Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Gould can't have it both ways

I think that fundamentalists are wrong, but at least they are more consistent than Gould: if evolution is true (in science), then it is also true in ethics and politics. If evolution is wrong, then it is wrong as well in ethics as well as in science, as fundamentalists rightly say. Gould wants evolution to be true in science but not in ethics: he can't have it both ways, double truth is nonsense. Dawkins is right: evolution is true in science, which entails that materialism is true and thus religion has no say in ethics and politics, but instead evolutionary / racial ideas should then be applied in those fields. In this respect Duke's My Awakening is an important contribution, although unclear about wordviews (is it possible to find a politics/ethics that is acceptable to materialism and religion?)