Assuming USC beats UCLA and Florida beats Arkansas....?
959818
I'm a huge Florida fan so I am biased. Just to get that out of the way.\n\nI strongly believe Florida deserves more respect then they get, but I think this year is all about the BIG 10. The truth of the matter is the SEC is PACKED full of talent, and the teams there beat the crap out of each other. So rarely does any one team make it out of the division without some sort of blemish.\n\nHow a person can say Florida looked anything but great this past Saturday is beyond me.  Just look at Florida States rushing yards! Also understand Florida State is 10th in the nation for defense. Take that into account and that Florida is at FL ST., then take away two key players to their offense(Wynn & Harvin). Show me another team that could play without their two KEY players and win. OSU w/out Troy Smith? Ark w/out McFadden? USC w/out Booty and Jarrett? All of them wouldn't last against Florida State with out their KEY players.\n\nI had posted a question earlier titled "BCS a bunch of crock?" and it touches on the whole USC thing, and it's pretty sad and upsetting when you look at it.
939086
I think it would be nice to see it but unless USC falls to notredame tonight then they still may end up losing the #2 spot.  Since Michigan has already got to play OSU the rematch wouldnt be as anticipated though.
732955
at Arkansas L 24-23 \nat Florida L 28-13 \nat Tennessee L 16-13 \nMiss. State L 24-16 \nat LSU L 28-14
915615
I think it will be relatively spread this weekend. The Florida run defense is STIFF and McFadden will have to earn every yard he gets. But that being said, the Florida secondary is good, but isnt stellar. They'll leave the short passes open and I think this is the week where you try an HB toss pass with McFadden to shake things up a bit. \n\nIf Arkansas beats Florida, I can see them vaulting over Boise St. and Wisconsin in the BCS standings.
858604
Ohio State will be left standing...  ...but...\n\nMichigan, if they get another shot at Ohio State, otherwise Ohio State.  I think they are indeed the best and second best teams.  I say to those that say USC, you shouldn’t have lost to Oregon State, and those that say Florida, you shouldn’t have lost to Auburn.  You have to offer some respect to Michigan for losing to the #1 team in the country, on their home field by only 3 points.  Considering how they fought back, I think they’d beat the Buckeyes on a neutral field.\n\nHowever, I think it will end up being Ohio State, because after USC wins out, I think it will be fresh in people’s heads and they’ll be #2.  If Florida or Arkansas finish with one loss, I know it was the first game of the season, but I’m a firm believer of the transitive property, and the fact that USC beat Arkansas (badly) gives the nod to USC over Arkansas or anyone from the SEC.  I don’t buy the SEC media problem that Jerry referenced.  If there was an undefeated team coming out of the SEC this year, they’d be #1 or #2, and no one would argue it.  If Notre Dame is to knock off USC, then I’ll give the nod to Florida, if they win out.  If it’s Arkansas, I'd give the nod to ND due to that transitive property, again.  I feel strongly that anyone with 2 losses can’t even be considered.  Sorry LSU fans.\n\nSo here’s the way I see it and a BCS scenario with results.  Let’s see what happens.\nOSU is in, and USC can control its own destiny.  Florida, Michigan, & Notre Dame are other possibilities, but need some help.  Everyone else is screwed.  Sorry Arkansas & Wisconsin (which is my team)\n\nSo, if OSU beats USC for the national championship…\n…BCS #2: Michigan over Florida (finish with one loss going in)…\n…BCS #3: Texas over Notre Dame (two losses each going in)…\n…BCS #4: West Virginia over Georgia Tech …\nLeaving Wisconsin and Arkansas left out.  Yikes, might they play each other then.  To appease the SEC argument, we’ll say Arkansas wins that game, and then rank them:\n#1 OSU, #2 Michigan, #3 USC, #4 Texas, #5 Florida, #6 Arkansas, #7 West Viginia…\n\nRight or Wrong, it makes for a fun debate.\nOn Wisconsin!!!
