, the world doesn't see it that way because of the monster's you choose to lead the charge.  Your leaders were vicious killers, they had no compassion for their fellow man and they are now paying the price.  As long as the Serbian people don't recognize this fact, they too will be looked upon as the villains.
220995
If it was fould play, then add it to the long list of violations the UN has committed.  However, as much as the Serbian people will want to use this to restart the Yugoslav war, Milosevic had heart problems for years and probably died of a heart attack.\n\nThat said, the last thing the Netherlands needs is another riot.
928002
I know that  in '99, Allbright, at Billy's pleasure, loosed Weasly Clark on the Serbians by unleashing a bombing campaign that lasted 78 days and nights, destroying all the infrastructure and every bridge along the Danube.\n\nAccording to NATO, US. Military estimates and UN approximations, roughly twenty-eight hundred Serbian civilian were killed, while little of military value was rendered combat-ineffective.\n\nSlobidan was a thug, but he had some monstrous men under his command.\nI personally don't believe Milosevic knew the full extent of the horrors at Sebrenica.\n\nAnyway, It was the Muslim separatists that violated the Dayton accords by burning churches and killing Serb policeman in '99 that led to Clinton's green-lighting the bombing campaign on the Serbs.\n\nSo much for that vaunted "Democrat Party Diplomacy"\n\nBill and Hillary provided logistical and monetary funding for the party that rivaled Milosevic's, thus guaranteeing a victory for the Clinton backed horse.\n\nI believe this election occurred shortly after the conflict, maybe 2000, 2001, somewhere in that time frame, and this paved the way for land and border concessions.\n\nI may be WAY of the mark here, but I pulled this from memory as I think If I were to Goggle it I'd be fraud.\n\nBetter to be wrong and willing to be corrected than be a hack.\n\nMy GUESS is that US-backed NATO forces provided military support and cover. If this is true then it would have certanly been in violation of  UN resolutions.\n\nI don't balme the US military, I fault the Clinton administration.\n\nTell me if I'm way off.