Some employers have the employee take a pre-employment physical examination. How in detail can these be in accordance with law?
203142
I would think if it's for insurance purposes, it would be allowed.
384793
It's quite common for Occupational Health to want to see you - they asked to see me when I switched from a temporary contract to a permanent one doing the exact same job!!\n\nThey're not there to catch you out at all they just want to check that you are fit for the job, are aware of any required training (e.g. manual handling if you're going to be lifting things) and that you are aware of any support available if you do have any worries or problems in your new role. So don't worry!
661043
You should look into the ethics standards section(s) of the Joint Commission agency, this agency regulates almost every aspect of a health care facility and there practices. Also you can get OSHA involved, this agency also deals with the health care but only in the "safety"  aspect. I have learned that the word safety also implies not only to hazardous materials and situations but to safety in the "work environment" in that a coworker can conduct themselves in a threatening way (as to) and there by creating an unsafe working environment. This is not a word play, it is a fact. you should look into this.
355209
When you injure yourself in any way.It is advisable to discus the situation with your doctor and employer.If you had a work related injury the company would'nt want you to aggravate that injury and would generally put you to work(light duties)out of harms way.Now a non related injury(work)is a difficult situation for the employer As if you aggravate the injury,no matter what your duties are they(employer)are fully liable.So they do have the right to deny you work.In fact they can direct you to get medical clearance from thier doctor or a medical pratitioner acting on thier behalf
310556
There would be no reason to.If the test was negative when you were at work that's all they need to know.Those workmen comp people are assholes.Don't trust them
64729
Several comments - \n\n(1) Most employers have a paper that you signed allowing for random drug testing...it does not say anything about when they can test.\n\n(2) If someone is taking any medication, even OTC, you need to report that before taking the test - there is normally a spot for that info on the paperwork you signed.\n\n(3) It is legal for an employer to request medical proof (note from doctor) to verify ANY sick time. Most employers don't bother, but they could.  \n\nBottom line - You have been taking more time off work than your boss thinks is reasonable. They decided to find out if it was legitimate or if you were bs-ing. Since you failed the drug test, they don't have to do anything futher. \n\nTo others who may be in similar situation - pay more attention to what you sign and company policies. Also make sure to document EVERYTHING.
304604
You need to understand that these laws vary from state to state. There are also federal laws that come into play.  Most statesobserve the doctrine of employment at will.  This means you can fire an employee for any reason at all whether it be a good reason, a bad one, or no reason at all in the absence of an employment contract.  Sometimes an employee handbook has been held to be a contract in the absence of a conspicuous disclaimer. Usually the only recourse an employee has is to file for unemployment benefits which you should expect.  While it does not sound like you meet the threshhold in terms of the number of employees, you should also review the Family Medical Leave act which is a federal law that applies to larger employers.  Caution: every state has its own employment laws.
399693
Yes, yes, yes and YES again.  They must be subjected to it before they are hired as part of the hiring process, and also get random testing.  If private companies are doing it, why not them?
506128
All of them do, and it is done to protect not only the company, but yourself and your customers as well.  You don't have to agree to a drug test, but if you do not you will be admitting you most likely have something to hide, and your career will be short....clean out if you need to, take the test, and be SURE you don't give management any reason to question whether you need to be retested at random intervals.
586135
you have the right to ask for it.  go to HR dept, and ask for it.  it is a standard employee /recruitment procedure.  the guy who takes care of your documentation probably very busy or too lazy.  yo have to get it, cause it may not be on your best interest if you have problems with your employement, without proper documents.. it is your fault, as much as the company;s fault for failure to obtain those documents/contract.
60890
In California, it would be illegal to fire someone for filng a claim for workers compensation.  I suspect there will be similar laws in other states, but you should an attorney in your state to find out for sure.  In California, the applicable statute is Labor Code Section 132a.\n\nThe tricky part for you is that the doctor doesn't seem to think you are ready to return to work.  There is nothing with hiring a temporary replacement worker, so you might still ba able to go back to work when the doctor releases you from work restrictions.
435862
You will need to consult with the labor & employee laws for your state and/or city.
51006
Unfortunately, an employer can pretty much demand an employee to do anything that's not illegal.  The only exception would be if there was an employment agreement signed that specifically outlines duties.\n\nIs it right?  I don't think so.  But other than finding another job or risk getting fired, I don't think there's a thing you can do about it.
314043
You should ask for a copy and take it to a Lawyer to have him/her check over the legal ramifications of the document and if your company has any right in doing so.
108380
They make sure you are healthy so you don't die of a heart attack or something worse.  It is best to have a physical before playing any type of sports.  They strip you naked and check you from head to toe plus every orifice.
616862
Some court decisions have leaned toward the employer's needs in these cases.  Where the appearance of an employee can reasonably be expected to be acceptable to the general public, the clientele, an employer has the right to decide on an applicant's appearance and whether it might or might not be acceptable to the businesses customers.  \n\nIn reality, everyone is to a large degree hired or not on the basis of appearance and the manner in which they answer questions during the interview, where there is one.  So, this also supports what some of the courts have said.
193126
What you just said would be good enough reason. If there are unsafe work condition, then that gives the potential for people to get hurt. That is a lawsuit waiting to happen. How bad are the work conditions? If I were I would take it up with the Better Business Bureau if it is serious enough..but if you have already quit, I don't understand why you need another reason?