when and where did it start and why did it start.
122331
It started shortly after the civil war in one of the southern states that was opposed to blacks getting their freedoms. It was started by a bunch of Bigots who thought they were doing good by getting rid of freemen.
674447
Yahoo answers started on December 8, 2005.\nhttp://answers.yahoo.com/info/kudos;_ylt=AmQ224iLngwtdyYXBCVkQjE_zKIX\nPlease click the above link to find detail in Kudos last paragraph of the page.
137062
Hell yah, everyone should look back to the roots of the U.S. even if it WAS DIFFERENT TIMES! It was how it originated!
318894
I would say it began because of the rising wealth and importance of the merchant class.  Though still a definitively Christian period, there seems to be an increased interest in learning about secular things.  This could also have developed because of the absence of the papacy which at the time was in Avignon, France.
424679
Yes this is how Nazi Germany began as you can see from the other answers here.
306238
It was started as sort of a joke by the Rothschilde family shortly after the American revolution, borrowing methods and rituals from other "secret orders" of the time, like the Freemasons.  Where Freemasonry was dedicated to preserving thought and knowledge despite the oppressiveness of Church rule, the Illuminati was originally a coterie of financiers that sought to progress an elitist agenda through our current system of financing loans, essentially creating a society of debt-serfs and wealthy nobles (bankers).  It is thought that the Illuminati spawned an off-shoot, the Skull and Bones, in the 1840's, of which the Bush Family and Kerry family are a part.\n\nThere has always been a conflict between these two beliefs in our society since its inception, with the Illuminates hijacking the "conservative" movement and controlling the media, with the Freemasons continuously finding new ways around them.
653405
Possibly at some time in its history. Read the linked article.
118286
About 15,000 years ago.
156941
It started with the begining of time and it is still going on today.
587437
It began when the population was low and the tribes were far from each other.  Tribes did not mix very often so developed their own language.  As nations were created lines were drawn and one language stayed on one side and the others stayed in their area.  Now that it is quite easy to travel from place to place peoples are mixing and languages are changing.  Many people speak more than one language and some several.
412746
it changed in the beginning.
184019
It's been going on for as long as humans have been dividing themselves into groups.
80779
The Sixteenth Century\nPlease see more information by clicking the link below.
324052
It all started waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay back to biblical days\nBabel is mentioned in Genesis 10:10 as the home city of Nimrod.\n\n[10] And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. [11] Out of that land went forth Asshur, and builded Nineveh, and the city Rehoboth, and Calah, [12] And Resen between Nineveh and Calah: the same is a great city. (KJV) \nAccording to Genesis 11:1-9, mankind, after the deluge, travelled from the mountain of the East, where the ark had rested, and settled in 'a plain in the land of Shinar' (or Sennar). Here, they attempted to build a city and a tower whose top might reach unto Heaven, the Tower of Babel.\n\nThe Origin of Languages\nThe all-wise Creator, Jehovah God, has employed language in the heavenly angelic realm. (Job 1:6-12; 1 Corinthians 13:1) When he created humans, he implanted in them a vocabulary and the ability to expand it. There is no evidence of any primitive human language consisting of grunts and growls. On the contrary, consider what the Encyclopædia Britannica explains about Sumerian, the oldest known written language: "The Sumerian verb, with its . . .various prefixes, infixes, and suffixes, presents a very complicated picture."\n\n\nAt Babel, God confused the language\nof rebellious humans\n\nAbout the 20th century B.C.E., contrary to God's command to spread out and "fill the earth," humans made an effort to control all society at the Plains of Shinar, in Mesopotamia, and began building the religious Tower of Babel. Language diversity originated when God confused their common language, thwarting their dangerous and hurtful plans.—Genesis 1:28; 11:1-9.\n\nThe Bible record does not say that all languages descended from the original one. At Shinar, God introduced many new vocabularies and thought patterns, resulting in a variety of languages. Thus, efforts to trace a parent language from which all others developed have been in vain.\n \n\nLanguage is a divine gift. (Exodus 4:11) The fascinating process of change in language shows how flexible this gift is. We may also learn from language that no one group of people is superior to another, for there is no such thing as an inferior language. Just as with other divine gifts, language is equally available to all people, no matter what their culture or the place where they live. Since the very beginning, languages of all peoples have been complete enough to serve their purpose. Each one of them is worthy of respect, regardless of how many people use it.\n\nHistorical and Social Factors\nThe gregarious nature of mankind is reflected in language. Thus, when there is contact between cultures—a common occurrence—the languages of those cultures retain evidence of such contact for generations.\n\nFor instance, through its many words of Arabic origin, Spanish, considered a modified version of Latin, retains a record of the eighth-century Muslim conquest of Spanish territory. The influence of Greek, French, English, and other languages on Spanish can also be traced. Moreover, in the Spanish spoken in America, traces remain of the ancient inhabitants of the continent. For example, Spanish there contains many words from the Nahuatl language of Aztec Central America.\n\nJust as a mother tongue identifies individuals with a certain nation and even with a region, language usage can identify people with a group, such as a profession, a trade, cultural and sports groups, or even criminal organizations. The list is practically endless. Linguists call these special variations jargon or slang or sometimes even a dialect.\n\nHowever, when there are animosities between nations and ethnic or cultural groups, language ceases to be a bridge. It can become a wall that adds to the divisions between people.\n\nThe Future of Languages\nCommunication is a complex matter. On one hand, the modern tendency is toward breaking down linguistic walls, primarily on account of mas
245789
No one did every body started doing it in world war II.\nTo get the full story go to the[exact] website below.
