england-and-wales vexatious-litigants
Is there a practical way to see the actual rulings/reasons/considerations that resulted in the litigation bars in effect against vexatious litigants?
<p>There is a register of bans available at <a href="https://www.gov.uk/guidance/vexatious-litigants" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.gov.uk/guidance/vexatious-litigants</a>, but it is just the barest list of names. Where can one find any more details on each of these cases?</p>

<p><a href="/questions/tagged/canada" class="post-tag" title="show questions tagged &#39;canada&#39;" aria-label="show questions tagged &#39;canada&#39;" rel="tag" aria-labelledby="tag-canada-tooltip-container">canada</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Where can one find any more details on each of these cases?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The orders will be on file at the court and, unless sealed, would be available for public viewing. You can also search online databases for terms such as &quot;vexatious litigant&quot; or the name of the person for the written reasons.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Is it practical...</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is asking for an opinion. All I can say is that I have done it via both methods.</p>

<p>Yes. The definition of a vexatious litigant is one who <em>habitually</em> uses lawsuits for improper purposes.  As such, there will be court records of all these lawsuits which led to this determination.  You simply search the court records for those suits.</p>
<p>The government is not going to <em>summarize the reason</em>, because that would them creating editorial content about the litigant which is deleterious to their reputation. Which puts the litigant in a very bad, and basically unfair position.  <em>Their hands are tied, they can't very well sue for defamation without getting permission of the very same government making the satatement!</em></p>
<p>It's bad form to be unfair to people you have barred for being unfair, as it undercuts your own claim of their unfairness.</p>
