Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Liberalism at its worst

Regardless on your thoughts about man vs the planet and about the best way to preserve both in harmony. This book is nothing more than the basic liberal attempt to blindside the arugment by stating his premise as fact and then basising all future theories on this "fact". But if you are not allowed to dispute the original arugment than all future arugments have to agree, hence no ability to make up your own mind. The author does this by his choice of words such as labeling one group as the "leavers" and the other group as the "takers" and stating that these names carry no meaning other than to identify the groups. This is what liberals do and I for one would like the 2 weeks back I wasted reading this veiled attempt and liberal brainwashing.