how do you put the word alleged in a sentence?
926749
The alleged murderer could not be located for questioning. \n\nThe alleged cure-all produced no results when it was tested by reputable doctors.
606973
Context is what conveys the meaning of a sentence.  Taking a sentence out of its proper context is deceitful and underhanded.\n\nConsider the following.\n\nI am a murderer.  I killed a man who broke into my house and held a gun to my wife's head.\n\nIf you only read the first sentence, out of context, you would have a different opinion of me.\n\n\nFor other examples, watch ANY policial campaign commercial.   Many of the lies in those commercials come in the form of quotes taken out of context.
912999
Because the sentence structure police will get you. But really as long as it is in informal conversation it is ok. In business documents or something for school it better be correct.
255598
It depends on what the sentence is talking about.  \n\nFor example, if your original sentence says "James Mitchell is the instructor of the class." the revised sentence can be "James Mitchell instructs the class."\n\nWithout more detail, I can't suggest any verbs in particular.
266425
You have to look at the entire pleading in context.  Unless the pleading is verified under penalty of perjury, none of the allegations can be grounds for perjury.  Furthermore, you need to look at the specific nature of the allegations and the qualifiers.  If the declaration alleges something based on "information and belief" as opposed to personal knowledge, that doesn't support a charge of perjury if determined to be false.  Finally, the phrase "believes and avers" might have a specific meaning under the laws of your state that might be unique.
471440
Since it is not proper to use first or second tense in an essay, you could say "the author."  Be sure to back up your opinions with facts or research.
746717
verb:   prove to be false or incorrect \nverb:   overthrow by argument, evidence, or proof
742358
Some of these aren't quite right, but it's a little difficult to know how to correct them without seeing more of the context. \n\n1. The word "evaluated" does not work here. Maybe start with, "According to the evaluation, the total surface..."\n2. You need the article "a" in front of "covering. " "Was used as a covering..." I am not sure "covering" is the right word, but I don't know that much about interior decorating terminology. \n3. Fine. \n4. Not sure what you mean by work "field" but otherwise okay. \n5. You should say, "in the purchasing" instead of "for the purchasing." \n6. Not sure if this okay; would need to know more. \n7. Fine.\n8. Rewrite: "Two years after the paint had been used, toxic gases radiated from the paint."\n9. The "views" can't "advise." Only people can advise. \n10. The word "disrupted" is not right here. I am not sure what you are trying to say here. \n11. I would move the word "analyzed" to after "brands," but otherwise this is fine.
309933
Best way I can think of is this:\n\nRepresenting something to be factual when it is not in order to gain something by doing so.\n\nOr simply, obtaining something under false pretense.
836525
Did Saddam Hussein do anything wrong against the US? Why is the US happy about his execution?\n\nThere are many ways this sentence could have been worded. \n\nIn the first sentence, "done" is the incorrect word.  "Did Saddam Hussein do anything wrong...?"\n\nIn the second sentence, "on" would be better replaced with "about". The word "is" should come between "then" and "why".
405114
Here we go...in its most common usage, it's a prepositon but read below, pasted in from www.dictionary.com\n__________________________________________________________\n\n4 entries found for except.\nex·cept    ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (k-spt)\nprep. \nWith the exclusion of; other than; but: everyone except me. \n\nconj. \nIf it were not for the fact that; only. Often used with that: I would buy the suit, except that it costs too much. \nOtherwise than: They didn't open their mouths except to complain. \nUnless: “And ne'er throughout the year to church thou go'st/Except it be to pray against thy foes” (Shakespeare). \n\nv. ex·cept·ed, ex·cept·ing, ex·cepts \nv. tr.\nTo leave out; exclude: An admission fee is charged, but children are excepted. \n\nv. intr.\nTo object: Counsel excepted to the court's ruling. \n\nIdiom:\nexcept for\nWere it not for: I would join you except for my cold. \n\n\n--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n[Middle English, from Latin exceptus, past participle of excipere, to exclude  : ex-, ex- + capere, to take; see kap- in Indo-European Roots.] \nUsage Note: Except in the sense of “with the exclusion of” or “other than” is generally viewed as a preposition, not a conjunction. Therefore, a personal pronoun that follows except should be in the objective case: No one except me knew it. Everyone had a ticket except her. \n\n[Download Now or Buy the Book] \nSource: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition\nCopyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.\nPublished by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. \n\n\nMain Entry: ex·cept\nPronunciation: ik-'sept\nFunction: transitive verb\n: to take or leave out (as from insurance coverage or a deed) : EXCLUDE <specifically excepted the air carriers and unions from the provisions —M. A. Kelly> intransitive verb : OBJECT; especially : to file a bill of exceptions or make a formal exception <excepted to the judge's order> \n\n\nSource: Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law, © 1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc. \n\n\nexcept\n\nv 1: take exception to; "he demurred at my suggestion to work on Saturday" [syn: demur] 2: prevent from being included or considered or accepted; "The bad results were excluded from the report"; "Leave off the top piece" [syn: exclude, leave out, leave off, omit, take out] [ant: include]\n\n\nSource: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University \n\n\nexcept\n\nexcept: in CancerWEB's On-line Medical Dictionary
797489
curious phrase, it sounds ridiculous. you need a context.
1046936
I would do it like this:\n\nperson 1: blabbity\nperson 2: blah\n\nJust do two lines with person 1 at the top and person 2 on the bottom.  Do it one sentence at a time.  It might be tedious, but that's the best way I can think of to give your friend full access to what is going on.
1146119
Associate each word with a "root word" on the meaning of the word. Then go through the whole list and see if you can associate each term with the "root word" you chose. Then associate the "root word" with the rest of the meaning.\n\nFor example:\nIrony - The use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning. \n\nI will choose the word "opposite" from the meaning, since it is the word that mostly characterize the word "irony"\n\nHence, I will study: "Irony - Opposite"\n\nThen, once I am good at associating each of the words I need to study, I add the rest of the meaning. Mostly, if you remember the associated word, it will give you hints on the rest of the meaning.
553324
just get rid of the John and if the sentence makes sense use it\nfor example\nJohn and me went to the store.\nnot right\nbecause me went to the store makes no sense.\nJohn and I went to the store is correct.\n\nbut you would say me if it was the direct object of a verb. for example, the car hit john and i is incorrect,\nbecause the car hit i is gibberish.  the car hit me is correct. so the car hit john and me is correct.
145390
Yes.\n\nIt's used in the sentence that you posed as a question.
490663
someone and I.\n\nI'll use a name for an example.  Rob and I went to the store.  If you take "rob" out of the sentence, it still makes sense so its right.  It would be "I went to the store"