The human intelligence performs the same set of operations (completely or partially) for each thing-?
345288
yes our brain is programmed in a natural way so in all things that we do we may find a preset procedure that our brain follows
732509
That's not true.  That's actually a big misconception.  Humans use 100% of their brain.  Even something as simple as scratching your head uses a large percentage of your brain. "When you make a movement, say with your left arm, you unconsciously plan that movement and you are unaware of this planning stage. To make a single voluntary movement, the frontal cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus, and premotor cortex are involved. And this is just for one movement. If you factor in everything else that we do at one time, like searching for certain items, listening to and comprehending speech, thinking and planning, memory consolidation, etc., then really, we are doing quite a lot with our brains."\n\nhttp://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/tenper.html\nhttp://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percnt.htm\nhttp://skeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2006/03/only_have_10_of.html\nhttp://www.mercola.com/2004/oct/30/brain_use.htm\nhttp://www.brain-fx.com/2005/11/do_we_really_on.html\nhttp://www.alternativescience.com/no_brainer.htm\nhttp://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/moments/s1090374.htm
672377
One of the differences is in how much pre-frontal lobe cortex we have. The pre-frontal lobes have to do with "connecting the dots"...logical analysis, association...it allows us to visualize the future, make rationale judgments and plan. For this reason hey call it the "executive" part of the brain. In humans, 33% of the cortex, the thinking part of the brain, is frontal. In chimpanzees, it's only about 10%. That's a huge difference, signifying that humans have a whole lot more of the kind of brain function that produces higher level intelligence.
1089430
Its the way humans are designed.
643452
Paramount, everything the computer does is math.\n\nUsing the 0 & 1 to make up all known numbers and characters and to use logical math pathways to calculate instructions in the CPU, the very basis of a computer works in math.
1069638
Your question is not easily deciphered.  Are you asking why intelligence isn't needed to design the human brain?  It was.  God is omnipotent and he's the one who designed it.  Why do you think we know such a small fraction of its uses?  Because we, as humans, could never even begin to fathom the complexities of God.
463192
We use 100% of our brain-or at least 100% of our brain sense signals and uses oxygen and glucose.  Any neuron which does not connect with another and depolarize occasionally will probably die.  I have no idea where this myth came from, unless it was from studies of learning and memory.  We can learn a great deal more than most of us do-any average person could learn multiple languages, become expert in a number of fields, etc, but we don't.  This doesnt mean we dont use our brains-learning is more likely the generation of new pathways, connections, etc.  So it may be that we only learn 10% of what we could (put this way, it would be closer to 1%).  The majority of the brain is set aside for motor and sensory system integration- It takes an enormous amount of brain power to just perform our normal movements and to interpret and filter all the huge amount of sensory information we get every second-*That* is the primary action of the cortex.
1003952
Howard Gardner came up with this theory. His book Frames of the Mind details  intelligences such as: Visual / Spatial Intelligence, Musical Intelligence, Verbal Intelligence, Logical/Mathematical Intelligence, Interpersonal Intelligence, Intrapersonal Intelligence, and Bodily / Kinesthetic Intelligence)\nIt means that everyone has a special talent or intelligence.  For example the movie Rainman ( with Dustin Hoffman and Tom Cruise) illustrates the case of an autistic man that had a special talent with mathematics.
19142
Its based on Artificial Neural Networks, which are programmatical methods of trying to duplicate the activity of the human brain. It comprises of a learning stage, where the paths to different methods are chalked out. Then, when the input comes in, the program tries to track the path of the successive answers to ones that match the user's input closest (one method of achieving this is finding the least difference between each pair of input and entry in the database). This is done stage-wise, until a good guess is made on the possible solution to the user's responses.
396535
Knowledge and intelligence are two wholly different things, but one usually follows the other. Intelligence is the ability to rationally solve problems. Knowledge is just knowing a lot of stuff, like an encyclopedia.\n\nOh, and I hope that Fruitcake! is joking.
826773
Knowing is only half the battle, because you can be the smartest person in the world but be 100% useless if you don't use it for something constructive or productive.  \nYou can be WILLING to do somethin, hell everyone at one point is willing to make some effort on some sort of goal, but if no initiative to act on that will is apparent, then you can will all you want but it won't mean SHEEIT...to anyone nor yourself.  \nIt all boils down to good works are nothing without action.  Nuff sed.
401209
Everyone has the same brain capacity, unless you have Down's Sydnrome, or other mental problems. It is how you use your brain that makes you smart. If you never learn, never want to learn, you are likely to be stupid. Vice versa.
1145557
Computers only do what humans ask them to do....or program them to do.any errors are glitches not seen at the time of programming....so yes they are human errors.
223780
I think intelligence is when we think logically about something. Like if we are taught that when metal gets hot, it turns red, and we see a stove we stay away, that's intelligence.\n\nWhen it's red, and you don't know any better, but veer away because it doesn't seem right or safe, that's instint. With instint, you don't have to learn. You just know it.
4340
No, they both function the exact same speed, because the processor will see it as the same operation.
54487
A big problem is that we ourselves can't pinpoint a definition of intelligence. We have tests for intelligence (e.g. the Turing test) but there is still disagreement as to whether passing this test would consititute being intelligent (e.g. the Chinese room experiment). With no clearly stated goal, we can't formulate a feasible strategy for reaching the goal, nor can we definitively say we have reached the goal.
683176
It is actually both. I also believe it is how well you grasp and see things.  It is basically how you think and learn.  The only part of the test that would prolly be taught(what you know) is the math stuff. You can find more detail here.\n\nAn intelligence quotient or IQ is a number derived from a set of standardized tests developed to measure a person's cognitive abilities ("intelligence") in relation to their age group. An IQ test does not measure intelligence the way a ruler measures height (absolutely), but rather the way a race measures speed (relatively); IQ is described as a "quotient" because, originally, it represented the ratio between a person's "mental age" and actual chronological age.\n\nFor people living in the prevailing conditions of the developed world, IQ is highly heritable, and by adulthood the influence of family environment on IQ is undetectable. IQ test scores are correlated with measures of brain structure and function, as well as performance on simple tasks that anyone can complete within a few seconds.\n\nIQ is correlated with academic success, job performance, socioeconomic advancement, and "social pathologies". It is taken by psychologists to be an excellent proxy for intelligence, and possibly the best measurable definition of intellectual ability, but generally not taken to represent intelligence perfectly. Recent work has demonstrated links between IQ and health, longevity, and functional literacy.