Any different ways of wording this?
968197
Food is the only nutrient our body needs and should never be used as a substitute for comfort or a reward.
698404
As\nSee link below, under "As a Conjunction"...:D
433144
Diligo vita ut vos ago\n\nthis was the best i could come up with... good luck!
747699
Question needs to be cohesive.
4705
Give that to Tom and me.\n\nYou can always figure these out by saying "Give that to Tom" and "Give that to me".  You wouldn't say "Give that to I".
1069769
"have not mentioned" is fairly awkward - I would use "You did not mention".\nAlso, it would sound better if you switched around the order of the first sentence.\n"Hereafter" is not in common use, so I suggest you use "From now on".\n\nSo,\n1. In the invoice, you did not mention who had used the vehicle.\n2. From now on, could you please mention in the invoice who uses the vehicle?
248887
can it be exlained in one word?
1083639
please rephrase and give details
145390
Yes.\n\nIt's used in the sentence that you posed as a question.
948361
Nick, the way you have explained your question is confusing to us English speakers! Can you ask someone to translate it, because I think your idea is going to be a good one!
186794
An easy way of establishing it is to see what the sentence would sound like without one or two words in it.  So if you would say 'I went to the game', then 'Doug and I went to the game' would be the correct thing to say.\n\nIf you would say - 'The score at the game affected me deeply as my team lost', it would then be OK to say 'The score at the game affected Doug and me deeply, as our team lost!'\n\nSo if you leave the 'Doug and' bit out of the sentence, then the context will tell you which one you should use.  That also goes if you are using either Doug and I or Doug and me as the answer to a question.  'Who broke the window?' 'Doug and I [did]' - the word 'did' being implied.  However, it's very hard to find a context in which 'Doug and me' would be used.  'Who would like to go to the game?' is usually answered by shouts of 'Me! Me!' when really it should be 'I! I!' as 'I would' is implied, and you wouldn't say 'me would'!  So on a stand alone basis 99.9999999999999999% (recurring) of the time, 'Doug and I' is probably the right answer.
478161
The standard usage is for this to be written as a single word.  Separating the words would create a different meaning.\n\nFor example:\n—My brother has troubleshooting skills.\n—My brother has trouble shooting ducks.
125272
I would have put this under Words and Wordplay, but here is fine.\n\nAs for the question, it really is a question of situation. Contract the two that you don't want emphasis on.
153273
can u please write it more clearer\n? so we could answer....good luck!
602241
COULD YOU REPHRASE THE QUESTION AND BE A LITTLE MORE SPECIFIC?
1159549
I'd say:\n1. What do you want?\n2. Good riddance.\n3. It's all true.\n4. What's up.
816911
If the subsidisation exists and has not yet been given to the school, the first sentence would apply; if the school has been given the subsidisation, you would use the second.\nA better way of phrasing the third sentence would be to use "high"  or "a very considerable amount", in place of "much".