what you think about the World Trade Organization (WTO)? will it work in the future?
345769
yes ofcourse with highly eficiant.
6246
A definate yes. It's hard to implement though, especially with the current state of the economy and government...
544963
Yes !\n\n- Communication is instant (Email/IM/Skype..)\n- Answers to most of your questions are available in less than a minute (Google, Yahoo Answers)\n- Global Thinking is very much in vogue, so we all share a great deal of concerns and thoughts (blogs, portals)\n- We can trade anything from anywhere (Amazon, ebay)\n\nWe could go on and on...Our horizons have expanded to cover the entire world.
214881
Free Trade is good for the economy, nation and bridges people from different parts of the world. You should not think like a racist. People make the good world.\nPeople from all parts depend upon each other one way or the other.
1066848
That is very nice of you but it really isn't a fair trade. If all who want amnesty want to trade maybe than it would be fair. Do you think that will happen?
205993
Welcome to NAFTA.. and the wonderful things it brought us.  \n\nIn my opionion, and this is just me, fork over the few extra bucks and get cable, if it's available.  DSL, was nothing but a straight up pain in the hind quarter!
827826
The world works on trade. Having open lines of communications is vital.
355345
It doesnt really matter if you are for or against it. It is only going to happen at an increasing rate as countries like China and India continue to expand their economies. For those that just take the attitude that think it is a bad thing, you are going to be left behind. You would be much better off to understand it and become part of it.
398744
I was gonna say wikipedia is your friend, but it doesn't seem to be in this case.\n\nNext (and this probably should always be done first), I went to check the original source. The WTO website.. and I'm not having much luck yet.\n\nI'll report back when I find something.
45863
It's fine. That's what happens in a global economy. The people that do it the best and for the best price will get the job. So unless the U.S. can do it better there's no reason to object.
61835
Without significant reform it is unlikely to continue with a meaningful existance, but I think most western nations will force this to happen before allowing it to completely dissolve.\n\nAt the end of the day it is a forum to get the nations of the world around a single table. Naturally, it is not possible to drive clear consensus in such situations. So it is difficult to criticize it because of inaction or slowness. I doubt there is a silver bullet to that particular problem.\n\nTo think the UN can resolve major issues facing the world today is niaive. At the end of the day that will fall on the shoulders of the larger nations. What it cannot do is get in the way. It must ensure dialogue is flowing and that diplomatic solutions are pursued to global issues. However once these grind to a halt or fail, it must excuse itself from the proceedings.
700592
It depends on what the conflict is.  WTO handles some items. \nThe UN handles others. \nThird parties volunteer to hear the case as a mediator.  \nSome times just plain battling it out in the media.\nSome times secret negotiations. \nand probably other methods.
1038308
In my opinion...\n\nI can't think of any pros for the new world order.  First you have to ask what exactly is the new world order.  The people who are shaping the world, telling us what we want and need, the ones who control the doctrinal system are in it for the money.  The new world order is a large economic game of us vrs. them.  By "us" I mean the top 5 percent of the population.  Under terms like NAFTA or CAFTA american business is trying to pry open lucrative trade while keeping american exports expensive and well tariffed.  Also, american corporations over the past few decades have fought very hard to force down the living wage of U.S. citizens.  The system is unsustainable without mass poverty doing production on one side and heavy consumerism on the other.  I fear that the disparity between profit, wage loss and consumerism might trigger slavery.  Why not, we are already being taught to hate and live in fear.\n\nEconomic aid from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) was originally set up to help rebuild war torn countries economies after WWII.  Today the World Bank and IMF lend money to countries to help them out of economic problems.  But, the loans come with lots of strings attached which often leads to the complete economic destruction of the country.  This is achieved by forcing the country to open up to free trade and also by forcing the country to privatise it's resources and utilities.  Of course the whole loan is backed up by the US treasury who makes a killing and it's the american companies that get to go in and buy up the recently "for sale" resources and utilities.\n\nThe NWO really has nothing to do with democracy, just economics.\n\nlong winded, sorry...
1025240
The interesting thing about the global economy is that pertains to the entire world and all of its countries. The global economy must be healthy in order for nations to prosper economically, also, the economy can't exist without money - thus we must have enough fair trade to let less wealthy nations get involved in exportation. The idea of fair trade is definitely one of the most essential issues when discussing the global economy because of the monopolization that certain countries having on certain items, this only pushes the less wealthy countries to the side and lessens the chances of their possibly prosperity. The global economy should be fair. Fair for everyone in order to get a bunch of money. That's what life is all about, getting money. MONEY=HAPPINESS.
182339
Of Course it would. All Credible Economist agree. Its a no brainer. Its better in everyway.\n\nThem sending money abroad is a loss for us. But the work they provide is much more valuable. A simple example.\nA worker gets payed 2000 a month, sends 500 and keeps 1500 to spend here. The work they do helps Developers Make Millions, then Spend their money here to make more money and on...  Its all part of the Global Enonomy. The family in mexico will probably use the money to buy Cells phones etc.. which are made by Motorola, a US company. Do you see ? its very complex and simple at the same time. Alot of people dont get it.
504536
FREE trade pact?  Nothing comes free.\nJust like every other foreign country, they will find some way to stick it to us.   Never fails.
231110
The merchants or the traders were, are and will be necessary bridge between producers and end-users. Of course I am talking about the merchants of commodities trading where merchant should have full set of logisitics, price risk management and marketing systems. Due to this factors merchant always will be in need in our globalizing world trade market. The main is what you are going to trade with?