history of informed consent?
116448
Here is some information on the history of informed consent. \n\nInformed Consent: History (National Cancer Institute) - http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/conducting/informed-consent-guide/page4\n\nTimeline of Laws Related to the Protection of Human Subjects (Office of NIH History) - http://history.nih.gov/01Docs/historical/2020b.htm
1089225
You can use this form....you have to fill it out, but you also have to pay for the finished product and have it signed and notarized by your husband ....I had one that was free but I cant seem to find the link right now....hope this is what you're looking for\n\nhttp://www.lawdepot.com/contracts/consent/
320564
http://www.fda.gov/cder/about/history/Gallery/Gallerypg.htm\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quackery\nhttp://www.uihealthcare.com/depts/medmuseum/galleryexhibits/illuminatedbody/recreated/quackery.html\n\nI hope that helps
113603
Call a lawyer, tampering with perscriptions is a crime, so I would be worried about that.  However you can find information about this in any specialized "medical law book"  You need to look at medical law so you see where this is covered.
207492
its been around for a long long time...I have heard stories of women during the 16-1700's using abortificants (herbals) and sea sponges soaked in vinegar for the purpose.
744479
A good discussion on the history of medicine is available on the free, online encyclopedia, Wikipedia at:\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_medicine\n\nHope this helps!
478790
Eh?\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page might be what you're looking for : free, editable encyclopedia on just about anything.\n\nEDIT : peck_a_neck : The content from that encyclopedia is from 1911, and might be a tad outdated ;)
179039
You MUST have their consent.  Try these links.
848819
Doctors are bound by both the law, their ethical oath, and their own moral compass.  Doctors in this story are placing the privacy of their patient before the interests of the people.  The courts will sort it out.
1052426
probably best to get in touch with your local ICU-possessing hospital and seeing if they can supply you with any suitable (anonymised) materials, or even if you can go down make the notes yourself (which will certainly give you a more true to life experience / record of the patient care, symptoms etc which may have been sugar coated in official materials or those sent out from the hosp)
159852
http://www.emedicine.com/ent/topic130.htm
590801
I don't believe there should be a date and time stamp on things of this nature.  If you do that then you're saying that at this date and time your openion might have been accepted.  Ethics involves personal questions, which no matter what the thought, good or bad, it will still be wrong to some portion of the population.  Ethics is an individual issue, they should be dealt with on an individual basis, not in a public forum.  You will never convince a person to think different when they are out numbered and backed against a wall.
707435
1991, I believe, but it has been updated, clarified, and amended since then.\n\nGoogle the entire term for more info.
118545
The history of the condom.
237683
Try:\nhttp://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003058.htm
1164580
If there is the consent of all humans, there need be no one\nto lead what I would suggest, which is the formation of a\nconsensus that good must prevail over evil (that is the \npreamble) and then the detailed definitions of the values and \nitems that must be considered good and those that must be \nconsidered evil, for which everyone has a say in the definition, \nwhich should be understood and accepted by everyone as to \nwhat shall guide his living. \n\nThe length of time to finish this project need not discourage us.\nI believe that the necessary instrument to begin it is available \nnow - the internet at its present stage.\n\nThe phrase "if you were given consent by all humans",\nif converted to an axiom, would lend hope for my suggestion.\nThus,\nHERE IS NOW A SIMPLE PROPOSAL \nFOR ALL TO CONSENT.\n(If there is one ahead of this one, i would consider that)\n\nI appreciate the posting of the question by the asker.\n\nPeace could come, simply because we all want it,\nsimply because it is logical. This proposal is not religion.
275477
http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/vaccines/Jacobson_v_Massachusetts_brief.htm