Do you think George Bush is still a "uniter" and not a "divider?
970864
When has he ever united people?\nAmericans these days are polarized like never before because of his foreign and domestic policies, and the Iraqis are split up and most of them are scared for their lives, not having any real place to live.\nHow is he a uniter? I would say he is definitely a divider.
1072764
I haven't seen him but I have seen other right-wing nut jobs posting all the time spewing their hatred for us Liberals.  Just because we don't agree with everything Bush says or does doesn't make us scum suckers as one guy put it.
441738
I hear alot of people here in Egypt say that he is "The Man" he could face Bush and not to obey to him .But I think he overstepped the limit by saying he will remove a country from Earth ... but he is still Brave in my opinion and he can be a good Leader I think in the soon future.
1017009
Yes - that's a long time. Let's see.....  He free'd Afghanastan from the grips of the Taliban. He's free'd the people of Iraq from a vicious dictator. He's created a booming economy (this is the economy that the media is never reporting about) from a recession he inherited from Clinton, and the 9/11 disaster. He's rebalanced the Supreme Court. He's cut taxes to put more money in everyone's pocket. I'd say he's done a pretty good job....\nThanks for pointing that out.
809743
He is the great divider.\n\nHis party lost control of Congress, and his policies have been rejected. He is a divider for America.\n\nHe did unite the world against us.......I can agree!
50340
Why don't you take a cue from your President and try to bring the country together instead of tearing it apart? He is not my President of choice but I did appreciate him trying to stay away from being or at least sounding bi-partisan whether or not that's really what he cares about.
228278
It always apart of the US, what makes you think it wasn't?
895920
At no point during his presidency did George Bush wear a crown. He was not, nor is he autonomous. The decisions regarding Iraq are not his alone. He had backing, remember? Many democrats were among those backers initially.
1129659
Good question.  If so many people don't think he's doing a good job as president, doesn't our constitution allow us to get rid of him?  I don't think as many people disapprove of him as it may seem.  The media sure makes it seem that way though.  I think people just say they disapprove of him because it's the social norm.  I might not agree with everything Bush does, but I trust that he always does what he thinks is best for our country.  And who can blame him for that?
418315
Neither, I think the line is somewhere in between all of the party's ideas.  But, there is something I want to say...Republican, Democrat, or whatever you are, we should support our President and his decisions.  Even if we don't agree, we as a whole United States voted for him.  Now that he's in term, it's not about ourselves as singles-it's about us as a United States.
1000949
He wasn't the greatest President ever, but at least the economy as growing steadily and people had jobs (including the Prez himself - LMAO). Oh yeah, and I do believe we had a balanced budget once again, didn't we? ; )\n\nI'm no fan of the Democrats nor the Republicans, so I vote third party all the time. But things seemed to get done on his watch.
853206
I think for the last year President Bush has been the fall guy for Rumsfield but loyalty is high on his agenda. His administration has more friends than many think - the election is over & to take the next election will require unity. We proved every man for himself did not work. The ranks will close. My state went 82% Republican including several Democrat seats to state Senate & House. We split our national House seats. Conservatives & Moderates will learn the Democrats do not speak for them. This could be a good thing - sacrificial lambs.
421459
Depends on who's saying it... when Bush says stuff like - The International commmunity is behind us in Iraq - he means the America and her allies, other people seem to have a european view of "international commuinty".. focusing a lot of european countries... it should probably be all nations, but it rarely takes third world nations into account...
875288
Good question! At the last election Bush went on about 'Massachusetts liberals' (forgetting that he is president of Massachusetts as well as the other 49 states)  even though it pays its own way in the Union, contributing more than it takes out.
1149874
with everything that has happened, you cant help but question his leadership style. Lets break it down, \n1)Delegation is a big part of his leadership of the country. He delegates practically everything, which, honestly, is what a good leader does. He has appointed various people as being in charge of different aspects from FEMA to border patrol to homeland security, to etc. etc. This is a good move in my opinion because it carries the view of more than just one person. HOWEVER, the people that are in teh leadership positions are "yes men". Granted, bush doesn't always have say in who is in charge of what but he should at least check up on them on a regular basis. \n2)Taxes. Well, with him there has been a flux in this subject. both up and down depending on which taxes we talk about. National tax is down but prices for gas and other "necessaties" are up. \n3)Relations. This is the kicker for most people. The guy is from Texas. If you've never met people that actually grew up in Texas, than honestly, you cant compare him to the rest of the country. I've lived in Texas, Florida, Washington, Virginia, plus VARIOUS countries overseas. People from Texas have something different from the rest of the states and world. THey are more direct. Even more than New Yorkers. So the way he deals and speaks not only to us but to other presidents is something to question and worry about. However, he is a person that sticks to what he believes in and does not bend because people do not agree with him.\n4)Responsibility. Hell, no president will ever fully admit total responsibility when things go wrong so we should expect bush to do it either. Clinton did things that are immoral and yet, people didn't say much. \nComparing him to other presidents in the past, he may not be the best but no other president had to deal with the issues bush is dealing with currently. People say "this is just like what happened with ......" If it was really the same thing, than it would be completely similar to what happened in the past. But, it will never be like that because things have changed from a decade ago, let alone fifty/sixty years ago.\nOverall, leadership wise, he is the guy I chose over any other canidates. He is more straight forward and somewhat trustworthy. All the others seemed more concerned with the title "President" as apposed to the responsibilities it came with. Bush is the only one that gave examples in all of the debates and talks. Everyone else said they "had a plan" but NEVER illustrated that plan to anyone. Well, if you have a plan.... what is it? I asked this question month after month with no response from any other canidate. In the end, i don't think bush has done that bad. could be better but not as bad as some make him out to be.
770949
You should stop seeing America as divided.  There are varying views from every direction.  Try to ask more productive questions.
390162
I consider President George W. Bush as a good leader for the United States of America in the 21st Century. You cannot call Bush an Emperor because America is not an Empire and has never been an Empire.