What do you think about iran & U.S.A war?will it be hapen ?
109426
Not going to happen. Europe and the US going to war with Iran is a possibility.
440338
no cuz we dont have enough troops and money to start a war with Iran. but with Bush we never know what he will do next, like a drunk guy, you never know were he will stumble to.
1088683
mark my words, if we go to war with iran... WE WILL LOSE\n\nThey may not have the technology we have. They may not be a sophisticated militarily as us. \n\nBut they have over 1,000,000 people ready to strap on bombs and take the war to our soldiers and our homeland.\nAnd that is no bull$h!t\nMany of there people have already told there president that they will do "whatever is needed to defeat the bully" known as the U.S.\n\nWe are not talking about soldiers here. We are talking about civilians with families who are prepared to die.\nWe can not defeat that.\n\nJust ask the former Soviet Union.
331039
Definately.  The war in Iraq isn't going that well for us, and Iran is a bigger, more powerful country.
304758
One sincerely hopes that a war between Iran and the US never breaks out. But judging from the way things are turning out, war is a very real possibility. If war does break out:-\nThere will be heavy casualties on both sides. However, Iran will have to eventually concede defeat, or be wiped off. Though Iran has a large military force, it is largely antiquated and their might is still nowhere compared to what the US and its allies can bring to bear. All Iran's confident rhetoric and talk is only for public consumption and is actually to pep up their own troops and countrymen. Though it may have acquired weapons and delivery systems through its clandestine programme, their true capabilities are still suspect. Remember, both Saddam and the Taliban also behaved with similar over-confidence and arrogance before the conflicts began and in the initial stages.\nAlso, the US will not be alone. They will have allies as most of the developed nations consider Iran a rogue state, and will either back the US or at least tow their line. While many think the entire Moslem/Arab world will unite behind Iran, I feel that may not happen. Remember Iran is not an Arab nation. Deep down, there are significant differences simmering between the Sunni Arab states and largely Shiite Iran. While there will be rumblings of opposition to US action, I doubt any Arab state will cast their lot with Iran when it comes to taking up arms and actually fighting. Some independent militia groups might though.... Also, commercial considerations carry weight and siding with the US or being mute spectators is best for the Arab world in the long run. For the US, the key is to keep Israel out of the conflict. Iran will surely strike at Israel and if Israel retaliates, then Arab nations may offer support to Iran. Therefore, Israel should be kept out of action and protected from an Iranian strike at all costs. \nOne thing is certain, a war like this could escalate into a global one and any war there will alter the geo-strategic and economic balances in the region.
348487
At this point, it looks like Iran will have to strike first.  Americans don't have the fortitude to start another war.
145192
Prepare yourself for the unthinkable: war against Iran may be a necessity. Will it be doomsday. i think not, unless Iran becomes a nuclear power.\n\nTHE UNIMAGINABLE but ultimately inescapable truth is that we are going to have to get ready for war with Iran.  Confronted with nightmarish perils we instinctively choose to seize the opportunity to blame Bush and the right, cursing our domestic opponents for the situation they’ve put us in. \n\nThe rapidly intensifying crisis with regard to Iran exemplifies the phenomenon. \n\n While we were chasing phantom nuclear weapons in Mesopotamia, next door Iran was busy building real ones. Now we are enfeebled, militarily and politically, our diplomatic tools blunted beyond repair by the errors in Iraq. \n\n All that matters now is what we do. \n\nThe unavoidable reality is that we now need urgently to steel ourselves to the ugly probability that diplomacy will not now suffice: one or way or another, unconscionable acts of war may now be unavoidable. \n\nThose who say war is unthinkable are right. In the nuclear age, no one wins.  Military strikes, even limited, targeted and accurate ones, will have devastating consequences for the region and for the world.