What are u thinking about the future situation of Iran's nuclear file??
105575
I THINK THAT YOUR COUNTRY'S DIRECTION IN THE NUCLEAR AGE IS DEPENDANT ON HOW THE PROGRAM IS BASED AND IMPLIMENTED. HOW IT CAN BE GUIDED AND MONITORED FOR SAFETY VIOLATION'S AND UPGRADES. I DO NOT WANT FOR YOUR COUNTRY TO GET UPSET AT CURRENT EVENT'S AND STRIKE ONE OF IT'S ENEMY'S WITH A NUCLEAR WEAPON JUST BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE CAPABILITY.
226396
Iran has announced that they are going to open an oil market that opperates on the Euro.  That's bad for America because the US dollar is currently the primary currency for international oil trade.  So the United States has announced that Iran plans to have nuclear weapons.  How convenient.\n\ntaz: That's exactly what the US government wants you to think.  It's called propaganda.  Keep in mind that eveything that government agencies say they say for a reason.  They rarely just tell the straight out truth, and the current administration has a particularly notable history of lying.  You should always think about why they're saying what they're saying.
409665
A worst case scenario would unroll if the US were to launch a major air strike against Iranian nuclear facilities in the next few months.  A limited air strike against a "choke point", such as the Iranian uranium conversion facility at Isfahan, would like disrupt Iran's nuclear program for a long time.  The problem is what happens then?\n\nIran will respon in some way, all of which are devastatint to regional and international security.  They could lob scuds at Israel and US bases in the region.\n\nThe could block the Strait of Hormuz, cutting off the oil pipeline.\n\nThey could stop selling oil.\n\nThey could use their connections with Hezbullah to launch terrorist strikes against US interest.\n\nThey could do all or any of the above in combination. The only feasible targeting of a US nuclear attack would be the hardened facility at Natanz, under 75 ft of hard rock.  The other nuclear facilities are soft targets and can be taken out by conventional weapons.\n\nWhatever course the US takes, be prepared for the UNIMAGINABLE>
336555
Being that i think that Iran is being fueled by satan, i believe that they will continue to rant and rave, and pretend to be powerful when they are weak, and will build their terrorist army, and their bombs, and do all they can to destroy Israel.  I believe that unless the world does something to stop this it will continue.  I believe that in any eventuality it will not be an end to terrorism or the jihad against Israel.  Remember the muslim state of Pakistan is already a nuclear state, and they too have terrorists. Iraq is in Chaos and unstable, what leaders that will generate is yet to be seen.  Iran is a threat to the region but not as much to the US except by economic means of crude oil control.  Unless there is a change of heart in the minds and hearts of the muslim people the problem will cascade into nuclear terrorism, probably sooner than many think.  \n\n-LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF
125188
It's delicate. My guess is that Iran will take Russia's offer for enrichment at least for now. I'm quite sure their research will go on, which means sooner or later someone's gonna call their bluff and then it won't matter whether they've been onest about the purpose of their program.\nThe sad thing is Iran still has the NPT and international law on it's side since none of the accusers managed to prove its program is -not- entirely civilian. \nWar right now would be damn inconvenient for US since to most neutral countries it will appear and incessant bullying and some might rally behind Iran, Syria and Venezuela.\nUS can't exploit Iraq oil just yet. Of course US companies will be preffered for drilling and/or refining Iraq oil but they have to wait for the situation in Iraq and give the appearance of elections.
650869
Somebody will as the world's existance could easily be at stake. If Iran develops nukes it almost assures WW III will come about inside a decade of them aquiring Nukes. If somebody dosen't all that stood by signs a death warrent for the world.
62839
I'm not going to turn this into an anti or pro Bush diatribe (personally, I'm indifferent to him), but the Iran situation is indeed very serious, and it is not just Bush that thinks so.  France, Germany and Britain have been working on this for many years.  China and Russia are stake holders.  Even the Australia Group has issued an opinion.  What you're observing is simply more attention being paid to the matter by the media (don't forget the European Union has been working on this seriously since at least 2000, even before September 11).  Iran clearly wants nuclear weapons and has made overt threats to use them, which escalates the situation above a mere arms race.  Further, Iran has not been transparent with the program, which is a direct violation of an international treaty which the country signed on its own accord.  However, when the EU-3 first noticed that Iran had broken the treaty and bought the issue to international attention, the Iranians suddenly became indignant -- essentially casting asside an agreeement they had made with civilized society.   However, now the attention of the world's citizens is on Iran, I hope that the same level heads that have been working 'behind the scenes' continue to prevail.
