Theorically, what force could stabilize a trip through a wormhole?
99850
I don't think any force would stabilize a trip through a wormhole.
771291
A wormhole is (like a blackhole) a theory based on substantial evidence.\nIn physics, a wormhole is a hypothetical topological feature of spacetime that is essentially a "shortcut" through space and time. A wormhole has at least two mouths which are connected to a single throat. If the wormhole is traversable, matter can 'travel' from one mouth to the other by passing through the throat. While there is no observational evidence for wormholes, spacetimes containing wormholes are known to be valid solutions in general relativity.\n\nThe term wormhole was introduced by the American theoretical physicist John Wheeler in 1957.\n\n"This analysis forces one to consider situations..where there is a net flux of lines of force through what topologists would call a handle of the multiply-connected space and what physicists might perhaps be excused for more vividly terming a ‘wormhole’."\n\n—John Wheeler in Annals of Physics
1057662
I-LIKE-A-DA YO-YO!!\n\nshort version:\n\nneutrons & protons have arcs of electricity between them. or, "strings"\n\nstrings sometime break off and just disapear.\non occasion, a rouge string will become a worm hole (about a 20-25% chance)\nvery rarely, a wormhole will become a "membrane" or a small pocket of energy. (4-8% chance from worm hole stage)\n\nthe thoery is that these membranes, or "branes" for short(mem"brane"), colected together to eventualy form a bubble of energy the size of a universe. and that two of theses monsters slamed into each other to create the "big bang" theory we know today.\n\nyep, still a nerd.\n\nStargazer.
1049976
Another string theory, \nG – hmm, \nwhy not then a G-string theory?\n\n\nCurios question it is. Let us as assume that you will put a geosynchronous satellite at about 300km from the center of the Earth. Since it is a geosynchronous satellite it will stay with the same point on the Earth say over your house.  The air resistance will be minimum as I‘ll assume that the planets atmosphere stays with the planet. Here are some numbers:\n\nEarth rotates at Ve= 1,700 km/hour (diameter ~13,000 km)\nOur geosynchronous satellite Vs= ~40,000 km/hour (at 300,000 km above center of the Earth)\nThis was just to show off, now let us do some serous computation.\n\nAnd the weight of the string say at 1gm/meter will weigh …. will weigh about 126.87 kg by employing the inverse square law of gravity.  (These were very tough computations).\nThat will apply a force of about 1,300 N on that satellite.  Why apply a steady pull? The weight of the string will bring the satellite down.\n\nThe daunting question is how are we are going to attach one end of that string to the satellite in the first place and then getting the other end to your house ;)? Or perhaps…\n\nThanks for all the fish
878573
You wanted a serious answer so here goes.\n\nWhat you ask is impossible to put into practise. It is impossible under Einsteins theory for anyone to travel at the speed of light.\n\nSimply put I will try to explain why,, as you approach the speed of light matter expands or rather the mass does. According to the research , the speed of light would produce infinite mass so it is impossible to travel at that speed.\n\nThat's were the theory of worm holes came about, by creating a rip through space you can jump if you like from one point to another, crossing several light years of travel in an instant. But as you have made use of a warp in space itself you don't actually go the speed of light.\n\nSo basically, you cannot answer your question,, I can see were you get this idea from though as it is true that the faster an objects velocity is, the slower time passes for that object.\n\nThis was proven some 50 years ago by use of atomic clocks on a plane, one flew round the world while the other remained in London. When they were brought together it was noted that time passed slower for the moving clock.\n\nHope this helps.
369948
I think you should ask-"since this is my last quesion, what should I ask?"  In fact, you have hemmed all of us in a terrible logical warp from which we cannot escape...  \nI have only recently escaped from the last logical wormhole I got stuck in (cause I fell asleep)-here it is:\n\n\nThis statement is a lie.  True or false?
659614
In order to get better responses, you will need to more specific and explain what you mean by that "question".\n\nThe first thing that came to my mind was centripetal force which maintains circular motion.  Without centripetal force, the object would not be in circular motion (thus linear motion).
