Is CASINO ROYAL correct french grammar?
963148
The Ian Flemming book published in 1953 that is the basis for the movie was also titled "Casino Royale".  The movie simply kept the same title.  If you look at the wikipedia link below, you will see that the title was not the first choice for some... but it does not explain why they allowed a title that is grammatically correct to start with.
669867
It would be usual to say "equipment is".\n\nTheoretically we could say "equipments are" \nand the plural form is accepted in the Scrabble world.
1120265
Salut\n\nEssaye d'aller voir sur ebay , tu trouveras peut-etre ton bonheur.\nBonne chance.\n\nCordialement\n\nMitch62
1174694
The rule states that a past participle must agree with its direct object if the direct object precedes it.\n\nWith a "que" clause, the direct object is normally right before the "que"  as in\n\nLa robe que j'ai achetee est tres belle.    "Robe" is the subject of the sentence but the direct object of the "que" clause and thus the extra "e" for agreement.\n\nAnother example:  J'ai vu les memes films que tu as vus.  "Films" is the direct object of the "que" clause thus the extra "s".\n\nOne more example:  Connais-tu les filles que j'ai rencontrees? "filles" is the direct object of the "que" clause thus the agreement "es"\n\nIn each example the direct object comes right before the "que" and that normally is the case.\n\n"Qui" is  used as a subject, therefore the rule does not apply.    Je vois le garcon qui a gagne le match.  I see the boy who won the game.  "Match" is the direct object of the "qui" clause.  It comes after the verb, therefore no agreement is needed.  Hope this helps.
186597
It's a shame the asker didn't include more of the surrounding text from this article so it could be analyzed more closely.  \n\nAnyhow, grammarians will concur that the structure:  \n\n"...active surveillance and robust peer intervention among high-risk groups such as female sex workers had had an impact in the South..." ,\n\nIS, technically, correct.  Sacramento Dweller was correct in identifying this seemingly awkward grammatical structure as a matter of tense.  Sentences utilizing this particular structure generally fall under the category of "Conditional Sentences."  Sentences featuring the 'had had' syntax are classified as "The Third Conditional," or "Conditional Type Three," and can generally be diagnosed by analyzing them for similarities with following structural formulae:\n\n(The Type 3 Conditional / Third Conditional Formula:)\n\n" IF + <insert past perfect tense verb> + <insert perfect conditional tense verb> = RESULT OF SUPPOSED CONDITIONS.*\n\n*~NOTE:  RESULT(S) of the supposed conditions usually resemble one of the following two structures, depending on when events occurred:  \n\n(1.) Result:  <insert simple present or past tense verb to express an obvious, or predictable fact / outcome>\n\n(2.) Result:  <insert modal verb  + simple present or past tense verb to express a known fact / outcome >\n\nEXAMPLE #1:  "If you had had proper training as an assassin, we would not be in this situation..."\n\nEXAMPLE #2:  "If I'd had proper training as an assassin, you probably wouldn't be here to complain."\n\n(Notice how in EXAMPLE #2, the contractions 'I'd' is used instead of saying, 'I had had' to illustrate the terms of the condition being discussed, though still allowing the reader to ascertain and understand the time-frame and sequence in which events occcurred?)\n\nRules for proper usage of the "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure state that the structures are 'to be used when talking about unreal, or "hypothetical" situations occurring in the past.'  That means, the related events DID NOT 'ACTUALLY' HAPPEN in the past.  Sentences utilizing this structure are almost always phrased to reckon, "If circumstances were different, what could / would have this been like?"  \n\nThe expression of time / tense in this [third] variety of conditional sentence structure IS identified as the past, and indicates that an action was completed "in" the past.  The condition and / or result, therefore, cannot logically be fulfilled because the action in the "IF" clause never actually happened.  Action in "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure is almost ALWAYS characterized by the quality of being absurd, and impossible to achieve.\n\nTense and Terminology?\n\n-Simple Present Tense:  Expresses a fact, habit/routine, or ability.\n\n-Simple Past:  Implies that the action happened before and is not happening anymore.\n\n-Past Perfect (Pluperfect) Tense:  Relates that an action or event ended prior to another action or event.\n\n-Present Perfect (Continuous) [Past-composite] Tense:  Indicates either events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Perfect (Conditional) Tense: Relates varying degrees of certianty or uncertainty about events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Modal Verbs:  incorporated with other verbs to illustrate the notion of possibility, impossability, necessity or other degree of probability.
923622
According to altavista babel fish it will translate french to english an it comes out as "baby of poker" but thats assuming it was french in the first place also tried spanish and italian but go no answer
19114
I'm french and the translation is "Va mourir"\n(go die, without the 'a fire') but it is a rather\naggressive sentence !
