Which DC superhero's character would have gotten more justice in the Marvel Universe? (see details)?
338058
That is a really cool question!\n\nI think that Aquaman would have been handled better had marvel created him.marvel can take some of the craziest notions for a superhero or villain and make it cool and believable. think about captain america. his costume isn't the coolest out there, but marvel makes him seem awesome. another good example is the rhino. he looks ridculous, but he is made to be a really powerful and intimidating foe. marvel could have taken aquaman and made him cool. they would have given him a better costume and probably gave him some additional powers. namor, the sub mariner is the best proof of this. he is an awesome character who is similar to aquaman. they have really made him into one tough guy.\n\nI beleive that dc has some really good characters. batman is charcterized the best in my opnion. I also like Wonder Woman. But some of their villains are too one dimensional.\n\nwhat i'd really like to see is marvel take Superman and rejuvenate this character.\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namor
13562
Don't forget Darkseid- he's also one tough hombre.  Lobo has also beaten him.  Batman can also kick his butt (if he's prepared for it!)...
805287
Batman. Strictly on talent, whereas everyone has a super power
1060810
I'm sorry but this is a majorly lopsided fight. You just got Storm blown to atoms. Take a guy with the genius to rival Reed Richards and Dr Doom at the same time ( he did) and give him the powers of Prof X, Magneto, and the Phoenix force at the same time and you think Storm can handle that? No freaking way. This guy would beat the snot out of Onslaught by himself, never mind poor Storm.
268868
There's Rhodes - you may know him as War Machine (Iron Man), there's Spawn, there's Luke Cage (Power Man), there's Black Panther, there's Bishop of the X-men, there's Storm of the X-men, there's Shadowhawk (of Image Comics), there's the Green Lantern and Blade and a few others I can't think of off the top of my head.  Good hunting!
1184482
batman all the way man....he is cool, not like  those over-exagerated powers like superman...lol
993982
I think Robin Hood did a wrong thing (stealing) for a right reason (helping the poor and to correct injustice).\nDoing a right thing for a wrong reason could be when Lex Luthor does things for charity to impress Clark Kent.  Or when he invents a cure just for the money or power of having it.
599380
My feeling is that the writers and editors at DC deliberately leave this "who's richer" question open, precisely because they don't want to encourage the kind of continuity-obsessed fact-checking that boxes good writers into a corner when all they're trying to do is tell fun stories about guys & girls in tights. \n\nIf we're talking net worth, though, I would argue Lex Luthor is the more wealthier of the two. He's older than Wayne, so he's had more time to amass his wealth (which he started doing at a very young age, according to current bio), and I would say he's a lot less picky how he makes his money, meaning he would be more likely to get into the big defense contracts and other ethically queasy industries than someone like Bruce Wayne. \n\nAs for power... again, I have to hand it to Lex. Remember, "Bruce Wayne" is just the facade that Batman uses to carry on a day-to-day life; it differs from writer to writer, but Bruce is usually portrayed as a playboy... someone who likes making money, but isn't too concerned about using it to further his power. Image is everything, so I wouldn't be surprised if most people in the DC universe see Bruce Wayne as a Donald Trump type -- rich and powerful in his own circles, but hardly someone that inspires fear or rumours of political office. \n\n(btw, there's a really fun JLA story -- can't remember the exact issue off the top of my head -- where Batman gets one of Luthor's gang members to betray him simply by upping the villain's asking price, a plot point later used in a Justice League cartoon. Just goes to show money can't buy happiness, but it sure can rent it for a while.) \n\nJust for fun, check out the link below. Forbes magazine does an annual "Fictional Fifteen" where it lists the estimated wealth of fictional billionaires. Lex Luthor ($10.1 billion) came in fourth after Santa Claus, Daddy Warbucks and Richie Rich; Bruce Wayne ($6.5 billion) came in eighth, just beating out the millionaire from Gilligan's Island.
297313
his powers were better than the other super heroes.  plus, i think the creators of the comic book figures sort of voted amongst themselves to have one invincible super hero.
1045519
although there are some movies on black superheroes, but i agree that whites are more preferred. i think there should be a movie on Static.
418761
I agree with bungiebabe, unless I was feeling heroic that day.\nThen, I would unleash fists of fury on the perps, bringing justice home like my buddy the punisher, and try to ditch spider-man so he didn't tie me up with legal jargon.
718996
Superman. He's smarter, faster and stronger, he can fly and has heat ray vision and some other nifty powers.\nI don't know why people think that Spiderman's smarter.\nYes, Spidey's a scientist. But Superman is Kryptonian, and even a regular Kryptonian would be a supergenius on Earth.\nAnd Kal-El's dad was THE most brilliant man on Krypton and that intelligence was inherited.\nSo unless Spiderman through some really unlikely turn of events, got his hands on some Kryptonite, he wouldn't stand a chance.
1180785
I don't like Superman. I think he's lame, I mean, what's the point if he can just do EVERYTHING. Now, the Green-Lantern, that's my fave. I feel bad for him, no one likes that guy.
432402
clark kent.. the nice guy with the bad boy hidden side :)
1169989
Superman probably, seeing as a few Romans were able to kill Jesus first time round.  But he'd be back in a couple o days for a rematch.
676064
Awesome fight dude!\n\nI say Galactus! Galactus frickin' eats planets for breakfast. He has to be a little more powerful than Thanos!\n\nThanos will put up a fireworks show but, when Galacty gets angry and his eyes start burning, Thanos would be crushed like a fly!
823271
Avengers by a LONG shot.\n\nany one of the big three could take out superman. No correct that, any ONE of the avengers could take out superman. Ant man and wasp, as corny as they are could just fly into his ear and rip him apart from the inside- he is defenseless.\n\nThat leaves green lantern and martian manhunter.\n\nWhile Iron Man's original suit pales in comparison to his power now (he could likely handle the original justice league by himself pretty easily post Extremis storyline), it is made of yellow. Green lantern is ineffective against him.\n\nThat would leave either thor or the hulk to take out martian manhunter, best bet would be to use thor because of his godlike status and hulk could likely be mind controlled to becoming bruce banner, thus taking him out of the fight.\n\nThe flash vs the hulk? The flash is an annoying personality to begin with, what happens when that adds to the fact that the hulk is a no contest match in favor of the hulk to begin with, flash's best bet would be to run away as far and fast as possible and hope hulk doesn't land on him when he jumps after him. \n\nThe last is aqua man and black canary. This is not the aquaman of today, but the aquaman of way back when when basically all he did was talk to fish and black canary,  both of these are a non-issue. leaving wasp or ant man would take out one, and the other marvel heroes would have handily dispatched thier dc counterpart (except possibly thor, because mm can run and hide longer) to handle a human black canary or weakling aquaman.