Security in focus at Black Hat
94786
Computer security pros descend on Washington, D.C., confab to talk risks, hacks and digital self-defense.
452393
It is no secret that enterprise networks are increasingly under attack from a variety of sources that are difficult to thwart. To address the problem, many are turning to outside security providers, which is driving  the rapid evolution of new safeguarding technologies, according to  research conducted by the Yankee Group.
450958
Chip maker National Semiconductor Inc. is rolling out hardware devices designed to make desktop and laptop PCs more secure. The Santa Clara, Calif.
640724
IT managers were urged by security experts to develop careful policies about how employee-owned devices are used in the workplace.
239509
Software maintains security on laptops when they're outside the network.
348139
SEPTEMBER 30, 2004  - Linux vendor Red Hat Inc. is adding security and authentication tools from Netscape Security Solutions to its software arsenal through a deal with America Online Inc.
679573
The importance these days of protecting your business from security threats is clear. But how to do it well often remains a vexing problem. Major IT vendors have faced this challenge like everyone else -- but with a twist. As providers of security technology and IT systems vulnerable to threats, they've had to stay a step ahead of everyone else. That's why CIOs of technology stalwarts IBM and Intel and security technology provider Symantec have taken on security management as one of their key functions. All three companies have shared their lessons learned with InfoWorld.These CIOs have had to do more than take on the usual responsibility for driving their respective companies' efforts to defend their infrastructure, employees, and corporate reputations from any fallout related to data breaches or compliance violations. They've also had to be the in-house beta testers for a generation of new technologies their organizations hope to sell to customers. This balancing act demands more of their time and energy now than at any other point in their careers, all of the executives said.Security affects all of it "When I look at the risks here at Symantec, I know that we have to maintain a multilayered approach to protecting our IT assets: our ERP data, intellectual property, customer data, and personnel data. Managing the risk around all of that is a significant responsibility for me and my team," said David Thompson, CIO at Symantec."We have multiple large pools of information that are critical to our organization, and we're seeing more of that data move further toward the boundaries, toward the end points," he said. "My job is getting more data into the hands of our business units, but that creates a lot of risk in terms of where it goes, who has access to it, and what they are using it for, along with the risk of it being exposed."Even Thompson, who ranks his ability to "eat Symantec's own cooking" -- or use all of its security and compliance technologies -- as a huge advantage compared to CIOs working in other firms, admits that trying to keep up with all of the threats and regulations, as well as all the new products, is an effort that can become all-consuming.The key to staying ahead of the attacks and laws, while not spending too much of his time focused on security, is delegating to a strong team of experts and prioritizing which projects to tackle based on their criticality to Symantec's business. "As a business leader and IT executive, if you take the view of trying to fix everything, you'll never sleep a wink. You have to assess risks, and just as we'll never be able to completely secure our borders in the United States, you have to prioritize efforts to reduce risk as much as possible," Thompson said. "CIOs themselves must have a team that can help carry a good portion of the load so that they can stay focused on business relationships, clearing roadblocks, and being the public face of that team."Among the most critical roles that any CIO or technology executive must play in aiding the efforts of their security staff is to drive high-level assessments of risk and figure out how their companies must strategize to complete projects that address the most significant threats and compliance regulations, Thompson contended. The most effective strategy, he noted, is to determine which projects most readily address specific threats or government requirements and focus on them, he said. Otherwise, a broad-brush approach to security will lead to unnecessary complexity and eat up all of your time. Thompson also noted that even with the latest security technology available to him, the security strategy is more important than just having good security tools.At IBM, CIO Mark Hennessy also stressed the importance of delegating to his team of security experts and of conducting near-constant risk assessment. But even with that delegation, security remains a top focus for him, he said. "The world is changing, and there are a lot of new realities around security to address. Fostering stronger security across the board is a core tenet, as it helps to bring more value to everything we do," he said. "We want to make our employees more comfortable and more productive, and drive greater success for the clients we serve, so it's something we constantly need to remain focused on," he added.The security-vs.