From ehich web-site, i can know more & more about universe?
107018
i think www.wikipedia.org is the best source of free information.......EVER!! its a free encyclopedia. if you havent heard about it or visited it, give it a shot......I am sure you'll love the amount of information they have.
80584
This question is completely confused. I have attached a web site about the big bang you might find useful.
612963
~Yes.  You can search the web.
1124031
Nasa's site definatelly. you can have full studies in Astronomy:) and... I consider the APOD....(Astronomy Picture Of the Day)\nOne picture for everyday since 1995......with full explanation and many links....
709963
They have a good website with interesting information. I think they explain everything.
582554
"...that I can find stuff about that?"
156513
http://theory.uwinnipeg.ca/physics/
144465
You can get more information regarding to web site at http://www.doinfinity.com
610596
I got a heavenly call: Meet me Beyond the universe.How to find my way?Universe?\nYes,not only aliens ,I believe in other universe and planning to visit soon.Will you give a company?
408399
Best damn site period.  I use it all the time.\n\n\nhttp://www.advancedphysics.org/
1158198
Some more info and I could find out
8131
no i dont think so. i think is a bunch of hooey. and it also depends on what you believe. how was the universe formed. if you know that you can take that and use it to see what you think about it
47001
Other pages in this Astrophysics/Cosmology section are: \n\nGravitational Entropy (June '98) \nA Debate on Open Inflation (November '98). The lecture is saved as a postscript document. \nQuantum Cosmology, M-theory and the Anthropic Principle (January '99). \nRotation, Nut Charge and Anti de Sitter Space (February '99). \nLinks \n\nHome \n--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nPhysics Colloquiums - Inflation: An Open and Shut Case (April '98).\nSlides and audio for this talk can be downloaded from the ITP at UCSB.\n\nThis talk will be based on joint work with Neil Turok, at Cambridge. Neil has always been interested in what might be called, alternative cosmology. He pushed the idea that topological defects like cosmic strings or textures, were the origin of the large scale structure of the universe. And he was a proponent of what is called, open inflation. This is the idea that the universe is infinitely large, and of low density, despite having been through a period of exponential expansion, in the very early stages. My opinion was, that these were all nice ideas, but that nature probably hadn't chosen the use any of them. I included open inflation in that list, because I believed strongly that the universe came into being, at a finite size, and I felt that implied that the universe now, was still of finite size, or closed. However, after Neil gave a seminar on open inflation in Cambridge, we got talking. We realized it was possible for the universe to come into existence, at a finite size, but nevertheless, be either a finite, or an infinitely large universe now. My talk will be about this idea, and new developments that have occur since then. One of these, which is so recent that it is not yet fully worked out, is that it seems there is an observational signature, of the kind of inflation Neil and I are proposing. The present measurements are not sensitive enough to see this effect, but it should be possible to test for it, in the observations the Planck satellite will make.\n\nAnother recent development, is that observations of supernovas, have suggested that the universe may have a small cosmological constant, at the present time. Even before these observations, Neil and I had realized that if there was a four form gauge field, one could invoke anthropic arguments to make it cancel the cosmological constant, that one would expect from symmetry breaking. But the anthropic argument would not require it to cancel exactly. So there could be a small residual cosmological constant. This is exciting. I shall describe the observational evidence later.\n\nAs you probably know, the universe is remarkably isotropic on a large scale. That is to say, it looks the same in all directions, if one goes beyond such local irregularities as the Milky Way, and the Local Group of galaxies. By far the most accurate measurement of the isotropy of the universe, is the faint background of microwave radiation, first discovered in 1965. At the present time at least, the universe is transparant to microwaves, in directions out of the plane of our galaxy. Thus the microwave background, must have propagated to us, from distances of the order of the Hubble radius, or greater. It should therefore give a sensitive measurement, of any anisotropy in the universe.\n\nThe remarkable fact is, that the microwave background is the same in every direction, to a high degree of accuracy. It wasn't until 1982, that differences between different directions were detected, at the level of one part in a thousand, with a dipole pattern on the sky. However, this could be interpreted as a consequence of our galaxy's motion through the universe, which blue shifted the microwave radiation in one direction, and red shifted it in the opposite direction. It need not represent any intrinsic anisotropy in the universe.\n\nIt was not until 1992, that tiny fluctuations on angular scales of 10 degrees, were
559307
Check the following links, they'll answer a lot of your questions, especially those related to Hubble, the big bang and time.\n\nFollow the links in the stories for addl. info.
44126
They do have a website. Check it out
955748
It depends on what info you want. Send any questions you have to me at stargategod420@yahoo.com. Depending on what you may or may not get an answer.
500778
you may find this site informative