My choices are Olympus CX 31 or CX 41, Nikon 50 i, E200 or E200F. Choose the optimum one for vets. I am from the Philippines (a humid country).
119886
can I contact you directly? The CX31 will be good for you. UP VetMed has olympus microscopes....Please call 727-1058 (Manila number) and look for Frances, (Olympus dealer). We can give you a demo and help you choose... We can also give you a call...
37572
I think a 270 would be a nice choice because it is light and flat shooting.  I use a 7mm mag but I hunt elk at the same time.  7mm can take down anything and shoots well.  I would guess to pay 500 or so if you want a scope with it.  I sucked it up when I was 19 and spent $1000 on a  weatherby/leupold combo and have never regretted the expense.  That was 8 deer and 17 elk ago.\n\nGreg in Idaho
617585
I think an 8" dob is an excellent choice. I haven't seen this particular model, but from what I've heard I think it's a good one. Orion Telescope and Binoculars (www.telescope.com) is another good source for this type of scope. The Yahoo telescopes group, and the Cloudy Nights forums are a couple of good places to go for more information and opinions.\n\nI think these scopes usually come with a 25mm eyepiece. A 10 or 12mm eyepiece would be a good next eyepiece. Or buy a 2x Barlow lens; that will double the power of any eyepiece. Eventually, you might also want to get a wide-angle eyepiece around 30mm in 2" size. These are great for panoramic views of the Milky way, and also handy for finding things.\n\nHere's wishing you clear skies!
563986
see what it takes for Veterinary Science, you know the beginning stuff like pre-med.  Maybe that'd help.  Or contact your local County Extension  Agent and he can pull out all kinds of brochures on subjects related to the one your looking for.  Good Luck Animal Lover
71875
Usually Enterprise.  You can get a compact for about 18 bucks a day.
631262
$100 is very little. So I would say a Spyder Victor II, Sonix, or Tl-X. Don't get a Brass Eagle or PMi Prianha. Spyders are easy for begineers and are easy to upgrade. A Tippman shoots slow, and you need to upgrade a lot.
452900
I have used the Aimpoint and the EOTech.  Most people like the EOTech better because it easier to acquire with both eyes open.  With that said, I always liked the Aimpoint better because it sat higher so it was easier for me to acquire quickly.  I like my current setup the best though.  It is an ACOG with a J Point mounted on top.  The J Point(10 MOA dot) is very easy to acquire plus I have the long range option available.  The one drawback to a J Point is that it is more difficult to zero than other sights.
18991
Anything Epson.. whatever you can afford.  They're the best.  We just upgraded to Epson Stylus Photo 2200.  It's SWEET!  But our other one was Epson Stylus CX3200 and that one was nice too.  We only upgraded cause we print off ALL of our photos and wanted to print 11*14.
644444
I'm gonna go with C.  if only because, as a young lad, I noticed that the image is clearest when your eye is the same distance from the lens as the object you are viewing.\n\nthen I discovered if you take it out in the sun, you can burn a hole in a piece of paper.  boys may be dumb, but we sure do have fun at things!  LOL
322233
digital camera-computer-printer!!\nwhen U buy your camera,you get a disc with easily to follow promting,an that's you ,loaded for bear,\nor jeep, whatever U like to photograph!
335981
the new Sony. i dont know the model and i dunno if it is only in south africa but its a neat little thing... if u cant find it y not wait 4 the mp4 2 come out, then get it imported from dubai, it is so cheap! thats wat im doin! the JVC mp3 is also pretty cheap and reliable. hope this helps
214379
they give you glasses to wear for boot camp so you dont have to worry about having a lense pop out or get dirt in it.  Trust me you will spend a good amount of time in dirt, or sand.  You dont want you glasses or contacts going through that.  Use their glasses, they are free and you dont need to worry about them breaking.  Once a year the corps will give you a free pair of "civilian" glasses, they are actually a nice pair of glasses, but you dont want them in the field.
