Who was the governor of campania During the herculonious period ?
956174
I think you are getting a little mixed up with your question and you are not providing enough information to answer your question. Not sure what you mean by Herculonious period as no such period existed in Italy, unless you mean the city of Herculaneum, which was a part of Campania. The town itself was named after Hercules, but was covered in volcanic ash and lava, by Mount Vesuvius at the same time as Pompeii in 79AD. \n\nCampania is a region of Southern Italy, bordering on Lazio to the north-west, Molise to the north, Puglia to the north-east, Basilicata to the east, and the Tyrrhenian Sea to the west. The region covers 13,595 km² and has a population of 5.8 million.\n\nIf you require the history of Campania you will find it here.\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campania
543650
Charlemagne (742 or 747 – 28 January 814) (also Charles the Great[1]; from Latin, Carolus Magnus or Karolus Magnus), son of King Pippin the Short and Bertrada of Laon, was the king of the Franks from 768 to 814 and king of the Lombards from 774 to 814. He was crowned Imperator Augustus in Rome on Christmas Day, 800 by Pope Leo III and is therefore regarded as the founder of the Holy Roman Empire (as Charles I). Through military conquest and defence, he solidified and expanded his realm to cover most of Western Europe.Sometimes Charlemagne is described as the Father of Europe. His was the first truly imperial power in the West since the fall of Rome.
138342
He drowned.\n\nhttp://www.ordotempli.org/the_death_of_frederick_barbarossa_1190.htm
541021
1st coach(es)\n15.05.10 - 06.01.11\n236 days\nU. Meazza - Recalcati - Crivelli - Camper - Gama
1144247
For the case I would try Lexis Nexis.  \n\nHere is a bio on Mauro: http://www.historicist.com/mauro/bio.htm
231060
Classical antiquity period
676652
Caesar took horrible risk in his attempt to gain power.  When the high priest (pontifex maximus) died, Caesar stood for election to the post. He borrowed huge sums to bribe the voters. In 65 bc, he took his next step in the cursus honorum. He became aedile, he continued to run up his debts, putting on shows of unheard-of splendor. These included plays, public feasts, processions, and single combats between 320 pairs of gladiators. This made Caesar extremely popular with the masses, and at the height of his popularity he had the old statues of marius and the trophies of his victories gilded and set up again at the capitol, from which sulla had removed them. The large faction of marius, which had been dejected and leaderless without him, now began to see Caesar as their savior.\nCaesar became praetor in 62 bc, and shortly afterward he went out to govern the province of spain, where he fought a war against the native people. This war gave him his first experience of being a commander-in-chief, and a captured booty allowed him to path up his shattered finances. He returned to rome with only the highest office yet to win the consulship.\nCaesar served in spain during both his quaestorship and praetorship, but spain was just one of many roman provinces. in caesar’s lifetime, most of the lands surrounding the Mediterranean had been conquered, and by the time he died, this conquest was almost entirely completed.
541681
check out this site it might help\n\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rome
452798
These sites will help you to do your own homework.  If we do it for you, then you aren't learning anything.\n\nhttp://reference.aol.com/fast-facts/holidays/_a/fast-facts-about-the-ides-of-march/20060314093609990001\nhttp://heraklia.fws1.com/\nhttp://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/julius_ceasar.htm
585792
The Medici were possibly the richest family in Italy. In the 13th Century the family began to gain wealth. At the end of the thirteenth century, the family's wealth increased when one of the members of the family served as gonfalero (bearer of a high ceremonial office). \nIn the fourteenth century their wealth increased again. \n\nSavestro de Medici led people in revolt against the ciompi (small artistanate) and later he became so popular that he became defacto dictator of Florence. Then in 1383 his wealth decreased when he was banished. \n\nGiovanni Bicci de Medici regained family power by making the family the richest family in Italy, possibly Europe. The growth in political power also increased when he became gonfalero in 1421. \n\nGiovanni's son, Cosimo de Medici, was to be the real founder of the family's fortune. In 1434, Cosimo controlled the government in Florence. For the sixty years Cosimo ruled Florence but he had no official title. He ruled in the early 15th Century when he ran for office. He held office in Florence's highest magistry and at the same time he managed interests in banking, trade, and industry. Later on in a political battle with another powerful family called the Albizzi family, Cosimo lost and was banished. But since a lot of people supported him, he was recalled and the Albizzi family was banished in return.
18380
Italy is a state..not Province...!!\nWithin Italy there are many province!
279914
Caligula (kulig'yoolu) [key], A.D. 12–A.D. 41, Roman emperor (A.D. 37–A.D. 41); son of Germanicus Caesar and Agrippina the Elder. His real name was Caius Caesar Germanicus. As a small child, he wore military boots, whence his nickname [caligula=little boot]. On the death of Tiberius the army helped make Caligula emperor. Shortly afterward he became severely ill; it is widely believed that he was thereafter insane. He earned a reputation for ruthless and cruel autocracy, and torture and execution became the order of the day. He was responsible for serious disturbances among the Jews, and he nearly caused a rebellion in Palestine by attempting to erect a statue of himself in their temple. He was assassinated by a tribune of the Praetorian Guard and succeeded by Claudius I.
