This is about brain-base learning and educational psycology and philosophy.
125543
That's the Akashic model. It's a combination of spirtualism with genetic memory. Snakes for example are born knowing everything they need, how to feed, move, how to hiss and bite and the complex rituals of mating. Human babies know how to suckle for milk, and blind children smile when happy although they've never seen anyone do it and couldn't learn what it meant.\n\nThe Akashic model goes further and says that either \nA) all wealth of human knowledge is genetically imprinted at some level (you're DNA holds everything about life, health etc. while the atoms in your body are aware of the laws of physics, your mind knows social functions, conversation etc.) and through learning, viewing others, hearing explanations this knowledge is unlocked and brought forth into the conscious mind (the biological approach)\n\nB) All wealth of human knowledge throughout time is held on a different level of consciousness, or a different plane of existence that transcends time and space, and since every atom, every thing and every person in the universe are connected and react to each other (Butterfly effect) it is in theory possible to connect to this universal knowledge simply by one person at some point knowing what you want to know. (this goes into Metaphysics and spiritualism). They are referred to as the Akshic Records, and some beleive to become fully conscious of them is to reach Nirvana and Enlightenment
506254
Simply, every one perceives and processes information differently. Some people are better at using one area of their brain compared to others.\n\nPeople learn differently, some people learn best by experiencing something first hand. Some learn best by hearing someone talk about it and some by seeing it.\n\nMost artists would be the third type of learner, they best process information by seeing the object/subject in question.
69562
One is thinking and one is doing?\nLook at the modules in the course and see if one has more theory or maths than the other.
49861
Yes, the complexity of the music exercises the brain.
472614
Somehow I doubt it. Amoebas as single-celled organisms do not have brains and therefore no memory -- all they have is what biological reflexes are encoded into their DNA, like aversion to strong light. To teach something a "trick", it has to have the capacity to associate the stimuli with a desired action and remember that one means the other. Doing that without a brain, I think, is nigh well impossible.
647070
it's called "proper education"
76856
the implication of cognitive learning is no different from cognitive realization and being.
179947
It is well-established that the human brain has the capacity to take in an infinite amount of knowledge and information, far more than our 80 years of life allows.  It is also well-established that the human body is constantly repairing, renewing and replacing itself, and should go on doing so.  The human body, by design, should live forever and should be forever young. The  medical field cannot understand why it is not so. These two facts alone demonstrate that this life, logically, is not all there is.
227539
Absolutely correct. The compounds in the Leaves are food for the brain. You are not borne with all the knowledge in the world and life is too short to learn from your mistakes, you must learn from others and one of them is what to consume in order to bring health and well being to the body that you inhabit.
532608
Computers are lacking in their capability to learn. They tend to surpass humans in pure rationality issues, and eventually they'll be better at certain things humans are good at intuitively just by taking in enough information. However, the algorithms for a computer's intelligence requires everything to be objective. So there's no way for it to interpret something unless there's an algorithm there to determine how to interpret it. In short, the brain is self-programming. A computer does not really have that capability. To do such would require human beings knowing how to program computers that can program brains. And at that point, we might as well just program our own damned brains to be like that.\n\nBut in terms of raw processing speed, sure, computers will eventually surpass mankind. After all, if nothing else, they're likely using superior technology. All we have is a bunch of neurons and whatnot.
109564
I'm an individual learner under this method of categorization.\n\nBased on your question, you might be interested in reading about multiple intelligences theory if you haven't already done so.  It's quite interesting.  I've attached a couple of links in case you're interested.
129693
The limbic system of your brain has corrupted your worldview, but that's to be expected in a very insecure universe.  People who are enlightened use their cerebral cortex to look for the creative side of life and for happiness here on earth during the short sojourn between the random event of birth and the random nothingness of death.
442364
Brain implants so that you can learn without any effort, like on The Matrix.\n\nOr Yahoo! Answers.
261455
They come from the stem of the brain.
604618
Early sexual stimulation and love and affection allow the cortex to grow faster and usually leaves an extra fold in the brain's outer layer. Now you explain why you think it is proper to ask mentally ill people about photographic memories. Do you know something you didn't tell us in the question. Why not be fully honest with us?
169551
I think you would get some better answers if this was asked in philosophy ;-)\nApart from that my first thought was; which reflex systems?\nAlso it don't make sense to me really.  Seems like some words are in the wrong place but then i am no good at proper philosophical lingo.\nIt's a two way sword, if you redefine mind from a scientific viewpoint you will need the evidence and then you end up in neurochemistry and what they call biological psychology.\nIf you redefine it from a philosophical viewpopint then it would come under philosophy of mind and have a look here what that is about: http://forums.philosophyforums.com/Metaphysics-and-Epistemology.
214304
I know a little about ontology as it relates to AI\n\nThere a list of ontologies at the first site, skimmed it. did not see anything but I may have missed something that you might like.\n\nThere a ontology on bibloograhy of the pholosophy of Mind\nwhich may be useful.\n\nContemporary Philosophy of Mind: An Annotated Bibliography \nThis is a bibliography of recent work in the philosophy of mind, philosophy of cognitive science, philosophy of artificial intelligence, and on consciousness in the sciences