Incoming EPO president reopens software patent debate
260703
All change, please New head of the European Patent Office (EPO), Alison Brimelow, has signalled her intentions early, calling a public meeting to discuss the policy vacuum left by the rejection of the Directive on Computer Implemented Inventions.â¦
445763
PC Magazine - The issues of patents, indemnification and the potential risk of using open-source software took center stage at the keynote panel of industry leaders at the Gartner Open Source Summit.
104737
The future of the controversial European Union (E.U.) software patent directive was thrown into doubt Wednesday after the Polish government indicated it could no longer support the legislation in its current form.
583594
"It is completely up in the air at the moment"  EU foreign ministers will debate on Monday whether to sign an interim trade agreement with Serbia -- a move seen as boosting pro-European President Boris Tadic ahead of a February 3 presidential run-off. Tadic ... via Reuters UK
124159
The chipmaker's forum for developers gets under way Tuesday, with talk of new tech from CEO Paul Otellini.
168026
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office will re-examine patents covering embryonic stem cell discoveries made by University of Wisconsin researchers.
241535
(InfoWorld) - Consumers in Europe have another group looking out for their digital rights with the opening of a Brussels office by the U.S. nonprofit group the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). The EFF has battled the U.S. government and corporations to protect the rights of consumers and technologists in areas like free speech, data privacy and digital rights management. It has brought or helped to defend cases against the U.S. Department of Justice, Apple, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, AT&T, and others. On Monday it opened an office in Brussels, home of the European Commission and the European Parliament, and said it would play a more active role in shaping European law and advocating on behalf of European citizens. The office was funded partly by Mark Shuttleworth, the South African dot-com billionaire who launched the Ubuntu Linux distribution, and by the Open Society Institute, a U.S. grants foundation chaired by George Soros. Erik Josefsson will be the EFF's European Affairs Coordinator. He was previously the head of the Swedish chapter of the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure, which helped overturn the proposal for a unified patent system in Europe. The EFF didn't say which issues it would pick up in Europe. Areas it could potentially get involved with include the battle under way against Apple to force it to open its digital rights management (DRM) system, so songs bought from its iTunes Store can play on music players other than Apple's iPod. It has already been involved in some European cases. A few years ago it set up a defense fund for the Norwegian teenager Jon Johannsen, known as "DVD Jon," who was accused of creating an illegal program, DeCSS, to watch DVDs on his Linux computer. He was eventually acquitted by a Norwegian court. In the U.S. the group has fought the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, a controversial law that seeks to prevent people from cracking DRM systems to access copyright works, but which critics say has been misused to inhibit innovation and fair use. It also brought aÂ class action suit against Sony BMGÂ over the "rootkit" copy-protection technology used in some of its music CDs, helping U.S. and Canadian customers to get refunds. And it helped defend several bloggers who were sued by Apple for allegedly leaking information about upcoming products to online news sites. Its current cases include a class-action suit against AT&T for wire-tapping on behalf of the U.S. government, and a suit in Florida on behalf of citizens whose votes were not properly registered by e-voting machines.
171642
Conflicts with European law, they say A group of small British businesses has mounted a challenge to changes made by the Intellectual Property Office's (formerly known as the Patent Office) to the scope of the monopoly a patent holder can be granted for a software patent.â¦
127051
It&#39;s time for Europe to reassess its  skepticism towards genetically modified (GMO) foods and trust  scientists who have deemed them safe -- or risk more  international lawsuits, the EU trade chief said on Thursday.
