ollowing years, Poincaré frequented the neoKantian and republican milieu, becoming one of the collaborators of the Revue de métaphysique et de morale (a journal in which Duhem published only once, in 1916), see (Soulié 2009, 68, 222-225), (Príncipe 2015a et 2015b). It seems to me probable that Duhem's divergence from Poincaré's ideas, explicit in his later texts, is partly an effect of his rejection of neo-Kantianism, although Poincaré's interest in the progress of atomism may have played a more important role. Duhem frequented neo-Thomist circles hostiles to Kantianism, see (Rossi 2006, 123, note 35). Poincaré's flexible epistemological views are in harmony with his anti-dogmatism, his opposition to clerical intolerance, his republican spirit in favor of the egalitarian ideal, free thought and the right to seek and to speak the truth.22 References Abrantes, Paulo Coelho. 1985. La réception en France des théories de Maxwell concernant l'électricité et le magnétisme. Thèse de doctorat pour le troisième cycle. Université de Paris I. Atten, Michel. 1992. Les théories électriques en France à la fin du XIXe siècle, la contribution des mathématiciens, physiciens et ingénieurs 1870-1900. Paris, thèse de doctorat, Université Paris Diderot (Paris 7). Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette et Kounelis, Catherine. 1991. Les atomes une anthologie historique. Paris: Presses Pocket. Bordoni, Stefano. 2012. Widening the scope of analytical mechanics. Duhem's third pathway to thermodynamics. Preprint 428, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. Available at: http://pubman.mpiwgberlin.mpg.de/pubman/faces/viewItemOverviewPage.jsp?itemId=escidoc:643409:4 Braverman, Charles. 2016. Ampère et Duhem: classification naturelle et engagements ontologiques. Latosensu Revue de la société de philosophie des sciences 3 (1): 69-78. Brenner, Anastasios. 2003. Les origines françaises de la philosophie des sciences. Paris: PUF. Collectif (Pierre Boutroux, Jacques Hadamard, Paul Langevin, Vito Volterra). 1914. Henri Poinc