Are Americans looking for some more cover-up's from "BUSH" about the other CIA leaks that are coming out???
348920
Goodness sake! He declassified materials that were no longer necessary to keep secret, including the names of a number of agents who were no longer undercover, publically so.  He did so to clear up the slanderous lies told about his reasons for doing the things he does.\n\nWhat do the people trying to undermine our country do?  They try to find something in it to hurt him with, find this one event about an agents name, spin it to say that his government is doing something illegal (lie), improper (lie), or endangering an agent (lie), and when that all gets exposed for a lie, they run back to the fact that he said that he didn't leak her name, which he didn't since you can't leak names of people who are declassified and not meant to be classified in the first place, and blame him for "leaking the name despite the fact that he said he didn't!".\n\nNow you spread another seditious rumor about the public waiting for more cover-ups.\n\nMany U.S.A. citizens are waiting for the treasoning attacks on our country and elected officials, whether it's the attacks on President Bush or the attacks on Former President Clinton, or any elected official, to be held accountable and for the rest of the citizens to speak up against them.  We have free speech as well.\n\nSpeak your seditious words.  We'll answer.  The U.S.A. still stands and real patriots stand together against what you are doing.  We dissent, we disagree, but we don't spread rumors and undermine our own government.
1178990
I have been reading your questions on ask the planet as they come along during the day. You are really passionate about these issuse. I saw the report and I must say I see your point. Its like that movie, Vendetta with natalie portman. Did you watch it. Its very similar to what is happening right now. One person's terrorists is another person's hero. Im never quick to believe everything that is broadcasted from the American media. They are more about propoganda than truth. What can we do. American said they prefer Bush by voting him back in power. And he has successfully managed to manipulate you through the media. What the rest of the world is still asking... Where are the weapons of mass destruction?
600009
What is the question here? All I see is a lame-as sed rant about what you PERCEIVE to be true about the White House. I guarantee you there are a number of people on a daily basis saying "no". I haven't seen anyone get their head lopped off. And seriously, are you suggesting that it wasn't time for a new director of the CIA? LMAO. Get a clue.
1040289
Whoa... Damn ppl, reporting?! Harming?! Naming names?! I can't believe how everyone is buying into this crap... Yes, there's a problem, but it's been here for years. Everyone's got chill out, 'cause this is starting to sound like one of those infamous Red Scares again? What's next, are we gonna accuse of them being Commies? Public persecution? Are you actually afraid, or do just people love to get on the band wagon and bash everyone that the media tells them to? Bush, Iraq, and now Immigration, oh yeah gay marriage before that? You do realize the last two are just a little thing that Bush and his cabinet uses to get the focus away from his incompetence?
146336
To some degree the answer is "Yes", there is an ongoing threat of another attack somewhere in our country.\n\nThat being said, this is a very valid question.  To any thinking person, the Bush administration has lost most of it's credibility.  The old adage applies, "Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me".\n\nThere may have been a plot but I believe that what we've heard about it is probably exaggerated.  I think the real news story here is the timing between the disclosure of the "plot" and the controversy over the Domestic Spying Program.\n\nAlso, Jonathon Alter's column in this week's "Newsweek" discusses this.  Good reading.
1090880
I don't know but I'll tell ya what... My immediate thought when they broke into videos on VH1 with the breaking news on 9/11 was 'OMG'. My second thought right on the heels of that was 'Bush is gonna use this to go after Saddam somehow.'
975341
Hell yeah!  We need a probe into 9/11 that Bush is scared of releasing!  Just think about how many lies we've been force fed by this bastard administration!!!  It's going to be great to know why so many Americans have died because of this ahole!
1166349
Haha I didn't know they had internet connections in those caves, Mr Bin Laden.\nI hope you are hiding...because Bush is gonna get you REALLY soon. Better hide and shut up!
852963
If  I wanted to read the real story of Bush I would definitely not want to read the one put out by him and his family.  I would want to read the real story.  It is just like the news today.  Do I want to hear what the Bush news machine puts out, or do I want to really know what is going on.  Especially in his case, although probably true for most Presidents, I would not trust much of anything he says after being witness to so many of his tragic lies, like WMD, Mission Accomplished, etc.  If someone were able to even publish the Bush story, starting with Preston funding the Nazis up to the present day, it would be a wild read.  Give me the unofficial one every time.
1183599
Of course there's a conspiracy!\nProblem is it's never straight forward.  \nWho stood to gain form 9/11?\nThe Bush Admin given a reason to invade Iraq & take all that un-tapped oil.  Since then we've discovered that Bush's own brother held the Insurance policy for the Twin Towers.\nThe Israelis seen celebrating as the Buildings fell.  & The fight against Terrorism began in earnest.\n\nWho stood to lose?  \nThe rest of the World that's not allowed to criticise America & that Mr Bush Jr is a loose cannon, with a whole nation of Patriotic numb-skulls!\nWe wonder what he'll do next to feather his nest & damn the rest of us to an ensuing Jihad from Mr Bushs Duff foreign policy!
