Why dont republicans like Nancy Pelosi?
926928
She is a flaming left wing wacko......\n100 million dollar left wing wacko....\ndo you think she eats a t Mickey D's like the rest of us.\nor cracker barrel, or TGIF.......she marched along side\na known pedophile who was promoting it.
762954
They didn't get what they want.  What the US got is a conservative democratic Congress, and Pelosi.\n\nThey want impeachment of our President.  They will not shut up until Pelosi and others flip-flop and give it to them.  \n\nThey care nothing about our nation, they want only revenge.
839524
Pelosi said in her first press conference that Rumsfeld should be replaced.  She indicated that she would be unwilling to work with him so Bush was avoiding a big power struggle in order to actually get some things accomplished.
820124
Pelosi is an American abomination, an uncouth, raucous politician unfit to lead.  She belongs in prison.  Democrats adore her.  Role model?
859009
Great question. This is why Democrats might want to keep the Champaign on ice for awhile.\n The majority of wins for Democrats were those who have shown Conservative values in their past decision making.\n Either they are tough on Defence, Fiscally responsible, Pro Life, or a full house.\n The thing is, the minute Pelosi and Reid attempt to drive through their Socialist agenda I believe they will find unexpected opposition within their own Party.\n This is why we now hear folks backing off of certain issues now.\n Before the Elections they were prepared to start Impeachment Proceedings against the President, now Pelosi say's it's off the table, what happened? \n Think about it, they have talked a good game but when the hammer hits the desk who in their right mind is gonna provide a Military exit timeline to the terrorists so all they have to do is wait us out then attack when we abandon our obligations.\n Who in their right mind is willing to take away tax cuts and end the record Stock Market growth.....Someone who doesn't want to keep a job, that's who.\n So remind me...Who won this election?
816446
I'm a conservative, and not only do I not care for O'Reilly, Bakker, or Falwell in the least, I'm not a big fan of Rush or Newt, either. They are not 'heroes' in any sense of the word, IMO, and never have been.\n\nIt's too bad they're all immoral and impure, unlike the Christ-like Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Gary Condit, William Jefferson, Alcee Hastings, etc.
717390
probably the same reason the right wingers hate everything else.\n\ndemocrats suck and republicans blow. thats how it works.
821410
WOULD YOU CONSIDER THIS MORE MIS-INFORMATION?::::::::::::::::::::Consider the following votes (all opposed by the vast majority of Americans): NANCY PILOSI VOTING RECORD\nOn July 31, 1996, Pelosi voted against the historic Welfare Reform Bill and later voted against its reauthorization; \nOn July 19, 2006, Pelosi voted against protecting the right to say "one nation under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance; \nOn Sept. 20, 2006, Pelosi voted against requiring that voters be identified so we could ensure only legal citizens are voting; \nOn July 13, 2006, Pelosi voted against requiring English on ballots; \nOn June 30, 2005, Pelosi refused to side with homeowners against the Kelo decision \nthat allows cities to seize private property for profitable ventures,\n even though 365 members voted to stop cities from taking private property. \nPelosi has voted at least 12 times against the death penalty; \nPelosi was one of only 67 House members to vote against the 1996 \nDefense of Marriage Act (DOMA); \nPelosi has voted at least eight times against banning partial-birth abortion, \nat least three times against the Unborn Victims of Violence Act (Laci's law),\n and scored a perfect 100 percent rating from NARAL Pro-Choice America; \nPelosi voted against a bill that would "[b]ar the transportation of a minor girl\n across state lines to obtain an abortion without the consent of a parent, guardian or judge;" \nPelosi voted at least 31 times for using local or federal taxpayer dollars to fund abortions; and \nPelosi received an "F" rating from the National Rifle Association.
836457
becaue they aren't really into family values, their cliam to be merely cons some people into voting for them, I mean would you let a republican congressman babysit your children?
842392
Because Pelosi won't fit.
1140918
yeah, they are  bitter.\n\nExcept republicans are worse....they are in control and they are still bittter.....clinton did this, clinton didn't do this....clinton got some head. CLinton clinton clinton...\n\njust like Marsha Marsha Marsha!!!!
709569
Pelosi's ploy to back Murtha is just that...a ploy. In order to maintain a low profile over the next few years, she cannot be the front-runner or placed under the scrutany any speaker gets. That would ruin her chances at, say, running for President.\n\nTrent Lott should stay behind the scenes. So long as he isnt perceived as being relevant, he will remain relevant. As for him losing the assignment the first time, that was simply a power play by other Republicans who thought they would do better filling his shoes. Unlikely he will get the nod again unless they really feel he will straighten out the mess they made.
987351
Because of Republicans
144355
I think she is a Sellout because she is Black and a women. Either one makes you a sellout if you are republician. If you are rich then it is not so bad and I can understand. Rich people who are republicans are OK because they choose the party for financial reasons and not their backwards views on morality. Republicans hate change and they want things to "be the way they use to be." Unequal rights are the way it used to be and if republicans actaully believed they could reverse most of the progress made in this US in the last 100 years, they would!
879002
nancy pelosi and hillary clinton are not fooling me
1051853
because they care about money more... it's that simple...\n\nDemocrats usually put other things before money... like family and friends...\n\nI'm not saying that all Republicans dislike family or friends, but the most successful (money wise) people I know, are those that put money before everything else... and most of them are Republicans... that I know\n\nI mean look at your screen name for example...you could choose anything, yet you choose the name of a status symbol of your wealth and clearly that is how you define success... wealth...\n\nderek_walter: I agree with much of what you said... and the REALLY SCARY THING IS... even the democrats have started telling Bush... "ok... you've spent enough, time to slow it down some"...
744901
Did you actually listen to what she had to say?  Is that what you want the Democrats to do?  Spend their time tying up the Congress with impeachment proceedings?  She's right, it's a waste of time.  There are only two years left in Bush's Administration and she's right that they would love nothing more than for the Democrats to prove they are what the Republicans have been saying all along.  Thirsting for revenge and hatred of Bush is the Dems only platform - that's what the Republicans were saying before the mid-terms.  Now you want that to be true?  Not me.  I want the war, our economy, and terrorism addressed on a bipartisan level.   There are going to be investigations into the constitutionality of many of Bush's actions, that's a given.  I hold no love for George Bush, but those thirsting for impeachment/revenge will have to find water elsewhere and I couldn't agree more.