Many black people believe that the CIA ordered the planes to crash into the Twin Towers.  Are they all wrong?
111613
I doubt that is the case. There were actual hijackers aboard. Innocent people died. Plus, if it was a CIA conspiracy, we'd probably know about it by now because the news would've reported on it.
1154616
I see a lot of people giving emotional answers talking about sickos, and how it couldn't be our government because "why would they do that?" or "how could they kill their own people?"\n\nWell, for anyone who doesn't believe the government could possibly think about killing innocent people to accomplish some goal they have that seems important to them, look up Operation Northwoods - an operation that was planned by the government to carry out false terrorist attacks and blame them on Fidel Castro and the Cuban Government as a pretext for military intervention in Cuba.  This one didn't actually happen, but it was planned out, so we know that people in the government put a lot of time and effort in thinking about it - and you can now see some of the declassified documents about it online.\n\n  Now, I'm not saying the government planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks for sure, because I don't have enough evidence to judge.  But I don't think it would be impossible, and I certainly don't think there is enough evidence available to disprove the hypothesis.  One thing that seems to be almost certain to me is that the details that the government gave us about 9/11 are not true.  So the question is, why aren't they telling the truth?  What are they hiding from us that is so important to keep secret that they would risk looking like they were involved by omitting hard evidence to the contrary?\n\nAs for reasons the government might have done it, only a few people necessarily needed to know about the plan, not everyone in the goverment, and if those few people were not good judges of morality, and had some cause to think it would be best for the country, some reasons that seem ridiculous to most may seem convincing to them.  For instance, to gain control of oil, or to increase the power of the U.S. government in the middle east, or to increase the profits of the defense industry, etc, etc.\n\nAmong the reasons that the government's details don't match the truth are:\n\n - 9 of the alleged hijackers have apparently turned up alive and obviously not guilty of the alleged hijackings, living in Saudi Arabia.\n\n - The towers fell so fast that physicists have said it is impossible that explosions and fire caused by plane crashes are the only cause of the fall (pointing toward some kind of secondary explosives that must have been the cause).\n\n - There has been a study done to determine the probability of successfully connecting a cell phone call while flying that indicates the calls from the planes were probably faked.\n\n - The towers were engineered to have multiple airplane impacts each, and burn for hours at high temperatures while retaining their structutal integrity - inconveniently, the manager of many of the construction projects in the towers was killed in the attacks.\n\n  I don't know for sure what kind of involvement the government had in the attacks if any, but I do know that they have been irresponsible in satisfying themselves with the conclusions they came to shortly after the attacks and not investigating further to see what really happened, after it has become obvious that their conclusions were clearly incorrect.\n\nFor more scientific information about the cause of 9/11 visit my sources.  Some articles you read about it will be exaggerations, or will seem like "liberal jibberjabber" but don't discredit all of the information simply because one part of it is wrong, or one of the articles goes too far.\n\nRemember, just because someone is talking about a conspiracy doesn't automatically make them wrong - conspiracies are not impossible.  The real conspiracy theorists in this case are the government officials who theorized the obviously false situation about the terrorists who simply flew the planes into the buildings and caused them to fall.
1141141
there are sources that say the government had information that there would be an attack...but it was very general.  And it was not Pres. Bush that knew this.....The Clinton administration was in power when threats were received as well....it was lack of communication allowed between FBI and CIA.  It wasn't as though they called up the President and said "on 9/11 we are going to fly planes into the twin towers..."  And then he did nothing...that would make him a monster...and regardless of how you think of him politically...he is not up there with the Husseins and the Polpots...
