Why did the govt's report on 911 not mention that bldg 7 was "pulled" the same day but wasn't hit by a jet.
349259
Simple answer -- because it would have raised some uncomfortable questions about what happened to the Twin Towers \nthemselves. Best to keep things tidy, right?
421053
NO!!!!  Go to www.popularmechanics.com and find the article about debunking the 9/11 myths.  And please, please, use your common sense!  Why in the WORLD would the government do something like that?  And HOW?!  It would take YEARS to come up with such an idea, and longer to go through with it.  You should be ashamed of yourself.  Quit watching Loose Change!
794086
So why wasn't he in his multi-million dollar command centre in WTC 7.\nWhy did he allow all the evidence to be shipped away before any investigation could take place - a legal requirement after an air accident.\n\nIt looks like he did a good cover up job.
447447
They are nutters 9/11 did happen. Im just uncertain about some of the fact surrounding the Pentagon (no one seen a plane, no one heard one, no debris, was it a bomb or just a poor excuse for the  the U.S. Government to not shoot the planes down that crashed into the towers? After all they did know the planes where hijacked shortly after take off, and U.S. security is the best in the world... so what happened? Confused consiracy but every thing was so well orcastrated! Thats my opinion. Love Heidi
560411
I have tossed this one back and fourth for some time. I don't think our Government is responsible for the events of 9/11, but there are some holes in the official report. Those holes lead people to believe that this Government is covering things. We may never know in our lifetime what actually happened beyond the obvious, but I am 90% certain that we did not do this to ourselves.
607464
If you don't know . . .\n\nIt happened on Sept. 11, 2001. Three hijacked planes struck the two World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon. A fourth was taken down in a field. Thousands died.
165393
Claim: First is that there was NO plane found at or near the pentagon. \n\nFact: A disintegrated American Airlines Boeing 757-223 (N644AA) was found on the lawn and inside of the Pentagon.\n\nClaim: a janitor in the first tower who heard an explosion in the basement minutes before the plane hit.\n\nFact: Thousands of other people heard and saw the explosion come from over their heads. Video images show Boeing 767’s hitting both of the towers.\n\nClaim: Also, research was done on the flights, and most cross country flights are booked to capacity but those 4 that day (towers, pentagon, flight 93) were all booked to LESS than half capacity, as if they knew what was going to happen.\n\nFact: Load factors for American and United Airlines had been very low on all flights. They were already hemorrhaging money and United eventually went into bankruptcy. American is still losing their shirt. This was competition in action…not predestination.\n\nClaim: The pilots apparently weren't good and I think he said 1 or 2 didn't even have the pilot’s license.\n\nFact: The pilots (I assume you mean the terrorist pilots) had enough training to steer an airliner into a building. You don’t need to be much beyond a private pilot with some internet information available to be able to fly an airliner in a reckless manner into a large target. But you probably couldn’t do it twice.\n\nClaim: The article alluded that the government had a lot to do with (or planned attacks)... ran out of characters :-(\n\nFact: The government’s too big to keep a secret this big. Too many people have big mouths…and coordinating a mass suicide would not be something many people would agree to get involved with.
482653
I think the terrorists planned to use 9/11 because it would indicate that the "day the U.S. called for help." But in my thoughts, I don't think the terrorists got as far as they hope. From historical references, people claimed there were more terrorists but Bush grounded all flights, and the towers held long enough to keep thousands more safe.
220089
There is much lecture in internet about this issue. Here are two sites that show some conclusions.\n\n"Ineffective fireproofing and a shortage of staircases were the main reasons for the collapse of the World Trade Center, according to a report released Tuesday and led by Dr. Shyam Sunder, Acting Deputy Director of the Building and Fire Research Laboratory (BFRL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)."\nhttp://www.indolink.com/displayArticleS.php?id=040805021055\n\nAccording to an analysis by a leading fire-safety expert, had the fire-proofing insulation on the towers' steel structures been thicker, the towers would have survived longer and might even have remained standing after they were hit by the hijacked planes.\nhttp://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3354
380128
People were warned but I do think the city officials should have provided transportation and other means to help evacuate the city. Looks to me like when a disaster strikes or if we have another terrorist attack, it will be ever man for himself. You just can't depend on the government to save lives.
1122004
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html\nhttp://wtc.nist.gov/\nhttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/05/911_documentary_removed/\nhttp://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html\nhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html\n\nNow let's have a second try?  G'head, let's see where you go with it.
419388
I don't know, but it definately doesn't look like anything hit the lawn. There's also no sign of a plane in any of the pictures I have ever seen. However, if a plane didn't hit the pentagon, where did the plane with the passengers go?
44907
The conspiracy theory is ridiculous. There were not any jets to protect us, simply because it was completely unexpected by most people in defense (aka the people in charge) that airliners would be used to attack the US.
