What is your idea about using of Nuclear Energy in IRAN ?
108705
I'm all for the US exporting nuclear energy to Iran, for what it's worth.
347515
Now that is one big question lol. I would say this to you, what do you want from iran?\nOk so Iran gets nukes so what?\nSo they give them to some bad guys so what?\nSo bad guys give them to us like say 3 of our biggest cities. May four cities. Now what do we need to do to Iran?\nHow many got to die before we make a decision?\nIt is coming and soon!!!!!!!!!!
331570
It is evident that Iran's efforts are focused both on uranium enrichment and a parallel plutonium effort. Iran claims it is trying to establish a complete nuclear fuel cycle to support a civilian energy program, but this same fuel cycle would be applicable to a nuclear weapons development program. Iran appears to have spread their nuclear activities around a number of sites to reduce the risk of detection or attack. \n\nIran does not currently have nuclear weapons, and would appear to be about two years away from acquiring nuclear weapons. By some time in 2006, however, Iran could be producting fissile material for atomic bombs using both uranium enriched at Natanz and plutonium produced at Arak. The Natanz facility might produce enough uranium for about five bombs every year, and the Arak facility might produced enough plutonium for as many as three bombs every year.
478437
well obviously you know that one isotope is weapons grade and one is not.  the iranians want the isotope that can be dismantled into nuclear weapons because thats what they plan on doing with it...  the United Nations offered to give them the alternative nulcear energy isotope plant but they refuse... they want the weapons grade, wonder why?
1062670
Minimal. Iran think about possibly looking to get a nuclear power station and threats are made. N korea displays that it has intercontinental capabilities and US says they want to negotiate.\n\nN korea would never use a nuclear weapon. Their weapon just gives them a chip to bargain at the big boys table
100641
If the Iranian students, took holds of nuclear technology, I would be moderately sure they would use it for the benefit of the Persian nation. In the hands of the current Iranian regime, this technology will be used most of all for the sake of destruction. Yes, the Iranian people have every right to enjoy the benefits of the modern science. They would be denied those rights by their fanatical leaders who would use them as a safe guard against the US intervention, and as a threat to Israel, among other countries. That is why, they should not be allowed to have it, it is as stupid, as was making a peace agreement with  Hitler. And it is, once again, the leaders who make the common citizens suffer from their fanatism.\nSo that is my view: the Iranian people should have the nuclear technology, after they change the regime and put sane people to take care of their needs, and not of the needs of Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hizbollah that care not about the Persian nation in the first place.
14936
Khatami was a moderate and tried to get Iran to be more normal.  The current leader, President Ahmadinejad is an extremist that will lead his country into a lot of problems.  He has made comments that threatens to make the Middle East even more unstable than what it is right now.  Iran is moving forward with development of nuclear power.  Officially the want nuclear power to generate electricity, but they have a very large oil supply.  Hmmm... what do you think they want nuclear power for?
226396
Iran has announced that they are going to open an oil market that opperates on the Euro.  That's bad for America because the US dollar is currently the primary currency for international oil trade.  So the United States has announced that Iran plans to have nuclear weapons.  How convenient.\n\ntaz: That's exactly what the US government wants you to think.  It's called propaganda.  Keep in mind that eveything that government agencies say they say for a reason.  They rarely just tell the straight out truth, and the current administration has a particularly notable history of lying.  You should always think about why they're saying what they're saying.
402581
It shouldn't be a first option.  The ideal situation would be an internal revolution in Iran, I can't imagine that the average Iranian is terribly happy with Ahmadinejad and Khamenei though the Iranian police state has so far been able to keep them in power.  I think that diplomatic options need to be exhausted before military options are exercised, but it is up to Iran how far this goes.  If they allow the IAEA in to monitor and verify their claim that they are trying to generate Nuclear power for civilian purposes (which all current evidence indicates is not the case) then the world will probably let them do so, however if Iran begins deploying and/or exporting Nuclear Weapons they will have to be stopped, and it would be imprudent to take any option off the table before their intentions are known.
775119
But are they only making nuclear power stations? The fear is they will infact use these instalations to make enriched uranium or plutionium for use in nuclear weapons. Iran is an unstable country in the hands of fundementalist Islamic clerics and are sworn to eradicate Judism and Christianity. These people can not be trusted with WMD.
