Did Hitler really die in his bunker or was it a clone that took his place?
111753
I don't really know if anybody can positively say for certain that he died in the bunker, he could have lived out his life in south america, that has always been rumored.
828914
it was hidden, or not true, or he didnt die
341288
Hitler tried to invade Russia.\n\nDo you know why he failed?\n\nCause back then, they didn't have anti-freeze, and the tanks FROZE.\n\nPoor sorry sacks had to walk it back to Germany.\n\nLoL!
351723
There is something you have to consider, Hitler committed suicide\n\nSuicides—A Resurrection?\n\nTHE tragic news of a suicide does not close a chapter in the lives of relatives and friends; it opens one—a chapter of mixed feelings of pity and anger, sorrow and guilt. And it raises the question: May we entertain any hope for our friend who took his or her life?\n\nAlthough self-inflicted death is never justified, never righteous, the apostle Paul did hold out a beautiful hope for even some unrighteous ones. As he told a Roman court of law: “I have hope toward God . . . that there is going to be a resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous.”—Acts 24:15. \nMany theologians have long dismissed any suggestion that the resurrection of the unrighteous might offer hope for those who commit suicide. Why?\n\nCenturies ago, churchmen introduced a non-Biblical concept: immortal souls that leave the body at death and go straight to heaven, purgatory, Limbo, or hell. That concept clashed with the Bible’s clear teaching of a future resurrection. As Baptist minister Charles Andrews asked: “If the soul is already blissfully in heaven (or is already justifiably roasting in hell), what need is there for anything further?” He added: “This inner contradiction has remained to plague Christians throughout the centuries.”\n\nOne result of such errant theology was that “since Augustine’s time [354-430 C.E.], the church has condemned suicide as a sin,” says Arthur Droge in the Bible Review, “a sin beyond redemption, just like apostasy and adultery.”\n\nJesus told a criminal sentenced to death: “You will be with me in Paradise.” The man was unrighteous—a lawbreaker rather than a distraught suicide victim—guilty by his own frank admission. (Luke 23:39-43) He had no hope of going to heaven to rule with Jesus. So the Paradise in which this thief could hope to come back to life would be the beautiful earth under the rule of Jehovah God’s Kingdom.—Matthew 6:9, 10; Revelation 21:1-4.\n\nFor what purpose will God awaken this criminal? So that He mercilessly can hold his past sins against him? Hardly, for Romans 6:7, 23 says: “He who has died has been acquitted from his sin,” and “the wages sin pays is death.” Although his past sins will not be accounted to him, he will still need the ransom to lift him to perfection.\n\nOnly God can fully understand the role of mental sickness, extreme stress, even genetic defects, in a “suicidal crisis,” which, the National Observer noted, “is not a lifetime characteristic [but] often a matter only of minutes or of hours.”\nGranted, one who takes his own life deprives himself of the opportunity to repent of his self-murder. But who can say whether one driven to suicide might have had a change of heart had his fatal attempt failed? Some notorious murderers have, in fact, changed and earned God’s forgiveness during their lifetime.\nThus, Jehovah, having paid “a ransom in exchange for many,” His Son, is within his right to extend mercy, even to some self-murderers, by resurrecting them and giving them the precious opportunity to “repent and turn to God by doing works that befit repentance.”\n\nThe Scriptures encourage us to see ourselves, not as immortal souls, but as valuable creations of the God who loves us, who treasures our being alive, and who looks forward with joy to the time of the resurrection.\n\n4000 years had passed from Adam & Eve, Jesus said to a Religious Leader that no one had gone to Heaven, and millions of people had passed away in death. This is a quote from the King James Bible: \n\nJohn 3:13 " And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven," \nit seems to me, this would eliminate the "immortal soul" belief, not only that, if you go to Heaven or Hell when you die, you completely do away with the resurrection that the Bible speaks about, because the resurrection is suppose to take plac
1092679
