Want to know if the Code of Civil Procedure 1908  section 60 is applicable to Co-Op Banks about the attachmen?
927366
Surely an act that was passed in 1908 will have been updated since then so what you are looking at may no longer be applicable.  If they are over deducting, then you should be able to get the excess back.  All banks should have to comply.  I think you may need a good accountant or lawyer to help you with this one.
72131
try http://www.lawyers.com \n\nits run by Lexis Nexus, a wonderful source for all legal research needs, and may help you find exactly what you are looking for.
139394
this is under the law of bailment. when you are borrowing something from someone you generally owe duty of reasonable care as to that which you are borrowing.
295555
Yep, but depending on what state you're in anwhere from 25% to 70% will be deducted for fines, court fees, restitution and any other court ordered debt, such as child support or alimony.\nThe completion of a pending civil matter is not considered "Conducting business"
239758
You should contact the Bank directly and ask them.  You won't get any good answers here.
1077061
www.banking.state.ny.us/wb050225.htm
420256
Right here:\nhttp://www.nmcourt.fed.us/web/BCDOCS/Files/cortlocs.htm
273099
The uniform commercial code applies to a wide variety of contracts, including sales of goods, leases, bills and notes, electronic funds transfers, secured transactions, many security transactions, bills of lading and warehouse receipts.  The provisions of the UCC are supposed to create uniformity and certainty.  However, they are supplemented by custom and usage, trade practices and common law as well.  \n\nSo for example, the second restatement of contracts may supplement a provision of the uniform commercial code where the code is not explicit on this point and there are no cases decided in the state which are subject to the principles of the code.\n\nIn addition, the UCC does not cover real estate.  So real estate contracts, to the extent not governed by statute may also be decided with reference to the Restatement.\n\nThe UCC is codified law of a state.  The Restatement is not codified law of any state, but reflects a consensus statatment of the laws of the states in general. Restatements of Law are useful to supplement statutory or decisional law in a jurisdiction where there is no dispositive precedent.\n\nThe Court would apply the UCC if it applied and cases pertaining to the UCC.  The Restatement would only apply to supplement or in a case where the UCC did not apply at all.   A good example of a case where common contract law would apply would be a personal services contract, such as a for a sports figure or a movie star.  Restatement principles could supplement common law or case law in any given state.\n\nHope this is helpful.
840949
Nope.\n\nAs long as the law is one designed for the benefit of the community, it is allowed. The only exception are laws which violation some specific guarantee or limits imposed by the constitution.
491285
Unfortunately , under Section 10B(6)(ii)clearly states as below\n   "no loss referred to in sub-section (1) of section 72 or sub-section (1) or sub-section (3) of section 74, in so far as such loss relates to the business of the undertaking, shall be carried forward or set-off where such loss relates to any of the relevant assessment years 72[ending before the 1st day of April, 2001];\n\nSince the loss was incurred up to Asst Yr 2001-02 in you case, no loss as per the scheme of provision shall be allowed.\n    I would say , your company needed tax planning from beginning for tackling such problem.
965215
this is not legal,you can sue that bank if its how you said it is ,that it not the correct procedure in their terms and conditions,\nyou have rights too!!!
397523
PLEASE CHECK WITH A LAWYER.
623804
THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE.  YOU SHOULD SEEK ADVICE OF COUNSEL WITH KNOWLEDGE OF LOCAL LAWS.\n\nBetter check your loan agreement, promissory note or other debt instrument.  Many companies include in the terms of their debt instruments a right to call the full amount due at any time, at their discretion.  If this clause exists in your debt instrument then they may be within their rights to do so.  If the clause is not in your agreement you may have some ability to fight their claim for immediate full payment. \n\nGood luck!
1103603
http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/
723911
Try the UK court website HCMS.  They should be able to help you.
132727
Section 147 of the N.I.Act:- notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, every offence punishable under this Code (N.I. Act) shall be compoundable.\nanything else?\nmuse_christ@yahoo.com
1006997
This question can easly be answered by an attorney if you have the code you must have all ready be advised are have looked into this matter through the law library.\nMy suggestion to you answer your question is to do this I wish you the best of luck in your adventure.