What are the standards for attack?
119067
The US Department of Defense officially defines ROE as:\n\n"Directives issued by competent military authority which delineate the circumstances and limitations under which United States forces will initiate and/or continue combat engagement with other forces encountered." [1] \n\nThe ROE deal with four issues [2]:\n\nWhen military force may be used, \nWhere military force may be used, \nAgainst whom force should be used in the circumstances described above, and \nHow military force should be used to achieve the desired ends. \nThe ROE take two forms: Actions a soldier may take without consulting a higher authority, unless explicitly forbidden (sometimes called 'command by negation') and second, actions that may only be taken if explicitly ordered by a higher authority (sometimes called 'positive command').\n\nIn addition to a typically large set of standing orders, military personnel will be given additional rules of engagement before performing any mission or military operation. These can cover circumstances such as how to retaliate after an attack, how to treat captured targets, which territories the soldier is bound to fight into, and how the force should be used during the operation.\n\nThe ROE are extremely important:\n\nThey provide a consistent, understandable and repeatable standard on how forces act. Typically they are carefully thought out in detail well in advance of an engagement and may cover a number of scenarios, with different rules for each. \nThey assist in the synchronization of political-diplomatic and military components of a strategy by allowing political commanders to better understand, forecast and tailor the actions of a force. \n\nThe first rule of engagement for United States military forces is always the right to use force in self-defense.\n\nIn any engagement, the ROE need to balance two competing goals: The need to use force effectively to accomplish the mission objectives and the need to avoid unnecessary force. This creates room for two types of error:\n\nExcessively tight ROE can constrain a commander from performing his mission effectively, called a Type I error. It is typical for the political leadership to constrain the actions of military commanders. This is often a source of tension between the political leaders, who are trying to accomplish a different objective than the military commanders, who are trying make the most effective use of their forces. Sagan [2] provides an excellent discussion of this topic. The UN Peacekeeper's ROE (see UNAMIR) during the Rwandan Genocide is a tragic example of too restrictive ROE. \nExcessively loose ROE can facilitate the escalation of a conflict which, while being tactically effective, negates the political objectives that the use of force was meant to achieve. This is a Type II or 'escalatory' error and an example of it may be the accidental killing of Jean de Menezes on July 22, 2005.
206990
You can search for International Standards for Auditing.\nSome sites for your ready reference.\n\nhttp://www.ifac.org/Guidance\nhttp://www.theiia.org/index.cfm?doc_id=124&bhcp=1\nhttp://www.iasplus.com/ifac/iaasb.htm
113474
Don't be a prude . . . but the decision is yours . . . in yahoo . . . there is usually a local abuse button.\n\nMeanwhile, can you add them as a link with your additional information . . . I want to take a look . . .
271479
Fine. Don't defend yourself, it's not necessary. People are always going to slam you because that's the way it is. Don't let it get to you.
202460
The validation options are:\n\n1.None. \n2.Valid chars validation. \n3.Invalid chars validation. \n4.Letters validation. \n5.Numbers validation. \n6.MaskEdit. \n7.Regular expression validation (E-mail, IP, URL, ZIP, Fecha and Custom). \n8.Using the code\n\nTry the following link for more info.
182763
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/about_legislation.htm\n\nhttp://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/standardization/harmstds/reflist.html
650318
http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/issues/violence/violence.htm
429921
Hold ALT and Type 0134.\n\n† Like this right???  †
39097
If you right -click on the module, you want to protect, you get acess to the property of this module. \nThere is a register, where you can protect your module with a password.
472769
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3961.txt\n\n i dont really  know about it but what the hellthats everything i found
210935
are you asking for a hit list for  cyber terrorism or why people do it? May want to look at the article below,\n\nCyber attacks could be used certainly in conjunction with some other type of attack, to disrupt emergency response capabilities.\n\nA lot of work is done over the Internet which any attack on the Internet infrastructure might disrupt
546633
Yes.  Filtering the single quote will fend off a quoted attack, but not a direct attack.  Consider a query string dynamically assembled that looks like \n\n"SELECT CompanyName FROM Shippers Where OrderNum = " &  myVar &  ";"\n\nFirst problem -- what if you haven't trapped against wild cards?\n\nSecond problem -- what if the input field from your web form is not validated (and I don't mean client-side validation -- hacker will just create their own html forms page to hack your site, sans validation!)\n\nOn your form, if I enter the following into the following field bound to myVar: "* UNION ALL SELECT CompanyName FROM Customers WHERE 1=1" you are in trouble (note that the quotes here are for your benefit -- I wouldn't type double or single quotes into the input field.\n\nSELECT CompanyName FROM Shippers WHERE OrderNum = * UNION ALL SELECT CompanyName FROM Customers WHERE 1=1.\n\nHere's a great paper on this subject: http://www.spidynamics.com/papers/SQLInjectionWhitePaper.pdf#search='sql%20injection'
541581
You' need to go to a site about defeating security systems. Defeating security systems may be illegal and dangerous.
342235
NO VIOLENCE IN THIS FORUM\n\n\nLET ME REMIND U OF THE RULES:\n\n1) NO RACISM\n2) DO NOT TALK BOUT SOMEONE'S PERSONAL LIFE\n3) DO NOT GIVE OUT PERSONAL DETAILS\n4) DO NOT REPORT JUS COZ U HATE DAT PERSON\n5) NO VIOLENCE!!!!
554493
Local police have the first say in dictating everything. Rule of thumb is be subordinate to official demands by first responders.Hold these people accountable for they're actions at all costs.Track they're actions and reactions up the chain of command to hold them liable. Then you might have a legitamate claim if you've been harmed(physically or monitarally).Time and patience will reveal the truth.
99865
If it says it it on a secure site then it should be OK. If it says you are entering a site that is not secure then no.
545774
Set recovery questions. Also make sure to have a bank pin, that will at least prevent the hacker from stealing banked items.