what does fopje flauw mopje mean?
337274
don't know what fopje means but the other words mean \nFlauw means stupid or dull \nmopje means joke\n\nso its something stupid joke(s)\n\nhang on friend just told me means something like - 'little fools tell insipid jokes'
578919
Everyone is wrong except the guy who said it was from Anglo-Saxon.  "F..k" has a long pedigree in the Germanic languages.  It was found in Proto-Germanic about 2500 years ago as the verb *fukan 'have intercourse'.  This was not vulgar at that time and was a euphemism for some older word.  Ultimately, it comes from Proto-Indo-European *pug- "to strike", from which we get the borrowed Latin form pugilism 'boxing'.
672548
Who are you, laugh_out_loud ?\nWere did you get that sentence from?\nGood dutch spelling !\n\n\nOK. Here's the translation : \n\nWELKOM TERUG! HIER EEN PAAR KUSJES TERWIJL IK U OMARM MET EEN WARME, INNIGE, EN ONWEERSTAANBARE OMHELSING!\n\nI'm flemish.\n;-)
274739
Middle English, from Middle French flaor, flavor, from (assumed) Vulgar Latin flator, alteration of Latin flatus breath, act of blowing
395659
The f-word is actually latin.  Deriving the etymology of this word is difficult, because it's been a taboo for most of its existence and citations are rare. The earliest known use, according to American Heritage and Lighter, predates 1500 and is from a poem written in a mix of Latin and English and entitled Flen flyys. The relevant line reads:\n\n    Non sunt in celi quia fuccant uuiuys of heli.\n\nTranslated:\n\n    They [the monks] are not in heaven because they f*** the wives of Ely [a town near Cambridge].\n\nFuccant is a pseudo-Latin word and in the original it is written in cipher to further disguise it.\n\nSome sources cite an alleged use from 1278 as a personal name, John le F***er, but this citation is questionable. No one has properly identified the document this name supposedly appears in and even if it is real, the name is likely a variant of fuker, a maker of cloth, fulcher, a soldier, or another similar word.\n\nThe most popular origin, however is INCORRECT is that it's beleived to have originated around the 15th century in either the English, Dutch, or low-German language.  The word's first definition appeared in 1967 when an underground newspaper called the East Village Other published this version in 1967:\n\n    "It's not commonly known that the word "f***" originated as a medical diagnostic notation on the documests of soldiers in the British Imperial Army. When a soldier reported sick and was found to have V.D., the abbreviation F.U.C.K. was stamped on his documents. It was short for "Found Under Carnal Knowledge." \n\nAnother theory suggests that in ancient England single people could not have sex unless they had consent of the king. When people wanted to have a baby, they had to get the consent of the king, and the king gave them a placard that they hung on their door while they were having sex. The placard had F. U. C. K. (Fornication Under Consent of the King) on it.\n\nHowever, other stories past down through the years tells a different side of things.  In Christianized Anglo-Saxon Britain, invading kings would require that their troops would rape the women in a common demoralization procedure. Because fornication was against religious law, the rapists needed special religious permission, from the king.  Pretty grusome stuff...\n\nSome more interesting theories about the word can be found at the sites below.
32323
It is Welsh and I think it means 'stupid','emptyheaded', 'not all there",etc.\n\nI am a saesneg,but from my sojourns I think the literal translation is 'not a full yard'.\n\nOur ocker mates would say 'a sixpack short of a barbie'!
821370
F**k is an English word which, when used literally as a verb, means "to engage in sexual intercourse". It is generally considered to be an offensive profanity. Its origins may be Germanic, akin to the synonymous German "ficken", which had the original meaning, "to strike".\n\nIt is unclear whether the word has always been considered vulgar, and if not, when it first started to be considered vulgar. Some evidence indicates that in some English-speaking locales it was considered acceptable as late as the 17th century meaning "to strike" or "to penetrate". Other evidence indicates that it may have become vulgar as early as the 16th century in England, although neither set of evidence is inherently contradictory to the other, since many words have multiple connotations. The etymology (origin) of the word is uncertain.\n\nThere are several urban-legend false etymologies postulating an acronymic origin for the word. One legend holds that the word f**k came from Irish law. If a couple were caught committing adultery they would be punished "For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge In the Nude", with "F U C K I N'" written on the stocks above them to denote the crime.
