or was it all a conspiracy theory cooked up by zogians from the 65th ectar galaxy
131880
Neither..I ate it!!!!
308845
This is nothing new...people have been carrying on about this place for the last 25 years...they supposedly have the bodies of the extra-terrestrials who crashed in Roswell NM back in 1947. In reality it's a secluded place where the military can play with it's new toys without the fear of prying eyes...it's a BIG base... oh and that Bob Lazar guy they mention has been discredited as a lying nut ball...he never worked there. Now that Area 51 has such a high profile, I imagine all the really secret stuff has been moved to a place that is actually still a secret.
584079
AS A HUGE FAN OF ESPIONAGE AND CONSPIRACY THEORIES, I WOULD SAY DEFINITELY YES. AS FOR FAR-FETCHED CRAP LIKE ALIENS AND STUFF, I DON'T BELIEVE THAT.
435802
no they did'nt....they showed in discovery they faked their trip to moon... made ass of all
125750
i do think that alians are real. the fact that they are for sure going to come and kill us all is not so likely... i think that there are alians millions and millions of miles away, after all, there are trilions of other worlds in space. there has to be at least ONE other place with life on it. maybe even closer than some people think. these alians could just be little one cell life forms that arent smart enough to build space ships and visit us.
49549
I watched an old episode of "Unsolved Mysteries" recently and asked myself the same question.  From this show it came to appear that there was substantial evidence to prove that the Roswell Theory from back then via a private memo was adequate but never became public.  Within that memo it stated that there was subsequent evidence to believe that an alien force had landed and died from being ejected from the craft.  but it also stated too that the craft looked that to be that of a blown down weather balloon.  Now if it was a coverup by our government, one will never know unless you were either there back in 1947, can get close to where they actually have them hidden today, and know who did the covering up of the story to prevent it from being publicized.  Plus we don't really know if they are amongst us right now.  If by some odd chance they are, these beings are either like us in actions and emotion or they are just figmented imposters to impose our brains into a non ethical world of panic.  I am sure someday it will all be evident but until then keep your fingers crossed that someone tells the truth.
326306
It was a conspiracy....by terrorists.  Duh....
520079
"...From my own intelligence work within the military, I can say WITH ALL CERTAINTY that one of the main reasons the public has been kept in total darkness about the reality of UFOs and 'aliens', is that the truth of the matter actually exists TOO CLOSE TO HOME TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT.  How could a spokesman for the Pentagon dare admit that five or ten thousand feet underground EXISTS AN ENTIRE WORLD THAT IS 'FOREIGN' TO A BELIEF STRUCTURE WE HAVE HAD FOR CENTURIES? How could, for example, our fastest bomber be any challenge to those aerial invaders when we can only guess about the routes they take to the surface; eluding radar as they fly so low, headed back to their underground lair?"\n\n"...the 'Greys' or the 'EBEs' have established a fortress, spreading out to other parts of the U.S. via means of a vast underground tunnel system THAT HAS VIRTUALLY EXISTED BEFORE RECORDED HISTORY..."\n\n--Milton (William) Cooper, ex-Naval Intelligence officer
235125
like saying it was caused by a large right wing conspiracy?
205224
Think about it, kiddo. Do you know how far we are from the nearest star? It would take generations of alien pilots on an uncertain journey to reach Earth. \n\nInterstellar flight is impractical, especially since they would have no way of knowing we would even be here.\n\nWhat you "came to know" was just another conspiracy theory pumped out by UFOLOGISTS or, as they are more commonly known, morons. \n\nUnless you see physical evidence of something so implausible, then you're just wasting your life on this stuff.
61527
Yes. Yes, yes, yes.\n\nOf all the things that people have made conspiracy theories out of, this has got to be one of the lamest. The moon landing hoax evidence is really lame.\n\nSo, yes.
384817
No, and that is a conspiracy theory in a conspiracy theory.
42075
the interesting thing is when you examine both of the stories...If there were aliens that crashed in Rosewell, then it makes sense that the government would put forth some type of a more credable story then the weather balloon one. If there really was a weather balloon crash in Rosewell, then there wouldn't have been such a big deal made out of the whole thing... That would lead one to the conclusion that, whatever it was that crashed in Rosewell was of some importance to the government. I would believe that it was a secret millitary test flight that went awry. What other theories are there?