24039
Good question, probably travel through time and space.  Remember that boundary conditions are important for string behavior. Strings can be open, with ends that travel at the speed of light, or closed, with their ends joined in a ring.\n   One of the particle states of a closed string has zero mass and two units of spin, the same mass and spin as a graviton, the particle that is supposed to be the carrier of the gravitational force. Now that you have this information, take it and run with it.  Let me know what you find out.  Just kidding, good luck finding a solution.
599123
yes it do.\n\nIn physics, a wormhole (also known as Abbreviated Space) is a hypothetical topological feature of spacetime that is essentially a "shortcut" or "abbreviation" through space and time. A wormhole has at least two mouths which are connected to a single throat. If the wormhole is traversable, matter can 'travel' from one mouth to the other by passing through the throat.\n\nThe name "wormhole" comes from an analogy used to explain the phenomenon. If a worm is travelling over the skin of an apple, then the worm could take a shortcut to the opposite side of the apple's skin by burrowing through its center, rather than travelling the entire distance around, just as a wormhole traveller could take a shortcut to the opposite side of the universe through a hole in higher-dimensional space.\n\nThere is a compact region of spacetime whose boundary is topologically trivial but whose interior is not simply connected. Formalizing this idea leads to definitions such as the following, taken from Matt Visser's Lorentzian Wormholes:\n\nIf a Lorentzian spacetime contains a compact region Ω, and if the topology of Ω is of the form Ω ~ R x Σ, where Σ is a three-manifold of nontrivial topology, whose boundary has topology of the form dΣ ~ S², and if furthermore the hypersurfaces Σ are all spacelike, then the region Ω contains a quasipermanent intra-universe wormhole. \nCharacterizing inter-universe wormholes is more difficult. For example, one can imagine a 'baby' universe connected to its 'parent' by a narrow 'umbilicus'. One might like to regard the umbilicus as the throat of a wormhole, but the spacetime is simply connected.\n\n\n\nIntra-universe wormholes connect one location of a universe to another location of the same universe(in the same present time). A wormhole should be able to connect distant locations in the universe by bending spacetime, allowing travel between them that is faster than it would take light to make the journey through normal space. See the image above. Inter-universe wormholes connect one universe with another [1], [2]. This gives rise to the speculation that such wormholes could be used to travel from one parallel universe to another. A wormhole which connects (usually closed) universes is often called a Schwarzschild wormhole. Another application of a wormhole might be time travel. In that case it is a shortcut from one point in space and time to another. In string theory a wormhole has been envisioned to connect two D-branes, where the mouths are attached to the branes and are connected by a flux tube [3]. Finally, wormholes are believed to be a part of spacetime foam [4]. There are two main types of wormholes: Lorentzian wormholes and Euclidean wormholes. Lorentzian wormholes are mainly studied in semiclassical gravity and Euclidean wormholes are studied in particle physics. Traversable wormholes are a special kind of Lorentzian wormholes which would allow a human to travel from one side of the wormhole to the other. Sergey Krasnikov tossed the term spacetime shortcut as a more general term for (traversable) wormholes and propulsion systems like the Alcubierre drive and the Krasnikov tube to indicate hyperfast interstellar travel.
682072
No one to date has been able to create a wormhole although mathematically it should be possible there are many reasons why it is very improbable. Firstly a wormhole theoretically would decay supremely fast and to counteract this you would need an enormous quantity of negative energy to keep this open. For a wormhole of one meter you would need about as much energy as the sun has produced in its lifetime. Secondly there is no known way to create a wormhole. A wormhole theoretically is when you twist space time and you can connect two distant points with no space in between them. As of right now wormholes are just a weird concept that arises out of messing with einstein's relativity equations.
407008
Only non-fluids will keep their shape.  If the energy of the constituent particles is not sufficent to overcome the bonding then the mass will keep its shape unless a large force is applied to it.  If the gravitational force is large enough it will most certainly brake objects; would you like to try walking past a black hole?
