Due to the complexity of "The man's" actions/motives, and, our lack of and knowledge and understanding, can we really justify taking action based on speculation and opinion?\n\nI mean, we think we have the facts, but, they are not all in.\n\nHow do we really know what "The Man" is up to?\n\nMaybe it is all for our own good.  Perhaps not.  Alex, you don't know, do you?!\n\nIs it really because of greed that many of the world's most powerful people seem to be acting  unconscionably?  Again Alex, you don't really know, do you?  Why did you ever sway my opinion?\n\nI do consider ALEX JONES a goof. He uses the the public to further his education. Even his purpose is unknown to himself. I think he should consider what he says and does more carefully. He is part of the problem and possibly knows it.\n\n \n\n What do you think?
217726
l have seen it ..l admire the man for his courage in talking out...
518005
How come, a person who is crying because they are scared of what might happen, are calling liberals "wussies"?  \n\nI guess this is what happens when you continue to follow STUPID!\n\nBTW. . .WWJD?\n\nFarzand A:  It is a fact that "ALL MEDIA" is biased depending on ones particular view.  Which is why everyone and anyone should seek as many different sources possible to gain information.  \n\nI check many sources (using the Internet) to see through the eyes outside of this country, as it pretty obvious that every U.S. news station will tend to protect this nation (and it is understandable).  While our constitution states we have freedom of the press, the press is free to report the news as the owners see fit.  It does not guarantee that it has to be reported straight up and with no holds barred.\n\nToday the ignorant stay ignorant by choice, however, stupidity is a Birth Right and no amount of knowledge can help them. . .In this forum it is difficult to tell the two apart, and the whole concept that a 45 is the best solution,  proves my point.
318826
Doesn't it seem as if people cling to their beleifs so hard, they will refuse to acknowledge anything that might question that? I mean, what if you found out that your Mom was a crackwhore for the first half of her life and you were the offspring of her pimp? (no offense to any mothers. This seems to be the case. besides, those 2000 year old beleifs, were the beleifs for 2000 years. This Da Vinci schmuk has just surfaced as a new beleif that can be considered by the mases. Or is it... global warming? I haven't read the book nor seen the movie, but I am familiar with the subject matter through schooling. When in school, or watching a movie that makes you think, it is enlightening. If we did not question things, there would be no need for Jesu, right? Why stop questioning now. I apologize, but it seems this Da Vinci controversy has surfaced the weakest of humans and found great fault in religion just by questioning it, whether true or not. The uproar confirms this. And for the twist... I agree with the author of this question, maybe not in the exact same sense. But I am God folks, not the one you all know, but my own. Think about this concept! What does God do for you? What is his purpose? Can these things be accomplished by yourself? It can be done.
531053
When it's "their" guy, he's a monster that we should shame.\n\nWhen it "our" guy, he's only human and we should forgive.\n\nJust how it always works, sadly.\n\nAnd John, Haggard also lied at first, said it didn't happen.  And he continues to lie when he says he hired him for a "massage" and that he threw the drugs away.\n\nTo MyEvilTwin....at what point has Rumsfeld or GW apologized or bowed out now that they have been busted for lying to the American public about invading Iraq?  See, I could care less if people lie about their sexual practices especially in the current environment.  But lying about the reasons to bomb a soverign nation that leads to the deaths of thousands of soldiers and civilians?  That I care about.\n\nWhen Clinton lied, no one died.  I know, bumper sticker but doesn't it say it so very well?
94593
I have watched this video and although it is very well put together, I do not believe any of it. Honestly people! Think about how much planning and people would have to be involved in what happened. Do you really think that in the year that Bush had been president his administration could have coordinated something like that? Considering the amount of people that would have had to have been involved, why wouldn't anyone be speaking up? Find some of these people and then maybe I'll start to consider some of these crazy ideas!
