How Many Al Qaeda Attacks Were There On U.S. Interests Around The World Before G.W. Bush Became President?
955244
first off its not just Al Qaeda its all extremists not just them.  and to answer your question.\n\nFrom 1894 to 1896 Abdul Hamid, Sultan of the Ottoman Empire, killed 150,000 Armenian Christians.\n\nIn India, Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur along with his disciples was burned to death by the Moghul ruler Aurangzeb in 1675.\nAnother Sikh, Bhai Mati Das was sawn into right and left halves while he was still alive.\n\nFrom 1843 to 1846 10,000 Assyrian Christians including women and children were massacred by the Muslims.\nFrom 1915 to 1918 750,000 Assyrians were killed in the name of Islamic Jihad.\nIn 1933 thousands of Assyrian villagers were murdered by the Iraqi soldiers in Northern Iraq.\nOver 30,000 Mauritanians have been killed by the Islamic dictators since 1960.\nIn July 1974, 4,000 Christians living in Cyprus were killed by Fahri Koroturk, president of Turkey and his Islamic army.\nOver 280,000 Ugandans killed during the reign of Idi Amin from 1971 to 1979.\nGenocide committed in the name of Allah: 3,000,000 Bangladeshi Hindus Killed during the Pakistan-Bangladesh war in 1971.\nIn 1980, 20,000 Syrians were murdered under the rule of Hafez Al-Assad, President of Syria.\nSince 1990 more than 10,000 Kashmiri Hindus have been brutally murdered by Islamic fundamentalists.\nSince 1992 120,000 Algerians have been murdered by the Islamic fundamentalist army.\nonce you realize that all muslims are capable of this, then you'll know what must be done.\nIt is not the terrorists that have hijacked Islam, rather it it is ISLAM that has hijacked the arab world.\n******************************...\n<>The following are muslim attacks against free nations\nor what they call, "the Infidels."\n\n1972 Munich Olympics Sep-5,1972 (Black September)\n1976 Entebbe Hostage Crisis, June 27, 1976\n1979 Iran Hostage Crisis, Nov. 4, 1979 444 days\n1979 Grand Mosque Seizure, Nov 20,1979\n1981 Assassination of Egyptian President, Oct 6,1981\n1981 Attempted Assassination of Pope John Paul the Second\n1982 Assassination of Lebanese Prime Minister, Sept 14, 1982\n1983 Bombing of US Embassy in Beirut, April 18,1983\n1983 Bombing of Marine Barracks, Beirut, Oct 23,1983\n1984 Hezbollah Restaurant Bombing, April 12,1984\n1985 Egyptian Airliner Hijacking, Nov 23,1985\n1985 Rome Airport murders\n1985 TWA Flight 847 hijacked, U.S. Navy diver murdered\n1985 Achille Lauro hijacking, Homicidal maniac lived in saddams Iraq\n1986 Aircraft Bombing in Greece, March 30, 1986\n1988 Pan Am 747 Flight 103 Bombing, Lockerbie, 100's murdered\n1988 Berlin Discotheque Bombing, Dec 21,1988\n1990 A Muslim Named El Sayyid Nosair Murders Israeli Political activist Meir Kahane. Nov 1990\n1992 Bombing in Israeli Embassy in Argentina, March 17,1992\n1993 Attempted Assassination of Pres. Bush Sr., April 14,1993\n1993 First World Trade Center bombing, February 26th, 7 Killed, Hundreds injured, Billions\n1994: A small bomb explodes on Philippine Airlines Flight 434, killing a Japanese businessman. It is later discovered that Ramzi Yousef planted a bomb on the aircraft to test a bomb for his terrorist plot.December 11, 1994\n1994 Air France Hijacking, Dec 24,1994\n1994 A Muslim Named Rashid Baz shoots at a van filled with Hasidic boys, on the Brooklyn bridge murdering one of them. FBI calls it "Road Rage". March 1, 1994\n1995 Attack on US Diplomats in Pakistan, Mar 8,1995\n1995 Saudi Military Installation Attack, Nov 13, 1995\n1995 Kashmiri Hostage taking, July 4,1995\n1996 Khobar Towers attack\n1996 Sudanese Missionaries Kidnapping, Aug 17,1996\n1996 Paris Subway Explosion, Dec 3,1996\n1997 At Empire State Building; Ali Abu Kamal shoots at tourists, kills one and wounds six before killing himself, Mayor Giuliani informs the public "he had many enemies in his mind".Feb 24,1997\n1997 Israeli Shopping Mall Bombing, Sept 4, 1997\n1997 Yemeni Kidnappings, Oct 30,1997\n1998 Somali Hostage taking crisis, April 15,1998\n1998 U.S. Embassy Bombing in Peru, Jan 15,
438888
you didn't mention where,whether in WTC,or in some other places .\n\nyour second answers is there is no exact clue about how many people died over there,only you will get a approx figure.
