Was there any famous scientist or biologist believe in a God?
958042
Many, why shouldn't there be? How is science or biology in any way incompatible with god?\n\nEinstein\nGregor Mendel\n\nNow you answer my question, how is science and/or biology incompatible with a belief in God?
438082
God does...I believe in the creation of all, but that doesn't mean that some species haven't evolved...There is probably room for both God and science, in the whole scenario..but not knowing enough about evolution, I couldn't say what part it has in the scheme of things..\nAltho God is my primary focus, I try to keep an open mind and learn things...
175150
For the person who mentioned it, science disproves your god and your bible. I would respect people who were religious if they would just say, "There is no proof or evidence; it is just my faith."\nOh, and to the person who wrote it, Einstein was an atheist.
687992
most people dont know what those are.\n\nbut youre right. there is no way to form a biochemical machine by natural selection\n\nmaybe you should have posted this in the science section but i guess your challenging people to seek God. Even if you prove that there is a Designer, they wont turn to religion they will just argue which religion is o the true religion forever. If people dont want to believe in God theyre not going to. if anyone thinks there is no God because of darwinian evolution, yea look into biochemical machines.
531161
Charles Darwin was a scientist. However, he declared himself as an agnostic. It doesn't matter whether he believed in God or not, though. What matters is that he contributed his ideas to the human race, and tried to open their eyes that evolution was how we came to being.\n\n\n*Sharptooth, evolution has been proven a lot of times already. It's just that people don't read. They waste their lives going to mass every Sunday and praying up to 4 hours a day waiting for their lives to rot off. And also, Creationism is only "just" a theory too. Nobody has ever proven it.\n\nI recommend you read these websites:\nhttp://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0411/feature1/\nhttp://pages.britishlibrary.net/charles.darwin\nhttp://www.aboutdarwin.com\nhttp://www.ncseweb.org
12562
Scientist thinks that God is not Real, that he is only an Invention of the Humans to make people Believe and to control all this Society ... So, you are never going to see him!
165379
Science is the study of creation of GOD. Actually in earlier times, many of the scientist were also religious scholars or believers. There were great scientist who were also religious scholars. For example Gregor Mendel, who is considered as father of genetics, was a Christian priest. Ibn Sina who made significiant contribution to anotamy was a Muslim scholar. For them religion was the motivation to learn about GOD's creation. Study of science will help in greater admiration of GOD's creation.
101350
God does.  And he believes in prevention rather than punishment (in the case of science at least)\n\nAnswer:\nGod created the natural world. Science is the study of it.
29764
None really - science is a methodology.  The scientists might have faith in all sorts of things -but science itself does not.
1084080
The reality is that most PEOPLE of average or better intelligence (let alone scientists!) seriously question the existence of god, but understand that it is easier just to go along with this popular myth. If god did in fact create everything, he did kind of a crappy job (what's an appendix for? why did he make malaria? why do babies get cancer? why do priests molest children? why did so many Jews perish in WWII? Was Hitler more powerful than god?), so that's why people don't believe.  Even if there is a god, clearly he is neither omnipotent nor truly benevolent.  Do you have a family member with cancer? Do they deserve it?
26528
Wow... The best answer I've ever heard was given to me by the 19 year old daughter of my dear friend during her college interview (with me).  When asked how she reconciled her devout faith with the study of astro-physics (her declared major), she responded "I see physics as the study of God's creation".  I think that scientists are examing and exposing God's greatest and infinite wisdom.
907031
An odd question, but you may have a point; an example would be some of the 'scientists' who have associated themselves with young-earth creationism. One guy has a degree in paleontology and studied under Steven Jay Gould - he knows that creationism is a load of bunk, but ignores all the evidence for an ancient earth, because he wants to believe the bible. I can not comprehend this kind of double-think, and find it quite scary, but the logic seems to be, "There is so much evidence against what I wish to believe, so I must have lots of faith to continue believing - this makes me a good servant of god!"
434320
God and religions requires belief which comes from a leap of faith.  With so many variations of beliefs, faith in God is totally subjective. \n\nScience is a method of proof, utilizing verifiable facts, evidence and substantiation.  We have yet to prove or disprove an existence of any Gods.
306542
Gods and goddesses belong to an infinite class of ideas that are incapable of being proven or disproven.  It's just like primitive people believing that evil demons cause disease - We can show exactly how micro-organisms cause disease, we can produce treatments based on that knowledge which actually work, we can show that people who claim to treat disease in supernatural ways are actually frauds, but we can never *disprove* the idea that demons are involved.  All we can say is that there is no rational reason to believe it.  The same is true of gods - We can't prove they are just imaginary, but there's no rational reason to believe in them.
818419
There is no such thing as a universal law. Even laws of physics we take for granted here on Earth do not necessarily hold true in other reference frames.\n\nThinking we can explain everything through science is supreme arrogance of the type that borders on religion. I don't believe in God, but I recognize that science is not a replacement for faith. It can't solve all our problems, and wouldn't be any fun if it could. We will never know it all, and that's the way it should be. To claim that there is one universal scientific truth that lays all the mysteries of existence bare is no different than simply attributing all unknowns to a deity.
1164641
By God of course.  Every other belief is just a theory withouth any proof.  The proof that we were created by God is not only the Bible but everything around us.  It makes no sense to believe in evolution, because why has evolution taken a break for a very long time? Huh!  Charles Darwin was a scumbag, I bet he got hit with that evolutionary rock multiple times.
737773
Of course, they co-exist.  Who do you think invented science?  God, of course.\n(Brace yourself for a lot of flak from those who say I'm an ignoramus, but I suspect most of that will come from people who haven't studied all that much science).