Kodak Z612 vs. Canon A630
1387956
I am not real happy with the Kodak. Their older models are better. Thinking of returning and getting the FugiFilm s5200 Better report with PC World. check out the canon ratings on this website. www.pcworld.com
1288378
the series 3+ for sure [ i have one] and another one, just check the kodak site , and look at Z series for compatibility, I bought mine on a special at compgeeks for like 40 bucks. [refurb] and so far its flawless. Mostly bought it to charge the camera, search ebay for klic-8000 batteries. Bought like 3 on there for as little as 89cents.!
333274
I've used a Canon A80 for the last three years (just bought the 710 this weekend) and have had excellent luck with it as an underwater camera. True you have to wait about four seconds while the photo is being stored to the disk, but it gave me time to decide weather or not I wanted to keep it (and believe me, I junked plenty of shots, anenome fish are not cooperative subjects.) I took the 710 into my pool (with the housing, of course) and found the shutter lag to be almost un-noticeable. I almost always use flash u/w, so I find the time waiting for next shot delay was a non-problem (have to wait for the flash to build up again). I was particularly impressed with the macro photos. My little $400 setup took comparable macro photos to my buddies who were using housed SLR's with twin strobe setups. I'm not sure what happened with your memory card (unformatted) but I think you'll be happy with the 710.
50325
Actually A620 vs. SD700 is like apples and oranges. A few differences are resolution (8mp vs. 6mp), body type (pro-style vs. pocket style), and LCD type(flip and swivel vs. stationary). There are many more differences but these are some of the main ones.
434491
Hi, As far as I know they never set the Zi12 in full production. This listing is legit however, the product exists, so someone probably got hold of the few(?) ones that were actually made. If you buy it (like I did) there will be no support from Kodak or firmware updates etc. The camera in itself is wonderful and works perfectly though!
1935411
dear friendfrom my experience Nikon d3100 is much better than sony a390 I have the both camera and I am more satisfied with nikon
2053309
The ZS20 is generally considered very inferior in image quality when compared to *anything else*. ZS15 would be better if you want a pocketable camera.
839014
I have both cameras (z915 and z950) and I would say that the main thing you get with the z950 over the z915 is manual focus and HD video. The 12 mp resolution on the z950 is not significantly better than the 10 mp of the z915, nor is the Schnieder-Kruznach lens on the z950 noticably better than the Retinar lens on the z915. The VGA video on the z915 looks great on non-HD TV sets. Since the z915 can be had for about $130, as opposed to $180 for the z950, I'd say the z915 offers more bang for the buck.
1089979
I also had an earlier Kodak DX model and am extremely disappointed with the relatively blurry pictures that the Z812IS produces. I have had the camera 6 weeks and I am sending the camera to Kodak for a possible warranty repair. No setting I tried, and I've tried most, will get rid of the blur. For a recent family event, I brought out the old reliable DX. Heart broken is not quite the word I would use to describe - frustrated is more like. Also - buyer be aware from an Amazon vendor, you only have 10 days to return the camera for a refund.
1512619
The only important difference is that the 6140 has a SCSI connection while the 6130 does not. Originally we were told the 6130 did not have TWAIN compatibility but TWAIN works great on it.
1857605
Mr. Wong, it's not necessary to go up in ISO to take indoor, low light pictures. A simple $20 tripod will do what's needed. The A630 is perfectly capable and takes a very good low light picture.
2136213
I am still looking.... Actually I own the Canon PowerShot A720. This is a wonderful and inexpensive well built camera but .... The responding time is too long for taking picture of children. I use it to take picture of my littler daughter and most of the time I need to shoot several to get the best one.
1051430
Both the Canon A610 and A620 have smaller screens. They also have the drawback of ISO only to 400. The Canon A540 pushes the ISO to 800 which is important for getting the photo in lower lght levels with less chance of camera "shake". The movable screen on the A620 intriqued me but them I really did not see a pressing need for it. The 620 has a longer zoom range, but again the more compact size of the A540 won the day. The A620 takes 4 AA batteries and that adds to the bulk and weight. Again, the A540 won the day because I wanted a high function, pocketable camera. I hope this helps you. Both the Canon A610 and A620 have smaller screens. They also have the drawback of ISO only to 400. The Canon A540 pushes the ISO to 800 which is important for getting the photo in lower lght levels with less chance of camera "shake". The movable screen on the A620 intriqued me but them I really did not see a pressing need for it. The 620 has a longer zoom range, but again the more compact size of the A540 won the day. The A620 takes 4 AA batteries and that adds to the bulk and weight. Again, the A540 won the day because I wanted a high function, pocketable camera. I hope this... » Read More Both the Canon A610 and A620 have smaller screens. They also have the drawback of ISO only to 400. The Canon A540 pushes the ISO to 800 which is important for getting the photo in lower lght levels with less chance of camera "shake". The movable screen on the A620 intriqued me but them I really did not see a pressing need for it. The 620 has a longer zoom range, but again the more compact size of the A540 won the day. The A620 takes 4 AA batteries and that adds to the bulk and weight. Again, the A540 won the day because I wanted a high function, pocketable camera. I hope this helps you. « Show Less
2073642
I do not know the answer to your question directly, but I can tell you the A 646 was not a satisfactory device. It failed way too early in its life and was slow to operate. We have found camera store machines to be a better approach, especially since the bulk of our photo production is now computer based.
1721527
GET THE Z950 NOW! The price listed today (6/15) is crazy! Sorry I'm excited lol, 139.99 is awesome. I've been eyeing this camera for a while. I'm all in for this price and free two day shipping for non prime members is bacon on the burger....... Back on topic! The z915 uses AA batteries so the more you spend for batteries the longer they will last and there's some decent rechargeables out there. The z950 uses this Kodak KLIC-7003 Li-lon Rechargeable Battery and I think it last for about 250 shots. I like the z950 battery option more but I'm no camera pro so hopefully someone has better advice for ya.
1569662
I think it is a no brainer...I just took the Zi8 back to Target with a resounding: "I hate this video camera." The software is the worst. I thought I was watching a 1950's home movie as it jerked it's way through the frames. Also, the auido and visual were not in sinc...I hope it is not too late to keep you from buying the Kodak. Maybe other's have had better luck. I just bought the Flip Mino HD and like it alot. Software is a snap....None of these low end videos are great in low lighting or with a zoom. All have their drawbacks but for the bucks and easibility, I think worth it.
1641805
In addition to what others have mentioned, the MP830 prints all documents faster than the MP780. The Mp830 includes a camera card reader and a colour display.The cartridges on the MP830 are chipped, making it much harder for third party ink companies to produce refilled ink cartridges.