What is the reason terrorists kill people?
928766
As Mahatma Gandhi quoted correctly:\n\n"As soon as we lose the moral basis, we cease to be religious. There is no such thing as religion over-riding morality. Man, for instance, cannot be untruthful, cruel or incontinent and claim to have God on his side." \n\n"Gandhi guarded against attracting to his satyagraha movement those who feared to take up arms or felt themselves incapable of resistance. 'I do believe,' he wrote, 'that where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence.'"[18] \n"At every meeting I repeated the warning that unless they felt that in non-violence they had come into possession of a force infinitely superior to the one they had and in the use of which they were adept, they should have nothing to do with non-violence and resume the arms they possessed before. It must never be said of the Khudai Khidmatgars that once so brave, they had become or been made cowards under Badshah Khan's influence. Their bravery consisted not in being good marksmen but in defying death and being ever ready to bare their breasts to the bullets."\n\n"The sayings of Muhammad are a treasure of wisdom, not only for Muslims but for all of mankind." \n\n----------------------------------------------------------------------------\nSOME FACTS:\n\nJIHAD\nJihad is purely Strive for any Good:\nHadith 8.3: A man said to the Prophet, "Shall I participate in Jihad?" The Prophet said, "Are your parents living?" The man said, "Yes." the Prophet said, "Do Jihad for their benefit."\n\nJihad against Oppression\n2:190Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors. \n2:191And slay them wherever ye catch them and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter; but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque unless they (first) fight you there; but if they fight you slay them.  Such is the reward of those who suppress faith. 205 206\n2:192But if they cease Allah is Oft-Forgiving Most Merciful.\n2:193And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression and there prevail justice and faith in Allah; but if they cease let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression. \n\nJihad a duty against Oppression\n4:75And why should ye not fight in the cause of Allah and of those who being weak are ill-treated (and oppressed)?  Men women and children whose cry is: "Our Lord! rescue us from this town whose people are oppressors; and raise for us from Thee one who will protect; and raise for us from Thee one who will help!"\n\nWho you should not fight?\n60:8Allah forbids you not with regard to those who fight you not for (your) Faith nor drive you out of your homes from dealing kindly and justly with them: for Allah loveth those who are just. \n\nWho you should fight?\n60:9Allah only forbids you with regard to those who fight you for (your) Faith and drive you out of your homes and support (others) in driving you out from turning to them (for friendship and protection). It is such as turn to them (in these circumstances) that do wrong.
500487
Those are sufficient reasons in themselves. Apart from the fact that he and his cronies have an agenda to kill Americans (9/11) as well as anyone that might not agree with what they are doing in Palestine. Remember Palestine? Where they are killing Arab children because of ideaology.
1153880
You kill a man who has wronged you, the police try to catch you. You run, they shoot, then how can you justify yourself becoming a terrorist?  Why you kill somebody in da first place, huh, bubba?  Violence only complicates things more and more, it does not solve anything. Someone has to keep things in check for society and civilization to survive and prosper.\n\nI hope you get the idea, bub!\nst
244670
I think terrorism is the result of violence, and for most people violence can only be answered with more violence: terrorist acts. For example if you drop bombs in a country, and invade a foreign country, you can only expect more violence in return, so the only way to stop violence is not to use it as a way of changing the world.
674975
murdering helpless civilians is terrorism, and we do it too by bombing villages the explosion doesnt ask for names whenit goes off ,,soo we are part of the problem ,also any government that kills to make a policy stick like the saddam regeme one of our best customers by the way,, America makes and builds and sells more weapons than any country in the world ,,so we evn indirectly help to spawn revolutions ,,and arm drug gangs ,,around the world,, and terrorists
77968
Terrorists are a very hard to define group of people. It depends on the nation or person lobbying the accusation to define who is or is not a terrorists. Take for example, Israelis and the US have often blamed the Hamaz of Palestine as terrorists for targetting civilians but their own country men calls them freedom fighters for their effort in liberating their country. The same can be applied that the rebels in America during the war of independece were terrorists in that they target British loyal subjects. But to answer your questions not all terrorists are Muslims and not all Muslims are terrorists. Terrorists can be applied to any national as the US found out during the Oklahoma bombing or when the IRA in Ireland decided to take arms against the British. We could say that the Germans in WW2 were terrorists for conducting civilian bombing in London and even the US Air force for their bombing and destruction during the Vietnam war not for getting the Mai Lai massacre of unarmed civilians. Generally we label terrorists are those inclined to use violence to solve problems or to make demands for their cause and lead to the use of terror and the threat of violence to further their aims. It is hard to define whether their cause is a just one or another fanatical response to get what the wish for. The label of Muslims as terrorists is an inaccurate picture and generalizes and racial profiling due to fear of the unknown after the Sept 11 bombing as well as escalation of war in the Middle East.
