Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Many problems with his references

Mr. Ginenthal gave us a lot of evidences, why Velikovsky is right and Cral sagan and his followers must be wrong. But he made some serious mistakes. Maybe he should read his references again. Sometimes he takes them out of context completely. Others were contradicting his thesis, but nevertheless he takes them to suport his ideas.Just for example the deep-earthquakes. G. is quoting Frohlich, Scientific American Vol.260, pp.48 as evidence for deep crustal quakes. But he does not even mention the explanation, Frohlich gave for these quakes. There are many more examples. I expected much more facts, but this book seems not to be scientific to me.