i was watching this case on tv about a guy who was been tried for muder and there was no evidence, and he was?
970367
There HAD to be SOME form of evidence.
167319
My guess is that he his guilty, but I have no proof besides theories.
546083
0...has anyone proven him guilty yet? how are we supposed to believe what one book says? if he fails a test, then ill believe it...
977583
Oh yeah.  There is no statute of limitations on murder and the only person ever tried was OJ.
1098556
You can read about it here, though the exact method he used to do himself in is not revealed because police declined to reveal the details: \nhttp://www.bsac.org/news/mayol291201.htm
859200
No! If you pay attention you will understand we are a country of laws not justice. I would rather see 100 guilty go free then 1 innocent be imprisoned. But today it is win at all cost and the people don't seem to care. O.J. is a good example I watched the entire trial and I would have voted not guilty too. Dr. Lee is the leading forensic scientist in the world, and he pointed out people don't bleed blood preservative. Most people in this country talk as if O.J. was found guilty even though the prosecution had no real evidence against him, only tainted evidence. Why didn't anyone follow through with the evidence Dr. Lee presented that said there were other people at that crime scene other then police, and the footprints were much too small to be O.J.? It is a spin of a wheel when you walk into an American court.
867253
You mean his search for the truth has flaws??  It's really hard to believe that idiot could lie to all his followers.  He could have been a preacher, has all the qualifications, I think there's a church in Boulder that's right down his alley.
641554
Guilty! And, yeah, I've studied the case for over a week, so I'm not just saying this randomly. What stuck in my mind the most was they had his DNA! And you know what one of the jury members said? He thought that anyone could have the same DNA... So that was not a determining factor for him... That should really tell you that you want way more than just one college grad. in the jury when you're being prosecuted. There was so much more ridiculous stuff happening in that case! Like the Bronco chase, the money the passports, the note! And why wasn't it admitted? Cause some retards at the gas station it got towed to decided to take pics in it! So, the evidence was contaminated, and I agree it may have been, but imagine all the evidence that was there and was not used for some reason. The racist cop ploy... Man, some of the best lawyers in US couldn't believe when the prosecution lost that case. I guess you can't really stand a chance against the dream team.
1051630
I do not believe your brother was convicted on a "he said she said" case alone.\nI am sure that there was more evidence.\n\nAnd everybody claims that they are innocent.
568418
There was a recent case on the news about a death row inmate who was locked up, but just got out because they proved it was another person who did it.  Robert Blake and OJ were not found innocent they were found not guilty which is two different things.  It means the state didn't meet their burden of proof (beyond a reasonable doubt).  If you are looking for cases which a person with a lot of evidence against them was found not guilty then their is plenty of cases.\nIf I were you I would focus my search on cases were there was lots of evidence, but were set free because of procedural issues.  That area is pretty interesting.
1186456
Because the guy is mentally ill. None of the events/murders you saw ever happened. He was imagining it all because he has mental problems.
7634
I heard this was a rumor from his trip to Mexico. Apparently, however, the suit is still in court and is pending a verdict. The real truths will come out on the stand. Link below is to a TheSmokingGun article describing the suit with filed documents.
754270
It was never explained..he may just be irish in real life
1113
Yes.  He murdered four people in cold blood.  Volumes of evidence were presented proving his guilt.  Even the 9th Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, proven to be the most liberal, anti-death-penalty court in the nation, could not find sufficient cause to nullify the verdict.  He received his fair trial, his fair appeals process.  He continuously professed his innocence to delay (for nearly 30 years) his sentence, nothing more.  He capitalized on the fact that American society, with it's EXTREMELY short attention span, would forget the horrific crimes he committed.  He gambled on the possibility that we would forget what he did, become desensitized to it, and dismiss the jury's decision overly harsh.  Some arguing in his defense tried to portray the jury as a bunch of racist white rich folks intent on "murdering another innocent black man" (it wasn't all-white, check the record).  Fortunately, all of the right people saw through his charade, and ended his shennanigans, permanently.
1172694
WHAT?????? There is something someone is not telling me about them? Did they commit a crime or something?????
284059
You sum it up perfectly, "...they found the rapist not guilty since they couldn't prove it..." \n\nThat is just it. Someone is truely innocent until proven guilty. Unless there is something that proves he knew that she did not want to have sex or there was a witness that saw the act, there is no way to prove it happened.\n\n I would be interested in what book that came out of. Will you tell us? The situation you describe sounds like it would not be an "ignorant" woman, but mabey a woman who was metally handicapped or an invalid. These cases come up from time to time and are a b*i*t*c*h* to prove. The tuely sick  predators rape these types of women.
956485
There's no proof yet, only an accusation.  Or do you judge someone guilty before they've been given an adequate chance to defend themselves?  Give the man a chance to do that.  If he's guilty, then God will deal with him.\n\nThis is just like Satan; he's not called the "accuser of the brethren" for nothing.