Resperate vs. Stress Eraser: Has anyone made comparison between these 2 products?
234354
Not StressEraser, but I've tried emWave and Resperate. I like Resperate much better. EmWave feels like a test you have to do right and do well on. If you close your eyes when doing Resperate you don't even have to know your "numbers;" I'd rather just relax, follow the music and breathe.
1667953
I'm not sure there is a big difference, but the purifying gel is what works best for my skin type.
1602462
The Pro has 2 speeds and comes with Pro discs which give a more thorough microdermabrasion treatment. The Personal unit has one speed and comes with the discs for moderate (medium) exfoliation and sensitive skin types. I love the Pro because the lower speed can be used when I want the exfoliation the Personal unit gives and the higher speed when I need more exfoliation (like when the seasons change and I have more dead skin build-up). You can also use the higher speed with the sensitive discs and the lower speed with the (red) more abrasive tips. I love to use a peel like the Pumpkin Peel with a moderate PH level (before the PMD treatment) to soften up old/dry skin for amazing results when sloughing off the dead skin with the PMD unit. I also love to use a serum like the Epicuren Ultima Peptide after exfoliation because it soaks right into the skin. Use spf after using this device because you have new baby skin that needs protection from the sun.
1077335
Not sure If it's more effective. I just like the gel. It absorbs quickly and works well. I think it's a matter of personal preference. Both work great
623706
I've used both products and prefer ProSoft as it stays softer. Although not as long lasting as the harder PermaSoft it's much more comfortable for my sensitive gums, I reline approximately every 6 motnhs or so. Hard plastic...soft tissue... I don't know how anyone can possibly even wear dentures without a soft liner!
317071
I've done the math on the disposable versus the reusable Zeno. Disposable is cheaper so I will buy another one. Paid $35 and a 52-year old (lucky me for having zits for going on 40 years) and 19-year old have used it for AT LEAST a year and a half. If I had this when I was 13 year old, I would have hardly any scars on my face. It just works on the big, hurtful bumps but if you feel it coming up, it has never taken more than 3 apps to make it disappear. When I have forgotten to use it quickly enough or not resisted the urge to pick, it still reduces the time in healing. Simply the best acne product I've ever used in 40 years and I have tried everything, prescription and non. I've done the math on the disposable versus the reusable Zeno. Disposable is cheaper so I will buy another one. Paid $35 and a 52-year old (lucky me for having zits for going on 40 years) and 19-year old have used it for AT LEAST a year and a half. If I had this when I was 13 year old, I would have hardly any scars on my face. It just works on the big, hurtful bumps but if you feel it coming up, it has never taken more than 3 apps to make it disappear. When I have forgotten to use it quickly enough or not resisted the urge to pick, it still reduces the time in healing. Simply the best acne... » Read More I've done the math on the disposable versus the reusable Zeno. Disposable is cheaper so I will buy another one. Paid $35 and a 52-year old (lucky me for having zits for going on 40 years) and 19-year old have used it for AT LEAST a year and a half. If I had this when I was 13 year old, I would have hardly any scars on my face. It just works on the big, hurtful bumps but if you feel it coming up, it has never taken more than 3 apps to make it disappear. When I have forgotten to use it quickly enough or not resisted the urge to pick, it still reduces the time in healing. Simply the best acne product I've ever used in 40 years and I have tried everything, prescription and non. « Show Less
889327
The more expensive one has MSM in it which is for joint health. I use one or the other and cannot see any difference. I decided I'd rather purchase the less expensive one because of that. There doesn't appear to be any difference in the lotion as far as texture or thickness. I get good results from both as far as the magnesium in them. It helps leg cramps at night.
1063865
Don't know the answer. I think a battery-operated epilator (face trimmer) works better. I bought the Epilady from No More Rack.com for $15 and LOVE IT. 3 weeks between usages. Virginia Carroll
1754549
Just slightly less than the Memorex brand in my opinion, but it's hard to tell the difference. I tried a blind test with friends using the Kodak and Memorex. Most thought the sleeves were basically the same. Those who found a difference thought the Memorex was slightly better. If the prices were the same, I'd go with Memorex, but I've switched over to the Kodak because they work just as well and cost a whole lot less.
1896297
I have used both and had the more expensive one first. It did not heat the lotion as well and if you used more than a few pumps it was cold. It quit working about a year after purchase which prompted me to purchase the lower priced model when I replaced. The lower priced one seems to be much better and keeps all the lotion nice and warm. It is easier to clean and overall I like it better. I use mine in my massage therapy practice so it gets a good workout each day. Overall I am happier with the less expensive model.
1166899
There is no difference that I know of, this one has a + on the bottle as well. There is API Stress Coat which helps with the slime coat and is a different product.
971445
I've not tried others. But my mother has. She said this one is weaker than the Tzone she uses on a regular basis. But just feels a sense of wellbeing on this one. Now my 80 yr old grandma feels it is really strong. Where she is sore the next day. Has for the hertz read the description.
1001113
Is there any difference between the energizing and revitalizing face scrubs? They both seem to indicate that they do the same thing and I assume that both products are basically similar. They may even be the same thing with different names.
1875627
I am 64 years old and I have tried both. I prefer the restore and renew as it has made the biggest improvement on wrinkles, especially in the eye area. I use their eye cream once in the morning and again at night.
2142815
I have used both and there appears to be no difference. I will continue to use this product as I said, it does help.
2264594
Can't really tell the difference in the effects. I have only used the Super as it contains 4 times more of the oleander extract which I believe to be the most important ingredient. I like the stuff, face feels great. Have not used long enough to comment on the wrinkle reduction, but face looks and feels smoother.
1059820
I've never used Compare-N-Save. But I can say it doesn't last as long as a pre-emergent as a granular product I've used called "Freehand." However, you need to weed the area before application.