Where can I find info about non-petroleum replacements for petroleum products like rubber, perfume, and dyes?
959170
Try looking up websites for enviromental groups.  They may have some good ideas for you.
287229
http://www.liv.ac.uk/ctichem/news_webs_97.html\nhttp://chemistry.boisestate.edu/rbanks/organic/mc/mcquestions317.htm\nhttp://www.wpbschoolhouse.btinternet.co.uk/page04/OilProducts/ExtraOrganicQmc.htm\nhttp://www.chemhelper.com/introtest.html\nhttp://www.sienahts.edu/~swathen/organic/spec-quiz.html\nhttp://www.sienahts.edu/~swathen/organic/aldquiz/quiz2_expanded.html\nhttp://www.chemistry.ohio-state.edu/organic/flashcards/
847347
Please follow the links\nhttp://www.alternative-fuel.biz\nhttp://www.fuel-cell.cc
208085
http://www.chemicool.com/
89632
Simple web search \n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_of_wintergreen\n\nPlus hundreds of others
949715
i dunno...try this...\nhttp://www.ecostello.com/
497599
http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_make.html\ntry the link above
692987
Ok... I was thinking of plastics...my bad..hehe\n\nHere`s some info I found\n\nToday Asia is the main source of natural rubber. Over half of the rubber used today is synthetic, but several million tonnes of natural rubber are still produced annually, and is still essential for some industries, including automotive and military.
486654
try the site http://vivisimo.com it's a meta search engine\ntype in "energetic polymers" and you will get your results!
373023
Ultrasonic cleaners might be the best solution.\n\nHere is an excerpt from the source listed below: \n\nAlthough a range of possible alternative products is available today, experience has shown that substitution of TRI is not easy and even not feasible for a number of specific cases, either for technical or economical reasons. For all cases, substitution of TRI needs a thorough evaluation of all process aspects. For this reason we intend to work with the authorities in order to prevent a blanket implementation of forced substitution, and allow sustainable and continued safe use of TRI. \n\nThe alternatives you will probably consider first are the chlorinated solvents perchloroethylene (PER) and methylene chloride (MC). They match closest the technical features of TRI, such as non-flammability, high solvency power, a wide range of material compatibility and excellent drying and recycling properties.\n\nBeside PER and MC, you have probably also heard about other alternatives such as aqueous (water-based) alkaline systems, flammable solvents (e.g. hydrocarbons or modified alcohol based formulations), supercritical CO2 or hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), etc.\n\nIt is impossible to say definitively which technology is best. That depends on your specific application, on what you are cleaning, which materials you want to remove, the cleanliness required, the variability of the parts cleaned, the throughput to be achieved, the cycle times, etc. \n\nFor example, for the cleaning of parts between two water-based manufacturing steps (e.g. galvanising), aqueous systems may be better, since parts are put into water phase again later and no energy-intensive drying step to remove the water is required. \n\nIf you need to have very clean and dry surfaces (for coating or surface hardening, for example) and if you have a variety of different metals or blind holes, narrow distances and very fine orifices or a lot of residual oil to clean, hydrocarbons or aqueous systems may not clean and dry well enough. In these cases, chlorinated solvents will offer most often the best solution as they are compatible with most materials, have a high cleaning power, are easy to dry, don't leave residual films and are easy to recycle with high quality by distillation. In addition, chlorinated solvents are today best suited to be used in modern closed systems with minimal losses. Their ecological performance has very much increased and, when used in well-operated metal cleaning systems, they outperform aqueous cleaning as long as drying is required. This has been shown by a Life Cycle Analysis carried out by Ecobilan. \n\nPER comes closest to TRI in technical performance and is often the first choice candidate as an alternative to TRI. However, it shows clear inherent technical differences, which need to be taken into consideration. On one side, PER offers a lower volatility and therefore is advantageous to minimise emissions in closed equipment. On the other side, PER has a lower solvency power and is therefore normally used at a higher cleaning temperature to achieve similar performance. This may raise concerns regarding the compatibility with specific metal working fluids and temperature-sensitive parts. \n\nMethylene chloride (MC) shows excellent cleaning properties already at low temperatures, favouring the cleaning of temperature sensitive parts. However, its high volatility makes emission control more difficult and requires special equipment.\n\nHydrofluorocarbons (HFC) and hydrofluorocarbon ethers (HFCE) are very expensive and show very limited solvency power. A thorough evaluation of the global warming potential is also required to choose the adequate product.
442371
try this site.  if you ever need to look up other chemicals, etc. search for msds b/c that is where all the info on storage, etc will be.\n\nhttp://www.chem.tamu.edu/class/majors/msdsfiles/msdsleadsulfate.htm
772873
http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/sbs.html
760173
No. Your best bet is chemfinder.com. You can also find a lot of chemical data on wikipedia. I have to make a table of chemicals for all of my labs and I use those two sites.
740334
um...right...please retype the question. if you want to know more about the branches (inorganic, organic, physical etc) try www.chemistry.org
690270
www.fishersci.com\nwww.aldrich.com\nwww.setonresourcecenter.com/MSDSs/comply1.htm\nwww.chemexper.com\n\nthere are too many to list
512002
Yup, non-polar solvents.  If acetone, alkanes, or toluene don't work, then go with petroleum ether(hist. ligroin) that dissolves alot of things.
1180486
http://refrigerants.dupont.com/Suva/en_US/news/article20060209.html