what kind of artificial intelligent product does the U.S. bomb squad use?
108376
The Bomb sqaud is one of the most avid users of multiple types of IA products.\n\nFuzzy logic controlers are used by this and other law enforcement groups to guide detection robots into the field\n\nImage recognition algorythms such as GRG5 are also quite comon to quickly asses potential threats.\n\nOne really Interresting algorythm is ISM (Interpretative structured modeler) which plots a causal chain linking ideas (Such as inferred motives, or open problem statements) by using a logical connector then following the conmutative property of booleans establihes cyles and links to plot a course of action with the least possible risk
340977
I know one thing for ABSOLUTE sure.\n\nBoth the CIA and NASA have been investigating the use of EMF, microwaves, and sound waves for disabling, irritating, disconcerting, or controlling people in other ways for MORE THAN 35 years.  \n\nIn other words, this work was already long in progress by 1970.\n\nMany, many useful things have already been carefully determined and equipments developed, but little of it is generally known.\n\nNow for my guesstimates:\n\nI am pretty sure they can make you vomit from a distance, possibly not knowing how this is happening.\nAlso, cause headaches, cause pain, cause dizziness, and similar things.\n\nAs to drugs, that has been a special focus of all major intelligence agencies.  The Soviets probably developed some things we still do not know about.  There is an armamentarium of these, all carefully studied, known and catalogued for any future possible use or contingency.\n\nThe Russians used a special gas, not disclosed, in the Moscow Theatre hostage crisis.\n\nHowever, from time to time some less conspicuous use is made of these items.\n\nI daresay if you use your imagination, you would not likely be far off the mark.\n\nThe oversight of these activities is wholly inadequate.  Even supposedly moral people who should be interested by virtue of their positions in government tend to turn a blind eye in this direction.\n\nUnfortunately, that means the less conscientious could be doing virtually anything, perhaps surpassing Hitler, probably at least equivalent.
980086
yes i do, it's a russian made short range anti aircraft anti missle weapons system.its a mobile weapons system with radar,it's armed with missiles to shoot down cruise missles, helicopters, spy drones,u.a.v,etc,it also has two very powerfull long range self auto mated machine guns,its a formidable weapon for self defense.i'll give you the link to it as i study only the best weapons in the world.
320413
(m)\n\nArtificial intelligence (also known as machine intelligence and often abbreviated as AI) is intelligence exhibited by any manufactured (i.e. ) system. The term is often applied to general purpose computers and also in the field of scientific investigation into the theory and practical application of AI. \n\nAccording to the American Heritage Dictionary, robotics is the science or study of the technology associated with the design, fabrication, theory, and application of robots. Czech writer Karel Capek introduced the word "Robot" in his play "R.U.R" (Rossuum's Universal Robots) in 1921. "Robot" in Czech comes from the word "robota", meaning "compulsory labor." \n\nFuzzy logic is an extension of Boolean logic dealing with the concept of partial truth. Whereas classical logic holds that everything can be expressed in binary terms (0 or 1, black or white, yes or no), fuzzy logic replaces boolean truth values with degrees of truth.
639127
Its main use is as an alloy in other metals, namely alloyed in steel. \n\nAt one time there was talk of producing a cobalt bomb. I suppose they would use cobalt 60. It has been nick named the doomsday bomb as it would wipe out all life on Earth. \nGWB is probably constructing one right now.
24225
Here is the AOL site that lists the Robots for you.  Have fun!
873789
They are very likely to be possed and under development by governments all over the world as well.  All you have to do is read about the history of military weapons and governmental research. The Japanese were trying to develop biological agents in WWII. \n\nIts not such an uncommon thing for any government to be interested in developing them, the question is are they likely to use them??  \n\nSo I suppose really... maybe terrorists are more likely after all to employ thier use since they wouldnt seem to give a flip about the political backlash that would result.
102608
They range in power. About 100 megaton of TNT. The radiation from the bomb also kills.
1125759
Fortunately .....yes if a country has researched extensively in the field of LASERS and has a SAM missile battery installed in one of the cities that city can be protected from a ballistic missile.\nthis is called anti ballistic missile technology. but the devastation to the environment can not be checked i mean to the atmosphere . the technology involves a LASER guided missile which is instantaneously launched if the in coming missile is identified as a ballistic missile.Identifying is done by low frequency ultrasonic signals , which identify whether the head as hyper sonic or super sonic usually ballistic missiles have hypersonic heads. if the atom bomb is launched in a cruise missile the only one who can save the city and that is ...............................................GOD. in near future there are going to be anti cruise missiles too.that is why the cruise missiles are so dangerous there are only four nations possessing the capability of a nuclear cruise missile the nations are U.S.A.,Russia,France,India. because these countries have the fastest cruise missiles in the world ... the patriot of the Americans, the Marcelo of the french ,and the BrahMos of the combined Indian-Russian.
