Noise gate only diffeerence between this and vt911?
1424195
Nope, other than this having a built in noise gate, the VT999 has a 3 band EQ, treble, mid, and bass, while the VT911 only has a tone knob, making this VT999 a more detailed option. . One thing tho is that the VT999 is nearly 1 and a half times bigger than the VT911, so it'll take up more space on a pedal board, in my opinion, it's worth it for a more detailed sound
1424196
The 911 just has a simple tone control, vs. the 3-band controls on the Monster...
762318
I don't really know. What I can say is that the DBX eq is excellent. Setting the eq to +6db across the spectrum and then equalizing the volumes produced no audible difference in the sound between the the eq in and out of the circuit. The noise level is also inaudible. I highly recommend it and would buy it all over again knowing what i know now. Good luick on your purchase. HEHJr
2028324
Odd! I have two of them. Switch to Intermatic ST01. No noise. Battery backup.
397138
I just glanced at my card and it appears to run the VIA VT6306 chipset. I've only used it for DV capture, so I can't state whether it will work well with an audio interface.
1742024
No, according to everything I've read, you can select either noise cancellation OR amplification; not both at the same time. BTW, you can prove this by switching between NC and AMP with no input. When you select NC from "off," you can hear the noise being reduced. When you switch to AMP from NC, the background noise increases.
1421649
Sorry, I never thought to look. All I can tell you is that it is installed in a normal 15Amp 120volt system and works great. It makes no noise while in operation. I have found no fault with this device.
1884668
900 has more detail and separation than the Shures. The only problem with the 900 is the "connection" issue. That is why I returned mine.
604815
Not really. There was an update to the firmware that reduced the noise from the fan. There was also an update to the hardware (unofficially) that further reduced the noise from the fan. It was never eliminated. The STV1 was dead quiet, and at all times. The STV2 also gets quite hot, something that the STV1 didn't really have an issue. The STV2 never got a Coax Antenna pass-through like the STV1. Also the STV2 never worked with Clear QAM, again unlike the STV1 which worked perfectly with Clear QAM.
1385716
We ran WOW on the computer and the sound in fact came out of the monitor so it seems to support two channel embedded sound at least. I have no way of testing it beyond that.
637791
The switching regulator board is based on the National Semiconductor LM2596. National is now part of Texas Instruments, so you can probably go to www.TI.com and look for an application note. As far as the connections, facing the top of the circuit board, with the display at the bottom, the left top screw terminal is In + and the left bottom screw terminal is IN-. On the right, the top screw terminal is the regulated Out+ and the bottom screw terminal is the OUT -. By measurement, the IN- and OUT- are "common" and connected to each other and measure about .01 ohm between the terminals. The voltmeter resolution show 0.1 volt but I would suggest verification of its accuracy against a known standard. As far as the long term current rating, that appears to be a function of the ambient circuit board temperature and the voltage drop across the regulator and current load. The input/output volt meter reading is selected with the small pushbutton at the bottom right of the voltmeter display. Two small LED's indicate whether it is the input or output reading. The left LED is the IN voltage and the right LED is the OUT voltage. Corner mounting holes will barely accommodate a 4-40 screw with the head extending slightly over the edge. It is a really nice board to drop 12 VDC to 5 or 6 volts for charging cellphones and 2WIRE DSL modems and 9V for two way portables. It produces minimal single frequency radio interference (790 khz) and not "white noise" in operation.
1682545
You could get by with a cheaper model. If it was me I'd buy the Behringer MDX 4600. That one is a 4 channel that is good if you run subs independent of your mains. My gate is built into my Behringer x32 pa. But as I understand out board gates they run from your pa main out into the gate and from the gate to your speakers. That allows the gate to clamp down on any noise prior to hitting your speakers.There are a tone of videos I'd bet on YouTube that can teach you how to set up the gate to work the way you need it to based on what music you are playing.
1637446
I believe the sounds quality features are different as well, though I could be wrong, on Kenwood's website there is comparison thing though if I recall correctly
1714751
First thing in my pedal board signal is a boss Noise Suppressor, which is always on. Beyond that, there's not much that can be done to tame the hum of the Magnum 44 as far as I know. Them's the breaks. I only own this as a back-up for any amp issues, not as my main amp.
145708
Mine is 110. If you get it I would suggest spending the extra $40 and get the Voshkod Russian tube upgrades off of eBay. It makes the sound less harsh and a little more detailed.
467649
I am not sure why the discrepancy. The model number on my computer was BHI7N11.
842639
Hall effect is the only real defiance you my hear, The EH Holy Grail has a tighter sound, Behringer DR600 has a off time sound, you may find the stomp boxes disappointing the Vox may not have the flexibility, but the sound will be much the same.
856914
The QX1002USB does not have a built in "classic" noise gate function although you could use the built in one-knob compressor to smooth out (i.e. compress) audio on channels 1 and 2. There is also a low-cut filter to remove low frequencies from channels 1 and 2. If you need a "classic" noise gate to mute a channel when there is no live signal coming to a channel, you need to buy a separate a unit and put it in front of the channel mix. I hope this helps.