Do you think that organized fighting of humans should be banned ? Organized fighting for humans is lets say two familys or two kids don't like each other should they be aloud to fight in a boxing ring or something or do you think that all types of fighting should be banned.
123277
I think fighting is just part of life.  Organized fighting is legal however, and if you want to fight someone, that is the only way to do it legally.  But it is sometimes quite enjoyable to kick someones @ss back behind the school after school as well.
657167
Nope.... to much fighting.... and thats not including war :-P\n\nNo matter what you do someones gonna hate you... I couldn't live with that.\n\n\n------------------------------------------------
579073
Dude, it's a normal part of growing up. Siblings WILL ALWAYS fight. I used to be knocked out all the time by my older brothers and used to knock the heck out of my younger brother and still do. Personally,I think it's a way to let the kids keep each other on track and earn respect from younger siblings because if the older ones let the younger ones get away with being disrespectful, they'd lose their place in the hierachy. Plus it's a natural survival mechanism. If you can survive a fight or an argument with a sibling,you can survive a stranger because family tends to be meaner,tough love and all that. PLUS I think ultimately it eliminates sibling rivalry and the whole issue of favoritism if a parent can stand by and watch his/her kids duke it out,then that means they don't favor one above the other and it also means they want you to defend yourself from an early age...
38883
It depends on who's fighting,if it's kids I\nsay yes If they are grown you might get hurt\ntrying to stop them - I like to see two women\nfight,it's comical.
622732
Damn! Left out again! Not a C or an A. Why do these 2 groups fight all the time? It is getting boring. Old. Sick of it.\nLove & Light\nSharon\nOne Planet = One People
349875
i think that people who abuse children should be castrated but of course that is against their human rights but i think that it is against human rights to abuse a child. i think the same applies to all crimes and criminals. if you violate someone else's human rights than so should yours. people wouldnt be scared of this if they havent done anything wrong
476048
Great question! I think we would have a whole lot less wars if the people making the decisions to fight, or their kids who weren't allowed to be in hiding in the National Guard, were forced to be in the fighting.  Therefore, I have to answer that they should be in the fight.  If you send someone in to die you should be willing to die too.
502315
I saw it on the news.. and that is just really sad that people would even think that it is funny.. there is nothing right about making children fight, I'm sure they were hurt also. Some people I swear! I hope they go to jail for a long time.. Idiots! I really hope the children are ok. Sad world huh?
526071
I think dodge ball is ilegal for most adolecent organizations.  Just because they saw Dodgeball doesn't mean that its a good idea to play the dangerous sport.  But god would I like to sign up for one of those, so I can nail some asshole in the face!
597142
if you're looking at street fighting, its a whole different story. martial arts are good only to a certain extent. there are too many regulations when u spar to transfer over to real life fights. i took martial arts for many years of my life and i seriously think that it would hinder me from a real street fight. ive learned to control myself and not fight dirty. for a street fight type thing, i would recommend boxing, kickboxing, or freeform fighting styles that u see being used by the guys in ultimate fighter or pride fighting. and seriously, nowadays, its not like u can do too much against a gun...
633682
fight like fist fight? NO! Is it normal to disagree with one another, YES. Afterall you are two different people with different ways of thinking and then all of a sudden you are married to that person and living your daily life together. You better bet there will be arguments. If you never disagree you or your partner is a people pleaser type personality or you just figure its better not to ruffle any feathers and try to bury all your feelings, which in the end will blow up in your faces. If you are having a disagreement over a certain thing all the time, maybe it's better to seek counseling over the issue before there is too much resentment and the problem gets bigger. It's normal to laugh with your spouse as much as it is normal to have disagreements, it's life. How you handle them will definately determine whether or not you are married for long though. Best wishes!
507468
Lean to the left, lean to the right, stand up, sit down Fight Fight Fight!\n\ngreat for getting the crowd involved.
