Who should be impeached, bush or clinton??
951936
Bush for lying and getting us into an unjust war.
1014603
Yes. I guess so but it would never work because Bush would have to be charged with a felony or general incompetence. I would be struck down not only by Republicans but also by the Democrats. Only two presidents have ever been impeached: Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton
683740
This is what we need to do....    Make sure you get out in Vote for a better Change this November~! Go Democrats~!\nArticles of Impeachment\n\nof\n\nPresident George W. Bush\n\nand\n\nVice President Richard B. Cheney,\nSecretary of State Condoleezza Rice,\nSecretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and\nAttorney General Alberto Gonzales\n\nThe President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. - - ARTICLE II, SECTION 4 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA\n\nPresident George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales have committed violations and subversions of the Constitution of the United States of America in an attempt to carry out with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes and deprivations of the civil rights of the people of the United States and other nations, by assuming powers of an imperial executive unaccountable to law and usurping powers of the Congress, the Judiciary and those reserved to the people of the United States, by the following acts:\n\n1) Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the  rule of law; carrying out a massive assault on and occupation of Iraq, a country that was not threatening the United States, resulting in the death and maiming of over one hundred thousand Iraqis, and thousands of U.S. G.I.s.\n\n2) Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.\n\n3) Authorizing, ordering and condoning direct attacks on civilians, civilian facilities and locations where civilian casualties were unavoidable. \n\n4) Instituting a secret and illegal wiretapping and spying operation against the people of the United States through the National Security Agency.\n\n5) Threatening the independence and sovereignty of Iraq by belligerently changing its government by force and assaulting Iraq in a war of aggression.\n\n6) Authorizing, ordering and condoning assassinations, summary executions, kidnappings, secret and other illegal detentions of individuals, torture and physical and psychological coercion of prisoners to obtain false statements concerning acts and intentions of governments and individuals and violating within the United States, and by authorizing U.S. forces and agents elsewhere, the rights of individuals under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.\n\n7) Making, ordering and condoning false statements and propaganda about the conduct of foreign governments and individuals and acts by U.S. government personnel; manipulating the media and foreign governments with false information; concealing information vital to public discussion and informed judgment concerning acts, intentions and possession, or efforts to obtain weapons of mass destruction in order to falsely create a climate of fear and destroy opposition to U.S. wars of aggression and first strike attacks.\n\n8) Violations and subversions of the Charter of the United Nations and international law, both a part of the "Supreme Law of the land" under Article VI, paragraph 2, of the Constitution, in an attempt to commit with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes in wars and threats of aggression against Afghanistan, Iraq and others and usurping powers of the United Nations and the peoples of its nations by bribery, coercion and other corrupt acts and by rejecting treaties, committing treaty violations, and frustrating compliance with treaties in order to destroy any means by which international law and institutions can prevent, affect, or adjudicate th
860084
Clinton was impeached for telling lies while under oath.\nBush has committed no "war crimes"\nJust another obvious Liberal Socialist lie.
507493
I really think that George Bush should go through an investigation. Impeachment could be the outcome of the investigation, yes.
215415
Worst in my lifetime, and I was born during Truman's first term.  No president has divided this nation as much and caused more harm to us internationally than George W. Bush and his band of cronies.  He should be impeached for all of the needless deaths he has caused.
491393
I say Pres. Bush needs to be impeached and sent to the country he seems to be loyal to. How did you like the s.s. identity theft being forgiven. Identity theft is a felony.
27780
He's a horrible president.  He should be impeached for the following reasons:\n\nThe case for the impeachment of George W. Bush is made by a clear deductive argument: Any president who breaks the law and desecrates the Constituiton should be impeached. President Bush breaks the law and desecrates the Constitution. Therefore, President Bush should be impeached.\n\nConsider the evidence: The Eighth Amendment prohibits "cruel and unusual punishment," but Bush approves of extraordinary rendition, which allows suspects to be sent off to foreign regimes that condone cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment. He thus circumvents the Geneva Conventions forbdding torture.\n\nThe Fifth Amendment guarantees "due process of law," but the secret prisons operated overseas by the CIA totally ignore the "presumption of innocence," and thus run roughshod over this right.\n\nThe Fourth Amendment prohibits "unreasonable search and seizure" unless there is "probable cause," but Bush authorizes electronic eavesdropping on all American citizens without the court-approved warrants required for domestic spying. He also violates the "separation of powers" principle when he commands the executive branch of the government to operate secretly, and evade the checks and balances of the judicial branch.\n\nThe Fourth Amendment guarantees "the right of the people to be secure in their papers and effects," but Bush's reauthorization of the Patriot Act --- which allows the government access to medical and library records --- makes a shambles of this right to privacy. Since an Orvellian Big Brother might be spying on you, you had better not borrow Marx's "Communist Manifesto" from the local library.\n\nThe Sixth Amendment guarantees the right of the accused to "a speedy trial" and the right "to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation," but the prisoners at Guantanamo Bay are held for indefinite periods without legal representation, and without even hearing the charges against them.\n\nThe First Amendment ensures freedom of the press, but Bush mocks that freedom when he denounces the media as "shameful" for reporting his illigal domestic surveillance, and when he threatens an investigation of The New York Times.\n\nIf it is self-evident that any president who desecrates the Constitution should be impeached, and if it is proved by factual evidence that President Bush desecrates the Constitution, then it is inevitably true that he should be impeached.
