Why does Ann Coulter get away with making veiled threats?or suggestive comments?
953061
They would've branded her a terrorist. Coulter is a hateful person and I take her as a joke. She is not a serious writer.  She is very to the right, she hates liberal and I bet would celebrate if NY times is bombed. She needs to go to therapy.
923289
I've heard. And to be honest, I'm not surprised. Ann Coulter will be the next one to come out of the closet, you just wait and see.
817723
She was being harassed by a troll. He has been attacking her for days and she lost massive points due to him. He threatened to report everyone of her best answers and so far he is. So she left.\n\nShe isn't suspended, just tired of the crap and packed it up.
957329
The only reason why I would want Ann Coulter to run for President is to embarrass her conservative constituency. Her mendacity and her utter contempt for civilized discourse will make her base look more ridiculous than ever before. Ann Coulter could seal the fate of conservatives ever attaining a high political office for years to come. Maybe then the word “conservative” can be maligned in the same manner that “liberal” has. \n\nOf course another good reason to want Ann Coulter for President, is she would finally be a high profile target for assassination. Seeing a bullet enter that vacuous head of hers might be entertaining. \n\nSorry, that last statement was a parody of something callous Ann Coulter might say.
702205
Tough one.\n\nI do not like Ann Coulter, she thinks her sh_t does not stink. Every bodies sh_t stinks.\n\nDon't know that much about Nancy yet.
1037748
I love when Ann Coulter says things like this about the widows of the 9/11 attacks:\n\n“These self-obsessed women seem genuinely unaware that 9-11 was an attack on our nation and acted like as if the terrorist attack only happened to them. They believe the entire country was required to marinate in their exquisite personal agony. Apparently, denouncing Bush was part of the closure process.”\n\nA good word to describe her starts with a C and rhymes with HUNT.\n\nI agree with Jim Darwin's statement as well.
438088
The expression "laugh out loud funny" is often exaggerated, I suspect. Not so in this case. I quite literally laughed out loud when I read this question, planksheer. Thanks for that, mate!\n\nIn answer to your question, YES! Anne Coulter is demented, and like all demented people (including the vile bundy) the eyes reveal all. There is a derangedly hostile look about the eyes which just screams out pure evil intent. It's actually quite frightening, much like her disturbed and disturbing political views. Hatred as venomous as that which she promulgates on a regular basis is deeply troubling. I feel sure she would prove quite capable of being a serial killer if only given the chance (I'm thinking Liberals would be her targets).\n\nThanks again for a really good laugh (and a very legitimate comparison). Cheers!
1111965
That is a really good question.  I totally agree with you on all points.  Its always sue this person, sue that person.  What happened to freedom of speech?  No one has a sense of humor.  I am a fat woman,  I have been teased all my life.  I think fat women are the last of the species that people can still make fun of.  You never hear anyone talk about the fat bubbas laying on the beach making fun of fat women.  But so what?  I am what I am.  I'm sure not going to sue someone over it.  Or go whinning to the ACLU.
987369
Ann Coulter is the angel of truth sent by GOD..\nYour going to hell with the rest of the liberals for disgracing her!!!
465624
I saw her speak about a year ago when she came to my University.  What you need to remember is that she's essentially facilitating a pep rally.  You dont' logically disect how your team is better in an unbiased manner at pep rallies you get everyone pumped up and tear the other guys down.\n\nAs far as how she's mean spirited I don't think you can make that assumption based on her public speaking.  She's a professional pep monger and you have to be mean to the other guys to be good in her line of work.\n\nLiberals have their own Ann Coulters and their diatribes are often baseless and usually mean spirited.  I assume that they too are intelligent people to be so good at what they do.\n\nPersonally I try to stay above all of it but you have to understand how the political system in this country works. You certainly aren't alone in your frustration with them \n\nThere are at least two of us:)\n\nKeep it cool,\nArmus
185170
Damned good question...\n\nI think some people must have felt very uncomfortable with the kind of things she was saying.  They had the choice to NOT read those things, and they chose to get her booted instead.  \n\nI don't remember reading any answers of hers in inappropriate places.  They were always right on topic.  If someone asks the best way to give a woman an orgasm, why should someone else be booted off for providing an interesting answer?  It's not as if she was answering kid's homework questions now, was it?\n\nRIP foxy.  Don't worry though, she'll be *happy* wherever she is, (or at least 3 times a day she will...)
599558
A dumping grounds for the libs inane rhetoric, maybe, but they all jumped ship on this question, didn't they?\n\nBTW- I see that Mini busted you. Funny how libs swear up and down that you can't string two words together, yet she managed to see right through you anyway.
1015330
Of course she would. Ann Coulter isn't based on reality or logic. She's all about selling books, getting attention. \n\nI think she's as godless as she claims all us liberals are.
298487
She is a phoney and has been exposed as such.  It's a shame more people don't know about this.\n\nSee the website Skeptic.com and search her name.
85552
Recently, an anti-stalking bill was passed by Congress that  akes it a federal crime to "annoy" someone over the Internet, specifically, to anonymously "annoy, abuse, threaten or harass" another person over the Internet.\n \nThis article has more info, and some case examples:\nhttp://www.azcentral.com/offbeat/articles/0219cyberstalking0210.html
300036
Wow - \n\nYou must be mistaken.  I am totally shocked that a liberal, open minded, free thinking member would have anything to do with squelching your individual rights of free speech that were manifested in a forum specifically established to inquire about such matters.  \n\nParticularly because it was such a seemingly relevant question considering the happenings in the world today.\n\nI suppose I shall have to reconsider my opinion.  I wonder if I'm allowed to do that?
1159294
Ann Coulter exemplifies the Republican Party's lack of compassion. She doesn't believe that anyone should be allowed to voice his/her opinions unless they're like hers. If anyone has the right to speak out about 9/11 and the way it has been handled (or not handled) by the government, it's the group of widows Coulter had the nerve to attack. I know that Coulter was also affected personally by the attacks, because a friend of hers, Barbara Olson, was one of the 3,000 who died that day. However, these women lost a lot more. They lost their HUSBANDS! Like one of the widows said in response to Coulter's remarks, they didn't enjoy seeing their husbands being burned alive. Also, can you imagine how hard it must have been for these women to explain to their children that they would never see their fathers again? \n\nMedia outlets like CNN and NBC should really stop giving Ann Coulter air time, so that people will forget that she exists. God knows she doesn't deserve to be taken seriously!