"I think that whe shouldn't blame Bush for what ever that happened in the world because after all, Bush is und
916089
how about we just agree that all politicians are crooks and liars and move forward. but unless your like 10 years old, if you don't have a job by now then your more than likely to be a burden on society. if you want to become a republican all you need to do is have personal responsibility, be against the murder of Innocent babes ( libs and Dem's justify this by calling it abortion ).want to fight for our freedoms which libs to often take for granted. and most of all kick any sickos out of office as they did with Foley, and not reelect them like the Dem's did with Gerry Studds.\n\nand if you like that earned income credit don't be surprised when the Dem's take it from you with even higher taxes, it is what they are well known for. but hay they might give you some food stamps so they can say they help the poor.
657138
I am an American and I do not remember Bush discussing the war with me. So I blame him.
1014200
OBVIOUSLY, it's all clinton's fault. Bush couldn't POSSIBLY have fvcked anything up THIS bad, right? He's GAWD'S president, remember?
254523
Most of America isn't behind President Bush; because he mislead America into the War. The United Nations should have handled any problems with Iraq regardless what a fresh inexperienced President thought at the time. This was total carelessness with his approach to this or any problem that he has tried to solve. I know that he will be gone, but will the World get over the damage that the Bush administration has lead America into? These questions will only answered in time. I personally think he is insane. Hitler was insane, so was Stalin, and Saddam. I wish we could end all of this soon. Bush was a target, an open target with his politics and views. That has been the problem from the get-go. The World doesn't buy all of that NEO-CONSERVATIVE crap anymore, and they don't want it imposed on them. The Republicans have been invading a World market for some time know and these people don't like the abuse anymore than the American Working Man ever did. Their is to much footage available to access the way the American Labor market has been treated over the last 20 years. It was our labor that built America and made America a great nation. We were then models of society, and other nations wanted to model after us and get the American dream. Where is the dream today? Vote the Tyrants out in November!
587337
Wonder whose fault he thinks it is.\n\nFact is, he merrily supported an illicit president, who made a bad decision and justified it with spurious'proof' of nonexistent Weapons of Mass Destruction, to meddle in a sovereign state's internal affairs, to go into Iraq and completely destroy a functioning society.\n\nCertainly it was an unpalatable society to many people.  But it is ultimately the right and responsibility of the citizens of a sovereign state to turf out the people whose government they do not want, that is part of the democratic process.\n\nIn any event, the West supports an idiot, and the crooks surrounding him, who has a skewed interpretation of democracy.  Palestinians democratically elected a government The Bush and Blair et al do not like.  In 1953 Iranians democratically elected a government the US did not like, and they deposed him, put the autocratic, corrupt Shah in his place, and are now reaping the results.\n\nFor Blair one can't have a lot of sympathy.  If you play with fire you will get burnt.
1117155
You have rattled allot of folks in here.My hat off to you.If I had a choice to report the abuse yes I would choose to do so.I know many people are divided in what they choose to believe or not believe,but look at all the horrible things that have happened over the past 6 years.I believe it speaks for itself.When will we as Americans be free of the follies of the government and the Presidents who do not care about their own people.I am not just saying Bush is to blame I am stating he has become one of the many problems we face now.
622360
Here are some facts you should know about past presidents. The world after them was fine and I think it will be fine after Bush.\n\n\nThere were 39 combat related killings in Iraq in January.\nIn the fair city of Detroit there were 35 murders in the month of January. That's just one American city, about as deadly as the entire war-torn country of Iraq.\n\n\n\nWhen some claim that President Bush shouldn't have started this war, state the following:\n\n\n\na. FDR led us into World War II.\n\nb. Germany never attacked us; Japan did.\n>From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost ...\nan average of 112,500 per year.\n\n\n\nc. Truman finished that war and started one in Korea.\nNorth Korea never attacked us..\n>From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost ...\nan average of 18,334 per year.\n\nd John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962.\nVietnam never attacked us.\n\ne. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire.\n>From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost ..\nan average of 5,800 per year.\n\nf. Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent.\nBosnia never attacked us.\nHe was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three\ntimes by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on\nmultiple occasions.\n\ng. In the years since terrorists attacked us , President Bush\nhas liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled\nal-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Libya, Iran, and, North\nKorea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who\nslaughtered 300,000 of his own people.
191667
Indirectly I think maybe he did, with what happened with 9/11 and how Bush handled it.  I never looked at something like that.
600998
Yes I do, President Bush is an excellent president, who confronts difficult problems instead of ignoring them.  He does the right thing even when it would be easier for him to do the wrong thing.  He is largly responsible for removing the Taliban and Saddam Hussein from power.
349771
Remember this rule:  If it's bad, it's Bush's fault.  If it's good, it's because Bush ignored it and didn't mess it up.  Of course, this rule is thrown out the window when there's a Democrat in the White House, because as we all know, only Republicans can be bad.  Enjoy the Kool-aid.
1090128
The world would be a safer place without Bush's antic's, without Bush much of the things that have happened wouldn't have happened. He is feeding the terrorist, which in turn feeds himself.
1124000
Yes, that's just like us Democrats, blaming Bush for EVERYTHING.\n\nIncidentally, Nuke, which of the following do you think Bush had nothing to do with?:\n\nGuantanamo Bay \nWiretapping\nLies to America about Iraq's nuclear capabilities and intentions\nThe Iraq War\nAmerica's Failed Energy Policy\nThe Deficit\nThe Debt\nWorldwide Anti-Americanism\n\nDamn...I'm tired of typing. Tell you what, take a shot at these, and then I'll give you the next 20.
820398
If wer're going by that logic then George H.W. Bush is at fault for Clinton's failures.
809698
It is not all Rumsfelds fault, but he had to go. The failed policy's of the Bush administration which he is one has got to be changed and this is a start. The election yesterday sent a message to Washington and I think that they might not be ignoring it this time. I think it is a change for the better.
448173
TO RUN THIS COUNTRY I WOULD NOT BLAME HIM FOR THE ODD HIT.\nIF ITS TRUE HE MOST DEFINATLY NEEDED IT.\nIF ITS FALSE HE IS A STRONGER MAN THAN EVERYONE THINKS.
1125603
President Bush was put in a situation that no President has been in in a long time (Pearl Harbor)--when the United States was attacked on their own soil. We take for granted that we are surrounded by the ocean and idiots (Canada, Mexico, and Cuba, for example.) We had to send a message to the world that the United States will not sit around and be attacked. While the gas prices have jumped considerably since his Presidency started, it isn't entirely his fault. He has tried to drill in Alaska for oil but the Democrats will not let him. While he may have a big stake in the gas and oil industry, he certainly doesn't need the extra money from it. I would say that for all that he has had to deal with he has done a tremendous job.
989532
NO.  President Bush is just a talking head puppet if you will for forces that control all governments.  I don't think the terrorist identified were responsible or had the resources to pull off an attack like that.  Our government is definitely covering up what happened that day.  There is overwhelming evidence to support that it was an inside job.  I don't think Bush is directly responsible but probably knows what happened.  Any agency or government institution that aids in the cover up or conceals evidence indirectly implies guilt.  They needed a new Pearl Harbor to gain support for there agenda.  Who knows who these behind the scenes people are and exactly what there up to