I want to site the verdict of a court case that I found online, but I am not sure who to credit.
128280
It depends on where you are (your jurisdiction) if you found the case online, most reliable sites that list cases show at the very beginning something like: Cite as:\n\nBrown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) (USSC+)\n\nThe word "Brown" and "Board of Education" should be italicized.  The numbers are sometimes the volume number of the case report and then a page number followed by a date and the very last bracket should show you the court and jurisdition (in the above it is the U.S. Supreme Court). Like I said, the site where you found the case should have the proper listing. You can always cite it by using the url of the site where you found it, too...
471000
I am not sure, but you should try looking on Oyez to find out about more supreme court cases.
306563
The time can vary depending on the complexity of the case. You can read more info by following the 1st link below.\n\nTo find the filings, you need to get them from the court that has jurisdiction. Some of those have the info on-line, others don't.\n\nIf the case is large enough, there is often a case management company involved, who posts info on-line. One such company is in the 2nd link below
174626
contact the county courthouse where the case was settled and they can send you the info you need-it is public record.
447874
Ask the clerk of court of the Ramsey County and it is the only way.  What happened in the court cannot be divulged online.
43859
Try www.westlaw.com they may charge for some information.
143591
If you take bad advice from an Internet chat/question and answer site, it is YOUR FAULT! Stop trying to find ways to sue people. You are not hiring someone for legal advice on Yahoo answers. See a licensed attorney in your state if you need legal advice. If you do something EXTREMELY stupid as a result of a website, you were EXTREMELY stupid to begin with.\n\nWell, after all that, I would love to give you some case law and advice about liability, but that would be legal advice and my lawyer is not in today to write me up a disclaimer to add at the bottom of this.
666989
You need to go to a library where they have the stuff annotated.  Just knowing the cases is not enough you have to know what the court said they mean and this is in the annotated statutes for your state of federal government.  If you have a large county library may have a law book section, if not find out where you can access annotated law statutes at a library.  The books on this are very expensive and so are the internet subscriptions.
21292
Yes. District Court and the Circuit Court of Appeals\n\nWEEKS v. U S , 245 U.S. 618 (1918)\n\nThis was a prosecution under the Act of June 30, 1906, c. 3915, 34 Stat. 768, upon a charge of shipping an article of food in interstate commerce in circumstances making the shipment a violation of the act. The information contained two counts, both charging that the article was misbranded-one because it bore a false and misleading label, and the other because it was offered for sale as lemon oil when in truth it was an imitation thereof containing alcohol and citral derived from lemon grass. In the District Court there was a conviction upon both counts, and the Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the conviction as [245 U.S. 618, 620] to the first count and affirmed it as to the second. 224 Fed. 64, 139 C. C. A. 626. The judgment upon the latter is all that is brought here for review.\n\nIn the Circuit Court of Appeals the view was expressed [245 U.S. 618, 623] that intent was not an element of the offense charged in the second count and therefore that it was immaterial whether the representations of the salesman had the sanction of the defendant. Complaint is now made of this. But the question is not in the case, the view expressed by the Circuit Court of Appeals not being essential to an affirmance of the judgment. The District Court had expressly instructed the jury that to hold the defendant responsible criminally by reason of such representations it must appear, and appear beyond a reasonable doubt, that they were made by his authority. The record before us does not show that the defendant objected to the submission of this question to the jury in this way; neither does it purport to contain all the evidence. The verdict therefore must be taken as conclusively determining that the representations were made with the defendant's sanction.\n\nJudgment affirmed
400510
Try Here:\nhttp://www.judis.nic.in/\nYou can search for decisions by case number or by party name.
292861
try the court recordes dept where it was final
78386
Given. A judgment has been given in the case.
541665
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/docket.html\nThe supreme court docket online.\nHas both resolved and pending court cases.
266229
In my experience, the overall package is what decides a verdict in this case. Traditionally, it is said that unless there are clear reasons, the courts will side with the mother, but in this - as in any case! - it depends on what you bring forward as proof. I'm tempted to say that unless there are other facts at play (most notably, poor treatment of the children), the individual effect will be limited. Keep in mind that sometimes, the children get a vote themselves (especially if they are older: 10 or so). Good luck!
404258
Look at the cite - North Dakota case.
559243
You might try looking for the local newspaper's Website, and check their "archives".
352360
You can go to the courthouse. They should have that information available to anyone. I doubt they put it online.