Any great war leaders of the last 10000 years of any country.
207224
what makes anyone think that aliens would want to invade  our world. maybe they want to share with us how to live in an advanced and maybe peaceful world. not that we would know anything about that, and we are so ignorant to them helping us that we would probably nuke them. and no great leader would be able to defeat an alien invasion, they have more pwerful weapons than us. if they are advanced enough to have ships to travel to other worlds then they can defeat any army in this world.
449840
They serve until their term is over. If they served until the war was over every President would start a war near the end of their term.
338515
They beat the English in 1066 in the battle of Hastings but no i don't think they have won a war since,they are wimps and it's a well known fact because they left the British to fight on their own in both world wars.The only good leader the French have had is Napoleon who was the Emperor of France and they did hardly anything in the second world war compared to Britain and America.They also lost the 100 year war with England(and Wales because Wales was the first country England took over to make the UK)and it just goes to show that France are rubbish and are not brave at all.
511631
Perhaps as ancient countries they have become older and wiser over the years
282054
Try this link it lists, inventions from 2000 onwards, pick off the list, as for the important people, try looking at presidents, prime ministers, sports people who have been prominent in last 6 years, try searching Yahoo news.
32646
When Iran and Iraq had been fighting for 9 or 10 years, who was right and who was wrong?\n\nYou have to wait to see what history says.
459441
Sure, and people used to live for over 900 years. Makes perfect sense. NOT!
284450
I think World leader should lead troops into battle. If not at least go to the warzone ONCE and go out of your fortress alittle bit to what you created (In Bush's case) The Mess
246686
I think the longest serving President/Ruler living is Fidel Castro in Cuba.
159542
George Bush\nAdolf Hitler\nGeorge Bush Daddy\nGeorge Bush Daddy Daddy
515173
Propaganda was a good weapon in the past.  I think in 100 years there will be genetic weapons that a leader will be able to wipe out a whole race of people.  Scary.
1374
Around 600,000 years old. Maybe even older.
440217
Well one thing for sure they aren't History majors or economists. No country has held any standard of living for long by laying that heavy a burden on their economy. The lefts pipe dreams have been tried over and over again through history yet why they don't look at these as case studies and learn is beyond me.
467
World Rulers: Heads of State and Prime Ministers -\nOn this pages you will find all Heads of State and Chiefs of Government of the countries of the world\nhttp://www.info-regenten.de/regent/regent-e/\n\nThis site contains lists of heads of state and heads of government (and, in certain cases, de facto leaders not occupying either of those formal positions) of all countries and territories, going back to about 1700 in most cases\nhttp://rulers.org/
195123
The answer is NO for historical reasons. It is not like women were never leaders before.\n\nEvery time in history when a Woman was elevated to as status of Ruler of Nation she behaved in exactly the same way -- a man would! \nMeaning, she ruled as she so fit -- she was nice sometimes and was ruthless when the circumstances were right.\n\nConsider: \nElizabeth I of England sponsored pirates to terrorize ships of other nations(Francis Drake) and started Anglo-Spanish War. \n\nGolda Meir of Israel authorized the Mossad to kill Black September in retaliation of 1972 Olympics massacre. She also  showed ruthlessness in conducting the Yom Kippur war.\n\nCatherine II of Russia initiated numerous Russo-Turkish Wars and annexed Crimea. \n\nMore recently Margaret Thatcher was known as "Iron Lady." She also  "punished" the unionists which led to Anglo-Irish War.\n\nSo women have demonstrated ability to be as violent and tyrannical as men -- so giving them the rule will not really change much-- ther would still be wars murder and destruction.
403689
Provided help. Maybe.\n\nBut that's after conquering, oppessing and enslaving the populations for centuries. Just because Wales, Scotland and Ireland eventually lost to the conquerors....\n\nAnyway, some people have long memories, and look at all that has happened, not just what happened recently. \n\nIt's the same with any group that has rivalries and conflict going back centuries. Some won't let go of the past, and some will.
286963
Iraq was 200 years back to start with so if they are back 50 now then thats not so bad. Next time you see some of what you call cowards then pick up your rifle.