Is vulgarity a problem for the brutish or the prudish?
106856
It's a problem for those who umm...don't like it? You don't have to be a prude to think that cursing and vulgar actions are inappropriate. For me it just depends on my mood.
1029979
I think cursing & nudity/gratuitous sex could be left out of movies completely & not be missed at all. If the writers can't come up with a more intelligent way for the actors to speak, then they need to go back to school & learn grammar & English all over again. It's not necessary to cuss to make your point. As far as the sex goes, same thing - most of the time it's not germane to the plot & if the movies got better ratings (PG versus R) more people could see the film.
1041255
I don't mind girls who "talks" as much as I mind a girl with horrible grammar. I don't think it's "importent" but rather I think it's "important" to know about the real issues that bother (not bothers) her.
718413
perspective?\n\n      Obviously so. \n\n      Profane strictly speaking means disrespectful toward the sacred.\n\n      Obscene? \n      Some words for body parts, sexual activities, excretory functions and material are considered vulgar, and inappropriate for polite conversation.\n\n      Some words are filtered instantly. I wasn't allowed to say: don't be a pussy  (p---y). But you will I think be allowed to say penis,in this context.\n\n      It must be that someone makes a complaint: re "community guidelines", and then the judgment is made to delete something.\n\n       People who want to be censors, would tend to be strict, uptight folks. \n\n       Just work around it, dude. You can write the first letter and then put blank spaces. \n\n       F--k off, censoring mother f----ers.
427711
Actually the swear words aren't the most offensive at all. \n\nWould you be more offended to be called n****r or c**t or a paedophile?  Or a child-murderer, or a racist, or a homophobe, or amoral.  There are many words worse than swear words that you can be called.
199570
The F word is Anglo Saxon.  Most others are corruptions of body parts.  My favourite is my old grandad's: 'Bad cess to you'.   It took me a long time to figure it out, but the cess is as in cesspit.
981018
both are nasty\n\n:> peace\n.
622015
he is refering to the sexual act ,or he could be swearing.it is one or the other
909944
i totally agree whats the point in being a lessa if you fancy a bit cock. Whats wrong with these women are fingers and tongues not enough now. I think there are alot of confused people in the world today.
374227
I think it is a bigger problem to be against sex !!  I mean, most of the problems in our society come from censorship and sexual repression.  I say, as long as you are safe and like it, more power to you, and the lucky man you are with !!\n\nJB
1129265
Partly good and partly bad.\nI learnt to type fast and improve my grammae skills (somehow), meet new & clean (not perverted friends) (I have a few friends whom I met years ago and we are still friends, HOW SWEET)\n\nA lot of perverts and I learnt  a lot of bad words from there. (but not using it)
718484
I prefer women that have little fat, and are not lacking in feminine curves. That is in part the result of my ideology, as I favor beauty over vulgarity. People (males and females alike) with little fat can have complex beautiful forms in their bodies, like architecture, whereas a big vulgar blob of fat can possess no such forms.
148592
Hygiene is always important. If a guy is nasty, I won't give him the time of day.
548349
Yes. Both are cursed by hisory to behave the way they behave. You may not like it, but you can not help it either.
420943
moon,\n\nIt's normal, babe.  Some are 'bubblegum pink', some are crimson, some purkle...all get a bit darker with progressing arousal.\n\nNothin' wrong wit' ya, sweetheart!\n\n\nRebecca,\n\nThere is nothing at all offensive in the way the question is written, nor does it contain vulgar language.\n\nIt's a legitimate question.  You do not have to respond, nor read the post in its entirety.  Do not force your morality onto others.
170130
Not really demeaning if you think about it.  Humans are, after all, animals.  And with all the possible positions to have sex, there are many that involve the woman on top if you prefer the dominant role in intercourse.  We figure you work all day, let us do the work while you women get a moment to enjoy it.  As far as the way you dress, even in the animal kingdom, the best display gets the attention, it's not demeaning, it's innate instinct from our feral human roots.
699650
Well Sophie.....I too have been wondering this. It seems like the more unintelligent, the more ludicrous. and the more raunchy an answer is the better it is liked. I will not lower my standards and give a smart A** comment just to make someone smile. I try to give information that is factual, honest and sensitive to the question that is being asked. I do not try to offend anyone with stupid of the wall sexual comments. Most people want to write something disgusting and sexually perverse.