Lochness monster????????????
103088
A large water dragon from the stone age...  Thought to be green but is actually golden with its belly coated with gems and gold...
871170
i hope not, its a monster!
781584
There have been numerous people who have looked for the Loch Ness.  However, the Loch's are so deep with with hundreds of caves and tunnels exisiting off of the main body and rivers flowing freely into and out of the loch, there are numerous possible places to hide. if modern science took this long to discover an nourmous stationary vessel, is it any wonder that they also can neither support nor disprove the existance of a monster?\nIn, I believe 2003, Discovery did however, air a special with what they found, and yes, they took photos.  \n\nrecently, the remains of a viking ship wreck has been discovered underneath the dark waters of scotland's loch ness. historians, scientists, and academics are elated over the find, which may change how viking and scottish history is viewed.   \n\nsince 565 a.d., hundreds of sightings have been recorded of a monster living in or around the loch ness.  \nif it does exist, no one knows exactly what the monster is, how many of them are in the loch, or how they came to be there. \n\nas science progresses, so does the high-tech search for the loch ness monster. the loch has been mapped by sonar and radar and every underwater technique known to man. because none of these techniques has revealed evidence of the loch's habitation by nessie, sceptics are quick to point out that if nessie exists, one of the scientific techniques would have discovered her by now.\n\nand yet, for hundreds of years a gigantic ship has been laying at the bottom of the loch undiscovered and undisturbed by time or scientists until just a few weeks ago. \n \nif explorers can discover a lost viking ship in the giant loch ness, what else remains hidden in this loch in scotland
1071385
I think they were killed in the flood, but have you ever read (I think) in Job about the leviathan?  Sounds so much like a brontesaurus or dipladucas doesn't it?  People try to say it's a croc, but it's  nothing like a crocodile.  Also Psalms 74 says He lopped off the heads (plural) of leviathan, and made mincemeat of the dragon.  I'm not trying to make people believe anything, it's just one of the things I wonder.
1155145
STOP THIS NONSENSE!!! You got your El-creepo friends together again....\n\nJesus loves you so much and this is what He gets back???\n\nCan I see troll_evolution guy"s heart changing, or is this still his evil himself for contrary
992622
Try\nwww.monsters.com
320790
Well... I think we have to get our terms straight here. Frankenstein was a fictional doctor and researcher somewhere in Central Europe (perhaps what is now Romania) in a story written in France by a young British woman on a vacation which included the poets Shelley and Lord Byron. It all happened early in the 1800s, before Shelly drowned.\n\nSo, F wasn't a monster. In the story, he created a creature which was either a monster or misunderstood, depending on how you take the story. Assorted movies and other books have taken it all possible ways by now. Including one by Mel Brooks. \n\nAnd, since F supposedly lived about 1800, neither he nor the creature (fictional though they both be) were even alive (in iagination) 1 000 000 000 years ago. In fact, no humans actually lived then, nor any mammals nor reptiles nor dinosaurs nor birds no, if memeory serves, insects nor trees nor grass nor ... If there was life then, it was probably limited to micro-organisms which have left no fossils to be studied.\n\nYou might want to look up the age of the Earth to see how long ago in its life was 1 000 000 000 years ago. \n\nFrankenstein's monster (or creature or whatever) was promptly taken to be a warning about the possible downside of all that science and mechanical changes that had been occurring for more than a hundred years in 1800, and have added not only another 200 years, but sped up  up considerably since then. Many artists and writers have taken the metaphor seriously and have written quite a lot using it as an analytic tool. \n\n========\nmodern developments of science and engineering\n\nAnd indeed, the progress in our understanding of the physical universe, and our increased ability to control it which sometimes follows an increase of understanding, have brought up some new dangers. Engineering managed to produce atomic weapons after 50 years of increasing understanding of submicroscopic particles and their nature. \n\nWe are still coping with this today, more than 60 years afterwards. The effort to prevent the spread of these weapons has been slowly fraying for some time. The French, the Russians, the Pakistanis, the Indians, the Chinese, and probably both the Israelis and the South Africans, have all developed nuclear weapons, although the practicality of their various warheads and delivery systems are rather debatable. \n\nQuite a number of writers have used the Frankenstein story as an organizing motif in their accounts of the dangers and reasons for the dangers of having nuclear