Explain comparative stuudy between cost effectivencess and performance.?
963386
Search out the Google Web!! You will get a list regarding unlimited number of options. Choose the one which is convenient to you, you are interested the most in.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n.
966608
The complete cost of an item taking into account all the costs to manufacture that item compared to the retail performance in sales profit for that same item
628911
In economics, business, and accounting, a cost is the value of inputs that have been used up to produce something, and hence are not available for use anymore. In business, the cost may be one of acquisition, in which case the amount of money expended to acquire it is counted as cost. In this case, money is the input that is gone in order to acquire the thing. This acquisition cost may be the sum of the cost of production as incurred by the original producer, and further costs of transaction as incurred by the acquirer over and above the price paid to the producer. Usually, the price also includes a mark-up for profit over the cost of production.\n\nEffectiveness means the capability of, or success in, achieving a given goal. Contrary to efficiency, the focus of effectiveness is the achievement as such, not the resources spent, so anything that is effective is not necessarily efficient.\n\nAn ordinary way to distinguish between effectiveness and efficiency:\n\neffectiveness: doing the "right" things \nefficiency: doing the things "right"
558765
The difference between budget and cost would be a budget is the money they have to spend on planes, repairs, crew, etc... the cost is the ammount you have to pay.  However, do to them having less budget usually means their fares are lower due to them not having as many commodities.  So US Airways although might not have the best planes, crew, etc... will cost less than it's big flashy brother American Airlines.
1083515
In all honesty, I think they are equal in terms of what they can/do.  They are both big players in the market and do their job well.  There is enough competition between them to keep them on their toes to provide you the best anti-virus service and definition files.  For me, I would only weigh two things - price and reputation.  If the prices are close, and I would guess they are, I would opt for Symantec's Norton AntiVirus software.  This is only because they seem to be more widely recognized, in my opinion.  How this has any affect on the overall product, I would doubt it would carry any weight.  It just makes me more comfortable going with a product that I feel has a bigger share of the market and, therefore, MIGHT have a better overall product.  Norton AV wins 51% of my vote.
375388
Benchmarking = is basically the primary example at which you compare/measure goods, services or a value against.\n\nSimple example: say you are a high jumper and you measure/benchmark your performance against the last olympc gold medalist.\n\nre-engineering means that you are re-designing something which could be numeric, scientific, visual etc.
654359
Define effective and long run.\n\nIt works for large numbers yes, but it is developed to work with actual numbers. When applying TSM well, you'll even beat a calculator. But in math you work with formulas en equations and the benifits from TSM will be marginal.
137216
Less now than ever before.  The key to maximum performance now is matching the CPU, Memory, Bus, Hard drive and Video speeds.  Increasing any one of these may have little effect if the other four are "slow" in comparison.
972863
Do you mean performance as you see it or performance of data transmitted across the Internet.  Or do you mean the performance of data stored on the Internet?  Access speeds?  Download or upload speeds?\n\nAlot of information can be listed here as this is a very broad question.\n\nUsually you are looking for your Internet connection speed and that is determine by your ISP.  You also need to consider the computer memory, video card memory and the processor speed of the computer connecting.\n\nBeyond that there are numerous other factors.
728709
Both terms are different ways of saying the same thing...they both mean to "acquire the greatest quality, in the greatest quantity for the least amount of monetary expenditure".  This of course means that there will be a subjective judgment performed by the purchaser as to what quality is acceptable at what price.
314531
Branded always is better - coz they're better in performance and support is assured. But if u can manage with lesser performance and your own maintenance - just go for Assembled
1181905
From what i've seen, there doesn't seem to be a whole lot of difference between them, i suppose try to get value for money. Whichever provides the most for the least.
2815
Reports that "provide an up-to-date record of commitments and expenditure within budgets so that unexpected over/under run costs do not result, ensuring that all transactions are properly recorded and authorised and, where appropriate, decisions are justified."\n\nAccording to the site I found:\n\n"Reports show cost forecasts for each approval stage, supplemented by evidence that costs achieve value for money – that is, they reflect the most economically advantageous price compatible with the specified quality; reports provide an accurate and timely summary of full and proper accounts that monitor all transactions, payments and changes relating to the project."\n\nThe site also says that reports contain:\n\nCost center code/description\nApproved budget\nExpenditure to date\n% complete\nEstimated final cost\nVariation + or (-)
105344
ROI (return on investment).\n\nThe best statistic to measure the effectiveness of marketing is incresed sales.  The delta (increase) in your sales divided by your marketing costs = ROI.
580579
Better Buissness bural
1025280
With as cheap as components are, it's easier just to build a new machine.  If you are not sure how, there are many articles on the internet and it is quite easy for anyone.  It would probably be a cheaper to build a new machine to your own specs then to upgrade out of date components.  Typically the performance upgrade you would get would not be worth the money spent.  Check out www.newegg.com for components.  I build high end gaming and server platforms form medium sized enterprises and have used newegg on many occasions.
530861
THE BRAND NAME AND PRICE.\n\nSG IS MORE WORTHY TO ITS COST.\n\nOTHERHAND KOOKABURRA IS MOST EXPENSIVE TO ITS PERFORMANCE.