how come not 1 of the 550 reps have never taken A aids test let alone the prez....?
117483
They're too busy fugging the country to risk unprotected sex.
945493
Unfortunately, even now they are not. Anyone can make mistakes. So, electing him first time is understandable. But re-electing him is shocking. Supporting him even now is completely beyond my grasp.
146685
There is no such rule, either written or unwritten. There have only been a handful of actors or actresses that successfully run for office.
926667
Well, considering that they are not actually IN office yet, they haven't done anything.  And don't expect anything to get done.  Their "We don't need a plan" plan will go over like a hooker at a nun's convention.
291345
no one so far. even if they do, i wouold ignore them. pointless to get into a flap over such trivial things. real life's got bigger challenges.
666813
I dont think it was fair, they basically dismissed the witness completely.  The fact that he had unprotected sex with a person with HIV shows his skills as a leader. Shit they should but a shower in every city. It would be the cheapest solution to the AIDS epademic. If he was charged, there would be riots. I wonder if he's got AIDS? Heidi
593903
Like you said, they still don't know anything about government. Bill Clinton was never impeached, it takes both sides of congress to impeach a President, and it has to be by more than 75%. The Senate never impeached Bill Clinton, so this is another Republican lie. Just look at the ones on here now talking about Bill Clinton's private parts. It is sickening. Why doesn't George Bush, and the rest of the government talk about it? It's because he wasn't impeached numb-nuts!!!
1070077
AIDS originated in monkeys that's why. people didn't have sex with monkeys then.
889303
No I but I heard you were smoking crack. He wasn't one of the top runners so not likely to even BE tested. If they test the top 10 or so yeah I wouldn't be surprised, but not going to check everyone like that. Next where did YOU hear it? Come on man where is the PROOF, where is the LINK. Oh you don't have one because your brother's friend's cousin works at the testing lab. Oh and how did they get the test back this quick? Usually it takes more then A DAY to hear back, I guess they tested his specifically though at a special lab huh?
874372
Actually, NONE of these people SERVED with Senator Kerry ::sigh::\n\nBut you republictards just don't care for facts do you?
1027436
Because he doesnt have AIDS he has HIV.  And with the antiretroviral therapy that has come out in the past ten years, the disease has become much more manageable.\n\nHIV/AIDS is now 25 years old, it is able to be treated now-not ucred yet, but treated\n\nAnd to the people speaking about money and HIV/AIDS, most ,if not all, state medicaid and privatre insurances cover HIV meds.  I have yet to see one that doesn't (Im a pharmacist, I fill HIV meds every day)  And there are also federally funded programs such as HDAP (HIV Drug assitance Program) that cover copays, Ryan White Program that helps to cover others, and many manufacturers offer their products free or at low cost to the uninsured
672544
Not everyone is against him. Only those who are jealous. Regardless,of the steroid issue. Others just haven't been caught. Those ones that are pointing the finger are the ones probably under investigation or the ones that have fear of being caught have a guilty conscience. His attitude? Don't know the guy to judge him.
691067
No, he's never failed a steroids test. Conversely, he's never passed a personality test either...
685340
They probably all could pass a lie detector test. After someone has been lying much of their lives like these guys they could claim to be green with purple polka dots and the machine wouldn't catch it.
1186668
I know that for years now there has been legislature passed and then revoked for manditory AIDS testing in the US for people in high risk areas, ie. prostitutes, drug abusers, health care workers, etc.  But I dont' believe it has yet officially passed.  A few months ago I read where Bill Clinton wanted mandatory testing for high risk countries...I don't know what came of it though.  Here is the article if you want to read it.\n\nIf you have a baby now at my docs office you have to have an HIV test done.  I don't mind, I am sure there are some people out there who may not want to know, or don't want their docs to know.  \n\nThis might be a tough topic to research, but very interesting to see where you end up with it, which means it will make a good paper.  Maybe you could also research the benefits of finding out early, going through the painful treatment for it and feeling that the energy and joy has been removed from your life because the treatments are so exhausting  vs. not finding out until you are very ill, yet you had lived a happy life until then, without the painful treatement.  Either way, you end up dying eventually, right?\n\nIt's an interesting debate.  Like I said, I wonder where in the spectrum you will end up when finished.
609624
alot of them do...especially now a days.  Plus most of them get tested for aids and other STD's weekly.
906608
I won't claim to know enough about Obama to say whether he's even ready to be president,it doesn't really seem that he has the experience necessary though does it? He's pretty new at the game though. And I can't go the way of some who may answer that he won't get elected because he's black,especially when the argument is that it has something to do with conservatives trying to stop him,if liberals are so up for more minorities in office then why were the first and second black secrataries of state appointed by Bush,and why was the first Hispanic Attorney Generalappointed by Bush? And where were all the libs supporting Michael Steele when he was running for the senate. So that argument holds no water,in fact the party that was the first to try mightily to get a Black man to run for the presidency was the Republican party,unfortunately Colin Powell didn't want the job,but perhaps they can get Condelezza to run for president. Unfortunately the left couldn't even come up with the idea until they found a candidate that was "black enough" in other words liberal enough,because in the Democratic party you're not considered black unless you're also liberal.