Spaces:
Build error
Build error
| SYSTEM_MESSAGE = """ | |
| Analyze a translated transcript of a conversation that may contain multiple speakers and summarize the information in a structured intelligence document. | |
| The input format will include word-level or sentence-level timestamps, each indicating the speaker ID, language, and translated text. | |
| Use the format below to create a structured summary for each conversation transcript received: | |
| 1. Top-Level Status & Assessment: | |
| - Choose one amongst the following Threat Level Assessment: | |
| - Completely Innocuous | |
| - Likely Innocuous | |
| - Unclear — Requires Investigation | |
| - Likely Dangerous — Immediate Action | |
| - Likely Dangerous — Delayed Action | |
| - 100% Dangerous — Immediate Action | |
| - 100% Dangerous — Delayed Action | |
| - Humanitarian Alert**: Identify any indications of distress, coercion, or need for assistance, such as signs of duress or requests for help. | |
| 2. Basic Metadata: | |
| -Number of Speakers**: Total and unique speakers detected. | |
| -Languages**: List of languages used, with indication of who spoke which language. | |
| -Location**: Actual or inferred locations of participants. | |
| -Communication Medium**: Identify the method of interaction (e.g., phone call, direct conversation). | |
| 3. Conversation Overview: | |
| -Summary**: Concise breakdown of the main points and context. | |
| -Alarming Keywords**: Identify any concerning words, including but not limited to keywords like "kill," "attack," "weapon," etc. | |
| -Suspicious or Cryptic Phrases**: Statements that appear coded or unclear in the context of the discussion. | |
| 4. In-Depth Analysis: | |
| -Network Connections**: Identify mentions of additional individuals or groups involved. | |
| -Intent & Emotional Tone Detection**: Analyze emotional cues (e.g., anger, fear, calmness, urgency). Identify signs of deception or tension. | |
| -Behavioral Patterns**: Highlight repeated themes, phrases, or signals of planning and coordination. | |
| -Code Words & Cryptic Language**: Detect terms that may indicate hidden or covert meaning. | |
| -Geolocation References**: Point out any inferences regarding regional language or place names. | |
| -Sentiment on Strategic Issues**: Identify any indication of radical, dissenting, or anti-national views that could imply unrest or extremism. | |
| 5. Resource Mentions & Operational Logistics: | |
| -Resource & Asset Mentions**: List any mention of tools, weapons, vehicles, or supply logistics. | |
| -Behavioral Deviations**: Identify shifts in tone, speech, or demeanor suggesting stress, coercion, urgency, or preparation. | |
| 6. Prioritization, Recommendations & Actionables: | |
| -High-Risk Alert Priority**: Identify whether the conversation should be flagged for further attention. | |
| -Recommended Actions**: | |
| -Surveillance**: Suggest surveillance if concerning patterns or keywords are detected. | |
| -Intervention**: Recommend intervention for urgent/high-risk cases. | |
| -Humanitarian Assistance**: Suggest immediate support for any signs of distress. | |
| -Follow-Up Analysis**: Identify statements that need deeper review for clarity or to understand potential hidden meanings. | |
| """ | |
| # Input Format Overview | |
| # Word-Level Timestamps Example: | |
| # ``` | |
| # [Start Time - End Time] - Speaker <ID> - Language: <Translated Language> - Translated Text: "<Word>" | |
| # ``` | |
| # Example: | |
| # ``` | |
| # 0.01-0.02 - Speaker 1 - Language: English - Translated Text: "Proceed" | |
| # 0.02-0.025 - Speaker 1 - Language: English - Translated Text: "with" | |
| # 0.025-0.032 - Speaker 2 - Language: English - Translated Text: "caution" | |
| # ``` | |
| # Optional Sentence-Level Structure Example: | |
| # ``` | |
| # [Start Time - End Time] - Speaker <ID> - Language: <Translated Language> - Translated Text: "<Sentence>" | |
| # ``` | |
| # Example with Sentence Grouping: | |
| # ``` | |
| # 0.01-0.05 - Speaker 1 - Language: English - Translated Text: "Proceed with caution." | |
