Fujitsu ScanSnap S1300 vs. Fujitsu ScanSnap S1500? Which of these two models would you suggest for a home user with 20+ years of filing to de-clutter (for aging parents and self)? Thank you, Diane
1418095
I got my S1300 a few weeks ago and really like it. It is just a step up compared to the All in One printer I used for scanning. It can scan documents (feeder only) so fast. The only draw backs is you can't get bigger than 8.5" wide, and I have not figured out how to get Quicken to recognize it as a scanner. But the software for saving to directories, to an E-mail, or to Evernote, are great.
1418096
This link might helphttp://www.documentsnap.com/fujitsu-scansnap-how-are-the-s1300-and-scansnap-s1500-models-different/
1418097
Thanks, Todd. I went for it and found a refurbished one for less than $75 over the cost of a new s1300. I'm sure it will be worth it.
1418098
what do you think of the s1300? I am considering both the s1300 and the s1500 and still am unsure of what to buy. Where did you find a refurbished scanner? thanks so much for any information you can give!
1418099
Good question. MacWorld (more reliable than MacLife) ranks the Canon Formula p150 above the Fujitsu, and it's hard to argue with a world-class manufacturer like Canon. unfortunately, MacWorld hasn't reviewed the Fuj. 1300, but the Canon P150 is in the same price range as the 1300.
276271
It is portable and easy to carry with you. I have a copier scanner and the Scansnap does a far better job. You can desiginate searchable words in your document so you can locate it later. It will scan both sides in one pass. It does an excellent job of scanning photos to jpeg format. Lots of bang for you buck.
95887
I did not purchase this exact item because I think this is an updated version of the one I originally purchased. I returned it. It was extremely difficult to work with in scanning slides, very slow and the color resolution was awful. I eventually purchased a Canon CanoScan 8800F flatbed scanner from Amazon (probably five years ago) and love it! I scanned almost 15,000 slides and it is still going strong. Easy to work with, great for scanning slides, negatives, photos or documents. I have Windows XP and it is compatible. Remember, I purchased it years ago so I am sure there is an updated version of the one I have. I cannot say enough good about it. Not to mention customer service for Canon products is located in the U.S. I have contacted them twice and always received knowledgeable, understandable and quick resolution to my questions. I think I paid right at $200 for the Canon, but it would be worth it at twice the price. I would strongly encourage you to NOT purchase the Pacific Image unit.
1556911
it depends on the resolution you want to scan - if you chose 1 before the best, it would scan about 4 photos per minute. they don't have to be the same size; the tray only takes about 10 photos / pages at a time though - otherwise the fujitsu S1500 may be a better choice (double the price...)
636030
I'm sure either one will do a pretty good job for you. Fwiw, I purchased the Epson v500 for the simple reason that it has ICE Technology which does an absolutely amazing job of cleaning all sorts of debris/artifacts/dust et al from both slides and negatives. The hours I've saved not having to hand manipulate each image are numerous to say the least. This was the second time I've had to scan my full slide collection after the first set (over 500) was wiped out by a virus. This time was MUCH easier w/ the V500. Also, the quality of the scan improved a great degree so maybe the virus was a blessing in disguise afterall :-) Btw, I had no problem whatsoever setting it up on my Dell Vista OS. YMMV ... Cheers and good luck !
933908
I have both, and the ScanSnap gets my vote. The Neat Receipts idea is great, but the software didn't deliver. It was good at character recognition, but after scanning only 100 documents/receipts or so, it started loading extremely slowly, and got slower and slower each time I scanned a new receipt. It was basically useless, unless you want to wait 10-15 minutes for it to load, and the same amount of time to scan one receipt. I don't know about you, but my paper backlog amounts to a lot more than 100 receipts. I went out and purchased the ScanSnap. There's no character recognition, but if you just want to digitize your documents and receipts, the ScanSnap is your product. Compared to the Neat Receipts scanner (when first purchased) it is as fast (or faster) with single or double sided scanning. It automatically detects blank pages, and it has never once jammed. It creates a pdf wherever you want it saved, and I can easily email the document (which I often do, instead of faxing). ScanSnap is still as fast as the day I opened the box. It gets my vote hands down. Maybe someday they'll add character recognition to the included software.
