Identify the underlined pronouns as personal, reflexive, or intensive.?
923286
Personal pronoun, for sure.
394956
C is correct. "between" is a preposition and begins a prepositional phrase which ends with a noun or pronoun called the object of the preposition. Therefore, the objective case (form) of the personal pronoun (me, him, her, us, them) and NOT the nominative case (form) of the personal pronoun (I, he, she, we, they)follows a prepositon.\n\nI hope this helps you.
575719
Your statement and grammar awnsers that question
454227
Talk softly\nWalk humbly\nEat sensibly\nBreath deeply\nSleep sufficiently\nDress smartly\nAct fearlessly\nWork patiently\nThink truthfully\nBeleive correctly\nBehave decently\nPlan practically\nEarn honestly\nSave regularly\nSpend intelligently\n\n\nThis is my current focus
769169
First Name\nlast Name\nGender\nCity\nState\nZip\nReligion\nIncome Level\nEducation\nAge\nHobbies\nProfession\nSexual Preference\nStatus (Single/Married/Widowed)\nCountry\nNationality\nEthnicity\nEye Color\nHair Color\nFavorite Color\nFavorite Movie\nFavorite Book\nFavorite City\nFavorite Musician/Artist\nFavorite Sport\nAdjectives that describe themselves\nFavorite Activities
614912
W M I\n\nReason:\n\n(H)ow (D)o (A)ny (A)nswerers (B)egin (C)ontemplating (T)he (A)nswer (W)ithout (M)ore (I)nformation?
356835
Its a noun or a verb, transitive verb or intransitive verb, depending on context.
1091038
Yes, 'name' is the object of the preposition 'in'. \n\n"What's" is the contraction of "What is".\n\n'What' is a Interrogative Pronoun, \n\n'is' is a verb (present singular of the irregular verb "to be") \n\n'in' is a preposition.\n\n'a' is an adjective (but classified along with 'an' and 'the' as article) and \n\n'name' is a noun.
62172
B\n\nIf you would use the word "Us" then it should be "Me".\nIf you would use the word "We" then it should be "I".\n\nLorna and I went to school. We went to school.\nHe gave the book to us. He gave the book to Lorna and me.\n\nSo the correct form is: "The basketball bounced right between Lorna and me."\n\nItself, ourselves, myself refer to reflexive action. Reflexive action is done by and to the same person or group.\n\nI gave myself a shampoo. We gave ourselves the day off.
524900
english\nspanish\nfrench
998142
interrogative. declarative. exclamatory
1156281
his\nher\ntheir\nour\nmy\nyour\nsomebody's\nanybody's\nnobody's\neverybody's
96996
IS:\nVERB: \nThird person singular present indicative of be.\n\nBE:\nVERB: \nFirst and third person singular past indicative was   (wz, wz; wz when unstressed) KEY  , second person singular and plural and first and third person plural past indicative were   (wûr) KEY  , past subjunctive were , past participle been   (bn) KEY  , present participle be·ing   (bng) KEY  , first person singular present indicative am   (m) KEY  , second person singular and plural and first and third person plural present indicative are   (är) KEY  , third person singular present indicative is   (z) KEY  , present subjunctive be \nVERB: \nintr. \n\nTo exist in actuality; have life or reality: I think, therefore I am. \n\nTo occupy a specified position: The food is on the table. \nTo remain in a certain state or situation undisturbed, untouched, or unmolested: Let the children be. \nTo take place; occur: The test was yesterday. \nTo go or come: Have you ever been to Italy? Have you been home recently? \nUsed as a copula in such senses as:\nTo equal in identity: "To be a Christian was to be a Roman" (James Bryce). \nTo have a specified significance: A is excellent, C is passing. Let n be the unknown quantity. \nTo belong to a specified class or group: The human being is a primate. \nTo have or show a specified quality or characteristic: She is witty. All humans are mortal. \nTo seem to consist or be made of: The yard is all snow. He is all bluff and no bite. \nTo belong; befall: Peace be unto you. Woe is me. \nVERB: \naux. \n\nUsed with the past participle of a transitive verb to form the passive voice: The mayoral election is held annually. \nUsed with the present participle of a verb to express a continuing action: We are working to improve housing conditions. \nUsed with the infinitive of a verb to express intention, obligation, or future action: She was to call before she left. You are to make the necessary changes. \nArchaic Used with the past participle of certain intransitive verbs to form the perfect tense: "Where be those roses gone which sweetened so our eyes?" (Philip Sidney). \n\n--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\nETYMOLOGY: \nMiddle English ben, from Old English bon; see bheu- in Indo-European roots. See am 1 is , etc. for links to other Indo-European roots \nUsage Note: \nTraditional grammar requires the nominative form of the pronoun in the predicate of the verb be: It is I (not me); That must be they (not them), and so forth. Nearly every speaker of Modern English finds this rule difficult to follow. Even if everyone could follow it, in informal contexts the nominative pronoun often sounds pedantic and even ridiculous, especially when the verb is contracted, as in It's we. But constructions like It is me have been condemned in the classroom and in writing handbooks for so long that there seems little likelihood that they will ever be entirely acceptable in formal writing.·The traditional rule creates additional problems when the pronoun following be also functions as the object of a verb or preposition in a relative clause, as in It is not them/they that we have in mind when we talk about "crime in the streets" nowadays, where the plural pronoun serves as both the predicate of is and the object of have. In this example, 57 percent of the Usage Panel prefers the nominative form they, 33 percent prefer the objective them, and 10 percent accept both versions. Writers can usually revise their sentences to avoid this problem: They are not the ones we have in mind, We have someone else in mind, and so on. See Usage Notes at I 1, we.\nOur Living Language In place of the inflected forms of be, such as is and are, used in Standard English, African American Vernacular English (AAVE) and some varieties of Southern American English may use zero copula or an invariant be, as in He be working, instead of the Standard English He is usually working. As an identifying f
197790
They are:\n\n1. Correct spelling and capitalization: "What"\n\n2. Number-&-Agreement: "What are the three main things...."\n\n3. Diction (word choice): "What are the three main elements/characteristics/tenets" (whichever is best).