528324
Um, It's Miyamoto Musashi and it's the Book of 5 Rings. \n   Anyway, if we are talking about a "real" fight- a self defense situation- then you should first try to avoid it at all costs. Run away if possible, give the person what they want if you think that will end the threat. Nothing you have is worth risking your life...unless you think they will hurt you or someone else around you anyway. \n   If you do have to actually fight, make it as fast, as devastating, and as absolutely brutal as you possibly can. The longer your enemy is capible of hurting you the worse it is. There are no rules (other than the legal rights of ANY individual), there are no points for a take down, and no judges will award points after you lose. If it is TRULY self defense, hurt the enemy as bad as you can as fast as you can and then run away and call the police. \n   Nuff Said
668424
&^&^&^\n\nNot much just sophisticated street fighting
315274
Boxing is an excellent workout because it works all muscles in the body.  If you aren't interested in sparring, search for an aerobic boxing class or a boxing gym that does not expect people to spar if they don't want to.  Steer clear of any class or gym that appears to be too quick to throw people in the ring before they are ready.  If you want to spar, don't let anyone tell you that women can't.  Women can spar with the proper equipment: headgear, mouth guard, chest protector, and groin protector.  You can practice it for years.  Many people, including myself, took up boxing late in life, well after the age of 35.
508358
Yeah, fuck boxing! Tackle 'em, put 'em on the ground, get on top, and smash the shit out of their head. Everyone is comfortable standing up and fighting, but who the hell knows what to do on the ground?! Also, since it's 50 on 50, stay back and out of sight until everyone else starts going at it, then jump in and double team someone who's getting beatin up. After taking him out, you and the person you just helped should move on to someone who is getting beaten up. Once this chain has been started, the opposing force has no chance at all. But don't take a Marine's word for it...
592672
What do you consider "an assault against the person"\nto constitute?\n\nAN assault is causing the apprehension of immediate unlawful force (i.e. a battery) Therefore an assault against a person is meerely a threat of violence (whether that threat is a gesture eg raising fist, poised to punch or words, or even silence, R v Ireland)\n\nAssault is more commonly perceived as 'Common assault' The difference is that a common assault is an assault AND A BATTERY occuring simultainiously or in quick succession. (ie raising fist to punch, person sees it, therefore fears force, then the punch, the unlawful physical contact)\n\n\nIf you were in a pub and someone asked you to step\noutside, would you react any differently had they just\nattacked you in the pub? Please assume that you would\nhave stepped outside/ engaged in a fight with them.\n\nI would probably act differently, if i was attacked in the pub, my first efforts would be to take the fight outside. Obviously less restrictive of space, less things in the way, less chance of anybody getting caught in the middle. Outside, im already there, so theres no need!\n\nIf someone wished to fight you, would you see any\ndifference between fighting them in the street and/ or\nstepping into a boxing ring with them?\n\nYes, because boxing has rules and regulations on what you can do and what you cant. Street fighting doesnt because its illegal.\n\nDo you see a difference between sports such as rugby\nand boxing? If so, what do you perceive these\ndifferences to be?\n\nYes, again the rules and regulations. Plus you are consenting to a different type of contact. In rugby you are not consenting to being punched.\n\nDo you see any difference between two people fighting\nin the street and two people boxing in a ring?\n\nAgain, rules and regs! Plus that two people fighting in the ring generally are fighting for the sport of it. They abide by the rules, and when the bell sounds, they stop. If they are of the same boxing club in a practice, chances are they'll just throw off their head gear and gloves and start chatting like friends. Street fighting is just two people wanting to beat the crap out of each other.\n\nDo you see any difference between two people fighting\nin the street and two rugby players fighting on the\npitch?\n\nNo.\n\nDo you think full contact sports should be illegal?\nPlease give any reasons you may have. \n\nNo, theres no need for them to be illegal. What would the benefit be to society if they were illegalised? None. There would be no less strain on the legal system because only a handful of cases go to court because of the nature of the sports.\n\nLogicalawyer- I thought the point of R v Brown was that they were doing it for gay sexual pleasure. There was another case which the consent was from a wife to her husband to brand her or something, and it was allowed (i believe) In the case of sports, of course you can consent to battery (within the rules of play), otherwise how many cases do you think would go through the court? Lets think, Rooney would have been able to claim against who ever broke his foot, as would beckham in 2002, as would owen, as would anybody that got injured as a result of sport.