Why does Newt Gingrich want to abolish Free speach?
961856
That would be people like you..............
456677
He was trying to give the individual control over his/her account to make sure you would get what you actually put in to it. Of course, this pissed off the demoncrats because if he did that, they could not get it and give it away for votes anymore. Bush also felt like a person being able to control their money and invest in the stock market would be able to increase their retirement account.\n\nHe has given up on it because of liberals and the news media bombarding him at every turn and calling him evil for wanting to give each of us control over our own money. We truly live in a strange country where you are considered evil for not wanting to give all your money away and for wanting to have a decent retirement. You are also considered evil for opposing some immoral lifestyles too even if they go against everything you believe.\n\nYou see, free speech is only free for liberals. if you are conservative or a Christian, you have no free speech anymore and liberals will shout you down every time you bring up a point. They actually do not have an argument so they have to just be loud to drown you out. Typical liberal tactic because theirs is a fact less society that runs on fear.
725224
I think he is worse then Bush BY FAR, he is one of them that really pushed into the Clinton and Monica thing and that's what some politicians will do,kinda sad though when he was known for having multiple affairs of his own at the same time he was pushing it, but even his Republican counterparts didn't like him.Remember he was pushed out by his own republican counterparts for being to extreme and dishonest in 94  Newt was always one of those who was known to be sleeping with his subordinates  wives if they wanted their husband to keep there job, just a dirty SOB. The kind that just plain thinks he is smarter then everyone else and will screw anyone who gets in his way of doing anything unmoral that he wants. I would not be surprised if he starts bashing Bush and telling the public on how he kept telling bush not to do certain things when it could have been him pushing him to do it, the ultimate back stabbing politician
692864
He's probably just a Freeper.\n\n\n\nFreeper  \n \nA pseudo-conservative known correctly as a "neo-con" who likes to pretend they are conservative, but are actually a bunch of pro-corporate whores who worship the grandson of the nazi facilitator Prescott Bush. They are lead by Jim Robinson who, not unlike screaming liberals, will boot you from his site if you say anything wrong about El Presidente Jorge Bushy. \n\nOh crap, we have another freeper stepford wife masterbating over bush.
1164711
"Because this is a free country!" You are free to screw everyone up, especially if it's to violate their individual freedoms.\nBecause he thinks he's doing the country a favor (there's probably too much blonde blood in his veins (I'm free to trash blondes because I'm one of them and because this is America, people!!))
223965
Looks like a NEO_CON Union Meeting in here? I think they should be reported for assembling don't you H-I-B. (SS) rules of engagement don't you know. Some of the Republicans really stepped off with Ports to the Enemy deal, and I loved it. Flip-Flopping off of the NAZI side is happening everyday now. Vote them out in November, and free America from these Tyrants!
1148892
why do liberals want to let them run free\n\nthey arn't animals\n\nthey'd kill you if they had the chance
927516
Even as much as I would like for some people to shut up (Charlie Rangel) I went to war so that they could have the right to speak.\n\nFreedom of speech doesn't end just because you disagree with someone.
374192
coz he's my newt....(minute)\n\nNice one....
24595
I'm not interested in a candidates stances ("I believe in America; my opponent believes in selling babies to gay, drug dealing, communists").  I care about whether or not they're engaged in the problems of the world around them.  Do they care about peoples lives, are they thinking about solutions.  \n\nIt's easy to stand in opposition to what you don't like and say that's having convictions.  But what I want is someone who, instead of having all the answers, wants to work to solve the problems.  Someone creative, hardworking, insightful, and compassionate.  Only then am I even willing to listen to their ideas on free trade, or foreign relations, or social security, or education.  \n\nCan you imagine hiring someone at any office in America based on the beliefs and opinions they already hold.  No, you hire based on their ability to do the work, their practical ideas, their sense of themselves, but even more so their adaptability to new situations that could arise.  Sadly, this isn't how candidates are elected, and it's to the detriment of the nation.
1133152
Right on man!  That's true true true.\n\nThe republicans stand for getting rid of the middle class only for the benefit of the rich.The dont know jack.\n\nThe Repuglicans dont believe in fair chance anything.\n\nSee you in November to clean effen house!
1073570
bunchik,,,, trying to figure out a republican like freetyme813 from the Reich wing of the Ann Coulter Christian fiscal conservative movement is a waste of time,,,, they have no conscience, their pure evil and hatred, hiding behind a veil of patriotism,,,, enemy of true patriots and American citizens,,, with an agenda of peace and liberty throughout the world without spreading HATE
925080
It was a way of making a point, Though this certain person has brought up the subject before, it is a way to deter Republicans from going to war by making it a possibility for those who come from all sorts of backgrounds be it rich or poor have to go fight as well. . Meaning Senators and Congressman's children to have to go no matter what. Well that's what i got from this news article. Read it and make your own opinion :)
1102287
Don't take him too seriously. He is Mr Truth and he is calling it as he sees it. Free speech should be encouraged not beaten down. At least you know what the man thinks and that is great. I suppose you don't agree with him?
962677
We have had, but are rapidly losing, freedom of speech in the UK. The PC brigade / humanists are in the process of stamping out all views contrary to their own, esp the historically dominant Christian worldview, upon which most of the free world was founded (USA and England are prime examples). The irony of all this is that it is done in the name of free speech / tolerance. However, they (the PC brigade) are the most intolerant of the lot as they do not tolerate views contrary to their own.  In practical terms, it goes like this: "We the PC brigade hereby declare that there are no absolutes and that there is no truth, except of course for the absolute truth that their are no absolutes. Accordingly, no religion or other worldview has the right to state that it is true to the exclusion of others, though we (the PC brigade) of course believe that OUR PC views are true to the exclusion of all others". The true threat to freedom is now the fundamental PC brigade. How ironic, don't ya think?
432194
Bush's Spying Plan just might get repealed by a free Democratic Congress in America this Fall. Our next worry is the Evangelist Conservative NEO_CON'S that are forcing the "CONSTITUTION RESTORATION ACT", That takes some more Civil Rights away, from the Bill of Rights, and the Constitution of the United States of America. Remember that NEO_CON'S can't seem to remember Richard Nixon's impeachment, and all the criminals going to prison. Nixon snitched on them to keep his rear out of prison, and America allowed him to resign for snitching.
662371
Democrats are against having your personal freedoms taken away from you, because you do not know how to properly use them. They are against having a caste system in this country. They believe that all people have the right to be heard and respected. They believe that in America, that those who are able should have they right to do. They believe that Government is by the people, for they people, not just the ones who can afford it, but all people should have an equal voice. The believe in the three major branches of Government, not that the President has the power to do whatever he deems is necessary at the time to promote his own agenda. Power to the People, not Power to the Government