Why were their no Knaked women in the intro to the new James Bond film?
917457
In today's overeating and underexercising society, the film makers were unable to find willing women who were not obese. After many discussions and much debate they came to the conclusion that the use of these women in the introduction may cause many of the audience to leave before seeing the movie, or at least ask for sick bag, thus saving many from hours of boredom and detrimentally affecting ticket sales.
758408
I saw the movie and I believe that she was trying to protect her kidnapped boyfriend and Bond at the same time. What I mean by that is the fact that all she ever did was to try and get that money in order to pay Ransom for her kidnapped boyfriend (I'm still not sure why was he kidnapped). Once she did, Bond was after her, she was afraid that they would kill her boyfriend if she ever told anything, that is why she died. At the end you see Bond shooting some guy in the leg (remember that in the beginning of the movie that guy also appeared in the opening scene) , he deliberately didn't kill him since he wanted to get the information out of him- where is the girl's boyfriend and what on Earth is he going to do with 150 million dollars (I think it was that much). So basically the movie has an open ending so that the next James Bond movie, Bond would be chasing the bad guys that are responsible for the kidnapping. I hope this helped.
461543
You know of course that James Bond is not a real person.If a person like James Bond killed people in the service of his country or some other line of duty, that is not considered murder.  I guess the same could be said for sleeping with the women, but I am not sure of that because I am sure he takes great pleasure from it.
759455
The new bond movie doesn't come out until the 19th, but I think it's going to be a great movie. I definitely think they could have chosen a better Bond than Daniel Craig, and I think he will make the movie feel less like a Bond film, but it's still going to be great.
768450
The thing is that it is nothing like the Bond films that we have had for the last few years.\nThis is a good gritty film and because of the back to basics type story it is worth talking about.
7793
because they dont have girls to fuck.
941709
I didnt notice anything, or maybe i wasnt listening....but now i will watch the two when they are together........They are my make and female picks!\n\n\n=)
924266
I don't think it's a matter of her not wanting to play those particular kinds of roles, she probably just has not had another opportunity to make a movie of that kind.  That was a very unique role and not every role an actor chooses demands that kind of sensuality.  Plus, it isn't like that is an easy role to play.  It probably took a lot of time and character study.
1168704
Hmm well maybe because every pron magazine that comes out of America has atleast million pics of blondes showing whatever they have to show..every XXX movies have them, most of the hollywood movies have atleast one blonde.... SO maybe guys get the idea that the women who will are going to let them do it are the blondes...\nAs for me i dont know what they have ,to be proud of or to make them better looking than others.....
854738
the best Bond - Sean Connery\nThe latest one is to introduce a new type of Bond. No handsome, no sophisticated gadgets
833058
Yes, I'm pretty sure you are the only one on the face of this great green earth who doesn't like the new James Bond!  You may be  forgetting the premise of the movie:  This is the beginning of James Bond as 007 -- he's supposed to be different than all the other James Bonds to follow -- he is a work in progress (aren't we all?)
180738
No.  If I go to a James Bond movie there are things I want to see and hear.  Gadgets, meglomaniacs,Guns, women (not naked), and cars with a standard transmition.  Not some sissy running around naked.  These things separate Bond movies from other action films.  Bond fans will go out just because it's a Bond film (well with this new sissy maybe not especially if he's running around naked and can't drive a real car)\n\nBond films are supposed to be over the top with music and the set and gadgets.  If I wanted to watch a rap video I would watch a rap video.
230187
Was the other one, Pierce Brosnan, able to drive a stick shift? Anyways, I can't believe they picked Daniel Craig. And they are probably going to get rid of the corny one-liners and jokes that make the movies a Bond movie. They plan on doing a serious Casino Royale> That's the worst idea in the world!
1131646
Not a James Bond fan but yes there was.\n\nhttp://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061452
1000145
The FIRST actor to play James Bond was BARRY NELSON in a 1950s TV adaptation of Casino Royale.  This episode is included on the DVD of the 1960s film version of the same name.  (The movie is a mess, but the Burt Bacharach score is awesome.)
411039
Rachel McAdams is probably the most sexy girl I have seen on film. She has shown next to no flesh too, which would make some wonder why I like her. I guess that is why, she leaves something to the imagination.
391683
First of all I like that you have used the name of a Harry Potter series character in your nickname. Second I do not equate good smelling men to being gay (I am a straight guy). If someone smells good it is easier to hold a conversation with them and if the fragrance they aare wearing is good I tend to remember them for a long time, if someone is bad smelling I try to run away ASAP. James Bond is not gay (at least no such encounter has been shown yet, they might change that anytime they want to make the film more "open" for people of all orientations) and I don't think anyone would imagine James Bond to smell bad, you can almost smell him wearing some great smelling perfume, so if you have a good perfume sense you can pass for royalty. If you are bad smelling you are not allowed in the house. I would rather be termed a good smeling gay man rather than being termed a straight trashcan.