1149911
Absolutely absurd. How could the US have helped 9/11? Why would  they? How would no one have come up with any credible evidence after all these years? What reason is there to think that it was not a well-planned attack, run by a large group of Arab terrorists? I think that is the story that fits the evidence.\n\nThey're not addressed in any plausible way. Vast conspiracies don't actually happen or work. Someone always finds out, and yet there's no evidence of this conspiracy.\n\nEdit: Jets did not intercept the planes because they are stationed hundreds of miles from where they were and were not alerted until shortly before the planes crashed. The FAA notified NORAD at 8:40 and planes were scrambled 6 minutes later, 153 miles from the World Trade Center and the first plane crashed at about that time. http://mckinneysucks.blogspot.com/2002_06_01_mckinneysucks_archive.html#77997492\n\nThe buildings fell quickly because they were crashed into by giant airliners. It seems like a building like that should be able to withstand more, but neither you, nor I, nor Ruppert, nor even the engineers who built the towers know what it is like for a plane to crash into a building. The commission report clearly states that the plane struck main support beams and started fires that raged at intense temperatures, further weakining the already weakened supports. Once that happens it doesn't take long for a building to collapse onto itself.\n\nAs for WTC7, the report is clear enough that fires were started on several floors by debris. People say it looks too controlled, but they failr to realize that buildings that tall are made to crumble down and not out. If a main beam buckles, there's no momentum to throw debris out - the force is all down.\n\nHow long it took to form a commission is a question I have myself, but that alone does not make a conspiracy.\n\nAs for explosions, see this: http://www.geocities.com/factsnotfantasy/ExplosivesDebunked.html
488611
you cannot see it very good, but it seems to low for a plane for the explosion to happen that high and destructive. did you also see the picture of the 747 hittin the north tower, it had a mysterious black shape underneath the cargo area, people believe that was a conspiracy and it was a bomb. i would know i was there
71976
I believe that Bin Laden was responsible for the attacks, yes. Unfortunately, people have (a reasonable) tendency to question anything 'official' or 'government-related', so they turn to explanations involving aliens, missiles, CIA, Freemasons, and the Mossad.\n\nHere's the thing : Why the hell would a country send four airplanes to smash into their own buildings, and to kill their own people? That's just stupid.\nAnd if the government is lying, then what happened to the victims? The planes? Saying "it's a conspiracy" tells the families of the dead, and the survivors, that they died for nothing.
973101
YEs we are and some of the answers prove that point. For instance, ignorant and brainwashed people who are too lazy t oinvestigate and discover truth accept only the official government story like planes flew into the Twin Towers or that Israli mossad story that people are blowing themselves up in Israel and trucks.\n\nLosssers don't realize nor have the menatality to figure out that  the TT's were a controled demolition because it is easier adn more simple for them to accept the offcial story than to see the truth before their eyes,\n\nThe same people fail to read media news outside the Americas  to find that  the bodies inside a truck bombing are sometimes already dead or the true stories written in many media outside  the USA that Israel coerced mentally retarded Palistinian children to wear bomb jackets so that they could blame it on the palistinians . Most of their media on such things have been exposed as set up . We find also in othr reports that at military checkpoints in Iraq  that Iragi farmers have been set up and killed . Once ariving at the checkpoint one watermellon famer  had his entire truck inspected for alledged bombs and when he took off to his deatination he noticed the truck seemed heavier. The check point officers told him he hads to report to the nearest police station for a final inspection. Once he realized he looked in is truck and under the watermellon he was now carrying a large load of explosives buried in his watermellon which became evident they wer radio controlled. He then noticed in the distance that he was being followed by which he believed those who would detonate the explosives by radio control some distance away,\n\n This is an everyday event in Irag and Israle by Isreal in order to make the world believe that the Palistinians and Irag and now Iran are truely attacking them whene in reality they are nothing  more than black ops operations by Israels Mossad which is the equivelent to the American CIA.\n\nNot to mentionthe amount of brain dead Americans who believe the remote controled planes were actually enough to bring three towers down  in the exact mode and especially one that was nerv hit by a plane came down in the exact same manner dispite no fires. Bread dead Americans can't see that this was a black ops to cause America to be incensed and attack Irag for Israel. Most Americans can not see that it is always Israel that is beating the drums of war and that this war is for Israel not America. Too stupid to see this fact they send their children off to die and fight for a foreign country that is nothing more than the middle east largest terrorist faction who are all too willing to send Americas people into war to die for their hatred of all those not Israli around them.\n\nMost are too stupid to see that criminal elements are raping their constitution and stealing elections which bennifit  only Israel.\n\nYes, Americans are brainwashed, listen to some of their ignorant answers!
1007819
Before US attacked Iraq i was sure it was a terrorist attack committed by AL-Quaeda.After they attacked Iraq i wasn't that sure.\nI saw too "loose changes" and i think u should better see "911 in plane site" it has stronger points.I don't know what to say about WTC but I'm convinced that the Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane and nothing will ever convinced me that it was.So yes I tend to believe that it was part a conspiracy.
