Is there any difference between 'diplomatic immunity' and 'diplomatic privileges'?
951959
In essence, diplomatic immunity puts some people outside the scope of certain laws if they have diplomatic status.  The following web site gives a good idea of the nature of the protections afforded to diplomatic personnel:\n\nhttp://www.state.gov/m/ds/immunities/c9127.htm\n\nDiplomatic privileges refer more to benefits, as opposed to protections.  One such privilege is immunity.  Other types of privileges afforded to diplomatic personnel include such things as special handling at a port of entry, and expedited baggage service, as well as reduced rates for certain goods or services.
147024
It seems not as stated below, but you may want to check with a lawyer\n\nWithholding of removal is in some ways similar to asylum, but it has a higher standard. To qualify for withholding of removal under 8 U.S.C. section 1231(b)(3), the non-citizen must demonstrate that it is more likely than not that he/she would be subject to persecution based on race, religious beliefs, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion. Unlike with asylum, an immigrant who is granted relief under withholding of removal is only given a right not to be removed to a specific country. Unlike asylees, non-citizens who are granted withholding of removal do not have the right to apply for a green card. They actually have a final order of removal against them, so if they travel outside the U.S., they will not be allowed to return.
1082405
Your question is impossible to answer without added facts. I assume that the limited vs. absolute immunity you're referring to is to certain kinds of criminal prosecution or civil suit, particularly libel and slander.\n\nIf this is a slander or libel situation you're concerned about, then it would appear from those facts that the DA would be enjoying complete immunity, as discussions with another attorney concerning a case, particularly in terms of a plea agreement, would certainly fall within the "activities intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process" definition for immunity.\n\nRegardless, good luck suing any district attorney in any city in any state in this country.
1020880
politics : refers to communications between diplomats of the same rank\ncomputers : communications between similar processes running in different computers or communication between devices that are equal in the way they exchange information and control communications
379767
"Look Officer, I'm have a diplomatic passport and diplomatic immunity ...so I don't have to obey any law."
1124608
The Privileges and Immunities Clause (U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1) prevents states from treating citizens of other states in a discriminatory manner. Unlike the Dormant Commerce Clause, there is no market participant exception to this clause.\n\nIn the case of Corfield v. Coryell (1823), Justice Bushrod Washington determined that the clause protected\n\n    ...in their nature, fundamental; which belong, of right, to the citizens of all free governments; and which have, at all times, been enjoyed by the citizens of the several states which compose this Union, from the time of their becoming free, independent, and sovereign.     \n \n\n\nIn his explanation of the scope of the rights protected by the clause, Washington included the right to travel through states for business or agricultural purposes, the right of the use of the courts, the right to purchase and hold property, and an exemption from higher taxes than state residents pay.
416946
It is very difficult.  Generally, diplomatic positions are given to people as a patronage job.  You are expected to have a very intricate knowledge of the country and its political positions, and have to pass a number of background checks by the government.
846501
England works a touch different than the US (in regards as to where to submit), but the child may have duel citizenship.  Get to the Indian Consulate to get these questions answered
98242
An "honoary consul" is not the same as a "consul general". \n\nThe Consul General is a professional diplomat, and the "honorary consul" usually works ad-honorem or only for expenses.\n\nTo be an honorary consul, you must be named by the foreign minister or Secretary of State of a country. You need good political or business connections to the country you  want to represent. You do not necessarily have to be a citizen of that country, but must register as a foreign agent.
701079
No.  That's part of the reasoning behind the pres only being an American citizen.  You can never fully trust that a person who has dual alliances is going to look out for your best interest if a conflict of interest arises.
615030
The "Convention" is actually a treaty.\n\nThe problem is that a treaty, under US Law, has more authority than the Constitution.\n\nJust as "Indian Reservations" (that's their legal name) are exempt from constitutional law, children would receive a status equivelant to Diplomatic Immunity.\n\nTheir parents and police would be powerless to correct them or interfere without the child's permission.\n\nThat's why we can't sign.\n\nThank you for your time.
268691
go to your consulate or agency in charge of passport, amendment, renewal, etc
753679
The Ambassador is the official representative of a country in another. Duties include dealing with trade, migration, mutual interests, etc.\n\nHowever, in many cases, ambassadors are political appointees who are given the post as a payment for favors or contributions, and the actual work is done by professional career staff.\n\nIn countries whose relationship to the US is difficult, such as Russia, Middle East, Venezuela, etc, the ambassador often is a career professional diplomat, due to the sensitivity of the post.
121198
Yes, there is a difference because the people who born in US have a constitutional citizenship, that’s a citizenship derive by constitution but there are people who actually are US citizens but don’t born in US, nether in US military base camp and that people have a statutory citizenship and that’s derived by law. That people enjoy must of the benefits in the constitution and the responsibilities but not all of theme. For example the people who are from Puerto Rico are US citizens but that people can’t vote for the president of the US in Puerto Rico, if that people move to Florida or New York or other state of the nation then they can vote for the president. .
321041
yes you can!!\nhuman rights act in the uk relates to fairness of trial.\njudges are not protected my such immunity, as they doing their job wrong.
642034
Ofcourse they do.However their passports are special Diplomatic Passports and not normal passports.This is because as heads of states they are entitled to some special priveleges and clearances which normal people do not require.
771908
Singapore Ministry of Foreign Affairs\nLegalisation of Documents (Procedures)\nhttp://www.mfa.gov.sg/internet/consular/services/services_legal.htm#\n\nOr you may contact the Embassy of Singapore in Washington and ask them:\n\n3501 International Place, NW\nWashington DC 20008\nhttp://app.mfa.gov.sg/generator/asppages/washington/Homepage.asp\nTelephone : 001-1-(202) 537-3100\nFax: 001-1-(202) 537-0876\nGeneral E-Mail: singemb_was@sgmfa.gov.sg\nConsular E-Mail: singemb_con_was@sgmfa.gov.sg