Please watch this video before answering\n\nhttp://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon.php#Main
122598
I don't know what to think of that....and I watched the video twice.\n\nVery compelling video with a great soundtrack.
669942
Try this link...enjoy\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2511024690027582322
672912
Keep watching CNN Skippy, they'll give you everything your tiny liberal mind needs to know in convenient thimble-sized servings.  The media is upset because they forced the Intelligence Committee to review the Pentagons findings and sure enough they found some.  Why is anyone surprised?  Where are the industrial centifuges capable of enriching uranium that "disappeared" under the noses of the U.N. Atomic and Weapons inspectors.\n\nWhy don't whiny liberals want to know the truth and why do they get upset when they find out they were wrong?
664717
This video is very compelling evidence that there's a lot more to the events of 9/11 than most people know.  A few of the things in the Loose Change video are inaccurate, but it compiles enough accurate information to lead to further questions.  \n\nTo the people who say things like "this has all been disproven" or "it's just conspiracy theories" you are fooling yourselves.  The famous philospher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) said “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident”.  People will believe any lie either because they want it to be true, or because they fear it is true.  The lie you are believing is that the official story of how the events of 9/11 occurred are true.  When you OBJECTIVELY analysis the scientific evidence -- as a detective or scientist would -- without injecting false patriatism into the equation -- you realize that it is simply physically impossible that things happened as we've been led to believe.\nAnd  as a side note, questioning the events of 9/11 is NOT unpatriotic.  On the contrary, it's about the most patriotic thing you can do.  We have a duty to defend this great nation of ours against ALL threats, foriegn AND DOMESTIC.  And the families of the victims of 9/11 have a right to know the TRUTH of how and why their loved ones died.  In that spirit, I present the following very small bits of information concerning the events of 9/11.\n\nYou can’t collapse a skyscraper with jet fuel.\nMany engineers have come forward and said that there’s no way those buildings fell from fire.  Steel doesn’t weaken until almost 2000 degrees F, and it doesn’t melt until almost 3000 degrees F.  Jet fuel doesn’t burn hot enough to do it.\nThe official NIST report states “The initial jet fuel fires themselves lasted at most a few minutes” and office material fires would burn out within about 20 minutes in a given location. (NIST, 2005; p. 179, emphasis added.)   The final NIST report on the Towers admits:  \n"Of the more than 170 areas examined on 16 perimeter column panels, only three columns had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250ºC… Only two core column specimens had sufficient paint remaining to make such an analysis, and their temperatures did not reach 250 ºC. ... Using metallographic analysis, NIST determined that there was no evidence that any of the samples had reached temperatures above 600 ºC."  (NIST, 2005, pp. 176-177) \nKevin Ryan, the engineer from the company that underwrote the towers, said it was impossible that a jet fuel fire brought the towers down.  The architect who designed the twin towers has repeatedly said that he designed them to take not 1, but 2, massive passenger airliner impacts and not fall.  \nPools of molten steel were found in the basements of the towers (including tower 7) weeks after 9/11.  Steel melts at 2777 degrees F.  Jet fuel burns at only 1577 degrees F.  It is literally impossible for jet fuel fires to get hot enough to melt steel into molten pools.  Something else must have done it.\n\nFirefighters and survivors said repeatedly that bombs were going off throughout the towers, on many different floors. Firefighters gave very specific descriptions of seeing flashes of light and explosions going off on the lower levels.   If you watch the news from that morning, you'll even see Fox news reporting a "4th explosion" going off in tower 1.   For instance, at the start of the collapse of the South Tower a Fox  News anchor reported:   “There is an explosion at the base of the building… white smoke from the bottom… something happened at the base of the building!  Then another explosion.”\nFirefighter Edward Cachia independently reported:  \n“[We] thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came
199632
Arlington, Virginia\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pentagon
287163
This is just step 40032 in our slow but gradual march to an Orwellian 1984 hell.  I'm waiting for the majority of Americans to wake up (they may have already) to this fact that every day this war on terror is costing us our freedoms that we enjoyed just a few short years ago.  You should see the video of the woman getting arrested for having a copy of the Constitution in her car (and a Michener novel, LOL), after being almost sickeningly polite to the officer questioning her.  I just see myself in the same situation having the same thing done, it scares the hell out of me.
