what was the new labor system that started the cotton growing again?
347448
It was called "triangular comerce". It involved slavery, rhum and cotton.\n\nShips would buy cotton from the souther States before the civil war, trade part of it for rhum in the carabean and set sail to Europe, where they sold the rest. After, they would set sail to Africa to get slavs in exchange for some rhum and money and go back to Southern United Stated to trade it all for cotton and the cicle continued.
139888
It greatly increased cotton production in the South and cotton manufacturing in the North. The cotton gin increased slave work production, almost by fifty fold! The North was and still is the manufacturing megaplex, so the mills and textile factories were tremendously affected. Last but simply not least was slavery, as the Whites didn't expect the Blacks to sit on their rears and watch them. This had an adverse effect on most states, clearly showing in the end not all inventions are perfect.
141735
George Washington grew hemp on his plantation for clothing and for rope.  hemp being similar to pot, i thought i'd mention it.
727301
Old Labour means Taxation, New Labour means More Taxation.
178013
Slave labor and barter goods.
90053
There are entire books on this subject, so I'm not going to get too detailed.\n\nThe practice of slavery was an issue left up to individual states.  The states in the Southern region chose slavery because their economies were largely agrarian.  They produced raw goods like cotton.  The states in the Northern region were primarily industrial.  They produced finished goods, which meant they had less of a need for slave labor.\n\nWhen the country started spreading to the West, the Southern states assumed the new territories would be able to vote individually on the slavery issue.  The federal government, which tended to sympathize with the more developed Northern states, decided that it should be the one to assign 'slave' or 'non-slave' status as each new state was recognized.  The idea that individual states would no longer have the power to determine their own policies was objectionable to Southern representatives in Congress.  They voted to secede from the Union in order to preserve the rights of individual states.  The federal government desperately wanted to keep the supply states and the manufacturing states together for economic strength.\n\nIt's easy to portray the Southern cause as immoral, but in reality the number of large plantations with large slave populations was minimal.  The majority of Southerners were no more racist than Northerners.  The federal government eventually prevailed through superior firepower, not superior morality.
340397
cheap labor, \nneed for workers on plantations, \nit was very profitable.
213664
This really depends on where and what societal class you are talking about. However in Europe, society was basically divided into three sections, known as the First, Second, and Third Estate. The First Estate consisted of the nobility. The nobility were extremely rich and had enormous political power. They oversaw the elections and appiontments of the clergy, the Second Estate. The Second Estate were also relativly wealthy but not as wealthy as the First Estate. They also had less political power and the power they did have, they vested into bidding the will of the First Estate in order to retain their power. Lastly, the Third Estate consisted of merchants, artisans, and esstentially the commoners. They were substantially less wealthy but consisted of largest portion of the population. They had little political power despite their vast numbers. Unlike the First or Second Estate, the Third Estate was subject to the most taxes and worked the longest hours.\n\nAs for life in North America, the United States had recently won their independence (1776) and the citizens were eager to assert their independence. Like in Europe, large social divisions marked the American society. At the top of society were the wealthy plantation owners. These people mainly lived in the south because thats where the most profitable crops (cotton and tobacco) grew readily. The middle class mainly lived in the North which in the early 19th century, was relativly undeveloped. At the bottom of the social order were the slaves. They had little or no independence. However, in the mid-19th, tensions between pro-slavery states in the south and anti-slavery states in the north exploded into the Civil War. During the war, the north became more and more industrialized, giving the north a comparative advantage in the war. At the end of the war, slaves were granted their freedom, but that did not mean that they moved up socially. Towards the end of the 19th centruy, the industrial revolution drastically changed the landscape of the American society. Workers were able to produce more in less time. More and more blue-collar workers began moving to the more industrialized north. They worked long tiresome hours. Minimum wage was nonexistant was were any work regulations. Child labor was heavily prevelant. However, women were not accepted into the workplace on a large scale until later in the 20th century.
