the answers to choose from are...\nthe islamic religion,\nintroduction of camels from Central Asia,\nirrigation systems,\nor an organized government
210912
They butchered half the Sudan, you tell me.
659451
First it is freedom.  True freedom, personal, religious, and political is the solution. With out that your country will continue as it is forrever.  No amount of international help (food, money, pats on the back) will help. Those things only keep those in power stay in power.
184315
EDUCATION !!\nThan of course you can judge and think by yourself looking up the religious things..\n(I don't sound educated at the moment..but I'm tired !)
383258
The Middle east is controlled mostly in name by it's official leaders. Religious leaders actually control most of the Middle East and Africa as well as parts of Asia.  These figures operate in a complex political environment. Their first goal is to oust seculer or semi-seculer governments like the ones in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Beharain, Nigeria and Turkey. Once replaced with Islamic governments under thier control they will rapidly expand into Africa and Asia.  They will be beholding to external forces though. The Islamics because of the represive nature of thier rule have killed thier ability to use and produce technology. As such a forign entity will gain control of them and use them to thier own needs. China is the leading cantidate for that right now.
219052
Wow, dude, you expect a lot. Ever heard of research?\n\nA few ideas:\n\n1. Given that it's virtually impossible to control the movements of all the people all of the time, you have to provide them with a certain degree of freedom anyway. True, if you kept someone in a box for the rest of their life, it's pretty safe to say he won't be committing any atrocities or breaking any laws. But since that in and of itself would be immoral, there has to be some degree of freedom.\n\n2. If people are allowed to make decisions about the direction of their own lives and are allowed to pursue happiness, they will usually be less likely to break laws or try to hurt others.\n\n3. An example: a child who is never allowed to make choices for himself never learns to make them and grows up to be a problem. A child who is brought up lovingly, rewarded for good choices, educated, and slowly but surely given the freedom to make its own choices usually makes much better moral choices.\n\n4. Societies with less personal freedom do not necessarily enjoy a clear moral advantage. For example, in certain areas of Pakistan (which is a conservative Muslim country), there is less promiscuity because the laws against promiscuity are so harsh and personal freedoms are so limited, especially for women. On the other hand, particularly violent crimes are often directed against women. Mukhtaran Bibi was gang-raped in a conservative Pakistani village as retribution for a crime her younger brother never committed. In fact, her brother was sexually molested by three men himself. (See link before for more info). It's not uncommon in societies with strict moral codes and corporal punishment for the weakest members of the society (women, the poor, etc...) to be the victim of oppression, crime, and torture.\n\n5. Sometimes a society that reacts too strongly against a certain behavior actually encourages it. When something is forbidden, some people will naturally find it that more compelling.\n\n6. Some people have a tendency to come down very hard when it comes to OTHER peoples' sins but not on their own. For example, although the Bible comes down way harder on divorce and remarriage than on homosexuality, most Christians openly despise homosexuals but don't criticize divorced people at all. When you couple this hypocrisy with a society that has highly repressive moral standard, the result is often violence: for example, men who may (or may not) have repressed feelings of homosexuality beating an openly gay man to death. An example of this is in Wyoming when Matthew Shepard was brutally beaten and left for dead by two homophobic men who, feeling themselves "morally superior" to a homosexual, committed a particularly vile crime. More info on Matthew Shepard below (or you can google him yourself.)\n\nWell, that's a few ideas. Hope that helps.
142452
School Curriculum is tough to say the least. There are various ways of transport. Cars, public buses, rickshaws, auto rickshaws. Nobody rides camels. Camels are meant for the desert, and India does not have a desert.
172984
Historially, a secular government is great for any religious follower who doesn't want to get burned, drowned, hung, or beheaded for their religious beliefs.  And I think that is the issue:  a lack of historical understand of how Theocracies have worked, or more accuretely haven't worked, in the past.\n\nPersonally, I don't want any government telling what I can or should believe.  Religion is a personal choice, not a political one.
357944
Quite possible since thay both head up tyrannus administrations.. one being government, the other monotheistic religion. Not much difference there.
105862
I've gotta say Turkey. It is more developed than Kazahkstan. It has more influence, bigger businesses and a larger military. Then again, Kazakhstan has oil and that may be a huge factor for them in the future. I just dont see it growing quickly without Russia backing. Turkey is more developed in the international community.
632251
The city\n\nwhile it might be more expensive it is easier to get converts and its a lot harder for the government to use excessive force if others might be harmed.
649110
The Ayotollah. The Ayotollah governs what muslims do, and the president is a Muslim. Nuff said.
548506
Wow, you have quite a challenge ahead of you...\n\nLet's see. Often times a zealous theocratic government can reduce crime. I guess there could be a sense of unity and common purpose among the people. It might also be easy to mobilize the people to war or big projects, i.e. the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980's. \n\nThe ruling religion could also offer possible protections and rights to the people. For example, many devout Jews and Christians do not believe in working on the Sabbath. If you had a theocratic Jewish or Christian government, the people might at least have a few days off that they wouldn't enjoy under a secular totalitarian regime (like a Communist government).\n\nYou might want to read up about Iran, Tibet, and 1990's Afghanistan to come up with more ideas. These are/were all theocratic states.
216553
for china it would be:\nWealthy Landowners\n\nPeasants \n\nMerchants
517210
it depends on what route you want to do... nature vs nuture.. is a on going debate..you can also compare and constrats the beliefs of a certain religion.. or lets see...you can make easy and compare and contrast 2 different states comapring thier different attributes and contrasting as well
332676
The only solution of the present problem is the emergence of one unified state, state in the name of Islam. Only Islam has the potential of challenging this ideology of capitalism lead by USA. \n\nWhen i say Islam, i mean real islam and not the islam of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, etc. But what actually practiced by the Prophet Muhammed (peace be upon him) and his followers.
81353
It won't happen any time soon.  The government in Afghanistan does not make laws the way they have come to be made in the west.  We have had a long history of writing and revising law.  They have a system of laws based on a religion that started 1400 years ago. There has to be a change in thinking, to a more rational, modern approach.  At present, the power is in the hands of the religious fanatics. They will not relinquish that power without a struggle.
408672
A human baby. And I'm as liberal as they come. Trees are of course important, whales less so - but they play a vital role. However; humans have rights, animals and plants (largely) do not.