i want only a simple comparasion of the classical theores ,scienctific theories,behavioural theories,contingency theories
209742
Get off line and go do your homework yourself.
392872
Potted Leibnitz\nhttp://www.maths.tcd.ie/pub/HistMath/People/Leibniz/RouseBall/RB_Leibnitz.html\nPotted Descartes\nhttp://www.maths.tcd.ie/pub/HistMath/People/Descartes/RouseBall/RB_Descartes.html\n\nI can't find anything in common between the two except work on curves but everybody does that... maybe you'll have better luck.
426471
Wrong category.  Try this one in the mathematics category.
67792
Go to http://library.thinkquest.org/20331/types/
669739
http://www.psych.umn.edu/psylabs/vpr/msqinf.htm
315781
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Neil_Hawes/theory.htm\nhttp://www.musictheory.net/\nhttp://musiced.about.com/od/musictheory/
445823
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Indexes/HistoryTopics.html\nhttp://archives.math.utk.edu/topics/history.html\nhttp://aleph0.clarku.edu/~djoyce/mathhist/\nhttp://www.dcs.warwick.ac.uk/bshm/resources.html
30301
I've seen similiar ideas before.  I think you are on to something.  Start writing all these ideas down and also do a lot of reading ... science, metaphysics, etc.  Look for a book called "The White Book" by Ramtha.
493007
try cliffnotes.com or bookrags.com
294977
INTRODUCTION\nFor starters, psychology must be distinguished from behavioural science and psychiatry from neuromedicine. Psychology and psychiatry are subtly different to each other but it's important to realise that neither are scientific disciplines- they are pseudosciences.\n\nWHAT PSYCHOLOGY IS NOT\nPsychology is not behavioural science. Behavioural science is about observing the behaviour of living creatures and drawing conclusions about that behaviour and its causes and its consequences. The context of the behavioural science could be anything from criminology to neuromedicine.\n\nWHAT PSYCHIATRY IS NOT\nPsychiatry is not neuromedicine. Neuromedicine is about healing a physical, observable anomoly in tissue that is causing a problem with the nervous system resulting in observable, behavioural symptoms such as tardive dyskinsea, motor disfunction, etc. or at the very least treating the conditions and problems that arise from the neurological problem if it cannot be mended. Neuromedicine is genuine medicine and it is entirely scientific. Genuine neurophysicians are not psychiatrists.\n\nWHAT PSYCHOLOGY IS\nPsychology comes from the Greek word "psuche" which refers to the soul, spirit or mind of a person. Behavioural studies are science but making suggestive comments about the mind, soul and spirit is the realm of religion. Psychology is not science; it is pseudoscience. Psychology, by making statements about the mind, soul and spirit- in unbiblical terms- is simply another false religion. The ideas in psychology (i.e. the religious ideology) is all about "self-" me me me. It is ideological in the very same way that communism, naziism and all other fascist movements are ideological. The ideology is pushed down people's throats but made to look "gentle." So "psychotherapy" is made to look helpful and dressed up as medicine. But it has NO FACTUAL BASIS. It is a false religion. Because it has no factual basis, coersion is utilised to ensure people follow it. This is where psychiatry comes in.\n\nWHAT PSYCHIATRY IS\nPsychiatry is a coersive, controlling regime. It is witchdoctoring under the guise of medicine. The religious ideology of psychology is pedalled but it is rammed down people's throats with threats of terrible torture, mutilation, poisoning, incarceration, segregation and deprivation of livelihood. Psychiatrists lie to people. They make out that man ought to be a self-serving entity and that he has no need for God. Hypnosis using mind-altering drugs is practiced to weaken people's resolve. The Greek word for this hypnosis is "pharmakeia" which is translated in The Bible as witchcraft (Gal 5:20). The drugs in psychiatry are usually seen as different to the drugs on the street but in fact they do the very same thing as the street drugs people use "illegally" to get high. In fact sometimes the drugs in psychiatry are the very same drugs as the ones on the street. The coersion and control doesn't just stop with poisoning people with drugs. Incarceration without trial is routinely used and, in the context of psychological indoctrination, this is just inquisition. Other tactics are used which are equally violent. The victim of psychiatry is usually branded for life in a way that makes him out to be subhuman, a "diseased" subcitizen, a criminal with a record but no evidence of a crime, a punishable target for bullies on fat salaries with no moral backbone but great tendency to judge others.\n\nCONCLUSION\nSo here's your answer: psychology and psychiatry are witchcraft and witchdoctoring. They come under the collective term "witchery" which is just plain and simply false religion. It is a violent, coersive regime and a load of rubbish.
80679
what three theories..list them please.
