How is Vietnam better then Romania ?what have more then Romania ? i realy want an answer of this question , and who will respond very good that is a person who win points for a greta answer ?
133571
At the present there is no local yahoo site for Vietnam.\n\nAnyway, I'm sure yahoo does some sort of statistical analysis before opening a local site.\n\nAccording to the CIA world factbook Vietnam has close to 6 million Internet users whereas Romania 4.5 million, hence, it makes sense to target a larger population.\n\nAlso I'm sure that there are a lot more English speaking Romanians then Vietnamese.
662110
Many people have no idea what they are even talking about when it comes to the Vietnam war. They should educate themselves before they go around talking about it.  Anyone who draws a comparison between the Iraqi war and Vietnam doesn't have their facts straight.\n\nJust for fun, some stats on Vietnam:\n91% of Vietnam Veterans say they are glad they served \n74% said they would serve again even knowing the outcome \n2/3 of men who served in Vietnam were VOLUNTEERS.\n58,148 US servicemen died.\n\n\n58,148?? That doesn't even bear comparison to just over 2000 in Iraq.  \n\nIt is very easy for people in the U.S. to sit on their couches and critize the war and our president. Keep in mind the men and women fighting for us are the ones that give you the freedom to sit on your couch!!
136818
There are way too many comparisons to even get started.  The economic circumstances as they relate to foreign trade and relations are nearly identical.  The "military advantage" over the conquered is identical.  The transformation of republic into totalitarian rule is identical.  To think that just because we repeat history but we throw more money and we have more technology so the outcome will be different is just ignorance and arrogance mixed...which the Romans had in spades just like us.
258627
We are a lot Romanians and I wrote in English to avoid your problem.But putem vorbi romaneste ori de cate ori ai chef,mai ales ca observ cu bucurie ca mai si dam clasa multora.S'apoi?
608027
Austraila was one of the 25 S.E.A.T.O nations that fought to keep the Republic of Vietnam free from communist dommination.\n\nFrom a military point of view, Austraila did almost nothing, I think they sent a battalion of troops.  But from the diplomatic standpoint, they were important.  \n\nAustraila was also a popular R&R destination for troops in Vietnam.
495649
I love your country, regardless to what other folks might say. My time in France taught me a lot about your people and culture, and it showed me that people can be different. Some people cannot tolerate difference, so they hate. Yeah, your country is a lot like ours, and those who say otherwise either have a seperate opinion, or they have never truly seen France.\nOne must see the entire country in order to begin a major opinion upon the country's differences.\nBTW, your English is good, keep it up.
591759
While there are some valid parallels to be drawn between the two conflicts (such as they were both started under false pretenses), the underlying politics of the two situations are very different. In Viet Nam there was the oppressive communist North encroaching on the fledgling Democracy in the South. In Iraq there are three extremely faith-based factions vying for power (Sunnis, Shias, and Kurds) with an outside party (US) calling the shots. Our motives for being in Iraq are also very different than those for being in Viet Nam... there was no monetary gain to be had from fighting the war in Viet Nam, and there most certainly is in Iraq, and I'm not just talking about Oil either. The U.S. has a vested interest in achieving stability in Iraq because then there will be lots of oil money to be spent on lucrative contracts for the companies (Haliburton e.g.) who can rebuild the Iraqi infrastructure, and once Iraq's economy is really booming there will be myriad ways for corporations in the U.S. to exploit it for their own gain. This is a pattern which the U.S. has repeated all across South America, and the entire world for that matter. Viet Nam is small potatoes compared to Iraq... it is a tribute to our superior military technology that we have only been forced to sacrifice 2,500 men in Iraq whereas we sacrificed 52,000 men in Viet Nam.
