If he 'accidentally' shoots anyone else, would Mr. Cheney be considered a terrorist? Would that make Haliburton guilty of aiding terrorism?
200597
He is second terriost to you. I bet he is shocking and awing your wife right now.
330837
There is a principle by all opressive rulers (such as ours) it goes- the crimes they do matter, the crimes we do are ignored.  Some people call this a double-standard, but in fact it is a single standard used by all opressive regimes.  So regardless of whether or on Osama (who, by the way didn't even know 9-11 happened, he indirectly funded it supposedly) is as murderous as Bush... of course on every level of measurement Bush is worse, but in the US we cannot be objective and are forces to give in to blind flag-waving patriotism and think that we are innocents when in fact we are the most aggresive, out of control state on the globe.
222094
I know exactly who you are talking about..the guy was living near my home town.  He never really got shot, He faked it all because enough people were calling him out on his hatred and disregard for our military's members' lives.  Unfortunately, I no longer have that link because it disgusted me so much.
35602
I think if it hadn't been for Cheney the V.P, he would have sued the **** out of the person who shot him.  The fact that he didn't sue Cheney doesn't necessarily mean that he's an incompetent lawyer.  Probably he was paid off on the side...or given some lifelong benefit that discouraged the lawyer from sueing.
348307
Are you kidding? If he showed up in Iraq they'd probably boo him off the stage, and thats if someone didn't take a pot shot at him.\n\nEvery single soldier, sailor, airman and marine know that something is fishy about a guy who showed up in Vietnam for 3 months, got 3 purple hearts for wounds but never missed a day of duty, and won't release the relevant parts of his medical records that say what injuries he received.
186969
I think that Dick (dead eye) Cheneys role in Halliburtons getting no bid contracts ought to be invesigated
535709
Maybe, but not really because he is a muslim, but because he is a liberal.  And he's not just a liberal, hes a LIBERAL, big time.  I've researched him.  He's very leftists, so I do think he'll try to appease the islamic countries, and if he must use his religion to gain those means, I don't see that stopping him.  However, he's just one Representative.  In most likelyhood he wont affect foreign affairs whatsoever, and instead just get alot of pork (no pun intended, I swear) for his district like every other Representative tries to do
392160
Iraq-didnt the Dems vote for it too and proudly, especially Kerry.  This is a stupid question.  Is there a law to prevent a lying, soldier-bashing person from running from pres?  no.   Why would Dems want to impeach Bush?  Do like Cheney that much-ha.
254732
There is no such thing as a "civilian Al Queda". Anyone who proudly identifies themself as a member of an organization whose mission is to take over the world with brute force and terror, is an enemy of all humans. If I thought I had Bin Laden in the crosshairs of a Hellfire missile, I would launch. It would be nice to capture him alive, but dead is good, too.
337213
The whole speech was a metaphorical comparison of the "cold war" to Bush's "war on terror".  His point was that by America's being able to claim victory in the cold war Truman was vindicated, and by extension his "war on terror" would be vindicated by its eventual success.  However, that is probably unlikely, whoever gets elected Dem. or Rep. is probably going to drop Iraq like a hot potato (with no e).  So, its just Bush trying to make himself feel better because he knows he isn't really popular in the polls.  Whether he really has oil interests in the region or represents them is another question entirely, and one I personally cannot answer with any definitive evidence either way, but then, Cheney does have well known ties to Haliburton.
306618
That's wrong..Yall need to give that man some air. He has more to do in his BS life then you would know what to do with. Any how his Sec of Defence is the one killing because he is the adviser of the pres. in war. I don't care if anyone is offened or any thing else.
512998
I think this happened in the first presidential elections?\nOne problem with this idea would be a lack of continuity.  Say a republican president dies and on the same day a democrat takes over with extremely different views on foreign policy, the military, homeland security, and social structure within the country (sometimes the difference is not that great, but it could be) - it would really go for a radical break from what people voted for in a president.  I realize they would have voted for the VP too, but it wouldn't normally have been with the thought in mind that he was likely to become president.\nThen another problem:  Could it encourage political extremists to assassinate a president in order to further their own political agenda?  Right now it would not be worth it.  For instance, who would want to assassinate Bush, and have Cheney for president?  Not likely.
213791
YES.  A gentleman would never do those things.  \n\nThey should have said "The man shot 4 people...."  Oh, and of course nowadays we have to add the word "allegedly"....<rolleyes>
413775
Kissinger was one ,or I should saw is one of the worst scumbags going. There is so much I can only suggest reading " The Trial of Henry Kissinger" by Chris Hitchings. I would say the man should be declared an enemy of the USA. He is also guilty of Crimes Against Humanity. It's because of ppl like him, that the US will not recognize "The World Court, for Crimes against Humanity.
202530
i agree with you too, we deserve someone better than bush. And plus, cheney is just shooting people and saying its an accident, you know we deserve someone better than that!
422527
Hey hey LBJ,  how many kids did you kill today?  It sounds like the same people running this one ran Vietnam.  Bush is not there to prevent disorder,but to  preserve it.  All so the plunder can continue while our military are security police for Halliburton and whatever other agents are there carrying out the plunder.  And don't forget we threw Afghanistan in as well.  Tell it like it is.  It does not exceed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but it is right up there on the scaremeter.  Well done!
46025
Sounds very negligent to me, despite attempts to whitewash the incident among friends.  Still and all, even were the friends not the VP, probably no charges would be filed, and no lawsuit. (Esp. since Cheney provided immediate medical help.)