All answers to my last question were exelent. Hint: this too is a leading question.  If you remain patient, you may help me resolve a long term question I have yet to hear a sat. answr too. honestly not sarcasim or trickery intended.
123337
This is a good question, and is the basis behind the theory of statistical thermodynamics. \n\nWhen you roll one die (i'm assuming a standard, fair,  six sided die) the probability of getting any particular number is 1/6. That is pretty obvious, each number is equally likely.\n\nInteresting things start to happen when you roll multiple dice however. Lets take all the possible outcomes for rolling two standard dice.\n\nDie 1   -   Die2   -   Total\n  1          1           2\n  1          2           3\n  1          3           4\n  1          4           5\n  1          5           6\n  1          6           7\n  2          1           3\n  2          2           4\n  2          3           5\n  2          4           6\n  2          5           7\n  2          6           8\n  3          1           4\n  3          2           5\n  3          3           6\n  3          4           7\n  3          5           8\n  3          6           9\n  4          1           5\n  4          2           6\n  4          3           7\n  4          4           8\n  4          5           9\n  4          6           10\n  5          1           6\n  5          2           7\n  5          3           8\n  5          4           9\n  5          5           10\n  5          6           11\n  6          1           7\n  6          2           8\n  6          3           9\n  6          4           10\n  6          5           11\n  6          6           12\n\nNow each die is independent of the other one. This means that getting 1-6 is a different result to getting 6-1. Thus it's easy to see that there are 36 possibile outcomes as shown above (6*6). Take a look at the totals of the outcomes though.\n\nThe first total i've written down is '2'. This comes from getting a 1 and another 1. You'll notice that this total does not appear anywhere else at all. The only possible way to get a total of 2 is if you get a 1 on both dice.\n\nAlso look at the last total, '12'. This is from getting a 6 and another 6, and is also the only place you'll see this total. There is only 1 possible way to get 12 as a total.\n\nHowever if you look at the total '7', you'll notice this appears 6 times. There are 6 different ways to get a 7 (1-6, 2-5, 3-4, 4-3, 5-2, 6-1). Therefore you are 6 times more likely to get a total of '7' than you are to get a total of either '1' or '12'! If you were to plot the average score received after rolling the two dice and plot them on a probability distribution curve (just graph the average scores along the bottom with the probability of getting that score up the side) you will see that it starts of with a low probability for getting an average of 1, rises to a peak at getting an average of 3.5, and then drops back to a low probability got getting an average of 6.\n\nNow with two dice there is still a reasonably good chance of scoring an average of 1, and a reasonably good chance of scoring an average of 6 (you'll see it happen every now and then if you roll the dice for a few minutes), but what happens if we go to 3 dice? Well the number of possibile outcomes is multipled by 6 (don't worry, I won't list them all!) But you'll notice there is STILL only 1 possible way of getting an average score of '1' (1-1-1). And there is STILL only one possible way of getting an average score of '6' (6-6-6). Therfore, the probability of you getting these numbers as an average of rolling 3 dice is much less than with two. Also the probability of getting an average of 3.5 is much higher (i'll leave that to the reader to confirm). If you plot the results for 3 dice onto the probability curve you'll notice that it is a bit steeper. It still has it's peak at 3.5, but it is much sharper.\n\nThe really interesting things happen when you go to large numbers of dice. Imagine that you have one die for every atom in a sample of some substance. Ther
388739
Not that far along im my training to honestly answer that, but you could always call your doctor and ask him before you even have the test.  I don't know any doctor who wouldn't give you a straight answer to your first question.
196519
The whole Maxman group is bogus.  They are just selling an herbal supplement.  Now they admit that they won't provide miracles, but I want to emphasis that nothing they are providing will has really been tested to show any real results.  I would recommend a multi vitamin, healthy diet, plenty of exercise, and eliminate any smoking if you want that maximum blood flow to certain parts of your anatomy.
