is  zero  equals  zero???
338816
As in many other pseudo-demonstrations of this kind, the error is to divide by zero (2-2) both sides of the identity. You can't do this because the division by zero is an undefined operation.\n\nFrom a well-known logic theorem, starting from a false statement, you can consistently derive any other false statement. This is the common source of many apparent paradoxes.
1003229
this is 0 dude...you will get x-x term which is zero and hence entire thing is 0.
1185063
(0! +0! + 0! +0! +0!)!
469511
To quote dilbert: "Early Civilisations never had a concept of zero" (hey, you wanted it thorough right?) And they started the number system at one. .... Hmm, pretty much the panel cuts out... \nRemember, the ones and zeros are really the positive and negative polaritys on a magnetic disk. That is the key to your computer informations. Do not take a magnet to your computer.
770945
lol anything to the power of 0 is equal to 1\nso the answer should be\n-1 / c
66821
You can't divide anything by zero, so the answer mathematicians give is that 1/0 is "undefined". \n\nIt is very tempting to think that 1/0 = infinity but there is a consequence...\n\nIf 1/0 = infinity, and 0 times infinity = 1, then what is 2/0? Infinity? \n\nIf we say "yes", then we have to say that 0 times infinity = 1 AND also = 2 (and by implication also 3, 4, 5...). \n\nBut remember that anything times 0 is 0. It only takes the simplest of arithmetic to imagine an empty apple box, and to say "you can ask me for as many as you like - even infinity - but I can only give you zero apples"
501645
I too failed math but to me this is a logic question:\n0+0=0\nWhat else cloud it be?
814311
The issue lies in the fact that the original equation is 0=0.\n\nThen, if you put in any value for x, you are dividing by 0 which as we all know, is a "no no."
810128
Neither.\n0/0 is indeterminate, or undefined.
449990
Think about the number bar... if you start at 'n' and then move 0 distance from it toward the left, you are still at 'n'.\n\nFor 0-n, you would start at 0, and move 'n' distance toward the left, so 0-n = -n ... the only case where 0-n=n, is when n=0.
692848
bcoz 0 is the additive identity and any number multipled by 0 gives 0.So operations using 0 are simpler and life becomes much more easier.
161780
There is a simple mistake in your logic.\nYou want to say you will add x , x times. As you want to add it x time you are making it constant.( Because when you are diffrentiating, x can't change)\nwhen you diffrentiating const, all will be 0.\nso you have proved 0=0.
895454
There is no ordered pair {a,b} which solves both equations\n\nif a+b = a-b , then 2b = 0 or b = 0 and a is anything\n\nBut the second equation is not defined for b=0, no matter what a is (specifically, a/b is not defined for b=0)
999313
0^n = 0, where n is not equal to zero\nn^0 = 1, where n is not equal to zero\n0^0 = undefined. why?\n\nExpress the exponent 0 into n - n (n is not equal to zero)\n0^0\n= 0^(n - n)\n\nUse the property b^(x + y) = b^x · b^y\n= 0^n · 0^-n\n\nUse the properties 0^n = 1 and b^-x = 1/b^x\n= 1 · 1/0^n\n= 1/0\n= undefined\n\n^_^
1137788
Nope, 0/0 could be 1 but it could also be anything else.   Division is the opposite of multiplication and 0 times anything at all, even infinity, is still zero.
802753
"Division by Zero in mathematics is undefined because no definite meaning can be attached to this operation. To understand this, notice that a/0=b must (if it means anything) mean the same as a=0•b.\nHowever, if a≠0 then a=0•b is not true for any b; and if a=0 then a=0 is true for every b. This tells us that a/0 cannot be assigned a definite value- and therefore has no meaning."    --George Simmons
45380
its simple ... 80*70*60 ... 10*0 = 0 !!\n\nright isnt it ??? :D