A tough math question...?
111275
Is this a question of differential equations? Just curious because that's the only time that I have ever worked with equilibrium points...if so, the equation seems to be written incorrectly. It seems confusing to have x=-3x^2-x+2 because I would just rewrite it as: 3x^2+2x+2=0. If the left side is a function it should either be y(x) or preferably, dx/dt, or some x' value. Then knowing the initial condition x(0) would make sense. With these details, I would be able to calculate the equilibrium points and classify them. You would have x=2/3 and x=-1 as your two equilibrium points, and x=2/3 would be stable and x=-1 would be unstable. Hope this helps!
316406
Depends on how fast you're counting...\n\nhttp://hub1.worlded.org/docs/maththing/ny1p5.htm\nhttp://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/58739.html
859897
***************\nQUESTION 1\n***************\nOn the first question, we first have to find the equation that we will be solving for.  \n\nAssume that x is one integer.\nWe know that x+1 is the other integer because they are consecutive.\n\nSo we now put the wording into an equation\n1/3(x + (x+1)) = x - 5\n\nNow we solve the equation\n1/3(2x + 1) = x - 5\n2/3x + 1/3 = x - 5\n16/3 = 1/3x\n16 = x\n17 = x + 1\n\nOur two integers are 16 and 17.\n\nNow we check our answer.\n1/3 of 33 = 11 & 16 - 5 = 11 We are good! :)\n\n\n***************\nQUESTION 2\n***************\nEvery hour, Amy and Randy together walked 3.6 + 4.2 km apart from each other.\n\n3.6 + 4.2 = 7.8\n\nSo, every hour they will be 7.8 more km apart from each other.  We only want 10 minutes though, and there are 60 minutes in an hour. To get how far apart they will be in 10 minutes, we take:\n7.8 * 10/60 = 1.3\n\nRandy and Amy will be 1.3 km apart after 10 minutes.\n\nWe are done! :)
905350
_ E _ _ _ N _ !!! Well that is a tough one... Sorry I can't figure that one out 4 U!
236405
its easy to do the math.\n\n10*10*10*10 for the first one so 10000\n\n\n10*10*10*10*10 for the second one which is 100000\n\ndiffrent posibilities
151115
Would you please type your entire math question the way it is presented in your book? Your description is not enough for anyone to answer you correctly. Thanks!
137681
Ok...\nI see what you are doing...\nYou merely substitute the number in for x...\nso the problem becomes 6-2*(-1)\n6+2\n8
45380
its simple ... 80*70*60 ... 10*0 = 0 !!\n\nright isnt it ??? :D
1102373
i wont answer.... log onto www.mathguru.com and discover solutions with explanations.
500014
a. (x+9)(x-9)\nb.(t-2)(t+2)\nc. (b-12)(b+12)
697086
That's a tough one....\n\nUhhh...you??
903533
ignore the decimals when u originally do the problem, then however many deciams there are in both of the decimals you're multiplying is how many there will b in the answer. i.e. if you multiply 6.78x4.234 together the answer will have 5 numbers behidnthe dceimal point
663777
SOrry, I can't help you. If I had the formulas I could do it, but there is no way I remember that off the top of my head! Good luck
322820
mmh... thats a tough question.
832646
I'm sorry, but how could you not know this?\nThis is basic elementary math and if you don't know how to round you are in trouble.\nIt's 0.1 by the way
622612
Joel, you need some help.  This is one of the easiest questions I have ever heard!  You should know this, man!  You're gonna fail your test if you keep cheating on here and don't actually figure out how it works.  Good luck, brotha'\n\nL = -2 or L(x) = -2
780025
x ≤ 5\n\n-- - - - - - -s-