Why do you have recreational sex if you are pro-life?
920797
ONLY SINNERS HAVE RECREATIONAL SEX !!!\nTHAT TELLS YOU THE TYPE OF PERSONS THEY ARE !!!
1036494
I dont think its the best for a person physically but maybe if they kept their legs closed and didnt use abortion as a birth control they wouldnt have to worry about it. \n\nThink about adoption, many couples are looking to adopt babies while irresponsible "women" ( and I use that term lightly) are killing babies every day
733188
Aren't conservatives amazing?\n\nThey're against "Big Government" but want to have religious nutcases like Jerry Falwell or Ted Haggard make all your personal and medical decisions for you (no abortion, no stem-cell research, no pre-marital sex, no gay marriage, no gambling, no sex education, no Plan B or other contraceptives, etc.). I was gonna say "no drugs" but Haggard blew that one.
88585
How can we all be positive? I thought u wanted thoughtful replies, that would make u ponder the answers u recieved. Isn't that the point of this site? Oh well. Here's my reply. Yes, we are all God's creation, and sex by our parents is how God wanted us to enter the world. We are not a creation of sexual fulfillment, if we were, everytime they had unprotected sex, they'd get pregnant. Besides, not everyone who gets pregnant got sexually fulfilled during the act of conception. Does life have meaning? Yes,I think so, otherwise, we wouldn't be here. I believe everyone has a purpose decreed by God, and once u've satisfied the Lord's purpose on Earth, it's ur time to go on to Heaven.
619155
Of course it is great to have sex all the time!! i hate how religions make sex out to be a bad thing and a sin
875169
That's the main confusion most "pro life" people make. Being pro-choice does not mean that I am pro-abortion. It means I am for the rights of the people. Nobody is for abortion. Nobody wants it to happen. The facts are though, if you allow the government to strip you of your rights, no matter what they are, you will never get them back. And it makes it easier for them to take away more and more rights. I am pro-choice because the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution gives a woman the right to decide what she will and will not do with her body, and I am pro-constitution, and pro-peoples rights, and pro-choice. Besides, no matter how you feel, in the end it's none of your business what a woman does choose to do with her body. If if offends you, then don't do it. If you choose to teach this to your children, right on. But if you want to take away more of my rights, then you can stick it up your............
1005705
It justifies the fear of sex.\nOur main purpose on the planet, like all life, is to reproduce and die.\nBut...we can have a good time on the way.\nTake 'myjamsandwich' below. Now this is someone pretty screwed up with life.
225383
The higher purpose in permitting it is to affirm that every person should shall have full jurisdiction over what happens inside the boundaries of his/her body.  Therefore by permitting it we are acknowledging that the freedom of a person to control their own body is more important than other considerations.  However we are not endorsing the choices they make as "good".  We are merely choosing not to intervene forcefully in a person's excersise of thier soverign rights over their body.  In this light, persuasion and dialog become the tools of those who wish to stop the practice, not the threat of imprisonment or execution by the government (there are people out there who believe that it is murder and should be punished with death).  \n\nYour second question becomes irrelavent unless you believe that you or the government has a role in determining how a person should be permitted to exersise control over what goes on inside thier body.\n\nHuman sacrifice is ritualistic religious killing of a person in order to gain some favor with a God that they fear, in hopes that they will be granted some sort of boon from their god, such as good weather or reprieve from a plague.  I don't see how anyone would have an abortion to please God, but fervently religious people NEVER fail to surpirse me!
287005
Because it is an important aspect of life. Regarding your question, sex is meant to be the process of reproduction. An ongoing reproduction is one of the ways that a society will survive.
1061593
They don't have the required reproductive equipment. We are supposed to be fruitful and multiply. God created Adam and Eve. The rest of us are a result of them being fruitful and multiplying. That is part of God's plan for us. The purpose of sex is to reproduce. If you have sex with a same sex partner then it is not productive. It can also spread disease. God didn't make people gay. He gave them freewill and then they decided against his will to become gay.\nIf they want to have children maybe they should consider being heterosexual.
