what dose "ineffectiveness" means in psychology?\nits definition,its characteristics,and so on????
201571
Affect? Affect is a fairly general term for feelings, emotions, or moods. To say someone has negative affect means that they have feelings, emotions, or moods that are negative in nature. I guess you can think of this as just a fancy way to say "feelings".\n\nCuz I don't see how like "ineffective" would be any different in psychology from what it means in every day life. I even looked it up in the psych term dictionary below and didn't find anything.
41313
It means that you do our best to avoid judging, criticising and condemning others, since all you are really doing is defining YOURSELF in the process. If this is too difficult for you to comprehend, then it is a quite likely that you, in fact, do not have an analytical mind. Analysis usually leads to insight, which in turn affects future thoughts, feelings and behavior. Since you appear to enjoy slamming others given only the slightest bit of information, (I hope you have gotten your jollies for the day), it appears that your quest for "analysis" is a positive endeavor.(Momma should have told you that it is bad behavior to insult others.)\nHopefully, for your sake, you will analyze your own attitudes and behavior in the process of learning what analytical minds are. Good luck, and I hope you get well soon.
648096
I heard a quote once on this subject.  "A man that does not cry, has no soul".   I knew a vicious murderer that I met in jail, that admitted that he cries sometimes.  It has nothing to do with being weak or not.
7262
There is a few answers.\n\n1.They're doing an experiment\n2.They think you suck at things \n3.Your not intresting\n4.They hate you very much\n5.They're not serious
250407
They say superstition affects people psychologically so that if you think its bad you'll feel everything is going wrong\n\nI heard of an experiment done on superstitious people that performed the same test with and without their superstitions present ( i think it was a rabbit's foot ) and they performed better with it than without\n\nand they ranked their feelings of the test a lot better when they had their placebo, it affect you subconsciously i think
377794
It means, no matter how hard I try nothing seems to work out. It's how a man feels in a marriage. He knows no matter what he does it'll be wrong. =)\n.\nApparently someone didn't like my wife comment. Thanks for the negative vote. No biggie. \nHere's a link to where it originated and what it means.
571328
I know what some of those terms are in reference to psychology.  But what the hell is illutions?  Is that supposed to be illusions?  If so, I can probably help.
66099
HMM I DONT THINK IT NECESSARILY MEANS CRITICISMS THAT YOU MAKE THAT ARE TRUE OF YOURSELF TOO. I THINK IT MEANS THAT ATTEMTPING TO BRING OTHERS DOWN (THROUGH CRITICISM) ACTUALLY MAKES YOU LESS OF A HUMAN AND SO BY ATTEMTPING TO PUT PEOPLE DOWN YOU ARE INFACT PUTTING YOURSELF DOWN.\n\nESSENTIALLY IT MEANS THAT IT IS BAD TO PUT PEOPLE DOWN.
635745
I don't know why someone would tell you to go get a book... that isn't in the spirit of this web site at all....\nPsychology is the study of the human mind,  it encompasses emotions, cognitive ability, structure, and chemistry. at the very least.  The word Psychology is derived from the Greek for study of the soul.  The science of Psychology began in the study of physiology.  People began to wonder about perception and why things seem the way they do to us.  It has since branched out into many different arenas and form.  These would include, but not be limited to... Abnormal, cognitive, developmental, experimental, behavioral, industrial and organizational psychology.
532724
#1 = Unrealistic expectations.\n\nWorks like this. I think this person SHOULD _______ (fill in the blank) but they don't - what's the matter with them??? Meanwhile the other person is thinking the same unrealistic thing about YOU. \n\nWhat is real is what exists, not what we would like it to be, or what we thought it was. I don't mean to sound hard, but the clearer about this anyone is the more it will help. \nThis leads right into ....\n\n#2 = Confusing infatuation with love ( love involves acceptance; infatuation does not).\n\nInfatuation involves an imagined, perfected image of someone which only ever existed in the mind, nowhere else. Love involves a "real" person and relating to them, understanding and accepting  their imperfections and not trying to "fix" them like some broken peice of machinery.\n\n#3 = Cultural B.S.\n\nRelationships are something people do. Like everything else we do, they involve suffering, only somewhat more so than most things. In the US there is a widespread view that happiness is to be found within relationships.  This view is just plain nonsense.\n\nI am not anti-relationship, but relationships work best when people have realistic expectations (and as few of those as possible), practice acceptance & kindness (yeah, good old kindness goes a long way) and instead of looking for one's own happiness from the relationship, instead, look for a friend from the relationship & happiness will come from whatever spiritual practice you have.\n\nGreat question!\n\n;-)
341717
This is a very good blog, a beginner’s guide to abnormal psychology. \nShort, clear and simple; and you can even post your question and contact the author regarding particular subject you are interested in\n\nhttp://sensitive-psychoworld.blogspot.com/
319170
Did you come up with this in a clinical setting when you were reevaluating the diagnosis given to your clients from their previous caregivers? (Rhetorical question)\n\n\nSeriously though what is with this talk of getting away with it? Ultimately it does not matter. If a person acts like a jerk they get treated like a jerk. I am unaware of any pretext under which people "get away with being jerks". Could you maybe cite some examples? In the USA there is major stigma against mental illness and we get away with nothing! Not only that public opinion uses half truths and outright ignorance to persecuted people with mental disorders. They don't have compassion or understanding for the people who are harmless! Let alone make accommodation for the ones who are out of control! Just for example a person with antisocial personality disorder would most definitely have the characteristic of acting like a jerk, so in what PC dreamworld would a term like antisocial personality disorder elicit sympathy from anyone, and then cause them to look the other way at that behavior?\n\nThere are a whole lot of people out there serving hard time in prison because of their personality disorders. And guess what? They belong there.\n\nSo in closing, I really don't have a clue what you are talking about.
532632
I think you are pretty smart.\n\nI mean trying to find out what total strangers think of you without giving them reason to like or dislike you. \n\nAn excellent way to study human psychology and interaction.\n\nVery well thought out and executed. Keep up the good work!!
601146
Hey sans! I think that the saddest thing is the sheer number of otherwise perfectly intelligent people that stunt their mental growth by imprisoning themselves withing a system of beliefs. Einstein refused to publish several important papers for years, for fear that they would be seen as evidence of the lack of existence of God.
656656
Read this\nhttp://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/PTO-20030616-000002.html
595437
Thank you for a thought povoking question, and I will try to answer it in a way that you can understand.\n\nWhat I can see, is that reliability is a quality. Both introverts and extroverts can have that. I guess I have to answer it from my own perspective here.\n\nIn my case, reliability seem has something to do with my introversion. For example, if someone ask me a favor, I would not just blindly accept to do that favor. I would calculate it carefully and cautiously. I usually tell people that I would try my best but leave some mental space for them the expect a less satisfying result. Fortunately, I was able to give them a rather happier result.\n\nAs a highly introvert person, I think I would prefer an introvert rather then extrovert when comes to having a friend. Because some of the introverts are rather sensitive, and I feel more relax with sensitive people around.\n\nI think the reason we introverts don't smile much, is because we spend most of the time in deep thinking or in reflection. What we usually think about are the things that are important or matter to us. We can put a smile on our face... mostly towards those who we consider them as important people... to us.\n\nThank you
260828
It's not contradictory. It refers to the net effect of a choice.  You create a contradiction if you reject the statement; it would imply that it is right to cause a terrible result by omitting to act in a way that has minor bad consequences.  How can observance of small virtue justify allowing a great evil?