Is Bush to blame?? Read the real question below before you answer!!!?
106305
Bush to blame? For having the strength to stand up for his convictions? To do his best to protect the citizens of this great nation when others so obviously would not? Whoever thinks so is either high or needs to move their a$$ to Canada.\n\nLet me add this: Thank God George W. Bush has the guts to stand up and defend the rights of every American wherever they may be. Obviously, there is a large percentage of Americans who will not do the same.
990846
You're right...Congress should share the blame. It's easier to get angry at one particular person and fault them instead of looking at a group of people and figuring out what to do with them. I'm again the war in Iraq and a lot of people are quick to blame just Bush for it but they need to look at the people that gave him permission to go there. Congress should be held responsible for this war just as much as Bush is.
444506
It is so funny when people blaming Bush for EVERYTHING. What's next? houses prices are too high...it's Bush, American cars are unreliable...it's Bush, or maybe...people who live in communist regimes have no rights...it's Bush, women and little girls in Vietnam are kidnapped and sold to Cambodia, Hongkong, Thailand for sex slaves everyday...it's Bush. or check this out...you don't feel good today...IT"S BUSH TOO! yeah, why not? I saw and heard people blamed Bush for hurricane Katrina, yeah they said it's because of Bush that hurricane happened!!! so why not blame your President for those? \nI'm sorry to say but blaming President Bush for gas price now is stupid.the main sources of oil are from the Mid-East, those countries there are unstable and we don't control oil industries, the OPEC does. 60% of gas we use everyday here in the States are imported, so if those countries shake up then gas price here start to jump and it will jump more in the near future. Just look at the situation in the Mid-East right now and make your best judgememts.\nGo ahead, blame your president for whatever you want. It's a free country. Well, I do not blame the President for that. I'm an immigrant who just got my US citizenship and i am very proud of it. I'm just alittle sad to know that American are not united, we are so devided that our enemies are taking advantage of it against us. Please look around with a more open mind.\nI hope I did not offend anyone here. I just say what I think.
181796
Ha ha!!!  Why not blame it on the myth of the liberal media?  The sound you hear isn't the sound of the tree falling.  It's the sound of our illustrious president's public approval rating going down another few points.  The real question is, did he set out to destroy this country, or is he doing it by accident?
1117155
You have rattled allot of folks in here.My hat off to you.If I had a choice to report the abuse yes I would choose to do so.I know many people are divided in what they choose to believe or not believe,but look at all the horrible things that have happened over the past 6 years.I believe it speaks for itself.When will we as Americans be free of the follies of the government and the Presidents who do not care about their own people.I am not just saying Bush is to blame I am stating he has become one of the many problems we face now.
933990
It seems most logical to blame those directly responsible for beginning the mess: the Bush Administration. It was they who went around mustering support for the war at the start and then went in over and above the United Nations and invaded. It would be inaccurate to blame the Democrats, they were not in power. It would be inaccurate to blame the 'Liberal Media' because there was much more talking up of the war amongst the likes of Fox etc than there were from more 'Liberal' media sources. Blaming Liberals or people in the blue states is silly for the same reason as blaming the Democrats. And to blame "Islamo Fascists" is just plain uninformed. Anyone who has any idea of the Middle East pre-9/11 and the Iraq invasion knew that Saddam and Osama were as far away from allies as they could be. Osama hated the secularist rule of Saddam in Iraq. And although Al Qaeda is not the only "Islamo Fascist" group, it is far above and beyond the power and reach of any other such group.
1025427
p.s. your question about Bush was stupid.\nWhy would you post that just to start trouble? If you don't like Bush, why post it? \nIt's not like any of these Bush haters like you and many more even know what you all are talking about anyways, you all just follow the lead and soak up all the lies from the media.\n\n\n\nIn response to the question:\n\nNo comment.
755905
They'll find a way to blame Clinton.  Bush is such a HUGE A $ $ H O L E  that he is the cause and solution.  Get rid of Bush and no problem, simple isn't it?
