What does Cv Abstract Of Judgment Issued mean?
967946
It means that the court issued an Abstract of Judgment.\n\n  abstract of judgment\nn. a written summary of a judgment which states how much money the losing party owes to the person who won the lawsuit (judgment creditor), the rate of interest to be paid on the judgment amount, court costs, and any specific orders that the losing party (judgment debtor) must obey, which abstract is acknowledged and stamped so that it can be recorded at the county recorder. The purpose of an abstract of judgment is to create a public record and create a lien or claim if necessary on any real estate owned or later acquired by the loser located in the county in which the abstract of judgment is recorded. If the loser does not pay the judgment voluntarily then the winner can force a sheriff's sale of any property to collect. There are several problems: a) to find the county where the loser owns real estate; b) the probability that there are secured loans, tax liens and/or other judgments that come ahead of the judgment lien; c) the possibility that the loser/debtor may go bankrupt and avoid paying the debt.
795889
It means that certain courts have jurisdiction over certain types of cases.  For example, if you sue somebody for a car wreck and you want $50,000, the Circuit Ct or District Ct (Depending on State it might be called something different) has original jurisdiction and the Civil Appeals Court would have appellate Jurisdiction.  That case could not have been brought in the Civil Appeals Court to begin with.  That is the easiest way to explain it, but it can be more complicated than that.
794193
Your post is unclear.  If service of a summons & complaint have been quashed; a new summon & copy of the original complaint & exhibits need only be served.    If your use of the term "quashed," means something else, then the answer changes depending on state law.
580587
A qualified report has noted certain shortcomings, as per the following definition from the American Heritage dictionary: "4. To modify, limit, or restrict, as by giving exceptions."\n\nAn unqualified opinion can only be issued when there are no material exceptions noted in the testing performed (such as a "scope limitation") or the results of testing.
1108927
It means that you may file a new suit on the same cause of action.\n\nYou may file a motion to reconsider the ruling.  This usually requires that you have new information that you did not at the time of your last hearing.\n\nYou may appeal the ruling to a higher court.  In an appeal you need to show that the judge had faulty legal reasoning.   They do not re-evaluate findings of facts on appeal.  You will need an attorney to do an appeal properly.
230163
No; not "officially", and [generally] juries rule on the "+" or "-" regarding ANY award after the civil case is heard; the amount [again, USUALLY] is directed by the jury; obviously, this can be less, eqal to, or more. \n\nHere comes the "circus" part. \n\nAs in all jury-based decisions, not only does appeal up to Supreme Court loom, but so does "directed verdict" by the judge; and there is no "recount" as in congress to overturn this as if it were a "veto"; thus, in effect, ultimately all plaintiffs, and defendants, are facing a "bench trial", since his/her honor can overturn the jury verdict- again, appeal is possible, but check the stats for "success" in all appellate courts, and "directed verdict" has a 10x "stronger hold" against appeal.\n\nWhich direction does the directed verdict go in a civil case? If the "burden of proof" of damages, primae faciae, was met, the some damages are usually approved by judge if jury so directs; specifically, when judge enunciates clearly that "this factor cannot be considered in approval of an award" but feels no other part of case caused an award, especially one "felt" large, or even larger than "requested", will be overturned and a directed verdict - even directed amount, is ordered; sometimes, even NO award, when a huge one has been awarded, against the plaintiff, as judge rules the instructions were ignored. \n\nGiven the power of "directed verdict" especially in civil court, I would want a lawyer who had a terrific "track record" in bench trials more than ANY "famous" criminal attorney; usually, a good attorney is skillful at "jury control and judge appeasement", but if your attorney has any hint of "pissing off judges", get another to represent you in court; another factor in the directed verdict, even if you have grounds for a solid appeal, how LONG can you "wait" for a wrongful death verdict? The pain must be awful, and our judicial system, especially when you are opposing the "bottomless money pit" of huge corporations i.e., insurance companies, often KNOW they can "wear you down" with continuances, motions, and avoid payment by "making you cave in" with time.\n\n\nGood luck and good verdict\n\njm
389192
A commonly used acronym in various industries meaning "Record of Decision"\n\nIt can be a report summarizing the results of the Remedial Investigation, Feasibility Study, and Risk Assessment(s). \n\nAn example of a Record of Decision can be a official record resulting from an Environmental Impact Statement. In this case, it will be a signed document representing the culmination of the federal environmental document review and approval process, and documenting project approval.\n\nRefer to first hyperlink for an example.
596110
The 11th circuit does not have information on cases that far back online. You would need to contact the clerk there to request a copy of the ruling.
