wat's the diff between Samba 2 and Samba 3?
355700
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/upgrading-to-3.0.html
92683
- There is no difference between Data Access Object 3.5 and Data Access Object 3.6.\n- Only a few patches added which cannot be identificed since its internal handling large database.\n- all the best.\n-------------
356986
oh, i didn't even know u can have two kinda versions in yo pc, thanks for that info and let me know when yu find out
237353
The cl2.5 might be faster but I would argue that nobody could tell the difference in when playing the game if you had to like systems with one using 2.5 and the otehr using cl3. The guys that make these comments use testing tools to give them framerates and such which can show the difference, the user can't see that little of a difference.\n\nAs always more ram is better on XP however 1GB or 2GB in most games is not going to make much difference either. I said most games, some will use just about all the memory you can throw at it.
977860
They are both the same, along with CD+R/W  it just means that one u can use over and over again and the other you can right to just once.  both hold 700MB. Your program u use to burn your data, there is always setting to "Overburn" but it can damage the disc or the drive.
545980
2000 has less network compatibilities then 2003. But one new tecnology is added to 2003 is that... its support image writing... its means if you have two harddisk then both of them will have the same data but still they work separately inside windows.
807497
The biggesst difference is transfer speed.  Most devices meant for USB 2 will throttle down, but if you are doing something like copying a hard drive, you will really see it.  If you are using a USB dvd player, it likely won't work without USB 2.  Upgrade requires a PCI card which runs about 20 to 30 dollars.
775699
Yes, though it is not going to be as efficient.  It should not have any problems.  Server 2003 is pretty much the same as W2K except is has more features.  Hard to find out exactly what you are looking for, but feel free to follow up.
693319
Well, depending on the OS you want to use ie, Windows Server or a Linux / UNIX Distro, there are allot of resources for setting up a server, there are many different types of servers as well, web server, ftp server app server, mail server, dhcp / dns, and so on. \nI would suggest a Linux / UNIX distro running Samba 3, that will allow communication between Windows and UNIX. \n\nhttp://www.freebsd.org is a good reference with allot of tutorials on how to accomplish what you need. best part, it is free.
184614
You can visit these links. The first two contain only freeware products and the others contain shareware as well, but they have a large database!
537175
Perhaps it was asking if you knew FM2, which stands for File Manager 2 from Clarion. Its a revolutionary tool that simplifies the hassles involved in upgrading your products.You can check it out at http://www.capesoft.com/accessories/fm2sp.htm
902282
the difference is transmission of data\n\nddr is double data rate\n\n\nddr2 is next version of ddr
17941
Hi,\n\nThis is pretty easy and you'll enjoy the pleasure of easy install on freebsd through ports collection or packages.\nIf you use th eports collection update :\ncd /usr/ports/net/samba3;\nmake install clean\n\nor with packages :\npkg_add -r samba3\n\nThen I strongly suggest that you follow the instructions from the FreebSD handbook you can find at :\nhttp://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-samba.html\n\nLean on the handbook for any need regarding your FreebSD tuning installs or customizations ;-)\n\nRegards
556858
There is not much difference, both are writeable CDs. They say that +R is more compatible with most of the computers existing today.
521016
Well USB 2.0 is way faster than serial.  I would go with USB.\nUSB 1.0 goes 12 Mbps vs. Serial goes 115 Kbps.
49777
Their difference are based on their application, interface and speed.  Due to the broadness of your question, let me give a small detail on how they would differ:\n\nRS-232: intended for data rate less than 20 kbps\nRS-422: similar to RS-232 but uses differential signalling.\nRS-485:  descendant of RS-422, which can be use for a bus or multi-drop.\n\nFor more just go to these websites:\n\nQuick comparison of RS-232, RS-422, and RS-485:\nhttp://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/2CABB3FD5CAF2F8686256F1D005AD0CD?OpenDocument\n\nSelecting and using RS-232, RS-422, and RS-485:\nhttp://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/2CABB3FD5CAF2F8686256F1D005AD0CD?OpenDocument\n\nHope they'll help since the question you asked is pretty broad.
569820
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/whyupgrade/win2k/w2ktows03-2.mspx\n\nhere's the official whitepaper