a brain rumor is operated and then radiated but it is pressing on the optical nerv. can it break the nerv?
338286
Both may be correct.\n\nA benign tumour will be unlikely to invade the optic nerve, but it will compress it and stop it working, by "strangling" the axons.\n\nIf the tumour is malignant, it can also invade other tissues; extend along the nerve sheath, etc.\n\nI would also worry about the radiotherapy damaging the nerve, and other surrounding structures; a type of "collateral damage", as the military call certain civilian deaths.
1125469
Of course, but not today.  Last night, my neighbors were abducted right in the middle of a game of gin rummy  We were just having such great fun when the beam of light shown through our side window.  It fell on Bob and Janet.  Oh, the surprised look on their faces! In a flash, they were sucked into the light and off into the wide black yonder.\nWe waited a few minutes and then had to re-deal.
632899
No, it uses sound waves to form a visualisation of matter.  It hurts noone.  Best wishes
1091417
Fascinating question! The surface of the vibrating object would alternately cause reflected light to red shift and blue shift, but that's about as far as my thinking can go. Would the shifts cancel each other, rendering the object invisible?
21499
If you were able to create a device that created a strong enough gravity field to suck in light, it would have the power to suck you in as well.\n\nSo, THEORETICALLY, it could be possible to construct such a device, but turning it on would be fatal.
243484
Yes in my class of biophysics test program that it emitted sound and you must had to press a key when listen sound. Similar experiment exist for hand-eye. You must had to press a key when light appeared in the screen. And the results was the women had a time response more rapid that the men! This is know for the owners commercial stores and they contract women like tellers!
957093
Our thought are information and dependent on the physical reality of brain. You can not project your thoughts beyond the confines of your brain, unless they are piggy-backed on a transfer wave, such as the intelligence of radio waves is piggy-backed on carrier waves; all physical. You are confused, because instead of getting a proper education in these matters, you wish to believe some form of " alternative " explanation to reality.
133961
It was a so called experiment in the Philadelphia ship yards to make a ship invisible by using electromagnetic radiation to bend light around an object. \n\n"The experiment was allegedly conducted by one Dr. Franklin Geno (or Rinehart) as a military application of Albert Einstein's unified field theory, or "generalized theory of gravitation". The theory, briefly, postulates the interrelatedness of the forces that comprise electromagnetic radiation and gravity. Through a special application of the theory, it was thought to be possible, with specialized equipment and enough energy, to bend light around an object, rendering it essentially invisible. The Navy considered this application to be of obvious value in wartime (as the United States was engaged in World War II at the time) and approved and sponsored the experiment. A Navy destroyer escort, USS Eldridge (DE-173), was fitted with the required generator equipment at the Naval Yards in Philadelphia.\n\nTesting began in the summer of 1943, and was initially successful to a limited degree. One test, on July 22, 1943, resulted in Eldridge being rendered almost completely invisible, with some eyewitnesses reporting a "greenish fog" — however, crew members complained of serious nausea afterwards. At that point, the experiment was altered by the request of the Navy, with the new goal being invisible to radar only.\n\nEquipment was not recalibrated, and the experiment was performed again on October 28. This time, Eldridge not only actually became almost entirely invisible to the naked eye, but actually vanished from the area entirely in a flash of blue light. Concurrent with this phenomenon, the U.S. Naval base at Norfolk, Virginia, just over 600 km (375 miles) away, reported sighting Eldridge offshore for several minutes, whereupon Eldridge vanished again and reappeared in Philadelphia, at the site it had originally occupied — a supposed case of accidental teleportation.\n\nThe physiological effects on the crew were profound. Almost all of the crew were violently ill. Some suffered from mental illness because of the experience — behavior conforming to schizophrenia is described in some accounts. Still other members were missing — supposedly "vanished" — and allegedly five of the crew were actually fused to the metal bulkhead or deck of the ship. Horrified, Navy officials immediately cancelled the experiment. All of the surviving crew involved were discharged; in some accounts, brainwashing was used to make some crew members forget about the details of their experience."
66479
No Way Man!  Photon-photon scattering?  Highly dubious.  Photons don't have charge. They don't self-interact, that's why the electro-weak theory works so well... right?\n\nResponse to Dr. Bob's response:\n\nI agree that this process occurs (although a photon that decays into a e+e- pair has to be close to another mass so momentum can be transfered; isolated photons cant decay into e+e-).  But in such a case, would you really say that "one light ray has bounced off another?" I'd say that it was "bouncing" off the electron/positron pairs.  Just semantics I suppose.
