What happend in the end of the new Planet of the apes?
103717
Hmmm.  Fair enough question, but I really don't know the answer.  I'm a serious Apes lover, but this didn't make sense.  I think they were trying to somehow make it a more Boulle-like ending, but I think it failed dismally.  \n\nI'm guessing that what happened is that Thade took another pod from the Oberon and used that to travel back to the past.  Because of the "bend in time" he ended up landing on the planet hundreds of years BEFORE Leo Davidson.  It follows the same scheme (a bend in time) as the trip that Leo and Pericles took in the beginning of the film.  \n\nWhatever.  It was a good try at a reimaging, but Planet of the Apes 2001 just doesn't play as well with me as the original (1968) Planet of the Apes.\n\nJust before you choose an Answerer, why not write your opinion as an update to your question.  I'd love to read it.
511071
"Last stand", my bum!\n\nIt's Hollywood and Marvel we're talking about, mates. If there's money to be made you know they're gonna make the X4. No matter what the X3 was called or what statements they've made. There was no closure at the end of X4. Too many threads were left hanging, too many possibilities were presented. Sure the were character deaths, but this is X-MEN, for crying out loud! It's like Toad said in X1: "Don't you people ever die?" And, I'm afraid (and G-D forbid), the answer to that is no.\n\n(And yeah, I know I'm ranting. Can't help it. ;)
422753
Just because man evolved from apes does not mean that the apes have been wiped out or replaced in that process.But what actually happened is that around 2-3 million years ago a group of apes started moving from their habitat in the African heartland toward the drier northern regions.As a result of changing climate and ecology They had to make certain adaptations in order to survive and thus these apes started evolving into humans wheres the groups which stayed back carried on with their existing traits because those characteristics were suitable for their habitats.So you have to understand that evolution takes place because there arises a need to change which can be attributed to change in ecology,climate,population etc...And it is only this group which is subjected to change conditions and it is only this group that actually evolves.
575261
Congo-it is based on the book by the same nut that wrote Jurassic Park.\n\nThe movie is bizarre and somewhat badly acted-I remember it being so surreal and can understand how as a child maybe of 6 or 7 you could think it was a bizarre dream-but the reality is it is real film and unfortunately a true nightmare please be safe. Apes are everywhere.
1018602
I dont remember them all but let me put in a little info.\n\nFirst: The one major deleted Scene i can tell you was there was a meeting between mon Mothma (wish they hadnt deleted her scene since it was such news as to how she would look a lot younger. Admirl Ackbar, Padme and some others. they were talking about how Palpetine was too powerfull and if he retained his power they should try to fight him. This was entitled (i think) "Rebellion Birth"\n\nNow here's the interesting thing.\n\nIn 1983 George Lucas wrote the scripts for Ep 1-3. I came upon copies of these in 1993 at a mall. The original name for Ep 3 was "Fall of the Republic"\nIt had a..... differnet twist in the storyline, one i wish they had stayed with.\n\n1. The jedi learn of a crystal on Mustafar (the lava world) that can bind and balance the force if they get it. Palpetine learns of the same crystal and knows if he gets it, it will bind his powers as emporer. Obi-wan is sent by the jedi and Anakin is sent by Palpetine. The battle over the lava happens at the beggining of the story versus the end of the story. \n\n2. At some point, Padme is captured and imprisoned. When trying to escape (as stormtroopers seize Corouscant under the new Emporer) she is killed in a cross fire between rebels to be and the ST's.\n\n3. To ensure the government will remain loyal to him, Palpetine orders a blockade of Corouscant. Hoping he can keep all the senators on the planet and under his control, a large space battle happens when Ackbar, Mon Mothma, pilots and soldiers who uppose Palpetine's new order attempt to flea the capitol to form the rebellion. \n\nThese were changed but they would have been better left in it.
310352
Spoiler warning!\n\nSolution is given in the source links below.
1089692
*****SPOILER!\n\nSuperman went to find the remains of Krypton, because it had been reported that NASA scientists had found Krypton. When he got there, it turned out that Krypton was a "grave yard". It took him 2 1/2 years to get to the remains of Krypton and 2 1/2 years to return to earth.\n\nThe scenes of Superman visiting the remains of Krypton, will probably end up on the DVD, but they were cut from the final film.\n\nSuperman asked his mother to send post cards to Lois as Clark Kent, so it would appear that Clark is still on earth, but no longer in Metropolis.
595922
Ugh, that movie hardly followed the book even in the slightest! Poor Asimov, for that to happen to his work after he died. I would use a clip that explains the three rules of robotics, if there even was such a section in the movie.
