Please help me to understand. I ask for no inappropriate comments and please do not be disrespectful. I am simply asking a simple question.
215420
I waited until I was married (when I was 27) - and wow was it worth it!\n\nBut unfortunately (in my opinion) too many people are engaging in sexual activity at a younger age - I'd be surprised (by hey I am old) if it was lower than 14.\n\nThis has been linked to the rise of sexual transmitted diseases, abortions and loss of fertility (due to chlamydia).  I also believe (from friends who work in counselling) that it has a knock-on effect on people's self-esteem.  But I'm sure people will rubbish me.\n\nThe real question isn't "is this the norm" but "what is the best".
210071
dont get it, need a clear Question
299384
Dear Baby,\nYour pertinent question and urgent curiosity has unfortunately, been buried under more legitimate concerns. If you don't get an answer within 24 hours, it is best to delete your query and ask again.\nBaby, I would like to take this opportunity to express my personal opinion. You have been foolish, Baby. Very, very foolish. Anyone can see that the purpose of Yahoo! Answers is to serve as a modern chatroom. More and more, Java programming is becoming less and less supported, there is no other method of bringing people together in a social environment than to create PHP scripts where the "thinking" can be done on the server rather than on your machine. With that in mind, Baby, you should interrogate the shallow-minded participants of Yahoo! Answers with matters that appeal to their common denominator. Questions such as, "How long is the normal tally whacker?" or, "My boyfriend says I should dump my hubby, what you think?"..., would get you a substantial number of replies.\nGive up your pursuit of truth and petty wonders, Baby. Quit asking bland, colorless questions. Are you naive? No person who is capable of giving you the answer you hoped for can last while reading though a heap of puddings, pies and pastry. I'm only doing you a favor, Baby, by giving you a proper admonishment you can now begin to formulate an apology. When you are ready, send your atonement to http://surveys.yahoo.com/user_ad_feedback \nAnd Baby, if you insist upon asking serious questions, remember that a few good jolts from a peace officer's tazor should bring you around to your senses. Please, check your spelling and throw some slang into the mix so you don't offend any of the egos lurking, waiting to pounce on you with crass, thoughtless one-liners.\n\nThank you Baby, and have a great day!\n-Zach
222262
Sounds like a Math/Science type question to me. Why are you posting it here?\n\nBesides, I have the the slightest idea.
27394
I know what you mean by this question so I can answer it without having to be a complete JERK. If you are asking a question to a specific person for instance, people shouldn't get all pissy and tell not to be asking that on Yahoo! Answers. And by the way, I love you sweetheart. Thank you for standing up for me.
648869
Question not understood. Please expand.
593470
Please restate.  Your question isn't clear.
566917
Already answered from here:\n\nhttp://ask.yahoo.com/20050721.html\n\nBasically, it's an involuntary response.
51437
Don't quite understand your question
291143
I don't see what this has to do with Science. Can you not ask this in the society category. Ok, maybe Philosophy but I wonder what made you want to ask this in the Science section. You did not ask physical properties, dimensions, theories, or anything related to Science.
434869
What?? You need to re-read your question. It doesn't make much sense...
645194
You are confusing ME with this question.  Be more explicit.\n\nNo to the second question.  Where did you ever hear that?
374832
Regarding your Edit:  I think you are not getting many answers because people are weary of your antics.  Also, I noticed you seem to be confusing some of your religious terms and cultural precepts, so you may want to check your sources a little better before you start on your next spin off.
229634
aha! the preacher's in town. sir, with due respect it is no one's prerogative to classify sin or non-sin like this. how about sex without consent with your 'legal' partner of the opposite sex (if you strictly follow the 'natural order')? is that all right to do so? and to mention the countries you are talking about, i think people there are as much randy as anywhere else in the world. maybe a little more repressed too. but all that is changing with the societies opening up to the idea of discussion on sex and sexual health of a society. the last thing we want is a pseudo pundit trying to make matters worse for those who feel there is no release.
284244
wow....thats not even considered a question anymore...more of a paragraph....\n\nO.o
438367
Those are GOOD questions.\n\nYou may be enlightened by considering some of the information to be gleaned by browsing the link below:
126684
Can you please elaborate on your question?