Ballmer touts benefit of Yahoo deal
557121
Microsoft Corp.'s proposed $42 billion purchase of Yahoo Inc. would establish the world's largest software maker as a "strong No. 2 competitor" against online search leader Google Inc., Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said Monday.
300149
In a letter outlining Microsoftâs  hopes to Yahoo C.E.O. Jerry Yang, Microsoft C.E.O. Steven Ballmer followed a storied tradition on Wall Street: the bear hug letter.
569907
InfoWorld - Microsoft has offered to buy Yahoo for around $44.6 billion in cash and shares, to better compete with Google in the market for online services.
185112
Microsoft's potential acquisition of Yahoo has many pitfalls but also some benefits, and such a huge deal will be hard to pull off, analysts say.
659088
Microsoft Corp  said on Monday that its $44.6 billion unsolicited offer for Yahoo Inc  was generous and it expects Yahoo's board and shareholders to agree to the buyout quickly.
258038
Here's the note Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang sent to his troops Monday morning explaining how Microsoft's bid "substantially undervalues Yahoo."
562449
By MICHAEL LIEDTKE  SAN FRANCISCO - Yahoo Inc.'s month-old upgrade to its advertising formula for making money from online search requests so far has done more to lift the Internet powerhouse's morale than its finances, the company's two top executives said Tuesday.
218001
By MICHAEL LIEDTKE SAN FRANCISCO - Just before Google Inc. went public nearly three years ago, Yahoo Inc. Chairman Terry Semel assured a roomful of securities analysts and money managers that his company would remain the Internet's brightest star.
574999
Yahoo's $350 million purchase shows commitment to communications services as  company rethinks its destiny, says exec.
608347
Yahoo Inc. said on Wednesday it  would acquire Rivals.com, a site for fans of college and high  school teams, bolstering the Internet media company&#39;s place as  the top U.S. sports site in audience terms.
638665
Microsoft&#39;s $44.6 billion offer to purchase Yahoo&#160;is a dramatic statement from a company that delayed acknowledging the importance of emerging Web business models for so long, it faced becoming an also-ran in the Web 2.0 economy.But the cultural implications of the move are so tricky that the deal could end up backfiring for both vendors if Microsoft doesn&#39;t take care to learn from its past and use Yahoo to transform its business and&#160;not just help bolster its unproven efforts in online advertising and hosted services.The unprecedented deal, which would put a sizable dent in Microsoft&#39;s wallet, would be the largest purchase ever for the company. If Microsoft is willing to spend that much money, it also has to be willing to change some old ways of thinking to make the most out of the investment, analysts say.To achieve this, analysts caution Microsoft to be careful not to view Yahoo as a one-trick pony, taken onboard only for its user base and infrastructure to bolster Microsoft&#39;s online advertising interests against Google. While this is certainly the primary reason for the deal, to make the most of it, Microsoft has to not only respect the strength of Yahoo&#39;s brand but also be willing to let go of some of its own traditional proprietary interests -- not just on the product side but in its culture as well.Microsoft has never been one to let go of its vision or proprietary interests too easily; when acquiring companies, it usually subsumes the products and services and brands them as its own.While this has worked in the past because Microsoft traditionally has shied away from acquiring big-name or big-ticket items --&#160;last year&#39;s $6 billion aQuantive deal&#160;was a notable exception -- it&#39;s not as simple to do this with a company like Yahoo, analysts said.In the areas of online search and particular services and as an online destination for users, Yahoo is a stronger brand than Microsoft. Microsoft must recognize this and be willing to give up some of its interest in new content and services branded, respectively, under MSN and Windows Live to make the deal successful, said Ned May, director and lead analyst for market research firm Outsell.&quot;The big question is, will Microsoft take this and recognize it for being a stronger property and migrate its efforts there, or will it try to push its own efforts out through Yahoo?&quot; he asked. &quot;Historically, there&#39;s no precedent for it to do anything but use [an acquired company] to get Microsoft&#39;s message out.&quot;Though Microsoft and Yahoo are different types of companies and the union itself makes much more sense, Ron Schmelzer, analyst and managing partner with Zapthink, likened the deal to Time Warner-AOL, in which AOL&#39;s brand was damaged, not enhanced, after all was said and done.But investing as much as the gross domestic product of some countries in one company could inspire Microsoft to &quot;change its stripes&quot; and rethink its own interests, he said.To make the deal a true success, Microsoft also has to prove that it can let go of its entrenched Windows OS and desktop software culture, which had been the anchor keeping Microsoft from moving more quickly against Google and Yahoo in online advertising and services in the first place, Schmelzer said.