Base on the human aspect and nation prior to the borrowing of  money from the  overdeveloped and IMF .and its efect.
214206
In one way yes, the other no.\n\nA debtor who does not look confident and who does not put the money he borrows to a proper use (by utilising it for the purpose for which he borrowed it) is always a potential slave to the creditor.\n\nCreditors are also in the look out for debtors who utilise their money properly and thereby create an ensurity to them for regular returns.  In these cases creditors are supportive of the debtors even if they fail in their business, because they believe in the debtors ability.\n\nThere are exceptions to this but..\n\nhttp://www.futureaccountant.com/
58392
The flow of funds from other nations enables U.S. firms to finance more investments in capital goods, but it also creates concerns. For example, in order for foreigners to invest in U.S. savings accounts and U.S. government or corporate bonds, they must have dollars. As they demand dollars for these investments, the price of the dollar in terms of other nations’ currencies rises. When the price of the dollar is rising, people in other countries who want to buy U.S. exports will have to pay more for them. That means they will buy fewer goods and services produced in the United States, which will hurt U.S. export industries. This happened in the early 1980s, when U.S. companies such as Caterpillar, which makes large engines and industrial equipment, saw the sales of their products to their international customers plummet. The higher value of the dollar also makes it cheaper for U.S. citizens to import products from other nations. Imports will rise, leading to a larger deficit (or smaller surplus) in the U.S. balance of trade, the amount of exports compared to imports.\n\nForeign investment has other effects on the U.S. economy. Eventually the money borrowed must be repaid. How those repayments will affect the U.S. economy will depend on how the borrowed money is invested. If the money borrowed from foreign individuals and companies is put into capital projects that increase levels of output and income in the United States, repayments can be made without any decrease in U.S. living standards. Otherwise, U.S. living standards will decline as goods and services are sent overseas to repay the loans. The concern is that instead of using foreign funds for additional investments in capital goods, today these funds are simply making it possible for U.S. consumers and government agencies to spend more on consumption goods and social services, which will not increase output and living standards.\n\nIn the early history of the United States, many U.S. capital projects were financed by people in Britain, France, and other nations that were then the wealthiest countries in the world. These loans helped the fledgling U.S. economy to grow and were paid off without lowering the U.S. standard of living. It is not clear that current U.S. borrowing from foreign nations will turn out as well and will be used to invest in capital projects, now that the United States, with the largest and wealthiest economy in the world, faces a low national savings rate.
414427
and borrowed more money from foreign countries than every president before him put together.. fact.\nincluding Saudi Arabia\nChina \nSouth Africa\nJapan...\nthese guys have been something else all together, and we haven't seen the last of them yet.
174592
Developing nations are creating their own problems. The US gives them more aid than most of them do for themselves.
230890
World Bank\nhttp://www.worldbank.org/index.html
307707
The bottom line is it is about the all mighty dollar.  Maintaining access to foreign goods means that our government feels a need to exhaust our resources to "make nice" with other countries to help them with their strife--at the sacrifice of our own needs.  Sure there are some of the richest people on the planet here, but not all.  There are also a lot of severely impoverished as well.  We need to get our priorities straight as a nation.
86834
I would say no. Countries that are more developed like ours are going to suffer, intially. While poorer, more underdeveloped countries will reap more benefits, at least in the earlier stages.
27204
Globalization means integrating our economy with world economy.
391484
we got alliens more developed than humans
314329
Through the years, there have been a number of approaches to this issue: the first measurements of economic development relied on GDP per capita, expressed in terms of a numerary currency, such as the American dollar; this method of measurement has been all but abandoned by international financial institutions in favor of GDP per capita adjusted by purchasing power parity (PPP). A more holistic approach has been favored by institutions such as the United Nations Development Program, which annually measures the Human Development Index (HDI) for a wide number of nations; the HDI is composed of three variables:\n\n1. GDP per capita, adjusted by PPP\n2. Life expectancy at birth\n3. Literacy proportion\n\nFor more info on GDP calculations and PPP, look them up in a macroeconomics textbook: Dornbusch, Fisher and Startz or Mankiw are good options.
67251
Too early for the Rennaisance. Look at the effects of the Bubonic Plague (1348-1352) on the production of food per person, specifically in Britain. This increase in "income" allowed resources to be allocated to the production of capital goods and the development of new technologies.
561730
It goes beyond that - some of the basic principals upon which our economic system are very very flawed.  For more information read this book by Robert A. Heinlein.  While it is set as a novel, it is more a combination of essays about our antiquated, pre-technology social system.  He has a detailed appendix with provable examples of the problem with our economics system - it is fascinating.
348739
It relates to how the individual or in this case humans have a tendancy to get by for less, less effort, and less spending for the gotten gain.
277799
Of course its good for the country, it shows that the economical situations in the country are improving and the investors are earing.\nThere is no bad point i can find about it.
138953
it can vary by day to day economy.
325550
They get kick-backs from big companies-Pharmaceutical-Oil-and anyone else who wants to show their love for favors.\n\nThey also borrow from differnt programs\n\nAnd the Money in the Big Bank makes interest.
578669
The exchange rate is critical to a country's economic stability.  Significant fluctuations can cause a panic and the country won't be able to pay its bills.  For example, country Y owes country X one billion dollars.  If the value of the dollar goes from 1 Euro to 2 Euros, country Y would still have to pay the billion dollars, but it would actually cost country Y two billion to make the payment.  As for the IMF, if it's the lender of last resort, then duh -- yes it's important to the desperate country which may need the money to buy food for its people because it had a bad harvest due to weather, insects or war.