how bulky is it actually? I'd be pleased if someone can give me an input on actually how bulky this camera can be, for example in the info it appears it is 1 inch thick, which for me it's kind of a minus vs say exilim casio cameras.
309769
the size of the camera is the size of my samsung blade phone, or if you have a bose wave radio, it is actually smaller than the remote and thickness just a 1/4" thicker than the phone, ( the phone is like the motorola razr)
957979
Thank you for your comment. I found it very helpful. I naturally prefer Canon but really want the wide-angle offered in this Sony camcorder. Canon missed the boat on wide angle in my view.
2073837
Agree with Bob ring's comment. The only thing I am disappointed with is battery life is a little short sometimes. I have got some great shallow water pictures with it. Stills as well as videos. It is a lot of camera for the money. Do not try to change the battery with wet hands. Mine stopped working for a short time until I dried it out. I do really like it. I do recommend buying a couple extra batteries. I have taken around 6000 pictures with mine.
1447680
It is a 2004 SLR with just 8.2MP and it is heavy. That said, it is a great second camera. My primary camera is a 5D III. I purchased the 1D to keep out of my camera bag and in a place where I could just grab it for spur of the moment family events. It is rugged enough so that if one of my grandkids knocks it over there is no harm done. And since I am not planning on printing posters the 8.2MPs is not a drawback. In summary, if you are looking for a rugged second camera - the 1D Mark II is a good choice.
560626
Thanks Kin.Actually, I'm looking for something smaller than a reflex on which I could occasionnaly use my nikon lenses.After using a bit an oly e-p2, i'm a bit confused ; it's better than I thought, and has the IS build in.Does anyone know if nikon will release a micro 4/3 camera soon ?
69177
Great response, Dave Diode...I have a question about this. Can it be attached only to DSLR cameras or also mirror less cameras? Thanks! (I'm searching for a dSLR quality camera but found out that none can be used at classical concerts because of the loud shutter noise).
887350
It is kind of big, it defianlty wont fit in your pocket but its still a pretty reasonable size. You can take pics with it but the case kind of covers the camera a little bit.
2189969
I have not actually not used this camera for a long time. I couldn't really tell you. I still have it & liked it just have not had reason to use it for some time now. I would actually need to play with it a bit now just to get used to it again myself. Sorry can't really help.
105267
I'm also trying to decide between the SD850 and SD750...I prefer the S850 features, but this camera is so much thicker (1.04" vs 0.77"), and I was looking for a thin camera. The dimensions are on Canon's website...have you physically seen the two cameras and can you confirm the difference in thickness? I was curious that you did not mention...perhaps it's not as different as I think?
948241
Well, it's just the size of the sensor troubles me. What kind of picture is this going to take at even a 400 ISO? Nevermind 800 or higher.I just wonder if it's worth getting a camera this big when the sx200IS can be had for almost half the price, it's way easier to carry, and when you add the chdk firmware, will be almost as functional.I suppose if this were to be your only camera, but personally, I'd like to see what they do with the Rebel, either later this year or next. Or if I have a "rich uncle die", buy the 5D Mark II ;-)
122905
I just bought a 40D and I think it is a great camera. As posted, there is not best choice but I am sure if the extra (few) bucks is not an issue, we should go for the 40D. It is also the latest sensor and I found it to be really good. Took some shots and it is great.
1947991
Im not a perfessional photographer .but I think its a bit smaller for this size.because of it wld keep 70-300lens,17-40lens and body only. other room just for battery and other small things. so I suggest you wld buy biger one at least it keep 3lens and body.thisis my opinion only .thank you.
202376
my camera only weighs 19.8 oz and isn't really considered a dslr .........thanx so much for your input though :)
596187
First, I'm in the market to buy this camera, I don't own one. I'm not trying to complain about the posts so far, but I'm wondering if you are simply using the auto mode when indoors, or have you tried other modes (Indoor Mode), ISO speeds, etc that the camera comes equipped with? If the images are "VERY POOR", what exactly have you tested? (Others report indoor images have been good).
1862332
(Reply to Rachel's post):This was my question exactly.. I like it's features but am reluctant to buy it because it says it's only for specific cameras. What makes it compatible with those but not other brands/models? (specifically please, from someone who knows for sure) There has to be a reason why it's listed as only for those cameras, and I'd like to know what it is..
451743
Get the Nikon, I just got this Casio not too long ago, and the only thing I use it for, after many testings, is the slow motion video feature. In terms of shooting HD video clips, the Nikon does this good, the Casio seems a bit noisy in low light situation. However, when shooting stills, sure the Casio offers 40fps so you don't miss the best shot when an action takes place, but then it must be well lit, under sun light. Then you get a pretty good chance to have the best shot recorded. However, in terms of picture quality, it is very clear and obvious that the Nikon wins, big time! I set the Casio to shoot outdoor, under well lit lighting condition, at ISO 100, with the quality setting set to FINE in JPG at 9.1 megapixel, everything is set to the max, the stills would still come out not as sharp, not as detailed, and still unbelievably noisy, it is SO much noisier than the Nikon, in fact, it is the noisiest camera that I'd used so far. The Casio also suffers very poor purple fringing, and it is so bad that even a cheap point-shoot Canon can beat it. I just cannot use the Casio for pictures, period. But to use it for shooting slow-motion video and occasional HD clips, its the perfect camera for it. If you are into shooting more still photos, get the Nikon. If you don't care about shooting stills much but just want to check out the slow-motion video features that the Casio offers, then you may find yourself falling in love with it.
1094064
Faye, This is an amazing camera, but small and used recreationally by my husband. I can't honestly answer your question but would suggest finding it locally and checking it out in person first. Denise