if so what dimensions do you believe in? Future dimensions, alternate time zones what?
211785
i think there are parrallel dimensions that acctually collieded to create this universe, i saw it on the discovery channel.  Then again Dan brown's "Angels and Demons" sets off the idea that there is another parrelel demension exactly the same as our except everything is created of anti matter, the alternate of matter, therefore once antimatter and matter collide, boom both disapate.  They have been able to create anti matter.  (can you mark this as best answer)
32939
Scientist belive there are several dimesions.  Remember dimensions are based on measurement.  Length width height, 3 dimesions so we are in the third dimension.  A showdow for example only has length and width so it is the 2nd dimseion.  We cannot comprehend other demensions because we live in a 3d world where only LWH exist.  It is like asking your shadow what is tall, he would know because he lives in the 2nd demsiond.  So there are other dimensions yes and we can dicipher them though the wonders of mathmatics and physics.\n\nGravity works likes a bowling ball on a bed.  Think of the bed as the fabric of space.  If you put a tennis ball on the bed it would "gravitate" towards the bowling ball.  This is the theory of realtivity.  A worm hole forms when a really heavy mass punches through that space fabric.  If you had a million pound bowling ball it would go right though the bed.  The same things happens in space that heavy mass punches right though to the other side forming a worm hole.
51573
I think that we could effectively be multidimensional beings simultaneously living on many planes of reality, but actually stuck in a very limited dimensional spot (for divine choice or cosmic accident). Our actual science knows only a very little part of our life code**, and the reactivation of some dull parts of what many see as a 12-strand code could enlarge our consciousness to other aspects of reality.\n\n*P.S. Principally scientists doesn't yet understand the meaning of the so called "Junk DNA" which could have magnetical and interdimensional attributes.
9843
Science currently views the nature of space-time has a 3-D surface which is difficult for us to comprehend since we are accustomed to 2-D surfaces only.  Like all surfaces they have no spatial boundary.  Imagine the surface of a balloon.  If you were confined to move on its surface and travel all over you would not find an edge.  Of course there is a "above and below" but in the context of the universe these are not spatial dimensions but temporal ones.
267218
Certainly. Would be a total waste not to use all the possibilities. How much of the dimensions you see is I guess dependent on your awareness level, which in time probably increases. Now this goes into spiritualism, which is mainly speculation, but I think after you die, if you have gathered enough experience, you raise in awareness level, and the next time you are born in a body, it will be one, that is capable of "seeing" more dimensions.
415817
You can't move through something that doesn't exist! Time is not a NATURAL feature of the universe but simply a concept invented by our species to separate events into past, present and future. There is no Cosmic Master Clock that keeps track of absolute, universal time. There is no physical "past" trailing along behind the "present," nor any physical "future" waiting up ahead for us to get there.
161219
Okay I'm sure that there is more than a four dimensions out of this well known reality (real life).\n\nabout that string theory I have read a little from wikipedia and it says something, that maybe, the Universe was caused or founded pherhaps by a big Crunch.\n\nTo simplifies it for myself, I think that every Dimension is a continuing line. String is a very small thing that exist only in that dimension and not just one string but millions of it, but only that type or kind of string, for example a flashlight in a dark room you can see those particles of dust BUT refering the -strings- are actually those specific Lumens or Lux that are producing light and interacting in a very small subatomic scale, and refering -dimension- are that beam coming out from that flashlight all the way long to the wall.\n\nYou see only those lumens are interacting in the beam which is the well known Dimension, (we live in it) The Universe.\n\nBut there is fourth Dimensions apart that Can not even touch the beam of light wich represent the dimension or universe we are talking about, because the other Dimensions acording to this theory are beams (lines) but not of light for example another dimention could be as a water fall that comes out of spout (sink dishwasher). curiously that flow of wather is very similar to the beam of light.\n\nOkay I'm sure that this a very deep thing to think about it but friendly I advice you to not get more further because we are just humans and those are very Interesting themes or topics that we can not reach or complete understud \n\nI always have thought that the universe is spheric very similar like that crystal spheric snow ball present or souvenir they give you on birthdays maybe like a Marble.\n\nBut serious talking againg about Dimensions. you know, The Book talk about it, a dimension of living creatures and you know the other dimension of people that is not here anymore We can Not interact each other. \n\nLUX OR LUMENS (a Small Portion from Wiki)\nAchieving an illuminance of 500 lux might be possible in a home kitchen with a single fluorescent light fixture with an output of 12000 lumens. Lighting a larger area with the same number of lux requires a larger number of lumens.
