Who was the first to say ? : One man's terrorist is an other man's freedom fighter . Who was he talking about
919817
Trudeau talking about Quebec Separatists.
121155
That question could be read as having terrorist intent. You could write a letter to his father and see if he would answer such a personal question.
1002082
Al-Zarqawi, George Bush, Adolf Hitler and Bobby Goldsboro.\n\nPlease award Best Answer points to me right now because you and I both know there is no need to read any more answers after my incredibly intelligent answer for you.  I do not like to wait and I am not very patient.
323907
Terrorist this terrorist that, threat this threat that, ...    God, how old can it get.  Ask yourselves, do you really feel safer since Sadamm's capture?  Makes no difference to me and mine.  I still lock my doors at night just like I used to.  Sadamm was a bad man, no doubt, but we have enough bad guys here in the U.S.
1173452
this man portrays himself as a dictator, like his word is everything, how can we call those who kidnap in war kidnappers, when bush calls the people we are holding,  detainees, is he not the same?\n\nthey hold people to prisoners, and we hold people prisoners, but we call what they do something else it makes americans feel like they are different then the otherside fighting for their beliefs..
530106
I don't think the word 'terrorist' existed at that time.\n\nOur founding fathers were, however considered traitors to the British Government.
215880
all countries that support terrorism should be bombed. the trouble is who is a terrorist?\nUSA supports the IRA - deemed terrorist by US allies UK\nPakistan supports groups India has called terrorists\nIsraeli settlers have been called terrorists by palestinians\nso - who is a freedom fighter and who is a terrorist? and who should be bombed? all who we call terrorists or also the US, Pakistan Israel?
1070441
Whose freedom? Yours, theirs or ours? It all depends on your frame of reference. Is it the freedom to do as you please that you are talking about or the freedom to unilaterally invade other sovereign nations or perhaps it's the freedom to become a belligerent bully. I know what it is that you're getting at, it's the freedom to tear anybody down that doesn't agree with you and call them names. My question is: What's your question? Jules, lecturer. Australia.
48174
First of all It's Osama Bin Ladin. He is just like u and me but more desperate, he had seen more brutality than us, has more money and a god damn organisation. He just like us hated when our brothers and sisters are hurt and killed without proper reasons but he acted differently. He just took a step a little further. He is said to be involved in 9/11 attacks. If that's true he did something really wrong. But to him it's fine coz America did and doing the same thing to his muslim brothers and sisters. Whatever it is, he shouldn't have done that. Now, there's no difference between him and America.
38555
Define "Terrorist".  Then ask if it would be better to kill all terrorists then 1 innocent person.  I would say yes.  They can come up with an intelligent way to change things instead of violence.  If someone is potentially violent because of nothing but hatred that has been brainwashed into them are they safe for society?\n\nIf you could have killed Hitler and saved many millions of lives, would you?
624846
I have a reference from 1997 that already says it is old:\nhttp://www.pbs.org/newshour/forum/august97/terror01.html\n\nThe fact that numerous sources fail to give the original source of the quote suggests that no-one actually knows when it was first used.
368225
who did it? well it wasnt the butler in the hallway wilh a candlestick. how many different arab leaders are there in U.A.E.?i wouldnt know.however, it had to be a terrorist group of the arab world. look at the names listed they were all arabic.as for the official story, what we read and saw on the tube was as official as it gets.information concerning this tragic day possibly was edited just to be on the safe side. what i mean is that the story probably had more to it than what was said ,but with the turmoil in the world today, the increasing price of oil and fingers pointed at everyone, why say anything to start trouble? personally i dont think our country is the most advanced in defense or technology.our computers are made up of japans experts and as far as i know our defense systems are made with the same technology. i think there a a few small nations in the world that have come a long way as we have but secrets must be kept.hopefully im wrong but,i have read and surfed the web,i had found many items of interest that are questionable.im not a trouble maker and i think any information gotten will be sufficient enough to sustain my curiosity. i served during vietnam and i enlisted and would do it again. this country is my home and i was proud to serve.
297346
Depends on who's defining  the terrorism.The forefathers of the USA were considered terrorists  by the English...
589308
the first man is correct...
217449
Ask, 'Would the other soldier tell me this door leads to freedom?'\n\nIf the answer is yes, then it is the other door. If no, then that is the correct door.\n\nExplanation (sort of): say guard A, by door A (which leads to death), tells the truth and guard B lies; you ask A. B lies, so would tell you yes, A does lead to freedom. So guard A would truthfully tell you that B would say yes. Do you see the logic? I am not brilliant at explaining it, but trust me, it is right!
693176
the answer to this is ONE MANY TERRORIST IS ANOTHER MAN'S FREEDOM FIGHTER  it all makes sense if u think about to the israealies sucide bombers are terrorists and to the plastinians they are freedom fighters trying to get the occupiers out of THEIR homeland.
995694
I don't want to speculate and here is why:  I have had discussions among close friends about potential targets and vulnerabilities, some of which really concern me.  Since this is the internet and we know there are anti-american elements here and likely links to terrorist groups right within this forum I wouldn't want to give them any ideas.  There are some things about which one should remain silent.