Is V. Putin responsible for the death of the former agent in UK?
925938
No: too much evidence is pointing toward him. This is a blatant attempt at a set-up\n\nHe's no idiot. If he wanted to take a guy out, it wouldn't be so obvious.\n\nThis is not to say he wouldn't have (or hasn't had) someone assasinated: I have no doubt in my mind he'd do it without even thinking twice.\n\nHowever, he's no amateur, and this looks like a real amateur set-up attempt.
319426
I believe Russia does it, unfortunately...
172809
i do not agree with you becasue in Scotland they had set up a satalite to examine the process. Also if it were a hoax then the amount of people employed say 10,000 would have to keep a goo secret which is unlikely. Also if it were a hoax how come Russia didnt say anything if it were? The movement of the flag is basically sice there is nothing to take the energy away when and astranaught twisted it in, it just simply contined to spin
817986
It certainly looks very suspicious since as far as I know they have not yet identified the exact cause of death.  They have not been able to identify the poison.  The method is much like the Soviet style stings used in the past.  His friends are blaming Russia, and he was kept under armed guard at the hospital, so someone must have felt he was in extreme danger.
754302
Yes, Al Quada was responsible for the attack on the twin towers on 9/11/2001, but Bin Laden may not have been responsible.\n\nBin Laden is said to have approved the attack, but he had nothing to do with the actual planning and he is not in charge of Al Quada.  Bin Laden is a rich Saudi and a great contributor to the cause of Al Quada.  Without a doubt some of his money was used to fund the attack, but it is doubtful if Bin Laden is in charge of Al Quada.  However, at the time the Bush Administration announced its vendetta against him he was the highest Al Quada leader we knew of.\n\nThe death of Bin Laden will not stop Al Quada; in fact it will survive the death of any one of its leaders, even if we are able to kill the entire leadership someone will rise from the ranks to take over.  We have seen exactly this happen in Iraq.  However, if Bin Laden were killed then that would cut off a lot of Al Quada's funding.\n\nIf cutting the "head" off the beast won't work then the US Government will be happy to cut off the "foot" (Bin Laden) so it can't keep running.\n\nAl Quada would not take the blame from anyone else.  They are quite proud of their crime and are extremely happy to take credit for it.  The successful attacks prove that Al Quada is a powerful force in the world of international terrorism.  Hamas and Hezbollah would love to pull something like that off in the US.  Because of their attacks against the US Al Quada are heroes in the Middle East.\n\nI also don't believe the conspiracy theories that the US somehow helped, wanted, or pulled off the attacks.  There are much easier ways to plan for a war in Iraq.  In fact Bush's staff was looking for some excuse so George Junior could "finish" Daddy's War.  I don't like the Bush Administration, but I don't think they would be capable of doing something like this.\n\nIF however, I were wrong, if somehow they or part of the government were behind the attacks then the news of that would have surely leaked out by now.  News that powerful simply can't remain hidden.  The thing that most conspiracy nuts forget is that it takes more than 2 or 3 people to pull off these big conspiracies.  It has been said, "Two people can keep a secret, if one of them is dead."   Talk about a huge story, if someone just had a rumor of proof they could go to any newspaper and become famous overnight.  Then they could go on the talk show network and become rich, all the while being a huge hero in the eyes of every American, not to mention the book deal.  That kind of temptation is too strong to resist and that is why I know that the big conspiracies aren't real. People love to gossip too much and the rewards for busting a conspiracy this big would be worth almost any risk, even the risk of your own life and the lives of your family.  If someone got that news out then they would have it made for the rest of their lives.\n\nWhat we need to worry about is Al Quada’s threat to take out the Capitol or White House.  Al Quada was behind the first bombing of the World Trade Center.  When that failed they came up with a new plan.  They are working on another plan right now.  Hopefully they are too tied up fighting us in Iraq to pull anything off, but as so many leaders have said, “The terrorists only have to get lucky once.”\n\n·Al Quada was behind 9/11, they are proud of that fact and it makes them a force in the Middle East.\n·Bin Laden supported 9/11 with both money and his blessing, but he was not responsible for it.\n·Any conspiracy that the US government could have somehow been involved in the attack just won’t hold up to scrutiny.  The simple fact that no credible evidence has been found to date that the US had something to do with the attack proves it.
600819
no, i think russia is trying to regain some glory and it oil company threathen europe, thus we are involved.
424400
I can see both sides of the argument.  The press is saying Prince harry could be kept behind front lines if it were determined that he couldbe a liability.. and he could.  Could you imagine what would happen if the bad guys found out where he was?  They'd be crazy not to exploit it.  Go after England's royalty and get even more press, not mention more people outraged.  But Harry has repeatedly said he joined to be an Officer, not a desk jockey.
892456
She had compromised her position in MI5 to the extent that the only option they had was to fake her death.\nIt's unlikely she will return.
172706
According to a reliable source Omar Torrijos dies as a result of a plane accident rather than through murder.\n\nA good extract can be found under the "Panama" section of the Bulletin Board of http://www.hica-world.com
707371
al qaeda is a secret arm of the CIA... so if it was them, we'd know about it, it would be all over the news and every one would be in hysterics.... the war on terror being how much the US and UK can keep their population terrified... it's hard work really.\n\njoking aside...\n\nthis radiation is something else entirely, it could be either russia, or UK or US secret service....  i only say this because the US does have an interest in discrediting Putin.  putin, he no like bush, and bush very nervous of man who doesn't speak english as first language and not his friend.
601112
That Bush isn't to be trusted. All of America knows that's true why shouldn't the Russians. Putin knows Bush's policies are failing in America, that is a sign of a brilliant man and leader. I read some comments from above and they aren't very smart. Putin has total cooperation from the split states such as the Ukraine and the Baltic States, so their military might is still a major problem. George Bush is crying wolf to a ex KGB officer, and I don't think he is listening to him either.
248641
Well besides a lot of the people who post questions and answers here, I would have to say it was that Russian guy who was into cannibalism.  He killed like 60 people I think.  What a nut job.
939670
'We've always been at war with Eurasia'?\n\nDid you know that Winston died at the end; shot in the back of the head as he made his way down the corridor?\n\nBTW:  For the most part, I get the news on the web - only to gauge where the media thinks we are, then I analyze the material to see what they are peddling this time.  \n\nThen I come to my own conclusion, which for the most part is quite different from the popular view.
6832
Although I am 99.999% sure that they are not currently CIA agents, it would not surprise me in the slightest to learn that they had been on the payroll at one time.  But then, what is wrong with that.  Times change, enemies become allies, allies become enemies.  Russia was an ally during WWII, but then our mortal enemy right after.  I believe that during the Russian occupation of Afghanistan that Usama was heavily funded by us because he helped fight a greater enemy.  It isn't that we agreed with his policies then, it is just that he was a lesser threat than Russia was.  Same kind of situation with Iraq and Iran.  A the time, Saddam was the lesser threat than was Iran.  Remember, enemy of my enemy can sometimes be my temporary freind.
29105
That is certainly a sympathetic question considering the man just had his brother die.  \n\nWhile I realize that this is an anonymous forum, that doesn't mean we have to leave decorum at the entrance to the site.
261486
No. The british authorities concocted this story because they were impatient to hear from the coroner. She had no food or drugs in her system.She actually suffered a massive heart attack due to her bad eating habits and crash diets.
1048185
This is a good article.\n\nhttp://depts.washington.edu/pfes/pdf/EndLifeCare-Russian9_04.pdf