There seems to be a lot of discussions about George W.Bush poll ratings being very low at this point in his presidency.So, how low is to low?  And compared to which presidents of past terms???
206686
I Think Nixon Was The Only Other Pres To Come Close
136030
Look this country has never had a good president.  They all have lied, cheated and stolen to even get to be nominated.  The closest thing we have ever come to a good president was George W.  That W is for Washington.  And what was he..... a deserter and traitor in the King's army. Bush wants to be a great president by American Standards.  That means a lot of people are going to have to die. If you want to be remembered you have to kill,kill,kill.\n\nWhat president had the fewest people killed under his administration? (killed by American soldiers) Right, I don't have any idea either.
645404
I think both Bill and George have "screwed the pooch" for their prospective family members.. anyone affiliated with either the Clintons or the Bushes is now instantly polarized and I don't think they are in a position to get the key "swing votes" that would be needed... \n\nI think America is ready for change... no more Bushes or Clintons... just my opinion...
450431
I think it is a combination of many factors.  I've heard more than one person express that since experiencing Bush's Presidency they realize how good we had it under Clinton.  Also, it's sort of a wake up call when you compare what Clinton was impeached for and what Bush should be impeached for.  I don't want to see impeachment, it is a waste of time for all involved, but I do think he richly deserves it nonetheless.  People do tend to look back with fondness at some Presidents and Americans can very forgiving, depending on the circumstance and the subject.  Bill Clinton has done some great things since his Presidency ended and he stays in the public limelight.  Seeing him standing next to Bush 41 while they work together affects those ratings too.  I think we long for those in power right now to do the same.  I don't think GW should be looking for forgiveness in the future though.  I believe whether it's 10 years or 50 years after his Presidency, he will still have one of the lowest approval ratings ever recorded.
211215
It was great to hear a reasonable explanation for affairs to date. Isn't funny that president Clinton is informed and willing to talk about the affairs of the World. I watched Senator McCain this morning on Meet The Press, and he said George Bush was Stupid about the Relationship with President Putin from Russia. I about fell on the floor, he said he didn't agree or vote for Bush's policies all through Bush's terms. I know that that isn't true, but that's what was said.
304923
Yeah his approval rating really says a lot doesn't it?  Bush is going to go down as the WORST president in history.  He's an idiot, a liar, a cheater (election 2000,2004), and a rich little brat.  Without his daddy's help he wouldn't have gotten anywhere in life.  \n\nTake a look at Rolling Stone's cover!
175946
jason- are you kidding? Bush has the lowest approval rating among latin americans of any president in history. I sure hope someone does something about the current administration. Legal immigrants---get out there and vote!
300393
THE 2004 ELECTION WILL GO DOWN IN HISTORY AS THE MOST BULL CRAP ELECTION IN HISTORY.  EVEN REPUBLICANS WEREN'T TRYING TO KEEP BUSH.  ONLY HIS KGB PUPPETMASTERS (WHO GOT KERRY TO RUN A "SKULL & BONES" CAMPAIGN) GOT HIM IN.\n\nQUESTION:  DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT THE GOOFY SON OF A GOOF, GOT MORE VOTES THAN REAGAN?
344544
You're right about it not meaning 60% approval for Democrats.  That is very true and people need to remember that.\n\nYou have to remember, though, that the rating Bush has right now is bad and it shows that the majority of hte country DOESN'T approve of him, right?\n\nDemocrats have lots of problems but their problems (for the most part) aren't hindering Bush.  His choices are his own and therefore his rating is his own too.  He's earned all this that he's caused.  The question is, have our soldiers?\n\nIn all truth, if what Bush said was 100% true all the time then of course I'd get behind him.  We'd already have gotten Bin Laden and stabalized Iraq, but they've miscalculated and mistakes happened.  I know all presidents do it, but it doesn't mean we can forget Bush's failures.\n\nDon't worry, it's not like I like Clinton either.  You can't support a leader 100% all the time.  That's just not American.
19436
The reason Bush is still President is due to the fact that he has not been impeached, The reason why he was elected was because unfortunately the democrats can not come up with a reasonable candidate that can stand on issues versus hate speech. This has been demonstrated here and is another indication of republicans taking the white house again in 2008. You hear about the"lies, the half-a** answers, The bad grammar, or lack of leadership" but never examples of such. His approval rating at this time in his presidency is actually higher then Bill Clinton's was during the same time in his administration. Its a shame that a party that stood for the common man with heros such as FDR and Kennedy(JFK of course) Has turned into a bunch of people who have no dream, have no desire to build, just the ability to whine and complain. I disagree with the President on many things but what i like about him is that he does what he says he will. This is a welcome change. If democrats want the White house back, stop being afraid of being called a liberal and show people a better way, not just calling our leader(like him or not) a retard. The most important thing in order to be taken seriously is the ability to respect the differences in others and being able to debate the issues instead of name calling and threatening to move out of the USA if your opponent gets elected. (BTW im still waiting for many of Hollywood to keep their word and leave.)  Just my opinion, remember you asked and know that I respect your right to express yours.
