Rather than the Earth that's rotating under the stars?
130138
The Coriolis effect. If the Earth were not rotating, the effect would be a mysterious "fifth force" with no physical explanation. See the source for details. \nAccelerating frames are absolutely determined. The above references to relativity theory are completely incorrect; Newtonian theory equates frames with constant velocity, Einstein equates an accelerating frame with a local curvature (gravitation). This is all the two theories have to do with the badly referenced quotations above.\nThe amount of pseudoscience and bad science on these forums is strange, given the amount of knowledge freely available over the internet.
371118
because the earth rotates on an axis
334494
They actually do, but as previously stated the moon is much less massive than the Earth so we don't rotate as much compared to the moon. \n\nIncidentally: the Moon is not rotating around the Earth in a strict sense, it's actually spiraling away at about one inch per year, eventually the Moon will escape orbit. Just FYI.
205658
everything in this universe moves. stars are parts of galaxies. for example our sun is a part of the milky way galaxy. we are in the sagittarius arm of our galaxy which rotates about its centre and as we are in one of the outer arms as the galaxy seems to rotate the sun along with its nine planets revolves around the centre of the galaxy. this is exactly what happens in other stars and star systems. secondly  all stars are round not to mention, every heavenly body is round because gravity makes them round. and the shape we concieve is just because of the phenomenon of scattering of light as the light from the stars passes through various layers of the atmospheres of different densities
639405
because the mass of sun is higher than all the other planets ...Moon has a smaller mass compared to earth so it revolves around the earth ...actually it's all 'relative' ...Motion is relative ...if you are driving in the car ...you can say the whole world is moving backwards ....we don't say that ...beacuse of the frame of reference ...we have chosen i.e. "the driver" also the complexity of the motion ....involved when looking at the world the other way....similarly you can say that sun is revolvin the planets but in the frame of reference the motion would be very complex ....so we choose the easier frame of reference ....alo the whole galaxy is rotating ...if you look from the outside frame of reference ....\n\n\nMOTION HAS A DUALITY ....NEVER A SINGULARITY ....
396184
No.  The reason is a bit complex for someone not already familiar with the conservation of rotational inertia.  But the short answer is that Jupiter is probably moving very, very slowly away from the Sun.  Our moon is moving very, very slowly away from the Earth.  Each body that has satellites has what is called a "Roche limit".  Jupiter and Earth would be outside of the Sun's Roche limit so they will move slowly farther away.  Our moon is outside Earth's Roche limit and will move slowly farther away.   Mars is pretty cool.  Mars has 2 very small moons.  One, Diemos, is farther away from Mars and outside its Roche limit.  It will also continue to move farther away ever so slowly.  But the other moon, Phobos, is a bit closer and inside of Mars' Roche limit.  It will ever so slowly move closer to Mars until it spirals down and eventually collides.  COOL, huh?
295952
It's relative to the plane of the Earth's orbit around the Sun, called the Ecliptic.
132499
Yes, it would be more accurate, but the calculations are much harder. Whether it is worth it depends on what you have to do with the information. One thing that happens is 'frame dragging', where a rotating mass drags along space and time with the rotation. We now have a probe in orbit around the earth to measure exactly this phenomenon.
234396
The Earth is not Hollow. Below the 60 Km crust is the semi-liquid Mantle. The core at the center is Solid.
662222
Because the sun does rise in the east and set in the west.  \n\nWe do know now that the reason is not because the sun is revolving around the earth, but because the earth spins on its axis.
568091
Earth also called as blue planet.Sorry i don't astrology name of the earth.
14209
Okay, first of all, the moon nor the sun are planets.  The first answer should sum it up.
184174
this shouldn't be in astronomy, it should be in astrology, that's hora-scopes not space
561117
If you mean on it's axis...no.  We're pretty small. Like ants building ant hills on an Island. BUT.......  We are digging and delving and pulling from the earth many elements and resources that will eventually cause some degree of irreplaceable loss. Whether this will totally upset the planet's inner workings or not can only be told over time. But aren't we seeing some very strange things happening these days?  Maybe it's all cyclical or maybe we are partially to blame.  Why chance it.  Best example is obvious.....stop using fossil fuels.
306887
There are already globes with a circling moon. Or you can use a wheel with the Earth at the hub and the moon on the rim the sun can be fixed so a lamp will work. From the top, North, the Earth circles the sun counter-clockwise and the moon circles the Earth counter-clockwise.
591784
Through the study of other stars 'wobble' within our own galaxy, we have detected planets larger than Jupiter, we believe.  Though, this is through a calculation with the doppler effect.  So to play it safe, as far as we know now it is Jupiter.  But to say that this will always be true would be bold and naive.
135621
This would be called astronomy.  Astrology is not science, while astronomy is.  You should go the place with the least people.