Can a dragon be characterized as a wave , just like an electron..? If yes , how ( and where?) ? (I AM NOT JOKIN'.....n MY MIND  IS PERFECTLY IN WORKING CONDITION..)
124479
I don't really know what u mean
576036
HahAHaha.  Listen Shawny, these people seriously do NOT know what they are talking about.  But I do, you're talking about lightening without thunder!  Not lightening with thunder but it's so far away you can't hear it.  There is such a thing as lightening with thunder because it's been happening all over here in my area of Texas.\n\nAnd I don't live out in the country, I'm in good ol' Austin.  There's something mysterious surrounding this lightening, not just because there's no thunder, but because you know the lightening is the driving force of the storm and not the other way around.  If that's true, then this lightening must be coming from SPACE.  That's right I said it.  Lightening caused not by the clouds colliding with cold air but by something going on with the Sun.  Anyways, I KNOW this was coming from space because of this one special bolt of lightening that just rocked the house and I'll never forget it.  \n\nIt came down out of the clouds like an anvil, and when it hit the air it's like the air acted like and insulatoragains the electricity and stopped the bolt from coming down anymore.  Well it was THICK at the trunk and it spread out in every direction along the bottom of the clouds, like a ring of electricity or the roots of a tree, causing lightening far out across horizon as far as I could see.  That was just too much energy for me to believe that it was caused by clouds rubbing together, am I right?  Can I get an AMEN?\n\nAnyways, so you know where this lightening is coming from, but what does this have to do with heat lightening?  Well you remember that Earth has a natural electric field right?  Everything that exists from the ground up has a natural electric charge on it.  When the lightening comes in it's basically pulling electrons off of the Earth and pulling energy in.  When these travel through the plasma the air surrounding the bolt is of a way smaller charge and is repelled; this causes the thunder.\n\nSomething is going on in these storms and in Earth's energy fields that allows this energy to be moved easily and with little resistance.  I believe we'll be seeing more of this lightening in the years ahead, you can count on it.  BWahahHAhAhaaa!!!
586578
Tesla's tower, perhaps?  This is just another way we know that the solar wind is NOT electrically neutral, since the Earth has to absorb the energy and balance itself through the aurora act.  Our instruments in space can't detect the charge difference because the solar "wind" (or electric current) is so big in its plasma state, and the difference per cubic meter is so small.\n\nThis is why scientists like Phil Plait who ride on the nuts of big names like Einstein just might be wrong, but who are we to question Einstein, right?  Well we got bigger and better telescopes and satellites for one, and we've been able to take better pictures and observations because of this.  Damn, I think they were barely discovering the Sun's magnetic field during Einstein's time.\n\nThere are so many examples out there that demonstrate the electrical nature of the universe.\n\nMars, and how it got blasted?  Yep.\nhttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AlajPWBaIISxPbzkjEFDsqzsy6IX?qid=20060619194732AAwm9Mf\n\nComet's and their interactions with the Sun? Yep.  Venus' almost perfectly circular orbit, how we detected a long, "stringy" plasma structure issuing from Venus that nearly reached our planet, and how Venus spins the other direction very slowly, and how the entire planet has a nearly brand new surface, AND how ancient names for it are morning star, BEARDED planet, HAIRY planet, and SMOKY planet?  Oh yeah, double mother-fuckin' check on that.\n\nRead up on the "Electric Universe" theory, it's the future of space science.  All these old guys at NASA will be out of jobs if word ever gets out, so they'll get really mad when their life's work is challenged and I guess I can understand that.... but get OUT!
640552
You should watch the episode of mythbusters where they try to build a death ray with mirrors and need a focal point, they make a mirrior in a contact sorta shape and the light focases on it. if you could make a solar cell like that maybe it would work. The episode was on all weekend, it might be helpful for some other things too!
229102
Not the same electron, but the same number of electrons.  An electron enters one end of a wire, say, and winds up pushing an electron out the other side.  That's a simplified explanation, but that's essentially it.\n\nAnd just to make things confusing, the direction of the current is opposite to the direction of electron flow.  Go figure.
668779
WoW Dude! Hydrogen and oxygen BOTH in water! Now that is just so new-age and just today right? \nDamn Man! If you and I could just figure how to separate the two...\nSorry got lost in the thought! Please submit your picture to Ripley"s...
