have scientists created a missing link in the lab?
100961
There was a chimp named Oliver who many people believed to be a human/chimp hybrid.  He walked upright and had a very "human" looking face, among other attributes.  He appeared on many TV shows.  However, it was determined that he was indeed a chimpanzee because he had 48 chromosomes.
214525
Not yet, but that is the hope for the future. We hope to be able to create nano robots than can go in and repair our cells at the molecular level
854257
A theory COULD be true even if the experiment to prove it was flawed.  It simply isn't PROVED to be true until an UNflawed experiment proves it.
571244
I work at a blood bank and I have never seen anything get past our lab it is possible but rare. Most hospitals make sure that the centers that they receive blood from has excellent track records.
167683
i wish there is! people area getting it so much! and if there isn't, come on scientist adn make it!
121035
This is a difficult question to answer. There are fossil gaps, and gaps in our understanding of human evolution. But no one "missing link", especially one that we have a picture of. This is the fantasy of the media.
736965
This might help a little with the DNA part.
636455
To be sure, the theory has a lot of gaps.  So it's not a Law.  All's it takes is one scientifically provable discovery that doesn't fit the theory to launch a search for a new theory that will explain the new information while keeping the old proven stuff too.  A good example is Einstein's Theory of Relativity.  Newtonian Mechanics fails at extreme sizes and speeds.  Relativity so far has been able to explain all the variances found to date at those extremes, but has not been proven to be 100% valid all the time, so it's not a law yet.  If you can discover something that invalidates evolutionary theory, you'll probably win a Nobel Prize!
72303
The short answer is no. \n\nIn science, it is important that results be repeatable. This is especially true when dealing with some phenomenon like cold fusion which appears to violate all the principles that we understand. \n\nPons and Fleishman and others tried to reproduce the observations, and were unable to do so reliably. A recent review by the Department of Energy of 15 years of research and efforts in the field reached the conclusion that this phenomenon does not exist, or at least cannot be verified.
288762
Kary Mullis came up with the idea of PCR in the '80s.  It became experiementally viable at Cetus, a biotech company.  Videos about the history are available from the Smithsonian.
842928
base on theory, yes. but practicaly, the problem is the sample of DNA, there is complete DNA code or not.
356386
Watson and Crick discovered it while researching "genetic material." For further information, check this site.
862225
Not in the least! It's pseudoscience which has failed every test put to it. The fact that so many people believe in it doesn't mean it's true; what it does indicate is the miserable failure of science education around the world.
961312
Well, that is the Holy Grail of biochemistry and we've been dreaming of that ever since Dr. Pauling had me researching metabolic diseases, Lesch-Nyhan syndrome in particular.  The problem has been 1) finding the precise genetic coding of the fouled up part of the DNA and 2) devising a mechanism to clip out that nucleic base and replace it with the correct one (or series of bases).  Precision is, of course, vital or you'll kill the experimental animal (or, ultimately, human patient).
324337
Not yet - that's what scientists are trying to determine.....
510606
Yes you are correct about the unknown Indian bit!! I haven't heard about either him or the experiment, and I haven't found any one else that has, but I think my 'teleportation' gear is playing up a bit, I'll get it re-tuned and try again later!! I thought teleportation was a means of transferring physical matter almost instantly? Not brain waves!!\nAre you sure your brain waves haven't been transfered??
29764
None really - science is a methodology.  The scientists might have faith in all sorts of things -but science itself does not.