Whom are you? Whom am I ? Whom/What are you stand for?
342959
To quote Frank Zappa: "you are what you is".\nOr Firesign Theater: "Who am us, anyway?"\nAre you looking for your own personal identity?\nDo you find yourself living in a sea of indecision?\nPerhaps you ask these questions because life is confusing and you seek solace in something concrete.\nStart with your spiritual side and look within.\nNext, question your values.\nFinally, connect with your neighbors and help those around you.\nPerhaps there, in the acts of loving-kindness, will you find the answers you seek.
1084929
I would say: "Who are you, to judge ME?" :))
233757
I am somebody to some people \nto some people I am nobody\nto others, I am important\nto others I serve no importance\nto some I am annoying \nto others I am great\nI can carry on but I don't have time. \nI am ME who are you?
351128
hello?\nok me..\nid or smth?
490674
Some people are, why, are you?
437630
Subject pronouns are people who do something: \nI you we they he she it who\n\nObject pronouns are people to whom something is done: \nme you us them him her it whom\n\nSo ask yourself, is the person _doing_ or being _done to_?
356330
Who are you? I am concerned about this question.
402327
As I live and breath, I surprise you asked. When you say essential to whom or for what is it essential?
658909
who are you talking to?\nto whom are you talking?\n\nyou're thinking of whom?\nwho are you thinking of?\n\nthis belongs to whom?\nwho owns this?\n\n-Who wants to play secret Santa?\n-We do, let's see who gets whom.\n\nWho are you having dinner with?\nYou're having dinner with whom?\n\nTo determine whether who or whom should be used in a sentence, at least according to traditional usage, many people may find it easier to recast the sentence in non-interrogative form using a personal pronoun and determine whether they would use he or she (subjects) or him or her (direct and indirect objects) instead of who or whom. For example in determining:\n\nWho did you call? versus Whom did you call? \nthis yields:\n\nincorrect -- *You called she. \ncorrect -- You called her. \nSince the former sentence is a solecism, this sentence calls for whom rather than who.\n\nHowever, in determining:\n\nWho shall I say is calling? versus Whom shall I say is calling? \nthis yields:\n\ncorrect -- I shall say she is calling. \nincorrect -- *I shall say her is calling. \nindicating that who is appropriate for this question. (The incorrect form *Whom shall I say is calling? would be an example of hypercorrection resulting from a confused attempt to follow prescriptive grammar.)\n\nBasically, whom is used whenever there is no verb to be in an inflected form referring to it. Thus:\n\nHe was the man whom we later learnt to be a constable. \nHe was the man who we later learnt was a constable. \nHe was the man whom we thought a constable. \nWho will come? \nAlso, whom is the form used whenever there are prepositions involved. Again this is analogous to personal pronouns, for which the object form is also used after a preposition. For example:\n\nTo whom have you been talking? (Compare: You have been talking to him.) \nFor whom have you taken these marvellous photographs? \nWith whom are you going to the cinema? \nWe have been discussing plans with them, of whom we have grown rather fond these days. \nWe have been discussing plans with them, whom we have grown rather fond of these days. \nThe indirect object is normally formed with to, so is generally just a particular example of the usage with prepositions (to whom). In some situations, whom can also be used by itself to represent the indirect object. However this is only really used in contexts where the direct object is omitted, e.g. Whom will you tell? Where the direct object is expressed, to is generally included, even where an analogous sentence using a personal pronoun might use the pronoun as the indirect object, e.g. You will tell him a story but To whom will you tell a story?\n\nThe same rules apply to declined pronouns whomever and whomsoever.\n\nRetrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_%28pronoun%29"
89989
i am \nyou are\nwe are\nthey are\nhe is\nyou (plural) are
241121
who and that can be used together, for example when someone calls you on the phone and you don't know who is calling you can answer the phone and say 'who that?'
246795
who in english can be use in singular and plural, but in spanish you have:\nquien = who in singular\nquienes = who in plural\n\nI hope i was helpful!
585656
Literally: To whom it matters\nIn more common English: Who cares? (I assume you're referring to the Thalia song?)\n\nI suppose it could also be "To whom it may concern", but I have not seen it used this way.
641748
Who is we? And who told you that?
807419
"Who" is used when the person you are asking about is the subject of the sentence.\n\n     Who ate the last piece of pie?\n\n"Whom" is used when the person you are asking about is the object of the sentence.\n\n     Whom were you calling?\n\nA good way to remember is to think of what the answer of the question would be.\n\nHe ate the last piece of pie.    "He" is the subject of the sentence.\n\nI was calling him.   "Him" is the object of the sentence.\n\nBoth "him" and "whom" end with the letter "m" so that's how I remember.  \n\nOf course, the answer to the question doesn't always have to be "him" but it just helps me remember whether to use "who" or "whom" when asking the question.  :-)
177781
What do you mean?????
185460
"Where are you at?" is a question.\nAlso, why would you say "where are you at?" when you could just say "where are you?"?