If they are democratic or not, names of prime ministers and leadership styles.
199692
This is a two-step process. First, figure which Caribbean islands you are interested in (alphabetical list at http://www.caribbean.com/). Then, go to the CIA World Factbook (hotlink is for Anguilla, the first listed alphabetically) - http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/av.html.
423080
Ahhh, the truth will out.  Power hungry heads of state do tend to be cut from the same cloth.  Change the look, tweak the ideology, they're still the same under the skin.
178426
They are made by Parliment and the Prime Minster(Tony Blair)
545299
Professional politicians.
202993
In a democracy, forged over 200 years or so, we should not even be entertaining the thought of killing an elected leader.  We have processes in place to remove unsatisfactory leaderships.  Those who think killing is the way forward ought to try and imagine a world without democracy eg Zimbabwe Nazi Germany South African apartheid Rwanda
346318
Usually the Republicans however it is not exclusive, some Democrats do also.
318560
I'd check out their voting record, since SOME incumbents are doing the right thing.  If we only keep them, they'll be senior and have more power, too.
345566
It's the appearance of power.  For example someone might have a relatively simple position in government but appear to have lots of power over a particular thing.  Or an "old boy" in your local community may not even hold office but will appear to be able to influence current elected officials.  They may actually be able to do it, but we don't know for sure so it's only the appearance of power.
515040
I think public opinion wants a leadership election and are putting pressure on, but i think the theory runs that we dont vote for personality (a leader) we vote for the party and accept what leader the party puts in place? Hence because Labour is democratically in power the actual leadership shouldnt matter?\n\nBut i agree there should be laws to prevent a straight handover of power, whatever deals Blair and Brown did behind closed doors
437247
France - Dominique de Villepin\nGermany - Dr. Angela Merkel (called Chancellors in Germany)\nSpain - José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero\nItaly - Romano Prodi
345757
If Blair carried out what he said he was going to do in 1996 when he got elected then yes.  But as people find out the longer you are in power the more corrupt you become so the longer he stays in power the worse his legacy becomes.  Proof of this statement is found when you look at Margaret Thatcher.  Has she got a good legacy now that she has gone. Her early work yes but her later work no.  The proposal I have is that PMs should have one maximum term and if they do good great if not then their out anyway.  To answer your second question he has done good in some parts of it but the question is can you tell if they would have happened anyway.  Blair has damaged it in most cases created more bureaucracy, more PC terms, more crime, less means to tackle the causes of crime.  I could go on but I'll bore you to death.  To compare Bush with Blair is no comparrison different political cultures.
506929
Get elected by the members of your party.
284267
British Prime Minister.
615953
how about their relations to people today, everday normal heroes and heroines, or presidents, look towards people of power i guess.
602042
The government would like us to think that we have democracy in this country. But if you think it through, we don’t. At best, we have an elected dictatorship.  We vote a political party into office (usually in protest against the previous one) and that party’s leader becomes PM and he/she dictates to us for four years. If any of the cabinet disagrees too much, the PM just sacks them and appoints new puppets. That is totally undemocratic. When any cabinet motion goes to parliament, the party whips force the MPs to vote the way the PM and his cabinet wants them to vote (or they suffer the consequences). That again is totally undemocratic. We are told that we elect an MP to represent our constituency. But, if you think about it, that is not what happens. We actually elect the member of a certain political party to vote the way the PM (or the opposition leader) wants them to vote.   I believe we should get rid of party politics altogether and all MPs should be independent and have a free vote on all motions after consulting for the views of the constituency they represent. Those MPs should elect the cabinet (with the power to change that cabinet), and the cabinet should elect the PM (with the power to change the PM).
211116
I think u r half informed... king has announced that he will alow election for prime minister post... but the prime minister will report again to the monarch... this is still not democracy.. I wld say it is democrazy!!!\n\nwell the people of nepal do not want the king to continue in his throne but rather leave that for a fresh president and thus become a proper democratic state...
548689
Politician looks more common, but doctor has the right tools.