347236
it depends on ones perception of time,the universe may have ended already,but we exist in a dimension that does not recognize it.perhaps the universe as humanity knows it will never end...
649434
omnipotence (from galactus or the living tribunal), omniscience, and  unaided cross-dimensional travel
404725
That depends.  In this scenario, is the future set in stone (aka fate) or do we have a role in what happens in the future?
54615
Science fiction has explored this in tremendous detail, and has come up with no solid answer.  I'm not going to, either, but let me see if I can share a little bit of thought to help you find an answer you're comfortable with...\n\nEnvision the existence of a human being as a path that the human moves along, moving only in one direction: always closer to the end of the path, and further from its start.  So far, so good?  (Mathematically, it would be a 3-dimensional curve in a higher dimensional space; (string theory wants it to be 10 or 11 dimensions, I hear) your perception of time would be caused by your traversing that curve.)\n\nNOW: Time travel says that there is a way of bending this path around so that, although you're still moving closer and closer to the end of the path, the path itself loops around behind itself.  Think of a rope that's laid on the floor in a zigzag or a loop.\n\nFirst: the person who is me in, say, 2020, and comes back to visit me in 2006 is not identical to the 2006 me: that person is further down the path...  I might not even recognize the future me as me...\n\nSecond: I suspect that what happens depends whether the path zigzags without crossing itself, or actually crosses itself, forming a loop.  What the loop would do is pure guesswork...  It might separate off (See: "The Lincoln Hunters"); it might do nothing (See: "The End of Eternity") or it might cause an incredible release of energy, possibly destroying the individual altogether, and maybe lots of other things, as well.  (See: "The Weapons Shops of Isher")\n\nUntil we develop the ability to travel backward in time, we just don't know; all we can do is guess, guess, guess.\n\nWhich is fun--and the source of a lot of good fiction I've read!
285458
The three dimensions they are most likely talking about are the x,y, and z planes in space. Time is the fourth dimension, and there could be more after that. read stephen hawkings book A Brief History of Time. He explains how to conceptualize dimensions in your head very well.
302814
I ponder that a lot sometimes, when I get completely overwhelmed by the pace of my life and the obsessive narcissism of people.\nI have this little 'shoe-box' theory: We are really at a loss to begin explaining exactly HOW BIG the universe actually is, so we may as well just be this compact galaxy, stuck at the back of somebodys wardrobe in another space and time.\nYes, I'm a weirdo...
110324
Yes, time is a relative and would be preceived differently if it could be perceived from all the various perspectives.  Time and space fold in upon each other and we see a result but not the only result.
289306
Actually, the first two answers are right; but, disregarding time, if we were 4-dimensional beings we would still only cast 2-dimensional shadows.\n\nEven 2-dimensional objects also only cast 2-dimensional shadows.  Anyway, what would your 4th dimension be?\n\nShadows are merely the result of an object being between the shadow and the light source; shadow is merely absence of light.  Shadows are always 2-dimensional.\n\nAnd as far as considering time to be a dimension goes, we are IN the dimension of time, but we are not IN the dimensions of width-height-length.  They are attributes used to describe us; they are part of us, we are not part of them.
557313
Theoretically possible. See: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/time/through.html
400830
Events that we think will happen in the future?