The grammar rule for loan and lend
134504
Loan generally refers to monetary and lend generally refers to items.\nI'll loan you $50\nI'll lend you my tools.
29740
They can be used as both nouns and verbs.
546090
None of them.  \n\nA, C, and D are grammatically incorrect.\n\nB is wrong because the pronoun is not capitalized correctly.
532656
Very nice; you must have picked up on the hidden clue.\n\nFrankly, it all depends.  I personally am not very found of grammatical rules, as they seem to be inherently limiting.  As far as I am concerned, you can throw the majority of those rules out the window, as long as you can express yourself clearly and be easily understood.   Case in point: Linguists and English professors do NOT usually make great writers, do they?   In principle, of course, one can always make a strong formal English punctuation argument in favor of your choice "b".  But to me "a" looks much "prettier".   So the question is: Should we keep shoving food into our mouths, mindlessly chewing, and promptly swallowing till our stomachs are full, or should we try to eat less, but eat with our eyes and palates too?   I suppose, it all depends on the circumstances and your point of view.   For instance, if you end up in a hospital with a sever case of malnutrition and dehydration, they “ain’t” “gonna” care much about how you are gonna eat or drink, as long as they end up pumping enough liquids and nutrients into you to save your life.   ... The punctuation waters start getting even murkier as more and more people begin to impose their own rules and restrictions on-line.   Ironically-enough (notice I said Ironically-enough and NOT anomalously-enough LOL) take your own example in this here on-line Y!A milieu, for instance.    The Y!A software will automatically add a question mark (i.e. a "?") to the end of every statement posted, no matter what you do, and be it really a question or NOT!  (And still, they dare to complain that some of those questions aren’t exactly questions)!  LOL    Hence, in a Y!A environment at least, both your choices would be forced into a punctually incorrect stratosphere (for "a" would become "lovelorn"??, and "b" would be transformed into "lovelorn?"?) and the only correct choice would appear to be “the initially incorrect one”, namely just “lovelorn”.  … Now, go figure!   LOL     … Yes my friend, even the oracle should strive for anomalism, at times.  :-)
325690
http://loans.mamayek.com/autoloans.html
72260
yarm grammar if you have the cash!
312322
The first one is correct.\n\nThe second would be correct if you changed the is to has.\n\nHTH
230405
Both are correct.  The verb is "give back" and both objects may optionally be moved between the main part of the verb "give" and the particle "back".  The two preceding posters, while well-meaning, are absolutely wrong.
567951
The problem is that I don't know exactly how to help you with this because I don't know what level of syntax you are at.  Depending on the textbook and the teacher, you will have been taught different ways of doing this, and I'm not sure which way is the way you are supposed to do it.\n\nHowever, for beginners at drawing trees, here are a couple of tips that might be helpful.\n1. First, label each word with its part of speech.  Examples are noun, verb, adjective, etc.\n2. Combine the words into phrases.  If your book/teacher uses phrase-structure rules, use these rules to build the tree.  For example, one phrase-structure rule that is often used to make noun phrases is NP->determiner + noun.  So if you have a determiner and a noun, you can combine them into a noun phrase.\n3. Continue building phrases out of the new phrases you are making until you join the tree at the top.  For example, a common phrase-structure rule for the top of the tree is S->NP + VP.  So if you have a noun phrase and a verb phrase, you can join them together and call them S.\n\nAgain, the rules you are using (or even whether you use rules) will depend on how far you are into this and what book and teacher you have.\n\nThis bottom-up way of building trees seems to work pretty well for beginners.  After you become more comfortable with drawing trees you may learn to start at the top after a while.  Either way the product is the same: a diagram that shows hierarchical relationships between the elements of a sentence.\n\nHappy syntaxing!
171087
second conditional.\n\nThe first conditional is like "If I get a lot of money, I'll (I will) buy a boat.\n\nThe third conditional is like "If I had had a lot of money, I would have bought a boat."\n\nFirst conditional is fairly likely; second conditional is unlikely or untrue; third conditional didn't happen and now can't.
603674
Here you go...\nhttp://english.donnayoung.org/pos/helpingverbs.htm
379045
you can go to http://grammar.uoregon.edu/verbs/transitive.html\nand http://grammar.uoregon.edu/verbs/intransitive.html to have a look.
378613
Here you go. \n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loan_shark
503456
This might help you...\n\nhttp://www.edict.com.hk/vlc/clauses/participleclause.htm
416034
something is wrong with the sentence structure.
479232
Your grammer needs work
9514
I have never heard of this rule before, and I'm a grammar teacher, so I don't think anyone will get mad if you violate it.\n\nHowever, the form of your sentence that would fit the rule would be: "Come to Manchester, in which we will meet some interesting people."\n\nIt doesn't really do anything for me, either.