The project neeed to be one thing vs. another. \n(ex. which grows better:the plant in the window seal or the plant on the table) It need to relate to biology.
128045
The one you mentioned is a good one. What about eggs grown under heat and eggs grown in a blanket and which one hatches. I won the science fair with this one. It's very original.
357254
Actually, I have no idea what the question is. But I was going to say a cactus which has needles, but the other guy is better with pine b/c pine needles is more normal, I think.
155047
I think I understand the assignment. You need to build a formula the captures all the possibilities. (i.e wall in front, wall in front and behind, wall in front and to the right, etc)\n\nIt may be quite a little formula! Use help to understand the following formulas: AND, OR, CHOOSE, IF, NOT. Using a combination of nested in IF or CHOOSE statements would work.
113477
my suggestion is to use the letter A for old projects and the letter B for new ones.  For example, you could have A12345 and B12345. You would know that A means that is an old project and B is the new one.  Using only numbers would be more confusing because you have to remember what numbers belong to what, but with letters you just know by looking at it...
488119
Trilateral Project 24.1 - Biotechnology\n \nComparative Study on Biotechnology Patent Practices\n \nComparative Study Report\n\n\n\nContents\n\n\nForeword\n\n1. Requirements for Disclosure and Claims\n\nGeneral\n\n1.1 Claims\n\n1.1.1 Clarity of Claims\n\n1.1.1.1 General rules\n\n1.1.1.2 Details\n\n1.1.1.2.1 Structural gene\n\n1.1.1.2.2 Recombinant protein : Protein as obtained by using recombinant DNA technology\n\n1.1.1.2.3 DNAs, other than structural gene\n\n1.1.1.2.4 Transformant, Fused cell\n\n1.1.2 Relationship between Claims and Description of the Invention\n\n1.2 Description of the invention\n\n1.2.1 Enablement Requirement (Adequacy of Disclosure)\n\n1.2.1.1 General rules\n\n1.2.1.2 Details\n\n1.2.2 Deposition\n\n2. Patentability\n\n2.1 Industrial Applicability (Utility)\n\n2.2 Novelty\n\n2.3 Inventive step (Non-obviousness)\n\n3. Unity of Invention\n\n4. Amendment\n\n4.1 Amendment of DNA/amino acid sequence\n\n4.2 Addition or Conversion of deposit number\n\n5. Patentable subject matters\n \n \n\nForeword\n\nIn the beginning, the JPO notices that the JPO explains relevant provisions and practices mainly on the basis of 1994-Revised Patent Law (applicable to applications filed on and after 1995.7.1.)\n\nEPO JPO USPTO\n\n1. Requirements for Disclosure and Claims\n\nGeneral\n\nThe three Offices explain the reasons for rejection.\n\nThe USPTO explains, based on the Patent Act, Sections 101, 102, 103 and 112.\n\nThe EPO shows all the reasons, including the substantive requirements for disclosure and claims. On the other hand, the JPO explains in detail the requirements for disclosure and claims.\n\nEPO JPO USPTO\n\n1.1 Claims\n\n1.1.1 Clarity of Claims\n\n1.1.1.1 General rules\n\n(1) Is it allowed that a claim is defined only by the objective to be reached ?\n\nIf they can, how should such a claim be interpreted ?\n\nShould such a claim be called a "single-means" claim ?\n\nThe three Offices point out that a claim defined only by the objective to be reached has problems in the light of clarity of claims and of enabling disclosure.\n\nThe USPTO states that a claim may not be defined only by the objective to be reached because it would not be commensurate in scope with the enabling disclosure.\n\nThe EPO states that the scope of a claim must be clearly and unambiguously defined and in general, claims which attempt to define the invention by a result to be achieved are not allowed, in particular if they only amount to claiming the underlying problem, in other words the result to be achieved, however, claims worded in terms of functional features may be allowed if the invention either can only be defined in such terms or cannot otherwise be defined more precisely without unduly restricting the scope of the claims and if the result is one which can be directly and positively verified by tests or procedures adequately specified in the description or known to the person skilled in the art and which do not require undue experimentation.\n\nIn the JPO, a patent application shall not be rejected on the ground of the lack of clarity of claims merely because a claim includes a statement defining a product only by the objective to be reached, however, it is the lack of clarity of claims, if a claimed invention cannot be clearly identified by a skilled person as a result of such claim statements, particularly, if the extent of the claimed invention is unclear to a skilled person even taking into account the specification, drawings and common general knowledge as of the filing.\n\nEPO JPO USPTO\n\n(2) Is it allowed to use a result to be achieved as one of the elements (technical features) of the claimed invention in combination with the other elements (technical features) ?\n\nDoes the judgement depend on whether such an element is known to the public as of filing ?\n\nShould such claim be called a "means-plus-function" claim ?\n\nThe three Offices allow to use a result to be achieved as one of the elements (technical f
262048
id say the plants and animals are multi-celled and the others are single-celled. also cell specilization could be a difference.
540300
A goal is something that must be constructed or developed though a  thought process. Evolution does not have the ability to think.
52169
Fix the goal,\nEfficient plan,\ngood use of labour,\nInteraction with the users and goes on...\n\nAcc. to my teacher s/w engg. is not an engg.....It's an art!!!!!!
77822
Hi!\nI change my field of study from physics to biophysics but still its a great pleasure to solve a problem in physics if you dont mind.\nWish to see your project.\nBye
356835
Okay, so exactly what have you figuring to start with though? Didn't you say that you were going to work with the ONE campaign?\n\nI'd say, research all about it. Express ONE if you want for your project. Explain the issues going out in the world and what we KIDS can do or what the whole SCHOOL can do to help. If possible, get a video on it to present to the class. & etc...
280931
I'm also doing an environmental project (school). I found lots of interesting stuff by asking the people around here. Try that but don't say it's your homework or something.
593775
There are different aspects and tools used with Six Sigma.  It may be a Lean project of a Design for Six Sigma.  Ceck out the link for some good info.
586076
have u got a project from school?\nwhich school you're in?
170112
single case study is more focused on one type of thesis study
363335
It's called genotype by environment interaction and it's one of the most important principles of genetics.  You really can't say what genetics are "best" without considering the environment and vice versa.  So in short, neither is better, they work together.
665675
these days tools use for control and monitoring the project is microsoft project \nsoftware is powerfull for management decision is learning a better english
210356
NONE.  All things were created!  Things adapt to changing environments, but they never turn into something entirely new.