software
If a company has agreed to add my software to their catalog, are they obliged to add it within a certain time?
<p>My software product was invited to be part of a catalog of a software company (July 2020). Once it is available in this catalog, I will get paid royalties if people use my software.</p>
<p>To be included, I needed to make adjustments and create promotion material. This was tested and accepted by the company (August 2020).</p>
<p>At that point I was informed that my software was <em>expected</em> to be added in the second week of October 2020. The big gap until launch was a little disappointing, the <em>expected</em> was already a bit suspicious.</p>
<p>In the week when my product was expected to be added I asked three times at which date it will be added, after which I was informed that the tentative launch date of my product was pushed back by a month, without giving any reason or justification. This costs me an additional month of revenue, while I had to make quite an investment to make my product ready for their catalog.</p>
<p>I asked the company for a reason for the delay, and if I could get compensated for it, but I didn't get any response. Since they again call it a tentative launch date, I fear that they will pull the same trick on me next month..</p>
<p>There hasn't been any promise that my product will be added within a certain time span, but they also didn't mention that it could take months before my product is added to their catalog. At the same time, other products seem to be added all the time. From a legal point of view, could I claim that my product must be added asap? And is it reasonable to ask for compensation for the missed revenue due to pushing back the launch?</p>

<blockquote>
<p>could I claim that my product must be added asap? And is it reasonable to ask for compensation for the missed revenue due to pushing back the launch?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately, no. Your description reflects that you consciously treated <em>as sufficient</em> the limited knowledge you had at the formation of the contract. See <a href="http://www.oneclubofjusticides.com/p/restatement-second-contracts.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Restatement (Second) of Contracts</a> at §154(b).</p>
<p>There is no indication that (1) <em>at the formation of the contract</em> the company committed to a more specific timing, or (2) you would have declined the invitation had you known <em>at the formation of the contract</em> that the company would keep postponing the inclusion of your product in the way you describe. You were given the <em>expected</em> date only after you performed your duties pursuant to the contract, which defeats the notion that the company's timing was any relevant to your decision of entering the contract.</p>
<p>The only way you could prevail is by proving that the company breached the <em>covenant of good faith and fair dealing</em> that is implied in all contracts. See <em>Restatement at §205</em>. Other than that, the lack of contract provisions to protect your interests give the company significant discretion.</p>

<h2>What does the contract say?</h2>
<p>If there is a term in the contract about the timeliness of appearing in the catalog, are they in breach?</p>
<p>If there isn’t such a term, then there is an implied term that obligations will be done in a reasonable time. What’s reasonable depends on the circumstances.</p>
<p>If they are in breach, what does the contract say the consequences are? If they wrote the contract, it’s highly likely they limited their liability. They are entitled to do this because you are not forced to contract with them.</p>
