What do Dems think of cut and run?
952812
Saun Hannity couldn't even get an honest answer from a liberal who voted Democrat.\nJust GIGO.\nno plan whatsoever.
103566
"The Democratic Party is one of the two political parties forming a useless oligarchy in the United States."\n\nSorry, I'm very cynical. Perhaps you could choose one particular issue, such as their stance on abortion or the death penalty, and provide some background as to why they decided to be pro or con. Either that, or give a synopsis of their views on a few different issues and then provide an overall opinion of their mindset - that could be your opening line. Maybe you could try explaining why the Democrats seem to appeal more to the young.
942111
Yes.  \n\n1.  Letting the Shia militia out of Najaf\n2.  Failing to cut spending which is related to\n3.  Failing to veto any spending bills\n4.  Stupid stance on stem cell research.\n\nI'm still not running out to vote for Dems.  I will not vote against a party, I want to vote for a plan.
898377
Democrats from the beginning have had problems with terrorism. For one thing they haven't produce a plan on terrorism. By the way there have been some rank and file Dems which have broken away from their party and have gone Republican. Why? the ranting far left and thier criticism of the President. The keep talking the talk but they haven't produce results. U see Democrats care about is power and high taxes.
68617
Yes they have an adgenda, it being a truly Christian political party, you know looking after the interests of all people in the USA INCLUDING THE POOR oh did I say a bad word!!!; you know raising the Minimum wage, stopping the GOP from attacking things like Food stamps, Medicade, Social Security, stopping Companys from denying employees there rightfull Pensions,  Stopping the GOP from making anymore Tax cuts for 3% of the population of our  nation.   Of course they will Purge the war on Terrorism, does anyone think that when a Democratic Government came to power they would instruct the CIA FBI Homeland security and all to lay of AlQueda!!! Of course not they would increase the security in our ports and Borders by reducing the amount of money spent in Iraq.  USA is not the world bank is it ???? why should the USA and the USA only be the sole supplier of ways to rebuild Iraq, hey Arabia is rich very rich as we all know, if the bordering countries to Iraq want peace in this country, let them cough up the moneytries for this purpose.\nThere is no link from Iraq to 9/11 all the people involved in 9/11 were Saudi fact!!!!! and how do you explain the London and Spain incedents and others, surly if all the Terrorists were purged from Iraq the london bombing could still have happend, so why are we spending $200 billion a year in Iraq $200 billion we could use badly in the USA!!\nI personally dont except that the World Economy is something America & Europe has to go along with. I would like to think that the Democratic party would give Tax incentives to Companys who build there Factorys in the USA employ American people and advertise that they are pulling for the American worker. \nIs it right that the GOP pulls for any worker but the American one!! Its all a cover up for the real truth that is " The non European or American worker will accept less money an hour" this is the real truth isnt it. So for starters the Democratic party will pull for the American worker inside the USA They will keep up the world wide war on Terror. And a Democratic Senate would move towards a National Health service, with some kind of means test and opt out for those who can afford Private Health Insurance, so that mothers no longer have to choose between Food or Medicine for there children in USA 2006, the truth is 50% of GOP adgenda is Democratic adgenda so nothing would change in most departments of Government, I mean our Armed forces are not Republican nor are the CIA FBI, they advise and obey the ruling party whoever they are.\nAs per your statements about Hillary Clinton, taking some of the Propaganda i have heard in the last 2 years to the ridiculous extent that some of you do, NO Mrs Clinton is not a AlQueda agent undercover, do you really believe this??? she wants Education in the USA to improve, she wants our Economy to thrive, Example she wants China to accept Exports from the USA, something not happening now \nI bet your sole bone of contention is :- does she agree with G W Bush on Iraq or not. full stop \nI would be interested if you have any other complaints about Hillarys Opinions; other than Iraq.and the War on terror.
236792
WELL YOU HAVE TO HAVE A STRONG TRACK RECORD OF BEING TOUGH ON NATIONAL SECURITY, WHICH THE DEMS NEVER HAD, AND SAYING THE TRUTH ABOUT THE ECONOMY, WHICH IS BOOMING. THE DEMS DONT HAVE A CHANCE ON THAT ONE. THE DEMS WILL TELL YOU THE ECONOMY IS WEAK, WHICH WE ALL KNOW ISNT. IN 08 I BET EVERYTHING WILL BE GREAT AS TIME GOES ON, AND THE DEMS WILL SAY THEY WANT CHANGE, BUT CHANGE TO WHAT? FROM GREAT TO HORRIBLE? LMFAO!
