Could Mission Impossible 3 be one of the most over-hyped films for years?
915729
Ill never watch Tom Cruise again.\n\nHe is an America hater, and just a flat out nut job. He wont be getting anymore of my money.
987049
the movie is your basic adventure...very improbable, no plot, wierd party of survivors (a mayor who was a fireman, a navy guy who now isa  professional poker player, a gay architect who is sucidal, a illegal immigrant, the mayor's daughter, her bf, and a drunk texan). However, it is good in terms of action, lots of stuff blows up, decent special effects. However, I would take MI3 for action and plot over posideon or Da Vinci code too over posiden!
883115
I don't know episode III really sucked.  \n\nI don't think they will ever be able to perfect Star Wars!
489166
Yeah, it was a bad idea. You don't make worst-case-scenario disaster movies about potentially UPCOMING events. In very poor taste at the least, not to mention totally unoriginal.
56827
It's a beautiful movie, but yes, the plotline is overused.
133481
I think this movie will be descent.  Bryan Singer did do a good job with the first two X-Men films.  This new Superman movie can't be worse than Superman III and Superman IV: The Quest for Peace.  I will miss Gene Hackman though.
1161791
OK I actually saw a pre-screening of the film last night and let me tell you it is BAD. It is long and very boring, there are two action scenes in it and they last about 5 minutes each and even then they are not all that interesting, for the 2 hours and 30 plus minutes that the film is you would think that it could be a little more interesting. Most of the movie is getting re acquainted and crap like that it is slow and stupid it will not live up to the hype and that I can guarantee. I don't recommend this one at all.
672999
I could not STAND that movie. I didn't really even like the third one that much. The first two were the best. They are just trying to make as money as they can because the first two were successful. It's time to give it up already. It's just like making Home Alone 3 and 4...waste of time....you are 100% right.
741717
yes, but I don't care for the music. I think that movie is soo overestimated.
223237
The Usual Suspects is probably one of my top ten favorite movies of the past few decades. That said, I don't really see how they could make a sequel, since the whole allure of the movie is in the last 5 minutes.  Realizing that the entire story is just a fabrication of Verbal/Keyser's imagination is a great plot device, but what are they going to do for an encore??  The minute you sit down in the theater you'll be waiting for the big twist at the end and doubt everything that came before.  I just don't think it would be worth it.  Of course I would be first in line to see it though.  I'm not stupid. ;oP
201077
of course people who came into v for vendetta hoping to see a nonstop action flick will be somewhat disappointed but it does leave u thinkin about governments and terrorism. They call V a "terrorist" and in some ways he completely is. He explodes building and inflicts fear into others to get his point out but the thing that really makes u think is that one mans "terrorist" is another mans freedom fighter
288956
I enjoyed it, however I feel a lot of it's success came from good timing. While the movie had innovative fight sequences, I felt the story was a bit lacking and I know it probably confused some people.  The fight sequences gave it a word of mouth at a time when the movie industry was looking for "something different." When they saw how well the movie did, it got the sequels greenlit fairly easily with money potential and not necessarily story potential.  The second and third one seemed jumbled in the story, making too much out of too little and relying on it's "innovative" style that had now been copied by many rip-offs and spoofs.  Style over substance killled the sequals to an origional that wasnt all that it probably could have been anyways.  I think without the fight sequences this would have flopped, kind of like how a year earlier 'Dark City' flopped despite a great story and innovtive technology.  'Dark City' didnt have the 'It' factor, and the Matrix did which led to it's successs and eventual bad sequals that were hurried along to make money by capitilizing on it's no longer origional style.
197536
seen all 3 in theatres\n\nso many ways to go.....\n\nscary!
54623
Probably not. I actually enjoyed the first one. The comic Hellblazer (which the movie is based off) is better. But there probably won't be because it didn't do to well in the Box Office.
1012505
I don't think so.  It is the Return of the Magnificent seven
78618
I think its a part of the consequences of the mysterious plague that seems to have banished all writers in Hollywood into some black hole. It seems that all movies that come out now are either remakes of old movies, or remakes of TV shows. It seems to me that it's a terrible trend that just demonstrates the lack of writing talent in the industry.
448493
The film "Flight 93" will likely follow the media's portrayal of the event. Personally, it's a beautiful story of human courage, but it's simply implausible. All those people getting through on their cell phones? From an altitude of 30,000 feet? With all the conceivable cell phone traffic already on the airwaves generated by the days events? It's preposterous, but I would be well impressed if the forthcoming film would delve into these possibilities.