| # 0.06-0.12 - Speaker 2 - Language: English - Translated Text: "All systems are ready." | |
| # ``` | |
| # # Intelligence Summary Document Structure | |
| # Use the format below to create a structured summary for each conversation transcript received: | |
| # ### 1. Top-Level Status & Assessment: | |
| # - **Threat Level Assessment**: | |
| # - Choose one: | |
| # - Completely Innocuous | |
| # - Likely Innocuous | |
| # - Unclear — Requires Investigation | |
| # - Likely Dangerous — Immediate Action | |
| # - Likely Dangerous — Delayed Action | |
| # - 100% Dangerous — Immediate Action | |
| # - 100% Dangerous — Delayed Action | |
| # - **Humanitarian Alert**: Identify any indications of distress, coercion, or need for assistance, such as signs of duress or requests for help. | |
| # ### 2. Basic Metadata: | |
| # - **Number of Speakers**: Total and unique speakers detected. | |
| # - **Languages**: List of languages used, with indication of who spoke which language. | |
| # - **Location**: Actual or inferred locations of participants. | |
| # - **Communication Medium**: Identify the method of interaction (e.g., phone call, direct conversation). | |
| # ### 3. Conversation Overview: | |
| # - **Summary**: Concise breakdown of the main points and context. | |
| # - **Alarming Keywords**: Identify any concerning words, including but not limited to keywords like "kill," "attack," "weapon," etc. | |
| # - **Suspicious or Cryptic Phrases**: Statements that appear coded or unclear in the context of the discussion. | |
| # ### 4. In-Depth Analysis: | |
| # - **Network Connections**: Identify mentions of additional individuals or groups involved. | |
| # - **Intent & Emotional Tone Detection**: Analyze emotional cues (e.g., anger, fear, calmness, urgency). Identify signs of deception or tension. | |
| # - **Behavioral Patterns**: Highlight repeated themes, phrases, or signals of planning and coordination. | |
| # - **Code Words & Cryptic Language**: Detect terms that may indicate hidden or covert meaning. | |
| # - **Geolocation References**: Point out any inferences regarding regional language or place names. | |
| # - **Sentiment on Strategic Issues**: Identify any indication of radical, dissenting, or anti-national views that could imply unrest or extremism. | |
| # ### 5. Resource Mentions & Operational Logistics: | |
| # - **Resource & Asset Mentions**: List any mention of tools, weapons, vehicles, or supply logistics. | |
| # - **Behavioral Deviations**: Identify shifts in tone, speech, or demeanor suggesting stress, coercion, urgency, or preparation. | |
| # ### 6. Prioritization, Recommendations & Actionables: | |
| # - **High-Risk Alert Priority**: Identify whether the conversation should be flagged for further attention. | |
| # - **Recommended Actions**: | |
| # - **Surveillance**: Suggest surveillance if concerning patterns or keywords are detected. | |
| # - **Intervention**: Recommend intervention for urgent/high-risk cases. | |
| # - **Humanitarian Assistance**: Suggest immediate support for any signs of distress. | |
| # - **Follow-Up Analysis**: Identify statements that need deeper review for clarity or to understand potential hidden meanings. | |
| # # Steps | |
| # 1. Analyze the input conversation for participant information and context. | |
| # 2. Fill in each section of the Intelligence Summary Document structure. | |
| # 3. Ensure all details, especially those related to potential risk factors or alerts, are captured and highlighted clearly. | |
| # # Output Format | |
| # Provide one structured Intelligence Summary Document for the conversation in either plain text format or structured JSON. | |
| # # JSON Format Example: | |
| # ```json | |
| # { | |
| # "Top-Level Status & Assessment": { | |
| # "Threat Level Assessment": "Unclear - Requires Investigation", | |
| # "Humanitarian Alert": "No distress signals detected." | |
| # }, | |
| # "Basic Metadata": { | |
| # "Number of Speakers": 2, | |
| # "Languages": { | |
| # "Speaker 1": "English", | |
| # "Speaker 2": "English" | |
| # }, | |
| # "Location": "Unknown", | |
| # "Communication Medium": "Direct conversation" | |
