in the book frankenstein By Mary Shelly why does the creater want to distroy eny evidence of his exsitance?
117752
Bcause if it did ne harm they could trace it back to him.
488576
Why do people fake evidence to try and prove the bible...???? same reasons Im sure
151516
One person claims that " you certainly have to avoid a huge amount of evidence to make such a claim." The same is true in reverse! \n\nMany people are ignorant and believe anything the government tells them. Truth is the holocaust industry is a billion dollar industry that also provides much revenue for the government. If the truth were known it would kill this huge industry of propaganda.\n\nMany people choose to be ignorant and don't know that there education is picked for them and they are trained to learn only what the government wants you to learn. Then comes the internet wereas we can no longer fool our children and they are learning the truth about hoaxes and other lies our government told us. Yet some people refuse to learn or even gather enough intestinal fortitude to even desire to know what is and what is not.\n\nThe links below will show that some people are so ignorant that even while they claim that one would have to avoid a hugh amount of evidence  to make such a claim would also support that they also would have  to avoid a huge amount of evidence to the contrary in order to substantiate such a ridiculous claim.\n\nSome countries are prosecuting people for holocaust denile. during their trial they are not alowed to provide any evidence agaisnt the so-called holocaust or they will be charged again. Once found guilty and denied any real defence they will serve 3 or more years for holocaust denile. Their attornies are not alowed to use anything that debunks the holocaust or they also will be charged with holocaust denile. See how morbidly insane this is! There is literally no defense , once you are charged there is no manner in which you can defend yourself because it is illegal to deny the holocaust. They have a win-win situation and you have the lose-lose situation. \n\n This is morbidly insane and only insane minds would support such a trial. Any government that supports this kind of trial  ceases to be the governemnt of the people and has selected one event over all events in history to protect. It has become a religion of the sick minded and surely will evolve in such a manner in the future that those who perpetrated this insane witch hunt will become the victims of their own insane hoax upon their people they swore to government with honesty.\n\nIf the holocaust is such a true event then it needs no laws to protect it because it will stand on its own merit. TRUTH NEEDS NO LAWS TO PROTECT IT ,ONLY LIARS AND DECIEVERS NEED LAWS TO PROTECT THEM AND THEIR LIES. That is why this needs laws to protect it, because it is flawed and most certainly a hoax.\n\nIf the holocaust were a true event it would defeat any denier in court on its own merit. It can't, therefore it is a lie that needs laws to keep certain people from questioning and investigating it for truth. It is insane, and any who do not thrive for the truth and search the other side of the story insanely follow the insane.\n\nTell me how insane it is that Hitler only wanted an aryan race of people whom are blue eyed and blonde hair when he alone had dark brown eyes and black hair and was half Jew himself. Look it up, don't trust Google but look it up under "HITLERS JEWISH ARMY." If this is true and history shows it to be true then the Jews are responsible for it alone and the burden should be lifted off everyones sholders.\n\nOh here it is (added at a later date) Hitlers Jewish Army :\nhttp://www.kansaspress.ku.edu/righit.html\n\nAlso: http://www.hfienberg.com/kesher/2002/09/were-there-jews-in-hitlers-army-if.html\n\nProof Hitler was a Jew NOT A GERMAN :http://worldwarll.www4.50megs.com/ahlife.htm\n\nThis is documented fact so now we can put it to rest and say that Jews are responsible for the so-called holocaust upon their own people. Shame on them! They did it to themselves , end of story, they owe us all reparations for hoaxing us and taking our much earned money to support their fraud upon America and the rest of the world
874207
that is funny.  someone saying "Why would you believe a race of aliens without question?? Just because they have traveled through space doesn't make them trustworthy."  why would you believe a book just because it was written along time ago?
167680
Sometimes people ask for their own curiosity...just to know.\n\nMANY ask because they seek the TRUTH...sensing that something is amis in their own beliefs. Many are justified in doing this; because, false teaching and prophets are PLENTIFUL in these LAST days. Of course Jesus warned of this long ago.. \n2Pe 2:3  And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth no\n\nand also\n(2Ti 3:1)  This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.\n(2Ti 3:2)  For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,\n(2Ti 3:3)  Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,\n(2Ti 3:4)  Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;\n(2Ti 3:5)  Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.\n(2Ti 3:6)  For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,\n(2Ti 3:7)  Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.\n\nIs it any wonder that so many seek and don't seem to find the TRUTH.\n\nThey are looking in the wrong place...they need to search the BIBLE.....\n\n(Rom 3:3)  For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?\n(Rom 3:4)  God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.\n\nThe "Church" that Christ is the HEAD of is not a literal (carnal) building....it is a spiritual temple...\n\nMat 21:42  Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the Scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes? \nAND\nHeb 4:14  Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession. \nand\nHeb 9:11  But Christ being come a high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building; \n\nI hope this helps, Lord willing,\nKen Sisk\nksisk35@cableone.net\n\nPS You can learn a great deal more from the Bible and my friend's website below than any of the so called (money loving) big time preachers of this day.....the truth is a very PRECIOUS commodity.