427073
I was less than a quarter mile away from the Pentagon and I was looking right at that plane--- normal commercial airliner--- when it went in. I'm usually all about the conspiracy theories but this one is bunk.  I smelled the jet fuel burning and saw the bits of plane fall from the sky along with people's clothes from their exploded luggage.
1120779
This answer is in reply to rliedtky's answer to this question.   Listen.  I dont care how many people you have claiming there was a 757 or a small plane, or a missle...  it DOESNT MATTER.  Eye witness accounts are all going to be different regardless of what actually happened.  It's a version of the truth.\n\nAnd the truth we may never know, but one thing we DO KNOW is .... well it was NOT a 757 like our government said it was.  The eyewitness accounts you speak of (which I have never heard of before) claim the "757" hit its left wing on the ground and then slammed into the pentagon.  Well, this is just simply impossible.\n\nIf the plane's wing broke off while hitting the ground and then hit the building, and this is why we have a 16ft hole in the pentagon, well then, there would be parts of the wreckage ALL over the grass of the pentagon lawn.  In addition, there would be wreckage to be removed from inside the pentagon.  \n\nThe facts???  \n\n-the pentagon video released to us shows NO EXPLOSION until CONTACT with the plane and the building.  Meaning, a PLANE will NOT hit the ground without making a huge fireball.\n\n-lets say the wind DID break off the plane, and the plane STILL did not touch the grass, how was the hole 16ft wide???  The middle of the plane is 24ft wide and 44ft high.  The other wing would of still been attached to the plane and would of had to hit the building SOMEWHERE!\n\n-WHATEVER hit the pentagon went through 3 walls and 9 feet of steel before coming out the other side, in again, a perfect 16ft wide hole.\n\nNOTE:  There was NO wreckage removed from the pentagon.  NO bodies from people on the plane recovered.  AND TO THIS DAY we still have not been able to see what REALLY hit the pentagon.\n\nIf you have a brain rliedtky, instead of questioning my education on this matter,  you should re evaluate your information sir or ma'am.   And until you are able to see what actually hit the pentagon, you will not be able to answer ANY questions except for the fact that is WAS IMPOSSIBLE for a 757 to of done this damage.\n\n\nI personally feel you along with 90% of america will choose to trust in your faithful government over ANYTHING ELSE because the TRUTH is something you will not be able to accept at this point in time.\n\nI am NOT making ANY money from speaking about this topic.  I am doing this because I REALLY CARE and LOVE my country, and I feel we need to re-think our political values on this nation.  Our government had any and EVERY thing to do with 9/11 and people need to know ALL of the facts, not just what mainstream media and the goverment are speaking of.\n\nAfterall, it's impossible for ANYONE to make and educated decision on ANYTHING without knowing ALL OF THE INFORMATION.  \n\nI spend 40-50 hours a WEEK researching this material for my show, and I promise, if i felt it was not SOLID FACTS, I would not report it, NOR would my staff allow me to do so.\n\nThank you for reading,\n\nJoshua Fourrier\nwww.AirAzonaRadio.com\njosh@airazonaradio.com
1174562
The Presidential Daily Breifing one day in late July, I don't know the exact date, stated that the terrorist would fly planes into buildings.  I reckon they did know but chose to ignore what they were told.
1149911
Absolutely absurd. How could the US have helped 9/11? Why would  they? How would no one have come up with any credible evidence after all these years? What reason is there to think that it was not a well-planned attack, run by a large group of Arab terrorists? I think that is the story that fits the evidence.\n\nThey're not addressed in any plausible way. Vast conspiracies don't actually happen or work. Someone always finds out, and yet there's no evidence of this conspiracy.\n\nEdit: Jets did not intercept the planes because they are stationed hundreds of miles from where they were and were not alerted until shortly before the planes crashed. The FAA notified NORAD at 8:40 and planes were scrambled 6 minutes later, 153 miles from the World Trade Center and the first plane crashed at about that time. http://mckinneysucks.blogspot.com/2002_06_01_mckinneysucks_archive.html#77997492\n\nThe buildings fell quickly because they were crashed into by giant airliners. It seems like a building like that should be able to withstand more, but neither you, nor I, nor Ruppert, nor even the engineers who built the towers know what it is like for a plane to crash into a building. The commission report clearly states that the plane struck main support beams and started fires that raged at intense temperatures, further weakining the already weakened supports. Once that happens it doesn't take long for a building to collapse onto itself.\n\nAs for WTC7, the report is clear enough that fires were started on several floors by debris. People say it looks too controlled, but they failr to realize that buildings that tall are made to crumble down and not out. If a main beam buckles, there's no momentum to throw debris out - the force is all down.\n\nHow long it took to form a commission is a question I have myself, but that alone does not make a conspiracy.\n\nAs for explosions, see this: http://www.geocities.com/factsnotfantasy/ExplosivesDebunked.html