Is neutering a ‘Man’ inhumane?
117709
First of all, I am not sure why people confuse the words pedophile with Sex offender. A pedophile is someone with a sexual desire for a child, usually one that had not developed yet. \n\nIt has been found that many pedophiles cannot control their sexual urges. But altering their body is not exaclty constitutional. They are required to go to treatment and if there is reason to believe they are very disturbed, they are placed in a special home. \n\nBut there are many other people on the sex offender list that are not pedophiles. Some people on the list were caught urinating off the side of a boat when another boat passed by. Some were 22 year olds that dated a 16 year old with her parents permission but after a nasty breakup, someone called the cops. Some are 23 year old Frat boys that hook up at a keg party only to find out the girl is not in college yet. Are these people pedophiles? I would have to say no, not necessarily. Do they deserve to be nuetered? \n\nI think the public needs to be better educated on this subject before casting their opinions.  Otherwise, rights of all people will be taken away one by one and we will live in the society of An Eye for an Eye like in Acient times.
181274
How come people show concern about it this much?  Like some other person said, for a big number of the world male population this is normal.  I think this is one of the things that have been recorded on people's mind, I swear.  Why there is not a lot of repulsion toward the female reproductive organ.  As I see it, there are more opportunities for it to be of concern.  A lot more of skin goin this way and the other.  A cavity for breeding of all kind of nasties.  But you know, I am not concerned, because I was not taught in that belief (maybe I should)
960861
Joe, personally if it was a cute huggable  animal I would let the little fella fill his boots...but if it was something nasty like a bug I would swoosh it off....now do you want that big sqeezy hug? x\nI'm finding your Q's very taxing this morning x
508699
i generally condone castration for all convicted child molesters for 1 it would stop them from molesting anymore children for 2 it would stop them from ever breeding. better yet i think that after the castration there parts should be sewn on to there foreheads, so everyone will know these dickheads for what they are.
925777
It is said possible but practically not prooved. It has never been done completly. Only until a specific state and then it was put into a utero. Especially not with humans as it is against the human rights. But technically it it the same with every mammal. But even it has not be done I strongly belief it is possible and when not now, then certainly in a few years.\n\nGreetings Dr.Seuss
584466
I don't know, but it totally makes me sick and very sad.  :(  Two things I absolutely can not deal with are cruelty to animals and child abuse.  I learned of a case of animal abuse in my area recently, and I was severely depressed about it for two days.  I guess that a person in that mindset would have had to have been severely abused or have seen terrible cruelty in their formative years.  They are probably curious about it and desensitized to it at the same time, and violence is something that occupies their thoughts.  Maybe they are trying to reenact or work out some violent event that affected them, like a science experiment.  Whatever the reason, there's no excuse for it.  I try to be understanding and rational, but I say that these types of people should be tortured without mercy and killed, the same as their victims.
90746
No, I'd say castration is in order though.
731023
Absolutely not.  A man should be able to do what he wants with his own body.  More often it is the man who wants the vasectomy, not the woman.  A vasectomy is not castration so I don't see why anyone would consider it a loss of manhood or refer to the man as "whipped".    \n\nThe Bible says slavery is ok (Exodus 21:7, Lev. 25:44) and it also says anyone who works on the Sabbath should be put to death (Exodus 35:2).  I would like to see you fight for these as well. The Bible makes no mention of a vasectomy being prohibited.  Interpretations are a different story.\n\nThe US government will not bend for Christians every time a different interpretation of biblical scripture crops up.  The doctrine of separation of church and state prohibits this.
169264
Would you like me to stick one of your family members in a cage and shave them bald, smear untested goop on them just to see if they break out in a rash? Or hey lets just inject them with stuff and see what happens.. I wouldnt do it to a human and I dont want it happening to animals either... ther has to be a more humane way of testing things.. if it costs more or takes longer then fine I can pay more or I can wait.
525233
I think that's an excellent idea.  To an extent.  I'd go more with saying who's not aloud to breed and spaying them.  Click the link below for an example that proves my case.
991865
What sad answers.  Do you realize how unfeeling and cold your answers are.  How can you pass a law and make it OK for some doctor to puncture a hole in your babies head, suck its brains out and kill him or her and then pull the dead child out and tell me that is acceptable.  You are the same people that want to put someone in jail for being inhumane to animals.  Now I think they are both wrong but I do think the first is a sin.  That same child once it is born alive if you smothered it because you did not want it you would go to jail.  Now tell me what is the difference.  Either way it is a living human being.  A child in the womb cannot live if the mother does not take care of herself and eat properly in other wards you have to take care of it, a baby has to be taking care of by the mother or someone who cares.  They are both still life, why should it be legal to throw an unborn child away.  The funny thing is there was a man here in NC that took an animal,cut the unborn pups out and killed them the out cry was loud.  But those same people who were appalled at this would not blink when the same thing is done to a human being.  \nPlease people wake up, you should not have the RIGHT to kill a child any child.  If you do not want children use a condon, the pill, abstanance & if you get pregnant take care of that child and when it is born give it up for adoption, they at least deserve that.
1116478
I have seen some of your other questions concerning the practice of circumcision, and I totally empathize with your position on this issue. I saw a circumcision on Discovery Health Channel, and I was appalled. I had no idea it was so brutal and painful, so obviously traumatizing to the infant. I agree with you that circumcision is a practice equal to FGM, and should be addressed with the same seriousness of attitude.
756974
I believe un-domesticated animals have the right to freedom and being in a cage is not humane to them. To be taken from there origin and brought to an unfamiliar area behind bars held captive in a smaller area than there usual habitat and then to be gawked at by onlookers......No I don't think they are happy and I don't think its fair to them...
271289
sure ....id love a cloned slave \n\nbut morally correct then no ....
586459
I suggest castration with a rubberband.  Go to farm supply store and buy a bull bander.  It will be quick.  But, I don't know about painless!
1137418
I've been with both types of men, and no, there is no difference. Why would he want it now in life and not before? I would support him if he wants it done, but I would also let him know that it's a painful procedure
372546
Personally I think we should treat those cruel to animals the same.  If they beat an animal...they should be beaten.  Starved, maimed...all the same.  Humans are supposed to have a higher intellect.  Well, I sure havn't noticed it.  I view cruelty to animals as some impotent man trying to get his jollies somewhere else...