Does anyone know how this uit compares to the Bushnell Neo-XS?
1327378
don't know this unit did not work. it is the second item I have bought from them and it has been the same thing. cannot get it to work. Don't buy it.
1850458
I found on my X-A1 that the focusing is pretty fast though it does Hunt a bit. hunting may be less on cameras with phase detection.
440001
First http://www.bushnell.com/getmedia/7efa876c-ffe9-48fa-bd4a-0b3c3c9a27ce/2012_EliteTactical_SpecialReticles.pdf?ext=.pdf
2124814
Don't know about the Bushnell, but this Nikon model is well known for its excellent optical design -- part of a new generation of computer designed optics that has made such glass less expensive than older trial and error designs. Also plenty of rave reviews of this model -- there is one in Cool Tools.com.
1708650
My friend has the nikons and I have the Bushnell legends he even says the Bushnell s are better . They are more crisp and clear but either way you can't go wrong I like both
2151078
I haven't compared the two but here in New England, where long range shots are rare, the 2-3 is more practical and the 12 is not useful. I've used the 9x only once to see antlers and even then, there was so much brush and limbs in the way that the magnification was really no help. I've never hunt out west but I could imagine the 4-12 might be more appropriate there.
1035269
yeah, I have it... its a decent one for the money. im a little spoiled because I have it, and a sightmark 2x24 NV bino and those are really nice, but expensive. I have this one and Firefield Nvader 1-3X Digital Night Vision Monocular, and I did not like the Nvader.
1011661
Hi thomyi, you may try checking on the link below for the direct comparison between the two lenses. -Elyhttp://store.sony.com/gsi/webstore/WFS/SNYNA-SNYUS-Site/en_US/-/USD/ViewProductCompareService-Show?CategoryID=on0KmUBxnZQAAAFEYhlScEcW
236184
My son and I are both birders. He has the Monarch 5 and I have the Bushnell Legend. He is 40 and I am 64. We have switched back and forth and are pleased with the performance and features of both. He claims the Nikon lenses are superior but he has a Nikon camera and is biased...I would go with either.
164644
The S&B; has better glass that is for sure but your not paying the extra $$$$ and you get a life time warranty were S&B; PMII are only a 2 year now. The glass is go enough and the FOV is very good also. I prefer the ET35215 DMR Bushnell 3.5-21x50 DMR 34mm, H-59, Matte Black and the ET35215G DMR 3.5-21x50 Matte 34mm, G2DMR, .1 Mil, Box. Mike @ CSTACTICAL
2191697
i too was disapptd w/fact that there is no adjustment on the bushnells--guess u take them for what they are--it does give a decent broad angle for stadium sports--
85843
Sorry, I don't know how it compares to these other Binoculars. Mine is particularly bad. It arrived out of alignment and the chromatic aberration is extreme. Apparently it is a hit and miss with this one. I didn't expect much at the price but this example was horrendous. I would not buy again. I prefer not to play the lottery with optics. My suggestion is to try them first and then buy the same one you actually tried not take a chance that one in the box will be the same.
1196604
I won't go as far as to say FZ18 is featureless but I will say that the older one hands down takes better photos. (I have new one/brother has old one). Image quality IS not as good, even with the steadiest of hands. I'd recommend going with older one until sensor is improved in new model.
1874912
No. the images of both cameras are very very good, and both use the same sensor. I've had both cameras, and I chose to move to the XT-1 because of all the features,new dials,intervalometer and the incredible EVF. Some prefer the rangefinder look and feel of the XE2, I like the ergonomics and feel of the XT better. It comes down to personal preference.
669216
I own both and have used them on deer rifles for several years. I can truthfully say in the field I see absolutely no difference. Dropped a nice buck 15 minutes before legal shooting time was over one evening a week ago using a Pro-Staff scope. Light was waning but I was able to put a good shot on him some 150 yards away with the light transmission from the Nikon.
632235
the non primos one has clear shot. its cool, it tells you the highest point of your arrows path so you can see if a branch is in the way. all in all not needed but nice to have. it is also able to be calibrated where the primos is not. there is definitely more to the non primos, its the next edition to it looks like primo stopped the partnershipBushnell 202442 The Truth ARC 4x20mm Bowhunting Laser Rangefinder with Clear Shot the video goes over the new stuff
519920
I sold mine for $50 and got a more expensive one that works much better. The guy I sold it to uses it to measure to bunkers and trees but not pins. My Bushnell Tour V3 is fast, accurate and easy to use. The 850 is not.