are peer reviewed journals credible?
435822
Trade/Professional. Articles from scholarly, peer-reviewed, academic, and refereed journals are more credible than articles from popular or trade journals ('magazines') because they have gone through the most rigorous review process. They also have the most references or citations.
141662
Yes, review articles are peer-reviewed! It's a common enough misconception that, because an editor has already given an article (or at least its topic and outline) the green light to submit, reviews don't need to be reviewed and are simply accepted as a matter of course.
202241
Peer Reviewed Sources: Non-Peer Reviewed Sources Newspaper articles aren't written by experts on their topics. While they do undergo review by an editor, they don't receive peer review and are often biased to some degree. ... Book reviews are sometimes included in peer reviewed publications.
1338979
Articles. The definition of a credible source can change depending on the discipline, but in general, for academic writing, a credible source is one that is unbiased and is backed up with evidence. When writing a research paper, always use and cite credible sources.
354034
In that sense Quora is not reliable. But a good question can reliably get a wide range of responses, and that is nearly always interesting at least. But unless people are prepared to offer references or links to other reliable sources, much of the material posted as answers and discussion can be hard to verify.
1358781
Both the ACM and IEEE have their name attached to a host of conferences and journals. Some are known to be better than others, but I feel generally that any conference or journal with the ACM or IEEE brands attached are considered decent quality.
1050075
Within the scientific community, peer review has become an essential component of the academic writing process. It helps ensure that papers published in scientific journals answer meaningful research questions and draw accurate conclusions based on professionally executed experimentation.
1263720
Although peer-reviewed journals are always scholarly in nature, scholarly journals are not always peer-reviewed. Scholarly journals are research-focused, reporting the results of original research and experimentation.
948942
"Peer review" is the editorial process that scholarly articles go through before they are published in a journal. Since not all books go through the same editorial process before publication, most aren't peer reviewed. They can be still be good scholarly sources, though. ... Does a book count as an academic source?
537330
Scholarly journals are oftentimes peer reviewed or refereed. A peer-reviewed or refereed article has gone through a process where other scholars in the author's field or discipline critically assess a draft of the article. ... The vast majority of scholarly articles are peer reviewed.
98770
Books are indeed more reliable than the sources on the internet because they have been reviewed before publishing. The information of books stays for a long period while you may have the information on the internet changing every hour. Books have been proved more reliable but the internet is conventional.
876299
A reliable source is one that provides a thorough, well-reasoned theory, argument, discussion, etc. based on strong evidence. Scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or books -written by researchers for students and researchers. Original research, extensive bibliography.
1077041
In academic journals the articles submitted are reviewed by scholarly peers. This means that articles are submitted to the editor, and the editor sends the article to reviewers who read and evaluate the article. These reviewers are other scholars who are experts on the subject of the article.
63974
A vital, and often overlooked, aspect of peer review is that in the current system, peer reviewers are normally not paid for their work. They are, instead, rewarded non-financially by means of acknowledgment in journals, positions on editorial boards, free journal access, discounts on author fees, etc.
911525
Although arXiv is not peer reviewed, a collection of moderators for each area review the submissions; they may recategorize any that are deemed off-topic, or reject submissions that are not scientific papers, or sometimes for undisclosed reasons.
867118
Experts in peer review have suggested that "the two principal functions of peer review" are "filtering out incorrect or inadequate work and improving the accuracy and clarity of published reports." [2].
601953
A scholarly publication contains articles written by experts in a particular field. The primary audience of these articles is other experts. ... include a full bibliography of sources cited in the article. are often peer reviewed (refereed)