What does the Calcium Lactate "SP" stand for in front of the 1900, vs. just 1900
1332745
Sorry don't understand the question. I use the SP brank Calcium Lactate 1900. It's highly recommended. Hope this answers your question. k
1332746
I have always assumed it was the Standard Process logo - SP. I will say that I have been taking these supplements for about ten years. I have found them to be the best calcium supplement that I have ever taken.
1332747
I can only assume but maybe "Standard Process" not sure that is what it is.
1332748
"Standard Process"- the brand name. Their products could be considered the "gold standard" in whole food supplements. I used to sell supplements and know that not all supplements can be helpful, due to ingredients and the way they are processed. I support these products 100%, with no financial interest in the company or products.
2261468
Good pickup on that label error! They obviously used a stock label photo and super imposed Sucralose on it. The product I received was, in fact, 100% Sucralose with no other additives and it had the correct label. There is no way to pass 'Creatine Monohydrate' off as a sweetener.
533882
a little over 100. I am pretty sure the 112 stands for 112 but it had a lot for the money.
210640
Both are available and have different part numbers. Select antique or polished and compare numbers. I think they are also available in white. They are also available in two sizes.
1805603
The 100 is a tin door and body that only has hinges on the left side, the 200 is ABS plastic and can hinge from both sides. I just installed the 200 in our bath because its plastic and can't rust. I painted the door to mach the trim and look very nice
441338
The formula is SPF 32. The bullet points contained a typo. FDA changed the OTC monograph in 2011, enforceable in 2012, and we had to have all the formulas retested under it, instead of the 1999 monograph, which while never enforced was still the proper way to test sunscreens. The formulas tested a bit higher under the 2011 monograph, but inconsequentially; the difference in protection between SPF 20 and 32 is about 2% (95% vs 97%) given the non-linear mathematics of SPF and UV protection. The formula is labeled correctly at SPF 32.
1164075
I am not 100% sure of the differences but I have a few good guesses. I think the weight limit is higher on the 1900. Mine is 350 lbs and when I was researching I think the 1400's limit is 250 lbs. I believe there are more height adjustment settings on the 1900. I think the 1900 has 12 compared to 8 on the 1400. the 1900 comes with the pilates bar. The only down side if you want this for doing pilates, is you get only one leg pulley. It is difficult to tell by only comparing the photos, but I think the 1900 may be a little sturdier than the 1400. for me, I figured an additional 30 dollars was worth it when I was making my choice as I wanted the higher weight limit and the pilates function. Hope this helps.
2214830
Greetings: Send us any and all numbers or markings that you can find on both old supports. We can tell using the numbers which to suggest. Thank You, Lou Fishman
390032
357/303's are considered equivalent to LR44's. The former are contain silver oxide while the latter are alkaline. 357/303's are more expensive but also maintain their voltage with use as well as having longer life.
424970
From what I can tell, looks like they made a change to the framing. Look at the pics on the 199 one and it shows you. I have the 174.99 one and I love it! :)
2266897
I believe the C just stands for CLASSIC style, that is why I went with it, because it resembles in a updated version of the old original Mitchell 300, hope this helps define your question.
1860530
You have to call convatec (1800=422=8811) Numberon the bottle. Date is coded on the bottle. Good for 5 yrs from that date.
2065935
Stamped on the label of Calcium Reagent B, and compare it to the list of faulty batches: 1993, 2003, 2013, 2023, 2033, 2043, 2053, 2063, 2073, 2083, 2093, 2103, 2113, 2123, 2133.Those were the only batch's that were faulty.
1062257
Ct is the abbreviation for count. Yes, they are softgels, but it is still a 180ct. So, both are correct.
9918
850/1900 is for usa and north america only. 900/1800 is for africa, europe and asia
1393242
I noticed the picture of the box at the top of the page said 185+ breeds and the box further down on the page and also at the test's website say 190+. That may have prompted the above question and my question of if the one directly through Amazon is current? Thank you.
1800385
Dragon girl, I remember reading about the difference in the numbers 1, 2and 3 back when I started using collagen. I just googled it. Sorry I'm not much help.:-) But I do like the Great Lakes that I'm taking.