What will happen if Iran don't stop making nuclear stuff?\nI mean if a war was waged they could still carry on in secret right? And whenit was finished they could use it on whoever was bombing them
131846
You won't have to worry they won't send off a nuclear bomb...it would kill them too...and anyway you should be asking yourself why did we ever vote Bush to be our president anyway...he is going to be the reason we get killed...he is killing so many of our men right now...ugh...he is so stupid...
143832
Israel is a lot less likely to be firing off nuclear weapons at their enemy-of-the-week than Iran is.  But who has the right to develope them and who doesn't - I don't know.   The US and the UN want to be the Police of the World, and that seems to cause more problems than it solves.
347978
They need something over there to be bombed.  I think a few cruise missiles are in order simply to wake up ahmadinejad and scare the sheet out of him.  There must be some actions and repercussions for what they are doing.  If there aren't, why would they ever stop?  It needs to be done now BEFORE they have a nuclear arsenal.  Same goes for north korea.
337904
As a start, Turbowedgie can go to hell. Sure, Iran did threaten, but they haven't done it. If it was based on threats, then we should have been invaded a long time ago. We have enough weapons to, at random, blow any country into oblivion and any of its innocent civilians, just like Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We aren't threatened by the above countries, rubbing elbows with them and all. That's why we haven't invaded SaudiArabia or Afghanistan either. Iraq and Iran have nothing we want and aren't part of the Clique, so why should we give them any freedom.\n\n\nP.S. Iraq has no weapons. Don't get it twisted, get it right. We have been in there for oil, not for nukes or the WHOLE DAMN REASON FOR THE WAR, TERRORISTS! We stopped looking for Osama a long damn time ago. So for a distraction, we entered a bullshit war over oil and, uh yeah, a dictator that isn't unlike any other dictator in this damn world. We are truly in the end days...\n\nTo go further, it would be a hell of a lot better of a world if NO country had acces to nuclear weapons and tried NOT killing civilians for a change. Nuclear power should only be used for powering cities, providing help to the city, not vaporizing children!
136393
Iran hasn't even claimed they have an Atomic weapon yet.  They only announced today that they can enrich uranium.  they still have work to do to get the bomb.
307932
The U.S. has not used a nuclear weapon at all, be it civililian or militarily, since Japan and the end of WWII, a MUCH different time than today.  I have heard claims, however, of people that believe the U.S. has freely, and openly been using "tactical nukes" in the Middle East.  This is not true.  What a lot of people are mentioning is known as depleted uranium.  While it's not exactly the greatest stuff on Earth, it is far from what some believe it is to be--a type of nuclear weapon.  It's actually used in many civilian applications as well.\n\nhttp://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs257/en/\n\nAs far as the U.S. having weapons, it's known that we have decreased our arsenal, but at the same time, still have a large amount.  Is it possible that someone could get a hold of them?  Sure, I would suppose, but why bother the U.S. and the military that is surely guarding our stockpile when you could get it for a price just by asking in some parts of the world.  \n\nThe United States will forever maintain a nuclear arsenal for strategic purposes.  It is impossible to believe that if we took the lead and destryoed every one that we had, that the rest of the world would follow suit.  We'd be left unprotected, and the threat of Mutually Assured Destruction--one of the main reasons the Cold War went the way it did--would be eliminated, leaving us naked and extremely vulnerable.  We maintain them anymore as defense, though I truly believe that in this political climate, we will never see the day that the U.S. fires an offensive nuclear attack...I think defensive may even be a stretch.  \n\nThe reason that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons is simple.  They have made their intentions known, and I truly believe that it is simply a matter of time before they place one on top of a missile and fire one into Israel, and one into Iraq (to wipeout any remaining U.S. and coalition forces).  While some believe that Iran is bluffing, and claim that they do not have the technology, I'll leave the bluffing to the poker players, and take the threat of a nuclear weapon coming out of Iran in the near future as a very serious one.
