Assembly:i can't compile my .asm file it says unable to open here's in DOS?
961396
This doesn't sound like a problem with your compiler. Make sure you can open the file a:&#92;Firstprogram.asm without errors. I suspect there is a problem there.
230935
Is that a file that it is complaining is missing, or a file you have, but it's refusing to recognize?  If you have it, have you tried moving the file into the folder of the program itself?\n\nFor running older programs that the "compatability" features can't handle, several options come to mind, but they all require you to install Win95/98 in some manner, if you still have a Win95/98 CD.\n\nYou might try setting up a dual-boot environment with multiple partitions and just booting into Win95/98 when you need to run that program.  This method is a bit inconvenient, but will give you the best performance possible for your program.\n\nAnother option is to try VirtualPC, VMware, Bochs, QEMU, or DOSBox to emulate/virtualize another PC within your XP environment.  I've personally used DOSBox and QEMU to play some old DOS games, and I think you can use one or both of them to install a Win95 environment, but I've never actually tried that.  The problem with DOSBox is that after tweaking the "cycles" to the max, it only runs about as fast as a 66 mhz 486 on my 2.4 ghz computer.  But perhaps other emulators would perform better for you.
618206
Whoa, that's really weird... You can't make a file called "con" either, or a file called "con.con" I looked up some forums on this, as far as I can tell there are a number of other words you can't use:\n\nLPT1\nCOM2\n\nApparently it's to do with the fact that MS-DOS used to use those words to mean things like "The printer" or "This Communication Port", I guess that they are still held as reserved words in order to keep up compatibility with old DOS programs...
1072713
Looks like ur dll files are corrupted or system over heating.
304149
just check the box which says to open the program with this kinda dfile always. this shud work\n\n(plzz rate a s best answer)
131532
The aplication may be a virus .\nIf you are sure that the application works you may need to reinstall it.\nYou can also try running it via DOS mode
357354
When you reopen your program make sure that you have opened the project file using visual studio and not just the .cs file because without the project file you will not be able to compile or run your project\n\nhope this helps
163236
go to dos prompt.\ntype in "EDIT" then a space then the program name with extension.\nIt will bring up a basic text editor that hopefully will open the file properly.  (works best on INI, BAT, CMD) \nEXE's a re complied differnetly and might not be accessed by user.\n\nTo make your own program for dos, compose a new file, use correct DOS syntax and save it as a "BAT" file. It stands for batch which is translated by DOS.
726939
It sounds like that dll has been overwritten or corrupted some how. You could try the following link \n\nhttp://support.microsoft.com/default...1&PA=1&SD=HSCH\n\nI would suggest you create a system restore point first and make backups of important data.
889472
Hi!\n\nFirst, be ready to back up your registry...\nNow: Start>Run>regedit\nGo to File>Export type a name for the registry file, like : original, etc, etc etc and make sure that ALL is selected, not the Selected Branch...\nThen, go to Edit>Find\nIn the dialog box, type umaxpcls.sys \nThe string umaxpcls.sys will, eventually, be found.\nNow, replace the key (the value) with ab306p.sys.\nSave your registry, if asked.\nMake sure both files have the same path, so, copy ab306p.sys near umaxpcls.sys  (in the same folder). You can find it by pressing F3 (or Find File) in Explorer.\n\nGood luck!
586661
There are situations where assembly code is the\n"right" solution -- typically when special instructions\nare needed or on rare occasions when a tiny piece of\ncode is both critical and not sufficiently optimized\nby a compiler.\n\nHowever, for the Sieve of Eratosthenes, a good compiler\nshould be able to generate code which is comparable to\nwhat most humans could write.\n\nI mention this to explain why I would recommend that\nyou take some C source for the Sieve and have your\ncompiler generate assembly code for you.\n\nOn a Linux/Unix/Solaris system, use the "-S" option:\n\ncc -S -O sieve.c\n\nand then take a look at the file "sieve.s".\n\nFast and easy.\n\nIf you want the assembly code to be easier to read,\ndon't optimize the code (ie. don't use the "-O" option).
1118835
The best solutiom for this is to  get source of the same kernel and compile it that will resolve your issue.\n\nkshounish
344403
Please to be installing the crack with the "instal" option, then to copy the .dll file to the proper virtuality, then to click upon the "proceed to crack" trigger!\n\nGood luck and the roses!
337842
ru sure ur adding a dll file itself?\nIf yes the dll may be corrupted.
167955
Well you can if you compile it, I forget exactly how.\n\nBut if you just have the dll I don't believe you can. It would sort of defeat the purpose if that sort of information was editable by users.
15588
This may sound like a foolish question, but: are you sure you're entering a program executable file?  Just be sure you're using the right filename.\n\nAlso, depending on the program, you may need to type the entire file path to it.
39546
The Global Asembly Cache is where you put shared assemblies in .Net.  A shared assembly has members that can be called by other assebmlies without having to be physically in the same directory.\n\nYour .Net resources should make reference to the "gacutil" utility that does this job for you.  But, you have to have a "strongly named assembly" to do this, which requires the Assembly version to be static (not have the *, which you already have done), and have a public/private key set (created by the "sn" utility).  Also, "gacutil" is a development tool.  Once your product is "finished", add a .Net setup project (using the Setup Wizard) to generate an install program that will install your program and register your share assemblies automatically.\n\nAddressing the first issue, I move DLL's to target PC's all the time without having to recompile or register with regasm.  Regasm is supposed to be used to allow .Net assemblies be called by COM component.  Since you feel you need to use regasm, do the members in the DLL refer externally to any non-.Net resources, controls, etc?