right ive seen somthing really disturbing on ebay: WAS THE WORLD TRADE CENTRE BROUGHT DOWN WITH EXPLOSIVES?\n2 DVD's\n(http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/9-11-Twin-Towers-was-it-brought-down-with-explosives_W0QQitemZ9124601040QQcategoryZ80022QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem)\n\nfirst of all this is horrible not only for th families but also for every1 that has had to deal with th consequences\n\nbut who is selling this dvd? - cud it b terrorists raising their funds or cud it be the truth?\n\nYour thoughts please
125175
Yes, the world trade center was brought down by explosives.\nThis was visible to anybody with a serious knowledge of demolitions from the images taken by the victims at ground level. The building fell too easilly, too smoothly, didn't\ntumble, didn't veer to one side. You can see the explosives taking out every few floors in slow motion.\n\nIn all probability the world trade center was demolished by the bush administration.\n\nAs an aside, the idea that the fuel of those planes could have caused the collapse is total nonsensical fiction. The physics say theres not enough energy. And one of the planes\nblew up 95 percent of its fuel against the side of the building. Also interesting are the buildings demolished by explosives hundreds of feet away from the towers.\n\nThere is an entire movement on the internet called the 911\ntruth movement that has been bringing attention to this for years. Eventually history will show that 911 was the Bush administrations "riestagg fire". The excuse they needed to justify the wars they wanted to have.
217671
Bravo!  I commend you for opening your eyes to the situation.  Prisonplanet should provide you with excellent links to great websites regarding building 7.  I also suggest watching "Loose change".  You can view it for FREE on Google video.
528847
I truly appreciate this question. \n\nTo all those who give the token thumbs down to a question like this, or use the juvenile retort of "conspiracy-nut job," please, take some time to seriously analyze the unanswered questions surrounding the 9/11 attacks. \n\nInterestingly, the burden of proof is no longer on the "conspiracy theorists" but on those who have stood by the government's official claim that 19 hijackers with box-cutters financed by Bin Laden, crashed 4 planes without any chance of prevention. \n\nThe following is irrefutable: \n\nFact: Bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. Check out the FBI website. Reason? They don't have sufficient evidence to convict him. Perhaps this is why Bush said he really doesn't care about him. \n\nFact: There are hundreds of televised claims from that day that witnesses heard or felt explosions prior to the collapse of the towers.  These include firefighters, police, newsreporters, and civilians. \n\nFact: 47 story - WTC 7, we are told, collapsed from fire alone. This was unprecedented for a steel frame building. Furthermore, it fell symetrically in free fall speed. Science and deductive reasoning will easily support the cause of this collpase as demolitions. Fire does not have the energy to do this.  \n\nFact: The steel from WTC was shipped overseas before an investigation was even opened. This is the greatest destruction of evidence in the history of forensics. \n\nFact: Thousands of first responders have been afflicted and some have even died from respiratory failure. The government will not support investigations into the many reports which show that these heroes have micronized steel, glass, and concrete in their lungs. Fire, and the collapse from gravity would not produce this type of dust. Demolitions, however, supports the evidence. \n\nFact: We were told that NORAD didn't intercept any of the planes that day. This spans from about 8:24, the time of the first report of a hijacking, to 10:06, when the last plane crashed in Penn. NORAD's has a prior track record of intercepting planes within minutes. Standard Operating Procedure was not followed that day. They also changed their story several times. \n\nFact: The investigation into 9/11 was initially opposed by the Bush Administration. The 9/11 families pressed for one. They got it, but with remarkable conditions. The total costs of the investigation, including the NIST report, was only $16 million. The cost to investigate the Space Shuttle crash - $50 million. The cost to investigate Clinton - $42 million. In other words, the greatest failure of our defenses deserved less money than the shuttle and Clinton's perjury. What an insult to the 9/11 families. \n\nFact: No one has been fired for 9/11. \n\nFact: The spike in put options on Boeing, United Airlines, and American Airlines were never investigated. Millions are still unclaimed. This indicates someone knew. Why not check out this lead? \n\nFact: The August 6, 2001 Public Daily Briefing Memo was titled BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE IN THE US. Yet prior to its declassification, we were told by Rice and Fleisher that there were no warnings. Had this news been made public, couldn't travelers, law enforcement, and the airline workers  have been a little more guarded or informed to notice something that day? Wouldn't we have guessed right away that the first report of a hijacking was indeed a terrorist? Or would we have dismissed it as "one bad pilot" and continued to read "My Pet Goat" while America was attacked?\n\nThe bottom line - If the deaths of 3000 people occurred under the control of a corporation, people would have been brought up on charges of criminal negligence. Despite the growing movement and mounting evidence into the WTC collapses, the government still has made up its mind that it is fire that brought these buildings down and that 9/11 was simply a failure of imagination. Th
26778
Yes..I have seen the vid...makes ya go hmmm...certainly an out of ordinary video..it was seen and recorded in Mexico...there have been numerous reports...and until last year no video..It is truly hard to say what it is...but it is very strange...almost like a jet pack...but..who really knows for now..I prefer to keep an open mind on things and not assume until more proof is shown..but as I said..the vid is interesting to say the least.
