Please help me simplify this equaltion...thanks bunches and bunches.
133880
the first part is the same as 8+(14-20)x = 8-6x\nthe second part is the same as 5+2x-2 = 3+2x
534535
1. 180\n2. adjacent\n3. 90
489569
n^2 - 7n - 2\n         *   4n - 5                  Multiply term by term\n----------------\n          -5n^2 + 35n + 10\n4n^3 - 28n^2 - 8n               add these now\n--------------------------------\n4n^3 - 33n^2 + 27n + 10\n\n\n\nOK... it took out the extra spaces so my numbers don't line up anymore :p
114811
1 + 49; 2 + 48; etc. Just match the next highest with the next lowest.
168051
========\n\nApparently purity, calculation or measurement errors have been there.\n\nYou repeated the thrice from the same solution to get an average.\n\nTry another solution.
332489
Oh, come on, it doesn't get any easier than this!\n\nSnO2 + 2H2 --> Sn + 2H2O\n\nAbove is balanced. 1 Sn on both sides, 2 O on both sides and 4 H on both sides.\nYou need to work a little harder on these yourself.
482020
You need to give some directions.  What is the problem asking you to do?\nNote: The person below is incorrect.  (4+3x)^5 does NOT equal\n4^5 + (3x)^5
49813
No idea here too... what i know is that it could be simplified to 34x + 40. Dunno about the blank (____)
394040
the expression is being cut off.\nPlease break the expression over multiple lines, \nand I'll try to help
456510
It's in its lowest terms.\nIt can't be simplified.
516827
-8t+tw-2w+4t\n=-8t+4t+tw-2w\n=4t+tw-2w
58039
two answers +3 and -3
435671
OK,as the first one is already done,I am doing the rest for you\n4(2x-6)=x+2 =>8x-24=x+2  =>8x-x=2+24  =>7x=26  =>x=26/3=8 2/3  (3) 2(x+5)+1=3(x-1)+4   =>2x+10+1=3x-3+4 =>2x-3x=-3+4-10-1  => -x=-4  =>x=1  (5)x+6=4(4x-1)   =>x+6=16x-4  =>x-16x=-4-6  => -15x=-10  =>x=-10/-15=2/3 [after reducing]
362110
you gotta get it to two sets of parentheses, i don't remember exactly how to do it, but i know it should look like (x+1)(x+1) that's not the right answer, but i kinda remember doing this in school
146554
hahahah that doesn't make sense in order for two sides of an equation to be equal the numerical value of each side must be the same.  Whats with all the equals signs!
46865
Kerplode is right - but that's kind of complicated.  Basically you solve both in exactly the same way.  The only difference is that instead of an = you have an > or <.  \n\nIt just looks different, there really is no difference in how you solve them.
613151
divide. multiply. subtract. bring down