&quot;The application itself is moving away from the thing that sits captive on your desktop to the thing that&#39;s distributed on the Internet,&quot; he said. &quot;Microsoft has to rid itself of its &#39;80s and &#39;90s perspective -- which was great in the &#39;80s and &#39;90s, but now 80 percent of the value of the computer is not in the computer itself.&quot;Microsoft had been moving in this direction before Friday&#39;s news, but it has been burdened by its need to keep the customers of two of its biggest consumer products -- Windows and Office -- happy, as well as its enormous portfolio of enterprise and business customers. Instead of moving full bore into the Web, Microsoft had adopted a &quot;software plus services&quot; strategy as a nod to its software legacy and inability to move fully to a more services-oriented strategy because of it.Still, some think an entire cultural shift isn&#39;t necessary for Microsoft to make the most out of the deal. David Mitchell Smith, vice president and fellow at Gartner, said Microsoft can leverage Yahoo successfully without changing its usual way of doing things, by keeping the brand and merging the best parts of Yahoo&#39;s Internet business, such as its online content, advertising and search, with its online services efforts.&quot;I would expect to see the Yahoo brand come out of this very, very strong,&quot; he said. In particular, Microsoft has been making moves to drive more video and other multimedia content online through MSN, and that is one area where the company could give up its own identity in favor of Yahoo&#39;s, Smith said.Andrew Brust, chief, new technology for consulting firm twentysix New York, said that the combination of Microsoft&#39;s existing Web technology and the Yahoo brand would be &quot;nicely complementary,&quot; though he acknowledged the risks of such a union. Even so, &quot;risk aversion is not a good Internet strategy,&quot; Brust said. Taking a risk in this area as well as bringing &quot;some truly Internet-focused mindset into the corporate culture&quot; may be just what Microsoft needs.Others likened the deal to another risky one, HP-Compaq, which many feared would be a disaster because of product overlap and cultural differences. That deal eventually proved successful.However, it&#39;s important to keep in mind how much more of a role that culture and the cool factor plays on the Internet than it does in the world of traditional computer hardware, warned Outsell&#39;s May. He said Yahoo users may be put off by the notion of Microsoft as their new daddy and see Google as the lesser of two evils, which would defeat the notion of the Microsoft-Yahoo union in the first place.
361931
Microsoft executives said very little on Friday about the undeniable challenges of integrating the company&#39;s Internet division with Yahoo, largely avoiding the proverbial elephant in the room that could delay or, in some cases, eliminate benefits of the deal.At the heart of the acquisition is Microsoft&#39;s goal of giving its online advertising and online services business a major boost, ending years of business and technology defeats at the hands of common rival Google.Microsoft wants to make sure that as online ad spending doubles to about $80 billion in the next three years, it will be in a much better position to grab a larger piece of the market, specifically in sponsored search, which is the biggest online ad segment and where Google dominates.As CEO Steve Ballmer, President of Platforms &amp; Services Division Kevin Johnson and Chief Software Architect Ray Ozzie said repeatedly during Friday&#39;s news conference, Microsoft wants to swallow Yahoo to accelerate its pace in online advertising. With Yahoo&#39;s online services, engineers, and ad platforms, Microsoft hopes to become a stronger competitor to Google than it is today.That all sounds fine in theory, but Ballmer and his colleagues said little about the energy and know-how they will need to make this proposed $44.6 billion acquisition work, considering that the companies have a significant overlap in online services, markedly different cultures, and an abundance of inflated professional egos at every level.Not to mention that Yahoo these days is far from functioning as a well-oiled machine. Yahoo has been in significant turmoil for more than a year. Seasoned executives who are experts on its business have struggled and largely failed to restore the company&#39;s technical edge and business focus. That&#39;s a mess that Microsoft will inherit and will have to solve in order for the deal to work its expected magic.In short, Microsoft must make sure that, in its quest for scale and speed, it doesn&#39;t end up getting stuck, its wheels spinning, trying to mesh Yahoo with MSN, while Google speeds further ahead. It&#39;s clear that to take advantage of the online ad growth, companies will need to innovate and change quickly, and not be sidetracked by acquisition distractions.Among the many emerging opportunities in online advertising are: the mobile sector, which is expected to go from almost nonexistent to vibrant in the coming years; social Web properties, such as social networks, blogs and social news sites, which haven&#39;t been monetized properly and hold great promise; and video, both in the form of video ads and ads in videos.There were indications during Friday&#39;s news conference that Microsoft may not have taken the time to fully assess the magnitude of the integration complications. Despite Ballmer&#39;s assurances that he personally has thought &quot;long and hard&quot; about the Yahoo acquisition, there is evidently a level of urgency about the move, or else the deal wouldn&#39;t have been an unsolicited offer, as Yahoo has portrayed it.If, as Ballmer indicated, the companies have been in on-and-off talks for about 18 months about a possible acquisition, it&#39;s fair to ask -- as a financial analyst did -- why they couldn&#39;t sit down privately and present, jointly, a more cooked deal. Basically, Ballmer admitted that Google keeps expanding its empire and time is of the essence.