article II in Philippine Constitution
206248
ARTICLE II of the Philippine constitution is entitled "Declaration of Principles and State Policies".
15767
if you do know, its not the Philippines who agreed to that VFA, that was decided by only chosen people from among Filipinos. they do agree to that, for personal reasons and purposes.
84633
the list contains 1,526 names!\n\nbetter check the list yourself at the Philippine Supreme Court web site:\n\nhttp://www.supremecourt.gov.ph/bar/Bar2005.htm
348949
1. a. Declaration of Independance\n    b. Articles of the confederation\n    c. Bill of Rights\n    d. Constitution\n  (these are a few of them)\n\n2. a. Alexander Hamilton \n    b. Ben Franklin\n    c. George Washington\n    d.James McHenry\n    e. David Brearley
273666
The Bill of Rights is a part of the Constitution.
36544
People Power 1 happened during the Marcos regime when President Ferdinand Marcos declared Martial Law and established himself as dictator of the Philippines. The people rose up against him in a peaceful protest where nuns, priests, children, and basically ordinary people stood in front of and blocked the tanks and soldiers who were about to ambush Camp Crame, the headquarters of the rebellion against Marcos.\n\nPeople Power 2, however, was not as noble. Elected President Joseph Estrada was accused of graft and corruption and the people wanted him impeached. His trial, as well as the protest pushing for his impeachment in front of the Edsa Shrine, was televised for almost the whole day everyday. The trial itself seemed to be dubious and the people seemed to be using the effect and influence of the first People Power in the wrong way. But in any case Estrada was impeached, he fled the country, and Vice President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo became president.
73367
The Filipino Constitution III § 5 states, "No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil or political rights."  Wikipedia has an entry on the separation of church and state in the Philippines, along with references to commentary on the Constitution of 1987 and its intent.
500754
If this is for an essay and you have time for research then you use a treatise on constitutional law. There are also resources online.\n\nThe US Supreme Court rules on the federal constitution. State supreme courts (in NYS the Court of Appeals -- their supreme court is the lowest court of general jurisdiction, following English practice) rule on state constitutions. Here's an example where a state law on double jeopardy was stricter than the federal rule: http://www.uniset.ca/naty/maternity/192P2d449.htm (in federal practice, two different sovereigns can prosecute the same offense, California law (only) is different).\n\nCiting a US Supreme Court case is easy. You go to http://www.lexisone.com (free registration required) or to http://justia.us (uses Google searching rules which may be more familiar to you) and you look for what you want -- key words, etc. Supreme Court cases are cited in the pattern "Smith v. Jones, 123 U.S. 456 (19XX)".\n\nMost Supreme Court constitutional law cases are famous: Roe v. Wade (abortion), Loving v. Viriginia (miscegenation), Lawrence v. Texas (sodomy), Miranda v. Arizona (right to warnings upon arrest), Gideon v. Wainwright (right to counsel). And so on.
503456
This might help you...\n\nhttp://www.edict.com.hk/vlc/clauses/participleclause.htm
657087
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
166891
the second amendment.
318589
www.pcg.org/pdf/bylaws.pdf
329374
The doctrine that you're speaking of actually says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."  The US Supreme Court expanded on that, realizing that the doctrine in the Constitution had no "teeth" without clarification.  In other words, they expanded it from Congress not being able to make a law *establishing* one (ie. a national religion) to include Congress not being able to make laws favoring a particular religion over another (or over a non-religion).  Who the people vote for is an entirely different matter.  First, the doctrine applies to laws and legislation.  Secondly, it would be utterly unconstitutional to disallow anyone not specifically defined in the Constitution from running for office.  The people of the U.S. have the absolute right to cast their vote for whomever they choose, as long as that person has the requisite citizenship and has attained the mandated age.
534397
by the government of A.P
417754
Here you go: \n\nhttp://www.usconstitution.net/const.html\n\nhttp://www.azleg.state.az.us/Constitution.asp\n\nNow all you have to do is read and then contrast and compare. Have fun.
8517
The constitution specifically says, "The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate."\n\nThey clearly anticipated these amendments modifying the original document. In fact, many of the amendments have revised the original. Changing the election of Senators and Representatives to popular election, changing the way the number of representatives was calculated, changing the day Congress convenes, and allowing income tax are just a few of the major revisions to the original that have come about by the amendments.
338892
I am sure that article two section one is referring to an article and section of the US Constitution.