500789
The same reason we heard FDR bombed Pearl Harbor, fake moon landing, Holocaust was a hoax, Mafia and/or Castro killed JFK, Area 51 reverse engineering of Roswell UFO, and that fossils were a conspiracy propagated by paleontologists.  There's always the feeble minded that will believe anything.  Look at the high percentage of the world (80%) who take as gospel the idea of a supernatural entity without a shred of evidence.
610137
It wasn't faked. I agree, the technology involved was bare bones but still capable. Here are some quotes that help counter some of the conspiracy theories:\n\nIn some photos, the crosshairs appear to be behind objects, rather than in front of them where they should be, as if the photos were altered.\n\n        * In photography, the light white color (the object behind the crosshair) makes the black object (the crosshair) invisible due to saturation effects in the film emulsion. The film particles that ought to have been black were exposed by light from the adjacent brightly lit particles. Ironically, this saturation effect would not happen if the crosshairs were drawn on in post, and so is evidence of genuine photos. Attempting to alter photos that already have crosshairs would make the compositing process far more difficult.\n\nThe quality of the photographs is implausibly high.\n\n        * The astronauts were trained in the use of their gear, and shots and poses were planned in advance as part of the mission. NASA selected only the best photographs for release to the public, and some of the photos were cropped to improve their composition. There are many badly exposed, badly focused and poorly composed images amongst the thousands of photos that were taken by the Apollo Astronauts. Many can be seen at the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal. Photos were taken on high-quality Hasselblad cameras with Zeiss lenses, using 70 mm medium format film.\n\nThere are no stars in any of the photos, and astronauts never report seeing any stars from the capsule windows. \n\n         *Stars are also never seen in Space Shuttle, Mir, International Space Station Earth observation photos, or even sporting events that take place at night. The sun in the Earth/Moon area shines as brightly as on a clear noon day on Earth, so cameras used for imaging these things are set for daylight exposure, with quick shutter speeds in order to prevent overexposing the film. The dim light of the stars simply does not have a chance to expose the film.\n\nhe color and angle of shadows and light are inconsistent.\n\n        * Shadows on the Moon are complicated because there are several light sources: the Sun, the Earth, and the Moon itself. \n\n The Moon's surface during the daytime is so hot that camera film would have melted.\n\n        * There is no atmosphere to efficiently couple lunar surface heat to devices such as cameras not in direct contact with it. In a vacuum, only radiation remains as a heat transfer mechanism. \n\nThe launch rocket produced no visible flame.\n\n        * Hydrazine (a fuel) and dinitrogen tetroxide (an oxidizer) were the Lunar Module propellants, chosen for their reliability; they ignite hypergolically –upon contact– without a spark. Hypergolic propellants happen to produce a nearly transparent exhaust. Hypergolic fuels are also used by several space launchers: the core of the American Titan, the Russian Proton, the European Ariane 1 through 4 and the Chinese Long March, and the transparency of their plumes is apparent in many launch photos.\n\nThe flag placed on the surface by the astronauts flapped despite there being no wind on the Moon.\n\n        * The astronauts were moving the flag into position, causing motion. Since there is no air on the Moon to provide friction, these movements caused a long-lasting undulating movement seen in the flag. There was a rod extending from the top of the flagpole to hold the flag out for proper display. The fabric's rippled appearance was due to its having been folded during flight and gave it an appearance which could be mistaken for motion in a still photograph.\n\nThese are only a few quotes. They all seem much more convincing then the arguments the conspiracy theorists present.
291198
I don't know if your question is serious or not, but if it is...from reading literature about UFOs and alien abductions, it seems like they were abducted by aliens. Only hypnosis will help them remember what happend during the two and half hours they don't remember.
273151
of course what you have seen is real and dont let any one to tell you otherwise.however there is debate among ufologist and et socities that black triangular ships are us secret military ships.this technology was given to them by a race of aliens called greys,however new evidence is suggesting this technology along with the design for stealth bomber(F117) was given to them by a race is called annunakies,i was lucky enough to see pleadian scout ship on two different ocasions.i can provide you with some clear pictures of ufo,and few race of ets who are well known to our open minded scientist.as far as NASA,they are fully aware of them and if you wish provide me with an email address so i can send you a few picture along with nasa footage of ufos from international space stations.a lot of scientists in nasa are fully aware of this.but information in this regard is being suppresed by big guys,if you are interested buy an ordinary telescope and spend a few nights watching moon.im sure you will see with your own eyes more than enough evidence of their existance,do a little bit of reaserch about et bases on the moon.keep wondering,you are in a right direction,may peace and love be upon you and your family