Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is stepping down?
956838
yes i just heard the news they are out thier singing a song for him . something like  nah nah nah hey hey good bye.lmao
701295
Well as far as "dark side" traits go:\n\nRumsfeld has been described as someone who never listens to experts.  He goes by what he wants to do no matter what his top generals have told him.  He is very easy to make mad in meetings when people tell him somthing that he doesn't want to hear.\n  I guess we could say Rumsfeld is fueled by his passion for "self".  He looks inward and cares nothing for those even in his own cadre.  Could Rumsfeld be a Sith?  Yes, but I think he is not that cleaver of one.  If he was really a good dark sider he could be running the country by now as president.
761002
You're right!  And, the drumbeat is no longer just from the left.  Actually, the drum beat has been from the right, all along.  These are the people who know the difference between a politician and a warrior.  Rumsfeld is no warrior!  His decisions have always been political, first.  this is why the old fool never put enough boots on the ground, in the first place.\n\nIt's as though only one person is doing the thinking in this department, and I'm afraid it isn't Rumsfeld.  If that's the case, he definitely should go, because the troops and the demands on them, plus the un-acceptable casualty levels, makes it clear that a military solution is not in his game plan.\n\nNo American president has the right to send Americans into combat to secure a political solution.  we have had enough of that crap.  If you dare to send my family into harms way, you goddamn better be seeking un-conditional surrender.  If not, get your sorry @ss out of the way, so we can put someone in your chair that understands the concept!  George, I hope you're listening!
904992
Nouri al-Maliki should be very concerend. Not that long ago, Bush was saying Rumsfeld was the man for the job. When Bush pats you on the back, it seems like he is showing where the knife should go.
862489
You just can't trust anything Bush says. \nHere's my take on the Rumsfeld resignation. With Democrats taking control of the House and Senate, they will begin investigations for the Bush administration's failures and most likely more. I am really wondering why Republicans have had private talks with Henry Kissinger very recently. Quite possibly, damage control. If you look back to the 70's, Kissinger was part of the Nixon team, when Watergate was investigated. \nBush is trying to raise his popularity rating whether he'll admit it or not.  He'll say anything to make himself look good. Bush only confuses himself not us, not all of us. Bush can't keep the story straight because, he doesn't understand the plot. I think he may finally begin to realize that it's not about him. I am wondering if anyone else saw that none of Bush's best buds were present at the press conference yesterday. No Cheney, no Laura Bush. Does Bush have children anymore?Parents? Must be lonely in the Duck Pond.
916573
Bob Ney resigned because he is going to jail in a bribery scandal. Did the liberals bribe him? I think not! The military has not liked Rumsfeld's leadership, decisions or general attitude for years
903541
He should be removed from office.  Rumsfeld is worse than incompetent.  He is extremely intelligent and knows how to turn any conversation/debate to his advantage.  He and others in the current administration have betrayed the electorate's trust and continually displayed their disdain for anyone whose opinion is contrary to theirs.  They are very good at labelling their critics as non-patriotic.  However, we are all guaranteed the right to speak freely and offer our own ideas by the very Constitution these men and women promise to uphold, then go and violate it time and again.
808566
He's stepping down, now because the republicans lost the midterms. With the democrats in power, there could be all kinds of investigations and hearings in regard to the Iraqi war. Rumsfield would probably still have a job if republicans had faired better in the elections. Although, if the Bush Admin was in fact planing to get rid of Rumsfield no matter what and he resigned two weeks ago as you suggest the media would have had 2 weeks of field days. With none stop debate and commentary about it, for example: "Are Republicans responding to poor poll numbers by forcing Rumsfield's resignation?" or "Obviously a last ditch effort to save the elections" or "Once praised by Pres Bush, Rumsfield resigns" "Rumsfield resigns, due to Iraq war miss-steps?"  and on on on. And all people hear is Republican, President Bush, poor handling of the war, poor poll numbers, Rumsfield resigning. Doesn't look good, even if you support the resignation. One must also consider the Pro-War Republican base that supported Rumsfield retaining his office. It's never a good idea to piss over the base of your party just two weeks before an election, especially if poll numbers are low and voter turn out is vital. \n\nHowever, in hindsight perhaps your right, considering the election results. HOw much worse could it have been for the Republicans?
938273
Forced to resigned with a healthy pension. With Military backing the Democrats would have set sights on Donny's expulsion.\nHopefully Bush is next!
369952
If Bush has any honor and integrity at all he would fire Rumsfeld, yes.
756135
There will be! There were a slew of Generals telling a reporter that the war is in such a mess they don't think any plan can be made that will help! Funny how Generals start to talk when they know all the perfumed Princesses at the Pentagon are going along with Rumsfeld!
749774
A better question is:  why didn't Rumsfeld resign earlier?
401464
The generals calling for the resignation of Rumsfeld have spent their lives in the service of our country.  They understand war; when to consider war; the objectives of war; the acceptable conclusion of war; the exit strategy of war.  None of these criteria have been met with this administration.  What we have with Bush and Rumsfeld is a loose cannon mentality.  \nOf any of the three axis of evil candidates to attack, Iraq was the least of a threat.  Do we really care that Saddam was a cruel and ruthless leader?  Hell, they're all over the world, and to some we send foreign aid. So here we are with our troops distracted in a no win situation in Iraq,  our resources for war pretty well drained because of three or four years of battle, and these guys are ready to go it again.  I don't get it, and neither do they.  I do understand one thing, these guys shoot from the hip.  They have no game plan, and they sure the hell have no exit strategy for the battle in Iraq or any subsequent battles.\n\nPerhaps they need to read up a little more about the downfall of the Third Reich, and particularly Adolf Hitler. Old Adolph had a penchant for ignoring his generals, too! Look what happen to him.
770131
The Game of the Generals is who is on top but the top had already changed.  Thus, they are in a precarious position now because the Democrats are now in control of the military positioning according to promotions, movements and budget.
754855
lol @ title of question.\n\nI think the timing means that Rumsfeld was an election casualty in a year when support for the Iraq war was a driving issue.  \n\nHe was "behind it" so, getting rid of him "should" fix our iraq "problem", right?  Who's with me?\n\nAnybody?  \n\nHello?\n\nCome on!
967097
I would say it's too late.  He's said so many times that he's happy with Rummy's performance, even after Abu Ghraib and every other f*** up.  It would seem hypocritical for him to suddenly change his mind now.  It would seem like he's trying to toss deck chairs off the Titanic.  It won't make a difference.  That ship's going DOWN.
568094
Doubtful. Gen. Powell resigned because of her husband.