only two years ago bush couldnt name a single mistake he had made....do you think he could think of any today?
970725
You are forgiven for wetting yourself.\n\nA lot of Repuiblicans wet themselves also last night\n\nHe could name a few,but wont admit it.
684390
You forgot....\n\nc) Worst President Ever!
452245
no way, bush was stupid to do iraq, we should not go any where  else. bush is the worst president we ever had.
329048
Nope.  He's been a terrible President.  It's depressing to think what a truly great and brave President could have done after 9/11.  He could have united the world behind us and we could have tackled all kinds of tough problems.  Bush squandered all that with his stupid war, divisive politics and reckless budget policies.  Worst President ever?  Bottom 5 for sure!!!!!!!!!!
858706
I don't get it, maybe he bothced it back then too?\n\nFunny thing, he sort of apologized yesterday but the 1972 quote seems to be the same thing he said a few days ago, and the 1972 statement doesn't seem to be directed at Bush either.
663145
Dear Friend,\n\nRight on!  Bush screws us again.\n\nYour Friend,\nFrancesois
1090554
I think 2 shorter terms of 3 years would be wiser.  The present president is clearly a madman - I know the entire country can't be held responsible for his actions (as well as lack of actions in times of crises), but I just cannot comprehend how this could have happened!
1103980
I love how the best that most people can come up with is that he is dumb or stupid..............at least if you are going to take a position know why.  I don't agree with everything that George Bush has done.  I hate that he can't admit that we have been in Iraq for way too long or that our budget is in a major state of crisis, however, I think that he has lead this country in a direction that he though was right and that he has lead this country through some of the hardest times that we have ever had.....and if you hate President Bush so much, than maybe you will get passionate about your right to vote.
897945
I must have blinked..\nI was too concerned with the murders of over 650,000 innocents, rising oil prices, nearly 100 troops killed each month, pedophiles, gays in the closet, \n\nAND Bush rejected by his own party candidates like a pest. Only a stupid starts a war not being sure he'll win it. Serves him well
977353
I would have demanded a recount on the election of 2000, for every one period, I am sure that Bush would have lost, Florida was complaining that it would cost to much of tax payers money to redo it, How much is this war costing us now, and all the innocence people there loosing their homes and families, and the children loosing their mother and father, Remember Bush had a hard time finding Nations to back him up!! Yes the world trade center would probably still been attacked, but remember NOT ONE IRAQI was on those planes!!!!!!!!!
1105117
I acknowledge Bush has made errors. Contrary to the beliefs of some, he IS human (and NOT possessed).  I agree though, that he is a sincere man.  He has been forced into decisions that history will judge.  I hope for all our sakes, that they are the right ones.
885359
Yes, and how many different stories has he contrived to try and explain it off. First it was meant for Bush, no apology. Then it was I misquoted from my notes, no apology. Then it was someone else changed my notes, I misspoke and apologize kinda. \n\nhttp://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-pOypG0szd7Pv_X1rQxw_4qCWpA--?cq=1
151892
Katrina.  Barely, but he did admit the mistake with Katrina.  He kinda had to.  Other than that he has admitted NOTHING.  I would say he is overdue in admitting mistakes.
1055860
yes\n\nDuring a prime time press conference on April 13, President Bush was asked to name a mistake that he has made since taking office and what he has learned from it. Bush, who was unable to answer the question, admitted "maybe I'm not as quick on my feet as I should be in coming up with [a mistake]." But weeks later, Bush still hasn't answered the question. In the interest of assisting the President with this surprisingly difficult task we've compiled this list of 100 mistakes he has made since taking office:\n\nIraq\n\n1. Failing to build a real international coalition prior to the Iraq invasion, forcing the US to shoulder the full cost and consequences of the war.\n\n2. Approving the demobilization of the Iraqi Army in May, 2003 – bypassing the Joint Chiefs of Staff and reversing an earlier position, the President left hundreds of thousands of armed Iraqis disgruntled and unemployed, contributing significantly to the massive security problems American troops have faced during occupation.\n\n3. Not equipping troops in Iraq with adequate body armor or armored HUMVEES.\n\n4. Ignoring the advice Gen. Eric Shinseki regarding the need for more troops in Iraq – now Bush is belatedly adding troops, having allowed the security situation to deteriorate in exactly the way Shinseki said it would if there were not enough troops.\n\n5. Ignoring plans drawn up by the Army War College and other war-planning agencies, which predicted most of the worst security and infrastructure problems America faced in the early days of the Iraq occupation.\n\n6. Making a case for war which ignored intelligence that there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq.\n\n7. Deriding "nation-building" during the 2000 debates, then engaging American troops in one of the most explicit instances of nation building in American history.\n\n8. Predicting along with others in his administration that US troops would be greeted as liberators in Iraq.\n\n9. Predicting Iraq would pay for its own reconstruction.\n\n10. Wildly underestimating the cost of the war.