Looking to get into a DSLR, would this still be an adequate starter camera? Bulk is OK, is the only 6MP outdated and a problem?
1324959
I would have considered it a starter camera possibly 2-3 years ago..but now since the firmware is at it's highest revision the camera is limited to older SD cards up to 4GB, no further. Those are becoming harder to find. I have gone from a D50 to D80 to a D7000 currently. The D80 or D90 would be good choices to learn on. I hope this helps!!
1324960
It's a great starter camera. I bought it for my wife as she had dabbled in photography in the past and wanteed to get back into it. Has been a good camera for us as a hobby and for taking family, senior, wedding portraits, etc.
1324961
The D50 was a wonderful camera in its day, and will still give beautiful photos. I still own mine as a backup camera. However, I would consider something with 12MP. The main problem I have with 6.1MP is cropping... the detail isn't there on a small-window crop. In my opinion the D50 gives a more vibrant image. So follow your budget. The D50 has an internal focus motor so it accepts older and third-party lenses. The view screen is a little smaller and the menu options aren't as great as newer cameras. By today's standards the D50 is obsolete so don't pay too much.
1324962
Nope. The D50 is an amazing camera. I still have mine and use it for high speed photography because unlike 99 percent of cameras it actually has a "digital shutter" meaning it actually just turns on and off quickly by itself at really high speeds instead of curtain syncing so it can be used for high speed flash photography.I'd say if you can get one really cheap go for it and also get a 50 1.8 lens. Great learning setup as it's what I used as a beginner.
1324963
I do not think the 6mp will be a problem. It is a great camera for beginners. It has an internal motor so you will have more flexibility when buying lenses. The D40 and D3000 doesn't have motors so you are limited on auto focusing lenses. The 6mp ok unless you want to make large poster size prints.
1324964
The Nikon D50 would be a perfect starter camera...just don't pay too much for it(150.00 of less). Pair it with the 18-70 lens and you will be able to take outstanding photos. If you like the results, you can always upgrade later. I've had mine for years and use it as a back up, but I love the quality of the pics from the D50.
1708151
Depends on the kid. I don't think a child would have problems with the physical form of the camera, it's not heavy and the controls aren't hard to use. My biggest concerns would be the complexity of the interface and the durability of the screen, so I'm not sure it's the best starter camera. If you get it, be sure to turn digital image stabilization on. It wasn't on by default on mine, and it helps a lot.
597146
The D300 was my first SLR Camera. Before that I was using point and shoots. I would say it is appropriate for a beginner who is learning actively. When I bought this cam I had started taking courses and I evolved rapidly to a serious hobbyist. I would say you shouldn't buy it if you're not planning to learn how to be a better photographer, otherwise, the Canon 40D which is also a medium sized SLR would be much more suited. It has many kinds of automatic modes that you would select. The D300 has only four modes: Manual, Shutter Priority, Aperture Priority and Program mode.Personally I'm glad I ended up choosing the Nikon D300, it's such an amazing camera...I hope this was helpful The D300 was my first SLR Camera. Before that I was using point and shoots. I would say it is appropriate for a beginner who is learning actively. When I bought this cam I had started taking courses and I evolved rapidly to a serious hobbyist. I would say you shouldn't buy it if you're not planning to learn how to be a better photographer, otherwise, the Canon 40D which is also a medium sized SLR would be much more suited. It has many kinds of automatic modes that you would select. The D300 has only four modes: Manual, Shutter Priority, Aperture Priority and Program mode.Personally... » Read More The D300 was my first SLR Camera. Before that I was using point and shoots. I would say it is appropriate for a beginner who is learning actively. When I bought this cam I had started taking courses and I evolved rapidly to a serious hobbyist. I would say you shouldn't buy it if you're not planning to learn how to be a better photographer, otherwise, the Canon 40D which is also a medium sized SLR would be much more suited. It has many kinds of automatic modes that you would select. The D300 has only four modes: Manual, Shutter Priority, Aperture Priority and Program mode.Personally I'm glad I ended up choosing the Nikon D300, it's such an amazing camera...I hope this was helpful « Show Less
1935516
Yes this is a fine camera I got mine around 2010 and it takes great photos 10MP or you can also shoot RAW picts. The video is ok but its no were even near 720P. The camera has a lot of setting that either you can tweak to your liking or you can let the camera decide. Make sure if you are trying to take photos of movement to get a class 10 SDHC card with at least 8GB storage. with that card even on the high setting 10MP I can take 4,999 photos. The camera easily switches from picture to video. Hope this helps.
