What is the subject and verb?  What is the function of was in this sentence?
129191
[All I did]\nThe phrase inside the square brackets is the subject of the sentence. It consists of a pronoun, "all," and a relative clause, "(that) I did." Note that the relativizer "that" is optional. In your version of the sentence, it has been omitted.\n\n[was review] \n"Was review" is the verb.  [Was]is an auxiliary verb in the sentence.  "Was" is used with the infinitive of the verb "Review" to express intention, obligation, or future action: "what we covered in class."\n\n"what we covered in class" can be thought of as a noun clause.\n\nI hope this helps!
431842
What do you see?\nsubject--you   (the subject 'does' the verb)\nverb--do see (need the do because of English question formation)\nwhat--direct object--an interrogative pronoun which will stand for whatever is seen.\nThis is clearer if you restate it as a statement with a noun for 'what'.\nYou see the tree. (subject you, verb see, d.o. the tree)
179289
1.  When did you buy your car?\n\nObviously you have a car.  Therefore you must have bought it in the past.  It is therefore considered to be a past action.  For past actions we use the simple past tense.\n(Answer: I bought it in 2004.)\n\n2. I've known her for three months.\n\nWe use the present pefect simple with 'stative' verbs like 'know'.  Stative verbs do not usually have a continuous ('-ing') form.  So, 'I've known her for three months' BUT 'I've been learning to drive for six weeks'.  (Present perfect continuous)\n\nI recommend 'English Grammar in Use' by Raymond Murphy (Cambridge University Press).
13929
HI! I can help! Linking verbs join a noun or pronoun to wirds that describe its state of being.  Linking verbs tell what is or what was, in many cases using some form of the verb to be.  All forms of to be are linking verbs. ( am, is, are, was,were, be being, been.  Other verbs can be ling verbs if they describe a state of being rather than action performed by a noun.  Whenever you can substitue a form of "to be" for the verb in a sentence, that verb is a linking verb.  Here are some examples of words that may be action words or may describe a state of being, depending on the sentence. ( appear, become, feel, grow, keep, look, prove, remain,seen, smell, sound, taste.).  Once again, the classification of a word depends on the way it is used in a sentence.  That's why it is so important to understand the structure of sentences.  You may have heard someone talk about words "in context".  In order to fully understand the meaning of a word, you may need to hear it used in the context of a sentence.  I hope this helps, if you need more let me know. Good luck!
335422
The most reliable way to distinguish "lay" from "lie" is this:\n"Lay" takes an object. \n"Lie" does not take an object. \nWhat does mean for a verb to"take an object?"\nlay -- She laid the book on the table.\nlie -- He plans to lie on the grass all afternoon. ("On the grass" is where, not what, he plans to lie.")\nThe first way to distinguish "lay" and "lie" is to ask, "Does this verb take an object?" -- meaning, does it act upon something?\nIf you "lay the book on the table," then "book" is the object of your action, "lay." What do you lay? The book.\nBut if you lie "on the grass," that does not make "grass" the object of "lie." You do not "lie the grass," you "lie," and "on the grass" is where you lie. What do you lie? Well, nothing. "You" lie.\nTo determine whether a verb takes an object, ask "what?" after the verb, and see if there is a "what."\nThe distinction between "transitive" and "intransitive" helps you learn to distinguish "lay" from "lie."\n"Lay" always takes an object:\n"I lay the book on the table."\n"Lie" never takes an object:\n"I think I'll lie on the bed."\nLie: I lie (down), you lie, he (she or it) lies, we lie, you lie, they lie.\nLay: I lay (something down), you lay, he (she or it) lays, we lay, you lay, they lay.\nThe next reason we have difficulty with these verbs is that many people substitute "lay" for "lie" when they talk. They say:\nIncorrect: "I think I'll lay down for a nap"\nwhen standard English would have us say (or write):\nCorrect: "I think I'll lie down for a nap."\nIt is common to hear the same error in the past tense:\nIncorrect: "I laid down for a nap yesterday."\nwhen standard English would have us say (or write):\nCorrect: "I lay down for a nap yesterday."\nSimilarly, people sometimes say\nIncorrect: "I had laid there for an hour,"\nwhen the correct form is,\nCorrect: "I had lain there for an hour."\nYou have to train yourself to recognize that a few commonly heard (and read) expressions are incorrect.\nLearn when "lay down" is incorrect and replace it with "lie down."\nThe same goes for the past tense: Learn when to replace "laid down" with "lay down" and "have laid down" with "have lain down."\nHere's a chart showing the corrections you may need to learn to make:\nNon-standard (incorrect)\nI'll lay down now.\nHe laid down for a nap yesterday.\nHe was laying there at noon.\nHe has laid there all afternoon. \n\nStandard (correct)\nI'll lie down now.\nHe lay down for a nap yesterday.\nHe was lying there at noon.\nHe has lain there all afternoon.
