I'm writing a research paper for science, and I dont get what a Discussion is and the difference between refe.
964645
In your Discussion, you incorporate the results, theory behind what you did, etc. This is the substance of your paper. Your references are what sources you used. And acknowledgements is used to thank certain people for helping you with your paper, like your teacher, library, a close friend. etc.
183128
You said research paper, so basically an essay.  Yea, the introduction, body/bulk, conclusion is the general outline but u left something out.  After the introduction, there's the main argument (your point of view), your reasons to support it (the proof), then there's the counter-argument (anything you can think of to argue against your topic), the counter-argument's reasons/proofs, and finally your conclusion (which supports your main argument and defies the counter-argument).
669462
No one seems to know; people argue interchangeably over the two.\n\nThe ref below describes this in more detail.
985100
I think it's a good idea for students to see both (I'll call them "theories")  Use a comparison: Are students exposed to the writing style of Shakespeare only? Or, are they exposed to many writers?  If Ford was the only car offered for sale, how would a person know the points of other cars? The saying goes that "competition is healthy." Why not show more than one theory and let the student decide?
150025
This is a tough question to answer. Are you writing a paper for high school or college?  Are you asking so that you can maximize your grade or simply because you're dissatisfied with an assignment and wished you could understand its usefulness?\n\nIf you're writing a paper for college, I would suggest that a research paper is supposed to help you synthesize what you've learned, while simultaneously giving you the chance to argue for against some point.  It's most likely intended, in other words, to be argumentative in nature.\n\nIt's always important to ask your professor (or teacher) this question.  You need to understand what they're hoping for so that you can fulfill the assignment.\n\nFrom a general perspective, research papers are another chance to practice the craft of writing and to prepare for a productive career.\n\nGood luck!
1011349
You know, it might be kinda fun asking questions through this format, but you will learn it better by actually doing the studying yourself. \n\nRemember that "conservation of matter" has to do with keeping stuff the same. The rock cycle is very broad and covers all the rock processes, both contact and regional metamorphism have changes in crystal types occurring, so sedimentation has to be the best illustration of conservation of matter. \n\nBut go back to your notes and your text and then rewrite the information in your own words to make it stick in your head.
923030
I would just talk about way plant and animal cells are constructed like cell walls and stuff. And talk about differences in how they make energy like animals burn sugar and plants first make sugar themselves. I'm sure that could be used to discuss nutrients issues.
780972
Well you can talk about different things, make a point-veiw for each one of the group regarding anything like political issue , religious,...etc.\nOne new thing is ask one eachother about something you did not know about it, make it scientific.
873123
The purpose of research is to discover how other scholars have approached a question or problem.\n\nWriting a research paper is engaging in conversation with those other scholars by proposing a potential contribution to the dialogue surrounding that question or problem.
725300
"Science is anything that can be written down recorded and set a data."\n\nHere's a tip for you: Whenever you need to redefine a word to prove a point, you are WRONG. Redefining the word does NOT make you correct, it shows everyone with half a brain how wrong you are, and that you know yourself that you're wrong, right off the bat.
489547
What is the aim of your paper?  \nA biological discussion of what chemotherapy does to the host cells?  \nThe social aspect of a undergoing chemotherapy?\n\nWe need some idea of where you are headed or what you hope to answer in order to develop a thesis - and there could be several thousand from what you've already said.
760495
depends on what kind\ndo you want to discuss books movies or something?\n\ni know some websites explain and i'll edit in some
205662
Aaaaaah, let us see. Both are a way of conveying thoughts. Both are a form introspection. Both are a round about way of saying a very simple thing\n:)
881466
the diff between a persuasive paper and an argumentive paper is about what the motivation to talk about it is. if you're compairing it to someone else's oppinion, then it's arg. if you're just trying to get people to do or think about something, then it's pers.
457822
introduction- sound engaging. convince your reader that your topic is an issue thats worth considering. clearly and strongly state your opinion. and try not to use a passive voice when doing this.\n\nbody paragraphs- give reasons to support your opinion. try to appeal to your audience. you can appeal to common sense, logic, emotion, ethics, etc. giving evidence is also a good idea. statistics work great. and if you can show that you did soe good research, im sure your teacher will love it.\n\nconclusion- if you like, give a quick summary of your reasons. state you opinion statement. and... a "call to action" where you are calling to the reader to take action and act on your opinion. when doing this, assume your reader strongly believes and agrees with your opinion and view on the issue.
750823
Enough information should be presented in it to enable someone else to recreate the experiment.\n\nFor example, reaction, reaction mechanism, reagents, solvents, conditions, etc\n\nDon't assume that just because you'r reporting this to your instructor that you don't need to put the basic theoretical information such as the reaction.  The instructor is simply tryng to determine your level of knowledge, and to begin helping you understand the process of scientific writing.\n\nFor the best resource on this, check out the first link below by the American Chemical Society.  It will help you.
869088
I was taught to write the best argument then least important after and then at the end summarize again your main argument. You want the reader to think that your points are interesting, the arguments that are not so important I would just stick to the basic points I would not go into useless detail about them (main points).\nbut it can also depend on who is marking your work and what that teacher likes, ask them if you can.