380584
I suggest you go for Zyoptix-100.It is far more advanced, accurate & safe as compared to Lasik.\n\nYou may be a good candidate if you: \n  \no Feel that spectacles/contact lenses are a nuisance in your job, sporting activities or personal life\no Suffer from the effect of scattered light (aberrations)\no Have been told that your pupils are too big, or your corneas too thin, for standard treatment\no Have healthy eyes, good general health and are not taking medication that affects the healing process\no Are older than 18 \n\nI had Zyoptix last year & got a 6/6 vision from a case of extreme Myopia! (I mean it when I say Extreme). My vision is better than my corrected vision before surgery. \n\nHowever if you have a mild case of Myopia then exercises & good diet can help you get 6/6 vision sans surgery, \n\nP.S In case you plan a vacation to Thailand or India in near future then thats the place to get this surgery done. Its very cheap & they use complete state of art faclities. It will cost you Appx $800 for the complete surgery & tests in India & $2000 in Thailand. \n\nI say Go for it!
495748
I would recommend a Meade ETX-90.  That's about the lowest price scope you can buy with good optics.  Don't waste your money on a $49.95 cheap 60mm scope - a good pair of binoculars are much better, you don't have to set anything up, and they go with you in your car's glove compartment.\n\nThe Meade ETX-90 is a Matsukov Cassegrain ("Mak-Cass") telescope.  It comes with Autostar (computer guided "GOTO" feature that lets you view 1000s of celestial objects with the push of a button).  It also comes with a very sturdy tripod, motor drives, and push-button focus.\n\nRetail price about $750.00 with everything included.  As I said, if that's too much money, binoculars are a better option.  A good pair (10 x 25) will run about $60 to $100.  With good binoculars you will be able to see craters on the moon, the Andromeda Galaxy, and star clusters.  You wil also be able to make out Saturn's rings and Jupiter's main moons and equatorial bands.\n\nThe nice thing about a telescope with a motor drive is you can stay focused on an object without constantly having to adjust the telescope.  The art of astronomy is not something you can pick up in a day.  Most people looking into a astronomical telescope for the first time won't be able to make out even one tenth as much as somebody with experience.  So, if you plan to spend some time with your new toy, it's well worth it to get something that will hold your interest.\n\nThe other nice feature about this particular telescope is that it doesn't flip things upside down (like most reflector scopes do), which means you can also look at land objects.  It does flip them horizontally, like a mirror image, but that's not a big deal.\n\nOne last thing:  For astronomy, magnification is the least concern.  You want light gathering ability.  No matter how powerfully you magnify a star, it's not going to get any bigger.  You want to see as big a field of the sky as you can.  Magnifying it just narrows the field to a few stars, which is highly uninteresting.  By the same token, if you view the Moon, magnification helps somewhat, but it just makes things bigger and fuzzier, not any clearer.  A tiny detail in sharp focus is much better than that same detail made large and fuzzy.
580528
The biggest question is how much do you want to spend?  The second question is what type of quality do you want?\n\nI use a Zeiss Diavari 3-12x56 *T*.  That cost me a pretty penny, but it's an excellent scope, illuminated, and has a lifetime warranty.\n\nWhatever scope you decide to buy, I recommend that you get one that's illuminated.  When you are out at dusk or dawn and try to put black cross hairs on a dark body in very little light, that little red dot is a HUGE asset.
18815
if you want acuracy go .20 if you want speed go .12 the best brand i have found is lasersoft the red or blue colors
197213
As someone else already said, *never* buy a telescope that markets itself primarily based on magnification.  This is a sure sign that not only is the manufacturer playing on common assumption, but also that the scope itself is probably junk.\n\nThat said, I used--and still use--such a telescope that I got for a present as a kid.  If you treat it well, it will work well enough.  A few pointers, though:\n\n1.)  Do not use the telescope above about 120x.\n2.)  The tripod will almost certainly be jittery in the slightest wind; you may want to weigh it down with something.\n3.)  Don't use the Barlow.  You should probably ditch the eyepieces as well, which I'm guessing are cheesy Ramsdens or Huygenians; even mine at least came with a decent Kellner.  If you see an "SR", "R", or "H" symbol on the eyepieces, save your strength--order a few basic eyepieces from a reputable dealer (Orion, Meade, Celestron, etc.), perhaps with an adapter as well, from .965 to 1.25 for a better field of view.\n\nUnfortunately, ordering this extra equipment will put you well above $100, making it almost worth returning the scope and buying a more expensive one.  I leave that judgment to you, though--as someone else already wrote, this telescope could at least whet your appetite for something better.\n\nI'm sorry I can't be cheerier, but good luck.  For what it's worth, there are a few excellent, but relatively cheap scopes that can be had from Orion for $200 and under, namely their XT 4.5, which has had nothing but stellar reviews.