I have seen the new one, but what are the differences between them, including ending.
210280
well in the old one the people are explorers but in this one they are film makers. in the old one the freaky people hae paint in the new one the freaky people have no paint weird eyes and they are creepy
159530
My guess is that the movie and book similar, but not exactly same. Meaning that the some parts in the book may be differently interpreted, modified, removed, or added into movie to fit in time and budget wisely. One example of that might be "Lord of the Rings". If you read the book, some descriptions on the book might different, removed, or not same order as what is on the movie. I think that would be the same case with this one.
467582
seen this before, very good\n\ni wont tell cos it will spoil it for the rest
392913
i love that movie. got your message thanks for the comliments...and im sure which scene they cut out but i do know i am a fan.
425055
saw 4 and 5 are to be released.  ive heard one is a prequel; and one a sequel.  i think the prequel will have to do with the flashbacks of the woman that jigsaw was having.  also if you remember in the beginning where all the inspectors are lookin at that body, and that one cop says something suspicious?  i think he'll assist jigsaw in some way
636736
It was once of the best sequels I have ever seen.\n\nWe all know that as a rule, sequels suck. Thankfully there are a few exceptions and this is one of them.\n\nFirst of all, it isn't the same story as the first movie told in a different location. The story is a continuation, an explanation of the story that started with part 1. The location is different of course, and so are the new rules to survival. \n\nBut there are also new special effects and new gruesome ways to die, which is always a major plus in a movie like this. So for those people that thought that the 'victims' in part 1 were not all that 'deserving' of Jigsaw's cruel twisting of circumstances, there are a few better, seemingly more deserving candidates in this one.\n\nAnd there is a not-so-surprising surprise twist at the end. It was kind of obvious, but you get the idea. \n\nmy point? watch it anyway. If you like it, great. If not, then you can at least make fun of it with some relevant jokes instead of having to resort to the usual 'it's so dumb I wouldn't even watch it' lines.
148701
i think the new one is better than the 70's version. it is much more exciting, and Adrien Brody is sssoo hot, but the 30's one is a classic so that one is tops.
99804
I have just received the special edition DVD. Note that to get anything more than the movie itself, you must get the silver-bordered Special Edition, which comes with a ton of interviews and some surprising deleted scenes. :)
630720
There are probably some key moments edited out, I've only seen the original and I would bet they cut out a pretty sexually explicit scene, with Jennifer Connelly and what she does to get her drugs. Man, that's a good movie though.
359614
You can't compare old films to new films.  Its like comparing old music to new music.\n\nMost people tend to say the older ones (of just about anything) are better, but its all down to personal preference.  A lot of modern films rely on dodgy CGI effects and sex, which is why the new version might have done well at the cinema, whereas the old films relied more on suspense and tension, but then the trade off is that these things are harder to achieve with cardboard sets and no colour.\n\nAgain, its all down to personal preference.  But yes, Paris Hilton did ruin what could have been a perfectly good film.
564673
I just saw a few minutes ago and I think that overall the movie was good but the ending was a little farfetched and the dialouge is to dull. The action is very well done and the story is very involving (as you can see In trying not to give it a way) I would go see it, my only major problems are the Hollywood ending and the shortness of the film.\n 4 out of 5 stars.
180889
I saw it the day it came out.\n\nBasically just like the other 3. Same style of jokes, language, etc. In fact, it's basically the same, just with updated movie plots that take part in it and updated cultural elements.\n\nMeaning, sex references, dirty jokes, and those stupid "people fall down and hit their head" things.
226482
I didn't understand the ending either. Initially I thought it would be continued until the next week but then no. I guess it was left open so the story line could continue next season. They can bring back Whoopi Goldberg and maybe wrap it up then.
63235
I don't think there's a continued storyline other than the box is in each movie.  I'll have to watch them again.  My husband has all eight movies.
434305
An excellent movie! Although I have seen the movie several times and am taking a class regarding the Greeks and Romans, I cannot recall any particular historical difference. You could try imdb.com
30363
So far they haven't said anything about producing a 3rd film. I liked the first one, didn't like the second. I don't think the movies ever did good enough to make a 3rd though.
256489
No, it has been to many years.  This is like a whole new series that does not need to be compared with the old movies.  You can look at it the same way as the Batman movies.  It was easy to see Batman Begins as a stand alone movie from the other films because it was a whole new cast and so many years had gone by since the last film.