576804
it's working now.  but all you see is a single frame of something white entering the screen from the right.  the next frame is of an explosion, with no sign of the tail or anything.\n\nthe second link you posted is much more informative about the pentagon attack.
255650
Yes.  Or at least it can by using deep level optical spectroscopy (DLOS).  See the reference below:
1151404
If the deflection surface has any diffraction or diffusion to it, the light may just be redirected imperfectly. 12kV? Jumpin Gigawatts!
208152
This is absolutely not true. Some comments:\n\n1. If this has been the subject of some multibillion-dollar investment by the government, why have we not heard something about it? \n\nIt is very hard to keep very large things a secret. They could not keep the atomic bomb a secret. What makes you think that they could keep this a secret? \n\n2. If this works, why don't Wall Street firms, with their phenomenal resources, use it? \n\n3. Under what principles would it work? There is no known physical laws that would allow this to be true. \n\n4. If this is true, why is this not the subject of intense interest and scrutiny in academia, in the US and other places?\n\n5. If this is true, why have we not caught Bin Laden? Why did we not know about the WMD program in Iraq? \n\n6. Looking at the summaries and reviews of Joseph McMoneagle's book on remote viewing on amazon.com mentioned above is instructive. At least half of the reviewers were disappointed (even those who believe in remote viewing) because there was no step by step set of instructions describing how to do remote viewing in this book. This is in spite of the fact that this is what this book claims to do! \n\nIn addition, McMoneagle claims that the Stargate project for remote viewing is some sort of ultra-classified government program for spying. If this is true, McMoneagle would never be allowed to publish this book, and would be in prison right now for writing it. Instead, I am sure that any members of the US intelligence community, if they are even aware of this book, probably can hardly contain their laughter. I find it hard to believe that this program was ever a serious program or yielded any benefits, if it even existed. \n\n7. Isaac Asimov did some testing of remote viewing, and found that 46% of the predictions produced by those using remote viewing were incorrect (see reference).\n\n8. James Randi looked into 65 claims by remote viewers, and found that only 1 was not obvious, or available in reference books.   \n\nAny way you look at this, remote viewing is too fantastic to be true. No one can tell you how it works. No one can prove to you that it does work. There is no evidence that anyone is using it, only unsubstantiated rumors. \n\nIt just sounds romantic, so a lot of people want to believe it. The more interesting question is, why do people insist on believing such twaddle?
592273
Probably a similar thing to that which happens when you reach the sound barrier.  I'm sure the light particles/energy build up and will create an explosion.
1105534
That would completely Suck without a doubt !\n\nIt sounds like something that supposedly happened to a few navy personal in an experiment called  " Project Rainbow ": otherwise known as " The Philadelphia Experiment ". \n\nListen to how a supposed surviver describes this ordeal:  Warning the content is graphic in nature.\n \n"When we switched the generators to full power,  it  had  created a strong  electromagnetic  field, which totally overcame and engulfed us within a heavy fog or a mist. It was at this precise  moment that  I  sensed myself being shook  violently  from a strong vibration and at the same time I noted the ship disappearing from around and below me. With a generator to  my back,  all of a sudden as if in slow motion, I felt a tremendous impact  in  which I sensed my entire  body being  propelled outwards  into hundreds of fragmented pieces. With this impact, there  was a brilliant flash of light, so intense it was  not only blinding, but consuming; the piercing sound forced me to the ship’s deck covering my ears with my hands in a desperate  attempt to relieve the pain. Now bleeding from my mouth, nose and ears, nothing seemed to help the discomfort  that   I was experiencing,  leaving me with  the one  and only thought  I repeatedly recall saying to myself — “I wished I  were dead”!"\n\n "Twenty-seven of the 40 were men embedded within the structure of the ship, but who were not in all cases dead. Mercifully some were shot in the head using a standard military pistol, yet others were kept alive long enough for laboratory research." \n\nSee web page for the complete story:
490702
That's because its supposed to be secret! Something like the frequency and much more. We aren't permitted to braodcast anything above permitted frequency, as a part of general public. (Frequency emission includes, usage of home-RF devices) Please make sure to get information from the military if you are making a geniune effort, other than, putting the stake at risk!
948795
Actually it wasn't the plans, but a computer operated machine that could accurately cut the necessary contour on a sub propeller to make it difficult to detect because it was so quiet and gave off a very small acoustic signal.\nThe US government had asked Toshiba not to do it but they went through with it anyway.  \nI don't believe it was a ruse by the US.  I think it was Toshiba trying to make a buck, damn the consequences