what are the arguments for and against majority verdicts?
318387
Other arguments against majority verdicts include that they compromise the criminal standard of proof of "beyond a reasonable doubt", given that at least one juror has a doubt; create a greater risk of convicting the innocent, leading to miscarriages of justice; and reduce public confidence in jury verdicts.
1418815
['(1) Clarity or Definiteness: ... ', '(2) Brevity: ... ', '(3) Comprehensiveness: ... ', '(4) Flexibility: ... ', '(5) Declaration of rights: ... ', '(6) Independence of Judiciary: ... ', '(7) Directive Principles of State Policy:']
545585
If the jury cannot agree on a verdict on one or more counts, the court may declare a mistrial on those counts. A hung jury does not imply either the defendant's guilt or innocence. The government may retry any defendant on any count on which the jury could not agree."
768688
A well-known maxim instructs that justice should be seen to be done. When “seen” is understood in the sense of “observed”, the maxim is easily defended: open court proceedings protect against arbitrary and partial decisions.
1134911
Jurors may be dominated by two or three strong minded individuals in the jury. It is a fact that juries acquit proportionately more defendant than the magistrates do.
1099382
Answer Expert Verified. The major difference between a majority opinion and a concurring opinion issued by the Supreme Court is: A majority opinion presents the official reasoning behind the Court's ruling, while a concurring opinion offers different reasoning.
1266349
['Brings Justice For Extreme Crimes. ... ', 'Courts Focus On Age Instead of Crime. ... ', 'Mature Mental Ability Begins Much Earlier. ... ', 'Juvenile Crime Is On The Rise. ... ', 'The Right to a Trial By Jury. ... ', 'Put Young Offenders At High Risk. ... ', 'Message of Lost Hope. ... ', "Judges Don't Have Much Variety For Punishment."]
842725
Arguments against mandatory sentencing include: (1) sentences are often greatly disproportionate to the severity of the offense; (2) the focus on particular kinds of offenses has tended to have a major negative impact upon certain categories of offenders and particular social groups; (3) removing discretion from judges ...
129939
Describe the three kinds of opinions a Supreme Court justice may write about a decided case: majority opinion, dissenting opinion, concurring opinions.
190898
['Fundamental worth of every person. everyone is worthy of being part of our democracy.', 'Equality of all persons. everyone has equal opportunity and legal equality, regardless of gender, religion, or race.', 'Majority rule and Minority rights. ... ', 'Necessity of compromise. ... ', 'Individual Freedom.']
909323
The Death Debate Those in support of capital punishment believe it deters crimes and, more often than not believe that certain crimes eliminate one's right to life. Those who oppose capital punishment believe, first and foremost, that any person, including the government, has no right to take a life for any reason.
628525
["It's the ultimate denial of human rights. ... ", "It doesn't deter crime. ... ", "It's irreversible, and mistakes happen. ... ", "It's often used within unfair justice systems. ... ", 'It discriminates. ... ', 'It can be used as a political tool.']
376377
These debate limitations and debate- limiting devices generally prevent a minority of the House from thwarting the will of the majority. House rules also limit debate in other important respects. First, all debate on the floor must be germane to whatever legislative business the House is conducting.
1026012
An opinion is a judgment, viewpoint, or statement that is not conclusive, rather than facts which are true statements.
992693
The criminal justice system would likely collapse if every case went in front of a judge and/or jury. But critics argue that the push to resolve cases through plea bargains jeopardizes the constitutional rights of defendants, who may be pressured to admit guilt whether they are guilty or not.
1188863
Summary judgment is awarded if the undisputed facts and the law make it clear that it would be impossible for one party to prevail if the matter were to proceed to trial. The court must consider all designated evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the summary-judgment motion.
994011
A jury trial allows for the experiences and brains of multiple people before a verdict is rendered. In a bench trial, it is solely the judge who decides the case.