title: Parthan Kanda Paralokam

abstract: Parthan Kanda Paralokam is a 2008 Indian Malayalam-language comedy action film directed by Anil, starring Jayaram, Mukesh, Kalabhavan Mani and Sridevika in the lead roles. The film also features Jagathy Sreekumar, Kottayam Nazeer and Salim Kumar in supportive roles. Kalabhavan Mani plays the villain role.

text:
# Parthan Kanda Paralokam

***Parthan Kanda Paralokam*** (transl.The heaven that Parthan saw) is a 2008 Indian Malayalam-language comedy action film directed by Anil, starring Jayaram, Mukesh, Kalabhavan Mani and Sridevika in the lead roles. The film also features Jagathy Sreekumar, Kottayam Nazeer and Salim Kumar in supportive roles. Kalabhavan Mani plays the villain role.

## Plot

Parthasarathy, popularly called Parthan, lives in Krishnapuram village. Parthan is constantly clashing with his uncle Falgunan Thampy, who is the Panchayath President. Falgunan is least bothered about the welfare of the people; rather, he is more keen in grabbing the assets of the village temple, which has been locked for many years by the court over a dispute of ownership. Falgunan, also the secretary of temple's ruling committee, believes that the temple belongs to his family, while Parthan and his friends Sulaiman and Poonkodi argue that the temple belongs to the village.

Into this situation comes Falgunan's daughter Sathyabhama, an advocate, who pretends to be in love with Parthan. In fact, her intention is to help her father on the temple dispute in the court. As a result, Parthan, who begins an agitation, is sentenced to one month's imprisonment for contempt of court.

After Parthan is released from jail, the film takes an interesting turn. Parthan nearly dies (and is taken to mortuary, declaring him dead) after consuming spurious liquor in Guruvayoor, but miraculously returns to life. After this near-death experience, Lord Krishna is present to help him in the form of Madhavan, pretending to be his college friend and both start fighting Parthan's uncle. Madhavan helps Parthan to clear all the problems of his life. Sathyabhama realises the innocence of Parthan and her father's wickedness and fell in love with Parthan.

Then enters Veerabhadran alias Musafir to steal the Krishnan idol from Krishnapuram Temple, to disrupt the communal harmony in the village. Parthan fights his plans and with the help of Madhavan, protects the village from disaster. Finally Parthan and Satyabhama are united in marriage.

## Cast

## Soundtrack

| Parthan Kanda Paralokam | |
| --- | --- |
| Soundtrack album by M. Jayachandran | |
| Released | 2008 |
| Recorded | Satyam Audios |
| Genre | World Music |
| Label | Satyam Audios |
| Producer | Screen Cine Entertainments |

*Parthan Kanda Paralokam* has music composed by M. Jayachandran. The lyrics are by renowned poet Kaithapram Damodaran Namboothiri. The film has three songs. The singers are Unni Menon, Jassie Gift, Pradeep, Deepak and Ganga.

| Track # | Song | Singer(s) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | "Vennila" | Unni Menon, Ganga |
| 2 | "Gokula Paala" | Jassie Gift |
| 3 | "Padavalinu" | Pradeep, Deepak |

## Reception

The film could not rise to the expectations and was declared a flop at the box-office. Rediff.com made mostly negative remarks and gave the film a rating of 1.5 stars out of 5. Bharatstudent.com also gave the film a rating of 1.5 out of 5, commenting the film as a disappointment.

## InfoBox

| Parthan Kanda Paralokam | |
| --- | --- |
| Theatrical poster | |
| Directed by | Anil |
| Written by | * K. B. Raju
(Story) * Rajan Kiriyath
(Screenplay) |
| Produced by | K. B. Madhu |
| Starring |  |
| Cinematography | Anandakuttan |
| Edited by | P. C. Mohanan |
| Music by | M. Jayachandran |
| Release date | * 3 October 2008 (2008-10-03) |
| Running time | 139 minutes |
| Country | India |
| Language | Malayalam |


title: Paris–Marseille railway

abstract: The railway from Paris to Marseille is an 862-kilometre long railway line, that connects Paris to the southern port city of Marseille, France, via Dijon and Lyon. The railway was opened in several stages between 1847 and 1856, when the final section through Lyon was opened. The opening of the LGV Sud-Est high speed line from Paris to Lyon in 1981, the LGV Rhône-Alpes in 1992 and the LGV Méditerranée in 2001 has decreased its importance for passenger traffic.

text:
# Paris–Marseille railway

The **railway from Paris to Marseille** is an 862-kilometre long railway line, that connects Paris to the southern port city of Marseille, France, via Dijon and Lyon. The railway was opened in several stages between 1847 and 1856, when the final section through Lyon was opened. The opening of the LGV Sud-Est high speed line from Paris to Lyon in 1981, the LGV Rhône-Alpes in 1992 and the LGV Méditerranée in 2001 has decreased its importance for passenger traffic.

## Route

The Paris–Marseille railway leaves the Gare de Lyon in Paris in southeastern direction. It crosses the river Marne at Charenton-le-Pont, and follows the right Seine bank upstream until Crosne, where it follows a course east of the Forest of Sénart. It crosses the Seine near Melun and follows the left Seine bank upstream, along the Forest of Fontainebleau. Beyond Montereau-Fault-Yonne, the railway follows the left Yonne bank upstream. At Migennes the Yonne is crossed, and the small rivers Armançon, Brenne and Oze are followed upstream. Beyond Blaisy-Bas the railway enters the watershed of the Mediterranean Sea, descending the Ouche river valley to central Dijon.

At Dijon the railway turns south, running along the east side of the Côte d'Or escarpment with its famous vineyards. At Chalon-sur-Saône the railway reaches the river Saône, and follows its right bank downstream until the city centre of Lyon. Before and after the Lyon-Perrache station it crosses the Saône and the Rhône respectively, and continues downstream along the left Rhône bank. Between Collonges-au-Mont-d'Or (north of Lyon) and La Guillotière (a southern quarter of Lyon) there is a parallel line to its east, on which the other main station of Lyon, Part-Dieu, is situated. There is also a long parallel line on the right bank of the Rhône between Lyon and Nîmes, which is mainly used for freight transport.

The railway passes through Valence, Avignon and Arles, where it leaves the Rhône and turns east. It passes along the northern shore of the Étang de Berre. After a total length of 862 km, it reaches its terminus Marseille-Saint-Charles station.

### Main stations

The main stations on the Paris–Marseille railway are:

## History

The sections Paris–Lyon, Lyon–Avignon and Avignon–Marseille were built and exploited by three different companies, that became part of Chemins de fer de Paris à Lyon et à la Méditerranée in 1857. The concessions Lyon–Avignon and Avignon–Marseille had already been united in 1852 of the Chemin de fer de Lyon à la Méditerranée. The first section that was opened in 1847 led from Rognonas near Avignon to Pas-des-Lanciers near Marseille. Marseille was connected in 1848. In 1849 a line from Paris to Tonnerre (Yonne) and a line from Dijon to Chalon-sur-Saône were built, and Avignon was connected with Rognonas. Tonnerre and Dijon were connected in 1851. In 1854 the line from Marseille to Avignon was extended to Valence, and the line from Paris to Chalon was extended to Lyon-Vaise. In 1855 Valence was connected with La Guillotière, a southern quarter of Lyon. Finally in 1856 the passage through Lyon from La Guillotière to Vaise was opened. Together with existing railways north of Paris, this enabled for the first time railway travel between the North Sea or the English Channel and the Mediterranean Sea.

It is also known as the "Imperial Line" as it was used by Napoleon III, who saw it as a way to connect all regions over which he reigned. France at the time had a 50-year delay on industrialisation when compared to England; the railway would help speed along this progress. Coal was carried to all regions of the country, Beaujolais nouveau could be sampled far beyond its native area, with wines from the Midi, the Côtes-du-Rhône and even the Bourgognes using the line. The PLM became a sort of "wine highway", with up to 10% of the company's freight profits in 1909 coming from the wine trade.

## Services

The Paris–Marseille railway is used by the following passenger services:

## InfoBox

| Paris–Marseille railway | |
| --- | --- |
| The railway viaduct crossing the Loing at Saint-Mammès | |
| Overview | |
| Status | Operational |
| Owner | SNCF |
| Locale | France (Île-de-France,
Bourgogne-Franche-Comté,
Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes,
Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur) |
| Termini |  |
| Service | |
| System | SNCF |
| Operator(s) | SNCF |
| History | |
| Opened | 1847–1856 |
| Technical | |
| Line length | 862 km (536 mi) |
| Number of tracks | Double track |
| Track gauge | 1,435 mm (4 ft 8+12 in) standard gauge |
| Electrification | 1.5 kV DC |
| Route map | |


title: Particle velocity probe

abstract: A particle velocity probe is a probe capable of measuring the acoustic particle velocity. Currently there are two commercially available particle velocity probes. The first one is produced by Microflown Technologies. The particle velocity transducer is called the Microflown. The second particle velocity transducer is manufactured by Weles Acoustics. Both commercially available solutions share a similar transduction principle. The Microflown sensor is a MEMS based transducer able to directly measure acoustic particle velocity. Very small sized elements are created on silicon wafers under a clean room technology. The sensing element consists of two ultra-thin wires. These wires are platinum resistors that act as temperature sensors. They are powered by an electric current which causes them to heat up. Local temperature variations cause changes in the wires resistance. When the acoustic particle velocity (sound) propagates across the wires, it asymmetrically alters the temperature distribution around the resistors (wires). The resulting resistance difference provides a broad band linear signal with a figure-of-eight directivity that is proportional to the acoustic particle velocity.

text:
# Particle velocity probe

A **particle velocity probe** is a probe capable of measuring the acoustic particle velocity.

Currently there are two commercially available particle velocity probes. The first one is produced by Microflown Technologies. The particle velocity transducer is called the Microflown. The second particle velocity transducer is manufactured by Weles Acoustics. Both commercially available solutions share a similar transduction principle.

The Microflown sensor is a MEMS based transducer able to directly measure acoustic particle velocity. Very small sized elements are created on silicon wafers under a clean room technology. The sensing element consists of two ultra-thin wires (thinner than a strand of human hair). These wires are platinum resistors that act as temperature sensors. They are powered by an electric current which causes them to heat up. Local temperature variations cause changes in the wires resistance. When the acoustic particle velocity (sound) propagates across the wires, it asymmetrically alters the temperature distribution around the resistors (wires). The resulting resistance difference provides a broad band (20 Hz up to at least 10 kHz) linear signal with a figure-of-eight directivity that is proportional to the acoustic particle velocity.

