I have 2 versions of documents for a web page and I need to know which one is better. Can you please more specific why this is better than that? \nhttp://www.freewebtown.com/animamia/webcopy.htm\n\n***This is a web content***
132018
As an ad-pro myself, I would DEFINITELY choose Version 2 : * Repetition of each Product's name is less [could even be far less wordy, and still convey the idea !]. \n* The singular forms [Changer, Player, etc.] used in the Page Title are CORRECT - as only 1 of each type is offered in the ad !\n..But the details are still TOO LONG under the 'Explore other....Tools' subhead ! Since these are obviously older versions of the Advertised Software, one single line that 'Older Versions of all Software available - at special Discount Rates !' would be far more impactful :\n[Even if there is no discount to be offered on the older Software versions, their current prices will definitely be lower than those of the brand new ones ! The retailer can lower these a bit further [by reducing his margin, a bit] - and his cash registers will not stop ringing !\nAnd please : Instead of using loooonng (!) sentences with so many commas, list the same facts in short, simple, and stylish sentences. They are also a lot easier to follow, plus understand !
218144
Info on PDF file is very useful.\nread that one.
633952
There are a lot of differences. Basically frontpage 2000 is antiquated. You have to figure that they came out with a new version for a reason. I used frontpage 2003 for my website www.gandsmusicent.com. Its worked out great...I would also suggest considering dreamweaver which is what I am designing my latest website with. There is a learning curve but once you learn it, it is better than frontpage in general. Thats my opinion at least. Goog luck
539397
Did someone make the document for you on another computer? I'm thinking they aren't embedded in the doc.\n\nOr it could be a printer problem - with how you have graphics set up to print.\n\nNo way we can really tell unless we are there to see exactly what's going on.
580667
yah i think that both should be formatted the same not sure though orrr maybe ur processor is not fast enough to handle the big file transfer yah i think thats it cuz when i copy thingas BIG things to a dvd or somethin else my pc locks up
30724
A few years ago, I did a comparison test between Office, OpenOffice 1.1.x, and 602PC Suite 4.x.  I'm pretty demanding in terms of formatting and what not.  I take time to make a document look nice so that requires alot of tricks (setting margins, setting blank lines to certain sizes, etc) but they are not overly complicated.\n\nI really wanted to like the alternatives but I was a bit disappointed that OpenOffice and 602PC Suite could open MS Office documents but their formatting was a bit off.  Some items were too wide or sizes were just not the same so I kept using Office.  I see that OpenOffice released version 2.0 so I may take a look at it again.\n\nAs a student, using OpenOffice would work because there's less of a need to share files to others.  You tend to create documents for your own assignments.  In the workplace, however, the gold standard is still MS Office.  If your report is sent to a manager or a resume is sent to a recruiter and the formatting is all funked up, that's gonna be one ding against you.
400195
You don't need to remove it, because it was tacked on by the server, not you. It's NOT in your source code. \n\nIt says "please remove" because it's aimmed at people who may want to copy the webpage.
158199
It's pretty good you've hit the 4 main points of creating a web page so that it will last..\n1- fast loading.\n2- didn't clutter it up with unessasary items or links.\n3- colors are easy on the eyes.\n4- all the links are working.\nHope your site does well..\ncheers.
531593
You have a character that is unreadable like © ® in the document? Make sure your quotations are correct and all code is perfect...touchy touchy with proper code.\n\nEmail me your site url\n\n\nMike\n\n=================
271366
Just put any link on you page to the file (as long as its not an extention which can be opened by the browser, if you want to put these files on your site just zip/rar them)
10768
hmmm... which one to chose? \nthey all used the same website!
597411
I couldn't find a way to compare them all across one page, so here are comparisons on a 1v1 basis. You'll have to sort them out.\n\nNote: Some of these articles are old and therefore outdated but still remain useful.\n\nWindows vs Linux\nhttp://www.michaelhorowitz.com/Linux.vs.Windows.html\n\nWindows vs Mac\nhttp://compreviews.about.com/od/general/ss/MacXP.htm\n\nWindows vs Unix\nhttp://aplawrence.com/Opinion/unix-windows-linux.html\n\nMac vs Linux\nhttp://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/mac/news/macosx_0301.html\n\nMac vs Unix\n(unable to find a comparison review)
102665
It is hard to understand why the content of a website is modified and doesn't read as written.....Yahoo should answer this!
637094
From an ergonomics perspective, it is proven that dark text on a light background is easier to read than light text on a dark background. I freely admit that the white text on the rich blue background looks cooler, but when you are expecting people to read paragraph after paragraph of your stuff that is not the important thing. You need to make your readers comfortable more than you need to catch their eye.\n\nMaybe you could limit the "white/yellow on blue" to your top banner and then use black, navy or dark brown text on a very pale background for the main body of your site.\n\nI didn't really get into the content. Once I saw the page I knew that it was eyestrain city. Free advice I can do; free advice that costs me pain? No.
77624
Umm... The web isn't public domain. Just because it's openly accessible doesn't mean there's no copyright on it - you wouldn't expect to be able to republish a book you took out of the library under your own name and get away with it, would you?\n\nIt's perfectly reasonable for somebody to want their site to have a unique look. Also, if somebody's worked hard for hours and hours on their site, some loser spending 5 minutes with wget to rip their work doesn't seem fair.\n\nThere is nothing wrong with looking at a page to see how something is done, and re-implementing the effect yourself... nobody should get stressed over a few lines of CSS here and there. In fact, if somebody was polite enough to e-mail me and ask me, I'd likely be very liberal in the permissions I granted, as long as they weren't taking the mick.\n\nHowever, if somebody annoyed me sufficiently, I would have no problem in taking the action needed to get their site pulled. Before now, I've had a site kicked off not one, but two ISPs after they spammed a forum I moderate.
556059
Either method will work however if you need to have a page terminated so that a new one can begin, then its a good idea to use the page break.\n\nUse of the page beak will help in keeping other pages formatted correctly
291195
microsoft encarta or wikipedia... ;p