which one is an incorrect conclusion from the experiment?\n1:management is responsible for the system \n2:day to day variation of a Willing Worker came entirely from the process itself \n3:special cause variation can be predicted \n4:numerical goals are often meaningless
130845
the correct answer should be # 2 because the main point of the experiment is that "the same steps don't always produce the same results"
68539
ZERO\n\nand ironically not everything is true, you have to study it and find out for yourself
163683
crtical thinking [reasoning n judgement]\nlymbic system control [control of adrenaline etc.]\nimpulse control\nmemory \nplanning\n\nhope this helped!
77839
Hi,\n\nI have recently come across this in the statistics part of my engineering degree. \nA control group is basically a test group to whom you would give a placebo, in medical tests at leats.\n\nIn engineering tests, you would collect data / numbers from one group to whom no change was made ( the control group ) then you would test another group on whom  a change was made. This reduces errors caused by randomisation. \n\nI found one site that gives basic statistical definitions below. They wont help figure out how to test the control group but they may help you decide how many groups and what size they need to be to test your hypothesis\n\nhttp://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/home.ubalt.edu/ntsbarsh/Business-stat/opre504.htm#rtestothercl
203841
The first three sites I looked at all seem to indicate that project crashing is a way to reduce the overall duration of a project. \n\nThey all suggest reducing the planned duration of one or more tasks that are on the critical path (Since there's no sense in looking at tasks that aren't on the critical path). \n\nReduction of duration means increasing resources (more people or equipment or overtime hours). This implies that the original assumptions made when planning were based on minimising costs rather than duration. \n\nAll the techniques then went into mathematical models that I didn't analyse in detail but could see that all were trying to optimise [minimal] costs vs. [maximal] reduction in project duration.
413491
I would add Conclusions, and suggest the following order: Hypothesis, Experiment purpose & design, Materials, Procedure, Results, Analysis & Experimental error, Conclusions. Whether 2 pix & 2 graphs are enough depends on how much data must be presented. Summarize and interpret data if possible, and maybe show only a portion if data are complex and take too much space. If pix are not obvious, mark them to show their points of interest. Title all pix and graphs. Good luck. There's no business like show business!
199791
A quotation by Harvey J Gold, Author of Mathematical Modelling of Biological Systems,  may go towards assisting your analysis of the situation:\n\n" The result of a mathematical development should be continuously checked against one's own intuition about what constitutes reasonable biological behaviour. Whenever such a check reveals disagreement, the following possibilities must be considered:\n\na : A mistake has been made in the formal mathematical development\n\nb: The starting assumptions are incorrect and/or constitute a too drastic oversimplification\n\nc: One's own intuition about the biological field is inadequately developed.\n\nd: A penetrating new principle has been discovered. "\n\nDo let me know whether you found meaning in the above, and if you did analyse your model based on the checks recommended by him, what among a,b,c,d was the reason of the discrepancy. Of course this is assuming that you have already established the discrepancy beyond doubt.
371268
a\n\nWhy the others fail:\nb. there is no mechanism other than eradication of life to stop it\nc. all creatures evolve and life isn't rare\nd. laboratory demonstrations are akin to a bucket full in an ocean.\ne. generation times aren't the same for different creatures
514311
There are many schools on management theory and it is you who are being asked to answer that question for your homework and it is only you opinion that matters here - not ours.\n\nGood Luck!!!
36084
Analygous estimating - ie using previous tasks of a similar nature to guide your estimate\nParametric estimating - where you estimate based on a rate eg. it take $100 to create one widget, so it will take $500 to produce 5 widgets\n\nThe project manager should be the one who faciliates the cost estimating at a task level and then consolidates the information to produce an overall project budget.  The project manager might also produce a top-down estimate based on actual project costs from previous projects.
603292
Contingency Perspective\n\nA view that proposes that there is no one best approach to management for all situations \nAsserts that managers are responsible for determining wich managerial approach is likely to be most effective in a given situation \nThis requires managers to identify the key contingencies in a given situation.
89505
A is correct, if you ignore "manmade satellites"\nB,C,D are wrong as said by carbon based
403260
Deductive.\n\nWhen you know a rule and apply it to a situation, you are DEDUCING the solution in that situation.\n\nThe other type of reasoning is inductive.\nWhen you observe many examples of a particular behavior (or relationship, or whatever), you may conclude INDUCTIVELY that it will occur in ALL situations. (But of course you can't be SURE that it will. Your degree of confidence is based on the number of situations in which you have seen it happen, and the fact that you have never seen it NOT happen.)
210605
I believe Management Summary is similar to Executive Summary, so see Source# 1. You can also find some examples there.\n\nRe Scope, not quite sure, but it should be about what you are going to do for the company. Like you said, 'duscussing effects of staff downsizing,... .' \n\nObjectives should be something that you have to find out (and be able to give the correlative findings, outcomes, result in the summary part at the end of the report). Why do you ahve to discuss about the effects...? \n\nI think this should be it!\n\nI cannot find the info from the Internet, so perhaps you want to try a library. Finding some examples of reports, theses, etc.. and see what they put in it.
272143
context?\n\nI know it as Manufacturing Resource Planning, and Enterprise Resource Planning.... what are you talking about?
223100
The controlled parameter is the one thing that does not change in the experiment. So as others have mentioned, the answer is B.
249945
First: Pay attention in class, this is stuff they teach in 7th grade. \n\nSecond: the answer is likely A because that's what the experimenter is 'controlling' but it's a very poorly worded question. The common verbage used is 'dependant' or 'independant' variables. \n\nI'm assuming that your teacher is either ignorant or very mean. Either way, my condolences.