who moved the stone ? plz explain it briefly.?
342152
The issue you really have to ask about is Why was Jesus buried in a stone enclosed cave to begin with. The answer is that this story is, also, based on Mithra-ism. Mithra, son of a human mother and a god, born in the Winter, died in the Spring, who died for the sins of the people, but who came back to life three days later, was also buried in Rock, and, when resurrected, rose out of the rock.\n\nJews would not bury any dead in rock. This would have prevented 'From dust to dust,' and is forbidden. The only reason for Jesus to have been buried in this way is to reflect the story of Mithra, like so much of the rest of his story.
671994
Hon, did you try doing a search or googling "Charles the Hammer?"  Sometimes getting info on something is that simple. :)\n\nI found a few links to sites for you to check, but you ought to do some of the work yourself, so get ready to do some reading to find which info it is that you're wanting.  ;)
84994
I didnt read this story for years, but i know i learned it in school. I might be able to look through my notes later and give you a more detailed response. Here is what i remember:\n\nI just a correction with what General wrote. The women went to a store right away to get a replacement. She did not have enough money, so she made a deal to pay it back slowly. She was indebted for many, many years. The rich lady got back the necklace right away. Years later the poor women met her, and was full of resentment. She told the lady, do you know what you did to me? The lady had no idea. When she told her all about what she did the lady couldnt believe it, she told her it was a fake.\n\nThe story has irony, the poor lady could now get the necklace back, and cash it in and be rich.\nPoint of view is also important to the story because we get to see the anguish the poor lady had. If it would be through the rich lady's eyes we would know all along that it was a fake. In this case it was a surprise.
204621
I think with the Scottish backgrounds of the game of curling, and the power of the hammer, it might have just been named it because of its power. As you know, hammer means last rock and that is pretty powerful. I don't know..just my guess!!
384648
why did owens team dig in that hole?\nso that owen could go to the batheroom\n\nhow did he know about the diamonds and the nazi papers?\nhe could find out from various source.  for example the jewish guy tha worked with him, the stone could have been stolen from his family.  Or he could have an insider in the back.  Use your IMAGINATION.\n\nand last but not least why is ms foster even in the movie?\nto get the papers. Did you actually watch the movie???
818074
Moses a told to do many thing with his staff. To me the most important was to strike the stone in order to get water from the stone for the people. Trouble is next time he was commanded to speak to the stone but he struck it anyway. It was to be a picture of Christ. First he was struck, then if we asked he would give us living water.. Moses messed it up... Oh well in God's grace He gave the people water anyway... He is such a GOOD GOD!!!   Jim
393016
Luk 20:18 - Whosoever shall fall on that stone, shall be broken,.... Not who shall fall upon Christ by faith, and build upon him as the foundation stone, for such shall be saved; but that stumble at him, and are offended with him, and fall by unbelief and hardness of heart; such do themselves much hurt and mischief and expose themselves to danger and ruin; they bid very fair for destruction: \n\nbut on whomsoever it shall fall; as it did with its full weight upon the Jews at their destruction, and as it will upon all Christless sinners at the last day: \n\nit will grind him to powder; the ruin of such will be unavoidable, and there will be no recovery; See Gill on Mat_21:44.
121115
it was dug out of the ground\n\nsee - the next two answers just confirm what i said, in a very wordy way
381810
It's in the book of Daniel. The words were written on a wall by a hand that appeared. Daniel was brought in to interpret the words. It is something about your time being up. The king that saw the words written died that night. I don't recall any more off the top of my head. Daniel is a really interesting book. I would highly recommend reading it.
35453
The first is a chronological, literal way to say that this was the way that it was done.  It was written the exact way that it happened.  The one in Chapter 2 is a topical, storytelling way to put it.  The author doesn't make them contradicting at all.  When he says "Now the Lord had formed out of the ground all the beasts..." it doesn't indicate that this was after man.  It actually says that this had already been done in the past.  So I don't think the same way as the previous answerer does.  I read them as saying the same thing, but just how you would answer a question differently in a lab report from english class, they are just stylistically different.  If you have more questions about creation, www.answersingenesis.org is a great resource.  I've already been praying for you!
1013892
It is a sign that someone has visited the grave. They put a pebble there to show that they were there. It's just a custom.
1176966
The pyramids. Some of those stones must of weighed in excessive of 100 tonnes, all moves into place by man. They developed some very intriguing devices to help get them in place.
332198
Thank you for the article- it had some interesting insights!\n\nI have long thought that there was something odd in the part of Genesis 2:1 and the phrasing Genesis 1 used. I've been looking for things that explained it and your article did just that.\n\nIt simply makes no sense that the God who sent His people to the wilderness for 40 years would have (or needed to) rush the planet in 6 days, then fake various items to make it seem much older. He does not work that way at any other time, so why then?\n\nI have said for years that when the Bible and science or reality conflict, our understanding of one or the other is flawed- and I think we've really messed up our understanding of the Bible!
56773
3 on one side, 3 on the other.\n\nIF they all balance, then the 2 left over has the lighter stone, just weigh and find out the lighter stone.\n\nIF they do NOT balance, then take the 3 that's lighter, take TWO stones from that group and weigh.\n\nIF they are balanced, the remaining stone from the 3 is the lighter stone.\n\nIf there's one that's lighter, then that's the stone you want.\n\nOnly two weighings in either case!
76444
If Divinity wanted us to dwell upon the written word, he might have put it down on tablets of stone again.\nChrist could read.  Many of his followers could write.  Why did he not dictate exactly what we needed to know so that there would be no confusion?\nAs for laws, see below:
411879
A.K.A the Sorcercer's stone. it excist but I can't determine it's location at this time. It turns metals to gold and makes the drinker immortal. I'll be the future owner so hands off!!
127943
I never knew about this but heres a quote from a website.  This is pretty cool stuff!  Also, he reported that he was "silenced" by thugs  who beat him up and never spoke of his discoveries again after that, sad world.\nQuote:\n\n"Scientists cannot explain how Leedskalnin built coral castle. It was featured on IN Search of with Leonard Nimoy. He moved coral stones weighing as much as 28 tons with equipment designed to only lift 10 tons, and only lift it, not move it. People spying on him with binoculars signed sworn affidavits that they saw coral stones weighing tons, floating in the air like helium balloons.\n\nMy best guess is: He put a strong negative electric charge on them, (at night to avoid the photo electric effect) and the Earth's magnetic field pushed up on them and they floated.\n\nAccording to him, a strong negative charge is really filling it with south magnetic pole units and the whole stone becomes a south magnetic monopole.\n\nI experimented and made a cement brick weighing 15 pounds, to weigh 13 pounds. Did it twice and never tried it again."\n\nIn response to the answer below..  I wasn't trying to declare this as fact I was quoting someone else.  And My enthusiasm was for the trivia not for a new scientific discovery.  Obviously, if it were true then it would be replicated as all science works.  Go easy on me :)  Interesting to note that the user below has been suspended