Is love the only language everyone understands?
970301
if everyone understood love , the world wouldnt be  in such a bad state as it is today.... so i have to disagree
829617
Sure we can all tell you what love is, but I can tell you right now you will not get one same answer. Love means different things to different people. So the meaning of love to me will not be the same as your feelings.
246112
Love does not sees languages. It doesnt sees the color or culture.it looks upon the adjustment from both.
138162
We DON'T have to. It happens naturally. LOVE is what rules the world. That's the connection we all have with one another. We, human beings, at the end, ALL we want is to be LOVED.
686791
NO.\nShould all loves head towards marriages?
669159
No words are used in 'my' language:)\nYou say it with your eyes and with your entire being.\nIn fact you are understood before you even say it.\nIts strange how the same thing makes our eyes sparkle with different hues as we express the same feelings in different situations. To a kid and to a parent and to a friend, we all say ' i love you' and yet they all are so different. What a marvelous thing human being is.
776819
English, which is known as the universal language.
125911
"Anyone"?  Does that mean romantic love?  Does that mean love between two girls and a male?  If you have cosmic or divine love then you love everyone and everything.  So are we talking about love for two girls and one guy like for a polygamy marriage?  Or is it just friendship love.  If it is friendship love then why not.  If it is love for marriage then check the laws in your state.  If it is romantic love then there may be various reasons for the feelings of love.  And it might seem that the love between one guy and one of the girls is different than the love this guy has for the other girl.  Is the love equivalent if not equal?  Or is someone being fooled?
1135210
it should be the only language spoken.
624051
the "lingua pura"... english!\n\nbecause it is the universal language for just about anything... communications, science, technology, mathematics, banking and finance among others...
159164
love, sweet love...No, not just for some, but for everyone...
1016323
Yes I believe love is a movement. L-O-V-E love changes everything!!!!!
422593
I don't think everyone speaking the same language would be a particularly good idea.  Each language has its own interesting features and body of literature and if we all spoke only the one language we'd lose that diversity.\n\nWhat might be a good idea is if every country agreed to teach one particular language as the first "second" language in schools so that when people travelled abroad they could guarantee being able to communicate.  English has this role to some extent, but the trouble is that it is quite a difficult language to learn to speak well.  It is also the first language of many nations and so that puts those who don't speak it as a first language at a disadvantage.  Something easy and neutral like Esperanto might be a good candidate for this... Esperanto has its own problems, but on the whole it's easier to learn than English and is definitely politically neutral.
1043718
bcoz english is the universal language...most people know it and learn to speak however.... Let's  give a petition to our Indian gov...requiring hindi to be a universal language !!!!!!!!!
1110382
everywhere!  i <3 using <3's!!  but if you overuse it, it loses its meaning- like when you use "love" too much, it loses its meaning
116206
When I was in love I just told that. That is the best way. I think we people are very strange race. We love each other but don´t tell. What´s all about this. Is it really so hard to say: Hey, I like you, and I think I fellt in love with you???
4446
Language is always changing, therefore the language that was first spoken by humans no longer exists.  It is the mother that gave birth to all of the languages that exist today.  The mother's spirit is in all the children, but none of the children are the mother. \n \nA sort of Holy Grail of linguistics would be to discover what the mother of all languages was like.  It's possible that with enough study we can figure out something about it-- we have after all learned quite a bit about Indo-European, a prehistorical language which has been discovered by careful examinations of the commonalities between modern languages stretching all the way across Europe and Asia. \n \nThe first language probably developed along with the first speakers, people who lived long enough ago that not just their cultures but even their bodies were substantially different from how things are now. \n \nIt's pure speculation, but I think that sign language and spoken language probably emerged at the same time, in that strange noble race.  Sign and spoken languages seem to me to share a spiritual core, to be the same in their essence.  The great singular power of our facility of language is to make any thing mean any other thing.  A pile of rocks may mean a burning fire.  Some strangely shaped lines can mean the very "meaning" itself.  What a glorious world. \n \n<3