use of the word 'would' in grammar?
953049
Will and Would are use to express future events that may happen.\nWill is use if their is a certaintity that the thing you are refering to is realistic.Example: I will go to market tomorrow.\nWould is use if the thing you are referring to is less probable;\nExample: He would like to live in a bed of roses
539906
Why:  Why Not?\nWhere:  Where else?\nWhen:  When else?
773825
http://www.longman.com/ae/azar/grammar_ex/message_board/archive/articles/00179.html\n\nhttp://www.edufind.com/English/grammar/ING3.cfm
767465
I had taken algebra. Past tense.\nI ran versions of both sentence structures thru Microsoft Words grammar checker, and it didn't flag either one.
277156
Please try to check your grammar before posting your question...
659763
Ive wondered that myself, and realized that its in other phrases too like "im going to take a break" so its probably grammatical.  *shrug* who knows for sure
1027312
You can use both, but it's not a question of "subject/verb" agreement!\nIt's linked to "If" as in "If I were you". It's just a matter of feasability of the action (is it very probable or not).\nAs for the "subject/verb" agreement, it has to be "was" because the only subject is "your answer" and if you had to change the end of the sentence by a singular noun "a photo", it'd stay the same!\nHope it helps!
738306
Sally asked her if she wanted to hold.\n\nThe original question was "Do you want to hold?" Which is in the present simple. When reporting speech, I must set my verbs back 1 tense, therefore using the simple past. I used 'asked', because it was a question (and not 'said') and therefore 'want' becomes 'wanted'.
815158
There generally is a pronoun.  It only seems to be used as a \nadverb in older language, eg. Shakespeare, or the bible - "The Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed." — Genesis 2:8\n\nI've never seen it used as a verb.  Anyway, check out these pages -\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There\nhttp://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/there
930918
Can you use it in a sentence?
45776
In what context was the word used?
54153
The first and third are correct. The first is in future tense. Still acceptable depending on context of the sentence.
429649
I = WAS \nYou/they =were \nshe/he/it = was
169277
Bwaaa haaa haaa haa.\n\nDoes someone realy think theyare going toget 10+ pages handed to them for free on a website?\n\nAside from anyhting else with grammar like "What are the importance" you need to do all the research on language you can.
1135224
Your sentence is acceptable, and a native speaker would happily produce it. They may even contract 'Who'd have' down to 'Who'd've' and 'he'd have' to 'he'd've', as you suggest, but they would only do so in speech, not in writing. \n\nWritten English (depending upon the context, of course) tends to be more explicit than spoken English... (unless you're chatting online, in which case many written conventions suddenly vanish.)\n\nThese contractions are likely to be produced verbally (in Australian English) as "hooda" and "heeduv".
1005770
hi..\n\nmight this link v'll help u\n\nhttp://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/one.htm
1004563
Why ~wouldn't~ they?\n\nIf I say, "I am going to the store to buy apples," that is first person. \n\nIf I say, "Mary said there is a sale on apples at the store," that is third person, and a perfectly reasonable way to speak.