760382
A human fetus is a human baby. And the pro-choicers are killers who simply don't want any kind of responsibility. They want to horse around, have sex and get pregnant. Then they want to run and get an abortion, saying they want the right to do what they want with their bodies. But they made the choice to have unprotected sex. Perhaps they need lessons on taking responsibility for their actions.
1112340
it is a personal decision that people make based on religion, or if the father is circumsized, or for medical reasons. It has been found to reduce the risk of infections later in life such as STDs. There really is no benefit or difference with sexual relations (i know from experience)...
182086
Its Pleasure. WEll its not only 'WE' people hav sex but even animals has. And also coz god said "Go and multiply" \n\n(ARe u an indian? just curius..coz of ur name)
449218
Well lets just say Its better than going out and having  unprotected sex.   You cant make a baby by masturbating!
596779
Planned Parenthood can help you.  pcola_doodoo why don't you go smoke a pole whore?
257452
The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence.\n\nGiven today's STDs I think that someone who fools around with the unknown is fulfilling an undeclared death wish.\n\n\nWhy "Sex" Remains a \nDirty Word in America\n\nBy James Donahue\n\nNothing occupies our minds, our actions, our personal neurosis and our social lives more than sex.\n\nSexual intercourse between a consenting man and woman is probably the most desirable, most pleasurable and most spiritual part of the human experience. And there lies the rub. In the United States, it remains a forbidden topic in many social circles. When it is discussed among the boys in the locker rooms, the comedians on late night cable television, and the ladies during their afternoon luncheons, the stories become bawdy and perverted.\n\nOur failure to be open and frank about sex has created a nation of sexually frustrated and mentally twisted people. I doubt if there is another country in the world that can match ours per capita for the number of rapes, sex murders, child assaults and wife beatings that occur daily. Our cities teem with shops that sell sex in one lewd form or another. The rate of teen-age pregnancies is too high and the spread of venereal disease is at such an epidemic level that even the prudes who prefer not to talk about sex are starting to promote the use of condoms. It seems that the only type of sexual act that gets public discussion is homosexuality, and that is because a portion of society believes it is wrong and wants to put a stop to it.\n\nAttempts to change this social perversion and bring light on this subject also are under assault. The culprit is always the church, which treats sex as something reserved only for married couples and only necessary for procreation. That humans find great pleasure in sex seems to have a lot to do with the "sin" factor linked to it. For this reason, the Roman Catholic Church has consistently prohibited the use of any form of birth control. Church leaders, who claim to abstain and remain celibate, apparently regard it as sinful to find any pleasure in the sexual act. This twisted way of thinking has been largely responsible for world overpopulation and if is allowed to continue, may lead to the ultimate extinction of the human race.\n\n(One would think the problem could be solved if, instead of circumcisions, we could give our boys [and girls?] operations to completely remove all sensual pleasure from sex. And so much the better if we could add a little pain to the sex act so that the continuation of the species would be accomplished through personal determination rather than a lustful accident.)\n\nThe church has battled sex education classes in the public schools from the day the concept first began. The church attacked a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that Congress went too far in requiring cable television systems to fully scramble sexually-oriented television channels. We are constantly being fed propaganda about the evil Internet chat rooms where sex crazed madmen hit on young children with thoughts of evil deeds.\n\nThe argument is usually for the "protection of the children" from what is described as "hardcore depictions of sex" that can now get into any home with a television set or computer attached to the Internet. \n\nI have to wonder just what it is we are protecting our children from? Is sex, the natural reproduction process of the human race, such an ugly thing that we are ashamed to admit we practice it? Why shouldn't children be allowed to freely observe the open\nexpression of love between a man and woman so they have a healthy understanding of sexual differences and the magic process of producing children? Where and when did someone in our past decide that sex should be covered up and hidden in a dark and secluded place? \n\nAmericans are among the most sexually suppressed people in the world. Our insistence on hiding sex and making it some dirty th
814877
I am a conservative.\nI do NOT support sanctions and laws against gays marrying and women having abortions.\nThey are definently moral  AND political issues.\nThe reason it is a political issue is the fear of change and the fear that someones morals are not going to be the same.  If it was just a moral issue there would be no laws abridging the issues.\n\nWhat you are looking at is the Republican party platform.  There are real conservatives out here and we want real change.