scientist have succeeded in making robocops, why haven't they been able to make a human as God did.
204767
most things that scientists have made are duplicates of what God has already created but they have not be able to make LIFE. They cant make "real human" because the source of life is with God.
605659
I agree. I have always had an answer that combines both.  When they( Adam and Eve) were banished from The Garden of Eden (punishment for eating the apple) they were told they would be amongst the lowest  life forms. Why could He not have sent them back as a bacterium, as part of punishment, with his divine plan to go through years (even millions of years) of evolution to finally be back to human form. If he is God, evolution could be part of his Divine Plan.
299682
Is possible, but the most interesting thing is that we are alein too. Our DNA could not evolutioned in the time that we knows. The scientist and co-discoverer of the structure of the DNA molecule, Francis Crick says that our DNA came altrhough artificial mechanism to the earth because the structure is so complicated and a meteor would have damage it. In the OT God is talking so strange, like a Human Being, he feel emotions, good and destructive emotions, obviously he could to be not the real God or the creator of the Universe, may be He was a Super Natural being showing to us the real path to the S`piritual Evolution. May be He was the responsible of many strange things that the cience only could to explain with the Super Natural Being Intervention. We knows now that we was guided by a being that could to make many things in the earth like the big structures and complicated engginner or advanced technology found in the History in many cultures who said that thir Gods could to be seen.\n\nIs possible it if we take the references in the Zecharia Sitchin studies when the cultures show us the relationship between God and the Human Beings. Interesting parts like in Genesis 6 show us that the "Angels" had sex with human beings having physical body, knowing that the Angels like our Lord Jesus Christ says can not to get married. Is so interesting because may be Jesus Christ came to the heart from the real God, changing the old concepts about God and the old laws. Why Jesus would change the laws? What relationship could to have Jesus with the God in the old testament? Why the law changed so drastically? May be the Super Natural being that was trying to show us the real path to the spirituality fails in his try and Jesus, may be like a superior lader or a real representation from God came to repair the wrong concept created before. With JesusChrist all humans beings could to be saved, not only the Jews people, all world could to be saved.\n\nFor this rason the God in OT could to be from other reality, other dimenssion, not from the other planet, because he really was a creator and a Super natural being and is a big question that probably nobody will answer until the ned of the time.
677221
No one created him and gave him power .. then how would him be a God if there is something bigger ? God is the greatest !!
295532
God uses evolution as part of His plan.
96661
Yes, even a cloned being has a heart, blood, nerves, brain, feelings, emotions, capabilities, etc. He should have the right to live no matter how he was brought into being.
53444
You pretty much answered this one yourself....We aren't God almighty.  \n\nCloning is 'making' a human being and that is God's job.\n\nTest tube babies are like throwing the ingredients for a cake into a bowl and letting a cake make itself - it can't be done unless an outside force plays a part (call it God, or Mother Nature or whatever you choose.)\n\nThere is too much power behind the cloning of humans and it could be disasterous if the ability to do it got into the wrong hands.  How many Bin Laden's would we want in this world??
427378
Given enough time, sure.  What will motivate them to do it?  Probably, "ooh, do you know what would be cool", or "hey, Disney will pay us 4 billion dollars to make a fire breathing dragon".  So boredom or greed.  Either way, a genetically engineered dragon in the future is not impossible.  \n\nI am not sure how much work would be needed and of course the dragon will only have the attributes that physics and biology can.  Such as, a Godzilla size creature is more than likely impossible.  Far too large, there is a lot of physics explaining why something that large just cannot live.  The size of the dragon vs. the ability to fly.  If they make it really large then it will probably not be able to fly, but a tiny flying dragon is not too impressive.  The firebreathing will probably not be that great either.  It will more than likely not be a napalm type explosion, but more of a methane type poof.\n\nAlso, for other creatures.  It would probably be impossible to engineer a werewolf.  The biology to change a man to wolf from just the moonlight is not there.  A medusa can be made but she would not be able to turn people to stone with her glare, just hang around with snakes for hair.  Vampires might be a little easier, a creature that drinks blood and is killed by exposure to direct sunlight.  However, that is pretty much the limits, no changing to bats or being invulnerable to all attacks except for wooden stakes and sunlight.  Also, it would not be able to convert others to vampirism thru a bite.  Well, more than likely not.  A retrovirus to change the recepients DNA might happen, but that would probably just kill the victem and not change them.\n\nSo I believe it will be possible within the limits of science to see creatures with traits resembling aspects of mythological creatures in the next few centuries.
183272
We are already close to being able to cloning people.  I don't think it is already done because it would be a huge victory to who ever that did it.  I don't think there is any difference between cloned human and natural human.  I read that due to chromosome markers cloned subject have a problem of premature aging.  Other than that the animal that is clone seem normal enough.  I don't think we really need cloning since most human attribute come from our experience and our free will.  Having the right gene just isn't enough.  Also since there are too many people already there is really no reason to clone people.  Now if we did have a nuclear exchange or a virus breakout where the population become threatened, than we may have cloning.  I don't know, it is too complicated a subject right now.
487953
Apparently if he revealed himself it would be against his rules.  Some have said "no one wants a robot to love them... you wouldn't have a choice to believe if he showed himself, you'd have to".\n\nYeah.... and?  I think, as a deity, I'd prefer "robot"-like belief to my creations being cast down to Hell in droves for being incapable of conceiving of something so wonky as a God.
12694
god created man. and man is NOT perfect
533938
Very thought provoking question! I am suprised that the responses you have received so far have been either negative or incomplete. It does pose a serious problem for conservative minded people. If the creation of a "Frankenstein" embryo by the hands of man is a religious abomination as you postulate, then supporting its existance is an equal abomination. But then comes the right to life issue. So far the responses seem to have been "well, too late to do anything about it". I think those responses are cop outs.\n\nI think that, should God make available to man the technology to perform such acts, then God must want us to be capable of doing it, otherwise he would prevent it.  Interestingly, it calls into question fundamental religious beliefs of whether or not this might be a "test" by God...\n\nI really dont have an off the cuff answer. This has provoked a lot of questions in my mind, and I have to sit back and think about it carefully for awhile. Thanks for the great question.
503807
More important. If man was made from dirt, why is dirt not still turning into people?
606694
Yes because humans were made as soon as Earth was created by God.
102650
I agree with you on the bible.People do not seem to relize that God did not write the bible that man did.Their are so many things about it that just confuse the hell out of me. I think he wanted to see if we would choose him on our own based on all the different ideas of him floating around this world. We are just rats in a maze.Wouldnt it really be something if we were some science experiment for a more intelligent being
86296
Theoretically yes, if you can get the full DNA structure. Realistically, science isn't quite there yet. I suspect there is much being done in secret because of public fear of the unknown. We've done sheep, and parts of humans, ears, noses etc. Won't be long. The big question is if you clone the whole person, who is really that person and does the clone have a soul? That's a whole other discussion!
316580
with biotechnology and atomic restructuring yes it will someday be possible.\nThe research in nanobots is coming along faster that expected then they were developed.\nWhat needs to be done now is learn to change the molecule structure of trash to food.\nLike cotton to rice.