Indicate what consideration Sainsbury's need to take into account in term of legal.?
918212
Are you referring to legal as part of a PEST or SPELTEC analysis?  There are many laws governing business from health and safety to consumer to employment to competition - a good starting place is www.spideybiz.co.uk which gives you links to the best sites for this information.
762548
which type of information u required from the company law board.Regarding rules on articles and memorandum of company? for which company u requires this information?
537496
I would imagine you would need to be an employee who can order?
1019069
Employee and public liabilty insurance is a requirement for the occupier of any business premises. It is there to ensure she can meet her liabilities if an accident occurs. Not alot of people know that occupiers of all premises are liable if someone is injured on their property, even residential owners. The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (I think that's the year) makes it impossible for an occupier of business premises to attempt to exclude or limit their liability for injury sustained on the premises. Whereas an owner of residential premises can do so i.e by placing a warning sign Saying for example THE OCCUPIER ACCEPTS NO LIABILITY FOR ANY INJURY WHILE ON THE PREMISES. There are alot of technical points to note with this; particularly in relation to children, however, so be careful and always seek proper advice.\n\nAs an employer she also suffers from something called 'vicarious liability'. This basically means that she is liable for the acts of her employees while they are performing duties assosciated with their work. i.e say someone comes into the hairdressers who is a celebrity (david beckham for arguments sake) a trainee junior gets asked to dye his hair for him and he has an allergic reaction to the dye causing his head to swell to the point where he can no longer see, hence stopping him from playing football. As the employer she is jointly liable for any claim that david, or real madrid, may make. This is reasoned by the simple and logical point that the employer sees the sole benefit of the employees work and so should bear the burden of the responsibility for that work.\n\nAs far as I personally am aware one is only legally required to take out public liability insurance under U.K law although it has been several years since I completed my legal studies on this particular subject and I may be mistaken!! It is always advisable to take out the employees insurance though; as I have already stated the owner of the business is vicariously liable for the acts of the employee and she would be the first person any decent lawyer came after as 1- she is likely to be insured 2- she is likely to have more money than the actual offender in the event of no insurance. Depending on the type of business this is(sole trader, partnership, limited company) may mean that she could, potentially, lose her house and everything else of value in the event of a claim without it.\n\nHope that helps.
804633
Companies house, there a plc (public Limited Company) they have to supply this information!
1164311
Depends.  If it is food there are food brokers.  Otherwise, you could probably just call manufacturers direct.
142326
Any first year law student can tell you there are 3 basic elements to any contract;  (1) offer; (2) acceptance of the offer; and (3) consideration or an exchange of value.  The terms of the acceptance must mirror the terms of the offer.\n\nOf course, contract law is much more complex than that.  Some contracts must be in writing and the parties must have the legal or mental capaity to enter into a contract.  But offer, acceptance and consideration are the basic elements to any contract.
417851
Try here:\n\nhttp://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/webpage/98016
509090
I am not able to understand your question clearly. \nContractual liability is the liability arising out of the contract and spelt out in the contract. The contract may be for supplying an item or service or doing or not doing certain acts etc etc.\nIf A has placed an order on B  for supply of ten footballs for a match to be played and the date of delivery is clearly spelt out as 10th May and the match is on 11th May and the party B fails to supply the ten foot balls by 1oth May or supplies only 5 nos by 10th May there is failure on the part of B to meet his contractual responsiblity as well as liability.\nThe contract may say in such an even B has to pay a penalty  to A plus the actual cost of procurement of the foot balls from another source at a higher price even because of emergency etc.Consequential loss clause may also be there.\n\nThe other liability I have not heard of It seems to be mis spelt. May be a liability out side of the contract but still a liability.\n\nSimilarly failure to pay for the footballs IN TIME as agreed is a contractual on the partv of A.
