What is the PESTLE theory? in international business?
915759
give me many and Igiv to you shi  ---ups
7903
Check out this article on Links Direct:\n\nhttp://directmag.com/news/marketing_network_holdings_international/index.html
520773
It would be good ole Democracy with two exceptions....There would be laws on profit margins. There would also be heavy tarrifs on imports! This is solely what is causing our economics to go downhill.
259475
Go to: www.findarticles.com.\nEnter: global economy in the search box.\nDoing this search, I came up with more than 1800 articles.
1037991
Most international companies have studies done by outside consultants to substantiate the intergroup markups that they charge on international transactions within the company.  That is the only way to insure that their practices pass the mustard with governmental tax agencies around the world, and yet don't cripple the company's business efforts.
459344
False. If this was how GDP was calculated, 2 firms could infinitely trade products, spending the money they make to buy their products back, and be increasing the GDP. Doesn't matter if you don't understand that, but just remember, FALSE
718285
one doing Business is being state of busyness,doing some transaction with a Aim to get some advantage out of that.\nadvantage may be cash or service any other form of favour except love.\n\nIndustrialisation is doing more produce.\n\nBusiness magnitude is propotioal to Industrialsation within a closed system provided no external input of products.
87039
according to most theorists, no.  They tend to argue that:\n1.) overseas nations are exploited by global corporations\n    *we take their raw materials/use them up for very cheap\n    *we hire their people at extremely low wages\n2.) because of globalization, the gap between the rich and \n    poor is widening\n    *the rich get richer and poor get poorer (we exploit \n     them to make higher profits-the less they make the\n     more we keep)\n3.) I would also add that jobs are taken away from   \n    Americans when factories are moved overseas.\n    *this will hurt our economy b/c we rely on a large \n     middle class of consumers to buy stuff
341302
Work on logic games; that can help with general reasoning. \n\nWhat are you trying to analyze? Work situations? Shipping? Personnel? There's a lot of books and resources, some probably available at your library, that give strategy for various aspects of business. Sorry I can't be more precise, but your question is very broad.
542543
You weren't really specific with the question.\n\nThere are a site that talk about asset protection theory:\nhttp://www.assetprotectiontheory.com/\n\nIt deals with sheltering assets among other things.\n\nYou might also be talking about countries.  Sometimes, countries place tariffs on imports to make domestic goods more desirable.  This might lead to a better industry inside the countries and prevents foreign dumping.  There's more info here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff
1053195
Figuring you are wondering about multinational companies.  Here's the advantage, they can exploit the particular and unique efficiencies of each country they operate in. \n  If they operate in Switzerland, Vietnam and France like Sanofi Pharma, they can utilize the technology of pharm development in Switzerland, test and produce like they do in Vietnam, and utilize the French ability for international distribution.  Each of the nations have a comparative advantage over the others in these processes, where a company only utilizing what one of the countries would suffer the disadvantages of the nation's weakness in a particular area.\n  A darker side of multinationals is the negotiating power that they have that derives from their ability to threaten a nation with leaving if the government does not meet some beneficial demands.  As you can imagine, this is easier in some instance than others.  Easier to threaten a small country than a large.  Easier to make the threat believable if another country offers a viable advantage.\n   One more real advantage, that is under represented in the pop press, is the ability of multinational companies to synthesize and leverage knowledge of the world market to prevent mistaken assumptions or to extrapolate a better understanding of global or even national market trends.  Examples of this are Coca Cola, Nestle, Shell where they use the global mindset of the combined members of their firm to guide it.  Some lousy examples are Ford, John-Deere, where entering a market offers knowledge of a new perspective, but the companies still employ the same policies as before.  Look at their senior management.  John Deere is terrible (great history-ruined), getting eaten alive from Chinese firms, yet top management are are all current and ex-lawyers.  Walmart for example,(better managed) top management are all logisticians.
599217
List the types of thing that your sales and production are dependent on.  What internal and external factors will effect business?\n\nCreate your list without organisation and later you can organise your list. Look for orthogonality (exporting is in my list, what not importing?)\n\nHere my starting list \nLook at competitors  annual reports for factors you should be considering\n\n  directional strategy. \n  sales portfolio analysis. \n  corporate synopsis. \n  franchising.\n  government regulation \n  exporting. \n  licensing. \n  production sharing. \n  how to expand? \n  vertically integrate. \n  horizontally integrate. \n  product fit. \n  market size \n  margin\n  market support\n  cash flow availability \n  product/market segments \n  product consumption rate \n  raw material dependency/labor pool \n  opportunity matrix
544590
See this:\n\nhttp://www.economist.com/theworldin/business/displayStory.cfm?story_id=5149435&d=2006
545240
Sure.  Try these:\n\nhttp://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~rtmoore/GMMC/heckman.pdf\nhttp://www.nottingham.ac.uk/economics/leverhulme/research_papers/05_44.pdf\n\nAnd if those don't help, try this:\n\nhttp://www.google.com/search?num=20&hl=en&lr=lang_en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=%22Heckman+Selection+Model%22&spell=1
13473
Michael E. Porters "Five Forces" has been the de facto standard since the 80's for approaching business strategy:\n\nhttp://www.quickmba.com/strategy/porter.shtml\n\nSubsequent approachs have been adaptations or partial rejections of this approach.  Regardless, if you are going to learn business strategy and analyze opponents well, you should start here.  It will give you context for subsequent learning.
475223
I’ve never studied Economics, so please forgive me if I write something stupid...\n1. What is the reason for globalisation? It’s the needs and the expansion of companies.\n2.  What can be the consequence? Strong interdependence and a lot more. We know from history that a best example what can happen was the Great Depression of the 1930s or the Oil Crisis in the 1970s. In the present news are all about this problem. If there were no duties, the poor areas (Africa, Asia, South America) could either rise or fall even deeper.\n\nThat’s all I can figure out on my own.\nHere’s a more professional aid:
105610
Are you referring to a pestle and mortar?\n\n(The mortar is the vessel)