can we price the fixed assets according to its fair value if we cann't ;why?
913947
Normally we don't. But when the fair value of the asset is much lower than the original cost, it can be considered to re-value it.\nOther situations depending on what industry you are in.
632342
If the options are in-the-money, you should certainly exercise them.  \n\nThe options you have are either qualified or non-qualified options.  If they are nonqualified, then the fact that you are subject to the AMT doesn't matter.  You have to pay ordinary income taxes on the difference between the fair market value and the strike price.  Let's look at an example.  Suppose you can buy the stock at $10 per share and it is trading at $22 per share.  $10 is the strike price and $22 is the fair market value.  You have to pay ordinary income taxes on (22-10) = $12 per share.  $22.00 now becomes your tax basis.  Let's say you hold onto the shares for two years and sell at $40.  You have to pay long-term capital gains taxes on the gain -- and the gain is $40 minus your tax basis of $22 -- so you pay capital gains taxes on a $18 gain per share.\n\nNow let's suppose that they are qualified options (part of an employee option plan open to everyone).  If you weren'r subject to the AMT, then you have no taxable event until you sell the stock.  When you do, you are subject to capital gains tax on the difference between what you sell it at and what you bought it at.\n\nHowever, you are subject to AMT taxes.  This means that when you exercise the options, you have to pay taxes at the AMT rate on the difference between the fair market value and the strike price.  This is just like the non-qualified case -- except that you pay at the 20% AMT rate rather than the higher ordinary tax rate (which could be as high as 39.6%).  The fair market value (price at exercise) becomes your tax bases.  When you eventually sell the stock, any capital gains is taxed at the long or short term capital gains rate where the gain is the difference between the selling price and your tax basis.\n\nHolding onto the stock has risks.  It is possible for the stock to fall below the value of the owed taxes.  This happened to a lot of people during the 2001 burting of the internet bubble.
831257
I am not sure, but I can not imagine that is a law anywhere.\n\nMaybe you have misread, or misheard the rule.  Just a guess, but perhaps it is stated something like, "can not charge over 6 percentages higher than the current rates."
65652
There are two kind of prices...\n\n1) price to sell\n\n2) price to not sell\n\nIf you're hurry just consider the first option...
1042934
false.\n\nthe different between assets and liabilities are your NET assets
638615
There are the initial fees for posting, plus a percentage of the final cost when you sell. That is based on the value of the item when you post it and what it finally goes for.
187458
Currency values between countries aren't controlled by any specific agency or anything, they're resultant of the economic factors in the various countries. A country can't just one day say 'hey, our currency's worth 10 times more than it was yesterday!' - it's a measure of how much money will by in the given countries versus production costs, etc. etc. - it isn't a controlled value.
250738
In Accounting... web-sites should be considered as a fixed asset as it is unmovable except content which should not count as part of it... but for the taxation purpose.. it is an expense
648984
There are a lot of variables, but unless they violated the terms of the trust they cannot be held liable.  Also, making reasonable investments (which turn out to fail) doesn't rise to violating investment terms.
290517
Yes, there is a chart under the sale items tab that explains the fee for LISTING an item and the FINAL SALE PRICE fee.  you can set the price up so that those amounts are yours or the buyers.
761795
No.  I know this is a hard idea to grasp, but once you buy property you have the right to use it, lease it, or sell it to anyone you want.  You do not have the right to buy the property unless you have a contract that states you do or a 'right of first refusal' contract that says you have the right to buy at a price equal to an offer in the future.
1042795
fixed price contracts.
587400
Nope.  \n\nThey are willing to sell it to you at that price.  As such, you have no grounds to sue.  They are passing through the cost of the use of an ATM card at about what it costs.  \n\nIf you want the lower price, pay cash.
630874
If the contract only had a total with one price, then the seller would be obligated to honor the price.  Since the contract has individual prices that are added up to the total, then the contract would be considered void in a court of law as it has a calculation error, unless the total says that it has been discounted to be lower than the sum of the individual components.
1014280
money and value are relative terms.\neg if we have only 100 $ in the whole world then value will be fixed accordingly.\nnow u keep increasing this amount and value will be adjusting accordingly.\nin theory i must say that we have sufficient money vis-a vis\nthe value.
731551
Yes.  Market value per share is synonymous with the latest price per share.  The exception to the rule is if official share trading has been halted, whereupon unofficial (over-the-counter) trading is then the market value.
785717
NO! He/she are being paid their full (fair market) asking price, less your share/payment, from the gov. and they can get in serious trouble by asking you to pay more.