We've seen the current tactics of the Clinton war room & the seduce-me-please media back in 1964, haven't we?
912913
...and Johnson nixed the idea.
178194
remember the war clinton waged there? this is the effect.
316057
It's funny isn't it? They still talk about Clinton 6 years later, and he has been living that beautiful life. Anything that Bush screws up on, which is every week now, somehow President Clinton must have done it. Total ignorance! If they can't pick it off on Clinton then Abraham Lincoln did it. Bush and his followers are criminals to the U.S.. Vote them out!
861988
Not yet... and good point. Today seems to be over the top with rhetoric. Even I had to through a couple in there today. LOL
791589
They will find SOME excuse for bad Democratic behavior.  I could not even stomach the liberals during the Clinton years.  NO ONE said boo to ANY of his actions.  Perverts stick together, and I guess they are no better...
725837
I'll bite.\n\nFirst off - are you implying that ONLY Democrats are using attack ads & smear tactics???  Political attacks are as old as politics....if you can't see that your own side uses the same techniques - then you are a blind man.\n\n1)  Iraq was a diversion from the War on Terror and - as has been shown via multiple intelligence reports - our invasion into Iraq has actually increased terrorism & international hatred of the U.S.  The cons took their eye off the ball.  Al Qaeda & other such terrorist networks are as strong as ever & increasing in numbers.   More than 5 years post-9/11, bin Laden has not been captured.  Our military has been misused.  Richard Perle, staunch conservative, Secretary of Defense under Reagan, Chairman of the Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee from 2001-03, under the Bush Administration, has even said that, knowing what we know now, the invasion into Iraq was a mistake.  Democrats/liberals (most of 'em anyway) aren't saying that the War on Terror was a mistake - but the invasion into Iraq was a mistake.....there's a better way of fighting the War on Terror - but neoCons apparently REFUSE to acknowledge the mistake & do anything about it.\n\n2)  the unemployment stats are easy to manipulate & abuse.  What those stats do NOT show is what KIND of jobs are being created.  Bottom line is that manufacturing jobs in the U.S. decline on a daily basis.  The working class & middle class are shrinking.  Life is great at the very, very, very top.......the rest of us are in debt that we'll never get out of.  Replacing a good paying manufacturing job with 2 burger flipping jobs or 2 Wal-Mart jobs will show a decrease in the unemployment rate, but clearly doesn't tell the whole story.  \n\n3)  Again - prosperous times for who??  If you are insanely rich - then you are even MORE insanely rich than ever before.  There is a redistribution of wealth in this country - from the poor & middle class to the rich.  The salary differences between the top paid employee and the lowest paid employee in the average company has widened exponentially since the '70's.  Here's an analogy.......you're sitting in a bar with 99 other people - where everyone makes $40,000/year.   The average salary is, therefore, $40,000/year per person.  Now - Bill Gates walks in the bar.  I don't know how much Bill Gates makes a year, but, he's a little over 50 years old and apparently worth about $50 billion/year - so let's say Mr. Gates makes about $1 billion/year.  So - Bill walks in the bar.  There are now 101 people in the bar with an average salary of  $9.9 million/year!!  Wow!!  The economy in that bar is now insanely great, right??  Those are the stats - but clearly - the story has not been told.\n\n4)  I'm very glad we haven't had an attack since 9/11 - but that's only ON U.S. SOIL.  Terrorist attacks across the world have been out of hand - and although I'm certainly very relieved that no attacks have come here at home....I'm not so selfish as to close my eyes with the violence that has been happening elsewhere.  Our presence in Iraq has only escalated the violence.  Additionally - keep in mind that we had an attack on the WTC very, very early in the Clinton administration - on February 26, 1993 - slightly more than a month after Clinton took office.  There were no other (international) acts of terrorism on U.S. soil until the 9/11 attacks.  So - I'm assuming that you are a fair minded person and will admit that the Clinton Administration did its job EQUALLY well when it came to these matters.\n\n5)  I think the world would be a better place with Kennedy & Kerry in charge - relative to how the current administration is doing.  However - I think there are much, much better choices than them.  Neither Kennedy nor Kerry are ever going to be president - and Kerry isn't even up for re-election this year.  I think under Democratic leadership - we will tai
922359
Quite possibly.  Because when Clinton was in office gas prices rose before the elections and dropped right after.... talk about a conspiracy :P
1114120
Thankyou, I was not fully aware of this tactic, I  did however; observe that theme in his campaign.  as watcher,seer of the transformation to the one world organization. That IDIOT would have gotten into the office at any cost or collaboration,manipulation and denial of voters to vote(Ohio) or other extreme tactics to secure his hand in the fate and downfall of the United States. Is he not doing a marvelous job at that? People all across the Nation are waking up an illusion of manipulation inspired by the overseers who make sure and there agenda comes to fruition. Do not receive the RF ID,injections to a flu that is for the birds. And watch how what I say is coming to a town near you. Join the Revolution!
