How come Bush posted detailed plans on how to build nuclear weapons on the internet?
922853
You mean apart from the fact that he is a war mongering cretin that needs to be put out to pasture before he involves the entire globe in terrorist reprisals?\n\nHe isn't the sharpest tool in the box - never was - but his many advisers usually help prevent him making a TOTAL ar** of himself - mostly. \n\nAdmittedly they panic when he does his little walk-about talk abouts - as he relies on his own wit rather than pre-prepared speeches. It tends to get a little wobbly then.\n\nI'm sorry but asking WHY to ANYTHING to do with bush is a bit pointless. The guy isn't half sharp.
148444
http://www.boreme.com//boreme/funny-2004/m-bush-sovereignty-p1.php   \n\nThe above is for your entertainment (you need Quicktime) and also if you go to www.boreme.com and type BUSH into the Find engine in the top right hand corner you will get some movies, pics and texts that he has said. \n\nHope this helps.
1180638
Keep watching CNN Skippy, they'll give you everything your tiny liberal mind needs to know in convenient thimble-sized servings.  The media is upset because they forced the Intelligence Committee to review the Pentagons findings and sure enough they found some.  Why is anyone surprised?  Where are the industrial centifuges capable of enriching uranium that "disappeared" under the noses of the U.N. Atomic and Weapons inspectors.\n\nWhy don't whiny liberals want to know the truth and why do they get upset when they find out they were wrong?
121208
The Bush administration wasn't able to connect the dots because they had their heads up their asses. I think he sat back and didn't think it would actually happen. He might not have known the exact date and locations but I think he knew more than he is letting on and is afraid for the real truth to come out...
400726
I don't know about the best, but I've heard a funny one.  To paraphrase, "a hacker has gained control of satellites and is beaming down mind control rays"...then the guy went on to post 'evidence' of this being true (like Bush writing his not asking if it was okay to use the restroom).  The sad part is, this guy was being serious.  See source link for his full description of what he thinks is happening.
234357
It certainly does sound like wmd's. Recently, an Iraqi officer who served Saddam has acknowledged that a stock pile of WMD's were sent to Syria prior to the US invasion of Iraq. As I understand it, civilian air liners were gutted and the planes were used as transport vehicles to move all WMD out before the US found them.  Naturally, this didn't get a lot of press because the opponents of the war would lose momentum, plus they would be forced to acknowledge that President Bush was right all along.
395885
dreamer (above) that website is pure bull.  It is a typical liberal website that makes accusations and does not provide any evidence of backing it up.\n\nWhy don't you people start researching things for yourselves and stop believing people like Michael Moore without looking into them.  You will find these leftist liberal socialists are lying to you.\n\nPeople like Sean Hannity, and Rush give you sources which you can verify.  The website you posted has nothing but biased opinions with no facts behind them other than their hatred for Bush.\n--\n\nwyldfire (above) , do you think Bush 'fooled' all these people into believing Iraq had WMD?  Did Bush have a master plan, even before he was in office, to convince all the following liberals that Iraq had WMD?  And furthermore, why would all these liberals believe Bush.  They seem to disagree with anything he has to say.  Check out this link:\nhttp://www.davidstuff.com/political/wmdquotes.htm
951658
Alex, excellent question!! All of you who insist this is Bush's war, please explain the following:\n\n"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998. \n\n"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."  President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998. \n\n"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." \nMadeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998. \n\n"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."  -  Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 \n\n"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." \n    Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998. \n\n"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."  \nRep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998. \n\n"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."  \nMadeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999. \n\n"There is no doubt that... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." \n    Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001. \n\n"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." \n    Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002. \n\n"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." \n    Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002. \n\n"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." \n    Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002. \n\n"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is using and developing weapons of mass destruction." \n    Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002. \n\n"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." \n    Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002. \n\n"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."\n    Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002. \n\n"There is unmistakable evidenc
1161809
"Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons." --President Bush, Sept. 12, 2002\n\n"The Iraqi regime possesses and produces chemical and biological weapons. It is seeking nuclear weapons." --Bush, Oct. 7, 2002\n\n"Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of Sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent." --Bush, Jan. 28, 2003\n\n"The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program." --Bush, Oct. 7, 2002\n\nI've read the story, as well as similar stories on ABCNews and USA Today. The finding of around 500 warheads from before 1991, when he was allowed to possess these weapons, is a moot point. I thought we were looking to stop his continuing of his weapons program. All we've done is proved he had a weapons program 15 years ago, which we already knew.
877696
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/110306K.shtml\n\nI didn't think anyone could be that crazy, but apparently the Republican majority required the Admin. to publish facts regarding pre-war intelligence to prove (politically) that Saddam had WMD's...and some fool put that info on the net in Arabic
878256
And here is a book put out by those who have come up with the plan of action......by the way Bush was instrumental in organizing this commission.\n\nGo down on the left to the PDF link to read it yourself.....\n\n(((("nonalcoholic2", there is your proof, if you care to read it.))))
186578
NO president sold nuclear secrets.  We may have sold technology to countries, but our secret stuff has to be stolen to be betrayed.  I doubt we sold nuclear technology to China.\n\nChina has been working on nukes for years, and had advanced capabilities before Clinton came into office.\n\nI vote Republican, so I am not playing favoritism here.
1170679
Another provocative question from Nicholas "meathead" Rage. Liberals as you call us are not quick to defend that piece of sh't, we just want our leaders to thoroughly think out any military operation regardless of reason. The cowboy Bush mentality (shoot first ask questions later) has cost us thousands of our "kids" lives and for what? Meanwhile North Korea is testing  long range missles that could hit Alaska or Hawaii, Good job Georgie Boy, we feel much safer now.
934878
I saw it here on the New York Post.\n\nhttp://www.nypost.com/seven/11022006/news/nationalnews/gis_drop_smart_bomb_on_kerry_nationalnews_todd_venezia_in_n_y____and_ian_bishop_in_washington.htm
266742
nuclear weapons and bush for a president
686532
There are no strings. Bush has a little box he wears under his suit. Cheney and Rove send him the answers that way. It was clearly visible during the debates.
259931
Thanks for the site!!\n\nFor all my Christian friends, I voted on the GW Bush job rating.  Somehow all those other people voted with me that our little Christian Prez doesn´t cut the mustard anymore.\n\nToday also blogged that Saddam had to tell his top generals that he didn´t have WMD so that he couldn´t destroy the Americans while they were still unloading.\n\nOnly he and Bush Jr. knew for sure that he wouldn´t be using non-existant WMD.  Maybe, Cheney and James Dobson.  His generals and Condi were expecting to see mushroom clouds.\n\nthanks again