difference between "boss's order" and "boss' order"?
966270
Boss's order:  You have one boss and its his/her's order.\nBoss' order:  You have more than one boss and its their order.
896262
Grammatically, they're both correct.\n\nIf you're using this sentence in some kind of composition, your biggest problem is that the sentence has an inconsistent tone. The middle of the sentence has the sophisticated "atypical dialects," while the beginning and end are much more conversational and less descriptive.\n\nBut if you're asking me to pick, I would say the second.
129873
order = society\nchaos = war\norder = marriage\nchaos = divorce\norder = friendship\nchaos = ememies
781394
On the basis that you are serious, and why should you not be here is an answer!\n\nA 'boss' is someone who sees that everything is done without doing anything himself\n\nA 'team-leader' is someone who sees that everything is done without doing everything\n\nA 'worker' is someone who see that as much is done as is necessary to keep his job.\n\nA 'dosser' is someone who does as little as is necessary to do his job.\n\nA 'manager' is [supposed to be] someone who keeps them all happy.
190570
BODMAS and PEMDAS are equivalent order of operations. \nP is parentheses, B is brackets which are pretty much the same objects. \nHere we refer to powers and roots as exponentiation, and thus the E in PEMDAS. Others refer to these as Orders, hence the O in BODMAS.\nDivision and Multiplication are the same operation (multiplication) which is associative so the order is irrelevant.\nBoth orders of operation are the same.
586694
private\nprivate(2)\nprivate first class\ncorporal or specialist(corporl has leadership responsibilties, specialist doesn't)\nsergeant\nstaff sergeant\nSergeant first class\nmaster sergeant\nsergeant major\n\nfor officers it goes\n2nd lieutenant\n1st lieutenant\ncaptain\nmajor\nlieutenant colonel\ncolonel\nbrigadier general\nmajor general\nlieutenant general\ngeneral
1021299
cheque or money order
691650
No, they are not the same. The first one is grammatically incorrect & should not be used. The second is grammatically correct & is used in the context of the comparison e.g "Isn't there the same problem in the English government as in the American government, in regards to international trade?"
413611
The first means something like "woah."\n\nCheck out the following link, which provides a helpful little cheatsheet.
530738
There is no language where word order is totally free.  That is a myth.  There are two strategies for marking the relationship of qualifier-qualified.  The first is word order.  The adjective occurs right next to the noun it modifies (or the adverb next to the adjective/adverb/verb it modifies).  The strategy that is usually adopted in languages with a highly marked declensional system is that the adjective carries a similar or identical declensional ending to the noun it modifies.  In the case of adverbs, word order is still generally the means used.
133237
"subordination" is an interesting choice of words? and if subordinate is a thoughtful choice, then why move? what would you consider subordinate about Canada. (i will assume by your condecending, egocentric wording that you are ehem American?)\nClearly you have never left America or you wouldn't have the tone you do. You should go and move to Australia where they'd love you and you would go insane with all of the subordinating subordinate subordination...
635295
The boss drives people; the leader coaches them. The boss depends on authority; the leader on good will. The boss inspires fear; the leader inspires enthusiasm. The boss says "I"; The leader says "WE". The boss fixes the blame for the breakdown; the leader fixes the breakdown. The boss says, "GO"; the leader says lets, "GO!
1091709
Communication in business is watching your "p's & q's" a little more closely than usual.  Slang is frowned upon and communication is also culturally sensitive.  The direction/flow means that it is directed to the person resposible for acting upon it.  Problems/concerns always filter up through imediate supervisors. It is always frowned upon to jump up and over someone in the line of command.  There isn't much difference in writing/speaking except that writing is more direct and to the point because busy people don't want to read extra details they don't need to.  The language of business depends really on the business itself.  It's amazing but each business tends to have it's own language.  It depends on the industry and each group of people within a organization develope their own way of communicating with each other.
493882
First question: I can say both if I want to your not my boss. Well, in fact I don't have a boss, I'm retired. Second question: BOTH
690555
easiest = english\nhardest = latin
474663
This question is more complicated than it seems.\n\nFirst of all, both possibilities have been available in English for a very long time.  A couple of hundred years ago, some grammarians looked around and decided that they didn't like that there were two possible ways of saying something, so they decided to make some rules about it.  They decided that, whenever you have an object of the preposition "than", you should put it in nominative case.  That means that, according to many grammar books, the correct answer is "Are you better than I?".  Their reasoning is that the part that comes after "than" is a shortened version of something else, like this:\n"Are you better than I am (good)?"\n\nHowever, to many native speakers, both "I" and "me" are possibilities in this context, so it might only be a concern to you if you are planning on using this sentence with someone who might judge you for it (for example, a boss or a professor).  Anyone else might not even notice.
686764
calender\nceller\ncollor\ncorner\ndanger\ndirector\ndoctor\ndollar\nfinger\nhorror\nhunger\nlabor\nladder\nmaster\nmotor\nofficer\nother\npower\nregular\nsugar\n\nsame as the guy above me, but he mixed up regular and sugar. also, i take it that you mean alphabetical order