236992
I'm sorry but I can't make heads or tails out of your post.  It is not clear and very confusing.  Since I can't help, due to the lack of clarity, please call your doctor tomorrow and talk to him/her.
609879
Well again medical questions are a lot like religion questions. No one knows the answer. I would recommend not using the Cypher Stent. All the medicines that these mad scientists invent are a gamble. Seems like there are never any problems until it is to late to fix the problems they have caused...Amazing how they get away with it.
132739
gosh again i answer 1 of ur questions:)\n\nthis one will be even shorter as the previous! \nLook at your own heart, do want to lie to get ahead?
28264
It because of craps. Some people disagree with this. New research has been done with this. You can find the new research with simple searches on Yahoo
163063
I don't keep numbers of this sort, but I do read the newspaper, daily.  Two days ago, the army indicated that it had surpassed it's last recruiting quota.  All of the other services have had no trouble meeting quota.  The army has always had the biggest challenge because of it's size,  I believe the army may have relaxed some of its criteria for recruitment.  This certainly would have helped it to achieve its numbers.  No, this isn't a guess, unless the newspapers are getting bad info.
529765
Well I can't find the site you were on but Orthosiphon is just an herb that company's are putting into there weight loss pills. If they are not giving you a lot of info on the product I would stay away from it. If you want a recommendation I did some research and I right now am taking lipo6 from nutrex. I have not been taking the recommended doses cause it strong stuff and I am trying to get use it to. I need to step up my work out but it seems to be working. Check out GNC.com and see what out there. You can get stuff there for like 40 buck and get it right away instead of waiting for shipping and paying for shipping
273834
Well, I certainly would have chosen to phrase my question differently, but on the whole, I agree.  While we're at it, can we zap everyone who posts any derivative of Pascal's Wager in an effort to convert the rest of us?  It pops up at least three times a day now.  \n\nIt was getting better around here, now it seems to be getting worse again.  Actually, I'd like to see a no preaching, no trying to convert rule myself.  Even here, it doesn't belong.  This is, after all, Yahoo Answers.  I don't recall signing up for Yahoo Sermons, do you?
64671
I don't know. I know I asked one question which may have sounded dumb to some of you who are so computer literate but I really wanted to know the answer and no one responded. Fortunately, I did find out what to do. I am sorry that your questions haven't always been answered. Maybe we don't know any good answers or the questions are too difficult. I will look for your questions next time.
248227
Hi! I'm sorry to hear that. 7 Of Spades and I are still praying for her. Are you her sister? I must tell you that I posted many pleas for prayer and I was sure to phrase it in there form of a question and I was STILL reported. Please be careful! If it isn't phrased to everyone's liking, someone will report you. My question was deleted because someone wouldn't show sympathy. Luckily, I posted many qs for her and received lots of answers. Sorry, I misspelled her name. My source was very upset when he typed it and I used what was given.
92158
omg you answered yourself smart guy!\njust ask one at a time smart guy!\nor are you jst posting propaganda for boring sport after golf
332044
love your screename!!!! i have no idea if the etrog is as healthy as he says- i just shake it around...\nyou live in j-lem? maybe i know you... just kidding! lol!\n"happy" yom hazikaron!
669443
See a specialist. If you are a specialist, then you've got me worried. The following link will give you some info though (if you can understand it): - \n\nhttp://www.jpgmonline.com/article.asp?issn=0022-3859;year=1984;volume=30;issue=2;spage=105;epage=10;aulast=Khanna
124158
Hi, I'm skeptical as well.  But I thought I'd try it out.  I ordered it and it took almost 3 weeks to get.  I've been on it for two days and I've lost 4 lbs.  (not sure if this is coincidence or the product, too soon to tell.)  I will try to get back and post again at the end of my first week on it.
171964
Please consult a physician or at least do research someplace other than here.  Your questions are too important to rely on random people who may or may not provide you with reliable information.