witch one is the real one plz no one take this efencivly i am just confused
209666
If you count all the different translations to different languages there are a lot more. :-)\n\nBasically, the original text is in ancient hebrew or greek.  Translating from one language to another is very hard -- in fact there is no translation without interpretation. There are idioms (sayings) in any language that don't translate.  If someone called you a cabbage in French, it would be sweet and endearing.  In English it's just rude.  Then consider translating from one time to another.  The world is different, and English has changed from the time of King James to now, and sometimes the words don't carry.  For instance the word "suffer" used to mean "allow" so when Christ said "Suffer the little children to come unto me" in KJV, he wasn't suggesting that the kiddies be hurt.\n\nSo, in interpretation one can either be "literal" or "meaning preserving" or somewhere in between.  If somone asked Jesus when evil could be done in heaven and he said "when pigs fly" (I am just making this part up) then one interpreter could say "on the day that pigs fly in the sky" and the other could say "that would neve happen!".   Two interpretations, both correct.  This provides some of the division.  NAS is more literal, NIV is more meaning-preserving. \n\nOkay, to make it a little harder: when the early translations by Tyndale and the like were made, they only had a limited set of ancient copies to work from.  Since then, there have been more found, and older ones.  When you look at a modern translation (CEV, NAS, NIV) they are based on a wider collection of older manuscripts.  That probably means that they're more accurate.\n\nThen finally there are paraphrases like the Living Bible or the Amplified Bible, which are not translations from original manuscripts but a retelling of an existing translation in modern english, perhaps with more text added to get the point across better.\n\nSo the answer is to read a few of them.  It's a perfectly acceptable thing to get a paraphrase or a very modern easy-to-read translation (The Message, The Living Bible, etc) for your first read-through so that you become familiar with the overarching story line and the characters. You might like to get a chronological bible which orders the books in timeline order (most Bibles are ordered by category like law, history, wisdom, prophesy, life of Christ, early Christian church history, and then letters from disciples).  A chronological bible would help you see the story as it unfolded.\n\nThen, if you like, get a parallel bible so that you can see two, three, or four translations side-by-side and compare them. \n\nOn one hand, the real bible would be the original manuscripts or their most faithful reproductions in Hebrew or Greek.  \n\nBut if you are willing to look at it this way, the REAL bible is the events that happened, not any one recording of them by a particular author. If you see it this way, then reading any of them, or (better) several of them is the way to get the REAL bible. \n\nBut equally important are some small little tidbits: If one wants to know God then one must first believe that He exists, and secondly that He rewards those who honestly seek Him.  Secondly, that his word is never wasted.\n\nI hope this helps you.
96150
U r confusious. Be cool. silently read the manual pages.
160188
I dont understand this question, it makes no sense at all
311001
nope, there is no such thing as the one.  infact, there is no matrix.  the truth is, its all a conspiracy.  the real world is known to very few as, Diffusion Wave-Nation
33691
i dont know...ive never tried that one b4 lol
550374
Only one man has understood me,and even he has not  =  even if this one man said/showed that he understood me or agreed with me, he did not really fully understand my motives/hidden thoughts etc. In other words, I am too abstract for you pragmatic simpletons to understand me (but I am trying to say that nicely).\n \nthe real is rational and the rational is real  =  a thing can only be real if it is rational, and it is only rational if it is real. If it is real, then it must be rational and if it is rational, then it surely is real. It means the two are synonims, or they define each-other.
320059
this is a confusing question...humph..
227416
you hit the nail on this one. Both are fake!!
343066
you need to ask yourself, "who is really one up?"\nis it him for cheating, or you for being the mature one at the time and forgiving him?\n\nThink of it in a different way.  I'm sure you'll see who is really "one-up"
542154
It's real but don't know how and if they work.
313622
?!? that cant be real. it has to be fake shit
527931
Its fake!!!!!\n\nThere is no password. The program is spyware and should not be installed.\n\nThere is nothing in the file.
587096
see link below.. if the name isnt there.. im not sure what to tell.
176834
i think u have to compare the theoretical head (in the graph included with pumps) with the real one
355808
Hi \n\nU r not confused, u r confusing us by put different questions.  in the same name. please go through yr questions.
253279
There is only one Christ Jesus.  \n\nWhen He comes again, and if you are still alive, you will recognise it.  You will know and you don't even need to doubt.  Because it is going to be so awesome.\n\nHis awesome return is the difference between the real and the fake.  A phenomenon men never experienced.\n@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
93527
search the web and check them for authenticity, cross-referencing them with one another. there's a lot of misinformation going around as well.