why do most people hate Hillary? just wondering?
966787
She was just elected with 67% of the vote.  What do you mean hate?  You are misinformed.  Why do Republicans hate her, would be more appropriate.  That answer would be, because she threatens their power.
166679
Please, give me some quotes from any Democratic Party leader that encourages people to hate their country.  Even a single quote.\n\nAs for the distrust - with none of the recent presidential administrations (of either party) has done much to convince me that they're worthy of my trust.  If you're going to put blind faith in whatever government you have, then why do you care which party is in power at all?\n\nEdit (in response to your addition): again - give me one quote from a Dem party leader saying any of the things you mention.
508208
Hillary Clinton is the wife of the previous president, Mr. Bill Clinton. She will not win the next presidency, or any other. Republicans cannot stand her, (despite her many attempts to please them), nor can anti-war democrats.\n\nThe only ones wishing Hillary would win are feminists. They want to believe she is a strong, intelligent woman capable of running the nation, (even in this time of war). However, they do not reallize she is not strong. She is not intelligent. She is merely the pawn of the men running the democratic party. Who are using her solely to win the hearts of feminists.
1072532
Hate and personal attacks are not political they are hate and personal attacks.\n\nshe uses them to sell books nothing political about that.\n\nHer defense is that the people she attacked backed Kerry which is their right. \n\nNo one has the right  attack like that\n\nGood Luck and God Bless!!
495661
While I'll simply say that I agree with "trinitytough" on the specific reasons, I want to address everyone that says conservatives hate Hillary just because she is a strong woman.\nWell, what about Condi Rice!?!  Rumors are that she'll be one of the major republican candidates in 2008, AND some opinions in the media describe her as one of the most powerful women in the world.  Hmmmmm... seems like conservatives should hate her even more than Hillary, and yet, many conservatives would LOVE to vote for Rice (or any of a half dozen other prominent conservative political women).  \n\nJust think if she were elected Pres... the first black AND the first woman president and *GASP* she's a REPUBLICAN!?!  What on earth will the liberals do when they can't call conservatives male chauvinistic, racists!?!  In their desperation they'll probably flip-flop and say that conservatives are trying to repress the poor, neglected white male...
536949
Hillary is nothing more than a pawn for the democrats. Used to win the hearts of feminists. She is not strong, not tough, just a pawn of the men using her.
1059441
Wow a capable, intelligent female who has make a great Senator. You think she's intimidated some people? Strong females always have dislike directed at them. Usually by males and females who couldn't do the job she does. People said the same about Clare Booth Luce, Eleanor Roosevelt etc. A shame isn't it???
962582
There is alot of hatred and most stems from the Gore/Bush campaign.They made a premature call of the election and tried to discredit our military votes by taking it to court to have them thrown out of the count because they were a few days late coming in from overseas.Instead of debating an issue its easier for them to name call.Ie,they called our president Hitler,called conservatives Nazi's and call our troops terrorists..,thank you howard dean,yet they wonder why President Bush doesnt want to work with them?It doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure that one out.
20045
Hate is a strong term didn't really care for him as a President and was the main reason I didn't go into the military (now I'm too old to go).\n\nThe way he botched Samalia, Ruth Bader Ginsburg (everyone should be mad about the current view of Imminate Domain no matter what party you belong to), The fact we were offered Ossama three times and Clinton turned them down, suborning purgery, purgery, the fact he was a marxist, ramsey clarck, joceylene elders, janet reno, Waco, Ruby Ridge, clinon's ban on assault weapons, which they weren't assault weapons because an assault weapon is fully-automatic, not semiautomatic, marxist style medicine, the fact he couldn't stay loyal to his wife, Sandy Burger,Bosnia,not doing anything about the first attack on the World trade Center, not doing anything about the attack on the USS Cole, he is as much a media hog as McCaine, not doing anything about illegal immigration (one of the problems I have with Bush).
