the brady bill is related  to gun control,and the wagner act is related to?
956785
Wagner act is a law that was inacted in 1935. The NLRB or the National Labor Relations Board, wrote an act that would protect employees rights to unionization. Through the use of secret ballots the NLRB conducts a poll to determine if the workers want a union. this way they are not harrassed or threatend when casting their ballots
451095
Go to www.nraila.com.  In the search window, type in any topic of reference you wish to know about. \nThis site deals with facts, not imaginary statistics, or over-emotional diatribes against self-protection.\n\nI'm willing to bet it's in your health class. This is discussed in the June 2002 edition of 'America's Freedom 1st' magazine. The title is "School Daze", and it talks about how gun control groups are using the education system to indoctinate children and teens in their beliefs that guns are evil. The emphasis in such curriculum does not focus on accountabilty or responsibility for one's own action, nor does it suggest that popular media might have more influence on violent behavior than the availability of guns in America.\n \nMy daughter's health class viewed "Bowling for Columbine", hardly a true documentary. In www.nraila.com, type in 'Moore' in the search window. An article there breaks down this film by Moore into it's true pieces of doctored clips and misrepresented items purported as "facts" by Moore and his crew.\n\nSame magazine, December 2001, article titled, "The 7 Myths of gun control" covers the following topics misrepresented by major news newtworks and so-called gun-safety groups, which are anti-gun groups in disguise:\n\n1) Guns increase violent crime\n2) Pulling a gun on a criminal endangers you more than the criminal\n3) Guns pose a special threat to children\n4) The 2nd Amendment applies only to militiamen\n5) The 2nd Amendment is an obsolete relic of the frontier era\n6) We should treat guns the same way we treat cars, requiring licenses for all\n7) Reasonable gun control measures are no threat to law-abiding gun owners.\nThe article takes great pains to explain in depth these myths.\n\nSame magazine, March 2004, article titled, "Why people fear guns", deals with the medias publicizing of criminal gun use more than law-abiding citizens using guns to protect themselves or stop vilolent criminals.\n\nI'll leave you with a quote from President John Adams, printed in 'America's Freedom 1st', April 2006: "Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at inidivual discreation...in private self defense."\n\nI ask that you visit this site, use their search window for various topics such as "England's gun ban", and "Australia's gun ban". There's many articles which point to the direct relation betweent their gun bans & the rise in violent crimes in their countries.\nPlease take your time, read both sides of the issues, not just the ones your teacher may be giving you.
185386
It should be left up to the individual states to decide.  Gun control measures that might seem reasonable in New York or California would be much more impractical or burdensome in other states.
783539
'ABC15.com' has the results listed. Basically, all the props relating to lessening illegal immigration passed...English is now the official language, illegals cannot sue or receive benefits or make bail. Both props relating to changing the way State Trust Land is handled (105 & 106) were NO so it will remain the same. The statewide smoking ban passed. The prop to prohibit confinement of animals passed. It looks like AZ is the one state where the Protect Marriage prop is not passing. The minimum wage increase passed...so we should see all grocery prices also increasing within the month. The eminent domain prop appears to have passed...so our taxes will be going up to pay all the frivilous lawsuits resulting. Check the website for complete details.
887966
Well, if you search for "Bill of Rights", and read through them all, that may give you some ideas. The Founding Fathers not only wanted to eliminate the abuses of King George (housing soldiers without permission of the owners; search and seizure without due process etc), but also, in their wisdom, wanted to protect our rights in the future.\n\nThe Patriot Act, was, of course enacted after the events of 9-11. There are still many unanswered questions about the events of that day; it was an act of terror, that not even Russia could have pulled off -- who then "threw the switch"; who brought down America's security screen? and, for what purpose? Didn't the Nazis do something similar, in the events around the "Reichstag Fire"? Didn't they suspend the German Constitution, in the name of "Protection"? Wasn't it the case, that then elections were suspended, for about 12 years?? Shouldn't we as citizens, be asking some tough questions, about this administration, and the President's "signing statements"? Why didn't the President, follow legal procedure, when ordering wiretaps of American citizens?\n\nIf we accept a suspension of our rights, what then can we expect? Does the Patriot Act, really provide any more protection, than we had before? Is there, perhaps, an "enemy within"??\n\nA few years ago, there was a case of a sniper, in Maryland and in Virginia, who murdered a number of people. One man was quoted on the news, "If we have to have a police state, so that I can mow my lawn in peace, then let's bring on the police state".\n\nIs that any way to live?? If we could put a man on the Moon, don't you think we (and other nations working with us) could root out the source of terrorism, if someone really wanted it to be stopped??\n\nHope that helps, to give you some ideas.
