how labour productivity affect the production possibility frontier?
99030
labour productivity increase results in increase in output per labourer....thus leading to production possibility frontier
502989
Good question if worded correctly. Industry's value works twofold.  First, technology reduces unit cost which allows for a lower market price resulting in increased demand.  Second, the value added by the worker results in higher wages.  The money multiplier in a free market economy has to be higher than command economies (because of efficiency) so wealth creation is enhanced greatly.  \n\nBut that doesn't explain everything going on.  Industry tends to bureaucracy because of the size of operation.   Economies of scale also end up in diseconomies of scale.  Demand changes which can have negative long term impact.  (Domestic car producers today)  Too much labor of the labor market in industry results in boom bust cycles that result in large economic swings.   (Recently, the US has seen good growth without corresponding serious downturns.  Is it higher percentage of labor market in service sector, Fed policy, low tax rates, budget deficits?\n\nUltimately, free markets determine the real answer to your question.  But, increased efficiencies and outsourcing industry sector jobs have not harmed the economy here if you measure that by the aggregate and macro numbers.
531827
I am not too sure abt the levels//\n\nit depends on various parameters like FDI, balance of payments and trade deficit/surplus, the external borrowings..
461246
the basic economic factors that influence any industry (which is what plays into the location of plants and how the economy is doing in that area) plus the cost of things related to manufacturing paper--i.e. the cost of raw goods such as trees.  there are also transportation costs associated with getting the raw materials to the plant (presuming they don't make the paper right where they chop down trees)...which means they're probably affected by gas prices (which influence all transportation)...that's really all I can think of for now.
692275
Both are inter-related and it is difficult to separate. Concentrating on production is essential to run the business profitably which doesn't mean that you should concentrate only on production.  Unless the employees are satisfied with the working conditions provided by their employer, they cannot get a better out-turn from their employees.  Provision of better working atmosphere, amenities which includes employees' welfare measures are all part of the employers' concentration on their products only and we need not view them separately.  On the otherhand, if the employer is concentrating only on their production ignoring the welfare of the employees, it would amount to nothing but exploitation.
37437
Education will effect the supply of productive labour.  For example, if a firm needs scientists & engineers, but workers' average education is only a high school degree, than - for that firm -- they are not in the labour supply.  I'm sure there are more factors, but that's just what comes to mind.
860898
advantages - more workers etc.\ndisadvantages - more people with less space (the cities expand onto the agricutlural land) and more food (agricultural products, for more people) have to be produced on the smaller space of land. in general, more people with less space for food. also the more people create more pollution.\n\nhope that helped! xox good luck!
894821
You need to ask a more specific answer.  Do you mean area or economic size?  Please ask again, but clearly state your actual question.
666479
The Hawthorne effect would lead to higher productivity from having a less restrictive work environment.  This happens as long as the small group knows what is going on.
980499
You'd probably also need to consider two other factors, which are labor force growth and inflation.  If you assume that both are 0%, then if GDP growth = productivity growth, unemployment rate (and really total employment) would stay constant
342552
Review the productivity of your workers. Find areas where you are not getting returns on your business investment. Look for new technologies and products that could reduce the cost of producing your product.
1059059
That question that u have asked is a very important now a days in decision making. Because lot of people are making wrong decision simply because they are not aware of that.\nTo make or buy u have to make an analysis that is called "Break even analysis". In that analysis u have to make the costs in two groups one is fixed costs and the other is variable costs.\nIf u have already recovered the fixed costs and u r going to sell further units than u can sell ur product. But there are certain limitations that u have to look after.\nThe advantages of making a product are to utilise the production capacity of machinery and the labour.\nThe disadvantage of making a product is that if ur cost of making a product is more than the price that is available in market than u have to change ur decision.
1121923
to see the production levels over a certain period of time
1136621
Its Macroeconomics... its cheaper to produce goods/ services in Mexico as it is a less developed country. \n\n In Mexican a worker gets paid 50 cents per hour (example), whereas in the USA a worker gets $15 an hour and they both do the same job and the same work at the same standard of quality. \n\nLarge corporations in the USA that compete on a global level have to realise the loss of money they have in wages, they move to less developed countries to gain a competitive advantage, so they can produce more of their product for less and hopefully sell it cheaper (not always.... Economies of Scale).\n\n A real life example is General Motors sacking thousands of workers this year that work in their USA manufacturing departments and planning to build a new plant in China.\n\n Giddy Up!!
666447
In investing, there is such a thing as the "Efficient Frontier" of portfolio mixes.\n\nThe resultant graph is a parabolic curve on its side. The base of the parabola is ont he Y axis. This is used every day in investment firms and Wall street-ites. Very real example.
699486
I'm pretty sure it means industrial production output.
515691
Efficiency so as to be productive by using as little as needed. Consistency so as the productivity keeps rolling without having to increase costs at all or hardly at all.\nJob growth year by year without hardly raising the amount needed to train employees.