 need 
for testing the model.  Steve Hotte, CIO for ETS, would co-ordinate the 
in-house installation for us.  At some point, it will be helpful to get Steve 
in contact with the appropriate MarketPoint IT rep.

Assuming that you get acceptable clarification of these issues, Dale should 
probably send to us a modified licensing agreement for review. 

Let me know what I should do next.

JNG

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 12/13/99 05:15 
PM ---------------------------


Janine Migden
12/13/99 03:57 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D 
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, 
Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES, Lynnette 
Barnes/HOU/EES@EES, Susan.R.Lewis@enron.com
cc: Thomas S Reichelderfer/DUB/EES@EES, Barbara A Hueter/DUB/EES@EES, Lara 
Leibman/HOU/EES@EES 
Subject: West Virginia Settlement

Thom and I have just completed negotiations in West Virginia involving APS, 
AEP and other stakeholders.
The settlement, being filed today is a compromise on all the issues and is 
the result of negotiations.  Enron was the only marketer involved in the 
process.  While we weighed in all the issues, there are a number of items 
that but for our persistence would not have been included in the final 
agreement.  These items include the following:

1.  Native load language
2.  Competitive metering and billing for industrial and large commercials as 
of day one, with other customers following no later than within the next four 
years.
3.  Addition of competitive bidding for default service at end of 5 years.
4.  Change from functional separation to a requirement to corporately 
separate as soon as possible but no later than within the next five years.
5.  Strong codes of conduct that form the base for more detailed rulemaking.  
(A special thanks to Lara Leibman for her assistance).

Below is a summary of the entire settlement:

1.  All customers can exercise choice beginning January 1, 2001.
2.  All utili