in the conquest of the Trench part of the disbelievers made agreement with the messenger Mohammed to take third of Madinah's fruits to leave.He told their commander that he agrees but he had to ask his comanions. he woundered and asked isn't u their leader. he said yes but they are the Madinah's owner while he know that if he ordered he will be obeyed but he appreciate freedom and human rights. bye the way they refused saying that when they were like the enemy disbelievers no one could take their fruit and tarade without cost , now when they are in the right side no one should do and they will never submit to the wrongful side. so the messenger Mohammed do what they ask for and canceld the agreement . isn't this equality and freedom.
217786
One must remember, that in Islam, unless you are a true believer, you are not consider worthily of any truth.  Therefore you may be lied to, killed and held to a different set of laws.  The freedom of speech that seems to be going around about Islam is only that in which the Mullahs allow you to speak.  There is none to speak of and there is only death to those that commit any type of unkind talk about Mohammad.
44256
the reaosn why the havent attacking AL_Quadua becuse they cant go on too the deep mountion with out getting bomd or; short ny a sinper in the hill. thses so call people in irqa are not people they are evil ' they have no sole they dont belvie in god ; the hate are way of life ; becuse they have no life in irqa. they have no rigth; they jsut know how to hurt people' to me that a sin too kill for kn resaon; them gain that thier way of life they need to keep thier self in thier own cou=nt  we dont need then in usa ;  idont that for sure; god know him slf. so who read this take any u wamt i dont care this is my home land i live in usa i was bron in USA::::} god give me that right. and dad and his brothers fright for my freedom,  that u.
131243
It's hard to say. Many times when you take things like that out of context, they can lose a lot of their meaning. However, it seems to me that he was saying that he would send prophets to us to help show us the way.
485362
Not sure if its mentioned in the text but don't muslims think there was a split in heaven when Adam was created?  Something about Allah wanting all beings to worship Adam and Satan refused and led a revolt.  Some angels sided with Satan and some with Allah.  Those who could not decide were sent here as humans to make their decision.  Something like that, I'm probably butchering their theology.
498682
Of couirse, you're assuming that God gave these orders, and any of it really happened. However, at that time, that is what happened when one counrty lost a war. all men were killed, and all women were assimilated into the winning culture.
584721
Well, God has a plan. They asked to be put into the herd of swine. Jesus allowed it. See the point? The demons couldn't even make a move without His very approval. The question misses the overall view. They could do nothing apart from His power. And they knew it. Jesus was demonstrating His power over the very forces of Hell. They will "get theirs" in due time, so to speak.
608095
I believe it was Sunni's who made the offer.  And this is another political move by the Sunni's. After they turned in Zarqarwi, they gained political seats, most importantly, Minister of Defense.  I haven't seen Pres. Bush's comments on the proposal.  This is the make or break time for the Iraqi government.  I hope something positive comes from this.  On the one hand, if Bush negotiates, he is negotiating with the terrorist and people will say they won.  If he doesn't, then he isn't really trying to get the troops out.  No matter what everyone is in an awkward position.  Hopefully, the end result no matter what is stability in the Iraqi government.  So I hope he talks to the Sunni's, even if they are pointing terrorism at us.  However, this doesn't solve the problem of terrorist from other countries.  Perhaps this will make the Sunni's obligated in helping to combat foreign terrorists.
277160
You jackass. the verse (8:68) refers to distribution of spoils of war. Now, anymore FAKE KORANIC VERSES I NEED TO READ?\n\nWho's the one embarrased now?\n\nEDIT:I want to make it clear. This verse is not taken out of the context because IT WAS NEVER IN THE CONTEXT!! It's fictitious.
44729
You are RIGHT!! They cannot justify it. Jesus would have never lifted a finger to harm another being!! Do some research into religions, and you will find ONLY ONE who does NOT send it's members to war, even choosing improsonment over war.
