MI5 latest comments on terror?
959976
Yes, I read the comment from the director of MI5.  I believe it is plausable.  As far as solutions, we as the public ar limited, I mean really the majority of muslims are alright, it's just the fanatics.  Should we punish them all, for actions of the few? No. However, I do feel that the muslim community in general, should take a little more pro-active approach to encouraging this type of behaviour to stop.  They should denounce hate pedalers and encourage prosecution of people who incite violence against people who don't follow their religion.  They have done this on a few occasions but more is needed.  MI5 says they are following 1600 people, good, hopefully any plots should be foiled.  If there are more bombings, it will get alot worse for muslims in the UK.  As far as apologies and running away from Iraq, that's not a solution.  Those are chicken sh*t tactics, and is exactly what the fundamentalists want, so they can spew more hate fueled rhetoric, calling the west heartless, weak, scared, defeated, and call for the destruction of the zionist empire next.  Blah,Blah,Blah.  All we can do, is remain vigilent in our own communities and rely on spy agencies to do their job.  After all, they already took away our fire arms, so we have to leave any response to the government.
729966
can you site this... or are you using secret terrorist sources that you have?\n\nI would assume it's that they want to blow up Europe and America?\n\ncall me crazy...
271834
Yup. Go after 'em and put 'em on the defensive. We are making alot of progress against the terrorists, but you wouldn't know it by watching CBS or CNN. Nevermind what the news says, ask the people who have been there and have had their mission completely misrepresented by the liberal press and liberal politicians. Our troops are kickin' butt! When was the last hit against us? I say keep 'em busy over there!
1049917
It's only been out for a week (and not yet arrived in my town). I will probably see it, if I have the stomach for it.\n\nFolks who think this is some 'liberal' propaganda or 'food for terrorists' - just put yourself in this scenario: You're going to a friend's wedding overseas. While you're there, the U.S. is attacked. Suddenly, now you're determined to be in a 'terrorist country.' You're rounded up - even though you're a U.S. citizen - on suspicion of terrorism, for no reason except that you're in the wrrong place at the wrong time. You're imprisoned for 3 years, tortured, never charged with any crime, nor ever given a trial. Three years of your life are lost, and then suddenly you're set free. No apologies, no explanations, no remorse from "your government." You never find out why.\n\nHow do you feel? Find some compassion for these people. That's what happened to them.\n\nThe movie sounds harrowing but important. This is what Time magazine wrote:\n\n"IF the movie's remorseless depiction of this nightmare doesn't shock audiences into numbness - 'United 93' is a Hallmark card compared with this horror show - they may be inspired by the stubborn bravery of Iqbal and his friends. Documents like this are supposed to open our eyes, even if we would rather shut them to the awful realities on view."
168616
Why do they feel that way?  Because obviously it works...  \n\nJust think how a statement like "Yahoo Answers has people who are sending coded terrorist messages" will cause a bunch of people to freak out..
542352
I looked at that comment from Emily, and that's some SCARY crap! And her questions--and especially her answers DO look bogus! OOOOH--I'm almost flattered that they would waste their time like that on us "subversives"!  Hope you don't get discouraged--i.e., don't let the "terrorists" win!
1144230
After numerous rounds of "We don't even know if Osama is still alive," Osama himself decided to send George Bush a letter in his own handwriting to let him know he was still in the game.\n\nBush opened the letter and it appeared to contain a single line of coded message:\n\n370H-SSV-0773H\n\nBush was baffled, so he e-mailed it to Condi Rice. Condi and her aides had no clue either, so they sent it to the FBI.\n\nNo one could solve it at the FBI so it went to the CIA, then to the NSA.\n\nWith no clue as to its meaning they eventually asked Britain's MI-6 for help. Within a minute MI-6 cabled the White House with this reply "Tell the President he's holding the message upside down
1156672
It's Scottland Yard, not MI5. MI5 only deal with matters out side of the U.K. Like the CIA.
703167
The worrying thing is that this has actually happened - some numbskulls on a council estate attacked the home of a female paediatrician.\n\nMakes you despair of this country, doesn't it?\n\nYou know what - I actually feel EMBARRASSED for the twats that took this seriously. Wake up to yourselves, FOOLS!
