This is a open ended kind of question\n\nFirstly, give\na) definitions (simple and concise)\nb) elaborations (aroudn two sentences will do)\nc) exmaples of countries (name 3)\nd) advantages and disadvantages (name 2 each)\n\nof...\n\n1) democracy\n2) communism\n3)fascism/nazism/totalitariani... (all very similar)\n4) socialism\n5) capitalism
134042
Right, I'll do one for you, and that's your lot:\n\nDemocracy:\na) A state in which the government is elected by the majority of the population.\nb)The governemt is elected through anonymous ballot and is representative of the wishes and opinions of the majority of the country's population.\nc) There are no absolute democracies, but three that claim to be are: Germany, France and Switzerland.\nd) Advantages: representative of the majority, egalitarian.\nDisadvantages: Difficult and costly to maintain and instigate, a very small majority is sufficient to win the election therefore there are many people whose views are not being represented.
466502
e. both b and c are correct\n\nbasically, it was the Catholic vs Protestant nations, but they all went to the future Germany to fight. No one solved anytihng; all the sides remained the same therafter, and Germany was left in such a mess it had repercussions all the way into recent times.
515991
An easy? Do you mean an essay?\n\nSocial studies.... maybe you can do something about the development of other countries or how lifestyles are different between us and third world countries.\n\nGood luck!
194069
Of course pick something you know about - especially what you care about.\n\nSo ideas:\n\nComputers in today's world\n\nCareers in today's world\n\nEmerging world culture - global community.\n\nSocial Changes in the past 300 years.\n\nPollution and it's effect on people.\n\nWhere is the best place to live.\n\nSolar Energy
164458
Paragraph 1:\nCharacteristics of a thing cannot be made without relating it to another thing.  Then you can find it's constituent parts by contrasting it with this other thing.\n\nParagraph 2:\nCharacteristic = invariant.  Says same thing virtually as first paragraph.  Added information: variants = varied.  A whole is compared to its parts which create different perspectives to view the whole from.  Like eating an elephant from different sides, the one side blind to the other but of the same.\n\nParagraph 3:  All experiments reveal something different since one can best see what one sees best oneself.  \n\nThis all proves that its very very difficult to see how the varied characteristics of variants and invariants can vary.  And how the makers of aspirin were way ahead of their time.  Geez.
65519
Share w them what u have learnt. \n\nTell them communism is utopian.\n\nTell them socialism is somewhere between communism and capitalism. It promotes REAL democracy, save the environment, doesn't need people to work like a dog... etc./
248351
1.Intelligence\n2.Exaggerate\n3.Opportunity\n4.Dilemma
129074
Democracy is the best we've had so far.  I would like to see more direct democracy in the future.\n\nThe converse of democracy is a dictatorship.  There are many advantages to a dictatorship as well.  Countries with dictatorships essentially take a greater gamble.  A democracy will never vote in the best leader for a country, because the average IQ and political knowledge of a country is not great enough to make this decision.  A dictatorship with a perfect leader would enjoy a strong government for the leader's lifetime.\n\nThe problem with a dictatorship is that when a bad leader is in place, or when power gets the better of them, the country is stuck with them.\n\nKeep in mind that the most deadly dictator of our time, Hitler, was born out of a German democracy.  Now, Hitler never won more than 37% of the vote.  Somehow, the majority government fell and handed the power to him by default.  \n\nAll I can say is that we still have a lot to learn about what makes a great government system.\n\n\np.s...I agree with the comments about communism, but must mention that this is a separate issue from democracy.  A Democratic Communist state could theoretically exist, and it may just happen in the future.  Keep in mind that it may be much ado about nothing.  We call ourselves a Capitalist state, but are far from the true meaning of Capitalist.  All in all, we are a mild socialist state.   Likewise, a future Democracic Communist state would likely not be a true communist state, but simply a stronger form of socialist state.\n\nIe.,,,the possible futures of China or Russia.
