You are in a room with two doors. One leads to heaven. The other leads to hell. In front of each door is a talking parrot. One always tells the truth. The other always tells a lie. You have no idea which bird is in\nfront of which door. You can ask one of the birds one question to correctly determine the doorway to heaven. What question do you ask and to which bird?
211257
I'll ask "What will the other parrot say if i ask which one is the door to heaven?"..\nAnd i'll take the other door than what i was told........\n\nExplanation - Through this question i will get the wrong door whether its the liar parrot or the truthful parrot.Because:\n1. Truthful parrot will tell the truth, i.e. he knows the liar will point to the hell door if asked about heaven door and so he will point to the hell door as my answer.\n2. The liar parrot will lie,he knows that the truthful parrot will point to the heaven door when asked abou heaven door, but he will lie and point to the hell door as my answer.
422000
How much is that Doggie in the window, \nIt;s really nothing you see,\nIt might be a Pomeranian or a Pit-Bull\nA real Indian delicacy.\nHow is that for an Indian Joke?\nSorry, but I had to respond to your response for my jokes, Hope I offended you this time. NOT Take care. BASSCATCHER.
625227
We got chicken in the barn...Who's barn? What barn?! My barn!!!  Gotta be "Whole Lotta Shakin" Goin' On"!  \n\n\nGO KILLER GO!!!!!!!
200378
A wonderful bird is the pelican,\nIts beak can hold more than its belly can.\n\n:)
146176
Parrots ARE smarter than doves, but you're right about the muscles being the deciding factor rather than the brain. Given the sounds I've heard coming from both, parrots have more "agile" syrinxes than doves.
671283
Question:  Does God truly exist?\n\nAnswer:  You won't know for sure until you die.
306222
What is the question??
614266
Here's a riddle:\nYou are on an island where all of the natives tell only lies and all of the visitors tell only the truth.  You need to ask if the Coconut Restaurant is next to the Bamboo Bar.  You go up to two people you see on the street; one is a visitor and one a native, but you don't know which is which.  You can only ask one question to get your answer, so what question do you ask and who do you ask it to?\nAnswer: You can ask either one of them, "What would your friend say?"  Then, do the exact opposite.\nWhy: If you ask the native, he knows that his friend would tell the truth, but he lies.  He, therefore, is giving you the opposite answer from what you need.  If you ask the visitor, he knows that his friend would lie, but he tells the truth.  He also is giving you the wrong answer.\n\nIf you need an endless supply of riddles and word problems, find the game called MindTrap.  Hope this helps.
70111
Why did the chicken Cross the road?\n\nYa never really know.\n\nmo that is just ignorance. ///// I didnt mean Black people are ignorant.
660881
I have seen "which came first, the chicken or the egg", I have seen "why did the chicken cross the road" I have seen "how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck would chuck wood", but the one I thought was the dumbest was the one which went "??????????????"
41799
I totally agree with the inference of your question. I have read the answers and looked up a suggested site that presents both sides of the argument - a very good reference.\nMy pet (pun intended) contradiction is about the number of birds that went into Noah's Ark. Gen. 6:20 ≠ Gen. 7:3  \n\nFirst let me say, that I only see a literal contradiction, the meaning or spirit of the story of Noah and the flood is far more important than the contradictions in detail.\n\nThe explanation by the apologist is that the reference to two animals refers to the order the animals boarded the Ark, so allowing for seven pairs of the same species of animal.\n\nFor me, a reasonable explanation of the difference is that one root story (Ch 6) came from a tribe  where the animals would be seen as only being needed for propagation, while the other root story (Ch 7) was from a tribe where, clean animals would have been needed for food supplies as well as propagation.\n\nThe answer to your question is I suggest, that those who hold to a literal interpretation, deny the contradiction by going to extreem lengths of explaination to maintain the possibility of literal truth.  They do this because literal truth is an easier to argue, than finding a compassionate integration of God's message into the reality of human life.
575182
Life is heaven\nDying is hell
237167
The chicken cuz God created all animals not eggs
599483
ask the either brother which door the other brother would pick as paradise and then  go through the opposite door than the one stated..
478951
A flying camel . The answer is about as logical as the question
618784
A college student was in a philosophy class which had a discussion about God's existence. The professor presented the following logic: "Has anyone in this class heard God?" Nobody spoke.\n\n"Has anyone in this class touched God?" Again, nobody spoke.\n\n"Has anyone in this class seen God?"\n\nWhen nobody spoke for the third time, he simply stated, "Then there is no God."\n\nOne student thought for a second, and then asked for permission to reply. Curious to hear this bold student's response, the professor granted it, and the student stood up and asked the following questions of his classmates:\n\n"Has anyone in this class heard our professor's brain?"\n\nSilence.\n\n"Has anyone in this class touched our professor's brain?"\n\nAbsolute silence.\n\n"Has anyone in this class seen our professor's brain?" When nobody in the class dared to speak, the student concluded, "Then, according to our professor's logic, it must be true that our professor has no brain!"\n\n(...The student received an "A" in the class.)
671374
I would ask, "What would the other angel say about your pathway? to each of them. One would say, "He would say that my pathway leads to Hell," (which is the truth, otherwise if he were lying, then the other angel would be the truth teller, and lier would not say that that would be what the other would say, becuase that would be the telling the truth) and then the other would say, "He would say me pathway leads to heaven." (which is a lie, becuase if he were the truth teller, the other angel would be the lyer, and the lyer would not say that other's led to heaven, otherwise, he would be telling the truth)So, the angel that said, "He would say that my pathway lead to Hell," Is the path that leads to heaven.