Should I get the 200 or the 100, what's the difference?
1362386
I purchased the Gripper 200, and should have purchased the 100 along with it. The reasoning is that you use both grippers to push and guide the wood through your table saw or whatever without having to move the grippers constantly to re-adjust your stance. This give you better wood management on your band saw, and your other power tools where your hands may be.. I bought mine after I had cut off the tip of my index finger on my left hand. I did not have the stability of the gripper thereby "accidents happen." Save yourself the accident.
1362387
200 is more versatile. Nothing at all wrong with thee 100, but the 200 does provide more options.
1362388
Looked at both 100 and 200 and selected 200 due to all the additional features included.
1362389
Get the 200. The extras will be very useful and they are items you will eventually buy anyway.
523845
I think the 120 is more accurate. I do like them and they did great for what i needed.
20405
I had trouble with the 100, so I can't answer for the 200.I liked the look and feel of the case, but I just couldn't get to fit properly...probably my fault.
1576952
I needed the 200 and thats what I got. you would have to check that when you order them. I plan on ordering more they are great.
2060352
The 100i is open air, and are ok on a plane. The 200i have a slight noise isolation, but not as bassy as the 100i The 200i have better highs. With that said, that depends on your taste. For comfort, I like the 100i better. For noise isolation, I would go with the Klipsch Image One-Gen 2. I'm planning on getting them.
1175515
It will do 100s. I started with this one. I got tired of the rejects and went to kings and a powermatic II. I dont have rejects anymore.
2236000
If you want a touch screen vs pushing buttons. And the 620 also somehow calculates VO2 when wearing the HR monitor. So basically you are paying the extra for touch screen. So if it is worth it to you. Go for it. And if not save the extra 150 and spend it on some new shoes!
667184
It was the cost that made my decision, my girl friend has the 199 one and there isn't any real feature that her's does that mine won't. So I think they are pretty comparible with the exception of cost and color.
1998344
Smaller. The 100 is a 1.0 litre (600ml effective), meaning you can really only boil 0.6L. The 120 is 1.2 litre (800ml effective). So basically, the 100 is a 0.6L, and the 120 is a 0.8L. Totally straight-forward, right? ;) Anyhow, hope this helps!
2042912
Don't see why not. Double check on their website to be sure. I have the 200 as well.
671782
I have the 100 and it throws off 4000btu . I believe the 200 throws off 6000
1359333
The pl-200 is just an upgraded version. 250w rms amp compared to the bic f12s 150w rms. I own the f12 and an very impressed. If your budget allows the pl-200, go for it, but for 95% of people the f12 does a fantastic job.
1192318
I am extremely pleased with my 18-140. I do not own the 18-200, but I have handled it. The 18-140 is a bit lighter, and handles a bit quicker. It is sharper than my 18-105, especially at the wider focal lengths, where most pictures are taken.
1150053
Parties and weddings tend to be dark so the extra stop is welcomed. Also, the 85 is MUCH lighter in weight than the 80-200. If you're walking around all evening with that huge zoom on your camera that could make a difference. To me, I don't see where a 80-200 zoom is much use inside at a party or wedding. So I say go for the 85 f/1.8, you won't be sorry.
1758726
Looks like the ELPH 300 sports a wider angle lens (24mm) than the ELPH 100 (28mm) and a 5x zoom, vs. the 4x zoom on the ELPH 100. The back interface is also different. The 300 offers several more buttons, including one-touch video mode, and a 2.7" LCD screen. The 100 has fewer buttons and a 3" LCD screen. That 24mm lens sounds especially good to me. I also prefer more buttons vs. a larger screen, and obviously the 5x zoom is an advantage. I'm going to give the ELPH 300 a shot. EDIT: Also read that the 100 does not optically zoom during video, but I'm not sure of that. Worth checking out if it's important to you. I know the 300 supports optical zoom during video, which for me is important. Looks like the ELPH 300 sports a wider angle lens (24mm) than the ELPH 100 (28mm) and a 5x zoom, vs. the 4x zoom on the ELPH 100. The back interface is also different. The 300 offers several more buttons, including one-touch video mode, and a 2.7" LCD screen. The 100 has fewer buttons and a 3" LCD screen. That 24mm lens sounds especially good to me. I also prefer more buttons vs. a larger screen, and obviously the 5x zoom is an advantage. I'm going to give the ELPH 300 a shot. EDIT: Also read that the 100 does not optically zoom during video, but I'm not sure of that. Worth... » Read More Looks like the ELPH 300 sports a wider angle lens (24mm) than the ELPH 100 (28mm) and a 5x zoom, vs. the 4x zoom on the ELPH 100. The back interface is also different. The 300 offers several more buttons, including one-touch video mode, and a 2.7" LCD screen. The 100 has fewer buttons and a 3" LCD screen. That 24mm lens sounds especially good to me. I also prefer more buttons vs. a larger screen, and obviously the 5x zoom is an advantage. I'm going to give the ELPH 300 a shot. EDIT: Also read that the 100 does not optically zoom during video, but I'm not sure of that. Worth checking out if it's important to you. I know the 300 supports optical zoom during video, which for me is important. « Show Less
1109727
I bought the 150 and the 100. Both were advertised as the pro versions and I received the pro versions.
590149
I have the 100 and the 300 and the charger looks the same to me. But there could be a difference between them. Sorry I can't give you a better answer.