And what document was affected by his writings?
217495
Part I:\n\n"The universal and lasting establishment of peace constitutes not merely a part, but the whole final purpose and end of the science of right as viewed within the limits of reason."\n\n1. The conception of right--as referring to a corresponding\nobligation which is the moral aspect of it--in the first place, has regard only to the external and practical relation of one person to another, in so far as they can have influence upon each other, immediately or mediately, by their actions as facts.\n\n2. In the second place, the conception of right does not indicate the relation of the action of an individual to the wish or the mere desire of another, as in acts of benevolence or of unkindness, but only the relation of his free action to the freedom of action of the other.\n\n3. And, in the third place, in this reciprocal relation of voluntary actions, the conception of right does not take into consideration the matter of the act of will in so far as the end which any one may have in view in willing it is concerned. In other words, it is not asked in a question of right whether anyone on buying goods for his own business realizes a profit by the transaction or not; but only the form of the transaction is taken into account, in considering the relation of the mutual acts of will. Acts of will or voluntary choice are thus regarded only in so far as they are free, and as to whether the action of one can harmonize with the freedom of another, according to a universal law.\n\nRight, therefore, comprehends the whole of the conditions under which the voluntary actions of any one person can be harmonized in reality with the voluntary actions of every other person, according to a universal law of freedom.\n\nThe key doctrine of Kant's philosophy, called transcendental idealism, is that the mind knows objects in the world only by means of sensible forms, space and time, which it produces itself. Without these forms, Kant argues, knowledge would not be possible because the mind would have no way to order or structure the data given to it by the senses. Kant therefore claims that we know objects only as they "appear" in space and time (rather than as "things in themselves"). While the specifics of Kant's account generated immediate and lasting controversy, his thesis that the mind itself makes a constitutive contribution to its knowledge (and that knowledge is therefore subject to limits which cannot be overcome) nevertheless irrevocably reshaped philosophy. Similarly, his argument that human beings are free inasmuch as their power of reason itself dictates a moral law for their actions redefined the terms of philosophical debate about morality.\n\nPart II:\n\nThe US Declaration of Independence (1776)\n\n"...all men...are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights...among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."
615393
Excellent question! It seems that some of the most important documents in history were short and to the point. Could we ever use an Abraham Lincoln or Thomas Jefferson today! I think it just proves the point that those that have nothing to say, often speak the most but say the least.
294168
You can read his role in the Wikipedia. I give you the link under the source
262844
According to the papers written by Jesus, he got married to a woman and had many children.  These papers have been acquired by the Catholic church and locked away since they were written some 20 years or so after his "death".  The papers also explain the reasons for his "Crucifixion" and who really planned it.
572253
Although I refer to this as a parchment it is in fact nothing more than a few scribblings by Bérenger Saunière on a scrap of paper, reputedly found amongst his personal possessions following his death. I say reputedly because as with so much involved in this mystery, no one is actually certain that it is the work of Bérenger Saunière himself, although from the content it certainly leads one to believe that he was the author.  \n\nAs a document however, closely connected with the mystery of Rennes-le-Château, it is a curious piece of writing. In its style it would not have been out of place had it been discovered with the other manuscripts under the altar of the church.  The original was written by hand. \n\n\n\nThe following is the text transcribed from the parchment and laid out in a regular order:-\n\nY E N S Z N U M G L N Y Y R F V H E N M Z F \nP  S O T + P E C H E U R + A + L ' E M B Z \nV O U C H U R E + D U + R H O N E , S O N Z \nU P O I S S O N + S U R + L E + G R I L + F \nL D E U X + F O I S + R E T O U R N A . U D \nR N + M A L I N + S U R V I N T + E T + X H \nR X V + F O I S + L E + G O U T A + . C U Z \nT I T , I L + N E + L U I + R E S T A + Q V \nK U E + L ' A R E T E . + U N + A N G E + T \nN V E I L L A I T + E T + E N + F I T + U Q \nY N P E I G N E + D ' O R . B . S . C U R H \nO V T S V K Y R M S T I J P Z C K P F X K A \n\nInterpretation of the Contents\n\nThe intelligible message (in blue) reads:-\n\nSot Pecheur a l'embouchure du Rhone, son poisson sur le gril deux fois retourna. Un malin survint et XXV fois le gouta. Cuit, il ne lui resta que l'arete. Un ange veillait et en fit un peigne d'or. B.S. Cur.