1816631
This isn't a full-frame camera. It's aps-h, 1.3x crop. And if you're shooting astro photography you should be looking into a Nikon d800 or a 5dmkii. This is a camera with 11-year old sensor technology. I bought one to shoot surfers with here in Hawaii broad daylight and I get noise (by modern standards) past about ISO400-500. This camera is great if you're looking for a cheaper 7d and you don't want video capabilities or a screen you can actually see. Don't get me wrong, it's a great camera, but its age definitely shows. I bought one in perfect shape with 42k actuations for $430 and not 3 months later I bought a 7d for $530. The extra money spent on a more modern camera is well-worth it.
210901
No problem. Just pay mind its a harsh flash. If you're planning on using the camera casually its great, but you might eventually want to go the extra mile for a nicer model for the flash itself. Two cents.
1001746
It's a low level flash The cheapest flash anyone could ever get. But over all the kit is good the d7100 is a awesome I would say this is a good beginners kit I am actually saving up to get a better flash but the external flash is awesome on the d7100 and if anything the cam performs well under low light
2159836
It's pretty good, as a beginner I picked it up pretty fast. All in all I love my new camera :)
999266
Despite my purchase, I'm the wrong guy to be asking. I'm sure it's a good, versatile camera. But I was deluded as to size. I wanted something that would slip in my pocket -- this is too cumbersome to do so. I am neither recommending nor not recommending. Good luck.
356703
I do. The camera is incredible and has helped pushed the limits in tough shooting situations like only a full frame can do. The ONLY 'flaw' has been a dusty sensor in the beginning. Cleaned myself and all is well. In the age of DSLR any serious photographer should be comfortable in cleaning the sensor as it comes with the territory eventually. I love my D600 and dollar for dollar I personally would choose no other body on the current market.
808896
Can't answer because I don't have a DLux6, but I have a DLux 5s. This is a near perfect camera. The photos are amazingly sharp and balance dright out of the camera. You get great pictures without really trying, but if you work at it, they are hard to distinguish between a big SLR. The camera is great for low light and for close ups. It's also small and has a great feel in your hands.
257777
I agree, this camera looks good for someone like me who wants great pictures from a more user-friendly camera than a bulky DSLR. You can compare it to the S6000 on Fuji's website. The few things I noticed was the weight - 7 ounces lighter - and the dual memory card slot that eliminates the need to buy special cards. It also has mechanical image stabilization that was missing from the S6000. Somebody with experience should check it out and repost what they find.
1681729
It is about as good as your are going to get without investing a huge amount of money (8-10k). Might need a monopod too. New D750 or other high performing low light DSLR is also advisable.
1199114
its def. worth the price, i was a bit skeptical in the beginning because all cameras i owned before were from nikon. i bought this one as a gift to my mom(simply because of the good reviews), and she took a lots of great quality pics and videos during our family vacation. quite easy to operate. ps i have an old, similar quality Nikon, and this camera takes way better pictures and have an amazing zoom for such small camera.
815616
The camera is NOT a compact camera but it's not a DSLR either. If you are looking for a camera for your purse or pocket then this is NOT the camera to have. It is not as heavy as a DSLR, but you will definitely feel the difference in weight and size in your purse if you put it in there. If you want a camera that takes fantastic shots at DSLR quality this is a great camera. It also has wifi as you know. I sold mine. Why: The battery runs out sooner than I wanted. I went back and bought a compact Canon for the better than my iPhone quick snap shots. Hope I helped.
1426063
Yes, it's a great camera but don't overpay (no more than $400). You could also look into the canon rebels.
122905
I just bought a 40D and I think it is a great camera. As posted, there is not best choice but I am sure if the extra (few) bucks is not an issue, we should go for the 40D. It is also the latest sensor and I found it to be really good. Took some shots and it is great.