Is there any real evidence that President Bush did cocaine? Please cite information.?
336781
No. That was some of the same crap that came out of that Demacrook Billionaire in Texas that first came up with the forged military records on GW back when he first ran for Governor against Ann Richards. It got kinda revived when He ran against Gore but most of that died except for the CBS scam that ended Dan Rather's (and others) reigns over in left leaning media land.
146351
Clinton was far more articulate. His lies actually made you think 'maybe he telling the truth'. I assume that because he was a lawyer and thats what they do best. Bush has a Business degree. Thats why he always seems to be trying to 'sell' us something.
771377
The question we should be asking is this. Given that anybody allowed as close to Bush as Haggard has been is thoroughly investigated and researched by at least two agencies (CIA and SS), how can anybody pretend that they missed 4 years of drug sodden sex with a male prostitute. \n\nThere is no way Bush could not have known. Just like his father saying he was "out of the loop" when Ollie North sold military arms to Iran.\n\nYou can only play the "bad information" card so many times.\n\nNow, Bush wants to replace Rummy with one of his father's appointees from the CIA, the same CIA that he says is to blame for "bad information" which caused him to start a war in Iraq.\n\nNone of it is really funny, is it?
1007359
Ever since Bush has taken office (and especially post 9/11), gas prices have gone up drastically and oil companies have been posting record profits.  Recently even, the prices of oil per barrel have gone down while the price at the pump continued to go up, and oil companies kept reporting record revenue.  Their most profitable reported revenues (by far over previous), have all been under the Bush administration (whose family has been in the oil business for years and have good personal relations with the Saudi gov.)  I think it's obvious he's using the presidency for personal gain, maybe even revenge.  By the way, I'm an independent, and vote for who I think is the best choice, and even voted for his Dad in '92, but I think it's ridiculous Clinton had to go through what he did for lying about a personal life choice and Bush is getting off with lying that has cost people their lives and made him money.
36223
I will not apologise.  He said there were WMD's based on the fact that he knew where they would be. It's been two years so if he does find them it's more likely that the US planted them there!  Bush has lost all credibility on Iraq.
673663
I totally do not think that Bush is a good president. I recommend watching the movie Loose Change. It proves that 9/11 was a conspiracy, and that Bush knew about it. He let it happen so he could get oil from Iraq. Also, he is doing this new immigration law to distract people from raising high gas prices. This is my opinion.
1002711
1. The fact that it was Viagra was confirmed by his own attorney so that is not a rumor.\n2. Possession of a controlled substance of any kind without a prescription is a crime.\n3. When you enter the US you are subject to search by Customs.\n4. This is his second drug offense and is a violation of his plea agreement on the felony doctor shopping charge that he got last year.\n\nget your facts straight
584423
Allegedly yes.\n\nRemember at the time cocaine was considered a valuable medicine. Coca-Cola contained it and was named after it.\n\nHere is a copy of the alleged ad: http://boards.marihemp.com/boards/politics/media/75/75533.jpg
1128471
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=23059\n\nhow did we get ripped off?  read the entire article.  some is degraded but binary sarin shells don't degrade.   bottom line is it doesn't matter whether the stuff is useful today, it proves that in fact Bush DID NOT LIE about WMD's and Saddam obviously was being deceptive with inspectors by burying at least what has been found and certainly there is more.  There is strong evidence that much was moved to Syria also.
583048
According to an interview the substance he tested positive for was in some medication (I think, or perhaps it was a sports or health suppliment) that he got while in the States. In Argentina that medication or suppliment doesn't actually contain that ingredient, but in the America it does and he didn't know that. He also says that if he'd wanted to cheat he would have taken something a lot better because there were far better substances available if that is what he intented to do. I believe him and besides which he didn't need to cheat! He was a great player who made a mistake. Well, two- not checking what he was taking and taking cocaine (which certainly doesn't do anything for your game.)
1168558
We did do things like this until the democrats took over.  Once Clinton was in office, he put an end to these programs.  The reason is simple, he is a communist sympathizer and the communists in south american get most of their money from the drug trade.  Since that time, they have taken over much of south america.  If Bush wasn't such a weak president with no support for conservative issues, he would have re-instituted those programs.  He didn't. The result is the communist alliance of Venezuela, Cuba and Bolivia.  They are allying themselves with Iran in a clearly hostile manner and are positioning themselves to take over Mexican politics.  All funded with drug money.
562688
Wow, are you late to the game. What have you done in your past? Oh? You're not perfect? I seem to remember ex-President Clinton committing a crime WHILE IN OFFICE. Yes, perjury is a crime, no matter what the topic of the investigation. Oh, and not to mention all the rapes and sexual assaults he committed that got swept under the rug.\n\n\nYour hate for Bush blinds your judgment, fool.
