if all of a cricket team are out first ball wich number batsman would remain not out?
953406
no8 it would go 1,3,4,5,6,7 change of ends 2,8,9,10,11, leaving no8 not having faced a ball
961588
Keep it all red for the red-ball. And all-white for the white ball. The umpire wouldn't notice the edges to the keeper.\n\nPS: You already have a sponsorship deal for your bat?
234645
Depends.  What I feel England lack is a world class spin bowler.  If the wickets are such that out seam/swing attck is favoured I would give us a very good chance against anyone.  If the wicket turns sharply later and doesn't offer much to the quicks early then we will struggle.
334743
Easy....the batsman 1 hits the first of the 2 balls and runs a single......the throw to run out at the keepers end misses the stump and hits the cap/helmet ( not worn) of one of the fielders/wicketkeeper. thats 5 runs so total scored on the ball is 6(1+5) and the strike changed as they took a single. \nthe last ball is hit for a six when 1 run was needed.\n\nboth scored centuries.and i get 10 points
119997
A super-sub in the cricket is a 12th man who can be brought in at the place of any one player in the playing XI. However there is a catch. If you get in a player in place of a batsman who is already out, the super-sub can only field or bat. and if you get a super-sub in place of a bowler, he can bowl only the number of overs that are remaining in the replaced players qouta. \nSo ideally, you replace a bowler with a batsman after he finished his 10 overs when bowling first so that you have an extra batsman when chasing or a batsmen when he is out, with a bowler when batting first so that you have an extra bowler in second innings.\nHope I was clear enough.
884787
Convince Ricky Ponting, Shane Warne, Glen McGrath, Mike Hussey, to come and play for you. Otherwise, it doesn't matter what you do, you will lose. Sorry.
725908
In ODI'S, It's best to send your best players in first,so they have a better chance of playing more deliveries.!I don't see how that would help the team sending Tendulkar in at 3 or 4.????
336432
No one alone can take the thophy for their team.. u can say this about a match but not for a whole series.. for winning the world cup or any other series the team should have to play as a team unit .. from 11 players 1 or 2 players always make a difference in team winning.. but not a particular one in all matches :D
865960
I think that they may play both Monty and Gilo at Brisbane. Monty is very tight and doesn't give much away. Gilo has a bit of a hex on one or two of the Aussies and never lets us down in the field or with the bat. Together they could be very effective. So my team would be (in batting order) : Bell, Strauss, Cook, Pietersen, Trescothick, Flintoff, Jones (wk), Giles, Hoggard, Harmison, Panesar. Obviously Freddie has to be 100% fit as he would carry a big bowling load. It's a cautious side - but I'll sett;e for a draw at the Gabba.
880184
If it is judged a no-ball due to above waist factor, he can't be given out. Even if it hits the stumps. He neither can be LBW, caught, stumped etc.
429529
Wow, so many answers and none of them correct, no one has answered how to win a match by zero wickets.  \n\nIn the example given a couple previous answers are correct, the run would count, the wicket would not count, the batting team would win by 1 wicket.  Lords holds the laws of cricket.  \n\nLaw 24 (no balls) states:\n12. Penalty for a No ball\n"A penalty of one run shall be awarded instantly on the call of No ball. Unless the call is revoked, this penalty shall stand even if a batsman is dismissed. It shall be in addition to any other runs scored, any boundary allowance and any other penalties awarded."\n\nAnd under law 25 (wide ball)\n"5. Penalty for a Wide\nA penalty of one run shall be awarded instantly on the call of Wide ball. Unless the call is revoked (see 3 above), this penalty shall stand even if a batsman is dismissed, and shall be in addition to any other runs scored, any boundary allowance and any other penalties awarded."\n\nNow as to whether the wicket would count.  Law 21 (The Result) states:\n"6. Winning hit or extras\n(a) As soon as a result is reached, as defined in 1, 2, 3 or 4 above, the match is at an end. Nothing that happens thereafter, except as in Law 42.17(b) (Penalty runs), shall be regarded as part of it. Note also 9 below."\n\nTherefore the wide or no-ball would count but the wicket would not as it came after the result.  Similarly if a batsman is on 98 and the scores are tied they need a boundary to get to 100, they cannot run 2 as the result is reached after the first run.\n\nThe only way a team can win with zero wickets is also covered by law 21:\n"7. Statement of result\nIf the side batting last wins the match without losing all its wickets, the result shall be stated as a win by the number of wickets still then to fall.\nIf the side batting last has lost all its wickets but, as the result of an award of 5 penalty runs at the end of the match, has scored a total of runs in excess of the total scored by the opposing side, the result shall be stated as a win to that side by Penalty runs."\n\nPenalty runs are awarded due to unfair play.  There are only three instances where a fielding side can give away 5 penalty runs during an over: 1)  deliberate distraction or obstruction of the batsman second infringement.  However the wicket will not count so they will in fact win by 1 wicket.  2)  Fielder does damage to the pitch.  Afridi was guilty of this recently.  3)  Match ball condition is changed, plenty of instances of this happening.  \n\nAt the end of a match if a team has lost by less then 5 runs and they find TV footage of the fielding team damaging the pitch or changing the condition of the ball they could apply for a 5 run penalty to win the match.  This would have to be done before the umpires meet with the scorers at the conclusion of the match.  Once the umpires and scorers agree on the correctness of the scores the result cannot be changed.
