What are 5 adaptations for jaguars?
931001
sharp teeth and claws, \nretractable claws\nflexible spine, \nmuscles for strength and agility, \neyes which see well at night\nCamouflaged fur
852881
1.) Confidence\n2.) Skin\n3.) Butt\n4.) Legs\n5.) Hair
266328
Hey try this site from the BBC. It might be a little too in depth for you but the first page is a good introduction and page 5 gives a good example on how horses have evolved.\n\nhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/biology/variationandinheritance/3evolutionrev2.shtml
35811
1) Genetic variation among members of a population\n2) Inheritance of characteristics (or variations)\n3) Natural selection (survival of the fittest)\n4) Time
867754
The mane is the most prominent physical feature. It is a mistake to think it is armor, though. Lions attack the rear flanks; from side/behind. It is posited that the mane is a sexual selection marker. Female lions mate preferentially with the best maned male lions; when they do have assortive choice.
604807
In regards to what? Blood? Sex typing? Genes? Cars? You need to be more specific!!
920666
They adapt to their surroundings... where they live, the animals around them, the plantlife, the food they eat, the climate, etc.\n\nHere is a bunch of info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panda_bear . You can find the specific details to each thing I listed.
1129927
Cheetah, they can run 60 mph. (on land)\nPeregrine falcon, it can fly up 100-200 mph (in the air) \nBaleen Whale, it can swim up to 30 mph (in water)
110739
They have adapted to their environment.
913482
Felines (cats and lions)\nCanines (wolves, coyotes, dingos, African wild dogs)\nVampire bats\nkiller whales\n\ncertain birds such as\neagles\nhawks\nkites\nbuteos
582481
Theyhave leaves.\n\nTheyhave trunks.\n\nThey grow in the ground.\n\nThey need water to live.\n\nThey photosynthesise.\n\nThey live only on the planet Earth\n\nHow many characteristics do you want listed?
322211
Yes of course - excellent set of claws (retractable, regrowable), super fit body (extra strong muscles, fur to prevent skin injuries while climbing, well-rehearsed daily exercise routine), in-built fall-on-their-feet technique, excellent attitude (they like to be on heights and observe the world from above).
891318
Here are a few names- Puma, Cougar, Mountain Lion, Felis concolor, leon, gato monte(cat of the mountain), cuguacuarana, black jaguar.
882423
evolution,\n\nwe use finger nails to tear, pierce things, makes it easy to open oranges, onions\n\nwe dont use toes for anything
496538
Predation: lion and gazzeles\nparasitism:humans and tape worms. \nhope i helped!
315514
Interesting! You've already gotten some good answers, but I'll add my two cents.\nI think that, more than being related specifically to food-habits, this trait is related to habitat and overall habitus (which includes not only food type but also food consecution mechanisms, locomotor type and other characteristics of habitat use). And of course, to evolutionary history. All lineages have adaptations and constraints of their own.\nAs a basic consideration, most animals that live in terrestrial habitats move in a mostly 2-dimensional world. Flying and climbing animals are the exception, as well as those that may expect predators to come from above. Aquatic environments, on the other hand, are always very much 3-dimensional.\n\nIf we consider vertebrates (which I guess it's what your question was aiming at), most have eyes placed more or less laterally on the head, ensuring an extensive vision field with some (small) binocular central area. Of course, the tradeoff for lateralised eyes is that reduced superimposition of both eyes' fields, thus lesser binocular vision. In the same manner, frontal eyes reduce the total field of vision.\nA (very partial) list of terrestrial vertebrates with frontal eyes and/or enhanced stereopsis (binocular vision):\n\n-Plethodontid salamanders.\n-Chameleons, geckoes, varanids (Komodo dragons), and many arboreal snakes, among reptiles.\n- Strigiformes (owls) and Falconiformes (eagles, hawks...), but also the kakapo, a nocturnal Australian parrot, and the frogmouths (Caprimulgiformes Podargidae). \n-Many generalized marsupials such as opossums; primates and felids.\n\nNot all these animals are predators, and there are several predators with lateral eyes and mostly monocular vision. \nSo, in my opinion, the main factor is not so much what you eat, but how you get it and where you usually move.\n \nFor example, let's take the case of mammals. The earliest known fossils seem to have had nocturnal habits and partially frontal eyes, such as those seen today in opossums. From there, I can visualize different evolutionary paths tending to more laterally placed eyes in animals that have to avoid predators (such as many herbivores - e.g. hoofed mammals- , insectivores or omnivores), and more frontally placed eyes in mammals that require good 3-D vision, be it hunters (as felids) or species that move in a 3-D environment (primates), and/or have nocturnal activity. \n\nOther vertebrate groups have different evolutionary paths and adaptive histories. For instance, the eyes of all birds are extremely large in comparison with other vertebrates, with very wide vision fields; and all birds have binocular vision to some extent. Only specialized predator birds have frontal eyes, but I guess that all birds use their enlarged cerebellum to calculate distances on the basis of the 20-30º binocular field. \n\nAquatic fish-like vertebrates privilege wider vision angles, but there are fish with good binocular vision, such as the hammerhead sharks and also many deep-sea bony fish species. In the case of the first ones, it could be a predator specialization, whereas in the latter case it could be related to vision in low-light environments.\n\nArthropods have a different system altogether, and I think their adaptations and constraints merit a separate discussion (what an elegant way of avoiding it!). \n\nSo, although we like to identify patterns that allow us better understanding of the biological world, I don't think there is a direct relationship with a single factor. The list of possible factors influencing vision type includes:\n- phylogenetic history (including previous adaptations and constraints)\n- locomotor habit (running, flying, climbing)\n- feeding habit (including type of food and ways of searching for it)\n- diurnal/nocturnal activity\n\nI'm sure I'm leaving important things out... I'm not even sure if this all makes sense!\n\n-----------\nUpdate: Gianguru, you're amazing.
823746
1. Unicellular (some aggregates exist, but there is no specialization of cells)\n\n2. convergent evolution (advantage of certain forms for certain function)\n\n3. expansion of local blood vessels (numerous factors trigger the blood vessels to expand and become leaky, allowing immune cells access to the tissue)