621311
See, that's what I'm saying.  Clinton was nearly impeached for getting head, and Bush has done so so so much worse.  I wish he could get impeached.  We should find out how to get it started!
679425
I don't know why he hasn't been impeached yet, except for the total lameness of the Democrats. Imagine what the Republicans would have done to Clinton if he had done the things Bush has:\n1. Totally wrong about WMDs (I'm being charitable here, I actually think he lied through his teeth).\n2. Sanctioned torture.\n3. Sanctioned kidnapping of foreign citizens.\n4. Established secret prisons outside the US so he could torture the kidnapped foreign nationals.\n5. Established public prisons like Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo to hold people without trial, apparently forever.\n6. Used the NSA to spy on American citizens, contrary to law and the Constitution he swore to uphold.\n7. Lie about EVERY SINGLE ONE of the points above.\n\nHis claim: "I talk to God." I am sure he's talking to SOMEONE, but I don't think God told him to do all that.
109953
yes, he should be impeached.  The reason why he hasn't been is due to the fact that he is a powerful businessman(corporate owner) and also that Republicans do a better job supporting each other and sticking together.  But why would Bush waste and year a half's time preaching to the public about taking Saddam down when 75% of 9/11 terrorists were Saudis and Bin Laden is a Saudi?  After the 9/11 attacks happened, 26 members of the Bin-Laden family were allowed to get on a flight out of the country.  It's just like this:  Bush and his father are very close business partners with the Saudie.  They have given the Bush family billions of dollars towards their business efforts(oil).   Taking acttion against an allied nation, regardless of the reason would have ruined our reputation in the world, and since 7% of economy is owned by Saudis, it would have been a devastating blow to the economy.  So Iraq was the next best thing.
905415
Sadly, I do not think Bushie will ever face the music he so richly deserves. And to think a few years back they wanted to impeach Clinton for lying about a sexual encounter. Whereas Dumya lied , has gotten us in a war that it seems no end to without hardly any dissent from the media, or the populace.
97474
Bush, most definately!!!!!!! This answer has nothing to do with the fact the I like Bush or that I am a diehard republican but the fact that......Clinton is a pig!!!!!!!
627050
America will have no more of the Bush's. Their reign is over. America wants to impeach the one we have now as it is. George Bush and his family have lost all if any credibility. Too many lies...
277909
I believe Bush should be impeached immediately. You want to know why I think that? Watch this film on 9-11:\n\nhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848\n\n\nAnd then write your congressman and tell him you want Bush impeached! Everyone must do this or it will never happen and he will get away with god-only-knows how many other crimes.\n\n\nPeace
1062127
Impeach Bush & Cheney
731629
I think it has been established that George Bush, his regime leaders and his lackeys have lied to the American people and to the rest of the world.  I have heard people compare George Bush with Bill Clinton.  "Clinton lied, he was impeached.  Bush lied, therefore, he should be impeached too".   There is a big difference.  Bill Clinton lied to Congress about his personal affair with Monica.  Congress has made it illegal to lie to Congress.  Therefore, Bill Clinton broke the law.  He was impeached but not convicted.  George Bush lied to the American people.  As a result of George Bush's lie around 3000 American soldiers and counting have been killed.  Perhaps hundreds of thousands of Iraqi men, women and children have been killed.  As a result of George Bush's lie somewhere between 2 and 7 billion dollars a week have been wasted on that war.  That money could have been used as rescue aid for Katrina victims.  Though it never would have since this government would never come to the aid of poor black people.  As a result of George Bush's lie the "terrorists" now have another legitimate cause to rally behind. \n\nCongress has not made it illegal to lie to the American people.  Congress would not make it illegal to lie to the American people because virtually every member of Congress is guilty of lying to the American people. Lying is the mechanism that they use to get elected.  George Bush has broken no laws.  Therefore George Bush cannot be impeached. \n\nWell, these are the facts, as preposterous as they are.