.Net Platform Vs J2EE Platform?
350560
i agree with the above, check the site as listed above as well, this is one of the debates that has gone on for a long time and will go on for ever more.\n\nits like the chicken or the egg question.\n\nboth languages have advantages and dissadvantages
354873
J2ME Java 2 Micro Edition.\nOne of it's application is in Handphone applications and game programming.\nIt run on KVM.
618448
Why only consider Microsoft? why not Sun?\n\nYou can develop dynamic web sites using one of the following:\n\n1. J2EE-JSP (Sun technology)\n2. Dot Net-ASP.NET (Microsoft technology)\n3. PHP (Open source)\n\nIf you want to develop stable, secured, strong and huge web sites, you will go for the J2EE.\n\nFor medium and small web sites, you should go for the ASP.NET.\n\nIt doesn't really matter what technology you're using. It all depends on the cost and time you are willing to spend on a web site. All technologies will do the work.\n\nJ2EE is very expensive to host and maintain. ASP.NET is cheaper. PHP is very very cheap to host.\n\nMost people tend to use PHP because it is cheaper and is well integrated with MySQL database. MySQL database is an open source database engine. But not as secured as Oracle or MS SQL Server. When you work with open source technologies, you end up with cost free web site, you will only pay for the hosting.\n\nSo, again, it's a matter of what web site you're developing and what costs are you (or your client) willing to pay.
321167
.NET is kind of a translator - it's an effort to let people program in a variety of different languages, which then gets compiled into an intermediate language, when then gets compiled again into your machine's language.  It's sort of a lingua-franca translator.  Instead of having to have all these languages (VC#, VC++, VB, VJ++, etc) have to have their own compilers, they get translated by the same compiler into an intermediary language, which then gets translated again.  A bit slower in the long run and not quite as flexible, but it's still kind of a cool concept.
140261
Hi\n\nYou can use Tomcat Plugin(http://www.sysdeo.com/eclipse/tomcatplugin ) for developing J2EE applications in Eclipse. or install Exadel Studio (http://box.exadel.com/exadelproducts/app_products.process.main.start?_action=products ) .\n\nRegards\nAlbin Joseph\nhttp://www.javacertificate.net
510525
got to www.sourceforge.net and search for J2ME code Projects
82859
Well, since I'm not affiliated with Microsoft or Sun, here's my 2 cents.\n\nC#, or any .Net platform program, or any Java program running under JRE should NEVER be faster at complex math calculations than any language that compiles natively.\n\nHaving said that, if the speed limit is 70 miles per hour, can you go faster in a Porche 911 or a Ford Taurus?\n\nYou are going to have to work real hard to convince me that with the speed of computer hardware today, your speed differential between .Net or Java code versus something natively compile is worth it.\n\nMost of the time, even with complex calcuations, I/O is the bottleneck.  But if speed is of that importance, then I'd say it was important enough to prototype the calcuation in both languages and test it out.
775699
Yes, though it is not going to be as efficient.  It should not have any problems.  Server 2003 is pretty much the same as W2K except is has more features.  Hard to find out exactly what you are looking for, but feel free to follow up.
52198
Assuming that you don't know C/C++, spending 5 hrs a day for around a month makes you confident in using constructs of core Java, ie., basic Java and some of frequently used APIs (programs that already developed and installed when you install JAVA) of J2SE(Java 2 Standard Edition). And, ofcourse, the duration varies depending on individual, faster you get hold on concepts, shorter time it takes. Then, depending on whether you want to be a GUI programmer (eg., Swings) or Server side prgorammer (J2EE, Java 2 Enterprise Edition) or embedded (J2ME), each domain being mostly independent of each other, that time varies.\n\nThe question is a difficult one to answer when you say just "Java". Hope the above answer gives you some idea of what it is like.\n\nhttp://java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/ - Tutorials link
1031463
I fear your question will lead more to flames and IDE proselytizing than answers.  \n\nI fall into the NetBeans camp and can say that working with Netbeans 5.0 is a pleasure.   Particular strengths include the aforementioned Matisee, particular strength in mobile app creation and adherence to Java spec (offical libraries and methodology) in the realm of Swing vs. SWT.\n\nIn attempt to find a more neutral reference I submit this news article that highlights some of the differences:\n\nhttp://www.infoworld.com/article/06/04/13/77203_16TCnetbeans_1.html\n\nHere is another chap asking the same questions with several responses:\n\nhttp://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t63186.html
554158
There is No such standard solution structure or standard architecture for web project or windows application..\n\nBut I could say is Microsoft PetShop 3.0 architecture is now considered to be advantageous and also standard which competes with many other standard solution is java
525921
The Java Runtime Environment (JRE) consists of the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) core API libraries, and other supporting files. \nThe JRE is the smallest set of executables and files that constitute the standard Java platform.
201072
Did you mean Java?\n\nIf so you can get the runtime from http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/download.jsp
237939
Well using the database Oracle 10 lite it's not that difficult, but you need to know how to access it, you can read this book:\n\nBeginning J2ME: From Novice to Professional, Third Edition
446685
Not much. Indeed .NET was developed to include all the features of Java. Indeed .NET can be platform independent as well, the only thing that is missing is a CRE created for an OS different to Windows.\n\nJava has a lot more support from the "Free Software" side, so a lot more things can be found for free on Java than .NET\n\n.NET is installed right inside the new versions of Windows, so people doesn´t need to install addicional pieces of software to run a program.\n\nYou can have amazing Java Editors for free (like Eclipse).\n\nAnd so on, and on... and on.\n\nThe fight can last for ever, and some times it's more a decision of "In which side are you?".\n\nOf course, if you know Java many companies can employ you, and if you know .NET many others will do. But if you know both, that will open opportunities in both worlds.
7653
definitely .net, as a start, .net programmers average higher salary than j2ee. other reason: .net uses a standard visual studio.net tool which is easy to use and standardized also with the help of MSDN library which has all the solution if your stuck somewhere. while j2ee has several tools and each has its pros and cons which would probably delay your career start with confusion of selecting the best tools. since your familiar with C it would be much easier if you start with visual c++.net, also java uses quite different syntax and concept it would make it harder for you. both are object oriented.
88158
Well, in my opinion, we had/have platform independence with Java as well as many older and newer technologies designed for the Internet and Intranet environments.  While platform independence is a boon to the networked world and not a bad thing elsewhere, it is not a gut wrenching requirement for many applications on many platforms.  I think that part of the trouble lies simply with the IT community's unwillingness to concede that it is nice where you can get it, but won't stop computers in other non-networked environments (embedded platforms, stand alone workstations, point of sale terminals and high end mainframes or super computers, etc.) from running applications made with less portable languages and compilers.  In other words, people tend to use what they want in certain platforms and as long as it works it stays that way.  So, I'd say it has done as much as it has been called to do and will do more when it is called to do that.