what does this mean "Exp. 6/14(1) & 7/14(1)"?
1395407
That's the expiration date or the last day they can be sold by retailer. However, the strips are still long after date date. I have used strips pass the expiration date and received accurate readings.
967884
It's increments of every one-half LB, displayed in 10ths. Example is 4.5....5.0....5.5....6.0, etc.
1379669
I think the period in the description is supposed to the a slash. Hence 1.2 = 1/2.
1192314
My order, received about 6 months ago, shows a "date" of 6/15. However, there is no explanation or indication that this notation actually represents any "date," either "production" or "use by" as there are no words accompanying these numbers. Having said that, I have been ordering this product from Amazon for a couple of years now, as it is no longer available in any store in my area. The product works just fine as expected.
2027778
I dont know exactly because I bought it for a friend but I think it's 1 1/2 from what I remember. Why do you ask?
1283289
nope..here they are ..in order.. .016=.406mm . . .017=.432mm . . .018=.457mm
1156956
Mine shows: exp 10/15. Production I'm not entirely sure of but I am guess it is this number: 042313 or in other words: April 2013.
1073602
Mark Eaker's response is correct. The /37 refers to the languages the box is printed in. A /17 would be English, Spanish. A /27 is English, French and Spanish. The product is the same.
1842964
Exp. date on these is 08/14, so they are clearing them out. Great deal if you plan to use them in the next 6 months or so.
1520541
hi，not ,but pls notice the exp, i buy them ,but the exp ：2014.8 ，not refund money
1342384
1=?; 2=224, 22/250, 240 weath, 243, etc; 3=22 savage, 6.6 x 55 mauser, etc; there's a lot of calibers represented by these holders, too many to enumerate in this space. There is an application chart that comes with the pkg. Ck Lee's site.
789520
Thanks for your comment. I was going to purchase this, however seeing as how all of the information entered was the same sans age and you got two very different answers, this calculator seems faulty.
2112879
It looks suspiciously like a decimal point is moved for some reason. I am not a Dr. but I'd wonder if 161/109 were valid reading (not one that you want, I'm only guessing at the concidence.
818403
Second thought,,,, if you scribed the angle at two readings of 13.7 than at 13.8, using dividers bisect between those two lines you will end up with a 13.75 angle
2032047
If you look at the Phillips site, it says the 38% was replaced by the 14. Take a look for a full explanation
2210877
Sorry. This sounds like a mathematical calculation to me, Good luck in figuring it out.
1520542
hi&#65292;not ,but pls notice the exp, i buy them ,but the exp &#65306;2014.8 &#65292;not refund money