XL Feb. 5, 2006 Pittsburgh 21, Seattle 10 \nXXXIX Feb. 6, 2005 New England 24, Philadelphia 21 \nXXXVIII Feb. 1, 2004 New England 32, Carolina 29 \nXXXVII Jan. 26, 2003 Tampa Bay 48, Oakland 21 \nXXXVI Feb. 3, 2002 New England 20, St. Louis 17 \nXXXV Jan. 28, 2001 Baltimore 34, N.Y. Giants 7 \nXXXIV Jan. 30, 2000 St. Louis 23, Tennessee 16 \nXXXIII Jan. 31, 1999 Denver 34, Atlanta 19 \nXXXII Jan. 25, 1998 Denver 31, Green Bay 24 \nXXXI Jan. 26, 1997 Green Bay 35, New England 21 \nXXX Jan. 28, 1996 Dallas 27, Pittsburgh 17 \nXXIX Jan. 29, 1995 San Francisco 49, San Diego 26 \nXXVIII Jan. 30, 1994 Dallas 30, Buffalo 13 \nXXVII Jan. 31, 1993 Dallas 52, Buffalo 17 \nXXVI Jan. 26, 1992 Washington 37, Buffalo 24 \nXXV Jan. 27, 1991 N.Y. Giants 20, Buffalo 19 \nXXIV Jan. 28, 1990 San Francisco 55, Denver 10 \nXXIII Jan. 22, 1989 San Francisco 20, Cincinnati 16 \nXXII Jan. 31, 1988 Washington 42, Denver 10 \nXXI Jan. 25, 1987 N.Y. Giants 39, Denver 20 \nXX Jan. 26, 1986 Chicago 46, New England
210103
You did good! You did good! It's really a good source for this one.
491024
NFL makes sense, your teams don't make sense,\n\n:>peace
422439
1. Titans\n2. Rams\n3.Cowboys\n4.Redskins\n5.Buffalo Bills\n6. Broncos\n7.Patriots\n8.Dolphins\n9.Ravens
345176
They've gotta start looking for that 2nd wildcard spot, and I don't think that one division has ever sent 3 teams to the playoffs in the history of the nfl.  They beat the Chargers once, barely, but that was in KC and the Chargers were riddled with injuries at the time, they won't beat them again.  They already lost to Denver once, but they kept it close, and that was in Denver.  Honestly, with the schedule these teams have, for the Chiefs to make the playoffs, they are going to need the Chargers to beat Denver next week, and they will need to beat Denver in two weeks.  Even then, it would be close towards the end of the season because they'd need another Denver loss.  Doesn't look good.
507561
The Green Bay Packers.  They have the longest history under the same name and in the same city.  They also have the most national championships with 12.  The bears probably are second but they haven't has as much success as the packers.
656304
That other PA team, the 1961 Phillies to be more specific...own the all time record of 23 consecutive losses. So the Buccos still got some ways to go...\n\n23 Philadelphia (NL), 1961 \n21 Baltimore (AL), 1988 \n20 Boston (AL), 1906 \n20 Philadelphia (AL), 1916 \n20 Philadelphia (AL), 1943 \n20 Montreal (NL), 1969 \n19 Kansas City (AL), 2005
378853
BBall, NY Knicks, NJ Nets, New Orleans Hornets, La Lakers, Minnesota Timberwolves, Utah Jazz, Miami Heat, Chicago Bulls, Seattle Sonics, boston celtics, houston rockets, dallas mavericks, phoenix suns, la clippers, golden state warriors\nFootball, Dallas cowboys, ny giants, ny jets, new england patriots, miami dolphins, baltimore ravens, oakland raiders, seattle seahawks, kansas city chiefs, houston texans, indy colts, green bay packers, carolina panthers\nBaseball, ny yankees, ny mets, boston red sox, chicago white sox, chicago cubs, florida marlins, atlanta braves, texas rangers, oakland athletics, kansas city royals, seattle mariners, la angels, la dodgers, san diego padres, baltimore orioles\nhockey, nj devils, ny rangers, ny islanders, boston bruins, philly flyers, calgary flames, buffalo sabres, carolina hurricanes, florida panthers, detroit red wings, chicago black hawks, la kings, tampa bay lightning, vancouver canucks, montreal candaniens,
487013
Along with the divisional realignment before the 2002 season, a scheduling algorithm was set up to ensure that (a) every team would play every other team at least once every four years, and host every other team at least once every eight; and (b) teams in the same division and conference (who would compete with each other for playoff spots) would have schedules as similar as practical, to aid in determining tiebreakers.\n\nThe scheduling algorithm breaks down as follows:  Each team has a 16-game season - six divisional games, six conference games (outside their own division), and four inter-conference games.\n\nThe six divisional games consist of two against each division opponent, one home and one away.