Assess the argument that there is nothing wrong with “facial discrimination"?
348632
If a disabled person, whose disability was they were facially disfigured were asked to leave a restaurant by the management because other diners had complained about having to look at unusual faces, that would be discrimination under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (in England). \n\nI imagine the Americans with Disabilities Act 1992 has a similar jurisdiction over such cases.\n\nBeing attracted or repelled by someone is not something you can control. It is what you do about it that may constitute discrimination (in the legal sense of that word).
685940
I agree with you that it does occur, though I feel people too often cry discrimination just so they can get something out of it, not necessarily because it truly occurred.  Sorry if that's not really an opposing argument, but perhaps it will add another angle to your paper?
809953
no , but you may have a discrimination case
1170525
Yes.  I wouldn't try it because judging by your question you don't understand some of the basic propositions.  Every decision made by everyone involves discrimination -- selecting between options.  A court case involving discrimination involves proof of the type of discrimination (race and religion as opposed to some lawful type of distinction) and who was doing the discriminating (a government, a public accomodation or a private person), the damages, the method of proof, mixed motives and dozens of other variables. \n\n I am free to discriminate based on race.  I can decide to only allow certain races to visit my home.  Governments are not free to make that distinction.  However, governments are free to make all kinds of other distinctions and to discriminate based on legitimate criteria.   Thus if you think that "discrimination" without more is the basis for a "case" against someone, you are mistaken.
508395
(1) There is no any argument .It is very beautiful.\n\n(2) But beautiful  is a relative concept why one sees thing as beautiful another one can see it as ugly.\n\n(3) The most important factor for Determining the beauty  is solely depended on the way you look at.
312792
Opt out of racism.\nNo one can challenge you.
620357
yah u have the right of freedom to express and its ur fundamental right.so nothing wrong in it whn everything is right......
536543
Understand that some of these answers may be offensive to some people.\n\nI'll go with answer D.
361488
Not all people think it's OK anyway.\nBut if you're against a certain group, you will feel that it's OK to be a racist against them and you will defend the other groups that you're not against.
177850
Appearing politically correct to others.
425342
Thats like saying that our opinions about ourselves are void unless a man has validated them first. I find that a very old fashioned and offensive point of view. If a man decides that we are ugly or worthless then should we accept that?!
1112709
Fear of the thought police!!! Honesty used to be the best policy until every word you say became scrutinized for any hint of offensiveness - in any meaningful discussion there are generally at least two sides so someone is going to find something to be offended by.  In truth political correctness creates roadblocks to the dynamic thinking and creative dialog that has served human kind since the beginning.  As long as there are people like you asking the question we are not doomed - keep questioning everything it is the only way to achieve wisdom.
989969
Personally, I try very hard not to pre-judge someone on their appearance. There are times, though when their actions immediately makes me think " I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire." As far as being more, or less acceptable. I can't say. I've encountered reverse discrimination alot, because most of my friends are of another race.
844297
Yes ofcourse, I would think many stereotypes are valid but only when stated properly in the form of a generalization. Why else would they exist? But you must decide whether there's a difference between a "stereotype" and a "generalization". Most people use the two ideas interchangably. If what ur using or talking about is really a generalization, then ur not making an absolute or undebatable statement on something. Stereotype's are usually invalid when they claim to be absolute or undebatable by using words like "always", or "never". If however, it's presented as a generalization using words like "most" "usually" etc, then it could be valid statement. And for that reason, many stereotypes can be all or partially valid. Or they would never have appeared in the first place. But I think in ur question you are also refering to  those fashionable constructs about people that place them into groups. Those relationships between a person and some behaviour or artical of clothing that puts everything into one package. Well, even some of those constructs must have some basis for having come along. My best advise is when deciding about whether a particular idea is valid or not ...try exercising some of ur own analytical skills as well. Don't simply accept everything that peers, fashion or media may be stating.
198450
doesnt it say that nobody can be discriminated against based on race?
598041
I'm against it. Racism in a "positive" way is still racism. People should be chosen based on qualification, not based on race.
1115112
Absolutely not!  I don't think you have to justify your personal convictions to anyone.  Finally, finally, someone in this category that makes perfect sense to me!\n\nOur technicolor skin/blood lines should be the least of our worries, or I would have to give thought to the ridiculous news on this category that whites will be extinct!   I told a story once in a seminar about two Indian kids sending smoke signals to each other in the New Mexico desert near Trinity Site.  Just about then, the H-Bomb was tested, and when the huge cloud of smoke exploded, one kid said to the other:  "I wish I could've said thaaaaat!"\n \n\nYour wisdom shines!  I wish I could've said that.  Thank you, madam.  Have a great holiday!