how to imagine more than 3dimensions!?
926992
Well, isn't that what we're doing right now?  Traveling through time?  Living in the 4th dimension as it were?
603543
Try this open source 3D engine.  It's open source, so it's free:   http://www.ogre3d.org/
600049
The three dimensions they are most likely talking about are the x,y, and z planes in space. Time is the fourth dimension, and there could be more after that. read stephen hawkings book A Brief History of Time. He explains how to conceptualize dimensions in your head very well.
35663
This one is great ... \nhttp://3dlinks.com/links.cfm?categoryid=13&subcategoryid=105
308481
Visualize it going further.\nTell yourself it'll go 70, or 75'.\nIf you dream it, you can achieve it.
592848
Basically, the space that you and I experiences daily is 3 dimensions: up/down, left/right, forward/backwards. But space doesn't have to be 3 dimensions. It can be any number of dimensions. Of course, it is very difficult for us 3-dimensional beings to imagine what these dimensions are, or where they are. The problems is that we can NEVER see the fourth spatial dimension, never mind the 5th or the 6th, etc. etc. Let me explain why.\n\nImagine for a moment that we are 2-d beings, not 3-d. And we live on the surface of a sphere (like a ballon). This sphere is our universe. Everything we see, touch and experience happens on the surface of this sphere. We can go left/right and forward/backwards. But we can never go up or down. When we travel in one direction, we will eventually circumnavigate the sphere and make a complete circle, which brings us back to the initial starting point. If we ask the 2-d beings to imagine 3-dimensional space, all we can tell them is that the 3rd dimension (up/down) is orthogonal (a fancy way of saying perpendicular) to the surface of the sphere.\n\nThis is exactly our situation when we talk about the 4th, 5th, 6th, whatever nth dimension. They are defined as the dimension that is orthogonal to the n-1 th space. So the 4th dimension is orthogonal to our 3-dimensional space, and the 5th dimension is orthogonal to the 4-dimensional space, etc. etc.\n\nNow about Super String Theory and these higher dimensions: what the theory predicts is that our universe does indeed have more than 3 spatial dimensions. Some version sof the theory say there are 10, some say there are 11. Whatever the number (it doesn't really matter in our discussion here), these higher spatial dimensions are currently curled up into very very tiny spaces. So what does that mean?\n\nWe now go back to our 2-d being living on a sphere example. For the time being, let's say we are now on a flat 2-dimensional surface (like a sheet of paper). Super String Theory says that the higher dimensions are curled up. So let's consider in our case the 3rd dimension as the curled up dimension. This means that if we were to magnify any point on the 2-d surface all the way to about 10^-35 meters (Planck Length), we will see that there is a tiny loop (like a loose thread on a knitted sweater).\n\nNow imagine if our 2-d being were (1) small enough to see and fit inside the loop, and (2) able now to travel in the 3rd dimension, then for it to go in the up/down direction, the 2-d being will now be just going around in circles inside the loop. Remember in the previous case, our 2-d being can travel in one direction on the surface of the sphere and then return to the same point. Well, here our 2-d being is traversing through the 3rd dimension, except that there is no up and down because the 3rd dimension is "curled up" into a loop. So the 2-d being just goes around the loop in circles.\n\nIf you understood the above, then now we can answer the question, what and where are these higher dimensions in our universe. They are culred up in every point in our 3-dimensional space, and if we were small enough and we could move into these higher dimensions, then we would be moving through these very convoluted curled up loops, but not really able to go anywhere.\n\nBecause these higher dimensions are curled up into such tiny tiny loops (remember 10^-35 meters), only the most elementary structures like "strings" are affected by them. The size of these strings are of course on the order of 10^-35 meters long, and can traverse through the curl up dimensions. When the strings vibrate, the vibrations in the 3 large dimensions don't have any effect, but in the curled up higher dimensions, the vibrations can create resonance like playing a musical note.\n\nThese resonances are the stuff of reality, meaning these vibrational resonances of the strings inside the curled up dimensions is what creates matter and energy and thus everything that&#
182640
I'm not sure if this is what you're asking, but if...\nd = length\nd-3 = width\n\nthen the area is d(d-3), a.k.a. d^2 - 3d .\n\nHope this helps!
191332
Find the dementions and multiply.
189752
sphere, cube, pyramid, cilinder
706278
I know four dimensions: x, y, z\ntime is the fourth\n\nBut in addition, theories such as string theory predict that the space we live in has in fact 11 dimensions, but that the universe measured along these additional dimensions is subatomic in size. As a result, we perceive only the three spatial dimensions that have macroscopic size
471213
It all dependend where you are filling time. In an insane intitution there are people who experience 4 ,5 of more dimentions . so far I have heard of 26 dimensions being filled including many dimentions of time.\nSpace and time have the same thing in common they can be filled both at the same instance!
370895
just use 3d max 8...since u already to how to use all function in 3d max.\n\nI personally used 3d max 7.5, solid work, and maya 7...still learning!!
23789
technically, a klein bottle is only realizable in 4 dimensions, so you cannot make a complete physical representation of one in three-dimensional space.  \n\nit can, however be projectively mapped to three dimensions through a mathematical procedure called an immersion, just like a three dimensional object can be mapped to two dimensions when you take a photograph of it.  this three-dimensional projection is what you can see if you do a google image search for 'klein bottle', and physical models can be made.  it's a bit like a three-dimensional moebius strip.  however, these are not a true representation of the object.
207128
4th dimension is easy, since it's time.  Just imagine something moving in a 3d volume and you're imagining four dimensions, x,y,z and t.\n\nYou can imagine an object moving in five dimensions or more pretty easily, too.\n\nImagine two three dimensional volumes, one is x, y, z, the other is x, y, w.   Now imagine a point moving along a line in each volume, such that if the point is folowing some equation f(x,y,z,w,t) the x,y,z volume is tracking its coordinates in x,y,z and the x,y,w is tracking its coordiates over time in x,y,w.  You need to keep them coordinated in your head, which can be tricky, but if you get good at it you can also imagine rotating one or both 3d volume about any given axis and keep tracking the point.  So, you can rotate x,y,z into x,y,w, or z,y,w, or whatever, while still imagining the motion of the point.  And, there you are, imagining five dimensions simultaneously.   You can do this for any number of dimensions, keeping track of them via rotation of basis and/or multiple 3d volumes, but it gets a little tricky, sort of like keeping two or three songs running in your head at the same time, but with practice it can be done.   I can successfully keep track of up to eight dimensions this way with ease, any more than that takes serious concentration.  It can be trickier if using non-euclidian volumes, but in some cases, like the small curled dimensions used in string theory, it can actually be easier than dealing with many large dimensions.
659736
Not a site, but I suggest you invest in something called Mathcad.\nTeach, please note, it is a site not a sight! Unless you were 'looking' for the answer... sorry!
16690
Try analogy especially for math. Or do it with illustrations.
196800
Surface area. Seriously. 8D