Egg first and chichen afterwards.Any doubts?
102816
which came first? The egg suggests evolution, as it formed and chickens sprang from it, while the chicken supports the theory of creation. God made all the animals, and whatnot. So it all really depnds on if you beleive God created the world or if you beleive we evolved.
166906
well it really depends on your religion. If you believe in God and that he created all things in the beginning, it would be the chicken because he created the animals first. If you don't believe in God, then there's really no answer unless the chicken slowly evolved to be an egg breeder, so that means teh chicken came first
1123206
Science tells us that chickens evolved from non-chickens through small changes caused by the mixing of male and female DNA or by mutations to the DNA that produced the zygote ( egg). These changes and mutations only have an effect at the point where a new zygote is created. That is, two non-chickens mated and the DNA in their new zygote contained the mutations that produced the first true chicken.  \nSo i would this it's safe to assume that the egg came first.\n\nBest of luck to you.
33036
The egg. Dinosaurs were laying eggs way before there were chickens!
1155740
egg... there are fish eggs before chicken eggs
76561
Egg.\n\nEnd of story.
572034
The chicken.The chicken is an actual chicken,where as the egg is a probable chiken.Actuality precedes  probability.Meaning the chicken comes before the egg
28233
Breakfast: Scrambled eggs\nLunch or dinner: Fried chicken\n\nTherefore, the egg came first.
454236
chicken came first!!\nPS:chicken comes in a dictionary before egg
985817
yes- the eggs are not always visible
993203
Eggs.  Fish lay 'em, and fish evolved before chickens.
1181853
These are quotes from the book, Do Fish Drink Water?\n\n"If you are a creationist, you believe God created man and all of the animals on the earth.  It wouldn't make a lot of sense for God to create an egg, so the chicken must have come first.  After all, if God created the egg first, there would be no hen to hatch it or to care for the chick once it was hatched"\n\n"If you are an evolutionist, you believe that animals evolve into different species over time.  Therefore the chicken must have evolved from a former chicken-like creature ((actually it evolved from reptiles like the T-rex))  At some point in time this creature laid an egg that hatched into a modern chicken.  It couldn't have been a chicken egg, because there was no such thing as a chicken yet.  The first chicken egg could only have been laid by the first chicken."\n\nBoth answers are the same depending if you're an evolutionist or a creationist.  The chicken came first!!!  =)
779014
EWWWWWWWWW ARE U CRAZY ?? \nROTTEN EGG ?? FOR GOD SAKE INAZZZZZ YOU ARE TO MUCH !!LOL......... !!\nI WANT TO PUKE NOW !!LOL...
1049016
Putting arguments of a religious nature to one side... Darwinian evolution would say that that which we call a chicken (due to its unique genetic code) would have come from an egg laid by an animal almost a chicken but genetically slightly different. The theory being that a random genetic variation in the DNA of the offspring made it differ from its parent enough to be a different spicies, ie the first chicken. If this is the case, and science supports the theory, then we have a choice to answer your question. We can say that the first chicken egg was laid by a non chicken (the egg came first) or the first chicken came from a non chicken egg (the chicken came first).
18310
Probably not.  If you believe in evolution, then remember that animals were laying eggs long before the chicken came along.
86425
The first chicken was hatched from an egg of something that was not quite a chicken. That's evolution :-)
997503
Which came first the chicken or the egg?\nThe egg is in the chicken and the chicken is in the egg.\nThey came as one.\n\nHeaven for one may well be Hell for another, and Hell for one may be Heaven for another.  Heaven and Hell make one Kingdom...\nThey came as one.\n\nYes and No...\nThey came as one.