Why are ALL your political news highlights ALWAYS anti Bush,Yahoo is now  agenda Slanted media ?
103204
i have found yahoo to be prety unbiased and fair in its news coverage.  maybe you see stories that you perceive to be anti-bush because bush has actually been doing these things.  with any sitting president i think the news is typically more negative than positive, because negative news sells.  Positive news is often just seen as the president doing his job.  And all of the news is not anti-bush.  I like how when the media reports on something bad the president did, all the right-wing fanatics scream about media bias.  Do you actually deny that the president screwed up when it gets reported, or do you just think it should not be reported?  Accusations that ONLY negative news is reported are blatantly false.\n\np.s. i like how conservatives always accuse liberals of inviting the gov. into our private lives when it is actually conservative governments that pose the biggest threats to individual privacy and freedom.  it is conservative politicians who want the government in the bedroom, who have expanded the powers of the federal government, who have restricted civil liberties.
1182743
heartwarming stories from home are hardly ever in the news, You might as well hang it up that a liberal media outlet will report anything positive from Iraq. That would go against their anti-bush anti-war agenda. Notice the almost non-existent coverage of the sarin and mustard gas that was discovered in Iraq? anyone who reported it implied that since it was expired it was safer than johnson's baby shampoo and doesn't count as WMD's.
391807
They use words like "The U.S. once again has...." because the U.S. once again HAS...... The media seems to be more to the left because most journalism is liberal. It has to be or it would be judging everybody. O.K. seriously, most mainstream news doesnt report good things because good news isnt interesing. Do you remember when Clinton was in office they were just as rough on him. That is the job of the media, to investigate and report. Maybe it seems they are reporting a lot of bad because there is. If you are looking for righty news try a.m. talk radio stations, its what my husband does.
49457
this isnt a question its just a rant. I see the democrats are out in full force today. They hired people who cant spell to post on Yahoo. Are you guys prisoners or something?
157992
haha --good observation!  maybe google has a political agenda!  more likely there are many articles written on the various failures of the Bush presidency, as much because it is inept as because it has been in office for much of the evolution of google as a search engine.\n\nyou write a mean headline!  that grabbed my attention & I'm glad it did.  Are you a newspaper copy editor?
423076
Once again the right wing asserts as truth something that is not, then acts on that "truth" to bring things more to their way of thinking. They claim that mainstream media is liberal, therefore they need to be blatantly conservative to offset the media bias. They ignore the vast conservative ownership and control of much of the media, ignore the proud tradition of the press being critical of whatever government is in power, and point only to the   majority of reporters as "liberal." Maybe so, but nothing on tv compares remotely to the blatant drumbeat of the GOP talking points on Fox.\nFox so completely contaminates their news with their political bias, that anyone who has the sense to get a broad picture of the issues can only be shocked by Fox's one-sidedness. \nFair and balanced is a claim similar to Bush's of being a uniter. Sure.
599076
Um, it's because of the liberal media? Yeah, that's the ticket. The damned liberal media (nearly all of which is owned by huge corporations who are anything but liberal) are always trying to skew the facts and figures against our beloved el presidente. \n\nErm, in his defense I can tell you that he has single-handedly wiped out a budget surplus left him by Clinton (that dirty bastard!) and turned it into the worst deficit this country has ever known. Hail to the thief! He's also dragged us into a costly and unwinnable war based on lies and misinformation. God love the man! And best of all, he has essentially defecated on the Constitution, infringing and trodding upon our rights to privacy in the name of the "war on terror." Mein fuhrer! Erm, I mean, my hero?\n\n(So how was that for a defense of our idiot king?)
486762
Yeah, it's biased.  But what do you expect from a corporation that readily hands over personal Internet subject search records of Americans over to Bush and Co. in the administration's guise of cracking down on porn?  From what I heard, they also use people to fill Yahoo Answers with questioners and answerers that push the Republican agenda.\n\nAnd it was dumb to pose that question.  It is a crime to threaten the President and even though you weren't trying to do that, it can be interpreted that way--especially by this president.  But I've noticed that they've let a lot of your other questions slide by which violates their vulgarity standards, but I guess as long as you're not offensive in a political way, then are fine with it.  I'm sure most conservatives are like that.
