List three methods that can be used to reduce noise pollution?
913131
1)  close your ears.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n2) close your ears.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n3) close your ears.
74590
Try to be more productive from now on instead of going straight here to ask a question.\nI found it INSTANTLY when I typed in "the effects of noise pollution" in google. Check my source(s)
197184
I do just for the simple reson that I can't stand silence. another alternative is using a fan. it will make just enough noise to break the silence. Good luck
876086
1. too many people\n2. too much pollution\n3. too much crime.
197216
How about RESPECT!!! Some things you could cover under this.\n-Not playing your car stereo at top volume assuming we all share your taste in music.\n-Not sharing idiotic cell phone conversations with entire restaurants, theatres, and grocery stores.\n-How to keep your trap shut in a theatre so we can all enjoy a movie
377683
Litter.\n\nI know it is probably not as dangerous to our health as Air Water or Noise but it is such a simple thing for people to take control of.\n\nDrives me nuts to see someone just toss there garbage out the car window or to the gutter when they are walking. \n\nPigs.
180843
Environmental pollution:\n=========================\nRelease of environmental contaminants, generally resulting from human activity. Carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide , chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) ,and nitrogen oxides produced by industry and motor vehicles are common air pollutants.\n\nSound Pollution:\n================================\nPresence of unwanted sound.\n\nThere are many other types of pollutions.
592913
a box fan works great a small fountain or even a fish tank with a water filter heavy curtains and rugs. also weather strip around doors and put a door guard will help on noise and cooling and heating bills.
373023
Ultrasonic cleaners might be the best solution.\n\nHere is an excerpt from the source listed below: \n\nAlthough a range of possible alternative products is available today, experience has shown that substitution of TRI is not easy and even not feasible for a number of specific cases, either for technical or economical reasons. For all cases, substitution of TRI needs a thorough evaluation of all process aspects. For this reason we intend to work with the authorities in order to prevent a blanket implementation of forced substitution, and allow sustainable and continued safe use of TRI. \n\nThe alternatives you will probably consider first are the chlorinated solvents perchloroethylene (PER) and methylene chloride (MC). They match closest the technical features of TRI, such as non-flammability, high solvency power, a wide range of material compatibility and excellent drying and recycling properties.\n\nBeside PER and MC, you have probably also heard about other alternatives such as aqueous (water-based) alkaline systems, flammable solvents (e.g. hydrocarbons or modified alcohol based formulations), supercritical CO2 or hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), etc.\n\nIt is impossible to say definitively which technology is best. That depends on your specific application, on what you are cleaning, which materials you want to remove, the cleanliness required, the variability of the parts cleaned, the throughput to be achieved, the cycle times, etc. \n\nFor example, for the cleaning of parts between two water-based manufacturing steps (e.g. galvanising), aqueous systems may be better, since parts are put into water phase again later and no energy-intensive drying step to remove the water is required. \n\nIf you need to have very clean and dry surfaces (for coating or surface hardening, for example) and if you have a variety of different metals or blind holes, narrow distances and very fine orifices or a lot of residual oil to clean, hydrocarbons or aqueous systems may not clean and dry well enough. In these cases, chlorinated solvents will offer most often the best solution as they are compatible with most materials, have a high cleaning power, are easy to dry, don't leave residual films and are easy to recycle with high quality by distillation. In addition, chlorinated solvents are today best suited to be used in modern closed systems with minimal losses. Their ecological performance has very much increased and, when used in well-operated metal cleaning systems, they outperform aqueous cleaning as long as drying is required. This has been shown by a Life Cycle Analysis carried out by Ecobilan. \n\nPER comes closest to TRI in technical performance and is often the first choice candidate as an alternative to TRI. However, it shows clear inherent technical differences, which need to be taken into consideration. On one side, PER offers a lower volatility and therefore is advantageous to minimise emissions in closed equipment. On the other side, PER has a lower solvency power and is therefore normally used at a higher cleaning temperature to achieve similar performance. This may raise concerns regarding the compatibility with specific metal working fluids and temperature-sensitive parts. \n\nMethylene chloride (MC) shows excellent cleaning properties already at low temperatures, favouring the cleaning of temperature sensitive parts. However, its high volatility makes emission control more difficult and requires special equipment.\n\nHydrofluorocarbons (HFC) and hydrofluorocarbon ethers (HFCE) are very expensive and show very limited solvency power. A thorough evaluation of the global warming potential is also required to choose the adequate product.
871526
You can try building a sound isolating drum riser. There are commercial product s available:\nhttp://www.auralex.com/sound_isolation_platfoam/sound_isolation_platfoam.asp\nOr you can try styrofoam or similar (and cheaper) alternatives.
611227
1] Text Aloud\n2] Microsoft reader\n3] Pdf Reder\n\n\nDragon Speech Recognition\n\nused world over by people..\n\ncheckout
1051489
This site has a lot of products:\n\nhttp://www.soundprooffoam.com/echo-absorber.html
983871
its not as effective as you may think, your gonna need to be able to hear the other person over the noise. may i suggest standing next to an older running generator, as the noise both audible and inaudible should scramble a long range mic.\n\nbut as stated above try moving the conversation to a more secure area, be it in a large drainage pipe, or a vehicle. any place is more secure than out in the open
689020
1.  Water Purification - Plumming - Toiletts\n2.  Waste Management - Sanitary way to deal with waste <human, and other waste>\n3.  Transportation.\n4.  Medicine - Vaccines \n5.  Population Control\n6.  Education
396452
1. reduce the force at which the surfaces press together.\n2. allow one surface to slide on top of a film of air rather than the other surface(a la hovercrafts and air hockey)\n3. reduce the roughness of the surface by polishing or using lube.\n\n***I know... they're more than one way... lol***
438858
Well, that makes no sense.\n\nThere is no teaching certificate for noise pollution...unless you want to count classroom management practical applications....\n\nDo you mean you want to go back to college and earn a degree? Then you want to major in civil engineering. If your nearest college to where you live doesn't have it, they can direct you to an appropriate program at another college.
99583
Remove all speed bumps from the parking lots and put them in the hallways and/or sports fields.\n\nAttach all hallway/lounge furniture to the ceiling.\n\nBrick up doorways to all administrative offices.\n\nSprinkle instant mashed potatos all over the sports fields, preferably with a reasonable expectation of rain in the next few days.\n\nHide an old cell phone in the ceiling or a plant and call it frequently throughout the day.  Preferably during times of quiet.\n\nRound-up.  (Draw your own conclusions and offer to help the maintenance guy in advance!)