Is Bulgaria a terrorist  country  ?
348112
Terrorists in Bulgria? YOU'VE GOT TO BE JOKING! No one has EVER heard about terrorists in Bulgaria here. And I hope that here we'll never have terrorists!
233391
- there is no terrorist in world if no one intercept others life.\n- terrorism is really propagated by the bad policians of Americans and Europeans by means of hatred other religions particularly by suppressing muslims and the growth of their country.\n- terrorism really has no religion and terrorist activities is not belongs to a particular religion any more.\n- In any way Terrorism is acceptable.\n- The Americans and socalled "christian club"(europeans) alongwith Israel is in the bloody tug-of-war with Islam and creating Islamin terrorist world wide.\n- The Media which entirely controlled by the socalled and Americans and Europeans is portraiting as terrorist whoever talking against them. \n- But the real terrors are gaining their horrified terrorism as legal and legitimising it by cheating and paralysing billions of peoples on the earth.\n- Any Americans and Europeans have the right to use Neuclear power but no muslim countries. If some try to acquire then the country portrayed as "Axis of Evil" nations and spread terrorism.\n- They have rights to kill hundreds of thousands of innocent peoples including Infants, women in the name of war and in the name of spreading democracy.\n- What rights they have to spread their own culture to other nations..?\n- If they really help other nations and their people then no one will intend to raise slogans like "DEATH TO AMERICA".\n- Because the love is the great.\n- The drive towards "war against terror" is actually seems to be planned to spread terrorism worldwide and creating more terrors everywhere.\n- Because, now they got great chances to say and prove that Islam is preaching terrorism and Muslims are terrors, and so they can intrude and occupy any countries, suppress their people and growth in the name of Economic Sanctions and more.\n- They can achieve innocent peoples support through the misleading television media and make them to believe Islam is unrequired danger to the world.\n- Is this activities is not the Terrorism or more than that...?... what do you think.\n- There is really peaceful world when Americans and Europeans stop portraying other religions are harmful and avoiding the tendency to suppress other nations from their technological growth.\n- There is really peaceful world when Americans and Europeans stop intruding and RESPECTING the culture of other nations legitimate rights.\n- I dont want to say more... there is no terrorist and terrirism if Americans and Europeans mind their own business.\n- Why they always Americans and Europeans being the Hidden and Real threat to the Peaceful World...and being the real "Axis of Evil(Satan)"?\n- I never support terrorism.\n- Terrorism cannot be justified at any form.\n- Innocent people, let them be any religion, should not be allowed to suffer at any cost.\n- But remember the real Criminals are they who force innocent people to involve in terrism activities.\n- Let refine their (Americans and Europeans) interest on other nations.\n- Respect them.\n- Dont suppress other nations growth.\n- Dont let them push and force their own culture on other nations.\n- Stop wars on other nations.\n- Stop killing innocent people, children and women in the name of war. And dont create terrorist anymore.\n- Do you still think these activities are not terrorism. \n- And dont forget whoever talking about Americans and Europeans are portrayed as "enemies" "Terrorism breeding nations" and "Axis of Evil countries".... think how stupid the logic behind it... and when ordinary peoples can understand it....?\n-------------------
256746
NATIONALIST TERRORISM: \nNationalist terrorists seek to form a separate state for their own national group, often by drawing attention to a fight for “national liberation” that they think the world has ignored. This sort of terrorism has been among the most successful at winning international sympathy and concessions. Experts say that nationalist terror groups have tended to calibrate their use of violence, using enough to rivet world attention but not so much that they alienate supporters abroad or members of their base community. Nationalist terrorism can be difficult to define, since many groups accused of the practice insist that they are not terrorists but freedom fighters. Examples of nationalist terrorist groups include the Irish Republican Army and the Palestine Liberation Organization, both of which said during the 1990s that they had renounced terrorism. Other prominent examples are the Basque Fatherland and Liberty, which seeks to create a Basque homeland separate from Spain, and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, which seeks to create a Kurdish state independent from Turkey. \n\nRELIGIOUS TERRORISM: \nReligious terrorists seek to use violence to further what they see as divinely commanded purposes, often targeting broad categories of foes in an attempt to bring about sweeping changes. Religious