Are they straight leg or room in the thighs?
109694
They are straight legged, but are quite roomy in the thighs. They are really comfortable fitting.
109695
The legs are Straight but the have a zipper at the end to give more space for the shoes. La pierna es recta, pero tienen un zipper al final para darle más espacio al zapato.
109696
They are straight leg but also roomy in the thighs, not as much as baggy pants but enough comfy for movements and I have to say I have big thighs
109697
They are quite roomy. I by no means have small thighs and found these extremely comfy.
109698
They are straight leg, but the thighs do have enough room. However they do not have any stretch which is my biggest complaint. The zipper in the leg is comfortable and not too tight unlike many other convertible pants I have tried.
109699
The silver ridge had some room in the thighs. They were my favorites in terms of comfort. For style I prefer the saturday stretch convertible pants, but those are tight around the zipper. It's not bad when walking, but gets uncomfortable when sitting.
40173
They are sized correctly. If you are an I'm between size I would go down as you want maximum compression. Hope that helps
154491
These run slightly small. If you lean towards a half size, you may want to size up. Plenty of room around the ankle and lower leg. I do not have slim legs, and these fit well with enough room.
1014983
They are straight backed. We have been very pleased with how comfortable they are.
57830
The are flat front not pleaded. I think they are more classic not straight. They give your thighs breathing room, and the do not tapper at the ankles. I'm 46 and not buying anything straight fit. I hope this helps
21433
Yes. They have pockets on each side and a small pocket in back at waist line.
589757
There is a sizing chart. My first one was full leg, I got the short leg the second time.
1020782
So far I have noticed that my thighs are touching which they were not but I've always had hips i feel like the growth is proportional. It would look weird to have big butt and little legs!
116846
Hey, I'm out of town right now, but I ordered size 2, and they fit fine. I'm 5'5", 24" waist and about 35" low hip/bum, 20" upper thighs. Were slightly loose, but not at all sloppy. Hope this helped some.
50904
They run true to size. The legs run up a little higher than I had hoped but the waist still has room.
556725
Not knowing the comparative length of your thighs compared to your lower leg it would be hard to say, but if your thighs are relatively longer you should fit. Just a guess. The length of my upper leg from the crotch to the middle of my knee is about 13 inches if that helps.
29542
I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the... » Read More I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. « Show Less
54594
Hmmm, I dont know what to say... It matters on height and leg length to be honest. I'm 15 and 5'7" and I use the medium and they fit perfectly, not to big or small. So, if you can tell me your height and if you have unusually long legs :P then i can recommend the size perfect for you.
134496
The leg openings are fitting. I have thick thighs and they fit me well. the material moves with you. I am an adventure /hiking person and love these shorts.
424252
They are very big so they would fit thick thighs I have them and have a lot of room. as far as the feet I have had no problem with them
98982
Haven't measured it, but the inseam on the "Pace" shorts is on the short side - probably about 3.5". These are racing and speedwork shorts, so they show a lot of leg. I don't care and wear them for daily training anyway. If you're looking for something like a bathing suit or longer, these are probably not the shorts for you. However, they are super comfortable for running.
122748
They are a very relaxed fit. I would say they are more like snowboarding pants, with a loose fit through the legs. however, they are still comfortable and suitable for skiing or snowboarding.