What is the liberal media trying to hide, why wasn't this news?
914851
Can you please tell me what liberal media you are talking about so I can watch it.  All media is pro bush.  It's funny how people will fixate on a remark but going to war based on a lie doesn't upset anyone, leaking agents names to newspapers by the current administration doesn't get anyone in tizzy, inappropriate behavior by current administration staff isn't that big of a deal.  What will it take for republicans to actually get upset with how the current administration is running the country.
1029312
The question should read What isn't he hiding. I know they tried to hide some illegitimate kids that some republicans had when grinding President Clinton. They are hiding Bin Ladin and all the dirty scheming tricks they can to milk us dry til 2008.
965565
Media is in bed with Liberal agenda, that's no secret. The average American has no idea what a real war is and most do not have th stomach to see one through. They do not want to think about bad things and have "their" petty little lives disturbed by anything hard. They do not want to commit the brain power into researching for themselves to find the truth they would rather listen to the "experts" on CNN, NBC, ABC who's only purpose is to make money and to entertain not to report the truth.
599076
Um, it's because of the liberal media? Yeah, that's the ticket. The damned liberal media (nearly all of which is owned by huge corporations who are anything but liberal) are always trying to skew the facts and figures against our beloved el presidente. \n\nErm, in his defense I can tell you that he has single-handedly wiped out a budget surplus left him by Clinton (that dirty bastard!) and turned it into the worst deficit this country has ever known. Hail to the thief! He's also dragged us into a costly and unwinnable war based on lies and misinformation. God love the man! And best of all, he has essentially defecated on the Constitution, infringing and trodding upon our rights to privacy in the name of the "war on terror." Mein fuhrer! Erm, I mean, my hero?\n\n(So how was that for a defense of our idiot king?)
1067716
I suppose it is ignorance or the lack of understanding of what the majority of Americans want for America. I've never seen a Liberal desire anything for all of America, unless it benefited them personally.  And I've never seen a Liberal seek anything that was morally wholesome and/or correct.\n\nSometimes we do not listen to the truth, because we don't want to hear it. Liberals and Democrats do not want our Conservative Republican President to succeed... (which not only makes our president look bad, but it makes America look bad.)\nand because of this, they bash the president, make up stuff...and spin their time stretching or changing the truth.\n\nMost answers to questions on this site, made by them, are "reportable" because they cannot argue their points without cursing or talking dirty. Very few appear educated, most are miss-informed, and all appear to have tunnel vision. (DESTROY and DISCREDIT the President and Republicans.)\n\nI never hear any positive directions or new ideas to help and support America. Just negativity from the left....\n\nBut then TRUTH is always a challenge to discredit.... maybe they just like a challenge!
489912
The greatest accomplishments of the right-wing conspiracy.  \n\nThe media is not liberal.  The media is irresponsible and sensationalistic.  The conservatives started calling it "liberal" and made "liberal" synonymous with irresponsible.  And they used their pundits like Rush, Hannity, and O'Reilly (the three antichrists that Nostradamus predicted) to push this agenda and it worked.  Now it has radio stations and fox news as it's own propaganda machine.  And they still get away with calling the media "liberal," whenever it suits their purpose.  \n\nThis is how politically savvy these guys are.  And liberals could do nothing to stop them.  And it hurts me to say so because I am a bleeding heart, but it is what it is.  Right-wingers are great manipulators.
1039027
it's called treason. when, in a time of war, the press subverts the government to release battle strategies, it could be called treason! j. edgar hoover would have had them shut down and investigated! the only reason that hasn't happened today is because of leftist liberal scum. these same whiny people who complain about everything in this country, and have no realistic ways to deal with any of it. heads full of utopian idealistic crap, and mouths full of piss and vinegar. thank the liberals that more of our men will die because of the ny times being so enthusiastically  anti-government.\n\nas far as rights to privacy.... we are in a time of war! do any of you remember 9/11 at all?!?!?!?!?   who cares if the fed listens to my conversations? I have nothing to hide!!! if you do, you deserve to get caught! to hell with the rights of the clearly guilty!\n\n"This subversive act to follow the money is another example of the Bush administration"  LOL! and the times isn't following the money with sensational headlines and security information leaks to sell more papers LOL no, not at all\n\nwhat ever happened to patriotism?