1010859
Clinton, and not because I hate Bush, but because\n\n1.The economy was better under Clinton\n2.There was less fear/actual terrorist attacks\n3.The country was fairly united\n4.Less division between parties\n5.Better education plan without No Child Left Behind\n6.Working on healthcare problems vs. working on changing the Consitiution\n7.Scandals had to do with sex, not money theft, conspiracy, and wiretapping...\n\nClinton wins, the only place people really hate him for is the affair and that was his private business, in reality almost all Presidents have affairs...
660552
No bud, you're not the only one at all. And shy of these few liberal anti-social hippies on the net who spew their hatred for the president and other authority figures, because they don't want any accountability, like the whiney crybabies that they are, most normal, sane and rational americans feel the same way. Most liberal women aren't that attractive. Just look at hillary, rosie o'donnell, joy behar for example. All lesbians by the way. \n\nThat's right liberals. you're beloved anti-christ hillary has been seen with other lesbian women at night clubs in jew york shi**y, cavorting and making out with other dikes behind closed doors, while not so slick willie was philandering as usual. Says something about a party and its followers when committing adultery against your spouse in the sacred oval office no less has no shock and outrage from the liberals at large. \n\nYou liberals that preach compassion and claim to have so much, are the same people that have been and would be ready on a moments notice to crucify a conservative if they breath in your direction the wrong way. They're angry cause they're losers and they know it, and they like most liberals have upper contempt for truth, accountability and pro-american behavior, because they seek to block all three. But just like the purity of the blazing sun, you can't run or hide from it forever.
823391
I really like President Bush. I don't agree with all of his decisions, but I think he is a wise, Godly man who is a good leader. People claim that he is an awful president, but no one ever likes the president. People had problems with Clinton and every president before him. I am sure if some of these people who criticize Bush would have people that didn't like them if they ran the country. Electing a president is more or less electing the person who will get the blame. Running the most powerful nation in the world can't be a day at the beach....
989020
I don't hate the man, but I do understand why many people do not like him.  Mostly it is an honest issue.  He's a horribly untrustable person.  Almost everything he said he would do he didn't, and almost everything he said he wouldn't do he did.  Just look at the funding for church based initiatives. He promised lots of money and has yet to give a single penny to any of their causes.  Clinton gave about 15 million to church based initiatives, Bush Sr. about 10 million.  And it's not like he wouldn't have had support for it - the whole House and Senate is majority Republican.\n\nThen there is the war built on bad intelligence, the fact that he stayed on vacation for 3 extra days during a hurricane, hasn't caught Osama Bin Laden, has spent more money the a drunk Ted Kennnedy in Vegas with a fist full of government bonds, said he wasn't doing domestic wiretaps....\n\nThere is quite a lot of reasons to really dislike this president and I'm afraid that history will not be kind to him.  Bush is my president, but he is not a good president.
1174650
With so may reasons to despise Clinton where do I start?\n\nFirst, it's not the fact that he "had a couple of girlfriends." This would be fine were he single. Unfortunately Bill was married and had a child which means he is an adulterer. There goes his integrity. Next, Clinton lied while under oath while being questins about the Whitewater dealings and his relationship with Lewinsky. He also acted to obstruct justice. There goes more integrity and honesty.\n\nFor the record, Bill should have told Ken Starr to get bent when he was asked about Lewinsky. Monica had nothing to do with Whitewater.\n\nAfter that comes the supposed "budget surplus" that the US had under Bill. We had that "surplus" becuase Bill simply gutted the Military's and the Intelligence Community's budget so they had tons more to spend on their social programs such as welfare.\n\nOf course, the fact that the Intelligence Communities no longer had the proper funding they needed had no had in their failure to detect and prevent the September 11th attacks I'm sure. \n\nWhat also aided the attacks were the laws which Bill signed into law which greatly restricted the flow of information between the FBI, CIA, NSA and other state and federal law enforcement agencies.\n\nNext was the fact that Clinton authorized the sale of ballistic missille technology to the Chinese which allowed them to go from a no-threat nation to a first-strike capability nation and now, suddenly North Korea is also developing their missille technology in leaps and bounds.