Why does Martha Stewart get 2600 answers to her question. Is it because she is an ex con?
917965
I avoid watching her at all costs. Any woman who has time to make a wreath out of dog turds has way too much time on her hands.
856006
read her questions history people before you answer!\n\nSERIOUSLY, READ HER HISTORY OF QUESTIONS, SHE( IF SHE'S A GIRL, WOMAN, MAN, WHO KNOWS) IS MAKING THIS STUFF UP TO GET A RISE OUT OF PEOPLE. \n\nLittle Angel, to answer your question, I think it's ok.
819257
Someone must have a grudge and are reporting your question and answers. I guess that some stupid people enjoy doing that!
1013188
Actually I think he maybe hires people to read it ..lol\nWhen I saw 100 answers to a question then I am impressed so 5112 is amazing, so maybe it is a record.\nIt also could be that thats not Donald Trump after all, but no one has proof. Maybe people are just answering so they can go around and tell people that they answered a question by Donald Trump....\nAnd about the G Book of Records, that would be a pretty strange record (if it is one) but its still a record, so why not...\n:-)
901152
Its a good thing its the media doing the reporting and not anyone on here, you were reported for that, thats so funny, what was the offense, spam? Thats usually what mine are too. \n\nPS Did anyone find out why I am so scared of Pamela Vs  husbands 6digit salary?
966805
she was reported for asking goofy questions on Yahoo Answers ;)\n\nThose Yahoo State Troopers are ruthless.
1039739
Yes,yes, yes.  \n\nYou are going to get a fine example of exactly how closed minded the open minded left is with this question.  \n\nLet's see if a single one actually answers it without some lame *ss comment.\n\nI did not see her recent interviews or read the book to this point.  If it is like her others, it will be filled with well referenced examples so you may check out if you have doubts as to their validity.  \n\nThat makes it about number 9,000,000,000,000 on the liberal best seller list as they have an apparent allergy to facts and obective references.
486828
I answer as many questions as I can thoughtfully, cogently, and with the goal of helping the asker resolve the problem or question, and/or with the goal of pointing out to them that there are flaws in their reasoning.  This is my 235th answer, and none of them have been silly or to "get points."  However, I see quite a few silly questions out there.  I think that it's perhaps because each of us is here participating in Y! Answers for different reasons--some merely for entertainment, and others so that they can have the opportunity to interact with others.
1088798
Not typing their answers clearly and making sure their question is actually READABLE, and understandable.\nI have skipped MANY question, simply because it's not clear what the questionis even about!\nIf they just took the time to think about and read their questions before they post them, to make sure others will understand it, I'm sure there'd be a LOT more replies.
439887
Answer to the question: someone's stuck on the subject.\n\nCaution, topher. Naming someone in Y!Answers can be considered a violation of Terms of Service and could draw an abuse email for chatting, harrassing, or some other category.\n\nI will say that I was able to look up the questions I think you are referring to. I read the headers only, but since all 27 have the word "Mormon" in them there appears to be an obsession.\n\nI don't know the content, not being that interested, but if you feel that there is something that violates community guidelines you can use the abuse process yourself. Just click on "abuse" in one of the questions.\n\nYou will have to choose a category of abuse and it will help if you put in the URLs or headers of all the questions and your reasons for believing they are abusive.\n\nIt's not automatic. A member of the Y!Answers staff will use your report to look the questions over and they may agree or disagree with your reasoning. There is currently a backlog of five days.\n\nHe may be looking for a reaction. That can be dialog or it can be trolling -- seeking to start a flame war. Don't bite. If you have a complaint make a report and move on. Avoid his bait. You're better than that and don't need to form an obsession yourself.\n\nA word to the wise.....
954672
I'd like to know what "reason" they gave you for the deletion. All it takes is one person to not like your answer and boom....you get violated. I tried writing to the YA "power people"....surprise, surprise it doesn't help. Never heard from them.
667442
I posted a few "friendly" questions,and got a lot of wise asss answers!It's like SOME people have nothing better to do than reply with stupid answers while whacking their "weasel",GEEEESH!!
758072
Most of this is Entertainment for Some.  \n\nYou get a few good answers, a lot of crappy ones.\nI know it's annoying!, but what can you expect???
77916
Absolutely not.  Maybe someone went after her, such as filing "report abuse" a lot on her.  Has she contacted yahoo about it?  There's nothing wrong with any of these questions really.  And in comparison to a lot of others these are rated "G", run of the mill every day questions.\n\nIf you need help, my e-mail address is on my profile.  I'll be happy to e-mail yahoo over and over about it.
497874
Some times you attract "admirers" while posting.  They tend to follow you.  You do understand if they have one question you have posted, they can find your profile, and see what you are doing now.  Also one answer, as long as they saved it.\n\nSome of the pointy headed little twerps do that.  I attracted one on the Yahoo Financial boards and it was a pain in the patoot.\n\nEven if you stop doing what was annoying them, they chase you.  With this set up, it is kind of hard to identify them.\n\nSo if you are having problems with that, it probably is not you.  Post back to Yahoo and ask what the problem appears to be with the post the "admirer" is complaining about.\n\nBut it is not random, and it is not the answer community.
345171
He/She does it just to get attention. And sambeaner77, the numbers in deltaqueen's question are the Yahoo! id of the person she is talking about.
872760
She said hortatory, but it's still funny.\n\nI think it's from being in too many meetings with Charlie Rangel.\n\nWhoever just wrote "whor-a-tory," LMHO!  A completely accurate assessment if there ever was one!