where can i find the standards & Specification  (Metric) for Steel I beams and coloumn?
354673
Well, you didn't say whether you're building a building, a bridge, a trestle, a tower, or other structure.  But you could start with some general articles, like this Wikipedia article, which has links to specific sites which give some specifications.\n\nThe other link gets properties for different I-beam sizes--I presume you understand the terminology well enough to read the resulting tables.
444937
Go to the websites of companies that sell the hardware and look up the specification sheets for each piece.
149815
The only organizational standard for SCC that i'm completely aware of is from the Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute and it was an interim standard.  It describes the testing methods as well as some other suggestions.  Below is a link to the Adobe Acrobat file.
334754
Structural steel ASTM-A36 400 650   \nSteel, high strength alloy ASTM A-514 690 760   \nSteel, high tensile 1650 1860   \nSteel, Piano wire  2000   \n\nrest below
890690
Emplacement Gantry ITS Standards Identification Study Rev 00A, ICN 00\n\n800-3OR-HEOO-00200-000-OOA\n\n \nApril 2005 \n\n\n\n1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE \nTo date, the project has established ITS performance requirements for SSCs based on identification and \ncategorization of event sequences that may result in a radiological release. These performance \nrequirements are defined within the NSDB. Further, SSCs credited with performing safe functions are \nclassified as ITS. In turn, perform confirmation for these SSCs is sought through the use of consensus \ncode and standards. \nThe purpose of this study is to identify applicable codes and standards for the WP Emplacement Gantry \nITS SSCs. Further, this study will form the basis for selection and the extent of applicability of each code \nand standard. \nThis study is based on the design development completed for LA only. Accordingly, identification of ITS \nSSCs beyond those defined within the NSDB are based on designs that may be subject to further \ndevelopment during detail design. Furthermore, several design alternatives may still be under \nconsideration to satisfy certain safety functions, and that final selection will not be determined until \nfurther design development has occurred. Therefore, for completeness, throughout this study alternative \ndesigns currently under considered will be discussed. Further, the results of this study will be subject to \nevaluation as part of a follow-on GAP analysis study. \nBased on the results of this study the GAP analysis will evaluate each code and standard to ensure each \nITS performance requirement is fully satisfied. When a performance requirement is not fully satisfied a \n“gap” is highlighted. Thereafter, the study will identify supplemental requirements to augment the code or \nstandard to meet performance requirements. Further, the GAP analysis will identify non-standard areas of \nthe design that will be subject to a Development Plan. Non-standard components and non-standard \ndesign configurations are defined as areas of the design that do not follow standard industry practices or \ncodes and standards. Whereby, performance confirmation cannot be readily sought though use of \nconsensus standards. \nThe ITS codes and standards identified in this document were developed by the Yucca Mountain Project \npersonnel from the Emplacement & Retrieval Project and are intended solely for the use of the Design \nand Engineering group in its work regarding the Emplacement and Retrieval system, specifically \nidentification of Emplacement and Retrieval equipment codes and standards. \n2. QUALITY ASSURANCE \nThis document was prepared in accordance with LP-ENG-014-BSC, Engineering Studies. The results or \nthis document are only to be used as the basis for selection of applicable codes and standards and are not \nto be used directly to generate quality products. Therefore, this engineering study is not subject to \nrequirements of the Quality Assurance Requirements and Description document (DOE 2004). \n3. USE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE \nComputer software used, Microsoft Word 2000, in this study is classified as exempt from procedure \nLP-SI.11Q-BSC, Software Management. All software used to prepare this analysis is listed under Section \n2.1 Software Not Subject To This Procedure, of LP-SI.11Q-BSC, Software Management. \n4. EMPLACEMENT GANTRY FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION \nThe function of the waste package emplacement gantry, is to maneuver a waste package and its associated \nemplacement pallet, from the bedplate of the waste package transporter positioned at the emplacement \ndrift dock, to the final emplacement position of the waste package within the emplacement drift. The \n\nsame waste package emplacement gantry can be used for waste package and pallet retrieval, where the \nprocess, is a reversal of the emplacement procedure. \nThe gantry design is that the waste package emplacement gantry will be an electrically powered, self-\npropelle
249584
u can find ur specification at \n\nwww.ambion.com
781568
yes it can be done. The 203 x 133 are I hope in millimetres.This would be 8 inch x 5 1/4 inch if you measure the beam it should be somewhere close.The weight of 30kg would depend upon the thickness of the metal in the different parts of the beam.A steel stockist could give you the thickness of the different weights per metre so you could compare the millimetre thickness given to the inch measure. To convert millimetre to inch  divide the number of millimetres by 25.4 if you know any engineers they should be able to assist.Not being at work I do not have the information to hand.If your local library has "KEMPS"  year book in its reference section that could help.Kellys directory would give you steel stockists, if you cannot find one locally.The info is probably on the internet somewhere.Can investigate further for you if you cannot resolve.
