I know that the prohibition caused problems in the 1920's but i dont no what they were or how it caused problems.
211192
Well people still wanted to drink, so they had to do so illegally which meant sometime purchasing alcohol of dubious origins and purity - so people could get arrested for doing something illegal or could get sick.\n\nIt also help organized crime get a strong grip on the country as they controlled the alcohol and many politicians.\n\nPeople making alcohol at home sometimes had fires caused the distilling liquer in closets, basements etc.\n\nThe alcohol industry was shut down thus causing the loss of jobs.
14983
Several things including Indian Removal, The Nullification crisis and introducing the "spoils system"\n\nFor more information, view the link below.
479502
The Blue laws were created in terms of the Sabbath as a resting day. The laws did not just prhibit the sale of alcohol but rpohibited many different things form being done on Sundays. Many state s have relaxed the laws. \n\nBack when the laws were drawn, many shops were closed on Sundays anyway.\n\nI am not a Sunday drinker so I dont care if I cant buy alcohol on Sunday.\n\nSome states HAVE relaxed the laws, here in Texas we can Purchase after 12:00. It seems that it is up to the states and how they want to proceed.
161361
Many countrys used to use protectionist policys to tax imports of stuff which undercut there own important industries. Other countrys respondid with simmilar measures, eventualy ensuring very little was traded between the main Empires of the day.
165598
Guns.  Today, kids with guns would be a problem, but in colonial days they were just helping to hunt.\n\nWitch hunts.  Now we just have modern politics like McCarthyism, but I'm sure it's just not the same.\n\nSmallpox.  Back then it wasn't just for secret weapons labs, nor was it special to gifts of blankets given to the natives.\n\nQuakers.  They prohibited sex and eventually people lost interest in conversion.\n\nA king (human).  Good ole George would tell them all what to do so they didn't have to worry about making their own economic policy decisions.\n\nImagination.  Thanks to TV and video games, this is mostly not there any more.\n\nDances.  This happened more frequently and played a larger role in society.\n\nSlaves.  Apparently this was outlawed in the 1860's, but apparently some rich people never quite accepted that it was completely wrong.\n\nBooze.  The drinking age was much lower back when there were no cars to drive.
267973
not all of those that you mentioned,\nbut yes,there are problems,conflicts,...etc.
338633
The cynic in me says it's all about the money, while, well, the cynic in me also says that it's about the squeaky wheel getting the grease.  Like the person above, it has something to do with taxes, but part of it is also about shutting people up who complain about perceived "evils", and these have been and are enacted by people from all across the political spectrum, not just conservatives, though the types of freedoms abridged differ between conservatives and liberals.  That was a large part of the impetus behind Prohibition and its later descendants.  For what it's worth, I think it sucks, and just as importantly, it sucks resources and money from areas that could better use the money.
366218
Maybe you can get help at your local American Legion. They have people to help with these problems. And they'll be on your side.
346293
many Americans were mad about the ban of slavery and the duties levied upon them. The Mexicans also put down many restrictions upon their every day life, but in the end many Texans rebelled because they were greedy and wanted to be annexed by the U.S.
519001
You forgot to mention ignoring the aids crisis, starting a war on drugs that brought us many problems we have today, closing mental hospitals and driving up the number of homeless people.\n\nOh Reaganomics, ridiculous tax cuts that Bush Sr had to repeal.
53155
There were no African-Americans in the Major Leagues in 1920, so some could argue that the league was watered down with out the inclusion of some of those fine athletes.  Also, there were far less teams in Major League Baseball in 1920 than there are today, this could, in fact, be an arguement that it was more difficult to become a Major Leaguer in 1920 than today.  It is also important to bring up the salaries that the players receive for playing Major League Baseball.  For better or for worse, salaries in today's game are vastly larger than they ever were in 1920.  In 1920, many players had to have other jobs during the off season in order to make a living.  The off season training of today's athletes is also leaps and bounds ahead of where it was in 1920.  In 1920, the players simply played the game and didn't lift weight or watch what they ate.  Look at Babe Ruth for an example of this, he routinely crammed down hot dogs in between doubleheaders and was a notorious drinker.  Babe Ruth also probably never touched a weight in his life.  Could you imagine how he would have been if he had been on the sort of off season training regimine that today's athletes are on???  But that's another topic altogether.  Another thing to look at would be the pitchers statistics.  In 1920, pitchers were EXPECTED to finsh games that they started.  In today's games starting pitchers are credited with a "quality start" if they complete 6 innings.  The role of the bullpen and closers has also grown greatly since 1920 as a result of this.  An example of this would be how Bruce Sutter is the first solely relief pitcher to be elected into the Baseball Hall of Fame.  I hope that you got a few ideas from this, good luck with your paper. I would think you could whip it out no problem on this topic!
