Any papers on .NET vs J2EE technologies?
115033
http://www.theserverside.com/articles/article.tss?l=J2EE-vs-DOTNET\nhttp://www.gotdotnet.com/team/compare/\nhttp://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-03-2002/jw-0308-j2eenet.html\nhttp://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/java/compare/
358945
I am assuming that since you are asking about Java and C# that you are planning on doing some sore of web programming.  I am also assuming that since you are thinking about C# and web programming, you will be using the Microsoft C# Express Edition or the Visual Studio .NET 2003 or 2005 development environment.\n\nThis is a large, open-ended question and you need to ask yourself many things.  You need to decide who will be using your program.  Are you in a corporate environment that already has policies and frameworks in place for guidance?  If so, your decision ahs been made for you.  Do you need to interact with other applications?  If so, you may want to work in the same language.  Will it be a cross platform group; Sun. Linux, MAC?  Java would probably be a better choice.  Will all of the machines have .NET 1.1 or 2.0 on them?  If so, C# would be a good choice.  What do your peers or friends use?  IF you need help, can you easily get support for one over the other?\n\nOnce you have answered these questions, look at the language itself.  Will the language support what you are trying to do?  Are there things in Java that are not easily implemented in C#?  Are you going to tie this to a Microsoft SQL sever for backend data; go with C#.  Since Java runs in a sandbox, it MAY be more secure than C#.\n\nThis is only a partial list of questions I would ask myself when trying to decide what language to use for a given task.  At the corporate level, I would normally spend a day or two discussing requirement with the business owner and then determine how best to handle an assignment.\n\nGood Luck!
942557
http://www.iisjapan.com/about_iisj.html\n\nsee the link above
68219
Weblogic is the BEST, chk out:\n\nhttp://www.jguru.com/faq/view.jsp?EID=211362\n\n--\nBalakumar Muthu\nhttp://i5bala.blogspot.com
255775
For client/server work I use vb.net. For web work I use ColdFusion. They are both easy to learn and easy to use.
461934
Check your JAVA on your system.\nOr else download and reinstall it.\nwww.java.com\nDownload J2SE for your Operating System.\nIt may be Win XP, Win 2003.\nChoose it from Java's site and all you need is J2SE.\n\nEnjoy !!
842090
Depending on what language you are planning on writing the program with there are some solutions outhere. If you are planning on using .Net langauage you can use Visual Studio Express or if you are looking into java you can use Java SE. Both of these I believe should be free since the last time I checked.
974524
you need write code !!\n\nuse j2se and develop!!\njar and enjoy !\n\nit is not that easy !!
322721
There are a couple of Web sites out there which help cater to developers using .NET technologies.  GotDotNet is one such site which is also endorsed by Microsoft.  There is also CodeProject, which has several good sections, contributors, etc. for the .NET languages.\n\nI've included links to both below:
566663
Everything is hot! \n\nOpenScource Tools based on PHP/MySQL is the hottest one. Ofcourse MS .net is in the race along with Java. But the best thing to note is that all programming languages are in the bandwagon to integrate XML. \n\nCheers\nSathu
564243
How this even comes down to a dead heat is beyond me.\n\nIf you are going to code in ASP.NET 2.0, use Visual Web Developer Express. Otherwise, there's no contest: Dreamweaver is the vastly superior tool.