649228
I have not seen this but i can only imagine the theory behind 9/11.  I know that it was not by accident that the twin towers came a tumblin down...but i also know that it would never have happened if the gov't wasn't in on it. It is just to tragic and too big of a game for it to happen on American soil.
797101
Well, the 911 hijackings and terrorists attacks have been declared actions by B.Laden and his supporters.\n\nWith that said, there has since come to light a lot of evidence to support that it was an inside job by 'unknown' government officials. Most suspect Cheney and Rumsfeld.\n\nThere has also been quite a bit of evidence questioning whether or not actual planes hit the Pentagon... but rather it was a bomb.\n\nEither way, at this point, it is pure speculation and I highly doubt we will ever know the truth within our lifetimes.
1049378
The Destruction of the World Trade Center:\nWhy the Official Account Cannot Be True\nDavid Ray Griffin\nAuthorized Version (with references & notes)\n\n \n\n \n\nIn The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11 (2004), I summarized dozens of facts and reports that cast doubt on the official story about 9/11. Then in The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (2005a), I discussed the way these various facts and reports were treated by the 9/11 Commission, namely, by distorting or simply omitting them. I have also taken this big-picture approach, with its cumulative argument, in my previous essays and lectures on 9/11 (Griffin, 2005b and 2005d).[1] This approach, which shows every aspect of the official story to be problematic, provides the most effective challenge to the official story.\n\n     But this way of presenting the evidence has one great limitation, especially when used in lectures and essays: It means that the treatment of every particular issue must be quite brief, hence superficial. People can thereby be led to suspect that a more thorough treatment of any particular issue might show the official story to be plausible after all.\n\n     In the present essay, I focus on one question: why the Twin Towers and building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed. One advantage of this focus, besides the fact that it allows us to go into considerable detail, is that the destruction of the World Trade Center provides one of the best windows into the truth about 9/11. Another advantage of this focus is that it will allow us to look at revelations contained in the 9/11 oral histories, which were recorded by the New York Fire Department shortly after 9/11 but released to the public only in August of 2005.\n\nI will begin with the question of why the Twin Towers collapsed, then raise the same question about building 7.\n\n \n\n \n\n1. The Collapse of the Twin Towers\n\n \n\nShortly after 9/11, President Bush advised people not to tolerate “outrageous conspiracy theories about the attacks of 11 September” (Bush, 2001).[2] Philip Zelikow, who directed the work of the 9/11 Commission, has likewise warned against “outrageous conspiracy theories” (Hansen, 2005). What do these men mean by this expression? They cannot mean that we should reject all conspiracy theories about 9/11, because the government’s own account is a conspiracy theory, with the conspirators all being members of al-Qaeda. They mean only that we should reject outrageous theories.\n\nBut what distinguishes an outrageous theory from a non-outrageous one? This is one of the central questions in the philosophy of science. When confronted by rival theories---let’s say Neo-Darwinian Evolution and Intelligent Design---scientists and philosophers of science ask which theory is better and why. The mark of a good theory is that it can explain, in a coherent way, all or at least most of the relevant facts and is not contradicted by any of them. A bad theory is one that is contradicted by some of the relevant facts. An outrageous theory would be one that is contradicted by virtually all the relevant facts.\n\n     With this definition in mind, let us look at the official theory about the Twin Towers, which says that they collapsed because of the combined effect of the impact of the airplanes and the resulting fires. The report put out by FEMA said: “The structural damage sustained by each tower from the impact, combined with the ensuing fires, resulted in the total collapse of each building” (FEMA, 2002).[3] This theory clearly belongs in the category of outrageous theories, because is it is contradicted by virtually all the relevant facts. Although this statement may seem extreme, I will explain why it is not.\n\n \n\nNo Prior Collapse Induced by Fire\n\nThe official theory is rendered implausible by two major problems. The first is the simple fact that fire has never---prior to or after 9/11---caused steel-frame high
616775
