From a basic standpoint, I can figure that this means something along the lines of "there are no exceptions for murder", but I'm curious to find out a deeper definition of what this phrase means (I suppose, from a deeper legal definition.)  Just something I'm curious about (I think I heard it referenced in an episode of 'X-files' once.)\nThanks.
121262
The statute of limitations are set by the federal and state governments setting maximum time periods during which actions can be brought or enforced.  After the time period has elapsed, no action can be brought regardless of whether a cause ever existed.  Example:  If someone gets hurt at his job, and the statute of limitations says the injured party has 2 years to file a suit, the injured person can not bring a suit after the two year period has elapsed, regardless of the fact that he was hurt and may have mounds of evidence.  \n\nThere are some actions on which there are no limitations, like murder.  If a murderer is caught, even 40 years after the murder, he can be prosecuted.
77598
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which can not fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance-that principle is contempt prior to investigation."\n     --HERBERT SPENCER
601472
One, I think the article is confusing…\n\nOk after like reading it for like 3 times over to get everything clear…\nI agree with what the article said, and I also think the definition should be universal, not just for certain entities.\nI also agree that it is a “much more serious crime of aggression”.\n\nI agree that a lot of times terror happens because one group thinks that their beliefs are more legitimate then another’s, and when they think they’re better they think they can force another to conform to it, usually this happens through force. All that the other can do is fight back; defend themselves. I think this is what he meant when he said: “Similar interesting issues about terror and resistance, almost always suppressed in the self-declared "enlightened states."”\n\nWhat would constitute terrorism?\n\nI think nothing, because I do not believe that terrorism / force / violence solves anything, it just creates more problems and makes stuff more complicated. I believe that one has the right to defend themselves in order to live and live how they wish, but nothing more. Defending yourself doesn’t mean you have to go on a shooting spree or go through with kidnapping schemes or trying to make others believe in what you think.\n\nYa know in the end of V for Vendetta (in the comic book, and kinda in the movie) V hands it off to Evey, he was the destructive force that brought down the system of oppression but she symbolized the rebirth of a new era of freedom and peace. After experiencing and committing such atrocities how could V go on to help the masses? For what, when the corrupt had fallen. Evey on the other hand had less of a violent history and because of that would most likely be more effective in carrying on V’s symbol since she will not have the luggage of old tendencies. This is assuming that V couldn’t heal himself from such violence he committed and experienced in the past, so instead handed it off to someone who could bring about a future that he truly wanted and dreamed of. Also by him going through with his final act would have been pushing his belief onto the masses, it was up to someone akin or who represented the masses (Evey) to commit the final act to bring down the system once and for all, it was not V’s place because that would have been a force against the masses, that and they may have not been ready for it. People need to free themselves before they can truly end a system that oppresses them. If the people’s minds weren’t freed then destroying the State would serve no purpose because it would be repeated all over again. I think people forget things like this, and that’s why some really good efforts of change are short lived because people forget to work on the root of the problem that also tends to lay within themselves(and everyone for that matter). For example if the root of the problem is money then what does money mean, then when we solve that problem how are we going to live without it and not just create another form of it? In other words how are we going to stop it from manifesting into similar things in the future? We have to be careful of that since we were once so accustom/use to it.\n\nAs for Noam Chomsky, I think he’s another academic old white man. One, the article was confusing because it was written so academic like, be forreal don’t try to prove yourself by fancy words. Plus I personally think the man still has some whiteness to work on. Other then that I think he’s done a great job in making the subject of Anarchism a more accepted topic in the academic world and is helping to give credit for it’s political perspective instead of just a philosophical theory.\n\n...\nto add to the notes you listed above after the Q:\n\nYes the IMF, WTO, and World Bank are horrific terrorists just as many governments and other financial institutions around the world are too. So I agree with “victor” the definition should be expanded upon. Yet it is peopl
369059
It basically means that the judge sees the case to be fit for trial... In other words the DA has strong evidence that the acccused is guilty...
62705
That sounds odd.\nExactly what is meant by "violation" in this context?
224095
To the best of my understanding, it means that a man who deliberately, and consistently causes chaos within his family would not have any family or inheritance for his old age. The second part talks about people who act like there are no consequences for their actions(the fool says in his heart, 'there is no God'). They would be made servants to people who are wise in heart.
390823
... hhmmmm.... have no idea...  it´s just a good phrase...\n\n=)
182951
Ooh, well said.  You're gonna get a lot of "but you didn't read the whole thing," and "but you don't UNDERSTAAANNND", and "how dare you twist the meaning of the bible", and "you're taking it out of context."  As if a story of infanticide could possibly be misunderstood or taken out of context.\n\nI've asked questions like this and I always get those kinds of non-answers.  I especially get a kick out of "but that's not what it means!"  When I point out that the meaning is perfectly clear, then they start spluttering how-dare-you and the conversation is over.\n\nKeep asking. Even the non-answers are educational.
118805
It means that you are straight, not a homosexual.\n\nbut you are not "Narrow"-minded.
6035
I agree with Felix above but am adding that it's origin is Latin and it means the way someone works (does things).  I am sure you have also heard it in movies and usually referring to Criminals when the Police say that's his or her M.O.  They are talking about the way they do something and that usually entails rituals or repeated actions.
56773
I think it just means "I'm going' to the jewlery store to get some grillz." I don't think he means to literally rob the jewlery store. So that would be my guess.
140314
Yep.  Makes perfect gramatical sense.  However, so does\n<Green dreams sleep furiously>  even though it doesn't make sense in any ordinary way.  \n\nIf there is any problem in your sentence,  maybe it has to do with the idea that something has <got frozen>. \nThat isn't something which happens often enough for it to trip off the tongue. \nAlso, does it mean that the program running froze/hung, or does it mean she dropped it in the icebox?  \n\nBut basically, no problem.  Sure it can be written.  Or should that be <certainly>?  :-)
269489
The first part is a bit difficult to translate, as it is not really clear Dutch, but there we go (I think the second sentence is an enumeration):\n\nI don´t know about what I can talk. Well, the series, connections with Webster´s family, what that family does or what kind of projects they have, his episode in CSI: Miami, episode 24.\n\nHe didn´t send much.\n\nI would like to call, you know, but it is quite exciting, isn´t it, and if I call, it would have to be at night, because of the time differences and so on, but then still.\n\nI hope this helps, it´s the best I can do. I'm sure it means something to you :-)
541547
Hi Violet.\n\nWhat area of tort were you reading about? I don't have this particular book as it is too far out of date.\n\nThere must be some context in which importance was attached to what was said, perhaps a reference to some precident or case?
75076
I think it means something like "Lead wings quickly turn into ashes!"\n\nDoes it now make any sense to you?
502475
well it means..that..if some one ask your favour..u can always say no to them in a nicer way..but dont insult them.\n\nit can also mean that..\nif u saw a group of people is hitting someone..u can always move away from that group even though u dont help that poor guy..but dont join them and hit that guy too...\n\nit also can mean that..\nif there is a begger asking for food...u can always choose not o give him anything at all..but do not stop another person from giving it...\n\nso in conclusion..if u can do any good its ok..but dont do any sin...
645399
Umm it is meant in a derogatory way. \n\n\nI found this from a site " illegal alien parents who have children born in the U.S. are seldom deported . That's why their children are called "anchor babies" - they anchor their families securely in the U.S.A."\n\n\nread more by clicking the link.