There is a Clearly a direct relationship between CO and VO , but that relationship is not linear why or why no
957157
Hi. Don't see a relationship between carbon monoxide (CO) and whiskey (VO).
934267
u do, ionic bonds results not from a sharing of electrons but from a transefer of one of more electrons from one atom to another
615100
the same elements except that \n-the ammount of CO2 inceases to 4%(not certain about the value)\n-the oxygen ammount decreeases to 16%\n-the water vapour ammount also increases
237201
it's not actually chemical reactions (well it could be related to how our bodies process another's pheromones), but it is more of the emotional connection, the physical attraction, etc.
363082
2Ag+ + CO_33-2 -> Ag_2CO_3
983019
Carbon monoxide has a triple bond between the two elements, and has a LINEAR electron geometry.  Although, there IS a fairly large electronegativity difference between the carbon and oxygen, lone-pair distribution makes up for it.  Therefore, a carbon monoxide molecule is still a little polar.  It does have a small dipole moment.
820189
Because the volume, pressure, and temperature are all related by Boyles Law and the Ideal Gas Law.\n\npv=nRt\n\nPressure times Volume equals the Number of molecules times the Gas Constant time the temperature.
424018
A gaseous substance consists of a tremendous number of minute particles that PASS THROUGH LARGE SPACES without colliding, then collide like billiard balls and fly apart in different directions with different velocities, until the next collision.\n\nIf we were to trace the path of a single gas molecule ( naturally, this can be done only mentally), we would it find it moving now to left or to the right, now forward or backward. Some times it would be moving with a LARGE velocity and at other times it would be moving SLOWLY. \n\nIn view of the chaotic nature of thermal motion in gas, there will undoubtedly be equal quantities of molecules in ALL directions.\n\nIt must be realised, however, that these statements are of a statistical character.\n\nThey are valid on the average, whereby the greater the number of molecules involved the greater the validity.\n\nIf the number of molecules is large, the deviations of the instantaneous values from the average, i.e., the fluctuations are negligible.\n\nSince there are 2.7 x 10^19 molecules in a cm cube of gas, the fluctuations per cm cube amounts to 2 x 10 ^ (-10) using the formula f = 1/ square root of no of molecules; the value shows that it is beyond experimental observations.\n\nThis is the reason for expecting all molecules in a gas to have the same average speed.\n\nIn a rarified gas, however, we could not expect the same.
570980
If an element combines with another element to form more than one compound, the various weights of one compound which combine with the fixed weight of the other element bear a simple ratio to one another eg\nCarbon Monoxide C 12  + O 16\ncarbon Dioxide  C 12  + O 32\nRatio of 1 to 2
897570
Dimensional analysis is easier than it first seems.\n\nFirst you need to know the molecular weight of CO2.\n\nCarbon +2(Oxygen) = 12 + 2(16) = 44 grams per mole\n\n[The above step is not dimensional analysis.]\n\nLet's say somebody asks you how many moles 440 grams of CO2 is.\n\nThis is where we do dimensional analysis.\n\n(1 mole CO2 / 44 grams CO2) * (440 grams CO2 / ? CO2)\n\nThe / sign indicates "divided by", so imagine the parts over each other.  That makes it easier but I cannot do it here in text.\n\nThe first part of the above equation is stating that for every mole of CO2, there are 44 grams of CO2.  The second part says that we have 440 grams of CO2, and want to find out how many moles we have.\n\nThe trick here is to have the terms, one above the other, so that the units cancel out and you end up with the desired unit.  Our desired unit here is the mole - we want to know how many moles are in 440 grams of CO2.  So, that is why in the above, (1 mole CO2) is on top of (44 grams CO2).  If we allow 440 grams to be on top in the next term, then grams cancels out, and moles is the only unit left.  This is what we want.\n\nSo if we solve the above\n\n(1/44)*(440/1) = 440/44 = 10 moles of CO2.\n\nSo, 440 grams of CO2 is the same as 10 moles of CO2.\n\nhope this helps\n\nyay
939642
Counterexample.  Let u(x), v(x) be members of {sin x, cos x}.  Both of those are solutions, but you do not get zero by adding one to the other, or by doubling one of them.
773555
Murali,\n\nCan you please update your question with proper wordings? \n\nIt is very confusing to answer!\n\nAre you talking about a relationship between Connecticut and Florida \n\nor \n\nAre you talking about the relationship between Carbon Monoxide and Fluorine?\n\nBoth the above are easy to answer.\n\na. Go to Yahoo Search and then look for the search results as to ' relationship beteeen Connecticut and Florida'\n\nb. Look for search results of Carbon monoxide and fluorine in yahoo and get clarified with what you want!\n\nGood Luck Murali!
853597
both have a solid, liquid, and gas phase.  it's just that to get CO2 in the liquid phase takes a lot of effort and is highly reactive in terms of it quickly evaporates to the preferred state of gaseous CO2.  just think of what each is at RT and that will help when you look at the phase diagrams
111164
That is an assumption which cannot be proven. No one yet disproved it by showing 2 of the same.\n\nIf you consider the molecular scale, there's pretty much never 2 of the same of anything.  So I (as most people seem to) am referring to 2 of the exact same pattern.  There are infinitely many of possibilities, but there have been an awful lot of snowflakes to assume none have been the same.
818907
Linear means that the relationship between two variables varies in the same way, except by a constant factor (A) and a constant offset (B).  y = A*x + B\n\nThe volume of water in a tank, and its mass are linearly related.  [m = p*V, where m is the mass, p (rho) is the density of water, which is constant (converted to the units of m and V), and V is the volume of water.  The units of m and V are usually kg and liters, or lbs and ft^3.]\n\nAny other kind of relationship is non-linear, which includes most every process in the real world.  Non-linear relationships usually seem to result from friction/entropy/inefficiency or from forces like magnetic fields, electric fields, or gravity, or well pretty much everything real.
599765
When graphed, a linear equation will form a straight line while a non linear equation will not be a straight line
837061
it can be the original way you had it (c=mx +y) but it is alot simpler in the long run to rearrange it to (y=mx+c) (y being y, x being x, m being gradient, c being a constant). this way it is easyer to solve.