What is the difference between 40X amd 52X?
1381008
Mary,The X is the recording speed like two of the other commentators answeredIn my opinion either would work fine for you. Unless you are going to do some fancy stuff. The faster the X factor (if your PC and software can run that fast, the faster the system will burn your CD.) In my experience your software generally will adjust it to the proper speed. I have never had to set my recording speed on my software. It selects the proper speed for each burn and asks if it is okay. If you do get a bad burn it will tell youjack
1381009
It means the "recording speed". I always set my CD burner at 24X. Just something I have done since the beginning! May all your burns be good!Lester
1381010
Mary, The X is the recording speed like two of the other commentators answered In my opinion either would work fine for you. Unless you are going to do some fancy stuff. The faster the X factor (if your PC and software can run that fast, the faster the system will burn your CD.) In my experience your software generally will adjust it to the proper speed. I have never had to set my recording speed on my software. It selects the proper speed for each burn and asks if it is okay. If you do get a bad burn it will tell you jack
1381011
Anyone burning at anything faster than the slowest possible speed is a mo-ron asking for a plastic coaster.
1381012
I believe it's the write speed that the CD is able to handle. Just to be on the safe side, I always lower the write speed to around 24x and sometimes 16x when burning a disc. That helps minimize errors.
1381013
One is capable of recording 40 times normal speed, and one 52 times normal speed.
1639695
Not much of a difference just remote codes and color led nothing too happy about 570.4x is a good alarm. Why pay a few for bucks for 2 letters saying hd.
1678424
Can't seem to find any difference between the two. Both come with 2011/136x/115x part. Both look visually the same, both have the same pump. Perhaps just a different naming code from the factory? I would buy the $50 one. I have it, and it runs like a beaut.
1645860
Hey RobertFrom image itself I don't see there is much difference... I guess 8x42 having only one type so you should be good to purchase the other one @180$. I got it in 150$ while massive discounts going on Amazon and even I got 50$ rebate coupon from Vanguard so it same in 100$ .I hope I answers your question
1243595
Also the 4065F has 10 bit conversion compared to the 8 bit processing in the 4061F. I believe this means that up conversion from lower resolution sources is superior...less grainy with better color.
2104158
One is Superclocked and for the money is better to get from EVGA IMHO... it will not make a WORLD of difference but EVGA Superclocked Edition still runs very cool and no extra power needed... and will give just ever so slightly smoother gameplay.... I almost always buy the EVGA Superclocks because the price isn't usually anymore and even SOMETIMES less than standard!!! Plus I dont' like to Overclock myself so the little extra that a product can be overclocked will come out of the boxed overclocked.
834190
4790 by slightly, it would more so depend on your gpu and ram. It's comes down to additional price vs slight performance increase.
2116708
In my opinion A8-4500M is better. It has 4 MB of L2 cache which doubles the 2 MB of the A4-6210. And the graphics card are faster. You can see it here: http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/896/AMD_A4-Series_for_Notebooks_A4-6210_vs_AMD_A8-Series_for_Notebooks_A8-4500M.html
1234075
The information I have from my distributor say Radeon HD 8400. I've never opened one up so I can't confirm for certain.
880344
I just bought the 45 and the only difference I saw between the two at the store was that the 65 has a digital display. I'm really happy with the 45 and I don't think it is worth the extra money. Also, check at your local stores before you order because I got mine from Kohls and there was a $50 rebate included.
1000174
As long as correct architecture only difference I can see is 1.5 to 2x price multiplier. I bought these for an old optiplex I made into a server and worked fine but took out and put in parents dimmention. It needed it more. No problems. Like a shot of b12 to the old desktop
196649
Hey there!!! good question. The x series have a slightly better timing. If you look at the normal XL($77.99) the timing stats read 9-9-9-24 and then if you look at the RL($89.99) the timing reads 9-9-9-24-2N. Now this may seem like a small difference but the main issue is with speed. 2N just means its a little faster and a little more stable, this is quite minuscule. Now I purchased the XL($77.99) for a gaming rig I was building at the time and I can tell you first hand that the RAM is flawless. I never had any issues with Windows 8 or Windows 7 and on top of that I ran the RAM overclocked 24/7 for about 4 months straight playing various games with heavy graphical mod enhancements such as CoD Ghosts and GTA: IV. If you want to get the best of the best go for the RL($89.99), but if you want to save a little cash I promise you there's very little difference, I actually doubt one would be able to tell the difference.
1309297
A cursory look at the specs looks the same to me, but to be honest I have not looked that closely at the 6411. They seem to have the same size hard drive, same amount of RAM, same size/weight/resolution. I'm not sure about the processor. They are both i5s though, so at the very least, they are out comparable speed and energy consumption.
1020316
This is actually a 7970 ghz edition card rebranded as a 280x. So it is much better than a 270x. You can crossfire a 280x with a 7970 ghz or even a 270x or below down to a 7850 card. That makes this card very versatile. I have two 280x's in crossfire powering three 27 inch 2560x1440 monitors in eyefinity. 45fps in crysis 3 on ultra. Very smooth. I love this card especially the price.
509437
I don't know, but I will tell you that the 3500 ndx is garbage it overheated on me stopped working I sent it back when it was returned to me,that same day I installed it and it started smoking. Do not get it, if you have one send it back that's just my opinion
26666
If you look on The zxox web page you will see the technical differences. However, practically, the simple answer is it is bigger. With the larger tv's it provides a stable base with absolutely incredible sound and clarity. Try it, you will be impressed. Trust me.
919865
This is a question best directed to the manufacturer. Go to AMD's web site and ask your question there.