Bakit ang island sa kalsada tinawag na island, wala namang tubig???
122875
Kasi  sa pinas laging bumabaha kaya that "isaland" is almost always surrounded by water also di ba.
97900
www.pinoycentral.com\nwww.abs-cbn.com\nwww.pinoybigbrother.com
403524
Maganda ang buhay / Ang buhay ay maganda - Tagalog
84000
Magandang umaga!  Dumaguite is a big place; there are probably a lot of women there named Rose.  Do you have her last name?
344224
well, i'm not fluent in tagalog and my phillipino friends are all asleep at this time but, u don't seem to have any answers yet so i will give it a try. \nAno ba yan..si pogi     I believe means   "what now handsome?"\nand yabang does mean (pride,arrogance and the verb to boast)\n\nit's now 6:30am in Philippines, give it a few more hours and try ur question on a filipino chat room...
574687
subukan mong maghanap sa mga bookstores around. siguro naman kaya mong i-summarized ang isang story kng naghahanap ka ng summarization ng biag ni lam-ang.
30277
It was there before it was an island.
569053
Raymond I am married to a filippino and will be in Manila for 5 weeks at christmas I could myself be interested in your idea, I will be at my house in Novaliches during my stay, I am hoping to find a new property during this period and would be willing to meet you and discus your ideas, king1dvd@yahoo.co.uk, regards David
214138
"Ang taong mapanira, siya ang malaki ang sala. Mas masakit ang sugat, na katha ng dila. Ang dungis ng iba, bago mo batiin, ang dungis mo muna ang iyong pahirin."\n\nA Culture that can offer the wise words as above as the Maharlika, how can the Filipinos be not proud of their own heritage?
38642
bermuda bahamas come on pretty mamma!!!!!!!!
658879
english, tagalog and one dialect (visaya) :)
604168
go to sanibell island
252712
If you really wanna learn Tagalog, just e-mail or IM me, I'll teach you\n\njdaza_03010@yahoo.com.ph\n\nI'm a Filipino girl.
255785
G.R. No. L-44678 April 8, 1986\n\nFRANCISCO BALIGWAT, petitioner, \nvs.\nHON. COURT OF APPEALS and ALBINO ESTAVOS, respondents.\n\nRamon P. Mabanag for petitioner. \n\nDulcisimo Tampus for private respondent. \n\n \n\nPATAJO, J.:\n\nIn this petition for review of the decision of the then Court of Appeals dated July 20, 1976, petitioner, the tenant of private respondent over 1 1/2 hectares land devoted exclusively to coconut trees, seeks a ruling from this Court that personal cultivation by the landowner, one of the grounds for the dispossession of a tenant under Section 50 of Republic Act 1199, otherwise known as the Agricultural Tenancy Act of the Philippines, had been repealed by Section 7 of Republic Act 6389, and that, therefore, he could not be ejected from the landholding in question on the alleged ground that the landowner wanted to cultivate the land himself personally. The decision of the Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the Court of Agrarian Reforms which denied the motion to dismiss filed by petitioner of the complaint to eject him from the landholding in question, said Court holding that Section 7 of Republic Act 6389 amending Section 36 of the Code of Agrarian Reforms of the Philippines, Republic Act 3844 deleting personal cultivation by the lessor-owner as ground for dispossessing the tenant-lessee does not apply to coconut lands. \n\nThe undisputed facts of this case is stated by the Court of Appeals in its decision subject of the present petition for review as follows: \n\nDefendant Francisco Baligwat is the tenant of plaintiff Albino Estavas over one and one-half hectares of his coconut land in Pualas, Tubod, Lanao del Norte, Estavas wanted to eject Baligwat because he wanted to cultivate the land personally, so he notified the defendant of his desire to personally cultivate the land one year before he filed this case on April 4, 1972 by sending a letter (Exhibit 'B') written on February 7, 1971, addressed to the defendant at Pualas, Tubod, Lanao del Norte. He mailed that letter by ordinary mail and the defendant received it through the Barrio Captain. He also complied with the requirements of law to inform the Court regarding his desire to personally cultivate the land as shown by a copy of the notice he filed in Court, (Exhibit 'C') received on February 15, 1971 (Exhibit 'C-l').