contract-law employment canada labor-law british-columbia
Can an employer charge employee/contractor a processing fee for payment?
<p>I had worked for a company (whether as an employee or contractor is disputed). They would e-transfer me payments and take a small amount off to cover the cost of e-transfer. I told them I never agreed to this. They said it was in my contract and it also said so on the website we did our work from.</p>

<p>Can an employer deduct from a payment, the cost to actually do the payment? Does it matter if it was agreed to or not? Does simply stating something on a website count as an agreement? I actually never signed the contract as it was never really discussed and it just popped up on the website and I closed it. However I've heard cases where a person implicitly agrees to a contract by attending work.</p>

<p>If they aren't allowed to do this, do I have any recourse for such a small amount of money that isn't worth starting a law suit over? </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Can an employer charge employee/contractor a processing fee for payment?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>No. The matter depends on whether the person qualifies as <em>employee</em> for purposes of the British Columbia <a href="http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/00_96113_01" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Employment Standards Act</a>. Your description suggests that you meet criterion (b) of the definition of <em>employee</em> insofar as you are (i.e., if you are) "<em>a person an employer allows, directly or indirectly, to perform work normally performed by an employee</em>". See <a href="http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/00_96113_01#section1" rel="nofollow noreferrer">section 1(1)</a> of the Act.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/00_96113_01#section21" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Section 21(1)</a> prohibits an employer to "<em>directly or indirectly, withhold, deduct or require payment of all or part of an employee's wages for any purpose</em>", and item (2) prohibits the employer to "<em>require an employee to pay any of the employer's business costs except as permitted by the regulations</em>". There is no indication that the alleged business cost of e-transfers would be one such exception.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>do I have any recourse for such a small amount of money that isn't worth starting a law suit over?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>You have the option to file a complaint in "<em>an office of the Employment Standards Branch</em>". See <a href="http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/00_96113_01#section74" rel="nofollow noreferrer">sections 74 <em>et seq</em></a> for further details.</p>

<p>You are not specifying the amount of the e-transfer that is being deducted from your compensation. The smaller the amount(s) at issue, the more important it will be for your complaint to persuasively explain how it is not "<em>frivolous, vexatious or trivial</em>". See <a href="http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/00_96113_01#section76" rel="nofollow noreferrer">section 76(c)</a>.</p>

<p>Directing the employer's attention to the aforementioned statutory prohibition <em>prior to filing a complaint</em> tends to disprove allegations of vexation. That is because you are giving the employer an opportunity to mend its conduct and avert the proceedings that otherwise would take place. That being said, a very occasional cost of few cents is very likely to lead to a conclusion of vexation or bad faith regardless of your preliminary steps.</p>

<p>In most other contexts, though, it is in your best interest to stay aware of the obligations that are being presented/proposed to you so that your actions do not constitute an acceptance of terms &amp; conditions you would rather reject. Not all contracts come in the form of a written document signed by the parties.</p>
