so i typed in ".0001/8760" to a TI-83 Plus calculator and it came up with "1.141552511 E-8" how do i write that on paper without exponents and please explain.
214460
E -8 means move the decimal 8 places to the left.\n.0000001141552511 is the answer.
276533
Correct.\n\n(1350+99)*1.06
475882
I can find this on a TI-84+, is that how you want to get it or do you need an algebraic solution?
601011
extenden notation is the basically spelling the numbers out\n\nfor example:1,234 the answer would be one-thousand,two-hundred,thirty four
331411
If there is no remainder, then this is a *whole number without a* decimal.  Or you could say that the decimal portion was zero.\n\ne.g. 27/3 = 9.0\n4/1 = 4.0\n-28/7 = -4.0\n-2/-2 = 1.0\n18/-3 = -6.0\n\netc.
512581
Hi. 0.754 x 1.0 would be obvious.  0.754 x .1 would involve moving the decimal point one place to the left.  0.754 x 0.8 would involve solving for the last value and adding 8 times.
45233
I have the answer.\n\nYou should change the numbers to be "400.0" instead of "400". This is your primary problem.\n\nThe deeper reason that this is happening is that 400*400/400 is an INTEGER expression. It will be evaluated as an integer, and only assigned to a floating point result.\n\nI believe that your compiler is a 16 bit compiler, this is the only answer that makes sense.\n\nNow let's just see what the compiler is doing. Its first step is to evaluate 400*400. Now if you get out your calculator, you will get the answer 160,000. NOT SO FAST!!!! An integer in your compiler is only 16 bits long, and can only express numbers between -32768 and 32767. The answer that it comes up with is 28,928 (160,000 - 2*65,536). It will next divide 28,928 by 400 to give 72 (again it drops the fractional result because it is integer).\n\nIn both C and C++, the result of an integer expression is an integer. It does not matter if it gets assigned to a float or not. If you want float accuracy, then the numbers in the expression must be floats.
240029
you use the 10^x key\n\nthe antilog of -4.82 \n= 10^(-4.82) = 1.514 * 10^(-5) = 0.00001514\n\ntype in -4.82 and hit the 10^x key (it's usually right above the log key, which mean you hit the 2nd function key then log)
71026
Have you considered some sort of logarithmic compression?  for example, 10*log10(x+1)\nthen 10*log10(1+1) = 3\n10*log10(3+1) = 4\n10*log10(2+1) = 3.7\n10*log10(2.5+1) = 3.?\n10*log10(400 +1) = 26\n10*log10(500 +1) = 27\n\nother types are possible using the natural instead of the base 10 log.   there may be some rounding errors in my numbers, i wasn't using a calculator.\n\nI hope I didn't misunderstand your qustion.
600466
Exponential notaions is a form like 5000 = 5 x 10^3 and 0.05 = 5 x 10^-2 and 0.0500 = 5.00 x 10^-2.  Also called scientific notation.\n\nhttp://web.uccs.edu/slc/modules/chem103/exponents.htm\n\nhttp://lrc-srvr.mps.ohio-state.edu/under/chemed/qbank/1/1-5/index.htm
492713
I just plugged this into my calculator.\n\n[1, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0 | 0\n0, 1, -3, 0, -2, 0 | 0\n0, 0, 0, 1, -1, 0 | 0\n0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1 | 0\n0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 | 1 ]\n\nTake it however you want.
373473
I don't understand "readability" either, but I could point out that I would replace "to the power of " with the uppercase character on your 6 key, the "^". So 4.06 x 10^5 is the way I'd do it.
504431
what it means is this 4 plus negative .01 and with the other it's 5 plus negative .04 its simple. if you know what it means and if you took notes look at them. it may help a little
169541
My computer gives me this 4 real results, there are two more Imaginary results.\n\n1) -1\n2) 1.8698\n3) -0.260\n4) -2.688\n\nImaginary roots are\n\n5) 1.039 + j1.40\n6) 1.039 - j1.40
619540
Scientific Notation is just a way of expressing VERY small numbers or VERY large numbers so we don't have to perform or write equations and figures like 187,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 x 4,500.\nInstead, it's much simpler to write:\n(1.87 x 10 to the 26th power)(4.5 x 10 to the third power)
512440
The +/- means exactly what it looks like.  It means that there are two possible answers.  \nAnswer 1  :  1.487+2.571(0.165)\nAnswer 2  :  1.487-2.571(0.165)\n\nYou get the +/- from taking a square root because (almost) all square roots can either be positive or negative.
610926
it would actually be 4.3927  x  10 to the 3rd power.\n\nyou move the decimal over so that there is only one digit before it, and then you get that # and multiply it by 10 to (the amount of spaces the decimal moved to the left) power.\n\nif it is something such as 0.00043927, then it would be 4.3927  x  10 to the -4th power. when you move the decimal to the right, the power is negative.