employment massachusetts
Is blacklisting allowed after I have put my notice in and acquired a new job elsewhere?
<p>I am a Massachusetts citizen and I am also a disabled vet.
I work at a large company as a programmer/developer, and I have decided to put my 2 week notice in after many frustrations and overall unhappiness.</p>
<p>All of my bosses tried to keep me by offering more money and less work load etc (I declined). They even offered to let me work on other development teams etc. I am still on good terms with all of my bosses and had no problems getting references for a new job at a different company.</p>
<p>There is one person that I work with that threatened to call the new employer and tell them not to hire me (we do not get along all that well).</p>
<p>I read that blacklisting is illegal in Massachusetts. Is it illegal for this fellow employee to call the new company and tell them not to hire me? Does this count as blacklisting?</p>
<p>I have already signed all of the paperwork at the new company and I am all set to start in a couple of weeks. I would be pretty upset if I were to lose the opportunity (especially where all of my bosses have given good references).</p>

<p>The grain of truth is what you've read is that <a href="https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXXI/Chapter149/Section19" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149 § 19</a> says</p>
<blockquote>
<p>No person shall, by intimidation or force, prevent or seek to prevent
a person from entering into or continuing in the employment of any
person</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is referenced in a compendium of state laws loosely subsumed under the notion of &quot;blacklisting&quot;. In Arkansas, this would be
writing, printing, publishing, or circulating false statements in order to get someone fired or prevent someone from obtaining employment; in Indiana it is using any means to prevent a discharged employee from obtaining employment. The Massachusetts law only prevents use of intimidation or force to prevent a person from getting employed. In other words, &quot;blacklisting&quot; is not the same thing in all jurisdictions.</p>

<blockquote>
<p>Is it illegal for this fellow employee to call the new company and
tell them not to hire me? Does this count as blacklisting?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As user6726 points out in another answer, Massachusetts does have a blacklisting prohibition, but the facts you mention probably don't qualify.</p>
<p>A truthful statement of facts and opinions, even unsolicited, is not unlawful (and probably protected under the First Amendment). A false statement of facts could be actionable as defamation, although such cases are very hard to prove in this fact pattern.</p>
<p>You could also consider a lawsuit against a co-employee who calls your new employer causing you to lose the job for tortious interference with contract or tortious interference with prospective business advantage, but again, under the First Amendment, truthful statements of fact and opinion would probably be privileged against legal liability.</p>
<p><strong>Practical Considerations</strong></p>
<p>You have no duty to make it easy for the fellow employee to call, however. You don't have to tell him when you start, who you will be working for, or who the relevant contact people are. You could even lie to or otherwise mislead your former co-worker about one detail or another to interfere with your co-worker's ability to do so without facing any realistic exposure to liability (since the co-worker wouldn't rely on anything you said and it wouldn't be material to the co-worker).</p>
<p>If you think that the co-workers is very likely to call anyway, you might want to give likely recipients of the call a heads up providing some pre-emptive context and defense for yourself.</p>
<p>Positive recommendations from your bosses will undermine a co-worker's call if one is made and can probably be explained away. At this point, your new employer is probably committed to hiring you and not likely to revisit the decision absent a really serious allegation, and your proof of damages if false statements are made in a defamation case would be much stronger than in a typical case where an offer simply isn't made as a result of the other person's action.</p>
