Examples of Carnivores?
913482
Felines (cats and lions)\nCanines (wolves, coyotes, dingos, African wild dogs)\nVampire bats\nkiller whales\n\ncertain birds such as\neagles\nhawks\nkites\nbuteos
370678
The first example would be "halpodiploidy" that occurs in bees, ants and wasps. In this form of asexual reproduction, females lay unfertilized eggs. The eggs can then hatch without fertilization, giving an asexually produced male, or they can be fertilized by a male, giving a sexually produced female.\n\nA second example would be "parthenogenesis" (Greek for "virgin birth"), seen in some fish, reptiles and amphibians. One commonly studied reptile species, the lizard Cnemidophorus neomexicanus, contains only females. All progeny contain the exact genetic information as its mother, essentially making it a clone. The females still engage in lesbian sexual behavior, which is thought to stimulate the laying of eggs. No genetic information, however, is transferred during this sexual act.\n\nThere are many other examples, and the previous answer touched on a few. I would add that anthrax is a bacterium, and therefore NOT a many-celled organism.
496538
Predation: lion and gazzeles\nparasitism:humans and tape worms. \nhope i helped!
891425
carnivore eat animals eating grass,grass take energy from sun
167173
THE CAT THROUGH EVOLUTION \n\nNote for Pet Owners:\nIt should be noted that all cats - including domesticated species - are obligate carnivores and they cannot survive without ingesting nutrients derived from animals. CATS MUST NEVER BE FED AN EXCLUSIVELY VEGETARIAN RATION.\n\nTopics on this Page:\nEvolutionary evidence\nGeneral characteristics of cats\nThe archeological record\nDomestication\nAnatomical characteristics\nDNA sequencing\nFunctional characteristics\nPictorial artifacts and written records\n\nEvidence\nThere are several ways in which the evolution of a species can be traced - but none of the existing records are complete - even for humans. As a result, we have to speculate about the missing "links" in the historical evidence.\n\nIn zoological classification cats belong to the Class : Mammalia (mammals - hair covered animals that suckle their young with breast milk), the Order : Carnivora (they are carnivores - they eat meat) and the Family: Felidae. Within this family there are three further subdivisions called genera (Panthera (cats that roar), Acinonyx (the Cheetah) and Felis (all other "small" cats)), and each genus contains individual species. A species of cats is a group that normally breeds and produces fertile offspring (see section on DNA below)
184850
In biology, a primary consumer eats plants and other producers, and a secondary consumer eats primary consumers. \n\nExample: primary; rabbits\nsecondary; owls
578308
They have the short, simple digestive system of a carnivore that is very tolerant of rotting food full of bacteria.\n\nSome reptiles are also very tolerant of rotting food.
1153772
Pretty much any carnivore will eat bats if they can catch them, that is why bats spend all day hiding in caves, hollow logs and so forth. Any bat that ventures out in daytime will be eaten within minutes.\n\nThe list of predtaors includes all the usual suspects such as cats, dogs, snakes, racoons, hawks, shrikes and so forth but also includes almost any carnivore you can imagine. I've seen bats being eaten by crocodiles, spiders, other bats and, as kawaii holwingwolves aid, by frogs. Bats ae incredibly small animals and are weak even for their size making them prey for almost anything at all that can catch them.\n\nAs for how bats get rabies, normally the disease is transmitted from bat to bat directly which removes any need for the animals to be attacked by another rbaid aniamnl and survive. In the real world the chances of any bat surviving an attack by a predtaor are effectively nil.\n\nYou should also realise that rabies is present in an extremely low proportion of bats. Bat biologist Edward Stashko of Oakton College, Des Plaines, Illinois, estimates that less than one-half of 1 percent of bats are rabid. He says many common misconceptions about bats, such as that they can carry rabies and infect humans without themselves being affected by the disease, grew out of faulty scientific research from the 30s, no doubt conducted at the behest of the rat lobby.\n\nAccording to a 1982 report in National Wildlife, only ten people in the U.S. and Canada have contracted rabies from bats in more than 30 years. Exclaims Dr. Stashko: "More people have died from lawn mowers than from bats. Statistically you have a better chance of being hit by lightning than being bitten by a rabid bat."\nAccording to the CDC, by far the highest incidence of rabies among animals tested occurs not in bats but in skunks.
1171485
This is all a question of perspective. Many organisms are predator and prey at the same time. A bass eats a minnow and is thus a predator, but the bass is eaten by an osprey or a human and is thus also prey. There are only a few organisms at the very bottom of the food chain (like plants) that are almost exclusively prey, and a very few organisms at the top of the food chain (like humans, lions, and osprey) that are primarily predators and rarely prey.\n\nBiochemically, most organisms are actually very similar, with the exception of those organisms that are only prey and have specializations for making their own food from inorganic sources (for example, photosynthesis and chemosynthesis). When life first formed, all organisms that existed could make all the nutrients they needed by some sort of autotrophy (photosynthesis is an example of autotrophy). However, some organisms found that they could do better by taking the molecules that other organisms produced (by eating them) rather than making their own. Thus, the first predators were created.\n\nOrganisms that used this strategy accumulated many specializations that made them better predators. Mobility, vision, and teeth are all adaptations that help a predator take organic molecules produced by others. Many sorts of behaviors also make a better predator—stalking behavior is a good example. The neuronal circuitry in the nervous systems of predators enables the behaviors. These adaptations took hundreds of millions of years to evolve.\n\nThe first predators, the ones living in the soup that spawned life, probably did nothing more complex than bump into their prey (they were only single celled and did not have anything like a multicellular brain). In the time since then, though, as organisms achieved multicellularity and increased complexity, they have become increasingly sophisticated in the behaviors they use to gather food from prey.
1044200
They are eaten. If not by carnivores then by bacteria, fungi, and invertabrates. Think "circle of life" from the lion king.Then they go to that big perch in the sky.
656893
Grass grows.  Grazing animals (herbivores) eat grass and convert it to flesh.  Meat eating animals (carnivores) catch and eat herbivores.  Carnivores die.  Bacteria, fungi and other micro-organisms cause decay.  The decay products help fertilse the grass so it can grow, and the process repeats.\n\nIt is a little more complicated than that, but the  basics are as set out above.
307999
The first level consumers are the animals feeding on the plants.  Examples would be mice.  Not to be confused with decomposers, which are the bacteria.
142064
Predatory animals...  Birds, and Owls that might eat them.\n\nAvailability of mate.... Without a mate there would be no reason to be in the area/ they wouldn't be producing a population to sustain life in that area.
158716
Depends what kind of animals! Some eat other animals.  Some forage under the snow for food.  Some eat tree bark, etc.  Some get fed by humans.
687278
OMNIVORES \nEats live prey and plants \nOSTEOMALACIA \nSoftening of the bones \nOVIPAROUS \nReproduces by laying eggs\n\nOr...\nOdd
708537
Other than dinosaurs? \n\nMammoths, Mastadons, Giant Sloth, Sabertooth tiger, Passanger Pigeon.
639125
Carnivore -- NSA\n\nFor you, probably SpyBot Search and Destroy