A woman and her baby was in a fast food restaurant which had a sign hung at the entrance that read "No outside fast-food allowed". A waiter approached the lady while she was holding her baby in her arms, to leave the restaurant. Why was she asked to leave?
218278
she breastfeeding her baby ,there was no outside fast food allowed
633801
Your baby should not have any hands and feet inside of it.\n\nSee you doctor immediately!
429472
I worked at wendys this time last year for some extra cash when the kids were in bed and hubby was done with work. We had this really nice lady from ehtiopia working there ( her 3rd job no less ) she asked this guy if he wanted a combo ( was cheaper ) he yelled, DID I SAY I wanted a combo ? He kept yelling and I was over in the drive thru and I heard him and went over there ( the manager was doing something else of course )\n I was like sir is there a problem. He starts raving like I didnt say I wanted a combo and on and on ( the dining room was packed! )\n Finally after about 1 minute or 2, he stopped yelling and said "What do you think about that ? "\n I politely smiled at him and said, " dang mr, if this food wont give yiou a heart attack your ugly attitude will."\nEVeryone in line started laughing, hes screaming he wants my manager and my name, I said my name was juanita( it isnt,,lol )\n The manager came over and said sir we don't want your business and please leave. \n He called and made a big stink but you know what, that ethiopan woman was JUST DOING what she was trained to do. As my pastor says, some people have to act like that cause its the only power they have in their life.\n\n I gave my friend a hug and told her to chin up cause she was really upset.
171683
I would think the best way to handle it would be to simply ask her to move her car (without it being strongly worded). Explain the situation -- Excuse me, ma'am, but your car is blocking the drive-in. Would you mind moving it? Being non-confrontational in your wording -- ie no curses, nothing too strongly worded, no insults -- is often a more effective (not to mention polite) way to acheive your goal.\n\nAnd if she refuses, then involve the manager. The manager will doubtless not want to lose the customers trying to get to the drive-in and rental kiosk and speak to the woman again.\n\nAnd if all else fails -- just have patience. Wait inside away from the fumes if they're bothersome.
29222
Sometimes you don't want to tip because the server gave you almost no service.Heres your seat ,what do you want to order,here it is and then put the check down.......What happend to may I get you something else..would you like your food  boxed. you know the service part...Then you see a post like this one.must be from the one who did not give you the service as it seems alittle short..IE.( get a job as a server making $2.13 per hour for 1 week and ask this question again.) ...........Tipping is by the service given..If you took that job "wait person" . So smile and give service like you would want given you.Then you'll get a TIP
121918
She thinks it makes her look skinny cause she's pregnant and thinks she's fat now. Someone should give her the memo that it's ok to gain weight when your pregnant.\n\nBrad is just a follower he sux.\n\nthe kid is cute, maddox.
118277
Yes.  I was talking with a friend of mine and told her that a mutual friend of ours was pregnant.  Another friend that knew the supposedly pregnant woman had told me, and I trusted her because she was roommates with the woman at the time.  My friend said the woman wasn't pregnant, she was depressed and had put on a little weight.  I said no way (not very nicely) and my friend got angry.  A couple of days later, I asked the woman if she was pregnant and she burst out crying and told me about losing her boyfriend.  I was so embarrassed.  I called my friend and asked her out to dinner and while we were eating (she is a forgiving soul, and I was picking up the tab :)  ), I apologized and said what a jerk I was.  She agreed with me and let it go.  I try to verify things now.  If I am going to take a strong stand on something I say, I want to be well informed.
28158
Q1 - I would say that this was pretty un-important so I'd rate it a 1. After all the General Manager can do what they like, they are the boss and if they did not feel that they wanted to inform the employee before hand then it is up to them. It probably would have been a nice gesture to let employee A (if that is their real name, which I doubt, lol) know what his intentions were before hand as this would have created a good feeling in employee A as they are kept informed of the situations, but it is not essential for the manager to do so. Also the manager has no responsability to say anything to the employee A about what he did, but again to keep the employees happy it would be nice for them to apologise and tell them the reason that they didn't inform them before hand. Maybe the manager forgot, or maybe they only just made the decision before the meeting and they hadn't seen employee A between the meeting and the decision in order to tell them.\n\nQ2 - It really depends on what the meeting is about. If it is a crucial meeting then the best thing to do would be to lie to the boss. Tell them that there was an accident on the way to work (not involving you) and you got stuck in traffic for ages, or that you are having car trouble, or you were on the phone to the hospital, or you could even say that you were on an important business call with a very important client, but make sure that you have a full story to tell incase they ask for more details. The severity on this offense is probably around 2.5 to 3. Just make sure that the first thing you say is 'I'm really really sorry I'm late, but...........'\n\nQ3 - This is probably a severity 1 rating. Everyone has off days and if you have to keep telling your kids the same thing it gets annoying what ever mood you are in. When you calm down from the situation just speak to your child and tell them you are sorry that you shouted at them, and explain that you got mad because you have told them several times before. Make sure that you offer to go through the problem again with them now so that they can understand, and make sure that they listen properly this time. They probably will liten this time as they won't want to be shouted at again.\n\nHope this is all ok for you, have a nice day.
