low blow or fat chance?
912311
your fat and low to the ground so both
91972
Not to bring your hopes down, but if you don't have the genetics, you will not get the 6-pack abs, no matter how hard you try.  Now, I'm not saying forget it and live a life of a slob, but temper your expectations.  Eat healthy (low fat, moderate carbs), Do Cardio work regularly, change your workouts from time to time and you will have a healthy look and body.  Spot training doesn't work, so don't focus on your stomach so much, but in your body as a whole.
103675
what does fat & not pretty have to do with it? give yourself a break. as long as you're a fun likable person your chances are just as good an anyone elses. i'd rather hang with a funny fun exciting riot of a woman and have a woot of a time than some stiff allways worried about their hair getting flat. just be who you are cause that it what you want people to fall in love with!
551226
200-225 24 points\n175-200 22 points\n30 extra points for the whole week. Use them wisely. If you get everything low fat you can eat alot!
254906
Little Fat?  Work out at a moderate intensity for a long period of time.  Cut fat to 20 percent of your diet.
691596
themselves and chance
878439
short - puffs you out\nlong - you get more puff
839763
may be a little low......
226927
Desired LDL is less than 3.4 mmol/L
91878
smoke u another fat one
698606
Hmm, interesting question, actually, and a practical application of math.  Hey, all you folks who ask what this stuff is good for, here is a real-life situation where you can use it!\n\nGetting to the problem.  Obviously, the contestant to go last spins again if his score is lower than the best score.  If tied, there is a spin-off where his winning chance is 50%; so, if there is a tie, he should respin if he has 45 or less (giving him at least 11 out of 20 good numbers), not spin if he has 55 or more (giving him at most 9 out of 20 good numbers - better to go to the spin-off, where he has a 50% chance), while 50 is a "push".   \n\nNow, for the contestant to go 2nd to last: First, let's assume the first player busts (of course, the second player respins if his score is lower than the first player), which essentially makes this a two-player game.  Based on what number the second player stops on, this is the winnning percentage I calculate for the last player:\n\n100 - 4.875%\n95 - 14.375%\n90 - 23.375%\n85 - 31.875%\n80 - 39.875%\n75 - 47.375%\n70 - 54.375%\n65 - 60.875%  \n60 - 66.875%\n55 - 72.375%\n50 - 77.375%\n\nSo, you may think the second player should respin whenever his odds are under 50%, but that is actually incorrect.  For example, if the second player has 70, giving him a 45.625% chance of winning, respinning would give him a 70% chance of going bust - he is better off stopping with the 45.625% chance.  To determine whether or not respinning improves the second player's chances, a second calculation is needed that considers each of the 20 scores after the second spin - some of them bust the player but the others improve his chance of winning.  Based on that, here is a new table, giving the last player's chance of winning if the second player respins with the score given:   \n\n95 - 95.24375%\n90 - 90.9625%\n85 - 87.13125%\n80 - 83.725%\n75 - 80.71875%\n70 - 78.0875%\n65 - 75.80625%  \n60 - 73.85%\n55 - 72.19375%\n50 - 70.3125%\n45 - 69.68125%\n\nSo, comparing the two tables, the critical points are 55 and 60.  If the second player has 60, he should stop - the last player's chance of winning improves if the second player spins.  At 55, however, the second player should spin, improving his odds by about 0.2%.\n\n\nMoving on to the three player game... now it gets really messy.  The player to go first needs a score that can beat the other two players.  Does he stop on 55 again, hoping the other two players both bust?  He'll need a better score than that to have a 50% chance of winning, but, as was noted in the two-player analysis, stopping with a 30% chance can be better than making a second spin.  As for how to do a complete analysis, uh, beats me.  This may require a computer to do all the math.\n\n* * * * * *\n\nThinking about the three-player game, maybe it isn't as messy as I initially thought - the only additional consideration for the first player, as opposed to the second player, is that either player will stop if the first player's score is beaten.  This can be calculated from the first table.  For this table, listed is the chance of the first player losing (i.e. either player beats him) if he stands on the score given:\n\n100 - 9.51% \n95 - 26.68%\n90 - 41.29%\n85 - 53.59%\n80 - 63.85%\n75 - 72.31%\n70 - 79.18%\n65 - 84.69%\n\nSimilar to the two-player game, I can now calculate the odds if the first player decides to respin.  Since I’m getting a little tired crunching these numbers, for this last table I’ll only list the critical ones:\n\n70 - 83.4%\n65 - 82.3%\n\nIn other words, the first contestant should respin on 65, stop on 70.\n\nIn conclusion, I think the optimum strategies are.....\n\nFirst player: spin on 65, stop on 70\n\nSecond player: spin on 55, stop on 60 (assuming his score at least matches the first player)
707590
Appears to be OK. Play an extra hour of basketball this week. That might be the turkey, but it's lean.\n\nGood luck
542737
and Low Fatt is a skinny Chinese gal.\n\ncheers, Some Yung Guy
1061035
the chances are very small but know one nows \n \n\n\nimpossible to answer this question
261711
Hey Man,\n\nI've been looking over the claims that Gakic makes. I can't imagine that it would be "eating" your muscles up. Are you eating enough protein and carbs? Your muscles can get eaten up if your bofy fat percentage is already low and you are exercising, as well. I'm thinking of trying Gakic and I dould use some advice. If you get a chance, shoot me a message. \n\n-Spooker
426895
Depends on your metabolism and body fat. For most people I would assure a few days.
862155
John above there is quite right - a little can become a lot!\n\nThis is true of everything.  Are you the kind of person who "can't eat just one" potato chip?  If so, watch out!  It can escalate.  Now, I think a black 'n mild is a little cigar...which you don't inhale.  cigars and pipes are safeR than cigarettes but can still lead to oral cancer.  This is like condoms are safeR than unprotected sex\n\n(sidebar: ....you could have one break and there's evidence people can tranmit  condyloma (genital warts!) while wearing a condom, so it's all relative!)\n\nAll that said, I think IF you smoke a little cigar once a month, (and don't go to cigarettes or crack or something else, and don't go to 3x/day) the overwhelming ODDS are that something ELSE will kill you before those cigars.  Heart disease, an unrelated cancer, a bus......  I may go to Dentist Hell for saying that, but it's the same w/ many things..unless you're talking about a SUPER addictive drug (crack, heroin, meth) a little here and there PROBABLY won't kill you.  I, for one, still drink Coke now and then and don't always remember to floss, so....\n\nBut exercise, gum, yoga are all better.  yay!