Any opinions on the Burton Vapor?
967683
The baron is the custom wide board and is a TON heaver. Comparing the Vapor is not a comparison at all. The vapor will be extremely quicker edge to edge and have way more pop in and out of the turn. Depending on the year of your baron the shape is totally different as well. Burton claims the Vapor is the lightest board on the market but in actuality the Palmer Honey III is. So if your looking for just weight check out the Palmer's and save $300. The Canyon is a very stable and very predictable ride where as the Vapor is quick to enter and exit the turn. It is a board that demands your attention. Don't even think about taking the Vapor to the park the Alumifly core will dent to all hell. If your looking for a light weight, super quick all mountain trail board the Vapor will work great but keep in mind there is no sitting back on this board.
881274
It's hard to say because everyone likes different features. But I'll give you a link where you can go and get reviews on just about every single paintball product out there. \n\nI just picked up an Odyssey RPM on ebay for $100 and that was a great deal. Guns with the kind of features this gun has go for $250, easy. But do some research and see what you might think will fit you best.
773192
I honestly didn't notice the whiskey taste but it doesn't taste like Taquila You're for sure right on that!! I haven't casted a vote yet, I'm not sure that I can say Yeah or Neah. I do love the new mint chocolate Bailey's That is perfect on ice. I love Bailey's anyway but I just can't get enough of the new one with mint! The caramel I haven't ried it yet, because I know I won't like it because i hate Caramel!!
424025
burton or kemper. thats all i ever use, and have been using for years. they both have some pretty mellow graphics, not super flashy. i she a beginner or advanced? fiberglass cores are nice. woodcores get waterlogged. metal edged to great turns!
1167977
I bought a Bach two years ago and I really like it.  I have a 36 which isn't a bass bone, but it does have the F attachment.  They have lots of options w/ different triggers and in general are good horns.  They are a little pricey but very reliable and come w/ a warranty.  I'd recommend one to anyone looking for a horn to have for a while.
519179
If it helps, hell yeah i love 'em especially with a short leather mini, can't go wrong!!\n\nx
945070
Well to be honest it's not my style but if you like it that's what matters. I looked at the features and the reviews for it and it sounds like an excellent instrument. The style is a little much for me, but then again I'm middle aged and play acoustic. Never really cared for electric.But to each his own. Keep strumming. Peace
797177
I currently have the Evo2 which is the same thing as the evo3 but with a different circuit board. i havent had any problems with it yet, it runs great and it has a really good battery life. as opposed to a halo its a lot lighter and lesk boat-like. The door to open it is spring loaded so it can be difficult to deal with in a game at times but it locks open pretty nicely so all you have to do is fool around with it a little. It has a 5 rubber pronged rotating feed system that has eyes so that it stops rotating when something is in the neck. I havent had any problems with it breaking any balls inside the hopper like halos do sometimes, as well as many other electric hoppers. check www.actionvillage.com out as well as the forums on www.pbnation.com if you want to know more about it, but i would say it's a great investment.
