2006 election was evidence of voter fraud ?
917638
Excellent point!\n\nI say, now that they are not crying about disenfranchised voters and voter fraud, that the system must now be flawless, right?\n\nThe liberals have now given away their right to ever cry about voter fraud again!\n\n.
774725
If you're talking about voting on reality TV shows, it's not cheating. People choose to vote. Mindless or gullible might be a better description.
830960
If you are writing about the USA, I am impressed that the voters apparently jerked W's chain.\n\nOf course they elected the douche bag in the first place.\n\nMaybe some sort of meritocracy? What do you suggest?
758797
I voted on a diebold machine and felt it was safe and accurate.\n\nHowever, if someone really tried and knew what they were doing, fraud could be an issue with those machines. Better safeguards are needed in the future.
1054599
I do. Electronic voting is a crock.  It should be illegal.  There is no way to truly verify that votes are genuinely counted without a paper backup.  Anything can happen in that computer.  And computers can be easily hacked.  Officials who install electronic voting should be sacked.
948483
I don't know about Democrats, or for that matter Republicans. I can tell you as an Independent that you cannot be taken seriously and your accusations cannot be trusted. Calling the election a fraud before it even occurs makes any points you try to make biased and questionable, just like the boy who cried wolf. You are trying to advance an agenda and lack any viable proof to support your claims. I will remind you that in the last 3 election cycles that the only people convicted of election fraud were Democrats, not Republicans.
821566
The absentee ballots have to be rec'd by tomorrow. There is a press release already written blaming unexpected results on late absentee ballots. Smell something burning?
715483
It is very disconcerting to hear that many of the new voting machines do not give receipts, or copies to the voters, or to anyone else.  If there is a malfunction or fraud, there will be no way to verify the results and there will be no possibility for a recount.  This may cast a big cloud over the election for voters in either party, but especially for the losers.  I don't like that news.
1088372
"You are a liar" is a funny answer..but not a very convincing rebuttle.  \n\n\nI am very concerned, i know the issue, i have read the reasons stated and am troubled.\n\nthe republican apologist, are not concerned with any legitmate voting right.\n\nfor example the election of 2000 where blacks were denied the right to vote.\nnot a peep.\nor in 2004\nwhen 3 million votes were contested by republican opertatives, a large percentage military absentee.\n\nnot a peep about counting votes.\n\n\nas you can see the republican concerns are suspect in the very least and their defenders/ apologist are even more troubling.
645097
It was Bill Clinton, of course. Some people may not want to admit this, but the only reason why Bush became president in 2000 is because his dad's friends on the Supreme Court bench handed him the Oval Office.  Some may argue that Bush won fair and square in 2004, but there is evidence that election fraud may have taken place then, as well. However, since Kerry didn't contest the results, no one talked much about it. Thank you, Diebold!
748393
Stolen elections , voter abuse only seem to happen when the Repubs win.  This one seemed complaint free.
906626
From NBC's Lisa Daniels\nPennsylvania's Republican Party says it has filed an official complaint with the state government, alleging failures in voting machines. One aide to Republican Sen. Rick Santorum just told me they believe "hundreds" of votes are affected by these machine malfunctions.\n\nThe complaint claims that votes for Santorum were not counted - that they were either met with a "malfunction" signal or incorrectly cast as votes for Democratic challenger Bob Casey. Santorum's aides say they are waiting for an official response from the state.\n\nThe response from Casey's campaign? The Democrats say there is no evidence of voting problems, aside from one or two isolated incidents unrelated to Santorum's claims. One said privately that the complaints were "an early attempt to explain away a Casey victory."\n\nMeanwhile, the Santorum camp contends that the most commonly cited polls, showing Casey with a double-digit lead over Santorum, are inaccurate. "Get ready for his grassroots campaign to kick in ... and we will win," one campaign official said. \n\nCasey's folks say they are very happy with the voter turnout, especially in the Philly suburbs. Stay tuned...
262273
I can't believe the winner got 95% of the vote.  That seems very unlikely. Its probbly fraudulent.
1150308
Yes. Al Gore was cheated out of the presidency as was Kerry. Now they know how to rig the voting machines so there is no paper trail so they will win every time. It is disgusting.
933179
I'm not suprised, voter fraud is a signature move of the Democratic Party.
364565
You've got a lot of things right here.  For example people ARE too caught up in their materialistic life.  So they don't bother to verify the information they receive and only THINK they know what is going on.  If your information comes from television, you probably know a lot about everything, but what you know has nothing to do with the truth.\nClinton is a liar and a person with few if any morals.  He murdered people in Africa and in Europe with missles and bombs.  It took people's attention away from a sexual scandal that only a generation ago would have finished him as a politician.  A public lie used to be taken seriously, as it should be.\nAs for voting for Bush, how could you think of voting for Gore if he was endorsed by a liar, if the truth about his tobacco money was out, if...? Well, you failed again to find out enough.\nAnd election reform?  During your lifetime much more voting fraud results from the use of machines than from hand ballots!  And Gore is the first American candidate for president capable of damaging his country in an attempt to fraudulently win an election.  You again have BELIEVED what you heard and/or read, you haven't verified and learned.\nAll governments waste money, Bush has made serious mistakes...but he has also turned a scared, paralyzed country into a dynamic, functioning one again.  And so unscared that the biggest cowards are lining up to criticize the policies that have made them feel safe enough to speak up again.\nImpeachment is a serious business.  A country cannot function if its president is challenged continuously.  It certainly can't be a process that begins each time the least informed public opinion is demanding it.\nIf not one person you spoke to voted for Bush, I strongly suggest you get out and meet more people.\nDon't ya think?\nAnd stop thinking yourself a commoner, you are a free citizen of what is still the best functioning democracy in the Western world, in large part thanks to the election of George W. Bush.  Use that freedom, do some reading, and talking, and thinking...and stop being USED by the people with money and influence who control too much of what you see and hear!
773659
Ugh, yes.\n\n\nI recently moved counties and had to re-register. I followed the information listed on my voter's registration card today--to a defunct polling location. It was a high school that is completely under construction--there was no voting going on there at all. Funny that there wasn't a sign or anything directing people to the right place--I had to call 411 to connect with the voter registration office, was on hold for twenty minutes, finally found out my correct polling location--went to vote, mentioned they might want to put a sign up at the other location. They said they had sent out a mailing detailing the new polling location and all eligible voters had received it. Hmmm. . . funny. Not this registered voter. I stuck with it until I found out where I was supposed to vote--but I have no doubt that other people just went back home. \n\n grrrrr.