What is a quark?  Does it spread well on a cracker?
107322
Quarks are the basic building blocks of some other sub-atomic particles, like the proton. Quarks, unlike other particles, can not be divided.\n\nQuarks are best on crackers with just a dab of peanut butter.
303179
A quantum computer requires entangling quarks. To make an effective machine, you need hundreds of simultaneously entangled quarks. They would need to be stable, and hidden from view of any reading machine - if viewed, the quarks (due to quantum decoherence) would take on either a 0 or a 1, and the computer would fail.\n\nHowever, if you do it, you'll:\n\n1) be richer than your wildest dreams could ponder\n\n2) have caused a global security crisis, because every modern encription system could easily be solved by your computer, giving you access to practically everything on the internet.\n\nGood Luck!
846014
Cracker (sometimes "white cracker") is a pejorative term for a white person, mainly used in the Southern United States.\n\nCheck this out for the full run-down.\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cracker_%28pejorative%29
473847
Charm quarks were first seen, and are most commonly observed, in the production of the J / psi particle, which is the lowest mass bound state of charmonium (a c/anti-c quark combination).  As with any quark, you'll never see one unbound (for reasons I won't go into here).\n\nIf by 'seen' you mean 'observed', then the above particle was first seen in a particle chamber at SLAC and at Brookhaven - and any observation which provides information about quark composition of particles will also take place in a particle chamber of some kind, as only they are capable of tracking particle motion - and it is the specific forms of particle tracks which allow us to identify quark composition.
221344
Does anybody have a peanut?
353950
they managed to combine friggen salt, butter, cheese, and mild amounts of grease into an attractive cracker.\nplus the boxes are huge. who would buy a wimpy mini bag?
196097
Of course weight, age and motility - for the cat - and bread/butter thickness ratio, even-ness and %age totality of spread covering all have to be factored into the determining equation.  \n\nIf we assume that these elements cancel each other out - perhaps the cat and the toast land side on?
401330
Quarks are fundamental subatomic particles. Your and my school physics probably stopped at electrons protons and neutrons, but leptons and quarks are now widely regarded as "more fundamental" i.e. the building blocks out of which protons and electrons and neutrons (known collectively as hadrons) are built.\n\nAs you might expect if there is a top quark, there is a bottom quark, too. In fact there are six types of quark in all. With various properties ...\n\nEach quark is assigned a baryon number, B  =  1/3, and a vanishing lepton number L  =  0. They have fractional electric charge, Q, either Q  =  +2/3 or Q  =  −1/3. The former are called up-type quarks, the latter, down-type quarks. \n\nEach quark is assigned a weak isospin: Tz  =  +1/2 for an up-type quark and Tz  =  −1/2 for a down-type quark. Each doublet of weak isospin defines a generation of quarks. There are three generations, and hence six flavours of quarks — the up-type quark flavours are up, charm and top; the down-type quark flavours are down, strange, and bottom (each list is in the order of increasing mass).\n\nThe fractional electric charges are worth a comment.\n\nAs you know electrons have a charge of -1 and protons a charge of + 1. This means that electrons contain three quarks with Q = -1/3 and protons contain three quarks, two of them having Q = +2/3 and one of them having Q - -1/3. And neutrons (charge 0) contain 3 quarks, one of them having Q = +2/3, and two of them having Q = -1/3\n\nQuarks are not seen in isolation as separate entities, they are contained within (or "confined" to) the hadrons of which they are part.
1099277
Ok, this may take some time.  Let's go back and review.  In the beginning of the scientific universe, there were large areas of gas and matter kinda drifting around.  As these clumps started to collide and grow larger, the core area began to become more and more dense.  When these areas finally collapsed, they created black holes and quasars around these black holes.  These black holes fed on their quasars like a huge vacuum machine.  This suction led to an acceleration of particles in a circular fashion.  This continued until the black hole completely consumed the quasar.  When the quasar was gone, the black hole was unable to feed on local matter anymore.  The circulation, however, is still going.  This circulation compresses and glows brighter, obscuring the black hole from view.  When some particles in this compressed disk reach the force needed to escape the gravitational pull of other objects it shoots out at near the speed of light.  Imagine it this way . . . you have a pillow case and in this pillow case is a toaster, an object of mass.  You start spinning this toaster and pillow case over your head.  Your hands and the foce you're using to swing the pillow case and toaster are similar to the forces of the black hole and the pillow is acting as the hole's quasar.  When you release the pillow, you have demonstrated the black hole's consumption of the quasar.  For a period of time (remember scale here) the toaster will stay in orbit around you.  On earth, it's a fraction of a second and a short distance, but in the big picture, its billions of years and in terms of lightyears.  When the toaster finally leaves orbit, it and some of the matter that's attached to it will leave at a high rate of acceleration.  That's why.  Even though the force of the black hole is powerful enough to suck it in, the rotational force and the object's distance from the black hole are enough to keep it from being drawn into the black hole.  I hope this helps.
1160608
Protons are composed of quarks, the smallest currently know material of the universe. Quarks have a + or a - (positive or negative) charge and it is when they are added that it creates a magnetic property. For example, protons are made of 3 quarks, 2 positive, 1 negative thus summing up to a charge of +1.
556056
We dont know, but to the best of our knowledge, matter is composed of atoms composed of protons, neutrons, and electrons.  Protons and neutrons are composed of hadrons which are composed of quarks (electrons are quarks).\n\nQuarks may be composed of strings, which are 1 dimensional particles, but we cant really say.  Thats our best theory.\n\nSome people believe strings are the absolute smallest things out there.  In fact, at the 'size' of strings, distance and size dosent really make sense, so if they exist they are proably as small as anything else.  That is not to say that they are not composed of more fundamental things, whatever they might be.  It is to say that size dosent make much sense beyond strings, so they can be called the smallest.\n\nEnjoy.
94713
As far as we know, quarks are elementary particles (meaning they are not made up of anything else).\n\nQuarks were formed at the beginning of the universe, but new ones are also formed all the time.  \n\nIn high-energy collisions quarks can be created.  At Fermilab, protons are collided with anti-protons each with about 1000 GeV of energy, and hundreds of quarks can be created in each collision.  A radiated gluon, for example, can hadronize into many particles made of quarks.
820460
what a cracker 10/10 brilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll and fabbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
34976
I can roll my tongue. So it looks like there's a small piece of lunch meat sticking out of your mouth? I don't know the ratio of people who can do this to people who can't, but yeah, I can. o_O
606473
Quite frankly, we don't know. Like listed above, there is a variety of smaller particles that we have been able to smash an atom into. However, each time we build a bigger smasher, we get new particles. The thought is that there is a fundamental particle that is no longer divisible, but I don't think science has commited to it yet.
522711
I wanted to say that Quark stars are the stars in the constellation of Donald the Duck, but I really don't know what quark stars are.\n\nMaybe they are stars made up of the subatomic quark particle, just as a neutron star is made up of neutrons.
62050
If you're not good at this program, it's complicated.\nHowever, i would recommend you Quark Xpress, it's a great program designed especially for these issues.