I'm looking for a particular site about universe creation theories.?
928559
You will find your answer on your question in Wikipedia at http://www.wikipedia.org/ by searching for Big Bounce or oscillatory universe.\n\nAnd regarding PROTO Universe theory, you will find it at the following site: http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/05mar/slides/plenaryw-7.pdf \n\nI hope you will find the references helpful.
10290
The universe is created by a thought consciousness which manifests in physical reality through a geometric blueprint that we call Sacred Geometry which repeats in cycle giving the illusion of linear time.\n\n12=1+2=3=third dimension - manifestation in 3D\n12 spiraling cones around 1 source = 13 = 4=4th dimension = time\nForming grid programs of eXperience - MatriX - Tricks - Trickster - Duality\nThe boX = 'X' or the hourglass='Z'\n'X' - As is above, So is Below - Emerald Tablets of Thoth=Hermes Trismegistus\nHermes The Magician - Magic - Tricks - Magi - Christ Consciousness Grid\nThoth the ancient Egyptian Scribe who wrote our program\nEmerald = Alchemy - Emerald City = OZ - The WiZard\nAlchemy Wheel of Consciousness based on the spiraling patterns of\nSacred Geometry = SG = StarGate = Wheel of Karma = Alchemy Wheel\nwhich spirals consciousness back to Source\nand is linked with the center - Eye of the Milky Way Galaxy - the Heart
909681
We have plenty of evidence for the theory that the universe was created by the Big bang. The universe was definitely created by the Big bang. \n\nRegarding the theory that God created the universe from scratch, in view of the evidence for the Big Bang that is clearly nonsense and no-one with an ounce of scientific knowledge would accept it. \n\nAs to whether God created the Big Bang itself, and then let nature take its course - it is remotely possible. However, unlike the Big bang itself, we have no evidence for the claim that God created the Big Bang. For people to state this claim therefore is blind faith, and has no scientific worth. It is merely their opinion and is not evidence-based.
541263
The theory of the big bang doesn't explain things before it. But usually it's believed that before the creation of the universe there was energy concentrated or concentrating to the critic point where it blasted and spreaded through universe. The Big Bang theory is'nt the only theory about the creation of the universe, only the most accepted, you could find very interesting and different ideas. I don't like religious answers because their principal argument is faith and since faith can't be proven or refuted, I don't think it can be used as a valid argument, sounds tautologic for me (in logic, tautology is an statement that is ever true).
214436
try these links\nthts a really good question but its explainations is quite lengthy. so maybe if u go through all these links, u might get wat u really are looking for\n\nwww.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/txt/al.html\n\nwww.bartleby.com/173/\n\nwww-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/ ~history/HistTopics/General_relativity.html \n\nen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity\n\nwww2.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/NumRel/GenRelativity.html\n\ngood luck and have fun!
772249
Interesting.  When I read your question, my first thought was "creation."
633722
Well you can never be sure, but one theory is "The Big Bang".  Some useful websites are: \n\n- liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/universe/b_bang.html\n- www.umich.edu/~gs265/bigbang.htm\n- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang \n\nHave fun!
1181994
I believe in a comparitively new but very popular theory that Universe creation and destruction are cyclic in nature. Its like the BIG BANG, then BIG CRUNCH, then BIG BANG again and so on.... The energy for the newest big bang event (the one studied by Edwin Hubble), came from the previous big crunch.  The Cosmic Microwave Background, when studied suggests that the radiation at the denser parts of the universe are heavily red shifted. This is an evidence in support of energy being 'old'.
604533
If you believe the theory of creation, found in all major religions, you don't have a problem answering your own question.  If you subscribe to the 'Big Bang' theory (or a derivitive thereof), I would have to ask 'Who lit the fuse?'
653839
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Neil_Hawes/theory.htm\nhttp://www.musictheory.net/\nhttp://musiced.about.com/od/musictheory/
233899
Laney, first of all allow me to say that I'm incredibly glad and pleasantly surprised to hear of your genuine interest in this field.   You are to be truly commended for your intellectual courage and abilities.  ...But to address your question, there are in fact thousands of great explanatory/layman-type books out there on Quantum Mechanics, Field Theory, Gravity, Philosophy, Reality, and associated topics like cosmology, etc.  Some of them even dating back to the mid 70's, that nonetheless are still wonderful reads.  ...Theoretical physics at the level that we are talking about here, though, is unfortunately a seven-headed exotic mathematical monster that is not even accessible to most physicists, much less the lay person.   Having said that, and as you know, there have been courageous attempts by talented physicist like Brain Greene (and many others before and after him) to make our latest theoretical/scientific visions of the physical world/universe available to the general public.   ...Since you mentioned that you are NOT mathematically inclined, but did enjoy Greene's The Elegant Universe, the first thing that came to my mind (and the book that I would recommend most) was in fact Greene's newer work called "The Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time, and the Texture of Reality" - in case you haven't read it yet.    \n\nAmong some of the other more recent titles worth mentioning also are:\n\nThe Great Beyond - by: Paul Halpener (A very nice book)\n\nThe Cosmic Landscape - by: Leonard Susskind\n\nHiding in the Mirror - by: Lawrence M. Krauss\n\nThe Road to Reality - by: Rofer Penrose\n\nA First Course in String Theory - by: Barton Zwiebach (This is a very nice book but a lil' more mathematically oriented than you might enjoy - let's say undergraduate physics level) \n\nI also highly recommend:  The Five Ages of the Universe - by: Fred Adams\n\nThat should keep you busy for a while - Good Reading!  ;-)
586401
Parallel universes may exist.  Some cosmological theories encompass this possibility.  At the moment (and possibly always) there can be no verification by observation whether they  exist or not.  The question is, and may always be, an open question, without any definitive answer.
205397
It is the theory that this universe was cause by a large explosion from which hydrogen atoms where release forming different elements and what not. I have no idea, but I don't know how they came up with such theory. I believe it's plausible, but I doubt it's accurate.
669660
its actualy String-theory that proposes the existance of many other universes. the theory proposes a so called "Landscape of probabilities" with probabilities of as many as 10 to power of 500 universes, and with that many probabilities it is very likely that some of them will be similar to or just like our own universe.\n\nif you would like to know more about this facsinating subject, i would suggest this book http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0316155799/104-3626905-5554311?v=glance&n=283155\nits a great and easy to understand book.
52054
There are only theories.\nLike the Big Bang. Check source.
1015782
http://www.straightdope.com -- great column answering the mysteries of the universe.\nhttp://blogs.herald.com/dave_barrys_blog/ -- Dave Barry's blog. Hilarious news articles, web sites, and so forth.\nhttp://news.myway.com -- News and only news, plain and simple, without all the ostantatious flash and glitter that nearly all the other news sites have.\nhttp://online.wsj.com/home/us -- Wall Street Journal.  'Nuff said.\nhttp://www.mycomicspage.com/sign-in -- My Comics Page.  About half my comics.\nhttps://members.comics.com/members/welcome.jsp -- The other half of my comics.
1104077
Yes, there are many that hold the Creationist View. Those that come to mind are\nwww.answersingenesis.org\nwww.equip.org\nwww.creationevidence.org\nwww.creationresearch.org\nThere are more, but they have links on some of the sites I listed. If you are sincere in your question, please go to these sites, they will help in the fight against "Evil-Lution."