what is the difference between "may" and "might"
120294
Might is the subjunctive tense which implies less certainty.
335552
Well one was written in english, the other in latin. That's kind of a difference.
180768
They both mean the same thing but the second is more common.
528041
You use "be" with a conditional word like might, could, should, would.  \n\nExamples: We might be late.  We could be late.  We should be late.  We would be late.  \n\nYou also use "be" with a helping/auxiliary verb or with "to" which creates an infinitive.  Hamlet's quote "To be or not to be, that is the question" is one of the most famous uses of this.\n\nThere are some people in the northeast part of America (Yankees) who use "be" in their regional dialect, but this is not common at all.\n\nHope this helps.  Cheers, K (teacher for 14 years)
618418
Your second example is correct. Because 'holidays' are plural, that is, there is more than one holiday, your verb must agree. 'Are' is the correct form of 'to be' for use with plurals. \n\n"When are your summer holidays?" is the correct form of this sentence, and an educated native speaker of English would use this.
524623
They mean the same thing, although the first one is slightly more passive.  But you could use either one where you use the other.  Note that if someone wanted to be picky-tricky, they would say that the first one has more words and more letters than the second one, that's the only real difference.
555432
get is kind of like a demand word for a example: can you go get me a soda.  got is word when you use to somebody else to ask them do you have something
72347
a Thursday's yesterday is Wed.\n\nso, saying the first part differently:\n\n  "If the day after tomorrow's yesterday is Wed....."\n\nTommorow's yesterday is today.\n\nSo, revising the first part again:\n\n  "If the day after today is Wed......"\n\nSo "today" must be Tues.\n\n6 weeks and a day after Tuesday is a Wed.\n\nAnswer: WEDNESDAY\n\nAt least I explained it!
425558
Use of the "just would". The word just used in conjunction with would, creates a double predicate, which is grammatically incorrect. \n\nDarryl S.
590613
One. It just requires a question mark at the end! It's OK apart from that, although as others have said, there are other ways of saying it..! The tense is fine though!\n\nTwo. The second 'travel to London' is redundant - not necessary. I'd replace it with 'go'!! AND, as you would be travelling to London WITH Helen, I'd say 'we' instead of 'I'!\n"If Helen had invited me to travel to London with her, we would go tomorrow."
464318
no rule. they dont have to differ in syntax level. its your choice.
246488
Both are same but the voice is different. Second one is in passive voice and sounds more formal.
464753
So we know when to use the number '2' and the word 'to'.\nThey are different, and have different meanings. If someone read your question as you wrote it, it would make no sense. So, go to school, and pay attention in English class.
413377
gotta means got to or have to. gonna means going to. They are kinds of slang.
132223
have to\nThe verb phrases have to and have got to express necessity and obligation. They differ subtly in meaning from the auxiliary verb must. While all of these verbs can be used to express a command or warning (You have got to leave now. You must not shout), have to and have got to are somewhat more forceful than must in expressing necessity. There has (or has got) to be some mistake conveys a bit more emphasis than There must be some mistake. Only have to can form verb phrases with may, be, and have. We can say I may have to go but not I may have got to go. We can say You are having to do a lot more work these days but not You are having got to … We can say The town has had to repave its main road but not The town has had got to … In spoken English people often drop the have from have got to, as in We got to get up early. But in formal writing got to is not ordinarily considered acceptable.\n\nmust\nThe auxiliary verb must is used to express necessity, obligation, and probability: Plants must have water in order to live. Swimmers must take a shower before entering the pool. You must be joking. Unlike other auxiliaries like can and may, must has no past form like could or might: They insisted we must wait until tomorrow. In this regard must resembles need and ought to.
100056
none except\nmajors are longer, minors are shorter\nall GOD'S WORD is very important-vs by vs-chapter by chapter, choosing subject and object.  know more. contact me.
184706
8 Months in May!\nCongrats by the way on your aniv... 11 years is a long time in this day.