Probably can't get a copy. About life in the center of the Earth, has it's own Sun and ocean, dinosaurs the whole bit. Very interesting.
133826
Did read it over 20 years ago at the urging of my sister. She actually believed it. It's a pseudo science meant to be entertaining, not convincing.
601406
Also released was Jurassic Park: Chaos Island, a Command and Conquer style strategy game for the PC.I t is noted that some of the thing portrayed in the game are not like they were in the movie:
532377
I have studied earth science. \nFirst of all, their scientific name is a (best estimate) i.e. in their opinion. so the wee table is just their own version of what refers to modern day equivalent in science. \nThe only evidence they use to suggest the bible is talking about a dinosaur (rather than elephant or hippo) is a tail like a Cedar.  this could apply to crocodile but they don't mention that - apart from to say "oh -BTW it can't be a croc eh?" without actually giving any decent reason as to why.\nI don't know why I can't read Job 41 18-21without realising it breathes fire.  Such obviousness escapes me.  As also does the beetle chat. err...because one thing (and I haven't bothered to look up if it can) breathes fire, another surely can? What - how does that work? Because a flea can jump 50 times it's own heigth, can I? Also, all earth scientist would love to have a fire breathing lizard, but no studies have proved it's existance.   \nThen later (I'm skimming this now, there's loads of made up stuff), they say "Nobody has ever proven that the Bible contains any inaccurately recorded information" - well I'd kind of like to see the other way round.  Proving a negative is, well, impossible.  If I said there is a planet made of jelly a milllion light years away, does that make me correct until proven wrong? \nthen they do that wonderful thing of "hmm yes we have evidence of dinosaurs being created one day before man etc etc...but in order to see it you have to read through pages and pages of more subjective chat", personally I gave up cos if they are that confident they would put there evidence right in their on their page, or at least give a description of how.  \nThis page is someone's belief and doen't make me think anything other than what I have studied through rational science.
611280
I've haven't covered it all yet, but in no particular order:\n\nDinosaur food-(Non-flowering plants)\n\nLight Opera-(Photosynthesis)\n\nGender Benders-(The diverse physiology of sex)\n\nEverybody does it-(pollination and seed distribution by animals)\n\nHitchhikers and drifters-(Mechanical seed and pollen distribution)\n\nA Manual for a Quickie Divorce-(Plant toxins)\n\nMind Games (Psychotropic compounds) \n\nFashion through the ages (Fibers and dyes)\n\nAppendix (Oops Plants ain't got 'em!)\n\nITS MY BOOK ISN'T IT?\n\nI've only named a few chapters so far.  Inspiration cannot be rushed. And, I removed my (Oh, So clever!) annotations. \n  \nBTW-I have serious issues with the wiki TOC- (Besides its being boring)\n\nFungi, bacteria are not plants. (SHUDDER).\nVirus are not even considered alive (GASP).\n\nAnd you think I'M UNFOCUSED!
270784
try wikipedia, search fossils
39794
It is impossible as far as we can tell. Jurassic Park was a story. If anyone has been able to obtain dinosaur DNA, and that is still very much in dispute, the amount the have found is miniscule. Trying to reconstruct a dinosaur from what we have is literally like trying to physically reconstruct New York City from half a page ripped out of a telephone directory. And that is not an exaggeration. We have next to no genetic information, we have absolutely no information about the way that information was configured. We have no information about how to incubate the creature if we did create it. \n\nThose aren’t problems that can be overcome by technology. It’s not a case of retrieving the information somewhere that it’s hidden as with the human genome project. The information simply doesn’t exist. We have absolutely no way of ever getting that information ever again. \n\nThe only vaguely plausible method would be to evolutionarily ‘regress’ living descendants of dinosaurs such as birds. That’s so far outside our ability at the moment that it’s almost pure science fiction, but it isn’t actually physically impossible the way that using fragmentary DNA is.
71022
As far as I know there is not a copy that you can find. I have looked and there is not much on it. After all, this is not something that some people want us to know about. There are some good books that talk about it, but I do not know of any that have the report in it. I don't think that many people want to know, after all, it shakes their comfort to think that they might not be as "free" as they think.
