can you prove it..............how?
129060
I don't agree with that Zywei234(whatever) guy. He said other creatures worship god, but we humans have brains and we think......what other creatures besides humans worship god? And yes we could have flat hands but they're round... thats called evolution. Humans evolved to what they are today.\n\n Black people are darker because generations of Africans were exposed to the sun...The sun has UV rays which cause skin cancer....the more melanin in the skin the more protected you are from UV Rays.....more melanin=darker skin.\n\n White people,Asians,.....other races that were not in the climate conditions that Africans were exposed too(extreme uv rays) were in colder climates(seasons). Therefore they have longer hair to keep them warmer.\n\n  You can look up more evidence, but I know science can give you in your face answers with proof. Religion is vast. If God existed why would It allow all these different religions to exist? If God was really...God then why would it allow bad things to happen? \n\n   People kill people. People fear death. People created a happy place to ease their fears(heaven). People created a God to give reason to life.
433648
Can't prove it as n cannot = + or -1 and k be an interger.\nIt appears to work with other odd integers. Change your question then it may be possible to prove it.
433835
"If one can be proven then why not the other?" Well, because you're trying to prove two different things. One being proven does not serve as automatic proof for the other--you need solid evidence for both. And it's possible that evidence could be much harder to find for one thing than the other.\n\nAs for "if it could be proven then, why not now"... There are much higher expectations these days for what counts as decisive evidence. And I don't remember it being proven in the past. Do you have a source for that statement?
265332
I would think pictures could be pretty good proof.  Did they show you doing something?
449904
I do not know. That's the truth. I do not know. But that doesn't actually prove anything, does it?
170363
They say so but no concrete proof..
53646
Youre right, you cant prove it. But thats fine for most people, cause if you keep telling yourself thats something exist, its gonna exist. So you dont need a proof. If you keep telling yourself that theres God, God will exist. If you dont, then he wont. It simple. And about the Bible, I could write a book right now about a new God, bury it in the earth and then about 1000 years later someone's gonna find it, and there will be a new religion, and everybody will believe in my God. You know what im saying? So you cant prove anything, its just whether believe in it or not. If you do you'll see it.
440584
No one can prove it - zero, one, or many.  Gods, for some reason, choose to leave no evidence of their existence.\n\nFunny, isn't it.\n\nA
439423
What is to be proved? It's not clear.
329509
ther are some things in life that you can not prove.\n\nwhat kind of stuff do thay say to you, and what do thay do to you.
546170
I had a professor who was always very adamant that you could not prove the hypothesis. Something about you don't actually test the hypothesis, you test the question....or somehting. He was very odd. I think there's a difference between a hypothesis and fact.
532593
there is nothing to prove n >1 so there you go!
224949
Better question--how can we prove that that it is fixed? We don't want this to keep happening year after year....
178332
Yes, but try to get some proof first.
44895
No.  Deductive proofs start from a "given", that is, a fact accepted as true or a theorem previously proven to be true.  But other kinds of proofs start with an assumption that the theorem to be proved is not true, and from that assumption derive some contradiction, thus proving that the theorem itself is true.\n\nAn example would be the proof that there is no highest prime number, which goes like this. Assume that there is a highest prime number.  Call it x.  Now consider the number x! + 1.  (X! is X times X-1 times X-2 all the way down to 1.)  Since x! is divisible by 2, x! + 1, being just 1 more than x!, is not divisible by 2.  Similarly, x! + 1 is not divisible by 3, 4, or any other integer up to and including x.  Since x! + 1 is not divisible by any number up to x, either it is prime, or it's prime factors are larger than x.  But that contradicts our assumption that x is the largest prime.  Thus, our assumption is false.  QED.
212483
No one has proof. That's why it's called faith.\n\nThe real question is why do you need to beleive?
71587
Umm....  there is no way to disprove it....thats why its called a law, not a theorem.  Also, you need to be more specific.  What ways?  Whats experiments?  \n\nAsk again with  more details and I will help you