Do we really exist?  Is there proof God exists or doesn't?
117134
I woul say no "God" exists, nothing which "Rules" us or "Owns" us.\n\nWe do not have to obey any other beings but ourselves, do other animals have "Gods", do they build shrines? Are they nice to the environment and dont kill other animals?\n\nNo is the answer\n\nOk we take it a bit too far, manufacturing animals, growing them for food. But like animals we live on a planet that has gone through billions of years evolution, we was not "placed" here we evolved from the very animals around us. We are unique to our planet, but are we unique to our galaxy?\n\nI think not.\n\nThanks for stimulationg me... I like these descussions, and please i hope i didnt offend anyone who beleives in a "God" etc. Its really up to you, good day :)
307827
I want to know what makes you think that "creation" is proof that god exists?!\n\nGod is a creation of man, not something that exists.  The stories in the bibles, are just that, stories, they are not meant to be taken literally.
122785
Science can't prove or disprove the existance of God. What proves God is the change that is evident when someone receives Jesus as their Savior. It is a life-changing event! You can't disprove experience. You can't tell me that what I know & experience in my life isn't real. And the same things I've experienced in my relationship with the Lord is being experienced by thousands of others just like me throughout the world. You can't tell me that what I KNOW is real is all in my mind. Just because you didn't personally go to the moon doesn't mean that it wasn't experienced by others. It happened. It is a fact. So is my relationship with the living God of this universe. He lives in me. End of controversy! <*)))><
19285
Hasn't this question been asked, like, multiple times?\n\nHere are the search results for the other versions of this question on Y! Answers:\nhttp://answers.yahoo.com/search/search_result;_ylt=Almo4YtpIzyrHJpEJ8PCC5jpy6IX?p=does+god+exist%3F
1103813
I shall not say God is real. However, you shan't hear me say that he doesn't exist either. I am waiting for proof from either side(besides the Bible).
261713
There IS no way to prove or disprove the existence of any deity, as is the same with anything supernatural. The supernatural is definitively NOT scientifically testable. You can give evidence one way or another, but it is debatable as to whether we will ever have the ability to prove or disprove the existence of anything supernatural - including deities.
678096
Whether God exists is not the question. If you look you can see God's hand in life all around you. The question is more of what is God?  Through logical discourse, testimony of other people and other such evidence you can start to decide whether any religion has a clue, whether God is a factor of the human collective or spirits or whatever conclusion you can deduce from the evidence. \n\nThe first step is to look for inconsistancies in magnitude or frequency which imply intelligence over the normal chaos of randomness. If there is no God then the chaos factor will rule. There will be occasional accidents which can seem as if there was intelligent action behind them. By nature these must be rare as the result must be random if there is no God. I am talking about matters beyond normal human control that is. Also about understood factors. Cancer going into sudden remission is beyond our ability to understand right now. It cannot be claimed or refuted as a mircle because we just don't know enough to say. \n\nInstead look to things we do understand the mechanics of. Then look for the unexplained. A %100 fatal disease suddenly being cured is an example. Of course the diagnosis has to be accurate and the remission total. Changes in peoples lives from external sources. The mechanics of social interaction are well understood. The flight of a butterfly perhaps holds a clue if you study it with an open mind. To see God's hand you have to look for it. It won't often slap you accross the face and you can deny it's existance despite postive proof just as easily as you can find proof in randomness if you have decided before opening your eyes what you intend to see and work at seeing just that. To prove of disprove you have to look as objecctively as you can. Drop as many predisposiions as you can and just look for a while. After you look follow up possible leads and objectively say this might be or this can be explained by such and such and assign a probability of that being a reasonable explanation. Many "acts of God" are pure randomness. There comes a point where random is too random though in my opinion. Where mathimatical odds of coincidence become too high to be remotely acceptable. \n\nI believe there is God. The nature of God is something I am trying to learn right now. I reject all theology at this time as it is subjective and the nature of God to me is too important an aspect to just accept somebody else's opinion. I want to know for myself what it is. So I examine all the possibilities and discard those that discredit themselves. In general the preponents of a description of God to me are irrelivent. Bad people taint good ideas all the time. Still if a theology is by nature corrupt it will produce %100 corruption in it's proponents. If I meet a large enough sampling and see a commmon trait prescribed by that theology I'll reject that theologie's dogma as harmfull. That does not make the base