Good zoom lens for the Pentax D200? Hello,The Pentax D200 is my first DSLR. I purchased the camera kit with the 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens and also purchased the Pentax DA 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3. I was hoping to get a high zoom with the lens, but unfortunately it's not quite what I was hoping for. I'm not very knowledgeable on lenses so if anyone could point me in the right direction for a nice high powered zoom, I would greatly appreciate it. I also noticed that the Pentax DA 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 lens makes things farther away than they appear with the naked eye. Why is that? Thanks so much! Good zoom lens for the Pentax D200? Hello,The Pentax D200 is my first DSLR. I purchased the camera kit with the 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens and also purchased the Pentax DA 18-250mm... » Read More Good zoom lens for the Pentax D200? Hello,The Pentax D200 is my first DSLR. I purchased the camera kit with the 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens and also purchased the Pentax DA 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3. I was hoping to get a high zoom with the lens, but unfortunately it's not quite what I was hoping for. I'm not very knowledgeable on lenses so if anyone could point me in the right direction for a nice high powered zoom, I would greatly appreciate it. I also noticed that the Pentax DA 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 lens makes things farther away than they appear with the naked eye. Why is that? Thanks so much! « Show Less
1438168
The 18-250 is the highest powered zoom currently on the market for Pentax DSLRs, at 13.9X. If you want higher magnification, look for lens with greater than 250mm at the long end. Several popular lens include the Tamron and Sigma 70-300, the Pentax 55-300, and if you have the cash, the Bigma 50-500. Each has its own strengths and weaknesses, which you can research on dpreview.com50mm is about what the naked eye sees. So anything less than 50mm will appear smaller, and further away. Wide angle lens can go as low as 10mm to capture as much as possible.
801145
I would also like to hear about this from someone who knows. I was planning on getting the kit lens and buying the 70-300mm VR Nikkor lens with it thinking that the VR technology makes them superior, but most people are very unimpressed with the kit lens. One reviewer was raving about Sigma lenses for the D90, such as Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 AF APO DG OS HSM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras. I am now seriously rethinking my lens purchase plan.
1119155
Dear Lawrence, I have this lens... it is perfect to some of my needs. My camera is a Nikon D5100. I checked in this forum and it seems to be compatible with D5000 either. I don't know about D200. http://www.nikonians.org/forums/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum;=312&topic;_id=37I hope it can be useful for you. Regards, Jansen Sena
928326
If you meant a D600, then that's a great lens and I'd definitely recommend it. Also look at the 14-24 if that's within your budget and you don't need to use filters.If you actually meant D60, then this lens would not make sense to use on your camera unless you're planning to move to full frame soon. 16mm isn't very wide on DX and f4 isn't anything special. If you are going to stick with a Dx sized sensor long-term, then I would look at the new Sigma 18-35 for a similar zoom range with the huge bonus of a 1.8 aperture. The 17-55 Nikon is also good but it's getting old. If you're looking for an ultrawide for DX, take a look at the Tokina 11-16 or Nikon 10-24. If you meant a D600, then that's a great lens and I'd definitely recommend it. Also look at the 14-24 if that's within your budget and you don't need to use filters.If you actually meant D60, then this lens would not make sense to use on your camera unless you're planning to move to full frame soon. 16mm isn't very wide on DX and f4 isn't anything special. If you are going to stick with a Dx sized sensor long-term, then I would look at the new Sigma 18-35 for a similar zoom range with the huge bonus of a 1.8 aperture. The 17-55 Nikon is also good but it's getting old. If you're... » Read More If you meant a D600, then that's a great lens and I'd definitely recommend it. Also look at the 14-24 if that's within your budget and you don't need to use filters.If you actually meant D60, then this lens would not make sense to use on your camera unless you're planning to move to full frame soon. 16mm isn't very wide on DX and f4 isn't anything special. If you are going to stick with a Dx sized sensor long-term, then I would look at the new Sigma 18-35 for a similar zoom range with the huge bonus of a 1.8 aperture. The 17-55 Nikon is also good but it's getting old. If you're looking for an ultrawide for DX, take a look at the Tokina 11-16 or Nikon 10-24. « Show Less
667266
If you want to get some details on the different pentax lenses check out http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-50mm-fa-da-dfa-lens-comparison/design-and-handling.html# . Out of the lenses you mentioned the DA 50 f1.8 is the only one that I have. It's a great, easy to use, and inexpensive lens. I've heard great things about the 35mm that you mentioned. It's 4 times the price of the DA 50mm f1.8, so it better be good! For user reviews check out this link http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/ . Also don't be afraid to ask questions on the forum, the folks there are extremely helpful and don't mind sharing information. Good luck If you want to get some details on the different pentax lenses check out http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-50mm-fa-da-dfa-lens-comparison/design-and-handling.html# . Out of the lenses you mentioned the DA 50 f1.8 is the only one that I have. It's a great, easy to use, and inexpensive lens. I've heard great things about the 35mm that you mentioned. It's 4 times the price of the DA 50mm f1.8, so it better be good! For user reviews check out this link http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/ . Also don't be afraid to ask questions on the forum, the folks there are extremely... » Read More If you want to get some details on the different pentax lenses check out http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-50mm-fa-da-dfa-lens-comparison/design-and-handling.html# . Out of the lenses you mentioned the DA 50 f1.8 is the only one that I have. It's a great, easy to use, and inexpensive lens. I've heard great things about the 35mm that you mentioned. It's 4 times the price of the DA 50mm f1.8, so it better be good! For user reviews check out this link http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/ . Also don't be afraid to ask questions on the forum, the folks there are extremely helpful and don't mind sharing information. Good luck « Show Less
371933
Yes, the D200 utilizes the DX format sensor thus the DX 18-200 lens will work great!
