united-states driving
Can I legally record a video when driving and talking to the camera?
<p>Can I legally record a video when driving and talking to the camera?</p>

<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVVG99ZOywM" rel="nofollow noreferrer">E.g.</a>:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/SVIaq.gif" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/SVIaq.gif" alt="Driver talking to a camera"></a></p>

<hr>

<p>Some clarifications following comments the question received:</p>

<p>It seems like this might run afoul of laws against distracted driving.</p>

<p>I'm unsure whether laws pertaining to hands-free phone use would also apply to the a driver talking to a hands-free video recorder. E.g. in Arkansas, all cell phone use, including hands-free, is illegal in school or highway work zones. (<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/246574/cell_phone_driving_bans_state_by_state_where_you_break_the_law.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.pcworld.com/article/246574/cell_phone_driving_bans_state_by_state_where_you_break_the_law.html</a> ; <a href="http://handsfreeinfo.com/arkansas-cell-phone-laws-legislation/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://handsfreeinfo.com/arkansas-cell-phone-laws-legislation/</a>)</p>

<p>I am only interested in the case where the driver is talking "to" the camera, meaning that the first intent of the driver is that whatever they say is recorded by the camera.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Are you only interested in the situation where the camera is in front of the driver? What about the situation where the camera is in the back seat, held by another person, but the driver still does intend that whatever they say is recorded by that camera. Is that situation within the scope of this question? – </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Yes, I am also interested in that situation.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>You might want to add "over 18" and "fully licensed" to the conditions, because even hand-free cell usage by drivers under 18 is illegal is some states (Colorado), or with instructional permit (Washington). – user6726 1 min ago</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Let's assume the driver is fully licensed and over 18.</p>

<hr>

<p>I am mostly interested in the following locations:</p>

<ul>
<li>California, United States</li>
<li>Illinois, United States</li>
<li>Massachusetts, United States</li>
<li>New York, United States</li>
<li>Paris, France</li>
<li>Seoul, South Korea</li>
</ul>

<h1>California</h1>

<p>There is no general "distracted driving" statute in the <a href="http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codesTOCSelected.xhtml?tocCode=VEH&amp;tocTitle=+Vehicle+Code+-+VEH" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Vehicle Code</a>.</p>

<p>There are specific prohibitions against cell phone use and texting (<a href="http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=VEH&amp;division=11.&amp;title=&amp;part=&amp;chapter=12.&amp;article=1." rel="nofollow noreferrer">23123-23125</a>). It allows for hands-free talking, so merely talking with the intent that your voice is recorded seems to not be prohibited.</p>

<p><a href="http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=VEH&amp;sectionNum=23103." rel="nofollow noreferrer">23103</a> defines "reckless driving" as driving a vehicle "upon a highway in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property".</p>

<h1>Illinois</h1>

<p>The <a href="http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs5.asp?ActID=1815&amp;ChapterID=49" rel="nofollow noreferrer">vehicle code of Illinois</a> is similar to California's in this regard (there is no general "distracted driving" statute, there are prohibitions against cell phone use and texting, allows for hands-free talking, and there is a reckless driving crime for "willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property").</p>

<h1>Other jurisdictions</h1>

<p>I could go on, but I hope I have given you a template for how to research this question in other jurisdictions.</p>

<h1>Mere presense of the camera</h1>

<p>The mere presense of a driver-directed camera seems to not be a problem, based on safety programs by insurance companies (for example, <a href="https://web.amfam.com/about-us/news-room/archives/archives.asp?article=2007_0301" rel="nofollow noreferrer">American Family Insurance</a>) that include a camera that captures a clear view of the driver. (This supports an inference that a driver-directed camera alone isn't in violation of any driving laws, at least in Indiana, Minnesota and Wisconsin).</p>