411579
What type of economic system is utilized (market, command, mixed, traditional)? \nWHATEVER SUITS THEM.  IT IS SUPPOSEDLY MARKET DRIVEN, BUT ONLY IF IT SUITS THE FRENCH, AND THERE IS A LOT OF GOVERNMENT SUBSIDY (MOSTLY ILLEGAL)\n•Is it a rich or poor country? \nTHE POOR PARTS ARE VERY POOR\n•Is unemployment a problem in this country? \nNOT AS BAD AS IT SHOULD BE BECAUSE OF OUTDATED LABOUR LAWS AND GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES (MOSTLY ILLEGAL)\n•What are the natural resources? \nSOME COAL, AGRICULTURE\n•Is there a connection between its natural resources and the products it makes? \nONLY AGRICULTURAL\n•What cultural aspects are there (religion and language)? \nNOMINALLY CATHOLIC, SPEAK FRENCH\n•What is the present relationship that this country has with the United States? PROBABLY BEST DESCRIBED AS POLITE MUTUAL HATRED
25576
Hi there.  I'm military, and I don't have any trouble seeing the parallels between the two. First, Viet Nam was a morally ambiguous war.  Lots of people thought we shouldn't have been there in the first place, and lots of people believed that our actions were doing more to prolong the war and harm the population than allowing the Communists to take over would have.  The enemy we fought was basically a guerilla force that used asymmetric warfare.  The management of the war was criticized as being (at times) militarily inept as well as fiscally wasteful.  Then, as now, there were unconvincing official pronouncements of progress from the administration's spin doctors. (How many times have we heard about the insurgency being played out, or that we had turned the corner, or that they were "on their last legs" as Dick Cheney said last summer?)  Then there's the whole sense that the war could drag on year after messy year without any clear hope of victory.      \n\n\nThere are, of course, important differences. In Viet Nam, there were front lines.  The enemy had territory, and they were far more numerous and cohesive than the Iraqi insurgency is.  The Viet Cong were an army, even if their hit hard then melt away tactics seem superficially like the Iraqi insurgents'.  US soldiers were largely draftees that did not want to be in the service at all, unlike our all-volunteer servicemen today.
130640
I have been in Moscow and i saw that they were more powerful when they have a communist regime.They had an unity.I am looking at China and they are very powerful too.\n\nSo, i think communism is not bad.
437017
Hmmm. Not to sure about that. But i do see ppl still talking about France and Italy. =D
158740
I really wouldnt worry about it too much.  No doubt about it parts of America are full of racism.  Romania doesnt happen to be a country we are against right now so I would not fret. \n\nThe Grand Canyon area is beautiful and the people there are sweet & kind.  For the most part racism is a choice few people that believe for instance all Muslims are terrorists.  ( To all Muslims out there, this is not my belief)
197255
unfortunatly romania has a long history of hard times , coruption goes hand in hand with desparation ,, why do you think she gets naked on webcam for maybe $200 a monht if she is VERRY lucky?
482653
You should not speak of things you know not of.\n\nVietnam was divided into two countries before and during the war.  North Vietnam was the aggressor in the Vietnam war.  The NVA, North Vietnamese Army, and the VCs, the Viet Cong, killed more innocent people than what is stated in your specious comment.\n\nPlus, your figure includes the 600,000 NVA killed in legitimate combat and the estimated VC casualties also legitimate combat kills.\n\nGet your facts straight before you make such comments.\n\nFurthermore, your statement insults the brave men that were in the US Armed Forces during the war!
248303
Why someone is required to make a comparison between these two countries.........they are two different countries and are distinct in thier identities...No comparison is possible in the countries...if u are talking about the western power's strategy they don't compare the countries they compare thier own advantages and interests associated with countries.... and about distinction that they can't made...when the countries have accepted both the countries there is no question of not distinguishing between the countries..
271008
Miss, I am terribly sorry about what the USA did to your country. I was there. What we did was inexcusable. Saying I was ordered to do it is pretty lame. Your country, what I saw of it, was beautiful. The people I met and meet now are resourceful and have been pretty smart. I know the US trades with you now. Take care of your people. Be careful in dealing with the Western world. Do not let the multinationals strip your resources away.
626333
thanx 4 apologizing, don't worry abt it pple mke mistakes, i should also say sorry, i was a bit harsh with my comment. \nI think brazil are a galaxy of stars i wud have probably said the same thing in my question as u did, and brazil is a great country, every country has its ups and downs, even france.\n\nBRASILIA IS GONNA WIN!!!!!!!!!