-complexity challenge Malcolm Harkins, general manager of Intel's Information Risk and Security unit, works directly with the chip giant's CIO Douglas Busch on issues of internal operational security and compliance. Harkins said that one of the biggest challenges that organizations such as Intel face is the process of improving security in the face of rapidly advancing IT complexity.On top of that, ongoing efforts to lower the total cost of securing a company the size of Intel -- while keeping up with emerging threats and regulations -- is driving the firm to seek greater standardization in some areas, and to integrate larger groups of technologies in others. "We currently have over 40 individual security software and hardware providers that we are doing business with, and that's a lot of different pieces to have to integrate," Harkins said. "It's almost crazy from an IT standpoint, so we want to employ greater levels of standardization to help us with issues of consistency; we'll always have a very heterogeneous environment, but we really need a more consistent set of tools. The more standardization you have, the easier it is to make things more secure."One of the most crucial steps any company can take in terms of improving its security is driving understanding of the attacks and laws across their highest executive ranks and ensuring that leaders who become involved in matters of security maintain realistic goals and objectives, Harkins said.But that does not mean being heavy-handed in terms of the security levels demand, he noted. C-level executives who take an extremely conservative approach and desire to aggressively lock down all their IT systems may in fact do more harm than good, he said. "Some companies believe that by severely limiting the use of technologies that pose risks, they are improving their defenses, but the truth is they may just be creating a false sense of security," Harkins said."In reality, they are limiting the ability of their business to operate effectively and are increasing risk by creating barriers and policies that can't be enforced practically," he said. In IT, "you have to work with [C-suite] to change their approach from one that is focused on responding to fears to one that is focused on key controls that solve real problems. You have to have executive buy-in, but by taking the wider approach of considering legal, compliance, and security issues together, you will end up with stronger protection, lower costs, and less complexity."
463385
(InfoWorld) - Secure card maker HID Corp. is objecting to a demonstration of a hacking tool at this week's Black Hat Federal security conference in Washington, D.C. that could make it easy to clone a wide range of so-called "proximity" door access cards. HID has sent a letter to IOActive, a security consulting firm, accusing Chris Paget, IOActive's director of research and development, of possible patent infringement over a planned presentation, "RFID for beginners," on Wednesday, a move that could lead to legal action should the talk go forward, according to Jeff Moss, founder and director of Black Hat. IOActive will hold a press conference Tuesday at 9:00AM to discuss the issue, according to Joshua Pennell, IOActive's CEO told InfoWorld. Paget's talk will address widespread security issues with the implementation of RFID in proximity cards that are sold by HID and other companies and that are widely used for building access. His RFID cloner was on display at the recent RSA Security Conference in San Francisco, where he demonstrated for InfoWorld how the device could be used to steal access codes from HID brand proximity cards, store them, then use the stolen codes to fool a HID card reader. Paget's presentation at Black Hat Federal will go deeper, providing schematics and source code that attendees could use to create their own cloning device, and discussing vulnerable implementations of RFID technology in a wide variety of devices, Paget told InfoWorld at RSA earlier this month. "Hopefully I'll be able to give people some information about RFID and get some pressure on vendors to fix these lousy RFID implementations," Paget said. "As it stands, I can walk up to someone on the street or maybe stand next to them in an elevator, grab their card ID and get into the building," he said. So far, Black Hat organizers have not been contacted or asked to cancel Paget's presentation, but lawyers representing Black Hat, which was purchased by CMP, are ready should that happen, Moss said. "We're prepared for the worst," Moss said. The incident between HID and IOActive recalls a 2005 imbroglio between researcher Michael Lynn and Cisco Systems over a presentation of a flaw in Cisco's IOS at a Black Hat event in Las Vegas. In that incident, Cisco attorneys demanded that Lynn's presentation be torn out of the printed conference proceedings and that Lynn be blocked from giving his talk. Lynn ultimately resigned his position at Internet Security Systems Inc. (ISS) and gave the talk anyway, spawning lawsuits and even an FBI investigation of him. Lynn now works as a researcher at Cisco competitor, Juniper Networks. Whereas Lynn's hack of IOS was considered novel, however, the IOActive demonstration of RFID vulnerabilities is largely a rehash of known issues, intended more as an introduction, Moss said. "They've known about this for years and years," Moss said. Kathleen Carroll, a spokeswoman for HID's Government Relations group acknowledged that a letter was sent to IOActive but that it did not mention patent infringement. She said that the company has long been aware that its proximity cards are vulnerable to hacking but does