what is the difference between AAC and eAAC+?
929494
I hope this helps.\nHE-AAC\n\nHigh Efficiency AAC is a lossy data compression scheme for streaming audio. It combines three techniques: Advanced Audio Coding (AAC), Spectral Band Replication (SBR), and Parametric Stereo (PS) (only in v2).\n\nThe aacPlus codec was standardized by the MPEG under the High Efficiency AAC (HE-AAC) name. The codec can operate at very low bitrates and is good for Internet radio streaming. It is claimed that a 48 kilobit-per-second stream will produce higher quality output than MP3 at 128 kbit/s. While listening tests[1] suggest that this claim is unfounded, aacPlus generally outperforms other popular codecs in the 32-64 kbit/s range. Its main competition for delivering acceptable quality at these bitrates comes from MP3pro, which also employs SBR.\n\nAacPlus is supported in the open source FAAD/FAAD2 decoding library (and all players incorporating it), Winamp, foobar2000, and Sony's latest SonicStage version 4.\n\niTunes does not yet support aacPlus,so the only players for Mac OS X are VLC and MPlayerOSX.\n\nNero has released a free of charge command line HE-AAC encoder, and also support HE-AAC inside the Nero software suite.\n\nThe 3GPP consortium released source code of a reference HE-AACv2 encoder that appears to be quite competitive regarding quality[2]. No community-supported Free Software encoder is available yet.\n\n______________________________\n\nAdvanced Audio Coding (AAC) is a standardised, lossy digital audio compression scheme. It was developed with the cooperation and contributions of companies mainly including Dolby, Fraunhofer (FhG), AT&T, Sony and Nokia, and was officially declared an international standard by the Moving Pictures Experts Group in April of 1997. It was written into specification as Part 7 of the MPEG-2 standard, and again into Part 3 of the MPEG-4 standard. As such, AAC can be referred to as MPEG-2 Part 7 and MPEG-4 Part 3 depending on its implementation, but is most often referred to as MPEG-4 AAC, or AAC for short. However, "MP4" usually refers to the format described in MPEG-4 Part 14, which is a container format for carriage of video and audio data.\n\nAAC was designed as an improved-performance codec relative to MP3 (which was specified in MPEG-1 and MPEG-2) by the ISO/IEC in 11172-3 and 13818-3.\n\nAAC was promoted as the successor to MP3 for audio coding at medium to high bitrates. Its popularity is currently maintained by it being the default Apple iTunes codec, the media player which powers iPod, the most popular digital audio player on the market. [1] Furthermore, the iTunes Store, whose sales account for 85% of the market for legal online downloads, [2] sells AAC-encoded songs (encapsulated with FairPlay Digital Rights Management).
475509
(a) ac is equal to cd and It can be used to express to length and breath of a square.\n\n(b) 3x plus 5y is equal to 2z and it can be used to express to compare inapplicable two concepts.\n\n(c) x plus 4 is equal t and it is greater 7 and x would be 5 or 5 over value.
205989
Becase of the + sign, many mistake NIS+ as an improvement over NIS. In reality, NIS+ is developed from scratch.\n\nNIS is flat while NIS+ is hierarchical which means you can\ncreate subdomains in NIS+\n\nNIS+ is much more secure than NIS.\n\nData is stored in maps in case of NIS and in tables in case of NIS+\n\nCommands start with the letters "yp" in NIS, and "nis" in NIS+\n\nNIS does not support authentication, authorization and secure RPC, whereas NIS+ does.
530972
different formats.\n\n- is more common, but the + is beter quality.\n\nThe + takes records data on a stream, which makes it easy to record on, so, if you have a recordable DVD player, these are the kinds to go for.
356128
Its alt+3, and FYI Alt and a number is a way of printing orginal symbols from ASCII text, (first printer data kinda thing)
1147809
both are diff pls refer any Univ which will help u to know better
512068
Go here:\nhttp://www.av-comparatives.org/ \nand click Comparatives on the left of page.
192262
waa?\nmore details please!!
54829
MAC-48 and EUI-48\n\nMedia Access Control address (MAC address)\nExtended Unique Identifier (EUI)
660042
Go here and click on "Comparatives" on the left side:\nhttp://www.av-comparatives.org/
972887
PC.\n\nMac has less than 8% of the market.  \nMac is more expensive\nIf you are used to a PC then going to a MAC is going to take a little bit of time to get used to.\nSignificant amount of software is available for the PC compared to MAC.\nMajority of businesses use PCs over Macs\nMore repair shops and experts available for PCs\netc.
8963
Hey check the following link\nhttp://www.cs.wisc.edu/~dbbook/openAccess/thirdEdition/Oracle/user_guide/oracle_guide.html#gc\n\nI found that this answers to all the queries a beginner might have.\nEnjoy.
916413
as both are public key encryptions, both should be equally secure, but ecc is being adopted more often simply because it uses smaller key lengths viz a 163 bit ecc key would be equivalent to a 1024 bit rsa key. different algo\nlol
999811
No difference whatsoever. It's just two different names for the same thing.
334169
Cc\n\nCc is shorthand for Carbon copy. If you add a recipient's name to this box in an Outlook e-mail message, a copy of the message is sent to that recipient, and the recipient's name is visible to other recipients of the message.\n\nBcc\n\nBcc is shorthand for Blind carbon copy. If you add a recipient's name to this box in a mail message, a copy of the message is sent to that recipient, and the recipient's name is not visible to other recipients of the message. If the Bcc box isn't visible when you create a new message, you can add it.
396514
http://www.nationalcenter.org/AA.html
1162937
huh? i dont understand\na2a