terrorists come from many major faiths, as well as from small cults. Nearly half of the 56 known, active international terrorist groups were religiously motivated. Because religious terrorists are concerned not with rallying a constituency of fellow nationalists or ideologues but with pursuing their own vision of the divine will, they lack one of the major constraints that historically has limited the scope of terror attacks, experts say. Examples include Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda network, the Palestinian Sunni Muslim organization Hamas and the Lebanese Shiite group Hezbollah\n\nSTATE-SPONSORED TERRORISM: \nState-sponsored terrorist groups are deliberately used by radical states as foreign policy tools as “a cost-effective way of waging war covertly, through the use of surrogate warriors or ‘guns for hire.’” One important early case was the Iranian government’s use of supposedly independent young militants to seize hostages at the American embassy in Tehran in 1979. With enhanced resources at their disposal, state-sponsored terrorist groups are often capable of carrying out more deadly attacks than other terrorists, including airplane bombings.\n\nLEFT-WING TERRORISM: \nLeft-wing terrorists are out to destroy capitalism and replace it with a communist or socialist regime. Because they see most civilians as suffering from capitalist exploitation, left-wing terrorists sometimes have limited their use of violence to avoid hurting the victims they say they want to save. Left-wing terrorists sometimes focus instead on such tactics as kidnapping tycoons or bombing monuments. Examples are the Baader-Meinhof Group (Germany), the Japanese Red Army, the Weathermen (1970s America), and the Red Brigades (Italy).\n\nRIGHT-WING TERRORISM: \nRight-wing terrorists are among the least organized terrorists, often associated with neo-Nazi street rioting in Western Europe, especially in the early 1980s. These groups, often dominated by skinheads, seek to do away with liberal democratic governments and create fascist states in their place. Neofascist terrorists frequently attack immigrants and refugees from the developing world and are both racist and antisemitic. \n\nANARCHIST TERRORISM: \nFrom the 1870s until about 1920, anarchist terrorism was a major global phenomenon. Revolutionaries seeking to overthrow established governments launched a wave of bombings and assassinated a series of heads of state; one such victim was President William McKinley, killed in 1901 by a young Hungarian refugee influenced by anarchist sentiments. Some experts see signs of a new interest in anarchist violence arising out of the recent wave of protes
729966
can you site this... or are you using secret terrorist sources that you have?\n\nI would assume it's that they want to blow up Europe and America?\n\ncall me crazy...
627945
its possible\ngood for bulgaria? yes\ngood for anyone else? no
691660
Wow, what a big question.\n\nSometimes a country is forced into military action and something will get bombed, or shelled or attacked by other means.\n\nUsually the target will be military, but unfortunately the myth of smart bombs which drop from 40,000 feet onto a silver dollar is not true. Bombs and bullets often miss their targets and kill innocent civilians. Tragic but inevitable.\n\nThe government of your country however, as your representatives, do not go out deliberately to kill civilians for a number of reasons;\n\nThere is no point\nIt is counter productive in terms of propaganda\nIts expensive\n\nTerrorists on the other hand do not have the means, the support or very often the guts to attack military installations or other countries in the usual sense, so they sneak around blowing innocent civilians up deliberately.\n\nIf you look at the IRA they used to blow up shopping centres and pubs full of ordinary women, children and young people up - DELIBERATELY\n\nIf you look at ETA in Spain, they continue to blow up holiday resorts where ordinary fmailies from all over the world are relaxing on the beach. - DELIBERATELY\n\nHamas and all the other looneys in the middle east blow people up on buses to the shops, inculding school buses - DELIBERATELY  \n\n911 - Hijackers looked air stewardesses in the eye as they slit their throats with packaging knives, and looked a small girl in the face as they flew the plane on which she was a passenger into the World Trade center. They probably sat opposite her in the departure lounge and smiled at her as she played with her mother, knowing that they were going to kill her - DELIBERATELY  \n\n7/7 The Tube bombers sat amongst commuters in London and looked their victims (all sexes, religions and races) in the eye knowing that they were going to blow them into chopped liver.- DELIBERATLEY\n\nYou personally are a legitamate target for a terrorist. Doesn't matter what you believe, what colour you are, what religion you are, who you support or what your politcal beliefs are.\n\nYou are a target because one day you may be on the bus or train, or in the bar, where they have decided to leave the bomb. \n\nThat is the difference.
