is time definite or indefinite. pls explain.?
110752
Definite. Time will always go on, even after everything else is gone.
478107
It is called the equation of time. It isn't really statistics though.
530365
scientifically there is no past present or future. they are only words we use in referrence while using our standard clocks. time is measured by differently by how you use it. if we lived on jupiter instead of earth our referrence of a year would be way longer.\n\non a scientific note you are write but it is important to use past present and future referrence so that you dont get instances confused. time is usually organized in chronological order becuase that is how we veiw things in first person instead of thinking outside of the box.\n\npast is usually meant as in referrence to something that has already happened.\n\nnow is usually referring to an even that just happened or is currently happening or will happen in the close future.\n\nfuture is often referred in long distances like weeks,months,years,decades,centuries,and milliniums.\n\nI realize that when you say "the universe was born just now" you are referrering on a larger scale of time. as in billions of years. your just shortening your meaning of that referrence of relation to our daily lifes to something that we can logically think about.
767465
I had taken algebra. Past tense.\nI ran versions of both sentence structures thru Microsoft Words grammar checker, and it didn't flag either one.
893508
here:\nclass time\n{\n   int t;\n   public:\n   time() : t(0) {} \n   time(int x) : t(x) {}\n   time(int m, int s) : t(m*60+s) {}\n   int m() {return t/60;}\n   int s()  {return t%60;}\n   operator int () {return t;}\n};
874261
Definitely past tense. You will make statements about things that "have happened" in the past, as opposed to things that "are happening" in the future.
485198
What time will your plane arrive? (Asks future tense, not present perfect - basically its the only one that sounds normal.)\nBy the time he comes home, I will have finished dinner. (Tense is correct.  Specifies event passed not event occuring)\nHe can predict how many people will be living in these regions.  (Can predict specifies indefinite future)\nThey will soon be able to solve the problems. (The other one simply does not make sense.)\nAccording to the timetable, the plane arrives at 7PM (For all I've been taught you want to avoid wordiness and to be verbs.  I'm honestly not really sure on this one.)
1069423
beginning today at 23:00 and ending Tuseday at 1:00\nthese are three days. Am I correct?
893783
Time is always now, now, now. We only really are certain about the present; our memory & evidence of the past, and our ;assumptions about the future. The past and future dont really exist, because they  dont exist now. The past used to exist, but doesnt exists now except what we know about it. The future will exist but doesnt exist now and so we don't experience it. \n\nTime continues on at a steady pace all the time as far as we know. There are theories that time has relation to other things, that time is affected as you approach the speed of light, but we haven't fully explored this theory. \n\nTime exists as more then that but only as a concept. We have words for many things that don't exist or that exist only as concepts.
1156487
The accurate answer to your second question is "not really".  Our current system for measuring time is based on the movements of our planet & our solar system, which of course did not exist in their current state at the beginning.  Those units, however, have been standardized for convenience & accuracy to reference the cesium atom, so can be back-calculated.\n\nThe answer to your first question is that time began at the instant of the so-called 'big bang'.  Before that there was nothing to reference it again, so the passage of time had no meaning or substance.\n\nWeird, huh?
958698
If t is the time that has been measured in the clock's reference frame, then t/2 is the time that has been measured by the observer.\n\nNow t = (t/2)[1-(v^2)/(c^2)]^(1/2)\n\nthe t's cancel and you are left with 1 = (1/2)[1-(v^2)/(c^2)]^(1/2)\nor [1-(v^2)/(c^2)]^(1/2) = 1/2\n\nsquare both sides to get 1 - (v^2)/(c^2) = 1/4\n\nsubtract one from each side to get -(v^2)/(c^2) = -3/4\n\nor (v^2)/(c^2) = 3/4\n\nthis means that v^2 = (3/4)(c^2)\n\ntaking the square root of both sides gives the final answer:\n\nv = [3^(1/2)]c/2.\n\nNot the most intuitive answer in the world.
23129
Dude its gotta be tomorrow!!!! cuz i mean, tomorrow is always coming, but like tomorrow is never here! its always... tomorrow! I mean you say like tomorrow i'm going to the movies, then tomorrow comes but right when it gets here, its today. So today is never tomorrow cuz that'd just be silly. TSo the answer is tomorrow!!!
181792
a Thursday's yesterday is Wed.\n\nso, saying the first part differently:\n\n  "If the day after tomorrow's yesterday is Wed....."\n\nTommorow's yesterday is today.\n\nSo, revising the first part again:\n\n  "If the day after today is Wed......"\n\nSo "today" must be Tues.\n\n6 weeks and a day after Tuesday is a Wed.\n\nAnswer: WEDNESDAY\n\nAt least I explained it!
1104806
The concept of time is that it does not exsist. Time is on earth to put events in a cronological form. In the Universe or 'heaven' time is not a concept. Life outside of earth and our bodies has not end
956823
Either *could* be grammatically correct, but they have different meanings.  In the first example, you are suggesting that travel is possible, but not definite.  "I don't definitely travel tomorrow; I might wait until the next day" is a grammatical sentence.  In the second example, you are clearly saying that you will not travel--it is definite.\n\nBut the first version is awkward, even if that is the meaning you intend.  It would be far better to say, "I may not travel," if that's what you mean.\n\nGood luck!!
291753
"When" is not a question- rather an assertation of the eventuality of all things.  As all things are in constant change; eventually, all things become all things.  There is no "if", only "when".\n\nFurther, "now", is the essence of this very moment.  Just as an object can either be precisely measured in space or velocity- but not both- so is the everchanging world around us measurable only in the moment.  "Now" is synonymous, therefore, with "what".\n\nSince all things in their eventuality are the same, and yet immeasurable when removed from their essence, and all things measured are themselves momentary, so too are all things when, all things if, all things now, and all things what.  The world defies our attempts to measure it, and escapes our understanding as soon as we require it.
433550
Well, time really doesn't exist. It's a human invention. We define time as what it is because our minds can't fully comprehend the fact that the universe is one big giant now. So nothing begins, or goes away, because everything happens at the same time. We choose to say it happens at different times, but it really happens in different places, on different planes of existence.