is a peer review important?
313590
Peer Review: Why is it important? ... Peer review involves subjecting the author's scholarly work and research to the scrutiny of other experts in the same field to check its validity and evaluate its suitability for publication. A peer review helps the publisher decide whether a work should be accepted.
169974
As for whether anki is necessary, it is not BUT it all depends on how you learn. most people end up relying heavily on it. but i know people who got 250+ without anki. ... The most important part about anki is making sure you keep up with all of your reviews otherwise the system is worthless.
624108
Peer review is a critical part of the process. A systematic review looks at evidence reported in peer-reviewed journals and the systematic review itself is peer-reviewed. The evidence is rigorously reviewed, using the same manner and standards that were used to produce the evidence.
1035029
A good literature review will result in a series of logically connected arguments that support the research question. The need to make arguments in relation to the literature, not just review existing literature, results in a different approach to writing.
762087
PLOS ONE, PeerJ and other open access peer reviewed journals are coming as the best alternative academic publications to the conventional journals. There is debate going on which one is better, the image of IMPACT FACTOR is also controversial.
1276706
Critical reading. It is important to read critically. Critical reading requires you to evaluate the arguments in the text. You need to distinguish fact from opinion, and look at arguments given for and against the various claims.
579844
"Scientific opinion" may reflect opinions on scientific concerns as articulated by one or more scientists, published in scholarly journals or respected textbooks, both of which entail peer-review and rigorous professional editing. ... In other circumstances, a particular scientific opinion may be at odds with consensus.
494955
Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials are key to the practice of evidence-based medicine, and a review of existing studies is often quicker and cheaper than embarking on a new study. Contrastingly, systematic reviews of observational studies rank lower in the evidence-based hierarchy.
911525
Although arXiv is not peer reviewed, a collection of moderators for each area review the submissions; they may recategorize any that are deemed off-topic, or reject submissions that are not scientific papers, or sometimes for undisclosed reasons.
620763
medicine and knowledge translation. Systematic reviews (SR) represent a cornerstone of research synthesis and require scientific rigour. Nevertheless, SR are often criticised as secondary research and not granted the status of original research. Journal editors are gatekeepers in the publication process.
141662
Yes, review articles are peer-reviewed! It's a common enough misconception that, because an editor has already given an article (or at least its topic and outline) the green light to submit, reviews don't need to be reviewed and are simply accepted as a matter of course.
854899
The systematic review is ideal for research topics that are broader in nature and have been studied from that broader perspective by many scholars. The critical review is applicable in studies where there are contradictory views of different scholars on a particular research topic.
1077430
Prior to publication, articles are submitted and go through a rigorous assessment that involves review and approval by the author's peers (experts in the same subject area). ... Peer reviewed journals publish articles only if they have passed through the official editorial process.
739330
Peer-reviewed (refereed or scholarly) journals - Articles are written by experts and are reviewed by several other experts in the field before the article is published in the journal in order to ensure the article's quality. (The article is more likely to be scientifically valid, reach reasonable conclusions, etc.)
1360323
The literature review is important because: • It describes how the proposed research is related to prior research in statistics. It shows the originality and relevance of your research problem. Specifically, your research is different from other statisticians. It justifies your proposed methodology.
1064866
['define your topic and provide an appropriate context for reviewing the literature;', 'establish your reasons – i.e. point of view – for.', 'reviewing the literature;', 'explain the organisation – i.e. sequence – of the review;', "state the scope of the review – i.e. what is included and what isn't included."]
40699
Peer-reviewed (refereed or scholarly) journals - Articles are written by experts and are reviewed by several other experts in the field before the article is published in the journal in order to ensure the article's quality.