Why is the Us military not attacking Al-Quadia? Cause he said that he has more dangerous weapons?
111980
the reaosn why the havent attacking AL_Quadua becuse they cant go on too the deep mountion with out getting bomd or; short ny a sinper in the hill. thses so call people in irqa are not people they are evil ' they have no sole they dont belvie in god ; the hate are way of life ; becuse they have no life in irqa. they have no rigth; they jsut know how to hurt people' to me that a sin too kill for kn resaon; them gain that thier way of life they need to keep thier self in thier own cou=nt  we dont need then in usa ;  idont that for sure; god know him slf. so who read this take any u wamt i dont care this is my home land i live in usa i was bron in USA::::} god give me that right. and dad and his brothers fright for my freedom,  that u.
374531
Because liberals, in general, lack a basic understanding of the what military does and what is accomplishes. And any Commander in Chief who places his utmost trust in the military must be inherently bad.\n\nThe modern-day liberal's distrust of the military dates back to Vietnam and Watergate. The lesson they have drawn from those experiences is that the government cannot be trusted in any way with anything. Unless, of course, it is THEIR government.\n\nKhalid Sheikh Mohamed (that ugly, hairy guy that was arrested in Pakistan a year or so back) was the architect of 9/11. He has stated during interrogation that al Qaida had planned more attacks for 2001 and early 2002. the ONLY thing that stop them was President Bush's response. They had expected only a couple of cruise missiles sent to terrorist training camps - as was the usual response throughout the 1990s.\n\nConsider the following:\n\n* 1993 - al Qaida bombs the World Trade Center for the first time.\n* 1995 - al Qaida bombs Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia.\n* 1998 - al Qaida bombs two US embassies in Africa.\n* 2000 - al Qaida bombs the USS Cole.\n* 2001 - al Qaida destroys the World Trade Center complex killing 3000.\n\nAl Qaida declared war on American in 1993, and nothing was done. Every couple of years al Qaida attacked us again, and nothing was done.\n\nNothing was done, that is, until President Bush had a chance to respond. And there has not been an attack since.
1160513
When you consider what he did to Nicolaus Berg, it would have been nice if an American soldier in uniform would have held up to Zarqawi's neck a rusty machete.  Not that the soldier should have used it, but rather scare him and remind him of the beast he was and the atrocities he committed.  Sending him into cardiac arrest in this manner would be fitting.
1120228
Well, you heard the responses from the brave Americans who sit in their homes and have prejudged you to be an Al Quida member, many of these guys must have avoided the draft or military services and are now speaking brave words-they are not a conquered nation, they are the conquering hero's (villains actually, where are the WMD's) and will speak with reflected glory.\n\nIt is indeed brave to kill an enemy who is probably a baby or a woman nursing a baby form far off by carpet bombing. Well the woman was nursing wasn't she, feeding a potential enemy of the US of A?\n\nChildren, and spoiled children thats most of the above answerer's are, Shame on you and your country! War is wrong, of any sort, and especially for fabricated reasons - you can't control the oil in any other way, the US can't, so it turns global bully!\n\nI am not an Iraqi or a Muslim. I admire the USA, but for their acts  on Iraq, there is nothing but contempt!\nst
97824
Hell yeah.  I would have shot him in a heartbeat.  Ok...that wasn't the "politically correct" answer to give, but after being there, my bro-in-law is currently in Fallujah, and my hubby leaving in 2 weeks for his 2nd tour....I know how the insurgents will very easliy destroy themselves...ESPECIALLY if it means taking out 1 or more of our great soldiers.  I would much rather have one more dead insurgent(not IRAQI) than suffer more casualties of our troops.
