If we the people who use Yahoo Answers, formed a country ... what would it be like?
958948
It would be the "Land of Jousting."  The Republicans on one side of the country and the Democrats on the other.  They would shout insults at each other and then give each other the "thumbs up" or the "thumbs down."  Some would be clones and would try to sneak into the other side, but they would be caught and would suffer unbearable thumbs down before they were "deleted."
587793
Africa was arbitrarily divided by other countries. The "borders" were invented. Tribes that had been at war for centuries were just supposed to get along now because some french or english or german idiot said they belonged to the same country. How would you feel if someone just told you your state was now apart of canada or Iraq, and now has to abide by its laws?
715912
How about EarthGov?\n\nI think a world government would require a body sort of like the United Nations, but with the powers endowed in Congress.  I do believe that the U.S.'s three-branch system works well, and should be (with minor tweaking to accommodate everyone) used as a base.\n\nTherefore, a united judicial system consisting of people from around the world would be required (for the first few generations, until we accept everybody else as equal citizens), before eventually basing it just on qualifications.\n\nAn elected leader, like the President would be a good choice, just as long as that person is a good person and actually knows what he's doing (after all, he'd be leading 6+ Billion people.)\n\nYet the government would also have international abilities that the U.N. has, so no one could accuse one country of butting into another's business.\n\nAnd if the "New Founders" are ever not sure what to do, they can just reference to the dozens of movies, T.V. shows, and books which have covered this subject, such as "The 5th Element & Star Trek".
954036
They keep trying to. Actually it'd be closer to a semi-autonomous country or region, similar to what Scotland is becoming to the UK. Having more home rule, but still technically part of the Commonwealth.
832286
Good question. Thank you. I could think of a hundred things, but let me just share a little. In my hope I see a time when we, meaning the great collective "we" of humanity, would no longer find a need to be afraid of one another any more. A world without the fear of the Other, but instead, a recognition that we are all related, all a single family. We would do what all families do, only on a global scale. We would care for those who were old or sick or in need. And we would be busy working to help one another grow. We would reach out into the Universe around us while we protected and nurtured this fragile island home, Earth.
35266
I agree with ghostofthe3stoges!\nCan we use Yahoo Answers to change the system?\nI think that should be the featured question.
1122503
Hi, \n\nThat would be national boundary!!\n\nThanks!!
43231
For some people, their whole lives revolve around Yahoo Answers. Pity. What did they do before it existed? And what will they do if their power goes out? What kind of life will those poor, sorry people have, then? ;)
126453
Don't forget to choose the best answer.\nWe are real people answering real questions with real answers so please show your appreciation by choosing the best answer!\n\nBecause were superior and if you don't like it then get out of our country. No one wants you here anyway.
217531
Probably not,  We would need one language, one culture and total political agreement.  There has not been peace for thousands of years, I doubt if we start anytime soon.
390607
By today, it would be an idependent  federation of states, with a Prime Minister of each. The Head of State would be HM Queen Elizabeth II (who, is it must be noted, non executive)\n\nIt is possible that the Civil War might have been avoided, although slavery would have been abolished, probably gradually in the mid 19th Century.\n\nThe British would have taken America into the First World War in 1914, and I doubt that the people of America would have allowed London to retain such power over foreign policy afterwards, although perhaps they would have been influenced enough by London to join World War 2 in 1939.
1158134
How what works, the world? I doubt it although they may have united to become the EU there is no sense of common history or common cause. I don't see too much cooperation in the EU.
834971
ok, and your question to us would be........?
996512
I don't think it could happen at least in the realistic sense.  A nation is defined by its borders.  How can one nation have many borders on different contents.  You can have an economic union something of the sort of the E.U. but they are adrift with no real Constitution and have multiple social issues.
879
the only way to form one is to get big enough to where the us reconizes it\n\n\nps make a website and put on as ?
888647
if our and other countries decided to help them
240950
I think we should.  People would then move to where their ideas are held important and are tolerated.  The states that ended up most successful would become models for the others.  Also decentralization would help remove the imperialistic tendencies of the federal government and cause less world wide hatred.