how one can good in organic chemistry?
920360
Space out your study time. Do a little each day. And do not get behind, otherwise you'll be in trouble. And most importantly, don't think of it as such a bad thing. Some parts of orgo are actually fun and interesting. You will make it hard or easy on yourself, depending on how you will tackle the course. Get a plan and stick to it and you'll do great.
2264
Ok...The most important element in organic chemistry is CARBON. Organic chemistry mainly is about organic compounds:alkanes, alkenes, arenes, haloalkenes, hydroxy compounds(aliphatic alcohols and ethers, phenols and aromatic alcohols), aldehydes and ketones, carboxylic acids, amines, polymers......wow, there are alot more, can't list all out dude....hopefully u know wat i hv listed out...
492805
well study hard and you will get your goal, be mentally strong cos its not an easy task, be very very good in biology and you need to study chemistry nicely as well.rest leave to god.
575820
For every one hour of class, 3 hours of study is recommended. If you want succeed Organic, try this time table. Lab will take 3 hours in class. To write the report 6 to seven hours will need to take place.\nTake General Chem at the same time, many things overlap.\nThen take 2 classes that are not BIO or MATH.
1139335
Depending on your age, and I'll assume 13 years plus, and educational background you might find these useful:\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemistry\nhttp://chemistry.about.com/od/generalchemistry/\nhttp://www.bris.ac.uk/is/library/subjects/chemistry/info/internetlinks.html\nhttp://www.asu.edu/courses/chm332/selfteach.html\nhttp://www.chemistrycoach.com/home.htm\n\nAmazon have a couple of titles:\nhttp://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0471121207/104-9823324-0256736?v=glance&n=283155\nhttp://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/034005543X/026-4394558-0184415?v=glance&n=266239
1144059
If you can hack law school (and I always give Sabe fans the benefit of the doubt), chemistry can be quite a help to you.  For one thing, you'd be surprised how much more the study of science provides a person with the methodical thinking required in law school as opposed to the fuzzy thinking of many who have neglected such studies.  The field of patent law could have a lot of possibility for you: there is always a huge demand, and a person has to have a science degree to do an important part of the patent field.  (I don't want to swamp you with details.)  Basically, you would have a unique ability to describe chemical compounds or processes in the very particular language required to secure patents on them.  Don't rush into law school, though.  It can give some people a hard time, even if they're very smart.  You have to really want to do it to get through, do the bar exams, and keep up with the educational requirements that continue as long as you practice.  If you're up for it, though, your chemistry degree could serve you well.
285473
Subject for the paper would be good. Chemistry would be different from business administration.
540370
The biggest trouble I had in organic was the reactions and mechanisms, like SN1 SN2 E1 E2, reactions with alkenes, reactions with alkynes etc.\n\nIf you're a visual person then I suggest looking up sites that have animations to help you understand the reactions. If you don't get it, just learn them by heart lol. But it's so much better to understand what happens during these reactions, you'll remember it better during the test.\n\nFor the other things... well really, memorization is all you can do.\n\nTONS OF PRACTICE REEEEALLY HELPS, ESPECIALLY IN NOMENCLATURE + REACTIONS/MECHANISMS!!!\n\nHere's a couple of sites to get you started.\n\nGood luck =)
1005052
Typically you can do most regular organic chemistry reactions with radiolabelled substrates. So for instance\n\nacetaldehyde + NaT4 -> CH3CTHOH\n\nCH3CTHOH + Na(129)I -> CH3CTH(129)I would work
1139988
It is probablly organic chemistry as that is a monster of a class.  If you are in college, many chemistry classes are part of a pre-med major, and they have certain tasks that are designed to weed out students unable to complete the tasks necessary.  I once asked my professors about this, since I was a Biology major looking toward teaching, and he said many schools do this, with the first chemistry class weeding out those who were nowhere near capable or ready, and then Organic Chemistry really forging the toughest candidates.\n\nIn other words, you are up late studying because the course you are in is designed to test your abilities in such a way that you will be ready for even harder tasks.  It may be a "plot" such as it is, but I can't find it in me to complain, since I'd rather not have a doctor that had "easy" classes.
349060
on anatomy books, or organic chemistry books, just ask the librarian and she'll tell you for sure, but you'll have to know a lot of biology and organic chemistry...
425033
Honestly how good is your chemistry to start with ? mine was awfull but getting your head in the books helps . Maths is always good to have but is more essential in inorganic chemistry . Organic is great and is a lot more logical and easier to learn providing you have a good base in chemistry . they are not impossible but you do need to realise which are you better at ....inorganic or organic if your maths is dodgy then go organic . or find a tutor and learn.