1172846
GOOOOOOD JOOOOOOB MAN,\ni'm very happy with ur logic,and most of the ppl who answered till now couldnt defeat ur logic,they r all just repeating words they heared in their zionist controlled media like pirots,they even cant convince themself,so they sounded funny.\nWhy do americans think they r better than others ,and they have the right to tell others do this & dont do that,\nEven if Iran want to have nuclear weapons,so what?\namerica and israel & others have tons of them,america used it before cause japan attaked PH with REGULAR WEAPONS so u went and droped 2 NUCLEAR bombs over them kiling and effecting millions of ppl till today (why the second bomb???isnt one enough),and used depleded uranium in the war with Iraq,and threatened too many countries including Iran,\n\nIf the Iranian president talked about whiping israel,also america already whiped Iraq&Afghanistan and occupied them .\n\namerican gov is a TERRORIST gov,and the us president is a radical person and he said before that this is a crusaid war,so he is a terrorist and not stable also.\n\namerica is detaining innocent ppl (&kids)in illegal jails with no trial,which is the same brutal acts of the third world countries which america is using as an excuse to attack & invade them \n\nThe core of the american military power is the nuclear arsenal,and without it ,america cant win a war even if they didnt use it,the threat of having it&the ability to use it while the other part dont ,is enough for america to win,and thats why america dont want anybody to have these weapons.\nSo please guys,i know there is a lot of nic americans,and maybe the majority r,,but they dont care about whats happening in the world they just listen to what the gov want them to beleive & beleive without thinking,and also the phobia of 911,made them beleive that any body who dont agree with there cruel foreign policy is a TERRORIST,and thats not true:)
584114
At it again are you? I'm not saying that the reasons we are there are right or wrong or any war for that matter but I do realize that someone, somewhere, must try to stop dictators and third rate nations that try to become first rate to fast. When talking fails and turning the other cheek doesn't work... all that is left is war, no matter what scale. So... it takes a lot of dedicated young people to try and straighten things out with weapons and I know of nothing more dangerous in the military's arsenal than a pissed off nineteen(+) year old with a weapon. The sad thing is... someone has to lose. Be it us or them is yet to be determined. One of life's facts is that everybody has to pay. To what cost? I don't know but I've seen enough to know that this is sometimes the only way to deal with zealots and fanatics. Oh, I have my own thoughts(and ways) of dealing with terroists but then the American people would be really taken aback! I'm amazed that most people can't comprehend war or what happens in war. I guess that's why our military does its utmost best to keep it away from our shores. By the way, I've eaten crow(Roasted) Once I got past the worms and maggots and almost cooked it black it's not to bad. I won't recommend it though. Only if you're extremely hungry.I've also talked crow (called them in). That's how I got to eat one. Having a weapon would have made it a lot easier.
980112
Nine huge transport planes ferried American troops to al-Habbaniyah airbase from the Tuesday night strike on the US Falcon arsenal. This indicated heavy American losses, but the US claimed “no casualties,” and there has not been a huge transport of bodies or victims to any hospital or morgue. The Iraqi regime evacuated some 90 itroops to ar-Ramadi. About 100 troops from the 4th Infantry Division were reported to be stationed at the base at the time, with only a few slight injuries  reported.\n\nRemains of US Falcon arsenal have been described as “burned out wasteland with no buildings.” US helicopters dumped water on site to extinguish flames for two days. Officials estimate US monetary loss could exceed US$1 billion. Satellite pictures and aerial photographs from neutral sources showed that Camp Falcon suffered major structural damage and a lot of the U.S. military’s supply of small arms ammunition, artillery and rocket rounds, tons of fuel, six Apache helicopters, an uncounted but large number of soft-skinned vehicles such as Humvees and supply trucks were damaged or totally destroyed.\n\nThere was tremendous physical property damage sustained by the US and Iraqui forces, but fortunately everyone really did get out alive and OK.  There have been a couple minor burns reported.  As for the false lists of so called casualties. If you look carefully at these lists, you will notice that several names included are from previous military losses. Funny how these names keep showing up at various battles.  The Arab news sites are of course giving very vague unsubstantiated claims of great loss of life.  \n\nI think this should have been given more coverage, but only because of the huge financial loss that has been suffered, not the false, inflammatory and grossly exagerated claims of death.\n\nThere are hundreds of sites on the web accusing the US of covering this situation up.  If there had truly been the 300+ casualities being claimed by some, the left leaning, liberal media would have had a hay day.  That would have been news that would have sunk the Republican political candidates. The fact that there is no reporting being done except by the fringe media means that there were no deaths.
105011
DO YOU know that AL Queda is killing innocent people everywhere from NYC to the Philipeans to Sri Lanka to Saudi Arabia to Iraq?\n\nOur troops go out of their way to avoid killing innocent Iraqis.  Al Qedia doesn't care.
891702
Highly doubtful.  We are likely to keep a "garrison" there for quite some time.  We still have bases in Saudi Arabia etc.  Which btw- is one "sore point" with Osama on why he declared jihad against the US.
768517
they wont hesititate to kill us if they had the chance, we should extend the same courtesy. iraq really wasnt much of a threat, but these guys are nutballs and letting them have nuclear weapons is just crazy. if they get them i bet they use them sooner or later, or give them to someone who will
277705
Don't listen to KKiaserdrago he must be all of 12. Our Military right now is being stretched to its limit. We're throwing all our resources into a war that makes no sense. And did we really catch the guy who masterminded the sept 11th bombing. No we didn't he's still out there plotting. I think we need to pull the guys back here and start protecting our own land here before shipping them overseas to fight in a wasteful war that's getting hundreds of our boys killed for nothing.
