Where does time go. As time is not destroyed it must still be there with us inprinted on it. Can it be rewound
969010
What a debatable query! Very much suited to my interests. :)\n\n            First things first. Doorman proposed a fabrication that amused me. My beloved, time can bear itself in energy, yet memory hold itself solitary in such consideration. Memory is another term one is to consider in terms of biological structures, not energy. Were time to store itself in such energy one to explode by the time they get old XP. Yet your proposition holds itself true in one aspect. We forget. Like we lose energy. Yet memory holds itself in alliance to life, an indescribable, unphysical term.\n\n            Now for my proposal. We bear to our knowledge the sphere of our vision. What we see, we believe. Yet we go on FORWARD in time. Like a fluid. Space-Time-Continuum...\n\n            In accordance to one of Einstein's theory, the time holds itself in a stretch of another dimension all together. We know so much of time, yet in reality we know N-O-T-H-I-N-G.\n\n           Ask me why? The answer bears itself in utmost simplicity. We can only conclude on matters we are able perceive in correct mannerism. We do not bear such a sense organ nor are we able to implement over 4% of our brain, so as to perceive the concept of time in proper ideology. Therefore we cannot forge a concept concrete enough to bear the yoke of your question.\n\n          Yet we can ALWAYS speculate! In such speculations, we can come to many ways to rewind time. Suppose time IS a fabric. A vast expanse of infinite non-molecular material. If we are to possess a way to make a cut in this fabric, we can gain access to two different periods in time.\n\n          Now here's the boomer. What if time DOES repeat itself? Now stick to me while I take you to a psycho flight. Seatbelts on? good.\n\n         So far we have considered time to be a concept in whose relation we all exist. Now imagine this. WHAT if time is relative to every individual? No-one has been able to explain the term 'life'. Maybe this is because life IS time? What we consider time is the fabruication of us mortals. What if time exists independently for everyone? When one perishes, he is actually going to REPEAT his so called 'life'. Perhaps he period from the Big Bang to the collapse of the universe has repeated itself millions of times already!\n\n             Now thats a speculation. No-one can state it correct or incorrect, for one doesnot bear such perception. Perhaps we are just the play-stuff of a larger colossal existence. Then again, what is existence?
256332
Time and space is distorted everywhere by everything. That is not a wild statement it is the truth. matter, any matter or energy, by its nature distorts space and time at a predictable magnitude.
187337
how can something without a boundary, like the universe,  have a center?\nand yes, time is subjective. basically i think it's only a measurement of life.
575355
Time refers only here on Earth. Where there is 24 hours in a day. In space, time does not exist. If you travel millions of light years away and then come back, you'll find out that people you know are way older than the last time you saw them.
533293
Time is a property of this universe only - this is not only a belief of Christian cosmology, it is also the standard belief of modern scientific cosmology, the way Stephen Hawking modeled it in "A Brief History of Time." Time is quite specific to our universe. Time has no meaning or applicability outside of the universe.\n\nSince God, from "outside" or "above" our universe, is a non-temporal being  - totally outside time and all its concepts - temporal concepts such as "beginning", "created" or "origins" are utterly inapplicable. They quite literally have no meaning where God is concerned. God's today is also his yesterday, which is also his tomorrow. He does not originate because origination only means something in the context of time. It may be difficult for beings such as ourselves to understand existing outside of time, because we are stuck in it. But the limits of our imagination are a problem for our comprehension, and not a problem for God's existence.\n\nAs St. Augustine said:\n\n'Nor do you precede any given period of time by another period of time, or you would not precede all periods of time. In the eminence of your ever-present eternity, you precede  all times past, and extend beyond all future times, for they are still to come--and when they have come, they will be past. But "you are always the same and your years shall have no end." Your years neither go nor come; but ours both go and come in order that all separate moments may come to pass. All your years stand together as one, since they are abiding. Nor do your years past exclude the years to come because your years do not pass away. All these years of ours shall be with you, when all of them have ceased to be. Your years are but a day, and your day is not recurrent, but always today. Your "today" does not yield to tomorrow and does not follow yesterday. Your "today" is eternity. '
316322
I won't give a lengthy answer about this but why would we get rid of something just because it strays from its original creation?  That would be like getting rid of technology because we didn't have it as advanced in our history.