\n\nFurther is how BIll wholly deplored the military, evidenced by his cutting their budgeting, yet sending them on every single peacekeeping operation possible. Worst of all of all of these was Operation Restore Hope and the Battle of Mogadishu in1993. \n\nOperation Restore Hope was an utter failure on a number of levels. This was the first time that US troops were wholly under the command of a UN entity. In previous peacekeeping missions the US called the shots. Not so here. Also, Clinton refused to authroize the armor unit and C-130 Spectre gunships that would normally provide support for our troops. Also, Clinton refused the troops the authority to conduct night-time raids where our superior technology would give our soldiers an significant advantage.\n\nOur soldiers were a few thousad in a city of hundreds of thousands. Running night-time operations, armor and air support were critical and Clinton wholly ignored the recommendations of his military leaders and those in Somolia time and again. Task Force Ranger is specially trained, equipped and deployed to run night-time missions and Clinton simply used them as cannon fodder.\n\nOn Oct 3-4th the US forces attempted to capture a local warlord named Mohamed Farrah Aidid. After the battle in which 19 US soldiers dies and scores more wounded Clinton decided to pull the US forces due to negative polls numbers.\n\nThis lead to the impression that the US would back down after a loss.\n\nThen there were a staggering number of terrorist attacks against US interests during Clinton reign.\n\nThe USS Cole.\nThe Khobar Towers\nUS Embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya\nFirst attack on the World Trade Center\n\nIn response to the Embassy bombing Clinton destroyed an aspiriin factory.\n\nWow.  \n\n"President Bill Clinton announced the attacks in a TV address, saying the target was terror. Some, however, saw this as a way of attracting attention away from the Lewinsky scandal. On August 17, three days prior to the missile strike, President Clinton admitted in a nationally televised address that he had an inappropriate relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. This address followed President Clinton's grand jury testimony earlier that day (see Wag the Dog)."\nQuote from the last link provided.\n\nIt's also important to note that every claim that the left makes against Bush re the war in Iraq Clinton did as well.\n\nT
502391
I can't stand her!  I think she was the brains behind the Clinton presidency... but I just can't respect a woman who doesn't respect herself (if she did she would have left Bill Clinton a long, long time ago--but she just allows him to keep having affairs).  It'll be a sad day if she's elected the first female president--that is not what young girls should be aspiring to be like.
108112
Any candidate that the uber-liberal, extremist, conspiracy theorists whack-jobs would support, has to have something wrong with them.\n\nSpecifically with Hillary, she is an extreme leftist who does not even have the guts to publically say it in her words. She purposely tries to mask it in an attempt to "fool" the middle of the road people and the moderates on both sides. Luckily for most of us that are moderates, we are smart enough to see through it.\n\nHillary has a wide spread socialist agenda (and no I do not mean socialist as in the way the USSR was being run). She is a big proponent of big government, the government putting better use to taxpayer's earned money, and handouts to the lazy at the expense of those who work for their living. I can never side with this. I also will never side with any candidate that thinks the US government is some form of huge HMO.\n\nWhat has been forgotten by many Dems since the hippie generation, is that ultimately individuals are responsible for themselves. The federal government was never intended to be, nor should it be, responsible for the success or failure of an individual. Each individual must live with the consequences of the choices they make. If they want to be lazy and not try, then it is their choice to work a crap job for crap pay. If they refuse to use the opportunities such as the military as a job option to get a leg up, then why should they be GIVEN a handout by welfare? \n\nPersonal welfare has to be put back on the individual. Any candidate that goes in the opposite direction will most likely NEVER get my vote. And Hillary fits that bill.
366922
It's crazy... liberals have really gotten off on the wrong foot. Just really out of touch with society in general. I think sometimes they even go as far as being a taitor with some of the things they say. \n\nLet's not forget that Bush is fixing what our last president DIDN'T DO. And since he's fixing the mess, liberals hate him because their president didn't do anything except sit on the .com boom and jack up taxes. \n\n(Oh forgot to say that Clinton was offered bin Laden on 3 seperate occasions. He didn't nab him)\n\n(Oh forgot to say that Clinton didn't even visit the first WTC bombing site where 6 died and over 1,000 were injured. Now that's sympathy)