How do you say Jesus in panjabi and gujurati?
931109
Jesus is known as Issa.   eesa
594401
You can't..\nLearing Indian languages is not a piece of cake.
525816
BOY: Dhairya (patience), Dhanraj (king of wealth), Dhimant (intelligent), Dhir (wise), Dhiraj (patience), Dhruv (firm)\n\nGIRL: Dhana/Dhanna (wealthy), Dhanya (thankful/ lucky), Dhara (earth/ flow), Dharini/ Dharti (earth), Dhriti (patience), Dhwani (melody/ music), Dhyana (meditation)
971283
JAI SAI RAM\n\n        Mrs & Mr ------ request the pleasure of your company  & prayer  for an evening of bhajans  to Shri Shirdi Sai Baba the ocean of love and blessing .\n Venue\n date\ntime\nrsvp\n                                                               Regards & love\n                                                                -------------------
1176635
This is just the way they are spelled down in English, which is why you might think there is a link when there is none. \nDubai : Arabic\nMumbai : Sanskrit/Hindi\nThey above are Semitic, and Indo European languages respectively. The others are Oriental, which are completely different. \nAnd I also think that they are pronounced slightly differently in their native languages. The above are Anglicized versions.
19162
Chetan .... means life.\nChudamani .... means crest jewel \nLagan... (appropriate time)\nLakshmigopal (Lord vishnu) \nLakshman (younger brother of Rama) \nLakshmibanta (fortunate) \nLakshmidhar (Lord Vishnu) \nLakshmikanta (Lord Vishnu) \nLalit (beautiful) \nLalitkishore (beautiful) \nLalitkumar (beautiful) \nLalitmohan (beautiful) \nLambodar (Lord Ganesh) \nLankesh (Ravana) \nLatafat (elegance) \nLatif (elegant) \n\ni hope this helps you.
111969
The second word is probably "verse." So it could be:\nfree verse\nuni verse
1094889
I have only one thing to say about this.\n\nHare Krishna, Hare Krishna,\nKrishna Krishna,\nHare Hare.\n\nHare Rama, Hare Rama,\nRama, Rama, \nHare Hare.\n\n(Faster)\n\nHare Krishna, Hare Krishna\nKrishna, Krishna,\nHare Hare,\n\nHare Rama, Hare Rama\nRama, Rama\nHare Hare.\n\n\nIt's catchy!
87157
jesus never died on the cross. he actually lived. he escaped to kashmir in india and spent his remaining life there . his tomb lies there to this day.
599298
Sneha,\nAn Indian Right >>>>\nTell me have you ever seen Gulab or Jamun in Gulab Jamun.
671921
Oyee Chaak de phatee...\n\nKamal hai Praji..twadi jokan di factory mass production kardi jaat hai..kardi jaati hai..\n\nHa hahahaha
470622
naku enti?????\n   \n\n\n\nshiv sunder das
650804
jIvikA,chalana,2. dauDa kA mArga,3. dauDa,gati,chAla\n\n\n\nsarapaTa jAnA,2. teja jAnA
68246
the official language of Srilanka   -  Sinhala and Tamil
47952
They both are actually, but you'll be safer using the most used form, Jesus' ... not all teachers know that you can use it both ways :)
279893
In Arabic - كرما\nIn sanskrit - कर्मा
1097599
A:  There are four traditions about Jesus the Christ of Nazareth.\n\n1:  The traditional Biblical Tradition.\nNever married.  Did not have children.  Died on the Cross.\n\n2:  The Kashmir tradition.\nThere are half a dozen variations in this tradition.\n* Never married / married Mary of Magdala.\n* One version states that he visited India prior to preaching the Gospel message.  \n* No Children / One child / not mentioned.\n* Was crucified but recovered / Judas was crucified in his place / Somebody else was crucified in his place.\n* He went south to Egypt, then took the sea route to India / He went north and took the land route to India\n* He was welcomed back as a Saint / He was instantly recognized as a Holy Man\n* He attracted a large following\n* He died in a cave in the Himalayas. (Kashmir and Bhutan are the most frequently mentioned places.)\n\n3: The Glastonbury tradition.\nMarried Mary of Magdala.  Had one child. After the crucifixion he went, with his wife to Egypt, and then to Glastonbury.  \n\nA variation of this tradition holds that they directly went to Glastonbury, with his wife, in a ship of  Joseph of Aramethia.\n\n4: The South of France tradition\n* Married  Mary of Magdala. \n* They had a daughter --- Sara.\n* After the crucifixion she goes to Egypt, then to the south of France.\nIn one Indian tradition, they go as a couple to Egypt, then they separate, she goes to the South of France, and he goes to India.\nIn one Glastonbury tradition, after she goes to the south of France, she goes to Glastonbury, to be with Joseph of Aramathia, and the rest of Jesus' relatives.\n\nThe Biblical tradition is the only one that has early documents to support it. The other traditions are purely oral, and do not appear to have been known, prior to pilgrimages being incorporated into Christian practice.\n\nAssuming that one of the non-biblical traditions is valid, there only was one child --- a daughter at that.  Any descendants would have anonymously blended into the gene pool.\n\nB: The brothers/half brothers of Jesus\n\nOne tradition holds that Joseph was a widower, when he married Mary.  \nThe other siblings were the children of Joseph and his first (deceased) wife.  \n\nA second tradition holds that the brothers and sisters were cousins.  [This is the doctrine of the holy Roman catholic and Apostolic Church.]\n\nA third tradition holds that the siblings were the children of Joseph and Mary.  [This is the usual viewpoint of Fundamental Christianity.]\n\nSince at least five siblings are named, and several others are referred to,  he would have had several nephews and nieces.  [Jewish tradition at that time more or less equated being married, but childless, with being in a state of sin.] \n\nThose nephews and nieces would have formed a bloodline, which _might_ persist to this day.  Mitigating against the persistence of the blood line, is the dispersion of Jews, plagues, and wars.  The latter two are very effective at prematurely terminating blood lines. [Yes, I know about Genghis Khan, and the dispersion of his genes.  I'll also point out that he was the war leader, spread his gene pool over most of Asia, and killed off most of the competing gene pool donors.  By contrast, the family of Jesus was at the bottom of the social scale and confined to a small country.]\n\nIn synopsis.\nA direct bloodline from Jesus:  No.\nA direct bloodline from his siblings:  Probable.\nAny such descendants would only be identifiable, if DNA from Joseph can be found.  [Genghis Khan's DNA was identifiable, not because of an actual sample, but because the same DNA anomalies occur at the same place over the entire geographic area.  They all point to the same common origin in time.  A period that was when Genghis Khan was alive.   It is theoretically possible that the genes are of somebody other than Genghis Khan. The only other candidates with the geographical range, power, nd influence would be his family, and close relatives. ]