452968
you better turn your question to get real answers..\nDoes anyone know the amount of (true) Bush has told and the names of those telling him to tell the (truth)?
1123518
There is a "Department of Defense and FOX News", now?\n\nAha!!!!! I knew it!!!!!
348754
On the Today show Matt Lauer asked Chris Matthews about the effect on the president. He said "On a scale of 1-10, 10 being a deal ender and 1 being barely a blip on the radar, where does this story fall?" Chris said "heading towards 10". People are going to say the prez couldn't have leaked it because he has the power to declassify info. therefore he can't "leak" anything. That is the spin they're going to try to put on it. However, the prez through the v.p. told Libby to do it serreptitiously (basically do it sneakily). Don't ID yourself when you put out this story. Which raises the question, if the president really wanted it declassifed why not make a speech about it? Tell the public "im telling you something that was previously classified but im going to declassify it so you get all the facts" instead of leaking it to a NY times reporter. \n\nIt is yet again another representation of this administrations continual lies and cover-ups to the American people. The people who HIRED them! They will spin this story throughout the day so that probably by the end of the day, it won't sound so bad. The sad thing is many people will buy it. I sure hope we learn our lesson the next time elections roll around.\n\nI was highly disappointed when Clinton lied about Monica. However, I have always said (even before bush was elected) that I'd rather have a prez who lies about a b.j.(because hell, he IS a guy and I don't know many men who would fess up to something like that with thier wives watching) than a prez who lies about more important issues. Issues that can get people killed. Little did I know a few years later, I'd have that very guy as my president. It's sad.
563112
I was originally as surprised by this unexpected announcement last Friday as you were, planksheer. But as one of your subsequent questions indicates, we may have the answer: the "new" Watergate scandal. I think goss was up to his neck in the illegal gambling and prostitution ring that was being operated by these upper level ANP swine and bush threw him over the side as soon as his intelligence people made him aware of the facts -- and especially the consequences. \n\nThat said, bush may well not have been happy with his hand-picked appointee's track record at the agency. Reports suggest goss routinely butted heads with old guard CIA officials who basically refused to cooperate with him (and who can blame them?). Clandestine organizations like that operate best when upper level officials are more or less on the same page and no one is out to make waves or set himself up as potentate, as goss apparently attempted to do. We should know more about all of this as leaks begin spouting (i.e., very soon).\n\nAnd I share your concerns about this new appointee, gen. michael hayden. He is thick as thieves with Dr. Evil (aka dick cheney) and that alone is enough for me to wish him to never make it out of committee. The fact that he headed up the illegal domestic spying program would, in normal times, be enough for him not even to be under consideration. Indeed, he'd likely be fighting his way through court trying to avoid prison time. This country -- or at least the government alleged to represent us -- in its present state is clinically insane.
959211
It may be a leak from pentagon.....a convinient one...
421208
Go to the web site I have listed and start reading and looking at the videos they have used from the national news medias...what you will see and learn will shock anyone who looks at this information. Who actually planned it...I would win the bet if you agreed that Papa Bush and the CIA planned it all..now go look at this web site...
274082
Sparking an interest to your question, I am obliged to post what I believe is conspiracy at its best.\n\n9-11, I am going to say this right now, you may be offended by my point of view.\n\nWith reports going around, I cannot guarantee what I say is true or just rumors floating about the news and amongst the people.\n\nI've seen close up footage of the second plane colliding with the second tower of the Towers. Before the plane collides with the building, there is an explosion that erupts from the building engulfing the nose of the plane; yet the plane had not collided with the building yet. To me it seemed a little like Hollywood effects. When the third plane crashed into the Pentagon, I find it a little odd that the area the plane crashed into was completely deserted because they were "remodeling". While our nation was in a shock of awe from the "attacks", Bush was reading to kindergartners, with an upside down book.\n\nNearly hours after the "terrorist" attacks, the FBI released photos and full names of the hi-jackers. To top it all off, there was also surveillance footage of the hi-jackers in the airports. This kind of information could not be obtained and compiled to be released to the press within hours.\n\nCurrently, Bush is having an extremely hard time convincing half of America that Hussein had anything to do with the "terrorist" attacks. Bush's reason for invading Iraq is the fact that Hussein has Weapons of Mass Destruction(WMD's). While the search for these WMD's failed several times for Bush, he was becoming desperate. There were hidden reports that Bush was attempting to ship our own Nuclear Weapons to Iraq to use them as evidence against Hussein; but the weapons he was trying to ship weren't old enough to support his invasion propaganda. The only good thing Clinton did while he was in office was to dispose of all the Nuclear Weapons made in the earlier years.\n\nI've added a specific link below regarding the 9-11 conspiracy theory, I just wanted to put my two cents in.\n\nOn an unrelated note, there have also been whispers that everything we do will be recorded on video and audio tape, without our consent, in the up coming years.