I am looking for the curent laws protecting the life of an unborn child that men have
131395
you can get a restraining order to keep her from doing it
291044
Here is a link to search statutes by state for issues related to child adoption. Results will provide summaries of State statutes (and full text of laws, in some cases).\nhttp://naic.acf.hhs.gov/general/legal/statutes/search/index.cfm\n\nHope this helps. Best wishes and God bless
422683
Seek out a church and speak witht eh priest or preacher.\n\nAsk that the church help you and babies get to another town or county.\n\nIF these other law inforcements aren't helping you, you should contact Dateline NBC. 20/20 ABC  any big news show  and have the whole damned city and county  responsible for your not getting the help rightly due you and children.
301251
Perhaps you did not know this, but this is a problem going on in China as we speak. If a woman has already has 1 child, she is not allowed another. The police literally tie her down to the abortion table for the doctor to perform the abortion.Since she does not really have a say in the matter, there is no sin. The problem is not with the woman it is in the Chineese government.
457784
Abortion is immorally wrong and legally protected. That's life...err...death. You make a good point though.\n\nTHE PROMLEM though, is that such a law could easily be used by deadbeat dads to refuse child support.
350092
Human rights my ass....ever heard of BABIES.  Maybe if more of you were more pro-active in protecting babies rights, I might take you more seriously,,,,untill then YOUR ASS BACKWARDS.
208250
call the Planned Parenthood offices. I am sure they can give you all the info you need
648490
Go to your county child support enforcement office..  Most states have these in every county.\nOtherwise phone a lawyer and ask.\nThey won't charge you for asking.
665983
Do a search on murder rates of pregnant women.I'm pretty sure there is a seperate charge for the death of a fetus when the mother is murdered.Abortion is murder and should be treated the same.
482490
http://www.karenwheaton.com/cms/page.aspx?pageid=144\n\nhttp://ramp.torontopubliclibrary.ca/secondary/emergency/pregnancy/emergencycontraception/three-content.jsp
52372
Planned parenthood, here is a link to find one near you.\nhttp://www.plannedparenthood.org/pp2/portal/
624970
Three separate points in time, so three separate issues.\n\nFirst, sex and conception. Both parties have the right to make decisions on whether they are being involved. Non-consensual sex is called rape, whether it's male or female. \n\nThird (yes, I'm skipping second for now), there is after birth. Again, both parents are equally involved and have the same rights and obligations. Both are liable for child support, based on what they can afford.\n\nSecond, we have the period during pregnancy, after conception but before live birth. Let's split this into two separate periods.\n\nIn the last few months, called post-viability, the fetus is capable of living on its own (with medical help). So, who has rights during this time. The two lives directly involved -- the fetus and the mother. The father is not directly involved, since he's not contributing anything to helping the fetus grow. So, he has no rights to affect this part of the process.\n\nSo far, during these stages, there's no real argument about who is involved, and whose rights are at issue.\n\nThe argument comes during the first part of the pregnancy, pre-viability where there is just an embryo that cannot survive on its own. Because it cannot survive on its own, it is not an independent life. It's irrelevant for this discussion whether it's a human life at all or not, because whether it is or not, it's not an independent life. Thus, it does not have independent rights. So, the only person directly involved with independent rights is the mother.\n\nNow, many state governments say that even if the embryo does not have independent rights, the state can still assert rights on its behalf. Thus, you have arguably two parties involved -- the mother and the state (on behalf of the potential future baby). \n\nHowever, in no other legal situation anywhere does a possible future potential person or controversy merit legal protection. Maybe this situation is unique, and special rules are in order. Maybe it's not. \n\nBut either way, the sperm-donor is not directly involved during the first few months of the pregnancy (after conception), and so has no rights. Also, no legal obligations during this period.\n\nSo the only question is whether the government should be allowed to assert rights, on behalf of the future potential fetus. And personally, I don't trust the government to make those kind of decisions, so I'd rather leave it up to the mother alone during that time.
568467
go to http://www.babies-by-levin.com\n\nDr. Richard Levin
268632
Try Planned Parenthood. I've provided some important links from their website below.\n\n\nhttp://www.plannedparenthood.org/pp2/portal/healthservices/\nhttps://www.plannedparenthood.org/pp2/portal//healthservices/makeappointment/?state=IL\n\nI hope this helps. Good luck!!
241179
Official website: \nhttp://www.supremecourtus.gov/\n\nThese websites discuss the supreme court decisions on abortion:\nhttp://www.godandscience.org/abortion/sld019.html\nhttp://www.unitedforlife.org/court_decisions.htm\n\nThis website discusses the current situation:\nhttp://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/jul/05072001.html
210249
laws very from state to state. i don't think you can collect support after the child was adopted because the father would have to give up his rights. when he did that he relieves his self of past payments due. most men give up there rights as a father to keep from paying child support. but i would check w/ a lawyer to be on the safe side.
31840
You need a family law lawyer.  He should have methods of finding those things out.