why is H.R. 4437 injustice?
344853
don't know that it is, or that it isn't.  read the text of the legislation and come back to us with an answer. I'm posting the web address with the complete text in it.\n\nEnjoy.
17434
Congressmen do a lot of casework; this might be somewhere to bring in someone with a little more power than you probably have yourself.\n\nMedia also can work wonders.  If you can prove that this is in fact going on, there's a good chance that bad media coverage will either get them to change their ways from embarrassment, or get ousted thanks to public outrage.\n\nFinally, you could appeal any decisions made under such circumstances to a higher court.
621560
The Third Provision Of HR4437 States:\n\nAnyone or any organization who “assists” an individual without documentation “to reside in or remain” in the United States knowingly or with “reckless disregard” as to the individual’s legal status would be liable for criminal penalties and five years in prison.   This could include church personnel who provide shelter or other basic needs assistance to an undocumented individual.   Property used in this act would be subject to seizure and forfeiture.\n\n5 Years In Prison Is A Big Deterrent\nNo Employer In His Right Mind Will Hire Illegal Aliens\n\nAnd This Provision Also Addresses\nTAKE AWAY ALL BENEFITS FROM ILLEGALS \n\nOnce This Reform Bill Is Passed, Within a month there WILL be ten million (more or less) people lined up at the Mexican border trying to get out of the United States And Back To Whatever Country They Came From.\n\nNo Work = No Stay\nWe Wont Have To Deport Anyone,\nNo Deportation Costs \nTheyll Go Home Themselves\n\nNo Work = No Come Back\nWe Wont Have To Build A Fortress Wall On Our Southern Border
761011
The reason is because the GOP platform is for corporations and big businesses.....These are their supporters and fund there elections!  If we raised the minimum wage, it would ultimately hurt these businesses bottom line....So instead, the GOP blames illegals for lowering Americans wages, its a very clever trick.....However, illegals don't make the rules nor do they sponsor laws!  Congress didn't raise the minimum wage, yet they did vote to raise their own pay!  Its hypocrisy!  And these politicians are out of touch with the American people...
604913
Give evidences to show the injustices caused. Such as the effects of the Jim Crow laws, segregation, interracial relations, and unfair legal judgements.
220250
Yes. I think that it is an injustice to our society. The people that should be paid that much is our police officers, firemen & soldiers that fight for our country.
621592
It isn't illegal. The Constitution specifically says the people have the right to assemble and to petition their government for grievances. There is more to it than just the right to sell machine guns to toddlers, you know?\n\nBesides, it is up to the individual Congressman to decide if he is going to listen or not. Remember all the ruckus about the Lobbyists? After a lot of hand-wringing, the Congress has decided they are just going to quietly give the Lobbyists even more access to power. Just because people are angry doesn't mean that anyone in Congress cares about their feelings or their grievances.
599108
How about:\nUSA PATRIOT Act, that was certainly controversial.\nH. R. 3162\n\nhttp://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.3162.ENR:\n\nFor research tips:\n\nTHE BEST WAY to research legislative history is to go the Library of Congress. They keep the record of ALL hearings on the bill(both committee and floor) and any statements made by congressmen and any other people that Congress has questioned regarding the bill etc etc etc.\n\nThe website given by previous answerer will help:\nIt is the website of the library of congress:\n\nhttp://thomas.loc.gov\n\nI would also suggest reading this site(it is very helpful):\nhttp://www.llsdc.org/sourcebook/fed-leg-hist.htm\n\nSome trivia:\nSupreme Court Justice Scalia hates legislative history, and considers it not useful.\nHe once was quoted to say something to the tone of:\n"I had to exile my clerk to the dungeon to dig through useless pile of legislative junk"\nSo you are not alone in being frustrated with legislative history.\n\nP.S. I hope you are paid for this thankless task.
309104
Heres A Summary Of HR 4437\n\nhttp://www.justiceforimmigrants.org/HR4437.html
980014
To law abiding citizens it seems to appear no threat on the surface. Why would it bother or affect me? The underlying fact remains that it could happen to you. It could affect you. A neighbour or co-worker you angered in some way, phones a pal in the government, abuses happen, remember the real "red menace " of the McCarthy years. Because this Act gives anyone the ability to suspend the one right America had defended since birth is indefensible due to it's very almost uni-lateral design. Even if you are truly innocent, this Act means that you could not present that evidence and you have no recourse? Don't sound American to me.
356132
The case was thrown out because illegals aren't in the system. You can't possibly get accurate stats about it, only rough estimates can be figured out with illegal status data.
278751
I have an article by Wikipedia that could be an assistance for you to understanding HR 4437.
67155
Because of the fundamental issue with all Americans today......Accountabilty!\n\nNo one is held responsible for their own actions and the liberal judges and law makers in place are not issuing the punishments neccessary to deter future crimes.  There are all kinds of excuses, but no ownership.
709663
I can't justify it..\nDon't think they can truly justify it either...\n\nand they will put up smoke and mirrors just like congress does..\n\ntime these people go to prison...
891615
It's being challenged on its housing restrictions. Most of the bill to length sentences for child molesters has already been signed into law. The authors have already backtracked and admitted that they made a mistake when they didn't write the initiative clearly enough not to apply retroactively. While that may fly in some states like New York, New Jersey, Iowa and Georgia, in California, it does not. We may not be a fully blue state but we're far from a red state. We take our constitutional rights seriously, and there are many pissed off people fighting this initiative in court. \n\nThe California Department of Corrections is also not real happy about the parolees not being able to live within 2000 feet of schools and parks. It is saying it might have to build housing at public expense to house them - something like $132 million to start. This in a state which already has a multi billion budget (the governor didn't solve the budget problem - he just borrowed the funds by floating bonds.)\n\nAlthough 70 oercent of voters cast yes votes on it, the courts frown on initiatives that are popular but unconstitutional. Another example was an initiative which banned all public services to illegal aliens in 1994. The public voted for it; the courts threw it out. \n\nI agree with the 2nd poster - it is time for the legislators to stop trying to legislate these kinds of laws. They only look like idiots, especially when they can't even write the initiatives right.\n\nAlso below is a link to a Los Angeles Times editorial against Proposition 83. \n\nhttp://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-jessica12nov12,0,4249584.story?coll=la-opinion-leftrail
228708
Of course it isn't fair!  So much of our legal system is biased in favor of the perceived 'victim' that it all-too-often MAKES a victim.  Soooo many groups whine & complain about being oppressed & disadvantaged- when they're actually the ones with the advantage.  That's the problem with special rules for some- there will always be those willing to abuse them.
548699
I think the rebellion will be at the ballot box if Congress goes against the majority will.  Blood is hot on this one, but thoughts of revenge by illegal immigration opponents are aimed at the government, in my opinion.