Why do they have to kill the fetuses that are being aborted in such a cruel way?  Why can't they just.........
930059
aborting is not crual in anyway [unless your aborting it like at 7 months pregnant...as if you DIDNT HAVE THE TIME TO DECIDE SOONER???] anyway, putting them to "sleep" is just as "crual" because your still stopping it from its goal: becoming a human adult. abortion is actually better if the mother doesnt even want the baby. why would you want to grow up with a mother who never wanted you or still doesnt want you? or why would you want a child to be parentless and sent off to a orphanage? you may get foster parents but that still sucks! and not every child gets adopted. a child should be born when he/she is WANTED in the first place or else they might not recieve all the love and care they deserve.
191214
See abortion.  Somehow the courts decided this issue and the states were left with their mouths agape.  One can blame the national government for not having the intestinal fortitude when it came to abortion.  That's what one gets when we elect gutless lawmakers.
824462
I agree with you that abortions are wrong. I strongly believe that it is cruel and takes away the life of a child. Everyone should have the right to live and I believe it is selfish of someone to take away a child's entire life because they don't want 9 months of suffering. If they can't take care of the child there is always adoption. To those who say that a women should have the right to chose, what about the unborn child, shouldn't he have some rights or at the very least the right to live. Now this is also disapproved by religion as it goes against the 10 commandments as so forth but it is more then that, its a matter of love and selflessness, its morality and common sense. Abortion is murder and murder is wrong.
1101171
I am not anti-choice but, I really don't like abortion either. The decision should be the women's and whoever she slept with (If he is around) - not the government, churches, president or some televangelist scam artist. There is a reason a fetus is not called a baby; Babies are born. A fetus is a potential life and no more  alive than a tumor. We don't give the death penalty to doctors for removing tumors. (Thank god)\n\nMy answer is: NO
66978
They should not be allowed to have an abortion unless it is to save the life of the mother. I understand accidents happen but practice safe sex and if you still get pregnant give it up for adoption. Killing your own baby in an effort to ease the problems in you life is sick and wrong. It is a sad reflection on our society that we have made this discusting act into a simple procedure like getting a tooth pulled.\nFurthermore why is the biological father not a part of this choice.\nThese pro baby murder wack jobs have just gone to far. Then they have the nerve to call it pro choice! The choice was made when you decided to have sex. Unborn children should recieve the same protection as any other citizen.\nI like your question.\nHowever it damn near has my blood boiling. I have both a daughter and a son. The fact that there are doctors out there that would do this without my consent to my child is discusting. I find it hard to believe the liberals have led this country that I love so much down a path of disolving morals.
230695
I think its sick.No matter what the person did to deserve it.I think its shameful that America actively participates in it when we are one of the only countries that does.Abortion is so called murder but they actually strap someone down and kill them with the death penalty. I don't understand how some one can justify the death penalty but in the same breath speak of how cruel and horrible abortion is.I think until the legal system and investigations into the crime are completely fool-proof and without any error then I think it should not be carried out. How many people are innocent and become imprisoned?
366890
I agree.\n\nIt's also ironic because they want to kill innocent babies, but they don't want to execute deserving killers and rapists.\n\nI'm not sure how their minds work.
855754
They simply reject any ideation that the unborn IS a HUMAN BEING and ignore the rights of the unborn.  You will hear them equate the child to a parasite, blob of cells, or any other term that de-humanizes the infant, so killing is somehow sanitized.  No problem.  No worries.  The Nazis did the same thing to the Jews preceding and during the Holocaust.\n\nI somehow am inclined to believe if the Liberals could figure out a way to secure votes from the fetuses voting block for the DNC, the fetuses might be able to save themselves, but they can't.
492044
It blows my mind how people can be anti-capital punishment and pro-abortion.\n\nEither respect all life, or respect all innocent life, but not the liberal "don't kill convicted murders, but kill all the babies you want".\n\nBTW - to the person below... the Bible does NOT say "Thou Shall Not Kill"... it says "Thou Shall Not Committ Murder."  There is a difference.
