It's a given that Condi Rice has little integrity as evidenced by her blind support for Duhbya, your thoughts?
970324
I don't believe integrity and Condenscencion Rice are in the same frame of reference.
751818
Not incompetent criminal... and how about that lie under oath .. "we could never in our wildest imaginations thought of a jetliner being used as a weapon" ?\n\nbut this all assumes that she somehow holds cards in this hand.. she doesn't. She reported what she knew which is of course redundant because the Prez, Vice Prez, and Secretary would have all been briefed on the same Intel..\n\nthey should all be tried for treason and war crimes relating there in.
728247
If Carrie is smart, she won't say anything about it at all.\nI can't believe how unprofessional Faith was!\n\nFor those who haven't seen the video, here it is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyZRiEJnIag
504015
About a month ago Sheehan was on the Al Frankin show. I was at the live broadcast. She didn't really mention her son. She spoke for about 5-10 mins. about Bush starting an illegal war for oil, oil profits, hate for Haliburton, she even stated "I don't blame the people who killed my son for his death, I blame Bush for his death."  As I listened to her rant, never did she elaborate on any topic. She never explained how she arrived at any conclusion.  Never gave any facts, proof, or sources for her claims.  \nI learned that she was paid apx. $3000 plus travel to show up and speak.  When she started talking politics and turned the focus off her son's ultimate sacrifice, the left probably said enough, making absurd baseless claims about the war is our job. She is now urging Canada to welcome US deserters.\nSay a prayer for her son Casey and the rest of the troops.
564586
Although her heart is in the right place, I do not believe she has the ability to run this country. Other than her support of the lower classes in third world countries, what experience does she have with foreign affairs? America would definitely be put on the defense against foreign enemies, and she would not have the know how of what to do. She is a wonderful woman who needs to keep doing what she is doing, but she needs to live politics to the politicians. She isn't mean enough to run a country.
1155992
Are we not yet disgusted with the shameless political games of our present `statesmen' and `stateswomen'.....think about it!  This power-hungry fiend of a female (prove able by her own actions, thank you!) does not ride off into retirement with her whore hound hubby.  Nor does she go home and work in politics from that state......oh, no, she goes to a state where they not only do not know her, but will elect her simply because she is the embodiment of their self-destructive liberalism.  Why did she not return to Arkansas? Probably because they did not want the sleazy, dirty Clinton Clan to bring anymore disdain for their state.  You want someone like this to stand in leadership for you?  Not me!  I want a NON-politician, honest, just, caring, and courageous.......and sad to say, right now, I do not recognize any of the names being considered in 2008 to have any of those traits....that would be why I am hanging onto my bottle of strychnine laced pills.
235681
It would depend on her running mate, who she's running against, etc.  Best I can say is maybe.  What I can say with certainty is that anyone with close ties to the current administration wouldn't get my vote.
133798
I think the Bush administration has an agenda that the general public would not agree with if they knew the truth. What appears to be incompetance is actually just little bits of the truth that seep out from time to time. They are for big business and big money and anything that helps these two constituents. Its seems to me that every decision they make is in the pursuit of this goal.
837537
Its a toss up Hilary Clinton, or Condi Rice (spelled wrong). I would not vote for Hilary, but I would vote for Miss Rice. She is awesome+intelligent+retains knowledge of things that happened years ago. I hope she does run. I wouldn't vote for Bush's side of the family anymore. Sorry to be so blunt. I have been answering questions all day....LOL....
671839
NO NO NO\n\nshe did a lousy job the last time she was in office
634607
She has to reflect the policies of the President.  She is  a traveling "mouth-piece" of the USA President.  She is not allowed to say anything that is not approved of by the President and his advisors.... She is a puppet for the President.  If you can't trust her... it is because she has to reflect the policies that come down to her from the Oval Office.
990399
CHEATING?\n\nOK, I didn't have read much of the article before I knew I didn't have go any further.  There's a big flaw in this argument, the DEMS do it too!\n\nThat's right, when a Republican voter comes to the table, Democrats scrutinize in the same way.  It's a two-sided game that's been going on for decades.  This is nothing new.  Many Republicans after losses in the past complained about the same thing.  He said, She said.  That's all it is.\n\nRemember, you have democrats that target a specific voting pool, going out on election day and rounding as many black, hispanic, and poor americans as they can to vote against the Republican nominee.  Now, I didn't read the rest of that article, but does it mention both sides of the issue?  I'd be surprised if you ever got a "fair and balanced" report out of that mag about anything...
583450
Personally, I don't even think the democrats will let her get past the primaries.  There are a lot of places in this country that are still a few years behind, and aren't ready for a woman.  On top of that, I really think that there is a lagre majority of women who hold her in contempt for going back to a man that publicly humiliated her.  It's obvious that everything she says and does is political positioning...painfully obvious.  Most importantly though, we're dealing with some strong minded, very conservative leaders in the Middle East, primarily Iran and people like Kim Jong Il and I tend to think that a blonde haired, blue eyed woman wouldn't gain an ounce of respect from people like that.  \n\nThere are too many variables right now for a woman to be president...if it were a different time though, I'd vote for Condi first.
761587
Let's see, she basically had the swing vote on Iraq, and chose to shun Colin Powell. Yeah, she's an f'n genius. \n\nOh, and then when Katrina hit, her response was to spend the day shoe shopping in New York. Real inspired leadership. \n\nAnyone who thinks anyone tied to this administration has any chance of ever being president needs to put down the crack pipe.
100508
Your obviously an Idiot.  Condi Rice is from the US (Alabama if you want to be specific).  Whats wrong, does it bother that this black woman is more powerful and intelligent than you?
863768
I think the Democrats would be pretty foolish to put Hillary on the ticket.  Like Bob Dole in 1996, she appeals ONLY to her solid base, and nobody outside of that set would vote for her.  She doesn't have the assets of her husband.  Bill is a creative thinker, she is a rote thinker.  Beyond the charm, Bill can actually talk policy details and policy theory.  Hillary can only speak in platitudes (e.g. - "Our children are our future...").  Despite his ambition, Bill comes across as a likeable guy, she comes across as a power-grubbing witch.  Bill seems real, she seems contrived (for instance, the "right" turns she has taken in the Senate).  Her "concern" and "caring" seem false.  For example, several years ago when asked how small businesses would be able to afford "Hillary-Care," she snapped, "I can't be responsible for every under-capitalized business in this country!"  Many snipes such as this will come back to haunt her.  Up to this point, she has never been a national candidate and hasn't had any obligation to explain her role in any scandals.  I'm sure she will have to be forthcoming about how she managed to defy laws of economics, mathematics and the Securities Exchange Commission by trading in cattle futures (and that's just for starters).  Assuming Republican results were tainted by scandal this season, Democrats would be wise to put someone else in the general election.
80403
Not only NO but H--- NO! I would vote for a woman president though as long as she was qualified. I hope Condi Rice runs!