What is the prison term for armed robery in Colorado?
964723
Alright, According to the attached website, aggravated robbery is a class 3 felony. Presumptive minimum is 4 years, presumptive maximum is 12 years. Check out the site it will give you a lot of good information. You will want to look up the laws concerning Federal sentencing guidelines, and what would cause a case of armed robbery to be bumped up to the federal level. I hope this helps.
112406
5 YEARS PRISON TIME IF PROSUCUTED.
1053150
i'm sure there is no web site that tells you because in texas you cant find iinfo on state jail prisoners.Also its not called dallas state jail.its a state jail thats in dallas called Dawson state jail.state jail prisoners are kind of in between prison and county jail.The most time they can do is 2 yrs, (just like county)where as t.d.c.j. your subject to parole reveiws.But for whatever reason t.d.c. provdes info for everyone except state jail dont ask me why
347235
Here's the website with links to all government related issues.\nhttp://www.colorado.gov/
811852
If you meant Mansfied Prison here is the direct link ,Good Luck
196293
If a plea is entered, you will get a pre-sentencing report.  This is one of these funny wobbler statutes where a guilty verdict could either be for a misdemeanor or a felony, based on whether time in state prison is received by the defendant.  If they are sentenced to time, then it is a felony.  The maximum penalty is three years.\n\nHere are the facts.\n\n273.5\n\nPC\nInjury on Spouse\nM\nFines and assessments - $640, $100, $20\n\n3 yrs. CP 1 yr. Treatment Program Firearm Restriction\n\nIf you are the defendant, you should get an attorney, as you could be facing jail time\n\nf you are talking about child corporal punishment with aggravating circumstances 273d, one year sentence and a felony charge.  Could be very nasty together.  Will depend on judge, prosecutor and the strength of the case.
362286
search www.coloradohistory.com
702540
The Columbia Alliance of Neighborhoods, a non profit corp in Washington State does just that.  \n\nIn the past year an average of one un-armed person a week is being sumarily executed by Portland Oregon area police for refusing to follow instructions, and no indictments to date.  \n\nWe are preparing a report...
353152
I just saw the last episode tonight, May 3. Those guys should be locked up for about 10 years for the first offense. They won't stop until they see some severe penalties for it. I'm not sure even the cops and judges really get it, how bad it is. They get slapped on the wrist.
538550
state corrections facility.
692302
1.) The rules governing the use/training with or certification with a Tazer (to include if it is required as part of employment) would be governed by the policy set by the Arkansas department of corrections and not by the states standards Commision.\n\n2.) The DOC policy does not appear to be available online at this time via the states website and would have to be research by hand at one of the facilities who should have a policy and proceedures manual readily available.\n\n3.) Tazer International - the makers of the device do not mandate a person be subjected to the device in order to be certified in it's use. However, it is common practice and normal department proceedure for most law enforcement and corrections facilities nationwide to mandate by policy that a employee must be subjected to the device (shot with it) in order to carry it in their job capacity.\n\n4.) The theory behind this practice is that when the device is used and an inmate or subject being arrested makes claims of incapacitation or other injury as a result of the tazer use, the officer that deployed the device will have a clear understanding of what effects or lack there of should and would be present. IN that way if a defendant or inmate makes a wild claim that is unlikely to be a cause of the tazer deployment it can be dismissed or reviewed with some level of skepticism depending on the circumstances.\n\n5.) Yes have no doubt that regardless of you calling it hurt, shock, surprise or whatever else you might define the feeling as. You will not like it and would never want it to happen again. (After having to be hit with it twice I do not feel any better about the how it feels)\n\n6.) Here are some phone numbers you can call and ask the policy question too, I would suggest that if your concerned about privacy or any other fall back from making such an inquiry that you either provide them another name or ask them politely if you can remain annonymous. I would recommend calling them in the order provided for best results.\n\nAdministrative Services:\nBenefits & Policy 870-850-8526\nAccreditation 870-267-6343\nAssistant Director 870-267-6241\nBoard of Correction 870-267-6754\n\nAlthough no information of use is provided here, the following links will carry you to the agencies you inquired about, additinonally the standards and policy for qualifications as governed by the commision does not indicate "corrections officers" and as such I cannot guarantee that the link provided applies to you in a correctional environment unless you are a sworn law enforcement officer:\nhttp://www.clest.org/clest_home.html -- Standards commission\nhttp://www.state.ar.us/doc/  - Arkansas Dept. of Corrections
1109109
I don;t think so. Why not try checking it at http://www.colorado.gov ? I think it's better if you make a phone call and ask the officials in the State
441432
That depends on what the one prior conviction was for. Assault with and deadly weapon, 245(a)(1) PC, is a potential felony for you. The sentence will really depend on if you caused any injury to the person and, if none, what the potential injury could have been. \n\nYour prior conviction could come into play if it was an assault or other type of violent crime. Ultimately, the judge will decide what you will get. No one here on this board can tell you.
