Who was Paul's nephew in Acts 22? what was his name?
351625
:}\nThe reference you mentioned is in Acts 23:16\n\n" And when Paul's sister's son heard of their lying in wait, he went and entered into the castle, and told Paul."\n\nIt is the only reference in scripture of Paul's immediate family. one might speculate that Pall's sister had married , perhaps a dignitary from Jerusalem, which would explain why this young man was there rather than Tarsus, and why he had access to the castle
57242
<">Jesus had both 1/2 brothers and sisters. no record that I know of exist of what any of his sisters reported.\nHis brother James did write one of the epistles.\nThere is of course only one Jesus
354200
I would say that Paul's ministry was on of total submission to his Savior , Jesus.  He went where he was sent, no matter the risk.  He knew he was destined to go into the heart of Rome.  He was arrested and had the ability as a roman citizen to immediately tell his captors who he was.  He would have been released from captivity, by the Judge.  Instead he appealed to Caesar even though it could mean his ultimate demise.  Now that is submission.
973053
Lacking any biblical reference to Paul's death, we are forced to turn to tradition for the details of his final years. One tradition holds (attested as early as in 1 Clement 5:7, and in the Muratorian fragment) that Paul visited Spain and Great Britain. While this was his intention (Rom 15:22–7), the evidence is inconclusive. Another tradition places his death in Rome. Eusebius of Caesarea states that Paul was beheaded in the reign of the Roman Emperor Nero. This event has been dated either to the year 64, when Rome was devastated by a fire, or a few years later, to 67. An ancient liturgical solemnity of Peter and Paul, celebrated on 29 June, could reflect the day of martyrdom, and many ancient sources articulated the tradition that Peter and Paul died on the same day (and possibly the same year). Chronologically, the tradition that Paul was martyred in Rome is not inconsistent with the suggested mission to Spain. However, there is little additional evidence to support these traditions, though no evidence exists contradicting them either.\n\nIt is commonly accepted that Paul died as a martyr in Rome and his body was interred with Saint Peter's in ad Catacumbas by the via Appia where it remained until moved by Lucina and Pope Cornelius into the crypts of Lucina.[6] One Gaius, who wrote during the time of Pope Zephyrinus, mentions Paul's tomb as standing on the Via Ostensis, and the Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls consistently claimed to be built upon Paul's tomb. This claim was given much support by the recent archaeological discovery of a tomb under the basilica bearing Paul's name, the titles "apostle" and "martyr", and dating to antiquity.\n\n\n\nYour sister,\nGinger
734017
Paul is the chosen vessel of the gentiles..................\n\notherwise...\ntoss out the new testament.............
309088
Historically, they weren't in agreement about any. Jesus followed and presented his own message with no indication that he ever, while alive, met Paul.\n\nPaul followed and interpreted what he felt Jesus' message was and only began doing this after Jesus' death. No conference calls. ("Saul, why do you persecute me?")
444902
Hi there,\n\nThe apostles are listed in Matthew 10:2 "These are the names of the twelve apostles: first, Simon (who is called Peter) and his brother Andrew; James son of Zebedee, and his brother John; Philip and Bartholomew; Thomas and Matthew the tax collector; James son of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus; Simon the Zealot and Judas Iscariot, who betrayed him."\n\nJudas Iscariot is replaced by Matthias in Acts 1:23-26.\n\nMark is understood to be the sidekick or secretary of Peter. This is why his Gospel is included, as it contains information of an eyewitness (Peter), even though the author themselves may not have been one of the twelve. This however, does not mean they were not necessarily there.\n\nLuke makes it known that his account is compiled from an investigation of the events. (Luke 1:1-4)\n\nLuke is also the author of the book of Acts (or The Acts of the Apostles). Although written mainly in the third person, Luke makes it known that we was present at the events starting from Luke 16:10 by using the word "we" instead of "they".\n\nAs a bit of trivia, Luke appears to have written Luke and Acts as one volume, to the same audience, a person referred to as Theophilus (Luke 1:1, Acts 1:1).
975000
Jesus Christ had already ascended into heaven and thus didn't disciple Saul/Paul. This took a personal encounter after Christ's ascension, on the road to Damascus. After he was converted Paul spent 3 days blind and fasting until the Lord sent Ananias to lay hands on him. It's a well known fact that Saul/Paul was a pharisee of pharisees who'd persecuted the church with a vengeance, now suddenly he was an apostle of Christ; not only that, he was an apostle to the Gentiles, this Jew of Jews. More evidence of the miraculous power of Jesus Christ-God the Son
487880
Jesus had a half brother named James.  He wrote one of the books in the bible.  There is no proof Jesus was married, that was a made up fact to promote a book and a movie.
