If you really want to have detailed answers on these subjects, could you go to my msn space http://spaces.msn.com/misperceptionsofislam/ and tell me whether it's convincing? You don't need to read all the topics mentioned, just the ones you're interested in.
214232
I will take a look at it.
676295
I'm normally 'up' on stuff like this but this one has slipped by me mostly. I'm going to try to catch up on research of it this week. Thanks for reminding me.
131677
Yes.. I read some of the link, but I have studied the JW's so much that I may know more about them than they do.  The false translation of their Bible, and many others.  The poor people have been decieved and just don't know it.  I spent enough time with one of their teachers that he almost converted as he could see that I had the answers that he didn't.
353195
hi there.\n\nput criticism texts in your search engine...........loads of different permetations come up... some may be helpful.
369526
Nice rant.....\n\nShould I address all of the fallicies one by one or will it be okay for me to just say that your 'facts' are questionable at best and some are plain wrong.\n\nBut alas, the selective memory and closed mind of liberals is at work again.
438367
Those are GOOD questions.\n\nYou may be enlightened by considering some of the information to be gleaned by browsing the link below:
159210
Yes, possibly, see link, other answers hear appear to be wrong.
20541
True. \n\nI could go into a lot here, but instead I'll give ya the link so you can learn a bit more on the subject yourself.
339171
I suggest you guys try and ignore this mouthbreather.  He asks the same questions on Judaism over and over again, with slightly different (though consistently biased and misleading) wording. If you don't believe me, all I can say is that you can verify this for yourselves.  I sincerely doubt that he is here to learn anything, at least in this area (though I feel obliged to at least commend him on his appropriate choice of screenname).\n\nThis guy's online hobby is something called Jew-baiting.  So don't take the bait, as it were, by responding on his terms and lending legitimacy to his line of questioning (which is shallow and insensitive at best, or, more likely from what I've seen, deliberate bigotry).  He has a real problem with Jews.  I don't know if it stems from a negative personal experience with Jews, or if he was raised by klansmen, or what.  But he keeps asking these same questions, and when confronted with information that contradicts his assumptions, he becomes belligerent and disregards the new information anyway.\n\nI once explained to him that he was mistaken in his assertion that a Jew had to have "Jewish blood" because conversion has a history going back through biblical history, all the way to the first Hebrew himself.  This did not sway him in his irrational belief.  And if someone here were to point out that calling Judaism a "cult of ancestor worship" is inaccurate because\n\na) it's not considered a cult\n\nand\n\nb) worshipping anything other than G-d, one's ancestors included, is the most severe form of blasphemy according to Judaism\n\nI highly doubt this gentleman would be swayed on either point.  My advice is not to waste your time.  There are plenty of people on here asking questions about Judaism because they actually want to learn.  If you are qualified to answer, answer those people.  They'll actually benefit from it.
442591
I don't think I would be helping you if I just handed you the answers.  I would recommend using Wikipedia as a starting place.  There is a lot of good information, including the answers to your questions.
627232
They have an "About" page that explains what it's all about. However, I had to read it more than once, and STILL am not 100% able to explain it. It looks very "busy" and confusing. *chuckle* But I'd advise giving the page a try. The link is below.
430125
very good!! you are starting to see the errors of your ways.  Fuzzy logic doesn't really hold true, that's why Science has to rule out the Bible as a credible source for anything.\n\nPEACE!  and have a GOOD day!
239632
Have you been to www.icr.org ? They have a lot of facts that hard to ignore. If you can disprove them, I would be interested in seeing your rebuttal.
211495
I think the site is very interesting. Conservative Christians believe the bible is the word of god, which is obviously not true, as people here have said, there is a difference between the old and new testiment... therefore they ignore parts of the bible, so people DO ignore some of gods words! I have always wondered how people decided what parts of the bible they to ignore and what parts they follow... and have posted a lot of questions about that.. no one has an answer, they say you feel it in your heart or through god... all this explains why in the past Christians were so racist and destroyed so many cultures... and why they are homophobic now. They are affraid to even question the bible, but by ignoring things (like the old testiment) they not only question, they judge and reject. The site is worth a read... as it comes to the conclusion.. lets just reject the lot!\nChristianity is like this weight dragged along by humanity, reinforcing old out dating philosophies. We drag them along.. and say to them... slavery is bad.. they argue its in the bible, its ok... then after time the accept, because its from society where they get their beliefs not the bible.
154491
Not completely. One should never trust only ONE source of information. They may not have every fact on the subject and a single view can be biased. Try a few different sources and get a more well rounded take on it.
392528
The last I read, it is not like back in the day. Keep it tight, as close to the page content as possible, no copy tricks and short. That is a short summary of 4 pages I read on the topic.\nGood Luck\n\ncannot recall the exact source or I would give you a link.\n\nDon't forget to vote for best answer for whomever
603831
Absolutely agree.  You produce unusually well-written questions (I've answered several of yours in the past few days).  You have a concise question as a subject, followed by just enough details to indicate what it is you really want to know.\n\nEven though I'm a writer, spelling and grammatical errors don't bother me too much (I realize that many people are non-native English speakers ... and some people have great ideas, but have trouble with typing or grammar).\n\nI admit that sometimes the idiotic questions really get me going.  When someone starts with a bad premise, or uses glaringly faulty logic, I try to point it out (gently, if I can muster it).\n\nAnd sometimes it's other *answers* that get me to respond.  When someone writes a perfectly valid question and gets flamed ... or when six people all respond with the same *wrong* answer (like "Sedna is the 10th planet" or "carbon dating is how we date fossils"), I feel compelled to answer.  Somehow quashing misinformation is as important as providing good information.\n\nOther pet peeves:\n- A statement with a question mark after it ... doesn't make it a question.\n- A short question followed by a long list of unrelated questions, each of which deserves a page of reponse.\n- A description that's essentially a long diatribe indicating that the asker has no interest in any answer at all.\n- A question that has only been asked about 200 times.  Don't people pay attention to the "previously asked questions" that comes up as you type a question in?  I may barf the next time I see "chicken or egg?" or "why is sky blue?"\n- A *stupid* question that has only been asked about 200 times. Why do creationists think "why are there still monkeys?" is *incredibly* clever, no matter how many times responders demonstrate that it is incredibly stupid?\n- Questions copied ver batim from web sites.  When the Asker can't be bothered to write his/her own question, then it's a sure sign they won't bother reading the answers.\n- (Related to this.)  Long answers copied ver batim from web sites.  Please, just put the link.\n- Askers who ignore the ten people who submit detailed answers to their questions, and then reward "I dunno" from a friend as the "Best Answer" (usually with five stars).