eg. the name list of people who travelled on fight B on a certain date.\nOr what where all the flights that in terminal F on a certain date.
138248
Flight papers are required to be kept on file for 90 days. Although I am not positive, I would assume the same is true for the passenger manifest in case any customer service inquiries are made after the flight.\n\nGate assignments (or terminals) are not kept on file by the airline, but the same flight number usually goes to the same gate every day.
252457
Try http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KGB
675547
Interesting! My first thought was the F-22. do you still have access to the photo? I would like to see it. My 360 page has my email and Messenger id on it.
566782
http://www.sheets.dk/sheets/
340618
http://www.saudiairlines.com/aboutus/employment.jsp
100009
do a Google search...that ought to do it...
245052
Christchurch International Airport. The figures are for monthly inward travel. You can divide each month by the number of days to get daily average figures.
28946
http://directory.ucsf.edu/people_result_set.jsp
51775
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_celebrities
170020
http://www.fileedge.com/get/jets-in-flight/\n\nhttp://www.filesland.com/download/aircraft.html\n\nhttp://www.topfighters.com/screensavers.php
506754
send me plane tickets to somwhere fun
520827
try the online public library for that town, you should be able to acsess the periodicals and references.  you can try the yellow pages option on your toolbar and this has a last know date option.
101212
you can try Http://www.imdb.com   they have all movies listed with their stars
322684
you might want to go to a flight site for that answer
70225
http://www.sedona.net/fdetat2/history.html\n\nthis should help
253653
WASHINGTON, May 20 — Allowing frequent fliers to bypass much of the airport security hassle in exchange for giving up some personal information in advance has yet to happen, four years after the idea was first proposed.\n\nThe concept, first called "trusted traveler," emerged weeks after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and was popular with some airlines, frequent fliers and lawmakers. But now, the Transportation Security Administration is suggesting that the benefits will range from slim to none, except perhaps for the likelihood that the line waiting to reach the checkpoint will be shorter.\n\nKip Hawley, director of the Transportation Security Administration, told reporters this week that the concept, now called "registered traveler," was not a priority because it would not cut risk of a terrorist attack. And if private entrepreneurs assembled a package of tools that helped identify threats to security — including background checks and perhaps equipment at the checkpoint that would sniff, scan or otherwise sense explosives — the payoff might be that such qualified travelers would not have to remove their shoes or suit coats, or take laptops out of their briefcases for inspection.\n\n"If we get enough things in there that raise the bar, then we can say, Yes, you can keep your coat on or your shoes, or whatever," Mr. Hawley said.\n\nIn fact, a T.S.A. laboratory in Atlantic City is testing a device developed by General Electric, with technology similar to a hospital magnetic resonance imaging machine, that looks for shoe bombs.\n\nGeneral Electric, in addition to being a supplier of airport security equipment, also owns a minority share in the only company now operating a "registered traveler" checkpoint in Orlando, Fla., Verified Identity Pass Inc. G.E. is working on a second device that might let screeners determine with confidence whether a briefcase stuffed with a laptop computer had a bomb in it.\n\nBut Mr. Hawley said that if the private companies that want to offer such "registered traveler" services could successfully develop detection technology, his agency would consider buying and deploying it for general use.\n\nAfter Sept. 11, many aviation experts said checking a traveler's criminal background could determine how much screening was necessary. But Mr. Hawley and others said that terrorist attacks on London buses and subways last summer showed that attackers need not be foreigners or have criminal backgrounds.\n\nProponents of a registered traveler program are disappointed with the lack of progress.\n\n"You cannot imagine the frustration up here," said Representative John L. Mica, Republican of Florida and chairman of the House Aviation Subcommittee. "We're screening the same people over and over again," he said, arguing that people who have security clearances, are in the armed forces or law enforcement, work as commercial airline pilots, and a variety of others need not be screened.\n\n"It's turned into a farce," Mr. Mica said. "They've gone around the corner so many times, they're running around in circles and they've accomplished nothing."\n\nBut the pilot program in Orlando has proved popular. Verified Identity, which charges $80 a year, said it had signed up 23,000 people. Its members go to a dedicated lane where the wait is generally two to four minutes, said Steven Brill, founder of the company. Airports in San Jose, Calif.; Indianapolis; and Cincinnati will follow soon, he said, and he added that his company would soon announce a partnership with a major airline. In February, Hyatt Hotels and Resorts said it would give away memberships to its best customers.\n\nMr. Brill said that even if the government decided to buy for all security checkpoints the technology developed for the registered traveler program, his customers would still have the better equipment two years earlier, in a process
555350
FAA ALJ decisions are available in the reporter, "Clark Boardman Callaghan’s Federal Aviation Decisions" and decisions are also available through LEXIS and WestLaw. You may also want to search the FAA's website library, http://www.faa.gov/library/\n\nI would suggest using LEXIS, http://www.lexis.com/  unless you have access to a good law library. As a student, if you don't already have a password, you can request access to LEXIS or Westlaw through your school's library. \n\nGood luck!