weapons in the hands of any nations, much less Third World nations somewhat controlled by religious or ethnic factions who may demand their use in a territorial dispute. \n\nBut, there is a problem here. Artists and writers are rarely good sources for a clear understanding of science and engineering. when they attempt to analyze and predict things scientific or engineering, they often get themselves considerably tangled up. A recent example is a spoof article written by Alan Sokal, a professor of physics at NYU, and submitted to a journal of advanced thought, Social Text. The article was well done of its type, and was complete and utter and deliberate nonsense. The editors and their reviewers couldn't see that, though, and it was accepted for publication. Sokal held a press conference announcing the hoax the day that issue of the magazine hit the street. Its editors continued for some time to defend their decision to publish it, despite the intended hoax. Their public explanations of why it was fine to publish the article even if it were a deliberate hoax are astonishing. And, if honest and not merely damage control via an attempt to guide the media spin, are evidence of rather considerable cluelessness. \n\nScience and engineering require a certain amount of intellectual apprenticeship before one becomes competent to really have an opinion. Short of that, everyone is very much as I would be if asked a question about quilting technique. Al
49543
have you ever heard of the surgeons photo im betting youve seen it well it was a hoax made up to get money they got a surgeon to help hype photo it was actually a modified toy sub.it is still the picture most think of when the name nessie is spoken
596083
yes i was in Tobago 2003 in the man of war bay. I was in a canoe.It was also my first time trying this sport. I was told no sharks come into the bay yet this one did. It was jumping out of the water rather close to me, Scared me silly. Unfortunately a few days later the local fishermen caught one. a hammer head shark. Lovely to look at but would have been better if it was alive in the sea.
143275
it's a dark water & if they put lights it might distract the lochness...\n\nand it will stop all the mystery and that was not fun anymore for the next generation.
271466
Yeah, cause it's fun to argue with people who are uptight and unwilling to think about the world just a little bit differently.  Why couldn't there be a Nessie?  Really?  Did you see some of the creatures that washed up with Katrina?  Check out ebaums world.
284146
a turdle neck ?!?!?!?
253450
An atheist was out in a rowboat, when suddenly the Loch Ness Monster surfaces, throwing his boat 50 feet in to the air.  The atheist is falling back down, and the Loch Ness Monster reaches its head up to eat him.\n\nThe atheist crys out, "Oh God!  Save me!"\n\nThe situation slows down, until the atheist realizes that time itself has stopped.  He then hears a booming voice from the clouds.  It says, "You have never believed in me.  You told hundreds of people that I did not exist.  You belittled my faithful.  And now you cry out to me.  Why should I save you?"\n\nThe atheist replied, "C'mon God...until a minute ago, I didn't believe in the Lock Ness Monster, either!"
445229
I do believe in Loch Ness monster.The Loch Ness Monster, sometimes called "Nessie" or "Ness" it is a mysterious and unidentified animal said to inhabit Loch Ness, a large deep freshwater loch near the city of Inverness in northern Scotland. Nessie is usually categorized as a type of lake monster.\n\nThe underwater photos were reportedly obtained by painstakingly scouring the loch's depths with sonar, over the course of days, for unusual underwater activity. An underwater camera with an affixed, high-powered light (necessary for penetrating Loch Ness' famed murk) was then deployed to record images from below the surface. Several of the resulting photographs, despite their obviously murky quality, did indeed seem to show an animal quite resembling a plesiosaur in various positions and lightings. A few close-ups of what is alleged to be the creature's diamond-shaped fin were also taken, in different positions, indicating movement.
970708
At first I was angered by your question, but when faced with your undeniable facts, I am left speechless. You should emphasize more that monsters do eat humans though to better to connect the dots. A Noble prizeis in your future for sure.
394256
I saw this on Animal Planet, and I can't remember it's name!  Isn't it a water bear or something?  Really kind of neat.
670603
Going to see the X-MEN!? YOU BLASPHEMOUS HAIRY BALD MAN! Yer goin' ta hell in a hand-basket. Its a cute one too! I originally purchased it for my daughter but she moved away and its gathering dust.\n\nThe plan is to force you into the basket, hook it to a cable that leads to the center of the Earth - and send you sailing down into da pits. When you hit bottom, yank three times on the cable so we'll know to fill in the hole. You're cooperation is much appreciated. Thank you.\n\n(And you said Creationalists are not polite! Shame on you)