How does the 3000 compare with the 300? I noticed that the Comparison chart listed the Series 100; 200; then 3000; 4000, etc. Thank you
1409495
I don't know the difference. If you are wanting cutting tools, stay away fromantic dremel. The sanding discs and other attachments wear out too quickly and are way to expensive.
1409496
I believe the 3000 replaces the 300. They have about the same rpm range. The 3000 has a newer design, probably some features I can't really think of right not but mostly the same
1409497
I can't do a comparision, all I have is the 3000. However, if you really want to see, feel and make a determination visit the Home Depo store. They have a fine display of the Dremel Versatile Tool Systems. Or, call the company, for a free Dremel DVD 1-800-437-3635; their web site www.dremel.com may help as well.
1409498
I believe the 3000 replaces the 300.They have about the same rpm range. The 3000 has a newer design, probably some features I can't really think of right not but mostly the same
219630
In asking other people when I was shopping I found that the 300 is the latest model. Some said the 100 took too long to charge devices. Good Luck.
1000795
I hope someone replies to this post cuz I have the same question. I'm eyeing the 205 and 305 too. I'm not a marathoner or bike enthusiast, just a runner who might like the HR function added to my data points. I wonder how many use the HR monitor with the 305 consistently or does it end up in a drawer after a while.
1567468
230 is just suggested retail. Many places will sell it cheaper. It is the same item. The only little difference there might be is this might be last years model. They changed the logo on the newest one, that's the only difference. Don't worry
1140571
I've heard that motionbased.com adjusts the elevation readings now to reflect more accurate elevations. I don't own one yet, but am looking to buying one and have heard this from a few friends who own the 305. This, from what I understand, is the 305's biggest weakness! However, I still want one above any other of its kind...
1643488
I got the 200... It had better features and a very nice design. This unit is great for the price, you get the same features of units that cost in the 800 to 1000.00 range. It's worth getting. The units very lite, designed well, (looks cool) and has been extremely actuate for me, the gps function is also very handy in finding your way back to a good spot.
1790370
I owned the 70-300VR for a year and sold it. I bought the 55-200VR and still have it after a year.For me, an amateur photographer of general life pictures, I did not like the size and weight of the 70-300. I ended up not using it much and therefore decided to sell it. However, the pictures were beautiful. In it's favor are the bokeh and contrast. Otherwise, I find the little brother 55-200 more suitable for me hands down. I prefer the range, light weight, low price, and overall picture quality was more than good enough. If I were to do primarily bugs, birds type, then the 70-300 would be more suited. I owned the 70-300VR for a year and sold it. I bought the 55-200VR and still have it after a year.For me, an amateur photographer of general life pictures, I did not like the size and weight of the 70-300. I ended up not using it much and therefore decided to sell it. However, the pictures were beautiful. In it's favor are the bokeh and contrast. Otherwise, I find the little brother 55-200 more suitable for me hands down. I prefer the range, light weight, low price, and overall picture quality was more than good enough. If I were to do primarily bugs, birds type, then the 70-300... » Read More I owned the 70-300VR for a year and sold it. I bought the 55-200VR and still have it after a year.For me, an amateur photographer of general life pictures, I did not like the size and weight of the 70-300. I ended up not using it much and therefore decided to sell it. However, the pictures were beautiful. In it's favor are the bokeh and contrast. Otherwise, I find the little brother 55-200 more suitable for me hands down. I prefer the range, light weight, low price, and overall picture quality was more than good enough. If I were to do primarily bugs, birds type, then the 70-300 would be more suited. « Show Less
590149
I have the 100 and the 300 and the charger looks the same to me. But there could be a difference between them. Sorry I can't give you a better answer.
2105738
The only difference is the 36300 doesn't have an outside thermometer. And the weight difference would be the temperature probe and the wiring (although I just looked at the product pages and it seems like the listed weights are swapped (although the listed weights and measurements on Amazon are almost always wrong)). I got the 36500 and I'm pleased with it except for the fact that I think it should have an inside thermometer also (though I haven't seen any that do) and the fact that the map lights are incandescent rather than LED (and I just bought it last winter, that's very strange in this age of everything going LED), but they are easily changeable to LED (it's just a matter of finding a decent led replacement bulb (most of them are cheap china junk)).
