WHY does the FDA the right to arest you in your residests?  If your a California State Law under Pos. 215?
104221
Good Lord.  And this is what our public schools are putting out.\n\nLet me try to answer some of this but you're going to have to fix your question because some of it is truly impossible to understand with the way you have written it.\n\nIf you're asking why the FDA has the right to arrest you in your residence, you're humorously mistaken.  The FDA does not have the authority to arrest anyone, period. \n\nThen you start talking about Prop. 215 which, for those who don't live here, is the Compassionate Use of Marijuana Act (the legislation that made marijuana legal for medical purposes).  \n\nSo I'm thinking you want to know why the FDA can arrest you in your residence if you are a medical marijuana user.  And the answer, of course, is that they can't.  \n\nThen you're asking about raids on cannabis clubs, and frankly, because of your extremely poor writing skills, I'm just not sure what it is you want to know about raids on clubs.  Please tell me you're still in grade school because if you're any older than six, you really need to get some help with your abilities to communicate in writing.
681473
Find a legal advisor. I think you should solve the metter legally. It is the best way, in my opinion, to protect your rights.
92203
It depends on what state you're in.  California has a number of laws on this issue, but if you're not in California, I'm not sure what to tell you.\n\nYou need to give your state.
874371
All states, some counties, and the Federal government have standards for what is a cancer-causing level of a particular chemical.\n\nA California law known as "Prop 65" requires that any product sold in the state or manufactured or even imported THROUGH the state be labeled if the state deems it to contain cancer causing chemicals.\n\nSince California is a major port, industrial state, and has the largest population (over 10 per cent of the US total), most manufacturers find it more cost effective to print the required Prop. 65 warning on ALL products rather than risk a lawsuit.
1086052
It's not allowed... only employees are allowed in the food prep areas.  It's a violation of many health codes too.
130833
probably, yes.  If you own or run a restaurant & keep a cat, or you know someone who does, I suggest you get in touch with your county's/state's health board & find out about that.....I'm pretty sure that's some serious health code violation.
995399
because it is a huge revenue source for law enforcement. it is also an aid to justify taking away more of your rights. the highway patrol is trying to get a law passed in which they may stop you and swab your mouth to see if you are supposedly under the influence.
986562
why is it my B.S. sensors are going off right now?\n\nFederal law requires a signature when picking up presciptions....ESPECIALLY narcotics. They also require the person selling the medication to either personally know who it is they are giving it to or ID them if they don't. Most states require ID to be documented for all narcotic purchases, even when selling it to your mother.\n\nSo who's lying?
866956
Don't know specifically for California, but in some states, Operating a Motor Vehicle Under the Influence, is illegal anywhere.  Many of the laws are non-specific, as to the place.
373882
You may or may not have a case, i guess i dont know the details. If he discussed the case with the cashier in an effort to solve the problem of who has the script, I dont think it would be a privacy violation (I maybe wrong) especially if he didnt disclose to her what drug you were taking. And its going to be hard to prove by word of mouth that this isnt what happened. If it was a personal conversation though and then it would probably be a HIPPA violation.  I'm an intern in pharmacy school but I'm not a legal expert so I don't know every little detail and what counts as a HIPPA violation and what doesnt. Also, if they end up not having that your ex isnt allowed to pick up your Rx you might have a tough time proving your case. Like I said though, I dont know the details of the incident nor am i familiar with the situation, and I'm sure im not hearing the whole story. It seems odd your doctor would "drop" you if there wasnt more to this story... You probably need to talk to a lawyer to get an exact answer if you really want to sue them. It sounds like it was probably an honest mistake by the pharmacy. Pharmacies usually have several thousand patients, and to be realistic its pretty much impossible to stay up on the domestic situations of each one. If they had a note on your husband, it was probably buried in the part of your profile called the DUR in which case they tech wouldnt have seen the note unless she was looking for it. I think you're also going to have to prove that your ex picked up your prescription... and even if he did, the pharmacy would be able to give you more if you had refills, though your insurance might not cover it. So yeah, you need to ask a lawyer... but IMO you dont have that much of a case... sorry about the trouble you've had though.
