How is the comparison between sx280 and sx260?
1346599
Sorry I do not have any personal experience with the sx260. I do like the sx280 a lot except for the movie function. In movie mode the battery managment is very bad and actually shuts the camera off after only minute or two of recording even on a freshly charged, high capacity battery. I followed the instructions to update the camera firmware, but it made no dofference with this problem on my camerra. Some people claim that their camera was fixed using this update but mine was not. My movie mode is virtually useless to me because of the battery issue. For the SX 260 I could only suggest reading other peoples reviews. I hope this helps. Sorry I do not have any personal experience with the sx260. I do like the sx280 a lot except for the movie function. In movie mode the battery managment is very bad and actually shuts the camera off after only minute or two of recording even on a freshly charged, high capacity battery. I followed the instructions to update the camera firmware, but it made no dofference with this problem on my camerra. Some people claim that their camera was fixed using this update but mine was not. My movie mode is virtually useless to me because of the battery issue. For the SX 260 I could only suggest... » Read More Sorry I do not have any personal experience with the sx260. I do like the sx280 a lot except for the movie function. In movie mode the battery managment is very bad and actually shuts the camera off after only minute or two of recording even on a freshly charged, high capacity battery. I followed the instructions to update the camera firmware, but it made no dofference with this problem on my camerra. Some people claim that their camera was fixed using this update but mine was not. My movie mode is virtually useless to me because of the battery issue. For the SX 260 I could only suggest reading other peoples reviews. I hope this helps. « Show Less
1346600
Hi: Never owned the sx260. However, have used and owned the sx280 and it's one dynamite camera. It has so many features, I have not used them all..but it takes stunning pictures with settings in the camera for poster size 16x20 to thumbnail for specific e-mail.Perfect for downloads, I use Shutterfly. Have taken hundreds of pictures since July 2013.Go for it! I noticed a recent price drop on Amazon..does not come with memory. Must buy a memory card. I bought the 32GB..enough to hold nearly 1,000 pictures! Good luck! Hope this helped. Tony
1346601
Ignoring the sx280's battery problem, it has wi-fi and superior low-light performance.
1721985
Thanks for the gory details. Its flaky metering, fumbling auto-focus and inexcusably slow (F:5.7@100mm) telephoto definitely knock the Canon SX10 off my list. What were the designers at Canon thinking? The FZ28 with its fat lens and RAW recording looks better and better.
56179
I'm NC45 as well and I believe sx11 would be the better choice. However after using mine for a while wondering why it was so light I realized Amazon sent me sx 01 instead of 11. So I dont even use it and I won't be purchasing another.
861885
Hello Jack, I have not done that comparison I'm afraid. But I had the LUMIX FZ200, which does compare to the RX10, and I can say that i like the SONY better.
1721984
The FZ28 is a really nice camera -- arguably slightly better than the Canon on image quality and IS and almost certainly better on the UI, where Canon just does a terrible job in some ways. (Who came up with the rotating wheel on the SX10? It drives me crazy every time I have to use it.)The make-or-break feature for me, though, and the reason I went with the Canon, is that the Lumix lacks a hotshoe for external flash. A good off-camera flash gives you so much more versatility in what, when, and how you shoot.
1452222
The A77 and the A3000 both record the same 1080 24p video. You might also consider the A58, the A77 is weather resistant. the extra pixel count is in the still photographs, not the video . Biggest difference in A77 and A3000 is in build quality, things it can do, the focus system, and size. Stop by a camera store, if you can, and get a feel for the camera. If you only need video buy a dedicated video camera.
320072
Your image quality will be second to none when comparing against the 28-300. We have the 35, 50 and 85 (all 1.8), and we couldn't be happier. May look into selling the 28-300 and getting a 70-200 in addition to the 3 primes.
1117823
yes I use it with the sx280,but it does not fix the indicator problem,but they do seem to work as good as the canon battery that came with the camera,love the camera,havn't tried the software download yet but others have said it doesn't fix the battery light from flashing when videoing, don't do a lot of videoing but when we do we just ignore the light.
2197153
http://snapsort.com/cameras/Canon-PowerShot-SX280-HS-specs The short answer is: No.
2145502
As far as I know, the differences are minimal....Both are excellent; save the $20,go with the 190XB. I love mine.
653984
The SX260 takes excellent low light/no flash pictures. It has a special setting on the function wheel on the back for just this. It actually takes 4 quick pictures with one push of the shutter and then overlays/combines them to come up with an excellent picture. Just remember to hold the camera very still until the 4 "clicks" stop...about 1-2 seconds. For me, it is one of the best features.
154002
Thank you! I haven't heard of the sx40 i'll check it out. I really like the specs. On the sx230. The images looked better than the Sony hx9 I was gonna get. But the canon seem to beat it with quality of picture. Thanks again
181721
The 227 is 720p vs 1080p fps 30 vs 15night vision same64gb vs 128gbI have the 227 with some issues not totally happy with it
309946
The SX120 at ISO 800 and 1600 is way better than the SX110, this is the biggest difference I've seen. Search for some reviews that have the same shots at ISO1600 for both cameras and compare the two side by side and it'll jump out at you. I'm not so sure the slightly smaller sensor has much difference, sensor technology improves very slowly too, so maybe it has better signal to noise ratio even though it's more MP on a slightly smaller surface area.I don't like the SX200 for a bunch of reasons, the always up flash is annoying. It has a slower lens than the SX110/120, and it's way more expensive. The SX120 at ISO 800 and 1600 is way better than the SX110, this is the biggest difference I've seen. Search for some reviews that have the same shots at ISO1600 for both cameras and compare the two side by side and it'll jump out at you. I'm not so sure the slightly smaller sensor has much difference, sensor technology improves very slowly too, so maybe it has better signal to noise ratio even though it's more MP on a slightly smaller surface area.I don't like the SX200 for a bunch of reasons, the always up flash is annoying. It has a slower lens than the SX110/120, and it's... » Read More The SX120 at ISO 800 and 1600 is way better than the SX110, this is the biggest difference I've seen. Search for some reviews that have the same shots at ISO1600 for both cameras and compare the two side by side and it'll jump out at you. I'm not so sure the slightly smaller sensor has much difference, sensor technology improves very slowly too, so maybe it has better signal to noise ratio even though it's more MP on a slightly smaller surface area.I don't like the SX200 for a bunch of reasons, the always up flash is annoying. It has a slower lens than the SX110/120, and it's way more expensive. « Show Less
2024049
Sorry. I am not familiar with sx240 to give you any comparison information.
1969855
I am certainly no expert on either camera, however I do own the WB850F model. The main differences I can see from looking at specs on both are these: WB850F: 21x optical zoom TL220: 4.6x optical zoom Having a good optical zoom capability is important to me; your situation may be different of course. Recording video with WB850F can be at 1080p resolution. With the TL220 it appears to be limited to 720p, which is still technically HD, just not as high definition as 1080p is. The TL220 has both front and back LCD screens which should make taking pictures of yourself easier (hold the camera up on front of your face and shoot type of photos). The WB850F does not have this. Lastly the WB850F can take photos of 16 megapixels while the TL220 maxes out at 12.2 megapixels (if that matters to you). I hope this helps.
2229145
I like SX280 very much. However, the battery life is short. Basically you have to recharge it every day. Plus, the cheap replacements of genuine Cannon batteries are even shorter. So I cannot compare the quality of pictures between SX260 and SX280 but I love pictures I get with SX289.