The Fcc says we cant have more than a certain amount of output power. 10 millia watts. that 10 millionth of a watt. radio stations operate on 30 thousand watts. why cant we have our freedom of speech. they dont have the pattent for the radio.
134767
You posted this in Politics & Governemnt.  WHat type of radio station do you want?\n\nRepublicans control most of talk radio, but the Democrats have Air America.  But supposedly they "control" all the newspapers.
85974
Oscillation and Modulation of waves produces FM Radio waves. Here is a site which has some good and simple circuits. But remember Transmitting Radio Waves without a license is illegal in most countries..
496878
When I ride a bike at the gym it says I generate about 100-150 watts.  Now that is enough to power a couple light-bulbs, or a computer, but only as long as you keep peddling.  It probably isn't worth researching or looking into since not enough power is being generated to be worth it.  I'm sure the ISS gets plenty of power from its solar panels.
154919
No! For me personally, it is more about the language used to express some ideas. I too have served in the military and stand for freedom of speech.It is not necessary to yell,use foul words,throw things,   destroy people or property to get your point across. Yet all too often we do.Ask why? To be a better listener is a start.
212317
Free speech is a right. It has limits. You cannot threaten people. But if you believe they are wrong or sinning, they do not have a right to not be offended, as you are neither threatening them or harming them in any way.\n\nYou cannot punish peoples' thoughts and still be a free nation. \n\nYou have no right to deny others' speech merely because you don't like it. It is not harassment. You are equally free to ignore them or refute them. But if you curtail their rights by bringing government force against them, we've all lost.\n\nThat is a path that leads to oppression of all people.
182800
http://ia300105.us.archive.org/3/items/Radioand1940/Radioand1940.mpg
44775
Because they are .... LOSERS. Hehe. I find it strange too. I used to communicate some years back by Amateur Radio, and people then seemed to be quite honest, although to be fair, Amateur Radio is only used by fans of the technology, vis-a-vis the internet which is available to all.
172601
I don't think we've ever had true freedom of speech.  For example, you've never been able to walk into a crowded theater and yell fire.  If you do, you'll get arrested for causing a disturbance.\n\nTrue freedom of speech would be being able to say what you want, when you want regardless of what happens.  Under the bush administration I do feel like we've lost some of that freedom (If you say anything anti-Bush, you are declared a terrorist or a troop basher).  Sad days, good news is he can't be in office for that much longer!
496842
Didn't you get the memo?  Freedom of speech and freedom of religion only applies to Christians.  All us non-Christians have to shut up and salute.
70483
We don't have freedom of expression.  We have free speech.  We have laws to protect this right, and laws against the things you mentioned.  The only thing missing is ethics on the part of the public.  Remember the quote:\n\n‘When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.’ \n\nThat quote from Edmund Burke in ‘Thoughts on the Cause of Present Discontents’ has, in general use, come to be delivered as, ‘The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.’ \n\nWhich ever version you prefer, the message is the same: evil will, therefore good must.\n\nPeople too often remain silent, then wonder why "Government", as if it some outside agency, does not control their lives more.  Look to your own lives and ask, "Have I been more present and active in protecting our institutions of free speech, journalism, publishing, and other media?"\n\nThat is the only way it will change, not further legislation and government paper and ink.
287468
The networks and stations that air the ads are the gatekeeper for advertisements.  They often decide something isn't fit for showing.   The FCC would step in only if there were complaints.
61485
The official answer is that the people of the USA own the radio waves, not Howard's station.   So therefore the U.S. government, allegedly acting on our behalf, can regulate what he says.   \n\nI think that's stupid, but apparently I'm in the minority - a lot of people are afraid their kids might turn on the radio and hear what he's saying (I say parents need to be responsible for that, not the nanny state!)
416935
You mean like a radio station? You can't really, Radio Station's  run their signals  on different frequencies then a wireless router.\n\nYou don't have the hardware to broadcast that high of a frequency not to mention modulate it. Like FM or AM..\n\nYou can do Internet raido..