1083930
another terrorist attack and there wouldn't be many left... that would FINALLY prove that their polices have did little to deter terror... the only "evidence" they have is that we haven't had another attack... lack of action is FAR from actual evidence... \n\nI hope it doesn't happen, but based on Bush's ineffective strategies, I fear it's inevitable and I'm scared...\n\nbungiebabe: \nA. there is no "pass" on the SAT tests, just a score...\nB. judging from what she says... the lower you scored on the SAT... the more you probably like her...\n\nhmm?: you should make a question out of all those quotes... ask how much all the Republicans love all these quotes... hahaha
911964
this is presumably a joke, if you have information about a terror suspect go to the police, if not then just stop being an idiot.
758131
Actually they are a security issue. I'm guessing you have never heard of operational security. \n\nDetails on what they tried to exploit, details on who was all involved and the intelligence that comes with it. You do hear about the information 6 months or more later, but when it actually goes down, it's kept under wraps until the persons and situation involved are fully examined.\n\nWe don't need copy cats nor unnecessary panic and we need to exploit intelligence without the enemy's fully knowing we are.
1042800
As of the 22nd of June we are at ELEVATED (1to 5 is alevel 3).\n "At this time, there is no credible intelligence to suggest a specific or imminent threat to the homeland."\nYou can get more info in the below website.\nhttp://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?theme=29
970070
Generally, the BBC is one of the worlds most trusted news agencies, due to its independent funding by the tv license, unlike those news agencies owned by individuals like Rupert Murdoch and his Fox network.\nThis report only raised the question of the presence of CIA agents at the venue before, after and during Bobby Kennedys speech. It states that Bobby was clearly assassinated by someone close behind him, yet there was no evidence of the 3 agents being that close to Bobby, at any stage. Whilst their presence may seem suspicious, it may be a case that the CIA were aware of a potential threat. As to the claim that the CIA would not assign an agent who did not like the Kennedys to investigate such suspicions, or to protect one of them; this is absurd. I have worked for the British Civil Service, and you are expected to put personal ideologies aside, and do your job professionally. CIA agents, like their British Intelligence counterparts can not cherry-pick their assignments. Many Brits do not like the way Israel behaves as a country, and would prefer not to protect Israeli Ministers, but do so, because it is their job. Earlier this year there was an outcry because an Islamic police officer was relieved from protecting the Israeli Embassy during the Lebanon invasion. This would not have been an issue for our Military Intelligence staff, just as fighting a war is not a soldiers choice.\nThis research raised some interesting questions about Intelligence work, but gave no new evidence regarding the assassination.\nIt is a great shame that Bobby Kennedy was killed, as he was the best Kennedy in politics, and would have been an excellent President, both domestically and internationally.
946220
I hope so.\n\nBTW. You responded to my question about .. . Is terrorism too unsavory for some to admit it's existence.....\n\nYour answer was PERFECT. I tried to email you, but not accessible. I wanted to ask you to post a question, using the link to  Obsession........\n\nI've done it many times. I just think that it would be good if OTHERS posted that question as well . Thank you.
1131816
Sayed Rahmatullah Hashemi, \nthe former Taliban ambassador-at-large. \nwho is now studying at Yale, also played a cameo role in Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9-11" cleverly constructed propaganda attack against President Bush. \n\nTo be honest with you its the first time i have heard about this story. Seems to me that Yale has made a bit of a Blunder. But i dare say that he is being watched very carefully. like the old saying goes "Better the devil you, know than the devil you don't"\nAnd i would also like to think if the UK Prime Ministers son attends Yale he will have full Protection.\n\nHey crazy D. \nWho the hell made you god. that you can just insult people on this site when ever the mood takes you. Does your Mother know that you are messing about with her computer. maybe instead of being such an asshole you should take your medicine and go beddy bye's.
779876
The folks at the Pentagon no longer let me sit in on the intelligence briefings.  I do know that Iraq did not cause 911, and nobody in the government has ever said it did.  I don't know where this inaccurate info came from .  Why would you think you would be in the loop in regards to the status on bin laden?  Don't you think that the fewer the people know what's going on, the better chances we have in catching him off guard?