plaintiff witholds facts from complaint hoping defendant perjurs himself in discovery?
915370
Hello,\n\nIs this a real case? I am sure this happens all the time, right? \nSo, only the defendants know the truth and better tell his/her attorney what is going on.\n\nThis complaint should be withdraw for filing a false claim.\n\nHope this helps you................................................   : - O
227330
You can be sued by that guy, however, if you told the truth, he should loose.  It might even be thrown out of court without a trial.  Most likely, he is bluffing and there will be not lawsuit.
672297
It doesnt matter, they have to do that, if they call them guilty, they can be sued for slander if he ends up being found innocent.  It can also taint witnesses that see the report, as it helps to establish guilt in their minds.
1076671
Impeding an investigation, harboring a criminal.
183143
Hopefully this reply does not reach you too late.\n\nYou should go to the Clerk of the Court for the county in which the action was filed.\n\nOne generally responds to an answer by either Affirming, Denying, or Stating one is Without Knowledge of each allegation set forth in the complaint. You would also raise any affirmative defenses at this point. If you are in Florida, for example, see the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure for more detail on this matter (the link is below), or see the corresponding Rules of Civil Procedure for whatever court and jurisdiction the action was filed in. \n\nDo not construe this as legal advice & don't rely upon it. You need to seek the counsel of a lawyer to get legal advice. This is just a general pointing you in a possible direction.\n\nYou can email me at theinkgroup912@yahoo.com if you'd like
1063666
The suspect is presumed innocent until proved guilty.
120868
If someone is dumb enough to brag on TV or in a blog that they download pirated music, then their statements can be used against them in court.  It would also be enough for prosecutors to get a search warrant to search the person's home and computer to gather additional evidence for possibly prosecution.  It would be enough evidence for the recording industry to file a lawsuit and make the same demands to inspect the ocmputer for further evidence.
497445
If it is said publicly, the offending person could be sued for slander.
1183679
"He who represents himself has a fool for a client."
775408
Not at this phase, although some digging may uncover it.\n\nif a real charge is to be filed, that person must appear
874107
It is not nearly so cut and dried as the previous answers would suggest.  In order to have the court order a confidential informant to come forward the defendant must show that without this individuals testimony or whatever they are not able to build an adequate defense.  That this person's information is critical to their receiving a fair trial and that this person has information or testimony that would benefit the defense's case.  in State of KS v. Freele they say:  \n\n1. The identity of a confidential informant is privileged unless the informant's identity has already been disclosed or disclosure is essential to assure a fair determination of the issues. In deciding whether to require disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant, a court must balance the public interest in protecting the flow of information to law enforcement officials against the defendant's right to prepare his or her defense.\n\n2. A "mere tipster" is an informant whose information precipitates an investigation. In contrast to the tipster, the informant who actually engages in or observes the criminal activity of the defendant is in a position to provide independent relevant evidence to the defense of the case. A mere tipster whose information precipitates an investigation is generally not subject to identity disclosure. \n \nThere are many different circumstances regarding informants, controlled buys, tips, search warrants, etc,  I am pretty well studied on this subject and I'd be happy to help you.  Contact me with some more information and I will see what I can find out for you.  And also be advised that even if you can prove that this informant lied to the police it is irrelevant based on the Good Faith Doctrine which states that as long as the police believed it and had no reason to suspect it a lie then everything is upheld and you're just screwed.  If this involves a search warrant you will need to request a Franks hearing.  Let me know if you would like my help.
721363
If the person actually took the stand during the trial and denied killing the person, then he could be charged with perjury.  If he didn't take the stand and get sworn in, it can't be said to be perjury.  He may get charged with obstructing justice, depending on what he has or hasn't said to the police.  If it is a federal crime and the FBI is involved, he could be charged with lying to federal agents.  Probably the worst case situation other than these things is that he could face a civil trial in the same way O J Simpson did and be facing a huge financial penalty...it is rather stupid for anyone to do that though.  Otherwise, unfortunately, double jeopardy will apply.  Even on an appeal, it can only be on the evidence presented, not on any new evidence.  If a higher court does decide to send it back to a lower court for a retrial, he could be in big trouble.  Hope this helps.
1071420
There's no way to answer this without knowing the nature of the claims (causes of action) you propose to assert in the class action.
566689
Not exactly sure what you're asking.  You or your attorney should be able to file a Motion for Discovery (of evidence) with the prosecutor or court.  This asks for written/recorded statements of confessions make by you to law enforcement, your criminal record.
399530
#hire an attorney #2  what does a phone prove.. or pictures.# the court wont be impressed with you, sister or friend. all three are expected to lie. not that u r.lying. who is this eye witness."?  take it to trial if he is innocent.. take a plea if he is not.
1073724
Depends on the circumstances - the burden of proof rests on the plaintiff.  If they can prove that you owe the money, for services rendered or whatever, then you need to prove why you don't.  A denial is not considered adequate, if the plaintiff has proven his case.
176968
If you merely say that he/she is innocent that would not be helpful. First obtain a copy of Charge Sheet.  Examine the paper evidences quoted therein.  If there is no eye-witness contest the charges giving supporting evidences. File your petition with the authorities of the competent jurisdiction.