89049
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM August 1998/Vol. 41, No. 8 63\nNearly a decade of Workshops on Information Systems and Economics\n(WISE) have examined a wide range of research topics.\nThese include a number of what could be termed “demand-side” topics, which focus on the\neffective use of information technology, such as IT-induced changes to markets, and “supplyside”\ntopics, which focus on the efficient provision of IT resources. Software engineering economics\n(SEE) spans both groups, but it has generally been the most dominant topic within the supply\narea. While the economics of hardware have been relatively ignored in the management\nresearch literature, given industry’s ability to continually provide\nfaster, smaller hardware at ever-decreasing prices, software has been an\nentirely different matter. Software costs continue to be significant, and\nindustry’s understanding of how to reduce them has improved only very\nslowly in contrast to hardware. This dilemma has merited a significant\namount of research attention, and the consequent research findings tend to\nhave important practical applications.\nChris F. Kemerer\nProgress, Obstacles, and\nOpportunities in\nSoftware Engineering\nEconomics\nPressing demands from industry suggest more attention\nshould be focused on this critical area.\nA d v a n c e s i n S o f t w a r e E n g i n e e r i n g E c o n o m i c s\nAlso in contrast to some of the demand-related\ntopics, SEE research commonly has a significant\ntechnological component to it, since much of the\nresearch is focused on evaluating promising new\ntechnologies or approaches to software development.\nThis diverges with much demand-side work, which\ntends to be closer to traditional economics research.\nTherefore it requires some skills and knowledge of\nboth the software engineering and economics disciplines.\nAccordingly, it has also attracted some\nresearchers from the software engineering area\nwithin computer science, whose work will also be\nreflected in this review, and in the suggestions for\nfuture work. This combination of skill requirements\nalso tends to make research in this area comparatively\ndifficult, and suggests one reason why we\ndon’t see more research in this important area.\nPractitioners are most concerned about understanding\nwhat aspects of software engineering innovations\nhave worked best and whether they are\napplicable to their particular situation. This motivation\nalso lies at the heart of most SEE research. In\naddition, with the huge growth in the packaged\nsoftware industry, more attention has been focused\non software as an economic good.\nObstacles to Progress\nA number of factors militate against observing\nprogress in software engineering in general, and software\nengineering economics in particular. Software\nengineering focuses on the production of software,\nwhich is by its very nature a relatively intangible\ngood. Objectifying and measuring its many dimensions\nare often challenging to researchers. Even in\nsituations where we have relatively good softwarerelated\nartifacts to examine, there may be little evidence\nto examine concerning the process by which\nthey were constructed.\nEven if there were good access to project data,\nthere is another significant confounding factor. The\nnumber and complexity of applications for software\nhave grown very rapidly, fueled, in large measure, by\nthe dramatic improvements in hardware technology.\nAs hardware decreases in size and increases in performance\nper dollar, more applications can be justified.\nThis then creates demand for software. While\nthis tremendous demand for software has fueled the\nfortunes of many software developers and their organizations,\nit provides significant challenges to\nresearchers as we attempt to assess progress in the\ndelivery of software. Since the applications have\nchanged as well as the tools, it becomes very difficult\nto assess the impacts of these new tools. It may well\nbe the c
303641
don't think so, there is a big Linux/Unix sector. and that sector doesnot uses .NET. And on windows there is a big sector using i.e. PHP, Javs ...
253791
The future of .Net is looking excellent.  More and more large companies are adopting it for mission critical applications and onve most developers give it a try they never want to go back to where it is they have come from.  It's not going to go away any time soon.
159988
If J2EE was as bad as you think it is, why is it so widely used? Answer: it's not.\n\nIt's been a very long time since this technology could be accused of being generally inefficient. JIT and adaptive in-time compilers can actually recompile byte-code into assembley during runtime depending on how it's currently being used. This can produce faster execution in certain cases than C or C++.\n\nMost of the pain comes from starting the runtime, in an enterprise environment this is not an issue.\n\nPS. Remember it's just a specification. If you want to do Java just like C# (ie. compiled and ready to go as a binary), take a look at http://gcc.gnu.org/java/
62694
My guess would be J2EE... Java really hasn't made a lot of headway in desktop applications, the only place where Swing would obviously make sense.\n\nHowever, Java is used for a ton of back office system engineering now, where J2EE features would tend to be employed.
908927
Go for Black Book for VB.\nComplete Reference for C++ is good.\nC++, Java and .Net are valued.