151964
It wasn't really one band that started metal, it was a bunch of movements and bands over time that were eventually brought together to form what we now call metal. If you meant who came first, they started the same year, however black sabbath was not originally called black sabbath, and originally played heavy blues rock and moved into metal a few years later. Metallica didn't start until well over a decade later.
161578
America started from a pretty bland group of Protestents who came here to get away from discrimanation in England or were shipped here as slaves (endentured servents and people from debter's prisons). Hessions who stayed after serving as mercs in the revolutionary war only reinforced this make up. Then came the aquisition of French and Spanish lands as well as large imigrations of Jewish and Catholic settlers. Before these people groups like the Dutch were minorities and suffered the same treatment that the Irish, Italians, freed slaves, and so on suffered when they first broke into American society. \n\nSo the "old blood" money formed a WASP type social structure to keep out unwanted Catholics, Jews and other ethnic groups. This formed the base group which ironically forms the core today of the "liberal" leadership. \n\nThe so called conservitive movement started as a sort of Farmer's rebellion against the corruption and lack of rural representation found in the Gov around the time of the cival war. It was born of the same problems which caused the South a mostly rural area to suceed from the union. Sorry slavery was a minor issue in the cival war. Abe Lincoln was the first Republican elected president. The Whig party disapeered almost overnight. Many of them becoming either democrats or republicans. \n\nNew money had arisen during the intervening years. The railroad barons, Catholics and Jews who had struck it rich, often initially with ilegal enterprises, imigrants from other nations who came here with money. They lived a work ethic and it became the "American dream" while the Democrats remains a party of the old blood and Whites in the South who hated the Republican party for winning the cival war and dozens of other issues. \n\nThis is pretty much where things sat for most of 50 years. The Democrats eventually lured over labor to it's party. Certain ethnic groups like the Irish and Jews who worked the docks and other interests found themselves lined up with teh Democrats who's old money leadership was trying to strike down the new money. By accident alot of good things happened in the process of the two sides fighting this war. Better wages and workplace safety being a couple of those things. \n\nToday it's still a battle between old blood and new blood money. Added to it are quite a few special interests. Big corps and small biz tends to be "conservitive". The WASP churches found affinity with Republicans while the Catholic church found affinity with the Democrats. However down the road the Democrats catered to many other groups almost forcing the Catholic church into Republican boundries with an anti-Christian flavor that took hold in the 60s. \n\nSo theologically the so called "liberals" denounce religion officially but strongly favor anti-Christian religions or the lack of religion. Part of this was the failure of the US comunist party and the movement of Comunists into the Democratic party. Comunists as a fundemental plank are athiests. Comunism officially sees religion as a form of oppression. An Opiate of the masses to quote Marx. The adoption of the Democratic party and large scale conversion to Islam by many Blacks furthor added to this. \n\nRepublicans got a swelling of Christian support as a result and suddenly they became charged with protecting Christianity, especially Protestent Christianity. Republicans welcomed the Christian factions then and still do today though they are smarting from the actions of some televangilists and some of the extreme views found in the more fanatical Christian churches. \n\nAs for values. That is not a thought in the head of either party. They will run up slogans but these are purely to satisfy various factions within their party. Both liberal and conservitive have lost all sight of the meaning of the constitution. Both pretend to fight for upholding various sections of the US Constitution. For example in issu