How has he helped the situation of the middle and lower class during his terms? Specific examples that have gone or are going to go into effect before the end of the term.
131549
Nothing....obvious isn't it?
419020
for some he is doing good n for others his  policy is not good\nthere is no proper balance\n\nbut of course he is doing a fine job but not so good or not so bad
181082
My first term, focus on the defict. \n- screw tax breaks to the rich\n- get the he ll out Iraq\n- make Boarder Patrol a government job (w/ union)\n- make better benifits for workers & pay\n- make outsourcing jobs ILLEGAL\n\nMy second term, enter enviornment\n- more research into different fuels (like the one that uses coal\n- put tighter restrictions onto buisness for safer deposal of toxic waste\n- lessen number of animals that can be hunted per year
633789
Is GW looking out for anyone who isn't in the upper classes best interest? \n\nHe has done exactly what any Republican would do, make it easier on the rich and harder on the poor. Their theory is that the money will 'trickle down' to us, eventually helping the economy more than if it were controlled by the government. \n\nIt's great in theory, but unfortunately most of it will sit in offshore accounts, earning ungodly amounts of interest. Those at the top have a habit of keeping hold of their money, not trickling it downward our way.
368664
No. He actually became Chancellor by dealing with other parties. He actually didn't win the popular vote, but his party came in second place.
631723
I remember a couple of things, but look these up to be factual. He allowed the dollar to float, it was on the silver standard and now it is autioned. He allowed privet ownership of gold, he opened free trade with China. Most of these things have hurt the U.S. A. as the dollar is no longer worth a dollar. The very rich are invested in gold and not into things that will help the country grow and you are living the result of free trade with China. That has cost many American jobs. I hope this helps.
511204
If the republicans would have won (7 Nov 06), I could safely say his would be a failed presidency; based on a failed neo-con ideology of preemption war, total environmental degradation, and that both fuel the economy (or at least make rich white guys richer). The next two years could prove positive for him if he works with the moderates. The only problem is, he has put us so far in debt, there is no monies left to work on any sustainable economic paradigms.
536345
Promises Promises\n\nNeither will do what they say they will.  The immigration issue is sort of moot, because Bush already signed the immigration bill a couple weeks ago.  I have not heard anything on their part in how they are going to treat immigrants on the local level though.\n\nChris Bell is the agriculture guy, so he would be against the horse slaughters.
148897
0, from the third to last term.
673192
I agree. The Government is not working FOR the people, it's working for the rich. There is no middle class. Only the rich, and the working poor.  Bush is the worst President in the history of the United States, and his record will speak for itself.
469346
Depends on what you mean by "help"\nIf your talking about a hand-out  - The liberal\n\nIf your talking about targeted tax breaks - the moderate\n\nIf you talking about less government hoops to jump through, less taxes, more jobs and opportunities for advancements - the conservative
266477
Sensenbrenner (House Bill Sponsor) says the provisions about an illegal being a felon were put in at the request of the White House.  Press reports from last December have Bush saying good things about the House Bill. Somewhere he decided he could get his slave labor program put in, and now he wants that.\n\nHe sent a delegate to meet twice with the House and Sensenbrenner didn't even bother to go.  Others from the House just kept saying "The President isn't where the people are," according to press reports.\n\nThe one faction that wins from excessive immigration to the point where education and other services are ruined is big business.  That appears now to be what matters most to him.
375212
Clinton actually had America back to work in his first term, the budget was balanced by the middle of his second term and the minute George Bush was appointed the beginning of the end started, even before he took office the country's economy was showing signs of going to hell. It was actually down the tubes by the end of his first term and has progressed even further down the tubes since.
504740
How about this!! The recent mid-term elections were covered quite differently both across the country and around the world. Some European papers down played the election as ho-hum; while other played it as a near overthrowing of the United States. This should give you something to work with.
18395
I've read (from CNN I think) that he plans on covering 'kitchen table' topics, such as the rising costs of health care, higher education and energy.  He's also going to give us a recap of the war on terror and I've heard rumours a framework for withdraw (based on check points, not dates) from Iraq will be laid out.  He'll probably talk about his tax cuts helping out the economy as well as try to cast the economy in a healthier light than many Americans think that it is right now, probably by highlighting strong corporate earnings and yet another boost in American economic productivity.  I, for one, am excited (and no, I'm not Republican, I'm just curious what/how he is going to say).
534962
If you're looking for something related to our social life or government, you can just take as example what presidents do to their countries. They promise they'll lower taxes for example, they tell us health care will be more efficient... Depending on where you're from (I'd assume from the states) pick for example Bush and some (many) of his promises. Has he done what he said he's do? \nThat's what actions speak louder than words mean. Results come from doing what you said you would do, not just talking about it. \nP.S. If you can, be more specific. It's hard to come up with examples without narrowing it down to more specific areas.
353634
Certainly a rhetorical question.  I'm sure his kids will do for their country what he did for his.  Can you say caste system?