Seed-Prover 1.5: Mastering Undergraduate-Level Theorem Proving via Learning from Experience
Abstract
Seed-Prover 1.5, a formal theorem-proving model using large-scale agentic reinforcement learning and an efficient test-time scaling workflow, demonstrates superior performance in solving mathematical problems across various levels with reduced computational resources.
Large language models have recently made significant progress to generate rigorous mathematical proofs. In contrast, utilizing LLMs for theorem proving in formal languages (such as Lean) remains challenging and computationally expensive, particularly when addressing problems at the undergraduate level and beyond. In this work, we present Seed-Prover 1.5, a formal theorem-proving model trained via large-scale agentic reinforcement learning, alongside an efficient test-time scaling (TTS) workflow. Through extensive interactions with Lean and other tools, the model continuously accumulates experience during the RL process, substantially enhancing the capability and efficiency of formal theorem proving. Furthermore, leveraging recent advancements in natural language proving, our TTS workflow efficiently bridges the gap between natural and formal languages. Compared to state-of-the-art methods, Seed-Prover 1.5 achieves superior performance with a smaller compute budget. It solves 88\% of PutnamBench (undergraduate-level), 80\% of Fate-H (graduate-level), and 33\% of Fate-X (PhD-level) problems. Notably, using our system, we solved 11 out of 12 problems from Putnam 2025 within 9 hours. Our findings suggest that scaling learning from experience, driven by high-quality formal feedback, holds immense potential for the future of formal mathematical reasoning.
Community
arXiv lens breakdown of this paper 👉 https://arxivlens.com/PaperView/Details/seed-prover-1-5-mastering-undergraduate-level-theorem-proving-via-learning-from-experience-8925-fdfccca3
- Executive Summary
- Detailed Breakdown
- Practical Applications
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper