Spaces:
Runtime error
Runtime error
Commit
·
3f86dc6
1
Parent(s):
85200e9
model output
Browse files
app.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -180,14 +180,12 @@ st.markdown("## Try it out!")
|
|
| 180 |
|
| 181 |
# select climate claim
|
| 182 |
option_claim = st.selectbox('Select a climate claim to test', ex_df['claim'].unique())
|
| 183 |
-
st.write('You selected:', option_claim)
|
| 184 |
|
| 185 |
# filter df to selected claim
|
| 186 |
filtered_df = ex_df[ex_df['claim'] == option_claim]
|
| 187 |
|
| 188 |
# select evidence
|
| 189 |
option_evidence = st.selectbox('Select evidence to test', filtered_df['evidence'].unique())
|
| 190 |
-
st.write('You selected:', option_evidence)
|
| 191 |
|
| 192 |
st.markdown("Now, we can use your selected (claim, evidence) pair in the fine-tuned transformer!")
|
| 193 |
|
|
@@ -213,7 +211,7 @@ with torch.no_grad():
|
|
| 213 |
pred_label = 'refutes'
|
| 214 |
|
| 215 |
# write out
|
| 216 |
-
st.write("**is**",
|
| 217 |
st.write("**with**", option_evidence)
|
| 218 |
|
| 219 |
# clean up true label
|
|
@@ -224,7 +222,7 @@ with torch.no_grad():
|
|
| 224 |
true_label = "supports"
|
| 225 |
else:
|
| 226 |
true_label == "refutes"
|
| 227 |
-
|
| 228 |
st.write("**The correct relationship is**", true_label)
|
| 229 |
|
| 230 |
# section 6: analysis
|
|
@@ -232,7 +230,7 @@ st.markdown("## Critical Analysis")
|
|
| 232 |
st.markdown("What else could we do?")
|
| 233 |
st.markdown("* Given more data, the performance of the model can be greatly improved. This is just a proof of concept")
|
| 234 |
st.markdown("* This is only one small part of the puzzle!")
|
| 235 |
-
st.markdown("In the complete pipeline (from user input to final output), we could move from just outputting evidence to training a transformer to reply with persuasive evidence. That is, instead of simply saying, \"This claim is supported by this evidence\", the model could transform the evidence into a persuasive argument, thus combatting climate change misinfo in a more platable and convincing way.")
|
| 236 |
|
| 237 |
|
| 238 |
# References + Resource Links
|
|
|
|
| 180 |
|
| 181 |
# select climate claim
|
| 182 |
option_claim = st.selectbox('Select a climate claim to test', ex_df['claim'].unique())
|
|
|
|
| 183 |
|
| 184 |
# filter df to selected claim
|
| 185 |
filtered_df = ex_df[ex_df['claim'] == option_claim]
|
| 186 |
|
| 187 |
# select evidence
|
| 188 |
option_evidence = st.selectbox('Select evidence to test', filtered_df['evidence'].unique())
|
|
|
|
| 189 |
|
| 190 |
st.markdown("Now, we can use your selected (claim, evidence) pair in the fine-tuned transformer!")
|
| 191 |
|
|
|
|
| 211 |
pred_label = 'refutes'
|
| 212 |
|
| 213 |
# write out
|
| 214 |
+
st.write("**is**", pred_label)
|
| 215 |
st.write("**with**", option_evidence)
|
| 216 |
|
| 217 |
# clean up true label
|
|
|
|
| 222 |
true_label = "supports"
|
| 223 |
else:
|
| 224 |
true_label == "refutes"
|
| 225 |
+
|
| 226 |
st.write("**The correct relationship is**", true_label)
|
| 227 |
|
| 228 |
# section 6: analysis
|
|
|
|
| 230 |
st.markdown("What else could we do?")
|
| 231 |
st.markdown("* Given more data, the performance of the model can be greatly improved. This is just a proof of concept")
|
| 232 |
st.markdown("* This is only one small part of the puzzle!")
|
| 233 |
+
st.markdown("* In the complete pipeline (from user input to final output), we could move from just outputting evidence to training a transformer to reply with persuasive evidence. That is, instead of simply saying, \"This claim is supported by this evidence\", the model could transform the evidence into a persuasive argument, thus combatting climate change misinfo in a more platable and convincing way.")
|
| 234 |
|
| 235 |
|
| 236 |
# References + Resource Links
|