Identify how the underlined pronoun is being used:?
919641
Object of a preposition.
712363
It is not a sentence...\n\nBeneath the noted universal concerns there lies a distinctive world view.\n\n Or better yet use a semi colon after the word preceeding but ..then replacing it with however and a comma...like this \n\n" ; however, beneath these universal concerns there lies a distinctive worldview."
320754
I am guessing that it is a phrasal verb- please cut using it (like cut it out=stop it-> stop using it ).\n\nOr literally: Cut it when/before being used.\n\nThat's till where my imagination can work.\nHope it helps.
778765
It depends on which is the "subject", and which is the "predicate". "With" would presume association, whilst "By" would suggest Participation.
847801
In the sentence "what is the verb in this sentence?", the verb is "is".
1064292
PLEASE clarify. Why do you need an underline? Is this a worksheet? What is the question? Are you looking for the subject or predicate? The subject is band, the predicate is DECIDED TO PLAY THE CONCERT.
1014071
The 2nd sentence is correct and very formal; there is something like an old subjunctive form hidden in it.\nThe 1st sentence is (informally) not incorrect and could be found in British English.
186597
It's a shame the asker didn't include more of the surrounding text from this article so it could be analyzed more closely.  \n\nAnyhow, grammarians will concur that the structure:  \n\n"...active surveillance and robust peer intervention among high-risk groups such as female sex workers had had an impact in the South..." ,\n\nIS, technically, correct.  Sacramento Dweller was correct in identifying this seemingly awkward grammatical structure as a matter of tense.  Sentences utilizing this particular structure generally fall under the category of "Conditional Sentences."  Sentences featuring the 'had had' syntax are classified as "The Third Conditional," or "Conditional Type Three," and can generally be diagnosed by analyzing them for similarities with following structural formulae:\n\n(The Type 3 Conditional / Third Conditional Formula:)\n\n" IF + <insert past perfect tense verb> + <insert perfect conditional tense verb> = RESULT OF SUPPOSED CONDITIONS.*\n\n*~NOTE:  RESULT(S) of the supposed conditions usually resemble one of the following two structures, depending on when events occurred:  \n\n(1.) Result:  <insert simple present or past tense verb to express an obvious, or predictable fact / outcome>\n\n(2.) Result:  <insert modal verb  + simple present or past tense verb to express a known fact / outcome >\n\nEXAMPLE #1:  "If you had had proper training as an assassin, we would not be in this situation..."\n\nEXAMPLE #2:  "If I'd had proper training as an assassin, you probably wouldn't be here to complain."\n\n(Notice how in EXAMPLE #2, the contractions 'I'd' is used instead of saying, 'I had had' to illustrate the terms of the condition being discussed, though still allowing the reader to ascertain and understand the time-frame and sequence in which events occcurred?)\n\nRules for proper usage of the "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure state that the structures are 'to be used when talking about unreal, or "hypothetical" situations occurring in the past.'  That means, the related events DID NOT 'ACTUALLY' HAPPEN in the past.  Sentences utilizing this structure are almost always phrased to reckon, "If circumstances were different, what could / would have this been like?"  \n\nThe expression of time / tense in this [third] variety of conditional sentence structure IS identified as the past, and indicates that an action was completed "in" the past.  The condition and / or result, therefore, cannot logically be fulfilled because the action in the "IF" clause never actually happened.  Action in "Third Conditional / Conditional Type 3" sentence structure is almost ALWAYS characterized by the quality of being absurd, and impossible to achieve.\n\nTense and Terminology?\n\n-Simple Present Tense:  Expresses a fact, habit/routine, or ability.\n\n-Simple Past:  Implies that the action happened before and is not happening anymore.\n\n-Past Perfect (Pluperfect) Tense:  Relates that an action or event ended prior to another action or event.\n\n-Present Perfect (Continuous) [Past-composite] Tense:  Indicates either events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Perfect (Conditional) Tense: Relates varying degrees of certianty or uncertainty about events in recent past, or events which occurred in the past at an unknown time.\n\n-Modal Verbs:  incorporated with other verbs to illustrate the notion of possibility, impossability, necessity or other degree of probability.
