i want to explain this topic as a summary with examples"he makes no friend who never made a foe."?
351700
Your proper starting sentenc is actually that quote. Give the location from where it came right after that, and then go into the history.\n\nOR You could tell a story about you, someone you know, or just someone fictional. Then you could use this sentence as the very last one. Tie up your entire story to fall into that one line at the end.\n\nGood Luck
505446
Don't get excited by a new word.\n\nWhat caused the crime?\n Environment?\n Mental impairment?\n Motivations of revenge?\n Passion? (blinded by love or infatuations)\n Learned behavior?\n\nThe list goes on and on. The arguments can be appreciated by both sides in the interest of justice and corrections.
256992
Here's a good example:\n \n-----x----\nBe sure to read all the way to the end..... it's worth! \n  \nNext time someone starts to spread gossip, think of this: \n\nIn ancient Greece (469 - 399 BC), Socrates was widely lauded for his wisdom. \n\nOne day the great philosopher came upon an acquaintance who ran up to him excitedly and said, "Socrates, do you know what I just heard about one of your students?" \n\nWait a moment," Socrates replied. "Before you tell me I'd like you to pass a little test.It's called the Triple Filter Test." \n\n"Triple filter?" \n\n"That's right," Socrates continued. "Before you talk to me about my student let's take a moment to filter what you're going to say. The first filter is Truth. Have you made absolutely sure that what you are about to tell me is true?" \n\n"No," the man said, "actually I just heard about it and..." \n\n"All right," said Socrates. "So you don't really know if it's true or not. Now let's try the second filter, the filter of Goodness. Is what you are about to tell me about my student something good?" \n\n"No, on the contrary..." \n\n"So," Socrates continued, "you want to tell me something bad about him, even though you're not certain it's true?" \n\nThe man shrugged, a little embarrassed. \n\nSocrates continued. "You may still pass the test though,because there is a third filter - the filter of Usefulness. Is what you want to tell me about my student going to be useful to me?" \n\n"No, not really..." \n\n"Well," concluded Socrates, "if what you want to tell me is neither True nor Good nor even Useful,why tell it to me at all?" \n\nThe man was defeated and ashamed. \n\nThis is the reason Socrates was a great philosopher and held in such high esteem. \n \nIt also explains why he never found out that Plato (his student) was having an affair with his wife. \n                          \n--x--\n\nHope that helps.
983239
your thesis is your statement, the subject of your paper, so what do you want to say about friends competing? \n\nsome possible ideas\n\n"competing against a friend is difficult"\n\n"friendships can remain strong when there is competion "\n\n"i thought competing against a friend would be hard and it  was/wasnt"\n\n"there are positive things and negative things about competing against a friend"\n\nits always best, in your paper, to list 3 reasons to support your thesis,,,,,  such as 3 reasons why it was difficult, if that is your thesis \n\ndont know what that "text to self " means
344566
In "Mending Wall" and other poems Frost examines the tension between human connectedness and separateness.  \n\nPeople often quote that poem, saying that he says that "Good fences make good neighbors." If you read the poem carefully, you'll see that it is the poet's neighbor that says that, not the poet himself. The poet wants him to think that over, but all he says is "Good fences make good neighbors."
793373
I'm sorry that you're having so much trouble. I'm having trouble helping you interpret the question being that I haven't read that particular novel. I wish you the best of luck, but I can tell you that several people in your class are probably having the same trouble. So, any interpretation of the question that you would have would certainly be better than nothing!! ;)
873942
This is a Zen teaching story called "The Gift of Insults"\n\nThere once lived a great warrior. Though quite old, he still was able to defeat any challenger. His reputation extended far and wide throughout the land and many students gathered to study under him.\nOne day an infamous young warrior arrived at the village. He was determined to be the first man to defeat the great master. Along with his strength, he had an uncanny ability to spot and exploit any weakness in an opponent. He would wait for his opponent to make the first move, thus revealing a weakness, and then would strike with merciless force and lightning speed. No one had ever lasted with him in a match beyond the first move.\n\nMuch against the advice of his concerned students, the old master gladly accepted the young warrior's challenge. As the two squared off for battle, the young warrior began to hurl insults at the old master. He threw dirt and spit in his face. For hours he verbally assaulted him with every curse and insult known to mankind. But the old warrior merely stood there motionless and calm. Finally, the young warrior exhausted himself. Knowing he was defeated, he left feeling shamed.\n\nSomewhat disappointed that he did not fight the insolent youth, the students gathered around the old master and questioned him. "How could you endure such an indignity? How did you drive him away?" \n\n"If someone comes to give you a gift and you do not receive it," the master replied, "to whom does the gift belong?"
606369
simple,\nthey my friend,\nare not Christians.\n\nGod does not want wars to be in "His name", He is LOVE.
