Why is the history of this 'bank' relevant to "The War on Terror"?
218284
It is a place George Bush uses to rule the world! You Wacko! \n\nWhat are you doing on the internet, you should be at a gay parade or rallying for the spotted owl?
201581
a couple of points...\n\nA. anyone who says 9-11 is a retard... osama is in Pakistan... not Iraq... I know it's hard for you to wrap your mind around... but there is more than one country in the middle east... cite the link of 9-11 to Iraq... oh that's, right there aren't any \n\nB. See, defense contractors make a lot of money when we go to war... then if they make trillions, they give trillions to those that support the wars, like Republicans... also if we go to war in the middle east, the instablity it causes dirves up oil prices, so they make money and donnate more too... and our president may have some ties to oil as well?\n\n\nrfjanssen... simple question... why doesn't Bush do something about Osama... he's in Pakistan... he's "picked" on us? is he just a pansy?
626974
Just in case you were too stupid to catch it, that article is referring to the Patriot Act. Also know as "The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001" < If you think that is bad... well, you shouldn't be starting any political arguments.
152637
I wonder if you could look into some type of computer ani terrorism job?  I mean this is an open network and I remember some talk on one of the channels that the internet is an open channel for terrorism and that it was closely monitored.  Maybe punch in some keywords, anti-terrorism,interent, computer, jobs to monitor, security,internet terrorism............play around with the words and see what comes up?
648583
The U.S is WELL KNOWN to support financially and logistically to the same groups they fight. How did the Al-Qaeda became what it is? This is the SAME GUYS we called back then "The Mujaheddin", and got CIA support and money to fight the X USSR troops. Now they are the enemy. Now you see it Somalia, HISTORY DOES repeat itself, we support now the SAME PEOPLE we considered enemy and fought the U.S troops in '93 remember "Black hawk Down"?
623900
Firstly, I really like the phrasing of your question, Neddie. Beyond the fact I've always been a big fan of alliteration, there is some very clever wordplay in there. Nice!\n\nNeedless to say, I'll have nothing to do with this evil gang of criminals. The ANP is an atrocity and the bush administration IS the fourth reich writ large (in red, white and blue, alas). I truly loathe these people and everything they stand for.\n\nI'll try to read Suskind's book, as I never tire of seeing the truth about these murderous gangsters promulgated for all to see. Mind you, it's hard not to feel nauseous when contemplating that the deranged ann coulter's evil book of fallacies about Liberals is at or near the top of most best-seller lists. What is WRONG with this country?\n\nI'm not sure if the US government has forked over the reward money for al zarqawi's demise but I imagine the Iraqis who provided information on that evil bastard's hideout are entitled to it, blood money or nay. The relevant question, however, is what does it matter? His replacement has already begun carrying out atrocities on the same scale. I guess we'll offer the same reward for his "capture" and then do the same for his replacement, and so on, and so on, and so on... Good grief, when does this nightmare end?
604175
The War on Terror is nothing but an excuse to bludgeon Americans with fear while enriching the bank accounts of President Bush's cronies with debts that the taxpayers will be paying off generations to come. \n\nThis thread features a lot of tough talk by armchair warriors  yet I don't see them doing anything for Bush's "Worn Terra". Back in World War II we bought war bonds, rationed rubber and metal and tobacco and meat and gas, planted victory gardens, and recycled used fats for explosives. Women went to work in factories that were converted to the war effort. CEOs took dollar-a-year salaries. Homefront commandos patrolled our shores. Tax were raised. Consequently 4 years and nine months after Pearl Harbor Hitler was dead, Japan was conquered, and the UN was about to be formed.\n\nIn this War people put yellow stickers on their SUVs. After 9/11 Bush told us to go shopping. War profiteering is rampant. The war tab is now approaching half a trillion in the form of an IOU held by the Chinese and Saudis. Osama Bin Laden is hanging out in no-man's land in Pakistan. Iraq is in civil war with our troops in the way. The upper one percent just got another round of tax cuts. Most Americans care more about who won on American Idol than the War.\n\nThe War on Terror is improving the bank accounts of the upper one percent. It doesn't help anyone else. And it doesn't make less enemies because if someone wants to blow themselves up there ain't but so much you can do to stop them.  The London subway attacks, the Spanish train attacks, the Saudi oil field attacks, the Bali resort attacks, and the Anthrax Attacks now so conveniently forgotten by the armchair warriors here have proven that.
