How tall is it when used as a monopod?
1390943
Quick and dirty: 50" to the base plate. You can also remove the center post and use it to extend the monopod to give 68" to the base plate.
1390944
I use the monopod in two modes, the first of its fullest extent and the second in his extencion minimum, these two modes are useful for photography and video.
2212202
Specs say 14.1 ounces...I don't know if this is correct. The monopod with head is significantly lighter than a similar model from manfrotto.
630159
It would probably do so, fits standard threads, I have it on a Vortex tripod. HOWEVER, it's pretty stout...so it would probably be pretty heavy for a monopod.
1185037
This tripod is approximatey 1'5" long when closed. BTW, this is a fantastic tripod.
976388
61" from the mounting plate to the foot (spike not extended). I used it recently as a walking staff on a a tough hike with 2000 vertical feet of elevation change over very rough terrain. It functioned perfectly as a staff and a monopod. Bullet proof ,IMHO
2262712
Height range of the mount head and tripod is 42" to 55". I'm not sure about the max height of the tripod alone, the legs can be extended about one foot from the most compact configuration.
1715832
This is a Solid monopod, for a big person, I'm 6'4. That being said, it's about 21" so depending on the backpack, it might fit. Camera backpacks are usualy smaller so you might have some trouble there. It comes with it's own case. Hope this helps.
1519356
I'm not familiar with your tripod, but if it currently holds a fluid head then it may be possible. I think this head is a bit large to use with a monopod but thats just my preference to go as light as possible on monopods. I think for the $, this is a decent head and a good investment. If you get it and realize that it won't work with your legs, I think upgrading to a beefier set of legs is the better alternative to going with a different head. But obviously it depends on what you need it for.If you plan on using it in the monopod configuration then this head may make your setup a bit top heavy. I'm not familiar with your tripod, but if it currently holds a fluid head then it may be possible. I think this head is a bit large to use with a monopod but thats just my preference to go as light as possible on monopods. I think for the $, this is a decent head and a good investment. If you get it and realize that it won't work with your legs, I think upgrading to a beefier set of legs is the better alternative to going with a different head. But obviously it depends on what you need it for.If you plan on using it in the monopod configuration then this head may make your setup a bit top... » Read More I'm not familiar with your tripod, but if it currently holds a fluid head then it may be possible. I think this head is a bit large to use with a monopod but thats just my preference to go as light as possible on monopods. I think for the $, this is a decent head and a good investment. If you get it and realize that it won't work with your legs, I think upgrading to a beefier set of legs is the better alternative to going with a different head. But obviously it depends on what you need it for.If you plan on using it in the monopod configuration then this head may make your setup a bit top heavy. « Show Less
1519355
I'm not familiar with your tripod, but if it currently holds a fluid head then it may be possible. I think this head is a bit large to use with a monopod but thats just my preference to go as light as possible on monopods. I think for the $, this is a decent head and a good investment. If you get it and realize that it won't work with your legs, I think upgrading to a beefier set of legs is the better alternative to going with a different head. But obviously it depends on what you need it for.If you plan on using it in the monopod configuration then this head may make your setup a bit top heavy.
1199051
The tripod is not tall at all, it was made to be use on top of a table. Is less than 1 feet tall
662534
Not exactly sure how tall it is without getting it out. However, it's not as tall as my professional Photography Tripods. It's adequate and works alright, but is rather lightweight. Not entirely displeased with it, but it could be a bit better. For the money, it's acceptable.
818559
Don't have it in front of me at the moment but its not tall.. Not full size tripod..
1982711
the unit is about 6 1/2 inches tall but you have to remove the ball or mount from the existing tripod. took me about 5 minutes
2275969
Gitzo site has it at 1.65 lbs. It feels very light but sturdy. I use it on a Canon 300/4 and 400/2.8. The monopod is very stable, even at its longest height. The last section is thin compared to the other sections but I constantly get sharp pictures shooting soccer. It easily fits in a sachel type bag. I would say if you shoot with long lens this is a must. The legs very quickly unlock and the top of the monopod will hold any lens. If you use a tripod head on top besure it is big enough other wise the range of motion will be limited.
1938857
You're not doing anything wrong. The ball head receptical is 3/8", but your monopod is most likely the standard 1/4". I don't get it myself. However, you just need a cheap adapter: uxcell 1/4" to 3/8" Camera Convert Screw Adapter for Tripod Monopod That's what did it for me.
1391315
I don't think it will work. I own a monopod and it doesn't fit in, the tripod head's thread is too big. Monopods usually have a 1/4" screw (that's the size of most cameras at their bottom hole). The product has a 3/8" base, it's larger and won't be good enough to make an extra long selfie stick with your monopod. The tripod head has worked beautifully on other applications though.
2249771
It has a standard screw mount, like any tri-pod...but it's not really a 'monopod' to speak, more an extension bar...it works perfect for little point & shoot cameras, like the Power Shot. It should work fine. (but I don't think it works so good as a monopod, it lacks the stability of the 'foot') :)