what is better circemsized or not?
131558
circumcised is more hyginence,henceforth better.since you had been circumcised ,with or without your consent .Now you had no choice.just live with it
350353
Better to consult a C.A.,
266226
One vote for staying bald. Natural is better.
252431
Ha, ha. \n\nCome on. Surely you can find something better than that. Almost anything would be better.
458891
Check this Link:\n\nhttp://www.bredemeyer.com/pdf_files/NonFunctReq.PDF
479891
That is a little like asking which is worse cyanide or strychnine. But if you are talking about only two packs the clove would be more likely to do you immediate harm. However, best idea is to pitch all of them.
85046
There are three ways to refute your argument:\n\n1] The word "if" makes it conditional, therefore, the reader is NOT REQUIRED to follow what the succeeding statement proposes.\n\n2] The word "better" describes the condition IF the reader DOES follow the proposal [of NOT MARRYING]. However, IF the reader DOES NOT follow it [i.e., gets married instead] then, presumably, the result will 'merely' be GOOD rather than BETTER. And what's wrong or ridiculous with that??\n\n3] Being that this statement is found in the New Testament-- and presumably attributed to Paul --here is a "conspiracy theory" twist to your query: Could it also be conceivable that such statement was later INSERTED by the church scribes [the Septuagint or the selected 70 translators] in order to justify the practice of CELIBACY among the clergy of the church??\n\nBased on these three rebuttals, here's the the key question now: Does this particular one statement bear such weighty importance to you to finally alter your Faith altogether? Or wouldn't that be simply just as ridiculous as well?? LOL.
669492
This one is better!\n\nhttp://www.venganza.org/
448470
Use (a) it is the most proper and it a clearer and more direct statement.
546868
The motorized is better, Much smoother to ride or walk on.The manual is boring but cheaper.
392324
http://library.thinkquest.org/28807/data/circ2.htm
219563
Well, they both take a lot of time! And, I must see the algorithm of (....;)! When both take a lot of time, We should check the one which takes the less time! If both takes the same time, we should choose the one which takes less space (Memory space I mean) But generally, Prefer the 2nd one! I think we should try to use a general code or function in the second choice! If there isn't a general rule, then, I prefer using the 1st one, cause it takes less memory and the lines of codes will be less I suppose...
537425
a-faster\nb-no difference
511105
Cycling is better.  And it is much easier on your joints.  It is better to cycle 40 to 60 minutes than it is to run for 30 minutes.  To calculate your calories expended go to   caloriesperhour.com
445295
More surrealistical gores - yes\n\nMuch more better - no
534504
Good link.  Most of us cilvilized people would not approve of any of those methods.  Have you seen this link?\nhttp://www.obsessionthemovie.com/12min.htm\nBTW Urbangenie hasn't seen much news lately since some of that stuff was all over the news all over the world
297376
before is better, when trying to have a child.\n\nAfter is better, mostly for pleasure.