what is forum non convenian and anti suit injunctions?
931372
forum non conveniens means "this is not the convenient forum"... for example, let's say you are suing someone in country A for a wrong committed in country B (eg, a car accident in country B), country A is the "forum non conveniens" and country B is the "forum conveniens"\n\nan anti-suit injunction can be brought by the potential defendant in country B against the potential plaintiff to restrain the latter from suing in country A..
139808
The courts hate pro per/pro se litigants. Most likely they are trying to get you to hire a double-agent liar, commonly refered to as a lawyer or atorney.\n\nThere are many resources on the internet, I like "outlaws legal service"(outlaw meaning someone denied equal protection under the law, not criminal). Try searching around for examples/forms of this order on yahoo,google, etc.\n\nI've represented myself several times at ohio courts and never had to file such an order, it was done by the court/judge. \n\nSounds to me like you simply need to file a schedule of the times/dates for the upcoming procedures of your case that the other party agrees to, most likely ones not attended at court and/or before a judge.\n \nIn civil matters you are commonly expected to have communications with the opposing party outside of court. \n\nSorry I couldn't be of more help.\n\nBEST WISHES IN YOUR ENDEAVOR!!!
596141
Both of the websites listed below offer voluntary yet binding resolution of disputes. They are not formal courts, created by the president and operating at the state or federal level.  They offer private arbitration and/or mediation.  Users can upload evidence and have access to an on-line jury who will decide the matter if the parties wish.  Though the system is convenient, there is a nominal user fee and one should consider the difficulty in enforcing judgments rendered by on-line court's before using the service.  \nhttp://www.i-courthouse.com/main.taf?&redir=0\nhttp://ecourthouse.com/
639875
Try to check at some forum.
309436
You might check the website for the US District Court for the North Mariana Islands: http://www.nmid.uscourts.gov/
226599
You don't have to go anywhere else.  You just appeal all adverse ruling.  You can not go around town and find a sympathetic judge, doing this is discouraged by the law.  It is called "forum shopping".
769015
Call the local bar association for a referral.  If no one will take the case on a contingency fee, there is an excellent chance you don't have a case.
258394
Not me, I don't want to get sued.  If you got a question, talk to a lawyer
771093
This seems an advertisement and not a question. Wrong forum.
13154
Include a robots.txt file on your site.\nGo here for further instructions:\nhttp://www.robotstxt.org/wc/exclusion-admin.html\n\nYou could also include the following on the top of specific pages that you don't want indexed:\n<META NAME="ROBOTS" CONTENT="NOINDEX, NOFOLLOW">\nonly a few search bots use this so far.
82076
If you mean oppose then no.\n\nI asked Jeeves & googled it and couldn't come up with anything that I could understand but thanks for trying to expand my mind
820823
In order for it to be considered Forum Non Conveniens (latin for "unconvenient forum" ) there have to be certain requirements:\n1. there has to be a more adequate forum\n2. the other forum must be of better service to the parties\n3. neither the plaintiff nor the defendant can be harmed by such a procedure\n\nIf, for example, the witnesses are located in the US, then it would be "of better service" to the parties to have the dispute resolved in the US.. if elsewhere then this somewhere else would be "more adeqaute" and so on\n\nYou can check the Spiliada Case. It's considered a landmark case regarding Forum Non Conveniens (In UK though)\n\nYou can also check the Laker Airways Case, where the UK and US were fighting over jurisdiction, and it was later held that both were free to proceed the trial. US due to territorial reasons and the UK due to the nationality of several parties. This case has to do more with Anti Suit Injunctions, though.
283983
The big issue in the eBay v. MercExchange case is whether or not courts should automatically issue injunctions against patent infringers.\n\nThe law states that a court MAY issue an injunction against an infringer where infringement is found.  (An injunction is a court order saying that the infringer may no longer make/use/sell the infringing technology).  However, as a matter of practice, a court will automatically issue an injunction where infringement is found.\n\nSo the question is this... should eBay have to shut down it's entire site because one aspect of it infringes?\n\nEBay says no, that MercExchange should not be able to shut them down that easily.\n\nBig Pharma/Biotech is very interested in the outcome of this case because they rely on the ability to shut down infringers.
506152
www.legalzoom.com\nor for references \nwww.handelonthelaw.com
331157
To allow the defendent to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty (or in some jurisdictions, "no contest").  This lets the judge know how to proceed, when to set a trial date, entertain any pre-trial motions, and set bail as appropriate.
202684
A restraining order is not a conviction.  \n\nI'm not sure what you are asking here though.
895559
An Injunction of Protection is for women or men that are being abused and/or stalked.  You can file an eviction against him.  Contact the court house in your county and ask what you need to do to start the eviction process.\n\nGood Luck and Take Care