839198
You would get a lot more bang for fewer bucks by replacing the D-90 body (12.4 mpix DX format) with a new D-610 (24.3 mpix FX format) if your 200 mm lens is in that format also, i.e., if it is the 70-200 FX zoom. Plus, HD video and faster internal processing.
1908236
My DP1m seemed to be essentially as sharp as it could be around f5.6, from center to edge. It is never as sharp on the edge as the center, nor quite as good of a performer as the DP2m in that regard, but I concur with the previous answer that it is of little concern in real-world usage. I used it without qualms, at any aperture, to be honest (simply choose the aperture you require for DoF and shoot). It's an excellent lens.
183451
I shoot the same subjects and have been very pleased with the 18-250mm zoom. If you want a little more reach get the 55-300mm in place of the 18-250. With that choice I would then add the 18-55mm. I'm assuming you want to stay with Pentax brand. Neither zoom is "cheap" but then you get what you pay for. I chose the 18-250 because I hand hold the camera most of the time and here in the Pacific NW the light levels in the winter are pretty low. I doubt if I maxed out the 300mm (450mm equivalent) would I get a sharp image. Love the K20D by the way.
150331
Deepak, I am currently using this lens on a Nikon D300 with 12.3 megapixels. I own several Nikkor lenses, ranging from wide angle to 300mm. This 18-200 is the best of all. Since receiving it, I have not taken it off the D300. I use it exclusively. It is a great lens. The VR feature is also fantastic. Low light shots come out great. I would highly recommend this lens for high megapixel cameras. It works great on my D300. I think you will be very happy once you use it too.
19799
Reasonably good. Yes it is. I guess Pentax as a brand suffers in the lens department. Cameras are good. For lenses you have very limited options.
1351164
I used the 55-200mm/4-5.6 lens on my DX format D200 and thought that it was an excellent lens. There are two things that would make me prefer it to the excellent 24-85mm/3.5-5.6 in your case. First, you would probably be using the lens at longer focal lengths, in which case both lenses would be operating at f/4.5 to f/5.6, so there is no advantage to having the 24-85mm in terms of low light capability. Second, the 24-85mm is designed for the FX format, so you'd be paying for a wider field lens than you need on a DX camera. If you ever go to FX format, the 24-85mm/3.5-5.6 is a real jewel to own.
1642994
Yes, it will work well with your D200. The downside to the lens is its weight, it's a very heavy lens, best used with a tripod. With such a wide range, it's tempting to use it as an everyday lens, but the weight limits its usefulness
1332015
No. The Pentax K1000 is not a DSLR camera. The D stands for digital camera and the pentax is a film camera. You're better off looking into the Canon Rebel eos. It's DSLR and good for beginners.
767675
This lens and the Pentax 18-55 II are not really comparable. The 18-55 is a zoom, and the DA 50mm f1.8 is a prime, meaning, of course, no zoom. It's fixed at 50mm. Also, the 18-55 II will only open up to f3.5, so you really won't get the lovely narrow depth of field that you get with the 50mm f1.8, which is what makes this lens so attractive and seductive. So I guess it depends on what you want. The 18-55 would make a better walk-around utility lens. The 50mm f1.8 is a specialized, portrait lens that will give you a fantastically blurred background when shooting subjects up close. Personally, I think you should have both in your lens collection. This lens and the Pentax 18-55 II are not really comparable. The 18-55 is a zoom, and the DA 50mm f1.8 is a prime, meaning, of course, no zoom. It's fixed at 50mm. Also, the 18-55 II will only open up to f3.5, so you really won't get the lovely narrow depth of field that you get with the 50mm f1.8, which is what makes this lens so attractive and seductive. So I guess it depends on what you want. The 18-55 would make a better walk-around utility lens. The 50mm f1.8 is a specialized, portrait lens that will give you a fantastically blurred background when shooting subjects up close.... » Read More This lens and the Pentax 18-55 II are not really comparable. The 18-55 is a zoom, and the DA 50mm f1.8 is a prime, meaning, of course, no zoom. It's fixed at 50mm. Also, the 18-55 II will only open up to f3.5, so you really won't get the lovely narrow depth of field that you get with the 50mm f1.8, which is what makes this lens so attractive and seductive. So I guess it depends on what you want. The 18-55 would make a better walk-around utility lens. The 50mm f1.8 is a specialized, portrait lens that will give you a fantastically blurred background when shooting subjects up close. Personally, I think you should have both in your lens collection. « Show Less
1244269
Dear friends. I am biased Pentax because I really love this camera. I bought the kit from Pentax K30 with a 18-55 and a 70-200. The set is sensational. I have taken many pictures in my trips to Portugal. Obviously there are better lenses and more optical resources, however this 70-200 mm in the kit fulfills its role.
606484
I'm so glad there's something posted here - this is one of the lenses I'm considering getting my husband for Christmas. He has the Sigma 50-200mm lens right now and in my experience with it, it hasn't been too bad. Should he be happy with the 18-200?