How to evaluate that the Test Cases covers all the Functionality?
921878
Whatever you are working on, it is probably part of a development methodology. If the methodology is sound, there should be a function requirement documentation or product requirement specification. Different methodologies adopt different names but the idea is the same; that the required specifications/features are documented.\n\nTo check that the test cases are fully covered, one would have to look at every single requirement that is spelled out in the requirement document and see that it is represented in the test plan/test case documentation. If there are new features introduced into the product during development, these features need to be updated into the requirement documentation.
746120
Can you be more specific?  Testing for what?
425844
Go to http://www.pcpitstop.com/ and run the full system test
435278
IEEE 829 - Test Procedure Specification (TPS)\n\n\n...did you SEE the memo about the new cover sheet?
890914
The best tool you can use for testing web apps is your own browser. That is the same tool everyone is going to be using to access the web app too, so why not make sure that it is bug free using the tool everyone is using?\n\nNow there are a few tools for testing server-side code that you wrote for a web application. I have added several links to testing "frameworks" for some common server-side languages.\n\nHope this answers your question to your satisfaction.
59490
tools used for automated testing.
407108
AFTER BETA VERSION TEST..  :-)
563727
Possible test cases can inclued,\n\nClient side:\n1) Test the from for the system's response to incomplete or blank mandatory fields.\n2) Test validations for minimum length of name or any other such fields and for responses for invalid special characters include\n3) Test conditions for minimum length of password.\nServer side.\n1) Check the existance of duplicates.
230362
your local library probably has test helpers
722181
What I usually do is surf a book site like amazon, barnes & noble, chapters and when I find a book that appears to be what I want, I then do a search on a file sharing network for an ebook version of it.\n\nI know it is not the most legal way of doing it, but for personal use I think it would be ok. \n\nJust so you know, from one programmer to another, I have found very few books dedicated strictly to testing. You are better off looking at general "programming design and good practices" types of books which will also have several chapters dedicated to good testing... both system and unit testing if it is a really good book.
514671
These may help:\n\nhttp://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=types+of+software+testing&btnG=Google+Search&meta=
655749
http://it.aquent.com/Services/Solutions/qa.html
1032230
White box testing is testing from the inside--tests that go in and test the actual program structure. \n\nBasis path testing: Very simply, test every statement in the program at least once. You'll note that the testing department at FCC chose test cases that did this; the entire execution tree was covered. \nBasis path testing is MANDATORY--so much so that there are software products written especially to assist in it. \n\n\nProfiling: There are a lot of tools--often included with compilers--which show where the CPU is spending most of its time in a program. Naturally, the busiest parts of the program are the ones you want to test most. \n\nLoop tests: Exercise each DO,WHILE,FOR, and other repeating statements several times. \n\nInput tests: As the old saying goes--garbage in, garbage out. If a procedure recieves the wrong data, it's not going to work. Each procedure should be tested to make certain that the procedure actually received the data you sent to it. This will spot type mismatches, bad pointers, and other such bugs (these are common!)
939315
Check this page\nhttp://www.evaluationengineering.com/archive/articles/1004/1004conformance_test.asp\n\nIt will give you the right info.
585638
the developer who wrote the code should do unit testing.
50603
Pick up an existing case that is already done. List all the manual processes that you followed. Try mapping the same on the App.(In case you were still planning an application then you could see whatever solution fitted best your manual process). Once that is achieved -you will have to review and fine tune the steps involved. Try this with a sample of contacts -look for variations in processes and events.\n\nEventually you should be able to achieve a smooth run.
571081
testing is that this software contain any error or not.\n\nbut Quality Center always looks that this software Work's Fine , Faster & also on given requiremens or not.