whats the inside story of pakistan bangladesh war?
150126
If you really want to know the inside story of Pakistan and Bangladesh Conflict of 1971 read the book "Mainay Dhaka Doobtay Daikha" by Late Siddiq Salik (The book is in Urdu and as far I know it's English version is also available in the market) it gives the detail eye witness account including historic political and military mistakes by Pakistan Army and historic misunderstandings of Bagalis turning into separatists movement and subsequently a separate country called Bangladesh and also gives account of the vested foreign interests and their bullying into nascent democracies. Another vitally important document is "Hamood-ur-Rehman Commission Report" which was released few years back and considered as most authentic and quite unbiased document ever released in this regard.
537408
Well Man! I am from Pakistan but that does not mean I have any grudge. My true assesment or spontaneous view is that because of the situation of geo-politics and ofcourse the relationship between Pakistan and India, nobody want to be a part of situation where Pakistn and India (God bless us) again in any tense situation, I mean when any country think about investment in defence sector of these two countries they have to think closely or stop thinking.\na layman view
152085
Ask the Pakistan government
968181
why would you want 2 Go there now, With whats happening in those country's including Pakistan.  Some people love 2 put themselves in harms way.  And then wants the world 2 rescues them. CRAZY
480350
Pakistan,2 years ago.......
641952
Short answer: The worst kind\n\nComplicated but politically correct answer: Its a republic. The previous answer sums it up, although throughout much of pakistan's history they've had a military ruler often bordering a dictator-like manner of rule.`\n\nThere are several reasons for pakistan's democracy's failure to perform:\n1) The military has been an important influence in the country because of the 3 wars with India and American funding to support the Taliban militarily in the 80s.\n\n2) Corruption is rampant and many political leaders are uneducated. The educated have very little patience for politics and those that do join politics end up leading organizations like the MQM, an almost separatist movement.\n\n3) Pakistan has never had the opportunity to develop a good model of democracy. The country's founder, the man with the main vision died soon after independence and ever since pakistanis have been debating whether he intended Pakistan to be an Islamic nation with Islamic laws, or a nation of muslims with secular laws.\n\n4) Pakistan is a very diverse country in terms of religion (many sects of islam and other religious minorities), ethnicity, education, and income. Makes it harder to get to a common ground. While the same can be said about the US, keep in mind that the US has had constant waves of immigration form different parts of the world for over 200 years. Pakistan on the other hand practically had 500,000 people move there from india within the space of 1 to 2 years.
174430
1. Pakistan and India were one country\n2. When the British occupation started withdrawing from the area, Muslim and Hindu leader agreed to split in grounds of who lives where, the area's with Muslim majority will be part of the new established Pakistan, and the other area's will remain parts of India, the thing with Kashmir that the people where Muslims, but the Maharaja rolling this area were Hindu... and that's how it all started\n\nWhat I thing: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan should be united as one federal country as here (USA)
29725
Imran Khan is known for making a few politically charged statements that have raised eyebrows even when he was the captain of the Pakistan team and later in his role as a politician. The first of these statements came during an India Pakistan match in Sharjah where Imran remarked, "Let's settle the Kashmir issue over the cricket match". Though Imran claimed that he had made that statement only casually, few were impressed by this apparent insensitivity to the Kashmir problem.\n\nLater as leader of his party in 2005, led a protest rally against the US led coalition which had desecrated the Koran and made statements denouncing the Musharraf-Bush coalition.
88613
Here's a link to the CIA World Factbook enty on Pakistan. Have a ball!\n\nDon't expect someone else to do your homework for you.
