What's the difference between this model ASD51W and older Denon ASD3w? Other than the shape of the unit and the fact that the ASD51W is newer (and more expensive), I don't see much difference between the ASD51W and older Denon ASD3w. Does anyone know any other differences?Denon ASD-3W Wifi Network iPod Dock (Black) What's the difference between this model ASD51W and older Denon ASD3w? Other than the shape of the unit and the fact that the ASD51W is newer (and more expensive), I don't see much... » Read More What's the difference between this model ASD51W and older Denon ASD3w? Other than the shape of the unit and the fact that the ASD51W is newer (and more expensive), I don't see much difference between the ASD51W and older Denon ASD3w. Does anyone know any other differences?Denon ASD-3W Wifi Network iPod Dock (Black) « Show Less
462414
did you ever get an answer to this question? and do you know if you can stream itunes with either one?
1917218
I have not seen any difference other than a little different styling. A different year perhaps? It sounds the same and it has the same on/off switch, volume controls, etc.
2121884
I have the RTI4 and RTIA3 and love them both. I think the RTIA3's require a more capable receiver to power them which may explain why 3rdGen thought they didn't sound as good. I have mine biamped with the Denon 3808 and they sound spectacular. There are times when I listen to them thinking I couldn't possibly imagine a better sounding speaker for the kind of music I mostly listen to, which is minimal electro.
1157238
I believe it is just a difference in color. But by the way it does work well and I have had no issues with the unit... Good luck!!!
1963286
The one that I bought is A2, however I really didn't like this model. I had the DWA-140 before and accidentally broke it, so I figured this should be an improvement, however the DWA-140 would pick up the wireless signal a lot better than this model.
14938
I was in the market for a new AVR earlier this year. I bought a Sony locally on sale and returned it as I wasn't happy with the sound. I ran it side by side with an older Denon and just felt the Denon produced clearer, more natural sound with both movies and CDs I know well. Even though the Sony had the features I wanted, the sound quality just wasn't there to my ears and I bought a new Denon. If you can, take a CD you know well to a stereo shop and try a side by side comparason for yourself (with the same speakers or headphones.) You may find you prefer one or the other. After all, isn't the sound quality the most important attribute? I was in the market for a new AVR earlier this year. I bought a Sony locally on sale and returned it as I wasn't happy with the sound. I ran it side by side with an older Denon and just felt the Denon produced clearer, more natural sound with both movies and CDs I know well. Even though the Sony had the features I wanted, the sound quality just wasn't there to my ears and I bought a new Denon. If you can, take a CD you know well to a stereo shop and try a side by side comparason for yourself (with the same speakers or headphones.) You may find you prefer one or the other. After all, isn't... » Read More I was in the market for a new AVR earlier this year. I bought a Sony locally on sale and returned it as I wasn't happy with the sound. I ran it side by side with an older Denon and just felt the Denon produced clearer, more natural sound with both movies and CDs I know well. Even though the Sony had the features I wanted, the sound quality just wasn't there to my ears and I bought a new Denon. If you can, take a CD you know well to a stereo shop and try a side by side comparason for yourself (with the same speakers or headphones.) You may find you prefer one or the other. After all, isn't the sound quality the most important attribute? « Show Less
1255611
The only difference is the color. The way you can tell the wifi model is the price goes up about a hundered bucks. Very similar part number but there is an extra letter in the wifi model. I got the non wifi unit. Sweet camera thus far.
302229
We can only guess why... Odd that this device is still up on the TDK web site though... Looks like the new version will be the TREK 360 coming Spring of 2014 There are many of these type devices on the market now so maybe they have the new version up to specs for full wireless use. I will also say that since the V513 is NOT wireless as they advertised it to be and needs to be plugged into an AC power source.... that might be a reason for it to fail in the market. Don't like the fact that you have to have the V513 plugged into an AC outlet, but do like the sound and performance otherwise. If you have to be limited by one wire you might as well get their other 77000015410 Sound Cube "wired" version that has more features. Just my opinion of course. They also have a couple wireless units; http://www.amazon.com/TDK-Life-Record-Wireless-Boombox/dp/B008VMT2DK/ref=sr_sp-atf_title_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1391785333&sr=8-1&keywords=tdk+Wireless+Boombox http://www.amazon.com/TDK-Life-Record-Bluetooth-Wireless/dp/B00BBA3QU4/ref=sr_sp-btf_title_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1391785956&sr=8-2-fkmr1&keywords=tdk+TREK+360
2132918
Dear Carlos, Thanks for your inquiry. The main addition to the AVR1610 is Bluetooth, which many people prefer over airplay. The AVR1700 is last year's model and the AVR1610 is newer, which many people prefer as well. The AVR1710 has replaced the AVR1700 in the Harman Kardon line. Please let me know if I can be of any additional assistance. Regards, Eric Cohen World Wide Stereo
2185024
Sony website just had the 350 for $150 yesterday, not having any fancy hookups (just using the sony front speakers) I can't justify the difference in cost. However, I appreciate the simple and clear reply given to the original question and will refer back to it when choosing a new BD player and sound setup. Espcially if trying to get more life out of our old (sony) receiver.From what I understand of the answer, if the setup is more modern, it would not make any difference which player.
