Like...how living beings came...n how we humans came?
208086
it started with chemicals ,followed by ,very simple unicellular things,they worked there way up to amoebas,and it was only a couple of million years to get to bacteria and stuf like coral after that ,then it becomes complicated,\n\nhumans came from out of space i think,they were put here and primitive beings that were already here were maybe genetically improved by those who came from the stars.\n\nas to how humans come ,that is another question
226923
Bird was created during the Dinosaur period.  After the end of that period, humans followed.  Humans evolved from the great ape stock of species.  Genetic engineering over the centuries has helped us along to where we are today.  The genetic engineering of our DNA was performed by life forms superior to us.
598197
No one found life on Earth as life was made on Earth, we evolvolutionised from bacteria that was by nothing but infectious static.\nAliens found life on Earth and put you on it as everything that I know that is from this planet didn't come from another world we were made from the soil.
354483
Origin of the first life.
171915
Evolution isn't something that happens instantly, it is a slow process that takes a long time. Humans actually have only been around for a few thousand years and "civilized" humans have only been around for 10,000 years. In fact, hominids (upright walking apes that are all extinct except for humans) have only been around for less than 2 million years. We are evolving slowly but by the time we radically change, we will not notice because the change would have been very very slow.
42405
Monkeys?  Humans evolved from this source, however, it wasn't over night, this took place over thousands of years.  There are snow monkeys anyway, living in the Himalayas so that blows your theory.
574416
How life came into existance and how the different species have evolved or undergone changes has been the subject of constant analysis as well as  conjecture by mankind. Most religions have tried to theorize that all creation is the work of God. Modern science however does not 'see' the hand of God for creation to occur and believes that the different forms of life evolved from the primordial soup, made up of oxygen, nitrogen, oxides of nitrogen, hydrogen etc (simple molecules) dissolved in water and catalysed by lightening. Further evolution to higher forms of life was a natural process of selection which is exemplified best by the 'Dashawatar' analogy of the Hindus, amongst  all the prevailing religious theories. At which precise moment the advent of different species began, including that of humans, and where it will stop are all matters of conjectures (in the absence of scientific answers), feeding the various religious and non-religious dogmas.
550420
monkeys did NOT evolve into humans.  neither did apes or any other primate currently living on this planet.\n\nHUMANS AND MONKEYS AND APES SHARED A COMMON ANCESTOR.\n\nIt has been 5 minutes since I last posted this answer.
102012
In my opinion, your question gives more validity of Darwin's theory of Evolution than Creation. That we are what and who we are, because of years of adaptation in this planet. As our prehistoric ancestors (supposedly apes), dispersed their population throughout the earth surface of Pangaea (known to be just one big geological land mass before it broke up into the continents we now know and live on). Since earth features climatic conditions that varies from different regions, all living beings on it has to adapt to these conditions. Nature provided the biological elements within our body through time in changing each and everyone's varying skin tone, made possible by a biochemical called Melanin. The presumption whether Adam and Eve were white, or if our skin color has any form of bearing towards intelligence is quite superficial, because color is just naturally skin deep. Getting back to whether the first humans were here instantaneous in origin as theology would suggest, it is Evolution that explains changes in: Nature, migration, time, and adaptation, brought about the multitude of human races, plants, and other living and non living oddities here on earth.
555589
its called mutation, when a species must adapt in a certain way in order to survive in the new environment, mutations occur and their offspring gets it, and the offspring therefore can adapt to the new environment, in our way, we evolved into humans so we can adapt to our daily lives
508987
These are two good reasons for believing in evolution instead of these silly notions. We come from earlier life, through the familiar process of selection, reproduction, and variation. That earlier life comes from even earlier life. At some point in the distant past there was some primitive first life. It came from inorganic matter. \n\nWhere that matter came from is not clear, but we're making progress on understanding that. The leading contender, I believe, is that it DID simply pop into existence. I think that someday we may even understand how that is possible, but I'm confident that no-one today understands it.
129944
God created the earth and the heavens. The first people on earth was Adam and Eve. There's your answer have a nice day.
388788
There have been a lot of questions about this recently, and as you stated, there are billions of galaxies out there.\nHow many we don't know.  But certainly enough that it isn't out of the question that a lifeform could evolve out there.  Not necessarily humanoid but a lifeform.  They may not look anything like humans or for that matter anything we got on earth.\nThe fact is, everything we know about living things is based on what we have available here on earth.\nThere is the possibility of a lifeform that doesn't require an oxygen based atmosphere.  \nWe are still in the infancy stage of development in space.  If the beings out there are advanced by say 10000 years and have the technology, they could already have been here and are monitoring us as we plod along.  Nobody knows for sure.\nAll we have are guesses and speculation.  No hard facts are available.