theology wrong, just the surrounding dogma and celibration of it harmfull. Too many people reject God as non-existant based on very subjective criteria. Bad experiences with the application of dogma for example. Bad experiences with theology is another. They forget Theology is a man made thing. People do what they will with information, information being just another tool in man's hand. It can be used for good or bad. The source of the theology is distinct and different. To blame God for the actions of a clergy group is like blaming iron for being made into a sword. Iron is an ore that minds it's own business in the ground. Men discover it and make what suits them from it. This is free will in action. It is free will though that makes me believe in God the most. Nature abhor's a vacume and free will is a vacume of power. It is an unatural state. It's existance a rebuke to randomness and nature. All other elements follow closely very prescribed rules. Life does what it pleases when it
192609
No one can prove thats ...\n\nand i agree with u ...whom saying thats the GOD not exist ... if any one have just few informations about the GOD and believe in him ...easly he can prove thats there is GOD ... \n\nand for whom saying thats there is no GOD .. they CAN'T prove it ... \n\nBcs if just we look to small things ..we know there is GOD .. how about the big things ???\n\nin easy wordS " WHOM CAN USE HIS MIND , EASLY THEY WILL KNOW THERE IS GOD "\n\n\nand some ppl say ..thats whom control evrything is the "MOTHER NATURE" ...so i will say thats ...\n\nall we know thats NATURE can chnage every years .. like some years we have alots of rain and some others years we dont have much rain .....how about millions of years ... so if its just the nature control evrything and there is (nothing) control the nature ...\n\nSO why the orbit of the earth didn't change from millions or billions of years ... what make it fixed in the same orbit thats long time .. ISN'T THATS NATURE 2? \n\nso there is (SOMTHING) CONTROL IT ... NOT THE NATURE CONTROL IT SELF ... \n\nAND THATS (SOMTHING) IS ....... GOD/ALLAH
1141051
Yes, based upon these laws of physics you just described.  No one has ever been able to prove that God existed in this manner.  But, that doesn't mean he/she doesn't exist.  It just means we have yet to figure out how to prove it.  I saw Jesus once, but then I realized that was just his nickname, he was actually Chris Furgeson.
1177838
Question:  Does God truly exist?\n\nAnswer:  You won't know for sure until you die.
1171067
No, god doesn't exist.
731954
I certainly can't claim you exist.  Your question could be entirely computer-generated, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.  \n\nA lot of people have similar thoughts, though - how do we know we exist?  How do we know that reality exists?  We don't, but "reality" is the only constant we know, so we go on faith.  \n\nOne could also argue that if you exist in thought, then you exist period.  I've heard it argued that belief in God is enough to cause God to exist.  We could go on all day like this, but - yep, you exist.  You've convinced everyone here that you do, so you must.
927627
There is one simple question that you must ask yourself and give yourself an honest answer to: "Do I believe there is a god?"\n\nIf your answer is no, then you are an atheist. If your answer is yes, then you are a theist (regardless of whether you follow an organized religion or not). If you aren't sure, you're agnostic.\n\nBelieve whatever makes the most sense to you. If you aren't sure what that is, read more about science and various religions until you find something that makes sense to you.\n\nI didn't "become" an atheist, I always was one. I have never believed in god, simply because I have never seen any sign of him and have no reason to believe he exist elsewhere than in some people's imagination.
653434
First of all, I believe God does not exist.\nIf you want a reason then contact me.
935061
If god in fact exists, and actually did create people, then that is a very interesting point.  So basically what you are saying is, either god doesn't exists, or if he does exist then he is irrelevant.  Sweet.\n\n~Kyle
490697
Wow, good question!\n\nFirstly, your question is concerned with the idea that God believes in Himself. If He believes in Himself then He still has one believer. But then anyone of us could believe that we are God, which is why I would prefer to use the definition of God as our creator.\n\nSince you are asking 'can there be a God if...' can we first start with the assumption that there is a God, and he does have believers? If you can accept this idea, then it should be quite easy to accept that He doesn't just cease when people stop believing. He still created us, even if the creations reject him.\n\nOf course it depends what you mean by 'be'! If we don't talk about, or know about, God, then what would be the point in there 'being' a God. If he has no point, then is his existance still relevant?\n\nI've asked more questions than I have answered, but I hope this gives you something to chew on!
1086312
I believe in God because I met him (in my heart).\n\nWhy wouldn't you ask God if He exists? There is 0% risk. Indeed : \n1. Either He does not exist, and then you will get no answer....\n2. Either He does exist, and He will show you, a way or another, that He exists and that He loves you.\n\nThen you would know how to "defend yourself".