There's the movie, "Loose Change" and many websites like 911truth.com
208159
ok i've watched loose change four times or so now, and spent way too much time reading on various websites, they make some convincing points...but then they ignore alot of stuff as well...like common sense.\n\ncould there be some conspiracy behind 911? yes there could be. is it these theories that are popularly being advanced currently on the web...no\n\nstart at the end and work your way forward: the point of 911 was to destroy some buildings.  there are easier ways for the government to pull this off than to.\nsecretly swap planes in the air for non-passenger drone places, fly two of them into buildings, which they already rigged with additional explosives, secretly land the planes, secretly kill the passengers, fake a plane crash at one location, get voice samples from passengers to load into a computer to produce fake phone calls to loved ones with, then swap one plane for a missle (never mind that some claim this was a smaller drone plane) fire it into the pentagon, get 100 or so people to claim they saw a plane(this is ignored by loose change which uses two of the four people that claimed to not have seen a plane) then run around real fast knocking over the light poles etc...loose change claims a plane couldn't knock over those lamp poles that way, but never tries to explain how they were knocked over, if we assume that not all 100+ witnesses were cia plants, then we have to wonder why no one went, "and there these guys ran around loosening all the bolts on those lamps and pushed them over and ran off! dam kids!"\n\nloose change and other sources also use alot of broadcasts from very early after the attacks took place during which there was alot of confusion about what happened, live news especially while something is happening doesn't always get things 100% correct and uses alot of speculation to fill in time while they figure things out.\n\nloud thuds of things like, say upper floors falling into lower ones, could no doubt sound very much like other explosions going off.\n\nthe list goes on and on, but this post is getting rather long.\n\nok so lets face it, thats one complicated plan to bring down some buildings.  you could just blow them up, blame who ever you wanted to, say you are investigating how security could have been breached to such an extent, and leave it at that.\n\nits just too complicated of a conspiracy, that would take way way too many people to keep their mouths shut.
211900
There's an excellent engine at the CIA website to sort this information -- and much more.
310868
None.\n\nDo a search on "911 Conspiracy" and you will get your answers.
208700
try going to pacifica radio or kpfk fm and look at their links and archives ,aclu .org website and the website for disinformation from the book disinformation you are being lied to
223254
I haven't seen it and don't really know if I have an interest in it.\n\nI think it is basically a telling of the "popular" version of what happened and I have seen Loose Change.\n\nWhen you start asking questions about "what is the most currenty information we have about the attack?", you really have to define who WE are. I think not everyone who really knows what happened is dead.\n\nIt's good to ask questions, even if it's dangerous. History takes a long time to let the truth slip.
165070
Just watch this video, you'll get the answers of all your questions ... It changed 360° my opinion of 9/11
604744
HERE IT IS  http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7439171952665148194
668884
no\nwww.loosechange911.com\nwww.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net
443593
The information might be available on www.jw-media.com
126369
This urban myth has been around for many years (at least 30) and has been looked into.  As of yet not such site has been found.  \n\nThis is from the same people who have given us the idea of black helicopters and coded highways and traffic TV cameras being used for surveillance.\n\nIf you really believe this provide solid, credible sites.
656637
Stuff about 9/11 sounds interesting and there are many things that has not been clarified by our government. We can doubt what they do and I do not believe everything the politicians says. The video clip does not have many solid evidence and the creator is not credible enough.
150933
Come on what do you think check out some web pages on what happened at the pentagon and then you tell me!!
149311
I watch it and I was shock to see many of the findings. Especially that they have way to mimic peoples voices and just lie and place the blame where it doesn't belong. This day I am sad to for both the victims of WTC and the citizens of both Iraq and Afghanistan and we all need to wake up our freedom is at stake here. Please be careful Andaria. People are gonna try to make all sorts of excuses but the fact remains where is the proof??
657003
9-11  Are you serious?  I watch it the conspiracy is the oldest wrong info around.  My father work in Homeland Security.  The facts are what we saw the stories people tell are just that.  We were attacked!!!!
519449
alright man, just go to www.st911.org. I believe there is a list on www.911truth.org. It will blow your mind.
640704
Some of what is presented in "loose change" can be disputed to the point of possibly being coincidental or hear say.\n\nBut there are also things that are pointed out in the film that cannot be disputed, as it would violate the laws of physics for them to have occurred in the way that our government has led us to believe.\n\nI have been doing research on both sides of this issue and there are several items that violate physics.\n\n1. No mater how structurally compromised the struck floors were, the towers could not have fallen at free fall speed. This can only occur when there is no support anywhere under the falling structure.\n\n2. You cannot take out multiple light poles on the way into the pentagon with out leaving massive amounts of debris in the path from the poles knocking chunks out of the plane much less the flaming fuel spill it would have produced. The Boeing fuel tests proved that a plane hitting even a single light pole would rip the wing off creating a huge fireball immediately. There was no debris or scorch marks anywhere other than the scorch marks at the building itself.\n\nThe laws of physics do not conveniently change for anyone no matter how much rhetoric that people spew. We will probably never know the truth about who was responsible, but we do know that the story our government has fed us doesn't hold water.
483837
Some websites in sources section....