Who would win in a war? Britain or France?  NO NUKES OR ALLIES?
340004
are you serious?? i think if the french ARMY encountered one battalion of the Royal Marines they would defacate in their ugly uniforms and surrender... or they would try to call the US and THEN surrender...
19690
who would win?  nobody.  nobody would win.  there would be millions dead on both sides, and everybody in the entire world would lose.
736809
If Hitler hadn't attacked Russia, they would have been very suspicious allies. Germany may have put Britain out of the war and captured more of Africa and the Mideast. With all that captured by Germany, the US would have concentrated on the Pacific war. I don't think Germany could do a trans-Atlantic invasion, especially if the British scuttled their navy or sailed to the US to be the "Free British". The Germans had very few ships. After 1945 there would have been a US-German cold war.
939518
France:\n\never have chicken cordon blah?
292853
Great Britain no contest
504324
~The only way that Germany could have won would have been with the support of the US and by tapping into US industrial might, just as was the case  with Britain and France.  The good thing about sitting on the sidelines until the fight is almost over is that the Johnny-(Sammy)-come-lately gets to pick the winner.  \n\nThus, the occupation of Moscow would have been shared by the US and Germany and the cold war would have been unnecessary.  Britain would have retained some semblance of its present self, but we wouldn't have had to suffer the Lady Di crap. Most likely, Britain would have pulled an Italy and switched sides.   The rest of Europe would be the non-entity it is and was, with US and German troops ever present to keep it that way.  Lech Walesa and Solidarity would never have happened.  The Berlin Wall would not have come down because it would have never been built.\n\nThe trip to the moon  would have happened sooner and much more efficiently.  Synthetic fuels would be the norm rather than the exception.  The Euro would have come into being 5 decades sooner.  The Common Market  would have come into being much sooner, under a different name.  Italy would still by a nice place to visit, but not much else.  The Soviet Union would have been an Anglo-American-German colonial protectorate.  Israel would not exist, Algeria would have gained independence much sooner and Nasser would not have had to, wanted to or needed to nationalize the Suez Canal.  Qaddafi and Idi Amin would have been tending camels rather than running puppet-governments for super powers.  Korea would have been left to the Koreans.\n\nIn exchange for a US alliance, or peace with the US, Germany would have terminated its treaties with Japan.  The Japanese markets and materials would have been replaced and exceeded by the products and profits from the west, with  whom the Germans were much more kindred.  Hiroshima and Nagasaki would still have the distinction of being the only places on earth to have been nuked, but Uncle will have his day.  Chiang may have stayed on the mainland, but, if not, Mao would have been even less significant than he was.  Nam would have been unnecessary.\n\nThe Middle East would have been subjugated and Sadam and the Shah would be meaningless footnotes in history.  We would still have pillaged Middle Eastern oil, but Opec wouldn't have been able to stop us.\n\nThere is a reason that one of the US's strongest allies today is Germany.  Hitler was an anomaly.  The US and Germany are as tight today as they were when Von Steuben trained the Troops at Valley Forge, and Britain and Germany share more history and monarchical families than any other two nations in European history.\n\nHitler would have been talked away from his racial policies, but not too quickly.  The rest of the world was never really too upset with the camps and the death of 6 million Jews and 9 million others who died in them anyways.  Certainly not the US, who had exercised similar policies with Native Americans and who was pondering what could be done to quash the  Afro-Americans, Eastern and Southern Europeans  and Asians who were making foolish noises about equality and justice and  whose backs were no longer needed in the mills,  in the fields, in the factories and on the railroads.\n\nIn short, not much would be different today.  The names and places of history might be different, but your life would be pretty much what it is.\n\nSo why do you ask?
404732
The role of Germany was to conquer the world. Italy role had no role because every time Italy did something Germany had to saved them. British was try to protect Poland and Stop Germany for taking Britain. USA roles was to get revenge on japan and help Britain. Japan want to conquer the pacific. The soviet roles was to stop the Germany's.
276497
cgalloway1973 is right, I'm British, and believe that we are just as capable as the Americans. BTW, to the guy who mentioned that we were (supposedly) kicked out of every country we conquered, you're wrong! It's true that we were kicked out of a few of the Nations, but we decided to give most of them back by free will alone! This inter-nation rivalry has to stop, WE'RE ON THE SAME BL**DY SIDE!!! That saying, "all the gear, but no Idea" is just a bit of friendly banter, but there are a few people here who take it too far.
365483
IMO the UK also knows that the only nation that they can truly count on if they need military help is the US.
560944
I don't know any Americans who think that, but it's nice to know that British people want all the credit. It wasn't dependent on any one single country. It would have been impossible for Britain alone (or America alone) to defeat all of the Axis powers of World War II. There were so many countries on the Allies side that helped defeat Hitler. Even people in Germany helped. Here is a list of all the countries that participated in World War II and I think that credit should be given to every single one of them.
984860
I would say the England because during that time it rose to become the ruler of an empire that the sun never set on).\n\nGood Luck!!!
29314
If you mean "invaded but not conquered" then Russia.\n\nIf you mean "not invaded" then England.\n\n(Just like Hitler)\n\nRussia, Scandinavia, British Isles, most of Portugal, the Balkans, Greece, north Africa, Slavic countries, Asia Minor. Tahiti.\n\nNapoleon did not hold onto much of what he conquered.
969207
The US. Japan's army is small and not able to beat us.  There is a treaty with Japan that they will never wage war against us again FYI.
633737
I'd have to say the U.K., although Israel is a good ally too. Unfortunately, the Iraq war hasn't made us too popular.
415040
France....By far. Or Portugal
265244
England and Canada, our two best friends.  The US trusts them both implicitly.  The US, shared nuclear technologies, and the information on how to make nuclear weapons with both countries back in the 40's.  \nJust a guess, but unless you feel you are one hundred and ten percent safe with a country, are you going to share technology that could conceivably destroy your entire country?\nA lot of the US news stations will also have like "eye on England"  or "international report"  Where they have a news anchor from England who will give a few minute segment during each show.  Just to keep Americans up to date on politics across the pond..\nIf you want to test this,  As an American, go to say... France, or Spain... see how the people treat you, even if you are perfectly fluent in French or Spanish.  Then go to England or Canada, tho perhaps both countries as a whole are slightly conceited, they are both still friendly, and welcoming countries..  \nSo for me, yes its true. I believe there is a special bond between our countries, for many obvious reason, and some not so obvious.
818527
France....because:\n\na)  their uppity women have turned on too many of our men only to end up being a high priced tease of a date at evening's end.\n\nb)  if the invading US empire forces Frenchmen to shower at least twice a month, it will be seen as a humanitarian effort in a way that 'rebuilding Iraq' never will be\n\nc)  the war is likely to last about as long as a World Cup match and have a lower rate of casualities.