&quot;Any large integration process has risks associated with it. We&#39;ve all thought about it. We could have hired [more] engineers, but at the same time the market continues to grow and the leader continues to consolidate positions and there&#39;s nothing quite like putting together two larger sophisticated R&amp;D organizations,&quot; Ballmer said.Along with the inherent opportunity to sell more ads, Nick Patience, managing analyst at The 451 Group, also sees a &quot;potential integration headache&quot; with having to integrate Microsoft&#39;s ad platforms -- AdCenter and aQuantive -- with Yahoo&#39;s. Patience is also skeptical about the possibility of merging search indexes, and believes that the search engines will most likely have to continue to operate independently. Overall, the integration work would represent for Microsoft &quot;a step into the unknown,&quot; particularly since this would be by far the largest acquisition in Microsoft&#39;s history, Patience said.Gartner analyst Allen Weiner also sees potential integration challenges, particularly because he doesn&#39;t think either organization has a powerful leader who can take the reins of the combined entity and lead it into the future. &quot;They need someone like a Steve Jobs or a Bill Gates who has the charisma, vision, technical knowledge, and consumer knowledge to lead,&quot; Weiner said.On paper the acquisition has interesting potential, but it will all come down to how the integration is carried out, Weiner said. &quot;It&#39;s all about the execution,&quot; he said. &quot;The devil is in the details.&quot;Despite numerous acquisitions over the past few years in advertising and Web 2.0 technologies, Yahoo has struggled to jump-start its business, said JupiterResearch analyst Michael Gartenberg. &quot;At the end of the day, it hasn&#39;t all worked out for them,&quot; he said.While Microsoft executives are stressing that a deal with Yahoo would give it the scale to compete with Google, wrapping the two companies&#39; diverse technologies together won&#39;t be simple, Gartenberg said. &quot;In order to get to that scale, you&#39;ve got to be able to fit all those pieces and parts together,&quot; he said.Despite the integration concerns, Microsoft has good processes in place for managing acquisitions of large companies, said Gartner analyst Mike McGuire. However, it will be key for Microsoft to quickly put a senior management team in place as Google will continue to propel ahead as Microsoft sorts out the details. &quot;They are going to have to start showing some traction, or at least a really solid vision for how they will combine the companies ... early on,&quot; McGuire said.Matt Booth, a Kelsey Group analyst, thinks that the integration challenges will be major but predicts that Microsoft will work through them methodically, starting on the back end and linking services in a way that, as much as possible, is transparent to end-users, be they advertisers, publishers, or consumers. For services that are just too difficult to integrate, they will likely be kept separate. The last thing Microsoft wants to do is drive users away, Booth said.In a research note, Citigroup financial analyst Mark Mahaney said he is skeptical that a combined Microsoft-Yahoo would improve its search products enough to affect Google&#39;s position, since they both have been losing search market share and, in his opinion, seeing a decrease in their search innovation.&quot;Given what would surely be immense integration challenges, it&#8217;s hard for us to see how a Microsoft-Yahoo combination would create a greater technology competitor to Google at least for the foreseeable future,&quot; he wrote.&quot;We could see a scenario by which Google would actually gain more market share due to industry uncertainty over the integration of the deal,&quot; Mahaney added.
191819
Yahoo's $350 million purchase shows commitment to communications services as  company redefines its place in the market, says exec.
154717
Lose the tie, SteveO! Analysis The rhetoric surrounding Steve Ballmer's unsolicited $44.6bn offer for Yahoo! will focus on the obvious - the potential market share growth that a Microsoft and Yahoo! tie-up would have against Google.â¦
55675
In a bid to halt Google's growing dominance online, Microsoft has offered to buy struggling Internet giant Yahoo for $44.6 billion, an acquisition that would unite the world's most influential software company with the Web's most-trafficked site.
164623
Yahoo investments aimed at offsetting the company's 2006 greenhouse gases.
501726
'We've been engaged for months' !!!!! Steve Ballmer all but confirmed that Microsoft wanted to buy Yahoo! for scale, branding and audience rather than any technology or products the web media co owns.â¦