what is the cause of war between afghanistan and usa?
957951
wrong place for your question  try world politics section
96884
No!  The only reason we are in Iraq is to finish what Bush's daddy couldn't.  If you recall Iraq wan't the origional problem, it was Afghanistan.  Why don't you hear much about the Afghan. part of the war?
965877
The main reason in being in Afghanistan is to be close to China! Let us think that all the wars post WWII we are working on surrounding China! [I do not know the reasons, but I have some ideas!]
294922
http://hotzone.yahoo.com/b/hotzone/20060320/hz_afghanistan_0306/blogs2986
736927
nationalism and religion are the leading causes of war
563619
Osama is there or not only God Knows.But there are many Osamas Fighting for injustice,fighting for freedom fighting for peace in the Afghanistan.The media is controlled by US.So they show everything in one or other way favouring USA.So we cannot see the ground reality.Usama alone cannot do anything.
155919
War can only be declared on a recognized country.  Since Al-Qaeda is not a country, we have not done that.  We did declare war on Afghanistan when the Taliban were there and supporting Al-Qaeda.  We won and Taliban has been pushed out of power in Afghanistan.
179655
After US left Iran in 1978 Russia could invade the neighboring country, Afghanistan, without the United States being able to do much.  Russia wanted to spread communism and secure oil routes.  All part of geopolitical strategy. Read "THE GREAT GAME" by some guy...I forget his name.
499897
The causes of the war were a complex series of events, including slavery, that began long before the first shot was fired. Competing nationalisms, political turmoil, the definition of freedom, the preservation of the Union, the fate of slavery and the structure of our society and economy could all be listed as significant contributing factors in America's bloodiest conflict.\n\nFor more info visit the link below.\n\nAll the best!
482958
The U.S. stands for United States [of America].  That's who.  If your talking about Afghanistan, they deserved it unfortunately.  If your talking about Iraq, they probably didn't deserve it.  And what's wrong with taking over countries in the name of anti-terrorism if those countries governments harbor terrorists?
1039706
Bin Laden was in Afghanistan in about 1987 and began his militia Al Queda about then. It's main purpose was to rid the country of the Russians. Yes he was there and yes he did fight but only toward the end of the conflict.
605320
I heard 250,000 civilians in Iraq alone.  And it's not just Afghanistan and Iraq.  There are other conflicts the U.S. has had a hand in that they WILL NEVER tell you about.  If you think about that sh!t, I don't think you'll want to keep reading what you've been reading.
282184
It is not america that wants war. It is the human nature that wants war.\n\nIt is called balance of power. Today america is the superpower\n\nYesterday ROmans and persians were the superpower, then muslims, then came englishmens, and now americans, \n\nTomorrow it may be communist and after that Hindu's and then muslims again\n\nAllah knows better.\n\nNobody knows what will be there tomorrow, but everybody will be fighting.\n\nSo let us all live with it. Time for america has come.
1123313
what i think is interesting is the war.  It's been awhile since I've read the book, but "we've always been at war with Eurasia"  then it suddenly turns to "we've always been at war with Indoasia(or whatever it was called, like I said it's been awhile).\n\nany-hoot, this reminds me of the war in Afghanistan....we were at war there, then all of a sudden we were in a war in Iraq.  it was like we were always at war in Iraq.  \n\n"Afghanistan?  no, we've always been in Iraq"
995647
What war on terrorism?\nThe United States of America are acting as terrorists themselves  insisting on that stupid war.
496373
Overtly, the US invaded Afghanistan to overthrow the Taliban and find Osama Bin Laden.  Neither of these has yet been completely accomplished.\n\nThe Taliban continues and last month had even made a bit of a comeback.  The conditions, such as the treatment of women, are even worse now than they were at the time of the Taliban.\n\nThe reason is because the Bush administration is full of idoits that don't know how to fight wars.  In Afghanistan, like Iraq, there were far too few troops sent to do the job.\n\nUnlike Iraq, the troops in Afghanistan never intended to occupy the country.  The administration naively believed that the Afghani people would greet the troops as liberators and band together to establish a western-style democracy.  This hasn't happened.\n\nToday, the new Afghani government controls only Kabul.  The rest of the country is in the hands of warlords who are at least as bad as, or worse than, the Taliban.  The Taliban contines to hold some territory as well.\n\nLaws are almost non-existant in Afganistan, and the US has done next to nothing to help.  Kabul still hasn't been rebuilt since the Soviet invasion, and the US has allocated no money to do so.  The "aid" that the US does provide isn't even sufficient to train and maintian the security forces that act as the new government's personal bodyguards.\n\nIf the US left today, it would hardly make any difference.  The number of troops and resources dedicated to Afghanistan is so small that it might not even be noticed of they were withdrawn.\n\nThe handling of this war should be a source of great shame to the Untied States.  The Afghani people were the poorest in the world before the invasion, and now they are even worse off.\n\nAmerica, the richest country on the planet, could easily rebuild the country and could do much to help restore order, but won't.  No reason has been given for this since the American press and people have already forgotton about Afghanistan.
397421
There are 4 primary causes of the US civil war (I'm assuming this is the one you want).\n\n1.  federalism--favouring a strong centralized government as opposed to strong state governments.\n2.  slavery\n3. expansionism--extending control into new territory\n4.  sectionalism--blind focus on the interest of a section or region instead of the whole.