ANSI rating for Radians Revelation Protective Shooting Glasses: Does anyone know if the ANSI rating is actually on the glasses themselves?
245430
I found this added to the description on web sites of several other sellers: All of Radians glasses are produced in ISO Certified facilities. They meet or exceed ANSI Z87.1 + standards and many styles have also been evaluated to Canadian safety standards
1709902
Hello, HG, I have to admit I have twice now used the blacklight flashlight at night just to look for pet urine and I haven't been wearing protective UV glasses. I just had a long discussion about this with my spouse who was a scientist and who told me that for my small use of that flashlight there is very little likelihood of my having any damage to my eyes; however, "little likelihood" is not a comforting thought to me and so I think I will acquire a pair of those glasses. I don't like to take chances with my eyes. Thank you for mentioning this possible problem.
888741
Belinda, I use these in a manufacturing environment and have had no issues with blurring. The main part of the safety glasses are just ANSI spec safety plastic. The only lens part is the bifocal. If you are seeing blurry you may need prescription safety glasses?
2276395
The website says they have UV400 protection. (Global Vision Eyewear, Escort AST)
238512
*Meets the ANSI Z87.1 High Velocity Impact Standards.*Meets MCEP GL-PD 10-12 Ballistic Standards*CAN/CSA Z94.3-07*CE EN166 Certified*AS/NZS 1337http://pyramexsafety.com/products/eyewear/GB1830ST
238511
*Meets the ANSI Z87.1 High Velocity Impact Standards. *Meets MCEP GL-PD 10-12 Ballistic Standards *CAN/CSA Z94.3-07 *CE EN166 Certified *AS/NZS 1337 http://pyramexsafety.com/products/eyewear/GB1830ST
557873
Not sure whether this applies to this pair or not, but one of their other models (the GR004-C1) says this in the product description: "For those who wear drugstore readers and intend to use our glasses for computer use, we recommend you order 50% the power of your reading glasses. So if you're reading power is that of +2.00, order your Gamma Ray Readers in +1.00. If your reading power is +2.25, round down and order your Gamma Ray Readers in +1.00."
2052917
I don't know for sure, they are DLP screen sync shutter glasses. For some reason I seem to remember NVIDIA3d being RF synced?? Not light synced. But that is only from memory...sorry
2074784
i dont know what ANSI rated is but i used them to load cement trucks and the cement ruined the lens .
40139
That's the method we used when buying my daughter's goggles. She ended up with -3.625 (R) and -4.25 (L) so we split the difference with a -4 prescription. She says they work well enough for her, and she has to be read a white board to get her workout during swim practice.
1216944
No. Do not play airsoft with these! Even if another person was able to stop some rounds it is not rated to withstand anything so it should be assumed entirely unsafe. In the absence of ratings lenses don't have to have strong quality control so one lens may be significantly stronger than the other due to the materials used or a manufacturing defect. Goggles like these buy their lenses in bulk from countries like China so you don't know how they were made. Your eyes are far too valuable to risk on subpar protection, especially for a price difference of ~$10. At minimum play with ANSI z87.1 but ideally MIL STD 662F. No. Do not play airsoft with these! Even if another person was able to stop some rounds it is not rated to withstand anything so it should be assumed entirely unsafe. In the absence of ratings lenses don't have to have strong quality control so one lens may be significantly stronger than the other due to the materials used or a manufacturing defect. Goggles like these buy their lenses in bulk from countries like China so you don't know how they were made. Your eyes are far too valuable to risk on subpar protection, especially for a price difference of ~$10. At minimum play with... » Read More No. Do not play airsoft with these! Even if another person was able to stop some rounds it is not rated to withstand anything so it should be assumed entirely unsafe. In the absence of ratings lenses don't have to have strong quality control so one lens may be significantly stronger than the other due to the materials used or a manufacturing defect. Goggles like these buy their lenses in bulk from countries like China so you don't know how they were made. Your eyes are far too valuable to risk on subpar protection, especially for a price difference of ~$10. At minimum play with ANSI z87.1 but ideally MIL STD 662F. « Show Less
852688
I were them here in Louisiana today in fact and it was a sunny day. I believe they do offer protection. There is no UV rating other than a comment somewhere about being standard polarized lenses.
1945228
They have an IR-3 or IR-5 rating and an ANSI Z87.1 that requires listing the UV protection level but I couldn't find it anywhere on the goggles or any sites offering them. I use them for glass and metal working but you might hold off using them for UV until you know for sure. Most IR rated optics do block UV but I'm not sure if that's intrinsic. It's the opposite end of the spectrum that these are explicitly designed to protect your eyes from.
1582124
Not a clue. Sorry. I just know they keep my eyes in good shape when wearin prescription glasses.
672299
"Front End" Addendum: GUNNAR Optiks is aware that the plastic used for the frames of the original Intercept glasses breaks easily, so they have switched to a (hopefully) more resilient plastic. GUNNAR customer service bent over backwards to make things right. Thanks, GUNNAR!________________I would hesitate before getting prescription lenses, at least for the Intercept model. The frames are brittle and fragile. Even though I was careful with them, I've gone through two pairs that broke at the exact same place. The poor quality frames are NOT worth the hefty price tag. "Front End" Addendum: GUNNAR Optiks is aware that the plastic used for the frames of the original Intercept glasses breaks easily, so they have switched to a (hopefully) more resilient plastic. GUNNAR customer service bent over backwards to make things right. Thanks, GUNNAR!________________I would hesitate before getting prescription lenses, at least for the Intercept model. The frames are brittle and fragile. Even though I was careful with them, I've gone through two pairs that broke at the exact same place. The poor quality frames are NOT worth the hefty... » Read More "Front End" Addendum: GUNNAR Optiks is aware that the plastic used for the frames of the original Intercept glasses breaks easily, so they have switched to a (hopefully) more resilient plastic. GUNNAR customer service bent over backwards to make things right. Thanks, GUNNAR!________________I would hesitate before getting prescription lenses, at least for the Intercept model. The frames are brittle and fragile. Even though I was careful with them, I've gone through two pairs that broke at the exact same place. The poor quality frames are NOT worth the hefty price tag. « Show Less
1489963
I have never had my Remington Radians glasses fog on me. When wearing a mask in dusty conditions, and cold temperatures, I always make sure there is a tight seal at the top of the masks to seal off any warm air expelled from my nose, and mouth. When driving through fog the red tinted lenses seem to help penetrate through the fog more than driving without wearing them.
1124875
Have to agree with Mr.J's comments here.As for Student62 - defective I believe is not the word here, because as you mentioned - "still works"..,,more like small bits on the outer edge of one or both lens will show signs of "melting"if that is the correct word when you look *real close, besides that while wearing the 3D glassit is absolutely unnoticeable when you are watching any 3D film.