According to the official story Flight 93 crashed after four passengers attacked the hijackers in an attempt to gain control of the airplane. For a plane that flew into the ground, Flight 93 left a rather widespread debris field. Investigators found a second debris field three miles away from the main crash site at Indian Lake, and a third debris field in New Baltimore, eight miles away. NTSB officials suggested that the debris at these distant locations blew there in the wind after the crash, but eyewitnesses at Indian Lake saw the debris falling out of the sky like confetti. One of the engines was 600 feet from the main debris field by some accounts and a mile by others. The eyewitness accounts are consistent with a missile strike and not with a plane being flown into the ground. Why will they not release details of what the black box told them? Why did Air Traffic Controllers in a Nashua Telegraph article report an F-16 was circling Flight 93 and was in visual range at the time?
201784
The film "Flight 93" will likely follow the media's portrayal of the event. Personally, it's a beautiful story of human courage, but it's simply implausible. All those people getting through on their cell phones? From an altitude of 30,000 feet? With all the conceivable cell phone traffic already on the airwaves generated by the days events? It's preposterous, but I would be well impressed if the forthcoming film would delve into these possibilities.
20287
Estimates of about 35 million pieces of debris are common.  Of these about 100,000 are in the square centimeter or larger size category, and NASA routinely tracks about 8,000.  People are good at throwing stuff away.  Shame we did not throw ot far enough away.\nI have personally viewed at least four or five of the biggest pieces.
444488
There was no plane hit the Pentagon.\nAccording to the official BTS statistics, flight AA77 did not fly that day.\n\nManufactured terrorism\nhttp://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/manufactured.html
161883
counterquestion: (will you ask it for me?) why where the planes that crashed into the towers only filled up 1/5. not one of the airlines would have taken of with so few people on board. at least they say so.
42887
This is one of those nutty conspiracy theories.  The satellite photo was takeng the day after the attacks.  It doesn't show much of anything that you can distiguish in any detail.  For all we know, they could have hauled debris away that might have hampered rescue efforts.  Who knows how much of the debris might be in the building?\n\nThe second photo was taken 3 days after the attacks.  Again, debris could have been removed to safety reaons, etc. And it isn't a vgood picture.  Debris could be in areas not shown on the photo like the courtyard area.\n\nThen of course there is the security tape showing the crash.  There is nothing new here, this is just someone who has too much time on their hands.\n\nAdded:\n\nYour question was "try this out and comment".  You posted a link to inconclusive photos that could be interpreted any number of ways.  You try to point to some vague conspiracy and a cover up with no supporting evidence.  How do you think people are supposed to react?  You ask where the wreckage is and I provide a number of plausible explanations that you chose not to ignore and not to analyze.
282428
I have seen it several years ago. You can make a 7 foot hole with a 767 jumbo jet. One of the engines alone would make a larger hole that what the damage shows.
223751
Some parts landed an the far side from the entry points. The rest which was in the towers became an eternal part of building parts and the ash remains of the victims. I did see a part of a tail section and an entire engine in some pictures.
555759
Of those 67 times jets have been scrambled, 66 of them took place as a result of aircraft in offshore Air Defense Identification Zones, prior to 9/11 there were no domestic Air Defense Identification Zones.  \nAlso, it took and hour and 20 minutes to intercept Paynes Stewarts aircraft not 20 minutes, according to records of ATC radio transmissions, contact with the aircraft was lost at 0933:38 EDT, at 0952 CDT, a USAF F-16 test pilot from the 40th Flight Test Squadron at Eglin Air Force Base was vectored to within 8 nm of the aircraft, note the time zone change.
418366
wow...in 1968 i watched what appeared to be a shiny metallic piece of  crumpled metal tumble towards earth for 10 minutes, it was probably space debris or toilet ejecta from a passing airliner.what you seen was likely hardboard insulation like they use on construction sites, that stuff will fly a long ways with little wind....or else it was a runaway magic carpet
135781
I was at high school, the school tried to keep the events secret but all the students of history and other social sciences had TV and radios in their rooms and they watched the events as other students went on their way to classes ignorant of the events that was taking place. I was one of the ignorant. What did make it out though was rumours. My mom came and got me during my fifth period class after flight 93 went down. The school said it was under lock down but my mom was able to walk right into the building. The Gym teacher came down and got me to tell me that I was wanted in the office. I went to the office and saw mom there. She told me to go to my locker and get my things cause I was going home. So mom waited for me at the office. I didn't know what was happening, mom wanted to tell me when we were home but I figuered that it was bad. While I was at the locker, one of the school counselors walked by with an arm around a girl who was crying, I was able to catch what the counselor said to try to calm the girl, "I am sure that your father wasn't on that plane." It was then I started to panic. I hurried up with collecting my things. On my way back to the office, my one friend stopped me, and he told me everything what was happening. I didn't quite believe it. He went back to his class and I went to the office. On the way out, I told mom what I heard and she stayed silent so I stopped where I was and said "I will not go any further unless you tell me, if all that is true." She said it was and I started crying. We both feared that it was an invasion. The high school let out half way during the day. In flight time, the school was 5 minutes away from the crash site of Flight 93. I still cry when thinking about that day.
