runs may include no ball, overthrow etc.
199303
There are plenty of instances of bowlers conceding more then 10 runs from combinations of no-balls and wides.  Ryan Sidebottom playing for Yorkshire once conceded 11 runs from a single delivery with five wides and a six.  See the bbc link to the article below.  \nThe second link is an article that claims a 10 run delivery in 1900 and at least nine instances of 9 runs, mostly from overthrows.  It is possible for an inexperienced team to keep giving overthrows.\nThere is also a record of a player being awarded 7 runs after the batsmen ran three and the fielder deliberately kicked the ball over the boundary line, the umpire awarded an additional 4 runs.  See the third link below.\n\nIn a ODI game against India in 2004 Naved-ul-hasan has this memorable over conceding 17 with only 1 legal delivery bowled (source cricinfo, see last link below):\n Naved-ul-Hasan comes into the attack, replacing Shoaib Akhtar\n  10.1 Naved-ul-Hasan to Sehwag, (noball) FOUR, outside off, short width given Sehwag takes it and punches past mid off to the fence\n  10.1 Naved-ul-Hasan to Sehwag, (noball) FOUR, long hop - put away in fine style, rocks back and pulls it hard - four!\n  10.1 Naved-ul-Hasan to Sehwag, (noball) no run, another noball, plays and misses outside off\n  10.1 Naved-ul-Hasan to Sehwag, no run, on the stumps, defended back\n  10.2 Naved-ul-Hasan to Sehwag, (noball) FOUR, OH! dear another no ball, hits it over mid off, four more!\n  10.2 Naved-ul-Hasan to Sehwag, (noball) no run, bouncer and umpire called a noball\n  10.2 Naved-ul-Hasan to Sehwag, FOUR, fuller length, smashed away past mid off for a boundary\n  10.3 Naved-ul-Hasan to Sehwag, two runs, full and on legs, whipped away to deep mid wicket\n  10.4 Naved-ul-Hasan to Sehwag, no run, short in length, tries to cut and gets beaten\n  10.5 Naved-ul-Hasan to Sehwag, no run\n  10.6 Naved-ul-Hasan to Sehwag, one run, pushed to cover and that is 50 for Sehwag
251925
A runner is NOT out if the ball first passes a fielder who has had a chance at fielding the ball.  The ball is alive and in play.
71087
No it's not possible. Even if bases were loaded and the at bat player flys out, the third runner is the third out and the batter (a fourth out, you could say) doesn't count - three outs ends any inning.
424463
Running Back drops, then recovers, no turnover, for him, one fumble, no fumble lost (That's the bad one).\n\nRunning back (Or whatever) fumbles, defensive guy recovers, runs, fumbles, offensive play recovers, two fumbles, two fumbles lost.
250775
It's not a run unless the bases were loaded.\n\nIn which case the player on third would score the run, not the batter getting the walk.
225667
Well I'm not sure but I think its called a dead ball and you have to re-bowl that ball. Or your just lucky and you got 4 runs out of it.
628011
Yeah, would be interesting to see how each team's attack and defense would go without each other, I mean if both teams were attacking at the same time, and the individual skill would count alot more too, since dribbling the defender could mean creating a gap on the opponent's flank.
29730
cricket...cricket...cricket...  there are no legitimate, Legal, moral arguements for this  stuff)
264594
The situation might change. For instance, if there is only one runner on third base and the pitcher balks, there is suddenly nobody on base. There isn't much reason to intentionally walk a guy at that point. Other than that, I can't really imagine a time when you might do this.
154590
NO BALL.\nIT NEVER CHANGED.
217186
well if its the same as baseball:\n\nif there is less than two out with runners on base, and a pop fly is hit in the infield, the batter is out, and the runners have to tag up.
624597
It depends on the defensive scheme,  but bump and run is another popular one.  Most of them are just revisions from the teams base defense though.
206061
In a game of cricket, there are 12 players per side. But only 11 players can bat and/or bowl. The 12th player, usually called "12th man" is just a substitute player. He can only field.\n\nScoring:\n6 runs : If the ball crosses the boundary rope directly without touching the ground it is a sixer\n4 runs : If the ball crosses the boundary rope after pitching in the ground it is a boundary\n1,2,3.. runs can be run before the fielder picks the ball and hits the stumps.\nIf the ball missed the stumps and rolls away, the batsmen can run again. This is called overthrow.\nThe other ways of runs\n1 run for a noball and wide\nlegbyes and byes\n5 runs if the ball hits the fielding side helmet, kept behind the keeper
24442
This may be weak, but here goes.  Bases loaded, batter hits up the middle but three runners run outside the base path? or possibly three runners interfere with the infielders?
191931
Wow, so many answers and none of them correct, no one has answered how to win a match by zero wickets.  \n\nIn the example given a couple previous answers are correct, the run would count, the wicket would not count, the batting team would win by 1 wicket.  Lords holds the laws of cricket.  \n\nLaw 24 (no balls) states:\n12. Penalty for a No ball\n"A penalty of one run shall be awarded instantly on the call of No ball. Unless the call is revoked, this penalty shall stand even if a batsman is dismissed. It shall be in addition to any other runs scored, any boundary allowance and any other penalties awarded."\n\nAnd under law 25 (wide ball)\n"5. Penalty for a Wide\nA penalty of one run shall be awarded instantly on the call of Wide ball. Unless the call is revoked (see 3 above), this penalty shall stand even if a batsman is dismissed, and shall be in addition to any other runs scored, any boundary allowance and any other penalties awarded."\n\nNow as to whether the wicket would count.  Law 21 (The Result) states:\n"6. Winning hit or extras\n(a) As soon as a result is reached, as defined in 1, 2, 3 or 4 above, the match is at an end. Nothing that happens thereafter, except as in Law 42.17(b) (Penalty runs), shall be regarded as part of it. Note also 9 below."\n\nTherefore the wide or no-ball would count but the wicket would not as it came after the result.  Similarly if a batsman is on 98 and the scores are tied they need a boundary to get to 100, they cannot run 2 as the result is reached after the first run.\n\nThe only way a team can win with zero wickets is also covered by law 21:\n"7. Statement of result\nIf the side batting last wins the match without losing all its wickets, the result shall be stated as a win by the number of wickets still then to fall.\nIf the side batting last has lost all its wickets but, as the result of an award of 5 penalty runs at the end of the match, has scored a total of runs in excess of the total scored by the opposing side, the result shall be stated as a win to that side by Penalty runs."\n\nPenalty runs are awarded due to unfair play.  There are only three instances where a fielding side can give away 5 penalty runs during an over: 1)  deliberate distraction or obstruction of the batsman second infringement.  However the wicket will not count so they will in fact win by 1 wicket.  2)  Fielder does damage to the pitch.  Afridi was guilty of this recently.  3)  Match ball condition is changed, plenty of instances of this happening.  \n\nAt the end of a match if a team has lost by less then 5 runs and they find TV footage of the fielding team damaging the pitch or changing the condition of the ball they could apply for a 5 run penalty to win the match.  This would have to be done before the umpires meet with the scorers at the conclusion of the match.  Once the umpires and scorers agree on the correctness of the scores the result cannot be changed.
120295
the person who is on base get the credit for the run scored. in order to get credit you have to be on the base and not replaced by a pinchrunner
132396
capture the flag\n \nor any basic sports were you only need a ball...like soccer