We have a filter section and a report section.\n\nWe have a top section (filter) where the user can do some selections (Drop down boxes). This drop down box has like 4 or 5 options in it. Based upon selection, we show them another list (Combo box) which has typically 200 to 300 options. Each of this combo box is wrapped up in a div and using javascript (onChange event) and DOM,  we change the display property to none or block (CSS properties). The user can see around 3 options in the combo box. It takes a long time for the browser (IE only) to render just the filter. \n\nWe have a table in the report section showing 200-300 rows. I have the table-layout set to fixed so that the browser does not have to compute the widths and the user can see the table before it is completly rendered. If one of the cells in each row is  a drop down box with 10 options, the rendering latency is huge. I know we could use div's but we cant at the moment.\n\nAny suggestions? Our browser has and will always be IE.
201656
If you do not populate the list with DOM and have all elements be static (generated by a server side program, perhaps), the rendering time should be slowest.\n\nIE is not very good at rendering complex or big things.
56208
why not just have 2 pages, the page that you want the main table on that you want them to view and then have the other table on the 2nd page with a link to it.\n\nIf you are really dieing to have them both on the same page you could possibly try and make one table invisible until they click on the anchor or something to that effect ( might require some javascript or something like that ) probably just easier to have 2 pages :) imho - im sure someone else might be able to come up with a better answer though :)\n\nwould be worth while checking out :\n\nwww.htmlgoodies.com\n\nwww.w3schools.com
165299
It has AJAX Interface and is quite awesome. It is like using outlook to check your mail, only it works inside a browser. I Have heard that since it is in Beta phase it is slow on Dial up connections and several other browsers. It runs fine for me on Internet Explorer 6 and doest not run at all on Internet Explorer preview 7, FireFox 1.5 or Opera. You can search you can see the interface pictures and read information on it from here: http://yahoo.weblogsinc.com/2005/09/14/review-new-yahoo-mail-beta/
584354
Hey.\nIf you want to really get your page really layed out the way you want, you will have to use tables.\n\nDraw the entire layout using tables (probably in dreamweaver) and then drag and drop controls where you want.\n\nAs for the login control, you will need to set up a database in the backend and let asp.Net 2 create the necessary tables it needs.\nWe use SQL Server for this.\n\nYou can do it with access I guess, but I wouldn't recommend it.\nTo set up asp properly (make it create the tables and stuff for membership), run this command from the Visual Studio 2005 command prompt : \naspnet_regsql
550459
You could use the JavaScript onmouseover and onmouseout events (onfocus and onblur don't work so well b/c the user has to click on the menu again after is has been resized).\n\nTry something like this, replacing the 50px/150px values with your own widths...\n\n<select style="width: 50px;" onmouseover="this.style.width = '150px';" onmouseout="this.style.width = '50px';">
566670
The site you mentioned is most likely using server side includes.  \n\nUsing includes, they can have 1 file that holds the navigation and then update just that 1 file when they need to.  The menu would appear as updated on every page as you view it.\n\nAnother way is to use templates.  If you are using dreamweaver you can create a template or library file that holds then menu and then include that section in each page you build. \n\nWhen you need to update the menu, just update that one file and tell dreamweaver to update all files with that element in it.\n\nOther Web editing programs can handle templates as well.\nI believe that contribute also can edit templates.\n\nhttp://www.adobe.com/devnet/dreamweaver/templates.html\n\nhttp://www.adobe.com/devnet/dreamweaver/articles/dw_templates.html\n\nhttp://www.adobe.com/devnet/contribute/articles/templates_macrochat.html
108169
You can use simple javascript to do it for you.  Do a search on 'javascript player' and you have tons of info.
614827
mine (dropdown menu) opened up into a new window allowing me to choose from a variety of options.  i don't know if it depends on the version of firefox you're running... but i find myself spending more and more time using mozilla and less with microflop every day.  since the toolbar is so versatile, i'm sure there's a way to change the search engine settings as well.  firefox's hallmark seems to be 'versatility'.\n\nps::: i'm not hiding anything either!
332482
If you want to create forms to be seen only on screen, you must take in account of your display resolution.\n\nI believe Access has wizards to make different types of forms.\n\nIf you want to make them manually, you must go to Forms>Design View. Then go to menu View>Properties. In the Record Source (First Line of Properties Window) search for the Table or Query you want the Form to rely on. Go to View>Field List. Than drag the fields into the Form. In the Property Window there's all sorts of settings to the fields Data Format, Color, etc.)\n\nMakiavel
78470
Well, asp.net output gets converted to HTML when being displayed by the client so it doesn't matter what you use - you need to know how to design with CSS to avoid using tables.\n\nWe just did a tableless site at work for a client.  The registration form that I did (in asp.net 2.0) can be seen in the link below.  \n\nThe only difficult part was getting the output to render properly in both IE and Mozilla because the asp.net engine will render some tags differently based upon it's own browser detection (such as using a SPAN for mozilla but a DIV for IE).\n\nIf you're just starting out, I'd highly recommend using HTML tables until you get more experience with CSS and table-less design.
