if evalution, then which race is the most evolved?
966375
The differences between races are almost entirely cosmetic. All humans are the same species, and there has been only one species of humans for at least 150,000 years.\n\nThe idea of "speeding up" evolution is not only morally repugnant, it's also pragmatically impossible to pull off. Significant evolution doesn't happen in one or two generations -- it takes many generations. At about 20 years per generation, you'd have to run the program of selective breeding for a minimum of 200 years just to isolate a particular new line. Even then, you've only got a small population of the new line, and for that line to grow to a population of a billion or more people would take thousands of years.\n\nEvolution is a very slow process. People who disbelieve it often do so because they simply can't comprehend how long millions of years are, let alone billions of years.
620386
We would sound really irritating and people would play tricks on us all the time by walking up behind us and plugging up our  breathing hole in our backs. I don't believe in evolution though, or why are there still apes? Adaptation is natural and selective breeding is mutations that we are good with, like with dogs, cats, horses, and cattle. But to think that we were apes is just nonsense, even Darwin recanted most of his theories before he died.
216080
some of my ancestors were headhunters...they actually took pride in eating they enemies...\nIf there is any validity to evolution then you and I ain't nothin but intelligent decendants of monkey brains.\nHowever,if the holy books & all have the truth & nothin but the truth then we all got black in us,therefore,you raggin on all these white folks for nothin...
1122529
Although Darwin opposed slavery, he firmly believed that the evolutionary process had created superior and inferior races. He maintained in Descent of Man that human intellectual development was the product of natural selection and that natural selection had produced significant differences in the mental faculties of "men of distinct races." [See Darwin, Descent (1871), vol. I, pp.109-110, 160, 201, 216.] In the same book, Darwin disparaged blacks and observed that the break in evolutionary history between apes and humans fell "between the negro or Australian and the gorilla," indicating that he considered blacks the humans that were the most ape-like. [Darwin, Descent (1871), vol. I, p. 201] Darwin also predicted that "[a]t some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races." [Darwin, Descent (1871), vol. I, p. 201.] The racist cast of Darwin's thought is difficult to deny.
513066
Well, I think this kind of questions are very debatable.\nNone can answer it correctly. Each race will argue that thier race is stronger and another will deny that.
442866
Some Dude gave a great answer-I would add, just for interest, that the human race has exceedingly little genetic variation compared to other animals.  A recent study showed that an average-sized chimpanzee colony has more genetic variation that the entire human race.  This is presumably because at some point in the recent past (150-200,000 years) our common ancestors existed, and evidently our race must have been very close to going extinct, leaving a very small pool of humans with which to populate the Earth.
1013434
"this question is not about to know the true color of adam and eve actually but to know if humans starts with adam and eve or maybe from ape. All i want to know is how did it happen that there are lots of races."\n\nThe initial question is the question of creationism vs. evolution.  That will continue to be debated until Jesus comes again and we can all get the definitive answer.\n\nAs to why there are so many races, there are many different geographical areas in the world and our physical features have adapted over many generations to allow us to survive in those areas.  \n\nFrom a spiritual point of view:  God wants us to learn is tolerance, patience, understanding and acceptance.  What better way for His children to learn to be more godly (according to His Word - the Bible) than to make us physically different.   Accepting others who look different has been a learning and growing experience for me and I have had some of the most loving and caring friendships with those who "look" different than I.\n\nMy pastor said it best:  God only made two models of people:  male and female.  Then He created the available options for those models.  But underneath it all, we are all God's children, loved equally by God.
533795
evolution. Or perhaps speciation.
1024971
Race: Someones ancestral evolution.\n\nEthnicity: The awareness of someones ancestral evolution.\n\nRacism: Ignorance.
1180342
Creation. Even if evolution were true, the elements that got together and evolved had to have been created. Otherwise something would have to evolve from nothing.
657805
DNA evidence. There's like 98% match between a human and a chimpansee.\n\nFossil record - they keep finding ancestors of modern species, which helps draw out the evolution tree.\n\nBacteria developing resistance to drugs.\n\nDifferent breeds of dogs, horses, agricultural plants and animals.
749343
One's race is not just a color, it is the entire genetic makeup of their people. That is why there are literally hundreds of scientifically provable differences between the races.  These include bone structure, muscle structure, hair texture, hormonal levels, and average intelligence. This is to be expected because there is over 60,000 years of divergent genetic evolution between the races, and this divergent genetic evolution occurred in very different enviroments. Please educate yourself. Your question makes you sound like a naive politically correct sheep who doesn't understand science or history.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence
366522
african or european??
857351
Evolution on other planets surely works just like evolution on earth.  The most the most intelligent and aggressive species dominates.  What ever they look like, in that way they will be like us.
104147
Choose, Evolution. Thats a Hot topic at the moment and there is plenty of information about both sides of the debate.\n\n\nAnhar Hussain Miah
1169587
Races arise through natural evolution according to geography and climate.  People have since the "dawn of man" migrated.  Read your science and history books!\n\nThe "Garden of Eden" ("GOE") is by most archaeologists studying the issue thought to have been in the general region commonly known today as the Middle East, somewhere near the junction (roughly 6000 years ago) of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.\n\nPersons from that region are caucasoids (as opposed to either negroids or mongoloids).\n\nTheories that the GOE was located elsewhere (for instance, in Florida) are not widely accepted.  The "flaming sword" of the angel in the myth has led some to speculate that the GOE is not anymore, and perhaps never was, a terrestrial location.  Again, such speculation is generally regarded as incredible.\n\nWe do not know whether, or by how much, the paths of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers have shifted, and we aren't certain regarding the location of the Pishon and Gihon rivers with which the GOE was associated.\n\nMoreover, the current Tigris and Euphrates may have been named after distant ancient rivers that were either destroyed in a cataclysm or that were overtaken and renamed by conquering nomads; the refugees arriving in the locale of the current rivers naming them after the original rivers.\n\nProof beyond all doubt is an unreasonable standard for any archaeological work.\n\nAlthough archaelogy is a recognized science, much (if not most) of its research relies on anecdotal evidence.  It is this tool, critical to the science of archaeology, that those contesting the veracity of the myth most often wish to dismiss.\n\nHad not the Royal Library of Alexandria been destroyed, we might today have been able to pinpoint where the proverbial couple ate, drank and did other things -- but like so much else, that is merely speculation.
420
Evolutionary theory seems to point toward the egg being first. All animals on earth mutated and evolved from the first life forms. It's likely that the first chicken as we know it today hatched after eons of genetic mutations and changes.