Its common sense, but are their medical or insurance studies that prove it.
127064
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8163284&dopt=Citation
398901
If they should, then so should those who drink alcohol, eat too much fat, have high cholesterol, work high stress jobs, work in factories where smoke and smog are present, etc, etc, etc. The insurance companies make multi millions a year, if not more, and percentage wise, pay very little back in return. So, what do you think.? Should people on the internet all the time pay more for insurance because of eye strain, and possible exposure to electromagnetic frequencies from their monitors and computers, and lack of exercise? Should the Government control your life, so that you exercise daily, eat right, don't smoke or drink, don't get stressed out, don't watch the news where you can become agitated, ad nauseum?
198621
Because there is plenty of proven scientific evidence to back it up as opposed to ID which has faith and a book, nothing more.
205892
Your gut instinct is usually correct.
308960
because they have it and they know
513098
1. Yes, but you can always use some common sense too.\n\n2. Here are some things to think about:-\n(a) different skin complexions with regard to accidents like burns or symptoms like flushing;\n(b) older people and fragility of bones; \n(c) close contact treatments (as with CPR) and ethnic/religious mores.\n\n3. Now go and do some further thinking for yourself, and answer the question in a truly unique, creative and original way.
528412
The study below is a pretty good argument for wshing your face!...;
267012
do you have a link to that study? sounds interesting but i'm not familiar with it.
79988
There are treatments.  Check out the link.
350046
how many years of medical school did it take to reach that opinion?\n\nsomehow I doubt simplistic generalizations can be applied to all circumstances.
320217
There is a lot of evidence. It's just not good evidence. Anecdotal evidence is also evidence. It just doesn't prove much.
209960
I am sure that if there was solid evidence backed by real proof of natural cures for diseases that _many_ healthcare professionals would be talking about them, they would be in respected journals, even the so-called 'evil' pharmaceutical companies would be manufacturing 'enhanced', 'safer', 'more effective' natural cures.  Just look at all the various companies that make different kinds of Vitamin C, Rosehips, Iron pills, and the like for your local grocery store.  \n\nIMHO, I think you're best bet is to work with a professional doctor.\n\n===============\nBe cautious when referencing Kevin Trudeau's "Natural Cures They Don't Want You To Know About."  Do a little reading on this guy, then decide for yourself. Personally, I think he's a huckster out to make a buck using ridiculous claims backed by pseudo-science and possibly outright untruths .. but that's just my opinion .. and some other people like doctors, respected journalists, etc.\n\nAnalysis of Kevin Trudeau's "Natural Cures" Infomercial (2004) by Stephen Barrett, M.D. \nhttp://www.infomercialwatch.org/tran/trudeau.shtml\n\nWikipedia entry\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_Cures_%22They%22_Don't_Want_You_To_Know_About\n\nKevin Trudeau Banned from Infomercials\nhttp://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/09/trudeaucoral.htm\n\n20/20 Report "King Con? Bestselling Author Selling Questionable Cures to the Desperate and Gullible"\nhttp://abcnews.go.com/2020/Health/story?id=1527774\n\nSkeptic's Dictionary\nhttp://skepdic.com/trudeau.html
526821
Yes because of advances in medicine and medical research we can now keep someone's heart beating and lungs functioning long after their brain has turned to a blob of grey jelly. ain't science grand!
477273
maybe they started taking more vitamins and/or eating more healthy diets.
387913
Yes, of course. Doctors aren't exempt from illness, and most have families that need insurance as well. They have to carry their own, from my experience, their employer (if they have one) doesn't offer it.
597358
Only if its thought through first and has a good reason behind it.
9773
For those examples, it is not wrong.