How do you catch a Brontosaurus? cook it? and eat it?\n\nIt just lateral Biblical thinking.
210586
Yeah, he and Fred Flintstone would go out after bowling and get a couple of bronto burgers.
452299
God said, "I am tired of creating living things. let me just create a couple of bone like things to fox them when they're smart enough to find them."\n\nI have decided to be extremely silly for the next two hours. I ask everyone to give me some fun questions. I am starved for good humor today.\n\nWhere are the FSM believers?
120532
That guy is lying!  The meteroids took out the dinosaurs.  The ice age was much later.  Meteriods slammed into the Earth, kicked up a huge amount of dust into the sky.  From there, the sun couldn't get through the dust in the atmosphere.  Lack of sunlight killed all the plants and did make it a lil colder.  Plant eating dinos died first.  Then the carnivore dinos lost animals to hunt and kill because they weren't there to eat.  No food supply led to a slow death of them and most other animals on the planent at that time
375216
Interesting theory....I'm not sure how well that's going to work for you, especially because so many people see so many things in the bible differently.  If you do find something let me know though, like I said, sounds interesting.
313094
OK, because I'm a complete dork, there's a vaguely to scale picture of the largest dinosaurs compared to a few tanks at http://www.panix.com/~tomr/dino_vs_tank.JPG.\n\nAt first, I thought that the dino would have no chance, but looking at how big they are, maybe they do.  The biggest dino was around 100 tons, and looks big enough to just step on the tank (the WW2 tank, at least). Even with only one foot, that's 25 tons or so of extra weight.  I have no idea if that would crush the tank or not, but I'd imagine it wouldn't be too good for the suspension.\n\nThe big meat eating dino doesn't have a chance--it's only half the weight of the WWII tank, let alone the modern one, and there's no way its teeth could get through the armor.\n\nThen again, like they told me when I learned to use power tools: when it's metal vs. flesh, flesh looses.  I'm trying to imagine taking on a strong metal box 1/4 my weight....don't feel like I could do much against a fire hydrant or a parking meter.\n\nAs far as the tank's weapons...the different types of machine guns can penetrate about 2 and 3 feet into flesh (those gruesome facts came from http://www.steyrscout.org/terminal2.htm and http://www.tacticalforums.com/ubb/Forum78/HTML/000674.html), which might not really impress the big dinos. Depends on where you hit 'em, I guess.....course, the main gun on the tank is a completely different story, but I don't know if you'd be able to swing it on target if the dino was right on top of you.
264398
First you must have (two) drumsticks. At the ends of these drumsticks you will find a bony, grisly coated thing, grab the two drumsticks by the bony, grisly parts and scoot them around real fast on your plate, this is called (spinning your drum sticks), then you can eat them. I like mine with BBQ sauce! HA HA HA HA !!!!!
2717
Follow. But! Follow only if ye be men of valour, for the entrance to this cave is guarded by a creature so foul, so cruel that no man yet has fought with it and lived! Bones of full fifty men lie strrrewn about its lair. So, brave knights, if you do doubt your courage or your strength, come no further, for death awaits you all with nasty, big, pointy teeth.\n\n||  ||\n\n||  ||\n*Tim making teeth gestures at the knights!
504603
Was a good program that answered part of your question on BBC 2 last week...not sure when it will be repeating but it's worth looking for...it was on our U.S. Discovery channel yesterday.  The driving force seemed to be food as other post have stated.
219338
One of the arguments would be the lack of fossils for intermediate species. As there are many fish and reptiles fossils discovered, shouldn't there be at least some half fish-half reptile fossils as well?
638443
I think the word YET needs to enter your train of thought. 10 years ago there was no evidence to suggest that the Archaeopteryx wasn't the ancestor of all birds, now we know more and find that there is something that pre-dates it. In 20 years time there might well be eveidence to pre-date it yet further.\n\nWho knows what will turn up? Do you think this find discredits the theory of evolution or is it just the established theory of the evolution of birds that, until more evidence is discovered, has been undermined?
