what range of ratios (Eng to SQA) are found in various sw companies today?
153394
At the 3 companies I've worked with, it's averaged about 6:1 Eng to SQA
464664
BSNL, BHEL, Electricity boards. There is lot of scopes in these organisation.. \n\nYou can right Engineering Services Exam and will get good posting based on the results..\n\nYou Can Also try for DRDO..\n\nAll The Best!
889338
There is no hard and fast rule, it varies tremendously by product and sector. A good starting point is to check out your competition, you don't want to discover that you have priced your goods way above your nearest competitor.
630761
They provide a quick way to analyze the general parts of a company.  With various ratios, you can figure out the profitability and possible health of the company.\n\nIt doesn't take into account short-term trends that might distort the numbers.  It doesn't look at the how well the company might do in the future with management or with future products.  There are other factors that should be considered when analyzing a company.
630755
for similar AAA\nfor congruent RHS, ASA, SSS, SAS,
117999
try http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=RSH
487640
Awww, without a GST?\n\n(tgt alt)-(unit alt) = VI\n(VI/RNG)x1.0186 = angle SI\nabsolute value of angle SI x CSF = CAS\nangle SI + CAS = SI
128231
wwww.biz.yahoo.com \n\nHowever I took the liberty of checking it out for you.  Even so here are my disclaimers I did not use the most recent 10Q, this is the Quarterly Earnings Report, I used  the above link.  And I don't know how often they update their info. \n\nNumber of share outstanding times stock price.\n\n49.56 million  share outstanding times $4.21 =\n\n208.64 Million.\n\nI hope this is a study project!\n\nhowever this is the market value of the company there are other methods to value companies such as Asset Based Valuation, Discounted Cash Flow, PE comparison Etc.
470073
See this link:\nhttp://www.enr.com/people/default.asp\n\nThat site ranks engineering and construction firms. They have a category for companies that specialize in subways/metro systems.\n\nIf that doesn't help, please clarify what you are asking for and I'll try to help.
298854
Commercial property is on the rise. Anything to do with retail is on a current sell out. Even investments in commercial property is rising very well. If youre in Rajasthan, the place is supposed to pick up rapidly for the IT and BPOs. Also, manufacturing in Rajasthan is on a rise. Contact some architects there. Or get in touch with a Civil Engineering/Construction firm immediately.
891375
http://www.rediff.com/news/2003/apr/18spec.htm
724968
Investopedia is a decent web site.\nwww.investopedia.com\n\nCurrent ratio (current assets/current liabilities) is a ratio that basically shows whether a company has enough liquid capital to pay what they owe in the next 12 months.  A current ratio of less than 1.0 is generally seen as a red flag indicating that the company will need to raise more capital to pay for their liabilities in the short term. It is a shortcut ratio rather than the definite cause-effect ratio. \n\nWorking capital is not a ratio, but a balance.  Working capital definitions vary, but it is generally cash, inventory, accounts receivable less accounts payable and accrued payables. Basically, this is the capital needed to keep the business running.  If you are a service (e.g. consulting), you generally need very little working capital, but inventory-based businesses need capital to stock the shelves and finance that gap between paying your suppliers and getting paid from your distributors. \n\nAsset turnover is Revenues/Avg. Assets.  This is a "capital velocity" ratio that shows how much money you bring in on the revenue side compared to how much capital you have put to work.  It is a somewhat meaningless ratio by itself, but becomes much more relevant when combined with "return on sales".\n\n"Return on sales" is not a common term.  It is usually called "net profit margin".  This is net profit/revenues and shows how much money equity shareholders earn on every dollar brought in on revenues after paying off all expenses.  When combined with Asset Turnover ratio, it gives you return on assets [(Return on sales) x (Asset Turnover) = Return on Assets].  This shows you how much money you are making on the capital invested.  For example, if you are getting 5% Return on Assets, you might be disappointed as bond holders might expect 5-8% returns while equity holders usually want 11-20%, depending on the risk of the business.  In other words, if a business does not return the cost of capital, it is probably a bad business.
695903
Depends on the industry.  No set formula that I know of.
796222
http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/q/cp?s=%5EFTSE
591269
CISCO, INTEL , IBM , INFOSYS , MOTOROLA, LUCENT,ALCATEL
512552
Visit (Copy & paste the whole text in your address bar)\nhttp://www.shashikanth.net/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=145&FORUM_ID=9&CAT_ID=8&Forum_Title=General&Topic_Title=Companies+%28Audit+Report+%29+Order+2003
1118808
financial ratios is meaningless if u r not comparing with the peers or the industry.\nsome, lessay current ratio, the higher means the company is vy highly liquid. but if the whole industry is vy low yet company ABC is the only company which its current ratio is high, then u need to find out y.. is it because they liquidate something assets...etc watever reasons. It may also means that ABC hasn't fully utilised its assets.\nIn short, a figure alone doesn't give much answer to u. to judge if a company is efficient or not, u need to look at the whole industry & its peers. There u will get a broader picture of that company.