I can't tell the date as that is always on the heads side.\nIt has the same tail as some Eisehower and Kennedy half \ndollars.
202872
Hang on to it. Meanwhile, get it appraised by a coin dealer.
411386
MCRL looks stronger than the other stock.  As opposed to sideways, this one's in a slow uptrending channel, albeit near the top end.\n\nIf we get above 11.50, then that could be favorable.  Else, if it just bounces down off of the moving average, then the stock can drop a bit, maybe to 10.  So just keep your eyes peeled and be ready to sell and lock it in.\n\nGood luck!
631455
No it was a rumor that was fueled because some coins contained the images of a older Queen at the same time as a younger during the same year. \n\nThis error does not exist and no one ever sold one in the market.
664467
There's no one as such. And if there exists one, it won't share the same position after the next 14 days as after each 14 days, updates by the companies are released.\n\nRegards\n(Siddharth Razdan)
647083
Scroll down to Sept 12, 2002 and several later quotes. \nhttp://www.forbes.com/markets/newswire/2003/09/02/rtr1070778.html
417481
The market is open from 930A-400P ET.  There is also after hours trading as well that many stocks participate in.\n\nAs far as the holiday schedule, you can go to any of the websites to find that out (amex.com, nyse.com, and so on). \n\nHere's a listing of the holidays for 2006.\n\nNew Year's Day Jan 2 (2006) \nMartin Luther King, Jr. Day January 16 \nPresidents' Day February 20 \nGood Friday April 14 \nMemorial Day May 29 \nIndependence Day July 4 \nLabor Day September 4 \nThanksgiving Day November 23 \nChristmas Day (observed) December 25 \n\nPossible Early Closures: \nDay After Thanksgiving November 24 (1:00) \n\nHope that helps!
654071
There was a story about her horoscope not matching with Abishek's...after that, they have gone under wraps to avoid public glare...I guess it is waiting time...hope to hear some good news by end of the year !!
468836
hmm. i predicted this. look. lets just hope they hold\nhttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061104084414AAE8bqv&r=w
174916
This is much harder to do than it may seem.  The chief problem may be that you are keying on the earnings reporting date, not the quarter ending date.  \n\nThus, if a company reports great results for the quarter 1/06-3/06, but they report their earnings on 4/15/06, you want to see what happened to the stock beginning 4/15 going forward (and you may or may not be interested in the activity on 4/15 itself depending on whether they reported before the market opened, or after it closed).  To do this analysis precisely and automatically with some sort of screening software may not be possible because the earnings reporting dates vary.\n\nBest way I can think of to do this is go to \n\nwww.earnings.com\n\nNot all companies info will be given here, but for a whole lot of companies you can get the history of conference calls for a company, what they reported as earnings, and how this reported number compares to their guidance if they gave any.  Based on the time of day for the conference call you can also make a good guess as to whether the company reported earnings before the market opened or after the market closed.  From there you have to just look for companies that consistently beat quidance and had increasing earnings and check them out.\n\nAlso, though you are not asking for my advice, let me throw it in anyhow (you can ignore it if you want).  It sounds like you are trying to get a system for buying certain companies before earnings hoping for either a pop in price after earnings or a slow progression upwards until the next earnings date.  I think you may be onto something, but I doubt you will find an easy little system to follow.  Each company behaves differently (some always beat earnings, some usually hit earnings, some are erratic) but the companies behavior is well known by the people who track the stock and probably built into the price before earnings.  Thus, you are trying to estimate what actual earnings will be compared not to what past earings have been, nor compared to the companies own guidance but rather compared to the markets consensus of what the earnings should be and who knows what that number is.  Also, more important than the companies earnings might be their forward guidance and this may drive the price alot more than the actual earnings.\n\nTo give an example for that last sentence, supposed a company consistently beats earnings by varying amounts, and is growing at 20-30% per year.  They guide their earnings 10% above last years number, but since they always beat the market may decide they are just being cautious and based on how their industry has been chugging along the market prices the stock as if earnings will come in 30% above last year.  Earnings come in and are 20% above last year.  On the day they report earnings, the company shows 20% growth, and is still 10% above quidance but will nonetheless probably have a really bad day because the actual earnings are 10% below what the market was expecting.\n\nTo give another example suppose a company is growing 20%, is expected to earn 20% more than last year, hits the number perfectly, but then guides lower for next quarter.  Watch out below, the earnings in this case is meaningless.\n\nI guess what I'm saying is there are alot of details to consider and if you get it right 2/3rd of the time you may end up a millionaire in spite of having some really bad days.  Anyhow, www.earnings.com may be the place to look for this data, and best luck with your analysis.
