Submitted by [Tera Bot](https://gist.github.com/code423n4/9e80eddfb29953d8b5a424084a54e4ed?permalinkcommentid=4762845#m01-the-owner-is-a-single-point-of-failure-and-a-centralization-risk)
Note: this finding was reported via the winning Automated Findings report. It was declared out of scope for the audit, but is being included here for completeness.
Having a single EOA as the only owner of contracts is a large centralization risk and a single point of failure. A single private key may be taken in a hack, or the sole holder of the key may become unable to retrieve the key when necessary. Consider changing to a multi-signature setup, or having a role-based authorization model.
There are 3 instances of this issue:
GitHub: [118, 177, 216]
chechu (Venus) acknowledged and commented:
0xDjango (Judge) commented:
For this audit, 88 reports were submitted by wardens detailing low risk and non-critical issues. The report highlighted below by Bauchibred received the top score from the judge.
The following wardens also submitted reports: 0xprinc, 0xDetermination, DavidGiladi, josephdara, 0xTheC0der, Testerbot, 0xScourgedev, Maroutis, inzinko, ge6a, merlin, rokinot, 0xMosh, btk, bin2chen, 0xdice91, Fulum, PwnStars, gkrastenov, ThreeSigma, imare, Aymen0909, Flora, DeFiHackLabs, SPYBOY, KrisApostolov, J4X, neumo, jnforja, alexweb3, Mirror, berlin-101, deth, pina, 0xTiwa, d3e4, twicek, ast3ros, tonisives, 0xpiken, MohammedRizwan, ether_sky, pep7siup, Brenzee, Tricko, jkoppel, lsaudit, 0xfusion, glcanvas, lotux, santipu_, xAriextz, y4y, blutorque, ArmedGoose, sashik_eth, Krace, Daniel526, al88nsk, Norah, HChang26, squeaky_cactus, joaovwfreire, Breeje, oakcobalt, hals, rvierdiiev, peanuts, mahdirostami, vagrant, nobody2018, nisedo, IceBear, terrancrypt, Hama, said, n1punp, nadin, e0d1n, kutugu, seerether, 0xWaitress, 0x3b, 0xweb3boy, TangYuanShen, orion, and ptsanev.
