How Bad Is Windows Vista's EULA?
177025
Digging into the document yields a few surprises, nasty internet rumors aside. In Monkey Bites.
600476
Microsoft is testing a new feature on its Download Centre website that can lock out pirated copies of Windows. During the test period, users of Download Centre can opt to have the Windows software installed on their PCs validated as genuine.
337538
How far is too far when it comes to the freedom of software? Plus: Palm slipping, Windows sliding.
580322
New antipiracy technology in Windows Vista will shut people out of their PCs if the operating system isn't activated within 30 days after installation.
14749
Microsoft has begun a short-term validation programme aimed at tackling software piracy. Users are invited to have their copies of Windows XP analysed, with the promise that they will be replaced free of charge if found to be counterfeit.
593691
EC probe extended, McAfee puts boot in More bad news for Microsoft's delayed operating system Vista - the European Commission is widening an investigation into whether or not it breaches competition law.â¦
670928
If you're hesitant about making the leap to Windows Vista, expect a hassle trying to find a Windows XP PC on store shelves.
181908
(InfoWorld) - Google's claims thatÂ Microsoft's built-in Vista desktop indexing and search tool violates its antitrust agreementÂ could be difficult to prove even if the software does slow down the performance of Google's competitive Google Desktop offering. As long as a user can run alternative software to Microsoft's Instant Search software, it's unlikely that U.S. federal antitrust officials would consider coming down on the software giant, analysts and users said. Google's claims are far different than the ones posed by Netscape during the browser wars that led to the Department of Justice's antitrust suit in the 1990s, said Rob Helm, research director at Directions on Microsoft. "Microsoft beat Netscape in part by leveraging its relationship with PC manufacturers," he said. "This is a lot subtler." Google seems to be alleging that "if two pieces of software don't play together, then it must be an anticompetitive tactic of Microsoft's," Helm said. "I don't recall any past antitrust cases asserting something so broad," he said. The presence of Microsoft's Vista desktop search could be slowing down Google's product merely as an accident of product design, not because of any malicious intent by Microsoft, Helm said. "Even if Microsoft's software was perfectly written, the way Google interacts with it might be bad, and either company might be at fault," he said. "They could have both done the right things in different ways that might conflict with each other." According to a report in The Wall Street Journal Monday, Google sent a white paper to U.S. federal and state antitrust officials in April to try to convince them that Vista makes it difficult for consumers to use rival desktop search software. In its white paper, Google claims that Vista's search boxes and bars -- available in several places in the OS, including the Start menu and in the Windows Explorer file manager -- work only with Microsoft's search and indexing tool. The company also said it is nearly impossible to turn off Vista's indexing, which means a competitor must add a second indexer that slows down a PC. Google spokesman Ricardo Reyes confirmed the company's charge against Microsoft Monday. Microsoft is disputing Google's charges and said that it has worked closely with federal officials to ensure its Vista OS, released to consumers in January, fosters rather than inhibits competition in the area of desktop search. Users can disable Vista's desktop search service, but the company has not made it simple for them to do so, acknowledged Jack Evans, a Microsoft spokesman. He said this is because the company designed Vista's desktop search specifically "to not affect performance and back off any other programs running" -- including any third-party desktop search software -- in a way that should resolve any claims of anticompetitive behavior, Evans said. Andrew Brust, chief, new technology of consulting firm Twentysix New York, said he used Google's desktop search when it first came out but switched to Microsoft's product when it became available for Windows XP because he preferred it. "Microsoft chose to integrate into Windows, whereas Google decided to be browser-based," he said. "Plus, at least back then, Google installed its own local Web server as part of the product and I really didn't like all that baggage. Microsoft's was just more useful." Brust, who has used Vista in beta form, said integrating desktop search into Vista is "common sense" and suggested that Google's complaints might be sour grapes over Microsoft's own antitrust charges against the search vendor when it unveiled plans toÂ purchase online advertising and marketing powerhouse DoubleClick. Samir Bhavnani, research director for analyst firm Current Analysis West, said that Microsoft's integration of desktop search into Vista was a response to Apple's inclusion of desktop search in their Mac OS, not a move against Google. He said it wouldn't be fair for Google to accuse Microsoft of being anticompetitive without leveling the same charge at Apple. However, Helm contradicted this reasoning and said that Apple was not found in a U.S. court to have a monopoly on PC OSes, while Microsoft was in the DoJ case. "I don't have the impression that Google is worried about Apple," he said.
662461
A Windows Vista feature designed to simplify computing for disabled users has security implications, according to a McAfee researcher.
124435
DRM restrictions may have caused Microsoft's Vista virtualization flip-flop.
611813
A tool has been posted online that can apparently crack Vista's activation process by applying brute force -- and lots of time -- to come up with valid product keys. But the author is now telling users it's wrong to use it.
641565
Updates pushed out last week by Microsoft to Windows Vista users to prep PCs for next month's release of Service Pack 1 have crippled some machines, according to messages posted to the company's support site.
617776
Perhaps the most oft-asked question by consumers with regard to whether they should adopt Windows Vista is whether their six-month-old or older hardware is too obsolete for Vista to make good use of it. This morning, Microsoft released for free download the XP version of its Vista Hardware assessment tool, whose aim is to tell consumers what they may need to upgrade in order to put the best polish on those heavily anticipated exclamations.