362389
Yes, it's okay.  I had a prescription and was caught with it...  The county I was in tried to prosecute me and failed (I even used a court appointed attny.)  If you've got a prescription from a doctor, you're good to go.  You have to know people who know people, usually others who have prescriptions will know where you can by it.  In Northern Cali, shops are widespread.  Medical is given to nearly everyone there (up north)  the further south you go, the more strict the laws get.  Each county sets up it's own rules so, check it out before hand.  Personally, I've seen people get prescriptions for nearly everything.
1052279
You need to call and talk to an attourney. Rights for mentally ill patients varies from state to state.
883450
I am not sure if you are being asked to sign that you have received the form, or to being asked to wave the HIPAA law.\n\nIn either case, if you live in a major metropolitan area, call the local lawyer referral service.  They can usually refer you to a lawyer who willl give you 20 minutes of his time free.\n\nI have furnished a link of the HIPPA law that is in layman's terms.
999014
I'm not sure if I am getting your question: Do you produce what you are selling? Like actually producing the jam you are selling??\n\nIn any case FDA needs to be sure about those products are actually healthy, that they are produced under out of pathogens standards and, well, in case they produce any kind of disease they have someone to blame for it. So it is because they have to take care of the health of the people consuming your products.\nAnd the permit would be for the products to be consumed by people, not for you selling them.\nHope you find this info useful
280543
I'm sorry to say I can't answer the question its one of the stupidest things I have heard of. Not you question, but how they can bend you over the table like that.\n\nauntb93 really there is no such nonsense in CA?  \n\nThe state where someone can sue you for cutting themselves while breaking into your house, and win.\n\nAn elderly couple in CA filed a lawsuit against their neighbor over her 5:00 a.m. baths.  She was taking a bath before work and the noise from here pipes was waking them up.  She tried the problem fixed and they still were not satisfied.\n\nA man joined a group to learn, among other things, to fly through self-levitation. Unsatisfied with the results, he claimed psychological and physical damages...and sued the group for $9 million. \n\nA woman went to her friend's house and asked for a haircut. Unhappy with her new look, she claimed her friend had willfully, intentionally, and maliciously cut her hair without her consent...and sued him for $75,000.\n\nA man was invited to his parents' house to celebrate the Fourth of July. He became intoxicated. And when one of the fireworks he brought with him to the party did not ignite, he went over to inspect it, and it exploded in his face. He sued his parents, the co-worker who sold him the fireworks and his employer. \n\nA teacher in CA got fired for having her students send letters to troops stationed in Iraq, while many teachers in CA had their students send letter to Governor Schwarzenegger on behalf of Tookie Williams without so much as a letter of reprimand.\n\nI grew up in CA and my dad made me read the whole paper before he would allow me to read the sports page.  I thought it was unfair then but today I'm glad he made me keep myself informed.  No nonsense in CA?  Don't make me laugh!
928229
You have the right to remain silent. \nAnything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. \nYou have the right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. \nIf you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government expense. \nDo you understand these rights as I have explained them to you?
324329
As to the first part of your question, I'm not sure a five year waiting period is accurate:\n\nCal Wel & Inst Code § 8100 (2006)\n\n§ 8100.  Possession of firearm by patient with mental disorder; Waiting period for patients threatening physical violence\n\n   (a) A person shall not have in his or her possession or under his or her custody or control, or purchase or receive, or attempt to purchase or receive, any firearms whatsoever or any other deadly weapon, if on or after January 1, 1992, he or she has been admitted to a facility and is receiving inpatient treatment and, in the opinion of the attending health professional who is primarily responsible for the patient's treatment of a mental disorder, is a danger to self or others, as specified by Section 5150, 5250, or 5300, even though the patient has consented to that treatment. A person is not subject to this subdivision once he or she is discharged from the facility.\n \nThat says that as soon as a person is released/discharged, the law no longer applies.  And that is for violent patients.  I can't find anything about a waiting period.  Besides, as stated above, the five year period is up, so don't sweat it.\n\nIf you do apply for a license, permit, etc, disclose everything.  You can get in more trouble for lying.