All that i know about it is just a small chip kept inside a rock or a stone..when this stone is thrown somewhere, the chip insiide it collects the information of that particular place.. plz send me detailed infn about it if anybody of u finds it..
124225
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4639782.stm
56573
All I can find is it's in Welland, Ontario.  It might be a cell phone.  You could always just ask them when they call back.
624697
Identification of a sedimentary facies (or any rock facies, for that matter) requires an intimate knowledge of the type locality of that particular facies, what major minerals constitute the lithogenics, and what the depositional/erosional/tectonic activity of the region was like since the formation of the facies.  \n\nFor example, when I was out west I was able to trace the Navajo sandstone throughout the four corners region, from the Grand Canyon all the way up through Utah.  There were points where the Navajo was the thickest facies, while in other regions the Navajo was very thin and nearly unnoticeable.  In those thin regions, the deposition of the Navajo might not have been as pronounced (sedimentary facies are formed by deposition of sediment), or the facies could have been exposed at the surface much longer than in other regions and subsequently eroded away.  You can determine if this happened by looking for unconformities between the Navajo and the facies above it.  \n\nHowever, there are certain characteristics of the Navajo (Aeolian remnants, highly silicic, slight oxidation) that make it the Navajo formation.  Despite the varying thickness of the facies, you can trace these rock characteristics throughout the American Southwest.  So yes, if a geologist wishes to determine the full extent of a lithogenic facies, they must attempt to trace that facies as far out as they possibly can, which means a lot of survey work.\n\nWhat most geologists do nowadays is check the state geological maps of the regions they're interested in and look for rock facies that match the facies of the rock they're studying.  Oftentimes facies that are the same facies are given 2 different names in different state geological maps.  If this occurs, the type locality of the rock is determined (IE, the best-represented sample of that rock), and the facies name is given based on the state the type locality is in.
109114
Geologists don't really know. And carbon dating has been proved to be inaccurate.\n   Just recently a geode was found.  A geologist looked at it and said it was 22 million years old, but when they x-rayed it they found a spark plug inside.  Guess what the spark plug was from 1961!!!!!  There are a lot of things being discovered in coal mines .     The coal layer is supposed to be 200 million years old but what are iron pots and brass bells and human bodies doing imbedded there.  They even found a concrete wall in one coal mine!!  Kind of makes you wonder about these things doesn't it?\n   The Bible says man has only been around about 6000 to 6500 years on the earth.
269591
I was looking at the images on livescience.com yesterday - but despite the useful red circles and scale maps telling me how big this 'anomaly' is, all I can see is ice and rock.\n\nSurely something 2000+ years old and made of wood would have perished in such an exposed location? I know human remains have been found in the French/Italian Alps pretty intact but they were buried under metres of snow and ice...
226282
This link should tell you all about it :o).\n\n\nhttp://www.answers.com/cilice?gwp=11&ver=1.1.2.381
97206
I have no idea. srry look it up
364133
I like this one I heard about the watch. If you found a watch on a rock in the middle of a field, how do you know someone made it? If you are like most these days, you'd point to the manufacturing mark on the back (or inside the cover if it was a pocket watch). So, how do you find proof of God or the Mother Goddess? If she is a creator wouldn't she continue to create? What on earth continues to create through a means which they really don't fully control? Life of course. So, we ourselves are the watch. Now what about ourselves proves that there must be an intelligent creator? Maybe our own intelligence (or lack there of at this moment in history) and maybe own uncanny ability to 'hear' inner wisdom. This wisdom has led many to extraordinary things. So, I disagree with Carl (Goddess I never thought I'd ever do that) that claiming the existence of Goddess is extraordinary. I have seen her work miracles in countless lives and there is record (yes, verifiable record) of millions more. I think the real miracle of this age isn't in finding Goddess, but in realizing how common she really is. Just as common as every watch still built with a crystal movement. I'm sorry, I think it is a small miracle that a tiny quartz crystal would be willing to vibrate that regularly so that we can all keep time.
68410
Check this out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rocks
116613
its a rock...\n\npencils...
407234
Wow, that's a tough one.  Is there any more info like where it might have been taken?  Where are you in the US?\n\nWithout more info you're going to be out of luck.
627232
They have an "About" page that explains what it's all about. However, I had to read it more than once, and STILL am not 100% able to explain it. It looks very "busy" and confusing. *chuckle* But I'd advise giving the page a try. The link is below.
577412
The fossil history is false. The scientists don't know what they are talking about. Radiometric dating is flawed. Everything is a lie except the Bible. I am trying out the other side of this argument. It's pretty weak I must say.
364668
Most rocks thought to be meteorites are not. There are what they call "meteorwrongs". I found a rock myself that's all metal and rather heavy. That's how I found this site. You could also take it to a museum. Someone there will know. Take a look at these pictures.\n.
620428
it is just like understanding a hyperbola. if you throw a stone in air it will feeling a force until it reaches the highest altitiude then it falls down as a projectile . the path traced by it may be in vector quantities
598889
No, that's not what all the fuss is about however even among secular scientists many believe that a ark found on the mountain is old enough for Noah's Ark.  I can not tell you whether or not that is the same object or not.  And lastly, with modern technology there is no such thing as a "grainy sattelite image".
335706
That's what makes a computer (silicon computer chips)\n\nit's called "silicon" computer chip not because it's silicon but because the semi-conductors (transisters) are planted in silicon (it's just the way they build them now to make them so small)\n\nEvery computer including the one you're on, Xbox, Printers, your cellphone, even calculators, etc... anything that is computerized has that chip in it.\n\nIn your computer you can find it on the mother board, it looks like that...\nhttp://www.enviroliteracy.org/images/page-spec//silicon-chip.jpg\n---it's about the right size too.\n\nThey are used to process the information, it's like your brain. It's the brain of the computer,it tells everything what to do, that's what makes everything work!\n\nWithout them, the computers will be huge (like a city block huge) Just like the ones people first built (with a bunch of wires and crap)\n\nAt the link below, you can see various silicon computer chips...\nhttp://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images?p=silicon+computer+chip&sm=Yahoo%21+Search&fr=FP-tab-img-t&toggle=1&cop=&ei=UTF-8\n\n\n\n\nAnd just a little extra for your school project...\nThis is how they make those silicone computer chips...\nI have a friend that works there, he got me one of the unfinished products (it's a shiny disk that's about the size of a waffle) It has like 100 of them on there and they cut them out with a microscopic water stream!!!...\n\nhttp://radio.weblogs.com/0105910/images/3dchip.jpg\n\nhttp://www.intel.com/education/makingchips/index.htm\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nCheers!!!\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n.