Review says bag isn't big enough for full frame. I'm getting Canon 6D (5.7 x 4.4 x 2.8), 70-200mm (6.8" high), 50mm, 17-35mm. Are these likely to fit?
1405808
I have a 7D with a Tamron 18-270 - both fit in this although a little snuggly in the internal travel bag but it works for my needs. I love the bag because it has a base that allows the camera to sit upright.
283282
Sure will, plenty of room for large bodies with large lenses. I have 5dmk3 w/grip and 70-200 and still have lots of room.
1452446
The Canon 7D Mk2 and 70-200L f2.8 really does NOT fit. It is possible to zip it closed, but it the camera and lens combination distorts the bag's shape. And it compresses the padding. Afraid I really must return it for the next size larger.
568951
probably be a little snug...depending on what lens you have on the camera..i would almost have to say no..but..i have two of these and dont really use either...if you have a 50 or 35 mm lens maybe...it is a nice bag well made and inexpensive but its 2 compartments top and bottom..good luck
1826881
I have a Canon T3i, the 50 mm and the 70-300, plus I use my Panasonic FZ200 and I sent this bag back, wouldn't hold it all. I've given up on a bag short of seeing it in person and trying it out myself.
1939843
Hello,My apologies about the late response. This bag is too small for your gear. It is not deep enough.Regards,RoozbehOC camera
2158044
Yeah It should fit no problem. The bag is smaller than you would think but it turned out to be the perfect size for me, (I have a Canon rebel) though I could only fit one other lens in the bag.
225429
I don't the dimensions of those particular lenses. Given their focal lengths, it seems they would be long. With one of the longer lenses attached to the camera, I don't think you would have a problem. I was surprised by how much I can fit in this bag. I really like it.
1441971
you have 8" depth, my 60D with a 5 1/2' lens/hood fits perfectly-if your lens is longer, you might want to look for a larger bag-extremely happy with mine-
1761815
Although I have not determined if that specific combination will fit, based on my ability to easily fit a Canon 5DIII with 17-40/4 attached, without extending the bag, I would say you should have no problem.
1249167
I have the same camera and lens kit (18-55) and a 75-300mm. I find everything fits better if I put the 75-300mm on the camera in the bag although it is a little snug. There is still room for one more lens or flash as well as a couple of filters, extra batteries etc. Honestly for the price I don't think you could get much better. I have another bag which I keep at home for any extras and will use this bag for taking the camera outdoors.
413720
I returned mine. It was not the bag that they advertised. different brand entirely and couldn't even fit my camera in the bag. It was more like a small purse. I'd advise looking elsewhere. Good luck!
1073137
No. At least not with a lens attached. It's not a bad bag, but the 1Dx doesn't fit into any bag well that I've found. The camera body alone takes up the entire camera compartment. You could take all the dividers out and fit it, but that defeats the purpose of a camera bag. My 70-200 2.8 zoom takes up the entire half of the bag as well (It has to lay flat, because the bag isn't high enough to hold it vertical). My 6D fits with a 24-70 2.8 L lens attached, and leaves room for other lenses or flash. However, the Canon 200 backpack holds the 1Dx with the 70-200 attached, the 24-70, 600EX-RT flash, 2x teleconver, and one more lens. Plus additional pockets. No. At least not with a lens attached. It's not a bad bag, but the 1Dx doesn't fit into any bag well that I've found. The camera body alone takes up the entire camera compartment. You could take all the dividers out and fit it, but that defeats the purpose of a camera bag. My 70-200 2.8 zoom takes up the entire half of the bag as well (It has to lay flat, because the bag isn't high enough to hold it vertical). My 6D fits with a 24-70 2.8 L lens attached, and leaves room for other lenses or flash. However, the Canon 200 backpack holds the 1Dx with the 70-200 attached, the 24-70, 600EX-RT... » Read More No. At least not with a lens attached. It's not a bad bag, but the 1Dx doesn't fit into any bag well that I've found. The camera body alone takes up the entire camera compartment. You could take all the dividers out and fit it, but that defeats the purpose of a camera bag. My 70-200 2.8 zoom takes up the entire half of the bag as well (It has to lay flat, because the bag isn't high enough to hold it vertical). My 6D fits with a 24-70 2.8 L lens attached, and leaves room for other lenses or flash. However, the Canon 200 backpack holds the 1Dx with the 70-200 attached, the 24-70, 600EX-RT flash, 2x teleconver, and one more lens. Plus additional pockets. « Show Less
2077864
My camera is 110.5mm W by 67.1mm H by 45.6mm D, (4.35" by 2.64" by 1.80") and it fits with some room to spare (roughly 5mm or 0.5"). Compare your camera dimensions to mine to see if yours will fit. I believe yours is slightly smaller so it should fit. My lens is a fixed lens with a lens cap. Two sides of the main bag open with a zipper. A small side bag also opens with a zipper and will hold small stuff like memory cards. There is also a belt loop but I don't use it. The bag is reasonably padded and will protect against small drops of a foot or two. I've used mine for over a year now.
559589
A 70D with an 18-135 lens should fit, but I doubt that a 200-550 will fit. In my opinion you should look for a bigger bag if you want it to fit all of your gear.
1469619
This is a mid-size DSLR, and you need to ask yourself a few questions before buying. First of all, how much gear are you going to be taking with you? You will probably be collecting lenses as time goes on, and you should consider whether you want them all, all the time, or if you want to just bring one or two and leave the rest at home. This will determine the size of the bag you purchase. Also, will you be traveling with your camera gear? If so, you might want to invest in one of the pricier Lowepro bags. There are three basic types to choose from: The basic bag, the messenger bag, and the backpack. You can get backpacks that will accommodate a small computer and even have straps for carrying your tripod. http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Deluxe-Backpack-200EG-Cameras/dp/B00009R6TA/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1419605185&sr=8-6&keywords=camera+bags http://www.amazon.com/UTG-Multi-functional-Tactical-Messenger-Bag/dp/B003TWZGRI/ref=sr_1_25?ie=UTF8&qid=1419605941&sr=8-25&keywords=camera+bags http://www.amazon.com/Lowepro-Rezo-110-Camera-Bag/dp/B000AQF4JG/ref=sr_1_51?ie=UTF8&qid=1419606166&sr=8-51&keywords=camera+bags There are many others to choose from. You might get a better idea of what kind of bag you want if you visit a local camera store and actually try a few on. One word of advice: your gear can get quite heavy as it accumulates, so make sure that whatever you get has a good strap. Also, get a new strap for your camera: http://www.amazon.com/Lowepro-34958-Transporter-Camera-Strap/dp/B000H7GFWS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419606679&sr=8-1&keywords=lowepro+camera+straps This is mine, and I love it - one of the best purchases I ever made.
100735
No! It would fit the 6D 24-70 attached with maybe a cell phone and keys, and that would be tight! 70-200 attached is way to big for this bag!