1. Did you vote for him?\n2. What do you think of him?\n3. Should he be impeached?\n4. Next President - Republican or Democrat?
136846
NO! I think he is a greedy man.  He looks like the devil on t.v. Get him out of office,but He needs to finish the mess he started though. Democrat all the way!
579976
Lived to see many presidents come and go . I have never seen the likes of GWB. Wish people would have seen through him earlier, but I believe both elections were fixed.If united we stand is America's moto , where does he fit in???
164488
I'm no professional. However.\n\nWell you should be concerned about impeachment. It is a serious matter. But I feel the real question should be the motives of those calling 'off with his head'.\n\nOf those many people you speak of how many are registered Democrat. I don't care for many of the things Bush has done or how they were done. But you won't hear me mention impeach as to what should be done.\n\nThe Democrats have not faired well in the past twelve years. The lost Congress and then the White House. And yet with all they complain about Bush has done wrong do you hear Democratic leaders talking impeachment?  When Russ Feingold talked censure recently the reaction from other Democrats wasn't support. They shunned him like the plague in the dark ages.\n\nDislike Bush as they do, Democrats are not about to try and impeach Bush. They would love to have his head on a platter. But they may be afraid of the outcome if they didn't succeed. After losing so many elections in a row, plus their failed opposition to the recent Supreme Court nominees. To even attempt an impeachment could spell the end of the Democrats. Democrats know it's not worth the gamble. \n\nBesides even if they win who do they get? Cheney. And they have to start all over again. And who do they get then? Hasert. It's a lose-lose sitation. \n\nAnd then there's the matter of is what Bush has done impeachable? It should be obvious to the spectator the Democratic leadership doesn't think so. \n\nIf they believed impeachment proceedings were really warrented, they would be pushing hard. Even though they could be shot down by the Republican majority. Because to do so would let them re-establish some moral principle capital. At the same time 'demonstrating' how morally bankrupt the Republicans are. That would be a win-win situatioon for the Democrats.\n\nWhat I've written is political common sense. Wait a minute. Is political common sense an oxymoron?\n\nYou have a good day. No have a FAANNNNNNTASTIC day!
578347
I laughed so hard at this answer.\n-----------------------------------------------------------------------\nThe Republicans like him because he could hold together a majority and get laws they favored passed. He is know worse then any other politician, just much more effective. I'm a liberal, and I would love someone like him on our side, we just get flakes, \n-----------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nThat because all you libs are flakes.  \n\nAnyway to answer the question: \nFrom what has been disclosed to the public about the charges against him, there is no case.  He is essentially being charged with helping get a donation to the Republican party with the understanding that that much money would come back to him from the Republican party to help with his campaign.\n\nThis goes on all the time, it is why all the campaign finance laws to date are all ridiculous.  Let me break it down some for you.\nNow parts of this have changed with McCains idiotic campaign finance reform law that by some miracle got past the Supreme Court but that is after the fact and another discussion.  Delays issues come from before that.\n\nThe law says YOU can only give so much money to a person running for office i.e. hard money.\nThe law says YOU can give all the money you would like to the political party of your choice i.e. soft money.\nThe political parties then decide how much of the total monies they have to give to individual's running for office.\n\nSurely you can see how absurd this is, but that was the law, what you could not do "wink, wink" is give a big donation to a individual by washing it through the party, knowingly.  But this is of course EXACTLY what everyone did.  It is actually why the idiotic McCain bill came to pass in the first place because everyone did what DeLay was accused of.\n\nThis is all simply a political move to force DeLay to step down, because he was killing the libs in Congress.  He got things done, the way they are supposed to get done and he was good at it.  Much like Newt Gingrinch who was also very good at what he did, so they targeted him.  \n\nThe real discussion here should be campaign financing.  Any limits put on campaign donations, essentially restricts your right to free speach.  Which is exactly the type of speech the 1st Amendment was geared at.  The idiotic McCain bill, put even more restrictions of things, but like all politicians they left loop holes so that you could circumvent the laws.   What needs to be done and what ALL American's should be demanding (especially the libs) is no restrictions in anyway whatsoever on campaign donations, but also FULL disclosure of who donated and how much and when.
84745
Good or honorable unfortunately is irrelevant when it comes to politics. The question is has he actually done what he said he would do or not.\nHe said we'd get a tax check: I did\nHe said he'd wage war on terrorists: he is\nHe said he was anti abortion: he is\nAnyone know of something he said he would do that he didn't?\nJust a thought
528225
Bush never worked with his own party so I don't think his brain is going to adjust. He will maintain his "stay the course" attitude and veto everything the Dem's try. I think he should be impeached but the next to go will be Denis Hastert when the page porn investigation is completed.
