how many Northern Alliance troops were killed during 2001 Afghanistan war?
117528
I don't think there's clear information about that as the Bush administration trying to hide or down size the numbers of loses
123645
In 2005 846 coalition forces died, meaning that there were roughly 56 deaths per 100,000 military personnel. By contrast, there were, according to preliminary figures 16,475 murders in the US, meaning there were 5.56 murders per 100,000 people.
1089432
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties/index.html                                                                                                  You can search by name or date.
294922
http://hotzone.yahoo.com/b/hotzone/20060320/hz_afghanistan_0306/blogs2986
166073
Gulf War (1990-91)\n\n    * Shortly after the war, the US Defense Intelligence Agency made a very rough estimate of 100,000 Iraqi deaths, and this order of magnitude is widely accepted -- even improved upon:\n          o B&J: 50,000 to 100,000\n          o Compton's: 150,000 Iraqi soldiers killed\n          o World Political Almanac 3rd: 150,000 incl. civilians.\n          o Our Times: 200,000.\n    * Other authoritative sources working with more detailed data have come up with lower numbers:\n          o The British govt. put the death toll at 30,000 (War Annual 6, 1994)\n          o A May 1992 report by the US House Armed Services Committee estimated that 9,000 Iraqi soldiers were killed by the air campaign. [http://es.rice.edu/projects/Poli378/Gulf/aspin_rpt.html]\n          o The PBS news show Frontline estimates 2300 civilians, 10-20,000 military in air war and, 10,000 military in the ground war; for a total of 27,300 ±5000. (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gulf/appendix/death.html)
521128
60,441,457\n\nThis is according to http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/rankorder/2119rank.html
187383
At least 2,305 U.S. service members have died since the war started in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count.
447281
By War on Terror, I assume you mean the war in Iraq? If that is the case, this website will provide the coalition forces loss of life in the war, their home cities/states and how they were killed. It may take some time to count up each individual to get a number for each state, but the information is accurate and reliable.\nhttp://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties/
814855
The last real war that Russia was in was when Afghanistan handed them there A$$ on a platter 1980-1987. China was a supporter of North Vietnam but wasn't really at war. When the supported North Korea in the Korean War. They basically lost that one when the US led NATO troops pushed them back above the 38th parallel. Both now just sit back and watch the world go by and sell arms.
555379
Everyone notice, not one intelligent response or idea from a liberal. Just crap.\n\nEDIT: Hey G, no troops in Pakistan because they don't want them and they would destabilize a teetering government that has nuclear weapons. How many buildings has Bin Laden taken out lately? He is in caves with people who would die to keep him hidden. He will fall eventually. Can't hide forever.\n\nRE-EDIT: 20,000 troops in Afghanistan because they had the military might of the L.A.P.D, we didn't need more, they had the Northern Alliance there to fill the void.\n\n100,000 in Iraq because they had a real military with 500,000 troops. Other than Saddam's regime, there was no one else to take power, hence the large occupation force
476192
In the 1991 war, 382 died and 467 were wounded in some fashion.\n\nIn the 2003 war and the following occupation, 2,325 died and 17,467 were wounded in some fashion.\n\n\nThat's not bad at all.
50507
Possibly the Battle of Cannae. If so, the sourced website lists only 48000 killed, but there were 55000 troops total.
1186493
Yes, this link will take you to a site that breaks it down by killed in action and wounded in action, and is regularly updated:\n\nhttp://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties/
849425
Let's face it. We started off in Afghanistan purportedly to find Osama. But the real target was Iraq, Saddam and oil. Most of us don't even know how many US troops were killed in Afghanistan and the media doesn't keep us apprised. All eyes are on Iraq. Afghanistan was just a ruse to an even bigger prize, which prize has become a field of carrion, rather than barrels of free oil.
568740
WWI   15,000,000\n\nWWII  55,000,000\n\nKorea 2,800,000\n\nVietnam (1960-75) 3,500,000\n\nIraq  Under Saddam (1979-2003) 300,000\n\nAmerican Invasion 13,500-45,000 (all Iraqi troops)\n\nAmerican Occupation(2003- ) 12,950 ± 2,150
1078924
The Al-Qaida leader Al-Zarqawi was reported killed. Never take what the Government or the Military tell you as truth. He may have been dead for months and we would not be told. The cost to the USA of this mans death was 2480 of our service people dead and over 15,000 wounded in Iraq. The cost of the war in Iraq will be $2 trillion over the next 10 years. Bib-Laden is still in Afghanistan and he has admitted that he planned the Sept. 11th attack. In the end Iran will control Iraq and Iran is the big winner. Al-Zarqawi was a minor player in Al-Qaida before he left Afghanistan and went to Iraq.
688293
This might sound strange, but it depends upon how you define "died".  Take a look at the chart at the source.  It shows battle deaths, other deaths, and non-mortal woundings.  \n\nTo directly respond to your question, there have been 651,008 battle deaths through Desert Storm.  There have been another 2,465 in the latest Iraq conflict, 295 in Afghanistan and approximately 18 in Somalia for a grand total of 653,786...and unfortunately growing.