In Glendale,CA who is in charge/Group of people that gives out the consent of a pending lawsuit against the?
964166
you need to rephrase your question and put it in english.\n\nare you talking about who decides whether a police department should pay out on a claim or whether a lawsuit should be filed or whether the police did something wrong.
995376
Ask your lawyer, or whoever is handling your case.
1057182
plaintiff or petitioner
109231
Call the district attorney's office as they are the ones who issued the warrant.
338609
Only if they reside in CA
520266
Call the local bar association in that county.  They should be able to hook you up w/ someone who will take the case on a contingency basis.
128425
Teh group of civilians that help to make the laws.
447573
I looked it up on westlaw...it looks like a landlord/tenant case.  the plaintiff, Karagiannis, leased the sixth floor of a building from defendant Malltown.  The lease stated that all "common areas" (shared areas) would be under the control of the lessor (defendant)  When other floors became unoccupied, the defendant stopped service of some of the elevators/escalators that brought people to the sixth floor cafeteria owned by the defendant.  The plaintiff requested an injunction, he wanted people to have access, obviously.  The defendant said it opened up his unoccupied floors to vandalism, etc.  The court held that the defendant needed to resume service immediately.  It looks as though the reason the court gave was that there was an implied promise on the part of the defendant, b/c the plaintiff had been using the services for a year.....there is alot of detail at the end, but I think that sums it up.  If you need more on reasons why, and if this is for a class you probably do, try googling the case, or findlaw.com\n\nGood luck!
253719
http://www.lacitybeat.com/article.php?id=1919&IssueNum=97\n\nThe author of that article and the attornies mentioned in the story...the ruling on that suit is pending, but the Federal Judge is leaning towards the Plaintiff (that's the inmates, in this case)
576778
California has a Victim Compensation Fund, www.boc.ca.gov/Victims \nThe perps may be required to pay restitution, but don't hold your breath.  Contact the DA's office to see what the progress of the criminal case is.  They are going to need your Dad as a witness.\nIt is possible that the entity operating the complex might be liable, although your question does not give me any ideas how.  If the responsible entity is a government entity, your father must file a claim with that entity within six months (180 days) of the incident.  If the responsible entity is not a government entity the deadline for filing a lawsuit is one year from the incident.  Seek legal advice as soon as possible.
515709
It gets complicated fast, but bear with me (also I'm typing this at 1:00 am)\nUnder the Federal laws that allow for certain types of claims for racial, ethnic, age, sexual discrimination, the claimant must file a claim with the appropriate federal or state agency.  That agency has a certain amount of time to investigate and decide if it wants to proceed against the offender. While the agency is deciding, the claimant may not proceed with a suit against the offender. If the agency proceeds, the claimant is bound by the decision in that action.\nIf the agency does not decide to prosecute it will send the claimant a formal letter saying that the agency had investigated, what the results were, and that the agency is not going to file suit on behalf of the claimant, and that all actions required of the agency having been done, the stay is lifted, and the claimant now has *the right to sue* the offender.  \n\nSo, rather than being approval from the agency, the right to sue letter merely says the agency is not going to spend taxpayer dollars on behalf of the claimant, and the claimant can now trot down to the courthouse and file.
785214
Um, right here. You are welcome!!!\n\n\nSupreme Court of Nevada.\nJohn Edward BUTLER, Appellant,\nv.\nThe STATE of Nevada, Respondent.\nNo. 41283.\nDec. 20, 2004.\n\n\nBefore the Court En Banc. [FN1]\n\n\nFN1. The Honorable Michael L. Douglas, Justice, did not participate in the decision of this matter.\n\n\n\nOPINION\n\nSHEARING, C.J.\nAppellant John Butler was convicted by a jury of two counts of first-degree murder with the use of a deadly weapon and was thereafter sentenced by the jury to death. On appeal, we affirm Butler's convictions, but *75 we vacate his death sentences and remand for a new penalty hearing.\n\nFACTS\nI. Guilt phase\nJohn Butler was an influential member of a white supremacist gang known as the Independent Nazi Skinheads (INS). The victims Linn Newborn, an African-American male, and Daniel Shersty, a Caucasian male, were members of a rival nonracist gang known as Skinheads Against Racial Prejudice (SHARP). Newborn was a leader of SHARP.\nINS was distinguishable from SHARP by its manner of dress and beliefs. The members of these two gangs clashed because of opposing views on racism. INS members want to preserve the white race without pollution from other races; SHARP members want to promote racial unity. According to Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD) Officer Greg Damarin, a former gang unit detective, both INS and SHARP are violent skinhead gangs.\nOn the evening of July 3, 1998, Newborn was at his place of work, Tribal Body Piercing. The Stakeout Bar and Grill was located in the same shopping center as Tribal Body Piercing, and Carolyn Trotti was also at work that night tending the bar. Trotti identified Melissa Hack, an INS member and Butler's girlfriend, as one of two girls that had been in and out of the bar four or five times that night. Newborn and Shersty later told friends that they were going to party that night with a couple of girls they had met at Newborn's work when Newborn had pierced one of them. Newborn and Shersty were never heard from again.\nOn the morning of July 4, 1998, Butler called Joey Justin and said that he needed help doing something but did not want to talk about it over the phone. Butler and Melissa later picked up Justin and drove to a dirt road in the desert. On the way there, Butler said that "he needed help picking up some mistakes they left out there from the night before," including a beer bottle with Melissa's fingerprints on it and shotgun shells. Butler warned Justin that he would possibly see one or two bodies. After arriving, Justin saw a blood-covered body on the ground. He and Melissa began picking up the pieces of a broken bottle in the dirt when they noticed someone was approaching. Justin yelled for Butler.\nAnthony Harris, his father James, and a family friend were riding recreational all terrain vehicles (ATVs) in the desert when they came upon a body, later identified as Shersty's, which was covered with blood and lying on the ground. The ATV riders next saw two males, one of whom Anthony Harris identified as Butler, and a female approaching from the desert. The approaching group waved their hands. Butler yelled to ask whether the ATV riders had a cellular phone to call the police.\nButler and his companions got inside their car. The female covered her face and ducked down. James Harris used his cellular phone to call the police. Butler drove toward the ATV riders. As the car passed, Butler stopped to say that his girlfriend was sick and that he could not stay. Anthony Harris wrote the vehicle's license plate number in the dirt. Butler noticed this and told Anthony that it was unnecessary--Butler would give him a pager number. [FN2] Butler soon drove away.\n\n\nFN2. Anthony was not certain whether Butler actually left a number. According to Justin, Butler gave the ATV riders a number, but he had never seen Butler with a pager.\n\n\nWhile Butler drove Justin home, Butler told him that if the police asked, he
108192
First, I would be going to the owner of the company and lodging your complaint, since it is a supervisor that the harrassment charges are being leveled against.  If this does not resolve the situation, then I would talk to an attorney about the matter.
745275
Make them get a search warrant. \n If you give them permission or open the hood you are giving consent to a search.  \nThey must have probable cause.  More than likely they can't prove it to a judge, so no search warrant will be produced.\nOf course be ready for the repercussions of upholding your rights.  They don't like citizens who rebuke their abuse of power.......
891561
People and if they want something.
1081952
Call the court house and give them the name and ask.
652331
Part ownership in the corporation that owns the park.  The residents and others are stockholders