246408
The military does not control airspace.  This would be a local police problem, coordinated with the FAA.
436367
what i want to know is how did these hijackers infiltrate the pentagon and get them to turn of there defences . i is supposed  to be one of the most secure buildings in the world . there must have been more than one camera picking the pictures of the so called planes if i walk to my local shops i am picked by over 1 hundred cameras i live in a small town in England . it happened in Washington on of the most important city's in the whole world. its because American people a so gullible they can sell this lie to them. whats next.
385596
Any one who as seen the photos that were supplied to to the media  through various news outlets has to come to the sober conclusion that it was not a 737 airplane that hit the Pentagon.\n What is disturbing is why did they hold on to these videos for so long? Were their video experts "enhancing" it at the Pentagon all this time?
314139
1. Who knows (I think so) \n2. see #1\n3. Nobody knows\n4. They were kept hidden.  We aren't even sure if the black smoke was them.\n5. Nobody knows, but that could explain the hatch door getting to the beach... maybe there was no explosion\n6. Looked like northern russia - or at least sounded Russian, looked more like antartica - who knows???\n\nCAN'T WAIT TO FIND OUT!  BEST SHOW EVER!\n\nEdit: a couple other things that bother me:\n\nIf desmond crashed the plane totally by accident, what's with the coincidence of Desmond having encountered so many people from the plane in the previous years?  \n\n...and...\n\nWhat the hell is with that 4-toed statue??
42075
the interesting thing is when you examine both of the stories...If there were aliens that crashed in Rosewell, then it makes sense that the government would put forth some type of a more credable story then the weather balloon one. If there really was a weather balloon crash in Rosewell, then there wouldn't have been such a big deal made out of the whole thing... That would lead one to the conclusion that, whatever it was that crashed in Rosewell was of some importance to the government. I would believe that it was a secret millitary test flight that went awry. What other theories are there?
23818
It is very unclear just when he learned of the first hit. The timeline below has all of the reported times he was told with links to news stories referring to them. 1) 8:55, the situation room director, having learned of the crash in the motorcade, runs to the president's car and tells him then, 2) 8:55-9, Bush was told by Karl Rove while in the school hallways, but they think it's an accident, 3) 9:00, Rice tells Bush that the first plane hit, again think it was an accident, 4) 9:01, Bush saw the first plane hit, at a time after it hit, when no footage of the first plane was recovered until the next day.\n\nIt's all pretty bizarre, but not proof of a conspiracy.
616611
I may not be the brightest bulb on the string, but there are two simple questions that haven't been answered to my satisfaction. \n\nThe first, is had anyone seen the plane as it was headed for the Pentagon? Specifically, anyone on the freeway or nearby roads? Anyone from the nearby hotel? A low flying plane of that size would have made tremendous noise that should have made at least one person look up. I don't remember any stories or news accounts of at least one witness who would be eager to be on TV and talk about such an experience.\n\nSecondly, and I would think this is most important, the quote of the gas station attendant who says the FBI was there "in minutes after the crash" to grab the surveillance tapes. I do need the gentleman's exact definition of minutes, since the difference between two or three, as opposed to 20 or 30 would make or break the argument for conspiracy. I would fully expect the FBI to gather every piece of evidence available in the quickest manner, since at the time of the crash, the "who dunnit" list was supposedly wide open. However, if agents were gathering information literally minutes after the crash, that would raise and wave wildly every red flag. \n\nEven if the argument was made that the Pentagon was a foreseeable target, and agents were in place, why weren't non-essential employees in the Pentagon directed to areas of safety? \n\nThe Secretary of Defense was in the building, during a national emergency. If it was prudent to have FBI agents at the ready to seize video of an air assault on the Pentagon from a gas station, why was the Secretary, 6th in line to the throne, left to sit in his office, venerable to attack?  \n\nDedication to office? Nope...I just don't see that happening. Job and status guaranteed for 8 years? Might have been a gamble he offered to take...\n\nIt would explain why he didn't fall on his sword and resign, at the very least, to uphold the honor that is expected of anyone in command of the military after so many false claims of easy victory in Iraq.