what is the difference between the nd8 and the ndx8?
448921
Same thing.Actually the ND8 reduces 3 stops of light, and it's the most common ND filter purchased.
448922
Same thing. Actually the ND8 reduces 3 stops of light, and it's the most common ND filter purchased.
40482
Hello, between both editions is no difference in functinality. The difference is in the number of cameras and lenses which are supported in either edition. If you camera is on the list of supported optical modules in the Standard edition, you should be fine with it. To make sure that your equipment is supported, please check in advance on the DxO website: http://www.dxo.com/intl/photography/dxo-optics-pro/supported-equipment With kind regards, Heike Precht Support Team DxO Labs
226725
No, this is equivalent of DX only. On Sigma "DG" is equivalent to Nikon's "FX" (full frame), and "DC" is equivalent to Nikon's "DX" (crop frame).
646895
Actually it's the exact same sensor...the only difference there is that the 7D uses dual Digic IV processors where as the T2i only uses a single one (which affects the burst FPS). The sensor and processor are identical. It might not be *quite* as good at low-light only because using a single processor instead of 2 means there's not as much in-camera PP but it's not a huge difference (pictures looked very similar taken between the 7D and T2i).
984782
As I understand it the only difference is the bundle package. The camera is the same HX-300 in all cases. I love mine and am so pleased with what this camera can do.
659114
I don't know what the difference would be, I wasn't aware that there were various models. Sorry I couldn't be of assistance.
1247173
FX and DX refer to the size of the image sensor. FX is larger - about the size of a physical 35mm frame - and is thus capable of less noise and greater resolution, all other things being equal. But all other things are NOT equal - an FX camera costs considerably more than a comparable DX, and frankly, if you have to ask that question then you're probably not going to notice the difference. Modern DX cameras like the D7100 are capable of more than excellent results, and you would have to be a pro or shooting very specific and difficult subjects to really notice the difference.
1932920
There is only a subtle difference, but I would refer you to this article: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr;=&i;d=0ojG-t1EHvQC&oi;=fnd&pg;=PP1&dq;=understand+photographic+soft+box&ots;=qJ2bv6xJdh&si;g=DqJSzOHBfnXFlmKne7yB_7jmmyY#v=onepage&q;&f;=false
1172441
The only difference between the BD570 and the BD590 is that the BD590 has a built in 250GB hard drive in it. Other then that, the BD590 has a bigger foot print than the BD570. I own both the 570 and the 590. I haven't used the hard drive yet but you can store music, pictures, videos and movies on it. For a few dollars more it is worth it (for me) to get the BD590.
2236128
DX describes the crop that most digital SLRs have because their sensor is smaller than a piece of 35mm film. It is roughly 1.6x smaller. "Effective focal length" describes this difference for any particular lens focal length. FX is used to describe a digital SLR camera that has a sensor roughly the same size as a 35mm piece of film. DX and SX are also used to describe lenses, because some only make a circle of light large enough to cover a DX camera's small sensor. This makes the lenses lighter, cheaper, and has no disadvantage with a DX camera, but they don't cover a FX sensor.
2151803
I would say the key difference is probably the driver. The driver in the DX set will probably not go as far as the Champion disk, but it will be more forgiving in the sense of flying straight. Either product makes a great starter set, though I must say I am happy with the Champion set for its durable construction as it holds up against wear and tear, it has the advantage over the DX set.
1408132
The USD is the Newest verision; the main difference is the VR "Vibration Reduction" which cuts down camera shake. Without the VR, most of the time you need a tripod to take good clear photo's; having the VR cuts down the amount of needing a tripod. Hope that helps
577876
I believe the main difference is the dynamic contrast ratio 8,000,000:1 vs. 12,000,000:1
692071
the dx unless you plan on moving up to a full frame camera in the future. if you're not going to go full frame don't waste the $ on the fx lens. I have both these lenses, the dx I got first when I first started out, then recently the fx when I got a full frame camera. I've used the fx version on my d7000 (dx body) and honestly I see no real difference between the dx and fx lens on a dx body. even after pixel peeping quite a bit I was really at a loss as to which one was better, they both looked really good.
381103
they do not have any difference... both do not have a digital display ... only the oldest model has.
1841960
It is a matter of personal taste, and of situational need. The EA8 is about 7% brighter than the EA8W, and has a slightly longer throw (beam distance). But the EA8W is better in foggy or rainy conditions because it does not cause as much light to be reflected back at the user, therefore providing better visibility under those conditions. And the EA8W provides (for many people) a more accurate color rendering, much like sunlight, while the EA8 is a brighter but colder light and tends (for many people) to cause colors to "wash out" a bit. I personally have the EA4 (4xAA), which is the "little brother" of the EA8, and so far I have not missed having the EA4W (neutral white) version.
1659012
The difference between DK36 and the DK 39 is that the DK36 is meant to be use only for Xperia Z smartphone while the new DK39 is use for smartphone and Xperia tablet. Overall if you don't own a Xperia tablet, go get the DK36. If you own or plan on getting the Xperia tablet, than get the DK39 since it will support both tablet and smartphone.