Did Confucious say......?
966576
No he spoke Mandarin.
407094
"What if I can"     Stop using quotation marks to define the context of a thought?         \n\n"I will" being a question to yourself?????????????????\n\nRev. Steven\n\n   Surely you have more of an intellect than this shows, but more,,,, Hopefully you realize, the rest of us do!!!
204890
try this site,its there:\nhttp://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Confucius
1120093
*LOL* no!!!\n\nhttp://www.chinatownconnection.com/chinese-superstitions.htm  <<< Chinese Superstitions
137586
Yeah, there was once when I was talking to this guy and he was speaking Chinese to me (coz' I look like a bit of Chinese myself) but I on the other hand wasn't really good in Chinese, and didn't exactly understood everything that he was saying. The worst part was, I simply played along with it - nodding all the while at what he was saying about the stuff I was interested in buying.\n\nWhen I finally made my decision, he took out the merchandise and was at the counter when he told me the amount of money that I needed to pay. Suffice to say, I was clueless and I was like: "Huh?" He simply repeated it in Chinese again, until I finally said: "I'm sorry I don't understand Chinese." He then told me the amount... in English...\n\nI never went back to that shop again though. I guess I'm just too embarassed to go back there and pretend that I can speak really good Chinese... =p
926036
Absolutly not.  Who told you this?
919140
No.  Though, I'm sure some people think God talked to them.  The brain will fill in whatever voice you want to hear if you really want to hear something badly enough.
922483
confeuzdus  Is this your story?\n※※※ http://www.osoq.com/funstuff/extra/extra02.asp?strName=confeuzdus
1075457
what did you just say?
707668
No, Roran said it...I think...do you know the answer?
188253
he actually said that?!?!?!noooo!!!your kidding rite? and YOU didnt KNOW what to SAY??!?!?!gasp!
1100311
Its an argument against AI.\n\nIn simplcity it is saying understanding does not come from memorizing.  Another way to put it is that grammar does not come from vocabulary.  If you learn all the words, doesn't imply you know WHAT someone "means".\n\nHow does this pertain to intelligence? Glad you asked.\n\nSuppose that, many years from now, we have constructed a computer which behaves as if it understands Chinese. In other words, the computer takes Chinese characters as input, consults a large look-up table (as all computers can be described as doing), and then produces other Chinese characters as output. Suppose that this computer performs this task so convincingly that it easily passes the Turing test. In other words, it convinces a human Chinese speaker that it is a Chinese speaker. All the questions the human asks are responded to appropriately, such that the Chinese speaker is convinced that he or she is talking to another Chinese speaker. The conclusion proponents of strong AI would like to draw is that the computer understands Chinese, just as the person does.\n\nNow, Searle asks us to suppose that he is sitting inside the computer. In other words, he is in a small room in which he receives Chinese characters, looks them up on look-up table, and returns the Chinese characters that are indicated by the table. Searle notes, of course, that he doesn't understand a word of Chinese. Furthermore, his lack of understanding goes to show, he argues, that computers don't understand Chinese either, because they are in the same situation as he is. They are mindless manipulators of symbols, just as he is - and they don't understand what they're 'saying', just as he doesn't.
18527
There's actually an answer to this question, the problem is, it doesn't translate into English. The answer is "Mu" (in Japanese,  Wú orMou in Chinese). It's used as a response to certain koans and other questions in Zen Buddhism, intending to indicate that the question itself was wrong.
372514
Vivian:\n不要飢不擇食好嗎?你很好笑耶!
536391
Did you mean Confirmation?
903246
Hogen, a Chinese Zen teacher, lived alone in a small temple in the country. One day four traveling monks appeared and asked if they might make a fire in his yard to warm themselves.\n\nWhile they were building the fire, Hogen heard them arguing about subjectivity and objectivity. He joined them and said: "There is a big stone. Do you consider it to be inside or outside your mind?"\n\nOne of the monks replied: "From the Buddhist viewpoint everything is an objectification of mind, so I would say that the stone is inside my mind."\n\n"Your head must feel very heavy," observed Hogen, "if you are carrying around a stone like that in your mind."
307744
I think he was the one that said... "I think, therefore I am." He questioned everything like everyone does today and boiled down the one thing he could know... he was able to think and moved on from there. It is actually a very powerful statement to become self aware to the fact that we are thinking beings. Once we consider our own thoughts and how to control the path of our thinking, we are able to achieve monumental movements forward in our own personal development. It's like you take control of the bus you thought someone else was driving. \n\nThere is a joke that went like this... Rousseou was on an airplane the other day and was offered a drink by the steward... he said, "I think not!" and vanished.