What could the gemans have done differently  to with the war ?
916202
The Battle of the Bulge was a side-show compared to the epic struggles on the eastern Front, but that's another discussion.\n\nThese are just some items that come to mind re: your question:\n\n1. Full scale efforts to experiment with 'heavy water' thus leading to a nuclear device.\n\n2. Not allow the BEF to escape from Dunkirk.\n\n3. Start Operatioun Barbarossa in May of 1941 (in order to beat the Russian winter of that year.)\n\n4. Focus on one or two tank designs, eg. Panther and King Tiger, rather than dilute the resources with multiple designs.\n\n5. Give Rommel at least 4 or 5 more divisions to his Africa Corps, in order to complete the invasion of Egypt and open the middle east oil fields.\n\n6. After the invasion of Russia, allow the conquered countries into the german fold, rather than view them as sub-human.  Initially, many thought the germans were liberators against Stalin's iron rule.\n\n7. Rather than divert Panzers in the fall/winter of 1941 to encircle Kiev, keep the pressure on Moscow.\n\n8. The biggest blunder, leave Stalingrad, and use mobile forces to engage in encirclement of the Russian armies.  Urban warfare is not suited for the blitzkrieg tactics.\n\n9. Release the Panzer reserves, prior to the Normandy invasion, to Rommel, as he wanted, in order to commit them within hours of the invasion.  Instead, they were withheld by Hitler expecting an attack at Pas De Calais.\n\n10. I almost forgot, Hitler could've kept the pressure on RAF Fighter Command's airfields/radar stations in 1940-41, rather than switching to the bombing of London/Coventry and other cities.\n\njust to name a few.
361551
Of course it would have made a differance, we could use them to drive ahead of real soldiers and detonate any road side bombs that may have been planted.
217286
Well, it was Passover at the time, and the money-changers did big business then.  People who came from foreign parts had to have their money changed into Jewish currency as this was the only money accepted for the Temple tax, and for the purchase of animals used for sacrifices.  Nothing changes: often the inflated rates of exchange made the moneychangers richer than they should have been, and the prices charged by the merchants for their animals was exorbitant.  Their stalls were set up int the Court of the Gentiles in the Temple; to get to the Temple non-Jews had to pass through it, so they were beleaguered on every side before they got there.  This is what made Jesus angry; they were, in effect, keeping Gentiles from worshipping God.
429850
inreality non of those ,the war was to make money for the european powers and especialy Rothchild.\nwww.infowars.
717714
The Ottoman Empire fought on the side of Germany and Austria in World War I (cf. the film Lawrence of Arabia).\n\nAfter they lost the war, the Ottomans were stripped of most of their country/empire, except Turkey, and most of their former territory was divided between the victorious allies after the war.\n\nThere was a delay between the end of the war (1918) and the decision to carve up the area (1920). In that period, Syria was an independent Arab country under King Faisal in Damascus (cf. Lawrence of Arabia again).\n\nFrom 1920 (not 1925), France got to administer Syria and Lebanon and Britain got to administer Palestine and Jordan.\nIt was a military occupation and administration, rather than "Martial Law", which is different. It is more similar to what Syrian troops did in Lebanon after the civil war there.\n\nOn the plus side, the French invested heavily in updating Syria's infrastructure (which the Ottomans had ignored).
929645
absolutely not. that was a time of war. there was a battle going on sir.\n\na battle that the Mushrikun started in the first place.\n\nplease read the verse all the way on top of the page. \n\nit says,\n\ncall to the way of your Lord with wisdom and sincere exhortaions and debate with them in manners that are most appropriate { An Nahl 16:125}
555783
Yeah, they could have. Any religion could have. It's just a matter of time. Although I can't see no buddhists bombing towers... :) I am no buddhist.
381938
He united them. Told the nation that the Jews were the reason for their poor performance(poverty, unstable economy...)\nOf course that is not true but the Jews were a scapegoat.
1038840
Ok, so basically this is an issue that no one will ever be able to answer. Seeing as how this "holy" war has been occurring for the last few decades or so, I think it all comes down to who was there first. Think about it. If I stormed into your house tonight and demanded that everyone get out - what would you do? If you saw your wife and daughter raped and mutilated - what would you do? If you son was walking home from school, throws a rock at a tank and is shot dead - what would you do? This is what happens EVERY single time. Naturally, the Palestinian people must retaliate. And then they get blamed. So, what does it come down to? Territory. Man is territorial by nature and is greedy - the more the better. Hence, the never ending Isreal-Palestine war.
627589
I think we won't really know the impact of the war in Iraq for years down the road.  I sort of think of it like this:  People tried to ignore and appease Hitler.  In the end it cost 6 million Jewish people thier lives.  Perhaps if someone had taken a stronger stand earlier on it could have been avoided.  Maybe going in to Iraq earlier instead of waiting for something catasrophic to occur will save more people in the long run.  In that respect, maybe Bush is enlightened compared to the average guy on the street.
308949
For the loss of land, a little, but at the same time according to the ancient rite of war that the Nations lived by as well the countries that our forefathers came from held to states that the land goes to the victors.\n\nThere are things that our forefathers  did to the Nations that I'm ashamed of, but at the same time it was on par with some of the things that some Nations used against the settlers or the military.\n\nThe worst thing that the US did was to make the Nations ward of the State.  Taking the pride away from the people, making them dependent on the Federal Government for their survival.  The result to day for a good portion is despicable, but some of the Nations by starting casinos have improved things for themselves.\n\nReparations while they would be owed would only exasperate the situation
82259
we just forgot all about it... there was no conflict 100 years ago.. it is all about the lost rights of Palastinian ppl in havin thier own land and the lost right of all muslims to get thier Aksa Mousqe in Jersualem back.. and the west is protecting Israel with all means.. in order to not give the muslims thier rights... i condem any terrorist attack on any country... but we should ask our selves why these ppl are doing so.. i think it is thier dispair in getting our rights... it is not the well to kill.. or that islam tell us to kill.. we have to be objective and not shallow when we think about it.. the medie story telling is so so so misleading about the truth of the whole coflict.. if we can solve the Plastanian Islreali conflect then i thnk no confict will find place.... but the problem that they want to force ppl to accept what is on the real site... regarding the rights of muslims.. then the conflict happen..... you can tolerate in your personal right.. but you can not in your reliogous rights... and if you ask muslims to do so... then why dont Jews do it..
1001375
Looks like you answered your own question...\n\nMoney and resources were diverted because of the war.
1024768
the Russian and Gypsy people of that era do not hold all of us to ransom for what a demented german tried to achieve. Why in God's name are we still paying for that mistake in history but are asked to overlook everything the Jewish Lobby and Israel do?
639309
absolutely.  for example, egypt.  they haven't had a native egyptian ruling them for millenia.  all because pharoah wouldn't let the isrealites go.
300961
NO!!!  It was agreed by the allies to the friendly arab states in the region that allied special forces would not go into Bagdad itself-during Gulf War I.  However, British Special Air Service and US NAVY SEALS troops where in the city as snipers and where ready to take Saddam out-which would have brought about the necessary regime change.  But the troops were told to pull out and to not carry out the assassination otherwise it would effect the diplomatic relationships-which would have also effected the oil supplies.\n\nSo the allies had to go in and do it properly this time instead.
39895
Palestinan and Israel conflict.  Jews moved on their land during WW11.  Divided over who gets Jeruselem and holy areas.  Just an idea.