673903
that is a good question and they do it because they think that if they say that they can then you will believe them and you wont make them actually prove it.\n              signed\n                 temptation
467802
He or she can probably get into more trouble by withholding evidence.  The words that come to mind are: accessory after the fact.  I believe that could apply here.
483801
Obviously, proof is a little hard here. It is quite impossible for anyone to PROVE they know anything about this topic.\n\nTry reading Dante's "The Divine Comedy". It is quite intriguing to say the least.
504214
Why would someone concern themselves with theories when we have the Truth available to us. \n\n\nhttp://www.chick.com/information/general/salvation.asp
342275
LOL! That is a weird theory, but I know what you mean. It is a joke to think people would take a book as more proof than scientific facts. And a god that is constantly destroying his own creation for political reasons is even more absurd.
1006647
this because the state's responsibility is to show cause...once they show that they have siffcient evidence to go to trial...(and the bar can be low/high depending on state/country/crime)... then the question of innocence or guilt is one of for a jury/judge. at which point the state presents its case and if the bruden of proof is met, then the accussed can be found guilty.\n\nhearsay (except for dying declarations from a victim etc) is not admissible as evidence which means that the state probably has some compelling evidence albeit circumstancial, that they can proceed with prosecution. i suggest you/accussed get a lawyer.
497635
I think it is a scare tactic. I do believe in mediums, but not emily rose type posessions. I don't get why a "demon" would want to possess a body, only to harm it. It is like buying a house only to burn it up.
827923
writers will always try to convince the reader to belive what they belive. that's why you are taught in writing class in college. If they could not write a good argument, they wouldn't be hired by the new york times etc..etc. \nIf they belive somthing in plictics or history, they might write a rather slanted artcile about it only giving the pros or ekse the cons of that particulllar isssue.
999606
The request for evidence depends in the assertion being made by someone else.\n\nI wouldn't bother asking for evidence for a god like that of Spinoza or Don S (only god can in this case), I do not expect to get any evidence for such beings. If someone believes god can be only known through faith, I wouldn't ask for evidence either.\n\nNow, there are assertions that deserve being questioned. Once someone proposed that there is a "dimension of light" where god lives. Wouldn't you like to know what evidence there is to make such assertion? I can accept someone believes this through "faith", but if someone insists there is a "logical conclusion" to determine its existence, I'd ask for it. If someone had the evidence, I'd like to give it a try.\n\nI could give you other examples, but this is enough, it's all about the specific assertion.\n\nSo, I'd only ask for proof depending it what is being proposed. Even though I have to point out that, usually, I'm here to share my point of views and not to ask for proof of anything.\n\nI've got e-mails telling me I'll burn in hell... And their evidence is? o.0
744730
Why would they when doctors obtain there knowledge from those science books written by the devil.\nTammi Dee
539351
its an issue of faith perhaps...as an atheist you are not bound by any desire or "code" of what you can or can not subject yourself to...\nas a christian, why would someone want to expose themselves to something that goes against their faith and against god, doing so might get god rather pi$$ed at them and then he won't cure their aunt or help them find their hat when they pray.  ok, that was pushing it a bit far...but you see what i'm saying?  on one hand someone has a code of conduct to not expose themselves to certain things, and on the other you do not....now its not like it is written in stone (no pun intended) that christians not read or look at atheist things...but its acted as if it is...never mind christian scholars who study non-christian subjects to be able to refute them....i guess they are just making a sacrifice for the rest.  \npretty much ever religion has this sort of built into it anyway...if it didn't people might be constantly jumping sides as they learn about other religions...the point of a religion is to get and keep followers, and that requires keeping alot of people in the dark.  since religion has no actual physical "law enforcement" for it, it does it using threats of eternal damnation.
544200
See if a local historian knows anything about it. They might know because, as I always say, "If there's on person interested in it then there must be another" since how the brain works and all that are very related and there are good possibilities that someone else has also heard of the case and would like more info just like you and it's probably the local historian.