who won the case Marbury vs Madison?
111063
Marbury lost and the government won in the personage of Madison.\n\nIn 1804 a judicial decision was handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court in a case known as Marbury v. Madison. The case was started because President Jefferson did not like one of the appointments made by his predecessor in the Presidency, John Adams. The appointment, made in the last few hours of Adams' administration in 1801, elevated a man named William Marbury to the position of justice of the peace. Jefferson asked his Secretary of State, James Madison, to dismiss Marbury, and Marbury sued the government in the person of Madison so that he might be reinstated in his job. The case went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which dismissed Marbury's suit, stating that the court lacked jurisdiction in the case. More importantly, the Supreme Court declared that a section of the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional. This was the first time that the Supreme Court declared an act of Congress invalid, which opened a new role for the court, eventually gaining for it an important place as the third, co-equal branch of government, along with the Congress and the Executive.
72900
Al Gore.  Bush did win the electoral college.  What is interesting is the supreme court decisions in the bush v gore, the final one that ended it.\n\nIf you get a chance ever to read it its fascinating.  Essentially the arguement is made by the majority of justices that they aren't going to redo the vote in florida cause the discerning the intent of the voter is creating inequities amougnst the voters.\n\nIts the most fascinating thing from that whole era.  That and the "dont get snippy about it" from that night.\n\nI just read the supreme court case like two weeks ago.  Fascinating part and era of our history.
361786
One team is loaded with guards..and the other team is loaded with big men.  It really depends on the tempo of the game.  In a running game, I would think Team 1 would win.  In a half-court set, I would think Team 2 would win.
573808
FINALS:\n\nMavericks vs. Heat
1021782
Looks like 9-0\n\nBURGER, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which WHITE, BLACKMUN, POWELL, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. WHITE, J., post, p. 570, and POWELL, J., post, p. 571, filed concurring opinions. BRENNAN, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which STEWART and MARSHALL, JJ., joined, post, p. 572. STEVENS, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, post, p. 617. [541]
267597
George Mason just played better.  This was like a home game for George Mason, and home court always has the advantage.  \nI'm a Shockers fan however.
42919
comes from Marbury v. Madison.  It gave the court the right to decide the constitutionality of a law
400901
its reported that steve nash won.\n\n\nespn.com
178935
BLACKMUN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which WHITE, STEVENS, O'CONNOR, and SOUTER, JJ., joined. SCALIA, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, post, p. 623. KENNEDY, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which REHNQUIST, C. J., and THOMAS, J., joined, post, p. 628.
344539
I gotta agree with drewhaer.  The Pistons aren't going to risk injury at this point, while Washington needs to play to keep the fifth seed.  I think Washington will win.
1059702
Jordan... VC's dunks have all been improved on. Dr J was a great dunker, but Jordan can alwayz one up him, Dawkins wouldnt win, he was too big on power dunks, Nique lost to Jordan, Kobe only won one dunk contest, and it was a crappy one. Spud Webb only won because he is so short, just like that 5'9" guy who won this last one.
907250
RR and Chef Bartoli won by a good margin.\n\n.
459597
Pistons Vs. Mavericks\n\nMavericks win (4-3)
864464
Marbury v. Madison.  But the fact is, the Tenth Amendment was then and has been violated with this "supremacy."  The federal jurisdiction was supposed to be limited to those powers granted in the Constitution.
192614
He ruled in favor of Marbury.  This is a landmark case because it was the beginning of the practice known as judicial review-  \nthe supreme court takes on the responsibility of determining the constitutionality of goverment actions.
118516
No, Stacy should of won.  \nShe was by far the best!   The injury was the only thing that kept it close.
1004096
My heart says Ken, my head says Tito. Hopefully Ken can pull out a victory. That would really rock. I don't like Tito and his big basketball head (Tait from Uf 3).\n\np.s. Forrest Griffin should have won the fight between the two.