When did gossip mags decide to start combining Celebrity couple names as a gimmick?
267605
The whole fad started when some dead-souled celebrity magazine writer stopped doing blow in the bathroom long enough to coin the name "Brangelina." Celebrity gossip writers are herd animals by nature and soon *every* couple was seeing their names butchered and mashed into some syrupy-cute concatenation. It's idiotic, it's annoying, and if I ever find out who's responsible for starting the "baby bump" phrase I will punch that person's heart straight through their chest.
445506
They changed their name around 1993-1994.\n\nhttp://www.lifeinitaly.com/fashion/gucci.asp
965482
None of them shock me. With celebrities you kind of expect that from them. Kind of like the flavor of the month. I am more surprised to see celebrity couples that have been together more than five years.
813912
I prefer Andy & Leah.  It just rolls of the tongue easier.  While I am not a traditionalist, I tend to put the man's name first when talking about a couple.
767760
THANK YOU!!!! I'm glad I aint the only one that thinks so,now it sounds like a jumbly hot mess!!!They need to make a COMPLETELY new entrance for the two of them instead of this AWFUL combination!
123112
celebrity cards are for celebrities
861035
Many people have asked Tyra why they don't have an "America's Next Top Male Model", and so she did a mini one on her show, "Tyra". \n\nThat might be what you found, it was all done in an hour, so it wasn't to serious, but If I remember correctly, they got a spread in a magazine.
781691
No...though there was the whole "are they dating or not?" scenario going on in the late 80s early 90s. It wasn't helped by them releasing the duet Especially For You, which played up to the whole notion of them being an item. \n\nObviously their characters married in neighbours - Scott and Charlene's wedding is a and always will be a classic Neighbours moment
889983
it was a publicity stunt back in the early days..it was for some magazine/newspaper article or something like that..it kind of just stuck around since then..we love it :)
297730
Victoria Adams (Posh Spice) David Beckham, July 4, 1999\nBrooke Shields and Andre Agassi,April 19, 1997,\nJennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt, July 29, 2000\nChristina Applegate and Johnathon Schaech,October 20, 2001\nCourteney Cox and David Arquette,June 12, 1999\n David Boreanaz and Jaime BergmanNovember 24, 2001\nSarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick,May 19,1997 \nKate Hudson and Chris Robinson New Year's Eve, 2000\nMichael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley May 26, 1994\nAngelina Jolie and Billy Bob Thornton May 5, 2000\nWill Smith and Jada Pinkett December 31, 1997\nBarbra Streisand and James Brolin July 1, 1998
662880
According to the wire reports YES! Rory gave the story to a London tabloid called News of the World & it took-off from there. I think Rory & Liz were in on it together. Every story about Dame Elizabeth has Rory's name it.
1103795
ok mag!!\n\nthe one with victoria beckham on it just in case i run out of toilet paper
1098911
I think a lot of people are curious about EVERYBODY'S everyday lives and enjoy gossip about anyone. Tabloids, magazines, and interviews with celebrities ensure that there's a lot of information about celebrities out there. I have a feeling most people would read tabloids about their next-door neighbors if their neighbors had paparazzi following their every move. :)
811364
No. They made A Cinderella Story together. Chad was either engaged or married to Sophia Bush, and Hilary was dating that guy from Good Charlotte.
416661
I hope so because Simple Life wont be fun if they're not causing trouble together. They won't be able to sing sona sas w.e its called to each other. Paris Hilton's mom said Paris misses Nicole awww<3
51868
US is more tabloid. People is not bad, if you want a magazine which would be more true I would suggest OK magazine, it has been approved by many celebrities.\n\nCheck this out:\n\nhttp://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2005-06-26-media-mix_x.htm
665009
I think one reason that celebrity marriages break up so quickly is because of each celebrity being catered to and babied.  A celebrity doesn't have to censor him/herself around his/her staff, so they can let all the negativity and immaturity fly.  A celebrity doesn't have to make any compromises.  A celebrity gets his/her way, period.  If you get two selfish, self-centered people like that together, they won't be able to stand each other for very long.