610383
When Matthew Szulik left Red Hat abruptly for family health reasons in December, many people were scratching their heads over the company&#39;s new choice of CEO: a young executive from Delta Airlines, Jim Whitehurst. But Whitehurst&#39;s chief operating officer title at Delta and position outside of the technology industry are misleading; a peek into his past reveals a computer science degree and a passion for open source technology, not to mention a smooth operator who helped bring a struggling airline out of bankruptcy.Still, Whitehurst, 40, has big shoes to fill in replacing Szulik, the man who took a small, unknown company and turned it into a savvy business competitor that made Linux a household name and struck fear in the hearts of much bigger rivals&#160;such as&#160;Microsoft. Today, Red Hat is the leading Linux vendor and is financially sound, but the company is in a pivotal phase of reinventing itself as a broader open source software provider and a multibillion-dollar technology leader that can compete long-term with much larger companies.Whitehurst spoke with IDG News Service this week about the key findings of his first month on the job and where he thinks Red Hat should focus its attention to evolve at a sustainable pace. This is an edited version of that interview.IDGNS: I was surprised to find out that you have a computer science background when I heard you came to Red Hat as COO from Delta Airlines. I didn&#8217;t expect you to be such a techie.Whitehurst: I do have geek cred. For some reason, your reputation is always based on your prior experience. When I was at the airline, people said, &quot;Who is this strategy consultant running an airline?&quot; Now I&#39;m an airline guy running a technology company. I wish I was called an airline guy when I was at the airline!IDGNS: Was this a personal interest in open source that led you to Red Hat? Was Delta a big user of Linux?Whitehurst: Delta certainly uses some REL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) and JBoss, but it&#39;s more of a personal interest. I was hacking around with Slackware, one of the early Linuxes that was out there in the &#39;90s, and an early adopter and user of Fedora all the way through when I got the call for joining Red Hat. It&#39;s always been a passion of mine, so the opportunity to get out there to lead is an extraordinary privilege and honor for me.IDGNS: Red Hat is currently in a great position as leader of the Linux market and has been doing well financially, but the company has been called upon by Wall Street to grow and possibly diversify the business. When you look at the company, what are its biggest challenges right now?Whitehurst: Let me start off by saying I&#39;ve only been here a few weeks. The first month [has basically been] going out on the road with customers, employees, with investors, with analysts, with our partners-slash-competitors and really trying to get a sense of the business, what&#8217;s working well and what&#8217;s not. The good news is, most things are working well -- from the standpoint of being a very healthy business growing rapidly with healthy financials.I think you&#8217;re right there are certainly areas where we can do a better job. First off, I would just say the general organizational focus. We actually do a lot of different things, support a lot of different projects. We have to be careful that we&#8217;re focusing on the right things and putting our investment dollars where they&#8217;ll have the most impact. I&#39;m still going through the details of what we do and what we don&#39;t do, so stay tuned on that.A second area where there&#8217;s still a lot of opportunity for Red Hat would be basically [in] processes and systems, including IT systems and governance, especially for a company that&#39;s grown so rapidly. A lot of those processes and systems and ways of doing business are different for a company like Red Hat that&#39;s [US]$500 million on its way to a multibillion-dollar company than they are for a small company. Some time and attention on basic execution to make sure we have the processes and systems in place to grow, and grow healthily, are another area where I plan to spend a fair amount of time.IDGNS: And what about your experience makes you well-suited to help meet those challenges and diversify Red Hat&#39;s products beyond Linux into more of a full open source software provider?Whitehurst: For starters, I am an operator. I am pretty good at getting a company to focus, and focus on a few things. We certainly did that at Delta and did that well in the turnaround. Obviously, having come from a larger company and having run a larger company, I have a good sense of the processes and systems we need to make sure governance [and] processes work well.About whether we need to diversify or not: People are asking, &quot;Well, should we have bought [open source database company] MySQL?