"what is the diference between this model and the GM-6400F 4-Channel wich one is better ?"
1330364
The 6400 is listed as a "previous model", so it looks like it's one generation behind the 6500. The 6400 has 160-watts less power for max output, and 60-watts less power continuous for subs in bridged mode. If you plan to use for subs on Channel-B and mid/high on Channel-A, then the 6500 is the best choice. The 6500 also has a variable low-pass filter to allow you to tune your sub frequency cross-over. Both are type A/B, so either is a good fit for mixing subs and mid/high use on same amp. (Although A/B amps do get much hotter than D-types. D-types are only good for subs as they don't need as much accuracy in producing the sound.) The 6400 is listed as a "previous model", so it looks like it's one generation behind the 6500. The 6400 has 160-watts less power for max output, and 60-watts less power continuous for subs in bridged mode. If you plan to use for subs on Channel-B and mid/high on Channel-A, then the 6500 is the best choice. The 6500 also has a variable low-pass filter to allow you to tune your sub frequency cross-over. Both are type A/B, so either is a good fit for mixing subs and mid/high use on same amp. (Although A/B amps do get much hotter than D-types. D-types are only good for subs as they... » Read More The 6400 is listed as a "previous model", so it looks like it's one generation behind the 6500. The 6400 has 160-watts less power for max output, and 60-watts less power continuous for subs in bridged mode. If you plan to use for subs on Channel-B and mid/high on Channel-A, then the 6500 is the best choice. The 6500 also has a variable low-pass filter to allow you to tune your sub frequency cross-over. Both are type A/B, so either is a good fit for mixing subs and mid/high use on same amp. (Although A/B amps do get much hotter than D-types. D-types are only good for subs as they don't need as much accuracy in producing the sound.) « Show Less
1330365
I will contradict the others with: Go with the other one. Yes, the setup to this one is simple, but in the span of 45 days, I've lost 2 channels out of it. I simply dont care for items that fail just as it goes out of the warranty period. Go with the other one.
1330366
Works great with 10 inch sub. Was told it could push two of the same sub I had. But on the specs I'm not to sure maybe watts
1330367
I really do not know, but i love the one i have. I sounds great and very simple.
2274651
ty m. joachim, I appreciate you taking the time to get back to me about this subject, i will look into that VGA input connection to see if theres any difference between the S cable...the ln46b650 model seems to have all the features i'm looking for but obviously a higher price....thx again..very much apreciated!!!
1411658
I did not realize that there are tow models bought mine fron two diffrant poeple years apart both work great one is a n and the other has no model on it just am21. Had em for 3 years direct tv would not sell me ine straight out right. So I bought each one for $30.00 @ diffrant years off CL ,
2080874
They are almost the same, but the 6200 is a slightly older model with a wider frame, the 6400 has a narrower frame around the screen - did the research too, good luck...
1322297
If I look at the specs on that one, it appears that the difference is the Intel Quick Sync Video for fast video encodingand the Display Port for driving 4k displays. This might be a newer model. I would go with the NUC D54250WYK if you plan on getting a 4k tv.
88023
I regret I don't have an answer for you. When I purchased this box, I returned it the next day, due to the fact it was lacking features of the previous model. I would suggest going to ChannelMaster's website and see if they have a chat feature under technical support. Good luck!
59870
The 600U has a few more bells & whistles. It accepts a cable card if your cable company supports that, has a VGA input for your computer, can display picture in picture (or split screen!) from 2 sources, has better speakers, and in my humble opinion looks a little nicer. There is no difference in the picture quality, both will have the same great picture. Both display in the same resolution. I just had to make the decision on what to buy, and I saved the $$ and got the 60U last week. The only perk I was really interested in was the picture in picture, but that's wasn't worth it to me, and Dish Network has a HD receiver that will do it internally (if I go that route). Anyway, hope this helps! Matt
1526535
The only difference is, the more expensive one has a built in noise amplifier. I bought the less expensive one and I get all the major channels except Fox 8. They are all approximately 50-75 miles away from my home, not sure why Fox does not come in. I am very happy with it.
