A Question regarding Religion and Science.?
918683
Who is it that made those rules of the Uiniverse?
265122
Please read the Bible,upanishads,Gita(sorry if I am forcing any religion)but religion is billion times stronger and straight forward when it comes to explaining things,anything under the sun)in asimple and HUMBLE way.\n\nregards\n\nthanks
873708
Dear Atheist for Christians Banned:\n\nI find in our Category, here, that the great wealth of ideas and what has been learned is seldom shared. Rather, we shout small bytes at each other when, at least I, would prefer to get deeper into experiences and the lessons contained therein. Exploration about God is appropriate for the Religion/Spirituality Forum. Are we offering each other something of depth and richness to contemplate?  What is available to us - from each other?\n\nYes, I have read many articles on Evolution.  I like to dabble in Physics just enough to "stay up" with the latest information.\n\nAtheism has demanded, recently, that God be proven. They seem to feel that Christians are duped!  Yet, Atheism leads to our not acknowledging there is anything beyond or more than physical matter and human Intellect. Nothing more. No other concepts integrated .  Just Intellect examining a world of physical matter.\n\nScience, however,  has decided God can not be disproved or thrown away, after all. Physics has found itself smack up against Him and is desperate to prove Him. (String theories (all 5) or M-Theory). But I tell you, God will never be a mathematical formula.  It takes the soul or spirit-mind within,  to bring forth its Knowledge of its Creator (which it shares with the divine Presence).  Only soul/spirit can direct the Scientist to proper understanding of the Order of Creation. Science is, after all, inspiration ; inspired first - to learn of it's world and our Self. But, then, at best, you have still a cold calculation from Science - about the Created and it's Creator - with no experience of His divine nature; the ecstasy, the unlimited-ness, the Unopposed force of the Creative Being, of Who we are a part. \n\nThe Intellect is of logic and reasoning. It deduces and judges. God is Knowledge and Knowing. \n\nWe should be open to thoughts that behind the Intellect lies our soul or Spirit: The Seat of all Knowledge. Until we understand soul/spirit - we can not know our Self. \n\nIntellect is a mental exercise. It changes, shifts, and alters its thought processes.  But, Knowledge is unalterable.\n\nThe Evolution of Earth contains the Creator existing along with it.  This is Integration. \n\nBest regards, Lana
239757
There are many medical (and other fields) researchers with a deep faith in God.  The question is irrelevant in that their field is a scientific endeavor, and their beliefs are a matter of faith.  Both are compatible and they are not against each other as the questioner seems to imply.
1007300
christian science is an oxymoron. \n\nthey're based on two different methods.\n\nchristians believe in the reason, and then observe, scientists observe first and then try to find the reason.\n\nchristianity is a religion, not science, it will never be science, ever. \n\nbut you can believe in both. it certainly happens. \n\nremember, one is not necessarily better than the other, they're just different and i for one subscribe to science.
36695
O.K. admiralbob! I'm glad your not in charge of everything. Everyone wants to prove how things work, but they can't answer the question as to who made it all happen.....Anyway I've got broadband but the download is taking a minute so based off of others speculation and the website that I observed, I would say SURE THING. God is intelligent so why wouldn't he use science he created it? But yeah! They should use it to teach if they have found that proof! It would really back up the bible too.
676909
I don't get the way you have phrased your question.  Why does it have to be God OR Science - why not God AND Science?\n\nHere's the deal: It is just ignorant and intellectually dishonest to reject or ignore the work of thousands upon thousands of scientists who are trying to unlock the secrets of the universe.  But considering the origin of these secrets is a philosophical, not a scientific, matter.  So listen to the scientists, who have devoted their lives to study, and learn well what they have to say about our origins and destiny.  But listen also to philosophers, theologians, and others who also have something to say about our origins and destiny.  The "correct" answer - as our limited minds perceive it - is probably a combination of the best that all of these sources have to offer.
242769
Science is all about understanding the universe we live in.  If God created this universe, isn't science then just an attempt to understand what God created?  Science and religion are not necessarily mutually exclusive, but problems do arise when scientific conclusions and religious beliefs do not match, and should that be the case it's up to you to decide what you feel is the most correct answer.
748292
this is a very wierd statement....\nscientist do not strugle with religion... they do their science.\nI do not understand your point.... science is not interested in religion at all.... it is all about understanding the place where we live.... \nreligion, ... well it is up to you to decide what role it plays in your life. '
869180
The only faith required for science is the belief that the physical universe is at least partially knowable. Where gaps are filled in by conjecture, scientists are busy trying to prove or disprove the conjectures - no one takes it on faith. The fact that science may see things differently next year makes it very different from religion, where any change in the dogma leads to accusations of heresy and other histrionics. \n\nScience is also willing to admit it doesn't know everything, where religion expects you to accept it as absolute truth. Your understanding of science is very distorted; I hope you will manage to gain some education in that area.
838832
Conclusion? There's no conclusion to scinece, it is the study of everything, we'll never finish studying science and reach some conclusion.\n\nMy conclusion about religion is that it is delusional. I was just wondering if your question had an unstated subtext?
407385
both are plausible. faith and science cannot disprove the other. you can try all you want to use God to explain science and use science to explain God but in the end you will find that science happens through the will of God.\n\nkeep in mind that humans have souls and animals do not. perhaps our souls (something not bound by the laws of science) are the image of God while our physical appearances are only our animalistic aspect. \n\nwe are God's creation, but also made in their image.
1111838
the bible is something like "believe but do not search". But if you read between the lines you could get a scientific answer.
152747
Actually religion is much older than science. What the ancients could not explain otherwise was attributed to a creation of a higher power (read God). Scientists are slowly discovering the different facets of this higher power by applying science and technology
1082718
The existence of god cannot be proved or disproved. It is a matter of belief, not of science which is only concerned with provable events.
991994
Could you clarify your question?\n\n\nEDIT:\nRead the answer carefully from Leviter_atin... It is good.\n\nReally look at the website s/he provided.\n\nAlso, I recommend you look at at least one book about evolution- "Finding Darwin's God," by Ken Miller.  Miller is a Christian and a cell biologist.  He does a VERY good job of explaining how science/evolution are NOT incompatible with Christianity.
482562
The theory of evolution (assuming you are lumping this in with the physics of the creation of matter) has the same initiation problem as the Religious one.\n\nWhere did the first matter come from?\nWhere did God come from?\n\nBoth 'sides' will say there has simply been [insert your object here]\n\nPeace out