does physics fundermentally explaining chemistry?
959768
I think so.\nFor calculating the forces between atoms in molecules, you can solve this problem now, for small molecules using the law of physics.\nHowever for large molecules it is not the case and you must use approximations
976374
Yes, hence the reason it is refered to as the THEORY of evolution. \nSo, your point is???  Do you know that the THEORY of relativity (E=MC^2) explains why nuclear reactions take place.  Perhaps we should stop believing in electricity next.
59368
Physics ........ Is that what you are looking for?
190569
Only if you show your work and do not expect them to do the question for you; only to provide hints and guides.\nhttp://www.physicsforums.com
1059164
Chemistry is the basis of all science. Without it, many of the technological advances would not have been able to occur. There is much more you could use but I'm just too tired right now to think of anything else. Sorry.
278627
Chemistry explains at the atom/molecule/electron level how atoms interact.  For medicine, a good understanding of chemistry lets us know exactly how the medicine works.  This is useful to develop other medicines that work but are safer.
914705
Yes. See link. \nYou don't need help with science. \nYou need help with using the internet. \nUse of google and wikipedia is highly beneficial if looking for information.
71132
Chemistry science projects depend a lot on creativity and at what level yoy are studying the subject. You can easily just demonstrate the neutralisation of different acids by bases or \nvice versa. You can also show some properties of various gases like chlorine and sulphur dioxide by performing relevant reactions.
356457
Make up your mind. Physicist or chemistry?
204778
Physics.  I like that physics explains things that I see in the world around me, like why airplanes stay up, how bows and arrows work, that sort of thing.  It just seems more real than biology (which also happens all around and inside me, but I can't really see it to think about it) and chemistry (same thing, I just don't think about it as often).
1090100
This can be answered very, very simply.\n\nRelativity works well in  in it's area of expertise, astronomy and space science.  Basically, the scientists took the answers (how the planets revolve around the Sun, the Mass of the planets and stars, how the stars and galaxies move) and created an elegant series of equations to explain them all.  They believed their equations to be correct because this is what they were observing, so it must be true right?\n\nWell no, as we built better telescopes we began witnessing objects and entire galaxies moving far too fast for their observed mass, defying the equations and defying gravity!  It wasn't light pressure robbing these celestial objects of a few arc seconds, which is what sprung Einstein to whop up Relativity.  Venus was so much of a mystery, but Einstein cracked it, right?\n\nWRONG!  If the atom doesn't fit, you must aquit!  Electromagnetic forces have been known to cause these very same effects we witness the galaxies doing.  If the astronomers can't explain something they see, they blame it on magnetics.  Double-helix galaxies, just like our DNA, are floating around out there.  That should tell you where you should start looking to explain the molecular and Universal connection.\n\nVenus' orbit is nearly a perfect circle, and it spins the other direction very slowly.  It used to be called the hairy planet, the smoky planet, and bearded planet.  It's latin name means morning star.  It was literally glowing!  I'm sure some electromagnetic stuff was going on with it, and that would help explain it's brand spanking new surface.\n\nhttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuzSsKSIJO_WapqWQB7tQcPsy6IX?qid=20060612222952AAFdmeo\n\nMars got blown the hell up.  That's a start on finding out about it right there, google should take you the rest of the way.  Hope this helped you understand why those two theories will never be united.  One of them, relativity, was based on a few wrong assumptions.
317299
Ever since man took an interest in the sciences, from perhaps the time of Aristotle onwards, from time to time great ideas have been put forward. Some of these have seemed initially ludicrous, and turned out to be so. Others, with a little development, have given us a great insight into the way that the world works and enabled us to move on. \nAt a given moment of time, it may appear that what we know is fairly correct and will correct timelessly. However, history has shown that this is not the case. Eventually, perhaps, we will know everything, but right now this is far from the case. \nTake one of the fundamental aspects of physics, for instance. For a long time now people have thought that the matter is made up of tiny, invisible particles; atoms and their sub-components. This is the model we learn and that everyone worked around. \nYet in recent times, this has been challenged, by what is known as string theory - and it now seems that this is a better model, perhaps the more 'correct' one. \nString theory, against the traditional theory of matter, says that matter is caused by the vibrations of a string-like structure. These are the fundamental building blocks of matter. It is a bizarre sounding radical theory at first, but now has much support. \nJust like a violin string when plucked will produce sounds, and different sounds when plucked in different ways, so it is with the universe - with string theory, the fluctuations give rise to matter. On this view, the universe may romantically be described as a symphony. The framework of the vibrating string causes the song that we see around us. \nThis, then, in outline is string theory, and it has greatly changed the way that modern physicists do their subject.
329767
You might be looking for information on alchemy, not chemistry.  The two fields of study are very seperate these days.  Of course, modern scientits could turn lead into gold by nuclear fusion, or turn heavier elements into gold by fission- neither process seems practical.
1163866
There is a very large book called "The Handbook of Chemestry and Physics"  This is a very good reference.\n\nAlso, at Barns & Noble there is a forumla sheet called Physics (SparkCharts).  Very helpful.\n\nFinally, look for the Physics for Dummies.  I have found that when tutoring and teaching, the explainations help me to better understand what is happening in terms that I can communicate.\n\nGood luck in your studies.
589672
Good answer Azreal! Scientists in Australia have actually transported light matter across the laboratory in the last year though....hey its a start!
1097382
Chemistry is just like any other science.  You make observations of phenomena, you theorize about what is causing the phenomena observed, then you check the validity of the theory by predicting experimentation, and make sure there is repeatability of the predicted observations.\nThere are alot of things in chemistry that people don't know, and they're working on finding ways to explain/predict those things.  Until then, they have models that explain things which wouldn't be called assumptions because they're not assumed to be true.\nUnless you're talking about the assumptions that simplify equations, which we still do not think are true, they just make equations alot easier to solve.
505249
no.its the force produced due to the movement of other particles(electrons).so..