Is it legal in the UK to watch ponography on the net?
918054
yes as long as it is adult.
904502
The program you are looking for can be found at http://www.oatmealmedia.net\n\nAs for laws about this. . .  it works like this. . . .\n\nIt is not illegal to view someone without their permission on yahoo because they are willingly broadcasting to a public forum. It is only illegal if you give them a trojan and open their cam (turn it on) for them. When someone willingly broadcasts their image over the internet, then their expectation for privacy is gone. Thus privacy laws do not apply. You can also record the images that come across your computer. This too is perfectly legal. Infact your computer record much of your internet activity without you even knowing it. It is only illegal, if you redistribute the recording without the consent of the webcam user, and even that is not a criminal act (you won't go to jail) but you can be sued by the cam user for copyright violation.\n\nI hope this is more informative than the other posts. Alot of people will tell you that it is illegal, but research it for yourself and you will see that I am correct in what I say.
847991
well thats pretty much the definition of downloading. go to google video and search it. go to download for windows/mac and download it if its there. its legal.
420026
Unless it is realeased by the manufacturer or owner of the game for the internet, yes it is illegal. If you made your own roms, ie figured out how to take the game from the gameboy to your comptuer yourself, it is not illegal as long as you dont put it up on the internet.
440111
Errr... is that legal?
576757
No, The cartoons there are for downloading, and if you really think its illegal just watch T.V.
427623
It is probably against the law to view these website and you could be in serious trouble. My advice is too either forget about the possiblity of seeing sites that are banned or go work in another country that allows you to read all of the news and not just part of it.
729250
The UK is home to around 20% of all the world's overt CCTV cameras (roughly four million, or one for every fourteen or fifteen people).  However these figures don't consider covert cameras, such as those mounted in police patrol cars.  Nor do they acknowledge public webcams or domestic CCTV.\n\nFor what it's worth the majority of these systems are passively monitored until needed, but with year-by-year advances in pattern recognition technology (read: AI) there'll be a greater degree of automated active monitoring.\n\nAnd with respect to your talk of black boxes in cars...  It's just a matter of time.  The current trend toward more and more toll roads will require some kind of convergent monitoring, and little black boxes with GPS capability will go a long way toward allowing that.  (Red Ken Livingstone would just LOVE one of those on YOUR car, whether you live in London or otherwise.)\n\nFurthermore, the capacity of CCTV to "catch" criminals is completely overshadowed by the courts inability to effectively prosecute them.  Any suggestion that CCTV makes our streets safer is a myth busted wide open by independant, authorative observation (that's you and me).\n\n(Do you really believe the streets are safer to walk these days?  I don't.  I can see it with my own eyes, and I don't have to watch the broadcast news or read the papers every single day to appreciate it.  CCTV will NOT protect you, me, our friends or our families.  It does not deter.  At best it affords a visual record of past events, and at worse it offers a false sense of security.)\n\nAs for this Government's fascination with ID cards and greater immigration and anti-terrorism controls, any monitoring technology that may benefit that end will definitely be employed for tasks beyond its original purpose; this is the norm.  At great cost to the taxpayer, and with a contrasting threat to civil liberties.  (Read: we're paying toward an Orwellian future.)\n\nThere's a pattern forming here, and never before has the word 'monitoring' taken on such an ominous undertone.\n\nOh, and that old classic line of "If you've got nothing to hide then you've nothing to fear" is a fallacy.  We, all of us, strive to be private citizens.  We, all of us, have something to hide, whether it's our sexual preference, secret crush, betting addiction, bank ballance or exam results.\n\nThe plain and simple truth of it is that we, all of us, have something to fear from a Big Brother state.  Oppression is born of an ideal, yet matures through ignorance and denial.  But even though history is a damn fine teacher we so easily forget the past.
844022
http://www.atuk.co.uk/webcams/
1139860
None unless you live in England.  Only the BBC is live
1149964
Residents of the UK can watch any matches that the bbc are televising at www.bbc.co.uk\n\nOtherwise there are a host of great p2p tv streaming programs. Go to www.coolstreaming.it to find out more. Tvkoo & pplive are the best programs where you will be able to watch the games on cctv1 & cctv 5.\n\nYou could also go to www.viidoo.com and watch games on cctv5 or espn 2 but you will need to have Vlc media player which you can get at www.videolan.org.
327853
None that are legal. There are illegal ways, but it would not be worth it to me. $250,000 in fines with a possibility of 5 years in jail? Not a good trade for watching King Kong...
816963
Yes, unless you or YouTube have a license.
114941
No, not legally, unless you have a site license.
1121907
if your in the UK BBC.com
900902
There aren't really any laws on the internet.  Even if it is copyrighted content, the person streaming the media is the one at fault, not the person watching it.\n\nYou're fine.
887120
Sadly, the practice you describe is legal in England but was banned in Scotland some consioderable time ago.  The High Court decided it was extortion.  \n\nI agree that this is worth an insurance claim.  It may also be worth a call to the local paper...