Does the Spear of Destiny really exist? Do you think it had anything to do with Holocaust?
957372
The only spear of destiny that exists is your own. To the extent of murderous campaigns or genocide, that's not destiny, but intolerance and inhumanity (or lack) that exists within. On that note, we most look at the literal millions of war fares, suffering and injustices from the beginning of time.
218238
Well, did it really happen? Its unacceptable because it lends credence to the billion dollar holocaust industry. Frnakly most of the hjolocaust garbage has been proven false. Lechter did it when he performed the first foensic test on the so-called gas chmbars and found no evidence of Zyklon B which has a residue life of 300 years as non evident in the so-called chambers.\n\nForensic evidence is good enough to execute people in America for alleged crimes but it becouse junk science when used to debunk the holocaust myths. Lechter was not the only one to perform forensic scinec on the so -called gas chambers . read the links below and find the real truth for the cover up of the billion dollar holocaust industry.\n\nFact is history has proven it never happened. Laws in certain contries make it a crime punishable by up to 3 years in jail for holocaust denile. Ifthe holocaust is so evident then why are there laws protecting any questioning of it? IT is a crime in some of these countries to even defend ones self from holocaust denile and a lawyer can be charged also if he submits any evidence to debunk the holocaust. IT a win win situation for the Jews in charge of this phony court in certain countries. It s insane and has the mind of a delusional mentally defunct government under the control of mentally ill government.\n\nShinlers list is listed in the Library of Congress as "fictional" yet the Jewish media in America tout it as truth. Anne Frank only wrote about a chapter and a hlif of her diary and the rest was peened by several (6-10) other unknown peoples. This would most certainly make one believe the diary is a fake and at most a fable or myth perpetrated by unknown people to support a holocaust.\n\nToture is never acceptable that is why most of it is amyth and is documented as such. That is why it never happened and most of what we hear about the so-called holocaust is pure propaganda.\n\nRead the links below and begin to learn to question the greatest hoax in all of history. Why is it a hoax? Because if it were discoverd as such it would destroy the billion dollar industry that most of its perpetrators of mis-truth rely upon for their own survival. \n\nHowever, and intelligent human would be able to decide for themselves so it is imparative to learn both sides and form ons own opinion. Read the links below and learn how history is distorted and changed to bennifit a few.
95976
While basically true, in most countries (excepting the US), the numbers have been revised downward numerous times since the end of the war. In fact, the official memorial to the Aushwitz dead now stands at just over 400,000 killed, much lower than the original official estimate of 1.5 million. While a tremendous number nonetheless, this also includes prisioners of war, homosexuals and other folks found disagreeable to the nazis. There are numersous groups that claim that the holocaust numbers have been bloated and used for jewish goals, but there is no doubt that massive killings - or at least massive deaths occurred. \nIn situations such as this, where there are great political gains and losses at stake, keep in mind that even events filmed yesterday and witnessed by people are put to dispute. The events of the war, of the holocaust and the secrecy surrounding the entire thing are almost six decades old. Everyone involved, whether present then and recounting those events or involved in retelling them now, have a stake in those claims. No one is unbiased.\nAdditionally, in every country in which these events occured, disputing them is a crime. Simply questioning them can be labled disputing them. It remains in doubt that the 'truth' will ever be known. Perhaps the only real 'truth' to what happened will be in reading and gathering as much information from as many sources as you can find, deciding which sources and information are credible and forming your own opinion.
956233
I am not anti-semetic, however Isreal is using the same genocidal tactics against the indigenious people of the area they have conquested, that were employed upon them by the Nazi's in WWII. The Jewish state had not been in existance for 2,000 years, then one day they arrive in force and begin seizing land and killing off the people of the land. They should be included in the axis of terror, however becasue of the Judeao-Christian influence in America they are considered to be full filling the biblical phrophecy. I reject the Bible as does monst of the world as a work of historical fiction with over tomes of a superior race. What they are doing is racism,, it can not be excused.
