united-states contract-law terms-of-service
Would what happened in South Park (human centipede) be legal?
<p>There's an episode of South Park where buried in the terms and agreement of iTunes, you agreed that Apple could forcibly make you into a human centipede. See: <a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/ky9bQ.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/ky9bQ.jpg" alt="South Park human centipede"></a></p>

<p>In the real world could this happen? They <em>did</em> agree to the terms and conditions which <em>did</em> include that. </p>

<p>In the real world, the contract could not be enforced, as being <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unconscionability" rel="noreferrer">unconscionable</a>. See <a href="http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/350/445/74531/" rel="noreferrer">Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company</a>, 350 F.2d 445. This, from the ruling, seems particularly applicable to TOS conditions:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Did each party to the contract, considering his obvious education or
  lack of it, have a reasonable opportunity to understand the terms of
  the contract, or were the important terms hidden in a maze of fine
  print and minimized by deceptive sales practices</p>
</blockquote>
