does anyone know anything about the greatest philosipher aristotle?
336092
Spillmonkey.com.. More news than you can shake a monkey at.. We...\nThat the great Greek philosipher Aristotle, after he had finshed teaching ... Alexander, had noticed the inferiority of the fork and the spoon, so\nhttp://www.spillmonkey.com/spork/index.shtml\n\nbcgrowers title\nIMO worms are some great and amazing creatures.As the greek philosipher Aristotle said "Worms are the intestines of the earth" Wow we have...\nhttp://www.cannabase.com/cl/bcga/chat/chat_mar1.htm\n\neBay Australia - Prints, Prints framed, limited, Contemporary...\n1900s ANTIQUE PRINT ARISTOTLE SCIENTIST PHILOSIPHER      US $7.99 <1m     Whalebones, Whitby      GBP 14.40 - <1m\nhttp://attr-search.ebay.com.au/_Prints_W0QQcatrefZC12QQfsooZ1QQfsopZ1QQgc...orderZ2QQsaatc...\n\nPlato Message Board\nANYBODY PLEASE HELP! · PLATO, ARISTOTLE,AND CICERO ON PHILOSIPHER KINGS!? tremons016 tree order\nhttp://mb.sparknotes.com/mb.epl?b=85&m=952325&p=2&t=281189&w=1\n\nAristotle Message Board\n...of PHILOSIPHER-KINGS tremons016 tree order ... Started on 11/17/04 12:27 AM 1 Reply last msg 11/24/04 6:57 PM ... 227 Views · Plato/Aristotle...\nhttp://mb.sparknotes.com/mb.epl?b=84&m=952335&t=281194&w=1\n\nLost Spirit :: View topic - gays marrying?!\nQuote: Originally Posted by golers671 first of all, theres something called Aristocracy, deriving from the greek philosipher, Aristotle.\nhttp://www.lostspirit.com/t399413p16-gays-marrying.htm
804463
This link should help.\nhttp://arthursclassicnovels.com/arthurs/philosophy.html
987222
I don't hunt, but I love your question Aristotle.
1110662
(excelent answer by Broadcaster !)\nLet me add some information too!\nAlexander (Greek “ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ”(ALEXANDROS) is considered the greatest hero of Greece. He was called great for several reasons.\n He was the first who managed to unite all the Greek states and build a gigantic Greek Empire which expanded from Greece to India (really big!!). He was the first person who took the title “Emperor of Greece”.\nHe made his small Greek kingdom of Macedon the most powerful Greek state. \nHe never lost a battle and he is considered a military genius.\nHe spread Greek language and Greek culture through out the world paving the way to Christianity.\nHe was considered from the people of the Persian Empire as a liberator and not a conqueror. \nHe fused Greek culture with Asian Elements forming the culture that was called Hellenistic (from “Hellenic” meaning “Greek”).\n{Do not confuse the ancient Greek kingdom of Macedonia or Macedon with the modern state of Makedonija (or FYROM or Slav Macedonia as they are not related at all). The confusion has started a few years ago because that small state started to use the name “Republic of Macedonia” causing a great confusion with real Macedonia in Greece.}
1183636
Idiot. See: Aristotle's writings.
240899
I would google the name Aristarchus.\nIf nothing comes up, try adding greek mathematician.
118718
The Memorable Thoughts of Socrates\n\nhttp://www.gutenberg.org/files/17490/17490.txt
410014
you can find out all about her here: http://www.philomena.org/\n\nHere's a little excerpt:\n\nThe very name of Philomena contains the words: filia luminis, daughter of light. She is the enlightener of a dark and corrupt age confounding the sneers of materialism. She is the Patroness of the Children of Mary. Her mission today is to draw us to the Immaculate Heart of Mary through imitation of her heroic virtues of purity, obedience and humility. Saint Philomena is an anchor of HOPE in this dark age of despair.\n\nThe rude latter days are here. They are clearly and universally marked by occultism, modernism, materialism, spiritism, despair and a general falling away from the Faith. Never have the powers of darkness been so strong, since the beginning of Christianity, as they are today. Saint Philomena is the New Light of the Church Militant! This title was bestowed upon her by St. Jean Marie Vianney, heroic confessor and patron of all parish priests.\n\nLittle, indeed, is known historically of Saint Philomena. Her real history commences when her blessed remains were found after having rested in the obscurity of the Catacombs of St. Priscilla for some seventeen hundred years. But God is wonderful in His saints, and Saint Philomena strikingly exemplifies this oft-repeated truth. After allowing her name and memory to be buried with her earthly remains for centuries, He suddenly brought the attention of mankind to this little maiden-martyr, and now works astounding prodigies in her name, as if wishing to show that He wills in this way to recompense the long time He allowed her to remain in obscurity.
