how can i express the following English sentences as compound propositions using p, q, r and s and the operators, <, >, -.\n\na)Mary speaks French and Spanish.\nb)Mary and Susan speak French.\nc)Susan doesn’t speak either French or Spanish.\nd)Susan speaks French but Mary doesn’t.=
121991
Uuuuuuuuuuuum...........that makes my day at work tomorrow seem much easier.WOW! I'm sorry i don't know but i think you a clever bunny all the same. :o)
277321
I can't believe all these people saying "Mark and I"  !!!  "Mark and me" is correct!\n\nSimply take "Mark" out of the sentence and see if it sounds right.\n\n"Could you please copy I on these communications?"  It doesn't work!\n\nAnd the first one is correct.  The second sentence uses the reflexive pronoun "myself," which doesn't make any sense.  Could you please copy myself on these communications?  You would not ask somebody to do it, if you were going to do it yourself.
607539
The statement number 1 is grammatically correct.\n(Other answerers - To be grammatically correct, a sentence should not be meaningful -- Consider this: I saw some cars flying near the bottom of the Pacific Ocean when I was eating iron sheets)
253472
The answer is B.  \n\nA compound sentence can be taken apart to form two complete sentences:\n\nSue gave Jim a new racket.  He left for the tennis courts.
554703
1) D --none of the others are complex, only have prepositional phrases\n2) A- this is iffy, but B is compound, not complex. C is simple. D is compound.\n3) C- the other choices are all complex sentences.
306763
Your sentence structure is passive.  To make it active, make the subject of the sentence the administrators and people of the community instead of "the reason," which merely "is."  For example: "Administrators and people of the community hear the same laundry list of complaints from industry leaders in the community," or whatever it is your "reason" is.\n\nGood luck.
454652
these are all definitely right...\n\n1.  "you" -- objective pronoun\n\n2.  "he"  -- subjective pronoun\n\n3.  "her"  -- objective pronoun\n\n4.  "she"  -- subjective pronoun\n\n5.  "it"  -- objective pronoun
207396
C. Sandy washed and ironed her clothes\n\nwashed and ironed her clothes is the predicate and the "and" make it compound
491897
you can say:\n\n¿Te gustaría casarte conmigo?\n¿Te casarías conmigo?\n¿Desearías casarte conmigo?\n¿Quieres casarte conmigo?
619293
R2:\nis transitive since (a,b) in R2 and (b,c) in R2, then a<b and b<c so a<b<c and (a,c) is in R2.\nis not reflexive, since (a,a) is not in R2, because a=a and so a is not less than a.\nis not symmetric since (a,b) is in R2, thus a<b and b is not less than a, thus (b,a) is not in R2.\n\nR1:\nis transitive as above.\nis reflexive, since a=a, so a leq a, thus (a,a) in R1\nis not symmetric, since (1,2) in R1, but (2,1) is not in R1.\n\n\nR3:\nis transitive, as above.\nis reflexive, as above.\nis symmetric, since (a,b) in R3, thus a=b and b=a.  Therefore (b,a) in R3.\n\nThus R3 is the only "equivalence relations," or a relation that is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.\n\ngood question.
14850
Like this:\n\nConsole.Write( "This " );\nConsole.Write( "is on a single line." )\n\nConsole.WriteLine( "" );\nConsole.WriteLine( "This is on a different line" );\nConsole.WriteLine( "This is too!" );
384814
He can't trust her anymore : il ne peut plus la croire\nHe could no longer trust her : il ne pouvait plus la croire\n\nIn French we would translate "anymore and no longer" by "plus" instead of using the regular "pas"\n\nDon't trust what google translation said. I just read the 2 translation 2 posts below mine and this ain't French. The words are not in the correct order. Sorry for the person who posted it.
74237
Here are some ideas.  And you could modify them based on your time limit and the grade level.  Best of luck.\n\nhttp://teacher.scholastic.com/lessonrepro/lessonplans/profbooks/spotlitestrongverbs.pdf\n\nhttp://teacher.scholastic.com/lessonrepro/lessonplans/profbooks/adverbcharades.pdf\n\nhttp://teacher.scholastic.com/lessonrepro/reproducibles/profbooks/predicates.pdf
447990
By each sentence:\n\nThe simple subject is a noun or pronoun that does something.\nThe predicate is the action word...it's what's happening.\n\n1.  Earnest and Raoul  - 2 simple subjects\n.....now you fill in the predicate.....what they did?\n\n2.  Leadbelly is the subject....\nverb has two worlds....and it's not simple so by having two words in the predicate, it is compound....\n....so what did Leadbelly do?....predicate 2 words is:has _________.\n3. You is the subject\n.....what did you do...... first part of the predicate is have.....you misspelled the rest of the verb.\n\n4.  Leadbelly is the subject\n....what did Leadbelly do.......\nI'll give you this one......the predicate is:    was\n\nSo subjects :  do something...or are something,\npredicates or verbs:  are the action words, are what the subjects do, or ....are something....am, is, was, were......\n\nI hope this helps!!!
