is this accurate becasuse it will be on me and my wife ccw shield that we carry. we need it because when your under stress it's hard to shoot
1382422
Yes, it is very accurate. The sight are very good and recoil is minimal. It's reasonably size to try ccw, and incredibly smooth when shooting.
1382423
I haven't had a chance to shot with it yet on my 40 but I also have the same one on my 9mm and it seems accurate. I'm just guessing that in a life or death situation a person wouldn't think about using the laser and just using the sights. I'm guessing a person would have to think about hitting the laser button to turn it on the find your target. It's just one more step a person would need to do before aiming at a target. This is just my opinion.
1382424
Yes, it is accurate. You also have the ability to 'zero' your alignment with windage (east-west) and elevation (north-south). I am ex-para-military and law enforcement.
1382425
Yes, after sighting the Laser Max in, it is very accurate. The fact that it is in front of the pistol is good also so that you do not block the laser with your finger as happens with some side mounted lasers. Just practice drawing and turning on the laser so that it becomes one movement, practice, practice, practice.
518975
It would depend on how you wish to wear it. I'm a right-handed shooter and I wear it on my right hip at the 4 o'clock position with the mag well to the rear. I absolutely love this holster from that draw. I carry my full-size H&K; P30 and numbers of people have commented on how well I conceal a full-size pistol IWB. If you were going to carry an inverted draw, this may be a tough holster for that. Also, I would not recommend a soft holster like this if you have a trigger - mounted safety such as the Glocks or my new VP9. I strongly recommend a more rigid holster for those types of pistols simply to prevent inadvertent firing when reholstering.I hope this helps you choose. It would depend on how you wish to wear it. I'm a right-handed shooter and I wear it on my right hip at the 4 o'clock position with the mag well to the rear. I absolutely love this holster from that draw. I carry my full-size H&K; P30 and numbers of people have commented on how well I conceal a full-size pistol IWB. If you were going to carry an inverted draw, this may be a tough holster for that. Also, I would not recommend a soft holster like this if you have a trigger - mounted safety such as the Glocks or my new VP9. I strongly recommend a more rigid holster for those types of pistols... » Read More It would depend on how you wish to wear it. I'm a right-handed shooter and I wear it on my right hip at the 4 o'clock position with the mag well to the rear. I absolutely love this holster from that draw. I carry my full-size H&K; P30 and numbers of people have commented on how well I conceal a full-size pistol IWB. If you were going to carry an inverted draw, this may be a tough holster for that. Also, I would not recommend a soft holster like this if you have a trigger - mounted safety such as the Glocks or my new VP9. I strongly recommend a more rigid holster for those types of pistols simply to prevent inadvertent firing when reholstering.I hope this helps you choose. « Show Less
347764
The only thing that bothers me about the holster is that after wearing it for awhile, it needs to be re-adjusted..... fitting screw has to be tightened. No big deal, just that the gun could be removed from holster too easily if it becomes loose. I guess a little bit of loctite might fix that problem. Otherwise... it is a nice holster for the money.
2235566
Yes. The Acog is way more accurate than I can shoot. If you are a great shot you will want to check the bullet drop indicators for the ammo you shoot. I zero at 200 yds and that covers my needs. Note: it is one the finest scopes I've ever seen and is indestructible.
295106
No its good. The holster is cheap, I suggest you find a replacement, but make sure you order a size bigger than you think.
39078
Is it slow to draw? Compared to having your CCW of choice holstered on your hip- Yes. Is it still a better option than not having it at all? Without question. Unless someone OWNS this particular backpack then it is very unlikely that a pick-pocket will know that you are even carrying anything in the hidden compartment. To me the question posed tells me that you are not the type who would typically carry a backpack and thus you wouldn't have much need for an option like this to carry your CCW. However for someone who has to wear business professional attire (tucked in dress shirt and slacks) this is a good option because the need is likely there to have something to keep all your documents/work necessities in and would alleviate the need to constantly keep your suit jacket on so that people would not see the butt of a pistol sticking out of your waistband. I used this backpack almost daily and knowing I had the option to have my CCW somewhat handy and did not need to have it on my hip was a great benefit. Also it is a nice way to carry it while traveling, I could pack almost two days worth of clothes in the bag and I also had someplace to put it in my car so that if I were carrying and got pulled over for anything I would not have to declare that I was carrying to the officer because it was in the backseat out of reach.