318062
Here's a link for a good site if you want to research it.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust
1175867
A necessary note from Pablo. \n\nWhere is the Ark of the Covenant? The Ark of the Covenant mysteriously disappeared 2,500 years ago. Amateur archeologist Ron Wyatt claimed he found it. It is important to realize that three of Ron’s many discoveries are widely accepted: \n\n\nThe Turkish government has officially proclaimed that Ron Wyatt found Noah’s Ark. \nIsraeli tour guides take visitors to the site Ron Wyatt identified as the sites of Sodom and Gomorrah where the cities, although turned into ashes, are still visible. \nAnd most investigators believe his discovery of Mount Sinai in Saudi Arabia, as well as the site of the crossing of the Red Sea by the children of Israel. \n(Necessary is to say that lately some immoral "investigators," in order to make money through their books and videos, have attempted to appropriate for themselves these last two discoveries by not giving proper credit to Wyatt when they make their presentations of it). (For some evidences of Wyatt's discoveries see links at the end of this article) \nNotwithstanding all the above validated discoveries, many so-called "skeptics" — Christians and not — still doubt Ron’s claim that he found the Ark of the Covenant and go to all extremes to deny it. Why? Because its acceptance would entail too many serious consequences for many uninformed Christians unconsciously affected by the all-encompassing Replacement Theology, for rabbinic Judaism, for all pagan religions of the world and for Evolutionism. In other words, its acceptance would deeply revolutionize the fabric of human society due to its "disturbing" spiritual ramifications. Therefore, Satan will use any and all his minions in order to try and stop the information on this page to be publicly known, and most of all accepted. Read on, and let the Spirit of the Almighty tell to your heart and your mind what the truth is. I know that his truth can make you free — or freer. \n\nPablo \n\n\n\nThis article describes in detail the most amazing and important discovery ever made in Archeology. The finding of the Ark of the Covenant by a Christian amateur archeologist, Ron Wyatt — a real Indian Jones — in 1982. Here you will find out why you might have never heard of it before despite of its proven reality. In this description there are many things that are amazing enough as to leave the blockbusters of Steven Spielberg deep in the dust. The reality and significance of what Ron Wyatt discovered in so fabulously mind blowing that only God, the ultra-imaginative Creator of the Universe could ever had conceived the most portentous element in this discovery. If you have Christ in you, be advised, you will cry. I did. It is also necessary to say that Wyatt made his phenomenal discoveries (this was not the only one, here you will read about several in connection with the sacred Ark) by strictly following the indications given in the Bible and by tuning with God in prayer. He proved that God uses those less likely to do His work on this earth ... and the results are awesome that lead to you bow and worship Him who has no equal in Eternity. To Him all Glory. To Wyatt thanks in Heaven. And to you a huge surprise lies ahead. Read on. \n\n"For nothing is secret,that shall not be made manifest; neither any thing hid, that shall not be known and come abroad."   Lucius (Lukius, Luke) 8.17 \n\n\n\nIntroduction To The Discovery\nRon's Studies\n\n\nWhen Ron Wyatt returned to America after his unusual experience in Jerusalem, he studied the Bible closely, noting the last time the Ark's location was mentioned. He discovered it was when King Josiah of Judah wanted to reform the country, "Moreover Josiah kept a Passover unto the Lord in Jerusalem; and they killed the Passover on the 14th day of the first month. And said unto the Levites that taught all Israel, which were holy unto the Lord: 'Put the Holy Ark in the house which Solomon the son of David king of
208838
The Swastika was a symbol used by the Nazis. The Nazis were responsible for the holocaust. The Holocaust killed millions of Jews (as well as other ethnic groups).\n\nHowever, at the same time the Swastika is a rather old religious symbol that the Nazis adopted, thus it isn't unusual to see it on old religious artifacts. For example, in Roman times the Swastika represented the sun moving across the sky and was a symbol of Sol Invictus (a god).
728036
The same can be said of the Exodus. There are no records of a massive Jewish migration out of Egypt by Moses. Christians claim, erroneously, that the Egyptians never documented a bad policy and would never document losing thousands of slaves.\n\nInterestingly enough though, maticulous records from granaries show no excessive shortages or surplus, which would support the Exodus story...\n\nIt's a book. 5% philosophy, 73% theology, 22% assorted smut and violence. 100% fiction.\n\nIncidentally, for the guy above me, that occurance was off by about 5 years. The phenomenon you are referring to happened BEFORE the birth of Jesus in the historical record.\n\n-SD-
558925
First, if you are going to try to raise a fundamental question about the authenticity of anything, try to do it in good English.  I hate having to wade through bad grammar and poor sentence structure in order to delve someone's meaning.  And second, if you are referring to that tired old argument about the holocaust being fake, then you are barking up the wrong tree.  The Holocaust happened and there is nothing you or your deluded friends can do about it.  I suspect that you know this and are just using it to stir up sentiments about something about which obviously you know nothing.
1053149
why holocaust is not a legend? there isn't any approved evidence about it. so we shouldn't approve its a legend who believe in it should approve it's true. but in my idea I think Hitler was a mad man and he might do any stupid crime but not as many people as they say. I can't believe these statistics and also it's very strange why some countries pay a lot of attention to Holocaust and governments which always state that there is democracy in their country and everybody can say what he want send to jail who deny and talk against it. It's very doubtful.
