i need a sentence using the word redshift?
100600
A redshift is a shift in the frequency of a photon toward lower energy.
383910
You want to describe the phrase?\n\nOr do you want an equivalent of your long-winded (that describes it) phrase in a single adjective?\n\nPrecambrian or Precambrianic...   ?
941393
The word is "srijan".......\nmeaning"creation"
409115
http://www.rarpasswordcracker.com/?ver=411
777591
Please learn to compose a sentence that makes sense.
488636
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia\n(Redirected from Red-shift)\n\n    This article is about the optical phenomenon. For the photochemical usage, see bathochromic shift. For other uses of the phrase "Red Shift", see Red Shift.\n\nIn physics and astronomy, redshift is an observed increase in the wavelength and decrease in the frequency of electromagnetic radiation received by a detector compared to that emitted by the source. For visible light, red is the color with the longest wavelength, so colors experiencing redshift shift towards the red part of the electromagnetic spectrum. The phenomenon goes by the same name even if it occurs at non-optical wavelengths (in fact, longer-wavelength radiation "redshifts" away from red). The corresponding shift to shorter wavelengths is called blueshift.\n\nAstrophysical redshift occurs, for example, when a light source moves away from an observer in an analogous but not equivalent fashion to a Doppler shift of sound waves from a receding object. Redshift is used as a diagnostic in spectroscopic astrophysics to determine information about the dynamics and kinematics of distant objects. Most famously, redshifts are observed in the spectra from distant galaxies, quasars, and intergalactic gas clouds to increase proportionally with the distance to the object. This is generally considered to be one of the major forms of evidence that the universe is expanding, supporting the Big Bang model.
1100277
In astrophysics last semester we did several things to prove to prove the friedmann equation (equation derived from general relativity that governs the expansion and motion inside the universe).  One of the proofs is the redshift caused by the expansion of the universe (not technically a relative motion but it doesn't really matter).  So here's the evidence.\n\na)The numbers for the redshift/megaparsec cross check perfectly with other independent proofs of the friedmann equation, like the cosmic microwave background.\n\nb)The supernovae we are observing are what's known as a "standard candle" meaning that the intensity, spectrum, and mass can all be determined very accurately by observing the change of the intensity of the radiation as a function of time.  Because of this fact we can take into account the gravitational redshifts.  The end result is that they make up fractions of a percent of the total redshift (I'd have to dig up my note to find the exact answer but it consider that the redshift of far objects is over 90% while the redshift from gravity is on the order of 10^-4% (.0001%).\n\nFinally to answer part of your question.  Light is not redshifted by massive objects on it's path because the gravitational potential is the same upon entering the objects potential well as when it exits.  Put another way it is blueshifted upon entering the objects gravitational pull and equally redshifted back to the original value upon exiting.
1008044
Hi NY NY 2\n\nQuite a hodge podge of answers above.  let me see if I can clear some misconceptions up for you:\n\nFirst, the evidence. About 8 years ago two separate independent groups announced measurements of the brightness of supernova at a redshift z=1.  (Cosmologists use redshift factor "z" to show how far away something is in space-time by designating how far light from the object is redshifted by the time it arrives at earth.  The redshift is due to the expansion of the intervening space.  Redshift z=1 corresponds to a distance where the wavelength of light has been redshifted to double its original wavelength.).  These results indicated that the universal expansion was accelerating.  Since that time the results have been confirmed, and supporting evidence was found in the detailed mapping of the microwave background.\n\nSurprisingly (you might think) it is very easy to modify the equations which describe the universe's evolution to make the expansion accelerate.  The reason for this is that Einstein originally included such a factor in his early equations.\n\nBriefly, the equations for the universe at large scale talk about gravity and pressures.  Gravity tries to collapse the universe together and pressures push it apart (roughly).  When Einstein came up with his model (1915), everyone thought the universe was static (so called "steady state"), ie it didn't change over time.  So he included a cosmological constant to counteract the collapsing action of gravity and keep the universe steady.  This cosmological constant "pushes outwards" to counter gravities inward push.  By 1928 Hubble's catalogue had convinced people the universe was expanding (not steady) and physicists realised the cosmological constant wasn't required.  Einstein called its original inclusion "his biggest blunder".  It seems that call was wrong.  :o)\n\nNow the cosmological constant is coming back.  To describe an expanding universe you stick it back in and change the values for the density of normal mass-energy and the cosmological constant, and voila - an expanding universe.  The question then becomes: what does this constant physically represent?\n\nAt present cosmologists use the term "dark energy" to refer to a number of possible culprits.  From the equations we know the properties of this dark energy very well.  Some physicists link it to action of the quantum vacuum, some label it "quintessence" (the "fifth force").  \n\nIt is *not* (as suggested above) dark matter or antimatter.  Dark matter is invoked to explain galactic dynamics: galaxies tend to rotate in a fashion which suggests they have more mass than we can actually see.  This missing mass is presumed to be dark (which is why we can't see it).  Dark matter would act like ordinary matter in Einstein's equaitons, and so can't produce an accelerated expansion.  Antimatter also behaves gravitationally like ordinary matter and so it can't be responsible for accelerated expansion either.\n\n\nHope this helps!\nThe Chicken
475404
Complete sentence please.
279601
could you please rephrase?
511727
Try: http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases
92761
Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs.\n\nEven 'The quick brown fox jumps over a lazy dog' has more letters than 'Pack my box...', a sentence which is used in the book trade.\n\nETA: It needs to be jumps, rather than jumped, otherwise there is no s.
133999
*Chuckling for such a well thought out question actually has an easy answer* Blueshifted stars...\n\nBlue shift is the phenomenon that the frequency of an electromagnetic wave (such as light) emitted by a source moving towards the observer is shifted towards the blue side of the electromagnetic spectrum (that is, its wavelength is decreased).\n\nAs you would be moving towards those stars and the light they emit is also moving towards you, the Doppler Effect would change the light to a bluish color. The faster you go, the bluer it gets.\n\nIf you were to look behind you, the stars would be redshifted.\n\nFor much more on the topic, see below\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blueshift\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppler_effect\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity
879402
Try:\n\nConfess\nAcknowledge\nOwn\nConcede
785754
Hey j-papa   I can only think of 1\n\nFERRY\n\nI could think of the word TRANSFER with fer at the end.\n\nGood luck with ur homework!!
282376
a word...thats scrambled...\nex: mabelscr! ha ha...that was lame\n\nand you have to figure out what it is!\n\ncan also be a phrase of words that actually makes sense that when rearranged...is turned into another phrase.
755284
how about something rhyming....?\n\n\nWater Evaporation with Color Combination\nEvaporation Eduacation\nEvaporation Acceleration\n\n\nhttp://www.rhymezone.com/