who is  the Chief Justice of the Supreme Cort?
345299
John Roberts, who recently took over for the late chief justice William Rehnquist.
178935
BLACKMUN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which WHITE, STEVENS, O'CONNOR, and SOUTER, JJ., joined. SCALIA, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, post, p. 623. KENNEDY, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which REHNQUIST, C. J., and THOMAS, J., joined, post, p. 628.
122932
1.William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice\n2.Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice\n3.Stephen Breyer, Associate Justice\n4.John Paul Stevens, Associate Justice\n5.Sandra Day O'Connor, Associate Justice\n6.Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice\n7.Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice\n8.David Hackett Souter, Associate Justice\n9.Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice
169146
TJustices sit according to seniority. The Chief Justice sits in the center. The Associate Justices on sit on alternating sides, with the most senior Associate Justice on the Chief Justice's immediate left, and the most junior Associate Justice seated on the right farthest away from the Chief Justice. \n\nIf you looked at the current court, left to right:\n\nBreyer, Thomas, Kennedy, Stevens, Roberts, Scalia, Souter, Ginsburg and Alito.
447018
Dr. Zahi Hawass\nSecretary General of the Supreme Council of Antiquities
590142
Nine. New appointee Judge Roberts is the new Supreme Court Justice.
366424
Not too many years after being President, William H. Taft was appointed Chief Justice to the Supreme Court.  Among the Associate Justices he worked with were Oliver Wendell Holmes and William Brandise. (spelling)
195451
Chief Executive Officer
140420
According to a real literal reading of the Constitution, it would just be the "Court."  It refers to a supreme Court, not as the title "Supreme Court" but just to mean the highest court in the land as compared to the inferior courts.\n\nSo, the head of the Judicial Branch is "the Court."
98389
The decision in Hammer v. Degenhart was rendered in 1918.  The following were the members of the Supreme in that year.\n\nChief Justice :\nEdward Douglass White\n\nAssociate Justices:\nJoseph McKenna\nOliver Wendell Holmes\nWilliam Rufus Day\nWillis Van Devanter\nMahlon Pitney\nJames Clark McReynolds\nLouis Dembitz Brandeis\nJohn Hessin Clarke
620561
Francisco Paulino Hermenegildo Teódulo Franco y Bahamonde (pron. IPA : [fran'θisko 'franko]; December 4, 1892 – November 20 (or possibly November 19 [*]) 1975), abbreviated Francisco Franco y Bahamonde and commonly known as Generalísimo Francisco Franco, was the Head of State of Spain in parts of the country from 1936 and in its entirety from 1939 until his death in 1975. He presided over the authoritarian government of the Spanish State following victory in the Spanish Civil War. From 1947, he was de facto regent of Spain. During his rule he was known officially as por la gracia de Dios, Caudillo de España y de la Cruzada, or "by the grace of God, the Leader of Spain and of the Crusade."
239967
There are nine judges on the US Supreme Court.  John Roberts is the Chief Justice.
1021782
Looks like 9-0\n\nBURGER, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which WHITE, BLACKMUN, POWELL, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. WHITE, J., post, p. 570, and POWELL, J., post, p. 571, filed concurring opinions. BRENNAN, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which STEWART and MARSHALL, JJ., joined, post, p. 572. STEVENS, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, post, p. 617. [541]
1187728
Yogesh Kumar Sabharwal is the incumbent Cheif Justice of India
250216
is a landmark case in United States law, the basis for the exercise of judicial review of Federal statutes by the United States Supreme Court as a constitutional power. The Court ruled that it had the power to declare void a statute which it considered repugnant to the United States Constitution. Chief Justice John Marshall presided over the case, and used the case to legally establish the right of the judiciary—and in particular, the Supreme Court— to overrule the actions of coequal branches of government and thus laid the basis for the current power of the Supreme Court.
1030893
Hight courts have jurisdiction over a State in India. The Judges of the High Courts in India are appointed by the President of India in consultation with the Chief Justice of India and Governor of the State.
658922
Here is a copy of the ruling by the Supreme Court:\nhttp://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/98-1036.ZS.html\n\nhttp://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/case/765/\n\nIf you would like to hear the oral argument before the court, it is located here:\nhttp://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/case/765/resources