use confronted, symposium, unanimous, ground, primacy and principles in a sentence?
349095
I confronted a symposium of primacy ground dwelling aliens with unanimous principles.
208284
Ma ---> (Ma)yonaize\ng-->(w)ill\nei-->(i)mmortal\nri-->(ri)ta\nco-->(co)cain\npho-->(fo)to\nbia-->(via)l
916340
perfidy\nscruple\ndoubt\nsuspicion\nincertitude\nwariness
188284
It is common structure. I don't think it is overly wordy. In common conversation or informal writing, it would be fine. If it is for formal writing, I would remove the suggestion portion and make it a more commanding statement.
935957
Strife\nTrials and tribulations\nAnguish\n\n:)
728570
starting with a quote is always good, make sure it relates to your paper.\n\nor you could say "(subject) and (subject) seem to be very alike in many ways. However, they are actually very different."\n\nhave fun!
268437
prevailing standard\n\naccepted standard\n\n"the right way"
329254
Respect \n\nResponsibilities\n\nLove and Peace
245611
Friendship,respect,honesty,\ntrust,love,commitment,\ntolerance
282405
A.sentence 1 is the topic sentence.
900174
How about:\n"I need a sentence with notwithstanding in it?"
938873
concentration\nattention\ndetection\ndetention\nattraction\nintention\nseduction
144410
Read the texts that you have to write on. Then read it again. Underline the main points. Take out 3 to 5 ideas that you disagree with and 3-5 points that that you agree with. Thensit down and write. If it is posible, write down how these ideas apply "now and here".
698404
As\nSee link below, under "As a Conjunction"...:D
299538
tres simple.\n\nstewardesses.
585807
You can use against which in a sentence; ie, The injustice against which the protesters were rallying continued to increase in prominence\n\nHowever, in your case, the use of against which is not correct; something like "the money for which the farmers hoped was not forthcoming."
784186
Option 1: take a controversial topic and defend one side. (like abortion, immigration, national security, homosexuality, etc.)\n\nOption 2: take a ridiculous topic and defend one side (like "the sky is purple" "people should eat elephants" "convicts should eat each other" "Canada should annex Zimbabwe" etc"\n\nOption 3: take a mediocre topic and talk about it (like "people are good" "I should have an A on this presentation" etc.)