which is the best OS(operating system) for security?
338271
I would also sa a MAC OS is more secured aside from the fact that their security software was develop by UNIX there are lesser virus, worms, bugs, etc that are intended for a MAC because it only comprise about 15% of the OS in the world second only to WIN who controls around 80%. Logic is, if i were a software developer and wants my product to sell i can create a virus that only my software can fix. and of couse i wanna create it for where the money is not for any small time business.=D
672178
Sygate works well also and it is freeware.\n\n <edit> But there are other areas of compromise so you may want to research about securing your computer. </edit>
516811
in my Opnion, Windows XP is the best. It really dosent matter if its pro, MCE, Home Etc. Windows XP update are quite effecient than others. More softwares are compatable with Windows than with anyother OS. \n\nHere is what the Company says:\n\nHelps Protect Your PC\n\nAutomatically keep your PC up-to-date with the latest security enhancements including the Windows Security Center, Windows Firewall, and more to help protect your computer from viruses and worms that can spread through the Internet. \n \n Quickly Connect to Wireless Networks\n\nWindows XP Professional provides rich, wireless network support, helping you simply and easily connect to wireless networks whether in your home, office, or out on the road. \n \n Keep Your Laptop More Secure\n\nThe Encrypting File System, only in Windows XP Professional, provides an additional level of file protection from hackers and data theft by transparently encrypting files with a randomly generated key. If your laptop gets stolen or lost, unauthorized users should not be able to read or view your confidential files. \n \n Get More Life Out of Your Laptop Battery\n\nSave battery power when you're working on the road, at the library, or coffee shop. Windows XP Professional extends battery life by managing the way your laptop uses power. Now you can work longer on battery power and more accurately forecast how long your batteries will last. \n \n Set Up and Share Your Computer Quickly and Easily\n\nQuickly set up and connect all the computers, printers, devices, and an Internet connection in your home with the all new Network Setup Wizard. Sharing a computer with others has never been easier; quickly access your personal files and accounts without having to close applications or restart the computer. \n \n Easy To Use\n\nThe clean, simple design of Windows XP Professional puts the features you use most often at your fingertips, helping you find them quickly. \n \n Work From Anywhere\n\nThe Remote Desktop feature found only in Windows XP Professional allows you to remotely access your PC running Windows XP Professional, from another Windows-based PC, so you can work with all of your files and applications while away from your office or home PC. \n \n Recover Easily From Problems Caused by System or Application Changes\n\nIf something goes wrong with your computer, you can easily remove and roll back any system or application changes without losing files and other valuable information. \n \n Join a Network or Domain\n\nWindows XP Professional is designed to work with Windows Server networks and includes capabilities for both small office networks with up to 10 PCs and Windows Server based networks. \n \n Work With the Tools You Need to Get Things Done\n\nChoose from the widest range of software, hardware, and services designed to work together seamlessly including support for many older applications designed for earlier versions of Windows.
114082
It depends on the pathces you apply to the OS,\n\nfor example: Windows XP with service pack 2 is much secure than the standard eddition of Windows XP.
353009
Why? I run Linux. If I'm going to get a free OS I'll get the superior one, thanks.
750938
The OS will handle it.
521960
If you have enough hard drive space, you can run both.  It is called a dual boot system.  You get to choose at startup. \nEach has its benefits.  Windows is a little easier with better support for things like scanners and such.  Linux is much, much cheaper.  It is more stable with no known viruses. Programs are usually free. However, it will not work with most soft or windows modems. Xandros is a good starter linux distribution.  If you download it, it is free in the basic edition.
13117
i think you be asking about the new operating system ubuntu. I install and use this OS on my PC and i find it to be a user friendly and a good combination of many embedded software.i still dont use it for networks i find it to be a good OS for a home user.
1090656
While some of us can do your homework for you, it does you no good in the long run.\nI will give you a clue: A secure operating system will be designed in such a way that non-privileged code will not be able to compromise the integrity of the system. In other words, malicious program code - intentional or accidental will not compromise O.S. security unless it is running in a trusted level.\n\nGo with that concept to research and write the report.\n\n Hope this helps.
172173
I prefer AVG Anti-Virus (from www.grisoft.com). It seems pretty reliable, has a pretty decent 'out of the box' installation and, for individuals, is free. They have a variety of products for Windows & Linux in workstations and in server installs. >Even a free one, but you have to hunt for it.>\nFrom my experiences between AVG, McAfee & Norton, AVG has the least impact on running on your system.\n**DO NOT FORGET**\nSecurity needs to be a multi-level install of protection since viruses & spyware seldom uses the same attack methods.\nGoto someonewhocares (link below) to get yourself a HOSTS file. The directions of where to put it are in the file. It is a mega-handy file to keep updated on your system.\nI also prefer Spybot for my anti-spyware defense. \n\nNOTE: This is all FREE! WooHoo!
956639
Read this:\nhttp://askcomputerexpert.ws43.com/security/
150638
According to PCWorld.com, BitDefender 9 is the best.  Norton is number 5 and it's a huge memory hog.  McAfee is #2, which can also be a memory hog.
25772
Personally, I prefer Ubuntu. It's easy to use and very stable, for servers or for the desktop. I think there's even a version specific for servers, but I'm not sure on that.
110056
good firewall\npassword protect
108794
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_operating_systems
19936
Depends on what you need and where your experience is.  Plus "servers" can mean OPERATING SYSTEMS or APPLICATION SERVERS (WEB SERVERS).\n\nWEB SERVERS:\n\napache - most common, stable, secure, by far.\n\nOPERATING SYSTEMS:\n\nFreeBSD - Most would say it is the most stable, best security, and its FREE\n\nLinux - has more people developing on it, so it can do things FreeBSD can't, it is FREE\n\nSun/Solaris is expensive, but also good\n\nMicrosoft servers suck, but sometimes are good for microsoft solutions.
302841
Microsoft Windows is a bloated insecure monster.  Like a house that's had a new story added to it every few years, each new addition featuring better technology and yet the foundation and bottom floors remain archaic and full of poorly patched holes.\n\nThe argument for best system can however be made on the grounds that as the most popular OS on earth it's compatibility with pretty much all commercialy developed software packages is assured.\n\nJust my thoughts,\n\nArmus