Why don´t we invade Canada?
350287
We?..Who are you talking about?..Oh or do you assume all readers are American?
625739
America. Why not ? It is much more advance than Canada.
152389
Look at the first answer. This is why you cannot take Liberal whockos seriously. The ASSUME they KNOW an answer, just because they have some stupid and ill advised preconceived notion. "The war is about oil" "We get most of our oil from the Middle East" etc. The combination of Canada and Mexico more than doubles our import totals from Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Kuwait (the top 3 Middle Eastern countries from which we import Crude Oil, and the only 3 in the top 15 countries from which we import oil)\n\nIn actuality Canada IS the top country from which we import crude oil. The majority of our crude oil imports will continue to come from the Western Hemisphere for the forseeable future.\n\nCANADA 1,892 1,776 1,642 1,556 1,616\nMEXICO 1,707 1,658 1,550 1,552 1,598\nSAUDI ARABIA 1,438 1,267 1,438 1,449 1,495\nVENEZUELA 1,183 1,009 1,231 1,379 1,297\nNIGERIA 1,174 1,163 1,060 1,006 1,078\nANGOLA 425 641 450 306 306\nIRAQ 390 572 520 626 655\nECUADOR 340 264 276 261 232\nKUWAIT 268 273 215 205 241\nALGERIA 212 265 228 199 215\nBRAZIL 159 65 94 0 51\nGABON 139 66 127 233 142\nCOLOMBIA 135 281 156 135 142\nNORWAY 66 103 119 63 143\nTRINIDAD AND TOBAGO 62 70 62 22 49\n\nWe are not in Iraq for oil, nor were we ever. We were first there because of the invasion of Kuwiat, and we helped answer the call of the Kuwaiti people for assistance. We are there now to finish the job because of the violations of the cease fire agreement that ended hostilities from the military action from Desert Storm.\n\nAs evidenced by the actual documentation...\n\nThe Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public law 107-243, 116 Stat. 1497-1502) was a law passed by the United States Congress authorizing what was soon to become the Iraq War. The authorization was sought by President George W. Bush. It passed the House on October 10 by a vote of 296-133, and by the Senate on October 11 by a vote of 77-23, obviously receiving a limited amount of support from Democrats, and must be considered an overall unsupportive vote when compared to the "war vote" for the Second World War and other more poplularly supported conflicts. It was signed into law by President Bush on October 16, 2002.\n\nThe Resolution cited several factors to justify a war:\n\n* Iraq's noncompliance with the conditions of the 1991 cease fire
683185
We aren't open to attack on our borders.  We have many military installations on the Canadian as well as Mexican borders.  We still have more troops here than in Iraq.
740202
We( Canada) lost 2 more of our "GAY" solders today in Afghanistan , You A**hole. We have lost more in Afghanistan than the UK, and %wise the US. We weren't behind the illigal war in Iraq. As far as I'm concerned we should not be in Afghanistan, the US created the problem by backing the Taliban, and now they are backing the Northern Alliance, another group of warlords.   \n\nSome food for thought, if you are capable of it, \n\nToday marks the day that you will have been in Iraq longer than the US was in all of World War II. Canada had been there since Sept/39\n\nThat's right. We, with the help of the allies, especially Russia, were able to defeat all of Nazi Germany, Mussolini, and the entire Japanese empire in LESS time than it's taken the world's only superpower to secure the road from the airport to downtown Baghdad. \n\nAnd we haven't even done THAT. After 1,347 days, in the same time it took us to took us to sweep across North Africa, storm the beaches of Italy, conquer the South Pacific, and liberate all of Western Europe, we cannot, after over 3 and 1/2 years, even take over a single highway and protect ourselves from a homemade device of two tin cans placed in a pothole. No wonder the cab fare from the airport into Baghdad is now running around $35,000 for the 25-minute ride. And that doesn't even include a friggin' helmet. \n\nIs this utter failure the fault of our troops? Hardly. That's because no amount of troops or choppers or democracy shot out of the barrel of a gun is ever going to "win" the war in Iraq. It is a lost war, lost because it never had a right to be won, lost because it was started by men who have never been to war, men who hide behind others sent to fight and die. \n\nLet's listen to what the Iraqi people are saying, according to a recent poll conducted by the University of Maryland: \n\n** 71% of all Iraqis now want the U.S. out of Iraq. \n\n** 61% of all Iraqis SUPPORT insurgent attacks on U.S. troops. \n\nYes, the vast majority of Iraqi citizens believe that our soldiers should be killed and maimed! So what the hell are we still doing there? Talk about not getting the hint. \n\nObviously the Allies must have done a hell of a lot more than you give us Credit for.
