Is there any medicine found for lungs cancer?
117090
Small cell and non-small cell lung cancer can both be treated with chemotherapy.
33252
the most commmon type of lung cancer is bronchioloalveolar carcinoma, however there are several kinds.\n\nI think however, that you are referring to \n"pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis"\nwhich translates to mean a disease of the lungs resulting from the inhalation of very fine silicate or quartz dust -- usually from industrial pollutants.  This also happens to be the longest word in the English language. (hold your cursor over the word to see the entire spelling --yahoo only shows part for some reason) \n\nThe dictionary defines it as "a factitious word alleged to mean 'a lung disease caused by the inhalation of very fine silica dust' but occurring chiefly as an instance of a very long word" There are strong indications that the word was coined by puzzler Everett Smith in 1935 as a hypothetical long word that could result from the protraction of medical terms. The actual name of the disease is pneumoconiosis, which is 14 letters long.\n\n...didn't expect such a long answer did you?  I suppose its only fitting for such a long word...lol.
404150
i believe it was lung cancer.
787128
I don't think there is a chemo drug that goes by that name. You may be referring to "TARCEVA." Tarceva is used for treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of at least one chemotherapy regimen.\n\nHere is a list of chemo drugs:\nhttp://www.chemocare.com/bio/\n\nHope this helps.
1007936
P Lung cancers tend to spread very early, and only\n15% are detected in their early stages. The chances of early detection, however, can be improved by seeking medical care at once if any of the following symptoms appear:\n• a cough that does not go away\n• chest pain\n• shortness of breath\n• persistent hoarseness\n• swelling of the neck and face\n• significant weight loss that is not due to dieting or vigorous exercise\n• fatigue and loss of appetite\n• bloody or brown-colored spit or phlegm (sputum)\n• unexplained fever\n• recurrent lung infections, such as bronchitis or pneumonia However, these symptoms may be caused by diseases other than lung cancer. It is vital, however, to consult a doctor to rule out the possibility that they are the first symptoms of lung cancer. If the lung cancer has spread to other organs, the patient may have other symptoms, such as headaches, bone fractures, pain, bleeding, or blood clots. Early detection and treatment can increase the chances of a cure for some patients. For others, it can at least prolong life.
585478
Look on NCBI for curcumin or turmeric and cancer.  These are natural spices which have an anticancer effect, and have been well investigated.  \n\nBasically what you'll do is grind up plants and make extract, then do studies for proliferation of cancer cells.
948259
Over 100 cures for cancer are available, but are supressed by the authorities because cancer is big business.\n\nSee this page.\nCancer\nhttp://dgwa1.fortunecity.com/body/cancer.html
1118891
Yes it can spread or "metastasize".  One of my first cousins recently died of it.  He was in his early 50's and by the time he died the cancer had spread to his bones, [mainly his spine] as well as to his brain.    Anytime it spreads to the bones you can expect significant pain.\n\nIf you are interesting in learning more, http://www.lungcanceronline.org/\n\nhas lots of info.
577
Please listen to me as I am only here to help. You have to do exactly as I say. Go to the website and look up CESIUM CHLORIDE AND OXYGEN DROPS. The other ones could be green algae and paw paw, etc etc. These medicines are known in the medical field, but they dont talk about it. Because these are natural remedies with no toxic chemicals in it. So, thats why they cant profit from it. If they cant profit, they dont sell. I mean, some are even made of mushrooms that you can grow anywhere. Why would they promote this? These doctors will never make money. So, the FDA has put a restriction on these remedies. They cannot say anything about cancer on their labels. They have to be sold as vitamins or health products. But, the website can tell you how to use it, and what cancers it can cure. See how they are suppressing the world? In fact these treatments can cure up to 90% of patients that doctors have already given up on. Chemo therapy is not a therapy. I would rather die then go through with that. They try to kill your cancer with chemicals and radiation. If they kill all your cancer before they kill all your body cells, then they consider you cured. But, what about after that? Your body is damaged and your health deteriorated. There is almost no recovery to this. How many people you know live past 5 years after chemo therapy? Not much if any at all. And compared to the masses, its almost nothing. What do you have to live with after chemo? Your body is not sunburned, its practically microwaved. CESIUM CHLORIDE can be taken with OXYGEN DROPS. Go to the websites. You can go to these websites and they will give a whole package for you to buy. You can take these medicines over the course of 3 months, a year, or whatever they prescribe. After your mom is feeling well, taking it for about 2 months or more, you can almost garauntee that you are cured. But, you have to listen to them and take it till they tell you to stop. They even cure certain 3rd stage cancers with a 90% success rate. But, time is of the essence so I urge you to buy it as soon as possible and take next day delivery or something. I wish you the best of luck in the future. But, heed my warning, do not go into chemo. They always tell you something fuzzy like, oh..you might live another 2 years, or you might die right away..etc etc....Then how do you decide? But, they always say that people who have been on chemo will only live a maximum of X years after that.  So, if you do exactly what I say, not only will you have a chance to survive, but all your friends that may get cancer...
762971
Yes there are in Homeopathic Medicine, when prescribed exactly according to the patients symptoms they have been curing and will keep on curing Cancer patients successfully and without any side effects or complications. The Law of Similars  "Homeopathy" is the most amazing way of curing anything be it Cancer or a Common Cold they work with 100% efficiency when prescribed according to the patients symptoms not of the disease.\n\nTake Care and God Bless you !
