For all the Clinton facts which are too numerous to mention:\n\n\nhttp://www.nonprofit.net/hoax/catalog/paranoia/Death_of_Clinton_Associates_scarelore.txt
216370
In a word: favorably.\n\nAnd speaking of fun Clinton facts: the bookstores have finally moved his so-called biography to the section in which it should have been placed from the start: Fiction.
235023
This may not help you directly with this question, but it's loaded with all sorts of other facts ...\nhttp://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html
135631
Yes. This one time I watched an ENTIRE speach by Hillary Clinton. Man, my life flashed before my eyes at least a dozen times. Spooky.
33076
Not sure but Bill Clinton was pretty good at it. He was even caught up in his lies multiple times and had to go on the air to take some of them back.
487389
Thanks for giving inforamtion instead of "belief."  There is so much corruption in politics today, and anyone who doesn't see the lies needs to see the facts.
284967
Cheney's friend did not die, the same can not be said for Mary Joe Kapekne.  Before you go and say that was so long ago do not forget the rape case in the Kennedy coumpound in West Palm Beach, and just recently another Kennedy was popped driving under the influence and was given the same preferential treatment as good old Teddy. Let's not forget Jefferson who accepted a $100,000 bribe then gets upset because the FBI searched his office as part of the investigation. What Clinton did (&^%*# an intern) would have gotten any CEO of a US company fired, but nothing was done for that (remember the empeachment was for lying to the Grand Jury under oath). Another Dem smacks a security guard because he asked her for I.D... Let's face it ALL politicians get preferential treatment. That's the problem, if you want to say the other side gets more preferential treatment I could go on. If I really have to go on, there is just no sense of doing so.
350347
There is a lot of speculation that yes, it could have been.  But the theory seems so dramatic and terrible that you have to wonder, would/could/did  the president of the United States and his cabinet really orchestrate such a terrible thing?  \n\nYet some of the evidence is undeniably damning.  I don't know if we'll ever know for certain. I hope for the sake of the victims and the well being of our country, that the truth will come out some day.
167205
go here  www.wikipedia.com,it should have facts about all of them ok.
654032
How about videos (right side of the page)?: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/11/17/politics/main656124.shtml?CMP=ILC-SearchStories\n\nHope that helps - enjoy!
213533
No bias here just facts.  please read below:\n\nClinton:\n\nDuring Clinton's tenure, the U.S. enjoyed continuous economic expansion, reductions in unemployment, and growing wealth through a massive rise in the stock market. The economic boom ended in Q1, 2000, 10 months before his term ended in January, 2001, possibly indicative of a stock market bubble. Although the reasons for the expansion are continually debated, Clinton proudly pointed to a number of economic accomplishments, including:\n\nMore than 22 million new jobs \nHomeownership rate increase from 64.0% to 67.5% \nLowest unemployment rate in 30 years \nHigher incomes at all levels \nLargest budget deficit in American history converted to the largest surplus of over $200 billion \nLowest government spending as a percentage of GDP since 1974 [7] \nHigher stock ownership by families than ever before \n220% increase in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, 300% increase in the Nasdaq from 1993 to 2001 \nThe reasons for this growth are hotly debated, but Clinton supporters cite his 1993 tax increase as the reason that eventually led to the reduction in the annual budget deficits every year of his tenure. These deficit reductions stimulated consumption and consumer spending and strengthened the dollar, which encouraged foreign investment in the United States economy. Alan Greenspan supported the 1993 tax increase, which was approved by Congress without a single Republican vote. [8] Critics of Clinton point to Alan Greenspan's strong chairmanship of the Federal Reserve, 1995 spending cuts and the Republican Party's Contract with America initiatives as alternative reasons for America's strong economic growth of the late 90's. Critics also argue that the economic recovery had already begun before Bill Clinton took office and did not pick up momentum until 1995 and 1996, after the GOP took over Congress (despite the fact that GDP growth was higher in 1994 than in either 1995 or 1996). Many economists attribute massive growth to the dot-com boom which just happened to come during Clinton's term, thus adding many new jobs which may not be directly attributed to policies of the Clinton administration.\n\nIn 1999, Clinton was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice by the U.S. House of Representatives. He was acquitted by the Senate. The perjury charge arose from Clinton's testimony about his relationship to Monica Lewinsky during a sexual harassment lawsuit brought by former Arkansas-state employee Paula Jones. The obstruction charge was based on his actions during the subsequent investigation of that testimony. On February 12, the Senate concluded a 21-day trial with the vote on both counts falling short of the Constitutional requirement of a two-thirds majority to convict and remove an office holder. The final vote was generally along party lines, with all of the votes to convict being cast by Republicans. On the perjury charge 55 senators voted to acquit, including 10 Republicans, and 45 voted to convict; on the obstruction charge the Senate voted 50-50. [22] Clinton, like the only other president to be impeached, Andrew Johnson, served the remainder of his term.\n\nThe day before leaving office, Clinton agreed to a five-year suspension of his Arkansas law license as part of an agreement with the independent counsel to end the investigation. Based on this suspension, Clinton was also automatically suspended from the United States Supreme Court bar, from which he chose to resign. [17][18] Clinton's resignation was mostly symbolic, as he had never practiced before the Supreme Court and was not expected to in the future. Clinton also was assessed a $90,000 fine by federal judge Susan Webber Wright for contempt of court. The Paula Jones lawsuit was settled out of court for $850,000.\n\nIn addition to impeachment and the Whitewater scandal, the Clinton White House was the subject of many other controversies.\n\nThe White House travel office con
619589
Clinton lied in court.  thats perjury!
567228
Here's a good place to look\n\nhttp://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html
675856
You might have heard an over the top version of a conspiracy theory about former White House deputy council Vince Foster.  What happened was that Foster committed suicide.  However, some people allege that Hillary Clinton was behind it.  \n\nThe theories usually revolve around the impending Whitewhater investigation.  Some people think that Foster had incriminating evidence and Clinton had him killed as opposed to having him testify against Bill and her.\n\nAs for the theory you are referring to, it is a very unlikely conspiracy theory that only the "level headed minds" like Ann Coulter and David Brock perpetuated.  Those people believe that in addition to the Whitewhater evidence the other reason Clinton had Foster killed was because of an affair between them that was going to be revealed.\n\nWith this all said there has never been a verified claim of an affair between Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster.
383667
Go to the democrats.org and gop.org websites. You'll find the information there. Just rephrase it; it should take about one hour, or two if you're a slow writer like me.
180383
Hey suzyQ. You can say what you want about Clinton, but he cared what was going on at home. Granted, he lied, but about a woman. But lets go over Bush's lies, shall we?. First, it was weapons of mass destruction. Oh sorry, I was wrong. Well, lets get the madman Saddam out, and all will be well. That done, lets fight terror. He changes his mind like people change their socks. And troops are dying every day for it. Presidents have faced impeachment for less.
553336
Clinton did kill people too . He also was otherwise preoccupied when the terrorists were planning 911. He let Bin Laden go free. More than 40 people who had dealings with Clinton died mysteriously. Bush is A man of integrity. He stopped Saddam before he had his nuclear weapon. Clinton gave away the instructions on how to builds one. Liberals are impossible to deal with. Illogical people are that way. They don't let facts get in the way of a good Bush bashing. I wish they could study your pea brains and figure what went wrong. Aussie chick this is none of your business.
566663
Well never know.\n\nFrom what I read, people didn't believe Nixon could have known about that watergate thing.