what three things are jurors told to do?
967635
to be fair & impartial and follow the law
1009752
None of us has time! but... it is your civic duty to participate now and again!  There are specific criteria that will relieve you of jury duty, but you still need to show up and allow the judge to review your petition/request and dismiss you legally.  As far as trying to act like a @#$ a..hole in the courtroom and prejudice your responses, be careful-you can be held in contempt and perjury in a courtroom is very expensive!!
306720
1. act like men   2. act like men   3. act like men
220116
Although rare, the jury can pose questions. However, the questions have to be addressed to the judge. The judge will ask the appropriate person.
3728
No one but a juror may be in the jury deliberation room. This is why it is so important that the judge determine what evidence is admissible before the trial begins. If a juror believes other jurors are considering irrelevant evidence, the juror should inform the judge, who would instruct them of their consitutional responsibility and so forth. If a judge believes a jury did not consider the evidence properly, he/she can vacate the verdict, which is very rarely done, for obvious reasons.
112374
It deals with the right of a citizen to have a trial decided by a jury of her peers.
131733
You must respond for jury duty.  \n\nOnce there you will be among many others, how many depends on a number of factors such as where you live and the type of cases to be tried.\n\nFrom this “Panel” of potential jury members individuals will be selected  through a process of Voir Dire (meaning – to speak the truth).  This is the preliminary examination made of prospective jurors so that the court (attorney questioning) can ask questions of the prospective juror to find out as to things such as competency, interest, knowledge of the parties involved in the case, things like that, and, from these select those they most desire on the final jury.\n\nIt is likely that those in the initial jury panel will not all have to go through this process (most jurisdictions select by lot) and after the jury selecting is complete the remaining people will be excused.  \n\nThose selected will comprise the jury itself and the alternates.\n\nIf a individual has some reason that they cannot attend they can present those reasons to the court.  If these are legitimate reasons that person will be excuse.\n\nDon’t the mistake of just not showing up.  You can be arrested and brought to the court.\n\nServing on a jury is a citizen responsibility and should be entered into willing and with enthusiasm.  It is one way a citizen can participate in the governmental process.  It is the right of our citizens to serve on juries to both judge the facts of the case as well as judge the application of the law, a right we have had since 1215 and the Great Charter (Magna Carta).\n\nThis is a responsibility each citizen should take seriously and gladly.  Those who advise to prospective jurors ways to just not do it, are doing you and your community no favor.
53206
Answer Q, Vote for best answer, rate answers good or bad, have your answer picked as best and after you ask a q, pick the best or put it to a vote.
913131
1)  close your ears.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n2) close your ears.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n3) close your ears.
933903
It can make a big difference how and when a jury hears something.
342109
1. Be kind to everyone\n2. Be fair\n3. Take the time to let someone know you care\n4. Do random acts, it all adds up
574499
The fundamental role of a jury in any case is to be the "fact-finder", meaning that every dispute over a fact gets decided by the jury, while the judge serves to answer disputes over the law.  For example, the judge decides whether a specific piece of evidence is legally relevant to the case and decides whether the evidence gets shown to the jury.  The jury would decide whether the evidence shows that one side or the other is telling the truth and deserves to be believed.\n\nIn a civil negligence case, the plaintiff (person suing) has to prove that (1) the defendant had a duty (2) that he broke, which (3) caused (4) damages.  All four have to be proved.  Usually, in a negligence case, the duty will be to be as careful as a reasonable person in the circumstances, but it can be different.  The third part, causation, can be pretty tricky, too, because effects can have distant, indirect causes (like a car hitting a telephone pole, which tips over, scaring a lady who drops her new vase).  Usually, the plaintiff has to prove his case to the jury by either "a preponderance of the evidence" (at least a little more than half-convinced) or "clear and convincing evidence" (more convinced, but maybe still with some doubts or reservations).\n\nIn a criminal case, a jury has the same fact-finding function as in a civil case.  Because a person's life or freedom is at stake, though, the prosecution has to prove its case beyond a shadow of a doubt, meaning that the jury has a duty to find the accused person not guilty if they have any doubts or reservations.
370024
Dress for success and be very honest, documentation , to support you arguments,look judge directly in eye, when answering questions or addressing the court,try not to be emotional
939823
1) Habeus Corpus\n2) damages\n3) conspiracy
1117266
1. take credit of subordinate's work ... and give bad credit of his/her mistakes to subordinates\n2. be able to sit idle all day while others work hard\n3. be the nightmare of many while having nothing for self
647346
a) don't commit crimes.\nb) good behaviour and get parole.\nc) pay a fine.\nd) request you do 'x' hours of community service. (like that celebrity from LOST who had a DUI and had the option to do 'x' hours of community service or spend 'x' days in jail)\ne) jail break.
413380
ARRAIGNMENT, IT IS THE FIRST TIME YOU SEE THE JUDGE..AND THEY DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT TO ACTUALLY PROCEED WITH THE CHARGES...USUALLY UP TO PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, IF THEY HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE THEY WILL PROCEED IF NOT SOMETIMES THEY WONT. THEN TO TRIAL TO HERE BOTH SIDES OF EVIDENCE BUT BEFORE THAT  YOU DECIDE TRIAL BY JURY OR TRIAL BY JUDGE GO WITH JURY. THEN HOPEFULLY YOUR ATTORNEY WILL FILE MOTIONS TO HELP YOUR CASE SUCH AS MOTION TO SUPRESS EVIDENCE...THEN BOTH SIDES ARE HEARD AFTER JURY IS PICKED...THEN AFTER MANY MONTHS SOMETIMES A YEAR OR TWO VERDICT TIME IF YOU HAVE NOT STRUCK A PLEA BARGAIN....I HAVE BEEN TO TRIAL 3 TIMES AND WON ALL THREE .