4 way search clause.?
344155
It sounds like you already know this answer, really.\n\nYour friend is subject to a search of his person, vehicle, place of residence, and property under his control.  The two areas that could trip you up are the place of residence and property under his control.  If the police can make the case that either of those two situations apply to your friend when he's at your house, yes...you could be in "danger" of being searched.\n\nI'll assume your friend isn't there long or often enough for anyone to conclude that it's his residence.  That leaves property under his control (and to a lesser degree, property he has access to).\n\nIf the police can show that your friend has access/control of your kitchen, for example, your kitchen is very likely subject to search.  If your friend has just walked in the front door to your house, and the police walk in behind him, your living room is fairly safe because your friend has not yet had an opportunity to develop any access or control.  \n\nBottom line: the longer he's in your house, and the more of your house he has access to, the more of your house might end up being searched.  And if he happens to have a key to your house in his pocket, an awful lot of your house is probably going to get searched.  If you *never* let him in your bedroom, and you can convince the cops of that, your bedroom should never be searched.  It will really all come down to what the cops can articulate later as to why they searched an area of your house based on your friend's probation.  It's a tough hurdle to jump, but it can be done...it's just not all that common in my experience.
349423
good job, try ussearch.com
158392
Use the advanced search option to specify an exact phrase match. (although it is unlikely you will get the result you are looking for unless the address is part of a buisiness or user address that has been specified to be included in web searches.).
695980
Boolean Operators\nAND, &\nAND links two or more terms together to narrow a search. Only pages containing all the terms listed will produce a successful result. For example, Nostradamus AND prophesy will return results with both the term Nostradamus and the term prophesy in the pages.\n\n\nOR, |\nOR or | ("pipe") links two terms and collects all documents that include either term. For example, searching for design OR "graphic arts" will bring up pages containing one or both terms.\n\n\nNOT, !\nThe NOT or ! operator will search for records that contain the query term that precedes it, but do not contain the term that follows it. For example, searching for boxers NOT shorts will produce documents related to pugilists without mistakenly giving you articles about trousers that do not descend below the knee.\n\n\n( )\nEach of the Boolean operators described above will work on either a simple search term or a more complex query marked by parentheses. This allows you to construct very powerful queries. For example, "bed and breakfast" AND ((grapes AND California) OR "wine country")   and   ((hacker OR programmer) NOT "part time") AND (design OR "graphic arts")
461634
type that in a search engine
1172071
Tried searchin google?
155851
tax act 2004 type it in your search engine
281844
try doing a search online.
1118692
Type the question where it says "search for questions"
165580
That's the thing. The 4th admendment protects against "unreasonable" searches and seizes, not all searches and seizures unconditionally. Supreme court cases have shown that ... for example, your locker in school can be searched despite the admendment.\n\nI do not believe that any searches prior to getting on an airplane violate the letter, or even the spirit of the law. When you get on an airplane, your rights come secondary to the safety of everyone aboard that plane and the people on the ground who could be harmed if that plane crashes. \n\nThe 4th admendment is to stop the government from knocking down your door and looking for evidence without a warrant. It was from the days where writs of assistance were used to arbitrarily search people's houses.
538038
Go to Yahoo search and start entering different words until you find what you need.
334310
I can't see how searching before you move is a bad idea. Try this link.
749069
caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment04 \n                                                                                      05
624654
do a people search in yahoo, or google.
596289
checked google\ni agree with u\ncheers
958745
try to search in google.
254432
Is this what you mean:\nsearch for name on the page.