What would the hypothesis be for...?
345621
Alkaline poisoning and Phosphorus deficiency causes electrolyte imbalance; thus cutting off nutrients which are absorbed by is roots(perfusion.) result-dehydration and decay.somewhat like Gas gangrene. Rx-Flush the Plant's roots thoroughly with H20 and don't give any more plant food.Wait and observe for any improvement. If not,you may have to replant changing the soil composites(debreding). If! the process of photosynthesis is functioning well, your plant will regain it's color/if not! it cannot be saved and will die.
1069794
Observation\n\nFormulation of Hypothesis\n\nExperimental verification of Hypothesis\n\nSubmission of Papers\n\nScientific Community acceptance\n\nGeneralisation of Laws and Theorems\n\nResults are reproducible.\n\nResults can be predicted.\n\nSubsequently, applications make the work useful to the masses.
138711
Are you going to explain that theory?
557287
If a theory can be proven, then it becomes a proven fact.  I suspect you'll find a lot of denial, even if someone could prove theories like this.
79989
Still more theory than fact.\nIt is responsible for the force of gravity.
885975
Good lord. I had to teach myself statistics, and I don't remember a lot of it, but I'll do what I can.\n\na) The null hypothesis is that the two learning environments have no impact on the grades of the course. The alternative hypothesis is that they will be different.\nb) Two-tailed, since you do not know which environment will be better or worse.\nc) The time spent in one vs. the other, and the quality of the teacher (as measured as a variable.)\nd) That there would be a standard margin for disparity.\ne) I have no clue. I never got that far.\n\n2) Don't know.
812331
A hypothesis is an idea you have that you want to test in an experiment.  It is an educated guess.  \n\nYour rationale just explains why you think your hypothesis to be true.  \n\nNow you have to figure out how to test this hypothesis.  How will you do that?   Determine who your groups will be.\n\nDo a YA search just for the word "hypothesis" and you will find lots of questions that have been asked before that might help you.\n\nBest of luck with it.\n\nPS  When I was in university I always found this sort of stuff difficult!!  :)
985241
The answer is:\n\ne) You have no supporting evidence for any of the above conclusions.
289170
To be honest I'm really not sure.  I'll have to pay attention next time.  \n\nI would be interested in hearing about your theory!
892708
Probably a t-test. \n\nTell us what hypothesis you are testing.
642956
I've you've got a hypothesis, test it.  If you find support for that hypothesis, write a paper and submit it to a peer-reviewed journal.
651960
... you don't have one.\n\nbut like any, the scientific method only allows for a hypothesis can only be disproved.
232311
Conspiracy theory about what?
390756
A theory, as opposed to a hypothesis, has a great deal of evidence supporting it.  To rise to the level of theory, and explanation must be internally and externally consistent, have no strong evidence disputing it, and have a preponderence of testable and relicatable evidence supporting it.  It is also useful if the theory is flexible and able to be fine-tuned based upon new evidence.  A hypothesis, on the other hand, must merely be a testable, comprehensible, and logical explanation of the known facts.  No real experimental data is needed for a hypothesis, but any fundable hypothesis, in order to be taken seriously, usually must have been experimentally tested to a point.  There is a large gulf between theory and hypothesis- A theory is very well accepted, has endured years or decades of attempts to disprove it (even, and ethically especially, by those who believe it), and totally explains the observable universe as it is.  A hypothesis can have nearly no experimental support, or a great deal, but is not supported strongly enough or believed with a strong enough consensus of the cogniscenti to be elevated to theory.  Theory is usually as far as anything can be elevated, because in order to be a law of nature, it must be mathematically proven beyond any shadow of a doubt.  Scientists of all stripes are so sceptical and cautious that almost nothing ever achieves this outside of mathematical proof.  Since mathematical proof cannot at this time be applied most of scientific theory, Theory is as good as it can get.
747645
A hypothesis is what you think will happen or what you are trying to prove.  There is no explanation of what you did in lab, but I am guessing that different people or groups of people did different things to the magnesium and the teacher wants you to see the different outcomes from the same substance in different situations.
697195
theoretically that is believed to be true
836230
Do some research and come up with your own theories....;