is it true that no nation can withdraw from the UN?
917627
you can read simple UN regs and policy  on computer.
87733
No it isnt.  Thats just another example of the UN showing its true colors.
996512
I don't think it could happen at least in the realistic sense.  A nation is defined by its borders.  How can one nation have many borders on different contents.  You can have an economic union something of the sort of the E.U. but they are adrift with no real Constitution and have multiple social issues.
84902
The UN doesn't rule the world.  The UN doesn't condemn terrorist attacks against Israel.  The UN blew it's job in Africa, whatever their conditions for war doesn't mean ANYTHING.
761447
No please be aware that the UN is aware of the nuclear capability in Pakistan.  As you are aware of this also, but afraid to leave an IM addy, or email address to have intelligent conversation regarding such, why do you really ask this question?  The answer is no, and, don't be afraid.
1162804
yes, the UN is controlled by the free masons. they also do more harm than good eg, the sex for food scandal. where UN officers were trading food that starving people were suppose to be receiving in the 1st place were being traded in exchange for sex, small girls and boys were exploited.\n\ngo here for more info\n\nhttp://www.intellectualconservative.com/article3483.html
801127
Yes it is possible\nWhat you need to do is build your own island, and declare it a new country. Then you can have your own laws -- even the ones that will let you eat watermelon.\n\nHowever there is always a risk that some other country will invade your island and annex it.\n\nsee:\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Minerva
413964
No, there isn't.  The person pulling up Wikipedia should have looked at the last line of the first paragraph.\n\n"It is not an independent state."
41094
192 independent countries are members of the U.N., but that doesn't include the Vatican City - which is technically a country - who have chosen not to join.\n\nThere are 192  different countries that the United States recognizes, but it gets tricky when you talk about Taiwan. There are those that would argue that Taiwan isn't really a coutnry (like China, who claims that it is a Chinese province). \n\nEven though Taiwan was a member of the U.N. up until 1971, it is not recognized as a country because of politcal reasons.  \n\nSo if you count Taiwan as a country (though it isn't internationally recognized as one) and the Vatican City, there would be 193.\n\nTo John C.: You have to remember that when you are counting countries, places that are governed by other countries, like Puerto Rico, the U.K., Bermuda, Palestine and others, don't count because they are actually provinces or colonies.
915725
Actually, there is not anyone or anybody, that has binding power over the U.S., but it is on a voluntary basis that the U.S. could bring the dispute to the United Nations, or to the International Court in Hague, and then the U. S. could agree to be bound under whatever was decided.\n\n For example, for action against Iraq, Bush wanted to just go ahead and act against Iraq; but some people in his administration asked that Bush go through the United Nations so, that it has some type of world policy platform. BUT, the U.S. is not under any obligation to obey the United Nations at all. It is a voluntary agreement.
198533
They do not have the weapons.\nThey can if they want to....many options available to them.\nThey want to prove to the world that the UNO is manipulated by the USA and western powers and this nonsense has to stop someday.
401879
As if \nlol!\nEven though they founded the UN, and they house the UN, they seem incapable of working with the rest of the world at times!
28908
No people are in the UN, only countries.  The UN is not mostly European, it consists of virtually every country in the world.   \n\nThere is plenty wrong with the Un -- but calling it a "pansy" organization is a little silly.
247361
If I remember right, it was not. You can go to www.un.org.
1159179
in the UN?\n\nlol\n\nhell fucking no\n\nlol
149591
If that happens the US will pull all our funding and whatever troops that are under their peacekeeper control.\n\nWithout US support there is NO UN.  \n\nSo they can try.  I would love to get rid of that organization it has done nothing but steal, bad mouth the US and Israel, and waste our money.\n\nWe haven't done anything that we shouldn't have anyway.  Well the Bay of Pigs but that was Kennedy leaving the Cubans out to dry
1168404
no 1 has any ans , it can b true cuz nuthin is impossible