this is about avogadro's law......?
956160
v1 / n1 = v2 / n2\n1.6 / 0.098 = v2 / 0.12\nv = 1.96\nwithout dimenesions as u write it .
822878
It's impossible to generate a perfect impulse voltage.\n\nIt's a mathematical thing to help engineers make the math work.
348603
It's a useful tool in electrical network analysis.\n\nAnother one is Kirchoff's law.
202746
Checkout what is being done with nanotechnology and building structures, Complex structures!, with dna strands!\n\nhttp://www.nature.com/nature/links/040212/040212-1.html\n\nIf it CAN and it can be measured imagine what can be done!\nalmost scary!
945352
Then defend it... I say that there is no way that a random chance process could have formed life forming proteins and DNA with their unique chirality. If proteins and DNA were formed by chance  each and every one of the components would be a 50/50 mixture of the two optical isomers. This is not what we see in natural proteins or in natural DNA. How can a random chance natural process create proteins with thousands of "L" molecules, and then also create DNA with billions of "R" molecules? Does this sound like random chance or a product of design? Even if \nthere were a magic process to introduce chirality, it would only create one isomer. If such a process existed, we do not know anything about it or how it would work. If it did exist, how were compounds with the other chirality ever formed? Even if there were two magical processes, one for each isomer, what determined which process  was used and when it was used, if this was a random chance natural process? The idea of two processes requires a controlling mechanism, and this kind of control is not possible in a random chance natural process.\nYou are an intelligent man alot smarter than a mere theist so I don't think I need to explain chirality more thoroughly. You just need to defend your statement... Too bad you can't now that you have this informant ion.....   Jim
629252
I understand your question- almost nobody undestands that kind of question; you put it very clearly.  It is easy to understand that the human mind and the number pi should have found eachother. And -273 Kelvin. And Avagadro's number. But e!  why e?  If someone can tell the Asker and me someting useful- please do.  I have looked at e from all sides now and I don't see where it fits intuitively into our world.  Explain without equations please! I'll as a question next.
731450
Faraday's law of Electromagnetic induction: refer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_induction\n\nThermodynamic processes: refer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamics
291328
In chemistry, balancing certain equations right can give you coefficients in the form 1+1=3, but that has to do with Avogadro's number.
241348
try:\n\n  \nFaraday constant  over Electron charge = Avogadro's number\n\n96,487 / 1.6022*10-19 = 6.022*10^23
692204
Just a minor nitpick on what others have said.  Electricity can also be the motion of holes, which can be thought of as the absense of an electron.  But generally it is the motion of electrons.
1086143
It's a law of electrical flow along a circuit.
1135665
The possibilities are infinite...You can see everything from the "al-bridge-a" of your ship...Just "Googol" it to find out!\nIf he had Avogadro's number, he could discover the mole who's spying on him...\nSee you later; I have a leftover piece of pi in the fridge...(Pi are squared?  No, pi are round!)
1044959
You know, MythBusters did an experiment on this once.\n\nhttp://kwc.org/mythbusters/2003/09/mythbusters.html\n\nRead the second bullet point.
111164
That is an assumption which cannot be proven. No one yet disproved it by showing 2 of the same.\n\nIf you consider the molecular scale, there's pretty much never 2 of the same of anything.  So I (as most people seem to) am referring to 2 of the exact same pattern.  There are infinitely many of possibilities, but there have been an awful lot of snowflakes to assume none have been the same.
805064
lol \nYou have homework that you don't know the answer to.  \n\nWhy would someone ask these here out of interest? Like you have these specific parameters and conditions that you are just raring to want to know just out of the blue.\n\n Quit wasting time writing and typing questions out waiting here for answers when you could be the next engineering graduate who actuallly UNDERSTANDS this stuff by doing it yourself.
74435
Try reading this, it should answer your question.\nhttp://phyun5.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node58.html
1018680
Faraday constant divide by Electron charge=Avogadro's number\n\n\n\n96.487/1.6022*10^-19 =6.022*10^23