813944
Even if USC loses to UCLA,  Michigan should get another shot at Ohio State because they are a better team than Florida , but if everything plays out like it should Florida might play Michigan in a Bowl Game and Florida will get spanked !!! Oh Well !! \n\n GO BUCKEYES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
819124
Yes, they are. \n\nFlorida or Arkansas will go to the Sugar as the SEC champ (automatic bid). If Florida loses the SEC, they'll end up in the Orange Bowl, accepting the at-large selection (good for recruiting). If Arkansas loses, the Rose wouldn't take them becasue they won't travel well, and they're a 2 loss team that got whipped by USC and recently lost to LSU; Ark. would end up in the Cotton. \n\nLSU has a strong following, and next best Pac 10 team has 3 losses and is ranked 18th in the BCS (Cal), so no way the Rose touches them. Since the Rose Bowl has first choice of the teams that play in a BCS game (there are no conference requirements as some have posted) a #5 LSU seems like a strong candidate.
897566
If USC wins against Notre Dame, they will pass Michigan and get the nod.  OSU 56, USC 34.\nIf Notre Dame beats USC, then Michigan will play OSU.  Mich 35, OSU 28.\n\nFlorida has an outside chance, but I don't think they will beat Arkansas.
929574
Yes it would be great, and I think the Trojans aren't as good as the Wolverinenes. I still think they should rematch. Plus, it would be an outstanding game.
699376
Honestly they should but I doubt it would happen. Hopefully UCLA beats them which I think will end up happening.  I am sick of people saying that Florida plays nobody. 1st of all how in the hell can you be an SEC team period and not play anybody, that is just  stupid to even make that statement. Take a look at Florida's Schedules\n\n  Southern Miss W 34-7 \n  Sat, Sep 9 UCF W 42-0  \n  Sat, Sep 16 at (13) Tennessee W 21-20  \n  Sat, Sep 23 Kentucky W 26-7  \n  Sat, Sep 30 Alabama W 28-13  \n  Sat, Oct 7 (9) LSU W 23-10  \n  Sat, Oct 14 at (11) Auburn L 17-27  \n  Sat, Oct 28 Georgia W 21-14  \n  Sat, Nov 4 at Vanderbilt W 25-19   \n  Sat, Nov 11 South Carolina W 17-16  \n  Sat, Nov 18 Western Carolina W 62-0  \n  Sat, Nov 25 at Florida State W 21-14    \n  Sat, Dec 2 (8) Arkansas \n\nThere are 5 ranked teams in the SEC including Florida and Florida would have played all of them after DEC.2 vs. Arkansas\n\nThere are about 8-9 teams that are most likely gonna go to a bowl game depending on if Alabama goes or not.  And if you look at several of the unranked teams in the SEC they have winning records they just got crushed in conference play because the SEC is a tough conference. You have to bring your A game every night or you will lose no matter what team you are. There are 8 teams with winning records and 1 at .500: The conference is so good they cancel each other out. For example georgia is not ranked but they beat Auburn who is ranked #11. Look at the records of the Bowl elgible teams!\n\n SEC EAST\n Florida (4)  7-1  11-1  \n Tennessee (17)  5-3  9-3  \n Georgia  4-4  8-4  \n Kentucky  4-4  7-5  \n South Carolina  3-5  7-5 \n \n SEC WEST\n Arkansas (8)  7-1  10-2  \n LSU (5)  6-2  10-2  \n Auburn (11)  6-2  10-2  \n Alabama  2-6  6-6 \n\nTennessee is #17 and their only losses came against ranked teams in the SEC. And they barely beat Kentuck (17-12) who is not ranked but happens to be in the SEC as well.\n\nSame thing with LSU. They are ranked #5 and their only 2 losses have been both against SEC ranked teams.\n\nLook at South Carolina who is not ranked. All their losses came against SEC teams. Other than the 18-0 loss to Georgia(who is in the SEC and is not ranked) they lossed to Auburn, Tennessee,Arkansas, and Florida(Who are all ranked) by a combined margin of 21 poitns wich is an average of about 5 points. (Less than a TD) This includes a one point loss to #4 Florida. I can go on and on and give you examples of how tough this conference is. You can tell that they acknowledge how tough it is because they have LSU #5 and they have two losses.