– Duhem's legacy for the change in the historiography of science: An analysis based on Kuhn's writings 138 Acknowledgements Ι would like to thank José Carlos Pinto de Oliveira and Fábio Leite for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. I would like to thank also Baruana Calado and Christopher Beames for revisions. References Agassi, Joseph. 2002. Kuhn's way. Philosophy of the social sciences 32: 394-430. Brenner, Anastasios. 1990. Duhem, science, réalité et apparence: La relation entre philosophie et histoire dans l'oeuvre de Pierre Duhem. Paris: Vrin. Brown, Harcourt. 1960. The Renaissance and historians of science. Studies in the Renaissance 7: 27-42. Butterfield, Herbert. 1966 [1949]. The origins of modern science 1300-1800. New York: The Free Press. Clagett, Marshall. 1957. George Sarton: historian of medieval science. Isis 48 (3): 320-322. Clagett, Marshall (Ed.). 1969. Critical problems in the history of science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Cohen, Bernard, I. 1987. Alexandre Koyré in America: Some personal reminiscences. In Science: The Renaissance of a history. History and Technology 4: 1-4, Proceedings of the International Conference – Paris, June 1986. Edited by Pietro Redondi. London: Harwood Academic Publishers, pp. 55-70. Crombie, Alistair. 1959. Review of The appreciation of ancient and medieval science during the Renaissance (1450-1600) and Six wings. Men of science in the Renaissance. The British journal for the philosophy of science 10 (38): 164-165. Daumas, Maurice. 1955. Lavoisier théoricien et expérimentateur. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Duhem, Pierre. 1905. Les origines de la statique.Vol. 1. Paris: Hermann. Duhem, Pierre. 1906. Les origines de la statique. Vol. 2. Paris: Hermann. Duhem, Pierre. Préface. 1912. in: Maire, Albert. L'oeuvre scientifique de Blaise Pascal: bibliographie critique et analyse de tous les travaux qui s'y rapportent, I-IX. Paris: Hermann. Duhem, Pierre. 1916. La chimie est-elle une science française? Paris: A. H