Liberal media ? Yeah right!
138949
Republicans can't blame anyone for what is going on but themselfs! They have full control and this is the first time in the history of the us that they do. THIS IS A FACT, Most things are voted out if a Repub does not want it. So who is to blame the repubs this is why every thing is so wrong in our country. It is time for change and I don't know who can change this but anyone would be better then who we have now. The country is a mess and who is to blme the repubs no one else!!!
675481
All of the mainstream media are liberal. Most are from the Woodward and Bernstein era. In their foggy minds they are all just about to expose the next Watergate.\n Most of these people are mentally disabled from dropping acid at Woodstock. In their deluded minds they're all just trying to stick it to the man or blame it on the system dude. In the back of their closets they still have their tie dyed Che Guevara T's and a dog eared copy of Chairman Mao's little red book.\nIn truth they hate America and everything it stands for. In a liberals upside-down mind anything that is normal or traditional is wrong and anything is freaky, kinky, or subversive is correct.\n\nSo what is the truth anyway. \nWell the way I see it is this.\nThe Republicans are right about half the time.\nBut the Democrats are always Wrong.
118003
Sure. For example, FOX News tends to be very conservative, and support most Republicans. On the other hand, the new York Times is quite liberal and its editorials often criticize the Bush Administration, while the Washington Times is a more conservative newspaper.\n\nTalk radio is also dominated by conservatives (Limbaugh, Hannity, Dr. Laura, etc), while "mainstream media" like CNN and ABC tend to be moderately left-wing.
488291
I am a Liberal, but the political correctness has truly gotten out of hand, it is to the point now where it actually infringes on freedom of speech, and that is what we are all about defending!
567889
Don't be sad. It makes me laugh when people throw the word "liberal" around like it's an insult. "You...you...LIBERAL, you." Not quite on par with calling someone a m*therf*cker, is it?
172421
They use words like "The U.S. once again has...." because the U.S. once again HAS...... The media seems to be more to the left because most journalism is liberal. It has to be or it would be judging everybody. O.K. seriously, most mainstream news doesnt report good things because good news isnt interesing. Do you remember when Clinton was in office they were just as rough on him. That is the job of the media, to investigate and report. Maybe it seems they are reporting a lot of bad because there is. If you are looking for righty news try a.m. talk radio stations, its what my husband does.
674947
You are a true liberal. And an even bigger idiot!
457066
the media is liberal which equals democrats\n\nnot republicans\n\nEDIT:  The only republican media, is basically AM radio, and Fox News, everything else is liberal
652611
wait a minute.  who are these "Libs so gung ho for War?"  i'm certainly no liberal, but i know, and tolerate, somewhat, a number of self-proclaimed liberals.  by the same token, i know and tolerate, somewhat, a number of conservatives (who are mostly embarrassed these days).  all these folks, which i regard as friends and associates have one thing in common.  they are against the war.  they mostly feel they've been lied to by a government they want so much to support.  now personally i knew bush was lieing when i saw his lips moving.  now of course i've been prooven correct.  that doesn't make me feel any better.  this war is a tragedy.  \n\nas for your commentary on main stream media, you describe it as "their MSM media."  i take it you see the media as liberal?  where have you been?  main stream media is anything but liberal. when was it?  sure there have been a few liberal types who had columns, perhaps a few television talking heads, but media is big business, and in so many cases is unabashed state propaganda.  you should thank your god that there are liberals in the media.
518005
How come, a person who is crying because they are scared of what might happen, are calling liberals "wussies"?  \n\nI guess this is what happens when you continue to follow STUPID!\n\nBTW. . .WWJD?\n\nFarzand A:  It is a fact that "ALL MEDIA" is biased depending on ones particular view.  Which is why everyone and anyone should seek as many different sources possible to gain information.  \n\nI check many sources (using the Internet) to see through the eyes outside of this country, as it pretty obvious that every U.S. news station will tend to protect this nation (and it is understandable).  While our constitution states we have freedom of the press, the press is free to report the news as the owners see fit.  It does not guarantee that it has to be reported straight up and with no holds barred.\n\nToday the ignorant stay ignorant by choice, however, stupidity is a Birth Right and no amount of knowledge can help them. . .In this forum it is difficult to tell the two apart, and the whole concept that a 45 is the best solution,  proves my point.
426211
FOX News........nuff said.
