and not be considered a contesting?
209957
Two possibilities; I can't tell from your post which one you mean:\n\n1) you are not contesting the PROVISIONS of the will, you are contesting the GENERAL LEGALITY of the will.  If there was undue influence, the entire will is invalid.  This is different from contesting (for example) the "$1000 to my good friend John" provision of the will.  This depends on the drafting of the "no contesting allowed" clause.\n\n2) you ARE contesting the will, and if you lose you will get nothing.  But if you win, the entire will is invalid (see above), INCLUDING the 'no contest' part of the will... so if you win, you will inherit.
207354
It is a sport, by any definition. People can say they don't think blue is a color either, but that doesn't mean they have any real facts to back up their assertions.
8603
It is a silly question\nDon't ask questions just for points bro
545664
Don,t complain since the person to whom you are complaining might accept it or not.so sort it out by discussion.iam sure you will succeed
651642
Not politcally expedient to do so
271479
Fine. Don't defend yourself, it's not necessary. People are always going to slam you because that's the way it is. Don't let it get to you.
109627
may be you have a point but don't judge for not being judge \n\nat least i will know that my answer will be granted
6100
The moral issues you cited, by category, should be deemed lifestyle preferences. As a non-lawyer, but as someone who has studied law, my point of view of this issue is that the state should only intervene if there is demonstrable harm present. Some say it should be merely harm, or potential harm, but that will never wash in front of our Supreme Court.
295653
I have heard this argument before.  I would agree that "sports" should not be subject to judging.  One exception I can think of is boxing.  I think it is a sport because someone can get knocked out, so there will be a clear winner and loser.  Maybe the judges in boxing are partly there to keep the fight from going too long.  On the other hand, to compete in events that do require judging such as ice skating, gymnastics, etc. a person must be a very good athlete.  So, I think there are two different things here: 1) a sport, and 2) and athletic competition.
89637
The answer is B. You can not force someone to be treated.
115298
Does entering a competition where you know you are going to loose count? If so then yes, all the time.\n\n(When you run a marathon, with thousands of people, it's a good bet that you will get beat by the guy who's on the Olympic team.)
38966
That it should be reserved for liberals and that it doesn't apply to conservatives.
201598
Who told you that it's not a sport? It's both athletic and aesthetic. Don't listen to anybody who criticizes your sport, or anything else that you do. After all, who cares what some small-minded pinhead thinks?
423921
Argue away!  You are right - it should be wiln't or willn't.  Not really sure how you go about arguing your point with them, though, but I'm sure they have a web site and a contact link.  Good luck!
488347
Being nonjudgmental about things.
567815
There are innumerous people in this site that pass judgement, why they come no one really knows. So while it may seem a little silly sometimes you need to put in a disclaimer i.e. note that you're not asking to challenge but for information or to have an intellectual discussion hopefully that should minimise the backlash, but then again everyone likes to have a bitch.\n\nLuck!
10490
I think it is usually acceptable to break the law if, by not breaking it, someone would suffer bodily harm or death. Also, if the law is fundamentally designed to discriminate, I think that at the very least some people need to break it in order to be able to argue against it in the Supreme Court, for example when Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat.