I've spoken directly with Eisenhower's national security advisor (before he died in 1998); two other sources close to Presidents AND an ex_NASA Ground Test Astronaut over the last 2 years. My question has self evident answers, but what do YOU think?
201380
I know they are real..there certainly should be no question in regard to their true existence..I am sure that ..every one of the thousands and thousands of sightings YEARLY believe them as real as well. I have been wittness to them all my life.. even more now than ever before...there is no doubt whatsoever in my mind..I just cannot understand why we continue accepting these lies from all the world governments in regards to UFOs and extraterrestrials..they have been here for the entire history of Human civilization.
541430
We'll never know the truth-a lot of records needed are sealed until 2050. Seems there's something they don't want us to know. There's so many theories and I know someone did murder the President besides Oswald. To make it more confusing, I saw some stuff on LBJ-there's a video of his mistress of 20 years that was pretty believable. And documents to back that up. I know there were plenty that didn't like JFK and it was probably a combination of theories. The LBJ theory has a few points in its' favor. LBJ was part of a powerful wealthy group of mostly Texas Oil guys. Some interesting names that include Nixon. LBJ became president and the oil guys got some handsome oil subsidies that JFK wanted to get rid of. There are those(including McNamara, JFK's Defense secretary) that felt JFK would never have escalated Vietnam. To make it weirder,, Bobby Kennedy probably would have been President in '69 but was also assasinated, and Nixon became President instead. I'll watch the other video-seems big oil sure could've been a factor.
636796
No, be nice, but Reagan couldn't make it work. We're testing a system aboard a mod 747, and ground based systems, but nothing powerful enough yet to penetrate the atmosphere. Other anti-missile missile systems being tested for regional defense. Japan is partnered with us on that among others.
49549
I watched an old episode of "Unsolved Mysteries" recently and asked myself the same question.  From this show it came to appear that there was substantial evidence to prove that the Roswell Theory from back then via a private memo was adequate but never became public.  Within that memo it stated that there was subsequent evidence to believe that an alien force had landed and died from being ejected from the craft.  but it also stated too that the craft looked that to be that of a blown down weather balloon.  Now if it was a coverup by our government, one will never know unless you were either there back in 1947, can get close to where they actually have them hidden today, and know who did the covering up of the story to prevent it from being publicized.  Plus we don't really know if they are amongst us right now.  If by some odd chance they are, these beings are either like us in actions and emotion or they are just figmented imposters to impose our brains into a non ethical world of panic.  I am sure someday it will all be evident but until then keep your fingers crossed that someone tells the truth.
586762
Has anyone considered the possibility that he maybe sent them elsewhere (Syria?) to embarrass the administration? And why is it so far fetched to believe he had them? He did use them before, right? He also intentionally led other nations to believe he did have them to fend off exactly what we did, getting rid of him!
348507
probably no military as it seems all the retired ones disagree so strongly with Bush.  It is always interesting to see who gets on these things, but you can bet that someone like James Baker, Bush Sr.s man will be there to look after the boy.  Idiots got us in, and now we are supposed to be exited that this team of the same kind of "experts" are going to get us out.
246601
You commented :Could a huge conspiracy like that, which would involve thousands of people, really be kept secret!?\n\nThis should be the biggest evidence AGAINST a conspiracy theory, at least as it applies to a missile or something similar, blowing up the Pentagon instead of the commercial airliner.  The Pentagon is close to several busy traffic routes; these roads were packed with commuters at the time of the crash. There were thousands of people in the office buildings nearby. All of these people became eyewitnesses and if there were any conspiracy, they'd ALL have to have been in on it.  How could it be possible to get every single one of those people to play along?  I just don't get it.\n\nPS--- I was one of the thousands of eyewitnesses and I watched the plane actually hit the Pentagon and even though I've told people my story, they still cling to these conspiracy theories... go figure.
98372
UFO propaganda...Real or not, US took advantage of this issue to spy on Russia. It involves Starlin's death and why US only knows a little bit of Russia's future and direction after he died. This was the time when spy plane U2 evolved heightening the UFO issue. US tried to hide their U2 under this blanket of confusion until it got shot down by Russia 4 years into the program.
61527
Yes. Yes, yes, yes.\n\nOf all the things that people have made conspiracy theories out of, this has got to be one of the lamest. The moon landing hoax evidence is really lame.\n\nSo, yes.
266840
By sheer luck less than a half an hour ago I posted an entry to my blog talking about that ( http://sinthyia.blogspot.com/2006/05/our-fearless-leader.html ).  No, I don't think he is dumb and I think it is dangerous for people to dismiss him as that as well.
