Sabine Pilot Services, Inc. v. Michael Andrew Hauck
199721
I don't know about Texas, but it is hard to find briefs online for most cases.  US Supreme Court briefs are often online.  Otherwise, in my expereince, the easiest way is to look at the case and contact the lawyers who briefed the case and ask them to send you a copy.  Most lawyers will.  Otherwise you can look at the court files in Austin or have an attorney service pull it for you.
402592
to the last guy no she doesn't need writing skills she had a limit and had to fit everything in so she cut back letters. anyway not sure where you live that would be a big help. you can go outside of your county for an attorney. i would never buy anything off of the street. too late for that now though. obviously the antique riffle wasn't for illegal use and the bottles were obviously prescribed. a good attorney outside of the crooked circle should be able to get him off. as far as not being allowed food or a call. that's against his rights and is a possible law suit.
145365
This is a listing of briefs for cases currently on the Docket.  The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR case is an employment discrimination case.  I've also posted a link to the latest slip opinions.\n\nhttp://www.abanet.org/publiced/preview/briefs/home.html\nhttp://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05slipopinion.html
304532
very weird, instead of sewing them SUE.  Don't beleive any DOT laws were broken, you may have something on abandonment, but only a lawyer will know for sure.
72070
The decision was based on the 14th amendment.  The case was Afroyim vs. Rusk and details can be found at:\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afroyim_v._Rusk
530194
The answer would depend upon your state laws.  Please check with an attorney in your state.
168407
I'm a 23yr veteran Texas peace officer. I don't know CA law but you might check to see if CA has a criminal law in the penal code that addresses avoiding legal process. In Texas, it is a criminal violation to intentionaly avoid civil process.
538506
Unlawful search and seizure.
654767
http://www.lectlaw.com/def.htm
494383
Uh Lawyer Here--Do your own homework, start by reading the case, then look for comentary on it.  Also, you only got 2 days to do this?  Sounds like you left it to the last minute.  The case has to do with the remoteness of damages in contract and is related to the much earlier case of Hadley v. Baxendale.  \n\nA simple Google search has pulled up a scholarly article on this case--why is it that you couldn't do the same? Of course, I don't have access to the full article....
587397
since when ha was pulled over he was the legal custodian of the vehicle. Operation of vehicle can be sometimes imputed by operation of law through the employee and employer relationship.
582228
I think she is morally wrong to have him charged with manslaughter.  Sounds like the family found a way to make a quick fortune.  My ex did something similar.  Disgusting.
141631
I found links to the decision by the apeplate court but not by the lower court....hope this helps you though...see below\n\nhttp://www.bccla.org/othercontent/00twusccfactum.html\n\nhttp://www.lexum.umontreal.ca/csc-scc/en/pub/2001/vol1/html/2001scr1_0772.html
487000
Most of the grounds are gone.\nHowever he can still appeal based on, for example, duress in obtaining the plea bargain.
555350
FAA ALJ decisions are available in the reporter, "Clark Boardman Callaghan’s Federal Aviation Decisions" and decisions are also available through LEXIS and WestLaw. You may also want to search the FAA's website library, http://www.faa.gov/library/\n\nI would suggest using LEXIS, http://www.lexis.com/  unless you have access to a good law library. As a student, if you don't already have a password, you can request access to LEXIS or Westlaw through your school's library. \n\nGood luck!
154872
NTSB Identification: DCA78AA004\n14 CFR Part 135 Nonscheduled operation of L & J COMPANY\nEvent occurred Thursday, October 20, 1977 in GILLSBURG, MS\nAircraft: CONVAIR 240, registration: N55VM\n\n---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FILE    DATE          LOCATION          AIRCRAFT DATA       INJURIES       FLIGHT                        PILOT DATA                                                               F  S M/N     PURPOSE----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3-3896  77/10/20   GILLSBURG,MS        CONVAIR 240         CR-  2  0  0  COMMERCIAL                AIRLINE TRANSPORT, AGE        TIME - 1852                    N55VM               PX-  4 19  1  AIR TAXI-PASSG            34, 6802 TOTAL HOURS, 68                                       DAMAGE-DESTROYED    OT-  0  0  0                            IN TYPE, INSTRUMENT                                                                                                   RATED.        DEPARTURE POINT             INTENDED DESTINATION          GREENVILLE,SC               BATON ROUGE,LA        TYPE OF ACCIDENT                                         PHASE OF OPERATION           ENGINE FAILURE OR MALFUNCTION                            IN FLIGHT: NORMAL CRUISE           COLLIDED WITH: TREES                                     LANDING: FINAL APPROACH        PROBABLE CAUSE(S)           PILOT IN COMMAND - MISMANAGEMENT OF FUEL           MISCELLANEOUS ACTS,CONDITIONS - INATTENTIVE TO FUEL SUPPLY           MISCELLANEOUS ACTS,CONDITIONS - FUEL EXHAUSTION        FACTOR(S)           PILOT IN COMMAND - INADEQUATE PREFLIGHT PREPARATION AND/OR PLANNING           POWERPLANT - MISCELLANEOUS: OTHER        COMPLETE POWER LOSS - COMPLETE ENGINE FAILURE/FLAMEOUT-2 ENGINES        EMERGENCY CIRCUMSTANCES - FORCED LANDING OFF AIRPORT ON LAND        REMARKS- R ENG MALFUNCTION OF UNDETERMINED NATURE RESULTED IN HIGHER THAN NORMAL FUEL CONSUMPTION.
547779
I am of the opinion that the presiding judge is well within his right to record a fiding exparte and it is not in violation of the principle of natural justice, so long as the respondent was given due notice of the proceedings according him an opportunity to be heard. The principle of natural justice does not mean that no order can be passed without hearing the parties concerned. It only requires that the parties before the forum should be given an opportunity to being heard. If the respondent had any difficulty in appearing before the judicial forum, like paucity of funds or threat to life, that is an entirely different matter. There were several options before him to meet such situations. Paucity of funds cannot be a valid ground for non-appearance. It is upto him to fend for himself to protect his own interests. I am sure there are provisions in the law prevailing in the USA, as it is in many other countries, for free legal aid for the indigent citizens. He could have availed of free legal aid. As regards the intimidation, which purportedlty detained him from appearance, it was open to him to lodge a criminal complaint against the petitioner and a copy of the complaint, if produced before the judge, would have weighed in his favour, for further adjournemetnt of his case. \n\nNow, that the matter has come to an end, before the learned judge, he has got two options. One is that he file a petition for review before the very same judge who passed the order and the second one is preferring an appeal before the appeallate authoruity. You may do this through a legal aid forum, if any available.