Is installing .Net Framework 2.0 a good idea?
962014
Actually 3.0 is out.\n\nI installed 2.0 and had problems. \n\n.NET is not so much for us, the average users anyway.\n\nNow I'm very particular what "updates" I install.\n\nStick with 1.1 and keep your Java updated.\n\nOne thing you can to take the load off is to turn off Visual Themes and disable unnecessary Microsoft services.
442699
You need to install  Dotnet 2.0 Framework and DotNet Frame work 2.0 SDK before installing VS 2005.\n\nVisual Studio needs .net 2.0 to run.\n\nIts asking for that.\n\nFirst download Dotnet 2.0 Framework setup install it then DotNet Frame work 2.0 SDK setup install it.  then install VS 2005.
818014
You would need to install .NET and IIS locally to test (unless you are using an older version of ASP, then just IIS)\n\nNow, if you want to build out true functional test, then you use a program like NUNIT within the asp application\n\nhttp://nunitasp.sourceforge.net/tutorial/index.html
1169601
Yes. This is one of the drawbacks to the .NET framework is that the redistributable is rather large. Windows 2003 and later include this. Linux and Mac have it available. You are sacrificing this dependency for cross platform programability.\n\nIf you don't need it to be cross platform, you could develop using a native Win32 compiler.
122392
The previous .Net version of VB/C#/etc supported both desktop, mobile and web applications, for .Net Framework 1.1+.  The new Visual Studio for 2005 support the .Net 2.0.\n\nMicrosoft is releasing a scaled down version of Visual Studio 2005 with just VB called Visual Basic Express 2005.  It will support the same .Net platform, but NOT do web and mobile developement, nor will it have the XML editor.\n\nSee the link below for more info...
836374
If you built your application using VS 2005 and it is compiled as a .NET 2.0 application it will not run under .NET 1.1 even if you used only classes that are found in .NET 1.1\n\nTo solve your problem either the host needs to support .NET 2.0, or you rebuild your application using .NET 1.1 (using VS 2003 for example).\n\nAnyways, in MSDN, new classes are marked with "new to 2.0"  in case you want to know which classes are new to 2.0
40806
Yes, but I'd advise against it.  It's better to do a "clean install" and clean out all the cruft that has built up from all the applications that you have installed.\n\nSave all your data to CDs and start from scratch.  You'll feel better in the end.
212154
.NET is very complex and advanced, I'd really recommend you go on a course and buy a good book / manual rather than trying to learn from resources on the net.\n\nThis website http://www.appdev.com/promo.asp?page=SE00005 does provide a free of charge sample training CD that might help you decide whether further training is for you tho.
1029976
It all depends if you have .NET 2.0 or .NET 1.0\n\n.NET 2.0 has strict security settings that require some services. But  you should be able to run that application from safemode since it will be treated like any other application. \n\nRemember if you are using some service that is not turned on in safemode than obviously you cannot run it. But in most cases you should have no problem.
1102655
according to my knowledge when you crate a data base in Vs.Net  that must be create in DBMS  which will support your vs.net. or there must be some problem with the installation  the CD must be incomplete. just try installing it again
67972
First:make sure your host supports asp.net/.net framework installed or not.\nSecond:Uploadthe application files like .vb and .aspx and .ascx files\nThird:Put the Bin folder in the  root of your site\nwith the dll(s) in it
829641
So install .net 1.1 on the web server.\n\nOr else compile your application targeted to whatever version of .net is on the server. If you don't have it, you can download the .net  SDKs here:\n\n1.0:\nhttp://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=4FE5BDB5-C7A7-4505-9927-2213868A325B&displaylang=en\n\n2.0\nhttp://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=FE6F2099-B7B4-4F47-A244-C96D69C35DEC&displaylang=en
511623
it's a "place" for programming different languages and it supports J#, c#, c++, VB, and ASP..version 1.1 is the older one which is the same as visual studio.Net and 2.0 is visual studio 2003. there is a beta version for visual studio 2007 available for testers only and it's amazing how many new features are added to it. anyone who never touched a keyboard could program now :s
1077105
Yes, you can download and install VB .Net Express 2005 for free.  I don't know about MSDN.  Oh wait, there is an express version of that too.
346775
Be sure to unistall the framework and vs completly. Otherwise you gotta format because you got the registry messed up.
648111
Hello :\n\nThe .NET Framework enables developers to build, deploy, and run XML Web services and Microsoft .NET–connected applications. It provides a highly productive environment for integrating existing investments with next-generation applications and services.\n\nThe Microsoft .NET Framework version 2.0 redistributable package installs the .NET Framework runtime and associated files required to run applications developed to target the .NET Framework v2.0. The .NET Framework version 2.0 improves scalability and performance of applications with improved caching, application deployment and updating with ClickOnce, support for the broadest array of browsers and devices with ASP.NET 2.0 controls and services.\n\nI have all of these info , \n\nI dont know if enough info \n\nHave a nice day \n\noceanosoft group owner
775699
Yes, though it is not going to be as efficient.  It should not have any problems.  Server 2003 is pretty much the same as W2K except is has more features.  Hard to find out exactly what you are looking for, but feel free to follow up.