do you think the writer of this article has his numbers all wrong?
920461
Actually those numbers are a little conservative compared to some of the numbers I've seen... but the quote that says it all is this one.\n\n"I imagine that hardheaded advocates of the war will say that such is the price of liberty, that eggs must be broken. Yet here's the rub: The Iraqi people did not decide that such a cost was worth bearing. They had it imposed upon them"\n\nWe decided FOR them if it was liberty or death.....
471834
aren't u missing a number there on the last row???\n\nin that case... i would say...\n\n9 11 13 15 17 19....
479644
I believe he submitted a false scorecard.
464090
marabierto1961 is partially right and wrong the 12 million illegals are to blame but I've heard that some people in the mexican government give people manuals on the best ways of sneaking across the boarder, how much food and water to bring, landmarks and stuff like that!  As of the other stuff he said he must be suffering from a cranial rectal insertion complex, cause he is completely wrong!
247444
I don't trust his ratings. I would use common sense and market research. He is slowly turning into some kind of a showman rather than an investor and there is no data backing the millions of profit he claims to have made. Trust your own judgement, these TV stars will not stand by you.
526756
Yes he'll average more than 35 PPG. I don't see anything wrong with him changing his number. He clearly stated that he changed his number to signify a new beginning to his career in an interview...more passing, perhaps?
323318
I think he is in deep, deep trouble over this one.  His answers on the News tonight left a lot to be desired......\n\n(I bet the Americans have not got a clue what we are on about.  Also, very nice to see correct spelling and grammar).
956991
It just goes to prove what absolute rubbish you can actually PAY to read!\n\nIt is true that an increasingly worrying proportion of Americans are overweight but the article was being exceptionally facetious!
296718
Its is confidencal. You can get an apprximation but not exact figures. I guess about 50,000 or more.
375323
its strange i know but i was read it at digg and the guy did it 150+  i couldnt find it at my bookmarks but this one can give you idea http://www.flexbeta.net/main/comments.php?id=5535&catid=1
1155100
looks like a lot of people are bothered by this number.  Check out the link below
652851
Almost certainly not. It doesn't have the correct form, and has the wrong number of digits.
415305
Yes. In fact, it's wrong on 42 Levels!  :)
160387
i don't agree that it's a good thing, but i can't deny the numbers.  TO ANSWERERS: if you click on the link you will see.  TO OMARSAIFSUNNY: if you write out the question THEN put in the link people will know what you are asking.
606844
I think it's bogus and shouldn't be counted...\n\n714*
1023578
LOL\n\nWHY?\n\nANYWAYS,HE HAS 6 IN 1 HAND,5 IN THE OTHER,,,,,,,11 IN TOTAL\nWHERE DID U HEAR THIS CRAP FROM?
564262
The hit guy was looking for Pythagoras but got the address wrong.\nSheesh! We lose more good mathematicians like that.