ive been looking on the internet, but its very confusing  oh and it should be the version from the bible
211126
acually, some signs of the end of the world are alot.\nbut i will tell u some.\n- more racism\n-more floods\n-more deaths\n-more unjustice & unpeace\n-more wars\n-more earth quacks
324258
A great deal of information can be found in the gospels of Matthew (starting with the birth of Jesus, in Matt 1:18),  Luke (starting in Chapter 1, specifically the birth is at 1:26) and John (starting in Chapter 1).\n\nThe gist of it is that the world fell into sin when Adam & Eve took from the forbidden tree & ate the fruit.  After that throughout the OT there were strict rules for how to deal or be cleansed of that sin.  Which included sacrifice.  In the NT the birth of Jesus was to be the perfect sacrifical lamb so that Jesus would pay the final price for all of our sins, no more sacrifices would need to be made, our sins would be paid for in full.  His death was that sacrifice.  Then he rose, joined God in heaven until he returns one last and final time.\n\nI have never heard any such phrase as "Here I am, I'll go bring man back under your grace".  That just sounds like interpretation of scripture, as I couldn't find anything in scripture that was similar to it in wording.\n\nThe entire Bible supports this information.
646177
hmmmm, this will be good!!\n\nFor: GINEVRA1WEASLEY, how is he pulling things of contexts when it's from your very own Bible? 32 (Bible) Scholars couldn't get it right and I doubt that you'll be able to get it right..
625216
Yup I do and its funny in a weird sort of way how people will adapt what is in the Bible to suit their own needs. The book hasnt changed in a few thousand years I doubt its going to any time soon. Its all a matter of personal interpretation I guess but it shouldnt change every time you read it or speak about it to someone if you are a person of your convictions then it will stay the same.
163939
the bible is rewritten a lot\nit was changed a lot\n\nits now FALSE\nif you need evidences \njust contact
219059
http://jamaat.net/muh-christ/intro.html\nthis can help you
209446
King James \nhuh\ngo to see this site plz \nhttp://www.ahmed-deedat.net/modules.php?name=tapes&op=mydown&did=6\nthis is abt bible \n& its another part\nhttp://www.ahmed-deedat.net/modules.php?name=tapes&op=mydown&did=5\n\nyou can also conact me @\naimooon87@yahoo.com
463796
haha, maybe that bible has some DIRECTION as to where to find downloads. \n\nOh wait, downloads aren't in the bible so they must not EXIST!
472931
have you tried bible.org.  sometimes if you word it differently that could help you find it as well.  Blueletterbible.org works too
95301
First off nowhere in the scripture does it say that it went out with the disciples or apostles. Secondly if you are a child of GOD you are a disciple of CHRIST...So as long there are children of GOD there are disciples. Thirdly it says unknown tongue, if Peter would have spoke in a foreign language only the person of that tribe or nationality would have understood. Uknown tongue is exactly what it means a tongue that can not be learned or taught, but only by the Holy Spirit...Why cant we take the word for what it says. Lastly the NIV version is hypocritical because they take alot of the important scriptures out. The Bible says to not take away or add to. For example John 5:1-5 which is talking about the pool of Bethesda in the KJV it goes in order from verse 1-2-3-4-5 ETC... But in the NIV it goes 1-2-3- oops 5 where is verse 4, hmmm want me to show you what verse 4 says "For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had." So basically the NIV is taking the power of GOD completely out of the picture. Tell me again why is the KJV wrong...Seems to me the KJV is right and the NIV is wrong....
195297
There were a bunch of books left out of the Bible. Mostly this was done to maintain consistancy. You can read some of them at my link. I have read most of the ones on this page and there is little "new" information.
573596
<squeeee>  Where'd you get *that bible??  I want one too!!  The bible I read didn't say cool stuff like that.  drat.  I was robbed!
571918
You are very right.  When people cut things out of the Bible, they start with Rev  22:18.  ; )  But almost everyone actually just chooses which things to follow, there are VERY few groups that obey everything in the Bible (keeping kosher, not eating shellfish, not allowing men to have long hair, treating their slaves well, etc.).  Really it's all just a buffet.
70688
I agree and this is one of the most difficult issues that I have been struggling with lately.  Our ancestors of 2000 years ago did not have the science nor the technology to explain everyday events.  "Oh my gosh!  That glowing ball is back!  It must be a god!"  So, they named him Helios.  I'm just so confused as to why the Bible is still the end all, be all authority.  We've obviously made leaps and bounds in our understanding of the earth, our solar system, our galaxy and our universe.  Ugh!  I'm just so confused and find it VERY hard to follow with blind faith.
281932
Revelation 12:11. (A Google search or a concordance would have helped you, too.)
17299
where do you find what in the bible?  This question doesn't make any sense.
549657
The best way you can find out what the bible says in "real terms" is to read it in Hebrew. That is the original language  it was written in. I find it useful when reading to have The Exhaustive concorance of the Bible near by.