If you're unsure about the answer please visit this site and spare sometime to watch this little documentary:\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=Loose+Change&pl=true
136514
It was an attack and all those conspiracy theories are disrespectful to those who died and their families and friends.
664773
I believe that you will find this link somewhat useful as it does have dates that if you take the time might help you to track down the information that you are looking for because it seems that none want to put that information out where it can be found.  I even called the research department of the library on this - and they couldn't find the information.  Link is here:\n\nhttp://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/opinion/14298154.htm\n\nYou will find the link in the "source" portion pretty informative.  Something that I ran into when I was trying to find it on my own on the net.
263757
If the US government answered all of the NUMEROUS conspiracy theories and the ravings of the theorists, nothing would change.  remember the whole Kennedy Assassination thing.  There is NO credible evidence that a conspiracy took place.  Some use that as evidence of the conspiracy.  \n\nSame here.  you will never get the crazies to go away.  I watched you video.  I question much of it.  We already have all agreed that many of the indicators were there and not responded to, everyone has already agreed that several people have dropped the ball and allowed a possibly preventable incident to occur.  That people were criminally negligent does not make a conspiracy.  That someone in a think tank refers to the catastrophy of Pearl Harbor  doesn't mean that they are intending to reenact it.  \n\nThis is much like the Da Vinci Code....   A great story built on random facts, conjecture and fantasy.\n\nIs our inablility to perceive the organiztion, hatred, psychoses, and determination of the scum that did this the sign of our complicity of our ineptitude.\n\n The truth is not always out there.  Sometimes it is what it seems to be, and other times.... we may never know.
533237
Read the 14 here - not quite what you spun is it?\n\nhttp://www.oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm\n-
60346
still no answers? not an advert, just trying to share info.\ngovernment explained simply,\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=98\nmoney,\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/griffin_stream.html\neducation,\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/taylor_stream.html\nhttp://www.philipdru.com/gatto_stream.html\nww1 wilson,\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com/InterviewDisplay.aspx?i=88\nhttp://www.philipdru.com\nhttp://weekendinterviewshow.com\nhttp://thestressblog.com\nhttp://www.antiwar.com\nhttp://www.kaos959.com
115458
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7772696530684663669&q=Loose+Change+2nd+Edition\n\nplease watch this informative video..it may help
241391
Ive seen the loose change video. I still support the USA. I admit I must play devils advocate to both sides. I don't believe either. Not the "official story", or "loose change."\nI believe its more likely a combination of the two. Somewhere in between both side's agenda. I think that the government probably has a pretty legitimate reason for falsifying some of the information, but doesn't do well in the cover up department. While much of the rest is just over-speculation driven by conspiracy theorists. \nI think that the war in Iraq is good for our military, but bad for that region. I think that it was implemented under the guise of the search for WMD, but was actually for military position for the long time troublesome Iran & palestine. \n\nTo win a war you need 2 things for certain, power and position. The USA has the power, but lacked the position.\nIraq is that position. Seems clear to me. I do not feel sorry for those who serve the military, they made that choice full well knowing what the outcome could be. I do feel sorry for the Iraqies though, but believe still that the aftermath could be truly liberating for their population. \nOnly time will tell. \nThe only thing that is certain is that the US Federal Government is overwhelmingly corrupt. \nWe have a broken system at home. Therefore we should think incredibly hard about pusshing our system onto other nations.
637424
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html\nhttp://wtc.nist.gov/\nhttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/05/911_documentary_removed/\nhttp://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html\nhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html\n\nNow let's have a second try?  G'head, let's see where you go with it.
370986
Do you mean if there is any change in the world hunger/starvation situation?  We shouldn't do anything in the event of change .... WE SHOULD **BE** THE CHANGE!  The United States is blessed beyond belief with resources, and we should share them with others... not just other countries but with our own people as well.   There are so many poor people right here in the United States.  Now I am certainly not suggesting that we only take care of "our own"...but rather that we should help ourselves AND those in other countries.  Are you in the U.S.?  If so then I'm sure that you are aware of the enormous amount of food that rots in the dumpsters.  It's sickening.  There is so much that we could do, but yet we don't do it because our focus is on earning a buck and making sure that the rich here remain as exactly that- RICH.  Major reform is needed.  Generosity is needed.
