is it true that every citizens in democratic country tends to mok their leader?
345937
It is the very nature of democracy that UK and to a lesser extent, US citizens, feel free to mock their leaders. They have no fear of reprisal and such mockery makes their leaders take note of the people they serve.
550006
Egypt,Turkey,Iran,Pakistan are democratic countries. In no two countries the democratic practices are exactly similar.In Europe, there are democracies with Sovereign Monarchs,for example.
807822
Do all politicians eruct from Iraq?
122375
Well any country no mather the religion comunsit or democrat is the same as every where else plople shape them by there self image and ignorance.\n\nFor example Take Comunist, they all have to be the same eat the same etc. bla bla ... or so says the mighty leader ... \n\nA democrat world is the Ignorant on but free to choice, thats why thear chaos, not that conuists dont have Chaos\n\nSo my answer is its just a country ... with plople just like us... Angry confused and upset...
801155
Democracy goes against all the laws of the jungle that guide human nature. It is the one form of government that tries to rise above petty selfish motves. The entire group decides what is in everyone's best interest, or tries to pick a leader best qualified to speak for it and make the best choice available. The leader rules by the people's pleasure, and may pay the ultimate price if found wanting.\nIt would be nice if we had a real democracy. (sigh)
106845
Actually the Government of the nation is accused of something. In some countries where there is no democratic government then the ruler, king/queen, head of the nation is accused. They are accused of the decisions they took or an act(s) they have done. Nations are accused of Human Right Violations, spreading or harbouring terrorism, polluting environment etc.
731778
Yes because in most democracies the security is typically less than in other forms of government.
557559
No, Because when a dictator dies more than likely they do not name a rightful heir/heiress and the emergance of another dictator occurs because after death the country is left in an other riot. Nope\n\ndictorship= another stronger dictator= another dicator\n\nunless somewhere peopel have free elections, which never seems to be truly free because the "dictator" threatens his political opponents and therby scres his own people into re-election Ex: Fidel castro(all opposition are in exile or killed) Robert Mugabe(Dictator of Zimbabwe) he has been president of Zimbabwe since 1980 when it was granted independence by England. He rigged the ballot boxes for each election to ensure his victory.\n\nSorry for long explanation but answer is no
508322
often these leaders are actually dictators who use fear and threat of violence to sustain their power over long periods of time. since the people of these countries are often poor, uneducated, etc. they have little means to fight back.
858537
mm well if this is what you meen, democracy is when all of the citizens send in votes for who they want to be president, and to decide which person to vote for, all of the people that are wanting to be president ( I forgot what they are called during this time) have a campaign and tell what they will do as president, the person with the most votes (which had the best campaign) wins the election and becomes president
184843
Well, yes and no. It's sad that we don't have a President that is supported more by the people. (regardless of whose fault it is)\n\nBut on the other hand, a healthy democracy has citizens who are highly critical of its politicians. If a President was too popular I think it would be a lot worse.
258483
Wel thats democracy for u...the system works in such a way..but u have a point..one person cant do much..its always collective force that needs to act..remember united we stand..
453891
Its the reading of world history, abuse of power & molestation of peoples' & even the human rights were the ordrer of Autocracy & Monarchism. Many examples of the recent past stand there in support of the records in history.  \nSo, democratic system is the better choice that can stop the emergence of Autocratic regime & Monarchism which has alway been seen as curse to the people. \nYes, God is always there for any system we follow or we don't.
101242
yes, but only for those who are willing to help themselves.\n\npeople that rely on others all the time are known as democrats
691201
theres like a million countries..\n\nand they dont have to be democratic.\n\nlook at china or soviet union \n\nas long as we get along who cares if its democratic?\n\nlet everyone have what they want...\n\nGood Question though.. make me think\npeace
206315
Sometimes. Usually each city-state had its own leader.
799483
Yes. This situation is logical. All government officers, however highly ranked, are there to serve the public and have to report into public representatives, who are nothing but elected political leaders. This is how democracy works. At times, it may not be a very efficient way of managing our affairs but democracy ensures that someone who actually represents the people is actually in charge. I can understand your cynicism. Somebody once said, in a democracy you deserve the government you get!