I am 183 cm height, 177 Ibs. Normally I wear 32Wx34L pants. Which size should I choose? Thanks.
527431
If you wear a large in the cycling shorts then you should purchase a large. Knowing you are a 32 x 34, I would recommend a Large.
527432
I'd just bought S size of it. So, I don't know exactly. I guess it's made of general size. I think you should focus on waist more. Thanks, anyway.
527433
I would guess medium. I'm 260 lbs and 6'1" with a 31" inseam. The XXL fit well but are very long. I'm guessing a 34 inseam would be no problem for the medium.
36301
I sized my pants from my underwear size S/M/L. I am 6' and 225lbs so I had to get XL and they fit wonderfully. The waist band is very good elastic allowing a tight but very comfortable fit. Hope this helps.Jim
208047
I am an 8 in pants normally and my mom measured me off of their measuring chart(different website, different pants, same brand) and thought I was a 34, got them and were SO big on me. Sent them back and from these comments it looks like I would be a 30.Got full refund and will be getting a 30, even though they were super baggy, they were sosososo comfy.
970131
I am 5'8 and 170, I went with large which are perfect for lounging and yoga but a little loose in the waist for running. Still my absolute favorite pair of pants EVER.
117226
I am 33'' in the waist as well and they fit great! I do not think you will be unhappy if you go with 34''. My 32'' waist 5.11s are a little too tight. If you wear a belt they will be very comfortable with 34''.
282979
I would recommend the regular. My son is a 28x30 and we got the small regular. There is Velcro at the waist to tighten. The pants really look good.
1463196
I usually wear 33x32 pants and Large is perfect. Not tight around the waist, and legs are 1/16" above the ground. They do have an adjustable drawstring, so sizes should be somewhat flexible!
91754
I'm 6'1" and the mediums fit me perfectly. I'm a skinny to athletic build. My normal pants size is 30-32 waist and 33 length. Hope this helps you.Peace,LtitleBear
999270
Hmm. Well, I am currently a little bit smaller than a 33 inch waist and I have a pair of these knickers in a medium. I would say I am comfortable in a 32 but could pull off a 31, and with my medium knickers I have been thinking of getting a pair in a small because I have the adjustable waistband pulled as tight as it can be with the medium size. I would say try them out in a medium but you may be comfortable in a small.
34147
Excuse me, my name is Pablo from ecuador! My english ia very bad very, but i am 34waist with lenght 32! And it is perfect for me.Even i wear my jean, and it is fit! I think you must use yhe size S, of course the size S! I hope help you!!!
759092
I would suggest a size 6...I'm 5'5'' @120lbs and wear a size 4 comfortably. There's extra elastic stretch in waist also. They ship unhemmed, which is a great thing, so you have them hemmed for your liking! These pants are wonderful!!
1754
I am 6'4" 232 lbs with where a 34 pant and I got an XL and they fit great. I would say you should probably go M or L. It would probably depend if you are most concerned with waist or size or leg length. They stretch pretty well so I would say go with what fits your legs best.
105770
I am also 5'11", 240 with a 42 waist. The pants were slightly long but not uncomfortably long causing tripping, etc. I got the XL. Hope this helps.
1186999
The medium should work. These pants will seem really long when you first get them but don't worry, they fit perfectly after being washed.
3607
I think so. I have a 104cm waist/100cm hips and wear the 34's comfortably. The 36's (and i wear loose fit 36 jeans) are a little on the large side, and while usable, the 34's are much better for me. I assume the 30/32 would be similar.
339513
Based on your waist width and height, I would recommend going with the Medium-Tall size in the Columbia Bugaboo II pants.
29542
I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the... » Read More I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. « Show Less