No child actors, maybe just CGI?\nWhy or why not?
204374
Yes, because children should not be portrayed as sex objects...simple as that.
348723
For American cartoons, I'd go for anything by Pixar or Dreamworks or whatever CGI companies are makin movies these days (Happy Feet, Cars, Finding Nemo, etc.)\n\nThere's always anime...but it's far better than...cartoons ^_^
234953
If I were invisible? Angelina Jolie? Spy?\nAhhhh, an interesting proposition, and a notion I have actually entertained.\nAllowing for wind direction and compensating for relative humidity, and lets not forget being invisible, I would help mankind by producing newer and better celebrity "sex tapes". I do not know about you but the pick-ins I have been downloading lately have been pretty slim. I could care less about Scott Stapp and Kid Rock or any of the other infamous tapes floating around. Nope I would film quality stuff. "Brad & Angelina", "The Bush twins" "Demi and Ashton"(who doesn't want to know if he calls her Mommy).\nIt would be win, win situation for mankind, womenkind I could not tell you, but it would definately benefit the guys.
138563
People make movies for one reason and one reason only...to make money. It's the business movies makers are in. If it wasn't for the profit and fame do you really think they would spend the time and effort to do it? If there were a DaVinci code,and if it were meaningful or meant for Christians to need to know it, it would be mentioned somewhere in the Bible. Since it's not in the Bible, it nothing more than a make-believe story.
321999
No, don't do that. That was a great movie. Good acting, good directing. You're probably posting this in response to the question, "Should the DaVinci Code be Banned?" I don't like that question either.
366764
Just saw this at the World 3-D Film Expo and wasn't overly taken with this re-imagining of the original. If it weren't for the use of the 3-D and CGI this would be headed straight to the bargain DVD section of your local Walmart.\n\nI really wanted to like this movie more than I did. It had lots going for it. A sold-out premier in high definition 3-D using the polarized glasses instead of the inferior red/blue glasses. They used special cameras as well as stedicam in shooting the entire movie. So, it looked as good as it was going to get.\n\nBut...geeking out is just not enough to carry an entire movie...\n\nThe script was clunky with some odd use of dated language mixed with present day dialog. A couple mis-castings didn't help matters much either.\n\nAnd, it just wasn't creepy or scary...at all...
558471
like the music, the voice, and the graphics, very good job\n\ni just don't care for the star-wars type scene, but that is only me because my brothers taught me not to like it as a little child.\n\ngood luck with that type of work, i think you can go far with it.
667880
Boohbah...\nI was a preschool teacher and never ever in my life would I ever allow my students nor my own kids to watch a show with weird looking creatures that babble in baby talk with no meaning whatsoever in what they are doing or where they are going....I think the person who created this show was high on drugs and not all there....I would be so embarrassed to be the director, writer, camera man, make up artist, etc for this show. I cannot believe that they actually air this stupid thing...\nThe teletubbies are almost as equally scary...what's up with British children are they all that stupid? Are they all high on drugs...At least with Barney (though annoying at times) he gives the kids advice, structure and teaches them some sort of message like how to keep yourself clean, how to share, etc...on the other shows they have nothing but weird baby talk....For younger kids put in a Baby Einstein movie and its great for them...its good for ages newborn to two years old...then they have little Einsteins for the the toddler preschool age group...sheesh why would pbs allow this type of programing I have no idea
669534
I don't think so... it would more be like the fairy tale where the boy gets a magic thread on a spindle that represents his life, and the more he pulls out, the faster it goes. eventually he pulls it out almost all the way to the end and doesn't get to really enjoy it, even though he skipped the boring/ annoying parts (he eventually gets to have it put back in the end).\n\nThat, and I think it plays on a vague fantasy that a lot of people have about "universal remotes". so many people wish they could mute, or pause, or fast forward, or reverse things in their life.\n\nbut knowing Adam Sandler's penchant for off-beat flicks, it should end up very similar to his "Billy Madison" or "Happy Gilmore" roles. and you can take that either way.
634636
I think if you're going to make an 'artsy' movie with little dialogue, you need to have lots of action.\n\n"The New World" didn't.  \n\nWhat a snooze.
451595
I have not seen it yet, so don't give up hope.  I know I have seen some baby lookalike pictures, but non that were adult yet.   \n\nHer show is so good.
578286
you're not alone.\ni watched it once and okay.. it's a disney movie. whatever.\nthen it was huge and im still wondering if ppl are serious about this.. it's not that great.\npeople should get over it.. especially they're over 10.\nbut o well.. people these days...
427743
No it isn't. The themes are too mature for children. Not so much inappropriate but boring for a child. Your 8 year old will get restless and you won't be able to enjoy the movie.
42698
That's really funny. My friends brother had an idea sort of like that. He said that instead of wasting money on special effects movie companies should just take death row inmates and use them. I acctually think that's almost a good idea. The death sentance is way too easy for some of the people on it, so this would be a way to make it a bit more fitting.
368774
Right!  I am with ya..\nit is not so good but have to admit that it's not so bad...\nSome of the scene may deserve better production..\nbut above all, I think that it's some kinda movie that is not very interesting but won't make u feel disappointed and turned off the dvd player.
314539
I agree. 2-D cartoons will always be classic. The only reason Pixar is so successful is because of the stories they choose to illustrate. Other movie studios just jumped on the bandwagon when they saw how successful Pixar was, and decided to pump out CG animation too but they didn't realize that just because it's 3D doesn't mean it'll be a big hit.
291374
There's this creative writing theory about "suspension of disbelief" that says that readers/moviegoers will maintain their attention as long as the ideas presented are not too far off from reality.  So you would have trouble with a movie about a completely alternate existence where nothing approximates human life and completely different laws of nature and physics and reality apply.\n\nAlternatively, it could be something as simple as someone that - for no reason whatsoever - likes someone that hits them in the head or cuts them... Might be good for satire or comedy, but makes no sense in drama unless we're talking Wuthering Heights.