Why India is adopting Bangladesh terrorists ?
952451
Indian politicians are selling their morale for some votes.\nJust for satisfying muslims who are never patriot to india.\nIndia is suffering from internal terrorism caused by bangladeshi hngry muslims.\nBangladesh should know that india was the god for them when india gave them independence from pakistan.\nBangladesh will definitely die in hunger if indian politician stops that infiltration.
132296
The Indian parliament was attacked by terrorists with 15 people killed. Whether you are referring to politics in another country such as the US is another matter.
350694
AUSSIES ARE DANCING TO ICC'S TUNES.\nICC HAD BEEN CRITICISED HEVIELY FOR AWARDING TEST STATUS TO BANGLADESH.\nNOW AUSSIES COME TO HELP ICC.\nICC CAN SHUT THE BLAMING MOUTHS NOW.\nICC WILL SHOW ITS GRATEFULNESS SOME HOW TO AUSSIES.\nWHO KNOWS..THEY MAY BE THE 2007 WC CHAMPIONS.\n\n\nI DONT BELIEVE BANGLADESH CAN RESIST AUSSIES  THIS MUCH.
490628
Bangladesh did not get Independence from the British! On 15th August,1947 when India got Independence, Bangladesh was a part of Pakistan.But in 1971 with the intervention of India, Bangladesh attained independence from Pakistan.This was the main reason for the 1971 Indo-Pak war.
570565
What does the government have against Indians? I think you're being paranoid unless there's solid proof.
660904
It goes way back to the invasion of Afghanistan by the Soviets. When Afghanistan was invaded hard-line Fundamentalist moved to Pakistan. They effectively took over the civil government and the military. They are not as extreme as the Taliban who took over Afghanistan when the Soviets withdrew, but they were sufficiently radicalized that they brought a certain amount of fear to the population. Those who could, did get out. They moved to the UK, Canada, and the US. Pakistan, while not exactly up there with India in opportunity, is not as poor as imagined, the migration was primarily to leave Pakistan for a safer place to live. As you know, Pakistan is now a nuclear nation, so there is some validity to the concern.
304502
football is really popular in all parts of Bangladesh. especially in rural areas and villages. but unfortunately India and Bangladesh are not in the standards of  international football. so its cricket for us
93920
Bangladesh used to be a province of Pakistan and there was a separatist movement in it which got flared due to some political tensions.\n\nIt got independence from Pakistan in 1971 and had some strained relations for few years but this was all solved in 1974 and since then both are good friendly countries with several trade and other exchanges taking place
1161077
The area which is now Bangladesh has a rich historical and cultural past, the product of the repeated influx of varied peoples, bringing with them the Dravidian, Indo-Aryan, Mongol-Mughul, Arab, Persian, Turkic, and European cultures. About 1200 A.D., Muslim invaders under Sufi influence, supplanted Hindu and Buddhist dynasties, and converted most of the population of the eastern areas of Bengal to Islam. Since then, Islam has played a crucial role in the region's history and politics. In the 16th century, Bengal was absorbed into the Mughul Empire. \n\nPortuguese traders and missionaries reached Bengal in the latter part of the 15th century. They were followed by representatives of the Dutch, the French, and the British East India Companies. During the 18th and 19th centuries, especially after the defeat of the French in 1757, the British gradually extended their commercial contacts and administrative control beyond Calcutta into the remainder of Bengal and northwesterly up the Ganges River valley. In 1859, the British Crown replaced the East India Company, extending British dominion from Bengal in the east to the Indus River in the west. \n\nIn the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Muslim and Hindu leaders began to press for a greater degree of independence. At the movement's forefront was the largely Hindu Indian National Congress. Growing concern about Hindu domination of the movement led Muslim leaders to form the All-India Muslim League in 1906. In 1913, the League formally adopted the same goal as the Indian National Congress: self-government for India within the British Empire. The Congress and the League were unable, however, to agree on a formula to ensure the protection of Muslim religious, economic, and political rights. Over the next 2 decades, mounting tension between Hindus and Muslims led to a series of bitter intercommunal conflicts. \n\nThe idea of a separate Muslim state emerged in the 1930s. It gained popularity among Indian Muslims after 1936, when the Muslim League suffered a decisive electoral defeat in the first elections under the 1935 constitution. On March 23, 1940, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, leader of the Muslim League, publicly endorsed the "Pakistan Resolution" that called for the creation of an independent state in regions where Muslims were a majority. \n\nAt the end of World War II, the United Kingdom, under considerable international pressure to reduce the size of its overseas empire, moved with increasing urgency to grant