united-states president pardon prosecution
Can the President of the United States pardon proactively?
<p>President Trump's administration has just formally started the transition process. He is now officially a lame-duck President. It is common for outgoing Presidents to grant pardons in this last phase of their presidency, while they still have the power to do so; Clinton is one of the more infamous examples.</p>
<p>The question which occurred to me: Can a President shield people not only from punishment but even from investigation and trial for federal crimes by <em>granting a pardon proactively</em> (a &quot;prospective pardon&quot;) before any prosecution, let alone indictment, trial, sentence or punishment?</p>

<p><strong>Yes.</strong></p>
<p>The precedent is President Gerald Ford's pardon of his predecessor Richard Nixon in <a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg2502.pdf" rel="noreferrer">proclamation 4311</a> before any possible prosecution had started.
The pardon was granted specifically to prevent the disturbance of &quot;the tranquility to which the nation has
been restored&quot; by &quot;the <em>prospects</em> of bringing to trial a former President of the United States&quot; (emphasis mine).</p>
<p>It is noteworthy though that a pardon can be rejected by the recipient, and that there may be good reason to
do so, because accepting one is an admission of guilt.<sup>1</sup> In the words of the Supreme Court
(<a href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/236/79/" rel="noreferrer">Burdick v. United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915)</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>There are substantial differences between legislative immunity and a pardon;
the latter carries an <strong>imputation of guilt</strong> and acceptance of a confession
of it [...].</p>
</blockquote>
<p>(Again, emphasis mine.)</p>
<p>Proactively pardoning large swathes of current and former government officials, family members and other people connected to the Trump administration would therefore be a double-edged sword: It surely may save a lot of the money and headache coming with being the target of an (even unsuccessful!) investigation; but it may also amount to admitting that the Trump administration was essentially  a criminal organization.</p>
<hr />
<p><sub><sup>1 </sup> As always, things are a bit less clear-cut when one takes a closer look. Because I googled &quot;prospective pardon&quot; after the correct remark by JBentley I stumbled upon the entirely relevant and eminently readable Congressional Research Service reports on pardons. The first one is a <a href="https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/pardons.pdf" rel="noreferrer">&quot;pardons FAQ&quot;</a>, the second one is a more thorough <a href="https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44571.pdf" rel="noreferrer">legal exploration</a> of what pardons actually do. The bottom line is that the Supreme Court and Federal Courts have edged away from a 19th century opinion (Ex parte Garland, 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 333, 380-81 (1866)) which viewed a pardon as an all-encompassing expungement. Newer decisions (prominently, Burdick v. United States, 236 U.S. 79, 86 (1915) which I quoted) don't.</sub></p>

<p><strong>Questionable and Unsettled</strong></p>
<p>First, I am not a lawyer, nor a constitutional scholar. but Ford's pardon of Nixon was never tested in court so there is no precedent here. Some would like to claim that the pardon was valid, but until there is a test, no one can really say.</p>
<p>The reason that it was never tested was that people were relieved to see Nixon go at the time and they (we) were happy to &quot;move on&quot;.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, it set us down a path in which presidents think they have absolute immunity for anything they do while in office, which is a pretty dangerous idea.</p>
<p>I suspect that if Trump tries to issue such pardons, that they will be tested, and then we will get some legal (constitutional) clarity on the issue.</p>
<p>Philosophically, of course, it is a ridiculous idea.</p>

<p>The Constitution is purposefully vague. If it's not prohibited it's permitted... There is nothing in Article II, Section 2 that prohibits proactive pardons. The President's pardon power is limited only by the requirements that the offense be against the United States (so not a state conviction) and that the President cannot pardon impeachment.</p>
<p>Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution which states that the President &quot;shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment&quot;. The U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted this language to include the power to grant pardons, conditional pardons, commutations of sentence, conditional commutations of sentence, remissions of fines and forfeitures, respites, and amnesties.</p>
