Can anyone with experience discuss the high Color Rendering Index (CRI) claimed by the manufacturer?
1342736
The color rendition of this ring light is great i had the lesser halo ring light . The color rendition of the halo 100 ring light is great my shots look great in every shot I take especially things like flowers and plants. I have used it with fashion before as well and clothing looks good to great as well.
298219
Color Calibrated (Calibration Report included), Hardware Calibration (Calibrator is not included), True Color Finder (S/W)
1556801
The color display is dependent on the graphics card itself, not the CPU chip. Make sure you have a good driver installed, and you might want to reseat the card if you're still having issues.
1618833
Have you tried any older systems to see if they look okay/have lag?Anyway, thanks for the info! I may have to go for this, although I'm a bit nervous not being able to return it if there are dead pixels or whatever.
1185263
As you may have noticed, in most older panels/laptops (which probably don't have IPS), there is massive color distortion at relatively small viewing angles. This monitor is exactly the same as the U2713HM, except that it also has IPS (in-plane switching), which produces, among other effects, much better color fidelity at off-center viewing angles. In other words, I can look at my monitor from .5 degrees away from parallel to the screen, and still have no noticeable color distortion.
1531521
If you did read my review, the colors are good AFTER you calibrate the monitor properly with proper equipment. Ofcourse the older TN panel can not match the IPS panels in colors, but the IPS panels are all currently (the affordable ones anyway) 60Hz. My previous monitor was an IPS monitor and after calibrating this properly i prefer this BenQ, but i think mostly because its bigger.So when you get your monitor, the colors are off, after calibration, theyre great. However do some research, maybe you dont really need a 120Hz panel and there might be something else out there for you, but im more than happy with mine.Mine:Gamut coverage 97.7% sRBGGamut volume 115.2% sRBGThe results are great. If you did read my review, the colors are good AFTER you calibrate the monitor properly with proper equipment. Ofcourse the older TN panel can not match the IPS panels in colors, but the IPS panels are all currently (the affordable ones anyway) 60Hz. My previous monitor was an IPS monitor and after calibrating this properly i prefer this BenQ, but i think mostly because its bigger.So when you get your monitor, the colors are off, after calibration, theyre great. However do some research, maybe you dont really need a 120Hz panel and there might be something else out there for... » Read More If you did read my review, the colors are good AFTER you calibrate the monitor properly with proper equipment. Ofcourse the older TN panel can not match the IPS panels in colors, but the IPS panels are all currently (the affordable ones anyway) 60Hz. My previous monitor was an IPS monitor and after calibrating this properly i prefer this BenQ, but i think mostly because its bigger.So when you get your monitor, the colors are off, after calibration, theyre great. However do some research, maybe you dont really need a 120Hz panel and there might be something else out there for you, but im more than happy with mine.Mine:Gamut coverage 97.7% sRBGGamut volume 115.2% sRBGThe results are great. « Show Less
1646897
Well, I can't give a textbook definition. But when buying an LCD or plasma, I would go by the "Native" or "Static" contrast ratio. Dynamic is an inflated number. I had to learn the hard way. Bought 32" Sammy LCD and thought that 7000:1 "Dynamic" contrast ratio meant something. End up finding out the "Static" or "Native" was actually 1500:1. A lot of companies won't even list the true number. 30,000:1 is pretty high. Visually I don't know how it stacks up to 20,000:1 though. I would think that 33% more would be better and noticeable. I hope so since my 42PZ85U is arriving on the 10th. Higher is always better, if you ask me. I hate it when blacks look like charcoal. You will definitely notice it with LCD's. And I really hate that backlight and motion-blur. LCD makes for great computer monitors. But I have yet to see a high-end LCD hold a candle to even a mid-range plasma. LCD is more popular right now so people will buy into the hype. I did. Hope this helped a little.
1184631
I now have 4 x Dell P2715Q 4k 60hz monitors running on the NVS 510 just fine. No noticeable difference from 4 x 1440p. Open a couple hd videos at once and they will get choppy but normal office work is totally fine. I would give extreme caution about 2160p at 27" though. I've run into several issues with this pixel density on Windows. Several programs have nearly invisible UI elements they are so small. Many/most programs ignore windows display magnification settings so you're at the mercy of the application developers to update their software. I'm trying to decide right now if I should return the 4 monitors and give it another year or stick it out. If this wasn't a business machine with only a few pro apps that will hopefully be updated over the next few months and was running many consumer apps, there would be no question. I'd be returning them and waiting for sure. It would be a mess. On the other hand, 1440p at 27" is not quite dense enough. Text is a little fuzzy. Some UI elements a little pixelated. But at least you can see everything.
1726373
NO, I tried and the most you get is 24 bit Color. :( . You your pics will be pixilated
1114385
I believe 857u has the edition off yellow pixel or fourth pixel color, CAN'T QUITE REMEMBER , strug gleled with the same thing when I bought mine.
235665
I've just bought the 2557, also replacing a 1490, which I really liked. I feel like this 2557 has horrible contrast, and as you say, all colors look weak and faded. Did you have any success with follow up regarding yours? Nothing I see on my screen matches the bright colors on the Garmin website or product sales card from the store. May return it, as it's quite frustrating and... oddly, distracting.
1112182
I am not entirely sure about the exact reasons, but my guess is that the panel used is not the A+ perfect pixel quality used by Qnix and maybe the warranty isn't as good. The other thing might be the company you send the item back to might be the Korean company itself and you would have you pay the full shipping price to send it back for repair or replacement
1303316
maybe double check the settings menu, I saw a "dynamic contrast" in there somewhere. Don't know if it would help any, or if it's default on or off, I was clicking all over the place! It could also be using more power to light up the screen? Is your video card good for the resolution? Just guesses....
1941202
Sorry, I don't know. This one is the first experience I have had with ASUS, and it is very good. I bought it on the recommendation of David Brooks of Shutterbug magazine, as being an excellent choice for color printing, as it has the controls to set the screen's color balance that most other monitors lack.
1920900
I believe the 650 is 12bit color processing and the 750 is 16bit color processing as well. Lately the 750 is CHEAPER than the 650 currently on here by about $25, but when I got my 750 at hhgregg last week it was $300 cheaper than the 650 O_o
397848
I bought mine last week; it has "a high-res full color graphical display". The greater portion of the information displayed is orange or white against a black background.
224299
Thanks for the reply. Please let us know if you are experiencing any of the freezing or color problems we've been seeing in the forum posts.