Meaningful convorsation.?
958277
talk about something that is interesting...
725426
Individual's Rights, Morality Issues, The Tradition of Marriage (is it between 2 people who love each other, or strictly between a man and a woman?)\n\nI'm not really sure what kind of topic you're looking for, but I hope this helps.
404369
No, as the dictionary says.  But why draw a line?  Fidelity is a moral issue. As I recall some part of one's marriage vow says something about forsaking all others.  Perhaps the following will provide relief from one's concscience. \n\nForsake (v) To renounce; to reject; to refuse. \n\nadultery (n.) Voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a partner other than the lawful spouse.
191069
a short concise and not boring one would do... \n\nLADIES AND GENTLEMENT, I HAVE THE HONOR TO WELCOME YOU ALL ON THIS GATHERING. MAY WE ENJOY OURSELVES THROUGHT OUT... WELCOME WELCOME, WELCOME
457976
romadgo..utter rubbish!...Nothing wrong in common law marriages, I do not live in the US, I am pagan and as a pagan I got 'wed' we had a handfastening ceremony.  Just because its not recognised by law doesnt mean it doesnt work.  Many of my friends live with their life partner, and have kids. A piece of paper doesnt keep you together, love does
390211
Does it matter? \n\nA better question for you to consider is what's the meaning of your life?\nOnce you've answered that, put it into practice.
747699
Question needs to be cohesive.
855671
The truth is yes there is a tie. The marriage vow tells us, "let the two become one flesh.".
708803
Dear Asphire,\nTo enquire, then to be happy with the result is a fortunate outcome. I sincerely trust that life allows you to retain this happy outlook.\nKind regards, Rose P.
763369
Nothing is inevitable. You never know which side a Justice will come down on. I would like to believe they weigh the arguments and then place them in a context of what is allowed by the Constitution. Activist judges ruling by judicial fiat from the bench are not good for anyone, no matter which side of the political spectrum they fall on.
848984
consternoon afterble.
551857
Having an entity that provides a means for one to share their internal personal conflicts is a clever tool. It is easier for one to relive guilt or experss happiness to something they know will remain impartial. E) Is my answer.
512606
Okay, I'm tempted to offer to put you out of your misery.\n\nThis is a big topic and you have to find a meaningful focus. Do you want to talk about the ethical debate? Do you want to discuss the legal issues? \n\nHere's one idea, since it's civics: Look at the one country where euthanasia is legal, Holland, and talk about whether the law there would be a good or bad model for the United States to follow. Is the enactment of such a law desirable? Would it be workable in the climate of the US given the polarization over the abortion issue? Is this something that could be enacted nationally or only statewide, as the mercy-killing law in Oregon. \n\nI've cited a few websites below that could be useful starting points, but you problem need to delve into hard-copy stuff, journals and books.\n\nHope this idea is helpful. Better get going.
298807
Compromise.  Meet in the middle and see how you can both have what you want without giving up too much.
404593
If final means it is completely resolved then I don't think there is much you can do except move foreward. Take the oportunity to reflect on your marriage and learn from the experience. It may help you in your future relationships. good luck.
830073
helpful mainly, decent etc.\n\n:> peace\n.
466539
The NGLTF is a superb resource for data, and is especially strong in its presentations of pro-marriage arguments.\n\nThe Religious Tolerance site is not as well done, but does a good job of including information relating to both sides of the issue.