979931
Because the liberal media has to play to their liberal audience!!!
961638
The Democrat operative Richard Armitage admitted to being the leaker. Nothing is going to happen to him because no crime was committed.\n\nThe Liberal press did very little coverage of it. That is why you didn`t know.\nThat is also why you see all the posts here of uniformed answers about Scooter Libby who was indited for an unrelated issue and had nothing to do with the outing.
985238
I haven't heard that where did you get your information from, Fox Notnews?
1055478
I am troubled by this as well.  I just turned on the talk-radio station and they said it on the news on there (that chemical weapons were found).  But I didn't see it on tv news.  I am confused about what was really found and why it isn't being reported.  \n\nIt makes me angry that only bad news is reported, not the good news that shows how hard our troops are working over there.
1068089
The story has been reported on various news media. The problem is that the version of story that Fox "news" is running isn't the whole truth. The WMD we went to war for have not been found. We did not go to war to find decades-old chemical weapons that had been buried since the Iran-Iraq War. We were looking for WMD proving an ongoing weapons capability that could pose a threat to world peace, not these aging remnants. President Bush has already accepted the findings in the Duelfer Report dismissing these weapons as irrelevant. (See link below)\n\nMore importantly, we already knew about those weapons and turned the other cheek when they were originally produced. Google "Rumsfeld" "Reagan" and "Saddam Hussein" and you'll learn all about the U.S. support of the Iraqi ruler during the Iran-Iraq War, when we supported one monster (Hussein) in the hopes of defeating another (Khomeini). We knew at that time that Saddam Hussein was using chemical weapons against his enemies and his own people, but we did nothing about it. Or more accurately, we signed a piece of paper saying we disapproved of his use of chemical agents, but we continued cutting deals with him because he was fighting a common enemy. We even sold him some of the chemicals that he used to construct these weapons because he seemed like the lesser of two evils at the time. Ironically, we were therefore partly responsible for creating the monster that he is today.\n\nAs a result, the real reason why the WMD story isn't any bigger is because the Republicans want it just big enough for their conservative supporters to hear it and say to themselves, "They found WMD!" but not so loud that people actually start asking questions about where and how these chemical weapons were manufacture or, more importantly, about who supplied Iraq with the raw materials to make them. That would make Reagan, Rumsefeld, and by extension, the Republican party as a whole look like hypocrites. So it's best to keep the story just large enough for Fox news addicts but not so large that the rest of the world hears about it.\n\nIncidentally, I don't suppose you remember what the liberal response was when Bush originally announced his intention to break international law in order to attack a sovereign nation, claiming that  we "knew" Iraq had WMD? One of the most quoted responses at that time was, "Of course we knew he has WMD! We sold them to him!!!" \n\nOnce again, if you people had only been listening to the liberals in the first place, you'd be so much farther ahead in the game.
1167384
I actually completely disagree that the media is 'liberal'. I've seen too many highly controversial stories reported on PBS The Newshour that are never shown on network news. \n\nI think the old saying 'liberal media' is just another way the rightwing is manipulating us. They WANT us to think that so that we don't believe the real stuff... like I said some of the stories I have seen on PBS news.\n\nI wish ppl would wake up... not saying you.. but ppl in general and begin to think on their own and search for the whole, complete, real story on things.\n\nBTW, loved your comment on my B. Laden question. Some ppl argue with the truth even when it is staring them in the face.\n\nAlso, capitalism has never worked throughout history for the exact reasons we are seeing develop now.
792811
I was almost afraid to look at your link (after the one yesterday).But this one is a good one. Never did the Liberal media let us Know how many of our presidents used this same ability. It was used as a propaganda tool against president Bush. Liberals were  fooled again.
1110358
Good question!  Why wasn't leaking Plame's identity treason?  What happened to the free press, or is it only free if Bush says so?
574244
well I saw the video but why there is no mainstream media doing something about it??
135407
No. This story has gotten out of proportion, just like the Monica Lewinsky story under Bill Clinton.\n\nThe White House is really benefiting by this story though because nobody is talking about Iraq at the moment. It's like they planned for this little story to get out of hand, and stay that way for as long as possible.\n\nI would really like to know about the guns and alcohol issues of this story though.