What is the difference between this lens and the 30mm f/1.4 DC HSM Lens? EX? ..DC?
1264648
This is the older version. The newest version is much sharper, focuses more accurately, and is definitely the lens you want to purchase.
1264649
That's a long answer that is best described here: http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2013/04/sigma-30mm-f1-4-dc-hsm-vs-sigma-30mm-f1-4-ex-dc In short, the DC HSM is the newer model with improvements in build quality and manual focusing.
1264650
Immage coating isthe diference, new lens is sharper and handels better the lens flaire
2152800
Great，I use the sigma 30mm f2.8 lens, it's just approximate 1 pound. I bought it cost $449 with 18-55 and sigma 30mm lens is 120 dollar~
1475535
This is a full frame lens. I've used it on my 7D, my Scarlet on 4K and 5K and on the Epic. It's a fantastic lens! You won't regret buying it.
2041779
There is at least one good comparison of the two lenses on youtube. Check out the videos and determine for yourself which lens fits your needs better. The f/1.4 is my first non-L lens; the add'l cost and weight made the f/1.2 less of a good fit for me.
916479
So despite it being a macro there's no problem with regular focusing?The 50mm 1.8 is really shoddy build quality, I think you're thinking of that. The 50mm 1.4 (3 times the price) is quite sturdy.I use the 28-105mm (the cheap one, not the L glass) I got this around the same time my friend got the 28-135, which looks like a better lens on the surface, yet he hated his and sold it. It's a much larger lens physically, while the 28-105 is really small, so that's something to consider. I also felt like mine focused better, although that wasn't an objective test. And it's half the price, which is nice. Something to consider So despite it being a macro there's no problem with regular focusing?The 50mm 1.8 is really shoddy build quality, I think you're thinking of that. The 50mm 1.4 (3 times the price) is quite sturdy.I use the 28-105mm (the cheap one, not the L glass) I got this around the same time my friend got the 28-135, which looks like a better lens on the surface, yet he hated his and sold it. It's a much larger lens physically, while the 28-105 is really small, so that's something to consider. I also felt like mine focused better, although that wasn't an objective test. And it's... » Read More So despite it being a macro there's no problem with regular focusing?The 50mm 1.8 is really shoddy build quality, I think you're thinking of that. The 50mm 1.4 (3 times the price) is quite sturdy.I use the 28-105mm (the cheap one, not the L glass) I got this around the same time my friend got the 28-135, which looks like a better lens on the surface, yet he hated his and sold it. It's a much larger lens physically, while the 28-105 is really small, so that's something to consider. I also felt like mine focused better, although that wasn't an objective test. And it's half the price, which is nice. Something to consider « Show Less
914061
The question is a little vague, but you are probably asking about differences between the H-VS014140 and the H-FS14140k. The FS is four years newer, 40% lighter than the VS and superior in most respects, although it is more expensive. The FS is an excellent lens.
346742
Its a faster lens and a different field of view. Two different lenses. The 25mm focuses faster in dim light. If you're trying to figure out which to buy, first figure out which FOV you prefer. Both are excellent. Also check out the oly 17mm, another fine lens if you are considering the 20mm, but with a slighty wider FOV, and focuses instantly.
1346889
I use the 50mm f/1.4 for almost everything. Although it is harder to get objects from far away, it is amazing what you can get out of it. The shallow depth of field is just top notch.
1000371
I have the DA 35/2.4. It is an amazing piece of glass for its price point. The 50/1.8 will give you tighter shots (better for portraits) with a better depth of field at f/1.8 (greater separation of your subject from the surrounding environment) and it will perform much better in low light situations thanks to the large aperture, leading to fewer noisy/blurry images.
1673724
Elona, the SX280HS has a 25mm wide angle. The HF-DC1 is good for only up to 28mm. You should get the HF-HD2 which will operate up to a 24mm wide angle. If you used the HF-HD1 you may get some lower lighting at the perimeter or edge of your photos.
2024383
This is a Macro Lens, if you have no need for Macro photography, then the 35mm f/2.4 is a better deal. This lens can shoot both regular and macro distant objects.
1234809
I prefer the 19mm lens because I wanted a WA lens and the 19 translates to a 27 mm in the A6000 body. The 30 is the equivalent of a 45 mm lens, too long for WA work. Both come with hood and pouch
346745
Good question. The 20mm 1.7 has a wider field of view. But ultimately I went with the 25mm because it's faster at 1.4 then the 20mm at 1.7. I've never personally compared the two but I've heard from people that the 25mm is also a lot sharper. It is an amazing lens!
591605
the 20mm lens is a bit slower to focus but considerably sharper, I used them both with Cross Country action shots, and the 20mm blew the 17mm out of the photographic water so to speak.
1580973
Michael, The one I got a few months back is the US warranty version. I have purchased quite a few Canon lenses on Amazon and they have all be US versions.
843976
You are absolutely right on that Scott. The 35 1.8 is also a Chinese made lens. Same here ... that 35 1.8 was the first lens on my D90 (which is made in Thailand) and is still my go-to prime lens. I feel like this 85 mm is definitely more a portrait lens given the effective focal length on the D90. It performs superbly tho. I think the only two Japanese lenses i own are Toknia's. I don't understand why its important where a lens is made tho? Is it about the QC??
1923724
I am not familiar with that lens, but I was not pleased with the results with the 75-300 lens I used with it. I got a halo effect and the pictures were hazy