celebrities associated with animal killing and conservation
204451
Recently Salman Khan, Saif Khan, Neelam etc were in the news for killing an endangered animal. Also, Mansoor ali Khan was associated with killing of some animal.\n\nWhile, Pamela Anderson, Brigitte Bardot and Sir Paul McCartney have made headlines in recent weeks speaking out against Canada’s seal hunt. Leonardo DiCaprio, Mick Jagger and Sean Penn too are in the animal conservation list.
434187
who are they???\nwhat kind of celebrities??
171236
Wilder Valderama\nBam Margera\nOprah Winfrey\nLindsey Lohan\nHillary Duff\nBill Gates\nIvana and Donald Trump\nKenny Chesney\nKristin Cavalleri\nLauren Conrad
523895
I join & applaud you, I have been a  hunter for many years & will continue to do so. I would never torture & maim an animal just for cruel sport & shoot to kill..and to put in my freezer..As I said in another post, if anyone of these people went to a slaughter house, where their bacon, sausage, hamburger & steaks came from & saw what really happens as these animals are slaughtered, they would think twice about what they say & think about hunters, and as for the folks that dont eat meat, that is a choice of yours & not ours..
380663
I don't think it's weird.  I've always read gross books about serial killers and looked at pictures of dead bodies but if I hear about animal testing or abuse I freak out.  I can't deal with stories about animals getting hurt unless I know there is a happy ending.  I've been this way my whole life.  It's just the way I am and most of my friends feel the same way.
61991
go to www.celebrietyemail.com
625349
I think the Native Americans  were on to a good thing before the Europeans showed up. They killed animals for food and clothing. They respected the animals as brothers who shared this planet. Nothing was left to waste. \n\nI feel that the animal rights movement is a good one as corporate giants would utterly disrespect animals (and the planet) for profit. I also feel that some organizations go too far in promoting the respectful treatment of animals. Some times to the detriment of the whole movement.\n\nWe are in a symbiosis with the animals of this planet if they disappear how long before we disappear?
108237
has to be the bear. They can rip a head off an ox with one swipe.
427350
yes indeed they are.\nthey spent a weekend in Las Vegas with a number of other celebrities and obviously recieved VIP treatment.\nIt was particularly important that britney be out because it was when the whole controversy with her divorce was publicized.\n\nDon't listen to these losers, its ok to read and be interested in popular media.\nafter all, they are busy on here talking crap about people like us when they should be saving animals from wells or something.
344328
Most of the time its a near endangered species.  They usually aren't so bad that they are on the endangered species list but are close.  It can act as a way for animal rights people to protect them even though they aren't at the needed population level to be protected.  This is true most times, but not all.
236811
The best site for this is www.findadeath.com.  I promise you that you could spend days at that site looking up the deaths of celebrities and their final moments.  They have a lot of pictures too.
168880
Paris Hilton, Angelina Jolie, Lindsay Lohan, Hilary Duff, Beyonce Knowles and many more
13860
Gazelle???\nThats cruelty to animals!!lol
484095
agree 100%\nno animal is at fault\nexcept the human animal\nthe owner of the animal should be jailed & fined for what his/her animal did\nthe animal is only defending itself
155280
you should do your research paper on animals. They are always interesting.
468702
wow they are stupid and youre right but the thing is that peta does only care about cute lil puppies and not about wildlife and just want celebrities to join them\n\n(people are mamals so it is agaisnt waht peta stands for when the hurt/kill them)
124995
I think that foxhunting causes significant levels of pain and distress to animals, and that to do so merely for frivolity and entertainment is wrong, so I support the ban.\n\nHowever, I do understand the need to control animal population levels, particularly if excessive numbers of a certain species are damaging the ecological balance. This should, as far as possible be done in a quick and humane way, without the protracted fear and stress induced by a hunt.