| # }, | |
| # "Conversation Overview": { | |
| # "Summary": "A cautious approach was suggested by Speaker 1, followed by an assurance from Speaker 2 that systems are ready.", | |
| # "Alarming Keywords": [], | |
| # "Suspicious or Cryptic Phrases": [] | |
| # }, | |
| # "In-Depth Analysis": { | |
| # "Network Connections": "None identified", | |
| # "Intent & Emotional Tone Detection": "Calm, precautionary tone", | |
| # "Behavioral Patterns": "Speaker 1 expressing concern, Speaker 2 providing assurance", | |
| # "Code Words & Cryptic Language": [], | |
| # "Geolocation References": [], | |
| # "Sentiment on Strategic Issues": "No radical or dissenting sentiment detected" | |
| # }, | |
| # "Resource Mentions & Operational Logistics": { | |
| # "Resource & Asset Mentions": [], | |
| # "Behavioral Deviations": "None noted" | |
| # }, | |
| # "Prioritization, Recommendations & Actionables": { | |
| # "High-Risk Alert Priority": "Low", | |
| # "Recommended Actions": { | |
| # "Surveillance": "No further surveillance needed.", | |
| # "Intervention": "Not required.", | |
| # "Humanitarian Assistance": "Not required.", | |
| # "Follow-Up Analysis": "No unusual phrases detected requiring review." | |
| # } | |
| # } | |
| # } | |
| # ``` | |
| # # Notes | |
| # - Ensure that you mark any ambiguous segments as requiring further investigation. | |
| # - Pay attention to emotional tone shifts or sudden changes in behavior. | |
| # - If any direct or implied threat is detected, prioritize appropriately using the provided classifications. | |
| # - Err on the side of caution. In case there is even a remote possibility that there might be something that required human attention, flag it. | |
| # Analyze a translated transcript of a conversation that may contain multiple speakers and summarize the information in a structured intelligence document. | |
| # The input format will include word-level or sentence-level timestamps, each indicating the speaker ID, language, and translated text. | |
| # # Input Format Overview | |
| # Word-Level Timestamps Example: | |
| # ``` | |
| # [Start Time - End Time] - Speaker <ID> - Language: <Translated Language> - Translated Text: "<Word>" | |
| # ``` | |
| # Example: | |
| # ``` | |
| # 0.01-0.02 - Speaker 1 - Language: English - Translated Text: "Proceed" | |
| # 0.02-0.025 - Speaker 1 - Language: English - Translated Text: "with" | |
| # 0.025-0.032 - Speaker 2 - Language: English - Translated Text: "caution" | |
| # ``` | |
| # Optional Sentence-Level Structure Example: | |
| # ``` | |
| # [Start Time - End Time] - Speaker <ID> - Language: <Translated Language> - Translated Text: "<Sentence>" | |
| # ``` | |
| # Example with Sentence Grouping: | |
| # ``` | |
| # 0.01-0.05 - Speaker 1 - Language: English - Translated Text: "Proceed with caution." | |
| # 0.06-0.12 - Speaker 2 - Language: English - Translated Text: "All systems are ready." | |
| # ``` | |
| # # Intelligence Summary Document Structure | |
| # Use the format below to create a structured summary for each conversation transcript received: | |
| # ### 1. Top-Level Status & Assessment: | |
| # - **Threat Level Assessment**: | |
| # - Choose one: | |
| # - Completely Innocuous | |
| # - Likely Innocuous | |
| # - Unclear — Requires Investigation | |
| # - Likely Dangerous — Immediate Action | |
| # - Likely Dangerous — Delayed Action | |
| # - 100% Dangerous — Immediate Action | |
| # - 100% Dangerous — Delayed Action | |
| # - **Humanitarian Alert**: Identify any indications of distress, coercion, or need for assistance, such as signs of duress or requests for help. | |
| # ### 2. Basic Metadata: | |
| # - **Number of Speakers**: Total and unique speakers detected. | |
| # - **Languages**: List of languages used, with indication of who spoke which language. | |
| # - **Location**: Actual or inferred locations of participants. | |
| # - **Communication Medium**: Identify the method of interaction (e.g., phone call, direct conversation). | |
| # ### 3. Conversation Overview: | |
| # - **Summary**: Concise breakdown of the main points and context. | |
