you know the would you rather game, well, would you rather get aids or get pregnant?
99109
Well yeah, neither is really desirable.  But AIDS is fatal... and pregnancy?  Temporary.  So I'd go with pregnancy, myself.
124479
get her pregnant or get a cow...
288232
That would not really be a preference. If you don't eat your body would die. If you did not have sex it would not kill you but you might eventually kill yourself.
1087543
Unless you want the possibility of fathering a child or catching an STD, i'd have to say no.
521029
tough choice\nbut i'd prefer to have a herpes rather than being sitted and talked for hours by that ego-maniac dr. phil =)\ni would kill myself if i directly heard him called himself 'dr. phil'
504791
how big of a bet?  and are the payee's good for the money?\n\nif i was already dying of something, then maybe.  i mean you dont die of aids in a week, so if i had only a few months to live, id spend as much money doing all the great stuff i wanted.\n\nplus id bang millions of prostitutes and give them aids, and hopefully wipe out the whole Vice sector of america
208799
let me find a place to gag. Orgasm full of germs and virus. Intercourse is enough
100087
I wish it would be adoption instead of abortion....You could be killing the one person who has the cure for canser
39908
No. You could become pregnant, and you have no protection agains diseases.
1122435
Yes, Not having a condom can lead to pregnancy, STD & or even AIDS....
539961
Make sex last longer or your period last longer? Either way the answer is NO.
735822
you may as well drain a river with a straw\n\ngo teach birth control instead
1108547
Neither-I would be unmarried if those are my choices. I want an honest and good man-and I got mine. If their not honest-it will show in other things-no matter how hard working they are. Would you want Cancer or Aids?
1020261
Anal sex  still has the highest probability of transmitting aids and your chances are 100% if you  have this type of sex with an infected partner.  Vaginal sex would come in second and is also a one shot deal if your are engaging in the behavior unprotected with an infected partner.  Oral sex is not much better.  Just be careful who you choose to share your body with and don't be afraid to require they get tested for HIV and show you proof before you engage in any type of sexual act.  A partner who is put offf by that kind of request in this day and age is not a partner you should want to be with in the first place.
944819
Neither one is 100% guaranteed, so if you are going to be having sex and don't want to get pregnant, it would be a good idea to use both!
767765
in the bed yeah as long as u dnt have hiv or add
480160
No way.  I would have the baby.  The percentage of babies being born with HIV to HIV positive mothers has gotten so small.  With proper treatment you can be assured that your baby would most likely not be born HIV positive.  The interesting thing is that in Africa there were mothers that were HIV positive and not knowing this breast fed their babies and then passed the HIV virus on to their babies.  Of course most people would agree that breast milk is best, and in some third world countries this is the only choice they have.  But with the growing number of African people getting aids more international groups are trying to educate, test, and pass out condoms to many groups.  Here in the united states we have the information right at hand to educate ourselves about aids (Internet, doctors, health clinics) but  people in other countries are just starting to understand what the AIDS thing is all about.  If you are in fact pregnant, and this question is not a hypothetical one, then I think you should def. talk to someone about HIV and what the options are for your unborn child.  If you decide to have the baby, and for reasons of your own do not want to keep it, adoption is a great thing to do.  I have two children, but given the chance I would adopt in a heartbeat.  I will keep you, hypothetical question or not in my prayers.