What is linux file system?And what are the types of linux file system?\n\nplz..list a websites if you can..\n\nthank u\n:)
120183
Here are the filesystems I saw:\n\n1. Journaling the Linux ext2fs filesystem (postscript: ps.gz) - by Stephen C. Tweedie \n2. EXT3 - Stephen Tweedie's journalling version of the ext2 \n3. Reiser FS - [Howto] \n4. SGI XFS - Linux 2.4+ kernel only. Note: SGI just released CXFS (Clustered XFS - commercial product.) \n5. IBM JFS: \n6. StegFS: Steganographic File System for Linux - encrypt data, hides data such that it cannot be proven to be there. \n7. Transparent Cryptographic Filesystem Project \n8. VERITAS: \nVERITAS Cluster Server \nVERITAS: Filesystem Whitepaper - (pdf) - Veritas VxVM is a commercial filesystem product \nVeritas Linux performance claims \n9. Legato - Commercial Storage Area Network (SAN) Software/Hardware \n10. LinLogFS -- A Log-Structured Filesystem For Linux\n\nAll links are from the HTML source below:
461565
Linux is a very nice operating system.  It's used extensively by businesses as well as hobbyists, both of which also contribute to development.  Windows works best for most people because we are stuck with it, but Linux is like saying "if you could give up compatibility in order to design an operating system the right way, what would you make..."  In many ways, it's a computer programmer's "dream" system.\n\nTrue, Linux is less compatible than Windows, but it gets more popular every day, and nowadays you can do stuff with it that you could never do when I started using it.  It works on more different kinds of computer than Windows does, and it can even run some Windows apps natively (all Windows apps work if you use a virtual machine, but they run slowly).\n\nThink of Linux as a custom, designer system.  It's made by people who are picky and have a lot of preference when it comes to systems.  If your needs are like theirs, it will be right for you.  If not, then it isn't right for you.\n\nAlso, one last important detail is that Linux is Free software.  I don't mean to say that you can get it without paying (you can pay people to get it, but that's not required to have it), but actually Linux is software that respects your freedom to use the software for your own needs as well as to adapt it to whatever use you want--there are no legal sanctions against you.  Software like Windows is licensed with heavy restrictions on how you are allowed to use it.  Most people think this is no big deal, but thousands of people are breaking the law by violating a license they don't even know about!\n\nIf you are interested in the politics of Free software, I encourage you to read up on it.  If you don't care about the big picture, take it or leave it for what it is.\n\nPS (I put Linux on my girlfriend's laptop, and she absolutely adores it.  She is no computer expert, and is also used to Windows, but she has no trouble using it, and is very pleased that her computer runs faster and is more reliable.  Just make sure your husband knows FOR SURE what he is doing and understands that Linux is really right for you.)
327097
My take on the article is that the writer is speculating that Google uses a huge computer running its own OS.  If you read the article I cite in the source, it makes more sense.  Google has devised their own file system, but the operating system they use in their data center is a version of Linux.  So, is it a completely new OS?  Doesn't sound like it.
400639
I can make duplicates of my Linux DVDs, and, if I have a movie that the children want to watch, I can make a copy that they can destroy, like children usually do.\n\nAll software should be duplicated, and the original stored in a safe place, the 'daughter' disc placed in the open storage stack, and the other 'daughter' disc can be used and abused, until worn out from handling...\n\nSo, to do all of that, I like two DVD optical drives, one reader, one writer, or dual writers.  And, in Linux, I can burn, surf, run a program, run frostwire, play music all at the same time, on some of the 20 desktops on my 1 Ghz unit!
