What is the difference between the VoiceBooster model 1505 and model 1506?
1347676
The 1506 has 10 watts of power and the 1505 has 12 watts of power. It depends on how you will use the product. I am a tour guide and have the 1506 because it is slightly smaller in size but covers the same square footage. The power difference is mainly for the battery life. The 1505 has a larger unit but will last a few hours longer of continuos use. Other than that, they are very similar.
1347677
Sorry, can't help but thought it would be polite to respond anyway; I'm basically satisfied with the product. God bless.
995677
I thought the same thing, so I emailed 66 audio to see if they were indeed the same. They responded very quickly stating that the Soundbots were knock offs made to look like their product, but using inferior bluetooth and sound components. This appears to be true as these are BT 2.1 and the 66 audio ones are 4.0. One of the main complaints in the comments in these is signal dropping, while the 66 audio has very little complaint regarding that. I suppose you take a chance with whatever you buy when you can't try things out first, however, 66 audio claims that they are not the same, and that they are in fact currently in litigation with Soundbot over the issue.
889701
The 160 can support multiple devices (up to 5) at one time whereas the 150/150a can only support one. 150a is the North American edition, updated from the 150.
1336893
I can't speak to the performance differences (if any). I purchased the CPM1084 because I needed a replacement. I bought my receiver used and the microphone that came with it was not functioning properly.
2236000
If you want a touch screen vs pushing buttons. And the 620 also somehow calculates VO2 when wearing the HR monitor. So basically you are paying the extra for touch screen. So if it is worth it to you. Go for it. And if not save the extra 150 and spend it on some new shoes!
893676
I found no other differences between the two. As a matter of fact, I purchased one of each mic and I can not tell the difference between them.
183624
As mentioned by others, the differences are the screen size and the replaceable battery. As a 705 user, the big advantage of the larger screen is when you want to set the unit on a table, or hook it on the back of a car seat, and sit back and watch it. It is probably also an advantage as a Web browser (although I would not buy either unit if Web browsing is the priority - get a PC). However, if you mainly want to use it as a DVR and MP3 player, or a hand-held video viewer, the 605 may be a better choice.
2051026
Basically it has the same number of features that the Logitech M305 has, the side scrolling function is there though no other added features like multimedia buttons added just like the higher end Logitech Wireless Mouse. The only difference is that the Logitech M505 supports the Unifying Receiver unlike the M305 which does not.Though the Logitech M505 needs 2 AA Batteries as compared to Logitech M305 which only needs 1 AA Battery, the lifespan of the M505 has a longer duration which as 15 months (as advertised) compared to M305 which is 6 months (as advertised) though my Logitech M305 lasted for 2 months only on a regular daily use. Basically it has the same number of features that the Logitech M305 has, the side scrolling function is there though no other added features like multimedia buttons added just like the higher end Logitech Wireless Mouse. The only difference is that the Logitech M505 supports the Unifying Receiver unlike the M305 which does not.Though the Logitech M505 needs 2 AA Batteries as compared to Logitech M305 which only needs 1 AA Battery, the lifespan of the M505 has a longer duration which as 15 months (as advertised) compared to M305 which is 6 months (as advertised) though my... » Read More Basically it has the same number of features that the Logitech M305 has, the side scrolling function is there though no other added features like multimedia buttons added just like the higher end Logitech Wireless Mouse. The only difference is that the Logitech M505 supports the Unifying Receiver unlike the M305 which does not.Though the Logitech M505 needs 2 AA Batteries as compared to Logitech M305 which only needs 1 AA Battery, the lifespan of the M505 has a longer duration which as 15 months (as advertised) compared to M305 which is 6 months (as advertised) though my Logitech M305 lasted for 2 months only on a regular daily use. « Show Less
635692
If I remember correctly, the 160 has a higher discharge velocity than the 150. In simple terms, the 160 has a higher trash blowing capaability.
1396588
I don't know the exact answer but I presume it comes calibrated. It seems to be very close to what actual numbers are when comparing to voice levels but if you're working with a margin of error I'd check with the manufacturer via their website
1917218
I have not seen any difference other than a little different styling. A different year perhaps? It sounds the same and it has the same on/off switch, volume controls, etc.
337773
You mean the speaker outputs, correct? I have the 605 which is last year's model as part of whatever the HTiB was back then. I tried some Monster dual-plugs and they did not fit. I ended up getting a whole bunch of single plugs from Monoprice for a fantastic price and taking the Monster ones back for a refund. The 7100 looks awesome. I wish I could upgrade :). The 605 only has two HDMI inputs and doesn't integrate with my Panasonic plasma like this one would. Oh well. Something is going to have to go component/optical so I can have all the switching via my receiver.
1369105
More same than different. The new UE model (this one) is 1.5 inches taller and half an inch deeper. The handle makes up the bulk of the extra height which the old one didn't have. The driver configuration is almost identical, 2 tweeters, 2 3inch woofers, and slightly bigger 2.5" passive radiators (old one had 2" radiators). The sound is near identical except the new one has more bass because of the larger radiators. The price went up quite a bit from $150 to $250 MSRP. I own the old one and still very satisfied with its low/mid/high balance. If you don't mind the lack of a handle and buying used, the old fine is a great deal.
337652
I've looked at the online manual for the DEQ2496 on the Behringer website, but relevant technical details are sketchy. If I were you I would contact a retailer that stocks both devices and ask someone there who is more familiar with the DEQ2496.
1523616
The models themselves are the same. The difference in lettering is based on the frequency programmed. See Shure's website to verify the best unit for you based on your geographic location and the primary location.
1869843
The newer version of the unit has a better mic. In fact, it has two to choose from - a directional and an omni-directional. You might consider using the directional for voice and switch to omni if you want the crowd sounds.
1134144
I am not sure of the difference as I have only heard the red one but I love it. It is easy to set up and keeps me from blowing the speaker on my phone.