Does anyone know something about Serbia&Montenegro?
111375
Everybody with internet access knows something about it, or can. :-)\n\nClick the link below for the information that I (now) know about it.
527373
NO for Australia because they're first make it in 1974. Then they just wait 32 years to make it again.\n\nYES for Serbia and Montenegro. Because they appeared on the international stage under the banner of Yugoslavia until 2003.
1187889
Hmmmmmmmm i dont know. The team spirit in Serbian cmp was low as Serbia & Montenegro are now separate countries, the lack of unity in the team was evident. I also think Argentina face the danger of peaking too early. Remember 2002 where they played brilliantly before the Wc then lost their way ? but i must say that was a mesmerizing performance, beautiful!
928002
I know that  in '99, Allbright, at Billy's pleasure, loosed Weasly Clark on the Serbians by unleashing a bombing campaign that lasted 78 days and nights, destroying all the infrastructure and every bridge along the Danube.\n\nAccording to NATO, US. Military estimates and UN approximations, roughly twenty-eight hundred Serbian civilian were killed, while little of military value was rendered combat-ineffective.\n\nSlobidan was a thug, but he had some monstrous men under his command.\nI personally don't believe Milosevic knew the full extent of the horrors at Sebrenica.\n\nAnyway, It was the Muslim separatists that violated the Dayton accords by burning churches and killing Serb policeman in '99 that led to Clinton's green-lighting the bombing campaign on the Serbs.\n\nSo much for that vaunted "Democrat Party Diplomacy"\n\nBill and Hillary provided logistical and monetary funding for the party that rivaled Milosevic's, thus guaranteeing a victory for the Clinton backed horse.\n\nI believe this election occurred shortly after the conflict, maybe 2000, 2001, somewhere in that time frame, and this paved the way for land and border concessions.\n\nI may be WAY of the mark here, but I pulled this from memory as I think If I were to Goggle it I'd be fraud.\n\nBetter to be wrong and willing to be corrected than be a hack.\n\nMy GUESS is that US-backed NATO forces provided military support and cover. If this is true then it would have certanly been in violation of  UN resolutions.\n\nI don't balme the US military, I fault the Clinton administration.\n\nTell me if I'm way off.
468765
Not a country yet... But in KOSOVO they LOVE America (and Clinton) Because they bombarded Serbia, and thus helped them towards Independence.\n\nKUWAITies like America too. Why? USA liberated them.
926286
First, let's get things straightened out.The situation in Kosovo has no relation [at all] to your examples stated.\n\nThis problem started at the end of World War One. Russia wins the Russo-Turk War and therefore has control over the terms of territorial loss of the Ottoman Empire. Russia [planning to make a dwarf clone of the Soviet Union in the Balkans] makes up a team of delegates [Bulgaria, Rumania, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece] to decide the fate of the Balkans - The Treaty of Bucharest of 1913.\n\nBulgaria [initially intended to be the center of the Slavic Kingdom in the Balkans] had the largest territory by far within the Balkans, including additional Albanian territory added to its province of Macedonia (1)\n\nHowever, Western Powers feared a Soviet influenced Bulgaria would make way for a Soviet outlet into the Aegean Sea. This territory, as a result, was ceded to Greece (2).\n\nGreece also cooperated with the alliance of Serbia and Montenegro to split up Bulgaria's province of Macedonia and Albanian territory amongst themselves. Greece and Serbia nearly double their original territory(3).\n\nThese three countries outnumbered Bulgaria's and Rumania's say in the Treaty and a new center of a Slavic kingdom is settled, which is to be Serbia's YUGOSLAVIA.\n\nEthnic cleansing of the Albanians were commited by both Serbia and Greece to have a legitimate reason in controlling the territories of Kosovo and Chameria respectively (4).\n\nIn conclusion, Kosovo [which Serbia only used to drain its resources] should gain its independence to correct the end results of treaties that ceded territory to countries other than the population of its inhabitants.\n\n**** Dear third answerer,\nNote Vojvodina and that Kosovo as a province had loss of territory to Serbia and Montenegro\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vojvodina\n\n"honestly i've never heard of greeks commiting any crimes against albanians..."\nQuote: Joseph Jacobs, head of the US Mission in Albania (1945-1946) wrote:\n\nIn March 1945 units of Zervas's dissolved forces carried out a massacre of Chams in the Filiates area, and practically cleared the district of the Albanian minority. According to all the information I have been able to gather on the Cham issue, in the fall of 1944 and during the first months of 1945, the authorities in north-western Greece perpetrated savage brutality by evicting some 25,000 Chams - residents of Chameria - from their homes. They were chased across the border after having been robbed of their land and property. Hundreds of male Chams from the ages of 15 to 70 were interned on the islands of the Aegean Sea. In total 102 mosques were burnt down.\n\n"non-albanians in kosovo live in ww2-alike ghettos with no electical power and plumbings"\n\nCould this be Serbia's fault ????? \n****
29164
country maybe,not a nation..Yugoslavia
244691
This question is very extreme.  I don't believe that people around the world hate Serbians.
574113
Actually, in addition to Montenegro voting to separate from Serbia, Spain is having issues with separatism in its regions.  The Basque country has long wanted an independent state that would take territory from Spain and France.  Catalonia has recently moved towards greater autonomy, and the other regions jealously want to ensure that they receive similar rights vis a vis the central government.  While the UK is not separating, the devolution movement has been strong there in recent history, and Wales and Scotland will probably continue to push for greater autonomy within the UK framework.  History suggests that change alone is constant.
