After 30 years I want to know the truth even if it is bad. Please tell me!!!
132349
All three of these answers above me are correct.  Your biological mother would have to be BO and your biological father would be AO and the O allele in each would be recessive, or not showing its trait because of the dominant a/b allele.  A Punnett Square would look something like this:  \nMOM    \n       ||||||||||  B |||  O  |\n       ------------\nD||     A| AB |  AO |\nA||     -------------\nD||     O| BO |  OO | <- That's you with type O blood.  If you had three siblings it would be likely that one would have AB blood, one type A blood, and one type B blood. \n       ------------
262726
horrible beyond words...thankfully its all in the past\n\ni disagree with rpshaw...there are things that do happen that u know are right and wrong
71022
As far as I know there is not a copy that you can find. I have looked and there is not much on it. After all, this is not something that some people want us to know about. There are some good books that talk about it, but I do not know of any that have the report in it. I don't think that many people want to know, after all, it shakes their comfort to think that they might not be as "free" as they think.
325679
If anyone can handle the truth, you will have alot of your questions answered from this video, please visit http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=loose+change
258368
You are on the right track, read both books objectively and sincerely, I believe you will no doubt arrive at the truth. Kindly let me know the results of your findings at the end of your research, best of luck with your download hunt. Kind regards.
394582
Um, as the democraps and repukelicans are mirror images, then your answer is neither.  The truth will come out, in 40 years through declassified USG documents...just like Operation Northwoods, MKULTRA, Condor, Project Mockingbird, so on and so on.  If you have not figured out that politics is just a link in the chain of distraction the USG uses to shackle the majority working class and poor, then you, my friend, prefer to be part of the problem.  Research the Strategy of Confusion, and the complacency and compliance of the political parties, then come back here and rethink your position.\n\nThe truth will only come out after the players hace been long dead and gone...cuz we can't prosecute a corpse...wink wink
672401
yep\n\nwouldn't it be nice to get the truth?  Check this out and read the FIRST one.\nhttp://www.foodfacts.com.au/FoodMythology.aspx
618988
wish I had an answer for you dearheart...all I can suggest is research the past...there has to be a record somewhere of it all...
563050
I was willing to give this a reasonable chance until I read this:\n\nOne early morning in '99 Range was returing from Henderson when a low-flying craft dropped a trail right overhead along Boulder Highway. "It covered my car with a sticky web-like coating and I saved a specimen in a jar. Microscopic fiber-like filaments," Range reports\n\nWhat was the outcome of the analysis of this specimen?  If this happened in 1999 don't you think she would've taken it in for analysis by now?  \n\nAnd what does being over 25 have to do with anything?  Are all people over 25 blind or something?\n\nI live in NJ so I can't say that its completely untrue but, I find it hard to believe that so few people have come forward.  A lot of people live in Vegas, I would've expected more people to have said somethin by now and I would expect this to be national news if it were true.  People aren't as complacent as you think they are, when it has to do with their long term health and the health of their children, people are usually very vigilant.
85356
You don't. The people who brought you into this world and cared for you for such a long time should deserve to know the truth.
152117
In the 60's? Early 70's? That's ballpark. You had to go and get me curious, so I searched...couldn't find alot of info about it, but I know if I kept on it, I would - happy surfing!
676590
Quite correct. Too, don't let it affect you to the point of inflammatory speech. Everybody knows, nobody cares. How do you navigate in such waters. \n\nIf you can see these things, you have an idea what truth is. First off, man is flawed. Not to be fully trusted even at his best. \n\nMadison Avenue makes a living presenting a doctored view of the truth. Peace within yourself is the objective and not to fall prey to what others do making you like themselves.\n\nCynicism isn't in view here. A sober outlook on things based on the facts is what's in order. \n\nI wish you success in the endeavor.
522062
If you were pardoned, I don't think there will be a problem....especially if it happened 30 years ago and you haven't had any trouble since. Although, I guess it would depend on what you were charged with. My advice would be to get ahold of cusoms and ask them directly.
348
I think it's over 40 years this has been happening. Why doesn't it change? It's not a simple answer. There are lots of websites talking about the reasons why. And one reason right now is I feel because of Bush.
40059
I don't have questions! You need to understand how difficult it is to prosecuted Child Abuse / Molestation Cases. All too often the Petifiles walk, so, if your new   man was charged and convicted, he propably did it! Why don't you research the history on the case? You cannot trust his word, you need to read for yourself the documented case from Police, CPS, Councilors, etc; I hope you wise up & take action before exposing your child(ren) to a monster!
542432
My take is that you cannot take anything reported on TV as fact.\n\nTo learn the real truth regarding anything you have to search it out.  You are more likely to find the truth on the internet than the news media.
618470
If you have to go back a millennium to find fault with the church, I think that pretty much proves the Catholic Church has learned from it's, alleged, mistakes.\n\nLet me see if I get this straight:\n1) You think the Catholic Church is bad.\n2) Therefore, you want it brought up on trial for all the mistakes, both real and imaged, of the past.\n3) And your only "evidence" is a scientifically unsubstantiated belief that electricity could have brought about all the inventions we have today?\n\nYou can't prove that. A mere "belief" does not consititute evidence. What's more, you stll will have to prove how having the electronics of today would have prevented the mistakes, both real and imagined, of the past.\n\nI don't think you've thought this through very well, if at all.