don't you think Mr.Bush as similar to Hitler?
962822
NO! Even though Bush's Grandfather Prescott "Poppy" Bush helped fund Hitler, there are major differences. Although what Beach Bum wrote is correct, here are the 8 Key differences: \n\n1. Hitler was elected into power.\n2. Hitler did miliary service in a warzone\n3. Hitler took a broken country and turned it into a world power, Bush is taking a world power and turning it into a broken country.\n4. Hitler tried to eradicate Jews, Bush is selling his nation out to the jews\n5. Hitler masterminded a terrorist attack on his own country (Reichstag fire) and blamed his enemies (the communists) to take radical and dictotorial powers. Bush was kept out of the loop when Cheney organised a terrorist attack on the USA to help Bush get dictatorial powers (which Cheney will exercise through the puppet Bush)\n6. Hitler was very intelligent and had a long attention span.\n7. Hitler was a great speaker.\n8. Hitler loved animals.
1034463
BUsh is not my fav person ...but please do you know much about Hitler if you did you would not make that comment .
309624
Now, now.  Just because Hitler and Bush used the same political manipulations (gotta love those gullible christians) and had wars doesn't make them one and the same.  Where's the overt racial and ethnocentric prejudice?  See?  He's more like a reformed Hitler, minus the economic prosperity.  Besides, Bush has far more elements of a robber barron of 100 years ago except instead of having people die over making railroads, they are getting shot for oil profits.  To Bush's credit, there has been far fewer causualties over in Iraq despite it being called a "war" than Carnegie produced in steel mills...  We're just bitter that we're not ripping off the American people ourselves though.  I mean, look at Michael Moore.  He got on the oil gravy train and now how much do you hear from him?  It's like a gasoline lined pacifier!\n\nAs for evil people?  Hey, there are fools supporting both politcial parties in this country.  It's open to all!  As Dinesh D'Sousa (former Regan advisor) said, there are thinking patriots and stupid patriots (aka dogmatic morons).  If it wasn't for DD coming in to talk for our local College Republicans, I might have never known for sure that the public rhetoric didn't really match the real Republican rationales for action.  I suspect that one day a lot of the "religious right" will get their clue on... and God help the republocrats when it happens!  (I'll be cheering on the christians that day, btw)\n\nOooh, wait, there's a real debate issue here?  Thank you fifiday1 for bringing that up!  Remember good old NAFTA?  You know, the one Bush senior's admin wrote up and good old Billybob Clinton signed into law.  Yeah, you know.  The one where your jobs go south along with all our actual trade policy.  Yep.  That one.  I actually studied it and an ungodly amount of the congressional record surrounding it.  It was BIPARTISAN, baby, oh yeah!  AND they knew it would be BAD FOR YOU!  Aren't our republicrats great!  They sent your wages to China, baby!  It's LONG gone.  You're worried about IMMIGRANTS?  Whatever.  We've gone GLOBAL and that means competiting for jobs with people in China, India, and Indonesia.  American Southwest?  That's just the tiny tip of the iceberg.  You'll be fighting that while Bush pushes CAFTA, which will just speed up your (ok, our) losses even more!  Gotta love the guy.  Tells you that he's against abortion with one head while the other head pressures people to ship their jobs to Timbuktu.\n\nPretzeldunce?  I'd bet Andrew Carnegie would call that sort of lining your pocket at other people's expense "nothing short of brilliant!"  It's every man for himself, baby, oh, yeah.  What a wonderful world we live in!\n\n\nPS. The questioner is making fun of a GAFF - another Bush slip of the tongue.  Political opponents try to make him look "stupid" because he has a speech impediment.  Everyone makes little typos and errors from time to time, but there is a crew of pundits waiting like vultures to jump on each and every one in every presidency.  Really, I like Eye_of_Sauron joke questions better...
650163
You're not bush bashing? Too bad. i thought i'd found a kindred spirit. Lol. Anyways, if i believed in a heaven and hell, i'd say Bush would be going to the deepest circle of hell. The one reserved for the Hitler's and the Stalin's. Though he's not quite as bad as those two, he still belongs in that category.
472042
Although I will agree that Bush is a terrible president, your relationship with Hitler is silly. Bush is breaking international law and is a terrorist in the sense of the United Nations, but he is not Hitler. Hitler had a slow, methodical plan to eliminate non-Aryans from Europe. Bush is just illegally holding Muslims that do not agree with the doctrine of the United States and her policies/illegal occupation. One is abusing his powers. The other planned the death of millions and used all of his resources to do so.
763329
Hitler was a better leader, and his agenda was clear . people may not have agreed with it but it was a clear plan . George Bush has created a major divison within this country .Hitler brought people together , and In his mind the genocide of jews was justified .