305288
C’mon: Do you really think nineteen guys with box cutters were behind 9/11? Then why, when no steel-frame building had ever collapsed from fire, did three fall down that day? (One, 7 WTC, wasn’t even hit.) How could a terrorist’s passport emerge in perfect condition? Why was it so important to clear debris before all the bodies were recovered? Did the U.S. secretly plan the whole thing? The 9/11 conspiracy theorists have it all figured out.
385596
Any one who as seen the photos that were supplied to to the media  through various news outlets has to come to the sober conclusion that it was not a 737 airplane that hit the Pentagon.\n What is disturbing is why did they hold on to these videos for so long? Were their video experts "enhancing" it at the Pentagon all this time?
138919
HOLY COW...\n\nYour mind scares me tho.. I mean, I never thought of it but it seems like a real chance for someone to strike over.. I hope it won't happen.. but I think u think like a terrorist and need help :D!
55694
I won't attack.  I've opened my mind.  The motive, Martial Law.  This "attack" didn't happen exactly as it was supposed to, due to crossed signals.  Had that third plane hit the Capitol, George W. Bush would have had the rhyme and reason to declare martial law and have all of his "citizens" live in a police state.  Also, all of the footage from that horrible event shows people standing in the holes of the building, begging to be rescued.  Now, if this jet fuel was hot enough to melt steel and bring the towers down, how did people's human flesh survive long enough for them to plead that their lives be saved?  They were standing in Ground Zero, right were the planes hit.  How is it possible they didn't just burn up?  I'm sure I'll be attacked for my views, but I'm also sure I will be attacked by people who have never opened themselves up to the other side, who actually have no knowledge of the events themselves.
587572
bravo aurastin.  Just a few more to look at to help put an end to this junk:\n\nhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html\nhttp://wtc.nist.gov/\nhttp://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html
563050
I was willing to give this a reasonable chance until I read this:\n\nOne early morning in '99 Range was returing from Henderson when a low-flying craft dropped a trail right overhead along Boulder Highway. "It covered my car with a sticky web-like coating and I saved a specimen in a jar. Microscopic fiber-like filaments," Range reports\n\nWhat was the outcome of the analysis of this specimen?  If this happened in 1999 don't you think she would've taken it in for analysis by now?  \n\nAnd what does being over 25 have to do with anything?  Are all people over 25 blind or something?\n\nI live in NJ so I can't say that its completely untrue but, I find it hard to believe that so few people have come forward.  A lot of people live in Vegas, I would've expected more people to have said somethin by now and I would expect this to be national news if it were true.  People aren't as complacent as you think they are, when it has to do with their long term health and the health of their children, people are usually very vigilant.
637424
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html\nhttp://wtc.nist.gov/\nhttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/05/911_documentary_removed/\nhttp://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html\nhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html\n\nNow let's have a second try?  G'head, let's see where you go with it.
567789
People are going to believe what they want to believe.  I saw a plane crash into a building.  Was it real or was it created by Hollywood.  The only people that really know are the one's that were there.  Al Qaida has taken resposibility for the 911 attacks. So? Who do you think did it?
252441
I've seen all the videos like this. If you honestly believe that, you have some major issues you need to work out in your life. As bad as you think our President is, you must be able to comprehend he wouldn't do that, nor would he be able to get away with it. Don't believe everything you see on the Internet. Believe it or not, some of it's not true. There's an article written by Popular Mechanics called "Debunking the 9/11 myths". This was done by people that actually know what they are talking about-not some idiot in Mommy's basement-and published by a well-respected magazine. You can decide which you're going to believe but I think I'll go with the ones who do that stuff for a living.