435055
I agree. I find it interesting that it is okay to abort a fetus while it is in the womb but not when it is out of the womb. This makes no sense to me. It seems to me that if it is  to be legal then parents should be allowed to have an abortion up until the fetus is 18 years old.
266546
Abortion is murder, you are killing a life (the fetus IS alive at the MOMENT of conception). Abortion is the must DISGUSTING thing ever.\n\n1) why should we punish the child, it was NOT the child's fault it was born\n2) With sex comes responsibilities, and if you're going to engage, you BETTER be willing to pay (whether it means adoption, giving up your life for theirs, what ever the consequence is- you better be ready.)\n3) From the moment of conception it has its own DNA coding, therefore it's tech. not the "women's body", the only thing the women is doing is housing and feeding it.\n4) The two participating had the choice whether or not they were ready to deal with the consequences so why give them more choices if they're already making bad ones?\n5) rape, I sympathise greatly, but why punish the child? it's not the child's fault, yes it is a HUGE burden and COSNTANT reminder, but still- from a political perspective it's all or nothing, if it were up to me those who were raped (politically) would have the choice (religion in there there would be no rape or abortion- but that's not life). If I were raped though I would definately keep the child though. But in politics it's all or nothing.\n6) There is ALWAYS adoption- if you're willing to kill a child, why are you worried about its life in an adoption agency???\n7) We are not God, we do not have the right to say who lives and who dies. \n8) From the moment of conception it IS alive.(to be alive it has to fill 4 criterias, (1) metabolism, (2) growth, (3) reaction to stimuli, and (4) reproduction)\n9) It's either pro-life or pro-death, not pro-choice because where is that child's choice? and the oppisite of life is death and that's what they are saying is good- the right to put a child to death- YAY!!! hah not!\n\nI see NO plausible defense for this abomination at all.
64187
You can't abort a baby after 12 weeks because that's when the baby starts to be able to feel things.  Before then their nervous system isn't advanced enough.  I understand your frustration, and yes the baby does have rights too which is why you can't abort after 3 months.  I have to say I agree with pro-choice.  I would much rather have unfit parents not go through with the pregnancy.  In addition, I feel rape victims should not have to go through with a pregnancy that would remind them for 9 months of a horrible act against them.  It's a case by case thing.  Just because it isn't right for you doesn't mean you can take away someone else's rights.  I would not personally do it, but I feel others have the right to choose.
1118108
Morning after pill, second that motion.\nOh! Isn't this still considered an abortion by some extremist Christians?  Who cares about them?  \nThey are going to hell along with the rest of the extremist racist bigots.
1165760
A fetus is alive since the minute it is conceived. There for for it is a life at an early stage.  It is not a woman's choice to kill but it is a woman's choice to give that child to a couple who does not have to blessing of conceiving there on child. It is not the fetus(childs)fault so he/she should not pay for this. Now is certain situations where the mother was abused there are many other options for that baby. Every baby has the right to live and no one but God can make that choice.
1134660
yeah, but answer this....if a woman was raped, should she be forced to give birth to the child of her rapist and have that constant reminder? that is the truly sick thing in this situation. and even if it was just a highschool girl who did an irresponsible thing.....why ruin her life AND the life of her unborn child?? i am totally and completely prochoice, and believe that abortion should absolutely be legalized.
905174
Abortion is the killing of an unborn child! It's not a lifeless blob. That makes little to no sense at all. If you put a woman and a man together, they're not going to create a blob. They're gonna create a CHILD, which is what a fetus is. If one says ' I cant care for the child.....I have work school etc', adoption is a good answer. For the kids concieved in rape, it's not the childs fault who the father is. I feel for the mother and the baby.... But truly, it's a horrible horrible crime and should be stopped.
201257
Because christian fundamentalists don't like the idea of innocent fetuses dying.  \n\nThey are cool with the fact of innocent adults dying in war called "collateral damage" or innocent adults on death row dying with the rationale that "God will sort them out."\n\nAs you can see it is complete BS rationalizations but that's life and politics.