As it was described by the following link:\n\nhttp://noquestionsasked.org/blog/index.php?p=46\n\nThe media is doing a lousy job looking at the correct translation of the important issues such as the one said by foreign leaders. Where is the true reporters who would look deep into the news and find the truth among all the false information fed by a small group of war mongers?
126039
They are too busy worrying about a "wardrobe malfunction" and the FCC, to worry about finding truth. \nOr maybe Jack Nicholson said it best in a "Few Good Men".. "Truth? I'll tell you about truth- you can't handle the truth" \nor something to that effect. It is called disinformation, and the media is doing a great job of that.
106047
There is to much to copy and paste so go here.\nhttp://www.newsflash.org/2004/02/tl/tl012575.htm
362739
Yeah, well media is doing a great job with their brains.. sorry, to say so, I have been living in US for a while I used to believe that this war (Irak) was confusing, but probably was the right thing to do... I see things from another perspective now.  Unfortunately, wars are simply for selling weapons, getting more power, and nothing have to do with being or not a HERO...  I hope people could think for themselves, with all the proves they have in front of their eyes,  but they wouldn't see it.  I feel sorry for some of them.
613124
I'm going to have to politely disagree on the grounds that the mainstream media, in Bush's corner, has deceived most everyone, in the US at least. Which isn't going to last forever, might I add.\n\nMountains of evidence supports that the "war on terror" is just a big farce!\n\nIf you have time, you may want to listen to some alternative views on what's actually going on:
245356
its funny, but even though one can produce word for word accounts, and their own ppl found "no reliable evidence" there will be ppl that will immediately dismiss things like that as "liberalist media" or some crap. \n\ni love it when they use clips on the daily show of bush or rumsfield from a year ago (often much less) and then clip from today, and the things they're saying are polar opposties.\n\ni.e. rumsfield saying "we know where the wmd's are, they're south, north, east and west of baghdad" \n\nand then a week or two ago "i never said we knew where they were".\n\nbrilliant
103036
Thank you.  It's nice to know who our friends are and believe me, the respect and admiration goes both ways.  Though if you want a true look at who these "anti-war" protestors are, follow the link.  The zombietime "hall of shame" is enough to make one's dinner return.  However, the photographer also highlights the good people in the counter-protests and those who oppose terrorism in the "Bus-19" event.\n\nIt's amazing to see the difference between the rabid "anti-war" leftists and those who oppose them with dignity and self-respect.\n\nJust so one knows, I use "anti-war" as these "tolerant" and "open-minded" protestors seem to support any war in which the USA and her allies are destroyed and thus are only "anti-war" when the USA and her allies are winning.  Though, ironically, these same people are the first the terrorists would kill if given the chance (the "Queers for Palastine" group obviously didn't read Islamic Law's view on homosexuality)...  A chance the Armed Forces of America, England, and Australlia not to mention police and intelligence agencies world-wide will not give the terrorists.  \n\nYes, the irony of it all is the same people the leftists hate so much are protecting those same leftists from the terrorists and dictators they seem to love.
313162
Dear Friend,\n\nThe truth is an absolute defense to charges of libel.  Sometimes telling the truth about your murderous government is the way to honor your beloved country.  Why don't we cast you in a re-enactment of Abu Grahib for a few weeks and see how YOU feel about treatment of Iraqis?\n\nYour Friend,\nFrancesois
495150
Oh yeah.  Journalists now tell you what the news means.  Not report it.  How about letting us decide?
631228
First off, I'm not going to fully accept this story until I see something about it in the news on pbs. (hasn't happened yet)\n\nWith that said, I see 2 problems:\n1. We can't make deals with the insurgents. Only the new Iraqi government can and if they accept it then we should.\n\n2. Are the insurgents willing to accept the new Iraqi government as the controlling power in Iraq... even after we leave?\n\n3. From reading your link onthe story, it appears to only be a portion of the insurgency. So that would be a problem.
