hi\n\ndoes any one know of any pictures of space or pictures or any thing that space is like or pictures of the astronauts in space or pictures of the planets of close or the milky way
135972
http://images.google.com/images?q=astronauts&hl=en&btnG=Search+Images\nhttp://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&q=milky+way&btnG=Search\nhttp://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&q=space&btnG=Search\nhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Space+exploration&btnG=Google+Search
590716
QUOTE-----"The photo must be by telescope from the Earth to the moon! If no one can find any recent photos then the moon landings are a massive hoax!"\n\nTo remind u and other readers...we CAN'T see the lunar rover or whatsoever using our telescope on earth.No matter how BIG the telescope is, we still CAN'T see it because of atmospheric blurring.\n\nEven HUBBLE can't see it...because that landing site (flag and all that) is so SMALL.... and MOON is MOVING so fast.\n\nIt's just like trying to see a COIN when you are travelling with an AEROPLANE high in the SKY\n\nDID U GET IT? OR U NEED ME TO REPEAT IT AGAIN?
110127
There are quite a few pictures if you do a google search for Columbia.  It is unfortunate that there was a space shuttle and university by the same name, so there are mixed results.  Speaking as an American, I agree with you that most Americans lack proper respect for and knowledge of Columbia and South America as a whole.
588805
NO!\n\nIN THE HEAVENS: ABOVE OUR HEADS....\nIN SPACE......\n\nOUTSIDE OF THE EARTH'S ATMOSPHERE\n\nAMONGST THE PLANETS\n\n THERE IS ABSOLUTE ORDER\n\nHERE ON EARTH.....\nJUST PICK UP THE LOCAL PAPER....WATCH THE LOCAL NEWS CHANNELS.....
19213
it think it is a hoax... "The astronauts have kept out of the public eye", something happend. they were on their way to the moon, but i don't believe they have been on it! if you look around, read about it, it will become more clear. the pictures they have made don't match the actual event... i think they have been made in a hollywood studio. there has been pictures with some major mistakes, like the shadowing, footprints etc. everybody got his own opinion, and this is mine: it's a hoax.
660875
Yes there is a relation between nuclear and space, infact space affects everything... The advancements we can really explain here in small space. Just go thru google search and find out.
82611
I think that this site is really great since it is so visual:\nhttp://stardate.org/nightsky/moon/
576942
Off course scienists investigate this. Our galaxy is pretty flat around where we are - only 3,000 light years wide. It gets thicker then that in the center -16,000 light years but that's still pretty thin compare to it's length - about 100,000 light years across. "above" and "below" us are other stars, possibly with other planets. Basically the same things that are "in front" and "behind" us across the length of the galactic disk. \nOn a very dark night you'll be able to see a bright band across the night sky - that's the Milky Way. You'll then be looking towards the galactic center. The pictures we recive from satelites and telescope come from different directions.\nAs for a 3D model of the universe there is such a project in progress but it deals with objects on a much larger scale - galaxy clusters, superclusters, walls and fillaments.
97332
Hey Bud,\n\nCheck out http://www.desktopmachine.com/ some nice high quality pics there.  One of the best I have found so far anyways.
34206
The pictures you see that are released by nasa or whoever are doctored. If you were out in space you would basically see what you see now. There are some differences in colors of stars, for example bettleguise ( forgive my horrible spelling) is a red giant and is a red colored star. However this really isn't what were talking about here. When you see nebulae and such in those pictures they are quite pretty, blue, red, all sorts of stuff going on there. In the truth of the matter if you could actually "look" through the hubble it would be just plain ole grey's and white's. Sometimes a picture is taken in several different wavelenghts and has each wavelength given as a different color. This is really not as common as some people think. I assure you that those amazing pictures that are full of color were processed to look amazing and not becasue they have these incredible colors themselves.\n\nOh one last thing, if you were up in space and you got a look at the sun it would appear bright white and not the yellow that we are used to here on the ground- the atmosphere gives it the color
283314
Yes, there are pictures.\n\nThe Russians sent up the first unmanned ships in the 1960s, took pictures and named most of the features.  The US astronaughts in the Apollo missions saw them and took pictures also.
576527
such a waste of space if we were alone.\n\n if you could just imagine yourself looking on our milky way from another outside.. \n\nhow infitestimally small we truly are... we are nothing but dust on a small rock revolving a small star..
574668
Try Encarta on MSN.COM and type "space exploration... it gives a good definition\n\nheres the link:\n\nhttp://encarta.msn.com/encnet/refpages/RefArticle.aspx?refid=761556756
303002
Well I like it myself!!\nIf your interested in astronomy etc. I hope you like the following site.\n\nhttp://space.com
138343
we have a hubble telescope. its actually a giant satellite that orbits in space. takes pictures. and sends them to computers on earth! neato!\n\nbut an intersting thing is, the pictures we get of other galaxies are what they looked like millions of years ago! thats because it takes millions of years for light to travel from THAT galaxy to THIS galaxy. :)
600762
There are actual images of the entire galaxy, but from our position within the disk, it looks a lot like an edge on thin disk with a galactic bulge.  The earliest image of our galaxy that I know of was assembled from IRAS data.  The DIRBE experiment aboard COBE also produces a some nice ones (COBE was a mission to explore the microwave background radiation left over from the big bang.  DIRBE was aboard that spacecraft to characterize the diffuse infrared foreground, namely our galaxy, so its contribution could be removed from the microwave measurements).\n\nDIRBEs shorter wavelength infrared channels trace the stars in the galaxy nicely so you can see the bulge:http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap000130.html\n\nThe longer wavelength channels are more sensitive to dust:http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap000517.html\n\nNote that these are all sky images probably using a Molleweide projection.  The centers look towards the center of the galaxy, but the edges look directly out (away) from the center.  This is a "wraparound" view.
377591
Kentrell, I want you to look at this Nova website, and to watch these videos, OK?  I did, and was quite impressed with them.  they use infrared X-ray telescopes to look to the center of our Milky Way galaxy, with very clear images!!\n\nhttp://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blackhole/program.html\n\nI believe you will like these, will learn from them!