If everyone wants rid of the Bush administration, are you communicating with your congressional Representative
106383
I tried to contact Congressman Tom DeLay but that told me he could only take one phone call a day where he is going!
1066904
Contact your local congressperson.
744901
Did you actually listen to what she had to say?  Is that what you want the Democrats to do?  Spend their time tying up the Congress with impeachment proceedings?  She's right, it's a waste of time.  There are only two years left in Bush's Administration and she's right that they would love nothing more than for the Democrats to prove they are what the Republicans have been saying all along.  Thirsting for revenge and hatred of Bush is the Dems only platform - that's what the Republicans were saying before the mid-terms.  Now you want that to be true?  Not me.  I want the war, our economy, and terrorism addressed on a bipartisan level.   There are going to be investigations into the constitutionality of many of Bush's actions, that's a given.  I hold no love for George Bush, but those thirsting for impeachment/revenge will have to find water elsewhere and I couldn't agree more.
90260
Get all of the filthy liberals out of office.
632439
Looking to sponge off the govt, eh??
1085093
unfortunately, yes.  as the commander in chief of the armed forces, the president can send them in to any place he wants, and technically they are supposed to follow his orders.  in the event that he doesnt leave office, impeachment obviously wouldnt work, and the only way to get rid of him would be to kill him, as Thomas Jefferson alluded to when he said that the people had the right and responsibility to overthrow a government that is corrupt and reestablish the old system.\n\nnow, to your question.  in debate on the house floor a few years ago (right before the invasion of iraq), representative mcdermott quoted an article from the Sydney Morning Herald titled, "Foundations are in Place for Martial Law in the United States."  Bascially, during the Iran-Contra Affair, Ronald Reagan issued an executive order giving FEMA even broader powers than Congress gave it, and among these powers were the ability to prevent violent and widespread internal dissent or national opposition against a US military invasion abroad through the use of the military, basically, declaring martial law.  all of reagans papers, including this order, were sealed by the bush administration.  therefore, we do not know the full story.  \n\ni hope that this answers your question.  ive got the whole speech, and id be happy to give it to you if you want it.
918510
if you don't want to accept any of the information provided to you, why not just go with what the American people want?  you know, the old government of the people, by the people , and for the people.  click on the link to see what the people want.\n\nhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904/\n*****\nhttp://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/21945/\n\n"Downing Street Memo"\n"United States Constitution"\n\nhttp://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/20/conservative-scholars-argue-bush%E2%80%99s-wiretapping-is-an-impeachable-offense/\n\nThe point here is not that Bush should be kicked out of office, the point I am trying to make is that there is enough information that would warrant an investigation in which Bush be sworn in and facts be discussed.  If he is so innocent, why are all Republicans so afraid of the process????\n\n**************************************\nHere's one for you Cappy:  I believe in God.  You can't prove or disprove that.  Yet I don't imagine you would make such a big deal of that.\n\n\nhttp://www.cato.org/pubs/wtpapers/powersurge_healy_lynch.pdf
1098856
Getting George Bush out of office would be a start!
278898
It's quite possible.  The same way that representatives bring up all these great plans right at the end of the term, come home for the summer while Congress is out of session, campaign and then return to "finish the job."  Then, right after the elections, a lot of the bills that the same reps were proposing and talking about die in committees, because they never really cared about them other than to talk about.
264606
It will happen near the mid term elections in November. \nThe Bush administration can not afford to lose the House of Representatives. Let's see if this ploy works.
438377
THEY NEED TO GET HIS A** OUT OF OFFICE
909431
ABSOLUTELY! I totally agree. And now is the time that I think enough Republicans would turn away from Bush. Unfortunately, not a lot of people believe that THIS election could also change the tide and get some new policies in place. It's ALMOST as good as changing the president if we can change the House and Senate. EVERYONE needs to get out and vote next week. Vote for who you think is best, but consider your Democrat since that will help balance this lopsided power in D.C.!!!
892386
I believe it will serve as a signal that people are tired of the current administration and its policies; especially on the War in Iraq. Those who support Bush's policies may want to be prepared to lose their seat.
503216
No. The congress is full of self-serving re-election whores. Presidents are a hit-or-miss proposition, and even they can't do anything without compromising on principle with the Congress.\n\nFor example, Social Security is a disaster waiting to happen, but because it is solvent now, no Congressman will touch it, lest they lose the next election because of upset voters. So they kick the problem down the road. They will only do the right thing if it aligns with their polls.\n\nSame with agricultural welfare. Same with the Cuba embargo. Etc.\n\nThey also curtail our rights, like eliminating our political voices by the Campaign Finance reform.\n\nThey also illegally spend the public monies. The Constitution is very specific on the limits of what the government can and cannot do. Charitably taking money from my pocket to give to another (and get their vote) is clearly unauthorized and illegal in any but the most distorted interpretation of the Constitution, but there it is.\n\nSo, no, I do not trust my government.
268126
eliminate the bush administration
545204
I think so. Some of them will be on the negotiating committee with the House over the final Bill.  You can let them know which parts it's 'OK to drop' in negotiations.\n\nYou should also let them know your memory is longer than 2 years.  They are counting on this 'dying down' by 2008, or their personal term limits.\n\nI hope your frustration won't keep you from contacting your Congressmen particularly in the House.  The House has the opportunity to not even let the Bill get to conference and that is exactly what they did last year with a similar House Bill the Senate Bill is based on.\n\nIf they do negotiate it, they have the ability to refuse to let it out of conference if it isn't decent.\n\nHowever, right now the Speaker of the House is saying he doesn't even see it coming out of conference. All he has to do is REFRAIN from appointing committee members.
47073
the beaurocrats in washington are scared because it would simplify the tax system to an extreme that would eliminate 75% of the irs and numerous federal employees.  to stand up in congress and announce the elimination of such a large federal program and the termination of so many jobs would be career suicide for any who propose or support such an ammendment.  for further information on the details of such a tax read the source below.