Why does Bush insist on having written copies of questions in advance?
337271
actually he doesnt always require them prewritten...he has been taking impromptu questions and speaking candidly in some town hall meeting formats but like the other answers here i would say to prepare the best answer possible to give out the most information
320987
i think it is because they dont want to take the time. or they just dont care enough to check it. i personally dont use it but i always read what i wrote before i post it so i can catch my errors.
407881
I want George Bush's head on a stake....lol no seriously...I think it's president@whitehouse.gov\n\nAt least that's what it used to be. This president chose to make it very hard for the public to get emails to him at the White House. Maybe that's because he doesn't want to hear from nearly 70% of Americans who disapprove of his job performance.
749507
why are wanting to know this? are you planning on writing a bum check?
1107812
it's like asking why do we write it DOWN, but type it UP? (if ya catch my 'drift')
751576
No it'd probably be something like Clinton's biography. And I guarantee he has most of it written already. Of course, often times they don't actually write it. It's ghostwritten by someone else, because, you know, they might actually be busy at times. I say three years after leaving office.
194397
nope he's distilling the information. not knowing the particulars I'd guess its complicated.. its far better he take the time to research it than make a snap decision based on his personal opinions.(they can do this if they want to).. so it is a good thing. He intends to be fair and impartial basing his decisions on facts
214157
Because they wanna kill someone on papers. If you are on any document, maybe. \nJust kidding.
358442
When you are trying to ask a question the system is also looking at the same time if the question has been asked by someone else earlier. That helps in getting the asker instant access to the answers to the question already asked. Incase your question is different from the 19,000 stored than you would have your own set of answers. I dun think the guys at Yahoo are fool enough to keep their memory full for questions which would not used again. It has a reason and a very good one.
166074
Knowing the answer before the question is asked.
133424
They are questions. They are sometimes used in writing to make sure you add enough detail.
922853
You mean apart from the fact that he is a war mongering cretin that needs to be put out to pasture before he involves the entire globe in terrorist reprisals?\n\nHe isn't the sharpest tool in the box - never was - but his many advisers usually help prevent him making a TOTAL ar** of himself - mostly. \n\nAdmittedly they panic when he does his little walk-about talk abouts - as he relies on his own wit rather than pre-prepared speeches. It tends to get a little wobbly then.\n\nI'm sorry but asking WHY to ANYTHING to do with bush is a bit pointless. The guy isn't half sharp.
1134468
because bush told him to
885359
Yes, and how many different stories has he contrived to try and explain it off. First it was meant for Bush, no apology. Then it was I misquoted from my notes, no apology. Then it was someone else changed my notes, I misspoke and apologize kinda. \n\nhttp://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-pOypG0szd7Pv_X1rQxw_4qCWpA--?cq=1
158579
Written records are definitly the was to preserve the information.  Some people in my family are making videos of their memories, which I don't think will last through the rest of my life, much less for time to come.\n\nWhenever I can, I transcribe the info onto acid free paper, which is expected to last longer than regular paper.  There isn't any real way to record info that will last for generations, unless you do it in stone, the way the ancients did.
302034
Well i think you are President Bush.\nBecause you cant spell, Impersonating and Was.\nand if you are him they cant accuse you of Impersonation.\nIf that is the case then they should reinstate your questions.
984040
this is completely true i did a paper on this\n\n\nconclusion: this is why you dont have bush as a president