I have just watched all 3 lord of the ring films today  and I am totally  confused,  which one shot J.R.?
917737
Did'nt you pay attention? It was the man with one arm.
1027895
The Lord of the Rings.
892148
Gosh I would have to vote like this:\n\n1. Lord of the rings trilogy (9.6)\n2. Harry Potter series (9.3)\n3. Godfather trilogy (9.1)\n4. Matrix trilogy (9.0)\n5. Jurassic park trilogy (8.9)\n6. Lethal weapon series (8.7)\n7. Star wars series (8.4)\n8. Back to the future trilogy (8.3)\n9. X--Men trilogy (8.2)\n10. Mission impossible trilogy (8.0)
1040267
The Lord Of the Rings!
520243
OMG! I finally finished watching all of them. I really liked the Goblet of Fire, but I think that was the 4th huh? I get them all mixed up. Then I would say 3rd one. They get better each time!
488055
I do not know whether you know of the great Indian epic Ramayana. Its a movie worth making. Whenever I read I think of the Lord of the Rings. Imagine when I say 3 parts of Lord of Rings would go into making just one part. It has all the emotions which we go as human beings undergo, Love, Betrayal, Revenge, Greed, Brotherhood, Ideal characters of man and woman. \nI think the best man to direct such a splendid epic would be none other than Mr. Peter Jackson (the director of Lord of the Rings and King Kong). As far as actors are concerned I cannot think of anyone right now who would fit for the lead role of Rama & Sita & Ravana. \nRama getting married to Sita, and goes to exile (because of her scheming step mother & helpless father) where she is kidnapped by Ravana. So Rama along with his brother Laxman starts looking for her. On the way, they come across troop of monkeys, whose king is thrown away by his brother, from his own kingdom. So Rama pledges support from him to look for Sita, at the same time promises to help him in winning back his kingdom. So he does help him in getting back the monkey king get his kingdom. After that the monkeys and Rama and Lakshman, start towards Lanka, where Ravan had kept Sita. But there is big ocean between Lanka and India, so there has to be a bridged forged and then a large army had to be moved. What follows then is a epic battle, where Rama ultimately kills Ravana and takes Sita back to his kingdom, Ayodhya. \nIts a great story and very touching. It should be made in 3 parts. Would be not only interesting but a lesson for today's young guys !!
197536
seen all 3 in theatres\n\nso many ways to go.....\n\nscary!
567142
I am absolutely totally in love with Lord of the Rings.  I have the books on tape and the Extended Edition of the Movies.  I also have all the books.\nHow can you not love Lord of the Rings?
774543
The third one was the best so far.  The director did an excellent job creating the dark and intensity of the story, and the story flowed together perfectly.  The others were too childish, Goblet of Fire was good but too rushed and crunched together.
867891
The movies were fairly similar to the books.  There were notable omissions...\n-Tom Bombadil...but the whole focus on him really does nothing to advance the story.  And for Hollywood, things that don't advance a story are usually not in the movie.\n-The Scouring of the Shire...an interesting chapter in the last book, but would have caused confusion in the movies.  The ring has already been destroyed at this point, which essentially "saves the world", so adding another "climax" to the movie would not have allowed the movie to flow properly.  Books can get away with stuff like that...movies not so much.  \n\nThere were also some notable changes.  For example, whereas the movie portrays Boramir dying in the first film, he actually doesn't die until the 2nd book (The Two Towers)...though it is towards the beginning.  Arwen is at best a minor character in the books. So when you see Arwen trying to save Frodo, the book character was actually Glorfindel...and it was Gandalf and Elrond who sent the flood of waters.  SHe is a very minor character in the actual story...only appearing four times and a romance between Aragorn and Arwen is only hinted at.  Arwen doesn't play a role in the books except for the Appendices in which her relationship with Aragorn is described.  Eowyn has more of a role than Arwen did...and in "The History of Middle Earth" it is revealed that Aragorn was supposed to marry her.  Her role in the books, however, are still minor.  \n\nIt's been said that the Tolkien family didn't approve of how Jackson made the story.  First of all, not all the Tolkien family was bothered by it.  J.R.R. Tolkien's grandson was in support of it.  J.R.R. Tolkien's son was not.  His son was not upset by the screenplays, just the fact that it was made into a movie.  He felt that it shouldn't be made into a movie.  Of course, that's inconsistent with the fact that there has been another, albeit animated, adaptation.  But J.R.R. Tolkien's son was very much like J.R.R. Tolkien himself...in that he didn't really like technology.  This is why the stories are very much against machines, etc...and you see those things destroying nature and a simple way of life.  It was Tolkien's beliefs and feelings reflecting into his writings.  \n\nAny nitpicky fan will tear the movies apart and point out its flaws.  But for the most part, the movies are pretty consistent with the books.  Nitpicky fans are going to one day have to realize that if everything was done exactly how the book was written, just one movie would last for HOURS.  And Jackson already was turned away by one movie company (Miramax) for simply wanting to makee three movies.