216993
IRANIANS WILL BE CANNON FODDER. \nIRAN WAR IF IT EVER HAPPENS WILL BE A WAR NOT THE NAMBY PAMBY BATTLE THAT'S GOING ON IN IRAQ. \nALL OUT OPEN WARFARE IRAN HAS NO CHANCE. \nNOT ONE OF THE IRANIAN MILITARY PLANES COMES CLOSE TO THE US MILITARY PLANES. \nAS YOU MAY HAVE SEEN IN IRAQ THEIR TANKS AND YOURS WERE NO MATCH FOR THE COALITION FORCES TANKS. \nDONT LET YOUR LEADERS TAKE YOU DOWN A ROAD YOU CERTAINLY HAVE NO CHANCE OF RETURNING FROM. \nALL OUT WAR IS TOTAL.
309908
Nothing will happen.  Yes, that's right absolutely nothing.  All countries in that Region and many parts of the world just want to put up a perceived threat of retalliatioin of if you mess with them.  They see Isreal with Nuclear weapons, so they just want a deterant as well.  I mean run through the scenario, Iran attacks Isreal with a nuclear weapon, Isreal retaliates and deystroys Iran.  Other countries attacks Isreal again, Isreal attacks them.  These people aren't dumb.  They know that if they attack someone, they'll have severe cosequences.  India and Pakistan haven't destroyed each other yet.   And besides, as soon as the Iranians get their nukes ready, the CIA will send in a team to assinate the Iranian leaders.  (That's if Isreal doesn't get to them first).
621212
I think we shouldn't give up diplomatic efforts until a) it is clear  that diplomatic efforts won't work or b) we are convinced that Iran is just using the delay to press full speed ahead towards a weapons program.\n\nHowever, from what I hear from the EU as well as the US, b) isn't far away, unfortunately.
85050
I don't see anything happening over Iran too soon.  Any US president would be insane to start a war with Iran and should be sent to a psychiatric facility immediately.  The EU and NATO definitely won't do anything to piss the Iranians off, Iran has missiles that are within range of their countries.  The UN doesnt have the balls to do anything either (plus you have Russia and China who'll oppose a lot on the Security Council).  Frankly, I think Israel is the only one who can be counted on to do anything at all--which in their case is going to be military action.  That, sadly, is going to drag us (the U.S.), if not Europe, in as well.
14615
You're just playing with us Jim; you don't want to nuke anybody anymore than you want them to nuke you. The real question is should we use cruise missiles to destroy Iran's nuclear reactor/s like Israel did with jets back in '81 to Iraq's reactor/s because they were making the bomb too?\n\nAnswer: No to the nukes, Yes to surgical strikes with cruise missiles, which I believe will eventually happen, unless Israel beats us to it!
286941
you don't understand the situation. US believes Iran will use it's nuclear technology to build nuclear weapons. Iran is using it for energy and Iran is allowing UN to inspect it's nuclear facilities. Only why there is a controversy is because US believes Iran will attack Israel with nuclear weapons and US is putting on the pressure to make sure Iran does not have any nuclear weapons.
112229
They have been at civil war in the middle east on some level, since before recorded history. It is their way of life. They teach their children to butcher people. They have killed each other with sticks, spears, machine guns, and bombs. If Iran has its way, they will soon be killing with the atom!
296469
Did US find nukes in Iraq? Do you think USA is right? How many more dead soldiers (iraqies/iranian/american) will stop wars?  USA will not nuke iran.
246505
Viva, Kabobb, people like you would get us killed. Iran doesn't deserve nuclear weapons. \nLet's put it this way. You have an enemy who you know hates you with a burning passion, I mean wants you dead and would probably roll around jubilantly in your blood. Now, let's say you learn that they're aquiring a bomb, they say they just want it for decoration in their front yard, modern art, but you know they only want to blow up your house, killing you and your entire family. Now, would you say, "Oh, they deserve to have that bomb, it's just for decoration. They even let people inspect their home to prove they weren't going to actually use the bomb"?\nBe honest, would you still be saying that?
411631
Iran has no weapons of mass destruction but it has oil.  It might suffer the same fate as Iraq.
650216
soon, it definitely depends on Iran - if Iran does not comply and keeps going for nuclear weapons, we will be invading Iran for sure.  \n\nNear-term Iran, However I think China down the road may be WWIII if there ever is one.