acura rsx  vs acura rsx type s  0-60?
348385
2003 Acura RSX Type S  6.7 seconds\n2002 Acura RSX         7.0 seconds\n\nSorry there not the same year, but i didnt knotice anything that changed between the two\n\nHope this helped
451436
Dollar for dollar, you will be better off selling the 1990 and using the money to purchase a newer Honda/Acura (if that is you preference).  Putting more HP/Torque in a 1990 takes much more work and money than you will anticipate.  That era of car was not designed for that.  The newer cars have structural strength in critical areas needed to handle the power, and the suspensions/drivetrain are designed for the power/torque.
128390
C- Compact E- Economy S- Sedan CL - Coupe Sedan, SL Coupe
196417
Eclipse: Base FWD model equipped with a 140 hp 2.0 L 16-valve DOHC Chrysler 420A engine \n\nEclipse RS: Equipment Upgraded FWD model equipped with a 140 hp 2.0 L 16-valve DOHC Chrysler 420A engine \n\nEclipse GS: Equipment upgraded FWD model equipped with a 140 hp 2.0 L 16-valve DOHC Chrysler 420A engine \n\nEclipse GS Spyder: Convertible FWD model equipped with a 141 hp 2.4l 16-valve SOHC Mitsubishi 4G64 engine \n\nEclipse GS-T: Hardtop FWD model equipped with a 210 hp turbocharged 2.0 L 16-valve DOHC Mitsubishi 4G63 engine \n\nEclipse GS-T Spyder: Convertible FWD model equipped with a 210 hp turbocharged 2.0 L 16-valve DOHC Mitsubishi 4G63 engine \n\nEclipse GSX: AWD model equipped with a 210 hp turbocharged 2.0 L 16-valve DOHC Mitsubishi 4G63 engine
287174
I owned a SR20DE (01 Nissan Sentra SE)- this engine is nearly indestructible, the reason I bought one. I would thrash that car on a daily basis, and it gave me 75,000 trouble free miles. The engine dates back to the early 90's SE-R and also showed up in the 200sx and Infiniti G20. The Turbo showed up on more sporty cars like the Silva. The turbo charged versions (SR20DET) have been documented in many tuner magazines and from what I remember could be tuned up and over 400hp. \n   In direct comparison, the internal makeups of theses two engines is the biggest difference. Every thing in the SE20DET is built for heavy lifting(bigger thicker rods..etc..). The Ka24DE(T) is made of lighter parts, which obviously make them more susceptible to breakage.\n   I say old ways are best, there is a huge information base the SE20DET, the KA24DE(T) is only a few years old, hence less support and less knowledge.
108884
In the 1967 camaro:\n\nSS Package included modified 5.7 L (350 in³) V8 engine (first engine of that size by Chevrolet), also L35 396 in³ (6.5 L) "big block" was available. SS featured non-functional air inlets on the hood, special striping and SS badging on grill, gas cap, and horn button. It was possible to order both RS and SS packages to receive RS/SS Camaro. In 1967 Camaro RS/SS Convertible Camaro with 396 in³ (6.5 L) engine paced the Indianapolis 500 race. \n\nZ28 option code was introduced in December 1966 for the 1967 model year. This option package wasn't mentioned in any sales literature so was unknown by most of the buyers. The only way to order Z28 package was to order base Camaro with Z28 option, front disc brakes, power steering and Muncie 4-speed transmission. Z28 package featured unique 302 in³ (4.9 L) "small block" engine, designed specifically to compete in the Sports Car Club of America(SCCA) Trans Am racing series (which required engines smaller than 305 in³ (5.0 L) and public availability of the car). Advertised power of this engine was listed at 290 hp (216 kW) while actual dyno readings rated it at 360 to 400 hp (269 to 298 kW). Z28 also came with upgraded suspension and racing stripes on the hood. It was possible to combine Z28 package with RS package. Only 602 Z28's were sold. Contrary to popular belief, 1967 Z28s did not have raised cowl induction hoods like 69 Z28s did. In 1967 the optional Z28 cowl induction received air from a cowl plenum duct attached to the side of the air cleaner that ran to the firewall and truly got air from the cowl vents. The hood was a standard flat hood. 1967 Z28s had 15" Rallye wheels, while all other 1967 Camaros had 14" wheels. The Z28 could be combined with the RS appearance package.