1068687
They killed 7(as far as i know).Why?Cos for them it makes no importance if they are civilians or militants as long as they are Palestinians.
583116
there are various neurotoxins (also called nerve gases or nerve agents) that will kill with very low concentrations in seconds.  Fortunately, they are virtually inaccessible to the general population, and are restricted to military application.  Also fortunately, they have never been used by terrorists (to my knowledge) - likely because they are very difficult to handle
811224
In order to answer this we need to know why they are really there in the first place.  \n\nIf it is to stop terrorism than it cannot be won.  As long as therre are people there will be terrorists.  Killing people just breeds more hate and leads to a new generation of terrorist.  It is a war without winners.  Of course some would argue a war cannot be won or lost, justexists.
1161316
One mans hero is another mans terrorist except when you behead civilians who have their hands tied.\n\nThe man was a murderer the world is better without him.
558901
Terrorists are different from revolutionaries and freedom fighters. The latter two might accidentally kill innocents by negligence, bad luck or lack of thought. Terrorists by deffinition target innocents in the hope of creating enough fear to win their objective. Terrorism by nature is an admission of the inability to win militarily as such they attempt to scare/intimidate an enemy. This almost always fails so terrorists are also people with a complete lack of knowledge in history. Terrorism in the past has almost always hardened resolve and hurt a people's cause. \n\nSo no, most people could not actually intionally harm children in particuler. How many of you could sit on a bus with a bomb strapped to you and look at the child accross from you knowing you were about to kill them? I don't think many of us could do that. \n\nTo be a terrorist you have to leave your humanity behind. You have to decide that the qualifications for being a human are your narrow specifications. That those not like you are not human. Again most educated people cannot draw this line. Killing soldiers and enemy leaders yes. Killing those of your own group who betray your cause yes. Intentionally killing children and innocents no. \n\nThis is also why I feel that the accusations of the West being terrorists are groundless. When a missle hits a hospital by accident, often because the enemy placed military targets right next to a hospital, it was not something they wanted to do and we feel bad about doing this. The Arab nations know this and intentionally place targets near schools, hospitals and other areas willingly sacraficing women, elderly and children to generate negitive PR against their enemy. There is something inately psychotic about doing that in my opinion. \n\nMe I could easily blow up enemy bases, help sink enemy ships, assasionate an enemy leader and such if I felt I had really good cause to do so. I could not knowingly execute children. It's just not in me.
474042
Those who are killing others are totally unaware of any logical/rational reasons why they are killing others. \n\nThose who are dying, are void of reasons, i.e., why they were killed.\n\nWe are going in the "end-of-times" phase. We are yet to experience the mother-of-all battles.\n\nTyrants (rulers of all the muslim countries), bloody idiots (bush, blair, and their followers), have made this planet a living hell. This is streaming down in the civil societies now, there are gangs and gang wars in almost all the metropolitan cities and people are taking lives of others for just nothing.\n\nWe need to find the voice of silents, we need to raise up if we agrees that this will eventually vaporize the world. We need to form a balance in the shape of justice and complete justice, not linked to any veto power or on the interests of any particular group, country and countries.\n\nJust be human and let others to be human too.
812466
its for killing some one >......................
1167145
Terrorists are killing innocent Iraqis.  They want to have an Islamic empire where they rule.  Some intelligent Iraqis know the USA want to help them have a government with freedom and justice for the people.  That means religious freedom also.  In Islam there is no freedom for other faiths.  Other faiths get seriously persecuted.  \n\nThe USA is not killing the innocent.  If USA military does,  has to go to US court, decision is made if guilty or not guilty.  Just like if any one else murders someone.\n\nWe will win the war on terrorism.  The terrorists are the killers of innocent to terrorize the public to manipulate to control.  To a terrorists, it is okay to kill if it's for the cause of Islam.  Some Muslim people aren't Muslim enough or they're friend of US or they're children of an enemy of Islam.  If you don't convert or conform to Islam, then you're an enemy of Islam.  The only innocent Muslim is one who is one by the letter.  Basically, not one is that Muslim perfect.  Also,You have to deny Jesus the Son of God and deny that He died on the cross for your sins if you want to convert to Islam.
731646
I will admit it- I don't find the motives of terrorists to make any sense whatsoever.  It just makes no sense to me why people would want to annihilate others for living as they were meant to live.  And I will agree with you about the lack of real logic found in terrorists.  After all, they've been brainwashed from an early age in those "madrassas", and hence don't reason as other people do.  They continue to do as they've been told, without question, as they have done for many years.  Without any ability to think for themselves.
1131337
They could not give you an answer, they just want to kill.\nThey kill their own people....where is the logic?
535077
No, I mean "hell no."  We do so much to try and avoid civilian injury and casulty, we do more to try and defend their rights, and are working to leave the country.  Terrorist are working to inflict fear, create hatred, and in the name of an extreme version of a peaceful religion.