Believe it or not, this idea has actually been presented to governnments and space agencies around the globe....
217574
No tides (not true) \nNo intertidal zone (not true) \nNo eclipses \nDarker skies for astronomy \nSome animals affected (such as salmon and turtles) \nDifferent night creatures \nNo gravity (not true) \nMore impacts on Earth by space debris \nNo lunar calendar \nNo lunar phases \nWorse surfing \nDarker nights \nDifferent name for "lunatics'' \nNo lunar fables (werewolves and so on) \nNo nearby place for astronauts to go \nA lost vehicle for romance \nA lost theme for love songs \nNo Man in the Moon \nThe day would be eight hours long. \nThe winds would be much stronger.\nhttp://www.astrosociety.org/education/publications/tnl/33/33.html\n\nFYI \nThe Moon is moving away from the earth which is why the question is in theory with scientists..The Moon is receding at 2 inches per year\n\nAs for your unintelligent insult on which you are trying to be supreme, you have no CLUE...\n\nIn 1897 George Darwin, son of Charles, suggested that tides are causing the Moon to spiral AWAY FROM US. His hypothesis was CONFIRMED in 1969 after the Apollo 12 astronauts placed corner reflectors (like the red and orange ones on a car) on the Moon. By firing lasers from Earth to the Moon, off the corner reflectors, and back again, astronomers measured the round-trip time and, hence, the distance to the Moon. Repeating the experiment over several years, they confirmed Darwin's prediction. The Moon is receding at 2 inches per year.\n\nSo instead of trying to sound politically correct find facts to the basis of your answer DORK..\nSo here is an explaination of why our days would be 8 hrs long.Earth loses angular momentum because the high tide closest to the Moon is trying to get back directly underneath the Moon, while the high tide farthest from the Moon is trying to get as far away from the Moon as possible. Consequently, the high tides flow westward, and in so doing, they encounter continents and islands. The water pushes against these land masses, which, because of rotation, are moving eastward. The net result is that the eastward rotation is retarded by the westward motion of the tides -- slowing down the rotation. The day is getting longer by about 0.002 seconds per century. It doesn't sound like much, but over billions of years it adds up. Not that you would understand..\n\nNone of your previous questions have been intelligent..
71356
you can get those wire coat hangers and put like a lot of different spherical shapes in there representing the different planets..and put each in a different hanger connecting to something in the center of like a base so that it could"orbit"
93508
Sounds to be a good a theory as any other...to say no..would mean closing doors to limitless possibilities..\nI do find it strange that suddenly the United States and China both want to go to the dark side of the moon..They never wanted to before..Is there a connection there too?...ya just never know..\nPerhaps ..very soon we ALL we learn the truth about life and the universe..Just don't expect to hear it from the government.
339757
Space tourism exist these days. As of this year (2006) there have been four space tourists to the International Space Station, each spending more than US$20 million aboard a Russian supply mission. The Russian Federal Space Agency can make everyday people's dream come true as long as the  prize is right and as long as the health and other requirements are met after the training.☺\n\nCheck out this link which contains lists of different organizations or links to what you are looking for:\nhttp://www.umich.edu/~lowbrows/links/index.html#clubs
395125
I wont say it is not happening but I think a lot of it is just plain propaganda put out by governments as the always seem to come up with different dates as to when the earth will come to a stand still so to speak
463182
transporters will perform that function eventually throughout the solar system ! for work, dates, vacations, shopping, school, research, etc., our great grand children to the 5th power will consider it normal. and yes successful sub atomic transportation has already been sucessfully tested and is growing with leaps and bounds and will completely change our world as we know it !
343950
It would be nice if they did in fact control the Gov, but unfortunately, the scale of screw up we are seeing could not be anything but human in origin. \nI mean, if they had the technology to travel hundreds, maybe thousands of light years, you would think they would do a better job of running the federal Government.\nYou see, it's not them. They are sitting back in their UFO's laughing. \nGoing 'Like how did these monkeys even get out of the f*****g stone age?'. And the other alien passes him the alien J and says 'Dude, they didn't, we gave em the tech for a laugh, Old Gfvyusdgf has a bet on about when they Nuke the S**t out of each other'. So the first alien is like '(Bwaahahahahah), cough, cough, that Gfvyusdgf is such a dude, dude'.
103677
Yes it is  well documented that we did.\nIt really would have been impossible to fake. and even more impossible to conceal a hoax of that magnitude for this long.\n\nThere is a vast deal of technology that came from the space  program .\nThe Apollo spacecraft was seen during its trans-Lunar coast by observers on Earth. Amateur astronomers were able to sight the spacecraft, exactly where they should have been, during the trans-Lunar coast and amateur radio operators were able to listen-in on the command module in Lunar orbit. The explosion of Apollo 13 was caught on video tape by an amateur astronomer. Russia and radio telescope observatories not owned or controlled by the USA also tracked the Apollo spacecrafts and transmissions.
138052
Yes, I know of it..Sure, anything is possible. We know the governemnt doesnt tell us the truth.
418594
It is indeed possible...I'm just not sure on what planet.
137167
Yes, it's true that we really sent a man to the moon. It's NOT a conspiracy like some people might think. For more information go to http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/news/2001/news-moonlanding.asp
276604
No. And the loss of their satelites would be temporary at best. They could just rocket up new ones.
496608
Of course not. NASA spent billions of dollars on styrofoam rockets and plastic movie sets. And Congress let them.
564116
Hey, now there's a great idea.
551081
I say this as someone who thinks space exploration is great and who doesn't mind that some of my money is being used to fund it:\n\nThe government has no business using money that it takes by force from the people (taxes) to explore space.  If the people of the US want to fund space exploration then they are perfectly free to do so voluntarily with their own money.  They shouldn't be able to vote to force other people to pay for it.  If enough money isn't given without people being forced to give, then it shouldn't be done.  \n\nThe long-term goal of American space exploration should be whatever the private space exploration groups can get people (and companies) to donate money for.
136001
it was really only recently that we started exploring the galaxies, when u think about it.  we only went to the moon in 1969, and now we have made some significant changes, but i think that it will take some momentum for us to get further and further into space exploration and than we will have space exploration higher and higher until either a disaster happens or there are no humans.  i think that we r already making some significant progress, but i believe that the space programs will be making more significant progresses once we make cars that can use renewable energies.  than i think that ppl will start to look more and more towards the space and galaxy exploration.
378807
I dont know why you think anyone on a genric site like 'yahoo answers' would really know if there was a secret conspiracy in the US government/NASA.\n\nALL the so called 'inconsistancies' in the 'moon hoax conspiracy theory' have been answered time and time again, but the lunatic fringe insist on trotting out the same old (non) evidence\nthis site answers most of their rubbish:\nhttp://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html\n\nI say "Most of the rubbish", because you can never really tell what new 'fact' a hoax-nutter is going to pull out of their a*se next.