Why India' share of the world' trade is much less than China?
917478
I think you ignore the fact that India exports a lot of services (outsouced jobs, anyone?) and services usually don't come with a "made in India" tag. Inida contribute to world trade through its human capital, and in the 21st century it will be a major driving force.
606534
hmm wht to say,a population of 1billion\none or other will be online sometime,i donno wht happend to  counterparts chinese,india has more acess to internet than them in asia due to good english skills,i think\nso thz r reasons:1.large group of internet users\n                 2.gd english skills\n                 3.thz iz daytime thr unlike in america&europe,latin america...\n                 4.many r yahoo users comparingly less google,msn users
471292
yes.. the truth is that china appears to be stable on the surface but is chaotic beneath and india appears to be chaotic on the surface but is stable beneath. infact are growth rate is increasing steadily and with India being one of the it super powers there is a bright future ahead.
504337
Given the fact "trade rules" are created and implemented by the wealthiest nations (G8), it is highly unlikely poorer nations will derive any direct benefit from those rules.\n\nIf "free trade" was "fair trade," it might be possible; but it isn't, so it isn't.
969630
India's population actually accounts for 1/6th of the world population. That figure isn't actually an encouraaging one, is it?
650573
due to partitioning india is divided in there countires, pakistan, india and bangladesh.\n\nif these countries were not partitioned there must be United States of India, more powerful than china. and the second super power after United Stated of America.
1157589
India is Asian country
719417
India's world image is shaped less by India's political leadership than it is by images of millions of poor people living in shacks, starving, and otherwise meeting the criteria for "third world nation" status.\n\nIt seems to be more related to overpopulation than politics.\n\n(overpopulation = more people than the local economy can support)
107224
Unlikely, because as these two countries become more industrialized the growing strain on workd esources will snap and send us into a nasty depression. \n\n  The price of steel is astronomical right now, making it difficult on the oil companies, pushing up the price of oil. With all of the new construction in India and China, what other possible outcome is there? Perhaps a world war to stay off global starvation?
366622
In an article written by David Sims, he notes he'd lay his money on India, not China, to be the Next Great Thing. He write, "The three main reasons, of course, are that India is \na) a widely Anglophone democracy operating under the rule of law, \nb) serious about protecting property and intellectual rights, and \nc) highly entrepreneurial. \n\nChina is none of those nor ever will be, and you can’t name a significant long-term world economic power in the last hundred years who’s not at least two out of those three."\n\n Does anyone remember that China is still a communist country with a dismal human rights record? Remember? Communism? Chairman Mao and all?\n\nIndia is a democratic nation. It operates under English Common Law. Its court system makes sense to Westerners. It likes us. \n\nIn terms of call centers...you think your customers can't understand Indian agents? Do you really believe that Chinese agents are going to be an improvement? How, exactly?\n\nWhat if the political situation between the U.S. and China (always touchy) deteriorates in the next 10 years? What's going to happen to U.S. investments there? You think you'll get them back?\n\nThings to think about.
142079
Japan is more intimately tied to the fluctuations in the U.S. economy, where China, though a large trader with the U.S., would not be hurt, if for instance, the NASDAQ plummeted overnight.  One way in which China wields much more authority in world trade than Japan is its substantial investment in energy sources.  One could also make an argument for the political difference.  Where Japan is only interested in dominating economically, China is a global political force to be reckoned with.  Its assimilation of Tibet, its hositility towards liberalism, and its demands on Taiwan are examples of its overly aggressive nature.
100888
It depends on the nation. If labor is relatively abundant in that country, then free trade would tend to increase the wages. If it is relatively scarce (as in the U.S. it is scarce relative to capital) then it will tend to decrease wages.\n\nBecause which ever factor is relatively abundant in that nation (labor or capital) then that is the factor in which the country will specialize in a free trade situation. So Since the U.S. has more capital relative to labor, we will tend to specialize in capital intensive goods, and therefore wage rates will go down.\n\nBut in a country where labor is relatively abundant, like China or India maybe, free trade will increase wages because they will tend to focus on the goods which are relatively labor intensive.\n\n\nPeople seem to get all upset about wage rates going down, when in fact we consumers are losing way more money due to tariffs and other trade barriers than labor is losing in wages. The reason we keep the barriers is because labor is much more organized than the group 'consumers' are. The costs of barriers on cosumers is higher than the benefits to workers. But the costs are spread out over a wide group of people, so we don't notice it as much.
182215
NOT in the first half. In the latter half maybe. Indias GDP rises at about 7% every year. Whereas, America's at 1.7%. However, the major difference is: In America with a GDP of for instance 1000, it will be 1017. Whereas, in India the GDP will be 100 and be 107 in the next year. Now you figure out for yourself. I see China as the Country of the Century.
776040
CHINA CAN NOT BE THE FRIEND OF INDIA AS POLITICALLY GEOGRAPHICALLY AND ECONOMICALLY.
368610
because americans underpay china to make them...that's why a lot of products and services get outsourced...it's cheaper on the company
518574
Technicallt they call it Transmission and distribution loss (T&D loss) It may be around 30% in India.
604684
i would say look at china they are trying to become more capalistic in their economy and its working out really well for them, plus they have one of the fastest growing economies along with India.