not believe that the cards are as vulnerable as Paget suggests. "For someone to be able to surreptitiously read a card, they'd have to get within two or three inches and get into the same plane as the card," Carroll said. HID is also concerned that Paget's demonstration will popularize the vulnerabilities in its proximity cards and endanger its many customers. "These systems are installed all over the place. It's not just HID, but lots of companies, and there hasn't been a problem. Now we've got a person who's saying let's get publicity for our company and show everyone how to do it, and it puts everyone at risk. Where's the sense of responsibility?" Carroll said. According to Moss, HID has charged Paget with patent infringement over his presentation, but has not laid out any particular remedies or threatened actions, making it difficult to ascertain what the company might do -- if anything -- to block the presentation. Security problems with implementations of RFID are well known and have been publicized before. In 2005, security consultant Jonathan Westhues detailed attacks against implanted VeriChip RFID chips. More recently, in January, Westhues posted detailed code and schematics for an RFID hacking device that can act as a reader, eavesdrop on RFID transactions between reader and a tag, analyze the signal received over the air, or impersonate a tag.Â  In 2005, Avi Rubin and other researchers at Johns Hopkins also sounded the alarm about weak security in RFID implementations by hacking technology from Texas Instruments that is used in late model car ignition systems and electronic payment systems, as well. All that attention hasn't sparked much change at companies like HID, which makes fifteen different types of proximity cards in their Prox Products and Indala Prox Products lines, all of which are believed to be vulnerable to cloning, according to Paget. "Some of these cards have been around for 15 years and were developed when there was no awareness of the problem," Carroll said. Asked why HID hasn't addressed the issue in more recent proximity card systems, after knowledge of RFID threats became common, Carroll said that doing so would cause "major upheaval" among customers.Â  Inertia is a more likely cause, said Dan Kaminsky, director of penetration testing at IOActive. "They didn't want to change to a more secure implementation because of backwards compatibility issues, and they had a lot of sites that use these cards, and HID has stuff to sell them," Kaminsky said. Paget's hack was no feat of engineering wizardry, Kaminsky said. "It took a month -- and he wasn't even working on it full time." The problem is that RFID technology, although good for inventory tracking as a replacement for barcodes, is not well suited for security, Kaminsky said. "The technology is very convenient, but don't interpret the convenience as security," Kaminsky said. "At the end of the day, many companies are essentially using barcode technology to control access to their facilities. I'd posit that perhaps there are more secure technologies out there." HID recommends that customers who are concerned about cloning upgrade to one of HID's smart card products, which do encrypt transmissions between card and reader and are more difficult to hack, Carroll said. HID also recommends that companies that use the cards train their employees to look for suspicious activity that might indicate that someone is trying to clone or spoof access cards. As for Paget's presentation, Moss expressed frustration over HID's actions, especially given the widespread attention to RFID security holes. "It's just so frustrating from a security standpoint. Now anytime someone wants to talk about anything, they need a team of lawyers. Even when it's about commonly understood problems," Moss said. For now, Moss said Black Hat is supporting Paget and his presentation -- even if last minute changes are needed to satisfy HID, Moss said.
50530
com September 22, 2004, 4:00 PM PT. Most IT Managers won&#39;t question the importance of security, but this priority has been sliding between the third and fourth most important focus for companies.
146912
A new airport security system relies on human judgment
292352
In a story for the Associated Press this afternoon, one of the directors of Microsoft's Windows Client Product Planning team is quoted as saying that a Black Hat security conference demonstration last August scared Microsoft to the point where the company seriously considered removing virtualization capability from Vista entirely.
747317
We offer some simple but important ways to ensure security of your Mac OS X server infrastructure.
359275
This pilot fish is in charge of computing facility operations and he takes security seriously, changing policies to require regular password changes. But he knows that, for some people, that's not enough.
285131
A security organization has suggested police use key-logging software to track communications between terrorists.
246704
The security threats against business-technology systems continue to multiply. Not only do malicious worms and viruses such as Blaster and Bagle continue to wreak havoc, but security pros
667075
The fast-growing mobile security provider gets the CAPS' community's attention.
647678
Given a sharp nudge from federal and state mandates, the security focus has shifted from intruders and malware to data protection and the insider threat â and the likes of Vontu, Reconnex, Oakley Networks, and PortAuthority are meeting the challenge.