How can i write a persuasive argument fro Scout to convince Mr. Ewell that he should be more just. I must use facts and details from the book. Can anyone give me some arguement with them? I need to put self in scout's position and try to convince Mr. Ewell to accept the point ofview? Thank you
121210
Talk about how the evidence obviously proves Tom Robinson wrong...
525562
It would not help you to tell you which chapter I identified most with, since you are different than me.  We probably have different tastes about what we like as well.\n\nI would suggest that you read the book for yourself [it's not long at all] and answer these questions yourself.  In this way you can defend your choices when asked, instead of stealing someone else's work.\n\nGood luck!
395435
There are some very good facts on this website:http://www.kent.k12.wa.us/staff/PollyRegnart/writing_folder/controversy/michelle.htm.  For you conclusion you can just restate previous points of your essay. BE creative on your cover sheet, make it appealing. If you really cant find what you need online go to the nearest library and ask around for smoking books, you can find almost everything in a library. Just make sure if your persuading keep it strictly on your point. especially in the conclusion.
237962
1.point of view :Scout narrates in the first person, telling what she saw and heard at the time and augmenting this narration with thoughts and assesments of her experiences in retrospect. Although she is by no means an omniscient narrator, she has matured considerably over the  years and often implicitly and humorously comments on the naïveté she displayed in her thoughts and actions as a young girl. Scout mostly tells of her own thoughts but also devotes considerable time to recounting and analyzing Jem’s thoughts and actions.(taken from sparknotes.com)\n2.Maycomb county\n3.The town believes that a mad person named Boo Radley lived inside.People said he went out at night when the moon was high and peeped in windows....Any stealthy crimes commited in Maycomb were his work.And so on.You are right.it was due to gossips.\n4.They thought that he once, while cutting articles out of the newspaper for his scrapbook, plunged his pair of scissors into his father's leg.Jem also believes that Boo had died and was stuffed up the chimney.And so on...\n5.It is YOUR impression....I personally don't know.\n6.The way they talk,of course...\n\n7.championship?\n\n8.You never really understand a person until you climb into his skin and walk around in it.(consider things from their point of view.)\n9.Of course.But there should be more of his type of character today.\n\n10.He wouldn't.He asks them not to torment Boo Radley.\n\n11.She is trustworthy and does not gossip like the other women in town.She is honest and upright like Atticus.
384001
first decide what question you are going to answer about the encampment. We already know that it happened. Your question might be did it have a positive or negative effect on the war effort. \n\nYour introduction would state the facts about the encampment. So many men stayed were for how long a period of time under what conditions then ask the question that you have decided on as the last line.\n\nbody of the paper gives pros and cons about your question\n\nconclusion gives the data that you found persuasive and your answer.
479970
Is that a story??  Sounds like an essay...make it more casual, like truely teenager?  What's so fab about gym?  Sample:  \n\nInstead of:   Basketball, Volleyball, being in the Weight room, what’s not to like about PE? Throughout the year, we all do a lot of sports while we’re in PE, and do ALOT of reading and writing and reading in health! \n\nBasketball, vollyball, girls in shorts (or cute boys, w.e ur character's gender)...what's not to like about P.E?  All through the year, it never looses momentum.  From all those sports we get to play to A TON of reading, writing (notepassing) in health class, gym definitly rocks.  Except today...\n\n1)Forshadowing in 1st paragraph \n2) Gives your character personality.  If a kid in my school spoke like that, I'd be, well, terrified!
18358
If this a formal essay paragraph, stay away from idioms such as "pick of the bunch", "friend for all seasons", and "fair-weather one".\n\nDoes the prompt to this paragraph deal with religion or God?  If not, abstain from mentioning that.\n\nAs the other guy said, your conclusion should summarize what you said and restate your thesis, or main point.  You could possibly be relating each characteristic listed in your conclusion to a support previously mentioned, but those don't relate too well.\n\nAnd don't use big words when nice, smaller ones will do.  When people see big words such as cordiality and magnanimity, they just think "huh?" and move on.\n\nExplain your support a little better and clearer.  What does it mean to have one's "moral principles" "in conformity with each other so you have the minimum contrast"?\n\nIf you're going to say a proverb, be sure to explain it and how it supports your thesis.\n\nGood luck editing and hope this helps!
393704
There's no right answer but that's what I'd say.\nI' d say that outside the courthouse, Mr Cunningham went with the others not because it was what he believed but because it was what everyone else believed and what he thought he should believe - he was blinded from the truth.\nIt took Scout talking to him normally and casually that made him see sense - see what he was doing and the consequences of it. She made him think about his own son and it was then that he realised how what eh was doing was wrong. Just like he had a son, Atticus had children and it's not just about hurting Atticus because he's trying to conform to the town's racist ways. There's a bigger picture, and if he did something to Atticus, he would be doing something to two young children's Father as well.\nSo Scout reminding him of his Son, made him consider Atticus and the fact that he had a life of his own and children to care for etc.
191986
Do you need footnotes to write this argument?  Is it a paper assignment or debate? Your own mind is a great place to begin thinking outside of the box. Madison Ave. applauds this in advertising.Science applauds this in new discoveries. Point is, we all have a contribution.  make yours.