638242
Socrates died 2,400 years ago this June. More precisely, he was executed, a criminal condemned on a capital charge. How seriously Athens took her philosophers! It fills the modern scholar with envy more than dread, that one could die for such a cause. The formal charge that cost Socrates his life—“Socrates is guilty of not believing in the gods the city believes in, and of introducing other strange divinities; and he is guilty of corrupting the young”—has set philosophers to offering apologia ever since, as if in defending Socrates from this charge philosophy can define and understand itself. Yet it might be that Lady Philosophy protests too much, that two thousand years of self–defense might conceal (at least from the unobservant) an equal period of self–doubt. If Socrates’ death had in it nothing but answers, it would by now be a historical curio, like similar tales in innumerable hagiographies. It is the questions about him and what he represented that keep his death alive.\n\nHe was a man of neither wealth nor personal beauty, the butt of the comedians of the day for his bulging eyes and swaggering gait. His fashion sense ran toward old clothes and bare feet. Even his admirers compared him to a satyr, an uncanny mixture of beast, man, and god. Yet this man, as famous then for ugliness as leading ladies are now for beauty, has been the Helen of philosophy. He launched a thousand ships, and his rival suitors have long been fighting an often bitter war hoping to take secure possession of him. Most of the major philosophical schools during the first six centuries after his death traced their origins to Socrates, and vigorously disputed other claimants to the Socratic legacy. Stoics, Skeptics, and Cynics all proudly claimed him as their founder and looked to him as their exemplary sage. The millennium and a half that followed, dominated by Christendom and then the “new science,” displaced him with other exemplars, but the Socrates Wars broke out in earnest again during the last two centuries. \n\nThe Enlightenment found in him a hero and martyr of autonomous reason, while Romanticism felt the burn of his old flame when it rediscovered irony as a privileged vehicle of philosophy. Even today these are the two interpretive camps with which the still disputing heirs affiliate. It is not the worst way to gauge whether philosophers are “analytic” or “continental” to ask them what they find most attractive in Socrates. In Anglo–American circles, the saint of reason is regnant; elsewhere Socrates wears the crown of the Compleat Ironist whose ruthless dialectic exposes the ways reason must inevitably undermine or (we might as well say it) deconstruct itself. Books and articles continue to accumulate, the love letters of the scholarly caste. This, too, is a love letter.\n\nSocrates had other ways to express his loves, and wrote no books. Our experience of him and his ideas depends almost entirely on the writings of three of his contemporaries, two admirers and one detractor. All three wrote in genres bound to frustrate every foursquare scholar’s desire to pluck out the heart of the mystery of the historical Socrates. Our oldest major source comes from the detractor, Aristophanes, the greatest comic dramatist of the ancient world. His caricature of Socrates in the Clouds, produced in 423 b.c., when Aristophanes was about thirty and Socrates in his mid–forties, is the only substantial source we have that was written by someone who knew Socrates but was not one of his devoted companions. This makes it a precious document. Many scholars dismiss it and are offended by what they take to be the manifest unfairness of Aristophanes’ portrait of Socrates. Indeed, Aristophanes’ portrait is unflattering, as would be expected of a comic caricature. But a caricature cannot have its intended effect unless its exaggerations are also revealing. The works of Plato and Xenophon, Socrates’ two greatest literary admirers
1031482
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EucliD,\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhaskara\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archimedes\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramanujam
209044
Here's a link about the Alexander Technique. From what I can tell, it doesn't have much to do with Plato.
594534
A GREAT KING NAMED SOLOMON, WAS THE WISEST MAN ON THE FACE OF THE PLANET.. HE WAS NOT JUST WISE, HE WAS SUPER RICH.  \n\nHE WROTE THAT HE HAD DONE EVERYTHING, HE BUILT PARKS, BUILDINGS, ORCHARDS, LAKES, HAD SINGERS, DANCERS, ANIMALS, AMASSED GOLD, SILVER, PRECIOUS STONES, HAD WIVES, EXTRA WOMEN (BY THE BOATLOADS), HE READ SO MUCH UNTIL HIS EYES GREW TIRED.  HE SOLVE GREAT MYSTERIES. FOR EXAMPLE..\n\nA TEST WAS GIVEN HIM TO TEST HIS WISDOM...\nHE WAS BROUGHT TWO BUNDLES OF FLOWERS AND ASKED IF HE COULD TELL WHICH WAS REAL...? HE DID NOT COME NEAR THE FLOWERS.\nAS HE THOUGHT HE CASUALLY ASKED SOMEONE TO OPEN A WINDOW.\nHE ANSWERED.  "THOSE ARE THE REAL ONES.. PEOPLE WERE SHOCKED.. BUT HE SAW THE BEE THAT LANDED ON THE PEDDLES."  THAT IS WHY HE ASKED FOR A WINDOW TO BE OPENED.\n\nHE HAD A QUEEN THAT CAME TO VISIT HIM, THE QUEEN OF SHEBA, BECAUSE SHE HEARD OF HIS GREAT WISDOM, SHE BROUGHT GIFTS THAT WOULD AMOUNT TO WINNING 5 TO 6 LOTTERIES AT ONCE... AND WHAT SHE SAW, FROM HIS WEALTH AND POWER, AND ASTONISHING WORDS OF WISDOM, EVEN DOWN TO THE CHEERFULNESS OF KING SOLOMON'S SERVANTS, TOOK HER BREATH AWAY. SHE EXCLAIMED, "OH KING, I HAVE HEARD OF YOUR FAME, WHICH IS WHY I CAME TO HEAR YOUR WORDS, BUT THE HALF HAD NOT BEEN TOLD"\n\nAT THE END OF HIS ENDEAVOURS TO FIND OUT WHAT WOULD FULFIL A PERSON'S LIFE HE WROTE, "HERE IS THE CONCLUSION OF THE MATTER.  FEAR GOD AND KEEP HIS COMMANDMENTS, FOR THIS IS THE WHOLE DUTY OF MAN."   (meaning mankind)
