lS CHENEY THE LEAKER?
105820
I believe Mr. Cheney wears depends!\n\nSo if he was the leaker, the world may never know!
40829
im not sure who it might be but the bible says hes supposed to be from europe and the european union, so its  not bush or cheney. and yes i will deny him.
1186136
I'm with you on this one, this administration is so corrupt and devious that I wouldn't put anything past them, hopefully Cheney's heart will explode soon and the monkey will be impeached.
850067
Interesting, but I think the truth lies closer to reality that he wanted to stay in the closet, repuglicans do not like to be outed,as repuglicans are not very tolerant of Gay's. When is the last time that Dick Cheney mentioned his daughter in a political speech. Probably about the twelfth of never.
1092074
yes! If any of these stories would have came up on Clinton's watch, he would have been impeached before the next news cycle. After all, he was nearly ousted over a stained dress. Yet this prez has a gay male prostitute visiting him for 2 yrs and was it never even mentioned in the main stream media. A new, more damaging story is put out nearly everyday, and before it gets much discussion, its topped by a next new one and is never heard of again. The media was all over Clinton for a host of trivial things like Travel-gate, Whitewater, White House sleepovers and the like. Yet important things done by this administration, that effect EVERY ONE OF US are routinely forgotten. Torture, Katrina, Dubai Ports deal, Airport Insecurity, Haliburton, 9/11, Leaking of CIA agents identities, secret wiretapping programs, OSAMA BIN LADEN, and list goes on & on & on. Where is the media's outrage? Wheres the in-depth reporting? How can the Corperate Media accept the White House's canned answers as a replacement for facts? Get off your BUTTS and dig for the truth. Its not gonna be pretty but it is ESSENTIAL TO DEMOCRACY!!!
698831
No, Dick Cheney got in serious trouble this year for leaking the name of a CIA agent. So basically the answer is; if the vice president can't get away with it than nobody else can.
862489
You just can't trust anything Bush says. \nHere's my take on the Rumsfeld resignation. With Democrats taking control of the House and Senate, they will begin investigations for the Bush administration's failures and most likely more. I am really wondering why Republicans have had private talks with Henry Kissinger very recently. Quite possibly, damage control. If you look back to the 70's, Kissinger was part of the Nixon team, when Watergate was investigated. \nBush is trying to raise his popularity rating whether he'll admit it or not.  He'll say anything to make himself look good. Bush only confuses himself not us, not all of us. Bush can't keep the story straight because, he doesn't understand the plot. I think he may finally begin to realize that it's not about him. I am wondering if anyone else saw that none of Bush's best buds were present at the press conference yesterday. No Cheney, no Laura Bush. Does Bush have children anymore?Parents? Must be lonely in the Duck Pond.
946838
Texas attorney Harry Whittington...a "friend" of Cheney.\n\nYa know, with friends like that....
2757
As far as I know other than no longer showing up at White House press conferences, nothing.  I don't think he did anything illegal.  There are still questions about how and why he was allowed to stay overnight many, many times at the White House.  Why, exactly, was a homosexual male escort posing as a conservative newspaper reporter allowed to spend the night so many times?  It sounds like someone may have had some really weird, twisted sexual fantasy.  And, no, I'm not pointing any fingers.  It could have been any number of people at the White House.\n\nIt strikes me as a sickeningly freakish thing, but ultimately not too terribly horrible, and not illegal.  If someone in the White House has the hots for butch, gay escorts pretending to be homosexual hating conservative newspaper reporters, then more power to them.
469209
I think if he was, It would have been in the papers and on the news. Who told you he was? Check People.com or something like that. But I think someone is pulling your leg.
488895
No, they leak a CIA operatives name! You really believe anything the governmeny has on anybody is confidential?\n\nEven if it were confidential, which means whatever they want it to mean, I don't want someone getting information on me without my knowledge. And why would they even want it?
959211
It may be a leak from pentagon.....a convinient one...
190272
Just because the press isn't reporting it doesn't mean it's not happening. Rest assured, if he so much as steps out of his cave to take a leak one of those CIA drones will see him and turn him into a red mist.\n\nAnd no, finding him will not bring the troops home. He is one of many terrorists we still have to kill.
1098485
EXACTLY!!!\n\nThere is a story circulating right now about the Bush administration, ONCE AGAIN, violating privacy laws by getting access to all banking/financial transactions; although, they claim to have only looked at international transactions. They have the authority to do this BUT not until they go before a judge and get approval. Of course with Bush not believing in the consitution, he did not do that = broke the law AGAIN!!\n\nNow, to counter this Bush has been bombarding talk radio and Fox News (even saw an upset guy on pbs The Newshour yesterday about it) with propaganda that does not explain the entire story as I did in the first paragraph. \n\nTheir defense is we are in a 'war on terror'. So, basically because we are in a war on terror, they believe they can ignore all the laws and ppl's right to privacy, etc...\n\nSo, as you stated... with them attacking the press for reporting this story.. there goes freedom of speech and the press.\n\nBtw, the laws about a reporter revealing his/her source are very vague. A reporter does have the right to tell his/her source but most don't because that hinders ppl from wanting to tell them things later. I personally think that if someone tells a reporter something and the act of telling is in itself breaking the law then the reporter SHOULD be required to tell his/her source. IE, this Carl Rove thing about the CIA agent leak. We all know he was behind that but the reporter won't tell.
563112
I was originally as surprised by this unexpected announcement last Friday as you were, planksheer. But as one of your subsequent questions indicates, we may have the answer: the "new" Watergate scandal. I think goss was up to his neck in the illegal gambling and prostitution ring that was being operated by these upper level ANP swine and bush threw him over the side as soon as his intelligence people made him aware of the facts -- and especially the consequences. \n\nThat said, bush may well not have been happy with his hand-picked appointee's track record at the agency. Reports suggest goss routinely butted heads with old guard CIA officials who basically refused to cooperate with him (and who can blame them?). Clandestine organizations like that operate best when upper level officials are more or less on the same page and no one is out to make waves or set himself up as potentate, as goss apparently attempted to do. We should know more about all of this as leaks begin spouting (i.e., very soon).\n\nAnd I share your concerns about this new appointee, gen. michael hayden. He is thick as thieves with Dr. Evil (aka dick cheney) and that alone is enough for me to wish him to never make it out of committee. The fact that he headed up the illegal domestic spying program would, in normal times, be enough for him not even to be under consideration. Indeed, he'd likely be fighting his way through court trying to avoid prison time. This country -- or at least the government alleged to represent us -- in its present state is clinically insane.
825090
Yes, and he also said Cheney is staying.\n....neeeext?????
1047264
I can tell you exactly what that smell is....Vice President Cheney took another guy hunting!\nHe didn't shoot him but got close,\nthe smell is the guys underwear.