Is it because they're vulnerable to rhesus-factor as a fetus that would make them died in a womb?because they die earlier then the females?because they are breeders?because they are majority among working class?because they have a good physical and mental requirements to protect his people and became the head of his own family?Any ideas boys and gals?
137053
The reason that most of us boys wear Pampers(really nice brand name diapers) is a general laziness about using conventional bathrooms, and unless we are paired with a mate the attitude towards comfort and convenience becomes skewed in favor of watching more television without interuption or as in this format being able to answer or read more questions. Oh!! Pampered, my mistake. The reason boys are pampered more then girls is a bias towards the future that is held by some cultures in that the son of a family will not require the help of the family core but contribute to it, and should the nation become involved in conflict the males traditionally were the defenders of the nation. Thankfully these cultural idioms are becoming less pervasive as the world continues towards the global village status. I hope this helps and don't be shy asking about why boys in many cultures wear diapers, as this is an issue that should be explored. Thank you for your question.
661810
He was very much paying attention.  There are a couple of reasons.  The Bible tells us not to worry about the folks that can kill the body but the one that can kill the soul.  Remember at the trial of Jesus when the people were calling for Jesus to be crucified, they agreed that Jesus' blood would be on their childrens' heads.  God also provided folks such as Schindler to save some.  God is always watching and paying attention, but it is part of the foretold birthpains.
466993
...is it really such a "horrible death".... considering the alternative... \n\nMany a "sperm" has died by the "hand of man"... (pun intended)..\n\nat least, these little "soon to be dead" guys... "were aimed towards heaven"...
196615
Because they don't have idle time on their hands.  They are always busy doing the church group things.  Which are normally not directed towards violence.  Their time and their minds are taken up with activities the church group is doing.  It's really a matter of occupation.  Fill up their lives with a group that's doing good things, with caring adults around to watch for any problems.
176094
Because you are little more than BREEDERS, for them to produce more offspring so to spread their religion. If they can't accomplish that by appealing to peoples hearts or morals.......why not produce offspring that can be indoctrinated with their B.S. from birth!\nMormons are NOTORIOUS for this!\nlittlemiskato....hope you like being a tool.\nPS, I pity tools.
431105
Because in order to deflect from the fact that most women are killing their babies because they're 'inconvenient', they have to do a lot of scaremongering.\n\nSo you have the 'rape' and 'incest' scare factors, and throw in the 'back-alley coathanger dying by the 1,000's' myth, and you've eliminated the picture of a tiny baby being chopped up and vaccuumed out, or being burned in a brine solution, or having its head pierced and its brains sucked out.\n\nI guess the feminists are still following Margaret Sanger's eugenicist desire to have fewer minority babies.
655595
Because they're genetically incapable of success in a modern world. Being evolutionarily wired for a prehistoric existence doesn't allow for modern technology and the behavior necessary to function in a society so equipped.
342833
Hmmm, seems like typical right-wing rhetoric, based on a complete lack of facts.  \n\n#1.  Human babies are not a species, humans are.\n#2.  Even considering human babies as a collection, their numbers do not indicate that they are endangered.\n\nIf the right-wingers put some thought into it, they would see that the "endangered" class would be the babies of women who are pro-choice.  You would think that would be a positive outcome for them.
508213
its a hypocritical name that some people use. some people are only pro life in terms of a fetus, but they support the death penalty, which we all know has some problems.
674361
Their culture is one of death - so being a martyr is glorified.  life is a transient time and everything is for paradise in the world to come.\nThey kill they're sister if they think she is dihonorable\nthey kill a landowner that will sell his property to an infidel\nthey kill you if you marry an infidel.  everything for them is black or white with know higher understanding of the gray areas
321334
There are a number of reasons.\nYes, they are in need of a savior.\nThey are jealous.\nThey want to see if they can get a arise out of us.\nFar to often we get cocky and they want to make us fall.\nSatan is their father and he hates us.
669657
I don't think it was their DNA. It was probably meant to mean just that they were happy and had no trouble with each other and they were cool. Then one day they were lead into temptation and the sinned and they were then separated from God somewhat... therefore they had to live without his help.
210994
because males MAY use them as stimulation receptors, they aren't ruled out by evolution\nso infact that are used, just not like females use them (think about it, if a male has nipples and uses them this way, then he would be able to spread his charateristic to more females thereby increasing the popularity and favorability of the trait)\nas for the question of why they there in the first place...\nits one of those characteristics that are kept when the baby is developing in the womb
582993
I think that it is a lack of a normal sex life that makes them like they are. They are only allowed sex once a month and then only in the missionary position for procreational purposes only. That is why they were so mad at Clinton for getting a hummer in the oval office. Jealousy is a terrible emotion.
610680
~Among the Montagnard people of the central highlands, the first and third born are always male.  Every female child born out of sequence is immediately smothered by the mother on delivery and the corpse is consumed by the village as part of a fertility ritual 3 days later, to aid the mother in  conceiving again.\nThe first born son, on his second birthday, is taken to the forest and left for three days.  The father retrieves him after the ordeal.  If the child survives, he is deemed worthy to inherit the family lands and property and is raised accordingly.\nThe second son is spared this ritual unless the first son proves unworthy and dies.  Assuming his brother has survived, the younger son is raised essentially as a vassal to the elder, it being the intention that he will fill his brother's sandals when the older boy dies.\nFemale children are raised basically to fulfill on of two functions.  They are either beasts of burden or baby makers.  The village wise men inspect female children between the ages of 8 and 18 months.  Those with the proper anatomical structure deemed appropriate for conception and childbearing are pampared and have to work the rice only half days, while their sisters are groomed to work the fields, and tend to the manual labor necessary to maintain the household and village.  Often, these otherwise useless children are sold to neighboring villages.\n\nChildhood games for the boys are centered around hunting and battle themes, as the boys will someday be required to provide the village with meat and defend it against attack from outsiders.  By the time they are 8 years old, the boys play these "games" with real weapons, and it is far from rare that children are killed by their playmates in the course of these games.   \n\nThe girls are prohibbited from playing games.  They are cast into their permantent roles as soon as they learn to walk, and by the age of 5, they can be seen lugging water jugs weighing up to 25 Kg from the village water source to their homes.  The 'breeders', by the age of 9, are 'instructed' by the village elders in the mechanics of reproduction.\n\nThere are many rituals and customs followed by the Montagnards, with whom my father lived for 4 years in the 60's (and one of whom he married),  but due to limited space, I cannot relate them here.  You should research them.  They are fascinating people.  My mother has become westernized to some extent, but she is appalled by the way westerners coddle their young.  Dad and I have tried to convince her to write a book about her people, but she refuses to do so.  To a Montagnard, sharing secrets of village life with outsiders in the past has led to the anihilation of entire villages by raiders and is taboo.
35509
because we are the stronger sex. can you imagine a man on the rag, or having a baby. the world would stop. a man couldnt handle the pain
113950
There are many reasons, and only the person getting the abortion knows the real reason why they are having it.  \n\nSome reasons could be they were raped, they are too young and don't want their parents to know or don't know what to do with the child, the don't want to carry the baby for 9 months and then give it up for adoption or care for the child until such a time that they can care for themselves, they had an affair and don't want their husband find out, there could be something medically wrong with the child, health issues for the parent and/or child, etc.\n\nThere are many, many reasons and only the person having the abortion knows their reason for going through the abortion.