Is 9/11 a government conspiracy?
347447
Yes, the buildings were insured for an unheard off amount a month before the event and there were numerous other things that point towards this type of theory bin laden and the bush family have had business deals in the past as well as the other players within the New World Order and other secret societies, The rest of the world are just pawns in a game of a chosen few. If a leader of a country denies what is expected of them, they are ejected in one form or another.\nI try not to read too much into it because there is nothing I can do nor anyone else\n\nI also have to add that clinton is in on it as well, from the same group.\n\nDo you really think that it was a matter of fate that the buildings fell like that of a controlled implosion.\n\nI also found it interesting that chaney was hidden away while bush was talking through a blow horn at ground zero
1038770
The bush administration is responsible for the whole 9-11 attack. Watch 9-11: Loose Change (2nd Edition).
1120454
as much as i hate to admit it...i believe its very possible. i mean the evidence even makes 9/11 look like a conspiracy. and i hate to believe it and im not 100% sure were i stand with that but lets just say pieces eerily fall into place
102672
Unless you are engaging in activity that could be construed as aiding and abetting terrorism, I think you are being overly paranoid.\n\nThe government is engaging in those activities, but it has more to do with data mining. The government has a program called Tempest that is capable of monitoring electronics within the nation, but it does not do so arbitarily. Tempest runs in the background. When certain key phrases come up (for instance, "I want to kill the President"), Tempest roars to life and signals agents that someone to watch out for has been identified.\n\nThe government does not just arbitrarily say, "I think I'm gonna listen in on Sam's conversation tonight and see what pops up." That is like finding a needle in a haystack.
814033
You hit it right on the head with those kooks who believe that the government was behind 9/11. If they were so smart to do 9/11, which would have involved over 2000 people, plus the 3000 who died that day, to be complicit and part of the entire conspiracy. Taht is everyone in the NY Pd. The FDNY, the Port Authority, the employees of United and American (all 3000 of them), the fire fighters and police at the Pentagon, the CIA and FBI...which would mean it would have taken a considerable amoutn of difficult EFFORT to pull off,\n\nyet our government can't "plant" one nuclear device in a country as big as Iraq.
1183599
Of course there's a conspiracy!\nProblem is it's never straight forward.  \nWho stood to gain form 9/11?\nThe Bush Admin given a reason to invade Iraq & take all that un-tapped oil.  Since then we've discovered that Bush's own brother held the Insurance policy for the Twin Towers.\nThe Israelis seen celebrating as the Buildings fell.  & The fight against Terrorism began in earnest.\n\nWho stood to lose?  \nThe rest of the World that's not allowed to criticise America & that Mr Bush Jr is a loose cannon, with a whole nation of Patriotic numb-skulls!\nWe wonder what he'll do next to feather his nest & damn the rest of us to an ensuing Jihad from Mr Bushs Duff foreign policy!
348183
I don't believe the official version of the 9/11.\nIf it was true why the government don't show us the videos of the plane crash at the Pentagon, Why the remains of the WTC were quickly destroyed, how can WTC 7 collapse with a small fire? Why the government and the EPA lied about the air quality surrounding the WTC after the collapse and putting the lives of hundreds if not thousands of men and women who were helping the recoveries in danger (most of them have health illness related to poor air quality these days)? Why the government can't give us the proper answers to these question. \nWhy can't we believe the government ? They lied for the war in Iraq, where's the WMD ? but at least we have remove the dictator.\n\nHere is one evidence of the collapse of the buildings were "pulled intentionally"\nA presentation made by professor Steven E. Jones.\nhttp://www.cerebellum.tv/fvideo/byu.php...\nThe power point slides\nhttp://www.checktheevidence.com/911/byus...\n\nEven in the 1960s the government were willing to create "terrorism" in order to attack cuba\nhttp://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf
610473
sure 911truth and the "loose change" film both say that.  i'd like to see a more thorough and objective investigation of these claims, however. and such an investigation must not be hindered by balking attacks. is it me, or is it that any body who raises some kind of question or proposes there was an alternative explanation to 9-11, is thrown to the wolves for being a tin-hat wearing conspiracy theorist?  why can't we be more like factcheck about this? it is not helpful to be dismissive NOR is it helpful to carelessly throw unfounded paranoid ideas into these discussions. how about we investigate 9-11 using the scientific method? what a concept
