How did the government give out the jobs?
206588
Like others have said, work was pretty much mandantory in the USSR.\n\nPlus, they could always have the unemployed dragged off and shot for being "a drain on the glorious Socialist Motherland!"
147192
The biggest impact government had was that child labor was finally abolished. Also, government for the first time supported the formation of labor unions.
612713
Democratic Boss who knows how to pull the string....\nEmployees work at ease and will be willing to go an extra mile without hesitation as they have enjoyed the freedom. They will be more productive as they will feel an obligation to compensate for their freedom and on the other hand such an working enviroment is rare so they would not want to lose out. Off course some employees will take advantage of the democracy then here comes the Boss who is a good at pulling the string a little so that situation will be under control.
253601
The Government doesn't care about working people. The Government only cares about getting reelected.
649364
Nope. It's a scam. The Nigerians want money and will anything to get it. I once heard that in Nigeria, you have to bribe with money, to get hired for a job, or to do anything else.
256891
Are you kidding? \n\nThe reason it's gained so many jobs is because there are so many positions opening in the military.  \n\nThe economy is terrible!  Who are you listening to?
559144
It's hard to say hypothetically, but often when a local government needs to build something, they use cash-on-hand as much as they can and borrow what they need to to make up the difference.  The cash usually comes from a budget surplus. So in your example, they might use $25 million from that year's budget surplus and borrow the other $75 million in the bind market.
445396
The Government sets regulations.
676423
Well the problem there is nepotism.  You may help a friend or relative get a job but there was someone more qualified to get it and should have it.  The people pay taxes to fulfill that position and should have the best applicant - not the one that makes the politicians friends and family happy?
621910
Government pays for their rent. It's like welfare for houses.
568181
ME 2! Seriously not lying\n\nits a law in amercia (looked it up plus my dad lived there)\nthat you can not get hired as it as seen as taking a job from another amercian! \n\nYou have to be able to offer something to the country\ni.e a buisness hiring amercians....
487345
That job is governments. You can construct farm house. For converting, you approach Chennai Metropolitan Development Administration (CMDA).
374716
Easily. The government figures out a way to tax it.
384678
I don't think so...I know in Kentucky you can't unless it is some federal program such as was implemented when many jobs were outsourced.
583111
They were all carried-out by our government.
338427
What do we get in return for giving our jobs away?  A lot of people think that we are outsourcing only blue collar/labor oriented jobs say like manufacturing. We are also outsourcing engineering and other technical work to countries like India via the internet. There are a lot of high paying manufacturing jobs. I get my hands dirty every day at work and I am not ashamed because I will make nearly 50 grand this year. That's on 50 hours per week which is a lot better than some of the white collar workers I know. There is a rediculous misconception when I walk into a store after work with my dirty navy blue uniform on with my name on it that I must be poor or something but the fact is I probably make more money than just about anyone else there.  Sorry going on a rant here. The fact is that when you take raw materials and produce usable products from those materials wealth is created. If you can produce a product and take it all the way to the end consumer you can make a lot more profit. But that requires engineering, research and development, market analysis, advertising, packaging, warehousing, wholesaling, distributing, and final sales. At each of those points wealth is redistributed. It all starts with mining and manufacturing. Everyone else makes some money along the way. A lot of very high paying high tech machining/die making jobs have gone to Taiwan. They are developing skills there that not many here in the U.S. can see the benefit. It makes me sick every time a have to explain what a machinist does. A machinist makes anything from the pistons in your engine to the wheels on your car to the mold that was used to form the shape of anything made from plastic. For example your keyboard, monitor casing, and mouse were all formed from plastic in a mold made by a moldmaker which is a type of machinist. These are the types of jobs we are losing.  Manufacturing drives innovation and if we stop doing this kind of work then our engineering capabilities will suffer due to lack of use. The main reason our country has become so wealthy is because of the huge supply of natural resources that have been mined and then manufactured into usable products. At every point in our growth we have come against obstacles to produce enough to supply a growing population. Due to these obstacles innovation was required. If we allow other countries to do our dirty work for us we will also be allowing other countries to be innovative for us. And we will eventually become weak minded and unable to solve our own problems. To answer the question, "Why is outsourcing of US jobs bad for the US?" It is bad because it takes away from the SOURCE of our wealth and our strength. There are only four economic sectors that generate material wealth: agriculture, mining, manufacturing, and construction. Other sectors, such as services and trade, redistribute this wealth, and are built on the products created by the wealth generators. Check out the link I hope your paper goes well.
650122
Thanks for asking.  Here's the answer.  The government should never, ever, hand out money, or anything of value for that matter.  The fraud involved in that method is vast.  Make sure the people are getting what it was intended they get (eliminating, for example, the old food stamps for crack barter).  Concentrate hard on eliminating the waste and fraud inherent in the system.  Every dollar you save by eliminating fraud and waste could be used to get these people off welfare (at no additional cost to the taxpayers).  Education, job training, relocation.  Once you have a good system for getting people off welfare, then you can start to install restrictions to "encourage" the less motivated.  You could also clamp down on fraud and waste in other government departments and use that "free" money to get people off of welfare and out of poverty.  Done.  Next problem.