Mr G.W.Bush Junior,Why dont you help Sri Lanka war agiants Bloody LTTE terrorsist as Iraq is it because of oi?
930617
Dude, if you think Bush has the smarts to A. operate the internet and B. operate a keyboard/computer in the first place, much less C. read all those big words up there, you're being WAY too generous to his intelligence in the first place.\n\nThe truth is, he's a halfwit driven by religious superiority and consumerist greed. In other words, the worst possible person to be running our country. It wouldn't be so bad if he were INTELLIGENT and a religious fanatic and driven by consumerist greed, but... I've had pet fish that had more brains than that man.\n\nAnd imagine, he's what the American people chose. \n\nSays a LOT about our fool selves, doesn't it? \n\nDon't look at me, I was too young to vote for/against him. I'd've written in Mickey Mouse just to keep him from being elected. I know better than to put a retard in a position of extreme power.
973023
well apart from that excuse that saddam had weapons which could blast us brits, what other reason are we going there for? i doubt we're helping the iraqs. we're in it for the money and oil. \n\nnobody likes armed missonarys
614570
Our criminal leaders did not invade Iraq to "help" anyone but themselves.  They staged 9/11 to scare us into supporting whatever they decided to do.  Those of you who do not understand this, WAKE UP.
1074552
Becos Sri Lankan Goverment still having the right to Save the Life of the inocent people in North and east which ur calling as Eelam.\n\nSoviet situation was different than sri lankan because in ur Eelam there are lot of other people also living the fear of death by the people those who calling them the funder of Eelam
586911
Amnesy International is a less biased source than President Bush, that is for certian. It is amazing that our control of this country has resulted in the deaths of thousands of civilians and we have a hard time understanding why people are so upset. We did finance Saddam, as we have done other dictators. It doesn't make it our fault that he did this to his people. I think it is just really interesting that our stated reason for going over there is that he attacked us. When that wasn't true we changed it to weapons of mass destruction. Well... that wasn't true either. Now it is presented as spreading democrarcy... hmmm... if our goal was to protect people from corrupt governments and spread democracy we would be in a lot of other countries...and we would be assisting countries that are starving. Kind of blows that out of the water doesn't it. I respect our troops deeply, that they would put their lives and destiny's on the line for us and I feel sad and distressed that we are not even being honest about why we are ending their lives as well as thousands of civilian lives that we don't talk about in the so called "liberal" media.
1062224
Screw liberals!  The Bush administration has made big mistakes in Iraq but things are going to get better once:  Iraqi forces increase, the iraqi parliament works together, and when the Iraqis start to realize that their destiny is in their hands and the U.S. is just their to support them.  A terror-free Iraq is beter for the U.S. and the world.  We can't just leave now.  We need to finish the job and in the long run it will benefit the U.S.
1148123
i guess to stop these ltte's from placing mines and killing innocent women and children.  if the tigers are so f'ing hot, why dont they face the sri lankan army like men instead of lizards?  you should bite into that cyanide vial you probably carry around your neck too.  do the world a favor.  damn terrorists
470722
By giving the Tamils greater autonomy. The Sri Lankans do not have the strength to win this war and when you are not strong enough to crush your seperatists like the Indians did in Punjab and in Kashmir, its best to seek peace. Adopt a formula that will allow Sri Lanka to remain a State similar to the one that exists today and within it give the Tamils autonomy.  If you delay too long, then the Tamiols may reject the offer and you may have to accept a split in the country.  Better to act now.\n\n\nscourge
1020491
Yes, y not?  Bush is trying to rid a country of murderous assholes.  Hes doing the right thing.  and all the people that say the war is bad and all that, just talk to someone in the military that has been over there.  they will all tell you how proud they were to be over there, to see the faces of the people they have helped and to have so many people coming up to them and thanking them, so just shut up about the war.