## Literature

Multiple application cases, theory and fundamentals of particle velocity sensing:

List of academic publications related to particle velocity sensors:

To model a tri-axial particle velocity probe's measurement of a source incident from the near field, see:

The tri-axial particle velocity probe's azimuth-elevation beam pattern:

A tri-axial particle velocity probe may be used to enhance speech reception in a video conferencing scenario:


title: Parkend

abstract: Parkend is a village, located at the foot of the Cannop Valley, in the Royal Forest of Dean, West Gloucestershire, England, and has a history dating back to the early 17th century. During the 19th century it was a busy industrial village with several coal mines, an ironworks, stoneworks, timber-yard and a tinplate works, but by the early 20th century most had succumbed to a loss of markets and the general industrial decline. In more recent times, the village has become a tourist destination.

text:
# Parkend

**Parkend** is a village, located at the foot of the Cannop Valley, in the Royal Forest of Dean, West Gloucestershire, England, and has a history dating back to the early 17th century. During the 19th century it was a busy industrial village with several coal mines, an ironworks, stoneworks, timber-yard and a tinplate works, but by the early 20th century most had succumbed to a loss of markets and the general industrial decline. In more recent times, the village has become a tourist destination.

## Amenities

The village has two public houses, both with guest accommodation, and one with an adjoining hostel; The Fountain Inn and Lodge and The Woodman Inn. There are also two guesthouses, several holiday let properties, a CIU affiliated club with caravan & camping facilities, and a large camping and caravan site named Whitemead Forest Park; owned and operated by the Civil Service Motoring Association (C.S.M.A.). The Dean Field Studies Centre, once part of Parkend Ironworks, is owned by Bristol City Council and is used to accommodate schoolchildren from that city.

The village and parish church are dedicated to St Paul and situated on the eastern edge of the village in a forest clearing. The shape provides the point of interest, being both octagonal and cruciform, with the arms formed by the sanctuary, north and west transepts and the west tower. It was designed and built in 1822, together with the village school, by Henry Poole; a local priest who raised most of the money through public subscription and his own generosity.

## Sport and Recreation

Parkend Cricket Club is an English amateur cricket club that is based on the northern edge of the village on Crown Lane. Parkend have 2 Saturday senior XI teams. The 1st XI compete in the Gloucestershire County Cricket League, and the 2nd XI are in the Cheltenham, Gloucester and Forest of Dean League. They also have a Midweek senior XI team that traditionally took part in the annual West Gloucestershire Cricket Federation "Verderers Cup" competition, and a Sunday XI team that currently play the occasional friendly against neighbouring clubs. The Parkend juniors all play competitive cricket in the Leadon Vale Youth Cricket League.

The Parkend Players is an Amateur theatre group that performs most of its shows at the village Memorial Hall.

Parkend Carnival, held on August Bank Holiday Monday, is renowned throughout the forest as being the biggest and best for miles around.

During the summer, regular Sunday car boot sales are held on the recreation field, the profits from which go to support the Memorial Hall.

The village also has a very active Women's Institute.

### RSPB Nagshead

Located on the western edge of the village, RSPB Nagshead is a quiet reserve, open all year. Facilities include a visitor centre, large car park, two viewing hides, two way-marked walks, and a picnic area. Birdlife regularly seen in the reserve includes great spotted woodpecker, Eurasian nuthatch, northern goshawk and common buzzard. Breeding birds include common redstart, pied flycatcher, and common crossbill and wood warbler, whilst Redwing, hawfinch and Eurasian woodcock can be found in winter.

In 1942, nest boxes were erected, in the hope that pied flycatchers would control oak leafroller moths, which were defoliating trees. These boxes have been continually monitored since 1948, making it the world's longest running bird breeding programme.

### Parkend railway station

The railway in Parkend began life in 1810, as a horse-drawn tramroad, owned and operated by the Severn and Wye Railway Co. By 1874, the line had been converted to run standard gauge steam locomotives and the station was built in 1875 to enable the company to also run passenger services alongside its freight operations. The level crossing gates by the station are reputedly the longest in Britain.

A decline in coal production and a reduction in passengers saw the station close to regular passenger services in 1929. The last goods train left Parkend on 26 March 1976 and much of the track was dismantled. The line was bought by the Dean Forest Railway, based at Norchard, and Parkend was officially re-opened on Friday 19 May 2006 by the Princess Royal. The station is currently the northern terminus of the Dean Forest Railway.

## History

### Early history

The earliest evidence of human activity in Parkend comes from a hoard of over 1,000 Roman coins, found in the village in 1852, and dating from around AD 300. A lack of other artefacts from the period suggests that the Romans probably did not settle there. History is then silent until 1278, and the first record of a hunting enclosure called ‘Wistemede’ - later known as Whitemead Park. The village's location, at one end of this park, is how Parkend derived its name.

In 1612 James I built a charcoal-fired blast furnace and forge at ‘Parke End’, bringing with it the first real settlement, however, ‘The King’s Ironworks’ proved horrendously inefficient and it closed in 1674. It would seem that occupation of the village then ceased until new dwellings appeared from 1747 onwards. Part of the Fountain Inn dates back to 1767 and is the oldest surviving building in Parkend. The first record of a coal mine in Parkend dates back to 1718, although the remains of several bell pits, possibly dating back to the 1600s, are visible in the woods south-west of St Paul's church.

### Industrialisation and growth of the village

With the advent of coke-fired furnaces, Parkend, and its many coal mines, was once again considered an ideal location for the production of iron. In 1799 a new ironworks was constructed near the site of the current post office. Initially it suffered from technical problems, but by the early/mid-1800s it had triggered a major industrialisation of the village.

The need for improved transport links was instrumental in the construction of a horse-drawn tramroad by the Severn & Wye Railway Co in 1810, connecting the village with the docks at Lydney. Demand for coal at the ironworks also lead to the appearance of several large coal mines in the village during the early 1800s, the most notable being 'Castlemain'.

In 1818/9 another ironworks was also built at Darkhill, just to the west of Parkend, and in 1845 Robert Forester Mushet took over management of the site. One of his greatest achievements was to perfect the Bessemer Process by discovering the solution to early quality problems which beset the process. In a second key advance in metallurgy Mushet invented 'R Mushet's Special Steel' (R.M.S.) in 1868. It was both the first true tool steel and the first air-hardening steel. It revolutionised the design of machine tools and the progress of industrial metalworking, and was the forerunner of High speed steel. The remains of Darkhill are now preserved as an Industrial Archaeological Site of International Importance and are open to the public.

In 1825, the lower pond at Cannop and a 1½ mile leat were constructed to provide a constant supply of water to a waterwheel at Parkend Ironworks. Despite the enormous effort expended in creating this supply, it proved inadequate and an engine house and steam engine were added in 1828. A second pond at Cannop was also constructed a year later.

The school and St Paul’s church were built in 1822 and Henry Poole, who had designed both, became Parkend’s first vicar. He moved into the new vicarage in 1829, but the school developed structural problems and was rebuilt, on the same site, in 1845.

A stone works opened in 1850 and a tinplate works was constructed in 1853. It stood to the left of the ironworks, and further along was built a row of terraced houses, known as ‘The Square’, which were used to accommodate the workers there.

In 1864 the Severn and Wye Railway Company began operating steam locomotives on the existing tramway. This proved to be unsatisfactory and 1868 the company also added a broad-gauge steam railway line, but both were removed and replaced with standard gauge tracks by 1874. At around the same time, a loading wharf, known as Marsh Sidings, was constructed and Parkend railway station opened in 1875, allowing the company to also operate passenger trains alongside its freight operations.

In 1871 a third furnace was added at Parkend Ironworks, but the optimism behind this investment was to be short-lived.

### Periods of industrial decline

During the mid-1870s, industry in the Forest, and across the country as a whole, quickly began to slide into a deep recession. Parkend Tinplate Works, and the ironworks that had dominated the village for 90 years, succumbed to a loss of markets and both closed in 1877. Just a few years before, these two businesses alone had been employing 500 people between them, but even this was overshadowed by the closure of the Parkend coal pits in 1880, which went into voluntary liquidation with the loss of 700 jobs.

By the mid-1880s, the industrial decline that had gripped the Forest was beginning to ease. The mines, which had closed in 1880, reopened in 1885 and by the 1890s they were prospering once again. The ironworks did not re-open and were demolished by 1909, although the imposing engine-house survived to become the country’s first Forester Training School in 1910.

The 1920s proved to be another difficult period for the residents of Parkend. The high demand for coal, that had been created by the First World War, was followed by a slump and industrial unrest. Matters were made worse as the local mines were now finding it difficult to access coal easily, and some had been worked out completely. There were major strikes in 1921 and 1926, and all the village mines, except New Fancy, finally closed for the last time in 1929. There was a considerable knock-on effect for other industries too and the railway closed to passengers in the same year. Parkend stone works closed in 1932, marking the end of heavy industry in the village.

### Modern history

The Forester Training School was commandeered by the War Office during WWII and used as a barracks by the American army. After the war it reverted to being a forestry school until it was bought by Avon County Council in 1972, for use as a field-studies centre, and regularly hosts groups of school children.

The houses known as ‘The Square’ were demolished in the mid-1950s and their occupants re-housed in a new council estate. Another housing development, of 26 dwellings, was built near the railway station, in 2004.

Whitemead Park, which had been the Forestry Commission’s headquarters since 1814, was bought by the Civil Service Motoring Association in 1970. It opened as a caravan site in 1971 and is now the largest tourist accommodation facility in the forest.

Freight operations by the railway continued at Marsh Sidings up until 1976, after which much of the track was dismantled. The line was bought by the Dean Forest Railway Preservation Society and Parkend station was officially re-opened by princess Anne on 19 May 2006.

## Notable residents

* Warren James (1792–1841) - Miners' leader who led the Foresters to action against the Crown, in 1831. Born on the southern edge of Parkend.
* Jolly John Nash (1828–1901) - Colliery proprietor who became a leading music hall entertainer in London.
* Robert Deakin (1917-1985) - Anglican Bishop of Tewkesbury. Born in the village.
* Mary Rose Young (born 1958) - Internationally renowned ceramic artist, lives and works in the village.

