what are the pros and cons between versign pro and authorize.net?
349424
Either one will get the job done.  I would personally go with the cheaper solution
400212
I recommend Scribus as a free alternative to MS  Publisher but if you only want more simple functions then open office. I use Scribus at school and think its very good. However, it was running on Linux OS and ive never tried the windows version. Wouldn't have thought there would be any difference though.
707764
VeriSign, Inc. is an American company based in Mountain View, California that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the generic top-level domains for .com and .net, one of the largest SS7 signaling networks in North America, and the RFID directory for EPCGlobal. VeriSign also provides a variety of security and telecom services ranging from digital certificates, payments processing, and managed firewalls to mobile call roaming, toll-free call database queries and downloadable digital content for mobile devices. The company groups all of these functions under the banner of 'intelligent infrastructure' services.\n\nTo hire them for availing any web based facility and transation please contact them at the following address or e-mail or phone. \n\nFor SSL, MPKI or MSS Products\nPhone: 1-877-438-8776, option 2, option 4\nor 650-426-3434\nbetween 8 a.m.- 2 p.m. PT\nE-mail: billing@verisign.com \nYou can also contact them at -\nVeriSign\nWorldwide Headquarters at 650-961-7500-
160481
sourceforge.net and download.com are good!
349453
There isn't much difference. IIS 6 has better support for the ASP.NET framework and certain authentication schemas, such as impersonation and the like, but that's about the only difference I've noted.
75615
No reason to risk the wrath of Microsoft Legal.\n\nTry OpenOffice -- it's free (open source) and will open anything that you can build with O2K3.
729638
I guess there is one software which attracted my attention.\nIts a Free one too !!!\n\nTry the PaperLabelMaker application by SyncEdit.\n\nhttp://www.syncedit.com/software/paperlabelmaker/
332998
You can try DesignPro of Avery.
391222
Depending on how much drawing vs image munipulation you want to do, I like Illustator CS2 and Photoshop CS2. But it depends on your level of profficency with such programs and how much time you have to learn it, not to mention how much you want to spend on a program. A more price considerate (and more user friendly from what I've heard, though I've never used it) altenative would be something like CorelDraw.
78679
When you visit a site, check for their security certificates. Some sites use security certificates from proven and trustee companies such as VeriSign. Usually these sites put the logo of VeriSign and the bottom of the site, where you can click and it will redirect you to a page at the VeriSign official website and give you detailed information about the sites security level.\n\nThese sites are pretty much safe, as for the others, all you need to do is watch yourself.
372509
I've been Web programming for over seven years and have used both.\n\nHands-down, Dreamweaver is the more powerful tool for Web editing, either as a beginner or an old pro. Dreamweaver makes making Web pages pretty much easier than FrontPage does, and there's practically no support for XML or CSS in FrontPage, while Dreamweaver has huge support for both.\n\nFrontPage does make certain server-side tasks, such as sending e-mail via a form, easier than Dreamweaver does, if you have FrontPage extensions enabled on your Web site.\n\nBut the final test is simple: Look at your favorite Web sites and choose View Source Code from your browser at any home page it has.\n\nFrontPage leaves a META creator tag that says FrontPage; DreamWeaver uses MM_ in the front of all the JavaScript it creates.\n\nI bet, on your favorite sites, you almost never see the creator=FrontPage tag, but you commonly see the MM_ in the JavaScript on those pages.\n\nVery few serious Web designers / developers use FrontPage. Many use Dreamweaver; now that Dreamweaver is an Adobe product, the number of people using it is only going to grow.
159784
Julz is wrong you don't get no Office with Pro. Listen the difference is in the features: Pro allows multiple layers of security, more powerfull backups, support for some protocol based advanced applications (networking) and a few more. For a few extra bucks I strongly suggest getting Pro.
12057
Without using GnuPG or PGP, there is no easy way to prove the authentication of a GnuPG signature. There is an external utility at winpt.org, which can verify signed files, but it will install GnuPG too. \n\nBut you could use S/MIME which is supported by thunderbird. You can get a certification via cacert or verisign.
896901
dont ever thinking of getting free license software. dont count on money, think about who create tat software. let them live....
34202
It depends on what you want to do.\n\nGraphic designers that I know seem to prefer InDesign, probably because that's what they used in school.\n\nQuarkExpress is the standard for desktop publishing.\n\nQuark is also much much more expensive than InDesign.  So I guess it really depends on what you want to do and how much money you can spend on it.\n\nI hope this helps!
71632
Smart Card Enrollment Agent\nNo certificate templates could be found. You do not have permissions to request.\nIf you attempt to enroll a certificate as smart card enrollment agent, you may receive this error message if none of the templates that are assigned to your CA requires an authorized signature. A certificate template must require in its issuance requirements, the signature purpose.\n\nYou may also see this error if the computer that acts as an enrollment station is not a domain member of your Active Directory forest. You cannot use a computer that is a workgroup member or a member of an un-trusted Active Directory domain. An enrollment station that is not registered properly in Active Directory will report DCOM error 10006 and error 10021 in its System event log.\n\nCustom smart card template is not available on the smart card enrollment station.\nIf an enrollment agent navigates to the Smart Card Certificate Enrollment Station, the certificate templates may not be available as expected. Several reasons could cause this error. One of the more common issues is when a custom template with multiple signatures is desired. To resolve this problem, see the Microsoft Knowledge Base article for resolution steps at http://support.microsoft.com/?id=313629\n\nAnother common issue is when the version 2 smart card template does not contain the proper purpose in the Request Handling tab of the Certificate Templates MMC Snap-In. The purpose must be “signature and smart card logon” for the template to appear on the Web enrollment pages.
368565
Microsoft dropped support for that a long long time ago. In fact with .net they abandoned Basic syntax pretty much copletely. What I suggest is switching to one of the new basics. \n\nPowerbasic is the closest thing to QB that still survives.  If you look in the Linux basic groups most of those also have Windoze ports. \n\nMost of these also have more power, features and stability than QB ever did.