is nonconsensual ballbusting outside the context of legitimate?
969778
"pretty much what I am hearing so far is that it is assault but does not measure up to the standard of sexual assault"=That is right, just one of many double standards against men!!!\nNot only it is not considered to be anything special, it is also considered very funny, that is why men don’t report those situations. Adding to natural embarrassment of sexual assault victim to report the sexual offences, there is the additional fact that it is considered to be funny.\n\n\nMOVIES, TV, COMMERCIALS, THEY ALWAYS MAKE BELIEVE THAT IT IS JUSTIFIED TO KICK SOMEONE IN THE PRIVATES FOR STUPID REASONS, AND IS FUNNY, AND IT ONLY HURTS BUT DO NOT CAUSE ANY DAMAGE(they use the “kick in the balls” to sell because it is something controversial, but then forget to make people believe that is a bad thing and that the person who did it was a villain in the movie, and then in real life others will pay the price). \nWomen think is funny and hot by nature, but men are brain washed to think is funny, and think not a big deal, with the big help of TV. That is why men sometimes laugh or hide their TRUE DEEP feelings about it.\n\nAnd btw, most women try to hide that they get sexual satisfaction from kicking men in the balls(to me that was always obvious), they only admit that it is funny. \nEven with the foot it is touching; and the laughing they make when they do it or see it happen it is not like the laughing when they laugh about a good joke, it is very different, it is the sexual aroused laughing that is natural on females when sexual aroused. Not to mention other facial, body and behaviour expressions that also indicates sexual arousal, which is their main motivation(other related motivations are enjoying “male only” PAIN done by a women, enjoying sexual HUMILIATION, and all those things are FUNNY).\nAnd I have many other prove of that, I have their opinions on surveys about this issue, I video interviews with random women on the streets and also professional “ballbusters”, they talk about their feelings and about the other girls feelings and also conversations with other girls with different ages(age do not matter, the always fell the same way about it, so the “immature” excuse is not valid), and they also talk about their and other girls experiences.
162041
The previous answer is not correct. Here is a link to the actual story. It involved a setup by one gang to put a hit on another. Staged as a bootleg alcohol buy.
986649
Isn't this called cheating?
274451
I see it as this. The users participating in e-fornification are probably unable to have sexual gratification in the real world, so they take their perversions into the online communities, and force us to watch them go "*oh baby oh baby*".\nPersonally, I want to puke in my soup when I see this. It's pointless, and proves nothing, other than SOME of them have some idea how to engage in sexual activities.
695416
You are being toyed with, from the way it sounds at least. I wouldn't put up with that. It is never fun to be at the butt end of someone else's game, whether it is a malicious one or not.
998552
Cristiano Ronaldo was the subject of allegations which were never proved and he was never charged with anything.  You should be more open minded about these kind of stories.  There are many cases of false rape allegations involving Premiership footballers.  There is undoubtedly no smoke without fire, but with the media offering 5 or 6 figure sums of money for these kind of stories then there is always the motivation for some deranged person to concoct a rape scenario that never occurred.
489481
I think that many more people fantasize about illegal acts than actually do those things. In this, the Internet seems like a safe place to allow those fantasies some room. But for some of those people 'playing' at it, it starts to seem more and more possible. And their fantasies start to cross the line from mental games to actual crimes.\n\nI don't think it should be a crime for some poor slob who is otherwise a straight arrow to flirt with a 45 year old vigilante posing as a 13 year old. And I do think any 13 year old who actually flirts with an on-line predator has some measure of guilt also.
223231
In some cases it is legitimate.  These are cases in which there is a clear threat being posed, often with WMD's.  In the case of Iraq, however, military action meet none of the criteria for legitimate preemptive military action.  There was no valid threat, and the invasion was illegitimate.  Each case should be evaluated independently.  To claim that all preventive strikes are legitimate or no preventive strikes are paints an unrealistic picture of the world.
14171
In most states, that would NOT be legal, it would be considered a sexual assualt in some jurisdictions.\nIn any case, you do not want to give this person a valid reason to say terrible things if someone asks for a reference, or to file a complaint with law enforcement.\nLet it go.
1103062
Yes you can slap the ball.. It's part of the game to be able to steal the ball. It doesn't matter whether it's two handed or one. But yes it is legal as long as you don't foul by making contact.
1142409
not necessarily, harassment can be entirely verbal (e.g. saying "nice boobs"). Moreover, "inappropriate touching" is not violence either since there is no physical damage.\n\nbut presumably if sexual harassment is left unchecked, it could escalate into more serious things - like sexual assault (rape) and plain violence.
218060
No, it's not illegal.\n\nNo, it should not be illegal.
317788
Yes a few time....some kids played it off (tickle By girl used to be considered affection maybe but when the tickling is harassment/non warranted only the ignorant would laugh.  It's like demeaning the kid, trying to dominate another thru himiliation and thats plain bulling...In the grow up world it is call Abuse.  I Remember playing hero once whe I saw a kid from school being tosssed aorungd a tickle cirle by the bigger boys and he's already had an accident. I skipped up to them and stareting talking over bullies heads and distracted them enough that we got a great head start.   Oh and left 2 of the Big MACHO's standing in the middle of the park bad set of Woodies. and a bag of skittles in there hand.
528391
Although I'm a firm believer in freedom of speech I find it quite disturbing that people don't have a problem with using this word in front of anybody, at any time.\nIt negates any sign of intelligence that you would not find it in your vocabulary to communicate disgust, anger and other emotions without resorting to a word that literally means fornicate or sexual intercourse. Aren't our brains a little more evolved than that?\nIf you want to use it, you have the right, but other people have the right NOT to hear it everywhere!
648681
it is immoral but not illegal
113040
I would probably still support the team, unless what was said could be deemed unforgivable. Personally, I have always been of the mind that actions speak louder than words, and what is said under the heat of the moment must be taken into context and perhaps even forgiven in some situations.  However, if the offenses turn into a pattern and nothing is done to correct the behavior i would certainly not lend my support to the team until the problem was resolved.  Hope this helps.
667055
Taking advantage of somebody isn't against the law, unless you are talking about sexual molestation. If that is what you mean, then you absolutely need to call the police. Otherwise, if you are talking about someone, say, making you buy their dinner all the time, that isn't illegal. Immoral maybe, but not illegal.