Explain the difference between the rates of reaction with potato as compared to liver.?
931071
umm what reaction??  this sounds suspiciously like something having to do with catalase producing hydrogen peroxide (an AP Bio lab), in which case the liver would have a higher reaction rate because there is more of the substrate than there is in the potato.... and i'm blanking on the rest, sorry.
378538
:-)\n\nANOTHER blood question!\n\n:-)\n\nSee this page for the reference ranges:\n\nhttp://www.uq.edu.au/vdu/HDUReferenceRanges.htm
763720
You should do your homework on your own,,, Besides, I sat here for a few minutes and I could not figure it out.\n\ncirrhosis (of the liver)
512503
likely to be due to the osmotic gradient set up due to the high carboydrate concentration in the cytosol.\n\non the other hand, who cares?
708100
Substrate Concentration: If all other conditions are held constant, the rate of the reaction should increase with increasing concentrations of substrate. At very low values of substrate the reaction rate will increase very rapidly. At higher substrate concentrations the rate begins to level off. Eventually the maximum rate for that reaction will be achieved and further increases in substrate concentration will have no effect\n\n\nHope this helps :)
414975
They are both the same medication, one just delivers to your body faster. No problem. However, acetomenophen is hazardous to you liver if you drink.
1125729
The index-of-reaction equation (i.r.e.): dF/dtZ = kZ(l - βF)m is compared with a generalized Prout-Tompkins equation (g.P.T.e.): dF/dt = kn(l - βF)y With the boundary condition F = 0, t = 0 the equations are equivalent for z = 2 or m = 0 or β ≤ 1 and the i.r.e, is closely approximated by the g.P.T.e. for other values of the parameters by use of the following approximation ∫(1- F)-m dF ≈ AF(1-BF)5 The parameter s is a function of m. Both A and B are close to unity for 1/3 < m < 3. The i.r.e. is recommended as being more useful than the g.P.T.e. because the i.r.e. has a better theoretical basis and because it is more readily integrated and fitted to experimental data.
1114647
If I'm not wrong, the two are directly proportional - the more the nutrients in the soil, the more they would favour plant growth by the synthesis of proteins and hence better and greater yield. \nBut I think this would go on till a certain point ( it might be the saturation point or something). I mean, if your bestow the soil wholly with more minerals and nutrients than the plants need, it won't give you more yield, because then the yield rate will be limited by other factors such as light and carbon dioxide. If you then increase the latter two factors, then the yield will increase again.\n\n[Again, I'm not sure about this....someone please correct me if I'm wrong!!]\n\nEDIT: Ah, there you go.....Fred gave a more thorough explanation.
186641
Beef liver has a very high iron content.  Proper storage and thorough cooking techniques will prevent any foodborne diseases.
159821
Dear\nGOthrough this link\nhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=toxicity%20of%20securidaca%20longepedunculata%20(violet%20plant)&hl=en&lr=&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2006-01,GGLG:en\nu might get what you want exactlly
894688
rest is more required to the hepatistis patient. coconut water can be taken as many times as possible. only easily digestable vegetables can be taken with out oil. salt in take for quite some time can avoided. ghee or any fat content can be strictly avoided atleast 4to 5 moths until the liver comes to normal staze. laboratory tests can be conducted for every 15 days and the condition can be shown to u r doctor and take his suggestions.and accordingly medicines can be used.wish the speedy recovery.
454133
Good question. Well your liver and kidneys can put up with a lot, but some things they just cant process. Like for instance too much carrots can turn you yellow, and thiamine acid can turn you reddish, but it would take a lot to do so. Also each person is different so consult your doctor. Bit from my point of view eating healthy is OK, just REALLY mo niter those supplements because accidents happen, and it could really hurt you. Your best bet is just to go talk to a doctor or nutritionist
938849
For every 10 degrees Celsius the reaction rate tends to double.  But when you raise or lower the temperature of the body so that the temperature is outside of a small range of temperatures, the enzymes and proteins do not work efficiently or at all.\n\nLower or Raise the temperature enough and you kill the organism unless it is a simple one cell thermophile bacteria.