618807
I am a Republican.  Too bad President Bush can't run again.  I would vote for him a third time.  Maybe we will get lucky and Jeb will run for President.
128666
freetyme813 ... "we have you to pay our taxes" .... such an honest answer from such a typical republican...\n\nLadies and Gentlemen... this is the prime example of your leadership... and I can think of no better reason of why to not vote Republican at the next election...
645092
Issue one ....  Environmental responsibility - I want to be able to live and not just survive.\n\nIssue two ....   Bring home the troops - I don't like spending my money so that the rich can get richer.\n\nIssue three ...  Government accountability returned to the people of the U.S. and out of the multinationals (large businesses with global interests).\n\nI'll vote for anyone who can address my concerns and not just in words but in action.
433793
I'm a repulican and I don't think he will be considered a good president. I don't think he is a good president. When he was Governor of Texas, he was a very good Governor. He bult a lot of new roads (which we needed), he imporved education and was very good at reaching across the aisle to democrats. Our Lt. Governor was Bob Bullock(a democrat) and he endorsed Bush for Prez. I don't know what happened to him once he reached Washington.
86791
cherriest14 - A few points for you:\n\nFIRST: Just who in the hell did Cheney shoot and kill??? Harry Whittington was accidentally shot by Cheney on a hunting trip. Whittington not only survived the accident but has already been released from the hospital. A far cry from being killed in my book.\n\nAnd you think no one blinked an eye over the incident? The media went after Cheney as if he had driven the last nail on the cross over it. Did you not pay attention to the news the entire two weeks after the incident??\n\nSECONDLY: Clinton's bl0wj0b did not almost get him impeached. Here are the fact:\n\n* Clinton received oral from Monica Lewinsky.\n* Clinton lied under oath about said services\n* Clinton got caught lying and was impeached (impeachment is the process of being charged ... NOT the processed of being removed from office)\n* Clinton WAS impeached, tried and not convicted\n\nI said not convicted intentionally, because he was guilty of the charges - he admitted it and received a censure from Congress and had to withdraw from the bar for five years.\n\nWe conservative are not angry over the bl0wj0b. Hell, if I was President, I'd be hiring new interns on a daily basis. As the chief law enforcement officer of the land, it was unacceptable for Clinton to impede the investigation as much as he did and lie under oath about what happened. You don't think that if someone is questioning the President under oath, they pretty much have him nailed already??\n\nTHIRD: Why don't you do some basic research before you spout off your parroted idealogical bullsh!t. It just makes you look really, really stupid.
548352
Honestly, I did vote for him.\n\nKerry did not have any proof or way of fixing the war and the problems. He just said he was going to do it without any explaination.\n\nAnd then I asked myself...\n\n"Who would Osama or Hussein want to win?"\n\nObviously, they would want Kerry. So.... I voted for Bush.\n\nThere were several other reason why I voted for him like leaving the desert for offroad racing, etc..... but those are the main reasons to why I voted for Bush.\n\n\nBut let me tell you... I am upset with what is going on now. I don't regret my vote, since Kerry has pretty much shown he is crazy lately, but I am disappointed with how Bush is handling everything.
58478
I don't think he should be held responcible for what others have done. I think he should be impeached, then arrested and tried in a world court for his crimes against humanity for starting and unjust war in the first place, and then keeping prisinors off shore without due process. If convicted he should be sentenced to life in prison without parole.
111362
Why he is a wonderful man just ask him. In another country he would be concidered an evil dictator, all I got to say is thank god for term limits as I know that the repuglican congress lacks the gonads to do anything about him. He has done enough damage to this country though and I hope democrats get out and vote in the congressional election this November.
224083
I'm all for impeaching Bush. Get him and his entourage out of there before they either a) finally succeed in bankrupting the country, or b) touch off WWIII. This administration is answerable under the Constitution of the United States, as previous administrations were, and November, I feel, will prove that for all and sundry to see.\nWe need reforms, good, honest reforms, and these guys to rid off into the sunset or whatever...
1458
Not too good. \nCan't wait for his term to expire.\n\nPeace
56004
AGAINST HIM!!!  He is a liar and a cheat!  I don't think we have ever had such a worthless President.  I can not figure out one positive he has done in office.  Not one!  When the first 4 years were done, we had our chance.  Like idiots, the American people voted him back in.  He cheated to get in the first time (thanks Jeb!) and we give it to him the next term.  I am not a republican or democrat, I am the best candidate for the job type person.  I know this last election was the lesser of two evils, but come on.  Who has more to gain from the oil industry than the Bush family?  He wanted to finish what daddy couldn't.  And what has that gotten us?  Not a d@mn thing but lives lost and a war that will never be finished.  The truly scary fact is:  look at how many influential positions that are now held by Bush supporters.  He is a liar and I hope what goes around comes around.  If he is speaking....he is lying!