Schneb, Is there really a guard to get past?
106125
Heeeww, alot of opinions. But just like the Bible, only the author's interpretation is the correct one. ;)\n\nFor those who stumble at the thought of comparing God to man... it is just a parable or analogy. After all, did not Jesus do this with the prodigal son? Or was He blowing it as well?\n\nOK, Heron, here is the skinny. The guard is that which blocks personal fellowship with God. I can describe it no better than Isaiah did in chapter 59...\n\nBehold, the LORD’s hand is not shortened, that it cannot save; Nor His ear heavy, that it cannot hear. But your iniquities have separated you from your God; And your sins have hidden His face from you, so that He will not hear.\n\nSo to all of those commenting above, yes, God is capable of hearing all who call. But if there is sin in your life, it will cause a seperation. Eliminate the sin barrier, and you have instant access. This is why we needed a Savior.\n\nSo, what my study says is that we need a mediator, someone to go before us and grant us access. Job lamented that he had no such mediator to go before him to a holy God (see Job 9) It says in 1 Timothy 2:5\n\nFor there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus.\n\nSo, we accept Christ into our hearts as Lord and Savior for the forgiveness of sin. Through His blood we are made clean, thus eliminating the "guard" and granting us access. Now we can speak to God, not as some fearful omnipotent Creator, but as our Father in heaven. As we get to know and love Him, we realize through the promises in the Bible that we have been adopted as sons and daughters wherein we can cry out, "Abba!"\n\nThis point was so important for me to teach my kids, that while they were growing up, they learned to call me Abba instead of Dad. Because I want them to know that when they read this promise in the Bible, they will know immediately what it means.\n\nRomans 8:15\nFor you did not receive the spirit of bondage again to fear, but you received the Spirit of adoption by whom we cry out, “Abba, Father.”\n\nGalatians 4:6\nAnd because you are sons, God has sent forth the Spirit of His Son into your hearts, crying out, “Abba, Father!”\n\nThe whole point of "Getting Past the Guard" was to put in earthly terms a parable about the eternal realm. It is not an easy task, but it has caused at least a few people to come to know Jesus as Savior. And for that I am thankful and all the angels in heaven rejoice.
621303
No.  \n\nYou know, couldn't we monitor this with a satellite that's tuned into the the temperature of humans?  Humans are pretty much always 98.6, and if they're not, then they won't get far.\n\nAnd as for the fence, it is supposed to be fancy.  It will be like three walls, one of which is going to be concrete and about 13 feet high, from what I've heard.  It may not stop them but it will sure slow them down.  The trick is putting it in the right places.\n\nAs as for landmines, this is out of the question.  But what about landmines that only broadcast that they've been stepped on, and the weight that was exerted on them (so we can tell the difference between a rabbit and a human)?\n\nAlso, regarding those citizens that want to get involved, we should all independently investigate companies to look for those that employ illegals.  This should seriously increase enforcement.
531639
by his URL...\n\n\nits the only way... then search for an open DOOR...\n\nwhattda...POLICEEEEE.... youve been setup dude...
1010763
being sneaky and tricky
835025
Sometimes one solution works and sometimes the other. The guards like to play with human life and the survivor must trust his instinct at all times.  I would suggest the naked prisoner prays for an answer.
368447
Maybe he is being Cautious about this ?
923233
I'm pretty sure he doesn't HAVE to carry one.  He probably has the choice to or not.  He won't have to identify himself to anyone, since there will always be Secert Service with him.
307301
If you give up freedom for security, you'll end up with neither.  This is paraphrasing a statement made by that Ben Franklin guy several years ago :)  I think it's true, though.  Who cares if you are safe, if you have no freedom? If I locked you up in a box and kept you under my bed, I could totally protect you and keep you safe from everything... but would it be worth it?
54070
Security guards are to be scorned and ridiculed. Might I suggest playing up the angle that they didn’t have what it takes to be a real cop?
674242
don't worry about it\njust make sure you're in front
217449
Ask, 'Would the other soldier tell me this door leads to freedom?'\n\nIf the answer is yes, then it is the other door. If no, then that is the correct door.\n\nExplanation (sort of): say guard A, by door A (which leads to death), tells the truth and guard B lies; you ask A. B lies, so would tell you yes, A does lead to freedom. So guard A would truthfully tell you that B would say yes. Do you see the logic? I am not brilliant at explaining it, but trust me, it is right!
246495
I am certain that there is always something or someone more powerfull that could hack it.  I think if you get a service that is responcible for loses due to hacking you will be safe.
