which one is crueler..mr. saddam hussein or mr bush??
925130
LOL, I believe it depends on which one killed you!!
101504
george bush is garbage. he is prejudiced and when I met him he had foul body odor
1106049
Nobody deserves to die.\nThe difference between George W. Bush Jr. and Saddam is that Bush represents the majority of a people, while Saddam Hussein only represented himself.
1120292
Bush, very interesting article here about it.  http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history
89825
well, the environment of this wasn't created by Bush, he mearly reacted to the situation, the only way he could. He of course was first provoked into it by 9/11.  Then the bad intellegence he got, didn't help matters any.  Everything that Saddam said he wouldn't do, he continued throughout the Clinton era, because he knew there would be a blind eye turned his way.
621128
BUSH IS EVIL<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
732084
Well, we know better now that Kissinger and Blair said yesterday that the Iraq war cannot be won.  Sadly,  Saddam was the right man for the job.  We need to find another like him but nicer to the u.s. or just put saddam back in.  Only a dictator can control those sectarian fools.  And we would love to do it but that would not be PC.  Well, I volunteer yourself Mr. Erudite, I think you could do the job.   Anyone else here nominate Mr,. E?
760504
Nixon and Clinton .......... and none of these two president committed a worst crime than bush\n\nsorry ...... i sincerely apologise and admitted my mistake as an honorable liberal do ..... SORRY! should have studied my history
47402
BOTH ARE HORRIBLE, BUT LITTLE BUSH HAS DONE FAR MORE DAMAGE WITH  BOGUS WMD WARS OF CHOICE, WARRANTLESS WIRETAPS, ETC.
923226
see, you're slightly incorrect here....\n\nBush 2 (and for the record, sequals are always worse), didnt learn squat from anything ever, especially foreign history, but all the ppl around him like cheney and rove did learn something, they learned what happens after a war, and they realized how you can manipulate the masses during a war, and in doing so, you can profit from it financially. \n\nbush and his buddies just looked for the quickest way to do what they wanted, how they wanted, and didnt care about anything else. they're not even pretending to care about our country. their regime is the most thinly veiled corruption ever. dont get me wrong, Saddam was a tyrant, but there are worse, and more dangerous out there, why didnt we go after them?
152498
Bush brings chaos to anything he touches. He really should be deported to Iraq, and made to serve with those that he sent to their deaths for a made-up cause.
661858
IT'S VERY EASY TO KNOW THAT GEORGE. W. BUSH IS THE WORST EVER.  ALL YOU HAVE TO DO TO KNOW IT IS BE CONSCIOUS.
397001
I think Saddam was a cruel pig, but the day to day life of the typical Iraqi was definitely better before the US got involved.\n\nWith Saddam, Iraqis had water and power, no suicide bombings, and no insurgency.\n\n----------------------------\nPS - Many people forget that it was the US that put Saddam in power to begin with in the 1960's. It was also the US that supported Saddam's use of WMD's when he was fighting against Iran. Brutal dictator? Definitely, but the blood is also on our hands.
369795
Here's what I think...\n\nBush > Saddam > Laden > Chimp. \n\n(In intelligence)\n\nHere's my reasoning\n\n\n1. Bush goes in first because he is the president of the USA. You have to be smart to be a president. If you deny this, you are a Bush basher who has no facts and are simply an idiot(Not talking to anyone specifically).\n\n2. Saddam goes next because he strategically went into power as a dictator. Smart.\n\n3. Osama is third because he heads a large terrorist organization and hasn't been found yet.\n\n4. The chimp comes last because, if you're not stupid, you'd know that a chimp is a lesser evolutionary stage of man. Therefore, it is not as smart. \n\n\nOf course, I know the answer you are looking for is that the chimp is the smartest. But I'm not going to say that because it's blatantly incorrect.
481068
Umm...Saddam did some really bad things during his reign as ruler of Iraq. Whether Bush is a criminal or not will be determined by history.
650163
You're not bush bashing? Too bad. i thought i'd found a kindred spirit. Lol. Anyways, if i believed in a heaven and hell, i'd say Bush would be going to the deepest circle of hell. The one reserved for the Hitler's and the Stalin's. Though he's not quite as bad as those two, he still belongs in that category.
752398
LOL! This question gave me a good laugh. \n\nConsidering the total amount of destruction, carnage, horrors and grief he has caused in Iraq caused by his impractical policies, I would say he is more destructive. \n\nI think that more Iraqis died than the number of Japanese in the Hiroshima/Nagasaki atomic bombing. \n\nSo, Bush's are more destructive in a way.