Also, is George Mason the lowest seed to make it to the Final Four?\nMy favorite to win is Goerge Mason and I also think they will win.
122289
George Mason is my favorite\nFlorida is going to win it all\nUCLA is living on borrowed time, unless they get the same officials as the gonzaga game\nLSU ............
84937
Number 1 seeds would be: Duke, UCONN, Nova, and Memphis but Ohio State could take this is they win the Big 10 Tourney.\n\n2 Seeds: Ohio State (but Memphis is O State wins), George Washington, North Carolina, and Gonzaga.\n\n3 seeds: Pitt, Texas, LSU and Tennesee\n\n4 seeds: UCLA, Washington, Iowa, and West Vergina\n\nI want Duke to win it all but 10 teams have a legit shot to do it.
529495
Bottom half of the Playoff bracket again. If Kobe will put some trust into his teammates, next season they cold break into the top half. They could sneak into the second round this year.
306872
Well, let's see... the "heralded" Dean Smith only had 2 nat'l championships in like 39 yrs of coaching (including) nearly 20 yrs with a field of 32 teams as opposed to 64/65, and Coach K has 3 already!! Oh, and I love the argument that UNC's players do better in the NBA. Shouldn't that prove that Krzyzewski has done more with LESS? Here's a good question for the cheese and whine crowd of Chapel Hill, "would you rather have Jordan, Worthy and Perkins, or Hill, Laettner and Hurley?" Uh-huh... exactly, you picked the 'heels there, didn't ya? But, which 3-some won 2 Nat'l Championships? That's right!! The Blue-Devils, baby! That's my answer... need more proof? Coach K is unequalled. More ACC championships? Duke. More final fours? Duke. Nat'l Champs? 3 each (sorry, i don't recognize the 30's when there were 8 teams). but, then again, we haven't K for 39 years-- he'll have 2 more. Thanks for a great question. Don't listen to the heels fans, they have no creedence! LOL
124331
You and I share 1 out of 4 picks to get to the Final Four. LSU will be dominated by Duke, Villanova has a clear weakness and that is the fact that they start 4 gaurds and no center. UNC's starting lineup is entirely made of freshmen, and the only pick you and I share is Gonzaga. 1 name:Adam Morrison. 1 purpose: Hit every shot he takes. ANd he does.
119163
There has never been a 16th seed team to beat the 1st seed.  There have been one or two close calls, if you want to look at those look at ESPN, there was an article about it today.
119869
I think Florida has the best chance to win it all.\n\nGeorgetown lost to them by 4 pts early in the NCAA's, but other than that, no one's been able to stay in a game with them.  They are playing the best of any of the final four teams.\n\nThey are big and athletic, and Noah can dominate a game on both ends of the floor if he wants to.\n\nComplacency is the only thing that can derail the Gators at this point.
43062
Right now the 3 favorites are JJ Redick, Adam Morrison and Rudy Gay. I think Redick will likely be the first pick because he is very well known and very talented.\n\nAdam Morrison is also a possiblity because he is always reliable, but the fact that he has diabetes will definitely make some teams reluctant to pick him.\n\nRudy Gay is the best all-around player in college hoops, as he puts up consistent numbers in every category. He has a lot of hype, so if he continues to live up to it at UCONN, I would not be shocked if he is taken #1 overall.
72809
Duke was.  I don't know why Nova got the winner of the opening round game, but when the seeds were announced on CBS, they announced Duke as the overall number 1.
89527
UCLA vs George Mason\n\nGeorge Mason
187291
not until they get rid of tubby smith. sweet 16s are nice @ georgia but UK is used to final 4s.
384715
Good question\n\nNotre Dame should be #4\n\nOSU is gonna blow out Michigan though!!!!!!!!!!!
262032
Good question. Of those three, I would pick Villanova over Georgetown as a SLIGHTLY greater upset than NC State over Houston...\n\nThe reason for my pick is that Georgetown had lost by 1 pt to North Carolina in Patrick Ewing's freshman year 1982. They proceeded to win the National Championship in 1984, so they were the defending NCAA Champions going into the Villanova game.\n\nHouston, on the other hand, was just starting to come into their own in 1983, the year they lost to N C State on a last second dunk by Lorenzo Charles of an air ball shot. Houston then lost to Georgetown the next year, 1984, also in the NCAA finals.  One of the reasons this was a huge upset, especially looking back on it, is the fact that the Houston Cougars at that time had two players who would eventually be named among the NBA's 50 greatest players ever in 1996, Akeem (as he was known then) Olajuwon and Clyde Drexler.\n\nTexas Western's win over Kentucky was not the upset that a lot of sportwriters today try to make it. Today they try to make it seem as though no one in the country thought blacks could compete with whites in basketball... which, even back then, was absurd... \n\nA decade before the game that supposedly changed basketball, the undefeated 1955-56 University of San Francisco team won the NCAA championship with a team that played four blacks — Bill Russell, K.C. Jones, Hal Perry and Gene Brown. \n\nIn 1958 the coaches' All-American team was all black — Wilt Chamberlain of Kansas, Oscar Robertson of Cincinnati, Bob Boozer of Kansas State, Guy Rodgers of Temple and Elgin Baylor of Seattle. \n\nIn 1962, the University of Cincinnati started four black players when it won the NCAA championship, and Loyola University of Chicago started four when it won in 1963."\n\n Frank Deford, a distinguished writer, covered the Texas Western-Kentucky game for Sports Illustrated and did not mention the fact of five black starters. Neither did The New York Times nor The Washington Post. Already the ascendancy of blacks in basketball was such that the four best players in the NBA were Chamberlain, Russell, Baylor and Robertson.\n\nKentucky was the top ranked team going into that finals game in 1966, but Texas Western was ranked third and had lost only one game, so it really didn't constitue a major upset.\n\nIf we consider the relative disparity in rankings of Houston and NC State, or Georgetown and Villanova, I would consider those to be much bigger upsets than T.Western over UK.
377603
even if they were to lose to a team as bad as Army, i dont think they would drop lower than 15. They're currently ranked #5 so the lowest they would drop to is about #15. They only way they would be able to stay in the top 10 is if there were a lot of upsets in the top 10 today but i don't see that happening.
57675
Well, they have 5 teams in the RPI top 30, and could conceivably get 6 teams in.  I'd expect at least these 4 to make it:\n\nWichita State\nSouthern Illinois\nMissouri State\nNorthern Iowa\n\nAnd these 2 are very good bubble teams:\n\nCreighton \nBradley\n\nStill a tad bit early to get firm predictions, especially on mid-major teams.  The only thing I can guarantee is that Duke,UConn, and Villanova are solid locks for 1 seeds, with the other one going to either Texas, Memphis, Gonzaga, or possibly Tennessee.
37069
They are probably on the wrong side of the bubble right now, and they haven't played that many good teams. They need to win the MAC Tourney in order to go dancing. So even if they did go, they would probably get beat in the first round, unless they were a #12 seed playing a #5. Then they would have a legit shot at the second round, where they wouldn't go any further.
499253
it will be an exciting season! we can never tell who will gonna win the title this year, and  with the old-fat o'neal, miami can't defend their title! and there's a lot of sleeper teams in the west, utah, lakers, houston!  \n\nwho's gonna win the scoring title? kobe? ai? lbj? we can never tell?\n\nhow about mvp? my vote goes to kb24!