Physics wizard........?
915623
There are basically 4 theories of light\n\n01. The Corpuscular Theory of Light\n02. The Wave Theory of Light\n03. The Electromagnetic Theory of Light\n04. The Quantum Theory of Light\n\n\n01. The Corpuscular Theory of Light\n-----------------------------------------------\nNewton proposed this theory that treats light as being composed of tiny particles. We use this theory to describe reflection.   While the theory can explain the primary and secondary rainbows, it cannot explain the supernumerary bow, the corona, or an iridescent cloud.\n\n\n02. The Wave Theory of Light\n---------------------------------------\nProposed by Huygens, this theory describes light as waves that spread out from the source that generates the light.   Each color is a different wavelength. Supernumerary bows are explained by assuming that light is a wave.\n\n\n03. The Electromagnetic Theory of Light\n----------------------------------------------------\nMaxwell's theory describes light as having electric and magnetic properties--electromagnetic waves. It is an improvement over the wave theory in that it explains how light is generated.   Visible light is only one type of electromagnetic wave. This theory is very math intensive.\n\n04. The Quantum Theory of Light\n-------------------------------------------\nThis theory is more mathematical than Maxwell's equations! It is similar to the corpuscular theory of Newton, except that instead of describing light as particles, light is composed of 'packets of energy' or photons. The energy of the photon determines the color \n\nThe dual theory of light says that it has corpuscular as well as wave properties.\n\nThe speed of light is determined as follows\nVelocity = Frequency x Wavelength\n\nTransparent Objects are  those which pass light through them. Opaque objects are those which doesn't pass light through them.  Translucent objects are between them.
190569
Only if you show your work and do not expect them to do the question for you; only to provide hints and guides.\nhttp://www.physicsforums.com
194029
Hi!\nI change my field of study from physics to biophysics but still its a great pleasure to solve a problem in physics if you dont mind.\nWish to see your project.\nBye
1140478
Take a physics class.  It's mostly common sense.
326647
what do you smoke goring ?\n\ni hope to god that you are not a physics student.
607503
Science??????????????????
761342
We did something like this in my physics lab with an Atwood machine.  It was a pully with weights hanging from it.  I can't exactly remember how it worked, but maybe this will inspire you.  We also did something with an air track and these two masses colliding and we'd see which one would go in which diretcion.  You need a nearly frictionless surface, like an air hockey table or ice slab.
438745
try wingfields art of mechanical motion, doubleday i think.
915800
http://www.sciencebuddies.org/mentoring/project_ideas/home_Phys.shtml?gclid=CNDljtrK6IgCFQ7eSgodNw4Ssg\n\nthere are MANY projects available getting more complex as you come to the bottom of the page.
976575
Hi Mark, I will answer your question if you answer mine first.\nWhy are you asking this question, it seems like a lot of people in school are trying to take the easy way out of a physics or math problem.\nWill answer if you are not doing said above!\nCheers, Susie
146531
This site is constructed well and has a high level of detail (up to degree level).\n\n\nhttp://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html
899593
Hello,\n\nIn this link you will have what you need:\n\nhttp://www.bsu.edu/web/fseec/pie/Lessons2/Physics/Potato%20Battery.doc\n\nI believe now will be OK.
936678
Thats sounds like a good idea as you will def need physics at a very good level to do engineering!...;
31825
http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/\n\nThey have open material from courses taught at MIT. I have been able to glean a lot from them.
79420
Hey babygurlgonnaloveonu you have asked what is totally QUESTION NUMBER ONE in physics. It's an exciting question which many teachers secretly don't understand and so their students get this hazy idea and kind of go thru the motions. \n\nWow, it is so basic, that it took a super-genius, I mean way smarter than Einstein, to figure it out. A good old farm boy, astrologer, magician & alchemist, religious fanatic, mathematician and all around kook. Yep. Sir Isaac Newton. You gotta wonder what kind of parents would name their kid "Sir"\n\nWell we all know what a force is, it is a sort of push or pull -- think of it as something that changes or *tries to change* the motion of stuff.\n\nNewton first figured out that if you leave a thing alone, or if the pushes and pulls on it cancel out, then it will sit there like a lump. Like those drivers wearing hats, and like sit there after the light has already turned green two minutes ago. \n\nOr else a thing  will keep moving in the same straight line direction and speed  like those drivers wearing hats who go 40 mph on the expressway with their turn signal blinking on and on. This is known as "THE HAT LAW".\n\nAll was well until he noticed that things move faster in an amount equal to how much you bully them or push them around. Twice the force, twice the fasterness and fasterness (also known as acceleration). This is called the "YOU BIG BULLY LAW".\n\nThen he discovered a fly in the ointment. His HAT and BULLY laws didn't really explain all that much. Something was gumming up this beautiful theory. We call it MASS and it is still an unknown mystery as to what it really is. So we vaguely call it the amount of stuff or matter in a thing. \n\nSo he found out that for a certain force the faster-isity (acceleration) is cut in half if you double the mass. The bully has to push twice as hard to fasterize two little kids. So he was like "I'll just add that in, and all will be cool". The "YOU BIG BULLY LAW" and "THE HAT LAW" totally did it all. Wa ta da babee!\n\nBut then Newton had a road accident. He was gunning his Harley over London bridge at like 250 when a bug  hit him in the mouth and knocked out one of his wooden teeth. He was all "Why am I so in pain?". And the bug as it squooshed said "Help! I'm a bug!"\n\nSo spitting out the splinters of his wooden tooth and the splattered bug, he had this revelation. He realized that because he was moving so fast, and the  bug slowed down so fast, that even a eentsy mass like a bug was like taking a hammer to his tooth. \n\nHe noticed that the force was equal to the mass of the bug times the speed of impact all happening in a brief moment. Since Newton spoke Latin (he  was the love child of Joe Newton and an Italian governess) he wrote "Fastus buggus ina momentum hurtus like crazy." Today we call this "momentum". It is just "mass times speed" or "force times a small moment of time". \n\nAnd he realized that the bug smashed up his tooth, but also that the bug was squashed (like a bug) because they were trading the EXACT same amount of momentum. The force on the tooth by the bug in the moment of time was PRECISELY equal to the  smacko-ing the tooth used to stop the bug dead. \n\nHe said "Hey, like he broke my tooth, but I killed him soooo dead!" He did the math and found that the force of the bug on the tooth was equal to the force of the tooth on the bug! \n\nNo way did the two equal forces cancel, after all, his tooth was hammered to splinters, and the bug was flattened. They were equal and opposite, but since one was on the tooth, and the other force was on the bug they did serious damage! Today we call this the "HELP I'M A BUG" law.\n\nNow our man 'Zack was all set. He wrote down his three laws:\n\nTHE HAT LAW (beeep! beeep! Move it Hat Guy!)\nTHE YOU BIG BULLY LAW (betcha can't kno
735831
Did you put your entire homework assignment on here? I noticed you posted a bunch of science questions just now.\nIf you don't have your textbook handy [you really should be looking up these answers so that you can remember and understand them when you have your test/exam], go to the links below and look them up. The 1st is a down loadable physics textbook. The 2nd has animations of physics.
1025849
Psychic, rather than physics? Don´t.....\n\nBut if you must, start here:\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parapsychology