nothing about super novae, or exploding stars
216215
A star shines because it is undergoing nuclear fusion (from hydrogen to helium), producing energy (light).
2635
Very easy stars are perform nuclear fission, planets do not.
74664
It's B. These are all humanistic with no scientific characteristics.
485686
Our star, the Sun (Sol), is a G-2 class star.  Eventually it will deplete its hydrogen (H), converting into a helium (He) cooler burning star.  When this occurs it will be a cosmocataclysmic and extinction level event as far as the Earth is concerned, for the Sun will hyperdialate 100 times its mass into a Red Giant Star, engulfing the orbit of the Earth.  This event will generate a spontaneous stellar radiation burst, frying half of each planet, and generating a powerful shock wave causing atmospheric violence and may even dislodge planets out of their orbits to realign in new orbits around the Red Giant.  Hence, because the orbits of the planets are not stationary, the Earth most likely will survive when the initial shock wave hits our planet, perturbing its orbit away from the expanding stellar mass, but still it will precipitate an extinction level event that will lay down a new Carboniferous Layer to the Geological Column.\n\nNext, after about one million years our Red Giant will deplete its helium, and due to its enormous mass gravity will cause the star to collapse, thus “crunching” and compressing its internal molecular structure into a White Dwarf Star, while it simultaneously explodes its outer shell, the photosphere, in a sudden catastrophic multi-shock wave event called a “Nebula Discontinuity Event”, or merely a “Nebula”.  This will simultaneously create a Local Compression Bubble around our region of the Galaxy.  Only larger Red Supergiants, not smaller Red Giants, undergo a supernova event and become Neutron Stars or Black Holes.  The new White Dwarf will have the mass equal to the size of the Earth, yet it will retain the electromagnetic field of its original G-2 class star phase.  The nebula event will most likely incinerate the planets with X-ray radiation causing sterilization on Earth, generating another extinction level event.  The shock waves will concentrically disperse the planets outwardly from the smaller cool burning White Dwarf, and Earth will become a dead frozen planet.
369983
space is not a fluid that planets need to float in it is just plain emptiness.
564113
No. Astrology is bunk.
392491
According to Big-Bang-ologists, the Universe just felt like being created and burst into existence. There is absolutely no explanation why it was created from a scientific standpoint.
424078
It is estimated that Earth is bombarded by a city-sized asteroid once every 65mil yrs.\ni) Assuming a Poisson distribution, find the probability that Earth will be hit by 2 or less of such asteroids in the next 10000yrs.\nEta Carinae is a suspected hypernova that is 7000 light-years away from Earth. Scientists have observed 200 of such star in many distant galaxies. It was found that the stars have an average life-span of 200mil years with variance 2500mil yrs^2.\nii) Construct a 95% confidence interval for the mean lifespan of Eta Carinae, giving your answer correct to 8 significant figures.\nIt was found later that Eta Carinae was formed 200.01mil yrs ago. \niii) Using the sample of 200 stars earlier, a scientist boldly claimed that Eta Carinae will explode today, causing devastation to Earth in 7000years’ time. By stating clearly the null and alternate hypothesis, test the scientist's claim at 5% level of significance.\nYou may assume the normality of the population of stars observed.
437848
There was a meteor shower the last few days, but those happen about once a month or so, with varying intensities, so nothing new there really.  I think there's no reason to think there's a correlation between your animal's behaviour and cosmic events (since there has never been shown to have a correlation before, except during solar eclipses).  Check their food or any stressful factors instead before trying to blame the universe.
340427
just your imagination, nothing scietific, good luck
363065
No, they don't.\nBrown dwarfs are failed stars.  They didn't gather enough mass when forming to start the nuclear fusion process (they never fuse hydrogen or helium contrary to what someone has said*).  They don't create a lot of energy because they don't have these nuclear reactions, that's why they are so dim.  They are basically like giant Jupiters once formed.\n\nBecause they don't do nuclear fusion they are actually more stable and should last longer than a star.  Stars die out or explode due to changes in their ability to fuse certain elements which makes them expand and collapse rapidly.  Some stars can exist then as a white dwarf (a smallish star that died- what our sun will become), these do not create energy through nuclear fusion either, but it is because they ran out of what they were massive enough to "burn" not because they were never massive enough to "burn" in the first place.\n\nIf brown dwarfs emit any energy it would be minuet amouts from tides or electrical activity.
514337
Try entering "starbursting" in your search engine. Google lists about 8700 references. In one case, starbursting is a phenomena in the eye (disorder of the eye), another refers to the star-making cycle in galaxies. It's unclear what exactly you're searching for?\n\nAnyway, try the search, and that may help give you more leads.\n\nGood luck, and have fun!
88074
Keep trying. The problem is that we know that the sun is a hydrogen reactor at very extreme temperatures. Stars need to have this nuclear process to provide the energy that they do. You mentioned that planets are the remains of burnt out stars. However, stars have a very distinct lifecycle resulting in phenomena such as super nova, red giants, white dwarfs etc. Given the ratio of planets to stars in our observable universe and timescales involved. I don't think you have thought about your proposal deep enough. As for your law - gravity is universal - all masses are subject to  gravitational influence. Given this, your water droplet is counter acting the effects of gravity due to a temperature related process. The surface temperature of the tin exhibits a hydrophobic effect. Whereas at lower temperatures the tin is no longer hydrophobic.
459496
The stars say ... No.\n\nNo, there's not.\n\nGood luck!
222384
More "New World Order" stuff. Forget it.
46146
There are no diffinitive studies.
255007
cant think of anything interesting