My original QT-110-B motor is 1320 RPM. Is there a big difference going with this 1400 RPM?
1437514
There is very little difference in RPM air exhaustion between 1320 and 1400. The 1400 RPM might have a different frame type that could infringe in the installation if there was a 1320 frame. Also, you could call the NuTone company for more technical data. Hope that helps.
1923391
Best thing is to look at your manual or look it up online. If your motor isn't designed to handle 11.1 lipo then stay away from it.
2132081
The RPM doesn't matter because it is a piece of crap. Don't buy it. You can't modify the speed, but most importantly it has absolutely NO torque. You can literally hold the arbor with your fingers to stop it from spinning.
1670185
Sure. It's 185 W, 115 V, 1.6 A, 60 Hz. Hope that helps! I've never had any trouble with this motor, either!
19670
I used this to replace my 14.5 hp motor. The only thing I had to change was the muffler. Check the shaft size and length, should be the same, vertical shaft motor.
1162243
This motor has been running 6 days a week since we got it, with no troubles. If the RPM is correct for your application, then it would be a good choice
1699554
The marking on the fan reads: MOTOR: TP 120V 1.1AThat would make it 132W at full power. There is no mention of consumption at lower power levels.
1586837
Hello. It depends on what vehicle size you are using it in. I used this as a replacement from the horrible 12T motor in the basic Stampede for my son. The difference is a little bit more speed and a little less torque. Example; the higher the turn motor = more speed and slightly less torque. The one thing I can verify, is that these motors are very reliable even if not broken in properly. Hope this helps!
353543
I would assume so. Mine works fine in the 1400 and they look similar to the 1430. Also there is a video showing installation:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01GjWhi2qaM
420185
I dunno, but it IS a pretty generic motor... just check the power & it should be fine.
1808772
Yes, I have mine starting a 110 motor. The switch is rated at 12 amps, so check the rating first on your motor to make sure it isn't pulling more than 12 amps.
245885
I'm not convinced the specs are not identical. Although i haven't found separate charts to prove that. It really sounds like marketing numbers 17HP @ 4944 and 15.01HP at 4500RPM might be identical at both products if you find a curve for both products.
2211767
What Darren said is spot on. It should be fine. 75 RPM is only 7.5% (0.075) faster than the one you have now. If you still want another opinion, I would drop by the local technical college/school and find the HVAC instructor. Ask him or her to make sure. And it would be free advice, too.
1486683
Reducing the motor voltage down by 12 volts will reduce the maximum RPM by 1/2 for this motor. Further reduction down to 9 volts will reduce it by 9/24 which is ,375 of maximum RPM. This motor is rated for around 3500 RPM. Therefore, a 9 volt operation will reduce the MAX RPM to 1313 RPM.
2211772
This motor is could be 7.5% faster than you old one. But 1000 RPM is a very odd and rare speed, most likely your old motor has the same number of windings as this one and is really moving at 1075 RPM, but the label says 1000. Common ratings for these fan motors are 1050, 1075 and 1100 RPM. I wouldn't worry too much about it, but I do recommend replacing the start capacitor with a new one (that is rated for this motor 5mfd/370V Capacitor) when replacing the motor.
1660407
On the tool itself, maximum rpm is printed as 1300, which is what I think is correct. The literature says 3000rpm. I compared speeds with the PS10, which is 600rpm max and the PS11. Looking at them both running next to each other, the PS11 is about twice the speed as the PS10. So 1300rpm is the more accurate max speed for the PS11. I bought the PS11 for drilling because of the faster speed. I can drill a pilot hole with the PS11 and use the PS10 to screw in the fastener. They work well for me using them in tandem. Both are fine tools.
1769335
Your motor is a higher service factory motor then this one, I would recommend using the B2842, higher service factory and energy efficient. http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0049TZYBS Barry