380020
Hi amit.THis is my knowledge about how to start fm radio.Have and fun.\n\nWhether you are looking for information on how to start up a FM radio station that operates on a low power FM basis, operates on a full power frequency or alternatively streams on the internet, it is essential to first establish what the options available to you are. It is also important to understand the process for obtaining a frequency, what the licensing requirements are, and also what type of FM broadcasting equipment and studio gear you will need to run the radio station.\n\nThe following is a brief outline of some of the options that may be available. Please that not all options may be available in all countries, as license conditions do vary.\n\nWhen it comes to how to start up a FM radio station, one of the options is low power FM. This type of radio station operates at lesser power than commercial stations and so they cover a smaller area. The exact area they will cover is dependent on terrain and the exact amount of power you are permitted. Again depending on the country you live in, the low power FM service may enable you to broadcast anywhere near from 500mW to 100W, and may be license-free or alternatively it may be licensed. This level of power is sufficient to cover anywhere between a radius of a few kilometres to several kilometres.\n\nAnother option is operating a full power licensed radio station. This type of frequency will give station maximum coverage and will enable you to reach as many listeners as possible. Depending on the country you live in, there can frequently be provisions to operate on a full power frequency, but either on a commercial, non-commercial or educational basis. However, operating a full power FM radio station can be a somewhat complicated process - especially during the initial stages of determining whether there are frequencies available in your area and also costing the equipment that is needed. If you want to start up a full power FM radio station, then it is essential to get expert guidance at the earliest stage. This will ensure you get the information you need to make an informed decision.\n\nIf these options don't appeal or are not available in your area, you have one other method for how to start up a FM radio station. You are able to establish a station that streams on the internet. It will be available to a worldwide audience and can stream in your choice of format. Common formats include Winamp and Windows Media Player, although generally we recommend the latter as most people won't need to download any additional software to listen to your station. This type of radio station can use a great deal of bandwidth, so it is important to have a fast speed internet connection with a high data cap limit.\n\nWhen it comes to choosing the type of station you will set up, one of the most common constraints is budget. That said, it has been proven that a station can start out on a low power FM basis and successfully make the transition to operating a full power licensed commercial FM radio station. Some of the points to consider when looking how to start up a FM radio station include:\n\n- The process for obtaining an FM frequency and what to look out for\n\n– How many Watts you will need to achieve the broadcast coverage you want\n\n– What your obligations will be when it comes to music royalties\n\n- What specialist services you need before to assist you in submitting your application for a frequency\n\n– What is the most appropriate powered transmitter and what type of antenna would be needed\n\n– The type of radio automation software that will be used
421683
That's why movies have a rating.  I still can't figure out why so many people in America--which supposedly values freedom of speech--try so hard to suppress what they hear.  Getting offended's fine; you have the freedom to voice that opinion.  But cencorship in any form whatsoever is just plain... well, if I typed it, Yahoo would edit it, wouldn't they?
4132
Not only the power of a signal has to be considered. It is also very important the size of the antena used (the size really matters :)), With a very big parabolic anthena, you can reach farest with the same power.
124306
It's important to remember that the freedom of speech does NOT mean you can say anything, anywhere, at any time.  \n\nFirst, there are forms of speech that are NOT protected at all.  Threats and obscenity are two prime examples.\n\nSecond, freedom of speech is guaranteed in PUBLIC spaces ONLY.  Private institutions can limit speech at any time.  In fact, the Constitution says that the government cannot enact laws that limit speech.  That's the extent of the guarantee.  Private institutions may limit speech in ways they deem fit.\n\nThat's why you can be fired for complaining about your boss, for example.  \n\nIn addition, if a local restaurant doesn't want you reading some Ku Klux Klan materials, they can ask you to put it away or leave the premises.  \n\nThey can also force you not to protest in their parking lot or refuse to let you hand out political pamphlets to their customers.\n\nSo, onto academic institutions.  I THINK (not entirely sure about this) that PUBLIC academic institutions can still limit speech that they deem counter to academic goals.  (So, for example, a high school newspaper would be discouraged from publishing racist materials.)  Other than that, they cannot limit speech.\n\nPrivate institutions have no legal obligation to allow all forms of speech.  Religious universities, for instance, can demand that their students follow a behavioral code that includes speech/words that are "off limits."\n\nHope this helps!