what are the similarities between immigration policys after 911 and during world war 2
199706
The immigration laws after 9/11 has become more restrictive, whereas the laws after WW2 became more open to the world.
260414
full amnesty is not the answer. Setting quotas for each country is what the immigration policy has been about ever since the early 1900's. Didn't work then, won't work now.
387579
I think you should read more about US history. The US is constituted by immigrants from the beginning. Immigrants make this economy to keep its flow. I agree with you in the fact that immigration increase the criminal rate, but think about the millions of dollars that they contribute to the US because they can't recover the amount for retirement because they don't have a legal residence. We shouldn't discriminate this people, because the fact that we are living by the legal way and they don't, it doesn't mean that they are less than we are. Human beings are the same in China, Japan, and Cuba or in the US. They have a family to feed, and I'm sure that in this case you'll fight to give the best to your family, even if this implies you to migrate to another country. You have to be grateful with God for give you the opportunity of living in a country where you can find a good job and obtain a fair remuneration for what you do. You should be more empathic with this people. Just in case I want you that know that I'm a US citizen and I don't have any problem with immigrants; my family have lived in the US since 1732, when Remy Poisot (born in Dijon, France) Sergeant of the Marines was assigned to the Natchitoches Post, LA.
439239
Experience is based on trial, failure and success. The invasion of Germany during the Second World War was an overwhelming success despite the losses on the allied forces. It was an invasion of purpose and it’s after effects changed the world for the better.\n\nThe invasion of Iraq on the other hand was ill timed, ill prepared, ill advised and mired in controversy from the onset. \n\nThis invasion unlike the first one did not involve the strategic neighbors from the beginning. \n\nThere was no focus on the invasion or planning for the aftermath as no suitable regime replacement that would be acceptable by the now divided populace was identified - There is a void that can not be filled.\n \nIraq will inevitably have to be split, in order to be governable. That is the only option to correct America's blunder- (Shite and Sunni Iraq).\n\nJust like what Vietnam did for the American leadership of the time, Iraq will be President Bush's dark legacy. Let us just hope Iraq will not be to America as Afghanistan was to the former USSR. (USSR end was accelerated by the Afghanistan invasion and defeat).
438204
Yes, I know the difference. Does our president is the question. There was the invasion of Normandy during the second world war, operation Overlord. A valid invasion in the course of a declared war. What our president did when he sent our troops to invade Iraq was an act of war, as it is anytime a country invades another country without declaring war. Saddam wanted Kuwait's oil. Bush can't find Osama, so this was a diversion to placate America after 9/11, and just like Saddam's invasion of Kuwait and George's of Iraq, many innocent people were and continue to be killed.
243686
infiltrated borders are basically people who have gotten past border security illegally\n\nillegal immigrants are the people who infiltrated the borders and managed to prevent getting caught
107687
It really depends.  It's impossible to give you a concrete number.  The U.S consulate in Ho Chi Minh city tend to be overwhelmed with these files, and could take longer.  Moreover, because of 9/11 terrorist attacks, new immigrants are under much more scrutiny.  My take on it is that it will take awhile.  It also depends on your luck, sometimes they have easy cases that they could clear in weeks.
264441
Because of 911, we need to protect ourselves.  You didn't specifiy which border, but I think all borders should be protected by troops. (...all 4)of border police.\nI like the idea someone had of helping our neighboring countries improve their livelihoods so people would prefer to  only visit us.
58250
I think an interesting comparison - in the spirit of Hitler vs. Saddam; would be comparing Neville Chamberlain and Bill Clinton. \n\nChamberlain was the English Prime Minister before Churchhill in WW2, who proclaimed "peace in our time" when he negotiated with Hitler - right before Hitler invaded Poland. He was trying to appease Hitler - believing that they would be able to "talk out" germany's aggression. \n\nClinton - much in the same spirit - tried to take the same approach to the middle east and Saddam Hussein after the Gulf War. \n\nNeither approach was ultimately successful, and ended up costing more war and ending more lives in the end.
148428
What about the legal ones look what happened to the Japanese during world war two
158640
It's never been convenient, and since 9/11 it's been really bad. One reason, is that of course people who want to immigrate can't vote yet, so there's no pressure on the INS to be nicer to them.
447082
The United Nations Human Rights Council replaced the UN Commission on Human Rights.\n\n1.) It is generally internationally recognized that people have a right to an adequate standard of living, and access to affordable housing. That may not necessarily be "wherever they want", however. It is also generally accepted that the right to an adequate standard of living is dependant on working.\n\n2.) Simple: crack down on the employers. Reduce the available jobs, and the immigrants will go home and/or stop coming. Immigrants come now because they have economic freedom and access here that they don't have at home - if I were a Mexican, I certainly would consider going to the US for work - feeding and providing for my family is more important than the law. If that access is taken away, then it'll go a great deal towards stopping the immigration problem. The fence idea is absolutely idiotic, and is generally demanded by people who have never seen the border, much less lived and/or worked there.
138516
yes because both countries had taken steps againest extremists.Both countries have 50% same cultural values.We can live in friendly enviorment.
201245
WWII, basically the same thing. Germany was blamed the  most for everything.
443245
There are several factors. Speaking as an American citizen who plans on immigrating to Canada, we have tough immigration/work policies because Canada does.
479152
Try thinking about some of the qota laws that were enacted during the late 1800's and early 1900's.  The Red Scare (communism) and the raids against Polish, Russians, and Eastern European immigrants without just cause is also a good place to start.  Think about the Sacco & Venzetti Trial.  The Espionage Act of 1917 prohibited aiding and abetting the enemy; strongly curtailed communication with enemy nations, and the postmaster general was allowed to intercept mail that may be a threat.  The act also created the FBI.  The next year (1918) COngress passed the Sedition Act which prohibited any expression, print media or spoken, against the country.  All of these actions arose out of xenophobia (literally fear of aliens, used to refer to a fear of those from a foreign country or culture).  That should give you a good start.\n\nYou may also want to think about the most recent issues of migrant workers and illegal immigration from Mexico.  There is a lot of political upheaval about that.
223279
He talked about immigration.