Read the link first please...\nhttp://www.wroctv.com/news/story.asp?id=22255&r=l\nNow, how can this be right?  Doesn't that fall in the catagory of freedom of speech?  It protects hatemongers why then does she lose custody?  Doesn't this start a dangerous precident?  Should we REALLY go there?
200832
No we shouldn't.  But unfortunately in the times we live in there is to much religious sway.  Look at the supreme court.  Luckily the ACLU is involved and the woman will recieve legal counsel and wont have to pay out the rear end.  Its also good that the media, well one at least, is picking this up.  I'm sure other will be outraged.  Her rights have certainly been trampled on.  Not only in the fact that the reasoning behind the case is a mess, but the fact they had a court hearing without giving her due notice and while she is out of state is illegal.  \n\nThis is messed up on so many levels, all my positive energy and thoughts go out to this woman.  I'm sure justice will be done for this woman as more than one of her rights have been trampled on.  The right people have gotten involved anyway.  This is dispicable.
570575
What exactly does "false arrest" have to do with this senario?\n\nDo you believe that you know the real truth or only the alibi your neighbor is telling you?\n\n"What does she do now?" Only a fool doesn't recognize the need for a lawyer and a bigger fool comes here seeking legal advice.\n\nSeems there are 2 fools in this situation, she, and her nosey ill informed neighbor.
665322
I'd assume in order to sue them you'd have to prove they actually have put your family at risk.  If that's the case you could sue the VA for losing those veterns files even though they were returned.  It seems the goverment is the one who should be addressing what they've implied is a threat to "national security".  It's yet to be proven this was actually a threat aprart from the comments from a few goverment officials.  If you recall they made the same accusation with the first leak and did nothing.  So if it's true that the New York Times has repeatedly put us at risk prove it and do something about it.  It seems like more of that double speak regarding the "war on terror".  We are at war, we need special tools not provided by the current laws but it's a good idea to turn port management over to the UAE.  The New York Times has threatened our national security more then once and the Adminstration has yet to censure them with even a suspension of press credentials ?  I have to wonder if they believe it themselves and if it's not more dodge and weave.  Not to mention if the legality of the program could be challenged you can't classify an illegal program legally ?  It's a good question I wonder that myself.  I've added a link with some other headlines the times have run that really are more damming then this one it is a bit satrical.
299676
sounds to me like it wouldnt be very 'easy' for her to gain custody of the 13 yr old. she has a lot of things going against her like lying to the courts in the past about how many kids she has, how some dont even live with her besides this boy, etc. but its hard to say. i just hope that the boy is happy and loved where he is now and wont become a pawn
124207
She is a phoney and has been exposed as such.  It's a shame more people don't know about this.\n\nSee the website Skeptic.com and search her name.
606084
I'm not pissed because she spoke her mouth off. Good for him/her/it! We want people like her/it/him to speak. That's what liberalism is all about, being open minded.\n\nHe/she/it is confused, to say the least.\nIF we invade Arab nations, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity as he/she/it advocates we contradict what the President of these United States says.\n\nHe SAYS we're there to liberate, not to subjugate. \n\nWho's right, the Prez who runs the country or the lez/he/she//it thing who sells books? \n\nThey should duke it out! I put my money on the he/she/it because sociopaths are closer to psychopaths and I seen Psycho 'bout 10 times...\n\nHeard her new book is titled : Witchin' Accomplished!
486350
I agreee,that was actually very "cheap" and trashy of her. Actually what can you expect from somebody that walks BAREFOOT in a public bathroom.\n\nIts funny, people now days (well at least people like her)have not one shred of modesty or self respect.\n \nNow pinky dont be surprised that we get called "prudes" or "repressed" or God only knows what.\n\nI wonder what she's got to show after that, what can you do to TOP that? have a televised colonoscopy and pap smear at the same time?
132680
I think it's wrong.  It's on a par with Ann Coulter saying that someone should slip rat poison into Justice Stevens's creme brulee.  Sensible people can express political opinions without resorting to such hysterics.
