Is the Republican downfall a liberal conspiracy? Military newspapers saying rumsfeld should go!!?
916573
Bob Ney resigned because he is going to jail in a bribery scandal. Did the liberals bribe him? I think not! The military has not liked Rumsfeld's leadership, decisions or general attitude for years
181796
Ha ha!!!  Why not blame it on the myth of the liberal media?  The sound you hear isn't the sound of the tree falling.  It's the sound of our illustrious president's public approval rating going down another few points.  The real question is, did he set out to destroy this country, or is he doing it by accident?
727826
Absolutely Bush owes the Troops an explanation and an apology. With Bush firing Rumsfeld right after the election, and not before the election, even makes it more viable for him to do so...What a looser Dumbya is. How compassionate is the moral values of the Neocons here?
794552
I just read the article. Since the article is a negative comment on YET ANOTHER Republican drummed out of public service for improper behavior, they will say it's all lies and Dems are making too much of it, while they can't stop talking about the media coverage of Kerry's remarks. Typical.
151943
if you take all our troops home right now what would happen to the fledgling democracy in irag? or afganistan?\nI am not a demorcrat or a republican......to many brain cells still living... but  I have enough sense to realize that if we withdraw today....thousand more innocents will die...I am torn.....I dont think that even one more american should lose thier life in that region...  we cant force democracy on people.....they dont seem to understand it or want it.......look at palistine.....years of fight for freedom .....they are there and what do they do? vote for the monsters that attack innocents.......what the hell....? being a pacifist is also not the anwser....those folks dont respect weakness.... think if we send a message loud and clear you kill one americian.... journalist...and the pain begins......will get thier attention.....I am rambling again.......and to all the haters of republicans...\nlook what the demorcrat party has done to Mass...and Ca..\n I have been to both states...live there...if you are a working person......you are taxed out yur u know what...?\nwhy ? entitlements for the masses who vote for demorcrats.......but it cant be paid for.......so thier solution...taxes taxes taxes.......soon the business move... from cali to nevada ..arizona ect... mass.... well I am rambling sorry......hit a couple of nerves.. Peace
873552
That is F-ing great,, right from the the source this republican beast claims as it's forefathers! Ha! If that was broadcast today people would be calling it liberal media propaganda. Great!.
914851
Can you please tell me what liberal media you are talking about so I can watch it.  All media is pro bush.  It's funny how people will fixate on a remark but going to war based on a lie doesn't upset anyone, leaking agents names to newspapers by the current administration doesn't get anyone in tizzy, inappropriate behavior by current administration staff isn't that big of a deal.  What will it take for republicans to actually get upset with how the current administration is running the country.
1034177
The fact that we caught one means we ARE on the right track (with a few detours) and that just proves that the Liberals were....OMG...WRONG!! Just wait though...next move Bush makes , they'll be back bashing everyone and everything they can get their hands on. Personally, they don't know what they're talking about! Bush is acually doing Something while liberals want to sit back here and hide. GO MILITARY!! GO BUSH!!! GO AMERICA!!!
711923
Very badly I'm sad to say.  We should have known this,  and no doubt Bush was told of this possibility by his military.  I don't believe it is republican pride so much as from everyone's being deliberately lied to about why we should  have been there in the first place.  We should have gone to Afghanistan to get Osama, whatever happened to him?  He's probably  sitting in a Paris cafe drinking coffee and reading about Iraq in the paper.  Iraq was a deception perpetrated on the public,taking advantage of the patriotism of the American people.  The shame is that it looks like Iraq will never improve, only serving those who are pro fitting from it, while our troops get wounded and die, and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis perish.