1130492
After a large, starchy meal, the amount of alcohol naturally produced may result in a blood level of 0.005 percent or more. Our body naturally rids itself of alcohol in this way via the liver and this enzyme.
991160
A wide variety of things can cause this.  You can learn about the most common ones by clicking on the different Liver categories on the following list\n\nhttp://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/encyclopedia_L-Ln.htm\n\nBest wishes!
1129489
this is why i love yahoo answers you always learn something new by answering people's questions..."Crops improved through biotechnology have undergone more safety and environmental testing than any crop varieties in history, and have been produced and consumed by humans and animals in millions of tons around the world for years. They have been proven as safe as the scientific method permits, by every valid method known to science and medicine. There is, to date, not a single solitary confirmed case of human or animal illness or disease associated with a biotech crop. Nor has a single negative environmental impact been credibly attributed to biotech-improved varieties."\n\nIs that so? The following cases show that there is reason to be concerned about the safety of GE foods.\n\nPusztai's Potatoes \n\nQuestions over the safety of GE foods were raised as far back as in 1998, when renowned scientist Arpad Pusztai, of Scotland's Rowett Research Institute, tested an experimental GE potato on laboratory rats. At the time of this experiment, there was very little in the peer-reviewed scientific literature on the safety of GE foods (a full two years after their introduction into the market!); Pusztai's was the first independent study to that end. \n\nThe rats fed on the GE potatoes suffered substantial damage to their immune systems, plus abnormal weight loss in various organs, including the brain, testicles and liver. Some also had abnormal growth in their intestinal cells, which could indicate a prelude to cancer. Despite a long and concerted industry campaign to discredit Pusztai, part of the results of his GE potato study were duly peer-reviewed and published in the scientific literature. However, despite the industry and scientific establishment dismissing his work, there has been little attempt made to independently repeat and confirm the study, as is usually the case in science. Pusztai has published other results of his experiments since, which raise serious question over the safety of GM foods.\n\nThe Independent Science Panel\n\nIn 2003, Pusztai joined over a dozen colleagues with expertise in agroecology, agronomy, botany, medical chemistry, ecology, microbial ecology, nutritional biochemistry, physiology, toxicology and virology, to form the Independent Science Panel. The group released a report on GE crops and foods that reviewed the literature and concluded that:\n\n* Contrary to the claims of proponents, these crops have not been proven safe. The regulatory framework was fatally flawed from the start. It was based on an anti-precautionary approach designed to expedite product approval at the expense of safety considerations.\n\n* By far the most insidious dangers of genetic engineering may be inherent in the process itself.\n\n* There have been very few credible studies on GE food safety. Nevertheless, the available findings already give cause for concern.\n\n* There is already experimental evidence that transgenic DNA from plants has been taken up by bacteria in the soil and in the gut of human volunteers.\n\n* Transgenic DNA is known to survive digestion in the gut and may jump into the genome of mammalian cells, raising the possibility for triggering cancer.\n\n* There has been a history of misrepresentation and suppression of scientific evidence in the promotion of agricultural biotechnology. Key experiments were not performed, or were performed badly and then misrepresented.\n\n* Sufficient evidence has emerged which raises serious safety concerns, that if ignored could result in irreversible damage to health and the environment. GE crops should be firmly rejected now.\n\nThe Mon 863 Report \n\nOn May 22, 2005 the British daily The Independent reported the existence of a secret Monsanto report about its genetically engineered Mon 863 corn variety. According to the 1,139-page report, rats fed this corn for 13 weeks had abnormally high white blood cell counts, something that happens normally
1039304
Salt is an impurity which increases the boiling point of water.  This causes more heat to be supplied to the potato and thus cooks it faster.