&quot; [Editor&#39;s note: Sun Microsystems said last month it is&#160;buying MySQL for about $1 billion.] We are still a very small-share player in the server OS market and a small-share player in middleware [with JBoss]. If you look at the quality of our technology, it&#39;s the best. We feel very good about that. We still have basic execution to do to reach our full potential in the markets we&#39;re in. So I don&#39;t feel the need to diversify until we nail the product and are fully [satisfied] with our existing products. I&#39;m not sure we want to divert our time and attention to other things.IDGNS: A lot of people have been critical of Red Hat for what it&#8217;s done so far with JBoss, and think success with this is key to proving Red Hat can evolve beyond Linux. How are you going to make that business more successful?Whitehurst: Obviously execution and commercial execution will be big focuses going forward [for JBoss]. We fundamentally changed the JBoss business model from a big consulting/support [business] to our enterprise/.org models that we had with REL [on the enterprise side] and Fedora [on the .org side]. It has, without a doubt, proven to be a very successful model, and one could argue it&#39;s about the only demonstrated successful model of any size with open source. In the same way we have Fedora and REL, we have the .org version of JBoss and the enterprise edition. JBoss had a different business model before, but we think our business model has proven the most successful and the most durable. It&#39;s the right decision. It just takes a while.The good news of that also shows that it&#8217;s not easy to develop a good business model around open source, so it&#39;s a relatively defensible model going forward. We feel very good about where JBoss is. ... We think we can grow twice as fast as the core REL business.Red Hat&#8217;s never been involved in any material way in the application components of the stack. We do provide a full open source stack with the LAMP stack. We will continue to do that, so we&#39;re playing there to some extent. In terms of our focus and where we&#39;ll invest our team and attention and dollars, the [market for the] infrastructure component of software worldwide is close to $100 billion. We&#39;re a $500 million software company. I would argue we&#39;ve barely scratched the surface. I&#39;d much rather we make sure we make progress there than get into the CRM business. Once we&#39;ve achieved our full potential in our core businesses, we can open the aperture. But I want to make sure the company is focused on the potential of our businesses in that core market.IDGNS: Microsoft is coming out with Windows Server 2008 pretty soon. Do you see this as a good opportunity to snag Windows customers who may be thinking of upgrading and instead moving them over to Linux? Is there still competition in this space, or will it always be the Linux camp sticks with Linux, and the Windows camp sticks with Windows?Whitehurst: We&#8217;re seeing a lot of migrations from Microsoft to Linux, from Unix to Linux or even Unix to Microsoft. There&#39;s a big battleground out there. Anytime there is a significant upgrade or change, there is an opportunity for us. Anytime a customer stands back and says, &quot;Let me reassess this&quot; and &quot;Do we want to upgrade?&quot; that&#39;s great for us because our value proposition is much more compelling for our competitors. Whenever there is a reason for customers to reassess, that gives us an opportunity to show our value, so we&#39;ll be out there aggressively this year.IDGNS: Much was made of Microsoft&#39;s interoperability deal with Novell in November 2006. Has that deal hurt Red Hat in any way? Do you even view Novell as a major competitor anymore?Whitehurst: There may be a deal or two out there, but it hasn&#8217;t come up to my level. We really don&#8217;t see them that much in the market. They&#39;re not really a factor. Given our market share and certified ecosystems of partners -- [those] really drive our position.IDGNS: Are you worried about&#160;Microsoft&#39;s patent claims against Linux, which were recently&#160;dismissed again by Linus Torvalds?Whitehurst: We&#8217;ve spent a lot of time looking at that, and we have an assurance program for our customers, so they don&#39;t need to worry. Microsoft for years now has talked about 235 patents [that they own that Linux violates], but they&#8217;ve yet to tell us any of them and we continue to ask, &quot;Show us what they are.&quot; How many times can you keep saying it before you pass on the opportunity to do anything? At first people got concerned, but after years and years and years, you recognize it&#39;s a lot of bark and no bite. We never want to take any claims of intellectual property violations lightly, but those have been around so long with absolutely nothing behind them. After a while, it becomes harder and harder to take those seriously.IDGNS: Where would you like to see Red Hat be in five years?Whitehurst: Again, this company is currently the open source leader. Open source is still really a nascent part of the IT infrastructure in corporate America. As the leader of open source, one of the things we need to do, and should do, is foster and further open source awareness and adoption in worldwide IT. My view of success includes how well Red Hat does that in the future as a multibillion-dollar company.We want to see the continued adoption of open source as key technology across corporate IT. [We&#39;ll] continue to foster communities of use in the developing world where we operate, and communities of use where we remain sure that information and software remains free and unencumbered by proprietary formats. When we do well, we do good. We certainly have aspirations for size and growth and profitability, but we do recognize we have a role in fostering adoption and the benefits that go along with that. The great news is, this is a company in wonderful shape with a fantastic brand and market position and extraordinary, high-quality people. It&#39;s up to us not to squander that opportunity.
