Does anyone feel strongly the extra zoom and wifi is worth paying (currently) ~$600 more for the G30? Seems those are the main differences.
1400691
The zoom range is marginal. However, I do record my grandsons high school football games from the stands and 90% of the time it is enough. Wi-Fi is personal; it does not interest me. Either is a great camera.
1400692
A lot depends on how you're using your camcorder and what are your needs. The extra zoom length would be worthwhile for outdoor video rather than having a extra zoom lense to attach. I find it an aggravation to attach it then remove it, back and forth, back and forth, because the zoom is either too strong or not strong enough; whereas if the camera already offered the longer range it'll save me time and the extra cost of an additional lense. The wifi might be helpful when uploading to your computer or other peripheral. I don't need the wifi but others may enjoy it. Everyone's needs are different. It would be worthwhile for me. A lot depends on how you're using your camcorder and what are your needs. The extra zoom length would be worthwhile for outdoor video rather than having a extra zoom lense to attach. I find it an aggravation to attach it then remove it, back and forth, back and forth, because the zoom is either too strong or not strong enough; whereas if the camera already offered the longer range it'll save me time and the extra cost of an additional lense. The wifi might be helpful when uploading to your computer or other peripheral. I don't need the wifi but others may enjoy it. Everyone's needs are... » Read More A lot depends on how you're using your camcorder and what are your needs. The extra zoom length would be worthwhile for outdoor video rather than having a extra zoom lense to attach. I find it an aggravation to attach it then remove it, back and forth, back and forth, because the zoom is either too strong or not strong enough; whereas if the camera already offered the longer range it'll save me time and the extra cost of an additional lense. The wifi might be helpful when uploading to your computer or other peripheral. I don't need the wifi but others may enjoy it. Everyone's needs are different. It would be worthwhile for me. « Show Less
1400693
Depends on what you're gonna use it for. I film wildlife with mine at distances up to 400 yards. I would have paid the extra $$$ in a heartbeat for more zoom. The wifi I could care less about. I do love the G20 though, it's been a great camera.
2116979
I assume you mean the S390G? The only differences I'm aware of is the "G" has a 2 Megapixel Camera while the "C" only has a 1.3 Megapixel Camera. Also, the "G" is Wi-Fi compatible. There may be others, but I'm not sure.
758149
I noticed the same thing. I think there is one vendor that is selling the G7 over $900. If you delve further into the Amazon system you will find that the G7 actually sells about $40 less than the newer model when you calculate shipping.
454312
Don't know to be honest as I've never tried the G1N. Looking at the specs side by side though the G3 is miles ahead. A worth while investment I would say.
267125
Well I must say I love my G1!! I was thinking the pancake 20mm f1.7 should be my next purchase, it just hard to convince myself about cashing $400 for it, but for what I have read it's the most versatile of them all. Now that the EZ zoom is based on digital zoom right? I try not to use the digital zoom since I don't like the lost of quality. I'm not big into telephoto as of now at least, so I think I'll go for the pancake. It's suppose to be 40mm as equivalent to a 35mm camera. And the reviews say it's versatile enough for dimly lit scenarios.Thanks for your reply!!
1331056
I have a G10 and I really enjoy fooling around with the settings, but it really does quite well with the auto mode and excellent macro mode. The wide angle ability is a definite plus. Colors are vibrant.
4766
I've been using the G 1X since it first came out. I can tell you that the amount of noise at high ISOs is remarkably minimal. No camera is ideal for everyone. But the large sensor, the portability of the camera, and low noise at high ISOs make this good for me. I hope this helps.
1134714
Have you made a decision? I'm in the same boat. Got a bunch of Sony DVs but the camera is huge. Time to move to HD. I like the Canon HF M40 because its got alot of the same optics as the G10 at half the price. The Pan has a much better range on the wide end, so I'm torn. Not sure if the Pan features are as good as the Canon otherwise.
1492543
The Flash is great. There's flash compensation controls for +/- 2 f-stops in addition to the already remarkable exposure accuracy. The flash has a manual pop-up button on the G15 version which while different, has not been a problem. The G15 is lighter and smaller than previous G models. I love it!
34946
Same. They are usually neck-and-neck, with the P7000 leaning more towards DSLR owners, and the G12 more towards point-and-shooters. However, since Amazon is selling the P7000 for ~$240 right now, there's no contest.
1668189
Both works fine. The only noticeable difference is in the range, I use the zoom a lot so for me it was worth the expense
755914
One reviewer says Vixia HF G10 owners won't find much reason to upgrade to the G20. The biggest differences are price (the G20 lists for $1099, while the G10 was about $1500), and much-improved low-light capability. Otherwise they're reportedly almost identical. I can't compare based on my own experience, but I *love* my G20!
2167640
A quick search of G700S model versus G700' turned up... "According the specs sheet, the higher DPI on the G700S is the only difference compared to G700." Deeper looking may uncover more info. I wasn't very fond of my G700 and happily replaced it. No malfunctions just felt like a cheap quality clunky mouse to me.
2180239
It looks like the TG-3 adds wifi and a focus stacking feature , newer image processor for whatever that's worth - true pic VII vs VI, 16 megapixel vs 12 , also an available macro flash. It appears largely the same. The wifi is nice because you can copy photos from the Camera to a phone directly without a card reader or laptop. Interestingly it looks like the back screen goes from OLED on the TG-2 to LCD on the TG-3, that might be a downgrade
453622
I concur with the answers given by Dean and Stephen. The positioning of the controls and the size in general are too different. I cannot agree with Dean's comment, however. I have been using this housing with my G11 for several years now, have traveld quite a bit with it, and am very satisified with both camera and housing.
262287
Without a doubt the Panasonic is a better deal and camera for the money ,I have both the G12 and the LX5 and the Panasonic wins hands down in almost all aspects. Just My op of course.
1020912
Yes, it was definitely worth the $35 upgrade. I went from a 3602 I had for four or five years and could tell an immediate difference. Do it!