restaurants
What terms surround a restaurant order?
<p>What law in involved in restaurant orders? If I go into a restaurant and order hundreds of dollars of food, then leave before it arrives, I would imagine there is some recourse that the proprietor could take. However, if I order a single item and it doesn't show up for over an hour, despite me inquiring about it's status, would I be compelled to pay?</p>

<p>In placing an order (for anything, not just in a restaurant) and in the supplier accepting it then a legally binding verbal contract has been created. There are terms that come into being implicitly: some come from statute law and some from common law.</p>

<p>For example, in most jurisdictions there will be either a common law or specific statute that requires the product to be of merchantable quality and fit for the purpose the customer explicitly or implicitly made known to the vendor. In a restaurant, this means that the food must be presented in a way that enables you to eat it and it must be fit for human consumption.</p>

<p>It also means that, in the absence of a time for delivery being specified, that the meal must be delivered within a reasonable time. Reasonable has a specific legal meaning and is an objective test: what an ordinary, reasonable and prudent person would expect in the specific circumstances.</p>

<p>It is clear that a reasonable time varies with the circumstances. Reasonable in McDonalds is different from reasonable in a 3 Michelin star restaurant and also different from the same McDonald's when it is obvious to the customer that they are currently insanely busy.</p>

<p>If the supplier does not supply the goods and services within a reasonable time then they have breached a term of the contract. The customer has several options: </p>

<ul>
<li>repudiate the contract and sue for damages if this is a breach of a condition of the contract (a condition is a term that is fundamental to the contract; late delivery of food probably isn't a condition),</li>
<li>repudiate the contract and sue for damages if this is a major breach of a term of the contract (late delivery probably is),</li>
<li>sue for damages if this is an intermediate breach of a term or a breach of a warranty.</li>
</ul>

<p>Enough generalities, for your specific queries:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>What law in involved in restaurant orders?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Contract law, consumer protection law, health and safety law, business law, food hygiene laws, tax laws etc. etc.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>If I go into a restaurant and order hundreds of dollars of food, then leave before it arrives, I would imagine there is some recourse that the proprietor could take.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Sure, there is a contract, you breached it, the restaurant can sue for damages. In addition, they could make a complaint to the police that you have acted fraudulently by ordering food you never intended to pay for.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>However, if I order a single item and it doesn't show up for over an hour, despite me inquiring about it's status, would I be compelled to pay?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>It depends on if an hour is a reasonable time or not. By inquiring you have demonstrated that you don't believe that it is but you may not be "an ordinary, reasonable and prudent person". If the breach is actual and egregious enough then you probably have the right to repudiate the contract; that means the contract is at an end and neither of you have any further obligations under it including an obligation to pay.</p>

<p>That said, you would be on surer ground if you attempted to renegotiate the contract to make time a condition. "Look, if the meal is not here in 15 minutes, I'm leaving"; if the restaurateur accepts this renegotiation by, for example, saying "I'm terribly sorry, we will sort it out" then your position is much clearer.</p>
