Why does Bill O'Reilly like loofahs?
113611
Because it helps to scrape some of the bull-sugar he pontifictaes about off, plus it helps his flesh-tone makeup appear more even.
678813
He looks like the deer caught in the headlights to me. When is this term going to end, can't come soon enough. Sure people had bad things to say about Bill, but at the very least the guy presented himself with some charisma. This \nbird looks like he doesn't have a clue.
588213
GW. he always has that look and attitude like he's talking to 8 year olds. i think he learned it because Rove and Cheney talk that way to him. and i really get the vibe that he only understands about a third of what he says.
95027
Because he is Bob Dole.\n\nAnd it is a parady of something that he did a long time ago that caught on.  He doesn't do that in real life.
962568
I like it but I think he steals from other shows, like Fr. Ted, a bit. There was one priceless thing on the Halloween show where they did a send up of 'Thriller' and the zombies all did the 'River Dance'. It was very funny. I think as he goes along he's improving. When you start hearing people called 'Looders' in every day life he'll know he has arrived. Pat Shortt is very talented.
1045530
The O'Reilly Factor is the premeir news show on television today. Yes, he is pompous and arrogant, but he does it in a way that cuts out the B.S. and is straight to the point. I love it when some idiot liberal comes on his show and can't even make an educated point (yes, he does give them an opportunity to speak until they stop making sense).\n\nBill Maher is a little pansy *** wimp, who tries to come across as some brave, opinionated comedian, but really isn't even that funny. At least Al Franken is somewhat funny.
103013
I have heard he did that AGAINST the advice of the high paid advertising firms.  I was told it was his own idea to pitch his own product, because it was what he had always done and it would save money.  The experts told him it would never work, he was too old to appeal to the right demographics.  He was a stately old gentleman of the south and I think he would be appaled at what they have done with his image these days in the silly cartoon form.  It is a parody of what the real col. stood for.  He was a great empire builder and a charitable humanitarian.  Yes I said humanitarian.  I didn't say chickenitarian!
10664
O'Reilly does have a background in local television news and tabloid TV. I would call him a commentator more than a journalist, as he is inclined to  editorializes on the news more than break it. \n\nHere's a bit of his professional biography from wikipedia:\n\nAfter graduating from Marist, Bill O'Reilly moved to Miami, Florida, where he taught English and history at a Jesuit high school for two years. After leaving Miami, O'Reilly returned to school, earning a Masters in Broadcast Journalism from Boston University in 1976. While attending BU, he was a reporter and columnist for various local newspapers and alternative news weeklies, including the Boston Phoenix. O'Reilly did his broadcast journalism internship in Miami during this time, and was also an entertainment writer and movie reviewer for the Miami Herald.\n\nO'Reilly's early television news career included reporting and anchoring positions at WNEP-TV in Scranton, Pennsylvania, where he also reported the weather. At WFAA-TV in Dallas, Texas, O'Reilly was awarded the Dallas Press Club Award for excellence in investigative reporting. Then it was off to KMGH-TV in Denver, Colorado where he won an Emmy for his coverage of a skyjacking. O'Reilly also worked in Portland, Oregon, Hartford, Connecticut, and Boston. [5] In 1980, he anchored his own program on WCBS-TV in New York where he won his second Emmy for an investigation of corrupt city marshals. He was promoted to the network as a CBS News correspondent and covered the wars in the Falkland Islands and El Salvador from his base in Buenos Aires, Argentina (1982). In 1986, O'Reilly joined ABC News as a correspondent on ABC World News Tonight. In three years, he appeared on the show over one hundred times, receiving two National Headliner Awards for excellence in reporting.\nWJLA, Washington, DC Inside Edition promo featuring Bill O'Reilly, 1993.\nEnlarge\nWJLA, Washington, DC Inside Edition promo featuring Bill O'Reilly, 1993.\n\nIn 1989, O'Reilly joined the nationally syndicated Inside Edition, a current affairs television program (called "infotainment" by critics). He started as senior correspondent and backup anchor for British journalist David Frost, but soon took over the anchor chair when the viewers found him more appealing. In addition to being one of the first broadcasters to cover the dismantling of the Berlin Wall, O'Reilly also obtained the first exclusive interview with murderer Joel Steinberg and was the first national anchor on the scene of the 1992 Los Angeles riots.\n\nIn 1995, O'Reilly left Inside Edition to enroll at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, where he received a Master's Degree in Public Administration. Upon leaving Harvard, Roger Ailes, chairman and CEO of the then startup FOX News Channel, hired O'Reilly to anchor The O'Reilly Report, which aired weeknights. The nascent channel's most popular show was renamed to The O'Reilly Factor when it moved to a later time slot in 1998 since the host was the main "factor" of the show.
