How many calories are burned during a 30 minute jog, moderate pace?
102942
General rule of thumb is that you burn approximately 100 calories per mile (regardless of speed/mode).  If you are in good shape, you burn a little less, as your body uses fuel more efficiently.  If you are really out of shape (doesn't sound like this applies to you), then a bit more.\nSince you say you jog 2-4 miles, I would say you burn between 200-400 cal.  Probably closer to 200-350, since you are conditioned, depending on exact distance covered.
637722
Don't worry to much about the calories going in, but the calories being burnt.\n\n3000 calories burns 1 pound of fat.
111317
The external work is equal to the potential energy you gain.\n\nPE = mgh = (58kg)(9.8 m/s/s)(33 m)\n= 18757 J\n\nYour body only works at 25% effeciency though, so\n\n.25 = Output Work/Input Work = 18757 J/Input Work\n\nInput Work = 18757J /.25 = 75028 J\n\nWe need to convert to kcal.  Joule found that \n\n1 cal = 4.186 J,\n\nTherefore, Input Work = 75028 J / 4.186J/cal = 17924 cal\n\nRounding to 2 significant digits, and converting cal to kcal, we get\n\nInput Work = 18 kcal\n\nHence, climbing 9 stories doesn't even work off half an Oreo (An Oreo has about 50 food Calories, or 50 kcal)\n\n10 kcal/ minute is a reasonable rate of calorie consumption above basic metabolism for a typical person while exercising.  So a consumption of 18 kcal while climbing 9 stories doesn't seem unreasonable.
1128008
This is a huge misconception in the fitness industry. Every kind of training, whether it's interval or otherwise has the potential to burn fat, it's how much fat is burned that makes the difference between one activity and the next.  You used the operative word "weight loss" which makes the decision straight forward.\n\nLow-intensity exercise is not as effective as high-intesity exercise at burning calories. High-intensity exercise is not as effective (percentage wise) as low-intensity exercise at burning fat calories. Regardless, high-intesity exercise always wins the race at burning more total fat calories in the end.\n\nCalories are an important consideration since you need to be in a daily calorie deficit to lose weight. Low-intesity walking typically burns a greater percentage of fat calories than running. For example, say you walk for 60 minutes and burn 300 total calories. The percentage of fat burned for energy usually averages about 70%. When you take 70% of 300 this means you've burned 210 fat calories. BUT jogging burns average 40% of calories from fat, so if you jogged the same duration (60 min) then you'll have burned likely over 600 calories. If 40% of those come from fat, that's 240 calories. So even though you're burning a lower percentage of fat calories when you jog, it is still a greater amount of fat calories and total calories in the end which helps maintain a daily calorie deficit and accordingly a greater chance at weight loss.\n\nThe problem with high-intesity exercise is that it's typically harder mentally and physically so it's difficult to keep up with it unless you program yourself and commit to a tough workout every week. Age and health are also factors. My best advice is to alternate low-intesity and high-intensity to avoid burn out and make workouts more enjoyable and varied. I train this way as do all my clients with excellent results.\n\nHope that gives you a better overview on this subject.\n\nIn the meantime try these useful calculators to assess calorie consumption, and energy expenditure:\n\nTotal Energy Expenditure:\nhttp://www.preventdisease.com/healthtools/articles/bmr.html\n\nCalories burned through various activies:\nhttp://www.preventdisease.com/healthtools/tools.html#cbva\n.\n.
748541
It depends, If your doing a routine where your doing things fast with little or no break in between exercises your heart rate will stay up and you will burn more calories.\n\nIf you just going to do 20 push ups randomly you should burn around10-20 calories.\n\nCardiovascular exercise is the way to go to burn calories.  Run 1 mile burn around 100 calories.
472874
Different forms of exercise, at varying intensities, will burn different amounts of calories.  I'm a 160-pound woman and I walk at a speed of about three miles per hour; my doctor tells me this will burn about 100 calories per mile.  She also says there are 3500 calories in a pound (don't know where she got that number); therefore, I have to walk 35 miles to burn off a pound.  Whew!  Running would burn the same amount of calories in slightly less time; running up stairs or cycling uphill would burn even more (but I don't run, too painful for the joints).  There are websites where these things are calculated, you could look it up.
572337
Running 1 mile burns about 100 calories, so in one month, if you ran everyday, that's about 3000 calories.  You need to burn 3500 calories to lose a pound.  So running one mile daily, while it is good exercise, is not really enough to lose weight.  It would be better to build up to 3 - 5 miles every other day.  Then you would lose weight.  It won't make your thighs or butt bigger.
349520
i just learned this the other day. 30 minutes of sex will burn 150 calories. \nif you have sex twice a week, at the end of a year you will have exercised the equivalent of running 7 miles. \ni'm on the accelerated program.
1020773
If you take out the pieces of bread you can lose up to 30 lbs if you jog for about 20 minute every day.
218725
Though it seems violent and energetic, the only muscular event is contraction of the diaphragm and stomach muscles for less than a second.  The most vigorous physical activity (which sneezing isnt) burns about 1800 calories per hour, so about 30 calories per minute, or half a calorie per second.  So I would estimate it to be something well under 1 calorie.
1091954
Building more muscle mass through free weights will burn more calories in the long run because Cardio only burns during the event and briefly after wards, but lean muscle tissue burns calories all the time. There is no standard rate of calorie "burn" for cardio since there are so many ways to do cardio. Sprinting burns more calories than jogging, but you can't sprint for an hour. If you want to maximize the weight loss effects of cardio you should keep your sessions around 40 to 60 minutes and work harder during that time using interval training.
490102
Running/Jogging 2-3 times a week is the fastest way to burn calories and lose wieght the quickest!
523407
It depends on how intense youre doing it. If youre going at moderate pace you would lose about 500 or so calories in an hour. But when you go intense, you lose more calories alot after the work out. \n\n(All I said was for cardio exercise.)
733937
Do lots of cardio, running is on an average 100 calories per mile
1069209
Running, by far.  If I run for about 10 minutes I can burn about 100 calories.  It would take me 20 minutes to burn that many calories by biking.\n\n(Although if you are trying to get somewhere, it is definitely faster to bike!)
462357
Since you are trying to lose weight, the question is really which will burn more calories per session.  Whichever requires the body to do the most work is going to end up burning the most calories.  This figure is provded to us by something called METs (metabolic equivalents).  Overall jogging requires more METs than the eliptical, and the elipitcal requires more than biking.  SO jogging is going to burning more calories in the same amount of time than the other two.  \n\nHowever, either one of the other equipment could utilize more calories than jogging if you are exercising at a high enough intensity.  So if you are biking with a lot of resistance you will most likely burn more calories than if you are jogging at a slow rate of speed.\n\nThe best thing is to find an exercise that you like and are most likely to stay with.  Or better yet, mix it up and crosstrain.\n\nAs far as how long to exercise, it's not how long that's as important as how intense the workout is.  So instead of trying to exercise for an hour with a slow jog, you better better off going at short time period, but at a higher intensity.
55287
Running does burn more calories, but you can keep walking for 1 hr and not feel tired or worn out from exercise.\n\nRunning is stressful on your joints, whereas walking is not.  Both forms of exercise are good for your heart.\n\nIt really depends on the amount of time you have for exercise.  And what you plan on doing afterwards.  I usually enjoy walking more, so I do more of it, and thus get more exercise.  Running is a pain, and so I tend to avoid it more.  The best form of exercise is one that you enjoy.