can god make a burrito so hot he himself cannot eat it?
354729
Maybe, but he can't make a burrito that is too hot for Chuck Norris.
1109099
A plate of abomination seasoned with ritual sacrifice and intolerance, please.
363818
He can't, not in Heaven.
784211
If things were impossible for God, He wouldn't be God.\n\nNow people will turn a question like this into something that would test God (i.e. the famous "if God can do anything, can He create a rock so big He couldn't move it?").  The answer lies in the fact that while He *can* do anything and *nothing* is impossible with Him, he would not do something that contradicts His very nature and being because He is perfect.
654843
Someone called Bart Simpson asked whether god could make a burrito so hot that he couldn't eat it; that was kinda fun.\n\nBut I love all of jim_darwin's questions!  \n\n(Does this make me a troll, too? or perhaps a troll groupie?)
711512
no. all religion makes you burn
342509
You are assuming that God is limited to what we think of Him.  That is wrong.  God could not do anything that will limit his abilities, including what you ask.\n\nRead this for further clarification:\n\nGod and Omnipotence\nThe paradox of the stone, as presented by Wade Savage:\n1. Either God can create a stone that God cannot lift, or God cannot create a stone that God cannot lift – there are no other possibilities. \n2. If God can create a stone that God cannot lift, then there is at least one thing that God cannot do (i.e., lift that stone). \n3. If God cannot create a stone that God cannot lift, then there is at least one thing that God cannot do (i.e., create that stone). \n4. From the combination of 1, 2 and 3, it follows that there is at least one thing that God cannot do. \n5. If God is omnipotent, then God can do anything. \n6. Therefore, God is not omnipotent. \n\nWhat this argument apparently shows is that omnipotence is impossible (or, that the notion of omnipotence is incoherent). Thus, God cannot be omnipotent (as nothing can be).\n\nSuggested solutions to the paradox St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274):\nAquinas defines as “absolutely impossible” any thing where the “predicate is altogether incompatible with the subject” (his example: “man is an ***” (in the non-metaphorical sense)). With this in mind:\nWhatever implies contradiction does not come within the scope of divine omnipotence, because it cannot have the aspect of possibility. Hence it is more appropriate to say that such things cannot be done, than that God cannot do them.\n\nThat is, to be omnipotent involves being able to do all things that are possible. For example, it is not considered a limit to my powers that I cannot draw a square circle. That’s impossible, so it’s no failing that I can’t do it – it cannot be done.\n\nBUT: surely I can make a thing that is too heavy for me to lift, so that task is not impossible, so if God can’t do it, that really is a limit to his power.\n\nGeorge Mavrodes (1926-):\nMavrodes responds that although “a stone too heavy for Simon Cushing to lift” is not a contradictory notion, “a stone too heavy for an omnipotent being to lift” is a contradictory notion.\nMavrodes’s argument in full:\n1. Either God is omnipotent or he is not. \n2. If God is not omnipotent, then the fact that he cannot do something (either make or lift the stone) is unsurprising. \n3. If God is omnipotent, then, by definition, there necessarily cannot be a stone that is too heavy for him to lift (otherwise he would not be omnipotent). \n4. If there necessarily cannot be such a stone, then it is an impossibility. \n5. By Aquinas’s reasoning, even an omnipotent being cannot perform impossibilities. \n6. Therefore, by definition, inability to create a stone too heavy for one to lift is no barrier to being omnipotent. (In fact, only non-omnipotent beings can create objects too heavy for themselves to lift.) \n\nBUT: both Aquinas and Mavrodes assume that God cannot do impossible things. Is this right? Descartes, for one, thought not. Descartes believed God could make 2+2=5. Why? Because otherwise you are suggesting that God is bound by the laws of logic. But if God created the laws of logic, why should he be bound by them? Couldn’t he have made them differently?\n\nHarry Frankfurt:\nHowever, if we assume that God can do impossible things, then God can create a stone too heavy for him to lift (which is supposedly impossible). Furthermore, if he can do that, then he can go one stage further and lift that stone (also impossible – but what’s the difference between doing one impossible thing and doing two?) \nBUT: doesn’t that mean that the stone he created was not a stone too heavy for him to lift, and that we’re back to the situation of him being unable to create such a stone? Not according to Frankfurt:\nIf an omnipotent being can do what is logically impossible, then he can not only create situations which he canno
847819
A burrito is not a sandwich. Think of it as a giant egg-roll with refried beans and meat in it.
219488
its depends on the bible he owns because bible is the most book has different from one to anther ... maybe some bibles not allowing eating potato .... you know i don't believe in bible anyway
723345
I really do not like to say that God cannot do this or cannot do that but in this case, I think that:\n\nGod cannot quit being God.\n\nJust like you cannot quit being yourself.\n\nWith love in Christ.
498765
I agree with all those above.   How about adding "Can god create a rock so heavy that even he can't lift it?"  or "can he create a burrito so hot he can't eat it?".  I'm an atheist and totally sick of those.  \n\nI'm also pretty sick of a lot of the Muslim bashing questions here.  They seemed to have finally slackened somewhat... so maybe that one is passing.
879431
Wow that is amazing.  I never knew this.  I am going to look that up when I get home and read about it.\n\nAs far as my answer to your question - I do not believe god can do it because I don't believe the bible...\n\nstill you have an interesting point
603827
Hey, at least he'll be giving you free heating! Or maybe it's a trial version of Hell !? Ohhh! Isn't that where all the nasty hypocrites go!? You know, like the one's that go on about Philipino girls??
1047563
Well, it is possible, but He wouldn't. God is not one to bombard into your life if you don't want Him in it. God allows His Children the freedom of choice, that is, free will. This was decided at the beginning of time, Adam and Eve ate the apple because God gave them the choice. Understand, though, that every choice has consequences, whether that be positive or negative. Often, those consequences are built into the action itself. For example, the Adam and Eve story. They were warned by God to avoid the fruit, yet they ate it anyways. As a result, sin entered the world. Being that this was the tree of life and knowledge, we could anticipate that this would be the result of the decision. The same is true for anything else in life. God bless!\n\nThis does not prove against His omnibenevolence, as He is perfectly capable of forcing you to believe in Him. He just chooses not to force it upon you, because He loves you to the point of giving you free will. He will never force anyone to do anything. In His goodness and mercy, that is the way He is.
1019353
What man can't do, God can. He can do anything, He is God.\n\nMan, can't get into Heaven by himself. Because we are not clean enough. But God can make us clean enough.
1122321
Certainly He could.  There is nothing that God can't do.  However, if He were to make such a boulder, then there would be something he couldn't do.\n\nWhere is it written that God can't relinquish His omnipotence?
1151762
LMFAO. make a burrito!