Sometimes it's claimed he was one, but I don't believe it. What do you think?
128096
He was a theoretical physicist
204977
No -one knows what his demonsration was, that was the whole point.\nBut it has been proved subsequentally. See the second link
568588
We are saying that the story of Jesus was probably embellished alot down the line. Perhaps he did not claim to be the son of god, maybe he was just a prophet or political activist who gained people's admiration - and ended up being persecuted by the politicians of the time for spreading his political message.
561880
i don't think he has 1
181255
It's purely rumor, but it wouldn't surprise me.  He was a crazy guy like that.  Most geniuses are.
44395
He is a man who believes something very strongly. Whether or not what he believes is wrong is not up to us. How he goes about enforcing his beliefs is something he will take up with his maker.
123585
I have a good one, because I've actually believed it, and still do.  According to this theory, the UNAbomber wasn't alone.  First of all, UNAbomber stands for University and Airport bomber, but they chose a sound similar to "uni", which everyone knows means one.  Secondly, they actually took away his cabin on a truck, and wouldn't let local authorities take a peak.  They claimed there were tons of evidence, even though it couldn't all have fit inside the cabin.  Finally, they didn't give the UNAbomber the right to a fair trial.  They didn't let him pick his attorney, and they read all his mail.  They also portrayed him as crazy, but that was most likely drugs.\nAnyway, I believe they made him a scapegoat to scare everybody from attempting a revolution, even though it is our constitutional right.  They should never have denied him his rights, whether he was right or wrong, because he's a US citizen, which has less to do with any recent administration than it does with the all-around history of the country and the constitution.
92376
I dont believe he is a Christian, I dont believe anyone following Christ would ever run for office. Not to mention he lies, and is a member of the Freemasons and Skull and Bones which he never denies. Just because someone SAYS they're a Christian in no way means they are.
23432
He looks like one, so why not?
605127
sounds like a good idea.  I mean, there's no proof He does or doesn't exist so we may as well just keep an open mind on both possibilities and talk about something else.
541024
He was a fictional one. So don't sweat the details.
461664
I quite agree that it is possible.  I'm not saying it did not happen here.  I just haven't seen the evidence yet to convince me at this point.
495233
the one who claims to be the only "true"one .
466378
You mean his search for the truth has flaws??  It's really hard to believe that idiot could lie to all his followers.  He could have been a preacher, has all the qualifications, I think there's a church in Boulder that's right down his alley.
482143
i personally think that he would be considered a false prophet, because he was kind of loopy and thought he really had these encounters, when there is no proof that he really did. for all we know, he could have been making these things up to get attention. i dont mean to give you such a bad answer, but i cant articulate my ideas properly at the moment.
217212
False!  He was not the first president of the United States.  There was someone else, although I'm not sure of his name.  The inaguration I beleive was either in Philadelphia or New York.
458215
I think (though I'm an atheist and therefore possibly more rational than some here) that one can't - a priori - prove that he's NOT, therefore he COULD BE.