1335112
I've only scanned a handful of docs-seems to work good. Our multi page feeder works great. We have the 8910 at our front desk-small healthcare office & I have our old 8860 back by my desk & that still works good including multi feeder after 5 or 6 years. We like the Brother machines after several bad experiences with HP. Good luck. Jim
220500
I've had multiple HP all-in-one printers & I can say without a doubt that YES, the ScanSnap scans MUCH faster than any of them! It neatly sits right on top of my HP all-in-one which I still use for printing, but use the ScanSnap for SUPER FAST scanning! Definitely worth it!
1582476
Yea I'm wondering the same. I' d really like to get this and I need a scanner now. Maybe someone can check with fujitsu and let us all know about an update?? Then again it appears so good why change it??
132657
So far the best option is the fujitsu scansnap. Waiting for the price to come down a hair before I bite the bullet.
220497
Yes, I have an 6500. The scansnap is very quick and very easy to use. It quickly makers a PDF file ans scans the front and back of your sheet. I use one at work and have the larger scansnap at home. I can't say enough good things about this product
1114354
Nice info G. Williams. Wonder if this is available here in the UK though? (Boots perhaps, anyone know?) BTW after re-reeading my comment above I forgot to say... Using the Fujitsu S1500/S1550M users can also use the included "Carrier Sheet" (a clear plastic folder thingy) to put photo's into to protect them whilst going through the scanner. You get one Carrier Sheet included with the machine and can buy packs of 5 (c.$25 per 5-pack, at last check) as well, if you need more of them for heavy jobs.
1226905
I actually returned it - it was barely bigger than a paper towel roll if I remember. I ended up getting a Fujitsu ScanSnap s1300i and am very pleased with it. A little more expensive, but excellent scans, it's fast, and the multi-sheet feeder is convenient.
1134679
I have both the S1500M as well as the S1300. I can attest that both work well on a mac, the quality of the scan seems to be very good [and equal between the two models]. The software is quite customizable and capable, including the ability to scan to a network drive, google docs, etc... However, I can verify the comment from 'Desalegn' above, who indicated that the 1300 is slower. It is A LOT slower. If speed is any concern for you, then I would recommend the 1500 variety. The additional size of the 1500 is not that significant when compared with the 1300, unless you actually plan on lugging the scanner around with you. The other benefit of the 1300 is that it can be powered via the USB port on your computer, and the 1500 cannot. This is a big deal for the traveling office. If you are trying to decide between the two models, it is really an issue of portability. If you are traveling and need a scanner to go with you to do some light volume imaging, you will be happy with the 1300. If you are going to use it on a desk, you will be much happier with the 1500. The 1500 can be moved around without too much trouble, just not in a laptop bag like the 1300. Moving the 1500 between offices once in awhile won't cause much distress, and the speed of the scanning will make the trouble more than worthwhile, but you're not going to travel with it on a business trip.
930632
I really don't remember. But unless you have a special need for very long scans-forget about this scanner-it is junk. I returned mine. Get yourself a Fujitsu SnapScan 1500-really excellent scanner-I love it.
318388
From Fujitsu's website: "the ScanSnap S1500 Deluxe Bundle includes Rack2-Filer V5.0, an ultra-intuitive scanning and file management application for home or small office. Through the use of graphical cabinets and e-Binders, users will experience a familiar yet heightened level of accessibility and convenience to their digital content." There are a few pictures on the site, and I'm sure you can track down more info.
337617
I was looking at the Fujitsu ScanSnap S1500M Instant PDF Sheet-Fed Scanner for the Macintosh .. I do not know what the difference are between the two .. I did find their website ..http://www.fujitsu.com/us/services/computing/peripherals/scanners/scansnap/