For those of us who love the Clintons?
355440
Since when is stating facts propaganda? Let's face it, the Clintons are the people who gave white trash a bad name in the first place. His value began and ended with just how entertaining he was. \nWho could forget the old "but I didn't inhale" bit? He was only elected because there was nothing good was on television back in '92, or '96 for that matter.
245032
No, I think his relationship with Hillary is safely buried with him.\n\nBesides, we've already elected a Clinton with pizz poor morals, we're desensitized to it now.
634671
I would love to have H. Clinton as our next President, because I am a big fan of Fox News.  Whenever H. CLinton screw up Fox could invite her here for a blow job.\n\nI heard that Mr. Murdoch is hiring her as the next hooker for Fox.\n\n(CBS) NEW YORK To call them a political odd couple would be a rash understatement.\n\nConservative media mogul Rupert Murdoch will host a fundraiser for liberal New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, the Financial Times reports.\n\nThe mating ritual of the unlikely allies has been under way for months. Clinton set political tongues to wagging last month by attending a Washington party celebrating the 10th anniversary of Fox News, the cable news channel owned by Murdoch.\n\nThe Times quoted one unnamed source as describing the Clinton-Murdoch connection in this way: "They have a respectful and cordial relationship. He has respect for the work she has done on behalf of New York. I wouldn't say it was illustrative of a close ongoing relationship. It is not like they are dining out together."\n\nThe fundraiser will take place in July, the newspaper said. Clinton is the frontrunner for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, though she has not indicated whether or not she will run.\n\nClinton has worked hard to take the edge off her reputation as a card-carrying liberal. She has has collaborated with congressional conservatives on some peices of elgislation, called for a "common ground" on abortion and cut a political figure some on the left see as decidedly un-liberal.
1016127
Hillary!!! She's da Man!!!
389319
HEY I DONT KNOW IF YOURE GEORGE OR NOT, BUT UMM... I LOVE GEORGE BUSH!!! HES THE GREATEST! I NEVER ONCE DOUBT MR.BUSH I RESPECT HIM AND HIS FAMILY, OH AND MR BUSH IF YOU DO READ THIS EMAIL ME, darkstar7977@yahoo.com
1170723
YES........  I would do it all over again.. Even though he can be a real pain in my ***, sometimes....  I have invested so much energy into him and the things we have overcome and survived through, have no doubt made us stronger and more committed to each other.  And the fact that he has given me the ~BEST part of him with our two beautiful baby girls.~  He is more beautiful today than the day we met and I thought he was oh wow so damn fine when we met. He charmed my pants right off of me... And I think that one big factor is that he still does........~  Thank you for the trip down memory lane.......!~  He will get a Special treat just because of you...........~   Sorry I guess that was too much information, wasn't it?!
400276
whose against Clinton.  I love clinton in a political way of course.  If you could love a person in a political way.  Clinton tbanks for caring about every American even the conservatives.  Unlike Bush.
274320
exactly. do you know the bush family has been running the witehouse for more than 26 years? yes, clinton was their bich http://www.philipdru.com/triplett_stream.html http://www.philipdru.com/webb_stream.html
955558
guys, i would just like to tell you that I AM BILL CLINTON'S COUSIN.\n*sigh*, it was nice to get that off my chest.\n\n:)
724506
I Love my Country!!  I believe in my President...I may not agree with him on every issue, but unless I was President I don't think I would agree with everything ANYone did in the oval office....I also know that having Bush in office is FAR better than having ANY democrat in office!!!!
297857
Yes I like them very much and I  love the country too.
472062
I am a Democrat, a real one.  One who believes in free speech, not speech just for my side.  One who believes in free expression, including of religion.  One who believes in equality, not special rights for certain groups.  One with ethics.\n\nI would never vote for First Lady Hilliary Clinton (respectful, always for the service she did our country, regardless of patriotic disagreement with some of the Clinton administration's policies), because she calls people names, spreads unfounded rumors, and even lies when it serves her purpose.  I would not vote for anyone who did so, and would hope that Republicans will continue to seek ethical, responsible men for their political ticket.\n\nOther real Democrats (not the childishly boorish people who are presently claiming the title) and I will be seeking an ethical representative for our party ticket.  One who is an American first, who respects majority vote and our electoral system, and has a party affiliation second.\n\nKeep speaking up with good questions like this, and don't tolerate the name-calling, sedition, and rumor-spreading, regardless of who does it.  Certainly don't elect them.\n\nExpect a person of character for the Democratic ticket in time.  We're back, and standing UP for the U.S.A. again.
