ation of Rule 60(2), can request referral to a committee only when the Commission states that it does not intend to accept any - I repeat, any - of Parliament's amendments. Commissioner Fischler stated at the beginning of the debate that he accepted some of the amendments as they are. Therefore, the conditions for referral back to committee are not met.

President
Thank you, Mr Fantuzzi.
Mr Dell'Alba wishes to speak.

Dell'Alba
Mr President, I asked to speak only to express my full agreement with what Mr Fantuzzi had to say on this point and to repeat that I do not understand what we are voting on. We had a vote without a report; we voted on all the amendments. Please explain to me what we are referring back to committee, given that the resolution does not exist, because we have a procedure without a report. Frankly, it seems to me that this is a manoeuvre to buy time, and it also goes beyond any Rules of Procedure. I do not see what you can refer back to committee!

President
Mr Dell'Alba, it is the amendments which would be referred back to committee.
I will now put Mr Colino Salamanca's request to the vote.
(Parliament rejected the request)

President
Mr Pasty wishes to speak.

Pasty
Mr President, I should like to make a proposal with regard to the next part of our proceedings. It is very important for us to vote this morning on the second report for which a request for urgent debate has been made, that is, the set-aside requirement. I therefore propose that we do not hold a debate but proceed immediately to the vote which, according to our Rules of Procedure, is possible. We could also adopt the same approach with regard to the report on bananas, otherwise, we will be unable to get everything done this morning. I therefore suggest that we proceed to the vote on the setaside requirement, which will be very short, without holding a debate.

President
Mr Pasty is proposing that, for the remainder of the agenda, we proceed directly to the vote, and that we cancel the debates.
Are there any objections to Mr Pasty'