trial murder court
Hypothetical Trial and Conviction
<p>This question deals with how a hypothetical crime would be tried.</p>

<p>Hypothetical situation: The police find two people who have been locked in a room for the past 6 hours. In the room with them is a dead body. Murder! For the sake of simplicity, they somehow know that no one came in or out of the room during those six hours, an eye witness perhaps, but they do know that 3 people went into the room, and only 2 were able to walk out. Survivor A says survivor B was the murderer, and vice versa. All the evidence the police have neither fully incriminates one nor exonerates the other. As they have figured it, there's a 60% chance person A did it and a 40% chance person B did it.</p>

<p>How would this case be tried? There's not enough evidence to make a solid case against one, and all the police have is a hunch. And since America's court system processes one case at a time, these two suspects would be tried separately and would likely both be acquitted as there's simply not enough evidence to convict one. So how would this be tried?</p>

<p>Why do you think this is a hypothetical case? The facts almost exactly match <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/2016/1207.html?stem=0&amp;synonyms=0&amp;query=title(rogerson%20)" rel="nofollow">R v  Rogerson ; R v McNamara (No 57) [2016] NSWSC 1207 (2 September 2016)</a> - 3 men enter a storage unit, 2 men and one dead body leave. Each of the men claims the other committed the murder - the <a href="http://www.odpp.nsw.gov.au/" rel="nofollow">DPP</a> charged both, they were tried together, the jury convicted both and they both received life sentences.</p>

<p>For the more general hypothetical: people can be tried together if that serves the interests of justice - defendants can apply to the court for separate trials but that is not always granted (and this may serve as grounds for an appeal ... or not). There is plenty of evidence of a murder, one (at least) of the two people is a murderer - prosecutors would charge both, present the evidence and let the jury decide which, if any, were guilty.</p>
