If you had to make a grading rubric for the president, what criteria would you use?
342380
judge the economy throughout the term or terms.\n(growth,stale,or decline)\njudge the deficit (growth or decline)\njudge military actions (war, or UN actions)\nThe level of co-operation that we have with our allies and UN counterparts.\n(some are not allies)\nand \nthe level of secrecy that is developed and used.
126893
Break it up into different parts.  Like intellectual and Physical and social.  Under intellectual, you may break that down to memorization tasks, quick thinking tasks, and maybe reasoning tasks.  Memorization: easy, have them memorize something like the presidents.  Quick thinking:  Games where they need to recall the correct answer quickly.  Reasoning:  Solving word problems.\n\nUnder physical, you could have Heath class, PE, Sports, etc…\n\nUnder Social, you would have group sessions, team sports, etc…\n\nBasically, brainstorm and come up with as many ideas as you can.  Then try and break each one of those ideas into as many smaller components.  Once you get there, then start writing about each of those components. Write one or two paragraphs linking it all together and you will have your finished paper in no time flat.
536724
Your grades run from 0 to 1000?\n\nTry: \n\n1000 x (actual score) / (maximum score)
81110
The same way you grade outlines for papers.
52591
The president must propose adgendas to congress. He must uphold defend and protect the constitution(unlike wiretaps, patriot act). He must be an excellent orator(search bush quotes). He must be an excellent diplomat and hold alliances(bush sr. did at least).\n\nHistorically,\nbeing white, protestant, and rich are unofficial helpers.
654734
That's what happens when you have a president whose average grade was a C in college... just a dumbo, DOIHH...
939105
I think what there needs to be is test for voters.  You should have to prove that you know the issues and what the candidates stand for.  If we had educated voters, instead of 'rock the voters' we wouldn't have to be so concerned about sub-par people becoming president.  Elected officials are just a reflection of the population as a whole.
1055939
Depends how you define respectable.  This site (scroll down) breaks out scores for math and verbal.  You can take it from there.\nhttp://www.powerscore.com/gre/scoringscale.htm
71098
In my opinion ,you  should have Evaluation forms to evaluate sport people: you should put points or aspect for example:\nthe form:\nplayer's name: speed : power : accuracy : shots:.etc\n\n1- Ronaldo   :fast(80%): 85% : 90% ..............etc\n2- X         : slow 40%: 90% :90% ...............etc\n3- Y\n4- Z\n\n.\n.\n.\n.\ne\nt\nc
787624
Ask the President\nBye
187989
why are the students planning it and not the administration?\n\noh.  Just keep it simple.  Have the student with highest gpa give a speech, maybe have the class vote on a teacher to give a speech (maybe chose one that is retiring as a special sendoff for them too).  Nothing fancy.  When I graduated from junior high that's all they did.
248825
When I was in high school, the grades we were assigned were based on a scale of 1-100. For assignments like math questions, the number right divided by the total determined the grade. For assignments like writing compositions, the score was more objective, but there was generally a point value out of 100 given to the assignment. Most teachers had a scale that went something like this:\n\nA+ - 97-100%\nA  - 93-96%\nA- - 90-92%\nB+ - 87-89%\nB  - 83-86%\nB- - 80-82%\nC+ - 77-79%\nC  - 73-76%\nC- - 70-72%\nD+ - 67-69%\nD  - 63-66%\nD- - 60-62%\nF  - 59% and under
118753
go to a website where you can create a rubric....they have great suggestions which may work for you...your assessment should depend on what you actually taught and worked on....I'm thinking of edHelper or rubistar.....
820577
Anything you like\n\nBut here is some suggestions:\nUse him as a door stop or a paperweight\nenter him in American Idol \nnominate him as a presidency candidate\nnominate him as the secretary of defence
980095
Classical five-point discrete evaluation is the system most commonly used in the United States, but there are many variations. There are also a few schools, colleges and universities that eschew discrete evaluation (letter grading) in favor of pure discursive evaluation.\n\nHere is a common example of an American quality index, showing letter grade, qualitative definition and correlative quantitative value.\n\n    * A = Excellent or Superior; or top 10% (90 to 100, of 100) = 4.00\n    * B = Above Average or Above Average Expectation; or second 10% (80-89) = 3.00\n    * C = Average or Average Expectation; or third 10% (70-79) = 2.00\n    * D = Below average but passing (60-69) = 1.00\n    * F (or E): Failure or Exceptionally Poor; or bottom 60% (0-59) = 0.00\n\n\nso 2.8 is between B/C
149075
this are called ratings and r denoted by (*****) it is a type of grade
139128
An IQ rating is as good as the test measures.\nIntelligence is not so easily defined.\nI think all men are created with the same brain functions.\nTherefore the capacity has great potential. Most people do not realize the fantastic capacity that their brain have.\nHow the brain is used depend onthe person's culture and motivations.\nOn that note ,I believe that all humans (unless brain )damaged ) all have the same ability to use it.\n\nA President knowledge and inteligence  is as good as what his advisors give him.\n\nSome dont take advise and some are foolish.\n\nSo the intelligence of a President is Advisor dependent.\n\nWe cannot judge which country has a better inteligent President.It a cultural Preference. What is considered stupid by One is considered Inteligent by the Other!