Is it true that Mushrikeen should be killed without any exception. They should only be allowed to live if they
929645
absolutely not. that was a time of war. there was a battle going on sir.\n\na battle that the Mushrikun started in the first place.\n\nplease read the verse all the way on top of the page. \n\nit says,\n\ncall to the way of your Lord with wisdom and sincere exhortaions and debate with them in manners that are most appropriate { An Nahl 16:125}
790684
It is a hard one because it has happened that they executed the wrong person....so what happens than ,you cant bring them back...no one has a right to take any life....we are to quick to kill kill kill.
786913
I too have studied the Islamic faith and I must say some of it is very good indeed honesty dont eat before your neighbour to takes ones life is to take the life of all mankindetc. But pissing in your clothes etc is very very funny. Killing the infidel unless he pays you well that is laughable A muslims lets you live because you give him money . Whoops you leave the islamic following and you can be killed and the Muslim that does it  cannot be punished.
553623
Agree 100% \n\nSome of you do not realize that these radical Muslims have a different aspect on life and death. THEY WANT TO DIE!! They die they win. Despite what Moussaoui said in court today. These people hope to be killed killing us.
230297
I am a Muslim and i TOTALLY disagree with attacks on civilians.Killing civilians is totally not allowed in Islam so those who do it are mislead and i even doubt it if they are Muslims at all.A teaching in our holy book goes like this TO KILL EVEN A SINGLE INNOCENT MAN IS EQUIVALENT TO KILLING THE WHOLE HUMANITY.So those with little knowledge about our religion should enlighten themselves before reaching to any conclusions.
960684
Not at all.  There was a recent case of this in Africa, with her sentence (being buried to the neck and stoned) being "reconsidered" because of the international reaction.  Other behaviors have been protested, too.  The South American custom of a man murdering his divorced wife if she starts to date again, and calling it a matter of "honor".  Indian women being burned in a "cooking accident" because the dowry didn't come through.  Why should Muslims be given a pass?  They just convicted a man in Georgia for cutting his daughter's clitoris off with a pair of scissors in order to be sure she remained "good".  He may protest his sentence, but she'll suffer longer than he will.  This isn't ethnocentricity.  It's an ability to empathize with a person who suffers.  Those without the ability to empathize aren't faithful to any religion; they're merely psychopaths.
775804
I think we should do what that general suggests.  There has never been a war, in which a force that went and lived up to laws of morality, and the other side did not, and the first force, winning.  Sometimes, you just have to be cruel to win.  I think what this general says is a great idea (I know it sounds kind of sick)  Just kill the people that decide to ruin other's lives, I see no wrong in that.
706981
Do they have choice?Kill or be killed...
602457
PROPHET MUHAMMAD PBUH PROHIBITED THE KILLING OF CHILDREN AND WOMEN\n\n"Narrated By 'Abdullah : During some of the Ghazawat of the Prophet Muhammad pbuh a woman was found killed. Allah's Apostle disapproved the killing of women and children".  Saheeh Bukhari (Volume 004, Book 052, Hadith Number 257)\n\nThose who are not generally engaged in fighting – like women, children, the elderly, the handicapped, and others who do not participate in the fighting – are not to be killed. The Prophet (peace be upon him) prohibited this. His prohibition of the killing of women and children is clearly related by Ibn `Umar in Sahîh al-Bukhârî (3015) and Sahîh Muslim (1744).\n\nBOOK OF Saheeh Muslim (Book 019, Hadith Number 4319)\nChapter : Prohibition of killing women and children in war. \n\nIt is narrated on the authority of 'Abdullah that a woman was found killed in one of the battles fought by the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him). He disapproved of the killing of women and children. \n\n ==========================================\n\n\nTO >>>>>>>>>>>>>>internationa...\n\nNEXT TIME DO READ THE QUESTION.\n\nit says "WOMAN AND CHILDREN"...AND I SUGGEST YOU TO READ WHAT I POSTED\n\nI HAVE RESPONSE FOR EACH AND EVERY VERSE YOU QUOTED. NEXT TIME QUOTE ONE VERSE AT A TIME, SO THAT YOU CAN BE GIVEN RESPONSE EASILY..... DONT JUST THROW BALLS HASTEN AND EXPECT OTHERS TO CATCH.\n\nMAY GOD GUIDE YOU.\n\n============================\n\nto >>>>>>>>>>...."moondrop000"\n\nWHAT ARE YOU WRITING??? DO YOU HAVE ANY SENSE>>> I wasnt expecting such abuse from your mouth to our beloved prophet Muhammad pbuh.... I WONDER WHEN OUR CHRISTIAN BRETHREN WILL LEARN HOW TO RESPECT OTHERS FAITH.... HAVENT YOU SEEN US (MUSLIMS) HOW WE RESPECT JESUS PBUH. \n\nAND YOUR INFORMATION IS WRONG... \n\nALL THE MALE CHILD OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD PBUH WAS DIED. AISHA WAS NOT THE WIFE OF THE CHILD OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD PBUH.\n\nAND HE MARRIED WITH HER BY HER WILL AND THE WILL OF HER FATHER. AND THERE ARE DIFFERENT REPORTS OF HER AGE. SOME SAY 9, SOME SAY 15, ETC.. JUST AS CHRISTIANS HAVE DIFFERENT REPORTS OF THE AGE OF MARY PBUH AT THE TIME OF BIRTH OF JESUS. IE. 14, 16, ETC.\n\nALLAH KNOWS BEST