271292
>>>If life was not created by an intelligent, self-aware,\n>>> designer, where did evolution get intelligence and self \n>>>awareness to "give" us?\n\n\nIt got it from a series of mutations and processes selecting for increased intelligence. Intelligence is simply the result of ever increasing ability to process and respond to sensory information. It is no harder to ‘get’ than size. \n\nYou might just as well ask if all organisms evolved from microscopic bacteria, where did evolution get size to give to whales. The difference between whales and bacteria in terms of size is one of degree, not kind. And in exactly the same the difference between a human and a bacterium WRT intelligence is one of degree, not kind.\n\n\n\n>>>>There appear to be three levels of life, plants (having\n>>>> no awareness), animals (having sensory perception), and \n>>>> humans(perceiving self and contemplating all things). \n\nThat quite obviously isn’t true. Anyone who has lived outside a city knows that plants perceive and respond to the passing of the seasons and the timing of the rains.\n\nOnce again I have to stress that the difference between plant intelligence and human intelligence is one of degree, not of kind. It is not the case that plants have one type of intelligence and humans have another. Plants simply have much less intelligence than humans\n\n>>>>Neoteny… How can anything retain something which it has\n>>>> not received? How can anything be received from a\n>>>> source that does not have *that* thing?\n\nI think you need to spend at leats one hour studying this subject before criticising. All animals receive the genetic instructions for their juvenile from their parents.\n\nIt is amazing that someone in the 21st century could actually believe that God personally builds young animals and that the form of a kitten has no genetic basis whatsoever.
220103
I wouldn't say that I'm anymore intelligent than someone else, but I did want to answer your question, so....\n\nYou are confusing the theory of evolution (diversification of species) with the theory of abiogenesis (life from natural compounds).  That's okay, many people confuse the two.\n\n1.  How did life get from soup to single-celled organisms?  From wikipedia, "J.B.S Haldane suggested that the earth's pre-biotic oceans - very different from their modern counterparts - would have formed a "hot dilute soup" in which organic compounds, the building blocks of life, could have formed.\nIn 1953, taking their cue from Oparin and Haldane, the chemists Stanley L. Miller and Harold C. Urey carried out an experiment on the "primeval soup". Within two weeks organic amino acids, the basic building blocks of life, had formed. While Miller and Urey did not actually create life; they demonstrated that a more complex molecule — the amino-acids — could emerge spontaneously from simpler chemicals, in the presence of an external energy source in an atmosphere largely devoid of oxygen (the experiment involved shooting a spark, representing lightning, into their flask of supposedly primitive earth-gases)."\n\n2.  How did the original cell eat and develop asexual reproduction?   You are putting the cart before the horse.  In order to get to the cell stage, self-replicating molecules had to exist first... i.e. reproduction & "nourishment"  was occurring well before the cell stage.  Also, what are you referring to with "nourishment"?  For a self-replicating molecule, nourishment would consist of other molecules that it could combine with to form more of itself.\n\n3.  In the "soup", how did primordial cells develop resistences?  Resistence to what?  I don't understand this question.  To the environment?  To viruses or bacteria?  You need to elaborate here, I'm sorry.  I think it ties into your next answer, but not sure.  Please read my answer to #4.\n\n4.  How did it evolve everything it needed if it wasn't in it's DNA?  Can you give an example?  Hmm.  I'm trying to understand how you are approaching this question.  Let's say you have 100 little cells, each a little different.  5 cells can withstand a higher water temperature than the others because of a mutation they have.  One day the temperature goes up and kills off the other 95 cells.  That only leaves the 5 with the mutation.  They scamper off and reproduce like crazy... the cell strain has just evolved a little.  Now repeat this a gazillion times with a dynamic interacting environment and there you go.
454650
from dust to dust... God create as from dust to remind us without HIM, we are nothing... All perfect things come from GOD... from meaningless to a glorify creature, because people are created in HIS Image... without HIS image then we're nothing.. He's planning not by coincidence... I put some verse, hopefully help us...\n\nThe LORD God took a handful of SOIL and made a MAN. God breathed LIFE into the man, and the man started BREATHING \n(Gen 2:7)\n\nGod said, "Now we will make humans, and they will be like us. We will let them rule the fish, the birds, and all other living creatures." So God created humans to be like himself; he made men and women. \n(Gen 1:26-27)\n\n\nGbu
140999
It is thought that man came from ape like ancestors, not quite monkey's.  \n\nIt could take hundreds of thousands of years for macro evolution to occur.  Wait around that long, and i guarantee there will be NEW species.  So it is still happening.\n\nThe fossil record is not complete because fossils are hard to come by, not everything fossilises despite contrary belief.  In fact it's amazing we have as much info as we do.\n\nHow on earth does it take less belief to believe in a god, there is no evidence whatsoever for this!  At least evolution has enough evidence to fill several hundred warehouses, what do you have, testimony.. Yeah right, thanks, i'll keep to evidence, not faith to inform my decisions about the world around me.