455851
world domination, Bush Administration
23944
Its been happening for ages, Gangus Con, Julius Cesar,Adolf Hittler, and now George Bush. Its the never ending struggle for Power. What seperates Bush from all the others is that they didnt try to mask there intensions. Just about every SuperPower in history lasted about 100 years before there fall. As I see it, the U.S. has been the "Big Boy on the block for at least that long give or take a decade. If history repeats itself as in the past, were due to take a fall. Sooner or later, all Bullys fall.
1105166
It's the truth. Our occupation in Iraq increased the likelihood of terrorism around the world. The threat levels at home will increase greatly as well, all thanks to Bush!
940874
The first one to come to mind is the first president Bush.  If I remember right he went from above 90% after the Gulf war to under 30% a year later.
262471
There is no doubt that much more happen that day, which government is not telling us. If we recall that it was the time when the polls for president Bush were going down. But right after the attack the rating went up! so something did happen. Now the file is closed we will never get the true answer. Anybody who will raise the question will be labeled terrorist and unpatriotic.
1092262
America has not "attacked" those countries, by themselves, out of a whim.  They are backed by the United Nations and many other countries have helped in the effort to decrease terrorism.
686123
Bush has declared war on america a long time ago...
27590
1. Who made 9/11 attacks:\na. Physically "Al Qaeda", practically we (US) have some blame on our selves because our middle-eastern policy is very biased towards Israel and we supported dictatorial regimes for a loooong time.\n\nb. Is it a political deceit: Yes & No. \nNo because the attacks did happen and because in 99.99% Al Qaeda was responsible. \nYes because, the US government plays the fear to launch its own geostrategic interests on the name of fighting terrorism. By the same token the British could have labeled the Boston Tea party as American terrorists.\n\n2. No one has ever the complete answer except the ones that did it. B. Laden admitted that he organized it.\n\n3. The only thing you can rely from a politician is that you can not rely on them. Some say politics is the art of the marrying the ideal with the feasible.\n\n4. Catching Saddam was much easier. Saddam does not have an international underground network.\n\n5. The Taleban where Stationary targets and did not launch a guerilla warfare. No member of Al Qaeda walks with an "Al-Qaeda member" stamp on his forehead. They blend with the local population that sometimes is supportive.\n\n6. Guerilla war is much more difficult than Desert Storm. The Iraqi army was sitting ducks. \n\n7.
620781
where have you been the last 5 years? remember the date 9/11? do you really beilieve planned attack? the why didn't President Bush do another attack when his poll numbers fell.mean his poll numbers were highest after the first attack. if he was willing to do it once then why not again.
795771
9/11 was being planned 10 years before Bush and Chaney were in the White House!  U.S. targets were hit 8 times by Islamic terrorists while Clinton was in office. I guess that was Bush's fault too?  You are a complete idiot!