579642
I know the previous answerers will not probably read my answer so its meaningless to direct it to them, but to their claim that the media is liberal, here is my rebuttal:\n\nFirst, the media companies are not non-profit organizations. There aren't that many diverse news/media companies in the first place and those that do exist are under a few corporate umbrellas that donate to the Republican party. The people who run these companies are rich, privileged men. They are also pretty intelligent. They are not as stupid as Ann Coulter. So they keep a low profile and they let their company take the garb of being liberal. Wolf in sheep's clothing, shall we say? The "bias" is kept "liberal" for a reason. I mean come on, if you went all out and claimed the media companies to be conservative would anybody trust them anymore? Yeah right! So this is a very subtle move which my republican friends do not have the acumen to understand. So you build trust among the liberals by pretending to be their friend, and slowly build up your case. These are not foolish people after all.\nSecond continuing on the thought of corporations that exist for profit: who gains when these news companies make money? When you watch the news, buy the magazines? I don't. I am sure most of you don't either. The owners and executives do. And what is the political affiliation of the executives of these companies?\nI will let you look up Michael Ganzi of Hearst Corp. (that owns Popular Mechanics amongst a host of other publications), Rupert Murdoch of News Corporation (Fox, Harper Collins), John Engler (member of Board of directors of Dow Jones, Republican governor of Michigan) to name a few. These are people to make the decisions how and what to publish through various media. Just these 3 companies Hearst, Fox and Dow Jones control an ENORMOUS segment of the media industry. AND they are all republican controlled.\nThird, these businessmen are not stupid. If they produced ONLY left wing news then the right wing wouldn't buy it. If they produced only right wing news then the left wing wouldn't buy it. And that would hurt half their business. So they spread their products evenly, some left, some right. New York Times right, New York Post left... just mix it up, have people buy it, get the checks from the bank. And if you can mix in a little controversy, by making a leftist slant, then it will sell more!!\nEventually where does the buck stop? At the executives' desk. And they are all right wingers (I prefer wrong wingers as a better descriptor).\n\nAnyways, I am sure my republican friends wouldn't understand all this logic. They are simple minded people and don't really follow the intricate ways the GOP top brass think and act.\n\nSo how do we counter the right wing media?\nUse the Internet. Blogs, personal news, word-of-mouth is the new face of news. The printing press ushered in Renaissance and was instrumental in the dissemination of ideas by people like Voltaire, Locke, Rousseau, Descartes etc.. that led to the French Revolution and eventually emancipated Europe and America. I say the Internet is the printing press of this age. Blog, write, disseminate. There are some intelligent republicans who do this as well. But most of them are not there yet. The liberals at least have that one advantage: of education. Put it to good use.
133597
No, the media is not liberal per se.  Most reporters, when polled about their personal politics, usually espouse "liberal" ideas.  These ideas being things like "homosexuals are human beings,"  "poor people are human beings," and "women have the right to choose."  Reporters usually espouse liberal ideas when it comes to social issues.  However, when it comes to economic issues, reporters usually espouse a slight conservative bend.\n\nNow, the important part of the media equation is not the reporters, but the editors and owners of the various media outlets.  Editors and owners tend to be conservative.  And it is ultimately the editors and owners that decide what gets put into the news.\n\nMost of the news is fairly centrist.  That's because the news is a business, and the owners of the newspapers and television programs want to get as many readers and/or viewers as possible.  In order to do that, they need to appeal to liberals, conservatives, and centrists.\n\nThe idea of a "liberal media" is a conservative invention.  It is a useful strategy to get across the conservative agenda, because conservatives can yell "not fair!" and demand more air time. \n\nMost political commentators in the media are conservative.
269258
hooray for ignorance! \n\nMarxism and liberalism are polar opposites. Jesus H Christ you people need to do some research.\n\nOh..and newsmax doesn't qualify as a source of any sort.
312368
Yea...the media reporting all of the death and violence in Iraq is all part of their dirty liberal plot to make ignorant americans vote democrat.  \nDo you people honestly believe this?\nSeriously take your paranoia medication and WAKE UP. \nAs if the headline in the NYT was "Bush responsible for all of the evils in the world"\nMaybe the "liberal" media should have reported something before the war....like there are Sunnis and Shites and they don't like each other.\n\nThere is now a civil war that the US caused.  Any ideas on how to fix it?\n\n\nOh yea you can be paranoid about something....\nThe Dems will be in power soon and we're gonna \n\nLegalize everything\nRaise taxes....especially republican peoples taxes\nDump money into education and healthcare\nFix the deficit...like we did during the last administration\nMake religion illegal\nGet rid of marriage\nKill God...again\ndistribute porn and condoms and sex manuals in public schools\noh yeah and i'm pretty sure we're gonna impeach george\n\nand because we're dirty communists we're gonna drape the country in red and put a hammer and sickle where the stars used to be\n\n\n\nBE AFRAID CAUSE THE COMMIES ARE COMMIN AND ITS ALL CAUSE OF THE LIBERAL MEDIA\nAHHHHHHHHHHH
89598
Liberal news.\n\nLeft serving media would rather have the "Bush Bash" value.
541456
A liberal worried about morals? give me a break!