605178
i agree with u on this one, if they dont want your advice then they should keep their mouths shut.  so to those that are listening, if u cant stand the heat, stay the hell out of this kitchen.  cause some of us here are cooking up some good stuff and if u aint going to eat here then go to another resturant.
106564
You need to work on your question.  \n\nCan your son be arrested for trespassing on mall property?  \n\nYes.  (and he was, so that seems like a no-brainer).\n\nCan he be arrested for trespassing on mall property for ordering a meal to go at an independent fast food place?\n\nSee above.  \n\nCan he be arrested for doing what you've described above, when he was (according to you), only asked to stay out of the inside of the mall?\n\nWell, again...he *was* arrested, so evidently he *can* be.  \n\nBut I suppose this is the crux of your question, right?  Since he wasn't actually inside the mall, and was only in one of the fast food joints that are in the parking lot (and it's not attached to the mall??), is he actually guilty of trespassing?  I would suggest not.  If the fast food joint is attached to the mall, and especially if it's got an entrance into the mall proper, I'd suggest he's guilty, even if he came in through the door that's facing the parking lot.  Ridiculous, really, what the law can sometimes hinge on.\n\nWhat can you do?\n\nHire an really expensive lawyer, and see if you can get your son off on some minor technicality.  That'll show him that when he does what he's been asked not to do, someone will find a way to keep him from being held accountable for his actions.\n\nOkay, that's a little tongue-in-cheek, but I stand by it for the most part.\n\nYour kid got told to take a hike.  My reasonable assumption is that he was told that because his behavior wasn't consistent with behavior the mall owners want their patrons exposed to.  Your kid is a knucklehead for coming within a mile of the place after he was told to go away.\n\nBut kids are knuckleheads sometimes, and that's part of being a kid.  The thing is, at 16, this kind of thing really is going to be a very minor speed bump in his life.  You and he probably don't see it that way now (your kid wanna be President some day?) and I understand that.  Assuming he's never been in trouble with the law in the past, and assuming you have all the facts, I'd be surprised if he got anything more than a slap on the wrist...maybe some community service time or whatever.  \n\nSo what you can do is talk to your kid now about what he did, and what would have been a better way to deal with this situation.  When you get to court (and are you sure you're going to *court*, and not just the Probation Department for what's often called a "cite hearing"?) you can explain that you and the little devil have talked at great length about his offense and he understands what he did wrong and knows a better way to deal with this in the future and blah, blah, blah...tell them what you think they want to hear, and get your kid to be a little smarter in the future about things like this.\n\nYou can hire an attorney, or you might be able to qualify for the public defender.  \n\nYou can throw yourself on the mercy of the Court, ask to be publicly flogged, and insist on taking your son's punishment for him.  It won't work, but it will humor the heck out of everybody there.\n\nLook: I don't want your kid punished unfairly any more than you do.  I've got three of my own, they've all done knucklehead things themselves at one time or another, and I've stood up for them if there was somewhere reasonable to stand.  If your kid really was told only to stay out of the inside of the mall, and he wasn't *in* the mall, then I think that's a real reasonable place for you to stand and support your kid...if they didn't want him on the property at all, that's what they should have told him.  \n\nIf he truly didn't understand where he could and could not be, then advocate for him.  If you think he knew he was pulling a fast one, let him get spanked for it...he needs to be held accountable for what he's done, if you think he did what he knew he wasn't supposed to do.  He's not going to
505595
An excellent question and an interesting set of answers.\n\nEssentially, what she made as a signed 'non consent' has to be adhered to.\n\nIn the throws of labour, people say all sorts of things that they later either do not remember or regret. In addition, she could have been taking gas which may have affected her judgement. At the time she requested (and insisted upon) the epidural she was not offered the opportunity to recind and overrule her previous request *in writing*. Had the hospital done that, they may have been in a better position of defence. Also, the original request stated 'under any circumstances'. \n\nIt is very surprising that the hospital 'gave in' to an epidural as most often these days, they either say 'it's too early' or 'it's too late'.\n\nThe hospital could however have argued that they were forced to give her an epidural for the following reason. If the mother is not fully dilated yet is pushing the baby out, this can cause a severe tear in the cervix. Hospitals do sometimes try to slow down the urge to push by administering a partial block (epidural) to get the mother to relax and allow some more time for the cervix to dilate further.\n\nHowever, if I'd been at the hospital and forced to make the decision, I would have opted for a C section at this stage as the labour was long, drawn out, the mother was becoming overly distressed and the epidural was not allowed.\n\nSo, all things considered, I believe that the hosital was wrong to give her the epidural, but the mother was also wrong to pursue them through the courts. If I'd been a judge I would have found in her favour, but awarded her minimal damages as she could have asked fo ra C section herself instead of going against her written request to not have an epidural, and she could have 'engineered' the whole thing.