249928
Calling the punishment severe is based on modern westernized ideals.  Hanging seems a lot more humane than burying someone up to thier neck (while they are alive) and then throwing stones at thier heads until they die, or worse.  The western world's veiw of harsh punishment has nothing on the ways that Arab countried have traditionally killed thier citizens. Hanging probably seems like they are being rewarded with a quick death, so I doubt that it would effect the actions of insurgents/ terrorists.  Westerners don't have the stomach to do things that would get the bad guy's attention.
597212
I got the joke... it's not all bad.\n\nBut I don't know if it is such a good idea to joke about this. It may seem strange to us today that there should be ANY limit on free speech. But this is THE BOTTOM to push if one wish to engage a Muslim in a death dual.\n\nThe law of their religion is full of sins punishable by death. Not unlike our religion BTW. The difference is that, they still feel obligated to carry out that punishment.
892904
1. Killing is prohibited of anyone except in the case of those who    wage war against you, and even then, if the attacker shows repentance it is obligatory to show them forgiveness. Surah 5: 34-35\n2. The End will be the Judgment of all mankind, each judged on his/her own doings. Surah 82 18-19\n3. The righteous shall be in bliss. The wicked will be in the fire. Surah 82 13-14\n4. The last question is just stupid. That is a myth. Paradise is being close Allah.
848781
Yes, anyone who kills themself should be executed.  Not only that, they should be made to pay to clean up the mess.
964240
Muhammad (pbuh) will strongly disapprove this LilPink  because he told us the teaching of Allah( GOD) n he has clearly told that never kill innocent ,ladies, old peoples or rest of the  peacful peoples and fight only to those who are fighting with u, He told us not to destroy even vegetation if u are fighting in enemy area.....and fight only to those who attack you. well killing in islam is basicaly for defensive purpose n God doen't like killing innocents.....killing is only allowed for war purpose  .like when u are attacked by some invader who want to destrou your sovereingnty u should fight with them .......for those redical muslims i must say they are Wrong totaly wrong and they are terrorist........they are not following true islam and these are the peoples who brought bad name to our religion but the worse thing is that rest of the world also judge islam on basis of those redicals....they are  not following islam..i must say they are equal to that terrorism that is being practised in Iraq and Afghanistan, \n  the sad aspect is that there are redicals in other religions as well but only islam is judged on  their activites while rest of the religions are spared.... anyways..simple answer to ur question is that Yes Muhammad will strongly condemn such activities.which are surely terrorism..\n\n peace!!
482405
Is not considered but it is. You own people which you treat bad and beat them or even if you want you could kill them. That is terrorism because you are attacking people that do nothing against you.
576140
these extremist are the mainstream muslims,ghastly murder is the duty of all muslims.all infidells will be killed or converted.all jews will be exterminated.only then can there be peace on earth...all men will bow towards meccia 5 times per day and chant a prayer that will brainwash this person in time...all women will be property,life liberty,and happieness are at the descresion of their husbands...or we could bring the fight for freedom to the extremist,nuke damaskis,beirut,theran...kill 50 million muslims,we will no longer hear of islamic world domination
690848
It is not that indians are been killed in Afganistan,it is that foreigners those are been killed in there.so the govt of india should not indulge in the developemnt of any other nation,while you have not been proficient in solving ur own problems of the country.I'm a true liberalists and i know the psychology of the most of islamic states, they do want development they want distruction b'coz their god says to do this.'Allah' is the only god in this world n the followers of Mohommaden only should florish, others whould die,n die strictrly.So they r killing.Don't help them.Help urself.It is easier to wake up the slept man,n equally difficult to wake up those unslept.