What  was Chester A. Arthur's impact on the world?
98372
Who the h*ll is that?
596
King Arthur really existed, but when you read the story, you will see it`s a legend, so some parts changed. The point is he really existed.
585785
Churchill was the greatest, but he did more than save the UK, he stood up to Hitler and saved Europe and the rest of the world from descending into fascism. Churchill had the courage, optimism and just plain bullheadedness to ignore Hitler's bluster. And the world is so much better today because of it. Think what would've happened if Hitler had won WW2. I don't think any of us want to go there.
753942
None. Israel, which is a holy place for the three major monotheistic faiths, is also one of the most conquered places in the world. Every civilization has proved to be temporary; Babylon fell, Persia fell, Greece collapsed, Rome fell, the Vatican lost its reigns, China and Mongolia have been crushed before, Britain has lost much influence, Soviet Union has fallen. And like my Greek teacher, I believe America is suffering its downfall and it wont reverse itself unto greatness.
259475
Go to: www.findarticles.com.\nEnter: global economy in the search box.\nDoing this search, I came up with more than 1800 articles.
622054
I believe the army air corps and navy air did far more damage than artillery of WWII. Besides the two a-bombs dropped on Japan, the carpet bombing of Dresden is a prime example of the devastation left in the wake of bombing runs. That example was played over and over again in Europe, as well as the island campaigns of the south Pacific.  Then again, naval gun fire played an awfully large part in the Pacific, so I'm going to revise my answer by saying, in Europe air power was more significant, whereas in the Pacific, artillery and naval gun fire were dominant, excluding the A-bombs of coarse.
800075
Ah, Arthur Brown & Kingdom Come, one of the most unique acts to come out of England during that time. Arthur was a truly individual entertainer & had a voice all his own. "Journey" is a favorite album by them & "Spirit Of Joy" a song I remember well.In fact , thanx alot, I know what I'm going to play this morning!!
1082199
No 1 didnt affect the whole world, it just gave us something to laugh about.\nNo 2 has devastated the whole world.
61324
THE RT. HON. OWEN SEYMOUR ARTHUR
174186
You may want to look for American imperialism and the Philippines. These web sites may help:\n\nMark Twain: Biography and Much More From Answers.comMark Twain was an avid critic of American society. ... Twain wrote an anti-war article entitled The War Prayer during the Philippine-American War. ...\nwww.answers.com/topic/mark-twain - 101k - Cached - Similar pages \n\n\nExtras ~ The War Prayer (Mark Twain) ~ About the StoryBackground notes for Mark Twain's 'The War Prayer.' ... He became, for instance, one of the most powerful critics of the new American imperialism, ...\nwww.aaronshep.com/extras/WarPrayer_note.html - 5k - Cached - Similar pages \n\nMark Twain - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaBecause he had an exclusive contract with Harper & Brothers, Mark Twain could not publish The War Prayer elsewhere; it remained unpublished until 1923. ...\nen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Twain - 75k - Cached - Similar pages \n\n\nMuch luck.\nCodially, India.Magica
384167
The Great Depression was a worldwide economic downturn, starting in 1929 and ending in the mid or late 1930s. Almost all countries were affected. The worst hit were the most industrialized, including the United States, Germany, Britain, Europe, Canada, and Japan. Cities around the world were hit hard, especially those based on heavy industry. Construction virtually ended in the United States and other countries. Farmers and rural areas suffered as prices for crops fell by 40-60%. Mining and lumbering areas were perhaps the hardest hit because demand fell sharply and there was little alternative economic activity.
208973
Some curriculums teach that Africa was the\nprimary influence in the knowledge that we\nhave today.  Certainly Egypt had an impact\non civilization, but the Greeks developed an\namazing society, some of which was lost in\nthe rise of the Roman empire and later during\nthe dark ages.  The Renaissance or rediscovering\ncentered around the Greek civilizatin instead of\nEgypt.  Much of Africa has always consisted mostly of\nscattered peoples with little widespread influence.
