What is her political goal
208117
i think she is someone who care for the children and try to protect them.
91538
1. Politics\n2. Politics\n3. Politics
370737
I don't understand the strong hatred either.  I would hate to think it is because she is a woman, but I strongly suspect that is the real issue. \n\nShe has some very good ideas.  And I am very glad she was elected to the Senate. \n\nPeace.
238260
the lady senator...sorry i dont know. I am not into politics...
601765
I think you're misdefining politically progressive, but of course you understand she's pre-positioning for a presidential run to appeal to moderates. Common knowledge of her defies her voting record though.
326012
NO NO NO\n\nshe did a lousy job the last time she was in office
169093
I think she needs some more political experience before she'll be ready to be president.  She comes from an academic background, and she needs to have some more time mixing it up behind the scenes.
423508
No, she shouldnt. People are trying to make her president not because she is the best candidate but because she is a woman (I'm a feminist myself, so I have really given this thought).  She is not a top choice, her past is full of scandal, her campaigning is full of scandal, and her run as a senator is shady in many ways. There are plenty of better choices.
210715
I saw her speak about a year ago when she came to my University.  What you need to remember is that she's essentially facilitating a pep rally.  You dont' logically disect how your team is better in an unbiased manner at pep rallies you get everyone pumped up and tear the other guys down.\n\nAs far as how she's mean spirited I don't think you can make that assumption based on her public speaking.  She's a professional pep monger and you have to be mean to the other guys to be good in her line of work.\n\nLiberals have their own Ann Coulters and their diatribes are often baseless and usually mean spirited.  I assume that they too are intelligent people to be so good at what they do.\n\nPersonally I try to stay above all of it but you have to understand how the political system in this country works. You certainly aren't alone in your frustration with them \n\nThere are at least two of us:)\n\nKeep it cool,\nArmus
2582
I seriously hope she couldn't. People NEED to have experience working in politics before they should be allowed to run for president. At the very least, she should have to work her way up. Then, I believe she would have a very good chance.
328942
She is the only female head of state in the Middle East. By achieving that she showed that the advancement of women and the protection of their rights needn't be in conflict with Islam.
508751
Hilary does what? What is she running for next year and I haven't heard her say yet she's running for Pres she needs to get Pelosi's permission first!
515728
Why the persistent dishonesty and rudeness from this educated southern lady? These Repubicans will sell their souls for anything, but her price probably isn't cheap. She's been promised something --another cabinet post, an ambassadorship, or Senate majority leader to replace Frist.  \n\nA number of good answers here -- proof that when you ask an intelligent question on this site, you CAN get good answers.
503808
It could be either, but my guess is a woman.  A Clinton/Obama ticket is not out of the question.  They'd have to put Hillary in as President and Obama as VP, simply because of his lack of practical experience in national politics.  2008 is going to be a very interesting year!
143653
The goals of Clinton's agenda were:\n1. Economic Leadership and a Stronger Economy.\n2. Fighting Crime and Restoring Our Communities.\n3. Strengthening Our Families: Security and Opportunity\n4. Cutting Bureaucracy\n5. Making Education A Priority\n6. Expanding Markets for American Products\n7. Protecting Our Environment\n8. Promoting Security and Freedom Abroad\n\nNeoliberalism is widely used as a description of the revived form of economic liberalism that became increasingly important in international economic policy discussions from the 1970s onwards.  I have added two links that go into a thorough description of neoliberalism.
194552
Speaking from your point of view, it would be an interesting demographic.  She would certainly capture the great majority of the conservative vote.  Those who were sexist or racist (who can be found in either political party) would probably just not vote, instead of voting liberal.  I would imagine she would also capture some of the vote from people who would like to see a woman be President, and a portion of people who would like to see a racial minority as president.  In addition, she is very well spoken, was a child prodigy, and comes from Colorado, so would be a darling of the West.  I imagine, because of the demographics, she would be the favorite to win.  A very interesting scenerio would be Condy Rice vs. Hillary Clinton-in that case, the fact that both candidates were women would take that advantage (or disadvantage, depending on how deeply entrenched sexism is) away.  Then it would be a straight-up contest against two very powerful, brilliant, and politically astute women, from opposite ends of the spectrum.  As it is, there is essentially a 50/50 split between conservatives and liberals, so it would come down to which could appeal to the middle-of-the-road voter better.  I think Clinton is likely closer to center than Rice is, but Rice would have a fairly large bloc of minority voters on her side- I bet it would be a fascinating campaign!
545142
They are two groups of people who have different ideas about how things should be done in the country, tell her that the idea of democracy is that the people get to decide which veiws they relate with. further explain to her that it is bad to become closedminded in ones following of a politcal party.