191414
Actually, Canada has deployed troops to Afghanistan because she is a military member of NATO, and in the immediate aftermath of 9-11 NATO invoked the clause that calls for all members to come to the defense of another member state who has been attacked. All the members of NATO agreed that Afghanistan had a direct participation in the attack against the United States.
311762
As an American of Canadian descent, I got both sides of this.  Americans know Canada is our ALLY. No matter what, we share this hemisphere and thankfully we DO enjoy a grudging respect and to certain points....affection for one another. The French were there for us in the beginning, but have looked down their nose at both us AND Canada for a long time. So its basically US and Canada vs. France. We bust on Canada because were basically brothers, freindly jabbing and the occasional fight that gets quashed quickly and were drinkin beer again.
959890
Why do u hate Canada so much??
698122
1) we shouldn't be invading people anyway.\n2) Think about it. We are at war with a country, would you want to grant automatic refuge to it's citizens without question? Obviously not. Securitywise, that would be an extremely stupid move.
1141309
Yes, if we were rebuilding Canadian government, economic, and infrastuctures.  Nice try, but apples and oranges dude.  How about this.....at the end of WW2 we occupied Japan into the 50's!\n\nRead a history book.
180243
I believe Canada is a part of NATO and NATO is in Afghanistan at the moment. Plus the Canadians are a good professional force. They need to do their part.
83125
First off, for those that answered, we are NOT in Iraq for oil. Our main oil supply comes from Canada. North America(including our own country) supplies almost THREE TIMES the amount of oil we get from the Middle East. If we were in it for oil, we would have invaded Canada long ago, and it would have been an easy fight(no offense to Canadians). It is well known(to those who dont ignore it) that Iraq harbors, even promotes, terrorism toward other nations. Well, it used to, before Good ol' Dubya handled it. So get some facts before you force your unfounded statements on everyone.\n\nAnd to answer the question, no, the war in Iraq is not over. It will not be until the job is done. If we had an immediate withdrawl, as many liberals want, Iraq would become a refuge, a hive, of terrorists, greatly increasing the chance of another attack against the U.S. We are trying to make peace, because you cannot keep it if there is none to begin with. If liberals really try hard and look into the future, then they will see that its for the better, but i highly doubt that their highly biased minds will consider that.
874233
Canada has very peace country and nobody no why.......How!? I dono why.....I just wanna stay too for secutrity reason to.  Tank kayou veddy much!
227569
Dillinger is right, why would we go to war with Spain?  If we were ticking down the list of countries to invade, I think Spain would be pretty low down.  Again, we are pretty decent friends with Spain.
393693
In case U hadn't noticed, we can't invade Mexico because we ARE Mexico.  There R just as many Mexicans in the USA as there R down there.  The line that divides our 2 countries gets blurrier every day.  Our only course of action is 2 drag them up out of the gutter, upgrade their 3rd world status, fix them up like we did with Japan back in WWII.
760357
Canada will not defend you with military force.  And Canada has a mutual legal assistance treaty with Poland allowing for extradition if the alleged crime would be a crime under Canadian law.\n\nhttp://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/intpolicing/centralauth_e.htm\n\nSorry.
280139
None.  Canada is not a viable place to live, eh?