There were thousands of good decent jews rounded up, put on trains, sent to concentration camps and killed cruelly, heinously!  Nevermind how many. Nevermind those who conveniently "forget".  Hitler  was a dictator who ran Germany.  He was an insane man with senseless prejudices that blue eyed blonds are superior to brunettes and that jews should be annihilated.  Whole families were called to come...they knew not for what.  There were constant calls for certain people. When their names were called they were ordered into one of the buildings, told to disrobe and get into the showers.   If they were lucky, water came through the shower over their head. People who escaped the worst reported that men who ran the showers would play with freezing and boiling water, on people, but this was relatively kind.  When they weren't playing with the water, they had the gas jets on and people were killed.  Trenches were dug. Hundreds of bodies in a spot were thrown in on top of others.  Meanwhile loving family members were separated with no control over it at all.  And their only "crime" might be that they were jewish.  And the dictator, Hitler, in his insanity considered killing jews his right.\nI was an American in my teens living on the east coast, and I met a woman in her 20s with an accent I was unused to. She told me about being in the showers, and about the night she would have been killed in them with gas only she and her boyfriend had a chance to escape on bicycles and they did and they succeeded, and they  came to the United States and got married.  What I know, I "experienced" through her first hand description. But she was rare. Countless thousands of them never had a chance. She was jewish. Since then I have met many people,  a lot of them Germans who emmigrated to this country who insisted  Hitler wasn't so bad, and this mass slaughter did not happen. They were people who never would have been threatened with the ovens,  they were citizens of Germany and whatever they wanted me to believe they felt strongly about it.  It made Germany's fearless leader look bad,  Since then I have seen moving pictures on tv, taken from life --giant piles and thousands of these nude bodies in heaps  thrown from trucks down big slant shoots, and not acted by actors,  this was real. I have seen this repeatedly.  Even while watching this horror I have heard  Americans decide to accept the (fiction) viewpoint and insist everyone around them believe it. People can believe what they want. I value the truth, pretty or ugly.\nPeople like to fictionalize history a great deal, on many sujbjects. \nThey not only fictionalize the truth but they cite a contrived fiction of yesteryear and get multimillions to believe it for political reasons, for $$$ reasons, and aftter a time for majority reasons. And  then if you have a mind of your own appreciate it but keep your own council, unless asked for the truth.\n  That shameful example of Man's inhumanity to man is  in this case, the truth.  Don't let it be swept under a rug and don't let it happen  AGAIN\nagain.
668991
Yes... and no.\n\n"Most of Adolf Hitler's biographers assert that he was a vegetarian from 1931 until his death in 1945. However, a few reports indicate that he occasionally ate meat during the 1930s." - care of the link below.\n\nHope this helps!
218238
Well, did it really happen? Its unacceptable because it lends credence to the billion dollar holocaust industry. Frnakly most of the hjolocaust garbage has been proven false. Lechter did it when he performed the first foensic test on the so-called gas chmbars and found no evidence of Zyklon B which has a residue life of 300 years as non evident in the so-called chambers.\n\nForensic evidence is good enough to execute people in America for alleged crimes but it becouse junk science when used to debunk the holocaust myths. Lechter was not the only one to perform forensic scinec on the so -called gas chambers . read the links below and find the real truth for the cover up of the billion dollar holocaust industry.\n\nFact is history has proven it never happened. Laws in certain contries make it a crime punishable by up to 3 years in jail for holocaust denile. Ifthe holocaust is so evident then why are there laws protecting any questioning of it? IT is a crime in some of these countries to even defend ones self from holocaust denile and a lawyer can be charged also if he submits any evidence to debunk the holocaust. IT a win win situation for the Jews in charge of this phony court in certain countries. It s insane and has the mind of a delusional mentally defunct government under the control of mentally ill government.\n\nShinlers list is listed in the Library of Congress as "fictional" yet the Jewish media in America tout it as truth. Anne Frank only wrote about a chapter and a hlif of her diary and the rest was peened by several (6-10) other unknown peoples. This would most certainly make one believe the diary is a fake and at most a fable or myth perpetrated by unknown people to support a holocaust.\n\nToture is never acceptable that is why most of it is amyth and is documented as such. That is why it never happened and most of what we hear about the so-called holocaust is pure propaganda.\n\nRead the links below and begin to learn to question the greatest hoax in all of history. Why is it a hoax? Because if it were discoverd as such it would destroy the billion dollar industry that most of its perpetrators of mis-truth rely upon for their own survival. \n\nHowever, and intelligent human would be able to decide for themselves so it is imparative to learn both sides and form ons own opinion. Read the links below and learn how history is distorted and changed to bennifit a few.