609869
Aliens travel through wormholes, meaning they don't fly long distances to get to earth. \n\n"Intra-universe wormholes connect one location of a universe to another location of the same universe(in the same present time). A wormhole should be able to connect distant locations in the universe by bending spacetime, allowing travel between them that is faster than it would take light to make the journey through normal space. See the image above. Inter-universe wormholes connect one universe with another [1], [2]. This gives rise to the speculation that such wormholes could be used to travel from one parallel universe to another. A wormhole which connects (usually closed) universes is often called a Schwarzschild wormhole. Another application of a wormhole might be time travel. In that case it is a shortcut from one point in space and time to another. In string theory a wormhole has been envisioned to connect two D-branes, where the mouths are attached to the branes and are connected by a flux tube [3]. Finally, wormholes are believed to be a part of spacetime foam [4]. There are two main types of wormholes: Lorentzian wormholes and Euclidean wormholes. Lorentzian wormholes are mainly studied in semiclassical gravity and Euclidean wormholes are studied in particle physics. Traversable wormholes are a special kind of Lorentzian wormholes which would allow a human to travel from one side of the wormhole to the other. Sergey Krasnikov tossed the term spacetime shortcut as a more general term for (traversable) wormholes and propulsion systems like the Alcubierre drive and the Krasnikov tube to indicate hyperfast interstellar travel."
148250
We *are* traveling through time as we speak. We travel through time at a little less than the speed of light.\n\nFor every meter per second we move, we move a meter per second slower through time. Thus if we were to get in a spaceship and travel at half the speed of light through space for an extended period, then we would be moving through time at approximately half the speed at which everyone on Earth would be.\n\nWhen we returned to Earth and left our spaceship, we would discover that everyone else had aged twice as much as we did. So it is possible for us to travel into the future at a rate faster than one second per second, but it requires an extraordinary amount of resources. Consider that given Einstein's calculations to be true, the largest time displacement humanity has yet reached would be somewhere at about a second (set by whoever's been in space the longest, because in orbit you're traveling at 17,500 mph).\n\nTraveling to the past is impossible now, although we maybe be able to temporally distort a wormhole, allowing travel back to the time that the wormhole was first distorted; however this is yet to be proven or tested. We currently have no way of "grabbing" a black hole and moving it through space.\n\nI hope this helps.
519456
There are some strange solutions to Einsteins field equations which some theorists claim to offer the possibilty to travel backwards in time but these are pure hypothesis.\n\nFor one of these possibilties you would need a huge amount of "strange matter" which we yet even don't know what it is exactly, other of these hyothesis would allow to travel back in time, but not past the invetion of the thime machine, since this time machine is the "exit" on the other side of the "time tunnel".\n\nOther scientists say it will never be possible, for varios reasons, one of the most mentioned is the problem with causality (althogh there are again theories that that would't be a problem) another very funny one is by Stephen Hawking: There never will be time machines, becaus if it would we would see tourists from the future all the time.\n\nSo, seriuosly, don't expect to see a working time machine during your lifetime.
209689
mass in motion stays in motion unless disrupted by another force!
19921
It's not known whether it is possible or not.  And until our theories of the universe become actual laws, we can't say for sure.  For a "wormhole" to exist, there needs to be a tear in the fabric of space time.  Einstein's theories of general relativity say this is impossible, but Quantum Mechanics say these tears happen often.\n\nString theory gives some ideas on how these tears don't get out of control.  The prior Answer gives a good source, you can actually watch a video on it. (view sources)\n\nHowever, this sort of stuff is way out there right now for Physics.
473562
Well, as far as we know, all the matter that gets sucked in gets crushed into a single point with zero dimensions. As in, a point with no length, width, anything. This is called a singularity.\n\nOr, another theory is that there are wormholes. If you get sucked in a black hole and survive (heh...not likely), you get thrown into a different part of the universe, or another universe, or another dimension, or whatever. However, the wormhole theory is losing support as of now.