The current initialization pattern in the LandManager contract and its inherited contracts (although, out of scope for this audit) creates a issue where partial initialization of the contract state is possible. This can lead to an inconsistent contract state, potentially causing unexpected behavior.
The issue stems from the inheritance structure and initialization pattern used in the LandManager contract:
LandManager inherits from BaseBlastManagerUpgradeable: 
BaseBlastManagerUpgradeable in turn inherits from BaseConfigStorageUpgradeable:
But both parent contracts have their own initialize functions with the initializer modifier:
However, the LandManager contract overrides the initialize function:
Now, the issue here is that while the initializer modifier in LandManager prevents multiple calls to its initialize function, it doesnt prevent direct calls to the initialize functions of parent contracts. This could lead to partial initialization if, for example, BaseConfigStorageUpgradeable.initialize is called directly, bypassing the initializer check in LandManager.
We could consider using the __init pattern for internal initializers in parent contracts. For example, we could rename initialize to __BaseConfigStorageUpgradeable_init in BaseConfigStorageUpgradeable and make it internal.
In the LandManagers initialize function, call all necessary internal initializers from parent contracts explicitly. And ensure that the initializer modifier is only used in the most derived contract (LandManager in this case).
