Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Neither recreational nor instructive

I quite agree with the reviewer from Massachusetts.I bought this book in the hope that I could get enough (indices to the) information necessary to understand Wiles' proof of FLT contirbuted to Annals of Mathematics some ten years ago.The book has simply turned out to be junk for me: it does not provide any enlightenment as to the undestanding of the proof, nor does it offer any recreational delight (supposed? by Poorten himself.) As many reviewers have pointed out, "arrogance" is the exact word to describe the attitude of the authour.I too would like to have the money re-imbursed.The bottom line is, if you would like to understand the proof, do not buy this book but follow the "beaten path": study algebra, algebraic number theory, class field theory, modular forms and elliptic curves. I know this sounds (and is) demanding, but it is not impossible since many good textbooks on each subject have appeared these ten years.