govt. job is better or private job?
931490
both if private gives u many opportunities for Ur growth,but no job surety govt. gives job stable no growth.now it depends what u want.
331685
A national corporation does business throughout a country. It can be publicly or privately held. A private company is privately held, not owned by stockholders. There's really no way to compare the two.
353566
From my experience, the difference is that the military is becoming increasingly run by inexperienced political appointees, unqualified civilian employees who cant be fired and unscrupulous contractors. Political appointees with political agendas and no military experience  in particular have been given full reign over many functions that were in the past held open only for actual military people with actual military training. Decisions are made for the wrong reasons by the wrong people - that is the easy answer. The more complex answer which I believe is the more accurate is that other government agencies have been "let in" to impose all sorts of regulations on a structure that should operate essentially independently. Allowing other agencies and contractors such as Department of Interior and GSA to run operations at military bases and installations OFTEN conflicts with military culture and the very basic ideas that are instilled into each service person. They watch as the civilians are allowed to file all sorts of complaints for sexual harassment and mistreatment while they have to keep thier mouths shut or face the reprecussions from fellow soldiers - one slight wrong move and a military career is ended while the civilians can get away with just about anything and never be fired just promoted. They watch as the civilians are paid ten times the pay and do 1/10th the work. They are not allowed to be "real" people but are forced to work with them and take direction from them. I think it is frustration that has caused this situation and fear of opening your mouth because you may be deemed insuborninate. The military wants the best and brightest but then does not allow them to be so - the best paid most complicated positions are given to contractors and unless you really manage to get into a specialty that has a market out of the military (there are not a lot of civilian jobs for infantry) you have no marketable skills - NADA - when you get out.\nAll that said, I wish I had done the three or four years it would have taken to get the benefits that come along with the job - the question is: would it have been worth it to sit and be quiet for that time to get a cheap mortgage while risking being court martialed for speaking my mind?\n\nI just have to add to this due to being called a "dumbass" below by an enlisted Navy person. This I have worked with the military for over 2O years on the consultant side - I have worked directly with DOD HQ, Army, Marines, AF, and Navy. I can say I have far more insight into the inner workings of the Pentagon than most people do and particularly FAR MORE than the front line people such as the name-caller. Most of my work has been at the SEC DEF level but have also worked many years directly with installations all over the country. I have outed many unsrupulous contractors that were defrauding the government and watched retiring LTCs beg for jobs upon retirement that they are never qualified for as there is always a more qualified contractor out there. I have watched as political decisions have made people so mad that they did nto re-enlist SO -I can say without calling you names, that you do not have the insight that I do. My observation comes from a slightly different view than yours - you somehow believed that I was some disgrunteled service person - what a laugh! I am on the other end of the stick. You also misread what I am saying - ready - shoot - aim! Given your job - you do not really have a comprehension of what I am speaking of as you are too low in rank and position to feel or see this pinch yet -not a slam FYI - it is just that you do not see this level of interchange yet - it comes far above your rank and skill type. Military is now run by PC politics - politics  creates problems when it trys to run the military by non-military standards with the intervention of other branches of government. If you want to pursue a career you need to read first and digest -
967590
Private sector definitely.  It is always impossible to deal with any government run facility.  I really do not want health care to be operated in the same way.
1104611
Wait...\n\nThe law mandates that the goverment has to provide you with trained workers?\n\nThe law mandates that the goverment has to provide training for people?\n\nWhat sort of neo-marxian shangrila are you living in dude?  Not only is the goverment not required to provide training to people - the goverment is not required to provide you with applicants.\n\nThey are PEOPLE.  Not cogs to be supplied for your use.\n\nMaybe the reason you are having troubble with hiring is that you have a really crummy attitude towards your employees and no one wants to work for you?  If you are having a lot of turn over - there is a reason why people don't want to work for you.\n\nMaybe the industry standard wages are so far below other industries that it is not worth getting the training and experiance you require for the wages you offer.\n\nThere are LOTS of folks who are unemployed - and looking for a job.  If you are having troubble getting help - there is a reason.  I would recomend that you look at teh lowest common denominator - that is to say - what do all of your crummy employees have in common?
