what is the differeies between contract for and contract of
123788
your birthday is 28th november 1978!
40245
Using "of" indicates a specific point or instance during the event.  Using "in" indicates that the event is continuous or over a certain period.  In this case, the event is ambiguous as to its length, and so "at one point in time" is correct, whereas "at the start of the evening" indicates specifically when.
207959
Where are you?  That makes a huge difference.  If you signed a contract you need to check and see if there is a clause in there about that.  To be really sure you need to contact a lawyer in your area that specializes in labor law.  It varies so much from country to country and even state to state in the U.S.
507431
Contracts are suppose to be as you understand them to be.  Meaning, the definition of words often come into play when matters are taken to court, and understanding it factors in.  That's what the courts are to determine.  Note:  It's not about who's right and who's wrong, or even if it's a truth or a lie, It's ONLY about what the law is and how it can be applied.  The tables could be turned on you by asking why you signed the contract then?  Focus more on the illegal eviction and gather your evidence, you've got to have evidence, instead of the error in the lease.  After all she can always prove she owns the property right?  Find out if she's even renting a legal or illegal unit as well.  Search her name and business name in the Superior Courts to see if she's evicted anyone else, check her pattern out.  Find out if she actually owns the property too,  maybe it's it someone elses name.....should be public record.  You might want to consider, if she accepts your rent payment, to write "paid under protest" in the notation area or something like that.  Keep in mind that she can lie when this goes to court too and if you told her something or asked for repairs and they were denied, do you have proof of that?  Becasue you have this contract with her and you're suppose to abide by the rules right?  Well, that also means that she's got a contract with you and she's suppose to abide by those rules just the same.  If she's not honoring the contract, it could help.\n\nThere are also a lot of eviction defense lawyers that can offer free services, free advice.  The courts may offer this too, somewhere to go at the court house and they look at your papers and tell you what you have and don't have.  They'll tell you what to do but they won't do it for you.
398459
Without reference to English law specifically, the difference is permanence. An easement implies a permanence that is not necessarily present with a license (or, as you'd spell it, licence.)\n\nOrdinarily an easement is a recorded document that runs with the ownership of the land - it's an irrevocable right. A license, by its nature, may be for a limited period or may be revoked under certain conditions.
205223
Start date-\n\nWhen will this begin to take effect or\nWhen will you start the job\n\nASAP - As soon as posible\n\nIn contracts, a start date is normally required. ASAP is a popular answer to this this question. In simple language it means right now or as soon as you can gather your things together.\n\nTime is of the essence. Don't delay any longer than absolutely neccessary to begin.
106635
Can I work for you?  I hope so, because I can't wait to sue you into the ground.  Without a contract, you open the door to everything and anything someone can dream up.  You're taking an obscene risk not using an employment contract.  Without a contract, it's totally he said-she said, and you have no defense if some claim arises against you.  Contracts aren't "fussy", they simply state the expectations of each party.  They are meant to ensure everyone understands what is required of them.\n\nAnd if someone won't sign a contract with you (assuming it's a reasonable contract), then you don't want them working for you anyway.
33690
why are u confused?\nare you looking for Indian law of Contract? if yes then you can ask anything. i'll answer.\nmuse_christ@yahoo.com
107249
It depends upon the contract. If there was an agreement to make it effective upon the date of filing, then it's on the date of filing. If there was no mention of the date of effectivity in the contract, as a general rule, it should be effective on the date of signing.
654767
http://www.lectlaw.com/def.htm
649143
Best scenario would be to consult with a legal professional on what's appropriate for your business needs.\nBut you can look at some legal docs online you might find useful... Just make sure you both agree to the terms.\n\nhttp://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2006-20,GGLG:en&q=legal+document+contract
324370
It's not a matter of grammar, but of usage.  "For free" is an idiom that is considered "informal" (that is, between "formal" and "slang"), but NOT incorrect.
93707
As for your first question, under the UCC, the additional terms become part of the contract if the parties are merchants unless the offeree expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer, materially alters the contract or the offeree objects within 10 days. If this is the case, then the offeree has made a counter offer and there is no contract. \n\nSo if one party is not a merchant, then the additional or different terms are merely proposals and are disregarded(mean nothing). \n\nYou need to read 2-207 carefully and get a good Barbri outline.
46827
I cant find an exact example but if you continue having trouble try this website\n\nhttp://contracts.onecle.com/bbsports/nanula.emp.1999.11.24.shtml\n\nthats one or you can browse down a whole list of examples at\n\nhttp://contracts.onecle.com/type/2.shtml\n\n\nlook to the left and find the catagory of contract examples you want
637130
It would be absurd for anyone to offer a definitive answer for your situation without looking at the language written into your contract.\n\nTechnically, you offer a service, and the contract is for payment for services rendered.  The contract also states that services rendered would be provided under certain conditions and allowances.  (I assume this much from what you've indicated)  \n\nHowever, there is specific language which needs to be used in the contract- language which makes your agreement "legal" and language which covers any possible loopholes which may exist.\n\nAt the minimum, both parties need to be identified and referred to in the same manner throughout the entire document.  Dates and dollar amounts specified, and in some cases written out completely (no numbers, as numbers can get "misread" 1's and 7's sometimes look similar, dependant on handwriting or typeset)  All stipulations must be clearly indicated, and any signatures must be dated, and prefaced with something indicating all parts of the document were read, understood, and accepted as a contract for services rendered.\n\nIt's probably not worth the trouble to pursue this matter.  Have you truly lost a ton of money, or are you trying to get back at the parent?\n\nConsider the children.  If you think them as angels, do you want to put them through a possible court proceeding?
468644
In basic terms\nis when a contract is terminated because of circumstances beyond the contractor's control.  For example, if you payed someone to cook for your party and this person's kitchen is suddenly destroyed, thats a reason 'out of control' that terminates a contract
535804
I think you need to word the question differently to be clear. Union as in jointly/together?\n\nAre you talking about a union contract or a grievance?