169886
Think about the ramifications of the most powerful man in the world admitting that he used poor judgement and made a mistake.  That sends a pretty clear message to all the morons out there who can't factor in human nature, who can't forgive, and who sum up a man's character not on the resume of his accomplishments but by random acts of stupidity.  Coincidentally, those morons are the ones who vote and comprise popular opinion.\n\nHe probably weighed the advantages and disadvantages of fessing up and acted accordingly.  The whole thing was embarrassing.  Other countries couldn't believe we wasted so much time and money on such a petty thing, and that our two parties would use something so anabashedly assinine to undermine one another (especially after finding how the investigation itself was corrupt).\n\nMan, thanks for bringing that up.  Now I wanna shoot myself in the face.
300922
I don't think anyone can grasp all of it. We are inandated with right wing conspiracies that want to take power and wealth from the American people.\n\nTake the oil companies for example, they own our politicians. They are the wealthiest lobby. If you were a politician, who would you listen to? The man that just paid for your children's education, or someone with just one vote?
374913
I just asked a question about the Montauk Project myself.I read the books.They seem to be very technically correct about a lot of the  things they talk about.So who-ever wrote them wasn't an idiot or a nut making up a story. I believe that the things spoken of in the stories are more than likely possible.Whether or not they actually happened as it is written,or if we really do possess this secret technoIogy, I don't know.In a way though,I kind of hope it isn't completely true,because the story of these projects are filled with abuse and inhuman treatment of human beings in the name of scientific developement and whatever else.
323095
He's the bogeyman the Bush Administration uses to keep dim-witted Americans rallying to the anti-Muslim cause. If they capture him they'll lose their best asset (and they ain't got many other assets to rely on)!\n\nOsama may exist as a man (and a bit of nutter) but can anybody out there be sure he's the evil genius the neo-cons make him out to be? Maybe America invented the persona of this monster to justify their total incompetence before, during and after 911. That goes for Al Quaida too. What is it and where is it? Quite possibly it started as a fiction in the mind of some Pentagon propagandist to justify a vicious retaliation against the Muslim World, but then it span out of control as Islamist fundamentalists realised they could adopt this media-friendly name and turn it into the monster now so feared by the US and the West.
500020
I did try to discuss this topic with "Ouzian" in IM, to no avail.  Her claims of worries that her posts will be deleted show her persistence, fortitude, and concern.  ( I commend you for these projections of qualities, but)  The obvious glaring of extreme need to spread this word, this message, is shown by her >>(assumption based on avatar), other postings regarding the same subject.  It is also very clear that what her expressions convey in regards to this matter, are sprinkled with her fears.  And I also feel that based upon her posts, her links, and her blog information, that she wishes and intends to spread these fears.  It is clear, this fear does, as she does mention, help rule, and control.  (And I do agree with this).  There are many ways to control, or govern, a mass of people, and, some of these ways to govern have proven to be effective, and some very ineffective. (In regards to the best way for ALL social situations which we as a human race on earth face today-and there are many)  But the mystery truly is not what lies beneath Ouzians belief, and its possibility of validity, not at all!  The real mystery is why then does she not wish to participate in discussions in IM, or through other modes of correspondence with others, like myself, who show EFFORT in wishes to participate, and listen, in the direct concern towards her messages of understanding or beliefs, that could possibly lead to other followers of her belief, and help her cause?   (Persistence, fortitude and concern?)  To me this lack of communication shows contradiction in motive, shows lack of intitiative, NO EFFORT, and therefore, PROVES that some great "efforts" without real ACTION, are, like time does prove some things to be, ineffective, and, it is like trying to climb to the top of a pole that is covered in grease. (wasted energy).  I have many, many opinions in regards to what is going on in the world today, and have even been very expressive of these opinions to many people, through many modes of expression, and have always welcomed any open discussion to help people see the good, and bad, in different ways of having things work, globally.  (Because obviously, some things just don't work-that pole thing again.)   At this stage of the game, the most important thing is to keep the big-picture in mind, the long-haul.  Strengths and Weaknesses,  Problems and Solutions.   So, please help me understand then, Ouzian, why do you run so very, very fast, but insist on doing so by running in place?  Ineffective.  My real question to YOUR question, since I have already answered, and I will find it fair that YOU do not breach MY allowance in expression on the matter which you brought forth, in public forum, and at hand, now being met with discussion, as you wish-is that true mystery- Why did you even bother to post this?
