There is a 70 story side of Canary Worff missing and the whole tower may collapse like the world trade centre.
132633
That would be Canary Wharf, right?  No, the damage was caused by a rogue herd of pigs that flew into it.
593281
The Destruction of the World Trade Center:\nWhy the Official Account Cannot Be True\nDavid Ray Griffin\nAuthorized Version (with references & notes)\n\n \n\n \n\nIn The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11 (2004), I summarized dozens of facts and reports that cast doubt on the official story about 9/11. Then in The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (2005a), I discussed the way these various facts and reports were treated by the 9/11 Commission, namely, by distorting or simply omitting them. I have also taken this big-picture approach, with its cumulative argument, in my previous essays and lectures on 9/11 (Griffin, 2005b and 2005d).[1] This approach, which shows every aspect of the official story to be problematic, provides the most effective challenge to the official story.\n\n     But this way of presenting the evidence has one great limitation, especially when used in lectures and essays: It means that the treatment of every particular issue must be quite brief, hence superficial. People can thereby be led to suspect that a more thorough treatment of any particular issue might show the official story to be plausible after all.\n\n     In the present essay, I focus on one question: why the Twin Towers and building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed. One advantage of this focus, besides the fact that it allows us to go into considerable detail, is that the destruction of the World Trade Center provides one of the best windows into the truth about 9/11. Another advantage of this focus is that it will allow us to look at revelations contained in the 9/11 oral histories, which were recorded by the New York Fire Department shortly after 9/11 but released to the public only in August of 2005.\n\nI will begin with the question of why the Twin Towers collapsed, then raise the same question about building 7.\n\n \n\n \n\n1. The Collapse of the Twin Towers\n\n \n\nShortly after 9/11, President Bush advised people not to tolerate “outrageous conspiracy theories about the attacks of 11 September” (Bush, 2001).[2] Philip Zelikow, who directed the work of the 9/11 Commission, has likewise warned against “outrageous conspiracy theories” (Hansen, 2005). What do these men mean by this expression? They cannot mean that we should reject all conspiracy theories about 9/11, because the government’s own account is a conspiracy theory, with the conspirators all being members of al-Qaeda. They mean only that we should reject outrageous theories.\n\nBut what distinguishes an outrageous theory from a non-outrageous one? This is one of the central questions in the philosophy of science. When confronted by rival theories---let’s say Neo-Darwinian Evolution and Intelligent Design---scientists and philosophers of science ask which theory is better and why. The mark of a good theory is that it can explain, in a coherent way, all or at least most of the relevant facts and is not contradicted by any of them. A bad theory is one that is contradicted by some of the relevant facts. An outrageous theory would be one that is contradicted by virtually all the relevant facts.\n\n     With this definition in mind, let us look at the official theory about the Twin Towers, which says that they collapsed because of the combined effect of the impact of the airplanes and the resulting fires. The report put out by FEMA said: “The structural damage sustained by each tower from the impact, combined with the ensuing fires, resulted in the total collapse of each building” (FEMA, 2002).[3] This theory clearly belongs in the category of outrageous theories, because is it is contradicted by virtually all the relevant facts. Although this statement may seem extreme, I will explain why it is not.\n\n \n\nNo Prior Collapse Induced by Fire\n\nThe official theory is rendered implausible by two major problems. The first is the simple fact that fire has never---prior to or after 9/11---caused steel-frame high
423234
The Civil Engineering Portal - News - WTC \nEarly tests on steel beams from the World Trade Center \nThis site may be helpful.