281643
Not even near 300, I went to a restaurant one day and sat near a mother and daughter.  She was the cutest 5 year old you could imagine.\n\nNow, true to form, she said to her mom, pointing at me, 'Mom, he's really fat!'.  And I kept my composure as her mom told her that wasn't nice and to stop.  After a couple of times, she had to take her stand for what she believed in, stood up, pointed at me, and said, 'MOM!!! YOUR DON'T UNDERSTAND!! HE IS REAAAAALLLYYY FAATTTT!!!'.  She announced her convictions to the world in such a way that no one could doubt who said it, and who she was pointing at.\n\nI put my utensils down...put money on the table, and just walked out and went somewhere else to eat...ALONE.\n\nIt's not your business how other people run their lives, and that goes for fat, smoking, or any other idiosyncrasies they have.\n\nPolitically corect is minding your own business to the general public, you don't know and it's not their responsibility to explain their life to anyone that thinks differently.
244673
Wow - this is the "Hey Jude" of questions - it never end, and it may be the longest question I've ever answered. Anyway, one of my pet peeves ia when people or businesses misuse quotation marks (For instance, in a restaurant - Try "Our" Famous Clam Chowder, or "Try" Our Famous Clam chowder, or even Try Our Famous "Clam" Chowder.\n  Secondly, of course is BAD DRIVERS!!  Drivers who don't signal, go under the limit, or who pull out in front of you at the last minute.\n  In an unrelated area, though, I would like to comment upon your apparent negative feelings toward women.  It sounds as though you have been hurt and are carrying some anger about that.  I would address those issues or your anger can make you a very unhappy person.  Good luck!
567768
I guess I'm kind of odd, but I don't care for pregnant women posing like that. It's like they're using their pregnancy (and their baby) to get attention. Plus, it's almost like she's desperate for something to do to gain attention.
384975
Yes I believe an owner operator has the right to refuse service and remove potential costumers. This is called Free Enterprise. You can choose to serve whomever you want within reason, (debatable in the courts) and there is the other side as well. The client can go elsewhere. It's your choice as to who you want to patronize with your business. Two points here: some time ago I was asked to leave an establishment and refused the employee's demand. He then took away his service and I had no choice but to leave. The following years the establishment across the street gained some thousands of dollars in business from me and the other lost.  Second point; a convenience store operator asked a pointed question about my property inferring that I had stole from her. I then laid out her product I had picked up to buy and left them with her to put away. I left telling her that the insult was not to my liking and I've never gone back. \n  It's Free Enterprise. You and I can choose where we buy our products and the owner operators are free to discriminate to their own detriment.
526831
Hospital OR Fire Station, the Baby Moses law. I dont get even with that law these immature irresponsible people cant just take their baby somewhere where it will be safe.
114599
Between the time the bartender told you to leave, and when the cops arrived you must of had an opportunity to go out the door. That action would have shown you intended to comply with the bartenders order, you wouldn't have been ID'd, and no complications. Usually bartenders are legal agents for the owners and have the authority to remove patrons without giving a reason for doing so. It may be a place that is open to the public, but not public property. \nFind another place that is more relaxed.\n\nThe usual conversation:\nCop:(to you) Did this bartender tell you to leave?\nYou: Yes.\nCop: Then why are you here?