what is going to be pakistan's future.?
340094
i see great unrest, followed by breif periods of peace and goodwill
778940
Events that we think will happen in the future?
429585
Im writing this more as a response to nawab's answere because its pretty clear that paksitan's being spared because of strategic reasons in the subcontinent region. as far nawb's answere is concerned and his reference to pakistan having a "big" stake in the fight against terrorism and that pakis dying and the casualty number being more than 9/11 victims and also the highlight being and which forced me to post this answere that pakistan's "strategy" winning the war agaist U.S.S.R. Im glad that he pointed out the fact that the US supplied money and weapons for the war against soviet union, however american military and the american intelligence is n was not stupid enough to tell pakistan that "ok guys here's the dow n here's the hardware, go and kick ass we know u can do it on ur own while we sit at pentagon n watch the video game". cmon give urself a break and come back to reality for gawd's sake dude, pakistan couldn't even win a war against india and paki military was not even half of what its right now then (not that its any better now) and you think the US IS GONNA THROW ALL THAT MONEY AND military resources on a country like that and depend on its strategies? yeah rt? The war was majorly won because of the afghan terrain and the afghan mujahideen guirellas and also things were not going great at home for the reds and the deterioration of soviet union had started by then. tye strategies were completely provided by the US military ad to an extent the afgahn mujahideen AND NOT BY THE PAKI MILITARY (maybe there were jobless pakis fighting the war just like they are doing right now by joinign different terrorist organisations). The problems that pakistan faces today and why it has to pump in so much of itys own resources in fighting the terrorist is becoz of it s own "policies and stragies" that it followed, which was supporting taliban and other hard core terrorist groups and also turnign a blind eye to their recruitment and other unacceptable activities because pakistan wanted to get abck at india for helping bangladesh break away by cultivating terrorsit camps. entire world knows that in paki mosques  on fridays there are people collecting and donating money openly and freely in the name of islam which is used for terrorist activites. so pakistan is not the victim here its the perpetrator. its the paki guy who was the master mind behind 9/11 and the london bombers were trained in pakistan and also the 7 terrorist caught in london recently were alos trained in apkistan which they admitted. yes there are good people in pakistan but majority of them hate US and the wesatern world(no one knows for sure why the master mind of 9/11 who is a paki palnned it in the fiors place, he had no good reason to do that). they hate the same world were they immigrate to and crawl to all the nook and corners of new york or london or sydney abd then support terrorism from tere. pakistan is a country which is created by spiulling blood and it will get washed away in blood in its own blood. god bless america!!
442419
i think he is a right person, in his leadership pakistan is making progress faster then any other country in the region. the economy growth rate is highest in the history of pakistan.
95628
PAKISTAN HAS A BIG BIG IMPORTANCE IN THE WORLD MAP.........I WOULD LIKE to know that what importance do you have in the world? wash your tongue before speaking anything bad about pakistan! huh
968181
why would you want 2 Go there now, With whats happening in those country's including Pakistan.  Some people love 2 put themselves in harms way.  And then wants the world 2 rescues them. CRAZY
392048
He is the best option for that country at this time. The House of Saud is horrible, but who could take their place and be open to dealing with the free and civilized world?\n\nMusharraf has done everything we needed him to do, but not even he has complete control over all elements in his government.  He's really had to do some work with his secret police, the IIS as that they were essentially protecting Bin Laden and it has been infiltrated by Jihadists, of which he is certainly not. \n\nthe following was a free post from Stratfor.com\n\nGeopolitical Diary: The United States, Pakistan and Musharraf\nApril 07, 2006 03 56  GMT\n\nU.S. Assistant Secretary of State Richard Boucher has said the United States wants the Pakistani military to come under the control of a civilian leadership, a Pakistani daily reported on Thursday. This statement is a dramatic turn of events, especially considering the history of U.S-Pakistani relations since the 9/11 attacks. \n\nIslamabad's unique position as the second home of al Qaeda -- coupled with a perception that President Gen. Pervez Musharraf alone could prevent the country from falling into the hands of radical Islamists -- kept the Bush administration from assuming a tough position against the Musharraf administration, even though Islamabad's cooperation against al Qaeda, from