55111
The PSP model 3001 is a 3000. All models have a one after them for some odd reason. Like the 2000 models it will have say 2001.
1230854
If the 300 came with these pedals, I would have bought it. Another major deciding factor was that I got this one around Christmas for only $50 more than the 300. Had it been full price i would have bought the 300 and purchased these pedals(if that's possible).. Hope this helped
722138
Hi all,A quick update. I am an engineer and I pay attention to Specs but when it comes to the SR100 vs SR300, I hands down tried both. The quality of the SR100 is far far much better. Yes it is that much diffrent. The colors are more vivid, smooth I dont see any boxyness. Also it is grainy. The only advantage is the still pictures are better then the SR100 but as far as video, there is no comparision. The SR100 is much better in low light...I dont see grains but the SR300 is obvious. I dont belive the specs about the SR300. If Sony does not come with a replacement, I may just sell this on ebay and buy a SR100 for video and use my digital camera for stills. Frank KalkattawiParis, France(Moved) Hi all,A quick update. I am an engineer and I pay attention to Specs but when it comes to the SR100 vs SR300, I hands down tried both. The quality of the SR100 is far far much better. Yes it is that much diffrent. The colors are more vivid, smooth I dont see any boxyness. Also it is grainy. The only advantage is the still pictures are better then the SR100 but as far as video, there is no comparision. The SR100 is much better in low light...I dont see grains but the SR300 is obvious. I dont belive the specs about the SR300. If Sony does not come with a replacement, I may just sell... » Read More Hi all,A quick update. I am an engineer and I pay attention to Specs but when it comes to the SR100 vs SR300, I hands down tried both. The quality of the SR100 is far far much better. Yes it is that much diffrent. The colors are more vivid, smooth I dont see any boxyness. Also it is grainy. The only advantage is the still pictures are better then the SR100 but as far as video, there is no comparision. The SR100 is much better in low light...I dont see grains but the SR300 is obvious. I dont belive the specs about the SR300. If Sony does not come with a replacement, I may just sell this on ebay and buy a SR100 for video and use my digital camera for stills. Frank KalkattawiParis, France(Moved) « Show Less
1071779
Here are some reviews of both. http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/100HS/100HSA.HTMhttp://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/300HS/300HSA.HTMI recently had to make the same decision, and tried out both the 300HS and 100HS. The image with the 100HS was sharper every time. Colors were pretty much the same, both seemed slightly saturated (easy fix with settings), but fairly accurate IMO.I wouldn't spend the extra $50 for a bit more zoom, especially at the cost of image quality.
2061357
thanks for the info. Do you think the sound quality is as good on the 325 as the 350? Obviously the size of the unit is bigger on the 325 but I was wondering if this is the only difference?
2096573
I have the 18-200 and have enjoyed it. If you are absolutely sure you will never go FX, the 18-200 is a good choice. For less money, I would prefer the 28-300 instead of 18-300, if you ever want to move to FX.
2281278
The main difference I see is the V500 has a higher scan resolution (6400x9600) as opposed to the V300's 4800x9600 res. Also, the V300 does not have Digital ICE capabilities which the V500 has. Personally, I've been using the V500 for archiving 35mm negatives, and not having the ICE technology for removing scratches, dust, and other imperfections IS A DEAL BREAKER! You have no idea how much time you'll save by using ICE to clean up those old negatives instead of doing touching them up by hand. ICE technology works very well! The scanning software Epson ships with their scanners is very clunky and quirky to say the least, but it gets the job done. I see the V300 as a document scanner with limited photo scanning capabilities. The V500 is definitely the best photo scanner bang for the buck bar none!
529028
Yes, you are right. I just noticed my question was cut short...sorry.I am glad to hear your enjoying the 620 and really appreciate your information. I always try to research as much as I can and your insight helps a ton. Thanks!By the way, if you have a second, can you re-read my post, because my question was in regards to checking ink levels.