Please EXPLAIN WHY ENGLAND COULD NOT RULED THAILAND ...WHAT WAS THE MAIN REASON EVEN THEY RULED NEARBY ALL COU
347077
Couldn't comprehend your English. It clearly says how many characyers left to explain. If there weren't any characters left you could explain underneath.\n\nYou could add even details. I don't know why people don't realize and leave us guessing.
984860
I would say the England because during that time it rose to become the ruler of an empire that the sun never set on).\n\nGood Luck!!!
168970
It is one of those questions where books could be written.  That said, a case could be made that the British started it by going against their (and America’s) Common Law, by not applying all of those rights to those living in the Americas.  It was only a matter of time before there would be a response to such a policy.  Since the British Crown reject peaceful petitions to redress grievances, violence would follow.
855060
now you see why i don't come here...not because i can't fight bak...it because it's soo ignorant.\n\n GO ENGLAND!\n\n\nstill luv ya boons.
871338
The Queen of England is much richer than either of them. She owns extensive land and things such as jewels etc which are priceless. That is apart from her monitary assets.
774827
I could easily agree with you on some places. British rule always made sure that things in these countries ran much smoother and the British protected those people from outside threats and civil enemies. And it is weird how all these 3rd world countries all seem to be packing old, rusty kalashnikovs... that last bit really made me laugh. One of the things I'll have to remember!!!! But now they are all moving into England and god help anyone who speaks up against them, because "it would be un-PC".
871078
It definitely would be a different world.  I'm not sure if it would be better.\n\nThat little country touched every continent.  But so did other countries.  France, Dutch, Portugal, Spain.  It's just England was stronger at that time.\n\nIf not them  one of the other ones would have.
795052
If you want to read about how Asia was ruled under European Imperialism (the period of when most of Asia was under the control through colonization by Europeans) visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperialism_in_Asia and you will get most if not all of your answers.\n\nGood Luck!!!
896286
Edgar was a human.He was a king of England.
1068703
They're out of the tournament, I don't think England has ever won a game against Sweden in a World Cup, and they're going to play very relaxed on Tuesday since they're already qualified to the next round. Trinidad has a good defense but I can't see them scoring a lot of goals, they have to win by 2-0, and Sweden has to lose by 1-0 atleast.
917971
Great Britain is a nation, not England, Scotland and Wales they are countries not a bunch of islands. Just as in the comonwealth they are seperate. Is Australia not part of the commonwealth as this would mean we could start picking your players instead.\nYou were well beat so get over it, and if anyones a cheat it's Willie Mason.
1062885
Please visit this URL :\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siam\nYou'll get all the details you need.
431007
He ensured we did not have a monarchy. They wanted to make him king - he refused.
1033609
the english coast line is completely different from brazil's... for starters we have water on all four sides brazil is land locked on 3 sides .....  this is why the uk is a island a better comparison would be australia or iceland in my opinion
693869
They beat the English in 1066 in the battle of Hastings but no i don't think they have won a war since,they are wimps and it's a well known fact because they left the British to fight on their own in both world wars.The only good leader the French have had is Napoleon who was the Emperor of France and they did hardly anything in the second world war compared to Britain and America.They also lost the 100 year war with England(and Wales because Wales was the first country England took over to make the UK)and it just goes to show that France are rubbish and are not brave at all.
701605
Elbert(sp) was the first English king and basically he fought his way to the top and managed to stay there.  Myth is that all English monarchs since have been descended from him.
28568
i'm not quite sure what you mean, but america had the revolutionary war to break away from england. because england was basicaly trying to control them and make them pay so many different taxes that they hardly had enough money left for them selfes. also there was a law passed by england that said that they cant settle west of the applaction mouintains. and they had gained alot of land there by defeating the french in a war years before.