i want know studies carried out by different researchers for theory of attraction in humans.Also how it happens orans responsible for it etc.Most of every asspect of the attraction.
130082
there sort of are.  hormones are released during puberty, and they start your "sexual awakening".  you become more nterested in romance and sex, and begin getting ready for the reproductive process (ejaculating for guys, menstruating for girls). if you are a guy, you may have wet dreams.  That is normal.  But attraction is just based on your sexual orientation, age, and preferences.  being attracted to someone in particular is all in your mind, not your hormones.  Im not quite sure that last part was accurate, but the first i know was.
217282
Love at first sight is a great idea, but impossible, love is based on much more than physical attraction alone.\n\nAnd I know my friends, but I don't think you ever really know a person...we are constantly growing and changing, thats what keeps us interesting.
37508
Good question. I am a Medical Scientist and so read alot of research papers but have never come across any papers about this! maybe the psychologists out there can help?!
608880
Although your questions deals more with race than with sexuality, a brief observation is in order: heterosexual intercourse being exclusively the ordinary route to natural human procreation, lifelong homosexuality is understandably rare among persons.\n\nPerhaps as a consequence of this, most cultures seem to have adopted a 2-person form for romantic relationships -- and in some instances, homosexual relationships are sanctioned by the State.\n\nHaving so stated, and in answer to the particulars of your question, this is what I recall from my college studies:\n\nThe following sociological stereotypes were derived by scientists from years of observation, and apply only when the entire earth population of each group is considered: caucasoid males and negroid females tend to be assertive, caucasoid females and negroid males tend to be submissive.\n\nBecause race is a function of evolution, were it not for advances in travel, there would be virtually no interracial couples.  The ancient aphorism is "birds of a feather flock together."\n\nAssertive persons tend to affiliate themselves with others on the basis of ideological compatibility; submissive persons tend to affiliate themselves with others on aesthetic grounds.\n\nNote: ideological compatibility does not preclude selfish motives; in fact, hope to realize one or more selfish aims may be for each party in a couple a driving influence (or even the sole influence).\n\nBeauty is subjective, but within cultural groups exist parameters common to the definition of a standard.  When this observation is applied on a global basis, caucasian women are generally more attractive than negroid women.\n\nThat doesn't mean there aren't stunning "Nubian" women, anymore than it means that there aren't any buggly "white" women.  Rather, it simply acknowledges a general trend that is always going to be locally rebuttable.\n\nOrdinarily, opposites attract (think of the poles of a magnet): assertive men desire as domestic companions submissive women, and vice-versa; however, the value of the aesthetic cannot be simply dismissed.\n\nAesthetic appeal is not limited to the beauty of physical form -- shape, color, tone, vocalization, etc. -- but includes personality.\n\nWith the exacerbation of competitive demands throughout both the global economy and local economies, psychoemotional pressures will continue to increase against effective assertive personalities -- (thus making them increasingly likely to be jerks).\n\nBy contrast, submissive personalities tend either to regard fate as cyclical or inevitable, and cope with the demands of life in a much more carefree manner.  This can't be lost on the "white women" that seem to crave "black men," and vice-versa.
226909
Emotional overload.  This often happens when the attraction toward another person is very strong.  There is no cure, no easy solution.  You need to learn to cope with this.\n\nThe easiest method is to learn to control your mind so that it does not become so scrambled whenever you feel the attraction.  This cannot be taught, but it can be learned.  Start with controlling your breathing.  Big deep breaths, in through the nose, out through the mouth.\n\nWatch your thoughts when you are near him.  Pay attention to what makes you angry.  Are you pleased when you think he likes you and mad when you think he does not?  Look for a pattern.\n\nWhen you are not with him, write about how you feel.  Do not pay attention to spelling or sentence structure, just try to get the feelings down on paper as they come to you.  Writing will help clarify your feelings and make it easier to talk to him.\n\nThe key to all relationships is communication.  If you want this one to go anywhere, you must learn to communicate with him.
170550
my firm personal belief is that when we find that special someone, we find them attractive and pretty, no matter what anyone else thinks of them. therefore, I say physical may not matter all that much, it is about the chemistry of two people, there views, and whether it will last or not.
284114
Although the your question/statement is horrendously written, I do agree with you.  You make a choice to act on an initial attraction.  After you enter into a relationship, you make choices every day.  You may see someone more attractive or smarter and you choose how to proceed.  The choice is either to remain faithful to your mate, or to pursue another person.  Often when relationships get ordinary (they lose that initial excitement) people stop loving their partner because they choose not to find anything exciting or attractive about their partner anymore.  To a degree, staying in love is definitely a choice.
656554
There are a number of scientific studies that do just that. I've linked to Wikipedia which sums up some of them, but the overall conclusion is that sexual orientation is determined in utero and is due to a number of factors, not just genetics.\n\nThe identical twin studies, especially those where one twin was straight and one gay, indicated that there's more going on than genetics.\n\nSimon Levay's study of brain structure indicated that homosexuals have a larger hypothalamus than heterosexuals. There have been other studies showing that gay men think like straight women as the brain activity was observed.\n\nThere's a finger-length study, indicating that women with a certain middle finger length are more likely to be gay.\n\nThere are birth order studies, where straight male children were born first and a gay male child later, suggesting that there may be hormonal influence on sexual orientation.\n\nBut whatever you think, know that it is not chosen. No one would choose to be ostracized, ridiculed, and made to feel a lesser citizen.