374382
Alright all you would be Biblical scholars out there -- Paul did have 2 friends in which he was close to -- They were Aquillia who was the husband to Priscilla and they were tent makers -- Paul was a Free Roman at birth on to adult hood witch was no small matter in and of itself during that day in time -- He was raised at a Gentile (non-Jew uncircumcised) and only claimed to be Jewish in his later years from the tribe of Benjamin, from a long-established Pharisee family in Tarsus that was practically erased off the face of the earth so there was no one around to validate his claim. -- Before he became Paul he was known as Saul in the Roman Empire and carried a fair amount of status. Men of that status were automatically expected to have a wife even just for show. Usually a mutually agreed upon business arrangement between the brides father and the groom for more political power -- The wife always stayed at home while the men when away and about to deal with business. So it is commonly accepted that he did have a wife in that capacity but not a wife in the since of how we perceive them today. As for "the thorn in his side" it has been speculated on for thousands of years -- Most commonly believe that it was eye sight problems he continued to have after the blinding light of seeing the full glory of Jesus that day -- Others speculate that it was his wife calling him back home to Rome and quit his insanity with the new religion -- And some take it literally that he had some sort of kidney, bowel or internal problem -- But the truth is no one knows -- There is a lot of new information on Paul in the newly published Gnostic Gospels found with the Nag Hamani Library from the 70's -- You can find the complete Gospels and English translations on the Internet that can shed new light and a different perspective on biblical times if that's what you are looking for -- Maybe a few more facts to fill in the gaps -- Hope all this helps and please feel free to email me if you have any more questions, I'll be happy to help and share what I know --\n---Angel
676760
Paul was a person too...and people are flawed.  Judah was only one brother of 11 who sold his youngest brother to slave traders and Jesus came from his line.  It isn't our job to judge other people or allow them to alter our faith in God.  I think that if it were found that he plead guilty because he was then he was a human doing better than most humans because most wouldn't plead guilty...they would lie and try to cover up what they did.  The key to this question is the idea of repentance...we should focus on his repentance and turning from sin rather than the sin.  Being a man of God doesn't make him exempt from the human tendancy to sin...that's the name of the game when you have true faith...the temptation doesn't go away, it's how you deal with it.
997823
Sorry, I'm gonna pull a Mainworry but this answers your question better than I could have hoped for\n\nParable of the Two Sons:\n\nJesus told a story of two sons.  A father asked his first son to work in the fields, and he replied, "of course I will!"  He then went outside and changed his mind and did not work\n\nThe father asked his second son to help with the fields, and his son relied, "No!"  but later felt guilty and worked in the fields.\n\nJesus asked, "Now, which son did what was right?" and the crowd replied, "The second one!"  Jesus said, "Ah, surely prostitutes and tax collecters will enter heaven before you do".\n\nAthiests are the ones who say "No" to God, but often do what is right of their own choice.  Christians are the ones who say "Yes" to God, but then act in the opposite manner as they should.
723491
The original twekve are:\n\n Matthew, Peter, James (the Greater), John, Judas Iscariot, Andrew, Philip, Bartholomew, Thomas, James (the Lesser), Simon, and Thaddeus (Jude).\n\nMatthias was selected to replace Judas Iscariot after Jesus' death in Acts 1:16
55735
From what I read in II Samuel 21:15-22, no name is given.  It does indicate that he is either the son of Goliath or a brother of Goliath.
1017712
If you would like to find hate you can find it any where\n\nLuke 14:25-26\nLarge crowds were traveling with Jesus, and turning to them he said: "If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters-- yes even his own life-- he CANNOT be my disciple.
327058
The New Testament was finished when those who knew Jesus died off.\n\nwhen those people who knew his personally went away, the New Testament was finished. There is only one New Testament author that didn't know Christ before the Resurrection, and that was Paul. And Paul saw Jesus on the road to Damascus.\n\nSince all the authors of the New Testament knew Jesus, when those who knew him died, the book was completed.
482430
Yes and more than just James the most famous who most likely was the author of the book of James. Below is a conversation between Jesus and His brothers.\nIf you are referring to James Simon and Judas they were His disciples not brothers. This is a different James than His brother. Also there were 2 named Judas but neither were His brothers. Simon was renamed Peter by Jesus.