649174
PARDONED IN TEXAS ARE YOU KIDDING !!!!! in Texas you do the crime you will do the time .have nice stay
773151
Here is a list of all correctional facilities.\nGood luck~
578494
From the Ohio Penal Code - I imagine it must be the same in other states as well...\n\n\n2907.05. Gross sexual imposition.\n\n(A)  No person shall have sexual contact with another, not the spouse of the offender; cause another, not the spouse of the offender, to have sexual contact with the offender; or cause two or more other persons to have sexual contact when any of the following applies:\n\n(1) The offender purposely compels the other person, or one of the other persons, to submit by force or threat of force. \n\n(2) For the purpose of preventing resistance, the offender substantially impairs the judgment or control of the other person or of one of the other persons by administering any drug, intoxicant, or controlled substance to the other person surreptitiously or by force, threat of force, or deception. \n\n(3) The offender knows that the judgment or control of the other person or of one of the other persons is substantially impaired as a result of the influence of any drug or intoxicant administered to the other person with the other person's consent for the purpose of any kind of medical or dental examination, treatment, or surgery. \n\n(4) The other person, or one of the other persons, is less than thirteen years of age, whether or not the offender knows the age of that person. \n\n(5) The ability of the other person to resist or consent or the ability of one of the other persons to resist or consent is substantially impaired because of a mental or physical condition or because of advanced age, and the offender knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the ability to resist or consent of the other person or of one of the other persons is substantially impaired because of a mental or physical condition or because of advanced age. \n\n(B)  Whoever violates this section is guilty of gross sexual imposition. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a violation of division (A)(1), (2), (3), or (5) of this section is a felony of the fourth degree. If the offender under division (A)(2) of this section substantially impairs the judgment or control of the other person or one of the other persons by administering any controlled substance described in section 3719.41 of the Revised Code to the person surreptitiously or by force, threat of force, or deception, a violation of division (A)(2) of this section is a felony of the third degree. A violation of division (A)(4) of this section is a felony of the third degree. \n\n(C)  A victim need not prove physical resistance to the offender in prosecutions under this section. \n\n(D)  Evidence of specific instances of the victim's sexual activity, opinion evidence of the victim's sexual activity, and reputation evidence of the victim's sexual activity shall not be admitted under this section unless it involves evidence of the origin of semen, pregnancy, or disease, or the victim's past sexual activity with the offender, and only to the extent that the court finds that the evidence is material to a fact at issue in the case and that its inflammatory or prejudicial nature does not outweigh its probative value. \n\nEvidence of specific instances of the defendant's sexual activity, opinion evidence of the defendant's sexual activity, and reputation evidence of the defendant's sexual activity shall not be admitted under this section unless it involves evidence of the origin of semen, pregnancy, or disease, the defendant's past sexual activity with the victim, or is admissible against the defendant under section 2945.59 of the Revised Code, and only to the extent that the court finds that the evidence is material to a fact at issue in the case and that its inflammatory or prejudicial nature does not outweigh its probative value. \n\n(E)  Prior to taking testimony or receiving evidence of any sexual activity of the victim or the defendant in a proceeding under this section, the court shall resolve the admissibility of the proposed evidence in a he
317709
In Colorado, statutory rape is when the one person is 15 years old or younger, and the other person is at least 4 years older.\n\nSee Title 18, Article 3, Section 405 of the Colorado Revised Statutes: http://www.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_dir/olls/HTML/colorado_revised_statutes.htm