86220
Nina Kraft, winner of last month&#39;s Ironman Triathlon World Championship in Hawai&#39;i, acknowledged yesterday that she had used the banned endurance-boosting drug EPO.
117723
But middleware will make it chatty Analysis The debate over who in the Linux camp will next get into bed with Microsoft is back on, after Red Hat's chief executive admitted to holding patent talks.â¦
705476
(InfoWorld) - At a global event once known for long-winded, diplomatic speeches delivered by heads of state-owned telephone companies, Viviane Reding, European Union Commissioner for Information Society and Media, was brief and blunt in her keynote speech Monday at the opening of the Telecom World conference and exhibition in Hong Kong. Speaking to a mixed audience of government officials and corporate executives, Reding said "competition drives growth -- not monopolies." Key to creating a competitive telecom market is, among other things, the development of alternative infrastructure, such as cable and wireless networks, which can compete with the public networks of entrenched incumbents, according to Reding. Regulators can play a big role in this process by supporting the development of competitive networks, she said. IP (Internet Protocol) technology is another tool regulators could use to foster competition. With platform-neutral IP, they could establish a "functional separation" between the "passive network," or underlying infrastructure consisting of cables and components, and the "active network" comprising the many different services that run on top, Reding said. A functional separation could make competition much more effective in a services-oriented environment, but such a separation would have to be done "in a careful way," she warned. Even though GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) was everything but an open global standard when the European Union initially agreed to the need to establish a pan-European mobile phone system, policy makers in Brussels have since acknowledged the need for standards to be established by the market -- and not government. Reding pointed to the current standards battle in Europe over broadcast mobile TV technology. "Several standards are fighting for the pole position," she said. But governments shouldn't decide because they could select the "wrong standard" and "lock " industry into a technology that may be inferior or commercially unattractive. Governments need to minimize regulation in the digital era, including spectrum allocation, Reding said. Many of the entry barriers in the wireless sector that exist today are bureaucratic, not technical, and governments should get rid of them as soon as possible, she said. Wrapping up her speech, Reding had a word of advice for Chinese regulators: they should participate in global telecom standards rather then favoring their own. "We are living in an open world," the Commissioner said. "Government should not be setting standards, but should be providing the legal framework to create free and open competitive standard setting." Reding's remarks mirrored the concerns of European WCDMA (Wideband Code Division Multiple Access) equipment makers that worry about beingÂ locked out of ChinaÂ if the government favors the homegrown TD-SCDMA (Time Division Synchronous Code Division Multiple Access) standard and local suppliers that support it. At present, WCDMA, which dominates Europe and huge chunks of Asia, the U.S.-supported CDMA 2000 and China's self-developed TD-SCDMA are the three potential 3G (third-generation) mobile network technology standards for China. Â ADVERTISEMENTNEW IT SERVICES FROM IBM: EASIER TO BUY AND IMPLEMENTDiscover a simpler, more cost-effective way to get the solutions your company needs to grow more flexible and efficient.
353623
Patent reform, security, Internet access and other topics are expected to gain a higher profile next session.
602584
The software monolith extends an intellectual property plan to all.   Also: U.S. opposes the WTO's online gambling plan & hellip;.  Microsoft will offer a long awaited preview of its search-engine technology & hellip;. and more.
712718
The Football Association announced yesterday that it will introduce testing for erythropoietin (EPO), &quot;in the near future&quot;, indicating a serious desire to address the threat of doping in the game.
701973
SCE&#39;s outspoken president speaks out on the PSP for the first time since the price announcement this week. Sony Computer Entertainment president Ken Kutaragi (shown here at a press event held earlier this