They both may work at the same job and did the same amunt of work and recieved the same pay.
122296
The rationale is that the raising of children is good for society - so must be supported by all, whether or not you have children.  That is the reason too why the tax system pays for schools, not just the parents.  Other people's children will be supporting you in your elderly years, right?
615726
They're the same thing. One might be "privately" run and the other partially "taxpayers money" run.
526521
yea they would still be working together but it would be a different diddy...i don't think it would be the same diddy we see today...
108238
To me they are pretty much the same.
37303
They work for the state. All state workers are paid well.
292319
are you sure it was teh same person?
623201
they both work with "pies" ?
604702
If all else is equal, then yes. I have heard people complain about this, only to find that the more attractive person happened to also be more qualified or not a parent or nowhere near retirement age or a nonsmoker or some other thing that makes you a more useful employee.\n\nNow, if the "less attractive" person was more qualified, and was willing to do the job for the same pay, then it is indeed wrong.\n\nYes it could be considered discriminatory if it can be proven, but usually there would be a specific reason that could be cited for one person getting a job over another person.
43938
both lives are equally precious.
669705
if he is now paying them correctly , then there is no problem, else he ll get in the hands of the IT dept...
43038
They are both linked below.
551679
no thats a good idea in my opinion becuase if this other person doesnt fulfill his duty in the job they may look for a replacement and if you met their standards for the job in the first place, they might call you back
393921
THEY HAVE EQUIVALENT CHANCE FOR PROMOTIONS.
293253
The jobs you describe are mostly min wage jobs so nothing will change. Far as letting go of workers to hire other for less. I would think a company could not afford the law suits that would result from that
63003
If you know where they worked previously, they may have information of where they work now.  Otherwise, try a google search.  They may be listed in their employer's online directory.
214664
both were working for me!!!
500347
THEY DON'T PAY THEM AS MUCH. AND THEY WORK HARD FOR THE LITTLE THAT THEY DO GET.