(To ranked SEC teams) They just are not taking that into consideration with florida because they want to see USC back for the 4th str8 time. Lets Examine USC schedule since people think Florida has not played anybody! Lets see how much more brutal USC's schedule is that Florida if at all.\n\n Sat, Sep 2 at Arkansas W 50-14\n  Sat, Sep 16 (19) Nebraska W 28-10 \n  Sat, Sep 23 at Arizona W 20-3  \n  Sat, Sep 30 at Washington State W 28-22  \n  Sat, Oct 7 Washington W 26-20  \n  Sat, Oct 14 Arizona State W 28-21  \n  Sat, Oct 28 at Oregon State L 31-33 \n  Sat, Nov 4 at Stanford W 42-0 \n  Sat, Nov 11 (21) Oregon W 35-10  \n  Sat, Nov 18 (17) California W 23-9 \n  Sat, Nov 25 (6) Notre Dame W 44-24  \n  Sat, Dec 2 at UCLA 4:30 pm  \n\n\nNow as you see USC did beat four rank teams.\nOregon, California, Notre Dame and Nebraska. They loss to an unranked team in their conference! Oregon state is not ranked. I am not saying they are not good their record is 6-3 in conference and 8-4 overall but the point is that they were never ranked this entire season. Cant say its timing because Florida lost the week before USC did. Now take a look at the PAC 10 (every team)\n                          \n\n                           C    (Overall)\n  \n USC (2)            7-1  10-1  \n California (21)  6-2  8-3  \n Oregon State   6-3  8-4  \n UCLA                4-4  6-5  \n Oregon             4-5  7-
805931
Oregon (I hope) USC (I think)
959529
I agree that USC could beat both Ohio State and Michigan.  For one thing, USC coach Pete Carroll has experience in big games and considering that Carroll is undefeated in November (this year and in years past) and that USC's defense is starting to come to life after having a hard time adjusting to the 3-4 defense from previous years' 4-3 defense, USC could handle just about any other team in the country.  I wouldn't say that USC would blow out Ohio State/Michigan, but I would say that USC could beat them.
513807
Quick note. I am a USC fan. I think they will do very well, but you have to take into consideration what happened a couple of weeks ago at the draft. This is a list of people that USC lost in the 2006 Draft Reggie Bush,Matt Leinart, Winston Justice,Taitusi Latui, LenDale White, Dominique Byrd, Fred Matua and David Kirtman. Ok lets see they lost there QB their top 2 running backs and their full back. They lost 3 of their 5 offensive lineman. Im sorry but i dont know how they are going to do it. and dont get me started with thier defense. I think UCLA is going to tank also. The team that i give a legit chance of winning the title is CAL because they have their spectacular runningback comming back(Marshon Lynch) this year and Joey Ayoob. But then thats just me
866371
I doubt it...I mean both teams probably deserve it...but with the way they rank teams...look what happened to West Virginia...#3....lost to #5 Louisville by misfortune...and drop to #10...that's a load of crap...USC lost to an unranked team and only fell to what...#8?
446060
UCLA should win, because of their defense but Florida has that too, UCLA has experience, but Florida has more talent.  It comes down to offense and free throws and Florida has a slight edge over UCLA.  Both teams were fortunate to get here, because despite the title of National Champion one of them will carry, neither of them are even in the Top 3 this year in my opinion.  But I say Florida upsets UCLA in the year of upsets and makes Vegas even richer!
400156
I believe the point spread was favoring Florida by 1.5 pts.  This meant that UCLA was the underdog by 1.5.  Instead FLorida blew them out.
813693
I understand what you're saying about\nUSC being ahead of FL in the BCS\nbut like someone else said.. the winning score\nisn't as impressive as they should be for UF.\nHowever, if USC wins out, their schedule\nwill really help them out.\n\nFL will make it to the nat title game if\nthe Ohio St vs Michigan game is a blowout win\nand if USC loses against Cal, ND, or UCLA.\n\nAs for someone arguing about Notre Dame,\nyes their loss was to Michigan but look at the\nteams they had a hard time beating...\nMichigan State and UCLA??\n\nNot to mention the whole 2nd\nhalf of their schedule this year\n(minus USC which is last)