## InfoBox

| Parkend | |
| --- | --- |
| Parkend (2009) | |
| ParkendLocation within Gloucestershire | |
| OS grid reference | SO615082 |
| London | 105.86 mi (170.37 km) |
| Civil parish | * West Dean |
| District |  |
| Shire county |  |
| Region |  |
| Country | England |
| Sovereign state | United Kingdom |
| Post town | LYDNEY |
| Postcode district | GL15 |
| Dialling code | 01594 |
|  | |
| Police | Gloucestershire |
| Fire | Gloucestershire |
| Ambulance | South Western |
|  | |
| UK Parliament |  |
| Website | West Dean Parish Council |
|


title: Park Mal-sim

abstract: Park Mal-sim is a South Korean former professional tennis player. Park appeared in seven ties for South Korea in the Federation Cup, four in 1988 and three in 1990. All of her matches were in singles and she won four rubbers, which included a win over Japan's top player Etsuko Inoue. On the professional tour, Park reached a best singles ranking of 386 and won four ITF titles. At the 1990 Asian Games in Beijing she won a singles bronze medal for South Korea and was also a member of the bronze medal winners in the team event.

text:
# Park Mal-sim

**Park Mal-sim** (born 15 July 1965) is a South Korean former professional tennis player.

Park appeared in seven ties for South Korea in the Federation Cup, four in 1988 and three in 1990. All of her matches were in singles and she won four rubbers, which included a win over Japan's top player Etsuko Inoue.

On the professional tour, Park reached a best singles ranking of 386 and won four ITF titles.

At the 1990 Asian Games in Beijing she won a singles bronze medal for South Korea and was also a member of the bronze medal winners in the team event.

## ITF finals

### Singles (4–2)

| Outcome | No. | Date | Tournament | Surface | Opponent | Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Winner | 1. | 19 June 1988 | Birmingham, United States | Clay | Anna Ivan | 6–3, 0–6, 6–2 |
| Runner-up | 1. | 18 June 1989 | Incheon, South Korea | Clay | Lee Jeong-soon | 2–6, 4–6 |
| Runner-up | 2. | 25 June 1989 | Gwangju, South Korea | Clay | Lee Jeong-soon | 4–6, 3–6 |
| Winner | 2. | 17 June 1990 | Incheon, South Korea | Clay | Choi Jeom-sang | 6–2, 6–0 |
| Winner | 3. | 9 June 1991 | Gwangju, South Korea | Clay | Kim Yeon-sook | 7–5, 6–3 |
| Winner | 4. | 16 June 1991 | Incheon, South Korea | Clay | Lee Jeong-myung | 6–4, 6–1 |

### Doubles (2–1)

| Outcome | No. | Date | Tournament | Surface | Partner | Opponents | Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Winner | 1. | 18 June 1989 | Incheon, South Korea | Clay | Lee Jeong-soon | Park Yang-ja
Han Eun-ju | 6–3, 6–1 |
| Runner-up | 1. | 25 June 1989 | Gwangju, South Korea | Clay | Lee Jeong-soon | Park Yang-ja
Han Eun-ju | 4–6, 1–6 |
| Winner | 2. | 17 June 1990 | Incheon, South Korea | Clay | Sohn Mi-ae | Choi Eul-seon
Han Eun-ju | 6–1, 6–2 |

## InfoBox

Park Mal-sim
| Country (sports) | South Korea |
| --- | --- |
| Born | (1965-07-15) 15 July 1965 |
| Retired | 1993 |
| Prize money | $11,916 |
| Singles | |
| Career record | 45-24 |
| Career titles | 4 ITF |
| Highest ranking | No. 386 (28 October 1991) |
| Doubles | |
| Career record | 8-7 |
| Career titles | 2 ITF |
| Highest ranking | No. 604 (21 June 1993) |
| Medal record      Asian Games  1990 Beijing Women's Singles  1990 Beijing Women's Team | |


title: Mordellistena angustiformis

abstract: Mordellistena angustiformis is a species of beetle in the family Mordellidae. It was described in 1937 by Eugene Ray from Puerto Rico. This beetle measures 1.85 mm (0.073 in) in length, or 2.45 mm (0.096 in) when including the anal stylus. The antennae are 0.5 mm (0.020 in) long.

text:
# Mordellistena angustiformis

***Mordellistena angustiformis*** is a species of beetle in the family Mordellidae. It was described in 1937 by Eugene Ray from Puerto Rico.

This beetle measures 1.85 mm (0.073 in) in length, or 2.45 mm (0.096 in) when including the anal stylus. The antennae are 0.5 mm (0.020 in) long.

## InfoBox

| *Mordellistena angustiformis* | |
| --- | --- |
|
| Scientific classification | |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Arthropoda |
| Class: | Insecta |
| Order: | Coleoptera |
| Family: | Mordellidae |
| Genus: | *Mordellistena* |
| Species: | ***M. angustiformis*** |
| Binomial name | |
| ***Mordellistena angustiformis***<br>Ray, 1937 | |
|


title: Tuber

abstract: Tubers are a type of enlarged structure that plants use as storage organs for nutrients, derived from stems or roots. Tubers help plants perennate, provide energy and nutrients, and are a means of asexual reproduction. Stem tubers manifest as thickened rhizomes or stolons; examples include the potato and yam. The term root tuber describes modified lateral roots, as in sweet potatoes, cassava, and dahlias.

text:
# Tuber

**Tubers** are a type of enlarged structure that plants use as storage organs for nutrients, derived from stems or roots. Tubers help plants perennate (survive winter or dry months), provide energy and nutrients, and are a means of asexual reproduction.

**Stem tubers** manifest as thickened rhizomes (underground stems) or stolons (horizontal connections between organisms); examples include the potato and yam. The term ***root tuber*** describes modified lateral roots, as in sweet potatoes, cassava, and dahlias.

## Terminology

The term originates from the Latin *tuber*, meaning 'lump, bump, or swelling'.

Some writers limit the definition of *tuber* to structures derived from stems, while others also apply the term to structures derived from roots.

## Stem tubers

A stem tuber forms from thickened rhizomes or stolons. The top sides of the tuber produce shoots that grow into typical stems and leaves and the undersides produce roots. They tend to form at the sides of the parent plant and are most often located near the soil surface. The underground tuber is normally a short-lived storage and regenerative organ developing from a shoot that branches off a mature plant. The offspring or new tubers are attached to a parent tuber or form at the end of a hypogeogenous (initiated below ground) rhizome. In the autumn the plant dies, except for the new offspring tubers, which have one dominant bud that in spring regrows a new shoot producing stems and leaves; in summer the tubers decay and new tubers begin to grow. Some plants also form smaller tubers or tubercules that act like seeds, producing small plants that resemble (in morphology and size) seedlings. Some stem tubers are long-lived, such as those of tuberous begonias, but many plants have tubers that survive only until the plants have fully leafed out, at which point the tuber is reduced to a shriveled-up husk.

Stem tubers generally start off as enlargements of the hypocotyl section of a seedling, but sometimes also include the first node or two of the epicotyl and the upper section of the root. The tuber has a vertical orientation, with one or a few vegetative buds on the top and fibrous roots produced on the bottom from a basal section. Typically the tuber has an oblong rounded shape.

Tuberous begonias, yams, and cyclamens are commonly grown stem tubers. Mignonette vine (*Anredera cordifolia*) produces aerial stem tubers on 3.5-to-7.5-metre-tall (12 to 25 ft) vines; the tubers fall to the ground and grow. *Plectranthus esculentus*, of the mint family Lamiaceae, produces tuberous underground organs from the base of the stem, weighing up to 1.8 kg (3 lb 15 oz) per tuber, forming from axillary buds producing short stolons that grow into tubers. Even though legumes are not commonly associated with forming stem tubers, *Lathyrus tuberosus* is an example native to Asia and Europe, where it was once grown as a crop.

### Potatoes

Potatoes are stem tubers  enlarged stolons thicken to develop into storage organs. The tuber has all the parts of a normal stem, including nodes and internodes. The nodes are the eyes and each has a leaf scar. The nodes or eyes are arranged around the tuber in a spiral fashion beginning on the end opposite the attachment point to the stolon. The terminal bud is produced at the farthest point away from the stolon attachment and tubers, and thus show the same apical dominance as a normal stem. Internally, a tuber is filled with starch stored in enlarged parenchyma-like cells. The inside of a tuber has the typical cell structures of any stem, including a pith, vascular zones, and a cortex.

The tuber is produced in one growing season and used to perennate the plant and as a means of propagation. When fall comes, the above-ground structure of the plant dies, but the tubers survive underground over winter until spring, when they regenerate new shoots that use the stored food in the tuber to grow. As the main shoot develops from the tuber, the base of the shoot close to the tuber produces adventitious roots and lateral buds on the shoot. The shoot also produces stolons that are long etiolated stems. The stolon elongates during long days with the presence of high auxins levels that prevent root growth off of the stolon. Before new tuber formation begins, the stolon must be a certain age. The enzyme lipoxygenase makes a hormone, jasmonic acid, which is involved in the control of potato tuber development.

The stolons are easily recognized when potato plants are grown from seeds. As the plants grow, stolons are produced around the soil surface from the nodes. The tubers form close to the soil surface and sometimes even on top of the ground. When potatoes are cultivated, the tubers are cut into pieces and planted much deeper into the soil. Planting the pieces deeper creates more area for the plants to generate the tubers and their size increases. The pieces sprout shoots that grow to the surface. These shoots are rhizome-like and generate short stolons from the nodes while in the ground. When the shoots reach the soil surface, they produce roots and shoots that grow into the green plant.

## Root tubers

A root tuber, tuberous root or storage root is a modified lateral root, enlarged to function as a storage organ. The enlarged area of the tuber can be produced at the end or middle of a root or involve the entire root. It is thus different in origin, but similar in function and appearance, to a stem tuber. Plants with tuberous roots include the sweet potato (*Ipomoea batatas*), cassava, dahlia, and *Sagittaria* (arrowhead) species.

Root tubers are perennating organs, thickened roots that store nutrients over periods when the plant cannot actively grow, thus permitting survival from one year to the next. The massive enlargement of secondary roots typically represented by sweet potato have the internal and external cell and tissue structures of a normal root; they produce adventitious roots and stems, which again produce adventitious roots.

In root tubers, there are no nodes and internodes or reduced leaves. The proximal end of the tuber, which was attached to the old plant, has crown tissue that produces buds which grow into new stems and foliage. The distal end of the tuber normally produces unmodified roots. In stem tubers the order is reversed, with the distal end producing stems. Tuberous roots are biennial in duration: the plant produces tubers the first year, and at the end of the growing season, the shoots often die, leaving the newly generated tubers; the next growing season, the tubers produce new shoots. As the shoots of the new plant grow, the stored reserves of the tuber are consumed in the production of new roots, stems, and reproductive organs; any remaining root tissue dies concurrently to the plant's regeneration of the next generation of tubers.

*Hemerocallis fulva* (orange daylily) and a number of daylily hybrids have large root tubers; *H. fulva* spreads by underground stolons that end with a new fan that grows roots that produce thick tubers and then send out more stolons.

Plants with root tubers can be propagated from late summer to late winter by digging up the tubers and separating them, making sure that each piece has some crown tissue for replanting.

Root tubers are a rich source of nutrients for humans and wild animals, e.g. those of *Sagittaria* plants which are eaten by ducks.

