is the fujinon 56mm f/1.2 a 85mm f/1.8 equivalent in Full Frame ??
1370586
Yes, it is. The focal length and aperture value cannot be mathematically separated, and must both be multiplied by 1.53.
1370587
It is 85/1.8 equivalent for depth of field, but 85/1.2 equivalent for aperture/light gathering.
1370588
Exactly. It should be noted that it's sharp and CA-free at 1.2 as well. If Canon or Nikon made a 1.8 this good, I'd be stoked.
1735305
No it is not. Here's some images on these pages that will show what they look like on a FF camera. I got these on Google|Images searching for "rokinon 8mm fisheye full frame": http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?p=13659655 http://www.staff.uni-mainz.de/dellani/fotos/20090828-_DSC0851.jpghttp://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3611895
2037229
I believe the 70d is a crop-sensor, so it would give you the full-frame equivalent of 56mm.
838887
In my experience with the 85Mm f1.8 is that these lenses are not fast compared to others. This is a portrait lens, not a sports lens...
314830
You'll need a bigger filter. The Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4.0 requires a 58mm. This one's a 52mm
377353
I shoot with 1d's which have the 1.3 Sensor, not sure if the Type 2's are for full frame or 1.6. You might try calling the Company directly and ask.I will say this, they work great...
514446
Yes,this is a full frame lens. Hope this helps. Thank you for shopping our store. We appreicate your business. Blue Penn Cameras
305766
The 28 1.8 is sharp starting at f2.2 and better corrected. At 1.8 it is a little soft. Distortion is better than 28-300 and the lens is significantly lighter but just as well made.
1041296
The 35mm f1.4 is amazing. The photos I gets are out of this world. I'm saving now for the 56mm f1.2. Prime lenses are pretty much all I work with.
1789044
The 2.8 works great for indoor pictures and the image quality difference is minimal. I've used both and I dont see any reason to buy the f/4 besides saving money. In April, Canon is updating the 2.8 lens with updated optics and the new IS. Alos the minimum focusing distance is shortened to just under 4 feet. I will be upgrading lenses at that time for sure. After having both lenses, my f/2.8 lens is the one that lives on the camera 95% of the time.
241544
I have the 85 f1.8D and 35 f2D and they are fantastic. The two lenses you mention should be even better. The 35 is such a versatile focal length, I have been using as my all purpose lens.
1329593
This is a good quality lens. Yes you can preserve the original f2.8. As regards image quality I don't have a laboratory to measure such things but there certainly isn't the obvious problem with distortion or focus out near the edges that you see with cheaper lenses. I'm sorry I can't be more specific.
822685
Yes this is a full frame lens. In my opinion it is a lot of lens for the money. It's fast and very sharp.
1260901
Yes it is ... But you will have a crop factor of 1.5 or 1.6 I believe ... Instead of having a 35 mm it will be as viewing through a 52.5 mm lens
1735306
No it is not. Here's some images on these pages that will show what they look like on a FF camera. I got these on Google|Images searching for "rokinon 8mm fisheye full frame": http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?p=13659655 http://www.staff.uni-mainz.de/dellani/fotos/20090828-_DSC0851.jpg http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3611895
998817
Yes sir. Its definitely a full frame lens. I use the d610. And the macro on this lens is great
659560
Hi glenn: how the 105 mm compares with the 85mm f/1.4 lens for portrait shots thank you for your advice