USA claims that CIA is super. Then why they failed to analyse that Iran had Atomic Bombs and they could and would blackmail the world with the Weapons of Mass Destructions. When they could fund the Rougue Countries for carrying out Jehad, they can handover the manufacturing technology of dirty bombs to all the jehadi outfits located in Malayasia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia(another funing source), Pakistan occupied Kashmir,Borders neighbouring Afganistan, Left out Talibanis in Afganistan Etc.
136393
Iran hasn't even claimed they have an Atomic weapon yet.  They only announced today that they can enrich uranium.  they still have work to do to get the bomb.
228400
Well, it is a double standard. They started the war because of "weapons of mass destruction", where are these weapons? I am sure America have more weapons of mass destruction in their own country, in fact the USA is the only country who has ever used such weapons (Japan). It is obvious that it is not about sorting out the Middle East, because now there are even more problems over there. Either Bush is "Satan", or just plain stupid. Or a mixture of both.
343776
Most likely. They are double dealing and they will get burned for that. Look what happened when Afghanistan not only supported but protected the Taliban. Pakistan needs to stop being friendly to terrorists while pretending to support our war on terror. I dont know why they are allowed to have nuclear weapons.
347978
They need something over there to be bombed.  I think a few cruise missiles are in order simply to wake up ahmadinejad and scare the sheet out of him.  There must be some actions and repercussions for what they are doing.  If there aren't, why would they ever stop?  It needs to be done now BEFORE they have a nuclear arsenal.  Same goes for north korea.
71951
Well A good question but not enough . Why is america caring about the whole world who gave the authority to america to bully around its only the nuclear and the latest mass destuction weapons it has that all those leading the country are shameless people can do anything for money and oil ..... They got a new issue to occupy the whole world by saying we love democracy and they kill every one who oppose them .. Even if some one ask for its own right and that is against the american policy he is surely in deep trouble belive me u can get enough evidence for this ... They killed million in afghanistan only as they wanted to hunt couple of 100's qaeda people who are so called sponsors of 9-11 attack. killed millions in iraq saying iraq is having mass destruction weapons so do u america y dont u get the hell out of arabs place and let us leave in peace ... when USA got exposed that no mass destruction weapon is there in IRAQ the fools tried to lie again saying we wanted to librate iraqis from saddam ... and now wants to stay in iraq as it fears iran could invade it and then supply lot of weapons to israel to eliminate iran and arabs around living in the horrors of israel ... lol funny this is that killing million in the name of al qaeda i dont no till when YOu america will tell lies to your people ...... shame on you ...
344321
Russia wanted Middle East oil alright, but they did it through legally negotiated contracts.  You know, *capitalism*, the thing the US claims to promote?  Then along comes the US, invading Iraq and tearing up legal contracts by forcing a puppet Iraqi government to sell oil (at a cut rate) to the US, effectively stealing Iraq's oil.\n\nMeanwhile, the US does nothing about Israel's well documented nuclear weapons yet makes a big deal out of a non-existent threat from Iran.  If any country in the Middle East _would_ use a nuclear weapon against another country, it's Israel.  Just look at the last 50 years of US-paid atrocities they've perpetrated.  \n\nAnd don't forget, the Gulf Stream goes west to east, so the radiation from an Israeli nuclear weapon would land on a half-dozen islamic countries plus China and India. \n\nIf you think Israel isn't that callous about other people's lives, ask the Lebanese about the million or more cluster bombs left unexploded in their country.  The US and Israel have refused to supply any money to defuse and remove those bombs; instead, Lebanon and the UN will spend billions of dollars clearing land over the next decade.\n\nAnd by the by, it was the US government which posted, on the internet, the technical specifications for building a nuclear weapon.  For more than TWO WEEKS, US government scientists protested and pleaded for the information to be taken off the website.  The Shrub Whitehouse said "No".\n\nDoes anyone _really_ believe anymore that Shrub _isn't_ working collectively with Osama?  (The Shrub and bin Laden families have been doing business for 20 years.)\n\n\n.