108846
A bizarre episode in which Microsoft announced, then rescinded, plans to change EULA restrictions on how consumers can use Vista made for a strange Tuesday for observers, and an unhappy ending for users hoping to use the OS on virtual machines.
184446
Tycho:  I don't know whose fault it is exactly, mine or theirs, but I won't be installing Vista anytime soon.  I would like some crazy shit to happen when I minimize something don't get me wrong.  I want my windows to go Waja-wajow(!) is possible.  But if there's a great reason to "trade horses midstream" or whatever the going metaphor is I haven't discovered it.
714146
According to security researchers, Windows Vista's speech-recognition feature is flawed and hackers could use it to remotely force a PC to execute commands.
538417
(InfoWorld) - The European Commission warned Microsoft again Tuesday that planned security features in the upcoming Windows Vista operating system could run afoul of EU antitrust laws, prompting Microsoft to say that an adverse ruling from European regulators could further delay Vista's ship date. In a statement Tuesday, EU Commission spokesman on competition Jonathan Todd said that the Commission believes that diversity and innovation in the security software market could be threatened if Microsoft doesn't allow reputable third-party security vendors to compete on an equal footing for customers. The statements came in response to questions from journalists who had been briefed by Microsoft, Todd told InfoWorld. Microsoft is reaching out to members of the press to express concern about the EC's stance on Vista security and to explain the reasoning that went into the company's decisions to integrate some security functions in the Vista operating system, according to Stephen Toulouse, of Microsoft's Security Technology Unit. "We're doing what everyone asked us to do and making Vista secure," Toulouse told InfoWorld on Tuesday. "We believe we've set the security foundation higher in Vista than in other operating systems and we don't want to lower that," he said. Microsoft is committed to delivering an EC-compliant operating system, and would abide by requests from the European Commission to remove security features if necessary, Toulouse said. Unraveling security features such as the BitLocker drive encryption, Windows Defender and Windows Security Center from Vista at this late date would be a monumental task, however. "I can't even speculate on how we'd deal with a request like that," Toulouse said, although he didn't rule out delays in the global release of Vista. Todd rejected the idea that the EC would give a "green light" to any particular version of Vista, but said that Microsoft would have to produce a product that complies with EU competition rules, or risk an antitrust ruling from the Commission. "We've made it clear to (Microsoft) for some time that it's up to Microsoft to make products that are fully compliant with EU competition rules, particularly in light of the March 2004 ruling on its abuse of its dominant market position," Todd said. NeelieKroes, the European Commission's competition commissioner, wrote to Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer in March to express concerns about the security features and requesting more information on them, but the company delayed responding to the letter until the end of August, Todd said.Â  Microsoft did a full court press on Tuesday to try to counter the EC's statements about antitrust concerns with Vista's security features, emphasizing the company's work with independent software vendors. Speaking with InfoWorld, Toulouse, until recently program manager for Microsoft's Security Response Center (MSRC), explained the company's reasoning in adopting security features such as Patchguard, a feature on 64-bit versions of Vista that prevents applications from "patching," or modifying the Vista core processing center, or "kernel." Patchguard was necessary to stop unauthorized applications and malicious programs from modifying the Vista kernel to take control of the operating system. Legitimate third party products, however, such as behavioral detection products, also need access to the kernel. Symantec Corp. executives have complained that Microsoft is using its dominance of the operating system market and hard line stance on kernel patching to stifle competition, but Microsoft allows third parties to extend the Vista kernel using signed, kernel-mode drivers, Toulouse said. Microsoft's security products, such as Windows Live OneCare and Forefront, don't get an inside track to Vista features, Toulouse said. "We play by the same rules with our own products," Toulouse said. "Nobody patches the kernel." Toulouse also downplayed the impact of Patchguard, saying that adoption of 64 bit Vista would be slow, given that fewer applications have been written to run on it, and the 32-bit version of Vista runs on new, 64-bit platforms. On other security features, such as the Windows Security Center user interface, Microsoft allows ISVs to use the features or ignore them. The company has also made it easy for competitors to turn off default security features like the Windows Defender anti-spyware product and Vista desktop firewall silently during installation, Toulouse said.Â  Microsoft has made great efforts to give third party vendors such as Symantec access to Vista, such as giving Symantec employees office space at the company's Redmond, Washington, headquarters and access to Vista source code and builds, Toulouse said. The EC isn't opposed to Microsoft improving the security of Vista, but believes that there needs to be diversity in the security market to stimulate innovation, Todd said. The EC is still evaluating the information Microsoft sent in August on the Vista security features and hasn't decided what additional guidance it will give Microsoft. There were similarities between the EC's position on Vista's integrated security features and the Commission's ruling on Microsoft's bundling of the Windows Media Player, Todd said. That dispute resulted in a â¬497 million fine against Microsoft in March 2004 for anti-competitive practices. Todd acknowledged, however, that security features also had a unique status. "There's an extra dimension with security products. If I have a computer without a media player, it's not the end of the world. But a computer without security countermeasures is in deep trouble," Todd said. "Clearly we don't expect Microsoft to sell software that would be vulnerable to security problems," Todd said.