Should couples have children out of the wedlock?
954792
According to today's moral standards many people think it's not necessary to be married when having children. But I disagree. A marriage means stability. It means commitment between two people. If they really love each other it should not be a problem to be married. My personal opinion is that couples who don't want to get married are just not that into each other and should therefore not have children.
591219
I don’t care what state your in young marriage is a bad idea.  You kids love a person one day, and then in a few months change your mind.  You’re not ready to deal with the same person everyday until you DIE.  Why do you think the devoice rate in the country is so high?????\n\nMarriage sounds so romantic until your trapped and no longer happy with your wife. \n\n Go enjoy being a kid!!!
781092
If both the people are mature and don't worry about what their family thinks or the people around them, then yes I think it can work. But then again it's not good to be unequally yoked if religion is important to both the people involved, because that could lead to serious problems for the parents and the children.
508654
Yes and no based on why those events took place. Marriage appears to be the way of life in the society so most of us are getting married. That is the divine way to continue the  life cycle. Divorce is a result of modern civilization. If purpose of life is to have peaceful life and then for some divorce may be a solution.
849163
I have 2 kids and would love more.Unfortunately my partner can't have kids.I have accepted it.We would have liked our own child,but he treats mine as his own.
538294
Yes. Otherwise, couples would go their seperate ways when things got hard, instead of making it work. Marriage is a rational decision you make to be with 1 person, even if it gets hard. Think about a world full of broken homes, with only one parent. That would be reality without marriage.
142736
yes they are most likely to divorce or have children out of wedlock . . . because that is what they learned from their parents.\n\nthey are also more likely to lie and be dishonest and go to prision too . . .
133807
No, because whoever has the children has to establish some kind of stability for them.  I'm not saying you should not have any rights, but think of the kids first.
438043
Those that have kids first...feel they HAVE to get married, while those that get married first, then have kids...actually WANTED to get married....
341901
As long as you are just dating, yes, the child gets more attention and love.  However, in a marriage, the spouse MUST come first.  This is the main problem with marriages today - putting the kids ahead of the spouse.  Why should you stay with someone who doesn't care about you and pay attention to you????  I love my children dearly and hope one day they have wonderful, sucessful, loving marriages of their own.  This will make my husband and I happiest - to not sacrifice our marriage for our kids sake.
910841
What's so wrong with a child born out of wedlock?\n\nMy son is a year old.\n\nI am not married.\n\nF*ck off.
612749
not under any circumstance - you will ruin the kids life if they are not brought up in a  proper family environment and sex before marriage is immoral and well having sex the first time on your wedding night makes it special for both - I would hold back till then
419627
It is not necessary.  In the traditional sence the two people would wait to have s e x untill after marriage.  Marriage is the ultimate commitment and s e x is theultimate form of physical love, so the two have just become a pair.
236273
You should get married only after you figure out what YOU want out of life.  It's hard to keep someone else happy when you don't know how to keep yourself happy.  Children should only come from a stable, loving home.  So, kids come a few years after marriage, but many couples don't have kids at all.
416505
If they are constantly fighting or even if there is just constant tension then that's worse for the kids in the long run.\n\nIf they are happier apart then it will be better in the long run for the kids. I just wish people would think more seriously about the state of their relationships before leaping into having children.
284304
Isn't two enough? Do you really want to contribute to the world's population problem? Any more than two is a selfish act in my humble opinion (unless it was an accident). If every couple had only two children, the world population would remain constant. Live by example. Concentrate your resources into making the two children you have into the best possible humans they can be. Don't dilute your resources on more kids than that. It's not fair to them.
93940
I think any marraige, teen or not, just for the sake of a child are setting the couple up for failure. Eventually, there will come a time in their lives where one person (usually the man) who feels resentment for giving up his freedom because of a child. Most people who marry because of a child don't even fully love the person they are marrying. Now this isn't to say that teen marraiges don't work out... I'm just saying the cards are stacked against them and they have to work hard TOGETHER to get through and prove the world wrong.