Will america attack Pakistan in the next 1 year?
98393
No. Not as long as Pakistan keeps their current leader
757761
North korea and china are danger for usa so usa wants a strong support in that region against them.\nIndia is the only country who is able to be a superpower.\nUSA now is no more interested in pakistan. Pakistan is not supporting usa now any more.\nSo according to the changed conditions, USA sees their benefit in the alignment with india only.
584675
well... lets see what they are doing about both...\n\nOsama is pretty much relaxing in Pakistan not too worried about anything but his next attack... Bush even said he wasn't a priority...\n\nThey just extended a tax break to the wealthy... so... if their actions are any indication... taxes
478538
Yes.  Millitary action has to be taken against Pakisthan so that the terrorist problems in Kashmir will come to end.  The right person to take millitary acgtion is US. Only Bush dare do it. The only male President US has ever seen is none other than Mr. Bush.  Like he has controlled terrorism in Afgan and Iraq, he should step in Pak and control its nose poking activity. Then India will always be a trusted friend of US.
110605
this is a very philisophical, scary, thought-provoking question without a real answer. depending on the person you ask, some will yes, look at the nations we have invaded in the past 4-5 years (afgah. and iraq) with Iran coming really soon and others will say no way all the muslim nations have no army or technology we will beat them in any war. I think that the war on terror will last a long time but that its not WII although it could certainly blow up to it at any time
429585
Im writing this more as a response to nawab's answere because its pretty clear that paksitan's being spared because of strategic reasons in the subcontinent region. as far nawb's answere is concerned and his reference to pakistan having a "big" stake in the fight against terrorism and that pakis dying and the casualty number being more than 9/11 victims and also the highlight being and which forced me to post this answere that pakistan's "strategy" winning the war agaist U.S.S.R. Im glad that he pointed out the fact that the US supplied money and weapons for the war against soviet union, however american military and the american intelligence is n was not stupid enough to tell pakistan that "ok guys here's the dow n here's the hardware, go and kick ass we know u can do it on ur own while we sit at pentagon n watch the video game". cmon give urself a break and come back to reality for gawd's sake dude, pakistan couldn't even win a war against india and paki military was not even half of what its right now then (not that its any better now) and you think the US IS GONNA THROW ALL THAT MONEY AND military resources on a country like that and depend on its strategies? yeah rt? The war was majorly won because of the afghan terrain and the afghan mujahideen guirellas and also things were not going great at home for the reds and the deterioration of soviet union had started by then. tye strategies were completely provided by the US military ad to an extent the afgahn mujahideen AND NOT BY THE PAKI MILITARY (maybe there were jobless pakis fighting the war just like they are doing right now by joinign different terrorist organisations). The problems that pakistan faces today and why it has to pump in so much of itys own resources in fighting the terrorist is becoz of it s own "policies and stragies" that it followed, which was supporting taliban and other hard core terrorist groups and also turnign a blind eye to their recruitment and other unacceptable activities because pakistan wanted to get abck at india for helping bangladesh break away by cultivating terrorsit camps. entire world knows that in paki mosques  on fridays there are people collecting and donating money openly and freely in the name of islam which is used for terrorist activites. so pakistan is not the victim here its the perpetrator. its the paki guy who was the master mind behind 9/11 and the london bombers were trained in pakistan and also the 7 terrorist caught in london recently were alos trained in apkistan which they admitted. yes there are good people in pakistan but majority of them hate US and the wesatern world(no one knows for sure why the master mind of 9/11 who is a paki palnned it in the fiors place, he had no good reason to do that). they hate the same world were they immigrate to and crawl to all the nook and corners of new york or london or sydney abd then support terrorism from tere. pakistan is a country which is created by spiulling blood and it will get washed away in blood in its own blood. god bless america!!
1075444
i don't think it will happen...you get alot of people saying how Binladen especially hates the USA ....don't know why......
628374
Ofcourse.We are trying our best.Pakistan has to take the step now.
835088
No, we won't attack either of them.  We'd win a war against either country, but it would degenerate into a hell of a mess after that.  Kind of like what we're seeing in Iraq right now.
415606
No, this will be by far the biggest mistake the US will make...there is way too much at risk...with the situatioin they have already created in the middleast...I would advise Bush to stay out of it...Aggressive foreign policy doesn't have a place in this world anymore...why doesn't this administration learn from it mistakes...
578031
I think it is typical of the American hypocricy when it comes to strategic necessity. They were sure Al Quaida came from Afghanistan so they bombed the hell out of that place, then they believe Iraq trained and supplied them so it became ONE reason for making war on them sanction-strangled poor sods, however the fact that Pakistan is a Muslim country which in some ways supports Al Quaida activities has nothing to do with America's necessity to keep a nuclear partner on its side.\nStrange that they should denounce Iran for developing nuclear potential because it doesn't play ball but its ok for the Pakistanis to have it? America is a strange and powerful creature. Robert Fisk and Noam Chomsky are good on this stuff, as well as Robert Kagan.
675970
I hope not.. it would be a big mistake if they attacked Iran
693504
NOT AT ALL. America wont make the mistake 4 times!
447961
Yes\n\nI Believe The US Will Have Another CIVIL WAR Within The Next 10 Years\n\nBTW\n\nThere Is NO SUCH THING As A \nCIVIL WAR
939297
We need to flood Iraq with troops and crush them so completely they take 500 yrs to recover then move to Afghanistan and do the same there.  If we have to kill 99% fine.  Pakistan tribal areas are sheltering the Taliban, we need to start carpet bombing them right now, at night.  Do not stop for 3 months.  Then if the Pakis won't finish them off, we do.  People better realize the West is in a fight for it's life.
618429
The US will only bomb.  They have no prayer of holding the country without a unified coalition of nations.  The bombing will probably take place in about another year.
109335
Yes. It's just a matter of where, and when.\n\nIf I had to put money on it, I'd wager on either India and Pakistan going at it, or North Korea starting something.