337249
It is privately owned, for several domestic and international banks, some of the owner's names are Rockefeller does that ring you a bell? they print money backed up by nothing and charge interest to the govmt! we all end up paying for it (40% of our fed income tax) while the rich gets richer, the funny thing is that it is illegal as per our constitution, and we could buy it back at 450 million to abolish it if we wanted too, unfortunately some guys like John Kennedy tried to eliminated and was shot... you can get more details from a CPA here:\n\nhttp://www.totse.com/en/politics/international_banking_money_laundering/fedbank.html
111994
The truth is that Karl Rove, Dick Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, etc. etc. had been working to make The Project For A New American Century (PNAC) a reality. The problem was how to sell such an ambitious plan to a MOTR public. Pax Americana might make some people nervous. But if there was something like a terrorist attack on the country, then it could be put in place....as it was. The fact is that Bush had some information on the likelihood of some kind of an attack, but they had no idea of the magnitude of what actually did happen.( Hey. Even OBL was surprised) But They let it go, thinking it would be something more typical yet good enough to get the country into a fighting mood, which is exactly what was needed for PNAC to survive. Indeed, what's so remarkable, is that the PNAC document itself bemoans the unlikeliness of getting the MOTR America to follow its more ambitious plans *unless* something catastrophic happened to change people opinions on such matters. 9/11 happened, and everything since Afghanistan fits the PNAC template perfectly. Want to know why Iraq was attacked while OBL was left alone? Read PNAC. Want to know why the animosity to the World Court, to the United Nations, to any international standards of behavior? Read PNAC. It's all there in black and white.
571861
Well, I think your idea could make sense, but it's a bit of a strech.\n\nHow do you explain that all the hijackers were Middle-Eastern and were connected with Al-Qeada? When you're fanatical enough to join a militant group that fights for your religion it's very hard to buy you off.
118229
I was unable to locate any reference to such company on BBB, US and UK government records, or major search engines.\n\nIf this is a scam, which is possible, it is not widespread to trigger any news, or records yet.
579939
It's not that it's convincing by itself. It's just that it ties in with what we heard on 9/11 in terms of news (much of which may have been unconfirmed). People make that connection between what they remember seeing in the news that day and what the government is telling us now and assume that because two sources are confirming the story, it must be true.
399465
It's an absolute outrage, and the sad truth is, this has been going on since BEFORE 9/11.  The link I've included below takes you to a paper written by the Center for Security Policy back in 2001.  In in turn references an investigative report that ran in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review back in January of 2001.  Those Investments go back to when Barbara Hafer was the State Treasurer.  This has been a known issue for almost six years, and as far as I'm concerned, Bob Casey along with everyone else who serves on the retirement fund board, should be charged with treason!\n\nThe paper below includes the entire original article, which gives the names of five companies, and how those companies are involved in aiding terrorists.
192101
inreality non of those ,the war was to make money for the european powers and especialy Rothchild.\nwww.infowars.
389572
Foreign Policy: The Terrorism Index \n... and progress from the very people who have run America's national security ... terrorists at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, negatively affects the war on terror. ...web1.foreignpolicy.com/issue_julyaug_2006/TI-index/index.html - 45k - Cached - More from this site \naffects \n... dollars would go up—even though they would not in terms of the foreign currency. ... If people believe that a tightening of policy means the Fed is determined to ...www.frbsf.org/publications/federalreserve/monetary/affect.html - 33k - Cached - More from this site \nForeign Policy: Writers' Guide \n... Effect looks at how modern technology affects political, economic, and cultural ... President Evo Morales warns Bolivia's people will rise up in revolt if ...www.foreignpolicy.com/office/for_writers.html
224637
I hear your comment, but not even the 3000 thousand that died in the towers equals the deaths from the American military. No death is valid as far as I am concerned. I really believe that America doesn't have the real story. An attack is a valid reason to sign a "Declaration of War," but the Bush Administration doesn't have one. I am concerned about this, as to it doesn't make any sense. Going into Iraq was unwarranted, and once again no "Declaration of War" was signed. This makes America appear to be just as much of a terrorist nation as the attackers. It's not proper etiquette to our Democracy and policies. The Republicans don't believe in Democracy, it is a Republic type of Government that America is being ruled by at the present. I don't agree with these types of policies and the rest of the World is also appalled by the Bush Administrations actions. All of this could lead to a larger Global War I am afraid. I say voting the Republicans out of office in November is Americas only choice at this point. I don't want to die for a small group of red-necks that stir up problems, and wont play a part in the military. My personal feelings that's all.
388259
Finally, someone who's been reading the de-classified documents besides me.  Bush Sr. was the best drug dealer, EVER.  His CIA ran the Drugs from which airport...Mena, Ark.  Who was governor?  Yup, Clinton!!!!  People WAKE UP.  Bush and Clinton have been in bed since the early 80's.\n\nDude, the War on Drugs enabled the USG to DOUBLE DIP.  Just like today:  under the Taliban, growing poppies in Afghan was a death sentence.  Now, under US/Afghan rule, Afghanistan has regained its spot as #1 poppy producing country.  HELLO!!!\n\nThe Afghan War was never funded by America until the Iraq war began...why...because we teamed with poppy producers to share the wealth..billions, while the USG kept billions to FIGHT the very drugs used to finance the downfall of the Taliban.  Granted, this is my own interpretation of the data...and I will not be proven correct or incorrect until the documents are declassified, in about 40 years, but, if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and talks like a duck, then you bet ur azz, its a duck.\n\nP.S.  The Savings and Loan scandal of the 80's was also a cover up...but you need to find that out for yourselves.