What is the sentence for rape in california?
98818
look the sentence of rape in quraan,please only once read that,WHY WESTRAN MEDIA WANT TO CREAT TERROR AGAINST ISLAM \n\nthis is very very important question , \nthere is a set petron in this world , 1. if u r right then u prove with wisdom 2. if u r not right and u r 100% wrong just then u can bark like dogs,\nwestran media have no prove against islam and muslims , so they are just barking now.\nevery one know that PROPHET MOHAMMAD PEACE BE UPON HIM GAVE WISDOM TO WORLD. EVERY ONE LOVES HIM BECAUSE OF QURAN.WHICH IS BOOK OF ALLAH AND PROPHET MOHAMMAD GIVES THIS BOOK TO THE WORLD AND U KNOW THIS IS NOT ONLY BOOK OF RELIGION THIS JUST A PETRON OF LIFE , AND IN MODEREN AGES ,more then 1000 scientific theories are proved by quran , if u want to know more about quran in english u can visit \n\nhttp://www.quranicteachings.co.uk\n\nand also u can go on \nwww.toluislam.com \nthis will be a great source for u,\nthankz alot , \n\nMOHAMMAD IMRAN KHAN
149859
http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/Offenders/handbook.html gives you all the info needed for parole in cali. good luck
588064
Rape:\n\n§ 3123. Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse.\n(a) Offense defined.--A person commits a felony of the first degree when he or she engages in deviate sexual intercourse with a complainant:\n\nby forcible compulsion; \nby threat of forcible compulsion that would prevent resistance by a person of reasonable resolution; \nwho is unconscious or where the person knows that the complainant is unaware that the sexual intercourse is occurring; \nwhere the person has substantially impaired the complainant's power to appraise or control his or her conduct by administering or employing, without the knowledge of the complainant, drugs, intoxicants or other means for the purpose of preventing resistance; \nwho suffers from a mental disability which renders him or her incapable of consent; \nwho is less than 13 years of age; or \nwho is less than 16 years of age and the person is four or more years older than the complainant and the complainant and person are not married to each other.
183610
I'm not really sure about Michigan law, but I am a former Criminal Investigator from a district attorney's office in New York and I can explain the prosecution and conviction process here and maybe it will relate.  There are different levels of rape (degrees) and the prsecution and conviction depend on this.  If you forcibly rape someone it carries a higher penalty then the the 18 yr. old boy who has sex with his 16 yr. old girlfriend.  Because 16 is not deemed old enough to consent even if she says "yes" it's still rape, but that's not as serious as forcable rape.  If the defendant has prior criminal history, especially in the same type of activities, it will bring a bigger punishment.  The prosecutor has to provide the evidence and prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did in fact commit this rape.  If there is no plea bargain and the case goes to trial and the defendant loses, he will get the maximum sentence allowed by law, basically for wasting the courts time.  A conviction means you have been found guilty of the crime either by a jury or by an admission.  It's a formal charge entered by the courts.  Being arrested and charged does not mean the same as a conviction.  You have to be found guilty in a court of law to have a conviction.  I hope this helps.  I'm sorry I can't give you minimum and maximum sentences in Michigan, I just don't know the answer to that.  Every state is different.
234947
It depends on the state.  If you believe someone is a sex offender, I know in CA we can look it up by going to Megan's Law and type in the area we are looking for.
