http://www.petitiononline.com/straycow/\n\nThe Delhi HC in 2002/2003/2004 has ordered / directed the Delhi government to: \n\n01) cancel the licence of a dairy or cattle shed in case the cattle belonging to it stray out of its dairy's or cattle shed's premises. \n\n02) prosecute the stray cattle owners who let their cattle roam the city streets freely, under Section 289 of the Indian Penal Code. \n\n03) disconnect water and power connections to all illegal dairies and cattle sheds (April, 15, 2004). \n\nThe section 289 IPC provides a minimum jail term of six months and maximum of one year and imposes a fine ( for/on each animal/stray ) on the owner if he fails to prevent his cattle/animal from causing any "probable" danger to human life, or a probable danger of grievous hurt to any other person. \n\nIn July/August 2005 the Delhi HC directed/ordered the Delhi Police to use Section 133 Cr.P.C. [Criminal Procedure Code] (for removal of nuisance or illegal dairies or cattle sheds).
210770
No, forget it, won't happen.
187700
I have a relitive (inlaw) that comes from India, and I have been to India, so I will try to answer this question based on what I know.\n\n1. To the person that said their is no McDonalds in India... your wrong, yes India does have McDonalds, and it serves every thing ours does but Hamburger is soy, no beef, only soy.\n2. to the person who said you cant eat cow in India - your wrong too. You can eat cow, but it isnt common at all, and it is very difficult to find a place that makes it. I know of one place in Punjob where you can get it. \n3. India has more Pasture south then any other place. They have tons of villiges so that is alot of pasture. India has pasture, but in certian places only.\n4. The cattle are free in India- I can remember driveing down the road in Delhi (a city) and cow's walking next to the car. They dont have to worry about being eatten, they do as they please, including holding up traffic.\nIn America we dont allow our Cattle to be free, so we control how many cow's we have, but in India their is no control because cows are "free".\n\nIndia is a very intresting place to visit. to live their is very difficult because it's simply to hot, but an awsome place to visit.
255785
G.R. No. L-44678 April 8, 1986\n\nFRANCISCO BALIGWAT, petitioner, \nvs.\nHON. COURT OF APPEALS and ALBINO ESTAVOS, respondents.\n\nRamon P. Mabanag for petitioner. \n\nDulcisimo Tampus for private respondent. \n\n \n\nPATAJO, J.:\n\nIn this petition for review of the decision of the then Court of Appeals dated July 20, 1976, petitioner, the tenant of private respondent over 1 1/2 hectares land devoted exclusively to coconut trees, seeks a ruling from this Court that personal cultivation by the landowner, one of the grounds for the dispossession of a tenant under Section 50 of Republic Act 1199, otherwise known as the Agricultural Tenancy Act of the Philippines, had been repealed by Section 7 of Republic Act 6389, and that, therefore, he could not be ejected from the landholding in question on the alleged ground that the landowner wanted to cultivate the land himself personally. The decision of the Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the Court of Agrarian Reforms which denied the motion to dismiss filed by petitioner of the complaint to eject him from the landholding in question, said Court holding that Section 7 of Republic Act 6389 amending Section 36 of the Code of Agrarian Reforms of the Philippines, Republic Act 3844 deleting personal cultivation by the lessor-owner as ground for dispossessing the tenant-lessee does not apply to coconut lands. \n\nThe undisputed facts of this case is stated by the Court of Appeals in its decision subject of the present petition for review as follows: \n\nDefendant Francisco Baligwat is the tenant of plaintiff Albino Estavas over one and one-half hectares of his coconut land in Pualas, Tubod, Lanao del Norte, Estavas wanted to eject Baligwat because he wanted to cultivate the land personally, so he notified the defendant of his desire to personally cultivate the land one year before he filed this case on April 4, 1972 by sending a letter (Exhibit 'B') written on February 7, 1971, addressed to the defendant at Pualas, Tubod, Lanao del Norte. He mailed that letter by ordinary mail and the defendant received it through the Barrio Captain. He also complied with the requirements of law to inform the Court regarding his desire to personally cultivate the land as shown by a copy of the notice he filed in Court, (Exhibit 'C') received on February 15, 1971 (Exhibit 'C-l').