a that theft from Jews is praiseworthy and noble if it is done to help "Aryans." 39 Ian Garden, The Third Reich's Celluloid War: Propaganda in Nazi Feature Films, Documentaries, and Television (Gloucestershire, UK: The History Press, 2012), p. 74. Reason Papers Vol. 38, no. 1 145 Considering that to a large degree the Nazis funded their Wehrmacht by assets seized from Jews, down to the gold in the teeth of Jews killed in the extermination camps, this message was very much a Nazi one. This movie was in fact powerfully effective in promoting the ideas and emotions the Nazis wanted to arouse against the Jews. The film is selling three feelings about the out-group Jews, which would increase tolerance of a total genocidal war against them: difference, disgust, and danger. Let us take these in order, and see which scenes in the film fit each category. By "difference" I mean elaborating and reinforcing the false stereotype that Jews look, talk, and think differently from "Aryan" Germans. Numerous scenes highlight the alleged difference of Jews (from other Germans). A few examples include: the scene of Ipelmeyer in the restaurant, odd looking, peculiarly dressed, and ordering caviar; the scene where Bertram tells Ipelmeyer (in effect) that Ipelmeyer's appearance is obviously "Jewish"; the size of the Ipelmeyer house and its ornate furnishings; the scenes showing Ipelmeyer's wife as different in her physical appearance and attire; the scenes showing various members of the Ipelmeyer household speaking German with Yiddish words mixed in; the scenes where Ipelmeyer disregards his wife's infidelity and those that accentuate his own; the scene where he caresses not his wife's hand, but her jewelry; and the scenes in which Ipelmeyer and Samuel refer to ordinary Germans as "Goyim." By "disgust" I mean emphasizing that not only are Jews different, but that their differences are all for the worse. After all, you can view other people as having customs that are different from your own, but still regard them as benign or even charmi