\n\n11. Trusting Ahmed Chalabi, who has dismissed faulty intelligence he provided the President as necessary for getting the Americans to topple Saddam.\n\n12. Disbanding the Sunni Baathist managers responsible for Iraq's water, electricity, sewer system and all the other critical parts of that country's infrastructure.\n\n13. Failing to give UN weapons inspectors enough time to certify if weapons existed in Iraq.\n\n14. Including discredited intelligence concerning Nigerian Yellow Cake in his 2003 State of the Union.\n\n15. Announcing that "major combat operations in Iraq have ended" aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln on May 1, 2003, below a "Mission Accomplished" banner – more U.S. soldiers have died in combat since Bush's announcement than before it.\n\n16. Awarding a multi-billion dollar contract to Halliburton in Iraq, which then repeatedly overcharged the government and served troops dirty food.\n\n17. Refusing to cede any control of Post-invasion Iraq to the international community, meaning reconstruction has received limited aid from European allies or the U.N.\n\n18. Failing to convince NATO allies why invading Iraq was important.\n\n19. Having no real plan for the occupation of Iraq.\n\n20. Limiting bidding on Iraq construction projects to "coalition partners," unnecessarily alienating important allies France, Germany and Russia.\n\n21. Diverting $700 million into Iraq invasion planning without informing Congress.\n\n22. Shutting down an Iraqi newspaper for "inciting violence" – the move, which led in short order to street fighting in Fallujah, incited more violence than the newspaper ever had.\n\n23. Telling Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan about plans to go to war with Iraq before Secretary of State Colin Powell.\n\nCounterterrorism\n\n24. Allowing several members of the Bin Laden family to leave the country just
191667
Indirectly I think maybe he did, with what happened with 9/11 and how Bush handled it.  I never looked at something like that.
1107087
He can't help it. He has a 91 IQ like most of his followers!!\n\n"Well, I quit drinking in '86." \n—Bush, when asked whether, as he embarked on his second four-year term, he saw ghosts of past presidents. (C-SPAN interview, Jan. 30, 2005) \n\nBut the press has footage of him drunk on his as_!!!\n\n_________________________________________________\n\n"Gosh, I just don't think I ever said I'm not worried about Osama bin Laden. It's kind of one of those exaggerations."\n—Bush, during the final presidential debate, attempting to refute Kerry’s claim that the president boasted he was not concerned about Osama bin Laden. \n\n"So I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that much time on him... We haven't heard much from him. And I wouldn't necessarily say he's at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don't know where he is. I- I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him."\n—Bush, answering a question about Osama bin Laden at a March 13, 2002 news conference.\n\n---------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n"And as a result of the United States military, Taliban no longer is in existence."\n—Bush, demonstrating a weak grasp on reality at a campaign stop in Springfield, Ohio on Sept. 27, 2004. \n\n___________________________________________________\n\n"I don't speak ill of anybody in the process here. I think if you went back and looked at my comments, you will see I don't attack." \n—Bush, in the same interview. (The Washington Post reported on Feb. 20 that the Bush re-election campaign will spend "tens of millions of dollars" on a negative ad campaign focusing on the likely Democratic nominee, Sen. John Kerry.) \n__________________________________________________\n\n"We hold dear what our Declaration of Independence says, that all have got uninalienable rights, endowed by a Creator."\nSource: The New York Times, "Reporter's Notebook; Skipping Borders, Tripping Diction," David E. Sanger, May 28, 2002 \n\nAll except all the rights he's violated and is now trying to find a way around his latest loss at the Supreme Court!\n__________________________________________________\n\nLIE : "The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program ... Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons." -- President Bush, Oct. 7, 2002, in Cincinnati.\n\nFACT: This story, leaked to and breathlessly reported by Judith Miller in the New York Times, has turned out to be complete baloney. Department of Energy officials, who monitor nuclear plants, say the tubes could not be used for enriching uranium. One intelligence analyst, who was part of the tubes investigation, angrily told The New Republic: "You had senior American officials like Condoleezza Rice saying the only use of this aluminum really is uranium centrifuges. She said that on television. And that's just a lie."\n___________________________________________________\n\nLIE  "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." -- President Bush, Jan.28, 2003, in the State of the Union address.\n\nFACT: This whopper was based on a document that the White House already knew to be a forgery thanks to the CIA. Sold to Italian intelligence by some hustler, the document carried the signature of an official who had been out of office for 10 years and referenced a constitution that was no longer in effect. The ex-ambassador who the CIA sent to check out the story is pissed: "They knew the Niger story was a flat-out lie," he told the New Republic, anonymously. "They [the White House] were unpersuasive about aluminum tube
1118889
Absolutely not.  SIX years ago!!!! I don't think he remembers this, and if he does, it doesn't matter.  He will do his job.