Why don't I talk about (on my show) all the Republicans who say this war was mis-manged and screwed up?
914729
Hey now, don't forget about me, I am well connected and know way more than all of those azz hats combined, lol.
837126
if you would actually listen to these so called sniveling whining lap dogs you would see they all say bush is wrong in this area and he is siding with the dems to allow this kind of thing to happen.  why dont you listen and not just look for Rs next to peoples names.\n\nI exclude rush because he is a water carrier. he even said that two days ago.
780031
Well Kerry did make a bad joke that backfired...\nAll Bush did was create a civil war BLOODBATH\nand has killed thousands upon thousands of \nINNOCENT HUMANS...Yeah...I can see why the\nRepublicans are DESPERATE to change the subject!\n(But its NOT working...heh heh!)
750494
Its simple, its called the parrot syndrome.\nSee everything you say is true and makes a very good point and it shows why we are winning the war, but the reason we are losing the war is the Parrot syndrome.\nThe Parrot syndrome is basically you have a bunch of uneducated, unmotivated people in the United States who watch the liberal news.  The liberal news doesn’t like our President because some of these media giants are backed by liberal idiots.  So they bad mouth our president and the job he is doing. (if the same thing was happening with a dem president, the media would think they are doing a wonderful job with the war).  Anyways, these people watch this liberal news and instead of using common sense or looking at the facts themselves, the just run around saying the war is going bad, they repeat what the news told them, this is the parrot syndrome.\nSo to answer your question we are not even close to losing the war on the front lines.  Its back at home we are maybe losing the war and the terrorist know this.  That’s why they don’t throw all there troops at us because they would lose in a sec.  This way they can just poke at us until the liberals want out.\nIt’s a shame because all the troops lives may be lost because the dems don’t want to finish the job.
751473
If you're so bloody concerned and informed about politics, why can't you spell John Kerry properly? As long as we're on the subject, why are you unaware that Kerry was refering to the almight GWB being "stuck in Iraq" and not to the soldiers themselves?\n\nI've had enough of this uber-republican right-wing ranting from people who haven't a clue what is going on in this country. I demand answers.
365877
I am chilled, thanks.\n\nI for one realize that the Bush administration are using this as a distraction from the real issues that should be in the public focus. Because we have mid-terms coming up in November, the Republicans need two or three bulls*** platforms with which to enrage their 'base'.\n\nI'm glad to say that so far it doesn't seem to be working. This issue was supposed to start a national debate that would last until the elections. Now that we're almost into May it seems to have been largely forgotten.
643074
The war is wrong no matter who supported it. Besides, you can get yourself into a half-baked idea and later realize it was foolish. That's the real problem with what's going on; we refuse to pull out and spare American lives and resources.
790847
I dont think they take any notice of the current ten so NO because that would be one that they will never be able to ignore.Also the fact that none of the republicans in government has ever been able to recite them on TV (look up=Stephen Colbert and Congressman on youtube).
887247
Boy, you people are something.  I agree that there are people out there that just hate the military.  I have run into a few, they call me a murderer, mercenary, and all sorts of things.  But for a veteran to say he thinks that the war is a bunch of lies, that just tells me that you must have forgotten a few things since getting out.  The President will see more information than the public will ever see, and with this war the majority of the decisions he can choose to make are between two really bad choices.  It really bothers me that people think the President is doing such a horrible job, when they themselves couldn't do any better.  If you were President what would you do pull the troops out?  OK, what would you do when the fight follows them back here?  How would you react when we lose our Allies by pulling out?  How would you expect to recover the American way of life after you screw everything else up?  Before you criticize the President why don't you think about the desicions he has to make knowing that every move he makes is under the microscope.  Most of our troops know more about the war than civilians will ever know, and most of our troops support it and volunteer to go back.  When we declared war on terrorism Iraq was put in the crosshairs because it was supporting terrorism.  We did not declare war on just those involved on 9/11 we declared war on terrorism and any supporters of terrorism.  \n\nSince opinions are like ***holes, I know everyone is going to say something about me.  Frankly, I have probably heard worse than what you people could say about me, so if you really want to try and make me feel bad, embarass me, or anything like that you are just wasting your time.\n\nBTW, all you people that say vote Democrat, keep in mind that throughout history Democrats have gotten us into more wars than Republicans.  Even this war is a result of the inactions taken by a Democrat (Clinton).  So don't blame this entirely on Bush.