India independence. The Congress Party and the Muslim League could not, however, agree on the terms for drafting a constitution or establishing an interim government. In June 1947, the UK declared it would grant full dominion status to two successor states--India and Pakistan. Pakistan would consist of the contiguous Muslim-majority districts of western British India, plus parts of Bengal. The various princely states could freely join either India or Pakistan. These arrangements resulted in a bifurcated Muslim nation separated by more than 1,600 kilometers (1,000 mi.) of Indian territory. West Pakistan comprised four provinces and the capital, Lahore. East Pakistan was formed of a single province. Each province had a legislature. The capital of federal Pakistan was at Islamabad. \n\nPakistan's history for the next 26 years was marked by political instability and economic difficulties. Dominion status was rejected in 1956 in favor of an "Islamic Republic within the Commonwealth." Attempts at civilian political rule failed, and the government imposed martial law between 1958 and 1962 and 1969 and 1972. The government was dominated by Military and Oligarchies all rooted in the West. Significant amount of national revenues went towards developing the West at the expense of the East. The people of the Eastern wing began to feel increasingly dominated and exploited by the West. Frictions between West and East Pakistan culminated in a 1971 army crackdown
1134866
It depends on their mentallity.Those muslims, who loves his nation more than his religion,will support India in these cases.Otherwise they will not support India.
594971
When India was pro-USSR, it got USA edgy and they started befriending Pakistan and selling them arms. Now these very weapons are in the hands of terrorits now and being used against US.\n\nUSSR is no longer in the scene as a Super Power and Uncle Sam realises the potential India has as a fast developing economic super power.\n\nNeed I say more?
1096273
Because all they need is a tiny bit of incentive to go off on a killing spree.  And it works doesn't it?  Look how so many came out condemning the cartoons in order to pacify the radicals.  Every time they go off the deep end, the rest of the world is standing there in horror and fear then finally succumbing to siding with the extremists just so the violence stops.  It's a very effective way of silencing the masses and getting what they want.  Which is the first step in forceful conversion to Islam.
716208
We have had terrorists living in our midst too. Would we appreciate France invading us for that reason? We have terrorists living within both our countries. Don't think so? Why not? The reasoning is the same. Pakistan is also trying to rid itself of terrorists. They pose a risk to their govt also.\n\nWere you aware this country sells nuclear technology to other questionable countries? The gov't makes it possible. Westinghouse, et al does the rest. It is no more right for us to do so than for them. What makes you think India has not done the same thing? And the French? Brits?Russia?China?\n\nThe fact remains that Pakistan is more useful to us than a problem, being one of the few Muslim countries willing to work with us. Sure they would like to be rid of our influence. The same with Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, need I go on? They need us & we need them\n\nOn the other hand, why don't we wage war on all Muslim countries? We can't possibly win. It would cure their problem with us. But it would keep the bloodthirstys among us happy while it lasted.
1175211
i know this may sound racist,but i heard from one of my friends.the Indian Military is extremely skilled in stealth. No matter how you try to use the gps satellite to spot them, u can never see them.If India becomes a Super Power, the neighbouring countries will be feeling uneasy.
687320
If you want to label Pakistan as a terrorist state, please also include the US for their support to the Mujaheddin during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan and their support for Israel in Palestine. Please also include India for their support to East Pakistan (Bangladesh) during the 1971 crises. An irony of history is that the winning side is always the one to decide who the terrorists are. In Pakistan's case, that question has not been decided as yet so lets not get hasty with our conclusions!\n\nIf you are comparing the leadership of Pakistan with Saddam Hussain's leadership, I am sorry, but either you are trying to exaggerate an issue out of proportion or you have no idea what you are talking about. Its because of thinking like this why peace can never be achieved. Why not engage your time constructively rather than by trying (and failing miserably) to create rifts?
453769
The biggest reason why flooding oocurs in Bangladesh is because its REALLY below sea level.  Also they don't have the money to bulid up nice dams or other safety measures needed unlike other countries or areas.
1067910
Why do you complain about Pakistans terror attachments. You must be aware that India initially sponsored LTTE whcih is now the worlds most efficient terrorist groups. Welcome to national self-interest