is a club libel for members property even if it has sign,s up to say it does not accept responsibility?
967493
The display of a disclaimer notice of this kind in respect of injury, damage or loss to any person or property whilst on the premises or making use of the premises, may not have the effect of avoiding liability. This is because under sections 2(1) and 2(2) of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977:\n\n"2(1) A person cannot by reference to any contract term or to a notice given to persons generally or to particular persons exclude or restrict his liability for death or personal injury resulting from negligence.\n\n2(2) In the case of other loss or damage, a person cannot so exclude or restrict his liability for negligence except in so far as the term or notice satisfies the requirement of reasonableness."
86050
Try going to your local lawschool/lawlibrary.  They may have forms for pro se (do it yourself) patrons.  Sounds like a joint tenancy with the right of survivorship.\n\nOf course, if you want to be on the safe side - you should get an attorney to handle it.  The cost may outweigh the potential problems that can pop up if the deed is improperly executed.
212492
hopefully your association is contracting with a professionial mangagment company. If it is a volunteer board, they still have responsibilities to the owners. Read your by-laws. You got a copy when you bought the property. If you need another copy, they are filed at the county courthouse. They can find them just by using your address. \n\nLeigh M\nPortland, Oregon\nhttp://www.LeighMaynard.com
517383
No. However, you are not responsible for the upkeep. Tell your landlady that you will no longer be held liable.
266160
Take your contract to a lawyer and look for an opt out.  Homeowner associations are notoriously corrupt.  For instance they can force a sale of property by claiming they never got your money and then their friend buys it up at a forclosure auction that isn't advertised.
787522
Yes, but it might be difficult to prove. It is called...i think slander or public defaming or something like that. Despite this, proof of the action(s) might be very difficult to prove, and the cost of the suit might not be reasonable.
132599
You have the question I have been looking for, the perfect question right up my ally.  \nI do reserve studies and budgeting for condo/ HOA’s for part of my job.  As the last poster mentioned, check your CC&R’s for any thing you can find.  Second, get your hands on a copy of the most recent reserve study or budget.  This document will usually have a line item for deck repair or replacement.  If it doesn’t you may not be out of luck just yet.  Argue that most association include this type of repairs w/ those of the association because water damage or penetration in a failing deck could result in damage to other units (under you) or to the structure itself (their responsibility).  The only place I’ve seen an association flat out refuse to pay for fixing/repairing a deck is when the damage to the deck has been caused by the actions of the homeowner.\n\nConsider this; if a deck fails and someone falls though it, landing on the association’s common area and it’s the sudden stop on their ground that injures them, who’s paying for it?
505673
The owner is responsible but their is negligence on both parts.
616428
If you are in any doubt re a financial company's standing or details you can check with the Ombudsman at the web site below.\n\nHope this helps
783566
Alright, you will need to go to the bank and talk to someone and let them know what happened and then ask them if they would please deny the charge to the lounge. Go to the lounge speak to a manager and tell them what happened because they assumed something.And tell them that they are legally responsible for all the charges from the bank and from anyone who recieved and NSF. Pay them cash for the drink that you bought . If you have a decent bank they should work with you on this. I had a very similar thing happen to me as well. It is a pain in the behind but if you want it fixed you have to do it.
670754
Well that depends.  Assuming you are in NYC (I am citing here because there are tons of case laws, the rules are reasonably refined), generally the city is NOT liable unless someone notifies the city a dangerous condition in writing prior to the injury. And perhaps this is the case everywhere in the US cities.\n\nAn exception to this notice requirement has been litigated based on a theory that the danger was apparent to the city that the city did not need the notice to realize such existence of dangerous condition.   HOWEVER, the recent case ruled that only such an exception applies to the case where the city itself made such a dangerous condition, i.e., city constructions ...
563308
If it is a distorted or false information that is intentionally put out to negatively effect someone's reputation, you are liable for...\n\nIn English and American law, and systems based on them, libel and slander are two forms of defamation (or defamation of character), the tort or delict of publishing (to a third party) a false statement that negatively affects someone's reputation.\n\n"Defamation" is the general term used internationally, and is used in this article where it is not necessary to distinguish between "libel" and "slander". Libel is defamation that can be seen, such as in writing, printing, effigy, a movie, or a statue. Slander is any defamation that is spoken and heard.
1040893
Yes they can BUT be aware that once something is minuted and recorded, it cant be changed by other members to reflect the issue / themselves in a different light. The minutes will be heard at the next club meeting, after apologies received. The members will have a chance at this point to comment on the contents of the previous minutes, for example give the group an update on a point raised previously, or alert members present to spelling mistakes.
621393
It depends....Like many other enterprises, your business may pay club dues to one or several types of organizations. These dues may or may not be deductible, depending on the type of organization and its purpose. \n\nYour business generally cannot deduct dues paid to a club organized for business, pleasure, recreation or other social purposes. This disallowance rule takes in country clubs, golf clubs, business luncheon clubs, athletic clubs, and even airline and hotel clubs. However, you can deduct 50% of the cost of otherwise allowable business entertainment at a club, even if the dues you pay to the club are nondeductible. For example, if you have dinner with a client at your country club after a substantial and bona fide business discussion, 50% of the cost of the dinner is deductible as a business expense. \n\nThe club-dues disallowance rule generally doesn't affect dues paid to professional organizations, including bar associations and medical associations, or civic or public-service-type organizations such as the Lions, Kiwanis or Rotary clubs. The dues paid to local business leagues, chambers of commerce and boards of trade also aren't affected. However, an organization isn't exempt from the disallowance rule if its principal purpose is to provide entertainment facilities to its members, or to conduct entertainment activities for them. \n\nFinally, keep in mind that even if the general club-dues disallowance rule doesn't apply, there is no deduction for dues unless you can show that the amount you pay is an ordinary and necessary business expense.
907065
People are funny. You never know who might sue. it sucks to say that about friends, but that's just the way it is. Draft a waiver, get a alwyer to look it over and amend it if needed. They probably won't mind signing, but don't be surprised if somebody gets offended. If they do, don't invite them back. We've been playing on my property since 1990 and I've never asked them to sign a waiver. We've had a couple twisted ankles and a run in with a barb-wire fence, but no one has ever tried to sue. But, it never hurts to protect yourself.
815438
It is illegal to MAKE a copy, regardless if you sell it or not.\nThe section is:\nUSC 17 106-1.\n[1]
210568
If the alleged infringer argues that the brand belongs to them, they would not assert fair use, they would argue that the brand belongs to them.\n\nIf the alleged infringer files a registration and is genuinely unaware that another is using the same mark, there is no way he can disclose that another is using the mark.  However, the alleged infringer has a duty to investigate whether another is using the mark.  If he did not, he would simply be denied use of the mark; he can appeal if he feels the denial is in error.\n\nRegardless, either user will need to show that the mark is distinctive enough to be registered; if there is a disagreement over the mark, the parties will have to fight it out (i.e. prove that it is a unique mark and prove who is entitled to use the mark).