I know he could be stumped-out off a wide-ball. And I guess he should be both stumped or run-out off a no-ball. But, since the bawler gets the credit for bawling out a batsman by stumping, it is doubtful whether he can get a wicket off a no-ball.
203685
AFTER GANGULY THROWN OUT..\nYOU BENGALIS ARE LITTLE CONFUSED I THINK.\nNO-BALL..CANT BE STUMPED.
400858
Very disgusting on part of Venserkar, if he has said it.\nTalent is there. The recent being the two boys 13 years each scoring triple centuries in a 40 overs match and beating the world record of Sachin and Kambli, 721 runs in 40 overs.\nThere are other players too who are knocking at the doors of International cricket. Pujara is there, Joginder Sharma, Piyush Chawala, Shukla, Akash Chpora chipped in well in the Duleep Trophy final. Actually the selectors have to come out of their offices and slumber to see the pile of talent.\nThanks to Greg, another strong team can be prepared quite equivalent to the Senior Team. In the challenger trophy the senior team was beaten by the second team. It all talks about the talent in the country.\n\nThe 15 players:\nGambhir\nUthapa\nBadrinath\nVenugopal\nPujara\nDinesh Karthik\nParthiv Patel\nJoginder Sharma\nNehra\nBalaji\nPiyush Chawla\nRajesh Sharma\nShukla\nVVS Laxman\nGanguly
590196
No,because he do not chuck.\nBut Lee  definitely has a faulty action and he was let off as he is a aussie.\nShane is a great bowler and he is a genius in his own rights.No wonder he has that many wickets.
433653
Well if they didn't I did..chuckle chuckle...as long as oppositions ie:Poms..or South Africans\n\nMost fast bowlers want to strike fear into batsmen,some bodyline n head hunt not mentioning any names...\n\nThommo was a star, who backed up his mouth with go get em ,take no prisoners attitude...\n\nOn his day he was feared cos he left nothing in the tank, a true express bowler...Did he like to see blood I would say Yes cos then he was doing his job of roughing up opposition..\n\nUnfortunately we do not see enough of Fast express bowlers roughing up cos of rule changes..2 Bouncers per over etc.\nBUT in all I would say in the minds of true express bowlers they do like to see Blood, but not set out to maim if you get my drift...Cheers
537492
Stumps at Day 3\nAustralia 181/1\nLead of over 620 runs \nDon't know why they didn't enforce the follow-on despite having a lead of over 400 runs.\nLanger and Ponting were at the crease.\nHayden was run-out for 37, I guess.\n\nEngland were all out for a mediocre 157 thanks to a six-for from the old war horse Glenn McGrath, his figures reading 6/50. Three wickets for Stuart Clark and 1 for Lee. \nNo addition to Warne's tally of 685 wickets, at least for now.
558700
As a cricketer - bloody good spin bowler, but a bit on the pudgy side..\n\nAs a bloke - total moron. he could have led a fantastic life and had everything he wanted but he screwed that up majorly!
426178
LBW is only if the wickets are not hit.\nIf the ball goes beyond the wicket, then its LBW Leg Before Wicket. That means it hit the leg in line to hit the wicket!
310559
first batsman hits 3.while running umpires ruled 1 short.\nso he had 2. but the batsman stays in opposite end. meanwhile the fielder overthrows for a four.the total runs are 6 to compleate the century.  but he is in runner-end.\nnext on strike and hits a sixer to get his century.\nok?
320561
As I stated last time this question was asked on this site:\n3rd last ball, batsman on strike hits a 4.\n2nd last ball, batsman on strike hits to the outfield, they run three however one batsman fails to ground his bat over the crease on the first or second run and the umpire calls it short and gives just 2 runs.  The non striker now has the strike.\nLast ball, batsman hits it for 6.  \n\nBoth batsman on 100.
592374
Twice. Once in First innings and once in second innings. He can get out virtually for third time, if he is running as bye runner for a batsman and gets out by runout. But, this will be accounted to the batsmen who is playing at that time and not to the Byrunner account.\nSo, Maximum - 2\nMinimum - 0\nPossible is 1 also along with 2 and 0
479038
Well in such situations, the match shall be awarded to the side batting 2nd. Because, when the scores are crossed then there is nothing left. You might have noticed, that in this ICCCT (ICC Champions Trophy) in the match between Australia and England, Michael Hussey hit the ball for 4 on a "No-ball" to win the match. But, only the "No-ball" was counted in the scores, because once the scores are crossed, then there nothing left in it. And also, the last wicket of the stumping shall not be awarded. So, the side batting 2nd would win the match by 1 wicket.\n\nRawal.
18814
you can only do 'mankad' to a batsman bfor landing ur backfoot in the popping crease, earlier u can complete ur bowling action ,and stil can do a batsman 'mankad'. no warning is required to do mankad to batsman, courteney walsh once warned shane warne not be out of the crease in a tight macth situation, bcoz of aus has won that match. if walsh would had done 'mankad'shane windies might had won that match.
182474
It is HBP, and the ball is instantly dead. The count doesn't matter at the time. It's not a ball until the umpire calls it a ball, and he won't call it that because it hit the batter before it could get to the catcher.
526870
Friend, you are just like me. Even I like him a lot and he is my all-time favourite player. I always support him. I enjoy his batting to the fullest. When he gets out I feel really sad, but that doesn´t mean that I would say that he isn´t a great player. People may attack him whenever India loses, but I would never do that. In his early years India use to lose a lot of matches. Whenever I heard India won, I could guess it by myself that he must have scored a hundred (100). So I request all his fan to have patients and please support him. He is nearing his end in cricket, he needs our support.\n\nI can sense that my worst day in my life will be on the day he will retire.\n\nI hope that the greatest batsman on the Earth, name as Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar, would play few years more than expected.\n\nAll the best Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar - The Little Master, The Little Maestro, The Bombay Bomber!\n\nRawal.
640250
lets face reality!!!  With the present condition of the team we should not fool ourselves.  There is only a couple of consistent players on the team and too much pressure is put on Lara, as captain and as a batsman.  We can't depend on his talent alone although he is probably the greatest batsman ever.  Best of luck to them though and they will always have my support come what may.
158939
no .. becuz ive seen a match where inzi and yousuf both were middle in the crease and both side of bails were off when they were tryin to make the home.. but only one bateman on that time given runout... so at one ball only one players would be out in any type of dismissal
251182
1.Time-out: If a batsmen doesn't come to the crease after the fall of the wicket the batsmen should come with in a stipulated amount of time otherwise he is considered as out.\n\n2.Handling the ball: A batsmen is not allowed to catch the ball with his hand after the bowler bowls .\n\n3.Hit-Wicket: A batsmen is considered out if he unknowingly hits the wickets(the bells should fall) with his legs or any other part of the body.\n\n4.Obstructing The field: The best example that can be given is the way inziman ul haq was out recently .