163314
Under Bush anything is a possibility.\nProbably even nuking them.\nFrom Bush's track record, we can see that he cares less for humn lives that are non-American.\nHe would certainly try to nuke them if the need arises.\nPakistan has no reason to nuke Iran. Wrong guess.\nthis might brighten up some of your participants....read on:-\n\nDecember 28, 2005  \nNuking Iran With\nthe UN's Blessing \nOnly the American people can stop it  \nby Jorge Hirsch \nIn the "global war on terror," Iran is the next target, having been designated by the U.S. State Department [.pdf] as "the most active state sponsor of terrorism" in the world. The United Nations has given its blessing, and the U.S. will fill in the blanks. \n\nBefore we analyze this, however, let us ask ourselves: why not Florida instead? In fact, Florida should be way ahead on the list. Family considerations should not play a role in U.S. policy decisions. \n\nLet's compare the cases. For Florida: \n\n\nAt least 15 of the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers had Florida connections. \nThirteen of the 19 were in Florida before Sept.11. \nEight of the hijackers took flying lessons in Venice, Fla. \nFive of the hijackers trained in Florida gyms. \nTwo of the hijackers got drunk in a Hollywood, Fla. bar a few days before the attack. \nInstead, the connections between 9/11 and Iran are much more tenuous, according to the 9/11 Commission: \n\n\n"Senior al-Qaeda operatives and trainers traveled to Iran to receive training in explosives" in 1993. \n"Iran facilitated the transit of al-Qaeda members into and out of Afghanistan before 9/11, and some of these were future 9/11 hijackers." \n"We have found no evidence that Iran or Hezbollah was aware of the planning for what later became the 9/11 attack." \nThe 9/11 hijackers used planes, not explosives. So I very much hope that the Pentagon is revising its Nuclear Strike Plan. A precision-guided missile with a nuclear warhead – or a low-yield nuclear gravity bomb – should be effective in vaporizing both aboveground and underground facilities of Huffman Aviation School in Venice, Fla., with minimal collateral damage. \n\nThe fact is, terrorists do not need "state sponsors" to do their job. The 9/11 hijackers lived in the U.S., rented apartments, opened bank accounts, got drivers licenses, rented cars, took English lessons, had jobs, joined gyms, learned the needed flying skills, bought their box-cutter knives, and blew themselves up in the good old United States. And so will the next terrorists who strike us. \n\nFurthermore, some of the 9/11 hijackers lived and studied in Hamburg, Germany. And they met in Madrid. So are Hamburg and Madrid next on the strike list? \n\nDoes anybody really believe that the "training camps" in Afghanistan played any significant role in 9/11? Can somebody please explain what exactly the 9/11 hijackers learned at those training camps that they couldn't learn elsewhere? \n\nDoes anybody really believe that the purported meeting, which in fact never took place, of Mohamed Atta and an Iraqi intelligence officer in Prague would have played a significant role even if it had taken place? \n\nYet we are embarked in a "global war of terror" in response to the 9/11 attacks that has led to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and is about to lead to a U.S. nuclear attack against Iran. \n\nBecause make no mistake, an aerial attack on Iran that will include low-yield nuclear bombs is the next step in the "global war on terror," unless something extraordinary happens to derail it. \n\nThe "Legal" Framework \n\nThe United States invaded Iraq under the pretext of enforcing UN Security Council resolution (UNSCR) 1441. Bush stated in his address to the nation on March 17, 2003, \n\n"On November 8th, the Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 1441, finding Iraq in material breach of its obligati
648059
Nah possibility of a nuclear war with nations is slim but if a terrorist group were to get their hands on a nuke weapon then all bets are off. That's why Iran nuke program must be verifiable before they are allowed to have one - they sponsor terrorism (hezbollah, hamas, etc)
70904
From the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, it sounds like they need alot of upgrading.  They don't have as many nukes targeted on the USA as i had thought, although one would be enough.
245729
The Iranian leadership appears to advocate violence to other states as a matter of doctrine. There have been speeches by the leadership promising to wipe Isreal off the face of the map.\n\nIran is not averse to supplying arms to other groups to go and further their political aims. The idea that they may also supply terrorists with even low grade Uranium for use in a dirty bomb is not a pleasant thought.\n\nIran has supplied arms to Sunni muslims in Southern Iraq before. Iran supports Hezbollah terrorists and pays money to suicide bombers families. One of the first acts after the revolution was to sieze the American embassy and hold staff hostage. Iranians took hostages at their own embassy in London.
112229
They have been at civil war in the middle east on some level, since before recorded history. It is their way of life. They teach their children to butcher people. They have killed each other with sticks, spears, machine guns, and bombs. If Iran has its way, they will soon be killing with the atom!