25886
See 'Mangal Pandey' movie. It is about the sepoy rebellion started by Mangal Pandey. It is a pretty good movie with nice depiction of these times. Check out the movie website - http://www.risingthefilm.com/
98213
Pakistan has been an active member in the ABSG <Against ‘Buttercup’ Society of Giraffes> the CENTO <Creepy Egocentric Narcissus Tope Organization> and the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO). Pakistan is also an important member of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) <other wise referred to as the Anti-South Park militia>. Pakistan has used the Anti-South Park militia as a forum for Enlightened Moderation [3], its plan to promote a take a rain check and elucidation in the Islamic world. Besides the Anti South Park militia, Pakistan is a member of the South Asian union of SAARC. The Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO) <also known as whoa daddy got some deep pockets> is another major regional organization seeking to promote socio-economic development. Pakistan's status as the only Islamic nation to be a declared nuclear power plays a significant role in international affairs.\n\nForeign relations with the United States have seen as a roller coaster <which has killed many> throughout the history of Pakistan. In the early 1950s, Pakistan's leaders called the country the United States "most allied ally in Asia"[4]. During the Soviet-Afghan war in the 1980s and following the September 11 attacks, Pakistan remained a crucial ally. However, between crises relations have soured with sanctions being applied by the United States, once during the 1965 war with India and again following Pakistan's nuclear tests in 1998.\n\nPakistan has had difficult relations with neighboring arch-rival India with the two countries fighting three wars <after the large migration of Irish Workers impregnated their women and introduced Pakisanians to green beer> and coming to the verge of a nuclear war <like we need more halaback girls right???> on other occasions. The long-running border dispute over Kashmir resulted in war in 1947 and 1965. A third war <we now introduce the Russian’s with their Vodka> was fought alongside the Bangladeshi Liberation War in 1971. India's decision to conduct nuclear tests in 1998 immediately prompted Pakistan to test its own.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan#Foreign_relations
42933
The Indian subcontinent is an area of great political and religous strife.  India is still a relatively stable democracy but that is not the reason for disputes.  Post-colonialism has wreaked havoc on numerous areas throughout the world and this is the most populated one.  Bangladesh, Pakistan, and India were all one under British rule until 1947.  Forcing three distinct people (there are hundreds more different people between the three countries but they can loosely align themselves with the overall nation) to share resources/power/wealth is a recipe for disaster once the strong outside force is removed.  Hence the three countries were formed laregly on religous borders.  \nSince the UK left, and Pakistan and India split, one shared area has been the source of constant fighting.  This area China also has a claim to leading to its dispute with India.  India and China are working together now even though India suspects China gave Pakistan nuclear secrets.  Nepal appears to be isolated from all countries in the region due to ongoing political strife due to Maoists and guerilla fighters within the country, so I am unsure as to there specific relationship to India.  Other areas within the world where you can see this post colonial struggle taking place is in Africa in almost every country there.\nI am curious to know why you question India, do you see India as the agressor in all instances?  \nPakistan, China, and India all are operating under dangerous circumstances.  All three want to be major world powers but are not exactly sure how to go about it.  China and India are the two most populous countries in the world and thus are trying to exert their economic might and becoming the dominant player within the region.
621674
Indin Team, selectors and other cricket related portfolios and offices are held by Biharis. \nCricketers chew paan while playing and spit on other tam's players faces.\nAll cricketers become millionaires.\nIndia hosts 2011 World Cup final in the field behind Anne Marg.\nAll commentators speak in Bihari dialects.\nAll people with cattle and pigs get free entry.\nTea is served in earthen cups.
520328
THE TEAM PLAYER POLITICS RUINED HIS CAREER.\n\nONCE RAJESH CHOUHAN HIT A HUGE SIXER IN FINAL OVER TO WIN A MATCH AT PAKISTAN.\n\nAFTER THAT, ANTI-SAQLAIN VOICES SOUNDED HIGH.\n\nSLOWLY SAQLAIN SCREENED AND KANERIA HIGH-LIGHTED IN PAK CRICKET.\n\nIT IS TOLD HE TURNT RELIGIOUS.
305274
There are more than one reasons\n1. The low bounce of the pitch. Bangladesh slow ball bowlers and spinners have the advantage over Lee and Gillespie. MacGill was the one who was able to take wickets.\n2. The Aussies are too tired after the SA tour. They didn't even have 15 days break\n3. Splendid batting by the Bangladesh top order
490628
Bangladesh did not get Independence from the British! On 15th August,1947 when India got Independence, Bangladesh was a part of Pakistan.But in 1971 with the intervention of India, Bangladesh attained independence from Pakistan.This was the main reason for the 1971 Indo-Pak war.
213493
Gee...what is going on there in S'pore??  When I was there a few months ago, everything was good at Pasir Ris...what happened??\nBring back LKY as PM!  He'll take care of it!