Do u think time travel is possible?
922481
Yes, it is very possible. If I had told people about my time travel experience, they would call me a retard. In year 2003 or 2004, I don't remember which year it was, I had kind of like the time travel experience reliving the same day. The same exact things happened to me in two straight days. It was the most weired experience I have ever had in my life. Yeah, reliving the same day.
558181
I haven't.But.......\n\nTime travel has been a popular science-fiction theme since H. G. Wells wrote his celebrated novel The Time Machine in 1895. But can it really be done? Is it possible to build a machine that would transport a human being into the past or future? \nFor decades, time travel lay beyond the fringe of respectable science. In recent years, however, the topic has become something of a cottage industry among theoretical physicists. The motivation has been partly recreational-time travel is fun to think about. But this research has a serious side, too. Understanding the relation between cause and effect is a key part of attempts to construct a unified theory of physics. If unrestricted time travel were possible, even in principle, the nature of such a unified theory could be drastically affected....
1054614
Time travel is very possible. You are travelling in time right now, but just at a slow pace.  If you move a lot faster than someone else you will be travelling in time slower than they are.  But if you travel at 95% of the speed of light for 10 years (relative to you), you'd have travelled 11 and a half years relative to someone who is not travelling with you!  This is due to a phenomenom called Time Dilation and is part of Einstein's Theory of relativity.  \n\nYou could say you have travelled 1 and a half years in the future over 10 years.  If you travel even closer to the speed of light for the same amount of time you would have travelled even further into the future.  The equation for time dilation is T=T(0)/(sqaure root of(1-(v/c)^2)).  Where T is the time according to someone staying still, T(0) is the time according to you, v is the speed you are travelling, and c is the speed of light.\n\nTravelling back in time is not yet proven to be feasible but it is thought, by many major scientists believe it would involve bending the universe (which may or may not be possible depending on the type of universe we have) or travelling to a parrallel universe, which would really on have the affect of time travel.\n\nOne major flaw of all these is that returning to the time of your original place is impossible or hard to do.
128584
Yes. Its absolutely possible
823216
Yes!\n\nWell, in theory, at least.\n\nThe "Time Machine" would require the existence of a worm hole - something that scientists believe may exist in theory. Sadly, of course, we haven't actually found one yet, so this is all pie-in-the-sky, but if we *did* find a worm hole, then it's dead easy! (Sort of.)\n\nHere's how we do it.....\n\nFirst, find your worm hole.\n\nSecond, drag one end of the worm hole across space until it is next to the other end.\n\nThird, drag the end of the worm hole round and round the other end, at a speed as close to the speed of light as you can.\n\nNow, as we all know (don't we?) time travels more slowly for a moving clock. (Actually, this has been proved to be true, but that's something for another question - ask and I'll tell you how they proved it.) So, since time is travelling more slowly for the end of the worm hole that you're dragging around it will slip into the past relative to the end that isn't moving.\n\nLastly, simply jump in the end that you've been dragging around and you'll appear out the other end in the future. Then do it again and appear even further in the future. Repeat until you are as far into the future as you want to be.\n\nOnce you've got bored with the future (as if!) just go around the other way and you'll go back in time until you arrive back at the time you started.\n\nYou can't use it to go back into the past though, because you'll simply return to a time before you made your time machine i.e. before you dragged the other end across space.\n\nSee? It's easy! LOL
1144162
Actually, the current theory on time travel is that the furthest back into the past you can travel with a time machine is to the point that the time machine was created.\n\nAccording to this theory, to travel back into the past, you would need to create two worm holes.  One wormhole would exist at the time that you turn on the machine and the other worm hole would be put somewhere to 'age'.  At some time in the future, something could be put into the wormhole in the future and it would come out in the past.
258081
Time travel is pretty much a sure thing, at least to the past.  Tiny little wormholes pop up everywhere all the time.  If one were able to be captured, and then expanded to fit a person through (say with antigravity from the casimir effect or a lazer) a time machine could be made.  Now there are a couple of hoops to jump through of course.  Wormholes have TREMENDOUS pressure, they pretty much crush matter to a single point (called a singularity), so you would have to find a way to survive the trip.  Now, the wormhole has a beggining and an end, two sides like a tunnel.  Now, very large and very dense objects tend to slow down time, so does traveling very fast.  Drag one side of the wormhole next to something VERY dense, like say, a pulsar.  Leave it close to the pulsar and then it will experience time differently than the other side of the wormhole.  Leave it there until there is a time differential between the two that you are satisfied with (like say a year or whatever), and then drag it back right next to the other end of the tunnel.  Now you have two holes in space/time in reletively the same place, but if you walk through one side, you will come out right next to it, but in a different time, dictated by that time differential that you created.\n\nThere are of course paradoxed assciated with this.  One is the famous killing your mother paradox.  If you go back in time and kill your mother, you will not exist.  BUT, if you do not exist you could not have killed your mother and therefore you DO exist and you kill her etc etc etc.  How about a scientist which goes to the future a couple of years, opens up a scientific journal, takes quick notes of a new theory, and goes back to his time and gives the info to one of his students.  This studen then works a few years perfecting the theory and has it published.  This just so happens to be the journal that the scientist had read.  Where did the information come from in the first place, did it just appear out of nowhere?  There are lots of logical problems with this, but by the time we manage to develop the technology necessary to do all this we'll probably have figured it all out.
