Does this converter create a focal length conversion beyond the magnification caused by fuji's smaller sensor size? Light loss?
1357948
No, you need to spend a few hundred more dollars for something like the Metabones Speed Booster and I haven't noticed any light loss in really use. But, I don't pixel peak or run complicated lens tests to check.
1357949
1. re focal length conversion--no.2. re light loss--I have not noted any--but, frankly, I am usually using any / all of my adapter with a fixed f-stop setting or with AE.
1357950
1. re focal length conversion--no. 2. re light loss--I have not noted any--but, frankly, I am usually using any / all of my adapter with a fixed f-stop setting or with AE.
489798
I believe you (ranthon007) are operating under a false assumption. Regardless of what image size you choose to use, the actual physical pixels on the sensor must necessarily remain the size they are, and if that's too small to let in the ideal amount of light, well then you're stuck. I'm not sure whether smaller output sizes are done by rescaling or by simply using fewer of the pixels (i.e. not the whole sensor), but while you MAY be gaining some reduction of noise, there is NOT an actual increase of detail.(Anyone please correct me if any of the above is in at all incorrect!)
2232262
Hi Mark. Thank you for your question. No. This converter will not work well with that lens. We have found the best choice for that lens to be the 2.2x telephoto that goes on top rather than on the bottom. Thank you. Charlie.
462296
Maybe due to focal length they are classifying it as fixed zoom but I would disregard. Focal length is equivalent to 45mm on FX.
83928
There is a lock somewhere outside the lens near the body. This might prevent you from changing the focal length.
88549
Hi - Just double-checked a couple of OM lenses on my Sony a7r using this adapter. I want to make sure I'm completely understanding the question: if you're asking whether there will be any vignetting of the image, the answer is no (except to the extent that a specific lens shows some light falloff at the edges, but that's not an adapter issue, and you'd have the same phenomenon on an OM film body). If the question is whether or not the image will be cropped (using the term to refer to the so-called "crop factor" associated with smaller-than-24x36 sensors): again, the answer's no. OM lenses are full-frame lenses, the a7 is a full-frame body - so no cropping of the image. Hope that's helpful!
1030938
Yes, but the equivalent focal length will be 240-960mm, that is an APS-C sensor camera..
923680
No, Due to sensor size you do not want to use an EF-S size lens. There would be a vignette about half of the sensor size even if there was an adapter to use. There would be a big black circle around your whole image.
908316
This lens, DCR-2025PRO, I just bought for my Fujifilm X-S1. It works exellent with this kamera from fokal length from abouth 250/300mm and up to 624mm. This gives my camera å total fokal area from 24mm to abort 1370mm, or 57,2 x Zoom. The results of my testing so far is very good and I got som very crisp and detailed photos of the moon (as an example). I don
2183933
Im sorry I can't help you. I returned the converter because it would not fit my lenses&gt; It was compatible with my DX 3200. It was the lenses that was the problem.
824028
I believe so, because it adds a gap between the lens and the sensor. For example I was photographing the moon the other night. This would usually mean just setting the focus to infinity and going for it. However, with the adapter on, the moon was in focus some way back from the infinity point on the focusing ring, indicating that infinity has moved further away, so to speak. Hope this helps. :-)
1606298
This lens is a bit smaller in size,and takes sharper photos than the NOT "versionⅡ".
572353
You have to check if the diameter you choose corresponds to the diameter of the lens you have .If you look to the description included in fuji documentation as http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/pdf/lenses_accessories_catalogue_01.pdf you will find it!
1193278
I had a Fuji and the pics were washed out. Returned it and got the Canon SX110IS and if you want it you will have to pry it from my cold dead hands!...
1710416
Others have pointed out that Metabones makes a version specifically tailored for the BMPCC. This version is also a different conversion factor. If you were to have a non-speed boosting Nikon adapter and one of these you've effectively got two lenses taking one slot in your bag, a tele and a normal/wide. With the Blackmagic cameras one has the option of using this "generic" MFT converter and the higher magnification versions made for their camera and now you've got three lenses taking the space of only one in your bag. Tele, normal/wide, wide/ultra-wide
1009698
Not really. Even if you could find an adaptor, you would lose AF and you would have a circular picture as the image circle of the m43 lens is smaller than the Fuji sensor.
2265209
I use it on my GX7, which has a larger sensor and I think it looks great. The edges are a tad soft, but with the smaller sensor of the BMPCC you will not see the edge of this lens. This adapter converts the 14mm to 11mm. Just know that there are no filter threads on the front of the lens, so you can not attach a filter to the front.