Who has rule over international water?  What would happen if someone commited murder in internatinal water?
98764
I don't think their is any law on international water. You are on your own bring lots of shotguns if you plan to go there. That is why there are pirates and things.
474831
This site has useful information.\nhttp://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/atlas/atlas_html/foreword/internationalAgreements.html
410409
impose strict penalties and international regulations
223821
If the new island is in international waters no single nation can legally lay claim to it. However, any nation can adjust the extent of their territorial waters to suit themselves. Of course this can lead to the nation having to duke it out with other countries over the ownership issue.
316996
that would be the catholics. AKA French catholics. The French ran some of the most notorious prison systems in the world in both Cambodia and Vietnam.
430040
See attached link for further details:\n\n1) responsibility of individuals for internation crimes\n2) right of each accused to a fair trial\n3) historic pronouncement that one's position as a Head of State or responsible Government official does not relieve one of criminal responsibility. \n\nNuremberg trials had wide-ranging effects on the field of internation law.  In 1950, the United Nation's International Law Commission adopted a text setting out the Principles of International Law in the Charter of the Nurnberg Tribunal and the Judgement of the Tribunal.
249091
absolutely.. if they are capable of murder, the authoraties need to know before it happens again.  It will be hard, but imagine how much worse you'd feel if they murdered several other people as well, and you had the ability to stop it.
228581
yo man, the jinx with the ICC was the US itself, dude.  The deal was up and going and the US just jumped off in the last moment.  So if you ask what's the ineffectiveness of the ICC, the main point you'll have is that it can probably not be applied against US nationals.  Another point is that it depends on States. What I mean, dude, is that it works under the principle of complementarity, for real.  That shit means states go first, they judge it first, and only if they don't judge the ICC will judge.  Another points of innefectiveness is that the ICC was designed to cover the crime of aggression, but nobody knows what that actually means, dude, because there's no internationally accepted definition.  Terrorism, also, before I forget... nobody knows what terrorism really is...  \n\nSo the effective shit about the ICC is that it brings accountability for the most serious international crimes.  So if a state doesn't judge cause it doesn't want to, or because it is so immerse in chaos and anarchy and stuff that it simply cant't judge, then we have the ICC.  Another good point is that the ICC statute has helped to answer a number of questions on the elements of certain crimes, to solidify them and make them real shit for the world of international law, if you know what I'm sayin.
284851
Thats what happens when someone in another country trys to kill americans.
342249
nah, hes done worse. Im sure if the international community wasnt scared of the states, he could be brought up for war crimes. technically invading a county is against the law in international court.
424371
how to protect countries around the world from lying, cheating, murdering bass terds like us
1047604
Would have to check the Geneva Convention. Alot of countries have not signed it therefore don't follow it. I believe if they behead you then we behead them.EYE 4 AN EYE
869222
Such things fall under the jurisdiction of the home country of the host site, and not all countries are quite so keen on trying to bust pedophiles (though this is starting to change). Interpol can get involved, but their resources are stretched rather thin with other criminal activities.
676430
my guess would be the United States Government (USG)\n\nevery person or entity is responsable for it's own actions, whether they be good or bad.
1061058
yes , you can do whatever you want in international waters , we used to go deep sea fishing and be able to drink when i was very young . not sure the exact mileage but it took about an hour to get that far
741511
Brazil has an extradition treaty for sure. Ronny Biggs only escaped the UK justice system for so long because he fathered a child to a Brazilian national. Most rogue governments and dictatorships have no extradition treaty with the UK  due to the simple fact that an exile is good PR material (oops, that's another good answer banned).
698308
America should acknowledge international law, which says these waters are Canadian. Hopefully it will be resolved amicably, but beware - America was sent packing when it attacked British North America (as it then was) in 1812 and 1819.