Wilkinson's catalyst?
143581
I'm a little embarrased, but I had to look it up myself. It is a catalyst for hte hydrogenation of alkenes.
1119650
No, the big crunch theory was thrown out a while ago when new data from Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP). It said that the universe's inflation velocity is getting faster rather than slower from the mass in it. it may be from many things as theories suggest like anti-gravity particles. So in the end to "preresolve" any future questions from this the universe will end with matter losing it's radioactivity and it will end in cold not heat as in the big crunch.
622501
This theory has a long, convoluted explanation which you might be better researching in google.  I had a quick look for you and came up with:\n\nhttp://www.geocities.com/tokyo/1236/rayofcreation5.html\n\nI typed Ouspensky into google and got quite a lot of references to him and Gurdjieff.  Happy reading.
813965
he transforms his energy.  look up: matrix energetics\n\npowerful stuff
105180
Found an interesting page today.\nTake a look.\n\nhttp://www.fluwikie.com/
82697
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Wright_%28inventor%29
205397
It is the theory that this universe was cause by a large explosion from which hydrogen atoms where release forming different elements and what not. I have no idea, but I don't know how they came up with such theory. I believe it's plausible, but I doubt it's accurate.
364206
I think that it was bound to happen.\n\nWhat you are seeing is a person pulling individuals further and further into a private cult.  Phelps (the leader of the cult) is using a tried and true method of forming a "splinter" cult.\n\nHow this works is this:  you take an established religion.  Acquire followers/believers from that religion... while preaching the same standard things.  As time goes by, you slowly alter your message.  You criticize how the original church has lost its way.  You point out facts/ideas that have been overlooked.  You slowly separate your believers from believing in the original church and make it sound as if you know the "truth".\n\nAs your followers slowly divorce themselves from their original church, you start to have them undertake actions that people would frown on... but "need to be done" (like gay bashing).  As your followers do these tasks, they are subjected to adverse stimuli from the original church and society... even further bringing them under your control.  You tell them... "See!  The church is siding with the evildoers!  Society is sick!  See how they treat you?!?  You know the truth and they attack you for being faithful!".\n\nAs your followers become further and further separated from their old church and the rest of society... they fall further into your clutches.\n\nWhy are christians protesting at funerals?  Because power-hungry people use religion and tactics such as those to acquire and consolidate their power.  It worked for Saul.  It worked for Reverend Moon.  It's working for Phelps.
71719
According to a great biography on Ben Franklin written by Walter Isaacson, Ben Franklin actually did this experiment, and related it to his friend Peter Collinson in a letter that BF also printed in his Pennsylvania Gazette. Here is what is fishy - BF waited 4 months after the experiment to tell his buddy and publish it, even though word of similar French experiments had also surfaced about 3 weeks before BF's publication. One reason he may have waited on this so long is because BF thought it interesting but not groundbreaking. As BF relates the experiment, he did fly a kite (with a small metal rod mounted on it) in stormy weather and noticed the dripping wet line growing unusually taught. He touched his knuckle to the key on the line and drew a spark. He does not mention actual lightning hitting the kite. What I personally think happened (and I am an electronics technician) is that his kite with the metal rod was soaking up the negative electrons present in large amounts in a storm. The ground, and our friend BF was positively charged, and when he brought his knuckle close to the key, the charges equalized  - wallah - a spark! This is the same thing that happens when you get shocked by static electricity. You can see the spark, especially a strong one, when you shuffle across the carpet and touch something metal. However, such a charge might contain a potential of tens of thousands of volts, but little current and thus be harmless, just like static electricity. Had he taken an actual lightning hit I am sure he would have mentioned it had he survived. It seems that once his account got out it was embellished by other newspeople somewhat, although the story is rooted in truth. A sidenote - BF can be considered the inventor of and a strong proponent of lightning rods. These he did much experimenting with , and is credited with saving many buildings in the New England area and elsewhere. It is interesting to note that when his lightning rods took a hit, they were usually destroyed (and these were heavy metal rods!)
412339
Hi there,\n\nHere you go ... http://blair.sapdc.org/blair/cwp/view.asp?a=3&Q=503682&blairNav=|31389|31401|31403|
786580
Yes...\n\nB will be faster for n < 10^-Ω, afterwards A will always be faster.
102967
This is the best theory I've seen:\n\nhttp://www.4815162342.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3377
790927
it sounds very feasable.  i cant prove you wrong either.  its a very good explanation.
615732
He was never able to write it. He was in the middle of trying to create one theory for electromagnatism and his own theory of relativity when he died. It is yet to be done to create such a theory, although the string theory could possibly be it.
478807
According to the experts, there has been a rise in the latent energy of the Higgs field
1021626
active only in the presence of a catalyst
932271
yields "H2 + Zn2O3"\n\n^^!