1098154
you are right to be curious, there are major cover-ups going on regarding 9/11. i would invite you to view www.911truth.org (i'm not affiliated with them).  also www.scholarsfor911truth.org .\n\nthere are many more but those will get you started :)
290535
A great deal is implied in your question. If I read it as I think you intended it, you mean to illicit some of the various conspiratorial beliefs surrounding the events of that infamous day.\n\nThe official, and still controversial version of events, are recored in the “9/11 Report.” You can get a copy for free here : http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911... if you care to “thumb” through the 580 some odd pages of report.\n\nAs an aside, there were no 737's used in attacks. Two 757's and Two 767's were used to attack economic, military and, it is believed, political targets. I say believed because in addition to the World Trade Center, it is believed that the White House and The Capitol were among the originally intended targets. \n\nWhile you can get a chronological breakdown of what happened that fateful day, most people seem to miss the fact that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda succeeded in proving that radical Islam and the West were at war. This is a fact that few American leaders from either party chose to recognize,  until 3,000 Americans were murdered on 9/11. See references to the prior WTC, the Khobar Towers, Embassy's in Kenya and Tanzania, and the USS Cole bombings, all of which occurred before 2000 and about which nothing was effectively done.\n\nIf you are inclined to entertain conspiratorial ideas about 9/11, fine, but keep this in mind;  contradictions don't exist. If your faced with one, check your premises because one or more of them must be wrong. This is not to say that conspiracy is impossible, but rather, try to reconcile the facts before moving on to conjecture. \n\nWe remain at war to this day.
44944
As an individual and in my personal opinion. Yes it is a conspiracy.\n\nSince the public at large now has a means of sharing information and views it is becoming more and more difficult to con them.
1153699
upsetting that people are so dismissive of so called 'conspiracy theories'. the biggest conspiracy theory is the one that Usama bin laden did it and the US government had nothing to do with it.\n\nMost of the 'conspiracy theorists' are looking for the truth and want justice for the 3000 people killed in the WTC that day, along side the hundreds of thousands of innocent people killed in iraq. The US continues to use 9/11 as a pretext for whatever they like.\n\nTHE FBI HAVE STATED THAT THERE IS NO HARD EVIDENCE CONNECTING USAMA BIN LADEN TO 9/11. That is why on the FBI 'most wanted' website it DOESN'T say 'USAMA BIN LADEN wanted for the wtc attacks of september 11th 2001"\n\nLook at 9/11 like a murder investigation. A crime has been commited. How does a detective draw up a list of suspects? They see who would benefit from the crime and see whether they had the means and motive to carry it out. The PNAC 'Protecting americas defences' document clearly states that an attack on the US, like 9/11, would be beneficial to them. \n\nThen look at the Able danger project. Able Danger was the governement project to fly planes into the twin towers, disguised as a terror drill. Curt Weldon has appeared in the mainstream media trying to get the truth out about the specific information they had on the hijackers, pre 9/11, which was deliberately isolated from any other agencies.\n\nAs for the bin laden confession tape... it doesn't look like bin laden to me. and the audio was apparently difficult to translate due to the poor quality.\n\nAs for GW Bush himself. He wouldn't really have to know much or anything about it. he doesn't run America. PNAC, the bilderbergs and some oil companies do.\n\nI could go on and on. I just hope we see more FBI and CIA people come out on this. I hope the people responsible are brought to justice and we all stop talking about how we need to invade eastern countries and have compulsory ID cards because 'them radical muslims got us bad'!
71976
I believe that Bin Laden was responsible for the attacks, yes. Unfortunately, people have (a reasonable) tendency to question anything 'official' or 'government-related', so they turn to explanations involving aliens, missiles, CIA, Freemasons, and the Mossad.\n\nHere's the thing : Why the hell would a country send four airplanes to smash into their own buildings, and to kill their own people? That's just stupid.\nAnd if the government is lying, then what happened to the victims? The planes? Saying "it's a conspiracy" tells the families of the dead, and the survivors, that they died for nothing.
