which is best for a 24-36" HDTV? Can't figure this out...tv/monitor combo or just TV. My primary use is to watch movies, second to see the World Cup this summer. SamsungT260 or P2570 or Panasonic Viera ( 720p)? Any help would be appreciated. I have lived TV-less for ten years.... which is best for a 24-36" HDTV? Can't figure this out...tv/monitor combo or just TV. My primary use is to watch movies, second to see the World Cup this summer. SamsungT260 or P2570 or... » Read More which is best for a 24-36" HDTV? Can't figure this out...tv/monitor combo or just TV. My primary use is to watch movies, second to see the World Cup this summer. SamsungT260 or P2570 or Panasonic Viera ( 720p)? Any help would be appreciated. I have lived TV-less for ten years.... « Show Less
1232752
When you have a screen under 30" 1080p doesnt really matter http://s3.carltonbale.com/resolution_chart.html
1334160
or do wait with the idea that some 24-26" 1080ps will show up on the market soon?
1262698
That's good to know Bridger. I have this one (Samsung plasma PN50B450) as well and the manual states that brightness and contrast should be reduced to prevent burn in while play video games. Also appreciate the first hundred hour rule-mixing tv with games.Thanks. The only thing I'm worried about is my kids walking away from a video game and a screen just sitting there. But hey, for the price you could buy another one and not spend what you can for a 1080p lcd 52 inch. I know that defeats the purpose but isn't that why you would be interesed in this tv anyways? for the price?
759412
I currently have the A3 for my 40" 1080i Samsung LCD. I also picked up a new A35 from Best Buy for $150. Now I have a back up/player, If I decide to upgrade to a 1080p TV. Go online to bestbuy.com, see if the stores in your area have any available. If they do, then run! At this price they're going very fast.Remember the five free movie rebate is still going, you have until 2/28.
487645
CCD, the 1080P by Sharp is fantastic. I went with the highest resolution possible and I am NOT dissatisfied. The picture is phenomenal with an HD signal. My wife and I watch this TV in our bedroom more now than the 38" tube HDTV in the livingroom.Go with the Sharp. I do not think you'll be disappointed.
474189
For 8ft to 12ft viewing distance, definitely go with 52" if price isn't an issue. You won't regret it. I too was in the same boat, 9 ft viewing distance and went with the 52". Couldn't be happier. It was shockingly big at first but don't worry you'll get used to it. PS. only had 26" CRT prior to my 52A550.
561930
I know I am going to get blasted for this. I personally think that as far as Blu-Ray standalones that this player is the best option available. That being said investing over $400 in one of these when you don't have an HDMI V1.3 display (1080p/24p) is just plain insane as you are spending a whole bunch of extra money with technology that you won't use until you upgrade your set/projector. I would go with a Toshiba A3 which has 720p/1080i capabilities and costs a whopping $118.49 shipped. If nothing else the price difference is significant enough that you could make use of it until the prices on things like the panasonic or the better HDTV sets comes down to the point where it is more affordable. I know I am going to get blasted for this. I personally think that as far as Blu-Ray standalones that this player is the best option available. That being said investing over $400 in one of these when you don't have an HDMI V1.3 display (1080p/24p) is just plain insane as you are spending a whole bunch of extra money with technology that you won't use until you upgrade your set/projector. I would go with a Toshiba A3 which has 720p/1080i capabilities and costs a whopping $118.49 shipped. If nothing else the price difference is significant enough that you could make use of it until the... » Read More I know I am going to get blasted for this. I personally think that as far as Blu-Ray standalones that this player is the best option available. That being said investing over $400 in one of these when you don't have an HDMI V1.3 display (1080p/24p) is just plain insane as you are spending a whole bunch of extra money with technology that you won't use until you upgrade your set/projector. I would go with a Toshiba A3 which has 720p/1080i capabilities and costs a whopping $118.49 shipped. If nothing else the price difference is significant enough that you could make use of it until the prices on things like the panasonic or the better HDTV sets comes down to the point where it is more affordable. « Show Less
781505
Hey take it easy buddy. If your head explodes, then how are you gonna watch your new TV?Here is a page on LCD TV calibration: http://www.lcdtvbuyingguide.com/lcdtv/lcd-tv-calibration.htmlIf you cannot decide which LCD TV to buy, here are some quick picks from Consumer Reports from the November 2007 issue.Best 32-inches sets: * Sony Bravia KDL-32S3000 , $1100 * Sony Bravia KDL-32XBR4 , $1400 * Toshiba REGZA 32HL67 , $900 * Panasonic TC-32LX700 , $950 * Samsung LN-T3242H , $900Good values 32-inch sets: * Olevia 532H , $650 * RCA L32WD22 , $650Hope this helps. 8-)-S.C.- Hey take it easy buddy. If your head explodes, then how are you gonna watch your new TV?Here is a page on LCD TV calibration: http://www.lcdtvbuyingguide.com/lcdtv/lcd-tv-calibration.htmlIf you cannot decide which LCD TV to buy, here are some quick picks from Consumer Reports from the November 2007 issue.Best 32-inches sets: * Sony Bravia KDL-32S3000 , $1100 * Sony Bravia KDL-32XBR4 , $1400 * Toshiba REGZA 32HL67 , $900 * Panasonic TC-32LX700 , $950 * Samsung LN-T3242H , $900Good values 32-inch... » Read More Hey take it easy buddy. If your head explodes, then how are you gonna watch your new TV?Here is a page on LCD TV calibration: http://www.lcdtvbuyingguide.com/lcdtv/lcd-tv-calibration.htmlIf you cannot decide which LCD TV to buy, here are some quick picks from Consumer Reports from the November 2007 issue.Best 32-inches sets: * Sony Bravia KDL-32S3000 , $1100 * Sony Bravia KDL-32XBR4 , $1400 * Toshiba REGZA 32HL67 , $900 * Panasonic TC-32LX700 , $950 * Samsung LN-T3242H , $900Good values 32-inch sets: * Olevia 532H , $650 * RCA L32WD22 , $650Hope this helps. 8-)-S.C.- « Show Less
180823
Thanks Walker D.K. Do you think the PQ is significantly better on the G10 than the S1? I went in to BestBuy to try and compare but the two TVs were on opposite endcaps running different demos so I couldn't really compare the PQ. The BestBuy guy told me the G10 had a significantly better processor than the S1. Also, back to my original question: will an S1/BD60 combo give me full Viera cast functionality?