785667
It means Gazelle\n\nThe name is the Afrikaans / Dutch spelling of the word rhebok, a type of African antelope or gazelle.
1063850
All that I can find is that it is a colloq. word that means dirty  as ab adjective  or pig, hog as a noun.  I don't see any precaution you know, other than the obvious that it is a vulgar word.  Useages differ from one group to another of Spainish speaker so...
360226
A f a g g o t or fagot is a bundle of sticks or branches, usually meant for use as firewood,\n\nThere is a famous quote:\nWhat fool hath added water to the sea, \nOr brought a faggot to bright-burning Troy? \n—William Shakespeare, Titus Andronicus, Act II, scene III \n\nfaggot is also a derogatory slang term for a homosexual or "unmanly" male
650024
뭘봐 (mwohl bwah) literally  means "what are you looking at?" and it's a pretty rude way to ask, unless it's a very close friend.\nnormally, people don't tend to ask this question, unless they're asking about a specific object you might be looking at.\nif someone thinks you're staring at them, instead of saying "what are you looking at" they're more likely to say\n왜? (way)\nwhich literally means "why" but it's used in this way.
920079
It's an apartment that's not on the ground floor.\n\nboven = up, top, upstairs, ...\nwoning = house, home, place, ...\n\nThe term is only used in Holland, not in Belgium\n\n[edit]:\nBenedenwoning would be the opposite: you'd get (part) of the ground floor.
479382
Sorry, I couldn't find the meaning anywhere but I guess it's an abbreviation of some sort.\nSome 5-6 years ago there were these really stupid toys called Furby and they made a sound just like that "wurrrrrrv". It's also like the sound a cat makes when you stroke her chin.
1016240
It means "Happy Birthday", but I would think it could well be Yiddish.\n\nHmm, I found "freylekhn geburtstog"....
233867
it's a German word meaning something like, little munchkin.
335864
Some of the words given by bmwdriver above aren't right. \n\nA foot path isn't a sidewalk; the right word is pavement.  Foot path is just a right of way for pedestrians only, i.e. no horses or vehicles.\n\nJersey is a particular type of sweater; the generic term is "jumper".\n\nPiss is most definitely not beer (though if you've been told this, it is probably a British person's opinion of American beer).  We use "beer" as well.  Piss is urine, though "pissed" is drunk, not angry and "On the piss" is going out for a session of heavy drinking.  "Taking the piss" is making a fool of someone or having them on.\n\nShag isn't sex itself, it's a verb meaning to have sex.\n\nThe usual ones that cause amusement are:\n\nBritish pants = US underwear (though we say that as well)\nBritish trousers = US pants\nBritish fanny = US <censored by Yahoo>, but put it this way, British fannies are female only and round the front, not the back.\n\nFor far more answers to this question than will fit here, see the link below, which has a searchable US/UK equivalents dictionary.\n\nOh, and to answer the second half of the question:\n\nBugger is gay penetrative sex (verb) or someone who practises it (noun) and derives from "Bulgarians", who were (falsely) accused of such practices in the middle ages.   It's strength as an expletive has declined over the years and so it would not be unusual to hear "Bugger me!" as an exclamation of surprise (and not an invitation) or to hear someone described as "He's a rum bugger", without any implication of sexual orientation.  You won't hear it in polite company though.\n\nBloody is a fits-anywhere mild expletive.  It derives from the original expression "By Our Lady" (i.e. swearing by the virgin Mary), but I don't think a lot of people are really aware of that today.  It can be inserted more or less anywhere in a sentence that f***ing might be, but isn't anywhere near as unacceptable.  Again, not really for use in polite society though.
347876
brillig---- it means 4 o'clock. t'was brillig and the slithy toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe. all mimsy were the borogoves and the mome raths aoutgrabe. beware the jabberwock my son, the jaws that bite the claws that catch, beware the jubjub bird and shun the frumious bandersnatch. he took his vorpal sword in hand long time the manxome foe he sought, so rested he by the tumtum tree and stood awhile in thought. and as in uffish thought he stood the jabberwock with eyes of flame came whiffling through the tulgey wood and burbled as it came. one, two, and trough and through his vorpal blade went snickersnack! he cut it dead and with his head he came galumphing back. has thou slain the jabberwock? come to my arms my beamish boy! oh frabjous day, callooh! callay! he chortled in his joy. t'was brillig and the slithy toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe. all mimsy were the borogoves and the mome raths outgrabe