472475
Try here:\n\nhttp://www.honda-acura.net/forums/showthread.php?t=53080
274477
Mazda Miata.  Its racing success in SCCA should solidify its position as your obvious choice.  It is an extremely underrated car and yet, it is the only one in your price range that is capable of autocross, track racing, and drifting while being a fairly newer car with less maintainence concerns.
301793
well the 350z still has problems with alignment issues which are costly and are not covered by warranty. new eclipse looks like a catfish,Honda s2000 would be an exellent choice.....
464972
I'd rather be driving a 1960s chevy than my 92 Sentra. You're comparing 2 different things...cars/buildings and health. It's like asking, Isn't it weird that computers are soooo fast nowadays...but tortoises are so slow? Would going back to Black screened, green lettered computers make tortoises faster?
243765
The CODO Camero 427 a factory race car with over 500horsepower or a 1967 stingray with the high compression 427 engine with about 560 hp even through they rated it at 430hp for insurance reasons
668302
It was a 69 camaro RS for a Mercury Villager...that was about 13 years ago. But, got a Harley to make up for it about two years ago :) Life is about change, in my case, its trading one toy for another :)
295832
The technology is not so advance at least in PSTN techology.\nYou need to get same old RJ 11.
292256
Between 15.0 and 15.5 the mods you listed wont help as much as you think they will. That time is probably that of a new car and not 1 that is almost 20 years old.
402215
Toyota Tacoma, looks better than the Colorado, and its a TOYOTA!!
23962
I would probably buy the Evolution.  I used to own a WRX and traded it in for an Evo 8.  But it totally depends on your taste.  If you intend to do high performance driving events on race tracks, the Evo is your car.  But I suspect the STI (the lowercase i was dropped in 2006) is an easier car to live with, more luxurious, less turbo lag, and a better ride.  All the comparisons I've read between the two say it's pretty much too close to call, (though almost always slightly in the evo's favor) but that's my opinion.\n\nThe Evo MR actually has better ride and handling thanks to the bilstein shocks and aluminum roof.  I also feel that the steering is much more direct and communicative on the Evo than it is with the STI.  And with the six speed, it is slightly less buzzy, but it's no luxo cruiser by any means.  Also, the Evo is MUCH more spacious than the WRX inside.  Six footers can fit reasonably comfortably in the back, which is not the case with the WRX.  Most importantly, the Evo also has a rear wiper and a rear armrest, both missing on the STI.  \n\nThe 2006 STI has a number of improvements, including a yaw sensor on the DCCD and a new center differential.  Subaru has been relentless in their pursuit of the Evo and the latest STI is undoubtedly the best ever.  But relative to the standard vehicle, the Evo is more highly modified.  The Evo has forged suspension links all around, and only shares doors and a trunk lid with the stock car.  The STI has standard Impreza bodywork with the exception of the hood.  In day to day use, this is not really an issue but the Mitsubishi is a better track car.\n\nThe R32 is a good but very different car.  It's not in production anymore, but it employes a part time automatically engaging awd system that is not always sending torque to the rear wheel.  It is a variable torque split system, but it's inferior to the system in the other two cars.  It is much more luxurious but more of a competitor for a MazdaSpeed 6 than either the Evo or STI.  In terms of interior quality, it is of course no contest.  No one touches the VW interiors at their price.\n\n-datapoint: The Evo is again on this year's list of Automobile Magazine all stars
275471
the biggest compare will be the price the Camaro is bigger and needs mores gas the Honda is quicker and smaller but a deathtrap you would own the Camaro sooner than you would the Honda, i would choose the Camaro just because of the price difference