Do you think Nancy Pelosi really means what she said?
961523
Well, the problem is -- until these people have actually been charged with and convicted of some crime, she can't just remove them, absent a supermajority vote of the House.\n\nImproper conduct for a judge may be nothing more than a violation of a judicial ethical rule, and could be something as simple as allowing the appearance of impropriety. It can happen where the judge has never broken the law or even never actually done anything unethical -- just the appearance is enough to remove the judge sometimes. But just that appearance is not grounds for forcibly removing an elected official from office. They need to actually have done done something illegal, generally at felony level.\n\nAs far as the guy who had cash in his freezer, that's suspicious but not illegal.
396409
the word is LYING. no answer to the dumb question though. \np.s. i'm a republican and i could find more incriminating quotes.
912923
Depends. Do you agree with what her side is saying as the truth?
803940
Scary isn't it.\n\nWell, we will find out today if this is the type of person America wants representing them as Speaker of the House. \n\nShe also believes in:\n\nEntitlements for the poor paid by high taxes. She plans on raising taxes, all taxes not simply overturning the Bush tax cuts. Which, by the way, included tax cuts that saved MiddleClass American families $2,000 a year.  Gone. She wants them repealed immediately. \n\nNancy Pelosi has a strong anti-military attitude. She has voted against every piece of legislation brought before the House to better equipt our men and women serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.\n\n\nLegalized drugs\n\nUnfettered abortion rights (partial birth abortions)\n\nNo parental notification for minors seeking abortions. Not control over whether a minor can actually have an abortion, just notifying Mom and Dad whether their minor child is seeking an abortion.. \n\nRehab not punishment for dangerous criminals\n\nNo border restrictions. She has *invited* illegal aliens to come to San Fransico, they are "welcome".. \n\nAnti-christian values.\n\nPS... Well Map, it is a referendum on Pelosi. If the Democrats win the majority of the House from the Republicans today she will be the Speaker of the House and third in line to be President if something should happen to Bush and Cheney. The type of woman she is DOES MATTER. \n\nIf you want a person like Pelosi to be Commander and Chief of our military then by all means ignore how she would rape the military budget. If you believe that criminals can be rehabilitated and should not be punished, ignore the facts. If you believe that an organization like NAMBLA should be supported by a potential President of the United States, ignore that too. Wake up Map...
777984
I agree, it's like the doctoring of the Osama Bin Laden videos from the Fox networks. Their truth is never real...Democrats have won Congress because of this sort of thing too...Woo Hooo Nancy Pelosi is going to do another "THUMPIN" on G. W. come early 07.
755947
This is a new low even for Maximum Dictator Pelosi.  The current ranking Democrat on the Intelligence Committee is Jane Harman from California, and she is widely respected on all sides.  The Intelligence committee is supposed to be non-political, but that's not good enough for Ms. Nancy, who demands absolute party loyalty.\n\nAnd yes, Pelosi is widely reported to have already told Harman she won't be reappointed to Intelligence.
771297
Not long. Pelosi is tough... she will play Bush's game for a while but she has not forgotten the way Bush refused to listen to any common sense coming from the Democrats.  She will accomplish what they came to do.  Hopefully the stem cell issue will be brought back into the table!
484464
Although she is right in her statement, she might not be making that statement for the same reason you or I would. I think it's her way of saying, "This is a very difficult question to answer publicly without upsetting someone. So please stop asking me or my husband to answer that question."
712640
yea, they are that liberal.  and she is more than them.  thats whats scary.\n\nPelosi is fond of deflecting the “San Francisco Democrat” charge by noting that as a mother and grandmother, she's hardly the left-wing icon figure her critics allege. But there is no denying her voting record over eight terms as one of the most liberal members of the House of Representatives. Pelosi's lifetime rating by the Americans for Democratic Action, the liberal benchmark for members of Congress, is 96 percent. Her lifetime rating by the counterpart American Conservative Union is 2 percent. \n\nEqually relevant are Pelosi's views and voting record on issues directly related to national security and the war against terrorism. Less than a year after 9/11, Pelosi said publicly that she didn't consider the United States at war. This year, she said that national security should not be a campaign issue in the 2006 midterm elections. \n\nPelosi voted repeatedly against the counterterrorism Patriot Act, opposed creation of the Department of Homeland Security and voted against a resolution condemning the leak of the National Security Agency's highly classified program for monitoring terrorist communications. Pelosi also reportedly told colleagues that she would appoint as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee overseeing America's counterterrorism efforts Rep. Alcee Hastings, an ultra-liberal and at least formerly sleazy Florida Democrat. Hastings was impeached and removed as a federal judge by a Democratic-controlled Congress in 1988-89 on bribery and obstruction of justice charges. \n\nA Pelosi-run Democratic-controlled House would also make New York Democrat Rep. Charles Rangel chairman of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee. Rangel says he would oppose extending any of the Bush tax cuts past their expiration in 2010 – imposing a huge tax increase on an economy fueled by Bush's first-term tax reductions.\n\njust to name a few
832065
Pelosi and Dean spread that provocative propaganda to create a stir and regain power.  They knew it wouldn't stand to reason.  The lower level liberals are still feeling the ripples, not realizing that they were used, simply residing at the bottom of the donkey's food chain.\n\nPelosi retracted her demands for impeachment.  They won the election.
699934
Well, some of us Republicans have had fun bandying her name about.  I guess all's fair in love and politics...\n\nShe has an extremely liberal voting record.\n\nIf you look for my Pelosi question (assuming it has not yet been deleted), there are good stats from both parties.
471720
"According to her..."  "In the words of..."
671839
NO NO NO\n\nshe did a lousy job the last time she was in office
487937
I thought Bill used that line. Otherwise there would be no evidence.\n\nWho cares. I call her something you can't say on YA!
798765
She said she was willing and would work with all of the Republicans. If it was just a lie, I hope people see her and the party she has so much power over for what they really are. I understand there are those who just hate Republicans and don't really have a reason, but I am willing to give Nancy the benefit of the doubt.
103637
First of all, I like it when Republicans finally stand up and call liberals on the crazy things that they do (not all liberals,but MANY). However, is this really a question or just a statement ? Although I agree, I can't tell you why Democrats are like that.
821410
WOULD YOU CONSIDER THIS MORE MIS-INFORMATION?::::::::::::::::::::Consider the following votes (all opposed by the vast majority of Americans): NANCY PILOSI VOTING RECORD\nOn July 31, 1996, Pelosi voted against the historic Welfare Reform Bill and later voted against its reauthorization; \nOn July 19, 2006, Pelosi voted against protecting the right to say "one nation under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance; \nOn Sept. 20, 2006, Pelosi voted against requiring that voters be identified so we could ensure only legal citizens are voting; \nOn July 13, 2006, Pelosi voted against requiring English on ballots; \nOn June 30, 2005, Pelosi refused to side with homeowners against the Kelo decision \nthat allows cities to seize private property for profitable ventures,\n even though 365 members voted to stop cities from taking private property. \nPelosi has voted at least 12 times against the death penalty; \nPelosi was one of only 67 House members to vote against the 1996 \nDefense of Marriage Act (DOMA); \nPelosi has voted at least eight times against banning partial-birth abortion, \nat least three times against the Unborn Victims of Violence Act (Laci's law),\n and scored a perfect 100 percent rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America; \nPelosi voted against a bill that would "[b]ar the transportation of a minor girl\n across state lines to obtain an abortion without the consent of a parent, guardian or judge;" \nPelosi voted at least 31 times for using local or federal taxpayer dollars to fund abortions; and \nPelosi received an "F" rating from the National Rifle Association.