What's the dfference between a lexeme and a morpheme?
351941
Lexeme is the smallest unit in the meaning system of a language that can be distinguished from other similar units. A lexeme is an abstract unit. It can occur in many different forms in actual spoken or written sentences, and is regarded as the same lexeme even when inflected.\nFor example, in English, all inflected forms such as give, gives, give,,, giving, gave would belong to the one lexeme give.\nSimilarly, such expressions as bury the hatchet, hammer and tongs, give up, and whüe paper would each be considered a single lexeme. In a dictionary, each lexeme merits a separate entry or sub-entry.\n\n\nMorphem is also the smallest meaningful unit in a language. but a morpheme cannot be divided without altering or destroying its meaning. For example, the English work kind is a morpheme. If the d is removed, it changes to kin, which has a different meaning. Some words consist of one morpheme, e.g. kind others of more than one. For exampie, the English word unkindness consists of three morphemes: the STEM1 kind, the negative prefix un-, and the noun-forming suffix -ness. Morphemes can have grammatical functions. For example, in English the -s in she ralks is a gnmmatical morpheme which shows that the verb is the third-person singular present-tense form.
630476
Grammatically they are both correct.  #2 sounds more natural.  My only source is my Sprachgefühl (feel for language)
902509
I didn't find one on yahoo, interesting, probably a little difference in spellings etc, good luck
661172
paraphrase is a re-wording\n\ncommentary adds extra materials and expounds
823256
A. RY,rY\nB.Ry\nc.Ry,RY,ry,rY\nd. r,Y,ry\njust the differerent possiblities of rs and ys
364864
i dont think there is a difference between the two. =o
648431
The only way ı can find any logic in this sentence is if the comma before 'for example' is changed to a semi-colon. Then it's two different sentences and, even if I don't like it, I can parse it.\n\nSo, if that's the case, then it's 'situation', not 'patterns'. Patterns are an aspect of a leaf's form and physiology. You can reword this sentence like this: Leaves develop in different situations; according to these situations, the form and physiology vary.\n\nThis is logical when you look at the example, because 'different degrees of light' are different situations (as someone else said, 'environment' would be more suitable), and the example says that 'different degrees of light' affect how the leaf adapts (preumably altering its shape).\n\nHope this helps. Swat your teacher upside the head for giving you such an ill-formed question!
1004205
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistics
458889
It's not quite accurate to speak of "a difference between idioms and phrasal verbs".  Rather, phrasal verbs are one specific type of idiom.\n\nAn idiom is "a phrase which has a meaning that is commonly understood by speakers of the language, but whose meaning is often different from the normal meaning of the words"\n\nPhrasal verbs are "idiomatic expressions, combining verbs and prepositions to make new verbs whose meaning is often not obvious from the dictionary definitions of the individual words. They are widely used in both written and spoken English, and new ones are formed all the time as they are a flexible way of creating new terms."\nhttp://www.usingenglish.com/reference/phrasal-verbs/\n\nFor examples and discussion of a three-fold classification of phrasal verbs (into "separable", "inseparable" and "intransitive", based on what they do with nouns and pronouns) see: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/esl/eslphrasal.html
319564
Sounds put together form Morphemes , the indivisible units of meaning that go together to form Words , which are then arranged together in Phrases and Clauses and Sentences and beyond...
1121965
I'm not sure what you mean by "inflectional forms".  "Elect" can be a noun, as in "the elect", more typically referring to an elite group of people than the body of people voted to serve as representatives in a government.  As a verb (elect, elected, electing) it means to vote for people to represent you in government
896262
Grammatically, they're both correct.\n\nIf you're using this sentence in some kind of composition, your biggest problem is that the sentence has an inconsistent tone. The middle of the sentence has the sophisticated "atypical dialects," while the beginning and end are much more conversational and less descriptive.\n\nBut if you're asking me to pick, I would say the second.
558244
Im pretty certain that word is just a slightly different version of the rtf specification so you should be able to parse most of it with rtf.\n\nHope that helps.
587962
Is there a difference?
814516
In 3.0 they updated the spelling of "difference".\n\nRawlyn.
295814
Read out loud these words:\n\n"No."\n\n"No!"\n\n"No?"\n\nThe difference between these is tone. Now, imagine a language where these three words meant something totally different, not just different nuances on the same original word. Imagine for example that the first meant "horse", the second meant "house" and the third meant "big". Well, that's a tonal language.\n\nAside from many oriental languages, some European ones are tonal, too. For example, Norwegian.
129462
seems like a french word. \nif its french then these are the definitions\n1. Return to the line for the beginning of a paragraph with recess of this first line in the traditional typography.\n\n\n2.Line of a text in withdrawal compared to the other lines to indicate the beginning of a paragraph; by extension, the paragraph itself located between two withdrawals.\n\n\n3.In a text, line whose first word is in withdrawal.