rental-property landlord covid-19
Future resident, not prospective resident, schedules walkthrough of my apartment, is this legal?
<p>Today my landlord informed me that </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>that <strong>next year’s resident</strong> has scheduled an appointment to tour the
  apartment for Thursday May 28th, 2020 at 12:00pm</p>
</blockquote>

<p>emphasis added by me. </p>

<p>Here is the quote from my lease:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>ENTRY BY LANDLORD. Landlord or its agents may enter the Premises in an
  emergency or to perform repairs, maintenance, code inspections,
  appraisals, insurance inspections, or for other purposes reasonably
  related to the operation of the building and to show the Premises for
  sale or lease. Except for entry during an actual or apparent
  emergency, all entries shall be made during reasonable hours; and
  Landlord shall make reasonable efforts to inform Tenants of its
  intention to enter and shall attempt to establish a mutually
  acceptable time.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>My residence is in Michigan. 
 This <a href="https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/1977/does-a-landlord-have-to-tell-you-the-reason-for-entering-your-apartment">stack exchange post</a> lists the requirements for entry. I interpret this case, however, as not a prospective tenant but a confirmed tenant i.e. they are already legally bound, unless they break the lease, and are no longer a prospective tenant. </p>

<p>Finally, this is also during the COVID-19 lockdown so I have no where to go during this time. The landlord did inform me that they would wear facemasks while entering the apartment but I just don't feel safe having strangers enter my apartment for no good reason. </p>

<p>Therefore, can I reasonably refuse them entry if they have already "sold/leased" the apartment?</p>

<p>Michigan statutory law surrounding landlord-tenant relations on this point is sparse, and instead the state relies on the common law question of the tenant's right of "quiet enjoyment" of the premises and specifically protection against unreasonable entry by a landlord. (Your municipality may have laws, so you could fill in that information). So the judge / jury would have to decide whether it is unreasonable for a landlord to enter, for this purpose. Given a reasonable purpose (which this is) and reasonable notice (which you have), it's not looking too hopeful for you.</p>

<p>You are trying to read the clause saying "or for other purposes reasonably related to the operation of the building and to show the Premises for sale or lease" as meaning "may only show the Premises for sale of lease to a prospective, non-committed buyer / lessee". That is, you're hoping for a "strict construction" interpretation where a landlord can enter only if there is a compelling reason to do so, whereas the common law and the lease make this a matter of <em>reasonable</em> entry.</p>

<p>The covid argument does change the equation quite a bit: it is <em>reasonable</em> for you to deny the landlord access in lieu of a compelling reason to enter. One question is whether such a showing of the unit is in violation of <a href="https://www.michigan.gov/whitmer/0,9309,7-387-90499_90705-526894--,00.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">gubernatorial orders</a> (assuming that the order is itself legal). On the face of it, this does not seem to be an allowed action. It would be illegal for the three of you to be in the same apartment (not a single household), and it would be illegal for you to leave your apartment. The proposed action is not necessary to sustain or protect live, and the exceptions in section 7 don't clearly apply. However, it would also be a violation of the order to show an occupied dwelling for rent or sale, so it would be unreasonable to take the order too literally. The "current order" changes now and then, and <a href="https://www.michigan.gov/whitmer/0,9309,7-387-90499_90705-529860--,00.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this</a> seems to be the most recent version which says mostly what the month-old order said, with the addition of county-specific restrictions.</p>

<p>This is a sufficiently complex matter that you should lawyer up.</p>
