do women like a penis circumcised or with that skin on it?
349222
Speaking as the EX wife of an uncircumcised man......circumcised please.  Not only is it more sanitary but it's so much more appealing to the eye.
552034
Well get ready for this.... i have a boyfriend that ive been with for about 2 years. He is not circumcised. One of the first times we had sex his fore skin broke and there was blood everywhere... i thought it was me at first, as if that would'nt have been bad enough! We always use plenty of lube now and usually we have to use a condom because of it, so as you can see i love him because im still with him but i would have prefered him to be circumcised.
992753
Not other than it's easier to keep it clean and then the father doesn't have to have the "how to clean your self" talk, with their son.\n\nIt looks nice, a lot of girls/women don't like foreskin. \nIt's painful, but it's not like he'll remember it. \n\nA Mohel, is a person that performs the circumision, in the jewish faith. On t.v. this lady hired one, even though she wasn't jewish and she said the baby hardly cried at all. It was that reality show  Dr. 90210.
1008687
A circumcised penis is when their foreskin gets removed from their penis.  I really don't know what Muslims have so i wont be able to answer that one.  Sorry! \n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcised\n\nHave a look at that link.
1180585
Is there some medical reasoning behind this? As for your part it shouldn't make much difference to you, however his situation will change. The foreskin covers the head of the penis to protect it and to stimulate it. In circumcised males the skin of the head of the penis become thicker to protect itself and of course the stimulation is gone becuase under the foreskin are tiny ridges that help to stimulate. I have no idea why it is a popular belief that it is "better" to be circumcised. He will find that his sexual actions with you will not be as gentle as he will need to be more "violent" to stimulate his now less sensitive penis. God made him that way for a reason but good luck whatever you choose.
667348
Barring the comments concerning ("You should have done it 35 years ago-your parents had that option") I would say that it is still a good idea. I dated someone for years that was uncircumcised. When pulling the skin back- he was almost too sensitive and he could not last very long. I don't know if the duration was due to that or not. I would assume that it would be painful after the anesthetic wore off-but-in the long run it may be practical. I can understand that the feelings would be better without the hood. It just makes sense. AND it is stupid that people think that it is unhygienic to have the extra skin. People have been circumcised by religious custom-just because it is a tradition.
621799
Since most people in the world except in curtain countries have uncircumsezed penis's, I am suprised that your not asking about it being the other way round.\n\nThey generally have no problems with either
576387
It's not strange. That's acutally normal. My man is not circumsized. It's all good. If you are ok with it your lover will be. Just keep it clean.
676895
Yes, the reason for that is a lot of Bacteria get accumulated in an infected men's foreskin and when he enters the skin stretches and gets rubbed against the inner walls of vagina. This increase the chances substantially when compared to a circumcised organ.
306216
Dear Itsin ....\n\nYou are fortunate to have an uncircumcised penis.\n\nThis extra skin is called the "foreskin".\n\nNature put the foreskin there to protect the sensitive head.  This protection keeps the head sensitive so that sex is very pleasurable.  \n\nThe foreskin also prevents anything from touching the head and arousing you unintentionally.\n\nIt is a brilliant piece of engineering by nature.\n\nIt is important to clean underneath the foreskin, just like it's important to wash your body in other places.\n\nI recommend that the foreskin be kept, unless there is a clear health risk.\n\nYou are fine like you are.
656933
Although most circumcised men would never openly admit to it, they are jealous of men who have foreskins. \n\nThey know that their foreskins were removed without their consent when they were (usually) babies and so they try and make EVERYONE suffer the same abuse as they encountered.\n\nBe proud to be normal and intact - the way that nature intended. \n\nThese days there are NO hygenic reasons for circumcision if you bathe at least once a day. There will therefore be no smell. Accusations otherwise are just born out of ignorance. If you consider most of European men, for instance, are uncircumcised, don't you think they would have moved to circumcision en masse long ago if circumcision was the most hygenic and correct thing to do?\n\nAlmost all other reasons for circumcision are now medically treatable and therefore, circumcision is unneccessary.\n\nFor women, an intact penis is DESIGNED to work better that a circumcised one because the foreskin allows for greater movement during sexual intercourse and less lubrication is required.\n\nIt is also better for the man because his glans is soft and sensitive - the glans on circumcised penises gets thick and hard over the years and decreases sensitivity and can even lead to erection problems.\n\nI am writing this as someone who IS circumcised and I am appalled that a fully functional part of me was trimmed off for no real reason and which has, subsequently, given me a less satisfactory sex life than my uncut counterparts.
