how was imperialism,nationalism,and milatiralism causes of the war?
342036
Helpful references below.\n\nNow go do the work by reading these articles and using your brain!
956682
Power is the impetus for war.\nReligion, land, politics...are the fall guys for power mongers.
206818
In World War I, the six major powers were set against each other. At the time, the US was an isolationist (which means that we didn't want to get involved in European affairs) There was a lot of nationalism in the countries, and each country built up their armies. Russia, France, and Britain against Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. Noone expected it to cause as many causualties as it did, but since each nation was so powerful, it did. The troops were in trenches, (trench warfare) for several years. At the time, they had machine guns, and the only way to advance was to cross the area between the trenches called "No man's land" When they crossed no man's land, they were mowed down with machine guns. So the generals, instead of looking for other methods, chose instead to send more troops, causing more casualties.
106566
I’m getting too old, I can’t believe anyone would need to ask such a question.\nWorld War I, 1914–18, also known as the Great War, conflict, chiefly in Europe, among most of the great Western powers. It was the largest war the world had yet seen.Causes \nWorld War I was immediately precipitated by the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist in 1914. There were, however, many factors that had led toward war. Prominent causes were the imperialistic, territorial, and economic rivalries that had been intensifying from the late 19th cent., particularly among Germany, France, Great Britain, Russia, and Austria-Hungary.\nOf equal importance was the rampant spirit of nationalism, especially unsettling in the empire of Austria-Hungary and perhaps also in France. Nationalism had brought the unification of Germany by blood and iron, and France, deprived of Alsace and Lorraine by the Franco-Prussian War of 1870–71, had been left with its own nationalistic cult seeking revenge against Germany. While French nationalists were hostile to Germany, which sought to maintain its gains by militarism and alliances, nationalism was creating violent tensions in the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy; there the large Slavic national groups had grown increasingly restive, and Serbia as well as Russia fanned Slavic hopes for freedom and Pan-Slavism.\nImperialist rivalry had grown more intense with the new imperialism of the late 19th and early 20th cent. The great powers had come into conflict over spheres of influence in China and over territories in Africa, and the Eastern Question, created by the decline of the Ottoman Empire, had produced several disturbing controversies. Particularly unsettling was the policy of Germany. It embarked late but aggressively on colonial expansion under Emperor William II, came into conflict with France over Morocco, and seemed to threaten Great Britain by its rapid naval expansion.\nThese issues, imperialist and nationalist, resulted in a hardening of alliance systems in the Triple Alliance and Triple Entente and in a general armaments race. Nonetheless, a false optimism regarding peace prevailed almost until the onset of the war, an optimism stimulated by the long period during which major wars had been avoided, by the close dynastic ties and cultural intercourse in Europe, and by the advance of industrialization and economic prosperity. Many Europeans counted on the deterrent of war's destructiveness to preserve the peace.\nWar's Outbreak \nThe Austrian annexation (1908) of Bosnia and Hercegovina created an international crisis, but war was avoided. The Balkan Wars (1912–13) remained localized but increased Austria's concern for its territorial integrity, while the solidification of the Triple Alliance made Germany more yielding to the demands of Austria, now its one close ally. The assassination (June 28, 1914) of Archduke Francis Ferdinand at Sarajevo set in motion the diplomatic maneuvers that ended in war.\nThe Austrian military party, headed by Count Berchtold, won over the government to a punitive policy toward Serbia. On July 23, Serbia was given a nearly unacceptable ultimatum. With Russian support assured by Sergei Sazonov, Serbia accepted some of the terms but hedged on others and rejected those infringing upon its sovereignty. Austria-Hungary, supported by Germany, rejected the British proposal of Sir Edward Grey (later Lord Grey of Fallodon) and declared war (July 28) on Serbia.\nRussian mobilization precipitated a German ultimatum (July 31) that, when unanswered, was followed by a German declaration of war on Russia (Aug. 1). Convinced that France was about to attack its western frontier, Germany declared war (Aug. 3) on France and sent troops against France through Belgium and Luxembourg. Germany had hoped for British neutrality, but German violation of Belgian neutrality gave the British government the pretext and popular support necessary fo
947675
Type these words into the search engine of your choice.\n\nWorld War Two.\n\nIf you can ask that question on here you can do your own homework. Stop being so lazy.