190076
Hey all of you know it alls...I don't think she asked if he deserves the chair (which is just crass), or if he will continue making the same mistakes over and over.\nIn no way does this question call for a negative or derogatory opinion of any sort.\nHere's an idea...Maybe you should try to read the question first, think to yourself if you have any relevant in put, and if you don't, then it's just not your question to answer.\nTo all of you who answered as though you were God himself,  try not to be such an ignorant jerk in the future.\nAnd as for your question\nI think it's fabulous that you are trying to help your son through this very new and different time in his life.  Genuine people sharing their positive thoughts with your son will help the time pass, and in the process, he will make new friends, and be able to make better decisions in the future.  Unfortunately I do not know of anyone who would like to do this at the time, but maybe your son could find out if his particular prison offers a Pen Pals program.  I'm sure you'll have better luck with that, but I found a few sites that should be of some help to you\nGood luck, and I hope this helps!\n\nwww.friendsbeyondthewall.com\nwww.prisonpenpals.com \nwww.cellpals.com\nwriteaprisoner.com
536547
This is a difficult case with no easy answers. \n\nThe lawyer who represented Ms Campbell in court sums up the other side's case: \n"This was not a decision about custody. It was a decision on whether Mr Rana had acted improperly by violating the court order made at the Court of Session in Scotland in June last year." \n\nFor arguments for both sides: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/highlands_and_islands/6192406.stm\n\ncc
520767
I honestly think that is it all about publicity. You think that she would do better to safegaurd her personal and family life.
545118
She could have used someone else's. Some relatives will loan out their social security cards to family members so they can work. If it simply was a fake, they probably did know, as many employers know that they are hiring an illegal. They just look the other way. What's really sad is that if she can do it, who else can do it? She may be a bad mom, but she wasn't a terrorist. But think of how easy it would be for one to get a job at such a vulnerable spot for Americans. Securitywise, it could have been very bad. O'Hare should be severely reprimanded.
55159
"want the country to succeed" ??? \n\nSooo, men and women dying off for a pointless cause is considered success?? \n\nI must have missed that day in History class....\n\nNo I'm NOT happy she was arrested, IMHO it was absolutely uncalled for. So he can stand up there and speak his voice and she can't sit in the room with a simple t-shirt on? \n\nMy husband serves our country & has been to Baghdad and back... for Sheehan to have been arrested defeats the purpose of what men and women of our country have fought for. \n\nIt's like me saying, well I'm going to invite you to my baby shower but if you start talking about abortion I'll have to ask you to leave.... \n\nBush and his robots would have gained MUCH more respect if they'd let her sit there, harmless, with her dang t-shirt on....
619335
yes.\n\nbut alas free speech...hate speach but free speach none the less.....heres a great watch dog group that puts her in check.\n\nhttp://mediamatters.org\n\nThe church she says she goes to has dissmissed her,\nShe is either a virgin because of her devotness cause shes not married or a hypocritical whore......\n\n\nAttacking the widows of 9/11 or fallen soliders, is what they want and she gives it to them....and they defend it.\n\nHell i just waiting for her to drop the N bomb (Ni@@a), and her supports to say we were all thinkin it.....
239338
IF this is for real, what has stopped her from seeing the District Attorney? She should have been there the following morning. She should press charges, period...crooked police anywhere are a big problem. IF she has witnesses, will they testify??? Better have all the ducks in a row before going anywhere with this.
668492
Well- if you look in the Yellow Pages under "Attorneys" you should find a whole crapload of them willing to represent her, for a fee.  Why does she need representation for what happened to your brother, anyway?  Sounds like he should not have fled the police.
598100
God dizzle, what are you on about?\n She has every right to say that, and shes true, if you've made up your mind to support bush then so be it. Im sick of us all being labeled 'Liberals', like its a dirty word. Im sorry, i seem to have missed the day when the idea of liberty became such a dirty word to the neo-con americans. \n To the poster, im sorry to hear about that, but some of us are just twats, basically. The left wing is full of 'FUCK BUSH'ers and frankly, its doing my sodding head in, Their are so many other issues we've got to grapple with, and i hated a liberal who doesnt know their facts. Im proud to be a Liberal, but im also proud to have actually studied my topics and know what im on about.\n I'd be glad to have a logical discussion with you :) Frankly, i dotn care if someones right-wing, if their courteous and rational im open to chat