price paid after the discount is subtracted?\nthe cost of overhead minus the selling price?
119424
owning stock would be my guess
416503
markup on cost, you paid $1 sell for $2 your markup is 100%\n\nmarkup on price, same input, your markup is 50%
302913
If the contract only had a total with one price, then the seller would be obligated to honor the price.  Since the contract has individual prices that are added up to the total, then the contract would be considered void in a court of law as it has a calculation error, unless the total says that it has been discounted to be lower than the sum of the individual components.
637676
You do not charge tax for on line sales.  Your discount is calculated on the original price.  Any product purchased out of state and shipped outof state is not subject to state taxes.  If it was taxed you would have to no the tax rate for each state and charge sales tax for your state, their state and then file your sales tax quarterly for each that that you sold an item to.  This would put e commerce sites out of business.
545375
Use a header row to name column A as Wholesale Price; column B as Markup; column C as Retail Price; Column D as Discount and Column E as Sale Price.\nFormat the cells in columns A, C, and E as Currency. Format the cells in columns B and D as percentage.\nThe formula in column C is =(A*B)+A\nThe formula in column E is =C-(C*D)\nInsert your values into A, B and D\n\nNote to OP\nIt does work, it's just counter-intuitive.  Using your numbers - the 10% markup gives you a retail price of $110. 10% of 110 is 11, so the sale price is below the wholesale. You can never have a discount with the same percent as the markup and not lose money because you are taking a percentage of a greater number.\nThat's why furniture stores have a 100% markup and give a 50% discount to break even.\n\nHowever if you want the formula for what you did:\nThe formula in column C is =A/(1.00-B)\nThe formula in column E is =C*(1.00-D)\nBut the percentages in columns B and D must be less than 99%
642888
Take the original/wholesale price, and divide it by .35\nThis will equal your selling price. (with 65% markup)
118729
Formula: original cost x ( 1 + Profit% ) = sell price\n\nIn this case:\nC x (1+25%) = 39000\nC x 1.25 = 39000\nC = 31200\n\nTo check use:\n(Sell price - original cost)/original cost should equal to profit %\n\nTherefore, \n(39000-31200)/31200 = 0.25 = 25%  (this proves that C = 31200 is correct)
576065
1) move each decimal point two times to the left (ex: 45%=0.45)\n2) multiple sales tax and dollar amount and thats your answer\n3) same as above\n4) same as above (ex: something cost $50 sale 20%off... $50 times 0.20 = you save $10)\n5) same as above\n6)same as above then subtract amount from original (ex: something cost $50 sale 20%off... $50 times 0.20 = you save $10 then you take orginal amount -save =answer $50-$10=$40)\n7) take rule number 6 then rule numer 2 add them together and thats your answer...\n\nnow take those rules and do your own homework! good luck!
664
The $2 should be subtracted from the $27, not added to it -- since they were overcharged by $5, the room actually cost $25.\n\nThey ending up paying $27, $25 for the room and $2 to the bellhop. That $27 plus the $3 refund is the original $30
20594
There is no mathematical formula.  It is what it is.  If you get 2% of all sales, then you get 2% of all sales.  Usually profit sharing only 1 or 2%.  Thats it.
57031
Basically: There is an initial $30 charge.  It should have been $25, so $5 must be returned and accounted for.  $3 is given to the 3 friends, $2 is kept by the manager - there you have the $5.  \n\nThe trick to this riddle is that the addition and subtraction are done at the wrong times to misdirect your thinking - and quite successfully for most.  Each of the 3 friends did indeed pay $9, not $10, and as far as the friends are concerned, they paid $27 for the night.  But we know that the clerk will tell us that they were charged only $25 and when you add the $3 returned with the $2 kept by the bellhop, you come up with $30.
394963
That depends on  what your store's codes are. Most businesses have their own procedure with free items. Most of the time it's subtotal, then the code for the free item and total.
77104
This is an invoice.\n\n2/10= 2% discount if paid within 10 days\n\nn/30= if discount is not taken, payment is due within 30 days.\n\nFOB Shipping point=the merchandise is yours when it ships, not when it actually arrives at your warehouse. Therefore, your inventory account increases while your cash decreases.
57464
Divide the difference between the two prices by the original price (59.53 divided by 398.53) and then multiply that answer by 100.  In this case, the discount is a little under 15%.
652429
you can charge what you want for shipping. There is a shipping calc that estimates what it costs , if they want next day delv you can change the shipping cost to reflect the diff... if it doesnt get there that is Ups or fed ex fault as long as the tracking # shows you sent it next day
635834
I haven't done this in forever, but I'll try.  If I get something egregiously wrong, let me know via email.\n\nIn the interests of laziness, I used M instead of MM for million.\n\nIn time 0, there's\n-15M\n-150k\nSum = -15.15M\n\nIn year 1,\nthere's\n-1M from fixed costs\n-5.65M from change in NWC (58M in sales -> 5.8M total)\n+8M from (sales - VC)\n-2.8M in tax\n+1.5M from deprecation tax shield\nSum = .05M\n\nIn year 2,\n-1M in fixed costs\n-2.9M from change in NWC (87M in sales)\n+12M from (sales - VC)\n-4.4M in tax\n+1.5 from depr\nSum = 5.2M\n\nIn year 3,\n-1M in fixed\n+4.35M (43.5M in sales)\n+6M from (sales - VC)\n-2M in tax\n+1.5 from depr\nSum = 8.85M\n\nAt the end (still year 3),\nthere's\n+4.35M from recovered NWC\n+3.75M in salvage value (might be less if the book value is less than 3.75...I don't exactly remember how to handle this, but it might be 60% depending on if the sale is taxed from whatever cost basis)\nSum = 8.1M\n\nSo, -15.15M + (.05M/1.2) + (5.2M/1.2^2) + (8.85/1.2^3) + (8.1M/1.2^3) = -1.69M\n\nThe IRR is relatively trivial from here.\n\nHm, so it's looking negative.  I'm not sure.  There's definitely something off in my calculations somewhere.  *shrug*
350110
2 %\n\nLet x be the Wholsale Proce and y be the sale proce\n\nInitial 20 % mark-up  means x + 0.2x = 1.2x\n y is 15% less than 1.2x\n\ny = 1.2x - (0.15(1.2x))\ny = 1.2x - 0.18x\ny = 1.02x\n\nHence the Sale price is 2 % higher than the wholesale Price (may be the "documentation charges" - jst kid'ng)