939013
Wow. Everybody is wrong.\nYou have to choose which "case" of pronoun to use... the "nominative case" or the "objective case" of the pronoun.\nThe "nominative case" is used when the pronoun is\nused whent he prounoun is the SUBJECT of the sentence, or when the pronoun is used as a PREDICATE NOMINATIVE (with a reflexive verb, or a verb of being).\n"I am king of grammar"\n"The king of grammar is I."\n"Woe is I" (NOT "Woe is me.")\n\nYou use the OBJECTIVE CASE pronoun when the pronoun is being used as (a) a direct object or (b) the object of a preposition.\n\n"John handed me the grammar book" (I.O.)\n"Take me to your leader" (D.O.)\n"The award for king of grammer was given to me." (O.P.)\n\nAs others have (correctly) mentioned, multiple nouns or pronouns don't change the case of the pronoun, and a good test is to "scratch out" the other noun to see if it "sounds right."\n\n"John gave the ball to (Jim and I; Jim and me)" Scratch out the "Jim and" and it becomes easy: John gave the ball to me; therefore, the right answer is "John gave the ball to Jim and me."\n\nYour specific question is VERY VERY difficult because (a) the sentence structure is awkward (it's something you'd usually say rather than write) and you've got implied subjects and nouns here.\n\nLet's take the sentence fully:\nIf you were actually at the prom, you might say\nJohn and I are here, at the prom, (easy)\nor \nHere I am at the prom (easy)\n\nBut in this case you're not really at the prom; you're showing someone a picture.  So there are implied words  that are missing\nHere [is A PICTURE OF] John and (I, me) at the prom.\nNow, here's the rub!  The verb is a passive verb; normally, you'd use the predicate nominative case.  But, the implied words are missing "a picture OF" -- thus, John and you become the objects of the preposition "of" -- \nYou'd say "Here's a picture of US [objective case] at the prom."\nThus, you'd say "Here's a picture of John and me [objective case] at the prom."\n\nSo my vote would be that because there are the implied words of "a picture of" you'd use the objective case.\nOtherwise, you'd have to say that because the verb is a linking verb, a verb of being ("is") than you'd have to use the nominative case.\nHere [are] John and I at the prom.\n\nWhew!
835105
Statement : I'm sure everyone at my workplace would get involved in the sewing competition I have organised!\n\nAnswer: Why not likely men.\n\nYou get it? The 'why' in front of the sentence is just a form of expression. To show that one disagrees.
662941
None because:\n\n1.) There are robots all around making our lives easier.\n(took out comma)\n\n2.) There are robots all around, which make our lives easier.\n(added comma)\n*Note: This seems to be incorrect, so I will say that the answer MAY be #2, depending on how you were taught English.\n\n3.) There are robots all around; they make our lives easier.\n(changed comma into semicolon)
719448
You can use either when adding a qualifying clause afterwards.\n\n"I like the cat which is red"  "I like the cat that is red" both work. \n\nThat sounds a little more casual/natural.  Which sounds a bit more high brow formal.  \n\nThat can also double as a pronoun.  Avoid using the word "that" twice in a row however.  "That which is wrong"  vs "That that is wrong."
465570
This is similar to a very old example used in many grammar books to show the importance of punctuation to the meaning of a sentence. The original sentence was:\nA woman without her man is nothing (not "without a  man").\nDepending on where the punctuation is inserted, the sentence can have two different meanings:\nA woman, without her man, is nothing.\nA woman: Without her, man is nothing.
