Law, by different writers.
135869
Law, in its first form, was a set of guidelines given by God to help you stay spiritually healthy.\n\nLaw, now, is a bent-out-of-shape, useless, piece of RED-TAPE.\n\nYeah. Thats law.
247177
Yeah! Law would be perfect. Lawyers are all crooks.
35983
Here are some intresting ones.
532514
Interpentation is in the eye of the beholder. It's like the glass is either half empty or half full. And if your talking about law, your talking about a language that is all on it's own. No real person would have made up such words that a mear common man could ever dream of let alone say or write. How many are there? Too many, too many for simple people but for the rich and the unjust the more the better!!! Good day Sir.
205821
Beware! there are laws against plagiarism.
215347
Well, that was a very profound answer from a "blooming" law student.\n\nCare to enlighten us on what you found on this subject during your "free time"??  You have free time to look this up, more free time to type a response, but not time to tell us anything worth reading?? hhhmmmm\n\nGeez, you'd better add some substance to your answers once you graduate or the Bar will chew you up!!
106063
I think you got jinxed up with this. \nYou see, In ancient times, before Laws were enacted and legislated, all disputes were solved by the King and his Ministers who were addressed as Lords. The disputes were solved as per "JUSTICE, EQUITY AND GOOD CONCIENCE". Hence the Court was called "COURT OF JUSTICE"\n\nNow it is entirely different. Laws are enacted and legislated and are put down on papers. Even the Judges cannot go outside the scope of these laws, even if it fundamentally or morally goes against "JUSTICE AND EQUITY". \nHence, now the Court is called "COURT OF LAW" and NOT Court of Justice.
27720
also try www.westlaw.com\ngo to the law library.....they could help you cite the case to make it easier!
399290
it would probably be advised that it is written by a lawyer
475129
Neither of these statments is even close to being true.  If someone spoke the line you said and another changed it, the term for what the second person did would be "misquoting".  The term for what the first did would most likely be "libel".
121719
He was an author of some renown.
452758
Doctors are bound by both the law, their ethical oath, and their own moral compass.  Doctors in this story are placing the privacy of their patient before the interests of the people.  The courts will sort it out.
63628
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hilden/20060131.html\n\n150mil to 250 million. Says the writers of some book.\n\nBetter source than me.
371253
What ever state law says.
511982
Statutory and common laws are basically based on the same principles of what is good and bad.  The parliament and the judges always consider the public opinion in making laws.  What the majority thinks is the basic element in making a law.
246365
In more ways than one.
140877
I'm gonna go with law.