This question is regarding International Trade.
208708
The BOP of a country is a summarized account for keeping all transactions between the home country and the rest of the world. Such transactions include the receipts and payments for the imports and exports of goods and services.The BOP is diveded into 3 main components including the Current account, the Capital accounnt and the financial account.
536231
You're really having problems with your homework, aren't you? And this one is pretty basic. Look at the the U.C.C. - this is a sale of goods.
556065
hope this helps\n\n\nsorry should be this \nhttp://www.ita.doc.gov/td/tic/tariff/import_duties.htm
161361
Many countrys used to use protectionist policys to tax imports of stuff which undercut there own important industries. Other countrys respondid with simmilar measures, eventualy ensuring very little was traded between the main Empires of the day.
319505
Dollar Diplomacy. Started by President Taft. But the U.S. doesn't/can't just keep printing more money. It doesn't work like that. I wouldn't call it "fooling other countries" though. It's more like investing in what the U.S. wants.
114798
the government is the one who negotiates for tariff rates and trade deals. and basically, thats how you get a local product to another country./
320775
Yeah, but that doesn't mean we're supporting one economy OVER the other.  Trade between countries helps both parties to the trade.  Otherwise, we wouldn't make the trade.  I mean, if it's cheaper to produce something in China, why would I want to pay more to produce it in the U.S.?  There are other things that are cheaper to produce here, and we can make those instead, and support our economy MUCH BETTER than if we're producing things where we have no comparative advantage.
501026
Here is a quote from a letter of a delegate to a United Nations conference on trade and Employment Nove 27,1947.  It sounded reasonable then and is still reasonable today, dont you think?\n\n"Economics , more than any factor, shapes the destiny of nations and the history of human projection...... The path of civilization lies with the development of trade between one country and another.\n\nThe growing human wants with attendant complexities urged nations to seek out contacts with nations near and far to develop trade and commerce on a mutually advantageous basis.\n-------M.A. Ishapani\n----------------------------------------------------------------------\nIf you will ignore the complex words, it all boils down to this. our island have plenty of potatoes tbis year.  The island in front of us, I heard that they have plenty of pigs and the thier neighbor has coffee. Let us trade some of the potatoes for pigs and coffee. \nWe have been doing early  commerce like this , and it is called bartering. Soon after that , we traded with currency, debts and other forms of payment.\n\nToday, we have well established laws and models of commercial trading of goods and jobs all over the world.  \n\nWe are in the process of grappling with international trade rules and laws to govern trade via internet.
196749
well, i don't really understand your question. you mean export from egypt? can you specify please?
185919
If you mean other countries owning shipping ports in our country, my personal opinion is no.  Why should another country have that kind of free access to our information and ports?  They shouldn't, just like we shouldn't have access to theirs.
602871
Ask the INternational Monetary Fund, then ask the American State Department.
250094
That's not very likely. China knows we would support Taiwan and China trades a lot with us.
187269
U.S. has a multi-million dollar trade deficit to China. 1/2 the stuff in your home has, "Made in China" stamped/stickered on the back. They are mass producing everything. Yes, many of the items labeled that way are produced in Taiwan, which is still technically part of China. The reason they are growing so quickly is because of your own noted, "growth at all costs ideology". People in China work for China. People in U.S. work for themselves, their own promotion. Education here has taken a sharp turn for the worse, so next generation of workers may not be as shrewd or competitive.
400453
The reason it's happening is simple: CHEAP LABOR. We still have several large corporations here such as: Wal-Mart, Intel, Microsoft, Time-Warner, etc. NAFTA isn't the problem at all. The problem is our economic outlook, approach, and policy.
466285
It's not so much inherently illegal as it may be fraudulent business practices as applied.\n\nYour state attorney general is one option. The Federal Trade Commission is another. Outside the US, seek similar authorities.
369274
Import export restriction, plus exchange of currency problems and legal problems such as liability issues, insurance coverage.........\n\nMost companies are not structured to deal with individuals, they deal with their appointed dealer only by legally binding agreement.
627986
I can't help with the quote, but...\n\nQuotas on broadcasting like what you've described are really nothing more than a crude form of protectionism.  Normally, when an economist talks about protectionism, he's thinking of trade barriers for foods or industrial products.  Here, however, a law has apparently been created to limit the opportunity for TV stations in Australia to import more than a certain percentage of foreign TV shows for broadcast.  In essence, this provides the same outcome as any other form of trade barriers.\n\nTrade barriers affect an economy in a few ways.  First, they may reduce the opportunity of the country's citizens to access the best possible products.  If indeed the products produced locally are not as high quality (or more expensive for the same quality), then the local buyers are paying more for less.  Furthermore, protections coddle the local industry, and cushion it from the need to compete.  This allows the local industry to continue to operate without keeping up with the highest standards of quality.  It safeguards its ability to deteriorate without penalty.  Finally, protectionism tends to be reciprocal.  If one nation restricts the entry of foreign goods, the nation facing the restrictions may retaliate with restrictions of its own, leading to a trade war.  While this last scenario may seem less likely in the case of TV programming, I'm not sure.  Perhaps another nation would be more likely to restrict Australian programming in their markets if they knew Australia was restricting their programming in Australia.  \n\nHope that helps.