Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Lots of gravy, not enough meat

This book was overly dramatic and didn't have a point. As an exercise in investigative journalism, it might have passed the course. The research was probably pretty good, although not perfect, and the explanation of events was exciting, if overblown. As a book, however, it lacks a point. So this kid broke into computers...what should we as computer professionals do? So the internet is insecure...what should we as individuals do? So the FBI took too long to get up to speed on computer crime...what should we as voters do? None of these questions are answered, or even seriously addressed. Publishing this work in book form should have offered the two authors (journalists by trade) a forum to ask and answer the bigger questions instead of just stringing together a bunch of daily-news quality reporting. There is a sort of essay at the end of the book that makes a lame attempt to do this, but it's not worth buying the book for.