Remeber way back when the republicans made such a big stink about Clinton for trying pot ONCE? yet they have no problem with Bushs cocaine habit? Could someone explain this to me?
127786
Democrats are able to debate and criticize those in their own party.  Republicans don't do that unless they absolutely HAVE to.  And even then, its about policies and politics not personalities.\n\nBush has supposedly been sober for years, but he still exhibits major "dry-drunk" tendencies.  \n\nDrugs and such aren't the problem, just the ammo that is used to attack people across partisian lines.  The Democrats have tact, the Republicans don't.  This is why the Left is more ethical, and also why they fail to win.\n\nFunny, but sad.
674173
yo, rock n roll.....why you think that dubba was so certain that there were WMD's.......'cause Daddy sold them to the tyrant when he was 'running the country'. and check a few more facts before you start crapping on Clinton about China, etc......he's not the one poking the big ole bear with a stick right now.....Bush is.....so, gather some facts instead of just spouting off things you heard on the street corner.  and, you know what? if I were the First Lady, i would not be sucking or blowing anybody either......\n\nClinton is getting a raw deal now because the republican based news media is shoving it down our throats while Bush golfs with Daddy every month......shut it, okay?\n\ncheck the stats of the country when big ole bad Clinton left, and check 'em now.....in my opinion, the worst thing they did was steal all the W's on the keyboards when they left office......
349070
I'm not a Conservative, nor am I brainwashed or brain-dead, but I find your statement pretty ignorant.  Kerry, the very man you're praising, disgraced his country back in Vietnam and did so again with is comments about the military.  I suggest you pull your head out of your butt and open your eyes to see what a real disgrace looks like.  Whether you like it or not, Bush did his time too and if Clinton's bj was meaningless, so is the unsubstantiated statement that Bush did cocaine.  However, the facts about Kerry are in plain sight and should be viewed for exactly what they are.....disgracing comments about Vietnam and soldiers willing to defend this country.
46036
Clinton was a far better president in a CEO sense, I have always said he was set up, or why would Monika blab to somebody that she knew didn't like him and why would she keep the dress. \n  To answer your question, yes republicans are loyal to Bush, regardless of his short comings they defend him like he was the flag. However if they were capable of looking at the facts and forming their own answer they would find Bush as incompetant as we do. He has cost to many American lives to be anything other then a criminal.
626447
Are you a liberal?  Why don't you want to cure him of his drug addiction, instead of abuse him with words?  Where is your compassion for drug offenders which your party preaches all the time?
628980
Yes I would be! His daughters don't seem to be though but I think they are probably brain dead from his evil doings in addition to their own alcohol abuse.And wasn't Ms laura bush involved in an automobile accident I think it was 1963 and because of who she was,she didn't didn't get a ticket of any kind? So I am assuming the whole dang family are a bunch of alcoholic drug addicts. But then who knows right? The one thing that just really gets my panties in a bunch.Is to see someone put on the cover of Christianity and you know exactly what they are and what they are doing it just sickens me!
460086
Research the differences between President Bush's neoconservatism and more modern conservatism.  The two are more than a little bit different.  As far as why so many Republicans are fed up with Bush, I could suggest that you ask them, but that would not answer your question.  If I were a betting person, though, I would guess that it's because he's waged the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan so poorly, he's run up huge bills our children and grandchildren will have to pay, and he has refused to accept responsibility for his failings and to remove those most responsible for providing him with bad advice.  I'd wager there are also some among the Republican camp who are concerned with his stance on civil liberties.  I'm sure there are more reasons, including the vast liability he has become on the campaign front, but those are my best guesses as an unabashed libertarian.
146216
Because this is now a republican ran country now, and as far as I can tell by reading some questions and answers on Y!answers there are still a lot of ill minded republicans morons (suzyQ, conservative) to name a couple, would rather have an oil, war criminal republican over a Democrat who got a little side action.\nDon't forget about the christian support just because king George speaks of the bible.\n\nrhymingron, Bush lied a couple more times than Clinton. Don't start comparing the honesty of Bush and Clinton. How about lying for the reason of wars, wire tapping, selling of the ports, knowing certain people for money( Bush was in a picture with someone and denies knowing him. Lies about why the fuel is so high, lies about hunting Bin Laden. Overall, edit your answer and put Bush as dishonest!!
153551
Since when is stating facts propaganda? Let's face it, the Clintons are the people who gave white trash a bad name in the first place. His value began and ended with just how entertaining he was. \nWho could forget the old "but I didn't inhale" bit? He was only elected because there was nothing good was on television back in '92, or '96 for that matter.
34846
Not quite so, here we think that the general international policy of the United States for the past century is criminal, no matter who the president. Bush just happens to be worse than the rest. Look at it this way, he has robbed from his own people with his tax reforms. So, he is not only war criminal (like most US presidents) he is also a regular criminal-- thief :) cocaine abuser and many other things you and I will never know about.\nSpain
361997
Before Bush a person could feel safe telling each other how they felt about a sitting President...are those days gone ? I will vote out of fear in november ...just like the Republicans want me to...Fear of their Party running my Country straight down the tubes!!!
459971
hehehe! holy feces! for 6 years the neoCONs have proudly proclaimed themselves to be Republicans and now that the turds are hitting the fan all of a sudden PNAC was conceived by Democrats.  people like Cheney, Pearl, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz created PNAC.  are neoCONs asserting that at one time these people were Democrats?!  give me a break.  do these people ever get nauseous from spinning so much?  i know all the slimy spinning is making me wanna puke.
615092
Why do liberals always have to "find" some sort of problem in Bush's Administration. For example, it's like when of Bush's administrators professed he was "gay" and all the Dems were on that. What I don't understand is, Dems "are for" gays yet they're criticizing Bush? Why so anti-gay all of a sudden?
448478
I am not sure but I completely thought he had the look of and addict admitting he had a problem..kind of' ...that I know this is going to be painful..but I want to quit drinkin...Look in his eye...\nWe americans did an intervention for the free world last night...\nAlso: I had your back on your last question...about the platform and plans of the party...I was adding info and I could see you were too...Our debate style is similar...very passionate about our poilitics ...Head up and Go forward....
664709
In 1939 a political party (to be identified later) funded by Unions and mobsters, had to replace the income lost with the end of prohibition. Devious! A natural product that cost virtually nothing to produce multiplies in value a thousand fold. Mobsters see unions, are back in business, with this prohibition the government has made a new class of criminal to exploit and profit from. And industries competing with hemp by products profiting as well, the only true victim were, then and are now…The Citizen. As a side note in 1900 that same political party claimed another natural plant made the “blacks” unruly and UN manageable…and they outlawed cocaine. Isn’t it interesting how those same political “families” still in politics today, made their family money as bootleggers and drug runners? If that makes you think of Kennedy’s and the Democratic Party you would be correct on both counts.
88152
IF YOU MENTION CLINTON, ALL THE REPUKES HAVE AS A COME BACK IS 'MONICA' THIS AND 'MONICA' THAT.  \n\nTHEY HATED THE CLINTON PROSPERITY THIS COUNTRY HAD.  REPUKES ARE HAPPIEST WHEN A COMPLETE FAILURE LIKE BUSH IS SCREWING OUR COUNTRY OVER.
516803
I just want to know whay did it happen the day after the Republicans lost? It is clear Bush new it was coming, and had they done it a little sooner it could have helped the Republican cause.  Dumb.  Not that I like the guy, but at least you know it was done for real reasons, more than political.