Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Did give it a chance and this book Sucks

It sucks honestly it just does because if you have read this book you will realize there is nothing in the book. No substance. Nothing real. Only supposition. No facts. This book is just maybe this and maybe that. Why would Scott sue for this book to be stopped from being published? Why there is nothing in it, no new information, no big Scott secrets. So it leads me to believe this was a ploy to get us to buy the book. Resonable Doubt...where is the doubt? There is no new evidence. Even as far as an appeal goes, appeals aren't based on evidence not presented. Appeals are usually based on what happened in the courtroom already not new information. I'm mad that I spent my hard earn money on this. But now I will be reading Catherine Crier's book. That what I want, facts, evidence, and the truth about Scott Peterson.