377318
Artificial speech. Made by machine. Robot language
561147
Has to be wikipedia.org\n\nBut if can focus more on the delivery systems. For example, Pershing (land-based) and Trident (submarine-based).\n\nAlso read about chemical and biological agents as bombs, and the hydrogen bomb. Read about both nuclear fusion and fission too. Not forgetting about dirty nukes.
946832
You can find a list of available aimbots on aol.com:\n\nhttp://aimpages.aol.com/aimbots
863647
The bio-bomb is made of a plastic alloy and employs the radioactive energy source Solinium II, which kills only living tissue and leaves the landscape and buildings unchanged. Used mostly in collaboration with the fairy time-stop, the bomb, nicknamed a blue rinse, can be calibrated to an exact radius; that is to say that it can explode and blue rinse an exact area.
201980
The current shortfalls are lack of long range coherence and huge power consumption.  Work to weaponize this technology has been going on for at least ten years that I know of, and it still is of very limited use.  The bomb clearing application is a fairly clever one, and actually makes use of the poor long range coherence of the beam.  The charged plasma can be projected a short distance, at which point it will try to find the lowest resistance path to ground.  Metal objects, especially ones with sharp edges, will attract this charged plasma strongly, and so hidden metal objects within close range will draw the strike to themselves.  So, for this it seems to work quite well.  It's still a large, cumbersome, and power intensive piece of equipment, however, without much record of successful use in the field.  The goal, ultimately, is to turn this sort of thing into a full scale beam weapon, but I think that's quite a ways off and possibly self-defeating.  Lasers typically convert <10%, and often <5% of the power they consume into laser light, so they're very inefficient.  The idea with LIPC is that a fairly high power laser, one powerful enough to ionize the air but not so powerful that it's particularly dangerous to armored vehicles, can be used to open an ionized channel in the air which will conduct electricity, and can then be followed by a significant current of high voltage electrons.  It's something like artificial directed lighnting.  Instead of generating a high enough voltage difference that the air spontaneously ionizes in a random branching pattern, the laser provides guidance and the plasma, which can be generated more efficiently but is difficult to control, provides the power.  It's potentially more efficient than a laser powerful enough to do serious damage, but it's still a whole lot of power and isn't likely to yield an easily portable weapon any time soon.  The current bomb finder has very limited range, and has to move very slowly in order to scan the area, and is almost as large as a tank.  So, is it practical?   If moving ten miles an hour with a vehicle that sucks down fuel at a tremendous rate is worth the tradeoff of possible hidden bombs, it makes sense, but this only makes sense for limited areas where bomb threats are especially high, and for moving especially high value troops or materials past the point.  Can it be made smaller and more efficient?  Probably, but not by much.  The technology is inherently a high power consumption device.  Lasers are not likely to get much more efficient.  Two-component mixed chemical excimers can be used to at least remove the power generation need for the laser, but then you're limited to the number of shots you can provide, whereas an electrically powered laser can be used with fairly high duty cycle and is much more suitable for the sweeping function of detecting bombs.  But, all the same, the technology does work, and can be made to work in fairly rough environments.  Lasers can be delicate machinery, true, but they've got a good history of use on the battlefield for signal use and can be made sufficiently durable.  Likewise with the electron guns used to produce the plasma.  It's a somewhat complicated device, yes, but not that much different as far as the fudamental technology than that used in plasma cutters which are widely used in industrial metal shops with good uptime.  \n\nThe real question is whether or not the system meets a real military need given the limitations of slow speed and huge power consumption.  Of course, the military has been known to spend huge amounts of money on devices and systems that are complete crap, just because they sounded cool, but if the company is to ever really be successful, they'll have to have something that has a real world usefulness.  It's not clear to me that this device, as clever as it is, really provides that.   This is going to be the real question, and the
432769
Consider iRobot. They build robots for the Department of Defense and also the robot vacuum cleaner.\n\nhttp://www.irobot.com/
730891
here is a good  one\n\nhttp://www.snapfiles.com/reviews/AI_RoboForm/roboform.html
61752
You are asking how knowledge assists in planning counterterrorist strategies.\n\nHow does flour assist in baking bread?