Was the attempt by Proffessor Walker to rescusitate the1000 year old frozen Viking,proof that you can take a?
919716
I always did like a blue swede- oogah chukka oogah chukka
313126
It is a matter of faith really, I like to believe he actually walked on water but I don't think we will ever know for sure. Still, I think any rsearch on the topic is a complete waste of money and time. After all, it is impossible to try and correct the Bible given faith is not something you can scientifically prove.
648495
We don't know their exact name (and it would have been more than one person) but it would have been approximately 20,000 - 30,000 years ago through a land-bridge across the Bering Sound, from northeastern Siberia into Alaska.\n\nWhat does something not exist until some white guy finds it? How very narrow minded and racist!
912408
well... technically the vikings did... a guy named lief ericson then came amerigo vespucci and lastly and the one that got the credit: Christopher Columbus
726808
Pictures are not "proof" nor are words written by humans in a book called the Bible. \n\nPeople have made pictures of many things which were not real - like the Star Trek television series which you mentioned. To many of us they are all stories meant to entertain or to educate - but they are not necessarily "documentary" in nature. \n\nAs far as I'm concerned you can believe whatever it is that you wish, but please do not be offended if the rest of the world doesn't decide to remain rooted in ignorance with you. \n\nThe images of the "feathered serpent" which you refer to, are just as probable to be something as subjective as an artists' conception of a kind of giant snake called an Anaconda. It could have been something that the artist heard about second hand from a traveller. It may have been a composite creature like the sphinx. If it was a description of an Anaconda it would have seemed a terrifyingly powerful and godlike being, just as the Jaguar and other totemic spirit creatures were often viewed in the context of being gods or at least superior to humans, by certain Central American cultures of antiquity. \n\nThese things need not have been part of the daily life of the people who carved it - they were just as likely to have been images which were symbolic of religious ideals and concepts or metaphores - Doesn't your own religion use "parables" to teach certain ideas? \n\nThe entire body of evidence resulting from paleontology, geology and other sciences and the quite consistent technology by which fossils and other forensic evidence are used to determine the dates when the earth was once inhabited by creatures which are now extinct, is not going to be invalidated simply because -you- personally find it to difficult to understand. \n\nWhether -you- believe it or not, really doesn't matter. The evidence fits the theory - in fact the theories are refined and improved a bit more each time a new discovery is made, as thousands of tiny observed details are added to the body of knowlege we call a science. In fact, some of the discoveries were made based on predictions that fit the climatic records that we have independently aquired from geological records produced from independent studies that were conducted elsewhere on the earth. The discoveries from physics and mathematics that help us to date these things, also helps us to predict where the finds should be - so unless there is some secret global conspiracy of all scientists and those who accept reason instead of faith, to falsify the evidence just so we can fool -you- It seems like we are the ones who might be genuinely seeking the truth here.\n\nIn fact it seems pretty likely that the real truth is that the Bible just isn't a comprehensive reference text to all knowledge about everything in the objective world. Especially when it comes to determining the history of the planet. I'm not saying the Bible doesn't have a purpose or value just that it's not as accurate or useful source of data when it comes to details about earths prehistory as observing the rate at which alluvial sediments of certain sizes and granularity and porousity are deposited and calculating from that how long it would take to pile up millions of tons of soil and sand and clays and turn them into the natural formations where we have dicovered the dinosaur bones. \n\nI'm sorry if you cannot understand why this seems more real to me than your religion - but your limits are not my problem - so why should I or anyone else care what you think or say on the subject?
337553
the Ice Age and a giant meteor
846399
Perhaps if you posted the Latin you might get some responses.  How many people here on Yahoo who know Latin do you think have actually been there and have seen it?  And remember the whole inscription?
872081
Back in the 1400's Leonardo DiVinci proved that gravity is a consent force on all objects by dropping two different weight balls off of a tower.  Once proven, there was no need for each new generation to go back and try to rediscover his proof.  They can go back and re-read his proof, and maybe recreate his experiment.  It was proven.\n\nBy coming as He did in fulfillment of prophecy, Jesus provided all the proof anyone should ever need of his identity.  Go re-read Psalms 22 sometime.  We have manuscripts shown that this Psalm was in existence at least 250 to 400 years before the birth of Jesus.  )Most scholars place it 1000 years before the birth of Jesus, but because of the perishable nature of the ancient manuscripts, we have no known surviving copies from that far back.)\n\nCompare Psalms 22 to the events recorded on the cross when Jesus died.  His words are recorded.  The fact that they would crucify him by piercing his hands and feet - before the Romans introduced crucifixion around 50BC.  The fact that soilders would gamble for his garments, or pierce his side with a spear.  (If He was a fake, He could control His own actions and words - but how did He get His enemies to do those things?).  All should be proof of the believablity of the Bible.\n\nRe-read Matthew, and his listing of over 90 prophecies that Jesus fulfilled in his lifetime.  Again, many of the things like the place of his birth or his family line, were things He could not have controlled.  It had to be the hand of God.\n\nSo how many times does he have to prove it?  Its all recorded there for anyone who want to take the time to study it out.  Just like the records of DiVinci's experiment.\n\nPeople today are still duplicating DiVinci's experiment with the same results.  They can prove it to themselves if they do not trust his records.  The same is true for Christianity today.  Anyone who wants can decide to make a committment of their life to Christ, and they will be changed by it.  Happened to me, and happens everyday to thousands worldwide.  What more proof do you need?
197174
it hasnt been proven, but there are pictures out there, tho most of them are fake\n\ni personally believe that there probably once was one, but there really isnt much chance that it is still alive\n\nit was probably a decendent of some dinosaur thing\n\nso yea, id say it is, well, WAS real
490337
Wow i don't know what to believe, but like to keep an open mind.  How did oyur professor's friend get hold of the gold bananas?\n\nSounds weird but i think it's a sort of test, you know bad spirits and all that like when they discovered tutankamun's tomb....i certainly wouldn't have kept hold of them if they do exist!
1147506
As long as it was theory and not fact- there would be someone to dispute it.  So, no. Unfortunately.  \n\nBut it would be worth trying for, anyways.
798598
You certainly can try. It will help if you have a wittiness or some other form of proof.
794001
Its not been proven !!
813626
Sadly, I've actually heard about this before.  I can't believe how much useless junk I put into my head...I'd say pure fiction.  Its just more likely that he was some bored computer geek trying to get some attention.  Its still unclear whether or not time travel into the past is possible.  Based on current science I'm leaning toward the impossible side.  Oh well, 2036 will be here soon enough.  Then we'll know for sure.   ;)
809623
See you can ask a good question why you try!\n\nWell done!\n\nDid your mummy help you with that one?\n\nSeriously- you've got a good point there.\n\nThe Iceman.
561786
the human rase is much older than that. civilization is 6000 years old
297849
ask a historian who works at a nerdy college