what's the different between Camaro Z28 and the SS version?
108884
In the 1967 camaro:\n\nSS Package included modified 5.7 L (350 in³) V8 engine (first engine of that size by Chevrolet), also L35 396 in³ (6.5 L) "big block" was available. SS featured non-functional air inlets on the hood, special striping and SS badging on grill, gas cap, and horn button. It was possible to order both RS and SS packages to receive RS/SS Camaro. In 1967 Camaro RS/SS Convertible Camaro with 396 in³ (6.5 L) engine paced the Indianapolis 500 race. \n\nZ28 option code was introduced in December 1966 for the 1967 model year. This option package wasn't mentioned in any sales literature so was unknown by most of the buyers. The only way to order Z28 package was to order base Camaro with Z28 option, front disc brakes, power steering and Muncie 4-speed transmission. Z28 package featured unique 302 in³ (4.9 L) "small block" engine, designed specifically to compete in the Sports Car Club of America(SCCA) Trans Am racing series (which required engines smaller than 305 in³ (5.0 L) and public availability of the car). Advertised power of this engine was listed at 290 hp (216 kW) while actual dyno readings rated it at 360 to 400 hp (269 to 298 kW). Z28 also came with upgraded suspension and racing stripes on the hood. It was possible to combine Z28 package with RS package. Only 602 Z28's were sold. Contrary to popular belief, 1967 Z28s did not have raised cowl induction hoods like 69 Z28s did. In 1967 the optional Z28 cowl induction received air from a cowl plenum duct attached to the side of the air cleaner that ran to the firewall and truly got air from the cowl vents. The hood was a standard flat hood. 1967 Z28s had 15" Rallye wheels, while all other 1967 Camaros had 14" wheels. The Z28 could be combined with the RS appearance package.
105335
I would go with the Sentra. The Mazda may be easier to get more horsepower out of but the Sentra is a more stable buildable motor and NISMO has many racing parts for it.
722492
I suggest you inquire in SSS information booth. They surely will assist you.
670662
Try Global Spec. It's free and allows you to put in your desired torque and rpm, then shows you matching products. Keep in mind they will spam the email account you register with mercilessly.
715534
Camaro.  '67-69.  It's been awhile, so I don't remember the exact year.
408985
GM has brought out 2 different kits to up the horsepower on the Cobalts. Check with your local dealership (they have just now became available).  1 of them includes a SuperCharger.\nHypertech has a great program for the Cobalt but you have to remove the factory GM program & the Hypertech computer installs its' own program.\nThe GM kit is probably the safest bet, though. Since it has been designed specifically for the Cobalt.\nGood choice for a vehicle. I have always been a fan of the Cavalier & the Cobalt is nothing but a body style change. It is built off of the Cavalier platform & they did pretty much prefect it.\nExcellent choice for a vehicle to play around with.
39167
The STI is certainly cheaper and more luxurious than the MR.  It all depends on what you want.  The STI has been improved year after year, all in pursuit of one target, the Evolution.  Having said that, the Evo is still in the lead.  It has a stiffer chassis and higher overall performance.  Compared to a stock lancer, there are far more differences between the evo and a lancer than there are between an STI and a regular impreza.  If you look at the production based rally classes, the Evolution does a lot better than the STI in general.  It's truly a race car for the street.  \n\nHowever, the Subaru has more luxury, safety, and comfort.  If your ultimate goal is handling and performance, the MR has more overall capability.  The STI is ever so slightly lower performance, but is easier to live with on a daily basis.  Subaru as a company is also doing better than Mitsubishi, so the dealers are generally better that Mitsubishi ones.  Try both and pick the one you like best, you can't go wrong.\n\n*I own an Evo.
546304
That is a little difficult to help you with in e-mail!  What is it- Bicknell, Teo, etc.?  If you call the company that made the car they can help you.  Or get someone else with a four bar car to help you get it set up close to good and you can fine tune it for your own driving style from there.  where do you race?
235225
This is Bob writing back. Thanks for the info on the t-tops. I am currently in Shanghai, China, and the vette's in Washington state. Sorry--mine is not a pace car. Because there were so many '78 vettes built(but not THAT many Pace Cars), I decided when restoring mine to put in a 330-h.p. crate motor. It used to be that ugly vanilla creme color with red leather. It's now a candy black cherry with black leather. It's fast and a real eye-catcher.
150969
If u dont like modification, buy Subaru. \nIf u want more, buy evo8. \nI read, subaru only can reaches 550 HP in Prodrive Support, fully modified, but Evo8 in Rally Art can reaches 678 HP and If u want to use Mivec Engine, it can be more than 720 HP. It's up to u
291792
Yes, it is a 1969 Chevrolette Camaro RS Convertible. LOVE that car. Always have.
938555
Different makes, and even different models from the same manufacturer, do differ.  I know this, as I have written the software for one model.  In fact, the algorithms used are a commercial secret, guarded carefully between manufacturers.  This is also the reason I am unable to provide more data, or references.\n\nYou may be able to find them for yourself, though.  Good luck.
412173
what year chevy  it may not be much considering its only a 4.3 liter.  are you running heads and cam   what size cam?  Ported heads?   what type bolt on?  and what kind of car is it.  Are you looking at high or low end torque?   You may want to get a dyno pull
28720
The V8 Mustang GT is quicker than the V8 Monte Carlo SS.  Mustang GT does 0-60 in 5.1 seconds, the Monte Carlo SS does it in 6.0 seconds.
45741
i havent tried riding a lambo so i dont know, but i've driven a 360 challenge stradale and id say it's crazy, there's this button in the 360 that unleashes the car's full potential, it's so crazy and exciting coz everytime i make a turn i feel like my i left my head somewhere. comparing the lambo to the ferrari, i think ferrari's faster, i once read a magazine and they were comparing the diablo to the f50 and the f50's better in braking and handling by only a slight margin.
247859
Check the Vendor Classifieds on the www.nasioc.com forum.\n\nSven has very little idea what he is talking about. Of course the STi is a better car, but the WRX has a *lot* of potential. My 05 WRX running larger Deadbolt ported turbo, TBE, uppipe, header, upgraded injectors and pump, Ecutek, TMIC, pulley, and SMC alcohol injection runs 315 awhp on the conservative Dyno Dynamics (this is 400 crank hp ), and the transmission is in excellent shape with no metal filings or other damage. \n\nOf course, I don't shift like an ape like some people.\n\nThe best thing to do is read nasioc, and learn from people who know what they are talking about.
461801
I have a 72 monte (currently in restoration) and the new ones are CRAP compared to the old ones.  I have a friend who just traded in a 02 ? Monte because the trans was starting to slip.  I love chevys dont get me wrong, but if the stang is a V8 it is better as far as construction and life after miles is concerned.  As for the women thing, I see a lot of chicks driving mustangs, so if you get the stang you better trick it out if you want to stand apart from the ladies.  The monte has sexy lines, but the mechanical soundness is a turnoff.  (Dont pull up on a girl and try to talk to her if she cant hear you over the rattle under the hood) Go old school, chicks really dig that.