Anyone try this with Glock 42 .380ACP Magazines?
1431411
I believe any glock mags will be too thick. The .380 mag is one of the thinner glock mags but this mag holder is designed to hold the true single stack design of a 1911 mag which is pretty thin.
782893
I would believe not. The holster is very specific for the shape of the gun loaded in it. There is a plastic guide inside that snuggly fits the firearm. Also note that the holster will not accomodate the magazine with the extended base attached, you have to use the other one.I have a Laserlyte sight on mine that works quite well - once broken in. (There is a slight conflict where a windage adjustment screw is on the site but after a short period, the leather conforms to the shape needed)
1889955
Put mine in today, not quite the mag drop I was hopping for. I have 22/45 lite, the mag still hangs a bit. Seems to be very little tolerances inside the mag well. Any one else having that issue ?
1593561
I bought mine for glock mags. I would think any double stack 9 or 40 mags. I will not fit glock 10mm or 45acp
719668
Nope. Use mine on Kimber 8 round 45 ACP. That is a single stack magazine. My 40 S&W; double stack mags will not fit.
829403
I got a new magazine out and played with it. Does it fit it like it probably should? No, but you can hold it in there and make it work.. It will not work as smooth and easy as on a larger mag, but it would be much easier than thumb cramps! Sorry, it took so long, but the mags just came in yesterday. Good luck
385711
It works great on my Sig 938 9 mm small mag so I would think it would work on a 380...but I dont have one to test!They seem to be a wll made product and not too pricey so I would buy it and see. I hate loading multiple mags by hand!!Peter
380625
Yes, it works well with P938 magazines, as well as with all my other guns through 45 ACP.
1959701
I seem to remember that there may be an issue with some Glock magazines. However, I do not have first hand knowledge, as I have only used mine on 9mm Taurus, .380 Taurus, and .380 CZ. All of these are double stack mags.
568566
I haven't but on my Saiga 223 with a 30 Rd mag it is too short. I'd insert your mag, take a tape measure and see how long your going to need and go from there, wish I would have.
2132347
I believe so. It works fine in small, thin magazines. It does not, however, work with the ruger lc380 which is a modified .9 mm, and since the ppk is specifically a .380 you should be fine.
2031386
I have a Glock 26 and this works great. I have both short 10 rd mags and Glock 19 mags with finger grips added for my 26 to have a full grip. They all work.
2210347
My handgun is fnx .45. Love the fit. Sides have almost ½" clearance for a wider frame. Barrel wise is 4.5" and is flush on bottom. My wife's 1911 was a bit to skinny and 5" barrel stuck out the bottomby an inch-ish. But its fully adjustable and well worth a shot. Not sure if magazines will fit the mag pouch. I think u will like it regardless.
450203
I don't know first hand but in theory I would say no. The model 42 in .380 is a single stack, slimmer model than traditional Glocks. I would check with Glock and see if they is a slide width difference.
1959702
Mostly, but according to their website, it doesn't load this one: "Glock G36 6rd .45 SS (Single Stack) (Beak will not come out of mag.)". Other than that, yes on Glock mags in supported calibers.
1168049
I don't have personal experience with those magazines, however my Glock .40 caliber magazines fit with room to spare.
828752
Wife and I have our CWP and we use it all the time. Fits great with the standard mag but will not fit with the extended mag.