Woulden't the streets be a little bit more safer with National Guards patroling as well?
968155
I forgot the name for the act (posse commo tas? I think), but you can't use US troops to police the cities unless martial law is declared.  I am a Solider and I don't want to have to be the police or police our own cities.  We don't have an Army to protect us form ourselves.  My oath is to defend the United States against all enemies, both foreign and domestic and to the Constitution.  Not to police the streets.  We are trained to fight wars, not to be police.  You would not want the mentality of a warfighter to respond to a domestic disturbance, not a good combo.
432461
If you're talking about new government placed camera's so they can see just about everything, bad idea. They should only be placed where they are absolutely neccessary for national security, and actually be for national security. Placing cameras everywhere would be of significant cost, and we can't even make sure everyone is fed yet.
562782
Because of 911, we need to protect ourselves.  You didn't specifiy which border, but I think all borders should be protected by troops. (...all 4)of border police.\nI like the idea someone had of helping our neighboring countries improve their livelihoods so people would prefer to  only visit us.
880349
It is so much safer having a police officer living in the neighborhood. the only people who wouldn't want them living in their neighborhood is someone who is doing something illegal and fears that the police officer will find out.
899613
hi, you don't expect the neighbourhood streets as recreational public space and social because i think its one's ego that never lets us take an initiative step towards the betterment of society(we all know the society needs to be reformed). So open up with your neighbours. coz the bible says "love thy neighbour".\n\nchao.
837384
Yes.  That's a great idea.  In the name of Homeland Security we'll put a trakin chip in evry Amerrcan so they cant get lost an get away.  Of course it'll be for the war on terr, cuz we'll just wave our wand at crowds an those not showing any sign of a chip will be quickly arrested of be a terrist.  That wuld be great an a lot easier for us to spot the terrists!
1160850
There are other places that need the money too to protect them as well.  I mean 9/11 was a tragedy and many miliions have been spent to rebuild and secure NY in the last 5 yrs or so, but how much security does one place need really?  Once you have the cameras, the security guards, and other equipment, ou don't need to spend millions more buying the same stuff.  DO you?\n\nIf we put all of our resources into a few spots across the country it leaves many more at risk to protect only a handful of cities and towns.\n\nI don't know, but I think that over the history of man kind, there have been many different ruling countries in the world that have fallen at some point.  Is it our turn now?
59987
if you are safe and secure, no
818479
Yeah but I think it would be cool to have a new national holiday called NO DRIVING DAY.  One day per year no one could drive a motorized vehicle except for police, fire and ambulance.\nIf you had to get somewhere, you had to walk or ride a bike.  \nIt would give perspective of how good we have it and what politicians/city planners have to deal with.
116955
Funny how other people think my neighborhood is the worst of its kind but I do things that would leave me vulnerable to attacks all the time. I never once witnessed an actually safety hazard set in motion. There are gang members for certain in our neighborhood because tagging goes on alot and is such a nuisiance. Our city is starting to develop to a middle class society though, more and more houses are being built and the environment is starting to look cleaner. When I was young however, my city was definitly a "ghetto" if not worse.
873683
I don't think a defense against terrorists, that is based on protection alone, would work, and the other option, that of only attacking the terrorists overseas, is not very effective either. a mixture of aggressive and protective measures is the optimal approach.
901339
of course. we want to be secured that we won't be hurt. no one wants to get hurt anyway,
37014
I recently heard a soldier say that it was to bulky for him to move freely out in the field. I have seen police wearing it and it does look bulky however they seem to get around okay. I don't think police do anywhere near the amount of walking, running, or combat. I do have a hard time understanding why they can't make the hummers safer though.
371565
It is not at all dangerous outside the cities. Probably more safer.\n\nWe have crime like every country but I think you would find that most people are decent and friendly.\n\nAs a young woman, I feel very safe in this country.
112177
The first 2 answers are ok, but- Road side bombs are a very cheap very effective means of fighting. Like sea mines. Anyway, the U.S. cannot patrol everywhere at once. These people set up the bombs and wait for us to pass. We have to use these main road ways, and they know it.
3176
I am not a Republican, but I play one on TV...:-) Seriously, I believe that they feel trading some freedom for more security is a wise policy.  I understand the need to feel safe, and I am generally in favor of measures that increase our security.  However, that does not extend to the Patriot Act, which I see as a slippery slope away from what America is supposed to be.
955115
I would say, yes, as it gets darker earlier so more cover for ilegal activity whether it be burglary or mugging or any other crime. And for the same reason that some have posted about people being up later in summer I would sugest this being a reason for criminal activity to fall. too many people around to make crime undetected. In winter people will be more likely to be off the streets cosy indoors huddled around the tv. Less witnesses on the street and burgalers can nip into houses that are unlit as it's fairly certain nobody is in.\n\nCan't do that at 8pm in the summer as no-one has their lights on anyway. How would they tell if someone was in or not.