Is a convicted child molester prohibited from being in the presence of a pregnant woman?
915868
If not, he/she should be. Take it a step further...just prohibit them from being...period.
455096
The key age is 16.\n\n948.02 Sexual assault of a child.  \n\n(1) First degree sexual assault.  Whoever has sexual contact or sexual intercourse with a person who has not attained the age of 13 years is guilty of a Class B felony.\n \n(2) Second degree sexual assault.  Whoever has sexual contact or sexual intercourse with a person who has not attained the age of 16 years is guilty of a Class C felony.\n \n(3) Failure to act.  A person responsible for the welfare of a child who has not attained the age of 16 years is guilty of a Class F felony if that person has knowledge that another person intends to have, is having or has had sexual intercourse or sexual contact with the child, is physically and emotionally capable of taking action which will prevent the intercourse or contact from taking place or being repeated, fails to take that action and the failure to act exposes the child to an unreasonable risk that intercourse or contact may occur between the child and the other person or facilitates the intercourse or contact that does occur between the child and the other person.\n\n(4) Marriage not a bar to prosecution.  A defendant shall not be presumed to be incapable of violating this section because of marriage to the complainant.\n \n(5) Death of victim.  This section applies whether a victim is dead or alive at the time of the sexual contact or sexual intercourse.
135656
The age of consent in Maryland is 16, so generally, the scenario you describe isn't illegal; however, there may be exclusions for a person "in a position of authority", particularly school employees.  Checking the statute now..\n\nUpdate:  There doesn't seem to be any exclusion for "position of authority"; however, under § 3-322, "Unnatural or perverted sexual practice", performing oral sex *IS* a crime in Maryland! "A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 10 years or a fine not exceeding $1,000 or both."\n\nNote that, as wrong as it sounds, under § 3-318, the 37yo woman/15yo boy situation is legal. "In general.- Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) of this section, a person may not be prosecuted under § 3-303, § 3-304, § 3-307, or § 3-308 of this subtitle for a crime against a victim who was the person's legal spouse at the time of the alleged rape or sexual offense. "
1048251
sure you can \nit your daughter\nyour daughter have moral and legal right to see papa\n\nif your off probation  then you can \nenjoy your family\noh by the way have you join \nhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/roar_4_freedom/  support group for sex offenders
553693
NO! This information should not be made available! It is unconstitutional and in the majority of cases it is ex post facto and due process of law is not followed. \n\nFurthermore, rehabilitated former sex offenders have a 5.3% recidivism for re arrest and 3.5% recidivism for re conviction. Out of that 3.5%, 1.2% are recidivists who offend a child. The registries are nothing but feel good, knee jerk legislation. They have not and will not save one child. Your child has a larger chance of being harmed by a drug dealer/user, drunk driver, playground accident, drowning and parental neglect than they have of being harmed by a rehabilitated former sex offender. \n\n90 to 95% of sex offenses are committed by someone known to the child in their family or the families circle of friends, as well as, coaches, teachers, police and other people in positions of authority. \n\nStranger danger is not prevalent. You are the only one that can protect your child. Parental Supervision while the children are out playing or while they are on the internet is paramount to their safety.
1051389
If the child is shielded from it, it will affect the child so much worse when it is exposed, where as if the child is raised around it the child will be acclimated and be in less shock, It is like alcohol in Europe. the kids can drink, and the have less alcoholism, the children see sex everywhere. They dont grow up to be rapist. That is a major problem in America. So there should be no filtering I believe.
814678
If the boy is under age and the father is a registered sex offender, he could be, based on the law where the boy is located.  Also, if his parole states that he must stay away from children, the answer is a definite yes, if the boy is underage.\n\nAnother issue is in the boy's mother got a restraining order against the father for herself or the boy or it is part of the divorce decree that he stay away from the mother or the boy.  If either is true, the answer is again, a definite yes.\n\nAs the boy is an adult, does the boy have a restraining order against the father?  Does the father's parole prohibit contact? \n\nThese are just a few issues that should be considered.  For a more exact answer, you would need to contact a lawyer.
865327
hmm good question.  Since it's not real children I'd wager a guess that it would have to be an already convicted pedophile to have it to be violating parole.\n\nPedophiles are the scum of the earth!
797906
I would say no.. and I've heard an argument (zealots don't attack me, I've not looked it up, only heard it) that in the bible a man kills a pregnant woman and his sin is killing the woman.. that is his only sin.. not for the death of the child inside her.. which would suggest that in the eyes of God a pregnant woman is one person.
929039
i was molested as a child and i say a child molester should have life probation, goverment keeping tabs on them wherever they go, and be placed in a mental instatiute(or however you spell it.) for rehabilatation, molesting kids is NOT normal, they are messed up. they should have mandatory instatiutionalistion for at least two years before they could go back into society on probation.
1168320
Yes. They let a child molester out because he was dying. Dr. Death shouldn't have been in prison in the first place. People should have the right to chose when they die.
1088943
Please go slap whoever told you that....if there is proof that the child (no matter what its age) is being abused in any way shape or form, both parents can be charged. even if only one is doin the molesting.
618513
Fortunately, I've never dealt with someone actively molesting a child in a religious organization/setting.  On the other hand, as a youth leader of an organization for teens, I actively watched and made decisions to help identify and protect the young people entrusted to me by their parents.  It's always best to try to avoid getting into the situations before they happen rather than dealing with the consequences afterwards.
174288
Yes i live in England and a few monthe ago their was  the trial of a man and woman accused and found guilty of the rape and commiting numerous sexual acts on a 12 week old baby there was even photographic evidence that these people had themselves took the sentences passed down were outragous he got 8 years and will be out in 4 and she got 4 and will be out in 2
998484
no, as a matter of fact it is illegal. he can go to jail for stat. rape
1019937
Why not! They molest without regard of the innocent child's life why the hell not!!!
100399
I am not an attorney, but as a parent I would hope so.  I also thought if a child sex offender was released part of the parole would be to limit or cease all contact with children.