How much was returned to the economy by each, the tax cuts and the re-fi boom for 2000 to 2006?
103192
Look in Bush's friends accounts.  That's where you'll find the dough.
1126007
$162.7 billion as of February 3rd 2006
313247
Try this website, the calculator can tell you values relative to the 2004 dollar which is close enough to the 2006 dollar for your purposes.\n\nhttp://eh.net/hmit/compare/
143923
Collectively, for 2005, the federal government collected\nthe following:\n\nIndividual Income Taxes: 927.222 (billion)\nCorporate Income Taxes: 278.282 (billion)\nSocial Security: 794.125 (billion)\nExcise Taxes: 73.094 (billion)\nOther: 81.136 (billion)\n\nSee page 31 of reference #1\n\nIndividually, federal income taxes are based on\nthe following tables:\n\nFiling single\n-------------\n\nUp to $7300: 10%\nUp to $29700: $730 + 15% of anything over $7300\nUp to $71950: $4090 + 25% of anything over $29700\nUp to $150150: $14652 + 28% of anything over $71950\nUp to $326450: $36548 + 33% of anything over $150150\nAbove $326450: $94727 + 35% of anything over $326450\n\nFiling joint:\n-------------\n\nUp to $14600: 10%\nUp to $59400: $1460 + 15% of anything over $14600\nUp to $119950: $8180 + 25% of anything over $59400\nUp to $182800: $23317 + 28% of anything over $119950\nUp to $326450: $40915 + 33% of anything over $182800\nAbove $326450: $88320 + 35% of anything over $326450\n\n\nSo, for example, if you are single and make $40000,\nyou would fit into the "Up to $71950" category and\nyour calculation would be:\n\n$4090 + 25% of (40000-29700)\n$4090 + 0.25 * (10300)\n$4090 + $2575\n$6665\n\nFor more information, see reference #2.
558689
Estimates around $40 billion for 2006.
151009
About $CA420,000\n\nhttp://www.rbc.com/economics/market/pdf/house.pdf
757973
Hi, you have almost invested the full amount in tax savings. I am giving you a web link.  Please go through it.  It will give you full details about Income Tax and Tax savings.\n\nhttp://www.incometaxbangalore.org/taxinfo/trates06_07.htm\n\nPlease note that long questions and difficult questions are usually un answered.  May with that reason no one has answered your question.
172061
nothing on the first-ok, around $7000.  15% on the next $7000 to about $25000 (sorry, i didnt look these up).  $25K to $45K about 25%.  35% max.  But dont forget 7.5% social security, and 4.5% (?) medicare, both on $0-86000.  And dontdont forget, if you have dependents, each cuts out about $5000 (?) of income from being taxed.
1127553
Briefing.com or Yahoo Finance will summarize available data. Flyonthewall.com will also provide this information
799375
It varies based on other factors besides whos in power.\n\nDid well under Reagan (until about 1987 when it crashed)\nDid ok under Bush I (I think but not great-- we had a recession during that time too)\nDid great under Clinton (in later years)\nUnder Bush II, not so good until recently.  Dow around 11k in 2001, 7800 in 2002 or 2003 (can't remember which) and its taken since then to get back to 11k and greater\n\nGenerally market does well during war time and somewhat thereafter.\n\nAccording to Link in above poster's response....\nThe table tells the story. Since 1948, Republican Administrations have controlled the White House 57.2 percent of the time. But during the period that the GOP was in office, stock returns have averaged only 9.53 percent per year, while under Democratic administrations, stocks returned 15.25 percent per year, more than five percentage points higher. \n\n\nDanny, you need to get your facts straight.
497744
Here are the facts the media and Democrats don't want you to know:\n\n* Consider the CONSISTENT 4.7% unemployment rate - lower than the average for the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s and 1990s.\n* Inflation has been held under 4% and has been as low as a little over 1% in every year this decade. Compare this with the double digit inflation of the 1970s.\n* Jobs are being created by the hundreds of thousands per month. 200,000 jobs created in March and 130,000 jobs created in April.\n* The stock market is doing fantastic! My own retirement fund has grown by 80% in the last two years - thanks mainly to international funds and small cap funds. Small caps are generally newer startups.\n* The consumer confidence index is at 109.6 ... the highest it has been since it was 110.3 in May of 2002.\n* Housing starts are up 6.9% over March of 2005, and housing finishes are at 23.4% over March 2005 rates.\n* Retail sales are up 7.9% over March of 2005.\n* Tax revenues are up to $2.052 TRILLION dollars for 2005. Throughout the 1990s, the average tax revenue for any given year was only $1.5 trillion. The lesson is lower taxes = more economic expansion = more real gains in tax dollars.\n\nEach of these statistics is verifiable fact. Let's see how many liberals call me a liar. Should be interesting.
848494
2000$345,201,356\n2001$129,277,472\n2002$4,990,960\n2003$48,731,944\n2004$5,281
497734
The US's GDP for 2005 was 12,485,725.
436052
try http://www.economist.com/countries/Russia/profile.cfm?folder=Profile%2DEconomic%20Data\n\nIt states\n\nCurrent-account balance/GDP 2000: 18.04 2001: 10.95 2002: 8.65 2003: 9.02
1030264
The economy is booming all over, despite the war, and the current interest rate hikes. \nThis is due to Bush's policies on tax cuts, THEY WORK!!!!!!!!\nIf we keep more money, we spend more money.\nif we spend more money, we stimulate the economy\nLiberals who are morons, and smoked to much weed during economics can't understand this. \n\nBut it's more than that, Bush is doing a fine Job and the libs know this, they are scared. And so there answer is to smear all he does, everything he says and does bad and good will get major spin from the libs, they are only capable of hate. The dark side as it were.
107638
it is the calendar year prior. so a fiscal ended in anything 05 would be a 2004 year.
77747
No, just general slowing followed by a significant decline in 2007. \n\nSpending in Iraq and Louisiana along with a continuation in consumer spending will carry 2006. Once real estate commences a decline and real estate refi $'s are not available to augment consumer spending and the budget deficiet eliminates the possibility of a tax cut as a stimulus then the consumer will no longer have the ability to carry the economy by spending. Escalating long term interest rates and weakness in the dollar compared to foreign currencies combined with continuation in budget deficeits will lead to major slowdown in foreign investment in the private and public sector (bonds). A prolonged recession will follow that will include significantly higher unemployment as corporations cut costs by continuing to outsource labor. \n\nThe fed will first stop the short term rate increases and then they will try to cut rates, but it will be too litle to late. Bush will go down in history as the weakest President of all time.