enlarging or reducing?
102173
Making a map (reducing)\nLooking at something with a magnifying glass (enlarging)\nUsing a blueprint to construct a building (enlarging)
130214
There are two general approaches to scaling a drawing.\nOne is to scale as you draw it.  Figure out your scale factor, pull out a calculator, and go to town.  In a 1:20 drawing, when it says to draw a 20' wall, you draw a line 12" long.  Then print 1:1  This is not the preferered method, as it vastly increases drawing time with all those calculations.  If this is the case, you need to scale the drawing you brought in to match the scale of the native drawing.  So, if you brought in the 1:40 drawing into the 1:20 drawing, you would need to scale UP the size of the 1:40 drawing by a factor of 2.\n    The other approach to scaling is to draw EVERYTHING 1:1.  (20' wall in real life is 20' in CAD).  Then, as you said, scale when printing or scale using viewports and model/paper space.  If this is the case, there is no "incorporating".  Both drawings are 1:1 in CAD.  When you tell it to print 1:20, it will affect both drawings equally.  Both drawings will be at the scale of the native drawing on paper.  So, if you brought in a 1:1 drawing that was printed 1:40 into the 1:1 drawing that was printed 1:20, they will both be 1:20 on the paper. (how's that for confusing?)  You do not nee to scale either drawing.  However, you might need to scale up the size of text and dimension text on the 1:40 drawing so that they will be the same size on both drawings.\n   I know thiw was a long answer.  I hope I didn't confuse you more.  Good Luck.
87328
Just take one you want to use and edit it to be 50x50. Just remember if it's very big or too much is in it ... it will become so small you can't see it.
806656
*** hellow,\nsize dosn't matter ? even 3'' or less can serve your purpose.
605294
Right click on the photo, click on properties then reduce the size of it that way, just make the numbers smaller
99861
Over the counter, off the internet stuff does not work in the least. Doctors can enlarge it at most 1/2 inch which to me doesn't justify the cost nor the pain. Be happy with what you've got and just learn to use it or learn to compensate in other ways :)
653744
well... it's imposible, with the applications I have, to enlarge an image without a corresponding loss of resolution.\n\nHOWEVER... Image EXPERT, has this "FOCUS" tool, that will minimize the effects.\n\nchange the size to where you want it to be... then "SHARPEN" the image... sometimes... you can get away with it.\n\nGood luck
1157098
No, there's nothign wrong.  As you shrink an image, it will appear fuzzy as it has to remove pixels to account for the size difference. If you expand your image back to it's original state, you'll notice it won't look the same anymore, as pixels have been removed.
745110
This happened to me to. I just clicked on the minimize button(restore down) on the top right hand side and then click it again to enlarge it and it came back. Good Luck and I hope it works for you too.
899574
Lose weight. That'll make it look bigger.
544551
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT???\n\nClarify what you mean please. \n\n:{
578266
largest with all the ice\n\n2nd largest without all the ice
794645
I am having same problem..I know the simple click to enlarge but I want it to stay that way and am pretty sure that's what you mean also. Larry from Radio shack has good answer but I don't understand what he means need something simple please.
824358
if it's a small file, say less than 500x500 kb it'll look bad when enlarged, go for something a little bigger and it won't be as pixelated, maybe 1280x1024?
987691
Edit>Transform>Scale\n\n\n\n\nImage size (as mentioned below) will resize the entire picture. Transform is best for layers
482756
Well, they both take a lot of time! And, I must see the algorithm of (....;)! When both take a lot of time, We should check the one which takes the less time! If both takes the same time, we should choose the one which takes less space (Memory space I mean) But generally, Prefer the 2nd one! I think we should try to use a general code or function in the second choice! If there isn't a general rule, then, I prefer using the 1st one, cause it takes less memory and the lines of codes will be less I suppose...
559136
SOMEANTHA is correct\n\nbut if you want a quickie answer for bigger numbers\nhere is a website that will do it for you\n\nhttp://www.onlineconversion.com/length_common.htm