545012
By the way, you forgot the Democratic theft of the 2004 Washington gubernatiorial election (so ably documented at "SoundPolitics.com")\n\nYou suggested a large part of the reason in your opening: "the broadcasters. . .conspired. . . "  \n\nWell, I'm not too sure "conspired" is the right word, at least not for most of them.  (It really only take a few conspirators; the rest may be quite unwitting accomplices.)    The basic reason, I believe, is that the media simply has deep CONVICTIONS (or bias!) that it is not able to overcome (perhaps because they are not able/willing to recognize they ARE biased).\n\nLet's face it -- the Old Media is largely on the political left, whereas talk radio, for instance, is mainly on the right.  The PROBLEM is that talk radio, right bloggers, etc. ANNOUNCE their bias --'this is where we're coming from'.  But the liberal Old Media, by its very inability (refusal?) to simply admit IT is biased to the left, blinds itself to self-critique and correction.\n\nFor the Old Media it is extremely difficult to recognize and highlight fraud by the party they are overwhelmingly sold out to (not literally but in their personal convictions!) ... to admit that people who share their convictions COULD do such... it's too much for them.\n\nConsider also that there are leading Democrats who often go out of their way to leak, plant and spin stories in the sadly unsuspecting press, which rarely thinks to stop to question the motivation of those critcizing or accusing the right.   And the sheer constancy (in number and repetition) of ACCUSATIONS -- no matter how ill-founded-- can, over time, start giving people the impression (without any evidence!) that "there must be something to it".  The MSM is here both perpetrator and victim.  \n\nAgain, I DO hesitate to call MOST of this "conspiracy" -- I believe many in the media (and in the Democratic party as well) are quite sincere.  Before anything even happens, they are already so convinced that the Democrats are right, that Republicans not the Dems would SURELY be the ones to try to 'disenfranchise' voters that it makes them simply incapable of SEEING things happening under their very noses  (and if they are sometimes forced to admit it in this or that instance, they still operate from the deep CONVICTION [almost religious!] that this is an aberration, whereas the Republicans really are committed to using any means, fair or foul, to win... even when NO evidence of it can be discovered.\n\nCompounding this is the fact that much of the liberal media IS living in a "bubble" -- they are hardly exposed to anyone who thinks or sees things differently from them. (There is, in a sense, an advantage to being on the right -- you can hardly escape being hit with the spin of the left.  Many on the left can almost if not completely avoid being exposed to people of conviction on the right... so they simply do not understand them.) There is very little diversity, for instance, in their news rooms, no one to ask the key questions or point out the problems that are OBVIOUS to intelligent commentators on the right.\n\nAs evidence of this sort of deep conviction, note that other answers you are getting!  Generic accusations or repetition of charges that have been DIS-proven (e.g., many on the left still seem unaware of the major media recounts of Florida in early 2005 and how they showed Bush won on ANY reasonable recount method).  Are they lying?  Some perhaps.  But others are just SO convinced already (and so mad about it all!) that they are UNABLE to look at evidence that doesn't fit their convictions.\n\nI can think of TWO other reasons or contributing factors.\n\n1) Some of the examples of fraud you cite were SO baldfaced that it is a bit difficult to believe anyone would have tried them!   They SOUND like nutty conspiracy theories!  (And note that much of the media HAS refused to give much
862489
You just can't trust anything Bush says. \nHere's my take on the Rumsfeld resignation. With Democrats taking control of the House and Senate, they will begin investigations for the Bush administration's failures and most likely more. I am really wondering why Republicans have had private talks with Henry Kissinger very recently. Quite possibly, damage control. If you look back to the 70's, Kissinger was part of the Nixon team, when Watergate was investigated. \nBush is trying to raise his popularity rating whether he'll admit it or not.  He'll say anything to make himself look good. Bush only confuses himself not us, not all of us. Bush can't keep the story straight because, he doesn't understand the plot. I think he may finally begin to realize that it's not about him. I am wondering if anyone else saw that none of Bush's best buds were present at the press conference yesterday. No Cheney, no Laura Bush. Does Bush have children anymore?Parents? Must be lonely in the Duck Pond.
880346
Sounds like a typical libterd statement. The Army and the republicans can't win with you no mater what. Stay the course, right thing to do, now and always!
