Would more people vote if you could do it online?
968116
I can't say I trust that.  To paraphrase Bill Maher, yeah, go ahead and try it, and some 14-year-old hacker in Finland will hand the presidency to Kylie Minogue.\n\nI hate going inside a church as much as anybody, but I make exceptions to vote.
544778
www.votetoimpeach.org
943133
when you have an answer, i might give you a vote
899097
I'd be for placing a ceiling on the amount of air time the candidates could obtain,all candidates having the same size basket of campaign money,regardless of where it came from,so that maybe,just maybe,we could get some people eligible to receive votes by the people for their platform messages and not the size of their purse
866000
To be able to vote you need 250 points or greater to do all this you are asking.  Keep answering some more questions and eventually you will get there.
820707
Yes.  But the key to the future is "proportional representation."  Look for it online.  Instead of majority rule taking all, voters are guaranteed representation proportional to the membership of their party, similar to representation by state or district. \n\nVoter turnout increases when people's votes count toward representation no matter how big or small.  \n\nI believe in adding representation based on party affiliation.  So there could be a Senate with two reps per group, and a House based on reps per population or membership.  Since some people may be affiliated with more than one, any group or individual could propose legislation, but decisions would be based on consensus between all parties affected.  So you can legislate for your own party or district; but if legislation affects the greater public, it must be adopted by consent of those affected.\n\nThis would encourage direct participation and representation in government, and help to organize the population by party and by issue.  Policies based on common solutions would invite practical ideas and cooperative support, instead of campaigns that exploit emotions or media stereotypes to manipulate the vote, divide the public, and fuel conflict and debate over problems.\n\nThe government is not a failure but the population has outgrown the current system.  As a society we have developed the technology and communication to localize government and to organize by interest so that groups no longer need to compete for power.  Solutions will come from cooperation between groups. So that is where government is heading, based on expanding on the current model we have for checks and balances between the various branches and levels.
841445
I haven't heard about this specifically, but in theory, I agree- it would just bring in uninformed voters. We need voters who have opinions that need to be heard; the payoff of voting is having someone in office to do the job correctly and get things done, what's a better incentive to vote than that?
699213
with enough signatures by registered voters you could be a write in canidate.Im sure you would get some votes.
999537
I wish more people would then they would know more about a computer then what to browse the internet and send email.  There are so much more things you can do with them.
1024098
Something like this perhaps...\nhttp://www.vote-smart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=CNIP9107
37516
answer more questions, also vote, and rate questions
1162945
i wonder if it could be bought online?
1067248
they vote for it for themselves, don't you wish you could?
188748
http://people.yahoo.com/\n\nIf they elected to be visible, then they may be on there.\n\nGood Luck!
325917
YES FROM TIME TO TIME TO GET INPUT FROM PEOPLE
964535
No... there needs to be no electronic involvement.  Votes need to be done on paper, countable, and recountable.  We must have a system that can be verified and legitimized.  I have already volunteered to spend many, many hours counting ballots (along with two others).
785084
In some cases yes, but no matter who puts up a list, not everybody wil be happy. Why don't you make one and we all can vote.