* Bulb, modified stems with a short fleshy vertical stem, covered by thick fleshy modified leaves that enclose a bud for the next season's growth
* Caudex, a form of stem modification similar in appearance to a tuber
* Corm, modified stems covered by dry scale-like leaves called a tunic, differing from true bulbs by having distinct nodes and internodes
* Taproot, the largest, most central, and most dominant root of some plants


title: Reversed-phase chromatography

abstract: Reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RP-LC) is a mode of liquid chromatography in which non-polar stationary phase and polar mobile phases are used for the separation of organic compounds. The vast majority of separations and analyses using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in recent years are done using the reversed phase mode. In the reversed phase mode, the sample components are retained in the system the more hydrophobic they are. The factors affecting the retention and separation of solutes in the reversed phase chromatographic system are as follows: a. The chemical nature of the stationary phase, i.e., the ligands bonded on its surface, as well as their bonding density, namely the extent of their coverage. b. The composition of the mobile phase. Type of the bulk solvents whose mixtures affect the polarity of the mobile phase, hence the name modifier for a solvent added to affect the polarity of the mobile phase. C. Additives, such as buffers, affect the pH of the mobile phase, which affect the ionization state of the solutes and their polarity. In order to retain the organic components in mixtures, the stationary phases, packed within columns, consist of a hydrophobic substrates, bonded to the surface of porous silica-gel particles in various geometries, at different diameters, with varying pore diameters.   The particle's surface is covered by chemically bonded hydrocarbons, such as C3, C4, C8, C18 and more. The longer the hydrocarbon associated with the stationary phase, the longer the sample components will be retained. Some stationary phases are also made of hydrophobic polymeric particles, or hybridized silica-organic groups particles, for method in which mobile phases at extreme pH are used. Most current methods of separation of biomedical materials use C-18 columns, sometimes called by trade names, such as ODS (octadecylsilane) or RP-18.  The mobile phases are mixtures of water and polar organic solvents, the vast majority of which are methanol and acetonitrile.  These mixtures usually contain various additives such as buffers, surfactants and special additives (EDTA). The goal of using supplements of one kind or another is to increase efficiency, selectivity, and control solute retention.

text:
# Reversed-phase chromatography

**Reversed-phase liquid chromatography** (**RP-LC**) is a mode of liquid chromatography in which non-polar stationary phase and polar mobile phases are used for the separation of organic compounds. The vast majority of separations and analyses using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in recent years are done using the reversed phase mode. In the reversed phase mode, the sample components are retained in the system the more hydrophobic they are.

The factors affecting the retention and separation of solutes in the reversed phase chromatographic system are as follows:

a. *The chemical nature of the stationary phase*, i.e., the ligands bonded on its surface, as well as their bonding density, namely the extent of their coverage.

b. *The composition of the mobile phase*. Type of the bulk solvents whose mixtures affect the polarity of the mobile phase, hence the name modifier for a solvent added to affect the polarity of the mobile phase.

C. Additives, such as buffers, affect *the pH of the mobile phase*, which affect the ionization state of the solutes and their polarity.

In order to retain the organic components in mixtures, the stationary phases, packed within columns, consist of a hydrophobic substrates, bonded to the surface of porous silica-gel particles in various geometries (spheric, irregular), at different diameters (sub-2, 3, 5, 7, 10 um), with varying pore diameters (60, 100, 150, 300, A). The particle's surface is covered by chemically bonded hydrocarbons, such as C3, C4, C8, C18 and more. The longer the hydrocarbon associated with the stationary phase, the longer the sample components will be retained. Some stationary phases are also made of hydrophobic polymeric particles, or hybridized silica-organic groups particles, for method in which mobile phases at extreme pH are used. Most current methods of separation of biomedical materials use C-18 columns, sometimes called by trade names, such as ODS (octadecylsilane) or RP-18.

The mobile phases are mixtures of water and polar organic solvents, the vast majority of which are methanol and acetonitrile. These mixtures usually contain various additives such as buffers (acetate, phosphate, citrate), surfactants (alkyl amines or alkyl sulfonates) and special additives (EDTA). The goal of using supplements of one kind or another is to increase efficiency, selectivity, and control solute retention.

## Stationary phases

The history and evolution of reversed phase stationary phases in described in detail in an article by Majors, Dolan, Carr and Snyder.

In the 1970s, most liquid chromatography runs were performed using solid particles as the stationary phases, made of unmodified silica gel or alumina. This type of technique is now referred to as normal-phase chromatography. Since the stationary phase is hydrophilic in this technique, and the mobile phase is non-polar (consisting of organic solvents such as hexane and heptane), biomolecules with hydrophilic properties in the sample adsorb to the stationary phase strongly. Moreover, they were not dissolved easily in the mobile phase solvents. At the same time hydrophobic molecules experience less affinity to the polar stationary phase, and elute through it early with not enough retention. This was the reasons why during the 1970s the silica based particles were treated with hydrocarbons, immobilized or bonded on their surface, and the mobile phases were switched to aqueous and polar in nature, to accommodate biomedical substances.

The use of a hydrophobic stationary phase and polar mobile phases is essentially the reverse of normal phase chromatography, since the polarity of the mobile and stationary phases have been inverted – hence the term reversed-phase chromatography. As a result, hydrophobic molecules in the polar mobile phase tend to adsorb to the hydrophobic stationary phase, and hydro*philic* molecules in the sample pass through the column and are eluted first. Hydrophobic molecules can be eluted from the column by decreasing the polarity of the mobile phase using an organic (non-polar) solvent, which reduces hydrophobic interactions. The more hydrophobic the molecule, the more strongly it will bind to the stationary phase, and the higher the concentration of organic solvent that will be required to elute the molecule.

Many of the mathematical parameters of the theory of chromatography and experimental considerations used in other chromatographic methods apply to RP-LC as well (for example, the selectivity factor, chromatographic resolution, plate count, etc. It can be used for the separation of a wide variety of molecules. It is typically used for separation of proteins, because the organic solvents used in normal-phase chromatography can denature many proteins.

Today, RP-LC is a frequently used analytical technique. There are huge variety of stationary phases available for use in RP-LC, allowing great flexibility in the development of the separation methods.

### Silica-based stationary phases

Silica gel particles are commonly used as a stationary phase in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for several reasons, including:

1. **High surface area**: Silica gel particles have a high surface area, allowing direct interactions with solutes or after bonding of variety of ligands for versatile interactions with the sample molecules, leading to better separations.
2. **Chemical and thermal stability and inertness**: Silica gel is chemically stable, as it usually does not react with either the solvents of the mobile phase nor the compounds being separated, resulting in accurate, repeatable and reliable analyses.
3. **Wide applicability**: Silica gel is versatile and can be modified with various functional groups, making it suitable for a wide range of analytes and applications.
4. **Efficient separation**: The unique properties of silica gel particles, combined with their high surface area and controlled average particle diameter pore size, facilitate efficient and precise separation of compounds in HPLC.
5. **Reproducibility**: Silica gel particles can offer high batch-to-batch reproducibility, which is crucial for consistent and reliable HPLC analyses throughout decades.
6. **Particle diameter and pore size control**: Silica gel can be engineered to have specific pore sizes, enabling precise control over separation based on molecular size.
7. **Cost-effectiveness**: Silica is the most abundant element on earth, hence its gel is a cost-effective choice for HPLC applications, making it widely adopted in laboratories.

The United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) has classified HPLC columns by L# types. The most popular column in this classification is an octadecyl carbon chain (C18)-bonded silica (USP classification L1). This is followed by C8-bonded silica (L7), pure silica (L3), cyano-bonded silica (CN) (L10) and phenyl-bonded silica (L11). Note that C18, C8 and phenyl are dedicated reversed-phase stationary phases, while CN columns can be used in a reversed-phase mode depending on analyte and mobile phase conditions. Not all C18 columns have identical retention properties. Surface functionalization of silica can be performed in a monomeric or a polymeric reaction with different short-chain organosilanes used in a second step to cover remaining silanol groups (end-capping). While the overall retention mechanism remains the same, subtle differences in the surface chemistries of different stationary phases will lead to changes in selectivity.

Modern columns have different polarity depending on the ligand bonded to the stationary phase. PFP is pentafluorphenyl. CN is cyano. NH2 is amino. ODS is octadecyl or C18. ODCN is a mixed mode column consisting of C18 and nitrile.

Recent developments in chromatographic supports and instrumentation for liquid chromatography (LC) facilitate rapid and highly efficient separations, using various stationary phases geometries. Various analytical strategies have been proposed, such as the use of silica-based monolithic supports, elevated mobile phase temperatures, and columns packed with sub-3 μm superficially porous particles (fused or solid core) or with sub-2 μm fully porous particles for use in ultra-high-pressure LC systems (UHPLC).

## Mobile phases

A comprehensive article on the modern trends and best practices of mobile phase selection in reversed-phase chromatography was published by Boyes and Dong. A mobile phase in reversed-phase chromatograpy consists of mixtures of water or aqueous buffers, to which organic solvents are added, to elute analytes from a reversed-phase column in a selective manner. The added organic solvents must be miscible with water, and the two most common organic solvents used are acetonitrile and methanol. Other solvents can also be used such as ethanol or 2-propanol (isopropyl alcohol) and tetrahydrofuran (THF). The organic solvent is called also a modifier, since it is added to the aqueous solution in the mobile phase in order to modify the polarity of the mobile phase. Water is the most polar solvent in the reversed phase mobile phase; therefore, lowering the polarity of the mobile phase by adding modifiers enhances its elution strength. The two most widely used organic modifiers are acetonitrile and methanol, although acetonitrile is the more popular choice. Isopropanol (2-propanol) can also be used, because of its strong eluting properties, but its use is limited by its high viscosity, which results in higher backpressures. Both acetonitrile and methanol are less viscous than isopropanol, although a mixture of 50:50 percent of methanol:water is also very viscous and causes high backpressures.

All three solvents are essentially UV transparent. This is a crucial property for common reversed phase chromatography since sample components are typically detected by UV detectors. Acetonitrile is more transparent than the others in low UV wavelengths range, therefore it is used almost exclusively when separating molecules with weak or no chromophores (UV-VIS absorbing groups), such as peptides. Most peptides only absorb at low wavelengths in the ultra-violet spectrum (typically less than 225 nm) and acetonitrile provides much lower background absorbance at low wavelengths than the other common solvents.

The pH of the mobile phase can have an important role on the retention of an analyte and can change the selectivity of certain analytes. For samples containing solutes with ionized functional groups, such as amines, carboxyls, phosphates, phosphonates, sulfates, and sulfonates, the ionization of these groups can be controlled using mobile phase buffers.

