I'm running PeerGuardian and it seems that my computer is trying to make a lot of outbound traffic to 130.91.171.45:55583 from port 64427. Apparently port 55583 is an RPC port. My computer tries to make the connection several times a minute. I've run virus scans (NOD32), Spyware scans (Ad-Aware), and gone through my running processes to no avail.\n\nNow I'm just looking for a program that can possibly link the outgoing traffic to something specific running on my computer, but I'm not sure how to google it. If anyone has any insight as to a program I can use, or if they maybe know what this is, please let me know.
201272
Try runnig ethereal.  It will show you the actual traffic and you can look at stuff by port.  There mays be clues in the content.
236189
Well, you could use Ethereal http://www.ethereal.com/ to monitor all traffic to and from your pc. The standard port for outbound email is port 25, so keep a close eye on traffic leaving your computer from that port especially. It wont get rid of spyware or viruses, of course, but it will tell you if something is sending email without your knowledge.
297156
what you want to do is to use NAT.  what this does is make all traffic from your lan look like it's coming from the same IP, each connection using a different port. example: 1 server connected to the net w/ 1 pc in the lan:\n\npc1 wants www.3atm3.com's webpage and sends a request from 1.1.1.1 to the NAT box 1.1.1.2, which sends the info to the net saying "1.1.1.2:1234 looking for www.3atm3.com", when the page comes back it will be for port 1234, and the NAT box forwards the info to 1.1.1.1\n\nI'm not giving you a set-by-step to set up a NAT, but the idea is that:\n1) lan pc's use the NAT server as their gateway...done\n2) NAT box is configured to route traffic and knows it is doing NAT for the LAN\n\n...use a linux box for the NAT server- it's easier
382302
Do some testing.  Try http://www.dslreports.com with and without your P2P service activated.  Repeat the test with your computer connected directly to the high speed service.(without the router)\n\nProve that this is the router!\n\nGood luck and Happy Computing
87226
Port scans happen all the time.  You don't usually report them to anybody.
43758
egads...#1-wrong, #2-wrong.\n\n\n#1 "...The computers behind your router use non-routable IP address, for example, 192.168.0.9..."\n\nthe local IP's are certainly routable, they are just not exposed to the Public internet as that IP.\n\n#2 "...ISPs usually block the ports that FTP and web servers use. You may need to use a port other that 21..."\n\nSOME ISP's may block that port, far more do not, than do in my experience. \n\nto answer the question, the software you installed seems to be aquiring another IP address from the DHCP server in your router, let it.  Setup 'port forwarding' in your router to forward traffic on port 21 to go to THAT IP address.\nNOTE: you will likely not be able to access FTP resources from the PC the 'server' is installed on, unless you disable the 'port fowarding'....
294740
I went here:  http://ehkconsulting.co.uk  and it pulled up the site.  Ensure that the LAN you're behind doesn't have web filtering such as proxy servers used.
400147
you could try radmin, logmein, gotomypc, \n\nif you are able to access the net properly than these software will work fine with it.\n\nlet me know if you have any further question.
619705
All web traffic is sent to the proxy server which then sends it to the propoer destination on the web.  Your traffic is monitored and could be read.  It is doubtful that anyone actually takes the time to read it.  More likely the administrator configured certain sites and traffic to block and then let it run.  Although you can flag certain traffic so the server notifies the administrator when it is found.  Basically be careful what you do!
