You liberals do know that impeaching/convicting President Bush will make Vice President Richard Cheney become the President, right?
132559
They are going to say that anybody that isn't liberal enough for them should be impeached for some reason or another. They are incapable of thinking ahead, so no, they don't realize that Cheney would be next in line.\n\nOh and by the way...to anybody that comes on here and uses Michael Moore's stupid movie to justify their answer...you make me laugh!
508341
Yes, I do have to agree many of these polls aren't ran fairly in respect for the Republicans.\nAlthough I don't think he should be impeached. Just so we can watch him attempt to fix what he's done.\nBut remember Rumsfield was fired to take the blame for the war. Now people are going after Cheney. After he's gone all that's left is Bush. And then I think he'll be a lot closer to being impeached.
571250
Do you have to make this sooooo hard?\n\nUm, Bush. No, wait, I mean Cheney. Or maybe Frist. Definitely Rove. Or DeLay. Ann Coulter? Too obvious. Rush Limbaugh getting busted with his Viagra? Things that make you go hmmm. \n\nDamn.\n\nI'll play this like Trivial Pursuit & go with my first instinct: \n\nBu$h.
256213
Yes and serious action has already been taken.\n\nReasons for impeachment:\n\nBush lied to Congress and the American public about the reasons for invading Iraq, conducted illegal wiretaps of American citizens, violated International Law by invading a sovereign country for illegal purposes, violated the Geneva Convention by torturing prisoners of war, held prisoners without formal charges and without legal representation, used government funds for domestic political propaganda, the Bush team used uniformed military personnel for Republican party political purposes, was negligent in his slow response to help victims of Hurricane Katrina, and shows contempt towards our Constitution and our democratic ideals.\n\nI do believe in proceeding with the impeachment process.  Congressman John Conyers and 29 cosponsors have already introduced a bill to form an impeachment panel.  After the November elections and the sweep of Democratic victories in recent special elections, support for impeachment will grow ever stronger.\n\nTrue, impeaching Bush would allow his brain, Cheney, to become president, but by that time the damage to the Republican Party would be irreversible. \n\nFor those who aren’t clear on the grounds for impeachment, please go to the link posted
545124
Shame on you Fire God!  Condemning a man for hypocrisy and wrongdoing based on innuendo.  What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?  Stepping down from his position is NOT an admission of guilt -- it's an acknowledgment that he realizes he won't be an effective leader until this matter is properly investigated.\n\nTo answer the question:  It has absolutely nothing to do with this election.  The liberals are grasping at every straw they can get their hands on to make conservatives look bad.
603478
No!\n\nArticles of Impeachment\n\nof\n\nPresident George W. Bush\n\nand\n\nVice President Richard B. Cheney,\nSecretary of State Condoleezza Rice,\nSecretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and\nAttorney General Alberto Gonzales\n\nThe President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. - - ARTICLE II, SECTION 4 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA\n\nPresident George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales have committed violations and subversions of the Constitution of the United States of America in an attempt to carry out with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes and deprivations of the civil rights of the people of the United States and other nations, by assuming powers of an imperial executive unaccountable to law and usurping powers of the Congress, the Judiciary and those reserved to the people of the United States, by the following acts:\n\n1) Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the  rule of law; carrying out a massive assault on and occupation of Iraq, a country that was not threatening the United States, resulting in the death and maiming of over one hundred thousand Iraqis, and thousands of U.S. G.I.s.\n\n2) Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.\n\n3) Authorizing, ordering and condoning direct attacks on civilians, civilian facilities and locations where civilian casualties were unavoidable. \n\n4) Instituting a secret and illegal wiretapping and spying operation against the people of the United States through the National Security Agency.\n\n5) Threatening the independence and sovereignty of Iraq by belligerently changing its government by force and assaulting Iraq in a war of aggression.\n\n6) Authorizing, ordering and condoning assassinations, summary executions, kidnappings, secret and other illegal detentions of individuals, torture and physical and psychological coercion of prisoners to obtain false statements concerning acts and intentions of governments and individuals and violating within the United States, and by authorizing U.S. forces and agents elsewhere, the rights of individuals under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.\n\n7) Making, ordering and condoning false statements and propaganda about the conduct of foreign governments and individuals and acts by U.S. government personnel; manipulating the media and foreign governments with false information; concealing information vital to public discussion and informed judgment concerning acts, intentions and possession, or efforts to obtain weapons of mass destruction in order to falsely create a climate of fear and destroy opposition to U.S. wars of aggression and first strike attacks.\n\n8) Violations and subversions of the Charter of the United Nations and international law, both a part of the "Supreme Law of the land" under Article VI, paragraph 2, of the Constitution, in an attempt to commit with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes in wars and threats of aggression against Afghanistan, Iraq and others and usurping powers of the United Nations and the peoples of its nations by bribery, coercion and other corrupt acts and by rejecting treaties, committing treaty violations, and frustrating compliance with treaties in order to destroy any means by which international law and institutions can prevent, affect, or adjudicate the exercise of U.S. military and economic power against the international community.\n\n9) Acting to strip Uni
7748
George W. Bush. I can guarantee that as soon as some Senators start to file impeachment proceedings and assasins start to load their guns, the TV comes on and they realize that Dick Cheney is second in line. The papers and guns go back in their cases. Cheney will keep Bush President as long as he stays around.\n\nUnless he chokes on another pretzel.