1084386
Yes.  I work in politics (as a legislative aide) and I believe there are conspiracies going on at many levels of government.  In the course of my work I have witnessed a government that is corrupt and riddled with conspiracies ... I even get emails inviting me to the secret meetings (I'm being totally honest here), but I don't go as I don't want to be involved in it.\n\nHere is a good article about conspiracy:\nhttp://www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/article_125.shtml
243961
Yes YEs YES. 9/11 was and still is a conspiracy. I've been saying that since that very day. The problem with the US is GWB. That dark day the first thing GWB ask Congress was "How does this involve Iraq?" They said , "What, it doesn't at all" GWB: " I'll ask again...as President 'How does this involve Iraq?" You see 9/11 was just a way to get back to Iraq..he had to start what his daddy started. GHB and GWB are pissed at the US for not electing GHB for a second term. They learned, after Clinton :)serving 8 years that they must make a plan to rig elections and to get people on their side. Their 9/11 plan went to well.  I could go on and on but I think you get my point.\n Take care my firend.
412944
Yea it's Conspiracy, If U have lime wire then Search about 9-11 Conspiracy on Movie. U'll find a Program over there Show U that there was No plain Hit the Pentagon & They Just Say So, & The Plain which Hit the two Building had A Missle on Them ... There Is No Boing Have Missle & There is No Missile even in Cargo plain. & How G.W.Bush told the PPL that He open the TV & watched they show the First Plain hit the Building & They Didn't Capture that one by News Cam & they got it from someone who was capture a fire beside that Building ... Alot U going to Discover on that Movie. To be sure it's the Movie ... Just write on Lime Wire Video search " 911 Conspiracy " & Then find the Movie which have size 498 MB. Then Download it & U'll discover that The Government of USA did Allllllllllllllllll.
1154616
I see a lot of people giving emotional answers talking about sickos, and how it couldn't be our government because "why would they do that?" or "how could they kill their own people?"\n\nWell, for anyone who doesn't believe the government could possibly think about killing innocent people to accomplish some goal they have that seems important to them, look up Operation Northwoods - an operation that was planned by the government to carry out false terrorist attacks and blame them on Fidel Castro and the Cuban Government as a pretext for military intervention in Cuba.  This one didn't actually happen, but it was planned out, so we know that people in the government put a lot of time and effort in thinking about it - and you can now see some of the declassified documents about it online.\n\n  Now, I'm not saying the government planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks for sure, because I don't have enough evidence to judge.  But I don't think it would be impossible, and I certainly don't think there is enough evidence available to disprove the hypothesis.  One thing that seems to be almost certain to me is that the details that the government gave us about 9/11 are not true.  So the question is, why aren't they telling the truth?  What are they hiding from us that is so important to keep secret that they would risk looking like they were involved by omitting hard evidence to the contrary?\n\nAs for reasons the government might have done it, only a few people necessarily needed to know about the plan, not everyone in the goverment, and if those few people were not good judges of morality, and had some cause to think it would be best for the country, some reasons that seem ridiculous to most may seem convincing to them.  For instance, to gain control of oil, or to increase the power of the U.S. government in the middle east, or to increase the profits of the defense industry, etc, etc.\n\nAmong the reasons that the government's details don't match the truth are:\n\n - 9 of the alleged hijackers have apparently turned up alive and obviously not guilty of the alleged hijackings, living in Saudi Arabia.\n\n - The towers fell so fast that physicists have said it is impossible that explosions and fire caused by plane crashes are the only cause of the fall (pointing toward some kind of secondary explosives that must have been the cause).\n\n - There has been a study done to determine the probability of successfully connecting a cell phone call while flying that indicates the calls from the planes were probably faked.\n\n - The towers were engineered to have multiple airplane impacts each, and burn for hours at high temperatures while retaining their structutal integrity - inconveniently, the manager of many of the construction projects in the towers was killed in the attacks.\n\n  I don't know for sure what kind of involvement the government had in the attacks if any, but I do know that they have been irresponsible in satisfying themselves with the conclusions they came to shortly after the attacks and not investigating further to see what really happened, after it has become obvious that their conclusions were clearly incorrect.\n\nFor more scientific information about the cause of 9/11 visit my sources.  Some articles you read about it will be exaggerations, or will seem like "liberal jibberjabber" but don't discredit all of the information simply because one part of it is wrong, or one of the articles goes too far.\n\nRemember, just because someone is talking about a conspiracy doesn't automatically make them wrong - conspiracies are not impossible.  The real conspiracy theorists in this case are the government officials who theorized the obviously false situation about the terrorists who simply flew the planes into the buildings and caused them to fall.