596663
Bullsh*t. I'm a native Floridian we say y'all.\n\nBBQ?  Hell, yes. Ribs, steaks, chicken, brisket, if you can't BBQ it, it ain't fit to eat.\n\nWhat do we eat?  Meat, Meat, Meat, Meat, potatoes, meat, and bread. And more meat.\n\n\nEDIT: Hey, Crystal: Come on down! Just stay on I-4 until you see a huge cloud of BBQ smoke. Exit when you can actually smell the pork sizzling.
532377
I have studied earth science. \nFirst of all, their scientific name is a (best estimate) i.e. in their opinion. so the wee table is just their own version of what refers to modern day equivalent in science. \nThe only evidence they use to suggest the bible is talking about a dinosaur (rather than elephant or hippo) is a tail like a Cedar.  this could apply to crocodile but they don't mention that - apart from to say "oh -BTW it can't be a croc eh?" without actually giving any decent reason as to why.\nI don't know why I can't read Job 41 18-21without realising it breathes fire.  Such obviousness escapes me.  As also does the beetle chat. err...because one thing (and I haven't bothered to look up if it can) breathes fire, another surely can? What - how does that work? Because a flea can jump 50 times it's own heigth, can I? Also, all earth scientist would love to have a fire breathing lizard, but no studies have proved it's existance.   \nThen later (I'm skimming this now, there's loads of made up stuff), they say "Nobody has ever proven that the Bible contains any inaccurately recorded information" - well I'd kind of like to see the other way round.  Proving a negative is, well, impossible.  If I said there is a planet made of jelly a milllion light years away, does that make me correct until proven wrong? \nthen they do that wonderful thing of "hmm yes we have evidence of dinosaurs being created one day before man etc etc...but in order to see it you have to read through pages and pages of more subjective chat", personally I gave up cos if they are that confident they would put there evidence right in their on their page, or at least give a description of how.  \nThis page is someone's belief and doen't make me think anything other than what I have studied through rational science.
118530
It's obvious why he is shy, people want to capture and/or kill him. I would be very elusive too, wouldn't you? I don't know if dinosaurs chewed cavemen bones or tossed them up in the air or not. Some were carnivorous so they probably did snack on them a little.
325329
Going to see the X-MEN!? YOU BLASPHEMOUS HAIRY BALD MAN! Yer goin' ta hell in a hand-basket. Its a cute one too! I originally purchased it for my daughter but she moved away and its gathering dust.\n\nThe plan is to force you into the basket, hook it to a cable that leads to the center of the Earth - and send you sailing down into da pits. When you hit bottom, yank three times on the cable so we'll know to fill in the hole. You're cooperation is much appreciated. Thank you.\n\n(And you said Creationalists are not polite! Shame on you)
574782
So Christians' proof that the Bible mentions dinosaurs is that Job is supposed to have been able to see one? So, I guess Christians believe that dinosaurs and man were hanging out together. Guess they must be really excited about the upcoming "Land of the Lost" remake. I thought it was going to be a typical summer blockbuster-type movie. I didn't realize it was a historical documentary....
446378
They're mentioned in the Bible I think in the way that a primitive society would write about dinosaurs. As giant beast and dragons and so forth.\n\nIf you listen to most Christians rhetoric about the dinosaurs, you'll realize they cannot reconcile archaeological findings with their own beliefs. Many of them deny the existence of dinosaurs all together. Some say they're not as old as science has claimed. Some even say they lived on other planets and when G*d used the material to make the earth he took the bones with it.\n\nThe fact of the matter is we are living with people who use an outdated reference guide for life. They cannot admit that they've been had. The earth is not 6000 years old. The earth is not 10,000 years old. Dinosaurs DID exist. And we evolved from a species similar to ourselves.\n\nI won't claim G*D did not create the dinosaurs....as I don't know. \nAnd I won't claim science is perfect....we all know it's not.\nBut when you take the overwhelming preponderance of evidence and throw it all out the window because of a book your mommy told you was true.....well, that's just stupid.
252861
Reminder: 5n Theory, all continents used to be attached to one another- so in theory this is highly possible- if two of every species has moved from place to place. Also remember, animals have a good sense of unusual events happening, like earthquakes and things, so they might have had the sense to know where to go. Then you might ask about the unicorns, but it is said that they were too stubborn to get on the ship... dragons and pegasuses... I have no idea about.