62740
I'm pretty sure he wasn't, he was a killer of replicants (a blade runner).\n\nOK, I'm changing my answer to:  no one knows.  Apparantly this is an ongoing debate among Blade Runner afficionados.  See the link below for more info.
1143930
There would be timeline repercussions.  World War 2 might never have happened, and the world would be a drastically different place.  It might be worse, or it might be better, there could have been some other crazy guy that just didn't get in before Hitler.  \n\nYes, I probably would kill him, but what if there was someone even worse out there just waiting for a chance?
651127
British intelligence commissioned historian\nHugh Trevor Roper to look into this in 1945,\npublished in book form a year or two later:\nfinding that he shot himself, his body was burned in the\nbunker garden and buried, but later recovered in part\nby Russian troops.  Later biographers (up to Ian\nKershaw recently) do not disagree in any important\ndetail.  There were 20 years ago various rumours\nof a jawbone, tooth, etc. etc. preserved in the\nKremlin, in which no one has shown much interest\nlately.
676940
Oswald could not have been the only one that shot Kennedy. Police recovered a 1940's model Manlicher Carcano bolt action rifle from the sixth floor of the TSBD building. In theory, this was the rifle Oswald was purported to have used. In reality, the weapon was barely capable of accuracy at 5o yards, let alone having 3 accurate shots fired from it in less than six seconds. The head shot Kennedy received caused his head to move backwards and to his left. The whole back of his skull was blown out. Close study of the Zapruder film shows this in graphic detail. As for 9/11...........well, Hitler burned the Reichstag in order to implement his plan. Nothing is impossible for desperate leaders
434212
hitler commited suicide/killed himself
385950
Well let's see.  The best evidence was tainted.  The crime scene (Presidential Limousine) was cleaned and repaired before it was processed for evidence.  The body of the President was a mess.  Now who had possession of both? The Secret Service maybe.  Did Oswald control the Secret Service? I hope not.  Who did control the Secret Service?  You tell me.\n\nI do have some serious doubts.  Oswald's military records indicate he was an average marksman.  The weapon he "used" was an antique with a reputation for inaccuracy and malfunction.  The military considers me an expert with rifle and handgun.  I have taught a few people to use both effectively.  Additionally I have seen film of what Oswald would have seen from that window.  I doubt seriously that I could have made the shots he did, in the time he had, with a good bolt action rifle, now with an M14, no problem.\n\nIf you are really interested, the best book I have ever read on the subject is BEST EVIDENCE.  I'm sorry but I don't have the author's name at the moment.  It is a good read but you have to be serious about the subject.  It is quite long and incorporates a great deal of medical information.\n\nEverything I have written here is fact as I know and understand it.  But even if I am completely wrong, it does make for interesting conversation.
933346
On April 29, 1945, he married his mistress Eva Braun.  The following day Hitler committed suicide, shooting himself through the mouth with a pistol. His body was carried into the garden of the Reich Chancellery by aides, covered with petrol and burned along with that of Eva Braun.This final, macabre act of self-destruction appropriately symbolized the career of a political leader whose main legacy to Europe was the ruin of its civilization and the senseless sacrifice of human life for the sake of power and his own commitment to the bestial nonsense of National Socialist race mythology. With his death nothing was left of the "Greater Germanic Reich," of the tyrannical power structure and ideological system which had devastated Europe during the twelve years of his totalitarian rule.
4748
The generally accepted cause of Adolf Hitler's death on April 30, 1945 is suicide by gunshot and cyanide poisoning. The dual method and other circumstances surrounding the event encouraged rumors that Adolf Hitler may have survived the end of World War II along with speculation about what happened to his remains; however, consensus on most of the details was eventually reached among historians, aided by the 1993 opening of records kept by the Russian KGB and FSB.
518779
you know if you think of it in another way.. hitler is actually someone to look up to... well forget about the killing.... he was a very well opimistic person which a lot of us could use nowadays.... well they hate him because after the war he created the world became poorer... a lot of earth treaures gone missing, resources lesser than usual.... and hey    a lot more diseases are popping out because of the war he caused
69919
This is an exam-like quesion. Anyway, I believe that Hitler was overinflated and he bursted.