In the State of Minn. if a search warrent is dated March 27 but the complaint form says the search was executed on the 26th, does that hold up in court.
132446
When was the warrant issued?  If it wasn't issued till the 27th then of course it was an illegal search on the 26th.  If it was signed off by a judge but not entered into the system till the 27th then it would be a legal search.  If it was signed off on the 26th or before but the date is entered incorrectly into the system then that won't cause a problem as long as it was correct when the judge signed it.  If it was issued in a manner which specficed that it could only be done on the 27th (not common, but can occur) then the search on the 26th was illegal.  Without a bit more information to know what each date truly is that's the best I can provide.  Also what date was the search actually executed? If it's marked as the 26th but it was truly the 27th then they have to amend the complaint form, but once that's done there's no problem.
341884
Get a good lawyer. I had a lawyer fax in my court date cancelation 2 days before court and since the court office clerks are idiots the fax was time stamped 2 days before court. But at the court heiring they found me GIA since the cop thought this he never showed for the rescheduled court case and I won back my 300+ fine.
208615
A warrant expires only if it is allowed to. If a warrant is close to it's expiration, then the judge usually renews it. There is no statute for limitations on warrants. There are statutes for limitations on some crimes (not all) and the limitations are for the period of time between when the crime is committed and when the person is charged.\n\nOnce a person is charged with a crime, the statue of limitations does not apply.
171588
Depends on when the judge makes the decision.Followup with your lawyer.
35383
Your question is especially valid in light of the fact that a warrant can be obtained up to three days after the fact.  Also, very few out of the thousands requested have ever been denied.  "Being able to respond quickly" is therefore not a valid excuse for faliure to get a legal warrant.  The question now becomes: "Who is hiding what?".
130559
It is possible and common to get a continuance without the consent of the other side.  What should not be possible, however, is for the attorney for one side to go into court to ask for such a continuance without first giving notice to the other side that he intends to do so, and when he will do so.  If the date is no good for you, you should tell the court that the request was made without notice to you, and request a new hearing to reschedule.
24619
Actually, death warrants contain a date which the warrant expires.  12:01 is a common time to schedule an execution, but not universal.\n\nThe idea that the execution is done at 12:01am to avoid a last minute reprieve is ridiculous - by the time the date of execution arrives the case has gone through years of appeals, petitions for post-conviction relief, and appeals for clemency and probably an application for a stay to the U.S.Supreme Court.  If there is going to be a stay granted - everyone from the state's Governor to the US Supreme Court is aware of the date and time of execution.  \n\nIt is true that early morning executions are preferred by wardens to keep protests to a minumum - but more preferred to keep the other prisoners in control - the prison is going to be quieter at 12:01am than when hundreds of inmates are likely to be agitated.
122089
I'm pretty sure that it's a Federal Law that a person has to be released after 24 hours. It's not unheard of for the police to say " you were free to leave at any time" as an excuse for holding a person longer.
464027
you post is not clear, but if they have a warrant, and the warrant is valid and signed by the judge they can search for anything named on the warrant
521732
The Supreme Court has ruled that in minors have fewer rights than adults do in certain cases, especially in schools. They had the right to search him on probable cause, but only then. If they did not have probable cause then it was illegal. In any case, this could be the grounds for a lawsuit to fight the age discrimination that students suffer in schools.
437540
Actually, the police are required to make a reasonable effort to serve the warrant at the address recorded on the warrant and within the amount of time prescribed by law (often one year).  This effort may consist of nothing more than knocking on the door receiving no answer, and leaving.  This process is called "due diligence" and is required to keept the warrant active and valid.\n\nOnce due diligence has been performed, and unless the wanted person has warrants for crimes of violence, presents a threat to the community, etc., it is unlikely that any additional efforts will be made to serve the warrant.  Where I work, we all know that the people who don't take car e of their cases and end up with warrants will eventually turn up and get arrested.
444546
I know an excellent lawyer his name is Tim Warren he is out of St Joseph missouri. yes you may have a case with some more of the details. These are not simple cases, you should have went to the manager in the first place that is a big thing they will use against you. So, talk with an atty who can get all the details. Dates are very important and if you still have the e-mails print them out and save them all from you and from him. Good luck
531201
allegedly it proves the date you came up with an idea - that is if the letter is in there - and the postal service gives a clean date mark - front and back to seal the letter -\n\ndo not know if it will hold up in court\n\nand do not open the letter
500130
Not legal, I had this happen, passed their breath test and they held me 4 hours til I submitted to a blood test.  Also, no lawyer or phone call.  Not only did I win my case, but sued for false imprisonment and settled for 500 grand plus lawyers fees.
69424
It depends on the offense.  If the defendant only violated the protective order, then the days sound like it is in the range for sentencing.  If the defendant committed another offense and he/she would be subject to the penalties of the new offense.  The sentence is based on the underlying charge.\n\nThe conviction will limit the defendant in many ways including losing the right to own firearms and other weapons.
214819
If you were acquitted, there will be no record so it will not affect your job search. You need not even list it on an application. That being said, I have seen many potential employees with similar questions and found over the years that "thrown out of court" can mean numerous other outcomes besides acquittal. If you received a STET docket or PBJ, those are different than innocence. The charges exist and essentially the state and yourself agree that the state has enough evidence to convict you but the elect to not try the case. If this was the real outcome it could certainly have a negative impact on your job search unless it was expunged.
503551
Boy.  There are a lot of people answering this question who really don't know the rules in this country.  I speak from 11 years of law enforcement experience, many of those specifically developing traffic offenses into greater crimes.  So people don't think I am feeding you a line of police BS, I included the laws that established each of the rights and reasons to search.  Feel free to research them yourself so you can see I am giving you the straight scoop.\n\nThere are many times when the police can search your entire car, including your trunk, glove box, and even locked containers within your car, without a warrant.  I'll lay out four of the most common techniques I use to search cars.\n\n(1) Consent.  Can't go wrong here.  If you ask for consent to search and the driver (or person in charge of the vehicle) gives you consent, you can search the entire vehicle.  The consenting party has the authority to withdraw their consent and/or limit the areas you can search.\n\nOn reasons (2) through (4) consent makes no difference.  If the police can meet one of these requirements, they will legally search your car with or without your consent.\n\n(2) Probable Cause.  If you develop probable cause during a traffic stop, you may search the vehicle without a warrant.  This is commonly called the "motor vehicle exception" to the search warrant rule.  The authority for the police to do so was first established under a US supreme court case called Carroll v. United States.  The courts have since expanded on this case and allowed the police to search items within the vehicle regardless of who claims ownership of the items.  Under this technique, the police can only search areas where it is reasonable to believe the contraband they are searching for may be found.  For example, if the police believe they are lookng for a rifle, they would not be able to search a purse.  However, if they find the rifle and now believe they might be looking ammunition, the search of the purse is good.\n\n(3) Pursuant to arrest.  If the police arrest you for a bookable offense while operating a motor vehicle, they may search the areas under your control (including the passenger compartment and possibly other areas of the car) for contraband or weapons that you may have discarded.  This authority is established under case law named Chimel v. California.\n\n(4) Inventory search - If the police have the authority to tow your car, they may search it under the premise that they need to inventory all items contained within the car prior to towing the car.  These searches were upheld under the community caretaking doctrine established under South Dakota v. Opperman.\n\nThere are other ways to get into a car.  Too many to go into here.  Truthfully, there is almost NEVER a time when the police need a warrant to search a car.  In my 11 years, I think I have obtained a warrant for two or three of the probably 1000 cars I have searched, and those cars were firmly secured in the police impound lot pending the warrant.\n\nHope this settles your dispute.