If I want an easy and quick development cycle, which provides a better solution?
205731
Quicker?  It depends what you consider quick.  Coldfusion seems easier to learn, especially if you have no OOP experience.  The tags available encapsulate many functions so you do not have to know all the code behind it (>Net does some of this to).  ColdFusion comes with many nice features out-of-the box.  Report generators, Flash forms, graphing capabilities, an email server, and a search engine (all of which you would need to buy separately as COM object with .NET).\n\nThe downside to CF is that it has very limited visibility into the client side machine.  The code is procedural.  While many have tried to develop frameworks that give a pseudo OOP feel they are not the same.  Also, CF was just sold to Adobe.  I don't know if that is good or bad.  Adobe has not said what its plans are with any of the Macromedia tools so there is some question to its future.\n\n.NET is true OOP.  Using C# the developer has access to the entire Windows environment.  This gives you a great deal of control.  Since this is truly OOP, you can encapsulate and reuse your code to your heart's content.\n\nIf you are not familiar with the OOP lifestyle C# or VB.NET can be difficult to grasp.  Also searching COM libraries can take developmental time.  Finding and testing the right object may prolong a project's length, but once you find an object (such as a graphing tool) for one project you will more than likely keep using the same one.
74485
First you need to know what you want the program to do. If you want to keep track of information, you'd be best with a databes. If you want to do stuff in windows, you'd go with VB. \n\nPlease flesh out your needs some more.\n\ngreetz\nGB
25602
For me - the only real differences are the installer and included packages.  You can get any packages and install them if they are not included so they are all essentially equal i suppose.  I prefer slackware though and it is great for development.
463771
Start with RT. Instead of building a complex ticket and help system and trying to integrate it with your site, use a solid and robust package that does what you need and only what you need. I've used RT and Bugzilla quite a bit and both of them are probably your best bet.
260742
The best one to start with would be HTML
274485
Better Buissness bural
60895
I'd try to go a bit simpler than that.  Why don't you hire/interest a screenwriter first.
546359
you need write code !!\n\nuse j2se and develop!!\njar and enjoy !\n\nit is not that easy !!
121567
Smart Draw is good. You can try Borland Together, but it's too heavy. Smart Draw is better.
34322
start fulfilling the easiest task
378414
definitely, PHP. (If you have to choose from these three that is - otherwise, I would have voted for perl). \nWhen you talk about web, and/or text processing, php (or perl) is THE tool for you. Nothing comes close in ease of use, and effectiveness (of both run-time and development). \nSeveral pages of a C++ or java  program are usually translated to 2-3 lines of perl or php.\n... and no, there are no "security issues",  if your server is configured properly. And if it isn't, you've got issues regardless of language. To be viable, security must be provided by the web server, not by application. \n\nYour other choices have their problems.\nJava is cumbersome, ineffective, memory hungry, unstable... to name a few. You'd be really much better off with C++ than java, especially, since you already know it. Java doesn't have any advantages over C++, except for some perceived "simplifications", that are really just functional deficiencies - such as luck of memory management options or multiple inheritance.\n\n.NET... hmmm.... hope, you are not serious. All I can say, stay away from micro-soft stuff as much as you can. It can bring nothing but sorrow.
133234
The only advantage is if you find the software useful and trouble free. And that goes for shareware also. Note: there are a lot of freeware programs that are better than their shareware counterparts.
628556
About 60 % of small businesses see value in creating web sites for marketing and in e-commerce.\n\nSome of the issues facing development are what plat form do i use do i include flash tecnology and what vendor do i use for the e-commerce component.  it has to be user friendly and current at all times which means regular updating,  You must also alow user to give feed back and or have a help feature built in.\n\nThey see this as a very valuable asset to their business as the internet is becoming the fastest growing medium for any business and users are very comfortable in using this medium.
100800
Id go with UML also - especially if its a detailed dynamic site.\n\nMy process is:\n1. Concept (UML)\n2. Pen & Paper wireframes (or wireframes in Photoshop/Fireworks)\n3. Basic colors in wireframes.\n4. Design\n5. Code your CSS\n6. HTML Shell for all pages\n7. Build Database\n8. Tweak HTML, Design and CSS\n9. Add Dynamic code\n10. Tweak\n11. Tweak
617801
I have WMP10 and I think it's easy and simple\nSo i preferWMP10
314385
The difference can be found in the words. Developement is to grow and make more efficient (or better in laymens)\n\nTo manage is to control. You can mix these together for your best business results.\n\nIf you only manage, you likely will never grow, because development is required to create growth and make your business or office do it's best. You learn and grow, manage along the way.  Hope this is helpful.
450589
I've had experience with several different pieces of software; Cubase, Reason, Traktor... but I find Ableton Live to be the most powerful and easiest to use.