Is it right to hack Mr Saddam?
930856
Question goes even deeper:  Is it right to kill anyone in the name of the law?  Sadam certainly qualifies for the sentence under current guidelines.  But, in his case, like any case, is anyone really sending a powerful message telling others to avoid this type behavior or you will be killed?  Would Sadam evenly remotely had considered doing things differently.  \n\nSo is the death penalty a crime deterent.  Or, is it more a tool for emotional revenge?  When I was younger I used to strongly believe in the death penalty.  But now, I wonder if the whole ball of wax ever even slightly affects capital crime.  "Have to get caught, trials and appeals last several years, greater than even chance of getting life, some even accept their fate. \n\nBut to answer your question - he got what the law said the punishment must be... right or wrong!
49341
O! c'mon guys! We are talking abt a human here .I dont have any sympathy with Saddam whatsoever. But he is a human being, or at least we should remember that we are. so let just say that he should be punished for his deeds but that's not for us to decide.
1036045
just a friendly reminder to those that answered negatively to this question.\n\nnot all hackers are evil. if there were no hackers there would be no computers or internet for that matter.\n\nhave you helped develop any software lately? that is hacking.\n\nso are you saying this person is guilty until proven innocent?\n\ni have said some of these things myself. but it's time for a wake up call for all of us.
872184
ABSOLUTELY NOT !!!\nAND HE SHOULD GIVE BACK ALL THE MONEY, GIFTS AND PERKS THAT HE ACCEPTED WHILE THAT HYPOCRITE FOOLED EVERYONE !!!
756169
Sure. The guy is a hero. He brought peace to Iraq and united the country after decades of conflict. He had to be harsh and rule with an iron fist but look at the place now he's gone. The US invasion has cost tens of thousands of lives and wreaked civil war on that nation. Saddam can stay at my place anytime but President Bush can stay in the kennels with the rest of the dogs.
865346
And it appears as if they found people just like Saddam to run things. I sent this link to my senators and congressmen/women as well as my state house leaders. I asked them if they were aware of this and if so, how we could allow this to stand. Unacceptable.\n\nAnd yes, I think it is past time to commit to this war, no matter if it was right or wrong to start, we are in it now, get it over with. Win it. Given our technology, hardware and numbers, the only thing we are lacking at the moment is balls.
595987
Absolutely not!!! It can be hacked or intercepted by the government without warrant. Treat the Internet as if it were a sidewalk and say just what you would say and do there.
1105870
go ask Saddam he knows
507832
Some hacker you are, hehe. :)
933993
Simple answer: "might is right!" B ush and his cohorts have been able to cajole and bully the so-called 'alliance of the willing' to do his bidding - soverignty of independent nations be damned! Further, the victors could claim all rights and spoils.  In any case, the USA has arrogated to itself the right to interfere in every nation's affairs and to force upon others its form of "democracy"  As events now proved. the USA has taken on more than it can swallow and its reasons to topple Saddam all wrong and immoral.
1279
An intolerable breach of citizens' privacy!!! Suppose they see in you a person who is helping Irak to develop and build the mass destruction weapons Mr Bush "saw" there!!!? Well, just joking! But there is always the risk that data may  be used in a wrong and foul way.
14451
This is not exactly a Law & Ethics question.  Nevertheless, no, Iraq is not bound for its own self-destruction, at least no more so than when Saddam Hussein was running the country and slaughtering his own people.
406802
I dont think thats an intelligent question.  Be careful about asking for hacking tips on a large forum like this.
293429
Saddam Insane you insecure towlhead
599
No, in time of war and when national security is threatened, it is lawful to take such action. 9/11 changed alot of things.\n\nBTW-Should John F. Kennedy have been impeached for spying on Martin Luther King?
953115
Yes.  The invasion was the right thing, done for the right reasons.  \n\n1.  As reported by the BBC, CNN, and the NYTimes, there was certainly 600 metric tons of unenriched uranium, along with 1.5 tons of enriched uranium, in a country that had no nuclear reactors.  And, the Brits ruled that the assertion of Saddam still trying to buy uranium after the 1992 cease-fire (around 1999) was indeed accurate.  The US Congress had the same findings.  \n\n2.  Saddam had thrown out the weapons inspectors, and in fact threated to use chemical and nuclear weapons until he was deposed from power.  Every intelligence service in the world thought he had at least chemical weapons, and they knew about the uranium.  So, the lack of ready-to-use WMDs is an understandable mistake.  Bill Clinton argued that there were WMDs when he was President.\n\n3.  There was certainly a death toll before the invasion.  As you might recall (probably not, but we'll play along), this started when Saddam invaded Iran in the 1980's.  To pay for that war, he invaded Kuwait.  After he was kicked out of Kuwait, a state of war (a la Korea) still existed in the area, and shooting happened almost every day.  Bill Clinton and Bush '41 regularly launched attacks against Iraq.  \n\nIn retaliation, Saddam killed around 100,000 of his people in order to stay in power, and in an attempt to convince the world that the embargo was starving children.  \n\n4.  The invasion certainly prevented a situation like Korea, where we've been at war for 50 years, a full army camped on both sides of the DMZ.  \n\nHOWEVER...\n\nHistory will judge Bush harshly for his conduct of the occupation.  No one in the Bush administration seemed to understand Iraq, or had any plans for the occupation.  Notable among the mistakes:\n\n- not having enough troops in place behind the invasion force to keep the peace\n\n- Disbanding the Iraqi army, then having to start a new Iraqi army from scratch.\n\n- Firing most of the bureaucracy of the government, at a time when most of the government buildings were in ruins, insuring that there would be no government institutions in place to run the country.\n\n\nIs that honest enough?
448001
" Technically " NO- heck no- First off it's not like you hacked in - its an open site, second all you did was view a web page - now if you start to change your routines to coincide with his or you start going thourhg his garbage or something then you might have a problem. Besides, most talk is not " in passing" if he said it, it's because he wants people to visit  the site- -but do not confuse his wanting people to view the site with his wanting you in any deeper sort of way