73408
The threat of terrorism around the world will probably never go away although it has decreased.  The terrorist attack on World Trade Towers happened at a time when the U.S. was niave to the fact that there are people in the world that hate us, and we were unprepared for an attack of this magnitude.  Thanks to President Bush, we are on alert, and terrorist activities have pretty much ceased in the U.S.A.
532137
From the UK perspective, Bush is pretty much universally loathed over here, and most English people don't agree at all with his 'war on terrorism'. (or not how he's going about it anyway). \nBut then Bin Laden is a psychopath pure and simple, so we don't really care much for him either!
713175
The Bush Administration hasn't taken responsibility for a damned thing. They blame Clinton for the present and their opposers for the future. Another terrorist attack would see the current president's approval soar. Hell, without 9/11 Bush might have lost the election, hmmm
1150613
Al Qaeda\n\nGuys like him turn the world against America like you wouldn't believe
161345
Here are a few of many:\n\nBUSH:In 1945, there were about two dozen lonely democracies in the world. Today, there are 122. And we're writing a new chapter in the story of self-government -- with women lining up to vote in Afghanistan, and millions of Iraqis marking their liberty with purple ink, and men and women from Lebanon to Egypt debating the rights of individuals and the necessity of freedom. At the start of 2006, more than half the people of our world live in democratic nations.\nMY RESPONSE:The Bush administration has way too much faith in elections as a measure of democracy.  Any country can hold elections - if there are still deep underlying problems in the country, radicals will end up winning and taking the country on a decidedly un-democratic path. Just look at the one recently held election Bush DIDN'T mention - Iran, where Hamas just took power.\n\nBUSH:It is said that prior to the attacks of September the 11th, our government failed to connect the dots of the conspiracy. We now know that two of the hijackers in the United States placed telephone calls to al Qaeda operatives overseas. But we did not know about their plans until it was too late. So to prevent another attack –- based on authority given to me by the Constitution and by statute -- I have authorized a terrorist surveillance program to aggressively pursue the international communications of suspected al Qaeda operatives and affiliates to and from America. Previous Presidents have used the same constitutional authority I have, and federal courts have approved the use of that authority. Appropriate members of Congress have been kept informed. The terrorist surveillance program has helped prevent terrorist attacks. It remains essential to the security of America. If there are people inside our country who are talking with al Qaeda, we want to know about it, because we will not sit back and wait to be hit again.\nMY RESPONSE:I'm not sure which previous president he's talking about, but I do know this: I have no problem with the government monitoring domestic conversations with Al Qaeda.  However, I would prefer them to take the LEGAL option, which only requires them to file a warrant within 48 hours AFTER the tap has taken place.  The agency in charge of approving warrants approves almost ALL of them - so if the requests are legit, why not work within the system. Also, according to the "appropriate members of Congress", they never WERE properly informed, which is illegal.\n\nBUSH:Protectionists want to escape competition, pretending that we can keep our high standard of living while walling off our economy. Others say that the government needs to take a larger role in directing the economy, centralizing more power in Washington and increasing taxes. We hear claims that immigrants are somehow bad for the economy -- even though this economy could not function without them. (Applause.) All these are forms of economic retreat, and they lead in the same direction -- toward a stagnant and second-rate economy.\nMY RESPONSE:I'm no economist, but protectionism has had a history of working very well in the past when used correctly.\n\nBUSH:Keeping America competitive begins with keeping our economy growing. And our economy grows when Americans have more of their own money to spend, save, and invest.\nMY RESPONSE:Which is why, when Bush took office, we have a huge surplus, and now we have a deficit?\n\nBUSH:This year my budget will cut it again, and reduce or eliminate more than 140 programs that are performing poorly or not fulfilling essential priorities.\nMY RESPONSE:A lot of these programs are important - if they're failing to take care of essential things, they shouldn't be cut - they should be revamped.  I'm willing to pay a little extra for it.\n\nBUSH:And we can tackle this problem together, if you pass the line-item veto. (Applause.) \nMY RESPONSE:The line-item veto borders on un-constitutional.\n\nBUSH:Congress d