It seems to me to be an epistomilogical issue, not one of physics?
206021
It is a principle that can be either experimentaly shown or derived from quantum mechanical equations (shrodinger, dirac...) \nIt states that if you try to measure the value of a particles position and momentum you will always have an uncertanity of (&#92;hbar)/2 where &#92;hbar is basicly a h that is crossed like a "t".  It is planks constat divide by 2 (&#92;pi)\nso its around 10^(-34) Js\n\nthe principle it self says &#92;sigma_x &#92;sigma_p >= &#92;hbar /2\nwhere &#92;sigma_x is the standard deviation of x\n\nso if you take a bunch of identical systems and measure a particals possition and momentum you will not get exactly repeating results.  \n\n\nAlso notice that if you prepare the system such that the possition is exactly known the momentum can be any thing and vice versa.  \n\nBut that is the simple explination
555896
no it is not true\n\nis this a question?
123559
Metaphysics is not really physics at all in my opinion.  I think it is a branch of philosophy that is touted by those who lack an understanding of science and want to ascribe a greater meaning to the world, to feel like they are more important in "reality" than we are.
106535
Your analogy doesn't represent the problem at all.  \n\nWhen we say a particle is treated as a wave it refers to the particle actually not existing at any particular point.  It actually exists at all of points in some region with a certain probability (it is everywhere at once).
362028
i do not think so.\nand the problem is not solvable....\n'
321464
It may be surface tension.
460594
communication problems or clashing of ideas
652859
Perhaps both.\nThe two are not necessarily mutually exclusive.
284904
Dont worry about it !! \n\nChristianity is fake & illogical anyway !!
422703
I agree that including a section under science called "alternative" lends a legitimacy to the pseudosciences (crystal healing, psychism, pixies, etc.)--by implying that they are, in fact, another science. The fact that such pseudosciences don't follow the Scientific Method doesn't seem to matter to the persons who put this topic here. My guess ... they weren't scientists.
166994
i see, that's quite a problem. \n\ni guess my first suggestion would be for you to post a loopy, rambling, sophomoric series of questions to a panoply of strangers on some generic internet forum--preferably the first one you come across.\n\nhope this helps!
568586
Hmm. never thought of it that way...\nThat's a very interesting insight.
289735
I just want to answer your question, but I just don't know why this just must be so. Is it just another excuse to get just 2 more points? I just suspect that it just must be. But that is just my thoughts on this very just matter.\n\nJust me.....
145476
I have always been fascinated by the way that processing in the brain leads to the experience of the mind. An understanding of this relationship has eluded science throughout the ages and i wanted to be involved in trying to advance our understanding of the brain-mind relationship. I should add that some people believe there is no such thing as the mind and that all we should be trying to study is the physical processing performed by the brain.
83791
Invisible Ink Isn't\n\nSeeing Isn't Believing\n\nReading Between The Lines\n\nYou do realize good science titles are not being cute, but short, accurate and correct.
34376
I am assuming you meant Physics...
494714
It could be anything, or it could be nothing.\n\nI think you're reading WAY more into this then is actually there.