what's the differences between this and the EVO-series? The price difference is quite noticable
1388761
The pro uses a different type of NAND. The Pro uses MLC which is older but faster. The regular 840 and the Evo use TLC which is newer and cheaper to produce. Also, the Pro's MLC NAND is supposed to last much longer. The 2nd article estimates that MLC's expected lifespan is 60 years vs 19 years for TLC.
1388762
Both drives are superb. The PRO series is the most robust in my opinion. The type of memory chips used in the PRO are more robust and allow more read/write cycles. Honestly the EVO is a very good series and has been proven to outlast many other drives. EVO drives are also very fast compared to most drives. If you want a drive which will be used heavily or in a professional environment, then I would recommend getting a PRO series. If you want a bang for your buck drive that outperforms most drives and is almost on par with the PRO, then the EVO is the way to go. You will save a good amount of money going with the EVO and depending on your system and use you may not even see a difference between the two in everyday use. Look at some reviews and decide for yourself. Either way you are making an excellent choice for choosing a Samsung ssd.
1456582
i have the evo and it works fine. and it comes with the micro usb connector u dont need to buy a one
382553
Not sure what the difference is, but we got ours for @$500 on amazon and it has worked very well with no complaints here; much better deal than spending $1000s on a custom installed system!
343252
Thanks for the reply. If you're right, it's odd that it's the one with the facial recognition that is cheaper---maybe there's some other difference?
1035472
This guy gives a great comparison. There are some minor but important differences that may matter to you.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkgR_307OEo
938250
the only difference between the systems is the color of the receiver. the reason why the 2300 has a higher retail price is because it came out a year earlier
1369105
More same than different. The new UE model (this one) is 1.5 inches taller and half an inch deeper. The handle makes up the bulk of the extra height which the old one didn't have. The driver configuration is almost identical, 2 tweeters, 2 3inch woofers, and slightly bigger 2.5" passive radiators (old one had 2" radiators). The sound is near identical except the new one has more bass because of the larger radiators. The price went up quite a bit from $150 to $250 MSRP. I own the old one and still very satisfied with its low/mid/high balance. If you don't mind the lack of a handle and buying used, the old fine is a great deal.
1266269
I am not sure about the difference. I have use EvoraPlus for a number of years and do like it, Lynn
1436663
Check out the differences between the 1513 and the 1512 and consider if they are worth the extra $100 to you or not. Me personally, I always try to get the latest model when it's not a bank breaker. To be honest though, 2GB of RAM and 4 ethernet ports are not that much of an upgrade. I purchased the additional 1GB of RAM for my 1512 to bump it up to 2GB, think I picked it up here on Amazon for around $30. I highly recommend getting the extra memory for the 1512 if you go that route. Here is a link on some folks talking about the differences of the 1512 and the 1513: http://forum.synology.com/enu/viewtopic.php?f=200&t;=66881&start;=75 Check out the differences between the 1513 and the 1512 and consider if they are worth the extra $100 to you or not. Me personally, I always try to get the latest model when it's not a bank breaker. To be honest though, 2GB of RAM and 4 ethernet ports are not that much of an upgrade. I purchased the additional 1GB of RAM for my 1512 to bump it up to 2GB, think I picked it up here on Amazon for around $30. I highly recommend getting the extra memory for the 1512 if you go that route. Here is a link on some folks talking about the differences of the 1512 and the 1513:... » Read More Check out the differences between the 1513 and the 1512 and consider if they are worth the extra $100 to you or not. Me personally, I always try to get the latest model when it's not a bank breaker. To be honest though, 2GB of RAM and 4 ethernet ports are not that much of an upgrade. I purchased the additional 1GB of RAM for my 1512 to bump it up to 2GB, think I picked it up here on Amazon for around $30. I highly recommend getting the extra memory for the 1512 if you go that route. Here is a link on some folks talking about the differences of the 1512 and the 1513: http://forum.synology.com/enu/viewtopic.php?f=200&t;=66881&start;=75 « Show Less
1035473
This guy gives a great comparison. There are some minor but important differences that may matter to you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkgR_307OEo
314948
The II signifies that it is the second generation HAF XB, but is not necessary since the EVO also denotes being second gen. It really is just a HAF XB EVO.
1771822
There is no difference, just no amazon sellers offering a good price right now, I paid 349 on amazon for mine, be patient they will come back... good luck
407967
The 128GB is slower than the 256GB+ due to the way the controllers store the data. Basically the controllers write to multiple memory modules simultaneously and the 128GB model has fewer of them so it is somewhat slower. the Samsung Evo is probably a better bet if you are looking at the 128GB model as it is only a little more expensive and much faster (though still not quite as fast as the 256gb Pro).
1117129
Agreed, The Evo V has a 4.3" screen as opposed to the LTE at 4.7". Buyer beware and do your homework..
494389
I've talked to someone who owns both, and read numerous reviews. No one can find a material difference. Seems to be a case of OEM rebranding.
537427
Not so good compared to newer phones with similar price. If you're about to buy one, I would better recommend you to go with the amazon's Fire Phone. The camera is muuuuchh better and the phone it's very affordable. And think it pays by itself (you get it for free) with the included prime subscription. you'll love it because you'll have a much better general experience with it than with the HTC EVO Shift. I took evo shift a year ago because of the physical keyboard, but it doesn't worth because all the general bad experience with the old operating system, long delays for anything to load, continuous crashes, etc. Go better with the Fire phone, you'll love it. Not so good compared to newer phones with similar price. If you're about to buy one, I would better recommend you to go with the amazon's Fire Phone. The camera is muuuuchh better and the phone it's very affordable. And think it pays by itself (you get it for free) with the included prime subscription. you'll love it because you'll have a much better general experience with it than with the HTC EVO Shift. I took evo shift a year ago because of the physical keyboard, but it doesn't worth because all the general bad experience with the old operating system, long delays for anything to load,... » Read More Not so good compared to newer phones with similar price. If you're about to buy one, I would better recommend you to go with the amazon's Fire Phone. The camera is muuuuchh better and the phone it's very affordable. And think it pays by itself (you get it for free) with the included prime subscription. you'll love it because you'll have a much better general experience with it than with the HTC EVO Shift. I took evo shift a year ago because of the physical keyboard, but it doesn't worth because all the general bad experience with the old operating system, long delays for anything to load, continuous crashes, etc. Go better with the Fire phone, you'll love it. « Show Less
709922
It doesn't look like there is any difference. I'd save the money and go with the less expensive ones.