Is there a larger number than the infinite one?
343556
Yes, there are variou sizes of infinity. These numbers are collectively known as transfinite numbers.\n\nThe set of all integers and the set of all squares are in a 1-to-1 correspondence with one another, and both are infinite., Both are aleph-null, in Cantor's terms. But there is a bigger infinity aleph-one, the set of all real numbers, for example, has aleph-one members.
1008854
Dont be fooled by the guy that might answer "Infinity plus one."  You know the problem with that.  How about "Infinity times infinity."
844343
Numbers never end because for any one we care to name, we can add something infinitely large or small to it to produce still another number which is larger than the first. \n\nSome mathematicians may dispute your assertion that we don't need that many numbers, because what might not be practical today can turn out to be years or centuries down the road.  For example, the development of the concept of infinity ultimately led to the development of the calculus, a powerful tool in just about every advanced and worthwhile endeavor undertaken by man.
12883
how do you count to infinity?
315917
Numbers are infinite therefore there is no "biggest number".
448118
Oh jeeze, are you serious LOL.......ok lets say: 999,349,843,928,999,344,576,345,768,324,999 gazilliontrillionbazillion........
1006205
pi is infinite, calculated out to at least a billion digits right now, and it has no iterations (meaning repeated numbers)...so there would be no final digits....
1062482
Infinity is NOT a number; it is simply never ending.\n\nTo answer your question about infinity minus infinity, here is probably the simplest way to explain this: infinity minus infinity has three possible answers: 0, infiity, and some constant I will provide an example for each answer using one anology:\n\nImagine you have a bag of infinite marbles. What would happen if you removed ALL the marbles in the bag, you would have none in the bag (thus infinity minus infinity is zero).\n\nWhat happens if you remove all the even numbered marbles? Since there is an infinite number of even marbles, as well as an infinite number of odd numbered marbles, you have infinity minus infinity equaling infinity (all the infinite even marbles were removed, but there are still an infinite number of odd marbles in the bag).\n\nWhat happens if you want to have all but 3 marbles in the bag? You have to remove the all of them but 3. Thus infinity minus infinity equals a constant.\n\nTo answer your question about (0/0) - (0/0) This is simply undefined: you CANNOT devide by 0. An undefined value does not necessarily mean that it is infinite; there is a difference.\n\nInfinity divided by invinity will provide you the same answers as the subtraction problem. Zero raised to any power will always be 1 and infinity raised to the infinite power will more than likely be infinity.\n\n\nI hope this answers your question as to the concept of infinity.
741456
mathematics has to have a number but normally God is infinite so mathematics can't take on infinity
597363
100\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers
1115436
The number is not defined.\n\nLots of people are saying things like...\n"0.000...00001"\n"1/x as x approaches infinity"\n\nThese numbers, technically, are the same as 0.\n\n"n^0" --- ok that's just not thinking. If n <> 0 or n <> inf, then any n^0 = 1.\n\nProof:\nLet 0* be a number infinitely close to 0.\n0* = 1 - .999....\n.999... = 3 * (.333...) // Because 3*3 = 9 no matter how many time you do it.\n.999... = 3 * (1/3 )  // Exact fractional representation\n.999... = 1\nTherefore, 0* = 1 - 1, and 0* = 0.\n\nAs for the answer, the "smallest", non-zero real number does not exist. Well, we know that it "should" exist. It just doesn't.\n\nExcept on computers. That's another problem entirely. Because computers have a data limit, they do actually have a smallest real number >0
979261
A little over infinite
605317
Numbers, such interesting topics. Think of it like this. If you have one tomato, and you add another one, you have two. add another one, you have three. This process never ends. although, scientists are still researching about what infinity is. for now, we shall stick with what we got.
664717
I'm not sure what you are asking, but yes, there are an infinite number of numbers between 1 and 0.  \n\nIn fact, the whole numbers are the smallest group of infinities on the number line.  The infinite set of irrational numbers far exceed the whole numbers.\n\nTherefore, if you were to have all of the numbers on a number line, and you were to throw a dart, the probability of you hitting a whole number with that dart is basically zero!
777824
Let P be the largest known number.\nThen P+1 is an even larger number. \nWhatever number you can name a larger one can  always be obtained by adding 1.\n\nIn fact, you can go wild and raise the largest known number to the 1 trillionth power and raising that result to some other huge number. \n\nWhy in the world should there be a limit to numbers?  Man created them and they can be as large or as small as he/she pleases. Only the Almighty could make it otherwise. And if he did, you would be asking, "Why is there a limit to the size of numbers"?
155180
No, it's an infinite decimal sequence (as far as we know) so far Pi has over 400,000,000 digits, you can see them over on this page, http://www.hepl.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp/docs/pif500.text.gz
504653
The set of all fractions {1/N} is equinumerous(the same size) to the positive integers N. They are both infinite sets.\n\nc does not really apply as it is a value, not dealing with set theory, but it's value is infinity, meaning it's larger than any value you can think of. If you are talking about the set {lim(x->0) 1/x}, then it only has one element, making it much smaller than a & b\n\n"a) and b) are of equal size, though if you take any fractions instead of just those between 0 and 1, you will get that a) is the largest. I attended a lecture about this a while ago, hence I can't remember the arguments, but the lecturer clearly concluded that there are more fractions than integers."\n\nThis is almost correct. If you just take all the fractions between 0 & 1 it will be a larger set than b. Since 1/N is equinumerous with N+, it follows that 2/N is equinumerous as well. All the fractions between 0 & 1 would include 1/N, 2/N, 3/N, etc. making it much larger than N+