429827
Format\n\nI. Introduction\n  1.Topic Line\n  2. State 2+ things that are different and similar quickly\nII.Similarities\n  1. Topic Sentence\n  2. Example\n  3. Example\n  4. Hooking Sentence\nIII. Differences\n  1. Topic Sentence\n  2. Example\n  3. Example\n  4. Hooking Sentecne\nIV. Conclusion\n  1. Topic Sentence\n  2. Restate Everything\n  3. Concluding Sentence
207019
1. People are people the world over. Most are good, some are bad.\n2. Happy you guys are under your own rule again. \n3. Again, most people are good, some are bad. \n\nI really don't believe in generalizing an entire country or race, so that's why my answers are so generic.
318846
good project...I don't know all the answers to your questions but I bet if you googled it with the phrase\n*German Nationalism post WWII* you'd get a lot of info.\n(use the asterisk's to lock in the topic)
31727
Basically what we now call nation-building.  League of Nations - global economic realities.  Love this quote:  "A progressive country would be one where the people were able to take care of themselves."
577112
I would do something like this:\n\n* Similarities and differences among living organisms\n(For example, the characteristics of life, cells, comparing single and multicellular organisms)\n*Homeostasis in living things\n(Basic biochemical processes, Feedback systems, Disease)\n*Genetics\n(Heredity, Genes)\n*Reproduction and development\n(Cell division, reproduction among organisms)\n*Evolution\n(Theories)\n*Ecology\n(Interaction between organisms and their environments, energy flow)\n\nThese are just a few ideas.
231058
The use of the terms First, the Second, and the Third World is a rough, and it's safe to say, outdated model of the geopolitical world from the time of the cold war.\nThere is no official definition of the first, second, and the third world. \n\nFour Worlds\nAfter World War II the world split into two large geopolitical blocs and spheres of influence with contrary views on government and the politically correct society: \n\n1 - The bloc of democratic-industrial countries within the American influence sphere, the "First World".\n2 - The Eastern bloc of the communist-socialist states, the "Second World". \n3 - The remaining three-quarters of the world's population, states not aligned with either bloc were regarded as the "Third World."\n4 - The term "Fourth World", coined in the early 1970s by Shuswap Chief George Manuel, refers to widely unknown nations (cultural entities) of indigenous peoples, "First Nations" living within or across national state boundaries.\n\nHere is a map showing which ountries are which:\nhttp://www.nationsonline.org/bilder/third_world_map.jpg
366400
Countries, Facts & Figures.\n\nhttp://countrystudies.us/\n\nhttps://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html\n\nhttp://education.yahoo.com/reference/factbook/;_ylt=AjgPIHeVuFG24KzyHBaLfaBeCc0F\n\nhttp://www.mistupid.com/geography/flags.htm\n\nhttp://www.sitesatlas.com/Maps/Info/countries.htm\n\nhttp://www.sitesatlas.com/\n\nhttp://www.scalloway.org.uk/\n\nhttp://www.nationalgeographic.com/index.html\n\nHistory of Nations\n\nThis site has a history of every nation in the world as well as many  non-sovereign territories.  Each country is covered by a brief essay which gives the highlights of each nation's history.\n\nhttp://www.historyofnations.net/\n\nGood luck.\n\nKevin, Liverpool, England.
136818
There are way too many comparisons to even get started.  The economic circumstances as they relate to foreign trade and relations are nearly identical.  The "military advantage" over the conquered is identical.  The transformation of republic into totalitarian rule is identical.  To think that just because we repeat history but we throw more money and we have more technology so the outcome will be different is just ignorance and arrogance mixed...which the Romans had in spades just like us.
351975
the answer to your direct question-- is a definite NO. as to the thesis that accompany your question-- it all depends. not all countries are in the same "bag" --humans differ as to their origins ( I mean social and political) and their heritage and their experiences with different types of governments or rulers. we can not and should not over-simplify "democracy" that it is applicable "as is" to all countries. that is wrong and that is why we have so many issues and problems in countries where their applications is resented. to cut short a long conversation -- democracy is the best among the the worst alternatives. but it should be applied with degrees of latitude to that particular nation/government/population -- like all social remedies in life -- it will take time before it bears fruit. hope it helps.