 speed for the speed limit there.
 
Sergeant
Hawkes testified that appellant was traveling at
45-50 miles per hour in a 60 mile per hour zone.  Sergeant Hawkes
also stated that he had been a certified peace officer for 102 
years and that he had observed A[t]housands of cars on that highway.@




Much
of appellant=s
argument concentrates on the portion of the stop that was recorded by the
camera in Sergeant Hawkes=s
vehicle.  However, Sergeant Hawkes said early in his testimony: 
The
initial reason for the stop probably wasn=t on [the film], but as soon as I had
probable cause then I activated my camera.[1]
 
Sergeant
Hawkes testified that he stopped appellant for Afailing to maintain a single lane and
driving on the shoulder.@  Citing Bass v. State, 64 S.W.3d 646,
648 (Tex.App. - Texarkana 2001, pet=n ref=d),
State v. Cerny, 28 S.W.3d 796, 800 (Tex.App. - Corpus Christi 2000, no pet=n), and Hernandez v. State, 983
S.W.2d 867, 871 (Tex.App. B
Austin 1998, pet=n ref=d), appellant argues that his failure
to drive within a single lane did not constitute a violation of TEX. TRANSP.
CODE ANN. '
545.060(a) (Vernon 1999) because there was no evidence that his driving was
unsafe.  Section 545.060(a) requires an
operator on a roadway divided into two or more clearly-marked lanes for traffic
to (1) drive, as nearly as practical, entirely within a single lane and (2) not
move from the lane unless that movement can be made safely.
The
court in Bass held that the State had not presented evidence that Bass=s one lane change occurred in an unsafe
manner; the court noted that the officer did not testify that, based on his
experience, he subjectively suspected Bass of being intoxicated.   Hernandez involved a police officer
stopping the driver after observing him swerve once 18 to 24 inches from the
right lane into the adjacent left lane of traffic going the same
direction.  The swerve in question was
characterized as a slow drift over and back and was not a problem for any other
vehicle.