will nepal be a republican country ?
346941
Nepal's got some problems, they got Maoist revolutionaries knocking down the front door, and a monarchy that needs to leave by the back door , so democracy can form. Am very surprised the US is just idly watching this. We're on the verge of losing Nepal to China.It wouldn't take as much to form a democracy there, as say Afghanistan, If we could just get the monarchy to listen, and let us or India, anyone really,{except China} put in a few thousand troops for stability.
112638
Nepalese rebellions have been on-going for several years now, because the king of Nepal has taken an autocratic role not allowing full democracy for his people. The Kingdom of Nepal is going through conflictive and difficult political and social unrest, that will be overcome as democratic principles are established countrywide.
754617
No.  The nation is divided into parts.  All those parts will never get along with all the other parts so long as religion and politics are intertwined together, which I think will be always.  Look at India...they had Hindus, Muslims, and Sikks.  They were divided along the lines of religion and politics.  They will always be at odds with each other until these two things become separate or one.
534745
Absolutely not.\n\nHalf of it is in Nepal, the other half in Tibet, which is occupied by China.
678261
Well I don't think that the king has been "pushed into a corner". I think he deserved it, rather. Forms of govt. in the world are changing throughout the world and it was wrong on the king's part too to follow an arbitrary policy.The country could have had progress had the king given it a chance to do so.\n    On the other hand the present Govt. has not exactly done the right thing by forming a party with the Maoists. It will be difficult for Nepal to progress under them
1100815
I think by 2075 , 95% of all nations will be democracies of some kind. even China. Democracies do not fight democracies and are more safe to live in
661768
NO? It's usually Democrat or Republican and occasion Independent.  \n\nBut it would be nice to destroy the Republican Party.
748114
yes as long as it is a good constitution that involves giving home rule to all states in the union including the suppressed states eg Catalonia and also including all of the former soviet union.\nit will require a dictatorial government in the Early years to hold the country together
851735
yes you are right. party less democracy is to come. people elect their candidates who are honest, patriotic and progressive and do not have vested interests. this party less democracy was already advocated by M.N. ROY and JAYAPRAKASH NARAYAN of India.political parties do not allow their members to think rationally. for example, if a republican personally is in favor of  with drawl of troupes from Iraq, he can not defy his party's policy. in the same way if a democrat does not like same sex marriages, he can not continue in that party.
116795
Bolivia is a Democratic and Catholic Republic
1143170
No, it's still a represenative republic with a great deal of seperation between church and state. Sometimes it's just hard to tell.
1095269
Yes and if there were more men like Teddy Roosevelt I would be Republican. During his term Roosevelt aquired more federal land for National Parks and Monuments then any president in history. He is the sole reason for Yellow Stone National Park. The true conservative is a wonderful person, in my eyes. They place a high value on schooling and the national budget. What we have now, and for a long time, is the party of the Neo Con(victs). It has been around since Nixon and will continue to be that way until we as Americans demand more from our elected officals.
335451
Listen .. here's a fact for u : \nINDIA HAS NEVER ATTACKED OR TRIED TO TAKEOVER ANOTHER COUNTRY IN IT"S ENTIRE HISTORY and would never do so..pls rewind thro the history textbooks. \n\nShe has only defended herself from attacks. \n\nThe view that the Ministry for External Affairs is not entirely in support of the monarchy. It's a fact.\n\nBut that doesnot mean that India would want to takeover Nepal. It respects and acknowledges the state of Nepal. \n\nBut the present tensions REQUIRE INDIA TO ACT DIPLOMATICALLY. And , by diplomatically i mean , talks or something like that, and NOT an invasion.\n\nWhy India HAS TO ACT , is because , Nepal is India's close neighbor . And if the neighbors have such a bloody bad problem , India cant just sit and ignore it, pretending as if there is no problem at all.\n\nWell.. the Indian MEA (ministry of external.. ) is already in a fix esp. after the Iranian vote issue. And so , the next time they take a decision, they are going to ponder over it a hundred times. And , India invading Nepal is simply out of question.\n\nSo. Dont worry.\n\n\nIncase the army is let loose in Nepal , the CPi and BJP will eat Congress' head off.. So, even the political equations DONOT favor an invasion of Nepal!!
332037
sincerely speaking it will never happen but if in case it happens prime minister will be from india off course...capital will be located in india but there will be another capital which will b out of india...i.e. two capitals...as far as the strength is considered off course no nation will dare to look down at us not even USA and this single nation will be able to fuck any other country whenever it wants including fucking USA...
1004503
Hm mm. very interesting point of view.I feel the human race as a whole is closer to the stars than the jungle.However some would like to halt progress in the hopes they can dominate and control the masses.India is one of the more developed cultures in our time with knowledge and reason they dealt with the Taliban destroying 3,000 year old religious shrines.They dealt with the Islamic intrusion in Cashmere region.So I personally feel the odds of India becoming a welcome member of democracy is better than 50/50.Once the seed has been planted it will grow slow at times fast at others but you will never undo it's growth now that it has been tasted it will fight to survive.India's best days are yet to come.I can't say for sure if it is a true democracy however it is trying hard to be one,give it time and it shall be
310509
yes and it will be a republican
886489
Sri Lanka is a secular state and belongs to the people