I want to know if it is possible to have peacefull industrial\nnuclear enegry without the possibility to make bombs
217340
well obviously you know that one isotope is weapons grade and one is not.  the iranians want the isotope that can be dismantled into nuclear weapons because thats what they plan on doing with it...  the United Nations offered to give them the alternative nulcear energy isotope plant but they refuse... they want the weapons grade, wonder why?
202276
no, actually it would become pure mass. you will be adding infinite energy and that energy will transform into mass so you would have an ever stretching train, and of course it will break into pieces and the pressures will make the train explode making it energy... so changing my original answer, if your train is breakable, it will turn into pure energy, it will burst into pieces destroying the railroad and everything around it ^^
228566
World War One Hundred Eleven is going to be here quicker than anyone expects, I know. Ha, I know you mean WW3 (WWIII). Anyway, If it is a nuclear war, there really won't be much refuge since the radiation will spread around the globe. We will need radiation suits etc, and no one is ready for that right now. There is a book, I think it is called "On the Beach" and it is about nuclear war, it's good I remember. Anyway, there is no need to be worried. Do not worry about things that you cannot control. There is nothing you can do about it unless you plan on being a 007 and sneaking overseas and disabling their bombs, but I doubt a top-secret agent would be posting on YAHOO!
345454
I think it very likely that some people will survive.  We have a great track record of tolerating and adapting to some pretty extreme conditions.  I expect there are some secret hideaways that would even allow a few folks to survive a "nuclear winter" scenario, and start repopulating without the technology.  Obviously, any less serious scenario will allow even more flexibility for means of survival.  Right now, today, I do not believe there is a practical possibility of more than two nuclear devices being detonated -- those few who might be otherworldly enough to use them do not, praise Allah and thank God, have the means to use more.  The tragic military, political, economic, and environmental consequences would immediately and eventually kill tens of millions of people, perhaps hundreds of millions, and alter the conditions of life for the billions remaining..  but "billions remaining" is a great lot of survivors to be tolerating and adapting to conditions.  We'll manage.
24789
Well, peace is always good since it prevents the unecessary death of others.  War would be good if you run a major corporation and can profit off it.
182736
No.If there was we would use nuclear energy.It is not and never was a workable energy source because of the hazards and waste.
250356
Duck and cover according to the 1950s civil defense videos.\n\nWe maneuver around the irradiated areas.  not everywhere is blown up.\n\nNot everything is blown up in even the largest nuclear war.  Many of the bombs would blow up in the same spot to ensure they were not shot down.  Life would suck but you would be alive.
501050
I got interesting answers to this question and it may be the only time I gave a Shiraz best answer\n\nHEY, you people who advocate "nuking". Do you know the effects of nuclear bombs?
320818
We all know that if they have the nuclear tech the bomb will be used to destroy many people....if they are really concerned  about energy (especially electrical) solar energy will be great for that part of the world...I am sure the U.S.A will help in this project.
63450
try this website, I just did a search and this came up:\n\nhttp://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq5.html
485489
The only way this would work is.. If you buy a Island beside lets say America. America will come over and try to make you pay taxes and obey their laws. You then develop your own country and break away from America. Now America isn't gona be nice about this so you will need a nuke to get to back up off you.
6975
You could make a cloud chamber. It's a chamber that's saturated with alcohol vapor so when a cosmic ray or radioactive particle enters the chamber it leaves a trail of mist like when a plane leaves a vapor trail. It does use dry ice and isopropyl alcohol though. It's kind of complicated but would be worth it in the end.
358987
That's not renewable. You just demonstrated that perpetual motion is feasible! Hello Nobel! Can I get in on this?
74957
Yes but use it for peaceful purpose.\nPakistan
233581
Yes I believe it is true.  The extreme heat generated by the initial detonation was sufficient to vaporise organic matter such as people.  A prompt blast wave accompanying this immense 'fireball' would typically blast down most structures.  However, I did hear rumours that at the point of vaporisation these vapours were absorbed into walls, etc.. This would give the impression of a 'shadow' effect when really its not a shadow.. its vaporised people / organic matter.  \n\nSuch a topic is a little sensative (clearly) so be careful where you ask on this one.  The effective range at which this would happen is in close proximity to ground zero.  Beyond this people would combust due to the heat before being blasted by the shockwave (which can flatten buildings).  Outside this I heard reports of peoples eyes melting out of their sockets which makes sense due to the soft tissue nature of them.\n\nOf cause theres also the radioactive fallout which is pretty nasty in the way of being a big time carcinogen.\n\nAll in all Nuclear bombs aint so pretty.  You might also like to look into the neutron bomb which I think was a varient of the typical fission bomb.  I believe it was designed to maximise casualties and minimise structural damage to buildings but I'm not sure..
636820
Visit the following page and got answers of your questions.\nhttp://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/bomber/b-52.htm\nHowever if you join the air force kindly avoid bombing of my home. (I am homeless)
12684
It all depends on the country and the number of missiles with the nuclear warheads on them. It the country only had about 10 bomb it would definitely be possible. A country like Russia or China with 1000s of warheads it would be nearly impossible.