What Do Liberals Read Most, The New York Times, Washington Post, Or High Times?
915903
the national enquirer...
1066170
I know of one, Air America Radio.  \n\nWhat I love about this observation is we liberals always talk about the "conservative media" and the conservatives talk about the "liberal media".
974318
The liberal media, it could be a blood bath.
703697
The Liberal Spinnette.\nThe Conservative Truth.\nThe Daily Log.\nThe Information Page.\nContinental Times.\nColonial Times.\nRevolution Today.\nFree Press Tomorrow.
1146043
time magazine it is full of opinions instead of facts
432811
I'd like to know who the Liberal Media are today.  Is it someone like Judith Miller with a direct line to the White House? Or maybe it's the Fox News Channel on cable. Or Tucker Carlson and Chris Matthews on MSNBC.\n\nThe Liberal Media is a myth these days.  If it weren't for the New York Times, who have employed for many years persons of all political bent, including notable Conservative William Safire, and the above mentioned mouthpiece for the sitting President, we wouldn't ever know anything that the Executive Branch didn't want us to know.\n\nAdmittedly, much of the media we experience with national exposure are no longer impartial reporters of the news, and a survey of them would almost certainly favor the Conservative viewpoint. \n\nYou see where that's gotten us.  Most of what we have belatedly learned about the run up to the war has been from leaks from persons with a lot to lose, not from investigative reporting.\n\nAttila the Hun could own the different forms of media as far as I'm concerned, so long as the reporters and their managers were not constrained by the owner. \n\nHowever, that does not appear to be the case with owner Rupert Murdock, a foreigner, whose media holding seem only to present a Conservative viewpoint, with an occasional Liberal lamb decoy. I am very uneasy with this.
1006393
I think this goes for both liberals and conservatives.  It's just more obvious to you when you are on the receiving end of it.
1131721
Liberal Media Bias - 'nuff said!
596576
Read newspapers. Watch CNN and BBC.
670713
... usually a paper does a story on both candidates... maybe not on the same day though\n\nsome papers are very skewed toward the liberal or conservative sides though... depends on what you're reading...\n\nI don't think they have to offer it though... it's not regulated by the government as much like TV networks are...
149135
"Ann Hart Coulter (born December 8, 1961) is an American syndicated columnist, bestselling author, and television pundit. Her commentary has earned her a reputation as a strong critic of social and political liberalism. Her speaking and writing style is provocative and aggressive, with heavy use of sarcasm and hyperbole.\n\nCoulter is the author of four political commentary books, all of which have been on the New York Times bestseller list.\n\nCoulter is a legal correspondent for the magazine Human Events. Her syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate is carried by or linked to by many influential conservative websites, including Frontpagemag.com and Townhall.com. Coulter was the subject of a TIME magazine cover story in April 2005, and has made frequent guest appearances on national television and syndicated radio programs. She has appeared on a large number of topical talk shows, including Hannity and Colmes, The O'Reilly Factor, American Morning with Paula Zahn, Crossfire, The Today Show, Real Time and Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher, and The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. Coulter has also appeared in FahrenHYPE 9/11, a rebuttal of Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11.\n\nAnn Coulter was born in New York City into a Catholic family that she has described as "upper middle class". She was born on December 8, 1961 according to the New Canaan voting registration office, although she sometimes states that the year is 1963. She attributes her conservative opinions and her acerbic rhetorical style to her upbringing in Connecticut. She has two elder brothers. Her father, John V. Coulter, was a lawyer, known for his legal work in cases against labor unions; he later became a constable. Her mother, Nell M. Coulter, is a member of the New Canaan Republican Town Committee..."
825830
This liberal agrees with you.
571300
hooray for ignorance! \n\nMarxism and liberalism are polar opposites. Jesus H Christ you people need to do some research.\n\nOh..and newsmax doesn't qualify as a source of any sort.
1122689
Liberals only think of the present and what they want now. They don't look at the big picture and consider what the consequences\nof their actions and demands will be further down the road.
1098628
You would have a better chance getting an intelligent answer to your question on imbecilicdriviel.com.  \n\nThe communist on this site barely know how to read and if it wasn't for spell check, 90% of them couldn't write.  Why would you think they would they be at all interested in books.\n\nBTW - I love her.  I just can't figure out if it's because she's so in your face to these cowardly scum or if it's that she never writes a word without an objective, verifiable source.  You know, like Dan Rather used to do before he sold out and started making stuff up to suit his own agenda.\n\nFunny how the priorities in the country are different for different people.  Ann Coulter who is so popular because she always uses easily referenced sources is vilified by the left while those same people give a lying scumbag liberal a national anchor spot making millions a year for 20+ years.\n\nAnd the left is actually scratching it's head in disbelief that have not won a significant congressional or senatorial election since 1994.  \n\nAnd they think they're smart for exactly what reason?
1026756
I know the previous answerers will not probably read my answer so its meaningless to direct it to them, but to their claim that the media is liberal, here is my rebuttal:\n\nFirst, the media companies are not non-profit organizations. There aren't that many diverse news/media companies in the first place and those that do exist are under a few corporate umbrellas that donate to the Republican party. The people who run these companies are rich, privileged men. They are also pretty intelligent. They are not as stupid as Ann Coulter. So they keep a low profile and they let their company take the garb of being liberal. Wolf in sheep's clothing, shall we say? The "bias" is kept "liberal" for a reason. I mean come on, if you went all out and claimed the media companies to be conservative would anybody trust them anymore? Yeah right! So this is a very subtle move which my republican friends do not have the acumen to understand. So you build trust among the liberals by pretending to be their friend, and slowly build up your case. These are not foolish people after all.\nSecond continuing on the thought of corporations that exist for profit: who gains when these news companies make money? When you watch the news, buy the magazines? I don't. I am sure most of you don't either. The owners and executives do. And what is the political affiliation of the executives of these companies?\nI will let you look up Michael Ganzi of Hearst Corp. (that owns Popular Mechanics amongst a host of other publications), Rupert Murdoch of News Corporation (Fox, Harper Collins), John Engler (member of Board of directors of Dow Jones, Republican governor of Michigan) to name a few. These are people to make the decisions how and what to publish through various media. Just these 3 companies Hearst, Fox and Dow Jones control an ENORMOUS segment of the media industry. AND they are all republican controlled.\nThird, these businessmen are not stupid. If they produced ONLY left wing news then the right wing wouldn't buy it. If they produced only right wing news then the left wing wouldn't buy it. And that would hurt half their business. So they spread their products evenly, some left, some right. New York Times right, New York Post left... just mix it up, have people buy it, get the checks from the bank. And if you can mix in a little controversy, by making a leftist slant, then it will sell more!!\nEventually where does the buck stop? At the executives' desk. And they are all right wingers (I prefer wrong wingers as a better descriptor).\n\nAnyways, I am sure my republican friends wouldn't understand all this logic. They are simple minded people and don't really follow the intricate ways the GOP top brass think and act.\n\nSo how do we counter the right wing media?\nUse the Internet. Blogs, personal news, word-of-mouth is the new face of news. The printing press ushered in Renaissance and was instrumental in the dissemination of ideas by people like Voltaire, Locke, Rousseau, Descartes etc.. that led to the French Revolution and eventually emancipated Europe and America. I say the Internet is the printing press of this age. Blog, write, disseminate. There are some intelligent republicans who do this as well. But most of them are not there yet. The liberals at least have that one advantage: of education. Put it to good use.
1019239
the encroachment of liberalism