Who has had more? Clinton in 8 years or Bush in 6? How many can you name? Best answer goes to the longest/most complete list.
213533
No bias here just facts.  please read below:\n\nClinton:\n\nDuring Clinton's tenure, the U.S. enjoyed continuous economic expansion, reductions in unemployment, and growing wealth through a massive rise in the stock market. The economic boom ended in Q1, 2000, 10 months before his term ended in January, 2001, possibly indicative of a stock market bubble. Although the reasons for the expansion are continually debated, Clinton proudly pointed to a number of economic accomplishments, including:\n\nMore than 22 million new jobs \nHomeownership rate increase from 64.0% to 67.5% \nLowest unemployment rate in 30 years \nHigher incomes at all levels \nLargest budget deficit in American history converted to the largest surplus of over $200 billion \nLowest government spending as a percentage of GDP since 1974 [7] \nHigher stock ownership by families than ever before \n220% increase in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, 300% increase in the Nasdaq from 1993 to 2001 \nThe reasons for this growth are hotly debated, but Clinton supporters cite his 1993 tax increase as the reason that eventually led to the reduction in the annual budget deficits every year of his tenure. These deficit reductions stimulated consumption and consumer spending and strengthened the dollar, which encouraged foreign investment in the United States economy. Alan Greenspan supported the 1993 tax increase, which was approved by Congress without a single Republican vote. [8] Critics of Clinton point to Alan Greenspan's strong chairmanship of the Federal Reserve, 1995 spending cuts and the Republican Party's Contract with America initiatives as alternative reasons for America's strong economic growth of the late 90's. Critics also argue that the economic recovery had already begun before Bill Clinton took office and did not pick up momentum until 1995 and 1996, after the GOP took over Congress (despite the fact that GDP growth was higher in 1994 than in either 1995 or 1996). Many economists attribute massive growth to the dot-com boom which just happened to come during Clinton's term, thus adding many new jobs which may not be directly attributed to policies of the Clinton administration.\n\nIn 1999, Clinton was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice by the U.S. House of Representatives. He was acquitted by the Senate. The perjury charge arose from Clinton's testimony about his relationship to Monica Lewinsky during a sexual harassment lawsuit brought by former Arkansas-state employee Paula Jones. The obstruction charge was based on his actions during the subsequent investigation of that testimony. On February 12, the Senate concluded a 21-day trial with the vote on both counts falling short of the Constitutional requirement of a two-thirds majority to convict and remove an office holder. The final vote was generally along party lines, with all of the votes to convict being cast by Republicans. On the perjury charge 55 senators voted to acquit, including 10 Republicans, and 45 voted to convict; on the obstruction charge the Senate voted 50-50. [22] Clinton, like the only other president to be impeached, Andrew Johnson, served the remainder of his term.\n\nThe day before leaving office, Clinton agreed to a five-year suspension of his Arkansas law license as part of an agreement with the independent counsel to end the investigation. Based on this suspension, Clinton was also automatically suspended from the United States Supreme Court bar, from which he chose to resign. [17][18] Clinton's resignation was mostly symbolic, as he had never practiced before the Supreme Court and was not expected to in the future. Clinton also was assessed a $90,000 fine by federal judge Susan Webber Wright for contempt of court. The Paula Jones lawsuit was settled out of court for $850,000.\n\nIn addition to impeachment and the Whitewater scandal, the Clinton White House was the subject of many other controversies.\n\nThe White House travel office con
301167
Ever is a big word.  Hayes was known as a bad president.  Garfield, too, I think.  My mother recalls Hoover with venom.  Nixon was tried for impeachment and branded a crook, but he had a few triumphs that washed him in the history books.  I cannot say Bush is the worst president ever, but I will say he is absolutely, the worst to surface in my 42 years of life.
71064
Hell if I know, but there's been worse presidents in history than Bush, as I'm sure we'll have more in the future that will make Bush look like an angel. \nI think people just like to focus on the hear and now rather than the bigger picture of things. \nPersonally, I'd perfer Bush over Clinton...but that's just me.