\n\nA war, even a limited one, will almost certainly raise oil prices to recession-inducing levels, as Iran cuts itself off from global markets. The loss of Iranian supply and the already stretched nature of production in the Arab world and elsewhere means prices of $150 per barrel are easily imaginable. Military strikes will foster more violence in the Middle East, strengthen the insurgency in Iraq and Afghanistan, fuel anti-Western sentiment among Muslims everywhere and encourage more terrorism against us at home. \n\nAll true. All fearfully powerful arguments against the use of the military option. But multiplied together, squared, and then cubed, the weight of these arguments does not come close to matching the case for us to stop, by whatever means may be necessary, Iran from becoming a nuclear power. \n\nThe refusal of the current Iranian leadership to accept the Holocaust as historical fact is simply a recognition of their own plans to redefine the notion as soon as they get a chance (“Now this is what we call a holocaust”). But this threat is only, incredibly, a relatively small part of the problem. \n\nIf Iran goes nuclear, it will demonstrate conclusively that even the world’s greatest superpower, unrivalled militarily, under a leadership of proven willingness to take bold military steps, could not stop a country as destabilising as Iran from achieving its nuclear ambitions. \n\nSomething short of military action may yet prevail on Iran. Perhaps sanctions will turn their leadership from its doomsday ambitions. Perhaps Russia can somehow be persuaded to give them an incentive to think again, perhaps people will let by gones be by gones and live happily ever after. But we can’t count on this optimistic scenario now. And so we must ready ourselves for what may be the unthinkable necessity.
364449
I agree with you completly. Our Gov't is ready for war whenever. It is just ridiculous that they are tying to start stuff with the USA. I mean just look at us in Iraq, they don't let us inspect their country for nukes and we attack. Iran is pratically starting a war with us and I bet you that we will attack them before the next presidential election.
470312
I don't think USA can afford another war. Iran has a pretty good military force, but US can defeat them. Just that it's going to cost lots of money and many soldiers will die. So I do not agree we should wage war on Iran now. We still facing problems in Iraq and new problems are now arising in Afghanistan. \n\nI think US should focus on helping the refugees in Darfur Region in Sudan. There's evidence of genocide over there and its time to stop the killing.
288874
World War III will happen and the world will suffer!\n\nI am more uncomfortable with Israel having nukes than Iran. Iran wants a deterent from America and its Allies invading them for their oil like we did in Iraq. Yes, Saddam is an asshole and deserves to die but he was never a real threat to us. I don't believe in Bush's answer of we attack to protect freedom and save innocent people...blah blah blah. If that were true then we would have invades China, North Korea or many of the countries in Africa and South America because these goverments are also killing innocents and crushing freedom but there NO OIL THERE for us to take or the country in question can fight back.
451961
The arguments against a war are formidable.    Those who say we shouldn't send our boys (and girls) to some far off land to die are right.  Those who say war will increase Middle East violence are right. Those who say war is unthinkable are right.\n\nMilitary strikes, even limited ones, will have devastating consequences for the region and the world.\n\nAll the arguments are fearful and powerful. But taken together, squared, then cubed, they don't come close to matching the case to stop a rogue leader from acquiring nuclear power...especially one espousing apocolyptical Islamic fundalmentalism.\n\nIf Iran gets safely and unmolested to nuclear status, it will be a threshold event up there with the coming of Hitler and the Bolshevik Revolution.\n\nAm i ready for another war?  Not really, but i guess we must steel ourselves for the UNTHINKABLE NECESSITY.
581275
I don't think Iran should be invaded by the U.S. because if you notice, this is why the United States is facing so many problems now-they've been trying to invade too many countries and change them into a replica of us!  Have you noticed that ever since Bush came into office our country has been plagued with so many hardships.  Lives are lost unnecessarily and gas prices are ridiculous! The U.S. should leave Iran (and any other country for that matter) alone! Can we please just have some peace and get along?!
512588
Right now we are heading to a war in Iran if Iran keeps up with WMD's.  A war on Civilisation is still verry unlikly the U.S. never had a war like that before.
