why is yahoo biased there is nothing about kerry and his blunder What liberals I think I will change home site
930390
The Liberals probably support YA! lol
231639
Who do you propose reporting Yahoo too? The morality police? We all have first amendment rights under the constitution. I've seen a lot of posts that I don't agree with but people still have a right to post them no matter what their politics or sexual orientation.
948582
At least your account didn't get hacked down-- like mine.\n\nAs much as I would like to slam every lib here, I can't.\n\nIt's only a handful of especially bitter and threatened libs.\n\nNot all of 'em are soulless.\n\n\n\n\nGee, a thumbs down.\n\nIs it one of you "reporters"?
897820
people can't handle opinions, it is amazing that I actually get an answer to stay up anymore.  If it isn't yahoo, it is someone asking an opinion based question, and if they don't agree with me, i get abuse reported.  people need to cowboy up here!
881457
I totally agree with you.  I'd be off of here if I didn't want to try to make my 100 points for the day.  Yahoo needs to really take a look at Polls & Surveys today.  Of course Yahoo probably suspends them and they re-sign up under a different name.
944511
The site would be better with less censorship in the Political and Religion sections. There's an old saying "Never discuss religion or politics."  That is because they are explosive. Yahoo should just censor profanity, racism, and illegality. There would be a freer exchange of ideas. The censorship on Yahoo  now is much stricter than TV or radio. There is no need for that. Those who are offended can leave. Those who want a lively discourse can stay. I have actually learned a lot being on this site. But if it becomes watered-down and stale, it will be worthless. This site has made me angry, made me laugh, and has been good entertainment, and educational. I hope Yahoo does not increase its censorship even more.
279102
What's the address of the homepage?\n===================================\nADDED:\nNow I think about it I remember seeing the new Yahoo page as well.  Maybe it was just up for a while so as to get feedback or something.\n\nAs the the other reply says - have to wait for it to be rolled out.
944554
Unfortunately many of us have suffered under the dirty tactics of the right wing. I refuse however to be beaten. Yahoo just won't have the pleasure of my emails or a 360 profile in preparedness for the next suspension.
905423
As a liberal, it's embarrasing to have people posting questions like this.\n\nLet's try to raise the level of the discourse.  Let the fundamentalist conservatives have Shiraz and his ilk and their hateful questions.  Liberals should be better than this.\n\nI'm no fan of Bush, but the Nazi comparisons just don't hold water, and they make us look as silly as those we oppose.
936385
How come, a person who is crying because they are scared of what might happen, are calling liberals "wussies"?  \n\nI guess this is what happens when you continue to follow STUPID!\n\nBTW. . .WWJD?\n\nFarzand A:  It is a fact that "ALL MEDIA" is biased depending on ones particular view.  Which is why everyone and anyone should seek as many different sources possible to gain information.  \n\nI check many sources (using the Internet) to see through the eyes outside of this country, as it pretty obvious that every U.S. news station will tend to protect this nation (and it is understandable).  While our constitution states we have freedom of the press, the press is free to report the news as the owners see fit.  It does not guarantee that it has to be reported straight up and with no holds barred.\n\nToday the ignorant stay ignorant by choice, however, stupidity is a Birth Right and no amount of knowledge can help them. . .In this forum it is difficult to tell the two apart, and the whole concept that a 45 is the best solution,  proves my point.
960087
One of the childish individuals who come on here would have reported you for abuse, and since Yahoo don't even bother to verify if the report is valid they delete it and send you a warning and help themselves to some of your points. Yahoo really need to do some proper monitoring.
1153445
they wont answer you! they have there head stuck up there a*s with this new beta sh*t.and it has all of yahoo screwed UP.sorry but we all are in same boat.
408880
It is NOT just you. There is a serious DUH factor in MOST of the questions in here.\n\n\nReticent how can you blame Yahoo's STUPID questions on Bush. That raises the DUH factor of the answers.
923191
Gee that's funny, I throw bombs at liberals for fun, and my email is always open.  The day I become afraid of liberals, I pray someone in my family will run me down with their car.\n    Sadly, only one had emailed me, and as it turned out it was nothing but an intelligent respectful argument.  \n   So friend, allow me now to insult your factless whiny accusation.  You do not inevitably see it. That is somewhere on the scale of wishful thinking to downright lie.  So put the picture of Speaker Pelosi away, pull your pants up, and stop crying.  There are better ways to celebrate your election day afterglow isn't there?
395885
dreamer (above) that website is pure bull.  It is a typical liberal website that makes accusations and does not provide any evidence of backing it up.\n\nWhy don't you people start researching things for yourselves and stop believing people like Michael Moore without looking into them.  You will find these leftist liberal socialists are lying to you.\n\nPeople like Sean Hannity, and Rush give you sources which you can verify.  The website you posted has nothing but biased opinions with no facts behind them other than their hatred for Bush.\n--\n\nwyldfire (above) , do you think Bush 'fooled' all these people into believing Iraq had WMD?  Did Bush have a master plan, even before he was in office, to convince all the following liberals that Iraq had WMD?  And furthermore, why would all these liberals believe Bush.  They seem to disagree with anything he has to say.  Check out this link:\nhttp://www.davidstuff.com/political/wmdquotes.htm
956135
Damn good plan.  It is too hard for people to run non-partisan web sites now a days.  Maybe we should contact our Secretary of State and suggest this idea and see what they say.
845550
I know people around here like to claim its liberal censoring but it really isnt. Alot of people have had their accounts suspended and then were able to get them back. I have noticed the last 2 days or so, when I try to ask an obnoxious question(super obnoxious) it wont automatically post but I can still see in the my questions tab. So if after 5 minutes the question still hasnt posted on the page, I pull it myself, since it would appear to be against some of their guidelines, rather than waiting for it post and it getting removed and getting another violation notice and losing more points.\n \n   To get around it, if you dont care, you could post a fairly innocent subject line like Why does Bill Clinton? Leave it at that. Wait for it to post, then ad the remainder in the additional details section.\nEDIT:Augh, now I want to know what the question is. If you hadnt said it was like artwork I could have just gone about my day, but now now, it will bother me all day...(not really)