What is a credible source? Why is it important?
336443
Credible means believable.  A source is where you find information, so you want the information that you find to be believable when you're making an argument using this information.
24833
Might be yes, might by no. Some answer is given along with the source where it is found. So it is legitimate or not, it's for you to judge. \nTo me, these answers in here is more like a guide.
268947
A scholarly article is one that is found in a reputable source.  An academic journal is a good example of such a source.\n\nIt would also probably have strong evidence to prove its point - an opinion paper may not.
908945
you can't be sure that information is true unless it is from an important site.\nIf you need facts, go to lots of sites and use the most common answer.\nBut it shouldn't matter whether a person says they are really who they are, because if you want to talk to someone it's not safe to do so on some random site.
101425
a challenge would be in obtaining the info from an accurate source n presenting their credibility. teachers rlly look for that in big papers.
716300
I am not sure you are clear enough about what you are asking. Surely all financial information is subjectively relevant. If you simply want evidence that a company is trading the fact that any financial information is available is a good start, do you necessarily need that information to be reliable if you are not for example extending credit to a buyer? If you want reliable information you can search audited accounts at Companies House or perhaps use a credit reference service such as Dun & Bradstreet who have worldwide information on companies.
767229
Truth is within. You can only get it from that source.
180438
it is important.  But what about it?
133069
- Reliability of product\n- Peace of mind for buyer and seller\n- Credibility\n- Future Business prospects\n- Benchmark
994165
Does it have to be the truth?
320639
I guess if the person who answers the questions has a reliable source...otherwise Yahoo! Answers is just for fun.
357258
Not completely. One should never trust only ONE source of information. They may not have every fact on the subject and a single view can be biased. Try a few different sources and get a more well rounded take on it.
449842
If you are talking about natural resources, then a good thing to have would be to be renewable. Otherwise it will soon run out.\n\nIf you're talking about in general, a resource, then it should give sufficient information, have sources, authors, and all other things necessary to cite it. Meaning there should be proof to back it up if you're...for example, talking to someone as a resource. Like an interview.
180411
Whether the source is well-knows as being reliable. Whether the source is biased to say something specific (companies can never be trusted with scientific data). And, whether the data appears to hold up to theory.\n\nAs a nanotech student I use a lot of information found on the internet, but most if it is more practical information (how to conduct specific experiments) than theoretical (can be found in books). Consequently, it is easy to see whether the information is useful or just bogus.
1021028
Because it's reliable. If you base choices, definitions or beliefs on a lie then once the truth is discovered (no matter how long it takes) your choice, definition or belief will come crumbling down since these were not founded on the reliable 'truth'.
939935
I agree with most of your figures but please post your resource to be more credible.
382799
What is your source for this information?