difference between "can-could", "will-would", "will-shall"?
914335
can and will are stronger ACTION verbs and seems to be used for the present (eg, i will go shopping later. i can climb that tree) could and would are less active and tend to be used more for regret, possibility or past tense. (eg, i could have done shopping yesterday. i would climb that tree if i weren't sick.) and will and shall are interchangeable :)
1123605
A sentence can stand on its own, but a clause cannot.\n\nLet's use my sentence as an example:\n\n"A sentence can stand on its own."  That is a sentence, and works with or without the additional clause.\n\n"but a clause cannot."  That makes no sense on its own, right?
835260
'In order to'\nOR\n'So that'
964907
Could.\nA & C only work in present tense, which "asked" is not.\n\nP.S. "if my answers ARE correct"--never use future in a subordinate clause.
975402
c is the correct answer. The helping verbs are    has, have had, do, does, did, be, am, is, are, was, were, been, can, could, shall, should, will, would, may, might, must, being
36610
'I am hungry \nEats your hand \nKeeps the other for tomorrow \nAnd your head \nFor the days of party.'\n\nYes, this doesn't make much sense in that order, but different languages use words in different orders than other languages.
956823
Either *could* be grammatically correct, but they have different meanings.  In the first example, you are suggesting that travel is possible, but not definite.  "I don't definitely travel tomorrow; I might wait until the next day" is a grammatical sentence.  In the second example, you are clearly saying that you will not travel--it is definite.\n\nBut the first version is awkward, even if that is the meaning you intend.  It would be far better to say, "I may not travel," if that's what you mean.\n\nGood luck!!
1061387
"Eh bien, je le ferai peut-être."\nOR\n"Eh bien, peut-être que je le ferai."\nOR\n"Eh bien, il se peut que je le fasse."\n\nIn other words, you can't simply translate the word "will" (implying the future tense) into French, because there is not such word. In English, the future tense is composed of two words: e.g. "I will do it." In French, it's just one. e.g. "Je le ferai." You can't break "ferai" into two parts like you can "will do" in English. You have to use the whole thing.
936277
Both 'will' and 'going to' are in the future tense. I need to know a little bit more about the sentence to see the full context of what you are asking.
512543
Can I what? \n\nBe?- no.\nScrew?- depends.\nKill?- maybe.\nBefriend?- yes.
174347
I am sorry. There is a mighty difference between\n'I can' and 'I want to'.\nEverybody has his limits.
407094
"What if I can"     Stop using quotation marks to define the context of a thought?         \n\n"I will" being a question to yourself?????????????????\n\nRev. Steven\n\n   Surely you have more of an intellect than this shows, but more,,,, Hopefully you realize, the rest of us do!!!
538319
A -> B\nB -> C\n...\nT -> U\nYou (U) -> V\nV -> W\n\nSo, You -> V
930408
going to - planning to do something (in the South we sometimes say "fixing to!"\nwill - definitely will do something\n\ns
578605
yes\nyes\nyes, within reasonible limits\nyes\nyes\nyes
823256
A. RY,rY\nB.Ry\nc.Ry,RY,ry,rY\nd. r,Y,ry\njust the differerent possiblities of rs and ys
670165
Both are acceptable.\n\nhttp://www.m-w.com/dictionary/plead