Who was behind the Danish Cartoons?
351749
We should all know by now. Read what I have to say if it's still not clear.\n“By Way of Deception – thou shalt do war”, as ex-Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky reveals is the official motto of Israel’s Mossad\n\nDoes Zarqawi Really Exist?\n\nDoes Abu Musab al-Zarqawi really exist? If he does, could he be serving Israel, the U.S.A., and other Zionists Imperialist interests? One should question how come the U.S managed to capture Saddam Hussein, a president of a country, who used to have palaces with gold toilet bowls, but have failed to capture ‘Zarqawi’, a guy who would be running away in sandals in the sand. The answer is simple: if ‘Zarqawi’ does exist he would have been created by Mossad and the CIA to serve their purposes and is still free to carry out his terrorist activities. \n\nThe ‘Zarqawi’ myth has been invented to cause sectarian violence in order to achieve the goals of the Zionist Imperialists, which is ultimately to divide and conquer. The Zionists Imperialists first reason to attack Iraq was because of WMD, which by now we can all agree was nothing but a huge lie. After failing an attempt to try smuggling some biological chemicals from Kuwait to Iraq to cover up their lies, they came up with another tool called ‘bringing Democracy’. This tool was going to be used to raise another puppet. After failing to do so, as they were disappointed after the result of the election in Iraq, they got desperate and, as usual, they chose their number-one skill, which is terrorism and violence. They dispatched ‘Zarqawi’ to intensify terrorist attacks in order to delay forming a unity government. That is exactly when ‘Zarqawi’ intensified his attacks. This time they really got desperate by targeting women and children of a specific sect (the Shia) and their holy shrines, hoping to cause a civil war using similar tactics previously used all over the world and throughout history. Another simple way of understanding these Satanic methods is to see who is benefiting from these actions. \n\nTerrorist Attacks in Iran\n\nIraq is not the only country who is their victim. Bombings in Iranian cities, including the recent bombing in the south-western city of Ahwaz on January 2006,  were also another example of false flag operations aimed at causing conflict between sects in that country. Later, an investigation by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) found that British agents were the root causes of such barbaric methods. Thanks to them for unearthing the truth. Most of the time such investigations are blocked since the investigators are part of these criminal activities. \n\nEgypt’s Election Manipulation\n\nIn Egypt yet another false flag operation happened in Cairo April of 2005, right before the election. Right after it Hosni Mubarrak’s regime started to crack down on Islamic parties who were his opponents. He did in fact benefit from these circumstances. Could he have been orchestrating these actions with the help of Mossad and the CIA? \n\nLying in London and New York\n\nDid the July 7 London bombing crack down on Muslim communities who were rising side by side with other citizens looking for the truth and questioning their government for the illegal war in Iraq that was being justified by lies? The bombing diverted attention from internal scandals of the Tony Blair government, including Britain’s plans to go to war with Iraq well before September 11 of  2001.\n\nKnowing all this, can we conclude that the September 11 attacks on New York benefited the Zionist Imperialists? Right after the attack, the Zionist regime of Israel started massacring innocent Palestinians in Jenin refugee camp?  The U.S.A., on the other hand, was going to war on the pretext of a “War on Terror” in order to control the world’s most important energy fields in the Middle East, fearing the rise of China’s demand for oil. It is well known that the U.S.A. had pre-knowledge of the attacks yet did not stop them.
