I think it should be held at the Los Angeles Coliseum in Los Angeles, CA (Home of the first Super Bowl, Ford Field in Detroit, Michigan (Home of Super Bowl XL) or at Soldier Field in Chicago, Illinois.
131602
DENVER!!!!\n\nAll you wimps who can't stand cold football games can just stay home and let us REAL football fans have a chance to buy SB tickets.\n\nSBs are all about the money....not the game.\n\nI dream for the day that a 10.0 earthquake hits CA and it falls into the sea.  Good riddance LA, SD, SF, OAK and pebble beach.\n\nAND ALL YOU FROM CA, QUIT MOVING TO MY STATE!!!!!
97398
It only depends on which big plays were made and kept for history..., also the logo of the Superbowl held, and maybe the magnificence of the stadium were it's played.  I bet everybody would remember the city if any Superbowl were played in Green Bay.  \nAlso that's the problem about Superbowls played in domes.  I don't wanna die without visiting the Packers Stadium.  I think outdoor fields held the spirit of college football, and that's something we're lacking of in the NFL these days.  That's why it is getting homogenized year after year.  Am I wrong?
663699
C) Los Angeles Dodgers\n\nJust went to a game on the 24th and will be going again on the 4th of July. Let's go Dodgers!!!
641547
it was the year the vikings lots to the raiders in the superbowl.  i would say 1977
106607
This past year would have been an exception for me. I would have loved to see the Texas-USC game much more than the Seattle-Pittsburgh game. The Rose Bowl was much more exciting than the Super Bowl. I think that was a pretty boring Super Bowl. In any other year, I would have wanted to see the Super Bowl more than the College Football National Championship.
427148
There are already too many bottom feeders (I know I'm from Detroit!!) to expand to more cities although a couple more to make each conference have the same amount of teams would be the best situation.\n\nWith Canada having the CFL and Toronto already having a good football team, it is HIGHLY unlikely that there would be an expansion to compete with the CFL. (An interesting alternative to that would be to combine the CFL and the NFL... Hmmm would it work??)
397865
Detroit, MI or Beijing, China are my guesses.
305922
It has to do with weather, stadium capacity, motels in and around the city, and how much the city and team are willing to put forward to have the superbowl there.
200409
I'd Like to say the Home Depot Center but it's way to small to hold a World Cup match. The obvious choices are:\n\nThe Rose bowl in Pasadena, CA- Where '94 world cup final was held.\nRFK in Washington DC\nFoxboro in New England area- Many National team games held here.\nGillette stadium- might be the one I'm thinking of in Foxboro but I'm 100% sure.\nThe Coliseum in Los Angeles, CA- Mexico plays a lot of their friendlies there.\n\nThere are probably a bunch I'm missing most of the ones I'm missing are most likely to be football stadiums turned into soccer stadiums just for the world cup. \n\nCities that are most likely to hold a game would be L.A., DC, Foxboro, Columbus(possibility), Miami, Texas, Chicago, San Francisco, Seattle, Maybe Atlanta and Kansas city.
61102
It would be great! \nRugby WC 1999 was well organized there. I think you deserve it as Germany 2006 was almost South Africa 2006.\n\nPablo, from Argentina.\n\nPS: Westwood, the subject says clearly "Football (Soccer)", surely you are from US as for the "rest of the world" there is only 1 World Cup.
487889
It's pretty mediocre, even with the more recent renovations.  Not a bad stadium, just not real flashy.\n\nHowever, if Al davis croaks, you can bet that Oakland would still be an excellent spot for a Super Bowl.  Hell, they had one in Palo Alto.\n\nGood for logistics, hotels, weather (mostly).  Why not.
130665
I would have to agree with you in a way. NY sports should be in NY, although, where would you propose this stadium go? I do think that NY sports should start leveraging available land and subway lines in Queens and Brooklyn.
184647
It will be taking place in the Stade de France, at St Denis, Paris, which played host to the 1998 World Cup Finals.
1518
Los Angeles 38, Washington 9\nTampa Stadium\nTampa, Florida\nJanuary 22, 1984\nAttendance: 72,920\nMVP: Marcus Allen, RB, Los Angeles
197420
pittsburgh should relocate to winnepeg.  their fans are great there.  they have more people who would watch the games .  that would put detroit  in the eastern conference where they belong.  the face of the west would change dramatically if it happened.
167160
2011 – Indianapolis - maybe it will happen with new stadium, but it shouldn't, indy is too small and too cold\n\n2012 – Atlanta - not unlikely, but again, it shouldn't.  atlanta can be cold in january/february, and it is a fairly small market\n\n2013 – Los Angeles - ok, but i assume you mean pasadena, and the rose bowl would need renovation.  as it stands now, no chance for the colloseum, unless la gets a team and renovates it or builds a new stadium.\n\n2014 – Chicago - no chance.  i live in chicago, and i think it's the greatest city in the u.s., and new york is it's only real competition.  but there's no way this will happen, it's too cold, too outdoors, and too small.  after indy builds a new stadium, soldier field will be the smallest in the country, and there's no new stadium coming anytime soon after spending half a billion or so on renovations to soldier field 2 years ago.   \n\n2016 – Detroit - i hope not, too soon, and a bad idea anyway.\n\nas for 2015, kc is probably out, the rolling roof was voted down last week, and the superbowl will not come to an outdoor arrowhead.  also, i am originally from the kc area and a chiefs fan, and i think hosting a superbowl there would be a disaster; there is not enough hotels, there is not enough to do, and the weather in february sucks.    \n\nto paraprase espn.com's bill simmons, the superbowl should just rotate between san diego, new orleans, and miami.  these are the only warm weather cities in the country with the hotel space, the stadium and convention facilities, and also the fun factor stemming from centralized downtowns and no shortage of bars.  the superbowl is the biggest u.s. sporting event of the year, except for the occasional hosting of a summer olympics.  it is also a week-long party.  thus, it should be played only in places that people want to go, and unfortunately since it is a winter event, this excludes cold climates.  should the chiefs ever make the superbowl, i fully intend to attend by any menas necesary, selling my car, maxing out credit cards, whatever.  and in such a case, i would hate to do so to spend a week in houston, jacksonville, or detroit.
379736
I would have to say Detroit.