one of the writer in pagsibol  a student book
123768
A sicily born mathematician/physicist.\n\nArchimedes (Greek: Αρχιμήδης ) (c. 287 BC–212 BC) was an ancient Sicilian mathematician, physicist, engineer, astronomer and philosopher born in the seaport colony of Syracuse. He is considered by some historians of mathematics to be one of the greatest mathematicians in antiquity; Carl Friedrich Gauss considered him one of the two greatest ever.\n\nWell known for proposing Archimedes principle related to relative density of object and floatation. When he found the truth about relative density.. it is said that, he ran out of the bath yelling at the top of his voice -- "Eureka, eurteka" -- meaning I found it i found it.
311079
You should not make up a book!\nYour teacher would find out anyways...\ngo to www.sparknotes.com and pick a book
92989
I do. He is a delightful writer. He wrote humorous books with satiric political and social undertones. And he's proudly Pinoy!
513357
here in IIT kharagpur ... theory of computaion by  "michel sipser" is folllowing ..and i think it is the best book ..written by  a MIT prof ...
403986
I think what you've done so far is very good, but it is really only scratching the surface.  Assuming that you have to compare the 2 texts you cannot assume that other readers will sympathise with either of the adult males, so you have to point out how the sympathy came about.  To do this refer directly to how the author's use of specific words within the text engender feelings; for example the teacher is 'pleased' and 'delighted' with the lesson however because of the 'theft' of rubbers and his inability to detect who was doing the stealing, he felt like 'a bad teacher' and thus went back on his word.  This extract shows the power struggle that goes on in a classroom and is possibly an indication that the teacher is new and unable to command respect or obedience.\n\nThe second extract shows a similar theme where a father appears to be losing the respect and (he thinks) the love of his daughters.  As they are growing up he realises that his position as ''Number one man'' will be taken by the young men who will come 'prowling'.  The author's use of this word gives the reader the impression that father thinks of his daughters as vulnerable, that they are merely unwary prey for the predatory young men.\n\nFind other examples like these, starting at the beginning of the text and work your way down.  Good luck and hope that helps.
29326
No it is not true. There are some phony websites out there saying the personality can be read by handwriting but its all just a bunch of nonsense. I think you teacher is trying to pretend to be some kind of physcic. I do that sometimes too.
214535
i wouldn't know if anyone wants to buy such books.why not take it to the department of linguistics in any university offering it maybe that could be of help.
47353
try this site: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/ you might get some idea. goodluck
422881
Go to Yahoo or Google and do a search for the title.  You'll get a lot of hits.  This one is really good, from an online review at amazon.com:\n\n "Black Dogof Fate" Is a Fuzzy Grey Beast at Best , May 24, 2005\nReviewer:Bedros Afeyan "Bedros Afeyan" (Pleasanton, CA) - See all my reviews\n(REAL NAME)   \nPeter Balakian's book, "Black Dog of Fate," tries to be too many things\nand sadly fails at many of them. In essence, it is an attempt to tell a\nsort of Armenian-American story which I find not overly interesting or\ncompelling. I wish the author had done a bit more in-depth work to learn\nabout his people and their rich heritage before embarking to represent it\nor explain it or share it with non-Armenians, for he has much more to absorb\nand understand himself first. I find the Armenianness in this book to be\ntentative, unengaged and unconvincing. Pity, since the author seems to\nhave a lot of passion in his pursuit of other aspects of his life such as\nfootball, the Yankees, modern poetry, and exposing Turkish attempts to\nbuy (among others) Princeton professors to act as mouthpieces giving\nlegitimacy to their vile historical revisionism, practiced by the\n"modern" Turkish state and its organs.\n\nIt seems to be all the rage these days to elevate personal histories and\nfamily testimonials into the realm of fiction and novels. The "I" and "we"\nand "us" occupy center stage and the reader is invited to enjoy the\nintimacy that must surely be in place via this artifice. But is it realy?\nSince in order to make this legitimate, the writer must distance himself,\nat least initially, from all this old world exotica, and like the reader,\nquestion their validity or relevance in present day North American\nsociety. What are all these old world, old fashioned ghosts and traditions?,\nis the first cry of writer and reader alike, only, ofcourse, to be followed\nby a sharp bank turn where the writer steers the satisfied and in-place\nreader towards the opposite viewpoint wherein *this* culture and *this*\nlifestyle become suspect in light of some tentative spotting of cultural\nwealth that has been traded in or abandoned in order to swim swiftly towards\nmaterialistic, memory-free, self-redefining, "comfort" seeking and buying\nmores.\n\nIn the Balakian tale, one encounters suburbia instead of substance,\nworldly goods acquisition instead of deep roots that steady the soul,\nimmediate family and relatives running away from their true identities either\ntowards surrealism, the abstract and unemotional, or else towards medicine,\nrespectability and detachment. Young Balakian observes but never\nunderstands "the grandmother" for she is shielded culturally from being\nable to reach him by her very offsprings who can not and will not instill\nthe Armenian identity he will eventually seek but never quite find. Their\ncrime is self-denial and a march to the tune of America's mixmaster\npiper. "Be unlike your past and your future will be brighter," seems to be\nwhat America promises, at the very least. The intermediate generation listens\nand adopts this credo and Peter is left to find out but never quite\nunderstand just what cost his ancestors have paid to remain Armenian and\nto preserve our culture before the final denials on New Jersey pateos while\nenjoying, as if to serve sweet irony, full course Armenian meals and the\nmixing aromas of delicacies from the old country every Sunday.\n\nPeter is lost alright, but as the book sadly shows, he remains lost.\nParaphrasing or quoting Ambassador Morgenthau does not an Armenian genocide\nexpert make. Personal family testimonials of the Turkish atrocities does\nnot a genocide history make (For that, read Vahakn Dadrian's "The History\nof the Armenian Genocide" Berghahn Books, 1995). Episodic accounts can be\ndismissed by the Turks as hear-say and as mere isolated incid
411143
Apparently someone does need to write a book, because this is the first I've heard of it.  Not that there isn't a rich store of material to work with...
546307
Is it being sent to a publisher?  If not, I think it's a waste of time.  I'm all in favor of writing a personal narrative, but this is a bit ridiculous.  I am an English teacher and I know I would never make such an assignment.
62685
i think its is a word the author made up
316284
Try sparknotes:\n\nhttp://www.sparknotes.com/lit/sevengables/
268859
I really liked getting a set of tools.  You might check out what the hot book in his field of study is.  That could be useful for his next steps.
560999
I met the writer of this book just weeks before his death. The book is 100% true.griping !!!!! I had to order it at Barnes + Noble\nTook one week. please get this book,You will not be able to put it down.Title\nNONE CAME HOME
574687
subukan mong maghanap sa mga bookstores around. siguro naman kaya mong i-summarized ang isang story kng naghahanap ka ng summarization ng biag ni lam-ang.
415560
Well, I'm reading that book now too, but my class is only on chapter 14.  Sorry and good luck!