1007038
"there" is indirect speech\n"here" is called as "there"  in indirect speech
815158
There generally is a pronoun.  It only seems to be used as a \nadverb in older language, eg. Shakespeare, or the bible - "The Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed." — Genesis 2:8\n\nI've never seen it used as a verb.  Anyway, check out these pages -\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There\nhttp://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/there
403624
“Who” and whoever” are subjective pronouns; “whom” and “whomever” are in the objective case. As simple and important as that distinction is, many people have difficulty deciding on the proper usage of “who” and “whom” in sentences. \n    The two sentences below illustrate the easy usage in which “who” is clearly the subject and “whom”clearly the object. In such simple cases, virtually everyone can determine the proper choice: \n\n    Who is that masked man? (subject) \n\n    The men, four of whom are ill, were indicted for fraud. (object) \n\nThree “easy-to-use” rules\nso you'll always get it correct\n\n      Rule #1: Substitute “he/him” or “she/her”: If it's either “he” or “she,” then it's who; if it's “him” or “her,” then it's whom.\n\n     Rule #2: Every verb with a tense in a sentence must have a subject. And that word is always in the nominative case, so it's "who." For example: In this sentence, “I decided to vote for whoever called me first”:\n      • “I” is the subject of “decided”\n      • “he” (whoever) is the subject of the verb “called.”\n\n      In the sentence, “Give it to whoever deserves it”:\n      • The implied “you” is the subject of “give”\n      • "he" (whoever) is the subject of the verb “deserves.”\n      This rule supersedes the first rule as it relates to who” and “whom.”\n\n      Note: Related to this rule is one that says: The subject of a phrase is always attached to that phrase -- no matter what. For example:\n             Ask whoever reads that book to answer the question.\n\n     Break down the sentence thusly:\n     (You) ask him (he reads that book) to answer the question.\n\n     In the phrase “he reads that book,” you cannot separate the subject “he” from the phrase to which it is attached.\n\n     If you remember these two rules -- substitute “he/him” or “she/her,” and that every verb with a tense must have a subject -- you should solve the "who/whom" quandary every time.\n\n     If you apply those two rules and you're still not sure, apply the all-important Rule #3.\n\n     Rule #3: If it takes more than a 30 seconds to figure it out, pick the one that sounds best to the ear (read it aloud) and move on. Why? Because even grammarians are likely to squabble over which to use. But always -- always -- apply rules #1 and #2 first.
175733
What a shame. So many incorrect answers.\n\nJim and I versus Jim and Me\nFor some writers and speakers, the case of a pronoun becomes especially troublesome when that pronoun is compounded with something or someone else. When the pronoun is being used as a subject, there is usually no problem:\n\nJim and I are playing tennis this afternoon.\nJim and she are playing tennis this afternoon.\nWe learn this lesson so well — getting cuffed on the ears and being forced to stand in the corner when we say "Jim and me are playing tennis. . . " — that when the object form of the pronoun is truly called for, we're apt to come up with the subject form instead, as in "Grandma left Jim and I her rocking chair," which is bad form, indeed. \n\nThere is a simple rule here that seems to work very well, at least in writing. Ask yourself what pronoun form you would use without adding the other person — "Grandma left me her rocking chair" (coming up with the correct form for the indirect object) — and then, when you add the other person, don't change the form of the pronoun: "Grandma left Jim and me her rocking chair." \n\nThis rule works whether the pronoun is being used as an indirect object, as above, as a direct object — "The policeman stopped Jim and me" — or as the object of a preposition — "Grandma gave her rocking chair to Jim and me." Some writers and speakers will mistakenly say "This is just between Jim and I," not realizing that the preposition "between" calls for the object form of both pronouns, including "me."\n\nThe rule also pertains to sentences in which a pronoun is compounded with yet another pronoun: "Grandma gave her rocking chair to him and me, but that's just between you and me."\n\nNotice that when "I" is compounded with another subject, the "other person" or people get first billing: "Jim and I are playing," not "I and Jim." This is one of the very few polite forms in English.