what was the dissenting opinion in wisconsin v yoder?
473127
Responding to Justice Douglas's dissent, the Court argued that the question before it was about the interests of the parents to exercise free religion, and did not relate to the child's First Amendment's rights. As such, the argument pertaining to the child's right to exercise free religion was irrelevant in this case.
305588
In Wisconsin, the estate executor is known as a "personal representative". Subject to approval of the court, executor fees are set at 2% of the net value of the estate assets, or a rate agreed with the decedent or the majority interest of the heirs.
1272923
An opinion letter, also called a legal opinion, is a letter issued by a legal counsel that facilitates a lender's due diligence process in a transaction. ... Lenders often require an opinion letter to act as proof of legal counsel's advice and conclusions regarding the loan documents relevant to the transaction.
1035759
The U.S. Supreme Court set up a test for obscenity in its 1973 decision Miller v. California. The Court provided three “basic guidelines”: Whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest.
1413242
In his dissenting opinion, Justice Rehnquist argued that the framers of the 14th Amendment did not intend for it to protect a right of privacy, a right which they did not recognize, and that they definitely did not intend for it to protect a woman's decision to have an abortion.
772441
What is the judge's opinion of Huck's father? He is thoroughly bad and cannot be reformed. He is prone to displaying unpredictable behavior. He should be trusted by Huck because he is his father.
1451299
Chief Justice of India, S A Bobde, on Tuesday, recused himself from hearing the plea of a convict on the death row in the Nirbhaya gangrape and murder case. A bench, headed by CJI Bobde, was to hear the review plea filed by Akshay Kumar Singh, who through his lawyer A.P.
538286
opinion - A judge's written explanation of a decision of the court. In an appeal, multiple opinions may be written. The court's ruling comes from a majority of judges and forms the majority opinion.
323569
In his dissenting opinion, Justice Stevens argued that Congress' commerce power enabled it not only to prohibit guns in schools, but to prohibit them anywhere. Guns are both articles of commerce and articles that can be used to restrain commerce.
1079466
Concurring Opinion (Douglas) Connecticut, the Supreme Court held that forbidding contraceptives is unconstitutional under the Bill of Rights and zones of privacy. The lower courts set precedent in Doe v.
154370
A majority opinion explains the reasoning behind the Court's ruling, while a dissenting opinion explains a disagreement with the Court's ruling.
424575
['Marbury v. Madison (1803) ... ', 'Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) ... ', 'Worcester v. Georgia (1832) ... ', 'Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge (1837) ... ', 'Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) ... ', 'Munn v. Illinois (1877) ... ', 'Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) ... ', 'Lochner v. New York (1905)']
367318
Wisconsin is a "no fault" divorce state, which means neither spouse must prove that the other has done anything wrong, and only one spouse must testify under oath that he or she believes that the marriage is irretrievably broken. A marriage is irretrievably broken when there is no chance for reconciliation.
314630
Simply put, a default judgment is a judgment against a defendant who fails to answer a lawsuit. ... These strict requirements are designed to provide defendants due process. On one hand, California law provides wronged parties a mechanism to seek damages where the wrong doer ignores a lawsuit.
1216702
['The statement complained of must be an expression of opinion.', 'The statement complained of must indicate the basis of the opinion.']
550884
In the 1947 Everson v. Board of Education, Justice Black invoked Thomas Jefferson stating, “The First Amendment has erected 'a wall of separation between church and state. ' . . . that wall must be kept high and impregnable.” Thomas Jefferson thought differently.
67967
The decision was 7-2, with Chief Justice Warren E. Burger and six other Justices voting for "Jane Roe", and Justices William Rehnquist and Byron White voting against it. The decision divided the nation and is still controversial today.