228054
* You can boot different operating systems on the partition.\n* They can be different file system types.\n* You can put your swap space on a different partition from the system files for performance (although a different disk would perform better)
94439
(m)\n\nRubix Linux \n\nRubix Linux is a Linux distribution that was originally derived from Slackware. It is designed to support mission critical hardware and be very admin friendly.\n\nRubyx \n\nRubyx is a Gnu/Linux based operating system, built and maintained by rubyx, a simple script written in the ruby language. The rubyx script is small, but very capable. It can download and build the entire os from source to your exact specifications, handles all subsequent package management and can even create a bootable iso image
352467
Linux is a free operating system that was developed by Linus Trovalds. It is different from UNIX In fact, one of the reasons that it exists is that Linus needed a working UNIX platform but didn't want to pay the huge license fee. You'll find that most things in linux work the same way as they used to in Unix.\n\nAs for your other questions,\nYes, you can use Xandros off a live cd. However, Ubuntu comes with a live cd too and you can expect better support for Ubuntu than for Xandros. \n\nAnd yes, you can access your USB hard drive without any problem from linux.\n\nYou can download Ubuntu's Live cd here :- \n\nhttp://ftp.wwc.edu/pub/mirrors/ubuntu-releases/edgy/ubuntu-6.10-desktop-i386.iso
436045
There is also Linux, both Linux and BSD flavors are based on Unix.  Linux and BSD do have difference, though.  Whichever, one of the best ways to get started is to look around the local library for books on beginner's Linux and/or Unix --Unix, because BSD is more strict to Unix.\n\nNow, as far as the actual OS... for Linux my two choice for ease of installation, compatibility, and usability are Fedora and Ubuntu.  For BSD, the best experience I've had was with OpenBSD, which does need a bit more fiddling with than Fedora or Ubuntu, and there's FreeBSD, like you've said you're interested in, but I didn't have a good experience installing that.  OpenBSD is an extremely secure system --more so than the two Linux versions I've mentioned, so maybe you'd rather take the extra trouble... and maybe not.  I didn't have the patience and finally decided I'd go with Ubuntu.  FreeBSD is less secure than OpenBSD and needs a bit of fiddling with as well, but like I said, I didn't have a good experience with it.  Too much fiddling --more than I needed to do with OpenBSD.\n\nhttp://www.redhat.com/fedora/\nhttp://www.ubuntu.com/ <--there are also two other versions listed there you might want to look into\nhttp://www.openbsd.org/\nhttp://www.freebsd.org/\n\nJust download the ISOs, burn them as ISOs to CD, and they should boot up for you.  Installation is normally pretty automated, but OpenBSD is a little more cumbersome, so be careful and make sure you've an installation manual handy.  Having another computer available to online with while you're installing onto another computer is a good convenience.  I haven't experienced Fedora, but Ubuntu automatically installs a desktop environment for you, so it might be the easiest for you to learn from.
462088
You said this was an easy question,\nLIAR, lol:)\n\nMy computer mispalces files too, the best advise is poke around till you find it.\n\nI hope someone who is more computer literate helps you. Sorry, technology doesn't like me.
293239
linux lacks the basic third party support of windows and it isn't easy to use but it is free...\n\n\nwindows is a massive uncaring corporate piec of software crap with huge security issues and nothing is ever free with windows....i personally think mac is the way to go...
106630
ReiserFS 25% Space Savings vs. ext3\n\nNavindra Umanee has an interesting comparison between the ext3 and ReiserFS file systems on Linux. With a large number of directories and [I am assuming] mostly small to medium sized files, ReiserFS used roughly 25% less space than ext3, and it was considerably faster.\n\nThe space savings are similar to my own results, when I was looking for the most efficient file system to set up a server with limited disk space, for mail- and web file storage. Since then I have been running ReiserFS on several different systems without any problems. Check it out, if you haven’t already.
108302
The best thing is to download and install it on your own and work on it, not book require, there is too much LINUX information on the web, after all LINUX is open source and so is everything that you need to learn it.\n\nSUSE Linux is really good.\nRED HAT Linux is the most popular one though.
499421
I would recommend Directory Opus v8, I've been using this program for a long time.\n# Powerful File Manager & Explorer Replacement\n# User-definable File Display Views\n# User-definable Toolbars, Menus, File Types\n# Advanced built-in Image and File Viewers\n# Built-in ZIP and Advanced FTP\n# Visually Synchronize Files & Find Duplicates\n# Advanced Search and Rename Functions\n# More Configurable than any other program\n\nget free trial here\nhttp://www.gpsoft.com.au/
546763
if you use winrar to open a file..you must open the first one, and it will open all of them and put them together for you, you normally know you did it right becuz it will take  longer than a couple seconds to put together 1 gig..lol, but yea once you do that you should be ok
497906
there are a tonne of them, but because they're not as big as the ones you mentioned they probably wouldn't be of use as a main operating system because the support/compatibility isn't there:\nhttp://www.freebyte.com/operatingsystems/\n\ntake your pick from just about 100 of them on that page alone!
50129
All I know is that people are putting linux on everything these days, why can't you just leave it on your computers?!?!?!?!?!
13789
Here is a link that contains a listing of 50 free online storage providers with details like File Size Limit, Download Limit and\nFile Life.\n\nhttp://www.jdempsey.com/2005/12/08/free-online-file-storagesending/