What do you think of my plan for Iran?
337129
it might backfire when you find real nukes not only pointed at you (thats 'you' not us) but targeted directly at your personal anal passage. but as the highly intelligent girl above pointed out. you are not the real bush but some spotty little oik at his computer in his parents basement. nice job Poindexter. whats next? should we ban internet useage by children during school holidays? It may not address the Iran issue but it might stop rubbish like you posting utter bollox.
645238
Iran's destiny depends on Iran's actions. Follow the good path and good things will happen.
542731
#1 OIL-OIL-OIL-OIL-OIL-OIL-OIL-OIL-OIL-OIL- Shall I go on.\n\n#2 The fear by the BIG 5 Oil Companies that the Iranians would close the Strait of Hormuz and slow the PROFITS to them and the rest of the White House GOP BushPig sucking Cuntservatives. \n\n#3 To protect the Jews and Israel that the White House loves to throw taxpayer money at because it bounces back, right into their pockets. \n\n#4 Nukes are far from the whole reason but they are a part. Iran would have to know that their country would become a waste land if they attempted to fire on the U.S. first. Iran would fire a missile with ONE warhead and the U.S. would shoot back one missile with 10 warheads apiece for combined destruction of about 10,000 sq. miles of destruction or the whole country and contaminate the whole of the Middle East and Europe.
564024
yes iran should be able to have a nuke. and we should deliver it to them by air, and maybe one for syria, palestine, and turkey oh and no korea. good people in those countries should start packing up and moving out
1075773
It should be taken seriously, but to a point.\nIran restricting its fossil fuel sales would cause considerable price hikes of the oil pricing. The world won't end, but oil will become much more expensive, both for private individuals, for many nations and for private corporations. This would probably cause higher costs for oil-derived products and wasteful, energy-consuming activities in most countries, and a bit of inflation.\n\nOn the other side, you have to realize that Iran has little motivation to carry out this promise. If they rise the oil price or restrict sales, that means that they will be losing money as well. Iran's economy is quite dependant on its oil exports, and I can't imagine them substaining a high-price oil policy for a long time, since, for them, that would mean losing exports and money.\nThe truth is that Iran needs the world community as much as the world community needs Iran. Sure, we will always need oil, while they don't have an exclusive need to export it, what gives them the upper hand. But how far are they willing to take their threats? \nI'm not sure common Iranians would like their living standards reduced due to their economic dependency on oil exports. How much hardship are the iranians really willing to endure? Much of these are smokescreens and empty threats to see how the world community reacts, me thinks.\n\nAlso, we wouldn't be having this problem if Bush's and Blair's "pre-emptive strike policy" and pro-corporate war agenda wouldn't have scared the sh*t out of Iranian people and led them to elect the nationalist nutso that Iran has as prime minister. They've really done a good job, increasing terrorism in Iraq and turning a quasi-religious state into something even more radical and fundamentalist!
748031
I don't think saturation nuking will work, as that they won't penetrate the underground bunkers. The USA will just have to invade and risk yet another Vietnam. The invaders will all become junkies (20% of Iranians are on hard drugs) and when they lose they will have to admit millions of Iranian Shiite refugees into the USA. It's tough, I know, but there is really no alternative. The USA must stay the course. They can't let the terrorists claim victory.
46986
What we should do is to work with the rest of the world to isolate Iran. That would mean no trade with the country except for food. It would destroy their economy and send the message that the world won't tolerate their behavior. \n\nWhat will happen will be completly different and nothing will happen to Iran. Many countries are too thirsty for their oil so they will not support any sanctions.\n\nI think what we should do is to kill the top leaders of Iran. War is too expensive and sanctions do not work.
898713
I hadn't thought about this suggestion before. I think it does leave us in a position to monitor them but stay on their good side, which is key. We don't need to make the situation worse, for sure. Do you think Iran would be open to that? If they weren't, is that sign to the UN that their intentions are malicious?
656776
I say that you are crazy.  Iran cannot have nukes, no if's, and's, or but's about it.  They have vowed to wipe Israel off the map, and a nuke would give them the means to do it, and permanently.  A weapon that deadly in the hands of insanity is just that- insanity.
1168451
What I think we should do as far as a serious answer goes is: equip the Iraqi "army" with some modern equipment.  We then give the Iraqi government a 1 billion dollar loan.  We start to pull troops out at a rate of 100 per week.  By the time we get out the politicians will have agreed to this new idea.  Allow the Iraqis to pay back their loan in a steady river of oil until we all switch to something new.  The Iraqi people would be grateful and the government would become our strongest ally.  Iran would then try to make Iraq more like it, but we will be liked more.  We will economically be in a better position and there would be nothing to complain about.  The Iraqis will be able to defend themselves and it should all be good.
808128
As an Iranian, I should say you "Ahmadi Nejad"s speeches and letters are a bunch of his strange ideas, not all of the Iranian ideas.\n\nHere we don't concern to his strange speeches. I suggest you don't worry about Iran's activities in base on "Ahmadi Nejad" speeches and letters ;)\n\nIran and US had some dialogs but some US policies like invading to Iraq and Afghanistan and occupying those countries made this situation worse.\n\nIran's government is worry about US policy and its goals, so someone like "Ahmadi Nejad" succeeded in last presidency election.
359730
iran will use it for peacefull golls .\nbelieve me
462557
watch the word IRAN start appearing more in print and tv as the elections start back up very soon\n\nIRAN HATES THE UNITED STATES.... Just in case u have not been paying attentiion
588047
Iran will play again ,give some advantages to other countries ,and actually go on it`s dangerous plans !
566308
Its a shame u call urself Iranian,i dont think u r.\nI did read ur other Q and answers, even if u r Iranian i think u stand alone with ur stupid ideas,any good Iranian or muslim would support his country against outside threats in times like these,but u r doing the opposit,dont think that talking like this would help u or ur country .\nI think its better for u to keep asking about women vagina & orgasm and stop talking politics
36458
I support the invasion of Iran either way. There leader is a prejudice bigot. Nations need leadership not hatred and stupidity. The man wants to see how serious we are than so be it. BOMB him back into the stone age where he belongs! Do not listen to these anti war liberal wak-jobs it will not be like Vietnam or even Iraq. We will not need to topple the government just destroy his capability to make wmds. The U.S. is very good at tactical air strikes. Still if I lived anywhere near a Iranian weapons factory I would get the hell out of there now!!! It is not the people, just their pig headed leader that wants to play chicken with the most powerful nation to ever grace Gods world. Good luck mad man...
645980
What makes you think that the US is going to invade Iran?\n\nDid you think about this at all?