Why haven't they caught Bin Laden yet?  They have Hussein.  He was more responsible for 9/11.?
966700
Bin Laden is more valuable to the intelligence and military communities while "at large".  They get additional funding and get to step on a few civil liberties along the way and people will accept it.  This happens during every major conflict for example internment of Japanese citizens during WWII.  We can only hope that things get retunred to normal in 40-50 years when all the terrorists have been rounded up.
1151181
Wow, talk about bad timing on this question.  After the 500 or so raids last week after we got Zarqawi, we have turned up loads of documents that show that not only had Saddam been working directly with al-Quaeda, he had also been working with the Taliban.  The problem it, there are tens of thousands of documents and not many translators, so there is probably a whole lot more information coming.
629055
Superman would not support a war.  He would tell Bush leave him to me.  He flies in their and grabs Osama Bin Laden from the hole he's been hiding in and takes him back to the U.S. for trial.  It would be nice to think if Superman was real how many lives could have been saved in 9/11 and the War on Terrorism.
779876
The folks at the Pentagon no longer let me sit in on the intelligence briefings.  I do know that Iraq did not cause 911, and nobody in the government has ever said it did.  I don't know where this inaccurate info came from .  Why would you think you would be in the loop in regards to the status on bin laden?  Don't you think that the fewer the people know what's going on, the better chances we have in catching him off guard?
858922
i think it is bush and bin-laden. not america. dont get us confused.
733215
I'm not sure what your point is - they never did find evidence of WMD's in Iraq, and there was no legitimate connection between Al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein's government.  (I'm with you on the 9/11 bit.)  What do you want the extreme-liberals to learn - to deny reality?
1160855
I dont understand how any intelligent person  like yourself can beliieve  that Bin Laden and his band of Retards didnt plan and execute  the attacks on 9-11.   He has admitted it many times in his tapes.   American people for the most part are easy going  until savages  try to kill us. THen we will teach you what savage is  :D
999680
He said he did it.  Duh!  And more than that the terrorists captured that couldn't make it with the rest were linked to Bin Laden.\n\nAnd, since Bin Laden isn't an American citizen (Thank goodness!) he isn't entitled to the right layed out in the constitution.
48174
First of all It's Osama Bin Ladin. He is just like u and me but more desperate, he had seen more brutality than us, has more money and a god damn organisation. He just like us hated when our brothers and sisters are hurt and killed without proper reasons but he acted differently. He just took a step a little further. He is said to be involved in 9/11 attacks. If that's true he did something really wrong. But to him it's fine coz America did and doing the same thing to his muslim brothers and sisters. Whatever it is, he shouldn't have done that. Now, there's no difference between him and America.
425673
I agree with deedlebay, w.o.m.d. were just a cloak to get into Iraq. Hello people I thought we were going into war to defend our country because of 9/11. We have people from America and other countries dying everyday and we still haven't got Bin Laden?!? \nNot only that but Saddam is on trial for events that happened in the 1980's not for the innocent lives that were lost on Sept.11th. Where is their justice?
7434
Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11.  Saddam definitely did, at one point, have WMD's but the Allied forces removed/destroyed them all in the first gulf war.\n\nBush, on the other hand, used 9/11 as an excuse to attack Saddam.  This is something many of us believe he intended to do long before 9/11.
822121
Someone ask the dictator to explain himself?  Of course not, they would have been ushered from the White House as quickly as possible.  It's very clear, from all reports, that Bush doesn't listen to anyone who doesn't kiss his butt and just accept everything he has to say.  Colin Powell ring any bells?  I fully agree with what this question seems to suggest.  Bush 41 should have finished Hussein when he had the chance, and Bush 43 should have set aside his obsession with Iraq and finished the job in Afghanistan.  Now, thanks to him, the terrorists are now in Iraq in droves.  Self-fulfilling prophecy?  I suppose so, he claimed connection between Hussein and 9/11 before the evidence forced him to admit there was no connection.  Now he can talk about the terrorists being in Iraq all he pleases, we blew the country wide open and gave them very safe passage inside.  Good job again Bush.
822976
I believe he sincerely thought he was doing right. The first suspect after 9/11 was Iraq's dictator after Operation Desert Storm and sanctions. He was our greatest enemy at the time. Now, we have only made new enemies and one of our oldest, much more influential and powerful. He was basing his decisions on the information presented to him, after all, he was not the one performing actual investigations and research. I truly believe he is a good-hearted person who was mostly mislead by advisors.
708819
It is more important that stability is built in Iraq.  We want Bin Laden, but he's just one guy.  In fact, Kaleed Sheik Muhammad, the actual mastermind of 9/11 has been captured years ago.  Bin Laden is just money and a figurehead.  He is dangerous and needs to be captured, but it is more important that stability is brought to the middle east.
890804
David, glad to see you are thinking well at such a young age!\n\nIraq had nothing to do with terrorism before the invasion.\n\nIn fact, had Osama bin Laden been in Iraq prior to the removal of Saddam, he would have done everything he could have done to kill him as well.  Osama was not trusted or liked by Saddam.  Fanatics are a threat to all nation's, not just free ones.\n\nThe terrorists that bin Laden leads were OUR ally in the Afghani war against the former Soviet Union.  We trained and supplied them during that conflict.  That is why they are so effective at attacking us now.\n\nThey didn't turn their attention towards us until we placed a permanent base in Saudi Arabia.  That base, in Riyadh, was near Mecca and Medina, two of the holiest cities in the Muslim faith. They saw it as an affront to their faith that infidels (Non-Muslims) were so close to those cities.\n\nThe Iraqi battlefield has degenerated into civil war and insurgency, not necessarily terrorists.  \n\nIf we were occupied by  foreign force, we would be doing anything we could to repel them.  That is the part the current administration doesn't understand.
766914
Personally I don't care about Saddam.. if anything I'm aggervated by it.. because we waged war over there caught their leader.. and yet we still have never caught Bin Laden or do we have any idea where he is....
20673
If they've caught BinLaden they would have made sure to publicize their "victory" to everyone as was the case with Saddam Husseing. But surely they haven't and anyway the US was the one who got him in order to use him to fight Russia and then he turned around on them!!!!