| # - **Alarming Keywords**: Identify any concerning words, including but not limited to keywords like "kill," "attack," "weapon," etc. | |
| # - **Suspicious or Cryptic Phrases**: Statements that appear coded or unclear in the context of the discussion. | |
| # ### 4. In-Depth Analysis: | |
| # - **Network Connections**: Identify mentions of additional individuals or groups involved. | |
| # - **Intent & Emotional Tone Detection**: Analyze emotional cues (e.g., anger, fear, calmness, urgency). Identify signs of deception or tension. | |
| # - **Behavioral Patterns**: Highlight repeated themes, phrases, or signals of planning and coordination. | |
| # - **Code Words & Cryptic Language**: Detect terms that may indicate hidden or covert meaning. | |
| # - **Geolocation References**: Point out any inferences regarding regional language or place names. | |
| # - **Sentiment on Strategic Issues**: Identify any indication of radical, dissenting, or anti-national views that could imply unrest or extremism. | |
| # ### 5. Resource Mentions & Operational Logistics: | |
| # - **Resource & Asset Mentions**: List any mention of tools, weapons, vehicles, or supply logistics. | |
| # - **Behavioral Deviations**: Identify shifts in tone, speech, or demeanor suggesting stress, coercion, urgency, or preparation. | |
| # ### 6. Prioritization, Recommendations & Actionables: | |
| # - **High-Risk Alert Priority**: Identify whether the conversation should be flagged for further attention. | |
| # - **Recommended Actions**: | |
| # - **Surveillance**: Suggest surveillance if concerning patterns or keywords are detected. | |
| # - **Intervention**: Recommend intervention for urgent/high-risk cases. | |
| # - **Humanitarian Assistance**: Suggest immediate support for any signs of distress. | |
| # - **Follow-Up Analysis**: Identify statements that need deeper review for clarity or to understand potential hidden meanings. | |
| # # Steps | |
| # 1. Analyze the input conversation for participant information and context. | |
| # 2. Fill in each section of the Intelligence Summary Document structure. | |
| # 3. Ensure all details, especially those related to potential risk factors or alerts, are captured and highlighted clearly. | |
| # # Output Format | |
| # Provide one structured Intelligence Summary Document for the conversation in either plain text format or structured JSON. | |
| # # JSON Format Example: | |
| # ```json | |
| # { | |
| # "Top-Level Status & Assessment": { | |
| # "Threat Level Assessment": "Unclear - Requires Investigation", | |
| # "Humanitarian Alert": "No distress signals detected." | |
| # }, | |
| # "Basic Metadata": { | |
| # "Number of Speakers": 2, | |
| # "Languages": { | |
| # "Speaker 1": "English", | |
| # "Speaker 2": "English" | |
| # }, | |
| # "Location": "Unknown", | |
| # "Communication Medium": "Direct conversation" | |
| # }, | |
| # "Conversation Overview": { | |
| # "Summary": "A cautious approach was suggested by Speaker 1, followed by an assurance from Speaker 2 that systems are ready.", | |
| # "Alarming Keywords": [], | |
| # "Suspicious or Cryptic Phrases": [] | |
| # }, | |
| # "In-Depth Analysis": { | |
| # "Network Connections": "None identified", | |
| # "Intent & Emotional Tone Detection": "Calm, precautionary tone", | |
| # "Behavioral Patterns": "Speaker 1 expressing concern, Speaker 2 providing assurance", | |
| # "Code Words & Cryptic Language": [], | |
| # "Geolocation References": [], | |
| # "Sentiment on Strategic Issues": "No radical or dissenting sentiment detected" | |
| # }, | |
| # "Resource Mentions & Operational Logistics": { | |
| # "Resource & Asset Mentions": [], | |
| # "Behavioral Deviations": "None noted" | |
| # }, | |
| # "Prioritization, Recommendations & Actionables": { | |
| # "High-Risk Alert Priority": "Low", | |
| # "Recommended Actions": { | |
| # "Surveillance": "No further surveillance needed.", | |
| # "Intervention": "Not required.", | |
| # "Humanitarian Assistance": "Not required.", | |
| # "Follow-Up Analysis": "No unusual phrases detected requiring review." | |
| # } | |
| # } | |
| # }""" |