Do we need a Hitler or Mussolini....or shud we tolerate the false world police role played by BUSH and others.....
127841
Hitler wanted to rule the world and have everyone follow him like sheep! Without thinking what was right for the people. Bush is the same trying to have everyone believe he is not a liar! And a control Freak as Hitler was!! The world is now based on control over others and that is a sorry thing.
621740
I seem to remember reading that the early American colonists didn't much like the principle of taxation without representation. \n\nThe US role as "the world police" is purely self appointed and purely in the interests of protecting the American Empire, which has at it's heart the protection of the American economy and globalisation.\n\nIf you bother reading a slight amount of world history, you will see that the US used to complain about us Brits doing exactly the thing.
544995
It worries me too.Such a move would almost certainly turn an,at least apparently,lawful,democratic country into an abusive Police State.\nIf you are still looking for a really Gestapo-like approach to law and order,police abuse and horrendous abuses of human rights,Vote Rudy Giuliani in 2008!\n\n\n"Freedom is about authority.Freedom is about the will of every single human being to cede to lawful authority a great deal of discretion about what you do"\n                                                                    (Rudolph Giuliani)
240353
It's highly unlikely that you'll get the information you've asked for because opinion polling, statistical analysis and predictive modelling techniques weren't around then.  I'd suggest using the results of the elections after the war as a guide as well as empirical evidence from the time (newsreels, editorials etc.)\n\nOf course Messers Hitler, Stalin and Moussolini didn't really have to bother with 'approval' as they were totalitarian dictators.
24299
According to a just-released report commissioned by the Pentagon, we don't even have the resources to defeat the insurgency in Iraq.\nUnless you are willing to rule with the hand of a dictator, it is always necessary for effective policing to be shared. Even at the community level, police need the cooperation of residents to be effective.\nAt the international level, no country has the resouces to effectively police all of the hot spots.  This is why, in my view, it is shortsighted and unproductive to try to unilaterally police the world.
481011
we should hate anybody who is oppressed . they need to serve there great emperor Bush . because he said if you don't support me in what ever i do wrong or right then you will be supporting the terrorists. so do they have a choice?
665011
yes...in theory...it would require useing our nuclear arsensal and kill everyone on the planet not within our borders and then it would require a secret police and racial profiling concentration camps...\n\nit can be done.....only in thee extreme. i of course  believe in defeating them in various methods besides just tactical force....
470918
No. You may mean the Hitler types of racial dictatorship.
373539
of curse !\n\ncan anybody tell me difference beetwen Bush and Hitler ?\n\nsend me a mail\nthanks
16054
Well, winning World War II set the United States up to be a world power.  It also helped ushered in a great deal of long-overdue reforms in Europe, and today a European Federal Constitution is now a very real possibility.  Further still,  had Hitler succeeded, he would have undoubetly gone on to destroy the United States indescriminatently.  He would not have spared a single American, even those who resembled his ideal race, because they had grown up in a culture that was, in his eyes, dirty and corrupt (not to mention we were his sworn enemy).  This is one of the many instances in which money plays no role, so the 2.6 trillion figure you site is meaningless.  And even though the use of atomic weapons is still controversial, that alone does not aide your case 'was stopping _Hitler_ worth it.  I'm frankly shocked and appauled that someone could use their freedom of speech, something that wouldn't be enjoyed in a Hilter-ized America, in such a blatantly ridiculous manner.
360113
It's partly true, our most base instincts can lead us to perversion and even murder, as in 'The Lord of the Flies'.\nBut Freedom is essential because our leaders like G W Bush who would take away our freedoms from us are also sinners, and restricting the freedoms of the masses does not do away with those freedoms, but gives them to the Leader. Decisions are still made, but as more power is invested in fewer people we see historically and currently an increase in the perversity of the leaders. \nTake for instance sexual perversion in the Republican Party of the USA and the Sadism of Bush and his troops. Only by spreading freedom and therefore power out as broadly as possible among all people can those who would lead us into perversion, violence and corruption be kept in check.
366699
We should assemble a task force to take down our corrupt dictator. Down with Supreme ruler Walter Bush II!
390006
Hitler's government was Nazism or National Socialist. Fascism is the combining of corporations and government. So you could say we are heading towards fascism. Now before anybody attacks me for this answer, give me one law that has been passed by our government that benefits we the people not he benefit of corporations. Good luck on that!\nHere's a post that I had posted earlier on Yahoo answers. \n Lets look at the similarities between Bush and Hitler. Both were elected/selected, Bush by the Supreme Court and Hitler when Hindenburg died. They both had terrorist attacks on their country, Bush 9/11 and Hitler the Reichstag's fire. Both ignored warning of the impending attacks. Both have/had conspiracy theories about thier involvement. Both blamed foreign ideologues. Both made speeches right afterwords. Within weeks Bush had the Patriot Act and Hitler had his "Decree on the Protection of People and State". Both had a 4 year sunset provision put on them to get them passed. Both had protesters arrested or put in free speech zones away from the place where they were appearing. Both use the word Homeland to describe the nation. Both claim/claimed to be Christian. Both formed a new agency to consolidate various independent police, intelligence and border agencies together. Bush got Homeland Security and Hitler got the Central Security Office. Both have an SS, Bush has the Secret Service as a National Police Force and Hitler had the SchutzStaffel. Both had detention camps built. Both attacked coutries that hadn't attacked them. Both brought in industry and forged an alliance, and they got former executives of the nation's biggest companies into government positions. Both use government to empower corporations and reward the society's richest individuals, privatize much of the commons, stifle dissent, strip people of constitutional rights, and create an illusion of prosperity through continual and ever-expanding war. \nHistory seems to be repeating!
454115
Nato's Role before :\nprotection against the Warchau block.\nNato's role is quickly changing to a police force in UN missions.  \nAt this moment there are Belgian, British, Canadian, Dutch, French, German, Luxembourg, Tjech, US troops in Afghanistan under Nato command (I think also Spanish and Polish but I'm not certain of these).\nYes, Nato is certainly needed.
101053
I love this "GUY"! I am assuming that you most likely know something about the Confederacy. Isn't this a mirror of Robert E. LEE. Hitler most certainly looked at some of his strategies to promote suicidal troops with the Civil War. General Lee was also a graduate of West Point along with General Grant. This whole thing has been written before is my point. This ridiculous continuation of NEO-CONSERVATIVE policies as the Nazis that they are, is getting real old, and you know that it wont last. Keep up the Good Work, and don't let them abuse you.
341396
appeasment didnt work with hitler, and he was a anglo. these arabs are frigin stark ravin nuts. it's scary how people seem to make the same mistake again and again. when the poop hits the fan ; people will say ;oh no whats happening oh no...that liberal garbage is dangerous to our safety
645332
But it's OK, Saddam was our friend when Reagan put him in, right? Dictators are cool when they're on our side. The whole "freedom and peace worldwide" thing doesn't count when the dictators back our interests..\n</sarcasm>