what is the horsepower rating on a 2000 chevy454?
98379
I'm pretty sure the last versions of the 454 were 290hp.  Hope this helps,
245120
If you are putting in an X-pipe then you are doing cat-back but anyway i had bassani on 89 mustang 5.0L with trick flow every thing and it sounded great but i was a little over 400 HP it will depend on your application
243765
The CODO Camero 427 a factory race car with over 500horsepower or a 1967 stingray with the high compression 427 engine with about 560 hp even through they rated it at 430hp for insurance reasons
492458
I seriously doubt you have a 50 HP motor!  That is industrial size, and I wouldn't expect a question like that here.\n\nWhat voltage?  A 3-phase 50HP 230V motor is 130 amps!  There is no single-phase motor that big.  If you really have this, get an electrician to install it.
294307
If you get a kit then it will tell you whether or not you need to do anything other than bolt on the kit. Here's one site to look at...\n\nOne other thing... You can NEVER have enough HORSEPOWER!!
259988
ODIN 6.2.0.4 FT-ENGINE
855029
i have a 2000 corvette and i was up to 150 in 5th gear. it has 6. i haven't been able to get the full 200 it's supposed to get...
75508
A standard 22-250 is pretty fast as is.  I would just go with the fastest factory load you can find.
328168
Horsepower = torque in lbf.ft x rpm / 5250.
135578
the v6(1.8) has 130hp and 115 torque\n\nthe v4(1.6)dohc has 105 hp and 100 torque\n\nthe v4(1.6)och had 88 hp and 98 torque
203698
The unit for horsepower is horsepower. But 1 horsepower is defined as 33,000 ft*lbs/min, or 745.69987 watts.
222768
Hard to say without knowing a little more, but assuming the cam timing, ignition timing, carb, plug wires and basic assembly were all done correctly, and everything is working as designed, I would say you are probably around 320-350 H/P\n\nNow someone on this site said they HATE when people guess at answers, but on THIS one, that's about all we can do
551860
Not sure what you are asking....but exhuast header will vary depending on the engine and type of header.  Typically you may gain up to 8-10 % performance.
488693
You don't give any stats for your Camaro, but I would estimate that the earlier answer is correct in assuming around 200 hp currently. I don't know what the curb weight of your particular vehicle is, but if it's anything like the ~3K lb. Camaros of its era, your mass-to-power ratio (power-to-weight is mathematically meaningless) is at a bit of a disadvantage to his; he may only pull 140-168, but Sunfires are light. Modern engines have much more favorable (and constant) torque curves than those of years past, so you are also at a disadvantage there. You don't mention tires, but since I assume you've changed them at more-or-less regular intervals, they shouldn't be an issue. Technically speaking, your car is at a bit of a mechanical disadvantage, and since you refer to him as a "kid," he probably has an edge in reaction time. However, he is also probably fairly inexperienced, and may drop the ball from over-eagerness, so my advice is to rely on intimidation.
196208
Also, you cant go by just numbers alone.  When a car has X amount of Horsepower and X amount of Torque that means its maximum of each at a certain RPM.  Some cars have high numbers but are slower than others.  My friend had a 350Z brand new.  I had a 15 year old 5.0 mustang stock.  My car was rated around 225 hp 300tq his was rated at 300hp 260tq.  His Z was much smaller and lighter and brand new.  My car spanked his at off the line, rolling, freeway, anything.  My car did not have a good max hp but it had good power throughout the rpms rather than just peaking at a certain rpm.  So you cant go by just hp,tq and weight.  You really have to just drive the car.
229325
Not going to be to great, around 200-225 HP. But it will have good torque.
865403
Alright Alright...I'll calculate this for you! Whatever! Ok...What 4x4 are we talking about here?\n\nAssumption:\n4x4 = JK Jeep Wrangler.  Here are the specs from Wikipedia:\nA 3.8 L OHV V6 producing 205 hp (153 kW) and 240 ft·lbf (325 N·m) will be the base engine, replacing the venerable AMC Straight-6 engine. \n\n205hp=153kW!!!!!  I can tell you straight up that to produce this amount of power from solar panels would be ridiculous!  If you go up to Home Depot and ask them for a 153kW System for your house, they will tell you to get lost! The average solar panel at PEAK Efficieny can produce roughly between 60 - 110 Watts! \n\nThus lets take the best case scenario.  At peak efficiency:\n153,000 Watts/110 = 1,390 Solar Panels!!\n\nSo...to power up your 4x4(Of course that 205hp to the crank and not to the wheels!) you would need around 1,390 solar panels.  Not that bad though!