194669
not so easy my fraind.the millitary was humilated and destroyed by saddam the moment he took over,the iraqi armed forces faught a bloody long and intensive war with iran for 8 years.by 88 the armed forces where exhausted,& so was the economy.before they gathered breeth ,they were thrown in kuwait where they were never ready for,and without the consultation of of even the chief of staff or the minister of defence.strange isnt it!!!!.the armed forces were so weak that the ordinary soldir was not able to get more than a stony pice of bread every two days.no logistic support.tanks were in no fighting readeness,you could see that on what was called the victory parade held in baghdad in winter 89,with the heavy smoke of the tanks & apcs engaines that blocked the vission.at that time the coalition was announcing that the iraqies have the 5th strongest army and they threat saudia arabia and the peace of all the world.halfe a million men with 2500 war plkanes and huge numbers of the most modern weapons slaughtered that weak army during its retreat in 91.the order of retreat was given by saddam at the last momment,it was a desaster for an army cant retreat in one day.plus,no one belived the order,because saddam himself stressed manytimes that the millitary must not retreat even if they hear his personal voice in the radio,cause his enemy is capable of forging his voice.after that there was blockade and sanctiones for 12 years.no new arms,no ammunition,no equipments,no spare parts.what ever was left of air crafts was grounded.by 2003 the iraqi armed forces were reduced to skeleton forces,very low moral,(the general was paid less than 30 us$ p/m as a salary).what was left was only small arms.noe,how can any one fight the abrams tank and f-117,or cruise missiles with rpgs or ak-47.who can fight without air fotce or navy.why should the forces fight when they feel that they are humellated for 35 years.who agrees to gight under the command of a dirty kid(his son)or an ice seller?who ius ready to have his children orphaned and wife widowed with no one to take care of.should they die so that saddam become richer and his sonesrape more of the iraqi girls.the armed forces felt that they were strange in thair land.they refused the slavery .it was totally idiotness millitarilly to face such a mighty force with nothing.that is why they didnt fight.no honest man can blame the iraqi millitary for not fighting with honour,but fighting has its conditions.
685819
you arent having to defend your house with your own weapon are you?\n\nthey're doing a great job..\n\nif they wanted to end this war faster, they would've buried their enemies upside down in pig feces (apparently that makes them go to "hell")\n\nits what they did in the philippines to stop the islamic extremists from taking over
201289
it wont do any good, but they cant be allowed to possess a weapon based on what they have said in the past -- note, they are already funding fighters in Iraq against us, so they ARE in fact trying to pick a fight with us.
890804
David, glad to see you are thinking well at such a young age!\n\nIraq had nothing to do with terrorism before the invasion.\n\nIn fact, had Osama bin Laden been in Iraq prior to the removal of Saddam, he would have done everything he could have done to kill him as well.  Osama was not trusted or liked by Saddam.  Fanatics are a threat to all nation's, not just free ones.\n\nThe terrorists that bin Laden leads were OUR ally in the Afghani war against the former Soviet Union.  We trained and supplied them during that conflict.  That is why they are so effective at attacking us now.\n\nThey didn't turn their attention towards us until we placed a permanent base in Saudi Arabia.  That base, in Riyadh, was near Mecca and Medina, two of the holiest cities in the Muslim faith. They saw it as an affront to their faith that infidels (Non-Muslims) were so close to those cities.\n\nThe Iraqi battlefield has degenerated into civil war and insurgency, not necessarily terrorists.  \n\nIf we were occupied by  foreign force, we would be doing anything we could to repel them.  That is the part the current administration doesn't understand.
680241
a) Because, having been attacked on our own soil, we really did not want that to happen again. So, we pick someone who we already knew we could beat (Saddam), in an area of the world guaranteed to tick off our enemies (Iraq, holy sites all over), with the added benefit of there being a brutal dictator in charge so we could tout how freedom loving we were. Now that we've invaded it, the terrorists are blowing up either (1)trained military troops, whose job it is to die for our country (as opposed to children flying to a school field trip), or (2)other Muslims, thereby sowing hatred and discontent between people who will find it easier to kill each other than Americans.\n\nb)Having lost his mind, Saddam decided to thumb his nose at the world community, saying the UN had no power over him, thereby giving us the pretense to invade. We really DID believe, at least some of our leaders, that there was the thread of WMD, so it was a nice reason as well. WMD was the 'slavery in the Civil War' issue, to get support for the war. \n\nc)A HUGE portion of the US military is now dead-center in the middle east. It's called Projection of Power. The most dangerous potential enemies are there...look at Iran's nuclear ambition. It would take a matter of weeks to be in Tehran.\n\nd)Oil...if we need it. We're paying way more for gas than we ever have in the US. This war was not about the oil of the current day...but about oil in the future. At very least, we can leave people in power that will be more friendly to us than have been in the past.\n\nWars are about power and resources. That's what this one was about, but it was more about power than resources. This was the US projecting its power in order for another 9/11 to not occur (on US soil...if Arabs fly planes into the Grand Mosque of Sandy Suffering, that's okay.)