Is Deutsche Bahn a listed company?
108425
I don't think so.  Check through the listing of stocks beginning with "Deutsche" listed on the world exchanges.  Deutsche Bahn isn't in there.\nhttp://finance.yahoo.com/lookup?s=deutsche&t=S&m=ALL\n\nI think this further confirms it:\nhttp://de.finsearch.yahoo.com/de/?s=de_sort&tp=S&nm=deutsche&r=*
257647
More than likely it is not a publicly traded company, as yet. The stock information will only come from the company itself.
846842
This happnds to companies that have a low vaule on the stock price but, high asset value. This happended to my company (Disney) a while back when Comcast tried to take us over. Bascilly it means they come in and buy up all the avaialbel stock to have an ownership and then they control the board and it's decsions which the board could sell the whole company for the price they are offering. In the Disney case we fought it off ad won they did not take us over.\n\nSometimes companies offer a leverged buyout like US Air is doing to Delta right now. They see vaule in the compnay and offer a premium to all stock holders above the market price hopeing to buy it out and merge and that is what hapoends most of the time. Hostile take overs don't happen often but, when they do look for lots of media coverage. Look for some article about Disney and Comcast.
964898
Interesting question,,and Good Thinking.\n\nAmtrak suppliers/vendors are of such a scale that Amtrak's business has only a small influence upon them.\n\nAmtrak's contribution to Other companies is thus considered\n"diluted" among the total.\n\nIf there's anyone which Amtrak does have a material influence upon,,,I'm not aware of it.\n\nWhat's interesting is that even though Amtrak Biz is a very specific Niche....it just happens to be Rail Transport.\n\nAnd Rail Transport and its support industries have all been doing very well for last several years\n\nHere's a few relative symbols,,,no recommendations just something to look at.\nThey're most all substantially advanced over last 2~3~5 years\n\nARII BNI CNI CP CSX FLA FSTR GBX GMT GSH GWR HSC KSU NATK.OB NSC NYRR.PK OEH PRPX PWX RAIL RRA  TMM TRN UNP WAB
463866
Sounds like your talking about Miller beer that now owns Strohs. The parent company is SABmiller. It is not traded on our stock exchanges.
648960
Um...ok, I'm pretty knowledgeable about this stuff, but I don't know what a 'reverse merger' is in this context.  Normally this term is used when a private company merges with a public one.  But a pink sheet company isn't private, so I assume you mean that they will get the OTC listing from the dormant public shell company. Which company's shareholders are you concerned about?  Because, in any merger, there are two companies involved. In itself, there's nothing patently wrong with it, and getting the listing would normally be a good sign, if it's the right kind of listing.  But are we talking NASDAQ listing or just OTC?  I mean, OTC could still be Pink Sheets, right?  So it may not be beneficial.  I guess you really need to clarify some of this before I try to make sense out of it.  Which company do you own shares in?  What type of OTC listing are they getting?  etc.
1105700
As far as I know, Bracco is a privately held Italian company, so its stock is not traded.
368846
That is a good question since they have so many stock options, that it would choke a cow. \n\nOne possible reason is that they want their name to appear on the list of insider trades so that people will think the stock of the company is undervalued and buy it to drive up the price so that they can exercise their options and make more money.  I admit that this logic is a little devious, but then again these are devious people we are talking about. \n\nAnother reason is that they think the stock is a good buy. OK, the possibility does exist. \n\nAnother reason is that they are trying to increase their holdings in the company as part of a power struggle for control of the company. This would possibly be the case in a company with only a few million shares outstanding.  \n\nAnother reason would be to put the squeeze on shorts. The classic example of this was Alan Ryan of Stutz Motor Car Company. Members of the New York Stock exchange had shorted the stock of Stutz Motor Car in 1920. Ryan controlled the company. He bought all the available outstanding stock of the company so that the shorts could not cover their positions. He had them by the balls. Then the exchange intervened because their members were in jeopardy of being wiped out and halted trading in Stutz.
399730
Here is what I have found:\n\nhttp://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=TCAHQ.PK\nhttp://www.marketocracy.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Portfolio.woa/ps/StockGraphPage/source=BmPlAoCbDjAlCaFoMaKiAbBg/maxDays=90\n\nIt appears to still be trading but, Touch America Holdings, Inc. filed for Chapter 11 liquidating plan in July 2004, which was confirmed by the United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware in October 2004. The company sold substantially all of its Internet services, private line, and dark fiber assets to 360networks Corporation, as well as certain dark fiber assets to Qwest Communications, Inc. in December 2003. With the exception of certain wireless services, Touch America ceased operations, as of February 29, 2004. Previously, the company, through its subsidiaries, operated as a broadband telecommunications company, providing customized voice, data, and video transport services. Touch America was founded in 1961.\n\nHope this helps
143046
IBM is a public company.  The share holders own it.  The stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange and the symbol is IBM.
489899
Well, I have never heard of such a company here in Switzerland. After looking up the official company directory, I have found a "Molekule Pharmaceutical GmbH" in Adliswil, founded 6 weeks ago with the absolutely minimum capital. Reputation equals zero.
563989
Apparently not.  \n\nAll I can say, is that I don't have a "demat" account, whatever that is, but buying shares is not a problem.
151257
I was just looking at beaners and they are not a publically traded company. Which means they are not listed on the stock exchange.
1117471
This is the list of the ticker symbols of most Chinese companies ( or companies that have something to do with China/Asia ) traded in NYSE/NASDAQ.\n\nACH ASIA BIDU CBA CEA CEO CHA CHINA CHL CHU CNTF CTDC CTRP CYD FMCN GCH IIJI JEQ JFC JOBS JOF JRJC KONG LFC LONG LTON NCTY NTES PCNTF PFCB PTR SINA SNDA SNP SOHU WRSP XING ZNH
57791
According to Yhaoo Finance and The Wall Street Journal Online Sprint/Nextel (NYSE:S) has 59,900 emplyess. \n\nCorporate information like this needs to be disclosed to share holders, so the information is made public. \n\nWhen looking for publicly traded company statistics search the company name on yahoo and when the name comes up with the companies stock symbol (example: "NYSE:S")click the symbol, then look for the info on the page.
549114
L was Liberty Media's symbol when it traded on the NYSE. It recently moved over the Nasdaq...and, here it gets confusing. AT&T bought Liberty's parent company Telecommnications, Inc and issued new shares. Liberty Interactive trading on the Nasdaq is LINTA for the class A shares, and LINTB for class B shares. Liberty Capital is LCAPA for class A and LCAPB for class B shares.\n\nI know....that's about as clear as mud.....
1042329
It's a publicly held company.