Did Burns concede the Montana race?
968801
He conceded!  \n\nDidn't have a small enough margin to call for a recount. And Allen is due to concede, as well, so it's officially a Democratic majority in the Senate!
48104
I dont think so, but he eventually became chief justice of the supreme court...he never really wanted to be president, however his bid for election for a second term was disrupted by his predecessor and the bull-moose party
1042776
Not any more.  I think the Alaska land grant program has been discontinued.
264375
They truly do exist. There are 7 or 8 in Montana.\nThe Federal Government made all the indians move or settle down on land the government picked and to live there for the rest of history. The land was really poor land with (the government thought) no minerals nor could it be farmed as the soil was too thin or too poor. Their original hunting grounds were seldom within within the lands set for them.
759218
Nope.  He got thumped only getting 34% of the vote.
906626
From NBC's Lisa Daniels\nPennsylvania's Republican Party says it has filed an official complaint with the state government, alleging failures in voting machines. One aide to Republican Sen. Rick Santorum just told me they believe "hundreds" of votes are affected by these machine malfunctions.\n\nThe complaint claims that votes for Santorum were not counted - that they were either met with a "malfunction" signal or incorrectly cast as votes for Democratic challenger Bob Casey. Santorum's aides say they are waiting for an official response from the state.\n\nThe response from Casey's campaign? The Democrats say there is no evidence of voting problems, aside from one or two isolated incidents unrelated to Santorum's claims. One said privately that the complaints were "an early attempt to explain away a Casey victory."\n\nMeanwhile, the Santorum camp contends that the most commonly cited polls, showing Casey with a double-digit lead over Santorum, are inaccurate. "Get ready for his grassroots campaign to kick in ... and we will win," one campaign official said. \n\nCasey's folks say they are very happy with the voter turnout, especially in the Philly suburbs. Stay tuned...
1149806
Sir Charles Tupper, for 69 days from 1 May 1896 to 8 July 1896.\n\nHe finished out Sir Mackenzie Bowell's term in office. Bowell stepped down because of his unpopularity concerning the Manitoba Schools Question (about language rights in the new province of Manitoba). Tupper became Prime Minister but was swept out of office in the election.\n\nPoor guy!\n\nStill, his time in office was twice as long as William Henry Harrison of the USA.
622465
He should have retired at the top, not wait like Joe Montana did..
704815
It was already planned a week ago.  If the Demo's won, he was out.  If the Republicans retained power, he was to stay.
761093
Yeah, Ashley left :(. He could still get far...sometimes the losers are the real winners.
813045
Peronally, I think Allen should concede.  I don't think I've ever seen a recount in which the initial vote was overturned.  Maybe Florida (2000), but I don't think anyone came right out and said Gore won the state.  They were saying it's "too close to call" on election night 2000.  \n\nFrom what I've seen, recounts cost a lot of money, and diminish people's confidence in the political process.  For those reasons, I don't like them.\n\nAt the same time, I can understand why somebody who supports Allen would want a recount.  With an election so close, you want to be extra positive that every vote was counted and the winner actually won.
645005
His last race was at NHIS...New Hampshire International Speedway and approximately 24 hours after the race. I was at that race and am honored to have seen him in his last race ever...Even though Rusty Wallace won.....
919717
Yes, it was just made official. Mr. Webb won the Senate race in Virginia--which gives the Democrats control of Senate and the House. I understand that in Montana, Mr. Tester, the Democrat, remains in the lead.\n\nWe live in interesting times!
724348
I'm going to tell it straight, the reason Harold Ford Jr. lost is because he's a person of color running in a generally exclusive and racist state. Besides the major cities such as Memphis, Nashville and Knoxville, he really never had a chance. Stay away from red states. Here's a couple of "upstanding republicans" from TN for ya :)\n\nhttp://home.nycap.rr.com/tomtomtom/hillbilly.jpg
911819
No one yet.  It is going to a recount along with the Lt. Governor.
822108
Montana also has a democratic governor...they are a practical, thoughtful folk who appreciate the fact that democrats represent all citizens...this is going to be the trend...the western/mountain states are shifting into the d column while all the nut job evangelicals and racists are embracing the republican agenda in the south
906699
He submitted to governance before he got the truth. Military disregard does not work and he would have been squashed like a bug. I am sure that the Dem's bailed him out. Like that career dem he hired for hired inner circle. Wife Shriver Is a Kennedy and they have action in CA. This may be the first dual party Governor in history.