What amendment would you like to see in the Constituion?
102862
I personally would like to see a balanced budget amendment. I would also like to see an amendment that put more stringent parameters on Congress's role. Check out this site, there is a good discussion on possible new amendments.
875382
A brief web search revealed:\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution\n\nhttp://www.ustl.org/Current_Info/22nd-Amendment-text.html
762715
I would deregulate the FCC.  Place tight limits on the export of technology, and move for more open information flow.  Also eliminate the Patriot Act and other policies that may infringe on personal rights.
782299
Well, my opinion is that the document is outdated.  It's just a piece of paper,  made by men after all, and yet it is revered as if made by the hand of God.  \n\nI think it should be considered to draw up a new constitution: One that wouldn't need exhaustive amounts of amendments, and would apply to the state of affairs in 2006 versus 1776.  It could also include and merge all the standing supreme court decisions, which would allow the justices to refer to the constitution instead of court precedent, a practice I find to be admirable but not necessarily wise.  (A decision handed down in the past may nonetheless have been in error.)\n\nI realize that this is an extremely radical viewpoint.  But nonetheless I think people should consider the fact that the constitution is more symbolic now than truly effective.
70628
If you want to change the government then do so within the means of the constitution.  Make sure  you vote.
424507
A resounding yes!\n\nWe should change the name of the Bill of Rights. Considering the hilarious nick u have Una-bonger, I think u could come up with a few great ones, if you please...
562800
Fourth Amendment – Protection from unreasonable search and seizure. \nThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. \n\nFifth Amendment – Due process, double jeopardy, self-incrimination, private property. \nNo person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. \n\nSixth Amendment – Trial by jury and other rights of the accused. \nIn all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.\n\nSeventh Amendment – Civil trial by jury. \nIn suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. \nEighth Amendment – Prohibition of excessive bail, as well as cruel or unusual punishment. \nExcessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. \n\nThese are all considered "criminal ammendments".\n\nRegards,\n\nArmus
268763
Bill of Rights.\n\n(but Drama Guy's answer four below mine is the best)
514197
27\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amendments\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Five_of_the_United_States_Constitution\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
400702
constitution and Bill of rights
132968
I'd put a new president in the White House.  Preferably one with actual knowledge of what the nation and the world is going through.  And also a new Senate, a new Congress, and new Supreme Court judges.
1047162
The gay marriage amendment, whether to put discrimination against gays into the constitution.  \n\nIt was a sham, a ploy, a ridiculous waste of time to divert the public's attention from real issues that Congress should be dealing with.  \n\nLike lately, Frist introduced a bill to ban flag burning.
727365
constitution test?  You need to be more specific.
636578
1st Amendment - The limitations on campaign contributions, the prevention of being able to express personal religious beliefs in school, the assault of the ACLU against Christian expression.\n\n2nd Amendment - the numerous gun laws\n\n5th Amendment. Money (property) is being forcibly taken from me and given to other people in the form of Welfare, Social Security, Corporate Welfare, Agricultural Welfare, Medicaid, Medicare, etc. "...nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." Where is my just compensation?\n\nThen there are all the intrusions of government into private businesses and lives, regarding quotas and smoking and the myriad other unconstitutional intrusions.\n\nThe ability to grow and smoke marijuana, if I so choose. I don't need a nanny.\n\nThe list is long.
999518
Come from Constitution
1154296
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
1050354
I would form apolitical party whose intentions would be to bring a Constitutional Convention to the US\n\nThis would give the people the chance to correct the problems faced in our country and reinstate our freedoms.\n\nA re-writing of the Constitution is the best way that the American people have of ending the corruption(we could do away with lobbyist and special interest groups), and returning balance to the political system. The idea that one man in any country has as much power as the President is absurd\n                     "Power corrupts"\n\nIn my opinion we should have at least three figure heads acting as joint leaders, not only to check the power of the others but also because there are so many different ideas and perspectives in our country that there is no way that one man can encompass the whole spectrum, the American leadership should represent all of America not just the winning side.\n\nI also believe that we should place stricter regulations on the formation of laws, and that laws should be made out of absolute nessecity, not on a whim or because someone with money wants one, i also think that there should be no "pork" in any bill proposed for legislature (pork is when a bill is presented...lets say for education reform...but someone adds another section into the bill requesting...lets say amnesty for criminals...), one bill one subject.\n \nBut most importantly i believe we should hold a Constitutional Convention because it would give every person the opportunity to weigh in on the issues and we as Americans could again make some great achievements.......aside from destroying countries, and blowing shit up.........\n\nVOTE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION!!!\n\nPeace to all...now more than ever...