High sensitivity (w/o) flash? If so, at what set megapixel?
1399456
I'm not a camera buff and don't understand the question. If the question is how does it do in low-light conditions without the flash - then, not very good.
646123
Hello, On EXR and Auto mode I've found my images in low light to be sub par without using the flash - which then can unfortunately cause it's own set of problems. However, as I learn the camera I find adjusting the settings and really depending on the manual as a reference guide, along with youtube tutorial videos that my low and dim light photos are improving. I'm an Amateur at this stage of course but more advanced photographers would have an effortless time taking great shots in low light conditions. If you're shopping around check out the Panasonic FZ200 and the Sony DDSC-HX300 both have won tremendous accolades for low light performance. Hope this helps!
2051502
As Paul said, the flash works best in the five feet to eight feet range, but if you set the ISO at ISO 400, you can get a range of about 15 feet in a well lighted room with Energizer Ultimate Lithium batteries. Beyond 15 feet, it would be better to turn the flash OFF and set the ISO at ISO 800. You will need to brace the camera against a table or wall to get the sharpest photos, as working indoors without flash may yield very slow shutter speeds.
1816399
I'm habing the same issue. Have tried seeting camera to MXP and FXP and am getting lots of grainyness and aritfacts. Anyone have and solve this issue?
99188
You can set it to burst mode 10 frames per second. Good to have a class 10 SDHC card to, will speed up time between shots (image capture to memory).
1130073
It depends on the settings used. I can take some really good pictures in low-light without flash.I've found that the built-in photo editor can help a little if needed as well.Its best to choose the mode that is best for your shot such as smart, program, scene...etc.; then, adjust the settings to get the desired effect.
948241
Well, it's just the size of the sensor troubles me. What kind of picture is this going to take at even a 400 ISO? Nevermind 800 or higher.I just wonder if it's worth getting a camera this big when the sx200IS can be had for almost half the price, it's way easier to carry, and when you add the chdk firmware, will be almost as functional.I suppose if this were to be your only camera, but personally, I'd like to see what they do with the Rebel, either later this year or next. Or if I have a "rich uncle die", buy the 5D Mark II ;-)
216037
Hey Mark, Try setting the camera to the "P" on the dial (stands for Program AE). Once you do, click the Q. MENU button on the bottom right of camera. Select the ISO setting and change it to 200 or 400. I'm having the same issues as you with this camera and its poor low light performance. To get better shots indoors, it helps to crank up the ISO to a higher setting. The downside is that the picture may come in a bit grainy. The higher the ISO, the more grain, but at least you'll have a brighter and clearer picture. At ISO 200 and 400, you shouldn't have too much grain for it to ruin the picture. Let me know if it works!
2260302
In that kind of environment, where you're standing in the dark but the kids on stage are lit, it performs very well. In fact, we had a concert at my church a couple weeks ago and I shot in those precise conditions... and the pictures turned out great! Oh... don't be afraid to bump your ISO, even up to 3200, and you should be fine. ヅ
1230949
This is a great recommendation. I tried it in many outdoor lighting conditions and found the JPEG quality greatly enhanced. I don't have a problem post-processing a little...I use Picasa2 and the results are good enough to add a tad more sharpness and contrast. I'm still experimenting with low light, no flash conditions and getting moderately mixed results. I'd appreciate any guidance in this area. Other than this, I'm most pleased with the performance of the K10d. I've tried most of the shooting modes and found them to be as advertised. I'm a competent amateur, who desires to shoot quality pictures without having to tweak the settings with every shot. This camera is a quality piece of gear. This is a great recommendation. I tried it in many outdoor lighting conditions and found the JPEG quality greatly enhanced. I don't have a problem post-processing a little...I use Picasa2 and the results are good enough to add a tad more sharpness and contrast. I'm still experimenting with low light, no flash conditions and getting moderately mixed results. I'd appreciate any guidance in this area. Other than this, I'm most pleased with the performance of the K10d. I've tried most of the shooting modes and found them to be as advertised. I'm a competent amateur, who desires to shoot quality... » Read More This is a great recommendation. I tried it in many outdoor lighting conditions and found the JPEG quality greatly enhanced. I don't have a problem post-processing a little...I use Picasa2 and the results are good enough to add a tad more sharpness and contrast. I'm still experimenting with low light, no flash conditions and getting moderately mixed results. I'd appreciate any guidance in this area. Other than this, I'm most pleased with the performance of the K10d. I've tried most of the shooting modes and found them to be as advertised. I'm a competent amateur, who desires to shoot quality pictures without having to tweak the settings with every shot. This camera is a quality piece of gear. « Show Less
655494
I can't live with a 0.3 megapixel. I was all set to buy the UL80vt until I realized it had such low webcam resolution. I intend to use Skype a lot so this is unacceptable. It's a shame too, since the UL80vt has everything else that I was looking for.
1375625
Auto mode picks the best possible settings from a huge internal library. Auto ISO enables low light pics without flash. The only issue is in bright light(in all Modes) Frank Wilson mentioned in a previous post the quick set dial for adjusting exposure. I find Setting it to -.3 gives good results. You can always brighten picture but can't darken washed out ones. Picture quality is impressive.
2215046
Shutter goes up to 1000 frames per sec. but needs lots of light an at a lower resilution. works best at 480 frames per sec.
943784
Seems to handle low light shooting (Especially with high ISO) very well: http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2012/10/09/night-time-street-shooting-with-the-sony-rx1-amazing-high-iso-samples/
2248609
I have had amazing results in low light, back light, and practically no light conditions. The auto and advanced auto flash settings are great, and with flash turned off in low light conditions, the picture still shows up in focus with plenty of detail.
1760740
It did very well when I took photos inside at a college basketball game. I used the shutter priority for 1/400 speed. The "scene" sports setting was giving me 1/250 and 1/300. I'd post a picture, but don't know how. I was impressed.
140077
I used it once for a wedding, and it was perfect. I used an attached flash, as the built in flash gets blocked on the widest setting. Mostly I use it for travel and scenery. Best at f8 if you want sharper edges and corners, as with most zooms. In vertical shots, the tops of trees still get a little blurry, so I have a couple of primes for critical work needing greater enlargement.