329454
He is a flat out liar.....\n\nhow after all this do we not assume that 9/11 was his idea to send us into a war for oil not terrorism.\n\nIt was the greatest motivator ever, we were all united like you said and maybe this was his plan all along..\n\nChaney and Haliburton to do the contracting on the oil pipeline's etc. a huge military contract $.\nAll of the other military suppliers who make money everytime we drop a bomb etc.\nThe Oil Companies, who daddy and Ben laden's family have huge monies invested and sit atop of the board of chairmen for there joint company. See Farenheit 9/11\n\nThe huge unheard of profits by exxon etc.\n\nThe whole thing reaks of a set up....\n\nMoney being the only true motivation.....\n\nJust my opinion but it seems to obvious to not be true....
672505
If you don't already know the Loose Change video that the person above posted is nothing more than a very well put together conspiracy theory set to undermine the war on terrorism, by spreading lies about our government that are completely outrageous.  \nThink of how many people it would take to organize such an act from the inside.  Only some looney tinfoil hat wearing person would believe such garbage.   \n\nread this...  and then do research of your own.  \n\nDebunking the 911 Myths \n\nhttp://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html\n\nAnd if you're against the Iraq war watch this \n\nhttp://www.iraqitruthproject.com/
252441
I've seen all the videos like this. If you honestly believe that, you have some major issues you need to work out in your life. As bad as you think our President is, you must be able to comprehend he wouldn't do that, nor would he be able to get away with it. Don't believe everything you see on the Internet. Believe it or not, some of it's not true. There's an article written by Popular Mechanics called "Debunking the 9/11 myths". This was done by people that actually know what they are talking about-not some idiot in Mommy's basement-and published by a well-respected magazine. You can decide which you're going to believe but I think I'll go with the ones who do that stuff for a living.
464863
Obviously he was a man that should have been heard. I wonder how much those he spoke to in power are being held accountable to his witness and testimony. Probably no one.\n\nHero - no, to many people misuse and abuse that word to manipulate others.\n\nDamn straight guy doing his duty and speaking the truth - you've got my vote.\n\nNow, I have to go google him to see what else he knows. Was he a prophet or an intelligence analyst???
603464
Although you asked in regards to the UK, you also just described the US.\n\nI only stopped here to ask how was your nap, Rip Van?\n\nObviously, you were sleeping while the media was co-opted.\n\nThe final proof that the media had been ultimately co-opted (for me) was when The New York Times ran parrot pieces on the Iraq War.\n\nAll hail Big Brother.  \n\nI often think to myself that when I use certain terms while using electronic mediums, that I just added to some poor low end intel data schmuck's task load.\n\nAl qaida.  Bush.  Blair.  Backpack.    \n\nThat should do it.  Now I'll be flagged for sure.\n\nI'm reminded of the George Carlin monologue about the last guy on earth. (Meaning the lowest, poorest, least, etc, not the literal last survivor.  Just this guy is so down and out nobody is worse off then he is.)  In the monologue, Carlins supposes what if the "last guy" found a dime and used it to call the FBI (or CIA)?  They'd immediately begin a file on him, because if he was the last guy, how did he get a dime...and on it goes until the guy has international intel status, well you catch the drift...)
314369
<<<<<not a  democrat/liberal... so it's impossible for me to answer the question ..since I'm simply not capable of sticking my head that far up my ass...just stopped by for a chuckle , high fives you and amyza29.... and wonders if James is becoming a stalker....lol..
76056
I've been spreading it around to as many people as possible. I believe 95% of it to be the truth. The only thing that I think they push the limits on is Marvin Bush's connection the WTC security. I dont think that has anything to do with it. But, having read the writings of Osama Bin Laden and having been very confused when the conflicting messages from him were given out, I find Loose Changes explanation much better than the governments. I remember when Bin Laden released a statement declaring his innocence, and I remember wondering what was up with that so called "confession tape". Having read his writings, he did not strike me as a flip-flopper or a liar. I dont agree with him, but he stands for what he believes in, and one of the things he makes a point of stressing is honesty.\n\nFor my part I believe George Bush and his administration are behind the 9-11 attacks.\n\n\nPeace