538171
RAHUL IS IDEAL NO.3 BATSMAN.\n\nIF WE HAVE TO CHASE A BIG TOTAL MORE THAN 300, DHONI OR IRFAN CAN BE SENT.
817258
THE WHOLE LOT ie\n\nBCCI\nSELECTOR\nCOACH\nCAPTAIN\nPLAYERS\n\nMake a fresh selection for each but before that make a criteria for selection for each category.\n\nFor example DRAVID WILL MAKE 10 - 63 RUNS IN 108 BALL, It equivalent to 30 - 180 runs in 50 overs. Such players shall be kept for TEST and not for ODI.\n\nThen make\n\npayment proportional to performance\n\nIf TEAM does not win remove\n2 b'man\n2 ballr\n1 all roudr\n1 wkt kpr\n\nIf team does not win series remove\n\nBCCI\nSELECTOR\nCOACH\nCAPTAIN\n\nAND make selection of NEW TEAM.
974291
HARBHJAN SINGH ALONE IS ENOUGH.  YUVRAJ AND SEHWAG CAN BE UTILISED AS SECOND SPINNER IF REQUIRED.
859550
LOL! Not much point checking that wikipedia link when he 's just cut & pasted most of it!\n\n\nA briefer answer, based on the fact that you understand how limited overs cricket works:\n\n..Unlike one day cricket, both teams have TWO batting innings each. The only limit to when an ininings has to end is when the batting side lose their tenth wicket, although a captain can also call an early end to his side's innings if he believes his side has more than enough runs to place them in a very strong position (this is called "declaring") \n\n...The first objective of the team batting first is to score enough runs to make the match almost impossible for the fielding team to win. Remember, they can take as long as they wish to do this providing they have at least one wicket left. \n\n...The first objective of the team bowling first is to dismiss the batting side for as few runs as possible, as quickly as possibly.  \n\n..Once the bowling side have taken all 10 wickets, the batting side's first innings end, and the teams change over. Alternatively, if the batting side have such a big total that they think the bowling side will seriously struggle to match it, they can declare an end to their own innings.\n\n.. so, here's an example. Lets say Australia go on today to make 560 all out. England then bat and make 420 all out. This means Australia would have a lead of 140 runs on the first innings. Australia then have their second innings, and make 300 all out. They now have a lead of 440, so.. England must make 441 in their second innings to win the match OR avoid losing all their wickets to force a draw. \n\n...Bear in mind that although there is NO limit on the length of \na team's innings, there IS a time limit in the match..namely five days. So a team has to judge how to pace its two innings and the speed of its scoring.. too long, and it does not allow itself enough time to dismiss the opposition, making it easier for the opposition to play for a draw. Any team which finds itself in a position where a win becomes unlikely ( like England at the moment !) will always try to avoid defeat by playing defensively for a draw.\n\nThats as simple as I can make it!
726191
...itz almost near, but you see\n\n3 specialist all rounders (excluding Ganguly)\n7 specialist batsmen (including Dhoni)\n6 specialist bowlers\n\nSo we have 9 specialists + 3 optional bowlers in your side and \n7 specialist + 3 optional (all rounders) are there...So why can't you drop 1 or 2 from the bowler's list and prefer batsman..?\nSince JPYadav has got chance earlier, I prefer jogindersingh among the all rounders...\n\nSo my  decision will be including Laxman (if Raina is not clicking again) & Dinesh Karthick - \ninstead of JPYadav & AAgarkar.\n\nIf you still need one bowler, either YMahesh or VRV Singh can be brought alongwith Laxman.
839344
In an over of 6 balls no runs scroed by the batsman or by extras is called "maiden" over. First century by a batsman is "maiden" century. First wicket for a bowler is "maiden" wicket.