is exactly the same grammatically correct?
432032
However, at least the phrase "exactly the same" is grammatically correct. The phrase "exact same" is one of the more irritating phrases that is currently fashionable. Not only does it use words redundantly, but it is also wrong grammatically. The word "ain't" is also used very often.
1413314
No. A sentence should have at least subject and verb to call it a sentence. As such, the word 'yes' is not a complete sentence.
53178
Both forms are correct, but have slightly different meanings/contexts. The first is correct if "all" refers to "everything" (singular); the second is correct if "all" refers to an implied concrete set of things, as in "all (the widgets) are good".
558137
Both say exactly the same thing, but the grammatical structure is different, and thus it is have in one case and has in the other. In this sentence, the gerund selling is the subject, and that is what the verb must agree with, so the correct form would be has increased.
176779
Most people don't talk like that. To answer, "It's been going pretty good," is a bit stilted. More natural would be, "Okay," or "Not too bad," or "Just fine." Any of these can be followed with "You?" or "And you?" or "And with you?" So, something like, "Okay. Thanks for asking.
1300012
There's is a subject and a verb and that is all you need for a sentence. ... Yes, it has a subject and verb, so it is a sentence.
182473
Yes, they mean the exact same thing and either would be acceptable in your context. If I want to tell my friend I feel good with the plan, is it idiomatic to say these: 1) "I am OK with that." 2) "That is OK with me."
396312
In anaphora, repetition of same words is seen whereas, in parallelism, exact words are not repeated, but words or phrases identical in meaning, or similar in structure or sound are used. Writer repeats a word or phrase in the beginning of every clause in a sentence in anaphora to make it clear to the reader.
649869
The correct grammar in this case is "had woken". The sentence is in the past perfect tense using "had" and the correct participle for "to wake" is woken. So to be absolutely correct, the proper form is "I had just woken up...."
855918
Yes. But it is two separate words when used this way. It's one word as an adjective, eg my everyday sweater.
1131559
Re: Using "here" to start a sentence In speaking English this would be perfectly fine. "Here we go again!" and "Here comes the police!" are other common speaking English sentences.
1206271
Both of your sentences are correct, and they mean pretty much the same thing. But if you want to talk about a general, long-lasting worry, say I worry about you, and if you want to talk about a specific worry related to a specific event that's happening now (or happened recently), you can say I'm worried about you.
325024
I use "as is the case with", "with" means that the object compared are in the same place. In this case, "most major religions worldwide" are the same as "The Chatolic Church of Argentina. "As is the case with" function similarly as "like".
266124
This her is not strictly correct, but that isn't because it is the first word in the sentence, but rather because it is part of the subject. In informal English, I suppose this might be OK; but, according to convention, it should be she and her voice were truly a gift. You can obviously start a sentence with "her".
1119984
The short answer is yes; there is nothing grammatically wrong with starting a sentence with a conjunction like but, and, or or.
1052292
Of course it is, since “moreover” must come at the beginning of a sentence (as opposed to in the middle, after a comma). If that sentence is the first in a paragraph, well, there you are.
1106733
Most usually the plural verb “are” is correct because you are almost always talking about two subject nouns, not one. Example: “I like both tables, because both are quite nice.”