Was Clinton a better president than Bush Jnr.?
913039
bush Jr is disliked by most of the people in the world. he second to ladden in some countries as per polls done by the guardian news papers. except UK, there is no friend to the USA .he is considered as danger to world peace even in countries like Israel and the UK.but it was not so in the case of Clinton.he did not take a brutal decision like invading Iraq without valid reason and caused for the deaths of  more than 600000 iraqis.
178893
Hell if I know, but there's been worse presidents in history than Bush, as I'm sure we'll have more in the future that will make Bush look like an angel. \nI think people just like to focus on the hear and now rather than the bigger picture of things. \nPersonally, I'd perfer Bush over Clinton...but that's just me.
38671
of course ahmadinejad is so better than bush \nanybody know this \nahmadinejad is honest and i think bush is a big lier\nbut never allow policy !!!!!!
73986
Bush is a fairly good president, particulary compared to clinton...
792473
HELL YES!!!  \n\nWhat planet are these people living on who claim that Bush has improved the economy?  The economy began taking a turn for the worse with Bush's first tax cuts for the wealthy.  We've been on a downward spiral ever since.  The economy was booming while Clinton was in office.\n\nThen again, maybe I'm mistaken and the moon really has turned to cheese.
621311
See, that's what I'm saying.  Clinton was nearly impeached for getting head, and Bush has done so so so much worse.  I wish he could get impeached.  We should find out how to get it started!
400276
whose against Clinton.  I love clinton in a political way of course.  If you could love a person in a political way.  Clinton tbanks for caring about every American even the conservatives.  Unlike Bush.
76894
Definitely Clinton.  During the Clinton years our economy was great (imagine operating with a budget surplus rather than deficit!) and he isn't a warmonger.
107341
No! Does everyone not seem to notice that terrorism became large scale when Bush came into power? Nothing like this ever happened when Clinton was in power. I won't deny that Clinton had his faults, but when he it came to international relations, the man was on top of his game. Unless, the US elects a more intelligent and a more capable president, I fear that any actions taken by Bush and the US government will only make things a whole lot worse.
749310
Which president twice elected got better college grades than his opponents?  \n\nGeorge W. Bush\n\nSmarter than Gore and way smarter than Kerry.
615924
Clinton didn't accomplish anything as far as I could tell,\nhe was too busy with his sorted affairs. He couldn't even help Al Gore. He probably hurt him more than helped him. It really doesn't matter about his sex life; people were training over here to fly airplanes into buildings on Clinton's watch. Bush has taken the blame for all his shortcomings.
1010859
Clinton, and not because I hate Bush, but because\n\n1.The economy was better under Clinton\n2.There was less fear/actual terrorist attacks\n3.The country was fairly united\n4.Less division between parties\n5.Better education plan without No Child Left Behind\n6.Working on healthcare problems vs. working on changing the Consitiution\n7.Scandals had to do with sex, not money theft, conspiracy, and wiretapping...\n\nClinton wins, the only place people really hate him for is the affair and that was his private business, in reality almost all Presidents have affairs...
992584
You're going to get so many different answers all based on all sorts of different political views...\nBut for me personally, I don't like everything that Bush has done domestically (and no, I'm not talking about the supposed spying program or any of that rabble) but he has been the best during this time of war.\nAs far as Clinton goes...he commited treason. He sold secrets, used presidental order unconstituionaly...but I have nothing actually against the man, just his policies and his actions that he did as president.\nI am a Conservative Federalist...I am for small federal government and for individual state rule. I believe that almost any issue can be handled by the state in accordance to what the people want. So as of right now, I'm frankly mad at all the toe stepping going on in the federal government. This country was founded as a represenative republic and as of right now, this country is moving to the ideology of a democracy. And don't get me started on the activist courts...lol. \nBut as to your question who is better? I would have to say Bush because of my personal feeling on politics and ideology...but others will say otherwise or the same, all for different reasons. I hope you get the reaction you were hoping for.
500195
bush stole that, Gore would have been a MUCH better president in every way, HANDS DOWN!
7217
Weather Observer, your pure genious! Yeah Clinton did do something that is impeachable... He lied to everyone in the world. Clinton wasn't impeached because of what he did with Monica, but more of that he lied to us. He probably wouldn't have gotten impeached if he came out and told the truth and apologized, and cleaned up his act. President Bush has done nothing wrong, You just want him impeached because you don't share the same morals, and you are agaisnt "the war on terror" (how in the world could someone be agaisnt a war on terror?!?!). Those reasons are not probable causes for impeachment.
747812
You have Bush confused with Clinton. \n\nDeath Trail Clinton.
657325
Anyone would be better then any Bush. But I prefer Hillary, she is a stong, intelligent woman not afraid to stand up for what is right. She would have one of the best advisers in the world in her husband, he is the last president to be elected legally and also the most successful in 40 years.