383225
WOW... a Republican that actually knows some issues... it's like a rare white whale....\nI think a great number of people on both sides are fairly ignorant of the issues... \nI'll go over some of mine about Bush... many I've not heard anyone else talk about that much..\n\n1. Osama... he's a much bigger threat than anyone out there Iraq, Iran, whoever... he actually attacked us, unlike the others and now Bush just lets Pakistan take care of him... Pakistan... come on...\n\n2. Ports... what in the world... the UAE had more to do with 9-11 than Iraq, per 9-11 report, and we're giving them our ports and invading Iraq... that's just stupid and even the Republican congress knew it...\n\n3. Harriet Meyers... come on... you run on anti-abortion and then you nomninate a wild care like this.... I would be pissed if I voted for you... again the Republican congress basically made him change...\n\n4. Iraq - is there an exit stratagy...or a stratagy at all... it seems like there isn't... retired generals say there isn't... don't do something if you don't know how to get out of it... \n\n5. Domestic spying with no supervision... come on... no goverment agency should have any power without supervision... that's just asking for trouble... and how reluctant they are to talk about it... fishy... I don't want names... just maybe numbers... anything... any idea...\n\n6. CIA leak... if it happened, which apparently it did, it's wrong... whoever is responsible... no excuse... you won't let us have the domestic spying records due to "national security" but you give out CIA opperatives names like candy on Halloween? it's wrong... and somebody had to leak it...\n\nEDIT:... see... you at least have a head on your shoulders... I'll give you that... and granted, no President is perfect... \n\nThe one major issue I disagree with you on is Osama.... that's what everyone said (oh he's not that important, that's why Bush and Clinton never acted) pre-9-11 and look what happened... I feel like leaving him alone could set us up for another attack and I think he is the glue that holds it together... he secures millions in funds from his sources he has in Saudi Arabia and around the middle east... he is the mouth peice... he is the hero... you hit him, it's hugely demoralizing to terror everywhere I think... he's the hero of all terrorist... it wouldnt' be the end of terrror, but I think it would go a long way... \nJust my opinion... \nI think I also want to get him back... I want his head... for 3,000 or so U.S. deaths on U.S. soil... I think we all should want his head... and I think it should be first on the list...
621398
I'm a Republican.  George Bush is a moron.  The man doesn't have a brain in his head, and he got us into this war for absolutely no reason at all.  He's a disgrace.
888315
The Republican Party held unchecked power for six years - and held the house and the senate for most of the last 12. Anyone who questioned the wisodm of this misadventure was labeled a coward or a traitor (usualy by chicken-hawks with radio or TV mikes in front of them)\n\nBush bleated "Stay the Course Stay the Course" until the day after the mid-terms - despite 2700 dead.  The same day he finally fired Rumsfeld despite stating he would not do so.\n\nYet somehow we are supposed to believe the Democrats are responsible for this disaster? \n\nWhen is the party of personal responsibility going to accept some?\n\nI am a vet, and I never supported the Iraq War. If I did support the war I would be back in either the Army of the Air Force and not hiding out in suburbia letting someone else fight while exploiting the sentiments of a soldier who has been royally hosed by the government he serves to pump up ratings for my radio show.
934543
how can you say its only the republicans fault if you truly are from the military.  You above any should know that it is the liberal agenda to put our fighting men and women in a spot their are unable to get out of.  Only a liberal would support our military fighting for our freedom and then attempt to try them in court for doing their job.  Only the liberal agenda would try to give a terrorist the same rights the American people have under our constitution.  Only the Liberal agenda would try to guise the people of this country into thinking our military are cold blooded killers (see jack murtha).  I agree the rep could have done a better job but it is the liberal agenda that has taken our ability to wage war effectively, and has weakened the most powerful and persuasive military in the world into nothing but police activists.\n\nedit: thanks for clarifying.  on that I agree he is lacking in some areas.  But I just look at it as thank god it was him and not the military back stabber John Kerry.  As you also should know a man can only do so much and Just like Hitler when you fight battles on more than one front you are bound to loose one and his domestic policy is defiantly where he is loosing.