599108
How about:\nUSA PATRIOT Act, that was certainly controversial.\nH. R. 3162\n\nhttp://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.3162.ENR:\n\nFor research tips:\n\nTHE BEST WAY to research legislative history is to go the Library of Congress. They keep the record of ALL hearings on the bill(both committee and floor) and any statements made by congressmen and any other people that Congress has questioned regarding the bill etc etc etc.\n\nThe website given by previous answerer will help:\nIt is the website of the library of congress:\n\nhttp://thomas.loc.gov\n\nI would also suggest reading this site(it is very helpful):\nhttp://www.llsdc.org/sourcebook/fed-leg-hist.htm\n\nSome trivia:\nSupreme Court Justice Scalia hates legislative history, and considers it not useful.\nHe once was quoted to say something to the tone of:\n"I had to exile my clerk to the dungeon to dig through useless pile of legislative junk"\nSo you are not alone in being frustrated with legislative history.\n\nP.S. I hope you are paid for this thankless task.
287436
There's two\n Roberti-Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989\n.50 Caliber BMG Regulation Act of 2004
268763
Bill of Rights.\n\n(but Drama Guy's answer four below mine is the best)
701836
Something very timely for your presentation might be to include a section on the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA) that's currently making its way through Congress.\n\nThe AETA is designed in part to protect researchers from attacks on their work and their personal lives.  You can find more info on the bill at http://www.nabr.org.  It's a relatively straightfoward piece of legislation that could have a big impact.
195899
gun control, abortion, cable vs. sattelite, repub. vs. dem., gay marriage, legalizing marijuana.
600309
here some article I came arcoss\n\nsomething to think about\n\nhttp://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=168993\n\nhttp://www.christiangallery.com/walsh.htm\n\nhttp://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/archive/index.php/t-17962.html\n\nJohn Walsh Does it Again!\n\nI don't watch the John Walsh show since he did his hatchet job on women who use guns to protect themselves. But as I flipped through the channels today, I saw a brief mention of the word "guns" on the Walsh Show and just had time to see a text blurb at the bottom of the screen claiming, "almost 40,000 people a year are killed by guns."\n\nOf course, this is another lie.\n\nAccording to the CDC's National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, the number of people who died from firearms-related injuries in the last reported year was 28,663.\n\nOf those, 16,586 (57%+) were suicides.\n\nNow, if you haven't figured it out by now, John Walsh isn't against guns per se. He's just against the peasants (that's you and me) having firearms. That's right, the very people he relies upon to buy his sponsor's products to support his show are the ones he wants to turn into disarmed victims.
379024
Yes.  I don't want to hit something I'm not aiming at.  According to the constitution it's the only gun control that's allowed in the US.
63924
Parents are definitely responsible for their children's crimes if they contribute to them. A gun owner has a responsibility to keep it locked up, and if he does not abide by that responsibility, he should have to be punished for his part in the crime.
778747
Mitt Romney is the Governor of Massachusetts.
11853
All of them.  Every state has some kind of law which regulates the possession or purchase of a weapon.  Some states are just more strict than others.
89612
Yes, Both contributed to unecisary bloodshed, and it is easy to see similarities between "Homeland Insecurity", and HUAC (House Unamerican ACtivities). I just hope that the patriot act is destroyed, and the rights it, and various other unconstitutional "laws" took are restored to "we the people". I would rather cary a gun through the street to deffend myself than have a single one of my rights taken to "defend" me. Many great americans have died to protect my rights, and may I be damned strait to Hell if I remain silent while Bush, or any other Macarthyite politician takes them with the stroke of a pen.\n\n"He who surrenders rights for security deserves niether."\nsadly, history does repeat. This Cycle MUST be broken.\nAnd yes I would say the same no matter what political party the president was/is/will be from.
714224
I think here in Michigan the biggest issue is whether we are going to allow a person to buy the office of Governor. I think restoring checks and balance to the federal government is also important. Dove hunting has become an issue as well as equal rights.