678480
Yes. It may be a bit loose though making it difficult to pull the mags out especially in high stress situations.
860899
Yes, and it is comfortable.. the release strap is a little funky, but I like mine. It's way better than the ones you put inside your pants, that rub the heck out of you. Yes it's not a quick draw, but other than out in the open holsters, I don't see that any of them are quick. I get my glock out just fine, just needed to play with the snap.
32522
I don't think it will be a problem. Wear it low like a gunfighter and it should clear easily. This is an excellent holster. Good heavy leather with heavy stitching. Most of the stuff in this price range is flimsy cheap stuff (even the Ruger one). I was absolutely delighted with the quality and the custom fit.
1149952
This unit relies on a pretty concentric barrel end (be it muzzle, muzzle brake, or flash suppressor) to be maximally accurate. However, on a typical setup, it is definitely close enough to get you "on paper" reliably. This is especially true if you use their software to print weapon-specific sighting patterns. I recently sighted my 7mm Rem Mag to within 2 MOA at 200 yards. However, I have found that the part of the device that goes into the barrel is too short to actually reach the barrel with big muzzle brakes (like on my 338 Lapua). In that case, you're better off removing the brake and laser sighting, then reinstalling the brake. This unit relies on a pretty concentric barrel end (be it muzzle, muzzle brake, or flash suppressor) to be maximally accurate. However, on a typical setup, it is definitely close enough to get you "on paper" reliably. This is especially true if you use their software to print weapon-specific sighting patterns. I recently sighted my 7mm Rem Mag to within 2 MOA at 200 yards. However, I have found that the part of the device that goes into the barrel is too short to actually reach the barrel with big muzzle brakes (like on my 338 Lapua). In that case, you're better off removing... » Read More This unit relies on a pretty concentric barrel end (be it muzzle, muzzle brake, or flash suppressor) to be maximally accurate. However, on a typical setup, it is definitely close enough to get you "on paper" reliably. This is especially true if you use their software to print weapon-specific sighting patterns. I recently sighted my 7mm Rem Mag to within 2 MOA at 200 yards. However, I have found that the part of the device that goes into the barrel is too short to actually reach the barrel with big muzzle brakes (like on my 338 Lapua). In that case, you're better off removing the brake and laser sighting, then reinstalling the brake. « Show Less
970981
Good morning G. Harris. I think the Shield may be a bit thin for the size 12 holster that we purchased for our XD Sub-Compacts. The M&P; 9/40 may be just right though.
2109904
Pretty accurate. However, the problem is that the device is flimsy. Unless you're shooting a .22, it isn't up to the task of withstanding recoil.
1705950
Not sure since I am not in familiar with how real they need the weapon to look. If you cover the red tip and don't take close film shots, it has a pretty authentic look. Additionally, it's weight is closer to reality than other practice weapons I have worked with.
2281787
You can, it'll help save you some ammo. It's accurate, but there is a little play. I would only trust it 7 to 10 yards.
1036596
From what I read and what I physically see the sights will hang over the edge since the regular M&P; 9/9c are wider than the shield. I have seen people do it but you may have issues with it being snagged in clothing or holster.
27022
I don't know,I always wear it with the light. Be patient it takes a while to break the holster in. It is very tight. I started by putting the unloaded pistol a couple of plastic sandwich baggies let it sit over night then added a couple of more and related that prices several times up to six baggies. Now the gun is snug but not so tight it pulls my pants up when I try to draw the gun. Enjoy
908914
Yes it is accurate and my husband has killed many squirrels. It is loud when we used it for Kindle he first few weeks but then it started getting lower and lower, but this was stated in the manual. This is a very good rifle. I think it will fit your needs very nicely.