Is the resolution as good as it claims (1920X1080)?
1407606
No! the correct resolution is 1280 x 800.edit: http://www.kocaso.com/product_M1400.html
1407607
No! the correct resolution is 1280 x 800. edit: http://www.kocaso.com/product_M1400.html
1407608
Since I bought this tablet to display text only (song charts) it looks fine to me. My wife used it for the internet once and said it looked very good. What I know for sure is my internal speakers don't work and never did. I don't need them, but I'm sure would be important to other people. Also, the power input jack is VERY poorly designed. Overall the tablet is not high quality, but is fairly priced. If you want better quality, you should consider paying more for another brand. Hope this helped.
670372
Maybe but to say the truth I am quite desapointate by the resolution. It is un-readable. the cuality is very low so I guess if your screem if not good it will be worth. Good luck.
1027199
Ha... what? I'm assuming if their is a similar model to this laptop with a "better definition" it going to have a higher resolution like 1920 x 1080 as compared to the model i own is set to a lower resolution.
502174
It appears to have a native resolution of 800x600 which I found on another website.
473117
I'm using it on a Windows 7 Pro (64-bit) system right now. I'm happier with it since I upgrade from the on-board video to a stand-alone PCI-E video card with 2G of memory....the max resolution on this monitor was a stretch for the 4GB I had in the system. I had bought a set of 'computer cheaters' to fit over my bifocals....and haven't used them since I got this 27-incher. I LOVE it! It is bright, and it is Huge.
1334277
It's actually a 1920x1080p....the display is also LED backlit...the screen is REALLY nice; HD photos/ video looks amazing on this laptop.
1209066
That is above and beyond this frames resolution, just go by the pixels, you will be at full quality!
1781610
To my eyes no I think the resolution is fine for the size. I do have 70/20 vision though. If you won't be to have close to it you should be fine.
1438619
That's what I do and I'm happy with the resolution. Obviously, the quality of the TV's image is the limiting factor. Don't expect the picture to be the same as one of those beautiful (and expensive) Apple monitors. HDMI vs. FIREWIRE? I don't know the specs.
707044
Yes, but I wouldn't recommend it. The text is not as sharp as running native 1440p. You could tell, unless you can't. Which is good if you want to run it at a lower res. But I could tell and it was annoying too me.
800966
Your computer's resolution is only limited by the video card and the current monitor. 1920 x 1080 is really just a standard HDTV resolution (16:9) but most all widescreen *computer* (monitor) resolutions are 16:10, so 1920 x 1200 is perfectly normal and since you already have a 1920 wide res to start with, the option to expand to 1920 x 1200 *should* show up as soon as the new monitor is connected and detected by the computer. If it does not, then you might indeed have to upgrade your video card IF you really want to use the max res. For example, my original resolution was 1024 x 768 (4:3) on my previous monitor. With the T260HD, I was able to change to 1600 x 1200 (also 4:3) which, on the T260HD, does have "black bars" on the side. I suspect it is simply because my video card is outdated that I cannot get the max res and so I should get one that definitely has widescreen capabilities, but it has not been that important lately so I've just not done it yet. I hope that helps! XD PS. Also, when you have the max res of a 16:10 screen, ie 1920 x 1200, you will always have "black bars" on the top and bottom of proper 1080 (or any 16:9) footage when displayed correctly. That can bother some ppl, so it depends on what you want to use the monitor for mainly, ie if you plan to watch a lot of shows on it or just for computer stuff. Altho of course, depending on your media player (on the comp) or when you are watching tv, you will also have the options to crop or zoom the picture which can fill the screen if you don't mind losing the edges as long as you can escape the "black bars". Just some food for thought ;P
351756
Was only able to go up 1080P@60hz by default ... I am using a gtx 670 for the test.I did a custom resolution through nv control panel and it actually go up to 2560x1440 but it didn't look good at all. DVI and DisplayPort seem to have no issues with it.
1154716
Hello, The screen resolution for this model is 1920 X 1080. There wa typo in our listing and we are correcting it now. You will receive the Full HD model. Thank you, Jesse
479631
Yes I have tested this, Played UT2004 in all its 1080p glory, looks amaring, you might have to adjust for overscan though.
1859702
Sorry, not really sure on the resolution, but it is good quality. Hope this helps
567667
Connected to a computer the highest resolution it shows is 1024x728 Your only other option is 800x600. Its very clear and would be fine for internet/email usage from across the room as a monitor. If you want to use it with an HTPC make sure the HTPC software has the ability to adjust the aspect ratio to get things looking right.
137273
It says on the box High quality 2048 x 1536 resolution for crisp display. That's about all I can tell you. :)