Why was it ok for Farenheit 9-11 to come out so soon after 9-11, but now "Flight 93" is TOO SOON?
351470
I don't like Michael Moore movie and it was a stupid movie\nBut "Flight 93" I feel so sad about all those people that die I don't know if I could take all that hurt and knowing it real people that die because of some stupid people that got in their head they should show the american,the movie may cause many American to turn on some of the arabs here...\nThis isn't a make believe movie like all of hollywood have made it like seening your FAMILY and close FRIENDS dying in mid-air I hope people do go out and support the movie I know I will
262471
There is no doubt that much more happen that day, which government is not telling us. If we recall that it was the time when the polls for president Bush were going down. But right after the attack the rating went up! so something did happen. Now the file is closed we will never get the true answer. Anybody who will raise the question will be labeled terrorist and unpatriotic.
611280
They were warned about it in advance since the Jews were responsible for 9/11.
432462
Hahaha...I asked a very similar question a week ago. It's a really good question that liberals cannot answer. The funniest thing was that a couple of people told me to watch Fahrenheit 9/11 or Loose change...great sources(or so liberals think!)
447447
They are nutters 9/11 did happen. Im just uncertain about some of the fact surrounding the Pentagon (no one seen a plane, no one heard one, no debris, was it a bomb or just a poor excuse for the  the U.S. Government to not shoot the planes down that crashed into the towers? After all they did know the planes where hijacked shortly after take off, and U.S. security is the best in the world... so what happened? Confused consiracy but every thing was so well orcastrated! Thats my opinion. Love Heidi
1016023
Yes, but not very soon.  I'm sure that careful planning is being taken by Al Qaida and its allies worldwide nowadays, to ensure that they will inflict  hundred times they had done during 9/11. Security of the Americans are of prime inportance.  The CIA, FBI, NSA and the Homeland Security in coordination with its allies should ensure that such thing will never happen in american soil, otherwise, hundreds of thousands of innocent people will suffer the consequences of thier neglidience.
382665
for the same reason the security videos of the pentagon "plane" aren't being released..for the same reason FEMA and engineers can't explain how bldg 7 came down...for the same reason the 911 report is a movie script instead of an investigation....we all have been victims of a neo-conservative con game that has put us at war and given them their dream - power, oil, money, glory and the chance to mmanifest their white-centric, pax-americana vision for the world.
527858
Definately September 11, 2001.
1163400
considering that one of the first things i saw on the page said, "Proof Blue Screen Technology Faked 2nd Plane "  i know its crap.\ni'm tired of writing about the 911 conspiracy stuff and these conspiracy ideas floating around right now are just getting more and more outrageous.  are there some questions that need to be answered about 911? yes probably are a few....but these questions have NOTHING to do with: now blue screened planes, planes swapped secretly for missiles and drones, faked plane crashes, secret voice sampled passengers to fake phone calls home, secret landing fields, breakaway light poles, hundreds to thousands of planted "witnesses" and fake work crews planting explosives.\nthis stuff is either some strange disinformation campaign, or someone trying to make a buck off people who don't trust the government and can't think.
1033154
Fahrenheit 9/11 is a oscar nominated documentary from Michael Moore and represents his view on what happened to the United States after September 11; and how the Bush Administration allegedly used the tragic event to push forward its agenda for unjust wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.\nIt is very polemic if you like Bush administration you will not like it and the other way round.\nDo not confuse with "Fahrenheit 451", a François Truffaut movie from 1966, based on the book of the same name from Ray Bradbury.
707951
Well, I don't know when or if there will be another attack upon the US, but I can pretty much guarantee it won't be using airplanes again.  They're more creative than that, and we're pretty stupid for only really securing THAT type of public transportation.
195509
I think we are wary of muslams, it is a normal reaction to and action the way I see it. If 9/11 never happened it might be a differant story. But it did. I think to err on the side of caution is probably the right thing to do. Even though it probably doesn't matter who runs the ports.
439497
It really happened. On September 11, 2001. It is about the plane the terrorists were trying to steer into the White House, but the passengers overpowered them, and it flew into the ground in Pennyslvania instead. \n\nBecause many of the passengers were able to use their cell phones to make calls to both family and to authorities, plus what they could get from the conversations from the tapes in the cockpit, they were able to piece together a fairly close depiction of actual events. \n\nIt is supposed to be really good, leaving nothing to the imagination. I will not be seeing it, becuase as a Flight Attendant for United Airlines at that time and suffering from post-traumatic syndrome since then, I don't need any set backs. I am only now starting to peek out of my shell.
