are tiger body tone built . are lion toner built than the tiger?
931197
tigers are stronger and faster and "fitter" but in a fight the lion would win. cause they have been  fighting since young and are very well trained. they have also more hair and fats to protect them against bites
218033
A lot of it depends on who is the rabbit, male or female. As Tiger is one year older than rabbit, so if the male is a rabbit, I think that is okay, but if the female is older, than that is not so good.
507798
Siberian Tigers use scent (pheromone) communication by clawing trees and spraying urine to mark their territory, which can be many square miles in size. Vocalizations, however, constitute the tiger's main means of communication. Tigers are quite articulate and have a wide variety of vocalizations, such as chuffing, which is a type of affectionate greeting, growling, hissing, grunting, roaring and mewling, which is only used by cubs and courting tigers. Several of these vocalizations can be heard from some distance, and tiger roars can be heard several miles away.\n\nIn 2000 it was discovered that tigers, like whales, elephants, rhinos, and other animals, could create sounds low in frequency and some that are infrasonic and inaudible to the human ear. Twenty-four tigers were recorded at the Carnivore Preservation Trust in Pittsboro, N.C., and the Riverbanks Zoological Park in Columbia, S.C. It was found that tigers can create sounds around 18 hertz.\n\nThe use of infrasound is believed to be very advantageous for the tigers, as they would be able to communicate with each other through dense forest, and over long distances. Now it will be necessary to test whether tigers can hear these infrasonic and low frequency sounds. The more that we know about the legendary tiger, the more we can do to save them, and their place, in the wild.\nThat's all i know . Peace<3.
110583
Both are human derevatives.  They are just different brands.
121811
Have a look at some of the photos of lion-tiger crosses (Liger) on yahoo images . They grow absolutely massive because of some hormonal inhibiting mechanism going 'a bit funny in the mix'
397273
Laser printers. They yield so much more for the ink (which is toner) for the buck. The text is super crisp, just like in a magazine. And last much longer. Pages print super fast. There isn't any "printing alignment" that you have to do. You just put the toner cartridge in and you're good to go. They're so much better and easier on your wallet in the end. Think about it: four cartridges at about 30 bucks is 120 bucks. Maybe around 40 pages each is about 160 pages. A toner cartridge with even just low yield is around 80 bucks average, with around 2000 to 5000 pages yield.\n\nNo messy ink cartridges. And many of them you can exchange with companies that will sell you "refilled" toners at a cheaper cost.\n\nYou can get a black and white laser printer for around a hundred bucks now, and color for around 300.
730406
They really aren't knockoffs... EMG has them made as their entry level lineup.\n\nThe pickups are made by G&B Pickup Company in Korea, the same place MOST guitar factories use to have their pickups made. They don't have a website and sell only in large volume..perhaps 100 pickups at a time minimum.
1179916
on account of the thick mane, the lion has a slightly reduced chance of throat injury, and both animals use that as a natural target. With equal weight, and a large mane, I would give the lion just a slight edge. \n\nsupport the commuter revolution: http://www.hallisystem.bravehost.com
851255
I am pretty sure that it is a tiger, because I looked on their site, and they have listings of only tigers. I am assuming that they havent updated their site, sothey still list tigers. They do not list lions at all.
843110
Epiphone is Gibsons import line. They usually come from Korea but there are some that are made in China as well.\n\nThat being said, Epi workmanship easily rivals Gibson in many respects, but the electronics are cheaper and the woods tend to be a little lower quality.\n\nWould I buy a Gibson over an Epiphone today? Probably not. Is there $1000 worth of difference between the two? Absolutely not. If anything, I would upgrade the electronics in the Epi and leave it there.
