What two words define vegitarian?
137950
I HAVE TWO TWO WORD ANSWERS.\n\n1.practices vegetarianism. \n2.A herbivore.
32533
We wouldn't eat meat if we weren't meateaters. Vegetarians are following a fad, not their instincts. \nWhat is the Indian word for bad hunter? Vegetarian!
505686
What is the difference between a fruit and a vegetable?\nThe technical definition of a fruit is the (often fleshy) part of a plant that surrounds the seeds. By this definition, tomatoes, apples, pumpkins, eggplants, squashes, rose hips, peppers, peapods, cucumbers, and corn kernels are all fruits. All other edible plant parts are considered vegetables. Lettuce, carrots, and spinach are examples of vegetables.\n\nThe popular definitions of fruit and vegetable are somewhat different from the technical definitions. Most people categorize "vegetables" as foods that are eaten as part of a meal's main course and "fruits" as foods that are eaten for dessert or as a snack.\n\n\nThe difference between a fruit and vegetable depends largely on your perspective. From a botanical perspective, a fruit is the mature ovary of a plant, such as an apple, melon, cucumber, or tomato. From the common, every day "grocery store perspective," we tend to use the word fruit with respect to fruits eaten fresh as desserts - apples, peaches, cherries, etc. - and not to items cooked or used in salads. So, tomatoes tend to be lumped in with vegetables because of the way they are used (cooked and in salads), but botanists will call them fruits because they develop from the reproductive structures of plants. The California legislature once passed a law declaring tomatoes a vegetable in order to impose a tariff on Mexican imports!
218685
look in the dictionary\n\npanda: eats, shoots and leaves
669492
This one is better!\n\nhttp://www.venganza.org/
39157
i think the answer is "positional" however that is only one word. you sure its two words?
16004
umm...do you mean slant??\n\nvertical, horizontal, and slant should be it.
480211
Eat other veggies. Only eat recommended portions. Eat fruit.
607590
PETA = "People Eating Tasty Animals"\n\n☺
498026
alternate passionate  nativity marinate obstinate fortunate unfortunate vaccinate  resonate abomination combination incriminate procrastinate eliminate ornate donate unattractive nation termnate inseminate  opinionated coordinate signature\n\nwhew...... my brain hurts....... hope you get an "A" and  this was tough for 2 points!
225277
Phytology would be the root word, the first two are:\nPhytotechnology\nPhytopathology \n\nThe last two are:\nparasiticides\nagricultural valuation
601826
Rational, sane, thinking, inquisitive, ...\n\nAgnostic is the term you seek.\n\nFor a better appreciation of the evolution of the term, you\nmay want to read more on "gnosticism."  \n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnosticism\n\nI note that several posters already answered your question, and a link has been furnished for agnosticism.\n\nI felt you may gain insight through reading on the topic of gnosticism.\n\nHope it all helps.  \n\nThirst for knowledge.
529853
Thank you!\n\nNo, mushrooms are not vegetables.  They are not even plants by any sense of the word.  They do not photosynthesize, they do not seed or bear fruit.  They have just as much (or as little depending if you are a glass half full or half empty person) in common with animals as they do plants.\n\nSpeaking of definitions, a vegetable is not defined by what you find in a salad.  A vegetable refers to the part of a plant that is not directly involved the reproductive cycle of that plant.  A fruit on the other hand is not defined as some sweet that you can put in a cake or serve with ice cream, rather it is the part of the plant that is the result of the reproductive cycle and carries the plant embryo (seed).\n\nExamples:\ntomato = fruit\navocado = fruit\ncoconut = fruit\npinecone = fruit\nbanana = debatable... flower?\ncinnamon (bark) = vegetable\nblade of grass = vegetable\na piece of 2x4 = vegetable\n\n\nEconomically, as mentioned by the answerer above, an edible mushroom can be classified as "food" but not vegetable, fruit, or meat. \n\nEcologically, you can lump a mushroom in with bacteria, mold, worms, maggots, vultures, hyenas, and any other scavanger that comes to mind.
283910
A Breatharian is someone who believes that food (and possibly water) are not necessary for human sustenance. Breatharians claim that the body can be sustained solely by prana (the vital life force in Hinduism), or according to some, by the energy in sunlight.\n\nBreatharianism or inedia may also refer to this philosophy practiced as a lifestyle in place of the usual diet. While it is often seen as an esoteric practice performed by eastern ascetics, recently some groups such as the Breatharian Institute of America have promoted the practice as an option for anybody, once the proper techniques for accessing it are made known.\n\nCurrent scientific theories about nutrition and generally accepted common sense both indicate that a person who followed this practice in the long term would die of starvation (if abstaining from food) or dehydration (if abstaining from food and water). Breatharians have seldom submitted themselves to medical testing and currently there is no evidence to support their claims.
489436
PETA / THINK \n\nThat"s an oxymoron
625980
AVANDIA, ACTOS,GLUCOPHAGE, GLUCOVANCE,  \nHUMALIN, HUMALOG
159089
OK break out your dictionary:\nliberal:\na-Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry. \nb-Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded. \n\nI am a liberal. I volunteer at food pantries and soup kitchens. I donate to Habitat for Humanity and the Salvation Army. Most of these groups are run by Christian organizations, although I don't consider them conservative.\n\nLet's define conservative:\na-Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change.\nb-a supporter or advocate of traditional ideas and behavior\n\nWhich of these 2 definitions fits better with "helping your fellow man"? I think it fits better with liberalism, (Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, free from bigotry) not conservatism (tending to oppose change).\n\nThe reason "liberals" complained about Bush's Supreme Court picks is because they were afraid of what these people would do to the Constitution and Bill of Rights if given the chance.\n\nPick up a history book sometime. Remember who championed the Civil Rights movement? Kennedy - a liberal democrat. Who started Social Security? FDR - a liberal Democrat. Who started Habitat for Humanity? Jimmy Carter - a liberal Democrat. Notice a pattern here?