what kind of leader do you choose?
117947
If the person who has a wide vision,a prgmatic process,a great dedication and keeping a good human relationship, I will choose him as my leader.
149362
Choose the Democrats if you have any cents.
55812
There are 3 types of leadership styles:\n\n(1) Authoritarian (autocratic)\n\nThis style is used when the leader tells her employees what she wants done and how she wants it done, without getting the advice of her followers. Some of the appropriate conditions to use it is when you have all the information to solve the problem, you are short on time, and your employees are well motivated. \n\nSome people tend to think of this style as a vehicle for yelling, using demeaning language, and leading by threats and abusing their power. This is not the authoritarian style...rather it is an abusive, unprofessional style called bossing people around. It has no place in a leaders repertoire. \n\nThe authoritarian style should normally only be used on rare occasions. If you have the time and want to gain more commitment and motivation from your employees, then you should use the participative style. \n\n(2) Participative (democratic)\n\nThis type of style involves the leader including one or more employees in on the decision making process (determining what to do and how to do it). However, the leader maintains the final decision making authority. Using this style is not a sign of weakness, rather it is a sign of strength that your employees will respect. \n\nThis is normally used when you have part of the information, and your employees have other parts. Note that a leader is not expected to know everything -- this is why you employ knowledgeable and skillful employees. Using this style is of mutual benefit -- it allows them to become part of the team and allows you to make better decisions. \n\n(3) Delegative (free reign)\n\nIn this style, the leader allows the employees to make the decision. However, the leader is still responsible for the decisions that are made. This is used when employees are able to analyze the situation and determine what needs to be done and how to do it. You cannot do everything! You must set priorities and delegate certain tasks.\n \nThis is not a style to use so that you can blame others when things go wrong, rather this is a style to be used when you have the full trust and confidence in the people below you. Do not be afraid to use it, however, use it wisely! \n\n\nThere is no "best" style. You have to learn baout your employees, what they are capable of, how much they can be trusted, etc., and then you must pick a style to fit your particular work environment.
838407
A manager does the right thing. A good leader does things right. \n\nThe most important personal qualities of a leader is wisdom. Always able to apply the best possible solutions to resolve problems or maximize efficiency  (and this doesn't means always do things by the book but at the same time, he/she must able to do this appropriately)\n\nWith wisdom, a leader will be able to think wisely and bring the best out of everyone including themselves and create a close bond and enhance the morale for their team.\n\nTo be a good leader doesn't always need to be a expert in the feild of their work in fact some of the top leaders in history wasn't a expert in any field apart from leadership. They were very capable in dealing with human relation that they can hire expert in many field to specialize the field of work. \n\nOf course, being a knowledgeable leader is not a bad thing too but being a true leader is far more important.
908891
Too great a volume of decisions to be made.\n\nThe fact is that most people don't even put in the effort to choose their leaders wisely, so how could they be counted upon to make wise policy decisions, which would require even more effort?
605889
Choose the right teams
613619
well,  it depends if they were close to me or not.  being a leader is something that i do in a job.  i try to be fair with friends and family. and I'm always open for suggestions, from co-workers and friends.  so if asked, i would just be more polite about my bossiness
833092
This is a wonderful quote - I'm so happy you posted it. Seems contradictory, doesn't it? How could someone who wants to lead be willing to have no one to lead? The best answer I can think of is to consider what people you would be most willing to "follow." Would it be a person like Mr "A," who makes it a point of letting you know that he thinks his way is the best and insists that you support him, or Ms "B," who simply decides on what she thinks is the best course of action and pursues it, even if no one else goes along with her?
627845
SOME LEADERS CAN CHANGE THIER LEADERSHIP STYLE WHILE SOME CANT\nBUT IN COMPETITIVE WORLD ONLY FLEXIBLE LEADER CAN SUCCED
82380
the director or principal
630402
Well, you have to choose something!
48250
are you closer with one of them? do you have similar beliefs, temperaments, etc? Its hard to say which person you should choose, not knowing much about either one.
874290
Not in this time and era. I would like just one person to be for the people that was elected by the people. Great leadership is non existent in today's America. All I have left to do is pick by party, and pick the lesser of the two evils. Good question.
85774
flip them in the air, which ever one comes down heads up, choose him. just kidding ,I think you already know the answer to this question, go by your gut feeling.
1005071
Usually, it's the parliamentarian. If you don't have a parliamentarian (get one next year), then someone like the sargeant at arms or someone who has a formal position of enforcing the rules. You could just randomly select individuals from the organization body to make up the "constitution committee" which would be more constitutional and democratic.
1172815
First, I look for someone who has similar views.  My vote is first and foremost electing someone to represent me.  Then, honesty, integrity, loayalty, wisdom and the ability to stand up for what they believe in.
745504
How would I know what your choice is?