1003424
yep....considering that way back in the day, things were documented like they are now...I'd say people are making things up as they go when it comes to certain things in history.
892623
Maybe not as bad as it is today, but if Clinton would have allowed the missile strikes on Osama, then maybe none of this would have happened\n\nEDIT:  But as we all know, hindsight is 20/20\n\nEDIT2: Awwwww :)
348121
haha "the Clinton days were better!!!"  hahahah\nI guess the pres gettin some action is seen as more positive than a war.  Anyway, I want to know who Pres Bush has peronally killed or given orders to kill... anybody? *crickets*  Yeah that's right, that's what I thought.  On the other hand Saddam gave orders for thousands and thousands to be killed (ok allegedly, friggin PC nazis).  \nso to answer the question, the aspect I hate is blind ignorant bashings that are fueled by Kool Aid drinkers and the  liberal mass media, who will not admit that THEY are the mass media and the real sheep here.
539411
A Clinton baiter huh?  I'll take the 2 points but won't waste my time trying to  change your narrow, closed mind.  \n\nAre you the morality judge?
1148226
Possibly at some time in its history. Read the linked article.
834146
Yes I agree. You are spot on and it just goes to show how much influence the government and media have over us. The rubbish they printed in papers and showed on the t.v has been enough to still influence our way of seeing hippies even for people nowadays that aren't old to remember the 60s/70s. Look at the punks, people were terrified of me when I was a teenager in 1979 and I've never hurt anyone in my life! People believed what they read in the papers.
1056726
Actually, I suspect it is pretty much as it has been for most of our history.  A little research shows name-calling, rumor-mongering, "guilty until proven innocent" attitudes, and LOTS of whining about losing elections all through our history.\n\nFortunately, enough of us remember NOT to do these things, to instead disagree and dissent, even protest without rancor or undermining our own country and elected officials for political power. \n\nSome people did it to President Clinton, and claimed to be Republicans.  Now a bunch of Democrats do it and claim they represent all Democrats.  \n\nI'd call it silly, but it's really seditious.\n\nSome of us, including Democrats like myself, believe in what President Bush (and President Clinton before him) do because we know more about the complexities of the world.  For instance: my family left Islam before I was born.  Even back then they saw that Islam was making a push at world domination.  We are all still amazed at how many people just don't get that President Bush just pre-empted them before they were powerful enough to do it rather than wait and hope the world would band together in time.  Bush will go down as a villian, but he might have saved us all.\nPresident Clinton had access to the same information.  That's why he bombed Saddam more than once.\nWe're like children watching a board game, complaining about how the players aren't moving the pieces in the right direction, keep forgetting to jump other pieces, don't ever seem to crown their pieces correctly when they reach the far end of the board, and complain about how lousy the players are at playing checkers.\n\nWhile the players, patiently trying to explain, some giving up, some playing on the children's confusion to confuse them further and get their support, continue to play chess.\n\nWe're like that way too often.\n\nDon't follow blindly, but don't follow the opposition blindly, either.  Educate each other about all sides of an issue.
888036
RRROOOOFFLLL\nNice lil pic there mind if i use it?\nAnd we're in Iraq for Bush's ego which has turned on himself.
869135
I think it partially a coincidence.  There has been talk of strategy for several months now.  Support for the war is dwindling.  Its a constant attack, its not getting much better.   And, anticipating a dem win, they probably figured, they need one really soon.\n\nI think its a combination of things forcing the issue.