I'm a man with 2 powerful sisters, that are Republicans, should I vote for Hillary in 2008?  Not sure here ...
927414
Don`t just vote for anyone for any reason except because you have studied and learned what they are going to do for the people. Understand them and their values. This next president will have a lot of important issues before them. Mainly the security of our country and our way of life. Choose someone that is intelligent enough to stop and think about what they are doing and the consequences of their actions. In these days and times party makes no difference !! Think about it they are not even agreeing with each other anymore. Don`t get hung up in the PARTY propaganda VOTE AMERICAN .\n\n\nI gave this a lot of thought before answering It is not pro republican democrat etc.. It is pro common sense and pro AMERICAN people. People are to hung up on party, race gender and sexual preference. We bring a lot of problems on ourselves because of this.  Your body is only a shell to the person you really are and the good or bad in your heart ...\n    I am a white middle class middle age female
359363
Hay Dude; don't get bent all out of shape but I think it is time that we had a woman in office. The old saying is (hell has no furry then that of a woman scorn) get my drift.I vote for Hillary Clinton.
969971
I would not be opposed to having a woman in office, however I would never vote for someone just because she is a woman.  I think that if she represents my interests well, then great, but if a man opposing her holds more similar views than her, he'd get my vote instead.
589225
I used to think that Hillary Rodham Clinton would make a fine, first-female POTUS. Now I don't know what to think. She's so busy cozying up to the Conservatives in this country that her policies have become blurred, and she has switched sides of the debate to some extent. Her having done that, I don't believe I can trust anything she says or does now. It's as though she is simply motivated to do anything in order to get elected.\n\nI would not vote for her. There are still some shining male hopefuls that seem to be on point (so far).\n\nIt's interesting that the moderate John McCain has recently stepped up to the Republican plate and gone to bat for Bush in a big way. I used to like him but now he just looks like an a**-kisser.
169046
I just became an American two weeks ago. I have lived here for 15 years and watched American politics since the Kennedy-Nixon debates. Nothing convinces me that one party or another is better or worse for the country.\n\nBut, anytime a party is in power for a second term they develop an arrogance that is NOT good for the country. \n\nI will vote Democrate just based on my theory that no party should be in power for more than 2 terms. This is a two party (or more) country after all. \n\nSo, if Hillary is the party's candidate, getting her and Bill in the same package won't be all that bad.\n\nI have to admit that there's not much after Hillary that would convince me to vote Democrate.
575406
Sure, I guess I would vote for the other parties candidate.  Never say never.  But if I were to pick somebody I would really want to run in the 2008 election it would be McCain.  He is the most likely Republican to win the primaries and lose to a Democrat.
481125
I would hope that I would not have to vote for either; but if I had to I would vote for Hillary. I have sworn that I will never ever vote for another Republican as long as I live. And quite frankly Condy should be tried for crimes agains humanity. She was national security advisor to the Bush boy when he invaded Iraq.
300715
A simple spelling error...but I can guarantee you this...If Hillary Rodham Clinton runs in '08...I will vote for her in a New York Minute...I WAS Republican, but since this last election, I switched parties....cuz Mr. Bush had ruined the image of the Grand Old Party...Hillary in '08...get out the vote!!
339341
I'd vote for Hillary, but I've never heard of Richardson.  She would need a really strong running mate and I don't think he's it since he doesn't have name recognition.
1151119
Your entire argument is valid and common among most young adults my age all over the country.  I really just do not want to see the Election to be a circus, with the Democratsz thinking they have found the key to their salvation after all this time by putting Hillary Clinton into office.  That would be the largest scale mistake EVER made in Elections History.  It really is choosing the lessor or two equals, and it's so hard to see the difference in the 2 candidates you are choosing from becuase they all sound the same.  Pray, I do, Pray for a smarter Nation to get its head out of the hole in the ground and pay attention to whats going on  out there.  I think the most important thing is to Vote, and clearly educate yourself on the people running before you rush to push a button come November 2008.
622996
Well it would be nice for us to join this century and finally vote in someone who is not male (someone non-white and non-Christian someday would be nice too).\nI am torn about supporting her though, she has moved so far to the right to try to have more appeal that she is losing her support on the left.  I will not vote for someone just because of her gender, I have to believe in her too.\n\nShe does have a good stance on women's issues and education (she's pro-choice, safe access to unbiased counseling and she is working on reducing abortions by making Emergency Contraception more available).\nHowever, she's conservative on Immigration\n\nI've linked to her issues (see below).
789568
Voting Democrat, because the GOP are all, or nearly all, greasy amoral scumbags who have auctioned off our country to corporate lobbyists.\n\nAm I thrilled with the Dems?  No.  Do they represent "my values"?  No.  But we have 2 viable choices in this country, and that basically always means choosing the lesser of two evils.  Just shows what a miserable system it is.\n\nP.S. If the Republicans are the party of "personal responsibility" (pause for laughter), then Bush ought to repeal his tax cuts for the mega-wealthy in order to pay for his hugely expensive war of choice.  Because it's really not a question of who will pay - WE will, sooner or later - and you do understand that these are RECORD deficits - it's a question of who hands us the bill, and I feel that it ought to be the guy who ran up the tab.  That sounds like "personal responsibility" to me.\n\nP.P.S. - I can't even begin to imagine the thought process that leads to the conclusion that the GOP is working in the interests of the "middle class worker."  Sorry if you don't like the term "scumbags," but it's descriptive of a fact.
1179235
LOL Good catchy one! \nYes I believe it is time for a woman to be in the WHITE House.. although Hillary kind of was w/ Bill hahaha.. So..I'd vote for any woman because I know it is time in history to move forward with the times!
384311
Neither, I'm an independent who votes for the man or woman running for office, regardless of party affiliation. I've found this takes a little more time and research divining the candidates real political stance, but usually it's time well worth it, because you really know who you're voting for, not just the party some candidates seem to hide behind.
699695
Yeah, I'm in, kind of... but everybody seems to be worried about Hillary. Why worry about her? If the first two men in line for president fail, guess what? Nancy Pelosi gets to be president. She is more likely to get there than Hillary.
455036
I would vote for her; she is very smart. I think she could run this country better than a man. LoL!!
10318
I wouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton in any year. It has nothing to do with her being a woman; I just don't like her liberal ideology.