618751
the server that u are on is belonging to an american oil company,dont try to hack it because u will get in troubles\n\nnow if u insist,try portforwarding maybe u will be able to see the pages that u want
416169
Run Nmap from a computer outside of your home network to test all 65535 ports. Doing it one by one is such a hassle.\nhttp://insecure.org/nmap/
592678
I did a quick search on Trojan Hunter's website and a quick check in there forums came up with this. \nhttp://forum.misec.net/board/FAQ/1139255619\n\nHere is another link to port alerts in TH.\nhttp://uk.misec.net/trojanhunter/help/?page=PortAlerts
19916
check this link it most answers ur question\nhttp://macarlo.com/firewallreport.htm\n\nbut u can  also read here....\n\nThe best solution is a combination of a Hardware and Software Firewall.  The Hardware box protects your perimeter before things get into your network or to your box and takes some of the load off of the software firewall.  The Software firewall then provides a further layer of protection for your computer.  With different vendors too, you get a more balanced level of protection.\n\nFor example, a nice Watchguard Firebox X Edge protects my perimeter.  It runs about $350.  It provides NAT and DHCP and will block all ports incoming unless I specifically open them up, like RDP or PCAnywhere.\n\nOn my computer then, I have Norton Internet Security.  It provides a further layer of protection.  Since the Hardware Firewall takes care of the majority of hack attacks from the Internet, my software firewall doesn't have to work as hard and my PC can use more of it's processing power for other things.  The Software firewall also protects the PC from any threat that might start from inside my network and also from malicious code that might piggyback on legitimate web requests.  The Hardware firewall will do some of that, but the software one picks up where the hardware leaves off.  The software firewall by default also blocks all outgoing requests unless I permit it.\n\nI like the Norton Internet Security, but have used Zone Alarm in the past and it has been very good.  At work, I use Windows XP XP2 firewall to further protect my internal clients.\n\nOf course on top of those things, I run Norton AntiVirus, SpySweeper 3.5, SpyBot 1.3 and use Ad Aware to augment the others.  POPupCop helps protect my PC from PopUP disaster and I use Windows Washer 5.5 to keep the Internet clutter at bay after each web session.
447588
do a tinternet search on\nbt home hub port forwarding ;)
80457
This is hard to troubleshoot with the info you gave.  Maybe you could add what port/s you are forwarding?  What service you are attempting to connect to on the internal pc?  Try these pragmatic steps to figure out where the problem is.  Have a friend on the phone and ready to make the connection and disconnect the router from the dsl/cable modem.  Connect it straight to the pc and wait a few seconds for it to obtain an IP address and have your friend try it.  If you are still unable to make the connection then it is not the fault of the router.  I don't think the router is to blame actually but the internet provider.  Depending on what port you are attempting to connect to, the provider might be blocking access to it in an attempt to protect you.  You can try having port fowarding setup to answer on a different port on the router and foward it to the desired one on the pc ... ie port 10105 on the router fowarded to port 139 on the internal pc.  An alternative might be to setup a VPN connection to your network.  Many routers will handle this for you.\n\n/EDIT 3-24-06 10:12 PM/  I recieved your e-mail and attempted to send back to you but you have not yet confirmed your e-mail address.  From the look of things you are attempting to setup terminal services.  I am leaning even harder towards the isp blocking those ports.  VPN might not be a good choice because if I am not mistaken terminal services uses UDP packets.  UDP is possible over a VPN but all advantage is lost because of the TCP packet type used in a VPN (read reliable versus fast)
384736
Dangerous programs only get on your computer when you run something, so be careful what you download and run.\n\nThe purpose of Browser Hijackers is usually for the attacker to make money off ads.\n\n"68.2.16.30.53" is not an IP, and makes no sense...but 68.0-15.X.X are IPs owned by Cox Communications Inc. (Looks like an internet prover based in Atlanta).\nhttp://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=!%20NET-68-0-0-0-1\n\nI should point out, you would NEVER see the IP of an attacker from a Browser Hijack. He doesn't connect to you, nor do you connect back to him. It just controls your browser.
598608
A very rough way of doing it in CMD would be to "telnet" to each machine, and each P2P listening port. If the port answers, then there might be a P2P software running on the system. Depending on the size of your network, this can be extremely cumbersome.\n\nI suggest instead to install "Ethereal" on a machine, or segment which is at your default gateway.\n\nThis is a free "sniffer" software tool, which allows viewing all data packets on the monitored segment.\n\nInstallation should take approximately 5 minutes on a laptop. Leave it running for 24 hours at the right segment, and next day you will be able to get a traffic report, and even drill down to the specific traffic, and data content.\n\n\nAlthough LANGuard Network Security is available for a free demonstration, it is not a free software.