Is there any scientific evidence of a higher being?
960926
Yep.  It's called metaphysics.\n\nWhy do you think Einstein introduced his 'fudge factor' in his first Theory of Relativity?  Because he didn't like the metaphysical implications of the truth.  Fortunately, his contemporaries called him on it and he 'fixed' it and won the Nobel prize.\n\nSaid differently, if E=MC (squared), then energy can be converted into matter and vice versa.  The necessary implication is that neither can come from nothing, which is scientific evidence of there being something supernatural that created the known universe.  \n\nI call it God.  What do you call it?
372959
look around you, can you testify the existance of GOD and the universe?
1095622
Probably it is human nature to try to find an explanation for everything. Before the establishment of science the most simple explanation was that since things such as fire, lightning natural phenomena were beyond human abilities, they were the work of something superior-the gods. So I guess it is partly a remrant from those times\nAlso I think it is in human nature to believe in something superior, because it fuels hope. Finding "evidence" for the existence of such a power reassures you that your hope is not in vain.\n.
503263
This is the age old conundrum.  Does God exist?  Is God male or female?  Is it an energy force?  Einstein said our minds are too feeble to understand something that is so complex.  So, be a good person and just stand in awe of everything and you will find out soon enough when you die.\nBut, until then, there is no scientific proof that any God, or supernatural Deity exists in our known universe.  We have the four forces of the known universe to keep us busy for a long time.
17849
ID by ET?  Possible.  But the best scientific evidence so far suggests life evolved here on this planet through natural selection.  Now, however having said that, it is entirely possible for some outside intelligence (God, other divine beings, or ET) to interfere and "nudge" evolution along on a certain direction.  The only drawback to that concept is it's hard to prove or disprove.  However I personally think that the universe was put on auto-pilot mode by a higher intelligence long ago, and that this Intelligence interferes only occasionally or will interfere indirectly (ie: through natural or manmade occurrences) in response to prayer. \n\nHowever, talking about that website specifically...do the Raelians have hard evidence to support their claims?  I would ask for some before I would believe their claims.
956118
OK - I don't have a religion. And I don't see what your question has to do with the title of your question. Religion doesn't play into the 5 'Entities' that you listed. So not quite sure where you are going with this but.... \n\nI am quite content to say that there is currently no answer to your question. If I could explain it - I should be paid many big bucks for the answer as it seems your question is one of those that is unexplainable, and one that scientists labour over daily.\n\nWe might never know. But in the same respect, I do not believe that a 'Higher Being' is necessarily the only other option to natural causes of life on this planet or the universe.\n\nI suspect that 'Intelligence' IS the basis and foundation of molecular biology, not separated from the article, not an outside force. Why do we need to personify that intelligence? In whatever form it exists - unlocking that intelligence will be a task-and-a-half.
452041
Science deals with the natural world.  It cannot prove the existence of the supernatural.\n\nHowever... science, rational thought, and logic can disprove the existence of some god or gods.  For example, Zeus and his cronies were supposed to hang out on Mount Olympus.  We can concretely say that Mount Olympus is not the home of the gods.  We have disproved the greek gods.  Likewise, you can logic and reason to disprove the christian god.  However... most people have a blind spot towards this information.  That's fine.  You can believe in whatever you want... provided you are not a danger to yourself or others.
587895
Yes there is. Have faith & try n call them. Call Ram, Call Krishna, Call Sai. & soon u'll meet sumone who is their follower. Try doin so! They make their presence felt. Have FAITH.\nIts same as asking a proof for air. U cant see air bur can feel it. Same here.
422054
Who's to say there wasn't a Santa clause, Easter bunny, tooth fairy. The only one with actual evidence is evolution. The rest are just stories made up by your parents. No God, no problem
1070273
There is no scientific view.  Plain and simple God spoke it into existence.  The human mind cannot comprehend that.
763236
A good question. There is as much *** proof *** of his existence as there is for all the other deities and pseudo deities.\n\nNote the word *** proof *** here meaning "not what some mortal scribbled down in parchment a few hundred years AFTER the alleged fact, THEN had it translated - several times - interpreted and re-written."
1107508
What evidence might that be?
718570
there can be no absolute scientific proof of reincarnation, and none against it. It is up to the individual whether they take a personal stand or not on the issue…. It’s all about faith. it’s nice to believe in it though; however, this is one of the questions humans will never be able to answer.
1094677
The supernatural, i.e. God.
282072
don't know, don't think anyone knows for definite, but if its a possibility your after then the answer is yeah of course what we perceive is god could be aliens, but then who is there god.
1158121
No.  There is no god.  There's no evidence pointing toward the existence of a god or gods, and no reason to suspect that such evidence just hasn't been found yet.
1150916
The default position for all claims is "false", for the simple reason that there are an infinite number of potential false claims, but only a finite number of potential true claims.  For trivial claims, trivial evidence is sufficient.  But for outrageous claims, outrageous evidence is required to overcome the appropriate skepticism.\n\nUntil gods are proven to exist, it is assumed they don't.  \n\nAre you also an aleprechaunist, or are you willing to admit the concept of leprechauns is ridiculous and reject it outright unless sufficient evidence is found?\n\nDepending on the definition of god you choose, there may be proof of the nonexistence of that deity, but in general, it's not practical to prove a negative.\n\nIf there were any gods, and they cared whether or not you believed in them, don't you think they'd make it obvious instead of depending on ancient rumors?