What's the differences between them?Anybody knows?
137045
the indy cars runs faster than a formula 1 car not only because an indy racing circuit is oval and lacks turns and corners,the new regulations introduced in formula 1 are making the cars slower.\nthere are many difference between an f1 car and indy car.\nsay for example an f1 car runs on petrol which is similar to road cars but the indy cars runs on methanol.if we have a closer look at aerodynamics of the two cars many differences can be found.\nthe indy rules and regulations are entirely different from formula1.\nformula 1 is a world sport but indy racing is only popular in some parts of the world.
253737
No they are entirely different
380724
There is no difference... it's the perception.\nThey're exactly the same models made by Dell, HP, IBM, Compaq, etc.  Some come packaged with software that is for business applications (MS-Office, etc.), and have more-lucrative warranties for business people, but they are all made to the same specifications.
177469
no there is no difference.  your body goes back to normal.  so please do not worry.
360262
It would really be greatly helpful if you would post links so that we don't have to go looking for each one individually, but I can basically tell you that there is little difference between most of them, they all use the 7900GS, so any differences would be minimal.
196778
hello.. just grabbed my dusty old science notebook for you..\nthere are 4 differences i have here..\n1. plant cells have cell wall while animal cells don't.\n2. plant cells have plastids while animal cells don't.\n3. plant cells have large and many vacuoles.\n4. animal cells have centrioles while plant cells don't.\n\nhope that helps.. :)
40979
there is no 'the' difference.\n\nthey are so dis-similar, one could spend a number of years cateloggin their differences.....\n\nI want a million dollars !      it's good to want.\n\nwe both have a similar chance of getting what we want, via this forum.\n\nluck !\n\n\ndude...those links will just be defining them, not listing their differences....\n\nOMG...Greeney that's wrong.\n\nDOS was around LONG before there was windows.  IT DOES NOT need windows to operate. It CAN run under windows, BUT windows 1,2, and 3 needed DOS under THEM to run.\nLOL
104566
For what you are doing, there is no practical difference.\n\nThere are differences in terms of complex database activities, such as using triggers; changing server variables on the database server; error handling; the nature of the way data is returned, and other very complex, vary narrow semantics.
310637
There isn't any difference.  Was that in any doubt? \n\nWhat that has to do with immigration, I don't know.
291657
Its just an abbreviation. \nIts the same thing. \n\nJust our lazy culture trying to make things simple...
625198
What makes the difference?
34344
There is no difference between them, they are diffrent names for the same animal.\n_____\n\n>>>>>>First, is there such thing as a panther,\n>>>>> separate and distinct from a black leopard?\n\nNo. \n\nLet's set the wayback machine for 500BC, the early Roman Empire. At that time lions and leopards was still quite widespread in Egypt and Libya and was not uncommonly seen in Rome as a guard animal or exotic pet.\n\nBut travellers in those days also told stories of exotic and remarkable beasts like chimaeras, unicorns and rocs. And one of the exotic animals they told stories about was a large spotted cat called a pardus or pantherus. And just like the Rocs and unicorns the parda/panthera never existed. It was entirely made up. It had all sorts of remarkable traits. It could turn invisible. An adult pardus was at least as big as a lion but could shrink down to mimic a housecat so it get into houses and eat people in their sleep. A pardus could breath out a sweet fragrance that would cause its prey to become helpless and could even cause a human who breathed it to spend his life luting other humans off the road to be devoured by the pard.\n\nAnother common property of the Parda/Panthera is that they were all either male or female, and they could only reproduce by breeding with other animals. They mostly reproduced with lions (leo in Latin), giving rise to the hybrid animal know as leo pardus. A name the Romans later contracted to leopard. Early Romans seem to have genuinely believed that the leopard was not a species in its own right but a hybrid of a lion and the mythical panthera/parda.\n\nWhich is why we have all this confusion with the names. Panther applied to a fictitious big cat of unknown character, and a leopard was the offspring of a panther. Over time the names became every more confused and acquired subtly different meaning in the various European languages. \n\nBut in modern English the panther is just a leopard with black hair. They most commonly arise as individuals in a litter of otherwise perfectly normal leopards. Two spotted leopards will just produce black panthers occasionally. And two black panthers that breed will produce mostly spotted young. \n\nThe black hair is just a genetic quirk, it is exactly like red hair in humans. Just as two brown haired people can throw a red haired child, so two spotted leopards can throw black panther. \n\n>>>>Also, why would a melanistic version of a jaguar not be called a black jaguar instead of a black leopard?\n\nBecause South American countries speak Spanish or Portugese, not English. The word 'leopard' has a subtly different meaning in those languages. It is closer to the original Latin meaning of 'exotic big cat'. A black jaguar is rare enough to qualify as a leopard.\n\n>>>>>.... leopards are in Africa\n\nLeopards are the most widespread big cat on the planet. They are found in Africa, but they are also found through the middle east, into the Indian subcontinent and China and through South East Asia all the way to Java. They used to be common.\n\n>>> Makes no sense...\n\nIt makes no sense biologically. It makes perfect sense etymologically. \n\nJust like it makes perfect sense that Americans call a crocodilian alligator (literally meaning 'a lizard') when they have no close biological affinity to lizards. That could really confuse a Spanish speaker. But if you trace the etymology of the word it makes perfect sense.\n\nWords change there meaning over time, and when they hop between languages they often change meaning in very confusing ways.
292872
None is better than the other. It's about the major you fit in. I'm not sure what specific technical background you have. Sometimes one doesn't have to choose which one you want, because one only fulfills the requirements for either, not both.
419194
there is massive difference, eg lens, graphics card, storage etc etc.. \nhttp://www.gamesfirst.com/articles/xbox-ps2/xbox_vs_playstation_2.htm\nthis is a good article to read.
124952
I have never heard of either one of them.  Sorry and good luck!
117854
There should be no difference, as they are basically the same program just updated, try re installing the drivers for the items or checking for updated drivers on the net
115433
There's no difference - both are inter-changeable.  Now you have also Tablet PC's - some of those open like laptops but the screen swivels around and then closes with the screen facing out.  You use a plastic pen-like stylus to 'handwrite' on the screen while it digitizes your writing.