I tried to scan the net, but couldn't find any Useful definition or pros and cons of this issue,- Please anyone who has ever dealed with this topic- send any info or links on useful sites and documents on Globalisation.\nThanks = )
218318
Here are a few resources to get you started:\n\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalization\nhttp://www.globalresearch.ca/\nhttp://www.globalpolicy.org/globaliz/index.htm\nhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/globalisation/story/0,,823274,00.html\nhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/globalisation/story/0,,823097,00.html\nhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/globalisation/story/0,,823296,00.html\nhttp://globalisationguide.org/
224870
Here's some articles I found. Hope they help.\n\nRegards
307707
The bottom line is it is about the all mighty dollar.  Maintaining access to foreign goods means that our government feels a need to exhaust our resources to "make nice" with other countries to help them with their strife--at the sacrifice of our own needs.  Sure there are some of the richest people on the planet here, but not all.  There are also a lot of severely impoverished as well.  We need to get our priorities straight as a nation.
122423
First define what you mean by globalization. If you mean material wealth then no. However, I would think that the more mankind interacts with one another that we can't help but evolve religion as any structure within our societys. That's assuming that you view religion that way and not as some sort of absolute doctrine that shouldn't change.
482085
I agree. Many governments (Hong Kong, UAE and others) feel the need to keep the overseas contract workers under their oppressive control and violate their basic human rights. Only global condemnation and action can have some impact.\n\ncc
525111
There has been an increase in globalization in the United States as well as in rest of the world. This has resulted in many good things as well a lot of economic dislocation and unemployment.  It is not completely evil as you seem to assume. Read Thomas Friedman's "The Lexus and the Olive Tree".\n\ncc
283439
it doesn't. Its not suppose to overcome it. It's at this point where all different cultures should be open to diversity and respect differences...and actually embrace it. We could learn so much from each other. And the answer to your other question...yes, i think it does contribute to the rise, because globalisation threatens diversity. globalisation is trying to make the world smaller and identical. When our identity's as different cultures, different religions are threatened, we would fight harder to keep it
106946
Go to: www.findarticles.com.\nEnter: global economy in the search box.\nDoing this search, I came up with more than 1800 articles.
437779
Surely it is a good stuff. Only concern on invading privacy of a country or person. Global Earth Technology, in my opinion to focus on narrowing the gap between poor and rich by supporting each other with necessary development need. Seeing is believing..
618733
A while ago I read a book outlining the good nationalistic reasons for large populations and immigration. In a nutshell, the premis was that out of every million people or so,  you may get statistically the one person who will save the world with their particular talent, skill or intelligence. The Franklins, Gates, Buffetts or Whitneys etc. Problem is, it turns out that you gotta take in a lot of chaff to get to the straw which hides the one needle in this giant haystack of potential, positive outcome.\nThis approach is kinda of a forgone conclusion in our form of government according to this reading. The gov. guys don't REALLY care bout  most of us peons most of the time. What they care about is the one person who will be the reason the world goes forward in a positive way for (in this case) the USA. We are stuggling with China currently, who has so many people, they may get the next Person of persons on the planet, who will make the world theirs or their country's the premier civilization.\nIt's a numbers game. The more you have the more likely you will come up a winner. \nKinda like Vegas? No?\nMove over and make room for that illegal JuanCarlos, He/JuanCarlos might be the next Jesus Christ!\nDon't freak, I'm just kidding!
116519
It appears to be in relation to energy production.  I have referenced a hyperlink to a PDF file that refers to this term with in its context...the file does have some English translation.
440966
Dear Jessie,\n\nAre you looking for thesis title suggestions?\n\nHow about:\n(a) The conquest and occupation of Iraq by America is neccessary/unneccesary for the stability of the Middle East.\n\n(b) The crisis at North Korea is a threat to the stability of the Asia Pacific region.\n\n(c) The bird flu is a health risk to the human race due to the advancement of global transportation capability.\n\n(d) Global climate changes are due to man-made influences on the environment.\n\n(e) China is now called the world's factory, can this stay true for the long term?
320937
A 56 percent majority of world citizens are opposed to globalization, believing that it creates more problems than it solves. Among Greeks, 72 percent of the respondents are in agreement with that opinion. Thus the Greek people can be said to be anti-globalization  by a wide majority.\n\nThere is also a strong streak of radical left wing politics in Greece which has long been virulently Anti-American and has now added anti-globalization as a natural continuation.\n\nMuch of the anti-globalization sentiment comes from the fact that Greece is a tiny country with a language that spoken by almost no one outside of Greece other than Greek immigrants. It is easy for Greeks to view their culture as being potentially swamped by globalization.\n\nThe Greek government is a bit more level headed about the issue and understands that Greece needs integration into the world economy, the adoption of international standards, and cooperation with international bodies.
463950
I read it as:\n\nHow does using the natural products (i.e. oil, crops) that a less developed nation has (naturally) by a big company effect the less developed nation?  Is it wrong for the big guy to do this to the little guy?  How does it effect the little guy?  Is it fair for either side?
517319
You are 100% right. For too long now, successive UK governments have put too much emphasis on playing the global stage at the sake of their own people. I suspect it's a glamour thing and they want to make their mark in world history.
459730
I think I would show the statistics for "people studying Chinese in the US is drastically on the rise" and information on the WTO.  I would spell out US (United States), WTO (World Trade Organization), and HK (Hong Kong).  Why do you think the trend toward learning Chinese, French, or German is on the rise among young Chinese Americans?  There are a few points you could elaborate upon with statistics or background information.
511275
Here is a good treatment on it:\n\nhttp://qhr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/13/7/893.pdf