What is the Greek words for "Lord Jesus Christ" and "Jehovah" in NT?
98385
Jesus in greek is Lesous with was translated in Lesus in latin then Jesus in English did you know there is no J, or j sound in the Hebrew language. When the King James bible was translated in English in 1611 Jesus and Jehovah name wasn't in there because the J wasn't in use then, J is the last letter added to the latin alphabet.\n\n\nBut Jesus name is Yahshua in the orginal text it the only name that give salvation. ACT 4;12 Jesus in A English translation that means nothing, because the holy name of Yah was took out. Which God many many times condemn people for not using his real name.\n\nJehovah name is all messed up the suffix Hovah means wicked, terrible in hebrew and it's missing Yah in the name so it have on meaning ethier.
1027391
Thou shalt have no other gods before me.\nTreasury of Scripture KnowledgeConcordance and Hebrew/Greek LexiconList Audio, Study Tools, Commentaries\nNo Images or Hymns AvailableVersions / TranslationsDictionary Aids\nExd 20:4Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness [of any thing] that [is] in heaven above, or that [is] in the earth beneath, or that [is] in the water under the earth:\nTreasury of Scripture KnowledgeConcordance and Hebrew/Greek LexiconList Audio, Study Tools, Commentaries\nNo Images or Hymns AvailableVersions / TranslationsDictionary Aids\nExd 20:5Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God [am] a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth [generation] of them that hate me;\nTreasury of Scripture KnowledgeConcordance and Hebrew/Greek LexiconList Audio, Study Tools, Commentaries\nNo Images or Hymns AvailableVersions / TranslationsDictionary Aids\nExd 20:6And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.\nTreasury of Scripture KnowledgeConcordance and Hebrew/Greek LexiconList Audio, Study Tools, Commentaries\nNo Images or Hymns AvailableVersions / TranslationsDictionary Aids\nExd 20:7Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.\nTreasury of Scripture KnowledgeConcordance and Hebrew/Greek LexiconList Audio, Study Tools, Commentaries\nNo Images or Hymns AvailableVersions / TranslationsDictionary Aids\nExd 20:8Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.\nTreasury of Scripture KnowledgeConcordance and Hebrew/Greek LexiconList Audio, Study Tools, Commentaries\nNo Images or Hymns AvailableVersions / TranslationsDictionary Aids\nExd 20:9Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:\nTreasury of Scripture KnowledgeConcordance and Hebrew/Greek LexiconList Audio, Study Tools, Commentaries\nHymnsVersions / TranslationsDictionary Aids\nExd 20:10But the seventh day [is] the sabbath of the LORD thy God: [in it] thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that [is] within thy gates:\nTreasury of Scripture KnowledgeConcordance and Hebrew/Greek LexiconList Audio, Study Tools, Commentaries\nNo Images or Hymns AvailableVersions / TranslationsDictionary Aids\nExd 20:11For [in] six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them [is], and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.\nTreasury of Scripture KnowledgeConcordance and Hebrew/Greek LexiconList Audio, Study Tools, Commentaries\nNo Images or Hymns AvailableVersions / TranslationsDictionary Aids\nExd 20:12Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.\nTreasury of Scripture KnowledgeConcordance and Hebrew/Greek LexiconList Audio, Study Tools, Commentaries\nNo Images or Hymns AvailableVersions / TranslationsDictionary Aids\nExd 20:13Thou shalt not kill.\nTreasury of Scripture KnowledgeConcordance and Hebrew/Greek LexiconList Audio, Study Tools, Commentaries\nNo Images or Hymns AvailableVersions / TranslationsDictionary Aids\nExd 20:14Thou shalt not commit adultery.\nTreasury of Scripture KnowledgeConcordance and Hebrew/Greek LexiconList Audio, Study Tools, Commentaries\nNo Images or Hymns AvailableVersions / TranslationsDictionary Aids\nExd 20:15Thou shalt not steal.\nTreasury of Scripture KnowledgeConcordance and Hebrew/Greek LexiconList Audio, Study Tools, Commentaries\nNo Images or Hymns AvailableVersions / TranslationsDictionary Aids\nExd 20:16Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.\nTreasury of Scripture KnowledgeConcordance and Hebrew/Greek LexiconList Audio, Study Tools, Commentaries\nNo Images or Hymns AvailableVersions / TranslationsDictionary Aids\nExd 20:17Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not c
716636
