I do not think that time is real, but then you have to prove to me it is?
128314
Time is cyclic.\nThings are born, they age, they die, they are returned to the earth, they nourish the soil, life begins again.\nTalking backward couldn't happen since that moment in time has already passed.\nThat's the paradox proposed in time travel: If you went back in time, then the moment that led up to you traveling back in time would never happen.\nIn closing, time is real...measuring time is a man-made concept.\n(See, answers can be cyclic, too)
7864
at the point in time it is truly impossible to say if god is real, a myth or man made. I believe that he is real but his word has been passed down and wrote and rewrote so many times that nobody can truly prove what is real and what isn't
186781
No I can't prove that I exist. I believe that I am just a figment of my own imagination therefore I am not real at all. That also would mean that i am not answering this question and your'e not reading it for you can't exist either. Try and figure that one out. lol
507604
Yes, it is very possible. If I had told people about my time travel experience, they would call me a retard. In year 2003 or 2004, I don't remember which year it was, I had kind of like the time travel experience reliving the same day. The same exact things happened to me in two straight days. It was the most weired experience I have ever had in my life. Yeah, reliving the same day.
611094
the way i see it, anything you feel is just as real as anything else. i'm just not sure if everything is either real, or artificial. but, assuming that ANYTHING is "real", then even a person hallucinating something that noone else sees is having a "real" feeling. anyone who believes "i think, therefore i am" should agree with me.
363427
Time is relative.  It doesn't really exist.  Time is effected by the speed of motion, and is not an object.
461664
I quite agree that it is possible.  I'm not saying it did not happen here.  I just haven't seen the evidence yet to convince me at this point.
167811
absolutely.even though it is not proven
415817
You can't move through something that doesn't exist! Time is not a NATURAL feature of the universe but simply a concept invented by our species to separate events into past, present and future. There is no Cosmic Master Clock that keeps track of absolute, universal time. There is no physical "past" trailing along behind the "present," nor any physical "future" waiting up ahead for us to get there.
86401
I would ask what's your proof, and what makes you think Revalations is accurate to begin with
110324
Yes, time is a relative and would be preceived differently if it could be perceived from all the various perspectives.  Time and space fold in upon each other and we see a result but not the only result.
54057
well, we all assume that time flows in one direction and one thing follows another. Maybe that's just the way we see it. Try to imagine that you were a cartoon, 2D on a page, you have no concept of the 3rd dimension. If we could se everything that had happened at once, time wouldn't be linear but I digress. In effect non-linear time means that one thing would not necessarily come after the other e.g. I wrote this 'before' you asked the question.
623053
ask her when you think the time is rght.
457395
It's all theory, we don't know if (something) can exceed the speed of light. I would argue that time would be void at that moment, but again it's my theory. Interesting thought though.
571622
Philosophers have wrangled with this question for centuries and I comes down to this:  You simply cannot prove that you exist.  You can't even prove that the outside world exists.  After all, 'you' could just be a brain in a vat somewhere being stimulated by electrodes that make you 'see', 'feel', and 'touch'.  What philosophers have come up with is the concept of a "Properly Basic Belief".  It means that if there is no evidence whatsoever to the contrary, then you can probably safely assume that it's true.  However, that doesn't mean you can prove it.  And of course you have to be open to the possibility that evidence may turn up at some time.  So until there is evidence that I don't exist, I'll stick with the philosophers and say it's a "Properly Basic Belief" that I exist.  And of course, there's the old standby of "I think, therefore I am."
6493
I don't believe that makes sense.
217172
It is called the equation of time. It isn't really statistics though.