219400
Wave-particle duality of light in particular is observed in a number of experiments but only one or the other form.  To show this you will to explain 2 or more phenomena, for matter the photoelectric effect is the best example for waves there are plenty to choose from.\n\nThat however is for light, if you are talking about matter for example electrons as a wave, then you will have to use debrogle equation and explain a experiment like electron diffraction, where is acts as a probablility wave and builds up a diffraction pattern rather that each electron actually being considered as a wave.\n\nHope this helps
75611
im not sure if i know what youre asking. but from what i understand from my QM class, for question 1 youre right. as in the double slit experiment. when they shot electrons at it, there was a wave pattern on the screen but when they watched the slitz there wasnt. the whole thing behind this is tht by watching it, they changed somethin in the situation and cause it to be just a particle pattern. so in theory if there was an infinitely efficient watcher, then thye could see that the elctron goes through both slits and makes a wave.\nthe 2nd question, the whole theory about quantum mechanics is that nothing is definite. its a probability distribution for everything. but just some items   have a 100% probability of being in 1 spot. as in say you have a pen in your hand   then the pen has a 100% probability of being in your hand and 0% everywhere else. but for an electron, you cant see it and since it wont stop moving  there is a different probability for it. theres a probability of say 40% of the electron being over there and 60% of it being here. or somethin. and i dont know what the earthquake thing meant. but i guess the probability distribution they calculated did a really bad job and the QM probability theory could also have done a really really bad job but nobody would know since electrons cant be measured yet (i think)
376584
Actually there are dragons all over myths and cultures all over the world.  Almost every culture has some sort of serpentine or dragon-like creature in it; Chinese, Japanese, Native American, Aztec, Mayan, etc.  In fact, the idea of a serpentine creature that has various powers such as the power to fly, breathe fire, live under the ocean, and such is so wide spread that some consider it proof that dragons once existed.  Although there has been no concrete physical evidence to prove their existence, the wide spread similarities among cultures with no communication with each other about dragons is, in my opinion, too common to be coincident.\n \nPersonally, I believe they did exist at one point.  Or maybe that's just cause dragons rock.  Idk.  However, I believe that this commonality among cultures about creatures also spread to vampires or some sort of blood-sucking creatures.
584028
Yikes, I'll try, but it's tricky even for me!  And I've read a lot about it because it fascinates me!\n\nOK, the idea is that you have a cat in a box.  The cat is not visible to you, the experimenter.  In this box is a small amount of radioactive material and a geiger counter.  If one atom decays even the tiniest amount and the geiger counter catches this, a tiny flask of poison is broken and the cat is killed.  The "weird" part (hah) comes in here.  Whether or not the atom decays is strictly a probability issue.  However, using quantum mechanics, the cat would neither be alive nor dead until someone opened up the box to give it a "label" - to observe it and quantify it as alive or dead.  It would exist in a state of "alive/dead"ness, sort of.  \n\nSchrodinger used this as a way of pointing out that sometimes quantum mechanics just doesn't work for a given situation.
299096
Are you reading the mythology about the Minotaur or whatever? MYTHOLOGY!!!!!!!! No it is not possible???? Listen to MEG ^there.
313599
I posted a very similar question here not long ago (minus the farting bit)!!\nI asked if I was the only one that thought it was all 'tosh'\nI should have actually asked about ozone layers etc!\nHowever I did get a couple of very interesting answers that agreed with me, I hope you get the same response, I am sure it is all hogwash and I was very pleased to hear from others that were on the same wave length.
460428
I said it once before and I'll say it again\n\nI think Dragon can do what ever she puts her mind to\nand she will have this friend to back her up \n\nI would love to learn Dragonese..............even saying that \nword is new for me\n\nthanks
660368
Seriously kid, you need to start reading some real material by impartial authors rather than simply accepting religious dogma.\n\n\n>>>how can my soul come from an amoebe? \n\nAs soon as you present any evidence that the soul even exists science will give that due consideration. Since we have n more evidence for the existence of the soul than for the existence of leprechauns it simply isn’t an issue.\n\nAs far as anyone can tell there is no such thing as a soul.\n\n>>>>u cant go from barely anythin to something far better \n\nWell of course you can you silly girl. Have you never grown salt crystals from warm slaty water? Are you suggesting that a crystal isn’t far better than a random scattering of suspended ions?\n\nIn the real world order comes from chaotic systems all the time.\n\n>>>>and even if the big bang theory or somethin like that was\n>>> true...\n\nWhat exactly does the BB have to do with evolution? You appear be ingnorant, as are most fundamentalists, that these are two totally unconnected fields of science.\n\n>>>> what started evreything?\n\nRandom fluctuations within the quantum foam. That is what started everything.\nBut once again I ask, what exactly does the BB have to do with evolution?\n\n>>>humans havent thought of any theory that hasnt had to have a cause... a greater being\n\nAnd what caused the “greater being” my child? \n\nA “greater being” has to have a cause as well, so what caused that cause that caused the greater being? It’s turtles all the way down. At some point you need to admit that either something came form nothing, or there was no previous point and time itself came into existence.\n\nVague handwaving at some “greater being” doesn’t resolve the basic problem, all it does is violate Ockham’s razor and makes your position logically untenable.
622114
1st -- tips of the hat to in-janier and lewis_brown for stopping by long enough to give the basic physics and most of all to Lewis for politely informing us that glass is not a liquid.  \n\nGlass is a liquid?  Pull-eeze!  How in the world do you come up with that one, people?  \n\nGlass "flows" -- ???  \n\nGlass flows in liquid state -- only.\n\nGlass is solid until melted.  Then and only then it's liquid.\n\nGlass melts at 2600-2900 °F (1425-1600 °C) depending on its composition.\n\nWhere on Earth do you think glass is liquid or flows at bench temperature?\n\nAnway, I originally stopped by just to ask the asker if he or she could see through black glass (or any other opaque glass)?
276944
komodo dragon i think? but then i'd never heard of the other one. although...the person that wrote dinosaur is right to an extent...although they're not really lizards. another although coming up...trying to think...can't...going...out...:) i'm going to answer more of your questions. :)
521027
Sorry, I think they are mythical creatures.  Nice to think about, but not real.