should there still the colleges and school only for the man/boy or women/girls?
961346
I don't see why not.  If people would prefer to go to a non-coed school they should be able to.
839049
Not necessarily - unless she is at some GREAT disadvantage by not being let in (i.e. a scholarship is only available at THAT school, say). \n\nThere is nothing inherently wrong with single-sex learning institutions. The public schools are figuring that out now, and experimenting with single-sex classrooms.
444627
I'm not sure exactly what you mean ... But I'll give you what I think you mean ...\n\nIt is popular among educators to talk about single-gender classrooms. There are some that believe that if boys and girls take separate classes, they can learn more. So, they study the same subjects, but just from different teachers or at different times. All the boys in one class, the girls in another.
905910
no, but mandatory universal military training, both male and female, would be great.
238027
Yes.  If a school is renting out their facilities they have to rent it to whoever wants to rent it as long as they meet the requirements listed.  They can not discrimate based upon race, sex, political affilliations, disability, or religion.  This is true of any person or organization that is renting out facilities.
642678
No. Quota systems are never a good plan, as they elevate certain groups above others. Things like school entrance and jobs should be based on MERIT, rather than your class, appearance, weight, etc.
891067
When boy/girl or man/women are in classes together there could be less attention to the books! As opposed to male/female classes there is more attention to details of study!\n\nSuggest putting words relating to your question at "google" and there you will get 1000,s of answers, to narrow down to exactly what you need just keep adding or rewording entry...\n\nGood Luck!
100008
To me it's all the same.  I agree that if 2 girls is accepted in society, than 2 men should be accepted in society.  But to me I could care less regardless.
605297
They aren't, at least not in the US.  In fact, it is the opposite.  US US universities are obligated to try and create a diverse student body.  This means racially, culturally as well as by gender.  \n\nThe idea behind this is that it benefits the students there to learn about the other cultures and peoples in the country, to prevent prejudices from ruining someone’s chances (if you don’t like a certain group you may not admit them, but you will anyway if you are required to) as well as to give chances to people to improve themselves (if you come from a very poor family, had minimal education support from your parents and had to work part-time in high school, your grades might be a bit lower than those of a wealthy candidate who didn’t have to work and whose parents invested a great deal of time and money into providing the best education and enrichment opportunities.  When comparing straight grades and test scores, you wouldn’t get a spot while the wealthier student would.  The idea behind giving you a spot despite your lower scores is first to account for your achievements despite your obstacles, and also to cut you a break, give you a chance so that your children won’t have to go through what you did and your entire family will rise in economic and social well-being). \n\nAnyway, in the US approximately 60% of applicants to colleges and universities are female, while only 40% are male.  Admissions staff must still try to create a student body as close to 50/50 that they can.  What this means is that it is harder for a female to get a place than a male.  Another way to put it is if you are a male with a 3.4 GPA and a 1280 test  score, you may be chosen over a female with a 3.6 GPA and a 1320 SAT score.   All females are competing for the same amount of spaces as all males, but there are much less males in their pool than females in theirs.
834648
i totally agree with you on that.... there will never be gender equality... although iwould like to think there will be.... there are things that keep taht from happening.... like gurls are allowed to play foot ball because of girls wanting to do it.... but guys cant be on gurls teams cuz men are naturally stronger than women... so its  not fair.  but i think that if guys areant allowed to be on gurls teams then they should make football and wrestling for gurls and gymnastics and what not for men... like how they are finally getting most schools to have most sports available for both sexes... i think it should have been along time ago but people are so stuck in teh past that women are very differant and are basically nothing that there is always gunna be some one that is like no... that shouldnt be because its not natural or whatever.... just like racists will always be around and so will sexists and all that... its something that we iwll just have to learn to deal with by making a diffreance and putting an effort at getting a mens gymnastics team or whatever in their school and getting gurls into football and making it ok for a guy to be on cheerleading if he wants to instead of being called gay or whtever cuz thats what he wants to do... its time for everyone to grow up mentally and realize that everyone deserves all the same rights.... and everyone should serve teh same sentance if they commit the same crime and what not.... so yeah.. .i totally agree with you!! and sorry so long... kinda blowing off steam too.. but oh well.. its true.. our nation should grow up and get over it....
819411
If there is no sport for the gender, then yes. For example, if there is no girls' football team and there is a boys' football team then either (a) let the girl join the boys' football team or (b) form a girls' football team.\n\nI feel the same vice versa. In the article you linked to, I disagree with the court's ruling. Since there was no boys' gym team, the school should have made provision for him to compete with the girls' team, formed a boys' team, or allowed him to join a neighboring boys' team.
1040633
Hi, well that depends on the religon and the state. In Brooklyn NY there are alot of private school for girls only. I used to go to one.
82871
I suppose the opposite would also be a bias question.  Would the world be better run by women?  I think that egual representation all around would be ideal.  Keep in mind, there are plenty of great male representatives and plenty of bad ones.  Again, the same can be said for females.  So, the question should be, is it important that free society be governed by fair rulers?
429309
I second the two-at-most answer as a rule of thumb - and one that's true at most colleges of any sort. That said, do check with Your Particular Community College: some schools have their own way of going about things.
680644
It si proven that boys get lost in Co-ed system because they learn at a much slower rate than girls - plus there is less distractions at single sex schools...believe me I should have pushed my parents more into sending me to an all boys school...Its is much much better.
314239
I forget where I read this, but a study in England suggested that boys do better in co-educational schools, while girls do better in single-sex schools.
114573
I have known both males and females who were excellent special education teachers and both males and females who were terrible special education teachers.  The important factors are training, experience, committment, caring.  Gender is a  non-issue.