which one of the following sentences has a compound predicate?
969841
It would be the sentence where the subject is doing more than one action. Which one do you think it is?
148557
A simple sentence is a sentence with one subject and one predicate. A simple sentence can stand by itself and make sense. Like these:\n\n"/We kissed/."\n"/I kissed/ her."\n"/I kissed/ her in the rain."\n\nThey all have one subject-and-predicate and stand on their own.\n-----\nA compound sentence has two or more subject-and-predicate sections (known as clauses). Both of the clasues could stand alone and make sense, but are being combined into one sentence. Like this one(from the source):\n\n"/Mary understands/ math ; /she has studied/ it for years."\n\nThe two clauses could stand alone, but are being combined in this sentence.\n-----\nA complex sentence also has two or more clauses. It has one independent clause. The rest are dependent on the first. For example:\n\n"/It was wet outside/, so /I put my coat on./"\n\nIf it wasn't wet outside, you would not have put your coat on. /I put.../ is dependent, while /It was.../ is independent.\n\nDid that make sense? Either way, just go to the sources I have. I can't explain anything.
896262
Grammatically, they're both correct.\n\nIf you're using this sentence in some kind of composition, your biggest problem is that the sentence has an inconsistent tone. The middle of the sentence has the sophisticated "atypical dialects," while the beginning and end are much more conversational and less descriptive.\n\nBut if you're asking me to pick, I would say the second.
577150
B.\n\nDo your homework.
270749
A is correct.\n\nAn adjectival clause usually begins with a relative pronoun, which makes the clause dependent. Common relative pronouns: that, which, who, whom, whose.
895270
d.  The way to tell when you have a compound noun is to remove the other noun E.g.  A)Please give I your undivided attention.  That makes no sense.  Only d does.
611775
Examples:\n\nFor 3 adjectives in a series: The syrup is thick, delicious, and sweet.\nFor two adjectives: The thick, sweet syrup is delicious.\nFor two with a conjuction: The syrup is thick and sweet.  \n\nComma between two adjectives most of the time.  With three, a comma after each, including before "and."
719448
You can use either when adding a qualifying clause afterwards.\n\n"I like the cat which is red"  "I like the cat that is red" both work. \n\nThat sounds a little more casual/natural.  Which sounds a bit more high brow formal.  \n\nThat can also double as a pronoun.  Avoid using the word "that" twice in a row however.  "That which is wrong"  vs "That that is wrong."
1098944
Compound W.  \n\nTried and true.\n\n(use only as directed)
585441
It is a predicate (verb) that contains two or more verbs. For example, "He is eating a sandwich." Is eating is a compound verb phrase. "He has been taking piano lessons." Has been taking. "I was given a beautiful scarf for my birthday." Was given. "I am hungry" Am is a simple predicate because there is only one verb in the predicate. \nAnd so on.
186597
It's a shame the asker didn't include more of the surrounding text from this article so it could be analyzed more closely.  \n\nAnyhow, grammarians will concur that the structure:  \n\n"...active surveillance and robust peer intervention among high-risk groups such as female sex workers had had an impact in the South..." ,\n\nIS, technically, correct.  Sacramento Dweller was correct in identifying this seemingly awkward grammatical structure as a matter of tense.  Sentences utilizing this particular structure generally fall under the category of "Conditional Sentences."  Sentences featuring the 'had had' syntax are classified as "The Third Conditional," or "Conditional Type Three," and can generally be diagnosed by analyzing them for similarities with following structural formulae:\n\n(The Type 3 Conditional / Third Conditional Formula:)\n\n" IF + <insert past perfect tense verb> + <insert perfect conditional tense verb> = RESULT OF SUPPOSED CONDITIONS.*\n\n*~NOTE:  RESULT(S) of the supposed conditions usually resemble one of the following two structures, depending on when events occurred:  \n\n(1.) Result:  <insert simple present or past tense verb to express an obvious, or predictable fact / outcome>\n\n(2.) Result:  <insert modal verb  + simple present or past tense verb to express a known fact / outcome >\n\nEXAMPLE #1:  "If you had had proper training as an assassin, we would not be in this situation..."