Please rate Brian Jones, Mick Taylor & Ron Wood in order of talent & importance to the Stones.?
954296
The order you have is perfect. Brian formed the Stones. It was his band... but he liked the drugs a little too much. Mick Taylor's playing definitely challenged Keith and made him better. Hell look at the run of albums they made when Mick was in. Ron I think is just happy to be there to play second banana to Keith. BUT, you listen to his stuff with the Faces and you're reminded how good a guitarist he is/was.
450724
stones hands down,.. don't think there is many that can compare with them... \n\nstryper was a good band,.. just too far ahead of their time with the christian movement,...   \nI just turned my son on to stryper,..
194901
Mick Fowley. Both are legends
295964
No I think bill wyman was the back bone of the stones. HE and charlie held the beat down.
1073308
Nosher\nBig Mick\nKnuckles\nCrusher\nLittle Mick\nManchester Harry
386060
Georrge Harrison\n\nTom Petty\n\nRoy Orbison\n\nJeff Lynne\n\nBob Dylan
777463
You have forgotten some of the very best.\nLemmy out of Motorhead and Roger Taylor from Queen, oh and Phill Collins.
1181347
1) Peter & Gordon\n2) Kinks\n3) Rolling Stones\n4) Billy J. Kramer & The Dakotas\n5) Beau Brummels
633726
I'm a classic rock kind of girl myself, but there are PLENTY of bands out there today that are worth looking into. Some of my personal favorites are Dave Matthews Band, U2, Radiohead, and the foo fighters. You can also take into account the older bands that are still touring and releasing albums, like the Stones.
1094505
Pearl Jam\nBeastie Boys\nSublime\nBob Marley & the Wailers\nThe Beatles\nNot in any particular order
103625
Most people would say No as to the Who.  The Who were better than the Dave Clark Five, but still . . .  \n\nIn the 70s the long standing debate was between the Rolling Stones and the Beatles.  People would duke it out about that one.\n\nBrian Wilson wrote some amazing songs, though the beatles catalog overall is better than the Beach Boys.  The Beatles had amazing talent in Lennon, McCartney, and Harrison.  Brian Wilson had to do it all by himself, he pushed the envelope.
350838
not in the history of rock.the answer would be very simple JOHN BONHAM
169666
Stones. Because they sounded like a band.  It was guitars, bass, drums, and vocals.  No contrived backup track or a 30 piece gospel choir to make it sound right.
1027957
The rock ofcourse and yeah also the undertaker they are the best!!!!!
116899
They were so desperately needed at the time.  I was very young the first time I saw them on the Ed Sullivan show.  They were rebels-long hair and rock & roll.  They were overwhelming-they blasted the USA and we loved 'em for everything they were and everything they were going to be.  Even when they dived into the drug world they still had very real and very serious things to say that no one else would.  They were and remain the best without peers.
446796
Bruce Dickinson\nor \nRonnie James Dio\nor\nRob Halford\nor\nGeoff Tate
422870
Neil Young, Bob Dylan, Talking Heads, Crosby Stills & Nash, Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin, Paul Simon, Tom Petty, Rusted Root, The Band.\n\nNeil Young is my TOP CHOICE!!