Are CAT scores for 11 year olds reliable?
921927
Any testing is good I feel.  i was not good at tests but maybe if i got them regular in primary school I may have not been too concerned about them.\n\nI did not like secondary school, it was a waste of time.  If you want your child to have a good education then get a tutor or send them to a private school.\n\nWhy oh why did I get country dancing, basketball, indoor hockey for Physical Education in Glasgow.  Nobody in the history of the school has ever became a professional at any of these disciplines.\n\nIn addition music class.  No professional musicians either.  We did have a couple of footballers.  One of which Andy Gray however when I was there, the teachers had a pay dispute and no school team cos they didn't get paid enough overtime. \n\nI wonder if at their interview they made that clear to the panel the the children's development meant nothing when money was involved.
849499
I recomend trying several wieght ratios and see what is comrotable for the 11 year old. If you have a compound this should be easy by just adjusting the draw weight. The minimum is 40 lbs in Illinois as well. The youngster may also have to atend a hunter safety course.
671902
20 years\n\n4 scores and 7 years ago = 87 years
958850
I just consulted my 11-year-old daughter.  She says 11.
595322
166 really?? I would think you could figure it out. LOL\n\ntop score 300. average 110-115, genius (top 2 %) 130+\n\nIt was estimated that Marilyn Vos Savants IQ was 230. but when IQ gets very high it is impossible to tell. There actually is not top score but it is estimated that it is almost beyond improbability for a homo sapiens to score higher than 300 and not be another species.\n\nPart of the measuring problem is ceiling bump. i.e. how does a person with an IQ of 135 design a test to quantify the IQ of someone with and IQ of 200 or 250.\n\nWith an IQ of 166 one thing that you Will notice. People that have IQ of less than say 120 will notice that you are smart but not be able to discern how smart. People that are over 135 can discern the difference between two people one with say an IQ of 145 an another with an IQ of 165.
1111664
For a 40-44 year old male:\n\n<18 - excellent\n18.1 ~ 21 - very good\n21.1 ~ 24 - good\n24.1 ~ 27 - fair\n>27 - poor
358518
Probably around 10 or 11 years old.
1044709
why,you must be about 11
976657
Not old enough for the real thing. My score at Duke that was for preperation and guaging was a 1580. I took it before the 2400 scale was implimented. IQ is 178. My ratio IQ is higher. EQ is 113. IQ was professional and EQ was online.\nOddly enough, almost all the questions I answer have something to do with IQ.
906504
Sure it is worth it if you are interested in that sort of thing and find it entertaining.  If you want to know where your score fits, the range of 85 to 115 is considered low average to  high average.  Obviously, higher than that is above average.  Over 130 is considered superior.  Keep in mind that any IQ test you do on line is not the same as a real IQ test.  The on  line tests tend to score higher.  \n\nThis link may help you.
886846
It depends on the age group. But probably not
882644
Probably age 11 or 12.
1141850
Online ones, no.  But if you are given the WISC or the Woodcock-Johnson IQ tests then they are fairly accurate.  You want to get a verbal score and a performance score and then the full scale IQ score.\nNow if English is not the first language, the test results may be skewed as well.
511324
but it doesn't work. maybe you should try www.thepenismighty.com instead. andrew H below you are a moron if you are clicking random links with an 11 year old...
145779
The Conners’ Rating Scales are a result of 30 years of research on childhood and adolescent psychopathology and problem behavior. It is used as an assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents. The Conners’ Rating Scales-Revised evaluate problem behaviors as reported by the teacher, parents (or alternative caregivers), and adolescents.Normative data for the revised forms comes from a large community-based sample of children and adolescents collected throughout the United States and Canada. Norms are available for children and adolescents aged 3 to 17 on the parent and teacher rating forms; norms are available for adolescents aged 12 to 17 on the self-report forms.\n\nBecause these are children under the age of 18 taking the test, the parents are giving their authorization for the test results to be used.\n\nThere are some case studies on the subject at the following links:\n\nhttp://continuingedcourses.net/active/courses/course004.php?PHPSESSID=5e3250ec4bfaccabc347ea79583440db\n\nhttp://www.purdue.edu/ODOS/adpro/add.htm
767997
1. Any halfway accurate IQ test you take would factor in your age when calculating the score, so a 13 year old who gets less questions right than a 25 year old might still get the same score.\n\n2. Most IQ tests you find on the internet are total crap, and furthermore, that Tickle IQ test gives you your score based on the performance of everyone who's taken the test, which includes people who cheated on it, which makes it ridiculously inaccurate.\n\n3. Many IQ tests are flawed in the questions they choose to use. For example, questions about proverbs and other cultural items do not test your intelligence so much as the depth of your knowledge of American English, and a brilliant person from another culture will miss that question. A famous example of a flawed question is, "Which of these does not belong with the others? A. dog B. deer C. cow E. horse." Someone might say "A. dog" because the dog does not have hooves. Someone else might say "deer" because the deer is the only animal that is not domesticated. Someone else might say "cow" because the cow is the only one that's a source of food. Someone else might say "horse" because the horse is the only one you can ride on.\n\n4. IQ tests often do not account for the variety in kinds of intelligence. There are many kinds of intelligence, some recognized by American culture and some not recognized by American culture but recognized by other cultures. For example, there is social intelligence, creative intelligence, logical intelligence, etc. IQ tests generally look at four intelligence types, but totally miss many others.\n\n5. The original purpose and professional use of IQ tests is not to tell normal people how smart they are. IQ tests were originally designed to detect mental deficiencies. For example, a child with a particular disorder might fail a large number of questions related to logic, or a child with another disorder may miss the questions relating to spacial skills.\nOnline tests will do a sort of reverse of this- telling you that your strong point is your spacial reasoning or something. It's not quite so bad as just spitting out a score, but it still is not what that kind of test is best used for.\n\n6. Once again, these things are as unreliable as all ****!\n\nSome geniuses might get a 260 on these tests. But, some geniuses might get a 95. There are many kinds of intelligence, and no IQ test- especially no free IQ test you find on the internet- can really tell you how smart you are. Your intelligence is something you have to discover by yourself, by coming up with the right way to go about things and getting the results you expect.
1108421
720 is considered good score and above\n\n\nLC