194710
Not as many years as you should be sentenced to for being guilty of slaughtering and assaulting the English language. Oh my gosh! "Found guilty," "manslaughter," "assault."\n\nBut I'm not winning any friends that way. Here's an answer to your question:\n\nIt depends upon the jurisdiction, whether the judge has to use mandatory minimum sentencing, whether the guilty person had a prior record, whether s/he is a juvenile. It depends upon whether the person was found guilty in a trial and the sentence was recommended by a jury, or decided strictly by the judge; or, whether the defendant took a plea bargain from the district attorney and allocuted to the crime in front of a judge; and, whether the judge followed the sentencing recommendations laid out in the plea bargain. \n\nIn some jurisdictions the charges that you have mentioned are simple and straightforward; in others, there may be degrees of seriousness of each. In New York, there is manslaughter in the "first degree" and in the "second degree." They mean different things and have different punishments associated with them.\n\nIf this person is awaiting or in the middle of the trial, the jury will possibly have some say over whether lesser-included charges can dictate the sentence. There are two ways: one is by "jury nullification," where they come up with their own charge (very rare); another is that in some jurisdictions the jury can be instructed to find a person guilty of the most serious crime that the person has committed if they believe that the prosecutor has proven guilt, but not all of the facts of the highest charge. For instance: if someone were charged with manslaughter, and was obviously guilty of involvement in the murder but had not intended to kill the victim, the jury might be able to come back with a verdict of negligent homicide.\n\nOther factors: how much time did the person spend in jail before and after the indictment? Will that be deducted from the final sentence as time-served? Is the DA trying the person for both manslaughter and aggravated assault, or is the second somehow a lesser-included charge? Will the judge run the sentences consecutively or concurrently? (The defendant might get 7 years for manslaughter and 2 for aggravated assault. If concurrent, the max is 7 years; if consecutive, the person is being sentenced to 9 years.)\n\nYour question, though, is about how many years the person would serve. Besides the variables in sentencing, there would be considerations for good behavior and decisions by the parole board. So there's no way, with the information that you've given, that anyone could tell you exactly how long the defendant you describe would have to stay in jail.
190926
I know the maximum sentence is 1 year in jail... not sure about the maximum fine.
112406
5 YEARS PRISON TIME IF PROSUCUTED.
1144800
We are getting raped her it is $3.29 in Hemet, CA
997836
I am assuming it's California and it's over 65 mph.  The answer is it depends on the county.  Here is the basis for fines set forth by Judges in CA\nAmount ($ Range): 1st offense-Not more than $100 2nd offense (within 1 year)-Not more than $200 3rd or subsequent offense (within 1 year)-Not more than $250 Veh. Code §42001(a)(1), (2) & (3)
123646
Unfortunately for you and your boyfriend, California is one of the few states with 18 years old as age of consent.  Since your boyfriend is less than 3 years older than you, the following can apply:\n\nCALIFORNIA CODES, PENAL CODE\n261.5 (b) Any person who engages in an act of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor who is not more than three years older or three years younger than the perpetrator, is guilty of a misdemeanor.\n\n(e)(1)(A) An adult who engages in an act of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor less than two years younger than the adult is liable for a civil penalty not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000).\n\nAnd it's the prosecutor who charges your boyfriend with the crime, not your parents. You have no say in whether he's charged or not.
1007167
Wait a minute.  You saw this happen on the news, and now you're wondering if...what you saw really happened?\n\nAnyway, slagathor's got it pretty well down (couple of posts above mine), but it really depends on what state you're in, and exactly what a person says.  In California, just saying you're going to hurt someone probably does not qualify as a threat because this state requires you to threaten someone with death or great bodily injury...and punching me in the shoulder probably would hurt, but would not be considered great bodily injury.\n\nHere's the law slagathor was talking about, just so you can see how California addresses these kinds of things:\n\n422.  Any person who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in which it is  ade, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and thereby  causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed one year, or by imprisonment in the state prison.
584246
California Jails By County\nFeaturing: Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange, San Diego, Kern and Ventura Counties.
674912
B felony where I live, with 10-20 year sentences.
271408
California Sex Crimes - Raping, Rape: Spousal, Date, Statutory |...\nSealing Records Expungements. Spousal Rape Statutory Rape ... Most sexual assault crimes are felonies. Lesser offenses are charged as a...\nhttp://www.lacriminaldefenseattorney.com/Rape.html
174288
Yes i live in England and a few monthe ago their was  the trial of a man and woman accused and found guilty of the rape and commiting numerous sexual acts on a 12 week old baby there was even photographic evidence that these people had themselves took the sentences passed down were outragous he got 8 years and will be out in 4 and she got 4 and will be out in 2
104400
Yes, there is a law against this. In California, the crime is called "unlawful sexual intercourse".  Note that it does NOT matter if both are minors, and this crime IS being actively prosecuted in California due to the high rate of births to teenage mothers.\n\nPer California State Penal Code Section 261-269:\n\n261.5 ...\n\n (c) Any person who engages in an act of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor who is more than three years younger than the perpetrator is guilty of either a misdemeanor or a felony, and shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by imprisonment in the state prison.