Abortion: Texas vs. California
208250
call the Planned Parenthood offices. I am sure they can give you all the info you need
420434
No one has the right to make a "choice" that kills another innocent human being.  It's amazing how completely ignorant most pro-aborts seem to be when it comes to prenatal development and pain perception:  \n\nhttp://www.advocatesfortheinnocent.com/fetalpain.html\nhttp://www.justthefacts.org/clar.asp\nhttp://www.abort73.com/HTML/I-A-2-prenatal.html\nhttp://www.studentsforlife.uct.ac.za/foetal%20dev%20photos.html\nhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/3847319.stm\nhttp://www.lifeissues.org/ultrasound/11weeks.htm\nhttp://www.cbrinfo.org/Resources/pictures.html\nhttp://www.abort73.com/HTML/I-A-4-video.html\n\nThe average age of an aborted baby in America is 10 weeks.  By that point, the child is fully formed and can even suck her thumb.  If her palm is pricked, she will pull her hand away and open her mouth.  In an ultrasound video of an abortion at 11 weeks, the child can be seen struggling violently to escape the suction instrument, while her heartrate doubles and she opens her mouth wide.  Unfeeling, unaware, and unformed?  Hardly!  However--even if the child was unaware and not fully developed, it would still be wrong to kill her.  Shooting a premature infant in her sleep is no less murderous than strangling a full-grown adult while he is awake.\n\nSince when does being "unwanted" make people less worthy to live than everyone else?  Should we kill homeless people and elderly people who are "unwanted," too?  Let's be honest, too--there is no such thing as an "unwanted" baby in the U.S. There are two million couples waiting to adopt right now, including couples who want to adopt children with health problems such as HIV, Down Syndrome, and spina bifida.  \n\nNewborn babies cannot survive without their mothers, either.  Left alone, they will die.  They are completely dependent.  Does that mean it's okay to kill them, too?\n\nWhere is the compassion?  Where is the logic?  Pro-aborts are completely twisted, yes.
127838
THere are a lot more important issues than the abortion issue.  That was the platform that got the republican supporters in an uproar to the extent that they couldn't see the real damage being done to this country.  It's just a smoke screen, no matter who uses it and which side their on in the issue.  Abortion isn't going to matter is GWB starts WWIII, we'll all be dead.
177168
Texas definitely!  Everything is bigger in Texas:)
501398
Roe vs. Wade.\n\nBrown vs. Board of Education.
50483
I think should be a CHOICE.  I am not for using abortion as birth control, but if there are other factors involved I think it should be up to the woman.
32000
no.  i think they are going to hear a case involving partial-birth abortions.  while the outcome would likely have consequences for the practitioners of abortion, it could not overturn roe vs. wade.
491237
Seems to me that Christians should actively campaigning AGAINST the immorality that is the slaughter of the unborn. Privacy has nothing to do with this, and it bothers me that so many so-called "Christians" can support something that is both illegal and immoral (Contrary to popular belief, Abortion is not now nor has it ever been legal as it did not pass through either the people or the legislature), and to me, apathy makes one as guilty as campaigning FOR it.
552707
Which side are you taking?\n\nOh, and do your own research.  There's so much information out there about abortion, and if this is for a school project, I don't think your teacher would approve of you just asking the Yahoo! answers community.  Do some work.
672432
California - hands down. Check with NCAA - I bleieve they keep numbers on this. I think contirbuting to the pros that California is No. 1 and Texas and/or Florida are No. 2/3
372284
The UK is once again debating over its abortion laws. It is allowed in this country currently up 24 weeks providing 2 doctors give their consent that to not abort would be of detrrement to the womans physical or mental health, that it would harm the child or their family. \nseems about right to me.
218270
I think you are stuck.  Your rights as a mother are no stronger than his rights as a father.  You both have rights as parents, and that means that neither of you can pick up the child and move out of state without the permission of the other.  Would you like it if he decided to move to California with your son but not you?
524318
Although I am a Christian and truly believe that at the moment of conception a human being is created, I really struggle with this issue. So, after years of fierce internal struggles, here's what I believe.\n\nAbortion, no matter what the reason, ends a life. But I do not feel that you can legislate whether or not abortion should be legal. The decision to abort or not to abort is a moral issue, a decision that rests on the shoulders of the woman carrying the child. The consequences--if the woman chooses to abort--are between the woman and God. \n\nWhat needs to happen in America and around the world for that matter, is a massive effort to educate people with viable information that will prevent unwanted pregnancies. Prevention is our only hope.
316770
i never thought about it that way.thank you Spock.people all the time say that Christians are imposing their religion on abortion.you know,your right,if an atheist came forward on t.v and said that, the pro-choice would never say their imposing their views on the abortion issue.\n              God Bless
95743
Pro-abortionists will say that the unborn baby is a product of conception.  This allows them to not have to deal with the baby issue.  They want to say that pro-lifers are anti-choice....that they are against a woman having the right to choose what happens to their body.  I think the pro-murder or anti-life (I will call them that as they like to use the anti-choice moniker) advocates don't understand that pro-lifers are trying to speak up for the choice of one who cannot be heard...the baby!  The argument that I like to use, from a Biblical sense is that God says He knew us before we were born and that He knit us together in our mother's womb.  This indicates that He began life before our actual birth.  The argument that the baby is just a product of conception...it is true.  A baby is a product of conception, the only one...you conceive a baby!  It is not the baby's fault that you made a mistake, that you were irresponsible or that some sick bas...d went and did something to a woman that he should be strung up by his ba..s for!  That baby is innocent!  The woman who aborts a baby is also, often, wracked with guilt in their later years over what they did.  Why inflict an additional pain on some poor girl/woman who has been raped, etc.?  It is illegal to break an eagle's egg because it is living and the bald eagle is endangered, but it is legal to kill a human infant in the same state...what kind of sick logic is that?
56397
There are a lot of us afraid of that. It's just a matter of time until they challenge Roe vs.Wade in the supreme court, and with the new justices appointed by Bush, it could easily be overturned. That would be a travesty. We have too many throw away children in our society now, and I was alive before Roe vs. Wade. I've seen what horrors illegal abortions can produce, and there will be illegal ones if it's overturned. \n\nThese people who are so pro abortion have no idea how many children will suffer if it's overturned. Is it better to have a child born then abused, neglected or abandoned than for a woman to have an abortion? And what right does anyone have to make that judgment for another woman. Moreso, what right does our government have to make that decision for a woman. It's her body, and it should be her decision. She's the one who knows her circumstances. \n\nYes, I agree that she should have thought about that before she got pregnant, but there are reasons that women get pregnant other than promiscuity, and once again, it's not our place to judge another.
398749
Abortion stinks!!!!!!!!!!!