882267
11.0 GENERAL PROVISION \n\n(a) Assignment of Judges.\n\n(1) Appellate Division. Four judges are assigned to the Appellate Division by the Chairperson of the Judicial Council. The Appellate Division is in Room 607 in the Central District. \n\n(2) Department 70. Each judge assigned to the Appellate Division is also assigned to Department 70 of the Central District, Room 607. The Judges in Department 70 are assigned on a rotating basis and to be heard by one judge, petitions for writ of habeas corpus that are filed in conjunction with an appeal pending in the Appellate Division. The assigned judge's decision is dispositive of the petition for writ of habeas corpus. \n\n(Rule 11.0(a) amended and effective 7/1/2001.) \n\n(b) Appellate Jurisdiction. \n\n(1) The Appellate Division of the Superior Court has jurisdiction over all appeals arising from all misdemeanor, infraction and limited civil cases in Los Angeles County (except small claims appeals) and over all motions and petitions for stay orders in connection with such appeals. (Code Civ. Proc., § 77(e).) \n\n(Rule 11.0(b)(1) amended and effective 7/1/2001.) \n\n(2) Decisions. A panel of three judges participate in each matter before the court. The concurrence of at least two judges is required for a decision in any case. (Code Civ. Proc., § 77(a),(b) and (d).) \n\n(c) Writ Jurisdiction. \n\n(1) The Appellate Division has jurisdiction over all petitions for writs of mandate, prohibition and review (certiorari) in any misdemeanor, infraction or limited civil case. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1068(b), 1085(b) and 1103(b).) \n\n(2) Decision. A panel of three judges participate in each petition for writs of mandate, prohibition and review (certiorari) in any misdemeanor, infraction or limited civil case. The concurrence of at least two judges is required for a decision in any petition for a writ. (Code Civ. Proc. § 77(a),(b) and(d).) \n\n(Rule 11.0(c)(1)&(2) amended and effective 7/1/2001.) \n\n(Rule 11.0 [1/1/95] amended and effective 7/1/2001.)
460081
It is the standard of review of administrative decisions.  The executive branch may interpret and enforce the law and make such administrative determinations as are required o long as they are not arbitrary nor capricious.\n\nIt's a pretty difficult standard to prove.  The decision  made must be entirely unsupportable by the facts.  If, let's say, the Department of Health closes down your restaurant because they think there's a rat infestation ut it turns out that no health inspector ever even visited the restaurant, that would be arbitrary and capricious.  BUT, if a health inspector would have found a rat infestation if he had inspected even though he never did, the decision is not arbitrary or capricious and is enforceable.\n\nIn general, if the administrator is drunk or high or too stupid to breathe but accidentally stumbles and falls onto a decision that a rational person might have made, the decision will stand.
212122
This is to inform candidate, with the roll no:205001, that the candidate's degree exam result might be witheld by the Calicut University, in Kerala, India - because the candidate does not even know to use capital letters where they are definitely required.\nThe candidate may, however, submit a suitable explanation, duly supported by testimonials from reputable educationists and/or qualified psychiatrists - and seek favour of the result's release.
676400
My guess would be the more recent document unless the will violates a court order. The best determination would be made by a lawyer.
251398
a default judgment is entered.  if you are not there to contest it, and the ruling is against you, you waive all rights to future contesting it and are absolutely stuck with the ruling...a bad idea unless you are guilty as sin and are prepared for the consequences.
648693
It depends on which court handled the case. If it is the U.S. Supreme Court, go to the website; http://www.supremecourtus.gov/ and click on the the docket link and enterin your search criteria. Good luck.
500654
Don't worry about the statute of limitations. You have already won the lawsuit and the statute of limitations to collect the judgment will be a long time.\nThe type of supplemental hearing is described in sec 2-1420 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure. It allows you to bring the person back to Court and ask them what they have and where they have it.\nThen you get a writ of attachment or a writ of garnishment to collect property from the places (like banks and employers) that you found have property belonging to the person.
159662
1. Panel of 9 judges\n2. Rulings based on a mojarity opinion rather than legal precedent\n3. Decision is final. No appeal possible.
568617
Why on Earth do people answer these questions when they have no idea what they're talking about?  Sandytoes, asking a court clerk will do no good.  They are not permitted to give legal advice.\n\nThat having been said, why don't you give us some more details about the judgement.  What was it for?  When was it perfected?  Why do you say that it is expired.  What state do you live in?\n\nIn California, for instance, judgements expire after 10 years.  If the judgment has expired, it is probably not affecting your credit whatsoever.  \n\nThe only way to actually get it off your credit report is to petition the court to have it expunged.  Chances are real slim on that.  Otherwise, you're probably just going to have to deal with it being there.