1339544
I had a 22" Samsung for 6 years and it performed beautifully. When I needed a larger screen I looked at Samsung. The 40" Samsung 6400 I bought also performs beautifully. I bought the 6400 because I can receive movies and text on my Laptop and see them on the TV Screen. I know I can do it on the 6400. If this is important to you, check to see if the 6300 can do it also. Bob C
70354
I went today to look at HDtv's. I saw both the 46XBR4 and the 3000W and another 3000? Sony. All I can say is that by far the XBR4 was crisper and brighter, it looked more like reality. They had ESPN-HD feed on from Direct-TV. Is the difference worth the price, that's something you have to decide. Go look at them, I saw them at CC. I actually spent a good hour in a recliner they had setup and just watched the 46XBR4 comparing it to the sets around it. This is the one I'm getting, it was simply the best picture constantly, even better than models bigger in size with 1080p. It really stood out in the finer details when next to the other sets.
302407
I don't know how much help I can be but I'll give it a shot. I bought the Samsung because I own a Samsung LCD 46" bought in '08. I was quite happy with that TV so I stuck with the Samsung brand. I really think the 46" has a better picture than the 65" LED. Could be because of a consequential loss of picture clarity that comes with larger screen sizes. The UN65 has a dual core processor but if you're really into "smart," I recommend the quad core (more money of course). I subscribe to NFL game replays and they won't load well (and therefore can't view) with the dual core; I have to use my quad core computer. I think the UN has a really reasonable price, but you generally get what you pay for (as the old saying goes). Bottom line . . . I like the UN65 but, at the same time, I am a little disappointed. The only way you'll ever know is to look at them side-by-side and remember, showrooms do not have real-life broadcasts (in most instances) so when you get one home, your picture may not be a great as in the showroom. Hope this helps somewhat and good luck!
180827
I'm currently in the 50G10 vs. 50S1 research mode, too. I want Viera cast (which the S1 doesn't have) but isn't it true I can get the same Viera cast capabilities if I buy the S1 and a blue-ray player that has Viera Cast, like the Panasonic DMP-BD80 or the BD60 (which now comes free w/ purchase of the S1 [or G10] from Amazon)?
387725
Make sure you look at the 4665 in person before buying. The picture is better than any other HDTV (imho), but the glass surface is HIGHLY reflective. If you have any lights in the area (or windows) it may be very distracting. I went with the 4661 at $1,600.
508472
I personally like the 50" Panasonic plasm. I have mostly looked at the 50PZ700u. I person I work with, who is a stickler for this kind of stuff, bought this TV and really has enjoyed it. According to him you really cant beat it without going up in price by a few thousand dollars. Just as a side note, best I can tell these couple of models use the same panel and just have a few minor differences. 50PZ700U - My preferred right now 50PZ750U - Same with some more plugs and color settings. Costs more as well. 50PZ77U - Not totally sure what the difference is, but it seems very similar.
918266
Hi! I have been reading up on both tv's and it looks like the panasonic V10 is by far the best of the both. I just purchased the sammy b860 and also trying to find a good deal with the panny V10 (since it cost more). Both tv's can display the 24p at 96hz(24hzx4=96hz), so since the panny G10 can only do the 24p at 48hz(ficker problem). That's why tto me the sammy B860 is bump to second best, but this sammy has a buzzing sound if you live high above sea level. Remember this is just my opinion. hope this help someone......:)
1930300
I found it cheaper at this seller. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/543202-REG/Panasonic_TH_42PX80U_TH_42PX80U_VIERA_Plasma_TV.htmlMaybe the price will go down more here at amazon.Also; abesofmaine.com has it with shipping and tax AND a free wall mount for $748.18 , BEAT THAT AMAZON!
17188
I'd like to ask you a question about the 24p content. I produce videos in 24p, and although I'm very creative, I'm not a tech guru. Thus, I've been trying to witness the difference between TV's out there that claim to have good 24p playback capabilities, as we produce several things at that frame rate. Have you seen them side by side? Does the lower Hz level really make a big difference? I've seen the 8000 in action, but never checked the Hz level and didn't compare it to the 7000. Thanks in advance for your help.