721316
Bush is Adolf re-incarnated.  He actualy says exactly waht Hitler used to, including ' Now I have political capital'.
742306
of curse !\n\ncan anybody tell me difference beetwen Bush and Hitler ?\n\nsend me a mail\nthanks
372180
I definitely AGREE! Bush and Hitler r the same. bush just sends his people to war and they r just being killed and bush doesn't give a shit what happens to them. Bush can burn in hell. the only reason y he went over to Iraq* is because that crazy ass dude that ran the country almost killed Bush's father so bush wanted to go over there and get revenge for his daddy. bush can burn in HELL!
1172578
He is not a duffer but he is somewhat like Hitler of the 21st century.
1072577
Is it really possible to be dumber than Bush? Looking at the posts from fat old fart and pobept, I'd have to say it is.
608558
Bush follows Hitler and america is following Nazi Germany, despite the fact that large population hates him he has become the prez again, same was Hitler many in Germany hated him, america is going to start WW3 and India and China will come to the rescue of the world
1039168
Bush is Hitler's grandnephew three times removed.\n\nFor 3 million a day, I can find better bargains.\n\nKing David.
999855
Oh...that is too funny. It may be too far apart to be reincarnation. But who knows. Maybe you sit in waiting for a year for a suitable parent match. Ha!\n\nAlthough I don't like Bush...at all...I can't stand him. Ignorant fool. I'm not quite ready to compare him to Hitler. Hitler was far more cruel than Georgie ever will be. George is just plain ignorant with a hint of evil masked by false Christianity. And in some ways, he is a killer...maybe not directly. But he is responsible for the deaths of thousands. Funny question though. Made me laugh.
439366
I would argue Bush is the same way.
146379
In fact, several disturbing analogies exist between George W. Bush and history's most infamous fascist, Adolph Hitler: Both men assumed power in defiance of the will of the majority; both men used “great lies” to pursue their warmongering agendas; both men preyed upon humanity's basest instincts to disseminate those “great lies”; both men were appeased by the British government, Hitler through Neville Chamberlain and Bush through Tony Blair; both men were willing to use national tragedies to justify the destruction of civil liberties, Hitler through the burning of the Reichstag and Bush through the September 11th terrorist attacks; both men were/are suspected of either participating in, or ignoring warnings about the imminence of, these tragedies in order to enhance their political stature and power; both men demonstrated no compunction about exploiting a culture of death for political self-aggrandizement, Hitler through his well-publicized genocide campaigns, and Bush who, while governor of Texas, routinely denied DNA tests to death row inmates, even though such tests could prevent wrongful executions; both men were willing to appeal to racism, Hitler through his quest for a “master race,” and Bush through his condemnation of affirmative action policies, which primarily benefit racial minorities.   While denouncing such policies as “preferential treatment,” Bush predictably displayed no such aversion to the preferential treatment enjoyed by wealthy white people, like himself, through a system of nepotism and cronyism; both men reveled in war and exploited the military to satiate their personal ambitions and vendettas; both men used war to enrich their political cronies; both men demonstrated contempt for international law and the concerns of the world community; and both men believed they were/are on some holy crusade inspired by a “divine province” that placed them into power.\n\nBut the disconcerting advantages the Bush dictatorship enjoys over Hitler's are the scientific advances that have made the implementation of fascism much easier.  New technologies have given the government Orwellian capabilities. Programs now exist to decipher every stroke made on a computer keyboard, to spy upon people from great distances, to create databases designed to blacklist and harass those who don’t obsequiously genuflect before official dogma, and to install microchips into vehicles, and even into people, to monitor their every move.  In addition, advances in genetics provide the opportunity to establish a “master race,” simply by denying insurance or other medical care to those with genetic proclivities to certain diseases, and to create DNA databases that will enable the government to categorize and/or spy upon individuals with certain genetic predispositions.  \n\nThere is also the glut of “recreational” technology to keep Americans inactive and thus ill-informed: computer games, videos and DVDs, 24-hour sports broadcasts, hundreds of television channels available through cable or satellite, and a media enamored with a “cult-of-celebrity” to distract the populace with superficialities (innocuously called “infotainment”) while social injustices are ignored and freedom and democracy decimated.  In fact some social critics recently noted the irony that more outrage had been generated over the methods used to select a champion in college football than the methods used to elect a president.\n\nOf course some may argue that Hitler clearly was compelled by evil motives, while Bush was compelled by “benevolent” ones.  But this ignores the reality that the primary difference between Bush and Hitler may simply be milieu, not mind-set.  In fact, actor/activist Harry Belafonte once courageously asserted that the Bush administration is “possessed of evil.”  These words should not be dismissed as hyperbole.  Hitler, after all, did not begin his campaign for world domination until fascism was
877108
I don't really see any similarities at all. If there are any, they are very loose similarities.