How many cruise missiles did Clinton have fired into Yugoslavia?
964541
This is typically how a shameless coward like clinton fights a war.  From about fifty miles away.  The number of cruise missiles was probably less than a dozen, but even with that he caused an international incident and damn near WWIII.  It seems, Mr Genius and his intel group decided to target a building that his intel people said was one thing, when in fact it was the new Chinese Embassy!  Well the building went down, at least one Chinese diplomatic worker was killed, and the Chinese were madder than hell!  Naturally, slick willie climbed under the desk until the heat was off.  See, that under the desk routine of his, served more than one purpose.\n\nThis, I fear is the management style we can expect from the left.  As the saying goes, "Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it".\n\nTo the genius TOM, below.  I know it's no longer important that over 10,000 Albanians died as the serbs did their repeat of Bosnia, only because that coward clinton overruled everyone about putting boots on the ground.
582829
PERSECUTOR! \n\nMaybe if you hadn't sicced that b*stard witch hunter Ken Starr on our Honorable William Jefferson Clinton, then maybe he could have given more time and attention to the situation in Yugoslavia!\n\nAnother vast right wing conspiracy at the hands of religious zealots who can't appreciate the importance of a good kn*bber! Repent now or burn in hell!\n\nPlease forgive me if I sounded liberal here. Aaron's Pest Control just left and I feel funnnnnny...
726005
Sorry I didn't. I didn't know that Shiites and Sunnis hated each other so much and that everybody hated the Kurds. I guess I should have thought about it since there was one once Tito died and Yugoslavia was broken up into its original pieces. Clinton had to send troops to stop the genocide there. Still, the evil that Saddam perpetrated on people should be taken into account of why the Shiites are so irritated. Sunnis got the better deal while he was in charge.
1081678
About 75 active warheads and about 115 Total.\n\nThis maynot be the latest count.Got the info from a site given in the source column
1116886
Nobody Died When Clinton Died???\n\nAS AMERICANS DEBATE what President Clinton’s legacy should be, too little attention is given to his remarks on Kosovo. The United States launched a war against a European nation largely at Clinton’s behest. Clinton’s war against Serbia epitomized his moralism, his arrogance, his refusal to respect law, and his fixation on proving his virtue by using deadly force, regardless of how many innocent people died in the process.\n\nClinton claimed on March 24, 1999, that one purpose of bombing Serbia (including Kosovo) was “to deter an even bloodier offensive against innocent civilians in Kosovo and, if necessary, to seriously damage the Serbian military’s capacity to harm the people of Kosovo.” The CIA had warned the Clinton administration that if bombing was initiated, the Serbian army would greatly accelerate its efforts to expel ethnic Albanians. The White House disregarded this warning and feigned surprise when mass expulsions began.\n\nYet NATO Supreme Commander Gen. Wesley Clark said on March 26 that the upsurge in crackdowns on ethnic Albanians was “entirely predictable.” Since NATO had no ground forces in the area ready to intervene and since NATO planes stayed three miles above the ground to minimize pilot casualties, NATO could do nothing to stop the surge in ethnic cleansing. Violence spurred by the bombing was quickly invoked as the ultimate justification for the bombing.\n\nThe longer the bombing went on, the more brazenly NATO ignored the limits it had initially imposed on its targets in order to limit civilian casualties. In the final weeks of the 78-day war, all that mattered was finding new targets so that NATO spokesmen could continue their daily bragging about a “record number of sorties flown” and “record number of bombs dropped.” According to Human Rights Watch, at least 500 civilians were killed by NATO bombing; the Yugoslavian government claimed that 2,000 civilians were killed. NATO repeatedly dropped cluster bombs into marketplaces, hospitals, and other civilian areas.\n\nAs Serbian civilian casualties rose, purported Serbian atrocities mushroomed. On May 13, 1999, Clinton declaimed that “there are 100,000 people [in Kosovo] who are still missing” — clearly implying that they might have been slaughtered. Clinton also claimed that 600,000 ethnic Albanians could be “trapped within Kosovo itself, lacking shelter, short of food, afraid to go home, or buried in mass graves dug by their executioners.”\n\nHowever, once the bombing stopped, the Clinton administration was stunned to see the Serbian army withdraw in fine order with polished buttons and good morale. A confidential postwar U.S. military investigation concluded that the damage claims had been exaggerated nearly tenfold. In reality, only 14 tanks, 18 armored personnel carriers, and 20 artillery pieces were taken out, despite the claimed dropping of more than 20,000 bombs on the Serbian military.\n\nSo over 600,000 suffering, 100,000 missing, and thousands dead.