436868
yea alittle, hes considered one of the best tactitioners of all time. this is what made him GAYUS (emperor) when he came back to rome after conquering a war; his time as emperor (in those REPUBLIC days think of it like a presidential term) his term was about to be up. he didnt concede. so there was a civil war  , one side wanted to keep it as a REPUBLIC (meaning senators, emperor,emperor time length) which was mediated by pompeii a friend of julius caesar and julius caesor and the senator on his side/and the bought ones who wanted him to be DICTATOR for life and turn rome in2 an empire (dictator in that era was not looked as something denigrating.) but before this pompei was murdered in what now is Egypt trying to gather support there to defeat julius's army, he was double crossed by the very young king, pompei was decapitated. after this event a few people in the senate who wanted julius dead, and thought pompei could deliver on squashing julius's army with his own, planned his murder; he was murdered in march by casius and brutus, the latter being a son of one of his many mistresss'. his nephew octavius gathered enough political strength a few years after his uncles death, to become ruler. although he used another term and not EMPEROR.
1153829
Go to:\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elpidio_Quirino\n\nHere you will find all the info you need on him.
382865
Ciampi (for suckers)\nBerlusconi (for corrupts)\nMussolini (aah that was 70 years ago, sorry)
629231
CHARLES MARTEL [Charles Martel] [O.Fr.,=Charles the Hammer], 688?-741, Frankish ruler, illegitimate son of Pepin of Heristal and grandfather of Charlemagne. After the death of his father (714) he seized power in Austrasia from Pepin's widow, who was ruling as regent for her grandsons, and became mayor of the palace. He subsequently subdued the W Frankish kingdom of Neustria and began the reconquest of Burgundy, Aquitaine, and Provence. Charles Martel defeated the Spanish Muslims at the battle of Tours (732-33) and began the military campaigns that reestablished the Franks as the rulers of Gaul. Although he never assumed the title of king, he divided the Frankish lands, like a king, between his sons Pepin the Short and Carloman\n\n----------------------------------------------------\n\n\nName: Charles Martel \nBirth Date: c. 690 \nDeath Date: October 22, 741 \nNationality: Frankish \nGender: Male \nOccupations: ruler \n\n--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nCharles Martel Biography\n\nThe Frankish ruler Charles Martel (ca. 690-741) reestablished central authority in Francia and constructed a power base on which the Carolingian monarchs founded their empire.\n\nTo understand the historical importance of Charles Martel ("the Hammer"), it is necessary to appreciate the situation of the last Merovingian kings of Francia and to understand what historians generally refer to as the crisis of the mid-8th century, namely, the expansion of Islam and the sealing off of the Mediterranean. After the reign of Dagobert I (629-639) the Merovingian royal house was weakened by the fact that none of the later kings survived until manhood. Therefore in the 7th century the real power of government was exercised by the mayors of the palace. These officials controlled the royal treasury, dispersed patronage, and granted land and privileges in the name of the king.\n\nThe Merovingian kingdom in Gaul comprised two major subkingdoms, Neustria (the northwestern portion) and Austrasia (northeastern Gaul and the Rhineland), each of which was ruled by a mayor of the palace. The respective rulers of the two kingdoms fought bitterly for supremacy, and in 687 at the battle of Tetry, the Austrasian mayor, Pepin of Heristal, defeated the Neustrian mayor and united the two kingdoms. It was thus the task of Pepin and his son Charles Martel to restore centralized government in the Frankish kingdom and to combat the expanding power of Islam.\n\nCharles Martel was the illegitimate son of Pepin of Heristal and a noblewoman named Alpaide. When Pepin died in 714, Charles successfully asserted his claims to power over the resistance of Pepin's widow, Plectrude, and became mayor of the palace. Charles attracted and maintained a group of personal retainers who formed the core of the royal army. Most of his reign as mayor of the palace was spent in checking the expansion of the Saracens in southern France and in the Rhone-Saône Valley.\n\nIn October 732 Charles won a major victory against the Saracens outside Poitiers despite the fact that the invaders were mounted and the Franks were on foot. The battle, aside from temporarily checking the expansion of the Moslems, was of long-range significance because it was here that Charles became convinced of the necessity of cavalry. After Poitiers, Charles developed the cavalry as his primary offensive fighting force. This change, however, proved highly expensive, and the cost of supporting and training men on horseback led to the adoption of a means of support that had far-reaching consequences. Charles found it necessary to "borrow" considerable lands from the Church; he then dispersed these properties among his lay retainers. The old army of Frankish freemen became less important, and gradually a considerable social distinction developed between the mounted knight and the ordinary foot soldier. Thus the elite class of mounted warriors who dominated mediev
998809
www.roman-empire.net \nwww.travelplan.it/rome_guide.htm