does wikipedia.org have an author?
928011
Wikipedia is written by the general public.  Anyone can edit a topic that is open for editing.   Which is why there can be incorrect information there sometimes.
226005
Wikipedia is a free reference.  Everybody should know how to use it by now.  \n\nI don't quote Wikipedia.  I'd rather give an honest opinion or answer about something rather than quoting something that's easily looked up.  \n\nNow something that's a little more challenging, I'll look up and quote.  But the Wikipedia stuff is too dang easy.
100029
when in doubt, go to wikipedia.
776787
G'day Graphix,\n\nThank you for your question.\n\nI am an active participant and admin on Wikipedia. One of the most important issues is verifiabiility and ensuring we have sources for everything in the articles. It is improving although we have a far bit of work to go.\n\nThe other issue is developing stable articles so that visitors see articles without vandalism. I understand that the boffins are working on that as we speak.\n\nI will be interested to see what others have to add.\n\nRegards
596122
Wikipedia is NOT recognised as a reliable source by academic institutions! Be careful what you quote from.\n\nIf you are searching for more conventionally reliable sources online, trust sites that end with .edu (educational institution) or .ac.uk (british academic institution) or, depending on how much you trust governments, .gov. \nThere are probably international equivalents to these, but the point is, anybody is free to contribute to wikipedia, even somebody whose dog is called maimilien robespierre.
320522
http://www.authorsonline.co.uk/New/Sample.asp?eBookID=228
739689
Really nice question.\n\nWikipedia is a free to edit online ecyclopedia ao basically anyone with a computer and a net connection can edit it. The articles available on wikipedia are typically not as structured and critically edited as any other printed encyclopedia or even Encarta but the sheer number of articles makes up for it.\n\nEncyclopædia Britannica employees About 400 (300 in Chicago, 100 worldwide) but they are not the ones who contribute to the articles .\n\nThe current version of Britannica was written by over 4,000 contributors, including noted scholars such as Milton Friedman, Michael DeBakey and Carl Sagan.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britannica\n\nEncarta simply bought in-circulation companies publishing encyclopedia and so the research work and contributions made by schoolars to these got incorporated into the Encarta.\n\nIn the late 1990s, Microsoft bought Collier's Encyclopedia and New Merit Scholar's Encyclopedia from Macmillan and incorporated them into Encarta. Thus the current Microsoft Encarta can be considered the successor of the Funk and Wagnalls, Collier, and New Merit Scholar encyclopedias.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encarta\n\nEncarta had started user editing early in 2005, the online Encarta started to allow users to suggest changes to existing articles.\n\nArticles are not immediately updated. Instead, user feedback is submitted to Encarta's editors for review, copyediting, and approval. Contributors are also not paid for their submissions.\n\nStill Encarta is very slow at updating its articles.\n\nHave a nice day .\n\n;)
154149
Wikipedia is fairly reliable. But it certsinly isn't the final word, and in a contest betwen Wikipedia and any other source I will always bet on the other source.\n\nBut what you read on Wikipedia is worth believing until you find a reason not to.
96089
I like wikipedia.com, but i don't know if it would have exactly what you are lookin for.
486466
use Wikipedia, a free online encyclopedia
734128
well wouldn't you know, there's a wikipedia page for that too!\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_Wikipedia
513604
One of the most useful websites is www.wikipedia.com
1062191
No and neither does Wikipedia.
688155
wikipedia is your friend
26795
http://en.wikipedia.com
560977
you can get a list of names on wikipedia.com, best website ever!
192881
Wikipedia has lots of info and external links.