661140
Popular Mechanics Article here:\nhttp://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html\nPentagon Site here:\nhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html\nStructural failure report by NIST here:\nhttp://wtc.nist.gov/\n\nA little common sense will get you thinking the right way.  Good luck.
246601
You commented :Could a huge conspiracy like that, which would involve thousands of people, really be kept secret!?\n\nThis should be the biggest evidence AGAINST a conspiracy theory, at least as it applies to a missile or something similar, blowing up the Pentagon instead of the commercial airliner.  The Pentagon is close to several busy traffic routes; these roads were packed with commuters at the time of the crash. There were thousands of people in the office buildings nearby. All of these people became eyewitnesses and if there were any conspiracy, they'd ALL have to have been in on it.  How could it be possible to get every single one of those people to play along?  I just don't get it.\n\nPS--- I was one of the thousands of eyewitnesses and I watched the plane actually hit the Pentagon and even though I've told people my story, they still cling to these conspiracy theories... go figure.
574869
No official report corroborates your claims.  You're really embarrassing yourself.  The use of profanity only shows you lack understanding, intelligence, and logic skills.  That is why you let a novice fiction filmmaker spoon-feed you information contradicting everything you saw on that day.  I am sorry for you.\n\nThe terrorists on flight 77 did not need to take off nor land the plane.  The take-off part had been done for them.  They never planned to land.  So what does it matter if they had trouble with landings?\n\nImpossible turns?  Could it be that the terrorists didn't know what they were doing?  I doubt they planned to make those insane maneuvers.  The first attempt at the pentagon was botched, so they had no choice.  They were planning to die anyway, why wouldn't they attempt an "impossible" maneuver?\n\nLight poles at the pentagon were knocked from their break-away bases (new safety design), unlike the poles the filmmaker references in another accident.  Oh, and ripped out of the ground is not damaged???  The poles did exactly what they were designed to do.\n\nhttp://911myths.com/\nhttp://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html\nhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html\nhttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/05/911_documentary_removed/\nhttp://wtc.nist.gov/\nhttp://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html\n\nNow please shut up.
80079
Watch this:\n\nhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=0aCO_byeEN8
642737
Ok, so most of us agree that the pentagon's statement is bullsh**. I just wanted to make a comment to those who are pissed at the guy who posted this ques. Did you read the whole thing before you answered? He doesn't agree either, dumbasses. He even stated that those people are a disgrace to the civilized world. Stop being so f***ing immature!
32971
still no answers? not an advert, just trying to share info.\ngovernment explained simply,\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=98\nmoney,\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/griffin_stream.html\neducation,\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/taylor_stream.html\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/gatto_stream.html\nww1 wilson,\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=88\n\nhttp://www.philipdru.com\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com\nhttp://thestressblog.com\nhttp://www.antiwar.com\nhttp://www.kaos959.com
619826
no, it isn't. i was at the pentagon that day and it wasn't a plane. where is the tapes in question on loose change?
594796
Son, I was in a BDE HQ during the battle of Falluja and know for a fact that 'banned weapons' were not used - by our side.  In fact those DVDs you mention are hilarious because all they do is demonstrate just how gullible you are.  (Take a class in basic physics or chemistry then watch them and laugh.)\n\nWhy don't you stop mindlessly believing the propaganda your government gives you and face facts?
301226
I'm very weary of the conspiracy theories. As one of the people who watched the plane go into the Pentagon (literally watched it hit), it makes me very annoyed to see how many people think so many other people could be wrong, imaging things, or a part of a conspiracy. Maybe the theory would be credible if no one was around to watch.  But between NYC and DC/Arlington, both in the tail end of rush hour commuter traffic, you'd have to get about 50,000 people to agree to this conspiracy. I find it insulting and I am immediately annoyed by anyone who actually thinks these web sites are reporting the truth.
325679
If anyone can handle the truth, you will have alot of your questions answered from this video, please visit http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=loose+change
114200
You might want to try Military.com. It gives free access to public files at the Pentagon. Most of the info is generic, but if they, as in your friends, have an account you can e-mail them. This is a free site that anyone can join. Good Luck