can anybody explain the rules for interpretation of statutes in business law?
955948
Interpentation is in the eye of the beholder. It's like the glass is either half empty or half full. And if your talking about law, your talking about a language that is all on it's own. No real person would have made up such words that a mear common man could ever dream of let alone say or write. How many are there? Too many, too many for simple people but for the rich and the unjust the more the better!!! Good day Sir.
871008
the law has developed to try to mainetain order and is based larely on what is acceptable to society and business. i do not believe religion has much part in it as many of the more morally based laws are fundermental and instinctive. for example murder is a criminal offence, it is moral but not just religious. laws should be based partly on morals but should also be based on common sense, and what is generally best for firms and society as a whole.
164310
I hate to be brass, but you would be a fool to accept any information on law from anyone except a lawyer. Especially fraud cases. There are somethings that we should never attempt to interpret on our own. The law is number one.
661184
Every aspect is -- and too much for me to research for you.  Do a seach for basic business or employment law.\n\nContract law covers the deal between employer and employee. Labor law covers the deal between employee and employer in addition if collective bargaining is involved.   Health and safety laws cover the work conditions, and minimium wage and other laws set basic compensation levels.  There are specific laws in many states limiting the effect of certain clauses in an employment contract, such as arbitration clauses or non-compete clauses.  The employment of officers and directors are covered by securities laws if a public corporation is involved.  Civil rights laws, both state and federal, cover issues of discrimination against employees or among employees on the basis of race, sex, age and cover issues of sexual harassment.  And so on and so on.
1067267
You might look into Roberts Rules or Order.  Basic text for arguments.  Also has some sample bylaws.
703737
Similar systems are used on other countries as well.\n\nWhere there a multiple possible interpretations, the court should choose the one that makes sense given other laws. This could be to avoid absurdity, or to avoid conflict with other higher laws.
889138
"Common law" is the law that is developed by judges using precedent that can date back as far as 1066 in England.  There are "common law" torts such as assault, battery, false imprisonment, and negligence.\n"Statutory law" is law built from the legislatures (and to some extent, government agencies).  Sometimes statutory law replaces the common law (such as in workers' compensation, which supplants traditional negligence claims against employers).  Sometimes it supplements the common law (such as workplace discrimination and civil rights law -- Title VII).\nIn the same way, a body of "common law" modifies statutory law.  When Congress writes a statute that is ambiguous, it is up to the courts to interpret what the statute says.  On this side, however, Congress is always free to re-write the law to reverse a court's interpretation, or enact a new law if they don't like a court's interpretation of the common law.  The exception to this, of course, is if Congress writes an unconstitutional law (or if a state court writes a law that contravenes federal law) because the federal constitution, federal statutes, treaties, and the state constitutions would be supreme to a state law.
86137
It's a statement of policy.  It's meant to be authoritative and is used as a basis for future regulations and laws although it has no legal standing in and of itself.
679254
Rights of statute :P\nBasically the stuff that companies don't want you to know about, laws and stuff, like if something isn't fit for the purpose intended you can get your money back on it,that kinda thing.
559158
Articles of incorporation are legal documents filed with the state of organization. State statutes provide the forms necessary to complete these and have very strict standards and requirements to complete the forms.\n\nBylaws, corporate charters, company polices, etc, are internal documents in which the managing members, or "owners", agree to.\n\nTo establish Bylaws the company should first be incorporated or organized in the respective state of business. Then, the bylaws should be compiled by the members. Once the bylaws are agreed upon and approved by the majority of members (or unanimously as may be required by some states), the members should all sign the bylaws. Be sure to include in your bylaws provisions for allowing the bylaws to be changed or ammended in the future, otherwise, you're forced to live by them until the organization is dissolved.\n\nIf you feel this answer was sufficient, please vote it best answer. Thank you!
