or do you agree with the Fedration of American Scientists(FAS) who say it is opposing the global security measures
212105
No they shouldn't.\n\nIf they can't be fair to IRAN about nuclear technology, than that makes them hypocrites.
542589
I support stem cell research.\nI vehemently oppose Federal Funding (taxpayer) for stem cell research.  There is no more important right on this planet than private property rights (my money).  There will always be some worthy cause that politicians will use to spend "federal funds", and the slow erosion of private property rights for "worthy causes" will only make things worse.\n\n.
322414
Your right. You should probably take up arms against the US army to stop them.  I think after everything thats happended you are morally obligated to take a stand. Arent you?
523164
what do you mean by "oppose"? \n\nofficially the war is over with the Iraqi army.\n\nThe North Korean, Syrian , Cuban and Iranian certainly arent allies of the US.
42952
Well, it's not like evrey single guard is going to be an arab.  There will still have to be American citizens.  It's just that the company that will oversee those guards will be owned by the Saudi government.  Just the same, I'm against it, too.  I'd be just as much against it if I had known that the company was previously owned by a British company.  Yes, they are both our allies.  So what.  They're not US.  Not only should Americans be the guards, the company in charge should be American as well.
180926
Yes. They should continue it, despite US "Aggression"\n\nIt is not right for the US to dictate who can have nuclear technology in the world...especially when they are the only ones to have ever used nuclear weapons on people.
642737
Ok, so most of us agree that the pentagon's statement is bullsh**. I just wanted to make a comment to those who are pissed at the guy who posted this ques. Did you read the whole thing before you answered? He doesn't agree either, dumbasses. He even stated that those people are a disgrace to the civilized world. Stop being so f***ing immature!
656427
Most definitely ! Reminds me of an old FDR quote during WW2.\n\nIt is a shame some Americans don't understand or support that quote. However, I think most Americans would agree.
228554
*sigh*. This has been addressed several times in these forums.  \n\nThe conspiracy theorists really don't have a leg to stand on.  See the link below that debunks these guys.
591757
2000, when the Supreme Court decided that a fair and accurate recount must be stopped. Read the dissents in that case (see link below).\n\nAnd I think Mr.Danger's title is more accurate, though I prefer "Commander in Sheik". Captures the flavor better.\n\nYou've hit the real problem though. Hypocrisy. This administration would never tolerate another country doing what they claim is justified. \n\nRegardless of whether we like North Korea or Iran or not, if Germany or England or Brazil tried to tell the US that it could not engage in particular research or test weapons in international waters, the US would tell them to go bleep themselves. And then defend their rights with force.\n\nAnd every other country that has invaded another sovereign nation because they didn't like the way things were being handled has been denounced as tyrants. But it's alright for the US to do it?\n\nAnd the US denounces other countries (well, they used to last decade) for torturing people or violating civil rights. But the current administration can ignore not only its own Constitution but many international treaties (signed and ratified), because it feels like it?\n\nHypocrisy has always bothered me. And the current US administration is the best case for why in at least the last century.
222340
no i dont think so ,i think it is amessage to other countries , which means 2 be with us or against us
503079
Check  the link of the source. You see that there are some disagreement
70904
From the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, it sounds like they need alot of upgrading.  They don't have as many nukes targeted on the USA as i had thought, although one would be enough.
649005
No, they won't be outraged.  Somehow it will be the fault of "neo-cons" who are Gore bashing and don't have any proof that he is wrong.  It's easy to mislead people with fear.  Especially when you say things like "the polar ice caps are melting more rapidly than ever and will lose significant portions of land mass in the next ten years!"  Okay, what does that mean?  How much is it losing relative to its mass?  Where are your numbers?  Oh, I forgot, numbers don't SUPPORT their arguments.  Why must we suffer the ignorance of fools?
611012
That might be possible if it wasn't for the fact that many of these organizations are opposed by the USA. Many of these are out to bring the USA to bear for war crimes and crimes against humanity, which is in the interests of everybody.
627445
America COULD, if she wanted, become a fortress effectively defending herself on the four horizon points from any infiltration, or attack.\n\nBut globalism and unchecked alien invasion has rendered this hypothesis a waste of time. \n\nThe Congressional sale has been going on for decades, and it's near midnite, don't you know.
533729
As much as I'd like to say that I wouldn't, because I am opposed to those actions, I'm sure I would find myself being somewhat hypocritical and saying that we should take those actions.  It's very hard to say.  I just believe that taking away civil liberties is a slippery slope.  It's just hard to balance freedom and safety.  I know what I think now, but I'm human, and I can't say that my opinions wouldn't change with another big attack.