I am a 32 waist in jeans. I bought a 32 pair of these and the button fell short about 5 inches. Defect, or is the sizing different?
60986
Sounds like a major defect to be 5 inches short. The pair of pants that I recently received fit perfectly both in the waist and length. The only issue I have with the pants is the extra "relaxed" fit around the legs. I know the pants was designed to be relaxed for tactical purposes but this was a little wider than I expected. Hope this helps.
60987
Probably defect... My husband wears a 32 waist in jeans, and he's had two pairs of these pants in a 32 waist that both fit the same... Just a bit roomier than a 32 jean. (He tried to go down to a 30, but that was much too snug.)
60988
Either it was a defect, or marked wrong, or - pardon me for being forward - you're no longer a size 32? If you haven't grown...out...ask 5.11 for a trade.
60989
well the 40 waist was right, have you measured the 32? i guess its the luck of the draw with what you get.
1087059
Hey Jeff, I am about a 30 waist in most jeans and the mediums fit me nicely. I can just get away with not needing a belt. What sold me on these was the leg room at the knees. They aren't baggy, but do really like room to move around in and not feel constricted. Hope this helps!
925587
I can not confirm that. I know mine are a little short. But, I have not experienced a problem.
1928665
I wouldnt know as the button hasnt feel off yet but i would assume there would be a tiny hole if piercing completely fresh fabric.. i just used the same hole that my previous Jean button fell out from
83949
I'm a male with a 32 waist and I got a medium. When i put it on it felt a little loose but after tightening the draw string it was perfect without any loss of comfort.
633314
My waist is between 32 and 33. M fits but is a bit loose so I need to tighten up the belt. Surprisingly, S fits me too and also need to tighten the belt a little. So I don't know. Also, I notice the leg on the M is a bit baggy than the S. So I chose the S.
1322237
This is the size chart link.. I found they are to true to size and 1.5" below bellybutton.. I have been searching for duty pants and I found ones that fit.. Hope this helps..http://images1.opticsplanet.com/pdf/opplanet-tru-spec-sizing-chart.pdf
34147
Excuse me, my name is Pablo from ecuador! My english ia very bad very, but i am 34waist with lenght 32! And it is perfect for me.Even i wear my jean, and it is fit! I think you must use yhe size S, of course the size S! I hope help you!!!
29542
I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the... » Read More I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. « Show Less
1797367
I bought a pair a medium for my 42 inch waist hubby and they fit snugly but not too snugly. so I would guess a medium for you? hope this helps.
1256288
Hello -- we've had some petite adults say they were ok for them, but as we know everyone is a different size. I'll address this more fully in your email to us, but one quick fix might be to stretch them about a bit (the metal band is flexible). We have a 100% Satisfaction Guarantee so we'll work something out with you of course. Thank you.
1981862
I own about 6 pairs of these. I am 5'9", and about 158-160 with a 31-32 inch waist. The Medium regular fits great. Almost all of my pants/Jeans are 32x32. If you gain a bit of weight, the expanding waist will give you an extra inch or two as well.
835835
They are a bit snug on the waist. I would go a size up. I am a 32 and went with medium. Should have gone with a large but the medium is wearable.
255403
In my opinion, these run small. So keep that in mind when ordering. My daughter wears an 8 in jeans, but these were very tight in an 8. My daughter is muscular so that may have been the cause as well.
1952675
Sounds like you got funkled as I did recently by a Marketplace vendor. She told me I could get a refund through Amazon. Would send you a photo of mine, but it's a .7 and the buttons are different from yours. Sorry!
42703
I have two pair of these pants for several months and both have shrunk significantly. I am 5'4'' and the size 2 pants hit about the middle of my calf. The size 3 pants are now several inches shorter than I'd like. Admittedly I used the dryer on the size 2 pants (with regular heat), but on the size 3 pants I only used the delicate (cool) setting and they still shrunk a lot.
2172335
I have 3 pairs that I turned into shorts (2 bought early 2013, 1 bought Dec 2013). Neither of the first 2 shrank the year a wore them as pants. The 3rd were turned into shorts just after purchase. I can't comment on the length, but the waist (36) has not gotten tighter. Then again, and this is doubtful, I could have lost an inch along my waist.As a side note, I really wish Amazon carried these. It really looks like they are burning through their left over inventory, and not restocking.