Many non-Republicans wonder if there even EXISTS such a thing that would turn Republicans against bush. e.g., let's say theoretically he was found guilty of conspiring to out Valerie Plame or smear Wilson, or he was found to have "designs" on Iraq pre 2003 and approved altering intel in order to invade Iraq, or he had approved illegal wiretapping, etc.\n\nFeel free to vent your anger towards me for even asking, or all non bushies, but try to answer the question if you can.
132687
Maybe if he invaded the wrong country instead of continueing to go after the man that attacked us... oh wait, he did that...\nMaybe if he tried to give our ports away to a country that was linked to 9-11 in the 9-11 report... oh wait he did that...\nMaybe if he nominated someone completely incompetent to the Supreme court, like Harriet Meyers... wait he did that...\n\nhahaha... I don't know... \nMaybe if he got head in the White House... the unpardonable sin
439534
Yes, I heard it and "Big Surprise".  The terrorists made no effort to hide the fact they were rooting for a democrat victory.  Anything to embarrass the "Devil" George Bush.  I think the U.S. needs to use more intelligence from Iraqi's and use air strikes to take out these morons.  I'm a Republican and I'm for a gradual reduction in troops.  I think we could be out except for a small force within 3-4 years.
566918
And what about that CIA lady that Rove had killed cause her husband was a critic?  Oh yeah he denied it..so it must not be true...lol.\n\nWhat happened to the guy Cheney shot while hunting with their mistresses?\n\nThat story kinda disappeared.\n\nAnd what IS the deal between Bush and Rice?  lol  cant get that image out of my mind (true or not its just funny)\n\nRemember when the nazis get mad and call names its cause your point hit home.  Maybe one will disagree respectfully?  Not likely...but would be a nice change.\n\nbtw. Liberal simply means free...Con means trick.\n\nPS  just read Larry's post....there it goes again the persistent view that Iraq was connected to the towers...where do they get this info from?  A couple of headlines and these people will want to invade anyplace and kill anyone.  The power of propaganda.\n\nLove your enemy good Christians.
280260
Doesn't work for conservatives because Bush isn't a conservative.  Remember there is a difference between a conservative and a Republican. Bush is a neocon Republican which is a liberal on spending and wants a one world government.  I as a Conservative would prefer no impeachment but would like him out and a true Conservative in but no Hillery. I an hower afraid we may be on a downward spiral on all your issues regaurdless.
353306
I've heard the argument that he didn't have enough information to move forward with since even the accusation would ruin Folley's career. He had only been told that Folley was acting in a way that was very concerning, definitely not enough info to accuse ... right ?(*cough looks to left then right*).  My thoughts on the matter is why not simply enact a warrant less domestic wiretapping on him that way no one had to know .... oh wait at the time congress had been bypassed about the whole program in a flagrant abuse of the presidents power. Well I'm sure some type of low profile investigation could have been possible.
455784
I've already heard mention that some investigation of Bush's conduct in office will probably be instituted in the future. Right now the Dems are savoring their win and will proceed slowly at first. Don't look for too much rhetoric about this investigation until after the Dems take control in January. We still have two months of a lame duck Republican congress to endure.
355632
Gosh, what makes you think Bush, or Republicans in particular, would practice dirty tricks? Seriously, the real problems may be the economy, the depleted  military and a domestic terror attack or two. We'll be out of Iraq by then; even though we have 140,000 troops there, the country is close to "chaos" according to a recent Pentagon assessment.
297386
HE LEFT THE QUESTION TOTALLY OPEN TO DEFEND BUSH ANY WAY YOU CAN... TALK ABOUT ANY GOOD POINT...\n\nYOU APPEAR, FOR THE MOST PART, TO BE HAIVNG PROBLEMS DOING IT (GRANTED, HE MAY HAVE CALLED THEM LIES, BUT IT'S STILL AN OPEN FORUM)... I CAN UNDERSTAND WHY YOU WOULD HAVE PROBLEMS...\n\nI SWEAR TO GOD I COULD DEFEND HIM BETTER THAN HIS FANS DO ON HERE... GEEZ!
95491
3/4 of the U.S. have to oppose Bush, and you have to have a Congress that would Impeach him. Since the Congress is 100% "RIGHT WINGED" right now at the present, and the Democrats and Independents don't have any vote. It will change in November, just watch. I have seen this with the Ragan/Bush Administration's of the 80's early 90's. His approval ratings are at 33% so it is possible.
296875
Keep an eye on Sen Russ Feingold (from Wisconsin I think) he stood up in Congress and BLASTED Bush, calling for his impeachment, and made a very  impressive, eloquent speech detailing the lies Bush told to Congress and the American people. \nI would love it if Congress put him out of our misery by impeaching him and sending him to be tried as the war criminal he is.
187243
both parties lie... and commit crimes... there are bad apples in both parties... and lip service is a trademark of the Republican party... I haven't seen a problem solved under Bush yet... maybe catching Saddam, but even that has created a power vaccum that doesn't look like it's going to turn out well...\n\nHow about stop whinning about the past and try to make a difference for once?
634770
I actually brought up that scenario once to some friends, and they thought I was daft.  Since you seem to be thinking the same thing, maybe it's not such a far-fetched thing?  If not George W. then his brother, Jeb?  I wouldn't put it past the Republicans to do such a thing.
