Hey guys...I need your help with my psychology class!!! :)\nPlease comment on how sure you are of your answers...thanks soooo much!!!\n\n64. The self-esteem of young Americans tends to _______ while progressing through the early teen years and _______ while progressing through the late teen years.\nA) rise; fall \nB) fall; rise \nC) rise; rise \nD) fall; fall \n\n65. Compared with males, females are more likely to base their sense of personal identity on their:\nA) gender. \nB) social relationships. \nC) educational accomplishments. \nD) socially distinctive personality traits. \n\n66. When looking for someone to tell their personal worries to, women usually turn to ________ and men usually turn to ________.\nA) men; men \nB) women; men \nC) women; women \nD) men; women
210680
64) b\n\n65)b\n\n66)c\n\n90 percent sure
130599
If you are a college student, check with your psychology department. Any developmental psychology videos would probably cover some aspect of brain development.  You could also look at medical references as well.  For a more general "get it now" type of thing you might want to just do a search using a P2P program limiting your results to videos.  Also, what age range are you looking for? The brain basically continues to physically develop until the late teens (17-19). Mental development, of course, is a lifelong process.
402327
The target gender, along with the responding gender, affected attitudes about...\n\nYou need to specify what attitudes were affected and how.  Then the sentence will make sense.\n\nHope this helps.  Cheers, K
573774
How about this one: "I'm O.K., You're O.K.". It's an old book but many times underachieving is caused by low self-esteem. Good luck.
324061
idk... i thought girls from everywhere were sl**s, wh****, and bi*****s.  you know, i never really thought that amercians were that way.  we have a bad reputation with every country... i just never heard that one before.  we're fat, lazy, rich, and now were sl**s.  isnt that great?  lol... it might be influence of the media or sumthin that they don't have in all the other countries, maybe because we do more drugs, maybe its because they kno if they dont give in they might be another statistic for teen rape... who knows? im american, but i cant speak for anyone but myself.
109387
There is a  fine line between stereotyping\nand generalizing.  Example#1: boys are discipline\nproblems in school.  Are there more boys or girls in\ndetention?  Generally boys are in trouble because\nthey are more overt in their behavior, but are\nall boys causing problems?  #2 Rednecks are crude, \nbeer drinking, pickup driving guys (or gals) living \nin trailer parks.  Jeff Foxworthy helps with that.\n#3 Blonds are dumb....enough said.
397055
1. Start with the basics - demographics. Clearly you need a gender M/F question but you might also want age, occupation and living status for example.\n\n2. Then add a bunch of attitude statements with a 5 point scale. Strongly agree ....strongly disagree with indifferent in the middle.\n\n3. Make sure your statements cover as many different points of view as possible. \n\n4. You could add a few other questions about other forms of buying to see if its specific to clothing or more generalised.\n\nImportantly you might aslo want to consider "in what ways male and females differ in their attitudes". I say this because your question above implies a yes or no answer. Open it up a bit and it'll also help you generate hypotheses too.\n\nCluster analysis is a "fun" way of playing with attitude statements after.\n\nHope this helps
44612
Nice effort and beneficial.\nThey want to trace back the details of human generations which are vague.\nWell, they "search" for Adam, right?\nThey must believe in creationism rather than evolution.\n\nHopefully people will realise that we humans are all the same. We came from the same root. No more racist solicitation.\nThe theory of evolution is focused mostly on physiques. They do not care to think that men have minds and spirit.\nIt is clearly wrong to define us physically just like the animals. We are better than animals. \nMoreover, we are the best creations. \n\nI do not really get the picture with the female ancestor to date earlier than the common male ancestor. Could you explain to me about that?\n\nIt is weird for woman and man to live not in the same time. How could they reproduce?\n\nMaybe I will come back later. By the way, I think "boffin" means buffoons.\n\n\n\nThank you Kurdiatcha for explaining to me.\nI was not expecting you but the questioner herself but thank you.\n\nI would like to edit some more but have no time.\nHere's a little correction:\n\nWhat I meant by define us physically just like the animals is to take ONLY physique into acount.\n\nThe brain differs from the mind. Animals have brains but not minds. They have life but not soul.\n\nBrain is physique. Mind is defined as the ability to learn and understand things by self, not gifted.\nOf course, we need the help of God to understand about something.\nMind is also the sign of rationality of humans.\n\nI will continue later.\n\n\n\nSorry for keeping you waiting so long, Nelly. I had to take time to make a structure of my next explainations which are:\nThis is going to be quite a LONG lecture.\n\n\nHuman = (Physique) (Mind) (Life) (Soul)\nAnimal = (Physique) (Life)\n\nPhysique = Physique?\nIt is most probably. If to follow the law of balance; equation and relation, Human seems to have more advantages such as Mind and Soul, therefore their Physique must be less advantageous than that of Animal.\n\nLife = Life\n\nSoul = Mind (Feelings) (Life)\nMind = Soul (Life) (Physique)\nFeelings = (Physique) (Soul)\nMind ≠ Brain\nBrain = Mind (Physique) (Life) = Brain\nIn this context, Mind means the controller. Brain of Human and Brain of Animal are similar but not the same.