567742
Clinton?  The best?  I can't agree with you on that, but I definitely agree with you on Bush.   Simply the worst!!
647975
2000-2005: Heck yeah.  I kept seeing him with harsh reviews, and constant attacks for no apparent reason, but from liberal sissies who literaly threatened to flee the country if Bush was elected president again.  He can't do whatever everyone wants him to do people!  Hes fallen under stress with the war in Iraq, and has been in trouble since then.  He needs support, not feedback.  Now do us a favor and can it!\n\n2006: Not at all.  I used to be a Bush supporter, as already said.  Now, my repulicanism is going down the drain, as is my hopes of this torment ending.  The war in Iraq, Neuclear threats, Anthrax, Snipers...and we even abandoned Osama Bin Laden!  For crying out loud, do you not know how our Middle East conflicts in Bushs term (Not the war in iraq, but on terrorism) started!?  Where has Osami gone to?  We would know, had Bush not set his mind elsewere
330146
Bush is one of the best presidents ever!!! A very good man. True he is not right about everything but who is. He is doing great under the circumstances. The media totally misrepresents him.
87720
Actually, since you posted your question, he has dropped to a 34% approval rating. It should be lower but the true believers vote in lockstep. \n\nIn answer to your question, I've lost a lot of faith in the "wisdom" of the American electorate after they re-elected bush/cheney in 2004. There was ample evidence of their lies and misdeeds at the time, and I really don't want to hear any more about what an awful candidate Kerry was (he certainly wasn't my choice but ANYONE would be better than what we have). \n\nSo, is the American public wiser? I don't think so. The way I see it, we're only one more "crisis" away from bush's poll numbers soaring again. Another large-scale terrorist attack in the "homeland" and it's break out the flags and rally around "our" president yet again. \n\nThe last time this obscenity occurred, I went to live and work in Japan for two years. It was refreshing to be amongst ex-pat Americans, Canadians, Brits, Aussies and Kiwis who had a clue about world politics. If it happens again, I'll be off to the UK -- for good.\n\nThat said, it would really be nice to have our country back, wouldn't it?
184389
thats what most people do.  In america we contridict everything.  President bush's approval rating was the highest of any president ever at 96% after he said we are going to was after 9/11.  Then we went and people started dieing then people relized the reality and his approval rating went down to 46%.  the right man will always lead this country.  we just need to stop critque things after the happen and pointing fingers.\n\nMatt
433793
I'm a repulican and I don't think he will be considered a good president. I don't think he is a good president. When he was Governor of Texas, he was a very good Governor. He bult a lot of new roads (which we needed), he imporved education and was very good at reaching across the aisle to democrats. Our Lt. Governor was Bob Bullock(a democrat) and he endorsed Bush for Prez. I don't know what happened to him once he reached Washington.
604830
Although I think Bush is a poor president in key areas, DJ seems to have some really good points.  I'll acknowledge that Bush is a man of action and that many of his actions especially right after 911 were on target.   However,\n\nWhen it comes to his overall leadership, he is missing several of the most important leadership qualities.  #1: Communication skills.  Without any doubt he will go down as the anti-thesis of Reagan who was our "great communicator"  Bush couldn't convince the devil: the qualities of an airconditioner, and he's from Texas.  He makes everyone I know cringe when he speaks - even my conservative friends can't stand this fatal flaw of his presidency.  \n\n2nd - he makes up his mind quickly and never changes it - good quality after 911 for a while, but he can't adapt and overcome.  When he's wrong - he won't admit it - ever.  (No real plan to win the peace in Iraq after the regime was overthrown - and 3 years later - still no real plan -  not willing to work with the U.N. peacekeeping forces as a legitimate transfer of power in the region)\n3rd flaw - he's appointed some inefficient lack luster people to key positions in the government - FEMA, Treasury, Attorney General, CIA, Defense, State Dept. and the Supreme Court, to name a few apparently unimportant areas.  Many of these people couldn't run a horse show let alone a key gov't agency.\n\nIt's time for new leadership - impeachment is very unlikely.  Lets get someone next time that at least knows how to speak English clearly- and that has true leadership qualities.