Did you agree with the reasons he have presented?
131852
No, it seemed obvious that he did not want to do anything that would hurt the oil and energy companies. Most scientists (except energy "experts") had enough evidence to indicate that  the world needs to act now.\nThe idea that we should have more research I believe was a ploy to put off doing anything that would hurt the corporations.\nIt also was consistent with the administration's hostility toward any world agreements, such as Kyoto and the U.N. \n\nUnfortunately, this is one area where world-wide cooperation is important, but I don't see it happening.
234812
yes. i do agree with u.
182691
he is alive and I've got some evidence...see it all makes sense one you check the link below\n\nIt all makes perfect sense
363370
yes, it is concise, to the point, and opens the door for you to give reasons WHY.  good job.
521909
I was inclined to support the action, because the president and a large majority of each house of congress did:\n\nhttp://hnn.us/articles/1282.html
366094
I agree. He understands the historical perspective. He views politics as history. Although he has baggage, his ideas for fundemental reform of our governmental institutions are worthy of discussion. As to the idea of blowing Liberal BS away, I believe that he has the ability to confront it and provide an alternative that large segemnts of the population agree with already.
44205
you had  answered your qustion!
46831
NO but he was willing to make a deal
581495
I dont trust him.  He's never followed the courts decisions or the law on anything else, if it conflicted with what he wanted to do.  Just look at his signing statements.
662990
The man presented solid evidence supporting what we all know to be true - the corruption of our government. Why is it that we allow this to continue. Why doesn't somebody pull them down to their knees. Has it always been that way. Is that why?\nWe can be that blink to what is happening now and what has happened in the past. This is frightening to think that we have ALL been had.
620133
If he wished it, you definately have the right.
383451
None of the above - thank him for his opinion and go ahead and vote anyway.\n\nYou cannot reason with idiots.\n\nGlad you are interested in the elective process.
481788
No.\n\nBut now that you brought it up....
92903
yes are you satisfied
654997
Yes!  check out my source and see if you agree.
312961
There are a few things that he's doing correctly - see my answer in the "Global Warming - For Real?" question - but the Iraq fiasco overshadows them all.  I would have\n\n1)Concentrated on Afganistan (duh)\n2)Concetrated on North Korea and Iran\n3)Told Colin and then Condi to have a proposal for a triangulation strategy regarding China, N. Korea and Iran on my desk within 48 hours\n4)Maintained federal grants for therapuetic embryonic stem cell research\n5)Kept 500 miles and a nuclear - sorry, nucular - bomb squad between me and the Terri Schiavo debate\n6)Realized my mandate after re-election was to resolve Iraq instead leaving it to future presidents, instead of trying to resolve Social Security now instead giving at least the next five administrations a chance to do\n7)Told Karl off when he suggested turning gays into the new hot button issue - because, after Iraq, did we really need another one?
416015
i like what that guy said... it sounds right. doesn't it??