One is True, Two is False?
348376
That means one God is true, but two isn't. That there's only one.\n\nBut I don't believe that. :(
316686
the process u follow is correct, but actually it is wrong. fundamentally wat u did is ok, but technically it is wrong. because this becomes a quadratic equation which has more than 1 root. so this equation has more than 1 answers for which it is true.
939638
1)true\n2)false\n3)false\n4)false
436590
They are simply a lot of questions (In tree style) that thier anser are either True or False.\n\nExample\nIf Q1 is true go to Q22\n.\n.\n.\nIf Q4 is true go to Q 17\n.\n.\n.\nIf Q17 is false go to Q299\n.\n.\n.\nIf Q22 is false go to Q4\n\n\nAnd so on
23472
The statement is false.\n\nTo solve this, we use a Venn diagram, like this (go ahead and try this; it's easy and quick):  Draw a circle and label it "Wanks".  Now draw a circle that intersects the Wanks circle, and label it "Cranks".  Now put two dots in the Wanks circle, two dots in the Cranks circle, and two dots in the area where the circles intersect.  Notice that there are four Wanks and four Cranks, and two of them are both Wanks _and_ Cranks.  Now draw a third circle that intersects only the Cranks circle, and label it "Blanks".  Put two dots in the Blanks circle, and put two dots in the area where the Blanks and Cranks circles intersect.  Notice that there are now six Cranks and four Blanks, and two of them are both Cranks _and_ Blanks.\n\nNow use your diagram to test your true/false statement.  It is true that some Wanks are Cranks, and it is true that some Cranks are Blanks; but there are no Wanks that are Blanks.  So the statement is false.
836608
1st one you are right because 2/3 < 4/5 so to the left\n2nd one you are wrong becuase it can be both. if x is positive -x is negative and if x is -ve -x is positive\n\n3rd one you are right
921128
First one is right, you do the power first, the multiply.\n\nThe second isn't right however.
555471
1. False\n2. True\n3. False\n4. Flase\n5. False\n6. False\n7. True\n8. True\n9. Surrender (I believe the word is actually submission)
108279
One is three, one is two.  Three is more advanced, and therefore inherently more complex.\n\n:-p
770029
That's a paradox. If it's false then it's true, but if it's true then it's false.
1155744
Both versions are true.
513990
Question 1 used if three or more things to distinguish. Question 2 used if only 2 things to distinguish
354533
1. True. \n2. True.\n3. True.\n4. False. A parallelogram has no symmetry at all.\n5. True.
388398
i think the false statement is C. as the degree of any number is always 1. i dont understand the statement b tho :S
266936
Counterexample: 1\n\nJay's proof is false because x(x-1) = 0 just says that x could be either 1 or 0 to satisfy that equation. x was 1 in that case. It does not mean that 1=0.\n\nJZ-LP's proof is false because you can't say let 1=0.\n\nBianca is just plain wrong.
86034
neither true or false...
695615
1) No\n2) Yes\n3) No\n4) Yes