I was just wondering what the children of Prince Charles and the late Princess Dianna call the Qeen
129417
In public and on all formal occasions, she is called Your/Her Majesty.  Naturally, in private, they call her grandma, or nanna, or whatever...
285143
Name: Princess\nOrigin: English\nMeaing: Royal Daughter
643609
When the monarch dies or abdicates, the crown passes to the next in line.\nIf the outgoing monarch has one, the first in line is the eldest son (so Prince Charles is currently first in line), or the eldest son of the eldest son (Prince William is second in line).\nWhen the previous King died in 1952, he had no sons. First in line was his eldest daughter, Princess Elizabeth, so she became Queen Elizabeth II.\n\nBecause sons have priority over daughters, there have been more Kings as monarch than Queens.\nHowever, the wife of a King is also called a Queen, whereas the husband of a Queen is not called a King, but a Prince-Consort.\nHence Elizabeth II is Queen, and Phillip is Prince-Consort.
136519
I have a niece...named Joan.  She was called Joanie until she graduated H.S.  At that time, her parents requested we all switch to the more adult Joan.
298878
hey, i'm a stevenson! i don't have a clue about what you are talking about with royalty..however, i would like my stipend too...and i suppose a title so i can prove it's owed to me, also...i'm into genealogy and i did some famdamily history on stevenson..and i actually found living relatives who also do tree limb leaves...who are realted to me by stevenson..if you'd like i can get you his name and you can see if you are realted to him, me and robert louis stevenson...i also found 5000 plus other names that were related!
416345
she had 2 go.\nshe was about 2 marry a Muslim.\nthe royal family would have never stood 4 it.\nthe future king of England having Muslim half-brothers and sisters!\nthat and she was only a baby incubator 4 Charles, wasn't she?\nhe had his shacking up with Camilla in the pipe-line 4 a long long time.  he always knew Diana would cramp his style.\nmore reasons 4 her 2 go than letting her stay.\nit'll never b fully investigated, not properly.\n2 many people will lose than gain.
327520
Hon, I want to help out but there are quiet a few Charles Jordans???\n\nCheck out the website below maybe it will help you.\n\nCharles Gordon may be:\n\nCharles George Gordon (1833-1885), ("Chinese" Gordon), British soldier & colonial governor \nCharles Gordon (producer) \nCharles Gordon (humorist), Canadian journalist \nCharles Grant Gordon, beverage entrepreneur \nCharlie Gordon (born 1951), British politician \nCharles Gordon (CFL) (fl. 1990s), Canadian football player \nCharles Gordon (KU) (fl. 2000s), American football player
321878
Michael is NOT her name. But this was a very interesting question. I found the answer on the Princess' official web site:\n\nTraditionally, all wives of male members of the British Royal Family, the aristocracy and members of the public take the style and title of their husbands. Diana, Princess of Wales was not "Princess Diana" as the media called her, because she was not born a British princess. Her correct title was The Princess of Wales and when she divorced she became Diana, Princess of Wales. When the present Duke of Gloucester was still Prince Richard prior to the death of his father, his wife was known as Princess Richard. It just so happens that Prince Michael is the only grandson of a king titled HRH who is a second son and so there are no other princesses with the name of their husbands. The other princesses in the British royal family were all born into the royal house.
320147
Actually, the rules of Succession are already set. The rules have been evolving over many centuries. In the UK, Prince William succeeds after his father. If Charles dies before HM Queen Elizabeth (may her reign be long), then Prince William is next. Prince Philip will never inherit the throne because there are far too many people ahead of him in the royal succession, something like 15 people or more. \nRefer to www.royal.gov.uk there is a wealth of information here, and a list of people in the line of succession.
451101
Is it fair that Prince William gets to be king and I don't?\n\nIs it fair to everyone else in the UK that their tax dollars go to support a family of unelected morons?\n\nLife isn't fair.  From where I'm sitting, Prince William is one of the luckiest of us.
37218
As an American, I have nothing to say about it but then again, the average British subject has nothing to say about it either.  Prince Charles has done very little to regain the popularity he lost following his split with Princess Diana.  His ongoing relationship with Parker-Bowles made him look out of touch with reality, yet the age spread between himself and Diana may have been the biggest problem between the two. They probably could not identify with each others generation. Prince William seems to be the odds on favorite for taking over the throne.  One has to wonder if Charles really wants the job anymore.  His mother could step down and let him have some of the glory, yet she chooses not to relinquish her authority.  I doubt that his marriage to Camille has helped his relationship with mum. So, he may be taking the path of the old Duke of Windsor, its not as though he needs the money.  William would be a fine choice as the next King of England.
307597
Yes. They would find a lovely title for her and put her in with the addled Queen Mum. Charles would then ascend, unfortunately. I don't think he has the nads for it , frankly. Young William, yes.
162214
Prince.\n\nOne s makes 'princes', 2 s's make 'princess'.
68717
while vanlen_15's list is quite impressive, i think i'll base my list on what sells like pancakes when they get on the headlines:\n1- princess di \n2- prince charles and camilla \n3- prince will\n4- the queen\n5- prince harry\n6- the beatles
82710
Men  Women \nDuke  Duchess \nMarquis (MAR-kwis)  Marchioness (MAR-shon-ess) \nEarl  Countess \nViscount (vEYE-count)  Viscountess (vEYE-count-ess) \nBaron  Baroness \nKnight  Knight's lady \n\n\nRoyalty refers only to the monarch and his/her immediate family. \n\nNobility refers to peers and their families.
183903
I felt sorry for all of them. Charles and Camilla are happy together and should have been allowed to marry years ago. Diana was never a suitable partner for a man like Charles and her was not for her. \n It is too bad that she's dead as I did admire her but I think that she would have been better off marrying some nice lord or viscount and jus getting on with a private life.
244365
For a girl..Baroness Mcnutt!! Makes me sound like a queen and its originating bc i am always in charge and i never listend to my parents..so they gave it to me..\nFor a man..Sneagle Beagle!Well my bro at age 14 snuck out all the time so when he would sneak back in my mother would always know and yell it as he was climbing back in bc he is sneaky but a beagle is loud so he was retarted to a point where my mom knew everytine he was doing it!