638789
now .. haven't you opened a can of worms ?!?!?!?\nit is a tough one, mainly because NO ONE can say whether or not there's actually a military (bomb-making) aspect to the "nuclear ambition". \nConstruction of the nuclear power plants in Iran started many years ago, long before the mullahs came to power ... so it's not as if this is something new that the current regime has suddenly come up with. In that sense, and since there is no "proof" of any malicious ;) activity, I personally don't see why not complete power plants on which millions and millions have been spent already. But then again : is there an atomic bomb hiding behind the facade? I don't know ... you don't know ... Bush doesn't know ... the IAEA doesn't know. To be fair, I would say all "countries" are "innocent" unless PROVEN otherwise.
1109348
Actually pretty soon if we don't handle those deceitful Iranians! If we let them get a nuclear weapon, they WILL use it on Israel. Since 1949 Israel has been a sovereign nation, the Lord Jesus christ said that once this happened, he would never let the world push the Israelies out of their promised land again. Thats why if we don't deal with Iran, the day of the rapture will appear. So look busy, cause GOD is coming. The Russians who have been helping numerous terrorist states for the last 30 years will join with Iran when they do decide to attack Israel. This is the Army of the North God warns us about!
586798
Iran's president IS nuts, basically. He's spouting nonsense for internal consumption and hasn't completely understood yet that the international media picks it up and runs with it. Iran may or may not really be nuclear capable, but the ayatollahs who really run the country want their populace to think so. In any case, don't bomb them...yet.
145148
I think so. Iran is wanting nuclear weapons. They should live under the same rules as everyone else.
56062
Be real.  It's not just the US concerned about it, it's pretty much the rest of the world.  Iran cannot be trusted with it and that's that, their government is always unstable and you don't know who'll be controlling the nukes next year.
335658
might be iran next year
600018
your question for iran was veary rod you ........\nmaby i dont now about iran but that waas a rod question
898713
I hadn't thought about this suggestion before. I think it does leave us in a position to monitor them but stay on their good side, which is key. We don't need to make the situation worse, for sure. Do you think Iran would be open to that? If they weren't, is that sign to the UN that their intentions are malicious?
379646
So far only limited information is available, only from what was release to the press by the Iranian.\n\nJuLy 7, 2003, BBC news "Iran missile test alarms Israel" http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3051418.stm\n\nIran Missile Milestones - 1985-2000; http://www.wisconsinproject.org/countries/iran/miss-miles.htm\n\nAnalysis: Iran's Missile Capabilities; http://www.spacedaily.com/news/missiles-04zzl.html\n\nApril 08, 2006 Iran missile threat could harm US; http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060408/OPINION02/604080351/1009/OPINION\n\nCNN, April 05,  Iran says another 'top secret' missile tested; http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/04/05/iran.missile.ap/\n\nUpdate 2: Iran Test-Fires 'Top Secret' Missile ; http://www.forbes.com/business/businesstech/feeds/ap/2006/04/05/ap2649634.html\n\nAt this point, we may say that its nothing, but dont forget the fact that Iran fired a Silkworm missile (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silkworm_missile) in 1988 that hit US Tanker (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Earnest_Will)\n\nEven after that, Iran continue to develop and improve its missile technology, courtesy of teh Chinese.\n\nLast week missile test by the Iranian shows that the missile can deliver multi payload, it is also a well known fact that Iran despise the Jews.\n\nHow soon and how fast can Iran develop a cruise missile? its only a matter of time.
656776
I say that you are crazy.  Iran cannot have nukes, no if's, and's, or but's about it.  They have vowed to wipe Israel off the map, and a nuke would give them the means to do it, and permanently.  A weapon that deadly in the hands of insanity is just that- insanity.