Who's a better tennis player/hotter: Anna Kournikova or Maria Sharapova?
110033
maria sharapova is clearly better, shes known as the good anna kournikova. i personally think sharapova is more attractive.
1062870
Tracy Austin - Female\nPete Sampras - Male
270387
Sharapova,she has youth on her side. Anna is starting to show signs of wear.
1034502
Hmmm good question. I guess I would have to say Sharapova. I know that is cliche but she has the looks and she has wone a major championship!!!\n\n: )
871274
tough question...\nMaria is very capable.......but justine might be better...
954012
Justine Henin Hardenne for sure....
1102866
even though i am indian i still go for maria! she really is a superb player! sania now a days is drawn by publicity!she is more on advertisement than her game! no doubt maria is better!
56957
you need specifics. you could be talking about backhands, forehands, volleys, overhead smashes, or all around playing. i think they are both extremely talented players, and to say one is better, that would be putting the other down.
1059888
Kournikova.\n\nShe's retired now.
407243
Roddick and I hate to say it but Sharapova
382712
kournakova is better!\n\nGo to the 99cent store and get her workout tape,\nbetter than porn it is?
605995
Compared to me, pretty good.  Compared to players like Navratilova or Graf, not in the same league.
1156506
i think ana ivanovic will most likely be the winner becuase it seems like she is playing better than safina. she has won both of her first and second round matches in straight sets, unlike safina. also she can hit the ball pretty hard when she needs to.
1011687
1.Justine Henin\n2. K. Clijsters\n3. L. Davenport\n4. M.Sharapova\n5.A. Mauresmo\n6. V. Williams\n7. S. Kuznetsova\n8. N.Petrova\n9. M.Hingis\n10. E. Dementieva
623432
she will be in the top 10 again coz i swear she is the most talented player i have ever seen\ni mean how many players can come back after three years and play the way she has so far this year\n\nshe was the whole reason i got into tennis in the first place
826514
Maria, because she is more focused on the sport than outside interests. Anna, for all her talent, never had the mental capacity to win even one tournament at the pro level. She could have built up her confidence by playing the satellite events and Challenger series tournaments (the minor leagues of pro tennis), and winning a few of those, because it is unlikely any player in those events could compete with her. Anna had plenty of potential as a future tennis star. Remember, she was a 16 year old semifinalist at Wimbledon. However, Enrique Iglesias, fat endorsement contracts, not to mention her celebrity status were too much for her. Maria was very close to being the #1 player in the world, and she has won Wimbledon and the U.S. Open already. There is hope she can win the French and Australian Opens in her career. I think Anna is pretty much done as a player. It's obvious\nMaria is the better tennis player. Anna might be the betterlooking of the two since I'm assuming she gets more money than Maria for endorsement contracts, but Maria is very attractive also. The\ndifference is Maria didn't let her life outside of her pro tennis career distract her to the point where it adversely affected her \nresults, Anna did.
403337
For now, I would say Sampras because he did it for longer.  They both can play various styles but within that variety,  I'd say Sampras was more of a classic power player and Federer the more "artistic", touch player.\n\nWhen it's all said and done, and if Federer has a few more dominant years, I think that most people will answer your question with "Federer".  I'm definitely pulling for him to break Sampras' record for most majors won in a career.