596241
Is there a difference between failing to acknowledge and failing to include?  Is that your question?\n\nI guess so, but it's subtle.  \n\nIf I'm not on speaking terms with you, but throwing a baby shower for a mutual friend, I may invite you.  I might not make a big deal about you being there and you may not feel acknowledged, but you have been included.\n\nI could speak to you in a group of mutual friends but exclude you from joining us at my house for a party.\n\nAh.  I guess agnosticism would be close.  I think strictly speaking agnostics believe there is a God, but that we can't really know much about Him.  Not enough evidence to convict them to make a commitment.\n\nEven though I didn't understand your intent when you asked the initial question, if you look at the first part of my answer, I think it still applies.\n\nWould you want a friend who failed to acknowledge you or who excluded you?  Either way you go, we don't like people to treat us this way.  We want for people to be happy to see us and to acknowledge us and our friendship in public, to include us in their lives, to be close.  True friends are loyal and stand up for each other.\n\nJesus wants the same things with us.  He is a true and faithful Friend.  He hurts at being snubbed much in the same way we would.\n\nIf you won't do it to a friend, don't do it to Him.
354303
Try reading the book "Reading the enemies mind" By Paul Smith. It will answer alot of the questions that you have.\n\nAlso take a look at his website.\n\nhttp://www.rviewer.com/\n\nGood Luck.
47653
If this a formal essay paragraph, stay away from idioms such as "pick of the bunch", "friend for all seasons", and "fair-weather one".\n\nDoes the prompt to this paragraph deal with religion or God?  If not, abstain from mentioning that.\n\nAs the other guy said, your conclusion should summarize what you said and restate your thesis, or main point.  You could possibly be relating each characteristic listed in your conclusion to a support previously mentioned, but those don't relate too well.\n\nAnd don't use big words when nice, smaller ones will do.  When people see big words such as cordiality and magnanimity, they just think "huh?" and move on.\n\nExplain your support a little better and clearer.  What does it mean to have one's "moral principles" "in conformity with each other so you have the minimum contrast"?\n\nIf you're going to say a proverb, be sure to explain it and how it supports your thesis.\n\nGood luck editing and hope this helps!
1146029
It's:\n\nOne may have a blazing hearth in one's soul and yet no one ever comes to sit by it. Passersby see only a wisp of smoke rising from the chimney and continue on their way.
222575
1)  Old Major warns, "Your resolution must never falter.  No argument must lead you astray.  Never listen when they tell you that Man and the animals have a common interest....we must not come to resemble him...No animal must ever live in a house or sleep in a bed, or wear clothes, or drink alcohol, or smoke tobacco, or touch money, or engage in trade." \n\n\n2)  Orwell narrates, "Nobody stole, nobody grumbled over his rations, the quarreling and biting and jealousy which had been normal features of life in the old days had almost disappeared." \n\n\n3)  Squealer consoles the animals, saying, "Do not imagine, comrades, that leadership is a pleasure.   On the contrary, it is a deep and heavy responsibility.  No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal.  He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves.    But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"  The classic hypocrisy seen here is too hard to miss.  \n\n\n4)  Orwell explains, "Once again the animals were conscious of a vague uneasiness.  Never to have any dealings with human beings, never to engage in trade, never to make use of money— had not these been among the earliest resolutions passed at the first triumphant Meeting when Jones was expelled?”  \n\n\n5)  As Napoleon was deceiving the neighboring farmers he was also tricking his own animals.  The scapegoat was again Snowball.  "Whenever anything went wrong it became usual to attribute it to Snowball."  In fact many of the claims begin to sound ridiculous to the objective mind.  Of course, Squealer's mission is to keep everything subjective in the minds of the animals. \n\n\n6)  So Napoleon, with the help of his dogs, slaughters anyone who is said to be disloyal.     "...the tale of confessions and executions went on, until there was a pile of corpses lying before Napoleon's feet and the air was heavy with the smell of blood, which had been unknown there since the expulsion of Jones."  To top it off, Napoleon outlaws Beasts of England, which had served as one of the only remaining ties between Animal Farm and old Major.  \n\n\n7)  But when Muriel reads the writing on the barn wall to Clover, interestingly, the words are, "No animal shall kill any other animal without cause." \n\n\n8)  But to justify this little episode, arrangements to amend the rules are made.  "No animal shall drink alcohol to excess."  \n\n\n9)  Orwell states, "Somehow it seemed as though the farm had grown richer without making the animals themselves any richer— except, of course, for the pigs and the dogs."  \n\n\n10)  The 7 Commandments are abridged for the last time, simply reading, "All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others."\n\nThese can all be related to the metaphors that the book embrases
670113
Self respect says you got to take a stand, or you wouldn't be asking this here.  Think of it this way, would you want friends that can't be brave unless they have back up? or the one that stands alone, and cares enuff about you to keep coming back for more?  Choose sides, then, side all parties down, and tell them straight out what you just said to us, we used to be kewl, now we are not, I can't take it anymore, lets work it out, or I got to choose sides.  And don't let the 2, lay all the blame on the one.\nPersonally, I wouldn't even try talking, I would take the loner's side, and just see what happened.  If they left, fine, I expected it, but who knows, might scare them into backing off.
934808
Sure!\nJust write down a list of things that happened in that section of the book, then expand this list into sentences using the words above.  It will be more coherent if you keep the events in the same chronological order in which they occurred.\n\nSince you asked for "help," you didn't expect us to write it for you, did you?
1121429
Of course it doesn’t make sense. “Love your enemies” is an absurdity. If you love them they can’t be your enemy. What the confused writer was probably trying to say is to love those who view (((you))) as their enemy, and this would make some sense.\n\nAnd not to mention that the writer’s god is a hypocrite since he sends his enemies to hell.
459458
don't put him in that position . . . be his friend even if he is friends with your enemy