preventive detention?
355078
Sounds like you are suggesting we detain people that COULD commit a crime. Sorry still cant do that. In this country CITIZENS are STILL considered INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty.
497930
I answered in your initial question, and will gladly answer anything I can. \nI have a high school sweetheart, a baby brother, a dear friend and a pen pal in the system and have, in their causes, become an advocate for the protection of basic inmate rights (No, I don't think it should be summer camp, but the law requires humane & sanitary conditions and consistant application of policy and THAT is what I try to see upheld)I am also involved in a website you may find useful, http://www.prisontalk.com\nIf you'd like to get information straight from the horses mouth, may I suggest that you create a questionaire and send it to inmates at a few different facilities?\nHere is a good place to find leads if that idea appeals to you. http://prisontalk.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?s=&daysprune=-1&f=294
454046
eather suspension or detention from school.
294608
There are a lot of rules in school. Fortunately, the teachers don't know them all. Play by the rules, make them regret they even considered a detention. For instance, if you are really good at one object, make the teacher ask you questions about the class insted of detention. Then, if you answer corectly, you win the battle in front of you r colleagues. After that, the teacher can't give you a detention because he/she would look bad in front of the rest of the class.
365161
Just learn your lesson and don't do it again.  You can't (or atleast shouldn't) "suck up" once you're in detention.  It's pointless because you're already there.\n\nPlus, what teachers and the school administration want to see is do you understand what you did wrong.\nTry to understand this relationship: action-->consequence
554761
Call 411 or google it.\n\nOkay, I googled it for you.  Here's the info:\n\nSt. Charles Youth Detention\n4450 Lincoln Highway\nSt. Charles, Ill 60175\nPhone: (630) 584-0506
820012
That's a very good question.  For most of society it is a good deterent, but so are the values of those same people.  The threat of prison will not deter some people from doing anything, that's a sad fact that I've seen thouands of times.  The reality is that prisons are NECESSARY because they keep criminals isolated from society and will at least prevent those who are locked up from committing crime.  Of course there are organized crime bosses who get locked up and still run things from the inside, but that's a whole different situation than your run of the mill burglar, etc.
805120
do you mean to go see a prisoner, visit? if so, i dont think they do background checks of any kind\n\nfor employment, they should do a national and state check,
425015
In order for it to be duress, there would have to be an explicit violent treat made or an illegal imprisonment or kidnapping.\n\nYou could argue, however, that the public school system holds a position of undue influence over a child's parents.  Because many families can not reasonably be expected to be able to afford private education or home-schooling, and because most area's truancy laws require children under the age of 16 to be receiving an education, the threat of expelsion could be a sufficient motivator to constitute undue influence, which would nulify any contract.\n\nHowever, convincing a jury that a child who tests posative for drug use should be allowed to continue to attend public schools would be a significant challenge.  I doubt that you would find an attorney that would want such a case unless there was some reason to believe that the child was singled out for reasons other than sufficient probable cause to believe that he/she was using drugs.\n\nIf there were a discrimination angle, or some kind of personal dislike for the student on the part of the official demanding the test, then you might have a case.  Otherwise, I doubt that it would go anywhere.
827206
If an arrested person becomes seriously ill, the custody officer will call an ambulance, the person will be escorted to hospital, one officer in the ambulance, one following behind in a car.\n\nDepending on the offence and the illness, the person may be bailed from their hospital bed, or they may even in the extreme be guarded by an armed police officer.
527563
Are you nuts? The police won't tell anyone about arrest warrants, least of all the person to be taken into custody. How in hell would they ever catch anyone if it were otherwise?
240213
I don't think so. Jail is jail. No matter where they jail. They have no freedom. They will meet the same problem inside the prison such as bullying, pressuring ,fighting ,raping among the criminals. Not happy at all.
370608
Talk to your local police about this. Every community has different guidelines and policies.
1059246
Firstly, sorry to read about your two boys. \n\nASBOs are a great idea on paper but in practice they are just not working. How can they be EFFECTIVELY enforced without a high police presence, which incidentally if there had been in the first place would likely have stopped the problems anyway. The way they are handed out at the drop of a hat at the momment is just appalling and far from stigmatising an offender is a badge of honour to those who actually deserve them, and a punishment that has a lasting effect on those that don't.
788624
How about preventing kids\n\n        I AM
62323
Suggest you go to DVMen.org for discussions of how the emergency protection/restraining order system is set up and has been used and abused.  Police can usually arrest where there is probable cause, and that can be established by statements of "victims."
176456
I imagine you are referring to checks as in the form of punishment, and if you recieve so many checks you lose privileges or go to the office. They are used as a form of control as opposed to detention or paddling. This is a good way to keep children in line.