Supposedly the Russians are helping Iran build nuclear weapons. What can I, the little guy, do?
344823
You can sit back an take it, hehehe!  Don't woory, son--we're gonna take em DOWN--BRING 'EM ON!!!
889964
I've been questioning their support of Iran, France, and the former leader of Iraq, Saddam Hussein. I know Russia needs money and that need dictates much of what they do. But I'm also very wary that they may have ulterior motives. And I think our Pentagon is aware as well.
1129917
well i cant say but i don't think much about it, i think that maybe there I.C.B.M. missile technology is like 10-15 years less advanced than the U.S.A. or Russia, also there guidance systems are second rate based on 20 year old Russian technology, plus  that much radiation can cause trajectory errors to develop over a short period of time, that and the S.D.I. helps me sleep better. as for how to deal with them, just let them do what there doing until they mess up, and ask for help to fix there mess, them go in and seize all there nukes.
224848
You have as much of a reason do bomb Iran as to bomb the white house!\nUS government is crazy! I don't understand how they manage to control the population so well..? Urgently check for microchips in your brains! (and check that you have a heart and just may be a soul while you are at it!!!)
607880
Good question. It's just harassment and Russia isn't going along with the program. Do you think George Bush could screw up 60 years of negotiations with the cold war with Iran? I do.
775119
But are they only making nuclear power stations? The fear is they will infact use these instalations to make enriched uranium or plutionium for use in nuclear weapons. Iran is an unstable country in the hands of fundementalist Islamic clerics and are sworn to eradicate Judism and Christianity. These people can not be trusted with WMD.
429640
The whole MAD business.  If both sides start using nuclear weapons, the world has a good chance of ending.  So, no one actually uses them.  I'm guessing if Iran actually uses them, the US won't retaliate because no one wants to use nuclear weapons.
16463
Let me guess, you are Russian? \n\nYes, Russia has a lot of nukes. Since the demise of the USSR, the US has gained the advantage of knowing where a lot of them are. Ironically, as part of nuclear reduction agreements, the US actually PAYS Russia to destroy the agreed nuclear weapons. The operations are constantly overseen by US reps. I know this because I met two of these representatives in Votkinsk Russia. They were there monitoring a factory that was dismantling Nukes. As part of the reductions agreements, Russia can also monitor the US, but I guarantee they aren't paying us for it. \n\nSo which country has the best weapons? I would say that the US has more sophisticated weapons than just plan ol ballistic missiles. Nukes are good if want to blow up entire cities--but that isn't a very feasible idea these days. It just doesn't go over very well politically. \n\nSo all in all, yes, Russia has the nukes. But ever since the end of the cold war, the US has continued spending billion and billions on defense while Russia has really let off on their emphasis on nukes and and other weaponry. Yes, they are still developing and creating new weapons, but just not at the rate of the US.
412373
yeah it was Russia. or technologically USA supplying everyone with weapons. \np.s. they still supply the IRA a TERRORIST group. hypocites!
383537
Absolutely nothing, and Iran Knows that they can't do much , they can harm us more then we can harm them.
282748
who's said they don't allow un experts to inspect? UR medias?! Revise you thoughts please. They are based on completely wrong information. Iran is open to the UN. The problem is not professional. There are political problematics issues. \n\nThe problem is that West says Iranian programme is costly and it is not worth investing. They conclude that there might be some army goals beyon this. Iran warned months ago that if they deliver the case to SC, they would resume enrichment programme. Fist, the west announced that they just report and they don't totally deliver the case. They played with Iran a lot. Russia is just taking advantage and does nothing. Iran has lost very much interests and Iranians (People and goverment) aim to revenge anyways. We have paid price a lot for this case. Political and economical. We are under semi-sanction condition. Even no body plays with our soccor national team. I personally hate western governments and I swear I would try my best to revenge. Iranians are willing to support the government in this case and we would all die for our country. Iran will use our all potential forces such as Iraq and Lebanon and Palestine and Syria to oppose the west. As we Iranian say, we try to not let Iran be a simple gobbet for the west.
