I mean, it doesn't say that they had any more children...
135947
One might think that after the murder of Abel, only his guilty brother Cain and their parents, Adam and Eve, were left on the earth. However, Adam and Eve had a large family. According to Genesis 5:3, 4, Adam had a son named Seth. The account adds: “The days of Adam after his fathering Seth came to be eight hundred years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters.” So Cain married his sister or perhaps one of his nieces. Since mankind was then so close to human perfection, such a marriage evidently did not pose the health risks that may imperil the offspring of such a union today.\n\nAdam was cast out of Eden into an unsubdued earth that was cursed to produce thorns and thistles, there to sweat out an existence, harvesting the bitter fruits of his sin. Outside the garden, awaiting death, Adam fathered sons and daughters, the names of only three being preserved—Cain, Abel, and Seth. To all of his children Adam passed on hereditary sin and death, since he himself was sinful.—Ge 3:23; 4:1, 2, 25.\n\nConsider, for example, the often-raised problem about Cain’s wife. At Genesis 4:1, 2 we read: “In time [Eve] gave birth to Cain and said: ‘I have produced a man with the aid of Jehovah.’ Later she again gave birth, to his brother Abel.” As is well known, Cain killed Abel; but after that, we read that Cain had a wife and children. (Genesis 4:17) If Adam and Eve had only two sons, where did Cain find his wife?\n\nThe solution lies in the fact that Adam and Eve had more than two children. According to the context, they had a large family. At Genesis 5:3 we read that Adam became father to another son named Seth and then, in the following verse, we read: “He became father to sons and daughters.” (Genesis 5:4) So Cain could have married one of his sisters or even one of his nieces. At that early stage of human history, when mankind was so close to perfection, such a marriage evidently did not pose the risks for the children of the union that it would today.\n\n\nSeth may not have been the third child of Adam and Eve. According to Genesis 5:4, Adam had “sons and daughters,” some of whom may have been born before Seth. Seth is worthy of note because Noah, and through him the present-day race of mankind, descended from him, not from the murderous Cain. At the age of 105 years Seth became father to Enosh. Seth died at the age of 912 years.
553080
I suggest that you read that love letter. For instance:\n\nAnd the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters\nGenesis 5:4\n\nAdam and Eve had at least 7 children. Cain, Abel, Seth, sons which means at least 2 more boys, and daughters which means at least 2 girls. They probably had many other children that are not listed because they are not needed in the geneology of Christ.
74733
no you can only count the one who actually had childcare
227213
Well, for the sake of humanity, let's hope not. What would their kids be like? ...Actually, they'd be kinda cute.
510348
Well now I see I'm not the only one that has thought about that very question.  I was telling my husband just the other night that didn't make any sense to me.  We're told how protected our children are  when they're in someone Else's care but it has to make you wonder about that one.
8062
If plants didn't have babies, there would be no new plants to replace the old ones when they died. Then, eventually, there would be no plants and you would not be able to ask that question. Instead you would ask why the plants didn't have babies. What was wrong with them?
37271
That is a shame. You need to figure out if this is the way of life you want for the children, if not than you need to move on.
604603
its suposed to be "natural" I guess, but I'm with you, I don't particularly like kids, why would I have one on perpose?\n\nI'm told some people feel they have no meaning in their life if they don't have kids, they think they need to continue the legacy, pass on the family name/genes... personaly I think its mostly hormones messing with them.
136296
She has a child with the guy from Jodeci.I don't know if she has had any others.
112615
I don't think there are any.
575186
not exactly something you'd show the kids.
232768
Maybe they ate unicorns and heffalumps and murmaids and that's why there aren't any now. :o)\n\nIn my opinion, the whole story is a parable, so it's pointless to ask about such details.
496272
I know of a family that had 4 kids......they were first cousins, and they ended up having 4 kids with learning disabilities....and downs syndrome......\n\nSo I would say no...do not have kids unless you are prepared to have kids with many challenges.....
551090
No, she does not have any children.  She is just a thick girl.
277876
It could be Mary - you never specify in the problem that she only has 4 kids.  She could have two dozen :)
72307
I don't have any kids.
254905
I don't believe there are any.