"I don't definitely travel" or I definitely don't travel" which one is grammatically correct?
956823
Either *could* be grammatically correct, but they have different meanings.  In the first example, you are suggesting that travel is possible, but not definite.  "I don't definitely travel tomorrow; I might wait until the next day" is a grammatical sentence.  In the second example, you are clearly saying that you will not travel--it is definite.\n\nBut the first version is awkward, even if that is the meaning you intend.  It would be far better to say, "I may not travel," if that's what you mean.\n\nGood luck!!
974163
None of them.  \n\nA, C, and D are grammatically incorrect.\n\nB is wrong because the pronoun is not capitalized correctly.
3427
I believe the difference is that the second sentence indicates that you are not expected (supposition) to do something.
608286
Neither...\nThe word THIS is a pronoun or an adjective.\nThis is a good QUESTION!
283404
Science Teacher---if you change the pronoun, then two more of your examples work:\n\n"Singular verbs are in the form associated with one person.\n\nWhich is correct?\nHe sees a bird\nHe fly to town\nHe shirts on his back\nHe walk to town"\n\nTry this:\nHe sees a bird.\nI fly to town.\nI walk to town.\n\nAll of those work if you adjust the pronoun to fit the verb conjugations.\n\nSo the correct answer would be that three are singular verbs: "sees", "fly" and "walk".
54571
No.  It should read, "Please go to the concert with Tammy and me."\n\nIf you remove "Tammy and" from the sentence, it should  still make sense.  You wouldn't say, "Please go to the concert with I."\n\nYou could say, "Tammy and I would like you to go to the concert with us."  Again, if you remove "Tammy and" from the sentence, it still makes sense.\n\nThe rule: Use "me" when you're the object, and "I" when you're the subject.
350819
"Uneased" isn't exactly a word.  You might as well go with "uneasy".\n\nAnd the section starting with "In our life..." doesn't flow from the preceding section.  You should start a new paragraph if you want to go on talking about that.  It would also be more proper to say "In a person's life, he or she...", as the impersonal second person voice usually doesn't have a place in formal writing.\n\nOtherwise, looks good.
186794
An easy way of establishing it is to see what the sentence would sound like without one or two words in it.  So if you would say 'I went to the game', then 'Doug and I went to the game' would be the correct thing to say.\n\nIf you would say - 'The score at the game affected me deeply as my team lost', it would then be OK to say 'The score at the game affected Doug and me deeply, as our team lost!'\n\nSo if you leave the 'Doug and' bit out of the sentence, then the context will tell you which one you should use.  That also goes if you are using either Doug and I or Doug and me as the answer to a question.  'Who broke the window?' 'Doug and I [did]' - the word 'did' being implied.  However, it's very hard to find a context in which 'Doug and me' would be used.  'Who would like to go to the game?' is usually answered by shouts of 'Me! Me!' when really it should be 'I! I!' as 'I would' is implied, and you wouldn't say 'me would'!  So on a stand alone basis 99.9999999999999999% (recurring) of the time, 'Doug and I' is probably the right answer.
691650
No, they are not the same. The first one is grammatically incorrect & should not be used. The second is grammatically correct & is used in the context of the comparison e.g "Isn't there the same problem in the English government as in the American government, in regards to international trade?"
640980
Both sentences are grammatically correct when examined alone.\n\nThe first is talking about a situation in the present.  You would use this expression when you give a gift to someone.\n\nThe second is talking about a future situation.  You would use this expression when you were talking about a movie that the other person plans to see in the future.
533925
we use "for" with "leaving" \nand "to" with "going" or "running" \n\nleaving on (a date, a train)\nleaving for (a destination)\nleaving to (a reason)\nleaving from (a departure point)\n\n\nwhy?  beats me.  It's idiomatic. English usage rules are democratic, not logical.  What 90% of the speakers say, is correct.\n\nThe use of "for" means "with the destination of"  so you can say "headed for trouble" but not "leaving for trouble". \n\n"on" means "in physical contact with" (held by gravity, etc), as in "sitting on a chair", "stuck on the wall"  or "walking on the street"\nalso it means "about" in "speaking on the subject of farming"\nIt could mean "energized" as in "the light was on" \nIt's used with dates, ("on Friday") \n\nI hope this helps.\n\nby the way, a "proposition" is a business offer, commonly understood as an offer of money for sex unless otherwise stated.\n\nThe word you want is "preposition" for a word that comes before a phrase (pre-position)
260367
From an English point of view, it can be kind of complicated.\n\nYou use "qui" when it replaces the subject of a dependent clause.  For example.  "I saw a boat which travels on the sea."  You would ask yourself what is the subject of the verb "travels."  It is not stated in the second clause ("which travels on the sea"), so you would translate "which" as "qui":  J'ai vu un bateau qui voyage sur la mer.\n\nYou use "que" to replace the direct object of a verb.  "I saw a mouse which the cat ate."  In the second clause ("which the cat ate"), the subject is the cat, but the direct object is only known by the previous clause, so you translate "which" as "que":  J'ai vu la souris que le chat a mangée."\n\n(Note:  In the English examples, "which" could be replaced by "that" but the French translations wouldn't change.)\n\nIf it still seems complicated, or if what I wrote is just confusing, maybe you should just look at lots of examples that are in your textbook and somehow make sense out of them.  French grammar is tough.  Good luck!
968926
I know you're going to hate me for pointing this out, but either one is grammatically correct. There is no right or wrong here. It's simply a question of degree. To what degree has your optimism impacted you? What are you really trying to say? Your intent will determine which word you choose. Say each one out loud and go with the one that feels right for your intended message.\n\nAnd by the way -- it's "moments like these WHEN" (not where).
248341
Neither is correct.  When using this phrase, you should say "the reason is..." and then state the reason.  using because or that is is unnecessary.
1044925
One. It just requires a question mark at the end! It's OK apart from that, although as others have said, there are other ways of saying it..! The tense is fine though!\n\nTwo. The second 'travel to London' is redundant - not necessary. I'd replace it with 'go'!! AND, as you would be travelling to London WITH Helen, I'd say 'we' instead of 'I'!\n"If Helen had invited me to travel to London with her, we would go tomorrow."
642216
no 'the'\n\nYou'd say "I'm going diving in Puget Sound" or "I'm going diving in the sound" but not "The Puget Sound."
463139
neither it's tienes que comer mas. but if it has to be one of those 2 you'll have to add another word." tu estas muy delgada (vas a) tener que comer mas" good luck!