1084 and 1085 what is the different between 210-1084 and 210-1085? i.e., blue and blue-faster wireless?
126240
What does that mean? I am looking at the mini 210-1084NR . What is Wireless G ?
126241
there are three kinds of wi-fi b, g, and n, listed in order of how good they are. Most places still support b & G but N is the wave of the future. You probably won't notice the difference now, but over time you will.
811570
Hmmm - online search yielded an owners manual that says it is: Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR (Enhanced Data Rate). I'm not much help beyond that.
1004781
NOT SURE, Robert . . . I was on Century Link with a Westell model and the 600N really 'blows-it-away', SIMPLY WITH A MUCH NOTICEABLE INCREASE IN SPEED. I use mine 'hard-wired' with my iMac and MagicJack using 2 of the 4 Ethernet ports. Now, "ASSUMING" that ATT and basically ALL 'PROVIDERS' use the products that 'win' their 'bid' at the LOWEST cost, (like NASA), I have to "ASSUME" it may be of the same, LOW PERFORMANCE as what I originally had. I used theirs for the FREE, one-year period, and got this IMMEDIATELY afterward. But, unlike NASA, selecting the LOW-BID / MEETING MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS products isn't gonna "KILL" anyone! I am glad / happy with my choice, NOT being a 'techie' or 'geek'. - Jay NOT SURE, Robert . . . I was on Century Link with a Westell model and the 600N really 'blows-it-away', SIMPLY WITH A MUCH NOTICEABLE INCREASE IN SPEED. I use mine 'hard-wired' with my iMac and MagicJack using 2 of the 4 Ethernet ports. Now, "ASSUMING" that ATT and basically ALL 'PROVIDERS' use the products that 'win' their 'bid' at the LOWEST cost, (like NASA), I have to "ASSUME" it may be of the same, LOW PERFORMANCE as what I originally had. I used theirs for the FREE, one-year period, and got this IMMEDIATELY afterward. But, unlike NASA, selecting the LOW-BID /... » Read More NOT SURE, Robert . . . I was on Century Link with a Westell model and the 600N really 'blows-it-away', SIMPLY WITH A MUCH NOTICEABLE INCREASE IN SPEED. I use mine 'hard-wired' with my iMac and MagicJack using 2 of the 4 Ethernet ports. Now, "ASSUMING" that ATT and basically ALL 'PROVIDERS' use the products that 'win' their 'bid' at the LOWEST cost, (like NASA), I have to "ASSUME" it may be of the same, LOW PERFORMANCE as what I originally had. I used theirs for the FREE, one-year period, and got this IMMEDIATELY afterward. But, unlike NASA, selecting the LOW-BID / MEETING MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS products isn't gonna "KILL" anyone! I am glad / happy with my choice, NOT being a 'techie' or 'geek'. - Jay « Show Less
52407
I'm sorry, I'm not familiar with the blue one at all. I don't know how it compares.
1511058
Certainly the GL is a better model, but unless users really want to hack their routers and don't care if they void the warranty, this version (v5-v7) is good enough for most purposes.I would go to the Linksys website and get the latest firmware, and possibly upgrade the antennas if necessary.
2278988
I am not sure if there is a difference. Mine is a 4G and I seem to get 4G speeds with it on AT&T.
1487048
I apologize I'm not sure. I'm using 802.11n which has a greater range and is also faster than 802.11g.
2002663
It's either/or depending on the network that you choose. one will say "networkname" and the other "networkname.5GHz"
163596
AJB, you are correct that they are not the same, they are indeed quite different. You hit on almost all of the differences, here are the other two: - the 1005PE-MU17 has 802.11 b/g/n whereas the 1001P-PU17 has 802.11 b/g - the 1001P-PU17 has Bluetooth and the 1005PE-MU17 does not
723718
Judging by the maximum throughput listed under specs, it is the 1.2 version. There is a 1.3 version coming later this year (good for 8K).
660350
I don't think there's a significant difference. Both seem to work well enough for me. If you have problems with wireless radio reception, you might suspect your radio firmware, your ROM, or your phone's logic board.
2014848
As far as I know the main difference is the number of simultaneous VPN tunnels. But both these routers shouldn't be an option as they're both EOL. The WRVS4400N has been replaced by the RV180W and the RV220W is being replace by the RV320W but IMHO the support for these small business routers is crap. There are still a lot of known bugs not solved for the RV220W....
884230
I just bought this model yesterday (1/28) @ Bestbuy and the AC Wireless works well and does support both 2.4 / 5 ghz bands. I was connected at 240 mbps with only 3/5 bars signal strength and had no issues at all (unsure of what the difs are between the bestbuy version and the amazon product featured here)
2176737
Because I have no personal experience with this combination, I must refer you to someone else. The AWUS036H supports 802.11 b/g (11 and 54 megabit) service. The AWUS036NH also supports those but adds support for 802.11n (150 megabit) service.
1521601
The older unit is the same as the newer one. I am not sure what changes were made. I have the older unit and bought the newer unit for my son. As far as I can tell, they are the same. It may be internal or in the software. I did see the older unit has a better description and a view of the back of the unit. Both units include 1080p output.
1431080
It's been replaced by the Cisco-Linksys E3000.Cisco-Linksys E3000 Wireless-N Router^ That's definitely the router I want to get to start my wireless experience.
353223
Both routers look great and meet my requirements.SlikLizrd, can you specify how much is one better than the other for:- Wired and Wireless performance- Wireless Range- NAS performance- Media Server performanceThanks