I have induction bending machine , after bending the pipes the yield drop too much and after heat treatment may be increased but not to the normal values before bending
122318
Decreasing the temp at which you are doing the bending will also help YS, although it's a tricky thing to find the lowest temp that you can still bend effectivley at.  Also, if you are annealing the pipe after bending then a drop in YS is a normal result.  To maintain a finer grain structure, and along with it the YS, make sure the pipe is held at a high temp for as short of a time as possible to avoid recovery.
351952
Your material is moving while you cut it. You are setting up a "wave", which you push with your cutter. The point at which the cutter rolls "over" the wave is the point you are seeing as run-out.\n\nIf you would like, a print would be helpful in determining a solution. It is counter-intuitive, but taking a bigger bite during your cut might help; if you are taking too small a depth of cut, your cutters may be trying to grind, rather than truly cut. This will cause the problem you are seeing. Also, if you can adjust the rake of the cutter, this will help. You want a positive rake here.\n\ninfo@HaysEngineering.com for more detailed help.
232468
Not a real problem if you don't dig too deep. Quiet often, back in the days when I repaired speakers, the connection from the voice coil to the speaker contact wires would break from vibration. Un-winding just enough of the wire (coil) to re-do the connection saved many an expensive speaker.
620338
I think it is B, too.\n\nAnswer a) & c) will increase the resistance. Decrease diameter will make the "path" much narrow. Increase length will make the path much longer.\nAnswer d) could increase or decrease the resistance\nAnswer b) is the only answer for sure to reduce the resistance
672207
There are some heat treatments or annealing things they do with plastics that may change its strength.
321959
Hehe, the utility company inspector will be pretty mad at you the next time he comes around.  I assume from your description that a 220->9V transformer is installed before the meter, but then a 9->220V transformer is placed after the meter to get the voltage back up to normal for your home.  Is this right?\n\nThe step-down transformer will not slow down your meter (there is no free lunch in power consumption).  What will happen is that at the 9V side of the transformer, you will have about 24.5 times the amount of current under the normal setup.\n\nMost meters have coils that sense the voltage and current and mechanically sum up the power.  So, you would be dropping the voltage but raising the current in the same proportion (the power readings will be close to the same as if you left things alone).\n\nPractically, the meter might be damaged since it was probably not designed to handle the higher current and lower voltage.  Also if the transformers you install are not rated correctly, bad things will happen.  The transformers you will need will likely cost a whole lot.  Finally, your meter might actually speed up a little since the transformer after the meter will certainly have some power losses associated with it.\n\nTo sum it up: not a good idea.
527315
The amount of heat generated will be a function of the resistance of the load on the source, and the surdface area of the plates.  If you have a connected load of high resistance, not much heat will be generated.  If you are short circuiting a 230 volt source capable of supplying high current, I predict you could generate enough heat to produce steam.
290922
Use the biaxial bending provisions for columns.  If you want to make the math easy, give it a small unit axial load.  You used to have to do this in steel, too.
572437
The power output is smaller than the power input as most of the energy usually has been converted to heat in the process...
966
The PD will decrease as the current passing through it will drop due to current division
227652
Dissipation in a yield line\nIf the axes of rotation for two slab parts are not at the same depth measured from the slab surface,\nthe relative displacement discontinuity is no longer perpendicular to the yield line. The angle\nbetween the displacement discontinuity and the yield line changes with the depth from the slab\nsurface and this must be taken into account when calculating the dissipation.\n\nAnd you will find more from this book.
580394
Simply that during the induction period, the actual concentrations may not be 100% homogeneous and the rates will increase of decrease from theoretical.  This is much more important with macromolecules, but can be seen in other cases.  See\n\nwww.uem.mz/faculdade/ciencias/ ciencias_revista/textos/elalves.pdf\n\ndx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1954769\n\nwww.platinummetalsreview.com/ dynamic/article/view/50-2-54-63\n\nwww.citadel.edu/chemistry/scas2005.pdf
526292
EDIT: Note additional comment.\n\nWhether you can use a potentiometer depends on the torque availble to turn the shaft.  I would say that in most cases a potentiometer would not react fast enough.  A variable capacitor could work if you could make it small enough and with low friction.  It would help if you gave more information on what exactly you want to measure.\n\n\nEDIT: ADDED COMMENT:\n\nAfter reading your additional explanation, a potentiometer would be the cheapest and easiest solution.  Be aware that most single-turn pots do not cover a full 360º;  if you really need ±180º rotation, you should get a multi-turn pot.  They are much more expensive, but they are also much more precise and repeatable, and also would have much better durability than a carbon-composition or wirewound pot.
9529
The water will cause short circuits, and if you are unlucky you can be the object which shortens the circuit.\n\nThe proper sequence ought to be first turn of the main switches and fuses, then go and salvage what electrical appliances there are.
582852
You said the pipeline (suction or discharge?) was choking but did not say the pump was trouble. So why go to a gravity fed system? I would guess the pipes would continue to choke. The velocity might even be less in the gravity system and that could agravate the problem
606111
Something is wrong with this picture... You are getting 0 psi out while putting 30 psi in?  There has to be some pressure coming out.... otherwise the CFM is going to be zero too.  I realize there is going to be some line loss - but your scenario does not account for a loss of that magnitude.  \n\nI'd check that gauge on the output side... maybe switch the in and out and see if the readings change. \n\nCheers!
317012
you should rethink the program, maybe you missed something in the blueprint that would help you, Also maybe the program is wrong. Also have you made sure that the fixture you are using is correct...Also it could be the inserts you are using..Try a colbalt...That is what we use.