359918
It will be like sticking your hands in a wasp's nest.  You certainly can't say with certainty what will happen, but most likely it won't be good.\n\nThe unusual thing about IRAN is that its young progressive population is also anti-west.  These are not the camel-riding people you think of that hate the West.  These are young intellegent individuals and given a common enemy I don't think would be good for anyone (including Iran).
327406
Personally .. \n\ni think Americans wouldnt even bat an eye,, I think we are so removed from the fragility of life that war to us is all about Heroes and Freedom and Honor.. Just words... the truth is war brings death and bloodshed.. no honor there, doesnt matter what you are fighting for.. (no disrespect to those who have lost loved ones in any campaigne, my sympathies)\n\nHaving said that sometime we do have to stand up for ourselves.. of late though we seem to be doing it on a whim. Of late it seems that we look more for a reason to go to war then for a reason to avoid it..pre-emtive strikes dont save lives... regardless of how accurate the threat assesment may be or have been.. they will be deaths in launching the premtive strike and what happens if the threat was over stated or frabricated for a different agenda?\n\nWith Iran I think we would open the biggest can of worms ever.. I doubt it will come to that though (war).. or atleast i hope so... A few years ago a report on the middle east highlighted Iran with its large youth popullation as the most likely to become fully democratic and open stronger ties with the west.. And most experts on the region will tell you the Iraq war and the images of civilian casualties and buse has turned the tide.. They have elected the most radical leader they could find and seem to have developed a renewed animosty to the west.. \n\nThe idiotic thing is, we keep telling other nations that they cant have Nukes and that their nations are a liability and here we are not only in possession of nukes but actually doing research on new nuclear weapons while we have a mad man at the helm who has already proven that he will not hesitate to go to war (faulty intelligence or not)\n\nWe are making mistakes in our foriegn policy and we have been for a while and in doing so we are creating some of the problems that we will ourselves have to contend with in the future. Ironically with the middle east if you look into the history of the region you will see cycles of western betrayal, force and exploitation, the French, the British and U.S.. They honestly have no reason to want to work with us and we are doing everything we can to make sure it stays that way.  \n\nNot sure if many of you remember Donald Rumsfeld Attacha' to Iraq in the 1980's calling Saddam a fine gentlman and actually supporting and assiting him in his weapons build-up against Iran. Or the fact that we armed the Mujaihadeen... who today make up a large part of Al-Quida.. \n\nAnd how do we know that the civilian casualties we call colatarol damage or the price of freedom, or casualties of war.. will not lead surviving family to turn to terrorism to evange those that have died in this conflict.\n\nSee what everyone has forgotten is, that it is not so much who Osama Bin Laden is or what these terrosists want or how we can kill them.. but rather how are a few really, really evil people able to mobalize so many to the point of suicide attacks.. what is it that makes them believe.. that is what we need to tackle.. and they hate our freedom is the most idiotic attempt at explaining this.. \n\nTerrorism is the most effective form of war far.. we ourselves used it in the war of independence (Gorrila warfare is a form of terrorism, so was the malitia tactics).. and you will also find that whenever a people are faced with a power greater then their own they turn to terrorism.. that does not make it right.. but the question is simple what are we doing wrong... \n\nThey hate our freedom.. do you really believe that ... ?\n\nbloody mess.
345177
The us is already at war with iraq and terrorism mainly. if we were to go to war with iran our problem would be multiplied by a catastrophic amount possibly leading to world war three.\n\nI also disagree with the person right before me it is a problem to every one . iran will want to use those weopons on the first person that pisses them off they are a ticking time bomb.
367237
It will be a deep impact for USA. The united states will go to boggy!\nNo I don't mean that Iran is a powerful state. USA is very powerful and USa can beat Iran however, a war eating of the source of  a country. And many people in the world will hate USA. It is not good for American people:(