1115250
yes i think its french
790365
French in Action.\nwe use that in my french class.
424129
Do you prefer it grammatically correct to the last detail??? I can't edit it right now. My head's really aching but here's some criticism:\n\n1) lots of fragments... like \n\n\n"And in this way you create an environment that everybody can't easily spoil with their Farsi witticism."\n\n"Second, bring up various and brand new subjects."\n\n""While I was already a member."\n\n2) She (is she a girl or a boy?)used transistional devices such as FIRST, SECOND, but no FINALLY or LASTLY\n\n3) "By the way, I tried writing something in the club and it just wouldn't permit it."\n\nIN REFERRING TO THE CLUB AS AN ACTION DOER, SHE SHOULD HAVE USED "THEY"\n\n"By the way, I tried writing something in the club and they just wouldn't permit it."\n\n4) wrong use of clauses\n\n\ncan't think anymore.my head's killing me...need to take some pills..\n\n\n\ngenerally, I think when she was writing this letter, it took her a very long time before actually finishing it...hmmmm.....
713567
I'm sorry... But I barely understand French... I give it a try though! It might not make since... I get my words confused! I should probly stick to The USA version of Y!A. ha ha!\n\n\n simple je le lui dit et de visu pour sentir sa réaction
776520
si je répond correct ya une récompense??
1036299
Un match forcément très serré... J'imagine l'ouverture du score par Ronaldo et puis 2 buts français avant la fin (peut-être pour me rassurer moi-même..) de Trezeguet et... pourquoi pas Ribery?\nLa composition de l'équipe française ne devrait pas être très différente de celle face à l'Espagne.\nQuant au Brésil, le "carré magique" sera forcément présent!
990758
RSVP is correct.\nIf you mean to spell it out in full:\nrépondez, s’il vous plaît
395883
1.quelq'un\n2.quelque chose\n\nthat's easy, give me more darling
657273
a la carte \nfrom the card One of many food, restaurant and cookery terms from French. \n\nau gratin\nCovered with melted cheese. \n\nballet \nlittle dance One of many entertainment terms from French. \n\nbon appétit\n"Good appetite!" Say this before eating. \n\ncafé\nA coffeehouse or small, cheap, restaurant. \n\ncorsage\nIn French, it is a piece of clothing that covers the chest. In English, it is a flower on a woman's dress or jacket. It is the custom for a man to present his date with a corsage to wear on an important evening out, such as a graduation ceremony. \n\ncul-de-sac\n"Bottom of the bag." A street that goes nowhere, but just stops. \n\ndéjà vu\n"Already seen." This is the feeling that people sometimes get, when they go somewhere for the first time, that they have been there before.\n\nfaux pas\n"False step." An action which is not socially acceptable. For example, telling jokes about blind people when a blind person can hear you, or to the friends or family of blind people, is a faux pas. Don't do it. \n\nfemme fatale\n"Deadly woman." A very attractive single woman who breaks many men's hearts. \n\nfiancée\nA woman who is to be married. \n\nfinesse\n"Fineness." Doing something extremely well and delicately. \n\nforte\nLiterally, this is the "strong" section of a sword blade, near the hilt. This is used in English to mean something that a person does better than anything else. "Learning languages is not my forte." \n\ngourmet\nSomeone who knows and loves good food. \n\nhors-d'oeuvre\n"Outside of the work." A snack you eat before the meal.\n\nnouveau riche\n"Newly rich." People who have earned a lot of money recently, and don't have the taste or education to know the proper way to use it. For example, Elvis Presley's house, Graceland, is famous for being very large, very expensive, and very, very ugly. He was obviously nouveau riche. \n\n\nrestaurant\nRestaurant. \n\nrisqué\nRisky. Sexy. \n\nRSVP\n"Répondez s'il vous plaît" means "Please respond." If you get an invitation to a party, the letters RSVP at the bottom mean that you should let the host know if you will be coming. \n\ntête-à-tête\n"Head to head." A quiet conversation by two people about serious or intimate things is a tête-à-tête. \n\ntouché\n"Touched." In fencing (sword fighting) you say this as the other person's sword touches you. In conversation, you might say it if the other person pokes a hole in what you've said. "I hate to spend money." "You spent $50 in the restaurant just last night!" "Touché." The English equivalent is "You got me." \n\nsee this site for more:\nhttp://www.krysstal.com/borrow_french.html
510612
I do, but it's Guadeloupean creole (French West indies):\n1. Doudou: Sweetie, Honey.\n2. Lanmou: Love\n3. Bel ti Famn: Pretty young woman, Cutie.\nHere are three I can think of!\n Hope it helps!