71991
cool question ! i dont believe in time travle , and thats a good point ! thanks
867782
Great Question! I have the answer!\n\nImagine you are moving an object from left to right. You will see there is a displacement and a definite time taken to move from one place to the other. \nImagine you are moving faster. Notice that the time reduces.\nNow you are moving in ultrafast speed such that the time taken is nearly zero. \nWhat does this mean? There has been a displacement with no time. \nThis is what is called Yoga! Ancient Saints use to travel in time space exactly by controlling their displacement at no interval of time.\nSo do not confuse yourself with the things which will not happen with our life.\n\nTimelessness would be felt in time machines, where in the the machine travels at a speed equal to infinity. Or atleast close to infinity!\n\nOk! is it possible to have a timelessness?\n\nThis looks like an imaginery thing. Just in fictions!
1121840
Time cannot exist without space.\nTime is something man uses to measure change.\nFor change to take place, there must be somewhere for the change to happen.\nWe need space (no pun intended) for something to exist and to happen.\nSpace is where all things exist.\nWithour space, there would be nothing, and there would be no change, resulting in no time.
396539
Time wasn't invented, at least by humans. It was recognized, and there's a big difference. Because time wasn't invented, we don't know a lot of why and how it operates, or even if it exists at all. There is a school of thought that time is little more than a rationalization perpetuated to explain the differences in what we remember and what *is* now.
306592
Time is cyclic.\nThings are born, they age, they die, they are returned to the earth, they nourish the soil, life begins again.\nTalking backward couldn't happen since that moment in time has already passed.\nThat's the paradox proposed in time travel: If you went back in time, then the moment that led up to you traveling back in time would never happen.\nIn closing, time is real...measuring time is a man-made concept.\n(See, answers can be cyclic, too)
1104806
The concept of time is that it does not exsist. Time is on earth to put events in a cronological form. In the Universe or 'heaven' time is not a concept. Life outside of earth and our bodies has not end
752397
I would go to the distant future and speak with people who perhaps allready have the time machine so I could understand how to use it carefully without disrupting the continuum. I would be careful on going to the future to get reports on sports games and the stock market because each future you visit is only one particular future, and with each passing second it creates a completely differrent future. I also might take christians and other religeous fanatics to the far distant past to prove to them that evolution occured once and for all and their bible thumping is basicaly meaningless. However this could also be dangerous because any foreign disease on us, or exhaled by us that was exposed to the primordial world could totaly change what we know to be current history. Every invention created by us happens very carefully, we make nothing before we are ready. If (in total speculation) a future time traveller visited the past he would have all precautions accounted for, such as disease, mistakes, and keeping a low profile. In our century we have no such precautions. So if I ever did get a hold of a time machine, I would return it to whoever it came from. Another problem with using a time machine to change the past or "the grandfather" paradox is Richard Feynmans theory of "a particle will take every possible path in space time" meaning if I went back and changed a past, I would change the past in a totaly differrent time frame then the temporal continuum I am used to, so when I returned everything would be the same. However I would be still messing with the universe. Theirfore if I ever found a empty time machine I would indeed leave it alone, or return it to the big temporal lost and found. We are not ready for such technology, and probaly wont be for a long time.
290582
If time was a loop (Stephen Hawking's worm hole theory) Yes in a gazillion years (you might live that long, Yeah right) we would be in the same spot in time. But the down side is that we would pass through a wormhole completely disintegrating everything.
450361
No - Nothing has been destroyed. Just changed in form.\nThe planet will be here for a long time to come.\nThat is if time actuallly exists........\nPeople will adapt to changes, as will lots of animals, trees, insects, plants, fish etc\n\nIs this bothering you - cos your lifespan is 120 years tops?\nFu@k the enviroment, enjoy yourself a bit and stop worrying. Let your kids do all the worrying.
1152196
I think it could be possible. Even though some people ask why someone doesn't come back and tell us this, if you came back in time and told everyone this, how would you know what effect it would have? What would probably happen it that they when it's invented, nobody will be able to use it, and then it might as well not exsist. There's irony for you.
1071464
Who actually said that theres an 'end' to time itself?  Theoretically, who says that time hasnt ended before, and whos time are asking about, ours or someone else's? These are factors that have to be considered throughout the course of that which is the universe. Now, some scientists claim that another "Big Bang", much like the one that some believe formed the universe in the first place, will happen again and completely wipe the board clean.  The question you should be asking yourself is this:  If 'Big Bangs' keep, well um, banging, then who says that will end?  What if it already has happened several times, yet in your lifetime, you believe that youre still forging the original trail?  The problem with this question is that we, as stupid friggin humans, are basically incapable of having any sense of time. We live our and die, if we're lucky. But we dont know if another big bang will happen tomorrow at which point everything goes back to zero, history repeats itself and none of us are the wiser. Its a lot to think about, but as a simple answer to your question which is: 'When is the end of time?", I believe that the simple answer is "never".\n\n-J.