436639
If the Democrats impeached Bush, it would likely result in a backlash against them and I'm sure they hope they keep Congress and gain the presidency in the next election.  The Democrats have insisted that, while they plan to investigate much of why we went to war and what has been going on with it, they have no plans to impeach the president.  \n\nNow if it turned out that Bush had truely committed some very horrible or deceitful act (such as masterminding 9/11 - which I do NOT believe he did, this is purely an example), I imagine the public would be very galvanized to have him impeached and the Democrats would probably do it.  But even a large number of Republicans in Congress stated that if Bush lied about why we went to war in Iraq, even they would vote to impeach him.\n\nConsidering the relationship of Bush and Cheney, if some scenario as above were true, it would probably be a repeat of what happened to Agnew and Nixon in Watergate.
373662
Anne, you mean he didn't get caught! You don't know for sure if he ever has, Him and ole Rice are pretty good buddies!\n\nBush has probably never told the truth about anything! Maybe we should post what he said that weren't lies rather than those that were! I have a lot of them on tape, but Neocons don't even believe him when he says it! He said there was no WMD's in Iraq, the neocons basically called him a liar and said that their were! I have him on tape saying Iraq had nothing to do with terrorist or 9/11 and that we attacked Iraq to "Give them Hope Ken!" We could sure shorten up some of the blogs!\n\nOh yes, You-tube removed the video of him talking to a reporter while some illegals jumped the fence behind him!
198797
1) Why are impeachment hearings not going on for President Bush?\nA) wire tapping\nB) lied to american people to go to war\nC) has been quoted after 9/11 saying, "find a way to get us into iraq"\n\nAnswers:\nA) The wire tapping was legal, and judged so by the courts.  Your efforts to encourage impeachment in a time of war is seditious and a serious condemnation of either the level of your education, or the commitment you have to our country.\nB) Lied? Consider the following: \nKerry, Former President Clinton (during and after his terms), Edwards, Former First Lady Hillary Clinton, the U.N., all of these said Saddam had WMDs (We know he did, we watched him use them on his own people).  President Clinton said in one speech that our experts watched Saddam smuggle weapons out back doors while the U.N. investigators were coming in the front door (during his terms).\n\nThe excuse that they all depended on President Bush's "lie" doesn't work.  President Clinton said Saddam had them before President Bush ever did, and Saddam himself was telling his allies that he had them!\n\nYour seditious rumor that "Bush lied" is seen for what it is by the U.S. citizens, and expect it to be an expensive attempt to undermine our country and our elected leaders.  Not that we will all vote Republican!  I'm a Democrat, but I have no interest in voting for name-calling, seditious, lying representatives who carelessly spread rumors.  I will vote for a Democrat with ethics, or if their isn't one, perhaps whoever has the most ethics in another party.\n\n3) All of us have had enough of people taking sound-bytes out of context.  Do some actual research instead of attacking our country and look at the rest of what the President said.  He did say it.  The U.N. was not getting the job done, Saddam wouldn't allow U.S.A. inspectors to come in.  President Bush wanted to "get into Iraq" to get the job done the U.N. failed to do for a decade.\n\nWe see what you are doing, both Democrats and Republicans.  We know that we (Democrats and Republicans) are not the enemy.  Oh, we disagree, but we stand behind the elected leaders of our country, majority democratic choice, legal dissent and disagreement, and most of all, each other.\n\nWe stand against name-calling of our leaders (Presidents Clinton or Bush, or any other).\n\nWe stand against spreading unfounded rumors and lies.\n\nWe stand against what you are doing.\n\nYou want to actually discuss wire tapping?  Do some research and then dissent, without trying to attack our leader.\n\nYou want to disagree with why we went to war?  Great.  Stop telling us a lie about the President.  He may have been wrong.  That is not a lie.\n\nYou want to quote him?  Quote him in context and at least quote something about the subject you are actually talking about rather than transposing a quote from one subject (getting U.S. inspectors into Iraq) to another (the decision to go to war).\n\nWhat you do sickens us, and our country, literally.\n\nYou may have Free Speech, but so do we.\n\nExpect us to answer you.
308876
On the charges of high crimes and misdemeanors, crimes of treason and murder, crimes against humanity, environmental crimes, war crimes, etc… Every thing except getting a B-Job from an intern, come on…uhhh!!!... You will find no stains on Gorge Bushes staff, he did learn something from Clinton, like how to clean up your tracks… Anyhow according to the Republican right; (right as in the truth) who get there information solely from Fox News the only true and uncensored source of information in the world, know that they get both sides of the story, Bushes side and Cheney’s side. They know that there is absolutely no proof or evidence what so ever that Bush and Cheney lied and took us into an illegal war. And screw the 71 percent of traitorous liberals in America and 95 percent of the rest of the world, there just made our guy stole the (or woops) I mean won the elections. Hey show me one shred of proof or one dead body on Fox news. And how do we know Sadom had  weapons of mass destruction? Com on --!!! Again people, WAKE UP! We have the receipts to prove it!\n\n  So go ahead and vote to impeach, see if you can get away with it. And if you think the Fuehrer was bad, wait and see what the Emperor Cheney does, after he pardons Gorge  W. He will make him the vice president. And then what are you going to do, impeach Cheney? Ha Ha Ha HA HA LOL and all that crap, you stupid peace loving liberals are screwed.
279683
It's going to take the removal of George Bush to find out what has really been going on. I say he is implementing a whole right wing intelligence agency to benefit himself and his criminal buddies. Hitler did, and so did Stalin, so I think Bush jumped on the band wagon. You just remove all that opposes your views. Bush has done this, because I believe he has plenty to hide from and is covering his tracks. There are way to many Republicans getting indicted for crimes right now, and I am sure they aren't even the real criminals. Criminals always stay out in plain sight acting like they haven't done anything wrong. George Bush is a prime example of this.