OR WOULD HE BLOW HIM SELF UP FIRST?\nCAN TERRORIST BE CONVERTED TO THE WAY THEY WERE?\nA JUST NORMAL PERSON, LIKE ANYONE ELSE?\nWith problems like anyone else?
132834
Of course Osama would go talk with the Pope, but only after he stopped by the White House for lunch with George Bush.
515258
I think what would happen is the same thing that is happening today, only on a grander scale; innocents would be slaughtered by the thousands. Saddam was removed, in part, because he was killing his own people. Terrorists would gain control of the country and spread to other countries, as it is threatening to do now, with Syria and Iran. Then again, I could be wrong!!!! Good Luck!!!!
53758
I wouldnt be surprised if he did. Thats his job, he is supposed to be an advocate for peace.
522835
You are more likely to be a victim of crime than terrorism. This just shows you where their priorities lie. Scaremongering rather than solving.
456559
Kill him\n\n1. It will show terrorists that we and Iraq are serious about what we are doing. \n\n2. He is a killer.\n\n3. He must never walk the Earth again.\n\n4. You point about martyrdom is false.  You are showing that pacificism does not work.  We must deal with killers with violence.  When you have a bully, beat the jeepers out of him and he will go away.  \n\nTHE MAIN REASON WHY WE HAVE SO MUCH TERRORISM PROBLEMS IS WE DO NOT RESORT TO VIOLENCE.  WE ARE TOO SOFT ON PEOPLE WHO WANT TO KILL US.  WE DID NOT LEARN THE LESSONS FROM WW2: IGNORING EVIL ONLY MAKES IT HARDER TO GET RID OF LATER.
548442
Terrorists from ANY country could do a lot of damage...;
91525
YES! YES! and again yes.As you are already aware, in this world today,ecspecially in the Good Ole USA,you are either politically correct,bury your head in the sand,or speak out and be a radical trouble causing ungrateful citizen which is one step short of being a terrorist yourself.\nI'll just stop here.Thanks for letting me answer.
238360
no, they would have raised there hands and surrendered.\nFour levels of French Terror alert.\n1. Run\n2. Hide (where they are now)\n3. Surrender\n4. Collaborate
535709
Maybe, but not really because he is a muslim, but because he is a liberal.  And he's not just a liberal, hes a LIBERAL, big time.  I've researched him.  He's very leftists, so I do think he'll try to appease the islamic countries, and if he must use his religion to gain those means, I don't see that stopping him.  However, he's just one Representative.  In most likelyhood he wont affect foreign affairs whatsoever, and instead just get alot of pork (no pun intended, I swear) for his district like every other Representative tries to do
178720
Depends on his attitude and behaviour!!
225100
Good question!\n\nThe obvious answer is, a terrorists is anybody who kills people you like, and the guys killing people we don't like, aren't, they're FREEDOM fighters!\n\nSo you answer your own question -  If somebody blows-up YOUR loved ones, are they terrorists or freedom fighters?\n\nYou see, there's no absolute truths in life! truth is a function of the circumstances!\n\nAlways has been, always will.\n\nSo don't let the demigods, otherwise known as politicians, mislead you.  Everybody has an agenda.  If you seek absolute truth, it's gonna be a long journey!\n\nIn the meantime, I'm supporting those who kill people who want to do harm to people I like, like my kids and grandkids!\n\nVaya con dios, amigo!
290414
Only for the most radical and extreme elements of the Islam nations. Most rational people in that part of the world know that only bad things happen when WMD's are "in play". Being the cynic that I am, I could foresee all kinds of social and political unrest between the extremists and contemporary citizens, that is IF they stand up to the extemists....we'll see, if not, Holy Sh*t (no pun intended).
38620
Hell yeah.  I would have shot him in a heartbeat.  Ok...that wasn't the "politically correct" answer to give, but after being there, my bro-in-law is currently in Fallujah, and my hubby leaving in 2 weeks for his 2nd tour....I know how the insurgents will very easliy destroy themselves...ESPECIALLY if it means taking out 1 or more of our great soldiers.  I would much rather have one more dead insurgent(not IRAQI) than suffer more casualties of our troops.
269756
No.  We need someone to be the scapegoat. \n\nHowever, from Moussaoui's behavior in court, I think he should be jailed, whether he was to play a part in 9/11 or not.
110702
Yeah dude.  Plus, you don't know who's a terrorist, so you need to spy on everyone, and report all suspicious activity.  Including these kinds of questions.
565347
Agreed, and just for a preemptive strike I'd like to mention that someone will almost certainly come in here and say "IF U DUNT BELEAVE N HEL DEN Y R U AFEARD UV IT?! !! LOLZOAZLO"\nTo this I say, if someone threatened you, and perhaps even many of the people you love with torture would it not upset you even if you knew they would never actually go through with it? Isn't just the idea that they take pleasure in the thought enough to piss you off? I know it is for me.
328961
Keep him for yourself. I've heard a lot about how terrorists make great pets. You can train them to fetch, roll over, sit and play dead. They're REAL good at playing dead.