What is ONE RIGHT Guaranteed in the US Constitution that is being denied to...?
968899
There aren't any. Your implicit point is correct.
92500
The 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as interpreted by the courts, guarantees that:\n\n1. individuals will have freedom of religious expression; \n \n2. the government and its agencies will not recognize one religious faith as more valid than any other faith or secularism; \n \n3. the government and its agencies will not promote religion above secularism or vice versa. \n\nThis is what the Constitution guarantees. I agree with a lot of the current decisions out there that separate religion and state. Granted we maybe a majority Christian country, but one of our rights as a US citizen is not to be forced to partake in those cermonies. I do believe in tolerance for religion though. I believe that anyone can practice their religion in public as long as they do not force anyone else. And as long as no government official or program explicitly promotes any religion. The first amendment forbids that. You can read it below. Along with a quote written by a Supreme Court Justice.\n\n\n"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." (First Amendment)\n\n\n\n"When the government puts its imprimatur on a particular religion it conveys a message of exclusion to all those who do not adhere to the favored beliefs. A government cannot be premised on the belief that all persons are created equal when it asserts that God prefers some." Supreme Court Justice Harry A. Blackmun in the Lee v. Weisman ruling, 1992.
417783
what rights do they not have?
1099988
Sorry to disagree with matt above me here but the Constitution does not "give" us anything. The founding fathers believed that all men are born with certain unalienable rights, but if you are born or  become a U.S.A. citizen then these rights cannot be taken away from you without due process. Now to the question at hand. Yes we now live in a time were the GOP are taking away rights without due process Example: Patriot Act, Freedom of Information Act...  What can we do? I don't have that answer, if I did I would run for office myself.
60597
a constitutional ammendment.. very unprobable... \nthere are several ways to initiate the process for ammending the constitution, none of which are likely on this or any other issue.
1126740
One other guy was close when he said that the supreme court gave some certain rights to this. But the  problem is some states took that too far.\n\nI read over some of the answers and either ppl didn't understand your question or their states don't do what you are referring to. Mine does so I get it.\n\nBottom line: they should NOT have this right. I agree with you completely on the right of passage being interfered with.
439102
The constitution does not say that only citizens are protected by the 4th-8th Amendments, it merely says, "no person." You would want to be given the same rights of citizens if charged in another country, wouldn't you? In fact, the public tends to get up in arms, even when someone IS given the same rights and is given a harsh punishment.
65986
Of course our rights stem from the Bill of Rights which amended the Constitution.  However, and more importantly, our rights are preserved by the "Rule of Law" and that depends on our Court system being independent of Congress or the Whitehouse.  Many countries had constitutions, lawyers and elections but lost their freedom when they lost the rule of law.  Nazi Germany is a good example.  I know of investors who shy away from investments in Russia today because they doubt that the rule of law there will protect their rights.  perhaps things will change for the better.
546447
The US Constituion say no but not only that it is one of those unalienabel rights that have been endowed by our creator.  The hand of big government can slap anyone so I say challenge the cult of the omnipotent state.\n\nIn Liberty,\nEric H. Smith
105967
not without a warrant, 4th ammendment:\n\nThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
309636
1. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution states: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed . . . . U.S. CONST. amend. VI.\n\n2. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution states: "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press . . . . U.S. CONST. amend. I.\n\n3. See U.S. CONST. amend. VI.\n\n4. See Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 565 (1980).\n\n5. See id. at 565-75.\n\n6. See id.\n\n7. Id. at 571.\n\n8. The framers of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were aware of the potential clash between the First and Sixth Amendments. See Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 547 (1976) ("[I]t is inconceivable that the authors of the Constitution were unaware of the potential conflicts between the right to an unbiased jury and the guarantee of freedom of the press.).
989801
The Constitution of the United States of America, states that the people have the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.  It is a right added to be a stop gap measure for the people to protect themselves from a corrupt government intrusion.  Due to the fact that at the time the King of England forced the colony folks to house the British soldiers, and were not able to stop them from unreasonable searches or siezures.  Our founding fathers determined that this was a violation of man's basic freedoms.  Not to be usurped by wicked men.  The right to be free from harm or intrusion was based on the unalienable rights granted to mankind by God.  This was codified in the Constitution for our protection and for our benefit.  It is up to us who live by it, to make sure it stays in force!  When we choose to allow it to be usurped we have effctively let the documnent become nothing but words on paper that are useless.
154570
No, there is nothing in the Constitution that says one person can make another person consent to sexual relations. \n\nQuite the contrary, the constitution gives us the right to be free in many, many ways.\n\nIf you're having sex with someone that doesn't want to have sex with you you're committing rape.
468612
All the rights guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution.
569214
Who else out there believes that the Constitution of the United States is wrong?
741490
See US Constitution:  Bill of Rights.\n\nAs written, not as perverted by activist justices.
123214
i don't think there is one.   Just read it.  If this is for school, I would focus on the amendments.