question is not clear correct? yes, to explain my doubt also so tough, better if you fill in the blank below it may answer me.\n\nquestion: _______son are you to your father/ mother?\n\nanswer: I am the second son to my father.\n\nyou got my question?
212709
You got a way with words buddy.  3rd son of my father.
81821
no, Because you asked "Are you going to the party?" The answer is "I am going to the party."\n\nIf you asked "Is the person going to the party George?" Then the answer is "The person going to the party is me."\n\nIt depends on how you ask the question.
345705
The person who puts the obituary in can probably write what they like.  I would have thought 'partner of' would be more appropriate than 'wife of'.  The son question is a bit trickier.  It might depend on the length of their relationship and how the deceased thought of the boy.  If they had been together since the boy was very young and the deceased had raised him, then calling him son might be OK.  On the other hand, if the boy was an adult when they got together....
117272
You'll have to give more information and explain your question. It is not understandable as it's written. What do you mean by "create my self"? Please rewrite your question and add some details and then maybe someone could help you.
54099
he is a dad.the  dad is a step brother of the question asker.
219767
where is the village A .To explain it properly \nsuppose if a liar comes and i ask were is village A he shows village B as he is liar.Next if a truth person comes and i ask him were is village A he shows us the village A by which we can know 4r sure were the Village B is.
655480
Unfortunately both parents are in heaven, but my father, was more understanding, I knew he loved me dearly, he was a great father. My mother was very caring and loving, so when they were living I guess I'd have to say both. I know you said if they were living, but they still mattered at the time
303343
Clarify the question?
484643
1.\n\nThis question wasn't as clear.
143360
I can't believe that no-one has solved this !!!!!!\n\nThe father is currently 39 years old.\nThe son is currently 16 years old.\n\n- In 2 years time, the son will be 18 years old.\n- The father was 36 years old when he was "twice as old as the son will be in 2 years time".\n- The father was 36 years old....3 years ago !!!!\n- 3 years ago......the son was 13 years old....the father is now 3 times that age !!!!!\n\n- That leads to the first quote.....The father is 39 years old....which is 3 times as old as when the son was 13 years old (at which time the father was 36 years old...which was twice as old as the son will be in 2 years time).\n\nI really hope that you follow this !!!!!!!\n\nIf not, send me an e-mail and I'll try to explain it in a simpler manner !
13394
i would love to answer your question. but you lost me after only getting to God through son. the only way to get to God is through the son but i dont know if thats what your asking
581964
Do you really want to shake up everyone with this.  You are going to be telling a man the son he thought he had isn't his, a man he thought wasn't his, is his and most damaging is that a young boy's father isn't his father after all.  Unless there is some medical reason, leave this one alone.
495882
Yes, you could ask:\n\n1. What does this question mean?\n\n2. What do the answers mean?\n\nAnyone who gets it right gets an A.
502633
How is this a question?
454445
What a weird way to ask a question.  Just ask him!\n\na
120681
What is the question?
156207
clarify your question