How does it compare with the Yamaha GL1?
1382217
I don't have a Yamaha gl1 but the Cordoba sometimes has a really bad buzz sound when u play it.. Honestly the quality isn't as good as I was expecting.
1382218
I bought both. I did not like the Yamaha GL1 so I gave it away as a gift. The problem I had with the Yamaha was the width of the neck. It seemed very wide. Felt like I was playing a 12 string or a very wide neck Spanish guitar. So if you like a wide neck the Yamaha would be the one, the Cordoba worked better for me as the neck was smaller and seemed easier to play. I hope that helps
229179
According to my experience the amp simulations offered by the G1N are enough to satisfy any taste. Distortion: all the kind and strengt you want, and a good noise gate and compression. It is an entry level Multi Effect but it is complete.
495659
The Platinum model 1 has a piano black housing and a brighter face than the model 1. There is no difference in sound quality as far as I could tell. The platinum 1, in my opinion, is much better looking.
1876628
Hi! Dd you buy the case for your Yamaha GL1? Can you tell me wether the Yamaha GL1 guitalele fits that Oscar Schmidt case? I see different measurements of the Guitalele GL1... Thanks, Stef
2049675
Both have: matte finish black keys, adjustable touch response, 3 piano style pedals, attached pedal frame, dual headphone jacks, dual voice, reverb/chorus, user song record, sliding key cover, 3 years parts and labor warranty if you purchase from a Yamaha dealer. The V240 has the rhythms many people like which are not on the 162b. Best, Andy's Music
383254
I own both the Ovation and the Yamaha. In my opinion the Ovation has better action and richer sound. The ovation also has a very easy adjustment to lower the action. The down side is that the hard case for the ovation is more expense. How that helps.I own 2 Yamaha's 6 & 12 also 2 6 string Ovation.s
1128705
Hello Paulo, Very little difference. Unless either of the following are important features to you, I would strongly consider saving the $150. Directly from the Yamaha website: RX-V673 vs RX-V675 Last Update: 05/16/2013 The RX-V675 has the following differences/advantages over the RX-V673: 1. MHL supports full HD video and audio from mobile phones and portable devices 2. FLAC or WAV 192kHz/24-bit audio playback Dimensons and Power are the same: (WxHxD) 17 1/8" x 6 3/4" x 14 3/8" 105w x 7 Rated Output Power (8 ohms, 20 Hz-20 kHz, 0.09 % THD, 2 ch driven) 90w x 2 Rated Output Power (8 ohms, 1 kHz, 0.9 % THD, 2 ch driven)
1524118
The keys are feel like plastic and are slippery. They are quite noisy when played by an accomplished pianist. The keys are not sloppy like the Casio. The DGX650 is fun to play and sounds great. The Yamaha P255 has the nice Ivory touch, precision, quiet keyboard most pianists would prefer.
1296700
I have not played with the Baby Taylor much, so please take my answer with a grain of salt.From testing out a couple of models, the Baby Taylor seems to be (generally) brighter in tone than the Martin LX1. The bass resonates more deeply with the Martin and I find that it gives a "fuller" sound. In terms size, they are very similar though if I remember correctly, the Martin LX1 did have a lot more weight to it than the Baby Taylor (I think it was the ply neck). Personally, I like the weight to my LX1, but that may be personal preference. Hope some of this helps. I have not played with the Baby Taylor much, so please take my answer with a grain of salt.From testing out a couple of models, the Baby Taylor seems to be (generally) brighter in tone than the Martin LX1. The bass resonates more deeply with the Martin and I find that it gives a "fuller" sound. In terms size, they are very similar though if I remember correctly, the Martin LX1 did have a lot more weight to it than the Baby Taylor (I think it was the ply neck). Personally, I like the weight to my LX1, but that may be personal preference. Hope... » Read More I have not played with the Baby Taylor much, so please take my answer with a grain of salt.From testing out a couple of models, the Baby Taylor seems to be (generally) brighter in tone than the Martin LX1. The bass resonates more deeply with the Martin and I find that it gives a "fuller" sound. In terms size, they are very similar though if I remember correctly, the Martin LX1 did have a lot more weight to it than the Baby Taylor (I think it was the ply neck). Personally, I like the weight to my LX1, but that may be personal preference. Hope some of this helps. « Show Less
400378
Do you have a G1XN? As far as I know it's not compatible with any of the G1 models, but it is with the G3. I'm not a huge fan of it myself, but that's because I like wah/exp pedals with a bit of give out of the gate.
1547838
This is hard to answer, so I will answer it in this manner. When I first began to play the Yamaha I felt the upright at my church and the Yamaha compared favorably. I could transition between the two more easily than the electronic piano at church. Are they exactly the same? No, but close. You must realize that my perception may be different from yours. Some electronic pianos have the ability to change the sensitivity of the key board. You must realize that this is an entry level instrument and I purchased it to play for my own amusement. It good quality for that purpose. You must decide what quality you want and the purpose of the instrument.
240281
If you value the sound quality over the functionality the answer is yes, but the differences are subtle sound refinements. The V1.2 has sound subtleties or refinements that puts the Dragonfly on par with the competition like HRT Microstreamer, witch is said to posses the smoother sound and also the most detailed, but that it is also slower and a bit less exiting. The V1.0 has a sound that has been qualified as a bit harsh. It has "attack", its fast and this is good for rock or jazz but produces more fatigue on longer sessions. The V1.2 is smoother and this can be heard with the ATM50.
1644593
The S1 delivers a more full bodied sound, whereas the punchy sound of the M2 make it better for genres like rock and metal. If you listen to a wide genre of music then the S1 may be better.
1035960
I just got the Yamaha one that goes with this. The only hassle is that you have to configure it with a browser and a ethernet connection on a computer. It works great!
1453095
I bought the Lyr and Bifrost by SchiitJust sent the Bifrost in for an overhaul - new boards (UBER) and getting new tubes for the LyrFor under $1k I don't think you can do better - Just got the wife a Valhalla for her HD650s - even SHE likes it <g>
826053
That decision I cannot make or suggest one over the other. I would, however, suggest checking the "stats" between the two brands and then go with what you feel "comfortable" with, based on the "specs" and what your needs would be. Yamaha does put, I feel, more effort into their products to give you a satisfied performance and DO tend to be more "pricy" than other brands because of their use of techknowledgy to make a better product. Sorry I can't elaborate more and hope that you find this useful.
1347664
Well when I was looking for a receiver I asked the same question to a tech who said to consider Yamaha as an authority in sound reproduction as they are known for best choice for musicians from keyboards to speakers they are the best and so it shows the same high quality in their receivers. I purchased a 7.1 reciver and I am very happy with the sound quality. Hope this helps