997380
Give one months notice, and you should be fine, its consumer contract so any clause will be subject to reasonableness test in schedule 2 of ucta. (unfair contract terms act 1977)\n\nWhere a contract has very onerous terms then those terms should specifically be brought to your attention. Even if they were the law will not allow the inequality of bargaining power since you are contracting on their standard terms, so every clause has to be reasonable.\n\nIf the service is substantially different to what is promised then that is a repudiatory breach of contract and you should be entitled to rescind the contract, effectively be brought back into the position before the contract.\n\nI would suggest give notice to terminate on the grounds that they have failed to perform their end of the bargain, if they do not agree you may go to a solicitor and negotiate that way. It depends how much money is involved, whether you should go for small claims or not. \n\nWrite a letter to the company detailing your issues, and say you have all evidence in writing, and wait and see, more than likely they will back out. Even if they issue proceeding from what you have described you have a good counterclaim.
210637
go to a lawyer with the details.
774974
Hi Jacq,\n\nI have not heard of this, but if that is the case then you do have extenuating circumstances and that would be given full consideration.\n\nI suggest you contact the Guildford School of Law. They will have all the info you need.\n\nGood luck.
992179
it depends, should consult a lawyer
960150
Please see a lawyer, a private Ltd  company may have some exemption.\n\nLaws can vary from place to place or it may be governed by companies specific charter, the company can change the charter under certain conditions.
725076
Well, you need to use common sense really.\nThere was a case where a boy died from drinking a can of coke he bought from a newsagent. It was because a rat peed on the coke can lid whilst it was in storage at the newagents. Of course the dude was sued for negligence.\n\nSo you must take care when storing items and have a system that allows you to check sell by dates regularly. You should speak to insurance companies and get relevant business/law textbooks out of your library.
1127239
An Act to define and amend the law relating to the sale of goods\n\nWHEREAS it is expedient to define and amend the law relating to the sale of goods;\n\n\n\nIn this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject of context,-\n\n    (1) "buyer" means a person who buys or agrees to buy goods;\n\n    (2) "delivery" means voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another;\n\n    (3) goods are said to be in a "delivered state" when they are in such state that the buyer would under the contract be bound to take delivery of them;\n\n    (4) "document of title to goods" includes bill of lading dock-warrant, warehouse keeper's certificate, wharfingers' certificate, railway receipt, 4[multimodal transport document,] warrant or order for the delivery of goods and any other document used in the ordinary course of business as proof of the possession or control of goods or authorising or purporting to authorise, either by endorsement or by delivery, the possessor of the document to transfer or receive goods thereby represented;\n\n    (5) "fault" means wrongful act or default;\n\n    (6) "future goods" means goods to be manufactured or produced or acquired by the seller after making of the contract of sale;\n\n    (7) "goods" means every kind of moveable property other than actionable claims and money; and includes stock and shares, growing crops, grass, and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale;\n\n    (8) A person is said to be "insolvent" who has ceased to pay his debts in the ordinary course of business, or cannot pay his debts as they become due, whether he has committed an act of insolvency or not;\n\n    (9) "mercantile agent" means a mercantile agent having in the customary course of business as such agent authority either to sell goods, or to consign goods for the purposes of sale, or to buy goods, or to raise money on the security of goods;\n\n    (10) "price" means the money consideration for a sale of goods;\n\n    (11) "property" means the general property in goods, and not merely a special property;\n\n    (12) "quality of goods" includes their state or condition;\n\n    (13) "seller" means a person who sells or agrees to sell goods;\n\n    (14) "specific goods" means goods identified and agreed upon at the time a contract of sale is made; and\n\n    (15) expressions used but not defined in this Act and defined in the Indian Contract Act, 1872, have the meaning assigned to them in that act.\n\n#### LINKS : -\n\nhttp://www.laws4india.com/acts/sga/sga_idx.asp\n\nhttp://www.helplinelaw.com/bareact/index.php?dsp=saleofgoods\n\nhttp://www.indialawinfo.com/bareacts/soga.html
814699
Get in touch with your local Trading Standards there number should be in your Telephone directory. I work in retail and they have an obligation to supply to the customer. Without you they wouldnt be able to continue trade.