the U.S. point of view, has remained subpar. Perhaps even more significantly, the Bush administration has chosen to overlook the fact that the world's only nuclear-armed Muslim state is ruled by a military leader, even amid its wider push for democracy in the Muslim world. \n\nNow, however, it appears that the United States wants to correct not only the political aberration that has allowed Musharraf to hold two offices -- the presidency and military chief of staff -- simultaneously, but also that there is a concern about the political role of Pakistan's military establishment. Put differently, as the internal pressures against Musharraf mount, Washington is working toward a political order in Islamabad that can help to contain the instability stemming from the imbalance in civil-military relations.\n\nThe Musharraf regime always knew that at some point in the war against the jihadists, the United States' focus on Pakistan would degrade from the level of strategic interest to tactical concerns. The Bush administration, it appears, has just begun to take stock of the notion that Musharraf's indispensability is a myth -- thus, Washington's shifting posture toward both the Musharraf regime and Pakistan itself. \n\nThe key to understanding this situation is the fact that the focal point in the U.S.-jihadist war no longer is South Asia, but is now the Middle East. Capturing jihadist leaders such as Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri and Mullah Mohammed Omar remains a priority for the Bush administration, but as time goes by it has become clear that the jihadists' strength has been reduced -- to the point that al Qaeda now seems to be, at best, a regional player, and largely unable to carry out meaningful attacks, even on its own turf. \n\nSo, then, how does Pakistan figure into the U.S. geopolitical calculus now? The Bush administration is realizing that rocking the Pakistani boat will not lead to instability of unbearable proportions. After all, political instability has been a defining characteristic of Pakistan since its founding, but the state has not collapsed. More importantly, radical Islamists -- hype notwithstanding -- lack the means to seize control of the government. \n\nPakistan has been ruled by the military on and off for half of its nearly 60 years in existence. During the other half of its history, there have been as many as 17 different civilian administrations. One military dictator was forced out of office by mass demonstrations in 1969, while the second had to leave office after the 1971 territorial division that created what is now known as Bangladesh. The third was
610221
pakistan will crumble underneath the eurasian plates
213218
America is clearly seeing its own interests and is supporting a country who will be able to help them in future. And clearly  this country is india and not pakistan since india is stronger economically, technologically, militarily and is becoming an important global player. This has nothing to to do with peace in the Indian subcontinent or with ethics.
151287
i think india will be able to defeat pakistan. best of luck india............
604193
so many questions...\n\nfirstly a suggestion.(for your own benefit) please don't put abusive statements (like you have done)or someone will report you for abuse..\n\ndon't worry i haven't..\n\nnow your answers...India has a future, a bright one. but yes there are hinderances (i sound like an astrologer. hee.hee..). it may sound cliched but yes corruption and poverty need to be removed at any cost. we need to unite and rise above caste based politics..\nit might win the fifa world cup. but definitely not in the near future. because india has a long way to go as far as football is concerned and due attention has to be given to this sport. the value of rupee will surely rise as the position of india in the world economy is becoming stronger.. \nNO PAKISTAN DOESN'T SUCK..\n( I AM AN INDIAN)\nits just the terrorists and the fundamentalists there who suck..(same applies for india).\nIndia is already on the path of becoming a super power\nINDIA ROCKS AND I LIKE BOLLYWOOD..\n\nAND YES.. I AM MAD..JUST LIKE YOU
1067910
Why do you complain about Pakistans terror attachments. You must be aware that India initially sponsored LTTE whcih is now the worlds most efficient terrorist groups. Welcome to national self-interest
230619
right now pakistan aren't competitive but just wait till their  champion U19 team breaks into the adult team..Bowling needs help too
97563
I believe the state of Israel has a bright future.  All they have to do is great rid of the Palestinians (aka Terrorist)\n\nAnd im also a proud Zionist!!!!
1100363
Australia or Pakistan
246694
Nobody knows the future...\nI can only hope that things will get better for the Cubians after Fidel passes on.
885855
Pakistan has a long way to go to upset history. Personally if that happened, they had a superpower like the US to help them pull that off.\n\nDon't see the US   doing that, period!\n\nPeople who can lie, cheat, and kill to try to move ahead don't do very well at the end of any matter.\n\njust an observation