door, “she seemed to wake up at that point and then

immediately pass[ed] back out.” He patted her on the back, and eventually she woke up.

He asked her several times to exit the vehicle, but she did not comply. After asking her

several times if she had been drinking, Callaway answered affirmatively. When she got

out of the vehicle, he asked her how much she had to drink. She said, “[s]everal” and

stated that she had been drinking red wine. When he searched her for weapons, “she

placed her arms out at her side” and said, “[A]irplane--or airport.” When he asked her what

she was doing, she said, “[T]his is what you do at the airport.” When Officer Robin asked

her to do some field-sobriety tests, she refused and told him she wanted a lawyer. Officer

Robin testified that Callaway had “bloodshot” eyes, “slurred speech,” and the smell of

                                             2
alcohol on her breath. She told him she had come from Martini Park and that she had

“pulled into the 7-Eleven parking lot because she realized she was too drunk to drive, and

to sleep it off.” A half-empty bottle of wine was found in her vehicle. At trial, when asked

whether appellant was intoxicated, Officer Robin stated “my opinion was that she was

intoxicated. She was not able to operate a motor vehicle safely.”

       On direct examination, defense counsel asked Callaway whether she remembered

telling Officer Robin that she was intoxicated. Callaway replied “yes, I do.”

                                      II. JURY ARGUMENT

       By her first and second issues, Callaway contends the trial court erred by overruling

her objection to a remark made by the State during closing argument, and that the failure

to sustain the objection deprived her of the right to confront her accusers under the

Confrontation Clause and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We will

address both issues together.

A. Standard of Review

       “‘It is the duty of trial counsel to