what arre the three reasons why industry increased at such a rapid pace in the late 1800's and early 1900's
346228
technology----assembly lines-unions
447802
Technological growth has been following an exponential curve.
903329
1 After Henry Ford introduced the assembly line at his Ford Motor Company, it made mass production of automobiles easier. More production resultis in cheaper prices so more people could easily afford to buy the model T. When people bought the affordable cars, it was faster access to jobs, people would leave the house more, and be able to go to travel to destinations not possible before.\n\n2. People became fascinated with movies and radio's possibly because they were affordable for the average middle class person to purchase. People were astonished with how they worked and the special effects of movies caused people to be amazed, luring them to see more and more movies.
575908
Because the natural resource of copper as well as all other\nmetals are rising too.\n\nThe natural resources like copper, gold, and silver are rising because its consumption is rising. The cause of the rising consumption and prices is because asian countries\nare building at a (China and India) phenomenal rate.\n\nBack to the rule of supply and demand. Growth countries are consuming more, faster than you can dig the metal out of the ground.
444278
Look way beyond Henry Ford...check out the Industrial Revolution...England, factories....look at the pyramids!  A perfect example of a production line industry...
662134
In what ways did American ideology represent the growth of industry and mechanical technology, and how does that compare to the way it is addressed in creative literature? \nHow did the labor movement effect the growth of industry at the turn of the century?\nHow were local artisan-craftsmen affected by the growth in mechanical technology and mass production?
587836
it brought better technology \n+ railroads\nregulate economic systems
923001
1 No longer needed kids to help on farm.\n2 There was more gadgets to own thanks to industrialization and less money for kids.\n3 Men who work 12hrs a day at a factory don't have time like farmers to make kids.
355583
There is the Colonial 1700's and such, we refer to the 1800's as Victorian/industrial revolution - taken by the style of building which we copied.  The Gold Rush. The roaring twenties/Art deco.  The depression.  As a younger country they tend to break it apart by decade for easy reference in the 1800's and throughout the 1900's.
260048
There probably is not one answer, but a lot of interpretations of policies, etc.  However, one clear effect was the huge military build up that sparked some industry in the US.  Whether this was good or bad for the economy in the eighties is up to interpretation.  It certainly slowed the growth of new, inventive economic strategies and policies.
338847
Easy. Comparative Advantage. It's all about technology and manufacturing. America is not the manufacturing powerhouse it was before the World War II. It just does not have the capabilities to match the Japanese anymore. We have molded ourselves into a more services-based economy, which is good for America in general, but bad for automobile companies like GE.
472249
You could make a very good argument for steam engines. Steam engines essentially created the logistics part of business, and made it possible for food to be distributed all over the country. Steam locomotives created a boom in coal and steel industries and made available a less expensive faster mode of travel for people.
826920
There could be many reasons, each unique to the government and the locality.\n\nThe government might want to stimulate overall business growth by "seeding" particular industries.  Look at "silicon valleys" and all the other nearby businesses that start up when they do.\n\nThe government might be responding to demands by a particular industry.\n\nThe government might be interested in urban renewal of a particular area, and is encouraging this by giving a financial incentive to businesses to locate there.
351812
construction is always advantageous - economy picks up cause industries from labor, supplies, etc. all increase because demand rises.
1130780
Throughout the ages there have been events that have shaped the world that we now know. Events such as the Agricultural Revolution, the Reformation, the Renaissance and the French and American revolutions have all played a part each in their own little way in moulding the society we now live in. However no event has had as far reaching consequences for future generations as the Industrial Revolution.\n\nThe topic for discussion in this essay is “The Industrial Revolution was the most significant event in the making of the modern world”. The term “modern world” refers to world we live in today including its politics, social class structure, economies, environment and technologies among many other things.  This essay will outline the impact the Industrial Revolution had on creating the “modern world” and will therefore prove that the “The Industrial Revolution was the most significant event in the making of the modern world.”\n\nThe pre-industrial economy in England was very different to the post-industrial. The English economy was “dominated by fairly primitive agriculture and construction”1 as were most. Peter Mathias (1969) also refers to the fact that “technology in agriculture, industry or transport remained subjected to the interruptions of nature”2. There was an attempt to integrate technology into agriculture but however “frost, flood, gale, or calm the wheels did not turn”3. This led to an inefficient system and low productivity rates and therefore “not much shipping put out of port between October and March”4. The weather also meant that there was “not much work available on the land in bad weather in some of the winter months”5 and “building activity declined in the winter”6.\n\nThis all changed with the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. The exact timeframe of the Industrial Revolution is not known but T.S. Ashton, a historian, author, and former professor of economic history at University of London7 held the term “Industrial Revolution” refers to the period between 1760-18308.  The term “Industrial Revolution” was however not coined until the second half of the 19th century by Friedrich Engels and Louis-Auguste Blanqui9. \n\nThe exact catalyst for the beginning of the Industrial Revolution is contentious and a topic of great debate. The Industrial Revolution was a result of  “many fundamental, interrelated changes that transformed agricultural economies into industrial ones” mainly the nature of production10. It was a period during which England gradually moved from muscle and water power to more efficient mechanised power i.e. steam powered engines.\n\nHowever, the long lasting effects of the Industrial Revolution aren’t just isolated to the industry as its name suggests. The Industrial Revolution also had socioeconomic, cultural and environmental impacts which helped form the world we live in. In fact the Industrial Revolution is considered to be so important in forming the modern world that it is comparable to the Agricultural Revolution in the Fertile Crescent in around 3000 B.C.E11.\n\nSocioeconomic impacts of the Industrial Revolution were far reaching from population growth to social class structure from social control to working and living conditions.  \n\n- That's part of an essay I did for uni That's the industrial revolution. Sorry if it has nbothing to do with the question. I hope it gives a backgound. I was just trying to help. :)
1137422
1. The kiln made china easier to produce.\n2. The glazing process made china safer and more durable.\n3. Mass production made china cheaper and more available.\n4. The application of gold leaf.
619809
1) the North had a bigger population = more soldiers\n2) the North had more factories to make stuff in\n3) the North had more railroads = transportation\n4) the North had more money to spend on the war