Or are there other primary traits?\n\nPlease elaborate as you wish.
215376
Being aggressive is a good trait. But you will need more than that to become successful and earn a substantial income. The choice of the enterprise you like to be involved is important. It should be legal and acceptable. Then you check on your own attitudes. Are you in this enterprise solely for money or you have a bigger picture. Do you love what you do because it helps the community? Are you able to stick to it long enough? Are you prepared to modify your operations to improve? What about putting time and effort into research? Please remember that your actions is like a mirror that will reflect on your result. So keep this mirror clean and clear.
159244
I think there are more than two factors....and you answered your own question.
209641
When you were born does not determine personality.  Heredity and environment determine personality, regardless of what astrologists try to tell you.
339697
curly ears would be dominant trait because when the kittens all had the dominant trait . The recessive trait (normal) didn't show up in the kittens. it is because the gene appeared\nfirst and has more % of it showing up
21908
People possess many good characteristcs or traits, such as being trustworthy and attentive to your needs.\n\nIf the words can't be changed, let me know. I'll ajust my answer. You didn't specify.
567818
question is too general. Anyway, maybe professionalism, leadership, good time & resource management, hard working.
132203
The first thing would be their physical appearance..\nBut they ultimately look at how caring and true they can be..
439964
There is no evidence that any of the described traits are favorable.  Larger eyes are might or might not be of any benefit.  Although more area might improve reading, we have not needed more light gathering since Edison invented the light bulb.  The shape of the nose is subject to multiple pressures.  If we all eat processed foods, sharp teeth lose their advantage.  If we eat more steak, no.  Our front teeth will remain flat as it is essential for speech.  Our lips cannot lose much or they alter our speech patterns.  Our pinkies, so long as we use keyboards are unlikely to recede, and as our interactions with technology increase, might increase in functionality.  Larger brains may be possible, but it may be limited by birthing.\n\nI think you received a bigger dose of Science Fiction than Science.  Challenge your teacher to demonstrate the selective pressures that would produce the changes he suggested.
84583
Its all just genetics, the more dominant genes define what colour shape and size of everything about you is.
250211
You can pretty much be any one of them if you are not the other three and still do alright. The problem is if you possess more than one of these traits.
279917
It is very difficult to correlate genetic differences to physical differences, and physical differences to behavioral differences.  For example, women and smaller men may have smaller brains than larger men, but this means nothing as far as cognitive differences.  \n\nIt takes a very minor genetic difference (the coding affecting the skin pigment melanin) to cause differences in skin color, and even then the effects of environment are noticeable, and just one or two generations of interbreeding can dilute many of these variations.  With brain development and behavior these differences are *far* more complex, genetics almost irrelevant compared to environmental differences, and what genetic differences there are made even more irrelevant by the fact that we are all one species and can (and do) interbreed.\n\nSo it's a reasonable question from a scientific point of view, but scientists are hyper-aware than *any* misinformation, dead-end theories, faulty studies, etc. can be (and have been) badly misused by really bad people.
35566
That depends upon the definition of 'intelligence' and there is not just one. People tend to identify human-like behaviors with intelligence, but what is it? Learning ability? Tool use? Self-consciousness?\nI don't know.\n\nSo that's my non-view on the subject, as a biologist.
277476
No.\n\nThere are several reasons. First, most "animal characteristics" are not the result of a single gene. Instead, they require many genes products working together with each other and the rest of the body. This is a level of complexity we simply don't understand yet.\n\nAnother major issue is getting the DNA into a person. People are beginning to experiment with modified viruses (ie, cannot replicate) for this purpose, but so far nothing has worked very well. Probably the biggest obstacle to gene therapy is a workable way to get new DNA into a person's cells.\n\nIn simpler organisms the DNA modifications have been done directly with fertilized eggs. That's a simple thing to do with plants and fruitflies, but a very difficult thing (not to mention the ethics involved) to do with people.\n\nWhile we are very able to insert particular genes into some cells, don't look for animal characteristics in the foreseeable future.
117888
Personality.\n\nIntelligence can be improved... personality will seldom change.
224180
9:37 a.m  I am an early morning person.  Interesting research you have going here!  I would be curious of your findings.  Do you think the tendency of the mother would have anything to do with it?  If she was a morning or evening person?
116589
recessive features are passed through family trees as "traits"; people who are heterogenous for the feature and their phenotype shows the dominant feature but they carry the recessive feature into their offsprings.
516632
The type of trait you are talking about would not be developed yet.\nAs far as their personalities now and if they had any of those in the womb...then I would have to say Mary Kate....saw an article that said when they needed the character on Full House to be smiling or laughing they used Mary Kate...so the outgoing side of her would cause survival, but on the other side of the coin the same nature would cause her to be nurturing....\nAlso, did I not read that one of them is a vegetarian? Seriously.