what would be the same level in mens tennis seeding for top seeded woman tennis player today?
105328
Are you asking where would the top women players fit in the men's ranks? I'll assume that's the question, but please clarify if that is not the case.\nFirst, I am glad that Billie Jean King had the sense to avoid this comparison, and to establish the women's tour as a phenomenon that stands on its own merits. I love women's tennis, and don't care if they are able to compete effectively against the men.\nHaving said that, there is ample evidence that the top women would not be able to compete successfully against the men's pros. Billie Jean King beat a 55-year-old man (who previously beat another top woman, Margaret Smith). There just is too much difference in speed of foot and spin and pace of the ball. The top women players of today would almost certainly be unsuccessful in the men's tour, whether the main events or satellites. \nMale players often play practice matches against top women, and I think you will find that even good college players will beat all or nearly all of the women.\nThis is not to diminish in any way the quality of women's tennis, which is tremendous. I just know that to date the top women would not be close to being competitive against male pros.
1036535
En fonction du ranking a la WTA ou ATP. Les 32 premiers mondiaux en grand chelem et 16 premiers en Masters. Sauf à Wimbledon ou les têtes de series sont données en fonction des résultats sur gazon dans les 12 derniers mois (75%) et le classement ATP ou WTA pour le reste.
1034312
Federer seems like a pretty good bet. He's won the last three and he looks like he's adjusting to grass well this year.\nOn the women's side there's not really a clear favorite but Sharapova's got a decent chance. Maybe Mauresmo too.
778923
http://www.wtatour.com for woman &\nhttp://www.atptour.com for men.\n\nTey are both great websites. They give rankings and photos of all the players too. You can even do this really cool thing called Head to Head, where you can put 2 players together to match up their rankings.\nIf you want to do Head to Head, go to the top of the page and click on "players", it will be in a red toolbar. Then you will see it on the top of the screen where you need to enter the players last names!
665852
Rank players 1 through 16. Make sure all first-round matches have the ranks equal to 17 (i.e., 1 vs. 16, 2 vs. 15, etc., etc.)\n\nQuarterfinals -- 1/16 vs. 8/9, 5/12 vs. 4/13, 3/14 vs. 6/11, 7/10 vs. 2/15\n\nSemifinals -- winner of No. 1 seed bracket vs. winner of No. 4 seed bracket, winner of No. 2 seed bracket vs. winner of No. 3 seed bracket\n\nFinals -- Semifinal winners
928574
There are 4 major tournaments. Wimbledon , French Open , Australian Open and the US Open.  Check those websites four some good history.  You will be able to click on history of the tournament right on the web site. \n      Look up Billi Jean King.  She had a huge impact on the equality of Women in sports.\nThe US governing Body is called the USTA.  There website will give you good stuff to copy from.\nYou touch on the stuff I just told you , you will be golden.
384480
Its not what you think. They are seeded 1 vs. 4 but they just number them from top to bottom.
596271
MEN:\nIt is most likely that Nadal will make it into the final, but if Federer makes it to the final too, Federer might beat Nadal. Federer has been adjusting to Nadal's play on clay, and i think Federer will put an end to Nadal's winning streak on clay, because what goes up must come down. But, if Federer does not make it to the Final (maybe gets beaten by Nalbandian if on the same side of the draw), then Nadal has the best chance. So my point is: Federer has the best chance then the rest at beating Nadal on clay.\n\nWOMEN:\nThis one is mostly a wild guess since dominance in women's tennis is very distributed. In fact, there has not been a women in tennis in the past 10(?) grand slams that has won at least 2 out of those 10(?) grand slams. But here are my predictions of who has a chance: WINNERS: Hardenne, Petrova, or Kuznetsova. RUNNER UPS: Hingis, Clijsters, or Mauresmo.
1015377
1 Amelie Mauresmo\n2 Kim Clijsters \n3 Nadia Petrova \n4 Maria Sharapova \n5 Justine Henin-Hardenne  \n6 Mary Pierce \n7 Lindsay Davenport \n8 Elena Dementieva \n9 Patty Schnyder\n10 Svetlana Kuznetsova
1036328
pairing all players and you will have 8 pair of players facing to each other for the first round, then you will have 4 pairs of winners for the second round. after that you will have the last 4 winning players in the semifinal to go for the final match. it's like a form of a pyramid facing side way to the right. do you have seeded players? player considered as seeded 1 to be put as the first name (pair # 1), seeded 2 as the last name (in pair # 8 in your case). seeded 3 in pair # 4, and seeded 4 in pair # 5. if you would i could send you a sample sheet to your email.
678660
Stupid question - tennis
567310
A player's ranking refers to how high they are ranked compared to all other professional players. A players seeding refers to how high they are ranked compared to other players in a specific tournament. The higher they are ranked, the higher they'll be seeded. For example, David Nalbandian is ranked 3 in the world, after Federer and Nadal. If he was playing in the same tournament as both of them, he would be seeded 3rd. If neither of them were in the tournament however, he would become the #1 seed as he would then be the highest ranked player in the tournament.
987478
Nadal will definetely advance to, atleast, the quarter-finals. He's got so much intensity and he hardly makes any unforced errors. Based on this season, he should without a doubt be seeded ahead of Roddick. Watch out though, Roddick's serve will be blazing fast on grass.
667729
It depends all a bit! \n\nI'm from Australia and while I agree that at major levels women don't always achieve equality, there are other major levels of Australian sport where they really lead the way - say, our female Olympic swimming team are seen as the highlights of our swimming here. \n\nAt local levels though sport is quite equal. There is nothing at all stopping girls from playing traditionally male sports such as football, rugby - in fact, when I finished up school two years ago our high school actually had a female rugby contest! \n\nAt local levels, sport seems to be fairly equal in Australia and the areas that aren't so equal are certainly catching up. Definitely rural Australia where I'm from is quite even...we don't really have the population out here to segregate so it seems naturally blended. \n\nEmail me if I can help more! robforster15@hotmail.com
152471
Yeah that could happen, or not.  Would they play by the men's or women's rules aka would there be checking or not?  Are you spotting the women a 10 goal lead or only 5.
405538
http://www.atptennis.com/en/newsandscores/draws/
1183377
I don't mean to be rude, but women do not do less work in tennis! \n\nWimbledon officials have increased this year's prize money by 5% in the singles competition.\n\nThe increase means the men's champion will pocket £525,000, while the women's top prize is £486,000.\n\nYes, we admit that men are stonger, that's why they play 5 sets - however it doesn't mean that women work less hard - they play 3 sets because physically their bodies can only cope with that level.