638789
now .. haven't you opened a can of worms ?!?!?!?\nit is a tough one, mainly because NO ONE can say whether or not there's actually a military (bomb-making) aspect to the "nuclear ambition". \nConstruction of the nuclear power plants in Iran started many years ago, long before the mullahs came to power ... so it's not as if this is something new that the current regime has suddenly come up with. In that sense, and since there is no "proof" of any malicious ;) activity, I personally don't see why not complete power plants on which millions and millions have been spent already. But then again : is there an atomic bomb hiding behind the facade? I don't know ... you don't know ... Bush doesn't know ... the IAEA doesn't know. To be fair, I would say all "countries" are "innocent" unless PROVEN otherwise.
719251
Those with active Nuclear Weapons programs:\nUSA, Russia, China, UK, France, India, Pakistan, Israel\n\nThose without, but who could produce them if desired:\nGermany, Holland, Brazil, Japan, Australia, Canada, Spain, Poland, Hungary, Turkmenestan, Siberia.\n\nThose who may or may not have:\nNorth Korea\n\nIn addition, Iran is trying very hard to acquire the technology to create its own nuclear weapons.
132477
Interesting question.  \n\nOn the one hand, the US and other nations rightly perceive Iran as a threat, and don't want Iran to have the power to build nuclear power plants, as this could lead to nuclear weapons.\n\nOn the other hand, Iran rightly perceives the US as a threat, and the Iranian leadership is responding to that with tough talk, and refusal to back down.  Which then feeds into other countries perceiving Iran as a threat, and it's a vicious circle.\n\nPersonally, I'm not sure what to say.  I don't want Iran to have nuclear weapons, and it would be hard for them to have nuclear power plants without getting access to nuclear weapons technology.  The proposal that Russia refine the uranium that is used in Iranian power plants completely misses the point of the issue, which is independenc/autonomy.  \n\nUnfortunately, I think the short-term answer is a lot of behind-the-scenes diplomacy, ending in face-saving measures for all sides, and a lot of backing down.  Perhaps something like Iran stops trying to develop nuclear power, and other nations help them develop sustainable, clean energy from other sources.  Bet solar panels would be very effective over there.  In private, meanwhile, Western nations would perhaps agree to stop developing new nuclear power plants or nuclear weapons, and claim publically some other reason.  It sounds like we're giving up a lot there, but really we're only giving up things that put us at danger anyway, because it's impossible to make a nuclear plant _completely_ safe from terrorist attack, and the development of new nuclear weapons just leads to proliferation.
752778
Hello?  Israel is our ally.  They need nukes for protection. Iran wants to annihilate them and us.
52865
see what results of Europe's talks(which are becoming worse and worse) then use sanctions and arrange for military capabilities to be optimized against Iran, possibly sending another Aircraft carrier to the region. Get Iraq under control to free up military power in case Iran immerses itself into its Nuke making program. (there is no doubt that it is producing the technology and material to make nukes and has the intention to.)
142681
There are some extremely smart people in Iran, both male and female.  Not the political leaders who are very primitive.  All the smart people are virtual prisoners of the theocratic state system to a greater or lesser degree.\n\nThey certainly can, and may already have atomic bombs.\n\nWhen you combine that with the statements and intentions of the political leadeership it is quite scary.\n\nEven more scary if they decide to foster terrorist objectives anywhere in the world.\n\nObviously this will backfire greatly on them over time, but it is possible something tragic could happen for others, even Russia, Israel, or any other place, like Saudi Arabia.\n\nHaving atomic weapons calls for having your brains under control and accepting international standards of sane and wise policies.\n\nThe Iranians are the only ones who can solve this dilemma, it must involve actual and overt policy and believable statements.\n\nAnything else is a doom scenario, with the worst doom on the Iranians themselves.\n\nSo far, it appears they do not understand this.  They are starting to feel very powerful and influential like Hitler, pre-World War II.  Will they make similar decisions?