why is effective communication necessary in business?
965641
Communication is a two way avenue. Maintaining an efficient and\n open communication link provide both party needed informations\nbeneficial to their requirements.Products are advertised to reach the consumers at large to attain necessary patronage and revenue. Communication is the most vital component of a sound business. Poor communication often times result to confusion and business bankruptcy. No business will ever prosper nor move forward without an effective means of communication. Just imagine how will your products propagate without communication. Therefore, creative and effective communication is a must for any business big or small.
241550
Communications is one of the greatest asset given to man. Without it, how can we socialize, or get anything done?
789016
Information is the backbone of all businesses.  If it is not organized in the optimum format, the business will not do well.  If the business objective is to attract new customers, their systems will have to process new customers quickly to seem more efficient than the competition.
258735
feedback means the info you get back as the result of a process in systems theory.  In business communication, when you perform an inquiry, the info you get back is your feedback.  It is the most important thing a business need to help it respond to changes, environment and costumers preferences.  It is always useful, but especially when you are about to plan for a new period, line o product.
411832
the key to a relation is communication!
806518
A good one has the charateristics of an effective communicator.  That includes ability to work with people (known as the system users) to understand their problem that a system solution can solve; to work with technical people (known as programmers) to put the system solution that really solves the system users; to follow system development life cycle process to ensure that the solution can be readily maintained and enhanced.\nIt is important because lack of it creates more or bigger problem than the original.
297973
Verbal communication.
1091709
Communication in business is watching your "p's & q's" a little more closely than usual.  Slang is frowned upon and communication is also culturally sensitive.  The direction/flow means that it is directed to the person resposible for acting upon it.  Problems/concerns always filter up through imediate supervisors. It is always frowned upon to jump up and over someone in the line of command.  There isn't much difference in writing/speaking except that writing is more direct and to the point because busy people don't want to read extra details they don't need to.  The language of business depends really on the business itself.  It's amazing but each business tends to have it's own language.  It depends on the industry and each group of people within a organization develope their own way of communicating with each other.
773459
corporate industry is a part of globalisation that is the corporate industry flourished in all parts of world so it need to communicate to others we need good communication skills then only others can understand about the project or ideas
542091
this statement is really justified. in present world communication is considered as the key factor of the success for any concern. ineffective communication or no communication  \nstops the smooth running. if we wont share ideas, information than things gonna stand where they are.\n\nthats why funda of team spirit is on high as in team proper channel of communication can be made effective.
1042567
you need communication, without it you have nothing.
389454
Explanation of Theory: \n\nCommunication competence is the ability to choose a communication behavior that is both appropriate and effective for a given situation. Interpersonal competency allows one to achieve their communication goals without causing the other party to lose face. The model most often used to describe competence is the component model (Spitzberg & Cupach, 1984) which includes three components: 1) knowledge, 2) skill, and 3) motivation. Knowledge simply means knowing what behavior is best suited for a given situation. Skill is having the ability to apply that behavior in the given context. Motivation is having the desire to communicate in a competent manner. \n\nTheorist: Spitzberg & Cupach \n\nDate:  1984 \n\nPrimary Article: \n\n     Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (1984). Interpersonal communication competence. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. \n\nIndividual Interpretations: \n\nThe component model's three parts requires that a communicator be able to 1) recognize what communication practice is appropriate (knowledge), 2) have the ability to perform that practice (skill), and 3) want to communicate in an effective and appropriate manner (motivation). \n\nCritique: \n\nThe component model of competence is not a theory about communication, but rather a model that sets the framework for what makes someone a competent communicator. The component model has been used as the basis for many other models of competence because of its breadth. The model can be easily applied to the criteria of effectiveness and appropriateness that make up a competent communicator. \n\nIdeas and Implications: \n\nSpecifically there is a new focus on this idea of competence that is concerned with how the dyad creates competency rather than the focus on the individual competency. In this model a dyad's communication can be competent in that within the relationship it is both effective and appropriate, but to those outside of the group, it might seem incompetent. \n\nExample: \n\nIn order to be a competent communicator, one must be able to recognize which skills are necessary in a particular situation, have those skills, and be properly motivated to use those skills. \n\nRelavant Research: \n\n     Beach, W. A., & Metzger, T. R. (1997). Claiming insufficient knowledge. Human Communication Research, 23,  562-89. \n\n     Cooper, L. O. (1997). Listening competency in the workplace: A model for training. Business Communication Quarterly, 60,  75-85. \n\n     Duran, R. L., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1995). Toward the development and validation of a measure of cognitive communication competence. Communication Quarterly, 43,  259-86. \n  \n  \n\nLocation in Eight (8) Primary Communication Theory Textbooks: \n\n     Anderson, R., & Ross, V. (1998). Questions of communication: A practical introduction to theory (2nd ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press.  N/A \n\n     Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D.C. (1998). Understanding communication theory: The communicative forces for human action. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. N/A \n\n     Griffin, E. (2000). A first look at communication theory (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. N/A \n\n     Griffin, E. (1997). A first look at communication theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. N/A \n\n      Infante, D. A., Rancer, A. S., & Womack, D. F. (1997). Building communication theory (3rd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press. N/A \n\n      Littlejohn, S. W. (1999). Theories of human communication (6th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. N/A \n\n      West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2000). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield. N/A \n\n       Wood, J. T. (1997). Communication theories in action: An introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. N/A \n---------------------\n\nThree Ways to Think About the Motivational Potential of Perceived Competence \n1. Competence as Effectance Motivation\n2. Competence as a Psychological Needs\n3. Competence as Optimal Experience\n \n  \nNote. Unless
249648
There's a few ways:\n\nCost reduction.  Transaction processing is much faster, less paper is used (ideally), etc.\n\nLocking in customers/suppliers.  The new modes of communication can be used to strengthen relations between a company and other parties.\n\nProduct/service differentiation.  IT can be used to help differentiate products from those of other companies, or even help develop new products.\n\nThese are just a few vague ones that I hope help get you started :)
187078
If you are speaking of an established business process, it will make things a lot easier to have one when implementing new tech. If you have processes that are constantly changing, your needs will change a lot, and this will call for changes in technology. You can sometimes get technology to work for more than one purpose, but it will not be nearly as efficient if the process changes frequently.
405420
Yes.  But that's because IM is a recommended way of communicating between our offices.
696379
I think communication is really important.  Obviously you don't want to scare anyone off, but its nice to be able to talk and see where both people are at in a relationship.  Depending on the people I think its good to find out what each of you want, without planning anything or making any real committments
208159
Often due to major restructurings, downsizing, re-engineering, mergers, joint ventures or other forms of alliances, many organisations find that their people  \nare not working well together.   Companies lose clients, lose key talent or fail to remain competitive and sustain a competitive advantage, because of poor cross- \nfunctional communications, internal conflicts, misunderstandings and stress, or because of poor working relations across various boundaries, especially in our 'globalised' world. \n\n\nWe work with organisations seeking to improve profitability by leveraging the potential in their human capital - we help them build bridges across cultures, whether departmental, corporate or international.  We work with managers to create effective cooperation and synergy within their organisations. \n\n\nHOW TO BRIDGE GAPS TO BUILD COOPERATION ACROSS BORDERS