UT leads the series, but what is the actual win loss record?
204447
Texas leads the all-time seiries 73-34-5
515058
There are not too many in walking distance and plus you have already waited too long to book a room.  GO VOLS!!!!!  Not a hard game to win.
135434
The best I could find is win/loss record since 1987.\n\nMaddux played 6 games in 1986, so I couldn't find stats for wins against in that year.\n\nHowever, Maddux is 18-16 against the Reds and 34-16 against the Mets.
365344
It will be the Longhorns vs the Corhhollers and the cornhollers will lose again.  \n\nI'm not sure which BCS game the Big XII champ goes to.
394311
Chivas lost 2:3\n=[\n\nVeracruz\nH Mansilla (31)\nA Sandoval (53)\nH Mansilla (62)\n\nGuadalajara\nA Medina (15)\nH Reynoso (30)
676180
Let's use cosaxteacher's argument and break it down.\n\nThere are 9 teams in the AL at .500 or better.  Which means there are 5 teams under .500.  The 9 that are over and how many games they are over right now: Boston +18, NY +11, Toronto +8, Detroit +29, Chicago +24, Minnesota +7, Oakland +6, Texas +3, Seattle even.  The 5 that are under: Baltimore -6, Tampa Bay -12, Cleveland -6, KC -25, LA -7.  You could say that teams are winning at the expense of KC and TB, but they don't account for all of the margins.  106 games over vs. 56 under.\n\nNL.  8 teams over or at .500 - New York +18, St. Louis +8, Cincinnati +5, Milwaukee even, San Diego +4, LA +2, Colorado +1, San Francisco even.  8 teams under - Philadelphia -6, Florida -6, Atlanta -12, Washington -12, Houston -3, Chicago -20, Pittsburgh -26, Arizona -3.  38 over vs. 88 under.\n\nNL has 1 team that's 10 games over or more and 4 that are 10 games under or more.  AL has 4 teams that are 10 games over or more and 2 that are 10 under or more.\n\nThe NL is bad.
246526
ok say the Yankees are 21-10\nand the red sox are    18-12\n\nyankees won 2 more so thats 2 games\nand red sox loss 3 more so that 3\n2 + 3 = 5 \n5/2=2.5\ntherefore the yankees are 2.5 games up\nits the average between games won and loss\nhope this helps
483993
I think you are correct.\nI seriously doubt they win 80 games.\nAll the while I can hear their fans\ncrying "it's not fair, we're better\nthan The Tigers!"\n\nI found it amusing that in the 2006 regular season\nthe whinny sux beat The Tigers 15 of 19 games\nand still couldn't make the playoffs!\n\nYou are absolutely right, the southside crybabies\n(aka the whinny sux) are looking towards several\nconsecutive season of sub .500 ball!
336609
Tigers hands down.\n\n7-0\n\nRoyals SUCK this year, YUCK!
264880
yep. series is tied 3-3
230054
spurs are going to lose the series 4-2
465121
They r 8 won- 3 lost\nGo Patriots
377603
even if they were to lose to a team as bad as Army, i dont think they would drop lower than 15. They're currently ranked #5 so the lowest they would drop to is about #15. They only way they would be able to stay in the top 10 is if there were a lot of upsets in the top 10 today but i don't see that happening.
337592
I'll quote Charles Barkley here:  "In a seven game series, the better team almost always wins."  \n\nIn a five game series, the weaker team can get a lucky streak going.  But the Suns coming back this post-season and the Spurs catching the Mavs is a clear indicator that the better team can come back in a seven game series.  But if either of these series had been 5 game series like the NBA USED to have, both would be gone.  \n\nIn a longer series, the better team usually wins.
575703
No Carolina is up 3-1 in the series. Tonight is game five and could be the end for Edmonton. The series has been a good one. Carolina won games 1, 2 and 4. Carolina has been skating circles around the Oilers.
540288
4.unmessy loss?,\n    neat defeat\n\nthat's all I got...
212737
It is like this\n1. Division winner with the best record\n2. Division winner with the 2nd best record\n3. Division winner with the worst record\nThen it goes by record till the last seed.