491793
Republicans had to have something to take our minds off what they were fixing to do to the price of oil. As for the war, I can not understand how you can win a war that you can not fight. We hold off for fear of what might happen to women and children. Who cared about our women and children when 9/11 came to our country. Turn the military LOSE and let them get finished and come on home. At the same time you will make an example for that other brain dead idiot that keeps running his mouth!
411128
No, you're not the only Republican on Yahoo Answers, message boards or any other Yahoo services. But I haven't considered myself a Republican in quite a while, though. I tend to lead towards their direction on some issues(foreign policy, trasnportation, etc.), and the Democrats on others(equality for minorities). I lost my faith with the GOP in the 1990's with too much immigrant-bashing and 1930's-style isolation in the face of the Serbain genocide in the Balkans.\n\nToo often on Yahoo, I see Democrats, Liberals, Socialists, and yes even Communists, insisting that all the problems of the world are caused by America, Republicans, and/or Bush, when the facts prove otherwise. In their collective fantasy world, all Republicans are either rich CEO's who want to exploit the poor and see our foreign policy as a means of doing so, or they're uneduated poor white trash who live in trailer parks in the south, married their sisters or cousins, get all their ideas about the world from Rush Limbaugh and/or the Fox News Channel, and spend their nights in Ku Klux Klan cross-burnings. To them, Republicans only attack Michael Moore because he's fat, Saddam Hussein wasn't a sponsor of terrorism and didn't have a WMD program(except the one they think they can blame on Reagan), simply because he wasn't involved in the 9/11 attacks, and we're only attacked Iraq for oil, and/or because Bush simply wanted revenge for trying to assasinate his father, or wosre, simply because the nation is run by "brown people." They also believe that just because the news media hasn't covered our troops in Afghanistan as much, that Bush somehow forgot about going after Osama Bin Laden. In their twisted view, complaining about Clinton's sexual misconduct is worse than allowing some Middle East zealots or lingering Commie thugs to cause more bloodshed in the world. According to their party line, our troops are being killed simply because the Iraqi people are resisting the occupation(which was just as much of a lie in Indochina), not because they want to kill people for not being from THEIR dominion of Islam, or because they want to stop those who want to help the Iraqi people recover from Saddam's former oppressive regime and our bombing the country to take it down. And of course, if we don't buy their idiotic 9/11 conspiracy theories, the rest of us are all blind Bush-sheep and neo-fascist tools of PNAC(People for a New American Century) -- they REALLY love to exacerbate PNAC as some kind of threat.
763797
Republicans have a real problem here - they can't afford to let Kerry run his mouth uncontested, but they are skating on thin ice concerning Iraq with the nearing election. I would not want to be in a position trying to justify our being there (even though I feel that we need to stay at this point). Politicians are just slinging mud - when the overspray of mud hit the voters in the eye, the election can be affected drastically. Republicans need to be mindful of the shaky ground that they are on and proceed cautiously.
946941
I would have thoroughly explained my case for the war, aggressively gone on the offense against the media, false allegations, treasonous activities, listened to my speech coaches, and made sure that my party was more cohesive and focused on the mission.\n\nYour #9 is flawed because Nagin and the state Governer passed the blame to Bush.  And  Nagin became elected again.  The man is a coward without any leadership abilities.  He was the authority to begin evacuations.  When he found his voice, he just whined.  He is also in the position to rebuild.  Has he completed this yet?  Is he still blaming Bush?  The governor had the jurisdiction to ask the federal government for assistance.  The governor froze.  She whined.  She blamed.  Local government failed your state's misplaced residents.  Blamining Bush rings hollow when you review the facts.\n\nI agree with your #s 1,2,6, and 8.  Thanks for laying them out.  I especially like your #6.\n\n#7 - with or against:  That statement was directed towards nations of the world.  Check the transcript.  It was the speech addressed to congress.  Many people in the US hate America.  It comes to no surprise that they took affront to Bush's stand.