Is ths stories of area 51 true or false? Do they test secret aircraft or is it more.................?
952996
my grandfather worked in area 51 for 3 years. my own grandma didnt even know it until after he died. the secrets run deep out there, but what she figured out was they were testing experimental aircraft. the secrecy is for our national security. my grandfather designed electrical blueprints for aircrafts. the stealth bomber was one of his "projects".
447786
I know they are real..there certainly should be no question in regard to their true existence..I am sure that ..every one of the thousands and thousands of sightings YEARLY believe them as real as well. I have been wittness to them all my life.. even more now than ever before...there is no doubt whatsoever in my mind..I just cannot understand why we continue accepting these lies from all the world governments in regards to UFOs and extraterrestrials..they have been here for the entire history of Human civilization.
204643
It is not clear What is going on in Area 51, but it is clear that something that common people doesn't have to know about it. It is one of the most secure place on the surface of earth. \nHowever, many people just say that there is test site for UFO, new age air-craft, and some of the most secret weapons in the U.S.\nI hope it helps you get an idea what is Area 51
612669
It is the same footage because before it was leaked, now it has been officially released. This is what I heard here but I havn't been in the US since last november. Your link was the first i saw this footage leaked or released.\n\nCan't tell that it's a plane. My computers not great and it's a small viewing box but I guess enough have said it's not great where I believe that a larger view wouldn't help much. It also appears to come in horizontally only fueling my suspicion. I imagine a plane would come in at an angle, especially since the pentagon is not that high. Never flew a plane but flew enough simulators to know skimming across the ground that low ain't easy, especially for someone with little flight experience and probably never flew an actual jumbo jet before. Looks like a rocket fired sideways like in an explosion test. I can't tell it's even the pentagon. If they hoped to clear up rumors that doesn't help. They really did it anyway to remind us why we fight.
710575
"Lies" as you call it are classified information about advanced aircraft.  Haven't you heard that loose lips sink ships.  The truth about Area 51 cannot be made public in our national security interests.  The thing that bothers me is, the amount of power/control the base commanders have over human rights of the workers.  They can't unionize or grieve, especially related to the exposure to contaminated waste that has been alleged.  The commander's absolute authority has a tendency to be corrupt, by its very nature.\n\nAnd, oh by the way, the base operations is not Air Force, contrary to popular opinion.
76527
UFO???  I interpret this to be anything buzzing in the air that I have no clue what the heck it was,,, but this happens mostly just at night.. during tha daylight hours I can see things more clearly.\n\nDo I think aliens exhist??..The based on a true story movie "Fire in the sky" was pretty darn convincing
554543
I'm not to sure of this ,but I think I once read somewhere\nabout bomber crews of the R.A.F. and the U.S.A.A.F.(as it was then)reporting strange looking aircraft that they saw in European skies,try the reference library,a fascinating subject,best of luck with it
497729
as for insurance purposes, I dunno, but as for all the complaints, those areas are called UFO 'hotspots', the hotspots are centered around Groom Lake in New Mexico, the so-called Area 51, dunnp why this is, but stealth aircraft are developed and tested there.
58090
I think that personal anecdotes of alien abductions and accounts from former military personnel about supposedly classified government information on alien visitation are untrustworthy for a variety of reasons. \n\nI find the ancient artwork and accounts of people travelling in strange flying craft slightly more compelling, but again not really good evidence. \n\nThe existence of large jumps in technology in ancient civilizations might be taken as evidence by some, but I think it just points to the inventiveness of humans. \n\nWe do not have any good photographic or other evidence of alien visitation. \n\nWe do not have any physical evidence of alien visits, like materials unknown on earth. Crop circles do not constitute good physical evidence. \n\nSo, at least in my opinion, the evidence for alien visitation is very very weak.
711061
The beings that pilot flying saucers are from earth. They have done a great job of misinformation by convincing us they are from 'someplace else'. Nearly every account of a saucer 'pilot' naming it's 'home-world' is a different place. That's like 25-30 different answers given to the question 'where are you from'? I think it's intentional misdirection and that the truth may be stranger than fiction.
241417
Yes of course they are hiding what they know..truly..if they did not know of them..there would be a lot more tension military wise in regard to so many thousands of sightings. The government would not take it as lightly..that is the most obvious fact.\nI can say they are real because I have seen them all my life..I know that we ...are not alone.
299004
Well, thats not all. The only pictures released by the government from the security cameras in the area, were dated Sept. 12, and many experts feel they were faked. The parts of the plane that were found, were not from the airliner they described. Then there is the punchout on the inside ring.\nThere remain many many questions about that day...
954969
Ever heard of area 51 - major cover up?
68395
Perhaps, but not visiting us. Think about it. Why did flying saucers and abductions only start to be reported after man invented flying machines? Not many claims in history of aliens and what not. Its because UFOs are most likely classified test vehicles that the airforce is using. We know for sure those exist and where they are stored.
574302
If your claim was really true, you must be an aeronautical genius.  You'd be too smart wasting your time asking this on some goofy anonymous website like this one.
408434
you would have to prove that they didn't to me. here's physical proof i list.\n\nNano tubes and printed circuitry was found near Roswell back int he 40's 30 years before that stuff was invented!!\n\nHieroglyphs and medieval paintings depict UFOs in them clear as day.  they never believed in flying craft back then, how would they know what it looks like.\n\nCertain crop circle formations have had radiation and genetically altered grass in them.  Teenagers can't do that.\n\nIn Brazil and Phoenix there have been multiple triangulated sightings that all have been confirmed to view the same thing.  These people didn't know each other to be in on it together and they all see the same thing, a bunch of UFOs\n\nAnd to top it off why the hell did Gen. Ramey lie to us when his damn letter talked about a crashed disk with survivors and to cover up the investigation.  It was a letter the general had who was at Roswell who mistakenly had it in his hand when addressing the military press, they took a shot of it and 50 years later with our photo technology revealed what it said.\n\nThese can't be explained away cause they are hard evidence with verifiable facts.
1108837
Yes, these things have been widely scientifically tested.\n\nOver a period of more than 20 years, the CIA and Pentagon spent approximately $20 million to study and employ numerous "psychics." They were supposed to help track down terrorists, find hostages, help anti-drug activities, etc. Experiments were conducted on precognition, clairvoyance, and remote viewing.\n\nThe "psychics" were accurate about 15% of the time when they were helping the CIA.   Fifteeen percent?  Is this supposed to convince us to pay them to help the United States government?  Utts says she thinks "they would be effective if used in conjunction with other intelligence." My intelligence tells me that 15% accuracy isn't much help no matter what it's used in conjunction with--that's an 85% failure rate! So 85% of the time, spies would be wasting their time and resources on incorrect information. We're supposed to be happy with that? And that's presuming she's right about the 15%.\n\nThe results have always been the same: psychic phenomena achieve the same results as random guesses.\n\nWhat that means is that they don't exist. People who call themselves psychics are either deluded and simply guessing, or more often they are charlatans like John Edward who try to take people's money by pretending to be psychic,