Who comes off as more intelligent : Bush or Benito Mussolini  ? Both seemed good at starting colonial wars.?
105084
Well Bush is an elected representative of the people of the United States of America.Mussolini on the other hand was a fasscist dictator,who topelled the king of Italy and took power over Italy and all its colonial pocessions.\nBush is a servant of the pople of the US,as stated by the constitution.I dont justify his actions,yet Mussolini was far worse.\nOn the positive note,Mussolini was'nt much of a leader,he could'nt win one single war without the help of the Germans,atleast Bush kicked ass in Afghanistan and Iraq.\nBush is not fasscist,i think the stress of political power and financial gains ware his mind down,i dont know if he's someone's pawn.But Mussolini certainly was one.\nI think Bush comes first then Benito Mussolini.
613883
In many, many ways can the "leadership" style of Dubya be compared to Adolph Hitler. Both are facists. Both are arrogant and live in worlds of altered reality. Both are anti-diversity and both are considered by most of the rest of the world to practice hegemony. Although Hitler committed suicide as his end, I believe Bush, Jr. will live out the rest of his days (daze) at his ranch in Crawford, Texas as a virtual pariah.
1025286
I don't think it was Mussolini, but then again because of him, so many Italian mafiosi fled to America. I would have to say Mario Puzo, and the reason for that is his book and movie "The Godfather." They were kind of like a guide to being a mobster. Its kind of funny because even though what happened in the book and movie would never happen in real life, mobsters would try to copy the images in "The Godfather", which in turn made Hollywood copy from the mobsters.
197538
Pulmonaryft- Bush is not like Hitler and your dumb as a brick. \n\n\nAnd yes, Hitler was a socialist.
1230
Hitler would win because Hitler is tough and mean and Bush is a great big panty-waste.
922850
Well once Bush starts exterminating Jews I might get behind the idiotic comparision you are trying to draw between Bush and Hitler. Until then you just sound stupid.
71380
Probably George Washington.  He inhereted a country that was pretty much going to Hell in a handbasket and set it on the path to become what would become arguably the greatest country in the history of mankind.  I don't think George Bush, Bill Clinton or George Bush Sr. should be listed as answers here because insufficient time has really passed for their legacies (and the full consequences of their decisions) to be assessed.
1003501
Candidate C sounds like Adolph Hitler.  I think A might be Churchill.  B, I'm not too sure.\nPersonally, I would wonder about the democratic processes in this country.
654220
saddam was a dictator..but bush s a president of the us,leader of democracy and peace..then i should say bush..cause at least saddam never say i wanna giv world peace..but bush always say this!and hes peace is afganistan,iraq,abu ghraib,guantanamo,supporting israel,threat iran and...
440873
I think you guys have stumbled on to something: Condolezza is Vader, and Bush is the Emperor. Brilliant!!!
338487
USA No 1!!! U.S.A, U.S.A!!! Yeeeaaahh!! Whooo!!\n\nWhat's an "italy" or a "portugal"? I know what an "england" is, that's something you tie on a lead and drag into warzones so that you're not in it on your own.\n\nBrad Friedel Brian Mcride for president of UK and Brian Mcride for UK first lady!!!!
1035336
hugo chavez\n\n-- he manages to drive bush crazy
550855
Most wars involve some variation of "I WANT what you have and I think I can get away with TAKING it" which is Imperialism. \n\nNationalism is the spin-doctoring brow-beating that ENABLES Imperialism\n\nNow do your OWN research for your take-home essay question as to WHY Hitler, Hirohito, Stalin, Mussolini, Churchill, Roosevelt (and the people who put them in power) roll the dice with OUR lives.
879344
Really, Bush worse than Kim Jong Il?\n\nThat's a little surprising to me. But then, I see questions on this board every day comparing him to Hitler, Mussolini, and Bin Laden.\n\nIt's a shame so many other countries have this perception of us as hateful, ignorant, abrasive, rude people. We're really not. \n\nAnd comparing Bush to Kim Jong Il or Hitler is really, really absurd, no matter how much you dislike the man or disagree with his policies.
880211
P. Bush is Ddubbyas grandpa.  He was the Bush who funded Adolph Hitler and even got profits from Jewish slave labor in the camps before FDR shut him down with a special act of Congress called the Trading With The Enemies Law in 1942.  Not many like him after they find out what he was doing.
352494
The buffoon did indeed go to Yale, but it's worth noting that he was a legacy; they had to let him in.\n\nAs for his misuse/abuse of the English language, my favorite Bushism thus far is as follows:  \n\n"Too many good docs are getting out of the business. Too many OB/GYN's aren't able to practice their love with women all across the country."\n\nThis is our leader, folks.  His speeches embarras me; his actions frighten me.  And, for the record, as a good American, I have a right to say that.  Just ask Teddy Roosevelt:\n\n"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
147243
I think an interesting comparison - in the spirit of Hitler vs. Saddam; would be comparing Neville Chamberlain and Bill Clinton. \n\nChamberlain was the English Prime Minister before Churchhill in WW2, who proclaimed "peace in our time" when he negotiated with Hitler - right before Hitler invaded Poland. He was trying to appease Hitler - believing that they would be able to "talk out" germany's aggression. \n\nClinton - much in the same spirit - tried to take the same approach to the middle east and Saddam Hussein after the Gulf War. \n\nNeither approach was ultimately successful, and ended up costing more war and ending more lives in the end.