1034335
I've had my 52" 650 since memorial dday weekend...and coming from the video industry, it's the best screen around. For thos of you comparing the 650 vs 750 vs 850; check the technical details even at a store. I walked into the CC & BB locally and yes they were all set up side by side; but since the local store wanted to sell more 850s, it was "tuned" better. The default settings have changed including the brightness level; so when you are comparing TV screens; make sure that the identical output; down to the connection is being used and that both units are identically tuned, i.e. brightness, contrast, presets...99% of the time you will find them not to be. The best tuned TV this week will not be the one next week!
1367406
The main difference is that the ht-e6500w is the older model. The newer one appears to have a bit more versatile TV and internet connectivity. I would suggest that if you can still find the older model, new and in the box, you might be able to get a much lower prize. I don't use min often but I do enjoy it when I do. I did a wiring mod whereby if have my old JBL Athena's hooked up as the front and the systems front and rears wired is series for the back. Works pretty good. Hope I've helped a bit.
1101410
N.D.,Your statement isn't entirely correct. If you look @ both spec sheets, you'll notice they both have 6000:1 contrast ratios. The only difference that I see is one has a cable card slot (96D) where the 95D doesn't.
785274
I and other members of avsforum.com have found a significant difference that isn't listed between the 650 and 750. Then 750 has the ability to play 2 HD channels at the same time using your PIP function, the 650 can't. The way to achieve this is if you have cable split the incoming wire before it gets to the box, run 1 wire to the tv hooking up with coaxil cable then run the other wire to your cable box and hook the cable box up using your hdmi/component cables. scan the channels in that are connected through the coax cable. You can also achieve 2 hd pictures by hookinh up an over the air ant. and scanning the channels in. Works great, too bad the 650 can't do it.Mosh~~ I and other members of avsforum.com have found a significant difference that isn't listed between the 650 and 750. Then 750 has the ability to play 2 HD channels at the same time using your PIP function, the 650 can't. The way to achieve this is if you have cable split the incoming wire before it gets to the box, run 1 wire to the tv hooking up with coaxil cable then run the other wire to your cable box and hook the cable box up using your hdmi/component cables. scan the channels in that are connected through the coax cable. You can also achieve 2 hd pictures by hookinh up an over the air... » Read More I and other members of avsforum.com have found a significant difference that isn't listed between the 650 and 750. Then 750 has the ability to play 2 HD channels at the same time using your PIP function, the 650 can't. The way to achieve this is if you have cable split the incoming wire before it gets to the box, run 1 wire to the tv hooking up with coaxil cable then run the other wire to your cable box and hook the cable box up using your hdmi/component cables. scan the channels in that are connected through the coax cable. You can also achieve 2 hd pictures by hookinh up an over the air ant. and scanning the channels in. Works great, too bad the 650 can't do it.Mosh~~ « Show Less
481460
More internal memory on GMC320, rechargeable battery, electronic gyroscope, temperature sensor, and contrast control seems to be the differences. Perhaps the additional memory is the most significant. See the chart comparing them at http://www.gqelectronicsllc.com/support/GQ_Geiger_Counter_Selection_Guide.png
697833
I am certainly no TV guru but, I had purchased the LN40A550 & returned it & bought the LN40A650 & could not be happier! We noticed immediately that the picture looked faded on the 550 & went to one of the local retailers & found that this is a common complaint on these units. They actually had a LN40A550 & LN40A650 side by side in the store & there is a huge difference. We are very impressed with the picture quality regardless of what we are watching. We have had many friends commenting on the awesome picture on this TV. Hope this helps. Les
1602289
at least one big difference is the HDMI switching. 6200 is the winner hands down. 5200 is pass through without sound as I understand it.
359431
They are both very similar in the technology used for the antenna. I have used the Amazon amplified version for over a month now and am very happy with the unit. I did find that I had to manually add some of the channels as my automatic scan did not pick up many of the channels. Once I did the manual add, I get channels that I didn't even have available with cable. I live in an area where I get Detroit and Toledo channels over the air.
1327857
I don't know the difference between the two--only that one is a newer model than the other. You should research the model numbers.