84016
-From the source quoted below...\n\n"Controversy over the publication of images depicting Mohammed in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten has erupted into an international furor. While Muslims worldwide are calling for a boycott of Denmark and any other nation whose press reprints the cartoons, Europeans are trying to stand up for Western principles of freedom of speech and not cave in to self-censorship in the name of multiculturalism and fear."\n\n"While the debate rages, an important point has been overlooked: despite the Islamic prohibition against depicting Mohammed under any circumstances, hundreds of paintings, drawings and other images of Mohammed have been created over the centuries, with nary a word of complaint from the Muslim world. The recent cartoons in Jyllands-Posten are nothing new; it's just that no other images of Mohammed have ever been so widely publicized. "\n\n<snip>\n\nIt's also hypothsised that the situation was inflamed by the addition of 3 images that were NOT printed by the Danish newspaper.\n\n"Yet when a delegation of Danish imams went to the Middle East to discuss the issue of the cartoons with senior officials and prominent Islamic scholars, the imams openly distributed a booklet that showed 15 images -- not only the original 12 cartoons, but three fraudulent anti-Mohammed depictions that were much more offensive than the ones published in Denmark. It is now thought that these three bonus images are what ignited the outrage in the Muslim world. The newspaper Ekstra Bladet obtained a copy of the booklet and presented the three offensive images on its Web site (though not in an easy-to-find place). All look like low-quality photocopies."\n\nIt comes down to a clash of cultures and an intolerance of world views. Perhaps with a little provocation thrown in. I can't explain the level of violence though. Seems pretty extreme.
105097
Red background, with a white Scandinavian Cross.\n\nPicture's in the source.\n\nJust don't go around burning it ;)
161063
I'm not sure, but I think his main prophet was a cartoon character.
930895
+ I would suggest the archive section of the NY Times and others like that. Particularly the Political cartoon section. Many were expanded and used as posters.
176201
i read this on bbc world website, that before the denmark newspaper published cartoons of prophet mohammad , on of their cartoonist came to the editors with the cartoon of jesus but one of their editor rejected it by giving the reason that it will arose hate. then why did published the cartoons of porphet mohammad.  \n\nanother reporter said on the same website that islam prohibits to sketch the god and all mesengers which include mohammad, christ and moses. \n\nthen why not another people realize this. \n\nu can check this on bbc website anytime.\n\nand tell me who is rite
999496
How To Read Donald Duck: Imperialist Ideology In The Disney Comic\nBuy it here:\nhttp://www.akpress.org/2003/items/howtoreaddonaldduck
336896
Vikings (Leif Ericsson) from Norway or something. Scandanavia, probably.
1078034
It started around WW2 actually.  There are some propaganda cartoons out there on the net that would make anyone blush.
146985
Whoa there knobstick, your words make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up!  I don't think that cartoons of religious figures should be printed or sketched if it means the same thing as shouting '" Fire" in a crowded theater, ie...ignorant protesting with killed persons involved.\nBut where do we end the censorship?  In India we could never even look right or left, heck they worship everything there don't they? Air, frogs, matchsticks?
139650
Remember, the U.S. had nothing to do with that "cartoon"!  get over it.  You don't see Christians burning buildings and killing people when someone draws a cartoon of Jesus!  I have nothing against Muslims.  It's the radical uneducated jerks that need to learn tolerance.
521640
Some say that it was based on the politics of the time.  They would argue that the characters were all common themes in the editorial cartoons of the previous decade.
615220
Hamster\n\nHe was the only hamster in a cartoon.
111476
Look up daryl cagle on a search engine follow his blog and see them for yourself\n\nhere is a link\nhttp://cagle.msnbc.msn.com/news/blog/bloggifs/Mohammed-cartoons.jpg
857567
As far as I know, it stems from a humorous political cartoon from the 1800's. I googled the two and came up with this link, which sounds right.
579883
Well, *ahem,* that would be me.  I was walking through the streets of Denmark one day, passed old man 'Willards' house, up on Knot Hill, and smelt something the likes of which had my nostrils dancing and flairing outward that you'd a thought I was trying to talk through them.. So, I says to my buddy (my mule, at the time), "Something is rotten in Denmark!"\nWell, dangnabit, that mule went and told all his friends and well, there you have it.\nDirect from the source.\nMe
287298
You may find what you're looking for in the Toonopedia. It may take some searching, but this site has information on thousands of cartoons...\nhttp://www.toonopedia.com/