Would the election turn out increase if they had the Deal or No Deal girls working the polls naked?
956287
Hell, I can't even deny that one.  Let's see.  Beautiful, leggy b*tches or old, saggy 80-yr-old women.  Let's bring out the eye candy and more young people would be voting.
76760
Of course...\n\n..it just depends on who they place their bet on.
927027
Not exactly, but that's as close a parallel as you can make with the Democrats sort of like the Laborites.\n\nYesterday's election would be a lot like a no confidence but bush will not do the gentlemanly thing and step down, the next election will be in 2008.
253447
absolutly,positivly,150%,and you bet...lol\n\nnow we just have to decide...\n\ndo the women or men get it...?..LOL
1165929
no-but most girls are whores-it is that women lib stuff
1160404
It's possible that she could win, but not on my vote.
1113217
What an interesting question.  I think you are right - I expect it would make a huge difference - especially if it included those countries where women currently can't hold office at all.  I imagine there would be far fewer wars as I don't think most women would choose a path of direct action (such as the war in Iraq).  I would like to think there would be more nurturing and care across the board - but that depends on the women.  I mean, look at Margaret Thatcher - she wasn't exactly the warm and fuzzy type.\n\nI think the best thing would be if there could be a more even match of men and women in power, perhaps we would see more balanced leadership - who knows!
812223
Don't expect them to announce too loudly their plans for tax increases, granting amnesty to illegal aliens, firearms registration/confiscation, election deform, and big increases of foreign aid to terrorist nations like Sudan, Venezuela, Russia and South Africa. After all, they would not want to scare you away before they plead with you to vote for Hillary.
275071
Hillary has more experiance, goveners wife, presidents wife, senator\nCondaleeza, I wouldn't vote for because of her present employer
587378
Next election we have 2 female candidates, and I believe both are the favored candidates. \nSecondly a womans nature isn't to lead in a head position, but in a behind the scenes position. I'm not saying it's impossible, however, most wouldn't exactly shine. Third, the number of female candidates has been far to low for one to have been elected. Fourth, foreign negotiations would probably have trouble with a female leader. Many countries still have women in lesser positions and believe women aren't fit for head positions in anything. A probably distant fifth reason is that some guys wouldn't except a female president so they would lose votes there, but noone's ever gonna be excepted by everyone. Don't take this as unfair treatment, it's fairly equal, and it's also natural. Most people I know would be open minded enough to accept a woman, that was qualified, to be president.\n\nI believe that's 5 good reasons, and also I gave you some info on the fact that we might soon get a female president, so whatever sexism you were trying to 'bring to light' or w/e  you should probably drop. Sexism is similar to racism, most is fueled by the person who is 'hurt' by it, for the simple reason that they can't understand, someone's always going to find some reason not to like you, it doesn't matter what you say. If you're perfect in every other way, they'll use your race, your sex, or your ethnicity against you. Grow past it and stronger than it and you'll probably notice less of it.\n\nAnd trust me, just because we get women leaders, we would not be without war. Men are more logical than women, and women act on emotions. Emotions are feelings and feelings are temporal. If a girl's on her period and then also ends up with some problem with her kid if she's married, and then has to negotiate with Russia, I'd personally be scared. That's one of the reasons women operate better behind the scenes. But my point was, impulse and emotion cause a whole lot more fighting than logic does. Women are human just like men, and there's going to be fighting regardless.
603404
Possible? Yes. Probable? No.\n\nThe politicians in power have redrawn the voting districts to such a degree that many politicians run unopposed, because there's no way anyone else can get enough votes in their districts to unseat them. To get them out, it will take the people who put them in in the first place to stand up and demand a change.\n\nFrankly, I don't see it happening.
1162447
Dont give up your dream. I'll vote for you if I can. Go first girl president!!
728694
no.\n\nboth sides are getting paid by someone who isn't getting any sex.
386199
probably...she won the runoff election
333384
that would depend on the credentials. if a woman canidate is better than a man, i'd vote for her. and vice versa is true too. \n\nwhoever is the best fit for what the country wants.\n\nin this case, i'll vote Nadar!
21192
a sure bet!  i love the clintons, and i could not think of a better, more qualified person to become the first female president in the united states. \n\ndown with the good ole boys!
457470
might get a honest election ?