694534
because the president didnt listen to the people that are telling him that this is a losing battle yesterday on the abc, cbs, and nbc news, a story appeared about how bush was told, by his own hand picked generals, that the war is going badly, and he immeditaly went in to a prees conference and said the exact oppisit. bush is a perenial liar he should be shot. republicans have no one else to blame for this fiasco but themselves
252871
I bet the Liberals will blame Bush or Cheney. lol
880250
Are you blaming this on Bush because you cannot find reason to blame it on the clouds?
41739
I'm going to have to quote Sherasi here (you wrapped this up perfectly): Personally, I neither hate or love President Bush. He has been an adequate president doing nothing outstanding or terrible in either direction.  (Now here's my part).  As for the WMD's it is possible that they haven't been found.  However, and I don't think I'm speaking alone when I say this, given the tone of the Administration, the UN speech by Colin Powel and George Bush's own firey speeches, I was under the impression that the WMD posed a clear and present danger to us our or our friends in Europe (them being closer, it would be easier to get a missle there).  Therefore, even though I wasn't an avid war supporter, I did expect there to be some sort of major find (again, just because of the tone).  After these years, though it is possible that they are well hidden, the United States has sent top experts of our own (so the crack towards the UN in an earlier answer was pointless), along with spy planes, ground-penetrating radar and computer logistics simulations that could track the likely path of any movement.  I believe the weapons did exist, at one time, but were destroyed or moved.  The fact that the supposed weapons haven't been found then should NOT be seen as a 'victory' for Democrats or a 'defeat' to Republicans.  It should, if we go on the premise that Bush was telling the truh, be a cause of great alarm:  Where are these weapons? Could enemies be plotting against us right now?  It is very sad (and alarming) how even something as overtly destructive as biotoxins suddenly becomes political in this toxic political atmosphere.  And to address you additional comment, if the weapons are one day found, I would hope that the 'Bush haters' say "It looks like we made a mistake".  However, you and I and everyone here knows d*mn well that we're not that forgiving in America, and that - unfortunately - is the reason many foreign policy blunders (and that's aimed at all Presidents, not just Bush) go not only unapologized for, but are compensated by compoundingly disastrous steps.
166734
No one has been held responsible, and in fact Bush stole another election AFTER this unjust war was started.  We need to educate people and demand a revolution.  With something like 2400 US casualties now, the "collateral" Iraqui dead(women, men and children who are not insurgents, were just in the wrong place at the wrong time. . .this number is, as George Bush put it, "around 30, 000 more or less."\n\nIf you are not outraged, then you are NOT paying attention!!!"
1124000
Yes, that's just like us Democrats, blaming Bush for EVERYTHING.\n\nIncidentally, Nuke, which of the following do you think Bush had nothing to do with?:\n\nGuantanamo Bay \nWiretapping\nLies to America about Iraq's nuclear capabilities and intentions\nThe Iraq War\nAmerica's Failed Energy Policy\nThe Deficit\nThe Debt\nWorldwide Anti-Americanism\n\nDamn...I'm tired of typing. Tell you what, take a shot at these, and then I'll give you the next 20.
526848
Okay, first about the comment above mine about Bush. It is mainly not Bush's fault that this country is in such a mess. It is our own personal doing, we are just too irresponsible to accept that. So don't give me that bull about Bush. You try running a country. Okay. Now to answer the question.\n\nI think that the problems in the US are a whole lot bigger than just money. Yeah, the first step is having money to help, but what we really need is a change on our general outlook on life. We Americans are for the most part very selfish, self centered, and ignorant. If somehow we could somehow all change our values and not consider worldly possesions of so much importance, then we could change the country and make a larger change than money could do. However, since it is technically impossible to do so, if you really want a change, focus on how you bring your children up. My parents did an excellent job bringing me up. Not having a TV, I have grown up entertaining myself by reading and inventing games in my spare time. They have influenced me with the best of their own personal values, which helped me stay out of a lot of the trouble kids got into when I was younger. That is what I think should be done.
349771
Remember this rule:  If it's bad, it's Bush's fault.  If it's good, it's because Bush ignored it and didn't mess it up.  Of course, this rule is thrown out the window when there's a Democrat in the White House, because as we all know, only Republicans can be bad.  Enjoy the Kool-aid.
308737
YES and YES. And as far as your BUSHERJERK, he IS the blame for it.