Real strange math problem?
958220
The rationals are a countable subset of [0,1], which\nis an uncountable set. The probability that f(x) = 1 \nis therefore 0.
491451
Ask your school's academic advisor. Judging by the class title this could just be basic math, but every school puts something different in basic math. So I cannot tell you anything.
1075715
Here are two sites that look into the problem:\n\nhttp://www.kw.igs.net/~jackord/bp/f6.html\nhttp://math.fullerton.edu/mathews/N310/projects/e6.htm
849743
This is the third time that this question has been asked!?!?!\n\nIt's a tough one, too.\n\nI'm taking it to work with me and asking my colleges to help me out on it.\n\nBut someone "did" crack this CHALLENGE Question.\n\nSo here's the answer. . .\n\nhttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AvnsMpyNhtwrHV1JVMvXrE4jzKIX?qid=20061130045858AAB57A7\n\nANSWER:  ABCDEFGHJ = 25,693,148\n\nA=2\nB=5 \nC=6\nD=9\nE=7\nF=3\nG=1\nH=4\nJ=8
233014
U R RIGHTT..HOW DID YA GET IT..PLZ CAN YA EXPLAIN..I'VE BEEN TRYING THIS PROBLEM FROM A LONGTIME.EVEN DE CALCULATOR SAYS ITZ "4"..I KNOW DE CALCULATORS WRONG TOO..PLZZ DO EXPLAIN IT TO ME ASAP
94104
u can do it by trial and error. ok the possible digits for ones are just 1,3,5,7,9 since the statement says it is an odd number. ok then try to add 2 and equate it to 12. if it is = that's is the answer. 7+5= 12. so and 7 is greater than 5 by 2. the answer is 75 degrees.
1155709
all odd numbers? but i dunno any other significance
1102516
by any chance is this a question from your maths homework? lol :D\n\nI cant work it out myself because to put it simple, im crap at maths.
604123
I figured it out... the answer is 1/(13*(2-3x))\nIf you need an explanation tell me
609300
This is more of a word problem or a riddle than a math problem.\n\nThe answer is 7 (SEVEN).  Remove its first letter and it becomes EVEN!
16547
Oddities like this are due to floating-point math, and are quite common, unfortunately.  The problem is that floating point numbers are stored in binary, and so they can only be an approximation of most numbers (like .1).  I bet if you do this calculation in Python or C, you'll get the same sort of answer.
154380
I posted these sources earlier to someone else who was looking for math help.\n\nGood Luck!!
570829
u should probably ask that to a math tutor or on askusnow.info
878537
It all dependent on ho your look at the question, o asking the question. it is stander to belie that 2 + 2 = 4. if you take it out of perspective you could see that that 2 puls 2 =22
885957
You have probably figured out that no number will make this statement true. But don't forget about zero. \nYou will also find problems where even zero does not work. In those cases, "no solution" is the correct answer.
467967
this is probably not a perfect answer but this site may give you some clues.\n\nhttp://www.gomath.com/Questions/question.php?question=4751\n\naltrnatively type 'prove v*v = 2gr*r/s+v0*v0-2gr' into a search engine and see what comes up.
621145
With just ! (Factorial), +, -, * and /, it is impossible to get 150 using only 3 5s without the x^2 (Squared) operation (Which means x*x, in case you are in Fifth Grade), or using a '^2' as you say. If you say there is an alternate way, and there really is, then I give up and admit defeat. (I'm sure most others do.) If you are so sure, why don't you post the answer yourself?