Instruct: Classify Amazon reviews into positive or negative sentiment
Query: And one star is generous ...

Whatever you think of the chief justice as a jurist, you should not mistake him for a historian. Simply put, the chief justice is ignorant of scholarship on this election, a prisoner of old stereotypes foisted upon him by whatever research assistant sought to placate his views (do you really think the cheif justice went to the sources?). Scholars will be interested in this book insofar as it might shed some light into the chief justice's own views on the disputed election of 2000, but no one should mistake this volume for a reliable work of historical scholarship.