How are Japanese and Chinese sooo intelligent?
342203
From what I understand it's because they take education very seriously over there.  I heard that once that some children study for hours at a time.  They spend most of their adolescence studying to get into a university.
287949
im not sure but have some information that might be helpful for u\n China , as everyone knows Chines r too fast in technolgy,so they must b using computers and thier populations is up to 1.1 billion\nand than INDIA,, indian r too fast in software,and whole the world knows about it.and they cant b doing software well without a computer, right,a nd Indian`s populations was very near to 1 billion in 1997,maybe now its 1 billion\nand the 3rd u can consider USA,,the whole states of america..:-? right
306229
"Chinese" is not a genetic distinction, it's a geographical one.  The people in China are a mixture of countless smaller groups and tribes of people, with the expected large number of recessive genes.  Hair and eye color does change over time, as different genes are expressed differentially based on age-related regulation of transcription factors.  You are just at one end of a typical bell-shaped curve for these specific traits.
484723
yeah! i think you're better than japanese.
477058
I'm a Westerner married to a Chinese lady. Yes, they love blue eyes but don't think just because you have blue eyes they will be falling at your feet. Asian women are damn smart and have great integrity.
672091
the chinese people mostly have very little eyes\nthe japanese(i think,)own the medium small eyes(and,it's perfect for me!!!>0<)\nthe korean owns the wider,but still,they got small eyes..^_^\n\nfor the writing,\nchinese writings are bit hard to known(w'little space)\njapanese is simpler(I could write my name by japanese!!^0^(coz' it's very simple!!huhuhu)\nthe koreans are simpler too,but still,it's a bit hard to known..
1097695
Japanese are closely related to Koreans (though they don't admit that) Koreans are a kin to the Chinese, The Chinese have links to India, Russia, and the middle east.\n\nWorking outward:  Japanese have populated Okinawa, Okinawa has plenty of links to the southeast island such as the Philippines.  The Filipinos are culturally and genetically related to the Spainards and Americans.  \n\nFrom the view point of eastern time Japan is 13 hours ahead.  So if it's 11:30 pm eastern time here, then it's 12:30 in the afternoon of the next day in Japan!
431127
All girls are Awesome, but many Oriental girls do have a certain uniqueness about them, for example: Most Chinese girls are very intelligent, polite, healthy, hard working, and very attractive.
271276
The average IQ of all the races together? that doesn't make sense, if the asians, that are most of the world have a 20% higher IQ...
721130
China - so many people they'll have so many people with so many different skill, ideas for technology, and intelligense. The perfect dictatorship
707830
I think that most Asian people naturally do better than other groups because they are taught from birth to be better and work harder than others.  It's part of their culture to want to succeed.  As for being naturally smarter, I don't think that's true.  It's just a matter of living up to your god-given potential.
1119212
Well they are definately smarter.  Thats for sure
674452
All the Chinese you need to know is here:\nhttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AoJpSjLiaDMr172Ptrz7uBnsy6IX?qid=1006052013067
453310
hahaha\njapanese is definitely NOT easier to learn than chinese.\nto a native english speaker, korean and japanese are the most difficult languages to learn in the world.\nwith a name like "yooni" i'm assuming that maybe you're korean?  if that's so, and you know some korean, then japanese grammar is almost identical to korean grammar, but the vocabulary is completely different.\non the other hand, again based off of korean, because korean has so much chinese-based vocabulary, learning hanja is actually pretty easy, because it's logical and makes sense for the most part.  plus, chinese has very little grammar at all.  while the characters will make it a little more difficult to learn how to read, you can be speaking chinese with a bit of fluency in no time.  \nbut remember, japanese has three ways of writing, and the main one is pure chinese characters (or variants thereof).  so, whether you learn japanese or chinese, you'll still have to memorize all that hanja.\n\nyour parents are right.  according to all major economists, japan is sinking in the international community, and china and korea are rising.  i strongly suggest learning either chinese or korean.\nhowever, if you *really* want to learn japanese, go ahead.  i don't see much benefit in japanese other than to read japanese literature.
1100311
Its an argument against AI.\n\nIn simplcity it is saying understanding does not come from memorizing.  Another way to put it is that grammar does not come from vocabulary.  If you learn all the words, doesn't imply you know WHAT someone "means".\n\nHow does this pertain to intelligence? Glad you asked.\n\nSuppose that, many years from now, we have constructed a computer which behaves as if it understands Chinese. In other words, the computer takes Chinese characters as input, consults a large look-up table (as all computers can be described as doing), and then produces other Chinese characters as output. Suppose that this computer performs this task so convincingly that it easily passes the Turing test. In other words, it convinces a human Chinese speaker that it is a Chinese speaker. All the questions the human asks are responded to appropriately, such that the Chinese speaker is convinced that he or she is talking to another Chinese speaker. The conclusion proponents of strong AI would like to draw is that the computer understands Chinese, just as the person does.\n\nNow, Searle asks us to suppose that he is sitting inside the computer. In other words, he is in a small room in which he receives Chinese characters, looks them up on look-up table, and returns the Chinese characters that are indicated by the table. Searle notes, of course, that he doesn't understand a word of Chinese. Furthermore, his lack of understanding goes to show, he argues, that computers don't understand Chinese either, because they are in the same situation as he is. They are mindless manipulators of symbols, just as he is - and they don't understand what they're 'saying', just as he doesn't.
213461
Hell no! lol..I'm Chinese and the highest level of math I took in high school was Pre-calculus and it was tough for me.  I took college algebra and I only got a C in the class.  If anything, I think the Koreans are best in math lol  jk  Bad stereotype.
662223
Probably \n- 90% is Japanese.\n- Nearly 100% of them speaks Japanese.