Since there's now a plethora of info proving that 9-11 WAS an inside job, if you still are a "disbeliever" do
967562
I'm a disbeliever.  However, I'll take you up on your challenge and watch BookTV tonight (I try to catch it whenever I can anyway).  Who is the author?\n\nIf you're suggesting that the current administration (as bad as it is) was complicit in 9/11, then I strongly disagree.  If, on the other hand, you're simply talking about their ignorance and incompetence then, yes, they did have something to do with it.
1098154
you are right to be curious, there are major cover-ups going on regarding 9/11. i would invite you to view www.911truth.org (i'm not affiliated with them).  also www.scholarsfor911truth.org .\n\nthere are many more but those will get you started :)
389891
Apparently not.  It seems many people get their info from one source, and don't care to check if it is credible or not...
1122004
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html\nhttp://wtc.nist.gov/\nhttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/05/911_documentary_removed/\nhttp://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html\nhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html\n\nNow let's have a second try?  G'head, let's see where you go with it.
908900
911 was plotted on Clinton's watch. Time will tell. Angry are we? You guys better get used to it. When you grow up and become a conservative you will understand how stupid you were.
836032
Oh, yes. since you swore to the validity of the information within it
951400
But how much of your "information" is filtered through a system that may not give you the whole truth?\n\nAny source for news will have a bias, regardless of the intention.\n\nNo offense, what proof do you have to support the 90% number you quote?
592988
K-9, I love your insight. People watch too much Fox News and CNN and refuse to do any research for themselves. Ignorance is no excuse, we all should seek truth, no matter what. My husband still proclaims what the media and government has been forcefeeding the US and the world for 4 years, and he thinks I'm insane to beleive any different. He still beleives this after he lost the use of his right leg and permanently injured his spine in combat. It's sickening how some people refuse to see the truth even when it's right in your face. They never gave any CONCRETE proof Al Qieda had anything to do with the WTC attacks. I don't buy it. I see a more sinister possibility of what likely happened...and I'm sure you do too.
358661
So many people claim to be in the know.  Any links, factual evidence, or proof?  People without proof are so quick to give out the glasses of Kool-Aid.
468562
depends ont the evidence found agaist him otherwise they public or atterney may not believe you
797101
Well, the 911 hijackings and terrorists attacks have been declared actions by B.Laden and his supporters.\n\nWith that said, there has since come to light a lot of evidence to support that it was an inside job by 'unknown' government officials. Most suspect Cheney and Rumsfeld.\n\nThere has also been quite a bit of evidence questioning whether or not actual planes hit the Pentagon... but rather it was a bomb.\n\nEither way, at this point, it is pure speculation and I highly doubt we will ever know the truth within our lifetimes.
327290
9/11 was an inside job. (see link) Planned and implemented for this purpose: \nPetrodollar Warfare: Dollars, Euros and the Upcoming Iranian Oil Bourse (see link)
994466
So far there is no proof for him being behind 9/11.  If you knew anything at all you would know  Al Qaeda hates Hussein as much as they hate us.  They were enemies too.  To this day there is nothing that would even suggest Hussein had anything to do with them with 9/11, except from peoples speculation from their ignorance of the subject.
530799
You commented :Could a huge conspiracy like that, which would involve thousands of people, really be kept secret!?\n\nThis should be the biggest evidence AGAINST a conspiracy theory, at least as it applies to a missile or something similar, blowing up the Pentagon instead of the commercial airliner.  The Pentagon is close to several busy traffic routes; these roads were packed with commuters at the time of the crash. There were thousands of people in the office buildings nearby. All of these people became eyewitnesses and if there were any conspiracy, they'd ALL have to have been in on it.  How could it be possible to get every single one of those people to play along?  I just don't get it.\n\nPS--- I was one of the thousands of eyewitnesses and I watched the plane actually hit the Pentagon and even though I've told people my story, they still cling to these conspiracy theories... go figure.
352459
It might be withholding some information on the grounds of national security of for legal reasons but in the main the events of that day are so well documented that it would be difficult to withold any of the salient facts.\n\nThere are conspiracy theories that 9/11 was orchestrated by the FBI and other US agencies but as with all conspiracy theories, they don't stand up to even the most basic of examinations and are based on ignorance not fact.
1166933
This video is very compelling evidence that there's a lot more to the events of 9/11 than most people know.  A few of the things in the Loose Change video are inaccurate, but it compiles enough accurate information to lead to further questions.  \n\nTo the people who say things like "this has all been disproven" or "it's just conspiracy theories" you are fooling yourselves.  The famous philospher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) said “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident”.  People will believe any lie either because they want it to be true, or because they fear it is true.  The lie you are believing is that the official story of how the events of 9/11 occurred are true.  When you OBJECTIVELY analysis the scientific evidence -- as a detective or scientist would -- without injecting false patriatism into the equation -- you realize that it is simply physically impossible that things happened as we've been led to believe.\nAnd  as a side note, questioning the events of 9/11 is NOT unpatriotic.  On the contrary, it's about the most patriotic thing you can do.  We have a duty to defend this great nation of ours against ALL threats, foriegn AND DOMESTIC.  And the families of the victims of 9/11 have a right to know the TRUTH of how and why their loved ones died.  In that spirit, I present the following very small bits of information concerning the events of 9/11.\n\nYou can’t collapse a skyscraper with jet fuel.\nMany engineers have come forward and said that there’s no way those buildings fell from fire.  Steel doesn’t weaken until almost 2000 degrees F, and it doesn’t melt until almost 3000 degrees F.  Jet fuel doesn’t burn hot enough to do it.\nThe official NIST report states “The initial jet fuel fires themselves lasted at most a few minutes” and office material fires would burn out within about 20 minutes in a given location. (NIST, 2005; p. 179, emphasis added.)   The final NIST report on the Towers admits:  \n"Of the more than 170 areas examined on 16 perimeter column panels, only three columns had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250ºC… Only two core column specimens had sufficient paint remaining to make such an analysis, and their temperatures did not reach 250 ºC. ... Using metallographic analysis, NIST determined that there was no evidence that any of the samples had reached temperatures above 600 ºC."  (NIST, 2005, pp. 176-177) \nKevin Ryan, the engineer from the company that underwrote the towers, said it was impossible that a jet fuel fire brought the towers down.  The architect who designed the twin towers has repeatedly said that he designed them to take not 1, but 2, massive passenger airliner impacts and not fall.  \nPools of molten steel were found in the basements of the towers (including tower 7) weeks after 9/11.  Steel melts at 2777 degrees F.  Jet fuel burns at only 1577 degrees F.  It is literally impossible for jet fuel fires to get hot enough to melt steel into molten pools.  Something else must have done it.\n\nFirefighters and survivors said repeatedly that bombs were going off throughout the towers, on many different floors. Firefighters gave very specific descriptions of seeing flashes of light and explosions going off on the lower levels.   If you watch the news from that morning, you'll even see Fox news reporting a "4th explosion" going off in tower 1.   For instance, at the start of the collapse of the South Tower a Fox  News anchor reported:   “There is an explosion at the base of the building… white smoke from the bottom… something happened at the base of the building!  Then another explosion.”\nFirefighter Edward Cachia independently reported:  \n“[We] thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came
1133783
This is a little long, but very insightful and thorough.  If you have some time you NEED to watch this.\n\nhttp://www.planetquo.com/Loony-9-11-Conspiracy-Theories\n\nI think that there is something bigger going on here.