What does the "i.e." mean?
211285
i.e. is Latin for "id est," meaning that is.\n\nIt's *not* used to give an example.  It's used to rephrase something.  An example is e.g., which is exempli gratia in Latin.
4663
"When you mean 'for example,' use e.g. It is an abbreviation for the Latin phrase exempli gratia. When you mean 'that is,' use 'i.e.' It is an abbreviation for the Latin phrase id est. Either can be used to clarify a preceding statement, the first by example, the second by restating the idea more clearly or expanding upon it. Because these uses are so similar, the two abbreviations are easily confused. If you just stick with good old English 'for example' and 'that is' you won’t give anyone a chance to sneer at you. If you insist on using the abbreviation, perhaps 'example given' will remind you to use 'e.g.,' while 'in effect' suggests 'I.E.'\n\n"Since e.g. indicates a partial list, it is redundant to add 'etc.' at the end of a list introduced by this abbreviation."\n- Paul Brians\n\nThis is also in Paul Brians' book "Common Errors in English Usage," which I highly recommend.
94663
A) Antecedent (also called referent)
104168
Well I think its pretty self-explanatory. It says A equals to something, so I would go with A.
666310
It means "if they can" or "if s/he can" or "if one can" and it's like saying "if it's possible"\n\n\nI see the other two posts after mine. "Si" can mean either "yes" or "if" depending upon whether the i has an accent mark or not. Without an accent mark, it means "if" and with an accent mark it means "yes"
375986
The "ee" sound at the end is a diminutive. Diminutives are common in many different languages, so it was apparently developed early in the evolution of language.\n\nIn English, diminutives include words ending in -ey/-ie/-y, such as dearie, doggy, kitty, cookie, or any number of similar words. Such an ending slightly alters the meaning, generally to refer to something a little smaller in size. It may show that you like that thing.\n\nThere are diminutives in lots of other languages, too. In French, they use the ending "-ette", which carries over to English as well. In Scottish, diminutives are used much more frequently than in English, with the ending "-ie".
73900
Is that an L or an I?  Might be Ibis.
232653
There is only 1 "e" in that entire Question.
438541
I think you'd have to put it in context to get a decent answer (at least from someone who hasn't read the article to which you refer).  It could mean any number of things depending on the sentences that preceded or followed it.
553205
lol I dont think it matters. They are commonly used phrases in society and I dont take them literally. When I say such things, it is not premeditated, they just come out.so there is no real meaning behind them. Im not actually talking to a god or damning something to that non existent place at all.
609775
~I.  Informed\nII.  Ignorant\n\nDo try to use an informed one.\nDon't pay attention to the ignorant one.\n\nWhat the hell kind of question is this?
183653
The first means something like "woah."\n\nCheck out the following link, which provides a helpful little cheatsheet.
472648
E as in Ian?\nlol find out so much on ere lol lol
255303
I don't think it refers to it being common... instead I think that it refers to like everyday (common) as in you do it often or commonly.  So it means like "everyday sense".  I agree with you however that people don't use it, but it is not common because it does not really mean "common sense"
475724
i think it means 'within' but im not sure
200659
c.\n\nHe would come first. It always works that way. It's common courtesy. And then, you wouldn't say "would you like to come with I?" Imagine that you were the only one for a second. then ask if it should be me or I. It will be the same answer with someone else coming, too.\n\nI hope this helps you out.
251956
It is assuming the existing part.\n\nit's like the famous "I think therefore I am"\nThat actually is a horrible place to start because it assumes the 'I'.\nA better start is "Thought exists" then work your way to the I.\nSo saying that existing god exists, is like saying the blue bird is blue.  You can't make the verb exists into an adjective, existing, and think it doesn't need to be justified.