I'm looking for educated opinions please
134645
Actually, the US Supreme Court has NOT addressed warrantless wiretaps as they are being done by Bush. To the contrary, the Supreme Court has said (see Hamdi v. Rumsfeld) that the current poltiical situation is "not a blank check" for the President to do anything he wants, regardless of existing laws.\n\nIn fact, there are two reasons why warrantless wiretapping is not authorized, and is explicitly illegal under specific laws that were intended to cover this exact situation.\n\nFirst, FISA passed by Congress thirty years ago explicitly states the conditions under which surveillance can be conducted, and was passed specifically to address monitoring of US citizens communicating with people in another country, where one or more were suspected of being a threat. FISA requires that even in an emergency, the wiretapping agency get a warrant from a judge within 72 hours AFTER the tap is initiated. This defeats any argument made about their not being enough time to act within the bounds of law, and Bush has admitted that he's never even applied for the warrants afterwards in an attempt to obey with the law.\n\nInterestingly, some of big names opposing FISA being passed thirty-years ago include Bush Sr., Rumsfeld and Cheney. So, they were told, by Congress explicitly, that they ideas about inherent presidential authority were wrong. So, not only is Bush breaking the law, but he's breaking a law that was specifically set up to govern this very action, after his top advisors were told what the law was in this exact situation.\n\nSecond, there is the ridiculous claim that Bush is acting under the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF), which the administration argues implicitly allows such actions. However, the AUMF is two paragraphs long, and states only that Bush is authorized to send military troops to Afghanistan, pursuant to the War Powers Act.\n\nWhat does the War Powers Act say? It limits presidential authority to send troops or deploy domestic assets unless authorized by Congress (since only Congress can declare war, and only Congress has jurisdiction for making domestic laws). The War Powers Act also specifically says that the President does not get any implied powers under this law, and that the President must obey all existing laws even when exercising explicit powers.\n\nYou can't claim implied powers based on a law that says "no implied powers". That's basic legal theory 101. It's like trying to argue it doesn't count as treason because the traitor chooses to call it something else. Performing actions that explicitly breaking laws that were intended to cover this exact situation is breaking the law, pure and simple.
235335
There is a large veriety of people out there.  This gives you a chance to pick out the answers that suit you.  Good luck.
279753
Learn to take this a bit less seriously, dear. Your opinions certainly aren't hurting anybody and who knows, you might just connect with someone.  \n\nAs for what you may or may not be learning here, you seem to suspect that you're merely confirming what you already believe.  Someone once observed that this is what most of us mean when we talk about education (sorry, wish I could remember who).  Just asking the question, though, shows that you are trying to think for yourself, which is always commendable.  \n\nSo take a break, and relax.  You're doing fine.
645191
I'm not sure what you want here.\nAre you asking individuals to tell you about their shopping styles and buying preferences? Or are you asking people to give you ideas on where you can formally research these topics?
16690
There is a contributor named Rob Wallace that you might want to do a search on (a few recent postings).\n\nI would be interested on your take of my study below Nik.
14409
There are a lot of books written on these topics but choosing the best one would take a lot of time. There is a program called NEWSTART that is a well rounded program and addresses each of the areas in your question. The web address is: www.newstart.com \nCheck it out. I think you will find what you are looking for.
183247
I think you are very open minded and willing to allow others to voice there opinion without inciting them.  I think you try to see both sides of an issue and could probably argue either side if you wanted to.\n\nBut to answer your question, you trust Bush about as far as you can throw him.\n(is that good enough for ten?)
290199
try this. the 2nd is really informative and may help.i'll keep looking.
234151
I am an expert in expertise. I also have a general knowledge of general knowledge. I think my preference is the pursuit of excellence in the field of excellence so I would have to say I would be an expert in expertology, that would be my preferable preference.
284767
Nutrition is very complex, and too important for a few tips from people you've never met and aren't experts on this type of thing (me included). Get information from as close to the source as possible. Reading studies is exhausting and let's face it, no one's gonna do that. A nice compromise is to buy or borrow a new of used copy of \n\nFats that Heal\nFats that Kill\n\nby Udo Erasmus. It's worth it's weight in platinum. Very objective and quite balanced in my view.\n\nI think if you read (future or past tense) the book, you'll give this "Best Answer"
519034
Social Conditioning.*( please read all before you send Ricin in the post!)\nWe are compelled, as we put up with the same old moans and witterings from you wimmin!!\nYes Dear\nNo Dear\nI'm trying to find it dear but it smells.\n\nThank God for Eurosport.\n\n*My dear susie says it's because blokes hang on to the past and look back rather than forward. I told her to shut up, bath the dog and go get me a six pack from the Offie!!!\n\nJoke guys, honest!\n\nI really think blokes do like a rose tinted view of life and a fave movie will compound that view. Me, I love bikes and mini's (real ones, not the BMW imposters of recent years) and therefore have very polarised views on those subjects. Blokes have attitude and conditioned views whereas women have a more sympathetic but blinkered (towards blokes) view of blokey things but an EMPATHIC view of Lady probs. B4 you all give me grief, we have been happily married for 19 yrs and Susie agrees with all of the above!!\n\nEdit; Sue says I have to tell you that I am a daft old sod and I tell her I luv her loads most days. \nBugger.\nBang goes the macho "Scr3w U" image!!!!!
349941
I think this is a great place to be. There are 2 different sides to this site. The first is very serious. People ask questions from Why is my 2 year old so bad.....to Why does my vagina have such a strong odor. These people are serious and post their questions under the proper places and are looking for real and good answers.\n\nThe second side is the more playful and fun side. This usually occurs in the polls and surveys area and such. The questions are silly sometimes....some are just there to quell people's curiosity....some are funny.....some you really have to think about.....\n\nBoth sides are great. I think answers is a great place to be. We all need tho to ignore the abusers. Try not to play into their games. They are looking for attention. I know sometimes you cant help it. Sometimes I let a good rant off at them. But then I don't for a while. \nI hope this helped you. Have a great night!
539209
Review the following:\n\nhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/southalabamascan/\n\nhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/n_alscan/
258702
People have given you specific ideas.  The point is to find something controversial.  I find it best if I select something I feel strongly about and then argue from the opposite side of the issue.  I learn more and I have less tendency to allow my emotions to cloud the paper.\n\nGood Luck on your final.
66514
I wanted to balance out the viewpoints on the answers for you. please check out the links.
138475
Nice generalisation. The sharing of true facts can never harm people, But i do have to kind of agree with you on the reason some of the questions are asked. I would hope that people use common sense and answer the more risky questions with tact and diplomacy, With knowledge comes responsibility
513953
My dear friend, I can guess you are somebody who is eager to learn. Well every website around you have something to offer, because the web itself is educative enough. Meanwhile, GOOGLE is there to offer you a lot on the various topics you might want to learn about.  BRAINCHECK.NET is there also. Clicking education in any search area of any web will expose you to alot of topics. KEEP CLICKING, AND KEEP READING, YOU WILL GET WHAT YOU WANT ANY TIME. KNOWLEDGE IS WEALTH.