Which is worse, fighting terrorism on a global scale, or selling nuke secrets to the Chinese?
338514
People love Clinton because of the fake e-economy of the mid 90's. People forget that it collasped and left California in ruin and led to the accounting practices that Bush had to deal with.\n\nMost people believe what they read in major papers and see on TV so they are ignorant and don't realize the agenda's involve. The dem base are poor and uneducated people and they play up themes to get votes and keep people down.
240368
I think that China is defending back its self now. The US has alwasys used such reports to manipulate other countries and force them to comply with its interests. Now China is no longer playing behind the scenes. I think the US will reconsider issuing these kinds of reports in the future because now the truth has been uncovered.  Democracy is not about eating hamburger and watching hundereds of T.V. channels. If you remember, a lot of fabrication went on in Bush's first period elections!!
673686
It depends on the motivation.  If one is motivated by greed, power and global Americanization, I'd say yes.  If one is motivated by peace, justice or focusing anti-terrorism in the proper direction, I'd say no.
1020708
Terrorism is not up here.In my logic that says we were right the rest of the world was wrong.And also in my logic you should kill the guilty not the Innocent.\nWhy is liberal logic just the opposite?\nAs to selling peace,we were, they just didn't buy .You can't feed a tiger carrots.
599032
Yes. China and North Korea both have huge work camps for political prisoners.\n\n\npeace
472624
I think it is worse than that. Look for any action or decision from those who gouvern and you'll find a profit motive.
316345
The Chinese are becoming a big threat to us militarily, economically and technoligically speaking. I just read in the news that the US Gov't gave the highest number of visas to China...Why? To get on their good side of course! The Chinese gov't has been building their military up big prompting the US to also spend more on defence. We are making new jet fighters and destroyers. Once again, we may find ourselves in an arms race like with Russia in the 80's.
821138
Find something or somebody in Washington DC that is/was non-political, if he was given a directive and did what he was told then that is all that matters. People in the intelligence agencies or security committees leaking information to the press is for political gain is not  "conscientous", it's treason.  The Contras were percieved as a greater threat than the Iranians, and the Soviet influence in the Middle East a greater threat than militant Islam. Now Ortega has come back into power, the Russians and China aiding, arming and encouraging Iran, Syria and North Korea. The situation has decayed into further chaos, but he's familiar with all the players.
1167834
Both the Cold War and the War on Terror are open-ended wars with no clear enemy.  This allows the U.S. Government to use it to go against elements it deems dangerous...all it had to do back in the 50s was label those elements "communists"...now it labels them "terrorists"
248685
To the U.S.A of course they think that China is a threat because Americans dun wanna get robbed of their leading position in military, economics and technology in terms of world standard.\nIn my opinion it will be worse than USA in the sense that it will be less involved in world's politics. For instance poking into other countries business. Then we wouldn't have a WORLD LEADER to lead the world in the so called(right way).You may think that its not good to poke into other people's business but the fact that is that someone must lead the world just like how the father decides in a family otherwise the world will be even more disorganised. Again then China will then be a threat to not only the USA , but also to the WORLD.
247514
The biggest one is BUSH borrowing funds from Communists to add to our national debt. China is Communist, and that would have been treason several years ago, well not so many years ago, with Regan or even Clinton.
690904
Americans in the quest to become the global police force they have created many enemies and they are labeling all those opposing them as terrorist nation.Due to actions of the Americans global terrorism is on the rise and it has nothing to do with communism.The biggest breeding ground for terrorist is Pakistan,where many terrorist organizations operate,and their Government can't do anything about it.No country in this world support or \nencourage terrorism,the problem is due to the actions of Americans and its allies more and more people are becoming terrorists.African continent is the biggest breeding ground for terrorism,Due to poverty in many countries,which the terrorist take advantage
1030569
The myth is the Israeli diplomatic corp.  It depends on what you would call intelligence.  Electronic eavesdropping/weather reports/fog of war/code breaking and the like would probably belong to the NSA.  For human intelligence it would actually be the Chinese.  They seem to easily find people that would betray their country and the FBI is full of Chinese moles.  The KGB was also a master of human intelligence.
949255
The death yesterday of a former Russian secret service agent in London is a matter for the police and related agencies. I would not wish to pre-judge its cause or who was responsible. \n\nThe implications of the availability of poisonous, highly radioactive, materials are frightening. Individual assassinations are only one sort of resulting threat.\n\nWithout going into specifics, the lack of control of radioactive material after the collapse of the Soviet Union was a matter for great worldwide concern. Nuclear proliferation leads to several very serious concerns about the availability of radioactive material to terrorists from sources in more than one country.\n\nBefore people get ideas into their heads about the sale of radioactive materials, can I point out that these are very nasty stuff? Unscrupulous people selling them are unlikely to be fussy about health and safety issues and those buying them are likely to poison themselves, quite apart from receiving large doses of radiation. Not a good idea at all.
513004
that they were going to bomb china
1144258
The families and relatives of the terrorists would have been slaughtered in horrible raids, and many innocents would have been killed as collateral damage. No one would have questioned China's motives or tactics because, after all, freedom of speech is not a right of the people there. And Chinese leaders do not tolerate criticism too well. \n\nChina may have also seized the opportunity to topple Saddam and seized the oil fields. Their economy is starving for energy. Here is Saddam, there is the oil ... all we need is a bit of an excuse and there he goes and here we go. Michael Moore and others project this motive on the US for going into Iraq. If we really went in there to seize the oil, why can't we get any? Oil prices have surged in the last couple of years, primarily due to China's growing appetite for energy.\n\nI'm not sure China could have taken out Saddam on their own. So maybe that is the only reason they opposed the US for doing it. They wanted the oil for themselves.
758738
Ha ha, China has over a billion people, and nuclear weapons, i don't think there is any chance that you could convince congress that that would be a worthwhile cause