Was Landis disqualified?
928679
Landis is still listed as the winner of the 2006 Tour de France but is not considered by Tour officials to be the champion.\n\nHowever pending an investigation the decision of whether to strip him of his title will be made by the International Cycling Union.\n\nYou can find out about this case on the link below:\n\nhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/landis_affair_complete\n\nThe following websites will have breaking news on this as soon as a decision by the UCI is reached:\n\nhttp://www.uci.ch/Templates/UCI/UCI5/layout.asp?MenuID=MTYxNw\n\nhttp://www.cyclingnews.com/\n\nIn the meantime hold on to your betting slip.
737274
Of course they will, they paid $51 mil just to talk to him, not signing him would be the biggest mistake since Napolean sold Louisiana.  He might not end up being worth the money, like Irabu, but they cannot just flush that kind of money down the drain.
543167
I asked Gary Thorne (ESPN commentator and USA Today columnist) a couple of weeks ago regarding this on a USA Today chat.  He mentions Daniel Briere but goes on to say it was way too early to determine the Conn Smythe winner.  It's probably still a little early to guess until we have the finals set this evening (or tomorrow morning).  If I had to give my answer right away, I'd go with either of the following:  Daniel Briere, Eric Staal, Cory Stillman, Cam Ward, Dwayne Rolosson or Ryan Miller.
1170251
You must have been watching a different game than I was. The elbow on McBride that took him out of the field bleeding was no question a red card. However, the referee wanted to Make things even and ejected Mastreonie on a foul that should have been a yellow.  I'm not arguing Pope's ejection, he should have know that he was playing with a yellow card. \n\nIf you can say, that the referee did a good job officiating? Then maybe you are being the ignorant dummy.
1139808
PACQUIAO WAS DISQUALIFIED....\nHIS URINE TEST FAILED, TOO MANY DRUGS WERE DISCOVERED ON IT. \n\nYOU DONT GET THAT, WATCH TV COMMERCIALS IN THE PHILIPPINES
573977
713 stupid.\nbut that may not be the right answer in a couple of days.\nBut if Juan Pierre keeps making those catches it may be a week or two.
1126816
It took me until 41. Am I disqualified?
739051
Well, rightfully so.\n\nVerlander was the clear cut winner for the award.  Had Liriano and Papelbon both stayed healthy, it may have been a different story, but that wasnt the case.\n\nIt was nice to see someone with my name win something too!
1098484
*sigh* \nfirst let's get our fact straight.. loomis was not fired. loomis was done with his contract and did not want to renew with hendrick as he wanted to go back to his roots. he wanted to basically go home. i don't think any of hendrick wantedt o see him go, esp jeff.\n\nsecond, i keep getting this "give them time stuff" well to me time has done come and passed. it's time for steve "pop-tart" letarte to put a bra on and go home. he's just not getting it. he's making stupid decisions, bad judgement calls and rookie mistakes. they keep saying it's communication. well if your seasoned, 4 time champion, driver tells you the car is loose than LISTEN. don't try to tell him it's the track and it will chnage.. NO LISTEN to your driver. the driver can drive. you ar the crew chief and are supposed to make the calls to change the car. \n\njeff has tried taking some of the blame for it. he's said that it's his deal. he's the one who has got to tell them what's up. well, everytime i listen in on the scanner he is, and steve is blowing him off or not listening or something something ridiculous.. like oh say touch the wedge for a little bit of tightness. NEGATIVE you only touch the wedge when it's extreme. \n\nhis over the wall team has gotten a lot better. i just really have not seen enough imporvement in letarte to say keep going. if he was showing something, sure, but there is NOTHING. i think they should really look into bringing darien grubb up from the 48.. crew chiefs, esp good ones, are a hot commodity..and if they don't use that man he could be up and out somewhere else.\n\nobviously it would be difficutl to change midway through the season, but if he doens't get his rear up back in the points it's not like he's got anything to lose.
355831
I don't know why this question is asked so often.  Jan Ullrich is fat.  He is trying to ride into form.  But he is not as young as he used to be.  I put my money on either Floyd Landis or Ivan Basso.  Floyd has a stronger team than Ivan.  Both are good in the time trial.  I would give the edge to Floyd.
181517
Kenesaw Mountain Landis (1920-1944) \nA. B. "Happy" Chandler I (1945-1951) \nFord Frick (1951-1965) \nWilliam Eckert (1965-1968) \nBowie Kuhn (1969-1984) \nPeter Ueberroth (1984-1989) \nBart Giamatti (1989) \nFay Vincent (1989-1992) \nBud Selig (1992-present; held title of "acting commissioner" from 1992-1998)
554098
he didn't buy Tony Raines' rdie, he got Cope's.  he said last night (mon) on inside nextel cup on speed that Cope's team presented the idea to mikey.  by selling their entry Cope's team made more money than if they ran the 10 laps the usually do.  Mikey mentioned something about contract obligations with NAPA for being in the race.  \n\nall together i don't think it is a good idea to let guys sell their entry but like ken schrader said what a guy decides to do with his qualifing spot is up to him.  i really think you should qualify in your car and race your car not fail at qualifing and then buy someone elses.  it may be legal by NASCAR rules, but i am not sure it is very sportsman like.
399763
no, he was suspended (red card last match)
527419
Crew chief Richard ``Slugger'' Labbe was suspended for four races and fined $25,000 on Tuesday for using an illegal part on Dale Jarrett's car at Richmond International Raceway. \n\nNASCAR officials discovered the sway bar on Jarrett's car was illegally mounted when the No. 88 Ford passed through Saturday night's pre-race inspection in Richmond.
1006736
Hey Sabrina,\n\nThe referee happened to that game. He ruined what was looking like being a really good match.Now I am an Aussie that outside of my Socceroo's has followed Italy loyally since before the 2002 WC. The disallowed goal was a bad decision, I do not see the offside play that was cited, however The USA rose to the occasion today and the bad sportsmanship shown by De Rossi (sorry if I got that wrong) deserved the red card and he made it very hard on the rest of the team. There was no need for that and I was embarrassed for the Italian side. The referee's handling of the entire game was one of the most pitiful and inconsistent displays thus far.I hope he is demoted. It would have been a great game without his presence.
1031071
They didn't qualify(~~)
72383
I disagree on the Champ Bailey fumble, there was no good camera angle to confirm it went out of the enzone and not in the field of play. The Samuel/Lelie "defensive" pass intereference...total BS...definately should have been on Lelie if anyone...but certainly...7 pts didn't make a difference anyway with all the turn overs. That being said, no...the officiating was not of the caliber of the playoffs if only based on that BS play alone!