For example, carboxylic groups in solutes become increasingly negatively charged as the pH of the mobile phase rises above their pKa, hence the whole molecule becomes more polar and less retained on the a-polar stationary phase. In this case, raising the pH of the phase mobile above 4–5 = pH (which is the typical pKa range for carboxylic groups) increases their ionization, hence decreases their retention. Conversely, using a mobile phase at a pH lower than 4 will increase their retention, because it will decrease their ionization degree, rendering them less polar.

The same considerations apply to substances containing basic functional groups, such as amines, whose pKa ranges are around 8 and above, are retained more, as the pH of the mobile phase increases, approaching 8 and above, because they are less ionized, hence less polar. However, in the case of high pH mobile phases, most of the traditional silica gel based Reversed Phase columns are generally limited for use with mobile phases at pH 8 and above, therefore, control over the retention of amines in this range is limited.

The choice of buffer type is an important factor in RP-LC method development, as it can affect the retention, selectivity, and resolution of the analytes of interest. When selecting a buffer for RP-HPLC, there are a number of factors to consider, including:

* *The desired pH of the mobile phase*: Buffers are most effective around their pKa value, so it is important to choose a buffer with a pKa that is close to the desired mobile phase pH needed.
* *The solubility of the buffer in the organic solvent*: The buffer must be compatible with the organic solvent that is being used in the mobile phase, mostly with the common organic solvents mentioned above, acetonitrile, methanol, and isopropanol.
* *The UV cut-off of the buffer*: In case of UV detection, the buffer should have a UV absorption that is below the detection wavelength of the analytes of interest. This will prevent the buffer from interfering with the detection of that analytes.

* *The compatibility of the buffer with the detector*: If mass spectrometry (MS) is being used for detection, the buffer must be compatible with the mass spectrometry (MS) instrument. Some buffers, such as those containing phosphate salts, cannot be used with the MS detectors, as they are not volatile as needed, and they interfere with the MS detection by suppressing the analytes ionization, making them undetected by MS.

Some of the most common buffers used in RP-HPLC include:

* **Phosphate buffers**: Phosphate buffer is versatile and can be used to achieve a wide range of pH values, thanks to 3 pKa values. They also have very low UV background for UV detection. However, they are not appropriate for MS detection.
* **Acetate buffers**: Acetate buffers are also versatile and can be used to achieve range of pH values typically used in RP-LC. In terms of UV detection at sub 220 nm wavelength, it is not so favorable. The ammonium acetate buffer is compatible with MS.
* **Formate buffers**: Formate buffers is similar to the acetate buffer in terms of range of pHs used and limited UV detection under 225 nm. Its ammonium acetate is also compatible with MS.
* **Ammonium buffers**: Ammonium buffers are volatile and are often used in LC-MS methods. They also are limited for low UV detection.

Charged analytes can be separated on a reversed-phase column by the use of ion-pairing (also called ion-interaction). This technique is known as reversed-phase ion-pairing chromatography.

Elution can be performed isocratically (the water-solvent composition does not change during the separation process) or by using a solution gradient (the water-solvent composition changes during the separation process, usually by decreasing the polarity).

* Tables summarizing different types of reverse phases, and information on the functionalization process


title: Narottam Lal Joshi

abstract: Narottam Lal Joshi was an Indian politician who served as the first Speaker of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly from 31 March 1952 to 25 April 1957 and the Congress MLA of Jhunjhunu. Being associated with the national ideology for many years, Joshi participated in the Indian independence movement and played an active role in the Prajamandal movements against feudal exploitation. After India's independence, in the first general election held in India in 1952, Joshi became a member of the Legislative Assembly and was elected as the first Speaker of the first Rajasthan Legislative Assembly on 31 March 1952.

text:
# Narottam Lal Joshi

**Narottam Lal Joshi** (16 December 1914 – 3 December 1994) was an Indian politician who served as the first Speaker of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly from 31 March 1952 to 25 April 1957 and the Congress MLA of Jhunjhunu.

Being associated with the national ideology for many years, Joshi participated in the Indian independence movement and played an active role in the Prajamandal movements against feudal exploitation. After India's independence, in the first general election held in India in 1952, Joshi became a member of the Legislative Assembly and was elected as the first Speaker of the first Rajasthan Legislative Assembly on 31 March 1952.

## InfoBox

| Narottam Lal Joshi | |
| --- | --- |
|  | |
| Speaker of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly | |
| **In office**
31 March 1952  25 April 1957 | |
| Governor | Man Singh II
Gurumukh Nihal Singh |
| Preceded by | *office established* |
| Succeeded by | Ram Niwas Mirdha |
| Constituency | Nathdwara Assembly constituency |
|  | |
| Personal details | |
| Born | (1914-12-16)16 December 1914
Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, British Raj |
| Died | 3 December 1994(1994-12-03) (aged 79)
Jaipur, Rajasthan, India |
| Political party | Indian National Congress |
| Occupation | Politician |
|  | |


title: Old Style leap year starting on Tuesday

abstract:
This is the calendar for any Old Style leap year starting on Tuesday, 25 March. The Old Style calendar ended the following March, on 24 March. Examples: Julian year 1572, 1656 or 1704. A leap year is a year with 366 days, as compared to a common year, which has 365. Previous year (common) Next year (common)
Previous year (leap) Next year (leap)

text:
# Old Style leap year starting on Tuesday

This is the calendar for any **Old Style leap year starting on Tuesday**, 25 March. The Old Style calendar ended the following March, on 24 March. Examples: Julian year 1572, 1656 or 1704 (see bottom tables).

A leap year is a year with 366 days, as compared to a common year, which has 365.

```
Previous year (common)   Next year (common)
Previous year (leap)     Next year (leap)
```

| Millennium | Century | Old Style Year | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **2nd Millennium**: | **16th century**: | 1516 | 1544 | 1572 |  |
| **2nd Millennium**: | **17th century**: | 1628 | 1656 | 1684 |  |
| **2nd Millennium**: | **18th century**: | 1712 | 1740 | 1768 | 1796 |


title: Zanna Bianca e il grande Kid

abstract: Zanna Bianca e il grande Kid is a 1977 Italian adventure western film directed by Vito Bruschini and starring Tony Kendall, Lea Lander, Fabrizio Mariani and Gordon Mitchell. It is based on the 1906 novel White Fang, by Jack London.

text:
# Zanna Bianca e il grande Kid

***Zanna Bianca e il grande Kid*** is a 1977 Italian adventure western film directed by Vito Bruschini and starring Tony Kendall, Lea Lander, Fabrizio Mariani and Gordon Mitchell. It is based on the 1906 novel *White Fang*, by Jack London.

## Cast

## InfoBox

| Zanna Bianca e il grande Kid | |
| --- | --- |
| Directed by | Vito Bruschini |
| Screenplay by | Vito Bruschini |
| Based on | *White Fang*
by Jack London |
| Produced by | * Irene Quaglia Gobbini * Pelio Quaglia |
| Starring | Tony Kendall |
| Cinematography | Federico Del Zoppo |
| Edited by | Romeo Ciatti |
| Music by | Natala Polizzi |
| Production
company | International Film Constellation |
| Distributed by | Tauro Video |
| Release date | * 1977 (1977) |
| Country | Italy |


title: Ojo in Oz

abstract: Ojo in Oz (1933) is the twenty-seventh book in the Oz series created by L. Frank Baum and his successors, and the thirteenth written by Ruth Plumly Thompson. It was illustrated by John R. Neill. The novel was followed by Speedy in Oz (1934).

text:
# Ojo in Oz

***Ojo in Oz*** (1933) is the twenty-seventh book in the Oz series created by L. Frank Baum and his successors, and the thirteenth written by Ruth Plumly Thompson. It was illustrated by John R. Neill. The novel was followed by *Speedy in Oz* (1934).

## Plot

Ojo (from *The Patchwork Girl of Oz*) is captured by wanderers who plan to turn him over to a mysterious enemy who has offered to pay a large reward to anyone who captures and delivers Ojo to his stronghold at Moojer Mountain. Ojo befriends the gypsies' captive dancing bear Snufferbux (whose full name is Snuffurious, Buxorious, Blundurious Boroso). The gypsies are in turn captured by Realbad, the leader of a gang of bandits, who carries a secret that is connected to the Munchkin boy and his habitually closemouthed guardian Unc Nunkie. Realbad learns about the reward and resolves to collect it himself by delivering Ojo to Moojer Mountain. Separated from the bandit gang, and hopelessly lost, Ojo and Snufferbux reluctantly agree to travel with Realbad (who is a resourceful survivalist) until they either get to the Emerald City or to Moojer Mountain. While traveling, they face various dangers together and gradually develop a genuine friendship.

Meanwhile, Dorothy, Scraps, and the Cowardly Lion set out to rescue Ojo, but get lost themselves, and visit Dicksey Land and other strange places. Everyone is menaced by a fearsome wizard, and Ojo learns who his parents are.

## Reception

*The Los Angeles Times* said, "What with unicorns and a dancing bear and a frightful gentleman whose face is made up of gearwheels, there are plenty of interesting people in this eventful story." *The Minneapolis Star Tribune* agreed that the book's adventures "are as fantastic as anything that ever happened in Oz."

In *A Brief Guide to Oz*, Paul Simpson notes, "*Ojo in Oz* has attracted some negative attention from recent scholars for the highly stereotypical way in which Thompson describes the Gypsies who feature heavily within the story, and for their eventual fate — others who commit the same crimes are simply transformed into other creatures, but the Gypsies are banished to Southern Europe."

| **The *Oz* books** | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Previous book:
***The Purple Prince of Oz*** | ***Ojo in Oz***
1933 | Next book:
***Speedy in Oz*** |

## InfoBox

Ojo in Oz
| Cover of *Ojo in Oz*. | |
| --- | --- |
| Author | Ruth Plumly Thompson |
| Illustrator | John R. Neill |
| Language | English |
| Series | The Oz Books |
| Genre | Children's novel |
| Publisher | Reilly & Lee |
| Publication date | 1933 |
| Publication place | United States |
| Media type | Print (Hardcover) |
| Pages | 304 |
| Preceded by | *The Purple Prince of Oz* |
| Followed by | *Speedy in Oz* |


title: Vinand Nantulya

abstract: Vinand Mukatabala Nantulya, is a Ugandan physician, pathologist, medical researcher, entrepreneur and academic administrator, who since 3 October 2017, serves as the Chancellor of Busitema University, a public university in the Eastern Region of Uganda.

text:
# Vinand Nantulya

**Vinand Mukatabala Nantulya**, is a Ugandan physician, pathologist, medical researcher, entrepreneur and academic administrator, who since 3 October 2017, serves as the Chancellor of Busitema University, a public university in the Eastern Region of Uganda.

