when the doctor's refer to cutting down on red meats do they mean ham also?
922056
they mean all meat except fish and poultry.
723195
lol since you posted this in diet and fitness, i hope 'cut' means a cutting phase where you try to get your muscles defined.  lol!  simple answer...if you don't want to cut, then don't!
573394
To "mince" was to cut up, chop up, etc.  So the saying means, don't cut your words short.  Say what you mean, fully.
75694
i think it refers to which side your pork resides after you are dressed.left or right.
1107544
No, killing plants so that you can eat them is not part of the the "do not murder" command.  Neither is properly killing an animal for food.  \n\nHowever, there is also no command that you must eat animals everyday.  I know many within the Jewish community who are vegetarian 6 days out of the week and only eat meat on the Sabbath.  Eating meat was a somewhat rare thing in Biblical times, you did it at times of animal sacrifice and special celebration and that was it.  (Sabbath is a celebration which is why the rabbis say that you should eat meat on Sabbath).\n\nSo don't let them put you on a guilt trip because you don't eat meat.
824944
I'd say veggie; what could be wrong with eating vegetables and I'm sure that there are other ways to obtain protein\n   - I think meat has been linked to heart disease; matter of fact there was an article about the consumption of red meat on the front page of the Washington Post and the affects it has and how it makes women more prone to a certain kind of cancer but of course they will continue to sell it the same way they still sell milk
988177
These two words both have spanish origin "pan de sal" and "hamon" - ham. The first one is a bread usually eaten for breakfast. Hamon is what is the same as its spanish origin - ham. You must have been talking about breakfast when you heard this.
816564
First question is obvious, to find them in an already illuminated area instead of looking for them in the darkness.\nSecond question, Also obvious, the impact on the target is not the same if its used other language.\nThird question is a matter of taste, Spanish ham, when is "iberico y de bellota" is simply the most delicass ham in the world, nothing to do with salty and rare prosciutto or the similar "jambon de Bayonne".  Produced with a race of pork that only lives in Spain, and eating only the nut of the Oak tree. Its alimentation gives the ham its special taste, and makes also its fat to be the healthiest between animal fat. But as stated, it is a matter of taste, I prefer foreigners not to discover how delicious it is becouse its price is enough high (80-120€/Kg) as to increase more due to international demand.
117657
You are what you eat.\n\nIt's related to drugs/chemicals/subtances you intake. =P\n\nFood is medicine, medicine is food.
1183935
My heart goes out to you James...on any given day, I can go for pig feet, pit barbequed sausage, greens and ham hocks...or the mean pot liquor after the fact. I Or, I can get real enchaladas, carne guesada, pollo con mole or Caldo------ in Texas with Lousiana Roots. I know what you mean... I have lived in other areas where if i wanted some down home food...I had to cook it. Well....just cut a slice off that Virginia ham and throw in the bone and some onion and make you a good ole pot of beans and some rice... dont forget the cornbread... pour a big glass of Kool aid you'll feel better. ((((((big hug for the hungry man!!!))))))
779204
I've never followed Peter D'Adamo's protocol, although I might try some of his advice if I can ever find a copy of his book to borrow. I'm not interested in dieting, because I'm already slim and lean, but I'd be interested if his theories helped me feel better overall, of if they might help with some of my chronic disorders (asthma, acid reflux, ADHD, rosacea).\n\nHowever, I would NOT follow 100% of he says for my blood type, which is O positive. I'd only follow what is applicable to me. For example, I've heard that folks with my blood type should, according to D'Adamo, eat red meat 3 to 4 times a week. Well, that's OUT for me! I'm 34 and already have elevated cholesterol, due to a genetic propensity for this from my mom's side of the family. I am very slim, active, and for the most part eat very well-balanced, healthy meals, yet I STILL have the beginnings of a cholesterol problem. \n\nSo I sure as heck am not going to start eating a bunch of red meat!! It so happens I don't really even like most red meats (except hamburger), and I hate steak. I mainly eat white meat chicken, white meat turkey, and fish. But even if I loved red meat, I would still limit my consumption of it, in the hopes of keep my cholesterol numbers from becoming high enough to warrant medication like Lipitor. :(\n\nI guess my ramblings only answered the first part of your question ("Has anyone tried eating according to their blood type?"), but not the second part, about whether it helped or hindered them. :) But hopefully you found this interesting anyway.
1006573
I do not believe it is MEAT that is the bad thing i think it is the way we cook our food. If u did not fry everything then that would keep your arteries unclogged and save your life and give u a long life span but maybe not. "Leave eaters" can be less healthy if they do not substitute meat for let say soy or one of the other protein rich products out there.