326257
i believe what "wants.." said. \n\nif they dare to kill Jesus, you think they can't mess with his book? \n\ni think they change the words of God to sell it with little bit of money to the people. i believe this is what happend. and ofcurse they change the words from its place so it can fit what they desire. \n\nit's sad all those people following a Bible that has been changed by few liars. !\n\ni wish all of them see the truth like how God showed me the truth. love you Islam.
499179
oianz saying "i  have yet to meet a militant Muslim".   keeping your head in the sand (no pun intended) doesnt make it go away.  there are groups of muslims who want every non muslim dead.  they ingrain it in their heads from day one.  the evidence is there I just dont understand why you refuse to believe it.  Do any research of the history of the middle east.  Call me racist do whatever but when somebody says they are going to kill you you should take it seriously and take care of the problem before they get their wish.
663347
You make a very good point. Unfortunately it isn't that simple because the feud goes back hundreds of years to the start of Islam and the Islamic and Christian Crusades. Both sides want to be victorious, both sides want to be right. Until you can get leaders in here like Saladin and King Richard who put their differences aside for the good of each of their nations, there will always be fueding.
147417
Good question.  One could make the argument that the followers are more committed to their religion than the leaders.  The followers are the ones willing to sacrifice their lives for their cause.  \n\nThe fallacy is that if there were no leaders, then the followers would not have anyone to subjugate&#92;manipulate which would defeat the purpose of recruiting for a global jihad.  (no warriors=no war) That brings up another question though--Why don't the followers question the motives of the Extremist leaders?
218639
Didn't Palestine make it's choice?  They chose a leadership that refuses to give up it's stated goal of "driving Israel into the sea".  You want them to stand still, continue to be attacked, while Palestine and the rest of Islam holds up a paper governement whose onlyt goal is to say, "Don't attack me, I didn't attack you!  It was individuals!  And you can't attack within my country without me saying so!"\n\nWho are we kidding?  The U.S. offered help because Islam wants to dominate the world, always has.  Israel has kept to their borders (pretty much, and when they didn't, like the Suez canal, we jumped on them to move out!).  Israel has no stated goal to destroy any other nation.  Israel has been repeatedly attacked after every cease fire by Palestine which cannot control it's own people.  If Palestine won't control it's own people, Israel cannot do less than retaliate against a government that through it's own inept and criminally negligent behavior allows attacks on neighboring regions.
650269
No where in the Bible did Jesus command his disciples to kill in the name of Jesus Christ. \nYou are right though, the Quran encourages it's followers to fight nonbelievers...........\n\nFight those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the last day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and his messenger(Muhammad) (4) And those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (ie. Islam) among the people of the scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah [tax] with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.\n-Surah 9:29\n\nWhen Muslims use the sword, they are practicing what the Quran teaches. \nThe evils done by Christians were by name only. They disobeyed the word of Christ. Because of this, you will see no difference between Muslims who kill, and the Christians who kill. The difference is in whether or not they are following the example of their leader.\n\nThe fact is that every person who participated in the Crusades was going against the teachings of Christ. However, when Muslims overthrow a Government by force, they are following both the teachings and example of Muhammad.\n\n\nTo Taimur, let me ask you, what would happen to you if you lived in a Muslim country and tryed to convert to Christianity?
30235
simply:\n\nthe Christian did the Crusades, trying to free the Promised Land from the Moslems, so they will be proud of their 'accomplishments.'\n\nthe muslims were the ones attacked by the Crusaders, so they will believe the Crusades to have been imperialism and an invasion.\n\nthe Jews along the way to the promised land were massacred by the Crusaders, who said, 'why go all the way to the Promised Land to kill the non-Christians, when we have non-Christians right here!' Therefore the Jews will not see the Crusaders as moral or ethical people, but rather as blood-hungry butchers.
358978
They keep things from him, so he can live in his happy little world, where he continues to think God talks directly to him.  God must have forgotten to tell him about this.  I find it amazing that he is "upset" about this issue, but not about our soldiers being put in harms way every minute because of his greed.