## Early life and education

Nantulya was born on 15 January 1949 at Bulayila Village, in present-day Kibuku District, the son of Brenda Kirangi and Paulo Mukatabala.

He started his schooling at Bulangira Roman Catholic School from Primary 1 to 4. He then transferred to Kachomo Primary School for Primary 5 and 6. He studied at St. Peter's College Tororo, for his Ordinary-Level and then transferred to Ntare School in Mbarara, where he completed his Advanced-Level studies. He graduated from Ntare with a High School Diploma. He was admitted to the University of Dar es Salaam, in Tanzania, to pursue a degree in human medicine.

Nantulya graduated with the degree of Doctor of Medicine from the University of Dar es Salaam. After internship at Mulago National Referral Hospital, back in his native Uganda, Nantulya won a scholarship to study outside the country and specialize in Immunology. He enrolled for a Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Nairobi. As part of his training, he carried out research in the immunology of infectious diseases in Switzerland. Later, he was conferred with the title of Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists.

## Career

After his internship at Mulago Hospital, Nantulya was employed as a teaching assistant at Makerere University School of Medicine. After his PhD studies at the University of Nairobi, he was hired as a research fellow at the International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases (ILRAD), in Nairobi. While there, he began lecturing at Harvard University. He became the senior research scientist in international health at the Harvard School of Public Health. He also served as a professor of health and international relations at the University of Geneva and senior fellow at the University of the Sciences in Philadelphia. In 2002 he was appointed as senior health adviser at The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, in Geneva.

From 2010 until 2016, Nantulya served as Chairman of the Uganda AIDS Commission. He resigned that position in December 2016. On 3 October 2017, Professor Vinand Mukatabala Nantulya was installed as the second Chancellor of Busitema University, replacing the founding chancellor, Professor Francis Omaswa, whose ten-year service had expired.

Nantulya served on the selection committee that chose Peter Sands to succeed Mark Dybul as executive director of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) in 2017.

Nantulya developed a vaccine called *Kuku Star*, that prevents New Castle Disease in chicken. He manufactures the vaccine in his company, **Brentec Vaccine Limited**, named after his mother, Brenda Kirangi. His other company, **Astel Diagnostics Limited**, manufactures rapid diagnostic tests against a number of diseases. He serves as a senior advisor on Vaccines and Pharmaceuticals to the President of Uganda.

In June 2020, the *Daily Monitor* reported that one of Nantulya's laboratories had designed a test for the COVID-19 virus in humans that returns results in five minutes as opposed to 45 minutes or three hours by other methods. The new testing method is undergoing the requisite regulatory approval before being subjected to mass testing in the field.

## Personal life

Nantulya is married to Dr. Florence Nakimwero Nantulya, a pediatrician, who practices at Nakasero Hospital, in Kampala, Uganda's capital city. Together, they are parents to five adult children.

## InfoBox

| Vinand Nantulya | |
| --- | --- |
| Born | (1946-01-15) 15 January 1946
Bulayila Village, Kibuku District, Uganda |
| Nationality | Ugandan |
| Citizenship | Uganda |
| Alma mater | **University of Dar es Salaam**
(Doctor of Medicine)
**University of Nairobi**
(Doctor of Philosophy)
**Royal College of Pathologists**
(Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists) |
| Occupation(s) | Physician, Pathologist & Academic |
| Years active | 1972 — present |
| Known for | Academics |
| Title | Chancellor of Busitema University |
| Spouse | Dr. Florence Nantulya |


abstract: The All-Ireland Senior Hurling Championship of 1963 was the 77th staging of Ireland's premier hurling knock-out competition. Kilkenny won the championship, beating Waterford 4-17 to 6-8 in the final at Croke Park, Dublin.

text:
# 1963 All-Ireland Senior Hurling Championship

The **All-Ireland Senior Hurling Championship of 1963** was the 77th staging of Ireland's premier hurling knock-out competition. Kilkenny won the championship, beating Waterford 4-17 to 6-8 in the final at Croke Park, Dublin.

## The championship

### Format

#### Munster Championship

*First round:* (2 matches) These are two matches between the first four teams drawn from the province of Munster. Two teams are eliminated at this stage while the two winners advance to the semi-finals.

*Semi-finals:* (2 matches) The winners of the two first round games join the other two Munster teams to make up the semi-final pairings. Two teams are eliminated at this stage while the winners advance to the final.

*Final:* (1 match) The winner of the two semi-finals contest this game. One team is eliminated at this stage while the winners advance to the All-Ireland final.

#### Leinster Championship

*First round:* (1 match) This is a single match between the first two teams drawn from the province of Leinster. One team is eliminated at this stage while the winners advance to the semi-finals.

*Semi-finals:* (2 matches) The winner of the first round joins the other three Leinster teams to make up the semi-final pairings. Two teams are eliminated at this stage while the winners advance to the final.

*Final:* (1 match) The winner of the two semi-finals contest this game. One team is eliminated at this stage while the winners advance to the All-Ireland final.

#### All-Ireland Championship

*Final:* (1 match) The champions of Munster and Leinster contest this game.

## Results

### Leinster Senior Hurling Championship

| Carlow | 5-5  3-7 | Offaly |
| --- | --- | --- |
| W. Hogan (3-1), W. Walsh (1-0), P. Hickey (1-0), M. Morrissey (0-1), P. Freaney (0-1), M. O'Brien (0-1), L. Walsh (0-1). |  | P. Molloy (2-1), E. Fox (1-1), M. Green (0-1), G. Kirwan (0-1), A. Hoctor (0-1), A. Dooley (0-1), B. Loughnane (0-1). |

O'Moore Park, PortlaoiseReferee: J. Hatton (Wicklow)

---

| Carlow | 3-8  2-3 | Westmeath |
| --- | --- | --- |
| L. Walsh (0-5), J. McCarthy (1-1), W. Walsh (1-1), R. Hickey (1-0), W. Hogan (0-1). |  | T. Ring (1-1), J. Rooney (1-0), J. Carey (0-2). |

O'Moore Park, PortlaoiseReferee: T. Coleman (Laois)

---

| Dublin | 3-12  3-5 | Carlow |
| --- | --- | --- |
| F. Whelan (1-5), M. Kennedy (1-4), M. Bermingham (1-1), W. Jackson (0-1), M. Hayes (0-1). |  | W. Walsh (2-3), W. Hogan (1-1), P. O'Connell (0-1). |

Nowlan Park, KilkennyReferee: E. Kelly (Laois)

---

| Kilkenny | 4-9  3-8 | Wexford |
| --- | --- | --- |
| E. Keher (2-5), T. Walsh (1-0), T. Murphy (1-0), S. Cleere (0-3), T. Kelly (0-1). |  | O. McGrath (1-2), J. O'Brien (1-1), A. Quirke (1-0), P. Lynch (0-3), N. Wheeler (0-1), P. Wilson (0-1). |

Croke Park, DublinReferee: J. Hatton (Wicklow)

---

| Kilkenny | 2-10  0-9 | Dublin |
| --- | --- | --- |
| E. Keher (0-5), S. Clohessy (1-1), J. McGovern (1-0), W. O'Dwyer (0-1), A. Kelly (0-1), P. Moran (0-1). |  | M. Bermingham (0-5), M. Kennedy (0-2), F. Whelan (0-1), D. Ferguson (0-1). |

Croke Park, DublinAttendance: 33,438Referee: T. Coleman (Laois)

---

|  | First round | | |  |  | Quarter-final | | |  |  | Semi-finals | | |  |  | Leinster final | | |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | | |  |  |  | | |  |  | Kilkenny | | 4-9 |  |  | | | | |
|  |  | | |  |  | |  |  | Wexford | | 3-8 |  ||
|  |  | | |  |  |  | | |  |  |  | | |  | |
|  |  | | |  |  |  | | |  | | || |
|  |  | | |  |  | | | | | | |  | Kilkenny | | | 2-10 |  |
|  |  | | |  |  | | | | |  | |  |  | Dublin | | 0-9 |  |
|  |  | | |  |  |  | | |  | | |  |  | | |  |
|  |  | | |  |  |  | | |  | | ||
|  |  | | |  |  |  | | |  | | |  | Dublin | | | 3-12 |  |
|  |  | | |  |  | |  |  | Carlow | | | | 3-5 | |  |
|  |  | | |  |  | Carlow | | 3-8 |  | | |  | | | | | |
|  | Carlow | | 5-5 |  |  | Westmeath | | 2-3 |  | | ||
|  | Offaly | | 3-7 |  |  | | | | | | ||

### Munster Senior Hurling Championship

| Cork | 4-15  2-11 | Clare |
| --- | --- | --- |
| R. Browne (3-0), M. Mortell (0-6), P. Harte (0-4), J. Barry (1-0), T. Corbett (0-3), N. Gallagher (0-2), |  | J. Smyth (1-7), M. O'Shea (1-3), N. Jordan (0-1). |

Thurles Sportsfield, Thurles

---

| Limerick | 3-9  2-7 | Galway |
| --- | --- | --- |
| T. McGarry (1-1), M. O'Brien (1-0), T. Bluett (1-0), P. Cobb (0-3), P. J. Keane (0-2), B. Hartigan (0-2), L. Hogan (0-1). |  | S. Murray (1-1), J. Murray (1-0), M. Cullinane (0-3), T. Sweeney (0-2), J. Conroy (0-1). |

Cusack Park, EnnisAttendance: 10,000

---

| Tipperary | 4-7  1-11 | Cork |
| --- | --- | --- |
| S. McLoughlin (3-0), J. McKenna (1-0), Jimmy Doyle (0-3), L. Kiely (0-1), T. Ryan (0-1), T. English (0-1), D. Nealon (0-1). |  | P. Harte (0-6), P. Barry (1-0), M. Mortell (0-2), R. Browne (0-2), C. O'Shea (0-1). |

Gaelic Grounds, LimerickAttendance: 30,000Referee: S. Power (Waterford)

---

| Waterford | 2-15  3-6 | Limerick |
| --- | --- | --- |
| P. Grimes (1-3), J. Barron (1-0), S. Power (0-3), M. Flanelly (0-3), J. Meaney (0-2), F. Walsh (0-2), J. Condon (0-1), M. Óg Morrissey (0-1). |  | T. Bluett (2-0), M. O'Brien (1-0), M. Tynan (0-2), T. McGarry (0-2), M. Rainford (0-1), K. Long (0-1). |

Cork Athletic Grounds, CorkAttendance: 24,000

---

| Waterford | 0-11  0-8 | Tipperary |
| --- | --- | --- |
| P. Grimes (0-8), J. Condon (0-1), F. Walsh (0-1), S. Power (0-1). |  | Jimmy Doyle (0-4), T. English (0-1), L. Deveaney (0-1), L. Kiely (0-1), D. Nealon (0-1). |