280926
That refers, I believe, to genetic modification of foods.  Some people labled these as "Frankenfoods" (take off of the Frankenstein monster) to symbolize what happens when science tries to modify things.\nSomehow, they think that modified corn...which now grows twice as fast and has more nutrients in it...will harm us.  Instead of realizing that we can feed twice as many people, and feed the hungry all over the world, they just stick their fingers in their ears and become afraid of science, afraid of change.
211960
I don't see any logic on that. \nMaybe it is ture,as you say, but it is not true. In certain diseases it is recommended to eat meat.\nLet me tell you also that your Q is very generic.\nFirst, we know that (almost)everything depends on quantity. Do you mean that eating big amounts of red meat will harm yourself?\nThis is true. Consider the pyramide of nutrition and you have prooved that.\nSecond, it depends on age, sex and nutritional requirements on the basis of our job. \nThird, we have to specify that meat quality depends on the quality of food that the animal eats.You can have low fat meat.\n\nFor further information, go to http://www.usda.gov click on the consumer's section and then click on food and nutrition.\nThere is a plan that can help you choose the foods and amounts that are right for you.\n\nI don't refer to any religious convinctions that prohibit meat consumption or the philosophy which states that life is unique so we can't eat similar species. \n\n\nKaterina
13523
Rabbit.  Also the most digestable.  You didn't say, but fish is considered a meat also.  In that case, scallops and lobster are lower than anything with legs on them.  Bon Appetite.
733045
Meaning of the word "Halal": It means "permissible". In the Arabic language it refers to anything that is permissible under Islam.\n\nAdherents of Islam maintain that in order for food to be considered halal, it must not be a forbidden substance and any meat must have been slaughtered according to traditional guidelines set forth by the Sunnah, known as dhabiĥa or Zabihah. This is the strictest definition of halal.\n\nThe slaughtering process, known as dhabiĥa, is as follows.\n\n■ Pre-slaughter\n\nPrior to the slaughter, the animal's eyes and ears are checked to ensure that the animal is healthy and suitable for slaughter. If the animal is deemed to be healthy, it is first given water to drink (in order to quench its thirst).\n\n■ Standard recitation\n\nThe act of slaughtering an animal is an act that, according to the Quran, should be preceded by the mention of God (see Islamic Concept of God). Invoking the name of God at the moment of sacrifice is believed by some to serve as acknowledgement of God's right over all things. Furthermore, this invocation gives permission to the one performing the sacrifice to continue and endows the slaughterer with a sense of gratitude for God's creation, even prior to partaking in the meat of the animal.\n\nThus, the slaugther itself is preceded by the words "In the name of God, God is the Greatest Bismillah, Allahu Akbar.  The common phrase "Bismillah al Raĥman Al Raĥim" (In the name of God the Beneficent the Merciful) is not used here, because the act is one of subduement, not of mercy. Rather, the words Allahu Akbar (God is the Greatest) are used. This is to reiterate that the animal was only subdued for consumption by God's divine design and command, and is being slaughtered according to the guidelines prescribed.\n\n■ Slaughter\n\nAccording to Islamic tradition, the conventional method used to slaughter the animal involves cutting the large arteries in the neck along with the esophagus and trachea with one swipe of an unserrated blade. This method of slaughter serves a dual function: it provides for a relatively painless death and also helps to effectively drain blood from the animal. The latter is important because the consumption of blood itself is forbidden in Islam. Muslims consider this method of killing the animal to be cleaner and more merciful to the animal. During the blood draining process, the animal is not handled until it has died.\n\n■ Meat offered by Jews and Christians: Permissible for Muslims?\nPlease refer to my answer here:\nhttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AkpjqQs4H1NiKHONHPC5.6Psy6IX?qid=20061025160225AAqwI4D
556488
I saw something about this on a news show not long ago. It was about people who want doctors to cut off their arms or legs. At the end of the report, a man who froze both of his legs to death on purpose, and now lives in a wheel chair, said once he was finished with his legs he started wanting his hand cut off, too. Instead of going through with it he sought psychological treatment and they were able to free him from his obsession. He said that he now feels he should have gone for treatment sooner because he might still have his legs. To me, this is a sign that this is a treatable mental illness.\n\nI also believe it goes against the Hippocratic oath to cause harm or unnecessarily remove things that are not unhealthy. Arms and legs are not cosmetic body parts, they are a gift everyone with healthy limbs should be grateful for everyday.