When users try to born synth, the fee and the value of Sparta is calculated at contract Pool while the logic of burning Pools Lp and Synth is located at Synth contract.
Users can send synth to the Synth contract directly and trigger burnSynth at the Pool contract. The Pool would not send any token out while the Synth contract would burn the lp and Synth.
While users can not drain the liquidity by doing this, breaking the AMM rate unexpectedly is may lead to troubles.  The calculation of debt and the fee would end up with a wrong answer.
Pools burnSynth and Synths burnSynth are tightly coupled functions. In fact, according to the current logic, Synth:burnSynth should only be triggered from a valid Pool contract.
IMHO, applying theMoney in - Money Out model in the Synth contract does more harm than good to the readability and security of the protocol. Consider to let Pool contract pass the parameters to the Synth contract and add a require check in the Synth contract.
[L-12] synthVault.sol: _processWithdraw: Replace synthReward with principle
