other then the nipples, is there any diff. in the fuel capacity [ what is in the unit] between fotz9k044a and the e6tz9k044a,I run a 89/250 w/351
1327216
well, the more expensive unit has a filter in it, where the fotz9k044a does not have any in it, but i just bought a cheap napa filter and mounted it between the tank and the fotz9k044a and btw im using this smaller unit on a 460 (or 7.5 liter) big block V8 eng, contrary to professional advice, and it works fine for me. plenty of power and no hesitation, even towing a heavy trailer and under heavy acceleration, no problems.
774589
You can definitely feel the shifts are quicker and firmer. The biggest difference by far is the extra 100 HP and torque. It absolutely is the best mod I did for my 02 F350. Gas mileage went up about 5% too. Not much but when it turns your truck from docile behemoth to a sports truck AND gives better mileage it is a win win.
2124824
Those are the dimensions of the nipples on the pump itself. .hope that helps...
1353865
I dont know but I know that the upper gear roll off is much more crisp. No issue- possibly a subtle change. I do know my gas useag hasnt changed significantly
1695092
Lowes. I went from 1" to 3/4" brass barb - 3/4" fuel line hose to 3'4" to 1/2" barb - 1/2" fuel hose to 1/2" tp 3/8" brass barb. Installed two of these together with a 1" x 3" brass pipe and mounted them under my Ford F350 6.4L diesel to filter the fuel moving from my 50 gallon auxiliary tank mounted in the bed of the truck to the main factory tank. Now I only add fuel to the aux tank so it is very clean by the time it goes through two of these filters and into my main tank. I did all of those step downs so I would be using fuel hose. Be careful, you do not want to use radiator or coolant hose. I will disolve and end up in your injectors. Lowes. I went from 1" to 3/4" brass barb - 3/4" fuel line hose to 3'4" to 1/2" barb - 1/2" fuel hose to 1/2" tp 3/8" brass barb. Installed two of these together with a 1" x 3" brass pipe and mounted them under my Ford F350 6.4L diesel to filter the fuel moving from my 50 gallon auxiliary tank mounted in the bed of the truck to the main factory tank. Now I only add fuel to the aux tank so it is very clean by the time it goes through two of these filters and into my main tank. I did all of those step downs so I would be using fuel hose. Be... » Read More Lowes. I went from 1" to 3/4" brass barb - 3/4" fuel line hose to 3'4" to 1/2" barb - 1/2" fuel hose to 1/2" tp 3/8" brass barb. Installed two of these together with a 1" x 3" brass pipe and mounted them under my Ford F350 6.4L diesel to filter the fuel moving from my 50 gallon auxiliary tank mounted in the bed of the truck to the main factory tank. Now I only add fuel to the aux tank so it is very clean by the time it goes through two of these filters and into my main tank. I did all of those step downs so I would be using fuel hose. Be careful, you do not want to use radiator or coolant hose. I will disolve and end up in your injectors. « Show Less
271295
I believe the 396 carb hole pattern is different . 396 was built with a quadrant carb
1396233
I have this on my Fz8 2011- its an awesome pipe- i actually thought i gained some power - and losimg about 20lbs from the stock exhaust.Rob
1380337
Sorry I can't comment, I but unless you have done a lot of modification to the 302 it will not pull enough air wasting fuel and performance. Not much help but Glen
714621
Yeah from what I been told you cant get more than about 70 addittional hp for stock injectors. I can't tell any difference between 100 and 140 hp because I have stock injectors. Replacing the flat turbo down tube with a 3" round down pipe would be wise.
1439231
I don't know, they barely fit in my 4.6, the fuel rail was low in on some cylinders.And the mounting bolt guide and coil angle were off compared to stock coils.
2110054
None, after running it for a while, what fealt like a gain was not, dyno showed same results a a drop in performance filter. Also mileage dropped, to 25 mpg from 29 mpg. I recently returned car back to stock, power is the same, fuel economy back up. Only positive thing about this unit is price, and sound. I had the Mopar unit, prior to this, and a K&N; as well, money wise, lesson learned just buy a K&N; replacement filter and save some time and money. On a side note if you are looking for bling and nice tone from engine, then the unit is worth it.
1848457
you need to research that on your own. look at your owners manualPS from what i found out there is only like two different types of fuel tanks for these small units. And they don't look the same, one is longer and narrow(this one) and the another is fat/wide and shorter and they don't interchange. So if the pic looks like yours then it should fit. Hope this helpstook me two minutes to find out! what you need is this: D19 791-181082 Tank, Fuel
497812
I could not find this answer and I have both sizes. One does seem to have a faster flow than the other but the nipples are not labled, that I am aware of. I have mixed them up from using both so I don't know if it is coincidence or not. Please post an answer if you find out the flow of the nipples.
1202101
I do not know . The only experiance I have had is on a 2009 75 H.P. 4-stroke merc which has the same lower unit as the 90 & 115 merc .
1394105
My F250 takes a 912 bulb. Check to see if yourd is the same. Sylvania has a good guide on there website.
714618
Cold air intake and bigger exhaust ! If you put stage 2 injectors you should upgrade head studs to ARP studs (probably a good idea to change studs regardless)
1222258
No, the ones I purchased are marked AG13/357A which are supposed to be the same as LR44 do not have a nipple on the back. I have not tried them yet as they were for a Xmas item and it was after Xmas when I received them.