is it true that you can find the lowest term for this fraction?
110668
No. 13 is a prime number so you don't have a chance.
726234
Is this one big fraction, or is the only fraction .02x/ .03x^3 ?
1162826
Least common denominator is (x-3)(x+3).\n\n2/(x-3)(x+3) + 3*(x-3)/(x-3)(x+3)\n\n(2+3x-9)/(x-3)(x+3)\n\n(3x-7)/(x-3)(x+3).
475793
ill explain. to subtract or add fractions, you have to get a common denominator. to do this, you have to find the lowest common multiple of the denominators of both fractions. so what is the lowest number that can be divided by 10 and 6 easily. the answer is 30 in this case. cuz 10*3 = 6*5 = 30.\n\nso now that you know what the denominator has to be, you have to convert each fraction to a fraction that has 30 as the denominator. so for 7/10, you can multiply top and bottom by 3 to get 21/30. its the opposite of reducing the fractions. think of it this way:\n7/10 * 3/3 = 21/30.   since 3/3 =1, youre just multiplying the fraction by 1, which doesnt change anything.\n(7/10 * 3/3) - (1/6 * 5/5)\n= 21/30 - 5/30\n= (21-5)/30.... once you have a common denominator, u can subtract the numerators.\n= 16/30\n= 8/15.\n\nhope this helped. let me know if u need more help.
2056
You are trying to get the smallest number on top (numerator) and bottom (denominator). You divide the numerator and denominator by the same number.\n\nFor example, 180/240 can be simplified by dividing the numerator and denominator by 10 to get 18/24. Next you can divide the numerator and denominator by 6. 18 divided by 6 is 3, and 24 divided by 6 is 4 to get a simplified fraction of 3/4. \n\nThe trick is knowing which numbers divide the numerator and denominator evenly.
180224
Not necessarily.  If the answer to a division problem is 7.5, then the answer is 7 and a half (half of what you're dividnig by).\n\nExample- 15 divided by 2 is 7.5, but the remainder in this problem is 1, not 5 (1 is half of 2).
93955
change mixed fractions to proper fractions and then divide,\nwhats so hard?
398086
alright - the fractions you have given me are called unlike fractions which means they have a different denominator. to compare fractions the first thing you need to do is make them like(same denominator) -now,a fraction remains the same if you multiply the numerator and denominator with the same number. So look at your denominators-3,5,4,8. you need to find a number that is a common multiple for all these numbers-if you look at it, you dont see any immediate number as such-so just multiply all of these numbers to get their common multiple(ideally you should look for the lowest common multiple) which gives 480. now,multiplying the numerators with the corresponding numbers we get the following fractions: 320/480,192/480,360/480,300/480.\nnow that you have all the like fractions, though these may look different, they are actually same as the original fractions that you gave me. all you have to do now is arrange them in ascending order of numerators which gives:\n192/480 , 300/480 , 320/480 , 360/480\nnow writing the corresponding original values,your answer is:\n2/5 , 5/8 , 2/3 , 3/4\n\nthis is one method,another method involves direct division and then comparing the value, but you will get the same answer
262787
that's as low as it'll go, nothing can be divided out of anything in the numerator or the denominator.  That's because there's not any like terms.  In other words, c nor d is in both parts of either the top or the bottom.  I hope you understood that, but trust me on this one.  Calculus us hard.
392111
Find the least number that each can be divided by....Such as(example) 1/2+ 1/3= the lowest denominator would be 6 since 2x3=6 and 3x2=6 so both can be multiplied to make that number. So if you use that common denominator of 6 the problem would be set up like this 3/6+2/6=5/6
882170
mm cm dm m km\nmillimetre, centimetre, decimetre, metre, kilometre,\n\nwoops - thats the least to greatest - turn it around
783756
in standard form yes, but thats not the whole answer, the answer would be x to the 2 power and -1
924404
This one is a candidate for l'Hopital's rule.  Take the derivative of both numerator and denominator, and the resulting fraction (if not of the form 0/0) will give the limit.  If you get 0/0, do it again.
705869
1. When numerators are the same - the larger denominators are actually the smallest  6/10 - 6/9 - 6/7\n2. ok you do number 2\n3. Different numerators - now we must make the denominators the same - so find the lowest common denom - 20?  now multiply\n4/10= 8/20   3/5 = 12/20  and 9/20\nso 8/20 12/20 and 9/20 ...put them in order - then reduce back down\n4. all are 2's so handle like #1\n5. handle like number 3\n\n8 - only two you have to check as one is a 15 - it's the least - now check the fraction of the two 16's\n\ngood luck
1136923
The world nows that the "numerator" is the number on top of a fractional expression, and that "denomanator" is not a word, but that "denominator" is the number on the bottom of a fractional expression.  I congratulate you on already "nowing" this, since this means your math skills greatly outscale your English language skills! LOL
816466
Aegor is correct, but here's another way to see it.  Simplify h(x) by multiplying top and bottom of the fraction by e^x; then \nh(x) = [e^(2x) - 1]/[e^(2x) + 1].  (Note careful use of brackets.)  Clearly, as x tends to minus infinity, e^(2x) tends to zero, so h(x) tends to just -1/1, i.e. -1.\n\nLive long and prosper.
763343
Heartsense is right.  I'm chiming in to say if you mean the product of 5/6 * 6/7 * 7/8 * 8/9 * ..., then that product tends to 0 since the denominator of the nth term cancels out with the numerator of the (n+1)st term, so as n approaches infinity, you get 5 over infinity (not really "over infinity" but you know what I mean) = 0.