Why do the IRA sign all statements 'P O'Neill'?
354939
P. O'neill is the so-called "Army Council" of seven leading republicans.
906665
it is a quite simple yes mate, I am an ex Guardsman who served along side guys from the Republic who joined the Irish Guards.\n\nThey will carry out all the same standard checks as if you lived in the UK. I wish you all the best in the future.
52979
as can be sen in history occuping countries never works. look at IRa now. Algeria when the french tried to ocupy them. America being occupied by britain. it never works. coutries what there own soverignty. they want to be able to make there own decisions.
397200
That's a tough question. His online braid-selling scheme sure didn't work. But he did claim to put all his money in a Ross IRA. Then again, you can't really trust anything he says, because he's dumb. He even admits it. He sent out a press release about it and everything.
1127689
ALL OF YOUR DOCUMENT ARE BELONG TO US\n\n\nIt's because they are idiots, everyone knows that!
165091
No.  IRA's may not hold certain classes of assets and closely held corporations are one of them.  Likewise, if you happened to be the Chairman of IBM, you couldn't invest in that either.
885768
None, and I believe none since.  How long the the USA harbour supporters and fundraisers for the IRA
757317
Hello,,\nI'm no expert on Irish politics or economics,,,which are typically 2 primary considerations in  foreign investment.\n\nI Do know a few Irish stocks which trade on American exchanges.\n\nThey have generally done well,,both as Companies and in terms of maintaining American Investors' confidence.\n\nThat's not real research,,but it's a Positive Indication towards both InvestorSentiment and Ireland's economic/business climate\n\nAnd I don't know of anything about Ireland which would make Investing  there particularly or unusually risky.\n\n\nAIB IRE CRH ELN ICLR IONA RYAAY SKIL TRIB\n\nThere's a few US Traded "pink sheets" also,\n\nAGIBY CCGGY GLAPY GNCGY KRYAY GCMXY\n\nAll those represent only a small sampling of "Business in Ireland",but as you can see the stocks have done pretty well\n\nhttp://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=AIB,IRE,CRH,ELN,ICLR,IONA,RYAAY,SKIL,TRIB\n\nYou may have to check the PinkSheet Symbols on BigCharts.com,etc to see their charts in order to observe their historical performances.\n\nhttp://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=agiby&sid=0&o_symb=agiby&freq=2&time=13\n\n\nActual research can be done online according each specific company.\n\n\nIreland seems OK to me\n\nHope that helps
729912
I've read his post 3 times and can't see any mention of his religion. \nDo you think he doesn't know the laws in his country? Why do people feel compelled to point it out?\nIf he was Irish, would you all be saying "Catholics don't allow homosexuality"?\nLeave you preaching where it belongs, and that's not here!!!!
531660
You should talk to a representative at your financial institution where you have your IRA. They will be more than happy to give you individualized suggestions.
787804
Are you thinking of a ROTH IRA?  It is named after the author of the bill allowing/creating this type of investment that allows for tax free withdrawals at retirement because the contributions have already been taxed.  Unlike a traditional IRA where the contributions are pre-tax and you pay the taxes once you begin withdrawing at retirement.\n\nRoth was the legislator who contrived this investment.
189431
Absolutely.  There used to be signs up saying NINA.  This means No Irish Need Apply.
648252
There are a lot of rules on SEP IRA's. It's not common to REQUIRE employees to pay in  but if you don't, you will not be eligible for employer contributions (unless your employer is extremely extra-generous).  Their statement that a contribution by you is "required" may really mean it's a requirement to contribute IF you want the employer match; they may just have worded it strangely.  Usually if you do not contribute to your own IRA, the employer does not either.  In fact, I have never heard of an employer putting money in someone's IRA or 401(k) regardless of the variety if the employee does not make contributions (although I am sure it could happen).\n\nContributing to your SEP IRA is a really, really good thing and I'm not sure why you'd want to bypass that--- it lowers your taxable income (this is super important, especially if you are on a 1099 form) and your employer match is basically free money--- you don't have to do anything to get it except put away some of your own money for retirement.
409368
Well, if I'm getting your jist correctly, one of the people left out of the signing was George Washington. he didn't sign because he wasn't sure if he wanted to give the American people the idea that he wanted get into Foriegn affairs...or something to that effect. I'm sure someone else can explain it better.
1142206
Eric Partridge lists it in his 'Dictionary of Slang', 1937. He gives it the meaning 'all will be well', which is not quite how it is used now. Partridge states it as dating from circa 1890, although he presents no evidence for that. Also he suggests that it may be derived from the phrase 'all is bob', which meant 'all is well'.\n\nAnother interpretation is that it derives from the supposed nepotism of Lord Salisbury. Piers Brendon, in Eminent Edwardians, 1979, writes:\n\n"... in 1887, Balfour was unexpectedly promoted to the vital front line post of Chief Secretary for Ireland by his uncle Robert, Lord Salisbury."\n\nVarious authors have surmised that having an uncle Bob who was Prime Minister became synonymous with having a passport to an easy life.
1033041
When in Belfast, be sure to look up the headquarters of the Ulster Freedom Fighters.  They're the radical Orangemen who decorate their buildings with murals of masked gunmen carrying assault weapons and displaying the "bloody red hand", a modern symbol of terrorism in Northern Ireland.  Golly, the liberal media had you thinking that the IRA were the bad guys, right?
270853
The truth is that Karl Rove, Dick Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, etc. etc. had been working to make The Project For A New American Century (PNAC) a reality. The problem was how to sell such an ambitious plan to a MOTR public. Pax Americana might make some people nervous. But if there was something like a terrorist attack on the country, then it could be put in place....as it was. The fact is that Bush had some information on the likelihood of some kind of an attack, but they had no idea of the magnitude of what actually did happen.( Hey. Even OBL was surprised) But They let it go, thinking it would be something more typical yet good enough to get the country into a fighting mood, which is exactly what was needed for PNAC to survive. Indeed, what's so remarkable, is that the PNAC document itself bemoans the unlikeliness of getting the MOTR America to follow its more ambitious plans *unless* something catastrophic happened to change people opinions on such matters. 9/11 happened, and everything since Afghanistan fits the PNAC template perfectly. Want to know why Iraq was attacked while OBL was left alone? Read PNAC. Want to know why the animosity to the World Court, to the United Nations, to any international standards of behavior? Read PNAC. It's all there in black and white.