Need the printer for home printing. I hate wires and was wondering if such printers have made an appearance or not.
121489
Canon's Pixma iP4000R (Win 98 or newer, Mac OS X 10.2 or newer, $190 to $220) \n\nor just search amazon...\nhttp://www.amazon.com/gp/search/ref=nb_ss_e/104-6997278-6917526?url=search-alias%3Delectronics-aps&field-keywords=wifi+printer
307266
Hello. I recently purchased an HP 3600n Color Laser* from Office Depot to replace 2 of my three printers. To date I am very happy with the results. It did not completely replace my HP G85, since it is also my primary fax machine. It did however replace my Lexmark 4039 10Plus and all primary color printing. It still leaves me with an OkiData 390 to print labels. I use the 5000 box of continious feed labels, so at the moment there is nothing I can do about replacing it. Between my two companies, the wifes eBay and the three kids printing daily, we print a case of paper a month (5000 sheets).\nI would have loved to have purchased an all-in-one color laser but all things consided I am very happy.\nOne thing that swayed me to the HP, in that price range, was it came with a print server built in.\n\nI hope this helpped.
162900
I've given up completely with Epson printers.  I think I've had 4 altogether (or about 10 if you count all the replacements).  Never had a 2200 model.  Had a 7800 (acceptable) a C70 and a C60 (appauling) and a basic printer that I can't remember the model number of (dire).\n\nWith the exception of the 7800 I was constantly in maintenance mode, alligning print heads, cleaning nozzles, replacing cartridges etc.  I personally found them to be extremely slow, unreliable and nowhere near as good a quality as was made out.\n\nFrom experience I'd certainly recommend going for a laser printer over an inkjet for normal black and white printing.\n\nI've had or still have Panasonic, Brother and Canon printers which have given me no trouble.  The Panasonic finally got thrown out the other day after about 10 or 12 years of faithful service and printing over half a million pages.  Other than routine servicing there was never a problem with it.  No problems with Canon and the Brother just prints and prints and prints and hardley ever needs new cartidges.\n\nGiven a choice of another Epson or pen and paper I'd stick with the pen and paper.
298342
I like Good Shepard Printers but you also need to contact your state business offices to see if the name has  not been taken.  Not everyone trademarks the name of their business.
59945
you would have to establish what t ype of cable you need and then from there it should be easy, I am guessing it would be parallel or serial since it seems pretty old I may be wrong so if you look on the printer itself it will be visible.\n\nIf you are asking by looking at that image then im not sure however that site does have a link to the manul so i would take a look at the manual and it will tell you in there :)
506947
not easy to find, but try this place:\n\nhttp://www.abcink.com/apollo-p1200-printer.html
414795
Ok, first of all, unless you are buying a laser printer that can handle input from DOS and uses an internal font, then the computer is sending VASTLY more than a few K to print even a simple letter.\n\nThe reason is that the image is sent over as (for example) a 600 x 600 dpi bitmap.  If you are printing a full page, it can be in the megabytes in theory.\n\nI do agree though, that the computer will handle this effortlessly.\n\nAs for whether this is a feature or not, it is a way to make the printer cheaper - like video cards that use the computers memory - if you are after a REALLY cheap printer, this might fit the bill nicely.\n\nDo bear in mind though, that COLOUR lasers can be found for under £200 / $400 if you shop around. It may be out of your price range, but if if "close", perhaps something to conisder....
85227
You can probably get an adapter. If you go on the web site of the printer brand, they might sell it... or go to a computer store like Frys, and they will most likely have a USB to Parallel port adapter.
26351
There are two solutions that you can choose from:\n\n1.  Port the printer to a desktop that is on your network and then share the printer.\n\n2.  Purchase a wireless print server... I've seen some available at Wal-Mart and Best Buy...
420833
Seems like you're looking for XMPie or HighWay from Fuji-Xerox. These two solutions are specially designed for professional web-to-print freeflow.\n\nHave a look: http://www.xmpie.com\n\nIf you're interested, you should contact Fuji-Xerox for a demonstration of their product. But bear in mind this solution cost big bucks. On the other hand, it's the best of today's technology for web2print.
556026
Usually when you look at printers, in the model number it has an n meaning network.  For example an HP Laserjet 4050n.  I would try Office Depot or Staples over Best Buy or go directly to HP or whatever brand you desires webpage.
160544
Any printer/scanner that is XP compatible will work.  Your next question(s) should concern the cost of operating and the quality of the output.  Buying a printer that prints 4 pages per minute as opposed to one that prints 20 pages per minute for a minimal difference in price as well as a higher quality output should also be considered.  If all you want is a cheap printer - you can probably buy one used.