1030546
1. As stated by Mr. Hanson, it is an older package. 2. The satellite speakers on the 600 have a mid/range radiator on top. Evidently their bookshelf answer to their bi-polar drivers of the BP series.3. Subwoofer on the 600 has a 250 watt amp where as the 60.6 only has a 150 watt.That being said, I own the 60.6 and I am extremely happy. I use them with a Denon AVR-2310. If you have a larger than 400 sq ft theater space I would consider a second or more powerful sub. But at the current $219 (which is hilarious as the sub itself sells for $299) I see the set going for, its kind of hard to go wrong. 1. As stated by Mr. Hanson, it is an older package. 2. The satellite speakers on the 600 have a mid/range radiator on top. Evidently their bookshelf answer to their bi-polar drivers of the BP series.3. Subwoofer on the 600 has a 250 watt amp where as the 60.6 only has a 150 watt.That being said, I own the 60.6 and I am extremely happy. I use them with a Denon AVR-2310. If you have a larger than 400 sq ft theater space I would consider a second or more powerful sub. But at the current $219 (which is hilarious as the sub itself sells for $299) I see the set going for,... » Read More 1. As stated by Mr. Hanson, it is an older package. 2. The satellite speakers on the 600 have a mid/range radiator on top. Evidently their bookshelf answer to their bi-polar drivers of the BP series.3. Subwoofer on the 600 has a 250 watt amp where as the 60.6 only has a 150 watt.That being said, I own the 60.6 and I am extremely happy. I use them with a Denon AVR-2310. If you have a larger than 400 sq ft theater space I would consider a second or more powerful sub. But at the current $219 (which is hilarious as the sub itself sells for $299) I see the set going for, its kind of hard to go wrong. « Show Less
137501
I really have no experience with the T51i, although I understand that it is was designed fir the iphone and therefore has a remote control built into the right cord for answering calls, etc. The pricing difference is odd because I have seen each costing more or less than the other on different sites on-line. But the main cause of the price difference, making the "p" cost more is that it has been recently upgraded, but the name-T51p remains the same, so one cannot tell the difference between the newer one except by manufacture date. The "i" model for the iphone seems new and if you need a good headphone for use with a smartphone, that is the one to get, although, since it was apparently designed for the iphone, per Beyer's website, its mini plug and remote may only work fully with an iphone. I have the T51p Tesla and bought it on Amazon for $199 last year. At the time it was rated by What-hifi (a trust worthy British audio mag.) as the best in the $299 range. And it is a great headphone. it would seem by the price $425.76, that this model is probably the newest model with upgrade. It might be best to go the Beyer website to find out for sure.
2052067
Personally I have not compared specs against the x4000, but I will say I am dissatisfied with my 4520CI and would recommend against it. Hopefully Denon has upped their quality in their newer models, but the 4520 is buggy, and not of the quality I am used to for Denon. I have been using Denon myself for the past 30 years and every iteration gets a little worse. Ill be looking for a different brand for my next AV receiver unless I see som significant improvement in their reviews.
137498
As most of the other comments have said, the price difference is most likely due to a new T51p version and just variance on different sites. I have the T51p's and what I can say, is if the T51i version is the same as T51p then you can't wrong with either. I've had my pair for about a year now and I'm still blown away by how the good the sound is every time I put them on
1433289
Hello, the A7 uses your WIFI network, and it has a better sound quality. Not sure if the price difference is worth it buy they are both great products, cheers!
257393
The answer Janice Buckley gave is exactly what Actron's website gives for the difference between models.The additional features served me well already and I believe are definetly worth having. Dale Graefnitz
1568808
I bought the DA-E750, and it has worked very well, but I use it connected to my wi-fi network, not via bluetooth. I have noticed two issues: a) I programmed a new Speaker name, but, within a matter of one month, it reverted to the previous generic name, and b) its dock connector uses the old iPhone connector, and Samsung has not refreshed it with a new dock connector. The dock connector is useful to connect it to the wifi network for the first time, or when you change the network password. Bottom line, I suggest you to use this speaker with wifi, it will work very well.