IS THE LAW OF ACTION AND REACTION APPLIED IN THIS CASE?
125953
Is Israel in any way responsible for 9/11? I believe so, but indirectly. It is Israels opression of the Palestinians that fuels radical Muslims hatred of them. It is America's unconditional support of Israel that makes radical Muslims hate us. The attacks of 9/11 are a direct result of our support of Israels oppression of the Palestinians.\n\nDoes Israel feel guilty? Of course not. They don't feel guilty about forcing Palestinians from their homes, stealing their land, killing them, building a wall seperating families. Why would they feel guilty about this?\n\nrallman@sbcglobal.net: Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. Turn off FOX news and open your ears. Even your beloved president has said it.
71587
Umm....  there is no way to disprove it....thats why its called a law, not a theorem.  Also, you need to be more specific.  What ways?  Whats experiments?  \n\nAsk again with  more details and I will help you
146634
This may actually have to do with Newtons laws of physics. This one would seem to be "Every action has an equal and opposite reaction"
600964
I am definately not qualified to give legal advice but my guess is the judge will come up with the same conclusion you just stated in your question.... YOU forgot to put the safetly on, therefore, your negligence is what caused the bb to go off... so, it's your fault and you are to be held liable for it. Don't you agree?
204577
I would go to the clerk of the court that this action would be in.  They usually have form books that you can copy.
407162
Yes, but it might be difficult to prove. It is called...i think slander or public defaming or something like that. Despite this, proof of the action(s) might be very difficult to prove, and the cost of the suit might not be reasonable.
619850
That is a complex situation with lots to be sorted out.  The best approach would be to take one step at a time.  Work on each step of the process.  Overall, the bank can take action and then it is up to you to show why the action was not proper and defend your actions.  It is a difficult mess, but hang in there, make sure you can show and prove your facts and it can be resolved in time.  At best, mediation may be the answer for your situation.
488196
Well you asked 2 question...\nDo you have the right?\nNo! absolute not! I don´t know much about American Law (you must be from there) but most international Law has a thing called proportion...for example, if somebody with no gun try to rob you, you can´t kill him with a bazooka ´cause you answered such higher than the danger that he could provoke on you...\n\nWhat would you do?\nIf I could I  would  kick his a-s-s deeply, or if he´s stronger I would call my friends to help me on that but it would be pointless...\nExpect for reaction, it always come...You should know who you´re fighting with...if he´s not involving in any gang...\nIf he´s not the wise thing to do is react immediately, he spits on you and you bang on his nose immediately...and go away...
403607
will know tomorrow morning.  My guess is that there will NO effect. He has no control and what effect would have been only minimal.  Besides it is already in mkt place.
15089
As you know, Newton's Third Law of Motion states that for every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction. This is applicable only to an action originating from a mass. When you consider a rocket, gas is ejected out from the thrust nozzle with great acceleration. This is achieved when a force is applied on the gas.\nNow, when a force is applied on the gas by the rocket to thrust it out, the gas exerts an equal and opposite force on the rocket, thereby resulting in acceleration of the rocket in the direction of the net resultant force. Thus there is no need for any atmosphere or body which exerts a reaction force other than the gas ejected!! So there you are !!!
425623
You might just use the formula: \nEntropy of the reaction  = \n(sum of the entropy of products) - (sum of the entropy of reactants)\nIt's as simple as that :)\nThanks.
40919
First, this is being reported as an accident.\nSecond, if the other person does not press charges, then there is nothing that anyone can do.
385265
omg i just had this test today too!!!!!\nu use hess's law to find the change--->write the equation, balance it \nand then use the moles (coefficients) to multiply the change is s for each element.\nhess's law says that the change in s (or h, or G, its usable for any of the thermo concepts) is equal to the sum of the entropy of the products minus the sum of the entropy of the reactants. its pretty easy after that--just plug in the values and there you go! \ngood luck! this was a hard test for me..so confusing.
390316
Law of unintended consequences?
510091
Innocent until proven guilty.  Even with a preponderance of evidence, you are still innocent until the prosecuting attorney convinces the 12 person jury that you are guilty.  What if the evidence was analyzed by a computer that took into account all the facts and nothing else.  Do you think justice would be dolled out with supreme accuracy then?  I don't know.  But, no one in this life can escape the universal law of cause and effect.  What goes around, comes around to bite you in the @ss sooner or later.  It is inevitable.
54593
No.  Just as you cannot prosecute someone for doing something that was legal at the time the act was committed but no longer legal, you cannot exonerate someone for breaking what was a law at the time the criminal act was committed.  Look at it this way, it's not what they did that was wrong, it was that they disobeyed what was written as law.
521394
If case 1 involved part of the question, and case 7 covered another part, and case 4 touched on another but the same part as 2, but different from 7, the court Interprets the law as it applies to that case. \nThis is why you have Dissensions, Recuseing and Affirmations. If the Affirmations outnumber the others, that is how the law is interperted.