rial.



859 P.2d 273 (1993)
Terry L. LARSON and Wayne Larson, both individually and as husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
A.T.S.I., a Colorado corporation, and Teddy J. Rainey, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92CA0087.
Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.
March 11, 1993.
As Modified on Denial of Rehearing April 29, 1993.
Certiorari Denied September 27, 1993.
*274 Long & Jaudon, P.C., Gary B. Blum, Elizabeth A. Weishaupl, Denver, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Wood, Ris & Hames, P.C., Mark R. Davis, Denver, for defendants-appellees.
Opinion by Judge TURSI.
Plaintiffs, Terry L. and Wayne Larson, appeal from the judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendants, ATSI and Teddy J. Rainey. We reverse.
Plaintiffs brought this action for personal injuries after a semi-tractor truck owned by ATSI and driven by its employee, Teddy J. Rainey, collided with Terry Larson's vehicle. Defendants admitted legal liability for any injury and damages, caused by the collision, plaintiff may have suffered. Hence, the jury was instructed: "In view of that admission the only issues remaining for the jury to determine are (1) what injury, (if any), and (2) the amount of damages, (if any) which were caused by the occurrence."
The threshold issue pursuant to the No-Fault Act was not contested nor submitted to the jury. See § 10-4-714(1), C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol. 4A). Rather, the major contested issue was whether plaintiff Terry Larson's claim of a seriously debilitating reflex sympathetic dystrophy was caused by the collision. However, the jury also received evidence and was instructed that it should consider non-economic loss incurred and those which would probably be incurred in the future, including pain and suffering, inconvenience, and emotional stress.
The jury returned a special verdict for defendants finding that plaintiff did not incur any injuries, damages, or losses.
Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred by denying their motion for new trial or alternatively for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We agree that,