 I've not felt
hemmed in or constricted by it's design mechanics.

I've had a few javascript 'settings' fail to make it all the way to my Ember
components, but in general these were bugs that were promptly fixed in newer
versions. Docs are pretty good too.

I kind of like it. It's been pretty nice to just have a dropdown, a button, a
label, a whatever out of the box without me having to figure out all the CSS
tricks for mobile or various browsers. And the more I've used it I've been
able to craft my own visual components upon its foundation that conform to a
consistent style.

[1] [http://semantic-org.github.io/Semantic-UI-Ember/](http://semantic-
org.github.io/Semantic-UI-Ember/)

------
ludbek
I have been using Semantic UI for a while now. Overall I love this framework.
It has lots of essential components. I highly recommend it to lean startups
who dont have enough expertise for designing and developing their own UI
components.

But I do hate it for having weak and restrictive responsive queries.

------
Mizza
Semantic has replaced Bootstrap as my go-to web framework. I find it more
natural, and the default components are nicer. I think it needs a larger theme
ecosystem and more consistent documentation, but I appreciate all the work
that has gone into it.

------
tabeth
Is it possible these days to have a fully interactive mobile application with
just HTML and CSS? Have CSS animations gotten good enough? I'm talking things
like pure CSS accordians, modals/pop-ups, tooltips, etc.

Semantic UI is something I personally use for a few projects, but I really
wish some of this stuff didn't require so much javascript and was more
encapsulated like Tachyons [1]. The main problem I've encountered when using
Semantic UI is that it becomes difficult to change the prebuild components
significantly.

[1] [http://tachyons.io/](http://tachyons.io/)

~~~
pitaj
It may be possible, but it would be very difficult to make it accessible for
screen readers, etc.

~~~
tabeth
Can you elaborate? I was under the impression that HTML an