790592
They are distancing themselves like they did when Dean made a joke of himself.  I am embarrassed to say I am a Democrat because since the late 70's, the party left the working man, and parallels itself with Labor and the welfare group.\n\nHaving served, I think it was a MAJOR slap in the face to the men and woman who serve our country.  It is an all Volunteer force and these people signed on the dotted line. Has nothing to do with education as many have college and OCS under their belts and are officers.\n\n\nSemper Fi
586091
Well now hear this from one old man lmao. \nAt one time the Democrats were for the working people, and the working people knew it.\nBut somewhere along the line they drifted off in a direction that leads them to not helping working class anymore but helping with the programs that only few can get.\nJust look at all there programs out there that the Democrats have make in all the past years and please tell me one that a working man or woman can get on.\nYes we need to help the poor but we do not need to have them lead us.\n\nSo I say the silent majority will win again, cause most of us are now Republicans.
1155020
I agree with you.  It also bothers me that the Republicans keep saying that the Dems always complain about the war but they don't have a plan.  Then when they do come up with a plan, the Reps tear it apart and then turn it around and make it their own.  Case in point: Gen. Casey's plan for troop withdrawl.  Dems had the same idea and the Reps shot it down.  Now they aren't saying anything since Casey is presenting it.  They won't call him a "cut and runner."  \nThat's another thing that bugs me.  "Cut and run."  That's bull!  It's not cutting and running, it's changing strategies and rethinking our plans.  You can't find many Democrats that are calling to bring all troops home from the middle east.  They want redeployment to Afghanastan where the REAL terrorist always was.  If we would have stayed there first, we wouldn't have the terrorist cells in such great numbers in Iraq.\nJohn Murtha may not know everything that is going on in Iraq...not many do...but he has more experience than anyone in the White House right now.  I'd take his word over any of theirs.  Dick Cheney is a weasel and a jerk for the way he has treated Mr. Murtha.
855233
I wouldn't mind seeing it and I am a liberal--there is so much corruption on both sides of the fence, it makes me sick.\n\nI just feel my interests are best served by Dems. at this point because I am an unisured college student...and the Repubs. raised the interest on student loans and cut Pell Grants.  So, screw 'em!
182910
I don't think so.\n\nThe Rahman story seems to have had a mostly negative impact on the American public's outlook on Afghanistan.  A state which previously had been considered "cured" with democracy putting people to death for conversion?  It makes you wonder what the fuck we spent all that money on.\n\nAlso when it comes down to it Bush can't run again.  He doesn't have to build his own approval rating so long as the Republican party stays popular (the Dubai ports deal and immigration are issues the party will continue to criticize Bush for, at least in rhetoric). In this manner they will continue to sign away things like bankruptcy protections (best for credit companies), Tort protections (best for big insurance companies, and no, medical costs won’t go down for most medical work), and immigration law (best for big manufacturing companies).\n\nThe list goes on.  The really disappointing thing is that I doubt things would be very different with any of the popularly known Democrats in power. \n\nRegards,\nArmus
761962
Amazing how the Neocons criticised "libs" for "cut and run". Now that Dems are pushing for a draft so the US can achieve "victory", Republicans are running scared. Geroge Orwell once said that a Republican is someone too afraid to fight and too fat to run. I believe him. Hypocracy is the hallmark of the neocon, and why we have not achieved victory in Iraq.
787860
Two years after the Democrats do away with the dividend and capital gains tax cuts.\n\nThe ironic thing is that many who vote Democrat are too dumb to realize that their pension-plans are in the stock market.\nAnd Democrats still hate the stock market.
709463
Oh, that's an easy one!\n\nSame old stuff.  If the Dems win, he'll talk about how awful they are.   If the Reps win, he'll talk about how awful the Dems are.
841383
The truth,stonewalling and dragging of heals by the democrats,as they lunge in great bounds to try to get any recognition for the war effort and the American voter,as they reach for the prize though they will probably step on their own toes...so take it from a loyal Rebublican,if you really want it,look to see through the disguises of this and find candidates within your party that have morals not laurels(a good example of your losses of character issue is Lieberman whom got disgusted with the Democratic principals and went independant, and he Won!
748612
Lead??that's a good question,might i add more? Lead what? They say we are fine under Democrat lead...I guess some don't read history. During the smear campaign they lead i never saw a plan. All i heard was status quot or change. What are they going to morph into strong leaders now? Ha ha ha they got 2 years lets see what happens.\n\nPoint...They had Lieberman running and the far left tried to smear him because he was moderate,i call that cannibalism..\n\nAnd now we got a Liberal sanfran as speaker..Does Idaho really want to have san Fransisco values?
538830
What makes you think democrats will be any better?  It is dog eat dog in washington and everyone is out for kickbacks and power.  I don't think a change in party really helps anybody but the lobbists who have invested so much money in the candidate of their choice. \n\nWe have to look at each person who runs individually, regardless of their party and evaluate them based on their character and their ideas.