<A-1,Verb,25,agapao> \nand the corresponding noun agape (B, No. 1 below) present "the characteristic word of Christianity, and since the Spirit of revelation has used it to express ideas previously unknown, inquiry into its use, whether in Greek literature or in the Septuagint, throws but little light upon its distinctive meaning in the NT. Cp., however, Lev. 19:18; Deut. 6:5. \n"Agape and agapao are used in the NT (a) to describe the attitude of God toward His Son, John 17:26; the human race, generally, John 3:16; Rom 5:8; and to such as believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, particularly, John 14:21; (b) to convey His will to His children concerning their attitude one toward another, John 13:34, and toward all men, 1 Thess. 3:12; 1 Cor. 16:14; 2 Pet. 1:7; (c) to express the essential nature of God, 1 John 4:8. \n\n"Love can be known only from the actions it prompts. God's love is seen in the gift of His Son, 1 John 4:9,10. But obviously this is not the love of complacency, or affection, that is, it was not drawn out by any excellency in its objects, Rom. 5:8. It was an exercise of the Divine will in deliberate choice, made without assignable cause save that which lies in the nature of God Himself, Cp. Deut. 7:7,8. \n\n"Love had its perfect expression among men in the Lord Jesus Christ, 2 Cor. 5:14; Eph. 2:4; 3:19; 5:2; Christian love is the fruit of His Spirit in the Christian, Gal. 5:22. \n\n"Christian love has God for its primary object, and expresses itself first of all in implicit obedience to His commandments, John 14:15,21,23; 15:10; 1 John 2:5; 5:3; 2 John 1:6. Self-will, that is, self-pleasing, is the negation of love to God. \n\n"Christian love, whether exercised toward the brethren, or toward men generally, is not an impulse from the feelings, it does not always run with the natural inclinations, nor does it spend itself only upon those for whom some affinity is discovered. Love seeks the welfare of all, Rom. 15:2, and works no ill to any, 13:8-10; love seeks opportunity to do good to 'all men, and especially toward them that are of the household of the faith,' Gal. 6:10. See further 1 Cor. 13 and Col. 3:12-14." * [* From Notes on Thessalonians, by Hogg and Vine, p. 105.] \n\nIn respect of agapao as used of God, it expresses the deep and constant "love" and interest of a perfect Being towards entirely unworthy objects, producing and fostering a reverential "love" in them towards the Giver, and a practical "love" towards those who are partakers of the same, and a desire to help others to seek the Giver. See BELOVED. \n\n<A-2,Verb,5368,phileo> \nis to be distinguished from agapao in this, that phileo more nearly represents "tender affection." The two words are used for the "love" of the Father for the Son, John 3:35 (No. 1); 5:20 (No. 2); for the believer, John 14:21 (No. 1); 16:27 (No. 2); both, of Christ's "love" for a certain disciple, John 13:23 (No. 1); 20:2 (No. 2). Yet the distinction between the two verbs remains, and they are never used indiscriminately in the same passage; if each is used with reference to the same objects, as just mentioned, each word retains its distinctive and essential character. \n\nPhileo is never used in a command to men to "love" God; it is, however, used as a warning in 1 Cor. 16;22; agapao is used instead, e.g., Matt. 22:37; Luke 10:27; Rom. 8:28; 1 Cor. 8:3; 1 Pet. 1:8; 1 John 4:21. The distinction between the two verbs finds a conspicuous instance in the narrative of John 21:15-17. The context itself indicates that agapao in the first two questions suggests the "love" that values and esteems (cp. Rev. 12:11). It is an unselfish "love," ready to serve. The use of phileo in Peter's answers and the Lord's third question, conveys the thought of cherishing the object above all else, of manifesting an affection characterized by con
842964
John 11:35, literally from the Greek "wept (the) Jesus"
564304
Are you sure the question is about the first five books of the NEW Testament, and not the OLD? In case it pertains to the OLD TESTAMENT, it is called the "PENTATEUCH" --the first five books which were written by Moses. [Others have answered for the NT books otherwise.]\n\nLanguages: OT--Hebrew only; NT--Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek.\n\nMajor Prophets: [Enoch, Noah,] Moses, Elijah, David, Daniel, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Yeshua [aka Jesus], John the Baptist...\n\nGood luck!
658550
well, following the rules of grammar, you would say "Jesi".\nWhich I think is pretty cool but doesn't sound quite right.\n\nI'ma have to go with Jesuses.
