I found the answer to the term "John Doe" at this web link: "www.newswek.net/id/6596866/site/newsweek/".  I'd like a similar answer to my question.
130013
When John Q. Public made his print debut in the late 1930s, he joined a long line of generic "Johns" in English. About 10 years earlier, "John Citizen" had started appearing in British texts as a nickname for the average joe. Messrs. Public and Citizen are linguistic youngsters compared to "John Doe"; that term has been used for an anonymous or average man since the mid-1600s. Initially, such generic terms were predominantly male, but that changed with the arrival of "Jane Doe" in the 1930s. "Joan Citizen" debuted in the 1940s, but "Jane Q. Public" didn't find her way into English texts until the mid-1980s. By the way, some think the "Q" was inspired by John Quincy Adams.
618948
I am always looking for a "johnny blaze" question.  They are always unique and thought provoking.  I highly recommend that you read "Memnoch The Devil", by Anne Rice.  While I would never suggest that such an important question as this be answered by a popular novel, this book does explore your inquiry.  Like Anne Rice, I had a young child die.  During the intitial phases of my devastation, I read this book.  To me, Ms. Rice completely explained the whole God-Devil relationship and even how God can let someone's kid die...after he saw his own child's death.  Keep up the questions...they are awesome.
249468
google it, or do a library search on 'cold cases' or 'unsolved cases' or something. good luck!
381539
I suggest that you are correct. On a simple level, just look at the serial killers of the last 30 years; almost all came from religious backgrounds, and many felt they were doing Gods work.
281547
cheri_da_rn: he meant carpentry!\n\nI wonder, was it before or after he got married to Mary Magdalene? You couldn't really hold it against the guy if he was already married and THEN found out that he was supposed to be the Messiah, and die on the cross, etc.
541430
We'll never know the truth-a lot of records needed are sealed until 2050. Seems there's something they don't want us to know. There's so many theories and I know someone did murder the President besides Oswald. To make it more confusing, I saw some stuff on LBJ-there's a video of his mistress of 20 years that was pretty believable. And documents to back that up. I know there were plenty that didn't like JFK and it was probably a combination of theories. The LBJ theory has a few points in its' favor. LBJ was part of a powerful wealthy group of mostly Texas Oil guys. Some interesting names that include Nixon. LBJ became president and the oil guys got some handsome oil subsidies that JFK wanted to get rid of. There are those(including McNamara, JFK's Defense secretary) that felt JFK would never have escalated Vietnam. To make it weirder,, Bobby Kennedy probably would have been President in '69 but was also assasinated, and Nixon became President instead. I'll watch the other video-seems big oil sure could've been a factor.
91667
A good idea would be to make a simple search for ideas, such as...\n\nhttp://www.google.com/search?q=stag+and+doe\n\nYou may also want to ask your question in a different way. I think that "Stag and Doe" isn't as widely used as you think. I 've actually never heard the term before, so depending on where you live it might be a very region-specific way to describe the event.
416696
I'm on the same search... I think I found the info we both need... \n\nhttp://youtube.com/watch?v=ELcECCT6-28
664773
I believe that you will find this link somewhat useful as it does have dates that if you take the time might help you to track down the information that you are looking for because it seems that none want to put that information out where it can be found.  I even called the research department of the library on this - and they couldn't find the information.  Link is here:\n\nhttp://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/opinion/14298154.htm\n\nYou will find the link in the "source" portion pretty informative.  Something that I ran into when I was trying to find it on my own on the net.
373247
In the book written by John L Anderson he claims that Che was killed by a  Cuban Ameican CIA trianed individual named Felix Rodriguez. That book is very well reearched so I am proned to believe the author's claim. Do I think his death was justified?  He was rather ruthless at times, but that is not for me to decide. I guess you can say that by living the revolutionary life, he had to know his end would not be pretty. I will say this, he did not die a coward.
654500
Search for his name here.\n\nhttp://cryptome.org/mil-dead-iqw.htm#March%202006
84848
I don't know about elsewhere, but in the South, the first wife was always proudly referred to in the '50s as "Mrs. John Doe" (note the omission of her own first name). Look at old Southern Junior League cook books.\n This title would be emphasized if he were to run off with a person of non-recognized social standing. There are many older ladies I know who still refer to themselves today as "Mrs. John Doe" although their husbands have been dead 20-30 years!\nThe new wife would simply not be recognized at all by the women of society, who would pointedly avoid even looking at her. She would enjoy no title except perhaps "Miz Ruby" and would be called this even by the local lower society folks.
160830
This is a great source... and if it's not in their database, they'll research it.\n\nGood luck
197153
I did a totally layman's search of the Internet and found nothing except articles about videos being shot. Maybe your friend only heard part of the story?\n\nI know, no help. But I tried. :)\n\n~Tia~
102038
Well besides a lot of the people who post questions and answers here, I would have to say it was that Russian guy who was into cannibalism.  He killed like 60 people I think.  What a nut job.
71148
O. J.'S EX WIFE WAS MURDERED ALONG WITH A MAN NAMED RON GOLDMAN.  Mr. Goldman was a waiter at a resturant that Nicole (OJ's ex) ate dinner.  It appeared as if Ron were trying to return Nicoles glasses which had been left at the resturant.  They wer knifed.  The police went to OJ's and entered his property w/o a warrant and found some evidence they thought incriminated OJ.  OJ was arrested and charged.  A hearing was held and the Defense asked the Court to block the evidence because thwe police didn't get a warrant.  The police said they went onto OJ's property because they were worried about his safty and the Court said the evidence COULD be used since OJ wasn't a suspect at the time the police went on hiss property.  Most newspapers felt that the Judge and police were lying when they said that OJ wasn't a suspect.  Photos inside OJ's house seemed somwhat inconsistant.  Some showed blood in one photo and no blood in others which meant the blood had to have been planted.  The case was moved to the next court for jury trial.  During the jury trial it was found that blood from the murder scene was transpotrted to OJ's house before being taken to a lab.  That is not how the blood is to be handled.  One police Officer was caught lying about his use of the word "Nigg--" which led to the belief that he and others were biased.  OJ met with a minister and confessed to the killing but confessions to ministers can't be used in court.  One piece of evidence was a glove the police said OJ wore during the killing.  OJ was asked to put the glove on but when he tried it was way too small.  The police credibility was destoryed and the jury found OJ not Guilty.  I think OJ did the crime and the police tried to create additional evidence to insure a conviction.  I think the first Judeg was wrong (even dishonest)
503482
You know, John Grisham addressed this issue in his novel "A Time to Kill", if you ave not read it, try to. Or at least check it out on Amazon.com it may give you some insight. \nPersonally I hope I never have to make that choice.