\n\nEXAMPLE #2:  "If I'd had proper training as an assassin, you probably wouldn't be here to complain."\n\n(Notice how in EXAMPLE #2, the contractions 'I'd' is used instead of saying, 'I had had' to illustrate the terms of the condition being discussed, though still allowing the reader to ascertain and understand the time-frame and sequence in which events occcurred?)\n\nRules for proper usage of the "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure state that the structures are 'to be used when talking about unreal, or "hypothetical" situations occurring in the past.'  That means, the related events DID NOT 'ACTUALLY' HAPPEN in the past.  Sentences utilizing this structure are almost always phrased to reckon, "If circumstances were different, what could / would have this been like?"  \n\nThe expression of time / tense in this [third] variety of conditional sentence structure IS identified as the past, and indicates that an action was completed "in" the past.  The condition and / or result, therefore, cannot logically be fulfilled because the action in the "IF" clause never actually happened.  Action in "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure is almost ALWAYS characterized by the quality of being absurd, and impossible to achieve.\n\nTense and Terminology?\n\n-Simple Present Tense:  Expresses a fact, habit/routine, or ability.\n\n-Simple Past:  Implies that the action happened before and is not happening anymore.\n\n-Past Perfect (Pluperfect) Tense:  Relates that an action or event ended prior to another action or event.\n\n-Present Perfect (Continuous) [Past-composite] Tense:  Indicates either events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Perfect (Conditional) Tense: Relates varying degrees of certianty or uncertainty about events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Modal Verbs:  incorporated with other verbs to illustrate the notion of possibility, impossability, necessity or other degree of probability.
231907
A) Antecedent (also called referent)
689184
When I find out what it is you are asking, I might be able to help.\n\nLearn some grammar and proper sentence structure!
811980
Your sentence is good as it is.  The only word I would question is "also".  (I'm guilty of over-using it also!!)  I would remove it if it isn't necessary to the meaning of the sentence.  Best of luck.
1149709
There are two basic parts to a sentence: the subject part and the predicate part. The subject part contains the simple subject and all of its modifiers. The predicate part contains the verb and all of its modifiers.\n\nExample: Mary who is the girl who scored the winning  goal in the high school finals became a star in college three years later.\n\n"Mary who is the girl who scored the winning  goal in the high school finals" is the subject part of the sentence. Mary is the simple subject.\n\n"became a star three years later in college" is the predicate part of the sentence. Became is the verb of the sentence.\n\nThe subject part is what the sentence is about, and the predicate part makes a statement about the subject part.\n\nI hope this helps!!
698100
Yes, this is a correct use of "for" as a conjunction/glue word to make a compound sentence, but you need to insert a comma:\n\nHe is bighearted, for he loves me very much.\n\nWhen you join two independent clauses to\nform a compound sentence\nIf you use the words "and" "but" "or" "nor" "for" "yet" "so"\nthese require a comma before the conjunction/glue word.\n\nHe doesn't often show it, but he loves me very much.\n\nIf you use the words "however" "therefore" "otherwise"\nthese require a semi-colon before and a comma afterwards.\n\nHe doesn't often show it; however, he loves me very much.\n\nThe way to check if it is a compound sentence:\nif you remove the conjunction/glue word, both of the\nseparate clauses should stand on their own as complete sentences:\n\nHe is bighearted.\nHe loves me very much.
1071820
I think examples will illustrate this best.\n\nCOMPOUND SUBJECT. Bill and Gary went to the movies.\n                                          Mary and Beth graduated in June.\n\nBill and Gary is a compound subject as is Mary and Beth. \n\nCOMPOUND OBJECTS: The child threw the pail and shovel.\n                                           Grace kicked the chair and desk.\n\nPail and shovel are direct objects of the verb threw. Chair and desk are the direct objects of the verb kicked.\n\nMost compounds are joined by and, or, for, nor or but. However, they may also be joined by either/or, neither/nor, both/and, not only/but also.\n\nI hope this helps you.