393672
No, it will be the same stuff probably. Except now we have historically more members of the government that don't have back bones, but when push comes to shove, politicians are paid propagandist liars, some are better at it than others of coarse. Look at all of the things that have been said about Bush thus far, whether you like the man or not.  Do you think that even if he would have made the exact opposite decisions he have been supported any more so, of coarse not. Politics is all about getting paid big bucks for doing very little and of coarse poop flinging and deceit plays a large role.
455571
Seems likely in view of the fact that two or three weeks ago Bush lied that Rumsfeld would be staying on for the next two years.  Apparently a lie since he "accepted" Rumsfeld's resignation the morning after the election.  Speaking of....if there is to be a trial against Rumsfeld, would it consider Bush and Cheney as accomplishes?
289622
Yes it is time for Bush to step down, unfortunately our system does not work that way, but people have lost confidence in his ability to lead. His popularity has dropped to 29%. We will have an election in November that could change things. If the democrats can get a majority in either chamber then there is a possibility that he will be impeached. His leadership will certainly be challenged at best.
438600
nancy could be madam pres by april if they impeach bush and try cheney for the haliburton no bid contracts.
129401
I certianly hope so.\n\nThe current President of the United States has shown little regard for out 3 tiered system of government and has done quite a few things that are impeachable.\n\nPresident Bush (acording to Libby), authorized the leak of classified information (in effect de-classifying parts of it), which resulted in the outing of a CIA operative as well as her contacts and assets.  He did this to defend the assertion that Iraq was attempting to aquire WMD's.  We now know that there were no WMD's in Iraq, and in retrospect we can see that the President sold out a CIA agent for a lie.\n\nAs Iraq disintegrates beneath us, as Afganistan fades into obscurity, as Osama Bin Laden roams free and we talk about dropping nuclear weapons on Iran, we need to step back and really look at this spoiled child that somehow got into the White House.\n\nCan Bush be impeached?  Oh, yes.  He sure can.\n\nShould Bush be impeached?  Absolutely.  \n\nWill he be impeached?  That is up in the air.  Let's see how the elections go.
37429
I think he is there until the end of his term. In order to impeach him, there will need to be evidence of laws that were broken. So far, there have been none. There have been a lot of unethical things, but nothing illegal. People talk about illegal wire taps. If it was illegal, then why are the democrats now trying to change the laws to make it illegal? \n\nWhat Bush is doing is finding loopholes in current laws and exploiting them. Whether it is right or wrong doesn't matter. You can't impeach a President for following the law. I'm not a Bush supporter, but I do think the liberals are overreacting way too much.
196368
An amusing thought but I think the truth is far more sinister. This is GOP hubris at its zenith. They think they're literally above the law and can do as they please. The vile bush administration is beyond corrupt; they're evil, arrogant and mad with power. Notwithstanding an almost nonexistent brain, bush thinks himself a god who can do no wrong and who needn't follow his own bloody rules (this leak issue being the latest such example). It's a disgrace, just as it was a national disgrace that these hateful people were ever put in power in the first place. The damage they've inflicted upon this country will endure for more years than I care to count. Impeachment would be the very least punishment he and his criminal cohorts warrant. I'd be satisfied with nothing short of long-term imprisonment, which of course means I'll not be satisfied at all. None of these scoundrels will ever be properly punished, bush least of all. It's a joke.
600958
Impeach Bush & Cheney
545875
What people don't understand, is during the trial for impeachment, if Bush were found guilty, Cheney would be found guilty of C.A.H. also, and would Not become the next President. \n\nIs this why people are afraid to attempt to impeach Bush?  If an investigation began for impeachment process, we could all see Cheney is the puppet master. \n\nUnfortunately, the Dem's are having to battle a deeply embedded evil power that goes beyond Bush.  Things will only get worse. \n\n.
676132
definetly the last one..i hope someone hurries up and gives bush a bj so we can impeach him too