335199
On April 19th, 1993, Bill Clinton and Janet Reno's illegal siege of the Branch Davidian compound was brought to a fiery end. Seventy-six people died that day including men, women and children.\n\nEvery last Branch Davidian brought up on Federal murder charges in the deaths of the Federal agents in the initial raid were acquitted.
157088
Wednesday, July 1st, 1987
2606
Some of these answers humorously try to answer the question.  President Clinton was investigated by Kenneth Starr for a variety of allegations, including sexual harassment allegations brought forth by Paula Jones.  In the depositions Clinton made, he denied under oath that he ever had an affair with Monica Lewinsky, which related to the sexual harassment charges on sexual impropriety.  When it came forward that Lewinsky had physical evidence that proved the affair, Clinton recanted his story.  Starr believed that a four charges had sufficient proof to be legitimate grounds for impeachment: perjury, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, and abuse of authority.\n\nIndependent Counsel Kenneth Starr brought these charges before the House, and the House impeaced Clinton on the perjury and obstruction of justice charges.  The Senate failed to convict Clinton on either charge.\n\nThe Answers.com link below provides a concise summary of the events and justification that led to impeachment.
1071597
Mr Clinton stated that the reason he was sending troops was because Milosevic was committing genocide.  He was right and it was stopped.  Mr. Bush claimed he was sending troops because Saddam had WMD's, was starting a nuclear weapon program, had ties to AL Quada and was involved in 9-11.  All those things were wrong and now thousands of people are dead and the killing continues.  If Mr. Bush would have stated he was sending troops because Saddam was committing genocide, then he would have been right, also.  That's the difference: being right vrs. being wrong.
38378
You're just playing with us Jim; you don't want to nuke anybody anymore than you want them to nuke you. The real question is should we use cruise missiles to destroy Iran's nuclear reactor/s like Israel did with jets back in '81 to Iraq's reactor/s because they were making the bomb too?\n\nAnswer: No to the nukes, Yes to surgical strikes with cruise missiles, which I believe will eventually happen, unless Israel beats us to it!
892623
Maybe not as bad as it is today, but if Clinton would have allowed the missile strikes on Osama, then maybe none of this would have happened\n\nEDIT:  But as we all know, hindsight is 20/20\n\nEDIT2: Awwwww :)
14183
No, but Clinton had a chance to send in special forces operatives to track him down in Afghanistan about 7-8 years ago and he refused because he didn't want to commit ground troops. So instead he bombed an aspirin factory. He had a chance to avoid a lot of pain and suffering.
230059
I think this is it:\nhttp://www.senate.gov/~clinton/news/statements/details.cfm?id=249019
1082791
They purportedly have missiles with the proper range to hit targets on the west coast.  Alaska, BTW, is well within range.
1046226
Absolutely.  I think we do the same exact thing Reagan did to Libya.  We send 1 ICBM with a conventional war head to the missile site and 49 others to the personal residences of the dictator in charge.  Usually that gets the point across....It did with Libya.
706253
FFS!! Here it is, yet again...\n\nWho lied??\n\n"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998. \n\n"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."  President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998. \n\n"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." \nMadeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998. \n\n"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."  -  Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 \n\n"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." \n    Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998. \n\n"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."  \nRep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998. \n\n"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."  \nMadeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999. \n\n"There is no doubt that... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." \n    Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001. \n\n"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." \n    Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002. \n\n"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." \n    Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002. \n\n"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." \n    Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002. \n\n"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and developing weapons of mass destruction." \n    Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002. \n\n"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." \n    Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002. \n\n"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."\n    Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002. \n\n"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop n
607
Agni Missile \nAstra Missile \nBrahmos (Collaboration with Russia) \nTrishul \nPrithvi Missile \nNag Missile \nAkash \n\n\ndetails can be found at the source site