This statement is false. Is it therefore true? Logically argue out this.?
112461
Aha! The liar paradox rears its ugly head again....\n\nThe asnwer is - neither true nor false. The propositional content and the semantic content of the statement contradict each other.\n\nTo unpick this paradox, you have to separate the statement from the proposition it contains. \nNote that the proposition has a positive truth value - it claims that "[yadda yadda] IS [bladiblah]"\n\nNow...\n\nIf the statment is true, the proposition that it contains is rendered false, leading to a self-contradiction.\nSo [This statement is false.] is false.\nBut if it is false that the statement is false then the proposition it contains is rendered true, and again the statement is rendered self-contradictory.\n\n(Repeat ad nauseum)\n\nIf you got that, ponder this one. It's a doozy:\n\n"This staitmennt contaynes three mistakes"
153034
No, nobody really can prove it, with assuming several axioms\nfirst. There are certain things you have to assume are true in your universe, without necessary being able to check them. From those axioms, you can derive conclusions (theorems) that are always true, but only in that particular\nuniverse. The discussed operation of addition is one such theorem. If you assume that the axioms of natural numbers are true, then this addition becomes quite trivival. If you assume those axioms of natural numbers to be false, then the above operation of addition might become false with a different set of supposition. In other words, only with the facts given, one cannot prove, nor disprove, the fact of addition. It all depends on the set of assumptions you would have made before adding the two ones.
472136
False. For example: F(x)=x^2 increases for x>0.\n\nF(x)=x^3 always increases.
557287
If a theory can be proven, then it becomes a proven fact.  I suspect you'll find a lot of denial, even if someone could prove theories like this.
845971
If that's true - it's actually quite clever if you think about it for more than a second or two.\n\nThe question is - is it true?  Please provide a link.  Thanks.
330002
I believe there is logic in everything and everything is created in a logical manner.  Though we may not at once see the logic behind anything, we may at some point discover the rationale behind an event. Yes we can always arrive at the truth through logic.
222273
This question has been asked before - when you write your question, pay attention to the other questions that Yahoo! Answers automatically shows you.\n\nI say so because it's true.
926036
Absolutly not.  Who told you this?
480069
It takes only one example to prove the statement to be false, and I provided one:\n\n(Now, while you may never naturally encounter the set of numbers I used, the definitions of mean and median fit, so the statement is false.)
1148625
Not literally. The statements are made figuratively. I suspect that you already know this.
180043
Umm....  there is no way to disprove it....thats why its called a law, not a theorem.  Also, you need to be more specific.  What ways?  Whats experiments?  \n\nAsk again with  more details and I will help you
108416
none if they are false
681523
Yes.  It can never be proven to be true, but it can be fasified.  If you perform an experiment and it works, it means it works under those conditions.  You keep performing experiments.  If they keep succeeding, the hypothesis is less likely to be falsified, however it still could be.
773839
a) true\nb) false\nc) true\nd) true\ne) false
640012
That's not true - hope someone can clarify this for you
733260
I doubt it.\nHow could someone prove it to be?
62088
it depends if the statement is true to begin with...if it is then the sentence is false..if the statement is false then the sentence is true