47395
thestreet.com has an excellent article on Cramers advice. The contributor was showing how people get in trouble just blindly following his advice..like i did with bookham not taking the time to realize their quarterlyy report came out the next day. bummer...
666911
What you are hoping to capture by buying a calendar spread is the decay of the first expiring option relative to the decay of the second. Read "Options as a Strategic Investment".\n\nA short term option loses its time value faster than a longer term option. So, if the decay on the longer is a penny a day...and the decay on the shorter option is 1/8 a day...you are capturing 11 1/2cents per day and protecting yourself in case of a big market move. Is it a given that you'll make money??? Absolutely not. Every time you think that, think to yourself "there are a million other people out there that have thot about this for at least 25 years...chances are I am not thinking anything original" !
433011
The price the stock is at the end of the day.\nExample\nOpening price (begining of the day) for BAC on 11/2/2006 was 53.36\nClosing price (end of the day) for BAC on 11/2/2006 was 53.55\nA 19 cent increase, or .35%
557708
I think it's on an angle.  Other jerseys on the team seem on angle.  I noticed this during Italy's game.
43519
> Is there a good website/source that predicts the stock market outlook in 2006 (e.g., 3% or 7%)? \n\nThere are some timing services with good track records, but they don't give out their predictions for free.  The good ones don't make predictions a year out--too many things can happen.\n\n> Is the US currency likely to depreciate in 2006?\n\nI can't put a time on it, but eventually the holders of dollars will tire of US financial mismanagement and trade them for yen, euros, or other currencies.  The editor of Barron's had a scary opinion piece on that topic last week.  \n\n> Which sector will perform better than others (e.g., healthcare, consumer staples, financial, energy)?\n\nI've put my money on alternative energy and organic/health foods.  Alternative energy will take a dive if oil goes to $30 a barrel, but steady oil prices will support them for a while.  I admit they're frothy now so this may not be the time to buy.  Whole Foods Market is in a slump but I'm looking for a bottom to buy.  Wild Oats is coming back from the dead.  Hain and United Natural Foods are doing well.  I think this sector will outperform in almost any economic scenario, while alternative energy needs scarcity to thrive.  The potential reward in alternative energy is higher than food, however.  For the very long term, worldwide water shortage is going to mean incredible profits for a few companies.  Start researching now, before the financial press latches onto this story.\n\n> Or, are large-cap stocks expected to outperform small-caps? \n\nLarge-cap vs. small-cap outperformance is a very slow cycle.  I expect small-caps to keep the lead for some time. Right now I'm holding IWM (Russell 2000 fund) and trading the Diamonds (Dow Jones Industrials fund)--buy on pullbacks and sell rises for a small profit.
5458
The number of the year, 1961, reads the same both right-side up and upside down.\nThe next time this will occur is in the year 6009, or 4048 years after 1961.
39538
Sounds cool.  Pun intended.  I placed this on my watch list because I'd like to know the source for this info when it comes.  Good luck.
503319
Occasionally the charts are correct.  Occasionally they are not. When they are not it is call a whip saw.  I tend to use charts but I do not rely on them completely.  I have been whip sawed more than once.  If the stock if fundamentally sound and the chart appears good, then I am apt to invest in it.  I have frequently regretted it.