886291
Stage 3 lung cancer refers to non small cell lung cancer, which is divided into four stages. Stage 1 is the early stage in which a small tumor is discovered in one lung. Surgery is the preferred mainstream treatment because there is hope of removing all the tumor and any localized cancerous tissue.\n\nRecently, the issue of the use of chemotherapy after surgery at this early stage was settled by two studies that showed chemo improved survival. The combination of surgery to excise the tumor in the lung and chemo to prevent the growth of cancer cells elsewhere in the body proved to be valuable to the patient's lung cancer prognosis. Once the early stages advance to stage 3 lung cancer, however, questions about treatment depend on what lymph nodes are involved, and how extensive the tumor has become.\n\nStage 3 Lung Cancer Treatments \nIf, for example, a lung tumor has reached any vital organ such as the heart, surgery is probably not an option. A combination of radiation and chemotherapy may be used to shrink the tumor so surgery can be performed. This combination may also be used with patients who have other diseases or health problems that preclude surgery.\n\nIf a surgery candidate has emphysema or other lung disease, tests in addition to those that are normally run before surgery will be conducted to make sure the patient can successfully undergo an operation. There are several surgery techniques that are employed, but the most common is a lobectomy, which involves removing the entire lobe of the lung affected by the cancer. Stage 3 lung cancer is perilously close to end stage lung cancer--stage 4--and it requires judgment calls as well as the best mainstream treatment available.\n\n\nGood Luck - he will need all the support you can give.
1135896
Never heard of vitamin D for lung cancer..... everyone dies sometime of something....\n\nTell her to check out Tahitian Noni Juice @ www.tni.com\n\nYour body is WHAT you are IN, not WHO you are...\nNo fear.
935251
gamma knife procedure, surgical, radio, chemo, immuno.  There is hope.  M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston TX can help.  Don't let the past discourage you.  New treatments are winning the battle with even the most invasive cancers.  \n\nhttp://www.mdanderson.org/?gclid=CMzN-8PV2ogCFRgvUAodhHFXeQ
342998
Ok, you can try BCNU. This is FDA approved for GBM.  There are some other things that are not approved that they may try as well.  Like:  Camptosar, oral Etoposide, or even oral Gleevec. I don't think there is any data published about these drugs, but sometimes when there is nothing left, you just have to try.  But, BCNU is definitely approved.  Good luck to this patient.\n\nI just want to comment on the answer below.  I know a lot of people with GBM.  Some have survived 2 years, some even longer, with treatment.  I know one guy who is alive after 4 years (extremely unusual).  Yes, GBM is the worst kind of brain cancer, but it's not completely worthless to try other treatment if Temodar has stopped working.
1141621
A LONG TRAIL OF EVIDENCE LINKS CIGARETTE SMOKING TO LUNG CANCER\n\nAs someone who’s life has been touched by the tragic effects of cigarette smoking, I was saddened last week when the Supreme Court barred the FDA from regulating cigarettes. About 48 million adult Americans smoked cigarettes last year, according to the CDC. That’s one in four people, a fact that astonishes and alarms me. Why? Because this year an estimated 180,000 people will be diagnosed with lung cancer in the United States, and 90% of them will die within three years -- and 96% of these cancer victims are cigarette smokers.\n\n\nIs there a cause-and-effect connection between smoking cigarettes and lung cancer? Two years ago, I wrote my first columns for the Post Dispatch, explaining the scientific evidence that cigarette smoking causes lung cancer, and that cigarette smoking is addictive. If these two points are indeed true, then cigarettes , so much a part of American life, are in fact an addictive deadly drug! In the hope of encouraging readers to urge congress to act, I am reprinting these columns. In today’s column we will follow the trail of evidence that proves clearly that smoking causes cancer. In next week’s column I will examine the evidence that smoking tobacco is addictive.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nPOINTING THE FINGER AT CIGARETTES\n\n\nThe long trail of evidence linking cigarettes to lung cancer has its beginnings right here in St. Louis, at Washington University’s School of Medicine. In 1948 a young first-year medical student, Ernst Wynder, witnessed an autopsy of a man who had died of lung cancer, and noted the lungs were blackened. Curious, he looked into the background of the patient. There was no obvious exposure to air pollution, but the man’s wife revealed he had smoked two packs of cigarettes a day for thirty years! Like a dog with a juicy bone, Wynder had found a puzzle that would occupy him much of his professional life, and despite much controversy, he never let go of it.\n\n\nOver the next two years, Wynder doggedly reviewed records to see if there were other cases linking cigarettes and lung cancer. He found that many lung cancer patients were smokers. Interviewing lung cancer patients and "control" patients with other cancers, far more cancer occurred among the smokers. Early in 1950 he published his results in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Comparing 649 lung cancer patients with 600 controls, he found lung cancer an incredible 40 times higher among smokers, with the risk of cancer increasing with the number of cigarettes smoked.\n\n\nLater that year, Richard Doll, a well known British scientist, reported an even more convincing finding linking smoking to lung cancer. Over a period of years, Doll had interviewed quite a large number of physicians, inquiring of each about their smoking habits -- then waited to see which ones developed lung cancer. Overwhelmingly, they were the smokers. Because it was not "after the fact", Doll’s test of the smoking causes cancer hypothesis was particularly rigorous and powerful. From that day forward, the scientific case linking smoking to lung cancer has been clear-cut.
406848
I'm so sorry but there is no definitive answer.  It depends on so many things:  type of cancer (some types spread faster than others...and I am not referring to lung, bone, etc cancer...I mean specific type), whether or not treatment is being done, the person's desire to live (many live much longer than they should due to fighting hard and their belief in a higher power), etc.\n\nAll you can do is make each day count...live each day to the fullest and enjoy it wholeheartedly.  I'm so sorry.
824084
well i would try consulting a pulmonary doctor to see what kind of medication would help