i remember watching a movie in my history class about this, there was a child too young to take his parents throne and there was this guy who took the throne for him until the child was old enough to take it over, i need this for a paper im writing if you can help he it would be great! thanks!
218093
The guy who takes over the throne is called a regent.  It happens a lot.  In English history, the following princes have had regents during their minority.\n\nHenry III\nHenry VI\nEdward V\nEdward VI\n\nFor French history\n\nPhilip I\nLouis IX\nCharles VI\nCharles VIII\nCharles IX\nLouis XIII\nLouis XIV\nLouis XV
161185
Here's an ironic situation - Kidnappers take a child with the intent of obtaining a large ransom from his rich parents.  The  child turns out to be so unruly that the kidnappers end up begging the parents to take the child back.\n\nBTW, this has been done previously by O. Henry.
558691
Society has allowed the children to take control.  Their is a reason children are not supposed to be in control, it is because they lack self control and are selfish.  Children are not supposed to be told no today, if you do they lose control and do what children do, have tantrums.  \n\nSo many things are wrong with this picture, but parents need to learn to take back control, very soon.  Blessings.
50725
I would suggest reading the book "Vengeance" by George Jonas, the factual book that the movie was based on.  I haven't read it myelf, so I can't give you a direct answer, but the book should explain who and what they are.
221628
there prity much has always been child labor. But it was usaly just parents working there kids on the farm or something.\n\nI think you might wana check but the actual earlest I can think of where children where used as labor force by some one other than there parets... I think some slave children where used as servents in egypt, not 100% sure though.
268179
I did find one article on the role of authority figures.Hope this helps.\n\nAll the best.
156054
Here are a cuple places with summarysand then my summary\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Silver_Chair\n\nhttp://www.macrobee.de/version2/article.php3?id_article=74\n\nTwo children, Eustace and Jill, are picked to save the prince's life from the evil witch. They are sent to Narnia, the magical place out of this world, by Aslan, the king of all Narnia. Aslan sends them there so that they would travel to the other side of Narnia into the witch's palace and defeat her, so they can have the prince back. \nEustace and Jill overcome huge obstacles, but in the end make it to the palace. When they reach the palace, the witch is waiting for them, waiting to kill them. She has her army try to kill them but Aslan comes and rescues them. As he fights them off, the children run inside and take the prince. The prince is free, and Aslan kills the witch.
247325
Can you be more specific? What question are you asking? If it is about a son who is 23, but is living on welfare and food stamps, while many young men are fighting for their country, remember he learned from the people who raised him, his values, his morals and his actions were taught.... \nNo where in any piece of literature does it say that life is fair. We all have to make choices. Instead of judging other peoples choices, perhaps we need to judge our own in order to better understand someone else's choice.
594955
I think first it depends if the monarchy will even be around when William assumes the throne.  As it has been mentioned, the Queen could live to be as old as her mother did, and that means we might have to wait a long time before William is King.  I do not see anything wrong with William giving his mother royal status again, that would be a nice way to honor her, especially since she will be the late King's mother and she should be afforded all the perks and pomp that goes along with it, even in death.
554099
You might learn a lot from this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonization\nI think the borders were more a part of the monarchy's decision to allow for different parties to control different areas as they gradually made their way on to the continent
643119
Et tu' Brute? You can always start off with that and lead in to whatever you're going to talk about on him. What is your subject besides him. are you going to speak about his rule? His rise to power? The play by Shakespeare?\n\nHere's another lead-in. \n\nGeneral, polotician, god? Only one man in history could be all three. He rose to the power of a king in a republic, without violence to secure his rule. He then transformed that republic into an empire, one of the greatest empire's known to man. [No, this is not Emporer Palpatine, this is Julius Ceasar]*\n\n*Add this last part in only if you know your teacher is lax with things like this.....\n\n(Why does that look like it's describing Star Wars?)
518302
The movie is about a set of twins (both roles played by DeCaprio). When they were born, the King told the Queen that one died and he placed that child in a "protected place" with a caregiver. The King believed this was a way of protecting the throne. \nOnce the King died, his son took the throne and was not liked by the people. He was a bad king (to say the least). Eventually this new king discovered that his brother never died, so he had him imprisoned in an iron mask to conceal his face/identification from the public. He did not want to share the throne. \nDuring his father's reign, there were four main muskateers which protected the royal family.\nThree of these men quit because they no longer believed in the new King's ways of ruling. The only one that remained was Dartangon. He had now become the King's right hand man. The other Muskateers could not understand why he would not defect like them. \nWhat the King did not know was that one of the defective Muskateers knew of his brother's, the other twin's, placement into the mask. This Muskateer comes clean and tells the other two. They form a plan to "break" the young man out of prison and to educate him in the ways of royalty and switch him with his brother during a royal party. (You see, no one else knows there are two children.) All goes well, until Dartangon realizes there is a change in the personality of the King. He catches on and finds there are two children. \nThe catcher is that he, Dartangon, is actually the father of the twins. He was having an affair with the Queen, who is still alive and very much in love with him too. He had been hiding the secret for years. He comes clean to the other Muskateers and they finnaly realize why he would never defect, eventhough he agreed the King was an awful King. \nThe King tries to kill his brother and all four muskateers are trying to protect the good twin. There is a "showdown" and the King accidently stabs Dartangon, his father, and kills him. With his dying breath his tells the twins he is there father. ALL of the Muskateers here this and are sworn to secrecy by the creed and they decide to put the King into the mask and his brother on the throne. The good twin is now King and places the bad twin into a nice seclusion with a deaf, blind mute so the secret will not be out. France is happy again and Dartangon is a hero muskateer.
150857
In 1408 a czech guy named Huss protested against the catholic church saying it had strayed from the letter of the law, ET is an allegory for the life of Christ (yeah, I'm not kidding). Maybe there could be a connection there? Good luck,
51108
you should go to either sparknotes.com, cliffsnots.com, or pinkmonkey.com one of them should help you
432539
First of all, it does not say that these were chldren, just the kings sons.  Perhaps some were children.   You have to understand about bloodline to get this-  God's people were under opression-  God gave them the means to be free from that oppression, sometimes war and death is necessary.  History just repeats itself with the descendants of the oppressor taking up the throne and makingthings worse.  This is a picture of sin in the physical-  if every remnant of that sin is not wiped out, it will just come back and take over again-  God commanded that the entire bloodline of those that refused to submit to His authority or at the very least respect His people and let them live in peace be wiped out or it would come back to haunt them.  \nI will not even go into the explanation of understanding Hebrew words and concepts to explain "thou shalt not kill"  I am sure you have heard it and if you continue to reject it because it does not fit in with your ideals , it does not make it any less true.   Either way , what is true is that either by the laying down of all arrogance or because you have no other choice- every knee will bow and every tongue will confess - there will be no room for, and no way to deny the majesty of God!\nThere is no contradiction,  His ways and thoughts are not my ways and thoughts-  I was not there at the foundations of the earth and I had no part in hanging one star in the heavens and neither did you.
50936
The Sultans play more of a "ceremonial" role- Very similary to the Queen of England.  In England, parliment and the Prime Minister make the decions but the Queen and the Royal Family serve as a figure head.
256205
This sounds too much like someone's homework!\n\nThe period is far to wide to narrow down any of the categories you want info in.  Perhaps you should actually look it up in some books - you know, actually do some research!