614521
Nope. War is caused by greed, too. Religion is often (though not always) just the excuse given to make the people go along with it. Greed will never go away. \n\nHate comes from differences. Human nature is to fear differences. There are more differences among the peoples of the earth than just religion. Race is one that comes to mind.
370104
the different ethnic groups wanted their own countries (nationalism), so they fought each other to gain land to make their unique ethnic countries.
397421
There are 4 primary causes of the US civil war (I'm assuming this is the one you want).\n\n1.  federalism--favouring a strong centralized government as opposed to strong state governments.\n2.  slavery\n3. expansionism--extending control into new territory\n4.  sectionalism--blind focus on the interest of a section or region instead of the whole.
390631
Religion used to be the number one cause, but now I think it's more likely National interest, i.e. protecting ones resources (oil etc), or political reasons, or simply a desire to divert attention from problems at home - a successful war will always instill a sense of national pride e.g. the UK went to war with Argentina in the 1980's and that created an immense sense of National Pride and won an election for the Conservatives, while at home unemployment was rising etc.
851659
The immediate Causes of World War II are generally held to be the German invasion of Poland, and the Japanese attacks on China, the United States, and the British and Dutch colonies. In each of these cases, the attacks were the result of a decision made by authoritarian ruling elites in Germany and Japan. World War II started after these aggressive actions were met with an official declaration of war, armed resistance or both.
205385
They were out numbered for one by the triple entente, militarism was another, along with Industrialization, and nationalism. the triple entente was an alliance between three big countries, militarism was all of the weapons, industrialization was the advanced weapons and other sources, and nationalism was ones love for their country enabling them to fight for it.
123595
Imperialism happens when a dominant country invades another country (through physical and cultural force) and restructures the economic/social/cultural function of its people; new imperialism or second-wave imperialism happens when an invaded country then invades another--or when the invaded country returns to invade the original, dominant country (as is happening culturally when American pop culture affects British culture)
995395
In the modern age it was British proto capitalism that paved the way for the US and the other great powers to scramble for resources in the name of nationalist greed. Unfortunately for Britain WWI and WWII doomed the empire and all that is left of their legacy is that of their language which is spoken by most of the world.
927359
This sounds like a homework question to me. Sorry, I won't help you. I feel you need to read BOTH and you come up with the answer. You need to know these things.\n\nI will tell you this. The North distorted the truth about the Civil War or War between the States.  The war was NOT fought because of slavery. The north had slaves too. They were fighting over textiles, cotton, land, resources it was all economic.
37745
As stated above Nationalism isn't a political system. It is an attitude or political philosophy that can drive a government. While nationalistic tendancies can manifest in a post war situation, it is more present in pre-war situations. The most obvious example would be the rise in nationalist policies in Germany and Russia before WWII. After WWI the world community put harsh sanctions on Germany as punishment for causing the war. This led Germans to feel resentment to the rest of the world as their economy was in ruin and their military growth was extremely regulated. This climate allowed a leader like Hitler to rise. Hitlerwas able to tap in to the anti global community feelings of the Germans. They became attracted to his rhetoric of the return of the strong German empire and called for Germans to become a world dominating super power that would last 1000 years. Another example would be the actions and attitudes of the small Balkin countries pre WWI\nYou can also see nationalist tendancies in the American foriegn policy immediately after 9/11. Our feelings were that we needed to care for our own national interestes above those of the world as a whole. This is evident in the pre-emptive strike in Iraq despite foriegn power objection. Rightfully or wrongfully so, our government took actions that (as argued) had our national interests in mind.
807013
OPPRESSION and GREED is the MAIN reason for CONFLICT.
966649
Imperialism has been around since the beginning of time. And will continue as long as one nation is more powerful than its neighbors. \n   The reason? Resources, influence, human nature? Hate?