638601
Think for at least 30 seconds before you think this is crazy.\n\n1. Jet fuel does NOT burn hot enough to melt steel. Weaken it, yes, but how weak does steel have to be to allow a building to collapse @ NEAR FREEFALL velocity? you have to REMOVE the supprts or else the rummle will slow down as it nears the bottom.\n2. Thermite with added sulfur DOES. Commonly used in Military. \n3. A great deal of wreckage was heavily (Sulfidated?).\nSome steel was EVAPORATED. that's way too fucking hot for jet fuel.\n4. Have you seen the picture of the woman standing IN the   \n     PLANE HOLE? Seems really hot to me.\n5. Molten steel leaked out one of the buildings and onto the street.\n6. Yellow Molten metal was pulled out of the wreckage WEEKS  \n    later. Not days. Under WTC 1,2 &7!!! Jet fuel does NOT burn hot enough to do this.\n      Doesn't yellow mean it can't be aluminum from the planes?\n7. WTC 7 collapsed 7+ hrs after 1&2. It was not hit by a plane.\n8. The DOD, CIA, and i believe FBI had offices in WTC 7.\n         You hopefully must have clearence to get in to the sensitive \n     parts of the building necessary to bring it down w/explosives. \n     Either security sucked, or it was an INSIDE Job maybe a \n    rouge element in DOD,CIA or FBI.\n9. PNAC (Project For A New American Century) stated it's         \ndesire for an increasingly militarized USA, but stated that they needed a "New Pearl Harbor" to motivate people towards this militarization. 9/11 was directly compared to pearl harbor by every major media outlet.\n10. Which sitting vice presidetn was a member of PNAC?\n11. Wich company formerly headed by Cheyney has profited heavily form Gov't contracts as a result of 9/11, Afganistan,& Iraq\n12. Why were FBI confiscating cameras of people filming 9/11. For NATIONAL SECURITY?  That's like beating the cat after the dog poops on the floor. Seems like they already had a national security problem.\n13. Where was the huge rolls royce engine @ the pentagon?\n       A rolls royce spokesman, when asked about the little engine in the photos, could not identify it as ANY RR engine he had ever seen.\n14. Of course planes did hit the WTC 1&2, but that was to provide a laman's reason as to why they fell.\n15. If 2500 soldiers & who knows how many Iraqis are OK to send to their death, why not 3000 civilians? What is the difference? \nFor those who would call me "UnAmerican for even thinking this nonsense", it is YOUR DUTY to ask questions of YOUR EMPLOYEES when something bad happens. By employees, I mean politicians. If you accept every one of their explanations, they will lie with impunity. Hasn't history PROVEN this? If you do not hold employees responsible for their actions, you are not a good BOSS.
662515
It is completely coincidental and has nothing to do with whether the country is developed or not. Unfortunately, when their buildings aren't as well designed as they are in so-called First World nations, there are more deaths due to building collapses, etc, and they may not have the infrastructure in place to assist in rescue and medically treat the injured when these disasters happen.
326871
Lots of funny answers here!\nGail said that “The FBI found one of the hijackers passports in the rubble of the World Trade Centre” \nHow can u find a passport in that tons of rubble unless it was placed there to be found!\nAnd father Chuck wants to kick some butts.. be good father!\nEnough of this crab stuff and you all need to dig for the truth by yourselves and use your own brains... not rely on the republicans.\nStart at:http://www.loosechange911.com/ \n911 was bigger that a cave man –bin laden- or bunch of guys to orchestrate and implement.\n\n-----\nhere are more sites for u all:\nhttp://www.total911.info/\nhttp://www.stopthelie.com/911.html (download the clips)\nhttp://www.letsroll911.org/\nhttp://valis.cjb.cc/\nhttp://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.htm\nhttp://www.911proof.com/\n\nProfessional Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7\nhttp://www.prisonplanet.com/011904wtc7.html\n\nFor those who doubt "Government Conspiracies."\nhttp://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1
615693
I believe you and I saw your google video.  Those buildings should have not come down that way.  Those buildings came down like a demolition crew was there.  It came down too straight.  That takes years of training. Where did that video go.  I was trying to send it to a few people and even my copy of the web address changed.  What's Up With THAT?
335704
Did you know Babylon is the Great city which is  New York and the "whore of Babylon" is the statue of Liberty. When it state babylon "IS FALLEN, IS FALLEN" THATS THE WTC "IS FALLEN TWICE IS BECAUSE BOTH TOWERS OF BABYLON WERE COMING DOWN. Just like Babylon of old the tower of the world power fell. then it goes on to say that a angel took a stone and cast it in the sea and that Great city was seen no more.\n\nAnd no the want close the borders.
64368
It could crack or bust.
