Is the 55-250mm lens the STM version? If not, How much extra would it cost?
1434068
Thank you for your interest in our item. In regards to your inquiry, the 55-250mm lens is not the STM version. If you are looking to create a customized package then please contact us directly at 800-991-3350.
1753828
I have no idea.. but hey, may as well save $49 and go for the one with the lens (:
176998
You can have a look on canon website for the specs but the lens that comes with this kit is the stm version which produces pretty sharp images for kit lens. Again there is a ton of reviews out there if you research. This lens is obviously not going to be better than L lenses if you do a comparative. So it's really about what situation and output you are shooting for.
119682
I have also read that the 18-135 STM lens is a completely different optical design as well, with much higher edge to edge contrast, compared to the existing 18-135, which was a great all around piece of glass and definitely superior in quality to the kit lens. The 18-135 has also been called a good "walking around" lens in that it is very flexible in helping you get a wide range of shots.So if you want to do video and want the state of the art in 18-135, the STM is the way to go. As far as I can tell, the original 18-135 is NOT USM, so it is not a tradeoff in terms of STM/non-STM for this particular lens. If you were wanting a USM lens instead of STM or non-STM, that's another decision to make. I have also read that the 18-135 STM lens is a completely different optical design as well, with much higher edge to edge contrast, compared to the existing 18-135, which was a great all around piece of glass and definitely superior in quality to the kit lens. The 18-135 has also been called a good "walking around" lens in that it is very flexible in helping you get a wide range of shots.So if you want to do video and want the state of the art in 18-135, the STM is the way to go. As far as I can tell, the original 18-135 is NOT USM, so it is not a tradeoff in terms of... » Read More I have also read that the 18-135 STM lens is a completely different optical design as well, with much higher edge to edge contrast, compared to the existing 18-135, which was a great all around piece of glass and definitely superior in quality to the kit lens. The 18-135 has also been called a good "walking around" lens in that it is very flexible in helping you get a wide range of shots.So if you want to do video and want the state of the art in 18-135, the STM is the way to go. As far as I can tell, the original 18-135 is NOT USM, so it is not a tradeoff in terms of STM/non-STM for this particular lens. If you were wanting a USM lens instead of STM or non-STM, that's another decision to make. « Show Less
1661117
Greetings Georgina,Thank you for your interests in our item , and for contacting us regarding your concerns.We are pleased to inform you that the lens included in the kit is the original canon 18-55 StM Lens.As always, your satisfaction is our ultimate goal and we look forward to serving you again in the future. Should you have any additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us again.Best Regards,LindaCustomer Service TeamSuperFinds
773131
I would say get the 18-55 and use the $150 difference toward a 55-250 while you are starting out. You will probably want something longer than 135mm regardless, and depending on how far you go with your photography, there may come a point where none of the three lenses mentioned in this post is "good enough" anymore. ;)
119684
I have a complete review up of the 18-135 STM comparing it to the old 18-135 with video and photos, this might be helpful to someone determining if it is worth the money http://digital.photorecommendations.com/recs/2012/08/18-135-stm-detailed-review/ In my opinion the 18-135 package is the best value if you want the convenience of one lens.
1958590
I have both. For video, I recommend starting with the 18-135 STM. It provides a much greater zoom range. The difference between shooting at 18mm vs 24mm is bigger than it may sound. You can add other lenses later.
1332328
There is a silver version of the lens which can be a little less expensive. Or sony has a. 55-210mm lens which is much cheaper.
2152800
Great，I use the sigma 30mm f2.8 lens, it's just approximate 1 pound. I bought it cost $449 with 18-55 and sigma 30mm lens is 120 dollar~
2254945
Hey, thanks for the help. I sure will take a good look for a 50mm to add to the 18-250 because in addition to outdoors, everyone also has to shoot indoors and if it is good in low light that is a big plus.
1716089
Most people, especially newbies, get a better feel for zoom magnification by comparing a digital lens ratio to the old 35mm standard. In this case, assuming you are using the 55-250 on something in the Digital Rebel series, the maximum zoom of 250mm compares to about 400mm on a 35mm film camera, which is considered a "long zoom" lens. Your 18-55mm kit lens has a maximum 35mm equivelent of about 90mm--perfect for portraiture, and about 1/4 the maxium magnification of the 55-250. (I'm rounding off everything here.) This is about the maxium zoom that you can hand-hold, assuming bright conditions allow a fast shutter speed and image stabilization (IS) is turned on. A tripod would typically be needed for anything longer than a digital 250mm, and anything longer than 150mm when conditions are less than optimum. So, for maxium zoom with minimal hassle, the 55-250mm IS is, in my opinion, the most effective Canon zoom for the price.
1574801
Same here. It's pretty clear that the 18-135 STM movie kits are very, very scarce, if not non-existant. Lots of speculation about manufacturing problems, etc. Also just quite possible that Canon jumped the gun on allowing retailers to take orders without an adequate supply, and they didn't anticipate such high demand. One dealer in Hong Kong is claiming to offer them right now, and that's about it. You can't even buy the lens or the movie kit from Canon directly right now.
2005720
Thank you for your interest in our package deal! The lens in question is a Canon EF-S 18-135mm IS STM Lens which comes packaged with the camera body. If you have any further questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to contact our sales department at 800-991-3350 EST. We thank you for your time and consideration!
119683
Not just as an STM lens matched to an STM body, but for photography as well it's a wonderful lens if you can't afford an L lens. I'll go so far as to say that if I can only take one lens with me, without knowing what exactly I am going to shoot and how, this is that lens. It's tremendously versatile.
439345
The generic answer is ther the STM is quieter (supposed to be silent). It's great for video if you are shooting in auto focus mode.
119686
The STM (step motor) lens--hell yes. Even without the step motor it would be worth it. It's an excellent lens. Auto Focus is quick and virtually silent. I've taken shots in the dark, no flash, ISO 12800 with extremely low noise with this lens. It's amazing.