671303
As far as I am aware gun clubs were outlawed following the Dunblain incident.
364272
Ha ha u stink, my teacher was a softy, we just finished reading of mice and men and he never gave us h.w.\nThe farm depression of the 1920s:\nGreat Depression in the United States, worst and longest economic collapse in the history of the modern industrial world, lasting from the end of 1929 until the early 1940s. Beginning in the United States, the depression spread to most of the world’s industrial countries, which in the 20th century had become economically dependent on one another. The Great Depression saw rapid declines in the production and sale of goods and a sudden, severe rise in unemployment. Businesses and banks closed their doors, people lost their jobs, homes, and savings, and many depended on charity to survive. In 1933, at the worst point in the depression, more than 15 million Americans—one-quarter of the nation’s workforce—were unemployed.\n\nThe depression was caused by a number of serious weaknesses in the economy. Although the 1920s appeared on the surface to be a prosperous time, income was unevenly distributed. The wealthy made large profits, but more and more Americans spent more than they earned, and farmers faced low prices and heavy debt. The lingering effects of World War I (1914-1918) caused economic problems in many countries, as Europe struggled to pay war debts and reparations. These problems contributed to the crisis that began the Great Depression: the disastrous U.S. stock market crash of 1929 (see Black Monday), which ruined thousands of investors and destroyed confidence in the economy. Continuing throughout the 1930s, the depression ended in the United States only when massive spending for World War II began.\n\nThe depression produced lasting effects on the United States that are still apparent more than half a century after it ended. It led to the election of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who created the programs known as the New Deal to overcome the effects of the Great Depression. These programs expanded government intervention into new areas of social and economic concerns and created social-assistance measures on the national level. The Great Depression fundamentally changed the relationship between the government and the people, who came to expect and accept a larger federal role in their lives and the economy.\n\nThe programs of the New Deal also brought together a new, liberal political alliance in the United States. Roosevelt’s policies won the support of labor unions, blacks, people who received government relief, ethnic and religious minorities, intellectuals, and some farmers, forming a coalition that would be the backbone of the Democratic Party for decades to come.\nSorry- this is the best I can find for education during the 1930s:\nEconomics dominated politics in the 1930's.  The decade began with shanty towns called Hoovervilles, \nnamed after a president who felt that relief should be left to the private sector, and ended with an alphabet soup of federal programs funded by the national government and an assortment of commissions set up to regulate Wall Street, the banking industry, and other business enterprises. The Social Security Act of 1935 set up a program to ensure an income for the elderly. The Wagner Act of 1935 gave workers the legal right to unionize.  John L. Lewis founded the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) and conditions for blue-collar workers improved. Joseph P. Kennedy, a Wall Street insider, was appointed Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commissions.
609804
the only thing i can think of is the Jim Crow laws\n\nthese were a collection of laws that stopped black people  from doing a lot of things - although it referred more towards segregation and stuff like that.\n\nBut it could easily have been the vehicle barring blacks from voting because  it barred them from doing a lot of other things. The Jim Crow laws were deemed unconstitutional only in 1964.
358279
It was illegal to posess or make alcohol within the US, but they couldn't enforce a US law in another country.  That's like saying US police hang out in Amsterdam and arrest americans getting high.
55858
My information is regarding the 21st amendment of the US Constitution, which is what I assumed you were asking about.  There is also a 21st amendment to the Ireland Constitution, and some bars with the name 21st Amendment...\n\nFrom Wikipedia:\nThe Twenty-first was passed by the United States Congress on February 20, 1933 and was fully ratified by December 5, 1933. This Amendment is thus far the only case, besides the initial ratification of the original Constitution, in which state conventions, specially selected for the purpose—not state legislatures—ratified the amendment.\nThis has been interpreted to give states essentially absolute control over grain alcohol, and many U.S. states remained "dry" (state prohibition of alcohol) long after its ratification. (Mississippi was the last, remaining dry until 1966.) Many states now delegate the authority over alcohol granted to them by this Amendment to their municipalities and/or counties, which has led to many lawsuits over First Amendment rights when local governments have tried to revoke liquor licenses or nude dancing and other similar establishments.\nCourt rulings involving this amendment have been rare.\n\nIn May 2005, the Supreme Court decided in Granholm v. Heald (2005), by a 5–4 majority, that the 21st Amendment does not overrule the Dormant Commerce Clause with respect to alcohol sales, and states must treat in-state and out-of-state wineries equally.
173638
Because in the 1920's, paper was cheaper to make from Hemp, which also grows faster than trees. This threatened the Hearst Empire, which owned a lot of tree covered acres that were being harvested to make paper. They petitioned the Gov't about the medicinal qualities of marijuana and convinced them it is bad & should be illegal.