This stock was founded by Jonas Salk and has been around for over 20 years and has fluctuated between $100+ per share down to about .05.  I figure it is a survivor.
205372
buy it, its only 13 cents. what do you have to lose. imagine it going back up. its going to go up no matter what in like 10 years. but if it crashes you wont lose much.
653509
founded a technology company that had a small division that streamed radio broadcasts of college games over the internet.  when the primary biz failed he took the streaming business and founded broadcast.com.  broadcast.com went public at like $18 per share an rapidly traded over $300 per share.  cuban was forced to accept an offer from yahoo (his board insisted- he thought he could do better on his own and rebuffed the first offer from yahoo).  after selling to yahoo, he joined yahoo's board during which time the stock tripled.  when the yahoo execs realized what a bonehead he is- they greenmailed him to leave the board and sell his stake in yahoo.  luckily for cuban- that was near the top of the bubble and the high for yhoo.\nin the end the hobby farm part of his failed business- which never generated a profit- turned him into a billionaire.
273695
Open a SHAREBUILDER ACCOUNT - either through Sharebuilder.com in the US, or HALIFAX.co.uk in the UK.\n\nThe most important thing to remember to invest safely is DO YOUR RESEARCH BEFORE BUYING THE SHARES..... first off look up the shares at Fool.com / Fool.co.uk and look at the FORECAST figures: The EPS % figure should be at least a +percentage (going up, not down) and the figure in the P/E column should be getting less over the next couple of years. Then look at the amount of dividend being paid out + who is in charge of the company. If they have shares in the company, it means they're showing an interest in the company and it stands a good chance of succeeding. If they don't have shares in the company, it gives off hints that they don't really give a crap about the company, as long as they get their wages.\n\nInvesment suggestions (US)\nAnheuser-Busch (BUD)\nWalmart (WMT)\nUnion Pacific (UNP)\n\nInvestment Suggestions (UK):\nPipex Communications (PXC)\nBHP Billiton (BLT)\nBritish Energy (BGY)\nPlus Markets Group (PMK)\nDebtmatters (DEBT)\nHBOS (HBOS)\nWolfson (WLF)\nHold on to them for as long as possible, reinvest any dividends earned.
35656
check this webisite for more understanding\nhttp://www.investopedia.com/articles/trading/04/031704.asp
3315
There's a latest review on this site\n\nhttp://explodingstocks.com/blog/?p=19
182222
i bet you still have a few stocks in there...check it out!!!
434528
I've been with Scottrade for about ten years now... and I believe they are the best discount brokerage available.  You'll pay just $7 a trade.  You'll have resources to explore.  You can even get advice from one of their brokers, which will result in a small fee.  Bottom line: Take it from a retired stock broker... if I could invest at a better company, I'd do it!
356376
Overall, not too bad . . . you made a profit.\n\nConsidering the timeframe you are trading, I don't understand why you are referring to a an exit at 1.1006 "which looked like an important resistance".\n\nIt looked like recent resistance was ~1.1055 and sloping upwards.\n\nI would have tried to 'trade the range' of it coming down to ~1.1055 and having hat as a 'buy on stop' or not had any exit order in place, in the hope there was significant weakening due fundamental events (of which there are many these days).
166819
I can't find anything, it appears the negotiations are being kept close to the vest. I would contact a reporter familiar with the deal and just ask how things are going.\n\nBe careful, however, because Aramark is a publicly traded company and anything about its financial condition or future earnings potential would be insider information. Since any of those things could affect its stock price and knowing that in advance would be an unfair advantage.
314842
I would suggest a wait and watch. Though the corrections offer an attractive level to enter over priced shares.
343270
I've done that with what I call 'loose change'.  Sometimes I've got a few dollars sitting around, obviously not going to make a lot of interest and not large enough for something substantial.  If some risky thing has been going down but I still feel it worth holding onto (its kinda fun when you sweat over a $90 stock moving a couple of bucks while a stock selling for less than a dime now goes for a buck or two, and yes, I've had that happen), then making an extra small trade can average down the value of your position.  When the stock starts to tick up for whatever reasons, you now have a lower break-even or profit point.  Again, it is only if you've got a few bucks left not doing anything and at Scottrade for $7 plus a half-point, it doesn't hurt much.  Of course, I also got a couple that are cluttering up my list because it will cost more to sell than they are worth today but that is part of the risk, right?
635391
Most stock games require that the price of the stock be over a dollar.  Finding "killer" returns in that time is difficult.\nShock her and buy Revlon Cosmetics.  No, I am not kidding.  They are trading around $1.30 and should come back to around $1.80 in a couple of months.\nCareful, too- most of those stock games are hard to play.  The computer eats your data (like it did mine on Investopedia.com - I don't play it any more...) or the computer doesn't work at all for half the country (like it did with CNBC SquawkBox Game...).\nGood luck!
380976
Actually, it is totally up to the company as to how many shares of their stock they wish to issue.  Daniel Drew gained Wall Street renowned for issuing stock in Erie Railroad.  He coined the term "watered stock" after his previous experience of driving cattle to the market and right before placing them for sale would not give them anything to drink for 3 days and then let them drink their fill just prior to weighing them for market.  He used the same technique with Erie Railroad stock, printing up and issuing stock and throwing it on the market for investors to snap up. The technique has not been lost to Wall Street even though Daniel performed his feats during the years 1866-1867.  Today there are many stocks traded on the stock exchanges where there are virtually no net assets, but yet the stocks trade at $5, $10, even $50 a share.
392074
My thoughts are... I think I should have bought this back when it was at $1.50  when I had the chance. During this time, those  shitty analyst were downgrading this stock while the whole time they were loading up.
249524
I hope you are right about the earnings, but the stock has a PE around 18, 10-15% growth and is in the middle of its slow season.  I suspect you may need to wait another 6 months (when they report 3rd quarter earnings) for you to see much action.  Really I think its a good company, but nothing special.\n\nHowever, your feelings on it, and my feelings on it are close to meaningless.  The market as a whole is always right, and I suggest you go into stocks with the mindset.  \n\nSo, if a trade goes againist you try to find out why, when will the trade turn around, did you miss something, is there something better out there.  Learn from the trade, don't call wall street names cause wall street doesn't care - you are just wasting your breathe.
418011
Cool.\n\nIt didn't sell.....\n\n>snerk<
106128
More than likely it is not a publicly traded company, as yet. The stock information will only come from the company itself.