Debian rejects Sender ID
245484
Developers responsible for the Debian Linux distribution announced on Saturday that they will not implement Sender ID due to Microsoft&#39;s insistence on licensing the anti-spam standard.
684473
I'm trying to discover why three out of three of my selected hard-disk recorders refuse to work on my Debian Etch (Demudi) system. Once again I ask myself the relevant questions: Is it me ? Is my computer trying to tell me something ? Is it something I said ? Whatever the reason(s), my reviews of those three programs must remain in limbo until I figure out what's wrong. The applications are all known to run perfectly well on other machines, so I'm sure there's an external problem. When testing new applications one must be prepared with the newest dependencies. CVS sources are often required. Sometimes one must mutter obscure invocations. Alas, I was not sufficiently prepared. Time for a radical shift.
570576
Two prominent open-source software groups have rejected a proposed technology standard backed by Microsoft Corp. that would close a loophole used to send unsolicited commercial ("spam") e-mail, citing unresolved patent and licensing issues with the standard known as Sender ID.
445056
Spamhaus gives black mark to Nic.at Anti-spam organisation Spamhaus has taken the unusual step of putting an entry for Austrian Domain Registrar Nic.at on its Spamhaus Block List (SBL).â¦
638952
VaporStream has released software it claims does not records the senders or receivers of e-mailed messages, providing heightened privacy -- or a workaround for certain compliance regulations.
322407
Users of Red Hat Linux have been targeted by a fraudulent electronic mail advising recipients to install a &quot;security update&quot; containing mailicious code.
118427
Microsoft&#39;s E-mail-filter technology, Sender ID, is unpopular with open-source advocates but popular with spammers, who are using it to bypass other filters.
145253
Blog: E-mail supposedly from the I.R.S. hides a malicious attached file.
136154
SEPTEMBER 14, 2004 (IDG NEWS SERVICE) - An antispam technology proposed by Microsoft Corp. as a standard way of identifying the senders of e-mail messages suffered a blow last week when a group within the
43910
Blog: A Cisco engineer behind the promising new DomainKeys Identified Mail standard warns it isn't immune to exploitation by cybercriminals, but is instead more like "a peephole in the door."
207913
p2pnet.net News:- The plan being promoted largely by Microsoft, AOL, Yahoo and Earthlink to get Sender-ID accepted as a standard is losing credibility.
202255
OK, we had an extended breather from our last look at BIND's zone file pri.example.org. It's time to finish up and get a sense of what these records mean. To go off-topic a little, recently, I had the task of setting up two OpenLDAP servers and putting together a test environment for a project with several developers and several applications including some LAMP applications. Without a working knowledge of DNS, the project would have gone amuck.
39088
Exclusive A CD lock-in tech that only annoys P2P traders?
292161
Ziff Davis - Sender ID's license is making it impossible for open-source programmers to use it in their e-mail applications.
284947
The Debian Linux group will not deploy the Sender ID anti-spam standard, because Microsoft&#39;s license terms do not fit within its free-software guidelines.
6384
We have a few domains hosted on Network Solutions.  For one reason or another we were in a hurry and just used NetSol as our registrar.  BIG mistake!  They are one *pathetic* organization!  They are a DNS company.  That's what they DO!  Their DNS admin only allows 10 IPs. Of course they don't tell you this when you signup.  You only find out that the UI doesn't allow for additional IPs until try to add them.  To add insult to injury when you try to move AWAY from NetSol by changing your primary and secondary they drop your IP configuration immediately.  You're just out of luck if there are clients which have cached your primary and secondary DNS servers.  Now of course the solution would be  ...
498993
But warns it's a dummy installer with no update code