Is this accurate? Better than salifert?
1365410
I used Salifert for years, Red Sea is a well made kit with attention to the details, they are both accurate but I like the Red Sea much better, been reefing 8 years
1365411
About the same quality and ease of use . I would shop by price between the two. Both are good kits but make sure the kits are not going to expire soon before you open them.
128976
I've used both and recommend the Niterider. The light output and features are roughly equivalent but the seals on the Solas are much better. The bottom seal failed on my first Cygolight. They replaced it under warranty and the service was excellent. A similar failure happened on my second Cygolight, allowing road salt into the device and corroding it. After that I bought the Niterider. The Niterider seals have a much better design and I've had no problems with them.
1553055
I will tell you soon. I just tested the bird-x type standard netting with only a 14x14 length I got from Home Depot. It turned out to take the ball hits very well but breaks at the tie points. Using this netting should do well at the tie points and simple math says 9 inch ball circumference/pi 9/3.14159= 2.8647 is larger than the 2x2 netting even with a 2.829 hypotenuse. Either way, work or not, I'm buying this and some 1" electrical conduit (1/2" is far too flimzy) to use as the cheap caging material with 1 1/2 pipes partly buried to anchor the ends. When it's done I'll post the results and the costs... I will tell you soon. I just tested the bird-x type standard netting with only a 14x14 length I got from Home Depot. It turned out to take the ball hits very well but breaks at the tie points. Using this netting should do well at the tie points and simple math says 9 inch ball circumference/pi 9/3.14159= 2.8647 is larger than the 2x2 netting even with a 2.829 hypotenuse. Either way, work or not, I'm buying this and some 1" electrical conduit (1/2" is far too flimzy) to use as the cheap caging material with 1 1/2 pipes partly buried to anchor the ends. When it's done I'll post the... » Read More I will tell you soon. I just tested the bird-x type standard netting with only a 14x14 length I got from Home Depot. It turned out to take the ball hits very well but breaks at the tie points. Using this netting should do well at the tie points and simple math says 9 inch ball circumference/pi 9/3.14159= 2.8647 is larger than the 2x2 netting even with a 2.829 hypotenuse. Either way, work or not, I'm buying this and some 1" electrical conduit (1/2" is far too flimzy) to use as the cheap caging material with 1 1/2 pipes partly buried to anchor the ends. When it's done I'll post the results and the costs... « Show Less
1340465
Favorably. They both do the job. I have three different versions: 1) Peet, 2) Cabela's (Peet), and 3) MaxxDry. Cosmetic differences and cord length other than that functionally similar and interchangeable tubes.
2071467
The new magnet-free sensor works quite well in my experience. While I used to occasionally get erratic readings with the old magnet-based sensor, that hasn't happened with the new one that I've seen. So I'd say it's just as accurate as the magnet-based sensor if not more so.
124354
I did not use solution to get started, but used it later and it was in range. I found the True2Go to be 30 points off NovaMax Plus, which I also tested with its appropriate control solution. After comparing to Lab results, True2Go was correct, and NovaMax was wrong, despite reputation for being accurate. Apparently there is little to regulate accuracy. Nevertheless, I still prefer True2Go.
962807
It is better than the swanson. I had ordered both and I need to reorder today. This product is morepotent per capsule. Hope this helps...
1731456
I believe so, Lonnie, but, as I had mentioned in the review, it's *extremely* inaccurate (+/- 18 minutes a year and Honeywell thinks it's acceptable). Given the choice, I'd buy anything else on the market. I'm stuck with this and not happy about it and Honeywell's customer service left much to be desired. Good luck!
1686641
The O gauge has more detail than the G gauge, so yes. I would say it is better.
123046
Accuracy is claimed to be a lot tighter than that. I bought three and the three are very consistent when each is used on the same tire. I don't know about NIST, nor have I checked them against any other standard. I bought them because my 2013 Ford Focus manual recommends digital or dial gauges rather than stick gauges for accuracy.
65991
No send it back it is not accurate took mine to Dr . App. Big difference in reading.
2106530
I don't know why the reviews are better. The wrist monitor is much easier to use. I compared mine to the docs readings and they were very close for all readings. I would take several readings along with your doc and compare the readings. You should then know how to correct your readings to what he gets. You should sit with your heart over your feet when using the wrist monitor if you are sitting back the readings won't be accurate.
1567163
I had the same question. Given the answer, it appears the s version is better(?)
1254120
Yes, it is accurate. Looks like a 6-quart butit is a 1-1/2 quart. It's a mini me!
1694070
Agree with the comment about doing things just right. Mine is very accurate. I will say I messed around with it a bit in the beginning to see what would make it go astray. Generally speaking though it is very accurate. I have had no problems.
1529585
I am not buying the hype of expensive test kits. I have always used the cheaper kits and have never had any issues. There are instances where you need to be as close as possible to an exact reading but I've found close enough is good enough. Go cheaper in this case.
330071
I am an RN and I bought this for my aging parents. From what I can determine, I tested it before I gave it to them it was accurate. I bought one for myself, another brand and it read the same so that is what I can tell you.