960065
the only occupation that ever worked for us was Japan, we are not designed to occupy Iraq. All that its doing is killing our troops and spending billions of tax dollars when we have better things to do. I support our troops, have sent 2 of my sons and 2 son in laws there. But the war was wrong from get go, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, if you believe the gvernment version of 9/11 it was all Saudi comnspiarators who committed the deed, yet we have not lifted a finger, not imposed a sanction against them! Hussien may have been evil, but the Saudi Roayl family is just if not more evil on a scale of evil. Its like if the neighbor kid punches you in the nose, so you kick the crap out of someother kid and let the attack go as if nothing happened! If we want a war of retalaition invade Saudi Arabia, I guarentee Bin Ladden will return home to defend his country, hell nuke em then we can use the oil  for gas and night lights! Wake up America! Bush, Chenny must be impeached
790609
What a mess! USA, Saudi, Saudi, Turkey, Iran, Syria all looking to control the Iraqi oil, the US. sure has a lot to answer for, the instability is has created will cause problems for many years in the middle east, was this the intention? maybe it was, oilmen love high oil prices, arms manufacturers, and military suppliers love war. This catastrophe was predicted, but ignored. Now no-one can predict what will happen next, but you can sure there will be no peace in the region. The Bush regime will back the Saudis as they are like one big family, maybe Saudi approves/ helped develop US. policy, whatever happens the Shites will unite, and if they are bombed they'll unite more quickly. The US. will continue to guard their stolen oil fields, until their war funding is cut off, and when they are forced to leave it will be a free-for-all.
772281
It doesn't make any difference to me. and as far as east timor goes tthat is a peace keeping operation run mainly by th afp and tha reason we went in there in the first place was becaus they were nearing a civil war. also with iraq before that occured we had 180 people killed in bali and the australian embassy in jakarta bombed killing 9 ondonesian civilians forcing one young child to leave indonesia to come to ausraliabecause it killed her father so the iraq war made no difference to security level as far as i can see it and which are the democrats
1171118
Sri Lanka has been suffering under the Tamil insurrection for many years.  We don't hear much about it in the U.S., but that doesn't mean we are completely ignorant to the problem.
230727
Fisrt of all this is not "our" war, it is an invasion of Bush. I doubt if anyone would support it noneless an entire population!!
269910
After dumping his Buddy Musharraf,Bush is after India....the way pakistan lend its hand of assistance for BUSH in the war aginst terrorism,they deserve much more from the US.Now,its India,bush is promising the world and exploiting again all the possibilities india could render to the US.....The way Bush's snifer dogs sniffed the Mahatma Gandhi's memorial,no-one on earth would dare to do the same if anyone wanted to visit any memorial in the US the way Bush did,how incensitive to other peoples sentiment.If the Indian security force hadnt posses the capability to secure the US president,the why the US authority has promised to sell more F-16's and F-18's and going ahead with the neuclear deal?Arent those weapons meant for So-Called responsible and able Forces?? can anyone name any other single country thats HYPOCRYTIC to that core like the US??
681019
I don't agree that the American government is unwittingly doing so. I believe that they are doing so as part of a broader agenda to keep their status as the only superpower in the world. \n\nTheir fling with India is to act as a check in east Asia to the rise of China. Historically, India has a better relationship with the US than China did. Thus as Asia's second most populous country, the US would want to promote growth in India to act as a counterbalance to that of China. India was meant to be groom as a strong competitor for China in order to slow down the rise and threat of China. However, in doing so, they damaged the relationship with Pakistan, so is crucial if they ever want to stem out terrorism in Afghanistan.\n\nAs for the middle east, the Bush government was trying to stabilize the oil market by attacking Iraq. However, Bush failed to consider the backlash or such an actions. I believe Bush did not forsee that such a war would be polarized into a religious war and have such great public outcry against the Americans. In short, he messed it all up.\n\nIn the midst of all the rumbles in Asia, Bush failed to take  actions on the rise of leftist leaders in his own backyard, South America. Trouble would rise from within S.America, and that Bush would scramble to put out the fire. In doing so, asia would once sink back into pre-Iraqi war state of relation. Natural cycle would eventually sort out all the rubbish Bush created for us. :)\n\nHowever, you have to strike out strong democracy as on the the key elements to make the world safer. The America government is proclaiming to be soldiers of democracy. It is this very idea that G Bush is using to attack Iraq after no WMD was found. I dont see how it makes the world safer when democracy is the war cry of a facist. :)
647366
The answer is no.  This country is in bad shape.  Millions of people are considered at a poverty level, and here we are spending all the nations money on Iraq.  Bush is just trying to finish what his father started.  We need to focus on the American peoples well being before Iraq.  If he wants to worry about something he need to put the troops in Afganistan (or however it is spelled) where the real threat is.