For example, which is correct John F. Smith, III or is it John F. Smith III?
218003
No.  Do not use a comma before “Jr.” or “III” after a person’s name.\n\nRight:\n John Smith Jr.\n \nRight:\n John Smith IV\n \nRight: Thurston Howell III
266969
Good question. The only "default" names I've known of would be John Doe or Jane Doe. I think the nurses or social workers end up coming up with the names, other than John or Jane Doe, but they're likely changed upon adoption.
662886
No, that would show possessive use.  The s after the name is just fine, and actually grammatically correct.
606469
both the spellings are correct...it basically depends from person to person...what they wanna use....so take your pick
229027
Technically, every United States President, current or not, can be addressed as "President" no "Fmr." is necessary.  However, when one speaks of "the President" that usually means the one currently in office.
625858
I know what your reffering too. Yet, how do you know the initials?
69763
What a shame. So many incorrect answers.\n\nJim and I versus Jim and Me\nFor some writers and speakers, the case of a pronoun becomes especially troublesome when that pronoun is compounded with something or someone else. When the pronoun is being used as a subject, there is usually no problem:\n\nJim and I are playing tennis this afternoon.\nJim and she are playing tennis this afternoon.\nWe learn this lesson so well — getting cuffed on the ears and being forced to stand in the corner when we say "Jim and me are playing tennis. . . " — that when the object form of the pronoun is truly called for, we're apt to come up with the subject form instead, as in "Grandma left Jim and I her rocking chair," which is bad form, indeed. \n\nThere is a simple rule here that seems to work very well, at least in writing. Ask yourself what pronoun form you would use without adding the other person — "Grandma left me her rocking chair" (coming up with the correct form for the indirect object) — and then, when you add the other person, don't change the form of the pronoun: "Grandma left Jim and me her rocking chair." \n\nThis rule works whether the pronoun is being used as an indirect object, as above, as a direct object — "The policeman stopped Jim and me" — or as the object of a preposition — "Grandma gave her rocking chair to Jim and me." Some writers and speakers will mistakenly say "This is just between Jim and I," not realizing that the preposition "between" calls for the object form of both pronouns, including "me."\n\nThe rule also pertains to sentences in which a pronoun is compounded with yet another pronoun: "Grandma gave her rocking chair to him and me, but that's just between you and me."\n\nNotice that when "I" is compounded with another subject, the "other person" or people get first billing: "Jim and I are playing," not "I and Jim." This is one of the very few polite forms in English.
180326
According to me, I feel it is something like... "John's and mine"......i would go with it.. as "Mine" is first person to indicate possession of something and that would be sufficient instead of an I's (which i feel is wrong)
183183
It is John, the author.  Since the gospel is written in the 3rd person, John cannot say "I".  Some scholars believe that John did not use his own name to remain humble.  \n\nJohn 20:2 is a good example of John calling himself "the diciple Jesus loved most"  See also, John 21:20.  \n\nThe commentary in my bible mentions that John is know as the apostle of love and that the was part of an "inner ciricle of three" witnessing the transfiguration, bring Jairus's daughter back to life and waiting in the Garden of Gethsemane, these events may have caused John to think he was loved best.  \n\nIf you are looking for a good bible to read, just for information I suggest The Message and Remix which is by Eugene Peterson, he translated the bible from its orginal Hebrew and Greek into the contempory language we use now.\n\nAlso, The Student Bible (New International Version), published by Zondervan Publishing House is good because it offers reading tips and comentary.  The references I cited in the answer were from this bible.\n\nI also enjoy "Where to Find it in the Bible"  It is "The Ultimate A to Z resource"  it is by Ken Anderson.
554282
either of them is the correct answer
233600
Put the name in quotes when you type it in.  "John Smith"
249212
Just to correct you, it's a first name that you're asking about.  Here's a Web site that has lots of examples.
454133
i knowwww! it doesn't even sound right O_o \n\nmy mistake <== atleast it's correct, grammar-wise!
323107
D.\n\nA is incorrect because it's supposed to be plural (womens')\nB is plural\nC is incorrect as "whose" is the possessive.
188028
Andrew Jackson. \n\nOur president was illiterate, and when having to sign on a bill, he would have to have someone approve it in writing for him. \n\nOne day, the person hired to do it was unavailable, and when he signed the document he wrote "OLL KORRECT" which is how he though all correct was spelled, and ever since OK has been adapted as an all correct statement.
648569
All are correct. Traditionally, 2 and 3 are correct. The word "whom" nowadays is sometimes considered dated (not used anymore, or very rarely used). "Whom" is in modern English replaced by "who". However, the word "whom" is sometimes still used in formal contexts (formal speeches, formal letters, contracts, etc).\n\nConversationally, no. 1 is used. If you use no. 2, 3 and 4 in a conversation, it will sound funny. To answer your question, no. 3 is the most grammatically correct, but not quite acceptable conversationally. You cannot use no. 4, but still can use no. 2.\n\nA lot of English speakers do not speak English properly, so you must accept the fact that although no. 1 is not 100% correct gramatically, and no. 3 is correct grammatically, no. 1 is more acceptable conversationally than no. 3.
512395
Yes, it is the correct word.  In that context, it doesn't need to be capitalized.