Why do we still have the wrong president?  After two fraudulent elections..  Are we that helpless?
115444
Because he had the majority of the electoral votes. That is the way it has been done since the US Constitution was ratified. If you have evidence that it was fraudulent, talk to your congressman. That would be grounds for impeachment if it is true. But if it were true, he would have been impeached 5 years ago.\n\nIf you want to change the way the President is elected, you need to do it at the state level. States decide this, not the federal government.
634810
thats a tough one. i still dont see how he was re-elected. maybe they are both equally stupid. bush is a dumbass and his followers just dont ever learn, so they are at least as stupid.
494388
no, but I think the candidates are rigged, how else could we every year get such horrible choices were you have to pick the lesser of two evils who are even freekin related to each other.
417262
I was asking the same question near the end of Bush Sr's term... things are worse now, than they were then, but I have faith that a good leader can turn things around....\nthere could be problems if a good leader isn't elected...
531787
Bush is concerned about the American people...in terms of what they think of him. Of course, since he has no chance in hell of re-election (amendment limiting the number of terms a president can serve to two), he might as well get real and stop trying to bs us with his sucky speeches and vague promises. Pretty much, I think he is trying to finish out this term without getting assassinated - that seems to be his goal. Also, he must perform well because all the eyes of the world are on him.
658798
He is the prime minister, not president.\n\nBecause election fraud seems to be common in the Western world.
120538
When the so called "leader of the free world" has been caught in so many lies that it is not even funny and more than half of the country is in denial, why would we expect to be any different.\n\nP.S. If u want to compare to previous Presidents, Pick Nixon not Clinton. Bush's lies like Nixon's are for political gain ( to get ahead). Clinton's, while just as morally repugnant, were about a PERSONAL indiscretion.
1019942
No, because he is an evil, selfish, money mongering blow hard, bastard, jackass, dick-head, son-of-a-b*tch MoFo from hell. Why did he get elected, well, crap, why did he elected twice!?!?!?! Are people in America stupid? I am American, I am not stupid. this is so annoying.
921844
Is it solveable well it better be and this past election demonstrated how.  Show ALL politicians your screw up your gone and so is your power.  \n\nBut, come on take your blinders off reality is ALL politicians are easily manipulated by the system of special interest groups.\n\nLet's hope that was it was for our country's sake.
550797
#1 This is as high as he deserves! I'ts not just him. It's the rest of his "buddie's" to. It took more than one man to get the U.S.A. in this shamful state. All of them let there mouth overload there butt's. The next presidental election is going to be "one for the book's". Make sure you VOTE,this time!!
573649
Nowadays you can't even claim Democrat/Republican they are all so corrupt. It is so disheartening. What we need to do is really check our candidates out and look deep into the heart of a man before we cast our votes. I was a Democrat, but after Clinton, I wait and claim near the end and so far it hasn't been either of those tickets. LOL
1150225
Yes!There were so many lies spread about him from the right.Saying he was going to take away our right to keep and bare arms, and it was another g.o.p. lie.Right now we're 8 trillion in debt and climbing.We had 400 billion when bush came into power.Freedom is a diminishing word,our name is compared to iran with other countries of the world.This country is going down the tubes in 6 years time.This Nov. we need to have the voting done ON PAPER SO THERE IS A TRAIL!Canada,France,Germany and other countries do it and there is no problem with people STEALING ELECTIONS!!We have the united nations supervise elections in other countries why don't we have them supervise ours?
497805
omg, i never thought about that LOL.  what if the United States held an election and no one showed up?  I bet the electorial college would still elect someone even if we didn't actually vote for that person.  Wait, that happened already with Bush lol.  guess that answers that.
676710
Yes, unfortunatlly I have been aware of this. Also: Carnivore, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnivore_(FBI)\n\nIt's going to get less easy to dig ourselves, (ie: the world ), out of this mess the longer there is not an overwhelming majority of humanity that does not accept being spyed on and treated like developmentally unevolved children. A good example of this in the the US is the fact that there is still not enough concern about individuals votes not having a direct effect on the presidential election. No, I don't mean who did or didn't win the last one, I mean the fact that the Electoral College was created because the majority of voters were deemed to be too uninformed and and lacking education to make a meaninfull decision in a national election. Apparently that is still the case. Those who support the E.C. can talk about how the process is set up, but the fact is, an individual vote carrys no legal weight in electing the Commander in Chief. Until something this obvious is noticed by the public-at-large, there is not too much hope for an issue clouded by the events that include the second week in September 2001.\n\nPray for the eyes of the world to have clear vision.
1060176
I hope the question "R most Americans really so so DUMB" was a rhetorical one. If you really want an answer, look at who we voted in as President.... TWICE! There is your answer my friend. I only wish I could say otherwise.
374310
The US are regularly doing this. The elect a President who is a right numbskull and exepct the rest of the world to believe that he is the person they really think can rule the US and the rest of the world. Now that is really taking the urine (they even had a Senator called Goldwater!!!!)
328593
I think all those who voted for him the second time, and not the first time should realize the grave error of their choice. He has failed a majority of Americans both domestically and internationally. This is not Bush bashing at all. He had the whole country behind him after 9-11. He could have possibly been the great es president in the modern history of the United States but his evangelical policies have not only hurt his reputation but America's image. \nI would like to think that he is a good fella in person, but America and the world does not operate according to "cowboy" politics. \nI hope those who blindly voted for this administration recognize one thing. People are dying in Iraq, both Americans and Iraqis for a war that was initiated for weapons of mass destruction. The world knew there was no WMD in Iraq, maybe elsewhere, but not Iraq. This is a scar in World History and will be written in history books. The future generations to come will tell us one day: "This looked like Vietnam all over again"\n\nGod Bless America!