15mm /f2.8 fisheye: Does this lense make sense for a Digital Rebel XT user?
1433604
Yes it does but for 1.6 crop it even makes more sense to buy Bielorussian lens called Peleng 8mm It's a full manual lens but very good one
1820412
The 1.8 is similar in build quality to the kit lens--probably a slight bit below the XSI kit. If you're happy with the kit lens, you should be happy with the 1.8.There's a reason why 93% of the reviews here are 4 or 5 stars--this lens takes great pictures. For $80, what do you have to lose?
547718
Kristy, I agree in principal with both of the other commenters. However, I'm not sure those answers completely address your situation. As not to compare apples to oranges, are you talking specifically about zooms or fixed lens? If you are interested in getting a zoom type lens, especially one f2.8 or faster, you are talking about some sizable dollars. Zoom range, low light capabilities, absence of distortion, cost constrictions and your personal standards create a host of considerations. But, comparing a digital fixed lenses specs to a digital zoom lens specs is not a fair caparison at all.
241544
I have the 85 f1.8D and 35 f2D and they are fantastic. The two lenses you mention should be even better. The 35 is such a versatile focal length, I have been using as my all purpose lens.
382298
The 2.8 gives you slightly better VR and one more stop over the f4. You could always take advantage of Amazon's 30 day return policy and try the f4. If it works well for you, keep it. If not, return it for the f2.8 model. Your current lens has NO VR, so either lens would be a big improvement.
2256737
I have purchased other Fuji XF lenses, and i keep the 23mm lens on there at all times. It's my favorite lens. Others are smaller, but none feel or work as well as the 23. It's tack sharp even at 1.4. I would make this my lone prime, if that was your option.
1329593
This is a good quality lens. Yes you can preserve the original f2.8. As regards image quality I don't have a laboratory to measure such things but there certainly isn't the obvious problem with distortion or focus out near the edges that you see with cheaper lenses. I'm sorry I can't be more specific.
1333594
I think you would be very happy with it. Only problem is is what ever you see through the lens is what you get. Meaning you can not make your field of vision larger nor smaller. I think fore something like the sky you would do better with a lens that has a zoom on it. Good luck and have fun. Something I would love to be able to do.
399584
It was designed for MiniDV digital optical lenses. Had the same problem. What you need to buy is the Rokinon 8mm F3.5 fisheye. Its the best quality full function lens for the lowest price. Only 100 dollars more than what you spent on this opteka lens.
1192969
Initially, I was also thinking of purchasing XSi earlier but now zeroed in on T1i (or 50D - wallet permitting) because (1) higher Effective Pixels in T1i / 50D - 15.1 M as against 12.2 M. ( I agree not a big factor for casual / normal photography) (2) HD Video in T1i (though one of my last considerations , but still it's a cool feature to have - managing a DSLR & Camcorder during an event / ceremony is difficult for me ) (3) DIGIC 4 Image Processing engine in T1i / 50D is better than Digic III in XSi (4) Lower ISO Rating / range in case of XSi (100-1600) as compared to T1i / 50D (100-3200 expandable to 6400,12800) meaning better performance in low light for T1i / 50D. (5) Number of LCD dots (in the LCD screen) is much higher in T1i / 50D (920,000) as against XSi (230,000) meaning better LCD visibility in bright sunlight. (6) Last but not the least , XSi was launched in January'08 as against March'09 for T1i - so you have already lost ~1.5 years out of 5 year life!! However , in case of Pixel density and price XSi scores over T1i/50D. Btw, cost difference is not much for T1i with and without the kit lens - better go for T1i kit. Canon 28-135mm zoom lens is ok but I like Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD Aspherical IF Macro Zoom Lens. Hope this will be helpful for you.
620683
This would be a good short term solution for increasing focal length I believe. No doubt you've checked out the longer focal length lenses and you can spend a whopping amount on them!
1394322
I had the X100 and now own the XT1 and 56mm f1.2. While it's not exactly what you're looking for I'll say that I am 100% happy w/ the 56mm and find the XT1 a huge upgrade from the X100. Not just in terms of image quality and bokeh but flexibility as well since you can change out the lenses.
1274513
If size and weight are a major concern, you would be hard pressed to find a more competent system than the Fuji X. The only other option is the OMD EM-1, really, if interchangeable lenses is what you need. My advice? Rent the XT-1 and either the 56mm 1.2 or the 14mm 2.8. Both are phenomenal lenses, and using them with the XT-1 will immediately answer your question for you.
678607
I use the 2.8 and have never been concerned about the weight. I used this lens on my Canon 5D with the extender 1.4 for a two hour whale watch trip from a boat, hand held. I didn't find it a concern. I'm a 5' 11", 200 lb man and 70 years old. I'm saying go for the f/2.8, you won't regret it.
298206
I own a 510 and think the second lens is a huge advantage--assuming you have a need for a telephoto--which I do. If you don't either would be fine. If you do as well, compare prices with comparable lenses and see ifyou feel the Xsi deserves the even greater price premium--it would not for me
2258976
Yes it'll work just fine. Essentially they are the same lens but this version is more geared towards shooting video with the "unclicked" aperture and gears for follow focus (which you'll never use on a fisheye).
1041292
I agree with the 35 F1.4 response. It is a very sharp lens and with the sale, it's priced great. WELL worth the $.