Are you think human rights is observed in iran?
349479
nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo, women women women women...Islamic regime...i.e. theocracy...-->DESPOTISM, DICTATORSHIP,NO HUMAN RIGHTS, NO FREEDOM, INJUSTICE do urself and ur children's children and the world a favor and either leave or revolt...
619715
I have absolutely nothing against Iranian people... why would I ??? people are people everywhere... there are good people everywhere, just like there  are bad people everywhere....
814081
Human rights refers to the concept of human beings as having universal rights, or status, regardless of legal jurisdiction or other localizing factors, such as ethnicity, nationality, and sex. As is evident in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, human rights, at least in the post-war period, are conceptualized as based on inherent human dignity, retaining their universal and inalienable character.\n\nThe existence, validity and the content of human rights continue to be the subject to debate in philosophy and political science. Legally, human rights are defined in international law and covenants, and further, in the domestic laws of many states. However, for many people the doctrine of human rights goes beyond law and forms a fundamental moral basis for regulating the contemporary geo-political order. For them, they are democratic ideals.\n\nContents [hide]\n1 Human rights legislation \n2 History \n2.1 International bodies \n2.2 Regional legislation \n3 History of human rights \n4 Philosophy of human rights \n4.1 Types of human rights \n4.2 Justification of human rights \n5 Violations of human rights \n5.1 Monitoring \n5.2 Protection and promotion \n5.3 Non-governmental and multilateral organizations \n6 Notes \n7 See also \n8 References \n9 External links \n9.1 Human rights organizations \n \n\n\n[edit] Human rights legislation\nWhere it has been adopted, human rights legislation commonly contains:\n\nsecurity rights that protect people against crimes such as murder, massacre, torture and rape \nliberty rights that protect freedoms in areas such as belief and religion, association, assembling and movement \npolitical rights that protect the liberty to participate in politics by expressing themselves, protesting, participating in a republic \ndue process rights that protect against abuses of the legal system such as imprisonment without trial, secret trials and excessive punishments \nequality rights that guarantee equal citizenship, equality before the law and nondiscrimination \nwelfare rights (also known as economic rights) that require the provision of education and protections against severe poverty and starvation \ngroup rights that provide protection for groups against ethnic genocide and for the ownership by countries of their national territories and resources \nSee International human rights instruments.\n\n\n[edit] History\n \nEleanor Roosevelt with the Spanish text of the Universal Declaration in 1949Appalled by the barbarism of the Second World War, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. While not legally binding, it urged member nations to promote a number of human, civil, economic and social rights, asserting these rights are part of the "foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world". The declaration was the first international legal effort to limit the behaviour of states and press upon them duties to their citizens following the model of the rights-duty duality.\n\nMany states wanted to go beyond the declaration of rights and create legal covenants which would put greater pressure on states to follow human rights norms. Because some states disagreed over whether this international covenant should contain economic and social rights (which usually require a greater effort to fulfill on the part of individual states), two treaties were prepared.\n\nIn 1966 and 1976 respectively, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights came into force. With the Universal Declaration of Human Rights these documents form the International bill of rights.\n\n\n    ...recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world     \n—Preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948\n \n\nSince then several other pieces of legislat
48366
When the freedom loving people of Iran are numerous enough and strong enough to force their autocrats from power and establish and defend a free and open society.  It will be a long fight for them since the freedom-haters are numerous and dedicated, and often they succeed in scapegoating the freedom-loving West for the problems caused by their own tyranny.\n\nOne way or another, the march of history is toward greater liberation of the individual.  Let's just hope the bloody way to freedom experienced by France, Germany, Italy, Japan, or Russia does not come to Iran.
123590
Actually... while I agree education is key. Revolution over the extremist "leadership" that has iron fisted control is a necessity. I fully believe the common Iranian people are not as extremist as those who have the reigns in that country. Given the chance, the Iranian people like everyone else, would prefer a free government and society with peace at heart. To obtain that peace and freedom, it will take action though. Freedom is not just given. Freedom is earned and won. Blood is freedom's stain, and many times it takes fighting and revolution to win freedom. The extremist and hate filled people in charge in Iran will not give up their iron-fisted control just because they are asked.