101061
I think there was more to the high-jacking than we have been told. Why I do not know...There has been a lot of talk about the way the twin towers fell. \nThank you for sending this I have enjoyed.
596909
From the Unites States web site::\n\nhttp://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archive/2005/Jan/14-260933.html\n\n""A total of 2,071 occupants of the World Trade Center died on September 11, among the 2,749 victims of the WTC attacks. \n\nAccording to an article in the October 11, 2001, Wall Street Journal, roughly 1,700 people had listed the religion of a person missing in the WTC attacks; approximately 10% were Jewish. \n\nA later article, in the September 5, 2002, Jewish Week, states, "based on the list of names, biographical information compiled by The New York Times, and information from records at the Medical Examiner's Office, there were at least 400 victims either confirmed or strongly believed to be Jewish." \n\nThis would be approximately 15% of the total victims of the WTC attacks. \n\nA partial list of 390 Cantor Fitzgerald employees who died (out of 658 in the company) lists 49 Jewish memorial services, which is between 12% and 13%.\n\nThis 10-15% estimate of Jewish fatalities tracks closely with the percentage of Jews living in the New York area.""\n\nHOWEVER, the antisemites among us wont ever believe this truth, and the ones on and off the internet who keep the lie going that the Jews were forewarned, are usually tied to the Arabs. \n\nhttp://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archive/2005/Jan/14-260933.html
485200
Sorry to hear about your loss.  I'm glad that you are prepared to listen to our opinons on the matter.  If enough people research it, maybe we can stop the bloody bath that is taking place in Iraq, in the name of defending our country.\n\nMost all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny. \n\nFAKE CONFESSION\nThe official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.\nhttp://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg\n\nEVIDENCE\nThere are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.\nhttp://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM\n\nHere is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=\n\nMolten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid.\nhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite\n\nA chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.\nhttp://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml\n\nCONFESSION \nWe also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329\n\nTESTIMONY\nThere is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole."\nhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=\n\nMOTIVE\nThe New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.\nhttp://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf\n\nOPPORTUNITY\nWitnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.\nSee "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA
631475
There is NO DOUBT in my mind that the US government was behind it! Who benefited MOST from it. Bush got his war, the "Military Industrial Complex" is making hundreds of BILLIONS, Osama got away with it and is a martar to his followers. \n\nSome people will never believe no matter what the facts show. The same kinds of tactics have been used for hundreds of years. The German people didn't believe it in the 1930s & 40s either, and many still don't. But it happened.\n\nCalling people "conspiracy nuts" for entertaining the idea of OUR government being corrupt, doesn't change the fact that it ALWAYS has been. Some folks just refuse to consider such things. \n\nDoubters explain this: \n\nHow is it that burning jet fuel does NOT burn hot enough to melt steel, yet that is the "Official" explaination for the collapses of all 3 WTC buildings?\n\nWhy did the towers fall STRAIGHT DOWN? Physics would dictate that if the top was too heavy for the damaged area, it would have fallen to one side. \n\nWhy were police and firemen quoted as saying they witnessed multiple explosions in several locations (including in the basement) many far from the impact area. One so large it was measured on a reichter scale nearly 100 miles away.\n\nWhy did WTC building 7 go down? It was not hit and sustained very little damage from a fire in a small area of one floor.\n\nWhy did the owner of the buildings tell the FDNY to "pull" the building? It takes weeks to prep a building for demolition, yet they had it wired with explosives and leveled by 8 pm on september 11th.\n\nThese are the ONLY modern high rise building IN HISTORY to be brought down by fire!\n\nSo before discounting it offhand, at least try to answer the questions being raised.
284291
His plans just slapped him in the face. Being that he didnt see the news, he doesnt know his building just crumbled. And he is out cheating on his wife. He definatley had that coming.
607217
I'm guessing that depends on how far away you are when it goes BOOM!  Hey, try asking the guy that was standing next to al-Zarqawi!
661381
I can't wait for it to finish building...in like a few more years! Hopefully they stop all the fighting and start building it. It'll be a proud moment for all New Yorkers to see another building rise from the ashes of the World Trade Center.
278501
What will happen in the future is anyone's guess. My guess is there will be a lot of panic, much like there was back in 1999.