don't get dirty on me. i just mean what do you think of the big bang theory?
206710
i think that what the bible says goes. the bible doesn't mention the "big bang" so i don't think that it happened.
442775
It is a humor only certain people get. It is kind of crude & insultive but funny as hell !! Proper people usually don't appreciate it. That is not a bad thing. We are all different, we have to be! That is what makes the world go round! I don't get "Trekkies" Star Trek People, but I don't judge! To each their own! I love sick humor & clean humor! It just seems the sick humor is funnier!
598339
No one "discoverd" the Big Bang - it is a theory, not a fact - just like evolution.\n\nIf you believe in God and believe that God created the universe you can still believe in the Big Bang theory - it may be the method in which He created the universe. \n\nBut to believe in the Big Bang theory without believing in God is a Big Mistake. "Nothing" cannot begat something, whether it is the universe, or life. To believe that out of nothing all of a sudden something came into existence defies good science. Even science iteself had to start somwhere - it could not come out of nothing!\n\nLife did not begin in some premordial ooze as the result of a reaction between certain chemicals catalyzed by sunlight. That theory is sheer stupidity and requires more faith to believe than it does to believe in God.
40215
It's one of my favorites. It's my guilty pleasure show. Do you think Simon is meaner this year? I think he's great.
82845
The Big Bang Theory has not been proven. Don't believe every piece of hype that you read. Many predictions of BB and related theories have been verified. Many others have been contradicted. Same with some ID and Creation theories. Some have been verified, some have been contradicted. Many evidences claimed to support a billions-years-old universe also support other explanations. Usually it's just a matter of premises.
414097
I've never got into it which is funny as i used to love cartoons as a child.\n\nI've tried to watch it but found the humour a bit too american (ie not funny) and switched off well before the end.
52356
ur favorite shows? what shows? all i see on NBC now is crap. Its all will and grace wanna-bes, spin offs, or crappy "reality" shows. Its all stupid crap with stupid sexual inuendo's designed to get a cheap laugh, or lame ass jokes with recorded laughter. Speaking of which, heres a fact : If you take any 3 episodes from any 3 "sitcoms" made within the last 10 years, and compare the laughing, you will find out that all 3 of them are the same. The only reason they put those in there is to get another cheap laugh out of you.
322131
They make a good team in the tv show. Individually my favorite is Bill Engvall, really funny with his stories of his family. \nYou like them or not, depending on your own tastes in comedy. I like them, specially when they team with Ron White. The sketchs are funny. I don't like other shows. For example a lot of my "fancy" friends loved Seinfield and I never found it funny.\n\nI don't think anybody should be labelled anything for liking it or not. I am conservative and I like them and I also like Carlos Mencia.
144403
Apparently they look like flying saucers. But I've never seen a flying tea cup that would fit on one of those "saucers" so I don't know. And they might like us, but if they do... they have a funny way of showing it. Anal probing leads me to think that these intergalactic folk might be gay. Brokeback Probing. Ouch.
104461
I can't say i'm a supporter of either UNS / BigB theories coz both isn't convincing enough to me. Your point here is exactly why i don't believe in UNS, as for BigB, yes your argument does suggest that everything starts from a singularity.. then what is that singularity? Can universe be considered started because of the big bang then? or was that singularity was actually been part of the universe all along? if you think from here further.. don't you think UNS sounds more logical?\n\nall and all.. they're all theories, and believes.. just like we can't prove the theories about Multiverse.
115585
The Big Bang Theory is the dominant scientific theory about the origin of the universe. According to the big bang, the universe was created sometime between 10 billion and 20 billion years ago from a cosmic explosion that hurled matter and in all directions. \nIn 1927, the Belgian priest Georges Lemaître was the first to propose that the universe began with the explosion of a primeval atom. His proposal came after observing the red shift in distant nebulas by astronomers to a model of the universe based on relativity. Years later, Edwin Hubble found experimental evidence to help justify Lemaître's theory. He found that distant galaxies in every direction are going away from us with speeds proportional to their distance. \n\nThe big bang was initially suggested because it explains why distant galaxies are traveling away from us at great speeds. The theory also predicts the existence of cosmic background radiation (the glow left over from the explosion itself). The Big Bang Theory received its strongest confirmation when this radiation was discovered in 1964 by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, who later won the Nobel Prize for this discovery. \n\nAlthough the Big Bang Theory is widely accepted, it probably will never be proved; consequentially, leaving a number of tough, unanswered questions.
251563
Yeah I like that show. I think its funny and intertaining. My favorite one was probably the one with well actually I don't really have a favorite show. I just like all the episodes.
7236
i read your blog and nothing anyone can tell you here could be more satisfying than your theory.  you're going to get people either just saying one or the other, or explaining to you what the big bang is or why god is important.  the way you integrated everything in your head is good, and you should be happier with that than any answer from either side anyone may give you.  i agree, except my opinions lean more toward the science side because of my classes in biology and such.  i like where you said god got bored, that's a good way of looking at it.  i think even after the big bang, he played less of a role as people think, like maybe he guided along evolution or something, created that first spark of life and plays with mutations here and there, little experiments.  You'd probably have to take more bio courses to realize how much evidence there actually is for evolution and how smoothly it goes and stuff, but for now, your idea will work better than anyone from either side.\n\noh, as far as your latest blog thing, you would get stuck in the center of the earth, not go all the way through and pop out the other side, because gravity is measured from the center of an object..  Gravity would decrease as you went down, until you got to the center, where you would be weightless, but you wouldn't be able to 'fall' back up, because you would be pulled to the center again.  Everyone on all parts of the earth experience gravity to the same degree.
591850
Why is it hard for people to believe that someone bigger than us created a masterpiece? This all leads into the question, Is there a God? If the big bang theory was true, what caused the big bang? I don't see things just happening all around me for no reason. When you plant a seed it grows. But you have to plant the seed first. \nBabies don't just happen. They have to be conceived. The point I'm trying to make is that if we have to react in order to get a reaction, why would it be any different from the beginning? Someone HAD to create us or nothing would be possible.
414994
You're absolutely right, and the Big Bang has a remarkable way of not violating that law.\n\nExpirements have been done lately that prove that a particle, such as an electron, can be spontaneously created along with an anti-electron, or a positron. In the universe, both particles exist, both have mass, but should they colide, they would colapse into nothing-ness again. \n\nThe Big Bang could have been exactly such an event, but on a macro, or very large scale. Matter and anti-matter exist, and both might make up our universe. That satisfies the law of conservation of mass, as everything particle in the universe has an anti-particle. The net energy and net mass is zero.
420803
Contrary to some of your answers, I have never thought that the Big Bang theory or the Theory of Evolution and the Bible were mutually exclusive.\n\nPerhaps we are finally learning some of God's methods of Creation.
262484
Check the following links, they'll answer a lot of your questions, especially those related to Hubble, the big bang and time.\n\nFollow the links in the stories for addl. info.