370870
NO, sorry!\nForeskin advantage.\n20 good reasons against the circumcision!\n\n1. Full penis length and circumference. The "prepuce" (foreskin) constitutes 50% or more of the skin system of the penis. If unfolded and spread flat, the average adult foreskin measures 60-90 square centimeters (10-14 square inches), or about the size of an index card. The foreskin creates a visible longer penis, especially when the foreskin extends beyond the head of the penis. Also, the double-layered tissue of the foreskin engorges with blood during erection and creates a visibly and sensually thicker shaft and glans.When the engorged foreskin retracts behind the coronal ridge of the glans, it often creates a wider and more pronounced "ridge" that many partners find especially stimulating during penetrative intercourse. The circumcised penis appears truncated and thinner than a full-sized intact penis.\n\n2. Protection. The sleeve of tissue known as the foreskin normally covers the glans and protects it from abrasion, drying, callusing (keratinization), and environmental contaminants. The glans is intended by nature to be a protected internal organ, like the female clitoris. The effect of an exposed glans and resulting keratinization on human sexual response has never been studied. Increasing reports by circumcised men indicate that keratinization causes a loss of sexual sensation, pleasure and fulfillment.\n\n3. Ridged bands. The inner foreskin contains bands of densely innervated, sexually responsive tissue. They constitute a primary erogenous zone of the human penis and are important for realizing the fullness and intensity of sexual response.\n\n4. Gliding action. The foreskin is the only moving part of the penis. During any sexual activity, the foreskin and glans work in unison; their mutual interaction creates a complete sexual response. In heterosexual intercourse, the non-abrasive gliding of the penis in and out of itself within the vagina facilitates smooth and pleasurable intercourse for both partners. Without this gliding action, the corona of the circumcised penis can function as a one-way valve, dragging vaginal lubricants out into the drying air and making artificial lubricants essential for non-painful intercourse.\n\n5. Specialized sensory tissue. In addition to the "ridged bands" mentioned above, thousands of coiled fine-touch receptors (Meissner’s corpuscles) constitute the most important sensory component of the penis. The foreskin contains branches of the dorsal nerve and between 10,000 and 20,000 specialized erotogenic nerve endings of several types, which are capable of sensing slight motion and stretch, subtle changes in temperature, and fine gradations in texture.\n\n6. The frenulum. This is a highly nerve-laden web of tissue that tethers the inner foreskin to the underside of the glans. It is similar to the frenula found under the tongue, the upper lip and the clitoral hood (female foreskin). For many intact men, the penile frenulum is a male "G-spot" that is highly pleasurable when repeatedly stretched and relaxed during sexual activity. Depending on the surgical method used, the frenulum is partially to completely destroyed by circumcision.\n\n7. Proper blood flow. The foreskin contains several feet of blood vessels, including the frenular artery and branches of the dorsal artery. The loss of this rich vascularization interrupts normal blood flow to the shaft and glans of the penis, damaging the natural function of the penis and altering its development.\n\n8. Immunological defense. The soft mucosa of the inner foreskin produces plasma cells, which secrete immunoglobulin antibodies, and antibacterial and antiviral proteins, such as the pathogen-killing enzyme called lysozyme. All of the human mucosa (the linings of the mouth, eyelids, vagina, foreskin and an.us) are the body's first line of defense against disease. This benefit of the foreskin could be one possible explanati
587787
circumcised penises are just like crew cut military guys\nclean and handsome!
1097892
I've been with both and the circumcised guy will last longer because there is less sensitivity at the head of the penis. This happens, of course, over time if a guy was clipped at birth. I've never known of anyone who had it done as an adult. What are his reasons for wanting unnecessary surgery? Has he looked into the complications? Infection, AMPUTATION! Is it just so he'll match his buddies? It really will affect your sex life, so he should seriously discuss the repercussions with a doctor and also consider your feelings about it. Good luck.
647742
Generally no.  What is sometimes euphemistically called female "circumcision" is more correctly female genital mutilation.  Parts of the female genital anatomy are removed that cannot be replaced. There are some aspects of the damage done that can be improved surgically. It depends on the extent of the surgery and any complications that the patient has incurred.
230193
Yes, I'm sure, girls do prefer it & enjoy more than with \nun-cicumcised one, becuse the feel with participating inside muscle is always more, sensitive & exciting than its with the covered one. \nAnd for clean oralsex, I think, its the only choice.
1171456
As for AAP0305, that is a fable. In America it is normal that men are circumcised, but here in Europe it's not usual. \nThat doesn't mean that all men here have infections or give the women infections. \nIt's all a matter of personal hygiene, circumcised or not. \n\nI love it when a man is not circumcised. I like it much better when the skin is on. I love to play with it :-) and a circumcised man just is missing something, according to my opinion.\nNo problem, but if you ask me what I like the most, it's definately uncircumcised.\nIf you ask my boyfriend, he will say the same. The thought that that delicate part of him would be missing... he just doesn't want to think about that. He loves his foreskin, it makes everything more sensible and nice.