601438
Helping you out with your homework huh?  Well I will not make it 4 or five sentences long but will give you something to think about.  \nThe impact it has on the American history is it started the rebellion against taxation and the mother country.  The second thing is that Americans decided to govern themselves and form a new government.  It also lead to no one ruler will govern America, judicial system, legislative branch and the executive branch.  It lead to a revolt and to the rights of our civil liberties.
1024055
hmmmm. that one is tricky. but take ww2 for ex. the war was a big boost for the economy esp. since it started during the depression. it gave people jobs. and helped with the stock market. socially it wasn't so great though it did help people by boosting there moral as in getting jobs. but on the German front it was devastating to Jews and anyone the Germans persecuted. long term it ended up bringing Communism which as we all know isn't that great. so basically you are looking for anything that would be kinda like that where you could see a drastic impact on all fronts. good luck. hope i helped if not sorry.
1069414
Sounds like an educator question. ;) \n\nA GREAT page on this subject is found at\n\nhttp://apgar.net/virginia/\n\nwith both the details you ASK, as well as the *big picture* answer. :)
1133826
From the 16th century onwards, an essentially organic agriculture was gradually replaced by a farming system that depended on energy-intensive inputs. Mark Overton assesses the impact of this agrarian revolution.\n Jethro Tull ©  \n \n\n\nPage 1 of 6\n\n\n1. An enduring myth\n2. More food for more people\n3. Crop yields\n4. Farming systems\n5. More food per worker\n6. Find out more\n\n\nPrint entire article  An enduring myth\nFor many years the agricultural revolution in England was thought to have occurred because of three major changes: the selective breeding of livestock; the removal of common property rights to land; and new systems of cropping, involving turnips and clover. All this was thought to have been due to a group of heroic individuals, who, according to one account, are 'a band of men whose names are, or ought to be, household words with English farmers: Jethro Tull, Lord Townshend, Arthur Young, Bakewell, Coke of Holkham and the Collings.'\n\nThese men are seen as having triumphed over a conservative mass of country bumpkins. They are thought to have single-handedly, in a few years, transformed English agriculture from a peasant subsistence economy to a thriving capitalist agricultural system, capable of feeding the teeming millions in the new industrial cities.\n\nAll these details are in some dispute, but there is general agreement that the role of the 'Great Men' as pioneers and innovators has been exaggerated. 'Turnip' Townshend, for example, was a boy when turnips were first grown on his estate, and he could not, as the textbooks tell us, have introduced them from Hanover. Jethro Tull was something of a crank and not, as we have been told, the first person to invent a seed drill, which in any case was not used by farmers on any scale until a century after his treatise Horse hoeing husbandry was first published in 1731.\n\n'Arthur Young, the agricultural writer, has been described as a 'a mountebank, a charlatan and a scribbler'.'\nTo continue, Coke of Holkham was a great publicist (especially of his own achievements), but some of the farming practices he encouraged (such as the employment of the Norfolk four-course rotation in unsuitable conditions) may have been positively harmful. And Arthur Young, the agricultural writer, has been described as a 'a mountebank, a charlatan and a scribbler' by one author, although others see him as a proto-social scientist. Finally, Bakewell's New Leicester sheep was a success, but his Longhorn cattle were not. It seems that only the Collings brothers, who developed the shorthorn cattle breed, can escape criticism. Despite this evidence, the myths associated with these individuals have proved extremely difficult to dislodge from literature not directed at a specialist historical audience.\n\nMore food for more people\n\nA Shorthorn Bull Despite these criticisms, it is still argued that an English agricultural revolution happened in the century or so after 1750. One obvious reason behind the argument is the fact that an expanding population from this time on was largely fed by home production. In 1750 English population stood at about 5.7 million. It had probably reached this level before, in the Roman period, then around 1300, and again in 1650. But at each of these periods the population ceased to grow, essentially because agriculture could not respond to the pressure of feeding extra people. Contrary to expectation, however, population grew to unprecedented levels after 1750, reaching 16.6 million in 1850, and agricultural output expanded with it.\n\n'Low-intensity agricultural system based on fishing and fowling was replaced by a high-intensity system based on arable crops.'\nOne reason output grew was through new farming systems involving the rotation of turnips and clover, although these were part of the general intensification of agricultural production, with more food being produced from the same area of l
313441
How Capitalism Has Benefited the World