how does a Lexius   parallel park itself ?
966702
This is just simply from thinking, but here is my hunch.\n\n1.) It usues multiple sensors ie, sonar, cameras to align itself to the parking spot.  These sensors calculate distance, have the ability to get a visual on the targeted spot etc. Then the programming takes the rest.  \n\n2.) It's all about the sensors you have! Ask yourself this question...How does a heat seaking rocket follow a target?\nSensors sensors sensors! and a bit of programming of course!
442472
If the line is parallel then it must have an equal slope. Therefore the parallel line would also have a slope of 0.
740926
Use graph paper and graph out this parallelogram..\nA(-6,0) B(0,10) C(6,0) D(0,-10)\nAngle A = ang C (definition of parallelogram)\nAngle B = ang D (def. of para)\nThe diagonals bisect the angles(given)\nThe diagonals bisect each other(def. of Para)\nUsing side-angle-side you can prove all the triangles formed by the diagonals are congruent. So that means all sides of parallelogram are equal and you have a rhombus.
895437
If you mean the junction between 2 stands during replication, I think it is called a replication fork.
1059949
Depends on what you are putting together.. For some things, it's not important if you screw in all sides evenly.  However for other things that require proper alignment for functionality and ease of construction putting the screws in equally is important.  For example, when you put on a tire for a car, you should put the nuts on evenly (opposite nuts in) so that the wheel remains balancedwhen you drive.  But if you are simply puttng one board to another that does not require balance for the object to function (like wallboard) then it really doesn't matter.
103325
I FOUND IT!\n\nHere: http://www.eldritchpress.org/jwj/auto.htm
499307
Looks like you have a Wheatstone bridge. Why don't you try Wikipedia.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheatstone_bridge
13252
Generally, non-euclidean geometries are geometries that use a different fourth postulate, that, in Euclidean geometry, says that corresponding angles of a transversed parrallel lines are equal.  This basically means that parrallel lines never meet.  There are two other possible postulates.  One is that parrallel lines do meet, i.e. that space is like a globe where longitudinal lines meet at the poles.  The other is that other lines, besides parallel lines don't meet. In this situation space is shaped like a saddle, and lines get farther and farther apart.  Those are the two I know.  There are three other Euclidean postulates (e.g. you can draw exactly one circle through a point in the center and one on the rim) that someone might be able to change, but I am not aware that anyone has done that.
143927
the second proposition is a formulation of Euclid's postulate of the paralleles.\nIt's precisely a postulate, as the same Euclid posed it; rinascimental mathematicians tried to prove it as a theorem, but they failed: in fact Euclid knew well what he was doing.\nThe postulate of the paralleles defines the Euclidean geometry, which is "platonic": it needs abstraction, because you can't apply it on the spherical surface of the Earth.\n\nSo the answer to your first question is no: if you assume spherical geometry, and thus parallels as maximum circles on the sphere, the angles postulate doesn't work anymore.\n\n(Notice that ancient Greeks were able to measure the Earth's radius by astronomycal calculations: so they knew very well how the Earth was not planar ... )
1017458
symetric properety...\n\n\nok heres why.....\n\n(pretend the equal signs are parallel line segments)\n\n===========================\n\n\ndo you see how you can split them dont the middle, thats called the symetric property
747206
good question.  \n\nKind of like why do we park in the drive way but drive on the parkway?
19859
It's the dual meaning of the word "park"\n\nSee the link for a full explanation.
179545
Wow, that last person used way too much stuff.\n\nDraw in one diagonal of parallelogram ABCD, say BD.  You have congruent angles ABD and BDC, ADB and DBC because they are alternate interior angles and BD is congruent to itself.  The two triangles are congruent (ASA) which makes the parts you want congruent by CPCTC.
960583
plz find car position and after \nincrement in car position and car is moving
1072921
I need to do a drawing to answer this. Anyway, here are some usefull sites:\n\nhttp://www.bymath.com/studyguide/geo/sec/geo14a.htm\n\nThe parallel postulate. If parallel lines are cut by a transversal, then corresponding angles are congruent.
622091
no, by definition equipotential lines will always run parallel to each other. That is when they are close together. So they can never cross.
1000294
Well, the horizontal fraction bar is called a "vinculum" but the slanted version is called a "solidus."\n\nEDITED TO ADD: dax is right, btw... the word "solidus" applies to any use of a "slash."  Also, the word "vinculum" applies to any placement of a bar over mathematical symbols in order to group them, like the horizontal bar part of the radical ("square root") symbol (√), or the bar placed over the repeating numbers of a decimal expression.