534504
Good link.  Most of us cilvilized people would not approve of any of those methods.  Have you seen this link?\nhttp://www.obsessionthemovie.com/12min.htm\nBTW Urbangenie hasn't seen much news lately since some of that stuff was all over the news all over the world
90312
I was brought to tears when I saw the twin towers at the end of that film. of course 9-11 is an emotional subject, but i was broken up more because of the huge significance and symbolism of the scene. the movie is a beautiful illustration of how violence only begets violence, and showing the WTC just showed how until this cycle is broken, that events of 1947 will lead to events of 1972 will lead to events of 2001. i will never understand why people keep thinking that the solution to 9-11 and other attacks is the same, ridiculously ineffective reaction man always comes up with.  it is like repeatedly throwing gasoline onto forest fires and insisting every time that it is starting to put it out.
664717
This video is very compelling evidence that there's a lot more to the events of 9/11 than most people know.  A few of the things in the Loose Change video are inaccurate, but it compiles enough accurate information to lead to further questions.  \n\nTo the people who say things like "this has all been disproven" or "it's just conspiracy theories" you are fooling yourselves.  The famous philospher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) said “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident”.  People will believe any lie either because they want it to be true, or because they fear it is true.  The lie you are believing is that the official story of how the events of 9/11 occurred are true.  When you OBJECTIVELY analysis the scientific evidence -- as a detective or scientist would -- without injecting false patriatism into the equation -- you realize that it is simply physically impossible that things happened as we've been led to believe.\nAnd  as a side note, questioning the events of 9/11 is NOT unpatriotic.  On the contrary, it's about the most patriotic thing you can do.  We have a duty to defend this great nation of ours against ALL threats, foriegn AND DOMESTIC.  And the families of the victims of 9/11 have a right to know the TRUTH of how and why their loved ones died.  In that spirit, I present the following very small bits of information concerning the events of 9/11.\n\nYou can’t collapse a skyscraper with jet fuel.\nMany engineers have come forward and said that there’s no way those buildings fell from fire.  Steel doesn’t weaken until almost 2000 degrees F, and it doesn’t melt until almost 3000 degrees F.  Jet fuel doesn’t burn hot enough to do it.\nThe official NIST report states “The initial jet fuel fires themselves lasted at most a few minutes” and office material fires would burn out within about 20 minutes in a given location. (NIST, 2005; p. 179, emphasis added.)   The final NIST report on the Towers admits:  \n"Of the more than 170 areas examined on 16 perimeter column panels, only three columns had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250ºC… Only two core column specimens had sufficient paint remaining to make such an analysis, and their temperatures did not reach 250 ºC. ... Using metallographic analysis, NIST determined that there was no evidence that any of the samples had reached temperatures above 600 ºC."  (NIST, 2005, pp. 176-177) \nKevin Ryan, the engineer from the company that underwrote the towers, said it was impossible that a jet fuel fire brought the towers down.  The architect who designed the twin towers has repeatedly said that he designed them to take not 1, but 2, massive passenger airliner impacts and not fall.  \nPools of molten steel were found in the basements of the towers (including tower 7) weeks after 9/11.  Steel melts at 2777 degrees F.  Jet fuel burns at only 1577 degrees F.  It is literally impossible for jet fuel fires to get hot enough to melt steel into molten pools.  Something else must have done it.\n\nFirefighters and survivors said repeatedly that bombs were going off throughout the towers, on many different floors. Firefighters gave very specific descriptions of seeing flashes of light and explosions going off on the lower levels.   If you watch the news from that morning, you'll even see Fox news reporting a "4th explosion" going off in tower 1.   For instance, at the start of the collapse of the South Tower a Fox  News anchor reported:   “There is an explosion at the base of the building… white smoke from the bottom… something happened at the base of the building!  Then another explosion.”\nFirefighter Edward Cachia independently reported:  \n“[We] thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came
503165
Hello,\n\nYou know what, tonight I just watched the movie, "United 93", and at the end of the movie the producers had written some things about how the military were 100 miles away from the planes attacking the Twin Towers. \n\nOut loud I said, "We can thank President Clinton for closing all the military bases in that area. If they had been open, I am sure the military planes could have shot down the terrorists.\n\nBut then, I thought to myself, "Yeah right, this was all part of our governments plan to create a war and find our way into the New World Order."\n\nHope this helps you...................................................  :-)