\n \n\nTranslated it means:-\n\nStupid fisherman at the mouth of the Rhone, he turned his fish on the grill twice. A devil popped up and tasted it 25 times. Cooked, all that remained was the bone. An angel watched and made a golden comb. B.S. Cur. \n\nHowever, due to the choice of words there exists a multitude of alternate meanings. \n\n    Sot Pecheur a l'embouchure du Rhone could mean 'Stupid fisherman at the mouth of the Rhone' or 'Foolish sinner at the mouth of the Rhone'. The word Embouchure also has many meanings " the mouth piece of a wind instrument, Bridle-bit of a horse harness, mouth,  opening of a bottle or jar, entrance to a harbour, mouth of a river or muzzle of a gun."\n\n    Son poisson sur le grill deux fois retourna could mean ' he turned his fish on the grill twice' but it could also mean 'his fish on the grid, on the grate, fire guard, gril also refers to convents,  and to nuns. Twice turned could also mean, changed position, turned over, turned around, turned up, turned back,   revolved, agitated, returned, sent back, sent back in reply, walked back, rode back... the list is almost endless and I will spare you the myriad of other meanings. Remember the large code found in parchment 2 in which it was necessary to reverse the Blanchefort headstone text.\n\n    Un Malin survint et XXV fois le gouta. This at least is comparatively simple and straight forward. Malin does have many meanings but for the most part all of them refer to someone wicked or evil or an evil spirit. "An evil spirit, or a devil popped up and tasted it 25 times". However Gouter, can also mean to smell, to approve of, to relish, to take delight in, to sample.\n\n    Cuit, il ne lui resta que l'arete. Literally it means, 'Cooked all that remained was the bone'. Cuit also means 'done for' in a figurative sense and Arête could also be read in a figurative sense as to stop  'Cooked all that remained was to stop him'. Arête has many meanings, "ear of barley, a line, an edge, a crest, an intersecting angle, a ridge (of a roof), sharp ridge on a mountain." This phrase could also be read as "Done for, all that was left to him was a fish bone, ear of barley, etc.\n\n    Un ange veillait et en fit un pe
188995
Remember that the Apostle John was writing to the seven churches in Asia Minor, and if everything he was saying was never to be experienced by them, then it would seem rather pointless to inform them of any of this. I believe that the beast of Revelation was likely the Roman Emperor Nero, and there is an interesting verse in the following chapter:\n\n"Then I looked, and there before me was the Lamb, standing on Mount Zion, and with him 144,000 who had his name and his Father's name written on their foreheads" (Rev 14:1). \n\nIt would appear that everyone is getting marks on both sides, or could it be what these "marks" are really attitudes and allegiances?" Food for thought.
192988
Check out the following website, but what article and what section of the paper was it in?
73952
written in his/her file...
357719
Every scribe that translated or rewrote would have added the notes in the margins from previous scribes, and then added their own notes. \n\nThe stories passed down are inspired by the word of God, are manipulated by kings and pharisees and written by men.\n\nNothing surprises me.
367542
No, who made the notes? I would find some different source of info
99502
The only thing I know is this:\n\n"Many of [the freemasons] secret signs of recognition, for example, are borrowed from the system of words, signs, and touches that Hiram of Tyre, the master mason of Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem, was said to have used in order to communicate with the vast army of workers under his command."\n\nJust happened to read it yesterday.
13368
I am not sure if he was, but our current bible is missing several books.  Each of the 11 disciples wrote a book (all but Judas), but we only have 4.  Also, bear in mind that the Catholic Bible and Protestant Bible have different books.  However, although I am sure he probably wrote "something" about Christ, I can not say for sure it was a "book," and that his book was rejected.
175299
Try perusing the Federalist Papers for an argument for it or finding his notes from the Constitutional Convention (probably at a college library). Good luck!
22296
Check out the "Lost books of the Bible" you also can find a book that has all the letters written between Pontius Pilate and Herod. They make a lot of mention of Christ because pilates part in the trial bothered him for life.
191970
It is pretty far removed from the original scrolls. In much earlier days, the clergy were the only ones who could read and write, so the ppl had to come to church to learn the bible from them. Then, the clergy started reinterpreting things to their own benefit. I think there is a line about every man should have an acre of land, but every clergyman should have 100 square acres. Stuff like that makes it hard to believe any of the rest of the doctored text.  \n\nOr, in that show that's on right now about the lost Gospel of Judas, they talk about censorship there as well, where things that don't fit with what the people in power want didn't make it into the next rendition.
218144
Info on PDF file is very useful.\nread that one.
163939
the bible is rewritten a lot\nit was changed a lot\n\nits now FALSE\nif you need evidences \njust contact