what is u.s vs. sharpe about when did it happen when did it end. why didi it start.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
214018
The citation for United States vs Sharpe is 470 US 675 (1985).\n\n\nHere are the facts of the case:\nArgued November 27, 1984 \nDecided March 20, 1985 \n\n\n\nA Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agent, while patrolling a highway in an area under surveillance for suspected drug trafficking, noticed an apparently overloaded pickup truck with an attached camper traveling in tandem with a Pontiac. Respondent Savage was driving the truck, and respondent Sharpe was driving the Pontiac. After following the two vehicles for about 20 miles, the agent decided to make an "investigative stop" and radioed the South Carolina State Highway Patrol for assistance. An officer responded, and he and the DEA agent continued to follow the two vehicles. When they attempted to stop the vehicles, the Pontiac pulled over to the side of the road, but the truck continued on, pursued by the state officer. After identifying himself and obtaining identification from Sharpe, the DEA agent attempted to radio the State Highway Patrol officer. The DEA agent was unable to contact the state officer to see if he had stopped the truck, so he radioed the local police for help. In the meantime, the state officer had stopped the truck, questioned Savage, and told him that he would be held until the DEA agent arrived. The agent, who had left the local police with the Pontiac, arrived at the scene approximately 15 minutes after the truck had been stopped. After confirming his suspicion that the truck was overloaded and upon smelling marihuana, the agent opened the rear of the camper without Savage's permission and observed a number of burlap-wrapped bales resembling bales of marihuana that the agent had seen in previous investigations. The agent then placed Savage under arrest and, returning to the Pontiac, also arrested Sharpe. Chemical tests later showed that the bales contained marihuana. Respondents were charged with federal drug offenses, and, after the District Court denied their motion to suppress the contraband, were convicted. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that because the investigative stops failed to meet the Fourth Amendment's requirement of brevity governing detentions on less than probable cause, the marihuana should have been suppressed as the fruit of unlawful seizures.
471820
Wow, something that Rob Roy isn't an expert on.  You are just about as dumb as string.  I guess the schools in Scotland must not cover what we call "The War of 1812,"  I don't know what the English call it.  I assume in Scotland they call it "The war in the place that we were sent to do England's bidding (again) in 1812-1814."  Your English masters did manage to burn our capitol down, but we still b1tch slapped you.  \n\nWhy do you love Belgians so much?  Why did you edit that entry?  I was going to snidely quote your derisive comment about learning history back to you.
568055
Yes, this is all just the beginning.\n\nSee if you look at the world today you will notice chain reactions happening all over the world that started on that day.  Example: the worlds distrust of the US.\n\nYes, a lot of things lead up to it, but it was the calmination of everything prior.\n\nBut don't worry just yet.  WWII started off a little skirmish it was a couple years before it became a blown out war.  The time you should worry is when another superpower enters this little skirmish or when it truelly becomes a religious war.\n\nYes, I know it seems that this is a religious war, but it's really just a political war right now.  If you noticed even on this forum it's becoming more religious every day. It still a man(Bin Lauden) using religion to do something political.  Eventually this will turn into a religious war or another World War; either way it will be the war to end all wars.
518051
It takes longer to train leaders.\n\nBTW--NBC is the only one calling it a civil war.
48237
bush has a love hate with usama... hate because he attacked us. love because he gave bush a perfect excuse to attack anybody out there that is a so called "threat", but not formidable enemies though... just weaker ones. it's just the same ole imperialistic, manifest destiny garbage
478465
Your a little off on the dates. The Whitesox hosted in 03 not 04, it was the Astros who hosted in 04. However you have found an interesting coincidence. \n\nAstros hosted in 04 and made the WS for the first time in thier history the next year (05). Whitesox hosted in 03 and in Won the WS in 05 after a long draught. Tigers hosted in 06 and lost WS in 06 after a long draught and after losing 100 games just 2 years before.
643310
Woe.....hey....why stop at WWI .....how 'bout the civil war. The revolutionary war.
593190
I think your intuitions are right about how Americans can't handle facing up to the fact the team USA really sucks.  (I mean the USA CZE match yesterday was a humiliation for all Americans)  But on the other hand, most other countries have been playing soccer for many generations more than Americans have.  The highschool I went to started their soccer program in 1992, and youth soccer in my town didn't start until 1995!  So if you look at it that way, it's amazing that the USA was able to send a team to the WM at all, and maybe in 2 or 3 more generations, they will actually be able to score a goal there.