\n\nThe four inter-conference games consist of one game against each member of one division in the other conference, two home and two away.  The division pairings rotate in a four-year cycle; it was set up to get as many relevant inter-conference games played early in the cycle as possible.  By this, I mean that the AFC West was paired with the NFC West in the first year, so that Seattle (which had been moved to the NFC) would be "eased" out of its old division.  Similarly, the AFC South was paired with the NFC East, so that expansion Houston would host state-mate Dallas in its first year (actually, in its first ever regular-season game).\n\nAs for the six conference games, four of them are played against all of one other division, two home and two away; the divisions are rotated every three years for this purpose.  This year, both East divisions play every team in their conference's South division, and the Norths play the Wests.  The other two games are determined by order of finish, and are played against the teams in the other two divisions that finished in the same position, one home and one away.  For instance, Philadelphia finished fourth in the NFC East last year; their six conference games consist of the NFC South, and Green Bay (fourth in the North last year) and San Francisco (fourth in the West).\n\nI hope this helps.  Email me if you want the full division rotation.
208145
California has:\nSan Francisco 49ers\nOakland Raiders\nSan Diego Chargers\n\nTexas:\nDallas Cowboys\nHoustan Texans\n\nFlorida:\nMiami Dolphins\nJacksonville Jaguars\nTampa Bay Buccaneers\n\nNew York:\nNew York Jets\nNew York Giants\nBuffalo Bills\n\nOhio:\nCleveland Browns\nCincinatti Bengals\n\nMissouri:\nKansas City Chiefs\nSt. Louis Rams\n \nPennslyvannia:\nPittsburgh Steelers\nPhiladelphia Eagles\n\nSo 7 cities or states have more than one football team. And there are a total of 17 teams.
404867
Super Bowl hangover, it happens to nearly all Super Bowl winners. Key free agent losses and the retirement of "The Bus" cost them a lot of the leadership they enjoyed last season. Injuries havent helped and the soap opera that was Big Ben over the summer certainly didnt help. They need to regroup and re- dedicate themselves to the goals they had last year and they will be fine. There is still plenty of talent wearing Steeler black.
628360
NFL.com!!  Then go to each teams individual site.  They have updated rosters with uniform #s.
199645
(5) 1958, 1962, 1970, 1994, 2002
644964
These two URL's will help you....\n\nYankees\nhttp://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/NYY/\n\nRed Sox\nhttp://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/BOS/\n\nClick on the year you want. From there you can easily click on the names one by one to see where they played the year prior.
208895
Go to this site.  You can add them up here.\n\nhttp://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/BOS/
516810
I don't have any stats on this so please let me know how I did. Common sense would say that Florida and Texas would be 2 big NFL contributors. Same with Ohio and Pennsylvania for the north. The fact that 20% of our country's population lives in California would mean that they have to be in the top 10. So that leaves 5 others. I will try to rule out states with real small populations even though you have already said that there are a few of them under 9 mil. How about Georgia, Virginia, Oklahoma, Illinois, Washington State?\n\nThose are my guesses but I will throw in honorable mentions to Michigan, Indiana, Nebraska, Tennessee, N Carolina , Alabama,\nMisouri & Mississipi\n\nThanks this was fun
652448
It's happened seven times:\n\n2001-02    L.A Lakers over N. J. Nets  4-0\n\n1994-95    Houston over Orlando   4-0\n\n1988-89    Detroit  over  L.A Lakers  4-0\n\n1982-83     Philly  over  L. A. Lakers  4-0\n\n1974-75    Golden State over  Washington  4-0\n\n1970-71    Milwaukee  over  Baltimore  4-0\n\n1958-59    Boston  over  Minneapolis Lakers  4-0\n\nwww.nba.com/history/finals/champions.html
32932
Jacksonville: http://www.jt-sw.com/football/pro/rosters.nsf/Annual/1996-jac\nCarolina: http://www.jt-sw.com/football/pro/rosters.nsf/Annual/1996-car\n\nDepth charts: My guess would be to look at the players and seem how many games they played. I couldn't find that anywhere.