If libs are REALLY pro choice?
346177
Hear Hear.\n\nIt surprises me how ignorant people are. Here you are, saying that you want to choose to send your kid to a private school. Another poster decides that yes, you should be able to do that, but "it is wrong to take money out of the public school system." Hmmm....your tax dollars pay for the public schools, if you want to send your kid to private school, you're free to do so, but you still have to pay for other kids to go to public school? Does that make sense to you?\n\nI agree with you. Tax me less, and I'll make the decision with the LARGER disposable income I have, as to which school my kid goes to.
1114666
Here's a few good questions from your side of the aisle:\n\n To be a LIBTARD do you "have to" believe that saving criminals is more important than saving the unborn?\n\n How many babies do you have to abort before you can become a LIBERAL?\n\n  If I neutered my dog would it automatically make him a LIBTARD?\n\n As a LIBTARD is it "cooler" to give condoms to children or clean needles to crack whores?\n\n As a LIBTARD, would your head EXPLODE if you accidentally walked into a church where someone said "Jesus"?\n\n As a LIBTARD, is having multiple abortions the equivalent of making Eagle Scout?\n\n As a LIBTARD, is it mandatory that attend QUEER WEDDINGS?\n\nIf this is the kind of person on the Right, I'm happy to be as far away from that as I can get...
714577
I would think that Mitt Romney is Pro-life.  Or maybe he is like me, Pro-life, and Pro Choice.  Let me explain my Pro-choice, though,.  I believe that every woman in Ameica has choices, alot of choices, Depo- Nuva Ring, The patch, ortho-trycyclien, other pills, Norplant, etcc.  There is also the choice to have your tubes tied. If none of the above work, since when does the woman have to keep the baby, she could always give it up for adoption.   And then there is the Most Effective Choice of all- ABSTINENCE.  You don't want a baby, Don't have sex.  Murder should never be considered a viable choice, since there are many other choices available to women.
875169
That's the main confusion most "pro life" people make. Being pro-choice does not mean that I am pro-abortion. It means I am for the rights of the people. Nobody is for abortion. Nobody wants it to happen. The facts are though, if you allow the government to strip you of your rights, no matter what they are, you will never get them back. And it makes it easier for them to take away more and more rights. I am pro-choice because the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution gives a woman the right to decide what she will and will not do with her body, and I am pro-constitution, and pro-peoples rights, and pro-choice. Besides, no matter how you feel, in the end it's none of your business what a woman does choose to do with her body. If if offends you, then don't do it. If you choose to teach this to your children, right on. But if you want to take away more of my rights, then you can stick it up your............
1155539
in the "church of liberalism"...abortion is just..."aww ca mon honey...don't use a condom,...i'll just get an abortion"
171855
Very good question.  Ask Scott Peterson (worthless piece of garbage) about that one.  This is just one hole in the beliefs of the right to choose people that they wish we wouldn't see.  The fact is that a fetus IS a human life and abortion IS murder.\n\nAnother scenario that escapes me is that you will see the same people at a "Fur Is Murder" rally as you will see at a "Freedom of Choice" rally.  I wonder if they see the irony of their actions?
657052
menifeedave..."queers and baby killers"???  so you are saying that all liberals and/or democrats are queers and baby killers, right?  i just need some conformation on your answer!
908718
Good question.  They say they're pro life but then again they're pro death.... seems two faced to me...
730110
Actually, this is one of the oldest arguments they use to support abortion. They think kids are better off dead than imperfect.
260318
Well, I consider myself a libertarian and I am Pro-life. If the girl who implied that being a Pro-life libertarian was being less than a full libertarian knew what she was talking about, she'd know that there is no consensus among libertarians or the Libertarian party about abortion except this: no government funds should  ever be used for any abortions.\n\nMost libertarians believe that one area the government should interfer with is when one person interfers with the life of another. Sounds like abortion to me.
760968
Evidently a lot of people have chosen abortions because Bush is in office. After all neither statistics not Libs ever lie, do they?\n\nI've always wondered just how many abortions Clinton has had to pay for.
55824
oppose death penat;y + abortian, but i'm liberal
914904
pro choice!\nits your decision not anyone else.
466036
yes, liberals are full of crap...\n\nIm kidding...no, but seriously they are.
501716
I think you will find that most pro-abortion advocates are actually not in favor of late-term abortions.  Perhaps they should play the, "don't lump us in with your misconceptions" card on you.
1178463
You really are in a pickle. On one level your position seems at least consistent. Its ironic that most gun voters consider themselves pro life. I guess its all in how you look at it. Here is a link with some information that might help. Can you imagine the trouble those that are for legalizing drugs and are pro life have?
705476
To help someone in a time of need is a lot different than the liberal point of view.\n The liberal plan does not encourage the recipient to stop taking "charity",but to keep on taking it. That is why we have generation after generation on welfare.\n Abortions are going to happen,either naturally or medically. I think both sides of the issue should sit down to work out some sort of compromise to allow medical abortions for legitimate reasons,not on demand.\n  A woman who needs an abortion should be able to get one that is safe and would allow her to have children later if circumstances allow it.