142619
it was ozzie and roy.  vernon and roy fought too.  i remember those fights.  those were the best fights in the nhl.  i loved when roy got his a$$ kicked by ozzie.  he is not a bad fighter.  i got those classic fights on video.  they were not post- season fights . the ozzie-roy fight  occurred on march 26 1997.   it was on the same night that mccarty beat the tar outta lemieux.  the vernon-roy fight happened sometime after that.
383151
Hell to the yeah! That dude TAUGHT Brett Hart the Sharpshooter! That and back in the day he was the US Champ for like 6 months or something like that when WCW was really competative with the then WWF. He's got in and out of ring skills to sum it up. Ya gotta have both.
319832
For 2 reasons-in my opinion:  One, the number of deaths in one attack... more than Pearl Harbor.  And two, no disrespect to your possible view, but I think the US is the only country whose leaders actually DO SOMETHING when they are attacked.  Other countries complain about the US until they need help fighting someone... ironic?  SO, to answer your question, my thoughts are, my country actually doesn't sit back and wait to see what another country thinks if it is attacked.  All of Europe would be "Germany" today if this was not the case.
192920
The Germans made a deal with the Japanese that if they attacked America then they (the Germans) would help the Japanese fight against the U.S. This did not happen.The Germans wanted the Japanese to keep the U.S. busy while the Germans did there thing. America had a deal with Great Britain that the U.S. would send equipment and supplies to help in the war. It was called "lend and lease". This would help the war effort and keep the Americans from the fighting. This was working to some point until the raid on Pearl harbor. There is speculation that the Brits knew of the attack on pearl but didn't say anything because they wanted the U.S. to join the war. There were a few stipulations G.B. had to agree to for the U.S. to officially join in the war effort. The most important was that G.B.(great Britain) would have to remove it's self from ALL of it's colonies. such as India and others.
95261
As of 3/16/06 one can only guess,but I think it will never happen , number one. those people over there have been fighting with each other for years and have no idea how to get along with each other. Number 2. Things over there is not getting any better and civil war is knocking at the back door.Our young men and women are fighting a lost battle ,if by the Grace of God we do get out of there within the next 10 years they we be right back where they were when we invaded. And as far as the Administration, I think we should send a few of them over there or perhaps their family members.And to the young writers who thing the war is over...perhaps you would like to talk to some of the honest hard working young men and women over there...I know because I have a nephew ,brother and friends over there fighting everyday. Along with that, I have a son who got back last year from being blowed up, so why didn't anyone tell him the war was over!!!! Wake up people, if you think it's over I heard that the military is in need of men and women to pick daisy in Iraq.
332327
The thing of being a super power after the second world war kinda got to americas head. Now japan rules it has the power and tech. to take on america but it dosent show off like america. America just pokes its nose in other poeples business they just wanna show that still are in power but reality check. they aint!   like for instance the time when tensions grew between india and pakistan.USA barged in and told they wont let a war take happen they just want a piece of the action, what happened then india told them to back off this is our issue and we will resolve it.
674495
The American Revolution was long, slow and hard, for both\nsides.  But now we have freedoms, that were not imagined\n4 or 5 hundred years ago.  50 or 100 years from now the\nIraqis will look back on this period with great gratitude.  And so\nwill the rest of the world.\nI Corinthians 13;8a, Love never fails!!!
132754
From 28 September 1781 to 19 October 1781\n\nSiege began on 30 September.  Artillery bombardment began on 9 October.  Advance of French and American forces made the British position unsustainable on 14 October.  The English tried a counter-attack and an escape on 16 October.  The English army surrendered on 19 October.  This was the end of fighting in the American War of Independence.
16054
Well, winning World War II set the United States up to be a world power.  It also helped ushered in a great deal of long-overdue reforms in Europe, and today a European Federal Constitution is now a very real possibility.  Further still,  had Hitler succeeded, he would have undoubetly gone on to destroy the United States indescriminatently.  He would not have spared a single American, even those who resembled his ideal race, because they had grown up in a culture that was, in his eyes, dirty and corrupt (not to mention we were his sworn enemy).  This is one of the many instances in which money plays no role, so the 2.6 trillion figure you site is meaningless.  And even though the use of atomic weapons is still controversial, that alone does not aide your case 'was stopping _Hitler_ worth it.  I'm frankly shocked and appauled that someone could use their freedom of speech, something that wouldn't be enjoyed in a Hilter-ized America, in such a blatantly ridiculous manner.