"What the bleep do we know?" Any ideas about that movie?
114533
I'm glad you found the ideas in this movie interesting.  I hope you make an attempt to find out more, and especially, more true ideas.  The movie is full of lies, and half-truths, and self-delusions.  I found it offensive.\n\nThe blonde woman is J.Z. Knight, who "channels a spirit" named Ramtha.  She may have started out sincerely many years ago, but she is a con artist now.\n\nAll the wisest sages agree that silly people (sometimes called "beginner's mind") are more likely to see the truth than those of us who think we know a lot, and think we are very smart.
338934
Then what movie is it?
357164
You probably should see it .\n\nSo when the sequel comes out you'll know what's going on.\n\nThe Sequel.........????\nReach around Ridge
808488
funny how 2 hours have passed and no one has commented....\nwell i'm just going to watch it right now....\ni believe every one must see this movie....its shows what alot of us don't want to believe is true
843481
From the movie Life.\n\nRay: "You [bleep] around with me, there's gonna be consequences and repercussions."
868936
seen this before, very good\n\ni wont tell cos it will spoil it for the rest
165305
Haven't you ever seen the movie? It is AWESOME! I think you should see it! I can't tell you or it would ruin it for you when you watch it!   HOPE IT'S NOT DUE TOMORROW!
1045939
is that "whitenoise"\ndunno, watch the movie
300008
I think that the whole thing was a dream the guy had while he was dying.  The movie you saw was what was goingon in his head, a dream world he had made up..  At the very end he realized it.  The dream had people in it that were surrounding him as the accident took place.  The poeple who were the most prominent in the movie were those who were around him the most after the accident.\n\nIt was a bit confusing though - I just watched it last night.
896683
I, too, felt a bit confused when I left the theatre. But after I took some time to think about it, I began to understand it better. I am by no means saying I understand it fully now, but here's my current take on the film:\n\nThis film cannot be taken literally, and Darren Aronofsky did not intend for there to be a lot of simple, straightforward, closed answers. Several parts are there for the audience members to make his/her own conclusions.\n\nI think that the only real timeline in the story is the present day one. The other two are Tommy's thoughts/fantasies as ways to deal with Izzi's nearing death. The 16th century timeline can be viewed as Izzi's book, or Tommy's fantasy of himself on a quest for immortality, or both. The 26th century timeline can be viewed as another of Tommy's fantasies of himself searching for immortality. He imagines himself bringing the Tree of Life to the Mayans' Underworld so Izzi can be alive again. The 16th century timeline is more simple fantasy, while in the 26th century timeline he also sorts out his thoughts and fears. It is in this timeline, or during these thoughts, that Tommy comes to terms with death, thus setting in motion the last 5-10 minutes of the film in which he "finishes it": he finishes Izzi's 16th century story as well as the other two timelines in a way that he accepts death and discovers rebirth.\n\nMy take on the Mayan's First Father reference (First Father being the person Izzi pointed out to Tommy in the museum) is that the First Father understood death and rebirth, even if Thomas (the 16th century Hugh Jackman) didn't. The result is Thomas being unable to use the Tree's sap to live forever--because immortality is not meant to be-- and the rebirth is symbolized in his sprouting flowers. The understanding of death and rebirth is shown in Tom-- a character who is separate and yet the same person as Tommy and Thomas-- when he nears the dying star: the tree flowers to life and dying, self-sacrificing Tom is shown with back arched, limbs outward in the same position as the First Father in the museum.\n\nBut even all that is taking the film too literally. I came to understand all this after the film was over, and yet, while I was watching the film, the most important element of the film still came through: the themes of love, life, death, and rebirth, and the message that we must accept these these things. Tommy could not accept death, and yet Izzi neared death with such grace. But finally Tommy, visiting Izzi's grave with a smile on his face, accepted death. For me, this all came though while I was watching the film, and that turned out to still be the most important part once I fit together some of the details.\n\nPlus, confusing plot aside, the film was absolutely beautiful. The cinematography was amazing, the acting-- especially Hugh Jackman's-- was superb, and the music was beautiful. Despite the seemingly incoherency of the film, it was gorgeous, and I believe that several aspects of it deserve an Oscar nod.\n\nI still feel that I would have cut the film a little differently to make it more clear that the future and past timelines are Tommy's fantasies such that the film begins with the present, not the past, and such that each part of his fantasy correlates more to what he just previously experienced in the present. Despite that, I still think Aronofsky put it all together to make it work if the audience is willing to think a bit. "The Fountain" is a beautiful, profound, and momentous film.
861360
Watch the movie, you might learn something.
905150
i think we're both looking for the same film.\n\nis it a bit christmassy and has silent night at the end when she 'wakes up'?\nand there is a big bubbling clay pit on her adventures?\n\ni have been looking for this for months but can't find anything. people always say labyrinth....\n\nmaybe this small bit of info will jog someone's memory.... please......
478034
The movie is called "Sleepers".  I just finished reading the book a few months ago.
498000
The movie is nothing more than religious propaganda, and not as ineteresting as propaganda like "Passion of the Christ".  \n\nThe movie was pseudoscientific crap, full of deliberate lies and urban myths.\n\nThe scientists who appearded were all outraged at the way they were presented in that movie.\n\nBy all means watch it, but be aware that it is just a work of fiction intended to gain converts to a religion. Almost nothing they say is true or accurate.
839949
I just got that movie lastnight!!lol.I havent watched it yet.When I do I will let you know.
1155103
I have a link here to the movie's homepage. You should be able to find all the info you need from there.
676004
Oh i luved that movie... I think it said like "what the hell is wrong with me?" or something like that.... I wasnt so sure either but it had to do with that i think