What is the difference between this machine and the PX2? Also, what exactly is the footprint for this machine (example 8x10...)
1431158
Hello Mr. Dawson, It basically come with a leg press attachment added. Both units also have a optional 50lb weight stack available. Footprint is 83"H x 71"L x 66"W Hope this helps Fitdesire Customer Service
1496735
Peter, what brand/model/spec were the 2X2 GB? I'd like to upgrade mine also to 4 GB.
1151764
I don't have experience with the other machine but i wouldn't get my hopes up. The F2D2 makes acceptable home copies, but won't suffice for professional uses. Hope this helps.
100760
Similar handling characteristics, mcpx v2 is about 2inches bigger in main rotor diameter, better against wind outdoors while nano cpx is small & thus is better for indoors. I have both of them but am not experienced enough to be good with either of them, but not a fault of the copters, just a lack of my experience.
319890
I have had no problem with the SP2615x20. I replaced a 2 HP with it and it works fine.
2023902
I'll be able to do a direct comparison soon, as I've got a PX312 coming in, after purchasing the VN-302PC. The specs and features are very nearly clones of each other, but I've found that the Olympus lacks some rather basic abilities that the Sony covers, such as a means of moving files between the 5 folders for organization. Also, the files recorded on the internal memory can't be moved over to the external memory card through the recorder; though it's easy enough to do when connected to a PC. It shows up as two separate drives on the PC, and the files remain uniquely named whether recorded on internal or external memory, so it's a simple matter to just copy them over. (If they reused file numbers on int vs ext memory then there would be an added complication of renaming before copying). I'd rather that the file names included the timestamp, like some other recorders do, but neither of these do that. Record quality of the Olympus is fine, so if the Sony does just as well, the Sony has more comprehensive features. The file erase process is better on the Sony as well, because it plays back the recording you're about to erase for confirmation before recording. With the Olympus you have to stop the playback on the target file first and be careful that it didn't advance to the next file, and watch the screen for the sequence of prompts to follow through with the delete process. I think the Sony method for deleting is better because it can be initiated while the target file is playing, and the playback of the recording as confirmation has less potential for inadvertently deleting the wrong recording. I believe the Sony also retains the time for at least a minute during battery changes, while the Olympus loses an hour or two and needs to be reset. It's not very significant since the batteries last so long, but so far, all the pros have been on the Sony side. When I get the Sony in hand I'll see if it actually performs as well as the Olympus
2151080
One is 3x-9x power/zoom, the other is 4x-12x power/zoom. There is no advantage as they are both vx-2, however, one of them zooms further than the other.
1748812
I have to agree with the other response. I originally bought a 9x12 but it was a monster. Gave it to my dad, bought the 6x8, never looked back.
571776
It is a benchtop model. I use it only for smaller project, but it has plenty of power to handle Forstner bits, etc. I built a rolling table out of 2x4's with a plywood top and bolted the base to the tabletop. Operates smootly, nice controls. It has a laser, but I don't use it. Even if I knew the laser X was dead on, I'd still double check with the drill bit, but it is good to estimate where you're placing your wood before lining up the exact spot with the bit. If you don't need the extra clearance of a floor model, then I highly recommend this drill press.
1678364
DM10X is sturdier (doesn't move as much when you hit it), the 2 "floor toms" are 12" instead of the smaller 10", it looks better, and I think that's about it.
84544
Hello, Have reviews on both models on Amazon. Had a bunch of trouble with the standard model, and no trouble with version 2. The version 2 has a lot more metal parts in the rotor head and tail, and digital tail servo which is much more responsive. Please see both reviews. So far I would say the version 2 is worth the extra money. Good day!
472374
I bought the X550, this is another model. So i believe amazon got these mixed up, but from what I read this is the EeePC. So I would think this is 10.1 inches, can't prove it. So sorry :(
1855076
It's about 5cm in width and height. Looks gorgeous when the machine is turned on. I personally think it is 10/10 design.
305384
I own them both, and have been using them in my portriat studio for a while now. i'll say this, theres really not much difference in the two cameras, a few minor upgrades in the xti, what it boils down to is image quality, and from what i've seen they are equal. Just as fyi, I have been able to get prints as large as 20x30 from both cameras with excellent results.
2177571
I don't have the mcpx but from what I've heard I think the nano cpx is a lot more twitchy. If you've had some experience with fixed or collective pitch then the nano cpx would be a good choice. If you're looking to get into fixed/collective pitch then go with the mcpx
2266324
As best as I can tell, the PX 02 has 3 baffle filters and a remote control while the PX 03 has 2 baffle filters and no remote control. I got this information from a chart on page 4 of the Installation Guide and User's Manual available on the XtremeAir website.
1504687
Yes according to manufacturer..............would suggest looking at 10X42 vs 8X42. In retrospect, I should have gone with the 10X.