35000
In my opinion, I don't think that it is the United States' business to meddle in Iran's Nuclear Program.  Although there is the possibility of terrorism, all I see the U.S. getting out of Iran is oil, just like Iraq.  People really are paranoid about nations with the possibility of producing Nuclear Weapons.  Again, I think Iran should be free to explore its nuclear program, for the power-saving opportunities and such. \n\nThe bottom line . . . \nIran should explore its opportunities with Nuclear Power, and the U.S should keep its nose out of Iran's business.
424885
Only under close supervision  by U.N. Inspectors to make sure the use is only for peaceful generating of electricity and not for making weapons to threaten others with.  Iran has proved to not be a good neighbor in the collective body of nations that inhabit this Earth and it is only right with statements they have made for us to be concerned that their intentions are not purely honorable.  They need to comply with the other nations of the world and prove that their intentions are honorable at which time I am sure that they would be allowed to continue their quest for alternate sources to generate electricity, however not unchecked.
595842
AA my good friend, I think we may AGREE on this one. Iran's primary motivation is to construct nuclear weapons, nuclear power would be a secondary benefit and of course like any good sociopath, Iran is playing the "energy end up" while minimizing (to the outside world) the thought of developing nuclear weapons.
777045
Get your facts straight.  The IAEA just issued a report on the amount of spent plutonium discovered upon inspection, which was far more than was required for a peaceful energy program.  If Iran wants to act like a stubborn child they deserve to be treated like one.
279890
1. The "ambition" of Iran developing its nuclear prorgam is:\n\n   a. Develop nuclear weapons. In all likelyhood North Korea is/will be helping them in this endeavor...since Iran helped N.K. develop their Taepo-Dong ICBMs. They would be developing such capnilities because:\n\n     (1) Be a significant power in the region.\n     (2) Deter Sunni led countries from thinking about \n         trying to fight them.\n     (3) Send a message to the USA..."Your days of being \n         the top dog are nearing an end.\n   \n    b. Develop nuclear power as an energy means. They could also sell excess power to neigboring countries.  \n\n2. "Iran got the itch to become a nuclear power so it too, can be a big player on the world stage. Because of its religious fanaticism, it would be a dangerous and unstable participant in this very exclusive club".\n  Thats the problem... such stereotypical and biased comments (whether racial, relogious, cultural) show the world how arrogant some can be... and with such an "in your face" attitude it is little wonder why many countries no longer support us. Think about this statement for a moment... if you were another country what would you think?\n\n3. "Russia is certainly not a trusted player in this scenario, nor is China. If we are to maintain our status as a true world leader, we cannot allow this unstable, dangerous and troublesome country to gain any more momentum than it already has." \n   Unless we can trust other nations we might as well lock ourselves up and hide. Todays world is all about GLOBALIZATION.. where countries work together. Also, bullying other nations in order to maintain "our status as a true world leader"  is not being a leader...its just being a bully and does nothing but again but show how insecure we are. A "true" world leader means bringing nations together and working for democracy of all.\n\n4. Also, if there's any country which DEFINATELY should not have nuclear capability its North Korea... a more significant threat than Iran. Yet, whats been our policy to deter this? Give them more rice and m$$$y, then after a few months they are back at it... and so it goes...on and on. The bottom line is we should definately have smoked these jokers years ago when we drove them behind the 38th parallel and into China...now we have some nut running their country. And this is okay?\n\n5. Unless we're willing to spend the next 20-30 years fighting wars with the likes of China, Iran, North Korea and others we feel should not have nuclear capabilities...and losing several tens-of-thousands of US lives... then we need to find a way to bring them into the fold peacefully.
359730
iran will use it for peacefull golls .\nbelieve me
253985
If iran is heading for Nuclear power,then the reason is basically to start thinking of ways to produce alternate energy.They know it very well that Oil is not gonna stay there forever and now is the time,though already late but not too late,to start initiating a different source.And,its also to notice that<u just cant use the nuclear energy instantly,u have go through all the tests that goes on for years finally b4 you are actually using the product commercially.US has its own reserve of oil which is biiiig as well,but they prefer to finish off the reserve of the rest of the world first with its monopoly themes and will start rigging full fledged then.Imposing a threat alarm on Iran is nothing but gathering the world opinion to go for a war and start selling stock pile of new weapons and buying oil from Iran with lower price when UN imposes sanction after the first stage of battle finishes.US has created the environment just like the british did when they were the masters of the universe.