June 2006: Final at Roland Garros. It's raining!!! The finalists Amelie Mauresmo and Maria Sharapova decide to do some armwrestling. Who is gonna win?
199671
Definitely Amelie Mauresmo, coz., its like Maria Sharapova Vs a Man.  Well, i love Mauresmo at the end.
614666
of course MARIA SHARAPOVA!!!!!!!!!
541051
Amelie Mauresmo won the WTA Championships in 2005, and, since ranking points won in WTA tourneys are kept for 52 weeks, she thus had 485 "points to defend." Normally, this would mean that Amelie could not gain any points at the same tourney this year, but for some reason the ranking points for this years WTA Championships were increased, giving the champ 525 points instead of last year's 485, so Amelie could have 40 more points in the Nov 13th rankings.\nThe victory by Martina Hingis over Nadia Petrova on Wednesday guaranteed that Justine Henin-Hardenne would finish no lower than third in the "Yellow" group at the Championships. This alone would be enough for Justine to edge out Amelie for the # 1 ranking, and thus Amelie could not finish the year at # 1.\n # 2 Maria Sharapova was in a somewhat better position. She had only 218 "points to defend," and might have finished the year at # 1 by simply matching her performance of last year in reaching the semis--if Justine Henin-Hardenne had finished last in her round-robin group. But with her win over Nadia Petrova on Thursday, Justine clinched a place in the semifinals. That meant that Maria would have had to win the tourney to have a chance at finishing # 1. Justine's victory over Maria in the semis eliminated that possibility, and clinched the # 1 ranking for Justine.\nJustine Henin-Hardenne, who reached all 4 Grand Slam tourney finals this year, entered the tourney in the best position to finish the year at # 1. Maria Sharapova's loss in the semifinals (which happened to be a loss to Justine) meant that even if Justine had finished 3rd in her group, rather than reaching the final, she would have finished the year at # 1 anyway.
604556
Kournikova, of course. I don't get it what's all the fuss around Sharapova. She is very good player, OK but their are much more sexy and good-looking tennis players than her. The other thing I don't get about tennis appearances is why Kouznecova have to show herself that often on commercials....She is a bit scary.....
48471
Amelie Mauresmo is openly gay and in a relationship with her girlfriend.\nIn 1999,  Mauresmo reached the Australian Open final with wins over three seeds (including world No. 1 Lindsay Davenport), before falling to world No. 2 Martina Hingis, who after the final infamously called Mauresmo, who is lesbian, 'half a man'. Though she lost in the final to Hingis, she soundly defeated Hingis later in the year, en route to the final of the Paris event.\nhere is a link if you want to know a little more about her:\nhttp://www.ameliemauresmo.fr/en/
225503
Sorry, missed it,\nI was at the extreme underwater dragon riding pudding toss championships.\nXenji Nyonsonmanzicizichimanschlecher- 12.327 def.\nThe Baron Jacque Herman Gustof Gustov Tinkerman- 11.169
167950
Ginepri is playing well and Sampras has not played a match in a long time. However don't ever underestimate the abilities of Sampras. I mean he has won 14 grand slams. Come on. It could be a good match if Sampras is in shape, otherwise Ginepri is able to win.
503474
Tyra Banks vs Naomi Cambell\n\nOsama Bin Laden vs Saddam Hussein
126910
Serena Williams vs Michael Jackson.\nBoym will she crush him!!
635408
I like Sharapova, I hope she could win again. \nBut Henin-Hardene is in good shape, too ... and she just won a couple of other tournaments just before Wimbledon.\n\nI watched Venus Williams' match last night, against another US player, Mattek. Easy win for Venus.
478054
If Roddick continues to play the way he does on Hard surface, he has a really good chance of defeating Nadal. You know, i would really like to see Nadal and Blake face off. Blake has beaten Nadal every single time on Hard surfaces. It should be interesting. Can't wait.
605485
I am clapping my hands!IIt is so fun to play AND watch! I prefer watching women's tennis to men's because after 2 hours or so, it gets tedious. My favorite women's player is Martina Hingis and men's is Roger Federer. I don't play at a club, but I am starting next month with lessons. (I still play for fun though)
69737
what the hell does this have to do with tennis?
656439
moi aussi je me pose la même question. au 1er set j y ai cru reelement. J'adore federer et je suis sure qu il sera en pleine forme pour gagner roland garros en 2007!
364045
Hahahahaha\n\nTo give you an idea of the difference in skills.  When Venus was #1 she played the #80 guy in the world and lost.  That tells you how Fed will beat Sharapova 6-0, 6-0.\n\nP.S.  In the battle of the sexes the guy was 40 and played with a handicap.  Only got one serve (ie fault = double fault)  A prime male athlete will beat a prime female athlete because of the difference in strength and speed.
341623
it is ronnie alcano, filipino vs ralf souquet, german, in the final but you are right most of the quarterfinalists were asian mostly filipino and taiwanese
75379
Hello???? R u ok? Martina is back! She's playing really well this year. She's very consistent in all the Tournaments that she entered in. Although not yet a winner this year, she had already made the Quarterfinal at the Australian Open, Finals at Tokyo, and a number of semi-finals and quaterfinals. I think as far as i can remember, of all the 7 tournaments that she entered, she only have one First round loss and that's against Henin. All of the other results are either a quarterfinalists, semi-finalists, or a finalist. That's not bad for a comebacking player, i mean that's Awesome. \nTo add to it, from a Ranking of 400 or more at the start of the year, she is now ranked 27 in the world. I bet after the year ends i will not be suprise to see her at the top 5 in the world.