which country you think is threatening world peace?
918556
The United States and Britain!\nAnd here is the reason for it since the first World War!\n\nhttp://www.thelastoutpost.com/site/1330/default.aspx
820795
as per the recent poll conducted by the guardian news paper, bush outranked the presidents of Iran and north Korea who are regarded as danger to world peace. the poll was conducted in Canada, Israel, the UK and the USA and in some countries he was second to osama. the peace loving , democratic people of the USA sent signals to the world that they do not approve bush's policy in Iraq. the number of civilians killed is not 150000 but more than 600000 and all third world countries must unite and denounce bush's policy in Iraq and bring pressure on the UN to establish an international tribune for the trial of bush for war crimes in Iraq.
1023479
US, England, France, Israel, Iran, N.Korea, Pakistan, India, China, Russia, and possibly Australia.
627334
Sounds like Iran . Planning to invade it , are you ?
211474
Iran, already a foregone conclusion, we're on a collision course. A nuclear Iran will be up there right along with the coming of Hitler and the Bolshevik Revolution.  We're in for a pretty rough ride, are u prepared?
1155674
I have asked the question, "What does a world at peace look like to you?"  The answers were very discouraging.  I find that the problem lies in the many different definitions of what world peace is and who would make the decisions about what is and is not allowed in that peaceful world.  Some people's and culture's peace is another's worst nightmare.\n\nThe answer that said it best was that Mars, in its barrenness and lifelessness is the best example of a world at peace.
621720
Yes, Israel is a threat to its neighbours and worst of all to itself. The power Israel holds now is based on the support it gets from the US and the spineless UK, but these countries' influence is on the wane, look at events in South America, and the Israeli government will get isolated further. This isolation, I believe, will result in desperation from the Israeli government which might result in some "pre-emptive strikes" from them that would send the region deeper into conflict.
645601
Maybe I can help here. If western democracies have nuclear weapons, that's a good thing and helps towards world peace and stability. If anybody else has them, obviously that's a very bad thing and leads towards armed conflict and Armageddon. Except for Israel, naturally.\nI hope this has cleared up a difficult area of international geo-politics.
742671
Probably Israel because Israel is closer.
1016666
US, England, China, India, Russia, possibly Israel (they aren't saying and we don't know).  Probably others.  North Korea?  Anyone's guess.
281631
Iran, by far.\n\nIn the hands of people who are "willing" to die for their loose and weak "principles", nuclear technology has NO place.\n\nThey have already threatoned the U.S. because of the potential sanctions.  And you are asking this question?\n\nIsreal has shown its constraint having owned the technology, so history is your answer.
627873
This is an easy one:  Kuwait.\n\nKuwait has, without exception, shown itself as a trustworthy and loyal friend to the U.S.\n\nSaudi Arabia was playing both sides of the fence, but recently they have reversed this policy.  They appear to be firmly on our side, but Kuwait has, by far, the longer track record.\n\nEgypt is not a real friend.  Their government may help us on occasion, but mainly they just like the billions in aid we give them every year.  The average Egyptian hates the U.S.\n\nIronically, Libya may turn out to be a strong ally soon.  They have renounced their WMD programs, and may intervene on our behalf with Iran and North Korea.
1170544
Russia, China, Iraq, Iran,maybe Pakistan, & North Korea. Mostely communist countries
393252
Hows about i start the ball rolling by saying. Iran,Iraq,Syria,Palestine, \nBut if i did say those countries i would be lie'ing its not the countries.\nits the Fanatical brainwashed Religious nutcases that inhabit these countries.that are the cause of so much hate and violence.
334152
I'd worry about Iran first.  They will have nukes and they are crazy.\n\nDon't get me wrong, what China does is not right, but if we wanted to wage war against oppression, there is a looooonngg list of countries around the world we have to deal with.  China is only the largest of the bunch.  It is also the dumbest one to offend.  You don't want to rattle the cage of a sleeping dragon of a billion people.  Our economies are so inexorably linked as well, it'd be very, very bad for our economy if we were to hurt our ties with them.\n\nChina is also unique in the sense that they were essentially regressing both socially, economically, and technologically during the Mao years.  That's the better half of a century where one of the largest countries in the world sits still while the rest of the world is moving forward at breakneck speed. Now, they must, in their eyes at whatever cost, modernize to catch up for the last fifty years of stagnation.\n\nStill, we can increase indirect pressures on them, and force our businesses to be more stringent in deals with the Chinese.  However, we can only do so little. Doing good just doesn't seem as righteous when it ends up biting you in the rear with a ton more bad.
796645
China but not because of military reasons but they will soon control the entire world and I'm not sure where we will stand in it anymore, if we will be standing at all.\n\nThis is possibly the last chance we have to get our own economic machine running again but I believe we are on the verge of digging our own graves.
633737
I'd have to say the U.K., although Israel is a good ally too. Unfortunately, the Iraq war hasn't made us too popular.