Will federal agents go to any lengths, even outside the law, to get a conviction?
957866
OH! YES! Even judges in Canada they steal victims documents in the courtroom to make sure that people get Criminal Record and does not travel to USA! Because they thinks USA makes money from Canadian tourists! \nList of Corrupt Judges and Lawyers involved in my actions  \nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout/judgtable.html\n\nList of corrupt Police Officers in Toronto & montreal\nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout/pig.html\n\nCanadians' Crimes \nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout/canada1.html\n\nList of corrupt judges and lawyers in Canada\nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout/1dictionary.html\n\nCorruption in Justice System in Canada\nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout/80dictionary.html\n\nLAWSUIT v. Canadian Judges and Lawyers\nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout/conflict.html\n\nINDEX\nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout\n\nTORTURE IN CANADA\nhttp://www.geocities.com/doworkout/section11.html
421204
Call your local court to find out if that is even possible.
1009379
aiding and abedding a fugitive
1064569
you need what is known as cleet certification. that is required by most law enforcement agencies as well as a clean record without felony convictions and the ability to perservere . and praying never hurts law enforcement is one field i will never go back inot to many crooked politics
640802
http://www.universalbackground.com/employment_screening/wants-warrants.asp\n\nThey will do it but it cost money
879404
They can do it because "Craigslist" is not responsible and no law enforcement agency has jurisdiction over crimes committed in "cyber space."  Our concepts of jurisdiction have not yet evolved to encompass acts done where there is no location for the action.  The F.B.I. could probably prosecute, but it is not worth the effort since they would have to find a way to PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt what "100 roses" really meant and what services were really being offered.
1139807
Um, yeah, sure. Just go to your local FBI office and ask them, I'm sure they can help you.
220365
Yes.  But be sure you are not interested in any position that involves security clearance.  If you get married to a felon, it could limit your ability to move up the ranks since it might affect your ability to get approval to do some military tasks.
44773
Everyone's replies are absolutely correct.  I found a page from the FBI site that lists the location of the web site for each state though there may be individual sites for bigger cities.
301864
Call your local law enforcemet office and ask.
218549
I really hope you are joking. \n\nAccording to section 7201 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), it is a federal crime for anyone to willfully attempt to evade or defeat the payment of federal income taxes. A taxpayer can be found guilty of that offense when all of the following facts are proved beyond a reasonable doubt:\n\nThe DEFENDANT owed substantial INCOME TAX in addition to that declared in the defendant's tax return \nThe defendant knowingly and willfully attempted to evade or defeat the tax \nThe prosecution need not show the exact amount of the taxes due, but it must prove that the defendant knowingly and willfully attempted to evade or defeat a substantial portion of the additional tax charged in the INDICTMENT.\n\nIn this context, the word "attempt" means that the defendant knew or understood that he had TAXABLE INCOME which he was required by law to report to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) during the particular tax year or years involved. Nevertheless, the defendant attempted to evade or defeat the tax, or a significant part of the tax on that income, by willfully failing to report all of the income the defendant earned during that year.\n\nDuring an AUDIT, if an IRS revenue agent suspects FRAUD, he can impose penalties himself, or he can refer the case to the Criminal Investigation Division (CID). The CID is part of the enforcement mechanism for the IRS. It is divided into two parts— General Enforcement (for ordinary taxpayers) and Special Enforcement (for unions, organized crime, and cases involving drugs).\n\nThe CID has broad powers. In fact, a taxpayer may not even know the CID is investigating him until the taxpayer is formally charged. The CID takes its job very seriously and conducts extremely thorough investigations. In pursuit of EVIDENCE, CID agents may contact a taxpayer's friends, employer, co-workers, neighbors, and bankers, and spouse. There are CID offices throughout the United States. CID agents are federal investigators who have been trained in law enforcement techniques. Most CID agents are also accountants, and many have earned their CPA.\n\nThe CID may monitor mail and may apply for a court order for a phone tap.\n\nBecause of the many resources it takes to conduct a CID investigation, only a very small percentage of taxpayers or tax evaders are investigated by the CID. The IRS will use the CID only when it has strong implications of serious wrongdoing. Even in these cases, the CID will recommend prosecution only if it has built an airtight case against the suspect.\n\nThe CID will usually PROSECUTE cases it determines are very strong. On the other hand, if the case may generate a lot of publicity, the CID may decide to prosecute anyway. The CID and IRS view high publicity prosecutions against high profile people as being a major deterrent for others contemplating committing a tax crime. The CID also considers the amount of money involved in a tax crime when deciding whether to prosecute a case. The average amount of money owed in most criminal tax cases exceeds $70,000. Once the decision to prosecute has been made by officials in the CID, and the JUSTICE DEPARTMENT accepts the case, the chances of obtaining a CONVICTION are about 80 percent. About half of those convicted will be incarcerated, irrespective of any prior criminal record in their past.\n\nWhen the CID completes an investigation and recommends that a taxpayer be prosecuted for a tax crime, IRS lawyers will conduct at least two stages of before there is final approval to proceed with a prosecution:\n\nAfter the IRS decides to prosecute, it forwards the case to the United States Department of Justice Tax Division in Washington, D. C. Federal prosecutors with special training in prosecuting criminal tax violations review the case and determine whether or not to authorize prosecution. \nIf the Department of Justice Tax Division in Washington approves prosecution, the case is sent to U. S. attorney's office l
991360
felony and conviction.  Most states and the federal government will not expunge convictions, especially for felonies.
553595
There are laws against this, but it still requires a burden of proof, which is hard to come by at times.  Many of these places also work 'off shore' in order to bend the rule and avoid prosecution.
389495
They can go all the way back. certain crimes have no statute of limitations e.g. murder. and when it comes to the governments money, they won't write it off.
587340
go here good luck\nhttp://www.criminaldefenseassociates.com/?referrer=google-federalnew
402939
You may be arrested and be extradited to the jurisdiction where the warrant is.  Or you may have no consequence..depending on the extradition policies of the departments.
148487
http://www.fbi.gov/ can help you out!