691747
I think Iranians are just those people who want Peace . but some countries like America and  his followers  can't sand Iran beside them.They say Iran wants to made nuclear Weapon while these countries themselves have these kinds of weapon and say Iran shouldn't have . but let me tell you not only Iran doesn't  have this kind of weapon but also our religion Islam doesn't let to kill others.\nLook ! Have you ever heard that Iran had attacked to any country\nmeanwhile <they don't let Iran to speak directly with other people all over the world. they sensor our leader's and precedent's speak. Think if they let Iran to speak directly to the peoples they themselves can judge who is the right and who is the wrong
106771
Tell me something,since you seem to care about peoples rights,were you this concerned when muslim zealots desecrated Buthist statues,blew them up with dynamite and machineguns,or do you believe that only muslim religion has rights.
753573
I hold nothing but respect, and especially hope, towards the Iranian people. What your culture and heritage has given to the development of mankind is immeasurable.\n\nEven Alexander was fascinated to the point of marrying a Persian woman.\n\nI certainly don't believe that former mayor of Tehran-- Ahmadinijad-- speaks for the whole of the Iranian people.\nNeither do I hold the Ayatollahs' words of hatred for  the West against you.\n\nAmerica has it's own unstable leaders.\n\nI pray that the Iranian people depose of those Theocrats that seek world confrontation.\n\nI'm told there are many things about American culture the Iranian people enjoy. While this knowledge makes me happy, please don't think Hollywood and it's moral decadence represents ALL of America.\n\nJust like you, The USA counts millions of people that want peace for their families.
443963
The Iranians I have met have been very friendly and good people. Unfortunately, they are ruled by evil mullahs preaching hate. They are oppressed by the evil theocracy that took over after the Shah was deposed, and suffer without freedom or liberty.\n\nBut, except for some of us, nobody - not the UN, not the EU not the Democrats - give a rat's tail about the people of Iran. They're too busy hating Bush, hating Israel and hating the USA to actually care about anybody.
1082730
I have known Iranians in the past. They were all very nice and good people who became terribly upset when the Shah was deposed and the ayatollah came to power. One was in the US on a student visa and he was afraid the mad mullahs would either imprison him or force him into their war against Iraq if he ever returned.\n\nThe people of Iran deserve much better than the tyranny of the jihadists and false preachers they are currently suffering under.
213379
I think that the way people live is a greater persuader than what they say. As long as non Muslims see fanatical people rioting in the streets as in Paris a few months ago,\nor over the cartoons a few weeks ago, it will be difficult to expect people to be open minded enough to listen to what you have to say. I mean come on, Iran's president denied the holocaust and Israel's right to even exist. I don't recall seeing them rioting in the streets!
406198
I believe that they live in houses that are probably more like ours than most people imagine. I also believe that most Iranians have a religious believe system that is very different from ours and most people do not understand it. I also believe that there leader is a nut job and is looking to pick a fight. If that happens, it will be the Iranian people that have the most to loose.
402801
The idea here is that systems are created by people and not single individuals. The Iranian people by whatever reason rosed against the regime of the Shah in 1979 to usher in the current system.For the past 26 years the story has been to change again, one wonders whether Iranians have not understood their action well when the topple the Monarchy in 1979. At any rate it seems the current govt is having as much support and enemies from in and out side. With the current deadlock one could but only think the regime can survive if the people fighting it continue to be divided. The strength of any sysytem lies in the unity of its people and thier loyality towards the establishment.
1068797
is there an iranian guy???!!!
100641
If the Iranian students, took holds of nuclear technology, I would be moderately sure they would use it for the benefit of the Persian nation. In the hands of the current Iranian regime, this technology will be used most of all for the sake of destruction. Yes, the Iranian people have every right to enjoy the benefits of the modern science. They would be denied those rights by their fanatical leaders who would use them as a safe guard against the US intervention, and as a threat to Israel, among other countries. That is why, they should not be allowed to have it, it is as stupid, as was making a peace agreement with  Hitler. And it is, once again, the leaders who make the common citizens suffer from their fanatism.\nSo that is my view: the Iranian people should have the nuclear technology, after they change the regime and put sane people to take care of their needs, and not of the needs of Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hizbollah that care not about the Persian nation in the first place.
866914
I can't give you an exact date, time, or anything, but if nothing short of revolution happens in at least 20-25 years, either it's overdue or 90% of Iranians love their Islamic fundamentalist overlords.
202688
you hit that nail right on the head, dude.\nespecially when it comes to culture and history, Iran is unparalleled.