isnt discovery channel's myth buster cool or what?
342743
Good show, they do all the stuff i wish I could discover on my own.
363506
MythBusters .......... my kind of people!!!
756660
I was just about that ask what this is doing under "science" since I just noticed this category. It really should be under mythology or religion because it is more similar to that than anything else.\n\nThere was a South Park episode a few weeks ago, about how "9/11 conspiracy theories" were a conspiracy themselves because 25% of the population is retarded and needs to believe in ridiculous conspiracies. No offense to the mentally challenged. But it does seem like a lot of people out there need to believe in Loch Ness monster, Roswell UFOs, etc.
375080
No, and there are information lines that can answer questions so you dont get myths like that.
331169
Yes! I think so! Because I watched Myth Busters too!
742105
yes. its  lame series. did they ever make a decent one? all the ones i've seen were always cheesey not every fun to watch and usually had me changing the channel after 30 mins of watching it.
234327
No, it is a myth.  But, it's a cool idea.  I'm sure someone will pick it up, write a book about it and make lots of money making people believe it.
36884
The level of weirdness depends on where it's being installed.... like where in your body, then yes it is very weird.... unless you get the premium channels then it is ok......... unless they are reruns of shows you've never seen, like freaky deja vu, then yes, that is really weird
385629
Didn't Mythbusters confirm that one?
1096692
It'th a myth-tery, thilly!
231462
Mythbusters and Dirty Jobs. The hosts are rather amusing and you can actually learn a thing or two.\n\nPlus, how cool is it to get paid to blow stuff up!
672165
No, Dinosaurs are not a myth.  We have thousands of specimens of fossilized dinosaur remains that indicate that these were indeed real creatures that once lived on our planet.\n\nI have no idea what a "Dimo" is, so I can't answer whether or not the 'Anatomy and Physiology of the Dimo' supports the existence of Dinosaurs, however the anatomy and physiology of archosaurs, avians, and the dinosaurs themselves certainly supports their existence.\n\nThe bone of an animal does not out weigh the flesh.  The skeleton of a 150 pound man would only weigh 10 to 15 pounds.  That comes out to at most about 10% of the weight of the flesh.\n\nWhy wouldn't the creator make carnivores before man?  The bible even says he created the animals before he created man.  Even if you believe the flawed, illogical sequence of creation put forth in the biblical account, there's no reason not to believe that dinosaurs could exist.\n\n'What flood?'  Exactly!  What flood?  There is absolutely no geological evidence that there has ever been a global, total flood that covered the entire Earth in water.  Even if there were, it has nothing to do with the existence or not of dinosaurs.\n\nDinosaurs did not kill themselves off.  The hypothesis with the widest general acceptance in the scientific community is that a massive impact with a meteor or comet at the end of the Cretaceous in conjunction with other stressors brought about the extinction of the dinosaurs.  Certainly no one has ever suggested that the dinosaurs somehow deliberately caused the meteor to crash.\n\nWhat doesn't look natural about their construction in the various re-constructions you have seen?  I have seen some that look very good, and others that look like cheap Hollywood effects (mostly because they are).  I've also seen cartoons where people are depicted with yellow skin, giant bug eyes and three fingers.  That doesn't mean that people don't exist, just that the depiction is not very accurate.  Critters like three-toed sloth, pangolins, sea cucumbers and walking sticks don't look 'natural' either, and yet they do indeed exist.  Just because a creature doesn't meet your expectations of beauty or conform to your notion of what a proper animal looks like doesn't mean they are mythical.\n\nNo one has to lie to get people to 'believe' in evolution.  People who actually look at things like physical evidence and scientific experimentation without jumping to pre-drawn conclusions based on religious dogma are almost invariably convinced of the validity of evolutionary theory.  The only lies are spread by those who refuse to accept evidence that they erroneously believe attacks their religious beliefs.\n\nMan doesn't come directly from a fish.  If you look at the morphological and anatomical similarities between a Sarcopterygian fish and an early amphibian, between an amphibian and a reptile, between a synapsid reptile and an early mammal, between an early mammal and an insectivore, between an insectivore and a prosimian lemur, between a lemur and a monkey, between a monkey and an ape, between an ape and an early hominid, between the hominid and Homo erectus and between Homo erectus and Homo sapiens sapiens, you too will see the constant, slow and gradual development of some characters and the conservative retention of other characters that indicates a long and gradual evolutionary process from fish to man.\n\nThe Big Bang theory is a whole 'nother topic, even bigger, you might want to post another question about that.  It too has little to do with the reality of dinosaur existence.\n\nMaybe the book "Jarasic Park" talks about the "myth of Dinosaurus", but the novel "Jurassic Park" by Michael Crichton which was made into a series of increasingly bad films certainly does not.
986206
haha. Taking my advice huh? Well heres the url: http://dsc.discovery.com/fansites/mythbusters/talk/talk.html
1178497
Not only a myth, but a really, really dumb one....
267786
That video was absolutely ridiculous and only shows how ignorant of the facts the producers are. If you're foolish enough to believe the lies of this propaganda then so be it.\n\n(I know mykonthc obviously would disagree with me so I don't expect the 10 points just for that fact.)
109418
Anything on the Discovery Channel
70961
It's not so much a myth as a phenomenon.  Planes and ships have been known to disappear in it.  One theory is that there is some kind of electromagnetic anomaly that screws up compasses.