are cars really bad for the environment?
150128
Car pollution is one of the major causes of global warming. Cars and trucks emit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, which contribute one-fifth of the United States' total global warming pollution. Greenhouse gases trap heat in the atmosphere, which causes worldwide temperatures to rise.
1417703
Worse, your new EV will someday need to be recycled, which also impacts the environment. If you include manufacturing and disposal, an EV produces about half the emissions as a normal car over the course of its life. It's greener than buying a new gas-guzzler, but may not be greener than buying a good used car.
1150775
Electric cars really are a greener option than fossil fuel vehicles. Electric cars are already greener than their fossil fuel counterparts in almost every part of the world today, according to researchers. They say electric vehicles are “a no-regret choice” even in places where power grids haven't gone fully green.
460974
Electric vehicles as they currently stand are far less polluting than their combustion engine counterparts. ... Electric vehicles are not a panacea but combined with greater deployment of renewables and the decarbonization of the electricity grid they offer a pathway to greatly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
498969
We found that in all states, EVs generate fewer greenhouse gasses than the average gasoline powered vehicle by at least 20%. ... Nationwide EVs are over 60% cleaner than the average gasoline powered vehicle.
1339381
'Electric cars aren't green' is a great bit of counter-intuitive headline bait, but it's bad maths. ... Electric cars have higher manufacturing emissions than normal cars. Electric cars also use electricity that has its own footprint.
378225
From the moment an electric car hits the street it emits no tailpipe emissions, but will still produce some degree of pollution from tyre and brake particles. The real environmental impact though, occurs before an electric car has left the factory floor.
454835
Are hybrid cars good for the environment? ... If you frequently do short journeys using just the battery power and charge it using 100% renewable electricity then yes, your hybrid is much better for the environment than a regular car as you'll be effectively emitting zero carbon into the atmosphere.
537496
Roads also carry oils from cars that travel across them, which have the potential to harm wildlife when they enter the environment. Pollution from roads extends beyond just chemicals, as light and noise pollution from roads can be detrimental as well.
345684
It's also true that most of an automobile's environmental impact, perhaps 80 to 90 percent, will be due to fuel consumption and emissions of air pollution and greenhouse gases that climate scientists say are driving global warming.
488690
Fuel-efficient cars help in reducing pollution and smog by at least 50%. By switching over to a hybrid car or one that does not require too much fuel, we are reducing our dependency on fossil fuels. Fuel-efficient cars need less fuel to run, so the amount of gas that we use up in commuting reduces drastically.
895652
The disadvantage of this car is that the main source of power that runs the engine is the fuel, not the electricity hence in terms of pollution it will not be 100% clean.
897490
Yes, dirt roads are bad for your car. ... Yes, dirt roads are bad for your car. I go by the rule that if there is a dirt road shortcut leading somewhere and the sealed roads leading to the same location add up to twice the distance it is still generally better to stick to the sealed roads and drive twice as far.
985342
Better for the environment Less pollution: By choosing to drive an EV you are helping to reduce harmful air pollution from exhaust emissions. ... Then, even if you recharge your EV from the grid, your greenhouse gas emissions are reduced.
970057
Higher CO2 emissions than diesel cars It is said that an EV can harm the environment by up to 28% more than conventional diesel engines.
312957
A new book argues for the environmental advantages of urban density. ... And in general, it seems obvious that cities are bad for the environment. They're dirty, noisy concentrators of people and pollution. They suck up natural resources from the countryside and spit back out vast quantities of waste, human and otherwise.
1345116
While trains are more energy efficient than automobiles, they do have their own effects on the environment, including producing nitrogen dioxide, carbon dioxide, and particulate matter that can contribute to air pollution and negative health effects.