Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ Difficulty scores are estimated using the Qwen 2.5-MATH-7B model with the follow
|
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
- `temperature = 0.6`
|
| 14 |
- `top_p = 0.9`
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
- Inference performed via [vLLM](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm)
|
| 16 |
- Each problem is attempted **128 times**
|
| 17 |
|
|
@@ -20,3 +21,6 @@ The difficulty score for each problem is computed as:
|
|
| 20 |
d_i = 100 × (1 - (# successes / 128))
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
This scoring approach ensures a balanced estimation: a strong model would trivially succeed on all problems, undermining difficulty measurement, while a weak model would fail uniformly, limiting the usefulness of the signal. Qwen 2.5-MATH-7B was chosen for its **mid-range capabilities**, providing **informative gradients** in problem difficulty across the dataset.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
- `temperature = 0.6`
|
| 14 |
- `top_p = 0.9`
|
| 15 |
+
- `max_tokens=4096`
|
| 16 |
- Inference performed via [vLLM](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm)
|
| 17 |
- Each problem is attempted **128 times**
|
| 18 |
|
|
|
|
| 21 |
d_i = 100 × (1 - (# successes / 128))
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
This scoring approach ensures a balanced estimation: a strong model would trivially succeed on all problems, undermining difficulty measurement, while a weak model would fail uniformly, limiting the usefulness of the signal. Qwen 2.5-MATH-7B was chosen for its **mid-range capabilities**, providing **informative gradients** in problem difficulty across the dataset.
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
## Contact
|
| 26 |
+
Feel free to contact Taiwei Shi ([email protected]) if you have any questions.
|