What really happend with 911?? Why were there no wreckege and bodys at pentagon, was it a missle?????
100824
PM: Debunking The 9/11 Myths - Mar. 2005\n\nhttp://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=1&c=y
785092
In my honest opinion I wouldn't be surprised. Did you know that the american government knew about a possible attack on Pearl Harbor. They knew about it but did nothing. Why? Because they wanted to join the war, but the american people did not want to. So they needed a push, for war. What better push for war than having the enemy attack you on your soil. The one thing maked me believe that the government had something to do w/911, is that there was no plane wreckage or luggage or anything resembling a plane when it went down in the Pentagon and in Penn. Why?
759425
Last night I saw a more detailed explanation of what killed him and honestly, it made my blood run cold.  A pin prick of this killed him?  I think someone in our Homeland Security needs to do some serious large-scale possibility scenarios.  They didn't really address that possibility on the program I watched, but it was the first thing that occurred to me.  Hopefully it isn't a weapon that lends itself to mass scale use.
1039881
bravo aurastin.  Just a few more to look at to help put an end to this junk:\n\nhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html\nhttp://wtc.nist.gov/\nhttp://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html
382665
for the same reason the security videos of the pentagon "plane" aren't being released..for the same reason FEMA and engineers can't explain how bldg 7 came down...for the same reason the 911 report is a movie script instead of an investigation....we all have been victims of a neo-conservative con game that has put us at war and given them their dream - power, oil, money, glory and the chance to mmanifest their white-centric, pax-americana vision for the world.
560700
Anyone that has ever been interested, this is the same old boring video that has been out forever on the net.  It is NOT one of the two high-speed or high-resolution videos confiscated from both a nearby gas station and the roof of a nearby hotel by the FBI.\n\nThough Fox News is saying that this now "explains everything, go back to bed folks", it answers absolutely zero real questions about 9/11.\n\nThe families of the victims of 9/11 gave a list of 263 pertinent questions to the 9/11 Commission.  They received clear answers to just 17.  They need to know what happened to their loved ones, and we as Americans deserve the truth.
1018999
No official report corroborates your claims.  You're really embarrassing yourself.  The use of profanity only shows you lack understanding, intelligence, and logic skills.  That is why you let a novice fiction filmmaker spoon-feed you information contradicting everything you saw on that day.  I am sorry for you.\n\nThe terrorists on flight 77 did not need to take off nor land the plane.  The take-off part had been done for them.  They never planned to land.  So what does it matter if they had trouble with landings?\n\nImpossible turns?  Could it be that the terrorists didn't know what they were doing?  I doubt they planned to make those insane maneuvers.  The first attempt at the pentagon was botched, so they had no choice.  They were planning to die anyway, why wouldn't they attempt an "impossible" maneuver?\n\nLight poles at the pentagon were knocked from their break-away bases (new safety design), unlike the poles the filmmaker references in another accident.  Oh, and ripped out of the ground is not damaged???  The poles did exactly what they were designed to do.\n\nhttp://911myths.com/\nhttp://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html\nhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html\nhttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/05/911_documentary_removed/\nhttp://wtc.nist.gov/\nhttp://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html\n\nNow please shut up.
1175030
I think it very convincing. I remember wondering why there was no exterior plane wreckage the day it happened. If it was a missile or a military plane the government would want to hush it up as it would be difficult to pin that on Islamic nationalists unless they had help. It is a bit like the anthrax attacks. One of the 9-11skyjackers was treated for an anthrax skin lesion, an extremely rare condition before 9-11. There was also a very direct link between one of the skyjackers and the first anthrax victim. His former landlord worked in the same building. Yet the government avoided investigating any links and tried to find a scapegoat.
1163400
considering that one of the first things i saw on the page said, "Proof Blue Screen Technology Faked 2nd Plane "  i know its crap.\ni'm tired of writing about the 911 conspiracy stuff and these conspiracy ideas floating around right now are just getting more and more outrageous.  are there some questions that need to be answered about 911? yes probably are a few....but these questions have NOTHING to do with: now blue screened planes, planes swapped secretly for missiles and drones, faked plane crashes, secret voice sampled passengers to fake phone calls home, secret landing fields, breakaway light poles, hundreds to thousands of planted "witnesses" and fake work crews planting explosives.\nthis stuff is either some strange disinformation campaign, or someone trying to make a buck off people who don't trust the government and can't think.
