Is cohabitating wrong even in plutonic only relationships without marriage?
342421
Plutonic relationships are based on the formation of igneous rock.\nIf that's not a foundation for a solid relationship,\nI don't know what is.
1032486
Yes, it is very wrong......even if you werent married you should never date a customer. They will expect lifetime discounts on thier purchases if you stay with them, and if you break up, they will not even shop your store anymore. You lose all around!
731269
It's important, trust me on this one. Don't listen to the insane liberals who think that's it's not important, or that you can somehow have sex and relations without being married. They all belong in mental hospitals.\n\nTheir way has been proven to not work, yet they continue with it. They have sort of sick solution for non-marital relations, such as abortion on demand and quick fixes for STD's, ect. Now they want to waste all sorts of money on AIDS. \n\nMarriage is the institution for a man and a woman, and here a family can be formed. It all has to do with giving up selfishness and becoming responsible. \n\nNon-marital relations are just the opposite and are founded upon selfishness, lust, irresponsibliity and doing what feels good, according to the liberal code of insanity.
955066
Actually there is more sense to the question as you continue to think about it.  Love and commitment are more important than 'law'.  So without love you are can still be legally married but maybe not in a 'marriage'.  If you are sufficiently unhappy then you probably shouldn't maintain the sham of a marriage.  Divorce isn't something to be taken lightly and all efforts should be made to preserve the marriage assuming you would like to preserve it.
955131
I have no arguments against the right of two consenting adults to live together, love & support each other and have a happy life.\n\nIsn't this what everyone wants?
639587
as long as you are both of legal age, then yes there is nothing wrong with having a relationship with anyone, no matter what age. good luck.
7360
Depends on the circumstances. I am not relationship pro but thre are certainly instances where there is not other logical choice. Not supporting them, however, is not cool....
173953
Not neccesarily. Relationships where both parties share the same religion tend to last longer than relationships where one person is religious and the other is not or relationships where each has a different religion (or even denomination).
218488
I am not married, but I wouldn't stay married out of convenience. Instead, I would try to make the marriage work. I would try to identify exactly which of my needs (and my partner's needs) are not being met and how to fix them. I take marriage vows extremely seriously. I would never tell someone I would be with them until death do us part, for better or worse, unless I truly meant it.
318861
Ugh. I hate the terms "moral" and "immoral" because of their current connotation. I really prefer "right" and "wrong," so I'm going to use those instead. I also don't really believe in marriage, but that's another story.\n\nAdultery is wrong because it, presumably, shows a lack of empathy towards one's significant other. If a couple are "swingers," and want to engage in mutual adultery with no hard feelings, I have no problem with that. For regular folks, though, I see it as breaking a promise and disregarding the feelings of someone you, presumably, care about. So, I feel that it is wrong.
225494
Not at  all. But if, you begin to ponder this while dating some one perhaps, you should stay single. Monagamous relationships are not for everyone and just for those who are mature to hande it.
538294
Yes. Otherwise, couples would go their seperate ways when things got hard, instead of making it work. Marriage is a rational decision you make to be with 1 person, even if it gets hard. Think about a world full of broken homes, with only one parent. That would be reality without marriage.
1111497
Its worse to enter into an monogamous marriage just for the sole purpose of lust! Marriage is special and great; to get married just for the sole purpose of getting into their pants is wrong. But sleeping around is just as bad to me, but if you were gonna do anything, you should just sleep around but I wouldn't even do that!
734369
According to Catholicism, anyway, it is certainly possible to marry the wrong person.  Problem is, you promised to be faithful 'for better or worse, till death do us part.'  In other words, thank God for your blessings, ask His help, and make the best of your marriage.  If your spouse dies, then you may of course remarry.  If your spouse is still living, then yes, it is adultury.  As for heaven or hell, that's up to God and not me.
1018770
Does a relationship have to be justifeid by sex?
580114
Live & let live is what I say. Everyone should be allowed to do whatever pleases them with regard to relationships, as long as you are both consenting adults, it's none of anyone else's business!
99162
No. If the marriage is legal - and both parties enter into the marriage willingly and are of marriageable age, the occupations of the two people are irrelevant. It may very well be immoral for a teacher and student to form a romantic relationship during the time the teaching/learning/grading is going on. This is against school policy everywhere I've heard of. I don't think the Judeo-Christian religious texts refer to it as a sin.