657819
well, the farmer's union started when a bunch of farmers got together and said 'hey, let's start a union'! LOL\nSeriously, though, the farmer's union idea is not new, and there's good info at this website.
649092
Are you actually asking what farming techniques have changed since people were digging in the ground with stones to today's modern methods?  \n\nThis is the subject of an entire book, not something that can be answered on Yahoo Answers!\n\nYou can go to www.wikipedia.org and type in "farming", that's about as much help as I can give you without quitting my job and doing this full-time!
296181
Plantations were dominant in the South because it required lots of labor, which is taken from slaves.\n\nThe leading crop was obviously cotton
580983
Today there are old books on line because the copy wright has expired and many are being typed in a web site for all to read free. The farm as we know it was just emerging for the common man from life as a serf tied to the land owner. Many farmers in Europe were just allowed to use a piece of land. In New France some came out and claimed land just by marking it in an area protected by their soldiers. There is an amazing story of a French group being sold land on the  Ohio River that was totally undeveloped. The immigrants were all from down town Paris and were used to working one job for the aristocracy. When they had spent all their savings and traveled by ship and land to the river location they found huge trees and wonderful soil. Without proper tools they chopped tree after tree and then hollowed them out for a home. Animals and fish were obtained anyway they could. Gunpowder was there but scarce. The will to live away from the crazy Kings in Europe and the many wars allowed the spirit of the pioneers to be totally awesome. They stayed until a farm was made. The Louisiana French were taken by the English army and forced to beg among the New England colonies one winter . Life was never safe anywhere.
498655
the economic status of the south allowed for industrial speculators to move in and increase the size of industrial manufacturies. Labor was cheap, people needed to eat. Slavery being abolished also meant that the labor force was decreased (whites now had to work for themselves).\n\nThe market went from agraian (many people producing much food) to industrial (few people roducing most of the nations food.) This meant jobs went from agriculture to industry.
302805
38. Poulson's American Daily Advertiser (Philadelphia newspaper, with interesting articles) April 21, 1836 -- INVENTION BY A NEGRO - A patent given to 29 year-old Henry Blair of Maryland, a free colored man, for a Corn Planter machine now on exhibit at the Capitol - description of process - Blair thinks it will save the labor of eight men - he is adapting the machine for use with cotton. [NOTE: Henry Blair was the only inventor to be identified in the Patent Office records as "a colored man." Blair was born in Montgomery County, Maryland around 1807. He received a patent on October 14, 1834 for a seed planter and a patent in 1836 for a cotton planter. Henry Blair was the second black inventor to receive a patent the first was Thomas Jennings who received a patent in 1821 for a dry cleaning process. Henry Blair signed his patents with an "x" because he could not write. Henry Blair died in 1860.].\n\nImage is available at:\n\nhttp://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:f0WcIWy2gEYMlM:www.library.georgetown.edu\n\nhttp://inventors.about.com/od/blackinventors/ig/African-American-Inventors-/Henry-Blair----X8447.htm\n\nhttp://www.twinlakes.k12.in.us/info/library/connection/inventor.html\n\nmng.1432@gmail.com
824513
Industrialization born out of necessities.  Population has grown and demand  for commodities as well.  Families working together makes more time in working in other fields and thus having an ample time at each other.  Opportunities grew also fused by competition.  Education and knowledge has become imperative in the industry.  People then became self sufficient.  The society is still there the same, what changed is the culture.
621487
Through slavery and Cotton plantations. There was a great migration to Texas for homesteading in 1825-35 when Texas was still a part of Mexico. The Mexican President invited homesteading, and promoted slavery, for Cotton production, and thousands of Americans from South Carolina and Georgia moved there with there slaves to own larger plantations. That was the major growth of the area, and the reason. The Alamo was a result of Mexican taxation to the plantation owners of the Cotton fields.
595733
Any new innovations may have created new jobs.  Guilds.  other than that I have no clue. sorry.