Video vs Flip Ultra: How does the video quality and ease of use on the Canon compare to a Flip?
610989
Dave Kaminski just did a post at http://webvideouniversity.com/podcast addressing your very issue. It might be worth a peek.
59305
David, I posted this question on another site and a person said the only reason they would lean towards the Canon because it has headphone/mic jacks. I, personally, have found that the Canon seems to get better video quality reviews but the downside is that isn't using the default settings. Almost all the reviews says the settings need to tweaked in some fashion. So I am starting to lean towards the Canon.
1508370
I am partial to Canon and am excited to see they are introducing a model in the rugged, waterproof class. I previously used the first generation waterproof Olympus Stylus and after it broke moved to the Pentax Optio W series. It has been a good camera as far as durability, but it just doesn't produce photos like our Canon Powershot SD1000. As far as the post question, I can't wait to see some product reviews/comparisons. Based on my previous experience with the Stylus line, I am ruling out the Olympus. Although right now I am leaning towards the Canon based on previous experience with their products and superior photos. However, the Panasonic offering higher video quality in HD format is enticing.
806647
i actually returned it after couple of days. I went with glidecam. I wasn't too happy with it's performance. As far as camera goes, i think it can handle canon c 100
1170271
VPC-PD2 no question. It's a real (hobbyist) camcorder not another flip video
1542215
I have to tell you the truth, first I have no idea about your flip, very sorry. Second I've used it only once with my camera and from what I remember, it's pretty flexible. Sorry I couldn't be more helpful.
589743
The Flip is easy to use. That said, the screen is on the back so difficult to aim for taking selfies. For playback, one can hook it directly to a TV with the MDMI cable.
344031
They seem to be pretty comparable. I found a couple of reviews... check out dpreview.com (http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canonsx1is/page13.asp) for more details. The thing that turns me off of the Sony is that it takes memory sticks and I believe it saves the videos in a sony format.... Canon seems much more open and standards based.
859736
As a user of the SD750 myself, I find it very easy to use in comparison to the SD1000. A few things you ought to know about the SD750 is that, it is an actual upgrade of the SD600 which by the way was a phenomenon camera. And to me it is quite obvious that the SD1000 is of a lower value compared to the SD750. You should also know that the SD750 has a digital image stabilizer that actually works unlike the SD1000, it takes an amazing shot in the dark. For example, when ever I go clubing, I enjoy taking lots of pictures of subjects without the drunks in the background and this camera does it all for me. Not to forget that it is SDHC capable, so if you are someone who enjoys taking short videos on the go, these camera will do that for you also with an amazing sound amplifyer, all you do is just by a 4GB SD card and you got yourself up to 80mins of video recordings and did I mention that the large lcd screen is scratch resistant? and a longer battery life. I know all these functions and features without even reading the manual nor did I install the driver that comes with it, why you may ask, because it is also idiot proof. It is quite obvious I need to go work for canon and that the 750 is without a doubt a better buy or as most will say, a wiser investment.
2016003
The D3100 is lighter and smaller-but not by much either way. The swivel screen is a big deal; it definitely increases the functionality of the camera, e.g., self-portraits, low and overhead shots, and video. Image quality is a wash. Yes, the D5100 has better dynamic range, but that will only matter if you shoot RAW and post-process. The D3100 is significantly more user friendly for noobies. Its controls are better arranged and better thought out, so it won't be hard to quickly get started. The D5100 has a few more capabilities that advanced beginners and enthusiasts on a budget will appreciate. Bracketing for HDR shooting is the feature that stands out. There are also a few more options in video including the option for an external mic on the D5100. As an enthusiast looking for a small, compact, economical camera to complement my enthusiast-level Canon cameras, I opted for the D5100 instead of one of the Canon Rebel series (I've owned three and finally concluded that the Rebel AF was inadequate for my needs). However, making a recommendation to someone who had never used a DSLR or SLR, and just wants to get better pictures of family and friends, I would unequivocally recommend the D3100. However, for someone who thought that photography might become a serious hobby, the D5100 is the obvious step-up choice to get instead of the D3100. Another consideration is how it feels in your hands. Both cameras are very small for DSLRs. Users with big hands are well-advised to try these cameras before buying. I've heard lots of complaints that these cameras are simply too small to comfortably use.
957979
Thank you for your comment. I found it very helpful. I naturally prefer Canon but really want the wide-angle offered in this Sony camcorder. Canon missed the boat on wide angle in my view.
972729
From a preview I read on another site (camcorderinfo.com) the highest quality output is true 1920x1080 progressive. Anything captured in a lower quality setting is the 1440x1080 resolution which was troublesome for some editing suites. I am waiting for some more professional reviews to be published comparing this one (and it's 120GB sibling) against the Canon HF10 which is getting good reviews. The Canon features a maximum 17Mb/s bitrate vs. the HDR-SR11/12's 16Mb/s maximum bitrate. The Canon is also flash memory vs. HDD but I don't have a strong preference either way.
154001
Thank you. I bought the 2sx230 on 11/11/11 and I noticed outside in the bright sun light it captures movement well well and pretty sharp. Inside not so well. I want very much to learn how to use the ISO and how to make great photos using the manual functions. I bought the canon for its size, I will be traveling which is why I wanted a small camera. The shutter speed seemed to be the fastest. Thanks again these comments are very helpful, I'm really looking forward to getting to know my new camera.
725760
Thanks Jim, What is the advantage of the HF200 over the HF100 camcorder? Is the quality going to be better?
1253031
On the HF200 I have found that the Cinema mode with 24 fps is showing excellet quality and clarity. The video is fantastic. There are a couple of HD settings with FXP 17 Mbps or MXP 24 Mbps. The FXP is great for most scenes and MXP would only allow 3 hrs of video recording on a 32GB memory card. An additional note: AVCHD video recorded in MXP mode cannot be used with the otpional DW-100 DVD Burner by Canon to create DVD discs. You must use FXP mode if planning to use this optional burner.
1884566
I wish I could help you there, I don't do much video recording on my camera. I've never tried to use any programs for video. But usually canon has a software that comes with the camera on the disk that allows for video and picture conversions.
1134717
I am torn between these exact same two camcorders also. Looking forward to your follow-up post!