\n\nAfter one year, he sent another letter to the defendant re-minding him that after February, 1972, the latter was to vacate the premises (Exhibit 'D'). Because the defendant did not vacate the premises, plaintiff filed his petition in this case on April 4, 1972 (Exhibit 'E'). \n\nEstavas wanted to personally cultivate the land because he had no job and he has had experience as farmer of the coconut land of his father. The entire area of the coconut land is 26 hectares. The tenanted area of the said land is one hectare and a half. Plaintiff has four children all of majority age, with children of their own. He wants to cultivate personally the area of one and a half hectares use the rest of the 26 hectares are cultivated by his children who are all farmers, including the only one of them who is employed and who visits the place every month. Four hectares of the land were acquired by his wife and the other portions were acquired by him and his wife. He has a house on the land in question. Three of his children have their own houses on the portions of land they are occupying and cultivating. \n\nWe are in full agreement with the holding of the Court of Appeals upholding the Court a quo that insofar as coconut lands are concerned, personal cultivation by the owner-lessor, a ground for dispossession of the tenant-lessee under Section 50 of Republic Act 1199, is still a valid ground for dispossession of a tenant. This is so because Section 35 of Republic Act 3844 expressly provides that with respect to lands principally planted to citrus, coconuts, cacao, durian and other similar permanent
429772
Well spotted sofiarose - that one passed me by too - and I like to think I keep an 'eagle-eye' on what they do (by getting daily e-mail updates from http://www.epolitix.com/ which includes the name of legislation to be debated, but not a description of the content).\n\nExcellent article although somewhat out of date (February) and misleading - thank you.\n\nAs of 8 November 2006 the beast became an Act of law.  It's already on the statute books as the "Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006" (2006 Ch. 51).\n\nI've had a quick look at it, and it's no-where near as bad as this LibDem MP makes out - he was scaremongering, unless it has been watered down from its original form.\n\nTake a look at it yourselves......
665848
Its totally barbaric and unneccessary. The people who kill these fabulous creatures have either never had an education or are beyond education. It should be a global crime to destroy these placid and un hostile mammals and anyone found doing so, should receive a long prison sentence...or maybe a harpoon up the a*se to how it feels......nuff said, soap box away.
86207
Try Animal Control or the Board of Health.
175240
No.  This is a false representation of the hindu religion.  They consider the cow to be a sacred animal because of it's milk.  It being related to the mother's milk, thus life sustenance.
266656
In Texas it is illegal for one to shoot a buffalo from the second story of a hotel.  Also the Encyclopedia Brittanica is banned.\nsee: http://www.dumblaws.com
323174
I think it is a local Council issue rather than a Legislative issue (unless you disturb the peace or litter).\n\nCheck with the Local Council to see if you need a permit or if there is a voluntary code of practice.\n\nGood luck
326521
Without being too invasive or rude, I dont really know what is going on in dheli. There are people driving their cars, vans and lorries at top speed, beeping their horns and going thru red lights, and you are worried about a move towards communism? Did you ever stop to think that maybe communism is EXACTLY what India needs to become the rich, prosperous country we all know it can be. Its the corrupt government that let india down. Look at places like chadigarah - a communist state - one of the most beautiful cities in india. There is no welfare state - that means no government support for unemployed, sick or poor. Fix up and take a stand. As a british born Indian woman - I wish i could do more to help my motherland become then best it can be.
64414
You can call them and ask :\nTheir address is : 31-32 begumpur park \nshivalik malviya ngr , NEW DELHI 110017 \nTelephone : 91-011-6673309 \n\nRegards, Sonzy.
