weapon maint officer????????
930094
Well as the name itself suggests they look after the maintenance of artillery weapons arsenal etc i think so
680704
His recruiter should have something like that.  If not, any duty station he is at will have things like that for sale at the PX, have him pick you up one.
811403
I've included the links to manuals for both weapons. Good luck!
669407
yeah right...i suppose green pigs swim upside down in you're world too eh? my apologies...a friend told me today that a dummy round can be inserted into the breach which has a laser pointer mounted in it to allow fine scope adjustment...i eat my words...
1093046
Jumping the Gun a bit !!!!
555576
Lol. well congrats on getting it. m fiance is in response and he loves it, well all except the paperwork.\nErm I'm split on the whole gun thing. I don't like the thought on the police relying on guns but then arguably they are more likely to be put in dangerous situations then the average Joe. And at the day they have other methods at their disposal such as CS gas, handcuffs and an asp (that name always makes me laugh).\nIt's just a case of not putting yourself in unessesary danger. Good luck.
481481
Try this: http://www.officerecruit.com/
352491
Do you like chipping paint or handling weapons that is the difference. BM though get to handle the ships that they are on, but GM deal with the weapons
35322
It's a color guard who compete with rifles, flags, batons, etc.  My best friend was in a competition guard!  They still have reunions and march in parades during the summer.\n\nI just found ya the link below...fun!
976068
I guess I am qualified to answer this.  I was a police officer in London for 30 years and am somewhat unique in that I was both shot and stabbed.  I was trained to use a firearm for over 20 years.\n\nThere are several different issues here, one of which is that we select police officers based on certain criteria, none of which is their ability to use a firearm.  It therefore goes without saying that many serving officers, if not most, will not have the skills (either practical or emotional) to be armed.  We do NOT recruit people into our police forces in order for them to kill our fellow countrymen.\n\n(As far as one of the other contributors to this answer is concerned, just about the only "accidental" shooting was of Charles de Menezes, and we all know WHY he was shot.  I think everyone in the police understands that that was a terrible mistake, but the mistake was not made by the firearms officer, who acted (a) in good faith and (b) in the belief that he was protecting the lives of many other Londoners when he fired his shots.  There are several other controversial ones, but unfortunately all you ever read are headlines without knowing the full substance behind the stories.\n\nHowever, the most pressing argument against officers being routinely armed is this:  at present officers attend many incidents where physical contact is involved; pub fights, domestic arguments, theft, assault; whatever you can possibly think of where, ultimately, the police officer and the alleged criminal come into physical contact.\n\nAt present, in the vast majority of instances, such physical contact results in a peaceful arrest or solution to the dispute.  In a few it involves a scuffle or worse.  Rarely, if ever, does it involve a confrontation by the officer with a lethal weapon, for the very simple reason that most people do not carry such weapons.\n\nHowever, arm EVERY police officer and the difference is apparent.  Every single time a member of the public comes into contact with a police officer he or she has the opportunity to become an armed criminal by the very simple expedient of overpowering the officer.\n\nMany of our new breed of officers are of very slight build - the smallest I ever saw (I left in 1998) was a 4'10" girl at Brixton, who was the same size as a 12-year-old girl.  It takes very little imagination to see how just about anyone could get her gun off her.\n\nThus, with every officer armed, every single incident they ever attend has the potential to become an armed incident.  This would require a profound change of policing practice which would be only of benefit to the police officers, who would be duty bound to protect themselves, and of no benefit whatsoever to the public who they serve.  Officers would have to become very aloof and distant.  That is the total antithesis of what we expect in a British police officer.\n\nWhat we DO need is an armed response that is available at very short notice - it was always my view that the system that I left was nowhere near good enough.  I understand that armed officers are more readily available nowadays.\n\nThe other measure that could be taken to protect society (including police officers) from armed criminals is a robust sentencing policy (which we aren't going to see).  In my view, anyone arrested for carrying a knife unlawfully should go to court in the first instance.  If convicted they should receive a custodial sentence of 12 months without remission.\n\nSimilarly, anyone convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm should receive an immediate custodial sentence of 14 years imprisonment.\n\nFinally, in your example of the house where the shooting took place, the decision not to enter was nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not the officers were armed.  It was a very poor management decision by a senior officer.\n\nUnfortunately, in these days of liberal academic senior officers, many of whom are selected to fill some sort of quota, such poor dec
257753
as compared to our "normal" police force?\n\ncompare:  both are enlisted to control mobs and maintain order.\ncontrast:  a hired mercenary knows his trade.  Our "badge and gun" officers don't care.  Unfortunately, we have too many "badge and guns" walking their beat.
930441
wtf is this question doing in the military section???
527642
You can't without being licensed as an animal control officer.  It is illegal everywhere to use said weapons on human beings, so don't even think about it.
164556
I had this private years ago who disobeyed a lawful order. I told him 3 times to do someting while we were in a truck. After the 3rd time I told him, he sucker punched me and was flailing me pretty good. I reached up, took the good old angle flashlight off of my LBE(it had one extra ring on it from an old flashlight) and hauled off and smacked that dude into next week with it. He got court marshaled,I got transfered out of that crappy unit that babied him to the point he thought he could get away with such things.He had a blsck eye for 2 months and a bad conduct discharge. THATS the best use of an angleheadflashlight I had.
853487
M58 Mine Clearing Line Charge (MICLIC) \n\nI was a Combat Engineer before I became an officer.
444490
I just took a look at kaylora's answer and frankly I don't see what the fuss is about. If this childish display of temper is how you act regularly, I too am worried about your ability to handle a rifle safely. Now I suppose you'll go and ask a snide question online about me, too.
91360
Tell the E-7 to just walk by a Coast Guard Officer and not salute...then he will see if they are part of the Military