What happened in the court case Gregory vs. Chicago?
955633
Petitioners, accompanied by Chicago police and an assistant city attorney, marched in a peaceful and orderly procession from city hall to the mayor's residence to press their claims for desegregation of the public schools. Having promised to cease singing at 8:30 p.m., the marchers did so. Although petitioners and the other demonstrators continued to march in a completely lawful fashion, the onlookers became unruly as the number of bystanders increased. Chicago police, to prevent what they regarded as an impending civil disorder, demanded that the demonstrators, upon pain of arrest, disperse. When this command was not obeyed, petitioners were arrested for disorderly conduct. \n\nThe opinion of the Supreme Court of Illinois suggests that petitioners were convicted not for the manner in which they conducted their march but rather for their refusal to dispense when requested to do so by Chicago police.  However reasonable the police request may have been and however laudable the police motives, petitioners were charged and convicted for holding a demonstration, not for a refusal to obey a police officer.
1100065
Either Google 805 So.2d 952 and rummage through the results, or if you have Westlaw or Lexis you can find it through those services.\n\nAlso, check to make sure your citation is correct.
1097400
a).\n\nBut it's "case AND controversy."
971952
If you could give a case citation, or at least the complete name of the case, the jurisdiction, and the approximate year of the decision, I can read it and give you some idea.  Unfortunately, you didn't give enough information to obtain help.
455469
I think I'll need to employ a gaggle of attorneys to debate and answer this one.  It is far too deep for me.  It did however leave me in stitches too.  Hahaha
143529
go to the courthouse.  It should cost anything to get the basic info.  Also do an internet search of the case and check old newspapers.
205535
I think you'll find all the information you need at this link:\n\nhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=372&invol=335
163790
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/anthony/sbahome.html
26568
You might try a website called Homicide in Chicago 1870-1930.  It features a Crime Commission Report for 1915.  It seems to be a very large and complex research site and features among much more, an Interactive Database where you may be able to pin this information down. http://homicide.northwestern.edu/pubs/ccreport/
89386
Contact the District Attorneys Office for the Supreme Court.\nf the case orriginally was filed where you live, your local DA can find out for you if you were involved in the original conviction.
842172
Ask the clerk of court of the Ramsey County and it is the only way.  What happened in the court cannot be divulged online.
531975
The case is "Pye v. Graham."  It was regarding adverse possession and land rights in the UK.  A pretty thorough recap of the facts and decision in the case can be found at the following:\n\nhttp://www.garywebber.co.uk/propertylawuk/pyegraham.htm
93436
The case is Curley v. NAMBLA.  It hasn't gotten to the Supreme Court as of yet.  As of last year, it was still in the Massachusetts court system.\nTo Izzy06:  They are not protecting NAMBLA, they are protecting A from being prosecuted for the crimes of B if A did not directly incite such actions.  If I ran a gun safety school, and a student of mine killed someone, I would hope not to be prosecuted for the murder.
111144
go to google and type in "sports related cases"
620479
check it out\n\nwww.chicagotribune.com\n\nlol\n\nbig brawl
197760
More info? Small claims, civil suit, jury involved...?
339775
This is a listing of briefs for cases currently on the Docket.  The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR case is an employment discrimination case.  I've also posted a link to the latest slip opinions.\n\nhttp://www.abanet.org/publiced/preview/briefs/home.html\nhttp://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html