Gaelic Grounds, LimerickAttendance: 36,000Referee: G. FitzGerald (Limerick)

---

|  | Quarter-finals | | |  |  | Semi-finals | | |  |  | Munster final | | |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  | Limerick | | 3-9 |  |  | | | | |  | | | | |
|  | Galway | | 2-7 |  |  | Waterford | | 2-15 |  | |
|  |  | | |  |  | Limerick | | 3-6 |  | |
|  |  | | |  |  |  | | |  |  | Waterford | | 0-11 |  |
|  |  | | |  |  | |  |  | Tipperary | | 0-8 |  |
|  |  | | |  |  | Tipperary | | 4-7 |  |  |  | | |  |
|  | Cork | | 4-15 |  |  | Cork | | 1-11 |  | | ||
|  | Clare | | 2-11 |  |  | | | | | | ||

### All-Ireland Senior Hurling Championship

| Kilkenny | 4-17  6-8 | Waterford |
| --- | --- | --- |
| E. Keher (0-14), T. Murphy (2-1), T. Walsh (2-0), S. Cleere (0-2). |  | S. Power (3-0), P. GRimes (1-4), M. Flanelly (2-0), F. Walsh (0-2), M. Dempsey (0-1), J. Condon (0-1). |

Croke Park, DublinAttendance: 73,123Referee: J. Hatton (Wicklow)

---

## Championship statistics

### Miscellaneous

* Waterford's Munster final victory was their last until 2002.
* The All-Ireland final was Waterford's ninth time playing at Croke Park. It would be 1998 before the team returned to the stadium for an All-Ireland semi-final against Kilkenny. It would be 2008 before Waterford played in another All-Ireland final where, once again, the opposition turned out to be Kilkenny.

## Top scorers

### Season

| Rank | Player | County | Tally | Total | Matches | Average |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Eddie Keher | Kilkenny | 2-24 | 30 | 3 | 10.00 |
| 2 | Philly Grimes | Waterford | 2-15 | 21 | 3 | 7.00 |
| 3 | Willie Walsh | Carlow | 4-04 | 16 | 3 | 5.33 |
| 4 | Willie Hogan | Carlow | 4-03 | 15 | 3 | 5.00 |
| 5 | Séamus Power | Waterford | 3-04 | 13 | 3 | 4.33 |

### Single game

| Rank | Player | County | Tally | Total | Opposition |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Eddie Keher | Kilkenny | 0-14 | 14 | Waterford |
| 2 | Eddie Keher | Kilkenny | 2-5 | 11 | Wexford |
| 3 | Willie Hogan | Carlow | 3-1 | 10 | Offaly |
| | Jimmy Smyth | Clare | 1-7 | 10 | Cork |
| 4 | Richie Browne | Cork | 3-0 | 9 | Clare |
| | Seán McLoughlin | Tipperary | 3-0 | 9 | Waterford |
| | Séamus Power | Waterford | 3-0 | 9 | Kilkenny |
| | Willie Walsh | Carlow | 2-3 | 9 | Dublin |
| 8 | Fran Whelan | Dublin | 1-5 | 8 | Carlow |
| | Philly Grimes | Waterford | 0-8 | 8 | Tipperary |

* Corry, Eoghan, *The GAA Book of Lists* (Hodder Headline Ireland, 2005).
* Donegan, Des, *The Complete Handbook of Gaelic Games* (DBA Publications Limited, 2005).

## InfoBox

1963 All-Ireland Senior Hurling Championship
| Championship details | |
| --- | --- |
| Dates | 12 May - 1 September 1963 |
| Teams | 11 |
| All-Ireland champions | |
| Winning team | Kilkenny (15th win) |
| Captain | Séamus Cleere |
| All-Ireland Finalists | |
| Losing team | Waterford |
| Captain | Joe Condon |
| Provincial champions | |
| Munster | Waterford |
| Leinster | Kilkenny |
| Ulster | Not Played |
| Connacht | Not Played |
| Championship statistics | |
| No. matches played | 10 |
| Top Scorer | Eddie Keher (2-24) |
| Player of the Year | Séamus Cleere |
| All-Star Team | See here |
| 1962  1964 | |


abstract: The 1963 NCAA University Division Golf Championship was the 25th annual NCAA-sanctioned golf tournament to determine the individual and team national champions of men's collegiate golf in the United States. This was the first tournament held exclusively for University Division, now Division I, programs. College Division programs, which now comprise Division II and Division III took part in their own championship, held in Springfield, Missouri and won by Southwest Missouri State. The tournament was held at the Wichita Country Club at the then-Municipal University of Wichita in Wichita, Kansas. Oklahoma State won the team title, the Cowboys' first NCAA team national title.

text:
# 1963 NCAA University Division golf championship

The **1963 NCAA University Division Golf Championship** was the 25th annual NCAA-sanctioned golf tournament to determine the individual and team national champions of men's collegiate golf in the United States.

This was the first tournament held exclusively for University Division, now Division I, programs. College Division programs, which now comprise Division II and Division III took part in their own championship, held in Springfield, Missouri and won by Southwest Missouri State.

The tournament was held at the Wichita Country Club at the then-Municipal University of Wichita in Wichita, Kansas.

Oklahoma State won the team title, the Cowboys' first NCAA team national title.

## Individual results

### Individual champion

### Tournament medalist

## Team results

| Rank | Team | Score |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | **Oklahoma State** | **581** |
| 2 | Houston (DC) | 582 |
| 3 | North Texas State | 585 |
| 4 | USC | 587 |
| 5 | Georgia | 590 |
| T6 | Texas | 591 |
| | Wake Forest | |
| 8 | Navy | 595 |
| 9 | Stanford | 596 |
| 10 | Washington | 597 |

* Note: Top 10 only
* DC = Defending champions

## InfoBox

1963 NCAA University Division Golf Championship
| Tournament information | |
| --- | --- |
| Location | Wichita, Kansas, U.S.
37°42′20″N 97°14′11″W / 37.7056°N 97.2365°W / 37.7056; -97.2365 |
| Course(s) | Wichita Country Club |
| Statistics | |
| Field | 30 teams |
| Champion | |
| **Team:** Oklahoma State (1st title)
**Individual:** R. H. Sikes, Arkansas | |
| Location map | |
| Wichita C.C.Location in the United StatesWichita C.C.Location in Kansas | |
|  | |


title: 1959–60 FK Partizan season

text:
# 1959–60 FK Partizan season

The 1959–60 season was the 14th season in FK Partizan's existence. This article shows player statistics and matches that the club played during the 1959–60 season.

## Players

### Squad information

Note: Flags indicate national team as defined under FIFA eligibility rules. Players may hold more than one non-FIFA nationality.

| No. Pos. Nation Player  GK  YUG Jovan Ćurčić  GK  YUG Milutin Šoškić  GK  YUG Slavko Stojanović  DF  YUG Bruno Belin  DF  YUG Aleksandar Jončić  DF  YUG Fahrudin Jusufi  DF  YUG Milorad Milutinović  DF  YUG Lazar Radović  MF  YUG Velimir Sombolac  MF  YUG Velibor Vasović  MF  YUG Tomislav Kaloperović | No. Pos. Nation Player  MF  YUG Branislav Mihajlović  MF  YUG Zoran Miladinović  MF  YUG Bora Milutinović  MF  YUG Bozidar Pajević  MF  YUG Milan Vukelić  FW  YUG Srđan Čebinac  FW  YUG Zvezdan Čebinac  FW  YUG Milan Galić  FW  YUG Pavle Kiš  FW  YUG Vladica Kovačević |
| --- | --- |

## Friendlies

| 26 August 1959 Friendly | **Partizan** | **2–1** | **MTK Budapest** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Kaloperović  pen.'
Galić |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 40,000 |

| 17 September 1959 Friendly | **Dinamo Zagreb** | **2–2** | **Partizan** | Zagreb |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Galić
Kaloperović | Stadium: Stadion Maksimir
Attendance: 9,000
Referee: Mikulan |

| 18 October 1959 Friendly | **Partizan** | **1–4** | **Yugoslavia** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Blažić  72' |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 10,000
Referee: Zečević |

| 6 February 1960 Friendly | **Hapoel Tel Aviv** | **0–1** | **Partizan** | Tel-Aviv, Israel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Čebinac  67' |  |

| 9 February 1960 Friendly | **Israel** | **1–2** | **Partizan** | Tel-Aviv, Israel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Kaloperović  11'
Vukelić  56' |  |

| 13 February 1960 Friendly | **Hapoel Petah Tikva** | **2–3** | **Partizan** | Petah Tikva, Israel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Vukelić  7'
Mihajlović  17'
Kovačević  50' |  |

| 15 February 1960 Friendly | **Hapoel Haifa** | **2–5** | **Partizan** | Haifa, Israel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Vukelić  7'
Galić  46', 48', 90'
Kaloperović  77' (pen.) | Attendance: 10,000 |

| 21 February 1960 Friendly | **Partizan** | **2–1** | **Legia Warsaw** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Mihajlović  63'
Mitić  75' (pen.) |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 15,000
Referee: Života Bajić |

| 8 June 1960 Friendly | **Juventus** | **1–1** | **Partizan** | Turin, Italy |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Galić  26' | Stadium: Stadio Comunale
Attendance: 20,000 |

## Competitions

### Yugoslav First League

| Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Red Star Belgrade (C) | 22 | 15 | 3 | 4 | 47 | 25 | +22 | 33 | Qualification for European Cup preliminary round |
| 2 | Dinamo Zagreb | 22 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 48 | 20 | +28 | 32 | Qualification for Cup Winners' Cup first round |
| 3 | Partizan | 22 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 49 | 29 | +20 | 27 |  |
| 4 | Vojvodina | 22 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 36 | 22 | +14 | | 27 |
| 5 | Hajduk Split | 22 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 47 | 26 | +21 | | 26 |

