Hilary and Kerry in 08?
928431
That's precisely who I would WANT the Democrats to put on their ticket!  ; )\n\nBring 'em on!  I think we can take 'em!\n\nEDIT - I am a REPUBLICAN and would WANT to go against those two - VERY beatable!
221272
And get Cheney instead? \n\nNo way. Just wait until 2008, when both will get flushed into the sewers of history.
961072
The election of 2008, they usually start campaigning early next year.
892502
I saw Gore and Kerry's brains in jars on Hilary's mantle...\n\n\nright next to Bill's gonads.\n\n\n\nThey couldn't find her brain...
372642
they're official candidates, I think in 2010 or 2012. It also depends from how EU situation evolves (if a new threaty will be done)
884286
yea man, i agree with you. people are way to quick to judge sometimes. i hate kerry, and i am much aware of the whole situation, and i was LMAO when i seen that banner by the troops.  thank god he made this stupid statement, he will no longer be able to run in 08.
894030
Actually, Bush called the second election a 'clear mandate'.  So, no, I don't see it changing with HIM.  Hoewever, the GOP will hopefully be smarter in 08 when they realize that we still live in a democracy, and you better give us someone we want, or face another humiliating loss.  Just think, the GOP could have nominated Elizabeth Dole in 2000 instead of Bush...imagine how different things would be...
439875
That's debateable. Many people say that if Bill Clinton dies before early 2008, Hillary Clinton will be able to rise to the presidency under the sympathy-factor.\n\nUnder a long term, its inevitable. Who knows how long it will take though.
6596
The next leap year is 2008.
228054
2008 might just be Rudy Giuliani vs Hillary Clinton in what will certainly be dubbed The Battle of New York.\n\nOf the two, Hillary is both more qualified and more terrifying.  Her approach to democracy is to disarm the populous and I can't be sure just how she would handle foreign poilcy.\n\nGiuliani on the other hand is neither qualified, nor would he be likely to really hurt the country.  The lesser of two evils perhaps?\n\nIf I had my choice, I'd want a Libertarian House, a Republican Senate, Hillary in the Office, and Colin Powell as V.P.\n\nI know, it's a pipe dream.  I'll still be looking for a better choice than these two come the big day.  What do you think?
1007955
HILARY IS WAAAAAAAY BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!\n\nLINDSAY IS JUST PLAIN YUCK!!!!
879056
If both beat out all the other Democrats they should run on the same ticket, Obama for President and Clinton for VP. I think Obama is a more charaismatic speaker and though he is still new to government it kinda works in his favor for bringing in change to how things have been run by the long-time career politicians. This fresh prespective and charisma would serve him well for establishing actual diplomatic relations with other countries. Clinton is not as charasmatic and is too engrained with the old-time political leaders.\n\nI think americans are alot closer to the idea of having an african-american president than they are to having a female president. With Clinton as VP, Obama has a better chance of surviving his term(s) in office without being assassinated since anyone wanting shot at him has to ask "Do I really want Hilary Clinton as President?"\n\nUnfortunately the Democratic party has been falling apart since they won the elections to win back the congress. If they don't regroup with a united message (like they were doing pre-election) and get some real things done to change things around the Republicans are going to regain their footing and steal back voters. It would be nice if they got their act back together before for the elections in '08, if they don't Obama & Clinton won't have an easy time of it.
1173502
It would be EXTREMELY intruiging, however, it will most likely not happen.\n\nA true kickback to the greatness of the Clinton Era.
473225
The next presidential election will be in November, 2008.\n\nWho runs will be decided by a series of state primaries starting with the New Hampshire primary, the winter before.
217622
I've been Liberal all my life and really want to see the Democrats take back both the House and Senate as well as the Presidency. However, unless the Democrats get their acts together and move closer to the middle they are destined to be a minority party and looking at another Republican in the White House in 08.  In answer to your question, NO, I do not believe Hilary can win, not because of her sex, but because she, in my opinion, is one of the problems with the Democratic Party. As of now, I think Mark Warner, former Governor of Virginia would be a good bet and a great candidate to take the White House back.
859523
I could easily be wrong, but I don't think Hillary Rodham Clinton is up for re-election at this time, whereas John Kerry is up for re-election. I believe Kerry has gotten more press because he is up for re-election and even more so because he bashed the President and the War in Iraq which is such a hot button issue vs. Rodham Clinton disrespecting Ghandi. I don't think gender has anything to do with it and I think that there are other more sensible explanations for the variance in the way the media has responded to their statements.
89662
I wouldn't worry. Bush and Kerry both have been asked "point-blank" about their membership in S&B during interviews, and they didn't leave :)