licensing
CC-BY-NC-ND same as CC-BY-ND-NC?
<p>When looking at Wikimedia, they say they would forbid certain licenses.
<a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing#Well-known_licenses" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing#Well-known_licenses</a></p>

<p><strong>They list the <em>CC-BY-NC-ND</em> and the <em>CC-BY-ND-NC</em> licenses seperately.</strong>
Why ? Is there a difference ?</p>

<p>There isn't a meaningful difference; they just renamed it for version 2.0.  Comparing CC-BY-ND-NC 1.0 and CC-BY-NC-ND 2.0 side-by-side, one can easily see that their scope is the same--there is some rewording, but that rewording is common to all CC-1.0 vs. CC-2.0 licenses, and not indicative of any change in the fundamental scope or purpose of CC-BY-ND-NC vs. CC-BY-NC-ND.</p>