585674
I can't believe all these people saying "Mark and I"  !!!  "Mark and me" is correct!\n\nSimply take "Mark" out of the sentence and see if it sounds right.\n\n"Could you please copy I on these communications?"  It doesn't work!\n\nAnd the first one is correct.  The second sentence uses the reflexive pronoun "myself," which doesn't make any sense.  Could you please copy myself on these communications?  You would not ask somebody to do it, if you were going to do it yourself.
538319
A -> B\nB -> C\n...\nT -> U\nYou (U) -> V\nV -> W\n\nSo, You -> V
28010
11.1. Quick Start\nConcord is agreement in gender, case, number or person between different words that share a reference. For example, if a sentence contains a proper noun "Paul" and somewhat later a pronoun "he," and they refer to the same person, we say that they agree in number (for both are singular) and gender (for both are masculine).\n\nAs speakers or writers of a language we experience concord as a set of rules to learn and follow (and sometimes complain about). As listeners or readers we recognize that concord helps us decode sentences. In this passage\n\nElizabeth Bennet had been obliged, by the scarcity of gentlemen, to sit down for two dances; and during part of that time, Mr Darcy had been standing near enough for her to overhear a conversation between him and Mr Bingley, who came from the dance for a few minutes, to press his friend to join it. \ntwo grammatical rules help us to determine the reference of the pronouns "her," "him" and "his." The first of these is that a pronoun must agree with its antecedent in gender and number; this rule associates "her" with Elizabeth Bennet (rather than Darcy, who would otherwise be a possible antecedent) and prevents our associating "him" or "his" with Elizabeth Bennet. The second is that a pronoun must be associated with the most recent possible antecedent; by this rule we understand "his friend" to mean "Bingley's friend" rather than "Darcy's friend."\n\nWe work out the reference of the pronouns in a passage like the one above without conscious effort. Indeed the Modern English rules of concord are few and relatively simple:\n\nThe subject must agree with its verb in person and number. For most Modern English verbs this simply means that we must remember that a third-person singular subject generally takes a special verb form ending in -s. The verb to be, however, distinguishes all three persons in the present singular (I am, you are, she is) and the second person in the past singular (I was, you were, he was). \nThe pronoun must agree with its antecedent in gender and number. If you speak of a woman named Ruth in one clause and then in the next clause want to refer to her with a pronoun, the pronoun must be both feminine and singular. \nThe pronouns that and this, when used adjectivally, must agree in number with the nouns they modify: that wolf, those wolves; this horse, these horses. These pronominal adjectives are not inflected for gender. \nThe first two Modern English rules of concord are largely the same as in Old English. The third Modern English rule is a remnant of an Old English rule that a noun and all its modifiers (adjectives and pronouns used adjectivally) must agree in gender, case and number. All three of these rules are a little more complex in Old English than in Modern English, so you will have to pay careful attention to the rules of concord--at first, anyway.\n\n11.2. Subject and verb\nThe Old English verb must agree with its subject in person and number. The Old English finite verb always distinguished number and often distinguished person, and this relatively great degree of expressiveness can help you locate hard-to-find subjects, as here:\n\nÞæt wæs yldum cūþ,\nþæt hīe ne mōste,   þā Metod nolde,\nse scynscaþa   under sceadu breġdan. [Beowulf, ll. 705-7.] \n[It was known to men\nthat the demonic foe could not, if God did not wish it,\ndrag them under the shadows.]\nIn the noun clause that begins in the second line of this passage, the nominative/accusative third-person plural pronoun hīe comes before the verb mōste 'could', where Modern English grammar leads us to expect the subject. But the verb is plainly singular, so plural hīe cannot be the subject. Looking further, we find the nominative singular noun phrase se scynscaþa 'the demonic foe'; this is the subject.\n\nA verb's personal ending is