900862
Well in that respect, you could just about say that every military installation is effectively defended.......there aren't that many stories out there about people trying to sneak on and being successful.    And they do use cameras to help, and I with my own eyes have seen motion detectors being used.......\nWe all know the military has the best technology,  why they refuse to implement Any technology is a clear sign that our gov. doesn't want to stop illegal immigration.  \nAnd them saying a fence won't work, is partly true.....  if they plan on just putting a chain link up...well yea that won't work.  They need to use technology on our border.  And a fence/wall that is not just one little fence.   Layers, razor wires ,concrete, steel.....and they better make sure they take the fence at least 10 ft. underground.
1117049
They are afraid to loose their help.
367145
Guaranteeing security\n \nSecurity issues always play an important role at major events. 32 teams and their managers, thousands of accredited journalists, and millions of spectators all want security before, during and after the World Cup. This is why all those responsible - the Federal Government and federal states (Länder), the venues, stadiums, national and federal state police forces - must work smoothly together. All national and federal state security authorities through to the organisers are preparing a "Nationales Sicherheitskonzept WM 2006" (national security strategy for the World Cup 2006) on the instructions of the Conference of Ministers for the Interior.\n \nAmong other things, the strategy sets out measures for defence against threats of international terrorism and extremism as well as violence by hooligans. It guarantees security of public passenger transport as well as protection against crime and contains plans for dealing with emergencies and disasters and to safeguard the communications technology used.\n \nA wealth of security-related information will accumulate before and during the World Cup. A National Information and Co-operation Centre (NICC) is being set up in the Federal Ministry of the Interior to ensure that this information does not go missing and that it reaches the Federal Government quickly and in a targeted manner. During the World Cup, the NICC will work round the clock to put all security-related information together to form an overall picture of the World Cup 2006.\n \nThe security precautions are however not limited to Germany alone. At the invitation of the Federal Ministry of the Interior, four international conferences with experts from more than 40 countries have already been held. The subjects discussed range from an exchange of experiences with organisers of comparable sporting events through to preparations for international contracts on co-operation between security authorities at the World Cup 2006.\n\n\n----------\n\nIn the following interview, Horst R. Schmidt, General Secretary of the DFB and senior vice-president of the 2006 FIFA World Cup Organising Committee Germany, speaks about the rioting surrounding the match against Slovenia and the consequences for the FIFA World CupTM preparations. \nHerr Schmidt, the riots involving German hooligans surrounding the international in Slovenia thrust this problem back into the spotlight as we look ahead to the 2006 FIFA World Cup. What precautions have you taken to prevent such events from marring the tournament? \n\nSince the DFB prepared its bid to stage the 2006 FIFA World Cup – and the process actually began back in 1993 – we have been working intensively in the area of security at a World Cup. We are doing everything to ensure the highest standards in security. And by “we”, I mean not only FIFA, the OC and DFB, but also the national and state authorities and institutions responsible for security, who have the necessary expertise and decision-making ability. By collaborating closely at all levels, we have devised a security concept for the 2006 World Cup which we develop on an almost daily basis. This living and operational concept is tested on a weekly basis via seamless procedures in Bundesliga stadia and at our home internationals. And now we have problems with German hooligans at away games. As paradoxical as it may sound, these incidents involving German hooligans actually help us to assess the international situation. \n\nWhat concrete measures are being introduced in Germany? \n\nFirstly on the German hooligans. In terms of practical collaboration, our exchanges with the Zentralen Informationsstelle Sporteinsätze (ZIS) are crucial. This organisation manages data on known hooligan football fans, although I would prefer not to refer to these criminals as “fans”. We can take effective action against these individuals in German stadiums in the form of a banning order from all venues. Obviously we are also
701168
There is no such  thing as security.  Given that your decisions will not be based on fear.  to seek security is a fool's errand and will never lead to sound policy.
221197
What i wrote to answers-abuse@cc.yahoo-inc.com::::\n-----\nDear Answers.Yahoo.com,\n\nI disagree with so much that Schneb puts up on Answers.Yahoo.com, but to remove him or to suspend him is a JOKE! He simply would not do anything that would be abusive. I think now that you have set a precedent, anyone can have anyone else removed or suspended simply by complaining enough, even when there is no merit to those complaints. Is there no way to take the complaints and measure them against how often someone has answered, or how often someone's answers have been given thumbs up, or even been voted best answer??\n\nPlease re-instate Schneb. To have removed him is a joke, to keep him off is just immoral, and gives in to those who would abuse their right to complain in order to censor, the last resort of those unable to defend their positions!\n\nThank You,\n\nRabbi Stuart Federow\n   sfederow on answers.yahoo.com