288361
UK, Russia, Serbia, later Italy, later the US.
496448
Yes, FIFA will allow Serbia and Montenegro to participate in World Cup 2006. U21 Serbia and Montenegro already plays in Euro Cup 2006, regardless Serbia and Montenegro no longer exists. In the worst case, only Serbia will get rights for participating in FIFA World Cup (as they are successors of the state union).
1043924
Well first of all, I think that Serbia and Montenegro's girls are cuties! :)\n\nBut well, in the World Cup, they got hard teams to play. I personally like how Kezman plays in Atletico de Madrid, but seems that he didn't show his soccer abilities at this cup, part of that is because he got expelled in the match against Argentina, so he could show his good soccer against Cote dIvore.\n\nI don't know the other players in that team, but they maked Spain to go second in the Qualification round, when Spain was the favourite to win that group. So that is a lot for this team, that in the next world cup I think they are going to show good soccer.\n\nPD: I also like Kezmans beard style!.
422717
Znam zbog ja sam bila tamo :-)\n\n\n\nNovi Sad is in Vojvodinja. Serbia\n\n\nNovi Sad (Serbian: Нови Сад or Novi Sad; Slovak: Nový Sad; Hungarian: Újvidék; Croatian: Novi Sad; Romanian: Novi Sad; Rusin: Нови Сад; German: Neusatz (an der Donau); Latin: Neoplanta) is a city located in Serbia and Montenegro; it lies in the northern Serbian province of Vojvodina and is located at 45.25° N, 19.85° E, on the banks of the Danube river. It is the capital city of the Vojvodina province and a large industrial and cultural centre. Its name means "New Planting" (noun) in Serbian.\n\nNovi Sad City is divided into two municipalities: Novi Sad and Petrovaradin. Between 1980 and 1989, the city was divided into seven municipalities: Stari Grad, Podunavlje, Liman, Slavija, Petrovaradin, Detelinara, and Sremski Karlovci.\n\nThe city's population was 215,659 in 2002 and 298,139 with the surrounding inhabited places of the municipalities included. An unofficial estimate of the current city's urban area population is approximately 400,000.\n\nThe urban area of Novi Sad comprises Novi Sad proper and the towns of Petrovaradin and Sremska Kamenica. The metropolitan area of Novi Sad also comprises Futog, Veternik, Bukovac and Ledinci. There are also several other settlements in the municipalities, but these settlements are not connected to the city.\n\nNovi Sad is the second largest city in Serbia and Montenegro (after Belgrade) and the administrative centre of the South Bačka District of Serbia. According to the 2002 census, the population of the municipal area of Novi Sad (including both municipalities) is composed of: Serbs (75.50%), Hungarians (5.24%), Yugoslavs (3.17%), Slovaks (2.41%), Croats (2.09%), Montenegrins (1.68%), and others. Most of the inhabited places in the municipalities have an ethnic Serb majority, while the village of Kisač have an ethnic Slovak majority. The population of Novi Sad city (excluding municipal area) is composed of: Serbs (73.91%), Hungarians (6.03%), Yugoslavs (3.69%), Montenegrins (2.23%), Croats (1.84%), and others
478841
It is a state union of two former Yugoslav republics.\nthey are neighbouring states in the Balkan Peninsular.
243417
The capital of the Former Yugoslavia, comprised of Serbia & Montenegro, is Belgrade. The republics that have ceased to be part of Yugoslavia, such as Croation and Slovenia, obviously have their own capitals.
1140275
It was Clinton politics, the serbs were not following the reforms the US  were directing. The serb were still having a socialist for president, undercutting him was accelarating the old soviet socialist influence in this part of the world..\n\nNato Clinton invented a genocide to intervene in former Yougoslavia..\ndoes anyone knows that this famous genocide victims were about 2000 ? does anyone knows that these 2000 deaths occured after the bombing of Kosovo does anyone knows that these were more likely victim of figthings? \n\n\nDoes anyone knows that nobody ws able to proof any possible contegincy plan to commit atrocities at all ? this was the biggest hoax of all..\n\n\ngenocide? there were never a genocide, there were a massacre but no genocide and even after 13 years of investigation nato and the Court for the former yugoslavia were unable to stick a genocide crime on slobovic. This was a political embarassment for the West especially because Slobovic wasnt an expanstionist but had agreed and signed for the independence of these people..\n-------------------------------\n\nHey magic Gather upthere ? thank you you just described the republican party..
576667
Serbia and Montenegro definitely should not be underestimated. Of course the defense with the "Famous Four" has already been widely celebrated because they only received 1 goal during the World Cup qualification matches.\n\nHowever, their midfield is also strong with Djordjevic and Stankovic, and they have a very dangerous striker Kezman.\n\nGroup C is really going to be a very tough group. Personally, I think The Netherlands and Serbia & Montenegro are going through to the second round, although it's going to be close.\n\nIt really is just impossible to predict.\n\nJudging by your name "Nenad", I guess you are Serbian yourself? I'm from the Netherlands and I've visited your country many times. It's beautiful and I love the Serbian people. Good luck to you in the World Cup!