This is fairly rampant in code, taking the Admin.sol as the primary case to prove this bug.
Take a look at these instances:
Other instances can be scoped out by using this search keyword: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Acode-423n4%2F2024-03-zksync+require%28+NOT+language%3ATypeScript+NOT+language%3AMarkdown&type=code
Where as some instances have the errored out cases commented out it still does not provide a descriptive case for the require() and as such this causes lack of understanding of protocol.
Consider adding descriptive messages after each require().