227623
Of course!\nI love my wife and my mom. That's two!
147195
my all time favorite president is BIG Slick willy himself\n William Jefferson Clinton his eight years in office did more for or country than the previous two presidents conbined
70783
I would frefer it be Hillary Clinton.
1174650
With so may reasons to despise Clinton where do I start?\n\nFirst, it's not the fact that he "had a couple of girlfriends." This would be fine were he single. Unfortunately Bill was married and had a child which means he is an adulterer. There goes his integrity. Next, Clinton lied while under oath while being questins about the Whitewater dealings and his relationship with Lewinsky. He also acted to obstruct justice. There goes more integrity and honesty.\n\nFor the record, Bill should have told Ken Starr to get bent when he was asked about Lewinsky. Monica had nothing to do with Whitewater.\n\nAfter that comes the supposed "budget surplus" that the US had under Bill. We had that "surplus" becuase Bill simply gutted the Military's and the Intelligence Community's budget so they had tons more to spend on their social programs such as welfare.\n\nOf course, the fact that the Intelligence Communities no longer had the proper funding they needed had no had in their failure to detect and prevent the September 11th attacks I'm sure. \n\nWhat also aided the attacks were the laws which Bill signed into law which greatly restricted the flow of information between the FBI, CIA, NSA and other state and federal law enforcement agencies.\n\nNext was the fact that Clinton authorized the sale of ballistic missille technology to the Chinese which allowed them to go from a no-threat nation to a first-strike capability nation and now, suddenly North Korea is also developing their missille technology in leaps and bounds.\n\nFurther is how BIll wholly deplored the military, evidenced by his cutting their budgeting, yet sending them on every single peacekeeping operation possible. Worst of all of all of these was Operation Restore Hope and the Battle of Mogadishu in1993. \n\nOperation Restore Hope was an utter failure on a number of levels. This was the first time that US troops were wholly under the command of a UN entity. In previous peacekeeping missions the US called the shots. Not so here. Also, Clinton refused to authroize the armor unit and C-130 Spectre gunships that would normally provide support for our troops. Also, Clinton refused the troops the authority to conduct night-time raids where our superior technology would give our soldiers an significant advantage.\n\nOur soldiers were a few thousad in a city of hundreds of thousands. Running night-time operations, armor and air support were critical and Clinton wholly ignored the recommendations of his military leaders and those in Somolia time and again. Task Force Ranger is specially trained, equipped and deployed to run night-time missions and Clinton simply used them as cannon fodder.\n\nOn Oct 3-4th the US forces attempted to capture a local warlord named Mohamed Farrah Aidid. After the battle in which 19 US soldiers dies and scores more wounded Clinton decided to pull the US forces due to negative polls numbers.\n\nThis lead to the impression that the US would back down after a loss.\n\nThen there were a staggering number of terrorist attacks against US interests during Clinton reign.\n\nThe USS Cole.\nThe Khobar Towers\nUS Embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya\nFirst attack on the World Trade Center\n\nIn response to the Embassy bombing Clinton destroyed an aspiriin factory.\n\nWow.  \n\n"President Bill Clinton announced the attacks in a TV address, saying the target was terror. Some, however, saw this as a way of attracting attention away from the Lewinsky scandal. On August 17, three days prior to the missile strike, President Clinton admitted in a nationally televised address that he had an inappropriate relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. This address followed President Clinton's grand jury testimony earlier that day (see Wag the Dog)."\nQuote from the last link provided.\n\nIt's also important to note that every claim that the left makes against Bush re the war in Iraq Clinton did as well.\n\nT
142104
Clinton >> why ... asked Monica loooooooooool