I only need a couple of sentences. I have tried to read this thing and make sense of it but am having no luck. What I understand makes sense and I cannot think of any objections, but what I don't understand would be silly to use. Please help!
217034
i am too tired to help you tonight ( final tomorrow)\nBUT\nyou can\n1. google search and maybe you'll find some philosopher's corner\nor \n2. check w/ your school library... and see if there's electronic collections on encyclopedia of philosophy....\nthose are very helpful ( i was saved by those... )\ncheers
306763
Your sentence structure is passive.  To make it active, make the subject of the sentence the administrators and people of the community instead of "the reason," which merely "is."  For example: "Administrators and people of the community hear the same laundry list of complaints from industry leaders in the community," or whatever it is your "reason" is.\n\nGood luck.
512340
This is a cumbersome sentence. Not hard, but just very awkwardly written. Let's analyze it methodically:\n\nThe verb here is "originated", and the simple subject is "interest". So some interest originated - who is interested in what, and where did it originate from? That's what the rest of the sentence expresses.\n\n"EU" (European Union) and "in biofuels" (fuels from biologial products) modify interest, so it implies that the EU is interested in biofuels.\n\n"from agriculture" - agriculture is the business of farming.\n\nIn other words, "The European Union mainly got interested in biofuels because of the farming industry."
590027
Click this link for a thorough explanation.\n\nHope it helps. :)
366233
It has been years since I had to do sentences like these, and I just did these off the top of my head, so no guarantees:\n\n1) ille tyrannus scelerosus non diu conservat capita huius civium.\n2) Magnus est vigor artium OR magna est vis artium.\n3) Uxor sua stabat illic c um amicis suis et faciebat illud patientia.\n4) Cicero sensit et dixit idem super vita sua et natura mortis.
100433
I take back my rude attitude! I am sorry for being so rough in my answer earier. It is really really amazing after I went through the whole thing! I thought I was just wasting my time to read and solve something. Anyway, thanks for this lesson. I promise not to judge anything before I completely get to understand it. This is how it read:\n\n"I couldn’t believe that I could actually understand what I was reading. The phenomenal power of the human mind, according to a research at Cambridge University, it doesn’t matter in what order the letters in a word are, the only important thing is that the first and last letter be in the right place. The rest can be a total mess and you can still read it without a problem. \n\nThis is because the human mind does not read every letter by itself, but the word as a whole. Amazing huh ? Yeah. and I always thought spelling was important !\n\nIf you can read this, pass it on !"\n\nThanks! By the way,\n\nI ma psasing ti on ot ym futuer geneartoin... ah ah ah...
140391
I am not familiar with that piece of literature, but it suggests to me that the character had to figure out how to solve a problem, but only had a minute and a half to do so before some disaster happens.  I would have to see it in context to help you better.  Also, the word should be "lasts," not "last."
352182
It is not a sentence...\n\nBeneath the noted universal concerns there lies a distinctive world view.\n\n Or better yet use a semi colon after the word preceeding but ..then replacing it with however and a comma...like this \n\n" ; however, beneath these universal concerns there lies a distinctive worldview."
599553
This part is a bit more problematic than the first, because you switch between topics instead of focusing on specific ones. The specific example of Medan is a good one (if it's true) but the sentence following it makes little sense and doesn't connect to Medan at all. Then, from talking about the students in your town you suddenly switched to schools built by the government (and it should be "and by private sources" or something to that extent instead of "also by the non-government, too) - which is a good thing to include, but shouldn't be there.\nYour last paragraph is good.
243591
GOD! I just wish I could understand what you said....your english is very difficult to undertand darling, I am sorry i wish I could help you....try using comas when there is needed so the other person who is reading will understand better. this is for next time you ask something you may have better luck!\nI am not a great writer since english isnt my first language either so dont feel bad..
472581
Your question is inconprehensible. Although it is legible, because you can read it, it doesn't make any sense.
513911
it's just a summary..dont be afraid. its basically the way you understand the concept.maybe you can throw in your own little example.
91825
I sent you an email today. You got back to me but I dont understand so can you rewrite it for me?\n\n\nWell, actually Im not sure what these sentences mean because it make nonsence at all but I try to figure out, hope this translation could help you!
425951
I think it means you have to write one defintion but 2 lines long (they probably want more than one word).\nThats what I would do, or did they ask for 2 definitions?
384023
you can only try to figure out the meaning based on where and how it's used in the context of the sentence.  If you're still stumped, take a guess of its meaning and go with it.  Don't spend loads of time trying to figure it out.
240189
can you elucidate it a little more please?
442569
Statement : I'm sure everyone at my workplace would get involved in the sewing competition I have organised!\n\nAnswer: Why not likely men.\n\nYou get it? The 'why' in front of the sentence is just a form of expression. To show that one disagrees.