475184
http://www.biotopics.co.uk/life/7chars.html
28522
the earth was at a stable orbit.  no  tilt or axis to cause differences in the seasons the earths temperature was just about uniform at 72 deg F.  the earth was at that tome also protected by the vapor barrier basically A thin shield of ice in the uper atmosphere that served 2 purposes it blocked out the harmful ultra violet radiation from the sun  and it increased the atmosphereic pressure to 2 atmospheres.\n\nthis caused things to live a lot longer and grow a lot bigger.  plants for one thing.  there is more coal on the earth right now then there are plants to produce it.  meaning if you were to take all the plants on earth right now and turn them into coal the pile of coal that you could make would be less than that currently available in the ground not including what has already been taken out.\n\nplanys grew much taller in this environment and so did reptiles lets take the crocodile.  a croc now a days can live about 100 years.  reptiles throughout thier life never stop growing.  so now you have an animal that in 100 years can grow to be about 15 feet long but instead you give it 900 years to grow.....presto you have a dinosaur.  \nthen a few thousand years ago an ice meteor crashed through the vapor barrier hitting the earth. this caused the barier to colapse and as it fell it began to melt and other various things and the world was covered in a great flood.  the earth finally settled back out into a somewhat normal rotation (you ever seen what happens to a gyroscope when you bump it)\n\nnow the earth has a 27.3? or is it 23.7 deg tilt to its rotation that causes us to have 4 seasons and tropics temperate zones and artic zones.\n\nBTW the earth is between 6000 and 10000 years old SCIENCE CAN PROVE IT.  if you want to know how just ask me.  i'll try to explane it as best as i can or you can wisit this website.  and do some reading\n\nall the SCIENCE is right there.
431448
More about life from experiences... more about the body and how things work from books... :-)
317945
Sounds interesting. Most cyrptids are probably legends but I think a few are real creatures. Would be very intersted in exploring which were which.
491103
just an fyi, in genetics one cannot OBTAIN new information, it must be handed down. therefore you can only lose information(de-evolution?). meaning reptiles that dont have genetics for wings cannot randomly grow wings someway down the line.\n\nmy favorite argument is, they dated the earth to be what some odd billion years old? 65? what happened 20 billion years before? if they found this by carbon dating, then how did the carbon have a start? how did it start? how come it just randomly started aging 65 billion years ago if its been around forever? does this rock GAIN more "life" ?
85695
Oracle Bones!! Really a very interesting story. Check out the link below (with pictures):
79202
it hasnt been proven, but there are pictures out there, tho most of them are fake\n\ni personally believe that there probably once was one, but there really isnt much chance that it is still alive\n\nit was probably a decendent of some dinosaur thing\n\nso yea, id say it is, well, WAS real
516754
http://www.blueplanetbiomes.org/climate.htm
610523
Okay,I have three points to make.Granted,I didn't refer back to your original question,but I don't think Dinosaurs existed concurrently with modern man.The bible doesn't refer to the meteor impact because no human was alive to report it,and I doubt we would be here today if we were.I don't think you can conceive of the destructive power of that event!Try this verse,"and the earth was without form,and void".Darkness ruled everything,as the natural equivalent of nuclear winter,the suspension of cubic miles of dust and water vapor in the atmosphere,blocked all sunlight,for as much as a century.\n\n2.The only verses you might be referring to,regarding the concurrent existince of man and dinosaur,would be from Job,the references to behemoth and leviathan,are most often believed to be references to the Nile crocodile(which in this period often grew to 20 feet in length)to hippopatami,or to whales.Even in the medieval period,travelers tales of strange animals became exaggerated in retelling to create mythic beasts.If you are reading John,the Revelations,those are mystical beasts which represent things,not real.\n\n3.I sure hope you read this as a serious answer.I think you're missing out on the point of Yahoo Answers if you Click "report abuse" on anything you don't want to hear.
303451
There is a woman scientist now exploring an indentation of rock (forget where) who claims there is evidence that just about everything, including and especially human beings, are from outer space.  She has been denied funding repeatedly, she says, because of bias and religious protection.  I wish I could recall the name of the show...it was on The Discovery Channel about a month ago.  Pretty interesting premise for those of us that do not subscribe to the available written texts concerning how life came to be on this planet.  Honestly tho, I don't think we will know any time soon.  In the case that the major religions are wrong, everything we know would be upturned and there would most likely be chaos among all people.  Maybe it's better if we're left to wonder.