868742
My boyfriend changed the channel before they showed what happened to that baby baboon. I always wondered what happened, that is just so sad. I guess the baby would've died from the drought anyway. \n\nI think the show was called Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom: Rumble in the River
896683
I, too, felt a bit confused when I left the theatre. But after I took some time to think about it, I began to understand it better. I am by no means saying I understand it fully now, but here's my current take on the film:\n\nThis film cannot be taken literally, and Darren Aronofsky did not intend for there to be a lot of simple, straightforward, closed answers. Several parts are there for the audience members to make his/her own conclusions.\n\nI think that the only real timeline in the story is the present day one. The other two are Tommy's thoughts/fantasies as ways to deal with Izzi's nearing death. The 16th century timeline can be viewed as Izzi's book, or Tommy's fantasy of himself on a quest for immortality, or both. The 26th century timeline can be viewed as another of Tommy's fantasies of himself searching for immortality. He imagines himself bringing the Tree of Life to the Mayans' Underworld so Izzi can be alive again. The 16th century timeline is more simple fantasy, while in the 26th century timeline he also sorts out his thoughts and fears. It is in this timeline, or during these thoughts, that Tommy comes to terms with death, thus setting in motion the last 5-10 minutes of the film in which he "finishes it": he finishes Izzi's 16th century story as well as the other two timelines in a way that he accepts death and discovers rebirth.\n\nMy take on the Mayan's First Father reference (First Father being the person Izzi pointed out to Tommy in the museum) is that the First Father understood death and rebirth, even if Thomas (the 16th century Hugh Jackman) didn't. The result is Thomas being unable to use the Tree's sap to live forever--because immortality is not meant to be-- and the rebirth is symbolized in his sprouting flowers. The understanding of death and rebirth is shown in Tom-- a character who is separate and yet the same person as Tommy and Thomas-- when he nears the dying star: the tree flowers to life and dying, self-sacrificing Tom is shown with back arched, limbs outward in the same position as the First Father in the museum.\n\nBut even all that is taking the film too literally. I came to understand all this after the film was over, and yet, while I was watching the film, the most important element of the film still came through: the themes of love, life, death, and rebirth, and the message that we must accept these these things. Tommy could not accept death, and yet Izzi neared death with such grace. But finally Tommy, visiting Izzi's grave with a smile on his face, accepted death. For me, this all came though while I was watching the film, and that turned out to still be the most important part once I fit together some of the details.\n\nPlus, confusing plot aside, the film was absolutely beautiful. The cinematography was amazing, the acting-- especially Hugh Jackman's-- was superb, and the music was beautiful. Despite the seemingly incoherency of the film, it was gorgeous, and I believe that several aspects of it deserve an Oscar nod.\n\nI still feel that I would have cut the film a little differently to make it more clear that the future and past timelines are Tommy's fantasies such that the film begins with the present, not the past, and such that each part of his fantasy correlates more to what he just previously experienced in the present. Despite that, I still think Aronofsky put it all together to make it work if the audience is willing to think a bit. "The Fountain" is a beautiful, profound, and momentous film.
1072284
We came from primates(monkeys) before that lizards,fish,bacteria?,  could be anything, what didnt happen was that 2 people were put on a planet that took a week to "make".
974441
The first priority is IQ.\nWithout it that where the mess was created in planet of apes.\nLook at those antiques with creaky legs who came from the cold.\nBack from Russia with love.\nCan't even see the footprints in the snow.\nIn this line of business cheap-skate paper qualification with computer games does not work in planet of apes.\nMust learn to see what the monkeys were up to for the good of mankind in planet of apes.
289892
Now what was that??? It went zooooom... can u pls give some more explanation...
21823
In the original with Charlton Heston, The apes don't let anyone go beyond the forbidden zone because of the terrible secret that is buried there. \n\ncharlton heston's name is Taylor and he lands on the planet after travelling what he thinks is to a distant planet 54 light years way. The planet is so exotic and strange a planet where apes rule and the humans are primitive. \n\nDr Zaius keeps on saying that Man is a terrible beast \nandthat no one should go to the forbidden zone. \nTaylor finally finds out why after he travels through the forbidden zone and sees the statue of liberty destroyed and buried in the desert. he finally realizes what happpend. and he says "they blew it up!damn you all to hell!  because he reaiizes he really landed back on earth, that Man used atomic weapons and destroyed Earth and that the apes came from MAN AND THAT  dr zauis was right about man being a beast.\n\nIn the remake, it was specifically written not to make any sense at all. as if somehow they caused \nthe humans to be apes whene they returned . it makes no sense at all.
675842
the movies aren't following the comics exactly anymore.\nthe writters are taking bits and pieces from random comics.\nscott is gone and soo is jean(maybe i don't see why she would come back tho)\n\nif i was a writter, they would totally get married.
417092
People did not evolve from apes at all.  My beliefs tell me that God created all things and nothing evolved from anything.  If you want to know where you came from and what your here for I URGE you to go to fathersloveletter.com and watch.  TRUST ME!!!!  You will never have any questions about creation, apes, or what u are here for at all.  Good Luck and God Bless
568849
no idea,\n\nbut my chimp is a reincarnation with king kong.