74459
It's a shame the asker didn't include more of the surrounding text from this article so it could be analyzed more closely.  \n\nAnyhow, grammarians will concur that the structure:  \n\n"...active surveillance and robust peer intervention among high-risk groups such as female sex workers had had an impact in the South..." ,\n\nIS, technically, correct.  Sacramento Dweller was correct in identifying this seemingly awkward grammatical structure as a matter of tense.  Sentences utilizing this particular structure generally fall under the category of "Conditional Sentences."  Sentences featuring the 'had had' syntax are classified as "The Third Conditional," or "Conditional Type Three," and can generally be diagnosed by analyzing them for similarities with following structural formulae:\n\n(The Type 3 Conditional / Third Conditional Formula:)\n\n" IF + <insert past perfect tense verb> + <insert perfect conditional tense verb> = RESULT OF SUPPOSED CONDITIONS.*\n\n*~NOTE:  RESULT(S) of the supposed conditions usually resemble one of the following two structures, depending on when events occurred:  \n\n(1.) Result:  <insert simple present or past tense verb to express an obvious, or predictable fact / outcome>\n\n(2.) Result:  <insert modal verb  + simple present or past tense verb to express a known fact / outcome >\n\nEXAMPLE #1:  "If you had had proper training as an assassin, we would not be in this situation..."\n\nEXAMPLE #2:  "If I'd had proper training as an assassin, you probably wouldn't be here to complain."\n\n(Notice how in EXAMPLE #2, the contractions 'I'd' is used instead of saying, 'I had had' to illustrate the terms of the condition being discussed, though still allowing the reader to ascertain and understand the time-frame and sequence in which events occcurred?)\n\nRules for proper usage of the "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure state that the structures are 'to be used when talking about unreal, or "hypothetical" situations occurring in the past.'  That means, the related events DID NOT 'ACTUALLY' HAPPEN in the past.  Sentences utilizing this structure are almost always phrased to reckon, "If circumstances were different, what could / would have this been like?"  \n\nThe expression of time / tense in this [third] variety of conditional sentence structure IS identified as the past, and indicates that an action was completed "in" the past.  The condition and / or result, therefore, cannot logically be fulfilled because the action in the "IF" clause never actually happened.  Action in "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure is almost ALWAYS characterized by the quality of being absurd, and impossible to achieve.\n\nTense and Terminology?\n\n-Simple Present Tense:  Expresses a fact, habit/routine, or ability.\n\n-Simple Past:  Implies that the action happened before and is not happening anymore.\n\n-Past Perfect (Pluperfect) Tense:  Relates that an action or event ended prior to another action or event.\n\n-Present Perfect (Continuous) [Past-composite] Tense:  Indicates either events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Perfect (Conditional) Tense: Relates varying degrees of certianty or uncertainty about events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Modal Verbs:  incorporated with other verbs to illustrate the notion of possibility, impossability, necessity or other degree of probability.
77247
well, follow your heart. don't follow your head. if your heart says that your sentence is right, it'll be right. but, first, read up your basics. for examples, singular and plural. i only know singular and plural and i can score the best in my english in my school. if u can't, the best u can do is just shoot!!
580961
OK, I've heard a variation on this question.  It is a trick question, and it does have an answer, but the question has to be worded *exactly* right or it won't work.\n\nI saw the question posted this way:\n****\nTwo words that end with "GRY" are "angry" and "hungry".  There are only three words in the English language; the third is something you use every day, and if you've read carefully, I've already told you what it is.\nWhat's the third word?\n****\n[think for a moment before reading further]\n\nThe answer is ....\n\nLANGUAGE\n\nThe trick lies in the wording of the second sentence.  It says that there are only three words in "the English language".  Most people assume that this means "3 words in the English language that end in 'gry'". \n\nAs I said, the trick is that the second sentence has nothing to do with the first sentence.  The phrase "the English language" has three words, and the third one, "language", is something you use every day.\n\nClear as mud, right? :-)