82200
The Clinton Legacy\n\n\nThe Progressive Review\n\n\nThis list was compiled at the end of the Clinton administration.\n\n\nOur Clinton Scandal Index\n\n\nRECORDS SET\n\n- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance \n- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates* \n- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation \n- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify \n- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly \n- First president sued for sexual harassment. \n- First president accused of rape. \n- First first lady to come under criminal investigation\n- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case\n- First president to establish a legal defense fund.\n- First president to be held in contempt of court\n- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions \n- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad\n- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court\n\n* According to our best information, 40 government officials were indicted or convicted in the wake of Watergate. A reader computes that there was a total of 31 Reagan era convictions, including 14 because of Iran-Contra and 16 in the Department of Housing & Urban Development scandal. 47 individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine were convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes with 33 of these occurring during the Clinton administration itself. There were in addition 61 indictments or misdemeanor charges. 14 persons were imprisoned. A key difference between the Clinton story and earlier ones was the number of criminals with whom he was associated before entering the White House.\n\nUsing a far looser standard that included resignations, David R. Simon and D. Stanley Eitzen in Elite Deviance, say that 138 appointees of the Reagan administration either resigned under an ethical cloud or were criminally indicted. Curiously Haynes Johnson uses the same figure but with a different standard in "Sleep-Walking Through History: America in the Reagan Years: "By the end of his term, 138 administration officials had been convicted, had been indicted, or had been the subject of official investigations for official misconduct and/or criminal violations. In terms of number of officials involved, the record of his administration was the worst ever."\n\n\nSTARR-RAY INVESTIGATION\n\n- Number of Starr-Ray investigation convictions or guilty pleas (including one governor, one associate attorney general and two Clinton business partners): 14\n- Number of Clinton Cabinet members who came under criminal investigation: 5 \n- Number of Reagan cabinet members who came under criminal investigation: 4\n- Number of top officials jailed in the Teapot Dome Scandal: 3\n\nCRIME STATS\n\n- Number of individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes: 47 \n- Number of these convictions during Clinton's presidency: 33 \n- Number of indictments/misdemeanor charges: 61 \n- Number of congressional witnesses who have pleaded the Fifth Amendment, fled the country to avoid testifying, or (in the case of foreign witnesses) refused to be interviewed: 122\n\nSMALTZ INVESTIGATION\n\n- Guilty pleas and convictions obtained by Donald Smaltz in cases involving charges of bribery and fraud against former Agriculture Secretary Mike Espy and associated individuals and businesses: 15 \n- Acquitted or overturned cases (including Espy): 6 \n- Fines and penalties assessed: $11.5 million \n- Amount Tyson Food paid in fines and court costs: $6 million\n\nCLINTON MACHINE CRIMES \nFOR WHICH CONVICTIONS \nHAVE BEEN OBTAINED\n\nDrug trafficking (3), racketeering, extortion, bribery (4), tax evasion, kickbacks, embezzlement (2), fraud (12), conspiracy (5), fraudulent loans, illegal gifts (1), illegal campaign contributions (5), money laundering (6), perjury, obstruction of justice.\n\nOTH
553336
Clinton did kill people too . He also was otherwise preoccupied when the terrorists were planning 911. He let Bin Laden go free. More than 40 people who had dealings with Clinton died mysteriously. Bush is A man of integrity. He stopped Saddam before he had his nuclear weapon. Clinton gave away the instructions on how to builds one. Liberals are impossible to deal with. Illogical people are that way. They don't let facts get in the way of a good Bush bashing. I wish they could study your pea brains and figure what went wrong. Aussie chick this is none of your business.
125187
At inauguration or at the end of their husband's term?\n\nIf at the start of the term - Anna Harrison at age 65, died while her husband was serving.\n\nIf at the end of the term - Nancy Reagan was 67, Barbara Bush was 67 too and wins age by about a month.
73166
I don't mind Bush being in Office but I hope that Hillary does not get in.  Something wrong with Bill getting back into the White House did't he do enoth to the U.S.'s good name the first time he was in?
546743
Well your advantages are (none)!!!\nYour disadvantages are: If you had a good president (Clinton) he could only have 6 years to fix the budget that the right wingers left for us. If you had a bad president (Bush #1 and Bush #2) they would  be around for 2 extra years. I know Bush #2 got reelected, but that was solely on scare tactics. To be honest he cheated his way in the first time with the whole recount in Florida.  Where his brother is governor.
19541
Look up something more specific. I mean, you must be able to think of something? How about Nixon, Clinton, almost any other political leader, and tons of other stuff that I can't think of cus it's late.
271794
Man, you should have seen the state of the Oval Office when my boy Bill left: pizza boxes, empty forties, condom rappers all over the place!  Don't even get me started on the Lincoln Bedroom!  Anyway, Bush had all that stuff cleaned up by the summer of 2002, so no he's not currently cleaning up Clinton's mess.
171919
Too many to count, it varies too...\nHere are what other people had said...\nhttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AoFzucNs1hO7T4QEuHujyH3sy6IX?qid=1006040205139
216491
I've never liked Bush, but thanks for summing up all of the reasons, and yes he should be impeached if you're interested. Clinton was a much better president.
74607
The question must be viewed in the same light as other first ladies.  This country has had Hilary Clinton, who you might hate but she did get elected Senator and all you haters (I personally won't vote for her) we have to admit she is popular.  And there is Elenor Roosevelt, and Jackie O Kennedy.  So amoungst these who have had serious popularity and adoration, even Elenor's contributions,  we must acknowledge that Mrs. Bush does not compare with these greats.\n\nTherefore we place her in my view in the second category, that is, the rest of em save one or two others who were pretty good, as just eye candy really.\n\nThere was one mrs wilson who apparently ran the nation for a while, if not here someone around that time
524071
How many times do I have to explain this? Clinton is a Dem, & therefore not capable of ever being wrong. Bush is a Rep & therefore not capable of being right. \nSee how easy it is when you don't have to do your own thinking?
653115
the second george bush. even though the first one wasnt the best either.
435273
I've seen some stupid questions on here, but this one has to be near the top of the list.  The American people have had enough of the Bush's to last 10 lifetimes.  What a totally absurd idea!!!
211215
It was great to hear a reasonable explanation for affairs to date. Isn't funny that president Clinton is informed and willing to talk about the affairs of the World. I watched Senator McCain this morning on Meet The Press, and he said George Bush was Stupid about the Relationship with President Putin from Russia. I about fell on the floor, he said he didn't agree or vote for Bush's policies all through Bush's terms. I know that that isn't true, but that's what was said.