united-kingdom shareholders
Can a company refuse service to a share holder?
<p>Assume a large public company.
Would the director, or majority share holders of a company be able to legally refuse service to a share holder (on non protected-class grounds)? Would the quantity of shares owned have any difference?</p>

<p>I'm asking in regards to UK law, but would be interested to hear if it's any different in the states.</p>

<p>This is from a Canadian point of view, but the rules regarding how corporations run is generally pretty standard. I took a few classes in corporate governance, but I'm working mostly from memory, so hopefully most of the information is accurate!</p>

<p>A corporation is its own entity, separate from any shareholders, and it can make whatever policies it wants. Unless you are an officer or on the board of directors, your participation in the company usually will be limited to <a href="https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cd-dgc.nsf/eng/cs06644.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">voting in shareholders' meetings and receiving dividends.</a> Refusal of service is a policy matter, so the fact that you are a shareholder (or anyone else, for that matter!) should be irrelevant. In fact, you might be denied service <em>because</em> you're an officer due to <a href="https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cd-dgc.nsf/eng/cs06643.html#toc-02" rel="nofollow noreferrer">conflicts of interest.</a></p>

<p>If the company was unincorporated, you may have more rights, but you'd probably be subject to some sort of agreement.</p>
