Do you recommend 23 or 25 mm, what would be the difference?
1414946
Difference in rolling resistance and comfortably more information at http://forums.roadbikereview.com/beginners-corner/23mm-25mm-tires-237167.html
1414947
Most would probably say weight. I ride with a 25 on the rear and 23 on front. I would next time just do a 25 or 23 on both. If your a hard core racer go smaller. If your like me and just ride and commute for fun, 25 is good. A 25 provides a little more contact on turns.
1414948
For me, 25mm provides a better ride. I also inflate them to a lower psi than what is recommended. I run the rear tire at 90 psi and the front at 90psi. I think that set up provides me a better ride especially on roads that have been chip sealed. Mike
1414949
I use the 25mm for a more supple ride and according to the latest research a wider tire (within limits) has less rolling resistance. The weight isn't as much a factor for me and I run Mr. Tuffy ultra-light tire liners in these for added protection because flats just ruin a good ride.
1414950
For me, 25th provides a better ride. I also inflate them to a lower psi than what is recommended. I run the rear tire at 90 psi and the front at 90psi. I think that set up provides me a better ride especially on roads that have been chip sealed. Mike
1414951
23mm is pretty much a race width. Even more Tour De France riders are moving to extra width at 25mm. It's a bit more comfortable with negligible weight differences. I even prefer the 28mm width for rougher road rides and commuting.
246237
Hello, I am not certain what difference there is in the mm size aside from the depth it can go into your skin. I do advise you start at 1.5 and work your way up unless you can tolerate the pain and allow it to penetrate deeper which will result in a better outcome anyway.
397356
The 23s are thinner, lighter (because they are thinner), and a little faster. 25s are 2mm greater in diameter, so they are a little heavier and better on rough roads. I have the 25s for training and 23s for racing. These are great tires if you don't like flats. Probably not the fastest tire around, but for me they are fine.
1173524
I've owned both, heres my opinion: the 24-105mm is best for a travel lens when you dont wanna be annoyed by changing lenses. The 24mm f/2.8 is more if you want the best sharpness and contrast with less destortion. It is in the pro league of prime lenses. The zoom lens is just a good but not great all arounder that does a lot though.
27754
I prefer 50s because it looks more expensive and elegant than the 25. (Doesn't look like a toy) but other than that they are almost same size and works the same. The shape of 50s is also more square. It really comes down to personal preference.
285796
Yes they are 25mm. Much better ride and handling than 23mm. Really good tire
675161
I think a 20 or 24 would be fine. I live on a pond and we have 24 inch ones.
1184429
if you need to fit 23 mm, instead of 13mm; I suggest you call the company for compatability...
933396
The main difference on the 24-70 2.8 will be the 24mm setting compared to the 35mm setting on the old lens. You can take a much wider shot with the new lens. In addition, the 24-70 is a "G" type lens which means there is no aperture ring on the lens. Aperture must be controlled through a compatible camera. The 24-70 2.8 is more expensive. The macro focusing gets a little closer on the 35-70 (.91ft) as opposed to 1.2 ft with the 24-70.
1488251
Not sure what you mean by 20/25 or 25/32. but I guess that is determined on your riding terrain and what is more comfortable for you.
155151
Use the .25 as the medium and purchase additional thread at your hobby shop size .33mm as the small
346745
Good question. The 20mm 1.7 has a wider field of view. But ultimately I went with the 25mm because it's faster at 1.4 then the 20mm at 1.7. I've never personally compared the two but I've heard from people that the 25mm is also a lot sharper. It is an amazing lens!
590448
I would use the .40, .41 caliber one. It is hoppe's item number 24003. (25.4 millimeters equals 1 inch). .40 times 25.4 equals 10.16 mm.
489202
I'd say no. Myself i;ve never heard of a 23.5x23.5 size. I think 24x24 would be the proper size.
942878
In my experience, you'll get very much the same pic with the 10-24 between 18-24mm as you would with the 18-105. That's one reason I sold it. The 10-24 should be shot at 10mm, which is why you're buying it in the first place and why it costs so much (Just my opinion of course). http://www.amazon.com/review/R1HCPRMG89GYZO/ref=cm_cr_dp_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN;=B0026FCKC8&nodeID;=502394&tag;=&linkCode;=
49807
For the excercises I use a 65 mm. I bought a 75 mm to sit at my desk at work. I needed more height for that. I'm 5'2 �
1701626
700 by 23 or 25 probably. Do you know how wide you need your tire to be? 23 is the skinniest, 25 is slightly larger. Riding on plain road, 23 is most popular. If you race on road, you should probably have 23 but 25 doesn't make much difference. 23 might be faster slightly. I hope this answers it. Your question is not to clear sorry.