615019
welcome to the club sister.  I don't think you have a problem at all.  I think that you are a free thinking and open minded person.  It's when you feel that pressure to conform and be like everyone else and resist it, that you truly begin to gain a greater perspective of reality.  I suggest you read "the herd" chapter from Nietzsche's "Beyond Good and Evil".  This is the book in which the phrase was coined "God is dead".  Don't let that scare you.  What I think he really meant to teach was that organized religion and the God they invent is dead.  He challenges you, in the chapter entitled "the herd", to ask yourself if all these things that people are telling you that "God" has said are indeed from "God".  Or, are they something made up by leaders of church to influence the masses opinions to get a desired social result.  That result is control.  Don't let anyone but God control you.  He wouldn't force control on you.  He doesn't want to control you.  He offers suggestions and you choose freely.  To me though, all this damnation and hellfire are not products of Christ at all.  Christ is like the sweetest friend I have ever had.  I don't live right at all.  I have done bad things in my life.  Yet, he has never left me.  People, on the other hand, have behaved terribly...  and for that matter... so have I at times.  I decided that I would not be controlled by "the herd" either.  People will accuse you of rebellion.  Rebellion it may be, but against whom?  God?  I don't think so...  The "herd", definitely.  I had to separate myself from them, and while it is lonesome at times, it is at least free.  Knowing God should never feel like being in a social or political prison in which you are interrogated and punished.  They're like religious nazis and they have confused social control with God.  Welcome to freedom sister.  You may find groups that you "fit" with...  I never did.  This is the tragedy of the genuine individual.  Perhaps you should start your own "group" on yahoo groups.  If you do, let me know, and I will join.  This topic is certainly worthy of discussion.  Don't feel like you are alone.  There are many, many, people who have went through this...
417504
Persuasive essay is a writing that will convince your audience or reader....have a link that might help you out.\nClick it and check it out! Hope it will help you! GOOD LUCK! :)\nhttp://www.orangeusd.k12.ca.us/yorba/persuasive_writing1.htm
615806
To Kill a Mocking Bird (by Harper Lee) is written as from the perspective of an eight-year old girl - Scout.  \n\nAt this stage in the book, a new teacher, Miss Caroline Fisher, has already told Scout that her father should stop teaching her to read (although Scout is self-taught).  Miss Caroline and Scout were obviously on a collision course of sorts.\n\nAfter asking everyone who is having lunch at school to place their lunch at the front, Miss Caroline realises that Walter Cunningham has not brought his forward.  She pretty much forces him to say he had forgotten it, and then proceeds to offer him a quarter in order for him to buy his lunch - with the proviso that he returns the quarter the following day.  The Cunninghams are dirt poor farm people, and Walter never brings lunch to school, and certainly could never repay cash to Miss Caroline, so she has to keep prompting him to come and get the quarter.  He won't budge.  Everyone else is local and knows the circumstances of Walter's family ... and uneasily they say:\n\n"Go on and tell her, Scout".\n\n"I turned round and saw most of the town people and the entire bus delegation looking at me.  Miss Caroline and I had conferred twice already, and they were looking at me in the innocent assurance that familiarity breeds understanding."\n\n++++++++++\n\nI hope the above is of help.
155244
Ok - here we go.  Basically, you want to argue your main point (or thesis) by giving 3 (sometimes more or sometimes less, but 3 is "typical") main reasons why what you are saying is "right".  \n     Let's say I want to argue that walking is good for you.  Okay, the first paragraph is what most people would call an "introductory" paragraph.  In this paragraph, you would basically introduce what your main point is and then you would add in what your main three points are...but you would do this in a way that would stretch it out to where its not just one sentence (because this is a paragraph we are talking about here).  A good starter sentence I always use is "When most people hear the word [BLANK], many words come to mind, such as [BLANK BLANK and BLANK], but what many do not know is that [BLANK] is actually [BLANK]."  Get the point?  You have to stretch it out some.  Lure the reader in, if you will.  \n     So then after your intro paragraph, you would introduce your first point (which you already mentioned in the intro paragraph).  Then after you mention your first reason why you are "right", you back it up with some FACTS.  You wouldn't say "I believe walking is good for you because my friend Judy said it was.  So there."  You would have to go and look at some RESOURCES such as a dictionary, encyclopedia, TRUSTED news sites on the internet, TRUSTED books and other medias from your public/school library, and also, perhaps interviews with people who are "authorities" on the subject.  So, let's say your first reason you think walking is good for you is because it lowers your blood pressure.  You then would have to say that the BlahBlah Encyclopedia or Yahoo News reported that walking has been proven by doctors at Columbia University that walking lowers blood pressure.  You could also use your mom's interview if she said that that walking personally lowered her blood pressure.  And you would just prove prove prove using FACTS (that's how you win any arguement, if you ask me).   \n     So then, after you have done this with all three reasons why you are "right", you then do your 5th paragraph which is what most people call the "conclusion" paragraph.  You just "wrap up" everything you just said and maybe add a little personal opinion or a little little quote.  Something to "jazz" it up...this is to keep the reader interested until the very end.  This is also called a "clincher".  \n     Hope this helped some.
236503
How is it you were able to write that qusetion without it being censored? You definately get points for that.\n\nAs for your question, I agree.  Unfortunately we can't control other people or make them be nice.  The only thing we can do is forgive them.  Forgiving someone doesn't make them any less wrong, and it doesn't mean we have to start liking the person, but it does set us free so that we don't have to walk around pi$$ed off all of the time.  So basically we have a choice.  We could forgive and be happy, or not forgive and let the bastards get us down.
441081
This is a wonderful quote - I'm so happy you posted it. Seems contradictory, doesn't it? How could someone who wants to lead be willing to have no one to lead? The best answer I can think of is to consider what people you would be most willing to "follow." Would it be a person like Mr "A," who makes it a point of letting you know that he thinks his way is the best and insists that you support him, or Ms "B," who simply decides on what she thinks is the best course of action and pursues it, even if no one else goes along with her?
265532
http://www.rscc.cc.tn.us/owl&writingcenter/OWL/Argument.html
263303
In high school I wrote a paper on how much I hated Holden. He really is a prick when you think about it.\n\nI'd suggest writing a dialogue between two of the members of Holden's fencing team.