copyright intellectual-property licensing trademark
Can the word &quot;Cola&quot; be used for commercial purposes?
<p>I want to start doing some media stuff on YouTube etc and would like to have the word &quot;Cola&quot; in my name (e.g. names like ColaFinder, ColaCabin, StaleCola etc.). Now I am trying to figure out whether the word &quot;Cola&quot; is subject to any IP laws/is trademarked etc. Unfortunately googling for it ALWAYS returns &quot;can I use coke&quot;, and not just &quot;cola&quot;.</p>
<p>I'm not looking for any legally binding counsel - I am aware of the limitations of this site. Just trying to get some inputs on this as I struggle to find info online.</p>
<p>FWIW my research has uncovered that there is a plant called cola: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cola_(plant)" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cola_(plant)</a> , so I figure it can not be trademarked on it's own, one can only trademark a specific combination?</p>

<blockquote>
<p>Can the word &quot;Cola&quot; be used for commercial purposes?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It depends on what you want to do with it, but most uses would be permissible.  &quot;Cola&quot; is, as you note, a generic term, comparable to &quot;trout&quot; or &quot;sugar&quot; or &quot;beer.&quot;</p>
<p>Still, generic words <em>may be subject to trademark protection.</em>  Even &quot;coca&quot; <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coca" rel="noreferrer">is a generic word</a>.  Such protection is, furthermore, not exclusive; trademark protection is more subtle and complex than most people realize.</p>
<p>There might be a company called &quot;Cola&quot; that operates guided outdoor activities, but that wouldn't necessarily prevent an unrelated company of the same name from pursuing the same business in another jurisdiction.  Similarly, it might not prevent a company that repairs household appliances <em>in the same jurisdiction</em> from calling itself &quot;Cola.&quot;  For example, in the US, you can buy &quot;Dove&quot; personal care products and &quot;Dove&quot; chocolate; they are sold under distinct trademarks.</p>
<p>The central criterion is confusion: trademark protection primarily prevents others from confusing consumers about the source of goods or services.  Even if a word or phrase is unambiguously a protected trademark, there are still allowable uses, most notably to designate the product, service, or company associated with the trademark.  For example, if someone wants to tell a story about a bottle of Coca Cola (or even to claim &quot;our product is better than Coca Cola&quot;), the owner of the Coca Cola trademark cannot use trademark protection to prevent them from using the phrase &quot;Coca Cola&quot; in the story (or to make the claim).</p>
<p>For a specific opinion about a specific use of a specific trademark, you should engage a qualified lawyer with experience in trademark law.</p>