970634
One question at a time please!\n\nCarbon forms Covalent bonds.\n\n1 molecule of Carbon can form 4 bonds.\n\nLipids are formed from Carbon, Hydrogen, and Oxygen and consist of fatty acids, and esters, and glycerols.\n\nOkay, Organic vs. Inorganic Here are some of the most educated opinions on that subject that I have ever encountered:\n\n Ask A Scientist\nChemistry Archive  \n\nhttp://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/chem99/chem99286.htm\n\n--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nOrganic / Inorganic\n\nQuestion:\nI teach sophomores an introductory biology course.  When I cover the biochemistry section the terms organic and inorganic come up.\nI am not satisfied with the simplistic statement that organic chemicals are ones that contain carbon since it does not account for carbon dioxide being an inorganic. Is there a definition of 'organic chemical' which accounts for all\nor most molecules?\n doug happ\n \nAnswer 1:\n   Given the existence of hemoglobin, "zinc fingers" in some enzymes, and buckyballs, I'd guess not.\n christopher grayce\n\nAnswer 2:\nConsidering the number of carbon containing molecules that ARE considered to be organic relative to the number that are NOT, the rule that an organic molecule is one that contains carbon,  works VERY well. The "exceptions" might serve as a lead-in to a discussion of the use of rules, such as classifying molecules as organic or inorganic, as a contrived convenience.  They are helpful for most cases.  In the cases\nwhere the rules don't work well we have to be able to turn to other tools, such as an understanding of chemical bonds or molecular orbitals so we can concentrate on the characteristic of interest -- which is very rarely\nwhether the molecule is organic or more often things like reactivity. You're at the leading edge of helping these students think for themselves\nin a field where they probably feel unsure of themselves! It sounds like you have some inquiring students there and some active\ndiscussions.  May you have many more!\nGreg\n\nAnswer 3:  An interesting question.\nI believe that "organic" vs. "inorganic" originally stemmed from the ancient idea that compounds could be divided into two categories; those isolated from plants and animals (organic) and those extracted from minerals and ore (inorganic)\n[source: Bodner and Pardue, Chemistry: An Experimental Science, 1993].\n \nAs a working definition, now we think of organic chemistry as primarily being the chemistry of carbon-containing compounds. Most carbon-containing compounds have one or more of the\nfollowing: H,N,O,S,P. Some authors describe organic chemistry as the study of compounds that contain carbon and hydrogen. By this definition, CO2 would be "inorganic." But I would\nlike to stress that in fact there is no general agreement on such semantics, and I'd bet that a lot of chemists consider CO2 to be "organic" because it contains C and O.\nTopper
1021320
Chemistry is a foundation for many other disciplines.The scope of chemistry, therefore, is very broad.\n\nWhat u will gain from ur efforts, however, may be more than new knowledge about the environment n our personal realtion to it-u may improve ur learning skills and become a better thinker!
697543
development of drugs using biochemistry\nunderstanding of organic processes\nenergy production\nmany others
1135879
Beware of BIOCHEMISTRY(from my own experience.. all doctors in med school exprerienced a hard time in Biochem, even our scholars and Magna-cum-laude. But of course they got better grades than us). Biochemistery covers almost everything... (PROTEIN CHEMISTRY AND METAB, AMINO ACIDS CHEMISTRY AND METAB, CARBOHYDRATE CHEMISTRY AND METAB, LIPID CHEMISTRY AND METAB, VITAMINS, MINERALS, DNA CHEMISTRY AND METAB, ENERGY METAB, ONCOGENESIS Purine and Pyrimidine synthesis&Metab,,, ETC.) To make it short...Biochem today is MOLECULAR in approach that is why it also cover CELL BIOLOGY and physiology. \nSo my advise is to you is to take cell biology which i know is not complicated and easier.\nCheck out  BIochemistry of Harpers or Lippincott (the easier approach)...for you to find out\ni hope this  one is helpful to you!\nGoodluck!
420070
Applied chemistry is something I studied for 4 years. I also studied Highschool education.\n\nProblem is that many textbooks are biased to certain areas such as health, ultimately the best way to learn more about applied chemistry is to study it in a university that is known for teaching it well...\nIf you are unsure if you want to study it then I recommend visiting the university and asking at reception of the chemistry department if you can have a short chat with the lecturer, a good lecturer will be happy to tell you which books they use.\n\nThe main issue with Applied chemistry is that is actually about a method of thinking rather than an actual subject. It is where you use your knowledge of chemistry and apply it to real life situations. Rather than memorising a list of elements, what is more important is being able to know how to use those elements, where to use them, what to use them with.\nIn essence it is learnt only through practice in both real life and laboratories, not books.\n\nOne book that caught my eye and is good for final year secondary students would be:\n\nKatherine J. Denniston, J.J.T, Robert L. Caret 2004, "General, Organic, and Biochemistry, 4th ed, McGraw-Hill, Sydney.\n(a book used by university first year Health science students as a link of chemistry and health)\n\n\n\nAs a warning to potential aplied chemists... i can no longer drink a cup of tea without considering the numerous reactions, phase changes and substances that interact in the cup and then with my body. Hope you are willing to change your outlook on the world like that.