978140
Never heard of such a thing. Are you sure? Where is information on it. That's like Jewish nazis, or a Native American republican.
694757
I suggest you guys try and ignore this mouthbreather.  He asks the same questions on Judaism over and over again, with slightly different (though consistently biased and misleading) wording. If you don't believe me, all I can say is that you can verify this for yourselves.  I sincerely doubt that he is here to learn anything, at least in this area (though I feel obliged to at least commend him on his appropriate choice of screenname).\n\nThis guy's online hobby is something called Jew-baiting.  So don't take the bait, as it were, by responding on his terms and lending legitimacy to his line of questioning (which is shallow and insensitive at best, or, more likely from what I've seen, deliberate bigotry).  He has a real problem with Jews.  I don't know if it stems from a negative personal experience with Jews, or if he was raised by klansmen, or what.  But he keeps asking these same questions, and when confronted with information that contradicts his assumptions, he becomes belligerent and disregards the new information anyway.\n\nI once explained to him that he was mistaken in his assertion that a Jew had to have "Jewish blood" because conversion has a history going back through biblical history, all the way to the first Hebrew himself.  This did not sway him in his irrational belief.  And if someone here were to point out that calling Judaism a "cult of ancestor worship" is inaccurate because\n\na) it's not considered a cult\n\nand\n\nb) worshipping anything other than G-d, one's ancestors included, is the most severe form of blasphemy according to Judaism\n\nI highly doubt this gentleman would be swayed on either point.  My advice is not to waste your time.  There are plenty of people on here asking questions about Judaism because they actually want to learn.  If you are qualified to answer, answer those people.  They'll actually benefit from it.
512272
At first this question offended me.  I suspected a touch of anti-semitic bias.\n\nThen I went on the web to look at some facts regarding the number of non-Jews who were also victims of the holocaust.  The facts lend legitimacy to the question.  There may have actually been MORE non-Jews killed in the death camps.  \n\n(For a quick read on this, go to the Wikipedia link below)\n\nSo, back to the original question..."Why is it that we only hear about the Jews killed in the concentration camps?"  \n\nMy guess is that they exist both as a homogenous group (Jewish) and as a nation (Israel) that is a close ally of the U.S.  All through the cold war years when we were writing our version of the history of the holocaust, many of the non-Jewish populations that were affected had fallen behind the iron curtain (Poland, Hungary, Romania, etc.).  For nearly 40 years the interests of these people and the stories of how they too suffered at the hands of the Gestapo were not foremost in our national awareness and empathy (let alone our textbooks). \n\nOther under-represented victims included the mentally or physically disabled, homosexuals, Jehovah's Witnesses, Communists and political dissidents, trade unionists, Freemasons, and some Catholic and Protestant clergy, many of whom were also persecuted and killed.  All of these were also less politically viable after the war or were also victims of our own ignorance and bias here in America.\n\n\nTo sum up, I don't think that there is some "devious plan" to manage the perception of the holocaust as an exclusively Jewish persecution.  I think that the rest of the various (and many) groups that were targeted simply didn’t engender anything like the unified outrage of the Jewish community and the state of Israel. \n\nGood question…made me think.
263875
I am taking a holocaust class in collage. The way I understand it is that Hilterand the germans blamed the Jews for everything. Losing the war, denying Jesus Christ, and they had the best shops and house that money could buy. He had that took from them. To help u out a little more go to www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org. If u have more questions e-mail at Njacobs7477@yahoo.com, I will be glad to help u.
158586
He was a professor of History (as I remember it).  Who happens to be one of those people who deny the Holocaust.  He has been for a while, I guess he just did it in the wrong place this time.
505945
Of course, when items are misquoted, misunderstood, taken out of context or invented, anything goes.\n\nWhy don't you admit that you're nothing but an anti-semite, low-life NAZI lover.  These so-called quotes are very popular on neo-nazi websites, like the ignoramouses who post them would have any knowledge of what is actually written in the Talmud.
152669
I remember that disgraceful persecution of David Irving - an honest, unprejudiced, truth-telling man.  The Jews nailed him - he even had a Jewish judge deciding the case.\nRead his book about WW11 "Churchill's War" - it's straight reporting too.\nBy the way, the best book on the so-called Holocaust is "The Great Hoax", written about 20 years ago by a completely unprejudiced American who researched the subject for 10 years and wrote a very thick book - by far the most complete examination of the topic.  His conclusion was that a maximum of 150,000 Jews were killed in the whole of Europe during the Hitler time, in one way or another - certainly not by gassing.  Unfortunately I can't remember his name.  Can anyone remind me and say if this book can still be obtained : it's high time this whole thing was sorted out, don't you think?