example of non-functional requirements in software engieering
128129
non functional requirements in software engineering are like \n\n- performance , maintainability , ease of use\n\ni.e :\n\nease of use : does ur software provide a nice interface and easy to navigate or not \n\nmaintainability : does ur software maintainable like it can be upgraded or updated easily \n\nand so on
460118
The systems that I supply work, and they are turnkey.\n\nYou problem has to do more with management of the situtation, and not suo much a technical problem. If you are buying a system that is not completely "turn-key", then what you are saying is that you are an integrator of a subsystem.\n\nSo for an acceptence of the subsystem, you have to define an acceptence criteria and test to that criteria, that establishes that the requirements of the subsystem are satified, i. e. when you plug it into the rest of your system, it plays and interfaces as advertised.\n\nDepending on the cleaves or control volumes in your system, you may not be able to function test subsystems. This can be a recipe for disaster - the last guy who touches the system is presumed to be at fault.\n\nIf you need help with the development of acceptence testing or plans - email me; info@haysengineering.com. We have become experts at this sort of thing, based on our products and clients. We could assist you and act as a proxy for you to clean this type of thing up.\n\nIf these wounds are self-inflicted by some manager or authority within your own organization, then I am sorry. Those kind of problems are very difficult to fix.\n\nYou are on the right track - you need a better definition of "turnkey". You should hold your vendor responsible to an acceptence test, and you should make that test be as "functional" (as opposed to "dimensional", for example) as possible.
89968
ummmmm.....what is it that you're trying to engineer?  cars, trains, software, buildings?
33774
tuturials and example open source codes that are unstandable, reference sites like javascriptsource.com or bravenet.com dynamic html sites, etc..
97092
details, details\n\nI'm a Senior Software Engineer
67991
try to look for it on sourceforge.net.\nsome other useful resources can be codeguru and codeproject
180116
I can help you out. I'm a professional sw engineer &#92; architect. I've built solutions for small & large companies including SAP, Pfizer, Aramark & Bristol Myers Squibb. \n\ngood luck with your project
573540
what do you need inaserco, is it a service related problem
67506
I have worked on four Software Engineering projects in the last year, three of which used Extreme Programming techniques.\n\nAs an engineer/developer and not a documenter, I found it to be fast and refreshing to develop in this way - we were able to get a lot more done in the same amount of time and we were always working on development.\n\nDown sides? We seemed to have to do more change requests working like this - my only guess would be that we had implemented more features before people changed their minds they we would normally have done.\n\nThe biggest down side is that the people I was working with used less comments than usual, which doesn't help because we were documenting less.\n\nI think experimenting with the different concepts in your team would definitely weild some positive experiences.\nThe company I've worked for use EP in all the projects it's conceivable to do so.\n\nI find it much easier to work like this, coding seems a lot less restricted (can't explain much better than that); but you have to keep a closer eye on the quality of code (and have a good project management tool for feature and bug tracking)\n\nHope that helps a little - it's difficult to explain how it changes things until you give it a try
487057
Using lines of code to measure a programmers productivity is completely invalid.\nThe statement that the best programmers use the least amount of code is also inaccurate.   Sometimes the least amount of code can make applications cryptic and difficult to maintain.
383847
There is usually another step in the process - product readiness - it's a separate group of people / different dept.  Prevents those crazy QA guys and gals from taking over the world :)
197608
Software programming.
589693
A monumental task!\nHope yur not the sole programmer.\nI recommend staying with standard C or Cobol\nA comprehensive telecom billing system will atke you years to write.
364008
Could you give a few examples please?
463467
you go to a programmer and say 'i need a piece of software that does this or that because there's isn't already a software which can do it they way i want - can you write something to do that for me?', when the programmer writes that software for you, it's custom written software. software written specifically at your request.
280463
I am lil annoyed because i am not able to solve a problem that occured with an interface..i am a software programmer..its something silly but i am not able to put my finger on..\nBut i will do it and even tho i am annoyed the smile hasnt left my face..u too dont let it slip away:)
269133
testing is that this software contain any error or not.\n\nbut Quality Center always looks that this software Work's Fine , Faster & also on given requiremens or not.