tax-law legal-terms definition bangladesh
What does this law-excerpt mean?
<p>I need to know what...</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Tax means the income tax payable under this Ordinance and includes any additional tax, excess profit tax, penalty, interest, fee or other charges leviable or payable under this Ordinance</p>
</blockquote>
<p>...means in terms of reference and congent excerpt since I am going to use it in income tax court?</p>
<p>What does it mean as in the the left or right diagram(set/venn diagram) of the attached image- left diagram or the right one?</p>
<ol>
<li>Left diagram: &quot;tax&quot; and &quot;income tax&quot; are same entity.</li>
<li>Right diagram: &quot;tax&quot; and &quot;income tax&quot; are different entity where &quot;tax&quot; contains &quot;income tax&quot; along with others.</li>
</ol>
<p>** I want to prove in court that the right side diagram is the true meaning of section 2(62)- is it possible?**</p>
<p>N.B. I am referring to section 2(62) of this tax law <a href="http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-672.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-672.html</a></p>
<p><a href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/XE0h6.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/XE0h6.png" alt="diagram" /></a></p>

<p>You’ll need to check with a tax professional regarding statutory interpretations of the quote, so this answer is not intended to help with your court case. This answer just deals with the quote as a piece of conversational English.</p>
<p>The plain English sense is that although “tax” admits to a wider interpretation ordinarily (your #2), the word is constrained in the given context to just income tax, together with other things that one might not consider to be taxes (close to your #1).</p>
<p>Unconstrained, “tax” includes consumption taxes, wealth taxes, income taxes and so on. It can be argued that penalties and interest etc are not taxes in the normal sense of the word.</p>
<p>However, within a specific context, it can be more convenient to define the term more narrowly while adding a bunch of related concepts that are included by metonymy.</p>

<blockquote>
<p>What does it mean as in the the left or right diagram(set/venn diagram) of the attached image- left diagram or the right one?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The diagram in the left is a more accurate, although incomplete, representation. That being said, the difference between both diagrams is immaterial because some of the statutory definitions involved are circular, redundant, and imprecise.</p>
<p>The statutory definition of &quot;income&quot; &quot;<em>includes (a) any income [...] from whatever source derived</em>&quot;. As such, salary constitutes income, yet it does not seem <em>explicitly</em> associated to any of the listed items (&quot;<em>additional tax, excess profit tax, [...]</em>&quot;).</p>
<p>The reason for saying that the difference is not material is that taxation of <em>salary</em> might be conceptualized as belonging to &quot;<em>additional tax</em>&quot; or &quot;<em>fee or other charges leviable or payable under this Ordinance</em>&quot;. From that standpoint, it is irrelevant whether &quot;tax&quot; and &quot;income tax&quot; are taken as synonyms or &quot;income tax&quot; is to taken as a subset of &quot;tax&quot;.</p>
<p>Maybe if you elaborate on the argument(s) you intend to advance in court and/or why you think the difference is material it will be possible to address any remaining confusion.</p>

<p>This is paragraph (62) of section 2 (Definitions, part of Chapter I) of the tax ordinance , linked in the question. It seems to define &quot;tax&quot; as equivalent to &quot;:income tax&quot;, and to say that it includes various specific assessments and charges, as well as the tax directly on income.  These various charges seem to be specified in Chapter IV (sections 16 through 19E). Section 2(62) simply means tht the word &quot;tax&quot; can be used to refer to the total of these various charges, in this law, for simplicity.</p>
<p>This seems to correspond better to your left-hand diagram.</p>
<p>This definition alone does not indicate what a person does or does not have to pay.</p>
<p>I must agree that it would be wise to consult a professional knowledgeable about this law, before undertaking a legal action in which sizable sums might be at stake. Such a professional might be a lawyer, or a tax accountant, or have some other title.</p>

<p>The ordinance is defining the term &quot;tax&quot; for the narrow purpose of the ordinance itself, which is more narrow the the general definition of the word tax in most respects (since it doesn't include non-ordinance imposes taxes), but broader than the word tax is other respects (since it includes interests and penalties and fees and the like). The terms &quot;additional tax&quot;, and &quot;excess profit tax&quot; are defined terms in the ordinance and basically amount to penalties owed in addition to the ordinary &quot;income tax&quot; which is the primary kind of tax owed under the ordinance.</p>
<p>This definition means that as used in the ordinance, the term &quot;tax&quot; means all tax related amounts of money owed as a consequence of this particular ordinance, but no tax related amounts owed as a consequence of any other law.</p>
<p>There are other taxes in Bangladesh, for example, value added taxes and property taxes and fuel taxes and customs duties, that are excluded from the definition of tax as used in this ordinance.</p>
<p>This is done for drafting convenience, so that what is included and excluded in the concept defined as &quot;tax&quot; in the ordinance doesn't have to be reiterated every time the concept is used.</p>
<p>The diagram on the right is closer to the mark than the diagram on the left, since the definition includes &quot;income tax&quot; as well as other amounts within the definition of &quot;tax&quot;. But it is still flawed because it doesn't include all of the other things that could plausibly be called taxes that are outside the circle and that are not included in this definition, such as taxes imposed by different laws. In equation form:</p>
<p>Tax = any income tax payable under this Ordinance + any additional tax under this Ordinance + any excess profit tax under this Ordinance + any penalty under this Ordinance + any interest under this Ordinance + any fee under this Ordinance + any other charges under this Ordinance.</p>
<p>Thus, &quot;tax&quot; and &quot;income tax&quot; are different things, where &quot;tax&quot; contains &quot;income tax&quot; along with others.</p>
<p>Another subtly of the definition is that only includes taxes and charges described in the ordinance that are &quot;leviable or payable&quot;, which excludes tax obligations which are accrued but not yet payable.</p>
<p>For example, suppose that your 2020 income taxes were due on May 15, 2021, and you are in disputed with tax officials. As used in the ordinance, the term &quot;taxes&quot; includes your taxes from the 2020 tax year and all prior tax years for which the statute of limitations on collection of those taxes has not expired. But it does not include taxes that will be due in the future for the year 2021 on income that you have already earned in 2021, since those taxes aren't payable yet.</p>