\n\nAfter one year, he sent another letter to the defendant re-minding him that after February, 1972, the latter was to vacate the premises (Exhibit 'D'). Because the defendant did not vacate the premises, plaintiff filed his petition in this case on April 4, 1972 (Exhibit 'E'). \n\nEstavas wanted to personally cultivate the land because he had no job and he has had experience as farmer of the coconut land of his father. The entire area of the coconut land is 26 hectares. The tenanted area of the said land is one hectare and a half. Plaintiff has four children all of majority age, with children of their own. He wants to cultivate personally the area of one and a half hectares use the rest of the 26 hectares are cultivated by his children who are all farmers, including the only one of them who is employed and who visits the place every month. Four hectares of the land were acquired by his wife and the other portions were acquired by him and his wife. He has a house on the land in question. Three of his children have their own houses on the portions of land they are occupying and cultivating. \n\nWe are in full agreement with the holding of the Court of Appeals upholding the Court a quo that insofar as coconut lands are concerned, personal cultivation by the owner-lessor, a ground for dispossession of the tenant-lessee under Section 50 of Republic Act 1199, is still a valid ground for dispossession of a tenant. This is so because Section 35 of Republic Act 3844 expressly provides that with respect to lands principally planted to citrus, coconuts, cacao, durian and other similar permanent
491748
The Island. Do i win do i win?!?!
414970
sad to say that you married a filipina who is just using you . did you meet her there in the states or in the philippines ? if from the philippines then well........
592906
MAIKLING KUWENTO\n\nAng maikling kwento ay isang uri ng panitikang masining na naglalahad ng isang pangyayari. Ang maikling kwento, di tulad ng nobela'y hindi kahabaan, higit na kakaunti ang mga tauhan, mas mabilis ang paglalahad at higit na matipid sa paggamit ng pananalita.\n\nMGA BAHAGI AT SANGKAP NG MAIKLING KUWENTO:\n\n1.SIMULA\n\na.) Mga Tauhan -- dito nalalaman kung sinu-sino ang magsisiganap sa kuwento at kung ano ang papael na gaganapan ng bawat isa, maaring bida, kontrabida o suporta.\n\nb.) Tagpuan -- dito nakasaad ang lugar na pinangyayarihan ng mga aksyon o mga insidente gayundin ang panahon kung kailan naganap ang kuwento.\n\nc.) Suliranin -- kababasahan ng problemang haharapin ng pangunahing tauhan.\n\n2. GITNA\n\na.) Saglit na Kasiglahan -- naglalahad ng panandaliang pagtatagpo ng mga tauhang masasangkot sa suliranin.\n\nb.) Tunggalian -- bahaging kababasahan ng pakikitunggali ng pangunahing tauhan sa mga suliraning kakaharapin na minsa'y ang sarili, ang kapwa, o ang kalikasan.\n\nc.) Kasukdulan -- pinakamadulang bahagi kung saan makakamtan ng pangunahing tauhan ang katuparan o kasawian ng kanyang ipinaglalaban.\n\n3. WAKAS\n\na.) Kakalasan -- bahagingh nagpapakita ng unti-unting pagbaba ng takbo ng kuwento mula sa maigting na pangyayari sa kasukdulan.\n\nb.) Katapusan -- kababasahan ng magiging resolusyon ng kuwento. Maaring masaya o malungkot, pagkatalo o pagkapanalo.\n\nGayunpaman, may mga kuwento na hindi laging winawakasan sa dalawang huling nabanggitna sangkap. Minsan ay hinahayaan ng may-akda na mabitinang wakas ng kuwento at ang mambabasa ang hahatol o magpapasya kung ano sa palagay niya ang maaring kahihinatnan ng kuwento.\n\n\nSana'y nakatulong ang sagot na ibinigay ko sa iyo. If i'm not mistaken, you're looking for the tagalog/filipino version; so I won't translate it in english.