Are there only a certain number of faces to go around?  (Read on)?
340322
LMAO!  I hope I was handed an original.  Have you ever seen anybody who looks like me?
878499
Yes, there can be too many.
861916
I can't see the rest of your question, but even numbers can be multiples of three. Like 6 (2x3). They are not mutually exclusive.
948764
well 6 can be done 5 ways, but 12 only one
725017
Yes as many as it takes.\nJust make sure you count them all.
208189
Are there supposed to be multiple choices?
582315
not so many just 3 or 4
939383
Could you please specify which cheeks you are referring to?...
669147
number of sides, congurency?, size of angles, distinguishing characteristics
908791
Many are available.\n\nplrr
586408
More than one, you just have to find them.\n\nGood luck
242225
As many as you can fit in!
714298
directly to the eyes. face could be fine..
253501
well there has to be more than we see
113373
haha u stoel this idea from that other lady nick...its probably  2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 but im not gonna go with 9 on this one...
94604
A quotation from\nhttp://www.ams.org/featurecolumn/archive/sylvester3.html\n\n"In retrospect, it is clear that one could easily see that there had to be at least three ordinary lines for any point-line configuration. This follows from Melchior's work. Later it was shown that the number of ordinary points had to grow larger as the number of points in a plane finite configuration grew. Both G. Dirac and T. Motzkin were among those who explicitly conjectured that there would be at least n/2 ordinary points for a set of n plane points. However, it should again be noted that for n =7 and 13, there are configurations for which this bound does not hold. The additional requirement that n be large enough has to be added. It was announced by Hansen that he had a proof that there were always at least n/2 (n > 13), but the proof, unfortunately, had an error. Despite this, there were many correct new results in Hansen's investigations related to Sylvester-Gallai results. The number of ordinary points is known to be at least 3n/7 (n > 2), as was shown by L. Kelly and W. Moser, and the best known result (due to J. Csima and E. Sawyer) is that the number of ordinary lines is at least 6n/13 (n > 6). "
345664
Um, well, are you talking about drawings or models? Either way they can get pretty intricate. Maybe you ought to make your next question a little more specific we can actually help you.