211244
JEHOVAH.\n(Exodus 3:15; 6:3; Psalm 83:18; Isaiah 42:8; 54:5) \n~_~
867908
Ironically, the bible.\n\nThe entire text of the bible is freely available at the official website of Jehovah's Witnesses, and a personal printed copy can be requested at no charge:\nhttp://watchtower.org/bible/\nhttps://watch002.securesites.net/contact/submit.htm\nhttp://watchtower.org/how_to_contact_us.htm\n\n\nJehovah's Witnesses are happy to study the bible with an interested person using any translation the householder may prefer, and in fact Jehovah's Witnesses themselves distribute several translations. Jehovah's Witnesses attach no particular infallibility or inspiration to any one translation.\n\nIt is sad when argumentative persons distract from the bible's clear message of Kingdom "good news".\n\n(2 Timothy 4:3-5) For there will be a period of time when they will not put up with the healthful teaching, but, in accord with their own desires, they will accumulate teachers for themselves to have their ears tickled; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, whereas they will be turned aside to false stories. You, though, keep your senses in all things, suffer evil, do the work of an evangelizer, fully accomplish your ministry.\n\nIt seems signficant that the relatively small religion of Jehovah's Witnesses are the ones best known for their worldwide preaching work. Yet Jesus commanded that ALL who would call themselves "Christian" perform this public work:\n\n(Matthew 28:19,20) Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit, teaching them to observe all the things I have commanded you. And, look! I am with you all the days until the conclusion of the system of things.\n\nLearn more:\nhttp://watchtower.org/library/pr/article_04.htm\nhttp://watchtower.org/e/na/\nhttp://watchtower.org/e/20020915/article_01.htm\nhttp://www.watchtower.org/e/20050715/article_02.htm
12850
Christ is not a last name--it is an honorary epithet meaning "the anointed one" in Greek (Christos). The New Testament was written in Greek, and the Gospel writers used this term to indicate that Jesus was the Messiah.
211045
The name above every other name is Jesus Christ.Is this what you are referring to?What do you mean "who wrote it?"
1002031
Start with Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John in the New Testament.  Then Psalms and Proverbs in the Old Testament.  That should give you a good start.
695848
Matthew 22:21 (King James Version)\n21They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.\n\nread the whole chapter of Matthew 22
358302
As commanded by the angels, Joseph named Him "Jesus." The actual term in Aramaic is "Yeshua." And the term "Christ" is actually a title that identifies Him as the "annointed one" or "messiah." The translation from English to Greek to Aramic is: Christ - Xristos - Messiach.
1015926
probably Yeshua, like joshua, the J sound was not in use among the hebrews.\n\nname would mean the salvation that I am
480639
First of all, no one speaks ancient Greek or Hebrew anymore, so there will always be some debate to translation.  \n\nSecond, the translators of the New World Translation are all Jehovah's Witnesses.  Part of the belief system of the Jehovah Witnesses (and part of what makes it a cult) is that if any non-JW tries to convince you of anything they are "from the devil, and should not be listened to."  So it isn't that they haven't told the translators about the errors, it is that the translators don't listen.  \n\nThird, the "scholars" you speak of don't have the qualifications to translate the Bible.  They use their ideology, not their intellect to make the statement that there are "no errors."\n\nFourth, if the "scholars" were doing such a great job of translating, why don't all the other scholars who study ancient Greek and Hebrew come up with at least SOME of the same conclusions, in fact why do ALL of them disagree?\n\nFifth, if the New World Translation has no errors, why can a simple Greek student like myself find errors?  If you believe the New World Translation has no errors, you have never taken Greek!\n\nSixth, Scholars who have actually done the translating on every translation (with a few exceptions where ideology got in the way, like the NWT) have worked very hard to make sure there were no translation errors, so your argument is invalid.\n\n\nBTW - Translating error - John 1:1, if it should be translated "the Word was a God" because of the lack of a definite article before the word translated God (here the word is Theos), you had better insert the word "a" before God in verses 6,12, and 18 of the same chapter to read, "There arose a man that was sent forth as a representative of a god," "...to them he gave authority to become a god's children," and, "No man has seen a god at any time," for there is no definite article in front of God in any of these verses, either.  If you don't believe me, look it up.
886071
You don't need math, just any Bible, plus an Interlinear Greek Translation of the New Testament, bought at any book store.  Now, ask any religion if the signs of the last days and the second coming of Christ are being fulfilled?  They will most all say yes, they are.\n\nThen, take the IGT and look up the scripture in the original Greek and note the spelling of the word, COMING.  Now, check any other scripture with the word PRESENCE in it.  You will note that Greek spelling of BOTH words match.  So, are all the other scriptures wrong in using the word Presence, or are the signs really the signs of Christ Second Presence?\n\nIf they are, and the signs are being fulfilled, than are today's Christians repeating the mistakes of the ancient Jews in not believing the signs meant Christ had come?  Or, is all of Christendom been lying in that we are not really in the last days?
530827
Check this link and request a Bible in your language:\n\nhttp://www.watchtower.com/