71520
Absolutely! Look at the pentagon! Anyone with half a brain that watched the live CNN coverage of the hole can see... the hold was 15 feet, the plane was 44 tall, there were no wings on the lawn, yet the hole was 15 feet... catch my drift? The hole wasn't big enough to fit that plane. Yes, it is sad that so many people died, what makes it even more sad is that are government is likely to have taken a part in the losses of our own lives. Couldn't imagine what they could have used such an even for....hint hint... Patriot Act... hint hint...
1160864
lucky2bealive, I don't want to disagree with you but I don't believe you are going to find anywhere in the historical records that Bin Laden claimed responsibility for the 9/11 bombings. What he has done is praise the matyrs of that event. However, there would be more clarity and the issue can be put to bed finally if the government gave us the names of all the people that died in the various events. Where are the planes that crashed? Do you really believe that a building like the Pentagon would have cameras that are intermittent and take pictures every 7/8 seconds. Come.. Come. We are talking about the most technologically advanced country in the world. Something smells fishy and the stench cannot be dispersed until the Government come clean. Have you ever seen reports of the examination of  the so called crash sites?
1093022
no, it isn't. i was at the pentagon that day and it wasn't a plane. where is the tapes in question on loose change?
1042088
Still a little in shock and such over the event. I was at my school (high school at the time) waiting for a class to start. The class clown of our grade, Sean, walked in saying his dad just called and said something about [I don't remember what he said exactly]. We all told him stop kidding. We then got the announcement over the PA of what had happened. I think at that time both towers were hit. We got to go home early. My dad worked in NYC but nowhere near there. As for people who passed on, a co-worker of my dad's wife was in one of the tower's on one of the floors that was directly hit. Her name is Laura Longing.
556651
The buildings looked like they were professionally demoed. Plus, some of the people questioning the matter have been killed in accidents or murders. \n\nI don't know if Bush himself knew about it or not, but I find the whole thing suspicious. Plus, there was no evidence of a plane hitting the Pentagon. No wings, no footage from security cameras. But then the question is if it wasn't the plane that hit, where's the plane with all of those passengers? Also, what did explode at the Pentagon? I heard on the news at first that it was a truck bomb, then it was changed.\n\nbradsgranny, Bush has said he wasn't interested in Osama's whereabouts since the Iraq invasion.
309451
Oh my lord I knew it wasn't the truth.When I first seen the towers go down they went down as if there had been a demolition crew sent there to make sure it went straight down.What are we suppose to do as americans.We only have the truth that the government wants us to have.I have a deep ache in my heart for all the innocent lives lost not only here but those still being killed in Iraq.Why can't we have peace and love back in our lives.I have to go now need to go hug my husband and my mom.
1056606
I think some people are just grasping at straws.  There were thousands of people who saw a plane crash into the pentagon, no one saw a missle.  This seems to be based on a couple of people who weren't even looking at the pentagon hearing a woosh sound.  So they take conjecture of a couple of people over the word of thousands.  By the way, the plane was there, just in a lot of peices.\n\nThe stupid picture everyone refers to is filled with smoke and workers.  It was taken from a ground level which also obscures most of what is going on.  They removed the plane in peices over the next few weeks, or are all the news networks like CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, etc... all in on the conspericay too?
108448
This is one of those nutty conspiracy theories.  The satellite photo was takeng the day after the attacks.  It doesn't show much of anything that you can distiguish in any detail.  For all we know, they could have hauled debris away that might have hampered rescue efforts.  Who knows how much of the debris might be in the building?\n\nThe second photo was taken 3 days after the attacks.  Again, debris could have been removed to safety reaons, etc. And it isn't a vgood picture.  Debris could be in areas not shown on the photo like the courtyard area.\n\nThen of course there is the security tape showing the crash.  There is nothing new here, this is just someone who has too much time on their hands.\n\nAdded:\n\nYour question was "try this out and comment".  You posted a link to inconclusive photos that could be interpreted any number of ways.  You try to point to some vague conspiracy and a cover up with no supporting evidence.  How do you think people are supposed to react?  You ask where the wreckage is and I provide a number of plausible explanations that you chose not to ignore and not to analyze.