reviewers are blinkered by bibliometrics?
309770
Reviewers are blinkered by bibliometrics. Science panels still rely on poor proxies to judge quality and impact. That results in risk-averse research, say Paula Stephan, Reinhilde Veugelers and Jian Wang.
911525
Although arXiv is not peer reviewed, a collection of moderators for each area review the submissions; they may recategorize any that are deemed off-topic, or reject submissions that are not scientific papers, or sometimes for undisclosed reasons.
792192
An editor ensures that the researcher's opinions are best presented with an impact quality of the drafting whereas a peer reviewer, belonging from the same research area, can further advise him regarding the research.
226132
Scholarly journals are appropriate for academic research whereas popular magazines provide information for the general public. ... Articles submitted to scholarly publications are often reviewed by an independent panel of experts and are referred to as peer reviewed or refereed.
888748
Not to mention your first authorship paper is not very good by your own evaluation. In the end, each paper counts. ... It's always good to have another paper, even if you are second author. A hiring or review committee may ask you to describe your own contribution to the paper.
1263720
Although peer-reviewed journals are always scholarly in nature, scholarly journals are not always peer-reviewed. Scholarly journals are research-focused, reporting the results of original research and experimentation.
708386
However, there is a difference. Performance reviews tend to have a development bias while appraisals focus more on achievement of objectives – in reality we need to balance both, which is something the marketing jargon doesn't usually explain!
1252866
If you check out professional reviewers, they do their reviewing anonymously, because if they're writing reviews for the general public, they shouldn't get special treatment but should be treated like anyone else, otherwise that leads to reviews being inaccurate & not so helpful!
1245115
Empirical research is published in books and in scholarly, peer-reviewed journals.
511216
Results show that higher levels of slack lead to higher levels of innovation. No evidence is found for either a negative or curvilinear relationship.
51498
Are books peer reviewed? "Peer review" is the editorial process that scholarly articles go through before they are published in a journal. Since not all books go through the same editorial process before publication, most aren't peer reviewed. They can be still be good scholarly sources, though.
175702
Some of these might be reputable (for example, the Washington Post or the New York Times), but they aren't scholarly either. These sources can still have applications in academia!
1146169
['1.Duplicate Submission. ... ', 'Falsification/fabrication of research data. ... ', 'Plagiarism. ... ', 'Authorship Conflict. ... ', 'Conflict of interest.']
208585
Peer review involves subjecting the author's scholarly work and research to the scrutiny of other experts in the same field to check its validity and evaluate its suitability for publication. A peer review helps the publisher decide whether a work should be accepted.
1014028
Reviewers may not take materials from peer review and use them without attribution. If your application is funded, NIH makes the title and abstract public through RePORTER . You should not put confidential or proprietary information in those sections.
1147268
Although peer-reviewed journals are always scholarly in nature, scholarly journals are not always peer-reviewed. ... However, whereas peer-reviewed journals require a strict "peer-approval" for publishing, a scholarly journal that is not peer-reviewed only requires the approval of an editorial board.
955986
Elite reviewers don't get paid for reviews, not directly. However, they will often get invited to free events, where restaurants and bars show off new products and promote themselves. The idea is that Elite reviewers have considerable sway, so companies will go out of their way to convince them.