Is it possible for a Military Transport aircraft....?
927237
It appears that the range is classified, but it can refuel in air anyway, so no, it doesn't need to land to go around the world.  It could, theoretically circumvent the world several times, as long as they had supplies and enough pilots to rotate shifts.
788438
Check Ebay - they even have special categories and tons of stuff airplanes related!
834599
I didn't think the UK was gonna have carriers anymore.  A link to that would be cool.\n\nFound this\n\nhttp://www.naval-technology.com/projects/cvf/
969223
aero zepplin or something like that
117781
Certainly possible in theory. I doubt if anyone has ever done it in practice.\n\n\nRemember that a plane stays up in the air because of the speed that the air moves over its wings, not beceuse of how fast the plane moves relative to the ground. If a plane turns into the wind it can generate the same lift while travelling slower relative to the ground. With a strong enough headwind it is quite possible for a plane to remain stationary and airborne\n\nBut as I said, this is only theoretically possible. I've seen light planes do this and hang-gliders and birds do it all the time. But it would be incredibly dangeorus for a 'passenger flight'. If the wind were to drop, even for amoment, the plane would immediately stall and fall from the sky. It's fairly easy for a light plane or glider to recover from such a stall, but a large commercial passenger craft would find it much harder. There's a good chance it would crash.
436952
Yes they can be. How its flown in relation to the US flag is directed in AR 840-10.
77465
I can't say that I know that, but if you have the time and money, you may be able to purchase military grade at a PX (supply store, one in almost every military fort/base: Fort Sill, Great Lakes Naval Base, etc). Good luck with your flying.
820756
How about looking for a military manual that covers the training for the airborne?\n\nBe sure to include as one of the items "Mental evaluation"....why  anyone would jump out of a perfectly good airplane is beyond me!
100791
Razor definately. They use recylcled aircraft alluminum and are relatively cheap. Here's the web link to get you started. http://razor.com/. Hope this helps. Vote for me! Will.
395868
I don't know what nations military service you were in, but I'd bet they offered training and PPE as well as technical data for maintaining aircraft fuel systems.  \n\nUnless you can prove otherwise, or that you actually used the proper PPE and tech data, you might not have a leg to stand on Bud.
266444
They could travel in shallow water and on up over land. They carry great weight, and they are really really fast as they travel over the water.Some are for civilian use, they used to travel between england and france, and the military still uses them.
1034438
I suppose we could find some sort of clear plexi-glass type of material that would be suitable for aircraft-grade structures, but making the entire plane clear would probably be impossible.  A materials science engineer would probably know more about this.\n\nOne question from me though: is there a need for this?  The stealth bomber, for example, flies so high that visual detection by ground based anti-aircraft emplacements is quite low.  So low, in fact, that I have heard that it has never been fired upon from the ground (don't quote me on that though).  So for modern military aircraft applications, I would say radar invisibility is far more important than visual invisibility.\n\nAs a side note, I had read about a clothing-like light scattering material in either Popular Science or the Spectum magazine (forget which).  Anyway, it somehow bends or scatters light in such a way as to partially reveal what is behind the covered object.  There was a picture of a guy wearing a piece of it, and I was pretty amazed.  It was far from perfect (could still obviously see the guy), but I could imagine it being a very useful camo material if it improves.
345709
umm, i don't think so.  the Abrams tank is one of the most advanced tanks.  Not even bradleys can come close. \nyou will need a A-10 air to ground attack plane to destroy them.
530476
The military does not control airspace.  This would be a local police problem, coordinated with the FAA.
736238
Umm I do not know I have never tried that b-4 but I am sure that you can. You might find it by typing that question on www.ask.com.
549988
Huge and Navy Seal don't go together.\n\nI'm guessing it will be something like this:\nhttp://www.army-technology.com/projects/shadow/\n\nIt has a hybrid electric motor to reduce sound (the only thing you hear is the wheels crunching over the terrain) and it's heat signiture.  It can go 38 km at 50 kph on it's batteries alone. It can go 758 km at 50 kph with fuel.\n\nThis might be a standard military vehical.\nhttp://www.army-technology.com/projects/gvp/
539507
Here's a crazy idea: Type "SU-27 tactics" in the Google search window.\n\nBut here.  I've done it for you.  http://www.saunalahti.fi/~fta/Su-27.htm