they are both  legal justice writers. Alison Cooper published a book called Apunishment to fit the crime? in 1996. and Helen Marotta published a book called examiining rules and laws 2nd edition in 1996
217006
probably in a library.??  if not then in a law book store. \nmy guess
328855
keller.clarke.edu/~english/honors/liz.\n\n PLEASE CHECK OUT THIS SITE THE LINKS THAT ARE IN THE  BODY OF THE PAPER ARE INCREDIBLE. GOOD LUCK!!!
390798
I stopped watching her when she had an author on with a book on the bestseller list, an Oprah Book Club book. Oprah says to the guy, "Of all the authors I've had on my show, you're the first one that hasn't thanked me." implying his book only became a best seller because she endorsed it. Did it ever occur to her that if she liked the book, millions of other people did too? She sat there acting like she wrote it and got it published. All she did was read and like it and expected the author to thank her. At that point, I knew fame had finally gone to her head.
28160
Not really..despite it seeming to be justified.  If she comes back after, at a different day and time or even 20 minutes after, having PLANNED to kill him, ie...it is premeditated-  Then NO.  No matter how much of a bastardo he was and may have deserved it, then more than likely NO, she will be tried for murder.  The jury and court may take into consideration her mental state, abused women's syndrome etc...and grant immunity (look into) or a reduced sentence but still she runs the risk of being tried for premeditated murder.  \nIf she kills him during a battle so to speak, during an attack, out of self-defense, then she can use that as her defense in court. \n\nBut to help you stir your creative juices, being a writer myself(currently on hiatus).  That is where the meat of the story can come into place.  That is where you really have to dig deep into your ability and create a reason for her to have been freed or wrongly tried...ie.  (ok I'm giving this away, just give me credit if you use this..hahhah..)...false or fraudulant evidence, witness trouble(anything you can imagine), blackmail on anyone's part, legal loopholes(you'll need legal advise for that), death of witnesses or jurors, a relationship with someone with power...and so on!!  There are so many ways that you can creatively figure something out.  It just requires some serious writing.  Beyond the fast produced plotlines and conflicts.  Think(I know scripts more) Usual Suspects,  Memento,  Donnie Darko, Dead Again..etc.  \nGood luck!\n\noh, and I say this nicely, in case you wrote the question like you write books, hopefully not, work on sentence structure.
29000
While you were in nursing school you and a friend were members in an organization and you and your friend have had charges filed against you. You are being called to appear before a grand jury to answer to charges that you have committed a crime against the state, based on hearsay. You had to drop out of nursing school because of the appearance of an impropiety on your part, that's not unusual, for a school to distance themselves from you a student in this situation. You are aware of something called co-conspirator right? Why isn't your ex-friend on anyone from the organization being called to testify that you had no involvement in the crime? All you can do is hope your attorney is right about hearsay being the only evidence they have and if you didn't do anything wrong then you have nothing to worry about.
623256
You would have a better chance getting an intelligent answer to your question on imbecilicdriviel.com.  \n\nThe communist on this site barely know how to read and if it wasn't for spell check, 90% of them couldn't write.  Why would you think they would they be at all interested in books.\n\nBTW - I love her.  I just can't figure out if it's because she's so in your face to these cowardly scum or if it's that she never writes a word without an objective, verifiable source.  You know, like Dan Rather used to do before he sold out and started making stuff up to suit his own agenda.\n\nFunny how the priorities in the country are different for different people.  Ann Coulter who is so popular because she always uses easily referenced sources is vilified by the left while those same people give a lying scumbag liberal a national anchor spot making millions a year for 20+ years.\n\nAnd the left is actually scratching it's head in disbelief that have not won a significant congressional or senatorial election since 1994.  \n\nAnd they think they're smart for exactly what reason?
469015
not reading a book, and banning it, are two totally different things,,,,,, \n\ni wont read it, just like i didnt watch his trial on tv. but anyone that wants to read it , fine\n\nrich , famous people getting away with murder is not anything new in the country,,, that should be what we are against, the fact he writes a book is secondary
453629
But don't forget that Pinochet was her friend during the Falklands dispute, when she deliberately left British territory undefended, provoking an Argentinian invasion. \n\nSo can't we prosecute her for the negligent manslaughter of 1000 British and Argentinian servicemen as well. They died to save her political career and the British public were too jingoistic to see it.
67860
If it was, then every time someone is found not guilty in court the accuser would then be prosecuted.\n\nWould cut down on prosecutions tho'.
587489
Yes,yes, yes.  \n\nYou are going to get a fine example of exactly how closed minded the open minded left is with this question.  \n\nLet's see if a single one actually answers it without some lame *ss comment.\n\nI did not see her recent interviews or read the book to this point.  If it is like her others, it will be filled with well referenced examples so you may check out if you have doubts as to their validity.  \n\nThat makes it about number 9,000,000,000,000 on the liberal best seller list as they have an apparent allergy to facts and obective references.
582228
I think she is morally wrong to have him charged with manslaughter.  Sounds like the family found a way to make a quick fortune.  My ex did something similar.  Disgusting.
559120
These links should get you started, and will lead you to many othr links.  If you consider they were each from different countries, think about that in terms of their perspectives.  \n\nGood luck with your paper.
115500
A very sick person, a person that should be place behind bars forever.  Now why blame everyone whomever had a sex crime in there past? I agree with stiffer penalties jail time not Scarlett lettering. Megans Law is good for the States for one reason only, they get your hard earned cash for everyone on there list.. So, why not go back 20 years and place these former offenders on this list even though they are no risk to you or your families it adds revenue to our strapped cities. I for one would like to use that money to hire more cops and firefighters and help our schools with supplies for our children. Who killed Megan Kanka? a sick person.
619089
In a country where freedom of speech exists, there Will always be someone shouting about something that you disagree with.  On the other hand, sometimes you agree.  Her book being on the best seller list does not necessarily mean that people agree with her.  They are just listening to what she has to say with an open mind.
322745
Try this.  It's a pretty good overview.\n\nwww.womenshistory.about.com/library/bio/blbio_blackwell_eliz.htm
182555
Helen Shapiro. And here's a couple sites.\nhttp://www.mannamusic.co.uk/\nhttp://www.45-rpm.org.uk/dirh/helens.htm\nhttp://aearwaker.tripod.com/
424665
It should be called..."the rights of the "snitch"...most of the time it is called "States evidence"...wher a criminal would receive no or lesser sentence for their crime if they testify for the prosecution and convince the court/jury of the prosecutions case against the defendant whom in "many cases"; has comited a lesser crime.\nAs for ethical? No it isnt. If I were a judge and even a juror on such a case, I would give them whom cannot do their job properly and or effectively the business.