580942
having been in Iraq, I am totally shocked at how different the reality of the war is from how it is covered. We captured Saddam, killed his sons and Zarqawi and created a democracy in the Middle East, one that has higher levels of participation that in our own country. Yet all I hear are about mis-steps and allegations.\n\nI don't get too down about it though, think of it this way. Do you ever read about good cops? Nope, only the bad ones make the news. We live in an age when a doctor can replace your heart with  a donor heart or a Jarvik heart- which is like something out of science-fiction-  yet you never read about stuff like that.\n\nIt's not that the media is liberal or anti-war, so much as it is negative.
98172
Because the main stream media is very left wing and biased against the conseritives in this country. They publish only the bad news. Take Iraq, the cover bombings & alleged atrocities and say nothing about the schools being built, GIs interacting with the population and kids, etc.
153130
http://news.yahoo.com/s/cmp/186500837;_ylt=AjPHiKySGwJQzF7FME19tcEjtBAF;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--\n\n\nthat's the article
661239
The problem with the media is that it is international and doesn't always act in what is the best interests of our country.  CNN especially says that they provide news for the whole world and are not responsive to any one country.  Efforts should be made of course to keep information related to our national security from this and other organizations that do not feel they are part of US
391506
No need for talk.  They have been found.\n\nhttp://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/24/world/middleeast/24saddam.html?em&ex=1164517200&en=5ce3558fcf7f649e&ei=5087%0A\n\napologies to captainobnoxious.  I couldn't resist.
630328
To have something to complain about. For example:\n\nIraq's arsenal of weapons of mass destruction was not captured by US forces who heroically brought down Saddam Hussein's regime three years ago this week. It vanished before they arrived.\nIsraeli intelligence reported before the US-led invasion that starting in late summer 2002 Saddam's WMD arsenal was shipped by truck convoy to Syria. Recently, documents seized from Iraq after the fall of the regime were released to the public. Those documents revealed that under the direct command of former Russian prime minister and KGB boss Yevgeny Primakov, Russian Spetnaz forces oversaw the transfer of Iraq's WMD to Syria ahead of the US-led invasion. These reports have been corroborated by Saddam's Air Vice Marshall General Georges Sada.\n\nSo rather than being destroyed or secured, Saddam's WMD arsenal was simply moved from one rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations to another rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations.\n\nOf course, American Media will NOT report this, it will prove Bush right, and then they would look stupid.\n\nMichael Moore, thanks:\nFriday, 23 June 2006 \nWhen News Lies \n\n\nWHEN NEWS LIES\nMedia Complicity and The Iraq War\n\n\nBy Danny Schechter, The News Dissector\n\n\n\nA new book from Danny Schechter offers an up to date indictment of the role media played in promoting and misreporting the war on Iraq. It is an analysis of how and why the media got it wrong that pinpoints the failures of journalism and the collusion of media companies with the Bush Administration. The author of EMBEDDED: Weapons of Mass Deception (Prometheus 2003), an account of the TV coverage of the US invasion, returns with a more comprehensive, updated and insider look at the media complicity that Schechter argues "made the war possible."\n\n\n\n"Most of the anti-war movement focused on the crimes of the Bush Administration ignoring the mainstream media, its far more effective accomplice," says former network producer Danny Schechter (ABC, CNN). "The government orchestrated the war while the media marketed it. You couldn't have one without the other."\n\n\n\nWHEN NEWS LIES includes the feature -length DVD of the prize-winning film WMD (Weapons of Mass Deception). The book will also include the complete script as well as a discussion of the challenges of exposing media with media with a documentary. It chronicles the media war fought alongside the military campaign and the struggle to stand up for truth. \n\nSource(s):\nGoogle it:\n\nSaddam, WMD, Spetsnaz\n\nhttp://www.wmdthefilm.com/mambo/index.ph...
627804
Good thing it is a wire report or Fox would have a spin on it or not reported it.\n\nIt just confirms what has been said all along.\n\nThe world views America as a bigger threat to world peace than any country.\n\nThey also think we are the terrorist.
614876
It is sad to state that with over 2,500 US KIA & MIA since the beginning on March 20th 2003, it turns to be an average of more than 2 servicemen a day. 2 more each passing day...\n\nNews like news and as soon as something turns into a "daily matter" they bury the subject. \n\n2 servicemen names would have had to be honored in sharing a same daily headline since 3/20/03... If any newspaper had launched such a frontpage I can't imagine what politicians would have done...