Would we have holy trouts, and salmons? And holy sharks?
204062
No.  The water would be blessed, but I don't think the things in the water would become holy.  You would have to bless those too.  Just my opinion, I can be changed with the right argument.
643313
UM LET ME THINKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK: POSEIDON OR MAYBE THAT WAS 2 ONTHS AGO. MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MAYBE THE DERBY STALLION.
327416
I don't believe in evolution, just try and picture your ancesters being fish, or any thing else crawling up out of the sea!
228380
You have it all wrong.  The Bible is the cookbook.  You forget the saying about teaching a man to fish.  Jesus worshipping missionaries are taking it one step further.  If you teach a man to feed 1000 with 1 fish and turn saltwater to wine, you will never have food shortages.  They are doing wonderful work out there in the third world.
349874
An interesting point.  And, at first glance, I would say yes.  However, from the Christian point of view, nature was corrupted along with the fall of man.   Also, different kinds of animals function in different ways.  Many elements of nature function in a strictly selfish, self-preserving way - in the individualistic sense.  Others are more centred on the collectivity.\nSome animals owned by man (dogs, horses) have been known to behave in seemingly unselfish ways,  putting their owners life before their own.  Hard to know what motivates them - is it the self-preserving instinct for the collectivity that has been deterred toward the human owner?  I don't know.\nSo, not being an expert in zoology, I would still suggest that we need a more absolute measure of morality than nature, even though we can learn some things from nature.
412691
Our home is headed for ruination. All the reports including one i saw on the news today regarding the fish stocks in the sea needing to be protected from commercial fishing , fossil fuels like gas, oil,  climate change, deforestation.  We will not make it past 2050 without radical change.\n         Revelation 11  v 17.
645765
Central, no. Inclusive, yes. The Bible gives us many guidelines (food and health laws) to start with. God's word teaches us to love and respect all His creation. That in itself should give anyone pause to think before acting and to take responsibility for his/her own actions. Self respect should lead us, as well, to keep our environment clean for health. Considering specific species saving or not - a complex issue by itself, beyond my time alloted for this venue.
446681
Yes, fish contains Omega-3 which is very good for you. I have always heard Salmon is the best though. I think it is higher in Omega-3.
651924
Gen. 7:14\nFrom the foregoing, it becomes apparent that Noah could get all the necessary animals into the ark for preservation through the Flood. The Bible does not say that he had to preserve alive every variety of the animals. Rather, it states: “Of the flying creatures according to their kinds and of the domestic animals according to their kinds, of all moving animals of the ground according to their kinds, two of each will go in there to you to preserve them alive.” (Ge 6:20; 7:14, 15) Jehovah God knew it was necessary to save only representative members of the different “kinds,” since they would reproduce in variety after the Flood.\n\nFollowing the recession of the floodwaters, these comparatively few basic “kinds” emerged from the ark and spread out over the surface of the earth, eventually producing many variations of their “kinds.” Although many new varieties have come into existence since the Flood, the surviving “kinds” have remained fixed and unchanged.\n\nCould the Ark Have Held All the Animals?\n\nThe “kinds” of animals selected had reference to the clear-cut and unalterable boundaries or limits set by the Creator, within which boundaries creatures are capable of breeding “according to their kinds.” It has been estimated by some that the hundreds of thousands of species of animals today could be reduced to a comparatively few family “kinds”—the horse kind and the cow kind, to mention but two. The breeding boundaries according to “kind” established by Jehovah were not and could not be crossed. With this in mind some investigators have said that, had there been as few as 43 “kinds” of mammals, 74 “kinds” of birds, and 10 “kinds” of reptiles in the ark, they could have produced the variety of species known today. Others have been more liberal in estimating that 72 “kinds” of quadrupeds and less than 200 bird “kinds” were all that were required. That the great variety of animal life known today could have come from inbreeding within so few “kinds” following the Flood is proved by the endless variety of humankind—short, tall, fat, thin, with countless variations in the color of hair, eyes, and skin—all of whom sprang from the one family of Noah.\n\nThe ark had a carrying capacity equal to that of 10 freight trains of about 25 American boxcars each!\n\nAt Genesis 6:14, the Hebrew word qin·nim′ (“nests”) is translated “rooms” (KJ, RS), “cabins” (AT), and “compartments” (NW). Evidently these were relatively small compartments in the ark built by Noah and, similar to birds’ nests, served as a protection and shelter through a critical time when men and animals were otherwise helpless.
82149
dump em more fish in the sea that might show you some respect
659632
the holy bible is full of prophecies, i suggest you look into the fullfilled and soon to be fulfilled prophecies. It's better than codes, believe me.
644301
Oh, no.  We are all God's creatures and equal in worth and ability.  Cooooom by ya, my lord, cooooooom by ya.\n\nThanks for the points.  :D
673315
Do you recall the Marijuana plants in the garden of Eden? I didnt think so...and if you think we should eat every plant that exist in the world today how about a hemlock brownie?...a little Hemlock and your going to be dead or in the hospital. the verse you speak of was in Genisis at the start of creation when Adam and Eve were In Eden and were told the could eat of any tree in the garden except the tree in the midst of the garden....they were kicked out of Eden...and all plants are not healthy here.
492524
Good thing, yes.  But on the endangered species list.  There are lots of fundamentalists who would seek to tie the two pretty closely together.
558021
It'll be a much more interesting place...we wouldnt need Christianity then :D
318859
I'm not sure, but are you asking about the seals?  There are some that are not opened and won't be until the End Times.  Course, they're not sacred texts, they're seals, locked away in heaven.
382222
The first clue should be where they are from.  The were located along the shores of the Pacific Northwest, this would point towards seafood.  For protein it would be mostly whale meat and salmon.  For some additional help you might try http://www.makah.com