whats the difference between a single stage trigger and whatever other kind there is?
961065
Bound's hubby here:\n\nThere are three types of triggers that can be found on a target rifle. These are a single stage trigger, a two stage trigger, and a set trigger. \n\nA single stage trigger is a type of trigger that has very little play (movement) between when the finger first puts pressure on the trigger and when the sear releases. Some target shooters (such as myself) prefer a single stage trigger on competitive AR15-based target rifles.\n\nA two stage trigger is the type of trigger that is most commonly found on a military/service rifle. When the finger is placed on the trigger, there will be a large amount of play as the trigger moves from the first sear to the second sear. The second sear actually releases the hammer. By NRA rules for service rifle competition  the trigger must be able to hold either 3 1/2 or 4 1/2 pounds before the hammer is released (I get the weight for service rifle and service pistol confused, it's one or the other). The two stage trigger is the one found on the Springfield rifle, the M1 Garand, the M14 and the AR15/M16. \n\nThe other type of trigger system which Christopher (above) describes rather well but with the wrong name is a set trigger. This trigger system was found on muzzleloaders and you saw it in "Quigley: Down Under" on Quigley's Sharp's rifle. This trigger system has two triggers. The first (forward) is squeezed like a regular trigger to prepare the second trigger for firing. The first trigger does not release the hammer. Once the second trigger is set it acts much like a "hair trigger". The second trigger, when set, releases the hammer with just a little bit of finger pressure on the trigger. \n\nVirtually all modern commercial rifles that are not copies of military rifles have a single stage trigger. Military rifles are standard with two stage triggers. You would be hard pressed to find a set trigger system on a modern rifle today. \n\nHere endeth the lesson! \n\nGood luck.
577362
You can get taps that work either way.\n\nOne of mine was worn out. Very irritating to get the wrong one and install it. It took me weeks to really get used to it.
259973
This weblink will explain the differance between the 2\nhttp://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gorry/eg2069/async.html
1028797
well theres one for pulse and one for oxygen saturation.  check also with respiratory tech infor
168409
This again is a very vague question, I can only guess that the output stage shows the timing graphs. But unless you provide us with a link to a particular site or reference of what you are trying to ask, then we can not know the question exactly.\n\nPlease bear in mind you lose two points every time you ask a question. So make you answer as much as you ask !\n\nAnhar Hussain Miah
731110
Maybe after explaining the different electronic firing systems you can get a better understanding.\n\nThere are two common electrical systems.\n\nSear-Trippers and Electropneumatics.\n\nSear trippers use electronics just to replace the trigger pull. In most mechanical markers, there is a system in the grip that holds the bolt or hammer in it's cocked position. Pulling the trigger releases the bolt (or hammer), which is then driven to hit a valve using a spring. The piece that holds the bolt / hammer back is the sear. Guns advertised with E-grips / E-triggers use an electronic action to trip the sear instead of forces from your finger, hence sear-tripper.\n\nMost electropneumatics don't have sears at all but instead use a ram or air to push the bolt / hammer forward instead of the usual spring. I don't want to get into the details of it.\n\n\n\nThere is no real difference between an E-grip or E-trigger in what they do. There would only be a difference if the electronics used are different.\n\nThe term is pretty much interchangeable. The one difference is in a 98 custom, which cannot use an E-grip without heavy modification and permanent removal of the main grip. this is because E-grips are sold with entirely separate grips. An e-trigger kit will just replace the insides.\n\n\nIf you're wondering if electropneus are better or sear trippers, I would have to say electropneus. Do some research and you'll understand why.
427102
doesnt matter, use either one
796794
Do I only pick one or can I choose all of the above?
234195
Instead of just buying a new trigger try moving the trigger closer to teh micro switch so it wont take as long for you to pull the trigger. My trigger is so close to my micrositch that a tap on it will fire it. But only shoot as fast as you gun can handle or otherwise it will chop and its gonna take a long time for you to fix it.
775880
Not much difference only instead of TM you use SM\nAnd both get R if you register with the US PTO.
653087
Here is a very good article that explains the differences:\n\nhttp://experts.about.com/q/Rave-House-Techno-2974/Techno-Trance-Dance.htm
341719
Style:\n\n1. Trigger locks - mechanism to prevent access to trigger\n2. Action locks - locks the action of the weapon open so it cannot be loaded or chamber a round.\n3. Internal lock - Newer gun models have built in locks that prevent the weapon from being fired without the key.
938555
Different makes, and even different models from the same manufacturer, do differ.  I know this, as I have written the software for one model.  In fact, the algorithms used are a commercial secret, guarded carefully between manufacturers.  This is also the reason I am unable to provide more data, or references.\n\nYou may be able to find them for yourself, though.  Good luck.
335187
edge triggering is used when you want to trigger something on the rising edge or falling edge (one or the other) of a clock pulse. level triggering is used when you want to trigger on the stable high and low of a clock pulse.
278871
To the computer hardware, 1's complement is a one-step action.  Adding each bit would be many steps.\n\n1's complement works just as well and is much faster.
932202
Edmunds Scientific\n--> http://scientificsonline.com/search.asp?t=ss&ss=strobe
846567
ARE YOU ARE AFTER SPECIFIC PART NUMBERS OR JUST GENERIC EXAMPLES?