I just watched the 'conspiracy theory'once released by the FOX tv network
211467
Yes man landed on the moon. The flag was not waving in any kind of breeze. The flag had a wire in it so that it appeared to be standing out in a breeze. NASA thought that would look better than a flag simply lying flat against a pole. Really now, if NASA was bright enough to pull off this kind of conspiracy, don't you think they would have had enough sense to make sure a flag didn't move.
301226
I'm very weary of the conspiracy theories. As one of the people who watched the plane go into the Pentagon (literally watched it hit), it makes me very annoyed to see how many people think so many other people could be wrong, imaging things, or a part of a conspiracy. Maybe the theory would be credible if no one was around to watch.  But between NYC and DC/Arlington, both in the tail end of rush hour commuter traffic, you'd have to get about 50,000 people to agree to this conspiracy. I find it insulting and I am immediately annoyed by anyone who actually thinks these web sites are reporting the truth.
322379
I really loved the one (I think they put it in that Michael Moore 9/11 film) that went along the lines of:\n\n"we've got to do everything we can, use all our power, never rest never sleep, lets devote all our time towards stopping these terrorist killers... now watch this drive"\n\nthat was fucking classic\n\nhe's such a moron.\n\nP.S. the kansas guy who wrote stuff two above me is clearly a pompous fool.\n\nYou Yanks may not have had the most able folk in office over the years but the man Bush Jr rivals his dad and even(dare I say it, oh i think I will) Ronald Reagan in the stupid rich prick that everyone with more than half a brain (so obviously that excludes all those in the bible-bashing right club) will have nothing except a absolute disdain for.
612640
Close minds think alike lol, never heard of it, but i'll check it out, i'd like to hear something different than Fox News, CNN or MSNBC once in a while.
284236
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change
286265
I saw that on an episode of Law and Order.
90312
I was brought to tears when I saw the twin towers at the end of that film. of course 9-11 is an emotional subject, but i was broken up more because of the huge significance and symbolism of the scene. the movie is a beautiful illustration of how violence only begets violence, and showing the WTC just showed how until this cycle is broken, that events of 1947 will lead to events of 1972 will lead to events of 2001. i will never understand why people keep thinking that the solution to 9-11 and other attacks is the same, ridiculously ineffective reaction man always comes up with.  it is like repeatedly throwing gasoline onto forest fires and insisting every time that it is starting to put it out.
75521
Well, I once watched this documentary with these two people named Fox and Scully investigating such things, but I think they go shut down, or was that cancelled? :P\n  I would imagine so, but it would be more in the area of para-psychology not supernatural beings.
366857
Unbelievable...you only watch fox if you want the un-truth.  She'll be quietly shipped off to the gas chamber!
326306
It was a conspiracy....by terrorists.  Duh....
9105
First of all - the first post was correct. This was not real. An immediate family member of mine was in the state police when the movie came out and informed everyone they could find that the movie was JUST AN INTRIGUING MOVIE. Yes law enforcement WAS bombarded with phone calls about the film. (As a side note - many people called to volunteer to help search for the missing kids.) There were so many calls for a while that it began to seriously strain local resources. \n\nSecond of all - that movie made me gave me the worst motion-sickness. Ugh. It was bad enough that I can't even really give a fair evaluation of any other element of the film. I can just say that the cinematography, while being a large part of the point, really detracted from the film for me.
660187
I think that the pseudo-documentary does make some valid points, but unfortunately discounts valid explanations in favor of a vague conspiracy. \nI am a little disappointed at the tactics of the makers of this film. They uploaded torrents for downloads of the Loose Change movie under other headings, in order to get their message out, which seems kinda slimy. They also use this forum, like the person who asked this question, in order to make a buck.\n\nThe main point is the same in any criminal investigation: in any crime (and 9-11 was a crime), what is the motive? Who stands to gain? I know why the terrorists did it, and why they targeted the buildings they did. If its some darkconspiracy, I am unsure who did it and why.\n\nUnfortunately, the movie-makers don't either. While the conspiracy documentary asks a few good questions, it doesn't follow up on them with anything approaching research, and leaves the viewer feeling used by the movie-makers.
295008
I have seen several of the conspiracy theory films and they do make me think.\n\nThey insist that the WTC buildings one and two had to have explosive charges placed in them like a controlled demo for them to come down as fast as they did.\n\nThey show, and you can see, puffs of smoke coming out of windows floors below the floors collapsing.  Is this really PROOF that there were explosive charges.  You do not see any flashes with the puffs of smoke.\n\nThey show other tall building fires where they fires lasted longer and the buildings did not collapse.  But in the WTC collapses there were gigantic planes that hit and did a lot of structural damage.  There was also jet fuel that created the fires.  There was a tremendous amount of weight suspended above where the planes hit.  I remember thinking that it was amazing that the buildings did not fall down.  Of course, later they did.\n\nA few years ago (before 9/11/01) there was a 10 floor building being built in Bridgeport CT. There was a construction accident on one of the upper floors and the weight of what fell just massively overwhelmed the support below.  The whole building fell to the ground just like a controlled demo, just like the WTC towers.  There was no bomb, no plane hitting the building, no fire.\n\nI think that there was a lot of damage on the floors where the planes hit.  All it would take would be for one floor to fail and everything above it drops and hits the floor below.  Imagime how much weight that is.  It only gets heavier as it goes.\n\nStill, how the planes and bodies at the Pentagon and in PA completely vaporized makes you wonder.  One film says that flight 93 went to Cleveland and all the passangers were taken off the plane and that even the cell phone calls were fakes.  They do not say what happened to the real passangers after.  Were they all shot?\n\nA lot of the conspiricy theories have as many holes as the supposed cover ups.  Their idea of proof is often pretty lame.
301964
Yes, I saw it on one of Robert Winston's documentaries ---\n\ncheck it out on BBC site (UK)\n\nIt was really interesting
481155
I have seen the movie. It's impossible to avoid bias in things like these. Clearly Al Gore was/is concerned about Global Warming, but  it's impossible to comment on what should/could/would have happened if things had been different in the election. \n\nI thought the movie was super informative and interesting. It definitely made me think about global warming. It's a really important subject and I think the movie does a good job of introducing the issue to people who might be less informed about it. Go check it out!
215188
I totally just watched it.. what was UP with that hotel scene!!??  \n\nWeird seminary hard ons.  RANDOM!!! \n\nADDICTED!!! YES!!! hahaha
576777
I watch it.I wish I could go on that show!It's suspenseful.I would just pick the numbers from the top of my head at that time.