what is the meaning of cogent reasoning?
437377
A cogent argument is by definition non-deductive, which means that the premises are intended to establish probable (but not conclusive) support for the conclusion. Furthermore, a cogent argument is strong, so the premises, if they were true, would succeed in providing probable support for the conclusion.
863818
inference: A conclusion drawn from true or assumed-true facts. syllogism: A type of deductive reasoning, often in the form “All A are B; C is A; therefore, C is B.” reason: The capacity for consciously making sense of the world based on logic and evidence.
136555
A valid argument is reasoning that is comprehensive on the foundation of logic or fact. ... Therefore, inductive reasoning moves from specific instances into a generalized conclusion, while deductive reasoning moves from generalized principles that are known to be true to a true and specific conclusion.
210965
Propositional logic In propositional logic, hypothetical syllogism is the name of a valid rule of inference (often abbreviated HS and sometimes also called the chain argument, chain rule, or the principle of transitivity of implication).
283997
Rational thinking is defined as thinking that is consistent with known facts. Irrational thinking is thinking that is inconsistent with (or unsupported by) known facts.
380408
Three Characteristics of Good Arguments A cogent argument has three characteristics, according to Kahane and Cavender (1998): 1. All its premises are true. The premise(s), the reasons for accepting the conclusion(s), must be true – or, at least, believable – in order for the argument to be cogent.
655613
Inductive reasoning involves drawing conclusions from facts, using logic.
275048
['All-or-Nothing Thinking / Polarized Thinking. ... ', 'Overgeneralization. ... ', 'Mental Filter. ... ', 'Disqualifying the Positive. ... ', 'Jumping to Conclusions – Mind Reading. ... ', 'Jumping to Conclusions – Fortune Telling. ... ', 'Magnification (Catastrophizing) or Minimization. ... ', 'Emotional Reasoning.']
850305
Inductive reasoning does not guarantee a true result, but it does provide a means of making a conjecture. With deductive reasoning, we use general statements and apply them to spe- cific situations.
535279
The two major types of reasoning, deductive and inductive, refer to the process by which someone creates a conclusion as well as how they believe their conclusion to be true.
1382176
In brief: using inferences to solve problems. Chaser is the queen of inferential reasoning. Ask Chaser to fetch a toy she's never heard of out of a group of familiar toys, and she'll bring you the correct one.
1400446
Analytic reasoning represents judgments made upon statements that are based on the virtue of the statement's own content. ... Verbal reasoning is understanding and reasoning using concepts framed in words. It aims at evaluating ability to think constructively, rather than at simple fluency or vocabulary recognition.
723685
Deductive reasoning applies general rules to make conclusions about specific cases. Inductive reasoning observes patterns in specific cases to infer conclusions about general rules.
1065641
A REASON explains why the author believes the claim (or thinks it is true or valid). An argument may have one reason or multiple reasons to be strong. REASONING are statements that link evidence back to reasons or claims.
1010272
Fluid reasoning is the ability to think flexibly and problem solve. This area of reasoning is most reflective of what we consider to be general intelligence. ... Sequential reasoning- the ability to start with stated rules, premises, or condition and to engage in one or more steps to reach a solution to a problem.
420810
Inductive Reasoning. During the scientific process, deductive reasoning is used to reach a logical true conclusion. Another type of reasoning, inductive, is also used. ... It is important to learn the meaning of each type of reasoning so that proper logic can be identified.
976005
For example, the premise "Every A is B" could be followed by another premise, "This C is A." Those statements would lead to the conclusion "This C is B." Syllogisms are considered a good way to test deductive reasoning to make sure the argument is valid. For example, "All men are mortal.