Hey, is there anyone here who was involved in women's rights?
114423
Wesley, I am 51 and still very involved.  I am not sure if I meet your criteria but will be happy to help.
456548
So, why does there have to be "Women's Rights","Mens Rights" or any special consideration or privileges for anyone based on sex, religion or the color of one's skin?  Why not just make it all "Human Rights!"
762269
yes\n\nobgyn, free clinic, planned parent hood, and i may have like a thousand to donate to you for your cause. Email me and tell me where to send them.
341608
We gave up a really good thing when we went for women rights.\n\nWe lost the right to be good mothers.  What's so good about having to work and not even having the choice to stay home most of the time?
1089182
Not many according to my research. That's a neat question though, you don't really think about disabled FEMALE veterans. Are you one of  them? If so then I want to thank you for serving our country and now having to pay the price for doing so. May God bless you and yours.
531654
I agree we need to get some ladies with good agenda into politics and let them have a chance to fix what the male politicos have been unable to.\n\nGood Luck and God Bless!!
904303
I have capitalized the changes I feel are needed.\n\nIt is not a distinction achieved by \nmany (A deleted) women of genius. That is the true\ntest OF the changed position of women \nin India. What really is epochal or marks\na revolutionary CHANGE is their free\nand equal participation IN all spheres of\nnational activity, and AT every level,\nfrom work in villages to NATIONAL government. \nIt was never a part of the \nIndian tradition that women WERE INFERIOR by nature.\n\nFOLLOW-UP: (Now that you have explained exactly what you need I have rewritten as follows) (And I find nothing wrong with the very first line):\n\nIt is not a distinction achieved by \nmany a WOMEN-WOMAN of genius that is the true\ntest FROM-OF the changed position of women \nin India. What really is epochal OR-AND marks\na revolutionary CHANGES-CHANGE is their free\nand equal participation ON-IN all spheres of\nnational activity, and IN-ON every level,\nfrom work in villages to A GOVERNMENT-GOVERNING of\nTHE COUNTRIES- A COUNTRY. It was never a part of the \nIndian tradition that women WAS-WERE by nature inferior.
520147
tell them that your against women's suffrage.\n\nmost females are too dim to know that 'suffrage' is the right to vote.\n\nthey'll think that you're a classy guy because you don't want women to 'suffer' needlessly.\n\nlol!
283991
Doing a google or wikipedia search on the topic is a good place to start.  Consider some of the famous advocates, what they did to prove women deserved equal rights, like susan anthony going to jail.  Also see if you can find Sojourner Truth's speech "ain't I a woman?"
1258
While abortion obviously affects women's bodies, maybe that is only 15% of the issue?  Perhaps the other 85% are social, religious and scientific?  So the parts dedicated to women's reproductive rights aren't the major parts of the issue, but rather the unknown and arguable stuff that I just gave an 85% weight.
949704
National Organization for Women\nhttp://www.now.org/
157413
if "women rights" in your opinion is when a woman gets money for showing her body as a tool for advertisment and being so cheap ... then no, we muslims have no women rights\n\n\n\n\n\n\nUNLESS you mean women right to go work in a safe working condition and having the right to vote then yes we have women rights since 1400 yrs ago up to this minute.\n\n\n\nabout the retards husbands that treats their wives badly we can find those retards in any religon and not only Islam.\n\n\n\n\n\nProphet Muhammad (may peace and blessings of God be upon him) said: "Treat women well and be kind to them; they are your partners and committed helpers\n\n\n\n\nProphet Muhammad(PBUH) said: "Only an honorable man treat women with honor and integrity. And only a mean, deceitful and dishonest man humiliates and insults women." Referring to physical abuse, he added: "Never hit your wives, they are your partners and sincere helpers." He exemplified this by never, ever, hitting a women or child. The Prophet guaranteed protection of the life, honor, and property of women.
945445
Yes, but not as they did: justifying the move on security grounds. I would do it based on equal rights. \n\nIn a democratic country no woman (or man) should be treated in a way that violates her right to be free (even if she is used to deny herself).
742275
Yes, I think women should have the right to choose.  :)
1027819
good on you mate ... I belive in equal rights too ... keep on diggin !!!
1050593
What about the women?
793985
Not really. Even though we've screwed up a lot of things in the world, I think that we're still making progress. Do you really want to go back to the days where people of color were lynched, the Soviet Union painted a big target on the U.S. and women didn't have the right to make choices about their own bodies or their lives? No thanks.