Source: rsssf.org
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
(C) Champions

| 30 August 1959 1 | **Hajduk Split** | **1–1** | **Partizan** | Split |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Mihajlović  21' | Stadium: Stadion Stari plac
Attendance: 15,000
Referee: Ivanovski (Skopje) |

| 6 September 1959 2 | **Budućnost** | **2–4** | **Partizan** | Titograd |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Kaloperović  2'
Mihajlović  17'
Z. Čebinac  23'
Miladinović  27' | Stadium: Podgorica City Stadium
Attendance: 6,000
Referee: Kranjc (Zagreb) |

| 12 September 1959 3 | **Partizan** | **3–3** | **Velež** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Kaloperović  61', 84' (pen.), 86' |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 20,000
Referee: Erlich (Ljubljana) |

| 20 September 1959 4 | **Rijeka** | **1–6** | **Partizan** | Rijeka |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Mihajlović  8', 13'
Kovačević  15', 56'
Galić  37'
Vasović  90' | Stadium: Stadion Kantrida
Attendance: 12,000
Referee: Stanišić (Sarajevo) |

| 27 September 1959 5 | **Partizan** | **0–3** | **Crvena zvezda** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 50,000 |

| 4 October 1959 6 | **Sarajevo** | **1–2** | **Partizan** | Sarajevo |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Mihajlović  58'
Galić  85' | Stadium: City Stadium Koševo
Attendance: 20,000
Referee: Varaždinec (Zagreb) |

| 1 November 1959 7 | **Partizan** | **1–2** | **Radnički Beograd** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Miladinović  32' |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 10,000
Referee: Kranjc (Zagreb) |

| 8 November 1959 8 | **Sloboda Tuzla** | **0–2** | **Partizan** | Tuzla |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Kaloperović  57'
Galić  59' | Stadium: Tušanj City Stadium
Attendance: 5,000
Referee: Tešanić (Varaždin) |

| 22 November 1959 9 | **Partizan** | **2–1** | **Dinamo Zagreb** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Vukelić  26'
Jusufi  69' |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 25,000
Referee: Ivanovski (Skopje) |

| 30 November 1959 10 | **OFK Beograd** | **0–5** | **Partizan** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | S. Čebinac  11', 14'
Z. Čebinac  63'
Kovačević  65'
Mitić  89' | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 15,000
Referee: Zečević (Beograd) |

| 6 December 1959 11 | **Partizan** | **0–1** | **Vojvodina** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 25,000
Referee: Nedelkovski (Skopje) |

| 12 March 1960 12 | **Partizan** | **2–1** | **Hajduk Split** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Radović  35'
Galić  73' |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 25,000
Referee: Stanković (Niš) |

| 19 March 1960 13 | **Partizan** | **0–0** | **Budućnost** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 12,000
Referee: Gvardijančič (Ljubljana) |

| 27 March 1960 14 | **Velež** | **1–0** | **Partizan** | Mostar |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  |  | Attendance: 8,000 |

| 3 April 1960 15 | **Partizan** | **2–0** | **Rijeka** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Mihajlović  31'
S. Čebinac  79' |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 15,000
Referee: Telebak (Sarajevo) |

| 17 April 1960 16 | **Crvena zvezda** | **1–1** | **Partizan** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Toplak  56' |  | Kovačević  52' | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 50,000 |

| 30 April 1960 17 | **Partizan** | **4–1** | **Sarajevo** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Galić  18'
Kovačević  22', 62'
Mihajlović  86' |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 15,000
Referee: Kranjc (Zagreb) |

| 15 May 1960 18 | **Radnički Beograd** | **0–4** | **Partizan** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Galić  27', 61' (pen.)
Kovačević  48' (pen.)
Z. Čebinac  64' | Attendance: 15,000
Referee: Petrošić (Split) |

| 29 May 1960 19 | **Partizan** | **3–1** | **Sloboda Tuzla** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Vukelić  11'
Radović  45'
Galić  61' |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 3,000 |

| 5 June 1960 20 | **Dinamo Zagreb** | **4–3** | **Partizan** | Zagreb |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Galić  8', 16'
Radović  89' | Stadium: Stadion Maksimir
Attendance: 40,000 |

| 11 June 1960 21 | **Partizan** | **2–3** | **OFK Beograd** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Radović  20', 31' |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 20,000 |

| 19 June 1960 22 | **Vojvodina** | **2–2** | **Partizan** | Novi Sad |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Mitić  22'
Mihajlović  64' | Stadium: Karađorđe Stadium
Attendance: 16,000
Referee: Stanković (Niš) |

### Yugoslav Cup

| 2 December 1959 First round | **Crvena zvezda** | **2–2**
(**5–6** ) | **Partizan** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Kaloperović  53'
Kovačević  115' | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 35,000 |

| 13 December 1959 Second round | **Spartak Subotica** | **3–4 (a.e.t.)** | **Partizan** | Subotica |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Galić  57', 64', 102'
Mitić  96' | Stadium: Subotica City Stadium
Attendance: 10,000
Referee: Stanišić |

| 28 December 1959 Quarter-finals | **Partizan** | **2–1** | **Željezničar** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Čebinac
Galić |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 18,000 |

| 6 March 1960 Semi-finals | **Velež** | **2–3** | **Partizan** | Mostar |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Kovačević  5'
Galić  41', 86' | Stadium: Stadion pod Bijelim Brijegom
Attendance: 13,000
Referee: Tešanić |

| 26 May 1960 Final | **Dinamo Zagreb** | **3–2** | **Partizan** | Belgrade |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Jerković  14', 53'
Lipošinović  49' |  | Kaloperović  8'
Kovačević  73' | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 40,000
Referee: F. Taslidžić (Osijek) |

### Mitropa Cup

| 3 July 1960 | **Partizan** | **2–1** | **Slovan Bratislava** | Belgrade, Yugoslavia |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | Vukelić  15'
Vasović  72' |  |  | Stadium: JNA Stadium
Attendance: 15,000
Referee: Steiner (Austria) |

| 10 July 1960 | **Slovan Bratislava** | **4–1**
(**5 – 3** agg.) | **Partizan** | Bratislava, Czechoslovakia |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  |  |  | Kovačević  75' | Attendance: 25,000
Referee: Hernadi (Hungary) |

## Statistics

### Goalscorers

This includes all competitive matches.

| Rank | Pos | Nat | Name | **Yugoslav First League** | **Yugoslav Cup** | **Total** |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **1** | FW |  | Milan Galić | 10 | 6 | **16** |
| **2** | MF |  | Vladica Kovačević | 7 | 3 | **10** |
| **3** | FW |  | Branislav Mihajlović | 8 | 0 | **8** |
| **4** | MF |  | Tomislav Kaloperović | 5 | 2 | **7** |
| **5** | MF |  | Lazar Radović | 5 | 0 | **5** |
| **6** | MF |  | Srđan Čebinac | 3 | 1 | **4** |
| **7** | MF |  | Zvezdan Čebinac | 3 | 0 | **3** |
| | MF |  | Ilija Mitić | 2 | 1 | **3** |
| **9** | MF |  | Milan Vukelić | 2 | 0 | **2** |
| | MF |  | Jovan Miladinović | 2 | 0 | **2** |
| **11** | DF |  | Velibor Vasović | 1 | 0 | **1** |
| | DF |  | Fahrudin Jusufi | 1 | 0 | **1** |
| **TOTALS** | | | | **49** | **13** | **62** |

### Score overview

Win   Draw   Loss

| Opposition | Home score | Away score | Aggregate |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Crvena zvezda | 0–3 | 1–1 | 1–4 |
| Dinamo Zagreb | 2–1 | 3–4 | 5–5 |
| Vojvodina | 0–1 | 2–2 | 2–3 |
| Hajduk Split | 2–1 | 1–1 | 3–2 |
| Sarajevo | 4–1 | 2–1 | 6–2 |
| OFK Beograd | 2–3 | 5–0 | 7–3 |
| Rijeka | 2–0 | 6–1 | 8–1 |
| Radnički Beograd | 1–2 | 4–0 | 5–2 |
| Velež | 3–3 | 0–1 | 3–4 |
| Budućnost | 0–0 | 4–2 | 4–2 |
| Sloboda Tuzla | 3–1 | 2–0 | 5–1 |

## InfoBox

Partizan
| 1959–60 season | |
| --- | --- |
| President | Martin Dasović |
| Head coach | Illés Spitz |
| Yugoslav First League | 3rd |
| Yugoslav Cup | Runners-up |
| Top goalscorer | League:
All: Milan Galić |
|  | |


title: 1966–67 Cypriot Second Division

abstract: The 1966–67 Cypriot Second Division was the 12th season of the Cypriot second-level football league. ASIL Lysi won their 1st title.

text:
# 1966–67 Cypriot Second Division

The **1966–67 Cypriot Second Division** was the 12th season of the Cypriot second-level football league. ASIL Lysi won their 1st title.

## Format

Twelve teams participated in the 1966–67 Cypriot Second Division. The league was split to two geographical groups, depending from Districts of Cyprus each participated team came from. All teams of a group played against each other twice, once at their home and once away. The team with the most points at the end of the season crowned group champions. The winners of each group were playing against each other in the final phase of the competition and the winner were the champions of the Second Division. The champion was promoted to 1967–68 Cypriot First Division.

## Changes from previous season

**Teams promoted to 1966–67 Cypriot First Division**

**New members of CFA**

Furthermore, PAEK returns to the league after 2 periods.

## Nicosia-Keryneia-Famagusta Group

League standings

| Pos | Team | Pld | Pts | Qualification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | ASIL Lysi (C, P) | 14 | 40 | Group Champions – Champions Playoffs |
| 2 | Enosis Neon Paralimni FC | 14 | 39 |  |
| 3 | AEK Ammochostos | 14 | | 28 |
| 4 | Orfeas Nicosia | 14 | | 24 |
| 5 | PAEK | 14 | | 23 |
| 6 | ENAD Ayiou Dometiou FC | 14 | | 22 |
| 7 | Keravnos Strovolou FC | 14 | | 21 |
| 8 | Anagennisi Larnacas | 14 | | 13 |

Source:
Rules for classification: 1) Points, 2) Goal differences, 3) Goal for. Points system: Won=3 points, Drawn=2 points, Lost=1 point
(C) Champions; (P) Promoted

## Limassol-Paphos Group

League standings

| Pos | Team | Pld | Pts | Qualification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Evagoras Paphos | 6 | 17 | Group Champions – Champions Playoffs |
| 2 | Enosis Panelliniou-Antaeus Limassol | 6 | 13 |  |
| 3 | Arion Lemesou | 6 | | 12 |
| 4 | Ethnikos Asteras Limassol | 6 | | 6 |

Source:
Rules for classification: 1) Points, 2) Goal differences, 3) Goal for. Points system: Won=3 points, Drawn=2 points, Lost=1 point

## Champions Playoffs

ASIL Lysi were the champions of the Second Division. ASIL Lysi promoted to 1967–68 Cypriot First Division.

## Sources

* "Τελική βαθμολογία Β΄ κατηγορίας". *Philathlos* (in Greek). 1967-04-24. p. 4.
* Cyprus Football Association (July 2014). "Το περιοδικό της ΚΟΠ" (PDF) (in Greek) (9). Nicosia: Cyprus Football Association: 76–79. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-08-31. `{{cite journal}}`: Cite journal requires `|journal=` (help)

## InfoBox

Cypriot Second Division
| Season | 1966–67 |
| --- | --- |
| Champions | ASIL Lysi<br>(1st title) |
| Promoted | ASIL Lysi |
| 1965–66 1967–68 | |