410624
Diplomacy should be exhausted before military action is ever taken against another country.  I think the art/science of diplomacy was alive and well until George Bush took office.  He's been thumbing his nose at other countries since he chose to completely disregard the UN before the war began, and he has taken that attitude throughout his whole Presidency, with not only the UN but other countries in general.  He has taken place in some diplomatic talks, but when it comes to actually listening and taking other country's plights or suggestions/desires into consideration he just doesn't bother.  I am hopeful we will experience a return to civil dialogue with other countries after he is finally gone in 2 years.  GW is the primary reason other countries have come to despise us at the level they do now.  I think if a President is elected in 2008 that is intelligent enough to understand the value of diplomacy we might have a chance to regain their respect and support.
322188
No, I don't think so, but that doesn't mean that someone isn't trying. That guy in Idaho is pretty wacko, but I have heard of a few things that OUR government/military have been doing in Alaska.  I've read and heard a few things about using microwave beams of natural radiation (basically microwaves directed at cloud formations and the Ionisphere) that change the winds in the upper and lower layers of the atmosphere, change some cloud formations, I believe by disapation, with the high concentration of the microwave energy (and it requires a huge amount of energy to power this beam, and also I don't know what the power source would be, but still it would require a ton of energy, to run this device, like having it's own power plant type of #'s), and the one other point is that the area that is effected by this microwave beam is very small and regionalized, probably just a few 10's of feet.  I've read a few things on the net, and of course there are conspiracy theories and all, but the US Govt have been interested in weather modification for a long time to use as a weapon of war, to help weaken the enemy, so it wouldn't surprise me to think that some form of this has got to be true. The person who controls the weather, will eventually rule the world, pretty heavy stuff, I know. So we may have some of the technology to do this, but it's on a very small scale. The guy from Idaho is crazy, but at the same time he is making alot of money off of this crap, with his internet sites and radio appearances. This guy used to be a tv weatherman, but then saw the dollar signs to do this, instead. Hmmm..., maybe I should do this?
492631
Well as a moderate dem, I don't know if you were able to catch any of former Pres. Carter's interviews yesterday on programs like the Diane Reams show and the News Hour on PBS.  He doesn't label it civil war.  He used some comparisons of some millions of deaths in other countries that have had civil wars last few years.  (the country names escape my recollection).  I agree with his point, though, he says it's civil strife for sure but regardless of the label it was a mistake to focus so much of our resources on Iraq and losing our focus in Afghanistan.  Well said.
285435
What is the question here? All I see is a lame-as sed rant about what you PERCEIVE to be true about the White House. I guarantee you there are a number of people on a daily basis saying "no". I haven't seen anyone get their head lopped off. And seriously, are you suggesting that it wasn't time for a new director of the CIA? LMAO. Get a clue.
149172
As The AURORA Is A Mystery To You \nThere Are MANY "BLACK PROGRAMS" Shielded In Mystery\nAnd Just As The AURORA Is Beginning To Reveal Itself \nMany More Will In The Future\nI Would Be Comfortable Saying That The Black Ops Programs Have Machines That Would AMAZE Anyone If We Were Able To See Them\nBut For Whatever Reason They Are Kept Hidden From The Public\nI Believe That The Aerospace Program Is Far More Advanced Than Many Of Us Would Be Willing To Admit\nAnd Slowly These Mysteries Will Come Out Of The Dark In The Future\n\nThe Truth Is Out There
110277
I have this video.  It is thought provoking.  Check out the one he (Alex Jones) put out about the Bohemian Grove.  That, too, is a secret sect that many of our presidents have belonged to as well as leaders from all over the world.  As for the Illuminati being a group of "intellectuals," that was said in The DaVinci Code and should not be taken as fact.  It was a wonderful web that Dan Brown weaved.  (I must say, though, I couldn't put that book down, very entertaining.)
634325
"...was nasa lying about neil armstrong going to the moon?..."\n\nNo, definitely not. It's unbelievable how many people prefer to accept the half-baked, erroneous "proofs" that show men never landed on the moon to the undeniable scientific facts that prove we did. Take the time to read the facts on this non-governmental website ==> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html\n\n"...the technology is much greater today than 1965, so why cant we go up there again?..."\n\nYes, our technology has greatly advanced since 1969, but at this time we simply don't have the necessary hardware to put men back on the moon---no Saturn-like boosters, no life-support systems required for manned lunar voyages, no lunar landing equipment, etc.,. It's true that we could build all the necessary equipment, but a number of factors discourage further manned lunar exploration--the space race is over, the American public has lost interest in the moon, and NASA's budget is far below the levels needed to ramp up again for manned lunar flights.