Who believes that President Clinton's career crashed by being too far Left?
963646
Not me. He was too far to the right, that's why the right hated him so. He threatened to take back the south from the Republicans. Clinton's book explains his conservative views and the strategy of the Democratic Leadership Council. The Hunting of the President details the witchhunt and explains the why of it.\n\nThe Hunting of the President: The Ten-Year Campaign to Destroy Bill and Hillary Clinton by Joe Conason, Gene Lyons
343694
He has actually moved to the right some, but all in all is still quite moderate, Bush being far right does cause conflict with him and he does disagree with him on certain points. I have allot more respect for McCain then most repuglicans that get in lock step with the far right and never mind what the average American people need.
568134
Oh my god, I think I've finally found someone more conservative than me.  Is it possible?\n\nHey, I am firmly against Hillary in the Oval Office.  There are two types of personality.  In the first type, the person rises to the occasion.  He realizes the solemnity and critical nature of the office.  Where once the candidate was flippant or cavalier about the issues, he now realizes he has the weight of the world on his shoulders, and he elevates his attitude and behavior to match the importance of his office.  That is Bush.\n\nThe second type of personality is susceptible to corrupting influences, and becomes drunk on power, even if the person believes his or her actions are altruistic.\n\nI'm afraid Hillary falls under the second category.  I too have heard her say some rather unsettling things.  They were not taken out of context; it is what she really meant to say.\n\nThe funny thing about liberals is they have almost everything completely backwards.  Consider the war in Iraq.\n\nBush once made the remarkable statement about "the soft bigotry of low expectations". I want you to remember that quote. Think about what he is saying. I've talked to a lot of liberals about the Iraqi conflict, and when I bring up the obvious point that millions of people have now been given the opportunity to live in freedom rather than tyranny, they prattle on, objecting with erroneous, irrelevant arguments. If I chide them enough, and make them hot under the collar, they will finally lose control and exclaim, "Oh come on, you don't really expect that a bunch of stupid, volatile, irrational Arabs can handle democracy, do you?"\n\nBush does not denigrate the people of the Middle East with the "soft bigotry of low expectations". Unlike the Democrats, he believes in their potential. He does not arrogantly belive that they can't handle democracy.\n\nThis same concept applies to democrats, especially liberal democrats.  Their whole outlook on life is mired in the soft bigotry of low expectations.  They constantly talk about how loving and compassionate they are, so they're going to make the government "help" us.\n\nMy response is, "If that's how you love me....PLEASE... don't 'love' me again!!!"
523101
He is not there to be "funny" unfortunately. And what he is there to do, he has screwed up well beyond repair. The funniest thing about him though is his struggle to get simple words formed into a sentence. For my fellow Americans who think Clinton was the biggest joke, you must admit that besides getting a extra marital piece on the side (which they all do anyway) the country was far better off.
829770
yes Clinton said over and over that he couldn't get things done because of a republican congress\nrepugs seem to not want to work as a team they dig their feet in and refuse to help a dem president but will do ANYTHING a repug wants.....right or wrong
122881
At this point, I would vote for Donald Duck as an alternative to George Bush.  He's just as articulate, after all.  Seriously, Hillary Clinton would make a fine president in my opinion.  The only problem is that the extreme right is scared to death of her.  No way she will be elected.
925864
None. This is a proven fact as he failed in every business he tried before going in to politics. Although perhaps he would be excellent running a demolition company.
972190
He's been the President I have wanted him to be and I don't really give a crap if the loony lefties like it or not. They had their 8 years with their big hero Billy Bob Clinton who was more interested in getting his knob polished than he was in carrying out the duties entrusted to him. Clinton's legacy is a pair of dirty-kneed pantyhose and a stained blue dress, a looted White house and a wife who was indicted for frauds and would probably be in prison if they hadn't found a sympathetic Democratic dishonorable judge. I think she probably would have thrived in prison.\n\nGeorge Bush has restored a sense of honor to the White House that was sadly lacking during the reign of the horny hillbilly and his despicable supporters who just can't get over the fact that their handpicked successor to Clinton crashed and burned because he's got the IQ of a dead clam.
592303
I agree wholehearted about the PEPSI...Look at Jeff Gordon. But there isn't time to Impeach George W. He would get out much the same as Clinton    ANYWAY.
988920
As bad as the GOP looks now, unless they pick some extreme right wing nut case, hillary doesn't stand a chance. Not becuase of the whole monica and bill thing but becuase she doesn't relate to the people. What would make this country a lot better place is if it didn't cost so much to run for president so a blue collar candidate could stand a chance.
332322
bad choice.\nall he can do just overreacting about what should american do to protect themselves.\nhow about the economy, relation with other nations.\nis a too ego/hypocrate men.\ni prefer clinton.im sure u will agree with me.
1000069
I loved Clinton. Our country was in much better shape when he was President. I mean think about it, if the worst thing Bush had done was lie about getting a #@%$&^#, don't you think America might be a bit better off than we are?
1083780
Finally, Phyllis Schlafly gets her scholarly due. While historians have focused on the periphery of politics -- dwelling into ever narrow corners and cracks of the American Left -- Phyllis Schlafly has had no honest assessment. Plenty of dishonest, superficial assessment based on hand-me-down "that terrible woman" stories, but little more. (...). \n\nProfessor Critchlow is the dean of U.S. policy historians and he has taken a brave step tackling a figure so unpopular among academics. Then again, I am reminded of that member of the chattering classes who said, "I can't believe Nixon won , I don't know a single person who voted for him!" Critchlow batters that academic insularity to explain how and why Schlafly's message spawned "grassroots conservatism." Let's hope some who would rather not hear, do listen. \n\nThe alternative offered by Critchlow's study is, to take a quote from one of her best-selling titles, \n\n"A Choice, Not an Echo" of the silly things constantly said \nabout her and other movement conservatives. \n\nWake up historians (left or right), you have nothing to lose but your ignorance! \n\nSee the site below for much more info.
1175510
Clinton's bi-partisan passage of the "Welfare Reform Act", not that it actually changed much, but it was a step in the right direction.\n\nI know, it was a conservative idea, but he signed it.\n\nSorry, that's all I have.
314510
Gotta love these Republicans. When things go wrong the 1st thing they do is BLAME IT ON CLINTON! For some reason I think that the RNC sent out a book to all registered party members and that is all it says. Well I have news for you all, it is 2006, Clinton has been out of office for 6 years now. This is your mess, not his.  If you would read something other than Druggy Limbaughs crap, or O'Rielly's junk, and see the other side of the story you might see that there is some merit to what Progressives in this country want to do.
1125532
the dems are hopeless... for the last decade they've been trying to shift center/right for votes to the point where they have no principles or fundamentals anymore. sigh. clinton was a great president in many ways, but he may very well have destroyed the dem party (by starting the race toward the center). anyway... i hope al gore runs again. i'd rather see him run and lose than have one of these unpricipled wafflers actually win.
336270
no...  in office... he was an idiot...an ineffective liberal president who's  term will never stand out in history...its nice that he has found something worth while to dedicate his life to...  now if he would only stay out of politics..lol...