272959
One of my students is doing his research project on this issue, and though I have not read the paper yet, as he is not finished, I have talked with him and consulted his early sources.  He has found some interesting preliminary results.  \n\nIt seems that Sigmeund Freud, a Viennese doctor in the late 18th century studied dreams of his psychiatric patients, and through this research, he decided dreams could be interpreted as our subconscious minds' desires.  The implications for the Victorians of that era were great because overall Freud's theory of man's essential nature was that he is a selfish being whose basic motivations for life are about fulfilling those selfish needs and desires.  \n\nYet, much research has been done since that era.  A Dr. Karl(?) Jung, another later psychiatrist, has revamped Freud's original research, and even as late as the late 1980's, new research has connected dreams to chemical reactions in the brain occurring in the neurons along which all the electical impulses of the brain run, like electric circuitry, and this research says they are just random electrical discharges that have no meaning, like shadows of memories carried by the impulses, bits and pieces of images generated by earlier thoughts.  Yet, for me, this still leaves open the question.  Even if dreams are shadows of thoughts, one must ask if shadows of bits and pieces of memory would be purposeful for we humans.  I mean, why would our minds generate the shadow?  I think that is just as powerful a question as:  Why do our brains produce the chemical reactions carrying images of memories anyway?\n\nI think it is easy to see that there is much work to do yet in discovering the real essence of dreams before one can decide if there are more than random meanings to be taken from them.  And, that is basically what I am hearing from this student about his struggle with the research process so far.\n\nHope this is helpful.\n\nCC Ryder
435375
Sure, its called actually being attracted to you.\n\nCheap and effective and works everytime.
138762
I did not take this specific course in college however I have studied it extensively since I have been practicing. I honestly believe it supplies more answers than many of the theorist were able to provide.  It of course is used in conjunction with theories in practice but there is honestly an area you miss out if you don't cover it.  Try reading Molecules of Emotion, I can't think of the author, she writes in a way that is very down to earth and yet really explores the impact of emotion on neurochemistry.  From their it is easier to expand into the concepts of behavior.
109139
Great stuff going on right now having to do with developmental genes (like Hox genes).  You may know this as "Evo Devo" or evolutionary developmental biology.\n\nCheck out the book "Endless Forms Most Beautiful," by Sean Carroll.  He also gives ideas for research and new fields, lots of peer-reviewed papers.\n\nI just read it this Fall, it was great.
292199
Ideally there is no particular age when u can get attracted to any individual.Attraction starts the moment u start identifying things and understanding them..Attraction can be mental,physical or psychological.It depends on an individual as if found someone interesting the attraction may even happen at a very tender age
447115
You'll never find such a study, as the nature of subject is "stealthy"   Large percentages of lgbt live closeted to some extent.  \n\nMost studies of gays also do not get funding from traditional sources because the subject matter makes those funding nervous.  Hence the study of biological influences on homosexuality moves at snail pace because disproving that it is a choice or something acquired from the environment upsets too many apple carts, even in more progressive countries.\n\nOooooh that was a long, no answer, huh?
498686
It's fundamentally the same thing. When people see something they consider attractive -- whether it's a potential mate or just a pleasing painting -- their pupils dilate. We're also remarkably sensitive to this happening in other people, even though it's often beyond the supposed resolving power of our eyes. When you meet someone that you like, your pupils will react and if they like you theirs will react too. That signal will be subliminally caught and you will both feel accepted and validated.
582324
Researchers have found that feelings of intense romantic love are linked to activity in two areas of the brain, which have high levels of dopamine activity. But functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans found women's brains showed emotional responses, while men's showed activity linked to sexual arousal. The researchers also found activity in other areas of the brain changed - including one that another study showed was active when people ate chocolate.
474671
its obviously wayyyyyy more complicated than that...  but here is what i found.\n\n\n  The Neurobiology of Love.\n\n        * Esch T,\n        * Stefano GB.\n\n    Charite-University Medicine Berlin, Institute for General Practice and Family Medicine, Schumannstrasse 20/21, 10117 Berlin, Germany.\n\n    Love is a complex neurobiological phenomenon, relying on trust, belief, pleasure and reward activities within the brain, i.e., limbic processes. These processes critically involve oxytocin, vasopressin, dopamine, and serotonergic signaling. Moreover, endorphin and endogenous morphinergic mechanisms, coupled to nitric oxide autoregulatory pathways, play a role. Naturally rewarding or pleasurable activities are necessary for survival and appetitive motivation, usually governing beneficial biological behaviors like eating, sex, and reproduction. Yet, a broad basis of common signaling and beneficial neurobiological features exists with connection to the love concept, thereby combining physiological aspects related to maternal, romantic or sexual love and attachment with other healthy activities or neurobiological states. Medical practice can make use of this concept, i.e., mind/body or integrative medicine. Thus, love, pleasure, and lust have a stress-reducing and health-promoting potential, since they carry the ability to heal or facilitate beneficial motivation and behavior. In addition, love and pleasure ensure the survival of individuals and their species. After all, love is a joyful and useful activity that encompasses wellness and feelings of well-being.\n\n    PMID: 15990719 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]\n\nalso see:\nhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=17118931&query_hl=13&itool=pubmed_docsum\n\nthis information was from\n http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/\n\nwhen you search, it lists all the different databases that have results.. i clicked on "pubmed" and got this summary..  full papers are viewable at "pubmed cenrtal"