Does anyone have experience as to compare the qualities of this GX7 to the Fujifilm X-E2 with their kit 18-55mm lens?
1373455
I own both the GX7 and the XE-2. While the GX7 is a nice camera the XE-2 blows it away. The kit lens on the XE-2 is much nicer in it's construction. It feels more substantial and to be of nicer quality materials. The GX7 takes nice pictures but you do get a lot of noise in the images that are taken in lower light conditions. I attribute this to the smaller sensor size. I've been really impressed with the overall image and build quality of the XE-2. So much so that I will often leave my larger Canon and Nikon bodies at home and grab the XE-2 if I'm heading out for the day with the family. Both cameras are really nice but the XE-2 is in my opinion the better camera.
314830
You'll need a bigger filter. The Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4.0 requires a 58mm. This one's a 52mm
1820412
The 1.8 is similar in build quality to the kit lens--probably a slight bit below the XSI kit. If you're happy with the kit lens, you should be happy with the 1.8.There's a reason why 93% of the reviews here are 4 or 5 stars--this lens takes great pictures. For $80, what do you have to lose?
1394322
I had the X100 and now own the XT1 and 56mm f1.2. While it's not exactly what you're looking for I'll say that I am 100% happy w/ the 56mm and find the XT1 a huge upgrade from the X100. Not just in terms of image quality and bokeh but flexibility as well since you can change out the lenses.
2218321
For me it is simply about the good ISO performance and the x-trans sensor. As an owner of a x100s I am familiar with the quality of the x-trans sensor files and there is something special there. Combo that with the good AF, the great EVF, easy access to all the manual settings, and the really good quality lenses, and you've got a winner.
1274515
I sold my canon 7d and two very good canon lenses so I could buy the X-T1 - that was 3 months ago. In that time I have used it nearly every day, including a 3 week hiking trip in Utah. I haven't regretted that decision for one second. The xt1 has better image quality, is a joy to use and half the weight of the canon. I often left the canon in the car when I went hiking because of its weight and size. The xt1 by comparison is a constant hiking companion. Make the move you won't regret it.
107775
My understanding is the 55-300 DA L is sold as part of the kit only. The optical performance apparently is the same, but it is a lighter lens matched to the K-X. You have already mentioned the other differences. I have the same kit you do. You may also want to do a search on the Pentax User Forum. I have found many of my Pentax K-X questions are common ones that have been posed & answered before.
2200564
I was comparing these two lenses as well and I went with the Tokina solely because of the fixed 2.8 aperture. Unlike the DX, the newer DX II does a phenomenal job with lens flare. The Canon is a little sharper and offers a bit more zoom, but I didn't really need my wide angle to go to 20mm.
4766
I've been using the G 1X since it first came out. I can tell you that the amount of noise at high ISOs is remarkably minimal. No camera is ideal for everyone. But the large sensor, the portability of the camera, and low noise at high ISOs make this good for me. I hope this helps.
2218323
As an owner of a XE1, the biggest draw to the system has been the lenses. They are simply great performers. The upcoming lenses are even better. The other is the larger sensor and it's design. It's ability to take great pictures at high ISO just opens up a welcomed flexibility to many shooting situations. Also, larger viewfinders allow the photographer to become more immersed in the shot. It's a big plus that I mistakenly forgot when purchasing the XE1. To top it all off, the X line has a solid, made in Japan feel to (like the older Nikon SP rangefinders. I anticipate the X-T1 to feel just as robust. As an owner of a XE1, the biggest draw to the system has been the lenses. They are simply great performers. The upcoming lenses are even better. The other is the larger sensor and it's design. It's ability to take great pictures at high ISO just opens up a welcomed flexibility to many shooting situations. Also, larger viewfinders allow the photographer to become more immersed in the shot. It's a big plus that I mistakenly forgot when purchasing the XE1. To top it all off, the X line has a solid, made in Japan feel to (like the older Nikon SP rangefinders. I anticipate the X-T1 to feel just... » Read More As an owner of a XE1, the biggest draw to the system has been the lenses. They are simply great performers. The upcoming lenses are even better. The other is the larger sensor and it's design. It's ability to take great pictures at high ISO just opens up a welcomed flexibility to many shooting situations. Also, larger viewfinders allow the photographer to become more immersed in the shot. It's a big plus that I mistakenly forgot when purchasing the XE1. To top it all off, the X line has a solid, made in Japan feel to (like the older Nikon SP rangefinders. I anticipate the X-T1 to feel just as robust. « Show Less
1820410
This lens is entirely different from the kit lens. And we don't know what kit lens you are talking about. Of the 40D? of the XT? I got the XT and the 40D. Both came with a 17?-55mm and a 28-135mm IS. The 50mm lens is a different lens all together because it doesn't zoom so you'll be doing a lot of moving back and forward with your feet. The nice thing about this lens is that pictures are RAZOR SHARP. I mean I've never seen pictures sharper than what this lens has produced. I bought 2 of these lenses because I really love the pictures they take. Also, this lens can take pictures in a dark room about 10 times as easy as the kit lens on the 40D or the XT. The f/1.8 is amazing. The color, the light, the picture sharpness = worth $70 by far. GET IT. :)
883523
I own the FZ200 and returned the X-S1. Even though the X-S1 has a larger sensor which should result in better image quality, unfortunately the X-S1's auto focus is unreliable, image stabilization almost seems non-existent , and the lens has about the same slow and dark specs as a DSLR kit lens, which results in blurry pics more often them not. To get around that, you can up the ISO a bit, but that won't help focus issues and reduces the mirage quality. I get much better pics out of my Panasonic FZ200 and I suspect you would get the same out of the FZ70.
583554
I found that the photo's I've taken with this lens are much sharper. It's almost like the kit lens was looking through a double paned window in comparison. The color saturation seems to be better too, but it could be due to the crispness of the image. If your unsure - rent one and compare, or find a friend willing to share and try it for a day. This lens is much heavier to carry (more elements means more weight). I don't find this a fault.
608535
Hey,the focus is very fast and absolutely noticeable compared to the 18-55mm. Hope that helps.Kind regards
85338
I'm not really an expert here; this is my first Fuji. I'm normally a Canon guy, but I was disappointed with my G9, so I thought I would give the Fuji a try. So far, it has been good.As far as I know, dimensionally, the X10 and the X20 are the same. I bought a lens shade that was designed for the X10, and that works fine.
1246986
Often times Fuji AF system frustrates me. I hear that XF35mm lens performance might feel better with X-T1 but with my X-E1 your description is really familiar to me. When it happens, I put it in manual focus mode which makes a great photo.
2256737
I have purchased other Fuji XF lenses, and i keep the 23mm lens on there at all times. It's my favorite lens. Others are smaller, but none feel or work as well as the 23. It's tack sharp even at 1.4. I would make this my lone prime, if that was your option.