Take a look at https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-zksync/blob/4f0ba34f34a864c354c7e8c47643ed8f4a250e13/code/contracts/ethereum/contracts/governance/Governance.sol#L167-L202
We can see that both functions are marked as payable and then call on the internal _execute(), but the codeflow does not assert that the provided msg.value is equal to the one that is been expended in _execut().
Misappropriation of funds for operations, as if the msg.value is less than call.value, then funds in the contract for different operations would be used for the current one.
Consider requiring that the msg.value provided is the call.value needed.