698550
Out of the brands you have listed i would probably go for Sims as i have ridden one of there boards ( the fader ) before and really liked it. Ive ridden a morrow board before and hated it as it felt really stiff and heavy, but it doesent mean that its nessesarily a bad make its just that particular board didn't suit me. Out of the other companys you have mentioned i have never ridden any of there boards so its hard to give an accurate idea of which are the better ones. But M3 are quite respected and had an excellent team a few years back so they would be good, and LTD and Lemar are known for selling cheap but really good value for money boards and would be worth a try. \nSo if i were you i would go for Sims first them M3 and then probably Lemar. To be honest all these brands are ok you don't need to go for Burton like most of the people on this site think. I imagine that most of the people who rate them so highly have never ridden any other board and just like them as they are the most hyped brand. Yeah they are good but so are many other companys out there which sell boards at alot more reasonable price. Hope this helps you a bit
957639
I own an 05 165 Burton S-series and for what it is, I like it alot.\n\nWith the skins on, in walk mode, it works very well on steep climbs. Great traction and the fairly short length make switchbacks easy. The board is heavy and after a long hike I really feel it in my hips. The fact that you don't have to lift your feet as high as you would hiking with snow shoes on and then not having to ride with too much extra gear on your back evens this out for me a bit. I'm seriously considering some lighter bindings to help lighten the load as every ounce shaved makes a difference on a long hike. \n\nWhen you get to the top putting it back together is simple and it offers a great ride. In soft snow conditions the difference between this board and a non-split board is hardly noticable, it's a little softer than I'd like but that isn't a big deal. In hard conditions you can definately feel the difference but this has never bothered me as I would never ride this board in anything but powder or spring conditions. I've only dropped some small cliffs (10 footers or so) and it seems to handle it just fine, again it's a bit soft for this (at least softer than boards I like) but it stayed together no worries.\n\nNow for the cons. This board sucks for touring. In walk mode, always keep the skins on and don't try to ski it. Waaaaay too short and soft not too mention that the binding interface in walk mode isn't the strongest or stiffest of attachments. If the conditions are right and you practice alot you might be able to pull off some tele-turns on it but I find it's more trouble than it's worth. I find that it is much faster to just walk it (meaning using the board in walk mode with the skins on) over rolling terrain as stopping to put it together for a short descent and then taking it apart again for a climb and then repeating takes too much time and energy. Some friends have suggested I try kick-skins with it (kick skins are very short narrow skins that you stick to your base just underfoot and they allow just enough traction on flat ground or small climbs but allow for enough glide to make the skis a bit more skiable) but I haven't had a chance yet.\n\nOverall, it shouldn't be your only board and I'd never take it out at a resort but if you plan to make a lot of trips into the backcountry it's a great board for that. Definately practice with it on short backcountry trips before you really go for it. Oh and be sure to study up on your avalanche knowledge (consider taking a course) and never go into the back country alone and never forget a probe, shovel and beacon. You don't want to die out there.\n\nHere's a good website to check out:\n\nhttp://www.splitboard.com/
757571
i got carbon and its pretty good dont have most wanted yet so i cant compare but carbons at least worth the money .
996045
you should if you want to get a chaep affordable board get a world industries or marrow or the house or lamer or burton those are some good boards hope you rock on the hill
681821
I used to be a big 2 stroke fan and didn't want to jump on the 4 stroke (thumper) wagon but now I wouldn't go back. The 2 strokes are just as fast as the thumpers but they have a different kind of power. With the thumper I find it easier to ride, especially through turns and through technical stuff. It's a good usable power curve. They are also less maintnance. No gas mixing. No constant clutching (125cc). Longer gears. Low end power.
125611
I have one.\n\nIt's Black Butte Porter.\n\nYes, it's good.\n\nNo, you can't have any.
899553
I got the Vick's cool air humidifier.  (the cool air is supposed to be better)   I think it was about $30 and works pretty well.\n\nI wouldn't' think that trying to make one at home would be a good idea.  Something about sticking my head over a hot pot of water just doesn't sound safe.
852425
I agree that Burton's gear is over-priced, but the fact is that it's very good gear. But lets not kid ourselves... you get what you pay for. \n\nCheck these websites: \n\nwww.the-house.com and www.backcountry.com\n\nGood luck and enjoy your gear!\n\n:)
44927
I like it, but I like it for a number of specific reasons:\n\n1) It's porable enough to fit into my laptop bag.\n2) I can use it for rough compositing. (I'm a filmmaker / producer / director, so for me to be able to do things on location - even if it's just a quick diagram, or something is a *BIG* deal!)\n3) It works well, it's quick, and its easy to use.\n\nBAD POINTS:\n\nThe pen just isn't heavy enough. It feels like you're writing with a drinking straw (even WITH the battery installed.)\n\nIf you're doing graphical art with it, you might opt for something different. Like I said - for me, it's quick and easy, down and dirty.\n\nProfessionally, I *LOVE* my 18" Kurta - no longer made - sorry! :S It has a heavy pen, and it tracks nicely.\n\nAgain, I'm not using it for the cordless mouse, and for other purposes (other than graphic arts,) I use the specific tool for the job (ie: for me, editing something, I'll use a physical jog-shuttle wheel instead of the pen on the jog-shuttle control on the screen, though I have in a pinch - it wasn't that great.)\n\nSorry I couldn't give you any more of an answer, but I hope that helped!