Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: Shallow pseudoscience

If you're looking for a thoroughly researched, well documentedwork on possible "living dinosaurs" or other prehistoric creatures, this is not it. Sad to say, Hovind's approach is very unscholarly. Many of his stories and sensational claims have been disputed even by fellow creationists. For example, he touts an alleged "plesiosaur" carcass that was by all evidenec a decayed basking shark (see "Plesiosaur or Shark", http://paleo.cc/paluxy/plesios.htm). I hope that most readers (including young oones, whom the book evidently targets) have enough science background and analytical skills to spot the lack of substance and rigor in Hovind's assertions, and do not spread his unfounded claims to others.