566366
If you don't plan on using it a whole bunch, you might consider the HP 5440. It costs about $70 and the black and color cartridge can be bought together in a pack for $30. \n\nIf you do quite a bit of printing take a look at the HP 5940 ($100) as it's built a little heftier and also comes with cartridges that last longer but cost a little more.\n\nThe HP 6980 is another good choice since it comes with wireless networking and costs about $150. It also has cartridges that last longer.\n\nHP printers are the best selling printers by far in the United States and PC Magazine's readers have voted them the best 14 years in a row.
613895
Your wife's right. And not right too. \n\n==========\nbackgournd \n\nInkjets work by squirting ink through very very small holes in a print head. Canon and HP and several others do that by heating the ink in a chamber just behind the hole, which 'boils' a small bit of it creating a bubble, increasing the pressure and forcing out a microdrop of ink. Epson has done it a different way, with piezoelectric pulsing of the chamber behind the tiny hole. \n\n==========\npossible failure modes\n\nThe holes are relatively easily clogged, so the fineness and uniformity of the particles in it (dyes and such) are important. So is reasonable behavior when partially dried out (not being used for two weeks during a vacation, say) and when heated or subjected to considerable pressure. Hence the cleaning cycles built into many printers (see your owner's manual for some vague and normally not very intelligible instructions).\n\nInks made by a knock off artist in some backroom counterfeit lab somewhere aren't likely to have uniformly ground particles, nor probably the required witches' brew of chemicals to behave well under stress. On the other hand, some third party ink producer might indeed take sufficient care to get it right for a particular type of printer / cartridge / etc. The problem in practice to how to distinguish amongst them. \n\n========\nexperimental test\n\nSome printers have the 'print head' built into the cartridge. You get a new set of teeny tiny holes with every cartridge. With other printers, the print head is in the printer and the cartridge carries only ink. Obviously, in the latter case, a poorly made ink can be rather more expensive. \n\nI had a long policy of buying only print head type cartridge printers for exactly this reason. And I was willing to experiment with cartridges and ink from apparently trustworthy vendors because important parts of the printer wouldn't be at risk. I cannot suggest the at home refill policy unless you can do it wearing latex gloves over a slop sink. A couple of cubic centimeters of ink can go a very very long way; you don't want to find out, but the refill kit I used did work, and the cartridges could be refilled three times at least. The very cheapest way to feed the ink monster that I discovered. Not counting the ink spilled on just about everytihint that one time... But, with printers costing less than US$100 nowadays, the cost of an experiemnt gone bad is limited, except for the time and trouble of replacing the printer damaged by the bad ink. \n\n=========\nDRM measures\n\nSome printer vendors have attempted to force their users to do the right thing (ie, buy their expensive ink -- fo rtheir own quality printing good, of course) by including in their printer measures which try to detect improper cartridges and punish the user by locking the printer to some lower performance level or some other punishment. I heard of a printer which self-destructed under when it detected fake ink cartridges., but never managed to figure out which one it was. You many find that your printer won't print any better than some draft quality if you use a third party cartridge. \n\n============\nalternatives\n\nWith the street price of laser printers below US$150 for low end black and white, and under US$350 for low end color (shop around, at least in the US and you'll find them), there are lots of reasons to avoid inkjets, and their expensive thirst for those .cartridges. Unless, of course you need photographic quality with special archival inks, in which case you might have to use an inkjet.
486047
Chances are no even if you print directly to the printer most printer have internal logs of print jobs.  While they can see that you printed to a printer in most cases they can not see what you have printed.
233879
your asking for a printer to print your digital camera pictures? might i suggest a brother printer model NFC 210c under  $100.00  and works really awesome for all applications not only picture's and ink cartridges are cheap for this printer thats what i use and if you look on the web for cheap printer cartridges you will see really cheap ink
66045
I have the HP Photosmart 3210 and absolutely love it. I use mine mostly for printing photos, so I don't have the one with fax. But is super fast and has awsome quality. One of the best printers I have ever owned. The HP Photosmart 3310 is the same printer, but also has the fax. Definately worth the money, I wouldn't give it up for anything.\n\nIf you are going to use it in an office, I have the HP office jet 6210 and also love it. Not quite as much as my 3210. But this is more for an office and works great for that. \n\nIf you will be doing more photos than regular printing definately go for the 3310, if you go for the office use go for the 6210.\n\nHowever, I use my 3210 for office printing as well and it works perfectly. Prints at an amazingly fast rate. I forget to pull the tray out sometimes and it shoots paper all the way across the room.