industry in tanay,rizal philippines
132711
The Official website of the Provincial Government of Rizal has a list of industries in that province\n\nhttp://www.rizalprovince.gov.ph/trade.html
461598
The islands have been known to be part of the Philippines Islands... and nobody cared. Now however, there is the possibility there maybe oil over there. Bringing China and Vietnam into the picture. In fact a few Filipinos actually lived there subsisting mostly by fishing. \n\nHistory has shown again and again that regardless of International Law, possession and power decides ownership. Witness Brunei, a possession of the Sultanate of Sulu and by extension the Philippines. This terrritory was rented in perpetuity by Great Britain for something like $30,000 Malaysian a year. The Philippines tried unsuccessfully to assert ownership thru the International Court. \n\nIf the pattern continues, then China will most likely prevail, unless the Philippines could creatively checkmate it.
639319
pedro escuro... siya yata ung nag introduce ng variety of rice.. i'm not so sure... now alm mo ba kng san pwede makhanap ng biographies ng filipino scientists?? need it immediately.......
110838
come here to the philippines!
8916
Hey check this out!!!! This the best site i've ever known abt Ramon Magsaysay....\n\nhttp://www.macapagal.com/dm/profile.htm
255785
G.R. No. L-44678 April 8, 1986\n\nFRANCISCO BALIGWAT, petitioner, \nvs.\nHON. COURT OF APPEALS and ALBINO ESTAVOS, respondents.\n\nRamon P. Mabanag for petitioner. \n\nDulcisimo Tampus for private respondent. \n\n \n\nPATAJO, J.:\n\nIn this petition for review of the decision of the then Court of Appeals dated July 20, 1976, petitioner, the tenant of private respondent over 1 1/2 hectares land devoted exclusively to coconut trees, seeks a ruling from this Court that personal cultivation by the landowner, one of the grounds for the dispossession of a tenant under Section 50 of Republic Act 1199, otherwise known as the Agricultural Tenancy Act of the Philippines, had been repealed by Section 7 of Republic Act 6389, and that, therefore, he could not be ejected from the landholding in question on the alleged ground that the landowner wanted to cultivate the land himself personally. The decision of the Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the Court of Agrarian Reforms which denied the motion to dismiss filed by petitioner of the complaint to eject him from the landholding in question, said Court holding that Section 7 of Republic Act 6389 amending Section 36 of the Code of Agrarian Reforms of the Philippines, Republic Act 3844 deleting personal cultivation by the lessor-owner as ground for dispossessing the tenant-lessee does not apply to coconut lands. \n\nThe undisputed facts of this case is stated by the Court of Appeals in its decision subject of the present petition for review as follows: \n\nDefendant Francisco Baligwat is the tenant of plaintiff Albino Estavas over one and one-half hectares of his coconut land in Pualas, Tubod, Lanao del Norte, Estavas wanted to eject Baligwat because he wanted to cultivate the land personally, so he notified the defendant of his desire to personally cultivate the land one year before he filed this case on April 4, 1972 by sending a letter (Exhibit 'B') written on February 7, 1971, addressed to the defendant at Pualas, Tubod, Lanao del Norte. He mailed that letter by ordinary mail and the defendant received it through the Barrio Captain. He also complied with the requirements of law to inform the Court regarding his desire to personally cultivate the land as shown by a copy of the notice he filed in Court, (Exhibit 'C') received on February 15, 1971 (Exhibit 'C-l').\n\nAfter one year, he sent another letter to the defendant re-minding him that after February, 1972, the latter was to vacate the premises (Exhibit 'D'). Because the defendant did not vacate the premises, plaintiff filed his petition in this case on April 4, 1972 (Exhibit 'E'). \n\nEstavas wanted to personally cultivate the land because he had no job and he has had experience as farmer of the coconut land of his father. The entire area of the coconut land is 26 hectares. The tenanted area of the said land is one hectare and a half. Plaintiff has four children all of majority age, with children of their own. He wants to cultivate personally the area of one and a half hectares use the rest of the 26 hectares are cultivated by his children who are all farmers, including the only one of them who is employed and who visits the place every month. Four hectares of the land were acquired by his wife and the other portions were acquired by him and his wife. He has a house on the land in question. Three of his children have their own houses on the portions of land they are occupying and cultivating. \n\nWe are in full agreement with the holding of the Court of Appeals upholding the Court a quo that insofar as coconut lands are concerned, personal cultivation by the owner-lessor, a ground for dispossession of the tenant-lessee under Section 50 of Republic Act 1199, is still a valid ground for dispossession of a tenant. This is so because Section 35 of Republic Act 3844 expressly provides that with respect to lands principally planted to citrus, coconuts, cacao, durian and other similar permanent
556732
There has been a lot of Development work being carried out in the area, by the various government and private institutions. The roads have been widened and smoothened. A lot of malls have come up in the area providing employement opuurtunities to many people.
180721
Nestlé Philippines Inc.\nFrits VAN DIJK
28816
http://www.senate.gov.ph/senators/sen13th.htm
530476
which country?\n\nif you are interested in the Philippine Civil Engineering Board Exam, just click on this link...\n\nhttp://www.prc.gov.ph/examresults.asp?svc_id=3&prof_id=0600&isfiltered=1&pid=41&selected_date=0506\n\nSee how generous I am...
322489
its The Republic of the Philippines.
144254
Inquire from the Philippine Games and Amusement Board. Here is their website http://www.gab.gov.ph/
124980
wahahahaha... klangan k rin yan!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!\ntga AU k noh???\nwahahahahaha............ang HIRAP maghnap sa NET!!
414949
Consider CCA:\nhttp://www.cca-manila.com/campus.htm\n\nYou will find a lot of choices here:\nhttp://www.worldculinaryinstitute.com/cgi-bin/odp/index.cgi?base=%2F%52%65%67%69%6F%6E%61%6C%2F%41%73%69%61%2F%50%68%69%6C%69%70%70%69%6E%65%73%2F%45%64%75%63%61%74%69%6F%6E%2F\nGood luck!\n\ncc
412733
just last saturday night...imbestigador featured a really big scare: filthy brown sugar!\n\ni would like to suggest that you investigate the following staples that have been repacked and sold in the common "palengke" or market place in the philippines these days and see whether or not these are clean or at least edible :-):\n1. all other brands of brown sugar\n2. soy sauce\n3. mayonaise\n4. margarine\n5. salt\n6. others\n\ngood luck...
91640
try caylabne bay in cavite, very nice place.
588904
Spend some tim browsing this search engine specific to chemical industry\nhttp://www.icissearch.com/\nThey have most of the answers you're looking for.