336539
I dont know. I really dont know. How would you find out? Government statistics? Not a good vote-getter! Even if you go back to previous governments , its still pretty hard to judge how scrupulous they were.They , of course , 'justify' the expense - 'defending freedom' , a 'cost-effective' health service,an aging population affecting pensions ( gosh , an aging population , that must have come as a surprise!). Bit of a rant here , but I feel that you understand!
431533
Annie, the issue really doesn't appear to be if global changes are happening but why. The movie has some truths to it but the alarmist nature of the movie is a bit over the top in my view and that of many others who have seen it. No doubt we must do what we can within reason to stop adding to a problem, but we also have to be able to reasonably show that us making a change would have an effect and not make decisions in haste that will negatively affect other unless they will make a difference. Not good to go off running and shouting about the sky falling unless it really is falling.\n\n\nedit: I applaud you thinking for yourself in this matter. Gather all the information you can find, check it out and make up your own mind rather than just fall in line.
557848
yea i saw loose change... it is quite crazy... to me it seems believeable...
431089
What a brilliant topic!  You coulld write heaps on this.  Three items I'd be prepared to give up? Let's see, I object to too much government interference in my life, but acknowledge the need for a central organising power.  So, perhaps look at what changes have happened, especially since 9/11, to personal freedoms. And what people have seemed to accept, more or less willingly, in order to ensure safety.  It's much easier to list three items you WOULDN"T give up.  I wouldn't give up right to free speech, for example.  It's too important.
513704
I hunted all over.. interesting question.. I found the link for you to browse. I learned some new information I had no idea about as well. Thank you. LL.
640704
Some of what is presented in "loose change" can be disputed to the point of possibly being coincidental or hear say.\n\nBut there are also things that are pointed out in the film that cannot be disputed, as it would violate the laws of physics for them to have occurred in the way that our government has led us to believe.\n\nI have been doing research on both sides of this issue and there are several items that violate physics.\n\n1. No mater how structurally compromised the struck floors were, the towers could not have fallen at free fall speed. This can only occur when there is no support anywhere under the falling structure.\n\n2. You cannot take out multiple light poles on the way into the pentagon with out leaving massive amounts of debris in the path from the poles knocking chunks out of the plane much less the flaming fuel spill it would have produced. The Boeing fuel tests proved that a plane hitting even a single light pole would rip the wing off creating a huge fireball immediately. There was no debris or scorch marks anywhere other than the scorch marks at the building itself.\n\nThe laws of physics do not conveniently change for anyone no matter how much rhetoric that people spew. We will probably never know the truth about who was responsible, but we do know that the story our government has fed us doesn't hold water.
639194
How about you do some more research, and then tell us what YOU think.  A little common sense will get you thinking the right way.  Good luck.\n\nhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html\nhttp://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html\nhttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/05/911_documentary_removed/\nhttp://wtc.nist.gov/\nhttp://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html\nhttp://911myths.com/
660187
I think that the pseudo-documentary does make some valid points, but unfortunately discounts valid explanations in favor of a vague conspiracy. \nI am a little disappointed at the tactics of the makers of this film. They uploaded torrents for downloads of the Loose Change movie under other headings, in order to get their message out, which seems kinda slimy. They also use this forum, like the person who asked this question, in order to make a buck.\n\nThe main point is the same in any criminal investigation: in any crime (and 9-11 was a crime), what is the motive? Who stands to gain? I know why the terrorists did it, and why they targeted the buildings they did. If its some darkconspiracy, I am unsure who did it and why.\n\nUnfortunately, the movie-makers don't either. While the conspiracy documentary asks a few good questions, it doesn't follow up on them with anything approaching research, and leaves the viewer feeling used by the movie-makers.