Samsung HL67A750 OR Mitsubishi WD-73736: Any recommendations and why?
1419358
Here is a good discussion on these: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1043503
1676384
I've read great reviews about Onkyo as a brand for receivers. Although i have a samsung 46" that i'm simply loving right now. the Samsung HT-BD1250 sucked so bad that i'm reluctant to trust Samsung for audio gear. It sure looks good though the new system.The 5300 Onkyo looks more upgrade friendly. But the SR608 is overkill for me so i'm not even going to bother drooling over it.
1947743
Thanks. I will check out that issue. I have had the Samsung LN-T5265F for LESS THEN 4 MONTHS and have had 3 problems already. No picture, only sound. Lasts for a day then it seems fine again. Got a frimware update last time. Now, its wait a week for service man to show again and hope it works again tomorrow. Now I know why I have stayed away from anything Samsung for the last 30 years....
1367407
Kelli, I found this comparison on CNET.com - trustworthy site: http://reviews.cnet.com/home-theater-systems/samsung-ht-e6500w/4540-6740_7-35227915-4.html
1719596
I went with Samsung at the time because I had just purchased a Samsung TV and I thought, like everyone, that if a company's TV is good, the same thing can be said about the DVD. Well it's not like the Samsung was bad or anything, but it just wasn't as solidly built as the TV, so I sent it back and bought a Yamaha. Very sturdy, tough....and heavy!
1700259
I have a WD-73833 and it works perfectly. It's the same light for the 73734. Mine came from BULB WORLD through AMAZON. They even had free shipping! I read other people having problems with theirs from other places. Again, got mine in early 2013 and all is still good! VERY easy to replace too. It took me longer to pull the screen out from the wall than it was to replace the part. MAJOR difference in picture quality!
386475
Thanks for you answer ! So do you think i should pick the samsung D8000 or this LG tv ?
1270865
I am pretty sure I used the F7D4302 from toastman. Makes this device awesome.
1676380
Thanks, Tolik - you helped me decide- upgradability and the game modes are big things. The Samsung seemed to have more power but I've learned you can't really rely on what they say the wattage is. I haven't owned enough Samsung equipment in the past to know what to expect - the TV is great but a sound system is another story.Mark - thanks for the CD info - for some reason I thought I'd get even better sound with a dedicated player ... if you can give me the model # on the Kenwood I might be interested (with over 400 CDS, a changer is sweet.).Don
302407
I don't know how much help I can be but I'll give it a shot. I bought the Samsung because I own a Samsung LCD 46" bought in '08. I was quite happy with that TV so I stuck with the Samsung brand. I really think the 46" has a better picture than the 65" LED. Could be because of a consequential loss of picture clarity that comes with larger screen sizes. The UN65 has a dual core processor but if you're really into "smart," I recommend the quad core (more money of course). I subscribe to NFL game replays and they won't load well (and therefore can't view) with the dual core; I have to use my quad core computer. I think the UN has a really reasonable price, but you generally get what you pay for (as the old saying goes). Bottom line . . . I like the UN65 but, at the same time, I am a little disappointed. The only way you'll ever know is to look at them side-by-side and remember, showrooms do not have real-life broadcasts (in most instances) so when you get one home, your picture may not be a great as in the showroom. Hope this helps somewhat and good luck!
354921
I have been doing lot of research on LCD TVs and my observation is LN52B750 is best with internet, 240Hz and 2ms response time for almost same price as the other models. Red TOC some times distract your view compared to the Gray TOC in B750.Fry's in sunnyvale,CA has the B750 model for just $1704 until July 16th.
1241405
The difference is the the 737 has the 5G plush processing with the 12 bit color depth. Which is different than the 36 bit color display and the 6 color mixer, which both TV's have. The other has 6 or 8 bit depth. It makes the picture look nicer. The cheaper one does also have some sort of plush processing that smooths out standard def stuff, but this ones is better. The color bit depth is the main thing though. I'm getting the 737. I'm waiting until Christmas season starts though, to see if the price drops any more.
235177
I only evaluated to models with 3D; the Sharp and the Samsung UN75F6400. I thought they were very comparable in 3D mode and the price difference was obviously substantial, even though the Samsung is a 75-inch. I purchased the 70-inch Sharp in early August and we have watched a half-dozen movies in 3D since we received it and our family has been thoroughly impressed. Some movies, like Avatar, have some shadowing and clarity issues in the background imaging, but I was the only one of our family who really noticed it; probably because I was looking hard to evaluate the entire picture. The 3D features along with the internet / video streaming capability have been very good so far.
356979
Best Buy has the better Samsung version for only $999. The Samsung LN46B640 has more features like DLNA and more appealing grey bezel over red. Still has the black friday price of $999.
1118635
Do not hesitate to buy from Amazon, and do not hesitate buying the 750 if it is in your reach. Amazon is great and 750 Samsung is the absolute berries. I don't think there could be a better marriage of electronics and seller.D.King
1606327
Susan, I found a comparison at this site: http://2reviewed.com/samsung-dp700a3b-a02us-vs-samsung-dp700a3d-a01us-review/Hope this helpsGuy
1394417
Thanks for the reply. I went with the T260HD which was $50 less. When I get the TV I will post how I like it.