Please state facts as this is not a yes/no question.
134027
Yes he did. In oder to see the fact we must look at some pattern.\n“By Way of Deception – thou shalt do war”, as ex-Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky reveals is the official motto of Israel’s Mossad\n\nDoes Zarqawi Really Exist?\n\nDoes Abu Musab al-Zarqawi really exist? If he does, could he be serving Israel, the U.S.A., and other Zionists Imperialist interests? One should question how come the U.S managed to capture Saddam Hussein, a president of a country, who used to have palaces with gold toilet bowls, but have failed to capture ‘Zarqawi’, a guy who would be running away in sandals in the sand. The answer is simple: if ‘Zarqawi’ does exist he would have been created by Mossad and the CIA to serve their purposes and is still free to carry out his terrorist activities. \n\nThe ‘Zarqawi’ myth has been invented to cause sectarian violence in order to achieve the goals of the Zionist Imperialists, which is ultimately to divide and conquer. The Zionists Imperialists first reason to attack Iraq was because of WMD, which by now we can all agree was nothing but a huge lie. After failing an attempt to try smuggling some biological chemicals from Kuwait to Iraq to cover up their lies, they came up with another tool called ‘bringing Democracy’. This tool was going to be used to raise another puppet. After failing to do so, as they were disappointed after the result of the election in Iraq, they got desperate and, as usual, they chose their number-one skill, which is terrorism and violence. They dispatched ‘Zarqawi’ to intensify terrorist attacks in order to delay forming a unity government. That is exactly when ‘Zarqawi’ intensified his attacks. This time they really got desperate by targeting women and children of a specific sect (the Shia) and their holy shrines, hoping to cause a civil war using similar tactics previously used all over the world and throughout history. Another simple way of understanding these Satanic methods is to see who is benefiting from these actions. \n\nTerrorist Attacks in Iran\n\nIraq is not the only country who is their victim. Bombings in Iranian cities, including the recent bombing in the south-western city of Ahwaz on January 2006,  were also another example of false flag operations aimed at causing conflict between sects in that country. Later, an investigation by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) found that British agents were the root causes of such barbaric methods. Thanks to them for unearthing the truth. Most of the time such investigations are blocked since the investigators are part of these criminal activities. \n\nEgypt’s Election Manipulation\n\nIn Egypt yet another false flag operation happened in Cairo April of 2005, right before the election. Right after it Hosni Mubarrak’s regime started to crack down on Islamic parties who were his opponents. He did in fact benefit from these circumstances. Could he have been orchestrating these actions with the help of Mossad and the CIA? \n\nLying in London and New York\n\nDid the July 7 London bombing crack down on Muslim communities who were rising side by side with other citizens looking for the truth and questioning their government for the illegal war in Iraq that was being justified by lies? The bombing diverted attention from internal scandals of the Tony Blair government, including Britain’s plans to go to war with Iraq well before September 11 of  2001.\n\nKnowing all this, can we conclude that the September 11 attacks on New York benefited the Zionist Imperialists? Right after the attack, the Zionist regime of Israel started massacring innocent Palestinians in Jenin refugee camp?  The U.S.A., on the other hand, was going to war on the pretext of a “War on Terror” in order to control the world’s most important energy fields in the Middle East, fearing the rise of China’s demand for oil. It is well known that the U.S.A. had pre-knowledge of the attacks yet did not stop them. \n\nDanish Cart
614672
No, I do not believe you.\nWhy didn't you give us your source?
341271
I think this is more of a statement than a question. \n\ncc
632277
No, that's not a statement, it's a question. Two, actually.
165603
PLEASE TELL ME IT ISN'T SO.
179739
This is not a question.
656337
You don't provide enough information to answer your question.
624744
Possibly.  Need more details.
406291
Your answer may lie in the link below.
668085
THIS IS NOT AN ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION! ok
1719
Ask in the newsgroup linked below.
59258
Yes. Its not a dumb question.
481452
And this is based upon what evidence?\n\nHow about a source.\nHm still no source for your misinformation.
568138
This isn't a question.
484522
Sorry.  Your question is not clear.
243332
Its false. If it is true. It would not have been mysterious.
475519
not right now, no.\nthank you for asking.\n-nny