what is the difference between thunder series and a regular 650?
1387157
To get the technical difference, go to the Edelbrock site, and it gives a good description. Thunder series are similar to the Carter AVS type carbs, which is Air Valve Secondaries, and Performer series carbs are similar to the Carter AFB carbs, which were Aluminum Four Barrel. Differences are in the way the secondaries operate, and body design.are similar to the Carter AFB carbs
1387158
It works better on inclines. I had regular on 1971 bronco and it work "cough" on inclines....got Thunder, it doesn't anymore.....keeps fuel going into carb with out an issue.
1387159
The thunder series have "avs" adjustable vacuum secondaries. Just gives you a little bit of a better tune.
825238
The 650 series does not have DLNA. Sorry. That feature is included in the 750 model and up.
1946300
Yes. The thunder ballast is interchangeable with 120 and 240 outlets. I am satisfied with my purchase so far. For the price point these ballasts are just about as good as it gets.
672650
Given the price difference and comparable features and specs, save the money and get the 69F. However, if I were you, I'd get the new 650 series since they have higher contrast ratio, faster response time and 120hz refresh rate. Compare for yourself.
1330364
The 6400 is listed as a "previous model", so it looks like it's one generation behind the 6500. The 6400 has 160-watts less power for max output, and 60-watts less power continuous for subs in bridged mode. If you plan to use for subs on Channel-B and mid/high on Channel-A, then the 6500 is the best choice. The 6500 also has a variable low-pass filter to allow you to tune your sub frequency cross-over. Both are type A/B, so either is a good fit for mixing subs and mid/high use on same amp. (Although A/B amps do get much hotter than D-types. D-types are only good for subs as they don't need as much accuracy in producing the sound.) The 6400 is listed as a "previous model", so it looks like it's one generation behind the 6500. The 6400 has 160-watts less power for max output, and 60-watts less power continuous for subs in bridged mode. If you plan to use for subs on Channel-B and mid/high on Channel-A, then the 6500 is the best choice. The 6500 also has a variable low-pass filter to allow you to tune your sub frequency cross-over. Both are type A/B, so either is a good fit for mixing subs and mid/high use on same amp. (Although A/B amps do get much hotter than D-types. D-types are only good for subs as they... » Read More The 6400 is listed as a "previous model", so it looks like it's one generation behind the 6500. The 6400 has 160-watts less power for max output, and 60-watts less power continuous for subs in bridged mode. If you plan to use for subs on Channel-B and mid/high on Channel-A, then the 6500 is the best choice. The 6500 also has a variable low-pass filter to allow you to tune your sub frequency cross-over. Both are type A/B, so either is a good fit for mixing subs and mid/high use on same amp. (Although A/B amps do get much hotter than D-types. D-types are only good for subs as they don't need as much accuracy in producing the sound.) « Show Less
528074
Length. If you are under 5 8 and wont ever need it to be linger get the 650
1516181
So is this problem specific to the 750 model, or has anyone had the same issue with the 650? The price difference now is less than $100, but I would prefer the 650 simply to stay away from the frame and halo issues.
785275
No the 650s frame is different. The Halo is not a problem, some even think it's a bonus (I Like it actually). You can remedy the halo with bias lighting that gets rid of it and improves your blacks. Don't let the talk of a Halo help to make a bad decision. The 650 is the same as the 750 except for the fact the 750 can do HD PIP and the 650 can't. The 750 plays video through it's usb drive or streamed using a bridge and a dlna client.Good luck
396
I have a 6500 - no "A" - and this is the kind that I use.....they work fine. Hope this helps. Cathy
2265402
The FR 700 and FR 650 look alike but have different features. I ordered the 700 but received the 650 which is a less expensive unit with less features. No explanation yet from Amazon why this happened. Regardless, it's not good advertising for Amazon.
2032416
Main differences between the NT135T and the NT120R are as follows; the NT135T has slightly more power than the NT120R, but the NT120R is ruggedized which means it is shock proof, water proof and dust proof. I chose the NT120R because of the amount of power you get out of it and that it is more versatile. You can take it anywhere without worrying about damaging it, work, home or play. You will be happy with either, but consider your possible uses and locations.
331639
There's a different chassis & the newer intel processors are basically the main differences. The new alw14 also came with some additional GPU options, 660m instead of the 650m
748000
Difference appears to be more design than anything. The TSX series is current--the Monitor 65's are discontinued. Eric C
516283
It would work fine although you would be better off getting yourself the 650W to save a few bucks.
354925
I had the same concerns as you regrading Hz. There is a CONSIDERABLE difference that you can notice between 60Hz and 120HZ when watching fast paced movies (fast n furious) or sports. However, there is less of a difference when you move from 120Hz to 240Hz. I've read that the 650B series/model is the same as the 850A series, except the 850A is just somewhat slimmer/thinner. I opt'ed for the 750B because I got a great price from SEARS ($1999.00) and I compared it to Sony's XBR9 series and I liked the Sammy better. Also, I was reading the blogs and although the 850A is a great TV, the majority of comments stated the 750 is the way to go. So you are aware, BB was selling the 850A for $1899.00 on their web-site. I had the same concerns as you regrading Hz. There is a CONSIDERABLE difference that you can notice between 60Hz and 120HZ when watching fast paced movies (fast n furious) or sports. However, there is less of a difference when you move from 120Hz to 240Hz. I've read that the 650B series/model is the same as the 850A series, except the 850A is just somewhat slimmer/thinner. I opt'ed for the 750B because I got a great price from SEARS ($1999.00) and I compared it to Sony's XBR9 series and I liked the Sammy better. Also, I was reading the blogs and although the 850A is a great TV,... » Read More I had the same concerns as you regrading Hz. There is a CONSIDERABLE difference that you can notice between 60Hz and 120HZ when watching fast paced movies (fast n furious) or sports. However, there is less of a difference when you move from 120Hz to 240Hz. I've read that the 650B series/model is the same as the 850A series, except the 850A is just somewhat slimmer/thinner. I opt'ed for the 750B because I got a great price from SEARS ($1999.00) and I compared it to Sony's XBR9 series and I liked the Sammy better. Also, I was reading the blogs and although the 850A is a great TV, the majority of comments stated the 750 is the way to go. So you are aware, BB was selling the 850A for $1899.00 on their web-site. « Show Less
1112152
I have the 650W and it works just like the expensive one that Garmin probably buys here, I am sure it will work on the 650!
898836
hey guys the 32 650 is 15,000:1 and 5ms if you want the 50,000:1 and 4ms and the 120hz one of the same tv you have to buy the bigger size one of the same model