Refererendum or not??
914774
There have been referendums in Quebec (1980 and 1995) where people in Quebec voted for sovereignty. The Bloc will not be satisfied until they are their own nation. Harper went out on a limb on Wednesday announcing Quebec will be a nation within Canada. \n\nSeparation will never happen. Quebec relies too much on Canadian Federal money....
949884
I have more than one translation...and using the concordance is always a good idea.\n\nThanks for pointing that out. \n\n:o)
978413
Your question is not clear. Can you restate it so we could provide sensible answers??\n\nChow!!
987673
no it is not true\n\nis this a question?
649402
Hi!\nUmmmmm I think I've read something by John somewhere...\nYou should know what I mean if i'm thinking of the right person but if not then you are so annoying and confusing and I made myself look pretty stupid. Just give me the points, ok? I don't even know what those are for...\n-isn't my background awesome?!\n-i am definitely not sure about this answer!
999090
is this not ridicules?
989904
Is this a hypothetical, or a sarcastic question? :P
663002
Whats to think?\nHope is better!!!
1079974
no\n\nListen to it here:
145390
Yes.\n\nIt's used in the sentence that you posed as a question.
252085
Yes it is , Just ask a part of it in english  so it wont be reported the main point here is to share our answers so you´ll figure it out ....
1060438
Hey you took my suggestion! LoL... \nanyway... salad_85 is wrong already... "unintended mistake"... don't the teachings tell us God is infallible (meaning NO MISTAKES... intentional and unintentional included)? Also mentioned evolving... a thing Believers are supposedly to DENY?\n\nanyway- I think it is a dominate trait just a joke She likes to play on us humans. A sixth finger, one wouldn't know what to do with it... I know 2 full blooded Cherokee's who have had this... one got it removed, the other has kept his second thumb. (His 6th finger grew out of his thumb- weird looking). He can't really use it at all. But he will not remove it, because it was something he was born with.\n\nOnce again one of God's cruel jokes to play on human kind.\n\nLife is Cruel and Unfair... God is Cruel and Unfair.
837832
no\nthey are not the same
339268
What is the question? Can you pls reframe it?
1137603
does it really matter? \n\ni think the importance should be placed rather on how you feel about either: "faith" or "auto-suggestion"... and if either helps you in any way.
292411
Hmm, this might be a tough one.  Have you contacted UP for possible reference help?
408941
Regarding translation and the Word of God.  To say, in general, that I "question" something is not saying that I disagree with it.  I try and question much in translation.  There was a time when I questioned the Word of God.  I have since been convinced of the veracity of God's Word, but I still question translation and try to derive as much as possible from it by reading many different concordance references and multiple versions.  I would say, all in all, general bibles like the NIV and ASV are pretty good translations.  I would definitely get one with a good concordance, explanations, and references, and use them.\n\nOn fundamentalism and the Evangelical movement in America.\n\nThis is a loaded question.  There is 1. A fundamentalist faction.  2. an Evangelical movement and 3. the Moral Majority faction.  These are not one in the same, though members of each may cross over into the other and become affiliated with the other now and again.  NONE OF THESE ARE MILITANT.  Do they feel that America has diverged from a "wholesome" path... absolutely.  Do they feel that they want to be able to let their kids play outside again.... absolutely.  Do they think that God is the answer to the problems with America..... absolutely.  Do they think that their vote can make a difference... they know factually that it can.  But, few support Jerry Falwell for any public office... I believe his call is for evangelism... not politics, though he has a right to voice his opinion when someone asks him.  Is it good for the Republican party?  Well, I guess it would be... considering their "conservative" agenda.  Moreover, I think that is bad for the Democratic party than good for the Republican.  The Democratic Party is now appearing to stand against Christianity and Christians, in general.  Considering there is only one kind of Christian (whether fundamental or liberal) this is a bad progression of events for the Democratic party.  I think that they need to review their stance, or another party needs to creep up.