how are inductive and deductive arguments different?
438662
If the arguer believes that the truth of the premises definitely establishes the truth of the conclusion, then the argument is deductive. If the arguer believes that the truth of the premises provides only good reasons to believe the conclusion is probably true, then the argument is inductive.
420810
Inductive Reasoning. During the scientific process, deductive reasoning is used to reach a logical true conclusion. Another type of reasoning, inductive, is also used. ... It is important to learn the meaning of each type of reasoning so that proper logic can be identified.
19296
The main difference between inductive and deductive approaches to research is that whilst a deductive approach is aimed and testing theory, an inductive approach is concerned with the generation of new theory emerging from the data. ... The aim is to generate a new theory based on the data.
535279
The two major types of reasoning, deductive and inductive, refer to the process by which someone creates a conclusion as well as how they believe their conclusion to be true.
1304442
As nouns the difference between argument and nonargument is that argument is proof, reason, point while nonargument is that which is not an argument.
256433
Deductive arguments have unassailable conclusions assuming all the premises are true, but inductive arguments simply have some measure of probability that the argument is true—based on the strength of the argument and the evidence to support it.
1163288
They are deductive when they are used to test hypotheses derived from an existing theory and inductive when data is collected in order to develop a theory. ... Interviews and focus groups can also be used inductively or deductively , though they are more commonly used inductively.
819459
A deductive argument is said to be valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false. Otherwise, a deductive argument is said to be invalid. ... Otherwise, a deductive argument is unsound.
1079889
Validity and Soundness. A deductive argument is said to be valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false. ... In effect, an argument is valid if the truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion.
1197045
Inductive is a way to describe something that leads to something else, so when applied to reasoning it just means you collect information and draw conclusions from what you observe. Logical types may already be familiar with the word inductive as it relates to reasoning.
1298592
Inductive reasoning is the process of arriving at a conclusion based on a set of observations. ... Inductive reasoning is used in geometry in a similar way. One might observe that in a few given rectangles, the diagonals are congruent.
312812
A deductive argument is said to be valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false. ... A deductive argument is sound if and only if it is both valid, and all of its premises are actually true. Otherwise, a deductive argument is unsound.
373411
The inductive method starts with many observations of nature, with the goal of finding a few, powerful statements about how nature works (laws and theories). In the deductive method, logic is the authority. If a statement follows logically from the axioms of the system, it must be true.
349836
Inductive and deductive approaches to research. The main difference between inductive and deductive approaches to research is that whilst a deductive approach is aimed and testing theory, an inductive approach is concerned with the generation of new theory emerging from the data.
723685
Deductive reasoning applies general rules to make conclusions about specific cases. Inductive reasoning observes patterns in specific cases to infer conclusions about general rules.
136555
A valid argument is reasoning that is comprehensive on the foundation of logic or fact. ... Therefore, inductive reasoning moves from specific instances into a generalized conclusion, while deductive reasoning moves from generalized principles that are known to be true to a true and specific conclusion.
422562
Deductive reasoning is the process of reasoning from the general to the specific. ... Inductive reasoning is the process of reasoning from the specific to the general. Inductive reasoning is supported by inductive logic, for example: From specific propositions such as: This raven is a black bird.