507068
There are both federal and local state rules governing boards of directors, and ethical rules that imposed through case law.\n\nGenerally, if a director is receiving a benefit from the corporation, that is a conflict of interest. The corporation may have claims for unjust enrichment, disgorgement of improper gains, and breach of fiduciary duty.\n\nThe way around this, again generally, is for a director to fully disclose any benefits and recuse themselves (abstain) from any vote that might benefit them personally. That's what I do for the board that I'm on.\n\nWhen in doubt, consult an attorney in your local area to find out what your obligations and liabilities are.
896266
It's as obvious as it seems. \n\nA condition precedent is something that must be satisfied in order to trigger a requirement by another to perform.
933042
Not sure what you mean but perhaps; the law is divided into criminal and civil law and also into statute and case law.\n\nThe division into criminal and civil law is fairly obvious and very broadly speaking civil law may be regarded as being concerned with contracts made between people and or companies or states.\n\nStatute law are the laws passed by government a system we inherited from the Romans. Case law is derived from the old Anglo-Saxon system of justice is based on precedence established in previous cases it is also concerned with interpretation of statute law.
1127239
An Act to define and amend the law relating to the sale of goods\n\nWHEREAS it is expedient to define and amend the law relating to the sale of goods;\n\n\n\nIn this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject of context,-\n\n    (1) "buyer" means a person who buys or agrees to buy goods;\n\n    (2) "delivery" means voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another;\n\n    (3) goods are said to be in a "delivered state" when they are in such state that the buyer would under the contract be bound to take delivery of them;\n\n    (4) "document of title to goods" includes bill of lading dock-warrant, warehouse keeper's certificate, wharfingers' certificate, railway receipt, 4[multimodal transport document,] warrant or order for the delivery of goods and any other document used in the ordinary course of business as proof of the possession or control of goods or authorising or purporting to authorise, either by endorsement or by delivery, the possessor of the document to transfer or receive goods thereby represented;\n\n    (5) "fault" means wrongful act or default;\n\n    (6) "future goods" means goods to be manufactured or produced or acquired by the seller after making of the contract of sale;\n\n    (7) "goods" means every kind of moveable property other than actionable claims and money; and includes stock and shares, growing crops, grass, and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale;\n\n    (8) A person is said to be "insolvent" who has ceased to pay his debts in the ordinary course of business, or cannot pay his debts as they become due, whether he has committed an act of insolvency or not;\n\n    (9) "mercantile agent" means a mercantile agent having in the customary course of business as such agent authority either to sell goods, or to consign goods for the purposes of sale, or to buy goods, or to raise money on the security of goods;\n\n    (10) "price" means the money consideration for a sale of goods;\n\n    (11) "property" means the general property in goods, and not merely a special property;\n\n    (12) "quality of goods" includes their state or condition;\n\n    (13) "seller" means a person who sells or agrees to sell goods;\n\n    (14) "specific goods" means goods identified and agreed upon at the time a contract of sale is made; and\n\n    (15) expressions used but not defined in this Act and defined in the Indian Contract Act, 1872, have the meaning assigned to them in that act.\n\n#### LINKS : -\n\nhttp://www.laws4india.com/acts/sga/sga_idx.asp\n\nhttp://www.helplinelaw.com/bareact/index.php?dsp=saleofgoods\n\nhttp://www.indialawinfo.com/bareacts/soga.html
186813
In civil law countries, legislation is seen as the primary source of law. By default, courts thus base their judgments on the provisions of codes and statutes, from which solutions in particular cases are to be derived. Courts thus have to reason extensively on the basis of general rules and principles of the code, often drawing analogies from statutory provisions to fill lacunae and to achieve coherence. By contrast, in the common law system, cases are the primary source of law, while statutes are only seen as incursions into the common law and thus interpreted narrowly.
639112
http://www.businesslicenses.com/
316738
Given my understanding of this question, the basic answer to this question is no, in either civil or common law systems.\n\nObviously, a statute or code cannot cover all sorts of conduct, including future conduct that are not anticipated by a statute or code (i.e. internet regulation).  Here, a court may be used to interpret conduct that is not regulated by some statute or code and give an opinion on the issue at hand.  That opinion, under either common law or civil law, is given "force of law," or precedential value, in which lower courts are under an obligation to follow.