is michael vick improving or what?
918280
No, he is just learning the system and finally feels comfortable so i geuss you may consider that improving but i believe it just took himm some time
601267
overall, Mike is better
822327
He is doing awesome. I dont see him winning Comeback Player of the Year as he was pretty good last year. He certainly deserves votes for the MVP, although I agree he wont win it he should get his due.It is clear that he is Pro-Bowl bound and the Saints sure look smart for signing him. Looks like you will enjoy being in the playoffs thanks to him, after all those years of suffering watching Aaron Brooks I bet it feels good.
57857
The best player in the NFL is by far LaDainian Tomlinson. He can run for a TD,catch a TD and Pass for a TD. It certainly isnt Michael Vick. Vick may be one of the most exciting but that doesnt make him the best. In fact he was one of the worst rated QB's in the league. 25th in the league to be exact.
347650
Warren Moon was 10 times better than both of them....but I would say McNabb is the better QB, although I think Vick is probably more athletic.
869855
Vick is not you guy's problem, how about that offensive line?? How many times does Vick get rushed and Sacked each game?? How about those WR's who can't get open. Or the ones who couldn't catch a cold naked in the North Pole? (see dropped TD pass vs Baltimore). How about the 120+yds the special teams unit gave up? Those are the questions the Media needs to be asking. Not trying to point the finger on the QB! I love the media...when he's great they love him and praise him, when he's not so great they bash him and say he's the problem. Gotta love it!\n\nAnyways I'm a Ravens fan, and was at the game on Sunday, and trust me, it was not his fault.
327648
I think the raiders will improve to about 6 - 10 this year.  It may not be what you want to hear but it is an improvement over their last season.  They will be in some close ball games but I think Aaron Brooks just doesn't consistently make great decisions with where to go with the football.  Brooks will look spectacular at times, and then make a couple bad throws that could cost his team a game.  Also their running backs are serviceable, as long as they don't put the ball on the ground.  Their linebackers and safeties have recently had a problem with wrapping up and are missing open field tackles.  Michael Huff was a good pick, that guy is a solid and safe pick.  The Raiders will work through this year and show improvement, but will still lack quality offensive lineman and some linebacker / safety / cornerback help.  They are moving in the right direction now, but will not have quite enough to make the playoffs just yet.  Now if Aaron Brooks improves in his decision making like Jake Plummer did, and all of their draft picks and free agent acquisitions have career years, then they can...but this is the football equivalent of winning the lottery.
1038600
Based on the system he has and the receivers / te and line he has to work with....you could easily make an argument for Michael Vick.  He's never (even during his probowl season) put up solid qb numbers (he made the probowl ONCE cus of his qb rating due to high td to int ratio) so far as passing yardage and td's are concerned.  \nAtlanta generally wins running the ball, but allowing for that most people are still at a loss to explain or understand why Michael Vick hasn't put up some solid numbers with what he has.\nAtlanta will give up on him within the next two years if he doesn't improve significantly.  I personally think Vick will turn things around soon, but he's running out of time.\n\nI would say Joey Harrington, but he isn't starting as of now....and neither is Boller.  I would also agree with the earlier Alex Smith statement if it wasn't for the fact that Alex Smith just doesn't have the supporting cast that Vick has.
305231
Michael Bennett RB Vikings.....4.13.....Once again proves that speed alone does not equal NFL greatness.  The same will be said of Reggie Bush in a few years.
762183
vick ran a 4.26 or a 4.20\n\n9th pharagraph http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/news/2001/02/24/combine_qbs_ap/
678305
From what i know he is a solid kid 4 star athlete. He was the second best qb coming out of texas this year. I believe his name is jevan snead, he should get a chance to see what he can do now that vince young is gone. Too bad they didnt get my boy Matt Stafford.
786864
michael vick -he is going to get you points passing and running -although he is sporadic at times i would go with the vick
266274
Vick is an exciting player.  I'm not a Falcons fan but I will watch their game if it's on.  That guy can switch into high gear and motor past everyone else on the field.  His passing will probably never be top-notch and his ego may need adjusted some too.  But the man can play.
736838
Interesting question, and I agree. I don't know who Atlanta's back-up QB is but maybe Vick is a lot better than whoever it is and Mora knows he's better off w/Vick.
98951
McNair=better qb but Vick=better scrambler
588105
Vick by faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar!!!
234204
The problem with Vick is that he looks to run the ball instead of throwing it.  He was that way in college, and his first few years in the pros.\n\nLike any professional athlete, he wants to get his respect in the media, so he tried to adapt his style by throwing the ball more often.  The truth is, he just isn't a great drop back QB.  He has all of the tools, but he just hasn't had to do it all that much.\n\nGiven time, he could be a great all around quater back, but as teams learn his tendancies and shut his legs down forcing him to throw, his "stats" aren't going to be very strong.\n\nI live in Atlanta and heard all of the criticism, but the most telling thing of all is his record as a starting quarterback.  I don't know the numbers off of the top of my head, but he wins about 70% of the games he starts.