907005
Absolutely none at all, not that small problems like that have stopped them trying to assassinate foreign leaders,  de-stabalize small countries economies, cause wars, fund wars, fund terrorist groups just because they exist in a country where the government are friendly with anyone they dont like.\n\nThen they wonder why they are the No1 terrorist target on the planet. What worries me more is that President Bliar follows him like a lapdog all the time.
134867
other countries haven't said they were going to bring terror to our land
297346
Depends on who's defining  the terrorism.The forefathers of the USA were considered terrorists  by the English...
551768
As "one man's terrorist is anothers freedom fighter" I suspect that it depends more on your point of view than any 'fact'.\n\nPeace out
733442
really good question(one mans freedom fighter is anothers terrorist)this is just powerful countries propaganda,i agree\nwith you about oil and the dollar(changing to euros really\nhurt the USA. FACT)put it this way,just imagine someone\ntried to invade the UK and occupied us.some of us take up\narms and start a campaign of guerrilla warfare.we would\nbe labelled terrorists by some and freedom fighters by\nothers.its simply down to who has the power.I think this\nwhole world has been manipulated by bush and blairs\nlies about this war(they new once they got there ,people\nwould just forget about the lies and deceit and be glad\nthey ousted saddam)now they have a civil war on their\nhands.(but at least they have control of the oil and huge\nspoils of war.IE contracts for rebuild)I think our soldiers\nshould come home,to many have died already for some\nof the worst straight faced liars on the planet.
1115608
Absolutely! What produces terrorism abroad produces ultra-right wing conservative here. Don't believe me? Look at James Dobson, one of the most vile human beings on the planet.
947253
In the dictionary, terrorism is defined as "The systematic use of terror, the deliberate creation and exploitation of fear for bringing about political change".\n\nIn the UK, under the Terrorism Act 2000, a terrorist, for example, is defined as a person whose "action... or threat of action" is "designed to change government policy" and is done "for political, ideological or religious reasons". This means a peaceful protester on a street corner can, under this law be called a terrorist.\n\nIn practice, the definition or terrorism depends on who's doing the defining.\n\nLibyan bombers attack a Berlin discotheque and 2 American GIs are killed - this is called terrorism. The U.S. bombs two Libyan cities in retaliation. More than 60 civilians are killed in the retaliatory bombing, including Libyan leader Muammar Qadaffi's baby daughter. This is not terrorism.\n\nThe bombing of Pan-Am flight 103 over Lockerbie is rightly considered terrorism. The Libyan men responsible are tried, conviced and imprisoned\nCubana Airlines Flight 455 is bombed in 1976, killing 73 people. The man suspected of this bombing, Luis Posada Carriles, is given asylum by the US Government despite his porven involvement in the bombing of hotels. They do not acknowlege him as a terrorist - why?\n\nFrench attacking occupying German soldiers in WW2 - legitimate resistance.\nIraqis attacking occupying US soldiers - terrorism.\n\nA Palestinian attacking an Israeli army outpost is called terrorism. Israeli planes firing missiles into densly populated Palestinian civillian areas - self defence.\n\nThe real definition of terrorism seems to be this - terrorism is violence committed by those we disapprove of.
932472
yes yes .........\n\n\npakistan is organising terrorists and sending them to INDIA n AFGHANISTAN pakistan is enemy of indian and afghanistan yet \neven the ppl of the country too\nthey dont want to let india or afghanistan to develop \nas everyone should know afghanistan is first south asia country who have lots of energy , gas ., petrol, and 100% antics thgs and budhs as some ppl knows one long long budh in one city of afghanistan BAMYAN so they pakis organised terrorists and send there and they dont let afgh to be improve \nso now u said AL-QAEDA TALIBAN first they r not muslims the realy muslim is not like this ALAH sai dont u dare ever kill any civilian any one even hidus and christians ok and\n everyone should read and\nlearn QURAN  SHAREEF...................\nmy mom is from india but my dad is from afghanistan
1152923
It plays the terrorist role
1036941
Bulgaria lies in the continent of Europe.
892468
a few countrys have already i think if it helps then yeah but another one will just pop up if terrorist do use services like. that  but i  think there using skype lol