is no problem a sentence?
431762
Money is no problem. He had no problem with that. Alex was momentarily taken by surprise, but appeared to have no problem maintaining his erect status in the saddle. The purpose of his paper was to show that there is no problem if the axis is moved to the left.
1098071
There are also languages such as English, German and Swedish that only allow pro-drop within very strict stylistic conditions. A pro-sentence is a kind of pro-form and is therefore anaphoric. In English, yes, no and okay are common pro-sentences.
1187331
Use “no” after “there is” or “there are”. However, it's more common to use “isn't + a” for singular countable nouns, “isnt + any” for uncountable nouns and “aren't + any” for plural nouns. If you need more help with English grammar, see our page on some and any for more information.
1406905
No big deal. No big deal means, it's not a big problem, it's not anything to worry about. For example, if you've made a mistake at work and you tell your colleague, your colleague might say, “Don't worry, it's no big deal.” That means there's nothing to worry about.
1161706
When you use the phrase 'of course' you have to use a comma. It doesn't matter whether it is in the middle or at the beginning of a sentence. I'm completely sure that the first two sentences are right, but the last one seems wrong to me. Using 'of course' without commas can imply a refutation of prior skepticism.
893967
Normally, when you use not to form a negation, the word not is placed right after the declined part of the verb (that is, the part of the verb that changes if you change the subject). In your sentence, that is may, so the correct sentence is: They may not have apples.
314838
The problem is not that due to is not allowed at the beginning of a sentence. ... It's possible to start a sentence with a Due to …, but you have to make sure that the subject of the sentence is the noun or nominal phrase that is explained.
1166504
There is nothing wrong with starting sentences with “and,” “but,” or other similar conjunctions. You may, however, encounter people who mistakenly believe that starting a sentence with a conjunction is an error, so consider your audience when deciding to structure your sentences this way.
1270056
In the first sentence, there is no adjectival clause; it is a simple indicative/declarative sentence. ... Please note, your declarative portion is in the first part of these last two sentences, and even though it involves negation you do not use subjunctive - you say "no hay nadie" not "no haya nadie".
1179292
Yes you can start a sentence with nevertheless. It means, in spite of, notwithstanding. However, in a practical usage, you will probably be writing some content and as a contrary statement, you will start a new sentence with nevertheless.
83386
Simple sentences A simple sentence contains only one independent clause and no dependent clauses. When a simple sentence contains a conjunction, you might be tempted to insert a comma before the conjunction, as you do with a compound sentence. With a simple sentence, however, the general rule is to omit the comma.
551949
In fact, starting a sentence with a conjunction such as so, for, but can actually be totally acceptable. Most people don't care, but those who do, care a whole lot. So, why do many people hate seeing it? Well, the main reason is that it can result in fragmented sentences, which impede flow and readability.
1042205
Answer and Explanation: Yes, you can begin a sentence with the word 'currently'. It is an adverb of time that can be placed at the beginning of a sentence to describe when an...
1461075
2 Answers. The most common phrasing is simply using "possible". It isn't a prefix but it is rather clear: This is a possible solution to our bug problem.
777851
There is nothing wrong with starting sentences with “and,” “but,” or other similar conjunctions. ... Some readers especially dislike seeing the conjunctions or, nor, and yet at the beginning of a sentence. While it may not be an error, starting sentences with these words does sometimes seem melodramatic.
1446339
Phrase. no harm, no foul. Although technically a breach of some code or law may have occurred, there was no actual damage meriting punishment, apology or retribution. He parked in my space, but I was away at the time: no harm, no foul.
369260
Yes, you can start a sentence with whereas. Both following clauses as above must be in same voice. ... However, by contrast and on the other hand, must be used only to indicate contrast between two independent sentences separated by a full stop.