560886
Lord of the Rings (all excellent movies)\nIndiana Jones (the annoying kid from 'Temple of Doom' kept this trilogy from being #1 on my list)\nOriginal Star Wars (I like the kid from 'Temple of Doom' more than an Ewok)\nThe Godfather (3 was so unneccesary and Sofia Coppola stunk up the screen)\nX-Men (haven't seen 3 so it might move up cuz the first two were good)\nBack to the Future (Great first movie, last two stunk)\nStar Wars prequels (Bad stories, bad acting, bad movies)
1142857
None really.  The whole series kind of sucked.\n\nThe Hobbit was the best of all of them, but that's just b/c the name 'Bilbo Baggins' is fun to say.
804970
I am going to go with the most obvious one first:  \n1.The One Ring. The One Ring was the key to Sauron's power, when deprived of it, he became a spirit and went into hiding.  However, because the One Ring contained the power to "bind"  all the Rings of Power, unless the ring was destroyed, Middle Earth would never be safe.  The Ring seemed to have a mind of its own, and was always seeking a way back to its master.  In addition, to all the things that Sauron could do with the ring, it had the power of making its wearer invisible and prolonging their life.  \n\n2. Gandalf.  Gandalf was the best-known of the Maiar (servants of the Valar) of Valinor, a servant of the Valar (the same as Middle Earth's Angels), the Powers of the world, and of Eru Ilúvatar, the One (the same as Middle Earth's God). In Valinor he was known as Olórin, and was said to be the wisest of the Maiar. He dwelt in the gardens of Irmo and was the pupil of Nienna, the patron of mercy. When the Valar decided to send the order of the Wizards to Middle-earth in order to counsel and assist all those who opposed Sauron, Olórin was proposed by Manwë. In the Order, he had a strained, competitive relationship with Saruman, its head.  Gandalf was the last Istari to arrive in Middle-earth, landing in Mithlond around 1000 TA. He seemed the oldest and least wise of them, but Círdan the Shipwright felt that he was the greatest on the inside on their first meeting in the Havens, and gave him the Ring of Fire. Gandalf hid it well and it is not known until he leaves with the other ringbearers at the end of the Third Age that he and not Círdan was the third holder of the Elven-rings.\n\nAnd lastly my favorite character, I think.\n\n3.Galadriel. During the Second Age, when the Rings of Power were forged (Galadriel may have assisted in forging them).  Galadriel was mistrusting of Annatar, the loremaster who guided Celebrimbor and the other Noldor of Eregion. It later turned out that this mistrust was justified, as he was finally revealed to be Sauron, pretending to be an emissary from the Valar Aulë. When Eregion was attacked, Galadriel was entrusted with one of the Three Rings of the Elves. Her Ring was Nenya, the Ring of Water, which has been suggested to be the chief of the Three, although Vilya is said to be the most potent of the three elven rings. Conscious of Sauron's power, and wishing to thwart it, she did not use the Ring as long as the One Ring was in Sauron's hands. However, during the Third Age, when the One Ring was lost, she may have (she advised Celebrimor earlier that the three rings should never be used at all) put it to use. Its power might have been related to the Mirror of Galadriel, a large bowl of water in which visions of the past, present, and future could be seen. She may also have used it in the defence of Lórien and the ring may have assisted her in making Lórien a fair refuge for the Sindar. Galadriel maintained constant vigilance against Sauron and often strove with him in thought. Sauron is said to have greatly desired to see the mind of Galadriel, but so long as he did not have the one ring, it was impossible (In fact, it has been suggested that even if he did have the One Ring, he may not have been able to see the mind of Galadriel. During the Second Age, when Sauron had the One, the Keepers of the Three were able to hide their minds from Sauron by simply taking off their Ring.)  After Sauron perished, Celeborn led the Lórien host over the Anduin and captured Dol Guldur. Then, Galadriel came forth and "threw down its walls and laid bare its pits". To this point, and during all the Third Age of the World, Galadriel was considered the greatest of the Eldar. Accounts in The Silmarillion state her as being, algo, the greatest of the Eldalië, with Fëanor, though she was wiser than he.
989263
Lord of the 3??\n\nLord of the Rings was released in India (all three movies)\n\nNext, the big boxes of DVDs for the entire collection of Lord of the Rings might not be released in India because of slow sales or no sales.
570697
I thought the Balrog was neat. He wasn't that bad compared to some of the other stuff in LOTR. I think he's cool, though. Very nice whip, and he's all firey.
311727
i LOVE the lord of the rings movies. the battle for helm's deep was great! and chicken boy is a DORK
280297
Godzilla v. Kevin Costner.\n\nA rabid Rottweiler v. Kevin costner.\n\nThe entire Crips and Bloods gangs v. Kevin Costner.\n\nFollow me????