The name of the twelve apostles are this, The first Simon, who is called Peter and Andrew his brother, James the son of Zebedee and John his brother.( if you can give the others apostles I thank you. )
199845
Hi there,\n\nThe apostles are listed in Matthew 10:2 "These are the names of the twelve apostles: first, Simon (who is called Peter) and his brother Andrew; James son of Zebedee, and his brother John; Philip and Bartholomew; Thomas and Matthew the tax collector; James son of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus; Simon the Zealot and Judas Iscariot, who betrayed him."\n\nJudas Iscariot is replaced by Matthias in Acts 1:23-26.\n\nMark is understood to be the sidekick or secretary of Peter. This is why his Gospel is included, as it contains information of an eyewitness (Peter), even though the author themselves may not have been one of the twelve. This however, does not mean they were not necessarily there.\n\nLuke makes it known that his account is compiled from an investigation of the events. (Luke 1:1-4)\n\nLuke is also the author of the book of Acts (or The Acts of the Apostles). Although written mainly in the third person, Luke makes it known that we was present at the events starting from Luke 16:10 by using the word "we" instead of "they".\n\nAs a bit of trivia, Luke appears to have written Luke and Acts as one volume, to the same audience, a person referred to as Theophilus (Luke 1:1, Acts 1:1).
6013
"What is the fifth son's name." isn't a question.  It's a statement telling us that the fifth son's name is "What".\n\n(**  )<|\nDead Fish\nOllec, the Fish Slayer
86402
Peter mean rock... but that's the only one I know.  Go online and look up name meanings.  Like there are baby naming websites that have the meanings of names.  So just go there and look up the names of the Apostles.
666322
They were Jews. The term Christians didn't come about until the pagans in the city of Antioch coined it as a derogatory term for those religious people who acted like they were "little Christs" which is the meaning of that term.\n\n"So Barnabas went to Tarsus to look for Saul, and when he had found him, he brought him to Antioch. For a whole year they met with the church and taught a great many people. And in Antioch the disciples were first called Christians.  Acts 11:25-26
155255
John 3:16\n\nRomans 10:9-10;13\n\n2 Peter 3:9\n\nMatthew 18:11\n\nJust to name a few. . . .
16204
Jesus name.  Read Acts 2:38!
600380
hahahha.  That will preach.  NOT\n\nDidn't this already happen?  snake handlers...  blah blah...\n\nWHO WAS JESUS TALKING TO?  HELLOOOOOOOO?\n\nJESUS GAVE THAT POWER TO WHO?  Not CHristians  He gave it too the Apostles.\n\n THE APOSTLES GAVE IT TOO...NOBODY.  That ended with the Last apostle.\n\nAny Christian that claims to have the power of a apostle, We can see.  A apostle had the power to raise the dead.\n We can go to a cemetary and, you raise the first one from the grave....I'll raise the second one.
315408
We all have our Friends, then our close Friends, then our best Friends, and finally our best friend. Jesus was the same, he had His followers, His disciples, Peter, James and John, and His best friend was Peter. \nPeter seamed to be the smartest and most inquisitive among the disciples, which usually makes one a leader among their peers.\nPeter had the strongest faith and acted on that faith.
17440
This is a poorly worded question. You assume the answer. You assume that someone or something named god "creat the world" and that man just appeared. \n\nSecond you've already given your answer that the first person's name is jesus. This doesn't agree with the stories in your bible.\n\nAnd while you are at it, read it and maybe you'll understand why god creat the world. It says so in your bible. That is one of many bibles, by the way.\n\nBut of course, this is just one story. There are many creation stories from many different religions.
306991
The Gospels were written my early Christian anonymous authors.  Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were not authors but were used as a thematic reference to each version of the story.  There were hundreds of "Gospels" that did not make it into the Canon we call the New Testament.
172166
All the apostles were Jewish too – are you suggesting that in order to be a priest that a person must also be Jewish?\n\nWhat about middle eastern – all the Apostles were middle Eastern.\n\nFrom non-broken homes...\n\nHow much further should I go?\n\nHow many rules do you want to impose?  How about you live by Gospel instead of law?
357492
peter was upside down on the cross. and it was in rome.\nthe word babylon is your past.and it doesn't say who was killed first peter or paul.
589268
Pope Benedict the XVI makes the 266th Pope. Here are the names:  http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12272b.htm\n\nThe answer to how the first Pope came to be can be complex, if only because it is disagreed upon by those outside the Catholic Church.\n\nAs you will notice the first Pope on the list in the link above is St. Peter. This is Peter the Apostle from the Gospel and an author of epistles. I will provide a fuller link below, but here is the short of it.  Peter was considered in Scripture to be the head Apostle since he appears more often, is on every listing of the Apostles first, and had many unique experiences with Christ. Namely, one is Matt 16 especially verse 18. This verse was not contested for over a thousand years until the Eastern Catholic Church broke away and no longer accepted the Papacy. The Catholic Church from the beginning interpreted the verse to mean Christ's Church would be built on Peter, whose name means Rock. Furthermore, it was only Peter who received the unique gifts of the keys which are spoken about in that chapter. There are a couple other instances unique to the position that Christ called Peter to, which are listed in this next link along with the unanimous agreement among the early Church Fathers which prove the authenticity of the history of the Pope as the Catholic Church describes it.\nhttp://www.catholic.com/library/Origins_of_Peter_as_Pope.asp\n\nGood question. Very heavily debated since those outside the Church are taught to be reactive to the very word 'Pope.' I encourage you to read some of the other articles detailing the Pope on that 2nd website. The first one is tougher to understand.\n\nIf you have any more questions please add some details to this post and I will try to return to it later if necessary.\n\nThanks and God Bless.\n\nps. I just saw your additional inquiries. Perhaps this will help you. It is comprehensive in a lot of ways. But is a great read. What I encourage is for you to understand just what the Catholic Church says about the Pope. You are always welcome to view the opposition's argument, but often enough there are people that do not learn about the Catholic Church from the Catholic Church. And they learn things that aren't true or are distortions to bolster an agenda. Good luck in your search.\n\nhttp://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12260a.htm
219383
Yes and more than just James the most famous who most likely was the author of the book of James. Below is a conversation between Jesus and His brothers.\nIf you are referring to James Simon and Judas they were His disciples not brothers. This is a different James than His brother. Also there were 2 named Judas but neither were His brothers. Simon was renamed Peter by Jesus.
481179
There were not last names then.  Christ is a title, but people then were identified by where they were from thus- Jesus of Nazareth
474250
The angel Gabriel. see Luke 1: 31. \n\nIn Matthew chapter 1, an angel appears to Joseph in a dream and tells him that the child's name will be Jesus.\n\nSo both Mary and Joseph, independently, were instructed as to the naming of the child.\n\nain't that neat?\n\ngod bless!!
13368
I am not sure if he was, but our current bible is missing several books.  Each of the 11 disciples wrote a book (all but Judas), but we only have 4.  Also, bear in mind that the Catholic Bible and Protestant Bible have different books.  However, although I am sure he probably wrote "something" about Christ, I can not say for sure it was a "book," and that his book was rejected.