178393
I think Iranian government(which is separate from its people) is developing Nuke Weapons (in their own words) to promote Islam in other countries. This is one of their goals. I think U.S and other countries must be aware that this regime doesn't care about it's own people, and so they don't care about anyone in the world. \nIran is one of the richest oil nations, but look how their citizens are living!!!! all the money form oil exports are in their own bank accounts in foreign countries.\nDo you know how many political prisoners are in prisons in Iran!!! They kill, torture and do lots of stuff that you can't imagine. \nI think the first thing U.S and other countries can do is to freeze their assets and money in banks.  some of them(people in Iran Regime) has Green card and travel to U.S. if Bush means what he says how they can travel to his country so easily.\nIranian people has nothing to do with all this. Why they should pay the price. All these things you see in T.V that some people are supporting them, these are their own people and they are paid to be there. \nBut in my opinion they should try to resolve the problem in a way that Iranian people pay the least price.
68511
No where, if US or UN or any pfficial organizations could find such things Iran was scene of war today.\nIran claim to doing its nuclear program for peace is totally true, problem rise from the fact that if Iran be able to do full enrichment cycle it can be used for a nuke.\nIt is also known that CIA during Clinton has given Iran blueprints for making a nuke(For God knows reason)\nIranians insist on doing it, they have many reasons, one of them is western countries have refused to give Iran enriched Uranium even when they sign contracts to do so.
429322
Get your head out of the sand,dummy!  The US is not interested in any other country except those that mean harm to it or it's allies who the US has an obligation to protect.  If you mean other countries like Iran, N.Korea, Syria, Venezuela, I would be glad to explain each scenario, but I won't because you simply will not understand or will refuse to listen.\n\nSo, stay stuck on stupid and if you would like a better explanation, please re- phrase your question in a manner that makes it more palatable.
549668
As a signer to the nuclear NPT, Iran has the RIGHT to enrich uranium for power plant fuel. As the CIA and IAEA documents have stated over and over- time after time, there is ZERO evidence that Iran is even seeking weapons. The only people who say they are is BushCo (the people most interested in manufacturing a reason to invade and steal their oil). Bush is counting on Americans not knowing the difference between "weapons" grade and "fuel" grade uranium enrichment (TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT THINGS). The IAEA and CIA both know that IRAN is complying with the NPT. War mongering Bush is desperately making up outrageous reasons to invade...and I wouldn't put a FALSE FLAG OPERATION past him.\n\nInteresting fact: Israel isn't a signer of the NPT yet has an assload of nuclear bombs.....hmmmm.
322748
From another country no from terrorists maybe.\n\nThe reason behind another country not using a nuclear weapon is that if a nuclear missile is launched against the US then it will launch one back causing a cycle of strike and counterstrike which will end in nuclear winter. \n\nFrom terrorists maybe because of the fact they are not based in a single country and part of a countries organisation it would be hard to track them down. It is hard to get hold of enough nuclear matiriel to make a bomb without being found out by any intelligence service th CIA would catch on immediatly I think. You would also need research labs, and alot of buildings to make a nuclear weapon terrorists would find it hard to get all the nessecary equipment. CIA, MI6 etc would all be watching for things like that.\n\nChemical and Biological agents are easier to get hold of so that possibilty is more realistic but again that would be hard to do as intelligence services would be watching for these things.\n\nNo is the answer in my opinion chemical attack is more likely. Terrorists attacks of the same are much more likely.
5814
It is not known where Bin-Laden is, but it is true he is often believed to be in Pakistan. \n\nPakistan is not necessarily cooperating with the US. On a large scale, they are. But at the local levels, there is widespread sympathy for Bin-Laden and terrorists. Remember that Pakistan is near many of the Middle Eastern trouble spots- Palestine, Afghanistan, and Iraq. \n\nFor a clear example of what I mean, recall the al-Zarqawi near-capture. Pakistan's troops surrounded a village believed to house al-Zarqawi, the number one man in the Iraq insurgency. US politicians and military leaders asked to send American troops to capture him. Pakistan refused. A day later, when the Pakistan Army moved in, they found Zarqawi had escaped through their lines. This could not have happened without sympathizers. Also, the fact Pakistan refused to cooperate shows shaky loyalties.\n\nYou are right in saying Iran is very hostile. But everyone is watching Iran because of nuclear weapons now, and Iran knows it. They are fanatics, but they are not stupid. I doubt Iran would want the immense world pressure of housing Bin-Laden, because no country REALLY wants an all-out war with the United States of America.\n\nI think, also, that questioned villagers in Afghanistan are mostly indicating that Bin Laden is in Pakistan. \n\nRemember, civilians are not told everything. I bet the CIA and military intelligence has a lot more data on Bin Laden than we do. US troops conduct regular sweeps for terrorists in Afghanistan, and their information brings us steps closer to finding the mastermind of 9/11.