223058
Are you asking about grain size for metals? If so, I believe you will find an ASTM standard just for that. Try an ASTM search\n\nI believe is the standard is E-114 and the committee is E4
675964
ASTM Originally American Society for Testing and Materials, formed in 1898, now known as ASTM International it is a voluntary standards development organization which has created thousands of standard test methods by which materials and produced items are tested and evaluated and compared. \n\nStandard C90  is a Standard Specification for Loadbearing Concrete Masonry Units\nThe -70 part refers to the relative humidity. The standards were calculated at a place which has an average humidity of 70%.\n\nASTM C90 defines two types of concrete masonry units (CMU): Type-I Moisture-Controlled Units, and Type-II Non-Moisture-Controlled Units. Type-1 units must comply with moisture content requirements when delivered to the site. Proper use of this standard gives specifiers a way to limit residual drying shrinkage after installation.\n\nMoisture content requirements are based on the following, as outlined in ASTM C90 Table 1. (Minnesota and surrounding areas have a mean relative humidity of 70%.) \n\nShrinkage properties of the units, which varies due to materials and curing methods used. \n\nHumidity conditions at the site. \n\nAreas with higher relative humidity permit a higher moisture content. In areas with lower relative humidity, lower moisture content must be maintained. Units that exhibit lower shrinkage are allowed higher moisture content at the time of delivery to the site.\n\nType-I units must be protected from rain or other moisture to ensure the block does not absorb additional moisture before installation. The tops of unfinished masonry must also be protected from the weather.\n\nConcrete shrinks for two reasons: \n\nDrying. \n\nHydration of the cement. \n\nCMU that are almost completely hydrated and dried will shrink less. Two accelerated curing processes are used locally to produce Type-I units. \n\nLow pressure curing with an extended controlled drying cycle. This system, which takes 24 hours, is called CO2 EnviroTrol. It is used locally by Amcon Block and Precast. \n\nHigh pressure curing and drying. This system, known as autoclaving, takes about 12 hours. It is used locally by Anchor and Sheiley. \n\nBoth methods produce CMU that is Type I when delivered to the site.\n\nOther manufacturers rely on air drying, which can take 30 days or more. This block will eventually meet Type-I standards, but only after a much longer drying period.\n\nProperly spaced control joints are needed in masonry walls, regardless of the curing method. Use of Type-II units may require closer control joints or increases horizontal reinforcement.\n\nBoth of the two accelerated curing methods discussed produce CMU that shrinks less, shows minimal efflorescence, is more consistent in appearance, and is available with far less lead time than air-dried units.
291223
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/standards.htm\nNIST for the most part,,,,
369527
The 1997 Uniform Building Code set the standard on seismic design for buildings.  You might try searching for that on Yahoo!
1120387
http://www.parkercad.org/
1058235
Check out steel in wikipedia
9774
http://www.lowes.com/lowes/lkn?action=howTo&p=Build/TapeMeasure.html
285310
Try contact the ASTM Directly - it's one of their specs.\n\nA311/A311M-04 - Standard Specification for Cold-Drawn, Stress-Relieved Carbon Steel Bars Subject to Mechanical Property Requirements.\n\nwww.astm.org\n\nThanks!!! Morgan x :o)
958015
check out the site of Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). It has catalogued references of specifications of various materials and standards.
452629
The weight of steel you can find through density and volume.The density /specific weight of steel C 35 --0.0784 N/cc.\n\nCalculate the volume of the steel component and then multiply it with the density given above. Remember to take care of unit you are following.