I've managed to badly split my infinitive, how do I remedy this?
958582
Get a medical dictionary.
502912
Is.... it.... thefact... that.... he.....can'tfinisha....sentence.... without.... seperating..... everyword?
455863
This question hurts my English.
228041
Slow down and reread what you're typing.  Ask yourself if the letters on the paper or screen spell the word you intended.
179385
A missing 'e' and an extra 'in'
586267
It's okay, but instead of "This" say what you mean - what does "this" refer to? - Oh, and ditch the comma.  You aren't combining two independent clauses, so you really don't need it.
1133907
The rule about not splitting infinitives was invented by grammarians who decided that English should be more like Latin.  In Latin and other languages the infinitive is one word (French: parler, to speak, German sprechen, to speak) and it is impossible to split it.  In English we use to + verb as the infinitive, so it is possible to split it.  This is a 'rule' that needs to disappear. Often splitting the infinitive is the only way to write or say what we actually mean in a way that doesn't sound awkward or hypercorrect.
734271
I see one run on sentence that needs to be split. I also see two others that should be combined into one\n\nThat said, a good writer never pads the piece. The whole idea is to make it as clear & concise as possible. As a writer, the only legitimate way to extend this is to add information.\n\nI just did a search & on the first page I opened & found the answer to your problems - with an "s".. Your info or the web page info is incorrect, one or the other  There was enough other info to expand the reason for the tie.\n\nAfter a quick search, I found additional info & an error you may wish to correct.       This is a much better version than the 3 sentences I wrote earlier, correct? That is what I mean by clear & concise.\n \nYou've done all right so far. just a little more..
672974
Go buy a copy of "500 Latin Verbs Fully Conjugated in all the Tenses".  I'm too lazy to walk all the way downstairs and to the other end of the house to get my copy or else I'd tell you.\n\nEDIT:  OK, I'm awake now, lol.  Since "go" is an intransitive verb, there is NO SUCH THING as a passive form of it.  LOLOLOLOL
337201
Dude, I've read your question like 6 times and am still confused. How about correcting the grammar and spelling, then forming cohesive sentences.
905345
Try reading backwards!!!\n\nBewarethesangerinitiative\n\nCan you read it now?
724636
Im not quite sure what your supposed to do but I'm guessing you change each singlar to plural.\n\nI don't want to give you the answers, and you are not stupid. This just may be hard for you.\n\nJust think. It's not ONE microphone its TWO microphoneS.\n\nIt's not ONE baby its TWO babies.\n\nYou know what each of these words is in plural form! If you need more help, post it in additional details.\n\nUse that Its not ONE its TWO structure. Believe me, if you know the english language it will jsut come to you.
1156624
You can't. Those two words do not even go in the same sentence
188255
I can answer only part of the question (Yahoo answers, pls feel free to claim back half a point from my score!).\n\nActually, many native speakers DO make mistakes when speaking in this way - particularly where there is a 'false' candidate for the subject - e.g. 'Foreign investment in many states of the US has been growing in recent years.'  Here some native speakers' 'automatic grammar system' can be fooled in fast conversation into applying a plural verb because of the 'many states', which is plural.\nThe bit of your answer I can't really answer is how to help you get it right instinctively every time.  However, as many native speakers are sometimes 'tripped up' by this in fast speech, there is nothing for you to feel too bad about if you do too.  Unlike many (less educated) native speakers, you are at least aware of the explicit rule and will always be able to correct yourself - either in speech or in writing.
294936
Use the spelling check feature next time.  It is impossible to tell what you are asking.\n\nExurate?
441342
Try remedial English.
1092592
nat/ural/lye/za/shun \nmy bad messed it up the first time