I'm referring to the quality of education and the benefits comparing the two.  It doesn't have to be ASU vs. Harvard.  It can be University of Missouri-Columbia vs. Yale
138057
Like anything else in life, you get out of it what you put in.  There are many, many successful people who didn't go to ivy league schools.  But they're also the ones who did more than what was expected of them.  The people that go the extra mile are the ones that tend to excel in whatever they wish to do.  Besides most of the folks who got into ivy league schools are there because of that extra 110 percent!
257503
The university you haver in mind is good. Check this under google.com
520328
According to my source (which cites the US News and World Report college and university survey) the most selective zoology programs are found at Harvard, University of MIchigan - Ann Arbor, and BYU-Provo.  \n\nI'd go for UM-Ann Arbor, personally -- it's more affordable than Harvard, and Michigan is mroe fun than Utah.  :)
617324
I don't know which country you live in, but Athabasca University in Canada offers a very well recognized distance undergraduate degree in education.  It is a very good university.
637677
Harvard in Massachusetts
162835
Honestly, I think each student can learn as much in Arizona and Harvard. If Arizona State University offers law school then i'm sure each student will learn the same amount as harvard because otherwise they wouldn't know they same and wouldn't be able to do their job as good and being a lawyer is a very serious issue so basically the schools would be cheating you.
145686
Harvard, Yale, Stanford, UC Berkley, or UCLA
167458
If you are a non-conformist, can study little and perform high (as you say), I would say Cornell would be the better school for you.  Perhaps Harvard is getting a bad rap, but it has developed the reputation of taking in students whose parents can (and do) buy their children's way through school.  Cornell, on the other hand, (seems to me) has a reputation of turning out students who earned their degrees more honestly - students who actually had the intelligence to be there in the first place and will have more to contribute to the world (at large) once they leave.  This, of course, may be my own delusion.  \n\nI have thought of Cornell as being a college that allows and encourages its students and professors to think freely.  Thinking freely is what creates inventions and solves (even world) problems.  Do students, who have been prepped since birth to go to a specific college, think for themselves, make good leaders, not push or pay their way through the world, care about "the little guy", not go into big business or big government for the sake of the big paycheck, have concern for the world as a whole and want to be a part of its survival? \n\nWhat type of person are you and what group do you want to be associated with?  Harvard's reputation might change; so might Cornell's.  Talk to as many people as you can who have gone to both schools - rich and poor, successful and not.\n\nYou should consider, too, the cities each college is in.  Will you be happy in the environments?  \n\nGood luck.  I know it is a tough decision.  (And, as someone else said, you can transfer...)
321934
The London Business school and Harvard Business school if you have good grades and are well rounded.oh and having money is a pus too since they're expensive. If you can get into these schools, the world is at your feet
431371
Stanford and UC Berkeley in California have good programs...
176352
Harvard has a fine course on that.The University of Florence in Italy also.
101907
Our univeristy has a great program.  Take a look at their website!  They are one of the most reasonable in MO.
267927
They are all very prestigious and fairly good at what they do.  All are fairly well respected.\n\nMIT:  THE top of the hard mathlike sciences and most Eng (eg, Comp Sci, EE, ChemE, etc).  Has fairly good liberal arts in particular philosophy and linguistics with big names.  However, MIT has never been exclusive and has no athletic scholarships, legacies, etc and suffers in overall prestige because of that.\n\nHarvard:  THE top "old boy's school".  Historically has been very exclusive with mainly legacies, donors etc adding to the prestige mystique.  REALLY good for medicine, law, etc and strong in everthing else.  If you're going for science, though, go to MIT since most students cross register and take a few courses there anyway!  It  just down the road.\n\nPrinceton > Stanford in terms of prestige.  I can't think of anyting in particular where they top the other two, but they are fairly strong and ranked up there .\n\nIf you're looking for a general undergrad experience I would go for Stanford.  It may be the least prestigous but in terms of education, it offers the best depth and breadth so you're sure to get a solid foundation regardless of what you want.  \n\nIn order I would pick Stanford > Harvard > Princeton for college/undergrad.  MIT is not included because it may not offer the best breadth, but if you're into hard science and technology, none of them can really compete.  (If you had mentioned Caltech, that might have been a different story :P).
425753
Seattle Pacific University!  It has an excellent academic reputation and has had national championships multiple times.
381455
Cornell, Colgate, Universities are the better schools.  The\n   important issues are how are you working within the \n   scholarship plans, what field of studies, what type of training\n   for what adult career do you want?
425678
MIT without a doubt.  Yes, I'm biased because I'm an alum, but I have friends at Stanford and Cal Tech who wish they were at MIT.  We're more diverse than Cal Tech (not just by race & culture, but a diversity of thought).  Honestly, for tech schools, Stanford isn't even in the running.  MIT vs. Cal Tech, MIT wins every time, including our stellar business program.
341670
There is not truly one school better than the other.  It is all in how much you want to do this and how much you can achieve in learning.  Best of luck :)