1127184
YES I am tired of this.  I believe most Americans are as well, which is why FOX news (Fair and Balanced) is growing in leaps & bounds.  They dont "spin" and editorialize every story.\nWhen a true thinking senator like Joe Leiberman comes back from Iraq and reports on the progress and good things, he is discounted and attacked by the media and those in his own party.  How pathetic is that??\n\nYou are SO right on with your comments!!
46474
Want really conservative views? Try Little Green Footballs. Want really liberal views? The Daily Kos might be a little dry for you. Try Metafilter.
1146951
wait a minute.  who are these "Libs so gung ho for War?"  i'm certainly no liberal, but i know, and tolerate, somewhat, a number of self-proclaimed liberals.  by the same token, i know and tolerate, somewhat, a number of conservatives (who are mostly embarrassed these days).  all these folks, which i regard as friends and associates have one thing in common.  they are against the war.  they mostly feel they've been lied to by a government they want so much to support.  now personally i knew bush was lieing when i saw his lips moving.  now of course i've been prooven correct.  that doesn't make me feel any better.  this war is a tragedy.  \n\nas for your commentary on main stream media, you describe it as "their MSM media."  i take it you see the media as liberal?  where have you been?  main stream media is anything but liberal. when was it?  sure there have been a few liberal types who had columns, perhaps a few television talking heads, but media is big business, and in so many cases is unabashed state propaganda.  you should thank your god that there are liberals in the media.
1040289
Whoa... Damn ppl, reporting?! Harming?! Naming names?! I can't believe how everyone is buying into this crap... Yes, there's a problem, but it's been here for years. Everyone's got chill out, 'cause this is starting to sound like one of those infamous Red Scares again? What's next, are we gonna accuse of them being Commies? Public persecution? Are you actually afraid, or do just people love to get on the band wagon and bash everyone that the media tells them to? Bush, Iraq, and now Immigration, oh yeah gay marriage before that? You do realize the last two are just a little thing that Bush and his cabinet uses to get the focus away from his incompetence?
128948
No but it's not hard to see just by the front page which way that newspaper leans to,where once we had reporters to keep us informed on current political events,we now have bias,arrogant,self promoted car salesmen that give us their side of view only,major newspapers nowadays with their editorials and oppinion colunms are no different than your raunchy gossip magazines found by the counter on every store,it's a shame that the partisan mentality found in Washington DC found among the politicians has now spread to the free press making them as reliable for information as The Inquirer
1047898
Don't you mean the NY Times? At least they happen to be the paper that the Bush Admin. is targeting. Although the Gov. has a web site, and a magazine dedicated to this very issue! Not to mention all the other media organizations that printed the same story... What a scam!\nBush himself has made over a dozen public statements, since 9/11, mentioning how they are disrupting "terrorist" funding!!!\nJust another disgusting Bush Admin. tactic to distort and distract!
345857
The Anti-Bush questions don't bother me so much. We live inb a pretty partisan environment and Bush is a controversial figure. You either love him or hate him it seems. The questions that astound me are all the 9/11 Conspiracy questions. There seem to be more every day when 9/11 has been a settlted matter the moment 100+ Million people watched it happen right in front of them. Now, apparently, it was all smoke and mirrors.... *rolleyes*
408880
It is NOT just you. There is a serious DUH factor in MOST of the questions in here.\n\n\nReticent how can you blame Yahoo's STUPID questions on Bush. That raises the DUH factor of the answers.
913733
Everything changes. My socio-political views are vastly different than they were before the Viet Nam war.\n\nI prefer to consume information from all points of the political compass rather than be one of the lemmings being preached to by the choir. I get info from Fox News, NBC, ABC, CBS, Christian Science Monitor, PBS...you name it, I'll read it. Then I put it through my BS filter and do my best to get a truer picture than what just one or two news outlets would present. I hate the thought of falling into line on an issue based on political bias.