there will always be people on the top, getting richer and powerful every day in every single country, while there is people without jobs, under educated or dying of hunger, either under Communism, Capitalism, or Socialism.
199570
Nope.  As humans are inherently imperfect, our governments and economic systems will be also!
359467
no they won't  b/c if they did then i don't think there would be poor people in this world b/c the jobs are endless when it comes to picking fruits and vegetable and working in hot ass sewing factories.  many americans wouldn't be caught dead working in places like that, they would rather get on welfare and live off of others.
220489
As long as there is humans and money there will be greed and corruption.
264448
With capitalism comes greed and with greed, comes poverty.
16101
What you are talking about is something that already exists in our world in some societies. It is known as communism and follows the ideal that everyone is 'equal' regardless of their career and qualities. \n\nHowever, many people, especially those who are part of a democracy are strongly against it, simply because people like to have power.
278042
maybe a million of them would starve to death in their own country .  but there are lots more
124026
The country is founded under the idea of the material success. To contribute to this material success, they need to get people unhappy so that they consume more products to fill the emptiness they have in their soul.\n\nThat is the cause that they are always unhappy and in denial.
105822
Then there would be huge economic difference between the races, since the races which has always be rich will continue to be rich, while the poor will continue to be poor.
150315
People have it way worse then you. You're rich compared to people in poorer countries. Think of them starving, next time you think it's the end of the world when you can't buy the newest camera phone. Money isn't everything.
147718
Yes this is true. We could have billions of money and still want more. People always want, want, want . They never think of the third world and be grateful for what you have even if it mightn't be alot compared to what others have
166534
Someone else is asking pretty much the same question.  As I replied on the other question, the biggest indicator of what ones economic status will be during their lifetime is to simply look at the economic status of their parents/grandparents.  The majority of the wealthy had a head start due to better education and other opportunities and then simply built upon the vast assets they inherited.  My solution (I know it sounds like communism) was to seize everybodys personal assets when the pass away and redistribute them to pay for the deficit, healthcare, taxes, and better school districts/educational opportunities for everyone.  This would certainly even the playing field and provide for an incentive to compete (which is the basis of capitalism isn't it?).  The capitalist system wouldn't suffer because everyone would still be able to enjoy the fruits of their labor during their lifetime and may actually be enhanced by the the fact that the best/brightest/most ambitious would continually be the ones that prosper each generation.
318078
Yes there is a survival of the fittest among humans too. It's called social stratification. That is, if I understand your question. please write in English next time.
341611
every one is human being
156438
Well in a capitalist system there are many losers the US government is a money making government that has its own agenda its not about you, look how our country was developed and the principles of their wealth. A person can have a vision but the person will need labor/money to achieve that vision so now that slave labor is no longer legal they must us the next best thing paid slave labor, people forced to work for minimum wage or less like many USA born citizens migrants they have no choice at the time so they will slave for the crumbs and no one thinks anything about it because we know they are getting paid the American workers need to wake up,our children's lives are at stake, we need to curtail the migrants movement and force the push on minimum wage
315950
Yes, the developed countries of the world have the resources to wipe out starvation all over the globe. Will it ever happen? I truly doubt it. You see, children have no money, they don't control any oil fields and  they can't keep the big corporations and weapons manufacturers in business. Children also have no political clout, they can't make things happen, they don't vote. In other words they aren't very useful to the politicians. Thats why they starve to death.
217220
I disagree.  This is basically a communist idea.  The Universal Living Wage would cause america to lose a ton of jobs to lower wage countries.  We are already having problems competeing with counrtries that pay their workers 500 dollars a year.  This would drastically raise unemployment which is bad especially for poor people.  We would be looking at unemployment rates like those found in France and Germany of around 12 percent.  It would also stunt long term growth.  Everyone in America can eat well enough.  I have know obese people who were on welfare.  People in America are well off, poverty is more of a relative thing.  Poor people in America still have a lot more than people in the Sudan.  It is only when compared to insanely rich people in Manhattan that they seem so poor.  That is not to say that poverty is not a problem in America it is, but a Universal Living Wage would amplify this problem not fix it.
96686
It is the only way to ensure equal economic opportunity.  All other systems try to make equallity of outcome, which is impossible.  Even at it's best socialism and communism stifles innovation and opportunity.