I have seen several of the conspiracy theory films and they do make me think.\n\nThey insist that the WTC buildings one and two had to have explosive charges placed in them like a controlled demo for them to come down as fast as they did.\n\nThey show, and you can see, puffs of smoke coming out of windows floors below the floors collapsing.  Is this really PROOF that there were explosive charges.  You do not see any flashes with the puffs of smoke.\n\nThey show other tall building fires where they fires lasted longer and the buildings did not collapse.  But in the WTC collapses there were gigantic planes that hit and did a lot of structural damage.  There was also jet fuel that created the fires.  There was a tremendous amount of weight suspended above where the planes hit.  I remember thinking that it was amazing that the buildings did not fall down.  Of course, later they did.\n\nA few years ago (before 9/11/01) there was a 10 floor building being built in Bridgeport CT. There was a construction accident on one of the upper floors and the weight of what fell just massively overwhelmed the support below.  The whole building fell to the ground just like a controlled demo, just like the WTC towers.  There was no bomb, no plane hitting the building, no fire.\n\nI think that there was a lot of damage on the floors where the planes hit.  All it would take would be for one floor to fail and everything above it drops and hits the floor below.  Imagime how much weight that is.  It only gets heavier as it goes.\n\nStill, how the planes and bodies at the Pentagon and in PA completely vaporized makes you wonder.  One film says that flight 93 went to Cleveland and all the passangers were taken off the plane and that even the cell phone calls were fakes.  They do not say what happened to the real passangers after.  Were they all shot?\n\nA lot of the conspiricy theories have as many holes as the supposed cover ups.  Their idea of proof is often pretty lame.
399832
Try this link. It will reveal and answer a lot of questions you may have.\n\nhttp://fpiarticle.blogspot.com/2006/04/911-in-plane-site.html\n\nI dont believe a plane crashed into the pentagon. Flight 93 was made up. The planes that crashed into the WTC's were not commercial airlines. There is no proof! With all the video footage... you never really see the commercial logos. It's all bogus.\n\nThink about it. Why would the government do this? To create FEAR! This is the new era. There is no more cold war. No more bad super power. So where does the government turn for war? To an invisible word called "Terrorist". The war on terrorism is only a few words. \n\nFear makes me people more controllable. They spend more. They submit to anything that will protect them. And in exchange for it all is our freedom.
71109
A plane hit the Pentagon.  They have proof.  Are you one of those idiots who thinks everything is a conspiracy or are you just a kook!!
427230
Yes, I do.  It's very sobering to become a sceptical person about our government and to realize that they would knowingly condone this heinous act of murder.\nI once was one who believed that Al-Qaeda was soley behind 9/11.  Then about 2 months ago my wife brought home a DVD that reexamined all the evidence about how the WTC buildings collapsed, and it also showed a lot about the Pentagon attack.  Yes, I once was a person who thought that all these "conspiracy theorists" were just a bunch of nut cakes.  But, again, the physical evidence about what happened is quite shocking. \nThe web page below contains a lot of technical articles.  It is also easy to find other web sites that present a lot of information.  If you go to an "official" web site about 9/11, it's interesting to see how they side-step the hard questions that are being presented and cannot be sufficiently answered by jets simply crashing into buildings.\nSo, what does all of this mean?  We, the American public, have been duped.  But, what does that really change?  Has any of our personal lives really changed all that much?  How much of a difference does it personally make to us if it was Al-Qaeda or our own government that murdered innocent American lives?\nAnd so, we go on.  We live each day.  I ask myself what can I possibly do to get the truth out?  Being on the other side, one of the "conspiracy" nuts, is hard .. it's hard because no one wants to believe you.
447447
They are nutters 9/11 did happen. Im just uncertain about some of the fact surrounding the Pentagon (no one seen a plane, no one heard one, no debris, was it a bomb or just a poor excuse for the  the U.S. Government to not shoot the planes down that crashed into the towers? After all they did know the planes where hijacked shortly after take off, and U.S. security is the best in the world... so what happened? Confused consiracy but every thing was so well orcastrated! Thats my opinion. Love Heidi
29237
This is a very true possibility because there is actual proof of the government hiding what happend on that day... if you recall a plane had also hit the pentagon as well as the towers right... negative there was no plane wreckage at that site. what had actualy hit it was a missle. and the government wants us to believe that it was a plan to not cause panic.