What is the difference between this pair and the more expensive ER23-HF2-CBLT-AN-A?
1374135
That model is made specifically for Android (hence the AN) at the end of that.
1374136
I think maybe just the color and that the more expensive ones are specifically for Android. You should reach out to Etymotic support.
859137
They are the same compressor under a few different names for some odd reason. Get whichever one is cheaper
454504
we have both, to be honest I do not see much of a difference between the twol Maybe the high speed isn't quite as fast as the older one, but not a noticeable difference. Still easy to install, still quiet when it runs, no vibration.
605864
I don't know. I think I had the same question when I was looking at them and couldn't tell a difference so I just bought the cheaper one.
1133930
I own both and the are essentially identical except in one aspect. They are the same size and capacity and made with the same parts and electronic controls. This difference is that the 700, that I bought 9 years ago, included a special KF antimicrobial filter in it that is not mentioned in the new 220. It obviously cut the mfr's cost but has no impact on the softening ability of the unit that I've now owned a few months, running flawlessly. Very easy to install and set-up so long as you provide the in and out plumbing.
1531201
One has metal base plate the other is plastic, not sure which is which. The more expensive one has the metal.
186159
I don'tknow. I haven't used the $38 product so I have no way to compare the two.
240855
The only difference that I can see is the price. I would buy the one under Amazon Prime.
331845
Thank you very much, after reading both reviews, I was wondering the exact same thing. Since essentially they are the same, i will purchase the less expensive. Thanks again
284370
Nothing that I can tell except price. If there is something different between the two it is well hidden. The both have the same dimensions, construction material, etc. I personally am buying the $6.97 version and have been very happy with them. I also got one of the 1312 versions and feel I wasted 4 bucks.
1112715
Both work the same as far as I can tell. I don't know about the price difference. I usually take more than the directions say.
1832256
Hi Joanne,Both of them are N routers. The routers differs in 2 things. The E1500 has 3 internal antennas compared to the E1200 which only has 2. That means that E1500 can boost your signal compared to the E1200. The other thing is that Tx/Rx (Transmit Traffic/Receive Traffic) with E1500 is 2x3 compared to the E1200 which has 2x2 only. You may read this link http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid;=e1bb6290d41b4ead817488c288329c3f_Product_Comparison_between_E1200__E1500__E1550__E2500__and_E.xml&pid;=80&respid;=0&snid=6&dispid;=0&cpage;=search for comparison about the products.Thanks,Cisco-Linksys Supporthttp://homesupport.cisco.com Hi Joanne,Both of them are N routers. The routers differs in 2 things. The E1500 has 3 internal antennas compared to the E1200 which only has 2. That means that E1500 can boost your signal compared to the E1200. The other thing is that Tx/Rx (Transmit Traffic/Receive Traffic) with E1500 is 2x3 compared to the E1200 which has 2x2 only. You may read this link http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid;=e1bb6290d41b4ead817488c288329c3f_Product_Comparison_between_E1200__E1500__E1550__E2500__and_E.xml&pid;=80&respid;=0&snid=6&dispid;=0&cpage;=search for... » Read More Hi Joanne,Both of them are N routers. The routers differs in 2 things. The E1500 has 3 internal antennas compared to the E1200 which only has 2. That means that E1500 can boost your signal compared to the E1200. The other thing is that Tx/Rx (Transmit Traffic/Receive Traffic) with E1500 is 2x3 compared to the E1200 which has 2x2 only. You may read this link http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid;=e1bb6290d41b4ead817488c288329c3f_Product_Comparison_between_E1200__E1500__E1550__E2500__and_E.xml&pid;=80&respid;=0&snid=6&dispid;=0&cpage;=search for comparison about the products.Thanks,Cisco-Linksys Supporthttp://homesupport.cisco.com « Show Less
768050
This is exactly the same problem I had before I decided to buy the black platinum. Black platinum has 27 Gbps hyper speed, ISF2000 has 21 Gbps hyper speed. The main reason the ISF2000 is much more expensive than the Black Platinum is because it have hdmi signal resolution indicator and ISF certified for calibration feature. First, I don't use both the feature, because once I installed the cable behind the cabinet, who will bother to see the signal indicator on the cable (4K, HD or SD)? The TV or the receiver will tell us the signal resolution. And second, I don't use ISF calibration. So both of the cables have same main feature, like 4K ready, 24K Gold Contacts, High density shielding, and V grip connectors. But the black platinum faster and much cheaper than ISF 2000. There is no reason I would buy the ISF 2000. And after I use the black platinum with my home theatre, I am very satisfied with the result. Both the picture and the sound are amazing. And I saw many seller sell ISF2000 at much reduced price now, but I didn't see the same with black platinum. In my opinion, it because the black platinum sold much better than ISF 2000. Hope it helps you to decide :)
503607
There is no difference. Not sure why you are seeing it as more expensive. I'd just try to get the larger one at the lowest price you can find.
322647
The one I ordered was no different. It just cost less! If there is difference, I am not aware of it.
328630
There differences are slight and I have show cased them in this video ==> http://dai.ly/x12fwc1 The main difference is price.
1471441
Hi, Joe, I really don't know the difference between these two models. At the time of purchasing, I just got the only model which it supports 95Mb/s transforming rate.