Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: "Living Document" Interpretation Threatens Liberty

Mr. Tribe unfortunately thinks that re-interpretation is a valid substitute for ammendment. Politically correct revisionist history notwithstanding, anything that is supposed to be authoritative (e.g. constitution) must by very definition be interpreted according to the intent of the author, not the desire of the reader. Otherwise, the liberties the document was written to protect are at perpetual risk of being interpreted away at the subjective whim of unaccountable judges. Mr. Tribe would do better to direct his efforts towards changing the actual clauses with which he disagrees rather than discredit the authority of the entire document by twisting and delegitimizing them. Even if one happens to hold the founding fathers in low esteem and reverence (as is fashionable these days to do), society is better served by making desired changes via ammending the text rather than ignoring it.