hich does not confer a private right of action.
                                            -3-
       With the above considerations in mind, we affirm the dismissal of the claim. The
case is remanded to the trial court for such further proceedings as may be necessary.
Costs of the appeal are taxed to the appellant, Russell Leaks.


                                               _________________________________
                                               JOHN W. McCLARTY, JUDGE




                                         -4-



984 So.2d 352 (2007)
Jimmy DAO, Appellant
v.
STATE of Mississippi, Appellee.
No. 2006-KA-01170-COA.
Court of Appeals of Mississippi.
December 11, 2007.
Rehearing Denied March 11, 2008.
*353 Glenn Sturdivant Swartzfager, Jackson, attorney for appellant.
Office of the Attorney General by Deirdre McCrory, attorney for appellee.
Before MYERS, P.J., IRVING, BARNES and ROBERTS, JJ.
IRVING, J., for the Court.
¶ 1. Jimmy Dao was convicted by a jury of aggravated assault and was sentenced by the Forrest County Circuit Court to serve twenty years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections. Aggrieved, Dao appeals and asserts (1) that the trial court erred in allowing the State to introduce evidence regarding his alleged gang affiliation, (2) that the trial court erred in allowing the State to question defense witnesses about an unrelated murder, and (3) that there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction.[1]
¶ 2. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

FACTS
¶ 3. Around 10:00 p.m. on June 18, 2003, nine men in two vehicles, a Toyota 4-Runner and a Mercedes, were involved in an altercation after meeting at a stop light on Hardy Street in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. The altercation ended when Dao, a passenger in the Mercedes, fired a shot that struck the open front passenger door of the 4-Runner. A few months after the incident, Dao was arrested and charged with aggravated assault.
¶ 4. At trial, the State presented the testimony of Don Ladner, B.J. Fokakis, and Zac