Did you know those use silly scientists have got it wrong again? If only they would look in their bible?
927937
Not to mention the fact that it says that insects only have four legs too.
477169
Having been in Israel, I know the weather conditions. I don't need science to prove my beliefs. They can come up with logic or reason or faith or whatever...I still believe. The world needs to try to disprove Scripture. It makes them feel good. And, while science may give them what they want; it won't give them what they need.
648313
I don't think enough religious people are suspicious of "science".  Modern science is constantly contradicting itself.\n\nAnd, I don't think the Bible contradicts itself.  Man's interpretations may contradict themselves; thus, the interpretations may be wrong.  Also, the Books of the Bible were written at different times, the subjects may have changed.  That is, if I wrote a Book three hundred years ago and said "there are no aircrafts in the sky" and someone else wrote a Book today, saying "there are aircrafts everywhere in the sky", it does not mean that the collective works (the two Books, plus) contradict themselves.  And, there is so much not understood between the alleged contradictions such that one could not say for certain that they contradict.  That is, one Book (written 700 years ago) might say  "There are no aircrafts in the sky"; then Books (written 300 years ago) might say "There are aircrafts on the sky everywhere".  The part in between the two alleged contradictions and not understood or misinterpreted [coded by those big names or terms we don't understand] (actually) means "The following is hogwash; I had to say it for my own and mankind's protection".  Thus, in actuality, the Books do not contradict themselves (it's just misunderstood).\n\nPossible.\n\nPeace.
548060
*sigh*\n\nand this is why people are looking to alternative atheist theories
967679
It does seem suspicious, doesn't it...perhaps they don't want to prove the Bible to be correct?
1067838
You do realize that the bible is a work of fiction, don't you?
659925
The discoveries of science should be analyzed in light of the Bible.  Science that doesn't fit, (very little doesn't) should be put to one side and studied until it can be properly studied.  Scientists that are not Christians can not truly understand the mysteries of God.  Scientists like the Creation Science Institute, can evaluate things better as being Christians they have the help of the Holy Spirit.  A non Christian will disagree completely with me.  \nSO The Bible proves Science/ we analyze science by the truth of the Bible.\nI am not going to get into it in depth, but there are so many examples of what we thought was true, and now know is not.  Evolution is one of those theorys.
1160273
Yeah , maybe we should tell then to read something else, anything else.\n\n"How do I know, the Bible tells me so." It has nice stories and its ok to believe whatever you do. I wish people would be more open to finding out what is really true and what isn't. Would you believe every word of the "Weekly World News"? "The New York Times.?Nazis?\nAny one source?
573172
Hmm kinda makes you wonder about that whole "bible" thing, huh? Is this the first inconsistency that you have run across?\n\nWatch out - they used to burn people at the stake who asked too many questions...
254472
Why believe a book that is full of inaccuracies and contradictions?  See the following link...\nhttp://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/
35639
NO! Go read the bible!
654237
The ingredients you find to rationalize your disbelief amuses me! Come on, dude, FLEAS!!!LOL that is your way of proving their's no God!? Weak proof at best. You should go back to the guy who put that into your head and slap him!!!LOL( just kidding, don't do that!) Appendectomies, right? Well I don't remember any of God's prophets killed from a lack of appendix surgeries! Yet God has always healed HIS CHILDREN who love Him. God uses such problems as the appendix to judge grown ups,yet things go wrong, and little children die, but isn't it better that they don't have to go on in this world but rather in a perfect world with their Father? Ohh yea, you believe that's it for the child, no chance, no hope, no love. Your beliefs sentence those children to nothingness and loss. Is that right? The "beef" as you say is in the Bible and you're starving yourself trying to devour the scraps dropped from Darwin's table. But his table is empty by Darwin's own admission. Darwin said "If one could prove that single-celled organisms can split then I am wrong." (I'm paraphrasing) And they can split as your precious science has proven. So why do scientists continue to back Darwin's THEORY? Because they would rather back a lie that they discovered rather than the truth that makes them useless. I'll tell you another miracle of God, friend. The miracle of God changing your heart, and that's the one that's harder than any other, but IT CAN HAPPEN if you'd let it.
1045700
I totally agree. People should read the Bible if they are going to question it, praise it, or reject it. Then they are basing their decisions on what they KNOW rather than what they think they percieve.
545540
For the most part, their logic goes something like this:\n\n1. It's not in the Bible. Period!\n2. It gives a different viewpoint of 'The Betrayer'!!!\n3. Jesus NEVER laughed!!!...\n\nOr something along those lines. LOL.\n\nIt only goes to prove that certain people have really missed the mark ENTIRELY about THE MESSAGE. And instead, they'd rather nit-pick on who-did-what-to-whom kind of thing.\n\nI find that too silly though...
572537
We have discussed this, and I think it is unfair for you to cut off the topic by saying the Bible is wrong and don't say this and don't say that. There is only one answer that you will be satisfied with.\n\nThe Bible is not a book of science. The Bible is a book of redemption and eternity. Science is tied and bound to the limitations of physical time-space and can venture no further. The Bible steps beyond where science cannot venture.
731907
Empirical science does not prove the Bible wrong but certain beliefs that some scientists hold do go against the Bible. The bible is historically accurate more than any other written work in existance. It was also written with geographical points of reference. Archeology has verified so many cities, locations of all kinds, buildings, peoples, and the occurance of major events, existance of rulers and more up to the 2nd chapter of the first book of the Bible, Genesis, where the first landmarks are mentioned. There is no conflict with observable science and the content of scripture. Prophecy has been shown to be verified from past accounts in the Bible making it a unique book. The human history in geneology is found in the bible up to the birth of Jesus. The provable accounts of where the main nations came from are recorded in the book of Genesis chapter 10. \n\nAnyone with a unbiased opinion would be able to see that the Bible is very unique to the Point of being divinely written when a general study of it is done. The present world events and the ones still come will further enhance the divine mark of the Bible when the fullfilment of more prophecy is seen as in the world ruler arising and the Jewish Temple rebuilt and more.\n\nUsually it is the issue of Darwinian evolution that some people try to hold against the Bible when it comes to science but when it comes down to it observable science (not the philoshophy of Darwinism) is in harmony with the Bible where it states that creatures multiply according to their own kind as stated in the first chapter of Genesis. \n\nHistory also proves that people have been changed by the influence of the Bible as well as whole nations being impacted as the history of the U.S.A. shows.
110102
Good question! Silly Christians.