49300
I have a copy of the second edition. Is that good enough?\n\nIs there something in particular you need, or do you want the outline of the whole book?\n\n1. Set theory\nIntroduction\nFunctions\nUnions, Intersections, and complements\nAlgebra of sets\nThe axiom of chice and infinite direct product\nCountable sets\nRelations and equivalences\nPartial orderings and the maximal principle\nWell ordering and the countable ordinal\n\nPart One -- Theory of Functions of a Real Variable\n\n2. The Real Number System\n\nAxioms for the real numbers\nThe natural and rational numbers as subsets of R\nThe extended real numbers\nSequences of real numbers\nOpen and closed sets of real numbers\nContinuous functions\nBorel sets\n\n3. Lebesgue Measure\nIntroduction\nOuter measure\nMeasurable sets and Lebesgue measure\nA nonmeasurable set\nMeasurable functions\nLittlwood's three principles\n\n4. The Lebesgue Integral\nThe Riemann integral\nThe Lebesgue integral of a bounded function over a set of finite measure\nThe integral of a nonnegative function\nThe general Lebesque integral\nConvergence in measure\n\n5. Differentiation and Integration\nDifferentiation of a monotone function\nFunction of bounded variation\nDifferentiation of an integral\nAbsolute continuity\nConvex functions\n\n6. The Classical Banach Spaces\nThe Lp spaces\nThe Holder Minkowski inequalities\nConvergence and completeneww\nBounded linear functionsals on the Lp spaces\n\n\nPart Two -- Abstract Spaces\n\n7. Metric Spaces\nIntroduction\nOpen and closed sets\nContinuous function and homeomorphisms\nConvergence and completeness\nUniform continuity and uniformity\nSubspaces\nBaire category\n\n8. Topological Spaces\nFundamental notions\nBases and countability\nThe separation axioms and continuous real-valued functions\nProduct spaces\nConnectedness\nAbsolute (G delta)\nNets\n\n9. Compact Spaces\nBasic properties\nCountable compactness and the Bolzano-Weierstrass property\nCompact metric spaces\nProducts of compact spaces\nLocally compact spaces\nThe Stone-Cech compactification\nThe Stone-Weierstrass theorem\nThe Ascoli theorem\n\n10. Banach Spaces\nIntroduction\nLinear Operators\nLinear Functionals and the Hahn-Banach theorem\nThe closed graph theorem\nTopological vector spaces\nWeak topologies\nConvexity\nHilbert space\n\nPart Three -- General Measure and Integration Theory\n\n11. Measure and Integration\nMeasure spaces\nMeasurable functions\nIntegration\nGeneral convergence theorems\nSigned measures\nThe Radon-Nikodym theorem\nThe Lp spaces\n\n12. Measure and Outer Measure\nOuter measure and measurability\nThe extension theorem\nThe Lebesgue-Stieltjes integral\nProduct measures\nInner measure\nExtension by sets of measure zero\nCaratheodory outer measure\n\n13. The Daniell Integral\nIntroduction\nThe extension theorem\nUniqueness\nMeasureability and measure\n\n14. Measure and Topology\nBaire sets and Borel sets\nPositive linear functionals and Baire measure\nBounded linear fuctionals on C(X)\nThe Borel extension of a measure\n\n15. Mappings of Measure Spaces\nPoint mappings and set mappings\nMeasure algebras\nBorel equivalences\nSet mappings and point mappings ofn complete metric spaces\nThe isometries of Lp
52948
try textbook411 , its a great book search tool
87975
A good place to start looking is the Wikipedia entry at:\n\n http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equality\n\n\nSome of the properties of equality are generalized by the concept of an equivalence relation. Google for (there are no spaces in what follows)\n\n define:equivalence-relation\n\n\nSee also Leibnitz's Identity of indiscernibles:\n http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottfried_Leibniz\n  (at least the "The Principles" section)\n http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_of_indiscernibles
539325
I believe this methodological approach compares data from observation of natural phenomena, rather than controlled experiments, to make a credible claim. It may not be feasible, legal, or ethical to do certain experiments, so you basically have to look at what's happening in nature to infer conclusions. Maybe try looking up 'natural experiment' or 'comparative method?'
584852
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_psychology\nhttp://elvers.stjoe.udayton.edu/history/welcome.htm\nhttp://www.psychology.org/\nhttp://www.geocities.com/Athens/Delphi/6061/en_linha.htm\nhttp://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/historyofpsych.html
554134
I think it's a good idea for students to see both (I'll call them "theories")  Use a comparison: Are students exposed to the writing style of Shakespeare only? Or, are they exposed to many writers?  If Ford was the only car offered for sale, how would a person know the points of other cars? The saying goes that "competition is healthy." Why not show more than one theory and let the student decide?