817183
The term "private citizen" usually refers to a person acting as an individual, rather than acting on behalf of some corporation or govt agency.\n\nAs far as the benefits of citizenship, that is a huge broad question, and varies depending on state/province or country.
774313
Have the government provide goods and services that benefit the community that cannot be efficiently/effectively be provided for by the private sector.\n\nExamples:\nnational defense--who wants to have a private army?\nrule of law--enforce contracts, provide rules for orderly economic exchange\ninfrastructure--roads, bridges, dams\n\nand many more!\n\nThe important distinction in my mind is that the public policy implementation must be less expensive than an equivalent service provided for by the private sector.\n\nPeople disagree on how to evaluate public goods and the relative capabilities of government and the private sector.\n\nAnother problem is the statesman/politician distinction.  A statesman will try to influence public policy to do what he/she believes is best for the community.  A  politician merely seeks to gain and exercise power through partisanship and the trading of favors, which inevitably hurts the community.
646266
Well the better paying jobs go to those that can spell. It shows you can think better than the dude that gets to mop out toilets.
780645
Government run insurance, just like government run anything else, is the highest cost for the least benefits - it's the least effecient.\n\nThe purpose of government, in the eyes of the bureaucrats, is to grow itself larger, and make more problems, because if it doesn't do that, the government employees are OUT OF A JOB.  They don't WANT to be out of a job, they don't WANT you to be able to get what you want on your own, or in the private market, because THEY DON'T WANT TO LOSE THEIR JOBS. Which, by the way, provide benefits and compensation better than you can ever find in the private market, because . . . YOU PAY FOR IT.
390986
I think the main difference is the level of education/qualification. I think the best workers are the most high-quaalified
626956
In theory they are in charge of the various departments that make up the government.  Civil Servants do the work, Ministers make the decisions and then respond to the critisism in Parliament and through the media.\n\nIn practise most government ministers are not up to the job and end up wasting billions.  They 'hinder' rather than 'help' the government function.
1034426
Well Government,,, this too heavy word when discussed.... since it cannot be in 1 line or 100 page or book ,, need to understand lot to discuss government...\n\nwell first of Government is running the country and that government is suppported by the ppl... Its public voice to raise or lower gas price, raise or lower taxes, raise or lower mortgage, raise or lower salary rates, raise or lower immigrants....  the difference is which ppl support raise or lower thats what the conceern suppose to be rich or poor ppl goes for what you should know by now...\n\nIn Short....\n\nGovernment for the People\nGovernment by the People\nGovernment to the People
265967
Until government programs came into play (starting with public schools in the 1840's) very few people were actually government employees.  It was in the 1930's under the New Deal that the government became the countries largest employer.\n\nThe only people who should be working for the government are those filling positions outlined by the constitution and their aides and advisors.  Most of the people working for the Government work for agencies (such as welfare departments) which were formed by congress to handle legislation of government programs.  \n\nThe Constitution makes it very clear that all legislation is to be carried out by the elected representatives and senators in congress.  Thus all of the agencies that congress has set up over the last 70 years are unconstitutional and should be dismantled.
1028392
why not if you have passion and wants to do someting for society then civil service is best option
489225
Unfortunately, there is steep competition for the good paying easy jobs, or they aren't good paying, or easy...\n\nThink about working for the government.  Union influence is so strong in some government positions, that you can benefit nearly to the point of corruption.\n\nThe union will defend an employees' laziness, incompetence, and inadequacy as long as possible.  And those types of positions will pay much more than the light workload suggests.\n\nThese jobs provide an enviroment that is wonderful for someone who is actually skilled and works diligently.  Pay is good to great, and the benefits are amazing.
1097651
I think you are asking why government employees pay taxes. It is simple - because they are workers first, government employees second.  In some localities, government employees far outnumber private sector workers. If government employees didn't pay taxes, then the local governments would fail.
783601
Good Q Muslimah\nWell group work is much better than individuals. Because they have the time to plan things and can achieve things better, than individual donation.\nSo, if you have an institute whom you trust that's well and good or otherwise you can do it your self, on the other hand taking care of continuous project better than scattered things which are of short duration even when the project is smaller than the interrupted one.