private sector is an efficient provider of public goods and services sogovernment should refain from production of such goods and services
130662
That is a very involved question and cannot be answered in anything less than a dissertation on economics & government.   There are times when it is more efficient for the government to produce certain public goods, for example security is probably not a good thing to have done privately.  Things like electricity and water might actually cost more if done privately, and other areas with enormous infrastructure costs *can* benefit from government.  With that said, there are just way to many different things to consider, try asking about a particular good.
35064
What you're talking about is public works, which are not a bad idea really, but many (conservatives, mainly) see them as making the welfare problem worse.  The conservative's ideal solution would be to have the people on welfare working for private industry, not the government.  With public works you end up with additional staff, bureaucracy and taxation to pay for it than you do with just cutting a check, which means more bloated government, which is against the conservative doctrine of small government.  (Note this is the traditional definition of conservative.  Many Republicans (cough, Bush, cough) claim to be conservatives while at the same time massively increasing the size of the federal government and spending.)
587956
in most of the sectors it is developing or developed
308347
Government. Pure and simple. Greed is the motive.
379547
That is where the Lezefare policy (privatised freedom) is all about.  In a controlled economy the Government inerfears to stop is the manufacturing of below standard products but in a so called free economy the Government can not interfear into this.  The customers are the better decision makers it is believed.  And we all know the customer awareness in India and the consequences of it. Although we are not in that barbarian society, we are marching towards one.  As on date, we are in betwee, the BIS standards are specified by BIS and these standards are made by expert in the field of that particular products. The products which are upto these standards have been given permission by BIS to print the words "BIS" and its registration number ISI 473 etc.  \n\nNow again it is the customer's option whether to buy a ISI or BIS products or a non-ISI or BIS product.  But do yo know, the Government influenced by these business men is re-thinking on the very existence of this BIS itself considering it as a measure to reduce  extra paper work. This will make the society and business more barbarian and uncivilised with no business ethics.\n\nI agree with you, no products without not as per the standard specified by BIS and with  BIS certificates should be allowed to float in the market.
399691
Government run agencies are not always willing to help the needy. People who know how to scam the system are usually the first ones helped. Private organizations help those who are trying to do things the right way. People helping people is a better way.
57827
Government funded and nonprofit are exempt.
439213
true, i suppose.\nthe word public is open, and the law benefits people who are concerned.
268184
DEFINITELY> GOVERMENT HAS TO TAKE CARE OF ITS CITIZENS
514369
both if private gives u many opportunities for Ur growth,but no job surety govt. gives job stable no growth.now it depends what u want.
144679
Accounting should be neutral - social issues are the playground of politicians.
534397
by the government of A.P
79705
Goverment turning over the operation of operation to a private company. For example, the US president wants to turn over the social security admin to the private market.\nTry Wikipedia for a definition, too, maybe they have a better defination.\nGood luck with the project.
250438
Privatization allows for private companies to own industries instead of the public.  Some people think that this is bad but let me give you an example; The Fishing Industry.  Okay take a group of people seated in a circle and pass around a cloth bag full of chocolate candy kisses.  Tell everyone that they may each take as many as they wish and when the bag gets back to you, you will double the number of candies inside the bag and pass it around again.  I guarantee that the bag won't make it around the circle once before all the candies are gone, each person thinking that everyone else is conserving, so they can take a few extras.  Now give everyone there own bag of candies and tell them to take as many as they want and you'll double whats left.  This time everyone will have candy in their left in their own bag.  This is privatization.  This is an example of the fishing industry, now that some parts are privatized no one over fishes because then their area won't have any left for next year.
421449
We don't need to raise taxes.   The government has more than enough money if it would reduce corruption and inefficiency.    The waste is staggering.
407697
It's because big corporations want it that way. Cheap labor. It used to be that big corporations controlled the government to a large degree. Now they are the government.
664111
laissez-faire, which is a government injunction against interference in free trade.