Should criminal charges be brought against Bush...?
953602
to the hague and take his minions with him.
438159
An amusing thought but I think the truth is far more sinister. This is GOP hubris at its zenith. They think they're literally above the law and can do as they please. The vile bush administration is beyond corrupt; they're evil, arrogant and mad with power. Notwithstanding an almost nonexistent brain, bush thinks himself a god who can do no wrong and who needn't follow his own bloody rules (this leak issue being the latest such example). It's a disgrace, just as it was a national disgrace that these hateful people were ever put in power in the first place. The damage they've inflicted upon this country will endure for more years than I care to count. Impeachment would be the very least punishment he and his criminal cohorts warrant. I'd be satisfied with nothing short of long-term imprisonment, which of course means I'll not be satisfied at all. None of these scoundrels will ever be properly punished, bush least of all. It's a joke.
164651
it depends if the DA has decided to press charges.  If so..then yes.  If not, I am assuming this is why you were released.
964370
Hmmmm.....tough to say because the people whom we want to bring charges against are the law makers themselves. There is a strong reason for putting up charges agains Bush and Blair in the Internation Criminal Court (some people didn't know the full form here) or Cour internationale de Justice/ International court of jusitce. Both these two have waged an illegal war (as per the United Nations charter on going to conflict and war) and both have violated some serious international laws\n\nIn UK some people already tried to bring charges against Blair.\n\nBut here we are talking about fighting against big countries and powerful people...every country has done some or the other wrong thing...China's government is blamed for gross Human Rights abuses, Indian government for supporting the terrorist organizations like LTTE in Sri Lanka and Maoist terrorists in Nepal and many others in South Asia...but hmmm...\n\nWe don't live in a perfect world and people can run away from the crime as long as they have the power and occupy the places that matter.
690232
Unfortunately in the eyes of the law its murder....but it should be justifiable,Just as Bush justifies every law hes broken, every lie hes told to turn it around and say its it our countries best interest... I should also add its justifed when your property or life depends on it.  That goes for many other circumstances well apart from the borders of this country.
896096
Absolutely.  He obviously has worked well within his rights as our president and those threatening various form of legal harassment are attempting to undercut our method of democracy.  I would not put up with that.\n\nNeither would most people.\n\nIf you don't like the decisions Bush is making, than vote against the party in the next election.  But, getting around our representational system with phony charges?  That kind of thing could easily lead to civil war.
486497
jail, long sentance, a*s rape buy a guy named bubba twinkles.\n\nnothing will happen to bush, short of a mob of veterans tearing him to shreds....doubt thatll happen either.
842601
True, Bush has not committed any crimes. Libs are steaming mad that they have been out of power so long. They're also mad that Bush accomplished what they wanted to do but did not: topple Saddam.
634066
Of course! The criminal administration mantra of "do as I say and not as I do", and if you do, then you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. If I (Bush) do it, it's all part of the war on terror. I want some of what Bush and his criminal administration are smoking.
927999
Isn't it always a good idea to put self-admitted criminals on trial?\n\nDoes the US stand to gain anything by allowing someone to admit to breaking the law, and then not even put them on trial because they claim (without any legal support) that their position entitles them to break the law at will?\n\nIf Bush is put on trial (impeached = trial) and found not guilty, so be it. But not even putting him on trial sends the wrong message. It tells the world that the US doesn't care about the rule of law, and that we allow those in power to break the law at will.\n\nHardly a justification for the US claim to depose other dictators.
1172591
You bet, nobody should be above the law, if it is ok for Bush to break the law then it is ok for all of us. He needs to be reigned in someway in his last two years to keep him from doing any more damage to the constitution or the country.
510588
That is a perfect sentence for a war criminal, but George Bush should have to face the United Nations for war crimes as well.
375683
This question can't really be answered. My opinion is that he will not be indicted. If he is, Bush will pardon him.
296369
He really should be arrested and tried in a world court to accept responsibility for the laws that he has broken during his presidency. Not to mention the dirty deals that he has done dirt cheap.
693678
It would depend on the individual case. If the police and/or prosecution had planted evidence or hid evidence that would have proved someones innocence, then deliberately and knowingly prosecuted an innocent man, then yes, under those circumstances I feel both criminal and civil charges should be brought against the "People". But unfortunately our law system is not perfect and even when everything is done by the book, sometimes an innocent person is found guilty of a crime that they did not commit. In those cases you cannot blame the prosecution or law enforcement, and it would be unfair to penalize them.
703052
Ummm... if you've been watching the news he has all ready been prosecuted. He is going to be hung. \n\nShould he be prosecuted for killing 148 people who supposedly tried to assasinate him? I think it depends if the people actually tried to assasinate him.\n\nAnd that is just one of the crimes he has commited. \n\nHow ignorant of people to blame Bush for everything! If you haven't done you're research don't make generalizing comments. Saddam is being judged by an Iraqi Court, not an American one.
481068
Umm...Saddam did some really bad things during his reign as ruler of Iraq. Whether Bush is a criminal or not will be determined by history.