how accurate are heart rate monitors for calories burned?
19166
Fitness trackers accurately measure heart rate but not calories burned. A Stanford inquiry into the accuracy of seven wristband activity monitors showed that six out of seven devices measured heart rate within 5 percent. None, however, measured energy expenditure well.
1369017
The Apple monitor was the most accurate of the wrist devices at all paces. For example, at 9 mph, the Apple monitor was off by 1.5 beats per minute, compared to almost 3 beats per minute for the Garmin. ... Research published in 2016 also found the Apple watch to be more accurate than several other wrist-worn devices.
182165
While some types of cardio machines are more accurate than others, none of them will be 100% accurate. In general, they overestimate your calorie burn by 15% to 20% because they can't account for all the individual factors involved in calorie-burning.
199841
Wrist-based heart rate monitors are certainly less cumbersome than those with a chest strap. But they're also less accurate, especially as you run faster, and some models can be off by several beats per minute, according to new research.
642436
The most accurate device for checking your heart rate is a wireless monitor that's strapped around your chest. It reads out to a fitness tracker worn on your wrist. Digital fitness trackers worn on the wrist, at-home blood pressure machines, and smartphone apps are less accurate than checking your heart rate manually.
1009730
The study that examined step tracking accuracy also looked at estimated calorie burn. Researchers found that the fitness trackers predicted energy expenditure within 8% while the research subjects were sedentary — but the trackers' accuracy degraded when people started moving.
447834
Heart rate can be used to estimate caloric burn during certain exercise conditions because of the relationship between heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake (VO2) that occurs during steady-state aerobic exercise. It is actually VO2 that is the most direct way to measure caloric expenditure.
393999
The "British Journal of Sports Medicine" found that various types of commercial heart-rate monitors could have errors from 20 to 50 beats per minute when a person is walking or jogging on a treadmill. Proper placement and use of the heart-rate monitor will better your chances of obtaining an accurate pulse measurement.
31167
One study found that the Fitbit Surge had the most accurate calories burned calculation among a group of similar devices, with an error rate just over 25%. The other similar devices tested had comparatively higher error rates – up to as much as 93%.
262126
The Polar heart rate monitor, by comparison, returned 99 percent accurate correlation across all of the activities tested. Accuracy while measuring heart rate isn't the same as measuring the amount of calories burned.
1247184
A 2018 study in the BMJ Open Sport and Exercise Journal found absolute error values of 3.3% to 6.2%, but using a “10% equivalence zone,” concluded that the watches were accurate. You can see why that is a problem for athletes if you think about using the heart-rate monitor to stay below aerobic threshold (AeT).
945317
Recently, researchers at the University of Zaragoza in Spain, published a paper showing that RR intervals extracted from the Apple Watch while using the Breathe app, are indeed very accurate (Hernando et al., “Validation of the Apple Watch for Heart Rate Variability Measurements during Relax and Mental Stress in ...
59307
They were accurate at resting rates in the test, but couldn't keep up with rapid heart rates either. The Samsung Galaxy S5 phone comes with a built-in optical sensor to sense fingertip pulse and was accurate even at a heart rate of 190.
109311
Alta HR Calories Burned Accuracy (Personal Experience) Tl;dr: I found that my Fitbit Alta HR overestimates calories burned by 10% on average. ... Basically, Fitbit said I burned 2500 but i really burned 2250.
1448481
The study included 108 patients who had their heart rate measured by ECG, pulse oximetry, and each app using each phone. The researchers found substantial differences in accuracy between the four apps. In some apps there were differences of more than 20 beats per minute compared to ECG in over 20% of the measurements.
392297
Charge 3: Heart rate accuracy The Charge 3 had an average heart rate for the session of 146bpm compared to 145bpm on the chest strap/Fenix, and a max of 184bpm across both. That's pretty good accuracy. Of course, Garmin does a better job.
203322
The app tracks your pulse and estimates how many calories you burn with each workout. ... It also ties into the Health app on iPhone, which can monitor vitals like your pulse using the Apple Watch's sensors. Over time, you can get a pretty good snapshot of your activity and progress.