a friend of my claims this to be a fact. can someone shed some light on this question?
209571
Do bears crap in the woods? Oh of course, junior! They all do if you rub them the right way!
139147
Don't take the info here as given. Only believe it if you find real nonpartison evidence. I'm not saying it is true or not, I'm just saying before you believe it, know what you are talking about.
479526
Here is another possibility\nhttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AoKH7..RzNsUeBlKjofW8avzy6IX?qid=20061109180430AAjD6kQ
571055
It is really impossible to know for sure, but there are several theories in physics about this.  It could be possible for multiple universes.  It put a link to Wikipedia that is very interesting reading if you are interested in learning more.
243332
Its false. If it is true. It would not have been mysterious.
513371
I had heard that as well, and noticed that it was mentioned in wikipedia articles for both of them. I'm really not sure if it's correct or not, as far as I know it's all rumor and speculation.
213427
It sure seems like it.\nhttp://community.discovery.com/groupee/forums/a/tpc/f/7201946096/m/1451997328
273408
I heard that the story was from east of France, possibly even as far as Russia. It's a very old story. I'm sure that it had some basis in truth.
157906
Yes that is true.\n\nPlease check this link:\n\nhttp://www.nndb.com/people/124/000101818/
71587
Umm....  there is no way to disprove it....thats why its called a law, not a theorem.  Also, you need to be more specific.  What ways?  Whats experiments?  \n\nAsk again with  more details and I will help you
365683
yep, that would be false\n\n\ncongruent parts of congruent triangles are congruent.
54267
The Wikipedia article is (surprise surprise) quite good on this...\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plus
9161
There is a ton of disagreement on this subject.\n\nDo a search for lobsters and pain and you'll find sites that talk about both sides of the story.\n\nHey submitter, sorry you are too lazy to figure this out on your own. Like I said, there is a ton of disagreement. Some scientists will tell you one thing and some will tell you another. How is anyone supposed to have the "right" answer for you?
396644
Interesting...but is there truly any way to know for sure?  It's like the Shroud of Turin, there's so much controversy that the true science in it is lost.  I think that it's the general consensus that will influence the possibilities of orgin and usage (scary, huh).
101009
That's just speculation, nothing more!\nNone of this is mentioned in the Bible so I don't believe it!
146529
Kindly refer to :\nhttp://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20000429/note12ref.asp\nYou will find your answers.
89722
Dear sweet one, \n\n  There is no proof.  If there were proof, then the global population would be in perfect agreement.  There is faith, and there are theories.  And nothing more.