884717
here is the cont. i found on the internet:\n\n\nAll he did was swing that hammer, time after time after time. "No, I've got this problem with my shoulder. I would be in constant agony if all I could do was break rocks all day," commented George.\n\nThe devil opened a third door. In it, Bush saw Bill Clinton, lying on the floor with his arms staked over his head, and his legs staked in a spread eagle pose. Bent over him was Monica Lewinsky, doing what she does best. Bush took this in disbelief and finally said, "Yea, I can handle this." The devil smiled and said "OK, Monica, you're free to go."\n\nThank you, I'm here all day!!\n \n\n^_^
870944
The is no need for evidence as to whether Saddam had WMD's, of course he HAD them. The U.S. sold them to him when he was an ally in the 1980's.As to where they are now, he used quite a few during his years in power before Desert Storm, probably used a few more since then. As to where they are now, if Bush and his boys weren't able to find them, is there a possibility that they are truly gone and Saddam told the truth, or is that not liberal enough a question?
212361
I think coke users started this rumor. If they can get enough people to believe it, they can claim to the court that the coke wasn't theirs but just those random traces that 'everybody knows' money is contaminated with. In other words, they are trying to make excuses to keep themselves out of jail. \n\nIt's similar to the rumor that crack causes aids. It's true, but they're thinking of the wrong kind of crack.
1033422
Dan Rather's story was not false, but the papers he used were. His story is true, George W. Bush was AWOL from the air national guard. As a matter of fact he was absent from the guard for about a year. No one in Alabama ever recalls seeing him. We were at war with Vietnam, to be AWOL in a time of war for more than 30 days is considered desertion and treason. He does not qualify to be president if it could ever be pr oven. He had the records destroyed when he was governor of Texas. Furthermore Dan Rather ought to be given a medal for attempting to inform the public. There is a million dollar reward put out there for anyone who seen George Bush while serving in the Alabama National Guard. Don't you think if anyone who served could recall seeing him they would step forward,. The reason he could not fly planes after 1972 is he refused to take a drug test on his physical, that is the year that the military implemented drug testing of servicemen in all branches. The Republican party does not want anyone to be able to prove George W.Bush was not in Alabama, they attacked Dan Rather on the only grounds they could the story was true, they did not deny the story, they stated the papers were fraudulent.
789478
What is all this bunk that Bush Lied?  Al Franken made these same comments on "Meet the Press" but he COULD NOT PROVE IT!  His only proof was, and this is pretty much word for word "because he's the president - he had to have fudged the evidence!"  \n\nALL of the evidence Bush used to convince congress to go to war, was collected under the Clinton administration, and was already WELL known by most of the ranking senators and congressmen.  The ONLY exception to this was the report that Saddam had been trying to purchase Uranium from Nigeria.  And this was collected by British intelligence - only later proven to be false.  The president has admitted, this last bit of intelligence was wrong, but his administration did not know that at the time!  And for the record, if you read the back pages of the papers (liberal media - burys it), the WMD's (mostly chemical) that Saddam was ordered to, and claimed were destroyed are being found all over the desert.  Not huge warehouse stockpiles, but banned weapons none the less.\n\nSecret warrentless wiretapping - from what I understand of this program, the wiretaps were only set on calls going to and from suspected terrorists OUTSIDE our country.  Listening to phone calls from suspected terrorists who are NOT citizens - and thus are not covered under the bill of rights.  The typical American has NOTHING to fear from this program.  This program actually helped to stop at least 2 known attacks, and who knows how many more, until a democratic whistle blower made it common knowledge!  If anyone dies in another attack that could have been prevented by this program - the New York Times and the whistle blowers should be charged with conspiracy to destroy our way of life.\n\nWhile the war in Iraq could have been handled differently, while numerous blunders have been made in the war on terror, and the Katrina response - Impeachment should not be used just because a political party disagrees with the president.  It should be reserved for cases where the president has demonstrated gross abuse of his authority, where the president HAS been found to be corrupt, where the president HAS been found to be lying.  Bush has made many questionable decisions, but as of yet has not done anything worthy of impeachment.\n\nClinton by comparison was investigated because of some shady financial dealings he and Hillary were involved with before running for President - Whitewater anyone?  Clinton also abused his authority as President to avoid a sexual harassment law-suite filed against him stemming from his days as Governor.  Both worthy causes for impeachment.  When it was discovered he was having yet another affair with Monica  - he was caught red handed in a lie to the grand jury.  Three strikes - usually means your out!