Did you know that if you type in "failure" on Google, Bush's bio comes up, and if you type in "pathetic failure" he's on the first link? Sad... but it makes a lot of sense!
208855
Well, not really. (making alot of sense) There's a way to link someone's website to certain search words by somehow putting the term on it and then hoarding it with links to that term. Google works by how many links your website takes hits on and that determines how high up on the search you come. It really isn't a coincidence.
71756
Have you noticed every day on the news, headline is Bush DEFENDS this decision, Bush DEFENDS that decision, I am wondering the same thing. His approval rating is down to a point that he should take notice that he is not representing the majority of American people. Some of his decisions may even be dangerous to the American people. Examples are the ports deal and now that nuclear deal with India. To me the way it has been going lately I will breathe a sigh of relief when his term is over.
44785
Wow wishing death on bush..reminds me of someone I once knew...anyways...so long as it isn't teddythekillerhiccup or hermankerrymunster...but anyways, I suppose he might be fine...middle of the road type...but I really don't know all that much about him...I guess I don't care.
583744
Come on, smarten up!\nA gazillionare hires someone else to do the grunt work.\nHe only reads a few finalists.
580357
did the people who responded to this even read it??? haha\n\ni think it's hilarious...and so sad, yet so true.\n\ncheers!
614845
The truth is sometimes ugly & painful, eh, libs?  Not one intelligent rebuttle from any libs.  Emotions will never win over logic ( that's why Captian Kirk had Spock!)  For all the liberals with amnesia - During the 2004 Presidential State of the Union speech - I clearly remember Bush stating that Iraq, Iran & North Korea were the axis of evil and that countries that harbor terrorist would beheld accountable.  Have we forgotten that specch libs?
479876
Thank you for posting them. Very informative.  Bush must do more of this.\n\nDon't expect the mainstream media to do any positive reporting.
15953
I'm going to have to quote Sherasi here (you wrapped this up perfectly): Personally, I neither hate or love President Bush. He has been an adequate president doing nothing outstanding or terrible in either direction.  (Now here's my part).  As for the WMD's it is possible that they haven't been found.  However, and I don't think I'm speaking alone when I say this, given the tone of the Administration, the UN speech by Colin Powel and George Bush's own firey speeches, I was under the impression that the WMD posed a clear and present danger to us our or our friends in Europe (them being closer, it would be easier to get a missle there).  Therefore, even though I wasn't an avid war supporter, I did expect there to be some sort of major find (again, just because of the tone).  After these years, though it is possible that they are well hidden, the United States has sent top experts of our own (so the crack towards the UN in an earlier answer was pointless), along with spy planes, ground-penetrating radar and computer logistics simulations that could track the likely path of any movement.  I believe the weapons did exist, at one time, but were destroyed or moved.  The fact that the supposed weapons haven't been found then should NOT be seen as a 'victory' for Democrats or a 'defeat' to Republicans.  It should, if we go on the premise that Bush was telling the truh, be a cause of great alarm:  Where are these weapons? Could enemies be plotting against us right now?  It is very sad (and alarming) how even something as overtly destructive as biotoxins suddenly becomes political in this toxic political atmosphere.  And to address you additional comment, if the weapons are one day found, I would hope that the 'Bush haters' say "It looks like we made a mistake".  However, you and I and everyone here knows d*mn well that we're not that forgiving in America, and that - unfortunately - is the reason many foreign policy blunders (and that's aimed at all Presidents, not just Bush) go not only unapologized for, but are compensated by compoundingly disastrous steps.
282868
....Hmmm...Interesting.  What did you google?...How to kill the President?   \n\nThanks for showing me that, because now I can move foward with my plan!!  BWHAAAAAAA!  ;)
29604
The reason is that the Australian site has many backlinks with "space between" as the anchor text for the links. For example:\n\nhttp://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,65248,00.html\nhttp://layersofmeaning.org/archives/cat_textile_fiber_art.html\nhttp://www.purselipsquarejaw.org/2003_08_01_blogger_archives.php\nhttp://www.styleborg.com/archives/conferences/\n\nAnd many more...\n\nWhen there are a large number of links with the same anchor text they can produce unusual results. For example search for "miserable failure" (without the quotes even) and number one is the biography of George W. Bush on the Whitehouse website. The words "Miserable failure" do not appear anywhere on the page or in the metas. There are however hundreds of links to the page with "miserable failure" as the anchor text. This btw is called "Google Bombing" and is similar to the effect that you are observing, except in your case it is unintentional.\n\nFor the importance of anchor text see http://www.seo-blog.com/inbound-links.php\n\nHope that helps.
517558
Did Alex B GED just claim that the GOP "solved a genocide" in Iraq in his post? I think the phrase is "created a genocide". Iraq officials now claim 150,000 Iraqis have been killed by insurgents. Gosh, the Iraqis must be SO thankful we are there!
78319
Depending on how the sentence is arranged it could well be true. Bear with me. Suppose I take the last two words, "work seekers," as the definition of the population to be "analyzed." \n\nWould you be totally shocked to learn that only 6% of job seekers approve of Bush? (I'm thinking a lot of folks looking for jobs hold any current administration in lower regard than the part of the population who isn't looking for a job. And even that group only gives him an approval rating of less than 40%. )\n\nIt's true I would expect the unemployment rate to be higher than 38% for work seekers. After all, one assumes a work seeker doesn't have a job. That assumption, however, could be mistaken. Many people could be looking for second jobs.\n\nAnd if that's not what you meant, then Mike Gilbert is right.
603052
I feel your pain.  I keep trying to explain to my Japanese friends that not all Americans are as stupid, corrupt, and generally incompetent as the Bush administration.  Although, I still can't figure out why the American people voted him in, TWICE!!  I really just want to pull all my hair out when I think about it.  By the end of these eight devastating years, I'll probably be bald.
44590
I think - Google puts up its results based on a "Page Ranking" system. Hence, there are more websites that associate failure with GWB, than failure with NE OTHER THING. \nMy guess, its the pagerank that is causing the failure to point to GWB bio.
429854
It's hilarious.  Even if you accept his jibe at the pres it's still funny.  Bush was accepted into grad school at Harvard.  Kerry couldn't quite make the Harvard/Yale cut.  He had to go to law school at Boston College since his grades were not quite up to snuff.
140664
:}\nGreat insight and comparison\nresearch is very poor he used evidence that has long since been proved sham\ngood work!
444639
I'm getting chummy with the Ken Lay is still alive one.  9/11--there are so many that seem plausible, some not so.  I have been entertaining my theory too (btw, thanks for asking):  the cheney shooting--I wonder if the old buddy of his that got "peppered" was not the only victim.  I'm just asking.  There are probably websites already dedicated to that one--about cheney killing someone "by accident".   I feel better-thanks.