Would it be morally wrong to drop about 10 nukes on Mexico?  That might put an end to our immigration problem!
929270
Diabolically, nuking Mexico will affect the US because of the radiation.  Likewise, it will drive more Mexicans to go north - USA.
682683
Bush should just ignore Fox. Mexico has tougher immigration laws than the US, but they call us Draconian if we want to reciprocate. Fox is a hypocrite. Like  someone else said, it is OUR SIDE OF THE BORDER, and OUR TROOPS. Emigration also frees Mexico from actually having to FIX THEIR PROBLEMS.
20185
Only if we're hit first, then there will be no choice. Getting nuked and not sending one back would send the wrong message to other nuclear armed countries.
943240
I admire your cander for asking such a question, you must be a glutton for punishment!!!! To achieve what you are purposing you would first have to deport all citizens who are from the middle east from the countries who are going to strike. Then after all this upheaval you would need to organise a massive multinational nuclear strike. This is a massive up taking and quite frankly there are far,far too many innocent non terrorists who will be annihilated! Stupid proposal!!!!!
750408
Yes, it is all those things.  And this is our government in collusion.  And most Americans are afraid of being uncaring if they say or think that we should secure the border so the terrorists stop walking across.   Think about it:  Most Americans cannot come to the point where they say we should secure our borders so that terrorists will stop walking in.  All they focus on is how mean it is to send poor people back to their country and how it is un-Christian to demand secure borders.  So, are we to understand that it is Christian-like to leave the border porous so terrorists can continue to flood in to put together dirty bombs to kill millions of Americans?  Is that what Christianity is all about?   You people - and you know who you are - cannot have it both ways even if you avoid the bad news.  It is still gonna happen and you people die as easily as the rest of us.  Stop being pathetic and think for yourself.\n\nNOTE TO ELPIBE:  READ THE QUESTION AGAIN.  MEXICO PROVIDES THE ENTRY POINT.  MEXICAN NATIONALS (TEENS AND YOUNG MEN) MAKE UP ALMOST ALL THE GANG HOMICIDES WHICH NUMBER IN THE HUNDREDS AND GROWING.
844849
No, invading Mexico would only create more problems. We already have enough.   Just seal up the border, and enforce ALL of our immigration laws and deport all illegals upon discovery .....do all that there won't be a need to invade Mexico.
469756
Some say we have no respect for life.  And we have nukes.  Everyone gets all worried when a new country gets nukes.  Sadly, the power a country obtains by having a nuke (USA!) makes it a desirable goal for countries.  We were just as afraid of pakistan and india having nukes, but now that they have nukes we 'work' with them.  We won't negotiate or lift sanctions with/on North Korea, but if they get nukes, we'd meet them as equals instead.  So you see, the United States created this 'everyone wants nukes' problem.  I'm sure the rest of the world isn't so sure we're completely trustworthy and capable of having them, just as we're afraid of other countries having them.  You'd think the solution would be to eliminate nukes.  Sadly, that's impossible because then some other country would get them and they'd be the super power like the USA.  And then we'd be on the short end of the stick internationally.  Basically, we'd be screwed.  It's a no-win situation.
1123039
Well I don't think it is right to drop nukes on anyone. However I also acknowledge that President Truman was facing at least 5 more years of war in the Pacific. Many more American and Japanese servicemen would have died. It is hard to say whether those death tolls would have topped Japanese casualties from the bombs. What always bothered me about Hiroshima and Nagasaki was that after seeing the power of the fist bomb the Emperor didn't surrender immediately, thus incurring a second attack. Understand this though, if it hadn't been for Japan those bombs might have been used some time later with much more staggering death tolls. So if nothing else it told us dropping nukes was something that shouldn't be taken lightly.\n\nOk EDINA we get it you don't like US Foriegn Policy. However you should really save that for the current Iraq debates, because whether you like it or not Japan attacked us, thus drawing us into WWII.  Oh and here's a clue for ya, they did it because they wanted grab up resources on all the pacific islands.
715136
I do think the Military should be used to protect ALL of our borders.  We have enough internal problems here already; so we should start protecting ourselves even more.  I fear terrorists coming in from the borders; so our Military should be there to make sure that doesn't happen.  And it would also stop people from entering this country ILLEGALLY.  \n\nTo answer your question about why you can't go to Mexico and just 'pick a spot there without any problems' is b/c they are VERY smart.  They DON'T allow people from other countries to just 'make themselves at home' without contributing to society.  So I say it's time for the United States to take that EXACT stand for our own country.  What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
744
That guy is a nut case, in my opinion, if he figues out how to make nucular weapons, we all better watch out. Course he is friends with our Gov of New Mexico! The Gov flys over there and tries to talk him out of deveploping the stuff. He's probably just trying to use the power to get stuff from the US! :)
543729
Hell no! Mexico is trying to take over the USA as it is. Look how many are SNEAKING across the borders now, if we were to give them duel citizen ship, that would be a night mare, then who is next? Canada? I say lets keep the USA as she is, the proud, the free and the home of the brave. Not the nation that has open door policy, (Hey everyone we don't care how many come over and take over our nation, just walk right thru the door and its yours for the taking)  come on, whats next? This is our America, our country, not theirs, they already have their own, why give ours up so easily?
770528
Yeah, I think that is extremely hypocritical. I mean, I would take it as a compliment if foreigners came here. I mean, if the Mexicans want to come, then let them. If Americans do not want foriegners coming then help make conditions better in their countries or stop visiting other peoples'.
293265
To the guy above me.\n\nThat isn't our fault. Mexico needs to fix itself not just send its people to USA illegaly. I do feel sorry for them but I also don't want something like 9-11 to happen again.
377159
true, you annex mexico and all the wetbacks become legal!  not bad...and they have all that oil...and those wonderful drinks with the worms....and the beaches....and the oil....and chili.....and oil.....send an e mail to dick cheney.  solve two problems with one idea!  plenty of oil, and no illegals!  smart!
999127
God bless you too. I agree with you 100%. The problem is, it isnt going to happen. Then we would be as bad as them. Wholesale killing cant be the answer. We have to do it right, but I'll tell you what, the thought of a few B-52's tossing some tactical nukes  does make me smile.
765198
we're not traitors. Are we at war with Mexico or Iraq? If its with Mexico, then my husband and I would just stay out of it, maybe take a trip to Canada.
767610
instead lets send all the scientologists to mexico on a goodwill mission to "improve" living conditions.  \n To the one who made the statement; \n "What if we give you a brain and take away your computer?"   That would not be a good trade because He would lose a computer and you would still not have anything of value to trade.  UG! Me say, no good one deal.( folds arms)\n\n  This is fun.