\n\nMind = Soul\nMind + Soul (Animal) = Human\nMind and Soul are similar yet they are not one. Plus, they are parallel. Physique capsulizes Brain where in the Brain lies Mind. Life capsulizes Soul. The parallelism of both must be broken and should be met in order to achieve the same goal; finding God. \nOnce they have combined, the journey of finding God will be clearer.\n\nPhysique (Mind) + Life (Soul) = Human\nSoul + Mind ≠ Human\nPhysique + Life ≠ Human\n\nTherefore, Physique and Life make up Animal’s characteristics. Physique capsulizes Life and Life enlivens Physique. It is mutual symbiosis.\n\nPhysique, Mind, Life and Soul make up Human’s characteristics. Physique capsulizes Life, Soul and Mind, Life and Soul enlivens Physique, Mind controls Physique and Life, so does Soul. Soul controls Mind but Mind decides initially.\n\nConsider Human like a box (Physique) powered by Life externally. Inside the box, there is a ball of Soul and Mind; Mind takes up only the core while Soul is the ball inside out. With the ball, the box is generated internally.\n\nThe three parts: Physique, Life and Soul must be available in order for a Human to love but irrationally minded. Therefore, Mind is the only part of rationality. It is the only part of intelligence.\n\n\nThe above equations show the difference between Human and Animal. I know it is quizzical to you, so it is to me.\nThe sign with the small "l" is actually a small number 1, indicates Human.\n\nWell, if we to trace the generations of human, we must primarily try to understand human. If you do not understand anything, tell me. I will try to make you understand the equation. Even I do n
207267
Exactly, men and women will have sex with what they find attractive.  So keep looking for that person that enjoys your company and body type.  They do exhist.  Unfortionately, younger generations are influenced by the media and their peers.  Pretty soon people grow up and start being themselves.
28583
Guys are deeper than it appears.  Looks are always the first attraction and for most younger ones it's important to show off for their friends, but later it's not so important, then compatability takes over. Young marriages usually break up around this time.  But as you get to know someone they either get better to be with or worse.  So personality is omni-important.  There are, of course, shallow people who go through their whole life looking for the better looking or richer or whatever but they don't represent the majority.
186710
He displays more feminine qualities than masculine ones. I just think he hasn't been exposed to sex, hanging out, just being less uptight. He probably has been sheltered and just hasn't came out of it yet. He needs to though, it is not cool to be this old and not acting mature. As for the females, he might just be intimidated by them, but as for acting like a mature college student, he needs to grow up, he is a bad role model for the children he babysits.
341630
#1. Got that low self-esteem thing going on?\n#2.  A real-life bully-nice.\n#3.  Finish and move on.\n#4.  That was a waste of breath.\n#5.  Feel special now?\n#6.  That was low....great job.\n#7.  Such a low person-- why? \n#8.  This......makes you happy.\n#9.  You are clearly a waste of time.\n#10. You are very skilled at being disgusting.\n#11. That'a right genius---we are different.\n#12.  Only words.\n#13.  Were you born to do this?\n#14.  Ouch!  that was heartless.\n#15.   Strike me pink. \n#16.   New talent.  \n#17.   You are  so full of yourself, you are pratically      \n          choking.\n#18.   Tell me how did you find America?
672654
good job!!   \nLet me see if I can get 10pts. from you!\n\nA professor wrote on the blackboard:  a woman withourt her man is nothing\n\nHe then asked the class to punctuate it.  \n\nThe guys wrote: "A woman, without her man, is nothing!"\nThe girls wrote: "A woman, without her, man is nothing!"
98541
First, good for you!  \n\nThe cross-cultural study of sexuality and gender is incredibly complex, and 7-10 minutes is short! Also, worldwide statistics on sexuality are not easy to come by.\n\nHowever, I'll do my best to give you references to some sources where you can begin to get an overview of your topic.\n\nHere's a book that might be of interest:\nBrettell and Sargent, Gender in Cross-Cultural Perspective\n\nCheck the wikipedia sites I've placed below.  Native American constructions of gender and sexuality might be a good place to start, since I assume it's "closer to home" for most of your classmates.\n\nAnd then follow some of the links in at the bottom of the secon wiki article. Note especially the terms "mudang, "kathoe," "hijra," and "mahu."\n\nI hope this helps -- if you need further assistance, either add to or edit this question or post another one -- I'll keep an eye out!
160915
Self-confidence. If you are confident (or try to be) and don't care about what people would think when you state your opinion, thats an attractive factor. I'm not a guy, but i've been 13 b4!
464754
Sorry to intrude (I'm a guy) but I think you need to be more specific about what sort of women you have in mind.  I have a bit of experience with women, and I can tell you they each look for different things.  Young women tend to be more idealistic (speak about things like "honest, caring, sensitive, handsome, ...") while some more mature women are looking for stability ("commitment, financial stability, supportive, ...").  Only one answer mentions "money" but I think it's naive to not stress that.  Most women are looking for a successful, confident guy, who will be able to take care of them (I have never met a woman who didn't love a nice gift).  I almost forgot "smart/capable" - woman seem to really like that too.
413932
depends which society u're talking about...different cultures rear their men differently....but generally women tend to be more emotional and feelings-based than men.