Someone famous or a loved one who has passed on.  Who would you choose if you could only choose one person.
213012
wow, loaded question\n\nprobably my dad.  I had a vision of him entering heaven exactly 2 weeks before he unexpectantly passed away.  \n\nMy dad would appreciate heaven because he accepted Jesus just weeks before he passed on.  I would want to know how awesome it is up there!
252268
Optimally, neither.  But if I were forced to choose, I'd pick the one who loved me.  I'd be less likely to be taken advantage of.
611507
How about Marilyn Monroe, or Clark Gable...Vivan Leigh maybe. JOHN LENNON...that would be a cool one.
6284
your great-great-great-great grandfather.  because he is dead
329595
I would give virtually anything to see my father again. He died many years ago, and I never got to say goodbye. :(
419987
Definitely the Undertaker because i want and inside story about the dead man
92256
Bruce Lee.\n\nActually Ali, since Bruce is dead.
295674
i would bring my grandma and/or my uncle, they both died for cancer, they were the best persons i have ever meet, and since both die, i have the question why good people always have to go and leave us here alone.
124636
neither - i would find someone that i loved and who loved me.\neasy really.
282696
Well, er uh let me think... I'd imagine seeing as they're kinda, sorta, somewhat both the same, AND either way I'm still gonna be dead afterwards.... I'll go with er, um, gee, o.k., you go ahead and pick one for me. Like I said they're both the same and both gonna hurt like hellooooooooooowwww!!!!
203969
Marilyn Monroe-Want to know how she really died.\nBill Clinton-He fascinates me.\nHenry David Thoreau-Share his values\nRalph Waldo Emerson-same as with Thoreau\nmy mom
313390
It would greatly depend on which relative it was.\nI would pick my relative simply because family is forever, friends and spouses come and go, but relatives are forever.\nHowever, it would also largely depend on what the others had to lose.  For instance, if I knew my best friend had five kids at home that would be orphaned, whereas some family member who had no children at home, it might tilt the judgment.  \nIt would also come down to who was the easiest to get?  If there was a possibility of having more time to come for the others if the other person was saved first, then I would probably make my decision that way.\nThe problem with this is question is that it asks the impossible in two ways.  First, it asks you to choose between forms of love (family, spousal, platonic) and organize them into a hierarchy.  Secondly, the question leaves out lots of specifics that would make the decision easier (see above for just a few).
376662
The cardinal. \nBecame so in 1943.\nPeople's choice.
310917
My dad died when I was four. I have always wanted to know him. It would be like finding out about myself. I would ask him if he missed me. I would want to know his philosophy of life. I would love to just to sit and talk with him for hours. I know my dad loved to eat, so we could go eat and shoot the breeze.\nI would introduce him to my husband. I'm also going to be a momma soon. I would want him to meet his grandchild.
567745
pick 1 of the few choices
282670
nelson mandela.\npossibly Stanley 'Tookie' Williams
356147
Having respect for people that we love. Also respect for people that can not protect themselves. How would you feel if someone close to you had passed and their remains not respected? I'm sure you would be concerned as well. Are you aware that in a mortuary that from beginning to end the up most respect is used for the deceased?