is it really true?\nwhat prove or evidence is there?
205290
nope...\nbelow is a website...\nhttp://www.wildsingapore.com/news/20050910/050906-1.htm \nthis website says that banning is not a solution...\nthis is made by the Head, Resource Conservation Department, National Environment Agency (NEA)
182691
he is alive and I've got some evidence...see it all makes sense one you check the link below\n\nIt all makes perfect sense
66857
Geez, can't you find a beter conspiracy than that?\n\nOr, is it that the complete lack of evidence is only further proof the conspiracy is working?
253914
It is false, trust me!
86975
Both are true. No proof required.\n\nNot many details as far as your question goes, sorry I couldn't be more specific.
227098
is that really all true!?
456795
A theory COULD be true even if the experiment to prove it was flawed.  It simply isn't PROVED to be true until an UNflawed experiment proves it.
646896
In physical sciences there is no such thing as a proven theory. The best thing a theory can do, is to undergo innumerable tests of which not a single one contradicts it (example: the second law of thermodynamics). Then we speak of it as a reality.\n\nI'm far away from being an expert, but since there are so many different "Big bang theories"  (cosed universe, open universe...) I would say, that none is very close to being "proven" (because the appropriate experiments are not yet possible or found). \n\nHowever I think that the idea of an early universe which was very hot and dense (one of the model's crucial ideas) is widely accepted. Facts pointing in that direction are the observations of  redshifts by HubbleSpaceTeescope or the detection of an isotropic cosmic microwave background (in it's own rest-frame!)
458091
neither exist... show me some proof.
82845
The Big Bang Theory has not been proven. Don't believe every piece of hype that you read. Many predictions of BB and related theories have been verified. Many others have been contradicted. Same with some ID and Creation theories. Some have been verified, some have been contradicted. Many evidences claimed to support a billions-years-old universe also support other explanations. Usually it's just a matter of premises.
110970
Anybody have any proof....one way or the other?
163246
cannot prove or disprove this hypothesis.\n\npast empirical proof has been to tell someone to throw something up and see.  this worked until we started putting things in orbit...and beyond.\n\nnow, how do we know (or not) that those items that have exceeded our known local planetary orbit patterns will not come back because of a larger as yet unforeseen orbit?\n\nif anyone attempts to prove or disprove this it must include a hypothesis that effectively refutes the steady-state universe vs. the big-bang theories.\n\nthis would effectively place matter consumed by black-holes back to the initial "down" and all "up" would eventually return to the same place or "come down."\n\notherwise it is a lie.  technology and our knowledge of the structure of up and down have already effectively refuted this infantile "law" of gravity.  but thanks for reminding us of our humble beginnings in thinking.
60530
No, nobody really can prove it, with assuming several axioms\nfirst. There are certain things you have to assume are true in your universe, without necessary being able to check them. From those axioms, you can derive conclusions (theorems) that are always true, but only in that particular\nuniverse. The discussed operation of addition is one such theorem. If you assume that the axioms of natural numbers are true, then this addition becomes quite trivival. If you assume those axioms of natural numbers to be false, then the above operation of addition might become false with a different set of supposition. In other words, only with the facts given, one cannot prove, nor disprove, the fact of addition. It all depends on the set of assumptions you would have made before adding the two ones.
274100
It is not a fact and there is no proof of it. When it does happen there can be many explanations from hallucination to lack of oxygen to the brain. From a belief perspective that is another story and to each his own.
56511
There seems to be an overwhelming amount of evidence to support this. Do I believe in it? I think I would have to see it myself to believe it but not ruling out that it does exist
307996
That's not true - hope someone can clarify this for you
2314
Its evidence, but not conclusive.\n\nIf you start hanging out you'll get a better picture.