187906
You are obviously very well spoken and this will stand to you if you do choose to go furthur with this...just keep your cool!!!!\n..It is an aweful thing when those supposedly enforcing the law become unlawful themselves!\nI believe you should speak up...if you feel you would be safe to do so. If there is a politicians office an external law office to the one you delt with then go for it. It is people like you that create change!\nThe very fact that you posted this information here is the first step in challenging a corrupt authority.\nbe careful...good luck!
395674
There is a lot of law on this, but it's all state- (or jurisdiction-)specific and you'd have to tell us where you are for any answer to be reliable.\n\nAs a general rule, once told of the problem the owner of the livestock has to do something to prevent them becoming a nuisance. Do you have a fence? Are they damaging the fence?\n\nThe simplest solution may be to put up a cheap electric fence of your own. Disputes between neighbors can get out of hand, and the legal costs become disproportionate to the problem. I would suggest doing whatever you can do cheaply yourself before escalating the matter as a legal issue.
536547
This is a difficult case with no easy answers. \n\nThe lawyer who represented Ms Campbell in court sums up the other side's case: \n"This was not a decision about custody. It was a decision on whether Mr Rana had acted improperly by violating the court order made at the Court of Session in Scotland in June last year." \n\nFor arguments for both sides: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/highlands_and_islands/6192406.stm\n\ncc
174944
There seems to be too much confusion in this matter. There are too many notification in this regards. However after checking lot of reference looks like it is prohibited now - NOTIFICATION NO. 28 (RE-2001)/1997-2002, Dt. 10/09/2001.\n\nPermitted in limited fashion - http://dgftcom.nic.in/exim/2000/cir/cir98/cir1198.htm\n\nProhibited - http://dgftcom.nic.in/exim/2000/not/not01%5Cnot2801.htm\n\nPermitted - http://exim.indiamart.com/freedlist/prohibited-0505.html\nlatest:\n\n      (iii) The following entry may be corrected to read as follows:-\n\nCode No.Item DescriptionPolicyNature of Restriction\n0505Peacock Tail Feathers including handicrafts and articles made thereofProhibitedNot permitted to be exported.\n\nlater: Export of peacock tail feathers is prohibited under the Exim policy, and is also banned under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972,\n\nearlier RESTRICTIONS PERTAINING TO EXPORTS OF ARTICLES MADE \nFROM ANIMALS ETC.\n\nThe Government of India is concerned about the conservation of its endangered \nand rare fauna Keeping this in mind, export of all wild animals indigenous to the \ncountry and articles made from such listed animals like skins, pelts, furs, ivory, \nrhino horns, trophies, etc., have been totally banned. These include all forms of \nwild anima s including their parts and products, except peacock tail feathers and \nhandicrafts made from them and those made from articles and shavings of antler, \ncheetals and sambars. The export of exotic birds is also not allowed.
418117
You may get away killing one atmost a few of them, Then you will be behind bars for ever. Instead  try this. Join a political party try work your way up & becom a MLA & try make a genuine change for your city. \n\nOr get a group of volunteers together, team up with the oppsition party & fight for a change. Do Dharnas, Rallys & with opposition's strength you will be better heard. \n\nPlease keep your frustration & anger in check. I have felt my city is hopeless & would never improve but then what you suggest is no answer. I try & influence my friends to stick by traffic rules, keep thier vehicle green & avoid paying bribes. Do your bit, you can keep doing it forever. You try something rash & your whole future is at stake & you could have contributed much better had you chosen a different path. All the best!
362256
If the co had grounds for issue the order then it was right if not he could go to IG.\nNow if complaints come to the co(would they do if there are any)that came from housing /building coordinator or even the 3 strike rule has been in forced the co has all ground to put an order out like that and its not personal.What he is trying to do then is protect the soldier and his wife to sit on the street.If you had a 3 strike rule put out and you do not get rid of those dogs housing will evict u in a matter of days and then the co has to deal with that issue too.\nSo you see if you think that order was right get rid of the dogs.\nIf you think it was wrong go to IG.