223659
The simple answer is no.\n\nYou can use some built in module, they have many theme's, page view count etc, but can't use others.
462540
********************************************\n\nI have Office 2000, so these instructions may or may not be the same for your version.\nThe easiest way for me is to first know how many rows and columns I need. Then I right click and hold the button down while moving the mouse over the rows and columns I want included in the table. For example: If i want a table that is 4 columns wide, I would select A through D. Then, while still holding the right click down, I select the rows that I want. If I want 10 rows down, I select 1 through 10. After they are all selected in blue, I release the right button on the mouse. The rows and columns selected should remain highlighted.\n\nNext at the top of the page there should be a grid of squares button to select. If there isn't, you can find the little arrows button to find more buttons. It will be in there. Click it or the little arrow pointing down beside it for more selections. This will give you a grid and different types of line thicknesses.\n\nIf you can't find it this way, then after highlighting the areas you want included, right click again in the middle of a highlighted square and another window will open. Click 'Format Cells' in the box that opens. Next click the 'Border' tab. Then choose the formatting you want. You can do this more than once to get more than one effect on your table.\n\nIf none of this is what you want to do, then go to Microsoft Templates at this link: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/templates/default.aspx\nThere are as many templates there as there are hours that you have to look through them. You can do a search for the specific type of table you want. After you download the template (these are small files) you can customize it how you want it after you open it.\n\nHope this helps. Good luck.\n\n****************************************************
575407
<style type="text/css">\ntd.text td.text table table table, td.text td.text table br, td.text td.text table .orangetext15, td.text td.text .redlink, td.text td.text span.btext {display:none;}\ntd.text td.text table {background-color:transparent;}\ntd.text td.text table td, td.text td.text table {height:0;padding:0;border:0;}\ntd.text td.text table table td {padding:3;}\ntd.text td.text table table br {display:inline;}\n</style>\n\n\nput this code at the bottom of your, who i would like to meet, section, then your top 8 will be hidden
364730
Yup!\n\na simple little javascript command (that few people use!) is dependent on the way the browser designers decide to do it!\n\nThere is no standard for placement... You can get a lot better compatibility with AJAX (the domscripting part) techniques.\n\nCool sites pop 'windows 'right in the middle of the main page... \n\nI use jquery(a javascript library) to do this type thing, so can you!
570389
Since this is coming from the database and it's a very long word entered by a user you probably won't be able to "wrap" it in the element.\n\nIf you set widths for the element, IE will expand the element and firefox will have the text overlap the element.\n\nYou could truncate the word or phrase returned to a number of characters either when you pull it from the database or when you display it on the page.\n\nIn MS SQL it's\nLEFT ( character_expression , integer_expression ) \n\nso \nLEFT (columName, 15)\n\nwould give you 15 characters of the contents within ColumnName\n\n(You could also limit the entry of the column to 15 characters)\n\nOR you can use your scripting language to do the same thing.\n\nthen use an if statement to see if the characters in columnName value is more than 15 characters.  some pseudo code here:\n\nif characters in columName > 15 {\n   output '...';\n}\n\nso you get\n\nThisIsVeryLongW...\n\nIf your long words are in the middle of a phrase and you can't truncate the whole phrase, it's going to be more difficult to make it fit.  You might want to consider changing the design.\n\n-------------\nedit\n------------\n\nIn CSS3, there is word-wrap:break-word which might help but I'm not sure of the support\n\nThere is also the tag <wbr> and & shy; which might help as well if you can calculate where to put them.
62505
I can't beleive your still using IE. Firefox is much better and faster. got to mozilla.com it is a free browser and with the "fasterfox" extention you will be surprised at the speed. (firefox does read html slightly differntly so on a small percentage of websites, the page is displayed slightly differently)
71747
You've put it inside a Hard-coded width TABLE. You'll only get the scrollbars if you specify a WIDTH and/or HEIGHT that is smaller than the amount of stuff you want to put int the IFRAME.\n\nTry the following:\n<IFRAME SRC="http://www.yahoo.com" height=100 width=300></IFRAME>\n\nYou will get scrollbars in both directions