In what ways in their ideas differ the most, specially in the view of law?
203995
Karl Marx ideas come from Historic Materialism, and dialectic, where the destiny of Humanity is already written, Emile Durkheim gave more chance to the free will of society to have an impact.
199660
law and justice are sometimes in conflict. justice is meted out according to lifestyles, ethnicity ,political affliations,gender,social standings,wealth, to name a few.however the law must prevail in order to be in a civilized society.law must prevail .take your luck on justice.
226659
techinically, they dont play a part in politics.  their life terms were designed so that they did not have to be bothered with public opinion and the day to day changes in politics.  their only goal is to interpret what the constitution says.  supreme court cases dont change nearly as often as laws do, mainly for the fact that the courts value precident and broad interpretations than what is right or good for the country.
86913
Veeery generaly speaking, the Left (liberal) and Right (conservative) of politics came out of the French Revolution.\n\nAt that time, the Left was more concerned with laws that protect people's rights, and the conservatives are more concerned with laws that protect property.  \n\nFrom this, the traditional Liberal and Conservatives have arisen.  No one politican or person exemplifies what the TRUE definition of the words are, but issue by issue, the sides of politics have been created by these factions.\n\nIf you ask me, the terms liberal and conservative are meaningless, because they can't capture the entire persons views, and a person who describes themselves as a dem, repub, liberal or conservative is doing an injustice to the political process.\n\nAll politicians agree that its not about sides, its about issues.  Not about teams, its about debate and progress.
552260
Statutues are Acts of Parliament. They are debated through the houses and eventually they receive royal assent. The courts have to abide by statutes but can interpret in different ways. \n\nCommon law is the law that is not statute based, think of it as case law, when a case is decided the legal element generally become binding on all courts lower than the court making the decision. \n\nAgree with everyone else just get a bisic law textbook and you will find a more comprehensive explaination
313045
Laws bind within the territory.  Laws from one place do not attach to the person when the person leaves the jurisdiction.\n\nThere are some obvious exceptions, for example, when one state recognizes the jurisdiction and acts of another, like marriage.
480055
The thing you have to remember about law is that is can be a very fluid concept.  And there are always loop holes.
434648
How about Darwinism vs Creationism taught in schools, or stem cell research, or legalizing illegal immigrants who have been here for over 25 years? All of these issues are currently not answerable for lawyers and there is not a law that is consistant in all 50 states for any of them.
3024
I dont really see a difference. Surely there is differences . Like most of the time judges marry in court houses or their preferred spot. I'm not sure what the judge says, but i'm guessing its pretty similar to what a priest says in his church.
338730
We have every conceivabe law available already, it`s how they are implemented and interpreted, that`s where the trouble starts. Too much law and not enough justice. It seems that the demands of the elite few are being addressed long before the needs of the many. It`s upside down if you ask me.
121768
Civil Law, Natural Law, and the Law of the Peoples.
62264
The only difference is how the law treats them.\n\nSome offenses are illegal and stupid. Some are just stupid.
337417
see some people look at laws very different than i do i think laws are here to protect usand to keep this contry safe and some people think they are dumb rules. really it depends on the way u see them
118370
Laws are subjective.  Laws are a GUIDELINE to live.  Some laws aren't specific because legislation to pass specific laws either gets caught up in red tape or the person who submitted it for review didn't give enough proof that their point should be made into a law.\n\nMost laws DO protect you and your property.  But for every minute action there has to be a minute law to cover it and there are just too many small actions. (minute = small)
279713
Try to compare and contrast thes cultures ideas: table manners, food, general political view. (Try using a venn diagram when you take notes)
168901
Karl Marx argued that the law is a self serving tool for the upperclass.\n\nThe legislature and judiciary, predominantly, are composed of rich white males. These rich white males are unlikely ever to  make law that conflicts with their interests, so based on Marx's arguement, you could question whether any law is not sexist or racist!\n\nSorry, for the massively indirect answer... i am not american and my knowledge on american law is scrappy, but the arguement above is a feminist arguement and also the critical race theory! - something to think about!
133918
In one sense you bring up an interesting point.  Let me challenge you with a broader concept...\n\n...do our Laws reflect our Morality....or does Morality stem from the Laws we make each other abide by?\n\nIn their written series of civilization, Will and Ariel Durant made the point in the first book, "Our Oriental Heritage", that man did not need or make laws until he thought his neighbor needed them.\n\nThink on that a bit as you ponder your own question.\n\nIn my own personal opinion, I do believe that faith can and should inform public policy.  In a republic such as ours, we have agreed to abide by the majority, until a new majority comes into being.  And each new majority will bring its' own set of values.