Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Basis Of Numbers Is Misleading

In 1962 I started to feed Chou En Lai's people with much needed material and tools from donators here in the USA and many other places on Earth when Chou said to me that fewer than 20 could be found. The author of this book vaguely chooses a much later date and panda number. Even using the vague numbers of the author I see the panda numbers as having increased over 2000%- and that is not looking all over for the pandas as done 50 years ago. As I said in the title of this review the key to the misleading choice of the basis for the change in panda numbers is when and who does the counting. Environmentalists are a poor choice to believe compared to those that actually work with the pandas.