the advantages and disadvantages of scientific innovation with famous quotes?
117948
Do your own homework. Or rephrase your question.
297180
The pros are being able to learn about the effects of different genetic patterning.  Perhaps solving some questions of nature vs. nurture.\n\nThe cons very from reducing genetic variety, which can lead to weakness of the cloned species because a certain stressor could knock out the whole bunch if they are genetically the same.  Every time something is copied usually something is lost.  Also cloned species can have unknown effect on other species. For example, some form of genetically engineered corn which is resistant to pests also kills off monarch butterflies that consume a portion of the plant.
452512
I have seen a number of these pro and con.   The con ones are full of really bad science which sound good if you don't know the science (i.e. shadows etc).\n\nIt happened get used to it folks are just trying to get another multi-million dollar conspiracy industry going :-)
676912
Here's a web-site of "cool sayings":\n\nhttp://www.cool-saying.com/
180411
Whether the source is well-knows as being reliable. Whether the source is biased to say something specific (companies can never be trusted with scientific data). And, whether the data appears to hold up to theory.\n\nAs a nanotech student I use a lot of information found on the internet, but most if it is more practical information (how to conduct specific experiments) than theoretical (can be found in books). Consequently, it is easy to see whether the information is useful or just bogus.
905156
Advantage and disadvantage:\n\nPlants with high photosynthesis rates grows faster but has a shorter term of life.
1175626
Advantage\n\n1 connected to the world\n2 e-mail communication\n3 More control than television\n4 develops understanding of logical patterns\n5 could create own web site for the world to see\n6 multi-entertainment, music, video, stories\n7 full text of breaking news stories\n8 technology always improving\n9 hard drive prices have went down\n10 practice your typing\n\nDisadvantages\n\n1 could waste needless time surfing \n2 news stories biased\n3 too many sites listed in search engine\n4 some information not credible\n5  high speed connection cosly\n6 hard drive could be three generations old in one year\n7 not enough innovative thinking by computer corportations\n8 too many bugs in certain browsers\n9 too many high school students plagerize\n10 makes researching too easy and tough research is avoided
1171206
Here's a website with a few... http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~cheshire/EinsteinQuotes.html
1004024
http://inventors.about.com/od/famousinventions/\nhttp://inventors.about.com/library/bl/bl12.htm\nPlease click the above link to find what u r looking for.
1160137
Ben Franklin has a lot of famous and GOOD quotes etc. research some online.
1176470
With free energy:\n\nYou could put water back in the deserts of Africa and they wouldn't have to worry about food.\nPeople wouldn't need to burn wood to stay warm.\nA space rocket could go anywhere, fuel is main thing limiting us from travel.\n\nThe reward beside a lot of money, would be eternal fame. You would be more remembered that other famous scientists because you would have to discover some property they didn't know which proved them wrong.
1105136
Insatable curiosity\n\nAbility to focus long term on a problem and persevere until it is solved.\n\nDisreguard for convention and rules. Few scientists of note did not have to buck the establishment to pursue the discoveries which made them famous. Many in fact were never believed in thier own lifetimes. \n\nAbility to logically diseminate between cause, action and fiction. That is the ability to analyze a phenomonon, seperate the phenonomon from the surrounding hype, hysteria, myth and scientific dogma. Then to break the phenonomon into understandable pieces. \n\nI'll disagree with one of the previous answers. Comunication skills is notably lacking in many scientists. Some very famous scientists were very notably anti-social or socially disfunctional. Often they were difficult to understand and more than a few had little patience with others. Eventually yes somebody else had to make heads or tails of what you were saying and disseminate it to others. Rarely is that the actual scientist.
404003
http://inventors.about.com/od/patentoffices/a/US_Patent_Offic.htm\n\nhttp://www.inventnet.com/page1.html\n\nhttp://books.google.com/books?q=every+invention+patented+in+the+US&oi=print&sa=X&oi=print&ct=title\n\nhttp://news.google.com/news?q=every+invention+in+the+US&hl=en&lr=&sa=X&oi=news&ct=title\n\nhttp://www.colitz.com/site/wacky.htm\n\nhttp://www.einsteinyear.org/facts/physicsFacts\n\nhttp://www.transfer.ethz.ch/patente/patente_/index_EN
119781
You could make a discussion both ways. It needs creativity, but it is also a science. You need to adapt and inspire (creativity), while working methodically and logically to increase productivity (science)
496409
I would suggest a trip to the library. Look for books on inventors. Also, meet the person sitting behind the desk that says, "reference". You are why they live.
690650
Some of Einstein's Ideas are already being rewritten. So, quoting him as an end-all to the question of anti-gravity really doesn't mean a whole lot. Newton's laws were rewritten after his time, as science learned more about itself. It's not unreasonable to assume that the same will occur in reguards to this taboo topic too. I remember seeing a video of a man who has come close, with a spinning top device. By itself, it weighs far too much to lift by hand. But, once it is set spinning, it could be lifted by a child. :)\n\nCurrent science is not an absolute. :) Don't give up hope!
141858
There are benefits and drawbacks to everything, including science. Here are a few drawbacks:\n\n1. Science has lead to the creation of far more powerful and dangerous weapons than ever existed before, so one person can kill millions, potentially. \n\n2. Science has given us the means to pollute the earth and destroy other species at a rate that is unparalleled.\n\n3. Science has lead to technologies that can be used to repress populations, and infringe on people's privacy\n\n4. Science has produced technologies that inadvertantly created a horrendous population explosion\n\n5. Science is viewed as a threat by some who think it draws people away from religion. \n\nThere are probably a lot more of these that I could come up with.