602252
PLEASE clarify. Why do you need an underline? Is this a worksheet? What is the question? Are you looking for the subject or predicate? The subject is band, the predicate is DECIDED TO PLAY THE CONCERT.
400704
It depends on which is the "subject", and which is the "predicate". "With" would presume association, whilst "By" would suggest Participation.
518450
BOOK is the subject. IS is the verb. THIS is an adjective. WHY is an adverb. UNDER MY DESK is a prepositional phrase.\n\nunderstood (YOU) is the subject. GO is the verb. TO THE BACK and OF THE LINE are prepositional phrases.\n\n:)
242870
a verb is an action word
154278
Its a noun or a verb, transitive verb or intransitive verb, depending on context.
60825
Here's my sentence: "Me" is an objective case pronoun.\n\nAlso, you spelled "grammar" incorrectly.
207396
C. Sandy washed and ironed her clothes\n\nwashed and ironed her clothes is the predicate and the "and" make it compound
74459
It's a shame the asker didn't include more of the surrounding text from this article so it could be analyzed more closely.  \n\nAnyhow, grammarians will concur that the structure:  \n\n"...active surveillance and robust peer intervention among high-risk groups such as female sex workers had had an impact in the South..." ,\n\nIS, technically, correct.  Sacramento Dweller was correct in identifying this seemingly awkward grammatical structure as a matter of tense.  Sentences utilizing this particular structure generally fall under the category of "Conditional Sentences."  Sentences featuring the 'had had' syntax are classified as "The Third Conditional," or "Conditional Type Three," and can generally be diagnosed by analyzing them for similarities with following structural formulae:\n\n(The Type 3 Conditional / Third Conditional Formula:)\n\n" IF + <insert past perfect tense verb> + <insert perfect conditional tense verb> = RESULT OF SUPPOSED CONDITIONS.*\n\n*~NOTE:  RESULT(S) of the supposed conditions usually resemble one of the following two structures, depending on when events occurred:  \n\n(1.) Result:  <insert simple present or past tense verb to express an obvious, or predictable fact / outcome>\n\n(2.) Result:  <insert modal verb  + simple present or past tense verb to express a known fact / outcome >\n\nEXAMPLE #1:  "If you had had proper training as an assassin, we would not be in this situation..."\n\nEXAMPLE #2:  "If I'd had proper training as an assassin, you probably wouldn't be here to complain."\n\n(Notice how in EXAMPLE #2, the contractions 'I'd' is used instead of saying, 'I had had' to illustrate the terms of the condition being discussed, though still allowing the reader to ascertain and understand the time-frame and sequence in which events occcurred?)\n\nRules for proper usage of the "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure state that the structures are 'to be used when talking about unreal, or "hypothetical" situations occurring in the past.'  That means, the related events DID NOT 'ACTUALLY' HAPPEN in the past.  Sentences utilizing this structure are almost always phrased to reckon, "If circumstances were different, what could / would have this been like?"  \n\nThe expression of time / tense in this [third] variety of conditional sentence structure IS identified as the past, and indicates that an action was completed "in" the past.  The condition and / or result, therefore, cannot logically be fulfilled because the action in the "IF" clause never actually happened.  Action in "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure is almost ALWAYS characterized by the quality of being absurd, and impossible to achieve.\n\nTense and Terminology?\n\n-Simple Present Tense:  Expresses a fact, habit/routine, or ability.\n\n-Simple Past:  Implies that the action happened before and is not happening anymore.\n\n-Past Perfect (Pluperfect) Tense:  Relates that an action or event ended prior to another action or event.\n\n-Present Perfect (Continuous) [Past-composite] Tense:  Indicates either events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Perfect (Conditional) Tense: Relates varying degrees of certianty or uncertainty about events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Modal Verbs:  incorporated with other verbs to illustrate the notion of possibility, impossability, necessity or other degree of probability.
421251
you, yourself, one.\n\n"you" is the subject pronoun, and "yourself" is a reflexive pronoun. And "one" is an indefinite pronoun. "Children" is not a pronoun, it's a noun. And pronouns replace nouns.
249342
The simple predicate is "finished."  \n\nHere is the whole sentence:\n\nThe  men finished the game in    a   short time.\nadj  sub verb     adj d.o. prep adj  adj   obj of prep
352182
It is not a sentence...\n\nBeneath the noted universal concerns there lies a distinctive world view.\n\n Or better yet use a semi colon after the word preceeding but ..then replacing it with however and a comma...like this \n\n" ; however, beneath these universal concerns there lies a distinctive worldview."
366034
This is not a sentence it is a phrase,  what about the preparatory work?  there is no verb, just a subject Prepartory work and a clause that describes the term.  What they are talking about is thinking that is done before you do a job or solve a problem in which you think about what you need to do and all the things that affect it.