Define Continuance of Disability Investigation and it's purpose?
922688
See whether you are still disabled from any accident or whatever. If you claim that you were hurt in an accident and have to be out of work or have medical treatment, often the insurance companies will check up on you to see whether you are still suffering from your injuries. Some people try to scam insurance companies, workers' comp, etc. out of money by claiming they are still injured, but are working side jobs or can easily move about. Doctors might sometimes do it to keep billing insurance companies even though the person is physically fit.
459981
Yes - you may now qualify for a partial disability payment that can continue until you are released to full duty.
760630
It is a pre-sentence investigation report. The following website provides more info.
433890
person filing the case name is with held for safety reasons.
1171683
First of all the Justice Court does not give felony charges anymore, they are all misdemeanors.  Felonies get a "supervening indictment" to Superior Court if they start in Justice jurisdiction. \n\nEven if there was no "complaint filed" the prosecutor may ask for a grand jury indictment or file again.  If the charges were just "scratched" or "vacated " they still may be brought up again (and again, and again, and again).  \n\nThe only time the charges will "disappear forever" is if it dismissed WITH PREJUDICE.  Don't ask me why they call it that, but it's the only time I think of the phrase "with prejudice" as being something worthwhile.
803526
I'm in the UK but the basic principles are much the same. \n\nDouble Jeopardy means that you cannot be tried for exactly the same crime twice - particularly murder. For crimes such as this, a person must be found guilty "beyond reasonable doubt" (this is known as the "burden of proof").\n\nFor wrongful death, the burden of proof is lower because a wrongful death suit is a civil action (rather than a criminal prosecution). For civil actions the burden of proof merely requires that they be found guilty "on the balance of probabilities" - in other words an element of reasonable doubt is permitted.\n\nWrongful death actions often occur after a criminal murder trial has failed through lack of sufficient evidence to prove guilt even though there is a strong suspicion that the accused person is responsible for the death.\n\nIncidentally, here in the UK there has recently been the first conviction under Double Jeopardy. The law was recently changed allowing a person to be tried a second time after having been found not guilty at their first trial. A second trial is now permitted if significant new evidence is brought forward which brings into question the verdict at the first trial. This is basically in response to advances in DNA and forensic science.
493838
Persistence and accurate reporting.
615680
um....it certifies that you completed or attended something, maybe a class for continuing education credits.
607988
To see if they are still qualified.
33189
Do you mean "disability" and social "security"?\n\nFor adults (over age 18):\n"How does Social Security decide if I am disabled?\n\nBy law, Social Security has a very strict definition of disability. To be found disabled:\n\n* You must be unable to do any substantial work because of your medical condition(s); and\n\n* Your medical condition(s) must have lasted, or be expected to last, at least 1 year, or be expected to result in your death.\n\nFor children (under 18 years of age):\n\n Social Security has a strict definition of disability for children.\n\n    * The child must have a physical or mental condition(s) that very seriously limits his or her activities; and\n    * The condition(s) must have lasted, or be expected to last, at least 1 year or result in death.\n\nMore information can be found at the links below.
1166249
The prosecution or side that is bringing the legal action - normally referred to as the Plaintiff - then the Defense closes - then the Prosecution gets to rebut and end.  Just so you know, the reason that the Prosecution or Plaintiff gets to go again is because the burden of proof is always on them so they are allowed to rebut your closing.
282985
It's in the 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution:\n\n"...nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb..."\n\nIf a person is found guilty of a crime, but later evidence shows up to prove he is innocent, he can request a new trial. In so doing, he would basically be waiving this portion of his 5th Amendment right. \n\nIf a person is found innocent, but later evidence shows up to prove he is guilty, the governmetn cannot violate his 5th Amendment right and re-try him for the same crime. But there is a loop-hole. He could be charged for a different crime. The 4 cops tried for beating Rodney King were found innocent, but then later re-tried for violating his civil rights. Same crime, different charges.
485962
There is no telling.  The referral has to be reviewed and a determination made whether or not to pursue the matter.  If it is pursued, the case is assigned to a manager, who in turn assigns it to an agent.  The agent then does a behind-the-scenes investigation regarding the person.  Finally, the person will be contacted (unless a decision was made somewhere along the line not to pursue the matter.).  Each of these steps can be delayed by workload, lack of personnel, etc.  There is no statute of limitations on an unfiled tax return, so there is generally no rush in these cases.\n\n**Regarding follow-up**\nSure it will eventually catch up with them.  The IRS can do up to six years' of tax returns within one audit when a nonfiler is involved, so by the time that the audit begins the person/business may be audited for five or six years at once.
145433
Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, which took effect July 26, 1992, prohibits private employers, state and local governments, employment agencies and labor unions from discriminating against qualified individuals with disabilities in job application procedures, hiring, firing, advancement, compensation, job training, and other terms, conditions and privileges of employment. An individual with a disability is a person who:\n\nHas a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities;\nHas a record of such an impairment; or\nIs regarded as having such an impairment.\nA qualified employee or applicant with a disability is an individual who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the job in question. Reasonable accommodation may include, but is not limited to:\n\nMaking existing facilities used by employees readily accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities.\nJob restructuring, modifying work schedules, reassignment to a vacant position;\nAcquiring or modifying equipment or devices, adjusting modifying examinations, training materials, or policies, and providing qualified readers or interpreters.\nAn employer is required to make an accommodation to the known disability of a qualified applicant or employee if it would not impose an "undue hardship" on the operation of the employer's business. Undue hardship is defined as an action requiring significant difficulty or expense when considered in light of factors such as an employer's size, financial resources and the nature and structure of its operation.\n\nAn employer is not required to lower quality or production standards to make an accommodation, nor is an employer obligated to provide personal use items such as glasses or hearing aids.
818621
I am not sure what you are actually asking.  Are you asking to find the definition to work out whose patient it is?  Whenever we have a patient who "overlaps" different facilities,  responsibilty for the administration is shared but treatment responsibility lies with where the client is actually located.\n\nI think that this should help\nhttp://www.direct.gov.uk/DisabledPeople/HealthAndSupport/YourRightsInHealth/HealthRightsArticles/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4014771&chk=jVhUS1\n\nor this\nhttp://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidanceArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4133839&chk=RJV7mg
1074393
File what?\n\nYou can file (make a motion) for a continuance, but if the opponent objects and the court agrees, the hearing will go forward.\n\nYou indicate you have an attorney. Is there some reason he hasn't answered this question?
164319
Definitions of terms of reference on the Web:\n\nUnder the authority of the CDCJ and in the framework of the follow up to the Declaration and the Action Plan of the Second Summit of the Council of Europe (Strasbourg, 10-11 October 1997), and of the Declaration of the Committee of Ministers on a European policy for new information technologies (Budapest, 6-7 May 1999), the CJ-PD is instructed:\nwww.coe.int/T/E/Legal_affairs/Legal_co-operation/Data_protection/Background/3Terms%20of%20Reference%20CJ-PD.asp\n\nTechnical Version: a document specifying the scope and details of the activity to which it refers and any conditions relating to the appointment of a person(s) to undertake the activity (usually used in relation to the supply of professional services).\nwww.ccd.net/resources/guide/glosary/glossary4.html\n\nDefinition of the work and the schedule that must be carried out by the evaluation team. It recalls the background and specifies the scope of the evaluation, states the main motives for an evaluation and the questions asked. It sums up available knowledge and outlines an evaluation method and describes the distribution of work, schedule and the responsibilities among the people participating in an evaluation process. ...\nstone.undp.org/undpweb/eo/evalnet/docstore3/yellowbook/glossary/glossary_t_u_v_w.htm