1127335
Some of what is presented in "loose change" can be disputed to the point of possibly being coincidental or hear say.\n\nBut there are also things that are pointed out in the film that cannot be disputed, as it would violate the laws of physics for them to have occurred in the way that our government has led us to believe.\n\nI have been doing research on both sides of this issue and there are several items that violate physics.\n\n1. No mater how structurally compromised the struck floors were, the towers could not have fallen at free fall speed. This can only occur when there is no support anywhere under the falling structure.\n\n2. You cannot take out multiple light poles on the way into the pentagon with out leaving massive amounts of debris in the path from the poles knocking chunks out of the plane much less the flaming fuel spill it would have produced. The Boeing fuel tests proved that a plane hitting even a single light pole would rip the wing off creating a huge fireball immediately. There was no debris or scorch marks anywhere other than the scorch marks at the building itself.\n\nThe laws of physics do not conveniently change for anyone no matter how much rhetoric that people spew. We will probably never know the truth about who was responsible, but we do know that the story our government has fed us doesn't hold water.
352459
It might be withholding some information on the grounds of national security of for legal reasons but in the main the events of that day are so well documented that it would be difficult to withold any of the salient facts.\n\nThere are conspiracy theories that 9/11 was orchestrated by the FBI and other US agencies but as with all conspiracy theories, they don't stand up to even the most basic of examinations and are based on ignorance not fact.
240159
We werent safe during the Clinton Administration when Al Queda was PLANNING 911....nor were we safe during the NUMEROUS attacks that have been defeated since.\n\nAs long as we have the money and power, we will always maintain some risk, but Al Queda is driven by a culture that NEVER EVER EVER EVER forgives...so Im convinced that now, on some level, right or wrong, we will ALWAYS have to contend with the idiocy of radical Islamists on SOME level.  I just hope people take 9-11 seriously enough to help the government do it's job with the newer security measures and even, kooky as it may sound, by reporting suspicious activities.\n\nThe people at the flight schools where Mohammed Atta trained suspected something strange, but didn't speak up.  Maybe now we can all be a little more aware of strange circumstances, if they occur in our lives.
1166933
This video is very compelling evidence that there's a lot more to the events of 9/11 than most people know.  A few of the things in the Loose Change video are inaccurate, but it compiles enough accurate information to lead to further questions.  \n\nTo the people who say things like "this has all been disproven" or "it's just conspiracy theories" you are fooling yourselves.  The famous philospher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) said “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident”.  People will believe any lie either because they want it to be true, or because they fear it is true.  The lie you are believing is that the official story of how the events of 9/11 occurred are true.  When you OBJECTIVELY analysis the scientific evidence -- as a detective or scientist would -- without injecting false patriatism into the equation -- you realize that it is simply physically impossible that things happened as we've been led to believe.\nAnd  as a side note, questioning the events of 9/11 is NOT unpatriotic.  On the contrary, it's about the most patriotic thing you can do.  We have a duty to defend this great nation of ours against ALL threats, foriegn AND DOMESTIC.  And the families of the victims of 9/11 have a right to know the TRUTH of how and why their loved ones died.  In that spirit, I present the following very small bits of information concerning the events of 9/11.\n\nYou can’t collapse a skyscraper with jet fuel.\nMany engineers have come forward and said that there’s no way those buildings fell from fire.  Steel doesn’t weaken until almost 2000 degrees F, and it doesn’t melt until almost 3000 degrees F.  Jet fuel doesn’t burn hot enough to do it.\nThe official NIST report states “The initial jet fuel fires themselves lasted at most a few minutes” and office material fires would burn out within about 20 minutes in a given location. (NIST, 2005; p. 179, emphasis added.)   The final NIST report on the Towers admits:  \n"Of the more than 170 areas examined on 16 perimeter column panels, only three columns had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250ºC… Only two core column specimens had sufficient paint remaining to make such an analysis, and their temperatures did not reach 250 ºC. ... Using metallographic analysis, NIST determined that there was no evidence that any of the samples had reached temperatures above 600 ºC."  (NIST, 2005, pp. 176-177) \nKevin Ryan, the engineer from the company that underwrote the towers, said it was impossible that a jet fuel fire brought the towers down.  The architect who designed the twin towers has repeatedly said that he designed them to take not 1, but 2, massive passenger airliner impacts and not fall.  \nPools of molten steel were found in the basements of the towers (including tower 7) weeks after 9/11.  Steel melts at 2777 degrees F.  Jet fuel burns at only 1577 degrees F.  It is literally impossible for jet fuel fires to get hot enough to melt steel into molten pools.  Something else must have done it.\n\nFirefighters and survivors said repeatedly that bombs were going off throughout the towers, on many different floors. Firefighters gave very specific descriptions of seeing flashes of light and explosions going off on the lower levels.   If you watch the news from that morning, you'll even see Fox news reporting a "4th explosion" going off in tower 1.   For instance, at the start of the collapse of the South Tower a Fox  News anchor reported:   “There is an explosion at the base of the building… white smoke from the bottom… something happened at the base of the building!  Then another explosion.”\nFirefighter Edward Cachia independently reported:  \n“[We] thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came