312777
Yes, there's still research going on. And yes, the theory still holds that if we could find a wormhole and create enough anti-matter to widen and stabilise it, and then find a way of surving the journey, time travel might be possible.\n\nBottom line, everything that's a theory today will either be proved or disproved somewhere down the line. Some things, like wormhole time travel and single-lifetime interstellar travel are the scientific equivalent of steeplechases - races with big old obstacles in the way. They might seem impossible at the start, but once you start running, you either have to figure out how to leap over the obstacles or fall down at them. But human beings are good at steeplechasing - look at the challenges we overcame between 1899 and 1970 - we couldn't fly when the century began. By the time we were seventy years in, not only had we fought two world wars in the air, we'd successfully landed on the moon. Who knows what we'll achieve by 2070...
848166
I think there is a difference between *seeing* past events--like looking at the 8-minute-old light from the sun--and time travel.  Time travel, as it is portrayed in novels and movies, involves the ability to actually be in the past or future, and I cannot see how that is possible.\n\nTo begin with, imagine going back to your own childhood.  You enter the house where you grew up and have a conversation with the kid you used to be. There you are, in your old kitchen, having a conversation with . . . yourself.  Do you see the probem?  There are TWO of you, the young child that you were and the adult that you are now, both together.  If you cannot accept the possibility of another person, or a billion other people, all of whom are you--just as much you as the person reading this answer--then time travel can't exist.\n\nNow consider a further possibility.  You travel back in time to the kitchen where your great grandfather was a boy.  Maybe that was 100 or 120 years ago.  But this time, instead of having a conversation with the boy version of your great grandfather, you kill him.   He never becomes a father to your grandfather, so your grandfather is never born.  Obviously, neither is your father ever born, nor, of course, you.  But if you were never born, who is it who just killed your great grandfather?  And, while we are at it, how can you be here?\n\nBottom line:  Just as a recording of an old TV news show can tell us what happened last year, light traveling through space may provide us with a record of what went on 8 minutes or 8,000 years ago.  But it is not time travel, which is impossible.\n\nGood luck!!
676857
Assuming time travel is possible, I think such a senario might be possible.  The trouble people have with time paradox lies in the assumption that every thing in the universe shares the same time line.  Why should that be true?  Here's an example:\n\n\n------  X  -------------------  Y  ---------\n\nAbove is our theoretical timeline.  Y represents me, in the "present".  I use my time machine to go back to X, before my grandfather sires my father, and kill him.  Logic dictates that I shouldn't exist.  What I'm suggesting looks like this, instead:\n\n---------------------------  Y  ------------\n                             \n\n---------------------------  X  ------------\n\nX & Y still represent me & my grandfather, but each of us now possess our own separate time line.  Instead of "going back in time", I simply hop off my timeline & onto his.  I am now free to perform my assassination, without consequence to me (beyond the obvious legal ones), as I was not born on this timeline, but my own.  Whether or not I can now return to my own timeline is an entirely different question, however.
1110328
Possible now!\nwe go forward in time 1 day every day.
467276
In theory, the faster you move, the slower time advances for you. If you were to move at a speed approaching the speed of light, you could slow time enough that you could "travel" forward. It isn't really time travel, but whatever works...\n\nAs far as I know, traveling backwards definitely is not possible; time is a construct, something that only exists in one's mind. It is really a rate of change; the change can only occur in the positive direction, so traveling backwards is out.
294584
Time travel at least in the sense of viewing the past events is possible. This can be done with meditation, remote viewing,scrying, Dream work, past life regression, psychic vision or hypnosis. Most people can learn. I have done it and know many others who have also done it. It is also possible to veiw created realities too. Yes psychic veiwing often reveals  things very different from the accepted view. \nFor example,remote viewing of the Crucifition shows around 40 crucifixions on the site at that time rather than three.\nThis is probably historically correct . \n Rather than being confusing this is usualy liberating and has a quality of rightness that was missing from the conventional version. Biblical  historical events are often quite different from taught versions. Some of these psychic perceptions have been confirmed by archeologists and historians.
1186293
I think i read on here somewhare that Albert Einstien said that time travel was impossible but time seeing was a possibility.
1068787
travel into the future is possible by einstein theory as one approaches the speed of light.  \n\nTraveling into the past is a different story though, access would have to be open from the past for this.  There is no way to create a portal to the past, someone from the past would have to create the portal to the future where the future person could pass.  \n\nIt is argued though that this would only open a door to another dimension and another universe independent of our own universe.  If you think about it, the fact that someone could 'travel' to the past is direct evidence that other parallel universes exist.  If you were to travel back into time history and events would inevitably be changed from occurences known to us in the present, therefore you must be in another universe.  \n\nAnother way to see the past is to create a large gravitational force bending space time such as a blackhole, and align it so that the light traveling from where you are would be bent back to a location where you could observe it.  This would be like viewing T.V. though, because you could have no interaction.
386007
yes, and that's why it's impossible to time travel (no going past the speed of light either)
228675
maybe Im crazy but I dont think thats possible