87020
There is no difference between them, they are diffrent names for the same animal.\n_____\n\n>>>>>>First, is there such thing as a panther,\n>>>>> separate and distinct from a black leopard?\n\nNo. \n\nLet's set the wayback machine for 500BC, the early Roman Empire. At that time lions and leopards was still quite widespread in Egypt and Libya and was not uncommonly seen in Rome as a guard animal or exotic pet.\n\nBut travellers in those days also told stories of exotic and remarkable beasts like chimaeras, unicorns and rocs. And one of the exotic animals they told stories about was a large spotted cat called a pardus or pantherus. And just like the Rocs and unicorns the parda/panthera never existed. It was entirely made up. It had all sorts of remarkable traits. It could turn invisible. An adult pardus was at least as big as a lion but could shrink down to mimic a housecat so it get into houses and eat people in their sleep. A pardus could breath out a sweet fragrance that would cause its prey to become helpless and could even cause a human who breathed it to spend his life luting other humans off the road to be devoured by the pard.\n\nAnother common property of the Parda/Panthera is that they were all either male or female, and they could only reproduce by breeding with other animals. They mostly reproduced with lions (leo in Latin), giving rise to the hybrid animal know as leo pardus. A name the Romans later contracted to leopard. Early Romans seem to have genuinely believed that the leopard was not a species in its own right but a hybrid of a lion and the mythical panthera/parda.\n\nWhich is why we have all this confusion with the names. Panther applied to a fictitious big cat of unknown character, and a leopard was the offspring of a panther. Over time the names became every more confused and acquired subtly different meaning in the various European languages. \n\nBut in modern English the panther is just a leopard with black hair. They most commonly arise as individuals in a litter of otherwise perfectly normal leopards. Two spotted leopards will just produce black panthers occasionally. And two black panthers that breed will produce mostly spotted young. \n\nThe black hair is just a genetic quirk, it is exactly like red hair in humans. Just as two brown haired people can throw a red haired child, so two spotted leopards can throw black panther. \n\n>>>>Also, why would a melanistic version of a jaguar not be called a black jaguar instead of a black leopard?\n\nBecause South American countries speak Spanish or Portugese, not English. The word 'leopard' has a subtly different meaning in those languages. It is closer to the original Latin meaning of 'exotic big cat'. A black jaguar is rare enough to qualify as a leopard.\n\n>>>>>.... leopards are in Africa\n\nLeopards are the most widespread big cat on the planet. They are found in Africa, but they are also found through the middle east, into the Indian subcontinent and China and through South East Asia all the way to Java. They used to be common.\n\n>>> Makes no sense...\n\nIt makes no sense biologically. It makes perfect sense etymologically. \n\nJust like it makes perfect sense that Americans call a crocodilian alligator (literally meaning 'a lizard') when they have no close biological affinity to lizards. That could really confuse a Spanish speaker. But if you trace the etymology of the word it makes perfect sense.\n\nWords change there meaning over time, and when they hop between languages they often change meaning in very confusing ways.
1072215
Tigers, because they are beautiful creatures and I love them so much.  I love the way their muscles ripple when they walk...I love their unique markings....I love their eyes...I love everything about them.  I think they are the most amazing animal out there and also the most beautiful.
706005
The Les Paul Studio has a Maple Top, with a Mahogany Back .Not cheaper wood at all !! The studios just don't have the fancy finishes that the customs have , and the studio doesn't have binding around the body and neck . Mine is a gloss black color that looks awesome ,even with no binding around the body or neck .I wouldn't trade mine for anything !\n\nThe Studio model features dual-humbucking pickups which are offered in the more-expensive Les Paul models, as well as the same solid mahogany, carved-top feature. It does not have as many aesthetic appointments as the pricier models, giving it a more basic look. Most noticeable is the lack of body and neck binding, and lack of pearl inlays on the headstock.\n\nI love my les paul studio !\nHere's a few links for you , including all details and reviews of the Les Paul Studio !
474202
IBM had a few different golfballs, but a lot of them had a font that's now called "Courier New".  If you're using Windows, it should be in your list of fonts.  IBM also had some Prestige fonts, but I don't know what the TrueType replacement is for that.\n\nTo read more, go here:\n\nhttp://www.serbski-institut.de/wgl4fonts.htm
887945
No, but they have had similar lip injection plumper things. Maybe that's why they look alike.
556536
I disagree with everyone here.\n\nI think the lion would win. Which was also shown on a discovery channel show, I forget the name of the show...but they did mock fights with different animals. I don't know if itss till on the air.\n\nAnyway, a lion in the wild faces fights with other male lions over territory and family. But in the wild, a tiger rarely sees another tiger...they simply do not have the same skills a male african lion would have. A lion would win.
937827
http://www.tigerdirect.com