It is time to elect a new world leader, and only \nyour vote counts. Here are the facts about the three \ncandidates. \n\nCandidate A. \nAssociates with crooked politicians, and consults \nwith astrologist. He's had two mistresses. He also \nchain smokes and drinks 8 to 10 martinis a day. \n\nCandidate B. \nHe was kicked out of office twice, sleeps until \nnoon, used opium in \ncollege and drinks a quart of \nwhiskey every evening.\n\nCandidate C \nHe is a decorated war hero. He's a vegetarian, \ndoesn't smoke, drinks an occasional beer and never \ncheated on his wife.\n\nwho do you choose?
206607
Candidate B. For him to be kicked out of office twice means that he must have been voted in twice, so for him to be voted in twice he must be doing something right. Though he doesnt make the best personal decisions I'd go with him.\n :)
586082
It sux we only get two choices.....Why cant we have more?  People just vote the lesser of two evils....No one is really ever happy with the choices.  We vote holding our noses.....
599525
I don't think it is advisable nor feasible that one leader over the entire world would be a good idea. While perhaps someone to regulate the sovereign countries may seem smart in all essence you have to remember the human factor. Once you give someone that much power it becomes harder and harder to regulate them and keep corruption out of the top ranking offices. Capitalism started out helping America, but has quickly turned fascist, because the human factor was left out of the equation. A single person in charge of the world I fear would be inviting trouble. While I wouldn't even recommend a committee to be in charge of the entire world it makes more sense than one person.
23698
As a neighbor he might not be a bad guy, I could see drinking a beer and watching a baseball game with him. However as a world leader he leaves quite a bit to be desired...the environmental problems have been mounting for years so the blame can't solely be his, my main beef with his 'regime' has been the fact that he condemns religious fanatasism (sp?) abroad and embraces it at home...
232215
Hey! How about a son of a Prime Minister, who prevents his father from causing global mayhem? ;-)\n\nHe could be like a secret superhero (or a govt. spy or something) unknown to both his father and the world. And you could make his father seem a total buffoon. That would be hilarious and not very far from current world scenarios! What say?\n\nBut of the above mentioned choices, no.5 is undoubtedly the best.
453272
your question has no answer.  They are all corrupt.   Now if you were to ask   ' who is the most influential leader for  the corrupt?'\nthat would be different.
289171
1) He was voted, and depends on the support of, by the "Religious Right". As an atheist, well, I'm wary of supporting someone whose dad said atheists shouldn't be citizens.\n\n2) He opposes gay rights, affirmative action, and abortion. As a liberal, again, these go against my philosophy.\n\n3) He invaded Iraq needlessly, and without waiting for the rest of the world. And for what? WMD's were non-existent, and Iraq wasn't much of a threat anyways.\n\n4) Under the Bush admin, privacy has decreased dramatically. AT&T has already confessed to giving the NSA authority to monitor Internet communicatons, and by saying "protect the children" from porn, the Justice Department got search records of most of the Internet prooviders.\n\nAs far as what he did do right, he invaded Afghanistan after their gov. attacked us. He strengthened the economy, or at least didn't make it weaker. And I guess he handled 9/11 ok.\n\nSassyk : Wow, way to be detailed ;) Bush may be a crook, but then again, just about every politician, left, right, or middle is dishonest. That's just how politics was and probably will be 'til the Earth blows up.\n\nEDIT2 : thanks for the compliment, cadbury :)\n\nbuttercup : Whoa. I never got the "Liberals allow terrorism" memo. And DUH, of course liberals and Democrats hate Bush, it's called politics. Remember how much Republicans hated Clinton when he was in office?
291417
he doesnt have to do shit. he is not up for reelction. the vp is not up for election... he has nothing to loose but gain lots of money for bigbiz... that is just the fact for the next 3 years..
524804
Unfortunately, even now they are not. Anyone can make mistakes. So, electing him first time is understandable. But re-electing him is shocking. Supporting him even now is completely beyond my grasp.
76352
For this, look into ancient Greek history. That's the last time this planet saw true democracy. Now it's a hopeful face draped over a rotting corpse beneath. It's about time for something to change in the world. Something big. This planet needs an enema.
91538
1. Politics\n2. Politics\n3. Politics
103788
It's all the Alcohol and drugs these NEO_CON'S are using. Clinton's written three novels and Hillary is in her second term, as Senator of New York, just adding to their portfolio. These drunks and drug addicts are stuck in the 60's. "WHERE DID IT ALL GO MAN" Up your nose, and in your stomach's that where it all went NEO_CON'S. Vote these them out in November.
259340
There are many changes I would like to see by the end of the 21st century. Changes with peace, hunger, AIDs, the list goes on and on. If I had to pick three these would be it : ____,____, and ____.\n\nthat can be a help for the 1st paragraph. the next 3 paragraps can tell what you'd change & why. The last can be the 1st paragraph re-worded.
412920
Wow, that was a tough read between the caps and the strange punctuation. Anyway, if I accept that power corrupts absolutely, then the solution is to always keep the person in power fresh. That is the idea behind term limits and such. It keeps a person from holding on to power. If you change out the group who is in power with another group every so often you can limit the spread of corruption.
67888
He has a better organized military and is using it for evil. He needs to be impeached even though it won't happen because of the majority in the senate. Then he needs to be arrested and tried in a world court for the crimes that he has commited.
136981
Stay the hell away from #1!!!\nWhat makes #2 a badboy? \nWhy would you pick #3 is he's already spoken for? - He should be out of the equation.\n#4 seems like the best bet, but can you go to the family picnic without it being akward?
208112
It would be good if they were liked by a majority of their own people, in order to be liked they need to be in touch with them. In our case we have no leader. He has lost touch with reality and touch with his people. Even those that voted for him are abandoning him.