gonzales or watson at TE?
921535
Early rumor has Gonzo out at least one more week.\n\nWatson is your guy, and arguably Brady's favorite target.
891577
not great back you got there, but i would sit leon, he is not very good and splitting time, i would go with jones-drew, and willams jones-drew is a play maker and can get you some points receving and rushing if he get the ball in his hands and williams is a strong runner with the same thing can rack up some yards if he get the ball in his hands
864060
I don't think Huard is a good option. Even though he is doing decently, he doesn't throw as many TD's as the other QB's available. Especially with Larry Johnson on that team. I would go with either Kitna and Romo as they are facing two of the worst passing defenses this year. But personally, I'm playing Romo just because the Redskins allowed 11 TD's with only 2 INT's. Plus it's the Cowboys vs Redskins, so you know the coaching staff with work harder to win this game. And lastly, Romo is only getting better, after completing 66% for a TD and 250+ yards, his numbers will only improve.
840091
Burress should always be starting for you, that's obvious. Then go with Branch because he's playing against the raiders and having a pretty good year. Then between Kennison and Jenkins is hard, Kennison is having a good year but is playing a decent team and still has an unproven QB. Jenkins is also having a great year, but hasn't proven himself to be as consistently good every game. He is however playing the dismal Detroit Lions, and has Vick, the 2nd hottest QB in the NFL after Donovan. It's a close call, but I say kennison because you're more likely to get at least some points, while Jenkins is no guarantee
946600
Never bench Reggie Wayne.  He's really come on strong this year, becoming a great physical presence opposite the more finesse-minded Marvin Harrison, which has served him very well in the red zone.  \n\nErnest Wilford is looking more and more like Jacksonville's only reliable receiver as dropped balls continue to plague the Jaguars, and he and Garrard seem to have good chemistry, so I'd start him as well.\n\nOf your other three receivers, I actually like Booker, as Brown has been cold lately and the Texans don't have a passing touchdown in their last three games.  Booker, on the other hand, has had some big games with Joey Harrington under center.  So if your league uses the standard 3-WR configuration, go with Wayne, Wilford, and Booker.
681459
I would definitely keep Beckett over Dontrelle, especially if you need wins.\n\nFlorida is awful and it won't be better anytime soon, plus Willis is struggling so far, SO it's a no brainer I think.\n\nI would drop Wood and keep Clemens, get a good starting pitcher to replace Wood and you should be fine. A good example of a a pitcher that will get you wins without killing your ERA or WHIP and that is probably laying on the FA list is  Woody Williams.
805773
I would start Fred Taylor, the TItan's defense isn't the greatest and he's had two good weeks prior.  Also the Jag's are starting their sencond string QB which means they will depend on the run more.
764319
watson and williamson. watson is bradys favorite target but he does get covered that way. Marcus robinson is out this week which opens the door for williamson who plays san fransisco.
543411
Assuming you mean offensive skill positions, I'll go with Vernon Davis  starting at the 49'er TE over Eric Johnson, although they will employ 2 tight end sets since no one else on the team can catch the ball.  TE's have the least to learn since they obviously have had to block in college.  No QB's or RB's will start - DeAngelo Williams will have the best chance to start for the Panthers; Young and Leinhart will ride the pine for AT LEAST a year, maybe even 2! WR's will definitely not start until maybe midseason since they have to learn how to the blocking game which is vital.
973994
Never sit Torry Holt unless he's injured or Bulger is out.... \n\nHolt is a must-start regardless of matchup.  Colston is #2 but New Orleans might get behind and become predictable.  Arizona just can't protect their QB, so avoid using them vs good defensive teams.
840513
I'd go with Hasselbeck.  He will be looking to prove that he is still the #1 QB.  Vick has been having problems lately, but he is unpredicatable.  Isn't McGahee still hurt? A-Train has been doing pretty decent recently, surprisingly. I'd stick with A-Train for now, if this is the only 2 choices you have.  How about Marion Barber, he available?  He'd be a better choice.
857848
Caldwell is not reliable\nBush has a good match up, but has Deuce on his team.\nGalloway is also in consistent.\n\n\nI would go with Bush
895099
Get crumpler. Arizona has amounted to nothing. As you said you can afford to lose a RB. You will be improving your TE status greatly in crumpler who is going to have a huge 2nd half.  However you forgot to mention your current QB, but Grossman can't hurt.
787300
I would also take Williams but lower your expectations as it is a windy day in Jacksonville today.  Do not expect much of a passing attack from the Jags.
939138
No. I am not going to do that. TEs are so inconsistent that you cannot trade a starting running back for a TE, unless their names are Gates or Gonzalez. I think what you should do is to see if you can counter them for something more, if you like your depth at RBs. Or like others said, free agents. Ben Watson should still be available. \n\nIf you accept you will lose too much, for a player who cannot get you consistent points anyway.
964108
Im in the same predicament - every week these guys points are very similar. I took Plummer as a free agent, but if I had to choose between the two would have started Palmer.
880709
I would go with Caldwell because Baltimore's D will most certainly give Palmer trouble throwing the ball and they also get interceptions.  Also, Caldwell will get more looks than Henry, who has to compete with Ocho Cinco and Housh.\n\nAs far as D, I think I'd give the edge to Jacksonville because Indy's run defense is pretty weak and V. Young is starting to play well.  That one's sort of a toss up though.