590093
Since grass would turn up on one of those pesky random drug tests they give us at work, I'll have to think of something else...\n\nOkay, I sat in garage with my car running for an hour. Now I should be able to think like a liberal. \n\nIt's because he's smart enough to rig an election (twice), manipulate the world market on oil, help the Republicans steal congress, & cause 9-11...\n\nBut he's such an idiot he never thought of faking WMD's.
865154
They don't make Ipana anymore\nOnly middle-aged hippie ladies worship Ramtha\nTennessee is close to Alabama, so I bet he's been there\nHe probably thinks Osama is a jerk\nI would bet that he does listen to Bad Mama Jama, as it's a good song, it's got a funky beat and you can bug out to it.
1063319
do you know what is amazing... conservatives can see though the bias of your site, yet say O'Riley is unbias?\n\nIt's really crazy, if they have enough logic to see through one person's bias, but no enough to see through bias on their own side... O'Riley doesn't even try to hide it... \n\nI mean I can see Franken and Moore are bias... it's blatantly obvious... yet I don't think it's even as obvious as Coulter, Rush, Hannity and O'Riley... oh well, I guess they have the rose colored glasses on...
623259
There is an old addage that says something about truth and humor. Whaaattt???? Not my exclusive source but I like his interpretations and observations.\n\nHe is far from radical and has a very realistic view. I've seen CNN and even Fox news air clips from his show. Stuff they won't directly say. Thier getting thier news and commentary from him. Sometimes.
849090
I've read many of his articles on FindLaw, where he discusses some of the issues raised in the book. \n\nFrom what I can see, he's a very intelligent and loyal conservative who is saddened by some of the things being done to his party.
1077015
I don't need proof to know that O'Reily is an idiot.\nI personally love Colbert and Stewart.
1016561
O'Reilly is a loudmouth gasbag and is unwatchable. He's too impressed with the sound of his own voice.\n\nI'm a conservative, and refuse to watch him.\n\nYet even with him on it, Fox is still better than ABCCBSNBCCNNMSNBC which I refuse to watch. They've lied to us for far too long to be ever trusted again.
1062412
This was the answer given to the question about the south park episode. and some other questions, on Al Gore\n\nJust wanted to answer OP's questions. I didn't understand it either, and thought it was a pretty weak episode, but I found this:\n\nAl Gore saying "Serial" or "Cereal" instead of serious.\n\nAl Gore uses the word "serial" in place of "seriously/serious". This is in reference to his gaffe on The Oprah Winfrey Show when he was asked for his favorite "cereal" and his answer was "Oprah", thinking that the "Oprah" show was a serial.\n\nAl Gore saying "exalciore"\n\nThe "Excelsior" tag line that Al Gore uses is a nod to the "Godfather of Comics," Stan Lee; the line was his signoff in his "Stan's Soapbox" editorial column in Marvel Comics. \nThe "Excelsior Hotel" in Little Rock, Arkansas is where Al Gore asked for Bill Clinton to endorse his bid for president in 1988. He didn't get it. It is also the hotel where Clinton allegedly groped Paula Jones. [2] \nAl Gore talking about "Man-Bear-Pig"\n\nThe hunt for Manbearpig mocks Al Gore's fight for global warming awareness. At the end of the episode, when he says he wants to make a movie starring himself about a subject other than "MBP" (Manbearpig) it refers to the indie movie An Inconvenient Truth, set to open on May 26, 2006. His appeal to the boys can be compared with his attempts at winning youth support through his television network, Current TV.
940380
I like both Rush and O’Reilly, but for different reasons.  You really have to go through Rush’s orations closely to find the true meat and useful information.  However, he is a great spinner.  I remember his earlier days when people were actually asking him to run for political office.  His answer that was to explain “I am an entertainer, not a politician.”  I still look at him as an entertainer.  He is fun to listen to, but I make my own decisions.\n\nAs for O’Reilly, I like him because he has shown on several occasions, he is willing to bash the Republicans as much as the Democrats.  Yes, he is a conservative thinker, but if the Republicans or a specific Republican is doing something he doesn’t agree with, he has no problem with saying so.  In other words, he is a conservative thinker that does not hold to any specific party line.  If he agrees with something, he says so.  If he doesn’t agree with something, he tells you why.  \n\nSo, to answer your question, they contribute differently.  Rush contributes entertainment and makes you think about your beliefs regardless if you agree or disagree with him.  O’Reilly contributes commentary based on his belief that is based on less rhetoric and more on actually evaluating the issues.  \n\nI don’t completely agree with either of them, but I do enjoy listening to both.