is resy better than opentable?
316446
Resy is far smaller than OpenTable, which has more than 20 times as many restaurants on its platform, but it has been chipping away at the incumbent's lead. ... OpenTable also charges either 25 cents or $1 for each reservation it makes. Restaurants have to choose between the two providers.
537485
A cheap way to do this is to use Angular to generate a <table> and use FileSaver. js to output the table as an . xls file for the user to download. Excel will be able to open the HTML table as a spreadsheet.
177119
EaseUS data recovery is quite old software. Safe in the sense it is not a snake oil. There is not much value of recent images taken at home. Highly valuable data needs experts to recover than trying in DIY way.
991104
Leventhal and Gary Vaynerchuk launched Resy in June 2014. The booking service app is now in 80 participating restaurants in New York and Los Angeles. For serious foodies, Resy could be described as a godsend. Linked to a credit card, it doesn't cost anything to sign up for a Resy account and download the app.
867688
['Select File > Options.', 'In the Access Options dialog box, select Current Database.', 'Under Application Options, select the Compact on Close check box.', 'Select OK.', 'Close and reopen the database for the option to take effect.']
1069270
Hbase is faster when compared to Hive in fetching data. Hive is used to process structured data whereas HBase since it is schema-free, can process any type of data. Hbase is highly(horizontally) scalable when compared to Hive.
1035618
Unlike the VBA language used in Excel, data analysis using Python is cleaner and provides better version control. Better still is Python's consistency and accuracy in the execution of code. Other users can replicate the original code and still experience a smooth execution at the same level as the original code.
1383671
JHipster is good code generator, though I would not recommend it to use in production. The problem is that a lot of things that look amazing at the first stage in real world become a pain. With JHipster too much is happening on behind the scene.
116835
SQL Server is a case-sensitive back-end application. This means that a table named "addr" is distinguished from a table named "ADDR." However, because Microsoft Query is an MS-DOS-based application, it is unable to distinguish cases; therefore, Microsoft Query views "addr" and "ADDR" as the same file.
81726
2 Answers. You can do insert into new_table ( select * from old_table ) . But for bigger tables you should always do unload from old table then copy to new table. The copy commands load data in parallel and it works fast.
299637
['Reduced data redundancy.', 'Reduced updating errors and increased consistency.', 'Greater data integrity and independence from applications programs.', 'Improved data access to users through use of host and query languages.', 'Improved data security.', 'Reduced data entry, storage, and retrieval costs.']
782870
Datapump gives 15 – 50% performance improvement than exp/imp. Export and import can be taken over the network using database links even without generating the dump file using NETWORK_LINK parameter. CONTENT parameter gives the freedom for what to export with options METADATA ONLY, DATA, BOTH.
775175
['Amazon Redshift.', 'Microsoft Azure.', 'Google BigQuery.', 'Snowflake.', 'Micro Focus Vertica.', 'Teradata.', 'Amazon DynamoDB.', 'PostgreSQL.']
497607
['Extract the query from the codebase.', 'Replay the query with an explain plan. EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM test; Hash Anti Join (cost=57.26.. 96.69 rows=53 width=31) (actual time=0.702.. ... ', 'Optimize the query. In our case, we only had a few changes to apply for a significant impact:']
869057
Use CLEAR and FREE for workarea, and REFRESH and FREE for internal table. Clear deletes the content of a work area, REFRESH deletes the lines of an internal table. Now, the difference between FREE and the others, is in the fact that FREE liberts memory that was allocated for the internal table or workarea also.
188851
rsync is much faster than cp for this, because it will check file sizes and timestamps to see which ones need to be updated, and you can add more refinements. ... You can also use rsync to copy or sync files to a remote machine, or make is run as a daemon. Humble cp can't do such fancy things.
838936
There should be no performance difference between a Basic and Dynamic disk. Unless when you are using the spanning feature of dynamic disk that will reduce the performance of the diskset you are using as there will be some overhead. As to why, it is a design decision by Microsoft we can only speculate about.