Do You think two Guys of equal size should settle differences in a Boxing Ring?
913914
Nah, lets do it like Hamilton and Burr, pistols at 10 paces.  The last man standing wins.\n\nHaving two people fight to settle a difference makes no sense.  Lets say that a modern day Bruce Lee was out there.  Would he always be considered right because he could beat up anyone who disagreed with him?  This would lead to a might makes right scenario and historically, that does not work.\n\nAlso, what about if Peewee Herman and Evander Hollyfield disagreed about something?  I admit, that would probably be pretty funny to watch, but all we would be settling is that Evander can hurt Peewee in oh so many ways.\n\nAn organized debate would make a lot more sense.  A mediator makes the most sense.
886717
Hmmm, from a guys perspective, I think he is a bad choice.  Boxers can generally get very angry very easily.  Don't expect your relatoinship to be long.  The only reason boxer guys get married is because they can get rich rich rich!
1087147
I use to love boxing but rarely watch anymore. I would have better fight cards, make the champ defend the belts more often 4 to 5 months against a top 3 contender, promote better, give better less expensive access to top fights. Don't know if I will ever love boxing the way I use to now that UFC and Pride are around
893460
Brent ~\n           In my opinion, every fighter that moves up in weight is slower regardless if it is something significant or something so minute that nobody even that fighter doesn't realize. Floyd has already proven that he has no punch the bigger he gets so this will not be a issue. The one thing that Floyd will have going against him is his physical size, usually the bigger man can push the smaller guy around once the smaller guy is caught.\n          One thing that will come into play will be what size ring this "fight" will take place in. The bigger the ring, the better off it will be for Floyd.\n          Look for Floyd to come in at 150 pounds no heavier, no lighter.
1149074
Kevin definitely has a natural size advantage and he seems to know the sport pretty well. Although we each are familiar with each other's answering styles, we don't have any fight tapes of each other to analyze. He'll be afraid to hit me because I'm a woman, and I'll be afraid to hit him because his daughters will probably be there watching. If it's just a bunch of light-punching, though, who wins would depend on how much of a reach advantage he has. If it's not too much, I'll probably be able to land more clean shots with quick jabbing while he might have some trouble getting past my defence since I'll have more preparation. If he has a much longer reach, though, I'm sure he'll have no trouble keeping me on the outside where only his punches will land.\n\nIn the end, though, it will go to the judge's scorecards and the winner will just be whoever they happen to like more. It's just an exhibition bout anyhow.
764310
a match should do the trick
753943
no thats perfect\n\njust work out and guys will dig it
9750
Boxing. It's a one-on-one competition of strength and skill.
907771
you aint got no ring on your finger go out with both of them see who looks better has a better body or a better dick it will all sort itself out lol.
991534
As the lesser opponent, I would appreciate fighting the champ or somone ranked higher than me.   Even if I don't win, I will learn something....even if it is not to get into the ring with the champ again.
33968
Yes I do, as do a lot of others\nWhy isn't there a section on boxing ?\nNeed some feedback.
113361
This has been an issue for many sports...And there are many valid points to arguments on both sides of the "women in men's sports" issue...\n\nOne basic argument against it is that most men would be hesitant to go full out physically against a women..thereby taking away from the competitive nature of a sport..i.e. A 250 lbs checker smashing a woman into to boards at full speed...\n\nIt is a dicey situation for sure...
831015
I can't see any of them "unifying" the Heavyweight Division for a couple of reasons, like Frank stated the politics involved. I'll elaborate since I just got finished reading an article last night on Boxing Scene. After Wladimir's win last night "unification" was tossed around at the post-fight press conference. When the match-up of Wladimir vs Valuev came up a spokesman for Don King Promotions (Valuev's Promoter) said if it did happen DK would have to be the Promoter and that the winner would be obligated to DK for at least two defenses of the title. Wladimir said in no uncertain terms he will not be obligated to Don King under any circumstances. So, forget those two getting together to "unify". \n\nMy second opinion why it won't happen (a viewpoint) is the division is made up of guys who are inconsistent. I wasn't impressed with Wladimir last night because he showed he still gets flustered in the ring, like he did after the cut (headbutt). Brock I now can dismiss altogether, he was pathetic. So ends his undefeated record. These two are reflections of the whole HW division, I wouldn't bet on any of these fights its too risky. One minute Brewster looks great the next fight he looks like Bone Crusher's Clone. \n\nThe division reminds me a lot of how it was in the early to middle 80s, the belts jumping around month to month and fight to fight. Don't look for it to change anytime soon. Thanks for the question.
963306
I really like how this is in the Boxing category.  You should hit him with a right cross as soon as it looks like he's trying to get fresh with ya.
906389
It goes back to the days when  circle would be drawn on the ground and the fighters had to stand in the circle.\n\nWhen the first rules for boxing were written in 1743, they kept the term ring because it was the small circle in the center of a fight area where boxers meet.\n\n1838 the first square ring was introduced.\n\nI like the concept that it is a small circle in the middle of a fight area where boxers meet, so even though it is square it still has a ring.
1185177
A boxer in such a situation could be charged with manslaguhter in one instance only.  That is if the blow that killed the opponent was a horridly blatant and intentional foul blow (i.e. illegal late hit, or hit to the back of the head)
903323
OH MAN, I know exactly what you mean, I'm 6'8 265 and I used to box (just to keep in shape) and I had similar situation with a guy (Napoleon complex) and wanted to fight.   Well I didn't box for fighting purposes but that didn't stop him.... so i finally caved in and fought the little Sh1t.... It took me about 45 seconds but i knocked him out and he never said another word to me.........