1184300
The liberal won't accept good news; they won't read into zarkawi's letter anything positive.  They would only want to win the war on terrorism if they we're in office.  They'd prefer we lose right now so they can blame something else on Bush.  \n\nDid you ever notice they don't blame the bad economy on Bush?  Oh thats right the economy isn't bad.
1005849
And what about that CIA lady that Rove had killed cause her husband was a critic?  Oh yeah he denied it..so it must not be true...lol.\n\nWhat happened to the guy Cheney shot while hunting with their mistresses?\n\nThat story kinda disappeared.\n\nAnd what IS the deal between Bush and Rice?  lol  cant get that image out of my mind (true or not its just funny)\n\nRemember when the nazis get mad and call names its cause your point hit home.  Maybe one will disagree respectfully?  Not likely...but would be a nice change.\n\nbtw. Liberal simply means free...Con means trick.\n\nPS  just read Larry's post....there it goes again the persistent view that Iraq was connected to the towers...where do they get this info from?  A couple of headlines and these people will want to invade anyplace and kill anyone.  The power of propaganda.\n\nLove your enemy good Christians.
1146951
wait a minute.  who are these "Libs so gung ho for War?"  i'm certainly no liberal, but i know, and tolerate, somewhat, a number of self-proclaimed liberals.  by the same token, i know and tolerate, somewhat, a number of conservatives (who are mostly embarrassed these days).  all these folks, which i regard as friends and associates have one thing in common.  they are against the war.  they mostly feel they've been lied to by a government they want so much to support.  now personally i knew bush was lieing when i saw his lips moving.  now of course i've been prooven correct.  that doesn't make me feel any better.  this war is a tragedy.  \n\nas for your commentary on main stream media, you describe it as "their MSM media."  i take it you see the media as liberal?  where have you been?  main stream media is anything but liberal. when was it?  sure there have been a few liberal types who had columns, perhaps a few television talking heads, but media is big business, and in so many cases is unabashed state propaganda.  you should thank your god that there are liberals in the media.
463555
No doubt about it, the Repugnantans are goin' down. \n\n- American troops sent to fight and bleed and die under false pretenses?\n- Intelligence reports cherry-picked, ignored, and twisted to make the false case for that war?\n- Journalists bribed to write favorable articles?\n- An undercover CIA agent outed for political purposes?\n- Intervention on behalf of sweatshops on US Pacific territory (Saipan) that enslave women for forced labor, forced prostitution, and FORCED ABORTIONS?\n- Intervention in US Army war profitteering investigations, on behalf of the war profitteers?\n- $8.8 BILLION missing from Iraq reconstruction fund?\n- A prostitute getting a daily White House press pass for over a year?\n- The Department of Homeland Security a haven for pedophiles?\n- No port security plan?\n- Criminal negligence by the federal government before, during and after Katrina?\n- Money laundering?\n- Insider trading through a (supposedly) blind trust?\n- Congressional boondoggle trips to:\n. . -- golf in Scotland\n. . -- cruise on the Mediterranean\n. . -- sunbathe at Pacific island resorts?\n- Huge tax breaks for the oil industry WHILE they are making record-breaking profits by price-gouging consumers?\n- Prisoner abuse at Abu Graib, Guantanimo Bay, and who knows how many hidden gulags in Eastern Europe and the Middle East? \n- The architects of the "K Street Project" put in charge of lobbying reform?\n- Slap-on-the-wrist mining safety enforcement, leading to disaster after disaster?\n- Lie upon Lie upon Lie upon Lie upon LIE? \n\nHad enough? Vote Democrat.\n\n_________________________\nASIDE TO ima...: Yes, the Democrats ARE less corrupt than the Repugnantans by a wide, wide margin
1140568
Because liberals control the media and they will stop at nothing to get Republicans out of office. Good news from Iraq would help Republicans stay in power and it will make George W. Bush look good and they loathe him.