357551
i guess so euthanasia was a practise common at that time and aristotle being a philospher of that time wud have supportetd the fact bcoz there was no state of the art med facilitis over there and it wud be better for someone to die than to cringe on to life which is non existent \n\n\ni am  talkin of that time at this time 2006 he wud probably b against euthanasia
611091
Metaphysics (Greek words μετα [meta] = after/beyond and Φυσις [physis] = nature) is a branch of speculative philosophy concerned with explaining the world. A central branch of metaphysics is ontology, the investigation into what categories of things are in the world and what relations these things bear to one another. The metaphysician also attempts to clarify the notions by which people understand the world, including existence, objecthood, property, space, time, causality, and possibility.\n\nContents [hide]\n1 History of metaphysics \n2 Central questions of metaphysics \n2.1 Particulars and universals \n2.2 Change and identity \n2.3 Space and time \n2.4 Necessity and possibility \n2.5 Personal identity \n2.6 Abstract objects \n2.7 Other metaphysical questions \n3 Criticism \n4 Metaphysical subdisciplines \n5 Metaphysical topics and problems \n6 People \n7 See also \n8 References \n9 External links \n \n\n\n[edit]\nHistory of metaphysics\nOne theory of the origin of the word 'metaphysics' (in Greek, μεταφυσικά) is based on the organization of some of Aristotle's books in the Library of Alexandria. The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle produced a number of works which together were called the Physics. In the Library of Alexandria, the works of Aristotle were organized in such a way that another set of Aristotle's works were placed right after the Physics. These books seemed to concern a basic, fundamental area of philosophical inquiry, which Aristotle himself called "first philosophy". So early Aristotelian scholars called those books τὰ μετὰ τὰ φυσι κά βιβλια, "ta meta ta physika biblia", which means "the books that come after the (books about) physics".\n\nThe term "Metaphysics" covers the subjects addressed in those books by Aristotle which have come to be called, collectively, the Metaphysics.\n\nThe Metaphysics was divided into three parts, now regarded as the traditional branches of Western metaphysics, called (1) ontology, (2) theology and (3) universal science. There were also some smaller, perhaps tangential matters: a philosophical lexicon, an attempt to define philosophy in general and several extracts from the Physics repeated verbatim.\n\nOntology is the study of existence; it has been traditionally defined as 'the science of being qua being', where the Latin word qua is usally translated "as". Hence, in English, "being as being." \nTheology means, here, the study of God (or the gods) and of questions about the divine. \nUniversal science is supposed to be the study of so-called first principles, which underlie all other inquiries; an example of such a principle is the law of non-contradiction: A = A, A not = B, Not both A and B. In other words, the elementary laws of logic as Aristotle knew them. \nUniversal science or first philosophy treats of "being qua being" — that is, what is basic to all science before one adds the particular details of any one science. This includes topics like causality, substance, species and elements. It also includes topics like relationship, interaction, finitude and a theoretically boundless infinity.\n\nMetaphysics as a discipline was a central part of academic inquiry and scholarly education even before the age in which Aristotle coined the word. Long considered "the Queen of Sciences", its issues were considered no less important than the other main formal subjects of physical science, medicine, mathematics, poetics and music. Since the Age of Reason, problems that were not originally considered metaphysical have been added to metaphysics. Other problems that were considered metaphysical problems for centuries are now typically relegated to their own separate subheadings in philosophy, such as philosophy of religion, philosophy of mind, philosophy of perception, philosophy of language, and philosophy of science. In some cases subje
273069
try wikipedia article about AYN RAND
570510
Do your homework!  \n\nHe was a great philosopher who influenced the ideals of freedom and responsibilty in the Anglo-American experience.
334041
Your namesake, Aristotle.  He laid the foundation for Western thought and philosophy that freed the mind of mankind.  All of us in the West today still enjoy the benefits of his discourses.